 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z21070016
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z21070016 |
| Review Stop |
AIPP |
ART IN PUBLIC PLACES |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-20-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
scwelter |
Date |
09-20-2021 |
Time |
15:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
scwelter |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-09-20 15:49:09 | PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT: | | | IF TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT ARE | | | OVER $500,000 IT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC ART | | | REQUIREMENT AS PER CITY ORDINANCE. | | | SECTION 78-129: ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, | | | INCLUDING NEW CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR | | | IMPROVEMENT OF AN EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE TOTAL | | | CONSTRUCTION COSTS ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN | | | $500,000 ARE SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT. | | | OPTION 1: INSTALL ARTWORK ON THE DEVELOPMENT SITE | | | VALUED IN AN AMOUNT NOT LESS THAN ONE PERCENT OF THE | | | TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS; OR | | | OPTION 2: CONTRIBUTE AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO 75 PERCENT OF | | | ONE PERCENT OF THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR DEPOSIT | | | TO THE PUBLIC ART ACCOUNT. | | | A COMPLETED PUBLIC ART ASSESSMENT APPLICATION IS | | | REQUIRED AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | | | | PLEASE CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER AT [email protected] OR | | | 561.822.1521 TO OBTAIN AN APPLICATION AND REVIEW THE | | | REQUIREMENTS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-11-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
08-11-2021 |
Time |
21:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
08-11-2021 |
Time |
21:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-08-11 21:13:09 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AN ASBESTOS | | | SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT | | | REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963, | | | OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 3. UNITY OF TITLE. FOR ANY BUILDING CROSSING A PROPERTY | | | LINE, EITHER A RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE, OR SOME OTHER | | | APPROVED LEGAL INSTRUMENT, SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE | | | PERMIT APPLICATION, OR THE BUILDING MUST HAVE A FIRE | | | WALL ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, PER SECTION 202 OF | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, FIRE SEPARATION | | | DISTANCE. | | | | | | 4. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PER SECTION 208.2.4 | | | OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX | | | REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING | | | STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND DESIGNED IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY | | | CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT | | | SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE) | | | | | | 5. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR | | | THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, | | | AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 6. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES | | | NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO | | | MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL | | | BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE | | | EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED | | | TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR | | | OTHER APPROVED METHODS. | | | | | | 7. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE | | | REQUIRED. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE | | | AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT TIM LARGE, CHIEF PLUMBING | | | INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561) | | | 805-6692, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 8. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, | | | GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND | | | OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS, | | | SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 9. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND | | | CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF | | | CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. | | | | | | 10. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER | | | AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY, | | | INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE | | | CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION | | | THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY. | | | | | | 11. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT | | | WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL | | | HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION | | | OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, | | | CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT | | | (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 12. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT | | | TO ART LIFE ASSESSMENT UNDER THE CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) PROGRAM. FOR ADVICE | | | ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP | | | ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC | | | PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-11-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
01-11-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
01-11-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-01-11 07:40:50 | CCTV RECEIVED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-02-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
12-02-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
12-02-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-12-02 10:54:03 | COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENG. | | | SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098 [email protected] : | | | | | | 1. PLEASE CLARIFY RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR CCTV OF | | | SANITARY AND STORM. COMPLETION OF WHAT? PROVISION OF | | | CCTV IS A CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL AS PREVIOUSLY | | | STATED. | | | 2. PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING AND | | | INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER | | | (Z-XXXXXXXX). PLEASE PROVIDE YOUR CONTACT INFORMATION | | | WITH RESPONSE. | | | | | | COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE | | | SUPER., WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-494-2262 OR | | | [email protected]: | | | FOLLOWUP COMMENTS: | | | | | | COMMENT 2: 12. WILL ALL OF THE METERED PARKING SPOTS ON | | | DATURA REMAIN AFTER PROJECT COMPLETED? RESPONSE: A | | | PORTION OF THE METERED PARKING WILL BE REMOVED DUE TO | | | REDESIGN OF DATURA STREET LAYOUT. EMAIL SEAN SAMUELS | | | [email protected] AND COPY DANIEL GIUST [email protected] | | | AND ANA MARIA APONTE [email protected] REGARDING THIS | | | ISSUE. | | | RESPONSE 2: TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER TO ANSWER. | | | FOLLOWUP: NOT SATISIFIED. SEAN SAMUELS ADVISED STILL | | | NEED TO CONTACT HIM AS THERE ARE DETAILS TO WORK OUT. | | | EMAIL SEAN SAMUELS [email protected] AND COPY DANIEL | | | GIUST [email protected] AND ANA MARIA APONTE | | | [email protected] REGARDING THIS ISSUE. | | | | | | | | | NEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | -4 BY 6 METER VAULT CANNOT BE USED. LARGE DOMESTIC | | | METERS SIZED 3 INCH OR GREATER MUST BE INSTALLED ABOVE | | | GROUND. REVISE LABEL WORDING OF WATER METER TO INDICATE | | | SIZING AND ABOVE GROUND INSTALLATION. INCLUDE THAT | | | WATER SERVICE STANDARD DETAIL ON A SEPARATE SHEET. | | | | | | -ON SEPARATE SHEET WITH CIVIL PLANS INCLUDE ADDITIONAL | | | STANDARD DETAILS INCLUDING SMALL BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY, | | | LARGE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY, SMALL METERED WATER SERVICE, | | | FIRELINE DCDA, AND PAVEMENT RESTORATION. | | | | | | -FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY SHOULD NOT BE IN UTILITY | | | EASEMENT. LIKELY WOULD NEED TO ADJUST BOUNDARY OF | | | UTILITY EASEMENT. | | | | | | -IRRIGATION BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY MAY NOT BE LOCATED IN THE | | | RIGHT OF WAY. MUST BE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. WOULD NEED | | | TO BE IMMEDIATELY AFTER SIDEWALK SOUTH OF THE METER | | | BOX. | | | | | | -WILL THERE BE SIGNAGE TO PREVENT DRIVERS FROM ENTERING | | | EXIT ONLY DRIVEWAY? | | | | | | -PLEASE LABEL ALL OF THE WATER SERVICES AND SEWER | | | LATERALS EXISTING OR PROPOSED. | | | | | | -CIVIL PLANS DO NOT SHOW SEVERAL EXISTING WATER | | | SERVICES ALONG DATURA ST THAT WOULD REQUIRE REMOVAL. | | | SHOW THOSE CLEARLY AT FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | -APPLICANT MUST PAY ANY UTILITY FEES, CHARGES, OR | | | DEPOSITS REQUIRED BY CITY OF WPB UTILITIES. | | | | | | -AT FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL: ADD FIRE FLOW | | | CALCULATIONS TO WATER PLAN, ADD PROFILES OF WATER | | | SERVICES, ADD CROSSING INFORMATION, LABEL ALL WATER AND | | | SEWER UTILITIES WITH PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL TYPE, ADD | | | SLOPE GUIDANCE TO SEWER LATERALS, ADD ELEVATION INFO TO | | | SEWER MANHOLES. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-29-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
09-29-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
09-29-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-09-29 17:28:10 | COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENG. | | | SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098 [email protected] : | | | | | | 1. CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY | | | SEWER ARE REQUIRED. | | | 2. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND | | | PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM | | | AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE | | | PER FAC 64E-8 FOR WATER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR SEWER. | | | 3. PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND | | | STORMWATER PIPES ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE. CCTV IS | | | A CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL. | | | 4. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND | | | IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED AREAS | | | ON PAVING PLANS. | | | 5. COORDINATE WITH MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE | | | SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING | | | PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT | | | HIM AT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected] | | | 6. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL , PLANS SHALL SHOW | | | PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, | | | STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES, INCLUDING | | | STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY | | | SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, METERS, AND | | | OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH | | | BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES | | | SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, | | | CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND | | | MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER LINES. ALL | | | AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PROFILE VIEW. | | | DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN | | | VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. ADDITIONALLY, | | | PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED | | | UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, | | | ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION | | | FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | 7. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL , CUT AND CAP | | | UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY ABANDONED UTILITY | | | LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY RIGHT OF WAY. | | | 8. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL , PROVIDE DEDICATED | | | UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO | | | PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. | | | 9. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION OF WATER | | | METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION. | | | 10. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE CALLOUT | | | DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA AND FIRE BACKFLOW | | | PREVENTER AS DCDA. SPECIFY LEAD FREE DESIGN ON ALL | | | BACKFLOWS. | | | 11. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND | | | NPDES NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED. | | | - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT: | | | - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS | | | THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF | | | DEVELOPMENT OR SALE; AND | | | - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE | | | STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A | | | MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4). | | | - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF | | | CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION | | | THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL | | | SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT | | | OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION. IF THE ENGINEERING PLANS DO | | | NOT INCLUDE AN EROSION CONTROL PLAN, THEN THE | | | CONTRACTOR SHOULD SUBMIT ONE PRIOR TO RECEIVING THE | | | ENGINEERING PERMIT. | | | 12. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES | | | OF PROPOSED AND EXISTING WATER AND SEWER WITHIN RIGHT | | | OF WAY AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS. | | | 13. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING | | | APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT | | | SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING | | | SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED | | | LEAD-FREE DESIGN. | | | 14. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL CLEARLY SHOW ROAD | | | RIGHT OF WAY. | | | 15. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL PROVIDE SANITARY | | | ELEVATIONS AT MANHOLE TIE-IN. | | | 16. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES | | | ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY | | | LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT | | | PARCELS. | | | 17. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES | | | ARE BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL | | | ADDRESSES. | | | 18. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN TRENCHING IN | | | IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE 50 | | | FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF | | | PROPOSED TRENCH PER CURRENT CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL | | | GC-8. | | | 19. PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING AND | | | INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER | | | (Z-XXXXXXXX). | | | | | | COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE | | | SUPER., WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-494-2262 OR | | | [email protected]: | | | | | | 1. VERIFY WITH WPB FIRE MARSHAL THAT PROPOSED DCDA | | | LOCATION IS ACCEPTABLE. | | | RESPONSE: WE HAVE COORDINATED WITH MARK HURLEY TO | | | DETERMINE THE PROPER LOCATION FOR DCDA. | | | NOT SATISFIED. CANNOT RECALL COORDINATING WITH | | | APPLICANT ON DCDA LOCATION AND NO VERIFICATION FROM WPB | | | FIRE MARSHAL. PLEASE ALSO REFERENCE REVIEW COMMENTS AND | | | RESPONSES FROM FIRE MARSHAL 7C AND ANA MARIA 19. | | | | | | 12. WILL ALL OF THE METERED PARKING SPOTS ON DATURA | | | REMAIN AFTER PROJECT COMPLETED? | | | RESPONSE: A PORTION OF THE METERED PARKING WILL BE | | | REMOVED DUE TO REDESIGN OF DATURA STREET LAYOUT. | | | EMAIL SEAN SAMUELS [email protected] AND COPY DANIEL | | | GIUST [email protected] AND ANA MARIA APONTE | | | [email protected] REGARDING THIS ISSUE. | | | | | | 20. LANDSCAPING PLAN ONLY SHOWS TREES BEING REMOVED. | | | PLEASE UPDATE LANDSCAPING PLAN TO SHOW ANY OTHER | | | PROPOSED OR EXISTING LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES, BUSHES, | | | PLANTS, AND GRASS. VERIFY TREES WILL NOT CONFLICT WITH | | | UTILITIES. ALSO ADD SEPARATE SHEET SHOWING UTILITIES | | | OVERLAID WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | RESPONSE: NOT A CIVIL COMMENT, HAVE LANDSCAPE RESPOND. | | | NOT SATISIFIED. DID NOT SEE LANDSCAPING PLAN WITH | | | PROPOSED LANDSCAPING IN RESUBMITTAL PACKAGE. | | | | | | NEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | -CIVIL, SITE, AND LANDSCAPING PLANS DO NOT APPEAR TO | | | MATCH EACH OTHER WITH RESPECT TO THE WATER SERVICES AND | | | BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES. SITE PLANS ONLY SHOW BACKFLOW | | | ASSEMBLIES, BUT SHOW THEM IN THE NORTHWEST AREA OF | | | PROPERTY CONTRARY TO THE OTHER PLAN SETS. PLEASE MAKE | | | SURE ALL PLANS MATCH, AND ALSO SHOW THE LARGE ABOVE | | | GROUND METER ON THE SITE PLANS. | | | | | | -UTILITY EASEMENT IS NOT NEEDED IN THE RIGHT OF WAY. | | | | | | -RELOCATE IRRIGATION METER ADJACENT THE PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | -ADD UTILITY EASEMENT FOR IRRIGATION METER AND UPSTREAM | | | PIPING IF SOUTH OF PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | -BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES MAY NOT BE IN UTILITY EASEMENTS. | | | MAY NEED TO MAKE SEPARATE SYMBOL OR ICON FOR THE | | | BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES TO DISTINGUISH THAT. | | | | | | -LABEL IRRIGATION BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AS RP TYPE. | | | | | | -SEWER LATERAL CONNECTION AT SEWER MAIN IS CLOSE TO | | | FIBER OPTIC BOX AND MAY NEED TO BE RELOCATED UPON | | | FURTHER REVIEW AT ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | -UTILITY PLAN SHOWS EXISTING POLE CONFLICT WITH | | | PROPOSED ALLEY BAY DRIVE ENTRANCE. | | | | | | | | | COMMENTS FROM MICHAEL TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, WPB | | | PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-494-1047, [email protected] : | | | -ADD LOS TO PLAN SHEET. | | | -PROVIDE NAVD CONVERSION. | | | -PLEASE ADD NOTE THAT THIS IS WITHIN LS 21 SERVICE | | | AREA. | | | -PLEASE SHOW ALL VALVES, SHOW PIPE TYPE AND SIZE. | | | -SHOW DIRECTION OF FLOW. | | | -CALL OUT SIZE OF METER. | | | -WHAT IS UGU? PLEASE SHOW ON LEGEND. | | | -PROVIDE POST CCTV OF SERVICE LATERALS. | | | -NOTE TO CUT AND CAP UNUSED SERVICES AT THE MAIN. | | | -CALL OUT SIZE/MATERIAL OF GAS MAIN. | | | -CALL OUT SIZE/MATERIAL OF SERVICE. | | | -WHAT SIZE IS THE CONNECTION TO GREASE TRAP? | | | -CITY WOULD LIKE THE CLEANOUT IN THE ROW. | | | -SHOW ALL EXISTING DRY UTILITIES. | | | -METER SHOULD BE WITHIN ROW. | | | -PLANS APPEAR TO BE CONCEPTUAL. A MORE THOROUGH REVIEW | | | WILL BE DONE WITH FINALIZED PLANS. | | | | | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | CONCERNS, THANKS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-05-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
08-05-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
08-05-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-08-05 13:06:23 | COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098 | | | [email protected] : | | | | | | 1. THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF | | | REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY | | | AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND | | | WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. TO VIEW | | | DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER | | | ENGINEERING RELATED DOCUMENTS, CLICK HERE OR GO TO: HTT | | | PS://WWW.WPB.ORG/GOVERNMENT/ENGINEERING/ENGINEERING-FOR | | | MS-PERMITS-AND-APPLICATIONS . | | | 2. CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, | | | FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08, ADOPTED | | | SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18) CHAPTER 90 | | | UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. SEC. 90-7. | | | POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER SERVICE | | | FACILITIES OF THE CITY: | | | THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE | | | CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY | | | BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS, | | | BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION. | | | 3. AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR | | | MORE INFORMATION, CLICK HERE OR GO TO: HTTPS://WWW.WPB. | | | ORG/GOVERNMENT/ENGINEERING/ENGINEERING-FORMS-PERMITS-AN | | | D-APPLICATIONS . | | | 4. PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY | | | OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC | | | RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF | | | YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE | | | MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL | | | IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT | | | [email protected] OR 561-494-1040 FOR FURTHER | | | ASSISTANCE. | | | 5. PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS | | | OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES, | | | INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND | | | SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, | | | METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE | | | SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING | | | GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, | | | ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL | | | INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER | | | LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE | | | PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN | | | VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. | | | PLEASE SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT | | | MATERIAL. ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL | | | EXISTING AND PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, | | | INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & | | | TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL | | | UTILITY CROSSINGS. | | | 6. CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY | | | ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY | | | ROW. | | | 7. PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE | | | DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB | | | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION). | | | 8. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND | | | PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM | | | AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE | | | PER FAC 64E-8 FOR WATER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR SEWER. | | | 9. SHOW VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION INFORMATION | | | (NAVD 88 AND NGVD 29). | | | 10. PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND | | | STORMWATER ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE. | | | 11. PLEASE ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY?S | | | DOWNSTREAM LIFT STATION NUMBER. | | | 12. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND | | | IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED | | | AREAS. | | | 13. PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR | | | PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS. | | | 14. PLEASE LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE | | | APPLICABLE. | | | 15. PLEASE PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED | | | LOCATION OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION. | | | 16. COORDINATE WITH MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE | | | SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING | | | PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT | | | HIM AT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected] | | | 17. PROVIDE DEDICATED UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS | | | FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD | | | CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, | | | PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]: | | | | | | -VERIFY WITH WPB FIRE MARSHAL THAT PROPOSED DCDA | | | LOCATION IS ACCEPTABLE. | | | | | | -SEPARATE THE FIRELINE FROM THE DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE | | | WITH ITS OWN PIPING FROM THE WATER MAIN. | | | | | | -DOMESTIC WATER METER FOOTPRINT ON UTILITY PLAN LOOKS | | | SUBSTANTIALLY SMALLER THAN A TYPICAL LARGE METERED | | | WATER SERVICE. | | | | | | -METERS THREE INCHES OR LARGER NEED TO BE INSTALLED | | | ABOVE-GROUND AND OUTSIDE OF BUILDING. | | | | | | -DOMESTIC BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES NEED TO BE INSTALLED | | | OUTSIDE OF BUILDING. SHOW AND LABEL THEM ON THE UTILITY | | | PLAN. | | | | | | -CONSIDER DUAL/PARALLEL DOMESTIC BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES TO | | | MINIMIZE WATER OUTAGES DURING BACKFLOW MAINTENANCE. | | | | | | -WILL A SEPARATE METERED IRRIGATION WATER SERVICE BE | | | NEEDED? | | | | | | -THERE IS A CLEANOUT IN ALLEY WHERE DOORS OPEN WHICH | | | MAY CONFLICT WITH USE OF EACH AT THE SAME TIME. | | | | | | -ADD WATER DEMAND CALCULATIONS TO UTILITY PLAN. | | | | | | -IF THERE WILL BE DEMOLITION, DEMOLITION PLAN NEEDS TO | | | BE SUBMITTED. | | | | | | -ALLEY IS ONE-WAY FROM WEST TO EAST. IT IS ALSO NARROW | | | AT BOTH ENDS AND THERE MAY BE SOME POLES AND BOLLARDS | | | THROUGHOUT. CAN PROPOSED LOADING DOCK BE UTILIZED BY | | | THE NEEDED VEHICLES BASED ON THAT INFORMATION? | | | | | | -WILL ALL OF THE METERED PARKING SPOTS ON DATURA REMAIN | | | AFTER PROJECT COMPLETED? | | | | | | -HISTORIC PICTURES AND SURVEY SHOW TALL UTILITY POLE IN | | | ALLEY ADJACENT SOUTH PROPERTY LINE. PLEASE SHOW AND | | | LABEL ON UTILITY PLAN. | | | | | | -FIBER OPTIC BOX IN ALLEY NOT SHOWING ON UTILITY PLAN. | | | PLEASE ADD AND LABEL. DO SAME WITH ELECTRIC VAULT. | | | | | | -WATER MAINS AND/OR SEWER MAINS MAY NEED TO BE REPLACED | | | BY APPLICANT TO FACILITATE PROPOSED SEWER LATERALS AND | | | WATER SERVICES. | | | | | | -ON UTILITY PLAN PLEASE SHOW THE BOLLARDS, DCDA, AND | | | STREET SIGNS IN ALLEY. | | | | | | -LABEL THE FIRE HYDRANT NEAR SOUTHEAST AREA OF PROPERTY | | | TO THE UTILITY PLAN. | | | | | | -SOME OF THE BUILDING STRUCTURES APPEAR TO BE THE IN | | | THE SETBACKS. IS THAT ALLOWED? | | | | | | -ON THE SITE PLAN AND UTILITY PLAN, PLEASE LABEL THE | | | TWO OBJECTS JUST NORTH OF THE PUMP ROOM. | | | | | | -LANDSCAPING PLAN ONLY SHOWS TREES BEING REMOVED. | | | PLEASE UPDATE LANDSCAPING PLAN TO SHOW ANY OTHER | | | PROPOSED OR EXISTING LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES, BUSHES, | | | PLANTS, AND GRASS. VERIFY TREES WILL NOT CONFLICT WITH | | | UTILITIES. ALSO ADD SEPARATE SHEET SHOWING UTILITIES | | | OVERLAID WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | COMMENTS PER MIKE TECHNOW 561-494-1047 OR | | | [email protected] WITH ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO THE STANDARDS: | | | -CALL OUT PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL. | | | -SHOW EXISTING VALVES. | | | -CALL OUT EASEMENTS POINT OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS. | | | -PROVIDE PROFILE OF EXISTING UTILITIES (WATER, SEWER | | | AND STORM) WITHIN CITY R/W. | | | -PROVIDE PROFILE FOR POINT OF SERVICE CONNECTION. | | | -PROVIDE NOTE THAT THIS IS WITHIN LIFT STATION #21 | | | SERVICE BOUNDARY. | | | -PROVIDE CALCULATION FOR SELECTED METER SIZE. | | | -INCLUDE UTILITY CONFLICT/CROSSING INFO INCLUDING SOFT | | | DIG/TEST HOLE REPORTS. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-15-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
09-15-2021 |
Time |
10:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
09-15-2021 |
Time |
10:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-09-15 10:19:51 | FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES. | | | | | | FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES NOT | | | CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT THE | | | APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-06-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
08-06-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
08-06-2021 |
Time |
10:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-08-06 10:59:57 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT; HOWEVER, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE | | | PROVIDED AND MAY NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATIONS WHERE | | | APPLICABLE. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | 6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A, | | | PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE, | | | INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE | | | OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES) | | | | | | 7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA | | | 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS | | | STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE | | | BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE | | | BEING CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED | | | TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE | | | PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION. | | | | | | IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT HIGH RISES HAVE TWO SEPARATE FDC | | | LOCATIONS REMOTELY LOCATED. | | | | | | COODINATE THE LOCATIONS OF THE FDC'S WITH THE OFFICE OF | | | THE FIRE MARSHAL. WALL MOUNTS CAN BE APPROVED TO HELP | | | AVOID FDC'S WITHIN THE SIDEWALK OR LANDSCAPED AREAS. | | | | | | 7A. PER NFPA 14 | | | | | | 6.4.5.4* FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED | | | NOT MORE THAN 100 FT (30.5 M) FROM THE NEAREST FIRE | | | HYDRANT CONNECTED TO AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY. | | | | | | 7B. PER NFPA 1 | | | | | | 18.3 WATER SUPPLIES. | | | | | | 18.3.1* AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING | | | THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED TO ALL PREMISES UPON WHICH FACILITIES, | | | BUILDINGS, OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS ARE HEREAFTER | | | CONSTRUCTED OR MOVED INTO THE JURISDICTION. THE | | | APPROVED WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | SECTION 18.4. | | | | | | PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004, | | | FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE | | | POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF | | | APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT, | | | CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR | | | AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER | | | SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA) | | | AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS | | | PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS. | | | | | | FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE | | | PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES? | | | | | | 7C. THE LOCATION OF THE DDCV FIRE LINE LOCATION SHALL | | | MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE | | | COORDINATED WITH THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S | | | ENGINEERS OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S | | | PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE. | | | | | | 8. A CLASS ?A? NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM | | | SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP | | | DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY | | | INSTALLATION. | | | | | | 9. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7 | | | KEYWAY SYSTEM. | | | | | | ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S | | | EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA | | | B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS. | | | | | | ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN | | | WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL | | | LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET | | | MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER | | | ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN | | | AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE | | | IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION. | | | | | | 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 10A. PLEASE REVIEW THE TERRACE DECKS LIFE SAFETY | | | EXITING PER THE OCCUPANCY LOAD TOTALS ON FLOORS 7 & 19. | | | | | | THE TERRACE SPACES ARE QUITE LARGE AND WITH THE LIMITED | | | INFORMATION IT NOT CLEAR IF THE COMBINED WIDTH OF THE | | | EXITS WILL BE ABLE TO ACCOMDATE THE OCCUPANCY LOADS. | | | | | | THERE ARE 2 EXITS INDICATED; HOWEVER, BASED ON THE | | | OCCUPANCY LOAD CALCULATIONS A 3RD OR 4TH EXIT EXIT MAY | | | BE REQUIRED. | | | | | | 11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED | | | ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE | | | BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND | | | FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET | | | OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER | | | ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES. | | | | | | 12. COMMAND ROOM | | | | | | THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1, | | | CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN | | | THE FOLLOWING FEATURES: | | | | | | 11.9.1 THE LOCATION, DESIGN, CONTENT, AND FIRE | | | DEPARTMENT ACCESS OF THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL | | | BE APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. | | | | | | 11.9.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE SEPARATED | | | FROM THE REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING BY A FIRE BARRIER | | | HAVING A FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 1 | | | HOUR. | | | | | | 11.9.3 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER ROOM SHALL BE A | | | MINIMUM OF 96 FT2 (8.9 M2) WITH A MINIMUM DIMENSION OF | | | 8 FT (2.4 M). | | | | | | A. PER FL BLDG CODE;(MORE STRICT) IT SHALL BE A MINIMUM | | | OF 200 FT SQUARED WITH A MINIMUM DIMENSION OF 10 FT. | | | B. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM. | | | C. A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED | | | ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM | | | D. SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL | | | FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF | | | EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING | | | EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS AND THE LOCATION | | | OF FIRE WALLS, FIRE BARRIERS, FIRE PARTITIONS, SMOKE | | | BARRIERS AND SMOKE PARTITIONS | | | E. A WORK TABLE. | | | F. IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN | | | FOR THE BUILDING. | | | G. THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | | | CONTROL UNIT. | | | H. ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION OF | | | THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL | | | I. STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR DISTRIBUTION | | | SYSTEMS. | | | J. CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS SIMULTANEOUSLY | | | K. SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY | | | PANELS | | | L. EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS | | | M. FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS | | | N. GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND | | | TRANSFER FEATURES. | | | O. PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED | | | BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE | | | P. CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL | | | Q. ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME | | | A17.1. | | | R. ELEVATOR EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER SELECTOR | | | SWITCH(ES), WHERE EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER IS | | | PROVIDED | | | 11.8.6* EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER. | | | 11.8.6.1 AN EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE PROVIDED | | | IN A | | | LOCATION APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. | | | 11.8.6.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL CONTAIN THE | | | FOLLOWING: | | | (1) VOICE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM PANELS AND CONTROLS | | | (2) FIRE DEPARTMENT TWO-WAY TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION | | | SERVICE | | | PANELS AND CONTROLS WHERE REQUIRED BY ANOTHER SECTION | | | OF THIS | | | CODE | | | (3) FIRE DETECTION AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATION | | | PANELS | | | (4) ELEVATOR FLOOR LOCATION AND OPERATION ANNUNCIATORS | | | (5) ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME | | | A17.1/CSA B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS AND ESCALATORS | | | (6) ELEVATOR EMERGENCY POWER SELECTOR SWITCH(ES) WHERE | | | PROVIDED | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME A17.1/CSA B44 | | | (7) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATERFLOW ANNUNCIATORS | | | (8) EMERGENCY GENERATOR STATUS INDICATORS | | | (9) CONTROLS FOR ANY AUTOMATIC STAIRWAY DOOR UNLOCKING | | | SYSTEM | | | (10) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS | | | (11) TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED | | | ACCESS TO THE | | | PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM | | | (12) STAIRWAY VIDEO MONITORING EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED BY | | | 11.8.8 | | | 13. RADIO | | | NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY | | | RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES. | | | 11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM | | | RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT | | | COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL | | | DETERMINED BY THE AHJ. | | | NFPA 72, 24.9 TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT | | | SYSTEMS. | | | 24.9.1 GENERAL. | | | 24.9.1.1 NON-INTERFERENCE. NO AMPLIFICATION SYSTEM | | | CAPABLE | | | OF OPERATING ON FREQUENCIES OR CAUSING INTERFERENCE ON | | | FREQUENCIES | | | ASSIGNED TO THE JURISDICTION BY THE FCC SHALL BE | | | INSTALLED | | | WITHOUT PRIOR COORDINATION AND APPROVAL OF THE | | | AUTHORITY | | | HAVING JURISDICTION. THE BUILDING MANAGER/OWNER SHALL | | | SUSPEND AND CORRECT OTHER EQUIPMENT INSTALLATIONS THAT | | | DEGRADE | | | THE PERFORMANCE OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO SYSTEM OR | | | PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM. | | | 24.9.1.2 APPROVAL AND PERMIT. PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED | | | FOR | | | APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. AT THE CONCLUSION OF | | | SUCCESSFUL | | | ACCEPTANCE TESTING, A RENEWABLE PERMIT SHALL BE ISSUED | | | FOR THE | | | PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM WHERE REQUIRED | | | BY | | | THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION. | | | | | | THE SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL | | | STRENGTH OF -95 DBM FOR THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST | | | PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE. TESTING SHALL BE BY AN | | | ACCEPTABLE NATIONAL STANDARD DOCUMENTING PERCENTAGES | | | NOTED ABOVE AND BY ACTUAL RADIO TESTING BY FIRE | | | PERSONNEL. IF THE MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A | | | BI-DIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH | | | A MINIMUM 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP. | | | | | | PLEASE CONTACT MARK FILLA, PALM BEACH COUNTY PUBLIC | | | SAFETY RADIO SYSTEMS MANAGER, [email protected], | | | 561-233-0837; AS OUR RADIOS OPERATE ON THEIR SYSTEM FOR | | | DETAILED RADIO FREQUENCY AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. | | | | | | | | | 14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS | | | BUILDING. | | | | | | ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS, | | | PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS. | | | | | | 15. THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA | | | 101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE PROTECTION | | | EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING: | | | | | | THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED, | | | INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204, | | | STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY | | | RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR | | | RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY | | | HAVING JURISDICTION. | | | | | | THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE | | | INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE | | | APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED | | | MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE | | | SYSTEM. | | | | | | ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL | | | INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.9. | | | | | | 16. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 17. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-12-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
11-12-2021 |
Time |
15:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
11-12-2021 |
Time |
15:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-11-12 15:58:26 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 506 DATURA Z21070016 | | | NOVEMBER 12, 2021 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN: | | | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE A COLUMN FOR CONDITION. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 9/16/21: | | | ? SATISFIED. CORDIA SEBESTENA IS A FLORIDA NATIVE NOT | | | AN EXOTIC SPECIES. CORRECT THE NOTE ON THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION LIST AND INCLUDE THE TREE IN THE ARBORIST | | | REPORT. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE | | | TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR | | | RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY | | | EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR | | | POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING | | | CONDITION FOR ALL TREES AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR | | | THE NATIVE TREES. | | | AMEND THE ARBORISTS REPORT TO INCLUDE THE NAME AND | | | SIGNATURE OF THE ARBORIST. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF PRIVATE OPEN SPACE | | | AS ALLOWED BY TABLE IV-7 AND DEFINITIONS IN SECTION | | | 94-109. SHOW HOW THE STANDARDS FOR THE TYPES OF OPEN | | | SPACE ARE MET FOR VEGETATED AREAS AND TREE CANOPY | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED ON TABLE IV-8. PUBLIC SIDEWALK IS | | | NOT PRIVATE OPEN SPACE SO SHOULD NOT BE CALLED OUT ON | | | THE OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM. | | | | | | 4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. STREET TREES NEED TO BE A | | | MINIMUM OF 20 FEET IN HEIGHT. LIMITATIONS FOR POWER | | | LINES NEED TO BE CONSIDERED, BUT CLEARANCE FOR | | | PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC AND PROVIDING SHADE FOR THE SIDEWALK | | | INTENT MUST BE MET. STREET TREES NEED TO BE DISTRIBUTED | | | ALONG THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF EACH INDIVIDUAL STREETSCAPE | | | SECTION. | | | | | | PER SECTION 94-113(B)(2) THE MAXIMUM SPACING IS 30 FEET | | | ON CENTER. TREES CAN BE PLACED ALONG CURB ADJACENT TO | | | PARKING ON QUADRILLE PLAZA AND TREE GRATES USED IF | | | NEEDED FOR SIDEWALK TRAVEL WIDTH NEEDED. TREES NEED TO | | | BE SPACED AT THE 30 FOOT MAXIMUM. | | | TREE NEEDS TO BE PLACED CLOSER TO EAST CORNER ON DATURA | | | AND ON THE WEST CORNER THE SIDEWALK SHIFTED WEST TO | | | ALLOW 2 TREES WEST OF THE GARAGE ENTRANCE. | | | | | | GREEN BUTTONWOOD WAS DISCUSSED AS THE STREET TREE | | | SELECTION, SILVER BUTTONWOOD CANNOT BE SUPPLIED AT THE | | | SPECIFICATIONS INDICATED AND WILL NOT MEET THE INTENT | | | OF PROVIDING CLEARANCE AND SHADE. | | | VISIBILITY TRIANGLE FOR THE DMP IS MEASURED FROM BACK | | | OF CURB IN THE REQUIRED SETBACK, NOT WITHIN THE | | | PROPERTY LINE. THIS WILL ALLOW STREET TREES TO BE | | | PLACED CLOSER TO THE CORNER OF DATURA AND QUADRILLE | | | PLAZA DRIVE. | | | | | | | | | 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF THE | | | REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE PER SECTION | | | 94-113 AND PROVIDE THE TYPICAL DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION. | | | THE AREA MUST BE 9 X14 FT PARALLEL TO THE CURB FOR EACH | | | TREE CONSISTING OF PLANTING AREA AND/OR STRUCTURAL | | | SOIL. | | | LOCATIONS MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLANS MEETING THE CODE | | | REQUIREMENTS IN ORDER TO RECEIVE APPROVAL. | | | THE LOCATIONS ARE NOT CLEAR AND APPEAR TO BE SHOWN IN | | | THE PLANTING SOIL AREAS. | | | LOCATIONS ARE SPECIFIED IN SECTION 94-113(D)2 FOR UNDER | | | ADJACENT PAVED AREAS. | | | PROVIDE A SEPARATE SHEET SHOWING LOCATIONS. | | | | | | 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THERE APPEAR TO BE CONFLICTS IN | | | SEVERAL LOCATIONS BETWEEN PROPOSED STREET TREES AND | | | DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. ADJUST DRAINAGE | | | LOCATIONS SO THEY DO NOT INFRINGE ON THE REQUIRED | | | PLANTING AREA OR STRUCTURAL SOIL. | | | THIS STILL NEEDS TO BE RESOLVED WITH THE FINAL | | | LOCATIONS OF THE STREET TREES. | | | ROOT BARRIERS NEED TO BE AT THE EDGE OF PLANTING AREAS, | | | NOT DIVIDING OFF THE SOIL AREAS FROM THE TREES. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN FOR DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVEL | | | TO THE PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLANT LIST FOR THE REQUIRED | | | PRIVATE OPEN SPACE. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | POINTS BASED ON THE PLANT LIST PER SECTION 94-442(G). | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. | | | PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT | | | MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED | | | ON THE PLANT LIST. | | | | | | PERCENTAGE SHOULD BE OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT | | | SPECIES OF THE TOTAL ADDED PLANTS. | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. PROVIDE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS ON THE CHART | | | FOR THE WEST EDGE OF THE LOT ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY | | | LINE. THERE MAY ALSO BE OPPORTUNITY TO IMPROVE SOME | | | AREAS ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING WITH HEDGING | | | OR PALMS. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 9/17/21: | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. DAHOON HOLLY TREES MUST MEET THE 12 FOOT | | | HEIGHT REQUIREMENT. | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. STAFF SUGGESTS ADDING 3 TALLER PALMS TO | | | THE WESTERN BUFFER BETWEEN THE PROPOSED TREES FOR | | | ADDITIONAL SCREENING OF THE PARKING GARAGE. | | | | | | 14. SATISFIED. ADD TRANSPLANTED SABAL PALMS TO THE | | | PLANT LIST THAT ARE PART OF THE FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-17-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-17-2021 |
Time |
13:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-17-2021 |
Time |
13:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-09-17 13:56:17 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 506 DATURA Z21070016 | | | SEPTEMBER 16, 2021 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN: | | | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE A COLUMN FOR CONDITION. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 9/16/21: | | | ? CORDIA SEBESTENA IS A FLORIDA NATIVE NOT AN EXOTIC | | | SPECIES. CORRECT THE NOTE ON THE TREE DISPOSITION LIST | | | AND INCLUDE THE TREE IN THE ARBORIST REPORT. | | | | | | 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES | | | NATIVE TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE | | | OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY | | | EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR | | | POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING | | | CONDITION FOR ALL TREES AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR | | | THE NATIVE TREES. | | | AMEND THE ARBORISTS REPORT TO INCLUDE THE NAME AND | | | SIGNATURE OF THE ARBORIST. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF PRIVATE OPEN SPACE | | | AS ALLOWED BY TABLE IV-7 AND DEFINITIONS IN SECTION | | | 94-109. SHOW HOW THE STANDARDS FOR THE TYPES OF OPEN | | | SPACE ARE MET FOR VEGETATED AREAS AND TREE CANOPY | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED ON TABLE IV-8. PUBLIC SIDEWALK IS | | | NOT PRIVATE OPEN SPACE SO SHOULD NOT BE CALLED OUT ON | | | THE OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM. | | | | | | 4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. STREET TREES NEED TO BE A | | | MINIMUM OF 20 FEET IN HEIGHT. LIMITATIONS FOR POWER | | | LINES NEED TO BE CONSIDERED, BUT CLEARANCE FOR | | | PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC AND PROVIDING SHADE FOR THE SIDEWALK | | | INTENT MUST BE MET. STREET TREES NEED TO BE DISTRIBUTED | | | ALONG THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF EACH INDIVIDUAL STREETSCAPE | | | SECTION. | | | | | | PER SECTION 94-113(B)(2) THE MAXIMUM SPACING IS 30 FEET | | | ON CENTER. TREES CAN BE PLACED ALONG CURB ADJACENT TO | | | PARKING ON QUADRILLE PLAZA AND TREE GRATES USED IF | | | NEEDED FOR SIDEWALK TRAVEL WIDTH NEEDED. TREES NEED TO | | | BE SPACED AT THE 30 FOOT MAXIMUM. | | | TREE NEEDS TO BE PLACED CLOSER TO EAST CORNER ON DATURA | | | AND ON THE WEST CORNER THE SIDEWALK SHIFTED WEST TO | | | ALLOW 2 TREES WEST OF THE GARAGE ENTRANCE. | | | | | | | | | 5. NOT SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF THE REQUIRED | | | STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE PER SECTION 94-113 AND | | | PROVIDE THE TYPICAL DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION. THE AREA | | | MUST BE 9 X14 FT PARALLEL TO THE CURB FOR EACH TREE | | | CONSISTING OF PLANTING AREA AND/OR STRUCTURAL SOIL. | | | LOCATIONS MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLANS MEETING THE CODE | | | REQUIREMENTS IN ORDER TO RECEIVE APPROVAL. | | | | | | 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THERE APPEAR TO BE CONFLICTS IN | | | SEVERAL LOCATIONS BETWEEN PROPOSED STREET TREES AND | | | DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. ADJUST DRAINAGE | | | LOCATIONS SO THEY DO NOT INFRINGE ON THE REQUIRED | | | PLANTING AREA OR STRUCTURAL SOIL. | | | THIS STILL NEEDS TO BE RESOLVED WITH THE FINAL | | | LOCATIONS OF THE STREET TREES. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN FOR DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVEL | | | TO THE PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLANT LIST FOR THE REQUIRED | | | PRIVATE OPEN SPACE. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | POINTS BASED ON THE PLANT LIST PER SECTION 94-442(G). | | | | | | 10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION | | | 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF | | | PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED | | | ON THE PLANT LIST. | | | | | | PERCENTAGE SHOULD BE OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT | | | SPECIES OF THE TOTAL ADDED PLANTS. | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. PROVIDE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS ON THE CHART | | | FOR THE WEST EDGE OF THE LOT ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY | | | LINE. THERE MAY ALSO BE OPPORTUNITY TO IMPROVE SOME | | | AREAS ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING WITH HEDGING | | | OR PALMS. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 9/17/21: | | | | | | 12. DAHOON HOLLY TREES MUST MEET THE 12 FOOT HEIGHT | | | REQUIREMENT. | | | | | | 13. STAFF SUGGESTS ADDING 3 TALLER PALMS TO THE WESTERN | | | BUFFER BETWEEN THE PROPOSED TREES FOR ADDITIONAL | | | SCREENING OF THE PARKING GARAGE. | | | | | | 14. ADD TRANSPLANTED SABAL PALMS TO THE PLANT LIST THAT | | | ARE PART OF THE FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-11-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
08-11-2021 |
Time |
15:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
08-11-2021 |
Time |
15:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-08-11 15:51:06 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 506 DATURA Z21070016 | | | AUGUST 10, 2021 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN: | | | ? PROVIDE A COLUMN FOR CONDITION. | | | | | | 2. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES IN GOOD | | | CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A | | | 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY | | | RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION. | | | PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING CONDITION FOR ALL | | | TREES AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE TREES. | | | | | | 3. IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AS ALLOWED | | | BY TABLE IV-7 AND DEFINITIONS IN SECTION 94-109. SHOW | | | HOW THE STANDARDS FOR THE TYPES OF OPEN SPACE ARE MET | | | FOR VEGETATED AREAS AND TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE | | | BASED ON TABLE IV-8. PUBLIC SIDEWALK IS NOT PRIVATE | | | OPEN SPACE SO SHOULD NOT BE CALLED OUT ON THE OPEN | | | SPACE DIAGRAM. | | | | | | 4. STREET TREES NEED TO BE A MINIMUM OF 20 FEET IN | | | HEIGHT. LIMITATIONS FOR POWER LINES NEED TO BE | | | CONSIDERED, BUT CLEARANCE FOR PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC AND | | | PROVIDING SHADE FOR THE SIDEWALK INTENT MUST BE MET. | | | STREET TREES NEED TO BE DISTRIBUTED ALONG THE ENTIRE | | | LENGTH OF EACH INDIVIDUAL STREETSCAPE SECTION. | | | | | | 5. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF THE REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL | | | UNDER HARDSCAPE PER SECTION 94-113 AND PROVIDE THE | | | TYPICAL DETAIL FOR INSTALLATION. THE AREA MUST BE 9 X14 | | | FT PARALLEL TO THE CURB FOR EACH TREE CONSISTING OF | | | PLANTING AREA AND/OR STRUCTURAL SOIL. | | | | | | 6. THERE APPEAR TO BE CONFLICTS IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS | | | BETWEEN PROPOSED STREET TREES AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. ADJUST DRAINAGE LOCATIONS SO THEY DO | | | NOT INFRINGE ON THE REQUIRED PLANTING AREA OR | | | STRUCTURAL SOIL. | | | | | | 7. ADD A COLUMN FOR DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVEL TO THE | | | PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 8. PROVIDE A PLANT LIST FOR THE REQUIRED PRIVATE OPEN | | | SPACE. | | | | | | 9. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED FLORIDA FRIENDLY POINTS BASED | | | ON THE PLANT LIST PER SECTION 94-442(G). | | | | | | 10. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT | | | SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL | | | ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT | | | SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF | | | SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA | | | WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA | | | LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED ON THE | | | PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 11. PROVIDE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS ON THE CHART FOR THE | | | WEST EDGE OF THE LOT ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY LINE. | | | THERE MAY ALSO BE OPPORTUNITY TO IMPROVE SOME AREAS | | | ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING WITH HEDGING OR | | | PALMS. | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PU |
PUBLIC UTILITIES |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mtechnow |
Date |
01-11-2022 |
Time |
10:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-01-11 10:21:36 | -LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATIONS | | | - PLEASE ADD NOTE THAT THIS IS WITHIN LS 21 SERVICE | | | AREA. | | | -NOTE TO CUT AND CAP UNUSED SERVICES AT THE MAIN. | | | -PROVIDE PROFILE OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS FROM TAP TO | | | POINT OF SERVICE. | | | -SHOW/CALL OUT UTILITY CONFLICTS. | | | -CALL OUT SIZE OF GAS MAIN. | | | -CALL OUT HORIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN CITY UTILITIES | | | AND EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. | | | -PROVIDE NAVD CONVERSION ON THE SCALE. | | | -SHOW ALL EXISTING DRY UTILITIES. | | | -WHAT SIZE IS THE GREASE TRAP CONNECTION? | | | -PLEASE SHOW ALL VALVES, SHOW PIPE TYPE AND SIZE. | | | | | | CONTACT MIKE TECHNOW AT [email protected] WITH ANY | | | QUESTIONS | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PU |
PUBLIC UTILITIES |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-13-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
09-13-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
09-13-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-09-13 11:15:26 | PASSED WITH A PROVISO. THE COMPACTOR CONTAINER(S) SHALL | | | BE FRONT LOAD TYPE AND ON WHEEL IN ORDER FOR THE CITY | | | COLLECTION TRUCK TO BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THE SERVICE. | | | | | | NOTE: THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS | | | THE DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT FINALIZED. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 822-2045 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-02-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
08-02-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
08-02-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-08-02 15:17:58 | | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS: | | | 1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID | | | WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE, TYPE AND | | | QUANTITY OF THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR) | | | THAT WILL BE UTILIZED THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE | | | SANITATION SERVICE. | | | 2- DETAILS FOR SANITATION SERVICE (I.E. SOLID WASTE | | | CONTAINER(S) TYPE, COLLECTION LOCATION, ETC.). | | | 3- AUTOTURN EXHIBIT (DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE VEHICLE?S | | | WHEEL PATH) FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER | | | TRUCK WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECS: | | | - DUAL AXLES | | | - TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT | | | - TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT | | | - TURNING RADIUS: | | | - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT | | | - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT | | | - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT | | | 4- GREASE CONTAINERS OR TANKS. OWNERS AND/OR OCCUPANTS | | | OF PROPERTY THAT REQUIRE GREASE HAULING SERVICES SHALL | | | ENSURE THAT THEIR GREASE TANKS OR CONTAINERS REMAIN | | | CLEAN, AND ARE ENCLOSED AND NOT IN PUBLIC VIEW. | | | 5- DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP AND | | | RECYCLING CONTAINERS | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-30-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
09-30-2021 |
Time |
15:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
09-30-2021 |
Time |
15:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-09-30 15:46:18 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FORM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | 9/1/21 SUBMITTAL (PDG PLAN RECEIVED 9/30/21): | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE A GRADING PLAN INCLUDING PROPOSED FINISHED | | | FLOOR ELEVATION. | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE A DEMOLITION PLAN OF THE SITE AND ADJACENT | | | RIGHT OF WAY. | | | | | | 3. NUMBER THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND | | | SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURES FOR EASE OF REFERENCE. | | | | | | 4. WHY IS THE EXISTING INLET EAST OF THE 22 FEET WIDE | | | DRIVEWAY ON DATURA STREET BEING REMOVED? CAN IT BE | | | CONVERTED TO A MANHOLE TOP? | | | | | | 5. WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THE TWO STORM PIPES CONNECTED | | | TO THE EXISTING INLET BEING REMOVED? | | | | | | 6. THE PIPE BETWEEN INLET PROPOSED ALONG THE CURB LINE | | | OF DATURA STREET AT THE EAST END OF THE BUILDING AND | | | THE EXISTING INLET PROPOSED TO BE CONVERTED TO A | | | MANHOLE MAY NEED TO BE UPSIZED. | | | | | | 7. FOR THE PARKING SPACE BETWEEN THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS | | | TO DATURA STREET, IS IT NECESSARY TO ADJUST THE EAST | | | CURB? CAN STRIPING BE PROPOSED INSTEAD? WHAT | | | ADJUSTMENTS WILL BE MADE TO THE EXISTING DRAINAGE | | | INLET? | | | | | | 8. LABEL PIPE DIAMETERS AND PIPE MATERIAL FOR EXISTING | | | STORM PIPES. | | | | | | 9. THE CITY DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF BLEEDERS IN | | | CONTROL STRUCTURES FOR EXFILTRATION TRENCH SYSTEMS. | | | | | | 10. PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION FROM THE CENTERLINE OF | | | QUADRILLE BLVD PLAZA TO THE FACE OF THE BUILDING. | | | PROVIDE DIMENSIONS OF ON-STREET PARKING AND DISTANCE | | | BETWEEN BACK OF CURB AND PROPERTY/RIGHT OF WAY LINE. | | | SHOW GRADE BREAKS AND SLOPE ARROWS WITH SLOPES. | | | | | | 11. PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION FROM WEST PROPERTY LINE TO | | | THE FACE OF THE BUILDING DEMONSTRATING THERE WILL NOT | | | BE DIRECT RUNOFF ONTO THE ADJACENT PARCEL. | | | | | | 12. SECTION A-A (ALLEY CROSS SECTION) ON SHEET CP101: | | | A. WIDTH OF ALLEY IS MISLABELED; | | | B. INDICATE THE VERTICAL DROP DISTANCE AT THE PROPERTY | | | LINE AND SHOW THE CURB OR THICKENED EDGE; | | | C. SHOW THE WIDTH OF THE PLANTING AREA ADJACENT TO THE | | | BUILDING; | | | D. THE CROSS SECTION SYMBOL ON SHEET CP100 SHOULD POINT | | | TO THE EAST. | | | | | | 13. IF THE SIDEWALK NORTH OF THE ALLEY IS TO BE ADA | | | COMPLIANT THEN CURB RAMPS WILL BE NEEDED ON EACH SIDE | | | OF THE 20? WIDE DRIVEWAY. | | | | | | 14. ONSITE DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND THE ROOF DRAINS | | | CONNECTED TO THEM SHOULD BE DESIGN SO THE MANHOLE LIDS | | | DO NOT BECOME DISLODGED DURING AN INTENSE STORM EVENT. | | | | | | 15. STORM PIPE NOT SHOWN ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE | | | BUILDING. | | | | | | 16. ANY STORM PIPE PROPOSED IN THE RIGHT OF WAY TO BE | | | RCP, MINIMUM 15? DIAMETER. | | | | | | 17. ON SHEET CP100, INCLUDE IN THE LEGEND THE VARIOUS | | | HATCHING PATTERNS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. | | | | | | 18. USE THE LINE TYPES IN THE LEGEND ON SHEET CP100 FOR | | | THE EXISTING STORMWATER PIPES (STM VS. SD) AND STORM | | | MANHOLES (CIRCLES WITH D VS. CIRCLES WITH SD). | | | | | | 19. IF THE ASPHALT IS MODIFIED (TOUCHED) ADJACENT TO | | | THE CURB RAMPS AT THE NORTHEAST AND SOUTHEAST CORNERS | | | OF THE SITE (DATURA ST/QUADRILLE PLAZA DRIVE AND | | | ALLEY/QUADRILLE PLAZA DRIVE INTERSECTIONS, | | | RESPECTIVELY) THEN THE CURB RAMPS WILL NEED TO BE | | | RECONSTRUCTED TO CURRENT ADA REQUIREMENTS IF THEY DO | | | NOT MEET THE CURRENT ADA REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 (O) | | | 561-351-0510 (M) | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-12-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
08-12-2021 |
Time |
09:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
08-12-2021 |
Time |
09:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-08-12 09:29:16 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. THE CITY'S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM PER CITY CODE IS | | | NGVD1929. THE CITY IS ALLOWING SURVEYS AND PLANS TO USE | | | NAVD1988 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION EQUATION BETWEEN | | | NAVD1988 AND NGVD1929 IS ALSO PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE | | | CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 ON THE SURVEYS. | | | | | | 2. LABEL THE VERTICAL DATUM AND PROVIDED THE CONVERSION | | | EQUATION TO NGVD1929 WHEN ELEVATIONS ARE ADDED TO THE | | | ENGINEERING PLANS. | | | | | | 3. THE EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM ON DATURA STREET IS | | | AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED CURBED BULBOUTS. SHOW HOW THE | | | SYSTEM WILL BE MODIFIED. | | | | | | 4. PROVIDE TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS FROM CENTERLINE OF | | | STREET TO FACE OF BUILDING. SHOW AND DIMENSION THE | | | RIGHT OF WAY FROM THE BACK OF SIDEWALK. | | | | | | 5. PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION OF THE ALLEY FROM FACE OF | | | THE BUILDING ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE ALLEY TO THE FACE | | | OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING. SHOW GRADE BREAKS AND | | | DIMENSIONS TO MAJOR FEATURES (R/W, C&G, BUILDING FACE, | | | SIDEWALK, ETC.) | | | | | | 6. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP | | | CRITERIA FOR WATER QUALITY TREATMENT AND PEAK FLOW. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | | | | 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED | | | WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP PERMIT(S) BEFORE START OF | | | CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 4. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WITH THE | | | ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 (O) | | | 561-351-0510 (M) | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
11-17-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
11-17-2021 |
Time |
07:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-11-17 07:34:55 | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. REPLAT PRIOR TO C.O. | | | 2. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN | | | RIGHT-OF-WAYS. | | | 3. SIDEWALK/ACCESS/UTILITY EASEMENTS BY PLAT OR | | | SEPARATE INSTRUMENT PRIOR TO C.O. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-11-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
08-11-2021 |
Time |
07:08 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-08-11 07:46:14 | 1. NEED OVERALL SURVEY. RE-PLAT WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | 2. IT APPEARS THAT IMPROVEMENTS/UTILITIES WITHIN THE | | | ALLEY WILL PREVENT TRUCK LOADING/UNLOADING. | | | 3. SIDEWALK EASEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED ALONG QUADRILLE | | | PLAZA DRIVE. | | | 4. ANY IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN RIGHT-OF-WAY WILL REQUIRE A | | | MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-02-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
02-02-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-02-02 16:44:40 | APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: | | | 1) THE ON-STREET PICK-UP/DROP-OFF AREA ALONG QUADRILLE | | | PLAZA DR MUST BE FOR RIDE-SHARE USE ONLY. UNDER THE | | | DISCRETION OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER: IN CASE OF | | | CONTINUOUS VIOLATION(S) OF ITS DESIGNATED USE OR IN | | | CASE OF SIGNIFICANT NEGATIVE IMPACTS TO TRAFFIC | | | CIRCULATION AND ARISE OF TRANSPORTATION SAFETY | | | CONCERNS, OPERATIONS AT SUCH AREA WILL BE TEMPORARILY | | | OR PERMANENTLY SUSPENDED UNTIL PROPER MITIGATION | | | MEASURES ARE PROPOSED, REVIEWED, APPROVED, AND | | | IMPLEMENTED. | | | 2) FINAL SITE PLAN DRAWINGS TO BE CORRECTED AND UPDATED | | | PER THE LATEST ROUND OF COMMENTS | | | | | | TRAFFIC COMMENTS: | | | 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE SITE PLAN IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY | | | 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | 3) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC | | | CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS AND PARKING | | | STALLS) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING | | | THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. PROVIDE DETAILS FOR ALL | | | STREETS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING | | | AS-IS ONES. IN FIGURE 4. DATURA AND QUADRILLE ARE | | | MISSING CURB CUTS AND ON-STREET PARKING MARKINGS. | | | PLEASE REVISE THE SITE PLAN ACCORDINGLY. NOTE: FPL WILL | | | DEVELOP A PROPERTY ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF DATURA, WE | | | CAN PROVIDE THE SITE PLAN UPON REQUEST. | | | 4) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE | | | TRUCK AND SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE | | | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES | | | CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A | | | SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. DESIGN VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONS | | | SHOULD BE SHOWCASED IN THE DRAWING(S). ROAD | | | CONFIGURATION AND FEATURES ALONG THE ALLEYWAY (I.E. | | | POLES, CURB, EXISTING LOADING ACCESS, TRASH BINS, | | | TEMPORARY PARKING STALLS, LANDSCAPE ISLANDS) SHOULD BE | | | PRECISELY DEPICTED AND TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT. A SITE VISIT | | | IS STRONGLY ENCOURAGED. PLEASE VERIFY, REVISE AND | | | RESUBMIT. | | | 5) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY | | | ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 | | | FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS | | | (CIRCUIT BOX AND ELECTRIC CONDUIT | | | 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE | | | NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, | | | INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES | | | 7) SATISFIED. RE-DO AND RESUBMIT AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR | | | THE EASTBOUND MOVEMENT. SEE COMMENT #4 | | | 8) SATISFIED. PROPOSED VALET OPERATIONS AND PICK-UP | | | LOCATION DO NOT SEEM SAFE AND SOUND. PLEASE REVISE AND | | | RESUBMIT VALET CIRCULATION PLANS AND CORRESPONDING | | | NARRATIVE. | | | 9) SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE LOCATION OF BICYCLE RACKS IN | | | THE SITE PLAN OR INDICATE REFERENCE SHEET | | | 10) SATISFIED. PROVIDE ROADWAY WIDTHS AND OFF-SITE | | | PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS IN THE SITE PLAN OR INDICATE | | | REFERENCE SHEET | | | 11) SATISFIED. PROVIDE CROSSWALK MARKINGS IN THE SITE | | | PLAN OR INDICATE REFERENCE SHEET | | | 12) SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF EXISTING AND | | | FUTURE METERED PARKING STALLS ALONG PROPERTY LINE. | | | COORDINATE WITH PARKING DEPARTMENT PERTAINING PARKING | | | METER REMOVAL, IF ANY | | | 13) SATISFIED. INSERT ITE LAND USE CODES IN TABLE 1 AND | | | PROVIDE ITE TRIP GENERATION REFERENCE RATES/PAGES IN | | | THE APPENDIX. | | | 14) SATISFIED. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE USE OF THE DROP-OFF | | | LOCATION ALONG QUADRILLE PLAZA DR | | | 15) SATISFIED. SITE PLAN SHOWS A STRAIGHT THROUGH ARROW | | | ON ALLEYWAY EAST SIDE. EXISTING CONDITIONS HAVE A RIGHT | | | TURN ARROW. REVISE THE SITE PLAN ACCORDINGLY OR PROVIDE | | | A JUSTIFICATION TO THE PAVEMENT MARKING CHANGE | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-14-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
01-14-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-01-14 18:36:46 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS | | | 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE SITE PLAN IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY | | | 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | 3) NOT SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE | | | BASIC CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS AND | | | PARKING STALLS) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS | | | SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. PROVIDE DETAILS | | | FOR ALL STREETS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, | | | INCLUDING AS-IS ONES. IN FIGURE 4. DATURA AND QUADRILLE | | | ARE MISSING CURB CUTS AND ON-STREET PARKING MARKINGS. | | | PLEASE REVISE THE SITE PLAN ACCORDINGLY. NOTE: FPL WILL | | | DEVELOP A PROPERTY ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF DATURA, WE | | | CAN PROVIDE THE SITE PLAN UPON REQUEST. | | | 4) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE | | | TRUCK AND SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE | | | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES | | | CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A | | | SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. DESIGN VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONS | | | SHOULD BE SHOWCASED IN THE DRAWING(S). ROAD | | | CONFIGURATION AND FEATURES ALONG THE ALLEYWAY (I.E. | | | POLES, CURB, EXISTING LOADING ACCESS, TRASH BINS, | | | TEMPORARY PARKING STALLS, LANDSCAPE ISLANDS) SHOULD BE | | | PRECISELY DEPICTED AND TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT. A SITE VISIT | | | IS STRONGLY ENCOURAGED. PLEASE VERIFY, REVISE AND | | | RESUBMIT. | | | 5) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY | | | ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 | | | FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS | | | (CIRCUIT BOX AND ELECTRIC CONDUIT | | | 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE | | | NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, | | | INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES | | | 7) NOT SATISFIED. RE-DO AND RESUBMIT AUTOTURN ANALYSIS | | | FOR THE EASTBOUND MOVEMENT. SEE COMMENT #4 | | | 8) SATISFIED. PROPOSED VALET OPERATIONS AND PICK-UP | | | LOCATION DO NOT SEEM SAFE AND SOUND. PLEASE REVISE AND | | | RESUBMIT VALET CIRCULATION PLANS AND CORRESPONDING | | | NARRATIVE. | | | 9) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE LOCATION OF BICYCLE RACKS | | | IN THE SITE PLAN OR INDICATE REFERENCE SHEET | | | 10) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE ROADWAY WIDTHS AND OFF-SITE | | | PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS IN THE SITE PLAN OR INDICATE | | | REFERENCE SHEET | | | 11) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE CROSSWALK MARKINGS IN THE | | | SITE PLAN OR INDICATE REFERENCE SHEET | | | 12) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF EXISTING AND | | | FUTURE METERED PARKING STALLS ALONG PROPERTY LINE. | | | COORDINATE WITH PARKING DEPARTMENT PERTAINING PARKING | | | METER REMOVAL, IF ANY | | | 13) NOT SATISFIED. INSERT ITE LAND USE CODES IN TABLE 1 | | | AND PROVIDE ITE TRIP GENERATION REFERENCE RATES/PAGES | | | IN THE APPENDIX. | | | 14) NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE USE OF THE | | | DROP-OFF LOCATION ALONG QUADRILLE PLAZA DR | | | 15) NOT SATISFIED. SITE PLAN SHOWS A STRAIGHT THROUGH | | | ARROW ON ALLEYWAY EAST SIDE. EXISTING CONDITIONS HAVE A | | | RIGHT TURN ARROW. REVISE THE SITE PLAN ACCORDINGLY OR | | | PROVIDE A JUSTIFICATION TO THE PAVEMENT MARKING CHANGE | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-15-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
10-15-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-10-14 13:08:25 | 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE SITE PLAN IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY | | | 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | 3) NOT SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE | | | BASIC CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS AND | | | PARKING STALLS) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS | | | SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. PROVIDE DETAILS | | | FOR ALL STREETS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, | | | INCLUDING AS-IS ONES. IN FIGURE 4. DATURA AND QUADRILLE | | | ARE MISSING CURB CUTS AND ON-STREET PARKING MARKINGS. | | | PLEASE REVISE THE SITE PLAN ACCORDINGLY. NOTE: FPL WILL | | | DEVELOP A PROPERTY ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF DATURA, WE | | | CAN PROVIDE THE SITE PLAN UPON REQUEST. | | | 4) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE | | | TRUCK AND SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE | | | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES | | | CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A | | | SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. DESIGN VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONS | | | SHOULD BE SHOWCASED IN THE DRAWING(S). ROAD | | | CONFIGURATION AND FEATURES ALONG THE ALLEYWAY (I.E. | | | POLES, CURB, EXISTING LOADING ACCESS, TRASH BINS, | | | TEMPORARY PARKING STALLS, LANDSCAPE ISLANDS) SHOULD BE | | | PRECISELY DEPICTED AND TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT. A SITE VISIT | | | IS STRONGLY ENCOURAGED. PLEASE VERIFY, REVISE AND | | | RESUBMIT. | | | 5) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY | | | ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 | | | FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS | | | (CIRCUIT BOX AND ELECTRIC CONDUIT | | | 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE | | | NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, | | | INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES | | | 7) NOT SATISFIED. RE-DO AND RESUBMIT AUTOTURN ANALYSIS | | | FOR THE EASTBOUND MOVEMENT. SEE COMMENT #4 | | | 8) SATISFIED. PROPOSED VALET OPERATIONS AND PICK-UP | | | LOCATION DO NOT SEEM SAFE AND SOUND. PLEASE REVISE AND | | | RESUBMIT VALET CIRCULATION PLANS AND CORRESPONDING | | | NARRATIVE. | | | 9) PROVIDE THE LOCATION OF BICYCLE RACKS IN THE SITE | | | PLAN OR INDICATE REFERENCE SHEET | | | 10) PROVIDE ROADWAY WIDTHS AND OFF-SITE PARKING STALL | | | DIMENSIONS IN THE SITE PLAN OR INDICATE REFERENCE SHEET | | | 11) PROVIDE CROSSWALK MARKINGS IN THE SITE PLAN OR | | | INDICATE REFERENCE SHEET | | | 12) PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF EXISTING AND FUTURE METERED | | | PARKING STALLS ALONG PROPERTY LINE. COORDINATE WITH | | | PARKING DEPARTMENT PERTAINING PARKING METER REMOVAL, IF | | | ANY | | | 13) INSERT ITE LAND USE CODES IN TABLE 1 AND PROVIDE | | | ITE TRIP GENERATION REFERENCE RATES/PAGES IN THE | | | APPENDIX | | | 14) PLEASE EXPLAIN THE USE OF THE DROP-OFF LOCATION | | | ALONG QUADRILLE PLAZA DR | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-12-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
08-12-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-08-12 12:47:43 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS | | | 1) PROVIDE SITE PLAN IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY | | | 2) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | 3) ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS | | | (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE | | | OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT | | | 4) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND | | | SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES CLEARLY | | | DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE | | | FILE/DRAWING | | | 5) IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY ACCESSIBLE | | | MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 FEET) AND | | | PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS (CIRCUIT BOX | | | AND ELECTRIC CONDUIT) | | | 6) PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF | | | REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA | | | AND BICYCLE ONES | | | 7) RE-DO AND RESUBMIT AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR THE | | | EASTBOUND MOVEMENT | | | 8) PROPOSED VALET OPERATIONS AND PICK-UP LOCATION DO | | | NOT SEEM SAFE AND SOUND. PLEASE REVISE AND RESUBMIT | | | VALET CIRCULATION PLANS AND CORRESPONDING NARRATIVE | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-02-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ckimmerl |
Date |
02-02-2022 |
Time |
16:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ckimmerl |
Date |
02-02-2022 |
Time |
16:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-02-02 16:04:52 | PASSED WITH CONDITIONS INCLUDED WITHIN SITE PLAN | | | APPROVAL LETTER. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-19-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ckimmerl |
Date |
11-19-2021 |
Time |
14:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ckimmerl |
Date |
11-19-2021 |
Time |
14:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-11-19 14:49:24 | PREVIOUS COMMENTS: | | | | | | SETBACKS | | | 2. SETBACK IS MEASURED FROM THE PROMINENT CURB-LINE | | | LOCATION (+50% OF FRONTAGE) LANDSCAPE PLANS INCORRECTLY | | | LABEL THE BACK OF CURB ALONG DATURA STREET, SITE PLAN | | | SHOWS BACK OF CURB COINCIDING WITH THE ON STREET | | | PARKING SPACE. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | | | | OPEN SPACE | | | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON PRIVATE OPEN SPACE | | | (SEC. 94-109 TABLE IV-7), SPECIFYING THE AMOUNT, | | | LOCATION, AND TYPE OF SPACE. CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH | | | STANDARDS LOCATED IN TABLE FOR EACH TYPE OF SPACE. | | | PROJECT COMPLIES WITH THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE | | | REQUIREMENTS WITH THE 7TH FLOOR TERRACE AND ROOFTOP | | | GARDEN ON THE 19TH FLOOR. PLEASE REMOVE THE GROUND | | | FLOOR PRIVATE OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM AND CALCULATIONS, AS | | | THE GROUND FLOOR AREAS SHOWN WOULD NOT MEET THE CODE | | | REQUIREMENTS OR CONSTITUTE AS A PRIVATE/PUBLIC OPEN | | | SPACE. | | | [SATISFIED] CONFIRM WITH LANDSCAPE PLANNER RAY | | | | | | ACTIVE USE | | | 4.PROPOSED PROJECT IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM | | | GROUND ACTIVE USES (65%) ALONG PRIMARY PEDESTRIAN | | | STREETS (DATURA). SEE TABLE IV-42 BUILDING REQUIREMENTS | | | QBD 10-25. VARIANCE IS BEING SOUGHT TO REDUCE ACTIVE | | | USE REQUIREMENT FROM 65% TO 30%, WARRANTS ADDITIONAL | | | DISCUSSION W/ STAFF. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | | | | 5. PROPOSED PROJECT IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM | | | LINER ACTIVE USES [2 TO 5 STORIES (80?)] WHICH REQUIRES | | | 60% ALONG PRIMARY PEDESTRIAN STREETS (DATURA). VARIANCE | | | IS BEING SOUGHT TO REDUCE ACTIVE USE LINER REQUIREMENT | | | FROM FLOORS 2 TO 5, FROM 60% TO X%, WARRANTS ADDITIONAL | | | DISCUSSION W/ STAFF. | | | [NOT SATISFIED] WILL REQUIRE VARIANCE | | | | | | STREETSCAPE | | | 6. PLEASE PROVIDE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN FOR THE SITE. | | | PHOTOMETRIC PLAN IS PROVIDED, HOWEVER PROJECT SITE | | | PHOTOMETRICS ARE NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CODE. REQUIRED | | | MINIMUM OF 0.6 FOOT CANDLES AS MEASURED AT THE BACK | | | EDGE OF THE CURB AND ONE FOOT ABOVE THE | | | SIDEWALK.SPECIFY THE LIGHT FIXTURE SPECS. MAKE SURE | | | PROPOSED FIXTURES ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY | | | STANDARDS. CITY/DMP LIGHTNING SPECS REQUIRE 13 FT. | | | POLES WITH BOTH THE POLES AND LIGHT FIXTURES BEING | | | BLACK IN COLOR. ADHERE TO DOWNTOWN STANDARD ALONG | | | DATURA. DECORATIVE FIXTURES ALONG QUADRILLE PLAZA SHALL | | | MATCH EXISTING FIXTURES INSTALLED IN FRONT OF STATION. | | | [NOT SATISFIED] STREET FIXTURE AND POLE SHALL MEET CITY | | | STANDARDS AND MATCH MANUFACTURER. PHOTOMETRICS NOT MET | | | AT CURBLINE, DRAWING SHOWS AREAS WITH 0.0 AND 0.1 AND | | | VALUES LOWER THAN REQUIRED MINIMUM OF 0.6. | | | | | | 7. PROVIDE LANDSCAPE PLAN WITH STREET TREES ALONG | | | QUADRILLE PLAZA DRIVE AND DATURA STREET, NEXT TO CURB. | | | (SEC. 94-113) STREET TREES SHALL BE PLANTED AND SPACED | | | EVERY 30 FT. ALONG ENTIRE FRONTAGE. TREE PLACEMENT | | | SHALL BE AS CLOSE TO THE CURB AS POSSIBLE. RECOMMEND | | | SEPARATE MEETING WITH STAFF TO DISCUSS | | | LANDSCAPE/STREETSCAPE CHANGES ALONG QUADRILLE PLAZA DR. | | | AND DATURA ST. | | | [SATISFIED] TREE SPECIES ALONG QUADRILLE TO MATCH GREEN | | | BUTTONWOOD ON BRIGHTLINE? - FOLLOW UP WITH LANDSCAPE | | | PLANNER RAY | | | | | | | | | BIKES, PARKING, & LOADING | | | 9. AS PER ARTICLE IV: SEC. 94-111, BICYCLE PARKING MUST | | | INCLUDE: C) ADDITIONALLY, 1 SPACE PER 100 FT. OF STREET | | | FRONTAGE; TO BE LOCATED ALONG ROW OR STREET FRONTAGES | | | FOR PUBLIC ACCESS.PLEASE PROVIDE 4 ADDITIONAL BIKE | | | RACKS WITHIN THE PUBLIC ROW. PLEASE INCLUDE A HARDSCAPE | | | PLAN INCLUDING ALL ELEMENTS ALONG THE STREETSCAPE. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | | | | 10. PLEASE INCLUDE TABLE OF PARKING REQUIREMENTS: A) | | | EXPLAIN IF PARKING IS COMBINED BETWEEN USES OR IF USE | | | WILL HAVE SEGREGATED SPACES. PLEASE INDICATE IF THE | | | PARKING FOR RESIDENTIAL AND HOTEL USES ARE COMMON POOL | | | OR IF THEY ARE RESERVED SPACES. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE | | | LABEL THE SPACES FOR BOTH COMMERCIAL AND GUEST PARKING. | | | B) # OF SPACES REQUIRED PER USE & # OF SPACES PROVIDED | | | [SATISFIED] | | | | | | | | | 11. SPECIFY AUTOTURN AND SERVICE ACCESS/LOADING FOR THE | | | SITE. PLEASE INCLUDE WITHIN SITE PLAN, GROUND FLOOR | | | PLAN, OR SEPARATE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | | | | | | | FACADE ARTICULATION | | | 12. ARTIFICIAL GREENERY/MATERIALS OR ELEMENTS ARE NOT | | | PERMITTED ON THE FACADE/VISIBLE FROM THE ROW. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DETAILS OF THE PROPOSED VERTICAL | | | VEGETATION SYSTEM. | | | [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] WHAT PLANT MATERIAL GOES WITHIN? | | | IS IRRIGATION PROVIDED? | | | | | | GENERAL SITE | | | 14. PROVIDE SITE TABLE WITH: A) SITE AREA. PLEASE | | | ADDRESS THE DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE GROSS BUILDING AREA | | | (GBA) AND FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) VALUES BETWEEN SHEETS | | | A-0.03 (231,228 SF) AND A-0.04 (232,370 SF), THE | | | OVERALL AREA VALUE SHALL BE THE SAME. B) GROSS BUILDING | | | AREA ALLOWED. C) [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] GROSS BUILDING | | | AREA PROPOSED. GROUND FLOOR GBA CALCULATION AND | | | DIAGRAMS SHALL INCLUDE THE VALET ROOM, AND ASSOCIATED | | | BIKE ROOM SHOWER/BATHROOM AREA. | | | [NOT SATISFIED] DISCREPANCY STILL PERSISTS. NUMBER IN | | | FAR TABLE IN SHEET A-0.04 DOES NOT MATCH INFO IN SHEET | | | A-0.03 AND A-1.00. THE BIKEROOM CAN BE EXCLUDED FROM | | | THE COUNT, JUST INCLUDE THE SHOWER/BATHROOM PORTION. | | | THE FIRE COMMAND ROOM CAN BE EXCLUDED FROM GBA TOO. | | | INCLUDE LINEN AND TRASH ROOM ON 7TH FLOOR. INCLUDE FOOD | | | PREP STORAGE IN 19TH FLOOR. CONFIRM THAT OUTDOOR FOOD | | | SERVICE IS NOT ENCLOSED. | | | | | | | | | 18. FDC SHALL BE WALL MOUNTED. FDC NOT SHOWN AS WALL | | | MOUNTED ON SHEET A-2.01, ADDITIONALLY LP-1.01 IS NOT | | | UPDATED AND SHOWS FDC AND DDAC ON FRONTAGE BEHIND | | | LANDSCAPE SCREENING. PLEASE CLARIFY WHAT THE BOX IS | | | NEXT TO THESE ELEMENTS, IS THIS A TRANSFORMER? FDC | | | SHALL BE WALL MOUNTED IF ALLOWED BY FD. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | | | | 19. DDCV SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN MINIMUM SETBACK. | | | RELOCATE WATER METER AND DDCA TO THE WEST SIDE OF THE | | | BUILDING. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | | | | ADDITIONAL | | | A. PROPOSED VALET STACKING DOES NOT WORK WITH THE | | | 90-DEGREE PARKING CONFIGURATION, THE PROPOSED SPACE FOR | | | PARKING ALONG DATURA MAY BE ALLOCATED OR CONVERTED INTO | | | A GROUND FLOOR ACTIVE USE. THUS ELIMINATING OR REDUCING | | | THE VARIANCE REQUIRED FOR ACTIVE USES ALONG DATURA | | | STREET. | | | [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] PROVIDE A PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION | | | BETWEEN VALET AREA AND DATURA. | | | | | | B. PLEASE INCLUDE A HARDSCAPE PLAN THAT INCLUDES ALL | | | ELEMENTS ALONG THE STREETSCAPE. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | | | | C. PLEASE INCLUDE EXHIBIT WITH EXISTING ON STREET | | | PARKING SPACE AND PROPOSED SPACES. IF EXISTING | | | ON-STREET PARKING IS REMOVED, A REMOVAL FEE WILL BE | | | ASSESSED. | | | [SATISFIED] RESPONSE ACKNOWLEDGES REMOVAL FEE FOR THE 4 | | | REMOVED SPACES. | | | | | | D. PLEASE INCLUDE THE CURB AND BUILDING ON THE SOUTH | | | SIDE OF THE ALLEY AND WEST SIDE OF PROJECT, WITHIN BOTH | | | THE SITE PLAN AND GROUND FLOOR PLAN. | | | [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] ADJUST THE CONNECTION SOUTH. | | | REMOVE PORTION OF LANDSCAPE SOUTH OF THE BIKE RACKS TO | | | ALLOW A WIDER SIDEWALK CONNECTION. KEEP THE PORTION OF | | | LANDSCAPE EAST OF THE PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | E. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE CHANGES TO THE CURB WEST OF THE | | | BUILDING ON DATURA STREET. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | | | | F. PROPOSED ON STREET PARKING CAN BE REDUCED TO 20 FT. | | | LONG (ALONG QUADRILLE PLAZA DRIVE) | | | [SATISFIED] CHANGED TO DROP-OFF LANE | | | | | | G. PLEASE CLEARLY INDICATE CHANGES ON THE CURB LOCATION | | | ON QUADRILLE PLAZA DRIVE, PLEASE SHOW THE EAST SIDE OF | | | THE ROAD ON THE CIVIL DRAWINGS AND SITE PLAN. THE SAME | | | FOR DATURA STREET. | | | [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] | | | | | | H. PLEASE ALSO PROVIDE SECTION FOR QUADRILLE PLAZA | | | DRIVE FRONTAGE AS IS ILLUSTRATED IN CP100 OR CP101. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | | | | I. PLEASE INCLUDE DETAILS OF THE GARAGE SCREENING THAT | | | IS PROPOSED, BEYOND THE MATERIAL PICTURE ON ELEVATION | | | SHEETS. | | | [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] MESH FABRIC SHALL BE RECESSED | | | FROM THE WINDOW FRAMES, TO MAKE THE FRAME VISIBLE FROM | | | THE OUTSIDE. FRAME SHALL FOLLOW THE PATTERN OF THE REAL | | | WINDOWS. | | | | | | J. ON ELEVATIONS PLEASE PROVIDE PROJECTION OF PROPERTY | | | LINES AND MINIMUM SETBACK LINES TO DETERMINE | | | ENCROACHMENTS OR AERIAL EASEMENTS. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | | | | K. RECOMMEND SEPARATE MEETING WITH STAFF TO DISCUSS | | | LANDSCAPE CHANGES AND ACTIVE LINER USE/GROUND FLOOR USE | | | ALONG DATURA ST. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | | | | L. FOR DAC SUBMITTAL PLEASE PROVIDE COLOR ELEVATIONS | | | INSERTED INTO CONTEXT AND RENDERINGS OF THE PROPOSED | | | PROJECT FROM QUADRILLE AND DATURA. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | | | | COMMENTS FROM 11/19/21 3RD SUBMITTAL: | | | 1. PLEASE REMOVE TREES SHOWN ON SOUTH ELEVATION ALONG | | | THE ALLEY. | | | 2. EXPLAIN THE ADDITION FOR A SIDEWALK ALONG THE ALLEY. | | | 3. SHOWER FACILITY FOR BIKEROOM SHALL INCLUDE A TOILET | | | AND VANITY. | | | 4. PLEASE INDICATE THE RESTAURANT/COMMERCIAL SF, HOTEL | | | MEETING ROOMS. | | | 5. REFINE THE PATTERN OF THE HORIZONTAL BANDS OF THE | | | FACADE/BALCONIES TO CONSISTENTLY READ AS AN UNDULATING | | | BAND (REDUCE OR ELIMINATE HARD EDGES, BREAKS, AND | | | LINES). | | | | | | PLEASE RESUBMIT AS 1 PRINTED COLOR COPY, 1 DIGITAL | | | COPY, AND A RESPONSE SHEET. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-17-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ckimmerl |
Date |
09-17-2021 |
Time |
14:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ckimmerl |
Date |
09-17-2021 |
Time |
14:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-09-17 14:33:39 | SUBMISSION #1 COMMENTS | | | | | | SETBACKS | | | 1. [SATISFIED] BOTH DATURA STREET AND QUADRILLE PLAZA | | | DRIVE ARE BOTH CLASSIFIED AS PRIMARY PEDESTRIAN | | | STREETS, PLEASE NOTE/MAKE ADJUSTMENTS AS NECESSARY | | | (PROPOSED PLANS SHOW AS SECONDARY & AVENUE). | | | 2. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SETBACK IS MEASURED FROM THE | | | PROMINENT CURB-LINE LOCATION (+50% OF FRONTAGE) | | | LANDSCAPE PLANS INCORRECTLY LABEL THE BACK OF CURB | | | ALONG DATURA STREET, SITE PLAN SHOWS BACK OF CURB | | | COINCIDING WITH THE ON STREET PARKING SPACE. | | | | | | OPEN SPACE | | | 3. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON | | | PRIVATE OPEN SPACE (SEC. 94-109 TABLE IV-7), SPECIFYING | | | THE AMOUNT, LOCATION, AND TYPE OF SPACE. CONFIRM | | | COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS LOCATED IN TABLE FOR EACH | | | TYPE OF SPACE. | | | PROJECT COMPLIES WITH THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE | | | REQUIREMENTS WITH THE 7TH FLOOR TERRACE AND ROOFTOP | | | GARDEN ON THE 19TH FLOOR. PLEASE REMOVE THE GROUND | | | FLOOR PRIVATE OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM AND CALCULATIONS, AS | | | THE GROUND FLOOR AREAS SHOWN WOULD NOT MEET THE CODE | | | REQUIREMENTS OR CONSTITUTE AS A PRIVATE/PUBLIC OPEN | | | SPACE. | | | | | | ACTIVE USE | | | 4. [NOT SATISFIED] PROPOSED PROJECT IS NOT IN | | | COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM GROUND ACTIVE USES (65%) ALONG | | | PRIMARY PEDESTRIAN STREETS (DATURA). SEE TABLE IV-42 | | | BUILDING REQUIREMENTS QBD 10-25. | | | VARIANCE IS BEING SOUGHT TO REDUCE ACTIVE USE | | | REQUIREMENT FROM 65% TO 30%, WARRANTS ADDITIONAL | | | DISCUSSION W/ STAFF. | | | 5. [NOT SATISFIED] PROPOSED PROJECT IS NOT IN | | | COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM LINER ACTIVE USES [2 TO 5 | | | STORIES (80?)] WHICH REQUIRES 60% ALONG PRIMARY | | | PEDESTRIAN STREETS (DATURA). | | | VARIANCE IS BEING SOUGHT TO REDUCE ACTIVE USE LINER | | | REQUIREMENT FROM FLOORS 2 TO 5, FROM 60% TO X%, | | | WARRANTS ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION W/ STAFF. | | | | | | STREETSCAPE | | | 6. [NOT SATISFIED] PLEASE PROVIDE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN FOR | | | THE SITE. PHOTOMETRIC PLAN IS PROVIDED, HOWEVER PROJECT | | | SITE PHOTOMETRICS ARE NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CODE. | | | REQUIRED MINIMUM OF 0.6 FOOT CANDLES AS MEASURED AT THE | | | BACK EDGE OF THE CURB AND ONE FOOT ABOVE THE SIDEWALK. | | | A)[PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SPECIFY THE LIGHT FIXTURE | | | SPECS. MAKE SURE PROPOSED FIXTURES ARE IN COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE CITY STANDARDS. | | | CITY/DMP LIGHTNING SPECS REQUIRE 13 FT. POLES WITH BOTH | | | THE POLES AND LIGHT FIXTURES BEING BLACK IN COLOR. | | | ADHERE TO DOWNTOWN STANDARD ALONG DATURA. DECORATIVE | | | FIXTURES ALONG QUADRILLE PLAZA SHALL MATCH EXISTING | | | FIXTURES INSTALLED IN FRONT OF STATION. | | | | | | 7. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE LANDSCAPE PLAN WITH STREET | | | TREES ALONG QUADRILLE PLAZA DRIVE AND DATURA STREET, | | | NEXT TO CURB. (SEC. 94-113) | | | STREET TREES SHALL BE PLANTED AND SPACED EVERY 30 FT. | | | ALONG ENTIRE FRONTAGE. TREE PLACEMENT SHALL BE AS CLOSE | | | TO THE CURB AS POSSIBLE. RECOMMEND SEPARATE MEETING | | | WITH STAFF TO DISCUSS LANDSCAPE/STREETSCAPE CHANGES | | | ALONG QUADRILLE PLAZA DR. AND DATURA ST. | | | 8. [SATISFIED] GREASE TRAP NOT PERMITTED ON SIDEWALK. | | | | | | BIKES, PARKING, & LOADING | | | 9. AS PER ARTICLE IV: SEC. 94-111, BICYCLE PARKING MUST | | | INCLUDE: | | | A) [SATISFIED] (I) SECURE BIKE RACKS AND/OR STORAGE AT | | | A RATIO OF ONE BICYCLE PARKING SPACE PER EVERY 15 | | | PARKING SPACES PROVIDED | | | B) [SATISFIED] FOR HOTEL (II) A MINIMUM OF ONE SHOWER | | | AND CHANGING FACILITY SHALL BE PROVIDED TO BE AVAILABLE | | | FOR ALL TENANTS AND SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE | | | BUILDING, OR WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE, | | | FOR DEVELOPMENTS GREATER THAN 50,000 SQUARE FEET IN | | | GROSS BUILDING AREA. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF | | | SHOWER FACILITIES. | | | C) [NOT SATISFIED] ADDITIONALLY, 1 SPACE PER 100 FT. OF | | | STREET FRONTAGE; TO BE LOCATED ALONG ROW OR STREET | | | FRONTAGES FOR PUBLIC ACCESS. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE 4 ADDITIONAL BIKE RACKS WITHIN THE | | | PUBLIC ROW. PLEASE INCLUDE A HARDSCAPE PLAN INCLUDING | | | ALL ELEMENTS ALONG THE STREETSCAPE. | | | D) [SATISFIED] PLEASE SEPARATE HOTEL/COMMERCIAL USE | | | BIKE PARKING FROM THE RESIDENTIAL USE BIKE PARKING | | | 10. PLEASE INCLUDE TABLE OF PARKING REQUIREMENTS | | | A) [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] EXPLAIN IF PARKING IS COMBINED | | | BETWEEN USES OR IF USE WILL HAVE SEGREGATED SPACES. | | | PLEASE INDICATE IF THE PARKING FOR RESIDENTIAL AND | | | HOTEL USES ARE COMMON POOL OR IF THEY ARE RESERVED | | | SPACES. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE LABEL THE SPACES FOR BOTH | | | COMMERCIAL AND GUEST PARKING. | | | B)[PARTIALLY SATISFIED] # OF SPACES REQUIRED PER USE & | | | # OF SPACES PROVIDED | | | SEE ABOVE COMMENT. | | | C) [SATISFIED] PARKING DETAIL/STRIPING IS NOT TO THE | | | CITY STANDARDS, PLEASE UPDATE. | | | 11. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SPECIFY AUTOTURN AND SERVICE | | | ACCESS/LOADING FOR THE SITE. | | | PLEASE INCLUDE WITHIN SITE PLAN, GROUND FLOOR PLAN, OR | | | SEPARATE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN. | | | | | | | | | FACADE ARTICULATION | | | 12. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] ARTIFICIAL GREENERY/MATERIALS | | | OR ELEMENTS ARE NOT PERMITTED ON THE FACADE/VISIBLE | | | FROM THE ROW. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DETAILS OF THE PROPOSED | | | VERTICAL VEGETATION SYSTEM. | | | 13. [SATISFIED] PLANAR BREAKS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH | | | CODE. SEC. 94-109 TABLE IV-4 | | | A) [SATISFIED] PLANAR BREAKS B AND D (17% OF FRONTAGE | | | COMBINED) DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM STANDARD OF 20% OF | | | BUILDING FRONTAGE. | | | | | | GENERAL SITE | | | 14. PROVIDE SITE TABLE WITH: | | | A) [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SITE AREA | | | PLEASE ADDRESS THE DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE GROSS | | | BUILDING AREA (GBA) AND FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) VALUES | | | BETWEEN SHEETS A-0.03 (231,228 SF) AND A-0.04 (232,370 | | | SF), THE OVERALL AREA VALUE SHALL BE THE SAME. | | | B) [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] GROSS BUILDING AREA ALLOWED | | | SEE ABOVE COMMENT. | | | C) [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] GROSS BUILDING AREA PROPOSED | | | GROUND FLOOR GBA CALCULATION AND DIAGRAMS SHALL INCLUDE | | | THE VALET ROOM, AND ASSOCIATED BIKE ROOM | | | SHOWER/BATHROOM AREA. | | | D) [SATISFIED] TDRS NEEDED FOR PROJECT. | | | DAC APPROVAL WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE ISSUANCE OF | | | BUILDING PERMIT. | | | 15. [SATISFIED] PLEASE CONFIRM THAT GROSS BUILDING AREA | | | CALCULATIONS ARE MEASURED FROM THE EXTERIOR WALL. | | | 16. [SATISFIED] CHANGES ON THE FACADE ELEVATIONS ALONG | | | THE 2ND FLOOR DOES NOT SEEM TO REFLECT THE FLOOR PLANS. | | | 17. [SATISFIED] INDICATE ALLEYWAY IS ONE-WAY GOING | | | EAST. | | | 18. [NOT SATISFIED] FDC SHALL BE WALL MOUNTED. | | | FDC NOT SHOWN AS WALL MOUNTED ON SHEET A-2.01, | | | ADDITIONALLY LP-1.01 IS NOT UPDATED AND SHOWS FDC AND | | | DDAC ON FRONTAGE BEHIND LANDSCAPE SCREENING. PLEASE | | | CLARIFY WHAT THE BOX IS NEXT TO THESE ELEMENTS, IS THIS | | | A TRANSFORMER? FDC SHALL BE WALL MOUNTED IF ALLOWED BY | | | FD. | | | 19. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] DDCV SHALL NOT BE LOCATED | | | WITHIN MINIMUM SETBACK. | | | RELOCATE WATER METER AND DDCA TO THE WEST SIDE OF THE | | | BUILDING. | | | 20. [SATISFIED] CONFIRM THE AMOUNT OF OPENINGS IN | | | GARAGE WEST ELEVATION COMPLIES WITH FIRE CODE. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS BASED ON RESUBMITTED DRAWINGS AND | | | DOCUMENTS 9/17/21: | | | | | | 1. PROPOSED VALET STACKING DOES NOT WORK WITH THE | | | 90-DEGREE PARKING CONFIGURATION, THE PROPOSED SPACE FOR | | | PARKING ALONG DATURA MAY BE ALLOCATED OR CONVERTED INTO | | | A GROUND FLOOR ACTIVE USE. THUS ELIMINATING OR REDUCING | | | THE VARIANCE REQUIRED FOR ACTIVE USES ALONG DATURA | | | STREET. | | | | | | 2. PLEASE INCLUDE A HARDSCAPE PLAN THAT INCLUDES ALL | | | ELEMENTS ALONG THE STREETSCAPE. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE INCLUDE EXHIBIT WITH EXISTING ON STREET | | | PARKING SPACE AND PROPOSED SPACES. IF EXISTING | | | ON-STREET PARKING IS REMOVED, A REMOVAL FEE WILL BE | | | ASSESSED. | | | | | | 4. PLEASE INCLUDE THE CURB AND BUILDING ON THE SOUTH | | | SIDE OF THE ALLEY AND WEST SIDE OF PROJECT, WITHIN BOTH | | | THE SITE PLAN AND GROUND FLOOR PLAN. | | | | | | 5. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE CHANGES TO THE CURB WEST OF THE | | | BUILDING ON DATURA STREET. | | | | | | 6. PROPOSED ON STREET PARKING CAN BE REDUCED TO 20 FT. | | | LONG (ALONG QUADRILLE PLAZA DRIVE) | | | | | | 7. PLEASE CLEARLY INDICATE CHANGES ON THE CURB LOCATION | | | ON QUADRILLE PLAZA DRIVE, PLEASE SHOW THE EAST SIDE OF | | | THE ROAD ON THE CIVIL DRAWINGS AND SITE PLAN. THE SAME | | | FOR DATURA STREET. | | | | | | 8. PLEASE ALSO PROVIDE SECTION FOR QUADRILLE PLAZA | | | DRIVE FRONTAGE AS IS ILLUSTRATED IN CP100 OR CP101. | | | | | | 9. PLEASE INCLUDE DETAILS OF THE GARAGE SCREENING THAT | | | IS PROPOSED, BEYOND THE MATERIAL PICTURE ON ELEVATION | | | SHEETS. | | | | | | 10. ON ELEVATIONS PLEASE PROVIDE PROJECTION OF PROPERTY | | | LINES AND MINIMUM SETBACK LINES TO DETERMINE | | | ENCROACHMENTS OR AERIAL EASEMENTS. | | | | | | 11. RECOMMEND SEPARATE MEETING WITH STAFF TO DISCUSS | | | LANDSCAPE CHANGES AND ACTIVE LINER USE/GROUND FLOOR USE | | | ALONG DATURA ST. | | | | | | 12. FOR DAC SUBMITTAL PLEASE PROVIDE COLOR ELEVATIONS | | | INSERTED INTO CONTEXT AND RENDERINGS OF THE PROPOSED | | | PROJECT FROM QUADRILLE AND DATURA. | | | | | | 13. RESUBMIT FOR DAC ON THE 24TH FOR THE NOVEMBER | | | MEETING. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-12-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ckimmerl |
Date |
08-12-2021 |
Time |
10:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ckimmerl |
Date |
08-12-2021 |
Time |
10:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-08-12 10:37:05 | SETBACKS | | | 1. BOTH DATURA STREET AND QUADRILLE PLAZA DRIVE ARE | | | BOTH CLASSIFIED AS PRIMARY PEDESTRIAN STREETS, PLEASE | | | NOTE/MAKE ADJUSTMENTS AS NECESSARY (PROPOSED PLANS SHOW | | | AS SECONDARY & AVENUE). | | | 2. SETBACK IS MEASURED FROM THE PROMINENT CURB-LINE | | | LOCATION (+50% OF FRONTAGE) | | | | | | OPEN SPACE | | | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON PRIVATE OPEN SPACE | | | (SEC. 94-109 TABLE IV-7), SPECIFYING THE AMOUNT, | | | LOCATION, AND TYPE OF SPACE. CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH | | | STANDARDS LOCATED IN TABLE FOR EACH TYPE OF SPACE. | | | | | | ACTIVE USE | | | 4. PROPOSED PROJECT IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM | | | GROUND ACTIVE USES (65%) ALONG PRIMARY PEDESTRIAN | | | STREETS (DATURA). SEE TABLE IV-42 BUILDING REQUIREMENTS | | | ? QBD 10-25 | | | 5. PROPOSED PROJECT IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM | | | LINER ACTIVE USES [2 TO 5 STORIES (80?)] WHICH REQUIRES | | | 60% ALONG PRIMARY PEDESTRIAN STREETS (DATURA). | | | | | | STREETSCAPE | | | 6. PLEASE PROVIDE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN FOR THE SITE | | | A) SPECIFY THE LIGHT FIXTURE SPECS. MAKE SURE PROPOSED | | | FIXTURES ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY STANDARDS | | | 7. PROVIDE LANDSCAPE PLAN WITH STREET TREES ALONG | | | QUADRILLE PLAZA DRIVE AND DATURA STREET, NEXT TO CURB. | | | (SEC. 94-113) | | | 8. GREASE TRAP NOT PERMITTED ON SIDEWALK. | | | | | | BIKES, PARKING, & LOADING | | | 9. AS PER ARTICLE IV: SEC. 94-111, BICYCLE PARKING MUST | | | INCLUDE: | | | A) (I) SECURE BIKE RACKS AND/OR STORAGE AT A RATIO OF | | | ONE BICYCLE PARKING SPACE PER EVERY 15 PARKING SPACES | | | PROVIDED | | | B) FOR HOTEL (II) A MINIMUM OF ONE SHOWER AND CHANGING | | | FACILITY SHALL BE PROVIDED TO BE AVAILABLE FOR ALL | | | TENANTS AND SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE BUILDING, OR | | | WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE, FOR | | | DEVELOPMENTS GREATER THAN 50,000 SQUARE FEET IN GROSS | | | BUILDING AREA. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF SHOWER | | | FACILITIES | | | C) ADDITIONALLY, 1 SPACE PER 100 FT. OF STREET | | | FRONTAGE; TO BE LOCATED ALONG ROW OR STREET FRONTAGES | | | FOR PUBLIC ACCESS. | | | D) PLEASE SEPARATE HOTEL/COMMERCIAL USE BIKE PARKING | | | FROM THE RESIDENTIAL USE BIKE PARKING | | | 10. PLEASE INCLUDE TABLE OF PARKING REQUIREMENTS | | | A) EXPLAIN IF PARKING IS COMBINED BETWEEN USES OR IF | | | USE WILL HAVE SEGREGATED SPACES. | | | B) # OF SPACES REQUIRED PER USE & # OF SPACES PROVIDED | | | C) PARKING DETAIL/STRIPING IS NOT TO THE CITY | | | STANDARDS, PLEASE UPDATE. | | | 11. SPECIFY AUTOTURN AND SERVICE ACCESS/LOADING FOR THE | | | SITE. | | | | | | FACADE ARTICULATION | | | 12. ARTIFICIAL GREENERY/MATERIALS OR ELEMENTS ARE NOT | | | PERMITTED ON THE FA?ADE/VISIBLE FROM THE ROW. | | | 13. PLANAR BREAKS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CODE. SEC. | | | 94-109 TABLE IV-4 | | | A) PLANAR BREAKS B AND D (17% OF FRONTAGE COMBINED) | | | DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM STANDARD OF 20% OF BUILDING | | | FRONTAGE. | | | | | | GENERAL SITE | | | 14. PROVIDE SITE TABLE WITH: | | | A) SITE AREA | | | B) GROSS BUILDING AREA ALLOWED | | | C) GROSS BUILDING AREA PROPOSED | | | D) TDRS NEEDED FOR PROJECT | | | 15. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT GROSS BUILDING AREA | | | CALCULATIONS ARE MEASURED FROM THE EXTERIOR WALL. | | | 16. CHANGES ON THE FA?ADE ELEVATIONS ALONG THE 2ND | | | FLOOR DOES NOT SEEM TO REFLECT THE FLOOR PLANS. | | | 17. INDICATE ALLEYWAY IS ONE-WAY GOING EAST. | | | 18. FDC SHALL BE WALL MOUNTED. | | | 19. DDCV SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN MINIMUM SETBACK. | | | 20. CONFIRM THE AMOUNT OF OPENINGS IN GARAGE WEST | | | ELEVATION COMPLIES WITH FIRE CODE. | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |