 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z21020016
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z21020016 |
| Review Stop |
AIPP |
ART IN PUBLIC PLACES |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-09-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
scwelter |
Date |
04-09-2021 |
Time |
15:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
scwelter |
Date |
04-09-2021 |
Time |
15:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-04-09 15:35:45 | PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT: | | | IF TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT ARE | | | OVER $500,000 IT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC ART | | | REQUIREMENT AS PER CITY ORDINANCE. | | | SECTION 78-129: ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, | | | INCLUDING NEW CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR | | | IMPROVEMENT OF AN EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE TOTAL | | | CONSTRUCTION COSTS ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN | | | $500,000 ARE SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT. | | | OPTION 1: INSTALL ARTWORK ON THE DEVELOPMENT SITE | | | VALUED IN AN AMOUNT NOT LESS THAN ONE PERCENT OF THE | | | TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS; OR | | | OPTION 2: CONTRIBUTE AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO 75 PERCENT OF | | | ONE PERCENT OF THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR DEPOSIT | | | TO THE PUBLIC ART ACCOUNT. | | | A COMPLETED PUBLIC ART ASSESSMENT APPLICATION IS | | | REQUIRED AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | NOTE GIANT PINK FLAMINGO MAY NOT BE USED TO SATISFY THE | | | PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT. | | | | | | PLEASE CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER AT [email protected] OR | | | 561.822.1521 TO OBTAIN AN APPLICATION AND REVIEW THE | | | REQUIREMENTS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
AIPP |
ART IN PUBLIC PLACES |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-11-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
scwelter |
Date |
03-11-2021 |
Time |
10:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
scwelter |
Date |
03-11-2021 |
Time |
10:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-11 10:55:12 | PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT: | | | IF TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT ARE | | | OVER $500,000 IT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC ART | | | REQUIREMENT AS PER CITY ORDINANCE. | | | SECTION 78-129: ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, | | | INCLUDING NEW CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR | | | IMPROVEMENT OF AN EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE TOTAL | | | CONSTRUCTION COSTS ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN | | | $500,000 ARE SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT. | | | OPTION 1: INSTALL ARTWORK ON THE DEVELOPMENT SITE | | | VALUED IN AN AMOUNT NOT LESS THAN ONE PERCENT OF THE | | | TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS; OR | | | OPTION 2: CONTRIBUTE AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO 75 PERCENT OF | | | ONE PERCENT OF THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR DEPOSIT | | | TO THE PUBLIC ART ACCOUNT. | | | A COMPLETED PUBLIC ART ASSESSMENT APPLICATION IS | | | REQUIRED AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | PLEASE CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER AT [email protected] OR | | | 561.822.1521 TO OBTAIN AN APPLICATION AND REVIEW THE | | | REQUIREMENTS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
04-16-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
04-16-2021 |
Time |
18:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
04-16-2021 |
Time |
18:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-04-16 18:13:38 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AN ASBESTOS | | | SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT | | | REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963, | | | OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 3. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR | | | THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, | | | AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 4. GREASE/OIL INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE/OIL INTERCEPTOR | | | WILL BE REQUIRED. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, | | | SIZE AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT TIM LARGE, CHIEF | | | PLUMBING INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT | | | (561) 805-6692, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 5. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, | | | FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, | | | GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, | | | SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 6. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER | | | AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY, | | | INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE | | | CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION | | | THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY. | | | | | | 7. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT | | | TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE | | | ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP | | | ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC | | | PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-10-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
03-10-2021 |
Time |
20:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
scwelter |
Date |
03-11-2021 |
Time |
10:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-10 20:56:03 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AN ASBESTOS | | | SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT | | | REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963, | | | OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 3. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. SITE PLAN, | | | SHEET SP-1, SHOWS THAT THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES | | | ARE NOT THE CLOSEST PARKING SPACES TO THE OFFICE. PER | | | SECTION 208.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE | | | PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST | | | POSSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO AN | | | ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING | | | SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA | | | ACCESSIBILITY CODE | | | | | | 4. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR | | | THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, | | | AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 5. GREASE/OIL INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE/OIL INTERCEPTOR | | | WILL BE REQUIRED. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, | | | SIZE AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT TIM LARGE, CHIEF | | | PLUMBING INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT | | | (561) 805-6692, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 6. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, | | | FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, | | | GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, | | | SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 7. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER | | | AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY, | | | INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE | | | CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION | | | THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY. | | | | | | 8. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT | | | TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE | | | ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP | | | ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC | | | PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-09-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
07-09-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
07-09-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-16-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
06-16-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
06-16-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-06-16 09:41:05 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD | | | CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-822-2262 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | -IF DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE AND METER BOX ON PRIVATE | | | PROPERTY AND NOT IN UTILITY EASEMENT, THEN NEEDS | | | UTILITY EASEMENT AROUND IT. UE SHOULD NOT INCLUDE | | | BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES. | | | | | | -PLEASE UPDATE LIGHT POLE POSITIONS ON CIVIL PLANS TO | | | MATCH ADJUSTED SITE PLANS. ALSO ADD THE SAME CALLOUT | | | NOTES ABOUT FIELD ADJUSTMENTS. | | | | | | -VERIFY WATER METER BOX WILL BE IN SOD. | | | | | | -HISTORIC PICTURES SHOW CROSSWALK AT NORTH DRIVEWAY. | | | PLEASE VERIFY IF THE PROJECT CHANGING THAT TO CURBING | | | OR IF REMAINING THE SAME. | | | | | | -FOR THE DIRECTIONAL SEPARATOR AT NORTH DRIVEWAY PLEASE | | | VERIFY: 1) IF IT WILL BE SOD. 2) IF WILL HAVE RAISED | | | CURBING. 3) WILL NOT CONFLICT WITH ADJACENT DRAINAGE | | | STRUCTURE MAINTENANCE ? MAY NEED SOME SEPARATION | | | DISTANCE. | | | | | | -VERIFY WHAT THE 2 FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT RUNNING ALONG | | | EASTERN PROPERTY LINE IS BEING USED FOR. MAY BE A | | | FRANCHISE UTILITY. IF SO, CHECK TO MAKE SURE THERE WILL | | | BE NO MAINTENANCE CONFLICTS SUCH AS TREE ROOTS DAMAGING | | | UTILITIES. MAY NEED ADDITIONAL ROOT BARRIERS OR | | | CLEARANCE DISTANCE FOR PROPOSED TREES. | | | | | | -PROPOSED TREE LOOKS CLOSE TO PRIVATE FIRELINE BACKFLOW | | | ASSEMBLY. ADD ROOT BARRIERS AS NEEDED. | | | | | | -IS THE WATER METER BOX REMAINING IN EXISTING LOCATION | | | OR BEING RELOCATED? | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-06-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
04-06-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
04-06-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-04-15 14:06:55 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD | | | CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-822-2262 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE RESPOND IN WRITING TO COMMENTS AS FOLLOW: | | | | | | -LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS A 6 FOOT MONUMENT SIGN NEAR | | | BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES AND WATER SERVICES. PLEASE VERIFY | | | MONUMENT SIGN IS AT LEAST THREE FEET AWAY FROM WATER | | | UTILITIES. | | | | | | -LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS TREES NEAR WATER UTILITIES | | | (BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES, WATER SERVICES, METER BOXES, AND | | | FIRE HYDRANTS). PLEASE ENSURE THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS | | | AND ADD ROOT BARRIERS WHERE TREE ROOTS CAN ENCROACH ON | | | WATER UTILITIES. | | | | | | -PROPERTY WILL HAVE TO PAY ASSOCIATED UTILITY BILLING | | | FEES/CHARGES FOR FIRELINES ON SITE. | | | | | | -PLEASE ENSURE THAT LIGHTING POLES HAVE SUFFICIENT | | | CLEARANCE DISTANCE FROM WATER UTILITIES. | | | | | | -EASTERN FIRE HYDRANT APPEARS TO BE SLIGHTLY | | | ENCROACHING ON SIDEWALK. AT FORMAL ENGINEERING | | | SUBMITTAL, PLEASE RELOCATE SLIGHTLY SO THAT PEDESTRIANS | | | DO NOT WALK INTO THE FIRE HYDRANT. | | | | | | -AT FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SUBMIT | | | ENLARGED/ZOOMED PLAN OF THE AREA AROUND THE METERED | | | WATER SERVICES AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES. CANNOT SEE | | | CLEARLY IF THE PROPOSED LAYOUT MEETS STANDARDS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-04-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
03-04-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
03-04-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-11 08:02:25 | 1. PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY | | | OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC | | | RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF | | | YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE | | | MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL | | | IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT | | | [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER | | | ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION | | | ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD | | | SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC. | | | 2. AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR | | | MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI | | | CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL | | | 3. PLEASE SUBMIT PRELIMINARY UTILITY ENGINEERING PLANS. | | | PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF | | | ALL WATER, STORM WATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES, | | | INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND | | | SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, | | | METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE | | | SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING | | | GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, | | | ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL | | | INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER | | | LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE | | | PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN | | | VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. | | | ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND | | | PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER | | | OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & | | | TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL | | | UTILITY CROSSINGS. CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE, | | | AND REMOVE ANY ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 | | | INCHES FROM CITY RIGHT OF WAY. | | | 4. PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE | | | DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB | | | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION). | | | 5. SHOW PROPOSED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE PER CURRENT CITY OF | | | WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-7. | | | 6. CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY | | | SEWER ARE REQUIRED. | | | 7. PLEASE CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA | | | AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA. | | | 8. PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION | | | INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929). | | | 9. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND | | | PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM | | | AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE | | | PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER. | | | 10. IS THERE A PROPOSED SANITARY CONNECTION? IF SO | | | PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY AND STORM SEWER | | | ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE. | | | 11. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS. | | | 12. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION OF WATER | | | METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION. | | | 13. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES | | | OF WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS. | | | 14. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING | | | APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT | | | SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING | | | SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED | | | LEAD-FREE DESIGN. | | | 15. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL CLEARLY SHOW ROAD | | | RIGHT OF WAY. | | | 16. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY MAINS | | | ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY | | | LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT | | | PARCELS. | | | 18. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER MAINS | | | ARE BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL | | | ADDRESSES. | | | 19. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO | | | PROVIDE 50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH | | | SIDE OF PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY | | | AREAS PER CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-9. | | | 20. PLEASE NOTE THAT A PRE-PPRC-SUBMITTAL MEETING WITH | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES IS HIGHLY SUGGESTED. | | | 21. PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING. | | | | | | RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, CITY OF WPB ENG. | | | SERVICES | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 MOBILE: (561) 246-9525 FAX: | | | (561) 494-1116 EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD | | | CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-822-2262 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | PLEASE RESPOND IN WRITING TO COMMENTS AS FOLLOW: | | | | | | -PLEASE ADD SYMBOL LEGEND TO CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN. | | | INCLUDE THE SYMBOL THAT LOOKS LIKE A BULLSEYE. | | | | | | -ADD WATER DEMAND CALCULATIONS TO CIVIL PLAN. | | | | | | -DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE IS BUILT IN DRAINAGE EASEMENT. IS | | | SPECIAL APPROVAL NEEDED TO DO THAT? | | | | | | -IF EXISTING DOMESTIC BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY IS NOT | | | LEAD-FREE COMPLIANT, IT WILL NEED TO BE REPLACED WHEN | | | RELOCATED. | | | | | | -IS A DRAINAGE EASEMENT NEEDED AT THE NORTH CORNER OF | | | PROPERTY SIMILAR TO THE EAST CORNER? | | | | | | -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL: VERIFY IF THERE IS A | | | SHUT OFF VALVE FOR THE EASTERN FIRE HYDRANT AND SHOW ON | | | PLAN, ADD WATER MAIN MATERIAL TYPE TO LABELS, AND ADD | | | WATER SERVICE STANDARD DETAILS PAGE. | | | | | | -ADD PROPERTY ADDRESS TO CIVIL PLAN | | | | | | -THE EASTERN FIRE HYDRANT AND ENTRANCE SIDEWALK APPEAR | | | TOO CLOSE TOGETHER. NEED MORE CLEARANCE FOR | | | MAINTENANCE. | | | | | | -VERIFY LOCATION OF EASTERN HYDRANT. IF OUTSIDE OF | | | UTILITY EASEMENT, MAY NEED ADDITIONAL EASEMENT. | | | | | | -STORMWATER UTILITY APPEARS TO BE CROSSING INTO | | | ADJACENT PROPERTY. IS SPECIAL APPROVAL NEEDED TO DO | | | THAT? | | | | | | -APPEARS TO BE SOME TREES CONFLICTS WITH UNDERGROUND | | | UTILITIES. PLEASE VERIFY NO CONFLICT WITH ROOTS AND | | | TREES NEAR THE DCDA FIRELINE SERVICE AND NEAR THE | | | EASTERN CORNER OF PROPERTY NEAR PROPOSED CONTROL | | | STRUCTURE AND OUTFALL PIPE. | | | | | | -IS THE MANHOLE NEAR EASTERN CORNER OF PROPERTY FOR | | | STORMWATER DRAINAGE OR SANITARY SEWER? | | | | | | -ARE THERE PROPOSED FIRE SPRINKLERS IN BUILDING, AND IS | | | THE BUSINESS INTENDING TO USE THE PRIVATELY-OWNED | | | FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-22-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
06-22-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
06-22-2021 |
Time |
11:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-05-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
03-05-2021 |
Time |
12:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
03-05-2021 |
Time |
12:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-05 12:59:05 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE INTENDED | | | TO PROVIDE GUIDANCE FOR BUILDING PLAN SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE | | | OCCUPANCY TYPE, PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE. | | | | | | 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT AN | | | THAT WATER SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED | | | ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | 9. A COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLAN SHALL BE PROVIDED THAT | | | ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL DISTANCES, COMMON | | | PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, EXIT SIGNS, | | | EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A PUBLIC WAY, FIRE | | | EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE SAFETY FEATURES | | | AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE | | | SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY | | | DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS. | | | | | | 12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-12-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aburnett |
Date |
07-12-2021 |
Time |
15:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aburnett |
Date |
07-12-2021 |
Time |
15:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-07-12 15:23:47 | FROM: ANDREW BURNETT, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1562 | | | PROJECT: FLAMINGO CAR WASH CPD Z21020016 | | | JULY 12,2021 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN: | | | ? SATISFIED. ADD BRAZILIAN PEPPER TO LIST AND SHOW AS | | | REMOVE WITH NO MITIGATION REQUIRED. | | | ? SATISFIED. SHOW SQUARE FOOTAGE OF MITIGATION DUE FOR | | | EACH TREE TO BE REMOVED ON THE CHART. | | | ? SATISFIED. CHART SHOWS 2 RELOCATED LIVE OAKS, BUT 3 | | | ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. REQUIRED OPEN SPACE FOR CALCULATING | | | REQUIRED SHADE TREES AND FLOWERING TREES IS 40%. SHOW | | | THE CORRECT SQUARE FOOTAGE ON THE REQUIREMENTS CHART | | | AND RECALCULATE. | | | | | | 52925.4 SQ FT LOT, 40% IS 21170 SQ FT. 15 TREES | | | REQUIRED, 6 FLOWERING TREES AND 43 SHRUBS. CORRECT ON | | | CHART. BUFFER TREES AND PARKING LOT TREES CAN BE | | | COUNTED. SHORT ON FLOWERING TREES. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE AND NUMBER OF PALM | | | SUBSTITUTIONS FOR REQUIRED TREES NOT EXCEEDING 35 | | | PERCENT PER SECTION 94-442 (D). | | | COULD NOT LOCATE ON PLAN, ADD TO TREE REQUIREMENT CHART | | | SO INFORMATION IS CONSOLIDATED. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING | | | LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION | | | 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS. | | | COULD NOT LOCATE PLAN IN THE SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. BUFFER LENGTHS SHOWN ON CHART ON LP-2 DO | | | NOT MATCH SURVEY LENGTHS. REVISE AND SHOW NEW | | | CALCULATIONS. (6/21/21 SEE NOTE :#17) | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PROVIDE REQUIRED BUFFER TREES AT ONE FOR | | | EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR EASTERN BUFFER OR | | | REQUEST A WAIVER. THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT NEEDS TO BE | | | CLARIFIED IF IT WILL BE USED OR NOT IN COORDINATION | | | WITH THE ADJACENT PROJECT. PERMISSION MAY BE SOUGHT FOR | | | INSTALLING THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AS AN ALTERNATIVE. | | | EXTRA TREES IN PARKING AREA WOULD HAVE TO BE PART OF | | | ANY WAIVER JUSTIFICATION. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. WESTERN BUFFER WILL NEED TO BE MODIFIED | | | TO INCORPORATE THE SIDEWALK CONNECTION AS DESCRIBED IN | | | THE ZONING COMMENTS. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. NORTHERN 5 FOOT BUFFER SHOULD BE CONSTANT | | | ACROSS THE ENTIRE LENGTH WITH ACCESS OPENINGS FOR | | | SIDEWALK ACCESS ONLY. SHADE TREES SHOULD BE CONSISTENT | | | WITH THE THEME FOR ALL PROPERTIES, THE ROYAL PALMS DO | | | NOT PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TREE CANOPY. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. SHOW LINEAR FOOTAGE OF LANDSCAPED AREA | | | ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING MEETS THE REQUIREMENT OF 30 | | | PERCENT PER SECTION 94-443(E)(1) FOR THE BUILDING. | | | | | | COULD NOT LOCATE ON PLAN. CONSOLIDATE ALL LANDSCAPE | | | REQUIREMENTS IN ONE CHART. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. TAGS ARE NOT SHOWN ON LP-1, MAKE SURE | | | THEY ARE ADDED. | | | | | | 11. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE PLANT LIST: | | | ? SATISFIED. QUANTITY FOR SILVER BUTTONWOOD TREES IS | | | NOT INDICATED, AND SIZE MUST BE 12 FEET. | | | ? SATISFIED. CRAPE MYRTLE MUST BE 12 FEET. | | | ? ALL SPECIES LISTED UNDER TREES MUST MEET THE 12 FOOT | | | HEIGHT REQUIREMENT TO QUALIFY AS TREES, OTHERWISE MOVE | | | TO SHRUB CATEGORY. | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF DRAINAGE LINES ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH TREES | | | AND LANDSCAPING. RELOCATE UTILITY LOCATIONS OR EXPAND | | | LANDSCAPE AREAS TO ACCOMMODATE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH | | | LANDSCAPING. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED | | | VALVES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 14. SATISFIED. ROW OF PARKING SOUTH OF BUILDING SHOULD | | | BE MODIFIED TO BE 18 FEET LENGTH INCLUDING CURB AND | | | OVERHANG. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENT 4/16/21: | | | | | | 15. SATISFIED REMOVE TREE MITIGATION CREDITS FOR THE | | | RELOCATED PIGEON PLUM, LIVE OAKS AND SABAL PALMS AND | | | RECALCULATE TOTAL. MITIGATION CAN ONLY BE PROVIDED WITH | | | NEWLY ADDED MATERIAL. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENT 6/21/2021 | | | | | | 16. SATISFIED THE TREES AND PALMS THAT ARE LISTED AS | | | TO BE RELOCATED AND REMOVED MUST NO LONGER BE SHOWN ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. THIS INCLUDES USING A LIGHTER LINE | | | WEIGHT. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN IS TO SHOW THE FINAL | | | LANDSCAPE LAYOUT, SO THE TREES WOULD BE SHOWN WHERE | | | THEY WILL BE RELOCATED TO, NOT WHERE THEY CAME FROM. | | | | | | 17. SATISFIED THE PROPERTY LINE DIMENSIONS LISTED ON | | | THE TREE REQUIREMENTS CHART DO NOT MATCH THE DIMENSIONS | | | SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN OR SURVEY. WHILE THEY ARE CLOSE, | | | THE WEST PROPERTY LINE WILL GO TO 215 FEET AND THUS | | | REQUIRES AN ADDITIONAL TREE. UPDATE THE CHART | | | ACCORDINGLY. NOTE: IT APPEARS THAT THE BUFFERS HAVE | | | ENOUGH BUFFER TREES, EVEN WITH THE ONE ADDITIONAL THAT | | | IS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 18. SATISFIED LEAVING THE AREA WITH THE OLD DRIVEWAY | | | CUT VIOLATES THE 1 TREE EVERY 30 FEET AND THE HEDGE | | | REQUIRED WITHIN BUFFERS ADJACENT TO VEHICULAR USE | | | AREAS. THE LANDSCAPE PLANS MUST SHOW FULL COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE LANDSCAPE CODE. NOTE: THE LANDSCAPE TABLES | | | NEED TO BE UPDATED TO REFLECT MATERIAL THAT IS SHOW IN | | | THIS LOCATION. 9 BUTTON SIGNS CAN BE INCORPORATED INTO | | | THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER. | | | | | | 19. SATISFIED A SABAL PALM IS SHOWN LOCATED WITHIN THE | | | REVISED DRAINAGE EASEMENT ALONG THE BRANDSMART | | | PROPERTY. THE CITY DOES NOT PERMIT TREES TO BE PLANTED | | | WITHIN CITY DRAINAGE EASEMENTS. THE SABAL PALM WILL | | | NEED TO BE RELOCATED OUT OF THE EASEMENT. | | | | | | 20. SATISFIED THE LIVE OAKS ARE IN CLOSE PROXIMITY OF | | | THE REVISED DRAINAGE EASEMENT BY BRANDSMART PROPERTY | | | ROOT BARRIER. PLANTING LOCATION OF OAK SHOULD BE | | | SHIFTED AWAY FROM THE BARRIER IF POSSIBLE OR SELECT A | | | SMALLER TREE VARIETY FOR THE LOCATION. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-21-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aburnett |
Date |
06-21-2021 |
Time |
15:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aburnett |
Date |
06-21-2021 |
Time |
15:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-06-21 15:33:55 | FROM: ANDREW BURNETT, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1562 | | | PROJECT: FLAMINGO CAR WASH CPD Z21020016 | | | JUNE 21,2021 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN: | | | ? SATISFIED. ADD BRAZILIAN PEPPER TO LIST AND SHOW AS | | | REMOVE WITH NO MITIGATION REQUIRED. | | | ? SATISFIED. SHOW SQUARE FOOTAGE OF MITIGATION DUE FOR | | | EACH TREE TO BE REMOVED ON THE CHART. | | | ? SATISFIED. CHART SHOWS 2 RELOCATED LIVE OAKS, BUT 3 | | | ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. REQUIRED OPEN SPACE FOR CALCULATING | | | REQUIRED SHADE TREES AND FLOWERING TREES IS 40%. SHOW | | | THE CORRECT SQUARE FOOTAGE ON THE REQUIREMENTS CHART | | | AND RECALCULATE. | | | | | | 52925.4 SQ FT LOT, 40% IS 21170 SQ FT. 15 TREES | | | REQUIRED, 6 FLOWERING TREES AND 43 SHRUBS. CORRECT ON | | | CHART. BUFFER TREES AND PARKING LOT TREES CAN BE | | | COUNTED. SHORT ON FLOWERING TREES. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE AND NUMBER OF PALM | | | SUBSTITUTIONS FOR REQUIRED TREES NOT EXCEEDING 35 | | | PERCENT PER SECTION 94-442 (D). | | | COULD NOT LOCATE ON PLAN, ADD TO TREE REQUIREMENT CHART | | | SO INFORMATION IS CONSOLIDATED. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING | | | LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION | | | 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS. | | | COULD NOT LOCATE PLAN IN THE SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 5. NOT SATISFIED. BUFFER LENGTHS SHOWN ON CHART ON LP-2 | | | DO NOT MATCH SURVEY LENGTHS. REVISE AND SHOW NEW | | | CALCULATIONS. (6/21/21 SEE NOTE :#17) | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PROVIDE REQUIRED BUFFER TREES AT ONE FOR | | | EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR EASTERN BUFFER OR | | | REQUEST A WAIVER. THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT NEEDS TO BE | | | CLARIFIED IF IT WILL BE USED OR NOT IN COORDINATION | | | WITH THE ADJACENT PROJECT. PERMISSION MAY BE SOUGHT FOR | | | INSTALLING THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AS AN ALTERNATIVE. | | | EXTRA TREES IN PARKING AREA WOULD HAVE TO BE PART OF | | | ANY WAIVER JUSTIFICATION. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. WESTERN BUFFER WILL NEED TO BE MODIFIED | | | TO INCORPORATE THE SIDEWALK CONNECTION AS DESCRIBED IN | | | THE ZONING COMMENTS. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. NORTHERN 5 FOOT BUFFER SHOULD BE CONSTANT | | | ACROSS THE ENTIRE LENGTH WITH ACCESS OPENINGS FOR | | | SIDEWALK ACCESS ONLY. SHADE TREES SHOULD BE CONSISTENT | | | WITH THE THEME FOR ALL PROPERTIES, THE ROYAL PALMS DO | | | NOT PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TREE CANOPY. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. SHOW LINEAR FOOTAGE OF LANDSCAPED AREA | | | ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING MEETS THE REQUIREMENT OF 30 | | | PERCENT PER SECTION 94-443(E)(1) FOR THE BUILDING. | | | | | | COULD NOT LOCATE ON PLAN. CONSOLIDATE ALL LANDSCAPE | | | REQUIREMENTS IN ONE CHART. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. TAGS ARE NOT SHOWN ON LP-1, MAKE SURE | | | THEY ARE ADDED. | | | | | | 11. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE PLANT LIST: | | | ? SATISFIED. QUANTITY FOR SILVER BUTTONWOOD TREES IS | | | NOT INDICATED, AND SIZE MUST BE 12 FEET. | | | ? SATISFIED. CRAPE MYRTLE MUST BE 12 FEET. | | | ? ALL SPECIES LISTED UNDER TREES MUST MEET THE 12 FOOT | | | HEIGHT REQUIREMENT TO QUALIFY AS TREES, OTHERWISE MOVE | | | TO SHRUB CATEGORY. | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF DRAINAGE LINES ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH TREES | | | AND LANDSCAPING. RELOCATE UTILITY LOCATIONS OR EXPAND | | | LANDSCAPE AREAS TO ACCOMMODATE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH | | | LANDSCAPING. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED | | | VALVES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 14. SATISFIED. ROW OF PARKING SOUTH OF BUILDING SHOULD | | | BE MODIFIED TO BE 18 FEET LENGTH INCLUDING CURB AND | | | OVERHANG. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENT 4/16/21: | | | | | | 15. REMOVE TREE MITIGATION CREDITS FOR THE RELOCATED | | | PIGEON PLUM, LIVE OAKS AND SABAL PALMS AND RECALCULATE | | | TOTAL. MITIGATION CAN ONLY BE PROVIDED WITH NEWLY ADDED | | | MATERIAL. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENT 6/21/2021 | | | | | | 16. THE TREES AND PALMS THAT ARE LISTED AS TO BE | | | RELOCATED AND REMOVED MUST NO LONGER BE SHOWN ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. THIS INCLUDES USING A LIGHTER LINE | | | WEIGHT. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN IS TO SHOW THE FINAL | | | LANDSCAPE LAYOUT, SO THE TREES WOULD BE SHOWN WHERE | | | THEY WILL BE RELOCATED TO, NOT WHERE THEY CAME FROM. | | | | | | 17. THE PROPERTY LINE DIMENSIONS LISTED ON THE TREE | | | REQUIREMENTS CHART DO NOT MATCH THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON | | | THE SITE PLAN OR SURVEY. WHILE THEY ARE CLOSE, THE WEST | | | PROPERTY LINE WILL GO TO 215 FEET AND THUS REQUIRES AN | | | ADDITIONAL TREE. UPDATE THE CHART ACCORDINGLY. NOTE: IT | | | APPEARS THAT THE BUFFERS HAVE ENOUGH BUFFER TREES, EVEN | | | WITH THE ONE ADDITIONAL THAT IS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 18. LEAVING THE AREA WITH THE OLD DRIVEWAY CUT | | | VIOLATES THE 1 TREE EVERY 30 FEET AND THE HEDGE | | | REQUIRED WITHIN BUFFERS ADJACENT TO VEHICULAR USE | | | AREAS. THE LANDSCAPE PLANS MUST SHOW FULL COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE LANDSCAPE CODE. NOTE: THE LANDSCAPE TABLES | | | NEED TO BE UPDATED TO REFLECT MATERIAL THAT IS SHOW IN | | | THIS LOCATION. 9 BUTTON SIGNS CAN BE INCORPORATED INTO | | | THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER. | | | | | | 19. A SABAL PALM IS SHOWN LOCATED WITHIN THE REVISED | | | DRAINAGE EASEMENT ALONG THE BRANDSMART PROPERTY. THE | | | CITY DOES NOT PERMIT TREES TO BE PLANTED WITHIN CITY | | | DRAINAGE EASEMENTS. THE SABAL PALM WILL NEED TO BE | | | RELOCATED OUT OF THE EASEMENT. | | | | | | 20. THE LIVE OAKS ARE IN CLOSE PROXIMITY OF THE REVISED | | | DRAINAGE EASEMENT BY BRANDSMART PROPERTY ROOT BARRIER. | | | PLANTING LOCATION OF OAK SHOULD BE SHIFTED AWAY FROM | | | THE BARRIER IF POSSIBLE OR SELECT A SMALLER TREE | | | VARIETY FOR THE LOCATION. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-16-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
04-16-2021 |
Time |
17:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
04-16-2021 |
Time |
17:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-04-16 17:03:14 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: FLAMINGO CAR WASH CPD Z21020016 | | | APRIL 16, 2021 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN: | | | ? SATISFIED. ADD BRAZILIAN PEPPER TO LIST AND SHOW AS | | | REMOVE WITH NO MITIGATION REQUIRED. | | | ? SATISFIED. SHOW SQUARE FOOTAGE OF MITIGATION DUE FOR | | | EACH TREE TO BE REMOVED ON THE CHART. | | | ? SATISFIED. CHART SHOWS 2 RELOCATED LIVE OAKS, BUT 3 | | | ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 2. NOT SATISFIED. REQUIRED OPEN SPACE FOR CALCULATING | | | REQUIRED SHADE TREES AND FLOWERING TREES IS 40%. SHOW | | | THE CORRECT SQUARE FOOTAGE ON THE REQUIREMENTS CHART | | | AND RECALCULATE. | | | | | | 52925.4 SQ FT LOT, 40% IS 21170 SQ FT. 15 TREES | | | REQUIRED, 6 FLOWERING TREES AND 43 SHRUBS. CORRECT ON | | | CHART. BUFFER TREES AND PARKING LOT TREES CAN BE | | | COUNTED. SHORT ON FLOWERING TREES. | | | | | | 3. NOT SATISFIED. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE AND NUMBER OF | | | PALM SUBSTITUTIONS FOR REQUIRED TREES NOT EXCEEDING 35 | | | PERCENT PER SECTION 94-442 (D). | | | COULD NOT LOCATE ON PLAN, ADD TO TREE REQUIREMENT CHART | | | SO INFORMATION IS CONSOLIDATED. | | | | | | 4. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING | | | LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION | | | 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS. | | | COULD NOT LOCATE PLAN IN THE SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. BUFFER LENGTHS SHOWN ON CHART ON LP-2 DO | | | NOT MATCH SURVEY LENGTHS. REVISE AND SHOW NEW | | | CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PROVIDE REQUIRED BUFFER TREES AT ONE FOR | | | EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR EASTERN BUFFER OR | | | REQUEST A WAIVER. THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT NEEDS TO BE | | | CLARIFIED IF IT WILL BE USED OR NOT IN COORDINATION | | | WITH THE ADJACENT PROJECT. PERMISSION MAY BE SOUGHT FOR | | | INSTALLING THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AS AN ALTERNATIVE. | | | EXTRA TREES IN PARKING AREA WOULD HAVE TO BE PART OF | | | ANY WAIVER JUSTIFICATION. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. WESTERN BUFFER WILL NEED TO BE MODIFIED | | | TO INCORPORATE THE SIDEWALK CONNECTION AS DESCRIBED IN | | | THE ZONING COMMENTS. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. NORTHERN 5 FOOT BUFFER SHOULD BE CONSTANT | | | ACROSS THE ENTIRE LENGTH WITH ACCESS OPENINGS FOR | | | SIDEWALK ACCESS ONLY. SHADE TREES SHOULD BE CONSISTENT | | | WITH THE THEME FOR ALL PROPERTIES, THE ROYAL PALMS DO | | | NOT PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TREE CANOPY. | | | | | | 9. NOT SATISFIED. SHOW LINEAR FOOTAGE OF LANDSCAPED | | | AREA ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING MEETS THE REQUIREMENT OF | | | 30 PERCENT PER SECTION 94-443(E)(1) FOR THE BUILDING. | | | | | | COULD NOT LOCATE ON PLAN. CONSOLIDATE ALL LANDSCAPE | | | REQUIREMENTS IN ONE CHART. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. TAGS ARE NOT SHOWN ON LP-1, MAKE SURE | | | THEY ARE ADDED. | | | | | | 11. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE PLANT LIST: | | | ? NOT SATISFIED. QUANTITY FOR SILVER BUTTONWOOD TREES | | | IS NOT INDICATED, AND SIZE MUST BE 12 FEET. | | | ? NOT SATISFIED. CRAPE MYRTLE MUST BE 12 FEET. | | | ? ALL SPECIES LISTED UNDER TREES MUST MEET THE 12 FOOT | | | HEIGHT REQUIREMENT TO QUALIFY AS TREES, OTHERWISE MOVE | | | TO SHRUB CATEGORY. | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF DRAINAGE LINES ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH TREES | | | AND LANDSCAPING. RELOCATE UTILITY LOCATIONS OR EXPAND | | | LANDSCAPE AREAS TO ACCOMMODATE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH | | | LANDSCAPING. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED | | | VALVES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 14. SATISFIED. ROW OF PARKING SOUTH OF BUILDING SHOULD | | | BE MODIFIED TO BE 18 FEET LENGTH INCLUDING CURB AND | | | OVERHANG. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENT 4/16/21: | | | | | | 15. REMOVE TREE MITIGATION CREDITS FOR THE RELOCATED | | | PIGEON PLUM, LIVE OAKS AND SABAL PALMS AND RECALCULATE | | | TOTAL. MITIGATION CAN ONLY BE PROVIDED WITH NEWLY ADDED | | | MATERIAL. | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-10-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-10-2021 |
Time |
18:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-10-2021 |
Time |
18:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-10 18:03:18 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: FLAMINGO CAR WASH CPD Z21020016 | | | MARCH 10, 2021 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN: | | | ? ADD BRAZILIAN PEPPER TO LIST AND SHOW AS REMOVE WITH | | | NO MITIGATION REQUIRED. | | | ? SHOW SQUARE FOOTAGE OF MITIGATION DUE FOR EACH TREE | | | TO BE REMOVED ON THE CHART. | | | ? CHART SHOWS 2 RELOCATED LIVE OAKS, BUT 3 ARE SHOWN ON | | | THE PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 2. REQUIRED OPEN SPACE FOR CALCULATING REQUIRED SHADE | | | TREES AND FLOWERING TREES IS 40%. SHOW THE CORRECT | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE ON THE REQUIREMENTS CHART AND | | | RECALCULATE. | | | | | | 3. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE AND NUMBER OF PALM SUBSTITUTIONS | | | FOR REQUIRED TREES NOT EXCEEDING 35 PERCENT PER SECTION | | | 94-442 (D). | | | | | | 4. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING LANDSCAPE AREAS | | | COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-443(C)(3) AND | | | (4) AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 5. BUFFER LENGTHS SHOWN ON CHART ON LP-2 DO NOT MATCH | | | SURVEY LENGTHS. REVISE AND SHOW NEW CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 6. PROVIDE REQUIRED BUFFER TREES AT ONE FOR EVERY 30 | | | FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR EASTERN BUFFER OR REQUEST A | | | WAIVER. THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT NEEDS TO BE CLARIFIED IF | | | IT WILL BE USED OR NOT IN COORDINATION WITH THE | | | ADJACENT PROJECT. PERMISSION MAY BE SOUGHT FOR | | | INSTALLING THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AS AN ALTERNATIVE. | | | EXTRA TREES IN PARKING AREA WOULD HAVE TO BE PART OF | | | ANY WAIVER JUSTIFICATION. | | | | | | 7. WESTERN BUFFER WILL NEED TO BE MODIFIED TO | | | INCORPORATE THE SIDEWALK CONNECTION AS DESCRIBED IN THE | | | ZONING COMMENTS. | | | | | | 8. NORTHERN 5 FOOT BUFFER SHOULD BE CONSTANT ACROSS THE | | | ENTIRE LENGTH WITH ACCESS OPENINGS FOR SIDEWALK ACCESS | | | ONLY. SHADE TREES SHOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH THE THEME | | | FOR ALL PROPERTIES, THE ROYAL PALMS DO NOT PROVIDE THE | | | REQUIRED TREE CANOPY. | | | | | | 9. SHOW LINEAR FOOTAGE OF LANDSCAPED AREA ADJACENT TO | | | THE BUILDING MEETS THE REQUIREMENT OF 30 PERCENT PER | | | SECTION 94-443(E)(1) FOR THE BUILDING. | | | | | | 10. TAGS ARE NOT SHOWN ON LP-1, MAKE SURE THEY ARE | | | ADDED. | | | | | | 11. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE PLANT LIST: | | | ? QUANTITY FOR SILVER BUTTONWOOD TREES IS NOT | | | INDICATED, AND SIZE MUST BE 12 FEET. | | | ? CRAPE MYRTLE MUST BE 12 FEET. | | | | | | 12. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF DRAINAGE LINES ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH TREES AND | | | LANDSCAPING. RELOCATE UTILITY LOCATIONS OR EXPAND | | | LANDSCAPE AREAS TO ACCOMMODATE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 13. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS ON THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. PROVIDE | | | SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 14. ROW OF PARKING SOUTH OF BUILDING SHOULD BE MODIFIED | | | TO BE 18 FEET LENGTH INCLUDING CURB AND OVERHANG. | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-16-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
07-16-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
07-16-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-07-16 10:35:52 | NO FURTHER COMMENTS FROM DEPT OF PUBLIC WORKS. | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-16-2023 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
06-16-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
06-16-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-06-16 10:41:32 | PLEASE RELOCATE THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE TO THE ORIGINAL | | | LOCATION AND ORIENTATION SUBMITTED ON THE SITE PLAN, | | | SHEET SP-1, DATED 1/28/2028. THE PROPOSED DUMPSTER | | | ENLOSURE IS NOT FEASIBLE TO SAFELY ACCESS AND SERVICE | | | THE DUMPSTER WITH A FRONT LOADER VEHICLE. | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-01-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
04-01-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
04-01-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-04-01 11:25:09 | PLEASE PROVIDE THE REVISED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL, | | | SHEET SP-3 AND CIVIL ENG. PLAN SHEET 1, TO REFELCT THE | | | LATEST REVISION OF THE LATEST REVISION OF CITY OF WEST | | | PALM BEACH GENERAL CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE | | | STANDARD, GC-7 | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-08-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
03-08-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
03-08-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-08 09:16:27 | PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS: | | | 1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID | | | WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE AND TYPE OF | | | THE CONTAINER THAT WILL BE UTILIZED THAT WILL BE | | | UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE. | | | 2- DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL. FOR A FREESTANDING SITE | | | DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, THE ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE | | | LATEST REVISION OF CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL | | | CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE STANDARD, GC-7. | | | 3- AUTOTURN (DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE TIRES PATH) FOR | | | THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER TRUCK WITH THE | | | FOLLOWING SPECS: | | | - DUAL AXLES | | | - TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT | | | - TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT | | | - TURNING RADIUS: | | | - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT | | | - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT | | | - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-03-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
05-03-2021 |
Time |
16:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
05-03-2021 |
Time |
16:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-10-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
03-10-2021 |
Time |
22:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
03-10-2021 |
Time |
22:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-10 22:39:43 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. RELOCATE THE PROPOSED CONTROL STRUCTURE TO WITHIN | | | THE PROPERTY. | | | | | | 2. NO PROPOSED GRADES ARE PROVIDED ON THE CONCEPTUAL | | | ENGINEERING PLAN. MINIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF PAVED AREAS | | | FLOWING ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTY. | | | | | | 3. THE 12' DRAINAGE EASEMENT ALONG THE SOUTHEAST | | | PROPERTY LINE MAY BE IN USE BY THE BEST BUY PARCEL TO | | | CONVEY EXCESS STORMWATER RUNOFF TO THE DITCH ON THE | | | EAST SIDE OF EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE. REVIEW RECORDED | | | EASEMENT DOCUMENT TO DETERMINE IF THERE ARE | | | RESTRICTIONS OF CONSTRUCTING STRUCTURES WITHIN THE | | | DRAINAGE EASEMENT SUCH AS THE PROPOSED DUMPSTER | | | ENCLOSURE. | | | | | | 4. DETERMINE IF THE STORM PIPE FROM THE SOUTHEAST | | | CORNER OF THE BEST BUY LOT CONNECTS TO THE CATCH BASIN | | | INLET IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE CHINESE RESTAURANT | | | (CARWASH) SITE OR TO THE EXISTING MANHOLE IN THE | | | BRANDSMART DRIVEWAY OR GOES ALL THE WAY TO THE DITCH ON | | | THE EAST SIDE OF EXCUTIVE CENTER DRIVE AND SHOW THIS | | | PIPE ON THE CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN. | | | | | | 5. THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM IS TO BE DESIGNED TO BE SFWMD | | | ERP CRITERIA WATER QUALITY AND PEAK FLOW LIMITATIONS. | | | IF A PERIMETER BERM IS NEEDED TO CONTROL DISCHARGE UP | | | TO THE 25-YEAR 3-DAY DESIGN STORM, HOW WILL THIS | | | PERIMETER ELEVATION BE ACHIEVED AT THE DRIVEWAYS TO | | | OFFSITE PARCELS? HOW DOES THE PEAK 25-YEAR 3-DAY STAGE | | | COMPARE TO THE 25-YEAR 3-DAY PEAK STAGE OF ADJACENT | | | SITES? | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | | | | 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED | | | WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP MODIFICATION BEFORE | | | THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 4. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED WITH THE | | | ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 (O) | | | 561-351-0510 (M) | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-16-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
07-16-2021 |
Time |
09:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-07-16 09:09:57 | SEE PROPOSED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL IN DEVELOPER'S | | | APPROVAL LETTER: | | | | | | 2) CONDITION: PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE HEARING BEFORE | | | THE CITY COMMISSION, PROVIDE A SKETCH AND LEGAL | | | DESCRIPTION FOR THAT PORTION OF THE NEW DRAINAGE | | | EASEMENT WITHIN THE CAR WASH PROPERTY SO THAT THE CITY | | | CAN PREPARE THE AGREEMENT TO TERMINATE AND REDEDICATE | | | THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO REFLECT THE ACTUAL PIPE | | | LOCATION. | | | | | | 3) DEVELOPMENT REGULATION (DRAFT): PRIOR TO ZONING | | | APPROVAL OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE | | | SITE BASED ON THE CURRENTLY SUBMITTED PLANS, YOU WILL | | | NEED TO PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT BEST BUY HAS RELEASED | | | THEIR INTEREST IN THEIR CROSS-ACCESS EASEMENT. THE SITE | | | AND LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOW REQUIRED LANDSCAPE WITHIN THE | | | EASEMENT WHICH WOULD PREVENT ITS USE FOR CROSS-ACCESS | | | PURPOSES. IF BEST BUY DOES NOT RELEASE THEIR INTEREST | | | IN THE EASEMENT, THEN THE SITE WILL NEED TO BE | | | RECONFIGURED VIA A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT PRIOR | | | TO THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS. | | | | | | 4) DEVELOPMENT REGULATION (DRAFT): PRIOR TO CO OF THE | | | BUILDING, A PLAT FOR THE SITE MUST BE APPROVED BY THE | | | CITY AND RECORDED BY THE APPLICANT. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-23-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
06-23-2021 |
Time |
08:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-06-23 08:27:20 | 1. AFTER DISCUSSIONS WITH OUR LAW DEPT. AND PLANNING, | | | BEST BUY WILL NEED TO SIGN OFF ON THE PROPOSED | | | IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THEIR ACCESS EASEMENT. | | | 2. INSTEAD OF DEDICATION BY PLAT, THE NEW DRAINAGE | | | EASEMENT WILL BE BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE | | | A SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR THAT PORTION WITHIN | | | THE CAR WASH PROPERTY. | | | 3. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WILL BE THE REQUIREMENT TO | | | PLAT AND SIGN-OFF BY BEST BUY. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-26-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
04-26-2021 |
Time |
07:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-04-26 07:54:36 | 1. REPLAT WILL NEED TO INCLUDE DEDICATION OF PORTION OF | | | NEW DRAINAGE EASEMENT. | | | 2. THE ACCESS EASEMENT DOES NOT EXTEND WESTERLY TO | | | COVER THE NEW ENTRANCE. REVISED AGREEMENT WILL BE | | | REQUIRED. | | | 3. DATUM CONVERSION NEEDS TO BE SHOWN ON SURVEY AS | | | WELL. | | | 4. EASEMENT AGREEMENT PROVIDED IS NOT A RECORDED COPY. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-08-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
03-08-2021 |
Time |
07:54 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-08 07:57:55 | 1. PROPERTY WILL NEED TO BE PLATTED. APPLICATION FOR | | | MINOR SUBDIVISION IS MADE THROUGH PLANNING. | | | 2. ADD CONVERSION TO NGVD ON ALL PLANS. | | | 3. PROVIDE COPIES OF DRAINAGE AND INGRESS/EGRESS | | | EASEMENTS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-29-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
06-29-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-06-29 11:38:12 | ALL COMMENTS SATISFIED. | | | | | | | | | TRAFFIC COMMENTS | | | 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | 2) SATISFIED. UPDATE FIGURE 2 IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY SO | | | TO PROPERLY DEPICT THE DEVELOPER PROPOSED AND COUNTY | | | APPROVED RIGHT-IN/RIGHT OUT TURNING MOVEMENT | | | OPERATIONS. LATEST TRAFFIC STATEMENT SHOWS | | | NON-ALLOWABLE LEFT-TURN VEHICULAR VOLUMES FROM THE | | | DRIVEWAY TO EXECUTIVE CENTER DR | | | SITE COMMENTS | | | 3) SATISFIED. ESTIMATE VACUUM STALLS OCCUPANCY RATE | | | 4) SATISFIED. WHAT PRECLUDES VEHICLES NOT COMING FROM | | | THE CARWASH TO USE THE VACUUM STATIONS? | | | 5) SATISFIED. CONSIDER CHARGING FOR VACUUM STALLS OR | | | MONITOR USAGE AND OCCUPANCY | | | 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A 5 FEET SIDEWALK ON THE WEST | | | SIDE OF THE PROPERTY | | | 7) SATISFIED. MAKE SURE NORTH SIDE SIDEWALK IS AT THE | | | MINIMUM 5 FEET | | | 8) SATISFIED. TPS LETTER APPROVES ONE RIGHT-IN/RIGHT | | | OUT ACCESS DRIVEWAY ONTO EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE. | | | INSTALL A PORK-CHOP ISLAND AND CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE AT | | | SUCH LOCATION SO TO ENFORCE THE COUNTY APPROVED | | | RIGHT-IN/RIGHT OUT VEHICULAR MOVEMENTS RESTRICTION. | | | 9) SATISFIED. PROVIDE DESIGN DETAIL OF THE PORK-CHOP | | | ISLAND. SPECIFICALLY: IT MUST ALSO FUNCTION AS A | | | PEDESTRIAN REFUGE ISLAND. THUS, A SECTION OF THE MIDDLE | | | PORTION MUST BE AT LEVEL WITH THE DRIVEWAY APRON | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-23-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
06-23-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-06-23 20:57:08 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS | | | 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | 2) SATISFIED. UPDATE FIGURE 2 IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY SO | | | TO PROPERLY DEPICT THE DEVELOPER PROPOSED AND COUNTY | | | APPROVED RIGHT-IN/RIGHT OUT TURNING MOVEMENT | | | OPERATIONS. LATEST TRAFFIC STATEMENT SHOWS | | | NON-ALLOWABLE LEFT-TURN VEHICULAR VOLUMES FROM THE | | | DRIVEWAY TO EXECUTIVE CENTER DR | | | | | | SITE COMMENTS | | | 3) SATISFIED. ESTIMATE VACUUM STALLS OCCUPANCY RATE | | | 4) SATISFIED. WHAT PRECLUDES VEHICLES NOT COMING FROM | | | THE CARWASH TO USE THE VACUUM STATIONS? | | | 5) SATISFIED. CONSIDER CHARGING FOR VACUUM STALLS OR | | | MONITOR USAGE AND OCCUPANCY | | | 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A 5 FEET SIDEWALK ON THE WEST | | | SIDE OF THE PROPERTY | | | 7) SATISFIED. MAKE SURE NORTH SIDE SIDEWALK IS AT THE | | | MINIMUM 5 FEET | | | 8) SATISFIED. TPS LETTER APPROVES ONE RIGHT-IN/RIGHT | | | OUT ACCESS DRIVEWAY ONTO EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE. | | | INSTALL A PORK-CHOP ISLAND AND CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE AT | | | SUCH LOCATION SO TO ENFORCE THE COUNTY APPROVED | | | RIGHT-IN/RIGHT OUT VEHICULAR MOVEMENTS RESTRICTION. | | | 9) NEW COMMENT: PROVIDE DESIGN DETAIL OF THE PORK-CHOP | | | ISLAND. SPECIFICALLY: IT MUST ALSO FUNCTION AS A | | | PEDESTRIAN REFUGE ISLAND. THUS, A SECTION OF ITS MIDDLE | | | PORTION MUST BE AT LEVEL WITH THE DRIVEWAY APRON | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-30-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
04-30-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-04-30 15:08:36 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS | | | 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | 2) NOT SATISFIED. UPDATE FIGURE 2 IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY | | | SO TO PROPERLY DEPICT THE DEVELOPER PROPOSED AND COUNTY | | | APPROVED RIGHT-IN/RIGHT OUT TURNING MOVEMENT | | | OPERATIONS. LATEST TRAFFIC STATEMENT SHOWS | | | NON-ALLOWABLE LEFT-TURN VEHICULAR VOLUMES FROM THE | | | DRIVEWAY TO EXECUTIVE CENTER DR | | | | | | SITE COMMENTS | | | 3) SATISFIED. ESTIMATE VACUUM STALLS OCCUPANCY RATE | | | 4) SATISFIED. WHAT PRECLUDES VEHICLES NOT COMING FROM | | | THE CARWASH TO USE THE VACUUM STATIONS? | | | 5) SATISFIED. CONSIDER CHARGING FOR VACUUM STALLS OR | | | MONITOR USAGE AND OCCUPANCY | | | 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A 5 FEET SIDEWALK ON THE WEST | | | SIDE OF THE PROPERTY | | | 7) SATISFIED. MAKE SURE NORTH SIDE SIDEWALK IS AT THE | | | MINIMUM 5 FEET | | | 8) NOT SATISFIED. TPS LETTER APPROVES ONE | | | RIGHT-IN/RIGHT OUT ACCESS DRIVEWAY ONTO EXECUTIVE | | | CENTER DRIVE. INSTALL A PORK-CHOP ISLAND AND | | | CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE AT SUCH LOCATION SO TO ENFORCE | | | THE COUNTY APPROVED RIGHT-IN/RIGHT OUT VEHICULAR | | | MOVEMENTS RESTRICTION. | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-10-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
03-10-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-10 18:07:53 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS | | | 1) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | | | | SITE COMMENTS | | | 2) ESTIMATE VACUUM STALLS OCCUPANCY RATE | | | 3) WHAT PRECLUDES VEHICLES NOT COMING FROM THE CARWASH | | | TO USE THE VACUUM STATIONS? | | | 4) CONSIDER CHARGING FOR VACUUM STALLS OR MONITOR USAGE | | | AND OCCUPANCY | | | 5) PROVIDE A 5 FEET SIDEWALK ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE | | | PROPERTY | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-16-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
07-15-2021 |
Time |
11:46 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
07-14-2021 |
Time |
15:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-07-16 09:15:02 | 1) CONDITION: PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE HEARING BEFORE | | | THE CITY COMMISSION, PROVIDE THE COPY OF THE COMCAST | | | LETTER OF NO OBJECTION. | | | | | | 2) CONDITION: PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE HEARING BEFORE | | | THE CITY COMMISSION, PROVIDE A SKETCH AND LEGAL | | | DESCRIPTION FOR THAT PORTION OF THE NEW DRAINAGE | | | EASEMENT WITHIN THE CAR WASH PROPERTY SO THAT THE CITY | | | CAN PREPARE THE AGREEMENT TO TERMINATE AND REDEDICATE | | | THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO REFLECT THE ACTUAL PIPE | | | LOCATION. | | | | | | 3) DEVELOPMENT REGULATION (DRAFT): PRIOR TO ZONING | | | APPROVAL OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE | | | SITE BASED ON THE CURRENTLY SUBMITTED PLANS, YOU WILL | | | NEED TO PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT BEST BUY HAS RELEASED | | | THEIR INTEREST IN THEIR CROSS-ACCESS EASEMENT. THE SITE | | | AND LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOW REQUIRED LANDSCAPE WITHIN THE | | | EASEMENT WHICH WOULD PREVENT ITS USE FOR CROSS-ACCESS | | | PURPOSES. IF BEST BUY DOES NOT RELEASE THEIR INTEREST | | | IN THE EASEMENT, THEN THE SITE WILL NEED TO BE | | | RECONFIGURED VIA A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT PRIOR | | | TO THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS. | | | | | | 4) DEVELOPMENT REGULATION (DRAFT): PRIOR TO CO OF THE | | | BUILDING, A PLAT FOR THE SITE MUST BE APPROVED BY THE | | | CITY AND RECORDED BY THE APPLICANT. | | | | | | 5) DEVELOPMENT REGULATION: THE MENU SIGNS MAY INCLUDE | | | THE BUSINESS NAME AND/OR LOGO; HOWEVER, THE NAME/LOGO | | | MUST BE POSITIONED SO AS NOT TO FACE OR BE VISIBLE FROM | | | EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE. | | | | | | 6) DEVELOPMENT REGULATION: SEATING ALONG EXECUTIVE | | | CENTER DRIVE MUST MEET CRIME PREVENTION THROUGH | | | ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN (CPTED) STANDARDS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-21-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
06-21-2021 |
Time |
16:58 |
Rev Time |
3.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
06-21-2021 |
Time |
16:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-06-21 16:59:13 | CASE NO. PB 1060NN JUNE 21, 2021 REVIEW | | | FLAMINGO CAR WASH II | | | 879 WEST EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE | | | | | | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE | | | (3) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT | | | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS | | | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | - UPON STAFF REVIEW OF THE RESUBMITTED PLANS AND | | | DETERMINATION THAT THE NEW PLANS HAVE MET THE COMMENTS, | | | YOU WILL BE SCHEDULED FOR THE NEXT AVAILABLE PLANNING | | | BOARD MEETING. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE ADDITIONAL | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600). | | | | | | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION | | | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS. | | | | | | 1) THE TREES AND PALMS THAT ARE LISTED AS TO BE | | | RELOCATED AND REMOVED MUST NO LONGER BE SHOWN ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. SHOWING THEM WITH A LOWER LINE WEIGHT | | | IS NOT PERMITTED. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN IS TO SHOW THE | | | FINAL LANDSCAPE LAYOUT, SO THE TREES WOULD BE SHOWN | | | WHERE THEY WILL BE RELOCATED TO, NOT WHERE THEY CAME | | | FROM. | | | | | | 2) THE PROPERTY LINE DIMENSIONS LISTED ON THE TREE | | | REQUIREMENTS CHART DO NOT MATCH THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON | | | THE SITE PLAN OR SURVEY. WHILE THEY ARE CLOSE, THE WEST | | | PROPERTY LINE WILL GO TO 215 FEET AND THUS REQUIRES AN | | | ADDITIONAL TREE. UPDATE THE CHART ACCORDINGLY. NOTE: IT | | | APPEARS THAT THE BUFFERS HAVE ENOUGH BUFFER TREES, EVEN | | | WITH THE ONE ADDITIONAL THAT IS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 3) LEAVING THE AREA WITH THE OLD DRIVEWAY CUT VIOLATES | | | THE 1 TREE EVERY 30 FEET AND THE HEDGE REQUIRED WITHIN | | | BUFFERS ADJACENT TO VEHICULAR USE AREAS. THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLANS MUST SHOW FULL COMPLIANCE WITH THE LANDSCAPE | | | CODE. NOTE: THE LANDSCAPE TABLES NEED TO BE UPDATED TO | | | REFLECT MATERIAL THAT IS SHOW IN THIS LOCATION. | | | | | | 4) A SABAL PALM IS SHOWN LOCATED WITHIN THE REVISED | | | DRAINAGE EASEMENT ALONG THE BRANDSMART PROPERTY. THE | | | CITY DOES NOT PERMIT TREES TO BE PLANTED WITHIN CITY | | | DRAINAGE EASEMENTS. THE SABAL PALM WILL NEED TO BE | | | RELOCATED OUT OF THE EASEMENT. | | | | | | 5) PROVIDE A COPY OF THE COMCAST LETTER OF NO | | | OBJECTION. | | | | | | 6) WILL THE MENU SIGNS INCLUDE THE BUSINESS NAME OR | | | LOGO ON THEM? IF SO, THEN THIS WILL NEED TO BE | | | SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. | | | | | | 7) CONDITION (DRAFT): PRIOR TO CO OF THE CAR WASH | | | BUILDING, THE APPLICANT WILL WORK WITH THE CITY TO | | | TERMINATE AND REDEDICATE THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT IN THE | | | SOUTHWEST PORTION OF THE SITE TO REFLECT THE ACTUAL | | | PIPE LOCATION. | | | | | | 8) CONDITION (DRAFT): THE BENCHES PROPOSED ALONG | | | EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE MUST MET CRIME PREVENTION | | | THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN (CPTED) STANDARDS. | | | | | | 9) CONDITION (DRAFT): THE CITY HAS PLOTTED, AND YOUR | | | SURVEYOR HAS VERIFIED, THAT THE CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT | | | THAT BEST BUY HAS AN INTEREST IN AS LAID OUT IN THE | | | EASEMENT WITH COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS CROSSES THE | | | CAR WASH SITE. BASED ON THE LATEST PROPOSAL, THE | | | DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE AND REQUIRED BUFFER LANDSCAPE WOULD | | | BLOCK BEST BUY'S ABILITY TO UTILIZE THE EASEMENT TO | | | CONSTRUCT ACCESS TO EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE. PRIOR TO | | | ZONING APPROVAL OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS FOR DEVELOPMENT | | | OF THE SITE BASED ON THE CURRENTLY SUBMITTED PLANS, YOU | | | WILL NEED TO PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT BEST BUY HAS | | | RELEASED THEIR INTEREST IN THE EASEMENT. IF BEST BUY | | | DOES NOT RELEASE THEIR INTEREST IN THE EASEMENT, THEN | | | THE SITE WILL NEED TO BE RECONFIGURED VIA A PLANNED | | | DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-26-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
04-26-2021 |
Time |
10:22 |
Rev Time |
6.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
04-23-2021 |
Time |
09:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-04-26 10:23:11 | CASE NO. PB 1060NN | | | FLAMINGO CAR WASH II | | | 879 WEST EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE | | | | | | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR | | | (4) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT | | | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS | | | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | - UPON STAFF REVIEW OF THE RESUBMITTED PLANS AND | | | DETERMINATION THAT THE NEW PLANS HAVE MET THE COMMENTS, | | | YOU WILL BE SCHEDULED FOR THE NEXT AVAILABLE PLANNING | | | BOARD MEETING. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS | | | FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY MAY 11, 2021), | | | THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER | | | ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE ADDITIONAL | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600). | | | | | | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION | | | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS. | | | | | | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: YOU NEED TO SHOW THE CORRECT TRAFFIC | | | MARKINGS ON THE SITE PLAN (EXAMPLE STOP BAR AND SIGN | | | FOR VEHICLES EXITING THE BRANDSMART/BJS SITE), EVEN | | | THOUGH THEY WILL NOT NEED TO BE INSTALLED UNTIL THE | | | CONNECTION IS COMPLETED. | | | | | | 2) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE A COPY OF THE FPU, FPL AND | | | COMCAST LETTERS OF NO OBJECTION. | | | | | | 3) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE PAY STRUCTURE | | | ELEVATIONS. THE SOUTHERN WALL CONTINUES TO BE SHOWN | | | ENCROACHING INTO THE REQUIRED FIVE (5) FOOT SIDE | | | SETBACK, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED. PROVIDE THE DIMENSION | | | OF THE ARCHITECTURAL OVERHANG FROM THE BUILDING WALL. | | | THE OVERHANG MAY NOT ENCROACH MORE THEN THREE (3) FEET | | | INTO THE REQUIRED SETBACK. | | | | | | 4) THE LANDSCAPE AND SITE PLANS NEED TO SHOW THE | | | REVISED LOCATION OF THE CONTROL STRUCTURE AND OUTFALL | | | PIPE AND THE CONNECTION TO THE STORM MANHOLE ON THE | | | BRANDSMART PROPERTY. NOTE: THE LANDSCAPE PLAN NEEDS TO | | | SHOW ALL THE UNDERGROUND UTILITY AND DRAINAGE LOCATIONS | | | (TO INCLUDE THE EXTENT OF THE EASEMENT) SO THAT STAFF | | | CAN VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NOT CONFLICTS AND THE | | | PROPOSED ROOT BARRIERS WILL BE EFFECTIVE. IF POSSIBLE, | | | THE CONTROL STRUCTURE AND OUTFALL PIPES SHOULD BE | | | LOCATED OUTSIDE OF LANDSCAPE AREAS TO PERMIT TREE ROOT | | | GROWTH. | | | | | | 5) THE CIVIL PLAN CONTINUES TO SHOW THE CITY'S OLD, TOO | | | SMALL OPENING, DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. PLEASE REMOVE OR | | | REPLACE. | | | | | | 6) CURRENTLY THE SITE IS ONLY PERMITTED TO HAVE A | | | RESTAURANT, WHICH IS THE REASON THAT YOU NEED TO AMEND | | | THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO PERMIT THE CAR WASH USE | | | (FALLS UNDER THE MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL SALES AND SERVICE | | | CATEGORY. STAFF IS WONDERING WHY YOU HAVE INCLUDED | | | MOTOR VEHICLE REPAIR, LIGHT, AS A PERMITTED USE. THIS | | | ITEM NEEDS FURTHER DISCUSSION. | | | | | | 7) PROVIDE THE DIMENSION OF THE ARCHITECTURAL OVERHANG | | | FROM THE BUILDING WALL OF THE CAR WASH BUILDING. IT | | | SCALES AT TWO (2) FEET, WHICH WOULD STILL MEET CODE | | | SINCE THE BUILDING WALL IS SHOWN AT SEVEN (7) AT ITS | | | CLOSEST POINT TO THE PROPERTY LINE. REMEMBER, THE | | | OVERHANG MAY NOT ENCROACH MORE THAN THREE (3) FEET INTO | | | THE REQUIRED SETBACK. | | | | | | 8) PROVIDE NOTARIZED VERIFICATION FROM THE NEIGHBORING | | | PROPERTY OWNER AT 1840 PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD THAT | | | HE WILL EXTEND THE ACCESS EASEMENT TO THE NEW DRIVEWAY | | | LOCATION. | | | | | | 9) CONDITION (DRAFT): PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE FOR THE | | | PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT THE DRIVEWAY CONNECTION TO THE | | | INTERNAL DRIVE ON THE GAS STATION PARCEL, PROVIDE | | | VERIFICATION THAT THE ACCESS EASEMENT HAS BEEN MODIFIED | | | TO REACH YOUR PROPOSED DRIVEWAY. | | | | | | 10) CONDITION (DRAFT): PRIOR TO CO OF THE CAR WASH | | | BUILDING, THE APPLICANT WILL WORK WITH THE CITY TO | | | TERMINATE AND REDEDICATE THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT IN THE | | | SOUTHWEST PORTION OF THE SITE TO REFLECT THE ACTUAL | | | PIPE LOCATION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-10-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
03-10-2021 |
Time |
10:45 |
Rev Time |
8.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
03-08-2021 |
Time |
15:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-10 10:45:47 | CASE NO. PB 1060NN | | | FLAMINGO CAR WASH II | | | 879 WEST EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE | | | | | | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR | | | (4) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT | | | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS | | | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND | | | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, | | | MARCH 26, 2021, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE | | | MAY 18, 2021 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS | | | FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY MAY 11, 2021), | | | THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER | | | ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600). | | | | | | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION | | | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS. | | | | | | 1) THE CHINESE RESTAURANT SITE IS PART OF WHAT WAS | | | PARCEL 3 OF THE PALM BEACH LAKES INN AND GOLF COURSE | | | CPD AND COVERED BY ORDINANCE NO. 2622-93. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE A RESPONSE/STATUS UPDATE TO THE CONDITIONS | | | LISTED IN SECTION 5, SUBSECTIONS 3, 7, 8 AND 9 OF | | | ORDINANCE NO. 2622-93. | | | | | | 2) EVEN THOUGH THE TRAFFIC STATEMENT FOR THE | | | REDEVELOPMENT SHOWS A REDUCTION IN TRIPS FOR THE | | | MAJORITY OF THE TESTED TIME FRAMES, YOU ARE STILL | | | REQUIRED TO SUBMIT AN APPROVED TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE | | | STANDARDS LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY ENGINEERING. AN | | | APPROVAL LETTER IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO SCHEDULING FOR | | | PLANNING BOARD. | | | | | | 3) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING A COPY OF THE EASEMENT WITH | | | COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS. IT INDICATES THAT BEST BUY | | | HAS AN INTEREST IN THE CROSS ACCESS, SPECIFICALLY A | | | DRIVE TO EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE. PLEASE PROVIDE | | | VERIFICATION THAT BEST BUY HAS RELEASED THEIR INTEREST | | | IN THE EASEMENT. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS THE DUMPSTER AND | | | LANDSCAPING OBSTRUCTING BEST BUY FROM UTILIZING THE | | | EASEMENT. PLEASE NOTE THAT REGARDLESS OF WHAT IS STATED | | | IN THE EASEMENT, BEST BUY HAS NO RIGHTS TO THE | | | INSTALLATION OF AN OFF PREMISE SIGN, WHICH WOULD BE IN | | | VIOLATION OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS. | | | | | | 4) THANK YOU FOR SHOWING THE CROSS ACCESS DRIVEWAY WITH | | | THE BRANDSMART/BJS SITE CONSTRUCTED TO THE PROPERTY | | | LINE. NOTE: THE RECENT BRANDSMART/BJS RESUBMITTAL DID | | | NOT SHOW THEIR SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY LINED UP WITH THE | | | FLAMINGO PROPOSED LOCATION. STAFF WILL BE MAKING THAT | | | COMMENT ON THEIR REVIEW; HOWEVER, YOU WILL NEED TO SHOW | | | THE CORRECT TRAFFIC MARKINGS ON THE SITE PLAN (EXAMPLE | | | STOP BAR AND SIGN FOR VEHICLES EXITING THE | | | BRANDSMART/BJS SITE), EVEN THOUGH THEY WILL NOT NEED TO | | | BE INSTALLED UNTIL THE CONNECTION IS COMPLETED. | | | | | | 5) PROVIDE A COPY OF THE WARRANTY DEED AND THE FPU, FPL | | | AND COMCAST LETTERS OF NO OBJECTION. | | | | | | 6) PROVIDE COPIES OF ALL THE EASEMENTS/RESTRICTIONS | | | AFFECTING THE SITE. A QUICK REVIEW OF THE TWO 30 FOOT | | | I.E.E. LISTED ON THE SURVEY DO NOT SHOW THE EASEMENT | | | EXTENDING TO THE PROPOSED NEW ACCESS CONNECTION TO THE | | | DRIVEWAY BETWEEN THE GAS STATION AND THE RESTAURANT | | | PARCEL. PLEASE PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT YOU HAVE | | | ACCESS RIGHTS TO THE PARCEL AS SHOWN. | | | | | | 7) PLEASE CONSIDER MAKING THE EMPLOYEE/ADA PARKING | | | SPACES ONLY NINE (9) FEET WIDE AND 18 FEET DEEP | | | INCLUDING THE TWO (2) FOOT OVERHANG TO REDUCE THE | | | AMOUNT OF PAVEMENT WITHIN THE PARKING AREA. THESE | | | SPACES DO NOT NEED THE EXTRA SIZE THAT THE VACUUM | | | SPACES REQUIRE. | | | | | | 8) THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT STATES THAT THE SIDEWALK | | | ALONG EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE WILL BE WIDENED TO AN 8-10 | | | FOOT MULTIPURPOSE PATH; HOWEVER, THE SITE PLAN CALLS | | | OUT A 7-9 FOOT WIDTH THAT MATCHES THE EXISTING | | | CONDITION SHOWN ON THE SURVEY. PLEASE EXPLAIN OR AMEND | | | THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. | | | | | | 9) THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS REQUIRE | | | THAT ANY SOURCE OF ILLUMINATION LOCATED WITHIN A | | | COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT SHALL NOT | | | EXCEED ONE FOOTCANDLE AT OR BEYOND THE BOUNDARIES OF | | | SUCH DEVELOPMENT. THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHOWS THIS | | | MAXIMUM BEING EXCEEDED ALONG EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE. | | | THE BOUNDARY WITH BEST BUY DOES NOT MATCH THE SITE | | | PLAN, BUT STILL APPEARS TO EXCEED THE PERMITTED LIGHT | | | LEVELS. | | | | | | 10) PROVIDE THE DETAILS OF THE PAY LANE STRUCTURE. THE | | | POSTS ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE ARE LOCATED | | | WITHIN THE REQUIRED FIVE (5) FOOT SIDE SETBACK, WHICH | | | IS NOT PERMITTED. | | | | | | 11) THE PROPOSED BICYCLE RACK NEEDS TO HAVE A SUPPORT | | | POST DIMENSION BETWEEN 22 AND 24 INCHES AS OPPOSED TO | | | THE 14.375 INCHES SPECIFIED ON THE BICYCLE RACK DETAIL. | | | THE NARROW DIMENSION IS NOT ADEQUATE TO APPROPRIATELY | | | SECURE A BICYCLE. | | | | | | 12) PROVIDE THE BICYCLE PAD DIMENSIONS ON THE OVERALL | | | SITE OR CIVIL PLAN AS WELL AS THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE | | | PLAN. | | | | | | 13) THE FLAG POLE MAY NOT EXCEED 50 FEET IN HEIGHT AND | | | MAY NOT FLY A FLAG WITH THE NAME OR LOGO OF THE | | | BUSINESS. | | | | | | 14) NONE OF THE PLANT MATERIALS ARE LABELED ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. STAFF CANNOT VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | | LANDSCAPE CODE REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 15) THE EAST AND SOUTH BUFFERS DO NOT APPEAR TO MEET | | | THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF REQUIRED TREES NOR DO THEY MEET | | | THE REQUIRED SPACING OF THE TREES DUE TO THE DRAINAGE | | | EASEMENTS. YOU HAVE NOT DEMONSTRATED COMPLIANCE WITH | | | THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 16) FREESTANDING SIGNS ARE REQUIRED TO BE A MINIMUM OF | | | 24 FEET FROM ADJOINING LOT LINES. THE MONUMENT SIGN | | | LOCATION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THIS SETBACK REQUIREMENT. | | | WHAT IS THE PROPOSED HEIGHT OF THE SIGN? | | | | | | 17) DIRECTIONAL SIGNS ARE REQUIRED TO BE A MINIMUM OF | | | 20 FEET FROM ANOTHER LOT LINE. THE PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL | | | SIGNS DO NOT MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. NO DETAILS ON THE | | | DIRECTIONAL SIGNS WERE PROVIDED TO VERIFY CODE | | | COMPLIANCE. NOTE: DEPENDING ON WHAT THE SIGNS ARE FOR, | | | THEY MAY ACTUALLY BE PARKING AREA INSTRUCTIONAL SIGNS, | | | WHICH HAVE DIFFERENT SETBACK PROVISIONS. | | | | | | 18) THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM | | | CITY STANDARDS. | | | | | | 19) THE CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN SHOWS THE PROPOSED | | | CONTROL STRUCTURE AND OUTFALL PIPE WITHIN THE LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFER ON THE BRANDSMART/BJS SITE. THIS NEEDS TO BE | | | RELOCATED TO UNDERNEATH A PAVED AREA SO AS NOT TO | | | IMPACT REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFERS. | | | | | | 20) WHAT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS? WHAT | | | IS THE OPPORTUNITY TO ABANDON, REVISE OR RELOCATE THEM? | | | THE NON-EXCLUSIVE OUTFALL DRAINAGE EASEMENT RECORDED IN | | | ORB 11870 PG 300 INCLUDES PROVISIONS FOR TERMINATION OF | | | THE EASEMENTS OF PORTIONS OF EASEMENTS THAT ARE NO | | | LONGER NEEDED. | | | | | | 21) TURN OFF THE TREE DISPOSITION LAYER ON THE SITE | | | PLAN. THIS NEEDS TO BE SHOWN ON A SEPARATE PLAN AS IT | | | IMPEDES THE READABILITY OF THE SITE PLAN. | | | | | | 22) PLEASE CONSIDER USING A PERVIOUS PAVEMENT | | | UNDERNEATH THE VACUUM AREA PARKING SPOTS. | | | | | | 23) STAFF HAS NOTED THAT THERE IS NO INTERNAL | | | PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION BETWEEN THE MARATHON GAS | | | STATION, THE PROPOSED FLAMINGO CAR WASH SITE AND THE | | | BEST BUY. IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH THE PEDESTRIAN | | | CIRCULATION SITE DESIGN QUALITATIVE DEVELOPMENT | | | STANDARDS, YOU WILL NEED TO PROVIDE A FIVE (5) FOOT | | | WIDE SIDEWALK ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE OF THE SITE | | | FROM EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE TO THE BEST BUY PROPERTY | | | LINE. THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER WOULD BE SHIFTED TO THE | | | SIDEWALK AND YOUR EXISTING CURB LINE. | | | | | | 24) THE BENCHES ALONG EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE NEED TO | | | MEET CPTED STANDARDS. | | | | | | 25) PLEASE CLARIFY THE INTENT OF THE USE CHART THAT IS | | | INCLUDED WITH THE SITE PLAN. | | | | | | 26) IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FOR A UNIFORM STREETSCAPE ON | | | THIS SIDE OF EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE AND PROVIDE SHADE, | | | THE NORTHERN BUFFER TREES NEED TO BE GUMBO LIMBO TREES. | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |