Plan Review Details - Project Z21050030
Plan Review Stops For Project Z21050030
Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No 1 Status N Date 07-09-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By scwelter Date 07-09-2021 Time 13:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By scwelter Date 07-09-2021 Time 13:55 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 07-07-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 07-07-2021 Time 20:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 07-07-2021 Time 20:23 Sent To  
Notes
2021-07-07 20:26:45DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS,
 FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS,
 GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE,
 SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 3. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
 WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
 HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
 OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
 CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 3 Status P Date 08-12-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 08-12-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 08-12-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-26-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 10-26-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 10-26-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-10-26 07:51:39COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENG.
 SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098 [email protected] :
 1. CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY
 SEWER ARE REQUIRED.
 2. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL , PLANS SHALL SHOW
 PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER,
 STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES, INCLUDING
 STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY
 SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, METERS, AND
 OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH
 BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES
 SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS,
 CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND
 MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER LINES. ALL
 AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PROFILE VIEW.
 DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN
 VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. ADDITIONALLY,
 PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
 ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
 FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 3. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL , CUT AND CAP
 UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY ABANDONED UTILITY
 LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY RIGHT OF WAY.
 4. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND
 NPDES NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.
 - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:
 - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS
 THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF
 DEVELOPMENT OR SALE; AND
 - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE
 STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A
 MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).
 - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF
 CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION
 THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL
 SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
 OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION. IF THE ENGINEERING PLANS DO
 NOT INCLUDE AN EROSION CONTROL PLAN, THEN THE
 CONTRACTOR SHOULD SUBMIT ONE PRIOR TO RECEIVING THE
 ENGINEERING PERMIT.
 5. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES
 OF PROPOSED AND EXISTING WATER AND SEWER WITHIN RIGHT
 OF WAY AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
 6. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING
 APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT
 SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING
 SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED
 LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
 7. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL CLEARLY SHOW ROAD
 RIGHT OF WAY.
 8. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN TRENCHING IN
 IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE 50
 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF
 PROPOSED TRENCH PER CURRENT CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL
 GC-8.
 9. PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING AND
 INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER
 (Z-XXXXXXXX).
  
 COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE
 SUPER., WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-494-2262 OR
 [email protected]:
 -IF MAINTENANCE IS NEEDED ON LIFT STATION OR FORCE
 MAIN, WHAT IS THE CONTACT INFORMATION FOR FPL (NAME,
 PHONE, EMAIL)?
 -WATER DEMAND DOCUMENT SAYS 92K GALLONS PEAK DAILY
 IRRIGATION, BUT 30K GALLONS PER WEEK. PLEASE VERIFY
 CALCULATIONS ARE CORRECT AT FORMAL ENGINEERING
 SUBMITTAL.
 -LIFT STATION REPORT SAYS IT WAS BASED ON 1840 FT OF 2
 INCH FM, BUT SOME SIZING WAS INCREASED TO 4 INCH.
 PLEASE VERIFY LIFT STATION WILL STILL FUNCTION
 PROPERLY.
 -PLANS CALLOUT POSSIBLE RECLAIM VALVE IN ROAD. THERE IS
 A LARGE RECLAIM WATER MAIN IN AREA. AT FORMAL
 ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE LOOK AT THE RECLAIM
 ASBUILTS AND SHOW ANY RECLAIM PIPING IN AREA.
 -4 INCH FORCE MAIN CANNOT BE SCH80 PVC. PLEASE UPDATE
 MATERIAL TYPE AT FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL.
  
 COMMENTS FROM MICHAEL TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, WPB
 PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-494-1047, [email protected] :
 -CALL OUT POINT OF SERVICE ON PLANS AS WELL AS DETAIL A
 .
 -SHOW FM AS ?PRIVATE? UNTIL CONNECTION WITH EXISTING
 CITY SYSTEM.
 -PROVIDE REFERENCE TO THE NEAREST MAJOR STREET/LANDMARK
 IN DETAIL A.
 -SHOW PROPOSED FM IN DETAIL A.
 -ADD NOTE TO ENSURE THAT ANY ROADWAY OR CONSTRUCTION
 RUNOFF IS INCLUDED IN THE MITIGATION PLAN.
 -WHO OWNS THE EXISTING 32? RCP WM? (MATCH LINE C TO D)
 -WHO OWNS THE EXISTING STORM PIPE? (MATCH LINE C TO D)
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS.
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-02-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 07-02-2021 Time   Rev Time  
Received By rrossano Date 07-02-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-07-02 12:17:151. THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF
 REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY
 AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND
 WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. TO VIEW
 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER
 ENGINEERING RELATED DOCUMENTS, CLICK HERE OR GO TO: HTT
 PS://WWW.WPB.ORG/GOVERNMENT/ENGINEERING/ENGINEERING-FOR
 MS-PERMITS-AND-APPLICATIONS .
 2. CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH,
 FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08, ADOPTED
 SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18) CHAPTER 90
 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. SEC. 90-7.
 POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER SERVICE
 FACILITIES OF THE CITY:
 THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
 BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
 BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
 3. AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
 MORE INFORMATION, CLICK HERE OR GO TO: HTTPS://WWW.WPB.
 ORG/GOVERNMENT/ENGINEERING/ENGINEERING-FORMS-PERMITS-AN
 D-APPLICATIONS .
 4. PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC
 RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF
 YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
 MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
 IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
 [email protected] OR 561-494-1040 FOR FURTHER
 ASSISTANCE.
 5. PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS
 OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES,
 INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND
 SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES,
 METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE
 SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING
 GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS,
 ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL
 INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER
 LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN
 VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
 PLEASE SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT
 MATERIAL. ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL
 EXISTING AND PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT,
 INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &
 TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL
 UTILITY CROSSINGS.
 6. CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY
 ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
 ROW.
 7. PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE
 DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB
 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION).
 8. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM
 AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE
 PER FAC 64E-8 FOR WATER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR SEWER.
 9. SHOW VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION INFORMATION
 (NAVD 88 AND NGVD 29).
 10. PLEASE ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY?S
 DOWNSTREAM LIFT STATION NUMBER.
 11. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND
 IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED
 AREAS.
 12. PLEASE LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE
 APPLICABLE.
 13. ON SHEET EKRA-02 1 OF 2 AND 2 OF 2, THERE IS A 2?
 PROPOSED FM. THE DETAIL SHOWS A PROPOSED 4? FM
 CONNECTING TO AN EXISTING 16? DIP FM. CLARIFY IF 2? OR
 4?.
 14. ON SHEET EKRA-02 1 OF 2 AND 2 OF 2, PLEASE LABEL
 LENGTH AND SIZE OF PROPOSED FM.
 15. ON ALL UTILITY PLAN SHEETS, PLEASE LABEL ?PROPOSED?
 OR ?EXISTING? FOR ALL WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD
 CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES,
 PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]:
  
 -VERIFY FPL WILL OWN AND MAINTAIN THE ENTIRETY OF THE
 PROPOSED 2 INCH FORCE MAIN.
 -SHOW AND LABEL WELL AND LIFT STATION ON SITE PLAN.
 -FPL MUST COMPLY WITH WPB UTILITY BILLING REQUIREMENTS
 FOR WASTEWATER.
 -WILL WELL BE USED FOR IRRIGATION AND ALSO FOR POTABLE
 WATER ON SITE?
  
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS.
 RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING
 SERVICES, (561) 494-1098 [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 10-15-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 10-15-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 10-15-2021 Time 15:03 Sent To  
Notes
2021-10-15 15:06:02REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 THIS MAY NOT REPRESENT FIRE'S FINAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL
 AS ANY FUTURE SUBMITTALS WILL BE REVIEWED AS
 APPLICABLE.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 [email protected]
 561-312-1021
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-06-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 07-06-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 07-06-2021 Time 10:31 Sent To  
Notes
2021-07-06 10:53:19FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED; HOEVER, THE
 FOLLOWING COMMENTS REQUIRE ATTENTIONAND CORRECTION.
  
 FIRE'S REVIEW OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES NOT
 CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW.
  
  
 1. THERE IS AN INDICATION OF A TURNAROUND WITH A 75'
 DDIMENSION.
  
 A TURNAROUND IS REQUIRED; HOWEVER, THE MIN. DIMESION IS
 96' WITH A 28' RADIUS.
  
 PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT.
  
  
 2. THERE ARE INDICATIONS OF GATE ENTRANCE/EGRESS,
  
 IT IS RECOMMENDED, NOR REQUIRED, FOR EMERGENCY ACCESS
 AND SITE SECURITY, THAT IF THE GATE IS ELECTRONIC OPEN,
 A KNOX KEYSWITCH BE PROVIDED. FOR CHAIN AND LOCK GATE
 SECURITY THAT A KNOX PADLOCK BE PROVIDED.
  
 IN THE EVENT OF AN EMERGENCY INCIDENT, FIRE CREWS WILL
 NOT BE ABLE TO RELOCK/SECURE A BREECHED ELECTRIC GATE
 NOR A CUT CHAIN OR LOCK.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OR THAT
 NIETHER WILL BE PROVIDED.
  
  
 3. FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS, IF
 APPLICABLE, AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND
 STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 09-27-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 09-27-2022 Time 14:03 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 09-27-2022 Time 14:02 Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-27 14:03:28FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 47TH PL N FPL SUBSTATION ISPR 21-08 Z21050030
 SEPTEMBER 27, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
 1. SATISFIED. ON TREE SURVEY THE TREE DISPOSITION CHART
 COULD NOT BE FOUND. A DETAILED LIST DESCRIBING SPECIES
 , CONDITION AND DIAMETER BREAST HEIGHT FOR EACH TREE
 PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED.
 A. THE SURVEY SHOWS TREES MARKED WITH SYMBOLS FOR PINE
 TREE WITHIN THE ACCESS EASEMENT AREA AND PROPOSED AREA
 OF INITIAL CLEARING. ALL TREES NEED TO BE IDENTIFIED ON
 A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN AND LIST FOR THE ENTIRE
 EASEMENT AREA.
 B. THE EASEMENT AGREEMENT SHOULD BE AMENDED TO INDICATE
 HOW FUTURE TREE REMOVALS AND CLEARING SHALL BE
 PERMITTED IF IT IS NOT ALL GOING TO HAPPEN WITH THE
 INITIAL SUBSTATION CONSTRUCTION AND PERMITTING.
 C. REMOVAL OR TRIMMING OF AUSTRALIAN PINES ALONG THE
 ACCESS ROAD THAT IS PROPOSED TO BE PAVED AT 20 FEET
 WIDE SHOULD ALSO BE INDICATED ON THE TREE DISPOSITION
 PLAN.
 D. THE CITY WOULD REQUEST TO HAVE ALL INVASIVE EXOTICS
 REMOVED WITHIN THE EASEMENT AREA PER SECTION
 94-448(F)(11) AND CITY POLICY 10-2. INVASIVE EXOTIC
 SPECIES NEED TO BE IDENTIFIED AND A REMOVAL PLAN MUST
 BE SUBMITTED AT THIS TIME.
  
  
 2. SATISFIED. NATIVE TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION
 MUST BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. 94-448 3.
 INVESTIGATING IF MITIGATION OPTIONS ARE ABLE TO BE
 COMBINED WITH PUBLIC UTILITIES WETLAND MITIGATION.
 (ANDREW BURNETT 561-822-1562 REVIEW 7/8/21 FPL KRAKEN
 PLAN #Z21050030)
  
 SLASH PINES CANNOT BE RELOCATED SO WOULD BE ANTICIPATED
 TO REQUIRE MITIGATION.
 SABAL PALMS WOULD BE RELOCATED. MITIGATION AND
 RELOCATION CAN BE PROVIDED ANYWHERE WITHIN THE CITY
 OWNED PARCEL AND MAY BE COMBINED AS PART OF WETLAND
 MITIGATION.
  
 8/12/22 THE 23 SABAL PALMS SHOWN IN GOOD CONDITION MUST
 BE RELOCATED.
 SHOW AS RELOCATES INSTEAD OF REMOVAL AND SHOW FINAL
 LOCATIONS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND INCLUDE ON THE
 PLANT LIST. THIS LESSENS THE MITIGATION BY 2400 SQ FT.
 IF THERE IS ANOTHER REASON FOR REMOVAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 IT.
  
  
  
  
 TOTAL MITIGATION DUE 14,116 + 4,226 = 18,342 SQ FT.
  
 WITHOUT THE SABAL PALMS, AND IF NO MITIGATION TREES ARE
 BEING PROVIDED, THE PAYMENT IN LIEU OPTION WOULD BE
 $30, 570.00
  
  
 TOTAL MITIGATION DUE 14,916 SQ FT
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 08-12-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 08-12-2022 Time 15:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 08-12-2022 Time 15:35 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-12 15:36:23FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 47TH PL N FPL SUBSTATION ISPR 21-08 Z21050030
 AUGUST 12, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
 1. SATISFIED. ON TREE SURVEY THE TREE DISPOSITION CHART
 COULD NOT BE FOUND. A DETAILED LIST DESCRIBING SPECIES
 , CONDITION AND DIAMETER BREAST HEIGHT FOR EACH TREE
 PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED.
 A. THE SURVEY SHOWS TREES MARKED WITH SYMBOLS FOR PINE
 TREE WITHIN THE ACCESS EASEMENT AREA AND PROPOSED AREA
 OF INITIAL CLEARING. ALL TREES NEED TO BE IDENTIFIED ON
 A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN AND LIST FOR THE ENTIRE
 EASEMENT AREA.
 B. THE EASEMENT AGREEMENT SHOULD BE AMENDED TO INDICATE
 HOW FUTURE TREE REMOVALS AND CLEARING SHALL BE
 PERMITTED IF IT IS NOT ALL GOING TO HAPPEN WITH THE
 INITIAL SUBSTATION CONSTRUCTION AND PERMITTING.
 C. REMOVAL OR TRIMMING OF AUSTRALIAN PINES ALONG THE
 ACCESS ROAD THAT IS PROPOSED TO BE PAVED AT 20 FEET
 WIDE SHOULD ALSO BE INDICATED ON THE TREE DISPOSITION
 PLAN.
 D. THE CITY WOULD REQUEST TO HAVE ALL INVASIVE EXOTICS
 REMOVED WITHIN THE EASEMENT AREA PER SECTION
 94-448(F)(11) AND CITY POLICY 10-2. INVASIVE EXOTIC
 SPECIES NEED TO BE IDENTIFIED AND A REMOVAL PLAN MUST
 BE SUBMITTED AT THIS TIME.
  
  
 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. NATIVE TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD
 CONDITION MUST BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED.
 94-448 3. INVESTIGATING IF MITIGATION OPTIONS ARE ABLE
 TO BE COMBINED WITH PUBLIC UTILITIES WETLAND
 MITIGATION.
 (ANDREW BURNETT 561-822-1562 REVIEW 7/8/21 FPL KRAKEN
 PLAN #Z21050030)
  
 SLASH PINES CANNOT BE RELOCATED SO WOULD BE ANTICIPATED
 TO REQUIRE MITIGATION.
 SABAL PALMS WOULD BE RELOCATED. MITIGATION AND
 RELOCATION CAN BE PROVIDED ANYWHERE WITHIN THE CITY
 OWNED PARCEL AND MAY BE COMBINED AS PART OF WETLAND
 MITIGATION.
  
 8/12/22 THE 23 SABAL PALMS SHOWN IN GOOD CONDITION MUST
 BE RELOCATED.
 SHOW AS RELOCATES INSTEAD OF REMOVAL AND SHOW FINAL
 LOCATIONS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND INCLUDE ON THE
 PLANT LIST. THIS LESSENS THE MITIGATION BY 2400 SQ FT.
 IF THERE IS ANOTHER REASON FOR REMOVAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 IT.
  
  
  
  
 TOTAL MITIGATION DUE 14,116 + 4,226 = 18,342 SQ FT.
  
 WITHOUT THE SABAL PALMS, AND IF NO MITIGATION TREES ARE
 BEING PROVIDED, THE PAYMENT IN LIEU OPTION WOULD BE
 $30, 570.00
  
  
  
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-22-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 10-22-2021 Time 10:18 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 10-22-2021 Time 10:18 Sent To  
Notes
2021-10-22 10:19:42FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 47TH PL N FPL SUBSTATION ISPR 21-08 Z21050030
 OCTOBER 19, 2021
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
 1. NOT SATISFIED. ON TREE SURVEY THE TREE DISPOSITION
 CHART COULD NOT BE FOUND. A DETAILED LIST DESCRIBING
 SPECIES , CONDITION AND DIAMETER BREAST HEIGHT FOR EACH
 TREE PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED.
 THE SURVEY SHOWS TREES MARKED WITH SYMBOLS FOR PINE
 TREE WITHIN THE ACCESS EASEMENT AREA AND PROPOSED AREA
 OF INITIAL CLEARING. ALL TREES NEED TO BE IDENTIFIED ON
 A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN AND LIST FOR THE ENTIRE
 EASEMENT AREA. THE EASEMENT AGREEMENT SHOULD BE AMENDED
 TO INDICATE HOW FUTURE TREE REMOVALS AND CLEARING SHALL
 BE PERMITTED IF IT IS NOT ALL GOING TO HAPPEN WITH THE
 INITIAL SUBSTATION CONSTRUCTION AND PERMITTING.
 REMOVAL OR TRIMMING OF AUSTRALIAN PINES ALONG THE
 ACCESS ROAD THAT IS PROPOSED TO BE PAVED AT 20 FEET
 WIDE SHOULD ALSO BE INDICATED ON THE TREE DISPOSITION
 PLAN.
 THE CITY WOULD REQUEST TO HAVE ALL INVASIVE EXOTICS
 REMOVED WITHIN THE EASEMENT AREA PER SECTION
 94-448(F)(11) AND CITY POLICY 10-2. INVASIVE EXOTIC
 SPECIES NEED TO BE IDENTIFIED AND A REMOVAL PLAN MUST
 BE SUBMITTED AT THIS TIME.
  
  
 2. NOT SATISFIED. NATIVE TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD
 CONDITION MUST BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED.
 94-448 3. INVESTIGATING IF MITIGATION OPTIONS ARE ABLE
 TO BE COMBINED WITH PUBLIC UTILITIES WETLAND
 MITIGATION.
 SLASH PINES CANNOT BE RELOCATED SO WOULD BE ANTICIPATED
 TO REQUIRE MITIGATION.
 SABAL PALMS WOULD BE RELOCATED. MITIGATION AND
 RELOCATION CAN BE PROVIDED ANYWHERE WITHIN THE CITY
 OWNED PARCEL AND MAY BE COMBINED AS PART OF WETLAND
 MITIGATION.
  
 (ANDREW BURNETT 561-822-1562 REVIEW 7/8/21 FPL KRAKEN
 PLAN #Z21050030)
  
  
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-06-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By aburnett Date 07-06-2021 Time 16:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aburnett Date 07-06-2021 Time 16:01 Sent To  
Notes
2021-07-06 16:02:44ANDREW BURNETT
 561-822-1562
 REVIEW 7/8/21
 FPL KRAKEN PLAN #Z21050030
  
 1. ON TREE SURVEY THE TREE DISPOSITION CHART COULD NOT
 BE FOUND. A DETAILED LIST DESCRIBING SPECIES ,
 CONDITION AND DIAMETER BREAST HEIGHT FOR EACH TREE
 PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED.
  
 2. NATIVE TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION MUST BE
 PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. 94-448 3. INVESTIGATING
 IF MITIGATION OPTIONS ARE ABLE TO BE COMBINED WITH
 PUBLIC UTILITIES WETLAND MITIGATION. .
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 1 Status P Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By mtechnow Date 08-23-2022 Time 11:49 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-23 11:56:47FOR ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL: PLEASE NOTE COVER AS 36" ON
 FM PROFILE. THERE IS A DISCREPANCY ON THE CALL OUTS.
Review Stop PU-CS PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SRVC
Rev No 1 Status P Date 08-05-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By mhurley Date 08-05-2022 Time 15:52 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mhurley Date 08-05-2022 Time 15:50 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-05 15:51:49NO FURTHER REVIEW COMMENTS UNTIL ENGINEERING
 DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL.
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status P Date 06-24-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 06-24-2021 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 06-24-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-06-24 12:57:05NO OBJECTION FROM PUBLIC WORKS.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 4 Status P Date 09-30-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 09-30-2022 Time 10:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 09-30-2022 Time 10:05 Sent To  
Notes
2022-09-30 10:05:47NO COMMENTS ON THE 9/14/2022 SUBMITTAL.
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 3 Status P Date 08-23-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 08-23-2022 Time 09:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 08-23-2022 Time 10:00 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-23 09:59:11THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 7/26/2022 SUBMITTAL. THEY CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH THE
 ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 1. CROSS SECTIONS REFERENCE PAGES NEED TO BE UPDATED
 FROM "2 OF 5" TO "3 OF 7".
  
 2. LIST THE VERTICAL DATUM AND CONVERSION TO NGVD1929
 ON SHEETS 1 OF 2 AND 2 OF 2 (E-KRA01J). THERE IS A
 STANDING WATER ELEVATION LISTED ON THE PAGES.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status F Date 12-07-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 12-07-2021 Time 14:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 12-07-2021 Time 16:34 Sent To  
Notes
2021-12-07 16:34:33THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 10/14/2021 SUBMITTAL:
  
  
 1. [SATISFIED] ON THE OVERALL SITE PLAN (SHEET 1 OF 2),
 SHOULD THE LABEL 'EGRET LAKE ELEMENTARY' ABOVE STA22+00
 BE MOVED TO ABOVE STA41+00?
  
 2. [NOT SATISFIED] EVERY SHEET WITH ELEVATION
 INFORMATION WILL NEED THE VERTICAL DATUM LISTED ALONG
 WITH THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929. {PREVIOUS
 COMMENT: THE CITY'S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM PER CITY
 CODE IS NGVD1929. THE CITY IS ALLOWING SURVEYS AND
 PLANS TO USE NAVD1988 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION EQUATION
 BETWEEN NAVD1988 AND NGVD1929 IS ALSO PROVIDED. LABEL
 THE VERTICAL DATUM AND CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929
 ON ALL CIVIL ENGINEERING SHEETS WITH ELEVATION
 INFORMATION.}
  
 3. [SATISFIED] FOR SECTION A-A ON SHEET 3 OF 7,
 CONSIDER CHANGING THE NOTE 'ALL SLOPES GREATER THAN 5:1
 TO BE SODDED' TO 'ALL SLOPES FLATTER THAN 5:1 TO BE
 SODDED' (OR STEEPER DEPENDING ON THE INTENT OF THE
 NOTE).
  
 4. [SATISFIED FOR NOW. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WILL BE
 REVIEWED WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.] THE
 BOTTOM ELEVATION OF THE ROADSIDE SWALES VARY BETWEEN
 13.5 AND 15.8 ALONG THE ROAD. WAS THIS VARIATION
 CONSIDERED IN THE SWALE STORAGE VOLUME FOR WATER
 QUALITY TREATMENT? WILL THERE BE DITCH BLOCKS
 CONSTRUCTED TO MAXIMIZE THE STORAGE IN THE SWALE? THE
 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED AT ENGINEERING
 PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 5. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] REVIEW THE DISCHARGE LOCATION
 FOR THE SWALES EAST OF THE EXISTING FENCE/GATE CROSSING
 THE R/W AT APPROXIMATE STA39+00. THERE ARE PRIVATE
 PARCELS (SOME DEVELOPED) ADJACENT TO THE R/W. {PREVIOUS
 COMMENT: HOW AND WHERE WILL THE ROADSIDE SWALES
 DISCHARGE? THERE APPEARS TO BE A BERM ALONG THE NORTH
 SIDE OF THE EXISTING DITCH EAST OF STA11+00. WILL THE
 TOP OF THE BERM BE AFFECTED WITH THE ROAD
 CONSTRUCTION?}
  
 6. [SATISFIED - THIS PIPE IS THE RESPONSIBILTY OF THE
 SCHOOL DISTRICT.] PROVIDE CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE
 STORM PIPE(S) CROSSED BY THE PROPOSED ROAD (APPROX.
 STA39+00).
  
 7. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] WEIR ELEVATION OF NEW CONTROL
 STRUCTURE (IN THE DETENTION AREA) IS 19.50 FEET NAVD.
 THE DIMENSIONS IN THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH DETAIL WILL
 PROVIDE TOP OF TRENCH ELEVATIONS BETWEEN 19.70 FEET
 NAVD AND 20.10 FT NAVD, WHICH IS HIGHER THAN THE WEIR
 ELEVATION AND THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH WILL NOT BE FULLY
 SURCHARGED. {PREVIOUS COMMENT: CHECK THE ELEVATIONS
 LISTED FOR THE FRENCH DRAIN DETAIL ON SHEET 3 OF 7 AND
 THE DRAINAGE CONTROL STRUCTURE DSC-1 DETAIL ON SHEET 4
 OF 7.}
  
 8. [SATISFIED - MAY WANT TO CONSIDER CRUSHED CONCRETE
 AS ROAD BASE MATERIAL IN ADDITION TO SOIL CEMENT]
 LIMEROCK MAY NOT BE SUITABLE FOR THE ROAD BASE IF IT
 WILL BE SUSCEPTIBLE TO SATURATION FROM THE HIGH GROUND
 WATER TABLE AND/OR SWALE STORAGE.
  
 NEW COMMENTS (THESE MAYBE ADDRESSED DURING ENGINEERING
 PERMIT SUBMITTAL);
 9. CONSIDER PLACING GEOTEXTILE (SOILED FILLED CELLS,
 ETC.) ACROSS THE WEIR AND THE OUTSIDE SLOPE OF THE
 DETENTION AREA TO PROTECT AGAINST EROSION.
  
 10. NOTE 3 ON SHEET 1 OF 2 FOR THE SEWER LIFT STATION
 LISTS THE SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE ELEVATION AS 0.0'
 NAVD.
  
 11. SHEET 1 OF 7 (FENCE FILL AND GRADE PLAN SHEET)
 LISTS THE FFE ELEVATION OF THE RELAY VAULT AS 22.17 FT
 NAVD. THE SECTION THRU SEPTIC TANK SYSTEM DETAIL ON
 SHEET 1 OF 2 (WATER LINE CONNECTION AND SEWER LIFT
 STATION DETAILS SHEET) CALLS OUT MIN. 1% SLOPE FOR THE
 4" LATERAL.
  
 12. SHEET 1 OF 7 (FENCE FILL AND GRADE PLAN SHEET)
 CALLS OUT MIN. 2% SLOPE (1/4 INCH PER FOOT) FOR THE
 4-INCH SEWER LATERAL.. THE SECTION THRU SEPTIC TANK
 SYSTEM DETAIL ON SHEET 1 OF 2 (WATER LINE CONNECTION
 AND SEWER LIFT STATION DETAILS SHEET) CALLS OUT THE
 FINISHED LFOOR ELEVATION OF 21.70 FT NAVD FOR THE
 SUBSTATION RELAY VAULT.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-08-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 07-08-2021 Time 10:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 07-08-2021 Time 10:39 Sent To  
Notes
2021-07-08 10:39:30THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. ON THE OVERALL SITE PLAN (SHEET 1 OF 2), SHOULD THE
 LABEL ?EGRET LAKE ELEMENTARY? ABOVE STA22+00 BE MOVED
 TO ABOVE STA41+00?
  
 2. THE CITY?S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM PER CITY CODE IS
 NGVD1929. THE CITY IS ALLOWING SURVEYS AND PLANS TO USE
 NAVD1988 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION EQUATION BETWEEN
 NAVD1988 AND NGVD1929 IS ALSO PROVIDED. LABEL THE
 VERTICAL DATUM AND CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 ON
 ALL CIVIL ENGINEERING SHEETS WITH ELEVATION
 INFORMATION.
  
 3. FOR SECTION A-A ON SHEET 3 OF 7, CONSIDER CHANGING
 THE NOTE ?ALL SLOPES GREATER THAN 5:1 TO BE SODDED? TO
 ?ALL SLOPES FLATTER THAN 5:1 TO BE SODDED? (OR STEEPER
 DEPENDING ON THE INTENT OF THE NOTE).
  
 4. THE BOTTOM ELEVATION OF THE ROADSIDE SWALES VARY
 BETWEEN 13.5 AND 15.8 ALONG THE ROAD. WAS THIS
 VARIATION CONSIDERED IN THE SWALE STORAGE VOLUME FOR
 WATER QUALITY TREATMENT? WILL THERE BE DITCH BLOCKS
 CONSTRUCTED TO MAXIMIZE THE STORAGE IN THE SWALE? THE
 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED AT ENGINEERING
 PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 5. HOW AND WHERE WILL THE ROADSIDE SWALES DISCHARGE?
 THERE APPEARS TO BE A BERM ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF THE
 EXISTING DITCH EAST OF STA11+00. WILL THE TOP OF THE
 BERM BE AFFECTED WITH THE ROAD CONSTRUCTION?
  
 6. PROVIDE CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE STORM PIPE(S)
 CROSSED BY THE PROPOSED ROAD (APPROX. STA39+00).
  
 7. CHECK THE ELEVATIONS LISTED FOR THE FRENCH DRAIN
 DETAIL ON SHEET 3 OF 7 AND THE DRAINAGE CONTROL
 STRUCTURE DSC-1 DETAIL ON SHEET 4 OF 7.
  
 8. LIMEROCK MAY NOT BE SUITABLE FOR THE ROAD BASE IF IT
 WILL BE SUSCEPTIBLE TO SATURATION FROM THE HIGH GROUND
 WATER TABLE AND/OR SWALE STORAGE.
  
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
  
 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED
 WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 3. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP PERMIT(S) BEFORE START OF
 CONSTRUCTION.
  
 4. THE PROJECT IS WITHIN THE NORTHERN PALM BEACH COUNTY
 IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE NPBCID
 PERMIT BEFORE THE START OF CONSTRUCTION.
  
 5. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WITH THE
 ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 08-12-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 08-12-2022 Time 10:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-26-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 10-26-2021 Time 11:19 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-10-26 11:23:441. AGREEMENTS ARE STILL BEING FINALIZED.
 2. PROPOSED PAVING STOPS AT EXISTING GATE WHICH IS 225'
 +/- WEST OF EXISTING END OF PAVEMENT. EXTEND PAVING
 EAST TO EXISTING PAVEMENT.
 3. PROPOSED FORCE MAIN IN 47TH PLACE N. WILL ALL BE
 PRIVATE. LABEL AS SAME.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-06-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 07-06-2021 Time 08:57 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-07-06 09:04:421. PLANS HAVE BEEN SENT TO WATER RESOURCES FOR THEIR
 REVIEW.
 2. EAST END OF PROPOSED ROADWAY IS CALLED OUT AS 12' WD
 INSTEAD OF 20'.
 3. EASEMENT AND MOU AGREEMENT WILL NEED TO BE FINALIZED
 PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 08-03-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 08-03-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-03 09:36:41APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION: PROVIDE COUNTY
 TPS LETTER ONCE RECEIVED/AVAILABLE
  
 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER. THE TRAFFIC
 STATEMENT NEEDS TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY A
 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, EXACT NUMBER OF TRIPS GENERATED
 NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED BASED ON EITHER COUNTY OR ITE TRIP
 GENERATION MANUAL RATES.
 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK AND SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES
 CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A
 SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-15-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 10-15-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-10-15 15:34:311) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER. THE
 TRAFFIC STATEMENT NEEDS TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY A
 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, EXACT NUMBER OF TRIPS GENERATED
 NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED BASED ON EITHER COUNTY OR ITE TRIP
 GENERATION MANUAL RATES.
 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK AND SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES
 CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A
 SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-07-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 07-07-2021 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-07-07 17:07:11TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER.
  
 SITE COMMENTS
 1) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND
 SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES CLEARLY
 DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE
 FILE/DRAWING
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 08-12-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 08-12-2022 Time 10:00 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 08-12-2022 Time 09:48 Sent To  
Notes
2022-08-12 10:00:51PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 08.12.2022
 PROJECT NO.: Z21050030
 CASE NO.: ISPR 21-08
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. [ SATISFIED ] - AS REQUIRED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION:
  
  1.1. [ SATISFIED ] - A JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT SHALL
 BE PROVIDED.
  
  1.2. [ SATISFIED ] - OWNER?S CONSENT FORM (SIGNED /
 NOTARIZED) SHALL BE PROVIDED ? IT IS STAFF?S
 UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS IS BEING COORDINATED WITH THE
 LEASE, WHICH HAS NOT BEEN FINALIZED.
  
 2. [ SATISFIED - STAFF WILL ADDRESS AS NEEDED ] - STAFF
 IS LOOKING INTO SOME POSSIBLE INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN
 THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND THE
 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REGARDING THE ALLOWANCE OF UTILITY
 FACILITIES IN THE CONSERVATION (CON) FUTURE LAND USE
 DESIGNATION. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WILL BE PROVIDED IN
 THE NEAR FUTURE.
  
 3. [ SATISFIED ] - INSTEAD OF USING THE TERM ?PROPERTY
 LINE? IT SHOULD BE IDENTIFIED AS A ?LEASE LINE?.
  
 4. [ SATISFIED - PROVISION BEING ADDED INTO THE LEASE
 AGREEMENT ] - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-273 OF THE CITY?S
 ZLDRS, UTILITY FACILITIES ARE REQUIRED TO BE LANDSCAPED
 TO MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. WHILE IT DOES NOT
 MAKE SENSE TO INSTALL LANDSCAPING AT THIS TIME GIVEN
 ITS LOCATION AND SURROUNDINGS, BUT IS THERE ANY WAY
 THAT ENSURE THAT THE LANDSCAPING WOULD BE INSTALLED IF
 THE SURROUNDING AREA IS EVER DEVELOPED? AS CURRENTLY
 DESIGNATED ON THE CITY?S FUTURE LAND USE MAP, THE AREA
 IMMEDIATELY EAST OF THE TRANSMISSION CORRIDOR IS
 DESIGNATED AS SINGLE FAMILY.
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) ELECTRONIC COPIES OF ALL REVISED PLANS AND/OR
 DOCUMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 12-03-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 12-03-2021 Time 11:21 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 12-03-2021 Time 11:20 Sent To  
Notes
2021-12-03 11:22:49PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 12.03.2021
 PROJECT NO.: Z21050030
 CASE NO.: ISPR 21-08
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - AS REQUIRED BY THE
 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION:
  
  1.1. [ SATISFIED ] - A JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT SHALL
 BE PROVIDED.
  
  1.2. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - OWNER?S CONSENT FORM (SIGNED
 / NOTARIZED) SHALL BE PROVIDED ? IT IS STAFF?S
 UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS IS BEING COORDINATED WITH THE
 LEASE, WHICH HAS NOT BEEN FINALIZED.
  
 2. [ SATISFIED - STAFF WILL ADDRESS AS NEEDED ] - STAFF
 IS LOOKING INTO SOME POSSIBLE INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN
 THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND THE
 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REGARDING THE ALLOWANCE OF UTILITY
 FACILITIES IN THE CONSERVATION (CON) FUTURE LAND USE
 DESIGNATION. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WILL BE PROVIDED IN
 THE NEAR FUTURE.
  
 3. [ SATISFIED ] - INSTEAD OF USING THE TERM ?PROPERTY
 LINE? IT SHOULD BE IDENTIFIED AS A ?LEASE LINE?.
  
 4. [ SATISFIED - PROVISION BEING ADDED INTO THE LEASE
 AGREEMENT ] - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-273 OF THE CITY?S
 ZLDRS, UTILITY FACILITIES ARE REQUIRED TO BE LANDSCAPED
 TO MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. WHILE IT DOES NOT
 MAKE SENSE TO INSTALL LANDSCAPING AT THIS TIME GIVEN
 ITS LOCATION AND SURROUNDINGS, BUT IS THERE ANY WAY
 THAT ENSURE THAT THE LANDSCAPING WOULD BE INSTALLED IF
 THE SURROUNDING AREA IS EVER DEVELOPED? AS CURRENTLY
 DESIGNATED ON THE CITY?S FUTURE LAND USE MAP, THE AREA
 IMMEDIATELY EAST OF THE TRANSMISSION CORRIDOR IS
 DESIGNATED AS SINGLE FAMILY.
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) ELECTRONIC COPIES OF ALL REVISED PLANS AND/OR
 DOCUMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-08-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 07-08-2021 Time 12:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 07-08-2021 Time 12:32 Sent To  
Notes
2021-07-08 12:32:41PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 07.08.2021
 PROJECT NO.:
 CASE NO.: ISPR 21-08
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. AS REQUIRED BY THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION:
  
 1.1. A JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 1.2. OWNER?S CONSENT FORM (SIGNED / NOTARIZED) SHALL BE
 PROVIDED ? IT IS STAFF?S UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS IS
 BEING COORDINATED WITH THE LEASE, WHICH HAS NOT BEEN
 FINALIZED.
  
 2. STAFF IS LOOKING INTO SOME POSSIBLE INCONSISTENCIES
 BETWEEN THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND
 THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REGARDING THE ALLOWANCE OF
 UTILITY FACILITIES IN THE CONSERVATION (CON) FUTURE
 LAND USE DESIGNATION. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WILL BE
 PROVIDED IN THE NEAR FUTURE.
  
 3. INSTEAD OF USING THE TERM ?PROPERTY LINE? IT SHOULD
 BE IDENTIFIED AS A ?LEASE LINE?.
  
 4. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-273 OF THE CITY?S ZLDRS, UTILITY
 FACILITIES ARE REQUIRED TO BE LANDSCAPED TO MEET THE
 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. WHILE IT DOES NOT MAKE SENSE TO
 INSTALL LANDSCAPING AT THIS TIME GIVEN ITS LOCATION AND
 SURROUNDINGS, BUT IS THERE ANY WAY THAT ENSURE THAT THE
 LANDSCAPING WOULD BE INSTALLED IF THE SURROUNDING AREA
 IS EVER DEVELOPED? AS CURRENTLY DESIGNATED ON THE
 CITY?S FUTURE LAND USE MAP, THE AREA IMMEDIATELY EAST
 OF THE TRANSMISSION CORRIDOR IS DESIGNATED AS SINGLE
 FAMILY.
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) ELECTRONIC COPIES OF ALL REVISED PLANS AND/OR
 DOCUMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved