City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Details - Project Z21030017

Plan Review Stops For Project Z21030017

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	11-18-2021		Cont ID
Sent By	llouie			Date	11-18-2021	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	llouie			Date	11-18-2021	Time	Sent To

Notes

2021-11-18 16:45:49	GENERAL COMMENTS:

	1.) THE SURVEYS FOR 510 SUNSET ROAD AND 519 AVON ROAD
	HAVE NOW BEEN PROVIDED. AS DISCUSSED WITH STAFF, YOU
	WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING THE LEVEL-OF-SERVICE
	(LOS) ANALYSIS FOR THESE PARCELS. LOS ANALYSIS WILL BE
	REQUIRED FOR TRAFFIC, WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SOLID
	WASTE AND SCHOOLS.

	2.) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL
	PLANS/DOCUMENTS ARE PROVIDED IN DIGITAL FORMAT. ONE
	FLASH DRIVE WAS EMPTY IN THE LAST RESUBMITTAL.


	FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION (PB 1883):

	1.) IN YOUR APPLICATION FOR THE FUTURE LAND USE (FLU)
	MAP AMENDMENT, THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT MUST STATE
	THAT THE REQUEST IS TO CHANGE TO FLU DESIGNATION OF THE
	SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM SINGLE FAMILY (SF) TO MULTIFAMILY
	MEDIUM DENSITY (MFMD) RESIDENTIAL. THE LANGUAGE IN THE
	STATEMENT MUST INCLUDE INFORMATION ON THE EXISTING AND
	PROPOSED MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DENSITY. AS A
	PRIVATELY-INITIATED APPLICATION FOR 2420 FLORIDA
	AVENUE, THE APPLICANT MUST CLEARLY STATE THE INTENT OF
	THE APPLICATION.

	2.) THE APPLICATION MUST INCLUDE A WRITTEN STATEMENT TO
	HOW THE PROPOSED FLU AMENDMENT MEETS AT LEAST ONE OF
	THE STANDARDS PROVIDED IN FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT
	POLICY 1.1.5 OF THE CITY?S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (I.E.
	WRITTEN PARAGRAPHS TO HOW THE PROPOSED FLU AMENDMENT
	SPECIALLY ADDRESSES THE STANDARD(S).

	3.) THERE IS AN INCONSISTENCY WITH THE SUBMITTED LOS
	ANALYSIS. THE LOS ANALYSIS IS MIXED WITH SOME OF THE
	ANALYSIS CONSISTING OF JUST 2420 FLORIDA AVENUE AND
	SOME OF THE ANALYSIS FOR ALL PARCELS INVOLVED IN THE
	AMENDMENT (2420 FLORIDA AVENUE, 510 SUNSET ROAD AND 519
	AVON ROAD). NOW THAT THE SURVEYS FOR 510 SUNSET AND 519
	AVON ROAD HAVE BEEN PROVIDED, THE SURVEY CAN BE USED TO
	ACCURATELY COMPLETE THE LOS ANALYSIS AND COMBINED
	TOGETHER. THE LOS ANALYSIS MUST BE ACCURATE AND
	CONSISTENT AND MUST INCLUDE ALL PARCELS INVOLVED IN THE
	FLU AMENDMENT.

	4.) THERE IS AN INCONSISTENCY WITH THE SUBMITTED
	CERTIFICATION LETTERS. SOME LETTERS ARE JUST FOR 2420
	FLORIDA AVENUE (I.E. SCHOOL BOARD AND DRAINAGE); AND
	OTHERS SEEM TO INCLUDE 510 SUNSET ROAD AND 519 AVON
	ROAD. NOW THAT THE SURVEYS FOR 510 SUNSET ROAD AND 519
	AVON ROAD HAVE BEEN PROVIDED, THE CERTIFICATION LETTER
	FOR ALL REQUIRED PUBLIC FACILITIES LETTERS CAN BE
	COMBINED AS ONE.


	REZONING:

	1.) FOR THE PRIVATELY-INITIATED APPLICATION, THE
	APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE A RESPONSE TO EACH OF THE
	REZONING STANDARDS IN SEC. 94-32 OF THE ZONING AND LAND
	DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AS HOW IT RELATES TO THE
	APPLICATION. A BRIEF UMBRELLA STATEMENT (AS PROVIDED IN
	THE 7/30/21 RESUBMITTAL) DOES NOT SUFFICE NOR DOES IT
	DEMONSTRATE HOW THE PROPOSED REZONING MEETS EACH
	STANDARD. THIS IS A REQUIRED COMPONENT TO COMPLETING
	THE APPLICATION.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	09-01-2021		Cont ID
Sent By	llouie			Date	09-01-2021	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	llouie			Date	09-01-2021	Time	Sent To

Notes

2021-09-01 08:34:05	GENERAL COMMENTS:

	1.) AS DISCUSSED WITH THE AGENT, THE APPLICATION CANNOT
	MOVE FORWARD WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT
	(FLUMA) AND REZONING APPLICATIONS WITHOUT THE PARCELS
	TO THE SOUTH (510 SUNSET RD. AND 519 AVON RD.), AS
	PROCEEDING WITH JUST THE SUBJECT PROPERTY (2420 FLORIDA
	AVENUE) WOULD CONSTITUTE SPOT ZONING WHICH IS NOT
	PERMITTED. A SEPARATE APPLICATION OR PROPERTY OWNER(S)
	CONSENT FROM THE SOUTH PARCELS MUST BE SUBMITTED AND
	REVIEWED PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE FLUMA AND
	REZONING APPLICATIONS.


	FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION (PB CASE NO.
	1883):

	1.) JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT MUST STATE THAT THE REQUEST
	IS TO CHANGE THE FUTURE LAND USE OF THE SUBJECT
	PROPERTY FROM SINGLE FAMILY (SF) TO MULTIFAMILY MEDIUM
	DENSITY (MFMD). THE LANGUAGE IN THE STATEMENT MUST
	INCLUDE INFORMATION ON THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED
	MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DENSITY FOR THE PROJECT.

	2.) THE APPLICATION MUST INCLUDE A WRITTEN STATEMENT TO
	HOW THE PROPOSED FLUMA MEETS AT LEAST ONE OF THE
	STANDARDS PROVIDED IN FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT POLICY
	1.1.5 OF THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. (I.E. WRITTEN
	PARAGRAPH(S) TO HOW THE PROPOSED FLUMA SPECIFICALLY
	ADDRESSES THE STANDARD(S).

	3.) FLASH DRIVE FOR THE FLUMA DOES NOT HAVE ANY CONTENT
	(HARDCOPY WILL SUFFICE FOR THE MOMENT).

	4.) THERE IS INCONSISTENCY WITH THE LOS ANALYSIS - THE
	ANALYSIS MUST BE PROVIDED FOR JUST THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
	OR ALL PARCELS NECESSARY FOR THE FLUMA. WITHOUT
	CONSENT, FROM THE SOUTH PROPERTY OWNER(S) THE DATA
	CANNOT BE ANALYZED AS A GROUP OF PARCELS FOR THE FLUMA.

	5.) THERE IS AN INCONSISTENCY WITH THE SUBMITTED
	CERTIFICATION LETTERS. SOME LETTERS ARE FOR JUST THE
	SUBJECT PROPERTY (I.E. SCHOOL BOARD, DRAINAGE); AND
	OTHERS SEEM TO INCLUDE THE SOUTH PARCELS (I.E.
	TRAFFIC). THE CERTIFICATION LETTERS MUST BE CONSISTENT.

	6.) CERTIFICATION LETTER FOR SOLID WASTE IS MISSING.
	PLEASE CONTACT THE SOLID WASTE AUTHORITY (SWA) FOR THE
	CERTIFICATION LETTER.



	REZONING APPLCIATION (PB CASE NO. 1883A):

	1.) THE APPLICATION MUST PROVIDE A RESPONSE TO EACH OF
	THE REZONING STANDARDS IN SECTION 94-32 OF THE ZLDRS AS
	TO HOW IT RELATES TO THE APPLICATION. A BRIEF UMBRELLA
	STATEMENT (AS PROVIDED IN THE 7/30/21 RESUBMITTAL) DOES
	NOT SUFFICE NOR DOES IT SHOW HOW THE PROPOSED REZONING
	MEETS EACH STANDARD.



	INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:

	* PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	* WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE
	(5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS
	AND DOCUMENTS.

	* CHANGES TO ANY INFORMATION IN THE RESUBMITTAL MAY
	RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.

	* CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458.