| 2020-08-27 12:39:19 | STAFF?S POSITION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ARE LAID OUT IN |
| | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | 1. PROGRAM SHOULD BE ALL INCLUSIVE FOR DPD AND NOT |
| | REFERENCE OTHER SIGNS PERMITTED WITHIN DMP. PLEASE |
| | REMOVE REFERENCE TO OTHER SECTIONS WITHIN DMP. INCLUDE |
| | ALL PROPOSED SIGNAGE WITHIN MASTER SIGN PLAN |
| | 2. LAST SENTENCE UNDER PURPOSE AND INTENT REGARDING |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH SIGN STANDARDS WITHIN SIGN PROGRAM. |
| | THIS IS OKAY FOR LOCATION, TYPE AND NUMBER OF SIGNS, |
| | BUT BY INCLUDING THIS, THERE IS DETAILS LEFT OUT |
| | INCLUDING HOW TO COMPUTE SIGN SIZE, PERMITTED |
| | CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIALS, AND PROHIBITED SIGN TYPES. |
| | RECOMMEND INCLUDING LANGUAGE THAT THE SIGN SIZE, |
| | CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIALS, UNREGULATED SIGNS, AND |
| | PROHIBITED SIGNS ARE REGULATED WITHIN THE CITY ZLDRS OR |
| | INCLUDING SPECIFIC LANGUAGE WITHIN THE MASTER SIGN |
| | PROGRAM FOR THESE ITEMS. RECOMMEND NOT REFERENCING |
| | SPECIFIC ZLDR SECTIONS AS THE SIGN CODE IS UNDERGOING |
| | CHANGES AND THE SECTION NUMBERS WILL CHANGE. |
| | 3. STAFF?S POSITION IS THAT THE PROPOSED SIGN BETWEEN |
| | THE 5TH AND 6TH FLOOR SHOULD BE CONSIDERED A SIGN BAND, |
| | NOT A BUILDING IDENTITY SIGN AND THAT THE SIGN BETWEEN |
| | THE 17TH AND 18TH FLOORS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED A |
| | BUILDING IDENTITY SIGN, NOT A BUILDING TENANT |
| | IDENTIFICATION SIGN. BUILDING IDENTITY SIGNS WITHIN THE |
| | DMP AND WITHIN OTHER PDS INCLUDING PHILIPS POINT AND |
| | ESPERANTE ARE RESTRICTED TO THE SAME TENANT FOR THE |
| | PURPOSE OF GIVING THE BUILDING A RECOGNIZED IDENTITY. |
| | STAFF IS COMFORTABLE WITH PERMITTING A SIGN BAND ABOVE |
| | THE 2ND FLOOR, BUT RESTRICTING TO THE SAME SIZE |
| | DIMENSIONS (36? BY 60% OF WIDTH) FOR THIS SIGN. |
| | 4. PLEASE NOTE, LOGOS AND BACK PANELS THAT ARE NEEDED |
| | TO SUPPORT CHANNEL LETTERS COUNT TOWARDS PERMITTED SIGN |
| | BAND SIZE AND SF FOR BUILDING IDENTITY SIGNS, AS |
| | REGULATED BY SECTION 94-405 |
| | 5. FOR THE MONUMENT SIGN, STAFF RECOMMENDS THE |
| | FOLLOWING: |
| | A. REMOVE REFERENCE TO ?PROVISIONS OF THIS CHAPTER? |
| | UNDER BULLET POINT 2 (DOES NOT FIT HERE- NO REFERENCE) |
| | B. REPLACE ?CITY?S PLANNING MANAGER?? WITH ?CITY?S |
| | PLANNING ADMINISTRATOR?? TO REFERENCE CURRENT POSITION |
| | TITLE |
| | C. INCLUDE MAXIMUM TOTAL WIDTH OF SIGN (6?6?) AS |
| | APPROVED BY SIGN PERMIT 12060541 AS ADDITIONAL BULLET |
| | POINT UNDER DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS |
| | D. CHANGE LANGUAGE FOR LETTER HEIGHT TO ONE PANEL AT |
| | 20? AND THE REST AT 10? TO MATCH EXISTING MONUMENT SIGN |
| | CONDITIONS |
| | 6. RECOMMEND SEPARATING ?INSTRUCTIONAL SIGNS? INTO TWO |
| | SEPARATE CATEGORIES TO MATCH SIGN CODE REGULATIONS FOR |
| | ?PARKING AREA INSTRUCTIONAL AND RELATED SIGNS? AND |
| | ?PARKING AREA IDENTIFICATION SIGNS?. THESE TWO |
| | CATEGORIES COVER THE SIGNS THAT EXIST ON SITE BUT WILL |
| | BE BETTER DISTINCTIONS (?PARKING GARAGE ENTRANCE? SIGN |
| | IS DIFFERENT THAT THE ?RESERVED? SIGNS) |
| | 7. NEED TO INCLUDE THAT NAME OF BUILDING IS PERMITTED |
| | ON RESERVED PARKING SIGNAGE ? NOT COVERED UNDER TYPICAL |
| | SIGNS IN SIGN CODE. SIGN CODE ONLY INCLUDES RESERVED |
| | PARKING FOR SPECIFIC TENANTS WITHIN BUILDING |
| | 8. FOR WINDOW SIGN, PLEASE INCLUDE LANGUAGE THAT NO |
| | MORE THAN 50% OF SINGLE WINDOW PANE CAN BE COVERED FOR |
| | PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY WINDOW SIGNS. |
| | 9. PLEASE INCLUDE LANGUAGE THAT WINDOW SIGNS ARE ONLY |
| | PERMITTED FOR GROUND FLOOR TENANTS |
| | 10. STAFF?S POSITION IS THAT TEMPORARY WINDOW SIGNAGE |
| | SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED OVER THE 25% TOTAL WINDOW SIGNS |
| | PERMITTED. THE GENERAL SIGN CODE WHICH PERMITS |
| | TEMPORARY SIGNAGE DOES NOT APPLY TO DMP |
| | 11. PLEASE SUBMIT RENDERING SHOWING BOTH SIGNS ON SOUTH |
| | FA?ADE |
| | |
| | |
| | LIZ LEVESQUE, URBAN DESIGN PLANNER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561 822 1426 |
