 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z21010013
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z21010013 |
| Review Stop |
AIPP |
ART IN PUBLIC PLACES |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-29-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
scwelter |
Date |
01-29-2021 |
Time |
15:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
scwelter |
Date |
01-29-2021 |
Time |
15:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-05-12 10:01:37 | MET WITH DEVELOPER - POTENTIAL ART SITES MUST BE | | | IDENTIFIED ON THE SITE PLAN - | | | PER CODE - ARTWORK SHALL BE CLEARLY DEMONSTRATED ON ALL | | | SITE-PLANS SUBMITTED FOR CITY APPROVALS. | | | | | | DEVELOPER HAS NOT RESPONDED TO THE PUBLIC ART | | | REQUIREMENT. MUST CONTACT [email protected] AND COMPLETE | | | ART ASSESSMENT APPLICATION. | | | PUBLIC ART FAILED 05.12.2021 | | 2021-01-29 15:01:05 | PUBLIC ART 1% PROGRAM - BY ORDINANCE ALL PRIVATE | | | DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, INCLUDING NEW CONSTRUCTION, OR | | | THE RENOVATION OR IMPROVEMENT OF AN EXISTING BUILDING, | | | WHERE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER | | | THAN $500,000 ARE SUBJECT TO THE ART ASSESSMENT. ALL | | | BUILDINGS WITHIN NEW PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS SHALL BE | | | ASSESSED CUMULATIVELY TOWARDS THIS PUBLIC ART | | | REQUIREMENT, EVEN IF THE BUILDINGS ARE PERMITTED | | | SEPARATELY OR DEVELOPED IN PHASES. OPTION 1: INSTALL | | | AND ARTWORK ON THE DEVELOPMENT SITE VALUED IN AN AMOUNT | | | NOT LESS THAN ONE PERCENT OF THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION | | | COSTS; OR OPTION 2: CONTRIBUTE AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO 75 | | | PERCENT (-25%) OF ONE PERCENT OF THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION | | | COSTS FOR DEPOSIT TO THE PUBLIC ART ACCOUNT. | | | THIS DEVELOPMENT IS SUBJECT TO THE ART ASSESSMENT. | | | PLEASE EMAIL SYBILLE WELTER [email protected] SUBJECT | | | LINE: ART ASSESSMENT APPLICATION - WITH YOUR PROJECT | | | NUMBER | | | FAILED UNTIL ART ASSESSMENT COMPLETED, SIGNED AND | | | RETURNED, CALL 561.822.1521 WITH FURTHER QUESTIONS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-10-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
02-10-2021 |
Time |
19:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
02-10-2021 |
Time |
19:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-02-10 19:59:27 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AN ASBESTOS | | | SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT | | | REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963, | | | OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 3. EXIT DISCHARGE FROM STAIR 3 AND 4. SITE PLAN, SHEET | | | SP-1, AND LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN, SHEET A-1.1, DO NOT SHOW | | | ANY DOOR FOR EXIT DISCHARGE FROM STAIR 3 AND 4 LEADING | | | OUT OF THE BUILDING. | | | | | | 4. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THE PARKING TABLE OD | | | SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1, SHOWS THAT EIGHT ACCESSIBLE | | | PARKING SPACES ARE PROPOSED. THEREFORE TWO VAN | | | ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED, BUT NONE ARE | | | LABELLED AS SUCH ON THE PLANS. PER SECTION 208.2.4 OF | | | FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX REQUIRED | | | ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING | | | STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND DESIGNED IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY | | | CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT | | | SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE) | | | | | | 5. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR | | | THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, | | | AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 6. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND | | | OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF | | | OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE | | | VERIFIED. | | | | | | 7. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES | | | NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO | | | MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL | | | BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE | | | EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED | | | TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR | | | OTHER APPROVED METHODS. | | | | | | 8. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. IF ANY OF THE RETAIL SPACES ARE | | | TO BE RESTAURANTS A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE | | | REQUIRED. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE | | | AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT TIM LARGE, CHIEF PLUMBING | | | INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561) | | | 805-6692, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 9. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, | | | GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND | | | OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS, | | | SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 10. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND | | | CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF | | | CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. | | | | | | 11. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER | | | AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY, | | | INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE | | | CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION | | | THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY. | | | | | | 12. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT | | | WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL | | | HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION | | | OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, | | | CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT | | | (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 13. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT | | | TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE | | | ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP | | | ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC | | | PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-15-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
05-15-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
05-15-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-05-15 08:30:22 | COMMENTS PER RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, CITY | | | WPB ENG SERVICES, (561) 494-1098 [email protected] | | | | | | PUBLIC UTILITIES MAY NOT ALLOW NEW METERS TO BE | | | INSTALLED IN SIDEWALK. PLEASE CONTACT FIELD CUSTOMER | | | SERVICE SUPERVISOR MARK HURLEY AT 561-822-2262. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD | | | CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, | | | PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]: | | | -PLEASE ENSURE 4 INCH METER SLAB ON NORTH PARCEL IS NOT | | | OVER THE BURIED ELECTRIC UTILITY. | | | | | | -ON NORTH SIDE OF EUCALYPTUS ON WEST EDGE OF GARAGE | | | ENTRANCE ON UTILITY PLAN, THERE IS A MARKED AREA WITH | | | AN UNMARKED UTILITY. PLEASE LABEL WHAT THOSE ARE. | | | | | | -ON SOUTH PARCEL, 1 INCH METER BOXES APPEAR TO BE IN | | | CONCRETE. DO NOT WANT METER BOXES IN CONCRETE. PLEASE | | | EXTEND LANDSCAPE AREA TO INCLUDE METER BOXES, OR | | | RELOCATE THOSE BOXES SOUTH SLIGHTLY AS LONG AS NO | | | CONFLICT WITH TREE ROOTS. | | | | | | -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL: LABEL PIPING BETWEEN | | | SMALL METERS AND SMALL BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES WITH PIPE | | | SIZE AND MATERIAL TYPE. | | | | | | -PIPING BETWEEN SMALL METERS AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES | | | RUNNING UNDER CONCRETE OR STRUCTURES SHOULD BE SLEEVED | | | WITH 3? SCH. 80 PVC. | | | | | | -ATTEMPT TO HAVE AT LEAST 3 FEET CLEARANCE DISTANCE | | | BETWEEN 4 INCH WATER SERVICE PIPE AND LIGHT POLE WITH | | | ELECTRIC BOX ON SOUTH PARCEL. | | | | | | -CANNOT FIND WATER DEMAND CALCULATIONS ON UTILITY | | | PLANS. PLEASE ADD. | | | | | | -VERIFY THE EXISTING WATER MAIN SIZE ON DIXIE (SOUTH | | | PARCEL). WPB GIS SHOWS 12 INCH. | | | | | | -TAPPING VALVE ICONS NOT SHOWN ON DIXIE FOR LARGER | | | WATER SERVICE PIPES. | | | | | | -PLEASE MAKE WESTERN PROPERTY LINE CLEARER AND LABEL IT | | | ON SOUTH PARCEL UTILITY PLANS. | | | | | | -LOOKS LIKE AN EASEMENT FOR SEWER PIPE GOING SOUTH ONTO | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OF SOUTH PARCEL, BUT IT IS NOT | | | LABELED ON UTILITY PLAN. PLEASE ADD LABEL IF EASEMENT. | | | ALSO LABEL SEWER PIPING IN EASEMENT WITH PIPE SIZE AND | | | MATERIAL TYPE. | | | | | | -LOOKS LIKE MANY POSSIBLE CONFLICTS WITH THE WATER | | | SERVICES AND TREES IN THE ROW. PLEASE VERIFY IF ROOTS | | | MAY ENCROACH ON WATER UTILITY PIPING AND ADD ROOT | | | BARRIERS AS NEEDED. | | | | | | -ON THE SOUTHERN BUILDING SERVICE DETAIL, PLEASE VERIFY | | | THE DARK STRUCTURE IS JUST A ROOF, AND NOT A WALL | | | CONFLICT WITH BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY. | | | | | | -WILL THERE STILL BE CROSS WALKS AT THE INTERSECTIONS | | | WITH DIXIE? | | | | | | -SOME PRIVATE WATER PIPES ARE UNDER SEATWALLS. THOSE | | | PIPES WOULD BE PRIVATELY MAINTAINED. | | | | | | -LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS SEATWALL ON SOUTH PARCEL AT THE | | | FAR SOUTH END, BUT NOT ON CIVIL PLAN. WHICH PLAN IS | | | ACCURATE? IF SEATWALL IS THERE, PLEASE VERIFY IT CAN BE | | | IN EASEMENT, AND CAN BE OVER DRAINAGE PIPE. | | | | | | -SITE PLAN SHOWS METER BOX NEAR DIXIE AND EUCALYPTUS | | | INTERSECTION THAT IS NOT ON CIVIL PLANS. PLEASE VERIFY | | | AND UPDATE PLANS. | | | | | | -LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS A TREE OVER SEWER PIPING ON SOUTH | | | PARCEL JUST OVER THE SW PROPERTY LINE. IF PROPOSED, | | | THAT TREE LOCATION MAY CREATE MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS. IF | | | THAT SEWER PIPE IS PRIVATELY OWNED, PLEASE ALSO ADD | | | PRIVATE TO LABEL. | | | | | | -PROPOSED 6 INCH BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY ON NORTH PARCEL | | | APPEARS TO BE IN 10 FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT FOR ELECTRIC. | | | IS THERE ANY WAY TO HAVE IT ADJUSTED SLIGHTLY SO NOT IN | | | EITHER UTILITY EASEMENT? | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-21-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rroossan |
Date |
03-21-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
03-21-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-21 12:28:05 | COMMENTS PER RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, CITY | | | WPB ENG SERVICES, (561) 494-1098 [email protected] | | | | | | SHOW EASEMENTS AND WATER METERS FOR ALL PROPOSED WATER | | | CONNECTIONS. | | | BACKFLOWS SHALL BE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. | | | LABEL IRRIGATION BACKFLOWS. | | | INCLUDE IRRIGATION AND FIRE IN WATER DEMAND CHART. | | | LABEL SIZE OF SANITARY LATERAL TO BE GROUTED IN PLACE. | | | IF IN ROW AND LARGER THAN 2 IN., REMOVE. | | | | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD | | | CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, | | | PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]: | | | | | | -VERIFY THAT ALUMINUM RAIL FENCE ON SOUTH LOT IS | | | ALLOWED TO BE INSTALLED IN DRAINAGE, SANITARY SEWER | | | LINE, & FPL EASEMENTS. | | | | | | -THERE ARE PROPOSED TREES IN DRAINAGE EASEMENT NEAR | | | POOL. VERIFY THAT IS ACCEPTABLE. | | | | | | -SHEET C-02 SHOWS A TRIANGULAR AREA/OBJECT ON THE EAST | | | SIDE OF THE POOL THAT IS IN THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT. WHAT | | | IS IT? | | | | | | -BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES CANNOT BE LOCATED IN UTILITY | | | EASEMENTS. | | | | | | -IF DIXIE HIGHWAY IS BEING CUT/EXCAVATED, THEN IT WOULD | | | NEED PAVEMENT RESTORATION TO OVERSEEING AGENCY?S | | | STANDARDS. | | | | | | -PROPOSED 1 INCH METERS AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES NEAR | | | WEST SIDE OF PROPERTY DO NOT APPEAR TO HAVE ACCEPTABLE | | | LOCATIONS. ONE OF THEM ALSO LOOKS TO HAVE SERVICE LINE | | | RUNNING UNDER A STRUCTURE. WILL LIKELY NEED TO BE | | | RELOCATED DURING FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | -IF THE EXISTING WATER SERVICE LINES ARE NOT SUITABLE | | | FOR THE METER (SUCH AS SMALLER THAN METER SIZE), THEN | | | NEW WATER SERVICES MAY BE NEEDED. | | | | | | -RELOCATED LIGHT POLES MAY NEED SIDEWALK RESTORATION. | | | | | | -DID NOT SEE ALL FIRE HYDRANTS LABELED ON CIVIL PLANS. | | | | | | -WILL THE 1 INCH METER FOR THE SOUTH LOT BE THE WATER | | | SOURCE FOR THE 8 STORY BUILDING AND POOL? | | | | | | -ABOVE-GROUND WATER METER WITH MAINTENANCE BYPASS IS | | | NOT SHOWN FOR THE 4 INCH DIP WATER SERVICE. | | | | | | -COULD NOT FIND A FIRELINE WATER SERVICE AND BACKFLOW | | | ASSEMBLY FOR THE SOUTH LOT, BUT THERE IS AN FDC. PLEASE | | | UPDATE PLANS OR EXPLAIN WHY THERE IS NO FIRELINE. | | | | | | -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, LABEL ALL EXISTING | | | WATER SERVICES WITH PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL TYPE. | | | | | | -WPB SANITARY COLLECTIONS VERIFIED THAT THERE IS A | | | SEWER MAIN RUNNING ACROSS NORTH LOT. THEY ADVISED IT | | | CANNOT BE ALTERED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM WPB UTILITIES | | | ENGINEERING. | | | | | | -THERE ARE TWO DRAIN BASINS AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF | | | PROPERTY THAT ARE NOT LABELED WITH ELEVATION | | | INFORMATION. | | | | | | -WILL EUCALYPTUS HAVE TO BE EXCAVATED TO TIE INTO | | | EXISTING 4 INCH AND 6 INCH DIP WATER SERVICES? | | | | | | -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL: 1) SUBMIT SEPARATE | | | SHEET WITH ALL WATER SERVICE STANDARD DETAILS THAT WILL | | | BE USED 2) ADD WATER DEMAND CALCULATIONS TO WATER PLAN. | | | 3) ADD PROPERTY ADDRESSES TO CIVIL PLANS. | | | | | | -IF 20 FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT IS NOT ELIMINATED, THEN | | | STRUCTURES COULD NOT BE BUILT IN/OVER IT. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-04-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
02-04-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
02-04-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-02-04 11:32:26 | COMMENTS PER RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, CITY | | | WPB ENG SERVICES, (561) 494-1098 [email protected] | | | | | | 1. THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF | | | REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY | | | AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND | | | WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. TO VIEW | | | DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER | | | ENGINEERING RELATED DOCUMENTS, OPEN A BROWSER IN CHROME | | | AND GO TO: WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGDOCS . TO LOGIN, UNDER | | | ?EMAIL? ENTER [email protected] ; UNDER ?PASSWORD? ENTER | | | SIMPLE321# | | | THERE ARE 4 PAGES OF AVAILABLE ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS | | | FOR YOUR USE. | | | 2. CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, | | | FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08, ADOPTED | | | SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18) CHAPTER 90 | | | UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. SEC. 90-7. | | | POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER SERVICE | | | FACILITIES OF THE CITY: | | | THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE | | | CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY | | | BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS, | | | BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION. | | | 3. AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR | | | MORE INFORMATION, OPEN A BROWSER IN CHROME AND GO TO: | | | WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGDOCS .TO LOGIN, UNDER ?EMAIL? ENTER | | | [email protected] ; UNDER ?PASSWORD? ENTER SIMPLE321# | | | CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL IS ON PAGE 4. | | | 4. PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY | | | OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC | | | RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF | | | YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE | | | MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL | | | IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT | | | [email protected] OR 561-494-1040 FOR FURTHER | | | ASSISTANCE. | | | 5. PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS | | | OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES, | | | INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND | | | SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, | | | METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE | | | SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING | | | GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, | | | ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL | | | INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER | | | LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE | | | PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN | | | VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. | | | PLEASE SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT | | | MATERIAL. ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL | | | EXISTING AND PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, | | | INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & | | | TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL | | | UTILITY CROSSINGS. | | | 6. CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY | | | ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY | | | ROW. | | | 7. PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE | | | DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB | | | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION). | | | 8. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND | | | PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM | | | AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE | | | PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER. | | | 9. SHOW VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION INFORMATION | | | (NAVD 88 AND NGVD 29). | | | 10. PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND | | | STORMWATER ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE. | | | 11. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND | | | IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED | | | AREAS. | | | 12. PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR | | | PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS. | | | 13. PLEASE LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE | | | APPLICABLE. | | | 14. PLEASE PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED | | | LOCATION OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION. | | | 15. COORDINATE WITH MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE | | | SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING | | | PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT | | | HIM AT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected] | | | 16. PROVIDE DEDICATED UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS | | | FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. | | | 17. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT SUBMITTED CIVIL PLANS ARE | | | SHOWING UP TO DATE ASBUILT INFRASTRUCTURE INFORMATION. | | | PLEASE CLEARLY INDICATE EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER AND | | | SEWER UTILITIES. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD | | | CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, | | | PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]: | | | | | | -WPB SERVICE AVAILABILITY LETTER SAID WATER LINES WOULD | | | NEED TO BE UPSIZED AND WASTEWATER UPGRADED. PLEASE | | | DETAIL UPSIZING AND UPGRADING PROPOSED. | | | | | | -ADD SIZE OF WATER METERS AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES. IF | | | DOMESTIC WATER METERS ARE 3INCHES OR LARGER, THEY WILL | | | NEED TO BE ABOVE-GROUND. | | | | | | -ADD LABEL TO DOMESTIC AND RESIDENTIAL BACKFLOW | | | ASSEMBLIES THAT THEY NEED TO BE RP TYPE. | | | | | | -CANNOT HAVE WATER METER BOXES AND WATER SERVICES IN | | | DRIVEWAYS OR DRIVEWAY APPROACHES. | | | | | | -RECOMMEND PARALLEL/DUAL BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES FOR THE | | | DOMESTIC WATER SERVICES TO DECREASE WATER OUTAGES | | | DURING BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY MAINTENANCE. | | | | | | -LABEL ALL FIRE HYDRANTS ON WATER/UTILITY ENGINEERING | | | PLAN. | | | | | | -VERIFY FDC DISTANCE TO FIRE HYDRANT IS ACCEPTABLE. | | | | | | -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL: ADD BLOWUP DETAILS | | | OF WATER METERS AND BACKFLOW AREAS, LABEL ALL WATER | | | SERVICE PIPE MATERIAL AND SIZE, ADD WATER SERVICE | | | STANDARD DETAILS USED | | | | | | -ONE DDCVA LOOKS TO BE CONFLICTING WITH A WALL. | | | | | | -VERIFY IF ALL WATER METERS AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ARE | | | OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDINGS. | | | | | | -WHAT IS THE VERTICAL CLEARANCE DISTANCE FROM BOTTOM OF | | | BRIDGE TO STREET? | | | | | | -AN AERIAL BRIDGE OVER CITY WPB R/W WOULD REQUIRE CITY | | | WPB APPROVAL. | | | | | | -TREE APPEARS TO CONFLICT WITH BRIDGE. | | | | | | -THERE APPEAR TO BE SEVERAL TREE CONFLICTS WITH THE | | | METERED WATER SERVICES. PLEASE CREATE BETTER CLEARANCE | | | AND ADD ROOT BARRIERS. | | | | | | -VERIFY THAT FIRE HYDRANT ON SOUTH SIDE OF EUCALYPTUS | | | IS PROPOSED AND NOT EXISTING. | | | | | | -MORE DIRECTION ON EXISTING WATER SERVICES WILL BE | | | PROVIDED AT FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, BUT LIKELY BE | | | REQUIRED TO REMOVE UNUSED ONES. | | | | | | -THERE ARE EXISTING WATER AND SEWER MAIN UTILITIES IN | | | MIDDLE OF THE NORTH PROPERTY. WHERE ARE THEY BEING | | | RELOCATED? | | | | | | -SW PROPERTY COMMERCIAL METER AND BACKFLOW ARE TOO FAR | | | FROM PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | -SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS. | | | | | | -WILL THERE BE AN FDC FOR THE SW PROPERTY? | | | | | | | | | COMMENT PER MANNY GONZALEZ, AS OF 2-11-2021. CALL | | | 561-818-1322: | | | | | | SEWER RUNNING EAST OF NORTH LOT WILL NEED A MANHOLE AT | | | PROPERTY LINE. | | | FIRE DEPT. WILL REQUIRE NEW FIRELINE TO BE DIRECTLY | | | FROM A CITY WATERMAIN AND NOT SPLIT OFF DOMESTIC WATER | | | METER. | | | PROPOSED SEWER SHALL BE 8 IN. DIAMETER TO N. DIXIE HWY. | | | THIS WILL REQUIRE A 5 FT. DIAMETER MANHOLE WITH INSIDE | | | DROP. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-15-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
09-15-2021 |
Time |
10:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
09-15-2021 |
Time |
10:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-09-15 10:21:28 | FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES. | | | | | | FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES NOT | | | CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT THE | | | APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-06-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
05-06-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
05-06-2021 |
Time |
13:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-05-06 13:38:08 | FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES. | | | | | | FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES NOT | | | CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT THE | | | APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-05-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
02-05-2021 |
Time |
11:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
02-05-2021 |
Time |
11:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-02-05 11:38:37 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT.HOWEVER, THE FOLLOWING ARE PROVIDED TO | | | ENSURE COMPLIANCE ON PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | 6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A, | | | PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE, | | | INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE | | | OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES) | | | | | | 7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA | | | 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS | | | STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE | | | BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE | | | BEING CONSTRUCTED. | | | | | | SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, | | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU | | | PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION. | | | | | | IT IS RECOMMENDED FOR HIGH RISES HAVE TWO SEPARATE FDC | | | LOCATIONS REMOTELY LOCATED. | | | | | | ONLY ONE FDC WAS CLEARLY LOCATED AND IT IS NOT CLEAR IF | | | THIS FDC PROVIDES PROTECTION TO BOTH BUILDINGS. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE GREATER DETAIL. | | | | | | 7A. PER NFPA 14 | | | | | | 6.4.5.4* FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED | | | NOT MORE THAN 100 FT (30.5 M) FROM THE NEAREST FIRE | | | HYDRANT CONNECTED TO AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY. | | | | | | 7B. PLEASE REVIEW THE DISTANCE SEPARATION OF THE | | | STAIRWELLS AS THE SEPARATION DISTANCE IS NOT INDICATED. | | | | | | 7.3.2.2* WHERE THE MOST REMOTE PORTION OF A | | | NON-SPRINKLERED FLOOR OR STORY IS LOCATED IN EXCESS OF | | | 150 FT (45.7 M) OF TRAVEL DISTANCE FROM A HOSE | | | CONNECTION IN OR ADJACENT TO A REQUIRED EXIT OR THE | | | MOST REMOTE PORTION OF A SPRINKLERED FLOOR OR STORY | | | IS LOCATED IN EXCESS OF 200 FT (61 M) OF TRAVEL | | | DISTANCE FROM A HOSE CONNECTION IN OR ADJACENT TO A | | | REQUIRED EXIT, ADDITIONAL HOSE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED, IN APPROVED LOCATIONS, WHERE REQUIRED BY THE | | | LOCAL FIRE DEPARTMENT OR THE AHJ. | | | | | | 7C. PER NFPA 1 | | | | | | 18.3 WATER SUPPLIES. | | | | | | 18.3.1* AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING | | | THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED TO ALL PREMISES UPON WHICH FACILITIES, | | | BUILDINGS, OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS ARE HEREAFTER | | | CONSTRUCTED OR MOVED INTO THE JURISDICTION. THE | | | APPROVED WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | SECTION 18.4. | | | | | | PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004, | | | FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE | | | POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF | | | APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT, | | | CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR | | | AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER | | | SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA) | | | AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS | | | PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS. | | | FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE | | | PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES? | | | | | | 7D. THE LOCATION OF THE DDCV FIRE LINE LOCATION SHALL | | | MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE | | | COORDINATED WITH THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S | | | ENGINEERS OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S | | | PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE. | | | | | | 8. A CLASS ?A? NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM | | | SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP | | | DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY | | | INSTALLATION. | | | | | | 9. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7 | | | KEYWAY SYSTEM. | | | | | | ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S | | | EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA | | | B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS. | | | | | | ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN | | | WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL | | | LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET | | | MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER | | | ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN | | | AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE | | | IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION. | | | | | | 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED | | | ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION. | | | ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE | | | BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND | | | FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET | | | OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER | | | ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES. | | | | | | 12. COMMAND ROOM | | | | | | THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1, | | | CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN | | | THE FOLLOWING FEATURES: | | | 11.9.1 THE LOCATION, DESIGN, CONTENT, AND FIRE | | | DEPARTMENT ACCESS OF THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL | | | BE APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. | | | | | | 11.9.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE SEPARATED | | | FROM THE REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING BY A FIRE BARRIER | | | HAVING A FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 1 | | | HOUR. | | | | | | 11.9.3 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER ROOM SHALL BE A | | | MINIMUM OF 96 FT2 (8.9 M2) WITH A MINIMUM DIMENSION OF | | | 8 FT (2.4 M). | | | | | | A. PER FL BLDG CODE;(MORE STRICT) IT SHALL BE A MINIMUM | | | OF 200 FT SQUARED WITH A MINIMUM DIMENSION OF 10 FT. | | | B. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM. | | | C. A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED | | | ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM | | | D. SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL | | | FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF | | | EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING | | | EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS AND THE LOCATION | | | OF FIRE WALLS, FIRE BARRIERS, FIRE PARTITIONS, SMOKE | | | BARRIERS AND SMOKE PARTITIONS | | | E. A WORK TABLE. | | | F. IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN | | | FOR THE BUILDING. | | | G. THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | | | CONTROL UNIT. | | | H. ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION OF | | | THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL | | | I. STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR DISTRIBUTION | | | SYSTEMS. | | | J. CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS SIMULTANEOUSLY | | | K. SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY | | | PANELS | | | L. EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS | | | M. FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS | | | N. GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND | | | TRANSFER FEATURES. | | | O. PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED | | | BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE | | | P. CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL | | | Q. ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME | | | A17.1. | | | R. ELEVATOR EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER SELECTOR | | | SWITCH(ES), WHERE EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER IS | | | PROVIDED | | | 11.8.6* EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER. | | | 11.8.6.1 AN EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE PROVIDED | | | IN A | | | LOCATION APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. | | | 11.8.6.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL CONTAIN THE | | | FOLLOWING: | | | (1) VOICE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM PANELS AND CONTROLS | | | (2) FIRE DEPARTMENT TWO-WAY TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION | | | SERVICE | | | PANELS AND CONTROLS WHERE REQUIRED BY ANOTHER SECTION | | | OF THIS | | | CODE | | | (3) FIRE DETECTION AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATION | | | PANELS | | | (4) ELEVATOR FLOOR LOCATION AND OPERATION ANNUNCIATORS | | | (5) ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME | | | A17.1/CSA B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS AND ESCALATORS | | | (6) ELEVATOR EMERGENCY POWER SELECTOR SWITCH(ES) WHERE | | | PROVIDED | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME A17.1/CSA B44 | | | (7) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATERFLOW ANNUNCIATORS | | | (8) EMERGENCY GENERATOR STATUS INDICATORS | | | (9) CONTROLS FOR ANY AUTOMATIC STAIRWAY DOOR UNLOCKING | | | SYSTEM | | | (10) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS | | | (11) TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED | | | ACCESS TO THE | | | PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM | | | (12) STAIRWAY VIDEO MONITORING EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED BY | | | 11.8.8 | | | | | | 13. RADIO | | | | | | NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY | | | RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES. | | | 11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM | | | RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT | | | COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL | | | DETERMINED BY THE AHJ. | | | | | | NFPA 72, 24.5.2* TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS | | | ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS. | | | | | | 24.5.2.2 RADIO COVERAGE. RADIO COVERAGE SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE BUILDING AS A PERCENTAGE OF | | | FLOOR AREA AS SPECIFIED IN 24.5.2.2.1 THROUGH | | | 24.5.2.2.3. | | | 24.5.2.2.1 CRITICAL AREAS. CRITICAL AREAS, SUCH AS THE | | | EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER(S), THE FIRE PUMP ROOM(S), | | | EXIT STAIRS, EXIT PASSAGEWAYS, ELEVATOR LOBBIES, | | | STANDPIPE CABINETS, SPRINKLER SECTIONAL VALVE | | | LOCATIONS, AND OTHER AREAS DEEMED CRITICAL BY THE | | | AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH | | | 99 PERCENT FLOOR AREA RADIO COVERAGE. | | | 24.5.2.2.2 GENERAL BUILDING AREAS. GENERAL BUILDING | | | AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH 90 PERCENT FLOOR AREA | | | RADIO COVERAGE. | | | 24.5.2.3 SIGNAL STRENGTH. | | | 24.5.2.3.1 INBOUND. A MINIMUM INBOUND SIGNAL STRENGTH | | | OF -95 DBM, OR OTHER SIGNAL STRENGTH AS REQUIRED BY THE | | | AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL BE PROVIDED | | | THROUGHOUT THE COVERAGE AREA. | | | 24.5.2.3.2 OUTBOUND. A MINIMUM OUTBOUND SIGNAL STRENGTH | | | OF -95 DBM AT THE DONOR SITE, OR OTHER SIGNAL STRENGTH | | | AS REQUIRED BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED FROM THE COVERAGE AREA. | | | | | | THE SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL | | | STRENGTH OF -95 DBM FOR THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST | | | PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE. TESTING SHALL BE BY AN | | | ACCEPTABLE NATIONAL STANDARD DOCUMENTING PERCENTAGES | | | NOTED ABOVE AND BY ACTUAL RADIO TESTING BY FIRE | | | PERSONNEL. IF THE MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A | | | BI-DIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH | | | A MINIMUM 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP. | | | | | | PLEASE CONTACT MARK FILLA, PALM BEACH COUNTY PUBLIC | | | SAFETY RADIO SYSTEMS MANAGER, [email protected], | | | 561-233-0837; AS OUR RADIOS OPERATE ON THEIR SYSTEM FOR | | | DETAILED RADIO FREQUENCY AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. | | | | | | | | | 14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS | | | BUILDING. | | | | | | ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS, | | | PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS. | | | | | | 15. THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA | | | 101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE PROTECTION | | | EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING: | | | | | | THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED, | | | INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204, | | | STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY | | | RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR | | | RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY | | | HAVING JURISDICTION. | | | | | | THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE | | | INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE | | | APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED | | | MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE | | | SYSTEM. | | | | | | ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL | | | INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.9. | | | | | | 16. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 17. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-23-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-23-2021 |
Time |
15:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-23-2021 |
Time |
15:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-09-23 15:39:50 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: LOFTIN PLACE PHASE II Z21010013 | | | SEPTEMBER 23, 2021 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ON A TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN: | | | ? SATISFIED. LIST OF ALL TREES AND PALMS AND INDICATE | | | IF THEY WILL REMAIN, BE REMOVED OR BE RELOCATED. | | | #20 UNKNOWN MUST BE IDENTIFIED. CARROTWOOD #18 SHOULD | | | BE LISTED AS PROHIBITED INVASIVE, AND NO MITIGATION | | | DUE. | | | ? SATISFIED. TREES AND PALMS CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE TO | | | BE MITIGATED BASED ON CATEGORY. ANY TREES 20 FEET OR | | | MORE CANOPY DIAMETER TO BE MITIGATED BY ACTUAL SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE. 1:1 MITIGATION IS EQUAL TO THE CATEGORY VALUE. | | | CANOPY DIAMETER MUST BE PROVIDED FOR ALL TREES FOR | | | REMOVAL TO DETERMINE THE MITIGATION DUE, AND ALL PALMS | | | MUST HAVE THE CATEGORY PROVIDED TO DETERMINE THE | | | MITIGATION DUE. ADD A COLUMN FOR CATEGORY. FICUS TREES | | | MUST BE MITIGATED. | | | PROVIDE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF MITIGATION DUE BY | | | CATEGORY FOR EACH OF THE 1:1 TREES AND PALMS. LIVE OAK | | | IS CATEGORY 1 WITH 300 SQ FT MITIGATION DUE, AND SABAL | | | PALMS ARE CATEGORY 3 AT 100 SQ FT EACH. | | | ? SATISFIED. INCLUDE EXISTING STREET TREES TO BE | | | REMOVED ON N DIXIE. | | | THE STREET TREES EXISTING ALONG N DIXIE ARE NOT IN | | | IDEAL CONDITION, AND DO NOT NEED TO BE RELOCATED. | | | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF | | | MITIGATION REQUIRED FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO | | | BE REMOVED. | | | TOTAL MITIGATION DUE FOR REMOVALS WAS NOT EASY TO | | | SEPARATE FROM THE REST OF THE INFORMATION IN THE CANOPY | | | COLUMN. CREATE A SEPARATE COLUMN FOR MITIGATION DUE AND | | | FILL IN THE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR EACH TREE REMOVED. THEN | | | PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF MITIGATION DUE AT | | | THE BOTTOM OF THE COLUMN. | | | | | | PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE OF ALL MITIGATION DUE. | | | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION VALUES BY CATEGORY | | | FOR THE PROPOSED TREES AND PALMS. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE | | | TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR | | | RELOCATED. DESCRIBE THE METHODOLOGY USED TO DETERMINE | | | CONDITION. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY | | | EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR | | | POOR. | | | CONDITION NEEDS TO BE INDICATED FOR EACH TREE OR PALM | | | PER THE SUITABILITY RATINGS ABOVE. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. CALCULATIONS FOR NUMBER OF REQUIRED | | | STREET TREES NEED TO BE PROVIDED. TOTAL LENGTH OF | | | STREETSCAPE FROM ONE PROPERTY LINE TO THE OTHER END, | | | DIVIDE BY 30, THEN INDICATE THE NUMBER OF TREES | | | REQUIRED AND PROVIDED, ROUNDING UP FOR ANY PORTION | | | LEFT. PROVIDE THE PROPERTY LINE LENGTH FOR THE BUFFER | | | REQUIREMENT ON THE EAST SIDE NOT ADJACENT TO A STREET | | | AND PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED AND PROVIDED. | | | CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE PROVIDED PER SECTION 94-113 FOR | | | THE STREETSCAPE TREES. | | | CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE PROVIDED FOR THE BUFFER SECTION | | | ALONG THE NORTH BUILDING EAST BUFFER. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES ON | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN, ALSO LOCATIONS OF VALVES AND BACKFLOW | | | PREVENTERS AND FPL TRANSFORMERS. SCREENING MUST BE | | | PROVIDED, AND CONFLICTS RESOLVED WITH STREET TREES. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MASTER PLANT LIST WITH TOTAL | | | QUANTITIES OF EACH SPECIES, SIZE, ETC. | | | ADD ANY RELOCATED PALMS TO THE PLANT LIST. | | | | | | REMOVE THE TREES AND PALMS FROM THE PLANT LIST THAT ARE | | | BEING REMOVED. THIS SHOULD BE SHOWN ONLY ON SHEET | | | L1-1-00. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT AND NATIVE SPECIES ADDED BASED ON THE PROPOSED | | | PLANT LIST PER SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A | | | MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE | | | FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED | | | FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST | | | RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT | | | DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | | | | | | | 7. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. OPEN SPACE AREA SHEET | | | NEEDS TO IDENTIFY THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE TYPE AND | | | PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE REQUIREMENTS AS FOUND | | | IN SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-7 FOR VEGETATED AREA AND | | | TREE CANOPY PER TABLE IV-8. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOULD | | | ALSO INCLUDE THE SAME INFORMATION. | | | TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THE REQUIRED PUBLIC AND | | | PRIVATE OPEN SPACE FOLLOWS SECTION 94-109 TABLE VIII-4. | | | PROVIDE THE LIST OF TREES THAT ARE CLAIMED FOR CREDIT. | | | | | | THREE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE PLAZAS MUST BE SEPARATELY SHOWN | | | IN THE DATA CHART WITH THE INDIVIDUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE | | | AND THE VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY FOR AREAS 1, 2, | | | AND 3. | | | DIVIDE UP THE GARDEN PLAZAS LIKE THE PRIVATE OPEN | | | SPACE. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | | | | 4. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE LANDSCAPE PERMIT, THE | | | PUBLIC OPEN SPACE INDICATED AS GARDEN PLAZA WILL HAVE | | | THE VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY INCREASED TO MEET | | | THE 50% REQUIREMENT FOR EACH. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-20-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
05-20-2021 |
Time |
16:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
05-20-2021 |
Time |
16:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-05-20 16:51:50 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: LOFTIN PLACE PHASE II Z21010013 | | | MAY 20, 2021 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ON A TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN: | | | ? SATISFIED. LIST OF ALL TREES AND PALMS AND INDICATE | | | IF THEY WILL REMAIN, BE REMOVED OR BE RELOCATED. | | | #20 UNKNOWN MUST BE IDENTIFIED. CARROTWOOD #18 SHOULD | | | BE LISTED AS PROHIBITED INVASIVE, AND NO MITIGATION | | | DUE. | | | ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. TREES AND PALMS CANOPY SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE TO BE MITIGATED BASED ON CATEGORY. ANY TREES 20 | | | FEET OR MORE CANOPY DIAMETER TO BE MITIGATED BY ACTUAL | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE. 1:1 MITIGATION IS EQUAL TO THE CATEGORY | | | VALUE. | | | CANOPY DIAMETER MUST BE PROVIDED FOR ALL TREES FOR | | | REMOVAL TO DETERMINE THE MITIGATION DUE, AND ALL PALMS | | | MUST HAVE THE CATEGORY PROVIDED TO DETERMINE THE | | | MITIGATION DUE. ADD A COLUMN FOR CATEGORY. FICUS TREES | | | MUST BE MITIGATED. | | | PROVIDE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF MITIGATION DUE BY | | | CATEGORY FOR EACH OF THE 1:1 TREES AND PALMS. LIVE OAK | | | IS CATEGORY 1 WITH 300 SQ FT MITIGATION DUE, AND SABAL | | | PALMS ARE CATEGORY 3 AT 100 SQ FT EACH. | | | ? SATISFIED. INCLUDE EXISTING STREET TREES TO BE | | | REMOVED ON N DIXIE. | | | THE STREET TREES EXISTING ALONG N DIXIE ARE NOT IN | | | IDEAL CONDITION, AND DO NOT NEED TO BE RELOCATED. | | | ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE | | | OF MITIGATION REQUIRED FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED | | | TO BE REMOVED. | | | TOTAL MITIGATION DUE FOR REMOVALS WAS NOT EASY TO | | | SEPARATE FROM THE REST OF THE INFORMATION IN THE CANOPY | | | COLUMN. CREATE A SEPARATE COLUMN FOR MITIGATION DUE AND | | | FILL IN THE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR EACH TREE REMOVED. THEN | | | PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF MITIGATION DUE AT | | | THE BOTTOM OF THE COLUMN. | | | | | | PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE OF ALL MITIGATION DUE. | | | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION VALUES BY CATEGORY | | | FOR THE PROPOSED TREES AND PALMS. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE | | | TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR | | | RELOCATED. DESCRIBE THE METHODOLOGY USED TO DETERMINE | | | CONDITION. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY | | | EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR | | | POOR. | | | CONDITION NEEDS TO BE INDICATED FOR EACH TREE OR PALM | | | PER THE SUITABILITY RATINGS ABOVE. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. CALCULATIONS FOR NUMBER OF REQUIRED | | | STREET TREES NEED TO BE PROVIDED. TOTAL LENGTH OF | | | STREETSCAPE FROM ONE PROPERTY LINE TO THE OTHER END, | | | DIVIDE BY 30, THEN INDICATE THE NUMBER OF TREES | | | REQUIRED AND PROVIDED, ROUNDING UP FOR ANY PORTION | | | LEFT. PROVIDE THE PROPERTY LINE LENGTH FOR THE BUFFER | | | REQUIREMENT ON THE EAST SIDE NOT ADJACENT TO A STREET | | | AND PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED AND PROVIDED. | | | CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE PROVIDED PER SECTION 94-113 FOR | | | THE STREETSCAPE TREES. | | | CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE PROVIDED FOR THE BUFFER SECTION | | | ALONG THE NORTH BUILDING EAST BUFFER. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES ON | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN, ALSO LOCATIONS OF VALVES AND BACKFLOW | | | PREVENTERS AND FPL TRANSFORMERS. SCREENING MUST BE | | | PROVIDED, AND CONFLICTS RESOLVED WITH STREET TREES. | | | | | | 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MASTER PLANT LIST | | | WITH TOTAL QUANTITIES OF EACH SPECIES, SIZE, ETC. | | | ADD ANY RELOCATED PALMS TO THE PLANT LIST. | | | | | | REMOVE THE TREES AND PALMS FROM THE PLANT LIST THAT ARE | | | BEING REMOVED. THIS SHOULD BE SHOWN ONLY ON SHEET | | | L1-1-00. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT AND NATIVE SPECIES ADDED BASED ON THE PROPOSED | | | PLANT LIST PER SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A | | | MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE | | | FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED | | | FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST | | | RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT | | | DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | | | | | | | 7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. OPEN SPACE AREA SHEET NEEDS TO | | | IDENTIFY THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE TYPE AND PROVIDE THE | | | CALCULATIONS FOR THE REQUIREMENTS AS FOUND IN SECTION | | | 94-109 TABLE IV-7 FOR VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY | | | PER TABLE IV-8. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOULD ALSO INCLUDE | | | THE SAME INFORMATION. | | | TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THE REQUIRED PUBLIC AND | | | PRIVATE OPEN SPACE FOLLOWS SECTION 94-109 TABLE VIII-4. | | | PROVIDE THE LIST OF TREES THAT ARE CLAIMED FOR CREDIT. | | | | | | THREE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE PLAZAS MUST BE SEPARATELY SHOWN | | | IN THE DATA CHART WITH THE INDIVIDUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE | | | AND THE VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY FOR AREAS 1, 2, | | | AND 3. | | | DIVIDE UP THE GARDEN PLAZAS LIKE THE PRIVATE OPEN | | | SPACE. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-05-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
04-05-2021 |
Time |
14:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
04-05-2021 |
Time |
12:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-04-05 14:39:27 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: LOFTIN PLACE PHASE II Z21010013 | | | APRIL 5, 2021 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ON A TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN: | | | ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. LIST OF ALL TREES AND PALMS AND | | | INDICATE IF THEY WILL REMAIN, BE REMOVED OR BE | | | RELOCATED. | | | #20 UNKNOWN MUST BE IDENTIFIED. CARROTWOOD #18 SHOULD | | | BE LISTED AS PROHIBITED INVASIVE, AND NO MITIGATION | | | DUE. | | | ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. TREES AND PALMS CANOPY SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE TO BE MITIGATED BASED ON CATEGORY. ANY TREES 20 | | | FEET OR MORE CANOPY DIAMETER TO BE MITIGATED BY ACTUAL | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE. 1:1 MITIGATION IS EQUAL TO THE CATEGORY | | | VALUE. | | | CANOPY DIAMETER MUST BE PROVIDED FOR ALL TREES FOR | | | REMOVAL TO DETERMINE THE MITIGATION DUE, AND ALL PALMS | | | MUST HAVE THE CATEGORY PROVIDED TO DETERMINE THE | | | MITIGATION DUE. ADD A COLUMN FOR CATEGORY. FICUS TREES | | | MUST BE MITIGATED. | | | ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. INCLUDE EXISTING STREET TREES TO | | | BE REMOVED ON N DIXIE. | | | THE STREET TREES EXISTING ALONG N DIXIE ARE NOT IN | | | IDEAL CONDITION, AND DO NOT NEED TO BE RELOCATED. | | | ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE | | | OF MITIGATION REQUIRED FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED | | | TO BE REMOVED. | | | TOTAL MITIGATION DUE FOR REMOVALS WAS NOT EASY TO | | | SEPARATE FROM THE REST OF THE INFORMATION IN THE CANOPY | | | COLUMN. CREATE A SEPARATE COLUMN FOR MITIGATION DUE AND | | | FILL IN THE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR EACH TREE REMOVED. THEN | | | PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF MITIGATION DUE AT | | | THE BOTTOM OF THE COLUMN. | | | ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION VALUES BY | | | CATEGORY FOR THE PROPOSED TREES AND PALMS. | | | | | | 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES | | | NATIVE TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE | | | OR RELOCATED. DESCRIBE THE METHODOLOGY USED TO | | | DETERMINE CONDITION. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS | | | SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, | | | MODERATE, OR POOR. | | | CONDITION NEEDS TO BE INDICATED FOR EACH TREE OR PALM | | | PER THE SUITABILITY RATINGS ABOVE. | | | | | | 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. CALCULATIONS FOR NUMBER OF | | | REQUIRED STREET TREES NEED TO BE PROVIDED. TOTAL LENGTH | | | OF STREETSCAPE FROM ONE PROPERTY LINE TO THE OTHER END, | | | DIVIDE BY 30, THEN INDICATE THE NUMBER OF TREES | | | REQUIRED AND PROVIDED, ROUNDING UP FOR ANY PORTION | | | LEFT. PROVIDE THE PROPERTY LINE LENGTH FOR THE BUFFER | | | REQUIREMENT ON THE EAST SIDE NOT ADJACENT TO A STREET | | | AND PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED AND PROVIDED. | | | CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE PROVIDED PER SECTION 94-113 FOR | | | THE STREETSCAPE TREES. | | | CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE PROVIDED FOR THE BUFFER SECTION | | | ALONG THE NORTH BUILDING EAST BUFFER. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES ON | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN, ALSO LOCATIONS OF VALVES AND BACKFLOW | | | PREVENTERS AND FPL TRANSFORMERS. SCREENING MUST BE | | | PROVIDED, AND CONFLICTS RESOLVED WITH STREET TREES. | | | | | | 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MASTER PLANT LIST | | | WITH TOTAL QUANTITIES OF EACH SPECIES, SIZE, ETC. | | | ADD ANY RELOCATED PALMS TO THE PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT AND NATIVE SPECIES ADDED BASED ON THE PROPOSED | | | PLANT LIST PER SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A | | | MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE | | | FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED | | | FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST | | | RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT | | | DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | | | | | | | 7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. OPEN SPACE AREA SHEET NEEDS TO | | | IDENTIFY THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE TYPE AND PROVIDE THE | | | CALCULATIONS FOR THE REQUIREMENTS AS FOUND IN SECTION | | | 94-109 TABLE IV-7 FOR VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY | | | PER TABLE IV-8. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOULD ALSO INCLUDE | | | THE SAME INFORMATION. | | | TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THE REQUIRED PUBLIC AND | | | PRIVATE OPEN SPACE FOLLOWS SECTION 94-109 TABLE VIII-4. | | | PROVIDE THE LIST OF TREES THAT ARE CLAIMED FOR CREDIT. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-08-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
02-08-2021 |
Time |
14:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
02-08-2021 |
Time |
14:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-02-08 14:56:50 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: LOFTIN PLACE PHASE II Z21010013 | | | FEBRUARY 8, 2021 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ON A TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN: | | | ? LIST OF ALL TREES AND PALMS AND INDICATE IF THEY WILL | | | REMAIN, BE REMOVED OR BE RELOCATED. | | | ? TREES AND PALMS CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE TO BE MITIGATED | | | BASED ON CATEGORY. ANY TREES 20 FEET OR MORE CANOPY | | | DIAMETER TO BE MITIGATED BY ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE. 1:1 | | | MITIGATION IS EQUAL TO THE CATEGORY VALUE. | | | ? INCLUDE EXISTING STREET TREES TO BE REMOVED ON N | | | DIXIE. | | | ? PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF MITIGATION | | | REQUIRED FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE | | | REMOVED. | | | ? PROVIDE THE MITIGATION VALUES BY CATEGORY FOR THE | | | PROPOSED TREES AND PALMS. | | | | | | 2. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES IN GOOD | | | CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. | | | DESCRIBE THE METHODOLOGY USED TO DETERMINE CONDITION. | | | ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF | | | SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR POOR. | | | | | | 3. CALCULATIONS FOR NUMBER OF REQUIRED STREET TREES | | | NEED TO BE PROVIDED. TOTAL LENGTH OF STREETSCAPE FROM | | | ONE PROPERTY LINE TO THE OTHER END, DIVIDE BY 30, THEN | | | INDICATE THE NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED AND PROVIDED, | | | ROUNDING UP FOR ANY PORTION LEFT. PROVIDE THE PROPERTY | | | LINE LENGTH FOR THE BUFFER REQUIREMENT ON THE EAST SIDE | | | NOT ADJACENT TO A STREET AND PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF | | | TREES REQUIRED AND PROVIDED. | | | | | | 4. SHOW LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, | | | ALSO LOCATIONS OF VALVES AND BACKFLOW PREVENTERS AND | | | FPL TRANSFORMERS. SCREENING MUST BE PROVIDED, AND | | | CONFLICTS RESOLVED WITH STREET TREES. | | | | | | 5. PROVIDE A MASTER PLANT LIST WITH TOTAL QUANTITIES OF | | | EACH SPECIES, SIZE, ETC. | | | | | | 6. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF DROUGHT TOLERANT | | | AND NATIVE SPECIES ADDED BASED ON THE PROPOSED PLANT | | | LIST PER SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF | | | 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA | | | NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE | | | CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT | | | EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT | | | WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | | | | | | | 7. OPEN SPACE AREA SHEET NEEDS TO IDENTIFY THE PRIVATE | | | OPEN SPACE TYPE AND PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE | | | REQUIREMENTS AS FOUND IN SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-7 FOR | | | VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY PER TABLE IV-8. THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOULD ALSO INCLUDE THE SAME | | | INFORMATION. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-19-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
03-19-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
03-19-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-19 08:42:42 | CONDITION OF APPROVAL: THE ROLL-OUT CONTAINER SHOULD BE | | | A FRONT LOAD TYPE IN ORDER BE SERVICED BY THE CITY`S | | | SANITATION COLLECTION TRUCKS. | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 822-2045 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-08-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
02-08-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
02-08-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-02-08 09:33:43 | PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS: | | | 1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID | | | WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE AND TYPE OF | | | THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR) THAT WILL BE | | | UTILIZED THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION | | | SERVICE. | | | | | | 2- AUTO TURN (DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE TIRES PATH) FOR | | | THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER TRUCK WITH THE | | | FOLLOWING SPECS: | | | - TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT | | | - TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT | | | - TURNING RADIUS: | | | - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT | | | - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT | | | - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT | | | | | | 3 CONTINGENCY PLAN, FOR WHEN THE COMPACTOR IS OUT OF | | | SERVICE (I.E. CITY DUMPSTER, ROLL-OFF CONTAINER) | | | 4- DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP AND | | | RECYCLING CONTAINERS | | | | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-11-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
02-11-2021 |
Time |
11:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
02-11-2021 |
Time |
11:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-02-11 11:23:06 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. COMMENTS WITHHELD PENDING SUBMITTAL OF ENGINEERING | | | PLANS SHOWING CURRENT SITE PLAN. | | | | | | 2. INCLUDE CONCEPTUAL DEMOLITION PLAN WITH THE NEXT | | | SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 3. SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | | | | 4. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM CENTERLINE OF STREET TO | | | BUILDING FACE FOR ALL SIDES OF THE BUILDINGS, | | | PREFERABLY AT LOCATIONS WHERE ON-STREET PARKING IS | | | BEING ADDED. LABEL RIGHT OF WAY LINES. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | | | | 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED | | | WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE COPY OF MODIFIED SFWMD ERP PERMIT BEFORE | | | START OF CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 4. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WITH THE | | | ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 (O) | | | 561-351-0510 (M) | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-02-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
04-02-2021 |
Time |
09:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-04-02 09:03:30 | 1. PROVIDE COPIES OF UE'S AND SS EASEMENT. | | | 2. CCTV SANITARY NORTH OF EUCALYPTUS TO DETERMINE | | | EXTENTS AND CONDITION. | | | 3. NEED DETAILS/CROSS-SECTION OF BRIDGE AT GROUND | | | LEVEL. | | | 4. NEED FDOT APPROVAL OF ACCEPTANCE OF SIDEWALK | | | EASEMENTS ALONG DIXIE. | | | | | | PRIOR TO CO: | | | | | | MMOA WITH FDOT | | | DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT | | | SIDEWALK EASEMENTS WITH FDOT | | | AERIAL ENCROACHMENT EASEMENT FOR BRIDGE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-05-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
02-05-2021 |
Time |
12:36 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-02-05 12:57:29 | 1. MULTIPLE ENGINEERING PLANS RECEIVED, INCLUDING | | | ORIGINAL PHASE 1/AS-BUILTS. PLEASE REVISE TO SHOW ONLY | | | EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROPOSED CONNECTIONS. | | | 2. DIXIE HWY. IMPROVEMENTS/PARKING WILL REQUIRE FDOT | | | APPROVAL. | | | 3. IT APPEARS THAT PARCEL 2 BUILDING, POOL AND TREES | | | ENCROACH INTO EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEMENT. SHOW ALL | | | EXISTING EASEMENTS ON ALL PLANS. | | | 4. CIVIL PLANS DO NOT MATCH SITE PLAN. | | | 5. EXISTING UTILITIES IN ABANDONED ALLEY WILL NEED TO | | | BE RELOCATED OR REMOVED. UTILITY EASEMENT(S) WILL NEED | | | TO BE TERMINATED. | | | 6. AERIAL CROSSING WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE APPROVAL. | | | 7. MMOA FOR DIXIE HWY. AND DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT WILL | | | BE REQUIRED. | | | 8. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE FORTHCOMING UPON RECEIPT | | | OF REVISED PLANS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-15-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
09-15-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-09-15 12:33:15 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS | | | 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COMPLETE TRAFFIC STUDY WITH | | | NARRATIVE ACCORDING TO COUNTY?S ARTICLE 12 AND USE | | | TRAFFIC VOLUMES GENERATED BY THE FULL PHASE II PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT. NOTE: EXCEPTION FROM COUNTY?S CONCURRENCY | | | DOES NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY TO REQUEST AN IN-DEPTH | | | TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. | | | 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER ONCE RECEIVED | | | | | | SITE COMMENTS | | | 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE 10 FEET WIDE SIDEWALK ALONG DIXIE | | | AND CORRESPONDING EASEMENT IF NECESSARY | | | 4) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE DETAILED SITE PLAN | | | SHOWCASING TRANSPORTATION FEATURES WITH DIMENSIONS SUCH | | | AS: ROAD AND SIDEWALK WIDTHS, PARKING STALL LENGTHS, | | | PAVEMENT MARKINGS, SIGNAGE, PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS, ADA | | | RAMPS. PROVIDE EXACT FILE NAME AND SHEET NUMBER. | | | 5) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC | | | CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE | | | OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT. | | | 6) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE | | | TRUCK AND SERVICE VEHICLES. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED | | | IN A SEPARATE FILE AND VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES SHALL | | | BE DEPICTED IN A DIFFERENT COLOR AND/OR LINE WEIGHT | | | THAN SURROUNDING FEATURES. | | | 7) NOT SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY AND | | | PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA | | | (MINIMUM 8 X 20 FEET). PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION | | | READINESS, SPECIFICALLY: A CONDUIT (2? SCHEDULE 40 PVC) | | | TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V | | | CIRCUIT). | | | 8) NOT SATISFIED. BOTH ENTRY GATES NEED TO BE PUSHED | | | BACK. PER CITY CODE 94-111(P): NOT LESS THAN 20 LINEAR | | | FEET SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR CAR QUEING, SHALL OCCUR | | | INTERNAL TO THE LOT, AND SHALL NOT INTERFERE WITH | | | PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION ON A PUBLIC SIDEWALK. | | | 9) NOT SATISFIED. THE NORTHERN GATE ON 8TH ST DOES NOT | | | SEEM CONDUCIVE TO PROPER VEHICULAR MANEUVERING. PROVIDE | | | AUTOTURN ANALYSIS SHOWCASING A VEHICLE COMING FROM THE | | | SECOND FLOOR AND TURNING RIGHT TO EXIT THE GARAGE. | | | | | | NOTE: POTENTIAL OPTIONS/SOLUTIONS FOR (8) AND (9) WOULD | | | BE INSTALLING A SINGLE GATE ON THE SLOPE UP AND EITHER | | | CLOSING THE DRIVEWAY ON 8TH ST OR MAKING IT ONE-WAY | | | ENTRY ONLY. PLEASE CONTACT STAFF FOR DISCUSSION, AS | | | THIS COULD BE A CONDITION OF APPROVAL TO BE ADDRESSED | | | DURING BUILDING PERMIT. | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-05-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
05-05-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
04-26-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-05-05 17:45:16 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS | | | 1) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE COMPLETE TRAFFIC STUDY | | | WITH NARRATIVE ACCORDING TO COUNTY?S ARTICLE 12 AND USE | | | TRAFFIC VOLUMES GENERATED BY THE FULL PHASE II PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT. NOTE: EXCEPTION FROM COUNTY?S CONCURRENCY | | | DOES NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY TO REQUEST AN IN-DEPTH | | | TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. | | | 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | | | | SITE COMMENTS | | | 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE 10 FEET WIDE SIDEWALK ALONG DIXIE | | | AND CORRESPONDING EASEMENT IF NECESSARY | | | 4) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE DETAILED SITE PLAN SHOWCASING | | | TRANSPORTATION FEATURES WITH DIMENSIONS SUCH AS: ROAD | | | AND SIDEWALK WIDTHS, PARKING STALL LENGTHS, PAVEMENT | | | MARKINGS, SIGNAGE, PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS, ADA RAMPS, | | | ETC. | | | 5) NOT SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, SHOWCASE BASIC CURB | | | DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE | | | OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT | | | 6) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE | | | TRUCK AND SERVICE VEHICLES. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED | | | IN A SEPARATE FILE AND VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES SHALL | | | BE DEPICTED IN A DIFFERENT COLOR AND/OR LINE WEIGHT | | | THAN SURROUNDING FEATURES. | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-02-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
04-02-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-04-02 17:48:32 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS | | | 1) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE TRAFFIC STUDY | | | 1A. PROVIDE COMPLETE TRAFFIC STUDY ACCORDING TO COUNTY | | | ARTICLE 12 AND USE TRAFFIC VOLUMES GENERATED BY THE | | | FULL PHASE II PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. NOTE: EXCEPTION | | | FROM COUNTY?S CONCURRENCY DOES NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY TO | | | REQUEST AN IN-DEPTH TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. | | | 2) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER ONCE | | | RECEIVED | | | | | | SITE COMMENTS | | | 3) PROVIDE 10 FEET WIDE SIDEWALK ALONG DIXIE AND | | | CORRESPONDING EASEMENT IF NECESSARY | | | 4) PROVIDE DETAILED SITE PLAN SHOWCASING TRANSPORTATION | | | FEATURES WITH DIMENSIONS SUCH AS: ROAD AND SIDEWALK | | | WIDTHS, PARKING STALL LENGTHS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, | | | SIGNAGE, PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS, ADA RAMPS, ETC. | | | 5) ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE CURB CUTS ON THE | | | OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT | | | 6) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND | | | SERVICE VEHICLES. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A | | | SEPARATE FILE AND VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES SHALL BE | | | DEPICTED IN A DIFFERENT COLOR AND/OR LINE WEIGHT THAN | | | SURROUNDING FEATURES. | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-10-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
02-10-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-02-10 20:23:52 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS | | | 1) PROVIDE TRAFFIC STUDY | | | 2) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | | | | SITE COMMENTS | | | 3) MULTIPLE PLANS SUBMITTED. PLEASE PROVIDE PROPER ONES | | | SHOWCASING ONLY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT. | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-24-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
09-24-2021 |
Time |
11:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
09-10-2021 |
Time |
09:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-09-24 09:42:04 | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: | | | 1. LIGHT FIXTURES AND POLES ON ROW SHALL MATCH CITY | | | STANDARD. | | | 2. POS AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE ALONG THE STREET FRONTAGE | | | NEEDS TO MEET THE VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY | | | REQUIREMENTS. | | | 3. ROOF TOP TERRACE IN SHEET L1-6-02 SHALL BE ADJUSTED | | | TO MATCH AREA INDICATED IN SHEET A-1.2. | | | 4. GARBAGE HOLDING AREA FOR NORTH BUILDING SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED WITHOUT BLOCKING THE ROW. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-23-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
09-23-2021 |
Time |
09:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
04-23-2021 |
Time |
10:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-09-23 09:59:38 | DAC REVIEW IN PROCESS |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-01-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
elevesqu |
Date |
04-01-2021 |
Time |
09:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
elevesqu |
Date |
04-01-2021 |
Time |
09:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-04-01 09:06:58 | SEE NEW COMMENTS UNDER OLD COMMENTS THAT ARE MARKED AS | | | SATISFIED/NOT SATISFIED/ PARTIALLY SATIFISFIED. IF | | | MARKED AS "CONDITION OF APPROVAL", THESE ITEMS WILL BE | | | LISTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR SITE PLAN AND CAN | | | BE HANDLED THROUGH BUIDLING PERMIT REVIEW. | | | | | | GENERAL COMMENTS/ARCHITECTURAL: | | | 1. SATISFIED. | | | 2. SATISFIED, SEE PROVISOS FOR BUILDING PERMIT. BY | | | ZONING REGULATIONS FOR LD-4-12, A 5? SETBACK IS | | | REQUIRED ALONG THE SIDE INTERIOR/REAR SETBACK (EASTERN | | | PROPERTY LINE) FOR SOUTH BUILDING (LD-4-12 TABLE | | | IV-52). HOWEVER, EXISTING LOFTIN PHASE I PARKING GARAGE | | | IS BUILT RIGHT UP TO INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK. PER THE | | | DECLARATION OF RESTRICTION IN ORB 28411 PG. 1108, AN | | | ADDITIONAL SETBACK MAY BE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED | | | BUILDING FROM THE EDGE GARAGE. THE REQUIRED SETBACK | | | DEPENDS ON THE PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS ON THE PROPOSED | | | STRUCTURE?S EAST FA?ADE | | | 3. SATISFIED. | | | 4. SATISFIED. | | | 5. NOT SATISFIED. THERE WAS A BUS SHELTER ON THE SOUTH | | | PORTION OF PHASE II THAT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN REMOVED | | | UNTIL PHASE II WAS CONSTRUCTED, WHEN A REPLACEMENT | | | SHELTER WAS TO BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE NORTH BUILDING | | | STREET. THE SHELTER WAS REMOVED AT SOME POINT, AND | | | NEVER REPLACED. A BUS SHELTER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS | | | PART OF THIS PHASE II PROCESS. PLEASE CONSTRUCT IN | | | ARCHITECTURALLY COMPATIBLE DESIGN. PALM TRAN PREFERS | | | THE SHELTER REMAIN ON THE BLOCK BETWEEN EUCALYPTUS AND | | | 8TH, WITHIN PROXIMITY TO THE EXISTING BUS STOP POLE. | | | 6. SATISFIED. | | | 7. SATISFIED. | | | 8. SATISFIED. | | | 9. SATISFIED. | | | 10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE FOLLOWING | | | EXHIBITS: | | | A. ACTIVE USE | | | B. FOOTPRINT | | | C. TRANSPARENCY | | | D. PLANAR BREAK | | | E. HORIZONTAL ELEMENTS | | | F. FAR | | | THE TRASH ROOMS DO NOT COUNT TOWARDS FAR (SHEET A-1.1). | | | TRANSPARENCY IS BASED ON LINEAR FEET, NOT SF. PLEASE | | | UPDATE IN TABLE ON SHEET A-1.8. | | | THE STAIRWAY ON 8TH STREET AND THE TRASH ROOM ON | | | EUCALYPTUS STREET WOULD NOT COUNT AS ACTIVE USE. | | | PLEASE UPDATE THE PERCENTAGE OF HORIZONTAL PROJECTION | | | ON EUCALYPTUS STREET ON SHEET A-1.9. | | | 11. SATISFIED. | | | 12. SATISFIED. | | | 13. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE FOLLOWING DATA | | | IN SITE DATA TABLE: | | | A. BUILDING FOOTPRINT PERCENTAGE ? SEE TABLES IV-51 AND | | | IV-52 AT END OF SECTION 94-134 | | | SEE NEW COMMENT #56 | | | 14. SATISFIED. | | | 15. SATISFIED. | | | 16. PARTIALLY SATISIFIED. THE 4 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES | | | (1 PER 100? OF FRONTAGE) APPEARS TO BE TOO FEW. THE | | | REQUIREMENT IS PER ALL STREET FRONTAGES (NORTH DIXIE | | | HIGHWAY, EUCALYPTUS STREET, 8TH STREET). THESE BIKE | | | PARKING SPACES NEED TO BE ON THE ROW OR ACCESSIBLE BY | | | THE GENERAL PUBLIC (SEE BICYCLE PARKING GUIDELINES | | | PREVIOUSLY SENT BY EMAIL). PLEASE PROVIDE BICYCLE RACK | | | SPECS | | | REPEAT COMMENT: PLEASE PROVIDE BICYCLE RACK SPECS. | | | PLEASE SHOW THE BICYCLE RACKS WITHIN THE ROW ON THE | | | SITE PLAN | | | 17. SATISFIED. | | | 18. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE GUEST PARKING | | | AT RATE OF 1/20 REQUIRED MINIMUM PARKING SPACES (FOR | | | ALL UNITS INCLUDING MICRO) AND INCLUDE IN PARKING DATA | | | TABLE | | | GUEST PARKING BASED ON REQUIRED MINIMUM PARKING NOT | | | PROVIDED. | | | 19. SATISFIED. | | | 20. SATISFIED. | | | 21. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. REQUIRED BIKE PARKING FOR | | | MICROUNITS (FOR LESS THAN 13 MICROUNITS) IS ONE BIKE | | | PARKING SPACE PER UNIT. PLEASE INCLUDE IN BIKE PARKING | | | TABLE ? ONLY APPLIES TO THE 8 MICROUNITS, THE OTHERS | | | FALL UNDER THE 1/15 PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENT. ALL | | | BICYCLE PARKING FOR RESIDENTIAL USE SHOULD BE IN A | | | SECURE AND COVERED LOCATION (INSIDE PARKING GARAGE IS | | | FINE, BUT PLEASE ILLUSTRATE HOW BEING SECURED) | | | PER CITY BICYCLE RACK SPECS, 24?? IS REQUIRED BETWEEN A | | | WALL AND A BIKE RACKS, 30? IS REQUIRED BETWEEN EACH | | | BICYCLE RACK, WITH A CENTER AISLE OF 36?. THE PROPOSED | | | BICYCLE RACK ROOM WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO FIT THE NUMBER | | | OF RACKS THAT IS REQUIRED | | | 22. CONDITION OF APPROVAL: PLEASE NOTE, TRANSIT FEE | | | (TROLLEY) CONTRIBUTION FEE PER SECTION 94-106(A)(8A)- | | | CONTRIBUTION IS $10 PER MICROUNIT PER MONTH | | | 23. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LOS FOR TRASH | | | COLLECTION TO DETERMINE REQUIRED COMPACTORS/DUMPSTERS | | | WITHIN PROPOSED TRASH ROOM. HOW IS TRASH COLLECTION | | | WORKING FOR SOUTH BUILDING? PLEASE SPEAK TO MATT HEJAZI | | | REGARDING LOS AND NEEDED COMPACTORS/DUMPSTERS AND | | | LOCATION FOR DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR STAGING ON PICK UP DAY | | | IS THE TEMPORARY LOADING/UNLOADING FOR THE TRASH | | | PICKUP? PLEASE CLARIFY. PLEASE REMOVE THE CURB CUT FOR | | | THE TRASH ROOMS AND INCLUDE A DROP CURB INSTEAD. | | | 24. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE EAST ELEVATION OF THE | | | SOUTHERN BUILDING (SECTION 7 ON PAGE A-3.7) DOES NOT | | | SEEM TO MATCH THE FLOOR PLANS. THERE ARE SOME GROUND | | | FLOOR ELEVATIONS THAT HAVE THE APPEARANCE OF COMMERCIAL | | | WINDOWS BUT ARE RESIDENTIAL UNITS. PLEASE UPDATE | | | ELEVATIONS TO REFLECT SITE PLAN | | | SOME OF THE GROUND FLOOR UNITS HAVE HIGH WINDOWS THAT | | | EXTEND TO THE GROUND, PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THESE | | | ELEVATIONS MATCH THE PROPOSED WINDOW TYPES ALONG 8TH | | | STREET (TWO MIDDLE WINDOWS AND WESTERN WINDOW ON NORTH | | | BUILDING), THE THREE NORTHERN GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS | | | ALONG NORTH DIXIE HIGHWAY (NORTH BUILDING), THE GROUND | | | FLOOR UNITS ON EUCALYPTUS STREET IN THE SOUTHERN | | | BUILDING, AND THE EASTERN THREE HIGH WINDOWS ON THE | | | SOUTH ELEVATION OF THE SOUTH BUILDING. STAFF JUST WANTS | | | TO CONFIRM THAT THE WINDOWS ARE MATCHING WHAT IS SHOWN | | | ON THE FLOOR PLAN FOR THESE UNITS. | | | 25. SATISFIED. | | | 26. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ON FACADES ENCLOSING | | | NON-ACTIVE USE (PARKING GARAGE), ARCHITECTURAL | | | TREATMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED NOT TO INCLUDE PAINT AND | | | FAUX TREATMENTS, MATERIAL APPLICATIONS LESS THAN 4 | | | INCHES IN HEIGHT, DEPTH OR WIDTH, OR BUILDING SIGNS. | | | ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SHALL BE INTEGRATED WITH DESIGN OF | | | ADJACENT ACTIVE USE FACADES. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL | | | ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT ON PARKING GARAGE. SEE | | | DEFINITION IN SECTION 94-109. EVALUATE MEANS OF | | | REDUCING IMPACT OF RAMP FACING EUCALYPTUS STREET | | | PLEASE EXAMINE INCLUDING THE WINDOW DESIGN TO MATCH THE | | | WINDOW DESIGN ON THE RESIDENTIAL FA?ADE. PLEASE EXAMINE | | | ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT AT THE PARKING | | | GARAGE ENTRANCES | | | 27. SATISFIED. | | | 28. SATISFIED. | | | 29. SATISFIED. | | | 30. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE: | | | A. SATISFIED | | | B. SATISFIED | | | C. NOT SATISFIED. GROUND FLOOR COLORED, CONTEXTUAL | | | RENDERINGS WITH PLANTING HEIGHT LANDSCAPE | | | D. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. MATERIAL SAMPLE IMAGERY AND | | | MATERIAL SPECIFICATION DETAIL ? PLEASE PROVIDE SOME | | | IMAGERY OF ACTUAL MATERIALS | | | E. SATISFIED | | | ENGINEERING | | | 31. SATISFIED | | | 32. SATISFIED | | | 33. SATISFIED. | | | 34. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE UPDATED CROSS | | | SECTIONS INCLUDING: | | | A. SIDEWALK SECTIONS ADJACENT TO PARALLEL PARKING | | | SPACES | | | B. SIDEWALK SECTIONS ADJACENT TO RETAIL/COMMERCIAL DOOR | | | ENTRANCES | | | C. SIDEWALK SECTIONS ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL UNITS | | | THE PROPOSED SLOPE OF PORTIONS OF THE SIDEWALK IN CROSS | | | SECTION A-A AND B-B ARE TOO HIGH. MAXIMUM OF 2% SLOPE | | | SHALL BE MAINTAINED ALONG SIDEWALKS AND FROM PARALLEL | | | PARKING TO THE SIDEWALK. REQUIRED SLOPE CHANGES SHALL | | | BE CAPTURED INTERNAL TO BUILDING. | | | 35. NOT SATISFIED. ALL LARGE GRADING CHANGES SHALL BE | | | CAPTURED WITHIN BUILDING NOT WITHIN SIDEWALK OR ROW | | | 36. NOT SATISFIED | | | 37. SATISFIED | | | 38. SATISFIED | | | 39. CONDITION OF APPROVAL: THE DECLARATION OF EASEMENTS | | | (ORB 28271 PAGE 144) MAY HAVE TO BE UPDATED AND AMENDED | | | AS NECESSARY SUBJECT TO CITY ENGINEERING AND CITY LEGAL | | | REVIEW | | | 40. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE PHOTOMETRIC | | | PLAN FOR ALL ROW INCLUDING PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, GARAGE | | | ENTRANCES AND EXITS, ALL SIDEWALKS, ANY SIDEWALKS | | | LEADING INTO BUILDING OR GARAGE AND INCLUDE LIGHT POLE | | | SPECS | | | PLEASE INCLUDE PHOTOMETRIC ANALYSIS FOR PUBLIC OPEN | | | SPACE. PLEASE INCLUDE STREET TREES ON PHOTOMETRIC PLAN | | | TO DETERMINE ANY CONFLICT WITH STREET TREES AND/OR | | | UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES. | | | 41. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE LOCATION OF | | | ALL ABOVE GROUND, ROOF MOUNTED, UNDERGROUND AND WALL | | | MOUNTED UTILITIES. PLEASE PLACE OUTSIDE ROW WITHIN SIDE | | | INTERIOR LOT LINES (IF POSSIBLE PER UTILITY | | | REQUIREMENTS) AND SCREEN TO BEST EXTENT POSSIBLE WITH | | | LANDSCAPE OR STRUCTURAL ARCHITECTURALLY COMPATIBLE | | | COVERING. SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY MARK HURLEY (FOR | | | DOMESTIC BACKFLOW AND WATER METERS), RAY CARANCI FOR | | | IRRIGATION METERS, TRACY WARD FOR STORMWATER DRAINAGE, | | | AND ALL APPLICABLE DEPARTMENTS | | | PLEASE RELOCATE WATER METER WITH RPZ FROM OUTSIDE AREAS | | | THAT ARE BEING TREATED AS PUBLIC OPEN SPACE (CANNOT | | | CONTAIN UTILITIES OR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT). PLEASE | | | COORDINATE WITH LANDSCAPE PLAN AS IT SEEMS STREET TREES | | | ARE PROPOSED DIRECTLY ABOVE UNDERGROUND LINES AND | | | DIRECTLY UNDER OVERHEAD LINES. COORDINATE WITH MARK | | | HURLEY, RAY CARANCI, AND ZONING. | | | 42. SATISFIED. | | | LANDSCAPE: | | | 43. SATISFIED | | | 44. SATISFIED | | | 45. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE WHICH TYPE OF | | | PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, SEMI-PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND PRIVATE | | | OPEN SPACE IS BEING PROPOSED BASED ON THE PERMITTED | | | TYPES IN THE ZONING DISTRICT (TABLE IV-6), AND MAKING | | | SURE THAT THE SELECTED TYPES MEETS THE DEFINITION | | | (SECTION 94-109) OF EACH SPECIFIC OPEN SPACE TYPE | | | (GARDEN, TERRACE, GARDEN PLAZA, ETC.), AND THAT THE | | | SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS OF EACH OPEN SPACE TYPE (TABLE | | | IV-7) ARE MET WITHIN THAT AREA. | | | PLEASE LABEL INDIVIDUAL AREAS WITH THE TYPE ASSOCIATED. | | | FOR EXAMPLE, WHICH AREA IS CONSIDERED ?GARDEN? PRIVATE | | | OPEN SPACE? | | | 46. SATISFIED. THE PORTION OF LANDSCAPE BETWEEN THE | | | PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE AND PROPERTY LINE WOULD NOT | | | MEET ANY OF THE DEFINITIONS OF TYPES OF PRIVATE OPEN | | | SPACE. CHECK PROPERTY LINE PLACEMENT HERE AS THE PHASE | | | I PARKING GARAGE APPEARS ON PAPA TO BE RIGHT UP ON THE | | | PROPERTY LINE | | | 47. SATISFIED | | | 48. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE ILLUSTRATE HOW THE PROPOSED | | | PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE SOUTH | | | BUILDING WILL CONNECT TO THE EXISTING AREA. PLEASE | | | REMOVE THE PROPOSED BUTTONWOOD SHRUB TO CONNECT HE OPEN | | | SPACES TOGETHER TO IMPROVE THE EXISTING OPEN SPACE AND | | | PROVIDE FOR PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY FOR THE PUBLIC | | | AREAS. EXPLORE REMOVING THE FENCE ON THE LOFTIN PHASE I | | | PROPERTY WITHIN THIS AREA TO BETTER CONNECT | | | AREA HAS NOT BEEN DESIGNED IN A MANNER TO CONNECT WITH | | | EXISTING OPEN SPACE. THE DESIGN SEEMS TO BE CATERED | | | TOWARDS THE PRIVATE SEATING OF THE RETAIL TENANT ON THE | | | GROUND FLOOR, NOT FOR PUBLIC USE. NEEDS TO BE MORE OPEN | | | TO SIDEWALK AND PUBLIC | | | 49. SATISFIED | | | 50. SATISFIED | | | 51. SATISFIED | | | 52. SATISFIED | | | NEW COMMENTS MARCH 30, 2021: | | | GENERAL: | | | 53. PLEASE ADD TURN AROUND PARKING SPACE ON TOP LEVEL | | | AND AT DEAD END BOTTOM LEVEL. TURN AROUND SPACES | | | REQUIRED FOR DEAD END ROWS. | | | 54. THERE IS PARKING ON THE BOTTOM FLOOR LABELED 7 | | | PARKING SPACES, BUT STAFF COUNTS 10. | | | 55. THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF | | | THE SOUTHERN BUILDING MAY NEED TO EXTEND A BIT FURTHER | | | SOUTH TO MEET THE REQUIREMENT OF 900 SF (PLEASE | | | DISREGARD IF ALREADY MEETING 900 SF). PLEASE INCLUDE | | | THE SF OF EACH INDIVIDUAL SECTION OF PRIVATE, PUBLIC | | | AND SEMI PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. | | | 56. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES TOWARDS THE | | | BUILDING FOOTPRINT CALCULATIONS. | | | 57. PLEASE INCLUDE PERCENTAGES OF BUILDING FOOTPRINT | | | PER BASE, PODIUM AND TOWER AS PERMITTED IN LD-4 AND | | | LD-10 WITHIN THE SITE DATA TABLE AND ON SHEET A-1.5 ? | | | A-1.7. | | | 58. THE TURNING RADIUS OF THE PARKING SPACES | | | IMMEDIATELY WITHIN THE PARKING GARAGE ENTRANCES MIGHT | | | BE TOO TIGHT, CONFIRM WITH TRAFFIC ENGINEER. | | | 59. THE SITE DATA TABLE INDICATES THE INCLUSION OF | | | MICROUNITS, HOWEVER, NONE OF THE UNITS MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENT FOR MICROUNIT SIZE. MICROUNITS ARE BETWEEN | | | 300 AND 549 SF. PLEASE REVISE SF OF UNITS, OR REVISE | | | SITE DATA TABLE AND PARKING IF NO MICROUNITS ARE BEING | | | INCLUDED. THE AMENITY SPACE IS SHOWN AT A HIGHER | | | ELEVATION THAN THE SIDEWALK LEVEL | | | 60. PLEASE INCLUDE THE AVERAGE UNIT SIZE. MINIMUM | | | AVERAGE UNIT SIZE IS 800 SF | | | 61. IF MICROUNITS ARE INCLUDED, A MICROMOBILITY STATION | | | IS REQUIRED AT A SIZE OF 8?X22? AND A CONDUIT (2? | | | SCHEDULE 40 PVC) SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE POWER SOURCE | | | WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V CIRCUIT). | | | 62. | | | | | | CIVIL: | | | 63. PLEASE CLARIFY IF BFP AND DDCV ILLUSTRATED ON THE | | | SOUTH SIDE OF EUCALYPTUS STREET ARE EXISTING OR IF ANY | | | NEW APPURTENANCES ARE PROPOSED. IF PROPOSED, NEED TO | | | CHECK WITH FIRE CHIEF AND PUBLIC UTILITIES WHETHER NEW | | | ITEMS CAN BE PLACED OFF SITE. | | | 64. PLEASE RELOCATE THE SPEED SIGN ON DIXIE HIGHWAY | | | (ADJACENT TO NORTHERN BUILDING) CLOSER TO THE CURB | | | LINE. | | | 65. THE PROPOSED THREE PHASE TRANSFORMERS ADJACENT TO | | | THE PARKING GARAGE ON EUCALYPTUS STREET CANNOT BE | | | PROPOSED IN THE CENTER OF THE SIDEWALK. PLEASE RELOCATE | | | TO APPROPRIATE LOCATION, CANNOT BE WITHIN THE MINIMUM | | | REQUIRED SETBACKS FROM STREET FRONTAGES. TRANSFORMERS | | | AND OTHER EQUIPMENT CANNOT PROJECT MORE THAN FOUR FEET | | | INTO A REQUIRED SIDE OR REAR SETBACK. | | | 66. PLEASE PROVIDE EXHIBIT OF WATER METER AREAS (CANNOT | | | BE LOCATED WITHIN PUBLIC OPEN SPACE), AND AN EXHIBIT OF | | | THE AREAS PROPOSED TO HAVE DDCV AND DOMESTIC WATER | | | SERVICE. | | | 67. THE SOUTHERN BUILDING FLOOR PLAN ON THE CIVIL PLANS | | | DO NOT MATCH THE LATEST ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR PLANS. | | | PLEASE UPDATE. | | | 68. THE LINE OF THE REQUIRED SETBACK ON THE CIVIL PLANS | | | DO NOT MATCH THE REQUIRED SETBACK. PLEASE COORDINATE | | | WITH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. | | | | | | | | | LANDSCAPE: | | | 69. PLEASE LOOK AT MEANS OF DESIGNING THE PUBLIC OPEN | | | SPACES, INCLUDING THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE THAT IS ON THE | | | GROUND FLOOR AND DESIGNED AS PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, IN A | | | WAY THAT WILL PROVIDE AN AREA FOR THE PUBLIC ENJOYMENT. | | | PLEASE EVALUATE USE OF LANDSCAPING, HARDSCAPE AND | | | ORIENTATION OF LINEAR SEATING. | | | 70. THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE CONFLICTS WITH OVERHEAD | | | POWER LINES, PLEASE COORDINATE WITH RAY CARANCI AND FPL | | | 71. PLEASE PROVIDE LANDSCAPE SCREENING AROUND THE | | | PROPOSED TRANSFORMERS, WATER METER, DDCV AND ALL ABOVE | | | GROUND UTILITIES. FROM UTILITIES PERSPECTIVE, BACKFLOW | | | ASSEMBLIES NEED 18? CLEARANCE FOR MAINTENANCE AND | | | TESTING. ENGINEERING SUGGESTS LANDSCAPE SCREENING TO | | | PREVENT TAMPERING WITH BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES. | | | 72. PLEASE RELOCATE THE BENCHES PROPOSED WITHIN THE | | | PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AREAS TO NOT DIVERT THE SIDEWALK | | | PATH. | | | 73. PLEASE INCORPORATE LANDSCAPE AROUND ALL ABOVE | | | GROUND UTILITIES INCLUDE TRANSFORMER LOCATIONS. THE | | | PLANS SHOW THE UTILITIES BUT THERE ARE SOME CONFLICTS | | | WITH PROPOSED LANDSCAPING AND UTILITIES, BOTH ABOVE AND | | | UNDER GROUND UTILITIES. | | | 74. PLEASE ENSURE THAT PROPOSED LANDSCAPE WITHIN FPL | | | EASEMENT ON DIXIE HIGHWAY WILL BE PERMITTED. COORDINATE | | | WITH FPL AND RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER AT THE | | | CITY. | | | ARCHITECTURAL: | | | 75. THE SECOND FLOOR WINDOW AT THE SOUTHERN CORNER OF | | | THE SOUTHERN BUILDING?S EAST ELEVATION (INTERNAL) DOES | | | NOT SEEM TO MATCH THE FLOOR PLAN. | | | 76. THE SECOND FLOOR WINDOW AT THE SOUTH END OF THE | | | WEST ELEVATION (SOUTHERN BUILDING) DOES NOT APPEAR TO | | | MATCH THE WINDOW PROPOSED IN THE FLOOR PLAN. | | | 77. ALONG THE EAST ELEVATION OF THE SOUTHERN BUILDING, | | | THE FLOOR PLAN ILLUSTRATES A WATER ROOM. THE ELEVATION | | | SHOWS A WINDOW ON THIS ROOM BUT THE WINDOW IS NOT | | | REFLECT ON THE FLOOR PLAN. | | | 78. THE LOCATION OF THE STAIRWAY FOR THE NORTHERN MOST | | | GROUND FLOOR UNIT ON THE WEST ELEVATION OF THE SOUTHERN | | | BUILDING DOES NOT MATCH THE FLOOR PLAN. | | | 79. THERE IS A VERTICAL ROW OF WINDOWS AT THE NORTH | | | CORNER OF THE WEST ELEVATION (SOUTHERN BUILDING) THAT | | | DOES NOT APPEAR ON THE SITE PLAN. ALSO ON THE NORTH | | | ELEVATION (8TH STREET) OF THE NORTHERN BUILDING. PLEASE | | | UPDATE FLOOR PLANS TO REFLECT WINDOW OR UPDATE | | | ELEVATION. IF THERE ARE NO WINDOWS PLEASE INCLUDE | | | FENESTRATION | | | 80. THE EAST ELEVATION OF THE SOUTHERN BUILDING SHOWS A | | | GROUND FLOOR DOOR AT THE NORTH CORNER BUT THIS DOES NOT | | | APPEAR ON THE FLOOR PLAN. | | | 81. FENESTRATION IS REQUIRED ALONG THE GROUND FLOOR AND | | | PODIUM OF THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE EAST ELEVATION, | | | PER TABLE IV-4. BLANK WALLS ARE NOT PERMITTED. | | | 82. PLEASE UPDATE THE BUILDING SECTIONS TO SHOW THE | | | TRAVEL PAVEMENT AND SIDEWALK ON ALL SIDES OF THE | | | PROPOSED STRUCTURE. PLEASE ACCURATELY SHOW THE TRAVEL | | | LANE, CURB AND SIDEWALK ELEVATIONS ON SECTIONS. | | | 83. PLEASE SHOW THE GAS STATION ON DIXIE BOULEVARD | | | (NORTH OF 8TH STREET) ON THE CONTEXTUAL ELEVATIONS. | | | 84. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PUBLIC SPACE WITHIN RENDERINGS. | | | PROPOSED PROVISOS: | | | 1. AN AMENDMENT TO HE RESTRICTIVE COVENANT MAY BE | | | REQUIRED IF NECESSARY PENDING ENGINEERING AND LEGAL | | | REVIEW | | | 2. ALL ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN | | | SIDE INTERIOR LOT LINES IF POSSIBLE AND SCREENED BY | | | LANDSCAPE, HARDSCAPE OR ARCHITECTURALLY COMPATIBLE | | | SCREENING. FIELD LOCATES SHALL BE SUBJECT TO ZONING | | | APPROVAL | | | 3. ALL PARKING GARAGE CEILINGS SHALL BE PAINTED | | | (INCLUDING CEILING PIPES AND UTILITIES) TO A DEPTH OF | | | 20 FEET FROM ENTRANCES/EXITS AND FROM ALL OPENINGS | | | 4. APPLICANT SHALL ENTER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH | | | CITY FOR ALL STREETSCAPE UPGRADES (TREES, TREE GRATES, | | | BENCHES, LANDSCAPE, ETC) WITHIN THE CITY OWNED ROW TO | | | INCLUDE BUS SHELTER | | | 5. THE SIDEWALK SHALL BE KEPT LEVEL ACROSS CURB CUTS | | | 6. A SIDEWALK EASEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR PUBLIC | | | SIDEWALK WITHIN PRIVATE PROPERTY | | | 7. PER THE DECLARATION OF RESTRICTION IN ORB 28411 PG. | | | 1108, AN ADDITIONAL SETBACK MAY BE REQUIRED FOR THE | | | PROPOSED BUILDING FROM THE EDGE GARAGE. THE REQUIRED | | | SETBACK DEPENDS ON THE PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS ON THE | | | PROPOSED STRUCTURE?S EAST FA?ADE | | | 8. 20? STACKING DISTANCE REQUIRED IF PARKING GARAGE | | | WILL BE GATED AND THE PARKING FOR RETAIL NEEDS TO BE | | | PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE | | | 9. PLEASE NOTE, TRANSIT FEE (TROLLEY) CONTRIBUTION FEE | | | PER SECTION 94-106(A)(8A)- CONTRIBUTION IS $10 PER | | | MICROUNIT PER MONTH | | | 10. THE DECLARATION OF EASEMENTS (ORB 28271 PAGE 144) | | | MAY HAVE TO BE UPDATED AND AMENDED AS NECESSARY SUBJECT | | | TO CITY ENGINEERING AND CITY LEGAL REVIEW | | | 11. PLEASE WALL MOUNT ALL FDC ? SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY | | | CHIEF PETER LEDUC | | | 12. FDOT PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL ROW | | | IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN DIXIE HIGHWAY | | | | | | | | | LIZ LEVESQUE, URBAN DESIGN PLANNER | | | [email protected], 561 822 1426 | | | | | | AFTER APRIL 2, 2021 PLEASE CONTACT: | | | ANA MARIA APONTE, CITY URBAN DESIGNER | | | 561 822 1439 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-29-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
elevesqu |
Date |
01-29-2021 |
Time |
15:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
elevesqu |
Date |
01-29-2021 |
Time |
15:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-01-29 15:44:00 | GENERAL COMMENTS/ARCHITECTURAL : | | | 1. PLEASE DISTINGUISH PROPERTY LINE FROM LD-4 ZONING | | | LINE. THE EASTERN PROPERTY LINE OF THE SOUTHERN | | | STRUCTURE LOT APPEARS TO BE SHOW IN AN INCORRECT | | | LOCATION ON THE ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS AND | | | THE EXISTING PARKING GARAGE IS NOT SHOWN IN THE CORRECT | | | LOCATION. BASED ON THE SURVEY, THE EAST PROPERTY LINE | | | IS APPROX. 180 FEET FROM THE WESTERN PROPERTY LINE. THE | | | EXISTING PHASE I PARKING GARAGE IS BUILT RIGHT UP TO | | | THIS PROPERTY LINE. | | | 2. BY ZONING REGULATIONS FOR LD-4-12, A 5? SETBACK IS | | | REQUIRED ALONG THE SIDE INTERIOR/REAR SETBACK (EASTERN | | | PROPERTY LINE) FOR SOUTH BUILDING (LD-4-12 TABLE | | | IV-52). HOWEVER, EXISTING LOFTIN PHASE I PARKING GARAGE | | | IS BUILT RIGHT UP TO INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK. PER THE | | | DECLARATION OF RESTRICTION IN ORB 28411 PG. 1108, AN | | | ADDITIONAL SETBACK MAY BE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED | | | BUILDING FROM THE EDGE GARAGE. THE REQUIRED SETBACK | | | DEPENDS ON THE PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS ON THE PROPOSED | | | STRUCTURE?S EAST FA?ADE | | | 3. PLEASE ADD STAIRS FOR GROUND FLOOR ACCESS TO THE | | | RESIDENTIAL UNITS | | | 4. A PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT (ITEM NO. 10 ORB 28271 | | | PAGE 144, ITEM H) EXISTS ON THE BOUNDARY SURVEY THAT | | | CONNECTS THE ROW SIDEWALK TO THE GARAGE OF THE LOFTIN | | | PHASE I STRUCTURE BUT THIS IS NOT INCORPORATED INTO THE | | | PROPOSED DESIGN. PLEASE CLARIFY HOW ACCESS WILL REMAIN | | | TO THIS PARKING GARAGE/UTILITY AREA | | | 5. THERE WAS A BUS SHELTER ON THE SOUTH PORTION OF | | | PHASE II THAT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN REMOVED UNTIL PHASE | | | II WAS CONSTRUCTED, WHEN A REPLACEMENT SHELTER WAS TO | | | BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE NORTH BUILDING STREET. THE | | | SHELTER WAS REMOVED AT SOME POINT, AND NEVER REPLACED. | | | A BUS SHELTER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS PART OF THIS | | | PHASE II PROCESS. PLEASE CONSTRUCT IN ARCHITECTURALLY | | | COMPATIBLE DESIGN. PALM TRAN PREFERS THE SHELTER REMAIN | | | ON THE BLOCK BETWEEN EUCALYPTUS AND 8TH, WITHIN | | | PROXIMITY TO THE EXISTING BUS STOP POLE. | | | 6. PLEASE EVALUATE LOCATION OF COLUMNS FOR PEDESTRIAN | | | BRIDGE- THESE SHOULD BE LOCATED OUTSIDE THE MINIMUM | | | SETBACK AND NOT WITHIN THE CITY ROW | | | 7. 30% OF THE EXPOSED ROOF PARKING MUST BE COVERED WITH | | | VEGETATED AREA, OR 30% OF COVERED STRUCTURES LIKE THE | | | PROPOSED TRELLIS. THE PROPOSED TRELLIS COVERS | | | APPROXIMATELY 13% OF THE EXPOSED ROOF. PLEASE EXPAND OR | | | PROVIDE OTHER MEANS OF MEETING THE 30% REQUIREMENT (OR | | | ALTERNATE MEANS OF ART MURAL PER SECTION | | | 94-111(Q)(4)(D) | | | 8. PLEASE SHOW DOUBLE STRIPING IN PARKING GARAGE AND | | | INCLUDE PARKING LOT STRIPING DETAIL PER SECTION 94-485 | | | 9. PLEASE SHOW OUTLINE OF BUILDINGS ON WEST SIDE OF | | | DIXIE ON ALL PLANS | | | 10. PLEASE PROVIDE FOLLOWING EXHIBITS: | | | A. ACTIVE USE | | | B. FOOTPRINT | | | C. TRANSPARENCY | | | D. PLANAR BREAK | | | E. HORIZONTAL ELEMENTS | | | F. FAR | | | 11. PLEASE NOTE, PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES COUNT AS GBA | | | 12. PLEASE PROVIDE A TABLE ILLUSTRATING BREAKDOWN OF | | | SITE PLAN AREA WITH SPECIFIC ZONING/INCENTIVE ZONING | | | WITH ALLOWABLE FAR PER SPECIFIC ZONING AND ALLOWABLE | | | GSF PER AREA WITH A TOTAL (SIMILAR TO TABLE DONE IN | | | 2013 FOR LOFTIN PHASE I AND II BY MSA ARCHITECTS). | | | PLEASE INDICATE INCENTIVE ZONING IN SITE DATA TABLE | | | 13. PLEASE INCLUDE FOLLOWING DATA IN SITE DATA TABLE: | | | A. BUILDING FOOTPRINT PERCENTAGE ? SEE TABLES IV-51 AND | | | IV-52 AT END OF SECTION 94-134 | | | 14. PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE APPEARS TO TERMINATE INTO A | | | RESIDENTIAL UNIT IN THE SOUTH BUILDING. PLEASE CLARIFY | | | 15. WILL THE PARKING GARAGE BE GATED? PLEASE NOTE THAT | | | A 20? STACKING DISTANCE FROM ROW IS REQUIRED AND THE | | | PARKING FOR RETAIL NEEDS TO BE PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE | | | 16. THE 4 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES (1 PER 100? OF | | | FRONTAGE) APPEARS TO BE TOO FEW. THE REQUIREMENT IS PER | | | ALL STREET FRONTAGES (NORTH DIXIE HIGHWAY, EUCALYPTUS | | | STREET, 8TH STREET). THESE BIKE PARKING SPACES NEED TO | | | BE ON THE ROW OR ACCESSIBLE BY THE GENERAL PUBLIC (SEE | | | BICYCLE PARKING GUIDELINES PREVIOUSLY SENT BY EMAIL). | | | PLEASE PROVIDE BICYCLE RACK SPECS | | | 17. PLEASE ADD LABELS ON INDIVIDUAL PARKING SPACES THAT | | | WILL BE RESERVED FOR RETAIL AND FOR GUEST PARKING | | | 18. PLEASE PROVIDE GUEST PARKING AT RATE OF 1/20 | | | REQUIRED MINIMUM PARKING SPACES (FOR ALL UNITS | | | INCLUDING MICRO) AND INCLUDE IN PARKING DATA TABLE | | | 19. PLEASE UPDATE REQUIRED PARKING TABLE BASED ON | | | MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM REQUIRED, NOT PROVIDED PARKING. | | | REQUIRED PARKING FOR RESIDENTIAL USE IS MIN. 1/UNIT AND | | | MAX. 2/UNIT. MICROUNITS IS MIN. 0/UNIT AND MAX | | | 0.5/UNIT. RETAIL IS 2/1000 SF AND 4/1000 SF. PLEASE | | | INCLUDE ADA PARKING REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PER LATEST | | | BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENT | | | 20. ONE OF THE PARKING ROWS ON FIRST FLOOR IS LABELED | | | WITH 15 PARKING SPACES BUT STAFF COUNTS 13 | | | 21. REQUIRED BIKE PARKING FOR MICROUNITS (FOR LESS THAN | | | 13 MICROUNITS) IS ONE BIKE PARKING SPACE PER UNIT. | | | PLEASE INCLUDE IN BIKE PARKING TABLE ? ONLY APPLIES TO | | | THE 8 MICROUNITS, THE OTHERS FALL UNDER THE 1/15 | | | PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENT. ALL BICYCLE PARKING FOR | | | RESIDENTIAL USE SHOULD BE IN A SECURE AND COVERED | | | LOCATION (INSIDE PARKING GARAGE IS FINE, BUT PLEASE | | | ILLUSTRATE HOW BEING SECURED) | | | 22. PLEASE NOTE, TRANSIT FEE (TROLLEY) CONTRIBUTION FEE | | | PER SECTION 94-106(A)(8A)- CONTRIBUTION IS $10 PER | | | MICROUNIT PER MONTH | | | 23. PLEASE PROVIDE LOS FOR TRASH COLLECTION TO | | | DETERMINE REQUIRED COMPACTORS/DUMPSTERS WITHIN PROPOSED | | | TRASH ROOM. HOW IS TRASH COLLECTION WORKING FOR SOUTH | | | BUILDING? PLEASE SPEAK TO MATT HEJAZI REGARDING LOS AND | | | NEEDED COMPACTORS/DUMPSTERS AND LOCATION FOR | | | DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR STAGING ON PICK UP DAY | | | 24. THE EAST ELEVATION OF THE SOUTHERN BUILDING | | | (SECTION 7 ON PAGE A-3.7) DOES NOT SEEM TO MATCH THE | | | FLOOR PLANS. THERE ARE SOME GROUND FLOOR ELEVATIONS | | | THAT HAVE THE APPEARANCE OF COMMERCIAL WINDOWS BUT ARE | | | RESIDENTIAL UNITS. PLEASE UPDATE ELEVATIONS TO REFLECT | | | SITE PLAN | | | 25. PLEASE INCLUDE ACTUAL SCORING OR MATERIAL CHANGE ON | | | THE CORNER ELEMENTS, NOT JUST PAINTED SCORING | | | 26. ON FACADES ENCLOSING NON-ACTIVE USE (PARKING | | | GARAGE), ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED NOT | | | TO INCLUDE PAINT AND FAUX TREATMENTS, MATERIAL | | | APPLICATIONS LESS THAN 4 INCHES IN HEIGHT, DEPTH OR | | | WIDTH, OR BUILDING SIGNS. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SHALL BE | | | INTEGRATED WITH DESIGN OF ADJACENT ACTIVE USE FACADES. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT ON | | | PARKING GARAGE. SEE DEFINITION IN SECTION 94-109. | | | EVALUATE MEANS OF REDUCING IMPACT OF RAMP FACING | | | EUCALYPTUS STREET | | | 27. PLEASE SHOW PROPERTY LINES ON ELEVATIONS | | | 28. PLEASE REMOVE PEOPLE WALKING FROM ELEVATION A-3.3 | | | (SIDE LOT LINE) TO SHOW THAT THIS IS AN INTERIOR LOT | | | LINE | | | 29. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATION WITH A LINE OR OTHER | | | MEANS ON MASSING STUDY BETWEEN PHASE I AND PROPOSED | | | CIELO PROJECT | | | 30. PLEASE PROVIDE: | | | A. BUILDING SECTIONS | | | B. CONTEXTUAL ELEVATIONS | | | C. GROUND FLOOR COLORED, CONTEXTUAL RENDERINGS WITH | | | PLANTING HEIGHT LANDSCAPE | | | D. MATERIAL SAMPLE IMAGERY AND MATERIAL SPECIFICATION | | | DETAIL | | | E. EXHIBITS OF SCORING LINE DEPTHS AND MATERIAL | | | SECTIONS | | | ENGINEERING | | | 31. SUBMIT UPDATED CIVIL PLANS REFLECTING NEW PROPOSAL | | | AND INDICATE WHAT WAS COMPLETED WITH PHASE I AND WHAT | | | IS PROPOSED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION AND UPDATE | | | AERIAL IMAGERY TO CURRENT DAY | | | 32. PLEASE SHOW DOUBLE STRIPING IN PARKING GARAGE AND | | | INCLUDE PARKING LOT STRIPING DETAIL PER SECTION 94-485 | | | 33. PLEASE SHOW OUTLINE OF BUILDINGS ON WEST SIDE OF | | | DIXIE ON ALL PLANS | | | 34. PLEASE PROVIDE UPDATED CROSS SECTIONS INCLUDING: | | | A. SIDEWALK SECTIONS ADJACENT TO PARALLEL PARKING | | | SPACES | | | B. SIDEWALK SECTIONS ADJACENT TO RETAIL/COMMERCIAL DOOR | | | ENTRANCES | | | C. SIDEWALK SECTIONS ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL UNITS | | | 35. ALL LARGE GRADING CHANGES SHALL BE CAPTURED WITHIN | | | BUILDING NOT WITHIN SIDEWALK OR ROW | | | 36. ILLUSTRATE INTERSECTION ADA RAMPS THAT MATCH THOSE | | | ACROSS THE STREET ON ALL SIDES (SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER) | | | 37. PLAN REFERENCES THE REMOVAL OF TRAFFIC CALMING ON | | | 6TH STREET. IS THIS PROPOSED AS PART OF THIS | | | APPLICATION? PLEASE CLARIFY WHY IF SO | | | 38. A PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT (ITEM NO. 10 ORB 28271 | | | PAGE 144, ITEM H) EXISTS ON THE BOUNDARY SURVEY THAT | | | CONNECTS THE ROW SIDEWALK TO THE GARAGE OF THE LOFTIN | | | PHASE I STRUCTURE BUT THIS IS NOT INCORPORATED INTO THE | | | PROPOSED DESIGN. PLEASE CLARIFY HOW ACCESS WILL REMAIN | | | TO THIS PARKING GARAGE/UTILITY AREA | | | 39. THE DECLARATION OF EASEMENTS (ORB 28271 PAGE 144) | | | MAY HAVE TO BE UPDATED AND AMENDED AS NECESSARY SUBJECT | | | TO CITY ENGINEERING AND CITY LEGAL REVIEW | | | 40. PLEASE PROVIDE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN FOR ALL ROW | | | INCLUDING PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, GARAGE ENTRANCES AND | | | EXITS, ALL SIDEWALKS, ANY SIDEWALKS LEADING INTO | | | BUILDING OR GARAGE AND INCLUDE LIGHT POLE SPECS | | | 41. PLEASE INDICATE LOCATION OF ALL ABOVE GROUND, ROOF | | | MOUNTED, UNDERGROUND AND WALL MOUNTED UTILITIES. PLEASE | | | PLACE OUTSIDE ROW WITHIN SIDE INTERIOR LOT LINES (IF | | | POSSIBLE PER UTILITY REQUIREMENTS) AND SCREEN TO BEST | | | EXTENT POSSIBLE WITH LANDSCAPE OR STRUCTURAL | | | ARCHITECTURALLY COMPATIBLE COVERING. SUBJECT TO REVIEW | | | BY MARK HURLEY (FOR DOMESTIC BACKFLOW AND WATER | | | METERS), RAY CARANCI FOR IRRIGATION METERS, TRACY WARD | | | FOR STORMWATER DRAINAGE, AND ALL APPLICABLE DEPARTMENTS | | | 42. PLEASE WALL MOUNT ALL FDC ? SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY | | | CHIEF PETER LEDUC | | | LANDSCAPE: | | | 43. PLEASE ENSURE PROPERTY LINE IS SHOWN IN CORRECT | | | LOCATION (SEE COMMENT IN ARCHITECTURAL SECTION) | | | 44. PLEASE EXTEND PLANTER BED ALONG AREAS ADJACENT TO | | | PARALLEL PARKING WITH SMALL CUT THRU FOR PEDESTRIANS IN | | | ACCESSIBLE LOCATIONS | | | 45. PLEASE INDICATE WHICH TYPE OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, | | | SEMI-PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS BEING | | | PROPOSED BASED ON THE PERMITTED TYPES IN THE ZONING | | | DISTRICT (TABLE IV-6), AND MAKING SURE THAT THE | | | SELECTED TYPES MEETS THE DEFINITION (SECTION 94-109) OF | | | EACH SPECIFIC OPEN SPACE TYPE (GARDEN, TERRACE, GARDEN | | | PLAZA, ETC.), AND THAT THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS OF | | | EACH OPEN SPACE TYPE (TABLE IV-7) ARE MET WITHIN THAT | | | AREA. | | | 46. THE PORTION OF LANDSCAPE BETWEEN THE PROPOSED | | | PARKING GARAGE AND PROPERTY LINE WOULD NOT MEET ANY OF | | | THE DEFINITIONS OF TYPES OF PRIVATE OPEN SPACE. CHECK | | | PROPERTY LINE PLACEMENT HERE AS THE PHASE I PARKING | | | GARAGE APPEARS ON PAPA TO BE RIGHT UP ON THE PROPERTY | | | LINE | | | 47. THE DOG PARK CANNOT BE DESIGNED AS A PRIVATE | | | AMENITY AND BE COUNTED AS PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. IT WOULD | | | HAVE TO BE OPEN TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC TO BE CONSIDERED | | | A PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. SEE DEFINITION OF PUBLIC OPEN | | | SPACE IN SECTION 94-109. THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE | | | UTILIZED MUST BE PERMITTED WITHIN THE DISTRICT (LD-4 OR | | | LD-10) AND THE REQUIREMENTS ARE IN TABLE IV-7 FOR EACH | | | TYPE OF OPEN SPACE. THIS AREA HAS THE ABILITY TO MEET | | | SOME REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. THE TYPES CAN | | | BE EITHER GARDEN COURTYARD OR GARDEN PLAZA | | | 48. PLEASE ILLUSTRATE HOW THE PROPOSED PUBLIC OPEN | | | SPACE AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE SOUTH BUILDING WILL | | | CONNECT TO THE EXISTING AREA. PLEASE REMOVE THE | | | PROPOSED BUTTONWOOD SHRUB TO CONNECT HE OPEN SPACES | | | TOGETHER TO IMPROVE THE EXISTING OPEN SPACE AND PROVIDE | | | FOR PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY FOR THE PUBLIC AREAS. | | | EXPLORE REMOVING THE FENCE ON THE LOFTIN PHASE I | | | PROPERTY WITHIN THIS AREA TO BETTER CONNECT | | | 49. PLEASE REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF HARDSCAPE WITHIN THE | | | PASSAGE AREAS TO THE NORTH COURTYARD AND INCLUDE | | | PLANTING AREAS | | | 50. THE AREAS AROUND THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS CAN BE | | | COUNTED AS SEMI-PUBLIC WALK UP GARDENS ONLY IN THE | | | PORTIONS THAT MEET THE REQUIREMENT OF 7 FEET DEPTH. | | | PLEASE ADD STAIRS FOR GROUND FLOOR ACCESS FROM THE | | | STREET. THESE LANDSCAPE AREAS COULD BE COUNTED AS | | | PRIVATE OPEN SPACE GARDEN TYPE IF A 4-FOOT WALL IS | | | PLACED (TO MEET DEFINITION OF GARDEN IN SECTION 94-109) | | | THE AREAS ADJACENT TO THE RETAIL/COMMERCIAL SPACES | | | DON?T MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. | | | 51. THE AREAS COUNTED AS SEMI-PUBLIC OPEN SPACE WHICH | | | EXCEED THE PERCENTAGE OF REQUIRED SEMI PUBLIC COULD BE | | | COUNTED TOWARDS THE PERCENTAGE OF REQUIRED PRIVATE OPEN | | | SPACE, BUT HAVE TO BE TREATED AS A PERMITTED PUBLIC | | | OPEN SPACE TYPE IN LD-10/LD-4 AND OPEN TO THE GENERAL | | | PUBLIC | | | 52. THE PORTION OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AT THE SOUTH SIDE | | | OF THE NORTH BUILDING WOULD NOT BE MEET THE REQUIREMENT | | | FOR MINIMUM SIZE, WHICH REQUIRES THAT NO ONE SIDE CAN | | | BE 5 TIME THE LENGTH OF ANY OTHER SIDE AS THE LENGTH | | | EXCEEDS THE DEPTH BY OVER 5X | | | PROPOSED PROVISOS: | | | 1. AN AMENDMENT TO HE RESTRICTIVE COVENANT MAY BE | | | REQUIRED IF NECESSARY PENDING ENGINEERING AND LEGAL | | | REVIEW | | | 2. ALL ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN | | | SIDE INTERIOR LOT LINES IF POSSIBLE AND SCREENED BY | | | LANDSCAPE, HARDSCAPE OR ARCHITECTURALLY COMPATIBLE | | | SCREENING. FIELD LOCATES SHALL BE SUBJECT TO ZONING | | | APPROVAL | | | 3. ALL PARKING GARAGE CEILINGS SHALL BE PAINTED | | | (INCLUDING CEILING PIPES AND UTILITIES) TO A DEPTH OF | | | 20 FEET FROM ENTRANCES/EXITS AND FROM ALL OPENINGS | | | 4. APPLICANT SHALL ENTER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH | | | CITY FOR ALL STREETSCAPE UPGRADES (TREES, TREE GRATES, | | | BENCHES, LANDSCAPE, ETC) WITHIN THE CITY OWNED ROW TO | | | INCLUDE BUS SHELTER | | | 5. THE SIDEWALK SHALL BE KEPT LEVEL ACROSS CURB CUTS | | | 6. A SIDEWALK EASEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR PUBLIC | | | SIDEWALK WITHIN PRIVATE PROPERTY | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |