City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Details - Project Z21070014

Plan Review Stops For Project Z21070014

Review Stop	B		BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	1	Status	Date	08-11-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	rbrown		Date	08-11-2021	Time	20:13	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rbrown		Date	08-11-2021	Time	20:13	Sent To

Notes

2021-08-11 20:14:12

NO COMMENTS ON THE DESCRIBED AMENDMENTS.

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	10-13-2021		Cont ID
Sent By	rrossano			Date	10-13-2021	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rrossano			Date	10-13-2021	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	08-05-2021		Cont ID
Sent By	rrossano			Date	08-05-2021	Time	Rev Time
Received By	rrossano			Date	08-05-2021	Time	Sent To

Notes

2021-08-10 07:13:52	RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES
	DEPT., 561-494-1098 [email protected] :

	PLEASE CHANGE PROPOSED 3 IN. POLY WATER SERVICE TO 4
	IN. DIP (ON ACACIA FOR 1101 S. FLAGLER DR.).

	MARK HURLEY, CITY OF WPB PUB. UTIL. FIELD CUSTOMER SVC.
	SUPV., [email protected]. 561-822-2262:

	-UTILITY PLAN SHOWS REPLACEMENT OF WATER SERVICE FOR
	1101 S. FLAGLER DR. IN ACACIA ROAD. THAT WATER SERVICE
	MAY NOT EXIST CURRENTLY, BUT IF IT DOES 3 INCH POLY
	SHOULD NOT BE USED. WOULD NEED TO BE DIP.

	-PALM BEACH ATLANTIC COLLEGE HAS A METERED IRRIGATION
	WATER SERVICE NEAR THE PROPOSED 4 INCH METER. PRIOR
	NOTIFIED APPLICANT TEAM THAT WOULD NEED TO LEAVE IN
	TACT OR GET APPROVAL FROM COLLEGE FOR REMOVAL. PLEASE
	PROVIDE STATUS/OUTCOME.

	-PLEASE CHECK THE INV OF ALL SAN MH ON CURRIE CRESCENT
	TO MAKE SURE GRAVITY WILL GO TO ACACIA ROAD.

	-CIVIL PLANS SHOW GUY WIRE IN SIDEWALK NEAR SOUTH
	DRIVEWAY. IS THAT AS INTENDED?

	-LABEL SERVICE PIPE OF 1.5 INCH IRRIGATION METER FOR
	ACACIA WITH PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL TYPE.

	-AREA SOUTHEAST OF PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT HAS SEVERAL
	CROSSINGS WITH WATER PIPE AND UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC.
	PLEASE ADD ALL OF THEM TO THE CROSSING TABLE.

	-WRONG STANDARD DETAIL FOR LARGE VAULT METER IS
	INCLUDED. PLEASE REPLACE WITH WS-4 AND WS-4.1 REVISION
	SEP2019.

	-PIGGING JUMPER ON P-6 DETAIL MUST BE INSTALLED
	ABOVE-GROUND. PROJECT SHOULD BE AWARE AND MAKE SURE NO
	CONFLICTS WITH PLAN.

	-WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE CONVERGING TEE IMMEDIATELY
	DOWNSTREAM OF THE FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES?

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	3	Status	P	Date	12-13-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	12-13-2021	Time	16:33	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	12-13-2021	Time	16:33	Sent To

Notes

2021-12-13 16:37:09	FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	561-822-1462
	PROJECT: 1309 S FLAGLER RPD MINOR Z21070014
	DECEMBER 13, 2021
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

	NOTE THAT THE LANDSCAPE PLANS APPROVED WITH THE RPD
	ESTABLISH THE MINIMUM SITE REQUIREMENTS. THE NUMBER OF
	REQUIRED TREES IS WHAT IS SHOWN ON THOSE PLANS. ANY
	REDUCTION WOULD REQUIRE A MAJOR AMENDMENT.

	1. SATISFIED. BUFFER TREES FOR THE NORTH BUFFER WAS
	REDUCED BY ONE GUMBO LIMBO THAT FALLS BELOW THE
	APPROVED NUMBER OF TREES THAT WAS APPROVED FOR THE
	BUFFER LENGTH. ADD ONE SHADE TREE BACK TO THE BUFFER.

	2. SATISFIED. THE TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES PROPOSED WITH
	THIS PETITION IS 79. THE TOTAL NUMBER APPROVED IS 86. A
	MINIMUM OF 86 TREES MUST BE PROVIDED.

	PLEASE REFER TO THE APPROVED PLANS FROM THE PD FOR THE
	TREE AND FLOWERING TREE TOTALS. THEY ARE STILL SHORT 2
	TREES.


	LANDSCAPE PLAN
	+6 THATCH PALMS AT 3:1 EQUALS 2 TREES.
	-4 REDUCTION OF 4 SHADE TREES,
	+1 ADDITION OF ONE FLOWERING TREE,
	TOTAL REDUCTION OF ONE TREE.

	AMENITY DECK
	+4 INCREASE OF 4 GS
	-1 REDUCTION OF ONE TRIPLE VEITCHII
	+1 ADDITION OF 7 THRINAX @ 3:1 EQUALS ONE TREE
	INCREASE OF 4 TREES.

	NET INCREASE OF 3 TREES.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	09-24-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	09-24-2021	Time	16:30	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	09-24-2021	Time	16:30	Sent To

Notes

2021-09-24 16:30:30	FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	561-822-1462
	PROJECT: 1309 S FLAGLER RPD MINOR Z21070014
	SEPTEMBER 23, 2021
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

	NOTE THAT THE LANDSCAPE PLANS APPROVED WITH THE RPD
	ESTABLISH THE MINIMUM SITE REQUIREMENTS. THE NUMBER OF
	REQUIRED TREES IS WHAT IS SHOWN ON THOSE PLANS. ANY
	REDUCTION WOULD REQUIRE A MAJOR AMENDMENT.

	1. SATISFIED. BUFFER TREES FOR THE NORTH BUFFER WAS
	REDUCED BY ONE GUMBO LIMBO THAT FALLS BELOW THE
	APPROVED NUMBER OF TREES THAT WAS APPROVED FOR THE
	BUFFER LENGTH. ADD ONE SHADE TREE BACK TO THE BUFFER.

	2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES
	PROPOSED WITH THIS PETITION IS 79. THE TOTAL NUMBER
	APPROVED IS 86. A MINIMUM OF 86 TREES MUST BE PROVIDED.

	PLEASE REFER TO THE APPROVED PLANS FROM THE PD FOR THE
	TREE AND FLOWERING TREE TOTALS. THEY ARE STILL SHORT 2
	TREES.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	08-10-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	08-10-2021	Time	10:49	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	08-10-2021	Time	10:49	Sent To

Notes

2021-08-10 10:53:59	FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	561-822-1462
	PROJECT: 1309 S FLAGLER RPD MINOR Z21070014
	AUGUST 9, 2021
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

	NOTE THAT THE LANDSCAPE PLANS APPROVED WITH THE RPD
	ESTABLISH THE MINIMUM SITE REQUIREMENTS. THE NUMBER OF
	REQUIRED TREES IS WHAT IS SHOWN ON THOSE PLANS. ANY
	REDUCTION WOULD REQUIRE A MAJOR AMENDMENT.

	1. BUFFER TREES FOR THE NORTH BUFFER WAS REDUCED BY ONE
	GUMBO LIMBO THAT FALLS BELOW THE APPROVED NUMBER OF
	TREES THAT WAS APPROVED FOR THE BUFFER LENGTH. ADD ONE
	SHADE TREE BACK TO THE BUFFER.

	2. THE TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES PROPOSED WITH THIS
	PETITION IS 79. THE TOTAL NUMBER APPROVED IS 86. A
	MINIMUM OF 86 TREES MUST BE PROVIDED.

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	08-02-2021		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	08-02-2021	Time	Rev Time
Received By				Date	08-02-2021	Time	Sent To

Notes

2021-08-02 13:01:39	NO COMMENTS FROM PUBLIC WORKS

	MATT HEJAZI
	DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
	[email protected]

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	08-12-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	tward			Date	08-12-2021	Time	08:56	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tward			Date	08-12-2021	Time	09:12	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	09-24-2021		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	09-24-2021	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date		Time	Sent To

Notes

2021-09-24 18:12:05	PASSED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION: IN THE CASE
	LOADING DOCK OPERATIONS ARE CAUSING MAJOR DISRUPTION OR
	CONGESTION TO TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ON CURRIE CRESCENT
	DURING PEAK-HOUR TIMES (7-9 AM, 4-6 PM). ACCESS AND USE
	OF THE LOADING AREA SHALL BE FORBIDDEN DURING SUCH
	TIMES.

	TRAFFIC COMMENTS
	1) SATISFIED. PER THE DELIVERY MANAGEMENT PLAN:
	A. PLEASE PROOF-READ AND RE-SUBMIT THE DOCUMENT
	B. PROVIDE DELIVERY DAYS AND TIMES. IF NO RESTRICTIONS
	ARE CONTEMPLATED, A MEETING WITH THE CITY SHALL BE
	SCHEDULED TO DISCUSS THEM

	NOTE: THE PLANNED FLAGLER TOWERS PROJECT, JUST SOUTH OF
	THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, WILL BE USING CURRIE CRESCENT
	FOR SERVICE/DELIVERY VEHICLES MANEUVERING AS WELL.
	THUS, FURTHER SCRUTINY ON THE MATTER IS REQUIRED.

	VALERIO ORICCHIO
	CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
	561-494-1092
	[email protected]

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	08-12-2021		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	08-12-2021	Time	Rev Time
Received By				Date		Time	Sent To

Notes

2021-08-12 12:17:43	TRAFFIC COMMENTS
	1) PER THE DELIVERY MANAGEMENT PLAN:
	A. PLEASE PROOF-READ AND RE-SUBMIT THE DOCUMENT
	B. PROVIDE DELIVERY DAYS AND TIMES. IF NO RESTRICTIONS
	ARE CONTEMPLATED, A MEETING WITH THE CITY SHALL BE
	SCHEDULED TO DISCUSS THEM

	NOTE: THE PLANNED FLAGLER TOWERS PROJECT, JUST SOUTH OF
	THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, WILL BE USING CURRIE CRESCENT
	FOR SERVICE/DELIVERY VEHICLES MANEUVERING AS WELL.
	THUS, FURTHER SCRUTINY ON THE MATTER IS REQUIRED.

	VALERIO ORICCHIO
	CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
	561-494-1092
	[email protected]

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	3	Status	P	Date	01-19-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	01-19-2022	Time	17:50	Rev Time	0.75
Received By	eschneid			Date	01-19-2022	Time	16:14	Sent To

Notes

2022-01-19 17:50:40	PASSED

	CONDITION: ANYTHING MORE THAN BATHROOMS (MAY INCLUDE A
	SHOWER) ON THE ROOFTOP ARE CONSIDERED AMENITIES,
	REGARDLESS IF THEY ARE ONLY FOR THE PENTHOUSE UNITS,
	AND ARE THUS NOT PERMITTED TO EXCEED THE HEIGHT
	ALLOWANCE.

	CONDITION: DUE TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE NEW COLUMN THAT
	RESTRICTS THE WIDTH OF THE DRIVE AISLE TO 13 FEET,
	TANDEM VALET SPACES B2-04/05 THROUGH B2-12/13 MUST
	ALWAYS REMAIN VALET ONLY (THIS MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE
	CONDOMINIUM DOCUMENTS) AND MAY NOT BE UTILIZED FOR
	SELF-PARKING.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	10-15-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	10-15-2021	Time	12:12	Rev Time	3.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	10-13-2021	Time	09:57	Sent To

Notes

2021-10-15 12:00:05	PB 1799B - REVIEW OF SEPTAMBER RESUBMITTAL
	1309 S. FLAGLER RPD BUILDING PERMIT BASED MINOR
	AMENDMENT
	1309 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE

	- CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,
	[email protected]

	- PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	- WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TWO
	(2) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
	OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
	RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
	TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
	COMMENTS.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
	RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THESE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
	FROM THE DATE OF ISSUE (BY DECEMBER 15, 2021), THE
	PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT THAT THE
	CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL
	REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
	ADDITIONAL RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF
	PREVIOUSLY ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE
	SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED
	A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL
	APPLICATION FEE ($60).

	1) REPEAT COMMENT: THERE ARE INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN
	THE SITE, CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS AS TO THE PLACEMENT
	OF THE SCULPTURE PADS NEAR THE VALET ONLY STAGING
	SPACES. ALL THE PLANS NEED TO SHOW THE SAME CONDITIONS.

	2) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE BICYCLE ROOM DETAIL. IT
	SHOWS 12 RACKS THAT WILL HOLD ONE BICYCLE EACH, NOT THE
	13 LISTED ON THE SITE DATA SHEET. THE 12 SPACES EXCEED
	CODE MINIMUM; HOWEVER, THE SITE DATA SHEET NEEDS TO
	SHOW CORRECT INFORMATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE EMPLOYEE
	RACK HOLDS TWO BICYCLES, SO YOU MAY WISH TO ADD CLARITY
	TO THE TABLE.

	3) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE SETBACK FROM THE BASE OF
	THE ANGLED AMENITY SUPPORT COLUMNS TO THE NORTH AND
	SOUTH PROPERTY LINES. HOWEVER, SINCE THE COLUMNS ANGLE
	TOWARD THE PROPERTY LINE, THE MEASURE NEEDS TO BE
	PROVIDED TO THE PORTION OF THE COLUMN THAT IS CLOSEST
	TO THE PROPERTY LINE. STAFF SCALED THE PLANS AND IT
	APPEARS THAT THE REQUIRES SETBACK DIMENSION IS MET;
	HOWEVER, IT MUST BE SHOWN.

	4) THE ELEVATION OR SECTION DRAWINGS MUST SHOW A
	DIMENSION TAG TO THE ROOF DECK THAT IS BASED ON THE
	MEAN AVERAGE EXISTING GRADE THAT VERIFIES THAT THE
	BUILDING HEIGHT IS NO TALLER THAN 300 FEET.

	5) THE ROOF PLAN SHOWS SAUNAS IN THE BATHROOMS. THIS IS
	NOT PERMITTED. STAFF PERMITS REQUIRED BATHROOMS ONLY AS
	ENCLOSED SPACE FOR ROOFTOP POOLS WHICH EXCEED THE
	BUILDING HEIGHT. THE SAUNA IS AN AMENITY AND THUS MUST
	STAY BELOW THE 300-FOOT BUILDING HEIGHT ALLOWANCE.
	NOTE: THE ORIGINAL ROOF PLAN JUST SHOWED ONE BATHROOM
	WITH A SHOWER. WHY ARE THERE NOW TWO BATHROOMS SHOWN?

	6) THE NUBMER OF SPACES ON SHEET G0.01 FOR THE BASEMENT
	1 PARKING LINE IS INCORRECT. THERE ARE 31 PARKING
	SPACES. PLEASE CORRECT THE PLAN.

	CONDITION: DUE TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE NEW COLUMN THAT
	RESTRICTS THE WIDTH OF THE DRIVE AISLE TO 13 FEET,
	TANDEM VALET SPACES B2-04/05 THROUGH B2-12/13 MUST
	ALWAYS REMAIN VALET ONLY (THIS MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE
	CONDOMINIUM DOCUMENTS) AND MAY NOT BE UTILIZED FOR
	SELF-PARKING.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	08-10-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	08-10-2021	Time	11:49	Rev Time	6.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	08-10-2021	Time	11:49	Sent To

Notes

2021-08-10 11:50:08	PB 1799B
	1309 S. FLAGLER RPD BUILDING PERMIT BASED MINOR
	AMENDMENT
	1309 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE

	- CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,
	[email protected]

	- PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	- WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE
	(3) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
	OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
	RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
	TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
	COMMENTS.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
	RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
	FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY OCTOBER 12,
	2021), THE PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT
	THAT THE CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER
	ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
	RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED
	COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
	APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
	WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($60).

	1) THERE ARE INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN THE SITE, CIVIL
	AND LANDSCAPE PLANS AS TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE
	SCULPTURE PADS NEAR THE VALET ONLY STAGING SPACES. ALL
	THE PLANS NEED TO SHOW THE SAME CONDITIONS. NOTE: THE
	SHRUB PLAN SHOWS LANDSCAPE MATERIAL OVER ONE OF THE
	PADS.

	2) THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS (EX. SHEETS A1.01 AND A0.01)
	DO NOT SHOW TWO OF THE EASTERNMOST AMENITY DECK SUPPORT
	COLUMNS THAT ARE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL
	PLANS. ALL THE PLANS NEED TO SHOW THE SAME CONDITIONS.

	3) ALL PARKING SPACES AND DRIVE AISLES NEED TO SHOW
	DIMENSIONS.

	4) THE PARKING LOT STRIPING IS NOT SHOWN MEETING CITY
	CODE. NO PARKING DETAIL IS INCLUDED.

	5) PROVIDE THE SETBACK FROM THE INSIDE CORNER (DENTIST
	LOT CORNER) TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE WALL OF THE UPPER
	PARKING (B1 LEVEL). THIS MAY BE NO CLOSER THAN SEVEN
	(7) FEET.

	6) THE GROUND FLOOR IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A SETBACK OF 70
	FEET TO THE EAST PROPERTY LINE. THE PLANS SHOW A
	SETBACK OF ONLY 66 FEET 11 INCHES, WHICH DOES NOT
	COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED WAIVER.

	7) PROVIDE THE LAYOUT OF NEW BICYCLE ROOM, WITH
	DIMENSIONS.

	8) PROVIDE THE SETBACK FROM THE AMENITY SUPPORT COLUMNS
	TO THE NORTH, SOUTH AND EAST PROPERTY LINES. 49 FEET,
	34 FEET AND 17 FEET, RESPECTIVELY, ARE REQUIRED.

	9) TURN OFF THE INCORRECT BACKGROUND LANDSCAPE LAYER
	THAT IS SHOWN ON THE PODIUM LEVEL PLAN (MULTIPLE
	BUILDING CONFLICTS) OR PROVIDE THE LANDSCAPE IN THE
	CORRECT LOCATIONS.

	10) PROVIDE SETBACK DIMENSIONS FROM THE EDGE OF THE
	AMENITY DECK TO THE EAST PROPERTY LINE AND THE COLUMN
	ON THE AMENITY DECK TO THE EAST PROPERTY LINE. 10 FEET
	AND 50 FEET, RESPECTIVELY, ARE REQUIRED.

	11) THE AMENITY DECK IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A SETBACK OF
	15 FEET 4 INCHES FROM CURRIE CRESCENT. THE PLANS SHOW A
	SETBACK OF ONLY 13 FEET 10 INCHES, WHICH DOES NOT
	COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED WAIVER.

	12) PROVIDE THE NORTH, SOUTH AND EAST SETBACK
	DIMENSIONS FROM THE AMENITY FLOOR BUILDING WALLS TO THE
	PROPERTY LINES (REQUIRED 48 FEET, 33 FEET AND 72 FEET,
	RESPECTIVELY) ON THE AMENITY LEVEL PLANS.

	13) FLOORS 4 - 24 ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE A SETBACK OF 47
	FEET 9 INCHES FROM THE EAST SIDE PROPERTY LINE. THE
	PLANS SHOW A SETBACK OF ONLY 47 FEET 3 INCHES, WHICH
	DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED WAIVER.

	14) PROVIDE AN OVERLAY OF EACH FLOOR TO SHOW THAT THE
	CURVILINEAR PORTIONS OF THE BUILDING ARE NO CLOSER TO
	THE PROPERTY LINES WHERE WAIVERS WERE REQUIRED. NOTE:
	STAFF HAS ALREADY NOTED LOCATIONS WERE THE CLOSEST
	POINT OF THE BUILDING DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED
	SETBACKES, SO THIS REQUIREMENT IS TO VERIFY DEVELOPMENT
	REGULATION NUMBER 17 OF RESOLUTION NO. 13-19 REGARDING
	THE FULL FLOORS.

	15) THE ROOF LEVEL PLAN NEEDS TO INCLUDE THE ELEVATION
	TAGS SO STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE BUILDING HEIGHT HAS
	NOT BEEN EXCEEDED.

	16) PROVIDE VERIFICATION ON HOW THE ARTIFICIAL TURF
	USED FOR THE DOG PARK WILL NOT BE VISIBLE FROM ANY
	PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.

	17) DUE TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE NEW COLUMN THAT
	RESTRICTS THE WIDTH OF THE DRIVE AISLE TO 13 FEET,
	TANDEM VALET SPACES B2-04/05 THROUGH B2-12/13 MUST
	ALWAYS REMAIN VALET ONLY (THIS MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE
	CONDOMINIUM DOCUMENTS) AND MAY NOT BE UTILIZED FOR
	SELF-PARKING.

	18) SPACE B1-28, B1-31, B1-11, B1-12, B1-16, B1-17,
	B2-41, B2-76, B2-74, B2-57, B2-58, B2-55, B2-54, B2-50,
	B2-48, B2-47, B2-45, B2-44 AND B2-29 DO NOT PROVIDE
	MUCH SPACE TO OPEN THE CAR DOOR. THIS IS A LUXURY
	CONDOMINIUM PROJECT WITH TIGHT PARKING SPACES. THE
	STAFF HAS HEARD COMPLAINTS FROM OWNERS IN PREVIOUS
	CONDOMINIUMS THAT THE STANDARD WIDTH STALL, WHEN
	AGAINST A WALL DOES NOT PROVIDE THE ABILITY TO OPEN CAR
	DOORS. YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS INTO ACCOUNT WHEN MARKETING
	THE PARKING SPACES IN RELATION TO THE OWNER'S CAR
	SIZES.