 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z20100014
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z20100014 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
11-10-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
11-10-2020 |
Time |
19:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
11-10-2020 |
Time |
19:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-11-10 19:55:35 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR | | | THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, | | | AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 3. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, | | | FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, | | | GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, | | | SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 4. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER | | | AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY, | | | INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE | | | CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION | | | THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY. | | | | | | 5. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT | | | WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL | | | HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION | | | OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, | | | CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT | | | (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 6. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT | | | TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE | | | ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP | | | ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC | | | PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
04-09-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
04-09-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
04-09-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-04-09 15:15:24 | PASSED WITH PROVISOS: | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD | | | CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, | | | PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]: | | | | | | -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD SEPARATE PAGE TO | | | CIVIL PLANS WITH THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH WATER | | | SERVICE STANDARD DETAILS THAT WILL BE UTILIZED AND MAKE | | | SURE THEY ARE THE NEWEST REVISION. ALSO VERIFY THE GATE | | | VALVE SIZE THAT IS BEING UTILIZED BETWEEN THE CROSS AND | | | REDUCER ? IT SAYS 6INCH, BUT SEEMS LIKE IT WOULD NEED | | | TO BE 8INCH. LASTLY, LABEL THE WATER SERVICE PIPING ON | | | INSET A FOR THE 1.5? METERS WITH PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL | | | TYPE. | | | | | | NEW COMMENT: | | | | | | -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE LABEL THE 10 | | | FOOT UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR THE ELECTRIC TRANSFORMERS AS | | | EXISTING OR PROPOSED. | | | | | | RESPECTFULLY, | | | | | | MARK HURLEY | | | FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC UTILITIES | | | 561-822-2262 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-26-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
02-26-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
02-26-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-02-26 13:16:11 | Z20100014 ? CONGRESS CROSSING ? 2-18-2021 RESUB | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD | | | CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, | | | PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]: | | | | | | -EXISTING 6INCH WATER PIPE RUNNING ACROSS ROAD IS NOT | | | BEING BILLED OUT AS A FIRELINE AS PREVIOUSLY THOUGHT. | | | NOTHING TO RESOLVE OR PROCESS WITH UTILITY BILLING | | | CONCERNING IT. | | | -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD SEPARATE PAGE TO | | | CIVIL PLANS WITH THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH WATER | | | SERVICE STANDARD DETAILS THAT WILL BE UTILIZED AND MAKE | | | SURE THEY ARE THE NEWEST REVISION. ALSO VERIFY THE GATE | | | VALVE SIZE THAT IS BEING UTILIZED BETWEEN THE CROSS AND | | | REDUCER ? IT SAYS 6INCH, BUT SEEMS LIKE IT WOULD NEED | | | TO BE 8INCH. LASTLY, LABEL THE WATER SERVICE PIPING ON | | | INSET A FOR THE 1.5? METERS WITH PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL | | | TYPE. | | | | | | COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPT., (561) 494-1098 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | 1. CONFIRM THAT A COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE | | | HAS BEEN SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF | | | CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION). | | | 2. CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY | | | SEWER ARE REQUIRED. | | | 3. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND | | | PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM | | | AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE | | | PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER. | | | 4. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND | | | IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED | | | AREAS. | | | 5. COORDINATE WITH MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE | | | SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING | | | PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT | | | HIM AT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected] | | | 6. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL , PLANS SHALL SHOW | | | PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, | | | STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES, INCLUDING | | | STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY | | | SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, METERS, AND | | | OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH | | | BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES | | | SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, | | | CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND | | | MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER LINES. LABEL | | | ALL UTILITIES AS EXISTING OR PROPOSED. ALL AVAILABLE | | | ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION | | | OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR | | | ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW | | | SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED UNDERGROUND | | | UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, | | | AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED | | | ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | 7. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL , CUT AND CAP | | | UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY ABANDONED UTILITY | | | LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY RIGHT OF WAY. | | | 8. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL , PROVIDE DEDICATED | | | UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO | | | PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. | | | 9. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION OF WATER | | | METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION. | | | 10. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE CALLOUT | | | DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA AND FIRE BACKFLOW | | | PREVENTER AS DCDA. SPECIFY LEAD FREE DESIGN ON ALL | | | BACKFLOWS. | | | 11. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND | | | NPDES NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED. | | | - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT: | | | - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS | | | THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF | | | DEVELOPMENT OR SALE; | | | - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE | | | STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A | | | MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4). | | | - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF | | | CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION | | | THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL | | | SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT | | | OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION. | | | 12. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES | | | OF WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS. | | | 13. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING | | | APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT | | | SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING | | | SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED | | | LEAD-FREE DESIGN. | | | 14. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL CLEARLY SHOW ROAD | | | RIGHT OF WAY. | | | 15. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL PROVIDE SANITARY | | | ELEVATIONS AT MANHOLE TIE-IN. | | | 16. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES | | | ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY | | | LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT | | | PARCELS (IF ANY). | | | 17. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES | | | ARE BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL | | | ADDRESSES. | | | 18. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN TRENCHING IN | | | IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE 50 | | | FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF | | | PROPOSED TRENCH PER CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8. | | | 19. PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING AND | | | INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER | | | (Z-XXXXXXXX). | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-31-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
12-31-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
12-31-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-12-31 07:07:19 | PLEASE PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER | | | FROM MANHOLE TO MANHOLE ? PLEASE NOTE THAT PROVISION OF | | | CCTV IS A REQUIREMENT OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL. | | | | | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | CONCERNS, THANKS. | | | RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES | | | DEPARTMENT | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 [email protected] | | | | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD | | | CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, | | | PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]: | | | | | | -COMMENT RESPONSE LETTER ITEMS 24-28 DO NOT APPEAR TO | | | HAVE THE CORRECT RESPONSES MATCHED UP. | | | | | | -?20. UTILITY BILLING SYSTEM IS SHOWING SITE AS HAVING | | | A 6? FIRELINE THAT IS BEING PAID FOR EACH MONTH. PLEASE | | | LABEL ON CIVIL PLAN AND PUT WHAT IS HAPPENING TO IT. | | | RESPONSE: THERE IS NO KNOWN EXISTING FIRE LINE ONSITE | | | FOR THIS PROPERTY. THE ONLY POSSIBLE FIRE LINE NEAR THE | | | SITE IS THE EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT WITHIN THE EXISTING | | | UTILITY EASEMENT JUST OUTSIDE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.? | | | | | | HAD A UTILITY LOCATE SPECIALIST CHECK THE SITE AND THEY | | | ARE SEEING UTILITY PIPE CROSSING THE ROAD THAT IS DRAWN | | | ON C-1 BUT NOT LABELED. IT IS SHOWN AS 6INCH WATER | | | SERVICE ON HISTORIC ASBUILT. THAT APPEARS TO BE THE | | | EXISTING FIRELINE THAT IS GETTING CHARGED AND PAID FOR | | | EACH MONTH. PROJECT NEEDS TO FIND A WAY TO MAKE USE OF | | | IT OR GO THROUGH PROCESS TO ELIMINATE IT. | | | | | | | | | NEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | -DO NOT PLACE GATE VALVES IN SIDEWALKS. | | | | | | -PLEASE PLACE GATE VALVE SO THE FIRELINE BACKFLOW | | | ASSEMBLY CAN BE INDEPENDENTLY SHUT OFF WITHOUT SHUTTING | | | OFF THE DOMESTIC WATER SERVICES. THAT VALVE SHOULD BE | | | IN THE EASTERN PART OF UTILITY EASEMENT. ADD LABELING - | | | FIRELINE POINT OF SERVICE. | | | | | | -RECOMMEND 8 BY 6 REDUCER FOR WATER SERVICES BE PLACED | | | DOWNSTREAM OF THE DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE CROSS SO THAT | | | FIRELINE FLOW IS NOT DIMINISHED. | | | | | | -THERE WERE SOME TREES ON FAR EAST SIDE OF PROPERTY | | | SHOWN ON PLANS THAT WERE IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE | | | WATER MAINS. IF THE TREES ARE PROPOSED AND NOT | | | EXISTING, THEN PLEASE LOCATE THEM FURTHER AWAY AND ADD | | | ROOT BARRIERS. | | | | | | -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL: PLEASE DRAW AND | | | LABEL EXISTING GATE VALVES ON WATER MAINS, LABEL PIPE | | | MATERIAL TYPE AND SIZE OF THE DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE | | | LINES, AND ADD ADDRESS TO THE CIVIL PLANS. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-03-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
11-03-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
11-03-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
ENG - PPRC |
|
| Notes |
| 2020-11-03 06:52:27 | | | | | | | 1. THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF | | | REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY | | | AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND | | | WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. TO VIEW | | | DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER | | | ENGINEERING RELATED DOCUMENTS, OPEN A BROWSER IN CHROME | | | AND GO TO: WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGDOCS . TO LOGIN, UNDER | | | ?EMAIL? ENTER [email protected] ; UNDER ?PASSWORD? ENTER | | | SIMPLE321# | | | THERE ARE 4 PAGES OF AVAILABLE ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS | | | FOR YOUR USE. | | | 2. CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, | | | FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08, ADOPTED | | | SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18) CHAPTER 90 | | | UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. SEC. 90-7. | | | POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER SERVICE | | | FACILITIES OF THE CITY: | | | THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE | | | CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY | | | BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS, | | | BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION. | | | 3. AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR | | | MORE INFORMATION, OPEN A BROWSER IN CHROME AND GO TO: | | | WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGDOCS .TO LOGIN, UNDER ?EMAIL? ENTER | | | [email protected] ; UNDER ?PASSWORD? ENTER SIMPLE321# | | | CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL IS ON PAGE 4. | | | 4. PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY | | | OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC | | | RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF | | | YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE | | | MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL | | | IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT | | | [email protected] OR 561-494-1040 FOR FURTHER | | | ASSISTANCE. | | | 5. PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS | | | OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES, | | | INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND | | | SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, | | | METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE | | | SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING | | | GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, | | | ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL | | | INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER | | | LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE | | | PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN | | | VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. | | | PLEASE SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT | | | MATERIAL. ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL | | | EXISTING AND PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, | | | INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & | | | TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL | | | UTILITY CROSSINGS. | | | 6. CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY | | | ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY | | | ROW. | | | 7. PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE | | | DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB | | | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION). | | | 8. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND | | | PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM | | | AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE | | | PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER. | | | 9. SHOW VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION INFORMATION | | | (NAVD 88 AND NGVD 29). | | | 10. PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER | | | WITHIN CUL DE SAC FROM MANHOLE TO MANHOLE. | | | 11. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND | | | IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED | | | AREAS. | | | 12. PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR | | | PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS. | | | 13. PLEASE LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE | | | APPLICABLE. | | | 14. PLEASE PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED | | | LOCATION OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION. | | | 15. COORDINATE WITH MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE | | | SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING | | | PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT | | | HIM AT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected] | | | 16. PROVIDE DEDICATED UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS | | | FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. | | | 17. ADD SANITARY MANHOLE FOR POINT OF SERVICE AT BACK | | | OF SIDEWALK WITHIN UTILITY EASEMENT (IF POSSIBLE). | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD | | | CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, | | | PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]: | | | | | | -WATER METERS AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES NEED TO BE | | | LOCATED ADJACENT THE PROPERTY LINE AND CUL DE SAC. | | | METER BOXES SHOULD BE IN UTILITY EASEMENTS, AND | | | BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES CANNOT GO IN UTILITY EASEMENTS. | | | | | | -WILL SEPARATE METERED IRRIGATION WATER SERVICES BE | | | NEEDED? (DO NOT SEE ANY ON PLAN) | | | | | | -UTILITY BILLING SYSTEM IS SHOWING SITE AS HAVING A 6? | | | FIRELINE THAT IS BEING PAID FOR EACH MONTH. PLEASE | | | LABEL ON CIVIL PLAN AND PUT WHAT IS HAPPENING TO IT. | | | | | | -WILL THE NEW SIDEWALKS BE CONNECTED TO THE EXISTING | | | SIDEWALKS OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES? | | | | | | -PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT SHOULD BE LOCATED NEAR PROPERTY | | | LINE AT CUL DE SAC. IF WANT TO LOCATE IT FAR WITHIN THE | | | PROPERTY, THEN NEED TO HAVE IT DOWNSTREAM OF DCDA AND | | | SIZE THE FIRELINE AND DCDA AT LEAST 6 INCHES. IF | | | DOWNSTREAM OF DCDA IT WOULD BE A PRIVATELY OWNED AND | | | MAINTAINED FIRE HYDRANT. | | | | | | -WILL THE FINISHED PROPERTY REMAIN SEPARATE | | | PARCELS/ADDRESSES OR COMBINE INTO ONE? | | | | | | -PHASE II HAS PROPOSED LARGE SECTION OF SIDEWALK OVER | | | EXISTING WATER MAIN. CAN THAT SECTION IN UTILITY | | | EASEMENT AND OVER WATER MAIN BE ELIMINATED OR REROUTED? | | | | | | -PLEASE LABEL EXISTING WATER MAINS WITH SIZE AND PIPE | | | MATERIAL TYPE. | | | | | | -CANNOT FIND WATER DEMAND CALCULATIONS ON SHEET C-1 OR | | | SIZING OF WATER SERVICES, METERS, & BACKFLOW | | | ASSEMBLIES. THE FOOTPRINT AREA FOR THEM CAN VARY | | | GREATLY DEPENDING ON SIZING. | | | | | | -WATER SERVICES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY MUST BE IN UTILITY | | | EASEMENTS. | | | | | | -SHEET C-1 DID NOT SHOW PAVEMENT RESTORATION FOR BEACON | | | CIR. PLEASE ADD TO CIVIL PLAN. ALSO BEACON CIR APPEARS | | | TO BE PRIVATELY OWNED ROAD ? MAY NEED AUTHORIZATION OR | | | AGREEMENT FROM ASSOCIATION. | | | | | | | | | RESPECTFULLY, | | | | | | MARK HURLEY | | | FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC UTILITIES | | | 561-822-2262 | | | | | | | | | | | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | CONCERNS, THANKS. | | | RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES | | | DEPARTMENT | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
11-04-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
11-04-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
11-04-2020 |
Time |
11:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-11-04 12:35:19 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE | | | OCCUPANCY TYPE, PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE. | | | | | | 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE | | | LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER | | | SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED | | | ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | THE PROPOSED LOCATIONS OF THE FIRE HYDRANT AND FDC ARE | | | ACCEPTABLE WITH ANY CHANGES CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH | | | THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | 9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER | | | THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY | | | ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM, | | | ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FS 61G AND | | | SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PERMIT. | | | | | | 9A) THE LOCATION OF ANY APPLICABLE DDCV AND FIRE LINE | | | LOCATIONS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND | | | SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, | | | THE CITY'S ENGINEERS OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND | | | THE CITY'S PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE. | | | | | | 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE | | | SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY | | | DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS. | | | | | | 12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
04-08-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
04-08-2021 |
Time |
16:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
04-08-2021 |
Time |
16:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-04-08 16:59:05 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: CONGRESS CROSSING CPD LOTS 6, 7, AND 8 - MAJOR | | | PD AMENDMENT Z20100014 | | | APRIL 8, 2021 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE INVENTORY PLAN THAT HAS | | | ALL TREE NUMBERS CLEARLY VISIBLE. SOME ARE OBSCURED BY | | | THE THICK LINE REPRESENTING THE PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE | | | TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON | | | SITE OR RELOCATED. LIVE AND LAUREL OAK TREES AND SABAL | | | PALMS ARE LISTED TO BE REMOVED THAT ARE INDICATED AS IN | | | GOOD CONDITION. PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS REPORT CONTAINING | | | THE METHOD OF DETERMINATION OF THE CONDITION AND | | | RELOCATION ASSESSMENT FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS | | | PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS FOR TREES WITHIN 10 | | | FEET OF THE PROPERTY LINE ON ADJACENT PARCELS AND | | | ADJUST SPACING OF PROPOSED TREES O AVOID CANOPY | | | CONFLICTS PER SECTION 94-442(B) (2)Q. | | | | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. IN THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CHART ON | | | SHEET LP-1.00, EXPLAIN THE NOTE ?(EXCLUDES LANDSCAPE | | | WITHIN PARKING LOT AREA)? UNDER GENERAL LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. UNDER NATURAL GRASS CORRECT THE REQUIRED | | | LANDSCAPE AREA TO 15% FOR PD AND SHOW SQUARE FOOTAGE | | | AND PERCENTAGE OF GRASS PROPOSED. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. EXPLAIN THE REASON FOR INCLUDING PLAZA | | | DATA. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE PERCENTAGE OF PALM | | | SUBSTITUTIONS FOR REQUIRED TREES NOT EXCEEDING 35% PER | | | SECTION 94-442(D). | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. INDICATE THE 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER | | | LOCATIONS ON THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN ADJACENT | | | TO ALL PROPERTY LINES FOR THE PARCEL. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. PROVIDE ALL CALCULATIONS FOR THE REQUIRED | | | TREES FOR BUFFER SEGMENTS IN A PERIMETER BUFFER | | | REQUIREMENT CHART AND LIST LINEAR FOOTAGE OF EACH | | | PROPERTY LINE SEGMENT MEASURED ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF | | | EACH BUFFER CONTINUOUSLY. DUE TO THE IRREGULAR SHAPE, | | | EACH BUFFER LENGTH MAY BE DESIGNATED WITH A LETTER, | | | THEN CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED TREES CALCULATED FOR | | | EACH SEGMENT CALCULATED, ROUNDING UP FOR ANY PORTION | | | LEFT AFTER DIVIDING BY THE REQUIRED 30 FOOT LENGTHS. | | | SEE SECTION 94-443 (B) FOR THE BUFFERS ADJACENT TO | | | NON-RESIDENTIAL AND SECTION 94-443(A) FOR BUFFERS | | | ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL ZONING. | | | | | | BUFFER A IS 374 LINEAR FEET SO 13 TREES ARE REQUIRED. | | | SECTION 94-443(2) DOES NOT DEDUCT DRIVEWAY OPENINGS, IT | | | IS THE ENTIRE LENGTH THAT IS USED TO CALCULATE REQUIRED | | | BUFFER TREES. | | | THE VACANT LOT DOES NOT RELATE TO THIS BUFFER, THE PLAN | | | IS STILL SHOWING DEDUCTION OF 50 FEET FOR DRIVEWAYS. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. EXPLAIN THE REFERENCE TO THE 25? BUFFER. | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATION FOR BUFFER LENGTHS | | | WITH ACCESS DRIVEWAYS TO SHOW THEY DO NOT EXCEED 20% | | | INTERRUPTION FOR VEHICULAR ACCESS AS REQUIRED BY | | | SECTION 94-443(D)(1)A. | | | 25% PER 94-443(B)(2) IS THE CORRECT SECTION FOR | | | NONRESIDENTIAL. | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED LINEAR | | | FOOTAGE OF LANDSCAPE AREA ADJACENT TO EACH BUILDING. | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. MODIFY THE PLANT LIST TO ADD COLUMN FOR | | | DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVELS TO PROVIDE EASIER REFERENCE. | | | | | | 14. SATISFIED. ADD ANY RELOCATED OR EXISTING TREES AND | | | PALMS TO THE PLANT LIST AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE | | | REQUIRED TREES. | | | | | | 15. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A | | | MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO | | | BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING | | | AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE REQUIRED | | | NUMBER OF TREES AND THE PERCENTAGE OF CATEGORY 1 TREES | | | PROVIDED FOR THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS. | | | | | | 16. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING | | | AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND | | | LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH | | | SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4), FOLLOWING THE AREA | | | CLASSIFICATIONS AS SHOWN IN FIGURE XIV-1. | | | ? PARKING SPACES SHADED AS ONE AREA, SHOW TOTAL SPACES | | | TIMES 10 SQ FT PER SPACE. PROVIDE TOTAL | | | ? ALL OTHER PAVED AREAS SHADED DIFFERENTLY AND TOTAL | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE. DIVIDE BY 100 AND MULTIPLY BY 4 SQ FT. | | | PROVIDE TOTAL. | | | ? TOTAL THESE 2 SQUARE FOOTAGE AMOUNTS FOR THE REQUIRED | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE. | | | ? SHOW ALL INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREAS AS A DIFFERENT | | | SHADE AND SHOW PROVIDED SQUARE FOOTAGE. | | | | | | 17. SATISFIED. DIMENSION ALL INTERIOR AND TERMINAL | | | LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ON THE SITE PLAN TO SHOW THE MINIMUM | | | 8 FEET WIDTH OF THE LANDSCAPE AREA IS AT LEAST 8 FEET. | | | | | | 18. SATISFIED. TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND TREE IS | | | MISSING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER ADJACENT TO THE 20 FOOT | | | MAINTENANCE ACCESS. | | | | | | 19. SATISFIED. LANDSCAPE DIVIDER MEDIANS HAVE A | | | REQUIREMENT FOR TREES PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3)C. THE | | | INTENT IS TO PROVIDE SHADE OVER THE PAVED AREAS. | | | PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TREES AS PALMS DO NOT MEET THE | | | INTENT. | | | | | | 20. SATISFIED. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE | | | CHART TO ADD DESIGN OPTION 8 FOR THE REQUIRED MULCH AND | | | RECHECK THE 50% SOD AREA FOR THE PROVIDED LANDSCAPE | | | AREA. | | | | | | | | | 21. SATISFIED. THERE APPEAR TO BE CONFLICTS IN SEVERAL | | | LOCATIONS BETWEEN REQUIRED TREES IN LANDSCAPE ISLANDS | | | AND WATER AND SEWER LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. ADJUST | | | LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH | | | TREES. HYDRANTS, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS AND FDC | | | CONNECTIONS CANNOT INFRINGE ON THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE | | | AREAS INTENDED FOR THE TREES. | | | | | | 22. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND | | | SCREENING FOR ALL ABOVE GROUND UTILITY VALVES, BACKFLOW | | | PREVENTERS, A/C UNITS, AND FPL TRANSFORMERS. | | | COULD NOT LOCATE FPL TRANSFORMER LOCATIONS. | | | | | | 23. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE PERCENTAGE TO BASED ON THE | | | PLANT LIST TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. | | | PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT | | | MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | | | | ORDINANCE NO. 4146-08 DESIGN STANDARDS #12 LANDSCAPE | | | GUIDELINES: | | | | | | 24. SATISFIED. PROVIDE APPROVAL FROM THE CPD | | | ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD FOR THE FINAL LANDSCAPE AND | | | IRRIGATION PLANS. | | | | | | 25. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE 5 FOOT HEIGHT | | | FENCE AS REQUIRED ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 26. SATISFIED. BUFFER TREES ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL | | | ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE NEED TO BE LARGER SPECIES | | | THAN CLUSIA AND PIGEON PLUM TO MEET THE BUFFERING | | | INTENT OF THE LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 1/12/21: | | | | | | 27. SATISFIED. ALL TREES PROVIDED MUST MEET THE 12 FOOT | | | MINIMUM HEIGHT. ADJUST PLANT LIST TO CORRECT PIGEON | | | PLUM, SILVER BUTTONWOOD, DAHOON HOLLY, CRAPE MYRTLE, | | | AND PLUMERIA FROM 8 FEET TO 12 FEET. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 3/4/21: | | | 28. SATISFIED. BUFFER G MUST CONTAIN 7 QUALIFYING TREES | | | AND THE REQUIRED HEDGE. APPROPRIATE UNDERSTORY TREES | | | PLACED AWAY FROM THE PROPERTY LINE AS APPROPRIATE MAY | | | BE USED. IF NOT, A WAIVER MUST BE REQUESTED. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-09-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-09-2021 |
Time |
08:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-09-2021 |
Time |
08:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-09 08:57:25 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: CONGRESS CROSSING CPD LOTS 6, 7, AND 8 - MAJOR | | | PD AMENDMENT Z20100014 | | | MARCH 4, 2020 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE INVENTORY PLAN THAT HAS | | | ALL TREE NUMBERS CLEARLY VISIBLE. SOME ARE OBSCURED BY | | | THE THICK LINE REPRESENTING THE PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE | | | TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON | | | SITE OR RELOCATED. LIVE AND LAUREL OAK TREES AND SABAL | | | PALMS ARE LISTED TO BE REMOVED THAT ARE INDICATED AS IN | | | GOOD CONDITION. PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS REPORT CONTAINING | | | THE METHOD OF DETERMINATION OF THE CONDITION AND | | | RELOCATION ASSESSMENT FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS | | | PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS FOR TREES WITHIN 10 | | | FEET OF THE PROPERTY LINE ON ADJACENT PARCELS AND | | | ADJUST SPACING OF PROPOSED TREES O AVOID CANOPY | | | CONFLICTS PER SECTION 94-442(B) (2)Q. | | | | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. IN THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CHART ON | | | SHEET LP-1.00, EXPLAIN THE NOTE ?(EXCLUDES LANDSCAPE | | | WITHIN PARKING LOT AREA)? UNDER GENERAL LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. UNDER NATURAL GRASS CORRECT THE REQUIRED | | | LANDSCAPE AREA TO 15% FOR PD AND SHOW SQUARE FOOTAGE | | | AND PERCENTAGE OF GRASS PROPOSED. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. EXPLAIN THE REASON FOR INCLUDING PLAZA | | | DATA. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE PERCENTAGE OF PALM | | | SUBSTITUTIONS FOR REQUIRED TREES NOT EXCEEDING 35% PER | | | SECTION 94-442(D). | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. INDICATE THE 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER | | | LOCATIONS ON THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN ADJACENT | | | TO ALL PROPERTY LINES FOR THE PARCEL. | | | | | | 9. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE ALL CALCULATIONS FOR | | | THE REQUIRED TREES FOR BUFFER SEGMENTS IN A PERIMETER | | | BUFFER REQUIREMENT CHART AND LIST LINEAR FOOTAGE OF | | | EACH PROPERTY LINE SEGMENT MEASURED ALONG THE | | | CENTERLINE OF EACH BUFFER CONTINUOUSLY. DUE TO THE | | | IRREGULAR SHAPE, EACH BUFFER LENGTH MAY BE DESIGNATED | | | WITH A LETTER, THEN CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED TREES | | | CALCULATED FOR EACH SEGMENT CALCULATED, ROUNDING UP FOR | | | ANY PORTION LEFT AFTER DIVIDING BY THE REQUIRED 30 FOOT | | | LENGTHS. SEE SECTION 94-443 (B) FOR THE BUFFERS | | | ADJACENT TO NON-RESIDENTIAL AND SECTION 94-443(A) FOR | | | BUFFERS ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL ZONING. | | | | | | BUFFER A IS 374 LINEAR FEET SO 13 TREES ARE REQUIRED. | | | SECTION 94-443(2) DOES NOT DEDUCT DRIVEWAY OPENINGS, IT | | | IS THE ENTIRE LENGTH THAT IS USED TO CALCULATE REQUIRED | | | BUFFER TREES. | | | THE VACANT LOT DOES NOT RELATE TO THIS BUFFER, THE PLAN | | | IS STILL SHOWING DEDUCTION OF 50 FEET FOR DRIVEWAYS. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. EXPLAIN THE REFERENCE TO THE 25? BUFFER. | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATION FOR BUFFER LENGTHS | | | WITH ACCESS DRIVEWAYS TO SHOW THEY DO NOT EXCEED 20% | | | INTERRUPTION FOR VEHICULAR ACCESS AS REQUIRED BY | | | SECTION 94-443(D)(1)A. | | | 25% PER 94-443(B)(2) IS THE CORRECT SECTION FOR | | | NONRESIDENTIAL. | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED LINEAR | | | FOOTAGE OF LANDSCAPE AREA ADJACENT TO EACH BUILDING. | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. MODIFY THE PLANT LIST TO ADD COLUMN FOR | | | DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVELS TO PROVIDE EASIER REFERENCE. | | | | | | 14. SATISFIED. ADD ANY RELOCATED OR EXISTING TREES AND | | | PALMS TO THE PLANT LIST AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE | | | REQUIRED TREES. | | | | | | 15. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A | | | MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO | | | BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING | | | AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE REQUIRED | | | NUMBER OF TREES AND THE PERCENTAGE OF CATEGORY 1 TREES | | | PROVIDED FOR THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS. | | | | | | 16. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING | | | AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND | | | LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH | | | SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4), FOLLOWING THE AREA | | | CLASSIFICATIONS AS SHOWN IN FIGURE XIV-1. | | | ? PARKING SPACES SHADED AS ONE AREA, SHOW TOTAL SPACES | | | TIMES 10 SQ FT PER SPACE. PROVIDE TOTAL | | | ? ALL OTHER PAVED AREAS SHADED DIFFERENTLY AND TOTAL | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE. DIVIDE BY 100 AND MULTIPLY BY 4 SQ FT. | | | PROVIDE TOTAL. | | | ? TOTAL THESE 2 SQUARE FOOTAGE AMOUNTS FOR THE REQUIRED | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE. | | | ? SHOW ALL INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREAS AS A DIFFERENT | | | SHADE AND SHOW PROVIDED SQUARE FOOTAGE. | | | | | | 17. SATISFIED. DIMENSION ALL INTERIOR AND TERMINAL | | | LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ON THE SITE PLAN TO SHOW THE MINIMUM | | | 8 FEET WIDTH OF THE LANDSCAPE AREA IS AT LEAST 8 FEET. | | | | | | 18. SATISFIED. TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND TREE IS | | | MISSING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER ADJACENT TO THE 20 FOOT | | | MAINTENANCE ACCESS. | | | | | | 19. SATISFIED. LANDSCAPE DIVIDER MEDIANS HAVE A | | | REQUIREMENT FOR TREES PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3)C. THE | | | INTENT IS TO PROVIDE SHADE OVER THE PAVED AREAS. | | | PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TREES AS PALMS DO NOT MEET THE | | | INTENT. | | | | | | 20. SATISFIED. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE | | | CHART TO ADD DESIGN OPTION 8 FOR THE REQUIRED MULCH AND | | | RECHECK THE 50% SOD AREA FOR THE PROVIDED LANDSCAPE | | | AREA. | | | | | | | | | 21. SATISFIED. THERE APPEAR TO BE CONFLICTS IN SEVERAL | | | LOCATIONS BETWEEN REQUIRED TREES IN LANDSCAPE ISLANDS | | | AND WATER AND SEWER LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. ADJUST | | | LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH | | | TREES. HYDRANTS, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS AND FDC | | | CONNECTIONS CANNOT INFRINGE ON THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE | | | AREAS INTENDED FOR THE TREES. | | | | | | 22. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND | | | SCREENING FOR ALL ABOVE GROUND UTILITY VALVES, BACKFLOW | | | PREVENTERS, A/C UNITS, AND FPL TRANSFORMERS. | | | COULD NOT LOCATE FPL TRANSFORMER LOCATIONS. | | | | | | 23. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE PERCENTAGE TO BASED ON THE | | | PLANT LIST TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. | | | PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT | | | MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | | | | ORDINANCE NO. 4146-08 DESIGN STANDARDS #12 LANDSCAPE | | | GUIDELINES: | | | | | | 24. SATISFIED. PROVIDE APPROVAL FROM THE CPD | | | ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD FOR THE FINAL LANDSCAPE AND | | | IRRIGATION PLANS. | | | | | | 25. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE 5 FOOT HEIGHT | | | FENCE AS REQUIRED ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 26. SATISFIED. BUFFER TREES ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL | | | ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE NEED TO BE LARGER SPECIES | | | THAN CLUSIA AND PIGEON PLUM TO MEET THE BUFFERING | | | INTENT OF THE LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 1/12/21: | | | | | | 27. SATISFIED. ALL TREES PROVIDED MUST MEET THE 12 FOOT | | | MINIMUM HEIGHT. ADJUST PLANT LIST TO CORRECT PIGEON | | | PLUM, SILVER BUTTONWOOD, DAHOON HOLLY, CRAPE MYRTLE, | | | AND PLUMERIA FROM 8 FEET TO 12 FEET. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 3/4/21: | | | 28. BUFFER G MUST CONTAIN 7 QUALIFYING TREES AND THE | | | REQUIRED HEDGE. APPROPRIATE UNDERSTORY TREES PLACED | | | AWAY FROM THE PROPERTY LINE AS APPROPRIATE MAY BE USED. | | | IF NOT, A WAIVER MUST BE REQUESTED. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | | | | COMMUNICATE DTO TIFFANY ON 3/8/21 REGARDING INTERIM | | | RESUBMITTAL OF CORRECTED PLANS | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-12-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
01-12-2021 |
Time |
16:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
01-12-2021 |
Time |
16:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-01-12 16:41:16 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: CONGRESS CROSSING CPD LOTS 6, 7, AND 8 - MAJOR | | | PD AMENDMENT Z20100014 | | | JANUARY 12, 2020 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE INVENTORY PLAN THAT HAS | | | ALL TREE NUMBERS CLEARLY VISIBLE. SOME ARE OBSCURED BY | | | THE THICK LINE REPRESENTING THE PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE | | | TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON | | | SITE OR RELOCATED. LIVE AND LAUREL OAK TREES AND SABAL | | | PALMS ARE LISTED TO BE REMOVED THAT ARE INDICATED AS IN | | | GOOD CONDITION. PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS REPORT CONTAINING | | | THE METHOD OF DETERMINATION OF THE CONDITION AND | | | RELOCATION ASSESSMENT FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS | | | PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS FOR TREES WITHIN 10 | | | FEET OF THE PROPERTY LINE ON ADJACENT PARCELS AND | | | ADJUST SPACING OF PROPOSED TREES O AVOID CANOPY | | | CONFLICTS PER SECTION 94-442(B) (2)Q. | | | | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. IN THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CHART ON | | | SHEET LP-1.00, EXPLAIN THE NOTE ?(EXCLUDES LANDSCAPE | | | WITHIN PARKING LOT AREA)? UNDER GENERAL LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. UNDER NATURAL GRASS CORRECT THE REQUIRED | | | LANDSCAPE AREA TO 15% FOR PD AND SHOW SQUARE FOOTAGE | | | AND PERCENTAGE OF GRASS PROPOSED. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. EXPLAIN THE REASON FOR INCLUDING PLAZA | | | DATA. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE PERCENTAGE OF PALM | | | SUBSTITUTIONS FOR REQUIRED TREES NOT EXCEEDING 35% PER | | | SECTION 94-442(D). | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. INDICATE THE 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER | | | LOCATIONS ON THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN ADJACENT | | | TO ALL PROPERTY LINES FOR THE PARCEL. | | | | | | 9. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE ALL CALCULATIONS FOR | | | THE REQUIRED TREES FOR BUFFER SEGMENTS IN A PERIMETER | | | BUFFER REQUIREMENT CHART AND LIST LINEAR FOOTAGE OF | | | EACH PROPERTY LINE SEGMENT MEASURED ALONG THE | | | CENTERLINE OF EACH BUFFER CONTINUOUSLY. DUE TO THE | | | IRREGULAR SHAPE, EACH BUFFER LENGTH MAY BE DESIGNATED | | | WITH A LETTER, THEN CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED TREES | | | CALCULATED FOR EACH SEGMENT CALCULATED, ROUNDING UP FOR | | | ANY PORTION LEFT AFTER DIVIDING BY THE REQUIRED 30 FOOT | | | LENGTHS. SEE SECTION 94-443 (B) FOR THE BUFFERS | | | ADJACENT TO NON-RESIDENTIAL AND SECTION 94-443(A) FOR | | | BUFFERS ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL ZONING. | | | | | | BUFFER A IS 374 LINEAR FEET SO 13 TREES ARE REQUIRED. | | | SECTION 94-443(2) DOES NOT DEDUCT DRIVEWAY OPENINGS, IT | | | IS THE ENTIRE LENGTH THAT IS USED TO CALCULATE REQUIRED | | | BUFFER TREES. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. EXPLAIN THE REFERENCE TO THE 25? BUFFER. | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATION FOR BUFFER LENGTHS | | | WITH ACCESS DRIVEWAYS TO SHOW THEY DO NOT EXCEED 20% | | | INTERRUPTION FOR VEHICULAR ACCESS AS REQUIRED BY | | | SECTION 94-443(D)(1)A. | | | 25% PER 94-443(B)(2) IS THE CORRECT SECTION FOR | | | NONRESIDENTIAL. | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED LINEAR | | | FOOTAGE OF LANDSCAPE AREA ADJACENT TO EACH BUILDING. | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. MODIFY THE PLANT LIST TO ADD COLUMN FOR | | | DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVELS TO PROVIDE EASIER REFERENCE. | | | | | | 14. SATISFIED. ADD ANY RELOCATED OR EXISTING TREES AND | | | PALMS TO THE PLANT LIST AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE | | | REQUIRED TREES. | | | | | | 15. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A | | | MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO | | | BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING | | | AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE REQUIRED | | | NUMBER OF TREES AND THE PERCENTAGE OF CATEGORY 1 TREES | | | PROVIDED FOR THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS. | | | | | | 16. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING | | | AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND | | | LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH | | | SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4), FOLLOWING THE AREA | | | CLASSIFICATIONS AS SHOWN IN FIGURE XIV-1. | | | ? PARKING SPACES SHADED AS ONE AREA, SHOW TOTAL SPACES | | | TIMES 10 SQ FT PER SPACE. PROVIDE TOTAL | | | ? ALL OTHER PAVED AREAS SHADED DIFFERENTLY AND TOTAL | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE. DIVIDE BY 100 AND MULTIPLY BY 4 SQ FT. | | | PROVIDE TOTAL. | | | ? TOTAL THESE 2 SQUARE FOOTAGE AMOUNTS FOR THE REQUIRED | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE. | | | ? SHOW ALL INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREAS AS A DIFFERENT | | | SHADE AND SHOW PROVIDED SQUARE FOOTAGE. | | | | | | 17. SATISFIED. DIMENSION ALL INTERIOR AND TERMINAL | | | LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ON THE SITE PLAN TO SHOW THE MINIMUM | | | 8 FEET WIDTH OF THE LANDSCAPE AREA IS AT LEAST 8 FEET. | | | | | | 18. SATISFIED. TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND TREE IS | | | MISSING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER ADJACENT TO THE 20 FOOT | | | MAINTENANCE ACCESS. | | | | | | 19. SATISFIED. LANDSCAPE DIVIDER MEDIANS HAVE A | | | REQUIREMENT FOR TREES PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3)C. THE | | | INTENT IS TO PROVIDE SHADE OVER THE PAVED AREAS. | | | PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TREES AS PALMS DO NOT MEET THE | | | INTENT. | | | | | | 20. SATISFIED. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE | | | CHART TO ADD DESIGN OPTION 8 FOR THE REQUIRED MULCH AND | | | RECHECK THE 50% SOD AREA FOR THE PROVIDED LANDSCAPE | | | AREA. | | | | | | | | | 21. SATISFIED. THERE APPEAR TO BE CONFLICTS IN SEVERAL | | | LOCATIONS BETWEEN REQUIRED TREES IN LANDSCAPE ISLANDS | | | AND WATER AND SEWER LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. ADJUST | | | LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH | | | TREES. HYDRANTS, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS AND FDC | | | CONNECTIONS CANNOT INFRINGE ON THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE | | | AREAS INTENDED FOR THE TREES. | | | | | | 22. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND | | | SCREENING FOR ALL ABOVE GROUND UTILITY VALVES, BACKFLOW | | | PREVENTERS, A/C UNITS, AND FPL TRANSFORMERS. | | | COULD NOT LOCATE FPL TRANSFORMER LOCATIONS. | | | | | | 23. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE PERCENTAGE TO BASED ON THE | | | PLANT LIST TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. | | | PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT | | | MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | | | | ORDINANCE NO. 4146-08 DESIGN STANDARDS #12 LANDSCAPE | | | GUIDELINES: | | | | | | 24. SATISFIED. PROVIDE APPROVAL FROM THE CPD | | | ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD FOR THE FINAL LANDSCAPE AND | | | IRRIGATION PLANS. | | | | | | 25. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE 5 FOOT HEIGHT | | | FENCE AS REQUIRED ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 26. SATISFIED. BUFFER TREES ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL | | | ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE NEED TO BE LARGER SPECIES | | | THAN CLUSIA AND PIGEON PLUM TO MEET THE BUFFERING | | | INTENT OF THE LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 1/12/21: | | | | | | 27. ALL TREES PROVIDED MUST MEET THE 12 FOOT MINIMUM | | | HEIGHT. ADJUST PLANT LIST TO CORRECT PIGEON PLUM, | | | SILVER BUTTONWOOD, DAHOON HOLLY, CRAPE MYRTLE, AND | | | PLUMERIA FROM 8 FEET TO 12 FEET. | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-10-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
11-10-2020 |
Time |
15:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
11-10-2020 |
Time |
15:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-11-10 15:45:56 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: CONGRESS CROSSING CPD LOTS 6, 7, AND 8 - MAJOR | | | PD AMENDMENT Z20100014 | | | NOVEMBER 10, 2020 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE A TREE INVENTORY PLAN THAT HAS ALL TREE | | | NUMBERS CLEARLY VISIBLE. SOME ARE OBSCURED BY THE THICK | | | LINE REPRESENTING THE PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 2. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES AND | | | PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR | | | RELOCATED. LIVE AND LAUREL OAK TREES AND SABAL PALMS | | | ARE LISTED TO BE REMOVED THAT ARE INDICATED AS IN GOOD | | | CONDITION. PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS REPORT CONTAINING THE | | | METHOD OF DETERMINATION OF THE CONDITION AND RELOCATION | | | ASSESSMENT FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO | | | BE REMOVED. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE LOCATIONS FOR TREES WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE | | | PROPERTY LINE ON ADJACENT PARCELS AND ADJUST SPACING OF | | | PROPOSED TREES O AVOID CANOPY CONFLICTS PER SECTION | | | 94-442(B) (2)Q. | | | | | | | | | 4. IN THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CHART ON SHEET | | | LP-1.00, EXPLAIN THE NOTE ?(EXCLUDES LANDSCAPE WITHIN | | | PARKING LOT AREA)? UNDER GENERAL LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 5. UNDER NATURAL GRASS CORRECT THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE | | | AREA TO 15% FOR PD AND SHOW SQUARE FOOTAGE AND | | | PERCENTAGE OF GRASS PROPOSED. | | | | | | 6. EXPLAIN THE REASON FOR INCLUDING PLAZA DATA. | | | | | | 7. PROVIDE THE PERCENTAGE OF PALM SUBSTITUTIONS FOR | | | REQUIRED TREES NOT EXCEEDING 35% PER SECTION 94-442(D). | | | | | | 8. INDICATE THE 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER LOCATIONS ON | | | THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN ADJACENT TO ALL | | | PROPERTY LINES FOR THE PARCEL. | | | | | | 9. PROVIDE ALL CALCULATIONS FOR THE REQUIRED TREES FOR | | | BUFFER SEGMENTS IN A PERIMETER BUFFER REQUIREMENT CHART | | | AND LIST LINEAR FOOTAGE OF EACH PROPERTY LINE SEGMENT | | | MEASURED ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF EACH BUFFER | | | CONTINUOUSLY. DUE TO THE IRREGULAR SHAPE, EACH BUFFER | | | LENGTH MAY BE DESIGNATED WITH A LETTER, THEN | | | CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED TREES CALCULATED FOR EACH | | | SEGMENT CALCULATED, ROUNDING UP FOR ANY PORTION LEFT | | | AFTER DIVIDING BY THE REQUIRED 30 FOOT LENGTHS. SEE | | | SECTION 94-443 (B) FOR THE BUFFERS ADJACENT TO | | | NON-RESIDENTIAL AND SECTION 94-443(A) FOR BUFFERS | | | ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL ZONING. | | | | | | 10. EXPLAIN THE REFERENCE TO THE 25? BUFFER. | | | | | | 11. PROVIDE CALCULATION FOR BUFFER LENGTHS WITH ACCESS | | | DRIVEWAYS TO SHOW THEY DO NOT EXCEED 20% INTERRUPTION | | | FOR VEHICULAR ACCESS AS REQUIRED BY SECTION | | | 94-443(D)(1)A. | | | | | | 12. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED LINEAR FOOTAGE OF | | | LANDSCAPE AREA ADJACENT TO EACH BUILDING. | | | | | | 13. MODIFY THE PLANT LIST TO ADD COLUMN FOR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANCE LEVELS TO PROVIDE EASIER REFERENCE. | | | | | | 14. ADD ANY RELOCATED OR EXISTING TREES AND PALMS TO | | | THE PLANT LIST AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE REQUIRED | | | TREES. | | | | | | 15. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A MINIMUM OF 75 | | | PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED | | | WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING AREA SHALL | | | BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF | | | TREES AND THE PERCENTAGE OF CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED | | | FOR THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS. | | | | | | 16. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING AREA SURFACE | | | CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND LANDSCAPE AREAS | | | PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 94-443 | | | (C)(3) AND (4), FOLLOWING THE AREA CLASSIFICATIONS AS | | | SHOWN IN FIGURE XIV-1. | | | ? PARKING SPACES SHADED AS ONE AREA, SHOW TOTAL SPACES | | | TIMES 10 SQ FT PER SPACE. PROVIDE TOTAL | | | ? ALL OTHER PAVED AREAS SHADED DIFFERENTLY AND TOTAL | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE. DIVIDE BY 100 AND MULTIPLY BY 4 SQ FT. | | | PROVIDE TOTAL. | | | ? TOTAL THESE 2 SQUARE FOOTAGE AMOUNTS FOR THE REQUIRED | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE. | | | ? SHOW ALL INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREAS AS A DIFFERENT | | | SHADE AND SHOW PROVIDED SQUARE FOOTAGE. | | | | | | 17. DIMENSION ALL INTERIOR AND TERMINAL LANDSCAPE | | | ISLANDS ON THE SITE PLAN TO SHOW THE MINIMUM 8 FEET | | | WIDTH OF THE LANDSCAPE AREA IS AT LEAST 8 FEET. | | | | | | 18. TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND TREE IS MISSING AT THE | | | SOUTHWEST CORNER ADJACENT TO THE 20 FOOT MAINTENANCE | | | ACCESS. | | | | | | | | | 19. LANDSCAPE DIVIDER MEDIANS HAVE A REQUIREMENT FOR | | | TREES PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3)C. THE INTENT IS TO | | | PROVIDE SHADE OVER THE PAVED AREAS. PROVIDE THE | | | REQUIRED TREES AS PALMS DO NOT MEET THE INTENT. | | | | | | 20. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE CHART TO ADD | | | DESIGN OPTION 8 FOR THE REQUIRED MULCH AND RECHECK THE | | | 50% SOD AREA FOR THE PROVIDED LANDSCAPE AREA. | | | | | | | | | 21. THERE APPEAR TO BE CONFLICTS IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS | | | BETWEEN REQUIRED TREES IN LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND WATER | | | AND SEWER LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. ADJUST LOCATIONS | | | OF UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH TREES. | | | HYDRANTS, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS AND FDC CONNECTIONS | | | CANNOT INFRINGE ON THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS | | | INTENDED FOR THE TREES. | | | | | | 22. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND SCREENING FOR ALL ABOVE | | | GROUND UTILITY VALVES, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS, A/C UNITS, | | | AND FPL TRANSFORMERS. | | | | | | | | | 23. PROVIDE THE PERCENTAGE TO BASED ON THE PLANT LIST | | | TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT | | | SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL | | | ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT | | | SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF | | | SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA | | | WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA | | | LANDSCAPES. | | | | | | ORDINANCE NO. 4146-08 DESIGN STANDARDS #12 LANDSCAPE | | | GUIDELINES: | | | | | | 24. PROVIDE APPROVAL FROM THE CPD ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW | | | BOARD FOR THE FINAL LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLANS. | | | | | | 25. SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE 5 FOOT HEIGHT FENCE AS | | | REQUIRED ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 26. BUFFER TREES ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL ALONG THE EAST | | | PROPERTY LINE NEED TO BE LARGER SPECIES THAN CLUSIA AND | | | PIGEON PLUM TO MEET THE BUFFERING INTENT OF THE | | | LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES. | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-09-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
03-09-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
03-09-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-09 14:46:02 | NO FURHTER COMMENTS FROM DEPT OF PUBLIC WORKS. | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | [email protected] | | | 822-2045 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-21-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
12-21-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
12-21-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-12-21 14:37:32 | 1- DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL SHOWN ON THE REVISED SITE | | | PLAN, SHEET FSP-1, DOESN`T FULLY COMPLY WITH OUR LATEST | | | DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE SPECIFICATION . FOR A FREESTANDING | | | SITE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, THE ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY | | | WITH THE LATEST REVISION OF CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | GENERAL CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE STANDARD, GC-7. | | | 2- MISSING AUTO TURN (DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE TIRES | | | PATH) FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER TRUCK | | | WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECS: | | | - TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT | | | - TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT | | | - TURNING RADIUS: | | | - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT | | | - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT | | | - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT | | | | | | | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-10-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
11-10-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
11-10-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-11-10 10:21:32 | PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS: | | | 1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID | | | WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE AND TYPE OF | | | THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR) THAT WILL BE | | | UTILIZED THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION | | | SERVICE. | | | | | | 2- REVISED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS, SHEET A3.01, TO | | | REFLECT THE LATEST DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE SPECIFICATION. | | | FOR A FREESTANDING SITE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, THE | | | ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST REVISION OF CITY | | | OF WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE | | | ENCLOSURE STANDARD, GC-7. | | | | | | 3- AUTO TURN (DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE TIRES PATH) FOR | | | THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER TRUCK WITH THE | | | FOLLOWING SPECS: | | | - TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT | | | - TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT | | | - TURNING RADIUS: | | | - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT | | | - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT | | | - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-05-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
01-05-2021 |
Time |
15:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
01-05-2021 |
Time |
15:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-12-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
11-12-2020 |
Time |
12:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
11-12-2020 |
Time |
12:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-11-12 12:45:15 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. THE CITY'S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD1929. THE | | | SURVEY USES NAVD1988. THE CITY HAS ALLOWED NAVD1988 | | | PROVIDED THE CONVERSION BETWEEN NAVD1988 AND NGVD1929 | | | IS LISTED. | | | | | | 2. CONSIDER PROVIDING A DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR THE | | | EXISTING DRAINAGE PIPE THAT WAS CONSTRUCTED OUTSIDE THE | | | PLATTED EASEMENT BETWEEN THE CUL DE SAC AND WATER | | | MANAGEMENT AREA. | | | | | | 3. NORTH DRIVEWAY IS NOT SHOWN CONNECTING TO THE | | | STREET. WHY IS THERE NOT SIDEWALK BEING CONSTRUCTED | | | ALONG THE ENTIRE STREET FRONTAGE? | | | | | | 4. INDICATE HOW MUCH CURB AND GUTTER WILL BE REPLACED. | | | | | | 5. PROPOSED RETAINING WALL ALONG THE SOUTHEAST PROPERTY | | | LINE SHOULD HAVE REMOVABLE SECTION OVER THE DRAINAGE | | | PIPE. | | | | | | 6. CONSIDER REDUCING THE PARKING STALL DEPTHS BY | | | INCORPORATING A 2' LANDSCAPED OVERHANG. | | | | | | 7. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP | | | CRITERIA. CONFIRM PROPOSED GRADING PLAN IS IN | | | CONFORMANCE WITH THE ORIGINAL DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS FOR | | | THE MASTER DRAINAGE SYSTEM [CAN BE PROVIDED WITH THE | | | ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL]. | | | | | | 8. CONFIRM THERE IS ADEQUATE SPACE BETWEEN THE | | | RETAINING WALL AND LAKE TO MAINTAIN THE OFFSITE LAKE. | | | | | | 9. MOUNTABLE CURB NEEDED TO ACCESS THE 20' ACCESS | | | EASEMENT AT WEST END OF THE RETAINING WALL. | | | | | | | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | | | | 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED | | | WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP MODIFICATION AND | | | DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
04-02-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
04-02-2021 |
Time |
10:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-04-02 10:24:36 | PASSED WITH CONDITIONS: | | | | | | 1. UNITY OF TITLE FOR ALL 3 LOTS PRIOR TO BUILDING | | | PERMIT. APPLICATION IS MADE THROUGH ENGINEERING. | | | 2. IF REPLAT IS APPLIED FOR AT A LATER DATE, UNITY OF | | | TITLE WILL NEED TO BE RELEASED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-26-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
02-26-2021 |
Time |
07:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-02-26 08:19:17 | 1. SURVEY NEEDS TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED. | | | 2. PLEASE EXPLAIN. UNSURE AS TO THIS RESPONSE" | | | | | | WILL REPLAT CREATE A NEW PHASE 3 LOT? | | | RESPONSE: YES, THE APPLICANT WILL SEEK UNITY OF CONTROL | | | AFTER OWNERSHIP IS CHANGED AND A REPLAT WILL CREATE A | | | NEW PARCEL FOR FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS | | | | | | 3. NEED TERMINATION OF 22' ACCESS EASEMENT TO POA AND | | | APPROVAL OF POA OF IMPROVEMENTS IN 12' ACCESS EASEMENT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-04-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
01-04-2021 |
Time |
08:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-01-04 08:55:10 | 1.WAITING ON REVISED SURVEY BASED ON TITLE SEARCH. | | | 2. ARE PROJECT LIMITS NOW BEING MODIFIED TO REMOVE | | | PHASE 3? | | | 3. WILL REPLAT CREATE A NEW PHASE 3 LOT? |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-10-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
11-10-2020 |
Time |
08:50 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-11-10 08:45:32 | 1. UNITY OF TITLE WILL BE REQUIRED IF ALL 3 BUILDINGS | | | ARE PROPOSED TO REMAIN UNDER ONE OWNERSHIP. | | | 2. OUTFALL LIES OUTSIDE OF PLATTED DRAINAGE | | | EASEMENT.NEW EASEMENT TO POA WILL NEED TO BE GRANTED. | | | 3. SHOW EXISTING FORCE MAIN ALONG EAST PROPERTY LINE. | | | 4. SHOW CONVERSION TO NGVD-29 ON SURVEY. | | | 5. SHOW 12' UE AS PER ORB/PG ON LOT 7. | | | 6. THE PROPOSED 12' UE FOR THE SANITARY SEWER WILL BE | | | PRIVATE. THE POINT OF CONNECTION WILL BE AT THE R/W | | | LINE. | | | 7. CUSTOMER SERVICE WILL REQUIRE METERS AND BACKFLOWS | | | TO BE LOCATED AT R/W LINE. | | | | | | ADDED 11.16.2020: | | | 1. SURVEY NEEDS TO BE BASED ON A TITLE SEARCH. A | | | PREVIOUS SURVEY SHOWING ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS WAS | | | FORWARDED TO ALANA TODAY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-05-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
03-05-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-05 18:21:17 | NO FURTHER COMMENTS. | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-15-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
01-15-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-01-15 14:55:33 | 1. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER. | | | RESPONSE: A COPY OF THE COUNTY TPS LETTER HAS BEEN | | | PROVIDED AS REQUESTED. | | | COMMENT: OK. PLEASE PROVIDE COUNTY'S DRIVEWAY ACCESS | | | APPROVAL NOTIFICATION/LETTER, ONCE AVAILABLE. | | | | | | 2. INDEPENDENTLY FROM COUNTY APPROVAL AND VESTED TRIPS | | | GENERATION, A FULL TRAFFIC STUDY BASED ON COUNTY'S | | | TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY GUIDELINES (E.G. RDI, TEST 1, TEST | | | 2, ETC.) IS REQUIRED. THAT IS DUE TO SIGNIFICANT | | | CHANGES TO TRAFFIC CONDITIONS AND SURROUNDING | | | DEVELOPMENTS SINCE THE LATEST SITE PLAN APPROVAL. | | | RESPONSE: THE ECF CORPORATE OFFICE AT MAJESTIC PLAZA | | | PROJECT IS PROPOSING 45,000 SF OF PROFESSIONAL OFFICE | | | BUILDINGS WHICH WILL REPLACE THE 64,430 SF OF | | | DEVELOPMENT APPROVED UNDER ORDINANCE 1762-84. THE | | | PROPOSED REQUEST TO REPLACE THE 64,430 SF OF | | | DEVELOPMENT APPROVED UNDER ORDINANCE 1762-84 WITH | | | 45,000 SF OF PROFESSIONAL OFFICE WILL GENERATE LESS | | | TRAFFIC THAN WHAT IS CURRENTLY VESTED FOR THE SITE. | | | THEREFORE, A TRAFFIC STUDY IS NOT REQUIRED. | | | COMMENT: A REDUCTION IN NUMBER OF VESTED TRIPS IS NOT | | | SUFFICIENT TO WAVE THE FULL TRAFFIC STUDY REQUIREMENT. | | | AS CURRENT EXISTING CONDITIONS HAVE SIGNIFICANTLY | | | CHANGED SINCE THE FIRST ORDINANCE DATED 1984, AND THE | | | LATEST ONE, DATED 2008. MOREOVER, AN INCREASE IN DEADLY | | | INCIDENTS IN RECENT MONTHS ALONG N CONGRESS AVENUE | | | WARRANTS FURTHER SCRUTINY OF ANY PROJECTS THAT WOULD | | | INCREASE VEHICULAR TRAFFIC AND COULD SIGNIFICANTLY | | | IMPACT THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK WITHIN THE RADIUS OF | | | DEVELOPMENT INFLUENCE. THUS, EXACERBATING INCIDENTS | | | STATISTICS. PLEASE ADDRESS THE ORIGINAL COMMENT | | | ACCORDINGLY. ALSO PROVIDE A CRASH STUDY INCLUSIVE OF | | | COLLISION DIAGRAMS AT LOCATIONS WHERE DEADLY INCIDENTS | | | HAVE BEEN REPORTED IN THE PAST 5 YEARS. | | | | | | 3. IF PARKING AREAS ARE BUILT IN PHASES, PROVIDE | | | PARKING CONFIGURATIONS DURING EACH OF THE CONSTRUCTION | | | PHASES FOR SAKE OF DESIGN COMPLIANCE AND PROPER | | | VEHICULAR CIRCULATION. | | | RESPONSE: THE DEVELOPMENT IS NO LONGER PROPOSED TO BE | | | BUILT IN PHASES. | | | COMMENT: OK | | | | | | 4. PROVIDE BICYCLE RACKS NEARBY BUILDING ENTRANCES. | | | INSERT NUMBER OF BICYCLE STALLS PROVIDED IN THE SITE | | | DATA TABLE. | | | RESPONSE: BICYCLE PARKING HAS BEEN PROVIDED AS | | | REQUESTED AT NEARBY BUILDING ENTRANCES, AND THE NUMBER | | | OF STALLS HAS BEEN INCLUDED | | | COMMENT: OK | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-11-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
11-11-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-11-11 17:57:44 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS: | | | 1) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | 2) INDEPENDENTLY FROM COUNTY APPROVAL AND VESTED TRIPS | | | GENERATION, A FULL TRAFFIC STUDY BASED ON COUNTY'S | | | TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY GUIDELINES (E.G. RDI, TEST 1, TEST | | | 2, ETC.) IS REQUIRED. THAT IS DUE TO SIGNIFICANT | | | CHANGES TO TRAFFIC CONDITIONS AND SURROUNDING | | | DEVELOPMENTS SINCE THE LATEST SITE PLAN APPROVAL | | | 3) IF PARKING AREAS ARE BUILT IN PHASES, PROVIDE | | | PARKING CONFIGURATIONS DURING EACH OF THE CONSTRUCTION | | | PHASES FOR SAKE OF DESIGN COMPLIANCE AND PROPER | | | VEHICULAR CIRCULATION | | | 4) PROVIDE BICYCLE RACKS NEARBY BUILDING ENTRANCES. | | | INSERT NUMBER OF BICYCLE STALLS PROVIDED IN THE SITE | | | DATA TABLE | | | | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-21-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kdefranc |
Date |
06-21-2022 |
Time |
16:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kdefranc |
Date |
06-21-2022 |
Time |
16:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-06-21 16:20:58 | PASSED | | | | | | PLEASE REFER TO FORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW/MINOR AMENDMENT | | | (PB 692W) APPROVAL LETTER ISSUED ON JUNE 22, 2021 FOR | | | THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. | | | | | | KEVIE DEFRANC | | | PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-1449 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-09-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
03-09-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
03-09-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-09 16:06:43 | CONGRESS CROSSING | | | COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT | | | PB 692W - Z20100014 | | | MAJOR AMENDMENT | | | 4400 BEACON CIRCLE | | | | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE FOR ADDITIONAL RESUBMITTALS, THE APPLICANT | | | WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE | | | 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. PLEASE ADDRESS ALL | | | COMMENTS THROUGH A WRITTEN RESPONSE. | | | | | | APPLICATION DOCUMENTS | | | | | | PROVIDE LETTERS FROM ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES CONFIRMING | | | THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR | | | EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF | | | THEIR SERVICES FOR AT & T, FLORIDA PUBLIC UTILITIES, FP | | | & L. (PARTIALLY SATISFIED. STILL WAITING FOR THE LETTER | | | FROM FPUC.) | | | | | | THE JUSTIFICATION LETTER STATES IN THE FLOOR AREA | | | RATIO TABLE THAT THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT FOR LOT 8 IS 2 | | | STORIES, ORDINANCE # 4146-08 INDICATES THE MAXIMUM | | | HEIGHT IS 3 STORIES. (SATISFIED.) | | | | | | SITE PLAN | | | | | | | | | PROVIDE THE UNITY OF TITLE JOINING LOT 6, 7 AND 8. | | | (ACKNOWLEDGED) | | | THE UNITY OF TITLE IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO CO. (NEW | | | COMMENT) | | | | | | PLEASE GIVE MORE INFORMATION ON THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT. WHAT IS THE TIMEFRAME? THE JUSTIFICATION | | | LETTER SPEAKS OF CONSTRUCTION OF THREE (3) BUILDINGS | | | (IN DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM), YOUR RESPONSE TO COMMENTS | | | STATE THIS IS NOT A PHASED DEVELOPMENT, YET BUILDING 2 | | | WILL NOT BE CONSTRUCTED UNTIL A LATER TIME AND THE | | | THIRD BUILDING HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM SITE PLAN AND THE | | | AREA IS | | | LABELED VACANT LOT FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT. THE VACANT | | | AREA WHERE BUILDING 3 IS PROPOSED WILL NEED TO BE | | | SODDED UNTIL DEVELOPED. (SATISFIED) | | | | | | CONSIDER: CONSTRUCTING THE ENTIRE PARKING LOT AND | | | LEAVE PADS FOR THE BUILDINGS TO BE CONSTRUCTED. THIS | | | WILL HELP WITH THE FUNCTIONALITY AND FLOW OF TRAFFIC | | | THROUGH THE PARKING LOT DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | (ACKNOWLEDGED AND SATISFIED.) | | | | | | PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING WITH CITY APPROVED BICYCLE | | | RACK. (SATISFIED) | | | WHICH ONE OF THE CITYS APPROVED BICYCLE RACK DESIGNS | | | ARE YOU PROPOSING? (INVERTED U, A, OR POST LOOP) | | | (SATISFIED) | | | | | | SIGNAGE REQUIRES A SEPARATE PERMIT. (ACKNOWLEDGED) | | | | | | NOW WITH THE RETENTION WALL NOT BEING REQUIRED, | | | CONSIDER TREATING THIS AREA ALONG THE SOUTHEAST | | | PROPERTY LINE BY ADDING HEDGES TO BLOCK THE POTENTIAL | | | GLARE FROM HEADLIGHTS ON THE RESIDENTIAL AREA ACROSS | | | THE CANAL. (SATISFIED) | | | | | | | | | ALANA WOOTEN | | | PLANNER | | | PLANNING DIVISION | | | 561-822-1449 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-15-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
01-15-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
01-15-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-01-15 13:17:12 | CONGRESS CROSSING | | | COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT | | | PB 692W - Z20100014 | | | MAJOR AMENDMENT | | | 4400 BEACON CIRCLE | | | | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE FOR ADDITIONAL RESUBMITTALS, THE APPLICANT | | | WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE | | | 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. PLEASE ADDRESS ALL | | | COMMENTS THROUGH A WRITTEN RESPONSE. | | | | | | APPLICATION DOCUMENTS | | | | | | PROVIDE LETTERS FROM ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES CONFIRMING | | | THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR | | | EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF | | | THEIR SERVICES FOR AT & T, FLORIDA PUBLIC UTILITIES, FP | | | & L. (UNSATISFIED. DID NOT FIND THEM IN THE RESUBMITTAL | | | PACKAGE.) | | | | | | THE JUSTIFICATION LETTER STATES IN THE FLOOR AREA | | | RATIO TABLE THAT THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT FOR LOT 8 IS 2 | | | STORIES, ORDINANCE # 4146-08 INDICATES THE MAXIMUM | | | HEIGHT IS 3 STORIES. (UNSATISFIED. CORRECTION STILL | | | OUTSTANDING IN THE JUSTIFICATION LETTER, UNDER FLOOR | | | AREA RATIO TABLE.) | | | | | | SITE PLAN | | | | | | PROVIDE THE UNITY OF TITLE JOINING LOT 6, 7 AND 8. | | | (ACKNOWLEDGED) | | | | | | PLEASE GIVE MORE INFORMATION ON THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT. WHAT IS THE TIMEFRAME? THE JUSTIFICATION | | | LETTER SPEAKS OF CONSTRUCTION OF THREE (3) BUILDINGS | | | (IN DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM), YOUR RESPONSE TO COMMENTS | | | STATE THIS IS NOT A PHASED DEVELOPMENT, YET BUILDING 2 | | | WILL NOT BE CONSTRUCTED UNTIL A LATER TIME AND THE | | | THIRD BUILDING HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM SITE PLAN AND THE | | | AREA | | | IS LABELED VACANT LOT FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT. THE | | | VACANT AREA WHERE BUILDING 3 IS PROPOSED WILL NEED TO | | | BE SODDED UNTIL DEVELOPED. (NEW COMMENT) | | | | | | CONSIDER: CONSTRUCTING THE ENTIRE PARKING LOT AND | | | LEAVE PADS FOR THE BUILDINGS TO BE CONSTRUCTED. THIS | | | WILL HELP WITH THE FUNCTIONALITY AND FLOW OF TRAFFIC | | | THROUGH THE PARKING LOT DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | (ACKNOWLEDGED) | | | | | | PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING WITH CITY APPROVED BICYCLE | | | RACK. | | | | | | WHICH ONE OF THE CITYS APPROVED BICYCLE RACK DESIGNS | | | ARE YOU PROPOSING? (INVERTED U, A, OR POST LOOP) (NEW | | | COMMENT) | | | | | | SIGNAGE REQUIRES A SEPARATE PERMIT. (ACKNOWLEDGED) | | | | | | NOW WITH THE RETENTION WALL NOT BEING REQUIRED, | | | CONSIDER TREATING THIS AREA ALONG THE SOUTHEAST | | | PROPERTY LINE BY ADDING HEDGES TO BLOCK THE POTENTIAL | | | GLARE FROM HEADLIGHTS ON THE RESIDENTIAL AREA ACROSS | | | THE CANAL. (NEW COMMENT) | | | | | | PROVIDE A DETAIL OF SCREEN WALL. (ACKNOWLEDGED) | | | | | | | | | ALANA WOOTEN | | | PLANNER | | | PLANNING DIVISION | | | 561-822-1449 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-10-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
11-10-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
11-10-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-11-10 15:27:10 | CONGRESS CROSSING COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PB | | | 692W | | | MAJOR AMENDMENT | | | 4400 BEACON CIRCLE | | | | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. FOR ADDITIONAL | | | RESUBMITTALS, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A | | | RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL | | | APPLICATION FEE. PLEASE ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS THROUGH A | | | WRITTEN RESPONSE. | | | | | | ******************************************************* | | | ******************************************************* | | | ******************************************************* | | | ******************************************************* | | | ***************************** | | | | | | APPLICATION DOCUMENTS | | | | | | PROVIDE LETTERS FROM ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES CONFIRMING | | | THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR | | | EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF | | | THEIR SERVICES FOR AT & T, FLORIDA PUBLIC UTILITIES, FP | | | & L. | | | | | | THE JUSTIFICATION LETTER STATES IN THE FLOOR AREA | | | RATIO TABLE THAT THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT FOR LOT 8 IS 2 | | | STORIES, ORDINANCE # 4146-08 INDICATES THE MAXIMUM | | | HEIGHT IS 3 STORIES. | | | | | | THE JUSTIFICATION LETTER STATES IN THE FLOOR AREA | | | RATIO TABLE THAT THE PROPOSED TOTAL FAR FOR LOTS 6, 7 | | | AND 8 IS .22. IN THE STANDARD FOR CODE COMPLIANCE UNDER | | | A, INDICATES THAT THE PROPOSED FAR AS .28. PROJECT FACT | | | SHEET, SITE PLAN, ETC. ALL SAY 0.28 AS WELL. | | | | | | PROVIDE THE TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY APPROVAL. | | | | | | SITE PLAN | | | | | | PROVIDE THE UNITY OF TITLE JOINING LOT 6, 7 AND 8. | | | | | | PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON THE DETAILS OF THE PHASED | | | BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. WILL THE PARKING BE PHASED AS | | | WELL? WHAT IS THE TIMELINE? IF THE PARKING LOT IS | | | PROPOSED TO BE PHASED, THE PLAN DOES NOT WORK AS THE | | | PHASE LINES GO DOWN THE MIDDLE OF THE DRIVE AISLES AND | | | PARKING SPACES AND CREATES DEAD-END PARKING ROWS THAT | | | WOULD NECESSITATE A TURN-AROUND. | | | | | | CONSIDER: CONSTRUCTING THE ENTIRE PARKING LOT AND | | | LEAVE PADS FOR THE BUILDINGS TO BE CONSTRUCTED. THIS | | | WILL HELP WITH THE FUNCTIONALITY AND FLOW OF TRAFFIC | | | THROUGH THE PARKING LOT DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | PROVIDE THE FRONT SETBACK FOR BUILDING 2. | | | | | | PROVIDE THE SETBACK FOR BUILDING 2 ALONG DRAINAGE AND | | | UTILITY EASEMENT. (ORD # 4003-06) | | | | | | PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS OF ALL DRIVE AISLES IN PARKING | | | LOT. | | | | | | PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING WITH CITY APPROVED BICYCLE | | | RACK AND ADD TO INFORMATION TABLE WITH PARKING | | | INFORMATION. (ONE (1) BICYCLE SPACE FOR EVERY 20 | | | AUTOMOBILE SPACE OR A FRACTION OF.) PLEASE SEE THE CITY | | | DETAIL ON BICYCLE RACKS. | | | | | | SIGNAGE REQUIRES A SEPARATE PERMIT. | | | | | | EXTEND THE SCREEN WALL AROUND ALONG THE SOUTHEAST | | | PROPERTY LINE (ADJACENT TO THE PARKING LOT). A GATE | | | WOULD BE NEEDED FOR THE MAINTENANCE ACCESS. | | | | | | THE COMPACT PARKING DETAIL DOES NOT MEET THE CITY'S | | | ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. IT SHOWS | | | SINGLE-STRIPING. | | | | | | PROVIDE AN ENLARGED TYPICAL DETAIL OF DOUBLE-STRIPING | | | OF THE PARKING STALL TO ENSURE CORRECT DIMENSIONS. | | | | | | PROVIDE PHOTOMETRIC PLANS. | | | | | | PROVIDE APPROVAL BY THE CONGRESS CROSSINGS | | | ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD. | | | | | | CONSIDER: IN THOSE LOCATIONS WHERE PARKING IS ADJACENT | | | TO A LANDSCAPED AREA, SHORTEN THE SPACE TO 16 FEET, | | | ELIMINATE THE WHEEL STOP, AND ALLOW THE 2-FOOT OVERHANG | | | TO OCCUR OVER THE ADJACENT LANDSCAPE AREA. | | | | | | THE AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE LISTED IS INCORRECT. | | | | | | PROVIDE A DETAIL OF SCREEN WALL. | | | | | | PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION OF RETAINING WALL AREA | | | ADJACENT TO RETENTION TRACT. | | | | | | THE CENTRAL PARKING AREA TO THE WEST OF BUILDING #1 | | | COULD PROBABLY BE REDESIGNED TO ELIMINATE THE DRIVE | | | AISLE THAT RUNS THROUGH THE MIDDLE. IT APPEARS TO BE A | | | LOT OF CONFLICT WITH CROSSING. IF IT IS TO REMAIN, STOP | | | BARS ARE PROBABLY NEEDED (SEE ASSOCIATED IMAGE) | | | | | | | | | ALANA WOOTEN | | | PLANNER | | | PLANNING DIVISION | | | 561-822-1449 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |