City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Details - Project Z20120016

Plan Review Stops For Project Z20120016

Review Stop	AIPP			ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	05-12-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	scwelter			Date	01-11-2021	Time	10:24	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rrossano			Date	05-12-2021	Time	10:20	Sent To

Notes

2021-05-12 10:19:56	THE PUBLIC ART PASS IS CONTINGENT ON THE FOLLOWING:
	AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL, A COMPLETED
	PUBLIC ART ASSESSMENT APPLICATION, EVIDENCE OF ESCROW
	FOR THE 1%, BUDGET OF THE PROPOSED CONCEPT ALONG WITH
	OTHER ARTWORKS OR BALANCE AS A DEPOSIT TO THE CITY MUST
	BE COMPLETED.
	PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE TO [email protected], AND COPY
	[email protected], [email protected] AND [email protected] WHEN
	SUBMITTING FOR BUILDING PERMIT.
	PROPOSED ART CONCEPT OF THE ARTIST WORK FOR THE GARAGE
	WAS PRESENTED TO THE ARTLIFE COMMITTEE AS A CONCEPT AND
	NON-ACTION ITEM ON MAY 5, 2021.
	DEVELOPER MUST STILL PROVIDE BUDGET BREAKDOWN OF THE 1%
	INCLUDING VALUE OF PROPOSED CONCEPT, MATERIALS,
	MAINTENANCE PLAN ADDRESSING FLORIDA?S CLIMATE AND
	STREET NAMES (INTERSECTIONS) OF THE VARIOUS VANTAGE
	POINTS.

2021-01-11 11:01:02	PROPOSED ARTWORK IS TEMPORARY IN NATURE.
	MATERIAL HAS A SHORT LIFE SPAN IN SOUTH FLORIDA WEATHER
	(HEAT, HUMIDITY, SALT, AND RAIN)
	PROPOSED WORK WILL REQUIRE IN FIVE YEARS A COMPLETE
	RE-APPLICATION MAKING THIS A HIGH MAINTENANCE PROJECT
	DOES NOT COMPLY WITH VISUAL ACCESSIBILITY AS THE ARTIST
	HAS STATED THAT THERE ARE SPECIFIC VANTAGE POINTS TO
	?SEE? THE ARTWORK
	HAVING ONLY TWO VANTAGE POINTS TO VIEW THAT WORK POSES
	A SAFETY HAZARD INCLUDING ADA COMPLIANCE
	THE VALUE OF THE WORK IS UNDER THE 1%
	THE WORK IS NOT APPROPRIATE FOR THE SITE IN DESIGN,
	SCALE AND MATERIALS.
	DISTINCT ARTWORK SECTION 78-129 (B)(D): ARTWORK FOR
	COMPLIANCE WITH THE PUBLIC ART ASSESSMENT WILL NOT BE
	CONSIDERED AS COMPLIANT WITH ANY REQUIREMENTS OF THE
	ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. ANY
	REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PARKING GARAGE MAY NOT BE
	CONSIDERED AS PART OF THE PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT.
	I RECOMMENDED IN MY 10.27.2020 EMAIL TO JON SCHMIDT
	THAT THE PASEO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE LOCATION OF
	MULTIPLE ARTWORKS.

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	01-07-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	rrossano			Date	01-13-2021	Time	10:21	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rbrown			Date	01-13-2021	Time	19:06	Sent To

Notes

2021-01-13 19:36:46	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
	COMMENTS:

	1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
	SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
	ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.

	2. NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THE DATA TABLE
	ON SITE PLAN, SHEET A-100, AND PRJECT DATA PLAN SHEET
	A001, STATES THAT 1200 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED. THE
	NUMBER OF ACCSEEIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE BASED ON
	THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED SO 24 ACCESSIBLE
	PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED. THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF
	ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED SHALL BE IN
	ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 208.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY
	CODE.

	3. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THE PLANS DO NOT
	LABEL ANY OF THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES AS VAN
	ACCESIBLE. 4 VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE
	REQUIRED. PER SECTION 208.2.4 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY
	CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT
	LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN
	ACCESSIBLE? AND DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF
	502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE
	NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS
	ROUTE)

	4. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
	THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
	THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
	AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.

	5. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
	NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
	MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
	BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
	EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
	TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
	OTHER APPROVED METHODS.

	6. PARKING STRUCTURE ROOF ACCESS. SHEET A111 DOE NOT
	CLEARLY SHOW/LABEL WHAT IS ON THE PARKING STRUCTURE
	ROOF. IS THERE ANY PROPOSED BUILDING OCCUPANT ACCESS TO
	THE PARKING STRUCTURE ROOF? IF SO, PLEASE PROVIDE THE
	OCCUPANT COUNT.

	7. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. GREASE INTERCEPTORS MAY BE
	REQUIRED IF ANY OF THE RETAIL SPACES MIGHT BE
	RESTAURANTS. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE
	AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT TIM LARGE, CHIEF PLUMBING
	INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561)
	805-6692, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]

	8. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
	AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
	WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
	FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
	GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
	OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
	SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.

	9. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
	CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
	CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
	NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.

	10. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
	AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
	INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
	CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
	NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
	THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.

	11. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
	WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
	HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
	OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
	CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
	(561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]

	12. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
	TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE
	ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
	ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
	PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
	[email protected]

	ROBERT BROWN
	BUILDING OFFICIAL
	TEL: 561 805 6652
	EMAIL: [email protected]

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	4	Status	F	Date	12-23-2021		Cont ID
Sent By	rrossano			Date	12-23-2021	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rrossano			Date	12-23-2021	Time	Sent To

Notes

2021-12-23 10:16:23	NO COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR,
	ENG. SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098 [email protected] :

	COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE
	SUPER., WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-494-2262 OR
	[email protected]:

	-COULD NOT FIND RESPONSE LETTER IN RESUBMITTAL PACKAGE.
	DID NOT HAVE RESPONSE BACK FROM LAST REVIEW COMMENTS:
	PLEASE VERIFY ROOT BARRIERS ARE NOT NEEDED FOR THE CITY
	PARKS METERED WATER SERVICE NEAR THE NORTHWEST AREA OF
	PROPERTY;
	WATER DEMAND CALCULATIONS HAD FOOD OPERATIONS ITEM AND
	SEE CAFE ON PLANS, BUT DID NOT SEE ANY GREASE TRAPS.
	ARE ANY NEEDED?;
	THE EXIT DRIVEWAY CURBING NEAR THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE
	ON THE CIVIL PLANS DOES NOT MATCH THE SITE PLANS OR
	LANDSCAPING PLANS. PLEASE MAKE SURE ALL PLAN SETS
	MATCH. IF CIVIL PLANS ARE ALTERED, SEE IF ANY CONFLICTS
	ARISE WITH THE VEHICLE CIRCULATION PLANS.

	-AREA OF DETECTABLE TACTILE PADS NEAR DRIVEWAYS DOES
	NOT MATCH BETWEEN ALL PLAN SETS. PLEASE UPDATE ALL PLAN
	SETS SO THAT THEY MATCH.

	-ARE THE PEDESTRIAN REFUGES LEVEL WITH THE DRIVEWAYS
	WITHOUT RAISED ELEVATIONS?

	-ON THE CIVIL PLANS A COUPLE OF THE SOUTHERN BIKE RACKS
	APPEAR TO BE CONFLICTING WITH TREE TRUNKS BUT THEY LOOK
	ON THE LANDSCAPING PLANS. PLEASE UPDATE AS NEEDED.

	COMMENTS FROM MICHAEL TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, WPB
	PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-494-1047, [email protected] :

	-NO 3? SERVICE. USE 1? OR 4?.
	-NEED PROFILE OF WATER MAIN TIE IN SHOWING EXISTING
	UTILITIES AND CONFLICTS.
	-ADD NOTE THAT THIS IS IN LIFT STATION #40.
	-PROPOSED 8? PVC SANITARY IS TOO CLOSE TO THE FPL DUCT
	BANK.
	-WHEN 8? SANITARY LINE IS USED INSTALL A MANHOLE
	INSTEAD OF CLEAN OUT OR USE AN 8? CLEAN OUT.
	-IF NO EASEMENT IS PROVIDED THAN THE CLEAN OUT NEEDS TO
	BE IN THE RIGHT OF WAY.
	-SHOW PROFILE OF 8? CONNECTIONS WITH CONFLICTS AND
	CROSSINGS.
	-USE FDOT RESTORATION DETAIL.
	-MANHOLES NEED TO BE LEGIBLE ON DIXIE.
	-ADD NOTE TO LINE EXISTING GRAVITY SEWER AS THEY WILL
	BE CUTTING INTO IT.
	-SHOW EXISTING LATERALS ON GRAVITY MAIN. SHOW EXISTING
	WATER SERVICES.
	-PROVIDE POST CCTV OF PROPOSED LATERALS.
	-WHY PARKS AND REC REFERENCE?
	-ONCE SOFT DIGS AND POTHOLE REPORT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED
	WE WILL REASSESS.
	-?INSET A? IS UNDER REVIEW. WHY FIVE TAPS? WHY NOT
	GROUP AND SPLIT?

	COMMENTS FROM TRACY WARD, SR. STORMWATER ENG., CITY OF
	WPB ENG. SERVICES, [email protected], 561-494-1120:

	THE STREETS SURROUNDING THE DEVELOPMENT ARE MAINTAINED
	BY FDOT. FDOT WILL NEED TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED
	LANDSCAPING AND BIKE RACKS IN THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY AS WELL
	AS THE SIDEWALK AREAS SLOPING TOWARD THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY.

	THE PROPOSED 18? PIPE LEAVING STRUCTURE OCS-2 CONNECTS
	TO A DRAINAGE STRUCTURE WITH ONLY 15? DIAMETER PIPE
	LEAVING THE STRUCTURE.


	FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
	CONCERNS, THANKS.

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	06-15-2021		Cont ID
Sent By	rrossano			Date	06-15-2021	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rrossano			Date	06-15-2021	Time	Sent To

Notes

2021-06-15 07:02:05	1. PLEASE SHOW PAVEMENT RESTORATION AT SCALE FOR CITY
	MAINTAINED ROADWAYS PER CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL
	GC-8.
	2. PLEASE CONFIRM ALL STANDARD DETAILS ARE CURRENT
	VERSIONS. LATEST CAD VERSIONS CAN BE OBTAINED FROM
	JANICE TARBILL AT [email protected]
	3. PLEASE PROVIDE UPDATE ON STATUS OF REQUESTED CCTV.

	FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
	CONCERNS, THANKS.
	RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES
	DEPARTMENT, (561) 494-1098 [email protected]

	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD
	CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES,
	PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]:
	-PLEASE VERIFY ROOT BARRIERS ARE NOT NEEDED FOR THE
	CITY PARKS METERED WATER SERVICE NEAR THE NORTHWEST
	AREA OF PROPERTY.

	-WATER DEMAND CALCULATIONS HAD FOOD OPERATIONS ITEM AND
	SEE CAFE ON PLANS, BUT DID NOT SEE ANY GREASE TRAPS.
	ARE ANY NEEDED?

	-THE EXIT DRIVEWAY CURBING NEAR THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE
	ON THE CIVIL PLANS DOES NOT MATCH THE SITE PLANS OR
	LANDSCAPING PLANS. PLEASE MAKE SURE ALL PLAN SETS
	MATCH. IF CIVIL PLANS ARE ALTERED, SEE IF ANY CONFLICTS
	ARISE WITH THE VEHICLE CIRCULATION PLANS.

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	04-22-2021		Cont ID
Sent By	rrossano			Date	04-22-2021	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rrossano			Date	04-22-2021	Time	Sent To

Notes

2021-04-22 11:27:02	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD
	CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES,
	PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]:

	-PLEASE ADD NOTE OR LABEL TO UTILITY PLAN INCORPORATING
	RESPONSE TO PRIOR COMMENT ABOUT BUILDING STRUCTURES
	ENCROACHING ON EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENTS.

	-PLEASE ADD MORE DESCRIPTION TO LABEL OF 6 INCH METER
	ON INSET A OF UTILITY PLAN DESCRIBING WHAT THE WATER
	METER IS FEEDING, SIMILAR TO THE 3 INCH METER.

	-SHOW AND LABEL DRAINAGE FOR FIREROOM ON INSET A OF
	UTILITY PLAN.

	-THE BYPASSES FOR THE LARGE WATER METERS MAY NOT BE
	SHOWN TO SCALE ON UTILITY PLAN AND MAY EXTEND CLOSER TO
	THE BOLLARDS.

	-FURTHER FEEDBACK/DIRECTION ON THE WATER MAIN WORK MAY
	BE PROVIDED AT FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL.

	-PAVEMENT RESTORATION BOUNDARIES APPEAR SMALLER THAN
	REQUIRED BY STANDARDS. PLEASE SHOW THE ADDITIONAL
	PAVEMENT RESTORATION BOUNDARIES FOR THE SEWER WORK IN
	THE STREETS AND MAKE SURE BOUNDARIES COMPLY WITH
	STANDARDS.

	-WPB GIS AND ASBUILT SHOW EXISTING 8 INCH SEWER LATERAL
	AT EAST SIDE OF PROPERTY NEAR PROPOSED 6 INCH C900.
	PLEASE CONFIRM IF STILL THERE AND SHOW AND LABEL AS
	NEEDED.

	-TRAFFIC ARROWS ARE MISSING FOR SOUTHERN DRIVEWAY ON
	UTILITY PLAN. PLEASE ADD.

	-CONFIRM THAT THE PROPOSED 8 INCH SEWER LATERALS MAY
	HAVE 6 INCH CLEANOUTS.

	-VERIFY FIRE HYDRANTS HAVE THE NECESSARY CLEARANCE
	DISTANCES REQUIRED BY STANDARD DETAIL P-8.

	-FIRE HYDRANTS APPEAR TO BE HALF IN PLANTERS AND HALF
	IN SIDEWALKS. CAN PLANTERS BE EXTENDED SLIGHTLY AT
	THOSE AREAS SO THAT THE FIRE HYDRANTS ARE COMPLETELY IN
	THE PLANTER?

	-THE PROXIMITY OF SOME OF THE WATER UTILITIES TO TREES
	IS STILL CONCERNING. PLEASE ENSURE BOTH IRRIGATION
	METERS AND FIRE HYDRANTS HAVE ADEQUATE CLEARANCE
	DISTANCE. IF ROOT BARRIERS ARE BEING UTILIZED, PLEASE
	SHOW THOSE ON LANDSCAPE PLAN.

	-PARKS EXISTING METERED IRRIGATION SERVICE CURRENTLY
	HAS 2 INCH METER. RELOCATED WATER SERVICE ONLY SHOWS 1
	INCH METER. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT WPB PARKS APPROVED THE
	SIZE REDUCTION. ALSO ENSURE THAT A BACKFLOW CAGE IS
	INSTALLED IF REQUIRED BY PARKS.

	-PLEASE SHOW AND DESCRIBE HOW WPB UTILITY WORKERS WILL
	ACCESS THE WATER METERS THAT ARE ON THE FIRELINE
	BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES IN THE FIREROOM.

	-PROPERTY OWNER WILL BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT AND RECORD
	BACKFLOW COVENANT. CONTACT [email protected] FOR TEMPLATE
	AND DIRECTION.

	-CHECK SOUTHERN-MOST FLAG POLE ON WEST SIDE OF PROPERTY
	TO SEE IF IT CONFLICTS WITH DRAINAGE UTILITY.

	FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
	CONCERNS, THANKS.
	RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES
	DEPARTMENT, (561) 494-1098 [email protected]

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	01-07-2021		Cont ID
Sent By	rrossano			Date	01-07-2021	Time	Rev Time
Received By	rrossano			Date	01-07-2021	Time	Sent To

Notes

2021-01-07 10:23:13	1. THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF
	REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY
	AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND
	WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. TO VIEW
	DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER
	ENGINEERING RELATED DOCUMENTS, OPEN A BROWSER IN CHROME
	AND GO TO: WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGDOCS . TO LOGIN, UNDER
	?EMAIL? ENTER [email protected] ; UNDER ?PASSWORD? ENTER
	SIMPLE321#
	THERE ARE 4 PAGES OF AVAILABLE ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS
	FOR YOUR USE.
	2. CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH,
	FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08, ADOPTED
	SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18) CHAPTER 90
	UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. SEC. 90-7.
	POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER SERVICE
	FACILITIES OF THE CITY:
	THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
	CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
	BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
	BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
	3. AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
	CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
	STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
	MORE INFORMATION, OPEN A BROWSER IN CHROME AND GO TO:
	WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGDOCS .TO LOGIN, UNDER ?EMAIL? ENTER
	[email protected] ; UNDER ?PASSWORD? ENTER SIMPLE321#
	CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL IS ON PAGE 4.
	4. PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY
	OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC
	RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF
	YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
	MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
	IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
	[email protected] OR 561-494-1040 FOR FURTHER
	ASSISTANCE.
	5. PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS
	OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES,
	INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND
	SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES,
	METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE
	SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING
	GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS,
	ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL
	INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER
	LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
	PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN
	VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
	PLEASE SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT
	MATERIAL. ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL
	EXISTING AND PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT,
	INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &
	TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE
	RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL
	UTILITY CROSSINGS.
	6. CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY
	ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
	ROW.
	7. PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE
	DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB
	DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION).
	8. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND
	PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM
	AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE
	PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER.
	9. SHOW VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION INFORMATION
	(NAVD 88 AND NGVD 29).
	10. PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND
	STORMWATER ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE.
	11. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND
	IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED
	AREAS.
	12. PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
	PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
	13. PLEASE LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE
	APPLICABLE.
	14. PLEASE PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED
	LOCATION OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION.
	15. COORDINATE WITH MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE
	SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING
	PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT
	HIM AT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]
	16. PROVIDE DEDICATED UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS
	FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS.

	FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
	CONCERNS, THANKS. RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR,
	ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (561) 494-1098
	[email protected]

	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD
	CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES,
	PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]:

	-BUILDING STRUCTURES SHOULD NOT ENCROACH ON UTILITY
	EASEMENTS.

	-WEST SIDE OF BUILDING LOOKS LIKE IT MAY EXTEND INTO
	R/W. VERIFY IF THAT IS ACCEPTABLE.

	-EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT AT SOUTHEAST AREA OF PROPERTY
	NEED UTILITY EASEMENT.

	-VERIFY IF THE 14FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT ON NORTH SIDE OF
	THE PROPERTY IS EXTENDING DOWN MIDWAY ON THE EAST AND
	WEST SIDES OF THE PROPERTY. IF SO, PLEASE LABEL MORE
	CLEARLY ON UTILITY PLAN.

	-ENSURE THAT WATER METERS ARE OUT OF HEAVY PEDESTRIAN
	TRAFFIC.

	-THE 3INCH AND 6INCH METERS NEED TO BE ABOVE-GROUND
	INSTALLATION USING STANDARD DETAIL WS-3.

	-VERIFY THAT WATER SERVICES DO NOT HAVE TREE CONFLICTS
	WITH ROOTS. LANDSCAPING PLAN SHOWS MANY TREES NEAR THE
	WATER SERVICES. IF CONFLICT INCREASE CLEARANCE DISTANCE
	AND ADD ROOT BARRIERS.

	-CAN THE WATER SERVICES BE DESIGNED SO THAT THE
	PLUMBING DOES NOT CROSS?

	-LANDSCAPING PLAN DOES NOT SHOW THE ABOVE-GROUND
	BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES. PLEASE ADD ICONS FOR THE BACKFLOW
	ASSEMBLIES TO LANDSCAPING PLAN.

	-INSET A ON UTILITY PLAN HAS A VERTICAL DASHED LINE.
	HAVING TROUBLE FIGURING OUT WHAT IT IS ? PLEASE LABEL
	IT.

	-CONSIDER DUAL/PARALLEL BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES FOR THE
	LARGE METERS SO THAT WATER OUTAGES ARE MINIMIZED DURING
	BACKFLOW MAINTENANCE.

	-SOME DISTANCES FROM THE WATER METERS TO THE BACKFLOW
	ASSEMBLIES ARE EXCESSIVE. TRY TO REDUCE THOSE
	DISTANCES.

	-PLEASE ADD VISUAL MEASUREMENT ICON TO THE SCALE FOR
	INSET A ON UTILITY PLAN.

	-PLANS DO NOT SHOW PAVEMENT RESTORATION ON OKEECHOBEE
	OR QUADRILLE FOR THE UTILITY WORK BEING COMPLETED IN
	THE ROADWAY.

	-FOR THE FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ADD THE
	FOLLOWING TO THE UTILITY PLAN: WATER DEMAND
	CALCULATIONS, ADDRESS, AND STANDARD DETAIL COPIES (ON
	SEPARATE PAGE).

	-A WATER SERVICE ON WEST SIDE OF PROPERTY IS PROPOSED
	TO BE REMOVED, BUT IT IS A CITY PARKS WATER SERVICE.
	APPROVAL WOULD BE NEEDED FROM CITY PARKS DEPARTMENT AND
	THEY MAY REQUIRE IT TO BE RELOCATED.

	-CANNOT FIND AN FDC SHOWING ON THE UTILITY PLAN FOR THE
	FIRE SYSTEM. IS ONE NEEDED?

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	3	Status	P	Date	06-22-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	pleduc			Date	06-22-2021	Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc			Date	06-22-2021	Time	11:49	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	05-06-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	pleduc			Date	05-06-2021	Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc			Date	05-06-2021	Time	13:39	Sent To

Notes

2021-05-06 13:40:08	FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES.

	FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES NOT
	CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.

	FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT THE
	APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
	REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.

	PETER LEDUC
	FIRE MARSHAL
	561-804-4709
	[email protected]

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	01-06-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	pleduc			Date	01-06-2021	Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc			Date	01-06-2021	Time	14:19	Sent To

Notes

2021-01-06 15:07:38	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
	FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
	BEACH FIRE RESCUE.

	THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
	DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
	ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.

	THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
	PROPOSED PROJECT.

	1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
	WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
	PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
	PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
	TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
	STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
	MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
	PROTECTION.

	2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
	IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
	ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.

	3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
	ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
	ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
	AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
	WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.

	4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
	REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
	ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.

	5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
	THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION
	CODE, INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE
	CODES.

	6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,
	PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,
	INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE
	OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)

	7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA
	14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS
	STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE
	BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE
	BEING CONSTRUCTED.

	SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED,
	REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
	PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.

	IT IS RECOMMENDED FOR HIGH RISES TO HAVE TWO SEPARATE
	FDC LOCATIONS REMOTELY LOCATED WITH 100 FT OF FIRE
	HYDRANT. CONSIDER ONE ON OKEECHOBEE NEAR S DIXIE AND
	ANOTHER ON LAKEVIEW NEAR QUADRILLE AVE.

	7A. PER NFPA 14
	6.4.5.4* FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED
	NOT MORE THAN 100 FT (30.5 M) FROM THE NEAREST FIRE
	HYDRANT CONNECTED TO AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY.

	7B. PLEASE REVIEW THE DISTANCE SEPARATION OF THE
	STAIRWELLS AS THE SEPARATION DISTANCE IS NOT INDICATED.
	7.3.2.2* WHERE THE MOST REMOTE PORTION OF A
	NON-SPRINKLERED FLOOR OR STORY IS LOCATED IN EXCESS OF
	150 FT (45.7 M) OF TRAVEL DISTANCE FROM A HOSE
	CONNECTION IN OR ADJACENT TO A REQUIRED EXIT OR THE
	MOST REMOTE PORTION OF A SPRINKLERED FLOOR OR STORY
	IS LOCATED IN EXCESS OF 200 FT (61 M) OF TRAVEL
	DISTANCE FROM A HOSE CONNECTION IN OR ADJACENT TO A
	REQUIRED EXIT, ADDITIONAL HOSE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE
	PROVIDED, IN APPROVED LOCATIONS, WHERE REQUIRED BY THE
	LOCAL FIRE DEPARTMENT OR THE AHJ.

	7C. PER NFPA 1
	18.3 WATER SUPPLIES.
	18.3.1* AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING
	THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE
	PROVIDED TO ALL PREMISES UPON WHICH FACILITIES,
	BUILDINGS, OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS ARE HEREAFTER
	CONSTRUCTED OR MOVED INTO THE JURISDICTION. THE
	APPROVED WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
	SECTION 18.4.
	PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004,
	FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE
	POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF
	APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT,
	CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR
	AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER
	SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA)
	AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS
	PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS.
	FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE
	PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?

	7D. THE LOCATION OF THE DDCV FIRE LINE LOCATION SHALL
	MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE
	COORDINATED WITH THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S
	ENGINEERS OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S
	PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE.


	8. A CLASS ?A? NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM
	SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP
	DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND
	APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY
	INSTALLATION.

	9. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7
	KEYWAY SYSTEM.

	ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S
	EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA
	B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.

	ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN
	WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL
	LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET
	MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER
	ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN
	AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE
	IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.

	10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
	BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
	DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
	EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
	PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
	SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.

	11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
	DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
	ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
	FIRE PREVENTION.

	ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS
	DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE
	BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND
	FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET
	OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER
	ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES.

	12. COMMAND ROOM - THERE WAS NO CLEAR INDICATION OF THE
	LOCATION OF THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER.

	THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1,
	CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN
	THE FOLLOWING FEATURES:

	11.9.1 THE LOCATION, DESIGN, CONTENT, AND FIRE
	DEPARTMENT ACCESS OF THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL
	BE APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.

	IT SHALL BE LOCATED WITH AN EXTERIOR DOOR ACCESS AND IN
	CLOSE RELATION TO THE LOBBY WITH ACCESS.

	11.9.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE SEPARATED
	FROM THE REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING BY A FIRE BARRIER
	HAVING A FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 1
	HOUR.

	11.9.3 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER ROOM SHALL BE A
	MINIMUM OF 96 FT2 (8.9 M2) WITH A MINIMUM DIMENSION OF
	8 FT (2.4 M).

	A.HOWEVER, PER FL BLDG CODE;(MORE STRICT) IT SHALL BE A
	MINIMUM OF 200 FT SQUARED WITH A MINIMUM DIMENSION OF
	10 FT.
	B. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.
	C. A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
	ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
	D. SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL
	FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF
	EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING
	EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS AND THE LOCATION
	OF FIRE WALLS, FIRE BARRIERS, FIRE PARTITIONS, SMOKE
	BARRIERS AND SMOKE PARTITIONS
	E. A WORK TABLE.
	F. IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
	FOR THE BUILDING.
	G. THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
	CONTROL UNIT.
	H. ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION OF
	THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL
	I. STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR DISTRIBUTION
	SYSTEMS.
	J. CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS SIMULTANEOUSLY
	K. SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY
	PANELS
	L. EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS
	M. FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
	N. GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND
	TRANSFER FEATURES.
	O. PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED
	BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE
	P. CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL
	Q. ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME
	A17.1.
	R. ELEVATOR EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER SELECTOR
	SWITCH(ES), WHERE EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER IS
	PROVIDED

	PER NFPA 101, CH 11

	11.8.6* EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER.

	11.8.6.1 AN EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE PROVIDED
	IN A
	LOCATION APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.
	11.8.6.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL CONTAIN THE
	FOLLOWING:
	(1) VOICE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM PANELS AND CONTROLS
	(2) FIRE DEPARTMENT TWO-WAY TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION
	SERVICE
	PANELS AND CONTROLS WHERE REQUIRED BY ANOTHER SECTION
	OF THIS
	CODE
	(3) FIRE DETECTION AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATION
	PANELS
	(4) ELEVATOR FLOOR LOCATION AND OPERATION ANNUNCIATORS
	(5) ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME
	A17.1/CSA B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS AND ESCALATORS
	(6) ELEVATOR EMERGENCY POWER SELECTOR SWITCH(ES) WHERE
	PROVIDED
	IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME A17.1/CSA B44
	(7) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATERFLOW ANNUNCIATORS
	(8) EMERGENCY GENERATOR STATUS INDICATORS
	(9) CONTROLS FOR ANY AUTOMATIC STAIRWAY DOOR UNLOCKING
	SYSTEM
	(10) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
	(11) TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
	ACCESS TO THE
	PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
	(12) STAIRWAY VIDEO MONITORING EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED BY
	11.8.8

	13. RADIO

	NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY
	RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.
	11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM
	RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
	COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL
	DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.

	NFPA 72, 24.5.2* TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS
	ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS.
	24.5.2.2 RADIO COVERAGE. RADIO COVERAGE SHALL BE
	PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE BUILDING AS A PERCENTAGE OF
	FLOOR AREA AS SPECIFIED IN 24.5.2.2.1 THROUGH
	24.5.2.2.3.
	24.5.2.2.1 CRITICAL AREAS. CRITICAL AREAS, SUCH AS THE
	EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER(S), THE FIRE PUMP ROOM(S),
	EXIT STAIRS, EXIT PASSAGEWAYS, ELEVATOR LOBBIES,
	STANDPIPE CABINETS, SPRINKLER SECTIONAL VALVE
	LOCATIONS, AND OTHER AREAS DEEMED CRITICAL BY THE
	AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH
	99 PERCENT FLOOR AREA RADIO COVERAGE.
	24.5.2.2.2 GENERAL BUILDING AREAS. GENERAL BUILDING
	AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH 90 PERCENT FLOOR AREA
	RADIO COVERAGE.
	24.5.2.3 SIGNAL STRENGTH.
	24.5.2.3.1 INBOUND. A MINIMUM INBOUND SIGNAL STRENGTH
	OF -95 DBM, OR OTHER SIGNAL STRENGTH AS REQUIRED BY THE
	AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL BE PROVIDED
	THROUGHOUT THE COVERAGE AREA.
	24.5.2.3.2 OUTBOUND. A MINIMUM OUTBOUND SIGNAL STRENGTH
	OF -95 DBM AT THE DONOR SITE, OR OTHER SIGNAL STRENGTH
	AS REQUIRED BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL
	BE PROVIDED FROM THE COVERAGE AREA.

	THE SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL
	STRENGTH OF -95 DBM FOR THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST
	PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE. TESTING SHALL BE BY AN
	ACCEPTABLE NATIONAL STANDARD DOCUMENTING PERCENTAGES
	NOTED ABOVE AND BY ACTUAL RADIO TESTING BY FIRE
	PERSONNEL. IF THE MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A
	BI-DIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH
	A MINIMUM 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP.
	PLEASE CONTACT MARK FILLA, PALM BEACH COUNTY PUBLIC
	SAFETY RADIO SYSTEMS MANAGER, AS OUR RADIOS OPERATE ON
	THEIR SYSTEM FOR DETAILED RADIO FREQUENCY AND
	INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.


	14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS
	BUILDING. DUE TO SIZE AND ACCESS POINTS MULTIPLE KNOX
	BOXES MAY BE REQUIRED.

	PLEASE COORDINATE WITH THE OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL.

	ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS,
	PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.

	15. THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA
	101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE PROTECTION
	EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING:

	THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED,
	INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
	NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204,
	STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY
	RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR
	RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY
	HAVING JURISDICTION.

	THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE
	INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE
	APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED
	MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE
	SYSTEM.
	ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL
	INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.9.

	16. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
	DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.

	17. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
	PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
	THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.

	PETER LEDUC
	FIRE MARSHAL
	561-804-4709
	[email protected]

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	6	Status	P	Date	02-28-2023			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	02-28-2023	Time	14:06	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	02-28-2023	Time	14:06	Sent To

Notes

2023-02-28 14:07:36	FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	561-822-1462
	PROJECT: WEST PALM POINT Z20120016
	FEBRUARY 28, 2023
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS FOR THE FINAL SITE PLAN
	APPROVAL:


	1. SATISFIED. LIST THE TREE SPECIES AND SQUARE FOOTAGE
	CREDIT FOR THE OPEN SPACE SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS
	FOR EACH OPEN SPACE. PERCENTAGES DO NOT MEET THE
	REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ENTIRE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE SO AN
	AREA MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS NEEDS TO BE DESIGNATED.
	OS-1 OPEN SPACE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE LANDSCAPE PLAN
	SHEET LP-1 FOR THE NUMBER OF CLUSIA TREES AT THE
	NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PLAZA.
	NEEDS TO BE BASED ON PROVIDED. DESIGNATE AN AREA THAT
	MEETS THE MINIMUM OPEN SPACE AREA REQUIRED AND THEN
	PROVIDE PERCENTAGES OF VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY
	FOR THAT AREA. 17,895 SQ FT REQUIRES 4,473.75 SQ FT
	VEGETATED AREA AND 5,368.5 SQ FT TREE CANOPY, WHICH ARE
	NOT MET.
	THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE PLAZA NEEDS TO MEET THE CRITERIA
	ABOVE. THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE ROOFTOP GARDEN HAS SOME
	TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS THAT ARE OFF
	AND LIGUSTRUMS ARE NOT COUNTED.
	10/31/22: THE AREA DESIGNATED AS PUBLIC OPEN SPACE HAS
	CHANGED FROM THE APPROVAL. MAKE THE FOLLOWING
	CORRECTIONS TO THE PLAN:
	??? THE AREA CANNOT HAVE THE SMALL PIECE SPLIT OFF FOR
	THE PASEO, AS IT WOULD HAVE TO MEET THE OPEN SPACE
	REQUIREMENTS ON ITS OWN IF SEPARATED. IF CHANGING THE
	DESIGNATED AREA, SHOW ALL THE REQUIREMENTS ARE MET FOR
	THE NEW AREA.
	??? ADDITIONAL TREES PROVIDED FOR THE CONDITION FOR THE
	5 SHADE TREES TO BE PROVIDED ON THE SITE ARE NOT TO BE
	COUNTED TOWARD OPEN SPACE CANOPY REQUIREMENTS.
	2. SATISFIED. THE WEST STREETSCAPE DOES NOT MEET THE
	REQUIREMENTS FOR PLACEMENT OR NUMBER OF THE REQUIRED
	STREET TREES ALONG THE CURB. THE MEDIAN PLACEMENT OF
	TREES DO NOT MEET THE INTENT OF PROVIDING TREE CANOPY
	OVER THE PEDESTRIAN AREAS OF THE STREETSCAPE.
	THE RESPONSE TO COMMENT DID NOT INCLUDE THE WAIVER
	REQUEST FOR THE WEST STREETSCAPE SEGMENT AS INDICATED
	ON SHEET LP-1. 4 TREES ARE PROVIDED IN THE STREETSCAPE,
	STAFF DISCUSSED AND REQUESTS ADDING ONE ADDITIONAL TREE
	ON EACH SIDE OF THE DROPOFF CANOPY TO PROVIDE
	ADDITIONAL SHADE FOR THE SIDEWALK AREA AND ADDING THE
	REMAINING 3 TREES TO THE PLAZA PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TO
	PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PEDESTRIAN SHADE. THIS MEETS THE
	INTENT OF THE STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS.
	TREES ADDED IN QUADRILLE MEDIAN DO NOT CONTRIBUTE TO
	SHADE FOR PEDESTRIANS BUT WILL IMPROVE THE AESTHETICS.
	STAFF SUGGESTS THE USE OF BULNESIA ARBOREA TO FOLLOW
	THE PATTERN ON QUADRILLE AND ALABAMA AVENUE ADJACENT TO
	RESTORATION HARDWARE SITE.
	10/31/22: THE 5 ADDITIONAL SHADE TREES NEED TO BE
	PROVIDED ON SITE AND IDENTIFIED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.

	3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE PRELIMINARY FDOT APPROVAL FOR ALL
	TREES IN THE FDOT RIGHT OF WAY.
	THE STREET TREES EAST OF THE GARAGE ENTRANCE ON
	LAKEVIEW AND THE STREET TREES WEST OF THE GARAGE
	ENTRANCE ON OKEECHOBEE APPEAR TO BE IN FDOT SIGHT LINES
	PER THE ENGINEERING PLANS. THESE TREES NEED TO BE MOVED
	OUT OF THE SIGHT LINES CLOSER TO THE BUILDING. THERE
	MAY BE DRAINAGE LINES ON THE OKEECHOBEE SIDE THAT WILL
	ALSO HAVE TO BE MOVED TO ACCOMMODATE THE TREES.
	10/31/22 INDICATE IF THE STREETSCAPE PLAN SUBMITTED
	WILL MEET FDOT PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS.


	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL

	1. EXFILTRATION AND DRAINAGE SYSTEM LOCATIONS WILL BE
	DESIGNED TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH THE STREET TREES AND
	PLAZA TREES AS SHOWN IN THE APPROVED VERSION OF THE
	LANDSCAPE PLAN.
	2. STREET TREES AND LANDSCAPING WILL REQUIRE A FDOT
	PERMIT.

	THESE CONDITIONS ARE IN ADDITION TO THE PREVIOUS
	CONDITIONS.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	5	Status	F	Date	10-31-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	10-31-2022	Time	12:48	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	10-31-2022	Time	12:48	Sent To

Notes

2022-10-31 12:51:46	FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	561-822-1462
	PROJECT: WEST PALM POINT Z20120016
	OCTOBER 31, 2022
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS FOR THE FINAL SITE PLAN
	APPROVAL:


	1. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. LIST THE TREE SPECIES AND
	SQUARE FOOTAGE CREDIT FOR THE OPEN SPACE SQUARE FOOTAGE
	CALCULATIONS FOR EACH OPEN SPACE. PERCENTAGES DO NOT
	MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ENTIRE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
	SO AN AREA MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS NEEDS TO BE
	DESIGNATED.
	OS-1 OPEN SPACE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE LANDSCAPE PLAN
	SHEET LP-1 FOR THE NUMBER OF CLUSIA TREES AT THE
	NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PLAZA.
	NEEDS TO BE BASED ON PROVIDED. DESIGNATE AN AREA THAT
	MEETS THE MINIMUM OPEN SPACE AREA REQUIRED AND THEN
	PROVIDE PERCENTAGES OF VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY
	FOR THAT AREA. 17,895 SQ FT REQUIRES 4,473.75 SQ FT
	VEGETATED AREA AND 5,368.5 SQ FT TREE CANOPY, WHICH ARE
	NOT MET.
	THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE PLAZA NEEDS TO MEET THE CRITERIA
	ABOVE. THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE ROOFTOP GARDEN HAS SOME
	TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS THAT ARE OFF
	AND LIGUSTRUMS ARE NOT COUNTED.
	10/31/22: THE AREA DESIGNATED AS PUBLIC OPEN SPACE HAS
	CHANGED FROM THE APPROVAL. MAKE THE FOLLOWING
	CORRECTIONS TO THE PLAN:
	??? THE AREA CANNOT HAVE THE SMALL PIECE SPLIT OFF FOR
	THE PASEO, AS IT WOULD HAVE TO MEET THE OPEN SPACE
	REQUIREMENTS ON ITS OWN IF SEPARATED. IF CHANGING THE
	DESIGNATED AREA, SHOW ALL THE REQUIREMENTS ARE MET FOR
	THE NEW AREA.
	??? ADDITIONAL TREES PROVIDED FOR THE CONDITION FOR THE
	5 SHADE TREES TO BE PROVIDED ON THE SITE ARE NOT TO BE
	COUNTED TOWARD OPEN SPACE CANOPY REQUIREMENTS.
	2. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. THE WEST STREETSCAPE DOES
	NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR PLACEMENT OR NUMBER OF
	THE REQUIRED STREET TREES ALONG THE CURB. THE MEDIAN
	PLACEMENT OF TREES DO NOT MEET THE INTENT OF PROVIDING
	TREE CANOPY OVER THE PEDESTRIAN AREAS OF THE
	STREETSCAPE.
	THE RESPONSE TO COMMENT DID NOT INCLUDE THE WAIVER
	REQUEST FOR THE WEST STREETSCAPE SEGMENT AS INDICATED
	ON SHEET LP-1. 4 TREES ARE PROVIDED IN THE STREETSCAPE,
	STAFF DISCUSSED AND REQUESTS ADDING ONE ADDITIONAL TREE
	ON EACH SIDE OF THE DROPOFF CANOPY TO PROVIDE
	ADDITIONAL SHADE FOR THE SIDEWALK AREA AND ADDING THE
	REMAINING 3 TREES TO THE PLAZA PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TO
	PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PEDESTRIAN SHADE. THIS MEETS THE
	INTENT OF THE STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS.
	TREES ADDED IN QUADRILLE MEDIAN DO NOT CONTRIBUTE TO
	SHADE FOR PEDESTRIANS BUT WILL IMPROVE THE AESTHETICS.
	STAFF SUGGESTS THE USE OF BULNESIA ARBOREA TO FOLLOW
	THE PATTERN ON QUADRILLE AND ALABAMA AVENUE ADJACENT TO
	RESTORATION HARDWARE SITE.
	10/31/22: THE 5 ADDITIONAL SHADE TREES NEED TO BE
	PROVIDED ON SITE AND IDENTIFIED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.

	3. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE PRELIMINARY FDOT
	APPROVAL FOR ALL TREES IN THE FDOT RIGHT OF WAY.
	THE STREET TREES EAST OF THE GARAGE ENTRANCE ON
	LAKEVIEW AND THE STREET TREES WEST OF THE GARAGE
	ENTRANCE ON OKEECHOBEE APPEAR TO BE IN FDOT SIGHT LINES
	PER THE ENGINEERING PLANS. THESE TREES NEED TO BE MOVED
	OUT OF THE SIGHT LINES CLOSER TO THE BUILDING. THERE
	MAY BE DRAINAGE LINES ON THE OKEECHOBEE SIDE THAT WILL
	ALSO HAVE TO BE MOVED TO ACCOMMODATE THE TREES.
	10/31/22 INDICATE IF THE STREETSCAPE PLAN SUBMITTED
	WILL MEET FDOT PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	4	Status	P	Date	01-10-2022			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	01-10-2022	Time	11:18	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	01-10-2022	Time	11:18	Sent To

Notes

2022-01-10 11:19:02	FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	561-822-1462
	PROJECT: WEST PALM POINT Z20120016
	JANUARY 10, 2022
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

	1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE
	DISPOSITION PLAN AND THE TREE INVENTORY LIST:
	? CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. EXPLAIN WHERE THE RELOCATED
	ROYAL PALMS WILL BE PLANTED
	? SATISFIED. #12 FICUS WOULD BE 300 SQ FT MITIGATION
	? SATISFIED. #13 WASHINGTONIA PALM IS CATEGORY 4, SO 50
	SQ FT MITIGATION
	? SATISFIED. CORRECT SPELLING FOR MITIGATION REQ (SF)
	COLUMN

	2. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. LIST THE TREE SPECIES AND
	SQUARE FOOTAGE CREDIT FOR THE OPEN SPACE SQUARE FOOTAGE
	CALCULATIONS FOR EACH OPEN SPACE. PERCENTAGES DO NOT
	MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ENTIRE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
	SO AN AREA MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS NEEDS TO BE
	DESIGNATED.
	OS-1 OPEN SPACE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE LANDSCAPE PLAN
	SHEET LP-1 FOR THE NUMBER OF CLUSIA TREES AT THE
	NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PLAZA.
	NEEDS TO BE BASED ON PROVIDED. DESIGNATE AN AREA THAT
	MEETS THE MINIMUM OPEN SPACE AREA REQUIRED AND THEN
	PROVIDE PERCENTAGES OF VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY
	FOR THAT AREA. 17,895 SQ FT REQUIRES 4,473.75 SQ FT
	VEGETATED AREA AND 5,368.5 SQ FT TREE CANOPY, WHICH ARE
	NOT MET.
	THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE PLAZA NEEDS TO MEET THE CRITERIA
	ABOVE. THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE ROOFTOP GARDEN HAS SOME
	TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS THAT ARE OFF
	AND LIGUSTRUMS ARE NOT COUNTED.

	3. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-113, CALCULATIONS FOR
	NUMBER OF REQUIRED STREET TREES NEED TO BE CORRECTED.
	LIST TOTAL LENGTH OF EACH PROPERTY LINE SEGMENT, DIVIDE
	BY 30, THEN INDICATE THE NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED,
	ROUNDING UP FOR ANY PORTION LEFT. ACCESSWAYS ARE NOT
	DEDUCTED.

	4. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. THE WEST STREETSCAPE DOES
	NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR PLACEMENT OR NUMBER OF
	THE REQUIRED STREET TREES ALONG THE CURB. THE MEDIAN
	PLACEMENT OF TREES DO NOT MEET THE INTENT OF PROVIDING
	TREE CANOPY OVER THE PEDESTRIAN AREAS OF THE
	STREETSCAPE.
	THE RESPONSE TO COMMENT DID NOT INCLUDE THE WAIVER
	REQUEST FOR THE WEST STREETSCAPE SEGMENT AS INDICATED
	ON SHEET LP-1. 4 TREES ARE PROVIDED IN THE STREETSCAPE,
	STAFF DISCUSSED AND REQUESTS ADDING ONE ADDITIONAL TREE
	ON EACH SIDE OF THE DROPOFF CANOPY TO PROVIDE
	ADDITIONAL SHADE FOR THE SIDEWALK AREA AND ADDING THE
	REMAINING 3 TREES TO THE PLAZA PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TO
	PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PEDESTRIAN SHADE. THIS MEETS THE
	INTENT OF THE STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS.
	TREES ADDED IN QUADRILLE MEDIAN DO NOT CONTRIBUTE TO
	SHADE FOR PEDESTRIANS BUT WILL IMPROVE THE AESTHETICS.
	STAFF SUGGESTS THE USE OF BULNESIA ARBOREA TO FOLLOW
	THE PATTERN ON QUADRILLE AND ALABAMA AVENUE ADJACENT TO
	RESTORATION HARDWARE SITE.


	5. SATISFIED. FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN OPTIONS POINTS
	CANNOT BE COUNTED FOR 51% OR MORE NATIVE GROUNDCOVER,
	AS THEY ARE ALL NON-NATIVE. POINTS CANNOT BE COUNTED
	FOR 51% OR MORE NATIVE SHRUBS, AS THEY ARE ALL
	NON-NATIVE.

	6. SATISFIED. CORRECT IN THE PLANT LIST: NATCHEZ CRAPE
	MYRTLE IS NOT FLORIDA NATIVE. AGAVE AMERICANA IS NOT
	FLORIDA NATIVE.

	7. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES ON
	LANDSCAPE PLAN, ALSO LOCATIONS OF VALVES AND BACKFLOW
	PREVENTERS AND FPL TRANSFORMERS. SCREENING MUST BE
	PROVIDED. THERE ARE CONFLICTS BETWEEN UTILITIES AND
	LANDSCAPING THAT WILL HAVE TO BE RESOLVED.

	8. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-113, ADJUST LOCATIONS OF
	REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL TO ONLY SHOW UNDER HARDSCAPE
	ADJACENT TO STREET TREES. AREA FOR STRUCTURAL SOIL AND
	PLANTING AREA SHOULD BE APPROXIMATELY 14 FEET IN LENGTH
	AND 9 FEET IN WIDTH RELATIVE TO THE BACK OF CURB.
	STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL IS TO SHOW THE CONSTRUCTION
	CROSS SECTION FOR DEPTH OF 36 INCHES, AND PLANTING SOIL
	IN THE PLANTING AREA. DO NOT INCLUDE TREE GRATES UNLESS
	NEEDED FOR ADA TRAVEL WIDTH. CORRECT THE DETAIL TO
	REFLECT THIS.

	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 5/4/21:

	9. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE TREES PROVIDED FOR MITIGATION
	PROVIDED ON THE TREE DISPOSITION SHEET TD-1 TO MATCH
	THE PLANT LIST. CATHEDRAL OAK, NOT HIGHRISE OAK.
	10. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE PRELIMINARY FDOT
	APPROVAL FOR ALL TREES IN THE FDOT RIGHT OF WAY.
	THE STREET TREES EAST OF THE GARAGE ENTRANCE ON
	LAKEVIEW AND THE STREET TREES WEST OF THE GARAGE
	ENTRANCE ON OKEECHOBEE APPEAR TO BE IN FDOT SIGHT LINES
	PER THE ENGINEERING PLANS. THESE TREES NEED TO BE MOVED
	OUT OF THE SIGHT LINES CLOSER TO THE BUILDING. THERE
	MAY BE DRAINAGE LINES ON THE OKEECHOBEE SIDE THAT WILL
	ALSO HAVE TO BE MOVED TO ACCOMMODATE THE TREES.

	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. LOCATIONS OF
	ROYAL PALMS TO BE TRANSPLANTED WILL BE DETERMINED AT
	TIME OF PERMIT.
	2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
	3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
	WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
	SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	12-21-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	12-21-2021	Time	13:23	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	12-20-2021	Time	16:11	Sent To

Notes

2021-12-21 13:23:58	FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	561-822-1462
	PROJECT: WEST PALM POINT Z20120016
	DECEMBER 21, 2021
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

	1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE
	DISPOSITION PLAN AND THE TREE INVENTORY LIST:
	? CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. EXPLAIN WHERE THE RELOCATED
	ROYAL PALMS WILL BE PLANTED
	? SATISFIED. #12 FICUS WOULD BE 300 SQ FT MITIGATION
	? SATISFIED. #13 WASHINGTONIA PALM IS CATEGORY 4, SO 50
	SQ FT MITIGATION
	? SATISFIED. CORRECT SPELLING FOR MITIGATION REQ (SF)
	COLUMN

	2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. LIST THE TREE SPECIES AND
	SQUARE FOOTAGE CREDIT FOR THE OPEN SPACE SQUARE FOOTAGE
	CALCULATIONS FOR EACH OPEN SPACE. PERCENTAGES DO NOT
	MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ENTIRE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
	SO AN AREA MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS NEEDS TO BE
	DESIGNATED.
	OS-1 OPEN SPACE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE LANDSCAPE PLAN
	SHEET LP-1 FOR THE NUMBER OF CLUSIA TREES AT THE
	NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PLAZA.
	NEEDS TO BE BASED ON PROVIDED. DESIGNATE AN AREA THAT
	MEETS THE MINIMUM OPEN SPACE AREA REQUIRED AND THEN
	PROVIDE PERCENTAGES OF VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY
	FOR THAT AREA. 17,895 SQ FT REQUIRES 4,473.75 SQ FT
	VEGETATED AREA AND 5,368.5 SQ FT TREE CANOPY, WHICH ARE
	NOT MET.
	THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE PLAZA NEEDS TO MEET THE CRITERIA
	ABOVE. THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE ROOFTOP GARDEN HAS SOME
	TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS THAT ARE OFF
	AND LIGUSTRUMS ARE NOT COUNTED.

	3. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-113, CALCULATIONS FOR
	NUMBER OF REQUIRED STREET TREES NEED TO BE CORRECTED.
	LIST TOTAL LENGTH OF EACH PROPERTY LINE SEGMENT, DIVIDE
	BY 30, THEN INDICATE THE NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED,
	ROUNDING UP FOR ANY PORTION LEFT. ACCESSWAYS ARE NOT
	DEDUCTED.

	4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE WEST STREETSCAPE DOES NOT
	MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR PLACEMENT OR NUMBER OF THE
	REQUIRED STREET TREES ALONG THE CURB. THE MEDIAN
	PLACEMENT OF TREES DO NOT MEET THE INTENT OF PROVIDING
	TREE CANOPY OVER THE PEDESTRIAN AREAS OF THE
	STREETSCAPE.
	THE RESPONSE TO COMMENT DID NOT INCLUDE THE WAIVER
	REQUEST FOR THE WEST STREETSCAPE SEGMENT AS INDICATED
	ON SHEET LP-1. 4 TREES ARE PROVIDED IN THE STREETSCAPE,
	STAFF DISCUSSED AND REQUESTS ADDING ONE ADDITIONAL TREE
	ON EACH SIDE OF THE DROPOFF CANOPY TO PROVIDE
	ADDITIONAL SHADE FOR THE SIDEWALK AREA AND ADDING THE
	REMAINING 3 TREES TO THE PLAZA PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TO
	PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PEDESTRIAN SHADE. THIS MEETS THE
	INTENT OF THE STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS.
	TREES ADDED IN QUADRILLE MEDIAN DO NOT CONTRIBUTE TO
	SHADE FOR PEDESTRIANS BUT WILL IMPROVE THE AESTHETICS.
	STAFF SUGGESTS THE USE OF BULNESIA ARBOREA TO FOLLOW
	THE PATTERN ON QUADRILLE AND ALABAMA AVENUE ADJACENT TO
	RESTORATION HARDWARE SITE.


	5. SATISFIED. FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN OPTIONS POINTS
	CANNOT BE COUNTED FOR 51% OR MORE NATIVE GROUNDCOVER,
	AS THEY ARE ALL NON-NATIVE. POINTS CANNOT BE COUNTED
	FOR 51% OR MORE NATIVE SHRUBS, AS THEY ARE ALL
	NON-NATIVE.

	6. SATISFIED. CORRECT IN THE PLANT LIST: NATCHEZ CRAPE
	MYRTLE IS NOT FLORIDA NATIVE. AGAVE AMERICANA IS NOT
	FLORIDA NATIVE.

	7. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES ON
	LANDSCAPE PLAN, ALSO LOCATIONS OF VALVES AND BACKFLOW
	PREVENTERS AND FPL TRANSFORMERS. SCREENING MUST BE
	PROVIDED. THERE ARE CONFLICTS BETWEEN UTILITIES AND
	LANDSCAPING THAT WILL HAVE TO BE RESOLVED.

	8. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-113, ADJUST LOCATIONS OF
	REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL TO ONLY SHOW UNDER HARDSCAPE
	ADJACENT TO STREET TREES. AREA FOR STRUCTURAL SOIL AND
	PLANTING AREA SHOULD BE APPROXIMATELY 14 FEET IN LENGTH
	AND 9 FEET IN WIDTH RELATIVE TO THE BACK OF CURB.
	STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL IS TO SHOW THE CONSTRUCTION
	CROSS SECTION FOR DEPTH OF 36 INCHES, AND PLANTING SOIL
	IN THE PLANTING AREA. DO NOT INCLUDE TREE GRATES UNLESS
	NEEDED FOR ADA TRAVEL WIDTH. CORRECT THE DETAIL TO
	REFLECT THIS.

	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 5/4/21:

	9. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE TREES PROVIDED FOR MITIGATION
	PROVIDED ON THE TREE DISPOSITION SHEET TD-1 TO MATCH
	THE PLANT LIST. CATHEDRAL OAK, NOT HIGHRISE OAK.
	10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE PRELIMINARY FDOT
	APPROVAL FOR ALL TREES IN THE FDOT RIGHT OF WAY.
	THE STREET TREES EAST OF THE GARAGE ENTRANCE ON
	LAKEVIEW AND THE STREET TREES WEST OF THE GARAGE
	ENTRANCE ON OKEECHOBEE APPEAR TO BE IN FDOT SIGHT LINES
	PER THE ENGINEERING PLANS. THESE TREES NEED TO BE MOVED
	OUT OF THE SIGHT LINES CLOSER TO THE BUILDING. THERE
	MAY BE DRAINAGE LINES ON THE OKEECHOBEE SIDE THAT WILL
	ALSO HAVE TO BE MOVED TO ACCOMMODATE THE TREES.

	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. LOCATIONS OF
	ROYAL PALMS TO BE TRANSPLANTED WILL BE DETERMINED AT
	TIME OF PERMIT.
	2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
	3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
	WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
	SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
	4. LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS SHALL NOT BLOCK TREE
	ROOTS FROM STRUCTURAL SOIL AREAS OR THERE IS NO POINT
	IN PROVIDING THE STRUCTURAL SOIL.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	05-05-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	05-05-2021	Time	12:20	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	05-05-2021	Time	12:20	Sent To

Notes

2021-05-05 12:21:52	FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	561-822-1462
	PROJECT: WEST PALM POINT Z20120016
	MAY 5, 2021
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

	1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE
	DISPOSITION PLAN AND THE TREE INVENTORY LIST:
	? CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. EXPLAIN WHERE THE RELOCATED
	ROYAL PALMS WILL BE PLANTED
	? SATISFIED. #12 FICUS WOULD BE 300 SQ FT MITIGATION
	? SATISFIED. #13 WASHINGTONIA PALM IS CATEGORY 4, SO 50
	SQ FT MITIGATION
	? SATISFIED. CORRECT SPELLING FOR MITIGATION REQ (SF)
	COLUMN

	2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. LIST THE TREE SPECIES AND
	SQUARE FOOTAGE CREDIT FOR THE OPEN SPACE SQUARE FOOTAGE
	CALCULATIONS FOR EACH OPEN SPACE. PERCENTAGES DO NOT
	MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ENTIRE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
	SO AN AREA MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS NEEDS TO BE
	DESIGNATED.
	OS-1 OPEN SPACE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE LANDSCAPE PLAN
	SHEET LP-1 FOR THE NUMBER OF CLUSIA TREES AT THE
	NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PLAZA.

	3. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-113, CALCULATIONS FOR
	NUMBER OF REQUIRED STREET TREES NEED TO BE CORRECTED.
	LIST TOTAL LENGTH OF EACH PROPERTY LINE SEGMENT, DIVIDE
	BY 30, THEN INDICATE THE NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED,
	ROUNDING UP FOR ANY PORTION LEFT. ACCESSWAYS ARE NOT
	DEDUCTED.

	4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE WEST STREETSCAPE DOES NOT
	MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR PLACEMENT OR NUMBER OF THE
	REQUIRED STREET TREES ALONG THE CURB. THE MEDIAN
	PLACEMENT OF TREES DO NOT MEET THE INTENT OF PROVIDING
	TREE CANOPY OVER THE PEDESTRIAN AREAS OF THE
	STREETSCAPE.

	THE RESPONSE TO COMMENT DID NOT INCLUDE THE WAIVER
	REQUEST FOR THE WEST STREETSCAPE SEGMENT AS INDICATED
	ON SHEET LP-1. 4 TREES ARE PROVIDED IN THE STREETSCAPE,
	STAFF DISCUSSED AND REQUESTS ADDING ONE ADDITIONAL TREE
	ON EACH SIDE OF THE DROPOFF CANOPY TO PROVIDE
	ADDITIONAL SHADE FOR THE SIDEWALK AREA AND ADDING THE
	REMAINING 3 TREES TO THE PLAZA PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TO
	PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PEDESTRIAN SHADE. THIS MEETS THE
	INTENT OF THE STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS.
	TREES ADDED IN QUADRILLE MEDIAN DO NOT CONTRIBUTE TO
	SHADE FOR PEDESTRIANS BUT WILL IMPROVE THE AESTHETICS.
	STAFF SUGGESTS THE USE OF BULNESIA ARBOREA TO FOLLOW
	THE PATTERN ON QUADRILLE AND ALABAMA AVENUE ADJACENT TO
	RESTORATION HARDWARE SITE.



	5. SATISFIED. FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN OPTIONS POINTS
	CANNOT BE COUNTED FOR 51% OR MORE NATIVE GROUNDCOVER,
	AS THEY ARE ALL NON-NATIVE. POINTS CANNOT BE COUNTED
	FOR 51% OR MORE NATIVE SHRUBS, AS THEY ARE ALL
	NON-NATIVE.

	6. SATISFIED. CORRECT IN THE PLANT LIST: NATCHEZ CRAPE
	MYRTLE IS NOT FLORIDA NATIVE. AGAVE AMERICANA IS NOT
	FLORIDA NATIVE.

	7. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES ON
	LANDSCAPE PLAN, ALSO LOCATIONS OF VALVES AND BACKFLOW
	PREVENTERS AND FPL TRANSFORMERS. SCREENING MUST BE
	PROVIDED. THERE ARE CONFLICTS BETWEEN UTILITIES AND
	LANDSCAPING THAT WILL HAVE TO BE RESOLVED.

	8. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-113, ADJUST LOCATIONS OF
	REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL TO ONLY SHOW UNDER HARDSCAPE
	ADJACENT TO STREET TREES. AREA FOR STRUCTURAL SOIL AND
	PLANTING AREA SHOULD BE APPROXIMATELY 14 FEET IN LENGTH
	AND 9 FEET IN WIDTH RELATIVE TO THE BACK OF CURB.
	STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL IS TO SHOW THE CONSTRUCTION
	CROSS SECTION FOR DEPTH OF 36 INCHES, AND PLANTING SOIL
	IN THE PLANTING AREA. DO NOT INCLUDE TREE GRATES UNLESS
	NEEDED FOR ADA TRAVEL WIDTH. CORRECT THE DETAIL TO
	REFLECT THIS.

	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 5/4/21:

	9. CORRECT THE TREES PROVIDED FOR MITIGATION PROVIDED
	ON THE TREE DISPOSITION SHEET TD-1 TO MATCH THE PLANT
	LIST. CATHEDRAL OAK, NOT HIGHRISE OAK.

	10. PROVIDE PRELIMINARY FDOT APPROVAL FOR ALL TREES IN
	THE FDOT RIGHT OF WAY.

	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. LOCATIONS OF
	ROYAL PALMS TO BE TRANSPLANTED WILL BE DETERMINED AT
	TIME OF PERMIT.
	2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
	3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
	WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
	SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	01-13-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	01-13-2021	Time	17:33	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	01-13-2021	Time	17:33	Sent To

Notes

2021-01-13 17:33:56	FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	561-822-1462
	PROJECT: WEST PALM POINT Z20120016
	JANUARY 13, 2021
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

	1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE
	DISPOSITION PLAN AND THE TREE INVENTORY LIST:
	? EXPLAIN WHERE THE RELOCATED ROYAL PALMS WILL BE
	PLANTED
	? #12 FICUS WOULD BE 300 SQ FT MITIGATION
	? #13 WASHINGTONIA PALM IS CATEGORY 4, SO 50 SQ FT
	MITIGATION
	? CORRECT SPELLING FOR MITIGATION REQ (SF) COLUMN

	2. LIST THE TREE SPECIES AND SQUARE FOOTAGE CREDIT FOR
	THE OPEN SPACE SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS FOR EACH
	OPEN SPACE. PERCENTAGES DO NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS
	FOR THE ENTIRE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE SO AN AREA MEETING
	THE REQUIREMENTS NEEDS TO BE DESIGNATED.

	3. PER SECTION 94-113, CALCULATIONS FOR NUMBER OF
	REQUIRED STREET TREES NEED TO BE CORRECTED. LIST TOTAL
	LENGTH OF EACH PROPERTY LINE SEGMENT, DIVIDE BY 30,
	THEN INDICATE THE NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED, ROUNDING UP
	FOR ANY PORTION LEFT. ACCESSWAYS ARE NOT DEDUCTED.

	4. THE WEST STREETSCAPE DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS
	FOR PLACEMENT OR NUMBER OF THE REQUIRED STREET TREES
	ALONG THE CURB. THE MEDIAN PLACEMENT OF TREES DO NOT
	MEET THE INTENT OF PROVIDING TREE CANOPY OVER THE
	PEDESTRIAN AREAS OF THE STREETSCAPE.


	5. FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN OPTIONS POINTS CANNOT BE
	COUNTED FOR 51% OR MORE NATIVE GROUNDCOVER, AS THEY ARE
	ALL NON-NATIVE. POINTS CANNOT BE COUNTED FOR 51% OR
	MORE NATIVE SHRUBS, AS THEY ARE ALL NON-NATIVE.

	6. CORRECT IN THE PLANT LIST: NATCHEZ CRAPE MYRTLE IS
	NOT FLORIDA NATIVE. AGAVE AMERICANA IS NOT FLORIDA
	NATIVE.

	7. SHOW LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES ON LANDSCAPE PLAN,
	ALSO LOCATIONS OF VALVES AND BACKFLOW PREVENTERS AND
	FPL TRANSFORMERS. SCREENING MUST BE PROVIDED. THERE ARE
	CONFLICTS BETWEEN UTILITIES AND LANDSCAPING THAT WILL
	HAVE TO BE RESOLVED.

	8. PER SECTION 94-113, ADJUST LOCATIONS OF REQUIRED
	STRUCTURAL SOIL TO ONLY SHOW UNDER HARDSCAPE ADJACENT
	TO STREET TREES. AREA FOR STRUCTURAL SOIL AND PLANTING
	AREA SHOULD BE APPROXIMATELY 14 FEET IN LENGTH AND 9
	FEET IN WIDTH RELATIVE TO THE BACK OF CURB. STRUCTURAL
	SOIL DETAIL IS TO SHOW THE CONSTRUCTION CROSS SECTION
	FOR DEPTH OF 36 INCHES, AND PLANTING SOIL IN THE
	PLANTING AREA. DO NOT INCLUDE TREE GRATES UNLESS NEEDED
	FOR ADA TRAVEL WIDTH. CORRECT THE DETAIL TO REFLECT
	THIS.

	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
	2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
	3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
	WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
	SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.

Review Stop	PARK		PARKING
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	POLICE		POLICE
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	12-17-2021		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	12-17-2021	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date	12-17-2021	Time	Sent To

Notes

2021-12-17 14:25:38
	PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:
	1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID
	WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE AND TYPE OF
	THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR) THAT WILL BE
	UTILIZED THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION
	SERVICE.
	2- DETAILS FOR SANITATION SERVICE (I.E. SOLID WASTE
	CONTAINER(S) TYPE, SIZE, ETC.).
	3- DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP

	MATT HEJAZI
	DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
	[email protected]
	561-822-2045

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	12-30-2020		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	12-30-2020	Time	Rev Time
Received By				Date	12-30-2020	Time	Sent To

Notes

2020-12-30 10:59:29
	PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:
	1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID
	WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE AND TYPE OF
	THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR) THAT WILL BE
	UTILIZED THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION
	SERVICE.

	2- DETAILS FOR SANITATION SERVICE (I.E. SOLID WASTE
	CONTAINER(S) TYPE, COLLECTION LOCATION, ETC.).

	3- AUTO TURN (DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE TIRES PATH) FOR
	THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER TRUCK WITH THE
	FOLLOWING SPECS:
	- TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT
	- TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT
	- TURNING RADIUS:
	- SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT
	- CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT
	- WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT

	MATT HEJAZI
	DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
	[email protected]
	561-822-2045

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	01-14-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	tward			Date	01-14-2021	Time	13:36	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tward			Date	01-14-2021	Time	13:38	Sent To

Notes

2021-01-14 13:37:46	THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
	DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
	PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
	ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
	APPLICATION PROCESSES.

	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
	PLAN APPROVAL:


	1. VERIFY THE SIGN (POSITIVE/NEGATIVE) OF THE
	CONVERSION FACTOR BETWEEN NAVD1988 AND NGVD1929
	VERTICAL DATUMS.

	2. LIST THE WATER TABLE ELEVATION AS NAVD1988 WITH
	NGVD1929 IN PARENTHESES.

	3. THE LISTED WATER TABLE ELEVATION APPEARS TOO LOW
	GIVEN THE DISTANCE TO THE LAKE WORTH LAGOON. FIELD
	VERIFY THE WET SEASON WATER TABLE ELEVATION. (CAN BE
	PROVIDED DURING ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION).

	4. PROVIDE TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS FROM CENTERLINE OF
	ADJACENT ROADS TO BUILDING FACE AND BETWEEN THE
	BUILDING AND PARKING GARAGE. SHOW AND LABEL THE RIGHT
	OF WAY LINES AND TYPICAL PROPOSED SLOPES.

	5. HOW WILL BOTTOM FLOOR OF THE PARKING GARAGE DRAIN?

	6. ADD THE DIFFERENT SPOT GRADE SYMBOLS TO THE SHEET
	LEGEND OF SHEET CG101.

	7. SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS AND HARDSCAPE
	PLANS.

	8. SHOW ADA TACTILE SURFACES FOR CURB RAMPS ON THE
	HARDSCAPE PLANS.

	9. SHOW AND CALLOUT PERIMETER PLANTER AREAS ON THE
	ENGINEERING PLANS.

	10. PERIMETER PLANTER AREA AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE
	SITE EXTENDS PAST THE CROSSWALK.

	11. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP
	CRITERIA.

	12. NOTE BLEEDERS ARE NOT PERMITTED AS PART OF THE
	CONTROL STRUCTURE USED TO SURCHARGE EXFILTRATION
	TRENCHES.

	13. SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING LIMITS FOR THE TRENCH
	CUTS ON THE PGD PLAN.

	14. INDICATE WHICH DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND SIDES WILL
	HAVE PRB'S.

	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
	ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
	BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.

	1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY
	BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.

	2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED
	WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.

	3. A SFWMD ERP MAY BE REQUIRED. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE
	PERMIT PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION.

	4. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WITH THE
	ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.

	TRACY WARD, PE
	SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
	ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	561-494-1120 (O)
	561-351-0510 (M)
	[email protected]

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	05-11-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	vnoel			Date	05-11-2021	Time	10:07	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	vnoel			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2021-05-11 11:14:56	1. NEED SIGN-OFFS FROM ALL UTILITIES FOR ANY
	ENCROACHMENT INTO THE 14 FOOT UE.
	2. IF PROPOSED TO BE ABANDONED, APPLICATION NEEDS TO BE
	MADE THROUGH ENGINEERING SERVICES AND SHOWN ON PLANS.
	3. 800 LEVEL ON SHEET A004 SHOWS ENCROACHMENT INTO FDOT
	R/W. NEED WRITTEN APPROVAL AND/OR AERIAL ENCROACHMENT
	EASEMENT FROM FDOT .
	4. DOMESTIC BACKFLOWS CANNOT BE LOCATED WITHIN
	BUILDING. FIRE DEPT. WILL NEED TO APPROVE ANY FIRE LINE
	BACKFLOWS WITHIN BUILDING.

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	01-12-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	vnoel			Date	01-12-2021	Time	07:36	Rev Time
Received By	vnoel			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2021-01-12 07:51:12	1. SURVEY NEEDS TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED.
	2. WEST PROPERTY CORNERS ARE MISSING.
	3. ADD CONVERSION TO NGVD-29.
	4. TITLE SEARCH REPORT INFORMATION IS MISSING.
	5. PROPERTY WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE RE-PLATTED.
	6. LABEL DIXIE HWY.
	7. SURVEY SHOULD BE CLASSIFIED AS BOUNDARY &
	TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY.
	8. CHECK LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR SPELLING.

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	4	Status	F	Date	12-22-2021		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	12-22-2021	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date		Time	Sent To

Notes

2021-12-22 17:13:03	TRAFFIC COMMENTS
	1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
	2) SATISFIED. KEEP DRIVEWAY/WALKWAY LEVELED
	3) NOT SATISFIED. CONFIRM OR PROVIDE CAPACITY FOR
	PUBLIC TRANSIT VEHICLES STOPS AND POTENTIALLY
	ESTABLISHING A TRANSIT HUB WITHIN THE PROPOSED
	DEVELOPMENT.
	A. SHOWCASE THE PROPOSED RIDE SHARE AREA IN THE SITE
	PLAN
	B. SHOWCASE THE PROPOSED TRANSIT STOP(S) IN THE SITE
	PLAN
	C. PROVIDE A FIGURE SHOWCASING EXISTING TRANSIT
	STOPS/FACILITIES WITHIN HALF A MILE FROM THE SITE
	D. COORDINATE WITH PALM TRAN AND PROVIDE FEEDBACK
	PERTAINING FUTURE AND/OR POTENTIAL TRANSIT ROUTES ALONG
	QUADRILLE, OKEECHOBEE AND LAKEVIEW BLVD
	4) SATISFIED. CLARIFY THE DRIVEWAY FUNCTIONALITY ON THE
	WEST SIDE OF THE DEVELOPMENT ON QUADRILLE BLVD,
	SPECIFICALLY:
	A. ARE VALET OPERATIONS CONDUCTED THERE?
	B. IS IT FOR PICK-UP, DROP-OFF OR BOTH?
	C. IS IT ACCESSIBLE TO ALL VEHICLES OR JUST
	TAXI/UBER/LYFT?
	5) NOT SATISFIED. UNLESS MONITORING IS PROPOSED, THE
	PICK-UP/DROP OFF AREA ON QUADRILLE SHOULD NOT BE
	ACCESSIBLE TO ANY VEHICLE, EXCEPT FOR TRANSIT,
	EMERGENCY AND SECURITY OPERATORS. PLEASE
	CONFIRM/ACKOWLEDGE
	6) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE MORE DETAILS OF VALET
	OPERATIONS
	A. PROPOSED VALET DROP-OFF LOCATION IS NOT FEASIBLE, AS
	THERE IS NO QUEUE STORAGE LENGTH PROVIDED. TWO QUEUED
	VEHICLES WOULD BLOCK THE GARAGE ACCESS RAMP.
	B. HIGHLIGHT/SHOWCASE VEHICLES' PATH FROM THE
	SECOND-FLOOR DROP-OFF LOCATION TO THE VALET SPOTS ON
	THE FIRST LEVEL
	7) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A VALET SERVICE ANALYSIS
	INCLUSIVE OF A NARRATIVE SHOWCASING OPERATIONAL DETAILS
	(E.G. DAYS/HOURS OF OPERATION, NUMBER OF ATTENDANTS,
	QUEUE ANALYSIS, SIGNAGE, ETC.)
	8) NOT SATISFIED. ARE THE TANDEM SPACES ON THE 7TH AND
	8TH FLOOR VALET ONLY? IF SO, THEY SHOULD BE MARKED AND
	TABULATED ACCORDINGLY
	9) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE INDICATING
	THE TOTAL NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING
	SPACES, WITH DETAILED BREAKDOWN OF EACH TYPE (I.E.
	STANDARD, COMPACT, ADA, TANDEM, BICYCLE)
	10) SATISFIED. FEC RAILROAD CROSSING UPGRADE: PROVIDE
	SIDEWALK CONNECTION ALONG OKEECHOBEE BLVD ON THE SOUTH
	SIDE. PROVIDE FDOT PERMIT OR FEEDBACK ON THE MATTER.
	11) SATISFIED. GARAGE ACCESS RAMP ON THE SOUTH SIDE
	SHOULD BE SET PERPENDICULAR TO OKEECHOBEE BLVD, IF BOTH
	INBOUND/OUTBOUND MOVEMENTS ARE CONTEMPLATED
	12) SATISFIED. CONSIDER ONE-WAY OPERATIONS AT
	DRIVEWAYS. FOR EXAMPLE: ENTRY ONLY IN THE SOUTH SIDE,
	EXIT ONLY ON THE NORTH SIDE
	13) SATISFIED. PROVIDE TWO MICRO-MOBILITY DESIGNATED
	AREAS NEARBY BUILDING ENTRANCES. WITH THE FOLLOWING
	CHARACTERISTICS:
	A. DIMENSIONS: 8' X 30'
	B. CONDUIT (2" SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO A POWER SOURCE WITH
	AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V CIRCUIT)
	14) SATISFIED. COORDINATE WITH PARKING DEPARTMENT FOR
	PARKING LOSS COMPENSATION/MITIGATION
	15) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR
	GARBAGE AND SERVICE VEHICLES.
	16) NOT SATISFIED. PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS' WIDTH IS
	EXCESSIVE AND UNSAFE. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 5 FEET WIDE
	PEDESTRIAN REFUGE ISLAND BETWEEN SERVICE DRIVE AND
	GARAGE ACCESS/ENTRY
	17) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE BICYCLE RACKS NEARBY
	BUILDING ENTRANCE(S) AND DISTINCTIVELY MARK THEM ON
	SITE PLANS
	18) NOT SATISFIED. UNLESS AUTOTURN ANALYSIS PROVES
	PARKING MANEUVERABILITY, REMOVE THE LAST TWO PARKING
	STALLS AT THE DEAD-END ON THE NINTH FLOOR OF THE
	GARAGE.
	19) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. COORDINATE WITH PLANNING
	DEPARTMENT FOR TDM MITIGATION MEASUREMENTS. PROVIDEA
	FINAL AND MUTUALLY AGREED LIST OF TDM MEASUREMENTS
	20) NOT SATISFIED. HOW IS ACCESS TO THE GARAGE SERVICE
	DRIVE INDICATED SIGNAGE-WISE AND HOW IS IT CONTROLLED?

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	05-05-2021		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	05-05-2021	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date		Time	Sent To

Notes

2021-05-05 13:38:20	TRAFFIC COMMENTS
	1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
	2) SATISFIED. KEEP DRIVEWAY/WALKWAY LEVELED
	3) NOT SATISFIED. CONFIRM OR PROVIDE CAPACITY FOR
	PUBLIC TRANSIT VEHICLES STOPS AND POTENTIALLY
	ESTABLISHING A TRANSIT HUB WITHIN THE PROPOSED
	DEVELOPMENT.
	A. SHOWCASE THE PROPOSED RIDE SHARE AREA IN THE SITE
	PLAN
	B. SHOWCASE THE PROPOSED TRANSIT STOP(S) IN THE SITE
	PLAN
	C. PROVIDE A FIGURE SHOWCASING EXISTING TRANSIT
	STOPS/FACILITIES WITHIN HALF A MILE FROM THE SITE
	D. COORDINATE WITH PALM TRAN AND PROVIDE FEEDBACK
	PERTAINING FUTURE AND/OR POTENTIAL TRANSIT ROUTES ALONG
	QUADRILLE, OKEECHOBEE AND LAKEVIEW BLVD
	4) SATISFIED. CLARIFY THE DRIVEWAY FUNCTIONALITY ON THE
	WEST SIDE OF THE DEVELOPMENT ON QUADRILLE BLVD,
	SPECIFICALLY:
	A. ARE VALET OPERATIONS CONDUCTED THERE?
	B. IS IT FOR PICK-UP, DROP-OFF OR BOTH?
	C. IS IT ACCESSIBLE TO ALL VEHICLES OR JUST
	TAXI/UBER/LYFT?
	5) NOT SATISFIED. UNLESS MONITORING IS PROPOSED, THE
	PICK-UP/DROP OFF AREA ON QUADRILLE SHOULD NOT BE
	ACCESSIBLE TO ANY VEHICLE, EXCEPT FOR TRANSIT,
	EMERGENCY AND SECURITY OPERATORS.
	6) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE MORE DETAILS OF VALET
	OPERATIONS
	A. PROPOSED VALET DROP-OFF LOCATION IS NOT FEASIBLE, AS
	THERE IS NO QUEUE STORAGE LENGTH PROVIDED. TWO QUEUED
	VEHICLES WOULD BLOCK THE GARAGE ACCESS RAMP.
	B. HIGHLIGHT/SHOWCASE VEHICLES? PATH FROM THE SECOND
	FLOOR DROP-OFF LOCATION TO THE VALET SPOTS ON THE FIRST
	LEVEL
	7) NOT SATISFIED. FEC RAILROAD CROSSING UPGRADE:
	PROVIDE SIDEWALK CONNECTION ALONG OKEECHOBEE BLVD ON
	THE SOUTH SIDE. PROVIDE FDOT PERMIT OR FEEDBACK ON THE
	MATTER.
	8) SATISFIED. GARAGE ACCESS RAMP ON THE SOUTH SIDE
	SHOULD BE SET PERPENDICULAR TO OKEECHOBEE BLVD, IF BOTH
	INBOUND/OUTBOUND MOVEMENTS ARE CONTEMPLATED
	9) SATISFIED. CONSIDER ONE-WAY OPERATIONS AT DRIVEWAYS.
	FOR EXAMPLE: ENTRY ONLY IN THE SOUTH SIDE, EXIT ONLY ON
	THE NORTH SIDE
	10) SATISFIED. PROVIDE TWO MICRO-MOBILITY DESIGNATED
	AREAS NEARBY BUILDING ENTRANCES. WITH THE FOLLOWING
	CHARACTERISTICS:
	A. DIMENSIONS: 8 X 20 FEET
	B. CONDUIT (2 FEET SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO A POWER SOURCE
	WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V CIRCUIT)
	11) SATISFIED. COORDINATE WITH PARKING DEPARTMENT FOR
	PARKING LOSS COMPENSATION/MITIGATION
	12) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR
	GARBAGE AND SERVICE VEHICLES.
	13) NOT SATISFIED. PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS? WIDTH IS
	EXCESSIVE AND UNSAFE. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 5 FEET WIDE
	PEDESTRIAN REFUGE ISLAND BETWEEN SERVICE DRIVE AND
	GARAGE ACCESS/ENTRY
	14) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE BICYCLE RACKS NEARBY
	BUILDING ENTRANCE(S) AND DISTINCTIVELY MARK THEM ON
	SITE PLANS
	15) NOT SATISFIED. UNLESS AUTOTURN ANALYSIS PROVES
	PARKING MANEUVERABILITY, REMOVE THE LAST TWO PARKING
	STALLS AT THE DEAD-END ON THE NINTH FLOOR OF THE
	GARAGE.
	16) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. COORDINATE WITH PLANNING
	DEPARTMENT FOR TDM MITIGATION MEASUREMENTS. A FINAL AND
	MUTUALLY AGREED LIST OF TDM MEASUREMENTS SHALL BE
	PROVIDED IN ORDER TO PASS THE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
	REVIEW.

	VALERIO ORICCHIO
	CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
	561-494-1092
	[email protected]

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	03-31-2021		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	03-31-2021	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date		Time	Sent To

Notes

2021-03-31 13:18:32

	VALERIO ORICCHIO
	CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
	561-494-1092
	[email protected]

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	01-14-2021		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	01-14-2021	Time	Rev Time
Received By				Date		Time	Sent To

Notes

2021-01-14 11:45:07	TRAFFIC COMMENTS

	1) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
	2) KEEP DRIVEWAY/WALKWAY LEVELED
	3) CONFIRM OR PROVIDE CAPACITY FOR PUBLIC TRANSIT
	VEHICLES STOPS AND POTENTIALLY ESTABLISHING A TRANSIT
	HUB WITHIN THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
	4) CLARIFY THE DRIVEWAY FUNCTIONALITY ON THE WEST SIDE
	OF THE DEVELOPMENT ON QUADRILLE BLVD, SPECIFICALLY:
	4A. ARE VALET OPERATIONS CONDUCTED THERE?
	4B. IS IT FOR PICK-UP, DROP-OFF OR BOTH?
	4C. IS IT ACCESSIBLE TO ALL VEHICLES OR JUST
	TAXI/UBER/LYFT?
	5) PROVIDE MORE DETAILS OF VALET OPERATIONS, IF ANY
	6) FEC RAILROAD CROSSING UPGRADE: PROVIDE SIDEWALK
	CONNECTION ALONG OKEECHOBEE BLVD ON THE SOUTH SIDE
	7) GARAGE ACCESS RAMP ON THE SOUTH SIDE SHOULD BE SET
	PERPENDICULAR TO OKEECHOBEE BLVD, IF BOTH
	INBOUND/OUTBOUND MOVEMENTS ARE CONTEMPLATED
	8) CONSIDER ONE-WAY OPERATIONS AT DRIVEWAYS. FOR
	EXAMPLE: ENTRY ONLY IN THE SOUTH SIDE, EXIT ONLY ON THE
	NORTH SIDE
	9) PROVIDE TWO MICRO-MOBILITY DESIGNATED AREAS NEARBY
	BUILDING ENTRANCES. WITH THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTICS:
	9A. DIMENSIONS: 8' X 20'
	9B. CONDUIT (2' SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO A POWER SOURCE WITH
	AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V CIRCUIT)
	10) CORDINATE WITH PARKING DEPARTMENT FOR PARKING LOSS
	COMPENSATION/MITIGATION
	11) CORDINATE WITH PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR TDM
	MITIGATION MEASUREMENTS

	VALERIO ORICCHIO
	CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
	561-494-1092
	[email protected]

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	4	Status	F	Date	12-21-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	aaponte			Date	12-21-2021	Time	12:32	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	aaponte			Date	12-16-2021	Time	12:32	Sent To

Notes

2021-12-21 12:43:04	1. TREES ALONG LAKEVIEW AVE AND OKEECHOBEE AVE SHALL BE
	MOVED OUTSIDE THE PARKING GARAGE LINE OF SIGHT. A
	MINIMUM OF 12 FEET MULTIPURPOSE PATH SHALL BE
	MAINTAINED. SOME ADJUSTMENT WILL BE NEEDED ON THE
	PROPOSED LANDSCAPE DESIGN ADJACENT TO THE OFFICE TOWER
	TO ACCOMMODATE THE LINE OF TREES.
	2. SIDEWALK LEVEL SHALL BE MAINTAINED ACROSS ALL THE
	DRIVEWAYS. PLEASE AJUST THE CIVIL DESIGN TO ENSURE THE
	GRADE ELEVATION IS MAINTAINED.
	3. PARKING GATE IS LOCATED AT THE 2ND LEVEL. WHAT IS
	THE PROPOSAL FOR RETAIL AND VALET PARKING? STAFF
	RECOMMENDS THE GATE TO BE INSTALLED AT THE 3RD LEVEL TO
	ALLOW PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS OR EXPLAIN INTENDED
	OPERATION.
	4. HOW IS THE 2ND LEVEL OFFICE ALONG THE PASEO ACCESSED
	FROM THE ELEVATOR? PLEASE VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH
	EMERGENCY EXIT REQUIREMENTS.
	5. VALET OPERATION DOES NOT PROVIDE A BY-PASS LANE
	CREATING A POSSIBLE BACK UP FOR CARS. SOME REDESIGN MAY
	BE NEEDED.
	6. ALL TANDEM PARKING SPACES SHALL BE MANAGED BY THE
	VALET OPERATION. PLEASE LABEL ACCORDINGLY.
	7. PLEASE LABEL THE LOCATION OF ALL CAR SHARE AND RIDE
	SHARE SPACES REQUIRED BY THE TDM STRATEGIES.
	8. PLEASE CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN SPACE
	REQUIREMENTS FOR VEGETATION AND TREE CANOPY. THE
	CALCULATION CAN BE DONE OVER A MINIMUM AREA TO COMPLY
	WITH THE PERCENTAGE AND NOT THE LARGER OPEN SPACE
	PROVIDED. (SEE LANDSCAPE COMMENTS)
	9. BUILDING FOOTPRINT PRIVIDED ON SHEET A004 DOES NOT
	MATCH THE WAIVER REQUEST, PLEASE CONFIRM WHAT IS THE
	CORRECT NUMBER.
	10. PLEASE PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT TO CALCULATE THE PROVIDED
	ACTIVE USES AT GROUND FLOOR AND ABOVE TO CONFIRM WAIVER
	REQUEST.
	FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA
	APONTE AT 561-822-1439.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	07-01-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	aaponte			Date	07-01-2021	Time	11:59	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	aaponte			Date	06-02-2021	Time	13:02	Sent To

Notes

2021-07-01 12:00:14	COMMENTS TO 6/2/21 SET
	1. NOT SATISFIED. APPLICANT NEEDS TO SUBMIT A REPORT
	WITH THE REQUIRED CALCULATIONS FOR THE CONVERSION OF
	USES NECESSARY TO ACCOUNT FOR THE OFFICE SQUARE FOOTAGE
	ABOVE THE AVAILABLE POOL. PREVIOUS COMMENT: THE PROJECT
	EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE CURRENTLY ALLOCATED
	FOR OFFICE IN THE DRI CAPACITY TABLE. BASED ON THE
	LATEST NUMBERS, A CONVERSION FROM OTHER CATEGORY WOULD
	BE NEEDED TO ALLOW 62,833 SF OF ADDITIONAL OFFICE
	SPACE. PLEASE SUBMIT CONVERSION ANALYSIS ACCORDING TO
	ORDINANCE 4412-12.-PREVIOUS COMMENT: PLEASE PROVIDE A
	GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATION FOR EACH USE TO
	DETERMINE THE NEED FOR CONVERSION CAPACITY FROM THE
	CITYPLACE DRI. CURRENTLY THERE IS ONLY 383,429 SF OF
	OFFICE SPACE, AND 32,337 SF OR RETAIL AVAILABLE IN THE
	POOL. IT SEEMS THE GBA OF PROPOSED OFFICE MAY EXCEED
	THE AVAILABLE SF NECESSITATING A SF CONVERSION.
	2. SATISFIED.- PLEASE REVIEW ORDINANCE NO. 4412-12 AND
	PROVIDE CONFIRMATION OF COMPLIANCE FOR ALL APPLICABLE
	ITEMS.
	3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PASSAGEWAY SHALL COMPLY WITH
	PUBLIC OPEN SPACE DESIGN STANDARDS IN ORDER TO BE
	COUNTED AS ACTIVE USES, SEATING, VEGETATION AND TREE
	CANOPY SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE PASSAGE WAY. PREVIOUS
	COMMENTS: STAFF UNDERSTAND WAIVERS ARE REQUESTED.
	PLEASE PROVIDE SCHEMATIC DRAWING INDICATING THE
	COMPLIANCE AT GROUND FLOOR AND THE WAIVERS REQUESTED
	FOR FLOORS 2ND-5TH. IF THE AREA OF THE PASEO MEETS THE
	PUBLIC OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS, IT CAN BE COUNTED AS
	ACTIVE USE AS IT IS ADJACENT TO ACTIVE USES ON BOTH
	SIDES.- PREVIOUS COMMENT: PLEASE PROVIDE GRAPHIC
	INFORMATION TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE ACTIVE
	USE REQUIREMENTS.
	4. NOT SATISFIED. SOME SUGGESTIONS TO REDUCE THE NUMBER
	OF WAIVERS REQUESTED:
	A. AS IT SEEMS THE PROPOSED VALET PARKING SPACES ON THE
	GROUND FLOOR ARE NOT USABLE (DUE TO CIRCULATION
	PATTERNS) THE GROUND FLOOR ACTIVE USE ALONG DIXIE HWAY
	COULD BE MODIFIED TO MEET THE MINIMUM DEPTH REQUIRED.
	B. SATISFIED WITH HORIZONTAL VARIATION PROVIDED IN THE
	GARAGE. PREVIOUS COMMENT: PLANAR BREAKS COULD BE
	MEASURED HORIZONTALLY WITH THE VARIATION ON THE
	BUILDING PLANE OF EACH PARKING LEVEL.
	C. NOT SATISFIED: PLEASE PROVIDE ALTERNATIVE LOCATION
	FOR THE REQUIRED TREES. PREVIOUS COMMENT: CONSIDERING
	THE CANOPY AT THE MAIN ENTRANCE IS AT 33? IN HEIGHT,
	TREES MAY BE INSTALLED ALONG THE CURB TO COMPLY WITH
	TREE PLANTING REQUIREMENT.
	PREVIOUS COMMENT: PROJECT IS REQUESTING 22 DIFFERENT
	WAIVERS FROM REGULATIONS. PLEASE FURTHER STUDY OPTIONS
	TO COMPLY WITH CODE REQUIREMENTS OR REDUCE THE WAIVER
	REQUEST. SOME OF THE WAIVERS THAT CAN BE REDUCED
	INCLUDE:
	A. SATISFIED-PORTE COCHERE. CONSIDERING THE DROP-OFF
	AREA ON QUADRILLE CANNOT MEET THE PORTE COCHERE
	REQUIREMENTS STAFF RECOMMENDS UTILIZING A REGULAR
	ON-STREET DROP-OFF.
	B. SATISFIED-TOWER AND GARAGE SEPARATION ARE NOT
	APPLICABLE TO THIS DISTRICT.
	5. SATISFIED. WAIVER REQUESTED. PLEASE PROVIDE SOME
	SECTIONS TO INDICATE THE RELATION BETWEEN THE OFFICE
	TOWER LEVELS AND THE GARAGE LEVELS. IF THE OFFICE
	LEVELS ARE USED, GARAGE LEVELS 8,9 AND 10 SEEM TO
	EXCEED TO MAXIMUM FOOTPRINT (TOWER LEVELS 6 AND 7).THE
	WAIVER REQUEST SHOULD BE FOR THOSE TWO FLOORS TO EXCEED
	THE MAXIMUM 55% BUILDING FOOTPRINT ALLOWED? PREVIOUS
	COMMENT: PROJECT EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM BUILDING FOOTPRINT
	ALLOWED AT THE 6TH AND 7TH STORY (55%) AND ABOVE 8TH
	STORY (50%) DUE TO THE PARKING GOING UP 10 STORIES.
	JUSTIFICATION LIST THE WAIVER REQUEST TO EXCEED THE
	MAXIMUM BUILDING FOOTPRINT FROM 6TH TO 24TH FLOOR.
	PLEASE CLARIFY WHAT IS THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT PROVIDED
	ABOVE THE 10TH LEVEL. THE PROJECT IS ALLOWED TO EXCEED
	MAXIMUM BUILDING FOOTPRINTS ABOVE THE 5TH FLOOR, BUT IN
	COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONDITIONAL SETBACK, WHICH IS NOT
	PROVIDED AT THIS POINT.
	6. SATISFIED- PLEASE INDICATE LOCATION OF 20
	CARPOOL/VANPOOL AND 10 CAR SHARE STATION PROPOSED AS
	PART OF THE TDM STRATEGIES TO REACH MAXIMUM PARKING
	ALLOWED. PROPOSED PARKING EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED.
	MAXIMUM PARKING ALLOWED FOR THE PROJECT IS:
	SOFT MAXIMUM = 398,590 SF AT1.5/1,000 = 598 SPACES
	ADDITIONAL .75/1,000 WITH CONTRIBUTION TO TRANSIT = 299
	SPACES
	ADDITIONAL WITH TDM STRATEGIES = 299 SPACES
	TOTAL ALLOWED = 1,196 SPACES ? PARKING PROPOSED ON
	6/2/21 SUBMITTAL IS 1,195
	PARKING PROPOSES ON APRIL 23, 21 VERSION = 1,213 SPACES
	TO INCREASE FROM THE SOFT MAXIMUM THE PROJECT CAN:
	A. CONTRIBUTE TO THE TRANSIT OPERATION FUND (EXACT
	AMOUNT TO BE CALCULATED). THAT WILL ALLOW 299
	ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES.
	B. THE ADDITIONAL SPACES REQUESTED UP TO THE HARD
	MAXIMUM WOULD REQUIRE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TDM
	STRATEGIES. PLEASE IDENTIFY WHICH TDM STRATEGIES THE
	PROJECT IS GOING TO IMPLEMENT.

	7. NOT SATISFIED . AT LEAST CURB CUT ON LAKEVIEW CAN BE
	REDUCED TO 12? WIDE TRAVEL LANES. WAIVER REQUESTED.
	REFUGE AREA MENTIONED IN THE RESPONSE LETTER IS NOT
	SHOWN IN THE DRAWINGS. PREVIOUS COMMENT: PROPOSED CURB
	CUT EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM 25 FEET ALLOWED. FURTHER
	DISCUSSION NECESSARY TO DETERMINE IF THE SERVICE DRIVE
	CAN BE REDUCED, OR IF THERE ARE ANY MEASURES TO
	MITIGATE THE IMPACT ON PEDESTRIANS.
	8. SATISFIED. CONDITION TO BE INCLUDED IN APPROVAL-
	SIDEWALK ELEVATION SHALL BE MAINTAINED ACROSS THE
	DRIVEWAY.
	9. SATISFIED- FDOT REQUIRES A PUBLIC PURPOSE LEASE
	REQUEST FOR THE DROP-OFF AREA INITIATED BY CITY OR CRA.
	PLEASE PROVIDE PRE-APPROVAL LETTER FROM FDOT TO CONFIRM
	THEY WILL ACCEPT THE DROP OFF AREA ON QUADRILLE BLVD
	AND THE LOCATION OF THE CURB CUTS.-PREVIOUS COMMENT:
	TPS LETTER FROM COUNTY MENTIONS THE POSSIBLE NEED FOR
	DECELERATION LANES TO ACCESS GARAGE. PLEASE PROVIDE A
	PRE-DETERMINATION LETTER FROM FDOT CONFIRMING THE
	AGENCY APPROVAL FOR THE PROPOSED SIDE PLAN (DRIVEWAYS,
	TREES ETC.)
	10. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE NARRATIVE ON THE CURB
	SIDE MANAGEMENT OF ON-STREET DROP OFF/PICK UP AREA
	PROPOSED ON QUADRILLE BLVD.- PREVIOUS COMMENT: PLEASE
	PROVIDE FOR A CURB SIDE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND A FREIGHT
	DELIVERY MANAGEMENT PLAN.
	11. SATISFIED. PROPOSED VALET LOCATION IS NOT
	FUNCTIONAL, THE VALET OPERATION IS BLOCKING THE TRAVEL
	LANES. A SEPARATE AREA FOR STACKING IS NEEDED. PLEASE
	INDICATE THE TRAVEL PATHS FOR CARS RECEIVED AT THE 2ND
	FLOOR VALET TO THE GROUND FLOOR VALET PARKING AREA.
	VALET CARS SHOULD NOT CIRCULATE IN THE PUBLIC ROW. ?
	PREVIOUS COMMENT: PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION REGARDING
	THE OPERATION OF THE VALET SERVICE FOR THE BUILDING.
	PLEASE IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF THE VALET PARKING
	DROP-OFF /PICK UP AREA INSIDE THE GARAGE.
	12. TO BE INCLUDED AS A CONDITON OF APPROVAL- DUE TO
	THE PROPOSAL TO INCLUDE TANDEM PARKING SPACES, VALET
	SERVICE WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT. A RESTRICTIVE
	COVENANT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT.

	13. STAFF STILL RECOMMENDS MORE REALISTIC RENDERINGS BE
	PROVIDED FOR STAFF EVALUATION AND PUBLIC MEETINGS.
	STAFF RECOMMENDS MORE REALISTIC RENDERINGS FOR THE PB
	AND CITY COMMISSION MEETING. CAN THE CONCRETE PARAPET
	THAT CREATES THE ILLUSION OF SLAB THICKNESS BE TALLER
	TO FURTHER SCREEN THE CARS FROM VIEW? WHAT ABOUT SOME
	VEGETATION IN SOME OF THE SLAB PROJECTIONS THAT
	COMPLEMENT THE ART INSTALLATION AND HELP SCREEN THE
	CARS?? PREVIOUS COMMENT: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SHALL
	BE PROVIDED REGARDING THE PROPOSED DESIGN OF THE
	PARKING GARAGE. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPLICANT TO PROVIDE
	DETAILED SECTIONS TO FULLY EXPLAIN THE SPECIAL DESIGN
	OF THE GARAGE SLABS THAT WILL JUSTIFY THE LACK OF
	ACTIVE USES. REALISTIC RENDERING IMAGES ARE ALSO
	RECOMMENDED TO FULLY DEPICT THE IMAGE OF THE GARAGE AND
	ALLOW A COMPLETE UNDERSTANDING OF THE GARAGE IMPACT ON
	THE SURROUNDING. RENDERINGS SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM ALL
	THE DIFFERENT VIEW POINTS OF THE GARAGE (DIXIE,
	LAKEVIEW, OKEECHOBEE) AND FROM STREET LEVEL PERSPECTIVE
	AS WELL AS FROM UPPER LEVELS FROM SURROUNDING
	BUILDINGS.
	PLANS INDICATE SOME OF THE PARKING SPACES AT THE EDGE
	OF THE SLAB, ARE THE CARS VISIBLE FROM OUTSIDE?
	14. NOT SATISFIED. SOME OF THE GARAGE SLABS ENCROACH
	INTO THE MINIMUM REQUIRED SETBACKS. SECTION IN A513
	DOES NOT SEEM TO MATCH FLOOR PLANS BUT SEEMS TO
	INDICATE SOME ADDITIONAL SETBACK ABOVE FLOOR 6TH BEYOND
	THE MINIMUM REQUIRED. PLEASE INDICATE THE MINIMUM
	SETBACK LINE AND THE CONDITIONAL SETBACK FOR PARKING
	USES TO DETERMINE THE EXTENT OF THE WAIVER IN EACH
	PARKING LEVEL. PREVIOUS COMMENT: PLEASE INDICATE THE
	MINIMUM SETBACK IN THE GARAGE SECTIONS TO IDENTIFY THE
	EXTEND OF THE ENCROACHMENTS INDICATED IN THE FLOOR
	PLANS. ARE THE ENCROACHMENTS PROPOSED ARCHITECTURAL
	FEATURES?
	15. NOT SATISFIED. IF THE PROJECT INTENDS TO ASK FOR A
	WAIVER, THE REQUIRED TREES SHALL BE LOCATED ON OTHER
	PARTS OF THE PROJECT OR A MITIGATION FEE PAID INTO THE
	TREE FUND. SOME ADDITIONAL TREES CAN BE INSTALLED NORTH
	AND SOUTH OF THE CANOPY TO BRING THE PROJECT CLOSER
	INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENT. PLEASE SUGGEST
	WHERE THE REMAINING TREES CAN BE LOCATION AROUND THE
	PROJECT. PREVIOUS COMMENT: STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED
	ALONG THE QUADRILLE BOULEVARD FRONTAGE EVERY 30 FEET.
	16. SATISFIED. SIDEWALK ALONG THE QUADRILLE FRONTAGE IS
	10 FEET AT ITS NARROWEST POINT. PREVIOUS COMMENT:
	SIDEWALK ALONG QUADRILLE BOULEVARD BY THE BUILDING
	ENTRANCE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET IN WIDTH.
	17. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A FA?ADE DETAIL DEPICTING
	THE TREATMENT OF THE FA?ADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE UTILITY
	ELEMENTS. ALSO PLEASE CLARIFY HOW IS THE ACCESS TO THE
	FIRE BACKFLOW. - PREVIOUS COMMENT: ALL BACKFLOW
	PREVENTORS AND ABOVE GROUND UTILITY CONNECTIONS AT THE
	GROUND LEVEL NEED TO BE SCREENED FROM VIEW. FURTHER
	DISCUSSION IS NECESSARY TO DETERMINE THE MOST
	APPROPRIATE LOCATION. LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS AND SITE PLAN
	DRAWINGS SHALL REFLECT THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF SUCH
	EQUIPMENT.
	18. SATISFIED. SIGNAGE TO BE SUBMITTED - A COMPLETE
	SIGNAGE PACKET SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL AS PART
	OF THE LEVEL III SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS BY THE CITY
	COMMISSION.
	19. SATISFIED. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THE DESIGNATED 798
	SF ROOM IS SUFFICIENT TO ACCOMMODATE THE 120 BIKE
	PARKING SPACES. PREVIOUS COMMENT. BIKE PARKING REQUIRED
	IS 120 SPACES. - PREVIOUS COMMENT: THE BIKE STORAGE
	INDICATED ON THE GROUND FLOOR ALONG OKEECHOBEE BLVD
	DOES NOT SEEM ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE THE 120 BIKE SPACES
	REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT (1/10 PARKING SPACES)
	20. NOT SATISFIED. TO BE INCLUDED AS A CONDITION OF
	APPROVAL. SHOWERS MAY BE DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOUT THE
	BUILDING, BUT IT SHALL BE ENSURED THAT ALL TENANTS HAVE
	ACCESS TO A SHOWER FACILITY (13 SHOWERS REQUIRED).
	SHEET A112 WAS NOT INCLUDED IN SUBMITTED SET. BASED ON
	THE 382,211 SF OF NET OFFICE SPACE, THE PROJECT IS
	REQUIRED TO PROVIDE 13 SHOWERS AND CHANGING FACILITIES.
	SHOWERS SHALL BE IN AREAS ACCESSIBLE TO ALL TENANTS.
	PLEASE INDICATE PRELIMINARY LOCATION FOR SITE PLAN
	APPROVAL PROCESS- PREVIOUS COMMENT: PLEASE INDICATE THE
	LOCATION OF THE SHOWER AND CHANGING ROOMS REQUIRED FOR
	THE PROJECT (1 SHOWER AND CHANGING /30,000 SF OF
	OFFICE).
	21. SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE A NOTE CALLING OUT THE
	NON-REFLECTIVE NATURE OF THE GLASS IN THE FA?ADE. -
	PLEASE CONFIRM THE PROPOSED GLASS IS NOT A REFLECTIVE
	GLASS TO CAUSE IMPACT OF DRIVERS.
	22. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE LAY OUT THE LINE OF SIGHT
	MEETING THE FDOT REQUIREMENTS TO CONFIRM THE LOCATION
	OF THE TREES INDICATED IN THE DRAWINGS MEET FDOT
	REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE OBTAIN A PRE-APPROVAL LETTER FROM
	FDOT TO CONFIRM THEY WILL ALLOW THE PROPOSED PLACEMENT
	OF TREES ALONG THE CURB LINE. - PLEASE CONFIRM FDOT HAS
	APPROVED THE LOCATIONS OF THE PROPOSED TREES ALONG THE
	CURB.
	23. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. WHAT ARE THE FDOT STANDARDS
	FOR A PEDESTRIAN CROSSING? PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS SHOULD
	HAVE THERMOPLASTIC ZEBRA PATTERN AND ADA RAMPS. ?
	PREVIOUS COMMENT: PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM
	COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISION OF PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS
	AT ALL INTERSECTIONS.
	24. NOT SATISFIED. 12 BIKE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE
	PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT, CLOSE TO BUILDING
	ENTRANCE AND RETAIL ENTRANCES. BIKE PARKING FOR THE
	GENERAL PUBLIC SHALL BE INSTALLED AROUND THE PROJECT
	WITHIN THE PUBLIC REALM. PLEASE PROVIDE 1 BIKE SPACE
	PER EVERY 100 FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE. THE PROVIDED
	BIKE PARKING INSIDE THE BUILDING IS FOR THE BUILDING
	TENANTS. - PREVIOUS COMMENT: PUBLIC BIKE RACKS ARE
	REQUIRED ALONG THE STREET FRONTAGE AT A RATIO OF ONE
	PARKING SPACE/100 LINEAR FEET OF FRONTAGE.
	25. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. TO BE CONFIRMED DURING
	BUILDING PERMIT. ANY CHANGES IN GRADE ELEVATION BETWEEN
	THE SIDEWALK AND THE FINISHED FLOOR SHALL BE ABSORBED
	INSIDE THE BUILDING. ? PREVIOUS COMMENT: PLEASE PROVIDE
	STREET SECTIONS INCLUDING GROUND FLOOR ELEVATIONS TO
	CONFIRM EXISTING STREET AND SIDEWALK ELEVATIONS CAN BE
	MET WITH THE NEW PROJECT.
	26. SATISFIED. A MAXIMUM OF 30 % OF THE PARKING SPACES
	CAN BE COMPACT SPACES. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO
	CONFIRM COMPLIANCE. ? PREVIOUS COMMENT: PLEASE CONFIRM
	YOU DO NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE COMPACT PARKING
	SPACES FOR THE PROJECT.
	27. THE PARKING PROJECTIONS IN SOME OF THE UPPER FLOORS
	ENCROACH INTO THE MINIMUM SETBACK. PLEASE ADJUST. A
	MAXIMUM 2 FEET FOR ARCHITECTURAL ENCROACHMENT IS
	ALLOWED.
	FOR RESUBMITTAL, PLEASE SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF ALL
	DRAWINGS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION AND ONE CD WITH
	ELECTRONIC COPIES OF ALL DOCUMENTS AND DRAWINGS. PLEASE
	INCLUDE A RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH OF THE
	COMMENTS.
	28. IF THE GROUDN FLOOR PARKING IS GOING TO BE USED BY
	EMPLOYEES, PLEASE INDICATE THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO THE
	PARKING AREA.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	05-17-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	aaponte			Date	05-17-2021	Time	16:10	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	aaponte			Date	04-23-2021	Time	16:08	Sent To

Notes

2021-05-17 16:10:14	COMMENTS TO 4/23/21 SET
	1. NOT SATISFIED. THE PROJECT EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM
	SQUARE FOOTAGE CURRENTLY ALLOCATED FOR OFFICE IN THE
	DRI CAPACITY TABLE. BASED ON THE LATEST NUMBERS, A
	CONVERSION FROM OTHER CATEGORY WOULD BE NEEDED TO ALLOW
	62,833 SF OF ADDITIONAL OFFICE SPACE. PLEASE SUBMIT
	CONVERSION ANALYSIS ACCORDING TO ORDINANCE
	4412-12.-PREVIOUS COMMENT: PLEASE PROVIDE A GROSS
	SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATION FOR EACH USE TO DETERMINE
	THE NEED FOR CONVERSION CAPACITY FROM THE CITYPLACE
	DRI. CURRENTLY THERE IS ONLY 383,429 SF OF OFFICE
	SPACE, AND 32,337 SF OR RETAIL AVAILABLE IN THE POOL.
	IT SEEMS THE GBA OF PROPOSED OFFICE MAY EXCEED THE
	AVAILABLE SF NECESSITATING A SF CONVERSION.
	2. SATISFIED.- PLEASE REVIEW ORDINANCE NO. 4412-12 AND
	PROVIDE CONFIRMATION OF COMPLIANCE FOR ALL APPLICABLE
	ITEMS.
	3. NOT SATISFIED. STAFF UNDERSTAND WAIVERS ARE
	REQUESTED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCHEMATIC DRAWING INDICATING
	THE COMPLIANCE AT GROUND FLOOR AND THE WAIVERS
	REQUESTED FOR FLOORS 2ND-5TH. IF THE AREA OF THE PASEO
	MEETS THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS, IT CAN BE
	COUNTED AS ACTIVE USE AS IT IS ADJACENT TO ACTIVE USES
	ON BOTH SIDES.- PREVIOUS COMMENT: PLEASE PROVIDE
	GRAPHIC INFORMATION TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENTS.
	4. NOT SATISFIED. SOME SUGGESTIONS TO REDUCE THE NUMBER
	OF WAIVERS REQUESTED:
	A. AS IT SEEMS THE PROPOSED VALET PARKING SPACES ON THE
	GROUND FLOOR ARE NOT USABLE (DUE TO CIRCULATION
	PATTERNS) THE GROUND FLOOR ACTIVE USE ALONG DIXIE HWAY
	COULD BE MODIFIED TO MEET THE MINIMUM DEPTH REQUIRED.
	B. PLANAR BREAKS COULD BE MEASURED HORIZONTALLY WITH
	THE VARIATION ON THE BUILDING PLANE OF EACH PARKING
	LEVEL.
	C. CONSIDERING THE CANOPY AT THE MAIN ENTRANCE IS AT
	33? IN HEIGHT, TREES MAY BE INSTALLED ALONG THE CURB TO
	COMPLY WITH TREE PLANTING REQUIREMENT.
	PREVIOUS COMMENT: PROJECT IS REQUESTING 22 DIFFERENT
	WAIVERS FROM REGULATIONS. PLEASE FURTHER STUDY OPTIONS
	TO COMPLY WITH CODE REQUIREMENTS OR REDUCE THE WAIVER
	REQUEST. SOME OF THE WAIVERS THAT CAN BE REDUCED
	INCLUDE:
	A. SATISFIED-PORTE COCHERE. CONSIDERING THE DROP-OFF
	AREA ON QUADRILLE CANNOT MEET THE PORTE COCHERE
	REQUIREMENTS STAFF RECOMMENDS UTILIZING A REGULAR
	ON-STREET DROP-OFF.
	B. SATISFIED-TOWER AND GARAGE SEPARATION ARE NOT
	APPLICABLE TO THIS DISTRICT.
	5. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SOME SECTIONS TO
	INDICATE THE RELATION BETWEEN THE OFFICE TOWER LEVELS
	AND THE GARAGE LEVELS. IF THE OFFICE LEVELS ARE USED,
	GARAGE LEVELS 8,9 AND 10 SEEM TO EXCEED TO MAXIMUM
	FOOTPRINT (TOWER LEVELS 6 AND 7).THE WAIVER REQUEST
	SHOULD BE FOR THOSE TWO FLOORS TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM
	55% BUILDING FOOTPRINT ALLOWED? PREVIOUS COMMENT:
	PROJECT EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM BUILDING FOOTPRINT ALLOWED
	AT THE 6TH AND 7TH STORY (55%) AND ABOVE 8TH STORY
	(50%) DUE TO THE PARKING GOING UP 10 STORIES.
	JUSTIFICATION LIST THE WAIVER REQUEST TO EXCEED THE
	MAXIMUM BUILDING FOOTPRINT FROM 6TH TO 24TH FLOOR.
	PLEASE CLARIFY WHAT IS THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT PROVIDED
	ABOVE THE 10TH LEVEL. THE PROJECT IS ALLOWED TO EXCEED
	MAXIMUM BUILDING FOOTPRINTS ABOVE THE 5TH FLOOR, BUT IN
	COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONDITIONAL SETBACK, WHICH IS NOT
	PROVIDED AT THIS POINT.
	6. NOT SATISFIED- PROPOSED PARKING EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM
	ALLOWED.
	MAXIMUM PARKING ALLOWED FOR THE PROJECT IS:
	SOFT MAXIMUM = 398,590 SF AT1.5/1,000 = 598 SPACES
	ADDITIONAL .75/1,000 WITH CONTRIBUTION TO TRANSIT = 299
	SPACES
	ADDITIONAL WITH TDM STRATEGIES = 299 SPACES
	TOTAL ALLOWED = 1,196 SPACES
	PARKING PROPOSES ON APRIL 23, 21 VERSION = 1,213 SPACES
	TO INCREASE FROM THE SOFT MAXIMUM THE PROJECT CAN:
	A. CONTRIBUTE TO THE TRANSIT OPERATION FUND (EXACT
	AMOUNT TO BE CALCULATED). THAT WILL ALLOW 299
	ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES.
	B. THE ADDITIONAL SPACES REQUESTED UP TO THE HARD
	MAXIMUM WOULD REQUIRE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TDM
	STRATEGIES. PLEASE IDENTIFY WHICH TDM STRATEGIES THE
	PROJECT IS GOING TO IMPLEMENT.

	7. NOT SATISFIED. REFUGE AREA MENTIONED IN THE RESPONSE
	LETTER IS NOT SHOWN IN THE DRAWINGS. PREVIOUS COMMENT:
	PROPOSED CURB CUT EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM 25 FEET ALLOWED.
	FURTHER DISCUSSION NECESSARY TO DETERMINE IF THE
	SERVICE DRIVE CAN BE REDUCED, OR IF THERE ARE ANY
	MEASURES TO MITIGATE THE IMPACT ON PEDESTRIANS.
	8. SATISFIED.- SIDEWALK ELEVATION SHALL BE MAINTAINED
	ACROSS THE DRIVEWAY.
	9. NOT SATISFIED PLEASE PROVIDE PRE-APPROVAL LETTER
	FROM FDOT TO CONFIRM THEY WILL ACCEPT THE DROP OFF AREA
	ON QUADRILLE BLVD AND THE LOCATION OF THE CURB
	CUTS.-PREVIOUS COMMENT: TPS LETTER FROM COUNTY MENTIONS
	THE POSSIBLE NEED FOR DECELERATION LANES TO ACCESS
	GARAGE. PLEASE PROVIDE A PRE-DETERMINATION LETTER FROM
	FDOT CONFIRMING THE AGENCY APPROVAL FOR THE PROPOSED
	SIDE PLAN (DRIVEWAYS, TREES ETC.)
	10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE NARRATIVE ON
	THE CURB SIDE MANAGEMENT OF ON-STREET DROP OFF/PICK UP
	AREA PROPOSED ON QUADRILLE BLVD.- PREVIOUS COMMENT:
	PLEASE PROVIDE FOR A CURB SIDE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND A
	FREIGHT DELIVERY MANAGEMENT PLAN.
	11.NOT SATISFIED. PROPOSED VALET LOCATION IS NOT
	FUNCTIONAL, THE VALET OPERATION IS BLOCKING THE TRAVEL
	LANES. A SEPARATE AREA FOR STACKING IS NEEDED. PLEASE
	INDICATE THE TRAVEL PATHS FOR CARS RECEIVED AT THE 2ND
	FLOOR VALET TO THE GROUND FLOOR VALET PARKING AREA.
	VALET CARS SHOULD NOT CIRCULATE IN THE PUBLIC ROW. ?
	PREVIOUS COMMENT: PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION REGARDING
	THE OPERATION OF THE VALET SERVICE FOR THE BUILDING.
	PLEASE IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF THE VALET PARKING
	DROP-OFF /PICK UP AREA INSIDE THE GARAGE.
	12. TO BE INCLUDED AS A CONDITON OF APPROVAL- DUE TO
	THE PROPOSAL TO INCLUDE TANDEM PARKING SPACES, VALET
	SERVICE WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT. A RESTRICTIVE
	COVENANT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT.

	13. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. STAFF RECOMMENDS MORE
	REALISTIC RENDERINGS FOR THE PB AND CITY COMMISSION
	MEETING. CAN THE CONCRETE PARAPET THAT CREATES THE
	ILLUSION OF SLAB THICKNESS BE TALLER TO FURTHER SCREEN
	THE CARS FROM VIEW? WHAT ABOUT SOME VEGETATION IN SOME
	OF THE SLAB PROJECTIONS THAT COMPLEMENT THE ART
	INSTALLATION AND HELP SCREEN THE CARS?? PREVIOUS
	COMMENT: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED
	REGARDING THE PROPOSED DESIGN OF THE PARKING GARAGE.
	STAFF RECOMMENDS APPLICANT TO PROVIDE DETAILED SECTIONS
	TO FULLY EXPLAIN THE SPECIAL DESIGN OF THE GARAGE SLABS
	THAT WILL JUSTIFY THE LACK OF ACTIVE USES. REALISTIC
	RENDERING IMAGES ARE ALSO RECOMMENDED TO FULLY DEPICT
	THE IMAGE OF THE GARAGE AND ALLOW A COMPLETE
	UNDERSTANDING OF THE GARAGE IMPACT ON THE SURROUNDING.
	RENDERINGS SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM ALL THE DIFFERENT
	VIEW POINTS OF THE GARAGE (DIXIE, LAKEVIEW, OKEECHOBEE)
	AND FROM STREET LEVEL PERSPECTIVE AS WELL AS FROM UPPER
	LEVELS FROM SURROUNDING BUILDINGS.
	PLANS INDICATE SOME OF THE PARKING SPACES AT THE EDGE
	OF THE SLAB, ARE THE CARS VISIBLE FROM OUTSIDE?
	14. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION IN A513 DOES NOT SEEM
	TO MATCH FLOOR PLANS BUT SEEMS TO INDICATE SOME
	ADDITIONAL SETBACK ABOVE FLOOR 6TH BEYOND THE MINIMUM
	REQUIRED. PLEASE INDICATE THE MINIMUM SETBACK LINE AND
	THE CONDITIONAL SETBACK FOR PARKING USES TO DETERMINE
	THE EXTENT OF THE WAIVER IN EACH PARKING LEVEL.
	PREVIOUS COMMENT: PLEASE INDICATE THE MINIMUM SETBACK
	IN THE GARAGE SECTIONS TO IDENTIFY THE EXTEND OF THE
	ENCROACHMENTS INDICATED IN THE FLOOR PLANS. ARE THE
	ENCROACHMENTS PROPOSED ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES?
	15. NOT SATISFIED. SOME ADDITIONAL TREES CAN BE
	INSTALLED NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE CANOPY TO BRING THE
	PROJECT CLOSER INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENT.
	PLEASE SUGGEST WHERE THE REMAINING TREES CAN BE
	LOCATION AROUND THE PROJECT. PREVIOUS COMMENT: STREET
	TREES ARE REQUIRED ALONG THE QUADRILLE BOULEVARD
	FRONTAGE EVERY 30 FEET.
	16. SATISFIED. SIDEWALK ALONG THE QUADRILLE FRONTAGE IS
	10 FEET AT ITS NARROWEST POINT. PREVIOUS COMMENT:
	SIDEWALK ALONG QUADRILLE BOULEVARD BY THE BUILDING
	ENTRANCE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET IN WIDTH.
	17. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A FA?ADE DETAIL
	DEPICTING THE TREATMENT OF THE FA?ADE TO ACCOMMODATE
	THE UTILITY ELEMENTS. ALSO PLEASE CLARIFY HOW IS THE
	ACCESS TO THE FIRE BACKFLOW. - PREVIOUS COMMENT: ALL
	BACKFLOW PREVENTORS AND ABOVE GROUND UTILITY
	CONNECTIONS AT THE GROUND LEVEL NEED TO BE SCREENED
	FROM VIEW. FURTHER DISCUSSION IS NECESSARY TO DETERMINE
	THE MOST APPROPRIATE LOCATION. LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS AND
	SITE PLAN DRAWINGS SHALL REFLECT THE PROPOSED LOCATION
	OF SUCH EQUIPMENT.
	18. NOT SATISFIED. - A COMPLETE SIGNAGE PACKET SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL AS PART OF THE LEVEL III SITE
	PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS BY THE CITY COMMISSION.
	19. SATISFIED. BIKE PARKING REQUIRED IS 120 SPACES. -
	PREVIOUS COMMENT: THE BIKE STORAGE INDICATED ON THE
	GROUND FLOOR ALONG OKEECHOBEE BLVD DOES NOT SEEM ENOUGH
	TO ACCOMMODATE THE 120 BIKE SPACES REQUIRED FOR THE
	PROJECT (1/10 PARKING SPACES)
	20. NOT SATISFIED. SHEET A112 WAS NOT INCLUDED IN
	SUBMITTED SET. BASED ON THE 382,211 SF OF NET OFFICE
	SPACE, THE PROJECT IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE 13 SHOWERS
	AND CHANGING FACILITIES. SHOWERS SHALL BE IN AREAS
	ACCESSIBLE TO ALL TENANTS. PLEASE INDICATE PRELIMINARY
	LOCATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS- PREVIOUS
	COMMENT: PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE SHOWER AND
	CHANGING ROOMS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT (1 SHOWER AND
	CHANGING /30,000 SF OF OFFICE).
	21. SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE A NOTE CALLING OUT THE
	NON-REFLECTIVE NATURE OF THE GLASS IN THE FA?ADE. -
	PLEASE CONFIRM THE PROPOSED GLASS IS NOT A REFLECTIVE
	GLASS TO CAUSE IMPACT OF DRIVERS.
	22. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE OBTAIN A PRE-APPROVAL LETTER
	FROM FDOT TO CONFIRM THEY WILL ALLOW THE PROPOSED
	PLACEMENT OF TREES ALONG THE CURB LINE. - PLEASE
	CONFIRM FDOT HAS APPROVED THE LOCATIONS OF THE PROPOSED
	TREES ALONG THE CURB.
	23. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS SHOULD
	HAVE THERMOPLASTIC ZEBRA PATTERN AND ADA RAMPS. ?
	PREVIOUS COMMENT: PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM
	COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISION OF PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS
	AT ALL INTERSECTIONS.
	24. NOT SATISFIED. BIKE PARKING FOR THE GENERAL PUBLIC
	SHALL BE INSTALLED AROUND THE PROJECT WITHIN THE PUBLIC
	REALM. PLEASE PROVIDE 1 BIKE SPACE PER EVERY 100 FEET
	OF STREET FRONTAGE. THE PROVIDED BIKE PARKING INSIDE
	THE BUILDING IS FOR THE BUILDING TENANTS. - PREVIOUS
	COMMENT: PUBLIC BIKE RACKS ARE REQUIRED ALONG THE
	STREET FRONTAGE AT A RATIO OF ONE PARKING SPACE/100
	LINEAR FEET OF FRONTAGE.
	25. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ANY CHANGES IN GRADE ELEVATION
	BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND THE FINISHED FLOOR SHALL BE
	ABSORBED INSIDE THE BUILDING. ? PREVIOUS COMMENT:
	PLEASE PROVIDE STREET SECTIONS INCLUDING GROUND FLOOR
	ELEVATIONS TO CONFIRM EXISTING STREET AND SIDEWALK
	ELEVATIONS CAN BE MET WITH THE NEW PROJECT.
	26. NOT SATISFIED. A MAXIMUM OF 30 % OF THE PARKING
	SPACES CAN BE COMPACT SPACES. PLEASE PROVIDE
	INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE. ? PREVIOUS COMMENT:
	PLEASE CONFIRM YOU DO NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE
	COMPACT PARKING SPACES FOR THE PROJECT.

	FOR RESUBMITTAL, PLEASE SUBMIT FOUR COPIES OF ALL
	DRAWINGS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION AND ONE CD WITH
	ELECTRONIC COPIES OF ALL DOCUMENTS AND DRAWINGS. PLEASE
	INCLUDE A RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH OF THE
	COMMENTS. THE DEADLINE FOR RESUBMITTAL IS 5/28/21 TO BE
	INCLUDED IN THE JULY 20 PLANNING BOARD AGENDA.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	01-13-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	aaponte			Date	01-13-2021	Time	18:26	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	aaponte			Date	12-08-2020	Time	15:23	Sent To

Notes

2021-01-13 18:28:05
	1. PLEASE PROVIDE A GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATION
	FOR EACH USE TO DETERMINE THE NEED FOR CONVERSION
	CAPACITY FROM THE CITYPLACE DRI. CURRENTLY THERE IS
	ONLY 383,429 SF OF OFFICE SPACE, AND 32,337 SF OR
	RETAIL AVAILABLE IN THE POOL. IT SEEMS THE GBA OF
	PROPOSED OFFICE MAY EXCEED THE AVAILABLE SF
	NECESSITATING A SF CONVERSION.
	2. PLEASE REVIEW ORDINANCE NO. 4412-12 AND PROVIDE
	CONFIRMATION OF COMPLIANCE FOR ALL APPLICABLE ITEMS.
	3. PLEASE PROVIDE GRAPHIC INFORMATION TO DEMONSTRATE
	COMPLIANCE WITH THE ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENTS.
	4. PROJECT IS REQUESTING 22 DIFFERENT WAIVERS FROM
	REGULATIONS. PLEASE FURTHER STUDY OPTIONS TO COMPLY
	WITH CODE REQUIREMENTS OR REDUCE THE WAIVER REQUEST.
	SOME OF THE WAIVERS THAT CAN BE REDUCED INCLUDE:
	A. PORTE COCHERE. CONSIDERING THE DROP-OFF AREA ON
	QUADRILLE CANNOT MEET THE PORTE COCHERE REQUIREMENTS
	STAFF RECOMMENDS UTILIZING A REGULAR ON-STREET
	DROP-OFF.
	B. TOWER AND GARAGE SEPARATION ARE NOT APPLICABLE TO
	THIS DISTRICT.
	5. PROJECT EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM BUILDING FOOTPRINT
	ALLOWED AT THE 6TH AND 7TH STORY (55%) AND ABOVE 8TH
	STORY (50%) DUE TO THE PARKING GOING UP 10 STORIES.
	JUSTIFICATION LIST THE WAIVER REQUEST TO EXCEED THE
	MAXIMUM BUILDING FOOTPRINT FROM 6TH TO 24TH FLOOR.
	PLEASE CLARIFY WHAT IS THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT PROVIDED
	ABOVE THE 10TH LEVEL. THE PROJECT IS ALLOWED TO EXCEED
	MAXIMUM BUILDING FOOTPRINTS ABOVE THE 5TH FLOOR, BUT IN
	COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONDITIONAL SETBACK, WHICH IS NOT
	PROVIDED AT THIS POINT.
	6. PROPOSED PARKING EXCEEDS THE SOFT MAXIMUM.
	OFFICE NET INTERIOR = 382,740SF (574-1,149MAX)
	RETAIL NET INTERIOR = 18,818SF (29MIN/58MAX)
	CAFE NET INTERIOR=480SF

	AS A RESULT, THE PARKING ALLOWED IS:
	SOFT MAXIMUM PARKING =603 SPACES
	HARD MAXIMUM 1,207 SPACES

	TO INCREASE FROM THE SOFT MAXIMUM THE PROJECT CAN:
	1. CONTRIBUTE TO THE TRANSIT OPERATION FUND (EXACT
	AMOUNT TO BE CALCULATED). THAT WILL ALLOW 301
	ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES.
	2. THE ADDITIONAL SPACES REQUESTED UP TO THE HARD
	MAXIMUM WOULD REQUIRE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TDM
	STRATEGIES. PLEASE IDENTIFY WHICH TDM STRATEGIES THE
	PROJECT IS GOING TO IMPLEMENT.

	7. PROPOSED CURB CUT EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM 25 FEET
	ALLOWED. FURTHER DISCUSSION NECESSARY TO DETERMINE IF
	THE SERVICE DRIVE CAN BE REDUCED, OR IF THERE ARE ANY
	MEASURES TO MITIGATE THE IMPACT ON PEDESTRIANS.
	8. SIDEWALK ELEVATION SHALL BE MAINTAINED ACROSS THE
	DRIVEWAY.
	9. TPS LETTER FROM COUNTY MENTIONS THE POSSIBLE NEED
	FOR DECELERATION LANES TO ACCESS GARAGE. PLEASE PROVIDE
	A PRE-DETERMINATION LETTER FROM FDOT CONFIRMING THE
	AGENCY APPROVAL FOR THE PROPOSED SIDE PLAN (DRIVEWAYS,
	TREES ETC.)
	10. PLEASE PROVIDE FOR A CURB SIDE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND
	A FREIGHT DELIVERY MANAGEMENT PLAN.
	11.PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION REGARDING THE OPERATION
	OF THE VALET SERVICE FOR THE BUILDING. PLEASE IDENTIFY
	THE LOCATION OF THE VALET PARKING DROP-OFF /PICK UP
	AREA INSIDE THE GARAGE.
	12. DUE TO THE PROPOSAL TO INCLUDE TANDEM PARKING
	SPACES, VALET SERVICE WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT.
	A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE
	PROJECT.

	13. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED REGARDING
	THE PROPOSED DESIGN OF THE PARKING GARAGE. STAFF
	RECOMMENDS APPLICANT TO PROVIDE DETAILED SECTIONS TO
	FULLY EXPLAIN THE SPECIAL DESIGN OF THE GARAGE SLABS
	THAT WILL JUSTIFY THE LACK OF ACTIVE USES. REALISTIC
	RENDERING IMAGES ARE ALSO RECOMMENDED TO FULLY DEPICT
	THE IMAGE OF THE GARAGE AND ALLOW A COMPLETE
	UNDERSTANDING OF THE GARAGE IMPACT ON THE SURROUNDING.
	RENDERINGS SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM ALL THE DIFFERENT
	VIEW POINTS OF THE GARAGE (DIXIE, LAKEVIEW, OKEECHOBEE)
	AND FROM STREET LEVEL PERSPECTIVE AS WELL AS FROM UPPER
	LEVELS FROM SURROUNDING BUILDINGS.
	PLANS INDICATE SOME OF THE PARKING SPACES AT THE EDGE
	OF THE SLAB, ARE THE CARS VISIBLE FROM OUTSIDE?
	14.PLEASE INDICATE THE MINIMUM SETBACK IN THE GARAGE
	SECTIONS TO IDENTIFY THE EXTEND OF THE ENCROACHMENTS
	INDICATED IN THE FLOOR PLANS. ARE THE ENCROACHMENTS
	PROPOSED ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES?
	15. STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED ALONG THE QUADRILLE
	BOULEVARD FRONTAGE EVERY 30 FEET.
	16. SIDEWALK ALONG QUADRILLE BOULEVARD BY THE BUILDING
	ENTRANCE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET IN WIDTH.
	17. ALL BACKFLOW PREVENTORS AND ABOVE GROUND UTILITY
	CONNECTIONS AT THE GROUND LEVEL NEED TO BE SCREENED
	FROM VIEW. FURTHER DISCUSSION IS NECESSARY TO DETERMINE
	THE MOST APPROPRIATE LOCATION. LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS AND
	SITE PLAN DRAWINGS SHALL REFLECT THE PROPOSED LOCATION
	OF SUCH EQUIPMENT.
	18. A COMPLETE SIGNAGE PACKET SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR
	APPROVAL AS PART OF THE LEVEL III SITE PLAN APPROVAL
	PROCESS BY THE CITY COMMISSION.
	19. THE BIKE STORAGE INDICATED ON THE GROUND FLOOR
	ALONG OKEECHOBEE BLVD DOES NOT SEEM ENOUGH TO
	ACCOMMODATE THE 120 BIKE SPACES REQUIRED FOR THE
	PROJECT (1/10 PARKING SPACES)
	20. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE SHOWER AND
	CHANGING ROOMS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT (1 SHOWER AND
	CHANGING /30,000 SF OF OFFICE).
	21. PLEASE CONFIRM THE PROPOSED GLASS IS NOT A
	REFLECTIVE GLASS TO CAUSE IMPACT OF DRIVERS.
	22. PLEASE CONFIRM FDOT HAS APPROVED THE LOCATIONS OF
	THE PROPOSED TREES ALONG THE CURB.
	23. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE
	WITH THE PROVISION OF PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS AT ALL
	INTERSECTIONS.
	24. PUBLIC BIKE RACKS ARE REQUIRED ALONG THE STREET
	FRONTAGE AT A RATIO OF ONE PARKING SPACE/100 LINEAR
	FEET OF FRONTAGE.
	25. PLEASE PROVIDE STREET SECTIONS INCLUDING GROUDN
	FLOOR ELEVATIONS TO CONFIRM EXISTING STREETAND SIDEWALK
	ELEVATIONS CAN BE MET WITH THE NEW PROJECT.
	26. PLEASE CONFIRM YOU DO NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM
	ALLOWABLE COMPACT PARKING SPACES FOR THE PROJECT.

	FOR RESUBMITTAL, PLEASE SUBMIT FOUR COPIES OF ALL
	DRAWINGS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION AND ONE CD WITH
	ELECTRONIC COPIES OF ALL DOCUMENTS AND DRAWINGS. PLEASE
	INCLUDE A RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH OF THE
	COMMENTS.