| 2021-03-29 14:02:11 | 1.) THE APPLICATION NUMBER IS FSPR 16-03B (NOT FSPR |
| | 16-03). PLEASE CORRECT IN THE SITE DATA TABULAR. FOR |
| | FUTURE REFERENCE, IT MAY BE EASIER NOT TO INCLUDE A |
| | CITY APPLICATION NUMBER SINCE IT CHANGES WITH EACH |
| | AMENDMENT. |
| | |
| | 2.) PLEASE CORRECT THE PROVIDED INTERIOR SETBACK TO 35' |
| | IN THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS TABLE (IT IS NOT 36' AS |
| | SPECIFIED IN THE TABLE). |
| | |
| | 3.) SINCE A SWIMMING POOL IS NO LONGER PART OF THE |
| | DESIGN, THE REFERENCES TO THE SWIMMING POOL AND |
| | SWIMMING POOL SETBACKS SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE |
| | PLAN. |
| | |
| | 4.) PLEASE WORK WITH RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE |
| | PLANNER, TO ADDRESS REQUIRED LANDSCAPING AND THE |
| | PLACEMENT OF THE TRANSFORMER WITHIN THE TERMINAL |
| | LANDSCAPE ISLAND. |
| | |
| | 5.) SETBACK DISTANCE FROM THE LIGHT POLE FIXTURES TO |
| | THE PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE SHOWN IN THE SITE PLAN (IN |
| | ADDITION TO THE SITE PLAN EXHIBIT (SHEET SPE-1)). |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT THE LIGHT POLE FIXTURES MUST BE |
| | SETBACK A MINIMUM OF 25 FT. FROM THE FRONT PROPERTY |
| | LINE; 5 FT. FROM THE SIDE AND REAR PROPERTY LINES. THE |
| | LIGHT FIXTURES DO NOT SEEM TO COMPLY WITH THE SETBACK |
| | REQUIREMENTS. AN ALTERNATIVE MAY BE TO PROVIDE LIGHTING |
| | ON THE BUILDING IF THE MINIMUM REQUIRED SETBACKS CANNOT |
| | BE MET. [ZLDR S.94-304(B)] |
| | |
| | 6.) A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHALL BE PROVIDED. THE |
| | PHOTOMETRIC PLAN MUST SHOW FOOT CANDLE SPILLOVER JUST |
| | BEYOND THE PROPERTY LINES AND ALSO INCLUDE THE SETBACK |
| | DISTANCE OF THE LIGHT FIXTURES FROM THE LIGHT POLE TO |
| | THE PROPERTY LINE. SETBACK DISTANCE SHALL COMPLY WITH |
| | THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDRS. |
| | |
| | 7.) THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING |
| | NOTE: ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE |
| | GLARE AND SHALL BE ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE |
| | AWAY FROM ALL ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT |
| | RESIDENCES, OR PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES. [ZLDR S.94-309(A)] |
| | |
| | 8.) PLEASE CONFIRM WITH VALERIO ORRICHIO, CITY |
| | TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER, TO DETERMINE THAT THE |
| | RELOCATION OF THE SECOND ON-STREET PARKING SPOT WILL |
| | NOT OBSTRUCT SIGHT VISIBILITY. THE SECOND ON STREET |
| | PARKING STALL WILL NEED TO BE RELOCATED IF IT OBSTRUCTS |
| | SIGHT VISIBILITY. |
| | |
| | 9.) WHAT IS THE HEIGHT OF THE PHASE II FENCE AND |
| | SECURITY GATE? THE HEIGHT SHALL BE NOTED IN THE PLANS |
| | TO DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENCY WITH THE ZONING AND LAND |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS). IS THERE A DETAIL? |
| | [ZLDR S.94-302] |
| | |
| | 10.) THE ARROW POINTING TO THE 4 FT. HIGH PANEL WALL |
| | SHALL POINT DIRECTLY TO THE PANEL WALL (NOT THE 10 FT. |
| | WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER. |
| | |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR |
| | (4) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 11 X 17 |
| | INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND |
| | DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | * ANY CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE |
| | ($60.00). |
| | |