 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z21010029
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z21010029 |
| Review Stop |
AIPP |
ART IN PUBLIC PLACES |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
01-29-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
scwelter |
Date |
01-29-2021 |
Time |
14:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
scwelter |
Date |
01-29-2021 |
Time |
14:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-06-16 13:53:56 | PLEASE PROVIDE CIVIL PLANS FOR REVIEW. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-10-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
02-10-2021 |
Time |
20:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
02-10-2021 |
Time |
20:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-02-10 20:27:22 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AN ASBESTOS | | | SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT | | | REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963, | | | OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 3. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR | | | THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, | | | AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 4. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND | | | OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF | | | OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE | | | VERIFIED. | | | | | | 5. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, | | | FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, | | | GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, | | | SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 6. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND | | | CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF | | | CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. | | | | | | 7. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER | | | AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY, | | | INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE | | | CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION | | | THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY. | | | | | | 8. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT | | | WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL | | | HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION | | | OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, | | | CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT | | | (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 9. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT | | | TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE | | | ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP | | | ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC | | | PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-08-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
09-08-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
09-08-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-09-08 07:09:55 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD | | | CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, | | | PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]: | | | | | | DIDN?T SEE PRIOR COMMENTS ON RESPONSE LETTER: | | | -PARKING FEATURES ON NORTH SIDE OF BISCAYNE DR BETWEEN | | | FIRE HYDRANT AND GATE DO NOT MATCH ON CIVIL PLANS AND | | | SITE PLANS. PLEASE UPDATE ALL PLANS SO THEY MATCH. | | | -DID NOT SEE UPDATED LANDSCAPING PLAN IN SUBMITTAL | | | PACKAGE. IS THE PLAN FROM 5/28/21 STILL ACCURATE? | | | -BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES MAY NOT BE UNDERGROUNDED. | | | NEW COMMENTS: | | | -AT FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, REVISE UTILITY | | | EASEMENT BOUNDARIES TO INCLUDE EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT, | | | EXISTING WATER METER FOR SCHOOL, AND EXISTING 4 INCH CA | | | WM | | | | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MICHAEL TECHNOW, | | | PROJECT ENG., WPB PUBLIC UTIL. 561-494-1047, | | | [email protected] : | | | | | | - FIRE HYDRANT VALVE NEEDS TO BE CLOSER. | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE PROFILE FOR PROPOSED AND EXISTING | | | UTILITIES. | | | - PLEASE SHOW DRY UTILITIES. | | | - THE 4? WM CANNOT BE SHUT DOWN, PLEASE SPECIFY HOW THE | | | CONNECTION WILL BE MADE WHILE MAINTAINING SERVICE. | | | - REPLACE CAS PIPE IN ROW. | | | - MAINTAIN HORIZONTAL SEPARATION FROM 20? WM (NOTE | | | HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE ON PLANS). | | | - ADD NOTE TO SUPPORT EXISTING 20? WM, RESTRAIN AS | | | REQUIRE, EXERCISE CAUTION. | | | | | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | CONCERNS, THANKS. | | | RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES | | | DEPARTMENT | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 [email protected] | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-21-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
07-21-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
07-21-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-07-21 12:01:57 | PLANS RECEIVED 8/3/2021. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE | | | FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, | | | WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR | | | [email protected]: | | | | | | -PARKING FEATURES ON NORTH SIDE OF BISCAYNE DR BETWEEN | | | FIRE HYDRANT AND GATE DO NOT MATCH ON CIVIL PLANS AND | | | SITE PLANS. PLEASE UPDATE ALL PLANS SO THEY MATCH. | | | -DID NOT SEE UPDATED LANDSCAPING PLAN IN SUBMITTAL | | | PACKAGE. IS THE PLAN FROM 5/28/21 STILL ACCURATE? | | | -BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES MAY NOT BE UNDERGROUNDED. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-16-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
06-16-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
06-16-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-07-12 08:17:23 | 6/3 SUBMITTAL DID NOT CONTAIN CIVIL/ENGINEERING PLANS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-26-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
03-26-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
03-26-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-26 13:52:44 | COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJ. COORD., ENG. | | | SERVICES, [email protected], 561-494-1098: | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE CCTV OF EXISTING SANITARY AND STORMWATER | | | INFRASTRUCTURE IN BISCAYNE DR. ALONG PROJECT FRONTAGE | | | (REQUIREMENT OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL). | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD | | | CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, | | | PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]: | | | | | | -PLEASE VERIFY LOCATION OF STM MANHOLE ON CLAREMORE IS | | | CORRECT. | | | | | | -CANNOT FIND THE PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF UTILITY | | | EASEMENTS ON BISCAYNE DRAWN AND LABELED ON WATER PLAN. | | | PLEASE UPDATE PLAN BEFORE NEXT RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL: LABEL ALL WATER MAIN | | | GATE VALVES ON BISCAYNE DR., VERIFY IF THE 20 INCH | | | WATER MAIN IS CAST IRON OR ASBESTOS, SHOW AND LABEL ALL | | | WATER MAIN VALVES FOR 20 INCH WATER MAIN, VERIFY IF ANY | | | EXISTING SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE AROUND BUILDING TO BE | | | DEMOLISHED NEAR CLAREMORE. | | | | | | -SITE PLAN SHOWS THAT ROLLING GATE HAS A KEYPAD IN | | | CONJUNCTION WITH REQUEST TO BRIAN CARROLL, BUT PRIOR | | | COMMENT RESPONSE SAID KNOX BOX. PLEASE CONFIRM PUBLIC | | | UTILITIES WILL HAVE A KEYPAD GATE CODE FOR 24/7 | | | MAINTENANCE ACCESS INSTEAD OF KNOX BOX. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-05-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
02-05-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
02-05-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-02-05 13:42:48 | 1. THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF | | | REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY | | | AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND | | | WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. TO VIEW | | | DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER | | | ENGINEERING RELATED DOCUMENTS, OPEN A BROWSER IN CHROME | | | AND GO TO: WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGDOCS . TO LOGIN, UNDER | | | ?EMAIL? ENTER [email protected] ; UNDER ?PASSWORD? ENTER | | | SIMPLE321# | | | THERE ARE 4 PAGES OF AVAILABLE ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS | | | FOR YOUR USE. | | | 2. CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, | | | FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08, ADOPTED | | | SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18) CHAPTER 90 | | | UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. SEC. 90-7. | | | POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER SERVICE | | | FACILITIES OF THE CITY: | | | THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE | | | CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY | | | BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS, | | | BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION. | | | 3. AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR | | | MORE INFORMATION, OPEN A BROWSER IN CHROME AND GO TO: | | | WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGDOCS .TO LOGIN, UNDER ?EMAIL? ENTER | | | [email protected] ; UNDER ?PASSWORD? ENTER SIMPLE321# | | | CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL IS ON PAGE 4. | | | 4. PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY | | | OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC | | | RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF | | | YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE | | | MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL | | | IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT | | | [email protected] OR 561-494-1040 FOR FURTHER | | | ASSISTANCE. | | | 5. PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS | | | OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES, | | | INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND | | | SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, | | | METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE | | | SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING | | | GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, | | | ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL | | | INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER | | | LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE | | | PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN | | | VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. | | | PLEASE SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT | | | MATERIAL. ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL | | | EXISTING AND PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, | | | INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & | | | TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL | | | UTILITY CROSSINGS. | | | 6. CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY | | | ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY | | | ROW. | | | 7. PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE | | | DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB | | | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION). | | | 8. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND | | | PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM | | | AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE | | | PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER. | | | 9. PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND | | | STORMWATER ALONG BISCAYNE DR. | | | 10. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND | | | IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED | | | AREAS. | | | 11. CLEARLY SHOW PROPOSED UTILITY CONNECTIONS FOR WATER | | | AND SEWER TO PROPOSED NEW BUILDING. | | | 12. PLEASE LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE | | | APPLICABLE. | | | 13. PLEASE PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED | | | LOCATION OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION. | | | 14. COORDINATE WITH MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE | | | SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING | | | PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT | | | HIM AT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected] | | | 15. PROVIDE DEDICATED UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS | | | FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD | | | CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, | | | PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]: | | | | | | -NEED UTILITY EASEMENTS GRANTED FOR ALL CITY UTILITY | | | INFRASTRUCTURE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY INCLUDING THE WATER | | | AND SEWER MAINS. PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL ON CIVIL | | | ENGINEERING PLANS. | | | | | | -SHOW AND LABEL THE EXISTING METERED WATER SERVICES FOR | | | THE SCHOOL WHICH ARE LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF | | | BISCAYNE DR. | | | | | | -SITE PLAN SHOWS WHAT APPEARS TO BE AN TELEPHONE POLE | | | IN THE MIDDLE OF THE LOADING DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE. | | | | | | -SHOW AND LABEL ALL EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTS ON OR AROUND | | | THE PROPERTY. THERE IS AT LEAST ONE NEAR THE | | | INTERSECTION OF BISCAYNE AND DIXIE WHICH IS NOT | | | LABELED. | | | | | | -VERIFY PIPE MATERIAL TYPE OF THE 4INCH WATER MAIN. | | | | | | -LABEL 4INCH G.V. NUMBER 3 ? FIRELINE POINT OF SERVICE. | | | | | | -LABEL THE FIRE SERVICE PIPE WITH SIZE AND MATERIAL | | | TYPE. | | | | | | -WILL ANOTHER METERED IRRIGATION WATER SERVICE BE | | | NEEDED? | | | | | | -TENNIS FACILITY BUILDING APPEARS TO BE LOCATED ON TOP | | | OF AND CLOSE TO THE 20 INCH WATER MAIN WHICH IS A | | | MAINTENANCE AND UTILITY EASEMENT CONFLICT. PLEASE | | | RESOLVE CONFLICT. | | | | | | -THERE APPEARS TO BE SOME WATER MAIN PIPING THAT IS | | | ENTERING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE 454 FLAMINGO | | | PROPERTY. PLEASE SHOW CLEARLY ON WATER PLAN WHERE IT | | | TERMINATES AND GRANT UTILITY EASEMENT IF INSIDE | | | PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | -SHOW AND LABEL ALL EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENTS ON WATER | | | PLAN. FOR EXAMPLE, SITE PLAN SHOWS A 2FOOT UTILITY | | | EASEMENT RUNNING THROUGH THE SCHOOL WHICH IS NOT | | | DEPICTED ON THE WATER PLAN. | | | | | | -SHOW AND LABEL THE EXISTING METERED WATER SERVICES FOR | | | 453 CLAREMORE AND 454 FLAMINGO AND DETAIL WHAT IS | | | HAPPENING TO THE THEM. | | | | | | -COULD NOT FIND DEMOLITION PLAN. PLEASE SUBMIT DEMO | | | PLAN IF THERE WILL BE DEMOLITION. | | | | | | -WATER PLAN SHOWS A WATER MAIN RUNNING NORTH-SOUTH | | | THROUGH THE SCHOOL BUILDING AND PROPERTY. PLEASE VERIFY | | | AND UPDATE PLAN AS NEEDED. | | | | | | -WATER SERVICE STANDARD DETAILS ARE OLD REVISION. | | | PLEASE UPDATE TO NEWEST REVISION. | | | | | | -PROPOSED ROLLING GATE ON BISCAYNE WOULD CREATE ACCESS | | | PROBLEM FOR UTILITY PERSONNEL DOING EMERGENCY | | | MAINTENANCE OR WATER METER READING. PLEASE ELIMINATE | | | ROLLING GATE. | | | | | | -PROPOSED MONUMENT NEAR DIXIE IS IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO | | | EXISTING WATER MAIN WHICH COULD CREATE MAINTENANCE | | | CONFLICT. PLEASE INFORM HOW HEAVY MONUMENT WOULD BE. | | | ALSO LABEL DISTANCE BETWEEN WATER MAIN AND PROPOSED | | | MONUMENT AND SEE IF DISTANCE CAN BE INCREASED. | | | | | | -WHAT IS HAPPENING TO EXISTING DRIVEWAY APPROACH ON | | | CLAREMORE ADJACENT TO TENNIS FACILITY? | | | | | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | CONCERNS, THANKS. | | | RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES | | | DEPARTMENT | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 [email protected] | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-05-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
02-05-2021 |
Time |
12:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
02-05-2021 |
Time |
12:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-02-05 12:19:10 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE INTENDED | | | TO PROVIDE GUIDANCE FOR BUILDING PLAN SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE | | | OCCUPANCY TYPE, PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | AND WHETHER IT IS MIXED OR SEPARATED OCCUPANCY. | | | | | | 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE | | | LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER | | | SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED | | | ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | THE PROPOSED LOCATIONS OF THE FIRE HYDRANT AND FDC ARE | | | ACCEPTABLE WITH ANY CHANGES CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH | | | THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | 9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER | | | THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY | | | ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM, | | | ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FS 61G AND | | | SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PERMIT. | | | | | | 9A) THE LOCATION OF ANY APPLICABLE DDCV AND FIRE LINE | | | LOCATIONS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND | | | SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, | | | THE CITY'S ENGINEERS OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND | | | THE CITY'S PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE. | | | | | | 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE | | | SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY | | | DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS. | | | | | | 12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-03-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
08-03-2021 |
Time |
15:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
08-03-2021 |
Time |
15:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-08-03 15:40:33 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 2001 S DIXIE Z21010029 | | | AUGUST 3, 2021 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. ONGOING. PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE INSTALLATION AND | | | COMPLETION OF THE APPROVED AND PERMITTED LANDSCAPING | | | FOR THE CO OF THE EXISTING BUILDING EXPANSION. THE | | | CURRENT BUILDING IS OPERATING UNDER A TCO. IF THE | | | LANDSCAPING IS COMPLETED TO PERMIT PLAN, AND | | | CERTIFICATION FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CAN BE | | | ISSUED, A FINAL INSPECTION SHOULD BE SCHEDULED, AND THE | | | LANDSCAPE PERMIT 17071095 CLOSED. | | | CONTRACTOR,LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND AGENT WERE NOTIFIED | | | THAT THE AS BUILT LANDSCAPE PLANS MUST BE SUBMITTED AS | | | A REVISION TO THE LANDSCAPE PERMIT AD A FINAL LANDSCAPE | | | INSPECTION SHEDULED. ONCE THE LANDSCAPE FINAL IS | | | PASSED, THE PERMIT CAN BE CLOSED. | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO TREE | | | DISPOSITION CHART SHEET TD-1: | | | ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT ON | | | THE CONDITION OF THE LIVE OAK TREES PROPOSED TO BE | | | REMOVED. | | | THE REPORT MUST BE PROVIDED TO VERIFY CONDITION OF | | | TREES IF THEY CANNOT BE RELOCATED. | | | SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) NATIVE TREES IN GOOD CONDITION | | | MUST BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. | | | THE REPORT SUBMITTED DOES NOT PROVIDE THE CONDITION OF | | | EACH TREE AND THE REASON IT CANNOT BE RELOCATED PER THE | | | ANSI A 300 PART 6 PLANTING AND TRANSPLANTING ANNEX A | | | AND ANNEX B PROVIDE THE ASSESSMENT STANDARDS TO BE | | | USED. | | | | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENT 8/3/21: | | | .2. SHEET SP-2 SHOWS TENNIS FACILITY PHASE 1 WITHOUT | | | THE BUILDING. IF JUST SURFACE COURTS ARE TO BE BUILT, | | | THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS REQUIRED ALONG THE RAILROAD | | | TRACK PROPERTY LINE. THE FENCING WOULD ALSO BE SUBJECT | | | TO SETBACKS. PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR PHASE 1. | | | | | | | | | | | | ? OTHER COMMENTS PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-17-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aburnett |
Date |
06-17-2021 |
Time |
13:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aburnett |
Date |
06-17-2021 |
Time |
13:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-06-17 13:41:15 | | | | LANDSCAPING: ANDREW BURNETT [email protected] | | | | | | 1. ONGOING. PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE INSTALLATION AND | | | COMPLETION OF THE APPROVED AND PERMITTED LANDSCAPING | | | FOR THE CO OF THE EXISTING BUILDING EXPANSION. THE | | | CURRENT BUILDING IS OPERATING UNDER A TCO. IF THE | | | LANDSCAPING IS COMPLETED TO PERMIT PLAN, AND | | | CERTIFICATION FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CAN BE | | | ISSUED, A FINAL INSPECTION SHOULD BE SCHEDULED, AND THE | | | LANDSCAPE PERMIT 17071095 CLOSED. | | | | | | RESPONSE: PARTIALLY SATISFIED FINAL INSPECTION NEEDED, | | | CERTIFICATION LETTER RECEIVED. | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO TREE | | | DISPOSITION CHART SHEET TD-1: | | | A. SATISFIED | | | B. SATISFIED | | | C. SATISFIED | | | D. SATISFIED | | | | | | | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. | | | | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION | | | | | | RESPONSE: COMMENT ACKNOWLEDGED. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-31-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-31-2021 |
Time |
17:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-31-2021 |
Time |
17:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-31 17:23:12 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 2001 S DIXIE Z21010029 | | | MARCH 31, 2021 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. ONGOING. PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE INSTALLATION AND | | | COMPLETION OF THE APPROVED AND PERMITTED LANDSCAPING | | | FOR THE CO OF THE EXISTING BUILDING EXPANSION. THE | | | CURRENT BUILDING IS OPERATING UNDER A TCO. IF THE | | | LANDSCAPING IS COMPLETED TO PERMIT PLAN, AND | | | CERTIFICATION FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CAN BE | | | ISSUED, A FINAL INSPECTION SHOULD BE SCHEDULED, AND THE | | | LANDSCAPE PERMIT 17071095 CLOSED. | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO TREE | | | DISPOSITION CHART SHEET TD-1: | | | ? NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT ON THE | | | CONDITION OF THE LIVE OAK TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED. | | | THE REPORT MUST BE PROVIDED TO VERIFY CONDITION OF | | | TREES IF THEY CANNOT BE RELOCATED. | | | ? SATISFIED. IF CANOPY DIAMETER IS UNDER 20 FEET, THE | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE IS BASED ON THE CATEGORY FOR THE TREE. | | | TREES #34, 35, 36, AND 38 ARE 300 SQ FT MITIGATION DUE | | | EACH. CORRECT IN THE TREE INVENTORY LIST. | | | ? SATISFIED. UMBRELLA TREE #44 IS REQUIRED TO BE | | | REMOVED PRIOR TO THE FINAL LANDSCAPE INSPECTION. | | | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF | | | MITIGATION DUE AND SHOW MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE | | | PROVIDED FROM THE PROPOSED TREE LIST AFTER ALL | | | CORRECTIONS. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFER PLANTINGS ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT | | | TO THE OUTDOOR COURTS SHOWING THE REQUIRED TREES OR | | | NUMBER OF SUBSTITUTE PALMS PER CURRENT CODE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(B). THE EXCEPTION IN | | | SECTION 94-305 (B)(11) IS RELATED TO BUILDING SETBACKS | | | OF ZERO FEET. IF BUILDING IS AT ZERO, THE REQUIRED | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS NOT POSSIBLE, BUT IF THERE IS NOT A | | | BUILDING THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE FOUNDATION PLANTING | | | CALCULATIONS TO REFLECT THE PERCENTAGE OF EACH BUILDING | | | FOR 30% REQUIRED AND PROVIDED LINEAR FOOTAGE TO MEET | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(E)(1). | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TREE AND TERMINAL | | | LANDSCAPE ISLAND AT THE WEST END OF THE ROW OF PARKING | | | SOUTH SIDE OF THE OFFICE BUILDING IN ADDITION TO THE | | | BUFFER TREE REQUIREMENT. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A | | | MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO | | | BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING | | | AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE | | | PERCENTAGE OF CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR THE | | | REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS. REMOVE REFERENCE 1 PER 100 SQ | | | FT FOR CANOPY TREES IN THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS | | | CHART, AS THIS IS NO LONGER IN THE CODE. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. INDICATE WHERE THE FPL TRANSFORMER WILL | | | BE LOCATED FOR THE EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. SHOW THE WATER AND SEWER CONNECTIONS FOR | | | THE EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING TO SHOW THERE ARE NO | | | CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 9. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE PLACEMENT OF THE FIRE | | | HYDRANT IN THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND ON THE NORTH SIDE OF | | | THE EXISTING BISCAYNE DRIVE DISPLACES THE REQUIRED | | | TREE. RELOCATE THE HYDRANT TO A LOCATION THAT IS NOT IN | | | CONFLICT. | | | | | | HYDRANT MUST BE LOCATED TO ALLOW FOR THE FULL LANDSCAPE | | | ISLAND AREA AT 8FEET WIDTH AND FULL LENGTH OF THE | | | ADJACENT PARKING SPACE, WITHOUT LIMITATION BY ROOT | | | BARRIER. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-09-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
02-09-2021 |
Time |
17:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
02-09-2021 |
Time |
17:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-02-09 17:37:04 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 2001 S DIXIE Z21010029 | | | FEBRUARY 9, 2021 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE INSTALLATION AND | | | COMPLETION OF THE APPROVED AND PERMITTED LANDSCAPING | | | FOR THE CO OF THE EXISTING BUILDING EXPANSION. THE | | | CURRENT BUILDING IS OPERATING UNDER A TCO. IF THE | | | LANDSCAPING IS COMPLETED TO PERMIT PLAN, AND | | | CERTIFICATION FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CAN BE | | | ISSUED, A FINAL INSPECTION SHOULD BE SCHEDULED, AND THE | | | LANDSCAPE PERMIT 17071095 CLOSED. | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO TREE | | | DISPOSITION CHART SHEET TD-1: | | | ? PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT ON THE CONDITION OF THE | | | LIVE OAK TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED. | | | ? IF CANOPY DIAMETER IS UNDER 20 FEET, THE SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE IS BASED ON THE CATEGORY FOR THE TREE. TREES | | | #34, 35, 36, AND 38 ARE 300 SQ FT MITIGATION DUE EACH. | | | CORRECT IN THE TREE INVENTORY LIST. | | | ? UMBRELLA TREE #44 IS REQUIRED TO BE REMOVED PRIOR TO | | | THE FINAL LANDSCAPE INSPECTION. | | | ? PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF MITIGATION DUE | | | AND SHOW MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED FROM THE | | | PROPOSED TREE LIST AFTER ALL CORRECTIONS. | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER | | | PLANTINGS ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO THE | | | OUTDOOR COURTS SHOWING THE REQUIRED TREES OR NUMBER OF | | | SUBSTITUTE PALMS PER CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | SECTION 94-443(B). THE EXCEPTION IN SECTION 94-305 | | | (B)(11) IS RELATED TO BUILDING SETBACKS OF ZERO FEET. | | | IF BUILDING IS AT ZERO, THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER | | | IS NOT POSSIBLE, BUT IF THERE IS NOT A BUILDING THE | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE THE FOUNDATION PLANTING CALCULATIONS TO | | | REFLECT THE PERCENTAGE OF EACH BUILDING FOR 30% | | | REQUIRED AND PROVIDED LINEAR FOOTAGE TO MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(E)(1). | | | | | | 4. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN | | | TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | | | | | | | 5. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TREE AND TERMINAL LANDSCAPE | | | ISLAND AT THE WEST END OF THE ROW OF PARKING SOUTH SIDE | | | OF THE OFFICE BUILDING IN ADDITION TO THE BUFFER TREE | | | REQUIREMENT. | | | | | | 6. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A MINIMUM OF 75 | | | PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED | | | WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING AREA SHALL | | | BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE OF | | | CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE | | | AREAS. REMOVE REFERENCE 1 PER 100 SQ FT FOR CANOPY | | | TREES IN THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CHART, AS THIS IS | | | NO LONGER IN THE CODE. | | | | | | 7. INDICATE WHERE THE FPL TRANSFORMER WILL BE LOCATED | | | FOR THE EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING. | | | | | | 8. SHOW THE WATER AND SEWER CONNECTIONS FOR THE | | | EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING TO SHOW THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS | | | WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 9. THE PLACEMENT OF THE FIRE HYDRANT IN THE LANDSCAPE | | | ISLAND ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE EXISTING BISCAYNE DRIVE | | | DISPLACES THE REQUIRED TREE. RELOCATE THE HYDRANT TO A | | | LOCATION THAT IS NOT IN CONFLICT. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-09-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
02-09-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
02-09-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-02-09 10:20:43 | CONDITION OF APPROVAL: | | | - THE CONTAINER(S) SHALL BE ON WHEELS AND ROLLED OUT TO | | | THE MAIN ROAD, BISCAYNE DR, ON THE SERVICE DAYS. | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DPET. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-31-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
08-31-2021 |
Time |
14:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
08-31-2021 |
Time |
14:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-08-31 14:52:37 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | ENGINEERING PLANS SUBMITTED 8/31/2021. | | | | | | 1. [SARTISFIED] PROVIDE SPOT GRADES OR FLOW ARROWS FOR | | | THE PARKING AREAS NORTH OF BISCAYNE DR. | | | | | | 2. [SATISFIED] - PREVIOUS COMMENT: INDICATE IF THE | | | SIDEWALK ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE PARKING LOT NORTH | | | OF BISCAYNE DR WILL BE FLUSH OR ELEVATED WITH THE | | | PARKING SPACES.] RESPONSE TO COMMENT WAS THAT THE | | | SIDEWALK WOULD BE FLUSH WITH THE PARKING AREA. THESE | | | PARKING SPACES ARE 16 FEET DEEP WITH TWO FEET OF | | | OVERHANG ON THE SIDEWALK. WHEEL STOPS OR RAISED | | | SIDEWALK WILL BE NEEDED TO PREVENT VEHICLES FROM | | | PARKING FURTHER OVER THE SIDEWALK. | | | | | | 3. [SATISFIED] THE EXISTING CATCH BASINS THAT WILL BE | | | CONNECTED TO EXFILTRATION TRENCHES SHOULD INCLUDE PRBS. | | | PREVIOUS COMMENT: EXISTING CATCH BASINS IN THE PARKING | | | LOT NORTH OF BISCAYNE DR SHOULD HAVE BAFFLES INSTALLED | | | TO PROTECT THE EXFILTRATION TRENCHES. | | | | | | 4. [SATISFIED] CONSIDER USING THE EXISTING CATCH BASIN | | | SOUTH OF S-102 INSTEAD OF STRUCTURE S-102 TO CONNECT | | | THE NEW EXFILTRATION TRENCHES WITH THE EXISTING | | | DRAINAGE SYSTEM. THIS WILL MOVE THE EAST-WEST DRAINAGE | | | PIPE OUT OF THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND. | | | | | | 5. [SATISFIED] CONFIRM THE EXISTING DRAINAGE AND | | | SANITARY SEWER MAINS ARE CORRECTLY SHOWN AT THE EAST | | | END OF BISCAYNE DR (EAST OF THE ALLEY). | | | | | | 6. [SATISFIED] THE CITY MAY HAVE TO OBTAIN AN EASEMENT | | | OVER THE EASTERN TWO CATCH BASINS AND DOWNSTREAM STORM | | | PIPES AND STRUCTURES IN BISCAYNE DR. RIGHT OF WAY. | | | | | | 7. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE CROSS SECTION FOR DRIVEWAY ONTO | | | FLAMINGO DR. | | | | | | 8. [SATISFIED] CURB INLET DRAINAGE STRUCTURE AT | | | FLAMINGO DRIVE DRIVEWAY WILL NEED TO BE MODIFIED. SHOW | | | PIPE CONNECTION(S) TO THE STRUCTURE. | | | | | | 9. [SATISFIED] THIS WILL BE CONFIRMED DURING | | | ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. PREVIOUS COMMENT: THE | | | DRAINAGE SYSTEM IS TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP | | | CRITERIA. | | | | | | 10. [SATISFIED] RAISED CURB OR WHEEL STOPS WILL BE | | | NEEDED AT THE END OF THE PARALLEL PARKING SPACES ON THE | | | NORTH SIDE OF BISCAYNE DRIVE. | | | | | | 11. [SATISFIED] PARKING ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF | | | BISCAYNE DRIVE SHOULD BE PROHIBITED OPPOSITE THE | | | PARALLEL PARKING SPACES TO ALLOW SUFFICIENT BACKUP AREA | | | BEHIND THE PARALLEL PARKING SPACES. | | | | | | 12. [SATISFIED] STRUCTURE S-102: SHOULD WEIR BE PLACED | | | OVER THE EAST PIPE OPENING? SHOULD SOUTH INVERT BE | | | INDICATED AS EAST INVERT? | | | | | | 13. [SATISFIED] THE WEST PIPE FOR THE STORM MANHOLE | | | EAST OF THE ALLEY IS CALLED OUT AS 18-INCH CLAY PIPE | | | BUT THE PIPELINE IS LABELED AS EXIST. 18-INCH RCP. | | | | | | 14. [SATISFIED] REMOVE THE PRIOR EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS | | | SHOWN WHERE THE EXISTING SCHOOL BUILDING IS SHOWN. | | | | | | 15. [NOT SATISFIED] THE PARKING SPACES IN QUESTION ARE | | | DIRECTLY SOUTH OF THE EXISTING SCHOOL BUILDING. | | | PREVIOUS COMMENT: SHOW ON THE DEMOLITION PLAN THE | | | REMOVAL OF THE SIDEWALK ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF | | | BISCAYNE DRIVE WHERE THE NEW PARALLEL PARKING SPACES | | | ARE PROPOSED. | | | | | | 16. [SATISFIED] SUGGEST ADDING CROSSWALK STRIPING AND | | | SIGNAGE ON BISCAYNE DRIVE AT THE CURB RAMPS EST OF THE | | | ALLEY. | | | | | | 17. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE CONVERSION FACTOR BETWEEN NAVD | | | 1988 AND NGVD 1929 ON ALL SHEETS WITH ELEVATION | | | INFORMATIKON. | | | | | | 18. [NOT SATISFIED] LABEL THE EASEMENT(S) ON SHEET | | | C2.1. PREVIOUS COMMENT: SHOW AND LABEL THE UTILITY | | | EASEMENT(S) ON BISCAYNE DRIVE. | | | | | | 19. [SATISFIED] THE EXISTING 12" STORM TO BE CONNECTED | | | TO THE NEW DRAINAGE SYSTEM WITH 18" X 12" TEE AT THE | | | WEST END OF BISCAYNE DRIVE MAY REQUIRE THE TEE BE | | | ROTATED UP OR DOWN. A STRUCTURE MAY BE NEEDED INSTEAD | | | OF THE TEE TO MAKE THE CONNECTION. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 (O) | | | 561-351-0510 (M) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-04-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
08-04-2021 |
Time |
08:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-08-03 16:32:15 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | ENGINEERING PLANS SUBMITTED 7/28/2021. | | | | | | 1. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE SPOT GRADES OR FLOW ARROWS | | | FOR THE PARKING AREAS NORTH OF BISCAYNE DR. | | | | | | 2. [NOT SATISFIED - PREVIOUS COMMENT: INDICATE IF THE | | | SIDEWALK ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE PARKING LOT NORTH | | | OF BISCAYNE DR WILL BE FLUSH OR ELEVATED WITH THE | | | PARKING SPACES.] RESPONSE TO COMMENT WAS THAT THE | | | SIDEWALK WOULD BE FLUSH WITH THE PARKING AREA. THESE | | | PARKING SPACES ARE 16 FEET DEEP WITH TWO FEET OF | | | OVERHANG ON THE SIDEWALK. WHEEL STOPS OR RAISED | | | SIDEWALK WILL BE NEEDED TO PREVENT VEHICLES FROM | | | PARKING FURTHER OVER THE SIDEWALK. | | | | | | 3. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] THE EXISTING CATCH BASINS THAT | | | WILL BE CONNECTED TO EXFILTRATION TRENCHES SHOULD | | | INCLUDE PRBS. PREVIOUS COMMENT: EXISTING CATCH BASINS | | | IN THE PARKING LOT NORTH OF BISCAYNE DR SHOULD HAVE | | | BAFFLES INSTALLED TO PROTECT THE EXFILTRATION TRENCHES. | | | | | | 4. [SATISFIED] CONSIDER USING THE EXISTING CATCH BASIN | | | SOUTH OF S-102 INSTEAD OF STRUCTURE S-102 TO CONNECT | | | THE NEW EXFILTRATION TRENCHES WITH THE EXISTING | | | DRAINAGE SYSTEM. THIS WILL MOVE THE EAST-WEST DRAINAGE | | | PIPE OUT OF THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND. | | | | | | 5. [SATISFIED] CONFIRM THE EXISTING DRAINAGE AND | | | SANITARY SEWER MAINS ARE CORRECTLY SHOWN AT THE EAST | | | END OF BISCAYNE DR (EAST OF THE ALLEY). | | | | | | 6. [SATISFIED] THE CITY MAY HAVE TO OBTAIN AN EASEMENT | | | OVER THE EASTERN TWO CATCH BASINS AND DOWNSTREAM STORM | | | PIPES AND STRUCTURES IN BISCAYNE DR. RIGHT OF WAY. | | | | | | 7. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE CROSS SECTION FOR DRIVEWAY | | | ONTO FLAMINGO DR. | | | | | | 8. [NOT SATISFIED] CURB INLET DRAINAGE STRUCTURE AT | | | FLAMINGO DRIVE DRIVEWAY WILL NEED TO BE MODIFIED. SHOW | | | PIPE CONNECTION(S) TO THE STRUCTURE. | | | | | | 9. [SATISFIED] THIS WILL BE CONFIRMED DURING | | | ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. PREVIOUS COMMENT: THE | | | DRAINAGE SYSTEM IS TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP | | | CRITERIA. | | | | | | NEW COMMENTS: | | | 10. RAISED CURB OR WHEEL STOPS WILL BE NEEDED AT THE | | | END OF THE PARALLEL PARKING SPACES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF | | | BISCAYNE DRIVE. | | | | | | 11. PARKING ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF BISCAYNE DRIVE | | | SHOULD BE PROHIBITED OPPOSITE THE PARALLEL PARKING | | | SPACES TO ALLOW SUFFICIENT BACKUP AREA BEHIND THE | | | PARALLEL PARKING SPACES. | | | | | | 12. STRUCTURE S-102: SHOULD WEIR BE PLACED OVER THE | | | EAST PIPE OPENING? SHOULD SOUTH INVERT BE INDICATED AS | | | EAST INVERT? | | | | | | 13. THE WEST PIPE FOR THE STORM MANHOLE EAST OF THE | | | ALLEY IS CALLED OUT AS 18-INCH CLAY PIPE BUT THE | | | PIPELINE IS LABELED AS EXIST. 18-INCH RCP. | | | | | | 14. REMOVE THE PRIOR EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN WHERE | | | THE EXISTING SCHOOL BUILDING IS SHOWN. | | | | | | 15. SHOW ON THE DEMOLITION PLAN THE REMOVAL OF THE | | | SIDEWALK ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF BISCAYNE DRIVE WHERE | | | THE NEW PARALLEL PARKING SPACES ARE PROPOSED. | | | | | | 16. SUGGEST ADDING CROSSWALK STRIPING AND SIGNAGE ON | | | BISCAYNE DRIVE AT THE CURB RAMPS EST OF THE ALLEY. | | | | | | 17. PROVIDE CONVERSION FACTOR BETWEEN NAVD 1988 AND | | | NGVD 1929 ON ALL SHEETS WITH ELEVATION INFORMATIKON. | | | | | | 18. SHOW AND LABEL THE UTILITY EASEMENT(S) ON BISCAYNE | | | DRIVE. | | | | | | 19. THE EXISTING 12" STORM TO BE CONNECTED TO THE NEW | | | DRAINAGE SYSTEM WITH 18" X 12" TEE AT THE WEST END OF | | | BISCAYNE DRIVE MAY REQUIRE THE TEE BE ROTATED UP OR | | | DOWN. A STRUCTURE MAY BE NEEDED INSTEAD OF THE TEE TO | | | MAKE THE CONNECTION. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 (O) | | | 561-351-0510 (M) | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
|
Date |
04-06-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
04-06-2021 |
Time |
21:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
04-06-2021 |
Time |
21:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-04-06 21:40:24 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | ENGINEERING PLANS SUBMITTED 3/25/2021: | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES OR FLOW ARROWS FOR THE PARKING | | | AREAS NORTH OF BISCAYNE DR. | | | | | | 2. INDICATE IF THE SIDEWALK ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE | | | PARKING LOT NORTH OF BISCAYNE DR WILL BE FLUSH OR | | | ELEVATED WITH THE PARKING SPACES. | | | | | | 3. EXISTING CATCH BASINS IN THE PARKING LOT NORTH OF | | | BISCAYNE DR SHOULD HAVE BAFFLES INSTALLED TO PROTECT | | | THE EXFILTRATION TRENCHES. | | | | | | 4. CONSIDER USING THE EXISTING CATCH BASIN SOUTH OF | | | S-102 INSTEAD OF STRUCTURE S-102 TO CONNECT THE NEW | | | EXFILTRATION TRENCHES WITH THE EXISTING DRAINAGE | | | SYSTEM. THIS WILL MOVE THE EAST-WEST DRAINAGE PIPE OUT | | | OF THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND. | | | | | | 5. CONFIRM THE EXISTING DRAINAGE AND SANITARY SEWER | | | MAINS ARE CORRECLTY SHOWN AT THE EAST END OF BISCAYNE | | | DR (EAST OF THE ALLEY). | | | | | | 6. THE CITY MAY HAVE TO OBTAIN AN EASEMENT OVER THE | | | EASTERN TWO CATCH BASINS AND DOWNSTREAM STORM PIPES AND | | | STRUCTURES IN BISCAYNE DR. RIGHT OF WAY. | | | | | | 7. PROVIDE CROSS SECTION FOR DRIVEWAY ONTO FLAMINGO DR. | | | | | | 8. CURB INLET DRAINAGE STRUCTURE AT FLAMINGO DRIVE | | | DRIVEWAY WILL NEED TO BE MODIFIED. SHOW PIPE | | | CONNECTION(S) TO THE STRUCTURE. | | | | | | 9. THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM IS TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD | | | ERP CRITERIA. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 (O) | | | 561-351-0510 (M) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-11-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
02-11-2021 |
Time |
11:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
02-11-2021 |
Time |
11:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-02-11 11:32:55 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE AS-BUILT DRAWING FOR THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM | | | SERVING THE PARKING LOT ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BISCAYNE | | | DRIVE. CONFIRM THAT IT CONNECTS TO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM | | | IN S. DIXIE. | | | | | | 2. DRAINAGE PATTERNS TO BE MAINTAINED ON BISCAYNE DRIVE | | | AT THE CONNECTION WITH S. DIXIE HWY. I.E. RUNOFF FROM | | | S. DIXIE TO CONTINUE TO FLOW ON TO BISCAYNE DRIVE UNTIL | | | OTHER ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE STORMWATER RUNOFF IS MADE. | | | | | | 3. THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM IN BISCAYNE DRIVE MAY BE ABLE TO | | | BE TURNED OVER TO THE DEVELOPER WHEN THE BISCAYNE R/W | | | IS ABANDONED. PLEASE ADVISE WHICH ENTITIES WILL HAVE | | | LAND OWNERSHIP OF THE ABANDONED BSICAYNE DRIVE R/W AND | | | THE PARCELS ADJACENT TO BISCAYNE DRIVE. STAFF WILL | | | CHECK WITH PUBLIC UTILITIES REGARDING PROCESS FOR | | | TURNING IT OVER. EASEMENT MAY BE NEEDED OVER THE | | | EASTERN MOST CATCH BASINS AND PIPES OUT TO S. DIXIE | | | HWY. | | | | | | 4. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP | | | CRITERIA FOR WATER QUALITY AND PEAK FLOW LIMITATIONS. | | | CONSIDER INCLUDING LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT IN THE | | | DESIGN. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | | | | 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED | | | WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 4. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED WITH THE | | | ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 (O) | | | 561-351-0510 (M) | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-16-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
06-16-2021 |
Time |
09:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-06-16 10:45:07 | 1. BISCAYNE SURVEY13-1383-15 05 26 21 IS STILL NOT | | | SIGNED. | | | 2. NEED TO KNOW HOW FDOT WANTS TO HANDLE THE DRAINAGE | | | AT DIXIE. THIS IS HOLDING UP THE APPRAISALS. | | | 3. WHEN ABANDONED, BISCAYNE AND THE ALLEY WILL BE | | | DIVIDED UP BETWEEN MULTIPLE OWNERS. THIS IS GOING TO | | | CREATE PARCELS WITH NO FRONTAGE SO THERE MAY HAVE TO BE | | | EITHER ADDITIONAL PLATTING OR UNITY OF TITLES TO CLEAN | | | UP. MAY NEED TO BE HELD IN ESCROW. WILL NEED APPROVAL | | | FROM ADJACENT OWNER(S)IF THEY ARE WILLING OR ABLE. | | | 4. RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS COMMENT #4 SAYS FPL WAS | | | ABANDONED BUT WHAT I NEED ARE COPIES OF DEED BOOK UE'S | | | SHOWN ON SURVEY. | | | 5. A SEPARATE PLAT COMMENTS LETTER WILL BE ISSUED. PLAT | | | REVIEW FEE OF $1501 IS REQUIRED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-29-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
03-29-2021 |
Time |
10:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-29 10:25:30 | 1. SURVEY STILL NOT SIGNED. | | | 2. NEED SURVEY OF ALLEY. | | | 3. SHOW EXISTING SANITARY ON SP-1. | | | 4. OLD UE'S WILL NEED TO BE ABANDONED. PROVIDE COPIES | | | FOR OWNERSHIP. | | | 5. ENG. PLANS SHOW EXISTING STORM MANHOLE ON TOP OF | | | EXISTING WATER MAIN AT WEST END OF BISCAYNE? | | | 6. EXISTING DRAINAGE FROM DIXIE (FDOT) DRAINS INTO THE | | | EASTERN 2 CATCH BASINS THEN OUT INTO THE DIXIE DRAINAGE | | | SYSTEM. PRIOR TO APPROVAL WE WILL NEED TO KNOW FROM | | | FDOT HOW TO HANDLE. CONSULTANT TO CONTACT FDOT TO | | | RESOLVE. | | | | | | PREVIOUS COMMENTS FOR REPLAT AND EASEMENT RESERVATION | | | STILL PERTAIN. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-05-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
02-05-2021 |
Time |
14:20 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-02-05 14:52:06 | INCLUDES PB CASE NO.'S 1876 AND 1877. | | | | | | 1. SURVEY NEEDS TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED. | | | 2. NEED SEPARATE S & S COPIES OF SKETCH AND LEGALS FOR | | | ABANDONMENTS. NEED SIGN-OFFS FROM ALL UTILITIES. | | | 3. APPRAISALS WILL BE REQUIRED AND WILL BE ORDERED | | | AFTER RECEIPT OF PAYMENT. QUOTE WILL BE REQUESTED AFTER | | | FURTHER REVIEW. | | | 4. REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED. LIMITS TO BE DETERMINED. | | | 5. REVIEW OF EXISTING DRAINAGE IS NEEDED. ENG. PLANS | | | SHOW DRAINAGE INTO FEC R/W WHICH DIFFERS FROM GIS. | | | 6. ADD CONVERSION TO NGVD TO SURVEY AND ENGINEERING | | | PLANS. | | | 7. UTILITY AND/OR DRAINAGE EASEMENTS WILL NEED TO BE | | | RESERVED. | | | 8. MAY NEED TO ADJUST BUILDING DUE TO PROXIMITY WITH | | | 20" WATER MAIN. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-22-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
06-22-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-06-22 18:20:55 | NO FURTHER COMMENTS. | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-29-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
03-29-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-29 16:41:27 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS | | | 1) NOT-SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER ONCE | | | AVAILABLE | | | 2) SATISFIED. SHOWCASE TURNING VOLUMES AT THE FLAMINGO | | | AND DIXIE INTERSECTION IN FIGURE 2 | | | 3) SATISFIED. ONLY ONE SCHOOL AND THE TENNIS COURT HAVE | | | BEEN ACCOUNTED FOR TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS. PLEASE | | | INCLUDE THE OTHER FACILITIES WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT | | | (I.E. OFFICE BUILDING AND SECOND SCHOOL) | | | 4) SATISFIED. PROVIDE INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR: | | | O DIXIE AND BELVEDERE | | | O DIXIE AND FLAMINGO DR | | | O DIXIE AND BISCAYNE BLVD | | | 5) NOT-SATISFIED. PLEASE SUMMARIZE AND TABULARIZE THE | | | RESULTS OF THE INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSES FOR | | | FLAMINGO AND BISCAYNE, SPECIFICALLY LOS FOR EACH | | | SCENARIO. PLEASE INCLUDE PROPER NARRATIVE EXPLAINING | | | THE RESULTS, HIGHLIGHTING FAILING MOVEMENTS, AND | | | PROPOSING MITIGATION OR ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS, IF ANY. | | | 6) NOT-SATISFIED. CONDUCT A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT | | | ANALYSIS FOR THE DIXIE AND BISCAYNE BLVD INTERSECTION | | | | | | SITE COMMENTS | | | 7) PARTIALLY-SATISFIED. PROVIDE DETAILS OF STREETS AND | | | PARCELS ON THE OPPOSITE OF THE ROAD(S) SURROUNDING THE | | | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT (E.G. DRIVEWAYS, CURB CUTS, | | | PARKING STALLS, ETC.). PLEASE PROVIDE MISSING DETAILS | | | ALONG CLAREMORE DR. | | | 8) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CROSSWALK ACROSS THE BISCAYNE | | | BLVD DRIVEWAY | | | 9) SATISFIED. MILL AND REPAVE BISCAYNE BLVD | | | 10) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN FOR THE LOADING ZONE | | | 11) SATISFIED. IF NOT PRESENT, PROVIDE BICYCLE RACKS | | | NEARBY EACH BUILDING OR FACILITY ENTRANCES, AND | | | IDENTIFY THEM ON THE SITE PLAN. RECORD THE NUMBER OF | | | BICYCLE PARKING IN THE SITE TABULAR DATA | | | 12) SATISFIED. ONLY ONE SCHOOL AND THE TENNIS COURTS | | | WERE INCLUDED IN PARKING CALCULATIONS. PLEASE INCLUDE | | | THE OTHER FACILITIES WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT (I.E. | | | OFFICE BUILDING AND SECOND SCHOOL) | | | 13) PARTIALLY-SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE A | | | MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 FEET) AND | | | PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS (CIRCUIT BOX | | | AND ELECTRIC CONDUIT). PLEASE LOCATE THE MICROMOBILITY | | | STATION NEARBY A BUILDING ENTRANCE. | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-11-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
02-11-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-02-11 12:28:46 | TRAFFIC STATEMENT COMMENTS | | | 1) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | 2) SHOWCASE TURNING VOLUMES AT THE FLAMINGO AND DIXIE | | | INTERSECTION IN FIGURE 2 | | | 3) ONLY ONE SCHOOL AND THE TENNIS COURT HAVE BEEN | | | ACCOUNTED FOR TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS. PLEASE | | | INCLUDE THE OTHER FACILITIES WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT | | | (I.E. OFFICE BUILDING AND SECOND SCHOOL) | | | 4) PROVIDE INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR: | | | O DIXIE AND BELVEDERE | | | O DIXIE AND FLAMINGO DR | | | O DIXIE AND BISCAYNE BLVD | | | | | | SITE COMMENTS | | | 5) PROVIDE DETAILS OF STREETS AND PARCELS ON THE | | | OPPOSITE OF THE ROAD(S) SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT (E.G. DRIVEWAYS, CURB CUTS, PARKING STALLS, | | | ETC.) | | | 6) PROVIDE A CROSSWALK ACROSS THE BISCAYNE BLVD | | | DRIVEWAY | | | 7) MILL AND REPAVE BISCAYNE BLVD | | | 8) PROVIDE AUTOTURN FOR THE LOADING ZONE | | | 9) IF NOT PRESENT, PROVIDE BICYCLE RACKS NEARBY EACH | | | BUILDING OR FACILITY ENTRANCES, AND IDENTIFY THEM ON | | | THE SITE PLAN. RECORD THE NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING IN | | | THE SITE TABULAR DATA | | | 10) ONLY ONE SCHOOL AND THE TENNIS COURTS WERE INCLUDED | | | IN PARKING CALCULATIONS. PLEASE INCLUDE THE OTHER | | | FACILITIES WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT (I.E. OFFICE BUILDING | | | AND SECOND SCHOOL) | | | 11) IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE A MICRO-MOBILITY STATION | | | AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC | | | ELECTRIFICATION READINESS (CIRCUIT BOX AND ELECTRIC | | | CONDUIT) | | | | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-04-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
08-04-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
08-04-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-08-04 14:20:45 | ALL OUTSTANDING PPRC REVIEW COMMENTS SHALL BE ADDRESSED | | | PRIOR TO MOVING FORWARD TO A PUBLIC HEARING. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-21-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
06-21-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
06-21-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-06-21 15:05:30 | GENERAL COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE PUBLIC | | | UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR | | | WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE | | | COLLECTION SERVICES. PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY'S | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT (561) 494-1040 FOR | | | INFORMATION. [2/10/2021 AND 4/2/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: | | | CITY SERVICE LETTER NOT PROVIDED IN 3/9/2021 OR | | | 6/3/2021 RESUBMITTAL PACKAGE.] | | | | | | 2.) PROVIDE LETTERS FROM THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC UTILITY | | | COMPANIES CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT | | | ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE | | | WITH THE PROVISION OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, FLU, FPL | | | AND COMCAST. [2/10/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: REQUESTED | | | LETTERS FROM THE UTILITY COMPANIES NOT PROVIDED IN | | | 3/9/2021 RESUBMITTAL PACKAGE. SPOKE TO JSCHMIDT ON | | | 6/16/21 AND WAS INFORMED OF DIFFICULTIES OBTAINING | | | LETTERS; STAFF EMAILED RECENT CONTACTS FOR UTILITY | | | PROVIDERS TO JSCHMDIT ON 6/16.] | | | | | | 3.) THE RESUBMITTAL FOR THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP | | | AMENDMENT (REFERENCE: PB 1878A) WAS NOT PROVIDED IN THE | | | RESUBMITTAL PACKET FOR THE CPD. PLEASE PROVIDE A STATUS | | | UPDATE, AS ALL APPLICATIONS SHOULD MOVE FORWARD | | | CONCURRENTLY. [NOTE: RECEIVED UPDATE FROM JSCHMDIT ON | | | 6/18/2021. APPLICANT IS WORKING ON GETTING THE CRITICAL | | | COMPONENTS OF THE FLUMA APPLICATION.] | | | | | | | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) IN THE NOTES TABLE: A) PLEASE CONFIRM IF THE LATEST | | | SURVEY FOR THE PROJECT APPLICATION (DATED 1/23/2021) | | | WAS USED FOR THE BASE INFORMATION FOR THE PROPOSED | | | PROJECT. ACCORDING TO THE NOTES, THE SURVEY USED WAS | | | DATED 7/16/18. PLEASE CORRECT IF THIS WAS AN ERROR. | | | B) THE NOTE FOR OUTDOOR LIGHTING HAS BEEN DUPLICATED IN | | | THE TABLE. PLEASE ELIMINATE THE DUPLICATE. | | | | | | 2.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE SITE DATA | | | TABULAR FOR ACCURACY: A) STAFF HAS COUNTED THE BICYCLE | | | PARKING TO BE 8 (NOT 6). PLEASE ADDRESS FOR | | | CONSISTENCY. | | | | | | 3.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE PROPERTY | | | DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS: A) THE PROPOSED FAR IS 0.74 | | | (NOT 0.64 AS SPECIFIED IN THE TABLE). | | | | | | 4.) FOR TENNIS FACILITY PHASE I (SHEET SP-2): THE | | | PROPOSED 14 FT. HIGH FENCE SHALL MEET THE HEIGHT | | | REQUIREMENTS IN ZLDR S.94-302(C). IF THE FENCE HEIGHT | | | CANNOT BE MET, THEN A WAIVER SHALL BE REQUESTED AT THIS | | | TIME. [NOTE: IF THE FENCE IS LOCATED BEYOND THE | | | REQUIRED SETBACKS, THE HEIGHT MAY BE GREATER THAN THE | | | MAXIMUM HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS PROVIDED IN ZLDR | | | S.94-302(C)]. | | | | | | 5.) REPLACE EXISTING 5 FT. HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH | | | ALUMINUM PICKET PROPOSED ELSEWHERE IN THE PROJECT FOR | | | CONSISTENCY. CONSISTENCY WITH THE DECORATIVE ALUMINUM | | | FENCING WOULD ENHANCE THE VISUAL APPEAL AND PROVIDE A | | | GREATER SENSE OF COHESION WITH THE PROJECT. | | | | | | | | | LIGHTING/PHOTOMETRIC PLAN: | | | | | | 1.) THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHALL SHOW ILLUMINATION | | | SPILLOVER BEYOND THE PROPERTY LINES OF THE PROJECT. | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT PER ZLDR S.94-207(D)(8), ANY SOURCE OF | | | ILLUMINATION FOR A CPD SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE FOOTCANDLE | | | AT OR BEYOND THE BOUNDARIES OF THE DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE | | | DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. [4/2/21 REPEAT COMMENT: LIGHT | | | SPILLOVER MUST BE SHOWN PAST THE PROPERTY LINE(S) TO | | | DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH ZLDR S. 94-207(D)(8).] | | | | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX | | | (6) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8 ? INCHES X | | | 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 INCHES, AND | | | AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. | | | | | | * CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTAL PLANS MAY RESULT IN | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE | | | ($600.00). | | | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE | | | QUESTIONS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-02-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
04-02-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
04-02-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-04-02 14:37:41 | GENERAL COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING NOTE IN THE SITE PLAN TO | | | DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENCY WITH ZLDR S.94-142: ALL PUBLIC | | | UTILITIES SERVICE CONNECTIONS, INCLUDING TELEPHONE, | | | CABLE AND ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION SERVICE SHALL BE | | | INSTALLED UNDERGROUND. [2/10/2021 MODIFIED COMMENT: | | | THIS WAS PROVIDED AS A GENERAL COMMENT, BUT IT SHOULD | | | BE PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN TO GIVE STAFF SOME | | | ASSURANCES OF COMPLIANCE.] | | | | | | 2.) PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-207 OF THE ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS) THE INTENT OF A PLANNED | | | DEVELOPMENT IS TO ENCOURAGE THROUGH INCENTIVES, THE USE | | | OF INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES | | | TO CREATE MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT IN | | | THE CITY. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IN THE | | | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT HOW THIS IS BEING ACHIEVED IN | | | THE SITE DESIGN FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT. | | | [2/10/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: NOT ADDRESSED. THE | | | JUSTIFICATION LETTER DOES NOT EXPLAIN HOW THE CREATION | | | OF THE CPD WOULD BENEFIT THE CITY AND THE COMMUNITY | | | THROUGH THE USE OF INCENTIVES/WAIVERS TO CREATE A MORE | | | DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT.] | | | | | | 3.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE PUBLIC | | | UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR | | | WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE | | | COLLECTION SERVICES. PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY'S | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT (561) 494-1040 FOR | | | INFORMATION. [2/10/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: CITY SERVICE | | | LETTER NOT PROVIDED IN 3/9/2021 RESUBMITTAL PACKAGE.] | | | | | | 4.) PROVIDE LETTERS FROM THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC UTILITY | | | COMPANIES CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT | | | ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE | | | WITH THE PROVISION OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, FLU, FPL | | | AND COMCAST. [2/10/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: REQUESTED | | | LETTERS FROM THE UTILITY COMPANIES NOT PROVIDED IN | | | 3/9/2021 RESUBMITTAL PACKAGE.] | | | | | | 5.) EXPLAIN THE SITE PLAN TECHNIQUES THAT WILL BE | | | UTILIZED TO ASSIST IN THE MITIGATION OF WAIVER REQUEST | | | #3 (SETBACK REQUIREMENTS) IN THE JUSTIFICATION | | | STATEMENT. | | | | | | 6.) IT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO BREAK-UP THE SETBACK WAIVER | | | REQUESTS AND PROVIDE A SUMMARY AND EXPLANATION AND | | | MITIGATIVE MEASURES FOR EACH (I.E. FRONT SETBACK | | | (CLAREMORE AVENUE), SIDE INTERIOR SETBACK, ETC.) | | | | | | | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING OUTSTANDING/ADDED | | | COMMENTS FROM 2/10/2021 FOR THE SITE DATA TABULAR: A) | | | THE AGREED UPON PARKING CALCULATION FOR THE PROPOSED | | | TENNIS COURTS WAS 2 PARKING SPACES PER COURT (AS | | | UTILIZED IN THE FLAMINGO HEALTH CLUB PROJECT, ISPR | | | 18-07). THIS IS NOT REFLECTED IN THE PARKING | | | CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED INDOOR RECREATION | | | FACILITY. B) CHECK THE CANOPY AREA CALCULATIONS. THE | | | AMOUNT OF CANOPY AREA DID NOT ADD UP TO 6,038 SQ. FT. | | | AS NOTED IN THE TABULAR. | | | | | | 2.) CONSIDER UTILIZING A MORE ATTRACTIVE MATERIAL FOR | | | THE PROPOSED 6 FT. HIGH ROLLING GATE, SINCE IT WILL BE | | | VISIBLE FROM SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY. A DIFFERENT TYPE OF | | | GATE (VS. CLF) WOULD ENHANCE THE AESTHETIC APPEARANCE | | | OF THE PROJECT FROM THE VISIBLE ROW. | | | | | | 3.) LIGHT POLE FIXTURES SHALL BE SETBACK AT LEAST 5 FT. | | | FROM THE PROPERTY LINE(S). THERE SEEMS TO BE POLE | | | FIXTURE(S) THAT DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM SETBACK | | | FOR THE POLE FIXTURES. ALSO, PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE | | | PLACEMENT OF THE POLE FIXTURES WILL NOT BE IN CONFLICT | | | WITH THE PARKING OF VEHICLES. | | | | | | 4.) PLEASE CONSULT WITH THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO | | | DETERMINE IF THE ROLLOUT DUMPSTERS ARE ACCEPTABLE, AS | | | SPECIFIED IN #14 SITE PLAN COMMENTS RESPONSE TO STAFF | | | IN THE PPRC RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, DATED 3/8/2021 AND | | | RECEIVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - | | | PLANNING DIVISION ON 3/9/2021. | | | | | | 5.) THE PROPOSED LOCATION FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE | | | BUILDING BICYCLE RACK IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE BICYCLE | | | PARKING STANDARDS FOR RACK PLACEMENT. [ZLDR | | | S.94-485(Q)] | | | | | | 6.) PARKING AND STRIPING DETAIL SHOULD ACCURATELY | | | REFLECT THE PROPOSED PARKING STALLS FOR THE PROJECT | | | (I.E. UTILIZATION OF A 2 FT. CURB OVERHANG VS. WHEEL | | | STOPS). | | | | | | 7.) PROPOSED SIGN A DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM SETBACK | | | DISTANCE OF 24 FT. FROM ANOTHER LOT LINE. [ZLDR | | | S.94-408(D)(2)] | | | | | | | | | LIGHTING/PHOTOMETRIC PLAN: | | | | | | 1.) THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHALL SHOW ILLUMINATION | | | SPILLOVER BEYOND THE PROPERTY LINES OF THE PROJECT. | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT PER ZLDR S.94-207(D)(8), ANY SOURCE OF | | | ILLUMINATION FOR A CPD SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE FOOTCANDLE | | | AT OR BEYOND THE BOUNDARIES OF THE DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE | | | DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 2.) THE FOLLOWING NOTE SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE | | | PHOTOMETRIC PLAN (IN ADDITION TO THE SITE PLAN): ALL | | | OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE GLARE AND | | | SHALL BE ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE WAY FROM | | | ALL ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT | | | RESIDENCES, OR PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES. | | | | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX | | | (6) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 INCHES X | | | 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 INCHES, AND | | | AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. | | | | | | * CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTAL PLANS MAY RESULT IN | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE | | | ($600.00). | | | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE | | | QUESTIONS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-10-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
02-10-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
02-10-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-02-10 11:59:46 | GENERAL COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) SIGNED AND NOTARIZED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST | | | AFFIDAVIT IS MISSING FROM THE APPLICATION SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 2.) THE APPLICANT SHOULD SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR A | | | FUTURE LAND USE (FLU) MAP AMENDMENT TO CONSOLIDATE THE | | | SPLIT FLU OF THE PARCELS THAT MAKE UP THE PROPOSED | | | PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SITE. | | | | | | 3.) ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES SERVICE CONNECTIONS, INCLUDING | | | TELEPHONE, CABLE AND ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION SERVICE IN | | | COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS SHALL BE INSTALLED UNDERGROUND ON | | | ALL SITES GREATER THAN 30,000 SQ. FT. [ZLDR S.94-142 | | | F.] | | | | | | 4.) PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-207 OF THE ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS) THE INTENT OF A PLANNED | | | DEVELOPMENT IS TO ENCOURAGE THROUGH INCENTIVES, THE USE | | | OF INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES | | | TO CREATE MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT IN | | | THE CITY. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IN THE | | | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT HOW THIS IS BEING ACHIEVED IN | | | THE SITE DESIGN FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT. | | | | | | 5.) AS REQUIRED BY THE ZLDRS FOR A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, | | | PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IN THE JUSTIFICATION | | | STATEMENT ON COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF | | | THE ZLDRS: S.94-35(C) (SITE DESIGN QUALITATIVE | | | DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS), S.94-33 (COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | | | CONSISTENCY), ARTICLE XII (NATURAL RESOURCE | | | PROTECTION), AND ARTICLE XVII (FLOOD PREVENTION AND | | | CONTROL). [ZLDR S.94-207(B)(1)] | | | | | | 6.) A TPS LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY ENGINEERING | | | DEPARTMENT-TRAFFIC DIVISION, STATING THAT THE PROPOSED | | | PROJECT MEETS THE TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) | | | OF PALM BEACH COUNTY IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO SCHEDULING | | | FOR PLANNING BOARD. | | | | | | 7.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE PUBLIC | | | UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR | | | WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE | | | COLLECTION SERVICES. PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY'S | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT (561) 494-1040 FOR | | | INFORMATION. | | | | | | 8.) PROVIDE LETTERS FROM THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC UTILITY | | | COMPANIES CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT | | | ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE | | | WITH THE PROVISION OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, FLU, FPL | | | AND COMCAST. | | | | | | | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) PLEASE ADDRESS/CLARIFY THE FOLLOWING IN THE SITE | | | DATA TABULAR: A) THE PROJECT NAME (ACCORDING TO THE | | | APPLICATION SUBMITTAL) IS GREENE SCHOOL CPD (NOT | | | BISCAYNE TENNIS CENTER). B) THE PROJECT NUMBER IS: | | | PLANNING BOARD CASE NO. 1878 (Z21010029). C) THE | | | PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION IS LISTED AS | | | COMMERCIAL (C). PLEASE CLARIFY IF A FLUMA APPLICATION | | | IS TO BE SUBMITTED TO CONSOLIDATE THE FLU OF THE | | | PARCELS WITHIN THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. D) CHECK SITE | | | CALCULATIONS - SOME OF THE NUMBERS PROVIDED IN THE | | | TABLE ARE INACCURATE/INCORRECT AND/OR MISSING | | | (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: PROJECT SITE AREA, | | | CANOPY AREA CALCULATIONS, SCHOOL CALCULATIONS WHICH | | | DOES NOT INCLUDE BREEZEWAY, PARKING CALCULATIONS, | | | LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS, BICYCLE PARKING, ETC.). E) | | | BUILDING HEIGHT PROVIDED DOES NOT MATCH THE BUILDING | | | HEIGHT IN THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. | | | | | | 2.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE PROPERTY | | | DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS TABLE: A) CHECK REQUIRED AND | | | PROPOSED CALCULATIONS FOR: MINIMUM LANDSCAPE AREA B) | | | REQUIRED FRONT, SIDE STREET AND SIDE INTERIOR IS | | | INCORRECT. C) A NOTATION THAT A WAIVER IS BEING | | | REQUESTED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS THAT CANNOT | | | BE MET SHALL BE PROVIDED. D) PROVIDE A NOTE THAT STATES | | | THE 0 FT. SETBACK ALONG THE FEC IS PERMITTED. | | | | | | 3.) THE PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK ALONG CLAREMORE | | | AVENUE IS INCORRECTLY LABELED AS THE SIDE SETBACK. THE | | | PROPERTY HAS MULTIPLE FRONTAGES AND PER THE CITY'S | | | ZLDRS, THE FRONTAGE ALONG CLAREMORE AVENUE IS DEFINED | | | AS A FRONT LOT LINE. | | | | | | 4.) THE REQUIRED BUILDING SETBACK FROM THE FRONT LOT | | | LINE IS 20 FT. ACCORDING TO THE PLANS, A 5 FT. SETBACK | | | IS PROVIDED, AND THEREFORE, A WAIVER SHALL BE REQUIRED. | | | [ZLDR S.94-145(2)] | | | | | | 5.) THE REQUIRED INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK IS 15 FT. | | | ACCORDING TO THE PLANS, A 5 FT. INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK | | | IS PROVIDED, AND THEREFORE, A WAIVER SHALL BE REQUIRED. | | | [ZLDR S.94-145(2)] | | | | | | 6.) A ROLLING GATE IS PROVIDED WITHIN THE PORTION OF | | | BISCAYNE DRIVE PROPOSED FOR ABANDONMENT. THERE DOES NOT | | | SEEM TO BE A VEHICULAR TURNAROUND DESIGNED AT THE GATE. | | | PROVISIONS FOR AN ADEQUATE TURNAROUND SHALL BE | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | 7.) HOW HIGH IS THE ROLLING GATE, AND WHAT MATERIAL | | | WILL THE ROLLING GATE BE? | | | | | | 8.) VISIBILITY TRIANGLES SHALL BE DRAWN IN ACCORDANCE | | | TO THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF ZLDR S.94-305(E). THE | | | VISIBILITY TRIANGLE(S) DEPICTED AT THE CORNER OF | | | BISCAYNE DRIVE AND SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY SEEM TO BE | | | INCORRECT. | | | | | | 9.) ARE THERE ANY LIGHT POLES/FIXTURES PROPOSED FOR THE | | | PROJECT? IF SO, PLEASE ILLUSTRATE IN THE PLANS AND | | | INCLUDE SETBACK DISTANCE FROM THE PROPERTY LINE(S). | | | | | | 10.) THE PARKING WITHIN THE PROJECT BOUNDARIES SEEMS TO | | | BE INCORRECTLY TABULATED. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR | | | CONSISTENCY. | | | | | | 11.) DIMENSION OUT THE NEW PARALLEL PARKING SPACES ON | | | FLAMINGO DRIVE. | | | | | | 12.) SHOW DIMENSIONS FOR THE 5 COMPACT PARKING SPACES | | | PROVIDED FOR THE PROJECT. MINIMUM DIMENSIONS FOR | | | COMPACT PARKING SPACES SHALL BE 8 FT. X 16 FT. | | | (90-DEGREE PARKING). [ZLDR S.94-485, FIGURE XV-2] | | | | | | 13.) PROVIDE AN OPAQUE FENCE ALONG THE PROPOSED LOADING | | | ZONE AREA (VS. EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE) TO SCREEN THE | | | USE FROM THE ABUTTING PROPERTIES. | | | | | | 14.) PROVIDE AN AUTO-TURN ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED | | | LOADING ZONE AREA TO DEMONSTRATE THAT TRUCKS CAN EASILY | | | MANEUVER IN AND OUT OF THE LOADING AREA. | | | | | | 15.) PER THE ZLDRS, ONE (1) 10 FT. X 25 FT. LOADING | | | ZONE IS REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE | | | BUILDING, AND TWO (2) 10 FT. X 50 FT. LOADING ZONES ARE | | | REQUIRED FOR THE INDOOR RECREATION BUILDING. IF THE | | | LOADING SPACE REQUIREMENT CANNOT BE MET, A WAIVER | | | REQUEST WILL BE NECESSARY. INCONSISTENT INFORMATION HAS | | | BEEN PROVIDED IN BOTH THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AND | | | PLANS. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. [ZLDR S. | | | 94-485(P)] | | | | | | 16.) ADDITIONAL BICYCLE PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED FOR | | | THE PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING AND INDOOR RECREATION | | | BUILDING. BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE | | | DESIGN AND LOCATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDRS AND OF | | | THE CITY?S BICYCLE PARKING STANDARDS MANUAL. [ZLDR | | | S.94-485(Q)] | | | | | | 17.) PROVIDE DETAILS ON THE FOLLOWING: A) DUMPSTER | | | ENCLOSURE. B) FREESTANDING SIGNAGE. | | | | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS: | | | | | | 1.) FINAL ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS SHALL BE SIGNED AND | | | SEALED BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED ARCHITECT. | | | | | | 2.) CLEARLY LABEL WHICH BUILDING IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE | | | ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS (I.E. INDOOR RECREATION | | | BUILDING/TENNIS FACILITY, ETC.). | | | | | | 3.) ARE THERE FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS AVAILABLE FOR | | | THE CONVERSION OF THE EXISTING WAREHOUSE BUILDING TO AN | | | ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE SPACE? | | | | | | 4.) PARKING CALCULATIONS INDICATE THAT THERE IS 2,500 | | | SQUARE FEET OF FITNESS/EXERCISE WITHIN THE TENNIS | | | FACILITY; HOWEVER, THERE IS NO INDICATION OF AN AREA | | | DEDICATED TO EXERCISE (ASIDE FROM THE INDOOR COURTS) IN | | | THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | | | | 5.) PLEASE NOTE THAT A FITNESS ROOM IS DEPICTED IN THE | | | CONCEPT PLANS FOR THE INDOOR TENNIS FACILITY; HOWEVER, | | | IT IS NOT DEPICTED IN THE FLOOR PLAN. PLEASE ADDRESS | | | FOR CONSISTENCY. | | | | | | 6.) THE APPLICANT SHOULD PROVIDE ADDITIONAL | | | ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT ON THE SOUTH BUILDING FACADE OF | | | THE INDOOR TENNIS FACILITY, FACING THE ABUTTING | | | COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES. | | | | | | | | | SIGNAGE: | | | | | | 1.) NO INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THE PROPOSED MONUMENT | | | SIGN LOCATED AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE SCHOOL BUILDING | | | (I.E. DETAILS, SIGN SETBACKS FROM PROPERTY LINE(S)). | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT PURSUANT TO ZLDR S.94-305(B)(13), | | | REQUIRED FRONT, SIDE AND REAR SETBACKS SHALL BE OPEN | | | AND UNOBSTRUCTED BY STRUCTURES. | | | | | | 2.) WILL THE PROJECT BE UTILIZING THE EXISTING | | | MCARTHUR?S MONUMENT SIGN? IF SO, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE PROPOSAL FOR THE EXISTING | | | SIGN. | | | | | | 3.) PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE IN THE PLANS IF THE PROJECT | | | IS TO FULLY COMPLY WITH THE SIGN REGULATIONS OF ARTICLE | | | XIII OF THE ZLDRS (WALL AND FREESTANDING). | | | | | | | | | LIGHTING (PHOTOMETRICS): | | | | | | 1.) A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED WITH THE | | | SUBMITTAL. ALL SOURCE OF ILLUMINATION LOCATED WITHIN | | | THE PROPOSED CPD SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE FOOT-CANDLE AT OR | | | BEYOND THE BOUNDARIES OF SUCH DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. | | | [ZLDR S.94-207(D)(8)] | | | | | | 2.) INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING NOTE WITHIN THE PLAN: "ALL | | | OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE GLARE AND | | | SHALL BE ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE AWAY FROM | | | ALL ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT | | | RESIDENCES, OR PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES." | | | | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX | | | (6) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 INCHES X | | | 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 INCHES, AND | | | AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. | | | | | | * CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTAL PLANS MAY RESULT IN | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE | | | ($600.00). | | | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE | | | QUESTIONS. |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |