 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z21060007
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z21060007 |
| Review Stop |
AIPP |
ART IN PUBLIC PLACES |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
07-09-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
scwelter |
Date |
07-09-2021 |
Time |
14:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
scwelter |
Date |
07-09-2021 |
Time |
14:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-07-09 14:04:30 | PER DEVELOPER EXISTING ARTWORK ON SITE WILL BE | | | RELOCATED PPRC 7.8.21 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-07-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
07-07-2021 |
Time |
20:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
07-07-2021 |
Time |
20:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-07-07 20:59:30 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. FLOOD ZONE. ACCORDING TO THE ADOPTED FLOOD INSURANCE | | | RATE MAPS (FIRMS), THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS IN FLOOD | | | ZONE AE WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 7 FT NAVD. THE | | | FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL ASSOCIATED | | | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS ETC.) SHALL | | | BE 24 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD | | | ELEVATION. | | | | | | 3. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT, THE | | | PLANS SHALL SHOW AT LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, | | | COMPLYING WITH SECTIONS 206.2 AND 402.2 OF FLORIDA | | | ACCESSIBILITY CODE, FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ALL | | | ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR FACILITY ENTRANCES. | | | | | | 4. ANY PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WITH A SLOPE GREATER | | | THAN 1:20 SHALL BE CONSIDERED A RAMP AND SHALL COMPLY | | | WITH SECTION 405 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE. | | | | | | 5. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, | | | GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND | | | OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS, | | | SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 6. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND | | | CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF | | | CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. | | | | | | 7. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER | | | AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY, | | | INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE | | | CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION | | | THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY. | | | | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-18-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
07-18-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
07-18-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-01-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
04-01-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
04-01-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-04-01 13:05:24 | Z21060007 - 777 S FLAGLER AMEND - RESUB | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS COMMENTS: | | | 2. THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF | | | REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY | | | AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND | | | WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. TO VIEW | | | DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER | | | ENGINEERING RELATED DOCUMENTS, CLICK HERE OR GO TO: HTT | | | PS://WWW.WPB.ORG/GOVERNMENT/ENGINEERING/ENGINEERING-FOR | | | MS-PERMITS-AND-APPLICATIONS . | | | 3. CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, | | | FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08, ADOPTED | | | SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18) CHAPTER 90 | | | UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. SEC. 90-7. | | | POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER SERVICE | | | FACILITIES OF THE CITY: | | | THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE | | | CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY | | | BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS, | | | BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION. | | | 4. AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR | | | MORE INFORMATION, CLICK HERE OR GO TO: HTTPS://WWW.WPB. | | | ORG/GOVERNMENT/ENGINEERING/ENGINEERING-FORMS-PERMITS-AN | | | D-APPLICATIONS . | | | 5. PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY | | | OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC | | | RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF | | | YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE | | | MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL | | | IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT | | | [email protected] OR 561-494-1040 FOR FURTHER | | | ASSISTANCE. | | | 6. PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS | | | OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES, | | | INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND | | | SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, | | | METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE | | | SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING | | | GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, | | | ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL | | | INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER | | | LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE | | | PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN | | | VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. | | | PLEASE SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT | | | MATERIAL. ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL | | | EXISTING AND PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, | | | INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & | | | TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL | | | UTILITY CROSSINGS. | | | 7. CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY | | | ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY | | | ROW. | | | 8. PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE | | | DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB | | | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION). | | | 9. UPDATE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND | | | PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM | | | AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE | | | PER FAC 64E-8 FOR WATER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR SEWER. | | | 10. NEW CONSTRUCTION OF WATER/SEWER SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | LATEST CITY STANDARD DETAILS. PLEASE UPDATE PLANS | | | ACCORDINGLY. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD | | | CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, | | | PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]: | | | | | | -PLEASE CLARIFY PPRC PROJECT. IT IS ENTITLED PHILLIPS | | | POINT, BUT THE CIVIL PLAN COVER SHEET SAYS ESPERANTE | | | STREETSCAPE WITH A LARGER AREA ENCOMPASSING SEVERAL | | | PROPERTIES ON THE PROJECT LOCATION MAP. SEVERAL SHEETS | | | OF CIVIL PLAN SET ALSO MISSING OR OMITTED. IF THIS | | | PROJECT IS JUST FOR 777 S FLAGLER, THEN PLEASE SUBMIT | | | ALL SHEETS SHOWING 777 S FLAGLER PROPERTY. | | | | | | -PGD PLAN ADJACENT LAKEVIEW AVE SHOWS LIGHT POLE IN | | | SIDEWALK THAT IS CALLED OUT FOR REMOVE RELOCATE ON DEMO | | | PLAN. | | | | | | -PGD PLAN SHOWS LIGHT POLE REMAINING IN SIDEWALK JUST | | | WEST OF DRIVEWAY ADJACENT LAKEVIEW AVE THAT IS NOT | | | CALLED OUT ON DEMO PLAN. IS THAT CORRECT OR AS | | | INTENDED? | | | | | | -PLEASE UPDATE TD4 TO CLEARLY SHOW WHAT IS HAPPENING TO | | | THE TREES ADJACENT LAKEVIEW AVE. NO SYMBOL SHOWN FROM | | | DISPOSITION LEGEND. | | | | | | -THERE IS A DOUBLE SIDED STREET SIGN ADJACENT SOUTHWEST | | | CORNER OF BUILDING AND LAKEVIEW AVE. PLANS SHOULD | | | ADDRESS WHAT IS HAPPENING TO IT. IF VIEW BLOCKED BY | | | TREE, THEN CONSIDER ADJUSTING LOCATION IN LANDSCAPING | | | AREA. | | | | | | -THERE IS A STREET SIGN ON NORTH SIDE OF TREE 35. WILL | | | IT BE VIEWABLE TO VEHICLES WITH PROPOSED LIGHT POLE | | | INSTALLED ON LL4? | | | | | | -SHOW FPL MANHOLE IN FRONT OF STAIRWAY ADJACENT | | | LAKEVIEW AVE ON HARDSCAPE PLAN AND MAKE SURE DOES NOT | | | CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED LIGHT POLE ON LL4. | | | | | | -HARDSCAPE PLAN IS SHOWING LIGHT POLE AND STREET SIGN | | | IN PROPOSED SIDEWALK ADJACENT LAKEVIEW, BUT THEY ARE | | | GETTING REMOVED OR RELOCATED. | | | | | | -SHOW AND LABEL ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED SIDEWALK | | | EASEMENTS. (SOME MAY BE REQUIRED DUE TO PROPOSED | | | IMPROVEMENTS) | | | | | | -ADD A LEGEND ON PGD PLAN SHOWING WHAT THE DIFFERENT | | | SHADED AREAS ARE. | | | | | | -THERE IS A WATER WELL VAULT SHOWED IN PROPOSED | | | SIDEWALK. IF INTENDED TO BE WALKED ON, RECOMMEND | | | CHECKING FURTHER TO MAKE SURE THAT THE VAULT IS IN | | | SUITABLE CONDITION AND THAT IT CAN BE ADJUSTED TO MATCH | | | PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE. | | | | | | -PGD PLAN SHOWS DOORS OPENING INTO AREAS THAT LOOK LIKE | | | LANDSCAPING ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BUILDING. IS THAT | | | CORRECT; AND WILL THERE BE ELEVATION DIFFERENCE BETWEEN | | | DOOR AND LANDSCAPING GRADE? | | | | | | -ARE ANY ADDITIONAL SEWER CLEANOUTS NEEDED? IF SO, SHOW | | | ON UTILITY PLAN. | | | | | | -FIRELINE IS NOT COMPLIANT WITH BACKFLOW PROTECTION. | | | NEEDS TO BE UPGRADED TO ABOVE-GROUND DETECTOR ASSEMBLY | | | WHICH WOULD BE LOCATED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. RECOMMEND | | | INCLUDING IN THIS PROJECT AS UNDERGROUND PIPING MAY | | | NEED REPLACEMENT, VAULT STRUCTURE WOULD NEED REMOVAL, | | | AND WILL TAKE UP SPACE ON SITE. | | | | | | -WILL WATER DEMAND INCREASE? IF SO, ADD WATER DEMAND | | | CALCULATIONS ON UTILITY PLAN AND ENSURE THAT EXISTING | | | WATER SERVICE IS SUFFICIENT. | | | | | | -PLANTING PLAN IS SHOWING TWO STRM PIPES RUNNING ACROSS | | | TRINITY PL THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON CIVIL PLANS. PLEASE | | | VERIFY AND MAKE SURE ALL PLAN SETS MATCH. | | | | | | -LANDSCAPING PLANS SHOW LIGHT POLE IN PROPOSED SIDEWALK | | | ALONG FLAGLER AT EAST SIDE OF BUILDING. PLEASE ADD | | | CIVIL PLAN SHEETS FOR THAT AREA AND LABEL IF LIGHT POLE | | | IS INTENDED TO REMAIN. | | | | | | -PLANS DO NOT SHOW EXISTING SIGN POLES ALONG FLAGLER. | | | | | | -PROPOSED SEWER LATERAL IN RIGHT OF WAY SHOULD BE AT | | | LEAST 6 INCH SIZE. | | | | | | -DEMO PLAN SAYS FDC NEAR NORTHEAST AREA OF PROPERTY | | | WILL REMAIN, BUT UTILITY PLAN MAKES IT LOOK LIKE | | | MOVING. PLEASE CLARIFY ON PLANS. | | | | | | -PLANS SHOW STOP SIGN AT END OF CROSSWALK AT TRINITY | | | AND CHASE INTERSECTION IN MIDDLE OF PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC. | | | IS IT POSSIBLE TO RELOCATE SO NOT IN PEDESTRIAN | | | TRAFFIC? | | | | | | -PGD PLAN DOES NOT SHOW TRENCH DRAIN AT GARAGE ENTRANCE | | | ON CHASE. | | | | | | -LH3 SHOWS AN FDC IN SIDEWALK. | | | | | | -PLANS SHOW ALL OF CHASE STREET WITH PAVERS, BUT DEMO | | | PLAN ONLY SHOWS PORTION OF CHASE ST. BEING AFFECTED. | | | PLEASE CLARIFY INTENTION. | | | | | | -DO PLANS TAKE INTO ACCOUNT CURRENT CONSTRUCTION WORK | | | TAKING PLACE ON CHASE ST.? | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-01-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
07-01-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
07-01-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-07-01 14:32:47 | 1. THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF | | | REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY | | | AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND | | | WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. TO VIEW | | | DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER | | | ENGINEERING RELATED DOCUMENTS, CLICK HERE OR GO TO: HTT | | | PS://WWW.WPB.ORG/GOVERNMENT/ENGINEERING/ENGINEERING-FOR | | | MS-PERMITS-AND-APPLICATIONS . | | | 2. CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, | | | FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08, ADOPTED | | | SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18) CHAPTER 90 | | | UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. SEC. 90-7. | | | POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER SERVICE | | | FACILITIES OF THE CITY: | | | THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE | | | CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY | | | BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS, | | | BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION. | | | 3. AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR | | | MORE INFORMATION, CLICK HERE OR GO TO: HTTPS://WWW.WPB. | | | ORG/GOVERNMENT/ENGINEERING/ENGINEERING-FORMS-PERMITS-AN | | | D-APPLICATIONS . | | | 4. PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY | | | OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC | | | RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF | | | YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE | | | MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL | | | IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT | | | [email protected] OR 561-494-1040 FOR FURTHER | | | ASSISTANCE. | | | 5. PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS | | | OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES, | | | INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND | | | SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, | | | METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE | | | SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING | | | GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, | | | ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL | | | INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER | | | LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE | | | PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN | | | VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. | | | PLEASE SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT | | | MATERIAL. ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL | | | EXISTING AND PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, | | | INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & | | | TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL | | | UTILITY CROSSINGS. | | | 6. CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY | | | ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY | | | ROW. | | | 7. PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE | | | DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB | | | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION). | | | 8. UPDATE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND | | | PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM | | | AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE | | | PER FAC 64E-8 FOR WATER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR SEWER. | | | 9. NEW CONSTRUCTION OF WATER/SEWER SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | LATEST CITY STANDARD DETAILS. PLEASE UPDATE PLANS | | | ACCORDINGLY. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD | | | CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, | | | PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]: | | | | | | -FIRELINE IS NOT COMPLIANT WITH BACKFLOW PROTECTION. | | | NEEDS TO BE UPGRADED TO ABOVE-GROUND DETECTOR ASSEMBLY | | | WHICH WOULD BE LOCATED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. RECOMMEND | | | INCLUDING IN THIS PROJECT AS UNDERGROUND PIPING MAY | | | NEED REPLACEMENT, VAULT STRUCTURE WOULD NEED REMOVAL, | | | AND WILL TAKE UP SPACE ON SITE. | | | | | | -PRIVATE FDC THAT IS PROPOSED TO BE RELOCATED IS NOT | | | WITHIN PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | -WHAT WILL THE WELL BE USED FOR? | | | | | | -PROVIDE WATER DEMAND CALCULATIONS ON THE UTILITY PLAN, | | | AND VERIFY THAT THE EXISTING WATER & SEWER UTILITY | | | SERVICE WILL BE SUFFICIENT. | | | | | | -WATER SERVICE TAPS, PIPING, AND METERS ARE NOT CLEARLY | | | SHOWN ON UTILITY PLAN. PLEASE PROVIDE ENLARGED DETAIL | | | OF THAT AREA. CAN BE ON A SEPARATE SHEET IF NEEDED. | | | | | | -TREE IN ISLAND APPEARS CLOSE TO WATER MAIN. ADD ROOT | | | BARRIER IF ROOTS WILL ENCROACH ON WATER MAIN. | | | | | | -VERIFY THE NEW GYM AREA WILL TIE INTO EXISTING | | | PLUMBING. | | | | | | | | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | CONCERNS, THANKS. | | | RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES | | | DEPARTMENT | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 [email protected] | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-06-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
07-06-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
07-06-2021 |
Time |
11:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-07-06 12:14:38 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE INTENDED | | | TO PROVIDE GUIDANCE FOR BUILDING PLAN SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE | | | OCCUPANCY TYPE(S), PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION | | | CODE, AND WHETHER IT IS MIXED OR SEPARATED OCCUPANCIES. | | | | | | 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE | | | LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER | | | SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED | | | ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | SHOULD THE PROPOSED AFFECT THE LOCATIONS OF FIRE | | | HYDRANST AND FDC'S, ANY CHANGES SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | 9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER | | | THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY | | | ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM, | | | ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FS 61G AND | | | SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PERMIT. | | | | | | 9A) THE LOCATION OF ANY APPLICABLE DDCV AND FIRE LINE | | | LOCATIONS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND | | | SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, | | | THE CITY'S ENGINEERS OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND | | | THE CITY'S PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE. | | | | | | 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 11. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 12. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-31-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-31-2023 |
Time |
10:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-31-2023 |
Time |
10:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-03-31 10:29:19 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: PHILLIPS POINT Z21060007 | | | MARCH 31, 2023 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | PREVIOUS COMMENTS FROM: ANDREW BURNETT, LANDSCAPE | | | PLANNER 561-822-1562 | | | JULY, 2 2021 | | | 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE | | | REQUIREMENTS. LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST SATISFY A MINIMUM | | | TOTAL OF 50 POINTS FROM THE DESIGN OPTIONS CHART. THE | | | CHART MUST BE VISIBLE ON LANDSCAPE PLAN. 94-442(G) | | | 8/5/22 BOTTOM OF DESIGN OPTIONS CHART CUT OFF, SHOW | | | TOTAL. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. ALL TREES AND SHRUBS LISTED ON PLAN WILL | | | NEED TO MEET THE REQUIRED PLANT MATERIAL SPECIFICATION. | | | SIZE INFORMATION ON TABLE MISSING FOR SOME PLANTS. | | | SECTION 94-445 (4) REQUIRED PLANT MATERIAL | | | SPECIFICATIONS. SHADE AND FLOWERING TREES MINIMUM 12 | | | FEET IN HEIGHT AND FLORIDA GRADE #1 OR BETTER QUALITY. | | | PALM SPECIES MINIMUM EIGHT FEET CLEAR WOOD. SHRUBS | | | MINIMUM OF 3GALLON, GROUNDCOVER MAY BE SMALLER. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SHADE TREES FOR DIVIDER MEDIAN | | | IN VALET PARKING TURN AROUND. TO MAXIMIZE TREE CANOPY | | | COVERAGE OF PAVEMENT. 94-443 C 3 (C) | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. DUE TO LOSS OF LANDSCAPE BEDS AT BASE OF | | | THE BUILDING ON SOUTH SIDE OF TRINITY PL. THE ADDITION | | | OF AND MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPE BEDS & SHADE TREES ON | | | THE NORTH SIDE OF TRINITY PL IN ORDER TO MAXIMIZE TREE | | | CANOPY COVERAGE. AGREEMENT WILL BE NEEDED FOR | | | IMPROVEMENTS. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 4/8/22: | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE | | | TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON | | | SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS | | | SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, | | | MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST | | | REPORT SHOWING CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR | | | NATIVE TREES AND PALMS. | | | PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS REPORT FOR THE NATIVE TREES | | | PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED. TWO GREEN BUTTONWOODS AND ONE | | | LIVE OAK. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL TREE CANOPY SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE REMOVED AND THE TOTAL TREE CANOPY ADDED FROM | | | THE PLANT LIST. | | | CANOPY MITIGATION REQUIRED IS NOT CORRECT. FICUS | | | BENJAMINA IS CATEGORY 1 300 SQ FT MITIGATION DUE. | | | MACARTHUR PALM IS CATEGORY 4 WITH 50 SQ FT MITIGATION | | | DUE. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE TOTAL NUMBER SHOWN ON THE | | | PLANT LIST FOR THE ADDED AND RELOCATED ROYAL PALMS. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/5/22: | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. TREES AND PALMS ADDED NEAR PEDESTRIAN | | | AREAS AND STREET MUST BE TALL ENOUGH TO ALLOW 7 TO 8 | | | FEET CLEARANCE FOR PEDESTRIANS AND 13.5 FEET CLEARANCE | | | AT THE CURB FOR VEHICLES. THE COCONUT PALMS MUST BE | | | TALL ENOUGH AT INSTALLATION TO HAVE THE FRONDS ABOVE | | | TRAFFIC. TREES THAT WILL BE IN PROXIMITY TO TRAFFIC | | | AREAS MUST BE ABLE TO BE PRUNED TO PROVIDE CLEARANCE | | | WITHOUT REMOVING THE STRUCTURE OF THE TREE. | | | 9. SATISFIED. SEPARATE THE PLANT LIST INTO QUALIFYING | | | TREES AND PALMS MEETING CODE HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS AND | | | ACCENT OR ADDITIONS PLANTS THAT DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM | | | STANDARDS. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 11/15/22: | | | 10.SATISFIED. PROVIDE A COMPLETE SET OF PLANS FOR ALL | | | STREETSCAPE ADJACENT TO THE PD FOR REVIEW WITH THIS | | | PETITION. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE REQUIRED AND | | | PROVIDED STREET TREES FOR EACH SECTION OF THE PD. IF | | | THE MINIMUM NUMBER CANNOT BE PROVIDED ON ANY SEGMENT, | | | SHOW HOW THE NUMBER WAS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED OR A WAIVER | | | MUST BE REQUESTED. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREET TREES AND | | | RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE | | | THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-15-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
11-15-2022 |
Time |
14:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
11-15-2022 |
Time |
14:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-11-15 14:05:53 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: PHILLIPS POINT Z21060007 | | | NOVEMBER 15, 2022 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | PREVIOUS COMMENTS FROM: ANDREW BURNETT, LANDSCAPE | | | PLANNER 561-822-1562 | | | JULY, 2 2021 | | | 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE | | | REQUIREMENTS. LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST SATISFY A MINIMUM | | | TOTAL OF 50 POINTS FROM THE DESIGN OPTIONS CHART. THE | | | CHART MUST BE VISIBLE ON LANDSCAPE PLAN. 94-442(G) | | | 8/5/22 BOTTOM OF DESIGN OPTIONS CHART CUT OFF, SHOW | | | TOTAL. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. ALL TREES AND SHRUBS LISTED ON PLAN WILL | | | NEED TO MEET THE REQUIRED PLANT MATERIAL SPECIFICATION. | | | SIZE INFORMATION ON TABLE MISSING FOR SOME PLANTS. | | | SECTION 94-445 (4) REQUIRED PLANT MATERIAL | | | SPECIFICATIONS. SHADE AND FLOWERING TREES MINIMUM 12 | | | FEET IN HEIGHT AND FLORIDA GRADE #1 OR BETTER QUALITY. | | | PALM SPECIES MINIMUM EIGHT FEET CLEAR WOOD. SHRUBS | | | MINIMUM OF 3GALLON, GROUNDCOVER MAY BE SMALLER. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SHADE TREES FOR DIVIDER MEDIAN | | | IN VALET PARKING TURN AROUND. TO MAXIMIZE TREE CANOPY | | | COVERAGE OF PAVEMENT. 94-443 C 3 (C) | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. DUE TO LOSS OF LANDSCAPE BEDS AT BASE OF | | | THE BUILDING ON SOUTH SIDE OF TRINITY PL. THE ADDITION | | | OF AND MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPE BEDS & SHADE TREES ON | | | THE NORTH SIDE OF TRINITY PL IN ORDER TO MAXIMIZE TREE | | | CANOPY COVERAGE. AGREEMENT WILL BE NEEDED FOR | | | IMPROVEMENTS. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 4/8/22: | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE | | | TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON | | | SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS | | | SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, | | | MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST | | | REPORT SHOWING CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR | | | NATIVE TREES AND PALMS. | | | PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS REPORT FOR THE NATIVE TREES | | | PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED. TWO GREEN BUTTONWOODS AND ONE | | | LIVE OAK. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL TREE CANOPY SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE REMOVED AND THE TOTAL TREE CANOPY ADDED FROM | | | THE PLANT LIST. | | | CANOPY MITIGATION REQUIRED IS NOT CORRECT. FICUS | | | BENJAMINA IS CATEGORY 1 300 SQ FT MITIGATION DUE. | | | MACARTHUR PALM IS CATEGORY 4 WITH 50 SQ FT MITIGATION | | | DUE. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE TOTAL NUMBER SHOWN ON THE | | | PLANT LIST FOR THE ADDED AND RELOCATED ROYAL PALMS. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/5/22: | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. TREES AND PALMS ADDED NEAR PEDESTRIAN | | | AREAS AND STREET MUST BE TALL ENOUGH TO ALLOW 7 TO 8 | | | FEET CLEARANCE FOR PEDESTRIANS AND 13.5 FEET CLEARANCE | | | AT THE CURB FOR VEHICLES. THE COCONUT PALMS MUST BE | | | TALL ENOUGH AT INSTALLATION TO HAVE THE FRONDS ABOVE | | | TRAFFIC. TREES THAT WILL BE IN PROXIMITY TO TRAFFIC | | | AREAS MUST BE ABLE TO BE PRUNED TO PROVIDE CLEARANCE | | | WITHOUT REMOVING THE STRUCTURE OF THE TREE. | | | 9. SATISFIED. SEPARATE THE PLANT LIST INTO QUALIFYING | | | TREES AND PALMS MEETING CODE HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS AND | | | ACCENT OR ADDITIONS PLANTS THAT DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM | | | STANDARDS. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 11/15/22: | | | 10. PROVIDE A COMPLETE SET OF PLANS FOR ALL STREETSCAPE | | | ADJACENT TO THE PD FOR REVIEW WITH THIS PETITION. | | | PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED | | | STREET TREES FOR EACH SECTION OF THE PD. IF THE MINIMUM | | | NUMBER CANNOT BE PROVIDED ON ANY SEGMENT, SHOW HOW THE | | | NUMBER WAS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED OR A WAIVER MUST BE | | | REQUESTED. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREET TREES AND | | | RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE | | | THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-05-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
08-05-2022 |
Time |
16:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
08-05-2022 |
Time |
16:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-08-05 16:41:27 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: PHILLIPS POINT Z21060007 | | | AUGUST 5, 2022 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | PREVIOUS COMMENTS FROM: ANDREW BURNETT, LANDSCAPE | | | PLANNER 561-822-1562 | | | JULY, 2 2021 | | | 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS. LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST SATISFY A | | | MINIMUM TOTAL OF 50 POINTS FROM THE DESIGN OPTIONS | | | CHART. THE CHART MUST BE VISIBLE ON LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | 94-442(G) | | | 8/5/22 BOTTOM OF DESIGN OPTIONS CHART CUT OFF, SHOW | | | TOTAL. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. ALL TREES AND SHRUBS LISTED ON PLAN WILL | | | NEED TO MEET THE REQUIRED PLANT MATERIAL SPECIFICATION. | | | SIZE INFORMATION ON TABLE MISSING FOR SOME PLANTS. | | | SECTION 94-445 (4) REQUIRED PLANT MATERIAL | | | SPECIFICATIONS. SHADE AND FLOWERING TREES MINIMUM 12 | | | FEET IN HEIGHT AND FLORIDA GRADE #1 OR BETTER QUALITY. | | | PALM SPECIES MINIMUM EIGHT FEET CLEAR WOOD. SHRUBS | | | MINIMUM OF 3GALLON, GROUNDCOVER MAY BE SMALLER. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SHADE TREES FOR DIVIDER MEDIAN | | | IN VALET PARKING TURN AROUND. TO MAXIMIZE TREE CANOPY | | | COVERAGE OF PAVEMENT. 94-443 C 3 (C) | | | | | | 4. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. DUE TO LOSS OF LANDSCAPE | | | BEDS AT BASE OF THE BUILDING ON SOUTH SIDE OF TRINITY | | | PL. THE ADDITION OF AND MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPE BEDS & | | | SHADE TREES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TRINITY PL IN ORDER TO | | | MAXIMIZE TREE CANOPY COVERAGE. AGREEMENT WILL BE NEEDED | | | FOR IMPROVEMENTS. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 4/8/22: | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE | | | TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON | | | SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS | | | SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, | | | MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST | | | REPORT SHOWING CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR | | | NATIVE TREES AND PALMS. | | | PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS REPORT FOR THE NATIVE TREES | | | PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED. TWO GREEN BUTTONWOODS AND ONE | | | LIVE OAK. | | | | | | 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL TREE CANOPY | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE REMOVED AND THE TOTAL TREE CANOPY ADDED | | | FROM THE PLANT LIST. | | | CANOPY MITIGATION REQUIRED IS NOT CORRECT. FICUS | | | BENJAMINA IS CATEGORY 1 300 SQ FT MITIGATION DUE. | | | MACARTHUR PALM IS CATEGORY 4 WITH 50 SQ FT MITIGATION | | | DUE. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE TOTAL NUMBER SHOWN ON THE | | | PLANT LIST FOR THE ADDED AND RELOCATED ROYAL PALMS. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/5/22: | | | | | | 8. TREES AND PALMS ADDED NEAR PEDESTRIAN AREAS AND | | | STREET MUST BE TALL ENOUGH TO ALLOW 7 TO 8 FEET | | | CLEARANCE FOR PEDESTRIANS AND 13.5 FEET CLEARANCE AT | | | THE CURB FOR VEHICLES. THE COCONUT PALMS MUST BE TALL | | | ENOUGH AT INSTALLATION TO HAVE THE FRONDS ABOVE | | | TRAFFIC. TREES THAT WILL BE IN PROXIMITY TO TRAFFIC | | | AREAS MUST BE ABLE TO BE PRUNED TO PROVIDE CLEARANCE | | | WITHOUT REMOVING THE STRUCTURE OF THE TREE. | | | 9. SEPARATE THE PLANT LIST INTO QUALIFYING TREES AND | | | PALMS MEETING CODE HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS AND ACCENT OR | | | ADDITIONS PLANTS THAT DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM | | | STANDARDS. | | | | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREET TREES AND | | | RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE | | | THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-09-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
04-09-2022 |
Time |
10:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
04-09-2022 |
Time |
09:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-04-09 10:00:36 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: PHILLIPS POINT Z21060007 | | | APRIL 8, 2022 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | PREVIOUS COMMENTS FROM: ANDREW BURNETT, LANDSCAPE | | | PLANNER 561-822-1562 | | | JULY, 2 2021 | | | 1. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE | | | REQUIREMENTS. LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST SATISFY A MINIMUM | | | TOTAL OF 50 POINTS FROM THE DESIGN OPTIONS CHART. THE | | | CHART MUST BE VISIBLE ON LANDSCAPE PLAN. 94-442(G) | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. ALL TREES AND SHRUBS LISTED ON PLAN WILL | | | NEED TO MEET THE REQUIRED PLANT MATERIAL SPECIFICATION. | | | SIZE INFORMATION ON TABLE MISSING FOR SOME PLANTS. | | | SECTION 94-445 (4) REQUIRED PLANT MATERIAL | | | SPECIFICATIONS. SHADE AND FLOWERING TREES MINIMUM 12 | | | FEET IN HEIGHT AND FLORIDA GRADE #1 OR BETTER QUALITY. | | | PALM SPECIES MINIMUM EIGHT FEET CLEAR WOOD. SHRUBS | | | MINIMUM OF 3GALLON, GROUNDCOVER MAY BE SMALLER. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SHADE TREES FOR DIVIDER MEDIAN | | | IN VALET PARKING TURN AROUND. TO MAXIMIZE TREE CANOPY | | | COVERAGE OF PAVEMENT. 94-443 C 3 (C) | | | | | | 4. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. DUE TO LOSS OF LANDSCAPE | | | BEDS AT BASE OF THE BUILDING ON SOUTH SIDE OF TRINITY | | | PL. THE ADDITION OF AND MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPE BEDS & | | | SHADE TREES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TRINITY PL IN ORDER TO | | | MAXIMIZE TREE CANOPY COVERAGE. AGREEMENT WILL BE NEEDED | | | FOR IMPROVEMENTS. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 4/8/22: | | | | | | 5. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES AND | | | PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR | | | RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY | | | EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR | | | POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT SHOWING | | | CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR NATIVE TREES AND | | | PALMS. | | | PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS REPORT FOR THE NATIVE TREES | | | PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED. TWO GREEN BUTTONWOODS AND ONE | | | LIVE OAK. | | | | | | 6. PROVIDE THE TOTAL TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE REMOVED | | | AND THE TOTAL TREE CANOPY ADDED FROM THE PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 7. CORRECT THE TOTAL NUMBER SHOWN ON THE PLANT LIST FOR | | | THE ADDED AND RELOCATED ROYAL PALMS. | | | | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREET TREES AND | | | RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE | | | THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-06-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aburnett |
Date |
07-06-2021 |
Time |
16:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aburnett |
Date |
07-06-2021 |
Time |
16:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-07-06 16:28:12 | FROM: ANDREW BURNETT, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1562 | | | PROJECT: PHILLIPS POINT DROP OFF AREA ON TRINITY PLACE | | | Z21060007 | | | JULY, 2 2021 | | | 1. PROVIDE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS. | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST SATISFY A MINIMUM TOTAL OF 50 | | | POINTS FROM THE DESIGN OPTIONS CHART. THE CHART MUST BE | | | VISIBLE ON LANDSCAPE PLAN. 94-442(G) | | | | | | 2. ALL TREES AND SHRUBS LISTED ON PLAN WILL NEED TO | | | MEET THE REQUIRED PLANT MATERIAL SPECIFICATION. SIZE | | | INFORMATION ON TABLE MISSING FOR SOME PLANTS. | | | SECTION 94-445 (4) REQUIRED PLANT MATERIAL | | | SPECIFICATIONS. SHADE AND FLOWERING TREES MINIMUM 12 | | | FEET IN HEIGHT AND FLORIDA GRADE #1 OR BETTER QUALITY. | | | PALM SPECIES MINIMUM EIGHT FEET CLEAR WOOD. SHRUBS | | | MINIMUM OF 3GALLON, GROUNDCOVER MAY BE SMALLER. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE SHADE TREES FOR DIVIDER MEDIAN IN VALET | | | PARKING TURN AROUND. TO MAXIMIZE TREE CANOPY COVERAGE | | | OF PAVEMENT. 94-443 C 3 (C) | | | | | | 4. DUE TO LOSS OF LANDSCAPE BEDS AT BASE OF THE | | | BUILDING ON SOUTH SIDE OF TRINITY PL. THE ADDITION OF | | | AND MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPE BEDS & SHADE TREES ON THE | | | NORTH SIDE OF TRINITY PL IN ORDER TO MAXIMIZE TREE | | | CANOPY COVERAGE. AGREEMENT WILL BE NEEDED FOR | | | INPROVEMENTS | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PU-CS |
PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-19-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mhurley |
Date |
07-19-2022 |
Time |
10:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mhurley |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-29-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
03-29-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
03-29-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-06-24 15:47:34 | NO OBJECTION FROM PUBLIC WORKS. | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-08-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
07-08-2021 |
Time |
10:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
07-08-2021 |
Time |
10:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-07-08 10:34:48 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. CONSIDER ADDING A 'NO RIGHT TURN' SIGN FOR EASTBOUND | | | S. FLAGLER DRIVE BEFORE THE TURN ONTO TRINITY PLACE. | | | | | | 2. THERE APPEARS TO BE 2 INCH DROP AT THE EAST SIDE OF | | | THE NEW CONNECTION BETWEEN TRINITY PLACE AND S. FLAGLER | | | DRIVE (PROPOSED 3.24 FEET TO EXISTING 3.08). | | | | | | 3. NO DETECTIBLE WARNING HATCHING PER THE SHEET LEGEND | | | IS SHOWN ON SHEET C5.00. | | | | | | 4. CONSIDER ADJUSTING THE NORTH END OF THE SIDEWALK | | | NEXT TO THE DROP OFF AREA TO AVOID THE STORMWATER | | | MANHOLE. | | | | | | 5. IT APPEARS RUNOFF FROM MOST OF THE DROP OFF AREA | | | WILL DRAIN TO S. FLAGLER DRIVE. REGRADE THIS AREA TO | | | LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF RUNOFF TO S. FLAGLER DRIVE. | | | | | | 6. VERIFY THE PROPOSED RIM ELEVATION OF 4.80 FT NAVD | | | FOR THE EXISTING INLET SHOWN EAST OF THE SECTION A-A | | | SYMBOL. THE NEAREST SPOT GRADE ON THE EP NEXT TO THE | | | VALLEY GUTTER IS 4.16 FT NAVD. | | | | | | 7. FOR ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE A DETAIL | | | FOR RAISING THE EXISTING STRUCTURES TO GRADE. | | | 'CHIMNEYS' MORE THAN 8 INCHES HIGH MAY NOT PROVIDE | | | ACCESS TO THE BOTTOM OF THE STRUCTURE. | | | | | | 8. FOR ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE A CATCH | | | BASIN DETAIL SHOWING FLUSH GRATE TO BE USED IN LINE | | | WITH THE VALLEY GUTTER. | | | | | | 9. PLEASE NUMBER THE DRAINAGE AND SANITARY STRUCTURES | | | FOR EASE OF REFERENCE. | | | | | | 10. CAN THE YARD DRAIN SHOWN SOUTH OF THE SECTION B-B | | | SYMBOL BE LOCATED OVER THE INTERSECTION OF THE TWO | | | PROPOSED 12 INCH HDPE PIPES. | | | | | | 11. USE MINIMUM 15 INCH DIAMETER PIPE, RCP WHEN | | | FEASIBLE. | | | | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | | | | 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED | | | WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP OR ERP MODIFICATION | | | IF THERE IS AN EXISTING PERMIT. | | | | | | 4. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED WITH THE | | | ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 (O) | | | 561-351-0510 (M) | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-06-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
07-06-2021 |
Time |
09:33 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-07-06 09:38:33 | 1. NEED FULL SIZE .PDF OF SURVEY. UNABLE TO READ 8 1/2 | | | X 11" PDF. | | | 2. CORNERS ARE MISSING ON SURVEY. | | | 3. ROADWAY EASEMENT AGREEMENT WILL NEED TO BE MODIFIED | | | AND CITY RELIEVED OF MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY. | | | 4. NEED TO SHOW OWNERSHIP OF ADJOINING PARK/CHURCH | | | PROPERTY ALONG WITH DEEDS. | | | 5. AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EXISTING AND PROPOSED | | | IMPROVEMENTS IN PARK AREA EAST OF ROADWAY. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-15-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
03-15-2023 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
03-15-2023 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2023-03-15 09:51:46 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS | | | 1) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY CHANGES IN TRIP GENERATION? | | | IF SO: | | | 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE UPDATED TRAFFIC STATEMENT | | | 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER ONCE RECEIVED | | | 4) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A QUEUE ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED | | | PICK-UP/DROP-OFF LOCATION. ANALYSIS MUST SHOWCASE | | | VEHICLES??? PATHS TO/FROM THE GARAGE AND OPERATIONAL | | | DETAILS (E.G. HOURS OF OPERATION, NUMBER OF VALETS, | | | ETC.). NOT ALL REQUESTED INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED | | | OR COMPUTED IN THE CALCULATIONS | | | 5) SATISFIED. EXPLAIN THE REASONING FOR THE SIGNIFICANT | | | DIFFERENCE BETWEEN EXISTING AND PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT???S INTERNAL TRIP CAPTURE PERCENTAGES | | | SITE COMMENTS | | | 6) SATISFIED. IF SANITATION OR DELIVERY VEHICLES WILL | | | TRAVERSE THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, PROVIDE AUTOTURN | | | ANALYSIS WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES CLEARLY | | | DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE | | | FILE/DRAWING | | | 7) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY | | | ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 | | | FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS | | | (CIRCUIT BOX AND ELECTRIC CONDUIT). THE PROPOSED | | | LOCATION IS NOT AS | | | 8) SATISFIED. PROVIDE BICYCLE RACKS NEARBY THE ENTRANCE | | | 9) SATISFIED. INSTALL AN 8 FEET WIDE SIDEWALK AT | | | TRINITY PARK ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT | | | 10) SATISFIED. ROADWAY WIDTH MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 18 | | | FEET WIDE, REDESIGN/REALLOCATE THE PROPOSED ISLAND BY | | | THE VALET SITE ACCORDINGLY | | | 11) SATISFIED. REDESIGN THE EXIT DRIVEWAY ON FLAGLER DR | | | TO ALLOW STRAIGHT AND RIGHT-TURN MOVEMENTS | | | 12) SATISFIED. INSTALL DO NOT ENTER SIGN IN FRONT OF | | | THE FLAGLER DRIVEWAY | | | 13) SATISFIED. INSTALL NO RIGHT-TURN SIGN UPSTREAM OF | | | THE FLAGLER DRIVEWAY ALONG THE SB DIRECTION | | | 14) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PAVEMENT MARKINGS (E.G. LANE, | | | DIRECTIONAL) TO BETTER MANAGE VEHICULAR MOVEMENTS BY | | | THE PICK-UP/DROP-OFF AREA | | | 15) SATISFIED. INSTALL FIXED METAL BOLLARDS EVERY 10 | | | FEET ALONG BOTH SIDEWALKS FOR PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AND | | | NO-PARKING ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES | | | 16) SATISFIED. REALIGN THE WALKWAY FROM TRINITY PARK SO | | | THAT IS PERPENDICULAR TO THE SOUTHERN SIDEWALK. INSTALL | | | A PEDESTRIAN CROSSING ACCORDINGLY | | | 17) SATISFIED. INSTALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS ON TRINITY IN | | | FRONT OF THE VALET AREA EXIT DRIVEWAY SO TO PROPERLY | | | DIRECT VEHICLES IN THE TRANSITION FROM ONE-WAY TO | | | TWO-WAY TRAFFIC. A WEDGE WITH CHEVRON MARKINGS IS | | | SUGGESTED | | | 18) SATISFIED. DIRECTIONAL ARROWS ALONG TRINITY BY THE | | | VALET ISLAND SHOULD BE KEPT/INSTALLED | | | 19) SATISFIED. INSTALL A SECOND DO-NOT-ENTER SIGN AT | | | THE VALET HIGHLAND, BY THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE VALET EXIT | | | DRIVEWAY | | | 20) SATISFIED. CROSSWALKS AT THE TRINITY AND CHASE | | | INTERSECTION MUST BE PERPENDICULAR TO THE CURB | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-02-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
08-02-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-08-02 11:51:56 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS | | | 1) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY CHANGES IN TRIP GENERATION? | | | IF SO: | | | 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE UPDATED TRAFFIC STATEMENT | | | 3) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER ONCE | | | RECEIVED | | | 4) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A QUEUE ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED | | | PICK-UP/DROP-OFF LOCATION. ANALYSIS MUST SHOWCASE | | | VEHICLES? PATHS TO/FROM THE GARAGE AND OPERATIONAL | | | DETAILS (E.G. HOURS OF OPERATION, NUMBER OF VALETS, | | | ETC.). NOT ALL REQUESTED INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED | | | OR COMPUTED IN THE CALCULATIONS | | | 5) EXPLAIN THE REASONING FOR THE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE | | | BETWEEN EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT?S INTERNAL | | | TRIP CAPTURE PERCENTAGES | | | | | | SITE COMMENTS | | | 6) SATISFIED. IF SANITATION OR DELIVERY VEHICLES WILL | | | TRAVERSE THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, PROVIDE AUTOTURN | | | ANALYSIS WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES CLEARLY | | | DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE | | | FILE/DRAWING | | | 7) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY | | | ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 | | | FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS | | | (CIRCUIT BOX AND ELECTRIC CONDUIT). | | | 8) SATISFIED. PROVIDE BICYCLE RACKS NEARBY THE ENTRANCE | | | 9) SATISFIED. INSTALL AN 8 FEET WIDE SIDEWALK AT | | | TRINITY PARK ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT | | | 10) SATISFIED. ROADWAY WIDTH MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 18 | | | FEET WIDE, REDESIGN/REALLOCATE THE PROPOSED ISLAND BY | | | THE VALET SITE ACCORDINGLY | | | 11) SATISFIED. REDESIGN THE EXIT DRIVEWAY ON FLAGLER DR | | | TO ALLOW STRAIGHT AND RIGHT-TURN MOVEMENTS | | | 12) SATISFIED. INSTALL DO NOT ENTER SIGN IN FRONT OF | | | THE FLAGLER DRIVEWAY | | | 13) SATISFIED. INSTALL NO RIGHT-TURN SIGN UPSTREAM OF | | | THE FLAGLER DRIVEWAY ALONG THE SB DIRECTION | | | 14) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PAVEMENT MARKINGS (E.G. LANE, | | | DIRECTIONAL) TO BETTER MANAGE VEHICULAR MOVEMENTS BY | | | THE PICK-UP/DROP-OFF AREA | | | 15) SATISFIED. INSTALL FIXED METAL BOLLARDS EVERY 10 | | | FEET ALONG BOTH SIDEWALKS FOR PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AND | | | NO-PARKING ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES | | | 16) SATISFIED. REALIGN THE WALKWAY FROM TRINITY PARK SO | | | THAT IS PERPENDICULAR TO THE SOUTHERN SIDEWALK. INSTALL | | | A PEDESTRIAN CROSSING ACCORDINGLY | | | 17) INSTALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS ON TRINITY IN FRONT OF | | | THE VALET AREA EXIT DRIVEWAY SO TO PROPERLY DIRECT | | | VEHICLES IN THE TRANSITION FROM ONE-WAY TO TWO-WAY | | | TRAFFIC. A WEDGE WITH CHEVRON MARKINGS IS SUGGESTED | | | 18) DIRECTIONAL ARROWS ALONG TRINITY BY THE VALET | | | ISLAND SHOULD BE KEPT/INSTALLED | | | 19) INSTALL A SECOND DO-NOT-ENTER SIGN AT THE VALET | | | HIGHLAND, BY THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE VALET EXIT DRIVEWAY | | | | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-12-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
04-12-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-04-12 20:05:17 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS | | | 1) ARE THERE ANY CHANGES IN TRIP GENERATION? IF SO: | | | 2) PROVIDE UPDATED TRAFFIC STATEMENT | | | 3) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | 4) PROVIDE A QUEUE ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED | | | PICK-UP/DROP-OFF LOCATION. ANALYSIS MUST SHOWCASE | | | VEHICLES? PATHS TO/FROM THE GARAGE AND OPERATIONAL | | | DETAILS (E.G. HOURS OF OPERATION, NUMBER OF VALET, | | | ETC.) | | | | | | SITE COMMENTS | | | 5) IF SANITATION OR DELIVERY VEHICLES WILL TRAVERSE THE | | | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS WITH | | | VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS | | | SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING | | | 6) IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY ACCESSIBLE | | | MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 FEET) AND | | | PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS (CIRCUIT BOX | | | AND ELECTRIC CONDUIT) | | | 7) PROVIDE BICYCLE RACKS NEARBY THE ENTRANCE | | | 8) INSTALL AN 8 FEET WIDE SIDEWALK AT TRINITY PARK ON | | | THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT | | | 9) ROADWAY WIDTH MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 18 FEET WIDE, | | | REDESIGN/REALLOCATE THE PROPOSED ISLAND BY THE VALET | | | SITE ACCORDINGLY | | | 10) REDESIGN THE EXIT DRIVEWAY ON FLAGLER DR TO ALLOW | | | STRAIGHT AND RIGHT-TURN MOVEMENTS | | | 11) INSTALL DO NOT ENTER SIGN IN FRONT OF THE FLAGLER | | | DRIVEWAY | | | 12) INSTALL NO RIGHT-TURN SIGN UPSTREAM OF THE FLAGLER | | | DRIVEWAY ALONG THE SB DIRECTION | | | 13) PROVIDE PAVEMENT MARKINGS (E.G. LANE, DIRECTIONAL) | | | TO BETTER MANAGE VEHICULAR MOVEMENTS BY THE | | | PICK-UP/DROP-OFF AREA | | | 14) INSTALL FIXED METAL BOLLARDS EVERY 10 FEET ALONG | | | BOTH SIDEWALKS FOR PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AND NO-PARKING | | | ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES | | | 15) REALIGN THE WALKWAY FROM TRINITY PARK SO THAT IS | | | PERPENDICULAR TO THE SOUTHERN SIDEWALK. INSTALL A | | | PEDESTRIAN CROSSING ACCORDINGLY | | | | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-08-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
07-08-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-07-08 11:47:33 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS | | | 1) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | 2) IN THE STUDY, PROVIDE A FIGURE SHOWCASING PEAK | | | HOURS? DRIVEWAY TURNING VOLUMES | | | | | | SITE COMMENTS | | | 1) IF SANITATION OR DELIVERY VEHICLES WILL TRAVERSE THE | | | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS WITH | | | VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS | | | SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING | | | 2) IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY ACCESSIBLE | | | MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 FEET) AND | | | PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS (CIRCUIT BOX | | | AND ELECTRIC CONDUIT) | | | 3) PROVIDE BICYCLE RACKS NEARBY THE ENTRANCE | | | 4) INSTALL A SIDEWALK ON THE NORTH SIDE | | | 5) SPECIFY THE USE OF THE TURNAROUND SPACE. IS PARKING | | | ALLOWED? IS IT MONITORED OR VALET SERVICE PROVIDED? | | | | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-11-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ckimmerl |
Date |
08-11-2022 |
Time |
10:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ckimmerl |
Date |
08-11-2022 |
Time |
10:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-08-11 10:52:29 | ZONING COMMENTS 8.10.22 | | | | | | 1. AS PER THE CHANGE IN PROJECT SCOPE, STAFF RECOGNIZES | | | THE DOWNGRADE | | | FROM A MAJOR PD AMENDMENT TO THAT OF A MINOR PD | | | AMENDMENT, AS THERE ARE NO CHANGES TO TOTAL SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE OF ANY BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURES ONSITE, NO | | | CHANGES TO PD BOUNDARIES, OR CHANGES IN PD CONDITIONS. | | | RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | | | | 2. STAFF HAS CONCERNS WITH THE ADDITIONAL DROP-OFF | | | LOCATION ALONG TRINITY PL. WITHIN PUBLIC LAND. THE | | | PROPOSED DROP-OFF REQUIRES AND ENCROACHES SIGNIFICANTLY | | | INTO CITY-OWNED LAND. IT WILL SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACT | | | GREENSPACE ALONG FLAGLER DR. FOR THE USE OF AN EXTRA | | | VEHICULAR DROP-OFF.CONVEYANCE OR USE OF THE CITY-OWNED | | | LAND FOR THE DROP-OFF WILL REQUIRE SIGNIFICANT | | | IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SURROUNDING GREENSPACE AND PUBLIC | | | REALM ALONG BOTH THE ROW OF TRINITY PL. AND FLAGLER DR. | | | TO COMPENSATE FOR THE NEGATIVE IMPACT OF THE ADDITIONAL | | | DROP-OFF AREA. THESE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL INCLUDE | | | ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING (STREET TREES, PLANTINGS, ETC.) | | | SEATING, AND PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS. | | | RESPONSE: COORDINATION WITH CITY STAFF HAS BEEN DONE TO | | | PROVIDE THE REQUESTED IMPROVEMENTS. | | | [NOT SATISFIED] | | | | | | WILL REQUIRE AN APPROVED MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE | | | CITY, WHICH ASSIGNS THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSOR, AND | | | ASSIGNS THE RESPONSIBILITY TO MAINTAIN THE PD SITE, | | | ROW, AND TRINITY PARK. | | | | | | CITY TO ISSUE A LICENSE OF NONEXCLUSIVE USE FOR PORTION | | | OF CITY PARK PROPERTY GIVES PERMISSION TO USE THE LAND | | | AND MAKE IMPROVEMENTS BUT CAN BE REVOKED AT ANY TIME BY | | | THE CITY. FURTHER DISCUSSIONS NECESSARY WITH LEGAL | | | DEPT., PARKS & REC., AND PLANNING. | | | | | | THE ADDITION OF THE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION ALONG | | | TRINITY PARK NEEDS RELOCATION. LOCATION CONFLICTS WITH | | | THE CITY?S BRIGHTLINE/BRIGHTBIKE SHARING STATION ALONG | | | THE CHASE ST. AND PARK FRONTAGE. APPROVED PLANS FOR | | | BIKESHARE LOCATION ATTACHED TO COMMENTS, AND EMAILED TO | | | APPLICANT. ADDITIONALLY, THE MEETING WITH STAFF AND | | | APPLICANT DETERMINED A LOCATION CLOSER TO THE ENTRANCE | | | OF THE RESTAURANT OR ALONG THE S. FLAGLER FRONTAGE | | | (ADJACENT TO THE SIDEWALK AT THE INTERSECTION OF | | | TRINITY PL. & S. FLAGLER, ON OR CLOSER TO PD PROPERTY) | | | AS A MORE APPROPRIATE LOCATION. NO CONCRETE PAD OR | | | FACILITY HOOKUPS NEED TO BE INSTALLED AT THIS TIME, | | | STAFF ONLY REQUESTS THAT AN APPROPRIATE SPACE IS | | | RESERVED FOR WHEN A CITY MICRO-MOBILITY PROGRAM COMES | | | ONLINE. | | | | | | 3. WITH THE REMOVAL OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE ON CORNER | | | OF TRINITY PL. AND CHASE ST., STAFF IS CONCERNED WITH | | | THE REDUCED CHANCE FOR ACTIVITY ON THE GROUND LEVEL OF | | | TRINITY PL. WHAT IS GOING ON WITHIN THIS SPACE? A. | | | SHEET C4.02 SHOWS ENTRANCES ON THE SIDEWALK AND CORNER | | | SIDE, THESE CANNOT BE ACCESSED FROM THE TRINITY PL. | | | SIDEWALK. | | | RESPONSE: PLEASE SEE SHEET C4.00, THE DOORS HAVE BEEN | | | REVISED. | | | [SATISFIED] DOORS REMOVED FROM PLANS. DISCUSSIONS WITH | | | STAFF CLARIFIED USE OF SPACE FOR FUTURE TENANT OR | | | RESTAURANT. | | | | | | 4. "WATER WELL FOR COOLING SYSTEM" VAULT SHOWN IN | | | SIDEWALK/ROW. NOTE CLAIMS TO PUT THIS VAULT AT GRADE, | | | PLANS ALSO SHOW 3'-7" OF CLEARANCE ON THE SIDEWALK. | | | WILL VAULT IMPEDE PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC ON THE SIDEWALK, | | | PLEASE CLARIFY? | | | RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO SHEET C5.00, THE EXISTING LID | | | WILL BE RELOCATED AND ADJUSTED TO GRADE. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | | | | 5. END OF DROP-OFF WHERE TRINITY PL. MEETS FLAGLER DR | | | WILL REQUIRE AN ALTERATION TO THE EGRESS TO | | | DISCOURAGE/PREVENT ENTRANCE FROM SOUTHBOUND CARS ALONG | | | FLAGLER DR. THE TRINITY PL. EXIT REQUIRES SIGNAGE FOR | | | STRAIGHT AND RIGHT TURN ONLY, WITH THE ADDITION OF A NO | | | ENTRY SIGN ON FLAGLER DR. | | | RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO SHEET C4.00, SIGNAGE AND CURB | | | MODIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN ADDED. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | | | | 6. MINIMUM WIDTH OF TWO-WAY SHALL BE 18'. PLEASE | | | INCREASE AREA AROUND DROP-OFF TO BE 18' IN WIDTH AT A | | | MINIMUM PLUS THE SIDE GUTTERS. | | | RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO SHEET C4.00, THE MINIMUM | | | WIDTH FOR A TWO-WAY IS PROVIDED. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | | | | 7. WHAT IS HAPPENING THE WITH FDC CONNECTION WITHIN THE | | | TRIANGULAR SECTION OF GREENSPACE BETWEEN TRINITY PL. | | | AND FLAGLER DR.? IS THIS BEING RELOCATED? PLEASE | | | CLARIFY. | | | RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO SHEET C6.00, EXISTING FDC TO | | | REMAIN. | | | [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] ANY GROUND-MOUNTED MECHANICAL | | | EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW WITH LANDSCAPE | | | HEDGES. | | | | | | 8. PLEASE MODIFY OR REALIGN THE EXISTING PEDESTRIAN | | | PATH FROM TRINITY PARK, ADJUST IT TO BE PERPENDICULAR | | | TO THE SOUTHERN SIDEWALK ALONGTRINITY PL (MAKING A MORE | | | DIRECT/SHORTER PEDESTRIAN CROSSING OVER THE | | | TRAVEL/DROP-OFF LANES). | | | RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO SHEET C4.00, THE PEDESTRIAN | | | PATH HAS BEEN REVISED. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | | | | 9. ADDITION OF A SIDEWALK ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TRINITY | | | PLACE WITH ADDITIONAL STREET TREES. | | | RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO SHEET C4.00, AN 8? SIDEWALK | | | AND LANDSCAPE AREA HAS BEEN ADDED. | | | [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SIDEWALK LOCATION CONFLICTS WITH | | | THE CITY?S BRIGHTLINE/BRIGHTBIKE SHARING STATION ALONG | | | THE CHASE ST. AND PARK FRONTAGE. APPROVED PLANS FOR | | | BIKESHARE LOCATION ATTACHED TO COMMENTS, AND EMAILED TO | | | APPLICANT. PLEASE ADJUST ACCORDINGLY. | | | | | | 10. PLEASE CONFIRM ALL RESTAURANT SEATING IS OUTDOORS, | | | NOT ENCLOSED, AND NOT UNDER AC. | | | RESPONSE: CONFIRMED. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | | | | 11. IS THE BUILDING COLOR PROPOSED TO BE CHANGED FROM | | | THE EXISTING PINK? RENDERS SEEM TO SUGGEST CHANGE. | | | RESPONSE: NO COLOR CHANGE IS PROPOSED AT THIS TIME. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | | | | 12. PLEASE PROVIDE FDOT APPROVAL FOR THE STREETSCAPE | | | CHANGES ALONG LAKEVIEW AVE. | | | RESPONSE: LAKEVIEW AVENUE IS NO LONGER PART OF THIS | | | PROJECT?S SCOPE OF WORK. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | | | | RESPONSE: THE PHILLIPS POINT MINOR AMENDMENT AND THE | | | ESPERANTE & PHILLIPS POINT STREETSCAPE PROJECTS HAVE | | | BEEN SEPARATED INTO TWO SEPARATE PROJECTS UNDER | | | SEPARATE COVERS AND THE LIMITS OF SCOPE OF WORK BETWEEN | | | EACH PROJECT IS SHOWN IN THE EXHIBIT ENCLOSED. THE | | | TRANSITION POINTS BETWEEN THE TWO PROJECTS OCCURS AT | | | THE EASTERN SIDE OF THE TRINITY PLACE AND CHASE AVENUE | | | INTERSECTION AND ALSO MID-WAY ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE AS | | | SHOWN IN THE EXHIBIT WITH A RED DASHED LINE. THE REASON | | | FOR THE SEPARATION, IS BECAUSE THE ESPERANTE & PHILLIPS | | | POINT STREETSCAPE PROJECT DOES NOT PROPOSE ANY BUILDING | | | MODIFICATIONS, WHILE THE PHILLIPS POINT MINOR AMENDMENT | | | DOES INCLUDE BUILDING MODIFICATIONS. | | | | | | [NOTE.] COMMENT FROM Z22070013 (FSPR 22-12) STREETSCAPE | | | CANNOT BE SUBMITTED UNDER ONE UMBRELLA AMENDMENT OR | | | APPLICATION, AS THIS IS IMPACTING TWO SEPARATE PLANNED | | | DEVELOPMENTS AND THEIR RESPECTIVE LANDSCAPE/STREETSCAPE | | | PLANS. WILL HAVE TO PARTITION INTO THREE SEPARATE | | | APPLICATIONS/AMENDMENTS: A PHILLIPS POINT MINOR FOR | | | STREETSCAPE/LANDSCAPE, ESPERANTE MINOR FOR | | | STREETSCAPE/LANDSCAPE, AND THE CHASE ST. FACE OF CITY. | | | | | | 13. A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY SHALL BE | | | APPROVED ASSIGNING THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS, AND | | | ASSIGNS THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE | | | ENTIRE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SITE AND THE SUBSEQUENT | | | PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY, LANDSCAPING, AND IRRIGATION AS | | | PART OF THE PROPOSED CHANGES. | | | RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. | | | [SATISFIED] WILL INCLUDE AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL. | | | | | | 14. THE PLANTERS SCREENING THE GARAGE FACADE SHALL BE | | | RESTORED WITH PLANT MATERIAL. | | | RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED AT THE GROUND LEVEL. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | | | | 15. WILL HAVE TO COORDINATE IN THE FUTURE WITH SPECIAL | | | EVENTS IN REGARDS TO TRINITY PL. ACCESS AND | | | CIRCULATION, ESPECIALLY DURING THE PB BOAT SHOW AND | | | SUNFEST. | | | RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. | | | [SATISFIED] | | | | | | | | | NEW COMMENT 8.11.22 | | | | | | 1. PLEASE INCLUDE ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING WITHIN THE | | | TRIANGULAR SECTION OF GREENSPACE BETWEEN TRINITY PL. | | | AND FLAGLER DR., (THE AREA WITHIN LP-2, ADJACENT TO | | | SIDEWALK AND BIKE RACK AREA). ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING | | | PROVIDES A CONTINUOUS/SEAMLESS TRANSITION FROM PARK | | | LANDSCAPING TO THE OUTDOOR DINING AREAS LANDSCAPING, | | | AND ENHANCES PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT WITH SHADE OR | | | AESTHETIC IMPROVEMENTS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-13-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ckimmerl |
Date |
04-13-2022 |
Time |
12:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ckimmerl |
Date |
04-13-2022 |
Time |
12:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-04-13 12:15:35 | 1. AS PER THE CHANGE IN PROJECT SCOPE, STAFF RECOGNIZES | | | THE DOWNGRADE FROM A MAJOR PD AMENDMENT TO THAT OF A | | | MINOR PD AMENDMENT, AS THERE ARE NO CHANGES TO TOTAL | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ANY BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURES ONSITE, | | | NO CHANGES TO PD BOUNDARIES, OR CHANGES IN PD | | | CONDITIONS. | | | | | | 2. STAFF HAS CONCERNS WITH THE ADDITIONAL DROP-OFF | | | LOCATION ALONG TRINITY PL. WITHIN PUBLIC LAND. THE | | | PROPOSED DROP-OFF REQUIRES AND ENCROACHES SIGNIFICANTLY | | | INTO CITY-OWNED LAND. IT WILL SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACT | | | GREENSPACE ALONG FLAGLER DR. FOR THE USE OF AN EXTRA | | | VEHICULAR DROP-OFF. | | | | | | CONVEYANCE OR USE OF THE CITY-OWNED LAND FOR THE | | | DROP-OFF WILL REQUIRE SIGNIFICANT IMPROVEMENTS TO THE | | | SURROUNDING GREENSPACE AND PUBLIC REALM ALONG BOTH THE | | | ROW OF TRINITY PL. AND FLAGLER DR. TO COMPENSATE FOR | | | THE NEGATIVE IMPACT OF THE ADDITIONAL DROP-OFF AREA. | | | THESE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL INCLUDE ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING | | | (STREET TREES, PLANTINGS, ETC.) SEATING, AND PEDESTRIAN | | | IMPROVEMENTS. | | | | | | 3. WITH THE REMOVAL OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE ON CORNER | | | OF TRINITY PL. AND CHASE ST., STAFF IS CONCERNED WITH | | | THE REDUCED CHANCE FOR ACTIVITY ON THE GROUND LEVEL OF | | | TRINITY PL. WHAT IS GOING ON WITHIN THIS SPACE? | | | A. SHEET C4.02 SHOWS ENTRANCES ON THE SIDEWALK AND | | | CORNER SIDE, THESE CANNOT BE ACCESSED FROM THE TRINITY | | | PL. SIDEWALK. | | | | | | 4. "WATER WELL FOR COOLING SYSTEM" VAULT SHOWN IN | | | SIDEWALK/ROW. NOTE CLAIMS TO PUT THIS VAULT AT GRADE, | | | PLANS ALSO SHOW 3'-7" OF CLEARANCE ON THE SIDEWALK. | | | WILL VAULT IMPEDE PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC ON THE SIDEWALK, | | | PLEASE CLARIFY? | | | | | | 5. END OF DROP-OFF WHERE TRINITY PL. MEETS FLAGLER DR. | | | WILL REQUIRE AN ALTERATION TO THE EGRESS TO | | | DISCOURAGE/PREVENT ENTRANCE FROM SOUTHBOUND CARS ALONG | | | FLAGLER DR. THE TRINITY PL. EXIT REQUIRES SIGNAGE FOR | | | STRAIGHT AND RIGHT TURN ONLY, WITH THE ADDITION OF A NO | | | ENTRY SIGN ON FLAGLER DR. | | | | | | 6. MINIMUM WIDTH OF TWO-WAY SHALL BE 18'. PLEASE | | | INCREASE AREA AROUND DROP-OFF TO BE 18' IN WIDTH AT A | | | MINIMUM PLUS THE SIDE GUTTERS. | | | | | | 7. WHAT IS HAPPENING THE WITH FDC CONNECTION WITHIN THE | | | TRIANGULAR SECTION OF GREENSPACE BETWEEN TRINITY PL. | | | AND FLAGLER DR.? IS THIS BEING RELOCATED? PLEASE | | | CLARIFY. | | | | | | 8. PLEASE MODIFY OR REALIGN THE EXISTING PEDESTRIAN | | | PATH FROM TRINITY PARK, ADJUST IT TO BE PERPENDICULAR | | | TO THE SOUTHERN SIDEWALK ALONG TRINITY PL (MAKING A | | | MORE DIRECT/SHORTER PEDESTRIAN CROSSING OVER THE | | | TRAVEL/DROP-OFF LANES). | | | | | | 9. ADDITION OF A SIDEWALK ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TRINITY | | | PLACE WITH ADDITIONAL STREET TREES. | | | | | | 10. PLEASE CONFIRM ALL RESTAURANT SEATING IS OUTDOORS, | | | NOT ENCLOSED, AND NOT UNDER AC. | | | | | | 11. IS THE BUILDING COLOR PROPOSED TO BE CHANGED FROM | | | THE EXISTING PINK? RENDERS SEEM TO SUGGEST CHANGE. | | | | | | 12. PLEASE PROVIDE FDOT APPROVAL FOR THE STREETSCAPE | | | CHANGES ALONG LAKEVIEW AVE. | | | | | | 13. A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY SHALL BE | | | APPROVED ASSIGNING THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS, AND | | | ASSIGNS THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE | | | ENTIRE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SITE AND THE SUBSEQUENT | | | PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY, LANDSCAPING, AND IRRIGATION AS | | | PART OF THE PROPOSED CHANGES. | | | | | | 14. THE PLANTERS SCREENING THE GARAGE FACADE SHALL BE | | | RESTORED WITH PLANT MATERIAL. | | | | | | 15. WILL HAVE TO COORDINATE IN THE FUTURE WITH SPECIAL | | | EVENTS IN REGARDS TO TRINITY PL. ACCESS AND | | | CIRCULATION, ESPECIALLY DURING THE PB BOAT SHOW AND | | | SUNFEST. | | | | | | | | | CHRIS KIMMERLY | | | [email protected] | | | 822-1426 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-08-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
07-08-2021 |
Time |
12:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
06-08-2021 |
Time |
12:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-07-08 12:46:23 | 1. FURTHER DISCUSSIONS ARE NECESSARY REGARDING THE | | | APPLICANTS PROPOSAL TO CONVERT GREEN SPACE INTO A | | | VEHICULAR USE AREA. | | | 2. PROPOSED ADDITION WILL RESULT IN THE NEW BUILDING | | | FRONTAGE TO BE SETBACK ONLY 9 FEET FROM THE BACK OF | | | CURB OF TRINITY PLACE. DESPITE TRINITY PLACE IS A | | | PRIVATE ROAD, IT IS PERCEIVED BY THE PUBLIC AS A PUBLIC | | | STREET. FURTHER DISCUSSIONS ARE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE | | | THE PEDESTRIAN CONDITIONS OF TRINITY PLACE (SHADE, | | | LIGHTING, SIDEWALK). | | | 3. PROPOSED GRADING DESIGN IS TAKING ALL THE WATER FROM | | | THE PHILLIPS POINT INTO THE TRINITY PARK AREA. PLEASE | | | IDENTIFY ANY EXISTING FLOODING ISSUES OR NEW FLOODING | | | THAT MAY BE GENERATED WITH THE NEW DESIGN. | | | 4. STAFF HAS CONCERNS WITH THE NEGATIVE IMPACT OF AN | | | ADDITIONAL DROP-OFF AREA. THE PROJECT ALREADY HAS AN | | | EXISTING DROP-OFF AREA ALONG LAKEVIEW AVENUE. WHY IS | | | NECESSARY TO HAVE TO DROP-OFF AREAS? CAN THE RESTAURANT | | | AND GYM FUNCTION WITH A ON-STREET DROP OFF AREA? | | | 5. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE BUILDING PROJECTION INDICATED | | | WEST OF THE GYM ENTRANCE AND ENCROACHING INTO THE | | | SIDEWALK. | | | 6. NEW FPL TRANSFORMER SHALL NOT BE LOCATED IN THE ONLY | | | LANDSCAPE PROVIDED ALONG CHASE STREET, AND EXISTING | | | DROP CURB SHALL BE REMOVED. | | | 7. PLEASE STUDY THE POSSIBILITY TO MAKE THE ADDITION | | | MORE COMPATIBLE WITH THE OVERALL BUILDING DESIGN. | | | 8. ANY NEW MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT LOCATED ON THE NEW ROOF | | | SHALL BE SCREENED WITH A WALL OR SCREEN AS TALL AS THE | | | EQUIPMENT. | | | 9. PROPOSAL IS REMOVING 10 FICUS TREES. MITIGATION | | | SHALL BE PROVIDED AND PROJECT SHALL INCLUDE SHADE TREES | | | TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF THE PUBLIC REALM. | | | 10. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR INCREASE IN LOS. | | | FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA | | | APONTE AT 561-822-1439. |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |