Plan Review Details - Project Z20100012
Plan Review Stops For Project Z20100012
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 11-10-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 11-10-2020 Time 19:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 11-10-2020 Time 19:17 Sent To  
Notes
2020-11-10 19:18:04NO COMMENTS ON PROPOSED ALLEY ABANDONMENT.
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-05-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 05-05-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 05-05-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-05 14:19:48TO BE REVIEWED UNDER FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL.
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 05-06-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 05-06-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 05-06-2021 Time 13:50 Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-06 13:51:20FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES.
  
 FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES NOT
 CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT THE
 APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 11-04-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 11-04-2020 Time 10:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 11-04-2020 Time 10:50 Sent To  
Notes
2020-11-04 10:51:08FIRE HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED AND APPROVES.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status P Date 05-08-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 05-08-2021 Time 09:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 05-08-2021 Time 09:28 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-12-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 11-12-2020 Time 12:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 11-12-2020 Time 12:24 Sent To  
Notes
2020-11-12 12:24:16THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW OF THE ALLEY
 ABANDONMENT AND PLAT.
  
 1. THE CITY?S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD1929. THE
 SURVEY USES NAVD1988. THE CITY HAS ALLOWED NAVD1988
 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION BETWEEN NAVD1988 AND NGVD1929
 IS LISTED.
  
 2. WHY THE 0.10? JOG IN THE BOUNDARY OF PROPOSED LOT 3
 AT THE ALLEY. IT IS NOT SHOWN ON THE PLAT SHEET.
  
 3. BOTH PAGES OF THE LOT 3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND SKETCH
 ARE LABELED SHEET 1 OF 2.
  
 4. EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERN TO BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN
 THE ALLEY AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE OF LOT 3.
  
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 05-05-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 05-05-2021 Time 12:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-05 13:29:39REVIEW ALSO INCLUDES Z20100013.
  
 1. WATER MAIN ALONG WEST LINE OF 2501 S FLAGLER STILL
 NEEDS TO BE LOCATED. THIS MAY REQUIRE A 10' UE.
 2. IN DISCUSSION WITH PLANNING, THE ABANDONMENT OF THE
 ALLEY AND UNDERLYING EASEMENTS WILL BE BY PLAT.
 3. PER CODE AND WITH OTHER PLATS REQUIRING UTILITY
 SERVICES, ANY UTILITY WORK WILL NEED TO BE BONDED. THE
 BOND IS 110% OF
 THE ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE BASED ON APPROVED
 ENGINEERING PLANS. THE BOND IS REQUIRED BEFORE THE PLAT
 GOES TO CITY COMMISSION FOR APPROVAL.
 4. UTILITY SIGN-OFF LETTERS ARE NEEDED FOR BOTH THE
 ALLEY AND THE EXISTING N-S 5' UE. THE E-W 5' UE WILL
 REMAIN.
 5. EXISTING CCTV OF PERSHING HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO RICK
 REIKENIS FOR REVIEW.
 6. SEPARATE PLAT COMMENTS LETTER WILL BE ISSUED AFTER
 PLAN IS FINALIZED.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-10-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 11-10-2020 Time 07:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-11-10 08:21:461. THIS REVIEW IS ALSO FOR Z20100013 - MINOR
 SUBDIVISION.
 2. SITE PLAN DIMENSIONS DO NOT MATCH HISTORIC BOARD
 APPROVAL PLAN.
 3. THE EXISTING 5' UE'S ON LOT 3 WILL ALSO NEED
 ABANDONED. UTILITY SIGN-OFF LETTERS WILL BE REQUIRED.
 4. EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE AND WATER MAIN NEED TO
 BE FIELD LOCATED AND SURVEYED TO DETERMINE IF WITHIN
 EXISTING EASEMENTS.
 5. NEW EASEMENTS FOR WATER AND SEWER ARE REQUIRED TO BE
 10' IN WIDTH AND CAN BE DEDICATED BY PLAT.
 6. AN ENGINEERING PLAN WILL NEED TO BE SUBMITTED TO
 SHOW THAT THE SANITARY SEWER CAN BE RELOCATED. THE CITY
 IS CURRENTLY EVALUATING THE LIFT STATION ON PERSHING
 WAY.
 7. APPRAISAL WILL BE REQUIRED. PLEASE PROVIDE A CHECK
 IN THE AMOUNT OF $1800.00 MADE PAYABLE TO ANDERSON &
 CARR. CITY WILL THEN ORDER APPRAISAL.
 8. PLEASE NOTE THAT APPRAISAL OF ALLEY IS BASED ON AN
 "ACROSS THE FENCE" EVALUATION BASED ON CURRENT LAND
 VALUES.
 9. A SEPARATE PLAT REVIEW COMMENTS LETTER WILL BE
 ISSUED. SIDEWALK EASEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EXISTING
 SIDEWALK ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE.
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT THE ALLEY WAS CREATED BY THE EL CID
 2ND ADDITION PLAT AND, IF ABANDONED, WILL TRANSFER TO
 THE 2501 S FLAGLER PROPERTY. IT DOES NOT GET SPLIT
 BETWEEN THE ADJOINING PROPERTIES.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 04-29-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 04-29-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-04-29 20:03:40THIS REVIEW IS ALSO FOR Z20100013
 PASSED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
 1) A CORNER CLIP DEDICATION AND/OR ADJUSTMENT OF THE
 PROPERTY WALL IS NEEDED TO FULFILL VISIBILITY TRIANGLE
 COMPLIANCE AT THE PERSHING WAY AND S FLAGLER
 INTERSECTION. THE CORNER CLIP SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 REVISED ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN WHEN THE BUILDING
 PERMIT FOR THE WORK ON THAT LOT IS APPLIED FOR.
 2) PROVIDE DETAILS OF PROPOSED NEW DRIVEWAY(S) ONCE
 IMPROVEMENTS TO THE NEWLY CREATED LOTS ARE SUBMITTED
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-11-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 11-11-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-11-11 17:44:56TRAFFIC COMMENTS
 1) THIS REVIEW IS ALSO FOR Z20100013 ? MINOR
 SUBDIVISION
 2) A CORNER CLIP DEDICATION AND/OR ADJUSTMENT OF THE
 PROPERTY WALL ARE NEEDED TO FULFILL VISIBILITY TRIANGLE
 COMPLIANCE AT THE PERSHING WAY AND S FLAGLER
 INTERSECTION
 3) PROVIDE DETAILS OF PROPOSED NEW DRIVEWAY(S), IF ANY
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 05-11-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 05-11-2021 Time 10:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 05-10-2021 Time 16:17 Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-11 10:35:19PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 05.11.2021
 PROJECT NO.: Z20100012 & Z20100013
 CASE NO.: PB 1868 & 1869
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - THE APPLICATION SHOULD BE
 FOR A MINOR SUBDIVISION (REPLAT) ? IT APPEARS THAT
 MATERIALS SUBMITTED WERE THOSE REQUIRED FOR A LOT SPLIT
 ALONG EXISTING PLATTED LOT LINES. AS THE SUBDIVISION IS
 CREATING NEW LOT LINES, A REPLAT IT REQUIRED.
  
 1.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - NEED ALL REQUIRED DOCUMENTS FOR
 MAILING. SEE SECTION G (PAGE 4) OF THE DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION. NOTE THAT SIGN POSTING WILL ALSO BE
 REQUIRED, AND SHALL BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 15 DAYS IN
 ADVANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION HEARING. LANGUAGE AND
 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SIGN WILL BE PROVIDED BY CITY
 STAFF ONCE IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED WITH CITY COMMISSION
 AGENDA IT WILL BE SCHEDULED FOR.
  
 2. [ SATISFIED ] - IT LOOKS LIKE A REPLAT WAS PREPARED
 (IN ADDITION TO THE LOT SPLIT DOCUMENTS) BUT ONLY PAGE
 2 OF THE PLAT WAS PROVIDED. THE LOT SPLIT DOCUMENTS ARE
 NOT NEEDED, AND A FULL PLAT PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 FLORIDA STATUTES NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED.
  
 3. [ SATISFIED ] - THERE'S INCONSISTENCY IN THE LOT
 DIMENSIONS BETWEEN THE SITE PLAN APPROVED BY THE
 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD AND THE PROPOSED
 SUBDIVISION. ENSURE THAT THE SITE PLAN, PROPOSED PLAT,
 ETC. ARE ALL ACCURATE AND CONSISTENT, AND ENSURE THAT
 ALL ZONING AND HPB REQUIREMENTS CONTINUE TO BE MET.
  
 4. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - THE PROPOSED PLAT SHALL
 NOT CREATE ANY NEW NONCONFORMITIES. ACCORDING TO THE
 PLAT, IT APPEARS THAT THE PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN LOTS 1
 AND 2 WOULD RESULT IN THE NONCOMPLIANCE WITH THE
 REQUIRED POOL SETBACK ASSOCIATED WITH THE EXISTING POOL
 ON LOT 1. THE SITE PLAN, HOWEVER, SHOWS THE EXISTING
 POOL MEETING THIS SETBACK REQUIREMENT.
  
 4.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE PLAT FOR
 APPROVAL BY THE CITY COMMISSION, ALL OF THE FOLLOWING
 SHALL BE REMOVED:
  
  A) POOL AND POOL DECK ON CURRENT LOT 17 (TO COMPLY
 WITH SETBACK REQUIREDMENTS).
  B) POOL AND POOL DECK IN ITS ENTIRETY ON CURRENT LOTS
 29-30 (ACCESSORY STRUCTURES NOT PERMITTED ON A LOT
 WITHOUT A PRIMARY STRUCTURE).
  C) GREENHOUSE AND 1-STORY BUILDING ON LOT 29
 (ACCESSORY STRUCTURES NOT PERMITTED ON A LOT WITHOUT A
 PRIMARY STRUCTURE).
  
 5. [ SATISFIED - SUBJECT TO REVIEW DURING PERMITTING ]
 - NOTE THAT FOR LOT 3, IF TWO (2) CURB-CUTS ARE
 PROPOSED, EACH OF THEM SHALL NOT EXCEED TEN (10) FEET
 IN WIDTH. ADDITIONALLY, A MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT, OR
 1,000 SQUARE FEET (WHICHEVER IS LESS) OF THE FRONT YARD
 SHALL CONSIST OF LANDSCAPING.
  
 6. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - IT IS THE CITY?S POLICY
 THAT ABANDONMENT OF ALLEYS REQUIRE THE APPRAISAL OF THE
 LAND, THE VALUE OF WHICH IS TO BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY
 IN EXCHANGE FOR THE ALLEY NO LONGER BEING AVAILABLE FOR
 USE BY THE PUBLIC. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH VINCE NOEL,
 ENGINEERING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT MANAGER.
  
 6.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - PAYMENT OF THE APPRAISED VALUE
 SHALL BE PROVIDED PRIOR SCHEDULING THE PLAT FOR
 APPROVAL BY THE CITY COMMISSION
  
 7. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - THE LETTER FROM FPL
 INDICATES THAT EASEMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED TO COVER
 EXISTING FACILITIES. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF
 THE FACILITIES AND WHAT EASEMENTS WILL BE DEDICATED.
 DEPENDING UPON THE LOCATION OF THE FUTURE EASEMENTS,
 SOME OF THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS MAY NEED TO BE
 RELOCATED.
  
 7.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - THE FPL IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE
 COVERED BY THE NEW UTILITY EASEMENTS REQUIRED BY THE
 CITY, SO NO FURTHER ACTION SHOULD BE NEEDED ON THIS
 MATTER.
  
 8. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - A LETTER OF NO OBJECTION STILL
 NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED FROM THE CITY'S ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT REGARDING THE ABANDONMENT OF THE
 ALLEY.
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) PDFS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 F) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT
 DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE
 COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-12-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 11-12-2020 Time 11:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 11-12-2020 Time 11:17 Sent To  
Notes
2020-11-12 11:18:07PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 11.12.2020
 PROJECT NO.: Z20100012 & Z20100013
 CASE NO.: PB 1868 & 1869
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. THE APPLICATION SHOULD BE FOR A MINOR SUBDIVISION
 (REPLAT) ? IT APPEARS THAT MATERIALS SUBMITTED WERE
 THOSE REQUIRED FOR A LOT SPLIT ALONG EXISTING PLATTED
 LOT LINES. AS THE SUBDIVISION IS CREATING NEW LOT
 LINES, A REPLAT IT REQUIRED.
  
 2. IT LOOKS LIKE A REPLAT WAS PREPARED (IN ADDITION TO
 THE LOT SPLIT DOCUMENTS) BUT ONLY PAGE 2 OF THE PLAT
 WAS PROVIDED. THE LOT SPLIT DOCUMENTS ARE NOT NEEDED,
 AND A FULL PLAT PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA
 STATUTES NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED.
  
 3. THERE?S INCONSISTENCY IN THE LOT DIMENSIONS BETWEEN
 THE SITE PLAN APPROVED BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION
 BOARD AND THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION. ENSURE THAT THE
 SITE PLAN, PROPOSED PLAT, ETC. ARE ALL ACCURATE AND
 CONSISTENT?AND ENSURE THAT ALL ZONING AND HPB
 REQUIREMENTS CONTINUE TO BE MET.
  
 4. THE PROPOSED PLAT SHALL NOT CREATE ANY NEW
 NONCONFORMITIES. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT, IT APPEARS THAT
 THE PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN LOTS 1 AND 2 WOULD RESULT IN
 THE NONCOMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIRED POOL SETBACK
 ASSOCIATED WITH THE EXISTING POOL ON LOT 1. THE SITE
 PLAN, HOWEVER, SHOWS THE EXISTING POOL MEETING THIS
 SETBACK REQUIREMENT.
  
 5. NOTE THAT FOR LOT 3, IF TWO (2) CURB-CUTS ARE
 PROPOSED, EACH OF THEM SHALL NOT EXCEED TEN (10) FEET
 IN WIDTH. ADDITIONALLY, A MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT, OR
 1,000 SQUARE FEET (WHICHEVER IS LESS) OF THE FRONT YARD
 SHALL CONSIST OF LANDSCAPING.
  
 6. IT IS THE CITY?S POLICY THAT ABANDONMENT OF ALLEYS
 REQUIRE THE APPRAISAL OF THE LAND, THE VALUE OF WHICH
 IS TO BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY IN EXCHANGE FOR THE ALLEY
 NO LONGER BEING AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE PUBLIC. PLEASE
 COORDINATE WITH VINCE NOEL, ENGINEERING AND LAND
 DEVELOPMENT MANAGER.
  
 7. THE LETTER FROM FPL INDICATES THAT EASEMENTS WILL BE
 REQUIRED TO COVER EXISTING FACILITIES. PLEASE INDICATE
 THE LOCATION OF THE FACILITIES AND WHAT EASEMENTS WILL
 BE DEDICATED. DEPENDING UPON THE LOCATION OF THE FUTURE
 EASEMENTS, SOME OF THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS MAY NEED
 TO BE RELOCATED.
  
 8. A LETTER OF NO OBJECTION STILL NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED
 FROM THE CITY?S ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 REGARDING THE ABANDONMENT OF THE ALLEY.
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) PDFS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 F) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT
 DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE
 COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved