Home Records and Reports Contractor Records Owner Records Permit Records Permit Reports Business Reports Property Records Business Tax My Account Code Enforcement Contact Us Log In/Out Print Plan Review Stops For Project Z21070018 Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-10-2021 Cont ID   Sent By scwelter Date 11-10-2021 Time 15:55 Rev Time 0.00 Received By scwelter Date 01-19-2022 Time 14:13 Sent To   Notes 2022-01-19 12:58:54 -TWO MANHOLES IN ALLEY APPEAR TO BE OVERLAPPING ON   CIVIL PLAN. PLEASE ENSURE MANHOLES HAVE ADEQUATE   CLEARANCE DISTANCE.       -WATER SERVICE SHOWN AT NORTH SIDE OF 300 BANYAN   PROPERTY HAS NO EXISTING WATER METER INSTALLED. IF IT   REMAINS AFTER BANYAN STREETSCAPE PROJECT WOULD HAVE TO   COORDINATE METER INSTALLATION AND ACCOUNT SETUP WITH   CITY WPB, AND PAY ALL APPLICABLE FEES, DEPOSITS, AND   CHARGES.       -PROPOSED METERED IRRIGATION WATER SERVICE AT NORTH   SIDE OF PROPERTY DOES NOT SHOW PROPOSED BACKFLOW   ASSEMBLY INSTALLATION. BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY WOULD HAVE TO   BE INSTALLED FOR THE WATER SERVICE TO BE USED, AND MUST   BE AT LOCATION APPROVED BY WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES.       -VERTICAL MOUNT DCDA FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY IS   NONSTANDARD. WOULD REQUIRE ENGINEER DESIGN AND   EVALUATION. PROPOSED BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY MAKE/MODEL WOULD   HAVE TO BE USC-APPROVED FOR VERTICAL ORIENTATION.       -SITE PLAN SAYS FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY IS LOCATED   IN AN OUTDOOR STORAGE ROOM AND APPEARS TO HAVE OPEN   ENTRY. RECOMMEND VERIFYING LOCATION IS ACCEPTABLE TO   FIRE DEPARTMENT AND MEETS NFPA STANDARDS.       -SITE AND LANDSCAPING PLANS NEEDS TO BE UPDATED TO SHOW   RELOCATION OF BIKE RACK NEAR THE WATER METER FOR 300   BANYAN AT SOUTH SIDE OF PROPERTY. CIVIL PLANS SHOW IT   REMOVED ALRIGHT. (NOT SURE IF THEY SHOW THE NEW   LOCATION)       -PROPOSED 3 INCH BFP AND METER FOR 301 CLEMATIS ST. IS   LOCATED SUBSTANTIALLY CLOSE TO EXISTING BUILDING.   CONCERN WAS BROUGHT UP ABOUT BUILDING FOOTERS AND   EXCAVATION ADJACENT BUILDING. EOR SUGGESTED DIMENSIONS   OF BUILDING FOOTER AND SAFETY OF EXCAVATION COULD BE   CONFIRMED. PLEASE SUBMIT THOSE VERIFICATIONS AT FORMAL   ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL.       -PROPOSED 3 INCH METER FOR 301 CLEMATIS ST. MUST BE   INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND IN CONFORMANCE TO WPB SD WS-3   SEP2019.       -PROPOSED 3 INCH METERED WATER SERVICE FOR 301 CLEMATIS   ST. IS NONSTANDARD DESIGN. MAY NEED REVISION AT FORMAL   ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL.       -PROPOSED 3 INCH BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY FOR 301 CLEMATIS ST.   APPEARS TO BE IN THE RIGHT OF WAY. RECOMMEND VERIFYING   LOCATION IS ACCEPTABLE WITH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.       -PLANS DO NOT SHOW EXISTING LARGE DIAMETER FIRELINE   WATER SERVICE OR DCDA FIRELINE BACKFLOW INSTALLATION AT   301 CLEMATIS ST. SHOW BOTH AT FORMAL ENGINEERING   SUBMITTAL.       -PROPOSED 4 INCH PARALLEL RPZ MAY HAVE BIGGER FOOTPRINT   THAN SHOWN ON CIVIL PLANS.       -CIVIL PLANS DO NOT SHOW CROSSING INFORMATION OR   PROFILES FOR UTILITY WORK IN ALLEY. WHEN REVIEWED AT   FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF THERE ARE ANY   CONFLICTS, ADDITIONAL WORK OR PLAN REVISION MAY BE   NEEDED.       -CIVIL PLANS DO NOT COMMUNICATE PROPOSED LOCATION FOR 2   INCH BFP AT EAST SIDE OF 301 CLEMATIS AND WHAT IS   HAPPENING TO THE ASSOCIATED WATER METER. ANY PROPOSED   LOCATION MUST BE REVIEWED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES AND   RETEST/REINSPECTION WOULD BE REQUIRED.       -CIVIL PLANS SHOW EXSS AND EXDN FLOWING TO ONE MANHOLE   IN OLIVE. EOR NEEDS TO VERIFY IF THIS IS ACCURATE AND   UPDATE PLANS AS NEEDED.       -EXISTING METERED WATER SERVICES TO 301 CLEMATIS ST.   BUILDING ARE NOT SHOWN AND LABELED ON WATER PLAN WITH   WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THEM. UPDATE AT FORMAL ENGINEERING   SUBMITTAL.       -PLANS ARE MISSING SEVERAL STANDARD DETAILS INCLUDING   SMALL METERED WATER SERVICE, LARGE METERED WATER   SERVICE, AND FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY. ADD AT FORMAL   ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL.       -PLANS FOR EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES AND UTILITY   POLES ALONG THE ALLEYWAY WERE PREVIOUSLY UNCERTAIN.   NEWEST REVISION PLANS STILL DO NOT SEEM TO ACCOUNT FOR   THEM, OR DETAIL WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THEM.     2022-01-19 12:56:20 ENGINEERING   -TWO MANHOLES IN ALLEY APPEAR TO BE OVERLAPPING ON   CIVIL PLAN. PLEASE ENSURE MANHOLES HAVE ADEQUATE   CLEARANCE DISTANCE.       -WATER SERVICE SHOWN AT NORTH SIDE OF 300 BANYAN   PROPERTY HAS NO EXISTING WATER METER INSTALLED. IF IT   REMAINS AFTER BANYAN STREETSCAPE PROJECT WOULD HAVE TO   COORDINATE METER INSTALLATION AND ACCOUNT SETUP WITH   CITY WPB, AND PAY ALL APPLICABLE FEES, DEPOSITS, AND   CHARGES.       -PROPOSED METERED IRRIGATION WATER SERVICE AT NORTH   SIDE OF PROPERTY DOES NOT SHOW PROPOSED BACKFLOW   ASSEMBLY INSTALLATION. BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY WOULD HAVE TO   BE INSTALLED FOR THE WATER SERVICE TO BE USED, AND MUST   BE AT LOCATION APPROVED BY WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES.       -VERTICAL MOUNT DCDA FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY IS   NONSTANDARD. WOULD REQUIRE ENGINEER DESIGN AND   EVALUATION. PROPOSED BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY MAKE/MODEL WOULD   HAVE TO BE USC-APPROVED FOR VERTICAL ORIENTATION.       -SITE PLAN SAYS FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY IS LOCATED   IN AN OUTDOOR STORAGE ROOM AND APPEARS TO HAVE OPEN   ENTRY. RECOMMEND VERIFYING LOCATION IS ACCEPTABLE TO   FIRE DEPARTMENT AND MEETS NFPA STANDARDS.       -SITE AND LANDSCAPING PLANS NEEDS TO BE UPDATED TO SHOW   RELOCATION OF BIKE RACK NEAR THE WATER METER FOR 300   BANYAN AT SOUTH SIDE OF PROPERTY. CIVIL PLANS SHOW IT   REMOVED ALRIGHT. (NOT SURE IF THEY SHOW THE NEW   LOCATION)       -PROPOSED 3 INCH BFP AND METER FOR 301 CLEMATIS ST. IS   LOCATED SUBSTANTIALLY CLOSE TO EXISTING BUILDING.   CONCERN WAS BROUGHT UP ABOUT BUILDING FOOTERS AND   EXCAVATION ADJACENT BUILDING. EOR SUGGESTED DIMENSIONS   OF BUILDING FOOTER AND SAFETY OF EXCAVATION COULD BE   CONFIRMED. PLEASE SUBMIT THOSE VERIFICATIONS AT FORMAL   ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL.       -PROPOSED 3 INCH METER FOR 301 CLEMATIS ST. MUST BE   INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND IN CONFORMANCE TO WPB SD WS-3   SEP2019.       -PROPOSED 3 INCH METERED WATER SERVICE FOR 301 CLEMATIS   ST. IS NONSTANDARD DESIGN. MAY NEED REVISION AT FORMAL   ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL.       -PROPOSED 3 INCH BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY FOR 301 CLEMATIS ST.   APPEARS TO BE IN THE RIGHT OF WAY. RECOMMEND VERIFYING   LOCATION IS ACCEPTABLE WITH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.       -PLANS DO NOT SHOW EXISTING LARGE DIAMETER FIRELINE   WATER SERVICE OR DCDA FIRELINE BACKFLOW INSTALLATION AT   301 CLEMATIS ST. SHOW BOTH AT FORMAL ENGINEERING   SUBMITTAL.       -PROPOSED 4 INCH PARALLEL RPZ MAY HAVE BIGGER FOOTPRINT   THAN SHOWN ON CIVIL PLANS.       -CIVIL PLANS DO NOT SHOW CROSSING INFORMATION OR   PROFILES FOR UTILITY WORK IN ALLEY. WHEN REVIEWED AT   FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF THERE ARE ANY   CONFLICTS, ADDITIONAL WORK OR PLAN REVISION MAY BE   NEEDED.       -CIVIL PLANS DO NOT COMMUNICATE PROPOSED LOCATION FOR 2   INCH BFP AT EAST SIDE OF 301 CLEMATIS AND WHAT IS   HAPPENING TO THE ASSOCIATED WATER METER. ANY PROPOSED   LOCATION MUST BE REVIEWED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES AND   RETEST/REINSPECTION WOULD BE REQUIRED.       -CIVIL PLANS SHOW EXSS AND EXDN FLOWING TO ONE MANHOLE   IN OLIVE. EOR NEEDS TO VERIFY IF THIS IS ACCURATE AND   UPDATE PLANS AS NEEDED.       -EXISTING METERED WATER SERVICES TO 301 CLEMATIS ST.   BUILDING ARE NOT SHOWN AND LABELED ON WATER PLAN WITH   WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THEM. UPDATE AT FORMAL ENGINEERING   SUBMITTAL.       -PLANS ARE MISSING SEVERAL STANDARD DETAILS INCLUDING   SMALL METERED WATER SERVICE, LARGE METERED WATER   SERVICE, AND FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY. ADD AT FORMAL   ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL.       -PLANS FOR EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES AND UTILITY   POLES ALONG THE ALLEYWAY WERE PREVIOUSLY UNCERTAIN.   NEWEST REVISION PLANS STILL DO NOT SEEM TO ACCOUNT FOR   THEM, OR DETAIL WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THEM.     2021-11-10 15:56:25 PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT:   TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT ARE OVER   $500,000 IT IS SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT AS   PER CITY ORDINANCE.   SECTION 78-129: ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS,   INCLUDING NEW CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR   IMPROVEMENT OF AN EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE TOTAL   CONSTRUCTION COSTS ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN   $500,000 ARE SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT.   OPTION 1: INSTALL ARTWORK ON THE DEVELOPMENT SITE   VALUED IN AN AMOUNT NOT LESS THAN ONE PERCENT OF THE   TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS; OR   OPTION 2: CONTRIBUTE AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO 75 PERCENT OF   ONE PERCENT OF THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR DEPOSIT   TO THE PUBLIC ART ACCOUNT.   A COMPLETED PUBLIC ART ASSESSMENT APPLICATION IS   REQUIRED AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.       CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ADMINISTRATOR OF PUBLIC ART &   CULTURE AT [email protected] TO OBTAIN AN ART ASSESSMENT   APPLICATION AND REVIEW THE REQUIREMENTS.     Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-11-2021 Cont ID   Sent By rbrown Date 08-11-2021 Time 20:46 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rbrown Date 08-11-2021 Time 20:46 Sent To   Notes 2021-08-11 20:53:40 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,   COMMENTS:       1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE   SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH   FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE   ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.       2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AN ASBESTOS   SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT   REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH   COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963,   OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]       3. NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. ACCESSIBLE   PARKING SPACES ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANS BUT A COUNT OF   TOTAL PROPOSED PARKING SPACES COULD NOT BE FOUND, AND   THAT WILL DETERMINE THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE   PARKING SPACES. THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE   PARKING SPACES PROVIDED SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH   SECTION 208.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE.       4. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. SEE COMMENT 3, ABOVE.   PER SECTION 208.2.4 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE   IN EVERY SIX REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE)   IN A PARKING STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND   DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA   ACCESSIBILITY CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98   INCHES AT SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)       5. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,   THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR   THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,   AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE   FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.       6. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES   NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO   MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL   BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE   EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED   TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR   OTHER APPROVED METHODS.       7. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. IF ANY OF THE RETAIL TENANTS ARE   TO BE RESTAURANTS GREASE INTERCEPTORS WILL BE REQUIRED.   FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE AND   LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT TIM LARGE, CHIEF PLUMBING   INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561)   805-6692, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]       8. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS   AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE   WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED   FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,   GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND   OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,   SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.       9. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND   CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF   CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL   NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.       10. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER   AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,   INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE   CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF   NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION   THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.       11. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT   WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL   HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION   OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,   CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT   (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]       12. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT   TO ART LIFE ASSESSMENT UNDER THE CITY OF WEST PALM   BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) PROGRAM. FOR ADVICE   ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP   ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC   PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:   [email protected]       ROBERT BROWN   BUILDING OFFICIAL   TEL: 561 805 6652   EMAIL: [email protected]     Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 4 Status P Date 01-27-2022 Cont ID   Sent By LDeloren Date 01-27-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By ldeloren Date 01-27-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-01-19 13:02:29 ENGINEERING       CONDITION OF APPROVAL: -PROPOSED 3 INCH METER FOR 301   CLEMATIS ST. MUST BE INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND IN   CONFORMANCE TO WPB SD WS-3 SEP2019.-TWO MANHOLES IN   ALLEY APPEAR TO BE OVERLAPPING ON CIVIL PLAN. PLEASE   ENSURE MANHOLES HAVE ADEQUATE CLEARANCE DISTANCE.       ALL OTHER COMMENTS SHALL BE ADDRESSED DURING FORMAL   ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL.       -WATER SERVICE SHOWN AT NORTH SIDE OF 300 BANYAN   PROPERTY HAS NO EXISTING WATER METER INSTALLED. IF IT   REMAINS AFTER BANYAN STREETSCAPE PROJECT WOULD HAVE TO   COORDINATE METER INSTALLATION AND ACCOUNT SETUP WITH   CITY WPB, AND PAY ALL APPLICABLE FEES, DEPOSITS, AND   CHARGES.       -PROPOSED METERED IRRIGATION WATER SERVICE AT NORTH   SIDE OF PROPERTY DOES NOT SHOW PROPOSED BACKFLOW   ASSEMBLY INSTALLATION. BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY WOULD HAVE TO   BE INSTALLED FOR THE WATER SERVICE TO BE USED, AND MUST   BE AT LOCATION APPROVED BY WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES.       -VERTICAL MOUNT DCDA FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY IS   NONSTANDARD. WOULD REQUIRE ENGINEER DESIGN AND   EVALUATION. PROPOSED BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY MAKE/MODEL WOULD   HAVE TO BE USC-APPROVED FOR VERTICAL ORIENTATION.       -SITE PLAN SAYS FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY IS LOCATED   IN AN OUTDOOR STORAGE ROOM AND APPEARS TO HAVE OPEN   ENTRY. RECOMMEND VERIFYING LOCATION IS ACCEPTABLE TO   FIRE DEPARTMENT AND MEETS NFPA STANDARDS.       -SITE AND LANDSCAPING PLANS NEEDS TO BE UPDATED TO SHOW   RELOCATION OF BIKE RACK NEAR THE WATER METER FOR 300   BANYAN AT SOUTH SIDE OF PROPERTY. CIVIL PLANS SHOW IT   REMOVED ALRIGHT. (NOT SURE IF THEY SHOW THE NEW   LOCATION)       -PROPOSED 3 INCH BFP AND METER FOR 301 CLEMATIS ST. IS   LOCATED SUBSTANTIALLY CLOSE TO EXISTING BUILDING.   CONCERN WAS BROUGHT UP ABOUT BUILDING FOOTERS AND   EXCAVATION ADJACENT BUILDING. EOR SUGGESTED DIMENSIONS   OF BUILDING FOOTER AND SAFETY OF EXCAVATION COULD BE   CONFIRMED. PLEASE SUBMIT THOSE VERIFICATIONS AT FORMAL   ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL.           -PROPOSED 3 INCH METERED WATER SERVICE FOR 301 CLEMATIS   ST. IS NONSTANDARD DESIGN. MAY NEED REVISION AT FORMAL   ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL.       -PROPOSED 3 INCH BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY FOR 301 CLEMATIS ST.   APPEARS TO BE IN THE RIGHT OF WAY. RECOMMEND VERIFYING   LOCATION IS ACCEPTABLE WITH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.       -PLANS DO NOT SHOW EXISTING LARGE DIAMETER FIRELINE   WATER SERVICE OR DCDA FIRELINE BACKFLOW INSTALLATION AT   301 CLEMATIS ST. SHOW BOTH AT FORMAL ENGINEERING   SUBMITTAL.       -PROPOSED 4 INCH PARALLEL RPZ MAY HAVE BIGGER FOOTPRINT   THAN SHOWN ON CIVIL PLANS.       -CIVIL PLANS DO NOT SHOW CROSSING INFORMATION OR   PROFILES FOR UTILITY WORK IN ALLEY. WHEN REVIEWED AT   FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF THERE ARE ANY   CONFLICTS, ADDITIONAL WORK OR PLAN REVISION MAY BE   NEEDED.       -CIVIL PLANS DO NOT COMMUNICATE PROPOSED LOCATION FOR 2   INCH BFP AT EAST SIDE OF 301 CLEMATIS AND WHAT IS   HAPPENING TO THE ASSOCIATED WATER METER. ANY PROPOSED   LOCATION MUST BE REVIEWED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES AND   RETEST/REINSPECTION WOULD BE REQUIRED.       -CIVIL PLANS SHOW EXSS AND EXDN FLOWING TO ONE MANHOLE   IN OLIVE. EOR NEEDS TO VERIFY IF THIS IS ACCURATE AND   UPDATE PLANS AS NEEDED.       -EXISTING METERED WATER SERVICES TO 301 CLEMATIS ST.   BUILDING ARE NOT SHOWN AND LABELED ON WATER PLAN WITH   WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THEM. UPDATE AT FORMAL ENGINEERING   SUBMITTAL.       -PLANS ARE MISSING SEVERAL STANDARD DETAILS INCLUDING   SMALL METERED WATER SERVICE, LARGE METERED WATER   SERVICE, AND FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY. ADD AT FORMAL   ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL.       -PLANS FOR EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES AND UTILITY   POLES ALONG THE ALLEYWAY WERE PREVIOUSLY UNCERTAIN.   NEWEST REVISION PLANS STILL DO NOT SEEM TO ACCOUNT FOR   THEM, OR DETAIL WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THEM.     Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 3 Status F Date 12-02-2021 Cont ID   Sent By rrossano Date 12-02-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By rrossano Date 12-02-2021 Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-12-02 10:49:32 COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENG.   SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098 [email protected] :       SHEET 6.1 & SHEET 6.2 ? LOOKS LIKE THESE SHEETS ARE   INTENDED TO CONTAIN STANDARD DETAILS, BUT IT APPEARS   LIKE THEY?RE FORMATTED WRONG. THE FILE NAME SHOWS CAD   AND ALSO JPEG. PLEASE CORRECT.       COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE   SUPER., WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-494-2262 OR   [email protected]:   FOLLOWUP COMMENTS:       SHOW AND LABEL PROPOSED METERED IRRIGATION WATER   SERVICE AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY.   RESPONSE: WE PLAN TO USE THE IRRIGATION METER THAT   CURRENTLY EXISTS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE ALLEY AT THE   300 BANYAN PROPERTY, BUT WILL CONFIRM PRIOR TO   SUBMITTAL OF FORMAL ENGINEERING PERMITS.   FOLLOWUP: METER BOX AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY NOT SHOWN   CLEARLY ON PLANS, BUT MAY CONFLICT WITH THE LOADING   ZONE. THEY CANNOT BE LOCATED IN VEHICULAR TRAFFIC.       CIVIL PLANS DO NOT SHOW 301 CLEMATIS ST. PLEASE ADD   SEPARATE SHEET SHOWING WATER AND SEWER UTILITY FOR THAT   PROPERTY AND ADD WATER DEMAND CALCULATIONS. ALSO SHOW   WATER AND SEWER SERVICES.   RESPONSE: NO SITE CIVIL WORK IS BEING DONE FOR 301   CLEMATIS. ADDING THIS TO THE PLAN SHEET WILL REQUIRE   REDUCING THE DRAWING SCALE SIGNIFICANTLY. WE HAVE   ELECTED TO SHOW THE 301 CLEMATIS PROPERTY ON A SEPARATE   SHEET.   NEW RESPONSE: BASED ON OWNER?S NEW PLANS, THE EXISTING   2? WATER SERVICE AND BACKFLOW FROM OLIVE AVENUE TO 301   CLEMATIS WILL BE ABANDONED, AND A NEW 3?   SERVICE/BACKFLOW WILL BE BROUGHT IN FROM THE 4? WATER   MAIN IN THE ALLEY. PLANS HAVE BEEN ADDED TO SHOW THE   301 CLEMATIS BUILDING, SHOWING FIRE LINE ACCESS, WATER   SERVICES, AND SEWER LINE CONNECTIONS. THIS DESIGN WILL   BE FURTHER REFINED PRIOR TO FINAL PERMIT SUBMITTAL FOR   ENGINEERING PERMITS.   FOLLOWUP: SEPARATE SHEET FOR 301 CLEMATIS IS MISSING.   PLEASE INCLUDE ON NEXT RESUBMITTAL. DESIGN OF PROPOSED   WATER SERVICE FOR 301 CLEMATIS LOOKS PROBLEMATIC FOR   SEVERAL REASONS. 3 INCH METER WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO BE   PLACED AT SOUTH SIDE OF ALLEY ROW DUE TO VEHICLE   TRAFFIC. THE OTHER SUBSTANTIAL ISSUES ARE THAT THE   WATER SERVICE SHOULD NOT BE ROUTED THROUGH ANOTHER   PRIVATE WATER SERVICE AND NOT SEEING ACCEPTABLE   LOCATION FOR THE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY. LESSER ISSUES ARE   THAT PIPING IS SLEEVED, ADDITIONAL VALVING WOULD BE   NEEDED, AND PIPE SIZING APPEARS INADEQUATE.       NEW COMMENTS:       -THERE APPEARS TO BE A BIKE RACK ON THE EAST SIDE OF   THE DOMESTIC BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES. THERE MAY NOT BE   ENOUGH SPACE TO USE BIKE RACK SINCE THE BACKFLOWS AND   METER ARE ABOVE-GROUND.       -ON SIGNING PLAN PLEASE SHOW ANY SIGNS AT THE EAST SIDE   OF THE ALLEY. THERE SHOULD BE SIGNS PREVENTING TRAFFIC   INTO THE ALLEY AND ALSO SIGNS NOTIFYING OLIVE IS ONE   WAY.       -PLEASE ADJUST LOCATION OF ABOVE-GROUND METER SO THAT   BYPASS BLOWOFF BOX WILL NOT BE RAN OVER BY VEHICLES IN   ALLEY.       -AUTOTURN EXHIBIT MAKES IT LOOK LIKE LARGE TRUCKS WILL   HIT OBJECTS AND STRUCTURES IN ALLEY. PLEASE VERIFY   LARGE VEHICLES WILL HAVE SUFFICIENT CLEARANCE.       -PLANS DID NOT SHOW KNEE WALL ANYMORE AT SOUTH EAST   OUTSIDE DINING AREA. A-1 SHEET MAKES TABLES LOOK CLOSE   TO ALLEY TRAFFIC WITHOUT ANY OBJECTS IN BETWEEN FOR   PROTECTION. IS THAT AS INTENDED?       -ON GRADING PLAN PLEASE CHECK DRAINAGE AT THE 12.05   ELEVATION IN ALLEY. WILL WATER FLOW INTO DINING AREA   AND REMAIN THERE?       -SHEETS 6.1 AND 6.2 OF CIVIL PLAN SET ARE NOT READABLE   OR SHOWING CORRECTLY.       -EXPLAIN WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THE EXISTING WATER   SERVICE AND METER BOX ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY   ADJACENT BANYAN. IF IT WILL REMAIN, SHOW LOCATION ON   PLANS.     Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-14-2021 Cont ID   Sent By rrossano Date 10-14-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By rrossano Date 10-14-2021 Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-10-14 07:36:19 COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR,   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098   [email protected] :       1. CONFIRM THAT A COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE   HAS BEEN SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF   CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION).   2. CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY   SEWER ARE REQUIRED.   3. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND   PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM   AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE   PER FAC 64E-8 FOR WATER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR SEWER.   4. PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND   STORMWATER PIPES ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE.   5. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND   IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED   AREAS.   6. COORDINATE WITH MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE   SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING   PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT   HIM AT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]   7. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL , PLANS SHALL SHOW   PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER,   STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES, INCLUDING   STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY   SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, METERS, AND   OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH   BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES   SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS,   CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND   MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER LINES. ALL   AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PROFILE VIEW.   DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN   VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. ADDITIONALLY,   PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED   UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,   ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION   FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.   8. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL , CUT AND CAP   UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY ABANDONED UTILITY   LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY RIGHT OF WAY.   9. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL , PROVIDE DEDICATED   UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO   PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS.   10. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE   ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION OF WATER   METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION.   11. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE CALLOUT   DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA AND FIRE BACKFLOW   PREVENTER AS DCDA. SPECIFY LEAD FREE DESIGN ON ALL   BACKFLOWS.   12. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND   NPDES NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.   - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:   - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS   THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF   DEVELOPMENT OR SALE; AND   - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE   STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A   MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).   - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF   CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION   THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL   SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT   OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION. IF THE ENGINEERING PLANS DO   NOT INCLUDE AN EROSION CONTROL PLAN, THEN THE   CONTRACTOR SHOULD SUBMIT ONE PRIOR TO RECEIVING THE   ENGINEERING PERMIT.   13. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES   OF PROPOSED AND EXISTING WATER AND SEWER WITHIN RIGHT   OF WAY AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.   14. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING   APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT   SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING   SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED   LEAD-FREE DESIGN.   15. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL CLEARLY SHOW ROAD   RIGHT OF WAY.   16. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL PROVIDE SANITARY   ELEVATIONS AT MANHOLE TIE-IN.   17. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES   ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY   LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT   PARCELS.   18. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES   ARE BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL   ADDRESSES.   19. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN TRENCHING IN   IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE 50   FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF   PROPOSED TRENCH PER CURRENT CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL   GC-8.   20. PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING AND   INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER   (Z-XXXXXXXX).       THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD   CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES,   PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]:       FOLLOWUP COMMENTS:       -RESPONSES DO NOT SEEM TO MATCH CIVIL PLANS. NOT SURE   IF OLD PLAN WAS SUBMITTED OR RESPONSES ARE INACCURATE.   PLEASE UPDATE BOTH AS NEEDED AND RESUBMIT. WILL LIST   THE PROBLEMATIC ONES BELOW:       WATER SERVICE STANDARD DETAILS ON CIVIL PLANS ARE OLD   REVISION. PLEASE USE NEWEST REVISION.   RESPONSE: NEWEST DETAILS HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED INTO   THIS RESUBMITTAL.       WATER METERS OF SIZE THREE INCHES OR LARGER NEED TO BE   INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND REFERENCING THE ABOVE-GROUND   METER STANDARD DETAIL.   RESPONSE: NOTED. PROJECT WILL USE A THREE-INCH DOMESTIC   METER.       ADJUST METER MAINTENANCE BYPASS SO IT IS ON THE SOUTH   SIDE OF THE METER INSTEAD OF THE NORTH SIDE.   RESPONSE: METER BYPASS ORIENTATION HAS BEEN ADJUSTED   ACCORDINGLY.       FOR A THREE-INCH METER THE WATER SERVICE SHOULD BE   FOUR-INCH DIP. IF NEED SIX-INCH DIP WATER SERVICE, THEN   ADJUST METER TO SIX-INCH SIZE.   RESPONSE: WE ARE ASSUMING A 4? DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE   LINE WHICH WILL USE A 3? METER.       RELOCATE METER ASSEMBLY FOUR FEET EAST.   RESPONSE: METER ASSEMBLY HAS BEEN RELOCATED. REFER TO   SHEET C 4.1.       SHOW AND LABEL PROPOSED CLEANOUTS ON THE SEWER PLAN.   RESPONSE: CLEANOUTS ARE SHOWN ON THE SEWER PLAN.       SHOW AND LABEL TAPPING VALVES AT WATER MAIN FOR FIRE   AND WATER SERVICES.   RESPONSE: TAPPING VALVES ADDED FOR THE FIRE AND   DOMESTIC WATER SERVICES.       CONSIDER DUAL/PARALLEL DOMESTIC BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES TO   MINIMIZE WATER OUTAGE DURING BACKFLOW MAINTENANCE.   RESPONSE: NOTED. PARALLEL DOMESTIC BACKFLOWS WILL BE   SPECIFIED.       CIVIL PLANS DO NOT SHOW 301 CLEMATIS ST. PLEASE ADD   SEPARATE SHEET SHOWING WATER AND SEWER UTILITY FOR THAT   PROPERTY AND ADD WATER DEMAND CALCULATIONS. ALSO SHOW   WATER AND SEWER SERVICES.   RESPONSE: NO SITE CIVIL WORK IS BEING DONE FOR 301   CLEMATIS. ADDING THIS TO THE PLAN SHEET WILL REQUIRE   REDUCING THE DRAWING SCALE SIGNIFICANTLY. WE HAVE   ELECTED TO SHOW THE 301 CLEMATIS PROPERTY ON A SEPARATE   SHEET.       CIVIL PLANS DO NOT SHOW PAVEMENT RESTORATION FOR OLIVE   AVE. PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL THOSE BOUNDARIES AND ADD   APPROPRIATE STANDARD DETAIL.   RESPONSE: PAVEMENT RESTORATION ON OLIVE AVENUE HAS BEEN   ADDED TO THE PLANS.           NEW COMMENTS:       -SITE PLAN SHOWS DOOR FROM SOUTHERN BUILDING OPENING   INTO ALLEY ROW.       -PROPOSED DOMESTIC BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY SHOULD NOT BE IN   UTILITY EASEMENT.       -IS A GAS LINE RUNNING THROUGH A GREASE TRAP?       -COMMUNICATION UTILITY CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED MH1. HOW   WILL IT BE RESOLVED?       -WILL DOOR HIT FDC AT NW CORNER?       -WILL DOOR HIT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY?       -SHOW AND LABEL PROPOSED METERED IRRIGATION WATER   SERVICE AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY.       -TWO SECTIONS OF 2 FOOT CONCRETE KNEE WALL IS PROPOSED   DIRECTLY ABOVE DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE. THAT IS A   MAINTENANCE CONFLICT FOR THE WATER SERVICE.       -ADD ABOVE GROUND TO LABEL OF DOMESTIC WATER METER.   REFERENCE THE CORRECT STANDARD DETAIL AND ADD STANDARD   DETAIL TO CIVIL PLAN SET.       -RECOMMEND DRAIN FOR ROOM WITH DCDA IN CASE IT FLOODS.       -LABEL GATE VALVE FOR FIRELINE AT WATERMAIN POINT OF   SERVICE.       -AT FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD FIRE FLOW   CALCULATIONS TO WATER PLAN.       -THERE ARE AT LEAST THREE ACTIVE METERED WATER SERVICES   AT ALLEY NEAR NORTHWEST CORNER OF 301 CLEMATIS. UPDATE   DEMO AND WATER PLANS TO SHOW MORE CLEARLY WHAT IS   HAPPENING TO THEM. ALSO SHOW THE ASSOCIATED BACKFLOW   ASSEMBLIES. THE NORTHERN METER IS IRRIGATION AND MAY   CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED GREASE TRAPS. THE SOUTHERN TWO   ARE FOR 107 N OLIVE AVE AND 109 N OLIVE.       -THE CONCRETE UTILITY POLES IN ALLEY NEAR LOADING ZONES   MAY CONFLICT WITH LOADING ZONE TRAFFIC. THEY ARE ALSO   NOT SHOWED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN. PLEASE CLEARLY LABEL   THOSE ON ALL PLAN SETS WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THEM.   THEY SEEM TO HAVE WIRES RUNNING FROM THEM ACROSS THE   ALLEY TO 301 CLEMATIS.       -DEMO PLAN SAYS WOOD POLES ARE BEING REMOVED IN ALLEY.   VERIFY IF THERE ARE OVERHEAD UTILITIES AND CONDUITS   RUNNING FROM THEM. IF SO, SHOW AND LABEL WHAT IS   HAPPENING TO THE OVERHEAD UTILITIES AND CONDUITS ON THE   CIVIL PLANS.           COMMENTS PER MIKE TECHNOW 561-494-1047 OR   [email protected] WITH ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS.       -PLEASE PROVIDE UTILITY CROSSING PROFILE AND UTILITY   CROSSING INFORMATION.   -THE FLOW APPEARS TO BE ENTERING THE GREASE TRAP? WHERE   IS THIS COMING FROM?   - CALL OUT HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES.   -CALL OUT POINT OF SERVICE FOR 6? DIP PRIVATE WATER   LINE.   -SHOW DRY UTILITIES ON N OLIVE AVE.   -THE CALL OUT SHOULD READ ?TAPPING TEE? ON PROP. 8?   FIRE LINE OFF OF N OLIVE.   -SHOW EXISTING VALVES AND MANHOLES WITHIN MILLING AND   RESURFACING LIMITS. (ON THE SOUTH END OF N OLIVE).   -ADD NOTE CALLING OUT STORM INLET AT SE CORNER.   -NEED A VALVE AFTER THE TAP ON THE PROP. 6? FIRE LINE.   -ADD ADDITIONAL VALVE IN METER ASSEMBLY PER CITY   DETAIL.     Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-05-2021 Cont ID   Sent By rrossano Date 08-05-2021 Time   Rev Time   Received By rrossano Date 08-05-2021 Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-08-05 13:05:06 COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR,   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098   [email protected] :       1. THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF   REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY   AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND   WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. TO VIEW   DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER   ENGINEERING RELATED DOCUMENTS, CLICK HERE OR GO TO: HTT   PS://WWW.WPB.ORG/GOVERNMENT/ENGINEERING/ENGINEERING-FOR   MS-PERMITS-AND-APPLICATIONS .   2. CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH,   FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08, ADOPTED   SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18) CHAPTER 90   UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. SEC. 90-7.   POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER SERVICE   FACILITIES OF THE CITY:   THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE   CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY   BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,   BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.   3. AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH   CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,   STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR   MORE INFORMATION, CLICK HERE OR GO TO: HTTPS://WWW.WPB.   ORG/GOVERNMENT/ENGINEERING/ENGINEERING-FORMS-PERMITS-AN   D-APPLICATIONS .   4. PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY   OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC   RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF   YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE   MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL   IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT   [email protected] OR 561-494-1040 FOR FURTHER   ASSISTANCE.   5. PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS   OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES,   INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND   SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES,   METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE   SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING   GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS,   ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL   INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER   LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE   PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN   VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.   PLEASE SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT   MATERIAL. ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL   EXISTING AND PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT,   INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &   TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE   RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL   UTILITY CROSSINGS.   6. CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY   ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY   ROW.   7. PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE   DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB   DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION).   8. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND   PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM   AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE   PER FAC 64E-8 FOR WATER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR SEWER.   9. SHOW VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION INFORMATION   (NAVD 88 AND NGVD 29).   10. PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND   STORMWATER ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE.   11. PLEASE ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY?S   DOWNSTREAM LIFT STATION NUMBER.   12. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND   IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED   AREAS.   13. PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR   PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.   14. PLEASE LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE   APPLICABLE.   15. PLEASE PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED   LOCATION OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION.   16. COORDINATE WITH MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE   SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING   PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT   HIM AT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]   17. PROVIDE DEDICATED UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS   FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS.       THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD   CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES,   PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]:       -PROPOSED DOMESTIC BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY APPEARS TO   CONFLICT WITH BUSHES/TREES SHOWN ON LANDSCAPING AND   ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. NEED AT LEAST 18? CLEARANCE AROUND   BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY FOR MAINTENANCE.       -WATER SERVICE STANDARD DETAILS ON CIVIL PLANS ARE OLD   REVISION. PLEASE USE NEWEST REVISION.       -WATER METERS OF SIZE THREE INCHES OR LARGER NEED TO BE   INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND REFERENCING THE ABOVE-GROUND   METER STANDARD DETAIL.       -LANDSCAPING PLAN SHOWS PLANTS WHERE GREASE TRAPS ARE   LOCATED ON CIVIL PLANS.       -LANDSCAPING PLANS SHOW SOME RECTANGULAR OBJECTS TO THE   EAST OF WATER METER, BUT THEY ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE   OTHER PLANS. SIMILAR OBJECTS ARE NEAR THE NORTHEAST   CORNER. PLEASE MAKE SURE ALL SET OF PLANS SHOW THEM   ACCURATELY. THOSE OBJECTS ALSO LOOK TO CONFLICT WITH   WATER SERVICE PIPE MAINTENANCE.       -ADJUST METER MAINTENANCE BYPASS SO IT IS ON THE SOUTH   SIDE OF THE METER INSTEAD OF THE NORTH SIDE.       -FOR A THREE INCH METER THE WATER SERVICE SHOULD BE   FOUR INCH DIP. IF NEED SIX IN DIP WATER SERVICE, THEN   ADJUST METER TO SIX INCH SIZE.       -RELOCATE METER ASSEMBLY FOUR FEET EAST.       -ARE THE THREE GREASE TRAPS FOR THE 301 CLEMATIS   BUILDING OR 300 BANYAN. IF THEY ARE FOR 301 CLEMATIS,   WILL EXISTING RESTAURANT, FUTURE KITCHEN, AND FUTURE   FOOD SERVICE BE DIRECTED TO THEM?       -SHOW AND LABEL PROPOSED CLEANOUTS ON THE SEWER PLAN.       -CALLOUT DISTANCE BETWEEN DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE PIPE   AND NEARBY MANHOLE ON WATER PLAN.       -SHOW AND LABEL TAPPING VALVES AT WATER MAIN FOR FIRE   AND WATER SERVICES.       -CONSIDER DUAL/PARALLEL DOMESTIC BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES TO   MINIMIZE WATER OUTAGE DURING BACKFLOW MAINTENANCE.       -ADD WATER DEMAND CALCULATIONS TO WATER PLAN.       -CANNOT FIND DEMOLITION PLAN. PLEASE ADD THAT SHEET IF   WILL BE DEMOLITION.       -CIVIL PLANS DO NOT SHOW 301 CLEMATIS ST. PLEASE ADD   SEPARATE SHEET SHOWING WATER AND SEWER UTILITY FOR THAT   PROPERTY AND ADD WATER DEMAND CALCULATIONS. ALSO SHOW   WATER AND SEWER SERVICES.       -THERE IS A UTILITY BILLING ACCOUNT FOR A FOUR INCH   FIRELINE AT 301 CLEMATIS ST., BUT NOT SEE RECORD OF A   DCDA. MAKE SURE BUILDING DESIGN PLANS LEAVE SPACE/ROOM   FOR A FUTURE DCDA INSTALL. ALSO INDICATE IF THE FIRE   SYSTEM HAS BEEN ALTERED WITHIN THE LAST SEVEN YEARS.       -PROPOSED CANOPIES AND OTHER BUILDING STRUCTURES FOR   301 CLEMATIS APPEAR TO ENCROACH INTO THE RIGHT OF WAY   PAST THE PROPERTY LINES.       -PROPOSED DOOR NEAR NORTHWEST AREA OF 301 CLEMATIS   BUILDING PARTIALLY ENCROACHES INTO ALLEY RIGHT OF WAY.       -WILL A SEPARATE METERED IRRIGATION WATER SERVICE BE   NEEDED FOR 300 BANYAN?       -CIVIL PLANS DO NOT SHOW PAVEMENT RESTORATION FOR OLIVE   AVE. PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL THOSE BOUNDARIES AND ADD   APPROPRIATE STANDARD DETAIL.       -CURRENTLY PEDESTRIAN IN WHEELCHAIR CAN TRAVEL WEST   SIDE OF OLIVE FROM CLEMATIS TO BANYAN ON THE SIDEWALK.   WOULD THEY STILL BE ABLE TO DO THAT UPON PROJECT   COMPLETION?       -SHOW AND LABEL ALL EXISTING WATER SERVICES. ADD WHAT   IS HAPPENING TO THEM ON THE LABELS.       -DOOR CONFLICTS WITH FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY.       -HAVE THE PLANS INCORPORATED ANY CHANGES FROM THE   BANYAN STREETSCAPE PROJECT?       -WHAT IS THE ELEVATION OF CEILING OF THE TERRACE WHERE   THE FIRELINE WATER SERVICE PIPE IS RUNNING?       -PROPERTY OWNER WILL BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT BACKFLOW   COVENANT.           COMMENTS PER MIKE TECHNOW 561-494-1047 OR   [email protected] WITH ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS.       ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO THE STANDARDS:   -PLEASE SHOW EXISTING VALVES.   -PLEASE SHOW EXISTING DRY UTILITIES.   -SHOW EXISTING UTILITIES ON OLIVE.   -PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR SELECTED METER SIZE   -CALL OUT POINT OF SERVICE   -CALL OUT EASEMENTS POINT OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS.   -PROVIDE PROFILE OF EXISTING UTILITIES (WATER, SEWER,   STORM) WITHIN CITY R/W.   -PROVIDE PROFILE FOR POINT OF SERVICE.   -INCLUDE UTILITY CONFLICT/CROSSING INFO INCLUDING SOFT   DIG/TEST HOLE REPORTS   -ADD NOTE ON PLANS THAT THIS IS WITHIN THE LIFT STATION   #40 SERVICE BOUNDARY.                             Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT Rev No 2 Status P Date 10-06-2021 Cont ID   Sent By pleduc Date 10-06-2021 Time 15:05 Rev Time 0.00 Received By pleduc Date 10-06-2021 Time 15:05 Sent To   Notes 2021-10-06 15:13:49 FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES.       FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES NOT   CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.       FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT THE   APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE   REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.       PETER LEDUC   FIRE MARSHAL   561-804-4709   [email protected]     Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT Rev No 1 Status P Date 08-06-2021 Cont ID   Sent By pleduc Date 08-06-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By pleduc Date 08-06-2021 Time 10:03 Sent To   Notes 2021-08-06 10:18:07 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,   FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM   BEACH FIRE RESCUE.       THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE   DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS   ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.       THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE   PROPOSED PROJECT; HOWEVER, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE   PROVIDED AND MAY NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATIONS WHERE   APPLICABLE.       1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY   WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE   PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A   PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED   TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN   STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY   MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER   PROTECTION.       2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY   IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING   ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.       3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM   ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.   ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND   AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT   WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.       4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE   REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE   ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.       5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH   THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,   INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.       6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,   PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,   INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE   OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)       7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA   14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS   STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE   BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE   BEING CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED   TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE   PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.   IT IS RECOMMENDED FOR HIGH RISES HAVE TWO SEPARATE FDC   LOCATIONS REMOTELY LOCATED. COORDINATE THE LOCATIONS   WITH THE OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL. A FDC MAY BE   LOCATED AT THE WEST END OF THE BUILDING ON BANYAN. BOTH   FDC'S MAY BE WLAA MOUNTED TO AVOID PLACEMENT ON THE   SIDEWALKS OR LANDSCAPE AREAS.       7A. PER NFPA 14       6.4.5.4* FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED   NOT MORE THAN 100 FT (30.5 M) FROM THE NEAREST FIRE   HYDRANT CONNECTED TO AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY.       7B. PER NFPA 1       18.3 WATER SUPPLIES.       18.3.1* AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING   THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE   PROVIDED TO ALL PREMISES UPON WHICH FACILITIES,   BUILDINGS, OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS ARE HEREAFTER   CONSTRUCTED OR MOVED INTO THE JURISDICTION. THE   APPROVED WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH   SECTION 18.4.   PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004,   FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE   POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF   APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT,   CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR   AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER   SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA)   AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS   PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS.   FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE   PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?       7C. THE LOCATION OF THE DDCV FIRE LINE LOCATION SHALL   MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE   COORDINATED WITH THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S   ENGINEERS OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S   PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE.       8. A CLASS ?A? NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM   SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP   DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND   APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY   INSTALLATION.       9. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7   KEYWAY SYSTEM.   ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S   EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA   B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.   ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN   WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL   LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET   MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER   ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN   AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE   IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.       10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL   BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL   DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,   EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A   PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE   SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.       11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS   DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED   ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF   FIRE PREVENTION.   ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS   DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE   BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION.       12. COMMAND ROOM       THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1,   CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN   THE FOLLOWING FEATURES:   11.9.1 THE LOCATION, DESIGN, CONTENT, AND FIRE   DEPARTMENT ACCESS OF THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL   BE APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.       11.9.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE SEPARATED   FROM THE REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING BY A FIRE BARRIER   HAVING A FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 1   HOUR.       11.9.3 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER ROOM SHALL BE A   MINIMUM OF 96 FT2 (8.9 M2) WITH A MINIMUM DIMENSION OF   8 FT (2.4 M).       A. PER FL BLDG CODE;(MORE STRICT) IT SHALL BE A MINIMUM   OF 200 FT SQUARED WITH A MINIMUM DIMENSION OF 10 FT.   B. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.   C. A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED   ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM   D. SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL   FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF   EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING   EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS AND THE LOCATION   OF FIRE WALLS, FIRE BARRIERS, FIRE PARTITIONS, SMOKE   BARRIERS AND SMOKE PARTITIONS   E. A WORK TABLE.   F. IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN   FOR THE BUILDING.   G. THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM   CONTROL UNIT.   H. ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION OF   THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL   I. STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR DISTRIBUTION   SYSTEMS.   J. CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS SIMULTANEOUSLY   K. SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY   PANELS   L. EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS   M. FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS   N. GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND   TRANSFER FEATURES.   O. PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED   BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE   P. CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL   Q. ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME   A17.1.   R. ELEVATOR EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER SELECTOR   SWITCH(ES), WHERE EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER IS   PROVIDED       11.8.6* EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER.   11.8.6.1 AN EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE PROVIDED   IN A   LOCATION APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.   11.8.6.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL CONTAIN THE   FOLLOWING:   (1) VOICE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM PANELS AND CONTROLS   (2) FIRE DEPARTMENT TWO-WAY TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION   SERVICE   PANELS AND CONTROLS WHERE REQUIRED BY ANOTHER SECTION   OF THIS   CODE   (3) FIRE DETECTION AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATION   PANELS   (4) ELEVATOR FLOOR LOCATION AND OPERATION ANNUNCIATORS   (5) ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME   A17.1/CSA B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS AND ESCALATORS   (6) ELEVATOR EMERGENCY POWER SELECTOR SWITCH(ES) WHERE   PROVIDED   IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME A17.1/CSA B44   (7) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATERFLOW ANNUNCIATORS   (8) EMERGENCY GENERATOR STATUS INDICATORS   (9) CONTROLS FOR ANY AUTOMATIC STAIRWAY DOOR UNLOCKING   SYSTEM   (10) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS   (11) TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED   ACCESS TO THE   PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM   (12) STAIRWAY VIDEO MONITORING EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED BY   11.8.8           13. RADIO       NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY   RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.   11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM   RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT   COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL   DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.       NFPA 72, 24.9 TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT   SYSTEMS.   24.9.1 GENERAL.   24.9.1.1 NON-INTERFERENCE. NO AMPLIFICATION SYSTEM   CAPABLE   OF OPERATING ON FREQUENCIES OR CAUSING INTERFERENCE ON   FREQUENCIES   ASSIGNED TO THE JURISDICTION BY THE FCC SHALL BE   INSTALLED   WITHOUT PRIOR COORDINATION AND APPROVAL OF THE   AUTHORITY   HAVING JURISDICTION. THE BUILDING MANAGER/OWNER SHALL   SUSPEND AND CORRECT OTHER EQUIPMENT INSTALLATIONS THAT   DEGRADE   THE PERFORMANCE OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO SYSTEM OR   PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM.   24.9.1.2 APPROVAL AND PERMIT. PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED   FOR   APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. AT THE CONCLUSION OF   SUCCESSFUL   ACCEPTANCE TESTING, A RENEWABLE PERMIT SHALL BE ISSUED   FOR THE   PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM WHERE REQUIRED   BY   THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION.       THE SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL   STRENGTH OF -95 DBM FOR THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST   PALM BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT. TESTING SHALL BE BY AN   ACCEPTABLE NATIONAL STANDARD DOCUMENTING PERCENTAGES   NOTED ABOVE AND BY ACTUAL RADIO TESTING BY FIRE   PERSONNEL. IF THE MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A   BI-DIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH   A MINIMUM 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP.       PLEASE CONTACT MARK FILLA, PALM BEACH COUNTY PUBLIC   SAFETY RADIO SYSTEMS MANAGER, [email protected],   561-233-0837; AS OUR RADIOS OPERATE ON THEIR SYSTEM FOR   DETAILED RADIO FREQUENCY AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.           14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS   BUILDING.   ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS,   PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.       15. THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA   101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE PROTECTION   EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING:   THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED,   INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH   NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204,   STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY   RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR   RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY   HAVING JURISDICTION.   THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE   INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE   APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED   MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE   SYSTEM.   ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL   INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.9.       16. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT   DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.       17. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING   PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH   THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.       PETER LEDUC   FIRE MARSHAL   561-804-4709   [email protected]     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 5 Status P Date 01-21-2022 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 01-21-2022 Time 16:07 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 01-21-2022 Time 16:07 Sent To   Notes 2022-01-21 16:09:22 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.   2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE   STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND   IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.   3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF   WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A   SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.       6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE PLANTING STRIPS SHALL BE   MODIFIED TO BE CONTINUOUS AT THE SOUTH END ON THE OLIVE   AVENUE DROP OFF AND THE WEST END OF THE BANYAN BLVD   DROP OFF.       CORRECT SHEET L-7 TO REFLECT THE CONVERSION TO PLANTING   AREAS WHERE STRUCTURAL SOIL IS NOT REQUIRED. REMOVE   TREE GRATE DETAIL FROM SHEET L-4.     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 4 Status P Date 12-02-2021 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 12-02-2021 Time 15:28 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 12-02-2021 Time 15:28 Sent To   Notes 2021-12-02 15:29:19 FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER   561-822-1462   PROJECT: 300 BANYAN Z21070018   DECEMBER 2, 2021   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:           1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE   DISPOSITION PLAN:   ? SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN TO THE CHART FOR MITIGATION   SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE AND SHOW THE AMOUNT FOR EACH TREE   PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.   COLUMN SHOULD BE LABELED MITIGATION DUE, NOT TREE   CREDITS. TREES WITH A CANOPY 20 FEET OR MORE IN   DIAMETER MUST HAVE THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED   AND ENTERED ON THE CHART.   ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE   DUE.   UPDATE TOTAL WITH MITIGATION RECALCULATED FOR ABOVE.   ? CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TOTAL OF   MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED BASED ON THE PLANT   LIST.   PROVIDE A CHART WITH THE TOTAL FOR EACH SPECIES AND   REMOVE MITIGATION CALCULATIONS FROM SHEET L11, THEY ARE   INCORRECT. TREE CATEGORY LIST MUST BE USED FOR   MITIGATION CREDITS. CATEGORY 1 IS 300 SQ FT CANOPY   CREDIT, CATEGORY 2 IS 150 SQ FT CANOPY CREDIT, CATEGORY   3 IS 100 SQ FT CANOPY CREDIT, CATEGORY 4 IS 50 SQ FT   CANOPY CREDIT.       COUNTS DO NOT MATCH PLANT LIST. THERE ARE 13 LIVE OAKS,   NOT 12 (3900 SQ FT) SABAL PALMS ARE CATEGORY 3 AT 100   SQ FT EACH (400 SQ FT), 7 HOLLY AT 150 EACH (1050 SQ   FT), 2 MEDJOOL CATEGORY 3 AT 100 EACH (200 SQ FT)   TOTAL WOULD BE 8000 SQ FT, LEAVING 614SQ FT TO BE   MITIGATED BY PAYMENT IN LIEU.               2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE   TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR   RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY   EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR   POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING   CONDITION FOR ALL TREES AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR   THE NATIVE TREES. ALL INDIVIDUAL TREES NEED AN ACCURATE   REASON FOR REMOVAL PROVIDED, CANNOT BE A GENERAL   STATEMENT, SO REMOVE THE NOTE.   REMOVE NOTE ON TREE DISPOSITION SCHEDULE SHEET L1A   REGARDING REMOVAL OF TREES AS IT IS NOT ACCURATE OR   RELEVANT.   THE ARBORIST REPORT LISTS ONLY TREE #12 AS GOOD   CONDITION. PROVIDE THE REASON FOR NOT RELOCATING.       3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE PROVIDED 25%   PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR CWD-10. IDENTIFY THE TYPE   OF OPEN SPACE AS ALLOWED BY TABLE IV-7 AND DEFINITIONS   IN SECTION 94-109. SHOW HOW THE STANDARDS FOR THE TYPES   OF OPEN SPACE ARE MET FOR VEGETATED AREAS AND TREE   CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED ON TABLE IV-8.   SHOW EACH TERRACE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE SQUARE FOOTAGE AND   HOW IT INDIVIDUALLY MEETS THE 20% VEGETATED AREA. THEY   CAN SHOW THE TOTAL AREA PROVIDED, BUT EACH SPACE MUST   MEET THE REQUIREMENTS. PROVIDE ALL SQUARE FOOTAGE AND   PERCENTAGE MEASUREMENTS ON SHEET L8A.           4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET   TREES AT ONE FOR EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR   STREETSCAPE LENGTH, AND SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED PER   SECTION 94-113 AND 94-116.   STREET TREE CALCULATIONS AND PLAN NEED TO BE PROVIDED.   OLIVE AVE SIDE OF CLEMATIS BUILDING NEEDS TO BE   INCLUDED. REFERENCE THE APPROVED STREETSCAPE PLANS FOR   THE BANYAN STREETSCAPE PROJECT.   PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR EACH STREETSCAPE LENGTH   FOR BANYAN AND OLIVE ALONG 300 BANYAN AND DIVIDE BY 30   AND ROUND UP TO SHOW THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF STREET   TREES FOR EACH SIDE. PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF SHADE TREES   FOR EACH SIDE. PALMS MAY NOT BE COUNTED TOWARD SHADE   TREE REQUIREMENT. THERE IS ENOUGH ROOM TO USE LIVE OAKS   FOR ALL REQUIRED STREET TREES.       5. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF THE REQUIRED   STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE PER SECTION 94-113 AND   PROVIDE THE TYPICAL DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION. THE AREA   MUST BE 9 X14 FT PARALLEL TO THE CURB FOR EACH TREE   CONSISTING OF PLANTING AREA AND/OR STRUCTURAL SOIL.   SHOW THE LOCATIONS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.   CORRECT THE LOCATIONS TO SHOW THE STRUCTURAL SOIL ONLY   UNDER THE ADJACENT SIDEWALK.       6. SATISFIED. THERE APPEAR TO BE CONFLICTS IN SEVERAL   LOCATIONS BETWEEN PROPOSED STREET TREES AND DRAINAGE   EXFILTRATION LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. ADJUST   DRAINAGE LOCATIONS SO THEY DO NOT INFRINGE ON THE   REQUIRED PLANTING AREA OR STRUCTURAL SOIL.       7. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES ON   THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS.       8. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-113 TREE GRATES ARE ONLY   TO BE USED IF PLANTING STRIPS ARE NOT POSSIBLE.   PLANTING STRIP WITH PAVER PASS THROUGHS FOR PARKING   SPACE ACCESS ARE WARRANTED ON BANYAN. IF PARKING IS NOT   APPROVED ON BANYAN, PLANTING STRIPS MUST BE USED.   THE PLANTING AREAS NEED TO BE LENGTHENED ALONG BOTH   STREETS WITH PASS THROUGHS PLACED FOR PEDESTRIAN ACCESS   FROM THE DROP OFFS.           9. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A COMPLETE PLANT LIST. PLANT LIST   NEEDS TO BE MODIFIED TO SEPARATE THE REQUIRED OPEN   SPACE PLANT LISTS AND THE SEPARATE BUILDINGS.   LIVE OAK TREE COUNT IS INCORRECT.       10. SATISFIED. REMOVE HIGHRISE CULTIVAR AND INDICATE   SPECIES LIVE OAK OR CATHEDRAL LIVE OAK.       11. SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN FOR DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVEL   TO THE PLANT LIST.       12. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.   PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT   MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT   TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE   LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH   FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH   FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED   ON THE PLANT LIST.   REVISE AFTER ALL CHANGES ARE COMPLETE WITH LANDSCAPE   PLAN.       13. SATISFIED. PROVIDE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS ON THE CHART   AND LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE WEST AREA OF THE LOT   ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY LINE. STAFF REQUESTS ADDING   ANY LANDSCAPING SUCH AS HEDGING ALONG THE ALLEY   PROPERTY LINE TO IMPROVE THE ENVIRONMENT.   PROVIDE THE ENTIRE PROPERTY LINE LENGTH FOR THE WEST   BUFFER, DIVIDE BY 30 AND ROUND UP FOR THE REQUIRED   NUMBER OF BUFFER TREES. SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED. SABAL   PALMS ARE A 3:1 EQUIVALENT TO A REQUIRED TREE.       14. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE PLANTING   NOTES ON SHEET L10:   ? SATISFIED. CORRECT TO REMOVE CYPRESS MULCH FROM THE   NOTE, IT IS NOT ALLOWED.   ? SATISFIED. ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE NOTED TO BE   BACKFILLED WITH 50/50 MIX OR SIMILAR TO A DEPTH OF 30   INCHES.   ? SATISFIED. INDICATE ALL PLANT MATERIAL TO BE GRADE#1   OR BETTER.   CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.   2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE   STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND   IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.   3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF   WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A   SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.   4. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT, THE   TREE MITIGATION LIST SHEET L1A SHALL BE CORRECTED TO   REFLECT 800 SQ FT CREDIT FOR THE 8 WAX MYRTLES AND THE   TOTAL CORRECTED TO 6400 AND 2214 SQ FT TO BE MITIGATED   BY PAYMENT IN LIEU.       5. THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS AND AREA PLAN   SHALL BE CORRECTED TO SEPARATE THE OPEN SPACE OPEN TO   THE SKY SQUARE FOOTAGE AND THE COVERED OPEN SPACE   SQUARE FOOTAGE. VEGETATED AREA PERCENTAGE FOR EACH   SHALL BE SHOWN.       6. THE PLANTING STRIPS SHALL BE MODIFIED TO BE   CONTINUOUS AT THE SOUTH END ON THE OLIVE AVENUE DROP   OFF AND THE WEST END OF THE BANYAN BLVD DROP OFF.     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 3 Status F Date 11-15-2021 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 11-15-2021 Time 13:27 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 11-15-2021 Time 13:27 Sent To   Notes 2021-11-15 13:27:48 FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER   561-822-1462   PROJECT: 300 BANYAN Z21070018   NOVEMBER 15, 2021   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:           1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE   DISPOSITION PLAN:   ? SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN TO THE CHART FOR MITIGATION   SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE AND SHOW THE AMOUNT FOR EACH TREE   PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.   COLUMN SHOULD BE LABELED MITIGATION DUE, NOT TREE   CREDITS. TREES WITH A CANOPY 20 FEET OR MORE IN   DIAMETER MUST HAVE THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED   AND ENTERED ON THE CHART.   ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE   DUE.   UPDATE TOTAL WITH MITIGATION RECALCULATED FOR ABOVE.   ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TOTAL OF MITIGATION   SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED BASED ON THE PLANT LIST.   PROVIDE A CHART WITH THE TOTAL FOR EACH SPECIES AND   REMOVE MITIGATION CALCULATIONS FROM SHEET L11, THEY ARE   INCORRECT. TREE CATEGORY LIST MUST BE USED FOR   MITIGATION CREDITS. CATEGORY 1 IS 300 SQ FT CANOPY   CREDIT, CATEGORY 2 IS 150 SQ FT CANOPY CREDIT, CATEGORY   3 IS 100 SQ FT CANOPY CREDIT, CATEGORY 4 IS 50 SQ FT   CANOPY CREDIT.       COUNTS DO NOT MATCH PLANT LIST. THERE ARE 13 LIVE OAKS,   NOT 12 (3900 SQ FT) SABAL PALMS ARE CATEGORY 3 AT 100   SQ FT EACH (400 SQ FT), 7 HOLLY AT 150 EACH (1050 SQ   FT), 2 MEDJOOL CATEGORY 3 AT 100 EACH (200 SQ FT)   TOTAL WOULD BE 8000 SQ FT, LEAVING 614SQ FT TO BE   MITIGATED BY PAYMENT IN LIEU.       2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE   TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR   RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY   EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR   POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING   CONDITION FOR ALL TREES AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR   THE NATIVE TREES. ALL INDIVIDUAL TREES NEED AN ACCURATE   REASON FOR REMOVAL PROVIDED, CANNOT BE A GENERAL   STATEMENT, SO REMOVE THE NOTE.   REMOVE NOTE ON TREE DISPOSITION SCHEDULE SHEET L1A   REGARDING REMOVAL OF TREES AS IT IS NOT ACCURATE OR   RELEVANT.   THE ARBORIST REPORT LISTS ONLY TREE #12 AS GOOD   CONDITION. PROVIDE THE REASON FOR NOT RELOCATING.       3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE PROVIDED 25%   PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR CWD-10. IDENTIFY THE TYPE   OF OPEN SPACE AS ALLOWED BY TABLE IV-7 AND DEFINITIONS   IN SECTION 94-109. SHOW HOW THE STANDARDS FOR THE TYPES   OF OPEN SPACE ARE MET FOR VEGETATED AREAS AND TREE   CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED ON TABLE IV-8.   SHOW EACH TERRACE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE SQUARE FOOTAGE AND   HOW IT INDIVIDUALLY MEETS THE 20% VEGETATED AREA. THEY   CAN SHOW THE TOTAL AREA PROVIDED, BUT EACH SPACE MUST   MEET THE REQUIREMENTS. PROVIDE ALL SQUARE FOOTAGE AND   PERCENTAGE MEASUREMENTS ON SHEET L8A.           4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET   TREES AT ONE FOR EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR   STREETSCAPE LENGTH, AND SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED PER   SECTION 94-113 AND 94-116.   STREET TREE CALCULATIONS AND PLAN NEED TO BE PROVIDED.   OLIVE AVE SIDE OF CLEMATIS BUILDING NEEDS TO BE   INCLUDED. REFERENCE THE APPROVED STREETSCAPE PLANS FOR   THE BANYAN STREETSCAPE PROJECT.   PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR EACH STREETSCAPE LENGTH   FOR BANYAN AND OLIVE ALONG 300 BANYAN AND DIVIDE BY 30   AND ROUND UP TO SHOW THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF STREET   TREES FOR EACH SIDE. PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF SHADE TREES   FOR EACH SIDE. PALMS MAY NOT BE COUNTED TOWARD SHADE   TREE REQUIREMENT. THERE IS ENOUGH ROOM TO USE LIVE OAKS   FOR ALL REQUIRED STREET TREES.       5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF THE   REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE PER SECTION   94-113 AND PROVIDE THE TYPICAL DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION.   THE AREA MUST BE 9 X14 FT PARALLEL TO THE CURB FOR EACH   TREE CONSISTING OF PLANTING AREA AND/OR STRUCTURAL   SOIL.   SHOW THE LOCATIONS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.   CORRECT THE LOCATIONS TO SHOW THE STRUCTURAL SOIL ONLY   UNDER THE ADJACENT SIDEWALK.       6. SATISFIED. THERE APPEAR TO BE CONFLICTS IN SEVERAL   LOCATIONS BETWEEN PROPOSED STREET TREES AND DRAINAGE   EXFILTRATION LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. ADJUST   DRAINAGE LOCATIONS SO THEY DO NOT INFRINGE ON THE   REQUIRED PLANTING AREA OR STRUCTURAL SOIL.       7. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES ON   THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS.       8. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-113 TREE GRATES ARE ONLY   TO BE USED IF PLANTING STRIPS ARE NOT POSSIBLE.   PLANTING STRIP WITH PAVER PASS THROUGHS FOR PARKING   SPACE ACCESS ARE WARRANTED ON BANYAN. IF PARKING IS NOT   APPROVED ON BANYAN, PLANTING STRIPS MUST BE USED.   THE PLANTING AREAS NEED TO BE LENGTHENED ALONG BOTH   STREETS WITH PASS THROUGHS PLACED FOR PEDESTRIAN ACCESS   FROM THE DROP OFFS.           9. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A COMPLETE PLANT LIST.   PLANT LIST NEEDS TO BE MODIFIED TO SEPARATE THE   REQUIRED OPEN SPACE PLANT LISTS AND THE SEPARATE   BUILDINGS.   LIVE OAK TREE COUNT IS INCORRECT.       10. SATISFIED. REMOVE HIGHRISE CULTIVAR AND INDICATE   SPECIES LIVE OAK OR CATHEDRAL LIVE OAK.       11. SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN FOR DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVEL   TO THE PLANT LIST.       12. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.   PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT   MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT   TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE   LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH   FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH   FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED   ON THE PLANT LIST.   REVISE AFTER ALL CHANGES ARE COMPLETE WITH LANDSCAPE   PLAN.       13. SATISFIED. PROVIDE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS ON THE CHART   AND LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE WEST AREA OF THE LOT   ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY LINE. STAFF REQUESTS ADDING   ANY LANDSCAPING SUCH AS HEDGING ALONG THE ALLEY   PROPERTY LINE TO IMPROVE THE ENVIRONMENT.   PROVIDE THE ENTIRE PROPERTY LINE LENGTH FOR THE WEST   BUFFER, DIVIDE BY 30 AND ROUND UP FOR THE REQUIRED   NUMBER OF BUFFER TREES. SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED. SABAL   PALMS ARE A 3:1 EQUIVALENT TO A REQUIRED TREE.       14. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE PLANTING   NOTES ON SHEET L10:   ? SATISFIED. CORRECT TO REMOVE CYPRESS MULCH FROM THE   NOTE, IT IS NOT ALLOWED.   ? SATISFIED. ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE NOTED TO BE   BACKFILLED WITH 50/50 MIX OR SIMILAR TO A DEPTH OF 30   INCHES.   ? SATISFIED. INDICATE ALL PLANT MATERIAL TO BE GRADE#1   OR BETTER.   CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.   2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE   STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND   IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.   3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF   WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A   SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-15-2021 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 10-15-2021 Time 15:41 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 10-15-2021 Time 15:41 Sent To   Notes 2021-10-15 15:41:37 FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER   561-822-1462   PROJECT: 300 BANYAN Z21070018   OCTOBER 15, 2021   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:           1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE   DISPOSITION PLAN:   ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN TO THE CHART FOR   MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE AND SHOW THE AMOUNT FOR   EACH TREE PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.   COLUMN SHOULD BE LABELED MITIGATION DUE, NOT TREE   CREDITS. TREES WITH A CANOPY 20 FEET OR MORE IN   DIAMETER MUST HAVE THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED   AND ENTERED ON THE CHART.   ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE TOTAL OF MITIGATION   SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE.   UPDATE TOTAL WITH MITIGATION RECALCULATED FOR ABOVE.   ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TOTAL OF MITIGATION   SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED BASED ON THE PLANT LIST.   PROVIDE A CHART WITH THE TOTAL FOR EACH SPECIES AND   REMOVE MITIGATION CALCULATIONS FROM SHEET L11, THEY ARE   INCORRECT. TREE CATEGORY LIST MUST BE USED FOR   MITIGATION CREDITS. CATEGORY 1 IS 300 SQ FT CANOPY   CREDIT, CATEGORY 2 IS 150 SQ FT CANOPY CREDIT, CATEGORY   3 IS 100 SQ FT CANOPY CREDIT, CATEGORY 4 IS 50 SQ FT   CANOPY CREDIT,       2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES   NATIVE TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE   OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY   EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR   POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING   CONDITION FOR ALL TREES AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR   THE NATIVE TREES. ALL INDIVIDUAL TREES NEED AN ACCURATE   REASON FOR REMOVAL PROVIDED, CANNOT BE A GENERAL   STATEMENT, SO REMOVE THE NOTE.   REMOVE NOTE ON TREE DISPOSITION SCHEDULE SHEET L1A   REGARDING REMOVAL OF TREES AS IT IS NOT ACCURATE OR   RELEVANT.   THE ARBORIST REPORT LISTS ONLY TREE #12 AS GOOD   CONDITION. PROVIDE THE REASON FOR NOT RELOCATING.       3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE   PROVIDED 25% PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR CWD-10.   IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE AS ALLOWED BY TABLE   IV-7 AND DEFINITIONS IN SECTION 94-109. SHOW HOW THE   STANDARDS FOR THE TYPES OF OPEN SPACE ARE MET FOR   VEGETATED AREAS AND TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED ON   TABLE IV-8.   SHOW EACH TERRACE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE SQUARE FOOTAGE AND   HOW IT INDIVIDUALLY MEETS THE 20% VEGETATED AREA. THEY   CAN SHOW THE TOTAL AREA PROVIDED, BUT EACH SPACE MUST   MEET THE REQUIREMENTS. PROVIDE ALL SQUARE FOOTAGE AND   PERCENTAGE MEASUREMENTS ON SHEET L8A.           4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR   REQUIRED STREET TREES AT ONE FOR EVERY 30 FEET OR   PORTION THEREOF FOR STREETSCAPE LENGTH, AND SHOW THE   NUMBER PROVIDED PER SECTION 94-113 AND 94-116.   STREET TREE CALCULATIONS AND PLAN NEED TO BE PROVIDED.   OLIVE AVE SIDE OF CLEMATIS BUILDING NEEDS TO BE   INCLUDED. REFERENCE THE APPROVED STREETSCAPE PLANS FOR   THE BANYAN STREETSCAPE PROJECT.   PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR EACH STREETSCAPE LENGTH   FOR BANYAN AND OLIVE ALONG 300 BANYAN AND DIVIDE BY 30   AND ROUND UP TO SHOW THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF STREET   TREES FOR EACH SIDE. PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF SHADE TREES   FOR EACH SIDE. PALMS MAY NOT BE COUNTED TOWARD SHADE   TREE REQUIREMENT. THERE IS ENOUGH ROOM TO USE LIVE OAKS   FOR ALL REQUIRED STREET TREES.       5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF THE   REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE PER SECTION   94-113 AND PROVIDE THE TYPICAL DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION.   THE AREA MUST BE 9 X14 FT PARALLEL TO THE CURB FOR EACH   TREE CONSISTING OF PLANTING AREA AND/OR STRUCTURAL   SOIL.   SHOW THE LOCATIONS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.       6. SATISFIED. THERE APPEAR TO BE CONFLICTS IN SEVERAL   LOCATIONS BETWEEN PROPOSED STREET TREES AND DRAINAGE   EXFILTRATION LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. ADJUST   DRAINAGE LOCATIONS SO THEY DO NOT INFRINGE ON THE   REQUIRED PLANTING AREA OR STRUCTURAL SOIL.       7. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES ON   THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS.       8. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-113 TREE GRATES   ARE ONLY TO BE USED IF PLANTING STRIPS ARE NOT   POSSIBLE. PLANTING STRIP WITH PAVER PASS THROUGHS FOR   PARKING SPACE ACCESS ARE WARRANTED ON BANYAN. IF   PARKING IS NOT APPROVED ON BANYAN, PLANTING STRIPS MUST   BE USED.   THE PLANTING AREAS NEED TO BE LENGTHENED ALONG BOTH   STREETS WITH PASS THROUGHS PLACED FOR PEDESTRIAN ACCESS   FROM THE DROP OFFS.           9. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A COMPLETE PLANT LIST.   PLANT LIST NEEDS TO BE MODIFIED TO SEPARATE THE   REQUIRED OPEN SPACE PLANT LISTS AND THE SEPARATE   BUILDINGS.       10. SATISFIED. REMOVE HIGHRISE CULTIVAR AND INDICATE   SPECIES LIVE OAK OR CATHEDRAL LIVE OAK.       11. SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN FOR DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVEL   TO THE PLANT LIST.       12. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION   94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF   PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT   TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE   LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH   FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH   FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED   ON THE PLANT LIST.   REVISE AFTER ALL CHANGES ARE COMPLETE WITH LANDSCAPE   PLAN.       13. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS ON   THE CHART AND LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE WEST AREA OF THE   LOT ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY LINE. STAFF REQUESTS   ADDING ANY LANDSCAPING SUCH AS HEDGING ALONG THE ALLEY   PROPERTY LINE TO IMPROVE THE ENVIRONMENT.   PROVIDE THE ENTIRE PROPERTY LINE LENGTH FOR THE WEST   BUFFER, DIVIDE BY 30 AND ROUND UP FOR THE REQUIRED   NUMBER OF BUFFER TREES. SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED. SABAL   PALMS ARE A 3:1 EQUIVALENT TO A REQUIRED TREE.       14. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE PLANTING   NOTES ON SHEET L10:   ? SATISFIED. CORRECT TO REMOVE CYPRESS MULCH FROM THE   NOTE, IT IS NOT ALLOWED.   ? SATISFIED. ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE NOTED TO BE   BACKFILLED WITH 50/50 MIX OR SIMILAR TO A DEPTH OF 30   INCHES.   ? SATISFIED. INDICATE ALL PLANT MATERIAL TO BE GRADE#1   OR BETTER.   CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.   2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE   STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND   IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.   3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF   WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A   SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-11-2021 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 08-11-2021 Time 15:45 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 08-11-2021 Time 15:45 Sent To   Notes 2021-08-11 15:46:25 FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER   561-822-1462   PROJECT: 300 BANYAN Z21070018   AUGUST 10, 2021   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:           1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE   DISPOSITION PLAN:   ? ADD A COLUMN TO THE CHART FOR MITIGATION SQUARE   FOOTAGE DUE AND SHOW THE AMOUNT FOR EACH TREE PROPOSED   TO BE REMOVED.   ? PROVIDE TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE.   ? PROVIDE A TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED   BASED ON THE PLANT LIST.       2. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES IN GOOD   CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A   300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY   RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION.   PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING CONDITION FOR ALL   TREES AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE TREES.   ALL INDIVIDUAL TREES NEED AN ACCURATE REASON FOR   REMOVAL PROVIDED, CANNOT BE A GENERAL STATEMENT, SO   REMOVE THE NOTE.           3. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE PROVIDED 25% PRIVATE OPEN   SPACE AREAS FOR CWD-10. IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE   AS ALLOWED BY TABLE IV-7 AND DEFINITIONS IN SECTION   94-109. SHOW HOW THE STANDARDS FOR THE TYPES OF OPEN   SPACE ARE MET FOR VEGETATED AREAS AND TREE CANOPY   SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED ON TABLE IV-8.           4. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET TREES AT   ONE FOR EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR   STREETSCAPE LENGTH, AND SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED PER   SECTION 94-113 AND 94-116.   STREET TREE CALCULATIONS AND PLAN NEED TO BE PROVIDED.   OLIVE AVE SIDE OF CLEMATIS BUILDING NEEDS TO BE   INCLUDED. REFERENCE THE APPROVED STREETSCAPE PLANS FOR   THE BANYAN STREETSCAPE PROJECT.       5. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF THE REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL   UNDER HARDSCAPE PER SECTION 94-113 AND PROVIDE THE   TYPICAL DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION. THE AREA MUST BE 9 X14   FT PARALLEL TO THE CURB FOR EACH TREE CONSISTING OF   PLANTING AREA AND/OR STRUCTURAL SOIL.       6. THERE APPEAR TO BE CONFLICTS IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS   BETWEEN PROPOSED STREET TREES AND DRAINAGE EXFILTRATION   LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. ADJUST DRAINAGE LOCATIONS   SO THEY DO NOT INFRINGE ON THE REQUIRED PLANTING AREA   OR STRUCTURAL SOIL.       7. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE   PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS.       8. PER SECTION 94-113 TREE GRATES ARE ONLY TO BE USED   IF PLANTING STRIPS ARE NOT POSSIBLE. PLANTING STRIP   WITH PAVER PASS THROUGHS FOR PARKING SPACE ACCESS ARE   WARRANTED ON BANYAN. IF PARKING IS NOT APPROVED ON   BANYAN, PLANTING STRIPS MUST BE USED.       9. PROVIDE A COMPLETE PLANT LIST. PLANT LIST NEEDS TO   BE MODIFIED TO SEPARATE THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE PLANT   LISTS AND THE SEPARATE BUILDINGS.       10. REMOVE HIGHRISE CULTIVAR AND INDICATE SPECIES LIVE   OAK OR CATHEDRAL LIVE OAK.       11. ADD A COLUMN FOR DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVEL TO THE   PLANT LIST.       12. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT   SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL   ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT   SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF   SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA   WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA   LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED ON THE   PLANT LIST.   REVISE AFTER ALL CHANGES ARE COMPLETE WITH LANDSCAPE   PLAN.       13. PROVIDE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS ON THE CHART AND   LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE WEST AREA OF THE LOT ADJACENT TO   THE PROPERTY LINE. STAFF REQUESTS ADDING ANY   LANDSCAPING SUCH AS HEDGING ALONG THE ALLEY PROPERTY   LINE TO IMPROVE THE ENVIRONMENT.       14. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE PLANTING   NOTES ON SHEET L10:   ? CORRECT TO REMOVE CYPRESS MULCH FROM THE NOTE, IT IS   NOT ALLOWED.   ? ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE NOTED TO BE BACKFILLED   WITH 50/50 MIX OR SIMILAR TO A DEPTH OF 30 INCHES.   ? INDICATE ALL PLANT MATERIAL TO BE GRADE#1 OR BETTER.   CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.     Review Stop PARK PARKING Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time   Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop POLICE POLICE Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time   Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-21-2022 Cont ID   Sent By mtechnow Date 01-21-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By rrossano Date 01-21-2022 Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-01-21 19:50:35 COMMENTS FOR THE REFERENCED PROJECT:       -SHOW EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ON OLIVE AVE AND   IN THE ALLEY.   -ADD NOTE/CALL OUT PROPOSED AND EXISTING UTILITY   CONFLICTS WITH ELEVATIONS.   -PROFILE OF PROPOSED SERVICE LINES SHOWING ELEVATIONS   AND CONFLICTS FROM TAP TO POINT OF SERVICE WILL BE   REQUIRED.   - ADD NOTE THAT WATER MAIN TIE-IN IS TO PROCEED AFTER   THE CONTRACTOR HAS SUBMITTED A CONSTRUCTION PHASING   PLAN FOR PIGGING/FLUSHING TO THE CITY AND RECEIVING PBC   HEALTH DEPARTMENT APPROVAL.   -INSERT COWPB STANDARD DETAIL GS-7 ?DOGHOUSE MANHOLE?   ON DETAIL SHEET.   -THE GRAVITY SEWER IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A CASING THROUGH   THE CONFLICT MANHOLE. INSERT COWPB STANDARD DETAIL P-10   FOR THE CASING AND THE FDOT CONFLICT MANHOLE STANDARD   DETAIL INDEX 425-080 INTO THE PLANS.     Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS Rev No 2 Status P Date 09-29-2021 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 09-29-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date 09-29-2021 Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-09-29 15:44:19 CONDITION OF APPROVAL:   1- THE SANITATION CONTAINERS SHALL BE FRONT LOAD TYPE   IN ORDER FOR THE CITY COLLECTION TRUCKS BE ABLE TO   PROVIDE THE SERVICE.       MATT HEJAZI   DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS   [email protected] Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-02-2021 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 08-02-2021 Time   Rev Time   Received By   Date 08-02-2021 Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-08-02 15:02:12 PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:   1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID   WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE, TYPE AND   QUANTITY OF THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR)   THAT WILL BE UTILIZED THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE   SANITATION SERVICE.   2- DETAILS FOR SANITATION SERVICE (I.E. SOLID WASTE   CONTAINER(S) TYPE, COLLECTION LOCATION, TRASH ROOM   SPECS, ETC.).   3- AUTOTURN EXHIBIT (DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE VEHICLE?S   WHEEL PATH) FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER   TRUCK WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECS:   - DUAL AXLES   - TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT   - TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT   - TURNING RADIUS:   - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT   - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT   - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT           MATT HEJAZI   DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS   [email protected]   561-822-2045 Review Stop STORM STORMWATER Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-12-2021 Cont ID   Sent By tward Date 08-12-2021 Time 09:24 Rev Time 0.00 Received By tward Date 08-12-2021 Time 09:26 Sent To   Notes 2021-08-12 09:24:42 THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL   DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION   PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE   ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT   APPLICATION PROCESSES.       THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE   PLAN APPROVAL:       1. THE CITY'S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM PER CITY CODE IS   NGVD1929. THE CITY IS ALLOWING SURVEYS AND PLANS TO USE   NAVD1988 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION EQUATION BETWEEN   NAVD1988 AND NGVD1929 IS ALSO PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE   CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 ON THE SURVEY.       2. PROVIDE PIPE MATERIAL, PIPE INVERTS OF EXISTING   DRAINAGE SYSTEM IN THE PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY.       3. THE STORM PIPE ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE APPEARS   TO BE LOCATED UNDER THE PROPOSED BUILDING.       4. DO NOT CONNECT THE ONSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM FOR 300   BANYAN TO THE EXISTING ALLEY DRAINAGE SYSTEM.       5. EXPLORE CONNECTING THE ROOF DRAINS IN THE ALLEY FOR   301 CLEMATIS TO THE ALLEY DRAINAGE SYSTEM.       6. INDICATE IF THE EXISTING ELECTRICAL CONDUITS WILL   REMAIN ONSITE.       7. MOVE SANITARY MH2 OUT OF THE ALLEY R/W.       8. ON THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN, SHOW INLET PROTECTION   FOR DRAINAGE STRUCTURES WITH THE R/W.       9. PROVIDE DETAIL FOR SPECIAL TYPE 'F' CURB AND GUTTER   USED IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA.       10. PROVIDE TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS FROM THE FACE OF   BUILDING TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE R/W.       11. PROVIDE CROSS SECTION OF THE ALLEY FROM BUILDING   FACE TO BUILDING FACE.       12. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP   CRITERIA.       13. THE CITY DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF BLEEDERS IN   CONTROL STRUCTURES USED TO SURCHARGE EXFILTRATION   TRENCHES.       14. CONSIDER ALTERNATIVE STORMWATER STORAGE SYSTEM.   EXFILTRATION SYSTEMS CAN HAVE A SHORT LIFE SPAN.       15. COORDINATE DESIGN WITH THE BANYAN BLVD STREETSCAPE   PROJECT.       THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO   ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING   BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.       1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY   BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.       2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED   WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.       3. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP PERMIT(S) BEFORE START OF   CONSTRUCTION.       4. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WITH THE   ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.       TRACY WARD, PE   SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT   561-494-1120 (O)   561-351-0510 (M)   [email protected]     Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-14-2021 Cont ID   Sent By vnoel Date 10-14-2021 Time 07:22 Rev Time 0.00 Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-10-14 07:30:34 1. ELEVATIONS SHOW ENCROACHMENTS INTO RIGHTS-OF-WAY.   AERIAL ENCROACHMENT EASEMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED. NO   BUILDING ENCROACHMENTS ARE PERMITTED.   2. REPLAT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT REQUIRED PRIOR TO   C.O. Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-10-2021 Cont ID   Sent By vnoel Date 08-10-2021 Time 13:04 Rev Time   Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-08-10 13:19:18 1. REVISE SURVEY TO REMOVE PORTION OF OLIVE AVE. TAKEN   BY MAINTENANCE MAP. REVISE ACREAGE AND PLANS   ACCORDINGLY.   2. SHOW DEED AND EASEMENT ALONG BANYAN BLVD. IN AREA OF   MAINTENANCE MAP.   3. REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED.   4, MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR   IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN RIGHT-OF-WAYS. Review Stop THRESHOLD THRESHOLD INSPECTOR DOCUMENTS Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 3 Status F Date 12-22-2021 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 12-22-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-12-22 18:04:25 TRAFFIC COMMENTS   1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER. IT WAS NOT   PROVIDED IN THE LATEST RE-SUBMISSION.   2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE SITE PLAN WITH PROPOSED   TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (I.E. ROAD, SIDEWALK, CURB,   DRIVEWAY) PROPERLY LABELED AND EXACT WIDTHS SHOWCASED.   IF ALREADY PROVIDED, PLEASE INDICATE SPECIFIC FILE NAME   AND/OR SHEET NUMBER(S). LATEST RE-SUBMISSION DID NOT   INDICATE ANY FILE NOR SHEET NUMBER.   3) SATISFIED. CONSIDER DESIGNATING THE ALLEY AS ONE-WAY   AND COORDINATE WITH SANITATION PERTAINING BEST   DIRECTION. AFTER INTERNAL CONSULTATION WITH SANITATION,   THE ALLEYWAY SHALL BE DESIGNATED ONE-WAY EASTBOUND   4) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A WIDER SIDEWALK ALONG OLIVE   AVENUE. PLEASE REFER TO COMMENT #2.   5) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC   CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE   OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED   DEVELOPMENT. LATEST CIVIL DRAWINGS DO NOT SHOW THE   REQUESTED FEATURES   6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE   TRUCK AND SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE   PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES   CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A   SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. UPDATE ANALYSIS ASSUMING   ALLEYWAY DESIGNATION AS ONE-WAY EASTBOUND.   7) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY   ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20   FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS   (CIRCUIT BOX AND ELECTRIC CONDUIT). PROVIDE FILE   NAME/SHEET NUMBER, CLEARLY MARK AND PLACE A CALLOUT FOR   THE AREA.   8) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE   NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,   INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES   9) SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE AN INTERSECTION ANALYSIS   FOR THE BANYAN AND DIXIE INTERSECTION. FUTURE   CONDITIONS SHALL ASSUME BANYAN BLVD COMPLETE STREET   CONFIGURATION   10) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SETUP A MEETING WITH PLANNING   AND ENGINEERING TO DISCUSS TRANSPORTATION DEMAND   MANAGEMENT MEASURES, AS THE TRIPS GENERATED BY THE   PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ARE EXCEEDING THE CAPACITY   ESTIMATED BY THE BANYAN BOULEVARD COMPLETE STREET   PROJECT. PROVIDE A DRAFT TDM DOCUMENT AND REACH MUTUAL   AGREEMENT ON THE PROPOSED MEASURES.           VALERIO ORICCHIO   CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER   561-494-1092   [email protected]     Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-14-2021 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 10-14-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-10-14 18:52:37 1) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER. IT WAS NOT   PROVIDED IN THE LATEST RE-SUBMISISON.   2) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE SITE PLAN WITH PROPOSED   TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (I.E. ROAD, SIDEWALK, CURB,   DRIVEWAY) PROPERLY LABELED AND EXACT WIDTHS SHOWCASED.   IF ALREADY PROVIDED, PLEASE INDICATE SPECIFIC FILE NAME   AND/OR SHEET NUMBER(S). LATEST RE-SUBMISSION DID NOT   INDICATE ANY FILE NOR SHEET NUMBER.   3) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. CONSIDER DESIGNATING THE ALLEY   AS ONE-WAY AND COORDINATE WITH SANITATION PERTAINING   BEST DIRECTION. AFTER INTERNAL CONSULTATION WITH   SANITATION, THE ALLEYWAY SHALL BE DESIGNATED ONE-WAY   EASTBOUND   4) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A WIDER SIDEWALK ALONG   OLIVE AVENUE. PLEASE REFER TO COMMENT #2.   5) NOT SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE   BASIC CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS)   ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE   PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. LATEST CIVIL DRAWINGS DO NOT SHOW   THE REQUESTED FEATURES   6) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR   GARBAGE TRUCK AND SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT   OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC   ENVELOPES CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED   IN A SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. UPDATE ANALYSIS ASSUMING   ALLEYWAY DESIGNATION AS ONE-WAY EASTBOUND.   7) NOT SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY   ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20   FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS   (CIRCUIT BOX AND ELECTRIC CONDUIT). PROVIDE FILE   NAME/SHEET NUMBER, CLEARLY MARK AND PLACE A CALLOUT FOR   THE AREA.   8) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE   NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,   INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES   9) PLEASE PROVIDE AN INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR THE   BANYAN AND DIXIE INTERSECTION. FUTURE CONDITIONS SHALL   ASSUME BANYAN BLVD COMPLETE STREET CONFIGURATION   10) SETUP A MEETING WITH PLANNING AND ENGINEERING TO   DISCUSS TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT MEASURES, AS   THE TRIPS GENERATED BY THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ARE   EXCEEDING THE CAPACITY ESTIMATED BY THE BANYAN   BOULEVARD COMPLETE STREET PROJECT       VALERIO ORICCHIO   CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER   561-494-1092   [email protected]     Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-12-2021 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 08-12-2021 Time   Rev Time   Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-08-12 12:39:33 TRAFFIC COMMENTS   1) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER   2) PROVIDE SITE PLAN WITH PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION   FEATURES (I.E. ROAD, SIDEWALK, CURB, DRIVEWAY) PROPERLY   LABELED AND EXACT WIDTHS SHOWCASED. IF ALREADY   PROVIDED, PLEASE INDICATE SPECIFIC FILE NAME AND/OR   SHEET NUMBER(S)   3) CONSIDER DESIGNATING THE ALLEY AS ONE-WAY AND   COORDINATE WITH SANITATION PERTAINING BEST DIRECTION   4) PROVIDE A WIDER SIDEWALK ALONG OLIVE AVENUE   5) ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS   (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE   OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT   6) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND   SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED   DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES CLEARLY   DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE   FILE/DRAWING   7) IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY ACCESSIBLE   MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 FEET) AND   PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS (CIRCUIT BOX   AND ELECTRIC CONDUIT)   8) PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF   REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA   AND BICYCLE ONES       VALERIO ORICCHIO   CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER   561-494-1092   [email protected]     Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 5 Status P Date 01-26-2022 Cont ID   Sent By aaponte Date 01-26-2022 Time 14:23 Rev Time 0.00 Received By aaponte Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2022-01-26 14:24:03 PASSED WITH CONDITONOS OF APPROVAL AS INCLUDED IN SITE   PLAN APPROVAL LETTER AND DAC FINAL ORDER. Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 4 Status F Date 12-17-2021 Cont ID   Sent By aaponte Date 12-17-2021 Time 16:57 Rev Time 0.00 Received By aaponte Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-12-17 17:07:19 1. PLEASE ADJUST GROUND FLOOR PLAN TO REFLECT THAT THE   ENCLOSURE OF THE AREA LABELED AS CAFE IS AN OPEN FENCE   OR THE SPACE SHALL BE COUNTED AS GBA.   2. PLEASE UPDATE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO REFLECT DAC   CONDITION OF APPROVAL.   3. PLEASE ADJUST SITE PLAN AND CIVIL DRAWINGS TO   REFLECT THAT THE SIDEWALK ELEVATION WILL BE MAINTAINED   ACROSS THE GARAGE DRIVEWAY. Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 3 Status F Date 11-18-2021 Cont ID   Sent By ckimmerl Date 11-18-2021 Time 16:14 Rev Time 0.00 Received By ckimmerl Date 11-18-2021 Time 16:14 Sent To   Notes 2021-11-18 16:14:22 SETBACKS:   1. BANYAN BOULEVARD 16? SETBACK NOT MET, APPEARS TO BE   14? IN DRAWINGS.   [NOT SATISFIED] MINIMUM SETBACK SHALL BE 16? FROM NEW   BACK OF CURB WITH BANYAN STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS,   DRAWINGS SHOW ~ 15? SETBACK. SUGGEST SHORTENING THE   WIDTH OF DROP-OFF TO ADJUST PROMINENT CURB LINE FROM   WHICH THE SETBACK IS MEASURED OR MAKE THE DROP-OFF AREA   NARROWER. ALTERNATIVE TO ASK FOR 5% VARIANCE ON   SETBACK.   2. PLEASE CLEARLY INDICATE SETBACK LINE IN ALL FLOOR   PLANS, ELEVATIONS, AND SECTIONS TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE.   [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SHEET A-1 SITE PLAN COULD ALSO   INCLUDE SETBACK LINES.       OPEN SPACE:   3. PLEASE UPDATE TABLE IN SHEET L4 TO REFLECT THAT THE   PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS CALCULATED FOR THE TWO SITES.   [NOT SATISFIED] 25% OF THE LOT AREA MUST BE PRIVATE   OPEN SPACE. PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS REQUIRED TO BE ?OPEN   TO THE SKY?. PLEASE PROVIDE BREAKDOWN OF 7TH FLOOR,   10TH FLOOR, AND ROOFTOP TERRACES. CALCULATE WHAT   PERCENTAGE OF THESE TERRACES CONSTITUTE AS PRIVATE OPEN   SPACE THAT IS OPEN TO THE SKY. 20% OF EACH COMPONENT OF   THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE MUST BE VEGETATED. MAY REQUIRE   VARIANCE.       ACTIVE USE:   4. MINOR TEXT ERROR, BOTH BANYAN AND OLIVE ARE PRIMARY   PEDESTRIAN STREETS IN THIS AREA (SHEET A-1 REFERS TO   OLIVE AS AN AVENUE).   [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] MINOR TEXT ERROR, BANYAN ACTIVE   USE REQUIRED LINER (2-3 STORY) IS 60% NOT 50%.   5. WILL REQUIRE VARIANCE FOR GROUND LEVEL ACTIVE USE   REQUIREMENT ALONG OLIVE; REQUIRED 80% OF FRONTAGE;   PROVIDED 62% (VARIANCE OF 18% OR 48.75? DIFFERENCE)   [SATISFIED] VARIANCE IS REQUESTED.   6. WILL REQUIRE VARIANCE FOR GROUND LEVEL ACTIVE USE   REQUIREMENT ALONG BANYAN; REQUIRED 65% OF FRONTAGE;   PROVIDED 46% (VARIANCE OF 19% OR 30.92? DIFFERENCE)   [SATISFIED] VARIANCE IS REQUESTED.   7. PLEASE INCLUDE GRAPHIC CALCULATIONS FOR THE ACTIVE   USE REQUIREMENTS INDICATING IN THE FLOOR PLAN WHAT IS   BEING COUNTED AND THE RESULTING PERCENTAGES. PLEASE   REVISE THE CALCULATED FRONTAGES AND PERCENTAGES OF   ACTIVE USE BASED ON THE BUILDABLE LOT FRONTAGE.   [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] ALLEY SHOULD NOT BE COUNTED AS   ACTIVE USE. PLEASE INDICATE OUTDOOR DINING/PATIO ALONG   OLIVE AND BANYAN AS AN ACTIVE USE ALTERNATIVE.   8. PROPOSED PROJECT IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM   LINER ACTIVE USES [2 TO 3 STORIES (44?)] WHICH REQUIRES   60%.   [SATISFIED] VARIANCE IS REQUESTED.   9. WILL REQUIRE VARIANCE FOR 2ND AND 3RD STORY ACTIVE   USE LINER REQUIREMENT ALONG OLIVE AVE AND BANYAN BLVD;   REQUIRED 60%; PROVIDED 0% (VARIANCE OF 60%)   [SATISFIED] VARIANCE IS REQUESTED.   10. THE 1ST STORY IS A DOUBLE HEIGHT AND IT WILL BE   COUNTED AS ONE LEVEL.   [SATISFIED]   11. THE ADDITIONAL ENHANCED TREATMENT OF NORTH FACADE   PREVIOUSLY DISCUSSED WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE SUBMITTED   DRAWINGS.   [SATISFIED]       STREETSCAPE:   12. ONGOING COORDINATION IS STILL NEEDED (FOR BANYAN   STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS).   [NOT SATISFIED] ONGOING   13. DISCUSSIONS ONGOING, DETAILS AND ACTIONS TO BE   DETERMINED (FOR SIDEWALK WIDENING).   [SATISFIED] DETERMINED SIDEWALK EXTENSION ALONG OLIVE   ON 301 IS NOT FEASIBLE.   14. STAFF RECOMMENDS REDUCING THE DROP-OFF ON OLIVE   AVE. TO 10? IN WIDTH. FURTHER DISCUSSION NEEDED WITH   TRAFFIC ENGINEER.   [SATISFIED] STREET TREE LOCATIONS WILL BE SLIGHTLY   ADJUSTED AS PER OUR LAST DISCUSSION; REQUIRED NUMBER OF   TREES IS MET. TRAFFIC ENGINEER IS OKAY WITH DROP OFF   WIDTH KEPT AT 12?.       BIKES, PARKING, & LOADING:   15. DISTRIBUTE PUBLIC BIKE PARKING SPACES   ALONG/THROUGHOUT THE FRONTAGE.   [SATISFIED]   16. SHEET A-1 APPEARS TO SHOW OLD DROP-OFF WITH   PEDESTRIAN ISLAND AND TERRACE SEATING IN DROP-OFF ROW,   AS OPPOSED TO NEW DROP-OFF CONFIGURATION SHOWN IN   LANDSCAPE SHEETS.   [SATISFIED]   17. STAFF RECOMMENDS TO REDUCE DROP-OFF WIDTH TO 10?.   TALK WITH VALERIO (TRAFFIC ENGINEER)   [SATISFIED] TRAFFIC ENGINEER IS OKAY WITH PROPOSED DROP   OFF WIDTH.       FA?ADE ARTICULATION:   18. B-21 HAS UPDATED ELEVATION (NOT B-18 AS RESPONSE   INDICATES). WEST ELEVATION DRAWINGS INCLUDE A BLANK   WALL NOT PERMITTED BY CODE. GARAGE FACADE IS MORE THAN   20% OF OVERALL.   [SATISFIED]   19. WITHIN THE SUBMITTED DRAWINGS NOT SEEING THE   ALTERNATE SCREENING AND FACADE/ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENTS   DISCUSSED IN MEETINGS, DID PLANS REVERT TO PREVIOUS   DESIGN? PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW IS THE PROJECT COMPLYING   WITH THE PLANAR BREAK REQUIREMENTS.   [SATISFIED]   20. OKAY WITH ALLEYWAY/NO CHANGE IN SOUTHERN   GROUND-FLOOR FACADE. ALLEYWAY RENDERINGS SHOW A CANOPY   NOT ILLUSTRATED OR SHOWN IN DRAWINGS, PLEASE PROVIDE   MORE DETAILS IN DRAWINGS.   [SATISFIED]       GENERAL SITE:   21. DISCUSSIONS ONGOING, DETAILS AND ACTIONS TO BE   DETERMINED (FOR TRASH COMPACTOR)   [NOT SATISFIED] ONGOING   22. DISCUSSIONS ONGOING, DETAILS AND ACTIONS TO BE   DETERMINED (ALLEY ORIENTATION DETERMINED EASTBOUND).   SPEAK WITH VALERIO (TRAFFIC ENGINEER) EAST-WAY TRAFFIC   FLOW MAY BE NEEDED FOR VALET OPERATIONS. EXPLORE   OPENING IN GARAGE ON SOUTHWESTERN CORNER?   [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] ONGOING   23. FURTHER DISCUSSIONS NECESSARY TO CONFIRM THE   PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ON THE CITY-OWNED ALLEY ARE   VIABLE.   [NOT SATISFIED] ONGOING   24. PLEASE UPDATE TABLE TO INCLUDE SEPARATED   INFORMATION FOR 301 CLEMATIS AND 300 BANYAN, THEN   COMBINED TOTALS.   [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] PLEASE PUT IN SHEET A-1. PROJECT   DATA TABLE ALONG WITH PROPOSED GBA.   TABLE TO INCLUDE:   - SITE AREA   - ZONING   - FAR   - ALLOWABLE GBA BY RIGHT __ SF   - GBA WITH TDR __ SF   - TOTAL ALLOWABLE __ SF   - PROPOSED __ SF   PLEASE CREATE TABLE FOR BOTH 300 BANYAN AND 301   CLEMATIS.       25. GROUND FLOOR CORRIDORS AND ENCLOSED STORAGE AREAS,   ELEVATORS, AND STAIRS NEED TO BE INCLUDED. LABEL EACH   SPACE TO CONFIRM THAT IT IS A MECHANICAL ROOM NOT   INCLUDED WITHIN GBA. STAIR AT NW CORNER ONLY SERVING   GARAGE MAY BE EXCLUDED FROM GBA, BUT IT SHALL NOT BE   COUNTED AS ACTIVE USE ALONG BANYAN EITHER.   [SATISFIED] PER OUR DISCUSSION, THE BACK OF HOUSE   ?SERVICE CORRIDOR? AND ?PARKING LOBBY? WALLS SHALL BE   REMOVED AND OPEN TO THE GARAGE (NOT UNDER AC), SPACE   LABELED AS CAF? SUPPORT SHALL ALSO BE OPENED UP TO THE   GARAGE (MAY BE FENCED IN FOR STORAGE PURPOSES). PLEASE   LIST THE MECHANICAL SPACES TO BE LOCATED WITHIN THE   MEZZANINE.   26. EXPLAIN THE ELEVATORS NOT COUNTED AS FAR; PARKING   ELEVATORS? SERVICE ELEVATORS ONLY? WHAT IS WITHIN THE   SERVICE ROOMS?   [SATISFIED]       ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:   27. SOME DRAWINGS STILL SHOW THE PORTE-COCHERE? PLEASE   UPDATE AND VERIFY INFORMATION ACROSS DRAWINGS IS   CONSISTENT.   [SATISFIED]   28. RENDERINGS SHOW PLANTERS ALONG OLIVE NEXT TO PATIO   AREA BUT LANDSCAPE PLANS DO NOT SHOW ANY. GROUND FLOOR   PLANTERS DELINEATING PUBLIC WALKWAY AND RESTAURANT   TERRACE NEEDS FURTHER DISCUSSION.   [SATISFIED]   29. CONTEXTUAL RENDERINGS AND SCHEMATIC DRAWINGS ARE   NOT UPDATED OR CONSISTENT WITH ONE ANOTHER AND THE   CURRENT PROPOSAL.   [SATISFIED]   30. MICRO-MOBILITY STATION SHOULD BE IN PUBLIC   ROW/VISIBLE AS OPPOSED TO IN ALLEY.   [SATISFIED]   31. IF POWER LINES ALONG THE ALLEY ARE GOING TO BE   BURIED, PLEASE IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF THE REQUIRED   TRANSFORMERS.   [NOT SATISFIED] DISCUSSION ONGOING   32. PLEASE INCLUDE REFERENCE PHOTOS OF SPECIAL   MATERIALS USED IN ELEVATIONS TO BETTER EXPLAIN THE   FACADE TREATMENT.   [SATISFIED]       NEW COMMENTS 11/18/21:   33. RENDERINGS:   A. ACCURATELY REFLECT LANDSCAPE PLANS WITH TREES AND   VEGETATION   B. OLIVE AVE. ALONG 301 CLEMATIS DOES NOT HAVE SIDEWALK   WIDTH OR SPACE FOR TABLES AND POTTED PLANTS, NEEDS TO   BE SHOWN WITH ACCURATE SIDEWALK DIMENSION.   C. R-3 RENDERING NOT ACCURATE ? MISSING TREES ALONG   STREET. SHOWS LANDSCAPE ON COLUMN AND BACK OF OPEN   SPACE THAT IS NOT DEPICTED WITHIN THE LANDSCAPE   DRAWINGS.   D. R-4 SHOWS PLANTING NEXT TO BIKES ON BANYAN BUT NOT   IN THE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS   E. WEST ELEVATION RENDERING ?PUNCH-OUT? WINDOWS ON   FA?ADE SHALL REFLECT THE CORRECT DEPTH OF THE OPENINGS.     Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-20-2021 Cont ID   Sent By ckimmerl Date 10-20-2021 Time 08:30 Rev Time 0.00 Received By ckimmerl Date 09-24-2021 Time 18:37 Sent To   Notes 2021-10-20 08:30:06 SETBACKS   1. PROJECT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH TABLE IV-50 BUILDING   REQUIREMENTS? CWD 10-12. BUILDING IS ENCROACHING INTO   THE MINIMUM SETBACK (16?) ON LEVELS 3 AND ABOVE ALONG   OLIVE STREET, PLEASE ADJUST.   [NOT SATISFIED]   - BANYAN BOULEVARD 16? SETBACK NOT MET, APPEARS TO BE   14? IN DRAWINGS.   - PLEASE CLEARLY INDICATE SETBACK LINE IN ALL FLOOR   PLANS, ELEVATIONS, AND SECTIONS TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE.       OPEN SPACE   2. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON PRIVATE OPEN SPACE   (SEC. 94-109 TABLE IV-7), SPECIFYING THE AMOUNT,   LOCATION, AND TYPE OF SPACE. CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH   STANDARDS LOCATED IN TABLE FOR EACH TYPE OF SPACE.   [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]   - PLEASE UPDATE TABLE IN SHEET L4 ? TO REFLECT THAT THE   PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS CALCULATED FOR THE TWO SITES       3. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHAT THE OPEN SPACE/ACTIVE USE ALONG   THE GROUND LEVEL OF NORTHERN FACADE ON BANYAN IS.   [SATISFIED]       ACTIVE USE   4. PROPOSED PROJECT IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM   GROUND ACTIVE USES (65%) ALONG PRIMARY PEDESTRIAN   STREETS (OLIVE AND BANYAN). SEE TABLE IV-50 BUILDING   REQUIREMENTS? CWD 10-12   [NOT SATISFIED]   - MINOR TEXT ERROR, BOTH BANYAN AND OLIVE ARE PRIMARY   PEDESTRIAN STREETS IN THIS AREA (SHEET A-1 REFERS TO   OLIVE AS AN AVENUE).   - WILL REQUIRE VARIANCE FOR GROUND LEVEL ACTIVE USE   REQUIREMENT ALONG OLIVE; REQUIRED 80% OF FRONTAGE;   PROVIDED 62% (VARIANCE OF 18% OR 48.75? DIFFERENCE)   - WILL REQUIRE VARIANCE FOR GROUND LEVEL ACTIVE USE   REQUIREMENT ALONG BANYAN; REQUIRED 65% OF FRONTAGE;   PROVIDED 46% (VARIANCE OF 19% OR 30.92? DIFFERENCE)   - PLEASE INCLUDE GRAPHIC CALCULATIONS FOR THE ACTIVE   USE REQUIREMENTS INDICATING IN THE FLOOR PLAN WHAT IS   BEING COUNTED AND THE RESULTING PERCENTAGES. PLEASE   REVISE THE CALCULATED FRONTAGES AND PERCENTAGES OF   ACTIVE USE BASED ON THE BUILDABLE LOT FRONTAGE.       5. PROPOSED PROJECT IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM   LINER ACTIVE USES [2 TO 3 STORIES (44?)] WHICH REQUIRES   60%.   [NOT SATISFIED]   - WILL REQUIRE VARIANCE FOR 2ND AND 3RD STORY ACTIVE   USE LINER REQUIREMENT ALONG OLIVE AVE AND BANYAN BLVD;   REQUIRED 60%; PROVIDED 0% (VARIANCE OF 60%)   - THE 1ST STORY IS A DOUBLE HEIGHT AND IT WILL BE   COUNTED AS ONE LEVEL.   - THE ADDITIONAL ENHANCED TREATMENT OF NORTH FA?ADE   PREVIOUSLY DISCUSSED WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE SUBMITTED   DRAWINGS.       STREETSCAPE   6. STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS ARTICLE IV: SEC. 94-113,   PROPOSED PROJECT AND PLANS SHOULD REFLECT/COORDINATE   WITH THE CITY?S PROPOSED STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS ALONG   BANYAN BOULEVARD.   [NOT SATISFIED]   - ONGOING COORDINATION IS STILL NEEDED.       7. CITY WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS WIDENING THE SIDEWALK IN   FRONT OF HISTORIC BUILDING (301 CLEMATIS) TO ALLOW FOR   LANDSCAPING ALONG OLIVE.   [NOT SATISFIED]   - DISCUSSIONS ONGOING, DETAILS AND ACTIONS TO BE   DETERMINED.       8. STREET TREES SHALL BE PLANTED ALONG OLIVE FRONTAGE   ADJACENT TO THE CURB AT A MAXIMUM OF 30 FEET ON CENTER.   TREES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 20 FEET IN HEIGHT, AND HAVE   A MINIMUM OF EIGHT FEET CLEAR TRUNK, OR AS APPROVED BY   THE CITY. STRUCTURAL SOIL SHALL BE INSTALLED MEETING   THE CITY APPROVED STANDARDS AS A MINIMUM REQUIREMENT   UNDER ADJACENT PAVED AREAS, OR SUSPENDED PAVEMENT SOIL   CELL SYSTEMS MAY BE INSTALLED AS AN ALTERNATIVE.   [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]   - STAFF RECOMMENDS REDUCING THE DROP-OFF ON OLIVE AVE.   TO 10? IN WIDTH. FURTHER DISCUSSION NEEDED WITH TRAFFIC   ENGINEER.       BIKES, PARKING, & LOADING   9. AS PER ARTICLE IV: SEC. 94-111, BICYCLE PARKING MUST   INCLUDE:   A) (I) SECURE BIKE RACKS AND/OR STORAGE AT A RATIO OF   ONE BICYCLE PARKING SPACE PER EVERY 15 PARKING SPACES   PROVIDED   B) (II) A MINIMUM OF ONE SHOWER AND CHANGING FACILITY   SHALL BE PROVIDED TO BE AVAILABLE FOR ALL TENANTS AND   SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE BUILDING, OR WITHIN 200   FEET OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE, FOR DEVELOPMENTS GREATER   THAN 50,000 SQUARE FEET IN GROSS BUILDING AREA.   C) ADDITIONALLY, 1 SPACE PER 100 FT. OF STREET   FRONTAGE; TO BE LOCATED ALONG ROW OR STREET FRONTAGES   FOR PUBLIC ACCESS.   D) PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF SHOWER FACILITIES   [SATISFIED]   - DISTRIBUTE PUBLIC BIKE PARKING SPACES   ALONG/THROUGHOUT THE FRONTAGE.       10. AS PER SUBSECTION 94-485(P), PROPOSED PROJECT NOT   IN COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIRED LOADING STANDARDS   A) REQUIRES 2 (10?X50?) FOR COMMERCIAL USES; PROPOSED   PLAN WILL REQUIRE A VARIANCE.   [SATISFIED]       11. PLEASE PROVIDE AN AUTOTURN STUDY AND SERVICE PLAN.   [SATISFIED]       12. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT LOCATION OF PORTE COCHERE   DROP-OFF ALONG OLIVE.   A) MAY SUPPORT ALTERNATIVE ON-STREET DROP-OFF.   [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]   - SHEET A-1 APPEARS TO SHOW OLD DROP-OFF WITH   PEDESTRIAN ISLAND AND TERRACE SEATING IN DROP-OFF ROW,   AS OPPOSED TO NEW DROP-OFF CONFIGURATION SHOWN IN   LANDSCAPE SHEETS.   - STAFF RECOMMENDS TO REDUCE DROP-OFF WIDTH TO 10? ?   TALK WITH VALERIO (TRAFFIC ENGINEER)       13. PLEASE INCLUDE TABLE OF PARKING REQUIREMENTS.   [SATISFIED]       14. PLEASE DIMENSION ALL DRIVE AISLE AND PARKING   SPACES.   [SATISFIED]       FACADE ARTICULATION   15. WEST ELEVATION OF PROPOSED BUILDING HAS THE FIRST 7   FLOORS AS A BLANK WALL. DOES NOT COMPLY WITH CODE SEC.   94-109 TABLE IV-4. BLANK WALLS ARE NOT PERMITTED, AND   EXCEEDS 20% OF THE WESTERN FACADE. REQUIRES   FENESTRATION OR ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENTS.   [NOT SATISFIED]   - B-21 HAS UPDATED ELEVATION (NOT B-18 AS RESPONSE   INDICATES)   - WEST ELEVATION DRAWINGS INCLUDE A BLANK WALL NOT   PERMITTED BY CODE. GARAGE FA?ADE IS MORE THAN 20% OF   OVERALL.       16. ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT SHALL BE   PROVIDED TO SCREEN PARKING USES.   [NOT SATISFIED]   - WITHIN THE SUBMITTED DRAWINGS NOT SEEING THE   ALTERNATE SCREENING AND FA?ADE/ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENTS   DISCUSSED IN MEETINGS, DID PLANS REVERT TO PREVIOUS   DESIGN?   - PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW IS THE PROJECT COMPLYING WITH THE   PLANAR BREAK REQUIREMENTS.       17. SOME ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENTS ON PORTION   OF ALLEY (SOUTHERN FACADE) WOULD BE PREFERRED AS IT   DOESN?T HAVE FENESTRATION.   [SATISFIED]   - OKAY WITH ALLEYWAY/NO CHANGE IN SOUTHERN GROUND-FLOOR   FA?ADE.   - ALLEYWAY RENDERINGS SHOW A CANOPY NOT ILLUSTRATED OR   SHOWN IN DRAWINGS, PLEASE PROVIDE MORE DETAILS IN   DRAWINGS.       GENERAL SITE   18. CITY CURRENTLY HAS A TRASH COMPACTOR ON SITE.   FURTHER DISCUSSIONS NECESSARY TO EXPLORE OPTION TO KEEP   COMPACTOR ON SITE.   [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]   - DISCUSSIONS ONGOING, DETAILS AND ACTIONS TO BE   DETERMINED.   - SPEAK WITH VINCE (SURVEY)       19. FURTHER DISCUSSION NEEDED TO DETERMINE IF ALLEYWAY   NEEDS TO BE ONE-WAY.   [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]   - DISCUSSIONS ONGOING, DETAILS AND ACTIONS TO BE   DETERMINED.   - SPEAK WITH VALERIO (TRAFFIC ENGINEER) EAST-WAY   TRAFFIC FLOW MAY BE NEEDED FOR VALET OPERATIONS.   EXPLORE OPENING IN GARAGE ON SOUTHWESTERN CORNER?       20. PLEASE IDENTIFY IF THERE ARE ANY HARDSCAPE   IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED TO THE ALLEYWAY.   [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]   - FURTHER DISCUSSIONS NECESSARY TO CONFIRM THE PROPOSED   IMPROVEMENTS ON THE CITY-OWNED ALLEY ARE VIABLE.       21. PLEASE EXPLORE HOW THE DESIGN OF PROPOSED BUILDING   CAN BETTER RELATE TO THE HISTORIC BUILDING.   A) SCALE COMPATIBILITY WITH HISTORIC BUILDING, HISTORIC   TREATMENTS, ETC.   [SATISFIED]   - HPB APPROVED       22. PROVIDE SITE TABLE WITH:   A) SITE AREA   B) GROSS BUILDING AREA ALLOWED   C) GROSS BUILDING AREA PROPOSED   D) TDR?S NEEDED FOR PROJECT   [PARTIALLY SATISFIED]   - PLEASE UPDATE TABLE TO INCLUDE SEPARATED INFORMATION   FOR 301 CLEMATIS AND 300 BANYAN, THEN COMBINED TOTALS.       23. PLEASE LABEL WHAT THE USES ARE THAT ARE COUNTED AND   THOSE USES EXCLUDED FROM THE GROSS BUILDING AREA   CALCULATIONS.   [NOT SATISFIED]   - GROUND FLOOR CORRIDORS AND ENCLOSED STORAGE AREAS,   ELEVATORS, AND STAIRS NEED TO BE INCLUDED. LABEL EACH   SPACE TO CONFIRM THAT IT IS A MECHANICAL ROOM NOT   INCLUDED WITHIN GBA.   - STAIR AT NW CORNER ONLY SERVING GARAGE MAY BE   EXCLUDED FROM GBA, BUT IT SHALL NOT BE COUNTED AS   ACTIVE USE ALONG BANYAN EITHER.   - EXPLAIN THE ELEVATORS NOT COUNTED AS FAR; PARKING   ELEVATORS? SERVICE ELEVATORS ONLY? WHAT IS WITHIN THE   SERVICE ROOMS?       24. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT GROSS BUILDING AREA   CALCULATIONS ARE MEASURED FROM THE EXTERIOR WALL.   [SATISFIED]       25. PLEASE IDENTIFY LOCATION OF GAS METERS AND ANY   OTHER ABOVE GROUND UTILITY CONNECTIONS.   A) FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION ON BANYAN SHALL BE   WALL-MOUNTED.   [SATISFIED]       26. OPEN GROUND FLOOR AREAS EXCEED THE MAX PERMITTED   GROUND FLOOR SETBACK.   [SATISFIED]       ADDITIONAL COMMENTS BASED ON RESUBMISSION:   27. SOME DRAWINGS STILL SHOW THE PORTE-COCHERE ? PLEASE   UPDATE AND VERIFY INFORMATION ACROSS DRAWINGS IS   CONSISTENT.   28. RENDERINGS SHOW PLANTERS ALONG OLIVE NEXT TO PATIO   AREA BUT LANDSCAPE PLANS DO NOT SHOW ANY. GROUND FLOOR   PLANTERS DELINEATING PUBLIC WALKWAY AND RESTAURANT   TERRACE NEEDS FURTHER DISCUSSION.   29. CONTEXTUAL RENDERINGS AND SCHEMATIC DRAWINGS ARE   NOT UPDATED OR CONSISTENT WITH ONE ANOTHER AND THE   CURRENT PROPOSAL.   30. MICRO-MOBILITY STATION SHOULD BE IN PUBLIC   ROW/VISIBLE AS OPPOSED TO IN ALLEY.   31. IF POWER LINES ALONG THE ALLEY ARE GOING TO BE   BURIED, PLEASE IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF THE REQUIRED   TRANSFORMERS.   32. PLEASE INCLUDE REFERENCE PHOTOS OF SPECIAL   MATERIALS USED IN ELEVATIONS TO BETTER EXPLAIN THE   FA?ADE TREATMENT.   FOR RESUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE A RESPONSE LETTER, ONE   FULL SET COPY (COLORED) AND A CD WITH A DIGITAL COPY.   COMMENTS DO NOT INCLUDE A REVIEW OF RENDERINGS E-MAILED   TO STAFF ON 10/15/21.     Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-12-2021 Cont ID   Sent By ckimmerl Date 08-12-2021 Time 10:47 Rev Time 0.00 Received By ckimmerl Date 08-12-2021 Time 10:45 Sent To   Notes 2021-08-12 10:47:28 SETBACKS   1. PROJECT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH TABLE IV-50 BUILDING   REQUIREMENTS ? CWD 10-12. BUILDING IS ENCROACHING INTO   THE MINIMUM SETBACK (16?) ON LEVELS 3 AND ABOVE ALONG   OLIVE STREET, PLEASE ADJUST.       OPEN SPACE   2. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON PRIVATE OPEN SPACE   (SEC. 94-109 TABLE IV-7), SPECIFYING THE AMOUNT,   LOCATION, AND TYPE OF SPACE. CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH   STANDARDS LOCATED IN TABLE FOR EACH TYPE OF SPACE.   3. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHAT THE OPEN SPACE/ACTIVE USE ALONG   THE GROUND LEVEL OF NORTHERN FA?ADE ON BANYAN IS.       ACTIVE USE   4. PROPOSED PROJECT IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM   GROUND ACTIVE USES (65%) ALONG PRIMARY PEDESTRIAN   STREETS (OLIVE AND BANYAN). SEE TABLE IV-50 BUILDING   REQUIREMENTS ? CWD 10-12   5. PROPOSED PROJECT IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM   LINER ACTIVE USES [2 TO 3 STORIES (44?)] WHICH REQUIRES   60%.       STREETSCAPE   6. STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS ARTICLE IV: SEC. 94-113,   PROPOSED PROJECT AND PLANS SHOULD REFLECT/COORDINATE   WITH THE CITY?S PROPOSED STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS ALONG   BAYAN BOULEVARD.   7. CITY WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS WIDENING THE SIDEWALK IN   FRONT OF HISTORIC BUILDING (301 CLEMATIS) TO ALLOW FOR   LANDSCAPING ALONG OLIVE.   8. STREET TREES SHALL BE PLANTED ALONG OLIVE FRONTAGE   ADJACENT TO THE CURB AT A MAXIMUM OF 30 FEET ON CENTER.   TEES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 20 FEET IN HEIGHT, AND HAVE   A MINIMUM OF EIGHT FEET CLEAR TRUNK, OR AS APPROVED BY   THE CITY. STRUCTURAL SOIL SHALL BE INSTALLED MEETING   THE CITY APPROVED STANDARDS AS A MINIMUM REQUIREMENT   UNDER ADJACENT PAVED AREAS, OR SUSPENDED PAVEMENT SOIL   CELL SYSTEMS MAY BE INSTALLED AS AN ALTERNATIVE.       BIKES, PARKING, & LOADING   9. AS PER ARTICLE IV: SEC. 94-111, BICYCLE PARKING MUST   INCLUDE:   A) (I) SECURE BIKE RACKS AND/OR STORAGE AT A RATIO OF   ONE BICYCLE PARKING SPACE PER EVERY 15 PARKING SPACES   PROVIDED   B) (II) A MINIMUM OF ONE SHOWER AND CHANGING FACILITY   SHALL BE PROVIDED TO BE AVAILABLE FOR ALL TENANTS AND   SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE BUILDING, OR WITHIN 200   FEET OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE, FOR DEVELOPMENTS GREATER   THAN 50,000 SQUARE FEET IN GROSS BUILDING AREA.   C) ADDITIONALLY, 1 SPACE PER 100 FT. OF STREET   FRONTAGE; TO BE LOCATED ALONG ROW OR STREET FRONTAGES   FOR PUBLIC ACCESS.   D) PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF SHOWER FACILITIES   10. AS PER SUBSECTION 94-485(P), PROPOSED PROJECT NOT   IN COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIRED LOADING STANDARDS   A) REQUIRES 2 (10?X50?) FOR COMMERCIAL USES; PROPOSED   PLAN WILL REQUIRE A VARIANCE   11. PLEASE PROVIDE AN AUTOTURN STUDY AND SERVICE PLAN   12. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT LOCATION OF PORTE COCHERE   DROP-OFF ALONG OLIVE.   A) MAY SUPPORT ALTERNATIVE ON-STREET DROP-OFF.   13. PLEASE INCLUDE TABLE OF PARKING REQUIREMENTS.   14. PLEASE DIMENSION ALL DRIVE AISLE AND PARKING   SPACES.       FACADE ARTICULATION   15. WEST ELEVATION OF PROPOSED BUILDING HAS THE FIRST 7   FLOORS AS A BLANK WALL. DOES NOT COMPLY WITH CODE SEC.   94-109 TABLE IV-4. BLANK WALLS ARE NOT PERMITTED, AND   EXCEEDS 20% OF THE WESTERN FA?ADE. REQUIRES   FENESTRATION OR ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENTS.   16. ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT SHALL BE   PROVIDED TO SCREEN PARKING USES.   17. SOME ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENTS ON PORTION   OF ALLEY (SOUTHERN FA?ADE) WOULD BE PREFERRED AS IT   DOESN?T HAVE FENESTRATION.       GENERAL SITE   18. CITY CURRENTLY HAS A TRASH COMPACTOR ON SITE.   FURTHER DISCUSSIONS NECESSARY TO EXPLORE OPTION TO KEEP   COMPACTOR ON SITE.   19. FURTHER DISCUSSION NEEDED TO DETERMINE IF ALLEYWAY   NEEDS TO BE ONE-WAY.   20. PLEASE IDENTIFY IF THERE ARE ANY HARDSCAPE   IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED TO THE ALLEYWAY.   21. PLEASE EXPLORE HOW THE DESIGN OF PROPOSED BUILDING   CAN BETTER RELATE TO THE HISTORIC BUILDING.   A) SCALE COMPATIBILITY WITH HISTORIC BUILDING, HISTORIC   TREATMENTS, ETC.   22. PROVIDE SITE TABLE WITH:   A) SITE AREA   B) GROSS BUILDING AREA ALLOWED   C) GROSS BUILDING AREA PROPOSED   D) TDRS NEEDED FOR PROJECT   23. PLEASE LABEL WHAT THE USES ARE THAT ARE COUNTED AND   THOSE USES EXCLUDED FROM THE GROSS BUILDING AREA   CALCULATIONS.   24. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT GROSS BUILDING AREA   CALCULATIONS ARE MEASURED FROM THE EXTERIOR WALL.   25. PLEASE IDENTIFY LOCATION OF GAS METERS AND ANY   OTHER ABOVE GROUND UTILITY CONNECTIONS.   A) FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION ON BANYAN SHALL BE   WALL-MOUNTED.   26. OPEN GROUND FLOOR AREAS EXCEED THE MAX PERMITTED   GROUND FLOOR SETBACK.       Print Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved