Plan Review Details - Project Z21030022
Plan Review Stops For Project Z21030022
Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No 1 Status N Date 03-26-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By scwelter Date 03-26-2021 Time 13:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By scwelter Date 03-26-2021 Time 13:38 Sent To  
Notes
2021-03-26 13:54:20PROJECT EXEMPT FROM PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT - 501(C)3
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 04-08-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 04-07-2021 Time 19:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 04-07-2021 Time 19:34 Sent To  
Notes
2021-04-07 19:40:16DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. FLOOD ZONE. ACCORDING TO THE ADOPTED FLOOD INSURANCE
 RATE MAPS (FIRMS), THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS ARE ON A SITE
 THAT HAS SOME AREAS THAT ARE IN FLOOD ZONE AE, WITH A
 BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 14.8 FT NAVD FOR THE EASTERN
 PORTION OF THE SITE AND 11.0 FT NAVD FOR THE WESTERN
 PORTION OF THE SITE. THE FOOTPRINT OF THE PROPOSED
 BUILDINGS IS OUTSIDE OF THE FLOOD ZONE. IF ANY PORTION
 OF A BUILDING IS IN FACT IN A FLOOD ZONE, THE FIRST
 FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL ASSOCIATED MECHANICAL
 EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS ETC.) WILL HAVE TO BE
 24 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION.
  
 3. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 4. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE
 REQUIRED. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE
 AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT TIM LARGE, CHIEF PLUMBING
 INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561)
 805-6692, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 5. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 6. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
 WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
 HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
 OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
 CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 3 Status P Date 06-17-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 06-17-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 06-17-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-06-17 09:45:01PASSED WITH PROVISOS FOR ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL:
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD
 CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-822-2262
 [email protected]
  
 -THERE IS NOT MUCH INFORMATION ON THE TWO 400 SF
 RESTROOM BUILDINGS IN THE MIDDLE OF THE GOLF COURSE.
 PLEASE PROVIDE AT LEAST THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: 1)
 WILL THEY BE PERMANENT STRUCTURES? 2) HOW WILL WATER
 AND SEWER UTILITY FOR THEM BE TAKEN CARE OF?
 -IS THE EXISTING GRAVEL AND DIRT MAINTENANCE ROAD
 SUFFICIENT FOR THE VEHICLE TRAFFIC TO THE PROPOSED
 MAINTENANCE BUILDING? WILL IT ALSO BE OPEN ACCESS AT
 GREGORY RD WITH NO GATES/FENCES?
 -WILL THE MAINTENANCE BUILDING HAVE ANY FIRE
 SPRINKLERS? IS ANY OTHER FIRE PROTECTION WATER SUCH AS
 FIRE HYDRANTS NEEDED AROUND THAT AREA OF THE PROPERTY?
  
 RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT
 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 MOBILE: (561) 246-9525
 FAX: (561) 494-1116
 EMAIL: [email protected]
 WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status P Date 05-09-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 05-09-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By mgonzale Date 05-09-2021 Time   Sent To I
Notes
2021-05-09 08:41:311. PLEASE SHOW CALCULATIONS ON PRELIMINARY PLANS OF
 EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER
 (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM AND PEAK. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PER
 FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER.
 2. PLEASE PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY AND
 STORM SEWER ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE (CCTV IS A
 CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL).
 3. PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD
 CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-822-2262
 [email protected]
  
 PLEASE RESPOND TO THE FOLLOW COMMENTS IN WRITING:
  
 -ABOVE-GROUND METER MAY HAVE LARGER FOOTPRINT THAN
 SHOWN ON THE CIVIL PLANS.
  
 -4 INCH PVC SEWER NOT RUNNING THROUGH GREASE
 INTERCEPTOR HAS GREASE LABEL.
  
 -FENCES APPEARS TO BE RUNNING OVER WATER SERVICES NEAR
 GEORGIA PROPERTY LINE. ENSURE THAT FENCES ARE
 ELIMINATED OR REROUTED SO METERS CAN BE ACCESSED AT ROW
 WITHOUT GOING THROUGH MAIN ENTRANCE, AND SO WATER
 SERVICES CAN BE MAINTAINED.
  
 -MH #5 HAS TWO INV LISTED. DOES IT NEED ONE FOR EACH
 PIPE?
  
 -IF WATER IS NEEDED FOR LIFT STATION MAINTENANCE, WHERE
 WILL IT COME FROM? WILL THE WATER SOURCE HAVE ADEQUATE
 BACKFLOW PROTECTION?
  
 -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL HAVE SEPARATE CIVIL
 PLAN SHEETS WITH WATER SERVICE STANDARD DETAILS THAT
 ARE USED. ENSURE THEY ARE THE NEWEST REVISION AND
 NUMBERS MATCH THE LABELS.
  
 -NEAR THE CLUBHOUSE THE FDC PIPES CROSS THE OTHER
 FIRELINE PIPING. CONSIDER NOT HAVING THEM CROSS.
  
 -AT NORTH SIDE OF OFFICE BUILDING THERE IS SOMETHING
 THAT LOOKS LIKE A BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY NEAR A DOOR. IS
 ACCESSIBILITY FINE?
  
 -METER SIZE WAS LEFT OFF THE ABOVE-GROUND METER. PLEASE
 ADD AT FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL.
  
 -PLEASE LOCATE THE PROPOSED 3 INCH METER SLIGHTLY WEST
 IN A SIMILAR FASHION TO THE ABOVE GROUND METER.
  
 -3 INCH METER SHOULD BE ABOVE GROUND DESIGN.
  
 -3 INCH METER MAY HAVE LARGER FOOTPRINT THAN
 REPRESENTED ON THE CIVIL PLANS.
  
 -POLY CANNOT BE USED UPSTREAM OF 3 INCH METER. IT
 SHOULD ALSO HAVE 4 INCH TAP AND PIPING PER STANDARD
 DETAILS.
  
 -PLEASE LABEL PROPERTY LINES ON WATER PLANS.
  
 -ONE OF THE METERS AT MADDOCK AND PARKER INTERSECTION
 IS WPB UTILITY?S AND MAY NOT BE USED. THE OTHER DOES
 NOT CURRENTLY HAVE METER INSTALLED OR AN ACTIVE USAGE
 ACCOUNT. APPLICANT WOULD HAVE TO SETUP ACCOUNT AND MEET
 REQUIREMENTS OF CITY WPB UTILITY BILLING.
  
 -PLANS DO NOT SHOW WHERE WATER COMES FROM FOR THE
 MAINTENANCE BUILDING OR WHERE THE SEWAGE GOES. NEEDS TO
 BE DETERMINED AND FURTHER REQUIREMENTS MAY BE NEEDED
 BASED ON FINDINGS.
  
 -GUY WIRE ANCHOR SHOWS SLIGHTLY ENCROACHING ON CART
 PATH ON LANDSCAPE PLAN NEAR MADDOCK AND PARKER.
  
 -ENSURE PROTECTIVE NETTING POSTS DO NOT CONFLICT WITH
 SEWER PIPE OR DRAINAGE/STORMWATER PIPE.
  
 -SHOW WHERE 60 INCH DRAINAGE GOES ON LANDSCAPE PLANS AT
 THE WEST SIDE OF MARY BRANDON PARK.
  
 -LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS TRANSFORMER AND EMERGENCY
 GENERATOR NEAR CLUBHOUSE GREASE TRAP. PLEASE SHOW
 TRANSFORMER AND GENERATOR ON SEWER PLAN ALONG WITH ANY
 CONCRETE PADS THEY HAVE.
  
 -PLEASE ADD SEPARATE WATER PLAN SHEET SHOWING WATER
 UTILITIES SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF GREGORY AND
 GEORGIA AVE.
  
 -SITE PLAN SHOWS FPL UTILITY EASEMENT NEAR THE SOUTHERN
 WATER METERS. PLEASE SHOW THAT EASEMENT ON WATER PLAN
 AND VERIFY ANY GUY WIRES DO NOT CONFLICT WITH WATER
 UTILITIES.
  
 -ELEVATION NOT SHOWN NEAR 8? DCDA?S. PLEASE ENSURE
 THOSE AREAS ARE NOT LOW SPOTS OR DEPRESSIONS.
  
  
 RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT
 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 MOBILE: (561) 246-9525
 FAX: (561) 494-1116
 EMAIL: [email protected]
 WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-02-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 04-02-2021 Time   Rev Time  
Received By rrossano Date 04-02-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-04-02 08:03:201. PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC
 RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF
 YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
 MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
 IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
 [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER
 ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION
 ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD
 SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.
 2. AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
 MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI
 CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL
 3. PLEASE SUBMIT PRELIMINARY UTILITY ENGINEERING PLANS.
 PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF
 ALL WATER, STORM WATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES,
 INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND
 SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES,
 METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE
 SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING
 GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS,
 ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL
 INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER
 LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN
 VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
 ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER
 OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &
 TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL
 UTILITY CROSSINGS. CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE,
 AND REMOVE ANY ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2
 INCHES FROM CITY RIGHT OF WAY.
 4. PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE
 DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB
 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION).
 5. SHOW PROPOSED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE PER CURRENT CITY OF
 WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-7.
 6. CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY
 SEWER ARE REQUIRED.
 7. PLEASE CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA
 AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA.
 8. PLEASE CLEARLY LABEL UTILITIES AS EXISTING OR
 PROPOSED.
 9. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM
 AND PEAK) AND IRRIGATION AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS.
 CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER
 FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER.
 10. IS THERE A PROPOSED SANITARY CONNECTION? IF SO
 PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY AND STORM SEWER
 ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE.
 11. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS.
 12. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION OF WATER
 METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION.
 13. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES
 OF WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
 14. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING
 APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT
 SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING
 SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED
 LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
 15. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL CLEARLY SHOW ROAD
 RIGHT OF WAY.
 16. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY MAINS
 ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY
 LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT
 PARCELS.
 18. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER MAINS
 ARE BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL
 ADDRESSES.
 19. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO
 PROVIDE 50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH
 SIDE OF PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY
 AREAS PER CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-9.
 20. PLEASE USE CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAILS, CONTACT
 [email protected] FOR CAD FILE VERSIONS TO USE.
 21. PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD
 CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-822-2262
 [email protected]
  
 PLEASE RESPOND TO THE FOLLOW COMMENTS IN WRITING:
  
 -WATER METERS AND ASSOCIATED BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES NEED
 TO BE LOCATED ADJACENT THE PROPERTY LINE. THEY MUST NOT
 BE LOCATED IN ANY SIDEWALKS AND NEED TO HAVE OPEN
 ACCESS FROM THE ROW. DOMESTIC WATER METERS 3 INCH OR
 LARGER MUST BE ABOVE-GROUND.
  
 -WILL THE SIDEWALK NEAR THE GEORGIA AVE ENTRANCE DEAD
 END INTO THE GRASS?
  
 -USE DUCTILE IRON PIPE INSTEAD OF PVC FOR LARGE POTABLE
 WATER SERVICES/MAINS.
  
 -THERE WAS A BARBED WIRE FENCE NEAR THE PROPERTY LINE
 RUNNING DOWN GEORGIA AVE ? WILL IT REMAIN?
  
 -PLEASE ADD ADDRESS TO PROPERTIES ON EAST SIDE OF
 GEORGIA AVE NEAR THE PROPOSED 8 INCH WM RELOCATE ON
 WATER PLAN.
  
 -WHY DO THE 8 INCH AND 16 INCH WATER MAINS ON GEORGIA
 AVE NEED TO BE REROUTED?
  
 -DO NOT LOCATE WATER MAIN VALVES IN A DRIVEWAY OR
 DRIVEWAY APPROACH.
  
 -WATER PLAN DID NOT SHOW THE AREAS OF THE PERFORMANCE
 CENTER, MAINTENANCE BUILDING, PARKER AVE ROUNDABOUT, OR
 SOUTHEAST AREA NEAR GEORGIA/GREGORY INTERSECTION.
 PLEASE ADD ADDITIONAL PLAN SHEET SHOWING THOSE AREAS
 AND ANY EXISTING UTILITIES THERE.
  
 -WILL SEPARATE METERED WATER SERVICES BE NEEDED FOR THE
 PERFORMANCE CENTER, MAINTENANCE BUILDING, OR BATHROOM
 NEAR THE MAINTENANCE BUILDING?
  
 -WILL A SEPARATE METERED WATER SERVICE BE NEEDED FOR
 IRRIGATION?
  
 -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL: ADD WATER DEMAND
 CALCULATIONS ON WATER PLAN, ADD SHEET WITH ASSOCIATED
 WPB WATER SERVICE STANDARD DETAILS.
  
 -PLEASE ADD VISUAL SCALE ICON AND SITE ADDRESS TO CIVIL
 PLAN SHEETS.
  
 -THERE IS AN EXISTING DRIVEWAY APPROACH ON MADDOCK ST
 AROUND 60 FEET EAST OF PARKER AVE. WILL IT BE USED FOR
 THE GOLF PARK?
  
 -DID NOT SEE A DEMOLITION PLAN. IS THERE ANY DEMOLITION
 BEING PROPOSED?
  
 -CONSIDER PARALLEL/DUAL BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES FOR
 DOMESTIC WATER SERVICES TO REDUCE DOWNTIME DURING
 BACKFLOW MAINTENANCE.
  
  
 RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT
 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 MOBILE: (561) 246-9525
 FAX: (561) 494-1116
 EMAIL: [email protected]
 WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 3 Status P Date 06-15-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 06-15-2021 Time 16:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 06-15-2021 Time 16:43 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 06-03-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 06-03-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 06-03-2021 Time 14:24 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-01-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 04-01-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 04-01-2021 Time 16:04 Sent To  
Notes
2021-04-01 16:14:18THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE INTENDED
 TO PROVIDE GUIDANCE FOR BUILDING PLAN SUBMITTAL.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE
 OCCUPANCY TYPE, PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE.
  
 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE
 LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER
 SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED.
  
 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 THE PROPOSED LOCATIONS OF THE FIRE HYDRANT AND FDC ARE
 ACCEPTABLE FOR THE CLUBHOUSE WITH ANY CHANGES CLOSELY
 COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 WATER SUPPLIES COULD NOT BE LOCATED FOR THE PERFOMANCE
 CENTER NO THE MAINTAINENCE BUILDING.
  
 PLEASE REVIEW AND PROVIDE DETAILS.
  
 9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER
 THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY
 ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM,
 ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FS 61G AND
 SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PERMIT.
  
 9A) THE LOCATION OF ANY APPLICABLE DDCV AND FIRE LINE
 LOCATIONS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND
 SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL,
 THE CITY'S ENGINEERS OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND
 THE CITY'S PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE.
  
 THERE IS AN INDICATION OF A FDC; HOWEVER, IT IS ON THE
 WRONG SIDE OF THE DDCV. THOUGH IT IS NOTED ON BEING
 INFORMATIONAL, IT SHOULD BE ADJUSTED.
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
 EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
 PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
 SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE
 SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY
 GATES AND BUILDING DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR
 EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 07-12-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By aburnett Date 07-12-2021 Time 13:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aburnett Date 07-12-2021 Time 13:55 Sent To  
Notes
2021-07-12 14:00:04FROM: ANDREW BURNETT, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1562
 PROJECT: WPB GOLF COURSE Z21030022
 JULY 12, 2021
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. THE INTERNAL GOLF COURSE AREAS ASSOCIATED
 WITH THE TEES, GREENS AND FAIRWAYS AND ANY ASSOCIATED
 FEATURES ARE EXEMPT FROM THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS,
 BUT THE CITY LANDSCAPE POLICY STILL APPLIES. NOTE THAT
 A LANDSCAPE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THE GOLF COURSE
 AREAS TO RECORD THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 2. SATISFIED. INDICATE WHEN THE TREE INVENTORY AND
 DISPOSITION PLAN WILL BE PROVIDED.
  
 3. SATISFIED. EXPLAIN THE LACK OF THE 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE
 BUFFER ON THE WEST PROPERTY LINE AND SOUTH PROPERTY
 LINE.
  
 4. SATISFIED. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN
 OPTIONS CHART TO THE CURRENT CODE.
  
 5. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A
 MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO
 BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING
 AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE
 PERCENTAGE OF CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR THE
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS AS REQUIRED BY SECTION
 94-443(C)(3) FOR DIVIDER ISLANDS, TERMINAL, AND
 INTERIOR ISLANDS.
  
 TABEBUIA HETEROPHYLLA IS A CATEGORY 2 TREE, SO TOTAL
 CANNOT BE 100%. REVISE.
  
 6. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE PLAN SHOWING THE
 PARKING LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH
 SECTION 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS.
 A SEPARATE EXHIBIT MUST BE PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE THE
 AREAS COUNTED FOR THE CLUBHOUSE PARKING AREA AND THE
 MAINTENANCE FACILITY PARKING AREA.
  
 PROVIDE THE TOTAL LANDSCAPE ARE AREA REQUIRED BY ADDING
 THE TWO AMOUNTS.
 MAINTENANCE BUILDING VEHICULAR USE AREA IS 48,059,
 REQUIRING 1,922 SQ FT OF LANDSCAPE AREA. REVISE.
  
 7. SATISFIED. REMOVE THE REFERENCE TO THE 1 SHADE OR
 FLOWERING TREE PER 100 SQ FT OF REQ. LANDSCAPE AREA, AS
 THIS WAS REMOVED FROM THE CODE.
  
 8. SATISFIED. BUFFER LENGTHS REQUIRE ONE TREE PER 30
 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR EACH BUFFER LENGTH. EAST
 25? BUFFER ADJACENT TO GEORGIA AVE. REQUIRES 68 TREES.
  
 9. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE 30 PERCENT FOUNDATION
 PLANTING CALCULATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR EACH
 BUILDING.
  
  
  
 10. SATISFIED. ADD A SECTION IN THE LANDSCAPE DATA
 CHART TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A
 MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE
 FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED
 FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST
 RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT
 DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE
 THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT
 PLANTS BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST.
  
  
 11. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING
 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND REDESIGN THE LOCATIONS OF THE
 LIGHTING ON SHORTER POLES TO RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH
 TREES IN THE PARKING AREA LANDSCAPE ISLANDS.
 CONFLICTS STILL EXIST WITH LIGHT POLES AND TREES.
 REVISE.
 7/12/21 LIGHTING ADJUSTMENTS HAD BEEN DISCUSSED AND
 MADE PER EMAIL WITH ANDREW
  
 12. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 VALVES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 13. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL SEWER, WATER AND DRAINAGE LINES
 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH
 LANDSCAPING.
  
 14. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH
 LANDSCAPING.
  
 15. SATISFIED. MINIMUM TREE SIZES ARE 12 FEET HEIGHT,
 CORRECT ON PLANT LIST. LIGUSTRUM NEEDS TO MEET THIS
 HEIGHT OR SUBSTITUTE ANOTHER SPECIES IF TO BE COUNTED
 TOWARD BUFFER TREE REQUIREMENT.
  
 16. SATISFIED. ALL PROHIBITED INVASIVE EXOTIC SPECIES
 SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE ENTIRE SITE PRIOR TO THE
 ISSUANCE OF ANY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OR COMPLETION.
 THIS IS ALSO REQUIRED BY THE CITY LANDSCAPE POLICY.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 05-20-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 05-20-2021 Time 17:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 05-20-2021 Time 17:17 Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-20 17:18:27FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: WPB GOLF COURSE Z21030022
 MAY 20, 2021
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. THE INTERNAL GOLF COURSE AREAS ASSOCIATED
 WITH THE TEES, GREENS AND FAIRWAYS AND ANY ASSOCIATED
 FEATURES ARE EXEMPT FROM THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS,
 BUT THE CITY LANDSCAPE POLICY STILL APPLIES. NOTE THAT
 A LANDSCAPE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THE GOLF COURSE
 AREAS TO RECORD THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 2. SATISFIED. INDICATE WHEN THE TREE INVENTORY AND
 DISPOSITION PLAN WILL BE PROVIDED.
  
 3. SATISFIED. EXPLAIN THE LACK OF THE 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE
 BUFFER ON THE WEST PROPERTY LINE AND SOUTH PROPERTY
 LINE.
  
 4. SATISFIED. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN
 OPTIONS CHART TO THE CURRENT CODE.
  
 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES
 THAT A MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE
 REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF
 STREET PARKING AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES.
 SHOW THE PERCENTAGE OF CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR
 THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS AS REQUIRED BY SECTION
 94-443(C)(3) FOR DIVIDER ISLANDS, TERMINAL, AND
 INTERIOR ISLANDS.
  
 TABEBUIA HETEROPHYLLA IS A CATEGORY 2 TREE, SO TOTAL
 CANNOT BE 100%. REVISE.
  
 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE PLAN SHOWING
 THE PARKING LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE
 WITH SECTION 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) AND PROVIDE
 CALCULATIONS. A SEPARATE EXHIBIT MUST BE PROVIDED TO
 DEMONSTRATE THE AREAS COUNTED FOR THE CLUBHOUSE PARKING
 AREA AND THE MAINTENANCE FACILITY PARKING AREA.
  
 PROVIDE THE TOTAL LANDSCAPE ARE AREA REQUIRED BY ADDING
 THE TWO AMOUNTS.
 MAINTENANCE BUILDING VEHICULAR USE AREA IS 48,059,
 REQUIRING 1,922 SQ FT OF LANDSCAPE AREA. REVISE.
  
 7. SATISFIED. REMOVE THE REFERENCE TO THE 1 SHADE OR
 FLOWERING TREE PER 100 SQ FT OF REQ. LANDSCAPE AREA, AS
 THIS WAS REMOVED FROM THE CODE.
  
 8. SATISFIED. BUFFER LENGTHS REQUIRE ONE TREE PER 30
 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR EACH BUFFER LENGTH. EAST
 25? BUFFER ADJACENT TO GEORGIA AVE. REQUIRES 68 TREES.
  
 9. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE 30 PERCENT FOUNDATION
 PLANTING CALCULATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR EACH
 BUILDING.
  
  
  
 10. SATISFIED. ADD A SECTION IN THE LANDSCAPE DATA
 CHART TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A
 MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE
 FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED
 FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST
 RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT
 DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE
 THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT
 PLANTS BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST.
  
  
 11. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE
 LIGHTING ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND REDESIGN THE
 LOCATIONS OF THE LIGHTING ON SHORTER POLES TO RESOLVE
 ANY CONFLICTS WITH TREES IN THE PARKING AREA LANDSCAPE
 ISLANDS.
 CONFLICTS STILL EXIST WITH LIGHT POLES AND TREES.
 REVISE.
  
 12. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 VALVES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 13. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL SEWER, WATER AND DRAINAGE LINES
 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH
 LANDSCAPING.
  
 14. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH
 LANDSCAPING.
  
 15. SATISFIED. MINIMUM TREE SIZES ARE 12 FEET HEIGHT,
 CORRECT ON PLANT LIST. LIGUSTRUM NEEDS TO MEET THIS
 HEIGHT OR SUBSTITUTE ANOTHER SPECIES IF TO BE COUNTED
 TOWARD BUFFER TREE REQUIREMENT.
  
 16. SATISFIED. ALL PROHIBITED INVASIVE EXOTIC SPECIES
 SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE ENTIRE SITE PRIOR TO THE
 ISSUANCE OF ANY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OR COMPLETION.
 THIS IS ALSO REQUIRED BY THE CITY LANDSCAPE POLICY.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-06-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 04-06-2021 Time 11:52 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 04-06-2021 Time 11:52 Sent To  
Notes
2021-04-06 11:52:50FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: WPB GOLF COURSE Z21030022
 APRIL 6, 2021
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. THE INTERNAL GOLF COURSE AREAS ASSOCIATED WITH THE
 TEES, GREENS AND FAIRWAYS AND ANY ASSOCIATED FEATURES
 ARE EXEMPT FROM THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS, BUT THE
 CITY LANDSCAPE POLICY STILL APPLIES. NOTE THAT A
 LANDSCAPE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THE GOLF COURSE AREAS
 TO RECORD THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 2. INDICATE WHEN THE TREE INVENTORY AND DISPOSITION
 PLAN WILL BE PROVIDED.
  
 3. EXPLAIN THE LACK OF THE 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ON
 THE WEST PROPERTY LINE AND SOUTH PROPERTY LINE.
  
 4. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN OPTIONS CHART TO
 THE CURRENT CODE.
  
 5. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A MINIMUM OF 75
 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED
 WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING AREA SHALL
 BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE OF
 CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE
 AREAS AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 94-443(C)(3) FOR DIVIDER
 ISLANDS, TERMINAL, AND INTERIOR ISLANDS.
  
 6. PROVIDE A SEPARATE PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING
 LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS. A
 SEPARATE EXHIBIT MUST BE PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE THE
 AREAS COUNTED FOR THE CLUBHOUSE PARKING AREA AND THE
 MAINTENANCE FACILITY PARKING AREA.
  
 7. REMOVE THE REFERENCE TO THE 1 SHADE OR FLOWERING
 TREE PER 100 SQ FT OF REQ. LANDSCAPE AREA, AS THIS WAS
 REMOVED FROM THE CODE.
  
 8. BUFFER LENGTHS REQUIRE ONE TREE PER 30 FEET OR
 PORTION THEREOF FOR EACH BUFFER LENGTH. EAST 25? BUFFER
 ADJACENT TO GEORGIA AVE. REQUIRES 68 TREES.
  
 9. PROVIDE THE 30 PERCENT FOUNDATION PLANTING
 CALCULATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR EACH BUILDING.
  
  
  
 10. ADD A SECTION IN THE LANDSCAPE DATA CHART TO COMPLY
 WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60
 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE
 OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST
 OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF
 SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF
 NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS BASED ON FINAL PLANT
 LIST.
  
  
 11. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN AND REDESIGN THE LOCATIONS OF THE
 LIGHTING ON SHORTER POLES TO RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH
 TREES IN THE PARKING AREA LANDSCAPE ISLANDS.
  
 12. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED VALVES AND
 EQUIPMENT.
  
 13. SHOW ALL SEWER, WATER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLANS AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH
 LANDSCAPING.
  
 14. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
  
 15. MINIMUM TREE SIZES ARE 12 FEET HEIGHT, CORRECT ON
 PLANT LIST. LIGUSTRUM NEEDS TO MEET THIS HEIGHT OR
 SUBSTITUTE ANOTHER SPECIES IF TO BE COUNTED TOWARD
 BUFFER TREE REQUIREMENT.
  
 16. ALL PROHIBITED INVASIVE EXOTIC SPECIES SHALL BE
 REMOVED FROM THE ENTIRE SITE PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF
 ANY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OR COMPLETION. THIS IS
 ALSO REQUIRED BY THE CITY LANDSCAPE POLICY.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 2 Status P Date 05-07-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 05-07-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 05-07-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-07 15:22:20NO FURTHER COMMENTS.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-05-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 04-05-2021 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 04-05-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-04-05 11:44:45PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:
 1- REVSIED SITE DETAILS, SHEET SP-5, TO REFLECT THE
 LATEST REVISION OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. FOR A
 FREESTANDING SITE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, THE ENCLOSURE
 SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST REVISION OF CITY OF WEST
 PALM BEACH GENERAL CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE
 STANDARD, GC-7.
 2- AUTOTURN EXHIBIT (DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE TIRES
 PATH) FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER TRUCK
 WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECS:
 - DUAL AXLES
 - TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT
 - TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT
 - TURNING RADIUS:
 - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT
 - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT
 - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status P Date 06-10-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 06-10-2021 Time 09:49 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 06-10-2021 Time 14:40 Sent To  
Notes
2021-06-10 14:40:34THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 5/7/2021 SUBMITTAL:
  
  
 1. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] ADD SCALE BAR TO THE
 GOLFCOURSE AND CLUBHOUSE ENGINEERING PLANS TO
 FACILITATE REVIEWING PLANS ON THE COMPUTER. [ADDITONAL
 COMMENTS: ONLY A FEW OF THE GOLF COURSE GRADING PLANS
 HAD A SCALE BAR. MOST OF THE SHEETS LABEL THE SCALE AS
 1" = 30 FEET BUT THE SCALE BAR ON THE SHEET ARE AT
 50-FT INCREMENTS (THOUGH THEY MAY PLOT TO SCALE). TO
 AVOID CONFUSION BETWEEN THE SCALE BAR AND LISTED SCALE,
 THE SCALE BAR MAJOR INCREMENTS SHOULD BE WHAT IS LISTED
 AS THE PAGE SCALE.]
  
 2. [SATISFIED] UPDATE THE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE
 CLUBHOUSE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLANS TO SHOW WHAT IS
 SHOWN ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS.
  
 3. [SATISFIED] SHOW THE EXISTING 60-INCH DIAMETER STORM
 PIPE AND ANY OTHER EXISTING UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLANS.
  
 4. [SATISFIED] CONSIDER REDUCING THE LENGTH OF PARKING
 SPACES BY TWO FEET AND PROVIDE TWO FEET OF LANDSCAPED
 AREA OVERHANG.
  
 5. [SATISFIED] ADD ADDITIONAL SPOT GRADES, CONTOURS OR
 CROSS SECTIONS TO THE CLUBHOUSE PGD PLANS TO INDICATE
 HOW THE DEVELOPMENT WILL MEET EXISTING GRADES.
  
 6. [SATISFIED] CONFIRM THESE IS NOT AN OUTFALL PIPE FOR
 THE CLUBHOUSE DRAINAGE SYSTEM.
  
 7. [SATISFIED] CONSIDER COMBINING THE TWO INLETS AT THE
 CLUBHOUSE ENTRANCE AS ONE CATCH BASIN INLET IN THE
 LANDSCAPED MEDIAN WITH FLUMES TO GET THE STORMWATER
 RUNOFF INTO THE MEDIAN.
  
 8. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] DRAINAGE STRUCTURES UPSTREAM
 AND DOWNSTREAM OF EXFILTRATION TRENCHES SHOULD HAVE
 PRB?S TO PROLONG THE USEFUL LIFE OF THE EXFILTRATION
 TRENCHES. [ADDITIONAL COMMENT - CATCH BASIN AT GEORGIA
 AVE ENTRANCE WILL NEED A PRB. THIS CAN BE ADDRESSED
 WITH ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.]
  
 9. [SATISFIED] LABEL THE SOIL CONTAMINATION AREA ON
 SHEET GP-7.
  
 10. [NOT SATISFIED] SHOW AND LABEL THE SPOIL PILE
 EASEMENT, SFWMD C-51 SEDIMENT PROJECT EASEMENT AND
 SFWMD ACCESS EASEMENT ON SHEETS GP-7 AND GP-8.
 [ADDITONAL COMMENT: THIS CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH THE
 ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.]
  
 11. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] ENSURE THE IMPROVEMENTS AND
 GRADING WITHIN THE SFWMD EASEMENTS WILL NOT RESTRICT
 ACCESS TO THE EASEMENTS AND SPOIL PILE EASEMENT.
 [ADDITIONAL COMMENT - WILL NEED THE EASEMENTS SHOWN ON
 THE GRADING PLAN TO CONFIRM.]
  
 12. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE CONTROL
 STRUCTURE FOR THE PROPOSED LINED LAKE [ADDITIONAL
 COMMENT - PLANS DO NOT SHOW AN OUTFALL FROM THE LAKE TO
 THE C-51 CANAL.]
  
 13. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] WILL SUPPLEMENTAL WATER BE
 ADDED TO THE PROPOSED LINED LAKE DURING THE DRY SEASON
 TO MAINTAIN THE LITTORAL PLANTINGS? [ADDITIONAL COMMENT
 - RESPONSE LETTER FROM DEVELOPER'S APPLICANT INDICATED
 AN IRRIGATION LINE WILL BE DISCHARING INTO THE LINED
 LAKE. CHECK WITH SFWMD TO SEE IF THIS USE OF IRRIGATION
 WATER (WHETHER FROM A WELL OR OTHER SOURCE) WILL IMPACT
 THE ALLOWABLE WITHDRAWABLE FROM THE C-51 CANAL.]
  
 14. [NOT SATISFIED] ON SHEET ESC:[ADDITIONAL COMMENT: -
 THE FOLLOWING CAN BE INCLUDED WITH THE ENGINEERING
 PERMIT APPLICATION]
 A. SHOW PROTECTION OF THE CATCH BASIN IN THE EXISTING
 DRY DETENTION AREA IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE.
 B. SHOW FLOATING TURBIDITY BARRIER ON THE EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED OUTFALLS IN THE C-51 CANAL.
  
 15. [SATISFIED] THE GOLF COURSE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS
 SUMMARY PAGE LISTS THE 5-YR 1-DAY POST-DEVELOPMENT PEAK
 STAGE BUT THIS DESIGN STORM DOES NOT APPEAR IN THE
 ANALYSIS.
  
 NEW COMMENT:
  
 16. FOR SECTION A-A ON SHEET C2.0, SHOW A SWALE BEFORE
 THE PROPERTY LINE TO CAPTURE ANY STORMWATER RUNOFF AND
 TO PREVENT DIRECT RUNOFF ONTO THE ADJACENT PARCEL.
  
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-08-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 04-08-2021 Time 08:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 04-08-2021 Time 08:46 Sent To  
Notes
2021-04-08 08:46:16THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
  
 1. ADD SCALE BAR TO THE GOLFCOURSE AND CLUBHOUSE
 ENGINEERING PLANS TO FACILITATE REVIEWING PLANS ON THE
 COMPUTER.
  
 2. UPDATE THE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE CLUBHOUSE SITE
 PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLANS TO SHOW WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE
 ENGINEERING PLANS.
  
 3. SHOW THE EXISTING 60? STORM PIPE AND ANY OTHER
 EXISTING UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 4. CONSIDER REDUCING THE LENGTH OF PARKING SPACES BY
 TWO FEET AND PROVIDE TWO FEET OF LANDSCAPED AREA
 OVERHANG.
  
 5. ADD ADDITIONAL SPOT GRADES, CONTOURS OR CROSS
 SECTIONS TO THE CLUBHOUSE PGD PLANS TO INDICATE HOW THE
 DEVELOPMENT WILL MEET EXISTING GRADES.
  
 6. CONFIRM THESE IS NOT AN OUTFALL PIPE FOR THE
 CLUBHOUSE DRAINAGE SYSTEM.
  
 7. CONSIDER COMBINING THE TWO INLETS AT THE CLUBHOUSE
 ENTRANCE AS ONE CATCH BASIN INLET IN THE LANDSCAPED
 MEDIAN WITH FLUMES TO GET THE STORMWATER RUNOFF INTO
 THE MEDIAN.
  
 8. DRAINAGE STRUCTURES UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM OF
 EXFILTRATION TRENCHES SHOULD HAVE PRB?S TO PROLONG THE
 USEFUL LIFE OF THE EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.
  
 9. LABEL THE SOIL CONTAMINATION AREA ON SHEET GP-7.
  
 10. SHOW AND LABEL THE SPOIL PILE EASEMENT, SFWMD C-51
 SEDIMENT PROJECT EASEMENT AND SFWMD ACCESS EASEMENT ON
 SHEETS GP-7 AND GP-8.
  
 11. ENSURE THE IMPROVEMENTS AND GRADING WITHIN THE
 SFWMD EASEMENTS WILL NOT RESTRICT ACCESS TO THE
 EASEMENTS AND SPOIL PILE EASEMENT.
  
 12. PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE CONTROL STRUCTURE FOR THE
 PROPOSED LINED LAKE.
  
 13. WILL SUPPLEMENTAL WATER BE ADDED TO THE PROPOSED
 LINED LAKE DURING THE DRY SEASON TO MAINTAIN THE
 LITTORAL PLANTINGS?
  
 14. ON SHEET ESC:
 A. SHOW PROTECTION OF THE CATCH BASIN IN THE EXISTING
 DRY DETENTION AREA IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE.
 B. SHOW FLOATING TURBIDITY BARRIER ON THE EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED OUTFALLS IN THE C-51 CANAL.
  
 15. THE GOLF COURSE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS SUMMARY PAGE
 LISTS THE 5-YR 1-DAY POST-DEVELOPMENT PEAK STAGE BUT
 THIS DESIGN STORM DOES NOT APPEAR IN THE ANALYSIS.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
  
 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED
 WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 3. PROVIDE COPY OF MODIFIED SFWMD ERP PERMIT(S) BEFORE
 START OF CONSTRUCTION.
  
 4. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WITH THE
 ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. DRAINAGE SYSTEMS TO BE
 DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP CRITERIA.
  
 5. PERMIT WILL BE NEEDED FROM SFWMD TO WORK WITHIN THE
 C-51 CANAL R/W.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 06-25-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 06-25-2021 Time 08:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-06-25 08:53:34CONDITION OF APPROVAL TO REPLAT PRIOR TO C.O.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 05-14-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 05-14-2021 Time 08:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-14 09:03:391. ADD LEASE BOUNDARY/RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES TO ALL PLANS,
 ESPECIALLY ALONG PROPOSED SCHOOL LEASE AREA, PARKER
 AVE., GEORGIA AVE. AND MADDOCK.
 2. ADD 60" DRAINAGE LINE IN NE CORNER OF PRACTICE RANGE
 TO LANDSCAPE PLANS.
 3. SHOW EXISTING FPL EASEMENTS ALONG GEORGIA AVE. ON
 ALL PLANS.
 4. ANY IMPROVEMENTS/LANDSCAPING IN RIGHTS OF WAY WILL
 REQUIRE A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-07-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 04-07-2021 Time 10:44 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date 04-07-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-04-07 10:51:451. REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED. APPLICATION FOR MINOR
 SUBDIVISION IS THROUGH PLANNING & ZONING.
 2. CITY WILL RETAIN EASEMENTS FOR THE 60" STORMWATER IN
 NE CORNER; THE WATER MAIN ALONG THE C-51 AND THE
 RETENTION AREA IN THE SE CORNER.
 3. LAW DEPT. IS WORKING TO RESOLVE THE 15' GAP OFF OF
 GREGORY ROAD.
 4. ACCESS TO SPOIL AREA THROUGH MAINTENANCE AREA MUST
 BE MAINTAINED FOR FUTURE CANAL DREDGING.
 5. ADD CROSSWALK TO EXISTING SIDEWALK ON EAST SIDE OF
 GEORGIA.
 6. PUBLIC UTILITIES IS REVIEWING PROPOSED DEFLECTIONS
 OF WATER MAINS IN GEORGIA DUE TO PROPOSED SANITARY. HAS
 SOFT-DIGS BEEN PERFORMED FOR EXISTING CONFLICTS? IF SO,
 PROVIDE COPIES.
 7. IF SANITARY REMAINS AS IS, A MANHOLE AT R/W LINE
 WILL NEED TO BE ADDED AS POINT OF SERVICE.
 8. HAS PROPOSED LEASE AREA BEEN DISCUSSED WITH SCHOOL?
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 08-04-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 08-04-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-08-04 13:47:06NO FURTHER COMMENTS.
  
  
 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
 2) SATISFIED. PER COUNTY RECOMMENDATION, ANALYZE
 IMPLEMENTATION OF A RIGHT-RUN LANE FROM FOREST HILL
 BLVD TO GEORGIA AVE ALONG THE WEST APPROACH.
 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS SHOWCASING
 GARBAGE TRUCK AND SERVICE VEHICLES PATHS IN AND OUT OF
 THE FACILITY. LATEST SUBMISSION SHOWCASES ENCROACHMENT
 AT THE ACCESS DRIVEWAY. SECOND RESUBMISSION, SHEET
 X1.0, STILL SHOWS TRUCK RUNNING OVER THE MEDIAN ISLAND.
 NOTE: IT IS OK TO DEPICT THE TRUCK TAKING A WIDE TURN
 AND PARTIALLY DRIVING OVER THE OPPOSITE LANE IN ORDER
 TO CLEANLY ACCESS THE DRIVEWAY
 4) SATISFIED. IS THE PERFORMANCE CENTER PART OF THE
 DEVELOPMENT? IF SO, PLEASE INCLUDE ITS IMPACT IN THE
 TRAFFIC STUDY
 5) SATISFIED-DEFERRED. INSTALL PEDESTRIAN REFUGEE
 ISLAND AT THE ACCESS DRIVEWAY
 6) SATISFIED-DEFERRED. DRIVEWAY ENTRY AND EXIT LANE
 CAN?T BE MORE THAN 12 FEET WIDE. A PEDESTRIAN REFUGEE
 ISLAND SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED IN ORDER TO MITIGATE THE
 PROPOSED 20 FEET WIDE OUTBOUND LANE.
 7) SATISFIED. GIVEN THE WIDTH OF THE PROPOSED OUTBOUND
 LANE, IT IS RECOMMENDED TO SPLIT IT INTO TWO 10-FOOT
 LANES AND INSTALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS FOR LEFT-ONLY AND
 RIGHT-ONLY MOVEMENTS
 8) SATISFIED-DEFERRED. PROVIDE BICYCLE FACILITIES
 ACCORDING TO CITY MASTER PLAN
 O BIKE LANES/MULTIUSE PATH ALONG GEORGIA AVE/GREGORY RD
 O SHARROW ALONG MADDOCK ST
 O TRAIL THROUGH OR AROUND THE PROPOSED GOLF COURSE
 STARTING FROM GREGORY RD, ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE CANAL
 THEN HEADING NORTH PARALLEL TO I-95
 9) SATISFIED-DEFERRED. IF A SIDEWALK OR MULTIUSE PATH
 IS ESTABLISHED ON THE WEST SIDE OF GEORGIA AVE, EXTEND
 IT ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF GREGORY RD TO THE RR TRACKS
 AND PROVIDE A CROSSWALK TO CONNECT TO THE NORTH SIDE
 SIDEWALK
  
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 06-25-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 06-25-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-06-25 18:42:12 
 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
 2) SATISFIED. PER COUNTY RECOMMENDATION, ANALYZE
 IMPLEMENTATION OF A RIGHT-RUN LANE FROM FOREST HILL
 BLVD TO GEORGIA AVE ALONG THE WEST APPROACH.
 3) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS SHOWCASING
 GARBAGE TRUCK AND SERVICE VEHICLES PATHS IN AND OUT OF
 THE FACILITY. LATEST SUBMISSION SHOWCASES ENCROACHMENT
 AT THE ACCESS DRIVEWAY. SECOND RESUBMISSION, SHEET
 X1.0, STILL SHOWS TRUCK RUNNING OVER THE MEDIAN ISLAND.
 NOTE: IT IS OK TO DEPICT THE TRUCK TAKING A WIDE TURN
 AND PARTIALLY DRIVING OVER THE OPPOSITE LANE IN ORDER
 TO CLEANLY ACCESS THE DRIVEWAY
 4) SATISFIED. IS THE PERFORMANCE CENTER PART OF THE
 DEVELOPMENT? IF SO, PLEASE INCLUDE ITS IMPACT IN THE
 TRAFFIC STUDY
 5) SATISFIED-DEFERRED. INSTALL PEDESTRIAN REFUGEE
 ISLAND AT THE ACCESS DRIVEWAY
 6) SATISFIED-DEFERRED. DRIVEWAY ENTRY AND EXIT LANE
 CAN?T BE MORE THAN 12 FEET WIDE. A PEDESTRIAN REFUGEE
 ISLAND SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED IN ORDER TO MITIGATE THE
 PROPOSED 20 FEET WIDE OUTBOUND LANE.
 7) SATISFIED. GIVEN THE WIDTH OF THE PROPOSED OUTBOUND
 LANE, IT IS RECOMMENDED TO SPLIT IT INTO TWO 10-FOOT
 LANES AND INSTALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS FOR LEFT-ONLY AND
 RIGHT-ONLY MOVEMENTS
 8) SATISFIED-DEFERRED. PROVIDE BICYCLE FACILITIES
 ACCORDING TO CITY MASTER PLAN
 O BIKE LANES/MULTIUSE PATH ALONG GEORGIA AVE/GREGORY RD
 O SHARROW ALONG MADDOCK ST
 O TRAIL THROUGH OR AROUND THE PROPOSED GOLF COURSE
 STARTING FROM GREGORY RD, ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE CANAL
 THEN HEADING NORTH PARALLEL TO I-95
 9) SATISFIED-DEFERRED. IF A SIDEWALK OR MULTIUSE PATH
 IS ESTABLISHED ON THE WEST SIDE OF GEORGIA AVE, EXTEND
 IT ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF GREGORY RD TO THE RR TRACKS
 AND PROVIDE A CROSSWALK TO CONNECT TO THE NORTH SIDE
 SIDEWALK
  
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 05-07-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 05-07-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 05-06-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-07 11:26:14TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
 2) NOT SATISFIED. PER COUNTY RECOMMENDATION, ANALYZE
 IMPLEMENTATION OF A RIGHT-RUN LANE FROM FOREST HILL
 BLVD TO GEORGIA AVE ALONG THE WEST APPROACH.
 3) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS
 SHOWCASING GARBAGE TRUCK AND SERVICE VEHICLES PATHS IN
 AND OUT OF THE FACILITY. LATEST SUBMISSION SHOWCASES
 ENCROACHMENT AT THE ACCESS DRIVEWAY.
 4) NOT SATISFIED. IS THE PERFORMANCE CENTER PART OF THE
 DEVELOPMENT? IF SO, PLEASE INCLUDE ITS IMPACT IN THE
 TRAFFIC STUDY
  
 SITE COMMENTS
 5) NOT SATISFIED. INSTALL PEDESTRIAN REFUGEE ISLAND AT
 THE ACCESS DRIVEWAY
 6) NOT SATISFIED. DRIVEWAY ENTRY AND EXIT LANE CAN?T BE
 MORE THAN 12 FEET WIDE. A PEDESTRIAN REFUGEE ISLAND
 SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED IN ORDER TO MITIGATE THE PROPOSED
 20 FEET WIDE OUTBOUND LANE.
 7) NOT SATISFIED. GIVEN THE WIDTH OF THE PROPOSED
 OUTBOUND LANE, IT IS RECOMMENDED TO SPLIT IT INTO TWO
 10-FOOT LANES AND INSTALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS FOR
 LEFT-ONLY AND RIGHT-ONLY MOVEMENTS
 8) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE BICYCLE FACILITIES ACCORDING
 TO CITY MASTER PLAN
 O BIKE LANES/MULTIUSE PATH ALONG GEORGIA AVE/GREGORY RD
 O SHARROW ALONG MADDOCK ST
 O TRAIL THROUGH OR AROUND THE PROPOSED GOLF COURSE
 STARTING FROM GREGORY RD, ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE CANAL
 THEN HEADING NORTH PARALLEL TO I-95
 9) NOT SATISFIED. IF A SIDEWALK OR MULTIUSE PATH IS
 ESTABLISHED ON THE WEST SIDE OF GEORGIA AVE, EXTEND IT
 ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF GREGORY RD TO THE RR TRACKS AND
 PROVIDE A CROSSWALK TO CONNECT TO THE NORTH SIDE
 SIDEWALK
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-05-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 04-05-2021 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 04-05-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-04-08 11:33:13TRAFFIC SITE COMMENTS ARE MODIFIED BELOW PER
 ENGINEERING:
  
 COMMENTS # 3, 3A, 3B, 3C AND #6 ARE HEREBY DELETED.
  
  
2021-04-05 11:47:14 
 TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
 2) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS SHOWCASING GARBAGE TRUCK
 AND SERVICE VEHICLES PATHS IN AND OUT OF THE FACILITY
  
 SITE COMMENTS
 3) PROVIDE BICYCLE FACILITIES ACCORDING TO CITY MASTER
 PLAN
 3A. BIKE LANES/MULTIUSE PATH ALONG GEORGIA AVE/GREGORY
 RD
 3B. SHARROW ALONG MADDOCK ST
 3C. TRAIL THROUGH OR AROUND THE PROPOSED GOLF COURSE
 STARTING FROM GREGORY RD, ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE CANAL
 THEN HEADING NORTH PARALLEL TO I-95
 4) DRIVEWAY ENTRY AND EXIT LANE CAN?T BE MORE THAN 12
 FEET WIDE
 5) INSTALL PEDESTRIAN REFUGEE ISLAND AT THE DRIVEWAY
 6) IF A SIDEWALK OR MULTIUSE PATH IS ESTABLISHED ON THE
 WEST SIDE OF GEORGIA AVE, EXTEND IT ALONG THE SOUTH
 SIDE OF GREGORY RD TO THE RR TRACKS AND PROVIDE A
 CROSSWALK TO CONNECT TO THE NORTH SIDE SIDEWALK
 7) IS THE PERFORMANCE CENTER PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT?
 IF SO, PLEASE INCLUDE ITS IMPACT IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 07-29-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 07-29-2021 Time 10:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 07-29-2021 Time 10:43 Sent To  
Notes
2021-07-29 10:44:29PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 07.29.2021
 PROJECT NO.: Z21030022
 CASE NO.: FSPR 21-02
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. [ SATISFIED ] - ARE THERE ANY HISTORIC ELEMENTS FROM
 THE PREVIOUS GOLF COURSE/CLUBHOUSE THAT COULD BE
 INCORPORATED INTO THE NEW FACILITIES?
  
 1.1 [ SATISFIED ] - NUMEROUS ITEMS FROM THE OLD
 CLUBHOUSE/COURSE HAVE BEEN LOCATED. TOM FRANKEL HAS
 BEEN MADE AWARE AND IS TO BE COORDINATING A REVIEW,
 EVALUATION, ETC. NO COORDINATION HAS OCCURRED TO DATE.
  
 2. [ SATISFIED ] - THE NETTING, IF LOCATED WITHIN A
 SETBACK, SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM FENCE HEIGHT
 PROVIDED IN SEC. 94-302.C.1. IF LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE
 SETBACK, THE NETTING/POLES SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM
 HEIGHT PERMITTED WITHIN THE ZONING DISTRICT, AS
 PROVIDED IN SEC. 94-204.5.
  
 2.1 [ SATISFIED ] - VARIANCE IN-PROCESS (ZBA CASE NO.
 3394).
  
 3. [ SATISFIED ] - PHOTOMETRIC PLANS SHALL BE PROVIDED
 AND SHALL INDICATE COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. 94-309.A., AS
 ALSO REQUIRED BY SEC. 94-273.D.60.B.4. ALL OUTDOOR
 LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE GLARE AND SHALL BE
 ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE AWAY FROM ALL
 ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT RESIDENCES, OR
 PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES.
  
 3.1 [ SATISFIED ] - ON THE PHOTOMETRIC PLANS FOR THE
 DRIVING RANGE / PAR 3 COURSE, PLEASE PROVIDE THE
 PHOTOMETRIC LEVELS AT THE PROPERTY LINE TO SHOW THE
 IMPACT OF THE SHIELDING, ETC. LEVELS SHOULD NOT EXCEED
 0.5 FOOTCANDLES WHEN MEASURED ON THE PROPERTY ADJACENT
 TO A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD.
  
 3.1.1 [ SATISFIED ] - THERE IS ONE AREA WHERE THE
 LEVELS ARE 0.6 FOOTCANDLES.
  
 4. [ SATISFIED ] - FENCES/WALLS PROPOSED WITHIN THE
 FRONT SETBACK SHALL NOT EXCEED FOUR (4) FEET IN HEIGHT.
 FENCES/WALL LOCATED WITHIN OTHER SETBACKS SHALL NOT
 EXCEED SIX (6) FEET IN HEIGHT.
  
 4.1 [ SATISFIED ] - VARIANCE IN-PROCESS (ZBA CASE NO.
 3394).
  
 5. [ SATISFIED ] - ENSURE THAT THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS
 BETWEEN THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING AND FENCING WITH THE
 EXISTING 60 INCH DRAINAGE PIPE IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER
 OF THE SITE. ANY IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED WITHIN THE
 REQUIRED EASEMENT WILL NEED TO BE APPROVED BY THE
 EASEMENT HOLDER.
  
 5.1 [ SATISFIED ] - NEW FENCING IS BEING PROPOSED TO BE
 INSTALLED AT THE SOUTHEAST END OF THE EASEMENT
 (ADJACENT TO GEORGIA AVENUE). CONSENT FROM THE CITY'S
 PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT WILL BE REQUIRED.
  
 6. [ SATISFIED ] - THE ENGINEERING PLANS SHOW CURBING
 GOING ACROSS THE FRONT OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE.
  
 7. [ SATISFIED ] - WHAT IS THE REASONING FOR EXTENDING
 THE ASPHALT PARKING LOT ALL THE WAY TO THE NORTHEAST
 CORNER OF THE OFFICE BUILDING? IS THIS A
 LOADING/UNLOADING AREA? IS THERE GOING TO BE STORAGE?
 DEPENDING UPON THE RESPONSE, SCREENING MAY BE REQUIRED.
 ADDITIONALLY, A TURNAROUND PARKING SPACE NEEDS TO BE
 PROVIDED AS THIS IS A DEAD-END ROW OF PARKING.
  
 8. [ SATISFIED ] - WITH UNDERSTANDING THAT THE
 APPLICANT WILL CONTINUE TO WORK WITH THE CITY ON
 PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY ALONG GEORGIA AVENUE ] - A
 SIDEWALK SHALL BE PROVIDED ON GEORGIA AVENUE CONNECTING
 THE SITE TO THE EXISTING SIDEWALK NETWORK.
  
 9. [ SATISFIED ] - AN INCREASED AND ENHANCED BUFFER
 NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED ALONG MADDOCK STREET AND GEORGIA
 AVENUE (INCREASE LANDSCAPING, NEW FENCING, ETC.). THIS
 WILL BE A PART OF FURTHER DISCUSSION WITH STAFF.
  
 10. [ SATISFIED ] - DETAILS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL
 SCREEN WALLS AND GATES AROUND THE LOADING/TRASH SERVICE
 AREA, ETC. ARE THESE SCREEN WALLS ABOVE GRADE? ARE THEY
 RETAINING WALLS? BOTH?
  
 10.1 [ SATISFIED ] - WHILE YOUR NARRATIVE DESCRIBES
 THIS AREA, A DETAIL OR CROSS-SECTION SHOULD BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 11. [ SATISFIED ] - IT IS SUGGESTED THAT PARKING SPACES
 ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPING BE MADE 16 FEET IN LENGTH WITH
 THE USE OF A CURB (NO WHEEL STOP) AND THAT THE
 LANDSCAPE AREA BE INCREASED IN SIZE TO ACCOMMODATE THE
 OVERHANG.
  
 11.1 [ SATISFIED ] - THERE APPEAR TO BE A FEW
 ADDITIONAL SPACES WHERE THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND CAN BE
 ENLARGED TO ALLOW THE OVERHANG. PLEASE CONTACT ME FOR
 SPECIFIC LOCATIONS.
  
 12. [ SATISFIED ] - NEED TO SHOW LOCATIONS FOR BIKE
 RACKS AND THE DATA TABLE NEEDS TO BE UPDATED TO SHOW
 COMPLIANCE WITH THE QUANTITY OF BIKE RACKS. BIKE RACKS
 SHOULD BE DISTRIBUTED AMONGST THE VARIOUS BUILDINGS
 (OFFICE, CLUBHOUSE, MAINTENANCE, ETC.).
  
 12.1 [ SATISFIED ] - THE NUMBER OF SPACES IN THE TABLE
 DO NOT APPEAR TO MATCH WHAT IS DRAWN ON THE SITE PLAN.
 ACCORDING TO THE SITE PLAN, THERE ARE FOUR (4) SPACES
 AT THE MAINTENANCE FACILITY, NOT TWO (2), THEREBY
 RESULTING IN 16 TOTAL BICYCLE SPACES. THE TABLE AND THE
 LABEL ON THE BICYCLE SPACES AT THE MAINTENANCE FACILITY
 NEED TO BE CORRECTED ACCORDINGLY.
  
 13. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - PLANS NEED TO SHOW THE
 LOCATIONS FOR ALL STOP BARS, CROSSWALKS, ETC.
  
 13.1 [ NOT SATISFIED ] - A STOP BAR IS MISSING
 SOUTHEAST OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. ADDITIONALLY, A
 STOP BAR WOULD EITHER NEED TO BE PROVIDED AT THE DRIVE
 AISLE TO THE SOUTHWEST OF THE DUMPSTER, OR THE ONE
 IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF THE DUMPSTER.
  
 13.1.1 [ NOT SATISFIED ] - THE PAVEMENT MARKINGS ON THE
 SITE PLAN DO NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE CIVIL
 PLANS.
  
 14. [ SATISFIED ] - IT APPEARS THAT THERE IS A PARKING
 SPACE IN FRONT OF THE OFFICE BUILDING DUMPSTER THAT
 WOULD CONFLICT WITH THE GATES ON THE ENCLOSURE.
  
 15. [ SATISFIED ] - IS PUBLIC WORKS GOING TO BE
 ACCEPTABLE OF THE LOCATION OF THE DUMPSTER BY THE
 OFFICE BUILDING? THIS SEEMS TO BE A LOT OF BACK-OUT
 REQUIRED. PLEASE OBTAIN CONFIRMATION.
  
 16. [ SATISFIED - SUBJECT TO CONDITION OF APPROVAL ] -
 IMPROVEMENTS AT THE MAINTENANCE FACILITY ARE SHOWN IN
 THE ACCESS EASEMENT. EITHER THE IMPROVEMENTS NEED TO BE
 MOVED TO OUTSIDE THE EASEMENT, OR CONSENT FROM THE
 EASEMENT HOLDER SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 17. [ SATISFIED ] - DETAILS FOR CHAIN LINK FENCING
 SHALL BE PROVIDED (HEIGHT, ETC.) AND SHALL COMPLY WITH
 MAXIMUM FENCE HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS.
  
 18. [ SATISFIED ] - WITH UNDERSTANDING THAT BUILDING
 DIVISION HAS INDICATED NO ROUTE IS REQUIRED ] - DOES
 THE MAINTENANCE FACILITY NEED AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM
 THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY? PLEASE CONFIRM.
  
 19. [ SATISFIED ] - SYMBOLOGY APPEARS TO BE MISSING
 FROM THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE AT THE MAINTENANCE
 FACILITY.
  
 20. [ SATISFIED ] - WHAT IS THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM
 THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE TO THE ACCESSIBLE BUILDING
 ENTRANCE?
  
 21. [ SATISFIED ] - DETAILS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE
 SCREENING PROPOSED AROUND THE STORAGE BINS.
  
 22. [ SATISFIED ] - THE DIMENSIONS OF THE DUMPSTER AT
 THE MAINTENANCE FACILITY DO NOT SEEM TO MATCH THAT
 SHOWN FOR THE DUMPSTER DETAIL. A SEPARATE DETAIL MAY
 NEED TO BE PROVIDED.
  
 22.1 [ SATISFIED ] - IS THE MAINTENACE FACILITY
 DUMPSTER TO BE PICKED UP BY A PRIVATE PROVIDER? PLEASE
 CLARIFY.
  
 23. [ SATISFIED ] - COVERED OUTDOOR STORAGE AT THE
 MAINTENANCE FACILITY NEEDS TO BE SCREENED IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH SEC. 94-315.B.1. WHAT IS PROPOSED TO BE STORED IN
 THIS AREA?
  
 24. [ SATISFIED ] - PLEASE NOTE THAT THE DEDICATION OF
 ANY RIGHT-OF-WAY WILL CHANGE THE PROPERTY LINE AND
 THEREBY CHANGE THE MEASUREMENT OF ANY SETBACKS, ETC.
  
 24.1 [ SATISIFIED ] - YOUR NARRATIVE INDICATES THAT NO
 RIGHT-OF-WAY IS BEING DEDICATED AS PART OF THIS
 PROJECT...HAS IT BEEN CONFIRMED THAT NO RIGHT-OF-WAY
 WILL BE DEDICATED TO ACCOMMODATE THE EXISTING
 ROUNDABOUT AT THE SOUTHER TERMINUS OF PARKER AVENUE?
  
 25. [ SATISFIED ] - THE SIDEWALK THAT LEAVES THE
 TERRACE ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE CLUBHOUSE, WHERE
 IS IT GOING TO? WHAT IS IS CONNECTING TO?
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL REVISED PLANS AND/OR
 DOCUMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 07-12-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 07-12-2021 Time 10:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 07-12-2021 Time 10:23 Sent To  
Notes
2021-07-12 10:45:14PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 07.12.2021
 PROJECT NO.: Z21030022
 CASE NO.: FSPR 21-02
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. [ SATISFIED ] - ARE THERE ANY HISTORIC ELEMENTS FROM
 THE PREVIOUS GOLF COURSE/CLUBHOUSE THAT COULD BE
 INCORPORATED INTO THE NEW FACILITIES?
  
 1.1 [ SATISFIED ] - NUMEROUS ITEMS FROM THE OLD
 CLUBHOUSE/COURSE HAVE BEEN LOCATED. TOM FRANKEL HAS
 BEEN MADE AWARE AND IS TO BE COORDINATING A REVIEW,
 EVALUATION, ETC. NO COORDINATION HAS OCCURRED TO DATE.
  
 2. [ SATISFIED ] - THE NETTING, IF LOCATED WITHIN A
 SETBACK, SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM FENCE HEIGHT
 PROVIDED IN SEC. 94-302.C.1. IF LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE
 SETBACK, THE NETTING/POLES SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM
 HEIGHT PERMITTED WITHIN THE ZONING DISTRICT, AS
 PROVIDED IN SEC. 94-204.5.
  
 2.1 [ SATISFIED ] - VARIANCE IN-PROCESS (ZBA CASE NO.
 3394).
  
 3. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - PHOTOMETRIC PLANS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED AND SHALL INDICATE COMPLIANCE WITH SEC.
 94-309.A., AS ALSO REQUIRED BY SEC. 94-273.D.60.B.4.
 ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE GLARE
 AND SHALL BE ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE AWAY
 FROM ALL ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT
 RESIDENCES, OR PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES.
  
 3.1 [ NOT SATISFIED ] - ON THE PHOTOMETRIC PLANS FOR
 THE DRIVING RANGE / PAR 3 COURSE, PLEASE PROVIDE THE
 PHOTOMETRIC LEVELS AT THE PROPERTY LINE TO SHOW THE
 IMPACT OF THE SHIELDING, ETC. LEVELS SHOULD NOT EXCEED
 0.5 FOOTCANDLES WHEN MEASURED ON THE PROPERTY ADJACENT
 TO A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD.
  
 3.1.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - THERE IS ONE AREA WHERE THE
 LEVELS ARE 0.6 FOOTCANDLES.
  
 4. [ SATISFIED ] - FENCES/WALLS PROPOSED WITHIN THE
 FRONT SETBACK SHALL NOT EXCEED FOUR (4) FEET IN HEIGHT.
 FENCES/WALL LOCATED WITHIN OTHER SETBACKS SHALL NOT
 EXCEED SIX (6) FEET IN HEIGHT.
  
 4.1 [ SATISFIED ] - VARIANCE IN-PROCESS (ZBA CASE NO.
 3394).
  
 5. [ SATISFIED ] - ENSURE THAT THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS
 BETWEEN THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING AND FENCING WITH THE
 EXISTING 60 INCH DRAINAGE PIPE IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER
 OF THE SITE. ANY IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED WITHIN THE
 REQUIRED EASEMENT WILL NEED TO BE APPROVED BY THE
 EASEMENT HOLDER.
  
 5.1 [ SATISFIED ] - NEW FENCING IS BEING PROPOSED TO BE
 INSTALLED AT THE SOUTHEAST END OF THE EASEMENT
 (ADJACENT TO GEORGIA AVENUE). CONSENT FROM THE CITY'S
 PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT WILL BE REQUIRED.
  
 6. [ SATISFIED ] - THE ENGINEERING PLANS SHOW CURBING
 GOING ACROSS THE FRONT OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE.
  
 7. [ SATISFIED ] - WHAT IS THE REASONING FOR EXTENDING
 THE ASPHALT PARKING LOT ALL THE WAY TO THE NORTHEAST
 CORNER OF THE OFFICE BUILDING? IS THIS A
 LOADING/UNLOADING AREA? IS THERE GOING TO BE STORAGE?
 DEPENDING UPON THE RESPONSE, SCREENING MAY BE REQUIRED.
 ADDITIONALLY, A TURNAROUND PARKING SPACE NEEDS TO BE
 PROVIDED AS THIS IS A DEAD-END ROW OF PARKING.
  
 8. [ SATISFIED ] - WITH UNDERSTANDING THAT THE
 APPLICANT WILL CONTINUE TO WORK WITH THE CITY ON
 PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY ALONG GEORGIA AVENUE ] - A
 SIDEWALK SHALL BE PROVIDED ON GEORGIA AVENUE CONNECTING
 THE SITE TO THE EXISTING SIDEWALK NETWORK.
  
 9. [ SATISFIED ] - AN INCREASED AND ENHANCED BUFFER
 NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED ALONG MADDOCK STREET AND GEORGIA
 AVENUE (INCREASE LANDSCAPING, NEW FENCING, ETC.). THIS
 WILL BE A PART OF FURTHER DISCUSSION WITH STAFF.
  
 10. [ SATISFIED ] - DETAILS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL
 SCREEN WALLS AND GATES AROUND THE LOADING/TRASH SERVICE
 AREA, ETC. ARE THESE SCREEN WALLS ABOVE GRADE? ARE THEY
 RETAINING WALLS? BOTH?
  
 10.1 [ SATISFIED ] - WHILE YOUR NARRATIVE DESCRIBES
 THIS AREA, A DETAIL OR CROSS-SECTION SHOULD BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 11. [ SATISFIED ] - IT IS SUGGESTED THAT PARKING SPACES
 ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPING BE MADE 16 FEET IN LENGTH WITH
 THE USE OF A CURB (NO WHEEL STOP) AND THAT THE
 LANDSCAPE AREA BE INCREASED IN SIZE TO ACCOMMODATE THE
 OVERHANG.
  
 11.1 [ SATISFIED ] - THERE APPEAR TO BE A FEW
 ADDITIONAL SPACES WHERE THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND CAN BE
 ENLARGED TO ALLOW THE OVERHANG. PLEASE CONTACT ME FOR
 SPECIFIC LOCATIONS.
  
 12. [ SATISFIED ] - NEED TO SHOW LOCATIONS FOR BIKE
 RACKS AND THE DATA TABLE NEEDS TO BE UPDATED TO SHOW
 COMPLIANCE WITH THE QUANTITY OF BIKE RACKS. BIKE RACKS
 SHOULD BE DISTRIBUTED AMONGST THE VARIOUS BUILDINGS
 (OFFICE, CLUBHOUSE, MAINTENANCE, ETC.).
  
 12.1 [ SATISFIED ] - THE NUMBER OF SPACES IN THE TABLE
 DO NOT APPEAR TO MATCH WHAT IS DRAWN ON THE SITE PLAN.
 ACCORDING TO THE SITE PLAN, THERE ARE FOUR (4) SPACES
 AT THE MAINTENANCE FACILITY, NOT TWO (2), THEREBY
 RESULTING IN 16 TOTAL BICYCLE SPACES. THE TABLE AND THE
 LABEL ON THE BICYCLE SPACES AT THE MAINTENANCE FACILITY
 NEED TO BE CORRECTED ACCORDINGLY.
  
 13. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - PLANS NEED TO SHOW THE
 LOCATIONS FOR ALL STOP BARS, CROSSWALKS, ETC.
  
 13.1 [ NOT SATISFIED ] - A STOP BAR IS MISSING
 SOUTHEAST OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. ADDITIONALLY, A
 STOP BAR WOULD EITHER NEED TO BE PROVIDED AT THE DRIVE
 AISLE TO THE SOUTHWEST OF THE DUMPSTER, OR THE ONE
 IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF THE DUMPSTER.
  
 13.1.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - THE PAVEMENT MARKINGS ON THE
 SITE PLAN DO NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE CIVIL
 PLANS.
  
 14. [ SATISFIED ] - IT APPEARS THAT THERE IS A PARKING
 SPACE IN FRONT OF THE OFFICE BUILDING DUMPSTER THAT
 WOULD CONFLICT WITH THE GATES ON THE ENCLOSURE.
  
 15. [ SATISFIED ] - IS PUBLIC WORKS GOING TO BE
 ACCEPTABLE OF THE LOCATION OF THE DUMPSTER BY THE
 OFFICE BUILDING? THIS SEEMS TO BE A LOT OF BACK-OUT
 REQUIRED. PLEASE OBTAIN CONFIRMATION.
  
 16. [ SATISFIED - SUBJECT TO CONDITION OF APPROVAL ] -
 IMPROVEMENTS AT THE MAINTENANCE FACILITY ARE SHOWN IN
 THE ACCESS EASEMENT. EITHER THE IMPROVEMENTS NEED TO BE
 MOVED TO OUTSIDE THE EASEMENT, OR CONSENT FROM THE
 EASEMENT HOLDER SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 17. [ SATISFIED ] - DETAILS FOR CHAIN LINK FENCING
 SHALL BE PROVIDED (HEIGHT, ETC.) AND SHALL COMPLY WITH
 MAXIMUM FENCE HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS.
  
 18. [ SATISFIED ] - WITH UNDERSTANDING THAT BUILDING
 DIVISION HAS INDICATED NO ROUTE IS REQUIRED ] - DOES
 THE MAINTENANCE FACILITY NEED AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM
 THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY? PLEASE CONFIRM.
  
 19. [ SATISFIED ] - SYMBOLOGY APPEARS TO BE MISSING
 FROM THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE AT THE MAINTENANCE
 FACILITY.
  
 20. [ SATISFIED ] - WHAT IS THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM
 THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE TO THE ACCESSIBLE BUILDING
 ENTRANCE?
  
 21. [ SATISFIED ] - DETAILS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE
 SCREENING PROPOSED AROUND THE STORAGE BINS.
  
 22. [ SATISFIED ] - THE DIMENSIONS OF THE DUMPSTER AT
 THE MAINTENANCE FACILITY DO NOT SEEM TO MATCH THAT
 SHOWN FOR THE DUMPSTER DETAIL. A SEPARATE DETAIL MAY
 NEED TO BE PROVIDED.
  
 22.1 [ SATISFIED ] - IS THE MAINTENACE FACILITY
 DUMPSTER TO BE PICKED UP BY A PRIVATE PROVIDER? PLEASE
 CLARIFY.
  
 23. [ SATISFIED ] - COVERED OUTDOOR STORAGE AT THE
 MAINTENANCE FACILITY NEEDS TO BE SCREENED IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH SEC. 94-315.B.1. WHAT IS PROPOSED TO BE STORED IN
 THIS AREA?
  
 24. [ SATISFIED ] - PLEASE NOTE THAT THE DEDICATION OF
 ANY RIGHT-OF-WAY WILL CHANGE THE PROPERTY LINE AND
 THEREBY CHANGE THE MEASUREMENT OF ANY SETBACKS, ETC.
  
 24.1 [ SATISIFIED ] - YOUR NARRATIVE INDICATES THAT NO
 RIGHT-OF-WAY IS BEING DEDICATED AS PART OF THIS
 PROJECT...HAS IT BEEN CONFIRMED THAT NO RIGHT-OF-WAY
 WILL BE DEDICATED TO ACCOMMODATE THE EXISTING
 ROUNDABOUT AT THE SOUTHER TERMINUS OF PARKER AVENUE?
  
 25. [ SATISFIED ] - THE SIDEWALK THAT LEAVES THE
 TERRACE ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE CLUBHOUSE, WHERE
 IS IT GOING TO? WHAT IS IS CONNECTING TO?
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL REVISED PLANS AND/OR
 DOCUMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 06-02-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 06-02-2021 Time 08:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 06-01-2021 Time 16:12 Sent To  
Notes
2021-06-02 08:53:52PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 06.01.2021
 PROJECT NO.: Z21030022
 CASE NO.: FSPR 21-02
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - ARE THERE ANY HISTORIC
 ELEMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS GOLF COURSE/CLUBHOUSE THAT
 COULD BE INCORPORATED INTO THE NEW FACILITIES?
  
 1.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - NUMEROUS ITEMS FROM THE OLD
 CLUBHOUSE/COURSE HAVE BEEN LOCATED. TOM FRANKEL HAS
 BEEN MADE AWARE AND IS TO BE COORDINATING A REVIEW,
 EVALUATION, ETC. NO COORDINATION HAS OCCURRED TO DATE.
  
 2. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - THE NETTING, IF LOCATED
 WITHIN A SETBACK, SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM FENCE
 HEIGHT PROVIDED IN SEC. 94-302.C.1. IF LOCATED OUTSIDE
 OF THE SETBACK, THE NETTING/POLES SHALL NOT EXCEED THE
 MAXIMUM HEIGHT PERMITTED WITHIN THE ZONING DISTRICT, AS
 PROVIDED IN SEC. 94-204.5.
  
 2.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - VARIANCE IN-PROCESS (ZBA CASE NO.
 3394).
  
 3. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - PHOTOMETRIC PLANS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED AND SHALL INDICATE COMPLIANCE WITH SEC.
 94-309.A., AS ALSO REQUIRED BY SEC. 94-273.D.60.B.4.
 ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE GLARE
 AND SHALL BE ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE AWAY
 FROM ALL ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT
 RESIDENCES, OR PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES.
  
 3.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - ON THE PHOTOMETRIC PLANS FOR THE
 DRIVING RANGE / PAR 3 COURSE, PLEASE PROVIDE THE
 PHOTOMETRIC LEVELS AT THE PROPERTY LINE TO SHOW THE
 IMPACT OF THE SHIELDING, ETC. LEVELS SHOULD NOT EXCEED
 0.5 FOOTCANDLES WHEN MEASURED ON THE PROPERTY ADJACENT
 TO A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD.
  
 4. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - FENCES/WALLS PROPOSED
 WITHIN THE FRONT SETBACK SHALL NOT EXCEED FOUR (4) FEET
 IN HEIGHT. FENCES/WALL LOCATED WITHIN OTHER SETBACKS
 SHALL NOT EXCEED SIX (6) FEET IN HEIGHT.
  
 4.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - VARIANCE IN-PROCESS (ZBA CASE NO.
 3394).
  
 5. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - ENSURE THAT THERE ARE NO
 CONFLICTS BETWEEN THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING AND FENCING
 WITH THE EXISTING 60 INCH DRAINAGE PIPE IN THE
 NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE. ANY IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED
 WITHIN THE REQUIRED EASEMENT WILL NEED TO BE APPROVED
 BY THE EASEMENT HOLDER.
  
 5.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - NEW FENCING IS BEING PROPOSED TO
 BE INSTALLED AT THE SOUTHEAST END OF THE EASEMENT
 (ADJACENT TO GEORGIA AVENUE). CONSENT FROM THE CITY'S
 PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT WILL BE REQUIRED.
  
 6. [ SATISFIED ] - THE ENGINEERING PLANS SHOW CURBING
 GOING ACROSS THE FRONT OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE.
  
 7. [ SATISFIED ] - WHAT IS THE REASONING FOR EXTENDING
 THE ASPHALT PARKING LOT ALL THE WAY TO THE NORTHEAST
 CORNER OF THE OFFICE BUILDING? IS THIS A
 LOADING/UNLOADING AREA? IS THERE GOING TO BE STORAGE?
 DEPENDING UPON THE RESPONSE, SCREENING MAY BE REQUIRED.
 ADDITIONALLY, A TURNAROUND PARKING SPACE NEEDS TO BE
 PROVIDED AS THIS IS A DEAD-END ROW OF PARKING.
  
 8. [ SATISFIED - WITH UNDERSTANDING THAT THE APPLICANT
 WILL CONTINUE TO WORK WITH THE CITY ON PEDESTRIAN
 CONNECTIVITY ALONG GEORGIA AVENUE ] - A SIDEWALK SHALL
 BE PROVIDED ON GEORGIA AVENUE CONNECTING THE SITE TO
 THE EXISTING SIDEWALK NETWORK.
  
 9. [ SATISFIED ] - AN INCREASED AND ENHANCED BUFFER
 NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED ALONG MADDOCK STREET AND GEORGIA
 AVENUE (INCREASE LANDSCAPING, NEW FENCING, ETC.). THIS
 WILL BE A PART OF FURTHER DISCUSSION WITH STAFF.
  
 10. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - DETAILS SHALL BE PROVIDED
 FOR ALL SCREEN WALLS AND GATES AROUND THE LOADING/TRASH
 SERVICE AREA, ETC. ARE THESE SCREEN WALLS ABOVE GRADE?
 ARE THEY RETAINING WALLS? BOTH?
  
 10.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - WHILE YOUR NARRATIVE DESCRIBES
 THIS AREA, A DETAIL OR CROSS-SECTION SHOULD BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 11. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - IT IS SUGGESTED THAT
 PARKING SPACES ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPING BE MADE 16 FEET
 IN LENGTH WITH THE USE OF A CURB (NO WHEEL STOP) AND
 THAT THE LANDSCAPE AREA BE INCREASED IN SIZE TO
 ACCOMMODATE THE OVERHANG.
  
 11.1 [ NEW COMMENT] - THERE APPEAR TO BE A FEW
 ADDITIONAL SPACES WHERE THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND CAN BE
 ENLARGED TO ALLOW THE OVERHANG. PLEASE CONTACT ME FOR
 SPECIFIC LOCATIONS.
  
 12. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - NEED TO SHOW LOCATIONS
 FOR BIKE RACKS AND THE DATA TABLE NEEDS TO BE UPDATED
 TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE QUANTITY OF BIKE RACKS.
 BIKE RACKS SHOULD BE DISTRIBUTED AMONGST THE VARIOUS
 BUILDINGS (OFFICE, CLUBHOUSE, MAINTENANCE, ETC.).
  
 12.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - THE NUMBER OF SPACES IN THE
 TABLE DO NOT APPEAR TO MATCH WHAT IS DRAWN ON THE SITE
 PLAN. ACCORDING TO THE SITE PLAN, THERE ARE FOUR (4)
 SPACES AT THE MAINTENANCE FACILITY, NOT TWO (2),
 THEREBY RESULTING IN 16 TOTAL BICYCLE SPACES. THE TABLE
 AND THE LABEL ON THE BICYCLE SPACES AT THE MAINTENANCE
 FACILITY NEED TO BE CORRECTED ACCORDINGLY.
  
 13. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - PLANS NEED TO SHOW THE
 LOCATIONS FOR ALL STOP BARS, CROSSWALKS, ETC.
  
 13.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - A STOP BAR IS MISSING SOUTHEAST
 OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. ADDITIONALLY, A STOP BAR
 WOULD EITHER NEED TO BE PROVIDED AT THE DRIVE AISLE TO
 THE SOUTHWEST OF THE DUMPSTER, OR THE ONE IMMEDIATELY
 SOUTH OF THE DUMPSTER.
  
 14. [ SATISFIED ] - IT APPEARS THAT THERE IS A PARKING
 SPACE IN FRONT OF THE OFFICE BUILDING DUMPSTER THAT
 WOULD CONFLICT WITH THE GATES ON THE ENCLOSURE.
  
 15. [ SATISFIED ] - IS PUBLIC WORKS GOING TO BE
 ACCEPTABLE OF THE LOCATION OF THE DUMPSTER BY THE
 OFFICE BUILDING? THIS SEEMS TO BE A LOT OF BACK-OUT
 REQUIRED. PLEASE OBTAIN CONFIRMATION.
  
 16. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - IMPROVEMENTS AT THE MAINTENANCE
 FACILITY ARE SHOWN IN THE ACCESS EASEMENT. EITHER THE
 IMPROVEMENTS NEED TO BE MOVED TO OUTSIDE THE EASEMENT,
 OR CONSENT FROM THE EASEMENT HOLDER SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 17. [ SATISFIED ] - DETAILS FOR CHAIN LINK FENCING
 SHALL BE PROVIDED (HEIGHT, ETC.) AND SHALL COMPLY WITH
 MAXIMUM FENCE HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS.
  
 18. [ SATISFIED - WITH UNDERSTANDING THAT BUILDING
 DIVISION HAS INDICATED NO ROUTE IS REQUIRED ] - DOES
 THE MAINTENANCE FACILITY NEED AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM
 THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY? PLEASE CONFIRM.
  
 19. [ SATISFIED ] - SYMBOLOGY APPEARS TO BE MISSING
 FROM THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE AT THE MAINTENANCE
 FACILITY.
  
 20. [ SATISFIED ] - WHAT IS THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM
 THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE TO THE ACCESSIBLE BUILDING
 ENTRANCE?
  
 21. [ SATISFIED ] - DETAILS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE
 SCREENING PROPOSED AROUND THE STORAGE BINS.
  
 22. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - THE DIMENSIONS OF THE
 DUMPSTER AT THE MAINTENANCE FACILITY DO NOT SEEM TO
 MATCH THAT SHOWN FOR THE DUMPSTER DETAIL. A SEPARATE
 DETAIL MAY NEED TO BE PROVIDED.
  
 22.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - IS THE MAINTENACE FACILITY
 DUMPSTER TO BE PICKED UP BY A PRIVATE PROVIDER? PLEASE
 CLARIFY.
  
 23. [ SATISFIED ] - COVERED OUTDOOR STORAGE AT THE
 MAINTENANCE FACILITY NEEDS TO BE SCREENED IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH SEC. 94-315.B.1. WHAT IS PROPOSED TO BE STORED IN
 THIS AREA?
  
 24. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - PLEASE NOTE THAT THE
 DEDICATION OF ANY RIGHT-OF-WAY WILL CHANGE THE PROPERTY
 LINE AND THEREBY CHANGE THE MEASUREMENT OF ANY
 SETBACKS, ETC.
  
 24.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - YOUR NARRATIVE INDICATES THAT NO
 RIGHT-OF-WAY IS BEING DEDICATED AS PART OF THIS
 PROJECT...HAS IT BEEN CONFIRMED THAT NO RIGHT-OF-WAY
 WILL BE DEDICATED TO ACCOMMODATE THE EXISTING
 ROUNDABOUT AT THE SOUTHER TERMINUS OF PARKER AVENUE?
  
 25. [ NEW COMMENT ] - THE SIDEWALK THAT LEAVES THE
 TERRACE ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE CLUBHOUSE, WHERE
 IS IT GOING TO? WHAT IS IS CONNECTING TO?
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL REVISED PLANS AND/OR
 DOCUMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-14-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 04-14-2021 Time 14:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 04-14-2021 Time 14:14 Sent To  
Notes
2021-04-14 14:15:02PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 04.14.2021
 PROJECT NO.: Z21030022
 CASE NO.: FSPR 21-02
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. ARE THERE ANY HISTORIC ELEMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS
 GOLF COURSE/CLUBHOUSE THAT COULD BE INCORPORATED INTO
 THE NEW FACILITIES?
  
 2. THE NETTING, IF LOCATED WITHIN A SETBACK, SHALL NOT
 EXCEED THE MAXIMUM FENCE HEIGHT PROVIDED IN SEC.
 94-302.C.1. IF LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE SETBACK, THE
 NETTING/POLES SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT
 PERMITTED WITHIN THE ZONING DISTRICT, AS PROVIDED IN
 SEC. 94-204.5.
  
 3. PHOTOMETRIC PLANS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND SHALL
 INDICATE COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. 94-309.A., AS ALSO
 REQUIRED BY SEC. 94-273.D.60.B.4. ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING
 SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE GLARE AND SHALL BE ARRANGED
 TO REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE AWAY FROM ALL ADJACENT
 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT RESIDENCES, OR PUBLIC
 THOROUGHFARES.
  
 4. FENCES/WALLS PROPOSED WITHIN THE FRONT SETBACK SHALL
 NOT EXCEED FOUR (4) FEET IN HEIGHT. FENCES/WALL LOCATED
 WITHIN OTHER SETBACKS SHALL NOT EXCEED SIX (6) FEET IN
 HEIGHT.
  
 5. ENSURE THAT THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS BETWEEN THE
 PROPOSED LANDSCAPING AND FENCING WITH THE EXISTING 60
 INCH DRAINAGE PIPE IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE.
 ANY IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED WITHIN THE REQUIRED EASEMENT
 WILL NEED TO BE APPROVED BY THE EASEMENT HOLDER.
  
 6. THE ENGINEERING PLANS SHOW CURBING GOING ACROSS THE
 FRONT OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE.
  
 7. WHAT IS THE REASONING FOR EXTENDING THE ASPHALT
 PARKING LOT ALL THE WAY TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE
 OFFICE BUILDING? IS THIS A LOADING/UNLOADING AREA? IS
 THERE GOING TO BE STORAGE? DEPENDING UPON THE RESPONSE,
 SCREENING MAY BE REQUIRED. ADDITIONALLY, A TURNAROUND
 PARKING SPACE NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED AS THIS IS A
 DEAD-END ROW OF PARKING.
  
 8. A SIDEWALK SHALL BE PROVIDED ON GEORGIA AVENUE
 CONNECTING THE SITE TO THE EXISTING SIDEWALK NETWORK.
  
 9. AN INCREASED AND ENHANCED BUFFER NEEDS TO BE
 PROVIDED ALONG MADDOCK STREET AND GEORGIA AVENUE
 (INCREASE LANDSCAPING, NEW FENCING, ETC.). THIS WILL BE
 A PART OF FURTHER DISCUSSION WITH STAFF.
  
 10. DETAILS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL SCREEN WALLS AND
 GATES AROUND THE LOADING/TRASH SERVICE AREA, ETC. ARE
 THESE SCREEN WALLS ABOVE GRADE? ARE THEY RETAINING
 WALLS? BOTH?
  
 11. IT IS SUGGESTED THAT PARKING SPACES ADJACENT TO
 LANDSCAPING BE MADE 16 FEET IN LENGTH WITH THE USE OF A
 CURB (NO WHEEL STOP) AND THAT THE LANDSCAPE AREA BE
 INCREASED IN SIZE TO ACCOMMODATE THE OVERHANG.
  
 12. NEED TO SHOW LOCATIONS FOR BIKE RACKS AND THE DATA
 TABLE NEEDS TO BE UPDATED TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE
 QUANTITY OF BIKE RACKS. BIKE RACKS SHOULD BE
 DISTRIBUTED AMONGST THE VARIOUS BUILDINGS (OFFICE,
 CLUBHOUSE, MAINTENANCE, ETC.).
  
 13. PLANS NEED TO SHOW THE LOCATIONS FOR ALL STOP BARS,
 CROSSWALKS, ETC.
  
 14. IT APPEARS THAT THERE IS A PARKING SPACE IN FRONT
 OF THE OFFICE BUILDING DUMPSTER THAT WOULD CONFLICT
 WITH THE GATES ON THE ENCLOSURE.
  
 15. IS PUBLIC WORKS GOING TO BE ACCEPTABLE OF THE
 LOCATION OF THE DUMPSTER BY THE OFFICE BUILDING? THIS
 SEEMS TO BE A LOT OF BACK-OUT REQUIRED. PLEASE OBTAIN
 CONFIRMATION.
  
 16. IMPROVEMENTS AT THE MAINTENANCE FACILITY ARE SHOWN
 IN THE ACCESS EASEMENT. EITHER THE IMPROVEMENTS NEED TO
 BE MOVED TO OUTSIDE THE EASEMENT, OR CONSENT FROM THE
 EASEMENT HOLDER SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 17. DETAILS FOR CHAIN LINK FENCING SHALL BE PROVIDED
 (HEIGHT, ETC.) AND SHALL COMPLY WITH MAXIMUM FENCE
 HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS.
  
 18. DOES THE MAINTENANCE FACILITY NEED AN ACCESSIBLE
 ROUTE FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY? PLEASE CONFIRM.
  
 19. SYMBOLOGY APPEARS TO BE MISSING FROM THE ACCESSIBLE
 PARKING SPACE AT THE MAINTENANCE FACILITY.
  
 20. WHAT IS THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM THE ACCESSIBLE
 PARKING SPACE TO THE ACCESSIBLE BUILDING ENTRANCE?
  
 21. DETAILS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE SCREENING
 PROPOSED AROUND THE STORAGE BINS.
  
 22. THE DIMENSIONS OF THE DUMPSTER AT THE MAINTENANCE
 FACILITY DO NOT SEEM TO MATCH THAT SHOWN FOR THE
 DUMPSTER DETAIL. A SEPARATE DETAIL MAY NEED TO BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 23. COVERED OUTDOOR STORAGE AT THE MAINTENANCE FACILITY
 NEEDS TO BE SCREENED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC.
 94-315.B.1. WHAT IS PROPOSED TO BE STORED IN THIS AREA?
  
 24. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE DEDICATION OF ANY RIGHT-OF-WAY
 WILL CHANGE THE PROPERTY LINE AND THEREBY CHANGE THE
 MEASUREMENT OF ANY SETBACKS, ETC.
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL REVISED PLANS AND/OR
 DOCUMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved