Plan Review Details - Project Z21040012
Plan Review Stops For Project Z21040012
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 05-12-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 05-12-2021 Time 20:00 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 05-12-2021 Time 20:00 Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-12 20:01:13NO COMMENTS ON PROPOSED SURFACE PARKING LOTS.
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 4 Status P Date 05-10-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 05-10-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 05-10-2022 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-05-10 18:58:40-PROPOSED IRRIGATION METERED WATER SERVICES WOULD
 REQUIRE FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL AND REVIEW. NEED
 ADD TO E22030048 OR START NEW ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL.
  
 MARK HURLEY
 FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC UTILITIES
 561-822-2262
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 3 Status F Date 12-22-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 12-22-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 12-22-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-12-22 09:43:50NO COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR,
 ENG. SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098 [email protected] :
  
 COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE
 SUPER., WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-494-2262 OR
 [email protected]:
 -AUTOTURN EXHIBIT DOES NOT SHOW ALL FOUR PARKING LOTS.
 PLEASE ADD THE MISSING ONE.
  
 -SITE PLAN SHOWS ALLEY BETWEEN 8TH AND 9TH ST. AS
 ONE-WAY GOING EAST. IS THAT FOR THE ENTIRE ALLEY? ALSO
 THE ONE-WAY DIRECTION IS NOT CLEAR ON THE CIVIL PLANS.
 ARE ANY ADDITIONAL SIGNS OR PAVEMENT MARKINGS NEEDED?
  
 -SITE PLAN SHOWS SIGNAGE IN MIDDLE OF 9TH ST.
  
 -CIVIL PLANS DO NOT SHOW GAS MAIN AND GAS MAIN VALVE
 THAT RUN IN ALLEY BETWEEN 8TH AND 9TH ST. PLEASE SHOW
 AND LABEL TO ENSURE NO CONFLICTS.
  
 -THERE MAY BE A GAS MAIN IN SOUTH PARKWAY OF 8TH ST.
 PLEASE VERIFY AND SHOW ON CIVIL PLANS IF THERE.
  
 -TWO TRANSFORMERS ARE PROPOSED AT EDGE OF STREETS. DO
 THEY NEED ANY PROTECTION FROM VEHICLE COLLISION?
  
 -ENSURE PROPOSED BIKE RACK AND STREET LIGHT LOCATIONS
 MEET CLEARANCE DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS FROM FIRE HYDRANTS
 AS SHOWN IN STANDARD DETAIL P-8.
  
 -C1.1 AND C1.3 SHOWS WHAT APPEARS TO BE A LIGHT POLE IN
 DRIVEWAY AT 9TH ST. IT WOULD ALSO BE IN CONFLICT WITH
 PROPOSED SEWER UTILITY.
  
 -DO ANY OF THE ELECTRIC UTILITIES, SUCH AS
 TRANSFORMERS, NEED UTILITY EASEMENTS?
  
 -IF PROPOSED SEWER MAIN THAT IS RUNNING THROUGH PARKING
 LOT IS CITY OWNED AND MAINTAINED, THEN THERE SHOULD BE
 A UTILITY EASEMENT SHOWN AND LABELED FOR IT ON C1.1.
  
 -CIVIL PLANS DO NOT SHOW SEVERAL EXISTING WATER
 SERVICES, METERS, BACKFLOWS, AND BOXES FOR THE PARKING
 LOT PROPERTIES. THOSE NEED TO BE ACCOUNTED FOR AND
 PLANNED FURTHER. APPLICANT/PROJECT MAY HAVE TO REMOVE
 OR RELOCATE THEM AND WILL HAVE TO RESOLVE ANY ACCOUNTS
 WITH CITY WPB UTILITY BILLING.
  
 -C1.1 DOES NOT SHOW EXISTING WATER MAIN RUNNING DOWN
 ALLEY BETWEEN 8TH ST. AND 9TH ST. PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL
 TO ENSURE NO CONFLICTS.
  
 -UTILITY EASEMENTS MAY BE REQUIRED FOR METERED WATER
 SERVICES IF ON PRIVATE PROPERTY.
  
 -E.2 SHOWS ELECTRIC PB IN A TREE ON 9TH ST.
  
 -AFTER LOOKING AT PLANS, NOT SURE IF THERE IS
 IRRIGATION FOR THE SOUTHERN THREE PARKING LOTS AND HOW
 IT WILL WORK. THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS OR
 CONFLICTS DEPENDING ON PROPOSED DESIGN.
  
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 08-10-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 08-10-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 08-10-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-08-10 10:30:39COMMENTS PER RICK ROSSANO, PROJ. COORD. WPB ENG.
 SERVICES, [email protected], 561-494-1098:
 PLEASE SHOW DRY UTILITIES ON RAILROAD AVE.
 PLEASE SHOW IRRIGATION DEMANDS ON ENGINEERING SHEET.
 ON DEMO SHEET, PLEASE ADD NOTE TO PROTECT CATCH BASINS
 ON RAILROAD AVE. ALONG PROJECT FRONTAGE.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD
 CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES,
 PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]:
  
 COMMENTS AS FOLLOWS FOR Z21040012:
 -TRANSFORMER, IRRIGATION METERS, AND BACKFLOW
 ASSEMBLIES APPEARS TO BE PROPOSED IN SAME LOCATION.
 DISTANCE WATER METER BOXES AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES AT
 LEAST 3 FEET AWAY FROM TRANSFORMER. VERIFY NONE OF THEM
 WILL HAVE CONFLICT WITH TREES EITHER.
 -SHOW PROPOSED IRRIGATION METERS AND BACKFLOW
 ASSEMBLIES ON CIVIL/ENGINEERING PLAN.
 -SHOW PROPOSED SEWER MAIN RUNNING THROUGH PARKING LOT
 ON CIVIL/ENGINEERING PLAN. VERIFY IT WILL NOT HAVE
 CONFLICT WITH TREES.
 -ADD NOTE TO IRRIGATION PLAN THAT BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES
 NEED TO BE RP TYPE, LEAD-FREE, AND MEET REQUIREMENTS OF
 WATER SERVICE STANDARD DETAIL WS-6 REVISION SEP2019.
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-03-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 05-03-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 05-03-2023 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-03 12:06:54COMMENTS PER RICK ROSSANO, PROJ. COORD. WPB ENG.
 SERVICES, [email protected], 561-494-1098:
  
 1. WILL THERE BE IRRIGATION DEMANDS?
 2. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND
 IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED
 AREAS.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD
 CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES,
 PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]:
  
 COMMENTS AS FOLLOWS FOR Z21040012:
  
 -SOME REVIEW COMMENTS FOR Z21040017 WILL APPLY TO
 Z21040012.
 -SHOW AND LABEL ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER SERVICES
 AND WATER METERS FOR THE PARKING LOTS, ALONG WITH WHAT
 IS HAPPENING TO THEM.
 -WILL ANY NEW METERED IRRIGATION WATER SERVICES BE
 NEEDED?
 -TREES AND BIKE RACKS ALONG RAILROAD AVE WOULD CONFLICT
 WITH EXISTING WATER MAIN, IF WATER MAIN IS NOT BEING
 RELOCATED.
 -ARE THE ADJACENT EAST-WEST STREETS AND ALLEYS BEING
 MILLED AND RESURFACED THROUGH THE PROJECT?
 -WILL THE WATER MAIN IN THE ALLEY BETWEEN 8TH AND 9TH
 ST REMAIN IN USE AND FUNCTIONAL AFTER Z21040017 AND
 Z21040012 PROJECTS ARE COMPLETE?
  
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS.
 RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT
 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 05-06-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 05-06-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 04-29-2021 Time 16:16 Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-06 12:08:40FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES.
  
 FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES NOT
 CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT THE
 APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 06-01-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 06-01-2022 Time 10:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 06-01-2022 Time 10:48 Sent To  
Notes
2022-06-01 10:48:26FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 8TH ST AND RAILROAD AVE PARKING LOTS Z21040012
 MAY 31, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
 1. SATISFIED. ADD TREES #19 MANGO AND #15 QUEEN PALM TO
 THE TREE DISPOSITION LIST AND CALCULATE THE MITIGATION
 DUE. MAHOGANY TREES #17 AND #18 ARE NOT IN GOOD
 CONDITION DUE TO PRUNING FOR FPL LINE CLEARANCE AND
 CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED EXFILTRATION SO DO NOT HAVE
 TO BE PRESERVED. SHOW ON DISPOSITION LIST AS REMOVE AND
 CALCULATE THE MITIGATION DUE. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET
 IN CANOPY DIAMETER AND PALMS ARE CALCULATED BY
 CATEGORY, AND ANY TREES 20 FEET IN CANOPY DIAMETER OR
 GREATER USE THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE. PROVIDE THE
 TOTAL MITIGATION DUE.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CANOPY CREDIT CALCULATIONS FOR
 TREES PROPOSED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANT LIST TO SHOW
 CANOPY MITIGATION DUE IS PROVIDED.
  
 3. SATISFIED. LANDSCAPE TERMINAL ISLANDS AND INTERIOR
 ISLANDS ARE REQUIRED TO MEASURE AT LEAST 8 FEET IN
 WIDTH FOR THE LANDSCAPE AREA PER SECTION 94-443(C)A.
 AND B. REQUIRED BUFFER OF 5 FEET MAY BE COUNTED AS PART
 OF THE WIDTH AND THEN THE ADDITIONAL 3 FEET INCLUDED.
 THERE ARE 7 TERMINAL ISLANDS AND 4 INTERIOR ISLANDS
 THAT DO NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENT.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(2), PROVIDE THE
 CALCULATIONS FOR THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF BUFFER TREES AT
 30 FOOT INTERVALS AND THE REQUIRED HEDGE FOR EACH
 BUFFER SEGMENT ON EACH PARCEL AND SHOW THE NUMBER OF
 PROVIDED TREES FOR EACH BUFFER SECTION. DRIVEWAYS ARE
 NOT DEDUCTED FOR EACH PROPERTY LINE SEGMENT
 MEASUREMENT. REQUIRED TERMINAL ISLAND TREES MAY NOT BE
 COUNTED TOWARD BUFFER REQUIRED TREES.
 CALCULATIONS MUST BE PROVIDED IN A CHART.
  
  
 5. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A
 MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO
 BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING
 AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. PROVIDE THE
 CALCULATIONS FOR EACH PARCEL. BLOCK 8 AND 9A APPEAR TO
 FALL SHORT OF THE 75%.
 CALCULATIONS MUST BE PROVIDED IN A CHART.
  
 6. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING
 AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND
 LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH
 SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4) FOR EACH PARCEL.
  
 AREAS NEED TO MATCH THE CLASSIFICATIONS AS SHOWN IN
 FIGURE XIV-1 FOR THE PROVIDED INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA.
 BUFFERS ARE NOT COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE.
  
 7. SATISFIED. STREETSCAPE PLANTINGS FOR RAILROAD AVENUE
 ARE INCLUDED WITH THESE PLANS BUT WILL BE PART OF A
 SEPARATE APPLICATION AND APPROVAL. CLARIFY WITH A NOTE
 ON THE PLANS. PLANT LISTS SHOULD BE SEPARATED FOR THE
 STREETSCAPE AND THE ONSITE LANDSCAPING.
  
 8. SATISFIED. TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM SIZE OF 12
 FEET IN HEIGHT AND MEET FLORIDA GRADE #1 STANDARDS.
 CORRECT SIZES ON PLANT LIST.
  
 PIMENTA RACEMOSE IS STILL LISTED AT 10 FEET AND DOES
 NOT MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT.
  
 9. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. SHOW LIGHTING LOCATIONS ON
 THE TREE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH TREES.
  
 10. SATISFIED. THERE APPEARS TO BE A STREET LIGHT POLE
 IN THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY ONTO 9TH ST. THAT WILL NEED TO
 BE RELOCATED.
 11. SATISFIED. CONSIDER HAVING THE ADA CONNECTION FOR
 BLOCK 8 CONNECT TO RAILROAD AVENUE RATHER THAN 8TH ST.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 9/7/21:
  
 12. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE PHOTO TO SHOW A GREEN
 BUTTONWOOD TREE AS LABELED. THE PHOTO IS OF A SILVER
 BUTTONWOOD. SHEET
  
 13. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. IN FLORIDA FRIENDLY POINTS
 CHART, 51% OR MORE CAN ONLY BE COUNTED ONCE IN EACH
 DESIGN OPTION. 4. SHRUBS AND 5. TREES HAVE 2 CATEGORIES
 THAT ADD UP TO MORE THAN 100%. SHEET L0-003.
  
 14. SATISFIED. REMOVE REFERENCE TO OPEN SPACE FROM
 LANDSCAPE AREA LINE AND RELABEL CHART AS ?OPEN SPACE
 AREAS?. SHEET L0-003
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PLAN
 APPROVAL, THE PLANS SHALL BE REVISED TO CORRECT THE
 FLORIDA FRIENDLY POINTS CHART, AS 51% OR MORE CAN ONLY
 BE COUNTED ONCE IN EACH DESIGN OPTION. 3. GROUNDCOVERS,
 4. SHRUBS AND 5. TREES HAVE 2 CATEGORIES THAT ADD UP TO
 MORE THAN 100%. SHEET L0-003. PROVIDE THE LOCATIONS OF
 THE EXTRA TREES FOR 6. B. OR REMOVE POINTS.
  
  
 3. AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING FOR INSTALLATION OF THE
 PARKING LOTS, THE REQUIRED STREET TREES ON 8TH AND 9TH
 STREETS ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY LINES OF THE LOTS
 SHALL BE INSTALLED PER SECTION 94-113. LIVE OAKS SHALL
 BE PREFERRED.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PLAN
 APPROVAL, THE PLANS SHALL BE REVISED TO RELOCATE THE
 ADA ACCESS OUT OF THE TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS FOR
 BLOCK 8A AND 9A.
  
 5. SATISFIED. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PLAN
 APPROVAL, THE LANDSCAPE PLANS SHALL BE REVISED TO SHOW
 THE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH
 TREES.
  
  
 6. ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT INCLUDING FPL
 TRANSFORMERS SHALL BE SCREENED WITH HEDGES.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 12-20-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 12-20-2021 Time 15:41 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 12-20-2021 Time 15:41 Sent To  
Notes
2021-12-20 15:42:18FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 8TH ST AND RAILROAD AVE PARKING LOTS Z21040012
 DECEMBER 20, 2021
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
 1. SATISFIED. ADD TREES #19 MANGO AND #15 QUEEN PALM TO
 THE TREE DISPOSITION LIST AND CALCULATE THE MITIGATION
 DUE. MAHOGANY TREES #17 AND #18 ARE NOT IN GOOD
 CONDITION DUE TO PRUNING FOR FPL LINE CLEARANCE AND
 CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED EXFILTRATION SO DO NOT HAVE
 TO BE PRESERVED. SHOW ON DISPOSITION LIST AS REMOVE AND
 CALCULATE THE MITIGATION DUE. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET
 IN CANOPY DIAMETER AND PALMS ARE CALCULATED BY
 CATEGORY, AND ANY TREES 20 FEET IN CANOPY DIAMETER OR
 GREATER USE THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE. PROVIDE THE
 TOTAL MITIGATION DUE.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CANOPY CREDIT CALCULATIONS FOR
 TREES PROPOSED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANT LIST TO SHOW
 CANOPY MITIGATION DUE IS PROVIDED.
  
 3. SATISFIED. LANDSCAPE TERMINAL ISLANDS AND INTERIOR
 ISLANDS ARE REQUIRED TO MEASURE AT LEAST 8 FEET IN
 WIDTH FOR THE LANDSCAPE AREA PER SECTION 94-443(C)A.
 AND B. REQUIRED BUFFER OF 5 FEET MAY BE COUNTED AS PART
 OF THE WIDTH AND THEN THE ADDITIONAL 3 FEET INCLUDED.
 THERE ARE 7 TERMINAL ISLANDS AND 4 INTERIOR ISLANDS
 THAT DO NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENT.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(2), PROVIDE THE
 CALCULATIONS FOR THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF BUFFER TREES AT
 30 FOOT INTERVALS AND THE REQUIRED HEDGE FOR EACH
 BUFFER SEGMENT ON EACH PARCEL AND SHOW THE NUMBER OF
 PROVIDED TREES FOR EACH BUFFER SECTION. DRIVEWAYS ARE
 NOT DEDUCTED FOR EACH PROPERTY LINE SEGMENT
 MEASUREMENT. REQUIRED TERMINAL ISLAND TREES MAY NOT BE
 COUNTED TOWARD BUFFER REQUIRED TREES.
 CALCULATIONS MUST BE PROVIDED IN A CHART.
  
  
 5. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A
 MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO
 BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING
 AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. PROVIDE THE
 CALCULATIONS FOR EACH PARCEL. BLOCK 8 AND 9A APPEAR TO
 FALL SHORT OF THE 75%.
 CALCULATIONS MUST BE PROVIDED IN A CHART.
  
 6. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING
 AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND
 LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH
 SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4) FOR EACH PARCEL.
  
 AREAS NEED TO MATCH THE CLASSIFICATIONS AS SHOWN IN
 FIGURE XIV-1 FOR THE PROVIDED INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA.
 BUFFERS ARE NOT COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE.
  
 7. SATISFIED. STREETSCAPE PLANTINGS FOR RAILROAD AVENUE
 ARE INCLUDED WITH THESE PLANS BUT WILL BE PART OF A
 SEPARATE APPLICATION AND APPROVAL. CLARIFY WITH A NOTE
 ON THE PLANS. PLANT LISTS SHOULD BE SEPARATED FOR THE
 STREETSCAPE AND THE ONSITE LANDSCAPING.
  
 8. SATISFIED. TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM SIZE OF 12
 FEET IN HEIGHT AND MEET FLORIDA GRADE #1 STANDARDS.
 CORRECT SIZES ON PLANT LIST.
  
 PIMENTA RACEMOSE IS STILL LISTED AT 10 FEET AND DOES
 NOT MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT.
  
 9. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. SHOW LIGHTING LOCATIONS ON
 THE TREE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH TREES.
  
 10. SATISFIED. THERE APPEARS TO BE A STREET LIGHT POLE
 IN THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY ONTO 9TH ST. THAT WILL NEED TO
 BE RELOCATED.
 11. SATISFIED. CONSIDER HAVING THE ADA CONNECTION FOR
 BLOCK 8 CONNECT TO RAILROAD AVENUE RATHER THAN 8TH ST.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 9/7/21:
  
 12. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE PHOTO TO SHOW A GREEN
 BUTTONWOOD TREE AS LABELED. THE PHOTO IS OF A SILVER
 BUTTONWOOD. SHEET
  
 13. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. IN FLORIDA FRIENDLY POINTS
 CHART, 51% OR MORE CAN ONLY BE COUNTED ONCE IN EACH
 DESIGN OPTION. 4. SHRUBS AND 5. TREES HAVE 2 CATEGORIES
 THAT ADD UP TO MORE THAN 100%. SHEET L0-003.
  
 14. SATISFIED. REMOVE REFERENCE TO OPEN SPACE FROM
 LANDSCAPE AREA LINE AND RELABEL CHART AS ?OPEN SPACE
 AREAS?. SHEET L0-003
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 2. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE
 PLANS SHALL BE REVISED TO CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 POINTS CHART, AS 51% OR MORE CAN ONLY BE COUNTED ONCE
 IN EACH DESIGN OPTION. 3. GROUNDCOVERS, 4. SHRUBS AND
 5. TREES HAVE 2 CATEGORIES THAT ADD UP TO MORE THAN
 100%. SHEET L0-003. PROVIDE THE LOCATIONS OF THE EXTRA
 TREES FOR 6. B. OR REMOVE POINTS.
  
  
 3. AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING FOR INSTALLATION OF THE
 PARKING LOTS, THE REQUIRED STREET TREES ON 8TH AND 9TH
 STREETS ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY LINES OF THE LOTS
 SHALL BE INSTALLED PER SECTION 94-113. LIVE OAKS SHALL
 BE PREFERRED.
  
 4. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE
 PLANS SHALL BE REVISED TO RELOCATE THE ADA ACCESS OUT
 OF THE TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS FOR BLOCK 8A AND 9A.
  
 5. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE
 LANDSCAPE PLANS SHALL BE REVISED TO SHOW THE LOCATIONS
 OF LIGHTING TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH TREES.
  
  
 6. ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT INCLUDING FPL
 TRANSFORMERS SHALL BE SCREENED WITH HEDGES.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 09-07-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 09-07-2021 Time 16:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 09-07-2021 Time 16:34 Sent To  
Notes
2021-09-07 16:35:06FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 8TH ST AND RAILROAD AVE PARKING LOTS Z21040012
 SEPTEMBER 7, 2021
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
 1. SATISFIED. ADD TREES #19 MANGO AND #15 QUEEN PALM TO
 THE TREE DISPOSITION LIST AND CALCULATE THE MITIGATION
 DUE. MAHOGANY TREES #17 AND #18 ARE NOT IN GOOD
 CONDITION DUE TO PRUNING FOR FPL LINE CLEARANCE AND
 CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED EXFILTRATION SO DO NOT HAVE
 TO BE PRESERVED. SHOW ON DISPOSITION LIST AS REMOVE AND
 CALCULATE THE MITIGATION DUE. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET
 IN CANOPY DIAMETER AND PALMS ARE CALCULATED BY
 CATEGORY, AND ANY TREES 20 FEET IN CANOPY DIAMETER OR
 GREATER USE THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE. PROVIDE THE
 TOTAL MITIGATION DUE.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CANOPY CREDIT CALCULATIONS FOR
 TREES PROPOSED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANT LIST TO SHOW
 CANOPY MITIGATION DUE IS PROVIDED.
  
 3. SATISFIED. LANDSCAPE TERMINAL ISLANDS AND INTERIOR
 ISLANDS ARE REQUIRED TO MEASURE AT LEAST 8 FEET IN
 WIDTH FOR THE LANDSCAPE AREA PER SECTION 94-443(C)A.
 AND B. REQUIRED BUFFER OF 5 FEET MAY BE COUNTED AS PART
 OF THE WIDTH AND THEN THE ADDITIONAL 3 FEET INCLUDED.
 THERE ARE 7 TERMINAL ISLANDS AND 4 INTERIOR ISLANDS
 THAT DO NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENT.
  
 4. NOT SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(2), PROVIDE THE
 CALCULATIONS FOR THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF BUFFER TREES AT
 30 FOOT INTERVALS AND THE REQUIRED HEDGE FOR EACH
 BUFFER SEGMENT ON EACH PARCEL AND SHOW THE NUMBER OF
 PROVIDED TREES FOR EACH BUFFER SECTION. DRIVEWAYS ARE
 NOT DEDUCTED FOR EACH PROPERTY LINE SEGMENT
 MEASUREMENT. REQUIRED TERMINAL ISLAND TREES MAY NOT BE
 COUNTED TOWARD BUFFER REQUIRED TREES.
 CALCULATIONS MUST BE PROVIDED IN A CHART.
  
  
 5. NOT SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A
 MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO
 BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING
 AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. PROVIDE THE
 CALCULATIONS FOR EACH PARCEL. BLOCK 8 AND 9A APPEAR TO
 FALL SHORT OF THE 75%.
 CALCULATIONS MUST BE PROVIDED IN A CHART.
  
 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE
 PARKING AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS
 AND LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE
 WITH SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4) FOR EACH PARCEL.
  
 AREAS NEED TO MATCH THE CLASSIFICATIONS AS SHOWN IN
 FIGURE XIV-1 FOR THE PROVIDED INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA.
 BUFFERS ARE NOT COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE.
  
 7. SATISFIED. STREETSCAPE PLANTINGS FOR RAILROAD AVENUE
 ARE INCLUDED WITH THESE PLANS BUT WILL BE PART OF A
 SEPARATE APPLICATION AND APPROVAL. CLARIFY WITH A NOTE
 ON THE PLANS. PLANT LISTS SHOULD BE SEPARATED FOR THE
 STREETSCAPE AND THE ONSITE LANDSCAPING.
  
 8. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM
 SIZE OF 12 FEET IN HEIGHT AND MEET FLORIDA GRADE #1
 STANDARDS. CORRECT SIZES ON PLANT LIST.
  
 PIMENTA RACEMOSE IS STILL LISTED AT 10 FEET AND DOES
 NOT MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT.
  
 9. SATISFIED. SHOW LIGHTING LOCATIONS ON THE TREE PLAN
 TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH TREES.
  
 10. SATISFIED. THERE APPEARS TO BE A STREET LIGHT POLE
 IN THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY ONTO 9TH ST. THAT WILL NEED TO
 BE RELOCATED.
 11. SATISFIED. CONSIDER HAVING THE ADA CONNECTION FOR
 BLOCK 8 CONNECT TO RAILROAD AVENUE RATHER THAN 8TH ST.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 9/7/21:
  
 12. CORRECT THE PHOTO TO SHOW A GREEN BUTTONWOOD TREE
 AS LABELED. THE PHOTO IS OF A SILVER BUTTONWOOD. SHEET
  
 13. IN FLORIDA FRIENDLY POINTS CHART, 51% OR MORE CAN
 ONLY BE COUNTED ONCE IN EACH DESIGN OPTION. 4. SHRUBS
 AND 5. TREES HAVE 2 CATEGORIES THAT ADD UP TO MORE THAN
 100%. SHEET L0-003.
  
 14. REMOVE REFERENCE TO OPEN SPACE FROM LANDSCAPE AREA
 LINE AND RELABEL CHART AS ?OPEN SPACE AREAS?. SHEET
 L0-003
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-06-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 05-06-2021 Time 16:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 05-06-2021 Time 16:23 Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-06 16:25:02FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 8TH ST AND RAILROAD AVE PARKING LOTS Z21040012
 MAY 6, 2021
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
 1. ADD TREES #19 MANGO AND #15 QUEEN PALM TO THE TREE
 DISPOSITION LIST AND CALCULATE THE MITIGATION DUE.
 MAHOGANY TREES #17 AND #18 ARE NOT IN GOOD CONDITION
 DUE TO PRUNING FOR FPL LINE CLEARANCE AND CONFLICT WITH
 THE PROPOSED EXFILTRATION SO DO NOT HAVE TO BE
 PRESERVED. SHOW ON DISPOSITION LIST AS REMOVE AND
 CALCULATE THE MITIGATION DUE. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET
 IN CANOPY DIAMETER AND PALMS ARE CALCULATED BY
 CATEGORY, AND ANY TREES 20 FEET IN CANOPY DIAMETER OR
 GREATER USE THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE. PROVIDE THE
 TOTAL MITIGATION DUE.
  
 2. PROVIDE CANOPY CREDIT CALCULATIONS FOR TREES
 PROPOSED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANT LIST TO SHOW CANOPY
 MITIGATION DUE IS PROVIDED.
  
 3. LANDSCAPE TERMINAL ISLANDS AND INTERIOR ISLANDS ARE
 REQUIRED TO MEASURE AT LEAST 8 FEET IN WIDTH FOR THE
 LANDSCAPE AREA PER SECTION 94-443(C)A. AND B. REQUIRED
 BUFFER OF 5 FEET MAY BE COUNTED AS PART OF THE WIDTH
 AND THEN THE ADDITIONAL 3 FEET INCLUDED. THERE ARE 7
 TERMINAL ISLANDS AND 4 INTERIOR ISLANDS THAT DO NOT
 MEET THE REQUIREMENT.
  
 4. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(2), PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS
 FOR THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF BUFFER TREES AT 30 FOOT
 INTERVALS AND THE REQUIRED HEDGE FOR EACH BUFFER
 SEGMENT ON EACH PARCEL AND SHOW THE NUMBER OF PROVIDED
 TREES FOR EACH BUFFER SECTION. DRIVEWAYS ARE NOT
 DEDUCTED FOR EACH PROPERTY LINE SEGMENT MEASUREMENT.
 REQUIRED TERMINAL ISLAND TREES MAY NOT BE COUNTED
 TOWARD BUFFER REQUIRED TREES.
  
 5. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A MINIMUM OF 75
 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED
 WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING AREA SHALL
 BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR
 EACH PARCEL. BLOCK 8 AND 9A APPEAR TO FALL SHORT OF THE
 75%.
  
 6. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING AREA SURFACE
 CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND LANDSCAPE AREAS
 PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 94-443
 (C)(3) AND (4) FOR EACH PARCEL.
  
 7. STREETSCAPE PLANTINGS FOR RAILROAD AVENUE ARE
 INCLUDED WITH THESE PLANS BUT WILL BE PART OF A
 SEPARATE APPLICATION AND APPROVAL. CLARIFY WITH A NOTE
 ON THE PLANS. PLANT LISTS SHOULD BE SEPARATED FOR THE
 STREETSCAPE AND THE ONSITE LANDSCAPING.
 8. TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM SIZE OF 12 FEET IN
 HEIGHT AND MEET FLORIDA GRADE #1 STANDARDS. CORRECT
 SIZES ON PLANT LIST.
  
 9. SHOW LIGHTING LOCATIONS ON THE TREE PLAN TO AVOID
 CONFLICTS WITH TREES.
  
 10. THERE APPEARS TO BE A STREET LIGHT POLE IN THE
 PROPOSED DRIVEWAY ONTO 9TH ST. THAT WILL NEED TO BE
 RELOCATED.
 11. CONSIDER HAVING THE ADA CONNECTION FOR BLOCK 8
 CONNECT TO RAILROAD AVENUE RATHER THAN 8TH ST.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status P Date 05-07-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 05-07-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 05-07-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-07 13:13:04NO OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 4 Status P Date 07-05-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 07-05-2022 Time 09:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 07-05-2022 Time 10:02 Sent To  
Notes
2022-07-05 10:02:09THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 05-06-2022:
  
 1. [SATISFIED] ON THE CIVIL DRAWINGS, INDICATE BY
 HATCHING AND CALLOUTS, PROPOSED CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION.
  
 2. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ? SLOPE OF THE SOUTH END
 SIDEWALK APPEARS TO BE GREATER THAN 5% (STAFF
 CALCULATES 8.8%) AND WOULD BE CONSIDERED A RAMP AND
 WOULD NEED HANDRAILS, WHICH SHOULD NOT ENCROACH INTO
 THE RIGHT OF WAY. SLOPE OF NORTH SIDEWALK APPEARS TO BE
 4.9%. CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT
 SUBMITTAL] AT THE SOUTH END OF THE MIDDLE PARKING LOT,
 THE SLOPE OF THE SIDEWALK BETWEEN HANDICAP ACCESS AISLE
 AND SIDEWALK ALONG RAILROAD AVE MAY NOT MEET ADA
 CRITERIA. CHECK THE SLOPE OF THE SIDEWALK FROM 9TH
 STREET TO THE NORTH PARKING LOT ALSO.
  
 3. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE SPOT GRADES FOR THE ALLEY NORTH
 OF 9TH STREET. WILL THERE BE A BERM ALONG THE NORTH
 PROPERTY LINE?
  
 4. [SATISFIED] CONSIDER SLOPING THE WEST EDGES OF THE
 PARKING LOTS SO THAT THE WHEEL STOPS DO NOT TRAP WATER.
  
 5. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ? VIEW PORT ON SHEET C1.1 ISN?T
 AT THE SHEET SCALE; CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH THE
 ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.] CHECK THE NORTH-SOUTH
 DIMENSIONS OF ALL THE PARKING AREAS. FOR EXAMPLE, THE
 SOUTH HALF OF THE PARKING LOT BETWEEN THE ALLEY AND 9TH
 STREET MEASURES 50.5 FT BETWEEN THE CURBS OF THE
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS. IF THE SIX PARKING SPACES ARE EACH
 8.5 FEET WIDE, THEN THE DISTANCE SHOULD BE 51 FEET. THE
 NORTH HALF OF THE PARKING LOT SOUTH OF THE ALLEY
 MEASURES 42 FEET BUT FOR FIVE 8.5 FEET WIDE PARKING
 SPACES, THE DISTANCE SHOULD BE 42.5 FEET.
  
 6. [SATISFIED] HOW WAS THE BERM ELEVATIONS DETERMINED
 FOR THE RIGHT SIDE OF SECTIONS A, B, AND C?
  
 7. [SATISFIED] CIVIL PLAN PARKING LAYOUT DOES NOT MATCH
 THE LAYOUT SHOWN ON SHEET SP1 OF 1. FOR EXAMPLE, SHEET
 SP1 OF 1 SHOWS ON EITHER SIDE OF THE 4.5 WIDE STRIP TO
 THE WEST OF THE CENTER PARKING SPACES IN THE NORTH
 PARKING LOT AND THE CIVIL PLANS DOES NOT SHOW THE
 CURBING. EXAMPLE 2, IN THE SAME PARKING LOT, SP1 OF 1
 DOES NOT SHOW CURBING ALONG THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT
 BETWEEN THE HANDICAP PARKING SPACES AND THE DRIVEWAY
 ENTRANCE (AND ALONG THE OTHER OUTER EDGES OF THE
 PARKING AREAS OF THE LOT) AND THE CIVIL PLANS DO.
  
 8. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE DETAIL SHOWING HOW THE PARALLEL
 HANDICAP PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE STRIPED.
  
 9. [SATISFIED] SUGGEST ADDING CENTERLINE STRIPING AT
 STOP BARS SINCE THE ENTRANCES ARE ONLY 20 FEET WIDE.
  
 10. [NOT SATISFIED ? RESPONSE TO COMMENT INDICATED
 SIGNAGE IS FOR WESTBOUND TURNS ONLY. SIGNAGE AND
 STRIPING PLAN DOES NOT SHOW ANY SIGNS RESTRICTING TURNS
 FROM THE PARKING LOT ONTO THE ALLEY; PAVEMENT STRIPING
 SHOWS EASTBOUND TURN ARROWS AT THE PARKING LOT DRIVEWAY
 EXITS TO THE ALLEY. CITY'S ] WILL EASTBOUND TURNS ONTO
 THE ALLEY BE ALLOWED FROM THE PARKING LOTS ON EITHER
 SIDE OF THE ALLEY?
  
 11. [SATISFIED] REPLACE DETAIL SHOWING HAY BALE
 PROTECTION OF INLETS WITH ALTERNATIVE METHOD/MATERIALS.
  
 12. [SATISFIED] THE SITE DEMOLITION PLAN SHOWS THE
 CLOSING OF THE ALLEY.
  
 13. [SATISFIED ? THE VIEWPORT ON SHEET C1.1 MAY NOT BE
 TO THE SHEET SCALE.] THE NORTH EDGE OF THE NORTH
 PARKING LOT IS CUTOFF IN THE PLAN VIEW.
  
 14. [SATISFIED] LOCATE THE CONSTRUCTION ACCESS OUTSIDE
 OF THE RIGHT OF WAY.
  
 15. [SATISFIED] DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AT THE EAST END OF
 THE STREETS MAY REQUIRE INLET PROTECTION.
  
 16. [SATISFIED] SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 17. [SATISFIED] SUGGEST LOCATING LIGHT POLES OPPOSITE
 THE STRIPING BETWEEN PARKING SPACES INSTEAD OF OPPOSITE
 THE WHEEL STOPS TO REDUCE THE LIKELIHOOD OF THE LIGHT
 POLE GETTING HIT WHEN ADJACENT TO THE 2-FOOT OVERHANG
 AREA.
  
 CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
 A. RE-DESIGN THE GRADING PLAN TO REDUCE LONGITUDINAL
 SLOPES OF SIDEWALK CONNECTIONS BETWEEN THE PARKING LOTS
 AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY TO LESS THAN 5% SO THAT THEY ARE NOT
 CONSIDERED RAMPS ACCORDING TO THE A.D.A. BUILDING CODE.
  
 B. CORRECT LAYOUT OF SHEET C1.1 SO THAT IT MEETS THE
 SHEET SCALE.
  
 C. STRIPING/SIGNAGE FOR DRIVEWAY EXITS TO THE ALLEY TO
 BE CLARIFIED AND APPROVED BY CITY TRANSPORTATION
 ENGINEER.
  
  
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 3 Status F Date 02-02-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 02-02-2022 Time 16:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 02-02-2022 Time 16:31 Sent To  
Notes
2022-02-02 16:31:45THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 12-10-2021:
  
 1. ON THE CIVIL DRAWINGS, INDICATE BY HATCHING AND
 CALLOUTS, PROPOSED CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION.
  
 2. AT THE SOUTH END OF THE MIDDLE PARKING LOT, THE
 SLOPE OF THE SIDEWALK BETWEEN HANDICAP ACCESS AISLE AND
 SIDEWALK ALONG RAILROAD AVE MAY NOT MEET ADA CRITERIA.
 CHECK THE SLOPE OF THE SIDEWALK FROM 9TH STREET TO THE
 NORTH PARKING LOT ALSO.
  
 3. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES FOR THE ALLEY NORTH OF 9TH
 STREET. WILL THERE BE A BERM ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY
 LINE?
  
 4. CONSIDER SLOPING THE WEST EDGES OF THE PARKING LOTS
 SO THAT THE WHEEL STOPS DO NOT TRAP WATER.
  
 5. CHECK THE NORTH-SOUTH DIMENSIONS OF ALL THE PARKING
 AREAS. FOR EXAMPLE, THE SOUTH HALF OF THE PARKING LOT
 BETWEEN THE ALLEY AND 9TH STREET MEASURES 50.5 FT
 BETWEEN THE CURBS OF THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS. IF THE SIX
 PARKING SPACES ARE EACH 8.5 FEET WIDE, THEN THE
 DISTANCE SHOULD BE 51 FEET. THE NORTH HALF OF THE
 PARKING LOT SOUTH OF THE ALLEY MEASURES 42 FEET BUT FOR
 FIVE 8.5 FEET WIDE PARKING SPACES, THE DISTANCE SHOULD
 BE 42.5 FEET.
  
 6. HOW WAS THE BERM ELEVATIONS DETERMINED FOR THE RIGHT
 SIDE OF SECTIONS A, B, AND C?
  
 7. CIVIL PLAN PARKING LAYOUT DOES NOT MATCH THE LAYHOUT
 SHOWN ON SHEET SP1 OF 1. FOR EXAMPLE, SHEET SP1 OF 1
 SHOWS ON EITHER SIDE OF THE 4.5 WIDE STRIP TO THE WEST
 OF THE CENTER PARKING SPACES IN THE NORTH PARKING LOT
 AND THE CIVIL PLANS DOES NOT SHOW THE CURBING. EXAMPLE
 2, IN THE SAME PARKING LOT, SP1 OF 1 DOES NOT SHOW
 CURBING ALONG THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT BETWEEN THE HANDICAP
 PARKING SPACES AND THE DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE (AND ALONG THE
 OTHER OUTER EDGES OF THE PARKING AREAS OF THE LOT) AND
 THE CIVIL PLANS DO.
  
 8. PROVIDE DETAIL SHOWING HOW THE PARALLEL HANDICAP
 PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE STRIPED.
  
 9. SUGGEST ADDING CENTERLINE STRIPING AT STOP BARS
 SINCE THE ENTRANCES ARE ONLY 20 FEET WIDE.
  
 10. WILL EASTBOUND TURNS ONTO THE ALLEY BE ALLOWED FROM
 THE PARKING LOTS ON EITHER SIDE OF THE ALLEY?
  
 11. REPLACE DETAIL SHOWING HAY BALE PROTECTION OF
 INLETS WITH ALTERNATIVE METHOD/MATERIALS.
  
 12. THE SITE DEMOLITION PLAN SHOWS THE CLOSING OF THE
 ALLEY.
  
 13. THE NORTH EDGE OF THE NORTH PARKING LOT IS CUTOFF
 IN THE PLAN VIEW.
  
 14. LOCATE THE CONSTRUCTION ACCESS OUTSIDE OF THE RIGHT
 OF WAY.
  
 15. DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AT THE EAST END OF THE STREETS
 MAY REQUIRE INLET PROTECTION.
  
 16. SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 17. SUGGEST LOCATING LIGHT POLES OPPOSITE THE STRIPING
 BETWEEN PARKING SPACES INSTEAD OF OPPOSITE THE WHEEL
 STOPS TO REDUCE THE LIKELIHOOD OF THE LIGHT POLE
 GETTING HIT WHEN ADJACENT TO THE 2-FOOT OVERHANG AREA.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-06-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 10-06-2021 Time 10:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 10-06-2021 Time 10:41 Sent To  
Notes
2021-10-06 10:41:19THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 7/19/2021 SUBMITTAL:
  
 1. CHECK THE SCALE FOR THE CIVIL PLANS.
  
 2. REVIEW THE PROPOSED GRADING OF 9TH STREET. THE NORA
 STREETSCAPE PLANS SHOW 14.70 FEET NAVD FOR THE CATCH
 BASIN RIM ELEVATIONS EAST OF THE PARKING LOT ENTRANCES.
  
 3. SHOW A DASHED LINE FOR THE LANDSCAPE OVERHANG FOR
 THE PARKING SPACES. THE HANDICAP PARKING SIGN SHOULD BE
 LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE OVERHANG AREA.
  
 4. WHAT IS THE HATCHED AREA ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 9TH
 STREET, EAST OF THE PROPOSED BIKE RACK? IT DOES NOT
 APPEAR ON THE ARCHITIECTURAL SITE PLAN.
  
 5. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS AT NORTH AND SOUTH PROPERTY
 LINES, PREFERABLY AT DRIVEWAYS, FROM CENTERLINE OF THE
 RIGHT OF WAY TO 10 FEET OF PAVEMENT AREA.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-08-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 05-08-2021 Time 23:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 05-08-2021 Time 23:28 Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-08 23:27:41THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. LABEL THE VERTICAL DATUM AND PROVIDE THE CONVERSION
 EQUATION TO NGVD1929 ON THE SURVEY SHEETS AND
 ENGINEERING PLANS WITH ELEVATION INFORMATION.
  
 2. ADD FLOW ARROWS FOR SURFACE DRAINAGE ON SHEET C1.1.
  
 3. CONSIDER REDUCING THE DEPTH OF THE PARKING STALLS
 AND PROVIDE TWO FEET OF LANDSCAPE OVERHANG.
  
 4. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS OF EACH PARKING LOT FROM
 PROPERTY LINE TO PROPERTY LINE IN EACH DIRECTION.
  
 5. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP
 CRITERIA.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
  
 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED
 WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 3. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP PERMIT.
  
 4. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED WITH THE
 ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 09-23-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 09-23-2021 Time 09:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-09-23 09:41:09SEE COMMENTS UNDER Z21040017.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-07-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 05-07-2021 Time 09:15 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-07 10:21:53INCLUDES REVIEW OF Z21040017
  
 1. OVERALL ALTA SURVEY MISSING PROPERTY CORNER
 INFORMATION.
 2. WILL FPL BE UNDERGOUNDED? IF NOT, THERE ARE
 CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSED PARKING LOT DRIVEWAYS
 AND FUTURE SIDEWALKS. IF YES, TRANSFORMER PAD LOCATIONS
 WILL NEED TO BE DETERMINED ALONG WITH
 CABLE/ATT BOXES.
 3. STREETSCAPE WILL REQUIRE "FACE OF THE CITY".
 4. UNITY OF TITLE WILL BE REQUIRED FOR PARKING AREAS.
 5. NEED TO SEE CROSS-SECTIONS OF EACH BUILDING
 ENTRANCE/FINISH FLOOR WITH PROPOSED STREETSCAPE.
 6. AS AREA IN REAR OF BUILDINGS IS FEC RIGHT-OF-WAY,
 DETAILS WILL NEED TO BE WORKED OUT CONCERNING ANY
 FUTURE GREASE TRAPS, ETC.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 06-06-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 06-06-2022 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2022-06-06 18:00:13APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:
 FURTHER DISCUSS, AND POSSIBLY REVISE, SIGNAGE AND
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS AT STOP LOCATIONS PRIOR TO CO.
  
 SITE COMMENTS
 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS USING A
 HANDICAP VAN AS DESIGN VEHICLE
 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING STALL ANGLE AND REFER TO
 FIGURE XV-2 OF CITY CODE SEC. 94-485 FOR THE
 CORRESPONDING MINIMUM DRIVING AISLE WIDTH. SHEET L1-001
 DOES NOT PROVIDE THE PARKING ANGLE NOR DRIVEWAYS? WIDTH
 3) SATISFIED. PARKING STALLS #7 AND #12 AT THE NORTHERN
 PARKING LOT ARE NOT FEASIBLE; PLEASE REMOVE THEM OR
 PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS SHOWCASING NO ENCROACHMENT
 BETWEEN VEHICLES PARKED AT STALLS #7 AND #8, AND #11
 AND #12.
 4) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY
 ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20
 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS
 (CIRCUIT BOX AND ELECTRIC CONDUIT)
 5) SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF BICYCLE
 PARKING SPACES. CONSIDERING THE RESIDENTIAL
 NEIGHBORHOOD, IT WOULD BE IDEAL TO PROVIDE MORE BICYCLE
 RACKS THAN THE MINIMUM REQUIRED.
 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TABLE SUMMARIZING THE NUMBER OF
 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED, INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE
 ONES
 7) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MINIMUM 5-FOOT SIDEWALK ALONG
 8TH AND 9TH ST
 8) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MINIMUM 10-FOOT SIDEWALK ALONG
 RAILROAD AVENUE. THE PROPOSED 6 FEET SIDEWALK MAY BE
 OK; HOWEVER, PLEASE INDICATE ON SITE PLANS LOCATION OF
 THE SEATING AREAS AND DIMENSIONS OF LANDSCAPE AND
 SIDEWALK AREAS.
 9) SATISFIED. REPAVE THE ALLEYS ALONG SITE FRONTAGE
 10) SATISFIED. THE SOUTHERNMOST ADA STALL, IN PARKING
 BLOCK 9B, MAY HAVE MANEUVERING ISSUES. A REVISION MAY
 BE NECESSARY, UNLESS AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS IS PROVIDED
 TO PROVE ITS ACCESSIBILITY.
 11) SATISFIED. SITE PLANS IN THE L SERIES SHOW STRAIGHT
 ARROWS AT PARKING LOT DRIVEWAYS, WHILE THE C SERIES
 TURNING ARROWS. PLEASE REVISE FOR SAKE OF CONSISTENCY.
 12) SATISFIED. IN PREVIOUS MEETINGS IT WAS AGREED TO
 CLOSE THE WESTERN END OF THE ALLEY BETWEEN BLOCK 8B AND
 9A; TO MAKE THE ALLEY ONE-WAY EASTBOUND; AND TO PROVIDE
 CORRESPONDING PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGNAGE. PLEASE
 REVISE THE SITE PLAN ACCORDINGLY, UNLESS THIS ITEM IS
 ADDRESSED IN THE NORA STREETSCAPE SUBMISSIONS.
 13) SATISFIED. PROVIDE SHEET NAME-NUMBER SHOWCASING THE
 DIMENSIONS OF TRANSPORTATION ITEMS SUCH AS SIDEWALK,
 DRIVEWAY, PARKING STALL, DRIVE AISLE, ETC.
 14) SATISFIED. PROVIDE SHEET NAME-NUMBER SHOWCASING ALL
 SIGNAGE ELEMENTS. IT IS STRONGLY RECOMMENDED TO CREATE
 A DRAWING SHEET (T SERIES) INCORPORATING ALL
 TRANSPORTATION RELATED FEATURES AND DIMENSIONS
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 12-09-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 12-09-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-12-09 17:06:49SITE COMMENTS
 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS USING A
 HANDICAP VAN AS DESIGN VEHICLE
 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING STALL ANGLE AND REFER TO
 FIGURE XV-2 OF CITY CODE SEC. 94-485 FOR THE
 CORRESPONDING MINIMUM DRIVING AISLE WIDTH. SHEET L1-001
 DOES NOT PROVIDE THE PARKING ANGLE NOR DRIVEWAYS' WIDTH
 3) NOT SATISFIED. PARKING STALLS #7 AND #12 AT THE
 NORTHERN PARKING LOT ARE NOT FEASIBLE; PLEASE REMOVE
 THEM OR PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS SHOWCASING NO
 ENCROACHMENT BETWEEN VEHICLES PARKED AT STALLS #7 AND
 #8, AND #11 AND #12.
 4) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY
 ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20
 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS
 (CIRCUIT BOX AND ELECTRIC CONDUIT)
 5) SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF BICYCLE
 PARKING SPACES. CONSIDERING THE RESIDENTIAL
 NEIGHBORHOOD, IT WOULD BE IDEAL TO PROVIDE MORE BICYCLE
 RACKS THAN THE MINIMUM REQUIRED.
 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TABLE SUMMARIZING THE NUMBER OF
 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED, INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE
 ONES
 7) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MINIMUM 5-FOOT SIDEWALK ALONG
 8TH AND 9TH ST
 8) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MINIMUM 10-FOOT SIDEWALK ALONG
 RAILROAD AVENUE. THE PROPOSED 6 FEET SIDEWALK MAY BE
 OK; HOWEVER, PLEASE INDICATE ON SITE PLANS LOCATION OF
 THE SEATING AREAS AND DIMENSIONS OF LANDSCAPE AND
 SIDEWALK AREAS.
 9) SATISFIED. REPAVE THE ALLEYS ALONG SITE FRONTAGE
 10) NOT SATISFIED. THE SOUTHERNMOST ADA STALL, IN
 PARKING BLOCK 9B, MAY HAVE MANEUVERING ISSUES. A
 REVISION MAY BE NECESSARY, UNLESS AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS
 IS PROVIDED TO PROVE ITS ACCESSIBILITY.
 11) NOT SATISFIED. SITE PLANS IN THE L SERIES SHOW
 STRAIGHT ARROWS AT PARKING LOT DRIVEWAYS, WHILE THE C
 SERIES TURNING ARROWS. PLEASE REVISE FOR SAKE OF
 CONSISTENCY.
 12) NOT SATISFIED. IN PREVIOUS MEETINGS IT WAS AGREED
 TO CLOSE THE WESTERN END OF THE ALLEY BETWEEN BLOCK 8B
 AND 9A; TO MAKE THE ALLEY ONE-WAY EASTBOUND; AND TO
 PROVIDE CORRESPONDING PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGNAGE.
 PLEASE REVISE THE SITE PLAN ACCORDINGLY, UNLESS THIS
 ITEM IS ADDRESSED IN THE NORA STREETSCAPE SUBMISSIONS.
 13) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE SHEET NAME-NUMBER SHOWCASING
 THE DIMENSIONS OF TRANSPORTATION ITEMS SUCH AS
 SIDEWALK, DRIVEWAY, PARKING STALL, DRIVE AISLE, ETC.
 14) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE SHEET NAME-NUMBER SHOWCASING
 ALL SIGNAGE ELEMENTS. IT IS STRONGLY RECOMMENDED TO
 CREATE A DRAWING SHEET (T SERIES) INCORPORATING ALL
 TRANSPORTATION RELATED FEATURES AND DIMENSIONS
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-06-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 10-06-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-10-06 18:50:521) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS USING AN
 HANDICAP VAN AS DESIGN VEHICLE
 2) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING STALL ANGLE AND REFER
 TO FIGURE XV-2 OF CITY CODE SEC. 94-485 FOR THE
 CORRESPONDING MINIMUM DRIVING AISLE WIDTH. SHEET L1-001
 DOES NOT PROVIDE THE PARKING ANGLE NOR DRIVEWAYS? WIDTH
 3) NOT SATISFIED. PARKING STALLS #7 AND #12 AT THE
 NORTHERN PARKING LOT ARE NOT FEASIBLE; PLEASE REMOVE
 THEM OR PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS SHOWCASING NO
 ENCROACHMENT BETWEEN VEHICLES PARKED AT STALLS #7 AND
 #8, AND #11 AND #12.
 4) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY
 ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20
 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS
 (CIRCUIT BOX AND ELECTRIC CONDUIT)
 5) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF
 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES. CONSIDERING THE RESIDENTIAL
 NEIGHBORHOOD, IT WOULD BE IDEAL TO PROVIDE MORE BICYCLE
 RACKS THAN THE MINIMUM REQUIRED.
 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TABLE SUMMARIZING THE NUMBER OF
 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED, INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE
 ONES
 7) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MINIMUM 5-FOOT SIDEWALK ALONG
 8TH AND 9TH ST
 8) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MINIMUM 10-FOOT
 SIDEWALK ALONG RAILROAD AVENUE. THE PROPOSED 6 FEET
 SIDEWALK MAY BE OK; HOWEVER, PLEASE INDICATE ON SITE
 PLANS LOCATION OF THE SEATING AREAS AND DIMENSIONS OF
 LANDSCAPE AND SIDEWALK AREAS.
 9) SATISFIED. REPAVE THE ALLEYS ALONG SITE FRONTAGE
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-07-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 05-07-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-07 11:41:47SITE COMMENTS
 1) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS USING AN HANDICAP VAN AS
 DESIGN VEHICLE
 2) PROVIDE PARKING STALL ANGLE AND REFER TO FIGURE XV-2
 OF CITY CODE SEC. 94-485 FOR THE CORRESPONDING MINIMUM
 DRIVING AISLE WIDTH
 3) IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY ACCESSIBLE
 MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 FEET) AND
 PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS (CIRCUIT BOX
 AND ELECTRIC CONDUIT)
 4) PROVIDE THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING
 SPACES.
 5) PROVIDE A TABLE SUMMARIZING THE NUMBER OF PARKING
 SPACES PROVIDED, INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES
 6) PROVIDE A MINIMUM 5-FOOT SIDEWALK ALONG 8TH AND 9TH
 ST
 7) PROVIDE A MINIMUM 10-FOOT SIDEWALK ALONG RAILROAD
 AVENUE
 8) REPAVE THE ALLEYS ALONG SITE FRONTAGE
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 06-13-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By ckimmerl Date 06-13-2022 Time 08:51 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ckimmerl Date 06-13-2022 Time 08:29 Sent To  
Notes
2022-06-13 08:47:09CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
  
 1. ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT (INCLUDING FPL
 TRANSFORMERS, WATER METERS, BACKFLOWS, AND OTHER GROUND
 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT) SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW WITH
 LANDSCAPE HEDGES.
  
 2. ENTIRE PARKING AISLE WIDTH SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO
 24FT. FOR THE SOUTHERN PARKING LOT BETWEEN ALLEY AND
 8TH ST.
  
 3. AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING FOR INSTALLATION OF THE
 PARKING LOTS, THE REQUIRED STREET TREES ON 8TH AND 9TH
 STREETS ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY LINES OF THE LOTS
 SHALL BE INSTALLED PER SECTION 94-113.
  
 CHRIS KIMMERLY, AICP
 URBAN DESIGN PLANNER 822-1426 [email protected]
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 01-20-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By ckimmerl Date 01-20-2022 Time 14:29 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ckimmerl Date 01-20-2022 Time 13:55 Sent To  
Notes
2022-01-20 14:29:519/02/21 - ZONING COMMENTS
 1. DRIVE AISLE WIDTH ON BLOCK 9B SHALL BE 13 FEET;
 SHOWN AS 12 FT ? 8 INCHES AND 12 FT ? 9 INCHES. PLEASE
 ADJUST PARKING DIMENSIONS TO ACCOMMODATE 13 FT. DRIVE
 AISLE.
 RESPONSE: THE DRIVE AISLES HAVE BEEN INCREASED TO 13
 FEET MINIMUM DIMENSION WHERE APPLICABLE. SEE ZONING
 SITE PLAN. PARKING BLOCK 9B WAS UPDATED. REFER TO NEW
 PARKING LAYOUT L1-110A
 [SATISFIED]
 2. PLEASE PROVIDE APPROPRIATE SIGNAGE OF TURN
 INDICATORS THAT EXPLICITLY PROHIBITS CARS FROM TURNING
 EAST INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD (I.E. ?NO RIGHT TURNS: SIGN
 FOR CARS COMING FROM BLOCK 9A INTO 9TH STREET; ?NO LEFT
 TURNS? FROM CARS COMING FROM BLOCK 9B INTO 9TH STREET;
 ?NO LEFT TURNS? FOR CARS COMING FROM BLOCK 8 INTO 8TH
 STREET, ETC.)
 RESPONSE: UPON MEETING WITH TRAFFIC DIVISION STAFF THE
 APPLICANT HAS UPDATED THE ZONING SITE PLAN TO INCLUDE
 THE REQUESTED TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAGE AS REQUESTED AND
 REQUIRED. SEE ZONING SITE PLAN. SIGNAGE HAS BEEN ADDED
 TO THE PLANS.
 [SATISFIED]
 3. CURB CUTS ON ALL BLOCKS SHOWN AS 24 FT., THESE CAN
 BE REDUCED TO 20 FEET.
 RESPONSE: NOTED. DRIVEWAYS WERE REDUCED TO 20FT. REFER
 TO SHEET L1-110 AND L1-110A.
 [SATISFIED]
 4. CLARIFY/EXPLAIN WHAT THE DOUBLE LINE IS ON SEVERAL
 PLANS BETWEEN THE TWO ALLEYWAY TERMINAL ISLANDS OF
 BLOCK 8 AND BLOCK 9A. IS THIS A CONTINUATION OF THE
 CURB OR A GRAPHIC ERROR? CANNOT JOIN TERMINAL ISLANDS
 AND ELIMINATE THE THOROUGHFARE ON THE ALLEY
 RESPONSE: PLANS HAVE BEEN REVISED TO INDICATE THAT THE
 DOUBLE LINES REPRESENT A FLUSH CONCRETE HEADER CURB
 SEPARATING PAVERS FROM ASPHALT. CALL OUT WAS ADDED ON
 PLANS. REFER TO SHEETS L1-110 STREETSCAPE SET.
 [SATISFIED]
  
  
 ZONING - ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AND/OR CONDITIONS OF
 APPROVAL 1/20/22:
  
 1. ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT (INCLUDING FPL
 TRANSFORMERS, WATER METERS, BACKFLOWS, AND OTHER GROUND
 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT) SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW WITH
 LANDSCAPE HEDGES.
  
 2. THE REQUIRED STREET TREES ALONG THE CORNERS OF 8TH
 AND 9TH STREETS, ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY LINES OF THE
 LOTS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER SECTION 94-113. (SEE
 LANDSCAPE COMMENTS)
  
 3. PLEASE CONSIDER THE RELOCATION OF THE TRANSFORMER ON
 THE SOUTH SIDE OF 9TH STREET. RELOCATE TO THE ALLEY IF
 POSSIBLE. THE TRANSFORMERS AS PROPROSED CURRENTLY HAVE
 A UTILITY CONFLICT WITH LANDSCAPE TREES AND ARE VISIBLE
 FROM STREET.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 09-02-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By ckimmerl Date 09-02-2021 Time 16:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ckimmerl Date 09-02-2021 Time 16:36 Sent To  
Notes
2021-09-02 16:33:58- DRIVE AISLE WIDTH ON BLOCK 9B SHALL BE 13 FT.; SHOWN
 AS 12 FT 8 INCHES AND 12 FT 9 INCHES. PLEASE ADJUST
 PARKING DIMENSIONS TO ACCOMODATE 13 FT. DRIVE AISLE.
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE APPROPRIATE SIGNAGE OR TURN INDICATORS
 THAT EXPLICITLY PROHIBITS CARS FROM TURNING EAST INTO
 THE NEIGHBORHOOD. (I.E. "NO RIGHT TURNS" SIGN FOR CARS
 COMING FROM BLOCK 9A INTO 9TH STREET; "NO LEFT TURNS"
 FOR CARS COMING FROM BLOCK 9B INTO 9TH STREET;"NO LEFT
 TURNS" FOR CARS COMING FROM BLOCK 8 INTO 8TH STREET,
 ETC.)
  
 - CURB CUTS ON ALL BLOCKS SHOWN AS 24 FT, THESE CAN BE
 REDUCED TO 20 FT.
  
 - CLARIFY/EXPLAIN WHAT THE DOUBLE LINE IS ON SEVERAL
 PLANS BETWEEN THE TWO ALLEYWAY TERMINAL ISLANDS OF
 BLOCK 8 AND BLOCK 9A. IS THIS A CONTINUATION OF THE
 CURB OR A GRAPHIC ERROR? CANNOT JOIN TERMINAL ISLANDS
 AND ELIMINATE THE THOROUGHFARE ON THE ALLEY.
  
  
 FOR ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS FEEL FREE TO REACH OUT.
  
  
 CHRIS KIMMERLY
 URBAN DESIGN PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT | PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 2ND FLOOR, WEST PALM BEACH, FL
 33401
 (561)822-1426
  
 ANA MARIA APONTE, AICP, LEED AP
 CITY URBAN DESIGNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET, PO BOX 3147, WEST PALM BEACH, FL
 33401
 DIRECT PHONE: 561-822-1439
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-12-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By aaponte Date 05-12-2021 Time 14:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aaponte Date 04-13-2021 Time 15:31 Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-12 15:02:521. PROPOSED SURFACE PARKING LOT SHAL LCOMPLY WITH
 SURFACE PARKING REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION 94-443C, EXCEPT
 FOR THE DIVIDER MEDIANS.
 2. A MINIMUM 36 INCHES IN HEIGHT WALL OF SOLID FENCE
 SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE TO
 PROTECT THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL USES.
 3. PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS ON ALL PARKING STALL AND
 DRIVE AISLES TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE.
 4. BIKE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED AT A MINIMUM OF 1/100
 FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE.
 5. PLEASE STUDY TRAFFIC CONTROL MEASURES TO AVOID CARS
 EXITING THE SURFACE PARKIGN LOTS TO GO EAST ON 9TH AND
 8TH STREET.
 6. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE EXISTING CURB
 CUTS AND INDICATE IF ANDY RELOCATION OR REALIGNMENT IS
 BEING PROPOSED.
 7. STUDY THE POSIBILITY TO ALIGN THE CURB CUT ON 8TH
 STREET WITH THE DRIVE AISLE. SOME ADDITIONAL SPACES MAY
 BE GAINED.
 8. THE ASPPHALT AREA CAN BE STOPPED AT THE WHEEL STOP
 AND ALLOW ADDITIONAL PLANTING FOR THE LANDSCAPE
 BUFFERS.
 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA
 APONTE 561-822-1439
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved