| Plan Review Stops For Project Z21050021 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-09-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
06-09-2021 |
Time |
20:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
06-09-2021 |
Time |
20:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-06-09 20:39:53 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | NO COMMENTS ON PROPOSED SITE PLAN FOR EV CHARGING | | | STATIONS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-17-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
08-17-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
08-17-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-02-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
06-02-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
06-02-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-06-02 09:54:42 | 1. PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY | | | OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC | | | RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF | | | YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE | | | MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL | | | IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT | | | [email protected] OR 561-494-1040 FOR FURTHER | | | ASSISTANCE. | | | 2. PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS | | | OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES, | | | INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND | | | SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, | | | METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE | | | SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING | | | GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, | | | ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL | | | INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER | | | LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE | | | PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN | | | VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. | | | PLEASE SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT | | | MATERIAL. ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL | | | EXISTING AND PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, | | | INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & | | | TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL | | | UTILITY CROSSINGS. | | | 3. PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE | | | DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB | | | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION). | | | 4. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND | | | IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED | | | AREAS. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY: | | | | | | -SHOW EXISTING WATER METER BOX AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY | | | NEAR SOUTH SIDE OF PROPERTY ON SITE PLAN AND CIVIL | | | PLANS. | | | | | | -PLEASE VERIFY HOW EXISTING WATER SERVICE IS CURRENTLY | | | USED, AND IF USE WILL CHANGE WITH PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | -DOES THE FPL PROPERTY CURRENTLY HAVE ANY EXISTING | | | SEWER LATERALS, AND WILL ANY NEW ONES BE NEEDED? | | | | | | -WILL THE CHARGING STATION NEEDED METERED DOMESTIC, | | | IRRIGATION, OR FIRE WATER SERVICE? | | | | | | -IF EXISTING WATER METER WILL REMAIN IN SAME LOCATION, | | | GRANT UTILITY EASEMENT FOR IT. | | | | | | -WILL THE METERED PARKING SPOTS ON DATURA REMAIN? | | | | | | -ON THE CIVIL PLANS, LABEL THE ROW OR CITY WPB PROPERTY | | | AT QUADRILLE PLAZA DR. | | | | | | -WILL THE PARKING SPOTS FIT THE DIMENSIONS OF THE NEW | | | ELECTRIC TRUCKS BEING PRODUCED SUCH AS THE FORD | | | LIGHTNING? | | | | | | -WHAT WILL THE EMPTY PAVED AREA ON WEST SIDE OF THE | | | CHARGING STATION AREA BE USED FOR? | | | | | | -THE FENCE ON WEST SIDE SAID REMOVEABLE. WHEN WOULD IT | | | BE REMOVED, AND WOULD A KEY BE NEEDED FOR REMOVAL? | | | | | | RESPECTFULLY, | | | MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-822-2262, | | | [email protected] | | | | | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | CONCERNS, THANKS. | | | RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES | | | DEPARTMENT, (561) 494-1098 [email protected] | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-09-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
06-09-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
06-09-2021 |
Time |
13:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-06-09 13:58:15 | FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES. | | | | | | FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES NOT | | | CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT THE | | | APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
11-10-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
11-10-2021 |
Time |
12:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
11-10-2021 |
Time |
12:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-11-10 12:56:00 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: FPL EV CHARGING 501 DATURA DMP-FSPR 21-02 | | | Z21050021 | | | NOVEMBER 8, 2021 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. RECOMMEND REMOVING GREEN WALLS TO | | | INCREASE PLANTING SPACE IN LANDSCAPE BUFFER PLANTING | | | BEDS LOCATED BETWEEN PARKING LOT AND PEDESTRIAN WALKS | | | ON THE EAST SIDE BUFFER. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. REPLACE/ IMPROVE PLANT MATERIAL IN | | | EXISTING PLANTING BEDS ON SOUTH SIDE OF PROPERTY ON | | | DATURA. | | | | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. ADD ADDITIONAL TREES / LANDSCAPE BEDS TO | | | THE DECORATIVE PAVEMENT POWERSTATION AREA CONTINUING | | | THE PLANTING THEME FROM THE SOUTHERN LANDSCAPE BUFFER | | | AROUND THE PARKING SPACES. PASS-THROUGH AREAS SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED FOR ACCESS TO THE SIDEWALK. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. EXTEND LANDSCAPE BUFFER FROM PARKING LOT | | | EXIT ALONG ALLEY TO QUADRILLE PLAZA. INCORPORATE SMALL | | | TREES IN BUFFER | | | | | | | | | ANDREW BURNETT | | | 561-822-1562 | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/20/21: | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-113(F)(2) OF THE DMP CODE | | | REQUIRES ALL NEW SURFACE PARKING TO PROVIDE THE | | | REQUIRED TERMINAL ISLAND LANDSCAPE AREA WITH THE | | | REQUIRED TREE. IF THIS CANNOT BE PROVIDED ON THE NORTH | | | END OF THE ROW OF PARKING, A VARIANCE MUST BE | | | REQUESTED. | | | | | | 6. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. THE PLAZA AREA IS LACKING | | | IN ANY PLANTINGS. THE JAMAICAN CAPER HEDGE IN THE RIGHT | | | OF WAY STREETSCAPE IS PROPOSED TO BE COMPLETELY | | | REMOVED. STAFF SUGGESTS ADDING PLANTINGS BACK AROUND | | | THE DECORATIVE HISTORIC COLUMNS TO KEEP TRAFFIC AWAY | | | FROM THEM AND ENHANCE THEM. PLANTINGS SHOULD EXTEND | | | ALONG EAST WALL OF THE ENCLOSURE ADJACENT TO THE COLUMN | | | AND THE MICRO MOBILITY AREA MOVED NORTH AWAY FROM THE | | | COLUMN. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR | | | THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE RIGHT OF WAY | | | LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR | | | THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING | | | AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE | | | MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | 4. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT FOR ANY | | | STRUCTURES, A LANDSCAPE PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH | | | PLANS REVISED TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS: | | | ? RELOCATE THE PROPOSED SIMPSON?S STOPPER TREE IN THE | | | SOUTH BUFFER IN CONFLICT WITH AN EXISTING UTILITY POLE. | | | | | | ? PLANT LIST ON SHEET LP-1 IS NOT ACCURATE. REMOVE FROM | | | SHEET LP-1 AND ONLY INCLUDE ACCURATE PLANT LIST ON | | | SHEET LP-2. | | | | | | ? REMOVE THE CREEPING FIG ON THE COLUMNS. IF THE VINES | | | WERE TO ATTACH TO THE DECORATIVE HISTORIC TILES THEY | | | COULD DAMAGE THE SURFACE. | | | | | | ? MICRO MOBILITY STATION WAS MOVED NORTH, PLANTINGS | | | ARE TO BE EXTENDED ALONG THE BUILDING WHERE A UTILITY | | | POLE AND TRASH RECEPTACLE BLOCK ACCESS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-23-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
08-23-2021 |
Time |
11:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
08-20-2021 |
Time |
15:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-08-23 11:59:33 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: FPL EV CHARGING 501 DATURA DMP-FSPR 21-02 | | | Z21050021 | | | AUGUST 20, 2021 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. RECOMMEND REMOVING GREEN WALLS TO | | | INCREASE PLANTING SPACE IN LANDSCAPE BUFFER PLANTING | | | BEDS LOCATED BETWEEN PARKING LOT AND PEDESTRIAN WALKS | | | ON THE EAST SIDE BUFFER. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. REPLACE/ IMPROVE PLANT MATERIAL IN | | | EXISTING PLANTING BEDS ON SOUTH SIDE OF PROPERTY ON | | | DATURA. | | | | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. ADD ADDITIONAL TREES / LANDSCAPE BEDS TO | | | THE DECORATIVE PAVEMENT POWERSTATION AREA CONTINUING | | | THE PLANTING THEME FROM THE SOUTHERN LANDSCAPE BUFFER | | | AROUND THE PARKING SPACES. PASS-THROUGH AREAS SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED FOR ACCESS TO THE SIDEWALK. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. EXTEND LANDSCAPE BUFFER FROM PARKING LOT | | | EXIT ALONG ALLEY TO QUADRILLE PLAZA. INCORPORATE SMALL | | | TREES IN BUFFER | | | | | | | | | ANDREW BURNETT | | | 561-822-1562 | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/20/21: | | | | | | 5. SECTION 94-113(F)(2) OF THE DMP CODE REQUIRES ALL | | | NEW SURFACE PARKING TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TERMINAL | | | ISLAND LANDSCAPE AREA WITH THE REQUIRED TREE. IF THIS | | | CANNOT BE PROVIDED ON THE NORTH END OF THE ROW OF | | | PARKING, A VARIANCE MUST BE REQUESTED. | | | | | | 6. THE PLAZA AREA IS LACKING IN ANY PLANTINGS. THE | | | JAMAICAN CAPER HEDGE IN THE RIGHT OF WAY STREETSCAPE IS | | | PROPOSED TO BE COMPLETELY REMOVED. STAFF SUGGESTS | | | ADDING PLANTINGS BACK AROUND THE DECORATIVE HISTORIC | | | COLUMNS TO KEEP TRAFFIC AWAY FROM THEM AND ENHANCE | | | THEM. PLANTINGS SHOULD EXTEND ALONG EAST WALL OF THE | | | ENCLOSURE ADJACENT TO THE COLUMN AND THE MICRO MOBILITY | | | AREA MOVED NORTH AWAY FROM THE COLUMN. | | | | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR | | | THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE RIGHT OF WAY | | | LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR | | | THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING | | | AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE | | | MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-04-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aburnett |
Date |
06-04-2021 |
Time |
16:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aburnett |
Date |
06-04-2021 |
Time |
16:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-06-04 16:01:16 | 1. RECOMMEND REMOVING GREEN WALLS TO INCREASE PLANTING | | | SPACE IN LANDSCAPE BUFFER PLANTING BEDS LOCATED BETWEEN | | | PARKING LOT AND PEDESTRIAN WALKS ON THE EAST SIDE | | | BUFFER. | | | 2. REPLACE/ IMPROVE PLANT MATERIAL IN EXISTING PLANTING | | | BEDS ON SOUTH SIDE OF PROPERTY ON DATURA. | | | 3. ADD ADDITIONAL TREES / LANDSCAPE BEDS TO THE | | | DECORATIVE PAVEMENT POWERSTATION AREA CONTINUING THE | | | PLANTING THEME FROM THE SOUTHERN LANDSCAPE BUFFER | | | AROUND THE PARKING SPACES. PASS-THROUGH AREAS SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED FOR ACCESS TO THE SIDEWALK. | | | 4. EXTEND LANDSCAPE BUFFER FROM PARKING LOT EXIT ALONG | | | ALLEY TO QUADRILLE PLAZA. INCORPORATE SMALL TREES IN | | | BUFFER | | | | | | ANDREW BURNETT | | | 561-822-1562 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-07-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
06-07-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
06-07-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-06-07 11:35:27 | NO OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN. | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DPET. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
11-08-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
11-08-2021 |
Time |
17:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
11-08-2021 |
Time |
17:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-11-08 17:20:56 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | 10-22-2021 SUBMITTAL: | | | | | | 1. [SATISFIED] THE CITY'S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM PER | | | CITY CODE IS NGVD1929. THE CITY IS ALLOWING SURVEYS AND | | | PLANS TO USE NAVD1988 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION EQUATION | | | BETWEEN NAVD1988 AND NGVD1929 IS ALSO PROVIDED. PROVIDE | | | THE CONVERSION EQUATION ON THE SURVEY. | | | | | | 2. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED - SEE NEW COMMENT #20 BELOW] | | | ADD VERTICAL DATUM AND CONVERSION EQUATION TO SHEETS | | | C-200 (FOR BENCHMARK ELEVATION) AND C-204. LABEL THE | | | VERTICAL DATUM ON SHEETS C-203 AND C-206. [[PREVIOUS | | | COMMENTS: LABEL THE VERTICAL DATUM AND CONVERSION | | | EQUATION TO NGVD1929 ON ALL CIVIL ENGINEERING SHEETS | | | WITH ELEVATION INFORMATION.] | | | | | | 3. [SATISFIED] MINIMUM 15 INCH DIAMETER RCP DRAINAGE | | | PIPE TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY. | | | | | | 4. [SATISFIED - CALCULATIONS TO BE PROVIDED WITH | | | ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL] DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE | | | DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP CRITERIA. | | | | | | 5. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE A PRB DETAIL AND LABEL THE | | | STRUCTURES WHERE A PRB WILL BE INSTALLED. [PREVIOUS | | | COMMENT: PRBS SHOULD BE USED IN STRUCTURES CONNECTED TO | | | EXFILTRATION TRENCHES AND ON THE OUTFALL PIPE. THE CITY | | | DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF BLEEDERS WITH EXFILTRATION | | | TRENCHES.] | | | | | | 6. [SATISFIED] THE SITE PLAN SHOWS THE EXISTING CATCH | | | BASIN ON DATURA STREET WEST OF THE DRIVEWAY. THE CIVIL | | | PLANS SHOW THE CATCH BASIN AT THE WEST SIDE OF THE | | | DRIVEWAY. IF THE SITE PLAN IS CORRECT, THEN SHOW THE | | | DRIVEWAY FLARE CONNECTING INTO THE EXISTING CURB | | | TRANSITION. IF THE CATCH BASIN IS WITHIN THE DRIVEWAY | | | THEN IT SHOULD BE CONVERTED TO A VALLEY GUTTER TOP AND | | | VALLEY GUTTER CONSTRUCTED ACROSS THE DRIVEWAY. | | | | | | 7. [SATISFIED] VALLEY GUTTER MAY NOT BE NEEDED AT THE | | | ALLEY DRIVEWAY. COORDINATE DESIGN WITH THE CITY'S | | | PROPOSED UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IN THE ALLEY. | | | | | | 8. [SATISFIED] MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT TO BE NEEDED FOR | | | THE IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED IN THE RIGHT OF WAY OF | | | QUADRILLE PLAZA DRIVE. | | | | | | 9. [SATISFIED] SITE SHOULD BE GRADED TO DRAIN | | | INTERNALLY TO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM AND NOT FLOW ACROSS | | | THE SIDEWALKS. | | | | | | 10. [SATISFIED] SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | | | | 11. [SATISFIED] SHOW AND LABEL THE LOCATION OF THE | | | PROPERTY LINE. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FROM BACK OF CURB TO | | | THE PROPERTY LINE. [PREVIOUS COMMENT: PROVIDE CROSS | | | SECTIONS FOR EACH DRIVEWAY AND FOR THE EAST PROPERTY | | | LINE FROM CENTER OF RIGHT OF WAY TO 10 FEET WITHIN THE | | | PROJECT.] | | | | | | 12. [SATISFIED] INDICATE IF A PERIMETER BERM WILL BE | | | REQUIRED TO CONTAIN STORMWATER RUNOFF UP TO THE 25-YEAR | | | 3-DAY STORM EVENT. | | | | | | 13. [SATISFIED - SUGGESTION CONSIDERED BUT CANNOT BE | | | IMPLEMENTED. SEE NEW COMMENT #21 BELOW.] SUGGEST | | | NARROWING THE WIDTH OF THE SOUTH DRIVEWAY IN ORDER TO | | | KEEP THE EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE AND CONVERT THE | | | STRUCTURE TO MANHOLE TOP. THE EXISTING ELECTRICAL DUCT | | | BANK MAY PREVENT THE INSTALLATION OF 15? RCP BETWEEN | | | THE NEW CATCH BASIN AND THE NEW MANHOLE IN THE RIGHT OF | | | WAY. | | | | | | 14. [SATISFIED - SEE NEW COMMENT #22 BELOW] LABEL | | | EXISTING PIPE SIZES AND MATERIAL FOR STORMWATER, | | | SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAINS. | | | | | | 15. [SATISFIED] THE SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1) SHOWS AND | | | EXISTING STORM PIPE ON DATURA STREET AS CURVING BETWEEN | | | A CATCH BASIN ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE ROAD AND A | | | MANHOLE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE ROAD. FURTHER WEST ON | | | DATURA STREET, A STORM PIPE IS SHOWN BENDING AROUND THE | | | POWER POLE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE STREET. HOW WERE | | | THESE PIPE ALIGNMENTS DETERMINED? | | | | | | 16. [NOT SATISFIED - CAN BE CORRECTED FOR ENGINEERING | | | PERMIT SUBMITTAL] SHEET C-203 SHOWS THE ELEVATION OF | | | THE FOUR CORNERS OF THE SIDEWALK CROSSING THE DRIVEWAY | | | TO BE THE SAME. THERE SHOULD BE A MINIMUM CROSS SLOPE | | | OF 0.5% FOR DRAINAGE AND MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF 2% FOR | | | ADA. THE CROSS SLOPE NEEDS TO BE SHOWN ON SECTION A-A | | | ON SHEET C-205. | | | | | | 17. [SATISFIED] INCREASE THE DEPTH OF THE SWALE EAST OF | | | THE PARKING SPACES. | | | | | | 18. [SATISFIED] COMMENT REVISED 9/13/2021 TO MATCH WHAT | | | WAS DISCUSSED WITH J. SCHMIDT ON 9/10/21) MOVE THE | | | PROPOSED CURBING OUT OF THE ALLEY RIGHT OF WAY. LABEL | | | THE CURBS ON SHEET C-200. | | | | | | 19. [NOT SATISFIED - CAN BE ADDRESSED FOR ENGINEERING | | | PERMIT SUBMITTAL] THE VALLEY GUTTER WILL NOT BE | | | PERPENDICULAR TO THE CURBING ON EITHER SIDE OF THE | | | DRIVEWAY. THE SOUTH EDGE OF THE VALLEY GUTTER SHOULD BE | | | TANGENT TO THE EP BETWEEN THE NEW MANHOLE (MH 1) AND | | | THE TYPE 'F' C&G. [PREVIOUS COMMENT: CAN THE VALLEY | | | GUTTER (DROP CURB) ACROSS THE SOUTH DRIVEWAY BE TANGENT | | | TO THE BULBOUT WEST OF THE DRIVEWAY? DRIVERS TURNING | | | FROM QUADRILLE PLAZA DRIVE AND FOLLOWING THE EDGE OF | | | PAVEMENT WILL HIT THE BULBOUT OR HAVE TO QUICKLY SHIFT | | | TO THE LEFT TO AVOID THE BULBOUT. MORE OF THE CURB AND | | | GUTTER EAST OF THE DRIVEWAY MAY NEED TO BE REPLACED (IF | | | THE ROAD IS WIDE ENOUGH) TO BE TANGENT ON THE EAST SIDE | | | ALSO.] | | | | | | NEW COMMENTS (CAN BE ADDRESSED DURING ENGINEERING | | | PERMIT SUBMITTAL): | | | | | | 20. ADD VERTICAL DATUM AND CONVERSION EQUATION TO SHEET | | | C-304. | | | | | | 21. THE TWO EXISTING PIPES BETWEEN THE CURB INLET TO BE | | | REMOVED AND THE STRUCTURE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF DATURA | | | STREET ARE LESS THAN 15 INCHES IN DIAMETER BECAUSE THE | | | ELECTRICAL DUCT BANK PREVENTED THE INSTALLATION OF 15 | | | INCH RCP. PROVIDE POTHOLE INFORMATION ON THE DUCT BANK | | | WHERE THE STORM PIPE WILL BE CROSSING. SHOW THE CORRECT | | | SIZE PIPES ON SHEET C-100, C-200 AND C-203. | | | | | | 22. LABEL THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PIPE SIZES AND | | | MATERIAL ON SHEET C-203. | | | | | | 23. THE SCALE BAR APPEARS TO BE MISLABELED ON SEVERAL | | | ENGINEERING SHEETS. | | | | | | 24. IS THE CONCRETE COLLAR (PLAN KEYNOTE #70 ON SHEET | | | C-200) AROUND STRUCTURE CB1 NECESSARY? THE SURROUNDING | | | PAVEMENT IS SHOWN TO BE CONCRETE. IF COLLAR IS NEEDED, | | | STAFF SUGGESTS THE COLLAR BE A MINIMUM 6 INCHES THICK | | | INSTEAD OF THE 3 INCHES SHOWN ON THE DETAIL ON SHEET | | | C-308. | | | | | | 25. SHOW OUTLINE OF EXFILTRATION TRENCH ON SHEETS C-200 | | | AND C-203. | | | | | | 26. IS YARD DRAIN YD1 NEEDED? CAN THE AREA BE GRADED TO | | | DRAIN TO CB2? | | | | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 (O) | | | 561-351-0510 (M) | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-09-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
09-09-2021 |
Time |
14:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
09-13-2021 |
Time |
11:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-09-09 14:41:15 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | 8/11/2021 SUBMITTAL: | | | | | | | | | 1. [SATISFIED] THE CITY'S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM PER | | | CITY CODE IS NGVD1929. THE CITY IS ALLOWING SURVEYS AND | | | PLANS TO USE NAVD1988 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION EQUATION | | | BETWEEN NAVD1988 AND NGVD1929 IS ALSO PROVIDED. PROVIDE | | | THE CONVERSION EQUATION ON THE SURVEY. | | | | | | 2. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] ADD VERTICAL DATUM AND | | | CONVERSION EQUATION TO SHEETS C-200 (FOR BENCHMARK | | | ELEVATION) AND C-204. LABEL THE VERTICAL DATUM ON | | | SHEETS C-203 AND C-206. [PREVIOUS COMMENT: LABEL THE | | | VERTICAL DATUM AND CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 ON | | | ALL CIVIL ENGINEERING SHEETS WITH ELEVATION | | | INFORMATION.] | | | | | | 3. [SATISFIED] MINIMUM 15 INCH DIAMETER RCP DRAINAGE | | | PIPE TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY. | | | | | | 4. [SATISFIED - CALCULATIONS TO BE PROVIDED WITH | | | ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL] DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE | | | DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP CRITERIA. | | | | | | 5. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE A PRB DETAIL AND LABEL THE | | | STRUCTURES WHERE A PRB WILL BE INSTALLED. [PREVIOUS | | | COMMENT: PRBS SHOULD BE USED IN STRUCTURES CONNECTED TO | | | EXFILTRATION TRENCHES AND ON THE OUTFALL PIPE. THE CITY | | | DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF BLEEDERS WITH EXFILTRATION | | | TRENCHES.] | | | | | | 6. [SATISFIED] THE SITE PLAN SHOWS THE EXISTING CATCH | | | BASIN ON DATURA STREET WEST OF THE DRIVEWAY. THE CIVIL | | | PLANS SHOW THE CATCH BASIN AT THE WEST SIDE OF THE | | | DRIVEWAY. IF THE SITE PLAN IS CORRECT, THEN SHOW THE | | | DRIVEWAY FLARE CONNECTING INTO THE EXISTING CURB | | | TRANSITION. IF THE CATCH BASIN IS WITHIN THE DRIVEWAY | | | THEN IT SHOULD BE CONVERTED TO A VALLEY GUTTER TOP AND | | | VALLEY GUTTER CONSTRUCTED ACROSS THE DRIVEWAY. | | | | | | 7. [SATISFIED] VALLEY GUTTER MAY NOT BE NEEDED AT THE | | | ALLEY DRIVEWAY. COORDINATE DESIGN WITH THE CITY'S | | | PROPOSED UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IN THE ALLEY. | | | | | | 8. [SATISFIED] MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT TO BE NEEDED FOR | | | THE IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED IN THE RIGHT OF WAY OF | | | QUADRILLE PLAZA DRIVE. | | | | | | 9. [SATISFIED] SITE SHOULD BE GRADED TO DRAIN | | | INTERNALLY TO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM AND NOT FLOW ACROSS | | | THE SIDEWALKS. | | | | | | 10. [SATISFIED] SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | | | | 11. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SHOW AND LABEL THE LOCATION | | | OF THE PROPERTY LINE. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FROM BACK OF | | | CURB TO THE PROPERTY LINE. [PREVIOUS COMMENT: PROVIDE | | | CROSS SECTIONS FOR EACH DRIVEWAY AND FOR THE EAST | | | PROPERTY LINE FROM CENTER OF RIGHT OF WAY TO 10 FEET | | | WITHIN THE PROJECT.] | | | | | | 12. [SATISFIED] INDICATE IF A PERIMETER BERM WILL BE | | | REQUIRED TO CONTAIN STORMWATER RUNOFF UP TO THE 25-YEAR | | | 3-DAY STORM EVENT. | | | | | | NEW COMMENTS: | | | 13. SUGGEST NARROWING THE WIDTH OF THE SOUTH DRIVEWAY | | | IN ORDER TO KEEP THE EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE AND | | | CONVERT THE STRUCTURE TO MANHOLE TOP. THE EXISTING | | | ELECTRICAL DUCT BANK MAY PREVENT THE INSTALLATION OF | | | 15? RCP BETWEEN THE NEW CATCH BASIN AND THE NEW MANHOLE | | | IN THE RIGHT OF WAY. | | | | | | 14. LABEL EXISTING PIPE SIZES AND MATERIAL FOR | | | STORMWATER, SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAINS. | | | | | | 15. THE SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1) SHOWS AND EXISTING | | | STORM PIPE ON DATURA STREET AS CURVING BETWEEN A CATCH | | | BASIN ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE ROAD AND A MANHOLE ON | | | THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE ROAD. FURTHER WEST ON DATURA | | | STREET, A STORM PIPE IS SHOWN BENDING AROUND THE POWER | | | POLE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE STREET. HOW WERE THESE | | | PIPE ALIGNMENTS DETERMINED? | | | | | | 16. SHEET C-203 SHOWS THE ELEVATION OF THE FOUR CORNERS | | | OF THE SIDEWALK CROSSING THE DRIVEWAY TO BE THE SAME. | | | THERE SHOULD BE A MINIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF 0.5% FOR | | | DRAINAGE AND MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF 2% FOR ADA. THE | | | CROSS SLOPE NEEDS TO BE SHOWN ON SECTION A-A ON SHEET | | | C-205. | | | | | | 17. INCREASE THE DEPTH OF THE SWALE EAST OF THE PARKING | | | SPACES. | | | | | | 18. COMMENT REVISED 9/13/2021 TO MATCH WHAT WAS | | | DISCUSSED WITH J. SCHMIDT ON 9/10/21) MOVE THE PROPOSED | | | CURBING OUT OF THE ALLEY RIGHT OF WAY. LABEL THE CURBS | | | ON SHEET C-200. | | | | | | 19. CAN THE VALLEY GUTTER (DROP CURB) ACROSS THE SOUTH | | | DRIVEWAY BE TANGENT TO THE BULBOUT WEST OF THE | | | DRIVEWAY? DRIVERS TURNING FROM QUADRILLE PLAZA DRIVE | | | AND FOLLOWING THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT WILL HIT THE BULBOUT | | | OR HAVE TO QUICKLY SHIFT TO THE LEFT TO AVOID THE | | | BULBOUT. MORE OF THE CURB AND GUTTER EAST OF THE | | | DRIVEWAY MAY NEED TO BE REPLACED (IF THE ROAD IS WIDE | | | ENOUGH) TO BE TANGENT ON THE EAST SIDE ALSO. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 (O) | | | 561-351-0510 (M) | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-10-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
06-10-2021 |
Time |
10:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
06-10-2021 |
Time |
10:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-06-10 10:45:44 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. THE CITY?S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM PER CITY CODE IS | | | NGVD1929. THE CITY IS ALLOWING SURVEYS AND PLANS TO USE | | | NAVD1988 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION EQUATION BETWEEN | | | NAVD1988 AND NGVD1929 IS ALSO PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE | | | CONVERSION EQUATION ON THE SURVEY. | | | | | | 2. LABEL THE VERTICAL DATUM AND CONVERSION EQUATION TO | | | NGVD1929 ON ALL CIVIL ENGINEERING SHEETS WITH ELEVATION | | | INFORMATION. | | | | | | 3. MINIMUM 15 INCH DIAMETER RCP DRAINAGE PIPE TO BE | | | CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY. | | | | | | 4. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP | | | CRITERIA. | | | | | | 5. PRBS SHOULD BE USED IN STRUCTURES CONNECTED TO | | | EXFILTRATION TRENCHES AND ON THE OUTFALL PIPE. THE CITY | | | DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF BLEEDERS WITH EXFILTRATION | | | TRENCHES. | | | | | | 6. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS THE EXISTING CATCH BASIN ON | | | DATURA STREET WEST OF THE DRIVEWAY. THE CIVIL PLANS | | | SHOW THE CATCH BASIN AT THE WEST SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY. | | | IF THE SITE PLAN IS CORRECT, THEN SHOW THE DRIVEWAY | | | FLARE CONNECTING INTO THE EXISTING CURB TRANSITION. IF | | | THE CATCH BASIN IS WITHIN THE DRIVEWAY THEN IT SHOULD | | | BE CONVERTED TO A VALLEY GUTTER TOP AND VALLEY GUTTER | | | CONSTRUCTED ACROSS THE DRIVEWAY. | | | | | | 7. VALLEY GUTTER MAY NOT BE NEEDED AT THE ALLEY | | | DRIVEWAY. COORDINATE DESIGN WITH THE CITY'S PROPOSED | | | UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IN THE ALLEY. | | | | | | 8. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT TO BE NEEDED FOR THE | | | IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED IN THE RIGHT OF WAY OF QUADRILLE | | | PLAZA DRIVE. | | | | | | 9. SITE SHOULD BE GRADED TO DRAIN INTERNALLY TO THE | | | DRAINAGE SYSTEM AND NOT FLOW ACROSS THE SIDEWALKS. | | | | | | 10. SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | | | | 11. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FOR EACH DRIVEWAY AND FOR | | | THE EAST PROPERTY LINE FROM CENTER OF RIGHT OF WAY TO | | | 10 FEET WITHIN THE PROJECT. | | | | | | 12. INDICATE IF A PERIMETER BERM WILL BE REQUIRED TO | | | CONTAIN STORMWATER RUNOFF UP TO THE 25-YEAR 3-DAY STORM | | | EVENT. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD OR FDEP ERP (IF | | | APPLICABLE) WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 3. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED | | | WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 4. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED WITH THE | | | ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 (O) | | | 561-351-0510 (M) | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-17-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
08-17-2021 |
Time |
09:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-08-17 09:57:42 | 1. SKETCH AND LEGAL FOR SIDEWALK IS APPROVED. | | | 2. PROVIDE DEED TO CITY PRIOR TO C.O. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-07-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
06-07-2021 |
Time |
08:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-06-07 08:39:05 | 1. SURVEY ALSO NEEDS TO BE A BOUNDARY OR ALTA SURVEY. | | | 2. ALLEY ALONG NORTH SIDE IS DUE FOR RE-CONSTRUCTION. | | | PLEASE COORDINATE WITH LINA CAMACHO IN PUBLIC | | | UTILITIES. | | | 3. SIDEWALK ALONG DATURA SHOULD BE ADDRESSED. CURRENTLY | | | ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
11-05-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
11-05-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-11-05 18:40:26 | NO FURTHER COMMENTS. | | | | | | TRAFFIC COMMENTS | | | 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE | | | TRUCK AND SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE | | | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES | | | CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A | | | SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING | | | 3) SATISFIED. REPAVE THE ALLEY AND PROVIDE PAVEMENT | | | MARKING AND SIGNS TO MAKE IT ONE WAY EASTBOUND | | | 4) SATISFIED. RE-DESIGN THE NORTH DRIVEWAY SO TO ALLOW | | | RIGHT-TURN OUT OF THE PARKING LOT | | | 5) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC | | | ROAD AND CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY OR PARKING STALLS) | | | OF THE PROPERTIES ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ALLEY | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-26-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
08-26-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-08-26 18:22:10 | NO FURTHER COMMENTS | | | | | | TRAFFIC COMMENTS | | | 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | | | | SITE COMMENTS | | | 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE | | | TRUCK AND SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE | | | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES | | | CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A | | | SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING | | | 3) SATISFIED. REPAVE THE ALLEY AND PROVIDE PAVEMENT | | | MARKING AND SIGNS TO MAKE IT ONE WAY EASTBOUND | | | 4) SATISFIED. RE-DESIGN THE NORTH DRIVEWAY SO TO ALLOW | | | RIGHT-TURN OUT OF THE PARKING LOT | | | 5) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC | | | ROAD AND CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY OR PARKING STALLS) | | | OF THE PROPERTIES ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ALLEY | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-10-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
06-10-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-06-10 02:00:31 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS | | | 1) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | | | | SITE COMMENTS | | | 2) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND | | | SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES CLEARLY | | | DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE | | | FILE/DRAWING | | | 3) REPAVE THE ALLEY AND PROVIDE PAVEMENT MARKING AND | | | SIGNS TO MAKE IT ONE WAY EASTBOUND | | | 4) RE-DESIGN THE NORTH DRIVEWAY SO TO ALLOW RIGHT-TURN | | | OUT OF THE PARKING LOT | | | 5) ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC ROAD AND | | | CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY OR PARKING STALLS) OF THE | | | PROPERTIES ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ALLEY | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
11-10-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
11-10-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
11-10-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-11-10 12:26:36 | ZONING APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: | | | | | | | | | 1.) THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE A DEED TO THE CITY FOR | | | THE 959 SQ. FT. RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION ALONG DATURA | | | STREET PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF | | | COMPLETION. | | | | | | | | | 2.) THE PARKING AREA SHALL BE PAVED WITH A LIGHTLY | | | REFLECTIVE SURFACE TO REDUCE THE HEAT ISLAND EFFECT ON | | | THE UNCOVERED SURFACE. | | | | | | | | | 3.) SIGNAGE IS NOT INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS APPROVAL. | | | ALL SIGNAGE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE SIGNAGE REQUIREMENTS | | | OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS) | | | AND SHALL BE REVIEWED BY SEPARATE PERMIT. | | | | | | | | | 4.) THE FREESTANDING SIGN LOCATED AT THE DATURA STREET | | | ENTRANCE SHALL ONLY PROVIDE DIRECTIONAL INFORMATION; | | | ANY LOGO OR BRANDING INFORMATION IS PROHIBITED ON THIS | | | SIGN. | | | | | | | | | 5.) THE REMOVABLE FENCE ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE PARKING | | | AREA SHALL BE OF OPAQUE MATERIAL OR VINYL-COATED CHAIN | | | LINK. IF VINYL-COATED CHAIN LINK IS USED, ADDITIONAL | | | SCREENING SHALL BE REQUIRED AND APPROVED BY PLANNING | | | STAFF. THE REMOVABLE FENCE SHALL BE APPROVED BY | | | SEPARATE PERMIT. | | | | | | | | | 6.) A LETTER FROM COMCAST, CONFIRMING THAT THE PROJECT | | | DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR UTILITY EASEMENT OR | | | OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISION OF THEIR SERVICE | | | SHALL BE PROVIDED TO PLANNING STAFF PRIOR TO ZONING | | | APPROVAL OF ANY PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT. | | | | | | | | | 7.) PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION. | | | | | | | | | 8.) THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH | | | THIS PETITION. | | | | | | | | | 9.) THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH | | | THIS PETITION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE | | | MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. THE MAINTENANCE | | | AGREEMENT SHALL BE EXECUTED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A | | | CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION. | | | | | | | | | 10.) PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR ANY | | | STRUCTURES, A LANDSCAPE PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH | | | PLANS REVISED TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS: | | | | | | A. RELOCATE THE PROPOSED SIMPSON'S STOPPER TREE IN THE | | | SOUTH BUFFER IN CONFLICT WITH AN EXISTING UTILITY POLE. | | | | | | B. PLANT LIST ON SHEET LP-1 IS NOT ACCURATE. REMOVE | | | FROM SHEET LP-1 AND ONLY INCLUDE ACCURATE PLANT LIST ON | | | SHEET LP-2. | | | | | | C. REMOVE CREEPING FIG ON COLUMNS. IF THE VINES WERE TO | | | ATTACH TO THE DECORATIVE HISTORIC TILES, THEY COULD | | | DAMAGE THE SURFACE. | | | | | | D. MICRO-MOBILITY STATION WAS MOVED NORTH, PLANTINGS | | | ARE TO BE EXTENDED ALONG THE BUILDING WHERE A UTILITY | | | POLE AND TRASH RECEPTACLE BLOCK ACCESS. | | | | | | | | | 11.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING FOR ENGINEERING | | | PERMIT: | | | | | | A. SHEET C-203 SHOWS THE ELEVATION OF THE FOUR CORNERS | | | OF THE SIDEWALK CROSSING THE DRIVEWAY TO BE THE SAME. | | | THERE SHOULD BE A MINIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF 0.5% FOR | | | DRAINAGE AND MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF 2% FOR ADA. THE | | | CROSS SLOPE NEEDS TO BE SHOWN ON SECTION A-A ON SHEET | | | C-205. | | | | | | B. THE VALLEY GUTTER WILL NOT BE PERPENDICULAR TO THE | | | CURBING ON EITHER SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY. THE SOUTH EDGE | | | OF THE VALLEY GUTTER SHOULD BE TANGENT TO THE EP | | | BETWEEN THE NEW MANHOLE (MH 1) AND THE TYPE 'F' C&G. | | | | | | C. ADD VERTICAL DATUM AND CONVERSION EQUATION TO SHEET | | | C-304. | | | | | | D. THE TWO EXISTING PIPES BETWEEN THE CURB INLET TO BE | | | REMOVED AND THE STRUCTURE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF DATURA | | | STREET ARE LESS THAN 15 INCHES IN DIAMETER BECAUSE THE | | | ELECTRICAL DUCT BANK PREVENTED THE INSTALLATION OF | | | 15-INCH RCP. PROVIDE POTHOLE INFORMATION ON THE DUCK | | | BANK WHERE THE STORM PIPE WILL BE CROSSING. SHOW THE | | | CORRECT SIZE PIPES ON SHEET C-100, C-200 AND C-203. | | | | | | E. LABEL THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PIPE SIZES AND | | | MATERIAL ON SHEET C-203. | | | | | | F. THE SCALE BAR APPEARS TO BE MISLABELED ON SEVERAL | | | ENGINEERING SHEETS. | | | | | | G. IS THE CONCRETE COLLAR (PLAN KEYNOTE #70 ON SHEET | | | C-200) AROUND THE STRUCTURE CB1 NECESSARY? THE | | | SURROUNDING PAVEMENT IS SHOWN TO BE CONCRETE. IF COLLAR | | | IS NEEDED, STAFF SUGGESTS THE COLLAR BE A MINIMUM | | | 6-INCH THICK INSTEAD OF 3-INCHES SHOWN ON THE DETAIL ON | | | SHEET C-308. | | | | | | H. SHOW OUTLINE OF EXFILTRATION TRENCH ON SHEETS C-200 | | | AND C-203. | | | | | | I. IS YARD DRAIN YD1 NEEDED? CAN THE AREA BE GRADED TO | | | DRAIN TO CB2? | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-26-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
08-26-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
08-26-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-08-26 12:26:30 | GENERAL COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS TO OCCUR ON A HEAVY UTILITY | | | SITE WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN CORE. STAFF WOULD LIKE TO | | | CONTINUE TO WORK WITH THE APPLICANT ON IMPROVEMENTS TO | | | THE ENTIRE SITE THAT WOULD REDUCE THE NEGATIVE VISUAL | | | IMPACT OF THE UTILITY FACILITY ON THE PUBLIC REALM. SEE | | | STAFF'S COMMENTS ON THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN | | | BELOW. | | | | | | 2.) THE FPL SERVICE LETTER (DATED JULY 23, 2021) STATES | | | " FACILITIES HAVE POTENTIAL TO BE REQUIRED TO BE | | | RE-LOCATED AND EASEMENTS ADJUSTED WITHIN THE SCOPE OF | | | THE PROJECT." HAVE THE PLANS BEEN MODIFIED TO ADDRESS | | | FPL'S COMMENT? ALL POTENTIAL UTILITY ISSUES MUST BE | | | RESOLVED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL. | | | | | | 3.) SERVICE LETTERS FROM COMCAST AND FPU ARE STILL | | | OUTSTANDING. | | | | | | 4.) RENDERINGS MUST BE ACCURATE AND MATCH ALL EXISTING | | | AND PROPOSED CONDITIONS FOR THE PROJECT. REVIEW OF THE | | | LATEST SET OF RENDERINGS WITH THE PLANS DO NOT MATCH. | | | PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. | | | | | | | | | | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) BARBED WIRED IS NOT PERMITTED ABOVE THE FENCE AND | | | SHALL BE REMOVED. THIS IS DEPICTED IN THE RENDERINGS | | | AND IN THE ENGINEERING PLANS. | | | | | | 2.) PLEASE IDENTIFY THE EXISTING ON-STREET PARKING VS. | | | PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING ON DATURA STREET. THE FEE IS | | | $16,900/REMOVED SPACE. | | | | | | 3.) SKETCH AND LEGAL HAS BEEN PROVIDED FOR THE ROW | | | DEDICATION ALONG DATURA (8/4/2021 RESUBMITTAL); | | | HOWEVER, THE ROW DEDICATION SHALL ALSO BE | | | ILLUSTRATED/CROSSHATCHED AND NOTATED IN THE SITE PLAN | | | AND ROW DEDICATION CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN | | | THE SITE DATA TABULAR (SHEET SP-1) FOR CONSISTENCY. | | | | | | 4.) A NEW FENCE IS DEPICTED ALONG QUADRILLE PLAZA ROAD | | | (NOT PERMITTED OUTSIDE OF THE PROPERTY LINE) AND | | | CONTINUING ALONG DATURA STREET AND THE ALLEY FOR THE | | | PROJECT. THERE IS NO INFORMATION/DETAIL/NOTE PROVIDED | | | ON THIS FENCE. PLEASE NOTE THAT STAFF OPPOSES THIS | | | FENCE AS IT INHIBITS ACCESS AND INTEGRATION TO THE | | | PUBLIC PLAZA. | | | | | | 5.) THERE ARE SAFETY CONCERNS WITH THE ACCESSIBLE SPACE | | | BETWEEN THE ENCLOSURE AND THE DC CONVERTER. IT IS | | | HIGHLY RECOMMENDED THAT ONE SCREEN ENCLOSURE IS USED TO | | | SCREEN ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND/OR GATES ARE | | | PROVIDED TO ELIMINATE THE ACCESSIBLE SPACE BETWEEN THE | | | EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 6.) SETBACK DISTANCE FOR THE SOLAR PANEL TABLE CLOSEST | | | TO THE PROPERTY LINE IS STILL MISSING. SETBACK DISTANCE | | | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OF | | | ZLDR S.94-122; A MINIMUM OF 16 FT. FROM THE BACK OF | | | CURB IS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 7.) ALTHOUGH THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSE LETTER (DATED | | | 8/2/2021) STATES THAT "TELECOMMUNICATION AND POWERLINES | | | WILL BE RELOCATED IN COORDINATION WITH ENGINEERING | | | SERVICES," A NOTE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN | | | IDENTIFYING WHICH POLES WILL BE RELOCATED (AS THE | | | UTILITY POLES ARE STILL REFLECTED AS INCUMBRANCES IN | | | THE SITE PLAN] | | | | | | 8.) THE RENDERINGS DEPICT AN ARTISTIC SURFACE FOR THE | | | PARKING LOT; HOWEVER, DETAILS HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED ON | | | THE ARTWORK. IF ART IS NOT PROVIDED ON THE PAVEMENT, | | | THE PARKING AREA SHALL BE PAVED WITH A LIGHTLY | | | REFLECTIVE SURFACE TO REDUCE THE HEAT ISLAND EFFECT ON | | | UNCOVERED SURFACE. | | | | | | 9.) THE RENDERINGS ILLUSTRATE AN AIR PUMP THAT IS NOT | | | NOTED IN THE SITE PLAN. THE LOCATION OF THE AIR PUMP IN | | | THE MIDDLE OF THE ONE-WAY DRIVE AISLE IS NOT IDEAL AND | | | SHOULD BE EITHER ELIMINATED OR RELOCATED TO A MORE | | | APPROPRIATE LOCATION. | | | | | | 10.) CAN THE TWO ELECTRICAL POLES BE COMBINED TO ONE ON | | | DATURA STREET? | | | | | | | | | | | | SIGNAGE COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) MONUMENT SIGNS ARE PROHIBITED WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN | | | MASTER PLAN (DMP) AREA. THE PROJECT PROPOSES A MONUMENT | | | SIGN AT THE DATURA STREET ENTRANCE, WHICH IS NOT | | | PERMITTED. DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE IS PERMITTED [ZLDR | | | S.94-110(B)(3)]. [NOTE: STAFF IS CURRENTLY REVIEWING A | | | SEPARATE SIGN PACKAGE SUBMITTED AND WILL ADVISE ON | | | COMPLIANCE ISSUES.] | | | | | | | | | | | | PHOTOMETRIC PLAN: | | | | | | 1.) GROUND LIGHTING, AS DEPICTED IN THE RENDERINGS, DO | | | NOT SEEM TO BE DEPICTED IN THE PLANS. PLEASE ADDRESS | | | FOR CONSISTENCY. | | | | | | | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX | | | (6) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 11 INCHES X | | | 17 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND | | | DOCUMENTS. | | | | | | * ANY CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE | | | ($300.00). | | | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE | | | QUESTIONS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-10-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
06-10-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
06-10-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-06-10 09:01:35 | GENERAL COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS TO OCCUR ON A HEAVY UTILITY | | | SITE WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN CORE. STAFF WOULD LIKE TO | | | CONTINUE TO WORK WITH THE APPLICANT ON IMPROVEMENTS TO | | | THE ENTIRE SITE THAT WOULD REDUCE THE NEGATIVE VISUAL | | | IMPACT OF THE UTILITY FACILITY ON THE PUBLIC REALM. | | | | | | 2.) ALTHOUGH IT IS UNDERSTOOD BY STAFF THAT PUBLIC | | | UTILITIES AND SERVICES WILL BE MINIMALLY IMPACTED BY | | | THE PROJECT, PLEASE PROVIDE SERVICE LETTERS FROM THE | | | CITY AND UTILITY PROVIDERS CONFIRMING THAT THE PROJECT | | | WILL NOT IMPACT THEIR SERVICES FOR THE FILE. | | | | | | | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT ACCURATELY DEPICT ALL | | | EXISTING AND PROPOSED CONDITIONS ON THE SITE AND FOR | | | THE PROJECT (I.E. SERVICE GATES ALONG DATURA STREET ARE | | | NOT SHOWN, PROPOSED LIGHT POLES ARE SHOWN IN THE | | | PHOTOMETRIC PLAN BUT NOT IN THE SITE PLAN, ETC.). | | | PLEASE ILLUSTRATE ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED CONDITIONS | | | FOR CONSISTENCY. ALL PLANS SHALL MATCH FOR CONSISTENCY. | | | | | | 2.) THE MINIMUM SETBACK FOR THE PROPOSED PARKING SHALL | | | BE MEASURED FROM THE PREDOMINANT BACK OF CURB LINE | | | FURTHEST FROM THE CENTER LINE OF THE ROAD. THE SETBACK | | | DIMENSION OF 21 FT. ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE PROJECT IS | | | NOT MEASURED FROM THE PREDOMINANT BACK OF CURB. THE | | | MINIMUM SETBACK IS 16 FT. AND THE PROPOSED SETBACK DOES | | | NOT SEEM TO COMPLY. [ZLDR S.94-109] | | | | | | 3.) THERE ARE EXISTING UTILITY POLES AND OVERHEAD WIRES | | | ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE (AT LEAST ONE POLE | | | FIXTURE IS ENCUMBERING THE NORTH EXIT DRIVE). PLEASE | | | COORDINATE WITH THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ON | | | THE ALLEYWAY IMPROVEMENT AND RELOCATION OF THE OVERHEAD | | | POWER LINES. | | | | | | 4.) THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS) | | | REQUIRES THE ACCESS POINTS TO HAVE A MINIMUM DISTANCE | | | SEPARATION OF 50 FT. FROM QUADRILLE PLAZA DRIVE. IF | | | THIS CANNOT BE MET, A VARIANCE WILL BE REQUIRED. [ZLDR | | | S.94-312(2)] | | | | | | 5.) THE SIDEWALK ALONG DATURA STREET SEEMS TO BE | | | UNEVEN. HOW WIDE IS THE SIDEWALK (EXISTING AND | | | PROPOSED)? THE WIDTH OF THE SIDEWALK (AT MINIMUM) SHALL | | | BE CONSISTENT IN WIDTH ALONG THE ENTIRE DATURA STREET | | | FRONTAGE. | | | | | | 6.) PROVIDE THE SETBACK DISTANCE OF ALL PROPOSED | | | STRUCTURES FOR THE PROJECT (I.E. LIGHT POLES, SOLAR | | | TREES, ETC.) OR ILLUSTRATE THE MINIMUM SETBACK LINE IN | | | THE PLAN TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE SETBACK | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ZLDR S.94-122, TABLE IV-24. | | | | | | 7.) HOW TALL IS THE FENCE AT THE REMOVABLE FENCE LINE | | | (AS NOTED IN THE PLAN)? ALSO, IS THE PROPOSED FENCE | | | OPAQUE TO SCREEN THE SUBSTATION? INCLUDE A DETAIL WITH | | | THE PLANS. | | | | | | 8.) THERE IS INADEQUATE BACKOUT DISTANCE FOR THE | | | SOUTHERN-MOST EV PARKING STALL FOR THE PROJECT. A | | | MINIMUM OF 24 FT. (NOT 20 FT.) SHALL BE PROVIDED. THIS | | | CAN BE ACHIEVED BY SHIFTING THE STALLS A FEW FEET | | | NORTH. | | | | | | 9.) ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT THAT IS NOT INTERACTIVE | | | FOR THE PUBLIC SHALL BE MOVED TO THE WEST SIDE OF THE | | | DRIVE AISLE AND SCREENED FROM VIEW. THERE SEEMS TO BE | | | SPACE ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE DRIVE AISLE FOR THE | | | EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 10.) SINCE THERE IS ONLY A ONE-WAY DRIVE AISLE FOR THE | | | PROJECT, PLEASE REDUCE THE CURB CUT WIDTH TO 12-14 FT. | | | THIS MAY HELP TO MEET THE MINIMUM CORNER CLEARANCE | | | DISTANCE REQUIREMENT PER ZLDR S. 94-312(2). | | | | | | 11.) HOW TALL IS THE SCREEN WALL FOR THE MECHANICAL | | | EQUIPMENT? PLEASE NOTE THE HEIGHT IN THE SITE PLAN. | | | ALSO, ALL COMPONENTS OF THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL | | | HIDDEN BY THE SCREEN WALL. | | | | | | 12.) WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE GREEN WALL ALONG THE | | | EAST PROPERTY LINE (BETWEEN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THE | | | PARKING STALLS)? IF THE SCREEN DOES NOT PROVIDE A | | | PURPOSE, STAFF RECOMMENDS ELIMINATING THE SCREEN TO | | | PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PLANTING SPACE. THE GREEN WALL CAN | | | BE USED TO SCREEN THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 13.) PROVIDE A STALL STRIPING DETAIL IN THE SITE PLAN. | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT THE STALL STRIPING DETAIL SHALL BE | | | CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS IN ZLDR S.94-485, | | | FIGURE XV-2. | | | | | | 14.) WHAT TYPE OF CURB (I.E. TYPE D, ETC.) SEPARATES | | | THE EV STALLS FROM THE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY? IF THE CURB | | | IS FLUSHED, THEN WHEEL STOPS WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED | | | FOR THE EV PARKING SPACES AND MUST ALSO BE ILLUSTRATED | | | IN THE PLAN. | | | | | | 15.) IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT LANDSCAPING BE INSTALLED | | | ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF THE PROJECT (ABUTTING | | | THE ALLEY). THE LANDSCAPING WOULD PROVIDE A PHYSICAL | | | SEPARATION FROM THE ALLEY AND ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING | | | FOR THE PROJECT. | | | | | | 16.) A RIGHT-OUT ONLY SIGNAGE/PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED FOR THE EXIT POINT INTO THE ALLEY. | | | | | | | | | SIGNAGE COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) MONUMENT SIGNS ARE PROHIBITED WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN | | | MASTER PLAN (DMP) AREA. THE PROJECT PROPOSES A MONUMENT | | | SIGN AT THE DATURA STREET ENTRANCE, WHICH IS NOT | | | PERMITTED. DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE MAY BE PERMITTED. [ZLDR | | | S.94-110(B)(3)] | | | | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX | | | (6) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 11 INCHES X | | | 17 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND | | | DOCUMENTS. | | | | | | * ANY CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE | | | ($300.00). | | | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE | | | QUESTIONS. | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |