Home Records and Reports Contractor Records Owner Records Permit Records Permit Reports Business Reports Property Records Business Tax My Account Code Enforcement Contact Us Log In/Out Print Plan Review Stops For Project Z20080008 Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) Rev No 1 Status P Date 09-09-2020 Cont ID   Sent By elevesqu Date 09-09-2020 Time 20:23 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rbrown Date 09-09-2020 Time 20:22 Sent To   Notes 2020-09-09 20:30:55 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,   COMMENTS:       1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE   SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH   FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE   ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.       2. NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THE VEHICULAR   PARKING TABLE ON SITE AND ZONING DATA SHEET A 0.01 DOES   NOT STATE HOW MANY ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES AND VAN   ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE BEING PROVIDED RELATIVE   TO THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PROPOSED. WHEN   SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT THE PLANS SHALL CLEARLY SHOW THAT   THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES   PROVIDED IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FAIR HOUSING ACT AND   SECTION 208.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE.       3. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PER SECTION 208.2.4   OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX   REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING   STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND DESIGNED IN   ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY   CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT   SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)       4. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,   THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR   THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,   AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE   FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.       5. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND   OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,   COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF   OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF   CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE   VERIFIED.       6. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES   NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO   MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL   BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE   EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED   TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR   OTHER APPROVED METHODS.       7. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS   AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE   WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED   FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,   GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND   OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,   SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.       8. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND   CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF   CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL   NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.       9. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER   AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,   INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE   CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF   NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION   THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.       10. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT   WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL   HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION   OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,   CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT   (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]       11. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT   TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE   ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP   ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC   PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:   [email protected]       ROBERT BROWN   BUILDING OFFICIAL   TEL: 561 805 6652   EMAIL: [email protected]     Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 4 Status P Date 04-02-2021 Cont ID   Sent By rrossano Date 04-02-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By rrossano Date 04-02-2021 Time   Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 3 Status F Date 03-08-2021 Cont ID   Sent By rrossano Date 03-08-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By rrossano Date 03-08-2021 Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-03-08 14:39:53 COMMENTS PER MARK HURLEY, CUSTOMER SERVICE FIELD SUPV.,   WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-822-2262, [email protected] :       -WATER PLAN SHOWS A LARGE OVAL GROUND DEPRESSION NEAR   THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING NEAR THE   WATER METERS AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES. PLEASE VERIFY IF   AREA WILL REMAIN LIKE THAT, OR IF GROUND ELEVATION WILL   INCREASE CLOSER TO THAT OF SURROUNDING AREA. (IF NOT,   CHANGES TO BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES AND DOMESTIC METER   SERVICE, OR GROUND GRADE MAY BE NEEDED.)   -THERE ARE DUPLICATE WATER SERVICE STANDARD DETAILS FOR   THE ABOVE-GROUND METER SERVICE AND SMALL BACKFLOW   ASSEMBLY. PLEASE REMOVE APR 2018 AND NOV 2018   RESPECTIVELY.   -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, MAKE SURE IRRIGATION   METER BOX IS DISTANCED AT LEAST THREE FEET FROM   ADJACENT LARGE POLE. SHOW/CALLOUT DISTANCE OR ADD NOTE   ON LABEL FOR IRRIGATION METER. (IF IRRIGATION BOX IS   ADJUSTED SOUTH, THEN FIRELINE MAY NEED ADJUSTMENT SOUTH   AS WELL.)   -PLEASE VERIFY THERE IS NO GATE OR FENCE BETWEEN   SIDEWALK AND PROPOSED METERS/BACKFLOWS.       FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR   CONCERNS, THANKS.   RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES   DEPARTMENT, 561-494-1098, [email protected]     Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-28-2020 Cont ID   Sent By rrossano Date 10-28-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By rrossano Date 10-28-2020 Time   Sent To   Notes 2020-10-28 15:17:35 COMMENTS PER RICK ROSSANO:   1. ADD ADDRESS TO COVER SHEET.   2. PROVIDE SWPPP FOR ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL SPECIFYING   STORM INLET PROTECTION ONSITE AND ALONG ENTIRE FRONTAGE   OF PROJECT.       SHEET C-08:   1. ADD NOTE TO REMOVE 8 IN. SANITARY TO BE ABANDONED.   2. ADD NAVD/NGVD CONVERSION NOTE.       SHEET C-10:   1. UPDATE SANITARY SEWER STANDARD DETAILS TO MOST   CURRENT VERSIONS; EMAIL [email protected] FOR PDF   VERSIONS OR [email protected] FOR CAD VERSIONS.   2. FOR MANHOLES IN RIGHT OF WAY, PROVIDE 5 FT. MIN.   INTERNAL DIAMETER.       COMMENTS PER MARK HURLEY:       -NEED UPDATE DEMO PLAN C-03 LABELS TO REFLECT THAT   EXISTING WATER SERVICES AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES FOR   PHASE ONE ARE NOT BEING RELOCATED OR CHANGED UNTIL   DOWNSTREAM OF THE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES, AS INDICATED IN   PRIOR COMMENT RESPONSES.       -ON UTILITY PLAN C-08, RELOCATE GATE VALVES FOR NEW   WATER SERVICES OUT OF THE SIDEWALK.       -PROPOSED DOMESTIC 6 INCH METER IS STILL TOO FAR FROM   THE PROPERTY LINE. POSSIBLE SOLUTION MAY BE TO RELOCATE   FIRE AND IRRIGATION WATER SERVICES SOUTH OF THE GUY   ANCHOR EASEMENT, AND RELOCATE THE DOMESTIC METER EAST   (STILL NORTH OF THE GUY ANCHOR EASEMENT).       -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD LABELS TO THE   CITY WATER SERVICE PIPING SHOWING PIPE SIZE AND   MATERIAL TYPE USED. ALSO ADD LABELS ON THE REROUTED   PRIVATE PIPING FOR THE EXISTING WATER SERVICES THAT   SHOW PIPE MATERIAL FOR THE FIRE AND IRRIGATION LINES.       -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, UPDATE LABELS FOR   IRRIGATION METER AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TO REFERENCE   WS-1 AND WS-6 RESPECTIVELY.       FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR   CONCERNS, THANKS.   RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES   DEPARTMENT, 561-494-1098, [email protected]     Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-03-2020 Cont ID   Sent By rrossano Date 09-03-2020 Time   Rev Time   Received By rrossano Date 09-03-2020 Time   Sent To   Notes 2020-09-03 17:24:46 FOLLOWING COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT   COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT,   561-494-1098, [email protected] :       1. THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF   REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY   AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND   WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE   DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK   BELOW: HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=   ~\WPB_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION   -FULL-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC0   2A97B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF   THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE   FOUND HERE: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBL   IC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS   2. CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH,   FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08, ADOPTED   SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)   CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. SEC. 90-7.   POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER SERVICE   FACILITIES OF THE CITY.   THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE   CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY   BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,   BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.   3. AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH   CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,   STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR   MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:   HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI   CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL   4. PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY   OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC   RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF   YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE   MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL   IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT   [email protected] OR 561-494-1040 FOR FURTHER   ASSISTANCE.   5. PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS   OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES,   INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND   SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES,   METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE   SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING   GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS,   ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL   INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER   LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE   PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN   VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.   PLEASE SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT   MATERIAL. ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL   EXISTING AND PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT,   INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &   TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE   RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL   UTILITY CROSSINGS.   6. CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY   ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY   ROW.   7. PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE   DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB   DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION).   8. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND   PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM   AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE   PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER.   9. SHOW VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION INFORMATION   (NAVD 88 AND NGVD 29).   10. PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND   STORMWATER FACILITIES ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE.   11. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND   IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED   AREAS.   12. PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR   PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.   13. PLEASE LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE   APPLICABLE.   14. PLEASE PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED   LOCATION OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION; CALL   OUT HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OF PROPOSED WATER FROM   EXISTING 8 IN. SANITARY LINE.   15. PROPOSED DOMESTIC WATER TAP SHOWN CONNECTING TO   EXISTING 8 IN. SANITARY LINE; PLEASE CORRECT.   16. COORDINATE WITH MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE   SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING   PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT   HIM AT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]   17. PROVIDE DEDICATED UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS   FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS.               THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM HONG XU, PROJECT   ENGINEER, CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-494-1047,   [email protected] :       PLEASE CLARIFY IF 6 INCH POTABLE WATER SERVICE, 8 INCH   DIP FIRE SERVICE AND 3 INCH IRRIGATION SERVICE ARE   EXISTING OR PROPOSED. HOW DO THEY CONNECT TO EXISTING   ONES?       ARE THERE PROPOSED SEWER LATERALS CONNECTING TO   EXISTING 8 INCH VCP SANITARY SEWER MAIN FROM THE   PROPOSED BUILDING?       ARE THERE ANY DRY UTILITIES THE AREA?       PLEASE PROVIDE THE LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATION.       THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD   CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES:       -IS THE EXISTING PHASE ONE PROPERTY ADDRESS 350 S.   AUSTRALIAN OR 300 S. AUSTRALIAN? EXISTING WATER   SERVICES SHOW UP AS 300 S. AUSTRALIAN AVE IN UTILITY   BILLING SYSTEM. PLEASE ALSO VERIFY ADDRESS OF PHASE TWO   CONSTRUCTION.       -IT APPEARS THERE ARE AT LEAST TWO EXISTING FIRE   HYDRANTS ON WEST SIDE OF OPEN SPACE DOWNSTREAM OF   EXISTING DCDA FIRELINE. WILL THOSE REMAIN IN SAME SPOT   OR BE RELOCATED NEARBY?       -EXISTING FIRE DCDA NEEDS TO REMAIN ADJACENT CLEARWATER   DR. NEAR THE EASTERN PROPERTY LINE. ON FORMAL   ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL PLEASE LABEL POINT OF SERVICE   GATE VALVE.       -EXISTING 6? DOMESTIC METER NEEDS TO BE INSTALLED   ABOVE-GROUND WHEN RELOCATED WITHOUT A LARGE VAULT PER   CONSTRUCTION STANDARD DETAILS. DO NOT REUSE WATER   SERVICE COMPONENTS SUCH AS FITTINGS, BOXES, LIDS,   VALVES, AND PIPING ? REPLACE THEM. PLAN THE WORK TO   MINIMIZE WATER SERVICE OUTAGES FOR CUSTOMERS.       -KEEP WATER METER BOX, BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES, AND VALVE   BOXES OUT OF SIDEWALKS AND PEDESTRIAN FOOT TRAFFIC.       -RELOCATED BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES WILL BE SUBJECT TO   BACKFLOW INSTALLATION INSPECTIONS. ANY BACKFLOW   ASSEMBLIES THAT ARE NOT LEAD-FREE COMPLIANT OR USC   APPROVED WILL NEED TO BE REPLACED WITH COMPLIANT   ASSEMBLIES.       -EXISTING IRRIGATION METER IS 2?. IF NOT SUFFICIENT,   MAY NEED TO UPSIZE OR ADD ADDITIONAL WATER SERVICE.       -WATER SERVICES AND METERS (EXISTING OR PROPOSED) ON   PRIVATE PROPERTY WILL REQUIRE UTILITY EASEMENT IF NOT   EXISTING ALREADY. BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES CANNOT BE IN   UTILITY EASEMENTS.       -NEED MORE INFORMATION ON LOCATION OF PROPOSED NEW   WATER SERVICES AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES. IS THAT   LOCATION A GRASSY AREA WHERE THERE IS NO INTENTION OF   PEDESTRIAN OR VEHICLE TRAFFIC? THEY CANNOT BE LOCATED   IN ROADWAYS OR SIDEWALKS.       -EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT NEAR SE CORNER OF PROPERTY   APPEARS TO BE LEFT OFF OF UTILITY PLAN. PLEASE ADD AND   LABEL.       -PROPOSED DOMESTIC AND IRRIGATION WATER SERVICES WITH   METERS 3? AND LARGER SHOULD BE ABOVE-GROUND   INSTALLATION USING SD WS-3.       -PLEASE RELOCATE PROPOSED WATER SERVICE PIPING SO THAT   IT DOES NOT RUN UNDERNEATH AND CLOSE TO FPL/AT&T   UTILITIES AND GUY WIRES. BUILDING STRUCTURE OR LOCATION   MAY NEED REDESIGN/ALTERATION TO FACILITATE THIS. ALSO   RELOCATE PROPOSED METERS CLOSER TO EASTERN PROPERTY   LINE SO THEY ARE WITHIN REACH OF CRANETRUCK OR BACKHOE,   AND PIPE DISTANCE TO WATER MAIN IS MINIMIZED.       -VERIFY PROPOSED 8? DCDA LOCATION IS ACCEPTABLE WITH   CITY WPB FIRE MARSHAL.       -SOME PARTS OF THE PROPERTY LIMITS APPEAR TO BE LEFT   OFF OF THE UTILITY PLANS. PLEASE ADD THOSE AREAS TO THE   PLANS USING MATCH-LINES AND EXTRA SHEETS IF NECESSARY.       -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL ADD ENLARGED/ZOOMED   AREA OF THE METERED WATER SERVICES AND BACKFLOW   ASSEMBLIES.       -WPB UTILITIES RECOMMENDS PARALLEL/DUAL BACKFLOW   ASSEMBLIES ON LARGE DOMESTIC WATER SERVICES TO MINIMIZE   WATER OUTAGES DURING BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY MAINTENANCE.             Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT Rev No 4 Status P Date 03-31-2021 Cont ID   Sent By pleduc Date 03-31-2021 Time 14:39 Rev Time 0.00 Received By pleduc Date 03-31-2021 Time 14:38 Sent To   Notes 2021-03-31 14:39:24 FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS AND APPROVES.       FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES NOT   CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.       FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT THE   APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE   REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.       PETER LEDUC   FIRE MARSHAL   561-804-4709   [email protected]     Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT Rev No 3 Status P Date 03-05-2021 Cont ID   Sent By pleduc Date 03-05-2021 Time 13:33 Rev Time 0.00 Received By pleduc Date 03-05-2021 Time 13:32 Sent To   Notes 2021-03-05 13:33:07 FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS AND APPROVES.       FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES NOT   CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.       FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT THE   APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE   REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.       PETER LEDUC   FIRE MARSHAL   561-804-4709   [email protected]     Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT Rev No 2 Status F Date 11-04-2020 Cont ID   Sent By pleduc Date 11-04-2020 Time 09:47 Rev Time 0.00 Received By pleduc Date 11-04-2020 Time 09:44 Sent To   Notes 2020-11-04 09:52:44 THOUGH FIRE HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED AND HAS   PASSED THE REVIEW, THE RESPONSES TO THE FIRE COMMENTS   ARE VAGUE AND GENERAL.       FIRE AND ZONING STAFF IS REQUESTING GREATER DETAIL FOR   THE FDC, DDCV FIRE LINE, FIRE HYDRANTS, AND LOCATION OF   COMMAND ROOM. ADDITIONALLY, THE OCCUPANCY FOR THE POOL   DECK, AND SEPARATION DISTANCE OF STAIRWELLS COULD HAVE   MAJOR IMPACTS TO THE DESIGN OF THE STRUCTURE DURING   BUILDING PERMIT.       PETER LEDUC   FIRE MARSHAL   561-804-4709   [email protected]         Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT Rev No 1 Status P Date 09-09-2020 Cont ID   Sent By pleduc Date 09-09-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By pleduc Date 09-09-2020 Time 08:55 Sent To   Notes 2020-09-09 09:34:00 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,   FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM   BEACH FIRE RESCUE.       THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE   DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS   ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.       THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE   PROPOSED PROJECT.       1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY   WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE   PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A   PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED   TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN   STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY   MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER   PROTECTION.       2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY   IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING   ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.       3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM   ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.   ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND   AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT   WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.       4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE   REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE   ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.       5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH   THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,   INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.       6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,   PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,   INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE   OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)       7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA   14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS   STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE   BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE   BEING CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED   TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE   PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.       A FDC LOCATION COULD NOT BE EASILY IDENTIFIED ON THE   CIVIL SITE PLAN. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT HIGH RISES HAVE   TWO SEPARATE FDC LOCATED REMOTELY FOR EACH OTHER. ONE   FDC IS RECOMMENDED ON CLEARWATER NEAR THE SOUTH END   PARKING GARAGE ACCESS AND THE OTHER ALONG THE NORTH   ACCESS ROAD IN THE AREA OF THE FIRE COMMAND ROOM. CLOSE   COORDINATION WITH THE OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL IS   ENCOURAGED.       7A. PER NFPA 14       6.4.5.4* FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED   NOT MORE THAN 100 FT (30.5 M) FROM THE NEAREST FIRE   HYDRANT CONNECTED TO AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY.       7B. PLEASE REVIEW THE DISTANCE SEPARATION OF THE   STAIRWELLS AS THE SEPARATION DISTANCE IS NOT INDICATED.       7.3.2.2* WHERE THE MOST REMOTE PORTION OF A   NON-SPRINKLERED FLOOR OR STORY IS LOCATED IN EXCESS OF   150 FT (45.7 M) OF TRAVEL DISTANCE FROM A HOSE   CONNECTION IN OR ADJACENT TO A REQUIRED EXIT OR THE   MOST REMOTE PORTION OF A SPRINKLERED FLOOR OR STORY   IS LOCATED IN EXCESS OF 200 FT (61 M) OF TRAVEL   DISTANCE FROM A HOSE CONNECTION IN OR ADJACENT TO A   REQUIRED EXIT, ADDITIONAL HOSE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE   PROVIDED, IN APPROVED LOCATIONS, WHERE REQUIRED BY THE   LOCAL FIRE DEPARTMENT OR THE AHJ.       7C. PER NFPA 1       18.3 WATER SUPPLIES.   18.3.1* AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING   THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE   PROVIDED TO ALL PREMISES UPON WHICH FACILITIES,   BUILDINGS, OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS ARE HEREAFTER   CONSTRUCTED OR MOVED INTO THE JURISDICTION. THE   APPROVED WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH   SECTION 18.4.       PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004,   FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE   POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF   APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT,   CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR   AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER   SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA)   AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS   PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS.       FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE   PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?       7D. THE LOCATION OF THE DDCV FIRE LINE LOCATION SHALL   MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE   COORDINATED WITH THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S   ENGINEERS OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S   PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE.       8. A CLASS ?A? NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM   SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP   DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND   APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY   INSTALLATION.       9. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7   KEYWAY SYSTEM.       ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S   EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA   B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.       ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN   WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL   LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET   MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER   ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN   AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE   IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.       10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL   BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL   DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,   EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A   PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE   SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.       10A. PLEASE REVIEW THE OCCUPANCY LOAD OF THE POOL DECK   AND THE REQUIRED EXITING REQUIREMENTS AND EXIT   SEPARATION DISTANCES TO ENSURE COMPLAINCE WITH NFPA   101, CH 12, ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCIES AND CH 7, MEANS OF   EGRESS. THREE OR MORE EXITS MAY BE REQUIRED.       11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS   DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED   ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF   FIRE PREVENTION.       ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS   DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE   BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND   FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET   OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER   ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES.       12. COMMAND ROOM       THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1,   CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN   THE FOLLOWING FEATURES:       A. SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 200 FT SQUARED WITH A MINIMUM   DIMENSION OF 10 FT.   B. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.   C. A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED   ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM   D. SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL   FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF   EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING   EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS AND THE LOCATION   OF FIRE WALLS, FIRE BARRIERS, FIRE PARTITIONS, SMOKE   BARRIERS AND SMOKE PARTITIONS   E. A WORK TABLE.   F. IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN   FOR THE BUILDING.   G. THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM   CONTROL UNIT.   H. ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION OF   THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL   I. STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR DISTRIBUTION   SYSTEMS.   J. CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS SIMULTANEOUSLY   K. SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY   PANELS   L. EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS   M. FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS   N. GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND   TRANSFER FEATURES.   O. PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED   BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE   P. CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL   Q. ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME   A17.1.   R. ELEVATOR EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER SELECTOR   SWITCH(ES), WHERE EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER IS   PROVIDED       11.8.6* EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER.       11.8.6.1 AN EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE PROVIDED   IN A   LOCATION APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.       11.8.6.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL CONTAIN THE   FOLLOWING:   (1) VOICE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM PANELS AND CONTROLS   (2) FIRE DEPARTMENT TWO-WAY TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION   SERVICE   PANELS AND CONTROLS WHERE REQUIRED BY ANOTHER SECTION   OF THIS   CODE   (3) FIRE DETECTION AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATION   PANELS   (4) ELEVATOR FLOOR LOCATION AND OPERATION ANNUNCIATORS   (5) ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME   A17.1/CSA B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS AND ESCALATORS   (6) ELEVATOR EMERGENCY POWER SELECTOR SWITCH(ES) WHERE   PROVIDED   IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME A17.1/CSA B44   (7) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATERFLOW ANNUNCIATORS   (8) EMERGENCY GENERATOR STATUS INDICATORS   (9) CONTROLS FOR ANY AUTOMATIC STAIRWAY DOOR UNLOCKING   SYSTEM   (10) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS   (11) TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED   ACCESS TO THE   PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM   (12) STAIRWAY VIDEO MONITORING EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED BY   11.8.8       13. RADIO       NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY   RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.       11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM   RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT   COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL   DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.       NFPA 72, 24.5.2* TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS   ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS.       24.5.2.2 RADIO COVERAGE. RADIO COVERAGE SHALL BE   PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE BUILDING AS A PERCENTAGE OF   FLOOR AREA AS SPECIFIED IN 24.5.2.2.1 THROUGH   24.5.2.2.3.   24.5.2.2.1 CRITICAL AREAS. CRITICAL AREAS, SUCH AS THE   EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER(S), THE FIRE PUMP ROOM(S),   EXIT STAIRS, EXIT PASSAGEWAYS, ELEVATOR LOBBIES,   STANDPIPE CABINETS, SPRINKLER SECTIONAL VALVE   LOCATIONS, AND OTHER AREAS DEEMED CRITICAL BY THE   AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH   99 PERCENT FLOOR AREA RADIO COVERAGE.   24.5.2.2.2 GENERAL BUILDING AREAS. GENERAL BUILDING   AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH 90 PERCENT FLOOR AREA   RADIO COVERAGE.   24.5.2.3 SIGNAL STRENGTH.   24.5.2.3.1 INBOUND. A MINIMUM INBOUND SIGNAL STRENGTH   OF -95 DBM, OR OTHER SIGNAL STRENGTH AS REQUIRED BY THE   AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL BE PROVIDED   THROUGHOUT THE COVERAGE AREA.   24.5.2.3.2 OUTBOUND. A MINIMUM OUTBOUND SIGNAL STRENGTH   OF -95 DBM AT THE DONOR SITE, OR OTHER SIGNAL STRENGTH   AS REQUIRED BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL   BE PROVIDED FROM THE COVERAGE AREA.       THE SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL   STRENGTH OF -95 DBM FOR THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST   PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE. TESTING SHALL BE BY AN   ACCEPTABLE NATIONAL STANDARD DOCUMENTING PERCENTAGES   NOTED ABOVE AND BY ACTUAL RADIO TESTING BY FIRE   PERSONNEL. IF THE MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A   BI-DIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH   A MINIMUM 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP.       PLEASE CONTACT MARK FILLA, PALM BEACH COUNTY PUBLIC   SAFETY RADIO SYSTEMS MANAGER, AS OUR RADIOS OPERATE ON   THEIR SYSTEM FOR DETAILED RADIO FREQUENCY AND   INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.           14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS   BUILDING.       ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS,   PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.       15. THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA   101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE PROTECTION   EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING:       THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED,   INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH   NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204,   STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY   RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR   RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY   HAVING JURISDICTION.       THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE   INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE   APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED   MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE   SYSTEM.       ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL   INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.9.       16. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT   DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.       17. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING   PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH   THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.       PETER LEDUC   FIRE MARSHAL   561-804-4709   [email protected]     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 5 Status P Date 03-29-2021 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 04-12-2021 Time 11:41 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 03-29-2021 Time 11:40 Sent To   Notes 2021-04-12 11:41:54 FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER   561-822-1462   PROJECT: 350 N AUSTRALIAN Z20080008   MARCH 29, 2021   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:       1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A COMPLETE TREE SURVEY THAT   INCLUDES ALL AFFECTED AREAS INCLUDING PAVEMENT OR   PARKING MODIFICATIONS TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY.   THE ADDITIONAL AREAS FOR THE TREE SURVEY HAVE NOT BEEN   INCLUDED.       2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION LIST AND PLAN.   TREE DISPOSITION IS STILL MISSING EXISTING TREES.       3. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE   TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR   RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY   EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR   POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE CONDITION FOR ALL TREES   AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND   PALMS.   ALL TREES NEED TO BE INCLUDED, AND AN ACCURATE REASON   FOR REMOVAL PROVIDED. THE EXISTING LIVE OAKS CAN BE   EITHER PRESERVED IN PLACE OR RELOCATED TO CITY   PROPERTY.           4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED AND   PROVIDED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR CLD 25   ZONING DISTRICT. IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE AS   ALLOWED BY TABLE IV-7 AND DEFINITIONS IN SECTION   94-109. SHOW HOW THE STANDARDS FOR THE TYPES OF OPEN   SPACE ARE MET FOR VEGETATED AREAS AND TREE CANOPY   SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED ON TABLE IV-8.   THE REQUIRED PRIVATE OPEN SPACE NEEDS TO BE QUANTIFIED,   IDENTIFIED AS TO THE TYPE, AND ALL REQUIREMENTS NEED TO   BE SHOWN FOR THAT OPEN SPACE TYPE. THE ROOFTOP AREA   WITH THE POOL WOULD BE ROOFTOP GARDEN. THE PUBLIC OPEN   SPACE NEEDS TO BE IDENTIFIED AS A TYPE THAT FITS,   PROBABLY GARDEN PLAZA, AND THE REQUIREMENTS SHOWN.       FOR THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE ROOFTOP GARDEN CORRECT THE   TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR TREE TYPES BASED ON   TABLE IV-8.   PROVIDE THE DETAILS ON THE PLANT LIST AND TREE CANOPY   CREDITS FOR THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE.       5. SATISFIED. ADD RELOCATED TREES OR PALMS TO THE PLANT   LIST AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE REQUIRED TREES.   TREE SURVEY AND TREE DISPOSITION NEED TO BE COMPLETED.       6. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET   TREES AT ONE FOR EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR   STREETSCAPE LENGTH, AND SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED PER   SECTION 94-113 AND 94-116.   STREET TREE CALCULATIONS AND PLAN NEED TO BE PROVIDED.       7. SATISFIED. THERE APPEAR TO BE CONFLICTS IN SEVERAL   LOCATIONS BETWEEN EXISTING TREES AND WATER AND SEWER   LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. ADJUST LOCATIONS OF   UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING TREES   AND LANDSCAPING IN THE OPEN SPACE. THE REQUIRED STREET   TREES PROPOSED ALONG CLEARWATER ARE IN CONFLICT WITH AN   EXISTING SEWER LINE.   FROM THE ACTUAL UTILITY LOCATIONS, THERE IS A WATER   LINE THAT WOULD CONFLICT WITH THE STREET TREE LOCATIONS   THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE RELOCATED ALSO.       8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A COMPLETE PLANT LIST.   PLANT LIST NEEDS TO BE MODIFIED TO SEPARATE THE   REQUIRED OPEN SPACE PLANT LISTS.           9. SATISFIED. REMOVE HIGHRISE CULTIVAR AND INDICATE   SPECIES LIVE OAK.       10. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE 50 REQUIRED FLORIDA FRIENDLY   POINTS BASED ON THE FINAL PLANT LIST PER SECTION   94-443(G).   REVISE AFTER ALL CHANGES ARE COMPLETE WITH LANDSCAPE   PLAN. 6A. DOES NOT QUALIFY.   PROVIDE ANY JUSTIFICATION FOR 6A.OR PROVIDE OTHER   POINTS.       11. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.   PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT   MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT   TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE   LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH   FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH   FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED   ON THE PLANT LIST.   REVISE AFTER ALL CHANGES ARE COMPLETE WITH LANDSCAPE   PLAN.       ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 11/4/20:       12. SATISFIED. THE TWO LIVE OAK TREES K AND L SHOULD BE   PRESERVED, AND THE PLAZA DESIGNED AROUND THEM       13. SATISFIED. THERE ARE LIVE OAK TREES THAT ARE IN   CONFLICT WITH EXISTING ABOVE GROUND UTILITY VALVES.   THIS NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED IF THE VALVE LOCATIONS ARE   NOT BEING MODIFIED.       14. SATISFIED. OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED   TREES NEED TO BE SEPARATED FROM THE REQUIRED PUBLIC AND   PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS.       15. SATISFIED. PROVIDE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS ON THE CHART   FOR THE SOUTHERN AREAS OF THE LOT ADJACENT TO PROPERTY   LINES.       16. SATISFIED. ANY NEW PARKING CREATED MUST MEET THE   REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(C)(3) A. INCLUDING   TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS. THE CONFLICT WITH THE   RELOCATED HYDRANT AND THE PROPOSED OAK TREE ADJACENT TO   THE PROPOSED PARKING.       ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 3/23/21:       17. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE   DISPOSITION PLAN:   ? SATISFIED. THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN NEEDS TO FOLLOW   WEST PALM BEACH CODE SECTION 94-448, REMOVE REFERENCES   TO OTHER COUNTY(?) CODES.   ? SATISFIED. REMOVE COCOPLUM FROM LIST, AS IT IS NOT   CLASSIFIED AS A TREE.   ? SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN TO THE CHART FOR MITIGATION   SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE   ? SATISFIED. WASHINGTONIA PALMS ARE CATEGORY 4 AND ARE   50 SQ FT MITIGATION DUE.   ? SATISFIED. ROYAL PALMS ARE CATEGORY 3 AND ARE 100 SQ   FT MITIGATION DUE.   ? SATISFIED. OLEANDER IS CATEGORY 3 AND IS 100 SQ FT   MITIGATION DUE.   ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE   DUE.   ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE   FOOTAGE PROVIDED BASED ON THE PLANT LIST.       18. SATISFIED. THERE IS STILL A CONFLICT WITH THE LIVE   OAK TREE, THE SEWER LINE AND THE FDC ON THE SOUTH SIDE   OF PROPOSED PARKING. A PARKING SPACE MAY HAVE TO BE   CONVERTED TO LANDSCAPE AREA TO RESOLVE THE CONFLICT.   19. SATISFIED. STREET TREES NEED TO BE SHOWN LOCATED   BETWEEN THE BACK OF CURB AND SIDEWALK IN THE PLANTING   STRIP.   20. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND   MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT AND ADD A NOTE THAT ALL   EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED.   CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 4 Status F Date 03-23-2021 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 03-23-2021 Time 15:30 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 03-23-2021 Time 15:30 Sent To   Notes 2021-03-23 15:31:14 FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER   561-822-1462   PROJECT: 350 N AUSTRALIAN Z20080008   MARCH 23, 2021   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:       1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A COMPLETE TREE SURVEY THAT   INCLUDES ALL AFFECTED AREAS INCLUDING PAVEMENT OR   PARKING MODIFICATIONS TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY.   THE ADDITIONAL AREAS FOR THE TREE SURVEY HAVE NOT BEEN   INCLUDED.       2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION LIST AND PLAN.   TREE DISPOSITION IS STILL MISSING EXISTING TREES.       3. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE   TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR   RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY   EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR   POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE CONDITION FOR ALL TREES   AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND   PALMS.   ALL TREES NEED TO BE INCLUDED, AND AN ACCURATE REASON   FOR REMOVAL PROVIDED. THE EXISTING LIVE OAKS CAN BE   EITHER PRESERVED IN PLACE OR RELOCATED TO CITY   PROPERTY.           4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE   REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE   AREAS FOR CLD 25 ZONING DISTRICT. IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF   OPEN SPACE AS ALLOWED BY TABLE IV-7 AND DEFINITIONS IN   SECTION 94-109. SHOW HOW THE STANDARDS FOR THE TYPES OF   OPEN SPACE ARE MET FOR VEGETATED AREAS AND TREE CANOPY   SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED ON TABLE IV-8.   THE REQUIRED PRIVATE OPEN SPACE NEEDS TO BE QUANTIFIED,   IDENTIFIED AS TO THE TYPE, AND ALL REQUIREMENTS NEED TO   BE SHOWN FOR THAT OPEN SPACE TYPE. THE ROOFTOP AREA   WITH THE POOL WOULD BE ROOFTOP GARDEN. THE PUBLIC OPEN   SPACE NEEDS TO BE IDENTIFIED AS A TYPE THAT FITS,   PROBABLY GARDEN PLAZA, AND THE REQUIREMENTS SHOWN.       FOR THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE ROOFTOP GARDEN CORRECT THE   TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR TREE TYPES BASED ON   TABLE IV-8.   PROVIDE THE DETAILS ON THE PLANT LIST AND TREE CANOPY   CREDITS FOR THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE.       5. SATISFIED. ADD RELOCATED TREES OR PALMS TO THE PLANT   LIST AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE REQUIRED TREES.   TREE SURVEY AND TREE DISPOSITION NEED TO BE COMPLETED.       6. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET   TREES AT ONE FOR EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR   STREETSCAPE LENGTH, AND SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED PER   SECTION 94-113 AND 94-116.   STREET TREE CALCULATIONS AND PLAN NEED TO BE PROVIDED.       7. SATISFIED. THERE APPEAR TO BE CONFLICTS IN SEVERAL   LOCATIONS BETWEEN EXISTING TREES AND WATER AND SEWER   LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. ADJUST LOCATIONS OF   UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING TREES   AND LANDSCAPING IN THE OPEN SPACE. THE REQUIRED STREET   TREES PROPOSED ALONG CLEARWATER ARE IN CONFLICT WITH AN   EXISTING SEWER LINE.   FROM THE ACTUAL UTILITY LOCATIONS, THERE IS A WATER   LINE THAT WOULD CONFLICT WITH THE STREET TREE LOCATIONS   THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE RELOCATED ALSO.       8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A COMPLETE PLANT LIST.   PLANT LIST NEEDS TO BE MODIFIED TO SEPARATE THE   REQUIRED OPEN SPACE PLANT LISTS.           9. SATISFIED. REMOVE HIGHRISE CULTIVAR AND INDICATE   SPECIES LIVE OAK.       10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE 50 REQUIRED   FLORIDA FRIENDLY POINTS BASED ON THE FINAL PLANT LIST   PER SECTION 94-443(G).   REVISE AFTER ALL CHANGES ARE COMPLETE WITH LANDSCAPE   PLAN. 6A. DOES NOT QUALIFY.   PROVIDE ANY JUSTIFICATION FOR 6A.OR PROVIDE OTHER   POINTS.       11. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.   PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT   MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT   TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE   LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH   FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH   FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED   ON THE PLANT LIST.   REVISE AFTER ALL CHANGES ARE COMPLETE WITH LANDSCAPE   PLAN.       ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 11/4/20:       12. SATISFIED. THE TWO LIVE OAK TREES K AND L SHOULD BE   PRESERVED, AND THE PLAZA DESIGNED AROUND THEM       13. SATISFIED. THERE ARE LIVE OAK TREES THAT ARE IN   CONFLICT WITH EXISTING ABOVE GROUND UTILITY VALVES.   THIS NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED IF THE VALVE LOCATIONS ARE   NOT BEING MODIFIED.       14. SATISFIED. OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED   TREES NEED TO BE SEPARATED FROM THE REQUIRED PUBLIC AND   PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS.       15. SATISFIED. PROVIDE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS ON THE CHART   FOR THE SOUTHERN AREAS OF THE LOT ADJACENT TO PROPERTY   LINES.       16. SATISFIED. ANY NEW PARKING CREATED MUST MEET THE   REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(C)(3) A. INCLUDING   TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS. THE CONFLICT WITH THE   RELOCATED HYDRANT AND THE PROPOSED OAK TREE ADJACENT TO   THE PROPOSED PARKING.       ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 4/23/21:       17. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE   DISPOSITION PLAN:   ? THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN NEEDS TO FOLLOW WEST PALM   BEACH CODE SECTION 94-448, REMOVE REFERENCES TO OTHER   COUNTY(?) CODES.   ? REMOVE COCOPLUM FROM LIST, AS IT IS NOT CLASSIFIED AS   A TREE.   ? ADD A COLUMN TO THE CHART FOR MITIGATION SQUARE   FOOTAGE DUE   ? WASHINGTONIA PALMS ARE CATEGORY 4 AND ARE 50 SQ FT   MITIGATION DUE.   ? ROYAL PALMS ARE CATEGORY 3 AND ARE 100 SQ FT   MITIGATION DUE.   ? OLEANDER IS CATEGORY 2 AND IS 100 SQ FT MITIGATION   DUE.   ? PROVIDE TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE.   ? PROVIDE A TOTAL OF MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED   BASED ON THE PLANT LIST.       18. THERE IS STILL A CONFLICT WITH THE LIVE OAK TREE,   THE SEWER LINE AND THE FDC ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF   PROPOSED PARKING. A PARKING SPACE MAY HAVE TO BE   CONVERTED TO LANDSCAPE AREA TO RESOLVE THE CONFLICT.   19. STREET TREES NEED TO BE SHOWN LOCATED BETWEEN THE   BACK OF CURB AND SIDEWALK IN THE PLANTING STRIP.   20. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED   VALVES AND EQUIPMENT AND ADD A NOTE THAT ALL EQUIPMENT   WILL BE SCREENED.   CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 3 Status F Date 03-23-2021 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 03-23-2021 Time 14:02 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 03-23-2021 Time 14:02 Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 2 Status F Date 11-04-2020 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 11-04-2020 Time 16:40 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 11-04-2020 Time 16:40 Sent To   Notes 2020-11-04 16:41:13 FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER   561-822-1462   PROJECT: 350 N AUSTRALIAN Z20080008   NOVEMBER 4, 2020   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:       1. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A COMPLETE TREE SURVEY THAT   INCLUDES ALL AFFECTED AREAS INCLUDING PAVEMENT OR   PARKING MODIFICATIONS TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY.   THE ADDITIONAL AREAS FOR THE TREE SURVEY HAVE NOT BEEN   INCLUDED.       2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION LIST   AND PLAN.   TREE DISPOSITION IS STILL MISSING EXISTING TREES.       3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES   NATIVE TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE   OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY   EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR   POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE CONDITION FOR ALL TREES   AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND   PALMS.   ALL TREES NEED TO BE INCLUDED, AND AN ACCURATE REASON   FOR REMOVAL PROVIDED. THE EXISTING LIVE OAKS CAN BE   EITHER PRESERVED IN PLACE OR RELOCATED TO CITY   PROPERTY.           4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE   REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE   AREAS FOR CLD 25 ZONING DISTRICT. IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF   OPEN SPACE AS ALLOWED BY TABLE IV-7 AND DEFINITIONS IN   SECTION 94-109. SHOW HOW THE STANDARDS FOR THE TYPES OF   OPEN SPACE ARE MET FOR VEGETATED AREAS AND TREE CANOPY   SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED ON TABLE IV-8.   THE REQUIRED PRIVATE OPEN SPACE NEEDS TO BE QUANTIFIED,   IDENTIFIED AS TO THE TYPE, AND ALL REQUIREMENTS NEED TO   BE SHOWN FOR THAT OPEN SPACE TYPE. THE ROOFTOP AREA   WITH THE POOL WOULD BE ROOFTOP GARDEN. THE PUBLIC OPEN   SPACE NEEDS TO BE IDENTIFIED AS A TYPE THAT FITS,   PROBABLY GARDEN PLAZA, AND THE REQUIREMENTS SHOWN.           5. NOT SATISFIED. ADD RELOCATED TREES OR PALMS TO THE   PLANT LIST AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE REQUIRED TREES.   TREE SURVEY AND TREE DISPOSITION NEED TO BE COMPLETED.       6. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED   STREET TREES AT ONE FOR EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION   THEREOF FOR STREETSCAPE LENGTH, AND SHOW THE NUMBER   PROVIDED PER SECTION 94-113 AND 94-116.   STREET TREE CALCULATIONS AND PLAN NEED TO BE PROVIDED.       7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THERE APPEAR TO BE CONFLICTS IN   SEVERAL LOCATIONS BETWEEN EXISTING TREES AND WATER AND   SEWER LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. ADJUST LOCATIONS OF   UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING TREES   AND LANDSCAPING IN THE OPEN SPACE. THE REQUIRED STREET   TREES PROPOSED ALONG CLEARWATER ARE IN CONFLICT WITH AN   EXISTING SEWER LINE.   FROM THE ACTUAL UTILITY LOCATIONS, THERE IS A WATER   LINE THAT WOULD CONFLICT WITH THE STREET TREE LOCATIONS   THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE RELOCATED ALSO.       8. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A COMPLETE PLANT LIST.   PLANT LIST NEEDS TO BE MODIFIED TO SEPARATE THE   REQUIRED OPEN SPACE PLANT LISTS.           9. SATISFIED. REMOVE HIGHRISE CULTIVAR AND INDICATE   SPECIES LIVE OAK.       10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE 50 REQUIRED   FLORIDA FRIENDLY POINTS BASED ON THE FINAL PLANT LIST   PER SECTION 94-443(G).   REVISE AFTER ALL CHANGES ARE COMPLETE WITH LANDSCAPE   PLAN. 6A. DOES NOT QUALIFY.           11. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION   94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF   PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT   TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE   LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH   FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH   FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED   ON THE PLANT LIST.   REVISE AFTER ALL CHANGES ARE COMPLETE WITH LANDSCAPE   PLAN.       ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 11/4/20:       12. THE TWO LIVE OAK TREES K AND L SHOULD BE PRESERVED,   AND THE PLAZA DESIGNED AROUND THEM       13. THERE ARE LIVE OAK TREES THAT ARE IN CONFLICT WITH   EXISTING ABOVE GROUND UTILITY VALVES. THIS NEEDS TO BE   ADDRESSED IF THE VALVE LOCATIONS ARE NOT BEING   MODIFIED.       14. OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED TREES NEED TO   BE SEPARATED FROM THE REQUIRED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN   SPACE AREAS.       15. PROVIDE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS ON THE CHART FOR THE   SOUTHERN AREAS OF THE LOT ADJACENT TO PROPERTY LINES.       16. ANY NEW PARKING CREATED MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS   OF SECTION 94-443(C)(3) A. INCLUDING TERMINAL LANDSCAPE   ISLANDS. THE CONFLICT WITH THE RELOCATED HYDRANT AND   THE PROPOSED OAK TREE ADJACENT TO THE PROPOSED PARKING.   CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-08-2020 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 09-08-2020 Time 13:19 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 09-08-2020 Time 13:19 Sent To   Notes 2020-09-08 13:19:29 FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER   561-822-1462   PROJECT: 350 N AUSTRALIAN Z20080008   SEPTEMBER 8, 2020   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:       1. PROVIDE A COMPLETE TREE SURVEY THAT INCLUDES ALL   AFFECTED AREAS INCLUDING PAVEMENT OR PARKING   MODIFICATIONS TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY.   2. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION LIST AND PLAN.   3. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES IN GOOD   CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A   300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY   RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION.   PROVIDE CONDITION FOR ALL TREES AND RELOCATION   POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS.   4. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED   PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR CLD 25 ZONING   DISTRICT. IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE AS ALLOWED BY   TABLE IV-7 AND DEFINITIONS IN SECTION 94-109. SHOW HOW   THE STANDARDS FOR THE TYPES OF OPEN SPACE ARE MET FOR   VEGETATED AREAS AND TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED ON   TABLE IV-8.       5. ADD RELOCATED TREES OR PALMS TO THE PLANT LIST AND   COUNT THEM TOWARD THE REQUIRED TREES.       6. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED STREET TREES AT   ONE FOR EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR   STREETSCAPE LENGTH, AND SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED PER   SECTION 94-113 AND 94-116.       7. THERE APPEAR TO BE CONFLICTS IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS   BETWEEN EXISTING TREES AND WATER AND SEWER LINES ON THE   LANDSCAPE PLAN. ADJUST LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES TO   RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING TREES AND LANDSCAPING   IN THE OPEN SPACE. THE REQUIRED STREET TREES PROPOSED   ALONG CLEARWATER ARE IN CONFLICT WITH AN EXISTING SEWER   LINE.       8. PROVIDE A COMPLETE PLANT LIST.       9. REMOVE HIGHRISE CULTIVAR AND INDICATE SPECIES LIVE   OAK.       10. PROVIDE THE 50 REQUIRED FLORIDA FRIENDLY POINTS   BASED ON THE FINAL PLANT LIST PER SECTION 94-443(G).       11. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT   SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL   ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT   SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF   SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA   WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA   LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED ON THE   PLANT LIST.               CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.     Review Stop PARK PARKING Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time   Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop POLICE POLICE Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time   Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS Rev No 2 Status P Date 03-24-2021 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 03-24-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date 03-24-2021 Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-03-24 10:50:03 PASSED WITH A PROVISO.THE COMPACTORS CONTAINERS SHALL   BE FRONT LOAD TYPE IN ORDER TO BE SERVICED BY THE   CITY`S SANITATION COLLECTION FRONT LOADER VEHICLES.       DEPT OF PUBLIC WORKS   MATT HEJAZI   [email protected]   561-822-2045 Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-08-2020 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 09-08-2020 Time   Rev Time   Received By   Date 09-08-2020 Time   Sent To   Notes 2020-09-08 17:02:10 PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:   1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID   WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE AND TYPE OF   THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR) THAT WILL BE   UTILIZED THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION   SERVICE.   2- DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAI, IF APPLICABLE. FOR A   FREESTANDING SITE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, THE ENCLOSURE   SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST REVISION OF CITY OF WEST   PALM BEACH GENERAL CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE   STANDARD, GC-7.   3- AUTO TURN FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER   TRUCK WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECS:   - TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT   - TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT   - TURNING RADIUS:   - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT   - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT   - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT   4- DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP AND   RECYCLING CONTAINERS.       MATT HEJAZI   DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS   [email protected]   561-822-2045     Review Stop STORM STORMWATER Rev No 2 Status P Date 04-06-2021 Cont ID   Sent By tward Date 04-06-2021 Time 11:00 Rev Time 0.00 Received By tward Date 04-06-2021 Time 11:42 Sent To   Notes 2021-04-06 11:41:46 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE   3/31/2021 SUBMITTAL. THEY CAN BE ADDRESSED DURING   ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.       1. SHOW ON THE DEMOLITION PLAN, SHEET C-03, THE   EXISTING DRAINAGE PIPE CONNECTIONS FOR THE TWO CATCH   BASINS IN THE NORTHEAST AREA OF THE SITE.       2. THE PGD PLAN (SHEET C-04) CALLS OUT 8' X 10'   EXFILTRATION TRENCH BUT THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH DETAIL   ON SHEET C-06 SHOWS 10' X 6.5' TRENCH DIMENSIONS.       3. THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH DETAIL SHOWS A WEIR   ELEVATION OF 15.70 FT NAVD.   A. WHERE IS THIS WEIR LOCATED?   B. LOWEST FINISHED GRADE IS 16.10. SUGGEST USING   CRUSHED CONCRETE BASE INSTTEAD OF LIMEROCK BASE TO   CONTEND WITH POTENTIAL SATURATED BASE CONDITIONS.   C. THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE OF THE LAWN OVER THE   RAINTANKS IS SHOWN TO BE 16.50' NAVD. SHOULD THE   FINISHED GRADE BE A MINIMUM OF 1 FOOT ABOVE THE WEIR   ELEVATION?       4. ADD VERTICAL DATUM REFERENCE AND CONVERSION EQUATION   TO NGVD1929 ON EVERY SHEET WITH ELEVATION INFORMATION.       5. SHOW MINIMUM HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN S.S.M.H.   #4 AND THE 8" WATER MAIN TO THE NORTH AND NORTHWEST OF   THE STRUCTURE.       6. CHECK WITH LAURA LE, PUBLIC UTILITIES ENGINEERING,   WHETHER TO INCLUDE IN THE DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED   SANITARY SYSTEM ON CLEARWATER DRIVE THE 0.1' DROP   ACROSS THE MANHOLES AS INDICATED ON THE SEWER MANHOLE   DETAIL.       7. IF THE TRENCH CUT FOR THE PROPOSED 12" WATER MAIN IS   WITHIN THE NORTHBOUND LANE OF CLEARWATER DRIVE, THE   FULL WIDTH OF THE NORTHBOUND LAND WILL NEED TO BE   MILLED AND RE-SURFACED.       8. AVOID HAVING VALVE COVERS FALL WITHIN THE CURB AND   GUTTER.       9. THE EXISTING WATER MAIN WILL NEED TO BE PROPERLY   RESTRAINED DUE TO THE PIPE DEFLECTIONS AND VALVES.       TRACY WARD, P.E.   SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT   [email protected]   561-494-1120 (O)   561-351-0510 (M)         Review Stop STORM STORMWATER Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-10-2020 Cont ID   Sent By tward Date 09-10-2020 Time 15:37 Rev Time 0.00 Received By tward Date 09-10-2020 Time 16:46 Sent To   Notes 2020-09-10 16:38:11 THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL   DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION   PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE   ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT   APPLICATION PROCESSES.   THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE   PLAN APPROVAL:       1. LIST THE VERTICAL DATUM CONVERSION BETWEEN NAVD1988   AND NGVD1929 ON THE SURVEY.       2. CLEAN UP THE OVERLAPPING SPOT GRADES ON THE SURVEY.       3. ON THE CIVIL PLANS, LIST THE VERTICAL DATUM ON EVERY   SHEET THAT HAS ELEVATION DATA.       4. BE CONSISTENT IN THE VERTICAL DATUM BEING USED. THE   SURVEY IS USING NAVD1988. SHEETS C-02 AND C-03 LISTS   NGVD1929. SHEET C2-04 LISTS NAVD1988. IF USING   NAVD1988, THEN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NAVD1988 AND   NGVD1929 ALSO NEEDS TO BE LISTED ON THE SHEET.       5. USE THE LATEST CITY DETAILS.       6. THE SFWMD ERP MODIFICATION IS TO BE OBTAINED THROUGH   NORMAL PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMISSION AND REVIEW AND NOT   OBTAINED THROUGH THE SELF-CERTIFICATION PROCESS.       7. REMOVE THE DRIVEWAY APRON AND INSTALL TYPE F CURB &   GUTTER AND GREENSPACE BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND CURB.   REMOVE ADA MATS ON EITHER SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY THAT IS   BEING REMOVED AND REPAIR THE SIDEWALK FLAGS.       8. DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE DEWATERING DRAWDOWN CURVE   CANNOT INTERSECT THE HYDROSTATIC SURFACE OF CLEAR LAKE.       9. SHOW THE FIRE HYDRANT ALONG CLEARWATER DRIVE ON THE   CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS.       10. NOTE, IN TIMES OF DROUGHT, SFWMD AND/OR THE CITY   MAY NOT ALLOW THE USE OF POTABLE WATER TO MAINTAIN THE   WATER LEVEL IN THE WET RETENTION AREA.       11. EXFILTRATION TRENCH IS PROPOSED WITHIN THE BUILDING   FOOT PRINT. THERE NEEDS TO BE SUFFICIENT VERTICAL   CLEARANCE FOR MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT TO ACCESS AND CLEAN   THE DRAINAGE STRUCTURES.       12. THE EXILTRATION TRENCH WILL EVENTUALLY NEED TO BE   REHABILITATED OR REPLACED TO RE-ESTABLISH THE DRAINAGE   CAPACITY. DESIGN AND LOCATION OF THE EXFILTRATION   TRENCH SHOULD TAKE THIS INTO ACCOUNT.       13. SUGGEST ADDING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES (MANHOLES) AT   THE EAST AND SOUTH ENDS OF THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH   SYSTEM TO ALLOW TRAPPED AIR TO ESCAPE FROM THE SYSTEM.       14.MANHOLE LIDS HAVE BEEN KNOWN TO BE BLOWN OFF WHEN   HIGH RISE ROOF DRAINS ARE CONNECTED TO THE DRAINAGE   SYSTEM. CONSIDER USING A DEEP AND/OR HEAVY MANHOLE LID   TO MINIMIZE THIS OCCURANCE.       14. CONFIRM THE BOTTOM OF THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH WILL   BE 14 FEET BELOW FINISHED GRADE AS DEPICTED ON SHEET   C-04.       15. REPLACE THE SIDEWALK AT THE NEW DRIVEWAY LOCATION   WITH 6-INCH THICK CONCRETE.           THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO   ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING   BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.       1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY   BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.       2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED   WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.       3.. PROVIDE SFWMD ERP PERMIT MODIFICATION.       TRACY WARD, PE   SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT   561-494-1120 (O)   561-351-0510 (M)   [email protected]     Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING Rev No 4 Status P Date 05-18-2021 Cont ID   Sent By vnoel Date 05-18-2021 Time 08:51 Rev Time 0.00 Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-05-18 08:54:33 PASSED WITH CONDITIONS:       1. ABANDONED WATER AND SEWER TO BE REMOVED ON FINAL   ENG. PLANS.   2. PROFILE TO BE INCLUDED ON FINAL ENG. PLANS. Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING Rev No 3 Status F Date 03-26-2021 Cont ID   Sent By vnoel Date 03-26-2021 Time 09:21 Rev Time 0.00 Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-03-26 09:42:39 1. ABANDONED WATER AND SEWER LINES WILL NEED TO BE   REMOVED, NOT GROUTED IN PLACE.   2. PROFILE OF NEW WATER AND SEWER CAN WAIT TILL   ENGINEERING APPLICATION BUT IF ANY CONFLICTS ARISE THE   DEVELOPER WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE OTHER UTILITY   RELOCATION.   3. CUSTOMER SERVICE ( MARK HURLEY ) WILL NEED TO   APPROVE NEW METER/BACKFLOW CONFIGURATION IN SE CORNER.   4. PLEASE PROVIDE COPY OF CONSENT FROM MASTER   ASSOCIATION. Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING Rev No 2 Status F Date 11-05-2020 Cont ID   Sent By vnoel Date 11-05-2020 Time 10:04 Rev Time 0.00 Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2020-11-05 10:35:52 1. DUE TO PROXIMITY TO PROPOSED TREES, WATER MAIN ALONG   CLEARWATER WILL ALSO NEED TO BE RELOCATED.   2. SANITARY SEWER LINE RUNNING WEST FROM CLEARWATER   WILL BE A PRIVATE LINE TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE MASTER   ASSOCIATION. CITY POINT OF SERVICE WILL BE PROPOSED MH   #2.   3. THE METER/BACKFLOWS/IRRIGATION ASSEMBLIES IN THE SE   CORNER NEEDS TO BE RE-WORKED. IT DOES NOT APPEAR THERE   IS ROOM ENOUGH BETWEEN THE EXISTING CONCRETE   POLE/ANCHORS AND THE BUILDING TO SERVICE THE METER.   4. AS THE SURVEY INCLUDES THE OVERALL PROPERTY, THE   MASTER ASSOC. NEEDS TO BE A CO-APPLICANT.           FOLLOWING ARE COMMENTS FROM LAURA LE, PUBLIC UTILITIES   ENGINEER       1. NEED TO SHOW EXIST LATERALS AND EXIST WATER   SERVICES, IF ANY; THE MOST OF THE LATERALS HAVE   RECENTLY BEEN LINED   2. DID THEY TV THE SAN SEWER RECENTLY? DOES PIPE SIZE   MATCH SURVEYED INFO?   3. EXIST SAN MH NEED TO BE REHABBED. NOT SURE IF THAT   WAS DONE RECENTLY.   4. NEED A PROFILE OF THE NEW SAN SEWER   5. THE SAN SEWER REDUCED BACK TO 8? JUST UPSTREAM OF   THE LIFT STATION. WE WILL NEED TO LOOK AT THE PIPE   DOWNSTREAM OF THE PROJECT.   WE WILL ALSO CHECK THE PUMPS AT THE LIFT STATION   6. IS THERE AN EASEMENT FOR THE EXIST 8? COMING FROM   AUSTRALIAN AVE? IS IT CITY?S OWNED AND MAINTAINED?     Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-08-2020 Cont ID   Sent By vnoel Date 09-08-2020 Time 10:53 Rev Time   Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2020-09-08 11:15:27 1. SURVEY NEEDS TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED.   2. LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES NEEDS TO BE FIELD   LOCATED, NOT PER CITY GIS.   3. NEED COPY OF ALL DOCUMENTS SHOWN IN TITLE POLICY.   NEED APPLICANT TO EXPLAIN HOW THIS CONDOMINIUM   ASSOCIATION WILL WORK WITH THE COMMON AREA.   4. STORMWATER WILL NEED TO REVIEW FOR THE OFF-SITE   RETENTION.   5. IT APPEARS THAT THERE ARE 2 OWNERS OF THIS OVERALL   PROPERTY. WILL NEED CONSENT OF THE ADJOINING EDGE   MASTER ASSOC.   6. EXISTING SANITARY ALONG CLEARWATER MAY HAVE RECENTLY   BEEN LINED.   7. THERE IS CONCERN OF THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS IN CLOSE   PROXIMITY TO THE SANITARY.   8. WHAT DOES THE DRIVEWAY TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF   THE EDGE CONNECT TO? IT APPEARS TO BE A CONCRETE   WALKWAY? IS THIS A FIRE EXIT?   9. THIS SITE MAY NEED TO BE REPLATTED. Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 4 Status F Date 03-31-2021 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 03-31-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-03-31 15:38:27 TRAFFIC COMMENTS   1. NOT ACKNOWLEDGED. PER COUNTY RECOMMENDATION: AN   INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHALL BE CONDUCTED AT THE BANYAN   AND CLEARWATER INTERSECTION, AS SOON AS EXISTING ROAD   CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. DEPENDING ON THE RESULTS AND   FINDINGS OF SUCH ANALYSIS, DEVELOPER MAY NEED TO   PROVIDE MITIGATION MEASUREMENTS   2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. AUTOTURN ANALYSIS: VEHICLES'   DYNAMIC ENVELOPE MUST BE COLORED SO TO DISTINGUISH FROM   ROAD/BUILDING LINES. A BACK-LOADING TRUCK WAS USED AS   DESIGN VEHICLE, BUT PATHS SHOWN SEEM TO MODEL A FRONT   LOADER ONE. PLEASE PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR A   SERVICE/MOVING TRUCK ACCESSING THE INTERNAL DOCKS AREA.   PLEASE SUBMIT AUTOTURN ANALYSIS RESULTS SEPARATE FROM   OTHER DOCUMENTS/PLANS.   3. NOT SATISFIED. TDM: IN ORDER TO PROPERLY IDENTIFY   THE RIGHT STRATEGIES, PLEASE DETERMINE THE NUMBER OF   DAILY AND PEAK-HOUR VEHICLES REDUCTION REQUIRED TO   CLEAR THE 1% SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON THE ROADWAYS   IDENTIFIED IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY.   4. NOT SATISFIED. COORDINATE WITH THE COUNTY TO EXTEND   S AUSTRALIAN AVE SOUTHBOUND LEFT-TURN LANE MEDIAN AT   THE ONE CLEARLAKE WAY INTERSECTION. SUCH MODIFICATION   WILL ALLOW SOUTHBOUND LEFT-TURN VEHICLES ONLY, WHILE   PREVENTING WESTBOUND LEFT-TURN MOVEMENTS WITHOUT THE   NEED OF A PORK-CHOP ISLAND INSTALLATION. IN CASE OF   NEGATIVE RESPONSE FROM THE COUNTY ON SUCH   IMPLEMENTATION, PLEASE PROVIDE CORRESPONDING STATEMENT   OR CORRESPONDENCE ON THE MATTER.   5. NOT SATISFIED. AUSTRALIAN AVE AND CLEARWATER PL   INTERSECTION: RESTRIPE THE WESTBOUND LEG SO TO   ACCOMMODATE TWO LEFT-TURN ONLY LANES AND ONE LEFT &   RIGHT LANE. COORDINATE WITH THE COUNTY FOR THE   ADDITIONAL SIGNAL HEAD NEEDED. IN CASE OF NEGATIVE   RESPONSE FROM THE COUNTY ON SUCH IMPLEMENTATION, PLEASE   PROVIDE CORRESPONDING STATEMENT OR CORRESPONDENCE ON   THE MATTER.       VALERIO ORICCHIO   CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER   561-494-1092   [email protected]     Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 3 Status F Date 03-24-2021 Cont ID   Sent By elevesqu Date 03-24-2021 Time 16:19 Rev Time 0.00 Received By elevesqu Date 03-24-2021 Time 16:19 Sent To   Notes 2021-03-24 16:19:26 Z20080008 - 350 S AUSTRALIAN ? R3 - 2021-03-21   TRAFFIC COMMENTS   1. PER COUNTY RECOMMENDATION: AN INTERSECTION ANALYSIS   SHALL BE CONDUCTED AT THE BANYAN AND CLEARWATER   INTERSECTION, AS SOON AS EXISTING ROAD CONSTRUCTION IS   COMPLETED. DEPENDING ON THE RESULTS AND FINDINGS OF   SUCH ANALYSIS, DEVELOPER MAY NEED TO PROVIDE MITIGATION   MEASUREMENTS   2. AUTOTURN ANALYSIS. VEHICLES? DYNAMIC ENVELOPE MUST   BE COLORED SO TO DISTINGUISH FROM ROAD/BUILDING LINES.   A BACK-LOADING TRUCK WAS USED AS DESIGN VEHICLE, BUT   PATHS SHOWN SEEM TO MODEL A FRONT LOADER ONE. PLEASE   PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR A SERVICE/MOVING TRUCK   ACCESSING THE INTERNAL DOCKS AREA. PLEASE SUBMIT   AUTOTURN ANALYSIS RESULTS SEPARATE FROM OTHER   DOCUMENTS/PLANS.   3. TDM. IN ORDER TO PROPERLY IDENTIFY THE RIGHT   STRATEGIES, PLEASE DETERMINE THE NUMBER OF DAILY AND   PEAK-HOUR VEHICLES REDUCTION REQUIRED TO CLEAR THE 1%   SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON THE ROADWAYS IDENTIFIED IN THE   TRAFFIC STUDY.   4. COORDINATE WITH THE COUNTY TO EXTEND S AUSTRALIAN   AVE SOUTHBOUND LEFT-TURN LANE MEDIAN AT THE ONE   CLEARLAKE WAY INTERSECTION. SUCH MODIFICATION WILL   ALLOW SOUTHBOUND LEFT-TURN VEHICLES ONLY, WHILE   PREVENTING WESTBOUND LEFT-TURN MOVEMENTS WITHOUT THE   NEED OF A PORK-CHOP ISLAND INSTALLATION. IN CASE OF   NEGATIVE RESPONSE FROM THE COUNTY ON SUCH   IMPLEMENTATION, PLEASE PROVIDE CORRESPONDING STATEMENT   OR CORRESPONDENCE ON THE MATTER.   5. AUSTRALIAN AVE AND CLEARWATER PL INTERSECTION:   RESTRIPE THE WESTBOUND LEG SO TO ACCOMMODATE TWO   LEFT-TURN ONLY LANES AND ONE LEFT & RIGHT LANE.   COORDINATE WITH THE COUNTY FOR THE ADDITIONAL SIGNAL   HEAD NEEDED. IN CASE OF NEGATIVE RESPONSE FROM THE   COUNTY ON SUCH IMPLEMENTATION, PLEASE PROVIDE   CORRESPONDING STATEMENT OR CORRESPONDENCE ON THE   MATTER.       VALERIO ORICCHIO   CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER   561-494-1092   [email protected]     Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-28-2020 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 11-20-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2020-10-28 17:54:51 TRAFFIC COMMENTS   1. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER ONCE OBTAINED   2. PROVIDE A PARAGRAPH IN THE REPORT DISCUSSING   SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT NEWLY   GENERATED TRIPS, INCLUSIVE OF A SUMMARY TABLE IN THE   REPORT LISTING ONLY THE ROADWAY(S) SIGNIFICANTLY   IMPACTED.   3. PROVIDE SYNCHRO/HCM ANALYSIS FOR THE FOLLOWING   INTERSECTIONS:   A. ACCESS DRIVE AND S AUSTRALIAN AVE (UNSIGNALIZED)   B. BANYAN BLVD AND CLEARWATER PLACE (UNSIGNALIZED)   ROADWORK MAY PARTIALLY PRECLUDE DATA COLLECTION ON   BANYAN, BUT NOT ON AUSTRALIAN.       SITE PLAN COMMENTS   4. SHOWCASE DRIVEWAY(S) AND CURB DETAIL FOR PROPERTIES   ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROAD ALONG CLEARWATER DR   GENERAL COMMENTS   5. PROVIDE TDM STRATEGIES IN ORDER TO MITIGATE THE   PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT?S SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS TO THE   ROADWAY SYSTEM   6. BASED ON THE RESULTS OF THE INTERSECTION ANALYSIS,   CITY MAY REQUIRE INSTALLATION OF A HALF-PORK CHOP   ISLAND ON ONE CLEARLAKE WAY IN ORDER TO ENFORCE BY   DESIGN RIGHT-TURN-ONLY VEHICLE MOVEMENTS TO AUSTRALIAN   AVE.       VALERIO ORICCHIO   CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER   561-494-1092   [email protected]     Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-09-2020 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 09-09-2020 Time   Rev Time   Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2020-09-09 16:35:12 TRAFFIC COMMENTS       1) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER   2) FIGURES SHALL BE NUMBERED FOR PROPER REFERENCE   3) TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES DO NOT SEEM   COMPLETELY CORRECT   3A) FOR EXAMPLE: 40% OF TRAFFIC HEADS SOUTH ON   AUSTRALIAN AVE, BUT THE SPLITS AT OKEECHOBEE BLVD DO   NOT SUM CORRECTLY (FIGURE SHOWS: 20%, 5%, 10%)   3B) PLEASE REVIEW AND REVISE INCORRECT DISTRIBUTION   PERCENTAGES   4) PROVIDE A FIGURE WITH SATELLITE AERIAL SHOWCASING   SITE LOCATION AND RADIUS OF DEVELOPMENT INFLUENCE   5) EXEMPTION FROM CONCURRENCY, DOES NOT IMPLY EXEMPTION   FROM HIGHLIGHTING AND REPORTING PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT'S   SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS   5A) PROVIDE A PARAGRAPH IN THE REPORT DISCUSSING   SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT' NEWLY   GENERATED TRIPS, INCLUSIVE OF A TABLE LISTING THE   ROADWAY(S) SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACTED AND RELATED   PERFORMANCE MEASURES.   6) PROVIDE SYNCHRO/HCM ANALYSIS FOR THE FOLLOWING   INTERSECTIONS:   6A) CLEARWATER PLACE AND S AUSTRALIAN AVE (SIGNALIZED)   6B) ACCESS DRIVE AND S AUSTRALIAN AVE (UNSIGNALIZED)   6C) BANYAN BLVD AND CLEARWATER PLACE (UNSIGNALIZED)       SITE PLAN COMMENTS       7) IDENTIFY EXACT DUMPSTER LOCATION FOR GARBAGE TRUCK   PICKUP OPERATIONS   8) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS OF GARBAGE AND SERVICE   TRUCKS OPERATIONS   9) REDUCE THE NUMBER OF ACCESS POINT/DRIVEWAYS ON   CLEARWATER DR TO ONE.   10) SHOWCASE DRIVEWAY(S) AND CURB DETAIL FOR PROPERTIES   ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROAD ON CLEARWATER DR   11) CHAOTIC INTERNAL CIRCULATION SCHEME, HAVE ONE LANE   IN EACH DIRECTION AT THE MAIN DRIVEWAY THROUGH THE   BUILDING   11A) CONSIDER IMPLEMENTING A VALET/DROP-OFF AREA IN   LIEU OF BY-PASS LANE(S)           VALERIO ORICCHIO   CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER   561-494-1092   [email protected]     Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 4 Status P Date 03-31-2021 Cont ID   Sent By elevesqu Date 03-31-2021 Time 13:57 Rev Time 0.00 Received By elevesqu Date 03-31-2021 Time 13:56 Sent To   Notes 2021-03-31 14:02:51 PROVISOS:       A. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHALL BE ADDRESSED DURING THE   BUILDING PERMIT PROCESS:       1. THE DESIGN OF THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE SHALL BE   SUBMITTED THROUGH AN AMENDMENT AND SUBJECT TO DAC   REVIEW. THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE SHALL EXPLORE THE   INCORPORATION OF THE AIPP REQUIREMENT. THE AMENDMENT   SHALL INCLUDE RENDERINGS WHICH SHOW INTERACTION OF   PUBLIC OPEN SPACE WITH BUILDING.       2. GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS SHALL MAINTAIN TRANSPARENCY   BETWEEN GROUND FLOOR COMMERCIAL SPACES AND EXTERIOR.       3. PLEASE SUBMIT REVISED SECTION A-A TO ACCURATELY   REFLECT PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AND WALL SEATING.       4. ALL ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED TO THE   HEIGHT OF THE EQUIPMENT. ALL WALL MOUNTED EQUIPMENT   SHALL BE ARCHITECTURALLY SCREENED OR PAINTED TO MATCH   BUILDING FA?ADE       5. ALL GRADE CHANGES SHOULD OCCUR INTERIOR TO THE   BUILDING, NOT ON THE SIDEWALK/ROW       6. EXACT AMOUNT OF CAR SHARE SPACES OR NEED FOR ANY TO   BE DETERMINED THROUGHOUT BUILDING PERMIT PROCESS       7. ALL FDC SHALL BE WALL MOUNTED BEHIND LANDSCAPE BEDS   IF AUTHORIZED BY THE CITY.       8. THE PARKING GARAGE ENTRANCE SHALL BE TREATED,   INCLUDING THE CEILING FOR THE FIRST 20 FEET. ALL   PORTIONS OF THE PARKING GARAGE THAT CAN BE SEEN FROM   THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK OR STREET SHALL BE TREATED   INCLUDING THE CEILING, AT MINIMUM TO THE FIRST 20 FEET.   ALL GARAGE LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED FROM THE PUBLIC   SIDEWALK AND STREETS.       9. THE INCLUSION OF A GATE TO THE SOUTH OF THE EDGE   PARKING GARAGE SHALL BE EXAMINED TO SCREEN THE DUMPSTER   STAGING AREA.       10. PROVIDE ARCHITECTURAL SCREENING GATE NOT JUST GATE   ARM TO SCREEN LOADING AREA FROM ROW.       11. ALL STREET LIGHTS, TREE GRATES, BOLLARDS, PAVERS OR   ANY OTHER STREETSCAPE ELEMENTS INSTALLED WITHIN THE   CITY?S ROW SHALL COMPLY WITH CITY?S STANDARDS, AND   SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DIVISION AND THE   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT DURING THE BUILDING   PERMIT PROCESS. ANY FEES ASSOCIATED WITH THE REMOVAL OF   EXISTING STREET LIGHTS SHALL BE A COST TO THE OWNER.       12. THE PROJECT IS REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE ART IN   PUBLIC PLACES ORDINANCE.   13. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST BUILDING PERMIT,   THE APPLICANT SHALL PREPARE A CONSTRUCTION SITE   SECURITY AND MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY   OF WEST PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT CPTED OFFICIAL.       14. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE   STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND   IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.       15. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.       16. IRRIGATION FOR STREET TREES AND LANDSCAPING IN THE   RIGHT OF WAYS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT,   SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS FROM THE SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT.   ALL EXISTING CITY IRRIGATION LINES RUNNING TO   INDIVIDUAL AREAS OR TREES SHALL BE REMOVED AND CAPPED   IN SUCH A WAY TO ENSURE CITY IRRIGATION SUPPLY LINES   SHALL REMAIN INTACT AND CONTINUOUS FOR OTHER AREAS   SERVED BY THE LINES       17. A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN THAT SHOWS LOCATION OF LIGHT   POLES, AND ILLUSTRATES LOCATION OF TREES SHALL BE   SUBMITTED AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW.   PHOTOMETRICS SHALL INCLUDE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, ALL   SIDEWALKS AND PATHS AND PARKING AREAS.       18. SITE LOCATIONS OF GROUND MOUNTED UTILITIES SHALL   INCLUDE REVIEW BY ZONING.       19. ALL GROUND MOUNTED UTILITIES SHALL BE SCREENED BY   LANDSCAPING TO THE LARGEST EXTENT POSSIBLE.       20. AN ENCROACHMENT EASEMENT MAY BE REQUIRED FOR THE   ENCROACHMENT OF BALCONIES INTO THE EDGE MASTER   ASSOCIATION PROPERTY.       21. THE PROJECT SHALL CONTRIBUTE TO THE TROLLEY FEE DUE   TO THE INCLUSION OF MICROUNITS, AT A RATE ESTABLISHED   BY RESOLUTION.       22. THE NECESSARY ELECTRICAL CONNECTIONS WILL BE   PROVIDED FOR THE MICROMOBILITY STATION PER CITY TRAFFIC   ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS.       23. THE GATE AT EGRESS DRIVE SHALL BE OF ARCHITECTURAL   MATERIAL, NOT JUST A GATE ARM, TO HIDE THE LOADING AREA   FROM THE ROW.       24. THE TRASH COLLECTION PLAN WILL BE WORKED OUT   BETWEEN THE OWNER AND EDGE CONDO TO DETERMINE HOW MANY   TRASH PICKUP DAYS ARE REQUIRED.       25. THE SIDEWALK ELEVATION SHALL BE MAINTAINED ACROSS   ANY DRIVEWAY.       26. EXTEND THE MEDIAN ON AUSTRALIAN TO PREVENT LEFT   TURN OUT FROM CLEARWATER ACCESS DRIVE. IF THE EXTENSION   IS NOT APPROVED BY THE COUNTY, THIS CONDITION WILL NOT   APPLY.       B. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHALL BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO   ISSUANCE OF FINAL CO:   27. PAVEMENT SHALL BE RESURFACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH   CITY STANDARDS TO ANY AREA WHERE PAVEMENT MARKINGS ARE   REMOVED.       28. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF   WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO THE   DEVELOPMENT. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE   MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.           LIZ LEVESQUE, URBAN DESIGN PLANNER       PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA APONTE, CITY URBAN DESIGNER   WITH ANY QUESTIONS. [email protected] OR 561 822 1439 Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 3 Status F Date 03-22-2021 Cont ID   Sent By elevesqu Date 03-22-2021 Time 10:34 Rev Time 0.00 Received By elevesqu Date 03-31-2021 Time 13:56 Sent To   Notes 2021-03-22 10:34:50         GENERAL COMMENTS:   1. SATISFIED   2. SATISFIED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NECESSARY TO   MAKE FINAL DETERMINATION OF SITE CALCULATIONS.   A. SATISFIED. WHAT ARE THE LEGAL PARAMETERS THAT   REGULATE THE MASTER ASSOCIATION?   B. SATISFIED. IS DRAINAGE FOR PHASE II ALLOWED WITHIN   THE MASTER ASSOCIATION AREA? CAN IT BE LOCATION OUTSIDE   PHASE II PARCEL?   C. SATISFIED. IS EDGE ASSOCIATION CONSENTING FOR OPEN   SPACE TO BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC? ARE THEY AWARE OPEN   SPACE PERMITS THE PUBLIC TO ENTER?   D. CONDITION OF APPROVAL: EXTENSION OF BALCONIES INTO   EDGE ASSOCIATION PROPERTY ? NEED TO CONFIRM IF   PERMITTED ? EASEMENT SHALL BE REQUIRED   E. SATISFIED. MEASUREMENT OF SIDE INTERIOR SETBACK AND   REAR SETBACK DETERMINED BASED ON HOW PROPERTY LINES   WILL BE MODIFIED WITH PROJECT   F. SATISFIED. HOW WILL INTERNAL DRIVE BE MAINTAINED AND   OPERATED?   3. SATISFIED   4. ONGOING. CAN EXISTING DRAINAGE BE DISENGAGED?   STORMWATER DRAINAGE UNDER REVIEW BY CITY ENGINEERING   DEPARTMENT.   5. SATISFIED   6. SATISFIED.   7. SATISFIED.   8. SATISIFED.   9. SATISFIED   10. SATISFIED   11. SATISFIED   12. SATISFIED   13. SATISFIED   14. SATISFIED.   15. SATISFIED   16. SATISFIED   17. SATISFIED   18. SATISFIED   19. SATISFIED   20. SATISFIED   21. SATISFIED   22. SATISFIED   23. SATISFIED   24. SATISFIED   25. ONGOING ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. HOW WILL TRASH   PICKUP WORK FOR NEW BUILDING? WHERE WILL EXISTING TRASH   FOR EDGE BUILDING BE RELOCATED?   NEED CONFIRMATION FROM MATT HEJAZI. MAY WANT TO HAVE   FULL DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. ONGOING DISCUSSION WITH PUBLIC   WORKS   26. SATISFIED.   27. SATISFIED   28. SATISFIED   29. SATISFIED   30. SATISFIED   31. SATISFIED.   32. SATISFIED   33. SATISFIED.   34. SATISFIED   35. SATISFIED   36. SATISFIED.   37. SATISFIED   38. CONDITION OF APPROVAL. PROVIDE PHOTOMETRIC ANALYSIS   PLANS ? TO INCLUDE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, ALL BUILDING   ENTRANCES AND PATHWAYS ? INCLUDING DOG PARK ENTRANCE   COORDINATED DURING BUILDING PERMIT PROCESS   LANDSCAPE:   39. SATISFIED   40. SATISFIED.   41. SATISFIED   42. CONDITION OF APPROVAL. SPECIFIC TYPE OF PUBLIC OPEN   SPACE AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS REQUIRED. PLEASE   INCLUDE SPECIFIC TYPE AND TABLES ILLUSTRATING HOW   REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC OPEN SPACE TYPES HAVE BEEN   MET. NEED ADDITIONAL DETAIL TO DETERMINE IF OPEN SPACE   IS AN IMPROVEMENT ON SITE. THE INITIAL DESIGN DOES NOT   SEEM TO BE A BIG IMPROVEMENT TO PUBLIC SPACE. NEED TO   COORDINATE   DESIGN OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TO BE FURTHER REVIEWED, AND   BROUGHT BACK TO DOWNTOWN ACTION COMMITTEE AT FUTURE   DATE WITH INCORPORATION OF AIPP REQUIREMENT   43. SATISFIED.   44. CONDITION OF APPROVAL. PROVIDE HARDSCAPE PLAN   ILLUSTRATING PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL PAVERS, FOUNTAIN   (INCLUDING DEPTH OF FOUNTAIN AND PROTECTIVE BARRIER),   PAVER BANDING/CONCRETE BANDING, SEATING OPEN SPACE,   ETC.   DESIGN OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TO BE FURTHER REVIEWED, AND   BROUGHT BACK TO DOWNTOWN ACTION COMMITTEE AT FUTURE   DATE WITH INCORPORATION OF AIPP REQUIREMENT   45. NOT SATISFIED. LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET PL-1 DOES NOT   SEEM TO ACCOUNT FOR FIRE, IRRIGATION AND WATER ASSEMBLY   ADJACENT TO PROPOSED OPEN SPACE ? PLEASE COORDINATE   WITH CIVIL PLAN   REPEAT COMMENT ? NOT SHOWN ON LANDSCAPE PLANS: LOW   SHRUBS CAN BE PLANTED IN FRONT OF FIRE BACKFLOW,   IRRIGATION METER. FROM PAST CASES, THEY CANNOT BE   PLANTED IN FRONT OF DOMESTIC BACKFLOW BUT PLEASE   CONFIRM WITH PUBLIC UTILITIES. THE SIDEWALK BETWEEN   THESE UTILITIES AND THE BACK OF CURB IS APPROXIMATELY   12 FEET ? CAN BE REDUCED TO 8 FEET TO ACCOMMODATE   ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE IN FRONT OF UTILITIES. PLEASE   EXAMINE POSSIBILITY AND SEE HOW IT INTERACTS WITH THE   REST OF THE PROPOSED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND SIDEWALK   ALONG CLEARWATER   46. SATISFIED   47. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ARE TREES PROPOSED ALONG   CLEARWATER DRIVE IN A LANDSCAPE BED? THIS IS PREFERRED   IF 8-FOOT SIDEWALK CLEARANCE CAN BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN   BUILDING FA?ADE AND BED (APPEARS IT CAN)   TREES SHALL BE PLANTED ALONG CURB LINE IN PLANTER BED   RATHER THAN FA?ADE PLANTING. CONTINUOUS PLANTER BED CAN   BE LOCATED ALONG ENTIRE FA?ADE WHERE THERE IS NO   CROSSWALK OR CURB CUT   48. SATISFIED   49. SATISFIED.   50. NOT SATISFIED. ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES ALONG   BUILDINGS SOUTH FA?ADE SHALL BE SCREENED WITH LANDSCAPE   HEDGE TO BEST EXTENT POSSIBLE. PLEASE INCLUDE IN   LANDSCAPE PLAN   COORDINATE LANDSCAPE SCREENING AROUND THESE UTILITIES   WHEN THEY ARE IN THEIR FINAL APPROVED LOCATION. FOR THE   SAKE OF SITE PLAN REVIEW, PLEASE PLACE LOW LANDSCAPE ON   ALL SIDES OF THE FDC, FIRE BACKFLOW, IRRIGATION METER,   AND ON THREE SIDES OF THE WATER METER AND DOMESTIC   BACKFLOW (CANNOT BE PLANTED ON THE ACCESSED SIDE OF   WATER METER AND DOMESTIC BACKFLOW). IN THE CASE THAT   PUBLIC UTILITIES REQUIRES ANY OF THESE UTILITIES TO BE   LOCATED ON THE ROW (NOT WITHIN PRIVATE PROPERTY),   PLEASE PLACE UP AGAINST BUILDING WITH FA?ADE PLANTING,   OR ALONG CURB LINE SURROUNDING BY PLANTING. CONTINUE   COORDINATION WITH ZONING DEPARTMENT   51. SATISFIED   52. SATISFIED.   53. CONDITION OF APPROVAL. DUE TO THE SITE?S SIZE AND   THE REQUEST FOR VARIANCES, THIS PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO   DAC REVIEW PRIOR TO COMPLETING PPRC PROCESS   PUBLIC OPEN SPACE SUBJECT TO FURTHER DAC REVIEW WITH   INCORPORATION OF AIPP   54. CONDITION OF APPROVAL. APPLICANT SHALL MEET AIPP   REQUIREMENTS ? CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, AIPP COORDINATOR   AT [email protected]   CIVIL:   55. SATISFIED   56. SATISFIED.   57. CONDITION OF APPROVAL. PLEASE NOTE, LOCATION OF ALL   ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES, INCLUDING BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES,   WATER METERS, FDC, FIRE BACKFLOWS, GENERATORS,   IRRIGATION METERS, ETC. REQUIRE ZONING APPROVAL IN   COORDINATION WITH PUBLIC WORKS AND CITY ENGINEERING   DEPARTMENT   COORDINATION BETWEEN UTILITIES, FIRE, AND ZONING SHALL   CONTINUE THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. ZONING SHALL   BE INCLUDED IN FINAL LOCATION PLACEMENT   58. SATISFIED   59. SATISFIED   60. SATISFIED   61. SATISFIED   62. SATISFIED   63. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FOR   SIDEWALKS, PARALLEL PARKING SPACES, OPEN SPACE AREAS,   ETC. PLEASE PROVIDE A PARALLEL CUB CUT ACROSS ALL   PARKING GARAGE ENTRANCES, SHOWING SLOPE OF SIDEWALK   PROVIDE CROSS SECTION PARALLEL TO CLEARWATER DRIVE,   ACROSS PARKING GARAGE ENTRANCE THAT SHOWS THE SLOPE OF   THE SIDEWALK FROM NORTH TO SOUTH AS IT CROSSES THE   ENTRANCE. SIDEWALK SHALL BE KEPT LEVEL ACROSS ENTRANCE   64. CONDITION OF APPROVAL. SHOW ALL DOORWAYS ON CIVIL   PLANS AND INDICATE HOW GRADE CHANGES ARE BEING   ACCOMMODATED. ALL GRADE CHANGES SHOULD OCCUR INTERIOR   TO THE BUILDING, NOT ON THE SIDEWALK/ROW   NEW COMMENTS OCTOBER 30, 2020:   65. SATISFIED   ARCHITECTURE:   66. NOT SATISFIED. IS A GATE PROPOSED AT THE SOUTH   EGRESS ONLY DRIVE ONTO CLEARWATER? PLEASE INDICATE ON   SITE PLAN AND ON ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. PLEASE INCLUDE   MATERIAL DETAIL   PLEASE PROVIDE ARCHITECTURAL SCREENING GATE NOT JUST   GATE ARM TO SCREEN LOADING AREA FROM ROW   67. SATISFIED   68. CONDITION OF APPROVAL. PLEASE INCLUDE RENDERINGS   SHOWING INTERACTION OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE WITH PROPOSED   BUILDING, AND VIEW FROM NORTHWEST LOOKING SOUTHEAST,   AND VIEW FROM SOUTH EAST CORNER LOOKING NORTH WEST.   69. CONDITION OF APPROVAL: PLEASE NOTE, WINDOW MATERIAL   TINTING SHALL MAINTAIN TRANSPARENCY BETWEEN GROUND   FLOOR COMMERCIAL SPACES AND EXTERIOR. PLEASE PROVIDE   MATERIAL SPEC (UNDERSTANDING THIS MAY CHANGE DURING   PERMIT PROCESS, BUT TRANSPARENCY MUST BE MAINTAINED)   70. SATISFIED   71. SATISFIED   72. SATISFIED   73. SATISFIED   74. CONDITION OF APPROVAL: PLEASE INCLUDE AN OPAQUE   GATE SOMEWHERE APPROPRIATE WITHIN THE SPACE BETWEEN THE   EDGE AND PROPOSED 350 PROJECT TO SCREEN THE BACK OF   HOUSE/DUMPSTER STAGING AREA FROM THOSE WITHIN THE   CIRCULAR DRIVE AND THE PUBLIC VIEW FROM THE ACCESS   EASEMENT ROADWAY   75. SATISFIED.   TRAFFIC:   76. SATISIFED   77. SATISFIED.   LANDSCAPE:   78. SATISFIED   79. SATISFIED   80. CONDITON OF APPROVAL: OVERALL, STAFF FEELS THAT THE   PUBLIC OPEN SPACE NEEDS TO BE ENHANCED AND BETTER   DESIGNED TO INTERACT WITH THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED   BUILDING. A DIFFERENT TYPE OF OPEN SPACE WILL NEED TO   BE PICKED AND THE CRITERIA MET. STAFF RECOMMENDS A   CONFERENCE CALL WITH THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER AND URBAN   DESIGN TO DISCUSS FURTHER   PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TO BE FURTHER REVIEWED BY DAC WITH   INCORPORATION OF AIPP REQUIREMENT   CIVIL/SITE:   81. SATISFIED   82. SATISFIED   83. SATISFIED   84. ONGOING. ADD LABEL TO PROPOSED STAGING AREA FOR   TRASH ? CURRENTLY READS AS ONLY STAGING FOR THE EDGE   TRASH. PLEASE CLARIFY THAT THIS IS ALSO PROPOSED   STAGING FOR PROPOSED 350 BUILDING. PLEASE ILLUSTRATE   NUMBER OF COMPACTORS AND RECYCLING BINS THAT CAN FIT   WITHIN THIS STAGING AREA SAFELY ? USE ACTUAL DIMENSIONS   OF EDGE COMPACTORS AND PROPOSED 350 COMPACTORS. THIS   WILL NEED TO BE REVIEWED BY PUBLIC WORKS (MATT HEJAZI)   WAITING FOR REVIEW BY PUBLIC WORKS   85. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. CIVIL PLANS APPEAR TO SHOW   WALL AROUND DUMPSTER STAGING AREA BUT DOES NOT APPEAR   ON OTHER PLANS. PLEASE CLARIFY   MIGHT WANT A FULL ENCLOSURE NOT JUST CURB ? CHECK WITH   MATT HEJAZI   86. SATISFIED   87. SATISFIED   88. SATISFIED   89. SATISFIED   90. COA: PLEASE AMEND THE CROSS SECTION A-A TO   ACCURATELY REFLECT PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AND WALL SEATING   TO BE REVISED FOR BUILDING PERMIT AFTER PUBLIC OPEN   SPACE IS APPROVED   91. SATISFIED   92. SATISFIED   93. SATISFIED   94. SATISIFIED       PROPOSED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:   1. ALL PORTIONS OF THE PARKING GARAGE SHALL BE PAINTED   (CEILING AND WALLS INCLUDING ANY UTILITIES AND PIPING)   TO A DEPTH OF 20 FEET. ALL PARKING GARAGE LIGHTING   SHALL BE SHIELDED   2. PLEASE NOTE, ALL PROJECTS WITH MICROUNITS SHALL   CONTRIBUTE TO THE CITY TROLLEY FUND AT A RATE OF $10   PER MICROUNIT PER MONTH   3. ALL ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED TO THE   HEIGHT OF THE EQUIPMENT. ALL WALL MOUNTED EQUIPMENT   SHALL BE ARCHITECTURALLY SCREENED OR PAINTED TO MATCH   BUILDING FA?ADE   4. ALL GRADE CHANGES SHOULD OCCUR INTERIOR TO THE   BUILDING, NOT ON THE SIDEWALK/ROW   5. EXACT AMOUNT OF CAR SHARE SPACES OR NEED FOR ANY TO   BE DETERMINED THROUGHOUT BUILDING PERMIT PROCESS   6. EASEMENT REQUIRED FOR EXTENSION OF BALCONIES INTO   EDGE MASTER ASSOCIATION PROPERTY   7. DETAILS OF PROPOSED DOG PARK TO BE COORDINATED   DURING BUILDING PERMIT PROCESS. STAFF RECOMMENDS   ANALYZING PROPOSED ENTRANCE TO DOG PARK. LOOKS LIKE THE   ONLY WAY TO GET THERE IS THROUGH THE CORRIDOR THAT GOES   IN FRONT OF THE GENERATOR ROOMS OR HAVING TO WALK   THROUGH THE ASPHALT DUMPSTER STAGING AREA. NOT A ZONING   REQUIREMENT BUT A RECOMMENDATION FOR THE TENANT?S   ENJOYMENT   8. PROVIDE PHOTOMETRIC ANALYSIS PLANS ? TO INCLUDE   PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES AND PATHWAYS   ? INCLUDING DOG PARK ENTRANCE   9. DESIGN OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TO BE FURTHER REVIEWED,   AND BROUGHT BACK TO DOWNTOWN ACTION COMMITTEE AT FUTURE   DATE WITH INCORPORATION OF AIPP REQUIREMENT   A. PLEASE INCLUDE RENDERINGS SHOWING INTERACTION OF   PUBLIC OPEN SPACE WITH PROPOSED BUILDING, AND VIEW FROM   NORTHWEST LOOKING SOUTHEAST, AND VIEW FROM SOUTH EAST   CORNER LOOKING NORTH WEST.   B. PLEASE AMEND THE CROSS SECTION A-A TO ACCURATELY   REFLECT PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AND WALL SEATING   10. PLEASE NOTE, WINDOW MATERIAL TINTING SHALL MAINTAIN   TRANSPARENCY BETWEEN GROUND FLOOR COMMERCIAL SPACES AND   EXTERIOR. PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL SPEC WITH BUILDING   PERMIT   11. PLEASE INCLUDE AN OPAQUE GATE SOMEWHERE APPROPRIATE   WITHIN THE SPACE BETWEEN THE EDGE AND PROPOSED 350   PROJECT TO SCREEN THE BACK OF HOUSE/DUMPSTER STAGING   AREA FROM THOSE WITHIN THE CIRCULAR DRIVE AND THE   PUBLIC VIEW FROM THE ACCESS EASEMENT ROADWAY   SEE OTHER DEPARTMENT COMMENTS FOR ADDITIONAL STANDARD   PROPOSED PROVISOS       LIZ LEVESQUE, URBAN DESIGN PLANNER   561 822 1426   [email protected]       ANA MARIA APONTE, CITY URBAN DESIGNER   561 822 1439   [email protected] Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-30-2020 Cont ID   Sent By elevesqu Date 10-30-2020 Time 12:32 Rev Time 0.00 Received By elevesqu Date 10-30-2020 Time 12:31 Sent To   Notes 2020-10-30 12:32:24         GENERAL COMMENTS:   1. SATISFIED   2. ONGOING DISCUSSION WITH APPLICANT LEGAL TEAM AND   CITY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NECESSARY TO MAKE FINAL   DETERMINATION OF SITE CALCULATIONS.   A. WHAT ARE THE LEGAL PARAMETERS THAT REGULATE THE   MASTER ASSOCIATION?   B. IS DRAINAGE FOR PHASE II ALLOWED WITHIN THE MASTER   ASSOCIATION AREA? CAN IT BE LOCATION OUTSIDE PHASE II   PARCEL?   C. IS EDGE ASSOCIATION CONSENTING FOR OPEN SPACE TO BE   OPEN TO THE PUBLIC? ARE THEY AWARE OPEN SPACE PERMITS   THE PUBLIC TO ENTER?   D. EXTENSION OF BALCONIES INTO EDGE ASSOCIATION   PROPERTY ? NEED TO CONFIRM IF PERMITTED   E. MEASUREMENT OF SIDE INTERIOR SETBACK AND REAR   SETBACK DETERMINED BASED ON HOW PROPERTY LINES WILL BE   MODIFIED WITH PROJECT   F. HOW WILL INTERNAL DRIVE BE MAINTAINED AND OPERATED?   3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED   REMOVE ACTIVE USE, TRANSPARENCY DATA FOR THE EDGE. ONLY   DATA FOR THE ENTIRE SITE TO REMAIN IS THE PUBLIC OPEN   SPACE. PLEASE UPDATE FAR DATA LABEL FOR SUBJECT PARCEL   TO ?350? (CURRENTLY READS ?305?)   4. ONGOING. CAN EXISTING DRAINAGE BE DISENGAGED?   STORMWATER DRAINAGE UNDER REVIEW BY CITY ENGINEERING   DEPARTMENT.   5. SATISFIED   6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHEET A ? 0.01   A. SATISFIED. LABEL STREET NAMES ASSOCIATED WITH THEIR   DESIGNATIONS UNDER MIN. ACTIVE USE TABLE   B. SATISFIED. INCLUDE ACTUAL PROVIDED SETBACK FOR SIDE   INTERIOR SOUTH   C. SEE NEW COMMENT #70 INCLUDE VARIANCE TABLE FOR   PROPOSED VARIANCES. PLEASE NOTE, SETBACK FOR GROUND   FLOOR, PODIUM AND TOWER ARE THREE SEPARATE VARIANCE   REQUESTS   D. SATISFIED. MINIMUM GUEST PARKING FOR MICROUNITS IS   1/20 NOT 0, PLEASE UPDATE IN TABLE   7. SATISFIED.   8. SATISIFED. THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF CAR-SHARE STATIONS   MAY BE REDUCED BY ONE CAR-SHARE STATION PER EVERY 13   ON-SITE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED. CAR SHARE STATIONS CAN   BE REDUCED BY NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED FOR THE   MICROUNITS. DEDUCTION BASED ON CURRENT NUMBERS WOULD BE   9 SPACES, RESULTING IN A NEED FOR 9 CAR SHARE SPACES.   EXACT AMOUNT OF CAR SHARE SPACES OR NEED FOR ANY TO BE   DETERMINED THROUGHOUT BUILDING PERMIT PROCESS   9. SATISFIED   10. SATISFIED   11. SATISFIED   12. SATISFIED   13. SATISFIED   14. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. REDUCE NUMBER OF DRIVEWAY AND   CURB CUTS FROM PROJECT. ELIMINATE FROM CLEARWATER DRIVE   IF POSSIBLE. NO MORE THAN ONE ON CLEARWATER IF ALL   CANNOT BE ELIMINATED. REDUCE INTERNAL TO TWO LANES ONLY   CAN THE APRON WIDTH BE REDUCED? PLEASE CHECK ? SEEM   WIDER THAN NECESSARY   15. SATISFIED   16. SATISFIED   17. SATISFIED   18. SATISFIED   19. SATISFIED   20. SATISFIED   21. SATISFIED   22. SATISFIED   23. SATISFIED   24. PARTIALLY SATISFIED: SHOW ADJACENT PROPERTY CURB   LINES, PARKING LOTS, STRUCTURES ETC. ON SITE PLAN AND   CIVIL PLANS   NOT SHOWN ON CIVIL PLANS   25. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. HOW WILL TRASH PICKUP WORK FOR   NEW BUILDING? WHERE WILL EXISTING TRASH FOR EDGE   BUILDING BE RELOCATED?   NEED TO HAVE DISCUSSION WITH EDGE BUILDING FOR THEIR   CURRENT STORAGE TO CONFIRM. NEED CONVERSATION WITH MATT   HEJAZI OF PUBLIC WORKS TO CONFIRM TRUCK ENTRY ON PAVED   CIRCULAR DRIVE   26. SATISFIED.   27. SATISFIED   28. SATISFIED   29. SATISFIED   30. SATISFIED   31. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SUBMIT COLOR RENDERINGS FROM   GROUND VIEW PERSPECTIVE. INCLUDE LANDSCAPE AS PROPOSED,   AT PLANTING HEIGHT FOR ACCURATE CONSTRUCTION   REPRESENTATION.   32. SATISFIED   33. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE SUBMIT CONTEXTUAL   ELEVATIONS   NEED MORE DETAILED CONTEXTUAL ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS   34. SATISFIED   35. SATISFIED   36. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. WHERE IS THE ACCESS TO THE DOG   PARK PROPOSED? WILL IT CONNECT TO CLEARWATER DRIVE?   PLEASE PROVIDE MORE DETAIL   LOCATION IS FINE, HOWEVER NEED TO CONFIRM THAT EDGE   BUILDING HAS ALTERNATIVE MEANS TO TRANSPORT TRASH BINS   TO STAGING AREA. NEED TO CONFIRM THIS ARRANGEMENT WILL   WORK FOR ALL PARTIES INVOLVED   37. SATISFIED   38. CONDITION OF APPROVAL. PROVIDE PHOTOMETRIC ANALYSIS   PLANS ? TO INCLUDE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, ALL BUILDING   ENTRANCES AND PATHWAYS ? INCLUDING DOG PARK ENTRANCE   COORDINATED DURING BUILDING PERMIT PROCESS   LANDSCAPE:   39. SATISFIED   40. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. EXISTING OAK TREES ALONG   CLEARWATER DRIVE MAY BE ABLE TO BE RELOCATED TO   PLANTING BED CLOSER TO CURB- SEE LANDSCAPE COMMENTS.   NEED TO COORDINATE WITH ENGINEERING FOR UTILITY LINE   PLACEMENT   PROPOSED TREES SHALL BE ALONG CURB LINE AS SEWER LINE   IS BEING RELOCATED   41. SATISFIED   42. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SPECIFIC TYPE OF PUBLIC OPEN   SPACE AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS REQUIRED. PLEASE   INCLUDE SPECIFIC TYPE AND TABLES ILLUSTRATING HOW   REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC OPEN SPACE TYPES HAVE BEEN   MET. NEED ADDITIONAL DETAIL TO DETERMINE IF OPEN SPACE   IS AN IMPROVEMENT ON SITE. THE INITIAL DESIGN DOES NOT   SEEM TO BE A BIG IMPROVEMENT TO PUBLIC SPACE. NEED TO   COORDINATE   PASSAGEWAY OPEN SPACE DOES NOT WORK FOR THIS SITE. THIS   LOCATION OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE DOES NOT MEET THE   DEFINITION OF PASSAGEWAY FROM SECTION 94-109.   43. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PRESERVE THE TWO   TREES THAT EXIST ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE DRY RETENTION   AREA (NEW PROPOSED OPEN SPACE) BY MEANS OF ISLANDS OR   SHIFTING/REMOVING SOME PARKING SPACES   SATISFIED AS LONG AS RAY CARANCI HAS DETERMINED THAT   THE TREES ARE NOT WORTH PRESERVING.   44. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE HARDSCAPE PLAN   ILLUSTRATING PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL PAVERS, FOUNTAIN   (INCLUDING DEPTH OF FOUNTAIN AND PROTECTIVE BARRIER),   PAVER BANDING/CONCRETE BANDING, SEATING OPEN SPACE,   ETC.   NEED TO SEE MATERIAL EXAMPLES AND DETAILS FOR PAVERS,   BANDING, ETC. REQUIRED PRIOR TO DAC (STAFF UNDERSTANDS   EXACT COLOR AND MATERIAL CHOICES MAY BE MODIFIED   THROUGHOUT BUILDING PERMIT PROCESS, BUT A CONCEPT IS   NEEDED)   45. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET PL-1 DOES   NOT SEEM TO ACCOUNT FOR FIRE, IRRIGATION AND WATER   ASSEMBLY ADJACENT TO PROPOSED OPEN SPACE ? PLEASE   COORDINATE WITH CIVIL PLAN   LOW SHRUBS CAN BE PLANTED IN FRONT OF FIRE BACKFLOW,   IRRIGATION METER. FROM PAST CASES, THEY CANNOT BE   PLANTED IN FRONT OF DOMESTIC BACKFLOW BUT PLEASE   CONFIRM WITH PUBLIC UTILITIES. THE SIDEWALK BETWEEN   THESE UTILITIES AND THE BACK OF CURB IS APPROXIMATELY   12 FEET ? CAN BE REDUCED TO 8 FEET TO ACCOMMODATE   ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE IN FRONT OF UTILITIES. PLEASE   EXAMINE POSSIBILITY AND SEE HOW IT INTERACTS WITH THE   REST OF THE PROPOSED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND SIDEWALK   ALONG CLEARWATER   46. SATISFIED   47. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ARE TREES PROPOSED ALONG   CLEARWATER DRIVE IN A LANDSCAPE BED? THIS IS PREFERRED   IF 8-FOOT SIDEWALK CLEARANCE CAN BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN   BUILDING FA?ADE AND BED (APPEARS IT CAN)   TREES SHALL BE PLANTED ALONG CURB LINE IN PLANTER BED   RATHER THAN FA?ADE PLANTING. CONTINUOUS PLANTER BED CAN   BE LOCATED ALONG ENTIRE FA?ADE WHERE THERE IS NO   CROSSWALK OR CURB CUT   48. SATISFIED   49. PARTIALLLY SATISFIED. CANNOT DETERMINE IF TREES ON   NORTH SIDE OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE ARE EXISTING. STAFF   DOES NOT WANT THE EXISTING MATURE TREES AT THIS   LOCATION REMOVED   CAN TREES K AND L BE PRESERVED? THEY DON?T SEEM TO NEED   TO BE REMOVED   50. NOT SATISFIED. ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES ALONG   BUILDINGS SOUTH FA?ADE SHALL BE SCREENED WITH LANDSCAPE   HEDGE TO BEST EXTENT POSSIBLE. PLEASE INCLUDE IN   LANDSCAPE PLAN   COORDINATE LANDSCAPE SCREENING AROUND THESE UTILITIES   WHEN THEY ARE IN THEIR FINAL APPROVED LOCATION. FOR THE   SAKE OF SITE PLAN REVIEW, PLEASE PLACE LOW LANDSCAPE ON   ALL SIDES OF THE FDC, FIRE BACKFLOW, IRRIGATION METER,   AND ON THREE SIDES OF THE WATER METER AND DOMESTIC   BACKFLOW (CANNOT BE PLANTED ON THE ACCESSED SIDE OF   WATER METER AND DOMESTIC BACKFLOW). IN THE CASE THAT   PUBLIC UTILITIES REQUIRES ANY OF THESE UTILITIES TO BE   LOCATED ON THE ROW (NOT WITHIN PRIVATE PROPERTY),   PLEASE PLACE UP AGAINST BUILDING WITH FA?ADE PLANTING,   OR ALONG CURB LINE SURROUNDING BY PLANTING. CONTINUE   COORDINATION WITH ZONING DEPARTMENT   51. SATISFIED   52. SATISFIED.   53. ONGOING. DUE TO THE SITE?S SIZE AND THE REQUEST FOR   VARIANCES, THIS PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO DAC REVIEW PRIOR   TO COMPLETING PPRC PROCESS   54. ONGOING. APPLICANT SHALL MEET AIPP REQUIREMENTS ?   CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, AIPP COORDINATOR AT   [email protected]   CIVIL:   55. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. MAINTAIN AND ENHANCE   CONNECTION FROM PROPOSED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TO MULTI   MODAL CENTER THROUGH ADA RAMP AND CROSSWALK   PLEASE INDICATE EXISTING CROSSWALK AND MAINTAINED   CONNECTION ON PLANS   56. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. DO NOT SEE DETAIL FOR WS-8   WATER METER OR WS-11 IRRIGATION METER AS LABELED ON   SHEET C-03   SHEET C-12 NOT INCLUDED WITH SUBMITTAL PACKAGE   57. ONGOING. PLEASE NOTE, LOCATION OF ALL ABOVE GROUND   UTILITIES, INCLUDING BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES, WATER METERS,   FDC, FIRE BACKFLOWS, GENERATORS, IRRIGATION METERS,   ETC. REQUIRE ZONING APPROVAL IN COORDINATION WITH   PUBLIC WORKS AND CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT   IRRIGATION METER ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. LOCATE GATE   VALVES OFF OF PUBLIC SIDEWALK AREA. CAN DCDA BE LOCATED   FURTHER WEST TO PROVIDE FOR LANDSCAPE SCREENING BETWEEN   SIDEWALK AND DCDA? SAME FOR IRRIGATION RPZ? IN THE CASE   THAT PUBLIC UTILITIES REQUIRE ANY OF THESE UTILITIES TO   BE LOCATED ON THE ROW (NOT WITHIN PRIVATE PROPERTY),   PLEASE PLACE UP AGAINST BUILDING WITH FA?ADE PLANTING,   OR ALONG CURB LINE SURROUNDING BY PLANTING. CONTINUE   COORDINATION WITH ZONING DEPARTMENT       58. SATISFIED   59. SATISFIED   60. SATISFIED   61. SATISFIED   62. SATISFIED   63. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FOR   SIDEWALKS, PARALLEL PARKING SPACES, OPEN SPACE AREAS,   ETC. PLEASE PROVIDE A PARALLEL CUB CUT ACROSS ALL   PARKING GARAGE ENTRANCES, SHOWING SLOPE OF SIDEWALK   STAFF WAS NOT CLEAR ? MEANT TO ASK FOR A CROSS SECTION   ACROSS THE PARKING GARAGE THAT IS PARALLEL TO   CLEARWATER, NOT PARALLEL TO THE GARAGE ENTRANCE DRIVE   64. CONDITION OF APPROVAL. SHOW ALL DOORWAYS ON CIVIL   PLANS AND INDICATE HOW GRADE CHANGES ARE BEING   ACCOMMODATED. ALL GRADE CHANGES SHOULD OCCUR INTERIOR   TO THE BUILDING, NOT ON THE SIDEWALK/ROW   TO ENSURE THAT THIS IS MAINTAINED, WILL BE A CONDITION   OF APPROVAL FOR BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW   NEW COMMENTS OCTOBER 30, 2020:   65. SCAD SHALL BE APPROVED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL.   ARCHITECTURE:   66. IS A GATE PROPOSED AT THE SOUTH EGRESS ONLY DRIVE   ONTO CLEARWATER? PLEASE INDICATE ON SITE PLAN AND ON   ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. PLEASE INCLUDE MATERIAL DETAIL   67. IS A GATE PROPOSED FOR THE ACCESS TO THE PARKING   GARAGE? THE RETAIL/COMMERCIAL PARKING SPACES WILL NEED   TO BE ACCESSIBLE BY THE GENERAL PUBLIC. PLEASE EXPLAIN   HOW THIS WILL WORK   68. PLEASE INCLUDE RENDERINGS SHOWING INTERACTION OF   PUBLIC OPEN SPACE WITH PROPOSED BUILDING, AND VIEW FROM   NORTHWEST LOOKING SOUTHEAST, AND VIEW FROM SOUTH EAST   CORNER LOOKING NORTH WEST.   69. PLEASE NOTE, WINDOW MATERIAL TINTING SHALL MAINTAIN   TRANSPARENCY BETWEEN GROUND FLOOR COMMERCIAL SPACES AND   EXTERIOR. PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL SPEC (UNDERSTANDING   THIS MAY CHANGE DURING PERMIT PROCESS, BUT TRANSPARENCY   MUST BE MAINTAINED)   70. PLEASE UPDATE VARIANCE TABLE TO REFLECT TWO   VARIANCES ? NOT THREE (ONE FOR GROUND FLOOR AND PODIUM,   ONE FOR PARKING ABOVE 7TH FLOOR)   71. DOG PARK STILL LABELED ON ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ON   SIDE INTERIOR LOT LINE   72. WHAT IS THE FUNCTION OF THE 16?6? SPACE ON NORTH   SIDE OF NORTH DRIVEWAY ON CLEARWATER? CAN RETAIL SPACE   BE EXTENDED HERE   73. SOME OF THE CONCRETE FINS COULD BE REMOVED IN ORDER   TO BETTER REFLECT PLANAR BREAKS AS THEY ARE PROPOSED IN   THE EXHIBIT. PLEASE SCHEDULE A CALL WITH URBAN DESIGN   TEAM TO DISCUSS   74. PLEASE INCLUDE AN OPAQUE GATE SOMEWHERE APPROPRIATE   WITHIN THE SPACE BETWEEN THE EDGE AND PROPOSED 350   PROJECT TO SCREEN THE BACK OF HOUSE/DUMPSTER STAGING   AREA FROM THOSE WITHIN THE CIRCULAR DRIVE AND THE   PUBLIC VIEW FROM THE ACCESS EASEMENT ROADWAY   75. STAFF RECOMMENDS ANALYZING PROPOSED ENTRANCE TO DOG   PARK. LOOKS LIKE THE ONLY WAY TO GET THERE IS THROUGH   THE CORRIDOR THAT GOES IN FRONT OF THE GENERATOR ROOMS   OR HAVING TO WALK THROUGH THE ASPHALT DUMPSTER STAGING   AREA. NOT A ZONING REQUIREMENT BUT A RECOMMENDATION FOR   THE TENANT?S ENJOYMENT   TRAFFIC:   76. PLEASE UPDATE TRAFFIC STUDY ? NO LONGER LEFT TURN   IN TO SOUTH EGRESS DRIVE AND UPDATE IF ONLY FOR LOADING   EGRESS (NO LONGER FOR OTHER VEHICULAR EGRESS)   LANDSCAPE:   77. OAK TREE PROPOSED VERY CLOSE TO FIRE HYDRANT AT   CIRCULAR PARKING ROW LANDSCAPE ISLAND. IS THIS TOO   CLOSE?   78. STREET TREES ALONG CURB LINE SHALL BE 20-FOOT   PLANTING HEIGHT   79. OVERALL, STAFF FEELS THAT THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE   NEEDS TO BE ENHANCED AND BETTER DESIGNED TO INTERACT   WITH THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDING. A DIFFERENT   TYPE OF OPEN SPACE WILL NEED TO BE PICKED AND THE   CRITERIA MET. STAFF RECOMMENDS A CONFERENCE CALL WITH   THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER AND URBAN DESIGN TO DISCUSS   FURTHER   CIVIL/SITE:   80. PUBLIC BICYCLE RACK ON CLEARWATER OUTSIDE   COMMERCIAL SPACE, PLEASE REORIENT TO BE PARALLEL WITH   BUILDING TO FIT 6-FOOT-LONG BICYCLES (LEAVE 24? FROM   BUILDING FA?ADE)   81. RE-LABEL GROUND FLOOR UNITS FROM RESIDENTIAL TO   LIVE/WORK TO MATCH SITE PLAN   82. PROPOSED CURBING OUTSIDE PARKING GARAGE ENTRANCES   ON CLEARWATER DRIVE PREVENT CLEAR SIDEWALK PATH (IF   THIS IS A SIDEWALK ALONG THE BUILDING FA?ADE) LEADING   TO DOG PARK. SUGGEST PROVIDING FLUSH SIDEWALK WITH   GARAGE ENTRANCES   83. ADD LABEL TO PROPOSED STAGING AREA FOR TRASH ?   CURRENTLY READS AS ONLY STAGING FOR THE EDGE TRASH.   PLEASE CLARIFY THAT THIS IS ALSO PROPOSED STAGING FOR   PROPOSED 350 BUILDING. PLEASE ILLUSTRATE NUMBER OF   COMPACTORS AND RECYCLING BINS THAT CAN FIT WITHIN THIS   STAGING AREA SAFELY ? USE ACTUAL DIMENSIONS OF EDGE   COMPACTORS AND PROPOSED 350 COMPACTORS. THIS WILL NEED   TO BE REVIEWED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES (MATT HEJAZI)   84. CIVIL PLANS APPEAR TO SHOW WALL AROUND DUMPSTER   STAGING AREA BUT DOES NOT APPEAR ON OTHER PLANS. PLEASE   CLARIFY   85. CIVIL SHEET C-08 ILLUSTRATES VAULT THOUGH LABELED   TO REMOVE ON SHEET C-03. PLEASE CLARIFY   86. PLEASE REMOVE PUMP HOUSE OUTLINE ON SHEET C-08 AND   LIGHT POLE THAT IS CURRENTLY LOCATED AT EXISTING OPEN   SPACE?S ENTRANCE FROM CLEARWATER DRIVE (IF BEING   REMOVED)   87. CAN PROPOSED SSMH #2 BE LOCATED OFF OF THE PUBLIC   SIDEWALK? ARE TWO MANHOLES SO CLOSE TO EACH OTHER (SSMH   #2 AND SSMH #1 NECESSARY OR CAN ONE BE REMOVED OR   RELOCATED?   88. PLEASE REMOVE TRUNCATED DOMES AT PARKING GARAGE   ENTRANCES ON CLEARWATER. ONLY INCLUDE AT ROADWAY   INTERSECTIONS (PER CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DEPT.)   89. PLEASE AMEND THE CROSS SECTION A-A TO ACCURATELY   REFLECT PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AND WALL SEATING   90. PLEASE MATCH WIDTH OF CURB CUTS AND APRONS WITH   SITE PLAN   91. CONTINUE 8 FOOT SIDEWALK ENTIRE LENGTH OF PROPERTY   AND TRANSITION OUTSIDE PROPERTY (AT PROJECTS SOUTHEAST   SIDE)       PROPOSED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:   92. ALL PORTIONS OF THE PARKING GARAGE SHALL BE PAINTED   (CEILING AND WALLS INCLUDING ANY UTILITIES AND PIPING)   TO A DEPTH OF 20 FEET. ALL PARKING GARAGE LIGHTING   SHALL BE SHIELDED   93. PLEASE NOTE, ALL PROJECTS WITH MICROUNITS SHALL   CONTRIBUTE TO THE CITY TROLLEY FUND AT A RATE OF $10   PER MICROUNIT PER MONTH   94. ALL ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED TO THE   HEIGHT OF THE EQUIPMENT. ALL WALL MOUNTED EQUIPMENT   SHALL BE ARCHITECTURALLY SCREENED OR PAINTED TO MATCH   BUILDING FA?ADE   95. ALL GRADE CHANGES SHOULD OCCUR INTERIOR TO THE   BUILDING, NOT ON THE SIDEWALK/ROW   96. TRANSPARENCY MUST BE MAINTAINED THROUGH CHOICE OF   GLASS FOR WINDOWS ALONG GROUND FLOOR   SEE OTHER DEPARTMENT COMMENTS FOR ADDITIONAL STANDARD   PROPOSED PROVISOS           LIZ LEVESQUE, URBAN DESIGN PLANNER   561 822 1426   [email protected] Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-04-2020 Cont ID   Sent By elevesqu Date 09-04-2020 Time 10:14 Rev Time 0.00 Received By elevesqu Date 09-04-2020 Time 10:13 Sent To   Notes 2020-09-04 10:15:02     GENERAL COMMENTS:       1. CHANGE ?INFORMAL? TO ?FORMAL? ON COVER SHEET   2. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NECESSARY TO MAKE FINAL   DETERMINATION OF SITE CALCULATIONS.   A. WHAT ARE THE LEGAL PARAMETERS THAT REGULATE THE   MASTER ASSOCIATION?   B. . IS DRAINAGE FOR PHASE II ALLOWED WITHIN THE MASTER   ASSOCIATION AREA? CAN IT BE LOCATION OUTSIDE PHASE II   PARCEL?   C. IS EDGE ASSOCIATION CONSENTING FOR OPEN SPACE TO BE   OPEN TO THE PUBLIC? ARE THEY AWARE OPEN SPACE PERMITS   THE PUBLIC TO ENTER?   D. EXTENSION OF BALCONIES INTO EDGE ASSOCIATION   PROPERTY ? NEED TO CONFIRM IF PERMITTED   E. MEASUREMENT OF SIDE INTERIOR SETBACK AND REAR   SETBACK DETERMINED BASED ON HOW PROPERTY LINES WILL BE   MODIFIED WITH PROJECT   F. HOW WILL INTERNAL DRIVE BE MAINTAINED AND OPERATED?   3. NEED TO DETERMINE BEST WAY TO ORGANIZE SITE DATA FOR   CLARITY THAT ALTHOUGH SEPARATE OWNERSHIP AND SEPARATE   PROJECT, THIS IS CONSIDERED AN AMENDMENT TO THE EDGE   PHASE II PROJECT   4. CAN EXISTING DRAINAGE BE DISENGAGED?   5. NEED TO DETERMINE WHETHER BALCONY ENCROACHMENT INTO   SIDE INTERIOR SETBACK SHALL COUNT TOWARDS REQUEST FOR   SETBACK VARIANCE   6. SHEET A ? 0.01   A. LABEL STREET NAMES ASSOCIATED WITH THEIR   DESIGNATIONS UNDER MIN. ACTIVE USE TABLE   B. INCLUDE ACTUAL PROVIDED SETBACK FOR SIDE INTERIOR   SOUTH   C. INCLUDE VARIANCE TABLE FOR PROPOSED VARIANCES.   PLEASE NOTE, SETBACK FOR GROUND FLOOR, PODIUM AND TOWER   ARE THREE SEPARATE VARIANCE REQUESTS   D. MINIMUM GUEST PARKING FOR MICROUNITS IS 1/20 NOT 0,   PLEASE UPDATE IN TABLE   7. IS TENANT STORAGE UNDER FULLY ENCLOSED AND/OR AC?   ONLY COUNTS TOWARDS FAR IF IT IS FULLY ENCLOSED AND/OR   UNDER AC   8. THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF CAR-SHARE STATIONS MAY BE   REDUCED BY ONE CAR-SHARE STATION PER EVERY 13 ON-SITE   PARKING SPACES PROVIDED. CAR SHARE STATIONS CAN BE   REDUCED BY NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED FOR THE   MICROUNITS. DEDUCTION BASED ON CURRENT NUMBERS WOULD BE   9 SPACES, RESULTING IN A NEED FOR 9 CAR SHARE SPACES.   9. FOR STANDARD UNITS, GUEST PARKING AT 1/20 UNITS   WOULD REQUIRE 9 GUEST PARKING, NOT 10. PLEASE UPDATE   10. PLEASE REDUCE AMOUNT OF PARKING SPACES AROUND   CIRCULAR DRIVE ? STAFF WISHES TO PRESERVE EXISTING ON   SITE TREES AND REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF SURFACE PARKING   SPACES, ESPECIALLY IF PARALLEL PARKING ON CLEARWATER   DRIVE WILL BE UTILIZED FOR RIDE SHARE AND CAR SHARE   11. ARE THE PARKING SPACES AROUND CIRCULAR DRIVE BEING   COUNTED TOWARDS PROJECT?S PARKING? ? NEED TO CONFIRM   HOW IF OFF SITE. PLEASE SEPARATE IN PARKING DATA TABLE   AND INCLUDE SEPARATE LINE FOR PARALLEL PARKING   12. PLEASE SHOW DOUBLE STRIPING OF PARKING SPACES   WITHIN PARKING GARAGE AND CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH   ADDITIONAL WIDTH WHEN ADJACENT TO WALLS.   13. NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES ON 2ND FLOOR DOES NOT   INCLUDE PARKING RAMP, PLEASE AMEND (SHEET A1.01)   14. REDUCE NUMBER OF DRIVEWAY AND CURB CUTS FROM   PROJECT. ELIMINATE FROM CLEARWATER DRIVE IF POSSIBLE.   NO MORE THAN ONE ON CLEARWATER IF ALL CANNOT BE   ELIMINATED. REDUCE INTERNAL TO TWO LANES ONLY   15. CLEARLY INDICATE WHERE 6% SLOPE ENDS AND 12.5%   SLOPE BEGINS ON RAMP FROM 2ND TO 3RD FLOOR AND CHECK TO   MAKE SURE THERE ARE NO PARKING SPACES ON 12.5% SLOPE   16. PLEASE CLARIFY WHERE 8TH LEVEL OF PARKING GARAGE   ENDS. APPEARS TO BE A WALL ABOVE RAMP FROM 7TH TO 8TH   FLOOR. IF THIS IS A DEAD-END, A FULL SPACE TURN AROUND   IS NEEDED PLUS A THREE FOOT SPACE FOR THE VEHICLE TO   BACK INTO IN ORDER TO TURN AROUND. UNLESS THE SPACES   ARE DESIGNATED?   17. PARKING NUMBER LISTED ON SHEET A 1.03 FOR 8TH FLOOR   DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE RIGHT, PLEASE CHECK (MAKE SURE   DOES NOT COUNT FOR SPACES ALREADY INCLUDED IN 7TH FLOOR   CALCULATIONS   18. BICYCLE PARKING:   A. FOR RESIDENTIAL USES ? REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING IS   ONE SPACE PER 15 PROVIDED PARKING SPACES NOT 20. 22   SPACES REQUIRED, PLEASE UPDATE ACCORDINGLY   B. 2 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED FOR PROPOSED   COMMERCIAL SPACE (1/15 PROVIDED PARKING SPACES)   C. 1 BICYCLE SPACE PER 100 FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE FOR   PUBLIC USE. THIS WOULD COUNT OPEN SPACE, RESULTING IN 5   REQUIRED PUBLIC BICYCLE RACKS (NOT INCLUDING   MICROMOBILITY STATION)   D. BASED ON CURRENT SF AND UNIT BREAKDOWN, STAFF COUNTS   148 REQUIRED BICYCLE SPACES (143 INSIDE AND COVERED, 5   OUTSIDE FOR PUBLIC)   E. INCLUDE BICYCLE RACK DETAIL FOR INTERIOR BICYCLE   ROOM BIKE RACKS (ARE THESE WALL MOUNTED?). NEED TO   INDICATE EXACT SPACING REQUIRED FOR INTERIOR RACKS   F. WHERE IS ENTRANCE INTO BICYCLE STORAGE FOR TENANTS?   19. CORRECT LABEL ON SHEET A0.02 FOR LEVELS 2- 9 FAR   FLOOR PLANS ( CURRENTLY LISTS LEVEL 2-81)   20. 30% OF 317?5? IS 95.25 FOR REQUIRED ACTIVE USE,   PLEASE UPDATE ON SHEET A 0.03   21. GROUND FLOOR RESIDENTIAL SHALL BE RAISED A MINIMUM   OF 18 INCHES ABOVE SIDEWALK ? PLEASE ILLUSTRATE   COMPLIANCE   22. SUGGEST ADDITIONAL DOORWAY FROM OPEN SPACE INTO   BUILDING MANAGEMENT TO MEET INTENT OF ACTIVE USE   INTERACTION WITH OPEN SPACE WITHIN CLD DISTRICT   23. PLEASE INCLUDE FOLLOWING EXHIBITS ILLUSTRATING   COMPLIANCE:   A. TRANSPARENCY   B. PLANAR BREAKS ? DOES NOT APPEAR TO MEET PLANAR BREAK   ALONG CLEARWATER DRIVE   C. HORIZONTAL PROJECTIONS   D. FAR TABLE WITH CALCULATIONS FOR EACH FLOOR AND FOR   TOTAL   24. SHOW ADJACENT PROPERTY CURB LINES, PARKING LOTS,   STRUCTURES ETC. ON SITE PLAN AND CIVIL PLANS   25. HOW WILL TRASH PICKUP WORK FOR NEW BUILDING? WHERE   WILL EXISTING TRASH FOR EDGE BUILDING BE RELOCATED?   26. PLEASE PROVIDE COLOR ELEVATIONS WITH DETAILS FOR   MATERIALS. PLEASE INCLUDE EXAMPLE IMAGES OF MATERIALS   FOR BETTER CLARIFICATION. PLEASE INCLUDE EXHIBIT FOR   PARKING GARAGE SCREENING WHICH CLEARLY SHOWS SPACING IN   THE PROPOSED GARAGE SCREENING AND MATERIAL (EXAMPLE   IMAGES WOULD BE HELPFUL) AND DEPTH OF PANELS,   DIFFERENCE IN PANEL DEPTHS. NEED ADDITIONAL DETAIL TO   BE ABLE TO REVIEW AND ENSURE THAT PARKING GARAGE   SCREENING IS EFFICIENT   27. PLEASE ADD FA?ADE ARTICULATION TO NORTH FA?ADE   PARKING GARAGE AREA. PLEASE NOTE, NO BLANK WALLS ARE   PERMITTED THAT CAN BE SEEN FROM ADJACENT STREETS, OR   ADJACENT PROPERTIES (SECTION 94-109 ? BLANK WALL   DEFINITION). ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT SHALL SCREEN   NON-ACTIVE USES THROUGH A COMBINATION OF TWO OR MORE   TREATMENTS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE USE OF   MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION ASSEMBLIES; THE CONTINUATION   OF FENESTRATION PATTERNS, ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES,   ARTICULATION AND RHYTHM; THE APPLICATION OF   ARCHITECTURAL SCREENS, MESHES, LOUVERS, AND GLASS, ETC.   THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE PAINT AND FAUX TREATMENTS OR   SCORING OR PROJECTIONS LESS THAN FOUR INCHES IN DEPTH,   WIDTH OR HEIGHT.   28. NORTH FLOOR PLAN WINDOW LOCATIONS DO NOT MATCH   NORTH ELEVATION- PLEASE COORDINATE. CONSIDER ADDITIONAL   HORIZONTAL ELEMENT ALONG NORTH FA?ADE OF CORNER UNIT   D-3 TO HELP BREAK UP HEIGHT OF BLANK WALL SECTIONS AT   THIS CORNER.   29. PLEASE INCLUDE DOORS IN ELEVATION PLANS   30. WHAT IS THICKNESS OF WHITE BANDING THROUGHOUT THE   FACADES? WILL THIS BE THICK ENOUGH TO CREATE DEPTH TO   THE FEATURE AS INTENDED?   31. PLEASE SUBMIT COLOR RENDERINGS FROM GROUND VIEW   PERSPECTIVE. INCLUDE LANDSCAPE AS PROPOSED, AT PLANTING   HEIGHT FOR ACCURATE CONSTRUCTION REPRESENTATION.   32. PLEASE INCLUDE ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT ON EAST   ELEVATION TO BIKE STORAGE AND STORAGE TO ALLEVIATE   BLANK WALL ALONG THIS FA?ADE.   33. PLEASE SUBMIT CONTEXTUAL ELEVATIONS   34. CONSIDER WHETHER THE PARAPET HEIGHT WILL SCREEN ALL   ROOF-MOUNTED EQUIPMENT ? ROOF MOUNTED EQUIPMENT SHALL   BE SCREENED TO THE HEIGHT OF THE EQUIPMENT THROUGH   PARAPET OR OTHER MEANS   35. BLANK WALL ON FLOORS 10-17 ON EAST ELEVATION (STAIR   AND ELEVATOR AND NORTH SIDE TOWER) ? NEEDS ADDITIONAL   TREATMENT FOR NONACTIVE USE. CONSIDER WINDOWS ON NORTH   TOWER FACING EDGE BUILDING OR OTHER TREATMENT   36. WHERE IS THE ACCESS TO THE DOG PARK PROPOSED? WILL   IT CONNECT TO CLEARWATER DRIVE? PLEASE PROVIDE MORE   DETAIL   37. IS EXISTING ASPHALT ADJACENT TO EXISTING DUMPSTER   ENCLOSURE BEING REMOVED? PLEASE CLARIFY ON ALL PLANS   38. PROVIDE PHOTOMETRIC ANALYSIS PLANS ? TO INCLUDE   PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES AND PATHWAYS   ? INCLUDING DOG PARK ENTRANCE       LANDSCAPE:   39. PLEASE SUBMIT TREE DISPOSITION PLAN   40. EXISTING OAK TREES ALONG CLEARWATER DRIVE MAY BE   ABLE TO BE RELOCATED TO PLANTING BED CLOSER TO CURB-   SEE LANDSCAPE COMMENTS. NEED TO COORDINATE WITH   ENGINEERING FOR UTILITY LINE PLACEMENT   41. SHOW EXISTING PROPERTY LINES ON LANDSCAPE PLANS ?   LANDSCAPE PROPOSED ON EDGE ASSOCIATION PROPERTY CANNOT   COUNT TOWARDS LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS FOR PROJECT- CHECK   WITH RAY   42. SPECIFIC TYPE OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND PRIVATE OPEN   SPACE IS REQUIRED. PLEASE INCLUDE SPECIFIC TYPE AND   TABLES ILLUSTRATING HOW REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC OPEN   SPACE TYPES HAVE BEEN MET. NEED ADDITIONAL DETAIL TO   DETERMINE IF OPEN SPACE IS AN IMPROVEMENT ON SITE. THE   INITIAL DESIGN DOES NOT SEEM TO BE A BIG IMPROVEMENT TO   PUBLIC SPACE. NEED TO COORDINATE   43. PLEASE PRESERVE THE TWO TREES THAT EXIST ON THE   WEST SIDE OF THE DRY RETENTION AREA (NEW PROPOSED OPEN   SPACE) BY MEANS OF ISLANDS OR SHIFTING/REMOVING SOME   PARKING SPACES   44. PROVIDE HARDSCAPE PLAN ILLUSTRATING PROPOSED   CONCEPTUAL PAVERS, FOUNTAIN (INCLUDING DEPTH OF   FOUNTAIN AND PROTECTIVE BARRIER), PAVER   BANDING/CONCRETE BANDING, SEATING OPEN SPACE, ETC.   45. LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET PL-1 DOES NOT SEEM TO ACCOUNT   FOR FIRE, IRRIGATION AND WATER ASSEMBLY ADJACENT TO   PROPOSED OPEN SPACE ? PLEASE COORDINATE WITH CIVIL PLAN   46. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL/SITE PLAN FOR DOORWAY   LOCATIONS ALONG DOG PARK   47. ARE TREES PROPOSED ALONG CLEARWATER DRIVE IN A   LANDSCAPE BED? THIS IS PREFERRED IF 8-FOOT SIDEWALK   CLEARANCE CAN BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN BUILDING FA?ADE AND   BED (APPEARS IT CAN)   48. KEEP CLEAR SIDEWALK OF EIGHT FEET THROUGH ENTIRE   PROJECT WIDTH INCLUDING AREA BETWEEN PUBLIC OPEN SPACE   AND PARALLEL PARKING SPACES AND BETWEEN WALK UP GARDENS   AND CURB LINE   49. CANNOT DETERMINE IF TREES ON NORTH SIDE OF PUBLIC   OPEN SPACE ARE EXISTING. STAFF DOES NOT WANT THE   EXISTING MATURE TREES AT THIS LOCATION REMOVED   50. ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES ALONG BUILDINGS SOUTH FA?ADE   SHALL BE SCREENED WITH LANDSCAPE HEDGE TO BEST EXTENT   POSSIBLE. PLEASE INCLUDE IN LANDSCAPE PLAN   51. OFF SITE LANDSCAPE IN EDGE ASSOCIATION PROPERTY   (ALONG EXISTING DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE AREA) ? WHETHER THIS   CAN BE COUNTED TOWARDS MITIGATION OR LANDSCAPE   CALCULATIONS DEPENDS ON HOW ORIGINAL ASSOCIATION   DOCUMENTS WERE WRITTEN AND ORIGINAL PLAN FOR PHASE I   AND II (SEE COMMENT #2)   52. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAIL OF WALK UP GARDEN- SEE TABLE   IV-7 AND DEFINITION OF WALK UP GARDEN IN SECTION   94-109. WALK UP GARDENS CANNOT BE COVERED   53. DUE TO THE SITE?S SIZE AND THE REQUEST FOR   VARIANCES, THIS PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO DAC REVIEW PRIOR   TO COMPLETING PPRC PROCESS   54. APPLICANT SHALL MEET AIPP REQUIREMENTS ? CONTACT   SYBILLE WELTER, AIPP COORDINATOR AT [email protected]       CIVIL:   55. MAINTAIN AND ENHANCE CONNECTION FROM PROPOSED   PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TO MULTI MODAL CENTER THROUGH ADA   RAMP AND CROSSWALK   56. DO NOT SEE DETAIL FOR WS-8 WATER METER OR WS-11   IRRIGATION METER AS LABELED ON SHEET C-03   57. PLEASE NOTE, LOCATION OF ALL ABOVE GROUND   UTILITIES, INCLUDING BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES, WATER METERS,   FDC, FIRE BACKFLOWS, GENERATORS, IRRIGATION METERS,   ETC. REQUIRE ZONING APPROVAL IN COORDINATION WITH   PUBLIC WORKS AND CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT   58. PARKING SPACES SHALL BE DOUBLE STRIPED   59. BUILDING FOOT PRINT DOES NOT EXACTLY MATCH   ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ? PLEASE CHECK AND AMEND AS   NECESSARY   60. FDC SHALL BE WALL MOUNTED WHENEVER POSSIBLE,   SUBJECT TO FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL       61. NUMBER OF PARALLEL PARKING SPACES ALONG CLEARWATER   DRIVE DOES NOT MATCH SITE PLAN ? PLEASE COORDINATE   62. RELOCATED WATER METER, FIRE BACKFLOW AND ASSEMBLY,   ETC. ? WILL NEED TO COORDINATE WITH PUBLIC WORKS, FIRE   DEPARTMENT AND PUBLIC UTILITIES TO FIND BEST LOCATION   FOR THESE SERVICES AS THEY ARE BEING RELOCATED. THESE   TYPES OF UTILITIES SHOULD NOT BE WITHIN PUBLIC OPEN   SPACE. WILL NEED TO DISCUSS AND FIND BEST SOLUTION AND   ALLOW FOR CONTINUOUS SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO PARALLEL   PARKING SPACES   63. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FOR SIDEWALKS, PARALLEL   PARKING SPACES, OPEN SPACE AREAS, ETC. PLEASE PROVIDE A   PARALLEL CUB CUT ACROSS ALL PARKING GARAGE ENTRANCES,   SHOWING SLOPE OF SIDEWALK   64. SHOW ALL DOORWAYS ON CIVIL PLANS AND INDICATE HOW   GRADE CHANGES ARE BEING ACCOMMODATED. ALL GRADE CHANGES   SHOULD OCCUR INTERIOR TO THE BUILDING, NOT ON THE   SIDEWALK/ROW   PROPOSED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:   65. ALL PORTIONS OF THE PARKING GARAGE SHALL BE PAINTED   (CEILING AND WALLS INCLUDING ANY UTILITIES AND PIPING)   TO A DEPTH OF 20 FEET. ALL PARKING GARAGE LIGHTING   SHALL BE SHIELDED   66. PLEASE NOTE, ALL PROJECTS WITH MICROUNITS SHALL   CONTRIBUTE TO THE CITY TROLLEY FUND AT A RATE OF $10   PER MICROUNIT PER MONTH   67. ALL ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED TO THE   HEIGHT OF THE EQUIPMENT. ALL WALL MOUNTED EQUIPMENT   SHALL BE ARCHITECTURALLY SCREENED OR PAINTED TO MATCH   BUILDING FA?ADE       SEE OTHER DEPARTMENT COMMENTS FOR ADDITIONAL STANDARD   PROPOSED PROVISOS       Print Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved