 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z21040002
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z21040002 |
| Review Stop |
AIPP |
ART IN PUBLIC PLACES |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-01-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
scwelter |
Date |
07-01-2022 |
Time |
11:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
scwelter |
Date |
07-01-2022 |
Time |
11:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-07-01 11:59:50 | ART ASSESSMENT APPLICATION COMPLETED. OPTION 2 | | | INVOICE PREPARED AND SENT TO DEVELOPER WHICH MUST BE | | | PAID PRIOR TO OR AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT FEES. | | | | | | ANY QUESTIONS CONTACT [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
AIPP |
ART IN PUBLIC PLACES |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-16-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
scwelter |
Date |
05-16-2022 |
Time |
14:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
scwelter |
Date |
05-16-2022 |
Time |
14:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-05-16 14:36:49 | NEED TO COMPLETE AN ART ASSESSMENT APPLICATION ASAP - | | | EMAIL [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
AIPP |
ART IN PUBLIC PLACES |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-07-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
scwelter |
Date |
02-07-2022 |
Time |
12:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
scwelter |
Date |
02-07-2022 |
Time |
12:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-02-07 12:55:35 | DEVELOPER MUST COMPLETE AN ART ASSESSMENT APPLICATION | | | AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | TWO OPTIONS: | | | 1. ART ON SITE AT 1% OF TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS | | | OR | | | 2. .75% (-25% OF 1%) INTO THE PUBLIC ART ACCOUNT. | | | | | | EMAIL [email protected] TO OBTAIN AN ART ASSESSMENT | | | APPLICATION. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
AIPP |
ART IN PUBLIC PLACES |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-27-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
scwelter |
Date |
04-27-2021 |
Time |
15:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
scwelter |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-04-27 15:11:33 | PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT: | | | IF TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT ARE | | | OVER $500,000 IT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC ART | | | REQUIREMENT AS PER CITY ORDINANCE. | | | SECTION 78-129: ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, | | | INCLUDING NEW CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR | | | IMPROVEMENT OF AN EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE TOTAL | | | CONSTRUCTION COSTS ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN | | | $500,000 ARE SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT. | | | OPTION 1: INSTALL ARTWORK ON THE DEVELOPMENT SITE | | | VALUED IN AN AMOUNT NOT LESS THAN ONE PERCENT OF THE | | | TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS; OR | | | OPTION 2: CONTRIBUTE AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO 75 PERCENT OF | | | ONE PERCENT OF THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR DEPOSIT | | | TO THE PUBLIC ART ACCOUNT. | | | A COMPLETED PUBLIC ART ASSESSMENT APPLICATION IS | | | REQUIRED AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | PLEASE CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER AT [email protected] OR | | | 561.822.1521 TO OBTAIN AN APPLICATION AND REVIEW THE | | | REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-13-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
05-13-2021 |
Time |
09:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
05-13-2021 |
Time |
09:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-05-13 10:00:59 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AN ASBESTOS | | | SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT | | | REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963, | | | OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 3. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR | | | THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, | | | AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 4. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE | | | REQUIRED. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE | | | AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT TIM LARGE, CHIEF PLUMBING | | | INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561) | | | 805-6692, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 5. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, | | | FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, | | | GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, | | | SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 6. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER | | | AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY, | | | INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE | | | CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION | | | THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY. | | | | | | 7. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT | | | TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE | | | ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP | | | ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC | | | PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | 8. BUILDING ADDRESS. THE ENTRANCES FOR THE NEW | | | BUILDINGS AND TENANTS WILL BE IN DIFFERENT LOCATIONS | | | FROM THE EXISTING. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT | | | WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL | | | HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION | | | OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE ALONG SOUTHERN BLVD. FOR | | | STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING | | | COORDINATOR, AT (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-06-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
05-06-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
05-06-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-19-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
LDeLoren |
Date |
01-19-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
01-19-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-01-26 07:04:59 | COMMENTS FROM MICHAEL TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, WPB | | | PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-494-1047, [email protected] : | | | | | | SHEET C-501 | | | - ADD NOTE TO CUT AND CAP EXISTING 8? CAS PIPE AT THE | | | MAIN DURING REMOVAL. | | | - PROVIDE PROFILE FROM TAP TO POINT OF SERVICE SHOWING | | | EXISTING UTILITIES AND CONFLICTS FOR WATER SERVICES AND | | | FIRE LINE ON NOTTINGHAM BLVD. | | | | | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | CONCERNS, THANKS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-05-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
08-05-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
08-05-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-08-05 07:21:02 | COMMENT PER RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENG. | | | SERVICES DEPT., DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE SHOW PARAMETERS OF UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR | | | PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS IN BLOW UP 1 ON PAGE | | | C-501. | | | | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD | | | CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, | | | PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]: | | | -THERE IS CROSS WALK AT NORTH SIDE OF BUILDING WITH | | | MARKINGS THAT RUN INTO ISLAND CURB. PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | | | -THE ACCESSIBILITY PLAN DOES NOT SHOW ROUTE FROM ROW | | | SIDEWALK TO BANK. IS THERE ONE? | | | | | | -ADD A SMALL UTILITY EASEMENT ALL THE WAY AROUND THE | | | PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT WITH ITS PIPING. | | | | | | -ONE OF THE WATER SERVICES NEAR THE DUMPSTER DOES NOT | | | HAVE PLUMBING PIPE SHOWN. IS IT FOR IRRIGATION? | | | | | | -WILL THE IRRIGATION WATER SERVICE AT NORTH SIDE OF THE | | | PROPERTY IRRIGATE THE SOUTH SIDE OF PROPERTY? | | | | | | -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL: ADD ADDITIONAL GATE | | | VALVES IN THE GRASS AFTER THE SIDEWALK FOR THE | | | FIRELINES NEAR THE DUMPSTER AND LABEL THEM POINT OF | | | SERVICE; LABEL ALL PROPOSED WATER SERVICE PIPE WITH | | | PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL TYPE. | | | | | | -IS THE SEWER LATERAL FOR THE WESTERN BUILDING SHOWN ON | | | THE UTILITY PLAN? | | | | | | -VERIFY THE EXISTING WATER SERVICE SHOWN IN THE AREA OF | | | BLOW UP 1 IS BEING REMOVED, AND ONE OF THE PROPOSED NEW | | | METERED WATER SERVICES WILL CONTINUE PROVIDING WATER | | | SERVICE AFTER PROJECT IS COMPLETED. | | | | | | -THE SEWER LATERALS FOR THE EAST BUILDING AND BANK ARE | | | NOT SHOWN ON UTILITY PLAN. IF THEY ARE CONNECTED TO THE | | | EXISTING 8 INCH CLAY SEWER PIPE AT THE REAR OF THE | | | STORES, WILL THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED SEWER SYSTEMS | | | FUNCTION PROPERLY? | | | | | | -THERE APPEAR TO BE BOLLARDS AROUND THE PROPOSED FIRE | | | HYDRANT. CHECK TO SEE IF THEY COMPLY WITH STANDARD | | | DETAIL P-8. | | | | | | -1.5 INCH METERS REQUIRE 2 INCH SERVICE PIPE BETWEEN | | | THE METER AND WATER MAIN. | | | | | | -PAVEMENT RESTORATION BOUNDARIES ON NOTTINGHAM LOOK | | | SMALLER THAN REQUIRED. CHECK DIMENSIONS NEEDED ON THE | | | TRENCHING OR PAVEMENT RESTORATION STANDARD DETAILS AND | | | ADJUST. | | | | | | -IS THERE AN FDC FOR THE EASTERN PROPOSED 8 INCH DCDA? | | | IF NOT, IS ONE NEEDED? | | | | | | -ARE ANY OF THE PROPOSED RETAIL SHOPS PLANNING TO BE | | | RESTAURANTS? | | | | | | | | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | CONCERNS, THANKS. | | | RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES | | | DEPARTMENT | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-13-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
05-13-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
05-13-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-05-13 08:29:23 | 1. THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF | | | REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY | | | AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND | | | WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. TO VIEW | | | DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER | | | ENGINEERING RELATED DOCUMENTS, CLICK HERE OR GO TO: HTT | | | PS://WWW.WPB.ORG/GOVERNMENT/ENGINEERING/ENGINEERING-FOR | | | MS-PERMITS-AND-APPLICATIONS . | | | 2. CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, | | | FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08, ADOPTED | | | SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18) CHAPTER 90 | | | UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. SEC. 90-7. | | | POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER SERVICE | | | FACILITIES OF THE CITY: | | | THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE | | | CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY | | | BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS, | | | BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION. | | | 3. AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR | | | MORE INFORMATION, CLICK HERE OR GO TO: HTTPS://WWW.WPB. | | | ORG/GOVERNMENT/ENGINEERING/ENGINEERING-FORMS-PERMITS-AN | | | D-APPLICATIONS . | | | 4. PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY | | | OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC | | | RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF | | | YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE | | | MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL | | | IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT | | | [email protected] OR 561-494-1040 FOR FURTHER | | | ASSISTANCE. | | | 5. PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS | | | OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES, | | | INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND | | | SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, | | | METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE | | | SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING | | | GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, | | | ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL | | | INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER | | | LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE | | | PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN | | | VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. | | | PLEASE SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT | | | MATERIAL. ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL | | | EXISTING AND PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, | | | INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & | | | TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL | | | UTILITY CROSSINGS. | | | 6. CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY | | | ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY | | | ROW. | | | 7. PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE | | | DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB | | | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION). | | | 8. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND | | | PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM | | | AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE | | | PER FAC 64E-8 FOR WATER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR SEWER. | | | 9. SHOW VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION INFORMATION | | | (NAVD 88 AND NGVD 29). | | | 10. PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND | | | STORMWATER ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE. | | | 11. PLEASE ADD NOTE TO PLANS SPECIFYING CITY?S | | | DOWNSTREAM LIFT STATION NUMBER. | | | 12. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND | | | IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED | | | AREAS. | | | 13. PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR | | | PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS. | | | 14. PLEASE LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE | | | APPLICABLE. | | | 15. PLEASE PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED | | | LOCATION OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION. | | | 16. COORDINATE WITH MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE | | | SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING | | | PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT | | | HIM AT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected] | | | 17. PROVIDE DEDICATED UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS | | | FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD | | | CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, | | | PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]: | | | -PROPOSED WATER METERS AND ASSOCIATED BACKFLOW | | | ASSEMBLIES NEED TO BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY | | | LINE. | | | | | | -SHOW AND LABEL ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED FIRELINES | | | WATER SERVICES ON THE UTILITY PLAN. THERE MAY BE SOME | | | MISSING. | | | | | | -SINGLE METERED SERVICES ARE STANDARD ? NOT MULTIPLE OR | | | BRANCHED. | | | | | | -SHOW AND LABEL ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER | | | SERVICES, METERS, AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ON THE CIVIL | | | PLANS (DEMO & UTILITY). MAKE SURE LABELS TELL WHAT IS | | | HAPPENING TO THEM. | | | | | | -ADD RP TO LABELS OF DOMESTIC AND IRRIGATION BACKFLOW | | | ASSEMBLIES. | | | | | | -LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER MAINS WITH PIPE SIZE | | | AND MATERIAL TYPE. | | | | | | -SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER GATE VALVES | | | THAT ARE 3 INCHES OR LARGER. | | | | | | -ATTEMPT TO NOT LOCATE WATER MAINS UNDER STRUCTURES OR | | | CONCRETE SLABS. | | | | | | -SHOW AND LABEL ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITY | | | EASEMENTS. FOR EXAMPLE BELLSOUTH EASEMENT IS LABELED ON | | | SURVEY, BUT NOT LABELED ON UTILITY PLAN. | | | | | | -THERE ARE SEVERAL MONITORING WELL LIDS/CAPS AROUND THE | | | SOUTHEAST AREA OF PROPERTY. PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL | | | THOSE, AND PROVIDE MORE DETAIL ABOUT THEM. | | | | | | -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL: ADD SIZES TO LABELS | | | FOR BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES, ADD ELEVATION INFORMATION TO | | | LABELS FOR SEWER MANHOLES. | | | | | | -PLEASE ADD WATER DEMAND CALCULATIONS TO UTILITY PLAN. | | | | | | -WILL FPU AND BELLSOUTH ALLOW OTHER UTILITIES TO CROSS | | | THEIR EASEMENTS? | | | | | | -SEVERAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ENCROACH INTO FPU EASEMENT. | | | IS THAT ACCEPTABLE? | | | | | | -PLEASE SHOW PROPOSED UTILITIES ON LANDSCAPING PLAN SO | | | ANY CONFLICTS CAN BE IDENTIFIED. | | | | | | -SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITIES FOR THE | | | BANK NEAR NORTHEAST CORNER OF PROPERTY. | | | | | | -ENSURE THAT ALL FIRELINES WILL HAVE ADEQUATE WATER IF | | | USED AT THE SAME TIME. | | | | | | -THERE APPEARS TO BE WATER METER AT THE NORTH PROPERTY | | | LINE ADJACENT SOUTHERN BLVD. WILL IT REMAIN AND WHAT | | | WILL IT BE USED FOR? | | | | | | -ROOT BARRIERS MAY NEED TO BE INSTALLED WHERE TREES ARE | | | CLOSE TO UTILITY LINES. (SUCH AS THE TREES NEAR THE GAS | | | PIPING) | | | | | | -ANY PROPOSED DOMESTIC WATER METERS 3 INCHES AND LARGER | | | MUST BE CONSTRUCTED ABOVE-GROUND. | | | | | | -WILL THE STORES THAT ARE NOT BEING DEMOLISHED BE OPEN | | | DURING DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION? | | | | | | | | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | CONCERNS, THANKS. | | | RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES | | | DEPARTMENT | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 [email protected] | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-12-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
01-12-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
01-12-2022 |
Time |
14:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-01-12 14:38:21 | AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESUBMITTAL PACKET THE | | | PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS | | | APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | | | HOWEVER, THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED | | | PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR | | | APPROVAL. | | | | | | THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT | | | THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-06-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
05-06-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
04-29-2021 |
Time |
16:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-05-06 12:56:48 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE INTENDED | | | TO PROVIDE GUIDANCE FOR BUILDING PLAN SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE | | | OCCUPANCY TYPE, PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | AND WHETHER IT IS MIXED OR SEPARATED OCCUPANCY. | | | | | | 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE | | | LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER | | | SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED | | | ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | THE PROPOSED LOCATIONS OF THE FIRE HYDRANT AND FDC ARE | | | ACCEPTABLE WITH ANY CHANGES CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH | | | THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | 9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER | | | THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY | | | ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM, | | | ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FS 61G AND | | | SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PERMIT. | | | | | | 9A) THE LOCATION OF ANY APPLICABLE DDCV AND FIRE LINE | | | LOCATIONS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND | | | SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, | | | THE CITY'S ENGINEERS OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND | | | THE CITY'S PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE. | | | | | | 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 11. MINIMUM TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS RADIO STRENGTH | | | IS REQUIRED PER NFPA 1 & 72 | | | | | | ANY REQUIRED SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO | | | SIGNAL STRENGTH OF -95 DBM FOR THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE. TESTING SHALL BE BY AN | | | ACCEPTABLE NATIONAL STANDARD DOCUMENTING PERCENTAGES | | | NOTED ABOVE AND BY ACTUAL RADIO TESTING BY FIRE | | | PERSONNEL. IF THE MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A | | | BI-DIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH | | | A MINIMUM 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP. | | | | | | PLEASE CONTACT MARK FILLA, PALM BEACH COUNTY PUBLIC | | | SAFETY RADIO SYSTEMS MANAGER, [email protected], | | | 561-233-0837; AS OUR RADIOS OPERATE ON THEIR SYSTEM FOR | | | DETAILED RADIO FREQUENCY AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. | | | | | | 12. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE | | | SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY | | | DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS. | | | | | | 13. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 14. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-18-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
07-18-2022 |
Time |
11:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
07-18-2022 |
Time |
11:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-07-18 11:51:25 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: SOUTHDALE PLAZA PUBLIX Z21040002 | | | JULY 18, 2022 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-441(C)(2), THE VALUE OF | | | THE PERMIT WILL EXCEED 50% OF THE VALUE OF THE | | | STRUCTURE, SO THE SITE MUST BE BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE CURRENT LANDSCAPE CODE REQUIREMENTS. | | | THE APPLICANT WAS GIVEN THE LANDSCAPE CODE REQUIREMENTS | | | AT A PRE APPLICATION MEETING, AND THE EXISTING SITE | | | CONDITIONS WERE REVIEWED. IT IS POSSIBLE TO MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SITE AND STAFF IS AVAILABLE TO | | | REVIEW ANY POSSIBILITIES. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. REQUIRED OPEN SPACE FOR THIS ZONING | | | CATEGORY TO CALCULATE REQUIRED TREES, FLOWERING TREES | | | AND SHRUBS PER SECTION 94-442(C)(2)B. AND (3) IS 40% OF | | | THE ENTIRE SITE. REFLECT THIS SQUARE FOOTAGE ON THE | | | SITE DATA AND LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS. | | | 8/16/21 TOTAL SITE AREA IS 380,133 SQ FT. 40% IS | | | 152,053.2 SQ FT. THESE FIGURES ARE TO BE SHOWN ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS. REQUIRED TREES (102), FLOWERING | | | TREES (26) AND SHRUBS (305) ARE CALCULATED ON 152,053.2 | | | SQ FT. CORRECT ALL ITEMS ON CHART. | | | | | | FIGURES NEED TO BE CORRECTED TO REFLECT THE ABOVE | | | CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443 (C)(3)A. REQUIRES A | | | TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND AND REQUIRED TREE FOR EACH | | | ROW OF PARKING. (3)B. REQUIRES AN INTERIOR LANDSCAPE | | | ISLAND WITH A REQUIRED TREE SO THERE ARE NO MORE THAN | | | 10 SPACES IN A ROW. ALL THESE LANDSCAPE AREAS MUST MEET | | | THE MINIMUM WIDTH OF 8 FEET OF LANDSCAPE AREA AND BE | | | THE FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT SPACE. (3) C. REQUIRES | | | DIVIDER MEDIANS WHERE THERE ARE MORE THAN 3 CONSECUTIVE | | | ROWS OF PARKING. ALL AREAS OF PARKING MUST MEET THESE | | | REQUIREMENTS. | | | THERE ARE ISLANDS THAT DO NOT RUN THE LENGTH OF THE | | | PARKING SPACE, AND THAT ARE MINIMIZED BY HAVING | | | SIDEWALKS THROUGH THEM. THE INTENT OF THE CODE IS TO | | | PROVIDE SHADE FOR AS MANY PARKING SPACES AS POSSIBLE | | | AND MINIMIZE THE HEAT ISLAND EFFECT CREATED BY THE | | | ASPHALT. ONLY ONE PARTIAL DIVIDER MEDIAN IS PROVIDED | | | THAT IS ONLY ADJACENT TO 5 PARKING SPACES. | | | | | | THE LENGTH OF THE ISLANDS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED PER | | | DISCUSSIONS WITH THE ENGINEER. CONFIGURATION OF ADA | | | WALKWAYS NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED TO ELIMINATE UNNECESSARY | | | PAVED AREAS REDUCING THE PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A | | | MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO | | | BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING | | | AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE | | | PERCENTAGE OF CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR THE | | | REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS AS REQUIRED BY SECTION | | | 94-443(C)(3) FOR DIVIDER ISLANDS, TERMINAL, AND | | | INTERIOR ISLANDS. THE ONLY TREE SPECIES LISTED ON THE | | | PLANT LIST THAT ARE CATEGORY 1 ARE THE LIVE OAK TREES. | | | | | | 79 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS REQUIRE 60 BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE | | | TREES. LIVE OAK AND GUMBO LIMBO QUALIFY. ONLY 42 ARE | | | PROVIDED, SO STAFF SUGGESTS RELOCATING OR REMOVING | | | EXISTING PALMS AND REPLACING WITH 18 SHADE TREES. | | | | | | THERE ARE NOW 82 LANDSCAPE INTERIOR AND TERMINAL | | | ISLANDS SHOWN. 62 CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES ARE REQUIRED. | | | COCONUT PALMS NEED TO BE REPLACED WITH SHADE TREES. | | | GREEN BUTTONWOOD IS A CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREE. | | | | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING | | | LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION | | | 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS. PROVIDE | | | THE TOTAL REQUIRED AND PROVIDED AS ONE TOTAL FOR BOTH | | | SECTIONS. A SEPARATE EXHIBIT PLAN MUST BE PROVIDED TO | | | SHOW THE AREAS COUNTED FOLLOWING THE DESCRIPTION OF | | | AREAS AS SHOWN IN FIGURE XIV-1. | | | AN EXHIBIT WAS PROVIDED ON SHEET L1.01 BUT IS | | | INCOMPLETE. THE AREA OF PARKING SPACES NEEDS TO BE | | | INDICATED AND ALL OTHER AREAS OF PAVEMENT NEED TO BE | | | SHADED AND SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED. CALCULATIONS ARE TO | | | BE DONE AND ADD THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS TOGETHER | | | AND SHOW THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE AREA PROVIDED. | | | REMOVE THE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED TREES PER 100 | | | SQUARE FEET, AS THIS IS NO LONGER IN THE LANDSCAPE | | | CODE. | | | | | | STILL NEEDS TO BE REVISED. | | | | | | IF OTHER VUA IS 124,093 SQ FT, DIVIDED BY 100 TIMES 4 | | | EQUALS 4964 SQ FT | | | 380 PARKING SPACES TIMES 10 SQ FT EQUALS 3800 SQ FT | | | TOTAL IS 8764 REQUIRED, 22,555 PROVIDED | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. THE TREE DISPOSITION CHART IS TO BE | | | CORRECTED TO SHOW COCONUT PALMS AS CATEGORY 3 WITH 100 | | | SQ FT CANOPY MITIGATION DUE. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(B), BUFFER LENGTHS | | | REQUIRE ONE TREE PER 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR | | | EACH BUFFER LENGTH AND A CONTINUOUS HEDGE. PROVIDE THE | | | REQUIRED AND PROVIDED BUFFER TREES IN A CHART WITH THE | | | INDIVIDUAL BUFFER SECTIONS IDENTIFIED AND THE BUFFER | | | LENGTH EQUAL TO THE SURVEY LENGTH. | | | 8/16/21 REPEAT COMMENT -PROVIDE THE REQUIRED AND | | | PROVIDED BUFFER TREES IN A CHART WITH THE INDIVIDUAL | | | BUFFER SECTIONS IDENTIFIED AND THE BUFFER LENGTH EQUAL | | | TO THE SURVEY LENGTH. | | | | | | STILL NEEDS TO BE REVISED. | | | | | | | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. BUFFERS NEED TO BE CONVERTED TO LANDSCAPE | | | AREA FOR REQUIRED TREES AND HEDGES ON THE EAST AND WEST | | | SIDES OF THE PROPERTY. THE CRAPE MYRTLE TREES ALONG | | | SOUTHERN BOULEVARD WERE PLANTED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER | | | AND ARE PART OF THE LANDSCAPING FOR THE SITE. THE NORTH | | | 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER SHOULD BE CREATED INSIDE THE | | | PROPERTY LINE AND MEET THE REQUIREMENTS. THE RIGHT OF | | | WAY PLANTINGS WILL BE ACCEPTED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS | | | OF SECTION 94-452 ROADWAY BEAUTIFICATION. | | | | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (E)1., PROVIDE THE | | | FOUNDATION PLANTING CALCULATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED | | | FOR THE ENTIRE BUILDING. | | | | | | MEASUREMENT AND PERCENTAGE WERE ONLY PROVIDED FOR THE | | | FA?ADE. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR THE | | | BUILDING PERIMETER. | | | | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF | | | SUBSTITUTION OF PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES. SECTION | | | 94-442(D) REQUIRES A 3:1 RATIO FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR | | | PALMS EXCEPT THE LISTED 1:1 SPECIES. | | | PROVIDE THE PERCENTAGE OF PALMS SUBSTITUTED FOR THE 128 | | | REQUIRED SHADE AND FLOWERING TREES. | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. RECALCULATE THE SECTION IN THE LANDSCAPE | | | DATA CHART TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT | | | SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL | | | ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT | | | SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF | | | SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA | | | WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA | | | LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND | | | DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST. | | | PERCENTAGE IS BASED ON TOTAL PLANTS, NOT SPECIES. | | | REVISE PERCENTAGES. | | | | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING | | | ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND REDESIGN THE LOCATIONS OF THE | | | LIGHTING ON SHORTER POLES TO RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH | | | TREES IN THE PARKING AREA LANDSCAPE ISLANDS. | | | STAFF COULD LOCATE ONLY ONE LIGHT POLE ON THE PLAN. | | | LOCATIONS HAVE BEEN SHOWN, BUT AFTER THE REQUIRED SHADE | | | TREES ARE ADDED IN THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS, ALL CONFLICTS | | | MUST BE RESOLVED, WHICH MAY INVOLVE ADJUSTING LOCATIONS | | | OF THE LIGHT POLES. | | | | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, THERE ARE MULTIPLE CONFLICTS WITH | | | TREES PER THE CIVIL DRAWINGS. | | | | | | 14. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED | | | VALVES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | ALL DUMPSTERS AND TRASH COMPACTORS ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE | | | A HEDGE AROUND THE NON-ACCESS SIDES OF THE ENCLOSURES. | | | ADD THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING TO ALL EXISTING AND | | | PROPOSED ENCLOSURES. | | | | | | 15. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH | | | LANDSCAPING. | | | ONLY 2 TRANSFORMER LOCATIONS ARE INDICATED. EXPLAIN IF | | | THERE ARE NOT MORE. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/16/21: | | | | | | 16. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN IN A 1:20 | | | SCALE FOR CLARITY. | | | | | | | | | 17. SATISFIED. SUPPLY CROSS SECTION DRAWINGS OF THE | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFERS TO DEMONSTRATE HOW THE ELEVATION | | | CHANGES AND ENGINEERING WILL BE PROPOSED TO ACHIEVE THE | | | REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER AREA. | | | CROSS SECTIONS NEED TO BE SHOWN THAT REPRESENT ALL | | | DIFFERENT CONDITIONS. IF THE WIDTH OF THE LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFER AREA OR SLOPE VARIES, A CROSS SECTION MUST BE | | | SHOWN FOR EACH TYPICAL CONDITION. | | | | | | 18. SATISFIED. SEA GRAPE TREES ARE PROPOSED TO BE | | | REMOVED. AN ARBORIST REPORT MUST BE SUPPLIED SHOWING | | | WHY THE NATIVE TREES CANNOT BE PRESERVED OR | | | TRANSPLANTED PER SECTION 94-448(D)(3). | | | APPLICANT HAS INDICATED THIS WILL BE SUPPLIED WITH A | | | LATER SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 19. SATISFIED. THE BANK IS INDICATED AS NOT BEING A | | | SEPARATE PARCEL SO IT MUST BE COUNTED IN THE OVERALL | | | LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS AND THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE | | | PROVIDED. | | | | | | 20. SATISFIED. BUFFER CHART INDICATES ALL LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFERS ARE 7 FEET WIDE. THIS NEEDS TO BE SHOWN ON THE | | | PLAN FOR THE WIDTHS OF ALL BUFFERS, AS SOME DO NOT MEET | | | THE 5 FOOT MINIMUM. | | | | | | DIMENSIONS MUST BE PROVIDED ON THE SITE PLAN AND | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 2/3/22: | | | | | | 21. SATISFIED. EXFILTRATION TRENCH SOUTHWEST OF THE | | | BANK BUILDING CONFLICTS WITH THE LANDSCAPE AREA AND | | | TREES. MOVE INTO THE PAVED AREA AWAY FROM THE LANDSCAPE | | | AREA. | | | | | | 22. SATISFIED. SHOW CALCULATIONS BY LINEAR FEET AND | | | PERCENTAGE FOR THE ADA ACCESS AND DRIVEWAY OPENINGS | | | THAT INTERRUPT THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER FOR EACH SIDE OF | | | THE PROPERTY. PER SECTION 94-443(B)(2) CANNOT EXCEED | | | 25% OF THE REQUIRED LENGTH. | | | | | | 23. SATISFIED. IDENTIFY EXISTING TREES, PALMS AND | | | SHRUBS TO REMAIN AS PART OF THE PLAN APPROVED WITH THIS | | | PETITION. | | | | | | 24. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE LANDSCAPE | | | AREAS AND THE PROPOSED GRAVEL AREAS TO SHOW THE MINIMUM | | | 15% LANDSCAPE AREA IS MET. | | | | | | REQUIRED 15% OF THE SITE IS 57,020 SQ FT. 40,334 IS | | | PROVIDED OR 10.6% IS PROVIDED. THIS IS INCREASED FROM | | | 34,692 OR 9.1% PROVIDING A REDUCTION IN THE | | | NONCONFORMITY. | | | | | | 25. SATISFIED. DIMENSION THE LANDSCAPE WIDTH IN THE | | | INTERIOR ISLANDS THAT HAVE CART CORRALS. THEY DO NOT | | | APPEAR TO MEET THE MINIMUM 8 FEET OF WIDTH. | | | | | | REMAINING COMMENTS CONSOLIDATED 5/19/22: | | | | | | 26. SATISFIED. ON SHEET L-1.00, REVISE THE TREE CANOPY | | | MITIGATION DUE FOR TREES #56, #57, AND #12 TO 300 SQ FT | | | EACH FOR CATEGORY 1 TREES. REVISE THE TOTAL CANOPY | | | MITIGATION DUE TO 5245 SQ FT. AND SHOW TOTAL AT THE | | | BOTTOM OF THE COLUMN. REVISE THE CANOPY MITIGATION | | | PROVIDED TO SHOW THE CANOPY MITIGATION CREDITS FOR ALL | | | NEW TREES ADDED ON THE PLANT LIST AND PROVIDE THE | | | TOTAL. | | | | | | 27. SATISFIED. IN THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING, RELOCATE | | | THE MOBILITY STATION CONCRETE PAD 8 FEET TO THE WEST TO | | | PROVIDE THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREA ADJACENT TO THE | | | PARKING SPACE. | | | | | | 28. SATISFIED. HEDGE NEEDS TO BE EXTENDED ALONG THE | | | SIDE OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE LOCATED AT THE SOUTH | | | SIDE OF THE SITE. CURB MAY NEED TO BE MODIFIED TO ALLOW | | | PLANTING OF THE REQUIRED HEDGE. | | | | | | 29. SATISFIED. QUALIFYING TERMINAL ISLAND TREE IS | | | MISSING FROM THE LANDSCAPE AREA WITH THE FLAGPOLE. | | | SMALL TREE OR PALM NEEDS TO BE INCLUDED THAT WILL NOT | | | CONFLICT WITH THE POLE. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-19-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
05-19-2022 |
Time |
16:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
05-19-2022 |
Time |
16:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-05-19 16:40:55 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: SOUTHDALE PLAZA PUBLIX Z21040002 | | | MAY 13, 2022 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-441(C)(2), THE VALUE OF | | | THE PERMIT WILL EXCEED 50% OF THE VALUE OF THE | | | STRUCTURE, SO THE SITE MUST BE BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE CURRENT LANDSCAPE CODE REQUIREMENTS. | | | THE APPLICANT WAS GIVEN THE LANDSCAPE CODE REQUIREMENTS | | | AT A PRE APPLICATION MEETING, AND THE EXISTING SITE | | | CONDITIONS WERE REVIEWED. IT IS POSSIBLE TO MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SITE AND STAFF IS AVAILABLE TO | | | REVIEW ANY POSSIBILITIES. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. REQUIRED OPEN SPACE FOR THIS ZONING | | | CATEGORY TO CALCULATE REQUIRED TREES, FLOWERING TREES | | | AND SHRUBS PER SECTION 94-442(C)(2)B. AND (3) IS 40% OF | | | THE ENTIRE SITE. REFLECT THIS SQUARE FOOTAGE ON THE | | | SITE DATA AND LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS. | | | 8/16/21 TOTAL SITE AREA IS 380,133 SQ FT. 40% IS | | | 152,053.2 SQ FT. THESE FIGURES ARE TO BE SHOWN ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS. REQUIRED TREES (102), FLOWERING | | | TREES (26) AND SHRUBS (305) ARE CALCULATED ON 152,053.2 | | | SQ FT. CORRECT ALL ITEMS ON CHART. | | | | | | FIGURES NEED TO BE CORRECTED TO REFLECT THE ABOVE | | | CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443 (C)(3)A. REQUIRES A | | | TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND AND REQUIRED TREE FOR EACH | | | ROW OF PARKING. (3)B. REQUIRES AN INTERIOR LANDSCAPE | | | ISLAND WITH A REQUIRED TREE SO THERE ARE NO MORE THAN | | | 10 SPACES IN A ROW. ALL THESE LANDSCAPE AREAS MUST MEET | | | THE MINIMUM WIDTH OF 8 FEET OF LANDSCAPE AREA AND BE | | | THE FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT SPACE. (3) C. REQUIRES | | | DIVIDER MEDIANS WHERE THERE ARE MORE THAN 3 CONSECUTIVE | | | ROWS OF PARKING. ALL AREAS OF PARKING MUST MEET THESE | | | REQUIREMENTS. | | | THERE ARE ISLANDS THAT DO NOT RUN THE LENGTH OF THE | | | PARKING SPACE, AND THAT ARE MINIMIZED BY HAVING | | | SIDEWALKS THROUGH THEM. THE INTENT OF THE CODE IS TO | | | PROVIDE SHADE FOR AS MANY PARKING SPACES AS POSSIBLE | | | AND MINIMIZE THE HEAT ISLAND EFFECT CREATED BY THE | | | ASPHALT. ONLY ONE PARTIAL DIVIDER MEDIAN IS PROVIDED | | | THAT IS ONLY ADJACENT TO 5 PARKING SPACES. | | | | | | THE LENGTH OF THE ISLANDS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED PER | | | DISCUSSIONS WITH THE ENGINEER. CONFIGURATION OF ADA | | | WALKWAYS NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED TO ELIMINATE UNNECESSARY | | | PAVED AREAS REDUCING THE PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A | | | MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO | | | BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING | | | AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE | | | PERCENTAGE OF CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR THE | | | REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS AS REQUIRED BY SECTION | | | 94-443(C)(3) FOR DIVIDER ISLANDS, TERMINAL, AND | | | INTERIOR ISLANDS. THE ONLY TREE SPECIES LISTED ON THE | | | PLANT LIST THAT ARE CATEGORY 1 ARE THE LIVE OAK TREES. | | | | | | 79 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS REQUIRE 60 BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE | | | TREES. LIVE OAK AND GUMBO LIMBO QUALIFY. ONLY 42 ARE | | | PROVIDED, SO STAFF SUGGESTS RELOCATING OR REMOVING | | | EXISTING PALMS AND REPLACING WITH 18 SHADE TREES. | | | | | | THERE ARE NOW 82 LANDSCAPE INTERIOR AND TERMINAL | | | ISLANDS SHOWN. 62 CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES ARE REQUIRED. | | | COCONUT PALMS NEED TO BE REPLACED WITH SHADE TREES. | | | GREEN BUTTONWOOD IS A CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREE. | | | | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING | | | LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION | | | 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS. PROVIDE | | | THE TOTAL REQUIRED AND PROVIDED AS ONE TOTAL FOR BOTH | | | SECTIONS. A SEPARATE EXHIBIT PLAN MUST BE PROVIDED TO | | | SHOW THE AREAS COUNTED FOLLOWING THE DESCRIPTION OF | | | AREAS AS SHOWN IN FIGURE XIV-1. | | | AN EXHIBIT WAS PROVIDED ON SHEET L1.01 BUT IS | | | INCOMPLETE. THE AREA OF PARKING SPACES NEEDS TO BE | | | INDICATED AND ALL OTHER AREAS OF PAVEMENT NEED TO BE | | | SHADED AND SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED. CALCULATIONS ARE TO | | | BE DONE AND ADD THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS TOGETHER | | | AND SHOW THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE AREA PROVIDED. | | | REMOVE THE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED TREES PER 100 | | | SQUARE FEET, AS THIS IS NO LONGER IN THE LANDSCAPE | | | CODE. | | | | | | STILL NEEDS TO BE REVISED. | | | | | | IF OTHER VUA IS 124,093 SQ FT, DIVIDED BY 100 TIMES 4 | | | EQUALS 4964 SQ FT | | | 380 PARKING SPACES TIMES 10 SQ FT EQUALS 3800 SQ FT | | | TOTAL IS 8764 REQUIRED, 22,555 PROVIDED | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. THE TREE DISPOSITION CHART IS TO BE | | | CORRECTED TO SHOW COCONUT PALMS AS CATEGORY 3 WITH 100 | | | SQ FT CANOPY MITIGATION DUE. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(B), BUFFER LENGTHS | | | REQUIRE ONE TREE PER 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR | | | EACH BUFFER LENGTH AND A CONTINUOUS HEDGE. PROVIDE THE | | | REQUIRED AND PROVIDED BUFFER TREES IN A CHART WITH THE | | | INDIVIDUAL BUFFER SECTIONS IDENTIFIED AND THE BUFFER | | | LENGTH EQUAL TO THE SURVEY LENGTH. | | | 8/16/21 REPEAT COMMENT -PROVIDE THE REQUIRED AND | | | PROVIDED BUFFER TREES IN A CHART WITH THE INDIVIDUAL | | | BUFFER SECTIONS IDENTIFIED AND THE BUFFER LENGTH EQUAL | | | TO THE SURVEY LENGTH. | | | | | | STILL NEEDS TO BE REVISED. | | | | | | | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. BUFFERS NEED TO BE CONVERTED TO LANDSCAPE | | | AREA FOR REQUIRED TREES AND HEDGES ON THE EAST AND WEST | | | SIDES OF THE PROPERTY. THE CRAPE MYRTLE TREES ALONG | | | SOUTHERN BOULEVARD WERE PLANTED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER | | | AND ARE PART OF THE LANDSCAPING FOR THE SITE. THE NORTH | | | 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER SHOULD BE CREATED INSIDE THE | | | PROPERTY LINE AND MEET THE REQUIREMENTS. THE RIGHT OF | | | WAY PLANTINGS WILL BE ACCEPTED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS | | | OF SECTION 94-452 ROADWAY BEAUTIFICATION. | | | | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (E)1., PROVIDE THE | | | FOUNDATION PLANTING CALCULATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED | | | FOR THE ENTIRE BUILDING. | | | | | | MEASUREMENT AND PERCENTAGE WERE ONLY PROVIDED FOR THE | | | FA?ADE. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR THE | | | BUILDING PERIMETER. | | | | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF | | | SUBSTITUTION OF PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES. SECTION | | | 94-442(D) REQUIRES A 3:1 RATIO FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR | | | PALMS EXCEPT THE LISTED 1:1 SPECIES. | | | PROVIDE THE PERCENTAGE OF PALMS SUBSTITUTED FOR THE 128 | | | REQUIRED SHADE AND FLOWERING TREES. | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. RECALCULATE THE SECTION IN THE LANDSCAPE | | | DATA CHART TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT | | | SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL | | | ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT | | | SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF | | | SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA | | | WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA | | | LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND | | | DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST. | | | PERCENTAGE IS BASED ON TOTAL PLANTS, NOT SPECIES. | | | REVISE PERCENTAGES. | | | | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING | | | ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND REDESIGN THE LOCATIONS OF THE | | | LIGHTING ON SHORTER POLES TO RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH | | | TREES IN THE PARKING AREA LANDSCAPE ISLANDS. | | | STAFF COULD LOCATE ONLY ONE LIGHT POLE ON THE PLAN. | | | LOCATIONS HAVE BEEN SHOWN, BUT AFTER THE REQUIRED SHADE | | | TREES ARE ADDED IN THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS, ALL CONFLICTS | | | MUST BE RESOLVED, WHICH MAY INVOLVE ADJUSTING LOCATIONS | | | OF THE LIGHT POLES. | | | | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, THERE ARE MULTIPLE CONFLICTS WITH | | | TREES PER THE CIVIL DRAWINGS. | | | | | | 14. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED | | | VALVES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | ALL DUMPSTERS AND TRASH COMPACTORS ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE | | | A HEDGE AROUND THE NON-ACCESS SIDES OF THE ENCLOSURES. | | | ADD THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING TO ALL EXISTING AND | | | PROPOSED ENCLOSURES. | | | | | | 15. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH | | | LANDSCAPING. | | | ONLY 2 TRANSFORMER LOCATIONS ARE INDICATED. EXPLAIN IF | | | THERE ARE NOT MORE. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/16/21: | | | | | | 16. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN IN A 1:20 | | | SCALE FOR CLARITY. | | | | | | | | | 17. SATISFIED. SUPPLY CROSS SECTION DRAWINGS OF THE | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFERS TO DEMONSTRATE HOW THE ELEVATION | | | CHANGES AND ENGINEERING WILL BE PROPOSED TO ACHIEVE THE | | | REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER AREA. | | | CROSS SECTIONS NEED TO BE SHOWN THAT REPRESENT ALL | | | DIFFERENT CONDITIONS. IF THE WIDTH OF THE LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFER AREA OR SLOPE VARIES, A CROSS SECTION MUST BE | | | SHOWN FOR EACH TYPICAL CONDITION. | | | | | | 18. SATISFIED. SEA GRAPE TREES ARE PROPOSED TO BE | | | REMOVED. AN ARBORIST REPORT MUST BE SUPPLIED SHOWING | | | WHY THE NATIVE TREES CANNOT BE PRESERVED OR | | | TRANSPLANTED PER SECTION 94-448(D)(3). | | | APPLICANT HAS INDICATED THIS WILL BE SUPPLIED WITH A | | | LATER SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 19. SATISFIED. THE BANK IS INDICATED AS NOT BEING A | | | SEPARATE PARCEL SO IT MUST BE COUNTED IN THE OVERALL | | | LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS AND THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE | | | PROVIDED. | | | | | | 20. SATISFIED. BUFFER CHART INDICATES ALL LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFERS ARE 7 FEET WIDE. THIS NEEDS TO BE SHOWN ON THE | | | PLAN FOR THE WIDTHS OF ALL BUFFERS, AS SOME DO NOT MEET | | | THE 5 FOOT MINIMUM. | | | | | | DIMENSIONS MUST BE PROVIDED ON THE SITE PLAN AND | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 2/3/22: | | | | | | 21. SATISFIED. EXFILTRATION TRENCH SOUTHWEST OF THE | | | BANK BUILDING CONFLICTS WITH THE LANDSCAPE AREA AND | | | TREES. MOVE INTO THE PAVED AREA AWAY FROM THE LANDSCAPE | | | AREA. | | | | | | 22. SATISFIED. SHOW CALCULATIONS BY LINEAR FEET AND | | | PERCENTAGE FOR THE ADA ACCESS AND DRIVEWAY OPENINGS | | | THAT INTERRUPT THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER FOR EACH SIDE OF | | | THE PROPERTY. PER SECTION 94-443(B)(2) CANNOT EXCEED | | | 25% OF THE REQUIRED LENGTH. | | | | | | 23. SATISFIED. IDENTIFY EXISTING TREES, PALMS AND | | | SHRUBS TO REMAIN AS PART OF THE PLAN APPROVED WITH THIS | | | PETITION. | | | | | | 24. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE LANDSCAPE | | | AREAS AND THE PROPOSED GRAVEL AREAS TO SHOW THE MINIMUM | | | 15% LANDSCAPE AREA IS MET. | | | | | | REQUIRED 15% OF THE SITE IS 57,020 SQ FT. 40,334 IS | | | PROVIDED OR 10.6% IS PROVIDED. THIS IS INCREASED FROM | | | 34,692 OR 9.1% PROVIDING A REDUCTION IN THE | | | NONCONFORMITY. | | | | | | 25. SATISFIED. DIMENSION THE LANDSCAPE WIDTH IN THE | | | INTERIOR ISLANDS THAT HAVE CART CORRALS. THEY DO NOT | | | APPEAR TO MEET THE MINIMUM 8 FEET OF WIDTH. | | | | | | REMAINING COMMENTS CONSOLIDATED 5/19/22: | | | | | | 26. ON SHEET L-1.00, REVISE THE TREE CANOPY MITIGATION | | | DUE FOR TREES #56, #57, AND #12 TO 300 SQ FT EACH FOR | | | CATEGORY 1 TREES. REVISE THE TOTAL CANOPY MITIGATION | | | DUE TO 5245 SQ FT. AND SHOW TOTAL AT THE BOTTOM OF THE | | | COLUMN. REVISE THE CANOPY MITIGATION PROVIDED TO SHOW | | | THE CANOPY MITIGATION CREDITS FOR ALL NEW TREES ADDED | | | ON THE PLANT LIST AND PROVIDE THE TOTAL. | | | | | | 27. IN THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING, RELOCATE THE MOBILITY | | | STATION CONCRETE PAD 8 FEET TO THE WEST TO PROVIDE THE | | | REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREA ADJACENT TO THE PARKING SPACE. | | | | | | 28. HEDGE NEEDS TO BE EXTENDED ALONG THE SIDE OF THE | | | DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE LOCATED AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE | | | SITE. CURB MAY NEED TO BE MODIFIED TO ALLOW PLANTING OF | | | THE REQUIRED HEDGE. | | | | | | 29. QUALIFYING TERMINAL ISLAND TREE IS MISSING FROM THE | | | LANDSCAPE AREA WITH THE FLAGPOLE. SMALL TREE OR PALM | | | NEEDS TO BE INCLUDED THAT WILL NOT CONFLICT WITH THE | | | POLE. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-04-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
02-04-2022 |
Time |
10:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
02-04-2022 |
Time |
10:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-02-04 10:00:38 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: SOUTHDALE PLAZA PUBLIX Z21040002 | | | FEBRUARY 3, 2022 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-441(C)(2), THE | | | VALUE OF THE PERMIT WILL EXCEED 50% OF THE VALUE OF THE | | | STRUCTURE, SO THE SITE MUST BE BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE CURRENT LANDSCAPE CODE REQUIREMENTS. | | | THE APPLICANT WAS GIVEN THE LANDSCAPE CODE REQUIREMENTS | | | AT A PRE APPLICATION MEETING, AND THE EXISTING SITE | | | CONDITIONS WERE REVIEWED. IT IS POSSIBLE TO MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SITE AND STAFF IS AVAILABLE TO | | | REVIEW ANY POSSIBILITIES. | | | | | | 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. REQUIRED OPEN SPACE FOR THIS | | | ZONING CATEGORY TO CALCULATE REQUIRED TREES, FLOWERING | | | TREES AND SHRUBS PER SECTION 94-442(C)(2)B. AND (3) IS | | | 40% OF THE ENTIRE SITE. REFLECT THIS SQUARE FOOTAGE ON | | | THE SITE DATA AND LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS. | | | 8/16/21 TOTAL SITE AREA IS 380,133 SQ FT. 40% IS | | | 152,053.2 SQ FT. THESE FIGURES ARE TO BE SHOWN ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS. REQUIRED TREES (102), FLOWERING | | | TREES (26) AND SHRUBS (305) ARE CALCULATED ON 152,053.2 | | | SQ FT. CORRECT ALL ITEMS ON CHART. | | | | | | FIGURES NEED TO BE CORRECTED TO REFLECT THE ABOVE | | | CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | | | | 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443 (C)(3)A. | | | REQUIRES A TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND AND REQUIRED TREE | | | FOR EACH ROW OF PARKING. (3)B. REQUIRES AN INTERIOR | | | LANDSCAPE ISLAND WITH A REQUIRED TREE SO THERE ARE NO | | | MORE THAN 10 SPACES IN A ROW. ALL THESE LANDSCAPE AREAS | | | MUST MEET THE MINIMUM WIDTH OF 8 FEET OF LANDSCAPE AREA | | | AND BE THE FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT SPACE. (3) C. | | | REQUIRES DIVIDER MEDIANS WHERE THERE ARE MORE THAN 3 | | | CONSECUTIVE ROWS OF PARKING. ALL AREAS OF PARKING MUST | | | MEET THESE REQUIREMENTS. | | | THERE ARE ISLANDS THAT DO NOT RUN THE LENGTH OF THE | | | PARKING SPACE, AND THAT ARE MINIMIZED BY HAVING | | | SIDEWALKS THROUGH THEM. THE INTENT OF THE CODE IS TO | | | PROVIDE SHADE FOR AS MANY PARKING SPACES AS POSSIBLE | | | AND MINIMIZE THE HEAT ISLAND EFFECT CREATED BY THE | | | ASPHALT. ONLY ONE PARTIAL DIVIDER MEDIAN IS PROVIDED | | | THAT IS ONLY ADJACENT TO 5 PARKING SPACES. | | | | | | THE LENGTH OF THE ISLANDS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED PER | | | DISCUSSIONS WITH THE ENGINEER. CONFIGURATION OF ADA | | | WALKWAYS NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED TO ELIMINATE UNNECESSARY | | | PAVED AREAS REDUCING THE PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA. | | | | | | 4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES | | | THAT A MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE | | | REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF | | | STREET PARKING AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. | | | SHOW THE PERCENTAGE OF CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR | | | THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS AS REQUIRED BY SECTION | | | 94-443(C)(3) FOR DIVIDER ISLANDS, TERMINAL, AND | | | INTERIOR ISLANDS. THE ONLY TREE SPECIES LISTED ON THE | | | PLANT LIST THAT ARE CATEGORY 1 ARE THE LIVE OAK TREES. | | | | | | 79 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS REQUIRE 60 BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE | | | TREES. LIVE OAK AND GUMBO LIMBO QUALIFY. ONLY 42 ARE | | | PROVIDED, SO STAFF SUGGESTS RELOCATING OR REMOVING | | | EXISTING PALMS AND REPLACING WITH 18 SHADE TREES. | | | | | | THERE ARE NOW 82 LANDSCAPE INTERIOR AND TERMINAL | | | ISLANDS SHOWN. 62 CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES ARE REQUIRED. | | | COCONUT PALMS NEED TO BE REPLACED WITH SHADE TREES. | | | GREEN BUTTONWOOD IS A CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREE. | | | | | | | | | 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE | | | PARKING LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH | | | SECTION 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS. | | | PROVIDE THE TOTAL REQUIRED AND PROVIDED AS ONE TOTAL | | | FOR BOTH SECTIONS. A SEPARATE EXHIBIT PLAN MUST BE | | | PROVIDED TO SHOW THE AREAS COUNTED FOLLOWING THE | | | DESCRIPTION OF AREAS AS SHOWN IN FIGURE XIV-1. | | | AN EXHIBIT WAS PROVIDED ON SHEET L1.01 BUT IS | | | INCOMPLETE. THE AREA OF PARKING SPACES NEEDS TO BE | | | INDICATED AND ALL OTHER AREAS OF PAVEMENT NEED TO BE | | | SHADED AND SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED. CALCULATIONS ARE TO | | | BE DONE AND ADD THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS TOGETHER | | | AND SHOW THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE AREA PROVIDED. | | | REMOVE THE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED TREES PER 100 | | | SQUARE FEET, AS THIS IS NO LONGER IN THE LANDSCAPE | | | CODE. | | | | | | STILL NEEDS TO BE REVISED. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. THE TREE DISPOSITION CHART IS TO BE | | | CORRECTED TO SHOW COCONUT PALMS AS CATEGORY 3 WITH 100 | | | SQ FT CANOPY MITIGATION DUE. | | | | | | 7. NOT SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(B), BUFFER LENGTHS | | | REQUIRE ONE TREE PER 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR | | | EACH BUFFER LENGTH AND A CONTINUOUS HEDGE. PROVIDE THE | | | REQUIRED AND PROVIDED BUFFER TREES IN A CHART WITH THE | | | INDIVIDUAL BUFFER SECTIONS IDENTIFIED AND THE BUFFER | | | LENGTH EQUAL TO THE SURVEY LENGTH. | | | 8/16/21 REPEAT COMMENT -PROVIDE THE REQUIRED AND | | | PROVIDED BUFFER TREES IN A CHART WITH THE INDIVIDUAL | | | BUFFER SECTIONS IDENTIFIED AND THE BUFFER LENGTH EQUAL | | | TO THE SURVEY LENGTH. | | | | | | STILL NEEDS TO BE REVISED. | | | | | | | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. BUFFERS NEED TO BE CONVERTED TO LANDSCAPE | | | AREA FOR REQUIRED TREES AND HEDGES ON THE EAST AND WEST | | | SIDES OF THE PROPERTY. THE CRAPE MYRTLE TREES ALONG | | | SOUTHERN BOULEVARD WERE PLANTED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER | | | AND ARE PART OF THE LANDSCAPING FOR THE SITE. THE NORTH | | | 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER SHOULD BE CREATED INSIDE THE | | | PROPERTY LINE AND MEET THE REQUIREMENTS. THE RIGHT OF | | | WAY PLANTINGS WILL BE ACCEPTED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS | | | OF SECTION 94-452 ROADWAY BEAUTIFICATION. | | | | | | | | | 9. NOT SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (E)1., PROVIDE THE | | | FOUNDATION PLANTING CALCULATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED | | | FOR THE ENTIRE BUILDING. | | | | | | MEASUREMENT AND PERCENTAGE WERE ONLY PROVIDED FOR THE | | | FA?ADE. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR THE | | | BUILDING PERIMETER. | | | | | | | | | 10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER AND | | | PERCENTAGE OF SUBSTITUTION OF PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES. | | | SECTION 94-442(D) REQUIRES A 3:1 RATIO FOR SUBSTITUTION | | | FOR PALMS EXCEPT THE LISTED 1:1 SPECIES. | | | PROVIDE THE PERCENTAGE OF PALMS SUBSTITUTED FOR THE 128 | | | REQUIRED SHADE AND FLOWERING TREES. | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. RECALCULATE THE SECTION IN THE LANDSCAPE | | | DATA CHART TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT | | | SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL | | | ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT | | | SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF | | | SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA | | | WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA | | | LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND | | | DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST. | | | PERCENTAGE IS BASED ON TOTAL PLANTS, NOT SPECIES. | | | REVISE PERCENTAGES. | | | | | | | | | 12. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE | | | LIGHTING ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND REDESIGN THE | | | LOCATIONS OF THE LIGHTING ON SHORTER POLES TO RESOLVE | | | ANY CONFLICTS WITH TREES IN THE PARKING AREA LANDSCAPE | | | ISLANDS. | | | STAFF COULD LOCATE ONLY ONE LIGHT POLE ON THE PLAN. | | | LOCATIONS HAVE BEEN SHOWN, BUT AFTER THE REQUIRED SHADE | | | TREES ARE ADDED IN THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS, ALL CONFLICTS | | | MUST BE RESOLVED, WHICH MAY INVOLVE ADJUSTING LOCATIONS | | | OF THE LIGHT POLES. | | | | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, THERE ARE MULTIPLE CONFLICTS WITH | | | TREES PER THE CIVIL DRAWINGS. | | | | | | 14. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED | | | VALVES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | ALL DUMPSTERS AND TRASH COMPACTORS ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE | | | A HEDGE AROUND THE NON-ACCESS SIDES OF THE ENCLOSURES. | | | ADD THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING TO ALL EXISTING AND | | | PROPOSED ENCLOSURES. | | | | | | 15. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH | | | LANDSCAPING. | | | ONLY 2 TRANSFORMER LOCATIONS ARE INDICATED. EXPLAIN IF | | | THERE ARE NOT MORE. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/16/21: | | | | | | 16. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN IN A 1:20 | | | SCALE FOR CLARITY. | | | | | | | | | 17. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SUPPLY CROSS SECTION DRAWINGS | | | OF THE LANDSCAPE BUFFERS TO DEMONSTRATE HOW THE | | | ELEVATION CHANGES AND ENGINEERING WILL BE PROPOSED TO | | | ACHIEVE THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER AREA. | | | CROSS SECTIONS NEED TO BE SHOWN THAT REPRESENT ALL | | | DIFFERENT CONDITIONS. IF THE WIDTH OF THE LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFER AREA OR SLOPE VARIES, A CROSS SECTION MUST BE | | | SHOWN FOR EACH TYPICAL CONDITION. | | | | | | 18. NOT SATISFIED. SEA GRAPE TREES ARE PROPOSED TO BE | | | REMOVED. AN ARBORIST REPORT MUST BE SUPPLIED SHOWING | | | WHY THE NATIVE TREES CANNOT BE PRESERVED OR | | | TRANSPLANTED PER SECTION 94-448(D)(3). | | | APPLICANT HAS INDICATED THIS WILL BE SUPPLIED WITH A | | | LATER SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 19. SATISFIED. THE BANK IS INDICATED AS NOT BEING A | | | SEPARATE PARCEL SO IT MUST BE COUNTED IN THE OVERALL | | | LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS AND THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE | | | PROVIDED. | | | | | | 20. NOT SATISFIED. BUFFER CHART INDICATES ALL LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFERS ARE 7 FEET WIDE. THIS NEEDS TO BE SHOWN ON THE | | | PLAN FOR THE WIDTHS OF ALL BUFFERS, AS SOME DO NOT MEET | | | THE 5 FOOT MINIMUM. | | | | | | DIMENSIONS MUST BE PROVIDED ON THE SITE PLAN AND | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 2/3/22: | | | | | | | | | 21. EXFILTRATION TRENCH SOUTHWEST OF THE BANK BUILDING | | | CONFLICTS WITH THE LANDSCAPE AREA AND TREES. MOVE INTO | | | THE PAVED AREA AWAY FROM THE LANDSCAPE AREA. | | | | | | 22. SHOW CALCULATIONS BY LINEAR FEET AND PERCENTAGE FOR | | | THE ADA ACCESS AND DRIVEWAY OPENINGS THAT INTERRUPT THE | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFER FOR EACH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. PER | | | SECTION 94-443(B)(2) CANNOT EXCEED 25% OF THE REQUIRED | | | LENGTH. | | | | | | 23. IDENTIFY EXISTING TREES, PALMS AND SHRUBS TO REMAIN | | | AS PART OF THE PLAN APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | | | | 24. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE LANDSCAPE AREAS AND | | | THE PROPOSED GRAVEL AREAS TO SHOW THE MINIMUM 15% | | | LANDSCAPE AREA IS MET. | | | | | | 25. DIMENSION THE LANDSCAPE WIDTH IN THE INTERIOR | | | ISLANDS THAT HAVE CART CORRALS. THEY DO NOT APPEAR TO | | | MEET THE MINIMUM 8 FEET OF WIDTH. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-16-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
08-16-2021 |
Time |
16:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
08-16-2021 |
Time |
16:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-08-16 16:46:20 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: SOUTHDALE PLAZA PUBLIX Z21040002 | | | AUGUST 16, 2021 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-441(C)(2), THE | | | VALUE OF THE PERMIT WILL EXCEED 50% OF THE VALUE OF THE | | | STRUCTURE, SO THE SITE MUST BE BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE CURRENT LANDSCAPE CODE REQUIREMENTS. | | | THE APPLICANT WAS GIVEN THE LANDSCAPE CODE REQUIREMENTS | | | AT A PRE APPLICATION MEETING, AND THE EXISTING SITE | | | CONDITIONS WERE REVIEWED. IT IS POSSIBLE TO MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SITE AND STAFF IS AVAILABLE TO | | | REVIEW ANY POSSIBILITIES. | | | | | | 2. NOT SATISFIED. REQUIRED OPEN SPACE FOR THIS ZONING | | | CATEGORY TO CALCULATE REQUIRED TREES, FLOWERING TREES | | | AND SHRUBS PER SECTION 94-442(C)(2)B. AND (3) IS 40% OF | | | THE ENTIRE SITE. REFLECT THIS SQUARE FOOTAGE ON THE | | | SITE DATA AND LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS. | | | 8/16/21 TOTAL SITE AREA IS 380,133 SQ FT. 40% IS | | | 152,053.2 SQ FT. THESE FIGURES ARE TO BE SHOWN ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS. REQUIRED TREES (102), FLOWERING | | | TREES (26) AND SHRUBS (305) ARE CALCULATED ON 152,053.2 | | | SQ FT. CORRECT ALL ITEMS ON CHART. | | | | | | 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443 (C)(3)A. | | | REQUIRES A TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND AND REQUIRED TREE | | | FOR EACH ROW OF PARKING. (3)B. REQUIRES AN INTERIOR | | | LANDSCAPE ISLAND WITH A REQUIRED TREE SO THERE ARE NO | | | MORE THAN 10 SPACES IN A ROW. ALL THESE LANDSCAPE AREAS | | | MUST MEET THE MINIMUM WIDTH OF 8 FEET OF LANDSCAPE AREA | | | AND BE THE FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT SPACE. (3) C. | | | REQUIRES DIVIDER MEDIANS WHERE THERE ARE MORE THAN 3 | | | CONSECUTIVE ROWS OF PARKING. ALL AREAS OF PARKING MUST | | | MEET THESE REQUIREMENTS. | | | THERE ARE ISLANDS THAT DO NOT RUN THE LENGTH OF THE | | | PARKING SPACE, AND THAT ARE MINIMIZED BY HAVING | | | SIDEWALKS THROUGH THEM. THE INTENT OF THE CODE IS TO | | | PROVIDE SHADE FOR AS MANY PARKING SPACES AS POSSIBLE | | | AND MINIMIZE THE HEAT ISLAND EFFECT CREATED BY THE | | | ASPHALT. ONLY ONE PARTIAL DIVIDER MEDIAN IS PROVIDED | | | THAT IS ONLY ADJACENT TO 5 PARKING SPACES. | | | | | | 4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES | | | THAT A MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE | | | REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF | | | STREET PARKING AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. | | | SHOW THE PERCENTAGE OF CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR | | | THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS AS REQUIRED BY SECTION | | | 94-443(C)(3) FOR DIVIDER ISLANDS, TERMINAL, AND | | | INTERIOR ISLANDS. THE ONLY TREE SPECIES LISTED ON THE | | | PLANT LIST THAT ARE CATEGORY 1 ARE THE LIVE OAK TREES. | | | | | | 79 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS REQUIRE 60 BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE | | | TREES. LIVE OAK AND GUMBO LIMBO QUALIFY. ONLY 42 ARE | | | PROVIDED, SO STAFF SUGGESTS RELOCATING OR REMOVING | | | EXISTING PALMS AND REPLACING WITH 18 SHADE TREES. | | | | | | | | | 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE | | | PARKING LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH | | | SECTION 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS. | | | PROVIDE THE TOTAL REQUIRED AND PROVIDED AS ONE TOTAL | | | FOR BOTH SECTIONS. A SEPARATE EXHIBIT PLAN MUST BE | | | PROVIDED TO SHOW THE AREAS COUNTED FOLLOWING THE | | | DESCRIPTION OF AREAS AS SHOWN IN FIGURE XIV-1. | | | AN EXHIBIT WAS PROVIDED ON SHEET L1.01 BUT IS | | | INCOMPLETE. THE AREA OF PARKING SPACES NEEDS TO BE | | | INDICATED AND ALL OTHER AREAS OF PAVEMENT NEED TO BE | | | SHADED AND SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED. CALCULATIONS ARE TO | | | BE DONE AND ADD THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS TOGETHER | | | AND SHOW THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE AREA PROVIDED. | | | REMOVE THE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED TREES PER 100 | | | SQUARE FEET, AS THIS IS NO LONGER IN THE LANDSCAPE | | | CODE. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. THE TREE DISPOSITION CHART IS TO BE | | | CORRECTED TO SHOW COCONUT PALMS AS CATEGORY 3 WITH 100 | | | SQ FT CANOPY MITIGATION DUE. | | | | | | 7. NOT SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(B), BUFFER LENGTHS | | | REQUIRE ONE TREE PER 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR | | | EACH BUFFER LENGTH AND A CONTINUOUS HEDGE. PROVIDE THE | | | REQUIRED AND PROVIDED BUFFER TREES IN A CHART WITH THE | | | INDIVIDUAL BUFFER SECTIONS IDENTIFIED AND THE BUFFER | | | LENGTH EQUAL TO THE SURVEY LENGTH. | | | 8/16/21 REPEAT COMMENT -PROVIDE THE REQUIRED AND | | | PROVIDED BUFFER TREES IN A CHART WITH THE INDIVIDUAL | | | BUFFER SECTIONS IDENTIFIED AND THE BUFFER LENGTH EQUAL | | | TO THE SURVEY LENGTH. | | | | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. BUFFERS NEED TO BE CONVERTED TO LANDSCAPE | | | AREA FOR REQUIRED TREES AND HEDGES ON THE EAST AND WEST | | | SIDES OF THE PROPERTY. THE CRAPE MYRTLE TREES ALONG | | | SOUTHERN BOULEVARD WERE PLANTED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER | | | AND ARE PART OF THE LANDSCAPING FOR THE SITE. THE NORTH | | | 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER SHOULD BE CREATED INSIDE THE | | | PROPERTY LINE AND MEET THE REQUIREMENTS. THE RIGHT OF | | | WAY PLANTINGS WILL BE ACCEPTED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS | | | OF SECTION 94-452 ROADWAY BEAUTIFICATION. | | | | | | | | | 9. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (E)1., | | | PROVIDE THE FOUNDATION PLANTING CALCULATION REQUIRED | | | AND PROVIDED FOR THE ENTIRE BUILDING. | | | | | | MEASUREMENT AND PERCENTAGE WERE ONLY PROVIDED FOR THE | | | FA?ADE. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR THE | | | BUILDING PERIMETER. | | | | | | | | | 10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER AND | | | PERCENTAGE OF SUBSTITUTION OF PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES. | | | SECTION 94-442(D) REQUIRES A 3:1 RATIO FOR SUBSTITUTION | | | FOR PALMS EXCEPT THE LISTED 1:1 SPECIES. | | | PROVIDE THE PERCENTAGE OF PALMS SUBSTITUTED FOR THE 128 | | | REQUIRED SHADE AND FLOWERING TREES. | | | | | | 11. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. RECALCULATE THE SECTION IN THE | | | LANDSCAPE DATA CHART TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. | | | PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT | | | MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF | | | NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS BASED ON FINAL PLANT | | | LIST. | | | PERCENTAGE IS BASED ON TOTAL PLANTS, NOT SPECIES. | | | REVISE PERCENTAGES. | | | | | | | | | 12. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE | | | LIGHTING ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND REDESIGN THE | | | LOCATIONS OF THE LIGHTING ON SHORTER POLES TO RESOLVE | | | ANY CONFLICTS WITH TREES IN THE PARKING AREA LANDSCAPE | | | ISLANDS. | | | STAFF COULD LOCATE ONLY ONE LIGHT POLE ON THE PLAN. | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, THERE ARE MULTIPLE CONFLICTS WITH | | | TREES PER THE CIVIL DRAWINGS. | | | | | | 14. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL | | | GROUND MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | ALL DUMPSTERS AND TRASH COMPACTORS ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE | | | A HEDGE AROUND THE NON-ACCESS SIDES OF THE ENCLOSURES. | | | ADD THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING TO ALL EXISTING AND | | | PROPOSED ENCLOSURES. | | | | | | 15. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL | | | TRANSFORMERS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE | | | CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | ONLY 2 TRANSFORMER LOCATIONS ARE INDICATED. EXPLAIN IF | | | THERE ARE NOT MORE. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/16/21: | | | | | | 16. PROVIDE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN IN A 1:20 SCALE FOR | | | CLARITY. | | | | | | | | | 17. SUPPLY CROSS SECTION DRAWINGS OF THE LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFERS TO DEMONSTRATE HOW THE ELEVATION CHANGES AND | | | ENGINEERING WILL BE PROPOSED TO ACHIEVE THE REQUIRED | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFER AREA. | | | | | | 18. SEA GRAPE TREES ARE PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED. AN | | | ARBORIST REPORT MUST BE SUPPLIED SHOWING WHY THE NATIVE | | | TREES CANNOT BE PRESERVED OR TRANSPLANTED PER SECTION | | | 94-448(D)(3). | | | | | | 19. THE BANK IS INDICATED AS NOT BEING A SEPARATE | | | PARCEL SO IT MUST BE COUNTED IN THE OVERALL LANDSCAPE | | | CALCULATIONS AND THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 20. BUFFER CHART INDICATES ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ARE 7 | | | FEET WIDE. THIS NEEDS TO BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN FOR THE | | | WIDTHS OF ALL BUFFERS, AS SOME DO NOT MEET THE 5 FOOT | | | MINIMUM. | | | 21. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-07-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
05-07-2021 |
Time |
16:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
05-07-2021 |
Time |
16:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-05-07 16:18:58 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: SOUTHDALE PLAZA PUBLIX Z21040002 | | | MAY 7, 2021 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PER SECTION 94-441(C)(2), THE VALUE OF THE PERMIT | | | WILL EXCEED 50% OF THE VALUE OF THE STRUCTURE, SO THE | | | SITE MUST BE BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE CURRENT | | | LANDSCAPE CODE REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 2. REQUIRED OPEN SPACE FOR THIS ZONING CATEGORY TO | | | CALCULATE REQUIRED TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS | | | PER SECTION 94-442(C)(2)B. AND (3) IS 40% OF THE ENTIRE | | | SITE. REFLECT THIS SQUARE FOOTAGE ON THE SITE DATA AND | | | LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 3. SECTION 94-443 (C)(3)A. REQUIRES A TERMINAL | | | LANDSCAPE ISLAND AND REQUIRED TREE FOR EACH ROW OF | | | PARKING. (3)B. REQUIRES AN INTERIOR LANDSCAPE ISLAND | | | WITH A REQUIRED TREE SO THERE ARE NO MORE THAN 10 | | | SPACES IN A ROW. ALL THESE LANDSCAPE AREAS MUST MEET | | | THE MINIMUM WIDTH OF 8 FEET OF LANDSCAPE AREA AND BE | | | THE FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT SPACE. (3) C. REQUIRES | | | DIVIDER MEDIANS WHERE THERE ARE MORE THAN 3 CONSECUTIVE | | | ROWS OF PARKING. ALL AREAS OF PARKING MUST MEET THESE | | | REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 4. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A MINIMUM OF 75 | | | PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED | | | WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING AREA SHALL | | | BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE OF | | | CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE | | | AREAS AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 94-443(C)(3) FOR DIVIDER | | | ISLANDS, TERMINAL, AND INTERIOR ISLANDS. THE ONLY TREE | | | SPECIES LISTED ON THE PLANT LIST THAT ARE CATEGORY 1 | | | ARE THE LIVE OAK TREES. | | | | | | 5. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING LANDSCAPE AREAS | | | COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-443(C)(3) AND | | | (4) AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS. PROVIDE THE TOTAL | | | REQUIRED AND PROVIDED AS ONE TOTAL FOR BOTH SECTIONS. A | | | SEPARATE EXHIBIT PLAN MUST BE PROVIDED TO SHOW THE | | | AREAS COUNTED FOLLOWING THE DESCRIPTION OF AREAS AS | | | SHOWN IN FIGURE XIV-1. | | | | | | 6. THE TREE DISPOSITION CHART IS TO BE CORRECTED TO | | | SHOW COCONUT PALMS AS CATEGORY 3 WITH 100 SQ FT CANOPY | | | MITIGATION DUE. | | | | | | 7. PER SECTION 94-443(B), BUFFER LENGTHS REQUIRE ONE | | | TREE PER 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR EACH BUFFER | | | LENGTH AND A CONTINUOUS HEDGE. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED AND | | | PROVIDED BUFFER TREES IN A CHART WITH THE INDIVIDUAL | | | BUFFER SECTIONS IDENTIFIED AND THE BUFFER LENGTH EQUAL | | | TO THE SURVEY LENGTH. | | | | | | 8. BUFFERS NEED TO BE CONVERTED TO LANDSCAPE AREA FOR | | | REQUIRED TREES AND HEDGES ON THE EAST AND WEST SIDES OF | | | THE PROPERTY. THE CRAPE MYRTLE TREES ALONG SOUTHERN | | | BOULEVARD WERE PLANTED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER AND ARE | | | PART OF THE LANDSCAPING FOR THE SITE. THE NORTH 5 FOOT | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFER SHOULD BE CREATED INSIDE THE PROPERTY | | | LINE AND MEET THE REQUIREMENTS. THE RIGHT OF WAY | | | PLANTINGS WILL BE ACCEPTED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | SECTION 94-452 ROADWAY BEAUTIFICATION. | | | | | | 9. PER SECTION 94-443 (E)1., PROVIDE THE FOUNDATION | | | PLANTING CALCULATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR THE | | | ENTIRE BUILDING. | | | | | | | | | 10. PROVIDE THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF SUBSTITUTION | | | OF PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES. SECTION 94-442(D) REQUIRES | | | A 3:1 RATIO FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR PALMS EXCEPT THE | | | LISTED 1:1 SPECIES. | | | | | | 11. RECALCULATE THE SECTION IN THE LANDSCAPE DATA CHART | | | TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A | | | MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE | | | FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED | | | FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST | | | RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT | | | DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE | | | THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT | | | PLANTS BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST. | | | | | | | | | 12. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN AND REDESIGN THE LOCATIONS OF THE | | | LIGHTING ON SHORTER POLES TO RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH | | | TREES IN THE PARKING AREA LANDSCAPE ISLANDS. | | | | | | 13. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN, THERE ARE MULTIPLE CONFLICTS WITH TREES | | | PER THE CIVIL DRAWINGS. | | | | | | 14. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED VALVES AND | | | EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 15. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS ON THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-08-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
02-08-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
02-08-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-02-08 08:40:15 | NO FURTHER COMMENTS. | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-29-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
07-29-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
07-29-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-07-29 08:13:56 | PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS: | | | 1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID | | | WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE AND TYPE OF | | | THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR) THAT WILL BE | | | UTILIZED THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION | | | SERVICE. | | | 2- REVISED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL, SHEET C-912 TO | | | REFLECT THE LATEST REVISION (RELEASED OCTOBER 2020) OF | | | THE CITY ENCLOSURE. FOR A FREESTANDING SITE DUMPSTER | | | ENCLOSURE, THE ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST | | | REVISION OF CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL | | | CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE STANDARD, GC-7. | | | | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-07-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
05-07-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
05-07-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-05-07 15:11:22 | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS: | | | 1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID | | | WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE AND TYPE OF | | | THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR) THAT WILL BE | | | UTILIZED THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION | | | SERVICE. | | | 2- REVISED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL, SHEET C-912 TO | | | REFLECT THE LATEST REVISION OF THE CITY ENCLOSURE. FOR | | | A FREESTANDING SITE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, THE ENCLOSURE | | | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST REVISION OF CITY OF WEST | | | PALM BEACH GENERAL CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE | | | STANDARD, GC-7. | | | 3- AUTOTURN EXHIBIT (DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE TIRES | | | PATH) FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER TRUCK | | | WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECS: | | | - DUAL AXLES | | | - TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT | | | - TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT | | | - TURNING RADIUS: | | | - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT | | | - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT | | | - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-18-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
08-18-2021 |
Time |
09:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
08-18-2021 |
Time |
09:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-08-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
05-08-2021 |
Time |
23:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
05-08-2021 |
Time |
23:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-05-08 23:33:44 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE STORMWATER QUALITY TREATMENT FOR THE | | | REDEVELOPED AREA OF THE SITE PER SFWMD ERP CRITERIA. | | | | | | 2. LABEL THE VERTICAL DATUM AND ADD CONVERSION EQUATION | | | TO NGVD1929 ON ALL SHEETS WITH ELEVATION INFORMATION. | | | | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | | | | 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED | | | WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP PERMIT BEFORE THE | | | START OF CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 4. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED WITH THE | | | ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 (O) | | | 561-351-0510 (M) | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-17-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
08-17-2021 |
Time |
08:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-08-17 08:52:40 | 1. UNITY OF TITLE NOT REQUIRED AS UNITY OF CONTROL | | | EXISTS. | | | 2. UTILITY EASEMENTS WERE GRANTED UNDER THE UNITY OF | | | CONTROL. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-07-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
05-07-2021 |
Time |
10:30 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-05-07 10:38:22 | 1. SURVEY NEEDS SIGNED AND SEALED. | | | 2. LABEL PROPERTY CORNERS. | | | 3. SURVEY NEEDS TO BE BASED ON A TITLE SEARCH. | | | 4. ADD CONVERSION TO NGVD. | | | 5. UNITY OF TITLE REQUIRED FOR THE 2 PARCELS. | | | 6. CUSTOMER SERVICE WILL INVESTIGATE EXISTING WATER | | | MAIN IN REAR. UTILITY EASEMENT MAY BE REQUIRED OR | | | POSSIBLY A MASTER METER. | | | 7. THERE ARE GRADE DIFFERENTIALS ALONG ADJACENT | | | ROADWAYS THAT WILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-27-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
06-27-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
06-27-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-06-27 16:23:51 | 1) NOT APPLICABLE. PROVIDE TRAFFIC STUDY. THIS ITEM IS | | | NECESSARY TO OBTAIN THE TPS LETTER. PLEASE EXPAND THE | | | STUDY BY PROVIDING AN INTERSECTION ANALYSIS OF THE | | | SOUTHERN/PARKER AND SOUTHERN/LAKE INTERSECTIONS, | | | PROVIDE FUTURE CONDITION SCENARIO ASSUMING ROAD | | | CONFIGURATION ACCORDING TO FDOT I-95/SOUTHERN BLVD | | | INTERCHANGE AND FDOT SOUTHERN BLVD INTERCOASTAL BRIDGE | | | PROJECTS, AS THEY MAY IMPACT VEHICULAR MOVEMENTS AT THE | | | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DRIVEWAYS; ALSO INCLUDE REFERENCES | | | TO THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH BICYCLE MASTERPLAN. | | | PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE SOUTHERN BLVD DRIVEWAY, | | | INCLUSIVE OF A DIAGRAM SHOWCASING EXISTING/FUTURE | | | DAILY/PEAK HOUR TURNING VOLUMES. INDEPENDENTLY FROM | | | PALM BEACH COUNTY REQUIREMENTS, THE CITY CAN REQUEST | | | FURTHER ANALYSIS TO PROPERLY VALIDATE TRAFFIC | | | OPERATIONS AND INTERSECTIONS LEVEL OF SERVICE. | | | 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER. INDEPENDENTLY | | | FROM THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INCREASE/DECREASE OF | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE. A TRAFFIC ANALYSIS NEEDS TO BE | | | SUBMITTED TO THE COUNTY IN ORDER TO UPDATE THE TRAFFIC | | | GENERATORS' DATABASE AND IDENTIFY POTENTIAL IMPACT TO | | | THE ROAD SYSTEM. | | | 3) SATISFIED. EXPLAIN THE CHANGE IN DRIVEWAY | | | DIRECTIONALITY ON THE NORTHERN SIDE OF THE PARKING LOT. | | | OTHERWISE REVERT TO ORIGINAL CONFIGURATION | | | 4) SATISFIED. ALIGN PARKING AISLES' CENTERLINES WITH | | | THE NORTHERN DRIVEWAY LANE ONES | | | 5) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC | | | CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE | | | OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT | | | 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE | | | TRUCK AND SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE | | | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES | | | CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A | | | SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING | | | 7) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY | | | ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 | | | FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS | | | (CIRCUIT BOX AND ELECTRIC CONDUIT) | | | 8) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE | | | NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, | | | INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES | | | 9) SATISFIED. CROSSWALK BY ADA STALLS IS MIS-ALIGNED | | | WITH THE PARKING ISLE PATHWAY. SHEET C-302 DEPICTS A | | | SLANTED CROSSWALK | | | 10) SATISFIED. PROVIDE OR INDICATE DOCUMENT SHEET | | | DEPICTING ROAD, DRIVING ISLE, SIDEWALK AND DRIVEWAY | | | DIMENSIONS. SHEET C-302 DOES NOT SHOW ROADWAYS NOR | | | DRIVEWAYS DIMENSION | | | 11) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS FOR | | | EACH MISSING ELEMENT DEPICTED IN CITY CODE CHAPTER 94 | | | ARTICLE XV FIGURE XV-2. SPECIFICALLY: (C) STALL DEPTH, | | | (E) CURB LENGTH, (F) HALF-BAY, (G) FULL BAY. IF ALREADY | | | PROVIDED, PLEASE INDICATE SHEET NUMBER. | | | 12) SATISFIED. VERIFY THAT SIDEWALK WIDTH ALONG | | | NOTTINGHAM BLVD FULFILLS MINIMUM ADA STANDARDS | | | REQUIREMENT OF 36 INCHES UN-OBSTRUCTED (I.E. NO LIGHT | | | POLES WITHIN SUCH WIDTH | | | 13) SATISFIED. THE ADOPTED CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN | | | REQUIRES PROTECTED SEPARATED BICYCLE LANES ALONG | | | NOTTINGHAM BLVD. PLEASE REVISE PROPOSED ROADWAY DESIGN | | | ALONG SITE FRONTAGE ACCORDINGLY | | | 14) SATISFIED. PER CITY CODE SEC 94-111(O)3: CURB CUTS, | | | PARKING ENTRANCES, EXITS, AND DRIVEWAYS SHALL NOT BE | | | WIDER THAN 25 FEET AS MEASURED PARALLEL TO THE STREET | | | AT THE CURB. TWO-WAY DRIVEWAY GREATER THAN 25 FEET | | | COULD BE PROVIDED ONLY WHEN ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY AND | | | JUSTIFIED WITH AUTOTURN, IN WHICH CASE CHANNELIZING | | | DIAGONAL HATCHING/CHEVRON MARKINGS SHOULD BE USED TO | | | DELINEATE DRIVEWAY LANES FOR PASSENGER CARS. | | | 15) SATISFIED. AT THE DRIVEWAYS INTERFACE THE SIDEWALK | | | OR WALKWAY SHALL BE CONTINUOUS AND REMAIN AT A CONSTANT | | | LEVEL AT ALL INSTANCES | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-16-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
05-16-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-05-16 17:01:04 | 1) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE TRAFFIC STUDY. THIS | | | ITEM IS NECESSARY TO OBTAIN THE TPS LETTER. PLEASE | | | EXPAND THE STUDY BY PROVIDING AN INTERSECTION ANALYSIS | | | OF THE SOUTHERN/PARKER AND SOUTHERN/LAKE INTERSECTIONS, | | | PROVIDE FUTURE CONDITION SCENARIO ASSUMING ROAD | | | CONFIGURATION ACCORDING TO FDOT I-95/SOUTHERN BLVD | | | INTERCHANGE AND FDOT SOUTHERN BLVD INTERCOASTAL BRIDGE | | | PROJECTS, AS THEY MAY IMPACT VEHICULAR MOVEMENTS AT THE | | | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DRIVEWAYS; ALSO INCLUDE REFERENCES | | | TO THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH BICYCLE MASTERPLAN. | | | PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE SOUTHERN BLVD DRIVEWAY, | | | INCLUSIVE OF A DIAGRAM SHOWCASING EXISTING/FUTURE | | | DAILY/PEAK HOUR TURNING VOLUMES. INDEPENDENTLY FROM | | | PALM BEACH COUNTY REQUIREMENTS, THE CITY CAN REQUEST | | | FURTHER ANALYSIS TO PROPERLY VALIDATE TRAFFIC | | | OPERATIONS AND INTERSECTIONS LEVEL OF SERVICE. | | | 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER. INDEPENDENTLY | | | FROM THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INCREASE/DECREASE OF | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE. A TRAFFIC ANALYSIS NEEDS TO BE | | | SUBMITTED TO THE COUNTY IN ORDER TO UPDATE THE TRAFFIC | | | GENERATORS' DATABASE AND IDENTIFY POTENTIAL IMPACT TO | | | THE ROAD SYSTEM. | | | 3) SATISFIED. EXPLAIN THE CHANGE IN DRIVEWAY | | | DIRECTIONALITY ON THE NORTHERN SIDE OF THE PARKING LOT. | | | OTHERWISE REVERT TO ORIGINAL CONFIGURATION | | | 4) SATISFIED. ALIGN PARKING AISLES' CENTERLINES WITH | | | THE NORTHERN DRIVEWAY LANE ONES | | | 5) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC | | | CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE | | | OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT | | | 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE | | | TRUCK AND SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE | | | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES | | | CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A | | | SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING | | | 7) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY | | | ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 | | | FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS | | | (CIRCUIT BOX AND ELECTRIC CONDUIT) | | | 8) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE | | | NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, | | | INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES | | | 9) SATISFIED. CROSSWALK BY ADA STALLS IS MIS-ALIGNED | | | WITH THE PARKING ISLE PATHWAY. SHEET C-302 DEPICTS A | | | SLANTED CROSSWALK | | | 10) SATISFIED. PROVIDE OR INDICATE DOCUMENT SHEET | | | DEPICTING ROAD, DRIVING ISLE, SIDEWALK AND DRIVEWAY | | | DIMENSIONS. SHEET C-302 DOES NOT SHOW ROADWAYS NOR | | | DRIVEWAYS DIMENSION | | | 11) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS FOR | | | EACH MISSING ELEMENT DEPICTED IN CITY CODE CHAPTER 94 | | | ARTICLE XV FIGURE XV-2. SPECIFICALLY: (C) STALL DEPTH, | | | (E) CURB LENGTH, (F) HALF-BAY, (G) FULL BAY. IF ALREADY | | | PROVIDED, PLEASE INDICATE SHEET NUMBER. | | | 12) SATISFIED. VERIFY THAT SIDEWALK WIDTH ALONG | | | NOTTINGHAM BLVD FULFILLS MINIMUM ADA STANDARDS | | | REQUIREMENT OF 36 INCHES UN-OBSTRUCTED (I.E. NO LIGHT | | | POLES WITHIN SUCH WIDTH). UNTIL FULL VERIFICATION, THIS | | | ITEM WILL BE A KEPT AS A CONDITIONAL APPROVAL | | | 13) SATISFIED. THE ADOPTED CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN | | | REQUIRES PROTECTED SEPARATED BICYCLE LANES ALONG | | | NOTTINGHAM BLVD. PLEASE REVISE PROPOSED ROADWAY DESIGN | | | ALONG SITE FRONTAGE ACCORDINGLY | | | 14) PER CITY CODE SEC 94-111(O)3: CURB CUTS, PARKING | | | ENTRANCES, EXITS, AND DRIVEWAYS SHALL NOT BE WIDER THAN | | | 25 FEET AS MEASURED PARALLEL TO THE STREET AT THE CURB. | | | TWO-WAY DRIVEWAY GREATER THAN 25 FEET COULD BE PROVIDED | | | ONLY WHEN ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY AND JUSTIFIED WITH | | | AUTOTURN, IN WHICH CASE CHANNELIZING DIAGONAL | | | HATCHING/CHEVRON MARKINGS SHOULD BE USED TO DELINEATE | | | DRIVEWAY LANES FOR PASSENGER CARS. | | | 15) AT THE DRIVEWAYS INTERFACE THE SIDEWALK OR WALKWAY | | | SHALL BE CONTINUOUS AND REMAIN AT A CONSTANT LEVEL AT | | | ALL INSTANCES | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-28-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
01-28-2022 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-01-28 19:56:52 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS | | | 1) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE TRAFFIC STUDY. THIS | | | ITEM IS NECESSARY TO OBTAIN THE TPS LETTER. PLEASE | | | EXPAND THE STUDY BY PROVIDING AN INTERSECTION ANALYSIS | | | OF THE SOUTHERN/PARKER AND SOUTHERN/LAKE INTERSECTIONS, | | | PROVIDE FUTURE CONDITION SCENARIO ASSUMING ROAD | | | CONFIGURATION ACCORDING TO FDOT I-95/SOUTHERN BLVD | | | INTERCHANGE AND FDOT SOUTHERN BLVD INTERCOASTAL BRIDGE | | | PROJECTS, AS THEY MAY IMPACT VEHICULAR MOVEMENTS AT THE | | | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DRIVEWAYS; ALSO INCLUDE REFERENCES | | | TO THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH BICYCLE MASTERPLAN. | | | PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE SOUTHERN BLVD DRIVEWAY, | | | INCLUSIVE OF A DIAGRAM SHOWCASING EXISTING/FUTURE | | | DAILY/PEAK HOUR TURNING VOLUMES | | | 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER. INDEPENDENTLY | | | FROM THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INCREASE/DECREASE OF | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE. A TRAFFIC ANALYSIS NEEDS TO BE | | | SUBMITTED TO THE COUNTY IN ORDER TO UPDATE THE TRAFFIC | | | GENERATORS? DATABASE AND IDENTIFY POTENTIAL IMPACT TO | | | THE ROAD SYSTEM. | | | 3) SATISFIED. EXPLAIN THE CHANGE IN DRIVEWAY | | | DIRECTIONALITY ON THE NORTHERN SIDE OF THE PARKING LOT. | | | OTHERWISE REVERT TO ORIGINAL CONFIGURATION | | | 4) SATISFIED. ALIGN PARKING AISLES? CENTERLINES WITH | | | THE NORTHERN DRIVEWAY LANE ONES | | | 5) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC | | | CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE | | | OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT | | | 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE | | | TRUCK AND SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE | | | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES | | | CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A | | | SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING | | | 7) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY | | | ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 | | | FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS | | | (CIRCUIT BOX AND ELECTRIC CONDUIT) | | | 8) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE | | | NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, | | | INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES | | | 9) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. CROSSWALK BY ADA STALLS IS | | | MIS-ALIGNED WITH THE PARKING ISLE PATHWAY. SHEET C-302 | | | DEPICTS A SLANTED CROSSWALK | | | 10) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE OR INDICATE DOCUMENT | | | SHEET DEPICTING ROAD, DRIVING ISLE, SIDEWALK AND | | | DRIVEWAY DIMENSIONS. SHEET C-302 DOES NOT SHOW ROADWAYS | | | NOR DRIVEWAYS DIMENSION | | | 11) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS FOR | | | EACH MISSING ELEMENT DEPICTED IN CITY CODE CHAPTER 94 | | | ARTICLE XV FIGURE XV-2. SPECIFICALLY: (C) STALL DEPTH, | | | (E) CURB LENGTH, (F) HALF-BAY, (G) FULL BAY. IF ALREADY | | | PROVIDED, PLEASE INDICATE SHEET NUMBER | | | 12) NOT SATISFIED. VERIFY THAT SIDEWALK WIDTH ALONG | | | NOTTINGHAM BLVD FULFILLS MINIMUM ADA STANDARDS | | | REQUIREMENT OF 36 INCHES UN-OBSTRUCTED (I.E. NO LIGHT | | | POLES WITHIN SUCH WIDTH) | | | 13) NOT SATISFIED. THE ADOPTED CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN | | | REQUIRES PROTECTED SEPARATED BICYCLE LANES ALONG | | | NOTTINGHAM BLVD. PLEASE REVISE PROPOSED ROADWAY DESIGN | | | ALONG SITE FRONTAGE ACCORDINGLY | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-25-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
08-25-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-08-25 15:43:16 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS | | | 1) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE TRAFFIC STUDY. THIS ITEM IS | | | NECESSARY TO OBTAIN THE TPS LETTER. | | | 2) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER. | | | INDEPENDENTLY FROM THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT | | | INCREASE/DECREASE OF SQUARE FOOTAGE. A TRAFFIC ANALYSIS | | | NEEDS TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE COUNTY IN ORDER TO UPDATE | | | THE TRAFFIC GENERATORS DATABASE AND IDENTIFY POTENTIAL | | | IMPACT TO THE ROAD SYSTEM. | | | | | | SITE COMMENTS | | | 3) SATISFIED. EXPLAIN THE CHANGE IN DRIVEWAY | | | DIRECTIONALITY ON THE NORTHERN SIDE OF THE PARKING LOT. | | | OTHERWISE REVERT TO ORIGINAL CONFIGURATION. | | | 4) SATISFIED. ALIGN PARKING AISLES? CENTERLINES WITH | | | THE NORTHERN DRIVEWAY LANE ONES | | | 5) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC | | | CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE | | | OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT | | | 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE | | | TRUCK AND SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE | | | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES | | | CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A | | | SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING | | | 7) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY | | | ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 | | | FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS | | | (CIRCUIT BOX AND ELECTRIC CONDUIT) | | | 8) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE | | | NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, | | | INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES | | | 9) NOT SATISFIED. CROSSWALK BY ADA STALLS IS | | | MIS-ALIGNED WITH THE PARKING ISLE PATHWAY | | | 10) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE OR INDICATE DOCUMENT SHEET | | | DEPICTING ROAD, DRIVING ISLE, SIDEWALK AND DRIVEWAY | | | DIMENSIONS. | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-07-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
05-07-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
05-03-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-05-07 11:54:55 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS | | | 1) PROVIDE TRAFFIC STUDY | | | 2) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | | | | SITE COMMENTS | | | 1) EXPLAIN THE CHANGE IN DRIVEWAY DIRECTIONALITY ON THE | | | NORTHERN SIDE OF THE PARKING LOT. OTHERWISE REVERT TO | | | ORIGINAL CONFIGURATION. | | | 2) ALIGN PARKING AISLES' CENTERLINES WITH THE NORTHERN | | | DRIVEWAY LANE ONES | | | 3) ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS | | | (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE | | | OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT | | | 4) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND | | | SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES CLEARLY | | | DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE | | | FILE/DRAWING | | | 5) IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY ACCESSIBLE | | | MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 FEET) AND | | | PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS (CIRCUIT BOX | | | AND ELECTRIC CONDUIT) | | | 6) PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF | | | REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA | | | AND BICYCLE ONES | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-17-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
08-17-2022 |
Time |
18:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
07-18-2022 |
Time |
10:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-19-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
05-19-2022 |
Time |
16:25 |
Rev Time |
1.50 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
05-19-2022 |
Time |
11:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-05-19 16:26:36 | INFORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW 21-05 - APRIL 20, 2022 | | | RESUBMITTAL | | | PUBLIX @ SOUTHDALE | | | 804 SOUTHERN BOULEVARD | | | | | | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446, | | | [email protected] | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE | | | (3) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT | | | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS | | | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS | | | FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY JUNE 20, 2022), THE | | | PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT THAT THE | | | CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL | | | REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | ADDITIONAL RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF | | | PREVIOUSLY ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE | | | SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED | | | A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL | | | APPLICATION FEE ($200). | | | | | | 1) UPDATED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE GENERAL | | | PARKING DIMENSION DETAIL TABLE; HOWEVER, THE STALL | | | DEPTH THAT YOU HAVE LISTED FOR 45 ST AT 17.75 IS NOT | | | ACTUALLY THE STALL DEPTH IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MEASURE | | | REQUIRED BY STALL PAINTING DETAIL "C", AND AS LISTED | | | DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM CODE REQUIRED STALL DEPTH. | | | WHEN SCALING THE PLAN, THE "C" DEPTH IS CLOSER TO 21 | | | FEET IN DEPTH (YOUR CAD MEASURE WILL BE ACCURATE). YOU | | | DO NOT NEED TO UPDATE THE SITE PLAN DIMENSIONS, BUT YOU | | | WILL NEED TO UPDATE THE TABLE TO SHOW THE CORRECT STALL | | | DEPTH DIMENSION. | | | | | | 2) UPDATED COMMENT: NOT ALL THE SCREEN WALL LOCATIONS | | | ARE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS - THE PUBLIX COMPACTOR | | | SCREEN WALL IS MISSING. | | | | | | 3) STAFF WILL BE ISSUING A REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION FOR | | | THE WEST SIDE RAMP AND HANDRAIL. PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED | | | ELEVATION DRAWINGS THAT SHOW THE RAMP AND HANDRAIL, TO | | | INCLUDE THE HEIGHT OF EACH AT THE HIGHEST POINTS. THE | | | REVISED ELEVATION DRAWINGS SHALL INCLUDE ALL UPDATED | | | PLAN ELEMENTS BUT DOES NOT NEED TO BE IN COLOR. | | | | | | 4) CONDITION (DRAFT): THE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA | | | MUST BE PROVIDED WITH BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS | | | CONSISTING OF AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V CIRCUIT) AND | | | 2-INCH SCHEDULE 40 PVC ELECTRIC CONDUIT TO THE POWER | | | SOURCE. THE ELECTRICAL READINESS MUST BE APPROVED BY | | | THE CITY'S TRAFFIC ENGINEER AND INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE | | | CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THE NEW PUBLIX. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-07-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
02-07-2022 |
Time |
09:57 |
Rev Time |
2.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
02-04-2022 |
Time |
14:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-02-07 09:56:39 | INFORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW 21-05 - DECEMBER 14, 2021 | | | RESUBMITTAL | | | PUBLIX @ SOUTHDALE | | | 804 SOUTHERN BOULEVARD | | | | | | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446, | | | [email protected] | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE | | | (3) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT | | | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS | | | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS | | | FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY APRIL 7, 2021), THE | | | PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT THAT THE | | | CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL | | | REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | ADDITIONAL RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF | | | PREVIOUSLY ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE | | | SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED | | | A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL | | | APPLICATION FEE ($200). | | | | | | 1) UPDATED COMMENT: PROVIDE THE COMCAST, AND WEST PALM | | | BEACH UTILITY LETTER APPROVALS. | | | | | | 2) UPDATED COMMENT: PARKING DETAILS ARE REQUIRED FOR | | | ALL CONDITIONS. NO PARKING DETAILS WERE PROVIDED. | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT THE WHEEL STOPS SHOWN ADJACENT TO THE | | | BUILDING DO NOT MEET THE CODE REQUIRED TWO FEET FROM | | | THE END OF THE PARKING SPACE. | | | | | | 3) REPEAT COMMENT: THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REQUIREMENTS REQUIRE THAT PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE ISLANDS | | | BE THE FULL LENGTH OF THE PARKING SPACE. THE PLANS DO | | | NOT COMPLY WITH THIS REQUIREMENT. YOU MUST EITHER | | | LENGTHEN THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS OR STRIPE THE SPACES TO | | | NOT EXCEED THE ISLAND LENGTH. NOTE: THE ISLANDS SCALE | | | TO THE MEET THE MINIMUM PARKING STALL LENGTH, SO THE | | | ISLANDS CAN STAY THE LENGTH AS SHOWN IF THE STALL | | | LENGTH IS REDUCED. | | | | | | 4) UPDATED COMMENT: NOT ALL THE SCREEN WALL LOCATIONS | | | ARE SHOWN ON THE CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. THE CITY | | | DOES NOT PERMIT CHAIN LINK FENCES TO SCREEN GENERATORS, | | | WHICH IS WHAT IS CALLED OUT ON THE ELEVATION PLAN. | | | | | | 5) THE BICYCLE RACK AT THE BANK NEEDS TO HAVE 24 INCHES | | | ON EACH SIDE OF THE RACK, NOT 24 INCHES OF WIDTH. | | | | | | 6) UPDATED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE | | | COMPACTOR SCREENING DETAILS ON THE ELEVATION PLANS; | | | HOWEVER, THE ENCLOSURE IS NOT SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN AS | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | 7) UPDATED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE | | | LOCATION OF THE LIGHTING IN THE PARKING LOT. THERE ARE | | | SEVERAL POLES LOCATED WITHIN THE PARKING FIELD BETWEEN | | | PARKING SPACES. PROVIDE DETAILS THAT INCLUDE THE | | | DIMENSION OF THE POLE AND ANY BOLLARDS OR OTHER | | | PROTECTIVE DEVICES OVERLAID ON A TO SCALE PARKING STALL | | | LAYOUT SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE PROPOSED | | | LAYOUT STILL PERMITS THE PARKING SPACES TO MEET CODE | | | REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 8) IN AN EMAIL TO LENS LUBIN, DATED SEPTEMBER 9, 2021, | | | IN WHICH STAFF MADE AN IN-PROGRESS REVIEW OF THE PLANS, | | | STAFF PROVIDED THE ADDITIONAL COMMENT BELOW, WHICH WAS | | | NOT ADDRESSED AS PART OF THIS RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | THE COLOR ELEVATIONS DO NOT SHOW THE PROPOSED RAMP | | | ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING. THE HEIGHT OF THE | | | TOP OF THE RAIL MUST BE PROVIDED. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS | | | RAMP ENCROACHES INTO THE REQUIRED SETBACK AND LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFER AND UNLESS IT IS SPECIFICALLY THERE TO MEET ADA | | | REQUIREMENTS IT IS NOT PERMITTED. IF IT IS FOR ADA | | | PURPOSES AND THE PURPOSED CANNOT BE ACHIEVED BY ANOTHER | | | METHOD, YOU MUST SUBMIT A LETTER WITH YOUR RESUBMITTAL | | | REQUESTING A REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION DETERMINATION | | | BASED ON THE RAMP BEING INSTALLED TO MEET ADA | | | PROVISIONS (PLEASE INCLUDE THE ADA CODE CITATION MET) | | | AND THEN THE CITY WILL GRANT THE REASONABLE | | | ACCOMMODATION TO WAIVE THE REQUIREMENT TO COMPLY WITH | | | THE SETBACK AND LANDSCAPE BUFFER ENCROACHMENT. NOTE: | | | THE TOP OF THE RAIL FROM GRADE MAY NOT EXCEED 6 FEET OR | | | IT ALSO FALLS UNDER THE REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION | | | WAIVER. | | | | | | 9) CONDITION (DRAFT): THE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA | | | MUST BE PROVIDED WITH BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS | | | CONSISTING OF AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V CIRCUIT) AND | | | 2-INCH SCHEDULE 40 PVC ELECTRIC CONDUIT TO THE POWER | | | SOURCE. THE ELECTRICAL READINESS MUST BE APPROVED BY | | | THE CITY'S TRAFFIC ENGINEER AND INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE | | | CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THE NEW PUBLIX. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-16-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
08-16-2021 |
Time |
14:10 |
Rev Time |
2.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
08-16-2021 |
Time |
10:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-08-16 14:11:01 | INFORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW 21-05 - JULY 20, 2021 | | | RESUBMITTAL | | | PUBLIX @ SOUTHDALE | | | 804 SOUTHERN BOULEVARD | | | | | | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446, | | | [email protected] | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE | | | (3) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT | | | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS | | | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS | | | FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY OCTOBER 16, 2021), | | | THE PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT THAT THE | | | CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL | | | REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | ADDITIONAL RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF | | | PREVIOUSLY ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE | | | SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED | | | A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL | | | APPLICATION FEE ($200). | | | | | | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE A TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT | | | VERIFYING THAT THE NEW DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT INCREASE | | | VEHICLE TRIPS. IF THE TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT SHOWS | | | THAT THERE IS AN INCREASE IN TRAFFIC TRIPS, THEN YOU | | | MUST PROVIDE A TPS APPROVAL LETTER FROM PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY. **** THE COMMENT RESPONSE STATES THAT A | | | CERTIFIED TRAFFIC ENGINEER STATED THAT A TRAFFIC STUDY | | | WAS IS NOT NEEDED. YOU NEED TO SUBMIT | | | | | | 2) UPDATED COMMENT: PROVIDE THE FPL, FPU, COMCAST, AND | | | WEST PALM BEACH UTILITY LETTER APPROVALS. | | | | | | 3) BASED ON THE ENTIRE SITE BEING ONE PARCEL, YOU MUST | | | USE THE TOTAL SITE ACREAGE IN YOUR SITE DATA | | | CALCULATIONS ON THE CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS - 380,133 | | | SF (8.727 ACRES). NOTE: THE LANDSCAPE PLANS MUST REMOVE | | | THE ERRONEOUS REFERENCE TO THE PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 4) THE PLANS SHOW THAT THE PARKING LOT IS BEING MILLED | | | AND RESURFACED. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, THIS REQUIRES THE PARKING LOT, | | | INCLUDING THE PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFERS, TO BE | | | BROUGHT INTO CONFORMANCE WITH THE CURRENT LANDSCAPE | | | REQUIREMENTS. PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS FOR THE PERIMETER | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFERS AROUND THE ENTIRE SITE. THESE BUFFERS | | | MUST BE AT LEAST FIVE (5) FEET IN WIDTH AND CONTAIN THE | | | REQUIRED LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. **** THIS WAS NOT | | | PROVIDED. SEE LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMENTS FOR MORE | | | INFORMATION. | | | | | | 5) A ROUGH CALCULATION OF THE NEW CONSTRUCTION VALUE | | | BASED ON THE INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL (ICC), BUILDING | | | VALUATION DATA (BVD) TABLE SHOWS THAT THE NEW | | | CONSTRUCTION WILL EXCEED 50% OF THE VALUE OF THE | | | EXISTING STRUCTURE. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZONING AND | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, THE ENTIRE SITE NEEDS BE | | | BROUGHT INTO CONFORMANCE WITH THE LANDSCAPE | | | REQUIREMENTS, INCLUDING FOUNDATION PLANTING AND, | | | MINIMUM SITE LANDSCAPE PERCENTAGE. **** THIS WAS NOT | | | PROVIDED. SEE LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMENTS FOR MORE | | | INFORMATION. | | | | | | | | | 6) UPDATED COMMENT: PLEASE VERIFY THAT ALL PARKING ROWS | | | ARE PROVIDING A 45-DEGREE ANGLE. THIS IS NOT SHOWN ON | | | EACH ROW AT THE MAIN PARKING FIELD NOR FOR THE PARKING | | | ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING. PARKING DETAILS ARE | | | REQUIRED FOR ALL CONDITIONS. | | | | | | 7) THE DIMENSION LINE ON THE PLAN FOR THE STALL DEPTHS | | | IS NOT USING THE CORRECT MEASURE POINTS. STAFF IS | | | UNABLE TO VERIFY THAT THE STALL DEPTHS COMPLY WITH THE | | | ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 8) THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS REQUIRE | | | THAT PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE ISLANDS BE THE FULL LENGTH | | | OF THE PARKING SPACE. THE PLANS DO NOT COMPLY WITH THIS | | | REQUIREMENT. | | | | | | 9) REPEAT COMMENT: THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT CLEARLY SHOW | | | WHERE THE STOREFRONT BOLLARDS AND GUARD RAILS ARE | | | LOCATED. **** THESE NEED TO BE LABELED ON THE SITE | | | PLAN. | | | | | | 10) THANK YOU FOR SHOWING THE SCREEN WALLS FOR THE | | | COMPACTOR AND THE GENERATOR ON THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE THE HEIGHT DIMENSIONS ON THE ELEVATIONS | | | AND THE SCREEN WALL LOCATIONS ON THE CIVIL AND | | | LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | | | | 11) PROVIDE DIMENSIONS OF THE NEW DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES | | | ON THE PLANS. | | | | | | 12) ALL THE COLUMNS FOR THE BUILDING OVERHANG NEED TO | | | BE REFLECTED ON THE CIVIL PLAN AS THE COLUMN LOCATIONS | | | IMPACT BOTH CAR AND BICYCLE PARKING. | | | | | | 13) THANK YOU FOR SHOWING BICYCLE RACKS ALONG THE FRONT | | | OF THE BUILDING. | | | | | | A. THE PLANS MUST CLEARLY SHOW THE REQUIRED PAD DEPTH | | | OF SIX (6) FEET AND 24 INCHES ON EITHER SIDE OF THE | | | RACK (30 INCHES IS RACKS ARE IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO | | | EACH OTHER INSTEAD OF SPREAD OUT). | | | | | | B. HOW WILL THE CARS PARKING IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING | | | BE PREVENTED FROM OVERHANGING THE CURB (EX. WILL WHEEL | | | STOPS BE PROVIDED)? THE CURRENT PLANS SHOW THAT AN | | | OVERHANG IS POSSIBLE; HOWEVER, THIS OVERHANG DIRECTLY | | | CONFLICTS WITH ANY BICYCLES THAT ARE PARKED IN THE | | | BICYCLE RACKS AS SHOWN. | | | | | | C. IN ORDER TO PROVIDE WEATHER PROTECTION FOR PARKED | | | BICYCLES, THE RACKS SHOULD BE MOVED UNDER THE ROOF | | | OVERHANG. | | | | | | D. THE PUBLIX IS THE ANCHOR OF THIS SHOPPING PLAZA AND | | | AS SUCH NEEDS TO HAVE A SOME OF THE BICYCLE RACKS | | | CLOSER TO THE ENTRANCE, BOTH FOR CUSTOMERS AND | | | EMPLOYEES. | | | | | | 14) PLEASE DESCRIBE THE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION THAT IS | | | NOW SHOWN ON THE PLANS. | | | | | | 15) PROVIDE THE DETAILS OF THE COMPACTOR SCREENING. IT | | | IS NOT PERMITTED TO SIT ON A PAD UNSCREENED AS SHOWN IN | | | PERSPECTIVE #2. | | | | | | 16) REPEAT COMMENT: THERE SEEMS TO BE A DISCREPANCY | | | BETWEEN THE PERSPECTIVE DRAWINGS AND THE COLOR | | | ELEVATIONS ON THE REAR PARAPET WALL. THE PERSPECTIVES | | | CLEARLY SHOW A PARAPET THAT WILL HIDE THE ROOFTOP | | | EQUIPMENT; HOWEVER, THE ELEVATIONS DO NOT SHOW A REAR | | | PARAPET. **** THE PERSPECTIVE DRAWINGS CLEARLY SHOW THE | | | SIDE AND REAR PARAPET WALLS AT THE SAME HEIGHT. THE | | | REAR OF THE SIDE PARAPET WALLS IS VISIBLE AND EXTENDING | | | HIGHER THAN WHAT IS SHOWN AS THE HIGH POINT OF THE REAR | | | OF THE BUILDING. THE REAR PARAPET NEEDS TO BE | | | ACCURATELY DEPICTED SO STAFF CAN BE CONFIDENT THAT THE | | | ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED (AS SHOWN | | | ON THE PERSPECTIVE DRAWINGS). PROVIDE THE HEIGHT TO THE | | | ROOF AND THE TOP OF THE REAR PARAPET ON THE ELEVATIONS | | | (COLOR ELEVATIONS ARE NOT REQUIRED). | | | | | | 17) IS NEW LIGHTING BEING PROPOSED ON THE SITE? | | | LIGHTING NEEDS TO BE CLEARLY SHOWN ON THE CIVIL AND | | | LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-13-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
05-13-2021 |
Time |
11:53 |
Rev Time |
2.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
05-13-2021 |
Time |
11:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-05-13 11:53:36 | INFORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW 21-05 | | | PUBLIX @ SOUTHDALE | | | 804 SOUTHERN BOULEVARD | | | | | | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446, | | | [email protected] | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR | | | (4) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT | | | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS | | | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS | | | FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS/THE PPRC MEETING (BY | | | JULY 13, 2021), THE PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE | | | APPLICANT THAT THE CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY | | | FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT | | | APPLICATION. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($200). | | | | | | 1) PROVIDE A TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT VERIFYING THAT | | | THE NEW DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT INCREASE VEHICLE TRIPS. IF | | | THE TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT SHOWS THAT THERE IS AN | | | INCREASE IN TRAFFIC TRIPS, THEN YOU MUST PROVIDE A TPS | | | APPROVAL LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY. | | | | | | 2) PROVIDE A PREDETERMINATION LETTER FROM FDOT | | | APPROVING THE MODIFICATION TO THE INGRESS/EGRESS | | | (REVERSAL) FROM SOUTHERN BOULEVARD AND THAT ACCESS WILL | | | CONTINUE TO MEET THEIR STANDARDS WITH THE | | | REDEVELOPMENT. THIS LETTER IS FROM FDOT ACCESS | | | MANAGEMENT. | | | | | | 3) PROVIDE WRITTEN VERIFICATION FROM FDOT INTERCHANGE | | | DIVISION (HUMBERTO ARRIETA) THAT YOUR PROPOSAL WILL NOT | | | IMPACT OR BE IMPACTED BY (EX: RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDENING) | | | THE SOUTHERN BOULEVARD I-95 INTERCHANGE PROJECT. THIS | | | IS DIFFERENT FROM THE LETTER IN #2 ABOVE. | | | | | | 4) PROVIDE AN ALTA SURVEY. A SKETCH OF BOUNDARY SURVEY | | | DOES NOT MEET CITY APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 5) PROVIDE THE FPL, FPU, COMCAST, AT&T AND WEST PALM | | | BEACH UTILITY LETTER APPROVALS. | | | | | | 6) THE CITY HAS NO RECORD OF APPROVING A LOT SPLIT OR | | | MINOR SUBDIVISION TO CREATE THE PARCEL ON WHICH WELLS | | | FARGO EXISTS. A UNITY OF TITLE IS REQUIRED TO REJOIN | | | THIS NOT LEGALLY SUBDIVIDED PARCEL WITH THE PARENT | | | PARCEL. | | | | | | 7) THE PLANS SHOW THAT THE PARKING LOT IS BEING MILLED | | | AND RESURFACED. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, THIS REQUIRES THE PARKING LOT, | | | INCLUDING THE PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFERS, TO BE | | | BROUGHT INTO CONFORMANCE WITH THE CURRENT LANDSCAPE | | | REQUIREMENTS. PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS FOR THE PERIMETER | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFERS AROUND THE ENTIRE SITE. THESE BUFFERS | | | MUST BE AT LEAST FIVE (5) FEET IN WIDTH AND CONTAIN THE | | | REQUIRED LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. | | | | | | 8) A ROUGH CALCULATION OF THE NEW CONSTRUCTION VALUE | | | BASED ON THE INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL (ICC), BUILDING | | | VALUATION DATA (BVD) TABLE SHOWS THAT THE NEW | | | CONSTRUCTION WILL EXCEED 50% OF THE VALUE OF THE | | | EXISTING STRUCTURE. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZONING AND | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, THE ENTIRE SITE NEEDS BE | | | BROUGHT INTO CONFORMANCE WITH THE LANDSCAPE | | | REQUIREMENTS, INCLUDING FOUNDATION PLANTING AND, | | | MINIMUM SITE LANDSCAPE PERCENTAGE. | | | | | | 9) THE SITE DATA TABLE LISTS THE PROVIDED FAR AS 25.38, | | | WHICH IS NOT CORRECT. | | | | | | 10) THE PARKING DETAIL ON SHEET C-901 SHOWS A 60-DEGREE | | | PARKING ANGLE, WHICH REQUIRES AN 18-FOOT PARKING AISLE | | | WIDTH AND A 19 FOOT 10 INCH STALL DEPTH, NEITHER OF | | | WHICH ARE SHOWN MEETING CODE ON THE SITE LAYOUT PLAN. | | | NOTE: THE GENERIC PARKING LOT DESIGN ON C-902 DOES NOT | | | MATCH THE SITE PLAN AND NEEDS TO BE REMOVED OR SHOW | | | CORRECT CONDITIONS. STAFF CANNOT VERIFY PARKING | | | COMPLIANCE WITHOUT THE ACCURATE DATA. | | | | | | 11) THE CITY DOES NOT PERMIT DEAD END PARKING ROWS. | | | BOTH PARKING AREAS AT THE REAR OF THE BUILDING NEED TO | | | HAVE A TURNAROUND SPACE. | | | | | | 12) THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT CLEARLY SHOW WHERE THE | | | STOREFRONT BOLLARDS AND GUARD RAILS ARE LOCATED. | | | | | | 13) THERE ARE 20, NOT 18 ADA SPACES ON THE SITE. THE | | | DATA TABLE NEEDS TO LIST THE CORRECT VALUE. | | | | | | 14) THE PLANS NEED TO SHOW DIMENSIONAL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | THE CITY'S LOADING SPACE REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 15) PROVIDE DETAILS ON THE SCREENING OF THE STANDBY AND | | | EMERGENCY GENERATORS THAT MEET CITY REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 16) THE SITE REQUIRES 19 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES. THESE | | | NEED TO BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOUT | | | THE SITE. PROVIDE THE DETAILS THAT COMPLY WITH CITY | | | CODE. | | | | | | 17) PROVIDE THE DETAILS OF THE COMPACTOR SCREENING. IT | | | IS NOT PERMITTED TO SIT ON A PAD UNSCREENED AS SHOWN IN | | | PERSPECTIVE #2. | | | | | | 18) THERE SEEMS TO BE A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE | | | PERSPECTIVE DRAWINGS AND THE COLOR ELEVATIONS ON THE | | | REAR PARAPET WALL. THE PERSPECTIVES CLEARLY SHOW A | | | PARAPET THAT WILL HIDE THE ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT; HOWEVER, | | | THE ELEVATIONS DO NOT SHOW A REAR PARAPET. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |