Plan Review Details - Project Z21050010
Plan Review Stops For Project Z21050010
Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-09-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By scwelter Date 06-09-2021 Time 14:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By scwelter Date 06-09-2021 Time 14:33 Sent To  
Notes
2021-06-09 14:32:59PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT:
 IF TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT ARE
 OVER $500,000 IT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC ART
 REQUIREMENT AS PER CITY ORDINANCE.
 SECTION 78-129: ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS,
 INCLUDING NEW CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR
 IMPROVEMENT OF AN EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE TOTAL
 CONSTRUCTION COSTS ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN
 $500,000 ARE SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT.
 OPTION 1: INSTALL ARTWORK ON THE DEVELOPMENT SITE
 VALUED IN AN AMOUNT NOT LESS THAN ONE PERCENT OF THE
 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS; OR
 OPTION 2: CONTRIBUTE AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO 75 PERCENT OF
 ONE PERCENT OF THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR DEPOSIT
 TO THE PUBLIC ART ACCOUNT.
 A COMPLETED PUBLIC ART ASSESSMENT APPLICATION IS
 REQUIRED AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 PLEASE CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER AT [email protected] OR
 561.822.1521 TO OBTAIN AN APPLICATION AND REVIEW THE
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-09-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 06-09-2021 Time 20:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 06-09-2021 Time 20:23 Sent To  
Notes
2021-06-09 20:34:14DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. FLOOD ZONE. ACCORDING TO THE ADOPTED FLOOD INSURANCE
 RATE MAPS (FIRMS), THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS IN FLOOD
 ZONE AE, WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 7 FT NAVD. THE
 FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL ASSOCIATED
 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS ETC.) SHALL
 BE 24 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD
 ELEVATION.
  
 3. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THE PLANS SHOW
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES BUT NONE OF THEM ARE MARKED
 AS VAN ACCESSIBLE. PER SECTION 208.2.4 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX REQUIRED
 ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING
 STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND DESIGNED IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY
 CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT
 SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)
  
 4. UNITY OF TITLE. FOR ANY BUILDING CROSSING A PROPERTY
 LINE, EITHER A RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE, OR SOME OTHER
 APPROVED LEGAL INSTRUMENT, SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE
 PERMIT APPLICATION, OR THE BUILDING MUST HAVE A FIRE
 WALL ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, PER SECTION 202 OF
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, FIRE SEPARATION
 DISTANCE.
  
 5. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 6. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
 NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
 MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
 BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
 EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
 TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
 OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 7. EAST EXIT STAIRS. OCCUPANTS LEAVING THE BUILING VIA
 TTHE EAST EXIT STAIRS IN AN EMERGENCY HAVE ONLY ONE WAY
 TO GET TO THE STREET AND ARE COMPELLED TO PASS ALONG
 THE SIDE OF THE BUILDING WITHIN 10 FEET OF FROM THE
 WALLS OF THE BUILDING. PER SECTION 1028.4.2 EITHER THE
 ADJACENT WALLS MUST BE 1 HOUR FIRE-RATED OR THE EGRESS
 PATH MUST BE NOT LESS THAN 10 FEET AWAY FROM THE
 BUILDING.
  
 8. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 9. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
 CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.
  
 10. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
 AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
 CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
 THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.
  
 11. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
 WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
 HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
 OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
 CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 12. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
 TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE
 ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-12-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 10-12-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 10-12-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-10-12 10:49:53COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENG.
 SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098 [email protected] :
  
 1. CONFIRM THAT A COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE
 HAS BEEN SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF
 CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION).
 2. CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY
 SEWER ARE REQUIRED.
 3. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE
 CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEMANDS
 FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE
 FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-8 FOR
 WATER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR SEWER.
 4. PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND
 STORMWATER PIPES ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE.
 (RESPONSE LETTER INDICATES IT HAS BEEN PROVIDED, UNABLE
 TO LOCATE.)
 5. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND
 IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED
 AREAS.
 6. COORDINATE WITH MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE
 SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING
 PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT
 HIM AT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]
 7. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL , PLANS SHALL SHOW
 PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER,
 STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES, INCLUDING
 STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY
 SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, METERS, AND
 OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH
 BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES
 SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS,
 CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND
 MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER LINES. ALL
 AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PROFILE VIEW.
 DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN
 VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. ADDITIONALLY,
 PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
 ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
 FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 8. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, CUT AND CAP
 UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY ABANDONED UTILITY
 LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY RIGHT OF WAY.
 9. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE DEDICATED
 UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO
 PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. ADJUST PROPOSED EASEMENT
 TO EXCLUDE BACKFLOW (BF MUST BE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
 OUTSIDE OF EASEMENT).
 10. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION OF WATER
 METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION.
 11. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE CALLOUT
 DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA AND FIRE BACKFLOW
 PREVENTER AS DCDA. SPECIFY LEAD FREE DESIGN ON ALL
 BACKFLOWS.
 12. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND
 NPDES NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.
 - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:
 - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS
 THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF
 DEVELOPMENT OR SALE; AND
 - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE
 STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A
 MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).
 - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF
 CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION
 THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL
 SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
 OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION. IF THE ENGINEERING PLANS DO
 NOT INCLUDE AN EROSION CONTROL PLAN, THEN THE
 CONTRACTOR SHOULD SUBMIT ONE PRIOR TO RECEIVING THE
 ENGINEERING PERMIT.
 13. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES
 OF PROPOSED AND EXISTING WATER AND SEWER WITHIN RIGHT
 OF WAY AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
 14. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING
 APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT
 SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING
 SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED
 LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
 15. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL CLEARLY SHOW ROAD
 RIGHT OF WAY.
 16. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL PROVIDE SANITARY
 ELEVATIONS AT MANHOLE TIE-IN.
 17. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES
 ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY
 LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT
 PARCELS.
 18. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES
 ARE BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL
 ADDRESSES.
 19. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN TRENCHING IN
 IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE 50
 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF
 PROPOSED TRENCH PER CURRENT CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL
 GC-8.
 20. PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING AND
 INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER
 (Z-XXXXXXXX).
  
 COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE
 SUPER., WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-494-2262 OR
 [email protected]:
  
 PLEASE SHOW ALL EXISTING WATER SERVICES, METERS, AND
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ON THE WATER PLAN AND LABEL WHAT IS
 HAPPENING TO THEM.
 RESPONSE: EXISTING SERVICES ARE SHOWN ON SHEET C4. NOTE
 ON PLANS REQUIRES ANY UNUSED SERVICES TO BE ABANDONED
 AND CAPPED AT THE MAIN.
 FOLLOWUP: FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL,
 SPECIFICALLY CALLOUT AND LABEL EXISTING WATER SERVICE
 THAT WILL BE ABANONDED AND CAPPED ON WATER PLAN. ALSO
 SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING WATER SERVICES AND SEWER
 LATERALS FOR THE PROPERTIES ON WEST SIDE OF FLAGLER
 DRIVE.
  
 THERE APPEARS TO BE A TREE CONFLICT WITH UTILITY POLE
 NEAR SOUTHWEST CORNER OF PROPERTY.
 RESPONSE: THE OVERHEAD LINES ARE PROPOSED TO BE PLACED
 UNDERGROUND ON THE SUBJECT SITE.
 FOLLOWUP: SHOW AND LABEL ANY PROPOSED PAD TRANSFORMERS
 ON PLANS.
  
  
 NEW COMMENTS:
  
 -IS A DO NOT ENTER SIGN NEEDED FOR THE NORTH DRIVEWAY?
  
 -SOME TREES ARE IN SIGHT TRIANGLES. IS THAT ALRIGHT?
  
 -THERE IS RECTANGULAR OBJECT ABOUT 18 FEET SOUTH OF
 CLEANOUTS ON CIVIL PLANS, BUT NOT ON OTHER PLANS.
 PLEASE LABEL WHAT IT IS AND UPDATE OTHER PLANS IF
 NEEDED.
  
 -WILL DOCK NEED FIRE PROTECTION?
  
 -DOES WATER DEMAND CALCULATION INCLUDE IRRIGATION AND
 DOCK USE? DOES SEWER DEMAND INCLUDE THE DOCK USE?
  
 -WATER PIPE TO DOCK NEEDS TO COMPLY WITH ANY PLUMBING
 BACKFLOW PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS.
  
 -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL: ADD INVERT ELEVATION
 INFO FOR NORTH SEWER MANHOLE IN FLAGLER DR., ADD FIRE
 FLOW CALCULATIONS TO WATER PLAN, CALLOUT CROSSING
 ELEVATION INFO FOR ANY UTILITIES IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO
 PROPOSED SEWER LATERAL.
  
 -WILL THERE BE ANY EXFILTRATION TRENCHES ON SITE? IF
 SO, LABEL ON CIVIL PLAN OR SHOW ON LEGEND.
  
 -WILL FDC HEIGHT BLOCK VISIBILITY OF STOP SIGN?
  
 -ON WATER PLAN, SHOW EXISTING GATE VALVE IN SIDEWALK
 FOR EXISTING 4 INCH DIP WM.
  
 -LABEL DCDA ON WATER PLAN.
  
 -IN CASE ROOM WITH DCDA FLOODS, WILL THERE BE A DRAIN
 PIPE?
  
 -ADD ABOVE GROUND TO LABEL OF 6 INCH METER.
  
 -SHOW AND LABEL GATE VALVE FOR FIRELINE NEAR WATER
 MAIN. ADD POINT OF SERVICE WORDING TO LABEL.
  
 -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL: CALLOUT CONNECTIONS
 TO WATER MAINS AS TAPS OR CUT-IN TEES, LABEL ANY SAMPLE
 POINTS ON WATER PLAN.
  
  
  
 NOTE THAT THERE MAY BE PENDING COMMENTS FROM MICHAEL
 TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES,
 561-494-1047, [email protected]
  
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS.
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-07-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 06-07-2021 Time 08:18 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-06-07 08:20:34Z21050010 ? SCUBA CLUB 4708 N FLAGLER ? INITIAL REVIEW
 1. THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF
 REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY
 AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND
 WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. TO VIEW
 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER
 ENGINEERING RELATED DOCUMENTS, GO HERE:
 HTTPS://WWW.WPB.ORG/GOVERNMENT/ENGINEERING
 2. CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH,
 FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08, ADOPTED
 SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18) CHAPTER 90
 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. SEC. 90-7.
 POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER SERVICE
 FACILITIES OF THE CITY:
 THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
 BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
 BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
 3. AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
 MORE INFORMATION, GO TO:
 HTTPS://WWW.WPB.ORG/GOVERNMENT/ENGINEERING
 4. PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC
 RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF
 YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
 MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
 IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
 [email protected] OR 561-494-1040 FOR FURTHER
 ASSISTANCE.
 5. PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS
 OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES,
 INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND
 SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES,
 METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE
 SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING
 GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS,
 ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL
 INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER
 LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN
 VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
 PLEASE SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT
 MATERIAL. ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL
 EXISTING AND PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT,
 INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &
 TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL
 UTILITY CROSSINGS.
 6. CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY
 ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
 ROW.
 7. PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE
 DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB
 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION).
 8. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM
 AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE
 PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER.
 9. SHOW VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION INFORMATION
 (NAVD 88 AND NGVD 29).
 10. PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND
 STORMWATER ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE.
 11. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND
 IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED
 AREAS.
 12. PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
 PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
 13. PLEASE LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE
 APPLICABLE.
 14. PLEASE PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED
 LOCATION OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION.
 15. COORDINATE WITH MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE
 SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING
 PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT
 HIM AT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]
 16. PROVIDE DEDICATED UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS
 FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS.
  
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS.
 RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT, (561) 494-1098 [email protected]
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD
 CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES,
 PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]:
 COMMENTS AS FOLLOWS:
 -WILL THE EXISTING DOCK REMAIN, OR WILL IT BE REMOVED?
 -PLEASE SUBMIT DEMOLITION PLAN IF THERE WILL BE
 DEMOLITION.
 -ON THE WATER PLAN, PLEASE SHOW THE LARGE WATER MAIN
 THAT IS NEAR THE LENGTH OF THE SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE.
 -WILL THERE BE A STRUCTURE WITH WALLS AROUND THE
 DUMPSTER?
 -PLEASE SHOW ALL EXISTING WATER SERVICES, METERS, AND
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ON THE WATER PLAN AND LABEL WHAT IS
 HAPPENING TO THEM.
 -LABEL THE EXISTING WATER & SEWER MAINS WITH PIPE SIZE
 AND MATERIAL TYPE.
 -WATER PLAN IS MISSING WATER DEMAND CALCULATIONS.
 PLEASE ADD.
 -SHOW AND LABEL ALL UTILITY POLES NEAR THE WEST
 PROPERTY LINE ON THE CIVIL PLANS.
 -SHOW AND LABEL THE NEAREST FIRE HYDRANT TO FDC ON THE
 WATER PLAN.
 -ARE THERE ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WELLS ON SITE?
 -WILL A SEPARATE METERED IRRIGATION WATER SERVICE BE
 NEEDED?
 -LABEL OBJECT ON SITE PLAN THAT IS ABOUT 10 FEET SOUTH
 OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PROPERTY.
 -VERIFY TREES ARE ALLOWED TO BE INSTALLED IN FPL
 EASEMENT.
 -THERE APPEARS TO BE A TREE CONFLICT WITH UTILITY POLE
 NEAR SOUTHWEST CORNER OF PROPERTY.
 -DOMESTIC WATER METER IS NOT SHOWN ON WATER PLAN.
 PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL NEAR THE WEST PROPERTY LINE.
 -IF DOMESTIC WATER METER IS 3 INCHES OR LARGER, IT
 NEEDS TO BE INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND.
 -SOME TREES NEAR SOUTH PROPERTY LINE MAY CONFLICT WITH
 WATER UTILITIES, ESPECIALLY THE WATER MAIN RUNNING WEST
 TO EAST FOR THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY.
 -TREES NEAR NORTH PROPERTY LINE MAY CREATE MAINTENANCE
 PROBLEM FOR THE PRIVATE FIRELINE PIPING.
 -PROPERTY OWNER WOULD HAVE TO SUBMIT AND RECORD A
 BACKFLOW COVENANT.
 -DOMESTIC BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY NEEDS TO BE LOCATED
 ADJACENT TO THE DOMESTIC WATER METER NEAR THE WESTERN
 PROPERTY LINE.
 -LOCATION OF PRIVATE WATER UTILITY PIPING UNDER
 DUMPSTER AREA MAY CREATE MAINTENANCE CONFLICT FOR
 PROPERTY OWNER.
 -SHOW GATE VALVE FOR DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE IF IT WILL
 BE LARGER THAN 2 INCHES. TRY TO LOCATE IT OUT OF THE
 SIDEWALK.
 -SHOW ALL EXISTING SEWER LATERALS FOR THE PROPERTY AND
 WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THEM.
 -UTILITY WORK IN STREET MAY REQUIRE PAVEMENT
 RESTORATION OF FLAGLER DRIVE.
 -CONSIDER INSTALLING PARALLEL/DUAL BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES
 FOR THE DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE TO MINIMIZE WATER
 OUTAGES DURING BACKFLOW MAINTENANCE.
  
 RESPECTFULLY,
  
 MARK HURLEY
 FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC UTILITIES
 561-822-2262
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 10-06-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 10-06-2021 Time 15:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 10-06-2021 Time 15:17 Sent To  
Notes
2021-10-06 15:28:08FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES.
  
 FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES NOT
 CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT THE
 APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-09-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 06-09-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 06-09-2021 Time 13:31 Sent To  
Notes
2021-06-09 13:52:48THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT; HOWEVER, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE
 PROVIDED AND MAY NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATIONS WHERE
 APPLICABLE.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
 6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,
 PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,
 INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE
 OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)
  
 7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA
 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE
 BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE
 BEING CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED
 TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE
 PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
 IT IS RECOMMENDED FOR HIGH RISES HAVE TWO SEPARATE FDC
 LOCATIONS REMOTELY LOCATED.
  
 7A. PER NFPA 14
 6.4.5.4* FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED
 NOT MORE THAN 100 FT (30.5 M) FROM THE NEAREST FIRE
 HYDRANT CONNECTED TO AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY.
  
 7B. PER NFPA 1
 18.3 WATER SUPPLIES.
 18.3.1* AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING
 THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE
 PROVIDED TO ALL PREMISES UPON WHICH FACILITIES,
 BUILDINGS, OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS ARE HEREAFTER
 CONSTRUCTED OR MOVED INTO THE JURISDICTION. THE
 APPROVED WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 SECTION 18.4.
 PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004,
 FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE
 POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF
 APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT,
 CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR
 AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER
 SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA)
 AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS
 PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS.
 FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE
 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?
  
 7C. THE LOCATION OF THE DDCV FIRE LINE LOCATION SHALL
 MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE
 COORDINATED WITH THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S
 ENGINEERS OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S
 PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE.
  
 7D. THERE IS AN INDICATION OF A BOAT DOCK EXTINDING
 INTO THE INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY.
  
 IT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIRMENTS OF THE 2016 ED
 NFPA 303, FIRE PROTECTION STANDARD FOR MARINAS AND
 BOATYARDS, WHICH MAY REQUIRE A FIRE HYDRANT, FDC AND
 STANDPIPE SYSTEM.
  
  
 8. A CLASS ?A? NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM
 SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP
 DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND
 APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY
 INSTALLATION.
  
 9. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7
 KEYWAY SYSTEM.
  
 ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S
 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA
 B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.
 ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN
 WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL
 LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET
 MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER
 ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN
 AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE
 IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
 EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
 PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
 SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
 ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE
 BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND
 FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET
 OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER
 ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES.
  
 12. COMMAND ROOM : THE ROOM IS LOCATED WITHIN THE
 CENTER OF THE BUILDING. THE ROOM LOCATION IS REQUIRED
 TO BE LOCATED PER THE AHJ. CAN THE ROOM BE
 RELOCATED/SWITCHED TO AN EXTERIOR WALL WITH ACCESS FROM
 THE EXTERIOR WALL..I.E THE EMPLOYEE LOUNGE OR DOM W
 PUMP ROOM?
 THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1,
 CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN
 THE FOLLOWING FEATURES:
  
 11.9.1 THE LOCATION, DESIGN, CONTENT, AND FIRE
 DEPARTMENT ACCESS OF THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL
 BE APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.
  
 11.9.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE SEPARATED
 FROM THE REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING BY A FIRE BARRIER
 HAVING A FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 1
 HOUR.
  
 11.9.3 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER ROOM SHALL BE A
 MINIMUM OF 96 FT2 (8.9 M2) WITH A MINIMUM DIMENSION OF
 8 FT (2.4 M).
  
 A. PER FL BLDG CODE;(MORE STRICT) IT SHALL BE A MINIMUM
 OF 200 FT SQUARED WITH A MINIMUM DIMENSION OF 10 FT.
 B. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.
 C. A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
 ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
 D. SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL
 FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF
 EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING
 EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS AND THE LOCATION
 OF FIRE WALLS, FIRE BARRIERS, FIRE PARTITIONS, SMOKE
 BARRIERS AND SMOKE PARTITIONS
 E. A WORK TABLE.
 F. IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
 FOR THE BUILDING.
 G. THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
 CONTROL UNIT.
 H. ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION OF
 THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL
 I. STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR DISTRIBUTION
 SYSTEMS.
 J. CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS SIMULTANEOUSLY
 K. SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY
 PANELS
 L. EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS
 M. FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
 N. GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND
 TRANSFER FEATURES.
 O. PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED
 BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE
 P. CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL
 Q. ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME
 A17.1.
 R. ELEVATOR EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER SELECTOR
 SWITCH(ES), WHERE EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER IS
 PROVIDED
 11.8.6* EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER.
 11.8.6.1 AN EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE PROVIDED
 IN A
 LOCATION APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.
 11.8.6.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL CONTAIN THE
 FOLLOWING:
 (1) VOICE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM PANELS AND CONTROLS
 (2) FIRE DEPARTMENT TWO-WAY TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION
 SERVICE
 PANELS AND CONTROLS WHERE REQUIRED BY ANOTHER SECTION
 OF THIS
 CODE
 (3) FIRE DETECTION AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATION
 PANELS
 (4) ELEVATOR FLOOR LOCATION AND OPERATION ANNUNCIATORS
 (5) ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME
 A17.1/CSA B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS AND ESCALATORS
 (6) ELEVATOR EMERGENCY POWER SELECTOR SWITCH(ES) WHERE
 PROVIDED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME A17.1/CSA B44
 (7) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATERFLOW ANNUNCIATORS
 (8) EMERGENCY GENERATOR STATUS INDICATORS
 (9) CONTROLS FOR ANY AUTOMATIC STAIRWAY DOOR UNLOCKING
 SYSTEM
 (10) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
 (11) TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
 ACCESS TO THE
 PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
 (12) STAIRWAY VIDEO MONITORING EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED BY
 11.8.8
  
 13. TWO-WAY RADIO ENHANCEMENT
  
 NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY
 RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.
 11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM
 RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
 COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL
 DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.
 NFPA 72, 24.5.2* TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS
 ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS.
 24.5.2.2 RADIO COVERAGE. RADIO COVERAGE SHALL BE
 PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE BUILDING AS A PERCENTAGE OF
 FLOOR AREA AS SPECIFIED IN 24.5.2.2.1 THROUGH
 24.5.2.2.3.
 24.5.2.2.1 CRITICAL AREAS. CRITICAL AREAS, SUCH AS THE
 EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER(S), THE FIRE PUMP ROOM(S),
 EXIT STAIRS, EXIT PASSAGEWAYS, ELEVATOR LOBBIES,
 STANDPIPE CABINETS, SPRINKLER SECTIONAL VALVE
 LOCATIONS, AND OTHER AREAS DEEMED CRITICAL BY THE
 AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH
 99 PERCENT FLOOR AREA RADIO COVERAGE.
 24.5.2.2.2 GENERAL BUILDING AREAS. GENERAL BUILDING
 AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH 90 PERCENT FLOOR AREA
 RADIO COVERAGE.
 24.5.2.3 SIGNAL STRENGTH.
 24.5.2.3.1 INBOUND. A MINIMUM INBOUND SIGNAL STRENGTH
 OF -95 DBM, OR OTHER SIGNAL STRENGTH AS REQUIRED BY THE
 AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL BE PROVIDED
 THROUGHOUT THE COVERAGE AREA.
 24.5.2.3.2 OUTBOUND. A MINIMUM OUTBOUND SIGNAL STRENGTH
 OF -95 DBM AT THE DONOR SITE, OR OTHER SIGNAL STRENGTH
 AS REQUIRED BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL
 BE PROVIDED FROM THE COVERAGE AREA.
  
 THE SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL
 STRENGTH USED BY WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE. TESTING
 SHALL BE BY AN ACCEPTABLE NATIONAL STANDARD DOCUMENTING
 PERCENTAGES NOTED ABOVE AND BY ACTUAL RADIO TESTING BY
 FIRE PERSONNEL. IF THE MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A
 BI-DIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH
 A MINIMUM 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP.
  
 PLEASE CONTACT MARK FILLA, PALM BEACH COUNTY PUBLIC
 SAFETY RADIO SYSTEMS MANAGER, [email protected],
 561-233-0837; AS OUR RADIOS OPERATE ON THEIR SYSTEM FOR
 DETAILED RADIO FREQUENCY AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.
  
  
 14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 BUILDING LOCATED AS DIRECTED BY THE AHJ,
  
 ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS,
 PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 15. THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA
 101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE PROTECTION
 EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING:
  
 THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED,
 INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204,
 STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY
 RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR
 RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY
 HAVING JURISDICTION.
 THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE
 INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE
 APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED
 MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE
 SYSTEM.
 ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL
 INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.9.
  
 16. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 17. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 11-10-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 11-10-2021 Time 12:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 11-10-2021 Time 12:10 Sent To  
Notes
2021-11-10 12:10:44FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: SCUBA CLUB RPD Z21050010
 NOVEMBER 10, 2021
  
 ANDREW BURNETT LANDSCAPE PLANNER 6/17/21
 561-822-1562
  
 1. SATISFIED. UNABLE TO SEE MEASUREMENTS OF LANDSCAPE
 BUFFER ON SOUTH SIDE IS REQUIRED SIZE. COULD NOT
 VERIFIED DIMENSIONS OF BUFFER. ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS
 SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF FIVE FEET WIDE.
 94-443 2 .A.
 2. SATISFIED. INCORPORATE SHADE TREES MISSING FROM WEST
 SIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER.
 AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE SHALL BE PLANTED
 IN A REQUIRED BUFFER FOR EACH 30 LINEAR FEET OR PORTION
 THEREOF. REQUIRED SHADE OR FLOWERING TREES MAY BE
 PLANTED AT INTERVALS OR MAY BE CLUSTERED IF CLUSTERING
 IMPROVES THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE BUFFER. REQUIRED
 TREES TO SERVE AS A LANDSCAPE BUFFER ADJACENT TO A
 RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT MUST BE VISIBLE FROM THE
 OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE WALL TO ENHANCE THE BUFFERING
 EFFECT. CLUSTERING OF REQUIRED TREES SHALL BE SUBJECT
 TO CITY APPROVAL. IF THERE IS ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE AREA
 ADJACENT TO THE BUFFER STRIP, REQUIRED TREES MAY BE
 PLACED ADJACENT TO THE BUFFER STRIP TO ALLOW A GREATER
 AREA FOR TREE DEVELOPMENT. 94-443 2. C
  
 3. SATISFIED. MINIMUM TREE SIZES ARE 12 FEET HEIGHT,
 CORRECT ON PLANT LIST. AMENITY DECK LIGUSTRUM TREES ARE
 REQUIRED AT 12 FEET HEIGHT. TREES ARE PROHIBITED FROM
 BEING TRIMMED INTO SHAPES AND MUST BE ALLOWED TO
 DEVELOP INTO THEIR MATURE SIZE TO FULFILL THE CODE
 REQUIREMENTS. PROVIDE REASON FOR SMALLER SIZES
  
  
 4. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. HEDGE MUST BE PROVIDED ON
 THE 3 NON ACCESS SIDES OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE.
 STAFF SUGGESTS THE ENCLOSURE BE REORIENTED TO ALLOW
 COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENT.
  
 5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 VALVES AND EQUIPMENT. LOCATION OF BACKFLOWS
 TRANSFORMERS COULD NOT BE FOUND IN PLAN.
  
  
 6. SATISFIED. INDICATE ON TREE DISPOSITION LOCATION OF
 #31 SEAGRAPE UNABLE TO LOCATION ON PLAN.
  
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/14/21:
 6. SATISFIED. ISPR 15-06 CONTAINED AN APPROVED TREE
 DISPOSITION PLAN SHEET TDP-1 DATED DECEMBER 2, 2015
 THAT SHOWED ADDITIONAL TREES AND PALMS ON THE SITE. IT
 APPEARS SOME HAVE BEEN REMOVED WITH DEMOLITION ON THE
 SITE. ADD ANY THAT WERE REMOVED TO THE CURRENT TREE
 DISPOSITION PLAN AND SHOW AS REMOVED.
  
 7. SATISFIED. BUFFER CALCULATIONS ON SHEET LP-3 NEED TO
 BE CORRECTED FOR:
 ? NORTH BUFFER TOTAL LENGTH 695 FT, 24 TREES REQUIRED,
 24 PROVIDED
 ? SOUTH BUFFER TOTAL LENGTH 648 FEET, 22 TREES
 REQUIRED, 27 PROVIDED
 ? EAST BUFFER TOTAL LENGTH AT SEAWALL 100 FEET, 4 TREES
 REQUIRED, 4 PROVIDED
  
 8. SATISFIED. PER COMMENT 7 ABOVE THE WAIVER REQUEST
 SHOULD BE MODIFIED TO INDICATE THE REQUIRED BUFFER IS
 PROVIDED AT THE SEAWALL NOT AT THE PROPERTY LINE
 BECAUSE OF SUBMERGED LAND.
  
 9. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE OVERALL LANDSCAPE
 REQUIREMENTS CHART ON SHEET LP-3:
 ? SHADE TREES 21 ARE REQUIRED.
 ? FLOWERING TREES 6 ARE REQUIRED
 ? MOVE MULTIFAMILY TREE REQUIREMENT OF 55 TO THIS
 CHART.
 ? TOTAL TREES REQUIRED IS 82, QUALIFYING PROVIDED ON
 PLANT LIST IS 41 TREES, 12 1:1 PALMS, 32 3:1 PALMS FOR
 A TOTAL OF 63.
 ? ADD RELOCATED PALMS TO PLANT LIST AND ADD TO
 QUALIFYING PALMS.
 ? REQUEST WAIVER IF THE TOTAL REQUIRED TREES CANNOT BE
 MET.
  
 10. SATISFIED. AFTER CORRECTIONS ARE MADE, RECALCULATE
 FLORIDA FRIENDLY QUALIFYING POINTS.
  
 11. SATISFIED. OFF SITE ROADWAY BEAUTIFICATION OF THE
 ROAD RIGHT OF WAY IS REQUIRED, AND THE EXISTING
 MAHOGANY TREE AND GREEN BUTTONWOOD TREE MUST BE
 INCLUDED ON THE TREE DISPOSITION LIST. THE OFFSITE
 TREES PROPOSED MUST BE SEPARATED ON THE PLANT LIST.
 SHADE TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR PROVIDING SHADE FOR
 PEDESTRIANS ON THE SIDEWALK. PROPOSE TREES APPROPRIATE
 FOR THE SPACE INSTEAD OF COCONUT PALMS.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. TREES IN THE
 RIGHT OF WAY ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY MUST BE INCLUDED
 IN THE PERMIT.
  
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
  
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
 4. PRIOR TO SCHEDULING FOR CITY COMMISSION, THE
 APPLICANT SHALL REDESIGN THE ENCLOSURE FOR THE DUMPSTER
 TO MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS INCLUDING THE REQUIRED HEDGE
 OR PROVIDE A MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR TRASH PICKUP.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-14-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 10-14-2021 Time 15:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 10-14-2021 Time 15:45 Sent To  
Notes
2021-10-14 15:46:20FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: SCUBA CLUB RPD Z21050010
 OCTOBER 14, 2021
  
 ANDREW BURNETT LANDSCAPE PLANNER 6/17/21
 561-822-1562
  
 1. SATISFIED. UNABLE TO SEE MEASUREMENTS OF LANDSCAPE
 BUFFER ON SOUTH SIDE IS REQUIRED SIZE. COULD NOT
 VERIFIED DIMENSIONS OF BUFFER. ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS
 SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF FIVE FEET WIDE.
 94-443 2 .A.
 2. SATISFIED. INCORPORATE SHADE TREES MISSING FROM WEST
 SIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER.
 AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE SHALL BE PLANTED
 IN A REQUIRED BUFFER FOR EACH 30 LINEAR FEET OR PORTION
 THEREOF. REQUIRED SHADE OR FLOWERING TREES MAY BE
 PLANTED AT INTERVALS OR MAY BE CLUSTERED IF CLUSTERING
 IMPROVES THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE BUFFER. REQUIRED
 TREES TO SERVE AS A LANDSCAPE BUFFER ADJACENT TO A
 RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT MUST BE VISIBLE FROM THE
 OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE WALL TO ENHANCE THE BUFFERING
 EFFECT. CLUSTERING OF REQUIRED TREES SHALL BE SUBJECT
 TO CITY APPROVAL. IF THERE IS ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE AREA
 ADJACENT TO THE BUFFER STRIP, REQUIRED TREES MAY BE
 PLACED ADJACENT TO THE BUFFER STRIP TO ALLOW A GREATER
 AREA FOR TREE DEVELOPMENT. 94-443 2. C
  
 3. SATISFIED. MINIMUM TREE SIZES ARE 12 FEET HEIGHT,
 CORRECT ON PLANT LIST. AMENITY DECK LIGUSTRUM TREES ARE
 REQUIRED AT 12 FEET HEIGHT. TREES ARE PROHIBITED FROM
 BEING TRIMMED INTO SHAPES AND MUST BE ALLOWED TO
 DEVELOP INTO THEIR MATURE SIZE TO FULFILL THE CODE
 REQUIREMENTS. PROVIDE REASON FOR SMALLER SIZES
  
  
 4. NOT SATISFIED HEDGE MUST BE PROVIDED ON THE 3 NON
 ACCESS SIDES OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE.
 STAFF SUGGESTS THE ENCLOSURE BE REORIENTED TO ALLOW
 COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENT.
  
 5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 VALVES AND EQUIPMENT. LOCATION OF BACKFLOWS
 TRANSFORMERS COULD NOT BE FOUND IN PLAN.
  
  
 6. SATISFIED. INDICATE ON TREE DISPOSITION LOCATION OF
 #31 SEAGRAPE UNABLE TO LOCATION ON PLAN.
  
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/14/21:
 6. ISPR 15-06 CONTAINED AN APPROVED TREE DISPOSITION
 PLAN SHEET TDP-1 DATED DECEMBER 2, 2015 THAT SHOWED
 ADDITIONAL TREES AND PALMS ON THE SITE. IT APPEARS SOME
 HAVE BEEN REMOVED WITH DEMOLITION ON THE SITE. ADD ANY
 THAT WERE REMOVED TO THE CURRENT TREE DISPOSITION PLAN
 AND SHOW AS REMOVED.
  
 7. BUFFER CALCULATIONS ON SHEET LP-3 NEED TO BE
 CORRECTED FOR:
 ? NORTH BUFFER TOTAL LENGTH 695 FT, 24 TREES REQUIRED,
 24 PROVIDED
 ? SOUTH BUFFER TOTAL LENGTH 648 FEET, 22 TREES
 REQUIRED, 27 PROVIDED
 ? EAST BUFFER TOTAL LENGTH AT SEAWALL 100 FEET, 4 TREES
 REQUIRED, 4 PROVIDED
  
 8. PER COMMENT 7 ABOVE THE WAIVER REQUEST SHOULD BE
 MODIFIED TO INDICATE THE REQUIRED BUFFER IS PROVIDED AT
 THE SEAWALL NOT AT THE PROPERTY LINE BECAUSE OF
 SUBMERGED LAND.
  
 9. CORRECT THE OVERALL LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CHART ON
 SHEET LP-3:
 ? SHADE TREES 21 ARE REQUIRED.
 ? FLOWERING TREES 6 ARE REQUIRED
 ? MOVE MULTIFAMILY TREE REQUIREMENT OF 55 TO THIS
 CHART.
 ? TOTAL TREES REQUIRED IS 82, QUALIFYING PROVIDED ON
 PLANT LIST IS 41 TREES, 12 1:1 PALMS, 32 3:1 PALMS FOR
 A TOTAL OF 63.
 ? ADD RELOCATED PALMS TO PLANT LIST AND ADD TO
 QUALIFYING PALMS.
 ? REQUEST WAIVER IF THE TOTAL REQUIRED TREES CANNOT BE
 MET.
  
 10. AFTER CORRECTIONS ARE MADE, RECALCULATE FLORIDA
 FRIENDLY QUALIFYING POINTS.
  
 11. OFF SITE ROADWAY BEAUTIFICATION OF THE ROAD RIGHT
 OF WAY IS REQUIRED, AND THE EXISTING MAHOGANY TREE AND
 GREEN BUTTONWOOD TREE MUST BE INCLUDED ON THE TREE
 DISPOSITION LIST. THE OFFSITE TREES PROPOSED MUST BE
 SEPARATED ON THE PLANT LIST. SHADE TREES ARE REQUIRED
 FOR PROVIDING SHADE FOR PEDESTRIANS ON THE SIDEWALK.
 PROPOSE TREES APPROPRIATE FOR THE SPACE INSTEAD OF
 COCONUT PALMS.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. TREES IN THE
 RIGHT OF WAY ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY MUST BE INCLUDED
 IN THE PERMIT.
  
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
  
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-09-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By aburnett Date 06-09-2021 Time 09:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aburnett Date 06-09-2021 Time 09:02 Sent To  
Notes
2021-06-09 09:04:521. UNABLE TO SEE MEASUREMENTS OF LANDSCAPE BUFFER ON
 SOUTH SIDE IS REQUIRED SIZE. COULD NOT VERIFIED
 DIMENSIONS OF BUFFER. ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS SHALL BE A
 MINIMUM OF FIVE FEET WIDE.
 94-443 2 .A.
 2. INCORPORATE SHADE TREES MISSING FROM WEST SIDE
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER.
 AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE SHALL BE PLANTED
 IN A REQUIRED BUFFER FOR EACH 30 LINEAR FEET OR PORTION
 THEREOF. REQUIRED SHADE OR FLOWERING TREES MAY BE
 PLANTED AT INTERVALS OR MAY BE CLUSTERED IF CLUSTERING
 IMPROVES THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE BUFFER. REQUIRED
 TREES TO SERVE AS A LANDSCAPE BUFFER ADJACENT TO A
 RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT MUST BE VISIBLE FROM THE
 OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE WALL TO ENHANCE THE BUFFERING
 EFFECT. CLUSTERING OF REQUIRED TREES SHALL BE SUBJECT
 TO CITY APPROVAL. IF THERE IS ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE AREA
 ADJACENT TO THE BUFFER STRIP, REQUIRED TREES MAY BE
 PLACED ADJACENT TO THE BUFFER STRIP TO ALLOW A GREATER
 AREA FOR TREE DEVELOPMENT. 94-443 2. C
  
 3. MINIMUM TREE SIZES ARE 12 FEET HEIGHT, CORRECT ON
 PLANT LIST. AMENITY DECK LIGUSTRUM TREES ARE REQUIRED
 AT 12 FEET HEIGHT. TREES ARE PROHIBITED FROM BEING
 TRIMMED INTO SHAPES AND MUST BE ALLOWED TO DEVELOP INTO
 THEIR MATURE SIZE TO FULFILL THE CODE REQUIREMENTS.
 PROVIDE REASON FOR SMALLER SIZES
  
  
 4. HEDGE MUST BE PROVIDED ON THE 3 NON ACCESS SIDES OF
 THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE.
  
 5. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED VALVES AND
 EQUIPMENT. LOCATION OF BACKFLOWS TRANSFORMERS COULD NOT
 BE FOUND IN PLAN.
  
  
 6. INDICATE ON TREE DISPOSITION LOCATION OF #31
 SEAGRAPE UNABLE TO LOCATION ON PLAN.
  
  
 FROM ANDREW BURNETT , LANDSCAPE PLANNDER 561-822-1562
 JUNE 9, 2021
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 2 Status P Date 10-05-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 10-05-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-10-05 14:58:11NO FURTHER COMMENTS.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 822-2045
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-07-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 06-07-2021 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 06-07-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-06-07 11:21:00PLEASE PROVIDE LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO
 REFLECT THE SOLID WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE
 SIZE, TYPE AND QUANTITY OF THE CONTAINERS (I.E.
 DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR) THAT WILL BE UTILIZED THAT WILL BE
 UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-15-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 10-15-2021 Time 04:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 10-15-2021 Time 04:33 Sent To  
Notes
2021-10-15 04:29:58THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 10/4/2021 SUBMITTAL:
  
 1. CONNECT ONSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO THE EXISTING STORM
 MANHOLE NEAR THE NORTH DRIVEWAY.
  
 2. JUSTIFY THE SIZE OF THE OUTFALL DRAINAGE PIPE.
  
 3. VERIFY THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE RUNOFF FROM THE
 DEVELOPMENT WILL NOT NEGATIVELY IMPACT THE ROADWAY
 DRAINAGE SYSTEM.
  
 4. INFORMATION SHOWN FOR EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM IN
 THE ROAD APPEARS TO BE IN A DIFFERENT VERTICAL DATUM.
 SUGGEST HAVING THE SURVEYOR OBTAIN FIELD MEASUREMENTS
 OF RIM ELEVATIONS AND INVERT ELEVATIONS BECAUSE THE
 CONVERSION FACTOR BETWEEN NAVD AND NGVD ON THE PLANS
 WHEN APPLIED TO THE CITY'S AS-BUILTS FOR THE POINSETTIA
 AVE PIPE REPLACEMENT PROJECT (PROJECT NO. 94441) DOES
 NOT PROVIDE THE SAME ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY. IT
 COULD BE THE CITY'S AS-BUILTS DID NOT USE NGVD1929 AS
 THE VERTICAL DATUM.
  
 5. TREES PROPOSED OVER OR NEAR PROPOSED EXFILTRATION
 TRENCH. SHOW PERIMETER SWALE ALONG NORTH AND SOUTH
 PROPERTY LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 6. INDICATE IF THE EXISTING STREET LIGHT NEAR THE
 PROPOSED NORTH DRIVEWAY WILL NEED TO BE RELOCATED.
  
 7. SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING: WILL ONE-WAY, DO NOT
 ENTER OR ENTER/EXIT SIGNS BE NEEDED AT THE DRIVEWAY
 ENTRANCES?
  
 8. CONFIRM THE DESIGN INFORMATION OF THE CONTROL
 STRUCTURE DETAIL. IT APPEARS TO BE FROM A DIFFERENT
 PROJECT.
  
 9. LIST THE VERTICAL DATUM REFERENCE AND CONVERSION TO
 NGVD1929 ON ALL SHEETS WITH ELEVATION INFORMATION.
  
 10. FOR SECTIONS A-A, B-B AND C-C:
 A. CONTINUE THE 1.5% OR STEEPER SLOPE UP TO THE
 PROPERTY LINE/RIGHT OF WAY LINE TO KEEP STORMWATER
 RUNOFF FROM THE RIGHT OF WAY FROM FLOWING INTO THE
 DEVELOPMENT.
 B. CONFIRM THE GRADES FOR THE TRAVEL LANE AND THAT THE
 ROAD HAS POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO A DRAINAGE STRUCTURE.
 C. WHAT IS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED PERIMETER ELEVATION?
  
 11. FOR SECTION D-D:
 A. SHOW RETAINING WALL AND ELEVATION OF THE TOP OF THE
 WALL.
 B. SHOW DISTANCE FROM PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF
 BUILDING.
 C. SHOW SIDEWALK AND DISTANCE FROM PROPERTY LINE TO
 FRONT OF SIDEWALK.
  
 12. EROSION CONTROL PLAN:
 A. RELOCATE THE ROCKED CONSTRUCTION DRIVEWAY OUTSIDE OF
 THE RIGHT OF WAY.
 B. PROVIDE INLET PROTECTION FOR THE ROAD DRAINAGE
 SYSTEM.
  
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-10-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 06-10-2021 Time 09:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 06-10-2021 Time 09:59 Sent To  
Notes
2021-06-10 09:55:12THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. PROJECT SITE IS WITHIN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA.
 DRAFT COASTAL FLOOD ZONE MAPS HAVE BEEN ISSUED BY FEMA
 THAT MAY SHOW A HIGHER BASE FLOOD ELEVATION THAN WHAT
 IS SHOWN ON THE CURRENT FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS. TWO
 FEET OF FREEBOARD ABOVE THE BFE WILL BE REQUIRED FOR
 THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION AND ANY
 MECHANICAL/ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT.
  
 2. PROPOSED EXFILTRATION TRENCH IS WITHIN FPL EASEMENT.
 APPROVAL FROM FPL MAY BE NEEDED.
  
 3. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FOR EACH DRIVEWAY AND MIDWAY
 BETWEEN DRIVEWAYS FROM CENTERLINE OF ROAD TO 10 FEET
 WITHIN THE PROPERTY.
  
 4. PROVIDE TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS AT NORTH AND SOUTH
 PROPERTY LINES FROM PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING.
  
 5. PROPERTY CANNOT DRAIN ONTO ADJACENT PARCELS.
  
 6. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP
 CRITERIA AND CONSIDER SEA LEVEL RISE. THE DESIGN OF THE
 EXFILTRATION TRENCH SHOULD CONSIDER THE IMPACTS THE
 PERIMETER WALL AND THE BUILDING WILL HAVE ON THE FLOW
 RATE OF THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH.
  
 7. PROVIDE FLOW ARROWS ON THE PGD PLAN SHOWING
 DIRECTION OF SURFACE RUNOFF.
  
 8. CONSIDER SEA LEVEL RISE IN THE DESIGN OF THE
 PROPOSED BULKHEAD.
  
 9. CITY CODE PROHIBITS NEW DRAINAGE OUTFALLS INTO THE
 LAKE WORTH LAGOON.
  
 10. SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 11. DECKING SHOWN ON THE CIVIL PLANS DOES NOT MATCH
 WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
  
 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED
 WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 3. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP PERMIT(S) BEFORE START OF
 CONSTRUCTION.
  
 4. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WITH THE
 ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 10-14-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 10-14-2021 Time 07:12 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-10-14 07:14:091. NEED SIGNED COPY OF SURVEY.
 2. REPLAT AND UTILITY EASEMENT REQUIRED PRIOR TO CO.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-07-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 06-07-2021 Time 08:08 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-06-07 08:18:091. REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED. MINOR SUBDIVISION
 APPLICATION IS MADE THROUGH PLANNING.
 2. FPL WILL NEED TO APPROVE TREES IN THEIR EASEMENT.
 3. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR
 IMPROVEMENTS IN FLAGLER DRIVE.
 4. WILL NEED SEPARATE APPLICATION FOR EXISTING DOCK
 DEMOLITION AND NEW DOCK CONSTRUCTION.
 5. SEE ENGINEERING COMMENTS FOR WATER AND SEWER
 HOOK-UPS.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-15-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 10-15-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-10-15 17:53:221) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
 2) NOT SATISFIED. AUTOTURN SHOWS PARTIAL ENCROACHMENT.
 CONSIDER WIDENING THE INTERNAL DRIVE AISLE OR INCREASE
 CURB TURNING RADIUS. REVISE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS
 ACCORDINGLY. LATEST RESUBMISSION DID NOT PROVIDE
 UPDATED DRAWINGS
 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN SHOWCASING A VEHICLE
 TURNING FROM THE VALET AISLE TO THE GARAGE
 4) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE CIVIL ENGINEERING GARAGE
 PLANS WITH DIMENSIONS
 5) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE SITE PARKING TABLE
 6) A VARIANCE REQUEST MUST BE SUBMITTED PERTAINING
 NUMBER OF DRIVEWAYS OR THEIR WIDTH. CITY CODE SECTION
 94-312-1(A) ALLOWS ONLY ONE ACCESS POINT FOR
 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS WITH LESS THAN 75 UNITS. PART
 (C)2 ALLOWS A CIRCULAR DRIVEWAY PROVIDED THAT EACH
 DRIVEWAY OPENING SHALL NOT EXCEED TEN FEET IN WIDTH AT
 THE PROPERTY LINE OR WHERE THE DRIVEWAY OPENING ADJOINS
 THE APRON IF THE APRON IS NOT LOCATED WHOLLY WITHIN THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-10-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 06-10-2021 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-06-10 01:49:55TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
  
 SITE COMMENTS
 2) AUTOTURN SHOWS PARTIAL ENCROACHMENT. CONSIDER
 WIDENING THE INTERNAL DRIVE AISLE OR INCREASE CURB
 TURNING RADIUS. REVISE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS ACCORDINGLY
 3) PROVIDE AUTOTURN SHOWCASING A VEHICLE TURNING FROM
 THE VALET AISLE TO THE GARAGE
 4) PROVIDE GARAGE PLANS
 5) PROVIDE SITE PARKING TABLE
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-14-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 10-14-2021 Time 09:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 10-14-2021 Time 09:47 Sent To  
Notes
2021-10-14 14:27:01PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 PROJECT NO.: Z21050010
 CASE NO.: PB 1887
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. [ SATISFIED ] - APPROVED SCHOOL CAPACITY
 AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION (SCAD) SHALL BE PROVIDED
 FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT. THE SCAD
 SHALL INCLUDE APPROVAL FOR THE REZONING, AS WELL AS THE
 DEVELOPMENT ORDER (ACTUAL PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT). AN
 UNSIGNED ELECTRONIC FORM WAS INCLUDED IN YOUR
 SUBMITTAL, BUT IT WAS NOT SIGNED BY THE OWNER/AGENT. IF
 THIS IS THE VERSION THAT YOU ARE REQUESTING THE CITY TO
 SIGN BEFORE SUBMITTAL TO THE SCHOOL DISTRICT, IT NEEDS
 TO FIRST BE SIGNED BY THE OWNER/AGENT.
  
 2. [ STAFF ACKNOWLEDGES THE EFFORTS THAT WERE MADE TO
 ADDRESS THE CONCERNS LISTED BELOW ? 2.1 THROUGH 2.4 -
 AND HAS NO COMMENTS AT THIS TIME BUT IS CONTINUING TO
 REVIEW THE ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL THAT WAS
 PROVIDED ] - THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS SIGNIFICANT
 CONCERNS WITH REGARD TO:
  
 2.1. THE SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF WAIVER REQUESTS WITH
 LITTLE TO NO INDICATION OF HOW THE IMPACTS OF THOSE
 WAIVERS ARE BEING MITIGATED.
  
 2.2. NO INDICATION ON HOW THE PUBLIC IS TO BENEFIT FROM
 THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND THE
 ASSOCIATED WAIVERS. PURSUANT TO THE CITY'S ZLDRS,
 PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS ARE PERMITTED TO ENCOURAGE "THE
 USE OF INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
 TECHNIQUES TO CREATE A MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE
 DEVELOPMENT". WHAT INNOVATIVE TECHNIQUES ARE BEING
 UTILIZED? HOW ARE THE BENEFITS MENTIONED IN YOUR
 JUSTIFICATION ANY DIFFERENT (OR BETTER) THAN WHAT WOULD
 RESULT FROM A PROJECT THAT CONFORMS TO THE CURRENT
 ZONING DISTRICT?
  
 2.3. THE CONFIGURATION OF THE FRONT OF THE PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING CIRCULATION PATTERN AND OPERATION WITH THE
 GATE/VALET/ETC. AND AMOUNT OF SPACE DEDICATED TO
 VEHICULAR MOVEMENTS.
  
 2.4. LACK OF "ACTIVE" USE ALONG THE FLAGLER DRIVE
 STREET FRONTAGE, INCLUDING THE AMOUNT OF AREA DEDICATED
 TO VEHICULAR USE ON THE GROUND FLOOR, THE PARKING
 GARAGE ON THE UPPER FLOORS, ETC.
  
 3. [ SATISFIED ] - IN MULTIPLE LOCATIONS
 (JUSTIFICATION, SITE PLAN, ETC.) THERE IS REFERENCE TO
 A WAIVING THE LOT WIDTH REQUIREMENT IN TABLE XIII-1;
 TABLE XIII-1 PERTAINS TO SIGN REGULATIONS. I BELIEVE
 YOU ARE INTENDING TO REFERENCE TABLE VIII-1. PLEASE
 ENSURE THAT ALL CODE CITATIONS, ETC. ARE REFERENCED
 CORRECTLY.
  
 4. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - PAGE 3 OF THE JUSTIFICATION
 STATEMENT INDICATES THAT THREE (3) WAIVERS ARE BEING
 REQUESTED, BUT THE PLANS INDICATED SEVEN (7). PLEASE
 ENSURE THAT ALL DOCUMENTS AND PLANS ARE CONSISTENT AND
 ACCURATE.
  
 4.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - THROUGHOUT THE JUSTIFICATION
 STATEMENT IT INDICATES THAT SIX (6) WAIVERS ARE BEING
 REQUESTED, BUT THE PLANS CONTINUE TO INDICATE SEVEN (7)
 WAIVERS. PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL DOCUMENTS AND PLANS ARE
 CONSISTENT AND ACCURATE.
  
 5. [ SATISFIED ] - THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT CONTAINS
 MULTIPLE SPELLING AND GRAMMATICAL ERRORS. PLEASE
 CORRECT.
  
 6. [ SATISFIED ] - PAGE 4 OF THE JUSTIFICATION
 STATEMENT INDICATES THAT THE MARINA PROJECT IS APPROVED
 FOR 1,050 UNITS; PLEASE NOTE THAT 1,059 UNITS ARE
 APPROVED.
  
 7. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - PAGE 4 OF THE JUSTIFICATION
 STATEMENT INDICATES THAT THE PROPOSED DOCK HAS BEEN
 APPROVED BY THE FDEP AND THE ARMY CORPS; COPIES OF
 THOSE APPROVALS ARE REQUESTED.
  
 7.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - ON PAGE 2 OF 10 OF THE FDEP
 APPROVAL, IT INDICATES THAT FEDERAL AUTHORIZATION
 EXPIRED ON 7/25/2016.
  
 7.2 [ NEW COMMENT ] - EXHIBIT A OF THE FDEP APPROVAL
 INDICATES THAT THE TIME LIMIT FOR COMPLETING THE WORK
 AUTHORIZED ENDS ON 7/25/2016.
  
 8. [ SATISFIED ] - PAGES 4 AND 9 OF THE JUSTIFICATION
 STATEMENT MAKE REFERENCE TO SEC. 94-243, TABLE VIII-3
 OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS; THIS SECTION OF THE CODE IS THE
 SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL
 DISTRICTS. PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL CODE CITATIONS, ETC.
 ARE REFERENCED CORRECTLY.
  
 9. [ SATISFIED ] - PAGE 5 OF THE JUSTIFICATION
 STATEMENT MAKES REFERENCE TO THE REQUIRED BUILDING
 COVERAGE, OPEN SPACE, PERVIOUS AREA, ETC.; PLEASE NOTE
 THAT RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS DO NOT HAVE THESE
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 10. [ SATISFIED ] - THE FRONT SETBACKS (BOTH REQUIRED
 AND PROPOSED) SHOWN ON PAGE 5 OF THE JUSTIFICATION
 STATEMENT IS INCORRECT. PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL DATA IS
 CORRECT.
  
 11. [ SATISFIED ] - THE CODE REQUIREMENTS SHOWN IN THE
 TABLE "SCUBA CLUB PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS" ON
 SHEET SP-1 ARE INCORRECT.
  
 12. [ SATISFIED ] - PAGE 10 OF THE JUSTIFICATION
 STATEMENT INDICATES THAT SEC. 94-207(C)(4) REQUIRES THE
 2:1 RATIO FOR SETBACKS VS. BUILDING HEIGHT; THIS IS
 INCORRECT.
  
 13. [ SATISIFED ] - PAGE 11 OF THE JUSTIFICATION
 STATEMENT MAKES REFERENCE TO SEC. 94-243(D)(2)(A) OF
 THE CITY'S ZLDRS; THIS CODE SECTION DOES NOT EXIST.
 PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL CODE CITATIONS, ETC. ARE
 REFERENCED CORRECTLY.
  
 14. [ SATISFIED ] - AS REQUIRED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION, THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
 SHALL BE PROVIDED IN MICROSOFT WORK, OR COMPATIBLE,
 FORMAT.
  
 15. [ SATISFIED ] - THE OWNER'S CONSENT FORM LISTS THE
 OWNER AS "SCUBA CLUB MANAGER, LLC", BUT THE WARRANTY
 DEED PROVIDED INDICATES THAT THE OWNER IS "SCUBA CLUB
 WPB, LLC". PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE CORRECT OWNER IS
 LISTED.
  
 16. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - ALL OF THE REQUIRED
 PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 16.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - COMCAST LETTER SHALL BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 17. [ SATISFIED ] - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-312(1)(A) OF
 THE CITY'S ZLDRS, RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS WITH 75
 UNITS OR LESS ARE ONLY PERMITTED ONE (1) ACCESS POINT.
 ADDITIONALLY, IF MULTIPLE ACCESS POINTS WERE PROVIDED,
 SEC. 94-312(2)(A) OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS REQUIRES THAT
 ACCESS POINTS HAVE A MINIMUM SEPARATION DISTANCE OF AT
 LEAST 125 FEET ON A NON-THOROUGHFARE ROADWAY.
  
 18. [ SATISFIED ] - THE LANDSCAPING SHOWN ON SHEET R7
 DOES NOT ACCURATELY REFLECT WHAT IS PROPOSED IN THE
 SUBMITTED LANDSCAPE PLANS. ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS
 ACCURATELY MATCH WHAT IS PROPOSED.
  
 19. [ SATISFIED ] - THE LABELING OF THE "GUARD HOUSE"
 ON SHEET R7 IS PLACED INCORRECTLY.
  
 20. [ SATISFIED ] - THE SETBACK LINE ON THE
 ARCHITECTURAL PLANS APPEAR TO BE IN THE WRONG LOCATION,
 SPECIFICALLY THE FRONT SETBACK.
  
 21. [ SATISFIED ] - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-71(D)(2)(A) OF
 THE CITY'S ZLDRS, LOT WIDTHS ON THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH
 FLAGLER DRIVE ARE TO COMPLY WITH SEC. 94-77(A)(1)(L),
 WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH OF 75 FEET. MANY OF
 YOUR PLANS/DOCUMENTS REFERENCE A REQUIRED LOT WIDTH OF
 50 FEET; PLEASE ADJUST ACCORDINGLY.
  
 22. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - IT WAS INDICATED THAT
 BIKE PARKING IS BEING PROVIDED FOR EIGHT (8) BICYCLES.
 THE ONLY INFORMATION ON THE PLANS INDICATING ANY
 BICYCLE FACILITIES HAS BEEN THE BIKE STORAGE ROOM:
  
 22.1. [ SATISFIED ] - PLEASE INDICATE THE LAYOUT OF THE
 FACILITIES IN THIS ROOM TO ENSURE THAT A SUFFICIENT
 NUMBER OF FACILITIES ARE BEING PROVIDED.
  
 22.2. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - ADDITIONAL FACILITIES
 SHALL BE PROVIDED THAT ARE ACCESSIBLE TO GUESTS, ETC.
 THAT MAY NOT HAVE ACCESS TO THE BIKE STORAGE ROOM.
  
 22.2.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] ? A DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR
 THE BIKE RACKS LOCATED BEHIND THE VALET STATION AND
 SUCH RACKS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY?S DESIGN
 REQUIREMENTS, SPACING, ETC.
  
 22.3. [ SATISFIED ] - THE SITE PLAN APPEARS TO SHOW
 STEPS FROM THE ADJACENT WALKWAY INTO BOTH THE BIKE
 STORAGE AS WELL AS STAIR 3, ETC. THESE ARE NOT SHOWN ON
 THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. IF STEPS ARE BEING PROVIDED,
 PLEASE ENSURE THAT THIS IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE ADA
 ACCESSIBLE.
  
 23. [ SATISFIED ] - THE WAIVER REGARDING THE HEIGHT OF
 THE BUILDING RELATIVE TO THE SETBACKS SHOULD BE
 EXPRESSED AS A WAIVER TO THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT
 PERMITTED. THE REFERENCE TO THE SETBACK CAN ALSO BE
 PROVIDED, BUT THE WAIVER TO THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT SHALL BE
 EXPRESSLY INDICATED.
  
 24. [ SATISFIED ] - THE SETBACK SHALL BE INDICATED FOR
 THE MONUMENT SIGN. PER SEC. 94-407(2) OF THE CITY'S
 ZLDRS, THE SIGN SHALL BE 20 FEET FROM AN ADJACENT
 PROPERTY, AND 20 FEET FROM THE RIGHT-OF-WAY IF PLACED
 PERPENDICULAR TO THE STREET.
  
 25. [ SATISFIED ] - THE HEIGHT OF THE FREESTANDING SIGN
 SHALL BE INDICATED. PER SEC. 94-207(2) OF THE CITY'S
 ZLDRS, THE SIGN SHALL NOT EXCEED FOUR (4) FEET IN
 HEIGHT.
  
 26. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - PLEASE PROVIDE CROSS
 SECTION (WITH CORRECT ELEVATIONS) SHOWING THE AREA FROM
 THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE TO THE BUILDING, INCLUDING THE
 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PROPOSED RETAINING WALL, THE
 PROPERTY LINE, THE EXISTING CONCRETE WALL, ETC.
  
 26.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] ? IN THE CROSS SECTIONS, PLEASE
 PROVIDE THE ELEVATION POINTS FOR THE TOP OF THE
 RETAINING WALL.
  
 26.2 [ NEW COMMENT ] ? ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE
 BUILDING THE CROSS SECTION IN THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
 SHOW THE SITE SLOPING TOWARD THE ADJACENT PROPERTY,
 WITH ALL RUNOFF LEAVING THE SITE ONTO THE ADJACENT
 PROPERTY; THE CIVIL PLANS INDICATE WHAT APPEARS TO BE A
 SWALE BEFORE THE PROPERTY LINE. PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL
 PLANS ARE CONSISTENT.
  
 27. [ SATISFIED ] - ALL SETBACKS NEED TO BE MEASURED
 FROM THE PROPERTY LINE TO THE CLOSEST POINT OF THE
 STRUCTURE. IT APPEARS THAT THAT AT LEASE THE REAR
 SETBACK IS NOT MEASURED TO THE CLOSEST POINT AS THERE
 ARE STRUCTURAL WALLS, COLUMNS, ETC. THAT ARE CLOSER TO
 THE PROPERTY LINE AND ARE NOT BEING ACCOUNTED FOR.
  
 28. [ SATISFIED ] - DATA TABLE NEEDS TO INDICATE THE
 NUMBER OF COMPACT PARKING SPACES AND INDICATE
 COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. 94-485(N)(1) OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS.
  
 29. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - TURNAROUND SPACES SHALL
 BE PROVIDED AT EACH DEAD-END PARKING AREA.
  
 29.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] ? THE TURNAROUND AREA AT THE TOP
 OF THE 5TH FLOOR NEEDS TO BE STRIPED OUT AS NO PARKING.
  
 30. DETAILS SHALL BE PROVIDED SHOWING THE PROPOSED
 SCREENING METHODS FOR THE PARKING GARAGE, INCLUDING HOW
 VEHICLE LIGHTS WILL BE BLOCKED FROM IMPACTING THE
 ADJACENT PROPERTIES, ETC.
  
 31. [ SATISFIED ] - ADDITIONAL DETAIL NEEDS TO BE
 PROVIDED ON THE ROOF PLAN/ELEVATIONS TO INDICATE WHY
 THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING IS MEASURED AT 235' 2" AND
 NOT 244' 2". IS THE AREA ABOVE 235? 2? ENCLOSED, OR IS
 IT A SCREEN WALL/PARAPET?
  
 32. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - THE SITE DATA TABLE NEEDS
 TO INDICATE THE AREA ASSOCIATED WITH THE SUBMERGED
 LANDS AND INDICATE HOW THE DENSITY COMPLIES WITH SEC.
 94-309(F)(3) OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS. NOTE THAT PURSUANT TO
 SEC. 94-309(F)(2) OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS, "A STATEMENT
 CONCURRENT WITH LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION OR
 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION, IN A FORM ACCEPTABLE TO
 THE CITY ATTORNEY, THAT AN APPLICATION TO FILL AND
 UTILIZE SUBMERGED LANDS WILL NOT BE FILLED FOLLOWING
 APPROVAL OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT OR
 ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT."
  
 32.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED
 REGARDING THE DENSITY CALCULATION AND AN ADDITIONAL
 WAIVER HAS BEEN ADDED TO INCREASE THE DENSITY
 ASSOCIATED WITH THE SUBMERGED LANDS. PURSUANT TO SEC.
 94-309(F)(4) OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS, PROPOERTIES MUST HAVE
 AN "AGGREGATE OF UPLAND AND SUBMERGED ACREAGE OF TWO
 ACRES OR MORE" TO APPLY FOR A PD IN ORDER TO INCREASE
 THE UTILIZATION OF SUBMERGED LAND.
  
 33. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - PURSUANT TO SEC.
 94-313(A) OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS, THE FOLLOWING
 INFORMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE DOCK IF IT IS TO
 BE INCLUDED IN THIS APPLICATION:
  
 33.1. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - A CROSS SECTION SHOWING
 ALL ELEMENTS OF THE PROPOSED DOCK, BOTTOM OF THE
 WATERWAY, MEAN HIGH WATER, BULKHEAD, ETC. SHALL BE
 PROVIDED. NO PORTION OF THE DOCK SHALL EXTEND ABOVE THE
 HEIGHT OF THE BULKHEAD WITH THE EXCEPTION OF SECURITY
 FENCES, BOAT LIFTS, AND MOORING DEVICES.
  
 33.1.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - ARE THE 2015 PLANS PREPARED BY
 ISIMINGER & STUBBS BEING UTILIZED TO PROVIDE DETAIL
 REGARDING THE DOCK? THESE PLANS DO NOT COMPLETELY MATCH
 WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED CURRENTLY. ALL 2015 PLANS NEEDS
 TO BE UPDATED AND ALL PLANS NEED TO BE CONSISTENT.
  
 33.2. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - A STUDY SHOWING THAT
 MARINE GRASSES, ETC. ARE NOT BEING IMPACTED BY THE
 PROPOSED DOCK CONSTRUCTION.
  
 33.2.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - ARE THE 2015 PLAN PREPARED BY
 ISIMINGER & STUBBS BEING UTILIZED TO PROVIDE DETAIL
 REGARDING THE DOCK CONSTRUCTION? ALL 2015 PLANS NEEDS
 TO BE UPDATED AND ALL PLANS NEED TO BE CONSISTENT.
  
 33.3. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - THE DISTANCE FROM THE END OF
 THE PROPOSED DOCK TO THE NAVIGABLE CHANNEL.
  
 33.4. [ SATISFIED ] - A NOTATION SHALL BE MADE
 INDICATING THAT ALL SLIPS WITH BE PROVIDED WITH
 APPROPRIATE WATER AND ELECTRICAL SERVICE.
  
 33.5. [ SATISFIED ] - AT LEAST ONE LADDER SHALL BE
 PROVIDED FOR EACH DOCK, EXTENDING FROM THE DOCK SURFACE
 TO 2 FEET BELOW MEAN LOW WATER.
  
 33.6. [ SATISFIED ] - WATER-RESISTANT REFLECTIVE NUMBER
 SHALL E PROVIDED ON THE END OF THE DOCK, VISIBLE FROM
 THE WATERWAY, CORRESPONDING TO THE STREET ADDRESS.
  
 34. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - PLEASE CLARIFY WHAT
 APPEAR TO BE PILINGS LOCATED OUTSIDE THE MIDDLE 1/3 OF
 THE LOT. ALL PILINGS, MOORING RELATED FACILITIES, ETC.
 SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE MIDDLE 1/3 OF THE LOT,
 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 94-313(A)(3)(H) OF THE CITY'S
 ZLDRS.
  
 34.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - ARE THE 2015 PLANS PREPARED BY
 ISIMINGER & STUBBS BEING UTILIZED TO PROVIDE DETAIL
 REGARDING THE DOCK CONSTRUCTION? THESE PLANS DO NOT
 COMPLETELY MATCH WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED CURRENTLY. THE
 DOCK PLAN ON SHEET SP-1 DOES NOT SHOW ANY MOORING
 PILINGS. LOCATIONS OF ALL MOORING FACILITIES, BOAT
 LIFTS, ETC. NEED TO BE SHOWN TO ENSURE PLACEMENT WITHIN
 THE REQUIRED SETBACKS. ALL 2015 PLANS NEEDS TO BE
 UPDATED AND ALL PLANS NEED TO BE CONSISTENT.
  
 35. [ SATISFIED ] - THE DOCK PLATFORM ADJACENT TO THE
 SEAWALL APPEARS TO BE ENCROACHING OUTSIDE THE MIDDLE
 1/3 OF THE LOT. ADDITIONALLY, THE PLATFORM SHOWN ON THE
 SITE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THAT WHICH IS SHOWN ON THE
 CIVIL PLANS. ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS ARE CONSISTENT AND
 ACCURATE.
  
 36. [ SATISFIED ] - PURSUANT TO SEC.
 94-313(A)(3)(G)(II) OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS, DOCKS
 CONTAINING FOUR OR MORE MOORING SLIPS SHALL PROVIDE
 SANITARY SEWER PUMP OUT FACILITIES ON THE FOLLOWING
 BASIS: ONE SANITARY SEWER PUMP OUT RECEPTACLE FOR EVERY
 EIGHT MOORING SLIPS OR FRACTION THEREOF, OR APPROPRIATE
 CONNECTIONS TO EACH MOORING SLIP.
  
 37. [ NEW COMMENT [ - PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS REGARDING
 THE GREEN WALL ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY
 (HEIGHT OF THE WALL, ETC.) AS WELL AS THE HEIGHT OF THE
 KNEE WALL THAT IS PROPOSED ALONG THE FRONT OF THE
 PROPERTY.
  
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) ELECTRONIC COPIES OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS
 SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE NOVEMBER 16, 2021,
 PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE
 SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED
 DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN MONDAY, OCTOBER 25, 2021.
  
 G) TO BE PLACED ON THE NOVEMBER 16, 2021, PLANNING
 BOARD AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO
 LATER THAN NOVEMBER 1, 2021. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM, AND
 BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
 CITY?S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; SUCH
 REQUIREMENTS ARE ALSO PROVIDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE
 PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED ABOVE.
  
 H) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT
 DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE
 COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-20-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 07-20-2021 Time 09:15 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 07-20-2021 Time 09:15 Sent To  
Notes
2021-07-20 09:16:05PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 PROJECT NO.: Z21050010
 CASE NO.: PB 1887
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. APPROVED SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION
 (SCAD) SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY
 SCHOOL DISTRICT. THE SCAD SHALL INCLUDE APPROVAL FOR
 THE REZONING, AS WELL AS THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER (ACTUAL
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT). AN UNSIGNED ELECTRONIC FORM WAS
 INCLUDED IN YOUR SUBMITTAL, BUT IT WAS NOT SIGNED BY
 THE OWNER/AGENT. IF THIS IS THE VERSION THAT YOU ARE
 REQUESTING THE CITY TO SIGN BEFORE SUBMITTAL TO THE
 SCHOOL DISTRICT, IT NEEDS TO FIRST BE SIGNED BY THE
 OWNER/AGENT.
  
 2. THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS SIGNIFICANT CONCERNS WITH
 REGARD TO:
  
 2.1. THE SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF WAIVER REQUESTS WITH
 LITTLE TO NO INDICATION OF HOW THE IMPACTS OF THOSE
 WAIVERS ARE BEING MITIGATED.
  
 2.2. NO INDICATION ON HOW THE PUBLIC IS TO BENEFIT FROM
 THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND THE
 ASSOCIATED WAIVERS. PURSUANT TO THE CITY'S ZLDRS,
 PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS ARE PERMITTED TO ENCOURAGE "THE
 USE OF INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
 TECHNIQUES TO CREATE A MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE
 DEVELOPMENT". WHAT INNOVATIVE TECHNIQUES ARE BEING
 UTILIZED? HOW ARE THE BENEFITS MENTIONED IN YOUR
 JUSTIFICATION ANY DIFFERENT (OR BETTER) THAN WHAT WOULD
 RESULT FROM A PROJECT THAT CONFORMS TO THE CURRENT
 ZONING DISTRICT?
  
 2.3. THE CONFIGURATION OF THE FRONT OF THE PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING CIRCULATION PATTERN AND OPERATION WITH THE
 GATE/VALET/ETC. AND AMOUNT OF SPACE DEDICATED TO
 VEHICULAR MOVEMENTS.
  
 2.4. LACK OF "ACTIVE" USE ALONG THE FLAGLER DRIVE
 STREET FRONTAGE, INCLUDING THE AMOUNT OF AREA DEDICATED
 TO VEHICULAR USE ON THE GROUND FLOOR, THE PARKING
 GARAGE ON THE UPPER FLOORS, ETC.
  
 3. IN MULTIPLE LOCATIONS (JUSTIFICATION, SITE PLAN,
 ETC.) THERE IS REFERENCE TO A WAIVING THE LOT WIDTH
 REQUIREMENT IN TABLE XIII-1; TABLE XIII-1 PERTAINS TO
 SIGN REGULATIONS. I BELIEVE YOU ARE INTENDING TO
 REFERENCE TABLE VIII-1. PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL CODE
 CITATIONS, ETC. ARE REFERENCED CORRECTLY.
  
 4. PAGE 3 OF THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INDICATES THAT
 THREE (3) WAIVERS ARE BEING REQUESTED, BUT THE PLANS
 INDICATED SEVEN (7). PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL DOCUMENTS
 AND PLANS ARE CONSISTENT AND ACCURATE.
  
 5. THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT CONTAINS MULTIPLE
 SPELLING AND GRAMMATICAL ERRORS. PLEASE CORRECT.
  
 6. PAGE 4 OF THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INDICATES THAT
 THE MARINA PROJECT IS APPROVED FOR 1,050 UNITS; PLEASE
 NOTE THAT 1,059 UNITS ARE APPROVED.
  
 7. PAGE 4 OF THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INDICATES THAT
 THE PROPOSED DOCK HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE FDEP AND THE
 ARMY CORPS; COPIES OF THOSE APPROVALS ARE REQUESTED.
  
 8. PAGES 4 AND 9 OF THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT MAKE
 REFERENCE TO SEC. 94-243, TABLE VIII-3 OF THE CITY'S
 ZLDRS; THIS SECTION OF THE CODE IS THE SCHEDULE OF
 DISTRICT REGULATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS. PLEASE
 ENSURE THAT ALL CODE CITATIONS, ETC. ARE REFERENCED
 CORRECTLY.
  
 9. PAGE 5 OF THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT MAKES
 REFERENCE TO THE REQUIRED BUILDING COVERAGE, OPEN
 SPACE, PERVIOUS AREA, ETC.; PLEASE NOTE THAT
 RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS DO NOT HAVE THESE
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 10. THE FRONT SETBACKS (BOTH REQUIRED AND PROPOSED)
 SHOWN ON PAGE 5 OF THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT IS
 INCORRECT. PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL DATA IS CORRECT.
  
 11. THE CODE REQUIREMENTS SHOWN IN THE TABLE "SCUBA
 CLUB PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS" ON SHEET SP-1
 ARE INCORRECT.
  
 12. PAGE 10 OF THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INDICATES
 THAT SEC. 94-207(C)(4) REQUIRES THE 2:1 RATIO FOR
 SETBACKS VS. BUILDING HEIGHT; THIS IS INCORRECT.
  
 13. PAGE 11 OF THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT MAKES
 REFERENCE TO SEC. 94-243(D)(2)(A) OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS;
 THIS CODE SECTION DOES NOT EXIST. PLEASE ENSURE THAT
 ALL CODE CITATIONS, ETC. ARE REFERENCED CORRECTLY.
  
 14. AS REQUIRED BY THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION, THE
 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY SHALL BE PROVIDED IN
 MICROSOFT WORK, OR COMPATIBLE, FORMAT.
  
 15. THE OWNER'S CONSENT FORM LISTS THE OWNER AS "SCUBA
 CLUB MANAGER, LLC", BUT THE WARRANTY DEED PROVIDED
 INDICATES THAT THE OWNER IS "SCUBA CLUB WPB, LLC".
 PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE CORRECT OWNER IS LISTED.
  
 16. ALL OF THE REQUIRED PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 17. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-312(1)(A) OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS,
 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS WITH 75 UNITS OR LESS ARE ONLY
 PERMITTED ONE (1) ACCESS POINT. ADDITIONALLY, IF
 MULTIPLE ACCESS POINTS WERE PROVIDED, SEC. 94-312(2)(A)
 OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS REQUIRES THAT ACCESS POINTS HAVE A
 MINIMUM SEPARATION DISTANCE OF AT LEAST 125 FEET ON A
 NON-THOROUGHFARE ROADWAY.
  
 18. THE LANDSCAPING SHOWN ON SHEET R7 DOES NOT
 ACCURATELY REFLECT WHAT IS PROPOSED IN THE SUBMITTED
 LANDSCAPE PLANS. ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS ACCURATELY MATCH
 WHAT IS PROPOSED.
  
 19. THE LABELING OF THE "GUARD HOUSE" ON SHEET R7 IS
 PLACED INCORRECTLY.
  
 20. THE SETBACK LINE ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS APPEAR
 TO BE IN THE WRONG LOCATION, SPECIFICALLY THE FRONT
 SETBACK.
  
 21. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-71(D)(2)(A) OF THE CITY'S
 ZLDRS, LOT WIDTHS ON THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH FLAGLER
 DRIVE ARE TO COMPLY WITH SEC. 94-77(A)(1)(L), WHICH
 REQUIRES A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH OF 75 FEET. MANY OF YOUR
 PLANS/DOCUMENTS REFERENCE A REQUIRED LOT WIDTH OF 50
 FEET; PLEASE ADJUST ACCORDINGLY.
  
 22. IT WAS INDICATED THAT BIKE PARKING IS BEING
 PROVIDED FOR EIGHT (8) BICYCLES. THE ONLY INFORMATION
 ON THE PLANS INDICATING ANY BICYCLE FACILITIES HAS BEEN
 THE BIKE STORAGE ROOM:
  
 22.1. PLEASE INDICATE THE LAYOUT OF THE FACILITIES IN
 THIS ROOM TO ENSURE THAT A SUFFICIENT NUMBER OF
 FACILITIES ARE BEING PROVIDED.
  
 22.2. ADDITIONAL FACILITIES SHALL BE PROVIDED THAT ARE
 ACCESSIBLE TO GUESTS, ETC. THAT MAY NOT HAVE ACCESS TO
 THE BIKE STORAGE ROOM.
  
 22.3. THE SITE PLAN APPEARS TO SHOW STEPS FROM THE
 ADJACENT WALKWAY INTO BOTH THE BIKE STORAGE AS WELL AS
 STAIR 3, ETC. THESE ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE ARCHITECTURAL
 PLANS. IF STEPS ARE BEING PROVIDED, PLEASE ENSURE THAT
 THIS IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE ADA ACCESSIBLE.
  
 23. THE WAIVER REGARDING THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING
 RELATIVE TO THE SETBACKS SHOULD BE EXPRESSED AS A
 WAIVER TO THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT PERMITTED. THE
 REFERENCE TO THE SETBACK CAN ALSO BE PROVIDED, BUT THE
 WAIVER TO THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT SHALL BE EXPRESSLY
 INDICATED.
  
 24. THE SETBACK SHALL BE INDICATED FOR THE MONUMENT
 SIGN. PER SEC. 94-407(2) OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS, THE SIGN
 SHALL BE 20 FEET FROM AN ADJACENT PROPERTY, AND 20 FEET
 FROM THE RIGHT-OF-WAY IF PLACED PERPENDICULAR TO THE
 STREET.
  
 25. THE HEIGHT OF THE FREESTANDING SIGN SHALL BE
 INDICATED. PER SEC. 94-207(2) OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS, THE
 SIGN SHALL NOT EXCEED FOUR (4) FEET IN HEIGHT.
  
 26. PLEASE PROVIDE CROSS SECTION (WITH CORRECT
 ELEVATIONS) SHOWING THE AREA FROM THE NORTH PROPERTY
 LINE TO THE BUILDING, INCLUDING THE RELATIONSHIP
 BETWEEN THE PROPOSED RETAINING WALL, THE PROPERTY LINE,
 THE EXISTING CONCRETE WALL, ETC.
  
 27. ALL SETBACKS NEED TO BE MEASURED FROM THE PROPERTY
 LINE TO THE CLOSEST POINT OF THE STRUCTURE. IT APPEARS
 THAT THAT AT LEASE THE REAR SETBACK IS NOT MEASURED TO
 THE CLOSEST POINT AS THERE ARE STRUCTURAL WALLS,
 COLUMNS, ETC. THAT ARE CLOSER TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND
 ARE NOT BEING ACCOUNTED FOR.
  
 28. DATA TABLE NEEDS TO INDICATE THE NUMBER OF COMPACT
 PARKING SPACES AND INDICATE COMPLIANCE WITH SEC.
 94-485(N)(1) OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS.
  
 29. TURNAROUND SPACES SHALL BE PROVIDED AT EACH
 DEAD-END PARKING AREA.
  
 30. DETAILS SHALL BE PROVIDED SHOWING THE PROPOSED
 SCREENING METHODS FOR THE PARKING GARAGE, INCLUDING HOW
 VEHICLE LIGHTS WILL BE BLOCKED FROM IMPACTING THE
 ADJACENT PROPERTIES, ETC.
  
 31. ADDITIONAL DETAIL NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED ON THE ROOF
 PLAN/ELEVATIONS TO INDICATE WHY THE HEIGHT OF THE
 BUILDING IS MEASURED AT 235' 2" AND NOT 244' 2". IS THE
 AREA ABOVE 235? 2? ENCLOSED, OR IS IT A SCREEN
 WALL/PARAPET?
  
 32. THE SITE DATA TABLE NEEDS TO INDICATE THE AREA
 ASSOCIATED WITH THE SUBMERGED LANDS AND INDICATE HOW
 THE DENSITY COMPLIES WITH SEC. 94-309(F)(3) OF THE
 CITY'S ZLDRS. NOTE THAT PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-309(F)(2)
 OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS, "A STATEMENT CONCURRENT WITH LAND
 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION OR BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION,
 IN A FORM ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY ATTORNEY, THAT AN
 APPLICATION TO FILL AND UTILIZE SUBMERGED LANDS WILL
 NOT BE FILLED FOLLOWING APPROVAL OF THE PLANNED
 DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT OR ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT."
  
 33. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-313(A) OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS, THE
 FOLLOWING INFORMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE DOCK IF
 IT IS TO BE INCLUDED IN THIS APPLICATION:
  
 33.1. A CROSS SECTION SHOWING ALL ELEMENTS OF THE
 PROPOSED DOCK, BOTTOM OF THE WATERWAY, MEAN HIGH WATER,
 BULKHEAD, ETC. SHALL BE PROVIDED. NO PORTION OF THE
 DOCK SHALL EXTEND ABOVE THE HEIGHT OF THE BULKHEAD WITH
 THE EXCEPTION OF SECURITY FENCES, BOAT LIFTS, AND
 MOORING DEVICES.
  
 33.2. A STUDY SHOWING THAT MARINE GRASSES, ETC. ARE NOT
 BEING IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED DOCK CONSTRUCTION.
  
 33.3. THE DISTANCE FROM THE END OF THE PROPOSED DOCK TO
 THE NAVIGABLE CHANNEL.
  
 33.4. A NOTATION SHALL BE MADE INDICATING THAT ALL
 SLIPS WITH BE PROVIDED WITH APPROPRIATE WATER AND
 ELECTRICAL SERVICE.
  
 33.5. AT LEAST ONE LADDER SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH
 DOCK, EXTENDING FROM THE DOCK SURFACE TO 2 FEET BELOW
 MEAN LOW WATER.
  
 33.6. WATER-RESISTANT REFLECTIVE NUMBER SHALL E
 PROVIDED ON THE END OF THE DOCK, VISIBLE FROM THE
 WATERWAY, CORRESPONDING TO THE STREET ADDRESS.
  
 34. PLEASE CLARIFY WHAT APPEAR TO BE PILINGS LOCATED
 OUTSIDE THE MIDDLE 1/3 OF THE LOT. ALL PILINGS, MOORING
 RELATED FACILITIES, ETC. SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN
 THE MIDDLE 1/3 OF THE LOT, AS REQUIRED BY SEC.
 94-313(A)(3)(H) OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS.
  
 35. THE DOCK PLATFORM ADJACENT TO THE SEAWALL APPEARS
 TO BE ENCROACHING OUTSIDE THE MIDDLE 1/3 OF THE LOT.
 ADDITIONALLY, THE PLATFORM SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN DOES
 NOT MATCH THAT WHICH IS SHOWN ON THE CIVIL PLANS.
 ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS ARE CONSISTENT AND ACCURATE.
  
 36. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-313(A)(3)(G)(II) OF THE CITY'S
 ZLDRS, DOCKS CONTAINING FOUR OR MORE MOORING SLIPS
 SHALL PROVIDE SANITARY SEWER PUMP OUT FACILITIES ON THE
 FOLLOWING BASIS: ONE SANITARY SEWER PUMP OUT RECEPTACLE
 FOR EVERY EIGHT MOORING SLIPS OR FRACTION THEREOF, OR
 APPROPRIATE CONNECTIONS TO EACH MOORING SLIP.
  
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) ELECTRONIC COPIES OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS
 SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE SEPTEMBER 21,
 2021, PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE
 SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED
 DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN MONDAY, AUGUST 2, 2021.
  
 G) TO BE PLACED ON THE SEPTEMBER 21, 2021, PLANNING
 BOARD AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO
 LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 6, 2021. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM,
 AND BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
 CITY?S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; SUCH
 REQUIREMENTS ARE ALSO PROVIDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE
 PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED ABOVE.
  
 H) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT
 DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE
 COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved