Plan Review Details - Project Z20120033
Plan Review Stops For Project Z20120033
Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No 1 Status P Date 05-17-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By scwelter Date 01-29-2021 Time 15:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By scwelter Date 01-29-2021 Time 15:02 Sent To  
Notes
2021-01-29 14:30:3005.17.2021 APPLICANT ACKNOWLEDGED CONTRIBUTION AT 75%
 (-25%) FOR PUBLIC ART IN THE PPRC RESUBMITTAL LETTER.
 PASS FOR PUBLIC ART ART IS CONTINGENT ON THE FOLLOWING:
 THAT AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL THE
 CONTRIBUTION IS PAID IN FULL AND A RECEIPT OF SUCH
 PAYMENT IS SENT TO MY ATTENTION. [email protected].
 ALSO, A COMPLETED (SIGNED AND DATED) ART ASSESSMENT
 APPLICATION ACKNOWLEDGING OPTION 2 MUST BE SENT TO
 [email protected]. INVOICE WILL BE PROVIDED AFTER
 SUBMITTAL.
  
  
 PUBLIC ART 1% PROGRAM - BY ORDINANCE ALL PRIVATE
 DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, INCLUDING NEW CONSTRUCTION, OR
 THE RENOVATION OR IMPROVEMENT OF AN EXISTING BUILDING,
 WHERE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER
 THAN $500,000 ARE SUBJECT TO THE ART ASSESSMENT. ALL
 BUILDINGS WITHIN NEW PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS SHALL BE
 ASSESSED CUMULATIVELY TOWARDS THIS PUBLIC ART
 REQUIREMENT, EVEN IF THE BUILDINGS ARE PERMITTED
 SEPARATELY OR DEVELOPED IN PHASES. OPTION 1: INSTALL
 AND ARTWORK ON THE DEVELOPMENT SITE VALUED IN AN AMOUNT
 NOT LESS THAN ONE PERCENT OF THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION
 COSTS; OR OPTION 2: CONTRIBUTE AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO 75
 PERCENT (-25%) OF ONE PERCENT OF THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION
 COSTS FOR DEPOSIT TO THE PUBLIC ART ACCOUNT.
  
 THIS DEVELOPMENT IS SUBJECT TO THE ART ASSESSMENT.
 PLEASE EMAIL SYBILLE WELTER [email protected] SUBJECT
 LINE: ART ASSESSMENT APPLICATION - WITH YOUR PROJECT
 NUMBER
 FAILED UNTIL ART ASSESSMENT COMPLETED, SIGNED AND
 RETURNED, CALL 561.822.1521 WITH FURTHER QUESTIONS.
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 02-10-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 02-10-2021 Time 20:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 02-10-2021 Time 20:34 Sent To  
Notes
2021-02-10 20:37:08DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AN ASBESTOS
 SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT
 REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH
 COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963,
 OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 3. FLOOD ZONE. ACCORDING TO THE ADOPTED FLOOD INSURANCE
 RATE MAPS (FIRMS), THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS IN FLOOD
 ZONE AE, WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 12.1 FT NAVD.
 THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL ASSOCIATED
 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS ETC.) SHALL
 BE 24 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD
 ELEVATION.
  
 4. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 5. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND
 OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF
 OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF
 CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE
 VERIFIED. THE EQUIVALENT REQUIREMENTS FOR ONE AND TWO
 FAMILY DWELLINGS, AND TOWNHOUSES ARE IN SECTION R302 OF
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE (RESIDENTIAL).
  
 6. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 7. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
 CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.
  
 8. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
 AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
 CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
 THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.
  
 9. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
 WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
 HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
 OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
 CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 10. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
 TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE
 ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 4 Status P Date 06-25-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 06-25-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 06-25-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 3 Status F Date 05-18-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 05-18-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 05-18-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-18 18:06:09PLEASE UPDATE CIVIL PLAN SHEET C3.1 TO SHOW REPLACEMENT
 OF WATER AND SEWER MAINS ON DOCK ST. PER LAURA LE?S
 DIRECTION (SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW.)
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD
 CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES,
 PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]:
  
 5. WILL THE LARGE OUTSIDE POOL HAVE AUTOFILL? IF SO,
 WHERE WILL THE WATER COME FROM TO FILL IT?
 RESPONSE: THE PLUNGE POOLS WILL NOT HAVE AUTOFILL
 SYSTEMS PER INFORMATION PROVIDED BY DEVELOPER AND
 ARCHITECT.
 NOT SATISFIED ? REFERRING TO LARGE OUTSIDE POOL NEAR
 LOT 14. THINK RESPONSE WAS TALKING ABOUT INDOOR SMALL
 JACUZZIS.
  
 NEW COMMENTS:
  
 -ON THE CIVIL AND LANDSCAPING PLANS THERE IS AN OBJECT
 ENCROACHING IN THE DRIVEWAY/ROAD ON THE WEST SIDE OF
 LOT 13. LOOKS LIKE IT MAY BE A UTILITY POLE GUY WIRE,
 AND MIGHT GET HIT BY VEHICLE. SITE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW
 THAT OBJECT.
  
 -THERE ARE TREES CLOSE TO METER BOX AT LOT 1 AND LOT
 14. PLEASE REVIEW TO SEE IF ROOT CONFLICT WITH WATER
 UTILITIES. ADD ROOT BARRIERS AS NEEDED BETWEEN WATER
 UTILITIES AND THE WESTERN TREES.
  
 -THE METER BOX SIZE AND SERVICE LINE SIZE MAY NEED TO
 BE INCREASED FOR LOT 14 AT FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL
 DUE TO SERVICE LINE LENGTH.
  
 -PLEASE ADD ADDRESS TO CIVIL PLANS AT FORMAL
 ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL.
  
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS.
 RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT
 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 [email protected]
  
  
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 04-06-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 04-06-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 04-06-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-04-06 06:51:31COMMENT PER LAURA LE, CITY OF WPB UTILITIES ENG.,
 [email protected] - THE WATER MAIN AND SAN SEWER MAIN BETWEEN
 FLAMINGO DR AND PARKER AVE WILL NEED TO BE REPLACED.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD
 CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES,
 PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]:
  
 -CANNOT SEE BOUNDARIES OF 5 FOOT UE FOR FM. PLEASE MAKE
 MORE VISIBLE ON WATER PLAN.
  
 -DUAL WATER SERVICES ARE ALSO NON-STANDARD. MAY NEED TO
 FURTHER SEPARATE THEM AT FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL.
  
 -ADDITIONAL DIRECTION ON WATER MAIN WORK MAY BE
 PROVIDED AT FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL.
  
 -LOT 6 APPEARS TO BE MISSING A METERED WATER SERVICE.
  
 -WILL THE LARGE OUTSIDE POOL HAVE AUTOFILL? IF SO,
 WHERE WILL THE WATER COME FROM TO FILL IT?
  
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS.
 RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT
 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 02-04-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 02-04-2021 Time   Rev Time  
Received By rrossano Date 02-04-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-02-04 11:40:071. THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF
 REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY
 AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND
 WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. TO VIEW
 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER
 ENGINEERING RELATED DOCUMENTS, OPEN A BROWSER IN CHROME
 AND GO TO: WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGDOCS . TO LOGIN, UNDER
 ?EMAIL? ENTER [email protected] ; UNDER ?PASSWORD? ENTER
 SIMPLE321#
 THERE ARE 4 PAGES OF AVAILABLE ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS
 FOR YOUR USE.
 2. CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH,
 FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08, ADOPTED
 SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18) CHAPTER 90
 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. SEC. 90-7.
 POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER SERVICE
 FACILITIES OF THE CITY:
 THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
 BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
 BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
 3. AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
 MORE INFORMATION, OPEN A BROWSER IN CHROME AND GO TO:
 WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGDOCS .TO LOGIN, UNDER ?EMAIL? ENTER
 [email protected] ; UNDER ?PASSWORD? ENTER SIMPLE321#
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL IS ON PAGE 4.
 4. PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC
 RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF
 YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
 MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
 IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
 [email protected] OR 561-494-1040 FOR FURTHER
 ASSISTANCE.
 5. PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS
 OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES,
 INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND
 SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES,
 METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE
 SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING
 GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS,
 ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL
 INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER
 LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN
 VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
 PLEASE SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT
 MATERIAL. ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL
 EXISTING AND PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT,
 INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &
 TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL
 UTILITY CROSSINGS.
 6. CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY
 ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
 ROW.
 7. PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE
 DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB
 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION).
 8. PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER ON
 DOCK ST. AND STORMWATER ALONG FLAMINGO DRIVE PROJECT
 FRONTAGE.
 9. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND
 IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED
 AREAS.
 10. PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
 PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
 11. PLEASE LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE
 APPLICABLE.
 12. PLEASE PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED
 LOCATION OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION.
 13. PLEASE UPDATE ALL CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAILS TO
 CURRENT VERSIONS.
 14. COORDINATE WITH MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE
 SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING
 PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT
 HIM AT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]
 15. PROVIDE DEDICATED UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS
 FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD
 CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES,
 PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]:
  
 -WATER SERVICE STANDARD DETAILS ARE OLD REVISION ?
 PLEASE REPLACE TO NEWEST REVISION.
  
 -MULTIPLE WATER SERVICES ARE NOT STANDARD. PLEASE USE
 SINGLE METERED WATER SERVICE STANDARD DETAIL AND HAVE
 EACH METER BOX AND WATER SERVICE AT THE RESPECTIVE
 PROPERTY/UNIT IN THE 6FT UTILITY EASEMENT IN GRASS AND
 OUT OF PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC.
  
 -SITE PLAN SAID THERE ARE PLUNGE POOLS. DO THOSE HAVE
 AUTOFILL?
  
 -EXISTING FM ON PRIVATE PROPERTY NEEDS UTILITY EASEMENT
 GRANTED FOR IT.
  
 -FM HAS LABEL SAYING 16IN DIP WM. PLEASE CORRECT.
  
 -LABEL 6FT UTILITY EASEMENT ON CIVIL WATER PLAN.
  
 -WILL THE PROPERTY NEED A SEPARATE METERED WATER
 SERVICE FOR IRRIGATION?
  
 -PLEASE CONFIRM BUILDINGS WILL NOT HAVE FIRE
 SPRINKLERS.
  
 -ARE ALL 14 UNITS MULTIFAMILY/MULTIUNIT, OR ARE THERE
 14 SINGLE FAMILY UNITS? MULTIFAMILY/MULTIUNIT WATER
 SERVICES REQUIRE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES.
  
 -PLEASE LABEL PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL TYPE OF EXISTING
 WM GOING TO PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT AT FLAMINGO DR.
  
 -IS THERE A 6FT PROPOSED PRIVACY FENCE ADJACENT DOCK
 ST. OR JUST AT THE SIDES OF PROPERTY?
  
 -PLEASE VERIFY IF THE SIDEWALK IS BEING REPLACED ALL
 THE WAY FROM FLAMINGO DR. TO PARK PLACE.
  
  
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS.
 RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT
 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 [email protected]
  
  
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 02-05-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 02-05-2021 Time 12:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 02-05-2021 Time 12:27 Sent To  
Notes
2021-02-05 12:35:19THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE INTENDED
 TO PROVIDE GUIDANCE FOR BUILDING PLAN SUBMITTAL.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 7TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE
 OCCUPANCY TYPE, PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 AND WHETHER IT IS AN APARTMENT BUILDING OR FIRE RATED
 SEPARATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
 AS A TOWNHOME/SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING NOT REQUIREING
 FIRE SPRINKLER PROTECTION.
  
 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE
 LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER
 SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED.
  
 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 THE PROPOSED LOCATIONS OF THE FIRE HYDRANTS ARE
 ACCEPTABLE WITH ANY CHANGES CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH
 THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER
 THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY
 ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM,
 ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FS 61G AND
 SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PERMIT.
  
 9A) THE LOCATION OF ANY APPLICABLE DDCV AND FIRE LINE
 LOCATIONS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND
 SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL,
 THE CITY'S ENGINEERS OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND
 THE CITY'S PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE.
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
 EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
 PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
 SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE
 SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY
 DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 06-29-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By aburnett Date 06-29-2021 Time 13:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aburnett Date 06-29-2021 Time 13:22 Sent To  
Notes
2021-08-02 15:25:01FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: DOCK STREET RPD Z20120033
 AUGUST 2, 2021
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. FOR EACH LOT, PALM SUBSTITUTION CANNOT
 EXCEED 35%. LOTS 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, AND 13
 REQUIRE 2 TREES EACH IN ORDER TO NOT EXCEED 35%.
  
 2. SATISFIED. WATER AND SEWER LINES ARE NOT SHOWN WHERE
 THEY CONNECT ACROSS THE FRONT YARDS. MUST BE SHOWN TO
 ESTABLISH THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS WITH APPROVED TREES.
 ALSO, ANY DRAINAGE LINES NEED TO BE SHOWN.
  
 WATER METERS AND SEWER CLEAN OUTS ARE SHOWN, BUT THE
 ACTUAL PATH OF THE CONNECTION TO THE INTERIOR IS NOT
 SHOWN.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE IRRIGATION
 SYSTEMS FOR EACH LOT AND THE COMMON AREA PARCEL.
 INDICATE IF EACH UNIT WILL HAVE A SEPARATE SYSTEM OR IF
 IT WILL BE ONE COMMON SYSTEM.
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND SCREENING FOR ALL
 ABOVE GROUND UTILITY VALVES, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS, AND
 IRRIGATION BACKFLOWS.
 5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
 COMMON AREA. THIS AREA ALSO NEEDS TO BE DEFINED AS TO
 OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE. A LANDSCAPE BUFFER ADJACENT
 TO THE RIGHT OF WAY WOULD DEFINE THE AREA AND PROVIDE
 ADDITIONAL BUFFERING PER 94-207(C)(6).
 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS INCLUDING AREA CALCULATIONS,
 REQUIRED TREES AND SHRUB CALCULATIONS, FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 POINTS AND PERCENTAGE OF DROUGHT TOLERANT AND NATIVE
 PLANTS ADDED WERE NOT FOUND. ONLY PLANT LIST WAS FOUND
 ON SHEET LP-3.
 6. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY REQUIREMENTS
 AND POINTS FOR EACH LOT AND THE COMMON AREA PARCEL
 SEPARATELY.
 SEE COMMENT #5 ABOVE.
 7. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLANT LIST AND REQUIREMENTS FOR
 THE ROADWAY BEAUTIFICATION LANDSCAPING SEPARATELY.
 SEE COMMENT #5 ABOVE.
 8. ONGOING. ONCE THE PRODUCT IS DEFINED AS SINGLE
 FAMILY ATTACHED OR TOWNHOMES, ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE
 COMMENTS MAY BE GENERATED.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 4/14/21:
 9. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF OFF SITE TREE
 CANOPY WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE PROPERTY LINE AND
 COORDINATE LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED TREES TO AVOID
 CONFLICT. THE EASTERN LOT (15?) SHOWS CONFLICTS.
 10. SATISFIED. LOTS 11 AND 12 LANDSCAPING IS DUPLICATED
 ON SHEETS L-6 AND L-7. THIS MAY BE WHERE THE
 INFORMATION FOR THE COMMON AREA AND THE STREETSCAPE WAS
 SUPPOSED TO BE LOCATED.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 05-27-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By aburnett Date 05-27-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By aburnett Date 05-27-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-27 12:03:03FROM: ANDREW BURNETT, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1562
 PROJECT: PARK CENTRAL RPD Z20120033
 MAY 27, 2021
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1.SATISFIED. FOR EACH LOT, PALM SUBSTITUTION CANNOT
 EXCEED 35%. LOTS 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, AND 13
 REQUIRE 2 TREES EACH IN ORDER TO NOT EXCEED 35%.
  
 2.SATISFIED. WATER AND SEWER LINES ARE NOT SHOWN WHERE
 THEY CONNECT ACROSS THE FRONT YARDS. MUST BE SHOWN TO
 ESTABLISH THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS WITH APPROVED TREES.
 ALSO, ANY DRAINAGE LINES NEED TO BE SHOWN.
  
 3.SATISFIED. WATER METERS AND SEWER CLEAN OUTS ARE
 SHOWN, BUT THE ACTUAL PATH OF THE CONNECTION TO THE
 INTERIOR IS NOT SHOWN.
  
 4.SATISFIED. PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE IRRIGATION
 SYSTEMS FOR EACH LOT AND THE COMMON AREA PARCEL.
  
 5.SATISFIED. INDICATE IF EACH UNIT WILL HAVE A SEPARATE
 SYSTEM OR IF IT WILL BE ONE COMMON SYSTEM.
  
 6.SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND SCREENING FOR ALL
 ABOVE GROUND UTILITY VALVES, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS, AND
 IRRIGATION BACKFLOWS.
  
 7.SATISFIED. PROVIDE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
 COMMON AREA. THIS AREA ALSO NEEDS TO BE DEFINED AS TO
 OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE. A LANDSCAPE BUFFER ADJACENT
 TO THE RIGHT OF WAY WOULD DEFINE THE AREA AND PROVIDE
 ADDITIONAL BUFFERING PER 94-207(C)(6).
  
 8.SATISFIED. LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS INCLUDING AREA
 CALCULATIONS, REQUIRED TREES AND SHRUB CALCULATIONS,
 FLORIDA FRIENDLY POINTS AND PERCENTAGE OF DROUGHT
 TOLERANT AND NATIVE PLANTS ADDED WERE NOT FOUND. ONLY
 PLANT LIST WAS FOUND ON SHEET LP-3.
  
 9.SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY REQUIREMENTS
 AND POINTS FOR EACH LOT AND THE COMMON AREA PARCEL
 SEPARATELY. SEE COMMENT #5 ABOVE.
  
 10.SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLANT LIST AND REQUIREMENTS FOR
 THE ROADWAY BEAUTIFICATION LANDSCAPING SEPARATELY. SEE
 COMMENT #5 ABOVE.
  
 11.ONGOING. ONCE THE PRODUCT IS DEFINED AS SINGLE
 FAMILY ATTACHED OR TOWNHOMES, ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE
 COMMENTS MAY BE GENERATED.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 4/14/21:
  
 12.SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF OFF SITE TREE
 CANOPY WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE PROPERTY LINE AND
 COORDINATE LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED TREES TO AVOID
 CONFLICT. THE EASTERN LOT (15?) SHOWS CONFLICTS.
  
 13.SATISFIED. LOTS 11 AND 12 LANDSCAPING IS DUPLICATED
 ON SHEETS L-6 AND L-7. THIS MAY BE WHERE THE
 INFORMATION FOR THE COMMON AREA AND THE STREETSCAPE WAS
 SUPPOSED TO BE LOCATED.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 5/27/21:
  
 14.OPEN SPACE SHALL BE DESIGNED TO BE INTEGRATED WITH
 THE PROJECT AND SURROUNDINGS. WORK WITH ZONING AND
 LANDSCAPE STAFF TO ADDRESS.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
  
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
  
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
 ANDREW BURNETT
 561-822-1562
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 04-14-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 04-14-2021 Time 17:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 04-14-2021 Time 17:22 Sent To  
Notes
2021-04-14 17:23:09FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: DOCK STREET RPD Z20120033
 APRIL 14, 2021
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. FOR EACH LOT, PALM SUBSTITUTION CANNOT
 EXCEED 35%. LOTS 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, AND 13
 REQUIRE 2 TREES EACH IN ORDER TO NOT EXCEED 35%.
  
 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. WATER AND SEWER LINES ARE NOT
 SHOWN WHERE THEY CONNECT ACROSS THE FRONT YARDS. MUST
 BE SHOWN TO ESTABLISH THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS WITH
 APPROVED TREES. ALSO, ANY DRAINAGE LINES NEED TO BE
 SHOWN.
  
 WATER METERS AND SEWER CLEAN OUTS ARE SHOWN, BUT THE
 ACTUAL PATH OF THE CONNECTION TO THE INTERIOR IS NOT
 SHOWN.
  
 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE
 IRRIGATION SYSTEMS FOR EACH LOT AND THE COMMON AREA
 PARCEL.
 INDICATE IF EACH UNIT WILL HAVE A SEPARATE SYSTEM OR IF
 IT WILL BE ONE COMMON SYSTEM.
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND SCREENING FOR ALL
 ABOVE GROUND UTILITY VALVES, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS, AND
 IRRIGATION BACKFLOWS.
 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS
 FOR THE COMMON AREA. THIS AREA ALSO NEEDS TO BE DEFINED
 AS TO OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE. A LANDSCAPE BUFFER
 ADJACENT TO THE RIGHT OF WAY WOULD DEFINE THE AREA AND
 PROVIDE ADDITIONAL BUFFERING PER 94-207(C)(6).
 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS INCLUDING AREA CALCULATIONS,
 REQUIRED TREES AND SHRUB CALCULATIONS, FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 POINTS AND PERCENTAGE OF DROUGHT TOLERANT AND NATIVE
 PLANTS ADDED WERE NOT FOUND. ONLY PLANT LIST WAS FOUND
 ON SHEET LP-3.
 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 REQUIREMENTS AND POINTS FOR EACH LOT AND THE COMMON
 AREA PARCEL SEPARATELY.
 SEE COMMENT #5 ABOVE.
 7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLANT LIST AND
 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ROADWAY BEAUTIFICATION LANDSCAPING
 SEPARATELY.
 SEE COMMENT #5 ABOVE.
 8. ONGOING. ONCE THE PRODUCT IS DEFINED AS SINGLE
 FAMILY ATTACHED OR TOWNHOMES, ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE
 COMMENTS MAY BE GENERATED.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 4/14/21:
 9. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF OFF SITE TREE CANOPY WITHIN 10
 FEET OF THE PROPERTY LINE AND COORDINATE LOCATIONS OF
 PROPOSED TREES TO AVOID CONFLICT. THE EASTERN LOT (15?)
 SHOWS CONFLICTS.
 10. LOTS 11 AND 12 LANDSCAPING IS DUPLICATED ON SHEETS
 L-6 AND L-7. THIS MAY BE WHERE THE INFORMATION FOR THE
 COMMON AREA AND THE STREETSCAPE WAS SUPPOSED TO BE
 LOCATED.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 02-10-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 02-10-2021 Time 16:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 02-10-2021 Time 16:28 Sent To  
Notes
2021-02-10 16:28:44FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: DOCK STREET RPD Z20120033
 FEBRUARY 10, 2021
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. FOR EACH LOT, PALM SUBSTITUTION CANNOT EXCEED 35%.
 LOTS 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, AND 13 REQUIRE 2
 TREES EACH IN ORDER TO NOT EXCEED 35%.
  
 2. WATER AND SEWER LINES ARE NOT SHOWN WHERE THEY
 CONNECT ACROSS THE FRONT YARDS. MUST BE SHOWN TO
 ESTABLISH THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS WITH APPROVED TREES.
 ALSO, ANY DRAINAGE LINES NEED TO BE SHOWN.
  
 3. PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS FOR
 EACH LOT AND THE COMMON AREA PARCEL.
 4. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND SCREENING FOR ALL ABOVE GROUND
 UTILITY VALVES, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS, AND IRRIGATION
 BACKFLOWS.
 5. PROVIDE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE COMMON AREA.
 THIS AREA ALSO NEEDS TO BE DEFINED AS TO OWNERSHIP AND
 MAINTENANCE. A LANDSCAPE BUFFER ADJACENT TO THE RIGHT
 OF WAY WOULD DEFINE THE AREA AND PROVIDE ADDITIONAL
 BUFFERING PER 94-207(C)(6).
 6. PROVIDE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY REQUIREMENTS AND POINTS
 FOR EACH LOT AND THE COMMON AREA PARCEL SEPARATELY.
 7. PROVIDE A PLANT LIST AND REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
 ROADWAY BEAUTIFICATION LANDSCAPING SEPARATELY.
 8. ONCE THE PRODUCT IS DEFINED AS SINGLE FAMILY
 ATTACHED OR TOWNHOMES, ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE COMMENTS
 MAY BE GENERATED.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 2 Status P Date 04-07-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 04-07-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 04-07-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 02-08-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 02-08-2021 Time   Rev Time  
Received By llouie Date 02-08-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-02-08 12:39:22PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS ON SANITATION COLLECTION SERVICE
 INCLUDING CONTAINER(S) SIZE, TYPE, LOCATION, ETC.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status P Date 07-13-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 07-13-2021 Time 08:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 07-13-2021 Time 09:22 Sent To  
Notes
2021-07-13 09:22:32THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 6/24/2021 SUBMITTAL. THEY CAN BE ADDRESSED DURING
 ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
  
 1. PER SFWMD ERP MANUAL, THE ALTERNATE EXFILTRTION
 TRENCH EQUATION TO BE USED BECAUSE THE TRENCH WIDTH IS
 MORE THAN TWICE THE TRENCH DEPTH.
  
 2. PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE CONTROL STRUCTURE
  
 3. THE CITY MAY REQUEST STRUCTURE S-201 BE LOCATED NW
 OF THE CONTROL STRUCTURE AND PIPED TO THE EXISTING
 MANHOLE AT THE END OF FLAMINGO DRIVE.
  
 4. SITE PLAN SHOWS FLAMINGO DRIVE TO BE 17 FEET WIDE.
 ON THE CIVIL PLAN, THE ROAD SCALES 16.5 FEET. SHOW THE
 WIDENING OF THE ROAD TO 17 FEET.
  
 5. PROVIDE TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS FOR FLAMINGO DRIVE
 AND DOCK STREET. IT APPEARS BOTH STREETS WILL BE
 RECONSTRUCTED DUE TO UTILITY REPLACEMENT AND PROPOSED
 GRADES.
  
 6. COORDINATE THE PROJECT DESIGN WITH THE CITY'S
 PINEAPPLE PARK UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PLANS WHICH INCLUDES
 THE STORMWATER SYSTEM ON FLAMINGO DRIVE AND THE FORCE
 MAIN ON DOCK STREET.
  
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 02-11-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 02-11-2021 Time 11:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 02-11-2021 Time 11:45 Sent To  
Notes
2021-02-11 11:45:21THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. RELOCATE THE PARKING SPACES FROM DOCK STREET. THE
 EXISTING SWALE PROVIDES WATER QUALITY TREATMENT FOR
 STORMWATER RUNOFF THROUGH PERCOLATION AND FILTRATION.
 PAVING THE GREEN AREA INCREASES THE AMOUNT STORMWATER
 RUNOFF.
  
 2. INDICATE HOW FLAMINGO DRIVE WILL DRAIN WITH THE
 ADDITION OF THE ON STREET PARKING SPACES.
  
 3. IDENTIFY WHO WILL BE RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN THE
 DRAINAGE SYSTEM.
  
 4. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE SFWMD ERP CRITERIA. SET THE WEIR ELEVATION TO
 MAXIMIZE THE STORAGE IN THE DETENTION AREA.
  
 5, IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF THE DRIVEWAYS ON THE
 OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE STREET.
  
 6. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM THE CENTERLINE OF THE
 STREETS TO THE BUILDING FACE AND FROM REAR PROPERTY
 LINE TO BUILDING FACE.
  
 7. A PRIVATE EASEMENT WILL BE NEEDED ACROSS EACH LOT
 FOR THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
  
 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED
 WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 4. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED WITH THE
 ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 06-25-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 06-25-2021 Time 08:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-06-25 08:19:02CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
  
 REPLAT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT PRIOR TO C.O.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 04-06-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 04-06-2021 Time 13:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-04-06 13:27:171. HARD TO TELL LIMITS OF FM EASEMENT. THIS CAN BE
 DEDICATED BY PLAT.
 2. HAS FPL DECIDED HOW POWER IS TO BE PROVIDED AND ANY
 TRANSFORMER LOCATIONS?
 3. MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THE DRIVEWAY IS BEING
 WIDENED TO 24'. ALSO TO BE REFLECTED ON PLAT.
 4. PUBLIC UTILITIES IS DECIDING IF EXISTING WATER MAIN
 NEEDS TO BE REPLACED.
 5. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL NEED TO INCLUDE THE
 BIO-SWALES IN FLAMINGO DR.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 02-08-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 02-08-2021 Time 09:28 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-02-08 09:39:301. PROPERTY CORNERS MISSING.
 2. SHOW LESS AND EXCEPT PARCEL.
 3. SHOW CONVERSION TO NGVD.
 4. LABEL UE IN LOTS 1-3.
 5. REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED. MAY BE MAJOR SUBDIVISION
 FOR 14 LOTS.
 6. FORCE MAIN MISLABELED AS 16" WATER MAIN.
 7. FORCE MAIN WILL REQUIRE UTILITY EASEMENT IN LOT 1.
 8. MOVE CB S-103 INSIDE PROPERTY.
 9. SHOW PROPOSED CROSS-SECTIONS ON ALL FOUR SIDES.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 05-18-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 05-18-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 05-13-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-18 19:40:38APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:
  
 COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT WITH RESPECT
 TO SECURING THE FLAMINGO DR DEAD-END BY INSTALLING
 WARNING SIGNS AND A GATE.
  
 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL INTENSIFY VEHICULAR
 TRAFFIC ALONG THAT TRACT OF THE STREET. THUS,
 INCREASING THE RISK OF VEHICLES DRIVING STRAIGHT INTO
 THE CANAL.
  
 DEVELOPER TO PROVIDE FINAL SITE DESIGN SHOWCASING THE
 MITIGATION MEASUREMENTS ADOPTED.
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 03-30-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 03-30-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-03-30 20:18:26TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE PROPERTIES ON THE
 OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROAD (I.E. DRIVEWAYS AND CURB
 CUTS)
 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AT LEAST 3 BICYCLE PARKING RACKS,
 POSSIBLY BY THE MID AISLE ON DOCK ST
 3) SATISFIED. SHOWCASE ROADWAY WIDTHS ON THE SITE PLAN
 4) SATISFIED. SHOWCASE ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS (I.E. STOP BARS AND SIGNS) ON THE
 SITE PLAN
 5) SATISFIED. ON-STREET PARKING: PER F.S. 316.1945,
 DISTANCE BETWEEN A PARKING STALL AND THE NEAREST STOP
 BAR OR CROSSWALK SHOULD BE 30 FEET. IDENTIFY SUCH
 DISTANCE ON THE SITE PLAN, AND REVISE PARKING STALL
 LOCATIONS ACCORDINGLY
 6) SATISFIED. MILL AND REPAVE DOCK STREET BETWEEN
 PARKER AND FLAMINGO
 7) SATISFIED. PARKER ST IS INCLUDED IN THE ADOPTED
 BICYCLE MASTERPLAN. PROVIDE A 10 FEET MULTI-USE PATH ON
 PARKER AVENUE ALONG THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE. ROW
 DEDICATION WOULD BE REQUIRED.
 8) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK AT THE
 PARKER ST INTERSECTION ACROSS DOCK ST
 9) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. INSTALL ADA COMPLIANT TACTILE
 MATS AT EACH CROSSWALK CORNERS
 9A. SHOWCASE TACTILE MATS LOCATION ON SITE PLAN
 10) SATISFIED. LEFT-TURN OUTBOUND VEHICULAR MOVEMENTS
 SHOULD BE PROHIBITED AT THE EASTERN DRIVEWAY ON PARKER
 ST. PROVIDE A RAISED HALF PORK-CHOP ISLAND AND
 RIGHT-TURN ONLY SIGNAGE, SO TO ENFORCE SUCH CONDITION.
 11) REAR DRIVEWAY WIDTH SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF 24 FEET
 12) RE-ALLOCATE OUTBOUND LEFT-TURN VOLUMES FROM THE
 PARKER TO THE DOCK ST DRIVEWAY
 13) COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT WITH
 RESPECT TO SECURING THE FLAMINGO DR DEAD-END BY
 INSTALLING WARNING SIGNS AND/OR A GATE. THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT WILL INTENSIFY VEHICULAR TRAFFIC ALONG THAT
 TRACT OF THE STREET. THUS, INCREASING THE RISK OF CARS
 POTENTIALLY DRIVING STRAIGHT INTO THE CANAL.
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 02-10-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 02-10-2021 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-02-10 21:58:06TRAFFIC COMMENTS
  
 1) PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE PROPERTIES ON THE OPPOSITE
 SIDE OF THE ROAD (I.E. DRIVEWAYS AND CURB CUTS)
 2) PROVIDE AT LEAST 3 BICYCLE PARKING RACKS, POSSIBLY
 BY THE MID AISLE ON DOCK ST
 3) SHOWCASE ROADWAY WIDTHS ON THE SITE PLAN
 4) SHOWCASE ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND PAVEMENT
 MARKINGS (I.E. STOP BARS AND SIGNS) ON THE SITE PLAN
 5) ON-STREET PARKING: PER F.S. 316.1945, DISTANCE
 BETWEEN A PARKING STALL AND THE NEAREST STOP BAR OR
 CROSSWALK SHOULD BE 30 FEET. IDENTIFY SUCH DISTANCE ON
 THE SITE PLAN, AND REVISE PARKING STALL LOCATIONS
 ACCORDINGLY
 6) MILL AND REPAVE DOCK STREET BETWEEN PARKER AND
 FLAMINGO
 7) PARKER ST IS INCLUDED IN THE ADOPTED BICYCLE
 MASTERPLAN. PROVIDE A 10 FEET MULTI-USE PATH ON PARKER
 AVENUE ALONG THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE. ROW DEDICATION
 WOULD BE REQUIRED.
 8) PROVIDE A PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK AT THE PARKER ST
 INTERSECTION ACROSS DOCK ST
 9) INSTALL ADA COMPLIANT TACTILE MATS AT EACH CROSSWALK
 CORNERS
 10) LEFT-TURN OUTBOUND VEHICULAR MOVEMENTS SHOULD BE
 PROHIBITED AT THE EASTERN DRIVEWAY ON PARKER ST.
 PROVIDE A RAISED HALF PORK-CHOP ISLAND AND RIGHT-TURN
 ONLY SIGNAGE, SO TO ENFORCE SUCH CONDITION.
  
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 08-06-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 08-06-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 08-06-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-08-06 16:00:45SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
  
 1.) A RE-PLAT OFF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY SHALL BE
 EXECUTED AND RECORDED PRIORR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE
 FIRST CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.).
  
 2.) TO MITIGATE THE ADDITIONAL VEHICULAR TRAFFIC AND
 INCREASED RISK OF VEHICLES DRIVING INTO THE ABUTTING
 CANAL ON FLAMINGO DRIVE, THE DEVELOPER, SUCESSORS OR
 ASSIGNS SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
 ON SECURING THE FLAMINGO DRIVE DEAD-END BY INSTALLING
 WARNING SIGNS AND A GATE PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE
 FIRST C.O.
  
 3.) THE DEVELOPER, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
  
 4.) THE DEVELOPER, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD
 RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THE
 MAINTENANCE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION SHALL BE EXECUTED BY A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE
 AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE
 FIRST C.O.
  
 5.) PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY
 TREES/PALMS ON THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT
 SHALL BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 6.) ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, INCLUDING NEW
 CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR IMPROVEMENT OF AN
 EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS
 ARE EQUAL OR GREATER THAN $750,000.00 IS SUBJECT TO THE
 ART IN PUBLIC PLACES REQUIREMENTS OFF CHAPTER 78,
 ARTICLE V, OF THE CITY'S CODE OF ORDINANCES.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 05-26-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 05-26-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 05-26-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-26 15:03:51GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) THE DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED COMMON OPEN SPACE SEEMS
 TO BE DISCONNECTED FROM THE PROJECT AND COULD BE
 DESIGNED TO INTEGRATE BETTER WITH THE PROJECT AND
 SURROUNDING AREA. [2/10/2021 AND 4/6/2021 REPEAT
 COMMENT (COMBINE GENERAL COMMENT #2 AND #3): IT WAS
 DISCUSSED AT THE 3/30/20 CONFERENCE CALL BETWEEN STAFF
 AND THE APPLICANT THAT THE OPEN SPACE WOULD BE IMPROVED
 TO BE MORE FUNCTIONAL AND INTEGRATED (SIMILAR TO THE
 PROJECTS IN THE DMP AREA). IT IS IN STAFF?S OPINION
 THAT THE SPACE HAS NOT BEEN IMPROVED, AND THE BICYCLE
 RACK STILL SEEMS OUT OF PLACE IN A LOCATION THAT WILL
 NOT MAXIMIZE USE/VISIBILITY. STAFF IS ENCOURAGING THE
 USE OF BENCHES, PEDESTRIAN TRAILS/PATHWAYS, PEDESTRIAN
 ACCESS FROM THE SIDEWALK AND WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT
 THAT WOULD INTEGRATE THE SPACE WITH THE OVERALL
 DEVELOPMENT AND ALSO PROVIDE BENEFITS WITHIN THE
 DEVELOPMENT AND TO THE SURROUNDING AREA. DEPENDING ON
 THE DESIGN OF THE INTEGRATED OPEN SPACE, IT MAY BE USED
 TO EXPLAIN THE ?TRADE-OFFS? TO THE CITY/COMMUNITY,
 WHICH IS A CRITICAL COMPONENT IN THE REQUEST FOR THE
 RPD.]
  
 2.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING OUTSTANDING COMMENTS
 IN THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT (LAST REVISED
 5/11/2021): A) CHECK NUMBER OF WAIVERS REQUESTED. EIGHT
 WAIVERS REQUESTED IN THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT STILL
 SEEMS TO BE INACCURATE. B) EXPLAIN AND CLARIFY THE 10
 FT. WIDE MULTI-USE PATHWAY ON PARKER AVENUE AS
 MENTIONED IN THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. A
 MULTI-PURPOSE PATHWAY IS A SINGLE PATHWAY THAT CAN
 ACCOMMODATE MULTIPLE ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE ONE PATHWAY
 ON THE SAME SURFACE (WALK, BIKE, STROLLERS, ROLLER
 BLADING, ETC.). THE 10 FT. WIDE MULTI-PURPOSE PATHWAY
 DOES NOT SEEM TO EXIST. ALSO, THE RIGHT-OF-WAY
 DEDICATION THAT IS NEEDED FOR A BICYCLE LANE IS NOT THE
 RESULT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT (IT IS PART OF THE
 CITY'S VISION PER THE BICYCLE MASTER PLAN) AND CANNOT
 BE CLAIMED AS AN IMPROVEMENT/BENEFIT TO THE COMMUNITY
 AS A RESULT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AS IMPLIED IN
 THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. C) DISCREPANCY IN THE
 JUSTIFICATION LETTER (4 FT. HIGH PVC FENCE) VS.
 SITE/ARCHITECTURAL PLANS (4 FT. HIGH ALUMINUM PICKET
 FENCE. ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. D) REFERENCE MADE TO
 THE COMMON OPEN SPACE AND THE BENEFITS IT WILL PROVIDE
 TO THE PUBLIC SPHERE IS NOT EVIDENT IN THE DESIGN. THE
 DESIGN OF THE COMMON OPEN SPACE IS CRITICAL TO THE
 REQUEST OF THE RPD AND MUST BE INTEGRATED (NOT
 DISCONNECTED) WITH THE DEVELOPMENT AND SURROUNDING
 AREA. E) IN RESPONSES TO ZLDR S.94-32, THE NUMBERS
 PROVIDED IN THE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
 SECTION ARE NOT ALL ACCURATE. PLEASE REFER TO THE SITE
 PLAN COMMENTS FOR SPECIFIC INACCURACIES IN THE NUMBERS.
 F) ADDRESS THE INACCURACIES WITH THE NUMBERS IN THE
 WAIVER CHART PROVIDED IN THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT
 (SEE SITE PLAN COMMENTS). G) WAIVER 8 WILL BE CHANGED
 AS DISCUSSED IN THE 5/26/21 CONFERENCE CALL BETWEEN
 STAFF AND THE APPLICANT.
  
  
 SITE PLAN:
  
 1.) AS DISCUSSED IN THE 5/26/2021 CONFERENCE CALL
 BETWEEN STAFF AND THE APPLICANT, THE 20 FT. WIDE ACCESS
 EASEMENT WILL BE MAINTAINED, BUT THE APPLICANT WILL
 SEEK A WAIVER TO THE WIDTH OF THE ACCESS DRIVE.
  
 2.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE SITE DATA
 TABULAR: THE PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT NOTED IN THE
 TABLE IS STILL INCONSISTENT WITH THE HEIGHT PROVIDED IN
 THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. [4/6/2021 REPEAT COMMENT:
 NOT SATISFIED. BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE
 ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS, THE PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT IS
 33 FT., AND THIS INCLUDES THE 10% HEIGHT EXCEPTION.]
  
 3.) THE FOLLOWING OUTSTANDING COMMENTS SHALL BE
 ADDRESSED IN THE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS
 TABLE: A) INFORMATION PROVIDED FOR PROPOSED LOT WIDTH,
 FRONT SETBACK AND SIDE CORNER SETBACK ARE INCORRECT, AS
 THEY DO NOT REFLECT THE SHORTEST DIMENSION PROVIDED. B)
 FLOATING WAIVER BOXES BELOW THE TABLE SHOULD BE REMOVED
 TO CLEAN UP THE SITE PLAN SHEET. [RESPONSE TO 4/6/21
 STAFF COMMENT: ALTHOUGH THE GENERAL REQUESTED
 INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED, SEVERAL NUMBERS ARE
 STILL INACCURATE AND MUST BE CORRECTED FOR ACCURACY.
 ALSO, GENERAL CLEAN UP OF THE TABLE NEEDED TO MAKE
 TABLES EASIER TO UNDERSTAND. PLEASE CONTACT STAFF TO
 ASSIST WITH THE CLEAN UP OF THE TABLE.]
  
 4.) THE COMMON OPEN SPACE AREA SHOULD BE DESIGNED TO BE
 MORE FUNCTIONAL AND INTEGRATED WITH THE PROJECT AND
 SURROUNDINGS. THE OPEN SPACE SEEMS TO BE DISCONNECTED
 IN THE LATEST PLANS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT. [4/6/2021
 REPEAT COMMMENT: STAFF DOES NOT AGREE WITH THE
 APPLICANT'S 5/11/2021 (RECEIVED 5/13/2021) COMMENT.
 STAFF BELIEVES THAT THE OPEN SPACE AERA SHOULD BE
 DESIGNED TO BE MORE FUNCTIONAL AND INTEGRATED WITH THE
 PROJECT AND THE SURROUNDING COMMUNITY. THE BICYCLE RACK
 SHOULD BE STRATEGICALLY PLACED IN THE INTEGRATED DESIGN
 OF THE OPEN SPACE.]
  
 5.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE WAIVER CHART:
 A) PROVIDED MINIMUM LOT WIDTH IN THE SF14 ZONING
 DISTRICT (W2) IS THE PROPOSED BUILDING AREA AND NOT THE
 ACTUAL LOT AREA. B) THE PROVIDED FRONT SETBACK IS NOT
 11 FT. MEASUREMENTS CANNOT BE TAKEN FOR A PORTION OF
 THE STEPS (SETBACK IS ~ 6FT.) C) THE PROVIDED CORNER
 SIDE SETBACK IS NOT CORRECT. THE SIDE CORNER SETBACK
 FOR LOT 14 SEEMS TO BE A LOT CLOSER THAN 8 FT. D) NOT
 NECESSARY TO PROVIDE "STEPS WHICH ARE 3 FT. ABOVE
 GRADE" AS IT IS CLEAR IN THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS THAT
 THE STEPS EXCEED 3 FT. IN HEIGHT. E) AS DISCUSSED IN
 THE 5/26/2021 CONFERENCE CALL BETWEEN STAFF AND THE
 APPLICANT WAIVER #8 WILL CHANGE.
  
 6.) THE LIGHT POLE FIXTURE ALONG FLAMINGO DRIVE SHALL
 BE SETBACK A MINIMUM OF 12.5 FT. THE 5 FT. CORNER SIDE
 SETBACK STAFF HAD PROVIDED IN THE COMMENTS FROM
 4/6/2021 WAS INCORRECT AND MUST BE CORRECTED FOR
 CONSISTENCY WITH ZLDR S.94-74(A)(3)(B.) AND
 S.94-304(B)(2).
  
  
 ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) THE FRONT SETBACK HAS BEEN INCORRECTLY MEASURED (IT
 IS LESS THAN 11 FT. AS NOTED IN PLANS). THE FRONT
 SETBACK SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE STAIRS
 TO THE PROPERTY LINE.
  
 2.) PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSION FOR THE JULIETTE BALCONY
 ON SHEET A1.1.
  
  
 SITE LIGHTING (PHOTOMETRICS):
  
 1.) THE LIGHT POLE FIXTURE ALONG FLAMINGO DRIVE SHALL
 BE SETBACK A MINIMUM OF 12.5 FT. FROM THE PROPERTY
 LINE. THE 5 FT. SETBACK NOTED IN STAFF'S PREVIOUS
 COMMENT WAS AN ERROR. [ZLDR S.94-74(A)(3) AND
 S.94-304(B)(2)]
  
 2.) SETBACK FOR THE LIGHT POLE FIXTURE CLOSEST TO
 PARKER AVENUE SEEMS TO BE INCORRECTLY ILLUSTRATED ON
 SHEET E-1.2. PLEASE CORRECT FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE
 ZLDRS.
  
  
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:
  
 * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX
 (6) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 11 INCHES X
 17 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND
 DOCUMENTS.
  
 * ANY CHANGES TO THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 04-06-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 04-06-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 04-06-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-04-06 16:14:40*** THE COMMENTS BELOW APPLY TO THE RESUBMITTAL PACKAGE
 RECEIVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ?
 PLANNING DIVISION ON 03/10/2021 ***
  
 GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) AS DISCUSSED IN THE 3/30/2021 CONFERENCE CALL
 BETWEEN STAFF AND THE APPLICANT, A SUPPORT LETTER FOR
 THE PROPOSED PROJECT FROM THE FLAMINGO PARK
 NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION IS REQUIRED. THE APPLICANT IS
 ALSO ENCOURAGED TO OBTAIN A SUPPORT LETTER FROM THE
 GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION. [2/10/2021
 MODIFIED COMMENT: A SUPPORT LETTER FROM THE PINEAPPLE
 PARK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION WAS SUBMITTED WITH THE
 RESUBMITTAL. AS ADVISED BY STAFF, IT WOULD ALSO BE
 ADVANTAGEOUS TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL SUPPORT LETTERS FROM
 OTHER SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS ON THE PROJECT.]
  
 2.) PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-207 OF THE ZONING AND LAND
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS) THE INTENT OF A PLANNED
 DEVELOPMENT IS TO ENCOURAGE THROUGH INCENTIVES, THE USE
 OF INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES
 TO CREATE A MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT
 IN THE CITY. THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT DOES NOT
 EXPLAIN HOW THIS IS BEING ACHIEVED IN THE SITE DESIGN
 FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (I.E. SEMI-PRIVATE
 PARK SPACE, ETC.). [2/10/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: THE
 JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT STILL DOES NOT EXPLAIN WHAT THE
 BENEFIT OF THE PROPOSED PD ARE TO THE CITY/SURROUNDING
 COMMUNITY. THE APPLICANT MUST BE ABLE TO DESCRIBE IN
 TEXT AND IN THE PLANS WHAT THE "TRADE-OFFS" ARE TO THE
 CITY/COMMUNITY FOR THE SUPPORT OF THE WAIVERS
 REQUESTED. THIS WAS A DISCUSSION ITEM AT THE 3/30/2021
 CONFERENCE CALL BETWEEN STAFF AND THE APPLICANT.]
  
 3.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING OUTSTANDING COMMENTS
 IN THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT: A) ON SHEET 5/15, THE
 "MINIMUM LOT AREA" REQUIRED STILL STATES 5 ACRES.
 PLEASE CORRECT TO A MINIMUM OF 10 ACRES REQUIRED FOR
 CONSISTENCY WITH THE ZLDRS. B) ALTHOUGH THE CONSTRAINTS
 OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT HAD BEEN EXPLAINED, WHICH
 NECESSITATES THE WAIVERS, THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT
 STILL DOES NOT EXPLAIN THE "TRADE-OFFS" TO THE
 CITY/COMMUNITY AND MITIGATION MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE)
 TO SUPPORT THE WAIVER REQUESTS.
  
 [2/10/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: AS DISCUSSED IN THE
 3/31/2021 CONFERENCE CALL BETWEEN STAFF AND THE
 APPLICANT, IT IS CRITICAL TO EXPLAIN THE "TRADE-OFFS"
 OF THE PROJECT FOR THE SUPPORT OF THE WAIVER REQUESTS
 (I.E. EXAMPLES: INCORPORATION OF A SEMI-PUBLIC PARK
 SPACE, URBAN DESIGN AND WALKABILIT, ADDITIONAL
 LANDSCAPING THAT GOES ABOVE AND BEYOND THE REQUIREMENTS
 OF THE ZLDRS AND PURPOSE IT SERVES, ETC. PLEASE NOTE
 THAT THE WAIVERS FOR A PD CANNOT BE SUPPORTED SOLELY
 FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCIAL/MARKET DRIVEN FACTORS.
 CLARIFICATION WAS ALSO PROVIDED ON THE ISSUE OF THE
 DEFINITION OF BUILDING TYPOLOGY.]
  
 4.) ALL UTILITIES, INCLUDING TELEPHONE, CABLE
 TELEVISION, AND ELECTRICAL SERVICE SYSTEM, SHALL BE
 INSTALLED UNDERGROUND. [2/10/2021 REPEAT COMMENT:
 ALTHOUGH THE APPLICANT HAS ACKNOWLEDGED THE NOTE, STAFF
 IS REQUESTING THAT THE NOTE BE PROVIDED IN THE SITE
 PLAN FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR A PD.]
  
 5.) PROVIDE LETTERS FROM THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC UTILITIES
 CONFIRMING THAT THE PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO
 THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE
 PROVISION OF THEIR SERVICES: COMCAST AND FPU.
 [2/10/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: LETTERS FROM COMCAST AND FPU
 NOT PROVIDED WITH THE 3/10/2021 RESUBMITTAL.]
  
  
 SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
  
 1.) AS DISCUSSED IN THE 3/30/2021 CONFERENCE CALL
 BETWEEN STAFF AND THE APPLICANT, THE ISSUES AND
 CONCERNS WITH THE 20 FT. WIDE ACCESS DRIVE AT THE REAR
 OF THE DEVELOPMENT HAS BEEN RESOLVED. THE APPLICANT
 WILL PROVIDE A 24 FT. WIDE ACCESS DRIVE.
  
 2.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE SITE DATA
 TABULAR: A) INFORMATION (I.E. SQ. FT. TO BE DEDICATED)
 FOR THE 5 FT. WIDE DEDICATION ALONG PARKER AVENUE SHALL
 BE INCLUDED IN THE TABLE. ALSO, PLEASE PROVIDE MORE
 INFORMATION ON THE DEDICATION IN THE JUSTIFICATION
 STATEMENT (I.E. WHO IS REQUESTING THE ROW DEDICATION).
 B) FAR AND DENSITY CALCULATIONS SHALL BE CALCULATED
 USING THE NET SITE AREA (NOT THE GROSS SITE AREA).
 PLEASE CORRECT. C) THE PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT NOTED
 IN THE TABLE IS STILL INCONSISTENT WITH THE HEIGHT
 PROVIDED IN THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS.
  
 3.) BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE 3/31/2021
 CONFERENCE CALL BETWEEN STAFF AND THE APPLICANT, AND
 THE COMMENTS PROVIDED IN THIS REVIEW, PLEASE ADDRESS
 THE FOLLOWING IN THE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS:
 PROPOSED LOT WIDTH, LOT FRONTAGE, REQUIRED LOT DEPTH,
 FAR CALCULATIONS, AND REQUIRED AND PROPOSED BUILDING
 SETBACKS SHALL BE CORRECTED FOR ACCURACY WITH THE ZLDRS
 AND REQUESTED WAIVERS.
  
 4.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING OUTSTANDING
 INCONSISTENCIES IN THE WAIVER CHART. THERE ARE SOME
 WAIVERS THAT ARE DUPLICATED AND CONFUSED WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDRS AND CAN BE PRESENTED IN A
 MORE EFFICIENT MANNER: A) THE WAIVER TO THE REQUIRED
 LOT AREA IN THE SF14 ZONING DISTRICT HAS NOT BEEN
 INCLUDED IN THE WAIVER CHART AS NOTED IN THE RESPONSES
 TO STAFF'S COMMENTS. PER ZLDR S. 94-74(A)(1)(A.), THE
 REQUIRED MINIMUM LOT AREA IS 6,000 SQ. FT. THE PROPOSED
 FEE-SIMPLE LOTS DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT FOR
 LOT SIZE. B) THE PROJECT IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE
 MINIMUM LOT WIDTH STANDARD OF THE SF14 ZONING DISTRICT.
 AS NOTED IN THE SITE PLAN, THE PROPOSED LOT WIDTH SEEMS
 TO BE A MINIMUM OF 21.16 FT. AND DOES NOT MEET THE
 MINIMUM REQUIRED 60 FT. LOT WIDTH. C) PER ZLDR
 S.94-207(C)(4), THE REQUIRED BUILDING SETBACKS IN AN
 RPD IS 20 FT. FROM ANY OUTERMOST PERIMETER PROPERTY
 LINE OF THE PROPOSED RPD BOUNDARIES. THIS IMPACTS THE
 FRONT SETBACK (FOR LOTS 1-14) AND THE CORNER SIDE
 SETBACK (UNITS 1 AND 14). D) PLEASE EXPLAIN W4 AND W5
 IN THE WAIVER CHART. STEPS SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE
 REQUIRED SETBACKS FOR THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE SINCE THE
 STEPS ARE GREATER THAN 3 FT. IN HEIGHT. E) THE PROVIDED
 FRONT SETBACK IS NOT 15 FT. IT IS LESS THAN THAT SINCE
 THE ENTRANCE STEPS FOR EACH UNIT/LOT IS GREATER THAN 3
 FT. ABOVE GRADE AND MUST MEET THE BUILDING SETBACK OF
 THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE PER S. 94-207(C)(4). F) THE SIDE
 CORNER SETBACK IS NOT 14 FT. AS NOTED IN THE SITE PLAN.
 THE ENTRANCE STEPS TO UNIT 1 IS GREATER THAN 3 FT.
 ABOVE GRADE AND MUST MEET THE REQUIRED 20 FT. SIDE
 CORNER SETBACK PER THE ZLDRS. ACCORDING TO THE
 ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS, THE SETBACK OF THE PROPOSED
 ENTRANCE STEPS TO UNIT 1 IS 8 FT. FROM THE SIDE CORNER
 PROPERTY LINE. A WAIVER SHALL BE REQUESTED. IT IS ALSO
 IMPORTANT TO DIMENSION OUT THE SETBACK FROM THE STEPS
 TO THE SIDE PROPERTY LINE IN THE SITE PLAN.
  
 5.) THE BUILDING DISTANCE SEPARATION BETWEEN THE TWO
 GROUPINGS OF UNITS IS NOT MEASURED CORRECTLY. SINCE THE
 STEPS ARE GREATER THAN 3 FT. IN HEIGHT, THE SETBACK
 DISTANCE TO THE SIDE PROPERTY LINE AND BETWEEN UNITS
 SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE STEPS. [2/10/2021 REPEAT
 COMMENT: SETBACK DISTANCE STILL NOT MEASURED
 CORRECTLY.]
  
 6.) THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED BICYCLE RACK IN THE
 OPEN SPACE AREA BY THE CANAL IS NOT APPROPRIATE. UNLESS
 THERE ARE OTHER COMMUNITY AMENITIES THAT ARE PROPOSED
 WITHIN THE SPACE THAT WOULD NECESSITATE THE USE FOR A
 RACK, STAFF WOULD RECOMMEND REMOVING THE RACK FROM THE
 IDENTIFIED LOCATION.
  
 7.) PLEASE LABEL THE 4 FT. HIGH ALUMINUM PRIVACY FENCE
 ALONG DOCK STREET FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
 8.) WHAT IS THE SETBACK DISTANCE FROM THE PROPOSED
 STEPS TO THE SIDE PROPERTY LINES FOR UNITS 7 AND 8?
 PLEASE NOTE THAT STEPS, OPEN UNCOVERED PORCHES OR
 STOOPS AND OPEN TERRACES WHICH ARE 3 FT. ABOVE GRADE
 SHALL MEET THE MINIMUM SETBACK FOR THE PRINCIPAL
 STRUCTURE OF THE ZONING DISTRICT. [2/10/2021
 REPEAT/MODIFIED COMMENT: ACCORDING TO THE ARCHITECTURAL
 DRAWINGS, THE HEIGHT OF THE STEPS IS ~ 6 FT.; NO
 SETBACK DIMENSIONS PROVIDED.
  
 9) LIGHT POLE FIXTURES SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE SITE
 PLAN. INCLUDE SETBACK DIMENSIONS FROM THE POLE FIXTURES
 TO THE PROPERTY LINE(S). PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PROPOSED
 POLE FIXTURES ALONG FLAMINGO DRIVE (AS NOTED IN THE
 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN) SHALL BE SETBACK A MINIMUM OF 5 FT.
 FROM THE SIDE PROPERTY LINE. [ZLDR S.94-304(B)]
  
  
 ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) IT IS STAFF'S UNDERSTANDING FROM THE 3/31/2021
 CONFERENCE CALL BETWEEN STAFF AND THE APPLICANT, THAT
 THE ARCHITECT WILL ADDRESS THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT (I.E. ADD ELEMENTS THAT WILL BLEND
 HE ARCHITECTURAL STYLE WITH THE SURROUNDING
 NEIGHBORHOODS. OR PROVIDE SUPPORT LETTERS FROM ADJACENT
 NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS STATING THAT THERE ARE NO
 ISSUES WITH THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT.)
  
 2.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE MATERIALS
 LEGEND (SHEETS A2.0 AND A2.1): A) 002 AND 010 NOT
 IDENTIFIED/LOCATED IN THE ELEVATIONS. B) THE NOTE FOR
 THE ALUMINUM PICKET FENCE (012) STATES THAT THE HEIGHT
 OF THE FENCE WILL BE 5 FT. IN HEIGHT; HOWEVER, THE
 RESPONSE TO STAFF'S COMMENTS FOR THE SITE PLAN AND THE
 REVISED SITE PLAN DOCUMENT SEEMS TO SHOW THAT THE
 HEIGHT OF THE ALUMINUM PICKET FENCE WILL BE 4 FT.
 PLEASE ADDRESS THIS DISCREPANCY. ALSO, PLEASE PROVIDE
 THE SETBACK LOCATION FROM THE FENCE TO THE PROPERTY
 LINE(S) TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE HEIGHT AND SETBACK
 REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDRS. C) 018 CANNOT BE IDENTIFIED
 IN THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS. D) 020 IS SHOWN IN THE
 ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS; HOWEVER, IT IS NOT IDENTIFIED
 IN THE MATERIALS LEGEND.
  
 3.) SHOW SETBACK DISTANCE FROM THE POOL EQUIPMENT OF
 EACH UNIT TO THE PROPERTY LINE(S). ALL MECHANICAL
 EQUIPMENT MAY NOT PROJECT MORE THAN 4 FT. INTO A
 REQUIRED SETBACK. [ZLDR S.94-305(A)(4)]
  
 4.) SHOW HEIGHT OF THE LADDER ALONG THE SIDE OF THE
 BUILDING FOR ROOF ACCESS. THE HEIGHT OF THE LADDER WILL
 BE SUBJECT TO THE HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS OF ZLDR S.94-306.
  
 5.) WILL THE ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (I.E. A/C
 COMPRESSOR UNITS) BE VISIBLE AT EYE LEVEL FROM THE
 STREET? IF SO, SCREENING FOR THE ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT
 SHALL BE PROVIDED (I.E. PARAPET, DECORATIVE SCREEN
 WALL, ETC.). ALSO NOTE THAT THE ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT IS
 SUBJECT TO THE HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS IN ZLDR S.94-306.
 PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE.
  
 6.) THE HIGHEST POINT OF THE BUILDING PARAPET SEEMS TO
 BE 27'-4" (VS. 28'-6" AS NOTED IN THE SITE PLAN).
 PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
 7.) SINCE THE HEIGHT THE ENTRANCE STAIRS TO EACH UNIT
 IS GREATER THAN 3 FT. IT SHALL BE REQUIRED TO MEET THE
 SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OF THE PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE. IF
 THIS CANNOT BE MET, WAIVERS FOR THE SETBACKS WILL BE
 REQUIRED. [ZLDR S.94-305(A)(7)]
  
 8.) PER THE DEFINITION PROVIDED IN THE ZLDRS (ARTICLE
 XIX), THE BUILDING HEIGHT IS THE VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM
 THE MEAN GRADE OF THE LOT AT THE FRONTAGE OF THE
 BUILDING TO THE HIGHEST POINT OF THE TOP OF THE
 STRUCTURE. THE HEIGHT SEEMS TO BE TAKEN FROM THE FINISH
 FLOOR ELEVATION, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE
 DEFINITION PER THE ZLDRS. [NOTE: THIS COMMENT WAS
 MISSED IN THE ORIGINAL REVIEW OF THE SUBMITTAL.]
  
  
 SITE LIGHTING (PHOTOMETRICS):
  
 1.) ANY POLE FIXTURES WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE
 PROJECT SITE SHALL BE ILLUSTRATED IN ALL PLANS (I.E.
 SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN, ETC.) WITH SETBACK
 DIMENSIONS FROM THE PROPERTY LINE(S) TO ENSURE THAT
 THERE IS NO CONFLICT WITH EXISTING/PROPOSED SITE
 IMPROVEMENTS AND DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE
 SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING DISTRICT. [2/10/2021
 MODIFIED/REPEAT COMMENT: NOT ADDRESSED. POLE FIXTURES
 ILLUSTRATED IN THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN ARE NOT ILLUSTRATED
 AND DIMENSIONED OUT IN THE SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN,
 CIVIL PLANS, ETC. FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS
 OF THE ZLDRS.]
  
  
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:
  
 * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX
 (6) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 INCHES X
 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 INCHES, AND
 AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND DOCUMENTS.
  
 * CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTAL PLANS MAY RESULT IN
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE
 ($600.00).
  
 * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE
 QUESTIONS.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 02-10-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 02-10-2021 Time   Rev Time  
Received By llouie Date 02-10-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-02-10 10:52:17GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) IT IS ADVISED THAT THE APPLICANT CONTACT THE
 SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD GROUPS FOR PUBLIC OUTREACH ON
 THE PROJECT.
  
 2.) PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-207 OF THE ZONING AND LAND
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS) THE INTENT OF A PLANNED
 DEVELOPMENT IS TO ENCOURAGE THROUGH INCENTIVES, THE USE
 OF INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES
 TO CREATE MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT IN
 THE CITY. THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT DOES NOT EXPLAIN
 HOW THIS IS BEING ACHIEVED IN THE SITE DESIGN FOR THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (I.E. SEMI-PRIVATE PARK
 SPACE, ETC.).
  
 3.) AS REQUIRED BY THE ZLDRS FOR A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT,
 PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IN THE JUSTIFICATION
 STATEMENT ON COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF
 THE ZLDRS: S.94-35(C) (SITE DESIGN QUALITATIVE
 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS), S.94-33 (COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
 CONSISTENCY), ARTICLE XII (NATURAL RESOURCE
 PROTECTION), AND ARTICLE XVII (FLOOD PREVENTION AND
 CONTROL). [ZLDR S.94-207(B)(1)]
  
 4.) THE MINIMUM LAND AREA FOR AN RPD IS 10 ACRES. A
 WAIVER IS BEING REQUESTED TO THE MINIMUM LAND AREA;
 HOWEVER, THE APPLICANT HAS NOT PROVIDED AN EXPLANATION
 HOW THE CRITERIA IN ZLDR S.94-207(C)(2) HAS BEEN
 SATISFIED TO SUPPORT THE WAIVER FOR THE REDUCED LAND
 AREA.
  
 5.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE JUSTIFICATION
 STATEMENT: A) PLEASE CLARIFY/DEFINE "ATTACHED
 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS." BASED ON STAFF'S
 REVIEW OF THE PLANS, THE PRODUCT LOOKS TO BE A
 TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT. B) MINOR SUBDIVISION REQUEST IS
 INCONSISTENT WITH THE DESIGN OF THE RESIDENTIAL
 PROJECT. C) ALL WAIVER REQUESTS MUST BE SUPPORTED BY
 EXPLAINING THE BENEFITS OF THE WAIVER TO THE
 PROJECT/COMMUNITY, HARDSHIP OF MEETING THE ZLDRS,
 MITIGATION MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE), ETC. THE
 JUSTIFICATION PROVIDED FOR THE WAIVERS IS INSUFFICIENT.
 D) IN ADDITION TO THE WAIVER REQUESTS, THE APPLICANT
 SHOULD ESTABLISH SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (I.E.
 MINIMUM LOT SIZE STANDARDS, BUILDING SETBACKS, ETC.)
 SPECIFICALLY FOR THE PROPOSED PRODUCT IN THE RPD
 PROJECT.
  
 6.) ALL LAND INCLUDED FOR PURPOSE OF DEVELOPMENT WITHIN
 A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT SHALL BE OWNED OR UNDER
 THE CONTROL OF THE PETITIONER FOR SUCH ZONING
 DESIGNATION, WHETHER THAT PETITIONER BE AN INDIVIDUAL,
 PARTNERSHIP OR A CORPORATION, OR A GROUP OF
 INDIVIDUALS, PARTNERSHIPS OR CORPORATIONS. THE
 APPLICANT SHALL PRESENT FIRM EVIDENCE OF THE UNIFIED
 CONTROL OF THE ENTIRE AREA. [ZLDR S.94-207(B)(8)]
  
 7.) ALL UTILITIES, INCLUDING TELEPHONE, CABLE
 TELEVISION, AND ELECTRICAL SERVICE SYSTEMS, SHALL BE
 INSTALLED UNDERGROUND. [ZLDR S.94-207(B)(5)]
  
 8.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE PUBLIC
 UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR
 WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE
 COLLECTION SERVICES. PLEASE CONTACT THE ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT (561) 494-1040.
  
 9.) PROVIDE LETTERS FROM THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC UTILITIES
 CONFIRMING THAT THE PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO
 THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE
 PROVISION OF THEIR SERVICES: COMCAST AND FPU.
  
 10.) A MAJOR SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FOR 14 FEE-SIMPLE
 LOTS WAS SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION ON 2/8/2021
 FOR REVIEW. THE SUBDIVISION APPLICATION WILL BE
 REVIEWED SEPARATELY AND WILL BE SCHEDULED FOR THE NEXT
 AVAILABLE PPRC MEETING.
  
 11.) ALL PLANS SHALL SHALL MATCH. REVIEW OF PLANS (I.E.
 CIVIL PLANS, LANDSCAPE AND SITE PLAN) SHOWS
 DISCREPANCIES IN LOT LINE CONFIGURATION FOR THE
 PROJECT.
  
 12.) THE COMMON ACCESS ROAD SEEMS TO GO ACROSS
 INDIVIDAUL LOT LINES. HOW WILL THIS BE ADDRESSED IN
 TERMS OF ACCESS AND MAINTENANCE?
  
  
 SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
  
 1.) THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE
 PLAN. [ZLDR S.207(B)(9)]
  
 2.) CHECK INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE WAIVER TABLE.
 SOME OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE TABLE IS
 INACCURATE (I.E. REQUIRED SETBACKS, ETC.).
  
 3.) RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS SHALL BE LOCATED AT LEAST 20
 FT. FROM ANY OUTERMOST PERIMETER PROPERTY LINE OF THE
 RPD. A WAIVER SHALL BE REQUIRED IF THIS CANNOT BE MET.
 [ZLDR S.94-207(C)(4)]
  
 4.) BASED ON STAFF'S REVIEW OF THE PLANS, THE FOLLOWING
 WAIVERS TO ZLDR S.94-74 ARE NECESSARY, AS THE PROPOSAL
 DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM DEVELOPMENT
 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SF14 ZONING DISTRICT: A) LOT AREA
 B) LOT WIDTH C) FRONT SETBACK D) CORNER SETBACK E)
 INTERIOR SIDE.
  
 5.) SHOW SETBACK DISTANCE FOR THE BUILDINGS ON LOTS 8
 AND 9 TO THE PROPERTY LINE.
  
 6.) WHAT IS THE BUILDING DISTANCE SEPARATION BETWEEN
 THE TWO GROUPINGS OF UNITS? PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSION IN
 THE PLAN.
  
 7.) STRUCTURES ARE LOCATED WITHIN THE 6 FT. WIDE
 UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG DOCK STREET. PROVIDE THE
 NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION/AGREEMENTS THAT WILL ENSURE
 THAT ALL UTILITY PROVIDERS WILL NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE
 FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF STRUCTURES WITHIN THE EASEMENT.
  
 8.) SHOW SETBACK DISTANCE OF THE PROPOSED 6 FT. HIGH
 PRIVACY FENCE. THE PRIVACY FENCE CANNOT EXCEED 4 FT. IN
 HEIGHT WITHIN THE REQUIRED FRONT SETBACK (25 FT. FROM
 PROPERTY LINE ALONG DOCK STREET). [ZLDR S.34-302(B)]
  
 9.) WHAT IS THE MATERIAL OF THE PROPOSED PRIVACY FENCE?
 PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL.
  
 10.) SHOW LOCATION OF THE A/C COMPRESSOR UNITS. ALL
 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MAY NOT PROJECT MORE THAN 4 FT.
 INTO A SETBACK. [ZLDR S.94-305(B.)(4)]
  
 11.) STEPS, OPEN UNCOVERED PORCHES OR STOOPS AND OPEN
 TERRACES WHICH ARE 3 FT. ABOVE GRADE SHALL MEET MINIMUM
 SETBACK FOR THE PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE OF THE OF THE
 ZONING DISTRICT. STEPS WHICH ARE LESS THAN 3 FT. ABOVE
 GRADE MAY ENCROACH NO CLOSER THAN 2 FT. FROM THE
 PROPERTY LINE. ACCORDING TO THE PLANS, THE FRONT/SIDE
 STEPS OF THE PROJECT SEEM TO BE GREATER THAN 3 FT.
 ABOVE GRADE. ALSO SHOW SETBACK DIMENSIONS (WHERE
 APPLIABLE). [ZLDR S.94-305(B.)(7)]
  
 12.) VISIBILITY TRIANGLES SHALL BE DRAWN IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ZLDR S.94-305(E). THE PROPOSED
 10 FT. VISIBILITY TRIANGLES DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE
 ZONING CODE.
  
 13.) THE MINIMUM WIDTH OF A TWO-WAY DRIVE AISLE IS 24
 FT. THE PLANS SHOW A 20 FT. WIDE TWO-WAY DRIVE AISLE
 WHICH IS INSUFFICIENT AND DOES NOT MEET ZONING CODE.
 [ZLDR S.94-485]
  
 14.) HOW WIDE IS THE DRIVE AISLE ALONG DOCK STREET?
 PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS.
  
 15.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE SITE DATA
 TABULAR: A) THE PROJECT NUMBER IS PB CASE NO. 1875
 (Z20120033) B) CLARIFY WHAT IS "SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED"
 AS THE PROPOSED BUILDING DOES NOT MEET THE DEFINITION
 FOR "SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED" C) THE PROPOSED ZONING IS
 RPD D) CHECK CALCULATION FOR FLOOR AREA RATIO E) THE
 PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT INFORMATION DOES NOT MATCH THE
 BUILDING HEIGHT INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE
 ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS (BUILDING HEIGHT IS MEASURED
 FROM GRADE TO THE HIGHEST POINT OF THE BUILDING)
 F) CHECK THE PROVIDED PARKING CALCULATIONS (THERE DOES
 NOT SEEM TO BE 41 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED FOR THE
 PROJECT).
  
  
 ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) THE PROPOSED STYLE OF ARCHITECTURE SEEMS TO BE OUT
 OF CHARACTER WITH AREA. CONSIDERATION SHOULD BE MADE TO
 PROVIDE FOR AN ARCHITECTURAL STYLE THAT IS MORE
 COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA.
  
 2.) DIMENSION OUT ALL STRUCTURAL INTRUSIONS (I.E.
 OVERHANGS, BALCONIES, EAVES, ROOF OVERHANG
 PROJECTIONS). PLEASE NOTE THAT STRUCTURAL INTRUSIONS
 CANNOT EXTEND FARTHER THAN 3 FT. INTO ANY SETBACK.
 [ZLDR S.94-302]
  
  
 SIGNAGE:
  
 1.) PROVIDE SIGN DETAILS ON THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT/COMMUNITY SIGN.
  
  
 SITE LIGHTING (PHOTOMETRICS):
  
 1.) THE PLAN SHOWS THAT LIGHT POLE FIXTURES ARE
 PROPOSED INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR TO THE PROJECT SITE. ANY
 LIGHT POLE FIXTURES EXTERIOR TO THE PROJECT SITE SHALL
 BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. ANY
 POLE FIXTURES WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PROJECT SITE
 SHALL BE ILLUSTRATED IN ALL PLANS (I.E. SITE PLAN,
 LANDSCAPE PLAN, ETC.) WITH SETBACK DIMENSIONS FROM THE
 PROPERTY LINE(S) TO ENSURE THAT THERE IS NO CONFLICT
 WITH EXISTING/PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS AND
 DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OF
 THE ZONING DISTRICT.
  
 2.) PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING NOTE IN THE PLAN FOR
 CONSISTENCY WITH THE LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS OF THE
 ZLDRS: "ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO
 REDUCE GLARE AND SHALL BE ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT OR
 GLARE AWAY FROM ALL ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS,
 ADJACENT RESIDENCES, OR PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES." [ZLDR
 S.94-309(A)]
  
 3.) A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN IS MISSING FROM THE APPLICATION
 SUBMITTAL.
  
  
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:
  
 * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX
 (6) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 INCHES X
 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 INCHES, AND
 AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND DOCUMENTS.
  
 * CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTAL PLANS MAY RESULT IN
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE
 ($600.00).
  
 * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE
 QUESTIONS.
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved