Plan Review Details - Project Z21040017
Plan Review Stops For Project Z21040017
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 05-12-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 05-12-2021 Time 20:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 05-12-2021 Time 20:04 Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-12 20:05:00NO COMMENTS ON PROPOSED STREETSCAPE.
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 3 Status F Date 12-22-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 12-22-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 12-22-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-12-22 09:25:04COMMENTS PER RICK ROSSANO, PROJ. COORD. WPB ENG.
 SERVICES, [email protected], 561-494-1098:
 1. CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY
 SEWER ARE REQUIRED.
 2. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND
 IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED
 AREAS.
 3. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL , PLANS SHALL SHOW
 PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER,
 STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES, INCLUDING
 STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY
 SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, METERS, AND
 OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH
 BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES
 SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS,
 CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND
 MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER LINES. ALL
 AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PROFILE VIEW.
 DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN
 VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. ADDITIONALLY,
 PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
 ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
 FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 4. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, CUT AND CAP
 UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY ABANDONED UTILITY
 LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY RIGHT OF WAY.
 5. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND
 NPDES NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.
 - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:
 - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS
 THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF
 DEVELOPMENT OR SALE; AND
 - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE
 STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A
 MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).
 - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF
 CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION
 THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL
 SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
 OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION. IF THE ENGINEERING PLANS DO
 NOT INCLUDE AN EROSION CONTROL PLAN, THEN THE
 CONTRACTOR SHOULD SUBMIT ONE PRIOR TO RECEIVING THE
 ENGINEERING PERMIT.
 6. PROVIDE PROFILES OF PROPOSED AND EXISTING WATER AND
 SEWER WITHIN RIGHT OF WAY AND SHOW ANY
 CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
 7. CLEARLY LABEL ROAD RIGHT OF WAY.
 8. PLEASE SHOW REPLACEMENT OF SANITARY LATERALS AND
 SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT PARCELS.
 9. PLEASE SHOW WATER SERVICES/METERS ETC. AND ADJACENT
 PARCEL ADDRESSES.
 10. WHEN TRENCHING IN IN CITY-MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS
 ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE 50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION
 TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF PROPOSED TRENCH PER CURRENT
 CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8.
 11. PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING AND
 INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER
 (Z-XXXXXXXX).
  
 COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPV.
 WPB PUB. UTIL. 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]:
  
 DID NOT RECEIVE RESPONSE TO PRIOR REVIEW COMMENTS.
 PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSE:
  
 -WATER MAIN TEES AT INTERSECTIONS NEED ADDITIONAL GATE
 VALVES FOR THE BRANCHES.
  
 -SOME WATER SERVICES AND METER BOXES APPEAR TO BE
 MISSING FROM CIVIL PLANS SUCH AS 1147 N RAILROAD AND
 1021 N RAILROAD.
  
 -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SHOW AND DETAIL MORE
 CLEARLY THE WATER MAIN CONNECTIONS FROM NEW 12 INCH
 WATER MAIN TO THE EXISTING WATER MAINS. INCLUDE INFO ON
 ANY PARTS, REDUCERS, VALVES, ETC.
  
 -MANY SECTIONS OF SEWER MAIN SAY 0.42% BUT ONE NEAR
 10TH AND RAILROAD SAYS 4.42%. IS THAT ACCURATE?
  
 -THERE ARE TRAFFIC SIGNS ATTACHED TO WOOD UTILITY POLE
 AT 11TH AND N RAILROAD. WILL THE UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING
 AFFECT THIS?
  
 -THERE ARE MANY GARAGES WITH DRIVEWAYS. HOW WILL THIS
 BE HANDLED? WILL THEY ALL STILL BE USABLE AT PROJECT
 COMPLETION, AND HAS THE PROJECT DESIGN MADE SURE
 PROPOSED TREES WILL NOT IMPEDE USE?
  
 -SEVERAL UTILITIES SUCH AS S113, S111, AND S107
 ENCROACH SLIGHTLY INTO PLANTERS. WILL THIS CAUSE
 PROBLEM?
  
 -S113 AND S110 ARE IN A CROSSWALK. WILL THESE CREATE
 ANY TRIP AND FALL HAZARDS OR PROBLEMS WITH USE OF
 CROSSWALK?
  
 -CANNOT TELL FROM PLANS IF SEWER MAIN ALONG THE WEST
 SIDE OF RAILROAD AVENUE UNDER THE SIDEWALK IS EXISTING
 OR PROPOSED AND WHAT IS HAPPENING TO IT. PLEASE MAKE
 MORE CLEAR.
  
 -ARE THERE ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED SEWER LATERAL
 CLEANOUTS IN PROJECT AREA? IF SO, PLEASE SHOW AND
 LABEL.
  
 -THERE IS AN EXISTING LIGHT POLE AT PROPOSED NORTH
 DRIVEWAY OF PARKING LOT ON 9TH ST. WHAT IS HAPPENING TO
 IT?
  
 -ON IRRIGATION PLAN, REPLACE PVB TYPE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY
 WITH RP TYPE.
  
 -THERE ARE EXISTING UTILITY POLES AND GUY WIRES IN
 ALLEY BETWEEN 8TH AND 9TH ST. ARE THOSE BEING
 UNDERGROUNDED?
  
 -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL: LABEL SEWER LATERALS
 WITH PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL TYPE, SHOW ALL FRANCHISE
 UTILITIES INCLUDING GAS AND FIBER OPTIC, CALLOUT ALL
 UTILITY CROSSINGS IN CLOSE PROXIMITY WITH ELEVATION
 INFO.
  
 -AT 10TH ST INTERSECTION, ONE WATER MAIN VALVE IS IN A
 CROSSWALK AND ONE FIRE HYDRANT SERVICE GATE VALVE IS IN
 A CROSSWALK. CAN BOTH BE RELOCATED OUTSIDE OF SIDEWALK?
  
 -WILL A FORCE MAIN OR SEWER MAIN RUN THROUGH PROPOSED
 PARKING LOTS? IF SO, PLEASE SHOW ON CIVIL PLANS.
  
 -WHAT ARE THE LARGE STRIPED AREAS JUST NORTH OF 10TH ST
 INTERSECTION? ARE THEY RAISED AND CURBED, OR LEVEL WITH
 THE STREET?
  
 -ARE THERE ANY PROPOSED GREASE TRAPS? IF SO, SHOW ON
 PLANS.
  
 -IS THE ENTIRETY OF NORTH RAILROAD AVENUE STREET FROM
 7TH ST TO 11TH ST BEING REPAVED WITH ASPHALT? CANNOT
 TELL FROM PLANS. PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL THE GENERAL
 OUTSKIRT BOUNDARIES OF THE PAVEMENT RESTORATION. ALSO
 INCLUDE ANY SIDESTREETS AND ALLEYS.
  
 -SOME BUILDING DOORS SUCH AS 917 AND 861 N RAILROAD
 LOOK TO OPEN OUTWARD INTO SIDEWALK. PLEASE SHOW ALL THE
 BUILDING DOORS AND MAKE SURE STREETSCAPE PLAN DESIGN
 WORKS IN UNISON WITH ANY DOORS.
  
  
 COMMENTS FROM MIKE TECHNOW, PUB. UTIL. ENGINEER,
 561-494-1047, [email protected] :
  
 -RECOMMEND TO GROUT THE EXISTING 8? SANITARY MAIN (ON
 THE EAST SIDE).
 -REPLACE STORMWATER PIPE ON 10TH ST/NORTH RAILROAD AS
 PART OF THE UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS.
 -REPLACE EXISTING SANITARY SERVICES, CALL OUT/SHOW
 CLEAN OUTS, WYES, SHOW CONNECTION TO NEW MAIN.
 -REDUCE WM TO 4? AT CONNECTION POINT.
 -SHOW DRY UTILITY CROSSING.
 -REPLACE EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTS.
 -CALL OUT NEW WATER SERVICES AND REPLACEMENTS.
 -CALL OUT SIZE OF WATER SERVICE.
 -SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRY UTILITIES (FPL
 UNDERGROUND).
 -SHOW WM PROFILE.
 -PROVIDE LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCS FOR PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT.
 -ARE THERE ANY LANDSCAPE PLANS?
  
  
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS.
 RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT
 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 08-16-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 08-16-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 08-16-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-08-16 12:52:50THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD
 CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES,
 PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]:
  
 -CIVIL PLANS IN RESUBMITTAL PACKAGE ARE MISSING A
 MAJORITY OF SHEETS, SO CANNOT VERIFY ADJUSTMENTS MADE
 TO PRIOR COMMENTS OR UTILITY UPDATES MADE AFTER RECENT
 MEETINGS. PLEASE SUBMIT FULL REVISED CIVIL PLAN SET
 SHOWING FULL LENGTH OF RAILROAD AVE. FROM 7TH ST. TO
 11TH ST.
  
 -LANDSCAPE PLANS SEEM TO BE MISSING SECTIONS OF
 RAILROAD AVE FROM 7TH ST. TO 11TH ST. PLEASE SUBMIT
 LANDSCAPING PLAN THAT CONTAINS ALL AREAS OF RAILROAD
 AVE FROM 7TH ST. TO 11TH ST.
  
 -AT 9TH ST. & N RAILROAD INTERSECTION, THERE APPEARS TO
 BE A WATER SERVICE CONFLICT WITH STORMWATER DRAINAGE
 STRUCTURE. PLEASE DISTANCE OR RELOCATE AS NECESSARY.
  
 -SEVERAL PROPOSED TREES IN LANDSCAPE PLANTERS APPEAR TO
 CONFLICT WITH WATER SERVICES. RELOCATE OR DISTANCE
 TREES AS NEEDED. ALSO ADD ROOT BARRIERS AS NEEDED. IF
 ADD ROOT BARRIERS, SHOW AND LABEL ON PLANS.
  
 -ENSURE THAT LIGHTING POLES WILL NOT CONFLICT WITH
 EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE.
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-03-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 05-03-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 05-03-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-03 12:03:08COMMENTS PER RICK ROSSANO, PROJ. COORD. WPB ENG.
 SERVICES, [email protected], 561-494-1098:
 1. WILL THERE BE IRRIGATION DEMANDS?
 2. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND
 IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED
 AREAS.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD
 CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES,
 PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]:
  
 -SHOW AND LABEL THE EXISTING WATER MAINS ON EACH
 UTILITY PLAN SHEET AND ADD DESCRIPTION OF WHAT IS
 HAPPENING TO THEM. BE SURE TO INCLUDE EXISTING WATER
 MAINS IN THE CONNECTING ALLEYS BETWEEN 9TH AND 10TH ST,
 AND 10TH AND 11TH ST.
  
 -WILL ALL OF THE EXISTING WATER MAIN ON N RAILROAD AVE
 BE ABANDONED? ALSO WILL IT BE GROUTED?
  
 -SHOW AND LABEL ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED FIRE
 HYDRANTS. ADD NOTES TO LABELS IF THEY ARE BEING
 RELOCATED.
  
 -SHOW AND LABEL ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER
 SERVICES AND WATER METER BOXES.
  
 -SHOW AND LABEL ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER MAIN OR
 SERVICE GATE VALVES 3 INCHES OR LARGER.
  
 -PLEASE ADD ADDITIONAL WATER MAIN GATE VALVES AT THE
 PROPOSED TEES AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF 10TH STREET AND
 9TH STREET.
  
 -WILL THE WATER MAIN CONNECTION WORK NEAR 11TH ST.
 CREATE ANY WATER MAIN OUTAGES? IF SO, PLEASE DESIGN AND
 PHASE TO MINIMIZE OR ELIMINATE SERVICE INTERRUPTIONS.
  
 -PLEASE VERIFY ALL WATER SERVICE SEGMENTS 3 INCHES OR
 LARGER ON N RAILROAD AVE IN THE STREET ARE BEING
 REPLACED.
  
 -LABEL FORCE MAINS ON SHEET C3.1 AND ADD SIZE.
  
 -LABEL 9TH ST. WATER MAIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED.
  
 -POSSIBLE LOCATION CONFLICT OF STORM MANHOLE CONVERSION
 AND FIRE HYDRANT NEAR 10TH ST INTERSECTION.
  
 -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL: 1) ADD CONFLICT
 RESOLUTION FOR WHERE THE PROPOSED WATER MAINS AT 10TH
 AND 9TH ST CROSS THE EXISTING WATER MAINS. 2) LABEL ALL
 WATER METERS WITH SIZE 3) LABEL ALL WATER SERVICE LINES
 WITH PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL TYPE.
  
 -WILL ANY NEW METERED IRRIGATION WATER SERVICES BE
 NEEDED FOR THE NEW LANDSCAPE AREAS?
  
 -IN HISTORIC PICTURES OF AREA THERE ARE BIG UTILITY
 POLES IN THE EASTERN SIDEWALK OF RAILROAD AVE. ARE
 THOSE STILL THERE AND WILL THEY REMAIN?
  
 -PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL ALL PAVEMENT RESTORATION AREAS
 FOR N RAILROAD AVE, 9TH ST, AND 10TH ST.
  
 -EXISTING WATER METER BOXES NEED TO BE REPLACED IN
 AREAS WHERE THE SURROUNDING/ADJACENT HARDSCAPE IS BEING
 REPLACED.
  
  
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS.
 RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT
 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 05-06-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 05-06-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 05-06-2021 Time 12:21 Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-06 12:31:54FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES
 WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMETS:
  
 FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES NOT
 CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 IT APPEARS THAT A 18' ROADWAY IS PROPOSED WITH TREES
 THAT HAVE CANOPYS THAT MAY GROW AND ENCROACH ON THE
 REQUIRED 13'6" MINIMUM HEIGHT CLEARENCE FOR EMERGENCY
 APPARATUS.
  
 PERIODIC MONITORING AND TRIMMING MAY BE NEEDED TO
 ENSURE CLEARANCE.
  
 FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT THE
 APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 12-06-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 12-06-2021 Time 14:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 12-06-2021 Time 14:55 Sent To  
Notes
2021-12-06 14:56:02FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: RAILROAD AVE STREETSCAPE Z21040017
 DECEMBER 6, 2021
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
 1. SATISFIED. SEPARATE THE TREE DISPOSITION LIST FOR
 THE STREETSCAPE. SHOW ALL TREES AND PALMS TO BE REMOVED
 ON DISPOSITION LIST AS REMOVE AND CALCULATE THE
 MITIGATION DUE. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET IN CANOPY
 DIAMETER AND PALMS ARE CALCULATED BY CATEGORY, AND ANY
 TREES 20 FEET IN CANOPY DIAMETER OR GREATER USE THE
 ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE. PROVIDE THE TOTAL MITIGATION DUE
 IN SQUARE FOOTAGE OF CANOPY.
 2. SATISFIED. INDICATE THE LENGTH OF THE AFFECTED AREA
 AND CALCULATE THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED NUMBER OF
 STREET TREES. STREET TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM SIZE
 OF 20 FEET IN HEIGHT AND MEET FLORIDA GRADE #1
 STANDARDS. CORRECT SIZES ON PLANT LIST.
 THE TOTAL LENGTH OF EACH SIDE OF THE AFFECTED AREA MUST
 BE SHOWN ON THE PLANS, AND THE TOTAL NUMBER OF STREET
 TREES REQUIRED FOR EACH SIDE BASED ON ONE FOR EVERY 30
 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF SHOWN. SHOW THE PROVIDED NUMBER
 FOR EACH SIDE. THERE ARE WIDE GAPS ON THE EAST SIDE
 WITHOUT TREE CANOPY NORTH OF 9TH STREET.
  
 3. SATISFIED. SHOW LIGHTING LOCATIONS ON THE TREE PLAN
 TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH TREES.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE INFORMATION ON UNDERGROUNDING OF
 OVERHEAD FPL, PHONE AND CABLE WIRES.
  
 5. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL WATER, SEWER AND
 DRAINAGE LINES ON THE TREE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS.
  
 6. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING AREAS OF REQUIRED
 STRUCTURAL SOIL OR SOIL CELLS UNDER THE SIDEWALK
 HARDSCAPE AREAS ADJACENT TO EACH TREE REQUIRED PER
 SECTION 94-113.
  
 7. SATISFIED. CROSS SECTIONS SHOW ROOT BARRIERS
 LIMITING THE ROOT ZONES OF THE TREES. THERE IS A
 MINIMUM AREA OF ROOT ZONE AND SOIL VOLUME REQUIRED FOR
 EACH TREE THAT WILL HAVE TO BE INDICATED INCLUDING THE
 STRUCTURAL SOIL.
  
 8. SATISFIED. THE BONDED RUBBER MULCH HAS NOT BEEN
 APPROVED FOR STREETSCAPE USE AS OF THIS TIME.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 9/8/21:
  
 9. SATISFIED. ARACHIS GLABRA PERENNIAL PEANUT IS NOT A
 FLORIDA NATIVE PLANT. ADJUST PLANT LIST AND FLORIDA
 FRIENDLY POINTS ACCORDINGLY.
  
 10. SATISFIED. PLANT LIST INDICATES GREEN BUTTONWOOD,
 BUT PHOTO IS OF SILVER BUTTONWOOD. CORRECT PHOTO.
  
 11. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
 NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED FOR THE LONG TERM MAINTENANCE OF
 THE HARDSCAPE, TREE GRATES, LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION.
  
 12. SATISFIED. THE SECTIONS OF THE SIDE STREETS ALSO
 REQUIRE STREET TREES. THESE CAN BE INCLUDED WITH THE
 PARKING LOTS OR THE STREETSCAPE.
  
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
  
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
 4. PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 POINTS SHALL BE REVISED SO THAT 51% IS NOT TAKEN IN TWO
 CATEGORIES FOR 4. SHRUBS AND 5. TREES. NEW TOTAL SHALL
 BE SHOWN AFTER ADJUSTMENT.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 09-08-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 09-08-2021 Time 15:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 09-08-2021 Time 15:48 Sent To  
Notes
2021-09-08 15:48:47FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: RAILROAD AVE STREETSCAPE Z21040017
 SEPTEMBER 8, 2021
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
 1. SATISFIED. SEPARATE THE TREE DISPOSITION LIST FOR
 THE STREETSCAPE. SHOW ALL TREES AND PALMS TO BE REMOVED
 ON DISPOSITION LIST AS REMOVE AND CALCULATE THE
 MITIGATION DUE. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET IN CANOPY
 DIAMETER AND PALMS ARE CALCULATED BY CATEGORY, AND ANY
 TREES 20 FEET IN CANOPY DIAMETER OR GREATER USE THE
 ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE. PROVIDE THE TOTAL MITIGATION DUE
 IN SQUARE FOOTAGE OF CANOPY.
 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. INDICATE THE LENGTH OF THE
 AFFECTED AREA AND CALCULATE THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED
 NUMBER OF STREET TREES. STREET TREES MUST MEET THE
 MINIMUM SIZE OF 20 FEET IN HEIGHT AND MEET FLORIDA
 GRADE #1 STANDARDS. CORRECT SIZES ON PLANT LIST.
 THE TOTAL LENGTH OF EACH SIDE OF THE AFFECTED AREA MUST
 BE SHOWN ON THE PLANS, AND THE TOTAL NUMBER OF STREET
 TREES REQUIRED FOR EACH SIDE BASED ON ONE FOR EVERY 30
 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF SHOWN. SHOW THE PROVIDED NUMBER
 FOR EACH SIDE. THERE ARE WIDE GAPS ON THE EAST SIDE
 WITHOUT TREE CANOPY NORTH OF 9TH STREET.
  
 3. SATISFIED. SHOW LIGHTING LOCATIONS ON THE TREE PLAN
 TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH TREES.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE INFORMATION ON UNDERGROUNDING OF
 OVERHEAD FPL, PHONE AND CABLE WIRES.
  
 5. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL WATER, SEWER AND
 DRAINAGE LINES ON THE TREE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS.
  
 6. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING AREAS OF REQUIRED
 STRUCTURAL SOIL OR SOIL CELLS UNDER THE SIDEWALK
 HARDSCAPE AREAS ADJACENT TO EACH TREE REQUIRED PER
 SECTION 94-113.
  
 7. SATISFIED. CROSS SECTIONS SHOW ROOT BARRIERS
 LIMITING THE ROOT ZONES OF THE TREES. THERE IS A
 MINIMUM AREA OF ROOT ZONE AND SOIL VOLUME REQUIRED FOR
 EACH TREE THAT WILL HAVE TO BE INDICATED INCLUDING THE
 STRUCTURAL SOIL.
  
 8. SATISFIED. THE BONDED RUBBER MULCH HAS NOT BEEN
 APPROVED FOR STREETSCAPE USE AS OF THIS TIME.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 9/8/21:
  
 9. ARACHIS GLABRA PERENNIAL PEANUT IS NOT A FLORIDA
 NATIVE PLANT. ADJUST PLANT LIST AND FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 POINTS ACCORDINGLY.
  
 10. PLANT LIST INDICATES GREEN BUTTONWOOD, BUT PHOTO IS
 OF SILVER BUTTONWOOD. CORRECT PHOTO.
  
 11. A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED FOR
 THE LONG TERM MAINTENANCE OF THE HARDSCAPE, TREE
 GRATES, LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION.
  
 12. THE SECTIONS OF THE SIDE STREETS ALSO REQUIRE
 STREET TREES. THESE CAN BE INCLUDED WITH THE PARKING
 LOTS OR THE STREETSCAPE.
  
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-07-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 05-07-2021 Time 12:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 05-07-2021 Time 12:44 Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-07 12:45:10 
 FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: RAILROAD AVE STREETSCAPE Z21040017
 MAY 7, 2021
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
 1. SEPARATE THE TREE DISPOSITION LIST FOR THE
 STREETSCAPE. SHOW ALL TREES AND PALMS TO BE REMOVED ON
 DISPOSITION LIST AS REMOVE AND CALCULATE THE MITIGATION
 DUE. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET IN CANOPY DIAMETER AND
 PALMS ARE CALCULATED BY CATEGORY, AND ANY TREES 20 FEET
 IN CANOPY DIAMETER OR GREATER USE THE ACTUAL SQUARE
 FOOTAGE. PROVIDE THE TOTAL MITIGATION DUE IN SQUARE
 FOOTAGE OF CANOPY.
 2. INDICATE THE LENGTH OF THE AFFECTED AREA AND
 CALCULATE THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED NUMBER OF STREET
 TREES. STREET TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM SIZE OF 20
 FEET IN HEIGHT AND MEET FLORIDA GRADE #1 STANDARDS.
 CORRECT SIZES ON PLANT LIST.
  
 3. SHOW LIGHTING LOCATIONS ON THE TREE PLAN TO AVOID
 CONFLICTS WITH TREES.
  
 4. PROVIDE INFORMATION ON UNDERGROUNDING OF OVERHEAD
 FPL, PHONE AND CABLE WIRES.
  
 5. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL WATER, SEWER AND DRAINAGE
 LINES ON THE TREE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS.
  
 6. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING AREAS OF REQUIRED STRUCTURAL
 SOIL OR SOIL CELLS UNDER THE SIDEWALK HARDSCAPE AREAS
 ADJACENT TO EACH TREE REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-113.
  
 7. CROSS SECTIONS SHOW ROOT BARRIERS LIMITING THE ROOT
 ZONES OF THE TREES. THERE IS A MINIMUM AREA OF ROOT
 ZONE AND SOIL VOLUME REQUIRED FOR EACH TREE THAT WILL
 HAVE TO BE INDICATED INCLUDING THE STRUCTURAL SOIL.
  
 8. THE BONDED RUBBER MULCH HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED FOR
 STREETSCAPE USE AS OF THIS TIME.
  
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status P Date 05-07-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 05-07-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 05-07-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-07 14:12:00NO OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 3 Status F Date 02-14-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 02-14-2022 Time 11:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 02-14-2022 Time 12:02 Sent To  
Notes
2022-02-14 12:02:12THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 11-23-2021 SUBMITTAL:
  
 1. PGD PLAN CALLS FOR THE PLUGGING OF THE SW INVERT OF
 THE STORM MH AT THE INTERSECTION OF 10TH STREET AND
 RAILROAD AVE. THE DEMOLITION PLAN CALLS FOR THE STORM
 PIPE CONNECTED TO THE SW INVERT TO REMAIN. IF THE
 INVERT IS BEING PLUGGED, THE PIPE SHOULD BE REMOVED AS
 WELL AS THE CURB INLET CONNECTED AT THE OTHER END OF
 THE PIPE. THE EXISTING INLET WILL BE LOCATED IN THE
 PROPOSED 8 FT WIDE SIDEWALK. IF THE STORM PIPE REMAINS,
 SHOW IT ON THE SANITARY SEWER PROFILE.
  
 2. WHERE RAISED CURB OR CURB AND GUTTER IS PROPOSED,
 CONFIRM THE BACK OF SIDEWALK WILL BE HIGHER THAN THE
 TOP OF CURB FOR POSITIVE DRAINAGE OF THE SIDEWALK.
  
 3. PIPE CONFLICT INFORMATION SHOULD INCLUDE THE PIPE
 THICKNESS WHEN CALCULATION TOP OF PIPE OR BOTTOM OF
 PIPE ELEVATIONS. THE CLEARANCE DISTANCE SHOULD BE FROM
 OUTSIDE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE OF PIPE.
  
 4. THE STORM PIPE BETWEEN S-101 AND S-102 IS AT AN
 ADVERSE SLOPE AND MAY BE IN CONFLICT WITH THE 6-INCH
 WATER MAIN TO THE FIRE HYDRANT. CALLOUT CONFLICT
 INFORMATION ON THE WATER AND SEWER PLANS.
  
 5. THE 12-INCH WATER MAIN IS CROSSING UNDER THE
 EXISTING 15-INCH RCP STORM PIPE FROM STRUCTURE S-101.
 MAKE SURE THERE IS ADEQUATE VERTICAL CLEARANCE PER
 PBCHD.
  
 6. STRUCTURE S-102 MAY BE IN CONFLICT WITH SANITARY
 SEWER LATERAL. IS THE LATERAL BEING REPLACED OR
 REMOVED?
  
 7. NO PROPOSED DRAINAGE SHOWN ON N. RAILROAD AVE
 BETWEEN 7TH ST AND 8TH ST. SECTIONS G AND H SHOW
 PROPOSED 18? RCP STORM. ADVISE HOW THE NEW GUTTERS WILL
 DRAIN INTO THE EXISTING INLETS AT 7TH ST.
  
 8. LABEL RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS ON THE PGD SECTIONS.
  
 9. SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING LIMITS ON ALL STREETS AND
 ALLEYS.
  
 10. SOME PROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURES ARE SHOWN WITHIN
 CROSSWALKS.
  
 11. SHOULD CROSSWALK ON N. RAILROAD AVE AT AT 7TH
 STREET BE CLOSER TO THE INTERSECTION?
  
 12. ALL RIGHT OF WAY LINES FOR STREETS AND ALLEYS
 SHOULD BE SHOWN AND LABELED.
  
 13. LIGHT POLES APPEAR TO BE IN CONFLICT WITH
 UNDERGROUND UTILITIES.
  
 14. EXPLAIN HOW GUTTERS WILL FLOW AROUND UBER/LIFT
 DROPOFF/PICKUP AREAS.
  
 15. CONFIRM SLOPE DIRECTION FOR AREAS OUTSIDE OF RIGHT
 OF WAY FOR SECTIONS F1, F2, AND F3.
  
 16. DOES THE ON-SITE EXFILTRATION TRENCH DETAIL ON
 SHEET C5.1 APPLY TO THE EXFILTRATION TRENCHES ON N.
 RAILROAD AVE.? CONFIRM THE ELEVATIONS LISTED ON THE
 DETAIL. SHOW WHERE THE SILVA CELLS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED
 (HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL OFFSETS) WHEN ADJACENT TO AN
 EXFILTRATION TRENCH (SEE HARDSCAPE PLANS FOR SILVA CELL
 DETAIL).
  
 17. NOTE 2 ON FDOT STANDARD PLAN 711-011 (SHEET 10 OF
 13) DISCUSSES MAKING THE CROSSWALK STRIPING PARALLEL TO
 THE LANE LINES WHEN THE SPECIAL EMPHASIS CROSSWALK IS
 NOT PERPENDICULAR TO THE LANE LINES. THIS COMMENT
 APPLIES TO THE CROSSWALKS CROSSING THE SIDE STREETS.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-06-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 10-06-2021 Time 09:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 10-06-2021 Time 09:40 Sent To  
Notes
2021-10-06 09:40:29THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 8/5/2021 NORA STREETSCAPE PROJECT SUBMITTAL:
  
 1. R/W CROSS SECTIONS A-A THROUGH F-F SHOW PAVERS
 INSTEAD OF VALLEY GUTTER AT EDGE OF TRAVEL LANES. THE
 HARDSCAPE PLAN DETAILS SHOW THE PAVERS OVER A CONCRETE
 VALLEY GUTTER. SHOW THE VALLEY GUTTER ON THE CROSS
 SECTIONS AND ADD A NOTE ON THE CIVIL PLANS TO REFER TO
 THE HARDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 2. THE HARDSCAPE PLAN SHEET L1-110 SHOWS RAIL AT THE
 FRONT OF SIDEWALKS AND DOWN THE CENTER OF N. RAILROAD
 AVE. THE CROSS SECTIONS ON THE CIVIL PLANS ONLY SHOW
 THE RAILS AT THE FRONT OF SIDEWALKS.
  
 3. LABEL THE R/W LINES ON THE CROSS SECTIONS A-A
 THROUGH F-F. SHOW EXISTING GROUND OUTSIDE THE R/W AND
 HOW SECTIONS WILL TRANSITION TO EXISTING GRADES.
  
 4. WHEN REFERRING TO FDOT STANDARD DETAILS, USE THE
 STANDARD PLAN NUMBER INSTEAD OF THE STANDARD INDEX
 NUMBER.
  
 5. INDICATE WHAT HAPPENS TO THE EXISTING DRAINAGE
 SYSTEM ON 10TH STREET AND THE EXISTING CURB INLET ON
 THE WEST SIDE OF N. RAILROAD AVE AT 10TH ST.
  
 6. INDICATE WHAT HAPPENS TO THE EXISTING DRAINAGE
 SYSTEM IN THE INTERSECTION OF 9TH STREET AND N.
 RAILROAD AVE.
  
 7. INDICATE WHAT HAPPENS TO THE EXISTING DRAINAGE
 SYSTEM IN THE INTERSECTION OF 8TH STREET AND N.
 RAILROAD AVE.
  
 8. FOR THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL, DEMONSTRATE
 THE CHANGE IN TRIBUTARY DRAINAGE AREA TO THE 9TH ST AND
 10TH STREET DRAINAGE SYSTEM WILL NOT CAUSE NEGATIVE
 IMPACTS TO THE DOWNSTREAM AREAS OF THESE SYSTEMS.
  
 9. STOP THE EXFILTRATION TRENCHES ON N. RAILROAD AVE.
 BEFORE THE ALLEY R/W.
  
 10. DESIGN OF THE TRANSITION GRADING TO EXISTING STREET
 SECTION WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED WITH THE ENGINEERING
 PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 11. DESIGN INFORMATION FOR STORM MH S-118 CUT OFF BY
 CROSS SECTION VIEW ON SHEET C2.2.
  
 12. INCLUDE THE SHEET NUMBER REFERENCE WITH THE
 MATCHLINE CALLOUTS SINCE SEVERAL SHEETS HAVE THE SAME
 MATCHLINE LETTERS.
  
 13. INCLUDE WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL AN
 EXFILTRATION TRENCH DETAIL SHOWING THE TOP AND BOTTOM
 ELEVATIONS OF THE TRENCH AND INVERT ELEVATION OF THE
 STORM PIPE AND THE WIDTH OF THE TRENCH.
  
 14. INCLUDE WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL A
 DETAIL OF THE CONTROL STRUCTURE FOR THE ROADWAY
 DRAINAGE SYSTEM. NOTE THE CITY DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE
 OF BLEEDERS FOR EXFILTRATION TRENCH SYSTEMS.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-08-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 05-08-2021 Time 23:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 05-08-2021 Time 23:30 Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-08 23:30:15THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 2. SHOW THE EXISTING STORM PIPES ON 10TH STREET AND 8TH
 STREET.
  
 3. PROVIDE SPREAD CALCULATIONS WITH THE ENGINEERING
 PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL.
  
 4. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP
 CRITERIA.
  
 5. PROVIDE CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING DRAINAGE
 STRUCTURES AND STORM PIPE THAT WILL REMAIN.
  
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
  
 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED
 WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 3. PROVIDE COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP PERMIT.
  
 4. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED WITH THE
 ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-23-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 09-23-2021 Time 09:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-09-23 09:49:131. CIVIL PLANS APPEAR TO BE FOR THE PARKING LOTS AND
 NOT THE STREETSCAPE.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 12-07-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 12-07-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-12-07 21:57:29TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A COMPLETE TRAFFIC STUDY WITH
 DETAILED NARRATIVE ACCORDING TO COUNTY'S ARTICLE 12.
 NOTE: EXCEPTION FROM COUNTY'S CONCURRENCY DOES NOT
 PRECLUDE THE CITY TO REQUEST AN IN-DEPTH TRAFFIC
 ANALYSIS. LATEST STUDY IS IDENTICAL TO THE ORIGINAL
 SUBMISSION.
  
 SITE COMMENTS
 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MINIMUM 5-FOOT SIDEWALK ALONG
 8TH AND 9TH ST
 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MINIMUM 10-FOOT SIDEWALK ALONG
 RAILROAD AVENUE
 4) SATISFIED. IS THERE ANY SERVICE ROAD CONTEMPLATED
 BETWEEN THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND THE RAILROAD
 TRUCKS?
 5) TO BE SATISFIED AT BUILDING PERMIT. PROVIDE AUTOTURN
 ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING
 IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE
 DYNAMIC ENVELOPES CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE
 PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING
 6) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY
 ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20
 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS
 (CIRCUIT BOX AND ELECTRIC CONDUIT)
 7) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE
 NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES,
 INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-07-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 05-07-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 05-03-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-07 11:43:45TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) PROVIDE A COMPLETE TRAFFIC STUDY WITH DETAILED
 NARRATIVE ACCORDING TO COUNTY?S ARTICLE 12. NOTE:
 EXCEPTION FROM COUNTY?S CONCURRENCY DOES NOT PRECLUDE
 THE CITY TO REQUEST AN IN-DEPTH TRAFFIC ANALYSIS.
  
 SITE COMMENTS
 2) PROVIDE A MINIMUM 5-FOOT SIDEWALK ALONG 8TH AND 9TH
 ST
 3) PROVIDE A MINIMUM 10-FOOT SIDEWALK ALONG RAILROAD
 AVENUE
 4) IS THERE ANY SERVICE ROAD CONTEMPLATED BETWEEN THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND THE RAILROAD TRUCKS?
 5) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND
 SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES CLEARLY
 DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE
 FILE/DRAWING
 6) IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY ACCESSIBLE
 MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 FEET) AND
 PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS (CIRCUIT BOX
 AND ELECTRIC CONDUIT)
 7) PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF
 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA
 AND BICYCLE ONES
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 12-20-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By ckimmerl Date 12-20-2021 Time 15:15 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ckimmerl Date 12-20-2021 Time 15:14 Sent To  
Notes
2021-12-20 15:13:5210/13/21 ZONING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION OF THE
 EXISTING BUILDINGS ON WEST SIDE OF RAILROAD AVENUE TO
 CONFIRM THERE ARE NO ISSUES WITH MEETING THE PROPOSED
 CURBLESS STREET DESIGN. PLEASE PROVIDE FINISHED FLOOR
 ELEVATIONS OF THE EXISTING BUILDINGS ON THE WEST SIDE
 OF NORTH RAILROAD AVE IN SECTION DRAWINGS. NOT SEEN IN
 THE REFERENCED L1-100, C2.1 AND C2.2 SHEETS
 RESPONSE: GRADING SHEETS HAVE BEEN REVISED TO BETTER
 CLARIFY THAT THE WESTERN EDGE OF THE STREETSCAPE
 SECTION CORRESPONDS WITH THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS
 OF EACH OF THE BUILDINGS. EXISTING BUILDINGS AT DOOR
 THRESHOLDS FFE WERE ADDED TO HARDSCAPE PLAN. REFER TO
 SHEET L1-110. REV 2.
 [SATISFIED]
  
 2. PLEASE LIST TOTAL NUMBER OF EXISTING ON-STREET
 PARKING SPACES VS PROPOSED. NOT SEEN IN REFERENCED
 L0-003 SHEET.
 RESPONSE: THE TOTAL NUMBER OF EXISTING ON-STREET
 PARKING SPACES LOCATED ON THE EAST AND WEST SIDES OF N.
 RAILROAD AVENUE IS 56 PARALLEL SPACES. NO ON-STREET
 PARKING SPACES SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON FINAL SITE PLAN
 APPROVAL FOR THE FOUR OFF-STREET PARKING LOTS LOCATED
 ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF N. RAILROAD AVENUE. UP TO TWO
 SEPARATE DROP-OFF/PICK-UP PULL OFF AREAS HAVE BEEN
 PROVIDED ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO
 FACILITATE RIDE SHARING/UBER/MASS TRANSIT SERVICES
 ACCESSING THE SHOPS AND SERVICES ALONG N. RAILROAD
 AVENUE AND TO MINIMIZE CONFLICTS WITH PEDESTRIAN
 TRAFFIC ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF N. RAILROAD AVENUE.
 [SATISFIED] CLARIFY THE DROP-OFF/PICKUP LOCATIONS
 COUNT, THERE ARE 2 BETWEEN 10TH AND 9TH AND AN
 ADDITIONAL 2 BETWEEN 8TH AND 7TH?
 SHEETS L0-002 AND L0-0003 SHOW 48 ON-STREET PARKING
 SPACES, PLEASE IDENTIFY REMAINING 8 SPACES THAT ARE TO
 BE REMOVED.
  
 3. IF OVERHEAD POWER LINES ARE GOING UNDERGROUND,
 PLEASE IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF THE ABOVE GROUND
 TRANSFORMERS. - PLEASE SHOW ON THE LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL
 PLANS THE EXACT LOCATION FOR THE FPL HIGH VOLTAGE
 SWITCH CABINET DESCRIBED IN THE RESPONSE (A.) AT N.
 RAILROAD AVE BETWEEN 7TH AND 8TH.
 ? PLEASE INDICATE IN THE DRAWINGS THE LOCATION OF THE
 NEW TRANSFORMER VAULT DESCRIBED IN COMMENT (D.) AT
 ADDRESS 809 AND 925.
 RESPONSE: LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS WERE UPDATED TO REFLECT
 EXACT LOCATION. FPL HIGH VOLTAGE SWITCH CABINETS EXACT
 LOCATION IS AT THE ALLEY BETWEEN 7TH AND 8TH STREET.
 (HVL SWITCH). REFER TO SHEET L1-110. THE OTHER CABINETS
 ARE LOCATED OUT OF CURRENT LANDSCAPE SCOPE BETWEEN 10TH
 AND 11 STREET. IN ADDITION, TRANSFORMERS WERE
 COORDINATED AND LOCATED ON LANDSCAPE PLANS. REFER TO
 SHEETS L1-110 AND L1-120 USE OF PAD MOUNTED
 TRANSFORMERS ALONG N. RAILROAD AVENUE WILL NEGATE THE
 USE OF TRANSFORMER VAULTS AT THE 809 AND 925 ADDRESSES.
 [SATISFIED] PLEASE IDENTIFY AND CONFIRM THERE ARE NO
 CONFLICTS WITH ELECTRICAL LINES/UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING
 AND THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING. (EX. ON ALLEY BETWEEN 7TH
 AND 8TH, LINE RUNS UNDER TREES) OTHER LOCATIONS ALSO
 SUBJECT TO POTENTIAL CONFLICTS.
  
 4. (PARTIALLY SATISFIED) BONDED RUBBER MULCH IS NOT
 AUTHORIZED AT THIS POINT FOR USE IN PLANTING AREAS. ?
 BONDED RUBBER MULCH IS STILL PROPOSED WITHIN THE
 STREETSCAPE VERGE? WHERE IS THIS WITHIN THE
 PLANS/DRAWINGS, ARE THESE STREETSCAPE VERGES PART OF
 THE PLATING AREAS?
 RESPONSE: BONDED RUBBER MULCH WAS REMOVED. PROPOSED
 PINE BARK NUGGETS MULCH TO BE LOCATED ON PLANTING AREAS
 WERE APPLICABLE. REFER TO HARDSCAPE SCHEDULE CODE
 32-91-13. SHEET L1-110.
 [SATISFIED]
  
 5. (PARTIALLY SATISFIED) HAVE THERE BEEN ANY
 DISCUSSIONS ABOUT ALLOWING SOME LIMIT NUMBER OF
 ON-STREET PARKING SPACES TO USE FOR DROP OFF AN PICKUP
 AND LOADING?
 ? IS THE SINGLE DROP-OFF/LOADING SPACE SUFFICIENT FOR
 THE WESTERN SIDE OF THE ROAD AT 8TH AND N. RAILROAD
 AVE? WE MAY WANT TO ACCOMMODATE CARS/TRUCKS COMING FROM
 11TH STREET SOUTH.
 ? POSSIBLY INCLUDE LOADING/DROP-OFF SPACE ONE PER
 BLOCK? FURTHER DISCUSSION IS NEEDED WITH TRAFFIC
 ENGINEER.
 RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. REFER TO MASTER PLAN.
 [SATISFIED]
  
 6. PLEASE PROVIDE PHOTOMETRICS FOR THE STREET AND
 INCLUDE FIXTURE AND POLE DETAILS. ? THERE ARE GAPS IN
 THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN, THE PHOTOMETRIC CALCULATION SHALL
 SPAN THE ENTIRE SITE/STREETSCAPE. PLEASE SHOW
 ILLUMINATION LEVELS ON THE SIDEWALKS ALSO.
 RESPONSE: NOTED. INFORMATION WAS UPDATED. REFER TO
 SHEETS L1-140, L1-140A, L1-141 AND L1-141A. REVISED
 PHOTOMETRICS ARE NOW PROVIDED TO INCLUDE THE
 ILLUMINATION LEVELS ON THE SIDEWALKS AS WELL AS
 FIXTURE/POLE DETAILS. SEE SHEETS PH-1 THROUGH PH-3.
 [SATISFIED]
  
 7. PLEASE INCLUDE ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS IN THE
 LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS TO IDENTIFY ANY POSSIBLE CONFLICTS.
 ? PLEASE SHOW ON THE LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL PLANS THE
 EXACT LOCATION OF THE FPL HIGH VOLTAGE SWITCH CABINET
 DESCRIBED IN THE RESPONSE (A.) AT N. RAILROAD AVE
 BETWEEN 7TH AND 8TH ? PLEASE INDICATE IN THE DRAWINGS
 THE LOCATION OF THE NEW TRANSFORMER VAULT DESCRIBED IN
 COMMENT (D.) AT ADDRESS 809 AND 925
 RESPONSE: FPL HIGH VOLTAGE SWITCH CABINET (HVL SWITCH).
 WAS ADDED ON PLANS. REFER TO SHEET L1-110.
 [SATISFIED]
  
 8. WHERE WILL THE BACK OF THE HOUSE UTILITIES GO FOR
 THE WESTERN BUILDINGS? GREASE TRAPS? IS THE FEC
 GRANTING AN ACCESS EASEMENT ON THE NARROW PARCEL ALONG
 THE RAILWAY CORRIDOR?
 RESPONSE: NDT HAS NEGOTIATED AN EASEMENT WITH THE FEC
 FOR USE IN THE BACK-OF-HOUSE AREAS FOR LOADING AND
 DELIVERY, AS WELL AS ACCESS FOR EMPLOYEE PARKING. ALL
 SEWER SERVICE TO THE BUILDINGS IS IN THE FRONT OF THE
 BUILDINGS, IN NORTH RAILROAD AVENUE. AS SUCH, GREASE
 TRAPS WILL NEED TO BE LOCATED IN THE FRONT OF THE
 BUILDINGS, AND WILL REQUIRE AN EASEMENT FROM THE CITY
 FOR THAT PURPOSE. THE NEXT SUBMITTALS FOR THE BUILDINGS
 WILL INCLUDE MORE COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING FOR THE AREAS
 IN THE BACK-OF-HOUSE BETWEEN THE BUILDINGS AND THE FEC
 TRACKS.
 [SATISFIED] FINAL LOCATION OF GREASE TRAPS WILL HAVE TO
 BE NEGOTIATED AND AGREED UPON BY ENGINEERING, SAME WITH
 DETAILS OF EASEMENT. STAFF RECOMMENDS IMPLEMENTING AN
 ALTERNATIVE COVER OR CAP OVER/ABOVE THE TRAPS TO MATCH
 PROPOSED ROW/SIDEWALK PAVER SYSTEM, IN ORDER TO REDUCE
 THE VISUAL IMPACT OF GREASE TRAPS IN PUBLIC ROW.
 SUGGEST SIMILAR CONCEPT/PRODUCT AS ?WUNDER COVERS?
  
 9. WHERE ARE THE DCDV FIRE VALVES LOCATED? CAN THE
 VALVES BE RELOCATED TO INSIDE OF THE BUILDINGS? PLEASE
 INDICATE ANY ABOVEGROUND VALVES/ASSEMBLIES NEEDED FOR
 THE PROJECT DCDV, GAS CONNECTION, FDC, ETC. (WEST SIDE
 RENOVATION).
 RESPONSE: ALL FIRE SERVICES CURRENTLY ENTER THE
 BUILDINGS FROM NORTH RAILROAD AVENUE AND ARE LOCATED
 INSIDE THE BUILDINGS. THE FIRE SERVICES ARE OLD AND
 GENERALLY DO NOT MEET CURRENT STANDARDS. WE HAVE MET ON
 SITE WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT REPRESENTATIVES AND WITH
 MARK HURLEY, AND HAVE AGREED THAT THE FIRE DCDVS WILL
 CONTINUE TO BE HOUSED INSIDE THE BUILDINGS AND WILL BE
 RECONSTRUCTED TO MEET CURRENT STANDARDS. THERE ARE
 EXISTING WALL-MOUNTED FDC?S WHICH WILL REMAIN, OR
 PERHAPS BE RELOCATED. BUT THEY WILL REMAIN AS WALL
 MOUNTED.
 [SATISFIED]
  
 10. EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTS, WILL THESE UNITS NEED TO BE
 REPLACED, UPDATED WHEN MOVING TO THE PROPOSED
 LOCATIONS?
 RESPONSE: PLANS HAVE BEEN REVISED TO INDICATE THAT ALL
 EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTS WILL BE REPLACED WITH NEW ONES.
 [SATISFIED]
  
  
 NEW COMMENTS/CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 12/20/21:
  
 1. PLEASE IDENTIFY AND CONFIRM THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS
 WITH ELECTRICAL LINES/UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING AND THE
 PROPOSED LANDSCAPING. (EX. ON ALLEY BETWEEN 7TH AND
 8TH, LINE RUNS UNDER TREES) OTHER LOCATIONS ALSO
 SUBJECT TO POTENTIAL CONFLICTS.
  
 2. FINAL LOCATION OF GREASE TRAPS WILL HAVE TO BE
 NEGOTIATED AND AGREED UPON BY ENGINEERING, SAME WITH
 DETAILS OF EASEMENT. STAFF RECOMMENDS IMPLEMENTING AN
 ALTERNATIVE COVER OR CAP OVER/ABOVE THE TRAPS TO MATCH
 PROPOSED ROW/SIDEWALK PAVER SYSTEM, IN ORDER TO REDUCE
 THE VISUAL IMPACT OF GREASE TRAPS IN PUBLIC ROW.
 SUGGEST SIMILAR CONCEPT/PRODUCT AS ?WUNDER COVERS?
  
 3. AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION PERMITTING ADJUST AND FOLLOW
 THE MANUFACTURER?S INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SOIL CELL
 INSTALLATION.
  
 4. REPLACE TREE GRATES ON THE WESTERN SIDE OF NORTH
 RAILROAD AVENUE WITH BASE PLANTINGS INSTEAD.
  
 5. ENHANCE THE VARIETY OF THE BASE PLANTING ON THE EAST
 SIDE OF NORTH RAILROAD AVENUE. BASE PLANTING PALETTE
 CAN MATCH WEST/EAST SIDE.
  
 6. DISTRIBUTE THE BIKE RACKS THROUGHOUT THE STREETSCAPE
 PROJECT, INCLUDE RACKS ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE ROAD.
  
 7. PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS TO INCLUDE SOLID PAINTED WHITE
 LINES ON EACH SIDE OF THE STRIPING.
  
 8. DOUBLE CHECK AND ADJUST THE CALL OUT NUMBERS FOR
 STREETSCAPE FURNITURE WITHIN THE LANDSCAPE AND
 HARDSCAPE SHEETS.
  
 9. THE FACE OF THE POLES FOR THE PROPOSED STREET LIGHTS
 NEED TO BE PULLED FURTHER AWAY FROM THE STREET/BACK OF
 CURB, RECOMMEND ALIGNING POLES WITH THE STREET TREES.
  
 10. ADJUST MICRO MOBILITY STATION TO MATCH REQUIRED
 CITY DIMENSIONS OF AT LEAST 6?X30?.
  
 11. SHEETS L0-002 AND L0-0003 SHOW 48 ON-STREET PARKING
 SPACES, PLEASE IDENTIFY REMAINING 8 SPACES THAT ARE TO
 BE REMOVED.
  
 12. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT LARGE AREAS WITH JUST BARK
 NUGGETS, PLEASE CLARIFY ITS APPLICATION OR INCLUDE
 ADDITIONAL BASE PLANTINGS WITHIN THE PLANTING BEDS.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-13-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By ckimmerl Date 10-13-2021 Time 12:21 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ckimmerl Date 10-13-2021 Time 12:21 Sent To  
Notes
2021-10-13 12:20:551. [NOT SATISFIED] PLEASE IDENTIFY THE FINISH FLOOR
 ELEVATION OF THE EXISTING BUILDINGS ON WEST SIDE OF
 RAILROAD AVENUE TO CONFIRM THERE ARE NO ISSUES WITH
 MEETING THE PROPOSED CURBLESS STREET DESIGN.
 - PLEASE PROVIDE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS OF THE
 EXISTING BUILDINGS ON THE WEST SIDE OF NORTH RAILROAD
 AVENUE IN SECTION DRAWINGS. NOT SEEN IN THE REFERENCED
 L1-100, C2.1 AND C2.2 SHEETS.
  
 2. [NOT SATISFIED] PLEASE LIST TOTAL NUMBER OF EXISTING
 ON-STREET PARKING SPACES VS PROPOSED.
 - PLEASE LIST THE TOTAL NUMBER OF EXISTING ON-STREET
 PARKING SPACES VS. PROPOSED. NOT SEEN IN REFERENCED
 L0-003 SHEET.
  
 3. [NOT SATISFIED} IF OVERHEAD POWER LINES ARE GOING
 UNDERGROUND, PLEASE IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF THE ABOVE
 GROUND TRANSFORMERS.
 - PLEASE SHOW ON THE LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL PLANS THE
 EXACT LOCATION OF THE FPL HIGH VOLTAGE SWITCH CABINET
 DESCRIBED IN THE RESPONSE (A.) AT N RAILROAD AVE
 BETWEEN 7TH AND 8TH.
 - PLEASE INDICATE IN THE DRAWINGS THE LOCATION OF THE
 NEW TRANSFORMER VAULT DESCRIBED IN COMMENT (D.) AT
 ADDRESS 809 AND 925.
  
 4. [SATISFIED] STREET TREES SURROUNDED BY HARDSCAPE
 SHALL INCORPORATE SOME TYPE OF SUSPENDED PAVEMENT
 SYSTEM TO ENSURE TREE VIABILITY. MINIMUM SIZE OF
 SUSPENDED PAVER SYSTEM TBD.
 - ARE PERMEABLE PAVERS BEING PROPOSED?
  
 5. [SATISFIED] SOME OF THE PROPOSED TREES ON THE WEST
 SIDE ARE IN VERY NARROW PLANTING AREAS. PLEASE ALLOW
 ADDITIONAL SPACE FOR THE TREES.
  
 6. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] BONDED RUBBER MULCH IS NOT
 AUTHORIZED AT THIS POINT FOR USE IN PLANTING AREAS.
 - BONDED RUBBER MULCH IS STILL PROPOSED WITHIN THE
 ?STREETSCAPE VERGE? WHERE IS THIS WITHIN THE
 PLANS/DRAWINGS, ARE THESE ?STREETSCAPE VERGES? PART OF
 THE PLANTING AREAS?
  
 7. [SATISFIED] SOME PUBLIC SEATING SHALL BE
 INCORPORATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF RAILROAD AVENUE.
  
 8. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] HAVE THERE BEEN ANY
 DISCUSSIONS ABOUT ALLOWING SOME LIMIT NUMBER OF
 ON-STREET PARKING SPACES TO USE FOR DROP OFF AND PICK
 UP AND LOADING?
 - IS THE SINGLE DROP-OFF/LOADING SPACE SUFFICIENT FOR
 THE WESTERN SIDE OF THE ROAD AT 8TH AND N RAILROAD AVE?
 MAY WANT TO ACCOMMODATE CARS/TRUCKS COMING FROM 11TH
 STREET SOUTH.
 - POSSIBLY INCLUDE LOADING/DROP-OFF SPACE ONE PER
 BLOCK? FURTHER DISCUSSION IS NEEDED WITH TRAFFIC
 ENGINEERING.
  
 9. [NOT SATISFIED] PLEASE PROVIDE PHOTOMETRICS FOR THE
 STREET AND INCLUDE FIXTURE AND POLE DETAILS.
 - THERE ARE GAPS IN THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN, THE
 PHOTOMETRIC CALCULATIONS SHALL SPAN THE ENTIRE
 SITE/STREETSCAPE. PLEASE SHOW ILLUMINATION LEVELS ON
 THE SIDEWALK AREAS ALSO.
  
 10. [NOT SATISFIED] PLEASE INCLUDE ALL UTILITY
 LOCATIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS TO IDENTIFY ANY
 POSSIBLE CONFLICTS.
 - PLEASE SHOW ON THE LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL PLANS THE
 EXACT LOCATION OF THE FPL HIGH VOLTAGE SWITCH CABINET
 DESCRIBED IN THE RESPONSE (A.) AT N RAILROAD AVE
 BETWEEN 7TH AND 8TH.
 - PLEASE INDICATE IN THE DRAWINGS THE LOCATION OF THE
 NEW TRANSFORMER VAULT DESCRIBED IN COMMENT (D.) AT
 ADDRESS 809 AND 925.
  
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS BASED ON RESUBMITTED DOCUMENTS.
  
 1. WHERE WILL THE BACK-OF-HOUSE UTILITIES GO FOR THE
 WESTERN BUILDINGS? GREASE TRAPS? IS THE FEC GRANTING AN
 ACCESS EASEMENT ON THE NARROW PARCEL ALONG THE RAILWAY
 CORRIDOR?
  
 2. WHERE ARE THE DCDV FIRE VALVES LOCATED? CAN THE
 VALVES BE RELOCATED TO INSIDE OF THE BUILDINGS? PLEASE
 INDICATE ANY ABOVEGROUND VALVES/ASSEMBLIES NEEDED FOR
 THE PROJECT DCDV, GAS CONNECTION, FDC, ETC. (WEST SIDE
 RENOVATION)
  
 3. EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTS, WILL THESE UNITS NEED TO BE
 REPLACED, UPDATED WHEN MOVING TO THE PROPOSED
 LOCATIONS?
  
  
  
 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT CHRIS
 KIMMERLY AT 561-822-1426 OR ANA MARIA APONTE AT
 561-822-1439
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-12-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By aaponte Date 05-12-2021 Time 16:20 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aaponte Date 04-13-2021 Time 16:20 Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-12 16:35:061. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION OF THE
 EXISTING BUILDINGS ON WEST SIDE OF RAILROAD AVENUE TO
 CONFIRM THERE ARE NO ISSUES WITH MEETING THE PROPOSED
 CURBLESS STREET DESIGN.
 2. PLEASE LIST TOTAL NUMBER OF EXISTING ON-STREET
 PARKING SPACES VS PROPOSED.
 3. IF OVERHEAD POWER LINES ARE GOING UNDERGROUND,
 PLEASE IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF THE ABOVE GROUND
 TRANSFORMERS.
 4. STREET TREES SURROUNDED BY HARDSCAPE SHALL
 INCORPORATE SOME TYPE OF SUSPENDED PAVEMENT SYSTEM TO
 ENSURE TREE VIABILITY. MINIMUM SIZE OF SUSPENDED PAVER
 SYSTEM TBD.
 5. SOME OF THE PROPOSED TREES ON THE WEST SIDE ARE IN
 VERY NARROW PLANTING AREAS. PLEASE ALLOW ADDITIONAL
 SPACE FOR THE TREES.
 6. BONDED RUBBER MULCH IS NOT AUTHORIZED AT THIS POINT
 FOR USE IN PLANTING AREAS.
 7. SOME PUBLIC SEATING SHALL BE INCORPORATED ON THE
 EAST SIDE OF RAILROAD AVENUE.
 8. HAVE THERE BEEN ANY DISCUSSIONS ABOUT ALLOWING SOME
 LIMIT NUMBER OF ON-STREET PARKING SPACES TO USE FOR DRO
 OFF AN PICK UP AND LOADING?
 9. PLEASE PROVIDE PHOTOMETRICS FOR THE STREET AND
 INCLUDE FIXTURE AND POLE DETAILS.
 10. PLEASE INCLUDE ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS IN THE
 LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS TO IDENTIFY ANY POSSIBLE CONFLICTS.
 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA
 APONTE AT 561-822-1439
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved