Home Records and Reports Contractor Records Owner Records Permit Records Permit Reports Business Reports Property Records Business Tax My Account Code Enforcement Contact Us Log In/Out Print Plan Review Stops For Project Z21050015 Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES Rev No 3 Status P Date 09-20-2021 Cont ID   Sent By scwelter Date 09-20-2021 Time 15:28 Rev Time 0.00 Received By scwelter Date 09-20-2021 Time 15:32 Sent To   Notes 2021-09-20 15:32:06 PUBLIC ART - POSSIBLE SITES IDENTIFIED ON SITE PLAN -   FINAL PLACEMENT TO BE DETERMINED.       A COMPLETED ART ASSESSMENT APPLICATION AND EVIDENCE OF   ESCROW ARE DUE AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT. Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES Rev No 2 Status F Date 06-10-2021 Cont ID   Sent By scwelter Date 06-10-2021 Time 10:03 Rev Time 0.00 Received By scwelter Date 06-10-2021 Time 11:38 Sent To   Notes 2021-06-10 10:04:39 PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT:   IF TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT ARE   OVER $500,000 IT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC ART   REQUIREMENT AS PER CITY ORDINANCE.   SECTION 78-129: ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS,   INCLUDING NEW CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR   IMPROVEMENT OF AN EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE TOTAL   CONSTRUCTION COSTS ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN   $500,000 ARE SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT.   OPTION 1: INSTALL ARTWORK ON THE DEVELOPMENT SITE   VALUED IN AN AMOUNT NOT LESS THAN ONE PERCENT OF THE   TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS; OR   OPTION 2: CONTRIBUTE AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO 75 PERCENT OF   ONE PERCENT OF THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR DEPOSIT   TO THE PUBLIC ART ACCOUNT.   A COMPLETED PUBLIC ART ASSESSMENT APPLICATION IS   REQUIRED AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.       PLEASE CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER AT [email protected] OR   561.822.1521 TO OBTAIN AN APPLICATION AND REVIEW THE   REQUIREMENTS.     Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) Rev No 4 Status P Date 09-28-2021 Cont ID   Sent By rbrown Date 09-28-2021 Time 18:57 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rbrown Date 09-28-2021 Time 18:57 Sent To   Notes 2021-09-28 19:10:43 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,   COMMENTS:       1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE   SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH   FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE   ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.       2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AN ASBESTOS   SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT   REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH   COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963,   OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]       3. FLOOD ZONE. PROVISO/CONDITION: AS STATED IN THEIR   PPRC RESPONSE LETTER DATED 9/13/2021 THE DESIGN TEAM   HAS ADVISED THAT IT WILL SEEK ISSUANCE OF A LETTER OF   MAP REVISION BASED ON FILL LOMR-F BY FEMA IN ORDER TO   ADDRESS THE COMMENT REGARDING THE PROPOSED FINISHED   FLOOR LEVEL BEING EL 9.0 FT NAVD INSTEAD OF THE EL 10.0   FT NAVD THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED TO MEET THE BASE FLOOD   ELEVATION PLUS 2.0 FT FREEBOARD. CONDITION: EITHER THE   LOMR-F MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING DIVISION PRIOR   TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE, OR THE FINISHED FLOOR   LEVEL BEING RAISED TO EL 10.0 FT NAVD.       4. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,   THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR   THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,   AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE   FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.       5. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES   NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO   MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL   BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE   EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED   TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR   OTHER APPROVED METHODS.       6. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE   REQUIRED. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE   AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT TIM LARGE, CHIEF PLUMBING   INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561)   805-6692, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]       7. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS   AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE   WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED   FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,   GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND   OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,   SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.       8. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND   CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF   CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL   NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.       9. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER   AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,   INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE   CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF   NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION   THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.       10. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT   WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL   HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION   OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,   CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT   (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]       ROBERT BROWN   BUILDING OFFICIAL   TEL: 561 805 6652   EMAIL: [email protected]     Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) Rev No 3 Status F Date 09-02-2021 Cont ID   Sent By rbrown Date 09-02-2021 Time 20:24 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rbrown Date 09-02-2021 Time 20:24 Sent To   Notes 2021-09-02 20:56:47 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,   COMMENTS:       1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE   SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH   FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE   ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.       2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AN ASBESTOS   SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT   REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH   COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963,   OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]       3. FLOOD ZONE. SHEET C-500, PAVING, GRADING AND   DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWS THE TOWNHOME FINISHED FLOOR   ELEVATION (INCLUDING TOWNHOUSE -1 L1) TO BE AT EL 9.00   NAVD. THE CITY HAS SUBMITTED AN APPEAL TO FEMA AGAINST   THE METHODOLOGY USED BY FEMA TO ARRIVE AT THE FLOOD   ELEVATIONS IN THE LATEST FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS   (FIRMS), BUT THE DISPOSITION OF THE APPEAL IS UNKNOWN   AT THIS TIME. THEREFORE ACCORDING TO THE FLOOD   INSURANCE RATE MAPS, THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS IN FLOOD   ZONE AE WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 8 FT NAVD. THE   FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL ASSOCIATED   MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS ETC.) SHALL   BE 24 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD   ELEVATION, AND THAT IS EL 10.00 FT NAVD SO THE FINISHED   FLOOR ELEVATION MUST BE RAISED TO THAT ELEVATION. ALSO   THE ENTRANCE DOOR THRESHOLD TO TOWNHOUSE -1 L1 IS   CURRENTLY SHOWN TO BE LOWER THAN THE ADJACENT SIDEWALK   LEVEL WHICH IS APPROXIMATELY EL 11 FT NAVD. THERE IS A   RELATIVELY SMALL AREA OF EXTERIOR GRADES AT   APPROXIMATELY EL 8.8 FT NAVD (SWALE) BETWEEN THAT   SIDEWALK AND THE DOOR THRESHOLD SO THE TOWNHOME COULD   POTENTIALLY BE FLOODED DURING A STORM.       4. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THE PARKING   DATA TABLE ON SHEET A-100, BASEMENT LEVEL 00 FLOOR PLAN   SHOWS THAT 41 PARKING SPACES ARE DEDICATED TO THE CAFE.   THEREFORE 2 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES MUST BE PROVIDED   AND THEY MUST BE THE CLOSEST PARKING SPACES TO THE CAFE   ENTRANCE. SHEET A-101, LEVEL 01 FLOOR PLAN, SHOWS 3   ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ON THAT LEVEL BUT ONLY 1 OF   THEM IS NEAR THE ENTRANCE TO THE CAFE AND IT IS NOT THE   CLOSEST PARKING SPACE TO THE ENTRANCE. PLEASE MAKE THE   2 PARKING SPACES CLOSEST TO THE ENTRANCE OF THE CAFE,   ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES . PER SECTION 208.3 OF   FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES   ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF   TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE.   THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL COMPLY   WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE       5. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,   THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR   THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,   AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE   FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.       6. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES   NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO   MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL   BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE   EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED   TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR   OTHER APPROVED METHODS.       7. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE   REQUIRED. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE   AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT TIM LARGE, CHIEF PLUMBING   INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561)   805-6692, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]       8. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS   AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE   WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED   FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,   GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND   OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,   SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.       9. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND   CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF   CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL   NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.       10. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER   AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,   INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE   CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF   NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION   THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.       11. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT   WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL   HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION   OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,   CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT   (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]       12. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT   TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE   ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP   ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC   PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:   [email protected]       ROBERT BROWN   BUILDING OFFICIAL   TEL: 561 805 6652   EMAIL: [email protected]     Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) Rev No 2 Status P Date 07-16-2021 Cont ID   Sent By rbrown Date 07-16-2021 Time 22:18 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rbrown Date 07-16-2021 Time 22:18 Sent To   Notes 2021-07-16 22:20:46 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,   COMMENTS:       1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE   SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH   FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE   ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.       2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AN ASBESTOS   SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT   REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH   COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963,   OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]       3. FLOOD ZONE. ACCORDING TO THE ADOPTED FLOOD INSURANCE   RATE MAPS (FIRMS), THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS IN FLOOD   ZONE AE WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 6 FT NAVD. THE   FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL ASSOCIATED   MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS ETC.) SHALL   BE 24 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD   ELEVATION.       4. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,   THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR   THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,   AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE   FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.       5. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES   NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO   MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL   BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE   EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED   TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR   OTHER APPROVED METHODS.       6. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE   REQUIRED. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE   AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT TIM LARGE, CHIEF PLUMBING   INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561)   805-6692, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]       7. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS   AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE   WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED   FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,   GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND   OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,   SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.       8. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND   CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF   CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL   NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.       9. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER   AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,   INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE   CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF   NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION   THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.       10. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT   WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL   HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION   OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,   CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT   (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]       11. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT   TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE   ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP   ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC   PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:   [email protected]       ROBERT BROWN   BUILDING OFFICIAL   TEL: 561 805 6652   EMAIL: [email protected]     Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-09-2021 Cont ID   Sent By rbrown Date 06-09-2021 Time 20:56 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rbrown Date 06-09-2021 Time 20:56 Sent To   Notes 2021-06-09 21:04:58 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,   COMMENTS:       1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE   SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH   FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE   ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.       2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AN ASBESTOS   SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT   REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH   COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963,   OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]       3. FLOOD ZONE. ACCORDING TO THE ADOPTED FLOOD INSURANCE   RATE MAPS (FIRMS), THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS IN FLOOD   ZONE AE WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 6 FT NAVD. THE   FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL ASSOCIATED   MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS ETC.) SHALL   BE 24 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD   ELEVATION.       4. NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. ONLY 4   ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE SHOWN (2 ON SHEET A-101   AND 2 ON SHEET A-102). WITH 311 PARKING SPACES BEING   PROVIDED, 8 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED. THE   MINIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED   SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 208.2 OF FLORIDA   ACCESSIBILITY CODE.       5. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. NONE OF THE   ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE MARKED AS VAN ACCESSIBLE.   PER SECTION 208.2.4 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE   IN EVERY SIX REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE)   IN A PARKING STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND   DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA   ACCESSIBILITY CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98   INCHES AT SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)       6. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,   THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR   THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,   AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE   FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.       7. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES   NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO   MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL   BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE   EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED   TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR   OTHER APPROVED METHODS.       8. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE   REQUIRED. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE   AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT TIM LARGE, CHIEF PLUMBING   INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561)   805-6692, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]       9. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS   AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE   WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED   FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,   GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND   OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,   SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.       10. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND   CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF   CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL   NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.       11. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER   AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,   INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE   CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF   NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION   THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.       12. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT   WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL   HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION   OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,   CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT   (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]       13. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT   TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE   ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP   ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC   PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:   [email protected]       ROBERT BROWN   BUILDING OFFICIAL   TEL: 561 805 6652   EMAIL: [email protected]     Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 4 Status P Date 08-27-2021 Cont ID   Sent By rrossano Date 08-27-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By rrossano Date 08-27-2021 Time   Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 3 Status F Date 08-11-2021 Cont ID   Sent By rrossano Date 08-11-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By rrossano Date 08-11-2021 Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-08-11 07:21:33 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD   CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES,   PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]:   -PLEASE RELOCATE IRRIGATION METER OUT OF HARDSCAPE AND   INTO GRASS LANDSCAPE. METER BOX CANNOT BE IN SIDEWALK.       -LABELS FOR 6 INCH METERS TALK ABOUT VAULTS, BUT   ABOVE-GROUND METERS DON?T HAVE VAULTS. THEY WILL JUST   HAVE CONCRETE SLAB WITH SMALLER BOXES.       -WHICH METERS WILL FEED THE COOLING TOWER?       -VERIFY NO CONFLICT WITH FIRELINES AND FPL UTILITIES OR   FPL EASEMENT INSIDE PROPERTY.       -GUY WIRE SHOWS IN MIDDLE OF SIDEWALK NEAR NORTH   PROPERTY LINE ON LANDSCAPE PLAN. WILL IT REMAIN THERE   BY END OF PROJECT?       -ADD VISUAL SCALE ICONS TO LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEETS   INCLUDING GROUND PLANTING PLAN LG-3.1.       -GROUND PLANTING PLAN SHOWS MANY TREES IN CLOSE   PROXIMITY TO UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE. CONCERNED ABOUT   ROOTS. THERE WERE ALSO A COUPLE TREES THAT LOOKED TO BE   PROPOSED ON TOP OF WATER SERVICES AND WATER MAINS.   PLEASE LOOK AGAIN AT THE LENGTH OF OLIVE, AND ALSO THE   AREAS AROUND THE 6 INCH METERS AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES,   AND MAKE SURE NO CONFLICTS WITH TREES AND UTILITIES.   MAY NEED TO INCREASE CLEARANCE DISTANCE AND ADD MORE   ROOT BARRIERS. IF ADDING ROOT BARRIERS, MAKE SURE THEY   ARE DRAWN AND LABELED CLEARLY ON GROUND PLANTING PLAN.       -ADD RP TO LABEL FOR IRRIGATION BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY ON   UTILITY PLAN.       -LG3.2 SHOWS TREES PLANTED ON TOP OF STORMWATER   UTILITY. ARE THE TREES EXISTING OR PROPOSED?       -FOR THE PARKING SPACES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF DIANA PL,   TREES ARE PLANTED CLOSE TO CURB. WILL VEHICLE   PASSENGERS BE ABLE TO OPEN THEIR DOORS AND EXIT   VEHICLES WITHOUT HITTING THE TREES?       -IRRIGATION PLAN DOES NOT SHOW UPDATED LOCATION OF   IRRIGATION METER AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY. PLEASE UPDATE   IRRIGATION PLAN WITH THE UPDATED LOCATIONS SO THEY   MATCH CIVIL PLANS.       -LANDSCAPING PLAN SHEET D-2 HAS EMPTY BOXES. IS IT   SUPPOSED TO BE EMPTY OR IS INFORMATION MISSING?         Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-06-2021 Cont ID   Sent By rrossano Date 07-06-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By rrossano Date 07-06-2021 Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-07-06 19:05:15 FOLLOWUP COMMENTS:       36. HOW WIDE IS SIDEWALK NEAR PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT AND   FDC? RESPONSE: SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS HAVE BEEN ADDED TO   SHEET C5.00   CANNOT FIND ON SHEET C5.00 PAVING PLAN OR ANY OTHER   SHEET. PLEASE ADD DIMENSION TO UTILITY PLAN. SIDEWALK   INQUIRING ABOUT IS THE ONE NORTH OF THE WATER METERS.           COMMENTS AS FOLLOWS:       -6 INCH AND 3 INCH METERS WITH THEIR ASSOCIATED   BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES NEED TO BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE   BUILDING. LOCATION OF 6 INCH METER SHOULD BE CLOSE   ENOUGH TO CURB/STREET TO ACCESS WITH CRANE TRUCK   (APPROX. 15 FOOT REACH)       -6 INCH AND 3 INCH METERS NEED TO BE INSTALLED ABOVE   GROUND VIA WATER SERVICE STANDARD DETAIL WS-3 REVISION   SEP2019.       -WATER SERVICE FOR 3 INCH METER WILL HAVE A SIMILAR   FOOTPRINT AREA TO 6 INCH METER?S .       -VERTICAL BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ARE NONSTANDARD DESIGN.   APPLICANT ENGINEER WOULD NEED TO DESIGN AND VERIFY   SETUP.       -RP BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES GENERALLY CANNOT BE INSTALLED   ENTIRELY VERTICALLY. SOME SPECIALTY MAKE/MODELS MAY   HAVE AN OFFSET VERTICAL SHAPE. PROPOSED BACKFLOW   ASSEMBLY WOULD NEED TO BE USC APPROVED FOR THE   MAKE/MODEL, SIZE, AND ORIENTATION.       -LANDSCAPING MAY BE BLOCKING SIGHT AND ACCESSIBILITY TO   BOTH FDCS.       -VERIFY NORTHERN FIRE HYDRANT HAS ADEQUATE CLEARANCE TO   TREES PER STANDARD DETAIL P-8.       -SHOW AND LABEL THE RP BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY FOR IRRIGATION   WATER SERVICE ON PLANS.       -VERIFY THERE WILL ONLY BE ONE FIRELINE WATER SERVICE   TO THE PROPERTY.       -TREES ON LANDSCAPING PLAN STILL LOOK TO BE IN CONFLICT   WITH THE WATER MAIN ON S. OLIVE AVE. INCREASE DISTANCE   AND ADD ROOT BARRIERS.       -GREASE TRAP CLEANOUT APPEARS TO CONFLICT WITH AT&T   UTILITY.       -IRRIGATION WATER SERVICE IS CLOSE TO A TREE.   IRRIGATION METER BOX SHOULD ALSO BE LOCATED CLOSER TO   WATER MAIN.           RESPECTFULLY,       MARK HURLEY   FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR   CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC UTILITIES   561-822-2262     Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-08-2021 Cont ID   Sent By vnoel Date 06-08-2021 Time 09:31 Rev Time   Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-06-08 09:31:45 Z21050015 - FLAGLER TOWER REZONING 1315 S FLAGLER   INITIAL REVIEW       1. THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF   REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY   AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND   WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. TO VIEW   DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER   ENGINEERING RELATED DOCUMENTS, GO HERE:   HTTPS://WWW.WPB.ORG/GOVERNMENT/ENGINEERING   2. CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH,   FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08, ADOPTED   SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18) CHAPTER 90   UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. SEC. 90-7.   POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER SERVICE   FACILITIES OF THE CITY:   THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE   CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY   BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,   BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.   3. AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH   CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,   STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR   MORE INFORMATION, GO TO:   HTTPS://WWW.WPB.ORG/GOVERNMENT/ENGINEERING   4. PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY   OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC   RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF   YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE   MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL   IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT   [email protected] OR 561-494-1040 FOR FURTHER   ASSISTANCE.   5. PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS   OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES,   INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND   SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES,   METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE   SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING   GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS,   ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL   INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER   LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE   PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN   VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.   PLEASE SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT   MATERIAL. ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL   EXISTING AND PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT,   INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &   TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE   RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL   UTILITY CROSSINGS.   6. CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY   ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY   ROW.   7. PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE   DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB   DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION).   8. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND   PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM   AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE   PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER.   9. SHOW VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION INFORMATION   (NAVD 88 AND NGVD 29).   10. PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND   STORMWATER ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE.   11. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND   IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED   AREAS.   12. PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR   PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.   13. PLEASE LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE   APPLICABLE.   14. PLEASE PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED   LOCATION OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION.   15. COORDINATE WITH MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE   SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING   PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT   HIM AT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]   16. PROVIDE DEDICATED UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS   FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS.       FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR   CONCERNS, THANKS.   RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES   DEPARTMENT, (561) 494-1098 [email protected]       THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD   CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES,   PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]:   COMMENTS AS FOLLOWS:           -WILL THERE BE ANY WELLS ON SITE?   -WHICH METER WILL THE COOLING TOWER BE FED FROM?   -ON DIANA PL, SITE PLANS SHOWED GATES/DOORS OPENING   INTO ADJACENT PROPERTY. VERIFY THAT IS ALLOWABLE.   -ON SITE PLANS, SEEMED THAT SOME TOWNHOMES AND AMENITY   ROOM DID NOT HAVE DOORS OPENING TO OUTSIDE AT GROUND   LEVEL. IS THAT CORRECT?   -LABEL SOUTHWEST RETAINING WALL ON SITE PLAN.   -PAVEMENT RESTORATION PER STANDARDS WOULD BE NEEDED ON   CURRIE CRESCENT, DIANA PL, AND FLAGLER DR. PLEASE ADD   TO CIVIL PLANS.   -DOES THE AT&T UTILITY ON SITE HAVE AN EASEMENT?   -ON DEMO PLAN THERE IS A LABEL THAT SAYS REMOVE EXIST   SEWER SERVICE BUT POINTS TO NOTHING.   -CANNOT SEE AN EXISTING SEWER LATERAL FOR THE EXISTING   SOUTHERN BUILDING ON CIVIL PLANS. PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL   IF THERE IS ONE.   -ON DEMO PLAN ON THE NORTH SIDE THERE IS NOTATION FOR   GAS REMOVAL. PLEASE SHOW WHERE THE LINE ORIGINATES.   -ON THE UTILITY PLAN, LABEL THE STORMWATER UTILITIES   ADJACENT THE PROPERTY LINE AND IN THE ROW PRIVATE OR   CITY.   -THERE IS A CLEANOUT ON EAST SIDE THAT IS NOT LABELED   ON UTILITY PLAN.   -IS AN ADDITIONAL CLEANOUT NEEDED AT THE FLAGLER SEWER   LATERAL TO MATCH THE OTHER LATERAL?   -LABEL MANHOLES WITH ELEVATION INFORMATION.   -POSSIBLE CONFLICT WITH MANHOLE AND CURB AT FLAGLER DR.   -SHOW AND LABEL ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GATE VALVES   ON WATER MAINS NEAR THE PROPERTY   -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL LABEL THE FIRELINE   POINT OF SERVICE GATE VALVE.   -SHOW AND LABEL ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED FIRE   HYDRANTS.   -LABEL WHAT EACH WATER METER WILL BE USED FOR OR   FEEDING.   -DDCV CANNOT BE DOWNSTREAM OF 6 INCH METER. MUST BE ON   SEPARATE TAP/LINE.   -ADD SIZE OF DDCV TO LABEL.   -LARGE METERS OVER 3 INCHES NEED TO BE INSTALLED   ABOVE-GROUND.   -SHOW ALL BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES FOR DOMESTIC/GENERAL   WATER USE AND LABEL WITH RP TYPE.   -CONSIDER DUAL/PARALLEL BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES FOR LARGE   DOMESTIC METERS TO MINIMIZE WATER OUTAGES DURING   BACKFLOW MAINTENANCE.   -ONE GREASE TRAP HAS A CLEANOUTS ON BOTH SIDES, BUT THE   OTHER DOES NOT. IS THAT ALRIGHT?   -LOTS OF TREES ARE PLANTED OVER PRIVATE UTILITY PIPING   NEAR DRIVEWAYS AND COULD CREATE MAINTENANCE PROBLEM IN   FUTURE.   -APPEAR TO BE TREE CONFLICTS AT WEST SIDE OF PROPERTY ?   ESPECIALLY WITH OAK TREE THAT IS PROPOSED TO BE   RELOCATED CLOSE TO SANITARY SEWER PIPE.   -UTILITY EASEMENT NEEDED FOR PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT.   -PLEASE LABEL 6 INCH WATER SERVICE LINE AND TAP IN THE   DRIVEWAY.   -IRRIGATION PLAN SHOWS 1.5 INCH METER. IS IT PRIVATE   SUB METER OR CITY? ALSO SHOW IT ON UTILITY PLAN.   -ON SHEET C500 THE RETAINING WALL LINE IS NOT POINTED   CORRECTLY IN THE DETAIL.   -ADD ELEVATION DATUM STATEMENT TO UTILITY PLAN.   -SHOW SEPARATE ENLARGED DETAIL AREA FOR WATER METERS   AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES.   -APPEARS TO BE TREE CONFLICTS WITH UTILITIES NEAR WATER   METERS AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES.   -FPL EASEMENT WOULD NEED TO BE VACATED TO ALLOW   BUILDING OF STRUCTURES.   -HOW WIDE IS SIDEWALK NEAR PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT AND   FDC?   -WATER MAIN TAP DOES NOT APPEAR LARGE ENOUGH FOR THE   METERS.   -ADD WATER SERVICE STANDARD DETAIL FOR LARGE   ABOVE-GROUND DOMESTIC METER.   -THERE ARE UTILITY MAINTENANCE CONFLICTS WITH RETAINING   WALLS AND STORMWATER AND WATER UTILITIES.   -WOULD BACKHOE BE ABLE TO ACCESS METER AREA FOR   MAINTENANCE WITHOUT DAMAGING MOTOR POOL AREA?   -WILL THE NE SURVEY BENCHMARK REMAIN AFTER   CONSTRUCTION?   -SOME SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS SAY 109 UNITS OR 108 DWELLING   UNITS, BUT ANOTHER LISTING SAID 100 UNITS, PLUS 10   GUESTHOUSES AND 9 TOWNHOMES. PLEASE CLARIFY AND MAKE   SURE WATER DEMAND CALCULATIONS AGREE.   -SHOW EXISTING METERED WATER SERVICE FOR THE NORTH   BUILDING AND LABEL WITH WHAT IS HAPPENING TO IT.           RESPECTFULLY,       MARK HURLEY   FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR   CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC UTILITIES   561-822-2262             Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT Rev No 2 Status P Date 07-26-2021 Cont ID   Sent By pleduc Date 07-26-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By pleduc Date 07-26-2021 Time 09:08 Sent To   Notes 2021-07-26 09:10:04 FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES.       FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES NOT   CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.       FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT THE   APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE   REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.       PETER LEDUC   FIRE MARSHAL   561-804-4709   [email protected]     Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-09-2021 Cont ID   Sent By pleduc Date 06-09-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By pleduc Date 06-09-2021 Time 14:26 Sent To   Notes 2021-06-09 14:36:27 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,   FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM   BEACH FIRE RESCUE.       THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE   DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS   ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.       THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE   PROPOSED PROJECT; HOWEVER, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE   PROVIDED AND MAY NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATIONS WHERE   APPLICABLE.       UNFORTUNATELY I COULD NOT VIEW MOST OF THE SUBMITTALS   AS I WAS EXPERIENCING IT PROBLEMS.       1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY   WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE   PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A   PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED   TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN   STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY   MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER   PROTECTION.       2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY   IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING   ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.       3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM   ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.   ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND   AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT   WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.       4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE   REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE   ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.       5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH   THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,   INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.       6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,   PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,   INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE   OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)       7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA   14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS   STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE   BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE   BEING CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED   TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE   PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.   IT IS RECOMMENDED FOR HIGH RISES HAVE TWO SEPARATE FDC   LOCATIONS REMOTELY LOCATED.       7A. PER NFPA 14   6.4.5.4* FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED   NOT MORE THAN 100 FT (30.5 M) FROM THE NEAREST FIRE   HYDRANT CONNECTED TO AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY.       7B. I WAS ABLE TO VIEW THE PROPOSED HYDRANT AND FDC ON   THE WEST SIDE. DUE THE SIZE OF THE PROPOSED A 2ND FDC   IS REQUEST ALONGFLAGLER FOR FIRE GROUND OPERATIONS. I   WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE A 2ND HYDRANT FOR THAT FDC.       7C. PER NFPA 1   18.3 WATER SUPPLIES.   18.3.1* AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING   THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE   PROVIDED TO ALL PREMISES UPON WHICH FACILITIES,   BUILDINGS, OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS ARE HEREAFTER   CONSTRUCTED OR MOVED INTO THE JURISDICTION. THE   APPROVED WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH   SECTION 18.4.   PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004,   FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE   POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF   APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT,   CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR   AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER   SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA)   AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS   PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS.   FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE   PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?       7D. THE LOCATION OF THE DDCV FIRE LINE LOCATION SHALL   MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE   COORDINATED WITH THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S   ENGINEERS OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S   PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE.       8. A CLASS ?A? NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM   SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP   DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND   APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY   INSTALLATION.       9. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7   KEYWAY SYSTEM.   ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S   EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA   B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.   ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN   WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL   LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET   MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER   ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN   AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE   IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.       10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL   BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL   DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,   EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A   PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE   SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.       11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS   DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED   ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF   FIRE PREVENTION.       ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS   DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE   BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND   FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET   OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER   ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES.       12. COMMAND ROOM - THE COMMAND ROOM SHOULD BE   ACCESSIBLE FROM THE EXTERIOR.       THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1,   CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN   THE FOLLOWING FEATURES:   11.9.1 THE LOCATION, DESIGN, CONTENT, AND FIRE   DEPARTMENT ACCESS OF THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL   BE APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.       11.9.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE SEPARATED   FROM THE REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING BY A FIRE BARRIER   HAVING A FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 1   HOUR.       11.9.3 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER ROOM SHALL BE A   MINIMUM OF 96 FT2 (8.9 M2) WITH A MINIMUM DIMENSION OF   8 FT (2.4 M).       A. PER FL BLDG CODE;(MORE STRICT) IT SHALL BE A MINIMUM   OF 200 FT SQUARED WITH A MINIMUM DIMENSION OF 10 FT.   B. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.   C. A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED   ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM   D. SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL   FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF   EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING   EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS AND THE LOCATION   OF FIRE WALLS, FIRE BARRIERS, FIRE PARTITIONS, SMOKE   BARRIERS AND SMOKE PARTITIONS   E. A WORK TABLE.   F. IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN   FOR THE BUILDING.   G. THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM   CONTROL UNIT.   H. ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION OF   THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL   I. STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR DISTRIBUTION   SYSTEMS.   J. CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS SIMULTANEOUSLY   K. SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY   PANELS   L. EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS   M. FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS   N. GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND   TRANSFER FEATURES.   O. PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED   BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE   P. CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL   Q. ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME   A17.1.   R. ELEVATOR EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER SELECTOR   SWITCH(ES), WHERE EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER IS   PROVIDED   11.8.6* EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER.   11.8.6.1 AN EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE PROVIDED   IN A   LOCATION APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.   11.8.6.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL CONTAIN THE   FOLLOWING:   (1) VOICE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM PANELS AND CONTROLS   (2) FIRE DEPARTMENT TWO-WAY TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION   SERVICE   PANELS AND CONTROLS WHERE REQUIRED BY ANOTHER SECTION   OF THIS   CODE   (3) FIRE DETECTION AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATION   PANELS   (4) ELEVATOR FLOOR LOCATION AND OPERATION ANNUNCIATORS   (5) ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME   A17.1/CSA B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS AND ESCALATORS   (6) ELEVATOR EMERGENCY POWER SELECTOR SWITCH(ES) WHERE   PROVIDED   IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME A17.1/CSA B44   (7) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATERFLOW ANNUNCIATORS   (8) EMERGENCY GENERATOR STATUS INDICATORS   (9) CONTROLS FOR ANY AUTOMATIC STAIRWAY DOOR UNLOCKING   SYSTEM   (10) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS   (11) TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED   ACCESS TO THE   PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM   (12) STAIRWAY VIDEO MONITORING EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED BY   11.8.8       13. TWO-WAY RADIO ENHANCEMENT   NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY   RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.   11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM   RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT   COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL   DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.   NFPA 72, 24.5.2* TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS   ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS.   24.5.2.2 RADIO COVERAGE. RADIO COVERAGE SHALL BE   PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE BUILDING AS A PERCENTAGE OF   FLOOR AREA AS SPECIFIED IN 24.5.2.2.1 THROUGH   24.5.2.2.3.   24.5.2.2.1 CRITICAL AREAS. CRITICAL AREAS, SUCH AS THE   EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER(S), THE FIRE PUMP ROOM(S),   EXIT STAIRS, EXIT PASSAGEWAYS, ELEVATOR LOBBIES,   STANDPIPE CABINETS, SPRINKLER SECTIONAL VALVE   LOCATIONS, AND OTHER AREAS DEEMED CRITICAL BY THE   AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH   99 PERCENT FLOOR AREA RADIO COVERAGE.   24.5.2.2.2 GENERAL BUILDING AREAS. GENERAL BUILDING   AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH 90 PERCENT FLOOR AREA   RADIO COVERAGE.   24.5.2.3 SIGNAL STRENGTH.   24.5.2.3.1 INBOUND. A MINIMUM INBOUND SIGNAL STRENGTH   OF -95 DBM, OR OTHER SIGNAL STRENGTH AS REQUIRED BY THE   AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL BE PROVIDED   THROUGHOUT THE COVERAGE AREA.   24.5.2.3.2 OUTBOUND. A MINIMUM OUTBOUND SIGNAL STRENGTH   OF -95 DBM AT THE DONOR SITE, OR OTHER SIGNAL STRENGTH   AS REQUIRED BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL   BE PROVIDED FROM THE COVERAGE AREA.       THE SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL   STRENGTH FOR THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST PALM BEACH   FIRE RESCUE. TESTING SHALL BE BY AN ACCEPTABLE NATIONAL   STANDARD DOCUMENTING PERCENTAGES NOTED ABOVE AND BY   ACTUAL RADIO TESTING BY FIRE PERSONNEL. IF THE MINIMUM   CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A BI-DIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIED SYSTEM   SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM 2-HOUR RUN TIME   BATTERY BACK-UP.       PLEASE CONTACT MARK FILLA, PALM BEACH COUNTY PUBLIC   SAFETY RADIO SYSTEMS MANAGER, [email protected],   561-233-0837; AS OUR RADIOS OPERATE ON THEIR SYSTEM FOR   DETAILED RADIO FREQUENCY AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.           14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS   BUILDING.   ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS,   PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.       15. THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA   101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE PROTECTION   EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING:   THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED,   INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH   NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204,   STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY   RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR   RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY   HAVING JURISDICTION.   THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE   INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE   APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED   MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE   SYSTEM.   ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL   INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.9.       16. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT   DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.       17. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING   PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH   THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.       PETER LEDUC   FIRE MARSHAL   561-804-4709   [email protected]     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 8 Status P Date 11-08-2021 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 11-08-2021 Time 12:05 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 11-08-2021 Time 12:04 Sent To   Notes 2021-11-08 12:05:15 FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER   561-822-1462   PROJECT: FLAGLER TOWER Z21050015   NOVEMBER 8, 2021   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:       REVIEW: FLAGLER TOWERS 7/20/21   1. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED   2. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED   3. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED   4. SATISFIED. DUE TO THE CONSTRUCTION IMPACT ON THE   EXISTING MATURE TREES ON CITY PROPERTY ALONG DIANA PL.   REMOVE FICUS TREES AND REPLACE WITH 1 TO 1 CATEGORY   SHADE TREE. (SEE #5)   7/27/21 RC: PLAN IS ALREADY IN PLACE BETWEEN PLANNING   AND PARKS AND REC. TO REPLACE FICUS WITH GREEN BUTTON   WOOD IN AGREEMENT WITH THE NORTON PARK PLACE CONDO.   APPLICANTS MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FOR TREES ON   NORTH SIDE OF DIANA PLACE.   7/20/2021   6. 7/27/21 RC. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE   TREE DISPOSITION LIST:   ? SATISFIED. SHOW THE DISPOSITION OF TREES #1479 ?   #1530.   ? SATISFIED. IDENTIFY TREE #1504   ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE FOR   TREES AND PALMS LISTED TO BE REMOVED. ON EXISTING TREES   ON SITE LIST AND EXISTING TREES ON ADJACENT SITE LIST.   7. SATISFIED. SEE COMMENT #6 TREE #1479 ON TREE LIST   WILL NEED TO BE LISTED AS REMOVE TO REFLECT DEPICTION   ON THE MAP. PAGE D-1   8. SATISFIED. APPLICANT NEEDS PROVIDE LANDSCAPE PLANS   FOR POOL TERRACE PAGE LA 3-1. THE LANDSCAPING ON THE   AMENITIES LEVEL WILL BE APPROVED WITH PROJECT AND NEEDS   TO BE SUBMITTED.   9. SATISFIED. LIVE OAK TREES ON FLAGLER APPEAR TO BE IN   CONFLICT WITH MAN HOLE COVERS AND STORM WATER LINE.   ADJUST LINE OR TREE LOCATIONS TO BE RESOLVE.   10. SATISFIED. LIVE OAK ON SOUTH SIDE BUFFER APPEARS TO   BE TOO CLOSE TO BUILDING AND ENTRY CANOPY AND WILL   OUTGROW ITS SPACE CREATING A CONFLICT WITH THE BUILDING   AND SHADE CANOPY.   THE TREES DO NOT APPEAR ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET   LG-3.1. IF THIS IS IN ERROR, PROVIDE A MANAGEMENT PLAN   FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE TREES.   11. SATISFIED. IN EAST SIDE COURTYARD THERE IS A STRAY   UNMARKED DIAGONAL LINE GOING ACROSS. IDENTIFY LINE OR   REMOVE IF IT?S NOT INTENTIONAL.   SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER WILL RETURN ON 7/22 PLAN IS   SUBJECT TO HIS REVIEW   7/27/21 RC.   13. SATISFIED. ALL LANDSCAPE PLANS NEED TO BE ON AT   LEAST 1-20 SCALE PLAN AS THE CURRENT SCALE IS NOT   READABLE   14. SATISFIED. SHOW OPEN SPACE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THE   NON-BUILDING AREA OF THE LOT. ADJUST OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM   ON SHEET LR-2. LANDSCAPING OVER BUILDING STRUCTURE IS   NOT COUNTED FOR OPEN SPACE. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM SHOWING   LANDSCAPED AREAS.   15. SATISFIED. USING THE OPEN SPACE SQUARE FOOTAGE   CALCULATE THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED SHADE TREES, FLOWERING   TREES AND SHRUBS PER SECTION 94-442 (C) (2) B. ADD THE   TOTAL TREES REQUIRED FOR OPEN SPACE AND FOR MULTIFAMILY   REQUIREMENT AND SHOW THE TOTAL REQUIRED TREES.   16. SATISFIED. SHOW THE PROVIDED LINEAR FEET OF   LANDSCAPING FOR THE BUILDING PERIMETER.   ABOVE GROUND POTS AND PLANTERS MAY NOT BE COUNTED AS   PERIMETER LANDSCAPE. THERE ARE AREAS ADJACENT TO THE   BUILDING ON THE OLIVE SIDE AND SHOWN AS PLANTINGS THAT   DO NOT APPEAR AS OPENINGS IN THE PAVED AREAS. CLEARLY   IDENTIFY THESE AREAS AND RECALCULATE THE PERIMETER   LANDSCAPE.   17. SATISFIED. ADD A NATIVE COLUMN TO THE PLANT   SCHEDULE SO STAFF CAN VERIFY REQUIREMENTS.   18. SATISFIED. MAGNOLIA MAY BE COUNTED AS NATIVE.   19. SATISFIED. FLORIDA FRIENDLY REQUIREMENTS. PROVIDE   AN AREA PLAN SHOWING THE SOD AREAS AS PART OF THE TOTAL   LANDSCAPE AREA AND PROVIDE THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE. ITEM   6B DOES NOT APPLY.   ITEM 6B STILL DOES NOT APPLY.   20. SATISFIED. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON SEA   PLUM TREE IN ORDER TO IDENTIFY IF IT IS A CULTIVAR OF   SEA GRAPE.   21. SATISFIED. TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES PROVIDED NEEDS TO   BE SHOWN FROM THE PLANT LIST. CURRENT COUNT IS 92 TREES   PLUS 11 CABBAGE PALMS AT 3:1 FOR A TOTAL OF 95. SHOW   RELOCATED TREES ON THE PLANT LIST. SHOW OFFSITE TREES   ON THE PLANT LIST. IF REQUIRED TREES ARE NOT TO BE   PROVIDED ON SITE A WAVER MUST BE REQUESTED.   22. SATISFIED. THE TREES PROVIDED ON THE AMENITY AREA   ON FLAGLER NEED TO BE SPREAD OUT TO PROVIDE SHADE FOR   PEDESTRIANS.   THE INTENT FOR THE OVERALL PEDESTRIAN PLAN FOR THE CITY   IS TO PROVIDE TREE CANOPY SHADE OVER PUBLIC AREAS AND   PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALKS. THE LARGE GAP ADJACENT TO THE   PLAZA DOES NOT MEET THIS INTENT. STAFF DOES NOT   RECOGNIZE HAVING THE TREES IN FRONT OF THE PLAZA AS A   SAFETY ISSUE, AS THE TREES WOULD MEET CPTED (CRIME   PREVENTION THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN)   RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE TREE BRANCHING TO BE ABOVE 7   FEET. PEDESTRIAN ENJOYMENT OF THE PUBLIC WALKWAY ALSO   OUTWEIGHS THE NEEDS OF THE PROPERTY OWNER TO EXPOSE THE   ARCHITECTURE OF THE BUILDING.   23. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. TRANSPLANTED OAK TREE   #1538 APPEARS TO BE PROBLEMATIC IN THE SPECIFIED   LOCATION THAT IT WILL CONFLICT WITH THE BUILDING   CONSTRUCTION. TRANSPLANTED TREES MAY BE RELOCATED OFF   SITE. THIS APPEARS THIS COULD ALSO BE AN ISSUE WITH THE   OTHER RELOCATED TREES AND PALMS.   THE APPLICANT HAS A NOTE PLACED ON THE PLANS FOR   TEMPORARY STORAGE OF THE RELOCATED TREES. PROVIDE A   MORE DETAILED PLAN ON HOW THIS WILL BE IMPLEMENTED. THE   RELOCATED LIVE OAK IS SHOWN WITH PAVING PROPOSED OVER   THE ROOT SYSTEM AT ITS NEW LOCATION THAT WILL NOT BE   PRACTICAL OR HEALTHY FOR THE TREE. THE RENDERINGS SHOW   GRASS AREA. A SUSPENDED PAVING SYSTEM OR SOIL CELLS   MUST BE PROVIDED IF THE TREE IS TO BE SUSTAINABLE.   PROVIDE THE RELOCATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE   TREES BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER RELOCATION AND INCLUDE   IT ON THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN.   THE APPLICANT HAS PROVIDED INFORMATION IN THE COMMENT   RESPONSES, BUT THAT INFORMATION NEEDS TO BE IN A   MANAGEMENT PLAN SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/18/21:   24. SATISFIED. TREE COUNT ON THE PLANT LIST OF 29 LIVE   OAK TREES DOES NOT MATCH THE PLAN SHOWING 30 TREES.   25. SATISFIED. THE SIDEWALK PROPOSED ALONG OLIVE AVE.   APPEARS TO BE TOO CLOSE TO EXISTING TREES AND PALMS.   PROVIDE MORE DETAIL ON HOW THIS WILL BE ADDRESSED.   SITE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH ADJUSTED SIDEWALK ON THE   LANDSCAPE PLAN.   26. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND   MOUNTED EQUIPMENT INCLUDING WATER AND FIRE BACKFLOWS ON   THE CURRIE CRESCENT SIDE OF THE BUILDING.   27. SATISFIED. VINES ARE SHOWN ON THE RENDERINGS ON THE   WALL OF THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING, BUT NO PLANTS   ARE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. CORRECT TO SHOW THE   PLANTINGS.   28. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL MITIGATION DUE FOR THE   ON SITE TREES AND PALMS TO BE REMOVED. ADONIDIA PALMS   ARE CATEGORY 4 AND REQUIRE 50 SQ FT CANOPY MITIGATION   PER TRUNK, SPANISH CHERRY IS LISTED UNDER CATEGORY 1   AND REQUIRES 300 SQ FT CANOPY MITIGATION. PROVIDE THE   LIST OF TREES ADDED TO THE SITE AND ASSIGN THE CANOPY   CREDITS BASED ON THE CATEGORY AND PROVIDE THE TOTAL.   THERE ARE CORRECTIONS REQUIRED FOR THE ONSITE AND   OFFSITE MITIGATION CALCULATIONS.   CALCULATIONS FOR THE MITIGATION PROVIDED ON SITE BASED   ON THE PLANT LIST SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM SHEET L-3.4   AND PLACED IN A CHART ON SHEET D-2. SABAL PALMS ARE   CATEGORY 3 AND ARE 100 SQ FT CREDIT. TOTAL EXCESS OF   TREE CANOPY NEEDS TO BE SHOWN.   29. THE PLANTING PLANS FOR THE OFF SITE TREES NEED TO   BE REVISED TO SHOW THE FOLLOWING:   ? SATISFIED. THE ROYAL PALMS BETWEEN THE GREEN   BUTTONWOOD TREES ARE NOT APPROPRIATE TO DUPLICATE THE   CURRENT LOOK OF THE TREE CANOPY AND THEY WOULD PRESENT   A SAFETY AND MAINTENANCE ISSUE OVER THE PAVEMENT AND   PARKING SPACES. REMOVE THE ROW OF PALMS ADJACENT TO THE   CURB.   THERE IS A GAP IN THE TREE CANOPY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF   ACTION PL. ADJACENT TO THE ANGLED PARKING SPACES. GREEN   BUTTONWOOD TREES MUST BE PLACED ALONG THIS AREA   REPLACING THE ROYAL PALMS.       ? SATISFIED. THERE IS NOT ENOUGH ROOM PROVIDED FOR THE   ROOT ZONE OF THE TREES. THE SIDEWALK NEEDS TO BE PUSHED   FARTHER AWAY FROM THE CURB (10 TO 12 FEET) ALLOWING   ENOUGH ROOT SPACE FOR THE TREES AND THE NARROWER   LANDSCAPE AREA ON THE BACK OF SIDEWALK. ROYAL PALMS   COULD BE PLACED IN THIS STRIP, BUT THEY WOULD HAVE TO   BE FAR ENOUGH AWAY FROM THE SIDEWALK TO AVOID FRONDS   DROPPING ON THE SIDEWALK.   ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL TREE CANOPY MITIGATION   DUE FOR THE REMOVED TREES AND PROVIDE THE MITIGATION   SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED FOR THE NEW TREES AND PALMS   PROPOSED. IF THERE IS MITIGATION DUE, STAFF WILL   DISCUSS OPTIONS TO ADDRESS IT.   THERE ARE CORRECTIONS REQUIRED FOR THE ONSITE AND   OFFSITE MITIGATION CALCULATIONS.       SHOW THE TOTAL MITIGATION DUE AFTER CREDITS ON SHEET   D-2.       ? SATISFIED. INCREASING THE NUMBER OF GREEN BUTTONWOOD   TREES AND ROYAL PALMS WOULD INCREASE THE PUBLIC   BENEFITS AND THE AESTHETICS.   ? SATISFIED. EXPLAIN WHY THERE IS A GAP ON THE CORNER   OF OLIVE AND DIANA WITH NO TREE CANOPY PROVIDED. THIS   WAS A LOCATION SUGGESTED BY STAFF FOR THE RELOCATED   LIVE OAK TREE.           CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.       2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR   THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE STREET TREES,   LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION IN THE RIGHT OF WAY AND ON   THE CITY PARCEL ADJACENT TO THE SITE APPROVED WITH THIS   PETITION.   3. SEE CONDITION #5. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREET TREES,   LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION IN THE RIGHT OF WAY AND ON   THE CITY PARCEL ADJACENT TO THE SITE APPROVED WITH THIS   PETITION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE   AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY THAT MUST BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO   THE FINAL CO FOR THE BUILDING.   4. SATISFIED. PRIOR TO SCHEDULING FOR CITY COMMISSION,   THE APPLICANT SHALL REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLANS TO SHOW   THE ROYAL PALMS AS 1:1 CREDIT TOWARD TREES PER SECTION   94-442 (D) AND CORRECT THE TREE COUNTS FOR OFF SITE   PALMS ON SHEET L-3.4 TO 44.   5. PRIOR TO SCHEDULING FOR CITY COMMISSION, THE   APPLICANT SHALL MAKE THE FOLLOWING REVISIONS TO THE   TREE RELOCATION MANAGEMENT PLAN:   A) LIVE OAK TREE #1536:   IF OPTION #1 TO KEEP THE TREE IN ITS CURRENT LOCATION   IS TO BE FINAL,   1) THE TREE RELOCATION MANAGEMENT PLAN WILL BE REVISED   TO REFLECT THIS CHOICE AND ADJUSTED TO ITEMIZE ALL   ACTIONS TO BE COMPLETED AT EACH STAGE OF CONSTRUCTION.   2) ALL PLANS MUST BE AMENDED TO SHOW THE PERMANENT   LOCATION.   3) THE TREE WILL BE MONITORED DAILY AND A WEEKLY REPORT   SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ON THE CONDITION UNTIL THE FINAL   LANDSCAPE INSPECTION.   IF OPTION #2 TO RELOCATE THE TREE TO A LOCATION NEAR   THE SITE IS TO BE FINAL,   1) THE TREE RELOCATION MANAGEMENT PLAN WILL BE REVISED   TO REFLECT THIS CHOICE AND ADJUSTED TO ITEMIZE ALL   ACTIONS TO BE COMPLETED AT EACH STAGE OF CONSTRUCTION.   2) ALL PLANS MUST BE AMENDED TO SHOW THE PERMANENT   LOCATION.   3) THE TREE SHALL BE MONITORED DAILY AND A WEEKLY   REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ON THE CONDITION UNTIL THE   FINAL LANDSCAPE INSPECTION AND MAINTAINED THEREAFTER IN   ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-448 (E)3   FOR ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF PLANTING IN THE FINAL   LOCATION.   SINCE OPTION #3 IS NOT SUPPORTED BY THE ARBORIST OR THE   CITY AS PREFERABLE, THIS SHALL NOT BE AN OPTION AND   SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE REPORT.   B) MAHOGANY TREES #1502, 1503, 1507, 1520, 1539, AND   1540:       1) IF THE TREES ARE TO BE MOVED TO A TEMPORARY HOLDING   AREA, THE LOCATION OF THE TEMPORARY HOLDING AREA SHALL   BE ESTABLISHED AND AGREEMENTS FOR STORAGE OF THE TREES   ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY SHALL BE ESTABLISHED WITH THE   OWNER OF THE PROPERTY.   2) THE TREE RELOCATION MANAGEMENT PLAN WILL BE REVISED   TO REFLECT THIS CHOICE AND ADJUSTED TO ITEMIZE ALL   ACTIONS TO BE COMPLETED AT EACH STAGE OF CONSTRUCTION.       3) THE TREES SHALL BE MONITORED DAILY AND A WEEKLY   REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ON THEIR CONDITION UNTIL   THE FINAL LANDSCAPE INSPECTION AND MONITORED THEREAFTER   IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-448   (E)3 FOR ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF PLANTING IN THE   FINAL LOCATION.       C) SABAL PALMS (34):       1) IF THE PALMS ARE TO BE MOVED TO A TEMPORARY HOLDING   AREA, THE LOCATION OF THE TEMPORARY HOLDING AREA SHALL   BE ESTABLISHED AND AGREEMENTS FOR STORAGE OF THE TREES   ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY SHALL BE ESTABLISHED WITH THE   OWNER OF THE PROPERTY.   2) IF THE PALMS ARE TO BE TRANSPORTED TO A COMMERCIAL   NURSERY OFF SITE, THE CONTRACTOR AND NURSERY SHALL BE   IDENTIFIED.   3) THE TREE RELOCATION MANAGEMENT PLAN WILL BE REVISED   TO REFLECT THIS CHOICE AND ADJUSTED TO ITEMIZE ALL   ACTIONS TO BE COMPLETED AT EACH STAGE OF CONSTRUCTION.   4) THE PALMS SHALL BE MONITORED DAILY AND A WEEKLY   REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ON THEIR CONDITION UNTIL   THE FINAL LANDSCAPE INSPECTION AND MONITORED THEREAFTER   IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-448   (E)3 FOR ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF PLANTING IN THE   FINAL LOCATION.       1. SATISFIED. A LETTER SIGNED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER OF   1531 S OLIVE AVENUE INDICATING THAT THEY WILL ACCEPT   THE LIVE OAK TREE FOR RELOCATION TO THEIR PROPERTY AND   WILL ACCEPT OWNERSHIP AND MAINTAIN IT FOLLOWING THE   REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY.   2. SATISFIED. 2.5 IRRIGATION C. WILL BE AMENDED TO   INDICATE THAT RELOCATED TREES SHALL HAVE THE ENTIRE   ROOTBALL IRRIGATED ADEQUATELY UNTIL ESTABLISHMENT.   3. SATISFIED. A SITE VISIT REVEALED THAT TREES #1539   AND #1540 ARE CALLOPHYLLUM TREES, NOT MAHOGANY.   CORRECTIONS MUST BE MADE TO ALL PLANS.     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 7 Status P Date 09-29-2021 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 09-29-2021 Time 14:19 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 09-29-2021 Time 14:19 Sent To   Notes 2021-09-29 14:21:02 FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER   561-822-1462   PROJECT: FLAGLER TOWER Z21050015   SEPTEMBER 29, 2021   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:       REVIEW: FLAGLER TOWERS 7/20/21   1. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED   2. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED   3. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED   4. SATISFIED. DUE TO THE CONSTRUCTION IMPACT ON THE   EXISTING MATURE TREES ON CITY PROPERTY ALONG DIANA PL.   REMOVE FICUS TREES AND REPLACE WITH 1 TO 1 CATEGORY   SHADE TREE. (SEE #5)   7/27/21 RC: PLAN IS ALREADY IN PLACE BETWEEN PLANNING   AND PARKS AND REC. TO REPLACE FICUS WITH GREEN BUTTON   WOOD IN AGREEMENT WITH THE NORTON PARK PLACE CONDO.   APPLICANTS MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FOR TREES ON   NORTH SIDE OF DIANA PLACE.   7/20/2021   6. 7/27/21 RC. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE   TREE DISPOSITION LIST:   ? SATISFIED. SHOW THE DISPOSITION OF TREES #1479 ?   #1530.   ? SATISFIED. IDENTIFY TREE #1504   ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE FOR   TREES AND PALMS LISTED TO BE REMOVED. ON EXISTING TREES   ON SITE LIST AND EXISTING TREES ON ADJACENT SITE LIST.   7. SATISFIED. SEE COMMENT #6 TREE #1479 ON TREE LIST   WILL NEED TO BE LISTED AS REMOVE TO REFLECT DEPICTION   ON THE MAP. PAGE D-1   8. SATISFIED. APPLICANT NEEDS PROVIDE LANDSCAPE PLANS   FOR POOL TERRACE PAGE LA 3-1. THE LANDSCAPING ON THE   AMENITIES LEVEL WILL BE APPROVED WITH PROJECT AND NEEDS   TO BE SUBMITTED.   9. SATISFIED. LIVE OAK TREES ON FLAGLER APPEAR TO BE IN   CONFLICT WITH MAN HOLE COVERS AND STORM WATER LINE.   ADJUST LINE OR TREE LOCATIONS TO BE RESOLVE.   10. SATISFIED. LIVE OAK ON SOUTH SIDE BUFFER APPEARS TO   BE TOO CLOSE TO BUILDING AND ENTRY CANOPY AND WILL   OUTGROW ITS SPACE CREATING A CONFLICT WITH THE BUILDING   AND SHADE CANOPY.   THE TREES DO NOT APPEAR ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET   LG-3.1. IF THIS IS IN ERROR, PROVIDE A MANAGEMENT PLAN   FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE TREES.   11. SATISFIED. IN EAST SIDE COURTYARD THERE IS A STRAY   UNMARKED DIAGONAL LINE GOING ACROSS. IDENTIFY LINE OR   REMOVE IF IT?S NOT INTENTIONAL.   SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER WILL RETURN ON 7/22 PLAN IS   SUBJECT TO HIS REVIEW   7/27/21 RC.   13. SATISFIED. ALL LANDSCAPE PLANS NEED TO BE ON AT   LEAST 1-20 SCALE PLAN AS THE CURRENT SCALE IS NOT   READABLE   14. SATISFIED. SHOW OPEN SPACE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THE   NON-BUILDING AREA OF THE LOT. ADJUST OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM   ON SHEET LR-2. LANDSCAPING OVER BUILDING STRUCTURE IS   NOT COUNTED FOR OPEN SPACE. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM SHOWING   LANDSCAPED AREAS.   15. SATISFIED. USING THE OPEN SPACE SQUARE FOOTAGE   CALCULATE THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED SHADE TREES, FLOWERING   TREES AND SHRUBS PER SECTION 94-442 (C) (2) B. ADD THE   TOTAL TREES REQUIRED FOR OPEN SPACE AND FOR MULTIFAMILY   REQUIREMENT AND SHOW THE TOTAL REQUIRED TREES.   16. SATISFIED. SHOW THE PROVIDED LINEAR FEET OF   LANDSCAPING FOR THE BUILDING PERIMETER.   ABOVE GROUND POTS AND PLANTERS MAY NOT BE COUNTED AS   PERIMETER LANDSCAPE. THERE ARE AREAS ADJACENT TO THE   BUILDING ON THE OLIVE SIDE AND SHOWN AS PLANTINGS THAT   DO NOT APPEAR AS OPENINGS IN THE PAVED AREAS. CLEARLY   IDENTIFY THESE AREAS AND RECALCULATE THE PERIMETER   LANDSCAPE.   17. SATISFIED. ADD A NATIVE COLUMN TO THE PLANT   SCHEDULE SO STAFF CAN VERIFY REQUIREMENTS.   18. SATISFIED. MAGNOLIA MAY BE COUNTED AS NATIVE.   19. SATISFIED. FLORIDA FRIENDLY REQUIREMENTS. PROVIDE   AN AREA PLAN SHOWING THE SOD AREAS AS PART OF THE TOTAL   LANDSCAPE AREA AND PROVIDE THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE. ITEM   6B DOES NOT APPLY.   ITEM 6B STILL DOES NOT APPLY.   20. SATISFIED. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON SEA   PLUM TREE IN ORDER TO IDENTIFY IF IT IS A CULTIVAR OF   SEA GRAPE.   21. SATISFIED. TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES PROVIDED NEEDS TO   BE SHOWN FROM THE PLANT LIST. CURRENT COUNT IS 92 TREES   PLUS 11 CABBAGE PALMS AT 3:1 FOR A TOTAL OF 95. SHOW   RELOCATED TREES ON THE PLANT LIST. SHOW OFFSITE TREES   ON THE PLANT LIST. IF REQUIRED TREES ARE NOT TO BE   PROVIDED ON SITE A WAVER MUST BE REQUESTED.   22. SATISFIED. THE TREES PROVIDED ON THE AMENITY AREA   ON FLAGLER NEED TO BE SPREAD OUT TO PROVIDE SHADE FOR   PEDESTRIANS.   THE INTENT FOR THE OVERALL PEDESTRIAN PLAN FOR THE CITY   IS TO PROVIDE TREE CANOPY SHADE OVER PUBLIC AREAS AND   PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALKS. THE LARGE GAP ADJACENT TO THE   PLAZA DOES NOT MEET THIS INTENT. STAFF DOES NOT   RECOGNIZE HAVING THE TREES IN FRONT OF THE PLAZA AS A   SAFETY ISSUE, AS THE TREES WOULD MEET CPTED (CRIME   PREVENTION THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN)   RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE TREE BRANCHING TO BE ABOVE 7   FEET. PEDESTRIAN ENJOYMENT OF THE PUBLIC WALKWAY ALSO   OUTWEIGHS THE NEEDS OF THE PROPERTY OWNER TO EXPOSE THE   ARCHITECTURE OF THE BUILDING.   23. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. TRANSPLANTED OAK TREE   #1538 APPEARS TO BE PROBLEMATIC IN THE SPECIFIED   LOCATION THAT IT WILL CONFLICT WITH THE BUILDING   CONSTRUCTION. TRANSPLANTED TREES MAY BE RELOCATED OFF   SITE. THIS APPEARS THIS COULD ALSO BE AN ISSUE WITH THE   OTHER RELOCATED TREES AND PALMS.   THE APPLICANT HAS A NOTE PLACED ON THE PLANS FOR   TEMPORARY STORAGE OF THE RELOCATED TREES. PROVIDE A   MORE DETAILED PLAN ON HOW THIS WILL BE IMPLEMENTED. THE   RELOCATED LIVE OAK IS SHOWN WITH PAVING PROPOSED OVER   THE ROOT SYSTEM AT ITS NEW LOCATION THAT WILL NOT BE   PRACTICAL OR HEALTHY FOR THE TREE. THE RENDERINGS SHOW   GRASS AREA. A SUSPENDED PAVING SYSTEM OR SOIL CELLS   MUST BE PROVIDED IF THE TREE IS TO BE SUSTAINABLE.   PROVIDE THE RELOCATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE   TREES BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER RELOCATION AND INCLUDE   IT ON THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN.   THE APPLICANT HAS PROVIDED INFORMATION IN THE COMMENT   RESPONSES, BUT THAT INFORMATION NEEDS TO BE IN A   MANAGEMENT PLAN SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/18/21:   24. SATISFIED. TREE COUNT ON THE PLANT LIST OF 29 LIVE   OAK TREES DOES NOT MATCH THE PLAN SHOWING 30 TREES.   25. SATISFIED. THE SIDEWALK PROPOSED ALONG OLIVE AVE.   APPEARS TO BE TOO CLOSE TO EXISTING TREES AND PALMS.   PROVIDE MORE DETAIL ON HOW THIS WILL BE ADDRESSED.   SITE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH ADJUSTED SIDEWALK ON THE   LANDSCAPE PLAN.   26. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND   MOUNTED EQUIPMENT INCLUDING WATER AND FIRE BACKFLOWS ON   THE CURRIE CRESCENT SIDE OF THE BUILDING.   27. SATISFIED. VINES ARE SHOWN ON THE RENDERINGS ON THE   WALL OF THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING, BUT NO PLANTS   ARE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. CORRECT TO SHOW THE   PLANTINGS.   28. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL MITIGATION DUE FOR THE   ON SITE TREES AND PALMS TO BE REMOVED. ADONIDIA PALMS   ARE CATEGORY 4 AND REQUIRE 50 SQ FT CANOPY MITIGATION   PER TRUNK, SPANISH CHERRY IS LISTED UNDER CATEGORY 1   AND REQUIRES 300 SQ FT CANOPY MITIGATION. PROVIDE THE   LIST OF TREES ADDED TO THE SITE AND ASSIGN THE CANOPY   CREDITS BASED ON THE CATEGORY AND PROVIDE THE TOTAL.   THERE ARE CORRECTIONS REQUIRED FOR THE ONSITE AND   OFFSITE MITIGATION CALCULATIONS.   CALCULATIONS FOR THE MITIGATION PROVIDED ON SITE BASED   ON THE PLANT LIST SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM SHEET L-3.4   AND PLACED IN A CHART ON SHEET D-2. SABAL PALMS ARE   CATEGORY 3 AND ARE 100 SQ FT CREDIT. TOTAL EXCESS OF   TREE CANOPY NEEDS TO BE SHOWN.   29. THE PLANTING PLANS FOR THE OFF SITE TREES NEED TO   BE REVISED TO SHOW THE FOLLOWING:   ? SATISFIED. THE ROYAL PALMS BETWEEN THE GREEN   BUTTONWOOD TREES ARE NOT APPROPRIATE TO DUPLICATE THE   CURRENT LOOK OF THE TREE CANOPY AND THEY WOULD PRESENT   A SAFETY AND MAINTENANCE ISSUE OVER THE PAVEMENT AND   PARKING SPACES. REMOVE THE ROW OF PALMS ADJACENT TO THE   CURB.   THERE IS A GAP IN THE TREE CANOPY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF   ACTION PL. ADJACENT TO THE ANGLED PARKING SPACES. GREEN   BUTTONWOOD TREES MUST BE PLACED ALONG THIS AREA   REPLACING THE ROYAL PALMS.       ? SATISFIED. THERE IS NOT ENOUGH ROOM PROVIDED FOR THE   ROOT ZONE OF THE TREES. THE SIDEWALK NEEDS TO BE PUSHED   FARTHER AWAY FROM THE CURB (10 TO 12 FEET) ALLOWING   ENOUGH ROOT SPACE FOR THE TREES AND THE NARROWER   LANDSCAPE AREA ON THE BACK OF SIDEWALK. ROYAL PALMS   COULD BE PLACED IN THIS STRIP, BUT THEY WOULD HAVE TO   BE FAR ENOUGH AWAY FROM THE SIDEWALK TO AVOID FRONDS   DROPPING ON THE SIDEWALK.   ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL TREE CANOPY MITIGATION   DUE FOR THE REMOVED TREES AND PROVIDE THE MITIGATION   SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED FOR THE NEW TREES AND PALMS   PROPOSED. IF THERE IS MITIGATION DUE, STAFF WILL   DISCUSS OPTIONS TO ADDRESS IT.   THERE ARE CORRECTIONS REQUIRED FOR THE ONSITE AND   OFFSITE MITIGATION CALCULATIONS.       SHOW THE TOTAL MITIGATION DUE AFTER CREDITS ON SHEET   D-2.       ? SATISFIED. INCREASING THE NUMBER OF GREEN BUTTONWOOD   TREES AND ROYAL PALMS WOULD INCREASE THE PUBLIC   BENEFITS AND THE AESTHETICS.   ? SATISFIED. EXPLAIN WHY THERE IS A GAP ON THE CORNER   OF OLIVE AND DIANA WITH NO TREE CANOPY PROVIDED. THIS   WAS A LOCATION SUGGESTED BY STAFF FOR THE RELOCATED   LIVE OAK TREE.           CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.       2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR   THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE STREET TREES,   LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION IN THE RIGHT OF WAY AND ON   THE CITY PARCEL ADJACENT TO THE SITE APPROVED WITH THIS   PETITION.   3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR   THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREET TREES, LANDSCAPING AND   IRRIGATION IN THE RIGHT OF WAY AND ON THE CITY PARCEL   ADJACENT TO THE SITE APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. THIS   WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH   THE CITY THAT MUST BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO THE FINAL CO   FOR THE BUILDING.   4. PRIOR TO SCHEDULING FOR CITY COMMISSION, THE   APPLICANT SHALL REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLANS TO SHOW THE   ROYAL PALMS AS 1:1 CREDIT TOWARD TREES PER SECTION   94-442 (D) AND CORRECT THE TREE COUNTS FOR OFF SITE   PALMS ON SHEET L-3.4 TO 44.   5. PRIOR TO SCHEDULING FOR CITY COMMISSION, THE   APPLICANT SHALL MAKE THE FOLLOWING REVISIONS TO THE   TREE RELOCATION MANAGEMENT PLAN:   A) LIVE OAK TREE #1536:   IF OPTION #1 TO KEEP THE TREE IN ITS CURRENT LOCATION   IS TO BE FINAL,   1) THE TREE RELOCATION MANAGEMENT PLAN WILL BE REVISED   TO REFLECT THIS CHOICE AND ADJUSTED TO ITEMIZE ALL   ACTIONS TO BE COMPLETED AT EACH STAGE OF CONSTRUCTION.   2) ALL PLANS MUST BE AMENDED TO SHOW THE PERMANENT   LOCATION.   3) THE TREE WILL BE MONITORED DAILY AND A WEEKLY REPORT   SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ON THE CONDITION UNTIL THE FINAL   LANDSCAPE INSPECTION.   IF OPTION #2 TO RELOCATE THE TREE TO A LOCATION NEAR   THE SITE IS TO BE FINAL,   1) THE TREE RELOCATION MANAGEMENT PLAN WILL BE REVISED   TO REFLECT THIS CHOICE AND ADJUSTED TO ITEMIZE ALL   ACTIONS TO BE COMPLETED AT EACH STAGE OF CONSTRUCTION.   2) ALL PLANS MUST BE AMENDED TO SHOW THE PERMANENT   LOCATION.   3) THE TREE SHALL BE MONITORED DAILY AND A WEEKLY   REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ON THE CONDITION UNTIL THE   FINAL LANDSCAPE INSPECTION AND MAINTAINED THEREAFTER IN   ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-448 (E)3   FOR ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF PLANTING IN THE FINAL   LOCATION.   SINCE OPTION #3 IS NOT SUPPORTED BY THE ARBORIST OR THE   CITY AS PREFERABLE, THIS SHALL NOT BE AN OPTION AND   SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE REPORT.   B) MAHOGANY TREES #1502, 1503, 1507, 1520, 1539, AND   1540:       1) IF THE TREES ARE TO BE MOVED TO A TEMPORARY HOLDING   AREA, THE LOCATION OF THE TEMPORARY HOLDING AREA SHALL   BE ESTABLISHED AND AGREEMENTS FOR STORAGE OF THE TREES   ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY SHALL BE ESTABLISHED WITH THE   OWNER OF THE PROPERTY.   2) THE TREE RELOCATION MANAGEMENT PLAN WILL BE REVISED   TO REFLECT THIS CHOICE AND ADJUSTED TO ITEMIZE ALL   ACTIONS TO BE COMPLETED AT EACH STAGE OF CONSTRUCTION.       3) THE TREES SHALL BE MONITORED DAILY AND A WEEKLY   REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ON THEIR CONDITION UNTIL   THE FINAL LANDSCAPE INSPECTION AND MONITORED THEREAFTER   IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-448   (E)3 FOR ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF PLANTING IN THE   FINAL LOCATION.       C) SABAL PALMS (34):       1) IF THE PALMS ARE TO BE MOVED TO A TEMPORARY HOLDING   AREA, THE LOCATION OF THE TEMPORARY HOLDING AREA SHALL   BE ESTABLISHED AND AGREEMENTS FOR STORAGE OF THE TREES   ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY SHALL BE ESTABLISHED WITH THE   OWNER OF THE PROPERTY.   2) IF THE PALMS ARE TO BE TRANSPORTED TO A COMMERCIAL   NURSERY OFF SITE, THE CONTRACTOR AND NURSERY SHALL BE   IDENTIFIED.   3) THE TREE RELOCATION MANAGEMENT PLAN WILL BE REVISED   TO REFLECT THIS CHOICE AND ADJUSTED TO ITEMIZE ALL   ACTIONS TO BE COMPLETED AT EACH STAGE OF CONSTRUCTION.   4) THE PALMS SHALL BE MONITORED DAILY AND A WEEKLY   REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ON THEIR CONDITION UNTIL   THE FINAL LANDSCAPE INSPECTION AND MONITORED THEREAFTER   IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-448   (E)3 FOR ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF PLANTING IN THE   FINAL LOCATION.     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 6 Status F Date 09-24-2021 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 09-24-2021 Time 16:32 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 09-24-2021 Time 16:32 Sent To   Notes 2021-09-24 16:33:13 FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER   561-822-1462   PROJECT: FLAGLER TOWER Z21050015   SEPTEMBER 22, 2021   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:       REVIEW: FLAGLER TOWERS 7/20/21   1. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED   2. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED   3. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED   4. SATISFIED. DUE TO THE CONSTRUCTION IMPACT ON THE   EXISTING MATURE TREES ON CITY PROPERTY ALONG DIANA PL.   REMOVE FICUS TREES AND REPLACE WITH 1 TO 1 CATEGORY   SHADE TREE. (SEE #5)   7/27/21 RC: PLAN IS ALREADY IN PLACE BETWEEN PLANNING   AND PARKS AND REC. TO REPLACE FICUS WITH GREEN BUTTON   WOOD IN AGREEMENT WITH THE NORTON PARK PLACE CONDO.   APPLICANTS MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FOR TREES ON   NORTH SIDE OF DIANA PLACE.   7/20/2021   6. 7/27/21 RC. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE   TREE DISPOSITION LIST:   ? SATISFIED. SHOW THE DISPOSITION OF TREES #1479 ?   #1530.   ? SATISFIED. IDENTIFY TREE #1504   ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE FOR   TREES AND PALMS LISTED TO BE REMOVED. ON EXISTING TREES   ON SITE LIST AND EXISTING TREES ON ADJACENT SITE LIST.   7. SATISFIED. SEE COMMENT #6 TREE #1479 ON TREE LIST   WILL NEED TO BE LISTED AS REMOVE TO REFLECT DEPICTION   ON THE MAP. PAGE D-1   8. SATISFIED. APPLICANT NEEDS PROVIDE LANDSCAPE PLANS   FOR POOL TERRACE PAGE LA 3-1. THE LANDSCAPING ON THE   AMENITIES LEVEL WILL BE APPROVED WITH PROJECT AND NEEDS   TO BE SUBMITTED.   9. SATISFIED. LIVE OAK TREES ON FLAGLER APPEAR TO BE IN   CONFLICT WITH MAN HOLE COVERS AND STORM WATER LINE.   ADJUST LINE OR TREE LOCATIONS TO BE RESOLVE.   10. SATISFIED. LIVE OAK ON SOUTH SIDE BUFFER APPEARS TO   BE TOO CLOSE TO BUILDING AND ENTRY CANOPY AND WILL   OUTGROW ITS SPACE CREATING A CONFLICT WITH THE BUILDING   AND SHADE CANOPY.   THE TREES DO NOT APPEAR ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET   LG-3.1. IF THIS IS IN ERROR, PROVIDE A MANAGEMENT PLAN   FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE TREES.   11. SATISFIED. IN EAST SIDE COURTYARD THERE IS A STRAY   UNMARKED DIAGONAL LINE GOING ACROSS. IDENTIFY LINE OR   REMOVE IF IT?S NOT INTENTIONAL.   SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER WILL RETURN ON 7/22 PLAN IS   SUBJECT TO HIS REVIEW   7/27/21 RC.   13. SATISFIED. ALL LANDSCAPE PLANS NEED TO BE ON AT   LEAST 1-20 SCALE PLAN AS THE CURRENT SCALE IS NOT   READABLE   14. SATISFIED. SHOW OPEN SPACE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THE   NON-BUILDING AREA OF THE LOT. ADJUST OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM   ON SHEET LR-2. LANDSCAPING OVER BUILDING STRUCTURE IS   NOT COUNTED FOR OPEN SPACE. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM SHOWING   LANDSCAPED AREAS.   15. SATISFIED. USING THE OPEN SPACE SQUARE FOOTAGE   CALCULATE THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED SHADE TREES, FLOWERING   TREES AND SHRUBS PER SECTION 94-442 (C) (2) B. ADD THE   TOTAL TREES REQUIRED FOR OPEN SPACE AND FOR MULTIFAMILY   REQUIREMENT AND SHOW THE TOTAL REQUIRED TREES.   16. SATISFIED. SHOW THE PROVIDED LINEAR FEET OF   LANDSCAPING FOR THE BUILDING PERIMETER.   ABOVE GROUND POTS AND PLANTERS MAY NOT BE COUNTED AS   PERIMETER LANDSCAPE. THERE ARE AREAS ADJACENT TO THE   BUILDING ON THE OLIVE SIDE AND SHOWN AS PLANTINGS THAT   DO NOT APPEAR AS OPENINGS IN THE PAVED AREAS. CLEARLY   IDENTIFY THESE AREAS AND RECALCULATE THE PERIMETER   LANDSCAPE.   17. SATISFIED. ADD A NATIVE COLUMN TO THE PLANT   SCHEDULE SO STAFF CAN VERIFY REQUIREMENTS.   18. SATISFIED. MAGNOLIA MAY BE COUNTED AS NATIVE.   19. SATISFIED. FLORIDA FRIENDLY REQUIREMENTS. PROVIDE   AN AREA PLAN SHOWING THE SOD AREAS AS PART OF THE TOTAL   LANDSCAPE AREA AND PROVIDE THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE. ITEM   6B DOES NOT APPLY.   ITEM 6B STILL DOES NOT APPLY.   20. SATISFIED. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON SEA   PLUM TREE IN ORDER TO IDENTIFY IF IT IS A CULTIVAR OF   SEA GRAPE.   21. SATISFIED. TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES PROVIDED NEEDS TO   BE SHOWN FROM THE PLANT LIST. CURRENT COUNT IS 92 TREES   PLUS 11 CABBAGE PALMS AT 3:1 FOR A TOTAL OF 95. SHOW   RELOCATED TREES ON THE PLANT LIST. SHOW OFFSITE TREES   ON THE PLANT LIST. IF REQUIRED TREES ARE NOT TO BE   PROVIDED ON SITE A WAVER MUST BE REQUESTED.   22. SATISFIED. THE TREES PROVIDED ON THE AMENITY AREA   ON FLAGLER NEED TO BE SPREAD OUT TO PROVIDE SHADE FOR   PEDESTRIANS.   THE INTENT FOR THE OVERALL PEDESTRIAN PLAN FOR THE CITY   IS TO PROVIDE TREE CANOPY SHADE OVER PUBLIC AREAS AND   PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALKS. THE LARGE GAP ADJACENT TO THE   PLAZA DOES NOT MEET THIS INTENT. STAFF DOES NOT   RECOGNIZE HAVING THE TREES IN FRONT OF THE PLAZA AS A   SAFETY ISSUE, AS THE TREES WOULD MEET CPTED (CRIME   PREVENTION THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN)   RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE TREE BRANCHING TO BE ABOVE 7   FEET. PEDESTRIAN ENJOYMENT OF THE PUBLIC WALKWAY ALSO   OUTWEIGHS THE NEEDS OF THE PROPERTY OWNER TO EXPOSE THE   ARCHITECTURE OF THE BUILDING.   23. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. TRANSPLANTED OAK TREE #1538   APPEARS TO BE PROBLEMATIC IN THE SPECIFIED LOCATION   THAT IT WILL CONFLICT WITH THE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION.   TRANSPLANTED TREES MAY BE RELOCATED OFF SITE. THIS   APPEARS THIS COULD ALSO BE AN ISSUE WITH THE OTHER   RELOCATED TREES AND PALMS.   THE APPLICANT HAS A NOTE PLACED ON THE PLANS FOR   TEMPORARY STORAGE OF THE RELOCATED TREES. PROVIDE A   MORE DETAILED PLAN ON HOW THIS WILL BE IMPLEMENTED. THE   RELOCATED LIVE OAK IS SHOWN WITH PAVING PROPOSED OVER   THE ROOT SYSTEM AT ITS NEW LOCATION THAT WILL NOT BE   PRACTICAL OR HEALTHY FOR THE TREE. THE RENDERINGS SHOW   GRASS AREA. A SUSPENDED PAVING SYSTEM OR SOIL CELLS   MUST BE PROVIDED IF THE TREE IS TO BE SUSTAINABLE.   PROVIDE THE RELOCATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE   TREES BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER RELOCATION AND INCLUDE   IT ON THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN.   THE APPLICANT HAS PROVIDED INFORMATION IN THE COMMENT   RESPONSES, BUT THAT INFORMATION NEEDS TO BE IN A   MANAGEMENT PLAN SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/18/21:   24. SATISFIED. TREE COUNT ON THE PLANT LIST OF 29 LIVE   OAK TREES DOES NOT MATCH THE PLAN SHOWING 30 TREES.   25. SATISFIED. THE SIDEWALK PROPOSED ALONG OLIVE AVE.   APPEARS TO BE TOO CLOSE TO EXISTING TREES AND PALMS.   PROVIDE MORE DETAIL ON HOW THIS WILL BE ADDRESSED.   SITE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH ADJUSTED SIDEWALK ON THE   LANDSCAPE PLAN.   26. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND   MOUNTED EQUIPMENT INCLUDING WATER AND FIRE BACKFLOWS ON   THE CURRIE CRESCENT SIDE OF THE BUILDING.   27. SATISFIED. VINES ARE SHOWN ON THE RENDERINGS ON THE   WALL OF THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING, BUT NO PLANTS   ARE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. CORRECT TO SHOW THE   PLANTINGS.   28. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL MITIGATION   DUE FOR THE ON SITE TREES AND PALMS TO BE REMOVED.   ADONIDIA PALMS ARE CATEGORY 4 AND REQUIRE 50 SQ FT   CANOPY MITIGATION PER TRUNK, SPANISH CHERRY IS LISTED   UNDER CATEGORY 1 AND REQUIRES 300 SQ FT CANOPY   MITIGATION. PROVIDE THE LIST OF TREES ADDED TO THE SITE   AND ASSIGN THE CANOPY CREDITS BASED ON THE CATEGORY AND   PROVIDE THE TOTAL.   THERE ARE CORRECTIONS REQUIRED FOR THE ONSITE AND   OFFSITE MITIGATION CALCULATIONS.   CALCULATIONS FOR THE MITIGATION PROVIDED ON SITE BASED   ON THE PLANT LIST SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM SHEET L-3.4   AND PLACED IN A CHART ON SHEET D-2. SABAL PALMS ARE   CATEGORY 3 AND ARE 100 SQ FT CREDIT. TOTAL EXCESS OF   TREE CANOPY NEEDS TO BE SHOWN.   29. THE PLANTING PLANS FOR THE OFF SITE TREES NEED TO   BE REVISED TO SHOW THE FOLLOWING:   ? SATISFIED. THE ROYAL PALMS BETWEEN THE GREEN   BUTTONWOOD TREES ARE NOT APPROPRIATE TO DUPLICATE THE   CURRENT LOOK OF THE TREE CANOPY AND THEY WOULD PRESENT   A SAFETY AND MAINTENANCE ISSUE OVER THE PAVEMENT AND   PARKING SPACES. REMOVE THE ROW OF PALMS ADJACENT TO THE   CURB.   THERE IS A GAP IN THE TREE CANOPY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF   ACTION PL. ADJACENT TO THE ANGLED PARKING SPACES. GREEN   BUTTONWOOD TREES MUST BE PLACED ALONG THIS AREA   REPLACING THE ROYAL PALMS.       ? SATISFIED. THERE IS NOT ENOUGH ROOM PROVIDED FOR THE   ROOT ZONE OF THE TREES. THE SIDEWALK NEEDS TO BE PUSHED   FARTHER AWAY FROM THE CURB (10 TO 12 FEET) ALLOWING   ENOUGH ROOT SPACE FOR THE TREES AND THE NARROWER   LANDSCAPE AREA ON THE BACK OF SIDEWALK. ROYAL PALMS   COULD BE PLACED IN THIS STRIP, BUT THEY WOULD HAVE TO   BE FAR ENOUGH AWAY FROM THE SIDEWALK TO AVOID FRONDS   DROPPING ON THE SIDEWALK.   ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL TREE CANOPY   MITIGATION DUE FOR THE REMOVED TREES AND PROVIDE THE   MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED FOR THE NEW TREES   AND PALMS PROPOSED. IF THERE IS MITIGATION DUE, STAFF   WILL DISCUSS OPTIONS TO ADDRESS IT.   THERE ARE CORRECTIONS REQUIRED FOR THE ONSITE AND   OFFSITE MITIGATION CALCULATIONS.       SHOW THE TOTAL MITIGATION DUE AFTER CREDITS ON SHEET   D-2.       ? SATISFIED. INCREASING THE NUMBER OF GREEN BUTTONWOOD   TREES AND ROYAL PALMS WOULD INCREASE THE PUBLIC   BENEFITS AND THE AESTHETICS.   ? SATISFIED. EXPLAIN WHY THERE IS A GAP ON THE CORNER   OF OLIVE AND DIANA WITH NO TREE CANOPY PROVIDED. THIS   WAS A LOCATION SUGGESTED BY STAFF FOR THE RELOCATED   LIVE OAK TREE.           CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.       2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR   THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE STREET TREES AND   RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH   THIS PETITION.       3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR   THE MAINTENANCE OF THE, ROAD RIGHT OF WAY   LANDSCAPING/TREES AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH   A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 5 Status F Date 09-01-2021 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 09-01-2021 Time 16:49 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 09-01-2021 Time 16:49 Sent To   Notes 2021-09-01 16:49:51 FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER   561-822-1462   PROJECT: FLAGLER TOWER Z21050015   AUGUST 31, 2021   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:       REVIEW: FLAGLER TOWERS 7/20/21   1. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED   2. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED   3. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED   4. SATISFIED. DUE TO THE CONSTRUCTION IMPACT ON THE   EXISTING MATURE TREES ON CITY PROPERTY ALONG DIANA PL.   REMOVE FICUS TREES AND REPLACE WITH 1 TO 1 CATEGORY   SHADE TREE. (SEE #5)   7/27/21 RC: PLAN IS ALREADY IN PLACE BETWEEN PLANNING   AND PARKS AND REC. TO REPLACE FICUS WITH GREEN BUTTON   WOOD IN AGREEMENT WITH THE NORTON PARK PLACE CONDO.   APPLICANTS MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FOR TREES ON   NORTH SIDE OF DIANA PLACE.   7/20/2021   6. 7/27/21 RC. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE   TREE DISPOSITION LIST:   ? SATISFIED. SHOW THE DISPOSITION OF TREES #1479 ?   #1530.   ? SATISFIED. IDENTIFY TREE #1504   ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE FOR   TREES AND PALMS LISTED TO BE REMOVED. ON EXISTING TREES   ON SITE LIST AND EXISTING TREES ON ADJACENT SITE LIST.   7. SATISFIED. SEE COMMENT #6 TREE #1479 ON TREE LIST   WILL NEED TO BE LISTED AS REMOVE TO REFLECT DEPICTION   ON THE MAP. PAGE D-1   8. SATISFIED. APPLICANT NEEDS PROVIDE LANDSCAPE PLANS   FOR POOL TERRACE PAGE LA 3-1. THE LANDSCAPING ON THE   AMENITIES LEVEL WILL BE APPROVED WITH PROJECT AND NEEDS   TO BE SUBMITTED.   9. SATISFIED. LIVE OAK TREES ON FLAGLER APPEAR TO BE IN   CONFLICT WITH MAN HOLE COVERS AND STORM WATER LINE.   ADJUST LINE OR TREE LOCATIONS TO BE RESOLVE.   10. SATISFIED. LIVE OAK ON SOUTH SIDE BUFFER APPEARS TO   BE TOO CLOSE TO BUILDING AND ENTRY CANOPY AND WILL   OUTGROW ITS SPACE CREATING A CONFLICT WITH THE BUILDING   AND SHADE CANOPY.   THE TREES DO NOT APPEAR ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET   LG-3.1. IF THIS IS IN ERROR, PROVIDE A MANAGEMENT PLAN   FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE TREES.   11. SATISFIED. IN EAST SIDE COURTYARD THERE IS A STRAY   UNMARKED DIAGONAL LINE GOING ACROSS. IDENTIFY LINE OR   REMOVE IF IT?S NOT INTENTIONAL.   SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER WILL RETURN ON 7/22 PLAN IS   SUBJECT TO HIS REVIEW   7/27/21 RC.   13. SATISFIED. ALL LANDSCAPE PLANS NEED TO BE ON AT   LEAST 1-20 SCALE PLAN AS THE CURRENT SCALE IS NOT   READABLE   14. SATISFIED. SHOW OPEN SPACE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THE   NON-BUILDING AREA OF THE LOT. ADJUST OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM   ON SHEET LR-2. LANDSCAPING OVER BUILDING STRUCTURE IS   NOT COUNTED FOR OPEN SPACE. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM SHOWING   LANDSCAPED AREAS.   15. SATISFIED. USING THE OPEN SPACE SQUARE FOOTAGE   CALCULATE THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED SHADE TREES, FLOWERING   TREES AND SHRUBS PER SECTION 94-442 (C) (2) B. ADD THE   TOTAL TREES REQUIRED FOR OPEN SPACE AND FOR MULTIFAMILY   REQUIREMENT AND SHOW THE TOTAL REQUIRED TREES.   16. SATISFIED. SHOW THE PROVIDED LINEAR FEET OF   LANDSCAPING FOR THE BUILDING PERIMETER.   ABOVE GROUND POTS AND PLANTERS MAY NOT BE COUNTED AS   PERIMETER LANDSCAPE. THERE ARE AREAS ADJACENT TO THE   BUILDING ON THE OLIVE SIDE AND SHOWN AS PLANTINGS THAT   DO NOT APPEAR AS OPENINGS IN THE PAVED AREAS. CLEARLY   IDENTIFY THESE AREAS AND RECALCULATE THE PERIMETER   LANDSCAPE.   17. SATISFIED. ADD A NATIVE COLUMN TO THE PLANT   SCHEDULE SO STAFF CAN VERIFY REQUIREMENTS.   18. SATISFIED. MAGNOLIA MAY BE COUNTED AS NATIVE.   19. SATISFIED. FLORIDA FRIENDLY REQUIREMENTS. PROVIDE   AN AREA PLAN SHOWING THE SOD AREAS AS PART OF THE TOTAL   LANDSCAPE AREA AND PROVIDE THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE. ITEM   6B DOES NOT APPLY.   ITEM 6B STILL DOES NOT APPLY.   20. SATISFIED. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON SEA   PLUM TREE IN ORDER TO IDENTIFY IF IT IS A CULTIVAR OF   SEA GRAPE.   21. SATISFIED. TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES PROVIDED NEEDS TO   BE SHOWN FROM THE PLANT LIST. CURRENT COUNT IS 92 TREES   PLUS 11 CABBAGE PALMS AT 3:1 FOR A TOTAL OF 95. SHOW   RELOCATED TREES ON THE PLANT LIST. SHOW OFFSITE TREES   ON THE PLANT LIST. IF REQUIRED TREES ARE NOT TO BE   PROVIDED ON SITE A WAVER MUST BE REQUESTED.   22. SATISFIED. THE TREES PROVIDED ON THE AMENITY AREA   ON FLAGLER NEED TO BE SPREAD OUT TO PROVIDE SHADE FOR   PEDESTRIANS.   THE INTENT FOR THE OVERALL PEDESTRIAN PLAN FOR THE CITY   IS TO PROVIDE TREE CANOPY SHADE OVER PUBLIC AREAS AND   PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALKS. THE LARGE GAP ADJACENT TO THE   PLAZA DOES NOT MEET THIS INTENT. STAFF DOES NOT   RECOGNIZE HAVING THE TREES IN FRONT OF THE PLAZA AS A   SAFETY ISSUE, AS THE TREES WOULD MEET CPTED (CRIME   PREVENTION THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN)   RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE TREE BRANCHING TO BE ABOVE 7   FEET. PEDESTRIAN ENJOYMENT OF THE PUBLIC WALKWAY ALSO   OUTWEIGHS THE NEEDS OF THE PROPERTY OWNER TO EXPOSE THE   ARCHITECTURE OF THE BUILDING.   23. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. TRANSPLANTED OAK TREE #1538   APPEARS TO BE PROBLEMATIC IN THE SPECIFIED LOCATION   THAT IT WILL CONFLICT WITH THE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION.   TRANSPLANTED TREES MAY BE RELOCATED OFF SITE. THIS   APPEARS THIS COULD ALSO BE AN ISSUE WITH THE OTHER   RELOCATED TREES AND PALMS.   THE APPLICANT HAS A NOTE PLACED ON THE PLANS FOR   TEMPORARY STORAGE OF THE RELOCATED TREES. PROVIDE A   MORE DETAILED PLAN ON HOW THIS WILL BE IMPLEMENTED. THE   RELOCATED LIVE OAK IS SHOWN WITH PAVING PROPOSED OVER   THE ROOT SYSTEM AT ITS NEW LOCATION THAT WILL NOT BE   PRACTICAL OR HEALTHY FOR THE TREE. THE RENDERINGS SHOW   GRASS AREA. A SUSPENDED PAVING SYSTEM OR SOIL CELLS   MUST BE PROVIDED IF THE TREE IS TO BE SUSTAINABLE.   PROVIDE THE RELOCATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE   TREES BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER RELOCATION AND INCLUDE   IT ON THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/18/21:   24. SATISFIED. TREE COUNT ON THE PLANT LIST OF 29 LIVE   OAK TREES DOES NOT MATCH THE PLAN SHOWING 30 TREES.   25. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE SIDEWALK PROPOSED ALONG   OLIVE AVE. APPEARS TO BE TOO CLOSE TO EXISTING TREES   AND PALMS. PROVIDE MORE DETAIL ON HOW THIS WILL BE   ADDRESSED.   SITE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH ADJUSTED SIDEWALK ON THE   LANDSCAPE PLAN.   26. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND   MOUNTED EQUIPMENT INCLUDING WATER AND FIRE BACKFLOWS ON   THE CURRIE CRESCENT SIDE OF THE BUILDING.   27. SATISFIED. VINES ARE SHOWN ON THE RENDERINGS ON THE   WALL OF THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING, BUT NO PLANTS   ARE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. CORRECT TO SHOW THE   PLANTINGS.   28. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL MITIGATION   DUE FOR THE ON SITE TREES AND PALMS TO BE REMOVED.   ADONIDIA PALMS ARE CATEGORY 4 AND REQUIRE 50 SQ FT   CANOPY MITIGATION PER TRUNK, SPANISH CHERRY IS LISTED   UNDER CATEGORY 1 AND REQUIRES 300 SQ FT CANOPY   MITIGATION. PROVIDE THE LIST OF TREES ADDED TO THE SITE   AND ASSIGN THE CANOPY CREDITS BASED ON THE CATEGORY AND   PROVIDE THE TOTAL.   THERE ARE CORRECTIONS REQUIRED FOR THE ONSITE AND   OFFSITE MITIGATION CALCULATIONS.   29. THE PLANTING PLANS FOR THE OFF SITE TREES NEED TO   BE REVISED TO SHOW THE FOLLOWING:   ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE ROYAL PALMS BETWEEN THE   GREEN BUTTONWOOD TREES ARE NOT APPROPRIATE TO DUPLICATE   THE CURRENT LOOK OF THE TREE CANOPY AND THEY WOULD   PRESENT A SAFETY AND MAINTENANCE ISSUE OVER THE   PAVEMENT AND PARKING SPACES. REMOVE THE ROW OF PALMS   ADJACENT TO THE CURB.   THERE IS A GAP IN THE TREE CANOPY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF   ACTION PL. ADJACENT TO THE ANGLED PARKING SPACES. GREEN   BUTTONWOOD TREES MUST BE PLACED ALONG THIS AREA   REPLACING THE ROYAL PALMS.       ? SATISFIED. THERE IS NOT ENOUGH ROOM PROVIDED FOR THE   ROOT ZONE OF THE TREES. THE SIDEWALK NEEDS TO BE PUSHED   FARTHER AWAY FROM THE CURB (10 TO 12 FEET) ALLOWING   ENOUGH ROOT SPACE FOR THE TREES AND THE NARROWER   LANDSCAPE AREA ON THE BACK OF SIDEWALK. ROYAL PALMS   COULD BE PLACED IN THIS STRIP, BUT THEY WOULD HAVE TO   BE FAR ENOUGH AWAY FROM THE SIDEWALK TO AVOID FRONDS   DROPPING ON THE SIDEWALK.   ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL TREE CANOPY   MITIGATION DUE FOR THE REMOVED TREES AND PROVIDE THE   MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED FOR THE NEW TREES   AND PALMS PROPOSED. IF THERE IS MITIGATION DUE, STAFF   WILL DISCUSS OPTIONS TO ADDRESS IT.   THERE ARE CORRECTIONS REQUIRED FOR THE ONSITE AND   OFFSITE MITIGATION CALCULATIONS.       ? SATISFIED. INCREASING THE NUMBER OF GREEN BUTTONWOOD   TREES AND ROYAL PALMS WOULD INCREASE THE PUBLIC   BENEFITS AND THE AESTHETICS.   ? SATISFIED. EXPLAIN WHY THERE IS A GAP ON THE CORNER   OF OLIVE AND DIANA WITH NO TREE CANOPY PROVIDED. THIS   WAS A LOCATION SUGGESTED BY STAFF FOR THE RELOCATED   LIVE OAK TREE.           CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.       2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR   THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE STREET TREES AND   RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH   THIS PETITION.       3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR   THE MAINTENANCE OF THE, ROAD RIGHT OF WAY   LANDSCAPING/TREES AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH   A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 4 Status F Date 08-19-2021 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 08-19-2021 Time 10:17 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 08-19-2021 Time 10:17 Sent To   Notes 2021-08-19 10:17:40 FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER   561-822-1462   PROJECT: FLAGLER TOWER Z21050015   AUGUST 18, 2021   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:       REVIEW: FLAGLER TOWERS 7/20/21   1. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED   2. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED   3. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED   4. SATISFIED. DUE TO THE CONSTRUCTION IMPACT ON THE   EXISTING MATURE TREES ON CITY PROPERTY ALONG DIANA PL.   REMOVE FICUS TREES AND REPLACE WITH 1 TO 1 CATEGORY   SHADE TREE. (SEE #5)   7/27/21 RC: PLAN IS ALREADY IN PLACE BETWEEN PLANNING   AND PARKS AND REC. TO REPLACE FICUS WITH GREEN BUTTON   WOOD IN AGREEMENT WITH THE NORTON PARK PLACE CONDO.   APPLICANTS MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FOR TREES ON   NORTH SIDE OF DIANA PLACE.   7/20/2021   6. 7/27/21 RC. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE   TREE DISPOSITION LIST:   ? SATISFIED. SHOW THE DISPOSITION OF TREES #1479 ?   #1530.   ? SATISFIED. IDENTIFY TREE #1504   ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE FOR   TREES AND PALMS LISTED TO BE REMOVED. ON EXISTING TREES   ON SITE LIST AND EXISTING TREES ON ADJACENT SITE LIST.   7. SATISFIED. SEE COMMENT #6 TREE #1479 ON TREE LIST   WILL NEED TO BE LISTED AS REMOVE TO REFLECT DEPICTION   ON THE MAP. PAGE D-1   8. SATISFIED. APPLICANT NEEDS PROVIDE LANDSCAPE PLANS   FOR POOL TERRACE PAGE LA 3-1. THE LANDSCAPING ON THE   AMENITIES LEVEL WILL BE APPROVED WITH PROJECT AND NEEDS   TO BE SUBMITTED.   9. SATISFIED. LIVE OAK TREES ON FLAGLER APPEAR TO BE IN   CONFLICT WITH MAN HOLE COVERS AND STORM WATER LINE.   ADJUST LINE OR TREE LOCATIONS TO BE RESOLVE.   10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. LIVE OAK ON SOUTH SIDE BUFFER   APPEARS TO BE TOO CLOSE TO BUILDING AND ENTRY CANOPY   AND WILL OUTGROW ITS SPACE CREATING A CONFLICT WITH THE   BUILDING AND SHADE CANOPY.   THE TREES DO NOT APPEAR ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET   LG-3.1. IF THIS IS IN ERROR, PROVIDE A MANAGEMENT PLAN   FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE TREES.   11. SATISFIED. IN EAST SIDE COURTYARD THERE IS A STRAY   UNMARKED DIAGONAL LINE GOING ACROSS. IDENTIFY LINE OR   REMOVE IF IT?S NOT INTENTIONAL.   SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER WILL RETURN ON 7/22 PLAN IS   SUBJECT TO HIS REVIEW   7/27/21 RC.   13. SATISFIED. ALL LANDSCAPE PLANS NEED TO BE ON AT   LEAST 1-20 SCALE PLAN AS THE CURRENT SCALE IS NOT   READABLE   14. SATISFIED. SHOW OPEN SPACE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THE   NON-BUILDING AREA OF THE LOT. ADJUST OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM   ON SHEET LR-2. LANDSCAPING OVER BUILDING STRUCTURE IS   NOT COUNTED FOR OPEN SPACE. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM SHOWING   LANDSCAPED AREAS.   15. SATISFIED. USING THE OPEN SPACE SQUARE FOOTAGE   CALCULATE THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED SHADE TREES, FLOWERING   TREES AND SHRUBS PER SECTION 94-442 (C) (2) B. ADD THE   TOTAL TREES REQUIRED FOR OPEN SPACE AND FOR MULTIFAMILY   REQUIREMENT AND SHOW THE TOTAL REQUIRED TREES.   16. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW THE PROVIDED LINEAR FEET   OF LANDSCAPING FOR THE BUILDING PERIMETER.   ABOVE GROUND POTS AND PLANTERS MAY NOT BE COUNTED AS   PERIMETER LANDSCAPE. THERE ARE AREAS ADJACENT TO THE   BUILDING ON THE OLIVE SIDE AND SHOWN AS PLANTINGS THAT   DO NOT APPEAR AS OPENINGS IN THE PAVED AREAS. CLEARLY   IDENTIFY THESE AREAS AND RECALCULATE THE PERIMETER   LANDSCAPE.   17. SATISFIED. ADD A NATIVE COLUMN TO THE PLANT   SCHEDULE SO STAFF CAN VERIFY REQUIREMENTS.   18. SATISFIED. MAGNOLIA MAY BE COUNTED AS NATIVE.   19. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. FLORIDA FRIENDLY REQUIREMENTS.   PROVIDE AN AREA PLAN SHOWING THE SOD AREAS AS PART OF   THE TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA AND PROVIDE THE TOTAL   PERCENTAGE. ITEM 6B DOES NOT APPLY.   ITEM 6B STILL DOES NOT APPLY.   20. SATISFIED. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON SEA   PLUM TREE IN ORDER TO IDENTIFY IF IT IS A CULTIVAR OF   SEA GRAPE.   21. SATISFIED. TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES PROVIDED NEEDS TO   BE SHOWN FROM THE PLANT LIST. CURRENT COUNT IS 92 TREES   PLUS 11 CABBAGE PALMS AT 3:1 FOR A TOTAL OF 95. SHOW   RELOCATED TREES ON THE PLANT LIST. SHOW OFFSITE TREES   ON THE PLANT LIST. IF REQUIRED TREES ARE NOT TO BE   PROVIDED ON SITE A WAVER MUST BE REQUESTED.   22. NOT SATISFIED. THE TREES PROVIDED ON THE AMENITY   AREA ON FLAGLER NEED TO BE SPREAD OUT TO PROVIDE SHADE   FOR PEDESTRIANS.   THE INTENT FOR THE OVERALL PEDESTRIAN PLAN FOR THE CITY   IS TO PROVIDE TREE CANOPY SHADE OVER PUBLIC AREAS AND   PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALKS. THE LARGE GAP ADJACENT TO THE   PLAZA DOES NOT MEET THIS INTENT. STAFF DOES NOT   RECOGNIZE HAVING THE TREES IN FRONT OF THE PLAZA AS A   SAFETY ISSUE, AS THE TREES WOULD MEET CPTED (CRIME   PREVENTION THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN)   RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE TREE BRANCHING TO BE ABOVE 7   FEET. PEDESTRIAN ENJOYMENT OF THE PUBLIC WALKWAY ALSO   OUTWEIGHS THE NEEDS OF THE PROPERTY OWNER TO EXPOSE THE   ARCHITECTURE OF THE BUILDING.   23. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. TRANSPLANTED OAK TREE #1538   APPEARS TO BE PROBLEMATIC IN THE SPECIFIED LOCATION   THAT IT WILL CONFLICT WITH THE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION.   TRANSPLANTED TREES MAY BE RELOCATED OFF SITE. THIS   APPEARS THIS COULD ALSO BE AN ISSUE WITH THE OTHER   RELOCATED TREES AND PALMS.   THE APPLICANT HAS A NOTE PLACED ON THE PLANS FOR   TEMPORARY STORAGE OF THE RELOCATED TREES. PROVIDE A   MORE DETAILED PLAN ON HOW THIS WILL BE IMPLEMENTED. THE   RELOCATED LIVE OAK IS SHOWN WITH PAVING PROPOSED OVER   THE ROOT SYSTEM AT ITS NEW LOCATION THAT WILL NOT BE   PRACTICAL OR HEALTHY FOR THE TREE. THE RENDERINGS SHOW   GRASS AREA. A SUSPENDED PAVING SYSTEM OR SOIL CELLS   MUST BE PROVIDED IF THE TREE IS TO BE SUSTAINABLE.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/18/21:   24. TREE COUNT ON THE PLANT LIST OF 29 LIVE OAK TREES   DOES NOT MATCH THE PLAN SHOWING 30 TREES.   25. THE SIDEWALK PROPOSED ALONG OLIVE AVE. APPEARS TO   BE TOO CLOSE TO EXISTING TREES AND PALMS. PROVIDE MORE   DETAIL ON HOW THIS WILL BE ADDRESSED.   26. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED   EQUIPMENT INCLUDING WATER AND FIRE BACKFLOWS ON THE   CURRIE CRESCENT SIDE OF THE BUILDING.   27. VINES ARE SHOWN ON THE RENDERINGS ON THE WALL OF   THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING, BUT NO PLANTS ARE SHOWN   ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. CORRECT TO SHOW THE PLANTINGS.   28. PROVIDE THE TOTAL MITIGATION DUE FOR THE ON SITE   TREES AND PALMS TO BE REMOVED. ADONIDIA PALMS ARE   CATEGORY 4 AND REQUIRE 50 SQ FT CANOPY MITIGATION PER   TRUNK, SPANISH CHERRY IS LISTED UNDER CATEGORY 1 AND   REQUIRES 300 SQ FT CANOPY MITIGATION. PROVIDE THE LIST   OF TREES ADDED TO THE SITE AND ASSIGN THE CANOPY   CREDITS BASED ON THE CATEGORY AND PROVIDE THE TOTAL.   29. THE PLANTING PLANS FOR THE OFF SITE TREES NEED TO   BE REVISED TO SHOW THE FOLLOWING:   ? THE ROYAL PALMS BETWEEN THE GREEN BUTTONWOOD TREES   ARE NOT APPROPRIATE TO DUPLICATE THE CURRENT LOOK OF   THE TREE CANOPY AND THEY WOULD PRESENT A SAFETY AND   MAINTENANCE ISSUE OVER THE PAVEMENT AND PARKING SPACES.   REMOVE THE ROW OF PALMS ADJACENT TO THE CURB.   ? THERE IS NOT ENOUGH ROOM PROVIDED FOR THE ROOT ZONE   OF THE TREES. THE SIDEWALK NEEDS TO BE PUSHED FARTHER   AWAY FROM THE CURB (10 TO 12 FEET) ALLOWING ENOUGH ROOT   SPACE FOR THE TREES AND THE NARROWER LANDSCAPE AREA ON   THE BACK OF SIDEWALK. ROYAL PALMS COULD BE PLACED IN   THIS STRIP, BUT THEY WOULD HAVE TO BE FAR ENOUGH AWAY   FROM THE SIDEWALK TO AVOID FRONDS DROPPING ON THE   SIDEWALK.   ? PROVIDE THE TOTAL TREE CANOPY MITIGATION DUE FOR THE   REMOVED TREES AND PROVIDE THE MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE   PROVIDED FOR THE NEW TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED. IF THERE   IS MITIGATION DUE, STAFF WILL DISCUSS OPTIONS TO   ADDRESS IT.   ? INCREASING THE NUMBER OF GREEN BUTTONWOOD TREES AND   ROYAL PALMS WOULD INCREASE THE PUBLIC BENEFITS AND THE   AESTHETICS.   ? EXPLAIN WHY THERE IS A GAP ON THE CORNER OF OLIVE AND   DIANA WITH NO TREE CANOPY PROVIDED. THIS WAS A LOCATION   SUGGESTED BY STAFF FOR THE RELOCATED LIVE OAK TREE.           CONDITION OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.       2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR   THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE STREET TREES AND   RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH   THIS PETITION.       3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR   THE MAINTENANCE OF THE, ROAD RIGHT OF WAY   LANDSCAPING/TREES AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH   A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 3 Status F Date 07-27-2021 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 07-27-2021 Time 11:37 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 07-27-2021 Time 11:37 Sent To   Notes 2021-07-27 11:41:16 MEMO TO FILE   FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER   561-822-1462   PROJECT: FLAGLER TOWER Z21050015   JULY 27, 2021   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:       REVIEW: FLAGLER TOWERS 7/20/21   1. SATISFIED THE PLEACHING OR SHAPING OF TREES IS   PROHIBITED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AND IS   CONSIDERED TREE ABUSE. STANDARDS FOR TRIMMING SHALL BE   PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST PRUNING   STANDARDS FOR SHADE TREES RECOMMENDED BY THE NATIONAL   ARBORIST ASSOCIATION. 94-446 B 1-5       2. SATISFIED MULTIPLE TREES ALONG CURRIE CRESCENT ARE   SHOWN TO BE PLANTED ON THE WATER AND STORMWATER LINES.   ADJUST PLANTINGS IN CONFLICT WITH UTILITIES.       3. SATISFIED PROVIDE THE CALCULATION FOR THE   INTERRUPTIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ON THE PROPERTY   LINES. UPDATE/ADJUST TREE COUNT CALCULATIONS BUFFER   1/30 FEET.       A. FLAGLER ? 9? UNABLE TO TELL TREE COUNT.   B. SOUTH DIANA PL ? UPDATE TO REFLECT THAT 19 TREES ARE   REQUIRED (NEED TO ROUND UP FOR ANY FRACTION OF A TREE).   INCLUDING THE PALMS ON THE CORNER THE SOUTH SIDE BUFFER   REQUIREMENT APPEARS TO BE MET .   C. OLIVE ? 7? THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER TREES ARE TO BE   INSTALLED ON- SITE, THEY CAN?T BE PLANTING ON THE RIGHT   - OF ? WAY AND COUNT TOWARD MEETING CODE.   D. CURRIE CRESCENT- 9? UNABLE TO TELL. AT LEAST ONE   SHADE TREE SHALL BE PLANTED EVERY LINEAR FEET OR   PORTION THEREOF. RELOCATED PALMS CANNOT ALL BE PLANTED   IN THE SAME AREA DUE TO CODE SHADE TREE REQUIREMENTS.   SEC. 94-443 A. ? F.   E. NORTH PROPERTY LINE ? APPEARS TO HAVE 12 SEA GRAPE.   REQUIREMENT MET.               4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED DUE TO THE CONSTRUCTION IMPACT   ON THE EXISTING MATURE TREES ON CITY PROPERTY ALONG   DIANA PL. REMOVE FICUS TREES AND REPLACE WITH 1 TO 1   CATEGORY SHADE TREE. (SEE #5)   7/27/21 RC: PLAN IS ALREADY IN PLACE BETWEEN PLANNING   AND PARKS AND REC. TO REPLACE FICUS WITH GREEN BUTTON   WOOD IN AGREEMENT WITH THE NORTON PARK PLACE CONDO.   APPLICANTS MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FOR TREES ON   NORTH SIDE OF DIANA PLACE.           7/20/2021   6. 7/27/21 RC. MAKE THE FALLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE   TREE DISPOSITION LIST:   ? SHOW THE DISPOSITION OF TREES #1479 ? #1530.   ? IDENTIFY TREE #1504   ? PROVIDE MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE FOR TREES AND   PALMS LISTED TO BE REMOVED. ON EXISTING TREES ON SITE   LIST AND EXISTING TREES ON ADJACENT SITE LIST .           7. SEE COMMENT #6 TREE #1479 ON TREE LIST WILL NEED TO   BE LISTED AS REMOVE TO REFLECT DEPICTION ON THE MAP.   PAGE D-1       8. APPLICANT NEEDS PROVIDE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR POOL   TERRACE PAGE LA 3-1. THE LANDSCAPING ON THE AMENITIES   LEVEL WILL BE APPROVED WITH PROJECT AND NEEDS TO BE   SUBMITTED.       9. LIVE OAK TREES ON FLAGLER APPEAR TO BE IN CONFLICT   WITH MAN HOLE COVERS AND STORM WATER LINE. ADJUST LINE   OR TREE LOCATIONS TO BE RESOLVE.       10. LIVE OAK ON SOUTH SIDE BUFFER APPEARS TO BE TO   CLOSE TO BUILDING AND ENTRY CANOPY AND WILL OUTGROW ITS   SPACE CREATING A CONFLICT WITH THE BUILDING AND SHADE   CANOPY.       11. IN EAST SIDE COURTYARD THERE IS A STRAY UNMARKED   DIAGONAL LINE GOING ACROSS. IDENTIFY LINE OR REMOVE IF   IT?S NOT INTENTIONAL.       SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER WILL RETURN ON 7/22 PLAN IS   SUBJECT TO HIS REVIEW   7/27/21 RC.   13. ALL LANDSCAPE PLANS NEED TO BE ON AT LEAST 1-20   SCALE PLAN AS THE CURRENT SCALE IS NOT READABLE   14. SHOW OPEN SPACE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THE NON-BUILDING   AREA OF THE LOT. ADJUST OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM ON SHEET   LR-2. LANDSCAPING OVER BUILDING STRUCTURE IS NOT   COUNTED FOR OPEN SPACE. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM SHOWING   LANDSCAPED AREAS.   15. USING THE OPEN SPACE SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATE THE   NUMBER OF REQUIRED SHADE TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND   SHRUBS PER SECTION 94-442 (C) (2) B. ADD THE TOTAL   TREES REQUIRED FOR OPEN SPACE AND FOR MULTIFAMILY   REQUIREMENT AND SHOW THE TOTAL REQUIRED TREES.   16. SHOW THE PROVIDED LINIER FEET OF LANDSCAPING FOR   THE BUILDING PERIMETER.   17. ADD A NATIVE COLUMN TO THE PLANT SCHEDULE SO STAFF   CAN VERIFY REQUIREMENTS.   18. MAGNOLIA MAY BE COUNTED AS NATIVE.   19. FLORIDA FRIENDLY REQUIREMENTS. PROVIDE AN AREA PLAN   SHOWING THE SOD AREAS AS PART OF THE TOTAL LANDSCAPE   AREA AND PROVIDE THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE. ITEM 6B DOES NOT   APPLY.   20. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON SEA PLUM TREE IN   ORDER TO IDENTIFY IF IT IS A CULTIVAR OF SEA GRAPE.   21. TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES PROVIDED NEEDS TO BE SHOWN   FROM THE PLANT LIST. CURRENT COUNT IS 92 TREES PLUS 11   CABBAGE PALMS AT 3:1 FOR A TOTAL OF 95. SHOW RELOCATED   TREES ON THE PLANT LIST. SHOW OFFSITE TREES ON THE   PLANT LIST. IF REQUIRED TREES ARE NOT TO BE PROVIDED ON   SITE A WAVER MUST BE REQUESTED.   22. THE TREES PROVIDED ON THE AMENITY AREA ON FLAGLER   NEED TO BE SPREAD OUT TO PROVIDE SHADE FOR PEDESTRIANS.   23. TRANSPLANTED OAK TREE #1538 APPEARS TO BE   PROBLEMATIC IN THE SPECIFIED LOCATION THAT IT WILL   CONFLICT WITH THE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. TRANSPLANTED   TREES MAYBE RELOCATED OFF SITE. THIS APPEARS THIS COULD   ALSO BE AN ISSUE WITH THE OTHER RELOCATED TREES AND   PALMS.       CONDITION OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.       2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR   THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE STREET TREES AND   RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH   THIS PETITION.       3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR   THE MAINTENANCE OF THE, ROAD RIGHT OF WAY   LANDSCAPING/TREES AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH   A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-19-2021 Cont ID   Sent By aburnett Date 07-19-2021 Time 11:53 Rev Time 0.00 Received By aburnett Date 07-19-2021 Time 11:53 Sent To   Notes 2021-07-19 11:54:58 ANDREW BURNETT, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1562   REVIEW: FLAGLER TOWERS 7/20/21   1. SATISFIED THE PLEACHING OR SHAPING OF TREES IS   PROHIBITED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AND IS   CONSIDERED TREE ABUSE. STANDARDS FOR TRIMMING SHALL BE   PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST PRUNING   STANDARDS FOR SHADE TREES RECOMMENDED BY THE NATIONAL   ARBORIST ASSOCIATION. 94-446 B 1-5       2. SATISFIED MULTIPLE TREES ALONG CURRIE CRESCENT ARE   SHOWN TO BE PLANTED ON THE WATER AND STORMWATER LINES.   ADJUST PLANTINGS IN CONFLICT WITH UTILITIES.       3. SATISFIED PROVIDE THE CALCULATION FOR THE   INTERRUPTIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ON THE PROPERTY   LINES. UPDATE/ADJUST TREE COUNT CALCULATIONS BUFFER   1/30 FEET.       A. FLAGLER ? 9? UNABLE TO TELL TREE COUNT.   B. SOUTH DIANA PL ? UPDATE TO REFLECT THAT 19 TREES ARE   REQUIRED (NEED TO ROUND UP FOR ANY FRACTION OF A TREE).   INCLUDING THE PALMS ON THE CORNER THE SOUTH SIDE BUFFER   REQUIREMENT APPEARS TO BE MET .   C. OLIVE ? 7? THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER TREES ARE TO BE   INSTALLED ON- SITE, THEY CAN?T BE PLANTING ON THE RIGHT   - OF ? WAY AND COUNT TOWARD MEETING CODE.   D. CURRIE CRESCENT- 9? UNABLE TO TELL. AT LEAST ONE   SHADE TREE SHALL BE PLANTED EVERY LINEAR FEET OR   PORTION THEREOF. RELOCATED PALMS CANNOT ALL BE PLANTED   IN THE SAME AREA DUE TO CODE SHADE TREE REQUIREMENTS.   SEC. 94-443 A. ? F.   E. NORTH PROPERTY LINE ? APPEARS TO HAVE 12 SEA GRAPE.   REQUIREMENT MET.               4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED DUE TO THE CONSTRUCTION IMPACT   ON THE EXISTING MATURE TREES ON CITY PROPERTY ALONG   DIANA PL. REMOVE FICUS TREES AND REPLACE WITH 1 TO 1   CATEGORY SHADE TREE. (SEE #5)       7/20/2021   5. THE USE OF LIVE OAK OR MAHOGANY WOULD BE PREFERRED   FOR SUGGESTED REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF FICUS. ZONING   WILL CONDUCT ADDITIONAL INVESTIGATION ON FEASIBILITY OF   REMOVAL, REPLACEMENT AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES   OF TREES ON ACTAEON PL.       6. UPDATE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN TO REFLECT PROPOSED   TREE TO BE REMOVED ON ACTAEON.       7. TREE #1479 ON TREE LIST WILL NEED TO BE LISTED AS   REMOVE TO REFLECT DEPICTION ON THE MAP. PAGE D-1       8. APPLICANT NEEDS PROVIDE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR POOL   TERRACE PAGE LA 3-1       9. LIVE OAK TREES ON FLAGLER APPEAR TO BE IN CONFLICT   WITH MAN HOLE COVERS AND STORM WATER LINE. ADJUST LINE   OR TREE LOCATIONS TO RESOLVE       10. LIVE OAK ON SOUTH SIDE BUFFER APPEARS TO BE TO   CLOSE TO BUILDING AND ENTRY CANOPY AND WILL OUT GROW   ITS SPACE CREATING A CONFLICT WITH THE BUILDING AND   SHADE CANOPY. THIS COULD BE A BETTER LOCATION FOR LARGE   SCALE PALM ..... ROYAL, BISMARK, MEDJOOL.       11. UNABLE TO FIND INFORMATION ON PLAN REGARDING   PLANTING SOIL       12. IN EAST SIDE COURTYARD THERE IS A STRAY UNMARKED   DIAGONAL LINE GOING ACROSS . IDENTIFY LINE OR REMOVE IF   ITS NOT INTENTIONAL.       SEINOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER WILL RETURN ON 7/22 PLAN IS   SUBJECT TO HIS REVIEW       CONDITION OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.       2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR   THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE STREET TREES AND   RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH   THIS PETITION.       3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR   THE MAINTENANCE OF THE, ROAD RIGHT OF WAY   LANDSCAPING/TREES AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH   A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date 06-07-2021 Time   Rev Time   Received By   Date 06-07-2021 Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-06-07 11:49:11 1. THE PLEACHING OR SHAPING OF TREES IS PROHIBITED BY   THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AND IS CONSIDERED TREE   ABUSE. STANDARDS FOR TRIMMING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN   ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST PRUNING STANDARDS FOR SHADE   TREES RECOMMENDED BY THE NATIONAL ARBORIST ASSOCIATION.   94-446 B 1-5       2. MULTIPLE TREES ALONG CURRIE CRESCENT ARE SHOWN TO BE   PLANTED ON THE WATER AND STORMWATER LINES. ADJUST   PLANTINGS IN CONFLICT WITH UTILITIES.       3. PROVIDE THE CALCULATION FOR THE INTERRUPTIONS IN THE   LANDSCAPE BUFFER ON THE PROPERTY LINES. UPDATE/ADJUST   TREE COUNT CALCULATIONS BUFFER 1/30 FEET.       A. FLAGLER ? 9? UNABLE TO TELL TREE COUNT.   B. SOUTH DIANA PL ? UPDATE TO REFLECT THAT 19 TREES ARE   REQUIRED (NEED TO ROUND UP FOR ANY FRACTION OF A TREE).   INCLUDING THE PALMS ON THE CORNER THE SOUTH SIDE BUFFER   REQUIREMENT APPEARS TO BE MET .   C. OLIVE ? 7? THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER TREES ARE TO BE   INSTALLED ON- SITE, THEY CAN?T BE PLANTING ON THE RIGHT   - OF ? WAY AND COUNT TOWARD MEETING CODE.   D. CURRIE CRESCENT- 9? UNABLE TO TELL. AT LEAST ONE   SHADE TREE SHALL BE PLANTED EVERY LINEAR FEET OR   PORTION THEREOF. RELOCATED PALMS CANNOT ALL BE PLANTED   IN THE SAME AREA DUE TO CODE SHADE TREE REQUIREMENTS.   SEC. 94-443 A. ? F.   E. NORTH PROPERTY LINE ? APPEARS TO HAVE 12 SEA GRAPE.   REQUIREMENT MET.               4. DUE TO THE CONSTRUCTION IMPACT ON THE EXISTING   MATURE TREES ON CITY PROPERTY ALONG DIANA PL. REMOVE   FICUS TREES AND REPLACE WITH 1 TO 1 CATEGORY SHADE   TREE.           ANDREW BURNETT   561-822-1562 Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS Rev No 2 Status P Date 07-01-2021 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 07-01-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date 07-01-2021 Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-07-01 12:38:29 PASSED WITH A PRIVISO FOR THE ROLL-OUT CONTAINERS TO BE   FRONT LOAD TYPE.       MATT HEJAZI   DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS   [email protected]   561-822-2045     Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-07-2021 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 06-07-2021 Time   Rev Time   Received By   Date 06-07-2021 Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-06-07 14:31:15 PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:   1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID   WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE, TYPE AND   QUANTITY OF THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR)   THAT WILL BE UTILIZED THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE   SANITATION SERVICE.   2- DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL. FOR A FREESTANDING SITE   DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, THE ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE   LATEST REVISION OF CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL   CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE STANDARD, GC-7.   3- AUTOTURN EXHIBIT (DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE VEHICLES   WHEEL PATH) FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER   TRUCK WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECS:   - DUAL AXLES   - TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT   - TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT   - TURNING RADIUS:   - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT   - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT   - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT   4- DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP AND   RECYCLING CONTAINERS           MATT HEJAZI   DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS   [email protected]   561-822-2045 Review Stop STORM STORMWATER Rev No 6 Status P Date 11-05-2021 Cont ID   Sent By tward Date 11-05-2021 Time 13:47 Rev Time 0.00 Received By tward Date 11-05-2021 Time 13:50 Sent To   Notes 2021-11-05 13:50:10 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE   OCTOBER 29, 2021 PLAN SUBMITTAL.       1. [CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL - COORDINATE THE   GRADING OF CURRIE CRESCENT WITH THE FORTE RESIDENCES   DEVELOPMENT.] PROPOSED GRADES AT EAST CURB OF CURRIE   CRESCENT AT THE INTERFACE BETWEEN THE 9/8/21 FORTE   RESIDENCES GRADING PLAN AND THE 9/13/21 FLAGLER TOWERS   GRADING PLAN APPEAR TO MATCH. [SEE NEW COMMENT 31   BELOW]       2. [SATISFIED] FLAGLER TOWERS GRADING PLAN SHOWS A SPOT   GRADE OF 11.07 AT THE PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE.   THIS GRADE WILL CAUSE WATER TO POND IN THE DRIVEWAY   GUTTER TO THE NORTH (WHICH HAS SPOT GRADES OF 10.93 ON   THE SOUTH SIDE AND 11.18 ME ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE   DRIVEWAY APRON.       3. [SATISFIED] MAINTAIN CROWN CROSS SECTION OF CURRIE   CRESCENT.       4. [SATISFIED] REQUESTED DIMENSIONS WERE ONLY PROVIDE   FOR SECTIONS B-B, C-C, D-D, H-H, AND J-J. PREVIOUS   COMMENT: FOR THE CROSS SECTIONS ON SHEET C-501, PROVIDE   DIMENSIONS FROM PROPERTY LINE/RIGHT OF WAY LINE TO   VALLEY GUTTER OR BACK OF SIDEWALK.       5. [SATISFIED] SIDEWALK ACROSS WEST DRIVEWAY TO CURRIE   CRESCENT SHALL SLOPE TOWARD THE STREET. THE HIGH POINT   OF THE DRIVEWAY SHALL BE SUFFICIENT TO PREVENT   STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THE RIGHT OF WAY FROM FLOWING   DOWN THE DRIVEWAY TOWARD THE BUILDING AND AT THE SAME   TIME MINIMIZE THE AREA OF THE DRIVEWAY SLOPING TOWARD   THE ROAD (I.E. MAXIMIZE THE DRIVEWAY SLOPE BETWEEN THE   HIGH POINT AND THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK.)] SUGGEST   SLOPING THE SIDEWALK PORTION OF THE DRIVEWAY SHOWN IN   SECTION B-B TOWARD THE VALLEY GUTTER. THE GRADES SHOWN   ON SHEET C-500 FOR THE DRIVEWAY WITH SECTION B-B (10.72   AT EP AND 10.70/10.84 AT BOW ACROSS DRIVEWAY) DO NOT   MATCH THE GRADES SHOWN ON SECTION B-B ON SHEET C-501   (11.00 AT EP AND 11.04 AT BACK OF CROSSWALK [HIGH POINT   OF DRIVEWAY]). SECTION B-B SHOWS LESS THAN 1/2 INCH   DROP (0.04 FT) BETWEEN BACK OF WALK AND EP. THIS SHORT   RISE WILL NOT STOP MUCH ROADWAY STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM   FLOWING DOWN THE DRIVEWAY. THE GRADING PLAN DOESN?T   APPEAR TO SUPPORT ALL OF THE CROSSWALK/SIDEWALK SLOPING   TOWARD THE ROAD.       6. [SATISFIED - SLOPES REMOVED FROM SHEET G-203.]   PREVIOUS COMMENT: SECTION D-D SHOWS 13.5% SLOPE EAST OF   THE PROPERTY LINE. SHEET G-203 SHOWS 7.5% RAMP UP.   PREVIOUS COMMENT: COORDINATE THE SLOPES SHOWN FOR THE   DRIVEWAYS WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. FOR EXAMPLE,   SECTION C-C SHOWS 3.4% SLOPE BETWEEN THE BUILDING AND   VALLEY GUTTER. SHEET A-101 SHOWS THE DRIVEWAY AT 7.5%   SLOPE.       7. [SATISFIED] SECTION D-D: PROVIDE SIDEWALK AREA WITH   SLOPE NO STEEPER THAN 2%.       8. [SATISFIED] SECTION E-E: CORRECT LABELS FOR ROAD   CENTERLINE AND PROPERTY LINE.       9. [SATISFIED] [CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL -   PARALLEL PARKING SPACES ON DIANA PLACE SHALL SLOPE TO   THE PROPOSED NORTH TYPE 'D' CURB AT MINIMUM 2% CROSS   SLOPE. LANDSCAPE AREA BETWEEN BACK CURB AND 10 FT   SIDEWALK SHALL HAVE 4:1 OR FLATTER SLOPE. THE 6.8 FT   LONG SIDEWALK CONNECTORS BETWEEN 10 FT WIDE SIDEWALK   AND THE PROPERTY LINE CAN SLOPE UP TO 7.2% (EQUATES TO   LESS THAN 0.5 FT DROP) WITHOUT NEEDING HANDRAILS.   DRAINAGE STRUCTURE AND STORM PIPE WILL BE NEEDED AT   EAST END OF PARALLEL PARKING SPACES TO COLLECT   STORMWATER RUNOFF AND CONVEY TO EXISTING DRAINAGE   STRUCTURE.] (PREVIOUS COMMENT- GRADING OF THE AREA   BETWEEN THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE AND THE CENTER LINE OF   DIANA PLACE CAN BE A CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO   BE WORKED OUT DURING ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.]   REVISED COMMENT: THE GRADING BETWEEN THE ROAD   CENTERLINE AND R/W, AS SHOWN ON SECTIONS H-H THROUGH   J-J NEEDS FURTHER REFINEMENT. SINCE STEPS ARE BEING   PROPOSED TO MAKE UP THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE   FINISHED FLOORS OF THE HOUSING UNITS AND THE DIANA   PLACE PARCEL, MAINTAIN NORMAL CROWN FOR DIANA PLACE AND   SLOPE THE PARKING TOWARD THE PROPOSED CURB LINE. FOR   SECTION J-J, THE LANDSCAPE AREA SHOULD MEET THE TOP OF   CURB. FOR SECTION J-J, SLOPE THE SIDEWALK TOWARD THE   ROAD AND INSTALL A CATCH BASIN IN THE SMALL LANDSCAPE   AREA AND CONNECT INTO THE CURB INLET ON THE STREET.   PROVIDE SECTION(S) ON EITHER SIDE OF THE STEPS TO SHOW   HOW THE AREA BETWEEN THE STEPS WILL SLOPE.       10. [SATISFIED] IT APPEARS THE TOWNHOME AT THE WEST END   OF THE PROJECT WILL HOLD WATER BEHIND THE DIANA PLACE   SIDEWALK.       11. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION FROM THE NORTH   PROPERTY LINE TO THE FACE OF THE BUILDING INCLUDING   DIMENSIONS TO THE OUTSIDE OF THE UNDERGROUND PARKING   GARAGE.       12. [SATISFIED - CONDITION OF ENGINEERING PERMIT   APPROVAL - FOR THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH ALONG THE NORTH   PROPERTY LINE, THE SFWMD TRENCH EQUATION WILL HAVE TO   BE MODIFIED TO ACCOUNT FOR THE RETAINING WALL ON ONE   SIDE AND POSSIBLE GARAGE WALL ON THE OTHER THAT WILL   LIMIT THE FLOW OUT OF THE TRENCH.]       13. [SATISFIED] EXPLAIN HOW THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH   ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE WILL BE MAINTAINED,   INCLUDING POSSIBLE REPLACEMENT, WHEN IT HAS LOST ITS   DISPOSAL CAPACITY IN A FEW YEARS.       14. [NOT SATISFIED. CONDITION OF ENGINEERING PERMIT   APPROVAL - PROVIDE AN EXFILTRATION TRENCH DETAIL,   LABELING THE TRENCH WIDTH AND THE ELEVATIONS FOR THE   TOP OF TRENCH, THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH, AND THE PIPE   INVERT.]       15. [NOT SATISFIED. CONDITION OF ENGINEERING PERMIT   APPROVAL - PROVIDE DETAIL OF CONTROL STRUCTURE(S). NOTE   BLEEDERS CANNOT BE USED AS PART OF THE CONTROL TO   SURCHARGE THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH.]       16. [SATISFIED] SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING LIMITS ON   CURRIE CRESCENT (BECAUSE OF THE TRENCH CUTS AND THE   CHANGE IN PAVEMENT MARKINGS FOR THE PARKING SPACES).   PREVIOUS COMMENT: SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING LIMITS FOR   TRENCH CUTS IN THE ROADWAY PER CITY'S STANDARD DETAIL   GC-8.       17. [SATISFIED] CONVERT EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE IN   THE EXISTING SOUTH DRIVEWAY TO S. FLAGLER DRIVE TO A   CATCH BASIN WITH A HOODED FRAME AND GRATE. THE   STRUCTURE MAY NEED TO BE ENLARGED IN ORDER TO CONNECT   THE PROPOSED 15-INCH RCP FROM THE DEVELOPMENT.       18. [SATISFIED - CONDITION OF ENGINEERING PERMIT   APPROVAL - DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN TO CONSIDER SEA LEVEL   RISE.]       19. [SATISFIED - PIPE WAS REMOVED] WHAT IS THE PURPOSE   OF THE 6-INCH HDPE PIPE BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND EAST   PROPERTY LINE?       20. [SATISFIED. CONDITION OF ENGINEERING PERMIT   APPROVAL - THE ROOF DRAIN SYSTEM WILL NEED TO BE   DESIGNED SO THAT MANHOLE LIDS ARE NOT DISPLACED BY THE   PRESSURE OF THE WATER OR TRAPPED AIR IN THE ROOF   DOWNSPOUTS.]       21. [SATISFIED] IT APPEARS THE TOWNHOME AT THE WEST END   OF THE PROJECT WILL HOLD WATER BEHIND THE DIANA PLACE   SIDEWALK.       22. [SATISFIED - WATER QUALITY TREATMENT PER SFWMD ERP   SHALL BE DESIGNED AND PROVIDED FOR THE ADDITIONAL   IMPERVIOUS AREA IN THE DIANA PLACE PARCEL.] NEW COMMENT   ? FINAL LAYOUT AND DESIGN OF DRAINAGE SYSTEMS ON DIANA   PLACE TO BE WORKED OUT DURING ENGINEERING PERMIT   SUBMITTAL.       23. [SATISFIED - DRAINAGE SYSTEM SHOWN ON THE RECENTLY   SUBMITTED FORTE RESIDENCES PLANS.] SHEET C-500 SHOWS   PROPOSED STORM PIPE ALONG THE NORTH CURB OF CURRIE   CRESCENT AND CATCH BASINS NEAR THE EAST END OF THE   STREET BUT NO INFORMATION IS PROVIDED FOR THESE. THE   SIDEWALK AND CURB SHOULD BE SHOWN TO BE REPLACED AND   PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT IN THE WESTBOUND LANE OF   CURRIE CRESCENT FOR THE STORM PIPE AND ON S. OLIVE AVE   FOR THE DRAINAGE MANHOLE. THE CURB RAMP ON THE NE   CORNER OF S. OLIVE AND CURRIE CRESCENT WILL NEED TO BE   CONSTRUCTED TO CURRENT ADA CRITERIA.       24. SATISFIED - GRADES MODIFIED] FOR THE NORTH DRIVEWAY   TO CURRIE CRESCENT, SHEET C-500 SHOWS SPOT GRADES OF   10.92 AND 10.60+/-ME FOR THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT NEXT TO   THE DROP CURB/VALLEY GUTTER. CROSS SECTION D-D PROVIDES   A SPOT GRADE OF 11.07 FOR THE EP NEXT TO THE DROP   CURB/VALLEY GUTTER.       25. [SATISFIED - SPOT GRADES REMOVED FROM ARCHITECTURAL   PLANS] SECTION D-D ON SHEET C-500 SHOWS A SPOT GRADE OF   11.86 AT THE PROPERTY LINE. SHEETS G-201 AND G-203 SHOW   A SPOT GRADE OF 11FT 3IN AT THE PROPERTY LINE.       26. [SATISFIED - SPOT GRADES REMOVED FROM ARCHITECTURAL   PLANS] AT THE NORTH DRIVEWAY TO S. FLAGLER DRIVE, SHEET   C-500 SHOWS THE PROPERTY LINE AT AN ELEVATION LESS THAN   3.98 FT NAVD. SHEET G-203 SHOWS AN ELEVATION OF 4FT 3IN   AT THE PROPERTY LINE CROSSING THE DRIVEWAY.       27. [SATISFIED] - GRADES FOR CROSS SECTIONS SHOWN ON   SHEET C-501 SHALL AGREE WITH THE GRADING PLAN ON SHEET   C-500.   A. SECTION B-B SHOWS EP GRADE OF 11.00; GRADING PLAN   SHOWS SPOT GRADE OF 10.72.   B. SECTION C-C SHOWS BACK OF GUTTER ELEVATION OF 11.18;   GRADING PLAN SHOWS EP SPOT GRADE OF 10.72.   C. SECTION D-D SHOWS SPOT GRADE OF 11.83 AT THE   PROPERTY LINE/FRONT OF TRENCH DRAIN; GRADING PLAN CALLS   OUT TRENCH DRAIN RIM ELEVATION OF 12.90.   D. SECTIONS H-H, I-I AND J-J TO BE MODIFIED PER COMMENT   NO. 9.       28. CONSIDER MOVING THE CONTROL STRUCTURE OUT OF THE   SIDEWALK BETWEEN S. OLIVE AVE AND THE RESTAURANT/CAFE.       29. FORTE RESIDENCES DEVELOPMENT WAS INSTRUCTED TO MOVE   THE 5 FT WIDE SIDEWALK ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CURRIE   CRESCENT TO THE NORTH R/W LINE. THIS WILL REDUCE THE   WIDTH OF THE ROAD AND MAY IMPACT THE AUTOTURN ANALYSES   FOR FLAGLER TOWERS.       30. [SATISFIED] THE FRAME AND COVER OF THE PROPOSED   SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE WHERE CURRIE CRESCENT TURNS   NORTH SHALL NOT BE WITHIN THE CURB AND GUTTER. THE RIM   ELEVATION FOR THIS STRUCTURE (10.43) DOES NOT MATCH THE   GRADING PLAN (11.07).       NEW COMMENTS:   31. FORTE RESIDENCES? EOR TO JUSTIFY THE PROPOSED CROSS   SLOPES OF CURRIE CRESCENT OR FLATTEN THEM TO MEET THE   FLORIDA GREEN BOOK.       32. TYPE 'C' DETAIL HAS NOTE THAT WEIRS OR PRBS ARE NOT   TO BE USED IN THIS TYPE OF STRUCTURE. THERE IS A   PROPOSED TYPE 'C' INLET WITH PRB CALLED OUT IN THE   NORTH FRONTAGE ALONG S. OLIVE AVE. [CAN BE ADDRESSED   WITH ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL]       33. SHOW SWALE WHERE THE TOP OF CURB ELEVATION IS   HIGHER THAN THE FRONT OF WALK ELEVATION ALONG DIANA   PLACE (NEAR WEST END OF THE PARALLEL PARKING SPACES).   [CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL]           TRACY WARD, PE   SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT   561-494-1120 (O)   561-351-0510 (M)   [email protected]     Review Stop STORM STORMWATER Rev No 5 Status P Date 09-28-2021 Cont ID   Sent By tward Date 09-28-2021 Time 17:23 Rev Time 0.00 Received By tward Date 09-28-2021 Time 17:23 Sent To   Notes 2021-09-28 17:23:40 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE   SEPTEMBER 13, 2021 PLAN SUBMITTAL.       1. [CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL - COORDINATE THE   GRADING OF CURRIE CRESCENT WITH THE FORTE RESIDENCES   DEVELOPMENT.] PROPOSED GRADES AT EAST CURB OF CURRIE   CRESCENT AT THE INTERFACE BETWEEN THE 9/8/21 FORTE   RESIDENCES GRADING PLAN AND THE 9/13/21 FLAGLER TOWERS   GRADING PLAN APPEAR TO MATCH. NOTE COMMENTS ON THE   9/8/21 FORTE RESIDENCES GRADING PLAN FOR CURRIE   CRESCENT MAY CHANGE THE PROPOSED GRADES OF CURRIE   CRESCENT. (PREVIOUS COMMENT: COORDINATE THE GRADING OF   CURRIE CRESCENT WITH THE FLAGLER FORTE DEVELOPMENT).       2. [CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL - CURRIE CRESCENT   CURB AND GUTTER TO HAVE POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO THE STREET   DRAINAGE SYSTEM.] FLAGLER TOWERS GRADING PLAN SHOWS A   SPOT GRADE OF 11.07 AT THE PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER   MANHOLE. THIS GRADE WILL CAUSE WATER TO POND IN THE   DRIVEWAY GUTTER TO THE NORTH (WHICH HAS SPOT GRADES OF   10.93 ON THE SOUTH SIDE AND 11.18 ME ON THE NORTH SIDE   OF THE DRIVEWAY APRON.       3. [CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL - MAINTAIN CROWN   CROSS SECTION OF CURRIE CRESCENT.]       4. [SATISFIED] REQUESTED DIMENSIONS WERE ONLY PROVIDE   FOR SECTIONS B-B, C-C, D-D, H-H, AND J-J. PREVIOUS   COMMENT: FOR THE CROSS SECTIONS ON SHEET C-501, PROVIDE   DIMENSIONS FROM PROPERTY LINE/RIGHT OF WAY LINE TO   VALLEY GUTTER OR BACK OF SIDEWALK.       5. [NOT SATISFIED] [CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL -   SIDEWALK ACROSS WEST DRIVEWAY TO CURRIE CRESCENT SHALL   SLOPE TOWARD THE STREET. THE HIGH POINT OF THE DRIVEWAY   SHALL BE SUFFICIENT TO PREVENT STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM   THE RIGHT OF WAY FROM FLOWING DOWN THE DRIVEWAY TOWARD   THE BUILDING AND AT THE SAME TIME MINIMIZE THE AREA OF   THE DRIVEWAY SLOPING TOWARD THE ROAD (I.E. MAXIMIZE THE   DRIVEWAY SLOPE BETWEEN THE HIGH POINT AND THE BACK OF   THE SIDEWALK.)] SUGGEST SLOPING THE SIDEWALK PORTION OF   THE DRIVEWAY SHOWN IN SECTION B-B TOWARD THE VALLEY   GUTTER. THE GRADES SHOWN ON SHEET C-500 FOR THE   DRIVEWAY WITH SECTION B-B (10.72 AT EP AND 10.70/10.84   AT BOW ACROSS DRIVEWAY) DO NOT MATCH THE GRADES SHOWN   ON SECTION B-B ON SHEET C-501 (11.00 AT EP AND 11.04 AT   BACK OF CROSSWALK [HIGH POINT OF DRIVEWAY]). SECTION   B-B SHOWS LESS THAN 1/2 INCH DROP (0.04 FT) BETWEEN   BACK OF WALK AND EP. THIS SHORT RISE WILL NOT STOP MUCH   ROADWAY STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM FLOWING DOWN THE   DRIVEWAY. THE GRADING PLAN DOESN?T APPEAR TO SUPPORT   ALL OF THE CROSSWALK/SIDEWALK SLOPING TOWARD THE ROAD.       6. [SATISFIED - SLOPES REMOVED FROM SHEET G-203.]   PREVIOUS COMMENT: SECTION D-D SHOWS 13.5% SLOPE EAST OF   THE PROPERTY LINE. SHEET G-203 SHOWS 7.5% RAMP UP.   PREVIOUS COMMENT: COORDINATE THE SLOPES SHOWN FOR THE   DRIVEWAYS WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. FOR EXAMPLE,   SECTION C-C SHOWS 3.4% SLOPE BETWEEN THE BUILDING AND   VALLEY GUTTER. SHEET A-101 SHOWS THE DRIVEWAY AT 7.5%   SLOPE.       7. {SATISFIED] SECTION D-D: PROVIDE SIDEWALK AREA WITH   SLOPE NO STEEPER THAN 2%.       8. [SATISFIED] SECTION E-E: CORRECT LABELS FOR ROAD   CENTERLINE AND PROPERTY LINE.       9. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] [CONDITION OF SITE PLAN   APPROVAL - PARALLEL PARKING SPACES ON DIANA PLACE SHALL   SLOPE TO THE PROPOSED NORTH TYPE 'D' CURB AT MINIMUM 2%   CROSS SLOPE. LANDSCAPE AREA BETWEEN BACK CURB AND 10 FT   SIDEWALK SHALL HAVE 4:1 OR FLATTER SLOPE. THE 6.8 FT   LONG SIDEWALK CONNECTORS BETWEEN 10 FT WIDE SIDEWALK   AND THE PROPERTY LINE CAN SLOPE UP TO 7.2% (EQUATES TO   LESS THAN 0.5 FT DROP) WITHOUT NEEDING HANDRAILS.   DRAINAGE STRUCTURE AND STORM PIPE WILL BE NEEDED AT   EAST END OF PARALLEL PARKING SPACES TO COLLECT   STORMWATER RUNOFF AND CONVEY TO EXISTING DRAINAGE   STRUCTURE.] (PREVIOUS COMMENT- GRADING OF THE AREA   BETWEEN THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE AND THE CENTER LINE OF   DIANA PLACE CAN BE A CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO   BE WORKED OUT DURING ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.]   REVISED COMMENT: THE GRADING BETWEEN THE ROAD   CENTERLINE AND R/W, AS SHOWN ON SECTIONS H-H THROUGH   J-J NEEDS FURTHER REFINEMENT. SINCE STEPS ARE BEING   PROPOSED TO MAKE UP THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE   FINISHED FLOORS OF THE HOUSING UNITS AND THE DIANA   PLACE PARCEL, MAINTAIN NORMAL CROWN FOR DIANA PLACE AND   SLOPE THE PARKING TOWARD THE PROPOSED CURB LINE. FOR   SECTION J-J, THE LANDSCAPE AREA SHOULD MEET THE TOP OF   CURB. FOR SECTION J-J, SLOPE THE SIDEWALK TOWARD THE   ROAD AND INSTALL A CATCH BASIN IN THE SMALL LANDSCAPE   AREA AND CONNECT INTO THE CURB INLET ON THE STREET.   PROVIDE SECTION(S) ON EITHER SIDE OF THE STEPS TO SHOW   HOW THE AREA BETWEEN THE STEPS WILL SLOPE.       10. [SATISFIED] IT APPEARS THE TOWNHOME AT THE WEST END   OF THE PROJECT WILL HOLD WATER BEHIND THE DIANA PLACE   SIDEWALK.       11. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION FROM THE NORTH   PROPERTY LINE TO THE FACE OF THE BUILDING INCLUDING   DIMENSIONS TO THE OUTSIDE OF THE UNDERGROUND PARKING   GARAGE.       12. [SATISFIED - CONDITION OF ENGINEERING PERMIT   APPROVAL - FOR THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH ALONG THE NORTH   PROPERTY LINE, THE SFWMD TRENCH EQUATION WILL HAVE TO   BE MODIFIED TO ACCOUNT FOR THE RETAINING WALL ON ONE   SIDE AND POSSIBLE GARAGE WALL ON THE OTHER THAT WILL   LIMIT THE FLOW OUT OF THE TRENCH.]       13. [SATISFIED] EXPLAIN HOW THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH   ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE WILL BE MAINTAINED,   INCLUDING POSSIBLE REPLACEMENT, WHEN IT HAS LOST ITS   DISPOSAL CAPACITY IN A FEW YEARS.       14. [NOT SATISFIED. CONDITION OF ENGINEERING PERMIT   APPROVAL - PROVIDE AN EXFILTRATION TRENCH DETAIL,   LABELING THE TRENCH WIDTH AND THE ELEVATIONS FOR THE   TOP OF TRENCH, THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH, AND THE PIPE   INVERT.]       15. [NOT SATISFIED. CONDITION OF ENGINEERING PERMIT   APPROVAL - PROVIDE DETAIL OF CONTROL STRUCTURE(S). NOTE   BLEEDERS CANNOT BE USED AS PART OF THE CONTROL TO   SURCHARGE THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH.]       16. [SATISFIED] SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING LIMITS ON   CURRIE CRESCENT (BECAUSE OF THE TRENCH CUTS AND THE   CHANGE IN PAVEMENT MARKINGS FOR THE PARKING SPACES).   PREVIOUS COMMENT: SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING LIMITS FOR   TRENCH CUTS IN THE ROADWAY PER CITY'S STANDARD DETAIL   GC-8.       17. [SATISFIED] CONVERT EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE IN   THE EXISTING SOUTH DRIVEWAY TO S. FLAGLER DRIVE TO A   CATCH BASIN WITH A HOODED FRAME AND GRATE. THE   STRUCTURE MAY NEED TO BE ENLARGED IN ORDER TO CONNECT   THE PROPOSED 15-INCH RCP FROM THE DEVELOPMENT.       18. [SATISFIED - CONDITION OF ENGINEERING PERMIT   APPROVAL - DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN TO CONSIDER SEA LEVEL   RISE.]       19. [SATISFIED - PIPE WAS REMOVED] WHAT IS THE PURPOSE   OF THE 6-INCH HDPE PIPE BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND EAST   PROPERTY LINE?       20. [SATISFIED. CONDITION OF ENGINEERING PERMIT   APPROVAL - THE ROOF DRAIN SYSTEM WILL NEED TO BE   DESIGNED SO THAT MANHOLE LIDS ARE NOT DISPLACED BY THE   PRESSURE OF THE WATER OR TRAPPED AIR IN THE ROOF   DOWNSPOUTS.]       21. [SATISFIED] IT APPEARS THE TOWNHOME AT THE WEST END   OF THE PROJECT WILL HOLD WATER BEHIND THE DIANA PLACE   SIDEWALK.       22. [CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL - WATER QUALITY   TREATMENT PER SFWMD ERP SHALL BE DESIGNED AND PROVIDED   FOR THE ADDITIONAL IMPERVIOUS AREA IN THE DIANA PLACE   PARCEL.] WHAT DRAINAGE MITIGATION (WATER QUALITY AND   PEAK FLOW ATTENUATION) IS PROPOSED FOR THE ADDITIONAL   IMPERVIOUS AREA IN THE DIANA PLACE PARCEL.       23. [SATISFIED - DRAINAGE SYSTEM SHOWN ON THE RECENTLY   SUBMITTED FORTE RESIDENCES PLANS.] SHEET C-500 SHOWS   PROPOSED STORM PIPE ALONG THE NORTH CURB OF CURRIE   CRESCENT AND CATCH BASINS NEAR THE EAST END OF THE   STREET BUT NO INFORMATION IS PROVIDED FOR THESE. THE   SIDEWALK AND CURB SHOULD BE SHOWN TO BE REPLACED AND   PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT IN THE WESTBOUND LANE OF   CURRIE CRESCENT FOR THE STORM PIPE AND ON S. OLIVE AVE   FOR THE DRAINAGE MANHOLE. THE CURB RAMP ON THE NE   CORNER OF S. OLIVE AND CURRIE CRESCENT WILL NEED TO BE   CONSTRUCTED TO CURRENT ADA CRITERIA.       24. SATISFIED - GRADES MODIFIED] FOR THE NORTH DRIVEWAY   TO CURRIE CRESCENT, SHEET C-500 SHOWS SPOT GRADES OF   10.92 AND 10.60+/-ME FOR THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT NEXT TO   THE DROP CURB/VALLEY GUTTER. CROSS SECTION D-D PROVIDES   A SPOT GRADE OF 11.07 FOR THE EP NEXT TO THE DROP   CURB/VALLEY GUTTER.       25. [SATISFIED - SPOT GRADES REMOVED FROM ARCHITECTURAL   PLANS] SECTION D-D ON SHEET C-500 SHOWS A SPOT GRADE OF   11.86 AT THE PROPERTY LINE. SHEETS G-201 AND G-203 SHOW   A SPOT GRADE OF 11FT 3IN AT THE PROPERTY LINE.       26. [SATISFIED - SPOT GRADES REMOVED FROM ARCHITECTURAL   PLANS] AT THE NORTH DRIVEWAY TO S. FLAGLER DRIVE, SHEET   C-500 SHOWS THE PROPERTY LINE AT AN ELEVATION LESS THAN   3.98 FT NAVD. SHEET G-203 SHOWS AN ELEVATION OF 4FT 3IN   AT THE PROPERTY LINE CROSSING THE DRIVEWAY.       NEW COMMENTS:   27. [CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL - GRADES FOR CROSS   SECTIONS SHOWN ON SHEET C-501 SHALL AGREE WITH THE   GRADING PLAN ON SHEET C-500.]   A. SECTION B-B SHOWS EP GRADE OF 11.00; GRADING PLAN   SHOWS SPOT GRADE OF 10.72.   B. SECTION C-C SHOWS BACK OF GUTTER ELEVATION OF 11.18;   GRADING PLAN SHOWS EP SPOT GRADE OF 10.72.   C. SECTION D-D SHOWS SPOT GRADE OF 11.83 AT THE   PROPERTY LINE/FRONT OF TRENCH DRAIN; GRADING PLAN CALLS   OUT TRENCH DRAIN RIM ELEVATION OF 12.90.   D. SECTIONS H-H, I-I AND J-J TO BE MODIFIED PER COMMENT   NO. 9.       28. CONSIDER MOVING THE CONTROL STRUCTURE OUT OF THE   SIDEWALK BETWEEN S. OLIVE AVE AND THE RESTAURANT/CAFE.       29. FORTE RESIDENCES DEVELOPMENT WAS INSTRUCTED TO MOVE   THE 5 FT WIDE SIDEWALK ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CURRIE   CRESCENT TO THE NORTH R/W LINE. THIS WILL REDUCE THE   WIDTH OF THE ROAD AND MAY IMPACT THE AUTOTURN ANALYSES   FOR FLAGLER TOWERS.       30. THE FRAME AND COVER OF THE PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER   MANHOLE WHERE CURRIE CRESCENT TURNS NORTH SHALL NOT BE   WITHIN THE CURB AND GUTTER. THE RIM ELEVATION FOR THIS   STRUCTURE (10.43) DOES NOT MATCH THE GRADING PLAN   (11.07).               TRACY WARD, PE   SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT   561-494-1120 (O)   561-351-0510 (M)   [email protected]     Review Stop STORM STORMWATER Rev No 4 Status F Date 09-01-2021 Cont ID   Sent By tward Date 09-01-2021 Time 15:14 Rev Time 0.00 Received By tward Date 09-01-2021 Time 15:15 Sent To   Notes 2021-09-01 15:15:04 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE   AUGUST 25, 2021 PLAN SUBMITTAL.       1. [CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL] THERE IS 0.42 FT   DIFFERENCE IN GRADES OF EP SHOWN ON THE FLAGLER FORTE   (11.02' NAVD) AND ON THE FLAGLER TOWER (10.60' NAVD +/-   ME) PLANS. (PREVIOUS COMMENT: COORDINATE THE GRADING OF   CURRIE CRESCENT WITH THE FLAGLER FORTE DEVELOPMENT.       2. [CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL] CURRIE CRESCENT   CURB AND GUTTER TO HAVE POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO THE STREET   DRAINAGE SYSTEM.       3. [CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL] MAINTAIN CROWN   CROSS SECTION OF CURRIE CRESCENT.       4. [SATISFIED] REQUESTED DIMENSIONS WERE ONLY PROVIDE   FOR SECTIONS B-B, C-C, D-D, H-H, AND J-J. PREVIOUS   COMMENT: FOR THE CROSS SECTIONS ON SHEET C-501, PROVIDE   DIMENSIONS FROM PROPERTY LINE/RIGHT OF WAY LINE TO   VALLEY GUTTER OR BACK OF SIDEWALK.       5. [SATISFIED] SUGGEST SLOPING THE SIDEWALK PORTION OF   THE DRIVEWAY SHOWN IN SECTION B-B TOWARD THE VALLEY   GUTTER.       6. [NOT SATISFIED] PREVIOUS COMMENT: SECTION D-D SHOWS   13.5% SLOPE EAST OF THE PROPERTY LINE. SHEET G-203   SHOWS 7.5% RAMP UP. PREVIOUS COMMENT: COORDINATE THE   SLOPES SHOWN FOR THE DRIVEWAYS WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL   PLANS. FOR EXAMPLE, SECTION C-C SHOWS 3.4% SLOPE   BETWEEN THE BUILDING AND VALLEY GUTTER. SHEET A-101   SHOWS THE DRIVEWAY AT 7.5% SLOPE.       7. {SATISFIED] SECTION D-D: PROVIDE SIDEWALK AREA WITH   SLOPE NO STEEPER THAN 2%.       8. [SATISFIED] SECTION E-E: CORRECT LABELS FOR ROAD   CENTERLINE AND PROPERTY LINE.       9. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED - GRADING OF THE AREA BETWEEN   THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE AND THE CENTER LINE OF DIANA   PLACE CAN BE A CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO BE   WORKED OUT DURING ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.]   REVISED COMMENT: THE GRADING BETWEEN THE ROAD   CENTERLINE AND R/W, AS SHOWN ON SECTIONS H-H THROUGH   J-J NEEDS FURTHER REFINEMENT. SINCE STEPS ARE BEING   PROPOSED TO MAKE UP THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE   FINISHED FLOORS OF THE HOUSING UNITS AND THE DIANA   PLACE PARCEL, MAINTAIN NORMAL CROWN FOR DIANA PLACE AND   SLOPE THE PARKING TOWARD THE PROPOSED CURB LINE. FOR   SECTION J-J, THE LANDSCAPE AREA SHOULD MEET THE TOP OF   CURB. FOR SECTION J-J, SLOPE THE SIDEWALK TOWARD THE   ROAD AND INSTALL A CATCH BASIN IN THE SMALL LANDSCAPE   AREA AND CONNECT INTO THE CURB INLET ON THE STREET.   PROVIDE SECTION(S) ON EITHER SIDE OF THE STEPS TO SHOW   HOW THE AREA BETWEEN THE STEPS WILL SLOPE.       10. [SATISFIED] IT APPEARS THE TOWNHOME AT THE WEST END   OF THE PROJECT WILL HOLD WATER BEHIND THE DIANA PLACE   SIDEWALK.       11. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION FROM THE NORTH   PROPERTY LINE TO THE FACE OF THE BUILDING INCLUDING   DIMENSIONS TO THE OUTSIDE OF THE UNDERGROUND PARKING   GARAGE.       12. [SATISFIED - TO BE WORKED OUT AT ENGINEERING PERMIT   SUBMITTAL] FOR THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH ALONG THE NORTH   PROPERTY LINE, THE SFWMD TRENCH EQUATION WILL HAVE TO   BE MODIFIED TO ACCOUNT FOR THE RETAINING WALL ON ONE   SIDE AND POSSIBLE GARAGE WALL ON THE OTHER THAT WILL   LIMIT THE FLOW OUT OF THE TRENCH.       13. [SATISFIED] EXPLAIN HOW THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH   ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE WILL BE MAINTAINED,   INCLUDING POSSIBLE REPLACEMENT, WHEN IT HAS LOST ITS   DISPOSAL CAPACITY IN A FEW YEARS.       14. [NOT SATISFIED. INFORMATION CAN BE PROVIDED WITH   ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL] PROVIDE AN EXFILTRATION   TRENCH DETAIL, LABELING THE TRENCH WIDTH AND THE   ELEVATIONS FOR THE TOP OF TRENCH, THE BOTTOM OF THE   TRENCH, AND THE PIPE INVERT.       15. [NOT SATISFIED. INFORMATION CAN BE PROVIDED WITH   ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL] PROVIDE DETAIL OF CONTROL   STRUCTURE(S). NOTE BLEEDERS CANNOT BE USED AS PART OF   THE CONTROL TO SURCHARGE THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH.       16. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING   LIMITS ON CURRIE CRESCENT (BECAUSE OF THE TRENCH CUTS   AND THE CHANGE IN PAVEMENT MARKINGS FOR THE PARKING   SPACES). PREVIOUS COMMENT: SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING   LIMITS FOR TRENCH CUTS IN THE ROADWAY PER CITY'S   STANDARD DETAIL GC-8.       17. [SATISFIED] CONVERT EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE IN   THE EXISTING SOUTH DRIVEWAY TO S. FLAGLER DRIVE TO A   CATCH BASIN WITH A HOODED FRAME AND GRATE. THE   STRUCTURE MAY NEED TO BE ENLARGED IN ORDER TO CONNECT   THE PROPOSED 15-INCH RCP FROM THE DEVELOPMENT.       18. [SATISFIED - TO BE WORKED OUT AT ENGINEERING PERMIT   SUBMITTAL] DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN TO CONSIDER SEA LEVEL   RISE.       19. [SATISFIED - PIPE WAS REMOVED] WHAT IS THE PURPOSE   OF THE 6-INCH HDPE PIPE BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND EAST   PROPERTY LINE?       20. [SATISFIED - TO BE ADDRESSED DURING FINAL   ENGINEERING DESIGN] THE ROOF DRAIN SYSTEM WILL NEED TO   BE DESIGNED SO THAT MANHOLE LIDS ARE NOT DISPLACED BY   THE PRESSURE OF THE WATER OR TRAPPED AIR IN THE ROOF   DOWNSPOUTS.       21. [SATISFIED] IT APPEARS THE TOWNHOME AT THE WEST END   OF THE PROJECT WILL HOLD WATER BEHIND THE DIANA PLACE   SIDEWALK.       22. [CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL] WHAT DRAINAGE   MITIGATION (WATER QUALITY AND PEAK FLOW ATTENUATION) IS   PROPOSED FOR THE ADDITIONAL IMPERVIOUS AREA IN THE   DIANA PLACE PARCEL.       NEW COMMENTS:   23. SHEET C-500 SHOWS PROPOSED STORM PIPE ALONG THE   NORTH CURB OF CURRIE CRESCENT AND CATCH BASINS NEAR THE   EAST END OF THE STREET BUT NO INFORMATION IS PROVIDED   FOR THESE. THE SIDEWALK AND CURB SHOULD BE SHOWN TO BE   REPLACED AND PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT IN THE WESTBOUND   LANE OF CURRIE CRESCENT FOR THE STORM PIPE AND ON S.   OLIVE AVE FOR THE DRAINAGE MANHOLE. THE CURB RAMP ON   THE NE CORNER OF S. OLIVE AND CURRIE CRESCENT WILL NEED   TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO CURRENT ADA CRITERIA.       24. FOR THE NORTH DRIVEWAY TO CURRIE CRESCENT, SHEET   C-500 SHOWS SPOT GRADES OF 10.92 AND 10.60+/-ME FOR THE   EDGE OF PAVEMENT NEXT TO THE DROP CURB/VALLEY GUTTER.   CROSS SECTION D-D PROVIDES A SPOT GRADE OF 11.07 FOR   THE EP NEXT TO THE DROP CURB/VALLEY GUTTER.       25. SECTION D-D ON SHEET C-500 SHOWS A SPOT GRADE OF   11.86 AT THE PROPERTY LINE. SHEETS G-201 AND G-203 SHOW   A SPOT GRADE OF 11FT 3IN AT THE PROPERTY LINE.       26. AT THE NORTH DRIVEWAY TO S. FLAGLER DRIVE, SHEET   C-500 SHOWS THE PROPERTY LINE AT AN ELEVATION LESS THAN   3.98 FT NAVD. SHEET G-203 SHOWS AN ELEVATION OF 4FT 3IN   AT THE PROPERTY LINE CROSSING THE DRIVEWAY.       TRACY WARD, PE   SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT   561-494-1120 (O)   561-351-0510 (M)   [email protected]     Review Stop STORM STORMWATER Rev No 3 Status F Date 08-19-2021 Cont ID   Sent By tward Date 08-19-2021 Time 13:36 Rev Time 0.00 Received By tward Date 08-19-2021 Time 13:37 Sent To   Notes 2021-08-19 13:37:20 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE   AUGUST 5, 2021 PLAN SUBMITTAL.       1. [CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL] COORDINATE THE   GRADING OF CURRIE CRESCENT WITH THE FLAGLER FORTE   DEVELOPMENT.       2. [CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL] CURRIE CRESCENT   CURB AND GUTTER TO HAVE POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO THE STREET   DRAINAGE SYSTEM.       3. [CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL] MAINTAIN CROWN   CROSS SECTION OF CURRIE CRESCENT.       4. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] REQUESTED DIMENSIONS WERE ONLY   PROVIDE FOR SECTIONS B-B, C-C, D-D, H-H, AND J-J.   PREVIOUS COMMENT: FOR THE CROSS SECTIONS ON SHEET   C-501, PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FROM PROPERTY LINE/RIGHT OF   WAY LINE TO VALLEY GUTTER OR BACK OF SIDEWALK.       5. [SATISFIED] SUGGEST SLOPING THE SIDEWALK PORTION OF   THE DRIVEWAY SHOWN IN SECTION B-B TOWARD THE VALLEY   GUTTER.       6. [NOT SATISFIED] SECTION D-D SHOWS 10% SLOPE EAST OF   THE PROPERTY LINE. SHEET A-101 SHOWS 7.5% RAMP UP.   PREVIOUS COMMENT: COORDINATE THE SLOPES SHOWN FOR THE   DRIVEWAYS WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. FOR EXAMPLE,   SECTION C-C SHOWS 3.4% SLOPE BETWEEN THE BUILDING AND   VALLEY GUTTER. SHEET A-101 SHOWS THE DRIVEWAY AT 7.5%   SLOPE.       7. {SATISFIED] SECTION D-D: PROVIDE SIDEWALK AREA WITH   SLOPE NO STEEPER THAN 2%.       8. [SATISFIED] SECTION E-E: CORRECT LABELS FOR ROAD   CENTERLINE AND PROPERTY LINE.       9. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ? GRADING OF THE AREA BETWEEN   THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE AND THE CENTER LINE OF DIANA   PLACE CAN BE A CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO BE   WORKED OUT DURING ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.] THE   GRADING BETWEEN THE ROAD CENTERLINE AND R/W, AS SHOWN   ON SECTIONS H-H THROUGH K-K NEEDS FURTHER REFINEMENT.   THE ROAD AND PARKING CROSS SLOPES NEED TO MEET THE   CITY?S DESIGN CRITERIA AND BE ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY   TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER. THE LANDSCAPE SLOPES STEEPER   THAN 4:1 ARE DIFFICULT TO MAINTAIN. FOR SECTION J-J,   THE LANDSCAPE AREA SHOULD MEET THE TOP OF CURB. FOR   SECTION K-K, THE ARROW FOR THE 0.1% LANDSCAPE SLOPE IS   POINTING IN THE WRONG DIRECTION. PREVIOUS COMMENT:   SECTION G-G, CONSIDER LOWERING THE COURTYARD AREA   WITHIN THE PROPERTY IN ORDER TO FLATTEN THE SLOPE   BETWEEN THE 10 FT WIDE SIDEWALK AND THE BACK OF CURB OF   DIANA PLACE.       10. [SATISFIED] IT APPEARS THE TOWNHOME AT THE WEST END   OF THE PROJECT WILL HOLD WATER BEHIND THE DIANA PLACE   SIDEWALK.       11. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION FROM THE NORTH   PROPERTY LINE TO THE FACE OF THE BUILDING INCLUDING   DIMENSIONS TO THE OUTSIDE OF THE UNDERGROUND PARKING   GARAGE.       12. [SATISFIED - TO BE WORKED OUT AT ENGINEERING PERMIT   SUBMITTAL] FOR THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH ALONG THE NORTH   PROPERTY LINE, THE SFWMD TRENCH EQUATION WILL HAVE TO   BE MODIFIED TO ACCOUNT FOR THE RETAINING WALL ON ONE   SIDE AND POSSIBLE GARAGE WALL ON THE OTHER THAT WILL   LIMIT THE FLOW OUT OF THE TRENCH.       13. [SATISFIED] EXPLAIN HOW THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH   ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE WILL BE MAINTAINED,   INCLUDING POSSIBLE REPLACEMENT, WHEN IT HAS LOST ITS   DISPOSAL CAPACITY IN A FEW YEARS.       14. [NOT SATISFIED. INFORMATION CAN BE PROVIDED WITH   ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL] PROVIDE AN EXFILTRATION   TRENCH DETAIL, LABELING THE TRENCH WIDTH AND THE   ELEVATIONS FOR THE TOP OF TRENCH, THE BOTTOM OF THE   TRENCH, AND THE PIPE INVERT.       15. [NOT SATISFIED. INFORMATION CAN BE PROVIDED WITH   ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL] PROVIDE DETAIL OF CONTROL   STRUCTURE(S). NOTE BLEEDERS CANNOT BE USED AS PART OF   THE CONTROL TO SURCHARGE THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH.       16. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING   LIMITS ON CURRIE CRESCENT (BECAUSE OF THE TRENCH CUTS   AND THE CHANGE IN PAVEMENT MARKINGS FOR THE PARKING   SPACES). PREVIOUS COMMENT: SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING   LIMITS FOR TRENCH CUTS IN THE ROADWAY PER CITY'S   STANDARD DETAIL GC-8.       17. [SATISFIED] CONVERT EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE IN   THE EXISTING SOUTH DRIVEWAY TO S. FLAGLER DRIVE TO A   CATCH BASIN WITH A HOODED FRAME AND GRATE. THE   STRUCTURE MAY NEED TO BE ENLARGED IN ORDER TO CONNECT   THE PROPOSED 15-INCH RCP FROM THE DEVELOPMENT.       18. [SATISFIED ? TO BE WORKED OUT AT ENGINEERING PERMIT   SUBMITTAL] DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN TO CONSIDER SEA LEVEL   RISE.       19. [SATISFIED ? PIPE WAS REMOVED] WHAT IS THE PURPOSE   OF THE 6-INCH HDPE PIPE BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND EAST   PROPERTY LINE?       20. [SATISFIED ? TO BE ADDRESSED DURING FINAL   ENGINEERING DESIGN] THE ROOF DRAIN SYSTEM WILL NEED TO   BE DESIGNED SO THAT MANHOLE LIDS ARE NOT DISPLACED BY   THE PRESSURE OF THE WATER OR TRAPPED AIR IN THE ROOF   DOWNSPOUTS.       21. [SATISFIED] IT APPEARS THE TOWNHOME AT THE WEST END   OF THE PROJECT WILL HOLD WATER BEHIND THE DIANA PLACE   SIDEWALK.       22. [CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL] WHAT DRAINAGE   MITIGATION (WATER QUALITY AND PEAK FLOW ATTENUATION) IS   PROPOSED FOR THE ADDITIONAL IMPERVIOUS AREA IN THE   DIANA PLACE PARCEL.       TRACY WARD, PE   SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT   561-494-1120 (O)   561-351-0510 (M)   [email protected]     Review Stop STORM STORMWATER Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-27-2021 Cont ID   Sent By tward Date 07-27-2021 Time 16:44 Rev Time 0.00 Received By tward Date 07-27-2021 Time 16:49 Sent To   Notes 2021-07-27 16:45:52 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE JUNE   30 SUBMITTAL.       1. COORDINATE THE GRADING OF CURRIE CRESCENT WITH THE   FLAGLER FORTE DEVELOPMENT.       2. CURRIE CRESCENT CURB AND GUTTER TO HAVE POSITIVE   DRAINAGE TO THE STREET DRAINAGE SYSTEM.       3. MAINTAIN CROWN CROSS SECTION OF CURRIE CRESCENT.       4. FOR THE CROSS SECTIONS ON SHEET C-501, PROVIDE   DIMENSIONS FROM PROPERTY LINE/RIGHT OF WAY LINE TO   VALLEY GUTTER OR BACK OF SIDEWALK.       5. SUGGEST SLOPING THE SIDEWALK PORTION OF THE DRIVEWAY   SHOWN IN SECTION B-B TOWARD THE VALLEY GUTTER.       6. COORDINATE THE SLOPES SHOWN FOR THE DRIVEWAYS WITH   THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. FOR EXAMPLE, SECTION C-C SHOWS   3.4% SLOPE BETWEEN THE BUILDING AND VALLEY GUTTER.   SHEET A-101 SHOWS THE DRIVEWAY AT 7.5% SLOPE.       7. SECTION D-D: PROVIDE SIDEWALK AREA WITH SLOPE NO   STEEPER THAN 2%.       8. SECTION E-E: CORRECT LABELS FOR ROAD CENTERLINE AND   PROPERTY LINE.       9. SECTION G-G, CONSIDER LOWERING THE COURTYARD AREA   WITHIN THE PROPERTY IN ORDER TO FLATTEN THE SLOPE   BETWEEN THE 10 FT WIDE SIDEWALK AND THE BACK OF CURB OF   DIANA PLACE.       10. IT APPEARS THE TOWNHOME AT THE WEST END OF THE   PROJECT WILL HOLD WATER BEHIND THE DIANA PLACE   SIDEWALK.       11. PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION FROM THE NORTH PROPERTY   LINE TO THE FACE OF THE BUILDING INCLUDING DIMENSIONS   TO THE OUTSIDE OF THE UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE.       12. FOR THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH ALONG THE NORTH   PROPERTY LINE, THE SFWMD TRENCH EQUATION WILL HAVE TO   BE MODIFIED TO ACCOUNT FOR THE RETAINING WALL ON ONE   SIDE AND POSSIBLE GARAGE WALL ON THE OTHER THAT WILL   LIMIT THE FLOW OUT OF THE TRENCH.       13. EXPLAIN HOW THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH ALONG THE NORTH   PROPERTY LINE WILL BE MAINTAINED, INCLUDING POSSIBLE   REPLACEMENT, WHEN IT HAS LOST ITS DISPOSAL CAPACITY IN   A FEW YEARS.       14. PROVIDE AN EXFILTRATION TRENCH DETAIL, LABELING THE   TRENCH WIDTH AND THE ELEVATIONS FOR THE TOP OF TRENCH,   THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH, AND THE PIPE INVERT.       15. PROVIDE DETAIL OF CONTROL STRUCTURE(S). NOTE   BLEEDERS CANNOT BE USED AS PART OF THE CONTROL TO   SURCHARGE THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH.       16. SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING LIMITS FOR TRENCH CUTS IN   THE ROADWAY PER CITY'S STANDARD DETAIL GC-8.       17. CONVERT EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE IN THE EXISTING   SOUTH DRIVEWAY TO S. FLAGLER DRIVE TO A CATCH BASIN   WITH A HOODED FRAME AND GRATE. THE STRUCTURE MAY NEED   TO BE ENLARGED IN ORDER TO CONNECT THE PROPOSED 15-INCH   RCP FROM THE DEVELOPMENT.       18. DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN TO CONSIDER SEA LEVEL RISE.       19. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE 6-INCH HDPE PIPE BETWEEN   THE SIDEWALK AND EAST PROPERTY LINE?       20. THE ROOF DRAIN SYSTEM WILL NEED TO BE DESIGNED SO   THAT MANHOLE LIDS ARE NOT DISPLACED BY THE PRESSURE OF   THE WATER OR TRAPPED AIR IN THE ROOF DOWNSPOUTS.       21. IT APPEARS THE TOWNHOME AT THE WEST END OF THE   PROJECT WILL HOLD WATER BEHIND THE DIANA PLACE   SIDEWALK.       22. WHAT DRAINAGE MITIGATION (WATER QUALITY AND PEAK   FLOW ATTENUATION) IS PROPOSED FOR THE ADDITIONAL   IMPERVIOUS AREA IN THE DIANA PLACE PARCEL.       TRACY WARD, PE   SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT   561-494-1120 (O)   561-351-0510 (M)   [email protected]         Review Stop STORM STORMWATER Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-10-2021 Cont ID   Sent By tward Date 06-10-2021 Time 11:28 Rev Time 0.00 Received By tward Date 06-10-2021 Time 11:29 Sent To   Notes 2021-06-10 11:29:08 THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL   DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION   PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE   ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT   APPLICATION PROCESSES.       THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE   PLAN APPROVAL:       1. PROJECT SITE IS WITHIN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA.   DRAFT COASTAL FLOOD ZONE MAPS HAVE BEEN ISSUED BY FEMA   THAT MAY SHOW A HIGHER BASE FLOOD ELEVATION THAN WHAT   IS SHOWN ON THE CURRENT FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS. TWO   FEET OF FREEBOARD ABOVE THE BFE WILL BE REQUIRED FOR   THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION AND ANY   MECHANICAL/ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT.       2. LABEL THE VERTICAL DATUM AND CONVERSION EQUATION TO   NGVD1929 ON ALL CIVIL ENGINEERING SHEETS WITH ELEVATION   INFORMATION.       3. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP   CRITERIA AND CONSIDER SEA LEVEL RISE.       4. MINIMUM 15 INCH DIAMETER RCP PIPE WITHIN THE RIGHT   OF WAY.       5. CURB RAMP AT CORNER OF CURRIE CRESCENT AND S. OLIVE   AVE TO MEET CURRENT ADA CRITERIA.       6. UPDATE FDOT STANDARD INDEX REFERENCES TO FDOT   STANDARD PLAN REFERENCES.       7. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS AT ALL DRIVEWAYS FROM THE   CENTERLINE OF THE ROAD TO 10 FEET WITHIN THE PROPERTY.   PROVIDE CROSS SLOPE INFORMATION FOR EACH CHANGE IN   SLOPE. SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE RIGHT OF WAY LINE.       8. PROVIDE TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS FOR EACH SIDE OF THE   BUILDING FROM THE ROAD CENTERLINE TO THE FACE OF THE   BUILDING. SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY LINE.       9. THE ELEVATION OF THE TRENCH GRATES ACROSS THE   DRIVEWAYS SHOULD NOT BE LOWER THAN THE PERIMETER BERM   ELEVATION.       10. PRBS SHOULD BE USED IN STRUCTURES CONNECTED TO   EXFILTRATION TRENCHES AND ON THE OUTFALL PIPE.       11. SHOW SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT WHERE UTILITIES WILL BE   CONSTRUCTED.       12. IT APPEARS THERE WILL BE PARKING LOCATED BELOW THE   GROUNDWATER TABLE ELEVATION. DESCRIBE HOW THE   GROUNDWATER WILL BE PREVENTED FROM ENTERING THE BELOW   GRADE PARKING AREA.       13. SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.           THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO   ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING   BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.       1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY   BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.       2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED   WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.       3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP BEFORE THE START OF   CONSTRUCTION.       4. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED WITH THE   ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.       TRACY WARD, PE   SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT   561-494-1120 (O)   561-351-0510 (M)   [email protected]     Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING Rev No 2 Status P Date 07-26-2021 Cont ID   Sent By vnoel Date 07-26-2021 Time 07:59 Rev Time 0.00 Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-07-26 08:03:03 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:       1. REPLAT PRIOR TO C.O.   2. AGREEMENT/LEASE FOR SIDEWALK ALONG SOUTH LINE WITHIN   CITY PROPERTY.   3. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR ANY IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN   CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY.   4. ANY REQUIRED UTILITY EASEMENTS. Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-07-2021 Cont ID   Sent By vnoel Date 06-07-2021 Time 08:43 Rev Time   Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-06-07 09:12:19 1. REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED. APPLICATION FOR MINOR   SUBDIVISION IS MADE THROUGH PLANNING.   2. NEED BLOW UP OF METER AREA WITH ELEVATIONS.   3. SIDEWALK ALONG DIANA PLACE AND FLAGLER WILL REQUIRE   MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT.   4. UTILITY EASEMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR METERS AND   POSSIBLY WATER MAIN ALONG OLIVE AVE. Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 5 Status P Date 09-27-2021 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 09-27-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-09-27 21:37:42 NO FURTHER COMMENTS       SATISFIED. APPROVED WITH THE CONDITION OF REVISING   FREIGHT MANAGEMENT PLAN.       TRAFFIC COMMENTS   1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER ONCE RECEIVED.   2) SATISFIED. SECOND PARAGRAPH OF THE TRAFFIC STUDY   SEEMS INCOMPLETE OR MISSING TEXT AT THE END   3) SATISFIED. DRIVEWAY DIAGRAM SHOWCASES AN ACCESS   POINT ON DIANA, DUE TO THAT, THE TRAFFIC STUDY IS   INVALID IN ITS ASSUMPTIONS AND FINDINGS. PLEASE CORRECT   AND REVISE ACCORDING TO THE LATEST SITE PLAN.   4) SATISFIED. PROPERLY DEPICT INBOUND/OUTBOUND VOLUMES   THROUGH EACH OF THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS OR ENTRY POINTS.   AGGREGATE AND SHOWCASE VOLUMES ENTERING/EXITING THE S   FLAGLER AND CURRIE CRESCENT MAIN DRIVEWAYS IN FIGURE 4.   5) SATISFIED. SPECIFY THE FUNCTIONALITY OF EACH   DRIVEWAY (I.E. SERVICE, PUBLIC AND RESIDENTIAL)   6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE TRAFFIC STUDY FROM THE   ONE SUBMITTED TO THE COUNTY, WHERE ALL VEHICULAR   VOLUMES (I.E. RESIDENTIAL) ARE CONSIDERED       SITE COMMENTS   7) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC   CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY, PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND   PARKING STALLS) OF THE PROPERTIES ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE   OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT   8) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE   TRUCK AND SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE   PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES   CLEARLY DEFINED. VEHICULAR MOVEMENTS SHALL BE DEPICTED   FROM OLIVE AVENUE AND THROUGH ALL POTENTIALLY   SERVICEABLE AREAS   9) SATISFIED. PROVIDE SITE PLAN, OR INDICATE THE   SPECIFIC SHEET SHOWCASING: ROAD, SIDEWALK, AND DRIVEWAY   DIMENSIONS. SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS ARE MISSING.   10) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET WIDE   SIDEWALK ALONG PROPERTY FRONTAGE ON OLIVE AVE AND   CURRIE CRESCENT.   11) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 10 FEET SIDEWALK   ALONG FLAGLER DR   12) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE BY WAY OF   PAVEMENT MARKINGS AN EASILY ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY   STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC   ELECTRIFICATION READINESS (CIRCUIT BOX AND ELECTRIC   CONDUIT)   13) SATISFIED. MAXIMUM ALLOWED DRIVEWAY WIDTH IS 25   FEET. THE RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY ON CURRIE CRESCENT DOES   NOT MEET SUCH CRITERIA.   14) SATISFIED. MISSING DETAILS FOR THE SIDEWALK ON THE   SOUTH-WEST CORNER OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT       VALERIO ORICCHIO   CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER   561-494-1092   [email protected]     Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 4 Status P Date 09-01-2021 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 09-01-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-09-01 13:38:58 PASSED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:       PROVIDE THE REVISED FREIGHT/SERVICE VEHICLES MANAGEMENT   PLAN.       TRAFFIC COMMENTS   1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER ONCE RECEIVED.   2) SATISFIED. SECOND PARAGRAPH OF THE TRAFFIC STUDY   SEEMS INCOMPLETE OR MISSING TEXT AT THE END   3) SATISFIED. DRIVEWAY DIAGRAM SHOWCASES AN ACCESS   POINT ON DIANA, DUE TO THAT, THE TRAFFIC STUDY IS   INVALID IN ITS ASSUMPTIONS AND FINDINGS. PLEASE CORRECT   AND REVISE ACCORDING TO THE LATEST SITE PLAN.   4) SATISFIED. PROPERLY DEPICT INBOUND/OUTBOUND VOLUMES   THROUGH EACH OF THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS OR ENTRY POINTS.   AGGREGATE AND SHOWCASE VOLUMES ENTERING/EXITING THE S   FLAGLER AND CURRIE CRESCENT MAIN DRIVEWAYS IN FIGURE 4.   5) SATISFIED. SPECIFY THE FUNCTIONALITY OF EACH   DRIVEWAY (I.E. SERVICE, PUBLIC AND RESIDENTIAL)   6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE TRAFFIC STUDY FROM THE   ONE SUBMITTED TO THE COUNTY, WHERE ALL VEHICULAR   VOLUMES (I.E. RESIDENTIAL) ARE CONSIDERED   SITE COMMENTS   7) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC   CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY, PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND   PARKING STALLS) OF THE PROPERTIES ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE   OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT   8) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE   TRUCK AND SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE   PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES   CLEARLY DEFINED. VEHICULAR MOVEMENTS SHALL BE DEPICTED   FROM OLIVE AVENUE AND THROUGH ALL POTENTIALLY   SERVICEABLE AREAS   9) SATISFIED. PROVIDE SITE PLAN, OR INDICATE THE   SPECIFIC SHEET SHOWCASING: ROAD, SIDEWALK, AND DRIVEWAY   DIMENSIONS. SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS ARE MISSING.   10) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET WIDE   SIDEWALK ALONG PROPERTY FRONTAGE ON OLIVE AVE AND   CURRIE CRESCENT.   11) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 10 FEET SIDEWALK   ALONG FLAGLER DR   12) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE BY WAY OF   PAVEMENT MARKINGS AN EASILY ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY   STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC   ELECTRIFICATION READINESS (CIRCUIT BOX AND ELECTRIC   CONDUIT)   13) SATISFIED. MAXIMUM ALLOWED DRIVEWAY WIDTH IS 25   FEET. THE RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY ON CURRIE CRESCENT DOES   NOT MEET SUCH CRITERIA.   14) SATISFIED. MISSING DETAILS FOR THE SIDEWALK ON THE   SOUTH-WEST CORNER OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT       VALERIO ORICCHIO   CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER   561-494-1092   [email protected]     Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 3 Status F Date 08-19-2021 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 08-19-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-08-19 11:12:33 TRAFFIC COMMENTS   1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER ONCE RECEIVED.   2) SATISFIED. SECOND PARAGRAPH OF THE TRAFFIC STUDY   SEEMS INCOMPLETE OR MISSING TEXT AT THE END   3) SATISFIED. DRIVEWAY DIAGRAM SHOWCASES AN ACCESS   POINT ON DIANA, DUE TO THAT, THE TRAFFIC STUDY IS   INVALID IN ITS ASSUMPTIONS AND FINDINGS. PLEASE CORRECT   AND REVISE ACCORDING TO THE LATEST SITE PLAN.   4) SATISFIED. PROPERLY DEPICT INBOUND/OUTBOUND VOLUMES   THROUGH EACH OF THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS OR ENTRY POINTS.   AGGREGATE AND SHOWCASE VOLUMES ENTERING/EXITING THE S   FLAGLER AND CURRIE CRESCENT MAIN DRIVEWAYS IN FIGURE 4.   5) SATISFIED. SPECIFY THE FUNCTIONALITY OF EACH   DRIVEWAY (I.E. SERVICE, PUBLIC AND RESIDENTIAL)   6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE TRAFFIC STUDY FROM THE   ONE SUBMITTED TO THE COUNTY, WHERE ALL VEHICULAR   VOLUMES (I.E. RESIDENTIAL) ARE CONSIDERED   SITE COMMENTS   7) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC   CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY, PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND   PARKING STALLS) OF THE PROPERTIES ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE   OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT   8) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE   TRUCK AND SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE   PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES   CLEARLY DEFINED. VEHICULAR MOVEMENTS SHALL BE DEPICTED   FROM OLIVE AVENUE AND THROUGH ALL POTENTIALLY   SERVICEABLE AREAS   9) SATISFIED. PROVIDE SITE PLAN, OR INDICATE THE   SPECIFIC SHEET SHOWCASING: ROAD, SIDEWALK, AND DRIVEWAY   DIMENSIONS. SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS ARE MISSING.   10) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET   WIDE SIDEWALK ALONG PROPERTY FRONTAGE ON OLIVE AVE AND   CURRIE CRESCENT.   11) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 10 FEET   SIDEWALK ALONG FLAGLER DR   12) NOT SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE BY WAY OF   PAVEMENT MARKINGS AN EASILY ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY   STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC   ELECTRIFICATION READINESS (CIRCUIT BOX AND ELECTRIC   CONDUIT)   13) NOT SATISFIED. MAXIMUM ALLOWED DRIVEWAY WIDTH IS 25   FEET. THE RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY ON CURRIE CRESCENT DOES   NOT MEET SUCH CRITERIA.   14) NOT SATISFIED. MISSING DETAILS FOR THE SIDEWALK ON   THE SOUTH-WEST CORNER OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT       VALERIO ORICCHIO   CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER   561-494-1092   [email protected]         Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-16-2021 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 07-16-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-07-16 21:32:33 TRAFFIC COMMENTS   1) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER ONCE   RECEIVED.   2) SATISFIED. SECOND PARAGRAPH OF THE TRAFFIC STUDY   SEEMS INCOMPLETE OR MISSING TEXT AT THE END   3) SATISFIED. DRIVEWAY DIAGRAM SHOWCASES AN ACCESS   POINT ON DIANA, DUE TO THAT, THE TRAFFIC STUDY IS   INVALID IN ITS ASSUMPTIONS AND FINDINGS. PLEASE CORRECT   AND REVISE ACCORDING TO THE LATEST SITE PLAN.   4) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROPERLY DEPICT   INBOUND/OUTBOUND VOLUMES THROUGH EACH OF THE PROPOSED   DRIVEWAYS OR ENTRY POINTS. AGGREGATE AND SHOWCASE   VOLUMES ENTERING/EXITING THE S FLAGLER AND CURRIE   CRESCENT MAIN DRIVEWAYS IN FIGURE 4.   5) SATISFIED. SPECIFY THE FUNCTIONALITY OF EACH   DRIVEWAY (I.E. SERVICE, PUBLIC AND RESIDENTIAL)   6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE TRAFFIC STUDY FROM THE   ONE SUBMITTED TO THE COUNTY, WHERE ALL VEHICULAR   VOLUMES (I.E. RESIDENTIAL) ARE CONSIDERED       SITE COMMENTS   7) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC   CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY, PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND   PARKING STALLS) OF THE PROPERTIES ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE   OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT   8) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE   TRUCK AND SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE   PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES   CLEARLY DEFINED. VEHICULAR MOVEMENTS SHALL BE DEPICTED   FROM OLIVE AVENUE AND THROUGH ALL POTENTIALLY   SERVICEABLE AREAS   9) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE SITE PLAN, OR INDICATE   THE SPECIFIC SHEET SHOWCASING: ROAD, SIDEWALK, AND   DRIVEWAY DIMENSIONS. SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS ARE MISSING.   10) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET WIDE   SIDEWALK ALONG PROPERTY FRONTAGE ON OLIVE AVE AND   CURRIE CRESCENT           VALERIO ORICCHIO   CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER   561-494-1092   [email protected]     Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-10-2021 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 06-10-2021 Time   Rev Time   Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-06-10 12:06:35 TRAFFIC COMMENTS   1) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER   2) SECOND PARAGRAPH OF THE TRAFFIC STUDY SEEMS   INCOMPLETE OR MISSING TEXT AT THE END   3) DRIVEWAY DIAGRAM SHOWCASES AN ACCESS POINT ON DIANA,   DUE TO THAT, THE TRAFFIC STUDY IS INVALID IN ITS   ASSUMPTIONS AND FINDINGS. PLEASE CORRECT AND REVISE   ACCORDING TO THE LATEST SITE PLAN   4) PROPERLY DEPICT INBOUND/OUTBOUND VOLUMES THROUGH   EACH OF THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS OR ENTRY POINTS   5) SPECIFY THE FUNCTIONALITY OF EACH DRIVEWAY (I.E.   SERVICE, PUBLIC AND RESIDENTIAL)   6) PROVIDE A SEPARATE TRAFFIC STUDY FROM THE ONE   SUBMITTED TO THE COUNTY, WHERE ALL VEHICULAR VOLUMES   (I.E. RESIDENTIAL) ARE CONSIDERED       SITE COMMENTS   7) ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS   (I.E. DRIVEWAY, PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND PARKING STALLS)   OF THE PROPERTIES ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS   SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT   8) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND   SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED   DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES CLEARLY   DEFINED. VEHICULAR MOVEMENTS SHALL BE DEPICTED FROM   OLIVE AVENUE AND THROUGH ALL POTENTIALLY SERVICEABLE   AREAS   9) PROVIDE SITE PLAN, OR INDICATE THE SPECIFIC SHEET   SHOWCASING: ROAD, SIDEWALK AND DRIVEWAY DIMENSIONS       VALERIO ORICCHIO   CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER   561-494-1092   [email protected]     Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 5 Status P Date 09-28-2021 Cont ID   Sent By eschneid Date 09-28-2021 Time 08:34 Rev Time 2.00 Received By eschneid Date 09-27-2021 Time 09:48 Sent To   Notes 2021-09-28 08:37:04 CASE NO. PB 1857B 9/13/21 RESUBMITTAL   FLAGLER TOWERS   1315 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE       - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,   [email protected]       - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED   IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION   94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT   REGULATIONS.       1) IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 166.033 OF THE FLORIDA   STATUTES, YOU ARE NOT REQUIRED TO PROVIDE THE FAA   APPROVAL LETTER PRIOR TO PROCEEDING TO THE PLANNING   BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION UNLESS THE FAA ISSUES A FINAL   AGENCY ACTION OF DENIAL. PLEASE BE AWARE THAT THE   DEVELOPMENT ORDER WILL INCLUDE A PROVISION THAT THE FAA   APPROVAL WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ISSUING A BUILDING   PERMIT FOR WHATEVER HEIGHT THE FINAL BUILDING IS   APPROVED AT.       2) STAFF WILL NOT SUPPORT THE BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 300   FEET IN HEIGHT.       3) ROBERT BROWN, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL, MUST APPROVE   THE FFE OF 9. PLEASE REVIEW HIS COMMENTS WHEN THEY ARE   POSTED.       4) ROBERT BROWN, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL, MUST APPROVE   THAT THE NEW CONNECTION TO THE DIANA PLACE CROSSWALK   PROVIDES AN ADA COMPLIANT ROUTE TO AVOID THE STEPS.   PLEASE REVIEW HIS COMMENTS WHEN THEY ARE POSTED.       PARKING       5) CONDITION: TWO BICYCLE PARKING SPACES WERE REMOVED   FROM THE CAFE AREA (8 TO 6). THIS REQUIRES AN UPDATE TO   THE "PROPOSED" LINE OF THE BICYCLE PARKING TABLE. THE   SITE MEETS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED; HOWEVER, THE TABLE   WILL NEED TO BE CORRECTED PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE CASE   BEFORE THE CITY COMMISSION.       DEVELOPMENT REGULATION: FPL EASEMENT WHICH BISECTS THE   PROPOSED BUILDING LOCATION WILL NEED TO BE RELEASED BY   FPL AND ALL OVERHEAD LINES MUST BE REMOVED. ANY NEW   UTILITY LINES MUST BE RELOCATED UNDERGROUND.       DEVELOPMENT REGULATION: THE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE CITY   OWNED PARCEL SOUTH OF THE PROPERTY, INCLUDING THE   SIDEWALK, WALKWAYS AND LANDSCAPE, WILL BE THE   MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE FLAGLER TOWERS   PROJECT. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS AND EASEMENTS WILL BE   REQUIRED.       DEVELOPMENT REGULATION: EVERY UNIT OWNER SHALL HAVE AT   LEAST ONE EV EQUIPPED PARKING SPACE.       DEVELOPMENT REGULATION: THERE WILL BE A DEVELOPMENT   REGULATION REFERENCING THE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN THAT   WAS APPROVED BY THE CITY'S TRAFFIC ENGINEER.         Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 4 Status F Date 09-01-2021 Cont ID   Sent By eschneid Date 09-01-2021 Time 17:07 Rev Time 6.00 Received By eschneid Date 09-01-2021 Time 17:04 Sent To   Notes 2021-09-01 17:06:05 CASE NO. PB 1857B - 3RD RESUBMITTAL REVIEW 9/1/21   FLAGLER TOWERS   1315 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE       - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,   [email protected]       - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN   WRITTEN FORMAT.       - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE   (3) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT   OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE   RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS   TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL   COMMENTS.       - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT   RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM   THE DATE OF ISSUANCE (BY NOVEMBER 1, 2021), THE   PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT THAT THE   CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL   REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.       - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ON ADDITIONAL   SUBMITTAL. IF COMMENTS ARE NOT ADDRESSED YOU WILL BE   ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE IS 20% OF THE   ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).       - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED   IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION   94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT   REGULATIONS.       1) REPEAT COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE FAA   APPLICATION NUMBERS. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT THE FAA   APPROVAL FOR THE PROPOSED TOWER PRIOR TO SCHEDULING   THIS CASE FOR PLANNING BOARD.       2) REPEAT COMMENT: STAFF WILL NOT SUPPORT THE BUILDING   IN EXCESS OF 300 FEET IN HEIGHT. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU   ARE WELCOME TO PROCEED THROUGH THE PUBLIC HEARING   PROCESS TO CITY COMMISSION; HOWEVER, STAFF WILL BE   RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF THE REQUEST AS CURRENTLY   PROPOSED. THE LATEST ROUND OF RESPONSES INCLUDES ITEMS   WHICH MUST BE PROVIDED AND CORRECTED PRIOR TO BEING   SCHEDULED FOR PLANNING BOARD, REGARDLESS OF THE   BUILDING DESIGN (EXAMPLE: PARKING LOT CORRECTIONS).       BUILDING PLACEMENT       3) UPDATED COMMENT: SHEET G-201 WAS UPDATED TO SHOW THE   BUILDING 15 FEET FROM THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE. THE   CIVIL PLAN CROSS SECTIONS H (14.6 FEET) AND I (14.8)   SHOW THE BUILDING CLOSER THAN 15 FEET FROM THE PROPERTY   LINE. ALL PLANS NEED TO SHOW THE SAME CONDITION WITH A   MINIMUM 15-FOOT SETBACK.       4) CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE LATEST SIDEWALK AND   LANDSCAPE CONFIGURATION ALONG DIANA PLACE.       A. UPDATED COMMENT: THE WESTERNMOST TOWNHOUSES, WITH AN   FFE OF 9 FEET ARE BELOW THE ROADWAY ELEVATION, WHICH IS   A PROBLEM. THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING INFORMATION ON HOW   YOU PLAN TO ACCOMPLISH THE DRAINAGE FOR THESE UNITS.   THIS NEEDS TO BE APPROVED BY ROBERT BROWN, CHIEF   BUILDING OFFICIAL. PLEASE NOTE THAT IT HAS COME TO THE   PLANNING STAFF'S ATTENTION THAT THE FIMA FLOOD ZONE   MAPS SHOW THAT YOUR FFE NEEDS TO BE SET AT 10, NOT 9   FEET. WHILE THE CITY IS CURRENTLY APPEALING THIS   DESIGNATION; IF THE APPEAL IS NOT GRANTED, YOU WILL   NEED TO REVISE YOUR FINISHED FLOOR LEVEL.       B. UPDATED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR RELOCATING THE   SIDEWALK CLOSER TO THE TOWNHOUSES AND FLATTENING OUT   THE EXTREME GRADE ISSUES THAT PREVIOUSLY OCCURRED. THE   STAIRS THAT YOU HAVE USED TO OFFSET THIS GRADE   DIFFERENTIAL FOR THE WALKWAYS FROM THE SIDEWALK TO THE   UNITS MAY NOT OCCUR ON THE CITY PROPERTY BUT MUST   RATHER OCCUR ON YOUR PRIVATE PROPERTY. AS DISCUSSED ON   THE CALL, FOR WALK-UP UNITS, THIS TYPICALLY OCCURS AT   THE ENTRY TO THE BUILDING. PLEASE NOTE THAT PRELIMINARY   DISCUSSIONS THAT PLANNING STAFF HAD WITH BUILDING STAFF   VERIFIED THAT SHOULD THESE STAIRS BE WITHIN THE CITY   PROPERTY THEY WOULD BE REQUIRED TO HAVE HANDRAILS,   WHICH IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE SITUATION.       C. THE PROPOSED EAST/WEST SIDEWALK NOW SHOWS STEPS AT   THE WESTERN END TO OFFSET THE GRADE DIFFERENTIAL, WHICH   IS NOT ADA COMPLIANT. NO INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED TO   VERIFY THAT THE NEW CONNECTION TO THE DIANA PLACE   CROSSWALK PROVIDES AN ADA COMPLIANT ROUTE TO AVOID THE   STEPS. THIS NEW CONFIGURATION REQUIRES APPROVAL BY   ROBERT BROWN, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL.       PARKING       5) UPDATED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE BICYCLE   PARKING CLOSER TO A GUEST ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE TO THE   BUILDING. THE LOCATION APPEARS TO REQUIRE THAT USERS   WOULD NEED TO WALK THEIR BICYCLES THROUGH THE CAFE   SEATING AREA, WHICH IS NOT IDEAL FOR EITHER THE CAFE   OPERATION OR THE BICYCLE PARKER. PROVIDE A DIRECT PAVED   CONNECTION FROM THE FRONT OF THE RACKS TO THE PUBLIC   SIDEWALK SO THAT THE CONFLICT IS MINIMIZE (SEE E-MAILED   ADDENDUM). THIS WILL ALSO ALLOW GUESTS A ROUTE TO THE   BUILDING ENTRANCE THAT DOES NOT REQUIRE THEM TO WALK   THROUGH THE CAFE SEATING AREA.       LANDSCAPE       6) THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ONLY   PERMIT HEDGES WITHIN A SETBACK TO BE A MAXIMUM HEIGHT   OF 10 FEET. THE RESUBMITTED PLANS CALL OUT THE   PODOCARPUS ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE TO BE GROWN TO   A HEIGHT OF 12 FEET TO ARCH OVER THE GATES. IS THIS   PROPOSED TO BE THE OVERALL HEIGHT OF THE ARCH OR THE   UNDERSIDE OF THE ARCH? YOU HAVE STATED THAT THERE WILL   BE COLUMNS FOR THE GATES. THIS WOULD FORCE THE HEDGES   WIDER FROM THE ENTRYWAY AND THUS CREATE A LARGE VISUAL   OBSTRUCTION FOR PEDESTRIANS ALONG THE NEW DIANA PLACE   WALKWAY. IF YOU CHOOSE TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THIS   CONFIGURATION, AN ADDITIONAL WAIVER MUST BE REQUESTED,   BUT STAFF WILL NOT SUPPORT IT.       7) UPDATED COMMENT: THE TWO NEW TREES PROVIDED ADJACENT   TO THE CANOPY AT THE SOUTH ENTRANCE ARE SHOWN PLANTED   IN PAVEMENT, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED. THE PLANTING AREA   NEEDS TO BE SHOWN AS APPROPRIATE FOR A 200-GALLON ROOT   BALL. WHILE ALL SHOWING THAT THE TREES WILL BE PLANTED   IN PAVEMENT, THE CIVIL, SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS DO NOT   SHOW THE SAME PAVEMENT CONDITIONS IN THIS AREA.       8) SOME OF THE TREES ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE   BUILDING ARE SHOWN PLANTED IN PAVEMENT, WHICH IS NOT   PERMITTED. THE CIVIL, LANDSCAPE AND SITE PLANS ALL SHOW   THE CONSISTENT PAVEMENT CONDITION.       DEVELOPMENT REGULATION: FPL EASEMENT WHICH BISECTS THE   PROPOSED BUILDING LOCATION WILL NEED TO BE RELEASED BY   FPL AND ALL OVERHEAD LINES MUST BE REMOVED. ANY NEW   UTILITY LINES MUST BE RELOCATED UNDERGROUND.       DEVELOPMENT REGULATION: THE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE CITY   OWNED PARCEL SOUTH OF THE PROPERTY, INCLUDING THE   SIDEWALK, WALKWAYS AND LANDSCAPE, WILL BE THE   MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE FLAGLER TOWERS   PROJECT. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS AND EASEMENTS WILL BE   REQUIRED.       DEVELOPMENT REGULATION: EVERY UNIT OWNER SHALL HAVE AT   LEAST ONE EV EQUIPPED PARKING SPACE.         Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 3 Status F Date 08-19-2021 Cont ID   Sent By eschneid Date 08-19-2021 Time 12:19 Rev Time 8.00 Received By eschneid Date 08-18-2021 Time 09:46 Sent To   Notes 2021-08-19 12:16:46 CASE NO. PB 1857B - 2ND RESUBMITTAL REVIEW 8/19/21   FLAGLER TOWERS   1315 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE       - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,   [email protected]       - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN   WRITTEN FORMAT.       - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE   (3) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT   OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE   RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS   TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL   COMMENTS.       - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT   RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM   THE DATE OF ISSUANCE (BY OCTOBER 19, 2021), THE   PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT THAT THE   CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL   REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.       - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ON ADDITIONAL   SUBMITTAL. IF COMMENTS ARE NOT ADDRESSED YOU WILL BE   ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE IS 20% OF THE   ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).       - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED   IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION   94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT   REGULATIONS.       1) UPDATED COMMENT: THE CITY OWNED PARCEL SOUTH OF THE   PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO A DEED RESTRICTION. IN ORDER TO   ENSURE THAT THE PROPOSED CHANGES DO NOT IMPACT THE DEED   RESTRICTION, PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE APPLICATION FOR   THE PLANNING BOARD MEETING, YOU MUST PROVIDE WRITTEN   CONSENT/NO OBJECTION FROM THE LAKE WORTH PIONEERS   ASSOCIATION TO THE CITY.       2) REPEAT COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE FAA   APPLICATION NUMBERS. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT THE FAA   APPROVAL FOR THE PROPOSED TOWER PRIOR TO SCHEDULING   THIS CASE FOR PLANNING BOARD.       3) REPEAT COMMENT: STAFF WILL NOT SUPPORT THE BUILDING   IN EXCESS OF 300 FEET IN HEIGHT. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU   ARE WELCOME TO PROCEED THROUGH THE PUBLIC HEARING   PROCESS TO CITY COMMISSION; HOWEVER, STAFF WILL BE   RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF THE REQUEST AS CURRENTLY   PROPOSED. THE LATEST ROUND OF RESPONSES INCLUDES ITEMS   WHICH MUST BE PROVIDED AND CORRECTED PRIOR TO BEING   SCHEDULED FOR PLANNING BOARD, REGARDLESS OF THE   BUILDING DESIGN (EXAMPLE: PARKING LOT CORRECTIONS).       BUILDING PLACEMENT       4) THERE IS A DIMENSION TAG ON SHEET G-201 THAT NOW   SHOWS A 14-FOOT 8-INCH SETBACK ALONG DIANA PLACE. THE   BUILDING MAY NOT BE CLOSER THAN 15 FEET TO THE PROPERTY   LINE.       5) CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE LATEST SIDEWALK AND   LANDSCAPE CONFIGURATION ALONG DIANA PLACE. THANK YOU   FOR SHOWING THE PARALLEL PARKING CONFIGURATION.   A. THE SIDEWALK NEEDS TO BE MOVED CLOSER TO THE   TOWNHOUSES TO PROVIDE FOR A LARGER LANDSCAPE AREA ALONG   THE CURB TO PROVIDE A LARGER AREA FOR ROOT GROWTH AS   WELL AS TO MOVE THE TREES FURTHER AWAY FROM THE DOOR   SWING.   B. THE WESTERNMOST TOWNHOUSES, WITH A FFE OF 9 FEET ARE   BELOW THE ROADWAY ELEVATION, WHICH IS A PROBLEM.   C. SOME OF THE GRADE CHANGE BETWEEN THE TOWNHOUSE   COURTYARDS BEING SET AT CLOSE TO THE 9-FOOT FFE AND THE   ROADWAY ARE VERY STEEP. IT MAY BE BEST TO HAVE STEPS   DOWN FROM THE TOWNHOUSES TO A LOWER COURTYARD IN ORDER   TO MAKE UP THE GRADE CHANGE, SIMILAR TO HOW THE FLAGLER   TERRACE AND DOG PARK ARE HANDLED.       6) AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE, IS IT POSSIBLE   TO CONNECT THE EXISTING CROSSWALK DIRECTLY TO THE NEW   EAST/WEST SIDEWALK? IS THE STEEP SWALE NECESSARY?       7) UPDATED COMMENT: THE TWO NEW TREES PROVIDED ADJACENT   TO THE CANOPY AT THE SOUTH ENTRANCE, INCLUDING SPECIES   AND SIZE, ARE NOT SHOWN ON SHEET LG-3.1. SINCE THESE   TREES ARE SHOWN ON THE SITE, THEY ARE NOT TO BE   INCLUDED ON SHEET LG-3.2, THE DIANA ROAD IMPROVEMENTS.   STAFF IS UNABLE TO VERIFY THAT THE 10-FOOT DEPTH WILL   NOT INTERFERE THE TREES, NOR IF THE SPECIES IS   APPROPRIATE FOR THE AREA IN WHICH THEY ARE INSTALLED.       8) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE HEIGHTS OF THE CAFE   AWNINGS FROM GRADE.       ELEVATIONS       9) REPEAT COMMENT: THE EAST ELEVATION AT THE PARK IS   NOT ACCURATE. THE GREEN WALL SHOWN ON THE ELEVATION   DOES NOT HAVE THE STEPS UP TO THE TERRACE ACCURATELY   SHOWN. ADDITIONALLY, STAFF IS UNABLE TO MATCH UP HOW IT   ALIGNS WITH THE SITE PLAN. THE ELEVATION MAKES THIS   WALL APPEAR TO BE CURVING, YET THIS IS NOT REFLECTED ON   THE PLANS.       PARKING       10) REPEAT COMMENT: THE ADA PARKING SPACE DETAIL   (ACCESSIBLE AND VAN ACCESSIBLE) ON SHEET A-054 DO NOT   CONFORM TO CITY STRIPING STANDARDS. THE CITY STANDARD   DETAIL HAS BEEN SENT TO TYLER WOOLSEY. THE CITY   REQUIRES 16 INCHES BETWEEN STALL DEMARCATION LINES FOR   ALL SPACES.       11) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS FOR THE   BICYCLE RACK PAD ALONG SOUTH OLIVE. THE DEPTH MUST BE   AT LEAST SIX FEET AND THE WIDTH IS BASED ON THE NUMBER   OF RACK ELEMENTS. THE DIMENSIONS NEED TO BE SHOWN ON A   PLAN (SITE, CIVIL, OR HARDSCAPE) AND THE DETAIL FOR THE   SPECIFIC ALIGNMENT NEEDS TO BE ON A DETAIL SHEET. THE   GENERIC DETAIL IS NOT SUFFICIENT. NOTE: THE BICYCLE   PARKING AT THE CAFE IS NOT SHOWN ON THE HARDSCAPE PLAN.       12) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE DETAILS OF THE BICYCLE   RACKS THAT WILL BE USED WITHIN THE BICYCLE STORAGE   ROOMS. THE BICYCLE STORAGE ROOMS MUST SHOW THE ACCURATE   RACKS AND THE DIMENSIONS REQUIRED BASED ON THE TYPE OF   RACKS.       13) REPEAT COMMENT: YOU MUST HAVE BICYCLE PARKING FOR   GUESTS (VISITORS) NEAR ONE OF THE GUEST ACCESSIBLE   ENTRANCES TO THE BUILDING. THE BICYCLE RACK BY THE CAFE   IS NOT NEAR AN ENTRANCE TO THE RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF   THE BUILDING THAT A GUEST CAN USE. IDENTIFY THE   ENTRANCE(S) THAT ARE GUEST ACCESSIBLE AND PROVIDE AT   LEAST ONE BICYCLE RACK, WITH PAD DIMENSIONS, ADJACENT   TO THAT ENTRANCE. THE PLANS DO NOT INDICATE WHICH   ENTRANCES ARE GUEST ACCESSIBLE.       14) THERE ARE ONLY 108, NOT 109 RESIDENTIAL EV SPACES   SHOWN. THERE IS TO BE ONE PER DWELLING UNIT.       15) THE GOAL IS TO ENSURE THAT EVERY UNIT OWNER HAS EV   CAPABILITY. WHILE YOU HAVE SHOWN 108 (SHORT 1)   RESIDENTIAL EV STATIONS, HOW WILL YOU ENSURE THAT   PARKING IS ASSIGNED SO THAT EACH UNIT GETS AN EV   RECEPTACLE? IT WOULD SEEM STRANGE THAT IF A UNIT OWNER   HAS TWO SPACES, THEY WOULD BE ON DIFFERENT FLOORS,   WHICH WOULD NEED TO BE THE CASE SINCE SHEET A-100 SHOWS   NO SPACES FOR RESIDENTIAL EV.       LOADING/ACCESS       16) REPEAT COMMENT: THE CITY'S ENGINEERING SERVICES   DEPARTMENT NEEDS TO APPROVE THE USE OF CURRIE CRESCENT   FOR MANEUVERING PRIOR TO THE CASE PROCEEDING THROUGH   THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS. CALL TO DISCUSS IS   SCHEDULED.       17) REPEAT COMMENT: THE CITY'S ENGINEERING SERVICES   DEPARTMENT NEEDS TO APPROVE THE NUMBER OF ACCESS POINTS   TO CURRIE CRESCENT AND THE SEPARATION OF ACCESS POINTS   TO THE CASE PROCEEDING THROUGH THE PUBLIC HEARING   PROCESS. CALL TO DISCUSS IS SCHEDULED.       WALLS       18) UPDATED COMMENT: THE PLANS SHOW A FENCE ALONG DIANA   PLACE AT THE TOWNHOUSE COURTYARDS.   A. NO DETAILS ON THE MATERIAL OF THE CONCEALED FENCE   WERE PROVIDED.   B. THE MAXIMUM 5-FOOT HEIGHT OF THE DECORATIVE METAL,   PICKET GATE IS NOT STATED ON THE PLANS.       19) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PLANS DO NOT CALL OUT WHAT   HEDGE MATERIAL WILL SCREEN THE 4-FOOT-TALL FENCE. THE   RESPONSE STATES THAT THE MATERIAL WILL BE A PODOCARPUS   HEDGE; HOWEVER, NO TAGS ON SHEET LG-3.1 DO NOT POINT TO   THE HEDGE OR ANY FEATURE WITH HE SAME HATCHING PATTERN   AS THE HEDGE. SHEET G-201 NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED TO   STATE MAXIMUM 5-FOOT HEDGE ALONG THE SOUTH COURTYARDS.       LANDSCAPE       20) REPEAT COMMENT: SHEET LG-3.1 SHOWS PLANTING BEDS   AGAINST THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING WHICH ARE NOT   REFLECTED ON THE CIVIL SHEETS OR SITE PLAN. ALL PLANS   MUST SHOW THE SAME, ACCURATE CONDITIONS.       DEVELOPMENT REGULATION: FPL EASEMENT WHICH BISECTS THE   PROPOSED BUILDING LOCATION WILL NEED TO BE RELEASED BY   FPL AND ALL OVERHEAD LINES MUST BE REMOVED. ANY NEW   UTILITY LINES MUST BE RELOCATED UNDERGROUND.       DEVELOPMENT REGULATION: THE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE CITY   OWNED PARCEL SOUTH OF THE PROPERTY, INCLUDING THE   SIDEWALK, WALKWAYS AND LANDSCAPE, WILL BE THE   MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE FLAGLER TOWERS   PROJECT. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS AND EASEMENTS WILL BE   REQUIRED.     Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-26-2021 Cont ID   Sent By eschneid Date 07-26-2021 Time 17:13 Rev Time 8.00 Received By eschneid Date 07-20-2021 Time 08:45 Sent To   Notes 2021-07-26 17:14:29 CASE NO. PB 1857B -1ST RESUBMITTAL REVIEW   FLAGLER TOWERS   1315 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE       - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,   [email protected]       - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN   WRITTEN FORMAT.       - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE   (3) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT   OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE   RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS   TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL   COMMENTS.       - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND   SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY,   JULY 30, 2021, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE   SEPTEMBER 21, 2021 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.       - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT   RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM   THE DATE OF ISSUANCE (BY AUGUST 10, 2021), THE PLANNING   DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT THAT THE CASE IS   CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE   A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.       - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL   FEE. SUCH FEE IS 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE   ($600).       - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED   IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION   94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT   REGULATIONS.       1) REPEAT COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE TRAFFIC   STUDY THAT STATES THAT THE PROJECT DOES NOT GENERATE A   SIGNIFICANT IMPACT. HOWEVER, YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO   PROVIDE A PALM BEACH COUNTY TPS APPROVAL LETTER.       2) UPDATED COMMENT: STAFF DOES NOT OBJECT TO THE   PROPOSED SIDEWALK AND WALKWAYS TO THE TOWNHOUSE UNITS   BEING INSTALLED AND THE TREES BEING REPLACED ON THE   CITY OWNED PARCEL SOUTH OF THE PROJECT. THE PARCEL IS   SUBJECT TO A DEED RESTRICTION. IN ORDER TO ENSURE THAT   THE PROPOSED CHANGES DO NOT IMPACT THE DEED   RESTRICTION, PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE APPLICATION FOR   THE PLANNING BOARD MEETING, YOU MUST PROVIDE WRITTEN   CONSENT/NO OBJECTION FROM THE LAKE WORTH PIONEERS   ASSOCIATION AND THE NORTON GALLERY AND SCHOOL OF ART,   INC., TO THE CITY.       3) REPEAT COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE FAA   APPLICATION NUMBERS. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT THE FAA   APPROVAL FOR THE PROPOSED TOWER PRIOR TO SCHEDULING   THIS CASE FOR PLANNING BOARD.       4) REPEAT COMMENT: STAFF WILL NOT SUPPORT THE BUILDING   IN EXCESS OF 300 FEET IN HEIGHT. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU   ARE WELCOME TO PROCEED THROUGH THE PUBLIC HEARING   PROCESS TO CITY COMMISSION; HOWEVER, STAFF WILL BE   RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF THE REQUEST AS CURRENTLY   PROPOSED. THE LATEST ROUND OF RESPONSES INCLUDES ITEMS   WHICH MUST BE PROVIDED AND CORRECTED PRIOR TO BEING   SCHEDULED FOR PLANNING BOARD, REGARDLESS OF THE   BUILDING DESIGN (EXAMPLE: PARKING LOT CORRECTIONS).       BUILDING PLACEMENT       5) STAFF HAS REASSESSED THE MEASURE POINTS TO DETERMINE   BASIS FOR THE NORTHERN SETBACK WAIVERS. LEVEL WILL BE   15 FEET, LEVELS 2 THROUGH 4 (PODIUM) WILL BE 41 FEET   AND THE NORTHERN TOWER WILL BE 41 FEET.       6) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE TWO CROSS SECTIONS EAST   OF THE RESIDENT ENTRANCE ALONG DIANA PLACE. PLEASE   PROVIDE ONE THAT INCLUDES THE ANGLED PARKING SPACES AND   ONE THAT INCLUDES THE EASTERNMOST TOWNHOUSE SO THAT   STAFF CAN SEE WHAT THE IMPACT OF CHANGING THE GRADE HAS   AT THESE TWO LOCATIONS.       7) STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE RESPONSE TO THE COMMENT   REGARDING PUSHING THE SOUTHERN TOWER BACK FROM THE   FACADE OF THE PODIUM. PROVIDE A CONTEXT ELEVATION FROM   SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE FACING EAST WHICH SHOWS HOW THE   PROPOSED BUILDING INTERACTS WITH THE PARK AND THE   NORTON MUSEUM. STAFF HAS INCLUDED THE VIEWPOINT IN THE   COMMENT ADDENDUM SENT AS A SEPARATE FILE.       8) UPDATED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR CLARIFYING THAT THE   FIVE (5) FOOT BALCONY ENCROACHMENT IS ONLY ON LEVEL 26   AND 27. THIS WILL BE THE SPECIFIC WAIVER. STAFF WILL   NOT SUPPORT A BLANKET WAIVER FOR ALL THE BALCONIES ON   THE SOUTH FA?ADE TO EXTEND FIVE (5) FEET FROM THE   BUILDING SINCE THIS IS NOT HOW THE DRAWINGS ARE BEING   PRESENTED. THE WEST COLOR ELEVATION FAILS TO SHOW THE   BALCONY. THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS MUST MATCH THE FLOOR   PLANS.       9) PROVIDE THE DEPTH OF THE TERRACE ON THE SOUTH SIDE   OF THE TOWER ON LEVEL 10. THIS TERRACE ENCROACHES   FURTHER INTO THE SOUTHERN SETBACK THAN THE OTHER   TERRACES FOR WHICH DIMENSIONS WERE PROVIDED.       10) PROVIDE THE DEPTH OF THE TRELLIS FEATURES THAT   OVERHANG THE BUILDING EDGES.       11) UPDATED COMMENT: EVEN THOUGH THE CANOPY AT THE   SOUTH ENTRANCE WAS REDUCED IN SIZE, IT STILL INTERFERES   WITH THE SPECIMEN OAK TREE THAT IS BEING PROPOSED AT   THIS LOCATION. THE 10-FOOT DEPTH WILL INTERFERE WITH   ANY TREE INSTALLED AS SHOWN.       12) PROVIDE THE HEIGHTS OF THE CANOPIES AND AWNINGS   FROM GRADE.       13) REPEAT COMMENT: THE SITE OPEN SPACE IS INCORRECTLY   CALCULATED. THE AREAS SUCH AS THE MOTOR COURT AND THE   DRIVE WHERE IT IS ABOVE THE FIRST LEVEL OF THE BUILDING   IS NOT OPEN SPACE IT IS THE BUILDING ROOF OF THE   FIRST-FLOOR PARKING.       14) WHAT DOES THE 3-FOOT SETBACK ENCROACHMENT NOTE AT   THE FLAGLER DRIVE DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE REFER TOO?       15) WHAT OCCURS IN THE ROOM BEHIND THE TERRACE TO THE   WEST OF THE FLAGLER DRIVE RESIDENT PARK? IS THERE AN   OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE THIS AS A ROOM THAT RESIDENTS CAN   USE TO ENTERTAIN AS IT OVERLOOKS THE TERRACE AND THE   PARK? IS THERE AN OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE WINDOWS? SEE   ADDENDUM FOR LOCATION.       16) THE SIDEWALK ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE WHERE IT MEETS   FORTE MUST BE THE SAME WIDTH AS THE SIDEWALK THAT FORTE   IS INSTALLING, NOT FIVE FEET AS PROPOSED. THIS NEEDS TO   BE CLEARLY SHOWN ON THE PLANS.       17) EXPLAIN THE ENTRANCES TO THE TOWNHOUSES. ONE UNIT   APPEARS TO HAVE TWO MAIN ENTRANCES AND OTHERS SEEM TO   HAVE THE INTERNAL WALKWAYS THAT CROSS BETWEEN UNIT   COURTYARDS. PROVIDE ACCURATE CONFIGURATIONS. SEE   ADDENDUM FOR LOCATION.       ELEVATIONS       18) PROVIDE THE ELEVATION DIMENSION LINES ON THE ACTUAL   ELEVATION DRAWINGS. THE STACKING DIAGRAM DOES NOT   PROVIDE THE DETAILS THAT ARE SHOWN ON THE ELEVATIONS.       19) THE EAST ELEVATION AT THE PARK IS NOT ACCURATE. THE   PARKING RAMP NOT SHOWN, AND THE DOORS AND WALLS DO NOT   SEEM ACCURATE WHEN COMPARED TO THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE   PLANS.       PARKING       20) THE PROJECT NOW CONTAINS EXCESS PARKING SPACES;   HOWEVER, STAFF REQUIRES A BETTER DESCRIPTION OF HOW THE   SPACES IN EACH GARAGE WILL BE ACCESSED AND WHO HAS   ACCESS TO THE SPACES (VALET VS. SELF-PARK). UNTIL STAFF   HAS A FULL UNDERSTANDING OF HOW THE PARKING WILL   FUNCTION, WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN ANSWER TO YOUR   QUESTION, "CAN WE COUNT THE TANDEM SPACES ON THE SECOND   GARAGE LEVEL TOWARDS MEETING OUR CODE REQUIREMENT IF WE   PROVIDE A VALET PARKING PLAN AND THE SPACES ARE USED   FOR VALETING THE STAFF, VISITORS, AND CAFE PARKING?"   PLEASE PROVIDE A BREAKDOWN LIKE THE TABLE PROVIDED IN   THE ADDENDUM. NOTE: IT DOES NOT NEED TO REPLACE ANY   TABLES YOU CURRENTLY PROVIDE.       21) REPEAT COMMENT: WHERE ARE THE GUEST PARKING SPACES   AND HOW ARE THEY ACCESSED (ARE THEY REQUIRED TO BE   VALET OR MAY THEY SELF-PARK)? THE 11 REQUIRED GUEST   PARKING SPACES MUST BE LABELED ON THE ON THE PLANS.       22) ADDITIONAL ADA COMMENTS FROM ROBERT BROWN REGARDING   THE SECOND LEVEL PARKING (ONLY AS CAFE CUSTOMERS) AND   GUEST PARKING:       A. SINCE A TOTAL OF 67 PARKING SPACES ARE BEING   PROVIDED EXCLUSIVELY FOR CAFE CUSTOMERS, NO MATTER   WHETHER THOSE ARE SELF-PARKING OR VALET, 3 ACCESSIBLE   PARKING SPACES MUST BE PROVIDED FOR CAF? CUSTOMERS AND   THE USERS MUST BE ABLE TO SELF-PARK IF THEY WANT TO.   THEIR VEHICLE MAY HAVE BEEN MODIFIED TO THE POINT WHERE   A VALET CANNOT OPERATE IT.   B. SINCE THE SPACES ARE EXCLUSIVELY FOR CAFE CUSTOMERS,   ONE OF THE ACCESSIBLE SPACES MUST BE VAN ACCESSIBLE.   C. THE USERS OF THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES MUST BE   ABLE TO SELF-PARK IF THEY WANT TO. THEIR VEHICLE MAY   HAVE BEEN MODIFIED TO THE POINT WHERE A VALET CANNOT   OPERATE IT.   D. WHEN THE GUEST PARKING SPACES ARE DESIGNATED ON THE   PLANS, IF THEY ARE EXCLUSIVELY FOR GUESTS, THEY MUST   INCLUDE ACCESSIBLE AND VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING IN   NUMBERS ACCORDING TO HOW MANY PARKING SPACES ARE   DESIGNATED EXCLUSIVELY FOR GUEST PARKING.       23) THE COMMENT RESPONSE STATES THAT THE LEVEL 3   PARKING AREA IS ONLY FOR RESIDENTS. DOES THIS MEAN THAT   THIS IS A SELF-PARK ONLY PARKING AREA?       24) TANDEM PARKING SPACES ARE SHOWN ON LEVEL 3. WHO   USES THESE TANDEM SPACES?       25) ON THE RESIDENT PARKING LEVELS, DO UNIT OWNERS OWN   DESIGNATED PARKING SPACES?       26) REPEAT COMMENT: THE ADA PARKING SPACE DETAIL   (ACCESSIBLE AND VAN ACCESSIBLE) ON SHEET A-054 DO NOT   CONFORM TO CITY STRIPING STANDARDS. IF YOU REQUIRE THE   CITY STANDARD DETAIL, PLEASE LET STAFF KNOW AND IT WILL   BE PROVIDED.       PARKING COUNTS:       27) SHEET A-100 BASEMENT LEVEL - CORRECT THE ERRORS   IDENTIFIED BELOW:       A. THE TABLE LISTS 168 TOTAL PARKING SPACES, YET THE   PARKING TAGS SHOW 169 PARKING SPACES, WHICH VERIFIES   STAFF'S COUNT OF THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES.   THERE ARE ONLY 14 COMPACT SPACES PROVIDED, NOT 15 AS   STATED IN THE TABLE.   THERE ARE 147 STANDARD PARKING SPACES PROVIDED, NOT 145   AS STATED IN THE TABLE.       B. THE PARKING BY TYPE TABLE LISTS 277 STANDARD PARKING   SPACES, YET STAFF HAS COUNTED 325 STANDARD PARKING   SPACES.       28) SHEET A-102 LOBBY LEVEL - CORRECT THE ERRORS   IDENTIFIED BELOW:       A. THE TABLE LISTS 43 TOTAL PARKING SPACES, YET STAFF   HAS COUNTED 68 PARKING SPACES.   THERE ARE 42 STANDARD PARKING SPACES PROVIDED, NOT 17   AS STATED IN THE TABLE.       B. THE BACK-UP DISTANCE BETWEEN SPACES 325 AND 344 ON   LEVEL 2 PARKING DOES NOT CONTAIN THE CODE MINIMUM 24   FEET AISLE, SO ONE OF THE SPACES MUST BE REMOVED (OR   CONVERTED TO A COMPACT SPADE).       29) SHEET A-103 LEVEL 3 - CORRECT THE ERRORS IDENTIFIED   BELOW:       A. THE TABLE LISTS 62 TOTAL PARKING SPACES, YET STAFF   HAS COUNTED 84 PARKING SPACES.   THERE ARE 61 STANDARD PARKING SPACES PROVIDED, NOT 40   AS STATED IN THE TABLE.   THERE IS 1 COMPACT PARKING SPACE PROVIDED THAT IS NOT   ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE TABLE.       B. THE PARKING SPACE NUMBERING ON SHEET A-103 STARTS AT   351 INSTEAD OF 347 (NEXT NUMBER IN SEQUENCE FROM SHEET   A-102) AND THUS THE BUILDING IS SHOWN TO HAVE 434   PARKING SPACES, WHICH IS NOT ACCURATE.       30) THERE ARE 430 TOTAL PARKING SPACES SHOWN ON THE   PLANS (INCLUDES 49 TANDEM SPACES). NOTE: THE VARIOUS   TABLES ALTERNATE BETWEEN COUNTING AND NOT COUNTING THE   TANDEM SPACES IN THE TOTAL. IT MAY BE BEST TO HAVE A   TOTAL OF THE SPACES THAT COUNT TOWARD THE PARKING   REQUIREMENT AND THEN LIST THE TANDEM SPACES ON EACH   FLOOR BELOW THE TOTAL AS ADDITIONAL AVAILABLE PARKING.       31) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING BICYCLE PARKING; HOWEVER:       A. PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS FOR THE BICYCLE RACK PAD   ALONG SOUTH OLIVE. THE DEPTH MUST BE AT LEAST SIX FEET   AND THE WIDTH IS BASED ON THE NUMBER OF RACK ELEMENTS.   B. PROVIDE THE DETAILS OF THE BICYCLE RACKS THAT WILL   BE USED WITHIN THE BICYCLE STORAGE ROOMS. THE BICYCLE   STORAGE ROOMS MUST SHOW THE ACCURATE RACKS AND THE   DIMENSIONS REQUIRED BASED ON THE TYPE OF RACKS.   C. REPEAT COMMENT: YOU MUST HAVE BICYCLE PARKING FOR   GUESTS (VISITORS) NEAR ONE OF THE GUEST ACCESSIBLE   ENTRANCES TO THE BUILDING. THE BICYCLE RACK BY THE CAFE   IS NOT NEAR AN ENTRANCE TO THE RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF   THE BUILDING THAT A GUEST CAN USE. IDENTIFY THE   ENTRANCE(S) THAT ARE GUEST ACCESSIBLE AND PROVIDE AT   LEAST ONE BICYCLE RACK, WITH PAD DIMENSIONS, ADJACENT   TO THAT ENTRANCE.       32) UPDATED COMMENT: PROVIDE MORE DETAIL ON THE   PROPOSED PRE-WIRING OF THE BUILDING FOR EV CHARGER   INSTALLATION. WHILE STAFF APPRECIATES THAT YOU HAVE   SHOWN 4 EV SPACES, NO DETAILS ON HOW THESE ACTUALLY   FUNCTION WERE PROVIDED, TO INCLUDE WHERE THE CHARGING   UNITS WOULD BE PLACED. PLEASE BE AWARE THAT AT LEAST   ONE ADA PARKING SPACE WILL NEED TO BE EV COMPATIBLE.   BELOW ARE THE REQUIREMENTS FOR EV FACILITIES BASED ON   THE FORTE PROJECT REQUIREMENTS AND ARE THE EXPECTATIONS   FOR THIS PROJECT. PLEASE NOTE THAT IT MAKES AVAILABLE   LEVEL I CHARGING FOR EVERY UNIT OWNER WITH THE   FACILITIES IN PLACE TO UPGRADE TO A LEVEL 2 CHARGER.       CHARGING STATIONS: ELECTRONIC VEHICLE INFRASTRUCTURE   MUST BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PERMITS ISSUED BY   THE CITY?S BUILDING DIVISION AS FOLLOWS:       A. ONE LEVEL 1 FULL CIRCUIT INSTALLATION IS REQUIRED   FOR EACH UNIT'S REQUIRED PARKING SPACES (109 TOTAL).   EACH CIRCUIT IS REQUIRED TO BE A 20 AMP, 120 VOLT   CIRCUIT, WITH RACEWAY/CONDUIT, WIRING, RECEPTACLE AND   OVERCURRENT PROTECTION TO CODE. THE DEVELOPER SHALL   INSTALL OVERSIZED RACEWAY/CONDUIT OR ADDITIONAL   RACEWAY/CONDUIT, AS APPROVED BY THE CITY'S BUILDING   DIVISION, THAT WILL PROVIDE THE ABILITY OF INDIVIDUAL   UNIT OWNERS OR THE HOMEOWNERS? ASSOCIATION TO INSTALL   THE WIRING, RECEPTACLE AND OVERCURRENT PROTECTION TO   CODE TO ALLOW PARKING SPACES TO BE UPGRADED TO A LEVEL   2, 40 AMP, 208/240 VOLT CIRCUIT. THE DEVELOPER SHALL   PROVIDE SPACE TO INSTALL AN ADDITIONAL ELECTRICAL PANEL   TO ACCOMMODATE LEVEL 2 FULL CIRCUIT UPGRADES.       B. TWO LEVEL 2 FULL CIRCUIT INSTALLATIONS ARE REQUIRED   FOR THE GUEST PARKING SPACES. EACH CIRCUIT IS REQUIRED   TO BE A 40 AMP, 208/240 VOLT CIRCUIT, WITH   RACEWAY/CONDUIT, WIRING, RECEPTACLE AND OVERCURRENT   PROTECTION TO CODE. ONE DUAL PORT ELECTRIC VEHICLE   CHARGER MUST BE INSTALLED FOR THE GUEST PARKING SPACES   PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY   FOR THE BUILDING.       C. ONE LEVEL 1 FULL CIRCUIT INSTALLATION IS REQUIRED   FOR FOUR (4) OF THE EMPLOYEE PARKING SPACES. EACH   CIRCUIT IS REQUIRED TO BE A 20 AMP, 120 VOLT CIRCUIT,   WITH RACEWAY/CONDUIT, WIRING, RECEPTACLE AND   OVERCURRENT PROTECTION TO CODE.       D. FOUR LEVEL 2 FULL CIRCUIT INSTALLATIONS ARE REQUIRED   FOR THE VALET PARKING SPACES. EACH CIRCUIT IS REQUIRED   TO BE A 40 AMP, 208/240 VOLT CIRCUIT, WITH   RACEWAY/CONDUIT, WIRING, RECEPTACLE AND OVERCURRENT   PROTECTION TO CODE. TWO DUAL PORT ELECTRIC VEHICLE   CHARGERS MUST BE INSTALLED FOR THE VALET PARKING SPACES   PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY   FOR THE BUILDING. THE VALET SPACES CONTAINING THE   ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGERS MAY NOT BE SOLD OR LEASED TO   RESIDENTS AND MUST REMAIN AVAILABLE FOR CHARGING   VEHICLES.       LOADING/ACCESS       33) UPDATED COMMENT: THE NORTH SIDE OF CURRIE CRESCENT   HAS ON-STREET PARALLEL PARKING SPACES. THE TRUCK   TURNING DIAGRAM SHOWS THE TRUCK USING THE FULL WIDTH OF   CURRIE CRESCENT, WHICH IS IMPOSSIBLE IF A CAR IS PARKED   IN THE PARALLEL SPACES. THE CITY'S PARKING DEPARTMENT   DOES NOT SUPPORT THE REMOVAL OF PARKING SPACES IN THIS   AREA AS THE PARKING SPACES SEE SIGNIFICANT USAGE. THE   PARKING DIVISION WILL SUPPORT THE RELOCATION OF THE   FIVE EXISTING PARKING SPACES TO THE NORTH SIDE OF DIANA   PLACE. YOU NEED TO SHOW THE RELOCATED PARKING SPACES   ALONG DIANA PLACE. SUGGESTION: RECONFIGURE THE PARKING   ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF DIANA PLACE TO BE A PARALLEL   CONFIGURATION. THIS WOULD ALLOW MORE ROOM FOR TREES AT   THE WEST END OF ROAD (WHERE THE ANGLE PARKING CURRENTLY   EXISTS), PUSH CARS (AND THEIR HEADLIGHTS AT NIGHT)   FURTHER AWAY FROM THE TOWNHOUSE UNITS ON THE WEST END   OF THE DEVELOPMENT, AND WOULD PROVIDE PARKING SPACES IN   FRONT OF ALL OF THE TOWNHOUSE UNITS THAT COULD BE   UTILIZED BY UNIT OWNER GUESTS WHO DO NOT WANT TO PARK   IN THE GARAGE.       34) REPEAT COMMENT: THE CITY'S ENGINEERING SERVICES   DEPARTMENT NEEDS TO APPROVE THE USE OF CURRIE CRESCENT   FOR MANEUVERING PRIOR TO THE CASE PROCEEDING THROUGH   THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS. CALL TO DISCUSS IS   SCHEDULED.       35) REPEAT COMMENT: THE CITY'S ENGINEERING SERVICES   DEPARTMENT NEEDS TO APPROVE THE NUMBER OF ACCESS POINTS   TO CURRIE CRESCENT AND THE SEPARATION OF ACCESS POINTS   TO THE CASE PROCEEDING THROUGH THE PUBLIC HEARING   PROCESS. CALL TO DISCUSS IS SCHEDULED.       WALLS       36) PROVIDE THE DETAILS OF THE DECORATIVE THREE-FOOT   WALL ALONG THE VEHICULAR USE AREA ON THE NORTH PROPERTY   LINE AND THE RETAINING WALLS.       37) THE PLANS SHOW A FENCE ALONG DIANA PLACE AT THE   TOWNHOUSE COURTYARDS. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE   TYPE OF FENCE AND THE COLUMNS AND GATES. SHEET LG-1.1   CALLS OUT THE COLUMNS AND GATES AS MAXIMUM 6 FEET. THE   PLANS DO NOT CALL OUT WHAT HEDGE MATERIAL WILL SCREEN   THE 4-FOOT-TALL FENCE. IN ORDER TO PROVIDE A   COMFORTABLE PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE ALONG THE NEW DIANA   PLACE WALKWAY, THE GATES NEED TO BE A PICKET STYLE AND   THE HEDGE AND GATES SHALL NOT EXCEED 5 FEET IN HEIGHT.       38) PROVIDE THE DETAILS OF THE STONE PLINTH WITH   DECORATIVE FENCE LISTED ON THE HARDSCAPE PLAN.       SIGNAGE       39) ONE OF THE COMMENT RESPONSES STATED THAT THERE   WOULD BE DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE TO GUIDE DRIVING CUSTOMERS   TO THE CAFE PARKING. PLEASE REVIEW THE SIGNAGE   ALLOWANCE FOR PARKING AREA IDENTIFICATION SIGNS TO   VERIFY WHAT SIZE AND SETBACKS ARE PERMITTED. PLEASE   NOTE THAT A BUSINESS NAME/LOGO IS NOT PERMITTED ON   PARKING AREA DIRECTIONAL SIGNS BY RIGHT. IF A SIGN THAT   DOES NOT CONFORM THE BY RIGHT ALLOWANCE IS BEING   CONTEMPLATED, THEN A SIGN PROGRAM THAT WAIVES THE CODE   PROVISIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION   EITHER AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION OR A SEPARATE FUTURE   MAJOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT. IF IT WILL BE   REVIEWED NOW, THE DETAILS MUST BE SUBMITTED FOR STAFF   REVIEW.       40) WHILE REVIEWING THE RESPONSE THAT GENERATED THE   PREVIOUS COMMENT, STAFF NOTED THAT NO SIGNAGE HAS BEEN   PROPOSED FOR THE PROPERTY. IT IS NOT REQUIRED THAT YOU   PROVIDE SIGN PLANS WITH THE APPLICATION; HOWEVER, THE   FUTURE SIGN PLANS MUST THEN COMPLY WITH ALL CODE   PROVISIONS. ANY WAIVERS OR DEVIATIONS FROM THE CODE   PROVISIONS WOULD NEED TO BE APPROVED BY THE CITY   COMMISSION AS A FUTURE MAJOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT   AMENDMENT. ADDITIONALLY, EVEN CODE COMPLIANT   FREE-STANDING SIGNS ARE CHANGES TO THE SITE PLAN, SO   THEIR LOCATION WILL REQUIRE A FUTURE MINOR PLANNED   DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT.       LANDSCAPE       41) THE LANDSCAPE PLANS NEED TO BE CLEANED UP TO SHOW   THE FINAL CONDITIONS ONLY. THE CURRENT PLANS INCLUDE   TREES THAT WILL NO LONGER REMAIN WHEN THE PROJECT IS   COMPLETED AND STRAY LINEWORK FROM THE EXISTING SITE   FEATURES (EX. CURBING IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE   PLAN WHICH MAKES IT APPEAR THAT THERE IS A WALL ACROSS   THE ENTRY DRIVE FROM FLAGLER).       42) SHEET LG-3.1 SHOWS THE STORMWATER LINE ALONG THE   LENGTH OF THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING WHILE SHEET   C-500 DOES NOT SHOW THE STORMWATER LINE IN THE SAME   CONFIGURATION. ALL PLANS MUST SHOW THE SAME, ACCURATE   CONDITIONS.       43) THE CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOW AN FPL LINE   ALONG THE FLAGLER DRIVE FRONTAGE. PROVIDE A CROSS   SECTION SHOWING THE DUCT BANK AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO   THE ROOT ZONES FOR THE OAK TREES PROPOSED ALONG FLAGLER   DRIVE.       44) SHEET LG-3.1 SHOWS PLANTING BEDS AGAINST THE WEST   SIDE OF THE BUILDING WHICH ARE NOT REFLECTED ON THE   CIVIL SHEETS OR SITE PLAN. ALL PLANS MUST SHOW THE   SAME, ACCURATE CONDITIONS.       DEVELOPMENT REGULATION: FPL EASEMENT WHICH BISECTS THE   PROPOSED BUILDING LOCATION WILL NEED TO BE RELEASED BY   FPL AND ALL OVERHEAD LINES MUST BE REMOVED. ANY NEW   UTILITY LINES MUST BE RELOCATED UNDERGROUND.       DEVELOPMENT REGULATION: THE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE CITY   OWNED PARCEL SOUTH OF THE PROPERTY, INCLUDING THE   SIDEWALK, WALKWAYS AND LANDSCAPE, WILL BE THE   MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE FLAGLER TOWERS   PROJECT. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS AND EASEMENTS WILL BE   REQUIRED.             Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-03-2021 Cont ID   Sent By eschneid Date 06-03-2021 Time 11:50 Rev Time 12.00 Received By eschneid Date 06-01-2021 Time 15:36 Sent To   Notes 2021-06-03 11:51:56 CASE NO. PB 1857B   FLAGLER TOWERS   1315 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE       - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,   [email protected]       - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN   WRITTEN FORMAT.       - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE   (3) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT   OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE   RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS   TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL   COMMENTS.       - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND   SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY,   JUNE 25, 2021, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE   AUGUST 17, 2021 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.       - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT   RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS   FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY AUGUST 10, 2021),   THE PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT THAT THE   CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL   REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.       - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)   RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED   COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE   APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE   WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).       - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED   IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION   94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT   REGULATIONS.       1) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE TRAFFIC STUDY THAT   STATES THAT THE PROJECT DOES NOT GENERATE A SIGNIFICANT   IMPACT. HOWEVER, YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A   PALM BEACH COUNTY TPS APPROVAL LETTER.       2) THE SITE PLAN SHOWS A SIDEWALK AND WALKWAYS TO THE   TOWNHOUSE UNITS BEING INSTALLED ON THE CITY OWNED   PARCEL SOUTH OF THE PROJECT. THE PARCEL IS SUBJECT TO A   DEED RESTRICTION THAT REQUIRES THE NORTON GALLERY AND   SCHOOL OF ART, INC., TO BE NOTIFIED OF PROPOSED CHANGES   TO THE PARCEL AND NOT OBJECT TO THE CHANGES. ONCE THE   FULL SCOPE OF CHANGES TO THE PARCEL ARE FINALIZED   BETWEEN THE APPLICANT AND STAFF, IT IS YOUR   RESPONSIBILITY TO PROVIDE WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE   NORTON GALLERY AND SCHOOL OF ART, INC., TO THE CITY.   THE SIDEWALK MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND   IT WILL BE THE FLAGLER TOWERS MAINTENANCE   RESPONSIBILITY. THERE WILL BE EASEMENTS AND OTHER   AGREEMENTS REQUIRED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF ANY   IMPROVEMENTS ON CITY PROPERTY.       3) FPL EASEMENT WHICH BISECTS THE PROPOSED BUILDING   LOCATION WILL NEED TO BE RELEASED BY FPL AND ALL   OVERHEAD LINES MUST BE REMOVED. ANY NEW UTILITY LINES   MUST BE RELOCATED UNDERGROUND.       4) YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT THE FFA APPROVAL FOR THE   PROPOSED TOWER PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THIS CASE FOR   PLANNING BOARD.       5) PROVIDE THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN WORD FORMAT.       6) STAFF WILL NOT SUPPORT A BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 300   FEET IN HEIGHT. THE PROPOSED 356-FOOT TALL TOWERS DO   NOT CONTINUE THE PATTERN OF BUILDINGS TRANSITIONING   DOWN IN HEIGHT AS THEY MOVE SOUTH ALONG SOUTH FLAGLER   DRIVE AND SOUTH OLIVE AVENUE TOWARD THE EXISTING LOWER   SCALE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS.       7) SHEET C-300 SHOWS THE SAME AT&T LINE AS REMAINING   AND BEING REMOVED. ALL PLANS MUST SHOW THE SAME   ACCURATE CONDITIONS.       BUILDING PLACEMENT       8) BASED ON THE BUILDING DESIGN, YOU ARE SHOWING A   ZERO-FOOT NORTH SETBACK FOR THE GROUND LEVEL. PLACING   DIRT AND A RETAINING WALL BETWEEN THE ABOVE GRADE LEVEL   OF PARKING AND THE PROPERTY LINE TO THE NORTH DOES NOT   MAKE THAT LEVEL OF BUILDING DISAPPEAR FOR THE PURPOSES   OF SETBACKS. STAFF DOES NOT CURRENTLY SUPPORT THIS   DESIGN BASED ON THE WAIVERS THAT IT REQUIRES.       9) THE BUILDING SETBACK ALONG SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE DOES   NOT COMPLY WITH THE THEME THAT HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED BY   PRIOR PROJECTS TO SET THE BUILDINGS BACK AND CREATE AN   ENHANCED VISUAL OPEN SPACE ALONG SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE.   NOT ONLY IS THE BUILDING NOT SET BACK APPROPRIATELY,   BUT THE OUTSIDE STAIRWAYS FROM THE TERRACES ENCROACH   INTO THE MINIMUM 25-FOOT FRONT SETBACK REQUIRED IF THIS   WAS AN MF32 ZONING BASED PROJECT NOT LOCATED ALONG   SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE.       10) THE TERRACE, WHILE NOT SHOWING AN EXACT SETBACK   DIMENSION ON THE PLANS, APPEARS TO BE APPROXIMATELY 25   FEET FROM SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE. THE TERRACE WALL EXTENDS   OVER EIGHT (8) FEET ABOVE THE SIDEWALK GRADE AND THUS   DOES NOT CREATE AN ENHANCEMENT FOR SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE.   THE FIRST LEVEL OF THE TOWNHOUSE UNITS WILL NOT BE   VISIBLE TO A PEDESTRIAN.       11) THE SOUTH PORTION OF THE BUILDING (BEHIND THE   FOUNTAIN) IS A STAIRCASE TO UP TO THE AMENITY DECK,   WHICH, UNLESS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC, IS ANOTHER SECTION OF   THE BUILDING BROUGHT CLOSE TO SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE WHICH   PROVIDES NO ACTIVE USE INTERACTION.       12) STAFF DOES NOT OPPOSE THE PODIUM SETBACK OF 15 FEET   ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE; HOWEVER, MORE DETAIL ON   THE INTERACTION BETWEEN THE TOWNHOUSES AND THE PROPOSED   SIDEWALK IS REQUIRED. THE RENDERINGS SEEM TO INDICATE   THAT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE WILL HAVE A HIGH   RETAINING WALL AT THE CORNER, WHICH DOES NOT FOSTER ANY   PERCEIVED INTERACTION WITH THE SITE. THE ADDITIONAL   DETAILING NEEDS TO SHOW THE ELEVATIONS BETWEEN THE   PROPOSED SIDEWALK AND THE ENTRY GARDENS.       13) STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE WESTERN TOWER BUILT TO   THE 15-FOOT PODIUM LINE. THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT   GOES TO GREAT LENGTHS TO STATE HOW THE DESIGN OF THE   PODIUM AND THE TOWER POSITIONING LESSONS THE IMPACT OF   THE MASS OF THE BUILDING. STAFF HAS ACCEPTED THIS IN   THE PAST ONLY WHEN THE TOWER IS SETBACK FROM THE EDGE   OF THE PODIUM. BUILDING A 20 PLUS STORY TOWER 15 FEET   FROM A PROPERTY LINE ACCENTUATES THE SIZE OF THE   BUILDING.       14) THE NORTH/SOUTH PORTION OF CURRIE CRESCENT IS A   FRONT PROPERTY LINE, WHICH REQUIRES A 25-FOOT, NOT   10-FOOT SETBACK. NOTE: THIS IS NOT A FENCE HEIGHT   WAIVER FOR THE WALL, SINCE THE WALL IS THE BUILDING   WALL THAT ENCROACHES INTO THE SETBACK.       15) THE EAST/WEST PORTION OF CURRIE CRESCENT IS A SIDE   PROPERTY LINE SO IT MUST MEET THE ONE-FOOT SETBACK FOR   EACH TWO FEET IN HEIGHT REQUIREMENT. THIS SECTION IS   NOT COVERED IN YOUR WAIVER REQUEST.       16) SHEET G-201 SHOWS THE BAY WINDOWS BEING 18 INCHES   DEEP. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THE WAIVER REQUEST IS FOR 36   INCHES.       17) SHEET G-201 SHOWS THE BALCONY BEING 3 FEET 8 INCHES   DEEP. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THE WAIVER REQUEST IS FOR 5   FEET.       18) STAFF DOES NOT OBJECT TO THE CAFE AWNINGS   ENCROACHING 7 FEET INTO THE WESTERN SETBACK OVER THE   ENTRANCES TO THE CAFE FROM THE OUTDOOR SEATING.       19) STAFF IS NOT PREPARED TO SUPPORT A 12-FOOT CANOPY   ENCROACHMENT INTO THE WEST SETBACK. THERE HAS BEEN   INADEQUATE JUSTIFICATION PROVIDED AS TO WHY SUCH A DEEP   CANOPY IS REQUIRED AT THIS ENTRANCE.       20) STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE 12-FOOT CANOPY   ENCROACHMENT INTO THE SOUTH SETBACK. THE BUILDING   SETBACK IS ALREADY BEING REQUESTED TO BE REDUCED HAS   ALREADY BEEN REDUCED BY OVER 150 FEET. ENCROACHING   FURTHER INTO THE SETBACK IS NOT JUSTIFIED FOR THE   CANOPY. ADDITIONALLY, A 12-FOOT AWNING ENCROACHES INTO   THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER WHERE THE PROPOSED OAK   TREE IS LOCATED.       21) PROVIDE THE SETBACK DIMENSIONS OF THE PODIUM   (INCLUDING THE AMENITIES LEVEL) AND THE TWO TOWERS.   THIS IS THE METHODOLOGY USED ON THE NEARBY TOWERS TO   ESTABLISH THE BUILDING SETBACKS.       22) THE SITE OPEN SPACE IS INCORRECTLY CALCULATED. THE   AREAS SUCH AS THE MOTOR COURT AND THE DRIVE WHERE IT IS   ABOVE THE FIRST LEVEL OF THE BUILDING IS NOT OPEN SPACE   IT IS A BUILDING ROOF.       ELEVATIONS       23) PROVIDE THE ELEVATION HEIGHTS OF ALL THE FEATURES   ON THE AMENITY DECK AND THE LEVEL 5 PLANS FOR THE ROOF.       24) PROVIDE THE ELEVATION HEIGHT OF THE ROOF TOP   MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND COOLING TOWER.       25) PROVIDE ELEVATION HEIGHTS FOR THE VARIOUS FEATURES   ALONG THE SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE FRONTAGE.       PARKING       26) PLEASE PROVIDE HOW THE PARKING SPACES WILL BE   ASSIGNED IN THE BUILDING. THERE ARE SEVERAL PRIVATE   GARAGES WHICH INCLUDE THREE CAR SPACES. GIVEN THAT THE   PARKING TABLE (PRIOR TO ANY OF THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS   BEING ADDRESSED) SHOWS THAT THERE IS ONLY ONE EXTRA   PARKING SPACE, ASSIGNING MULTIPLE UNITS MORE THAN TWO   PARKING SPACES DOES NOT PERMIT THE OTHER UNITS TO HAVE   THE REQUIRED TWO PARKING SPACES.       27) IS THERE A VALET? PROVIDE THE VALET PLAN. PLEASE   NOTE THAT VALETS ARE NOT PERMITTED TO USE THE PUBLIC   RIGHTS-OF-WAY FOR MANEUVERING.       28) HOW DOES A RESTAURANT/CAFE PARKING CUSTOMER OR A   GUEST KNOW WHICH PARKING ENTRANCE TO USE?       29) WHERE ARE THE RESTAURANT/CAFE PARKING AND GUEST   PARKING SPACES. THESE NEED TO BE DESIGNATED ON THE   PLAN.       30) PROVIDE A DRAWING SHOWING HOW A RESTAURANT OR CAFE   CUSTOMER GETS FROM THE PUBLIC PARKING TO THE RESTAURANT   OR CAFE.       31) WHO HAS ACCESS TO THE PARKING FIELD ON SHEET A-102?   DEPENDING ON WHO HAS ACCESS, STAFF MAY HAVE COMMENTS   REGARDING PARKING SPACE ACCESS AND TURN AROUND   DEFICIENCIES.       32) WHO HAS ACCESS TO THE PARKING FIELD ON SHEET A-103?   DEPENDING ON WHO HAS ACCESS, STAFF MAY HAVE COMMENTS   REGARDING PARKING SPACE ACCESS AND TURN AROUND   DEFICIENCIES.       33) ARE THE PARKING AREAS GATED? IF NOT HOW IS ACCESS   CONTROLLED? IF SO, PROVIDE INFORMATION ON STACKING AND   CALL BOXES.       34) THE ADA PARKING SPACE DETAILS ON SHEET A-054 DO NOT   CONFORM TO CITY STRIPING STANDARDS.       35) THE ADA PARKING SPACES DO NOT APPEAR TO THE BE   CLOSEST PARKING SPACES TO THE ELEVATORS LEADING TO THE   UPPER FLOOR RESTAURANT OR TO THE CORRIDOR LEADING TO   THE CAFE. PLEASE EXPLAIN.       36) SHOW THE DEPTH DIMENSIONS FOR THE PARKING ROWS.       37) THE DEAD-END PARKING ROW CONTAINING SPACES 112 AND   162 MUST EITHER HAVE A MARKED TURN AROUND SPACE OR BE   ALL ASSIGNED PARKING SPACES IN AN AREA WHERE A   RESTAURANT/CAFE OR GUEST PARKER CANNOT ACCESS.       38) DESCRIBE HOW THE MOTOR COURT WILL FUNCTION. WILL   CARS BE PARKED HERE FOR ANY REASON?       39) THE BUILDING IS DEFICIENT IN PARKING:       A. YOU ARE PROPOSING A LUXURY HIGH RISE BUILDING THAT   WILL REQUIRE ON-SITE STAFF. PLANNING STAFF REQUIRES   THAT YOU PROVIDE PARKING SPACES WITHIN THE PARKING LOT   FOR THE ON-SITE STAFF SO THAT THESE EMPLOYEES ARE NOT   REQUIRED TO PARK IN THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS.   PLEASE PROVIDE HOW MANY RESIDENTIAL STAFF WILL ON-SITE   AT PEAK TIME SO THE PROPER NUMBER OF SPACES CAN BE   DETERMINED.   B. ONLY THE OUTSIDE TANDEM PARKING SPACE MAY COUNT   TOWARD MEETING THE PARKING REQUIREMENT.   C. SPACES 1 AND 2 ON THE BASEMENT LEVEL DO NOT HAVE   ADEQUATE BACK OUT MANEUVERING ROOM AND THUS DO NOT   FUNCTION.   D. PARKING SPACE 82 DOES NOT PROVIDE SAFE   INGRESS/EGRESS TO THE SPACE GIVEN THE PROXIMITY TO THE   GARAGE ENTRANCE AND THE WALLS.       40) HOW DOES THE PERSON PARKING IN SPACE 110 LEAVE THE   GARAGE?       41) PROVIDE THE ANGLE OF PARKING SPACES 131 AND 132 AND   PROVIDE DIMENSION LINES TO VERIFY THAT THEY MEET THE   CODE REQUIRED BACK UP DISTANCE.       42) NO BICYCLE PARKING WAS PROVIDED.       A. YOU MUST HAVE BICYCLE PARKING FOR THE   CAFE/RESTAURANT USERS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH OLIVE AVENUE   SIDE OF THE SITE.   B. YOU MUST HAVE A BICYCLE STORAGE ROOM FOR RESIDENTS.   C. YOU MUST HAVE BICYCLE PARKING FOR GUESTS NEAR ONE OF   THE GUEST ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCES TO THE BUILDING.       43) PROVIDE MORE DETAIL ON THE PROPOSED PRE-WIRING OF   THE BUILDING FOR EV CHARGER INSTALLATION. THERE ARE A   NUMBER OF SPACES THAT ARE HEAD TO HEAD AS WELL AS THE   TANDEM SPACES THAT DO NOT SEEM TO HAVE SPACE FOR   CHANGING UNITS. PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE ELECTRICAL   ROOM NEEDS TO INCLUDE EXTRA SPACE FOR THE ADDITIONAL   PANELS.       LOADING/ACCESS       44) THE NORTH SIDE OF CURRIE CRESCENT HAS ON-STREET   PARALLEL PARKING SPACES. THE TRUCK TURNING DIAGRAM   SHOWS THE TRUCK USING THE FULL WIDTH OF CURRIE   CRESCENT, WHICH IS IMPOSSIBLE IF A CAR IS PARKED IN THE   PARALLEL SPACES, AND THUS IS NOT PERMITTED.       45) WHERE WILL A FULL-SIZED MOVING TRUCK PARK FOR THE   RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE PROJECT?       46) WHAT IS THE PLAN FOR GARBAGE PICK-UP?       47) THE CITY'S ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT NEEDS TO   APPROVE THE USE OF CURRIE CRESCENT FOR MANEUVERING   PRIOR TO THE CASE PROCEEDING THROUGH THE PUBLIC HEARING   PROCESS.       48) THE CITY'S ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT NEEDS TO   APPROVE THE NUMBER OF ACCESS POINTS TO CURRIE CRESCENT   AND THE SEPARATION OF ACCESS POINTS TO THE CASE   PROCEEDING THROUGH THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS.       TOWNHOUSE UNITS       49) PLEASE PROVIDE A SAMPLE FLOOR PLAN ON HOW THE   TOWNHOUSE UNITS WILL WORK. THE LINEWORK ON LEVEL ONE   SEEMS TO SHOW WHAT APPEAR TO BE 16 TOWNHOUSES.       WALLS       50) THE PROPOSED USE INCLUDES NON-RESIDENTIAL USES SO A   SCREEN WALL IS REQUIRED ALONG THE NORTH AND SOUTH   PROPERTY LINES. THE CITY COMMISSION, ON BEHALF OF THE   CITY, WHO OWNS THE PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH MAY WAIVER THE   REQUIREMENT AS PART OF THE RPD, BUT YOU HAVE NOT   REQUESTED THIS WAIVER. PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE   WALL ALONG THE ENTIRE NORTH PROPERTY LINE COMPLIES WITH   THE SECTION 94-443A.1 REQUIREMENTS OR THAT THE PROPERTY   OWNER TO THE NORTH HAS GRANTED A WAIVER FOR THE   REQUIRED WALL. NOTE: AN EARLIER COMMENT RELATES TO THE   NORTH PROPERTY LINE AND ITS DESIGN.       51) WALL HEIGHTS ARE MEASURED FROM THE ACTUAL GRADE ON   THE EXTERIOR OF THE WALL, NOT THE MEAN GRADE OF THE   PROPERTY USED FOR BUILDING HEIGHT. UPDATE YOUR WALL   HEIGHT PLANS, CROSS SECTIONS AND REQUIRED WAIVERS TO   COMPLY.       52) NO INFORMATION IS PROVIDED ABOUT WHAT APPEARS TO BE   A WALL WITH STEPS AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE.       CAFE/RESTAURANT       53) PROVIDE A DIAGRAM SHOWING HOW A PUBLIC CUSTOMER   ACCESSES THE RESTAURANT.       54) SHEET LG-3.1 CALLS OUT THE SURFACE AS SOD AT THE   AREA SHOWN AS OUTDOOR SEATING FOR THE CAFE ALONG SOUTH   OLIVE AVENUE. THERE ARE DISCREPANCIES ON THE VARIOUS   PLANS AS TO WHAT THE AREA IN FRONT OF THE CAFE LOOKS   LIKE ON THE VARIOUS PLANS. ALL PLANS MUST SHOW THE   SAME, ACCURATE CONDITIONS.           Print Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved