 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z20080005
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z20080005 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-09-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
09-09-2020 |
Time |
20:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
09-09-2020 |
Time |
20:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-15-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
03-15-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
03-15-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-26-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
RROSSANO |
Date |
01-26-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
01-26-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-01-26 12:39:19 | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER | | | SERVICE SUPERVISOR | | | ? CREATE A SEPARATE WATER OR UTILITY PLAN SHOWING | | | EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER SERVICES. | | | RESPONSE: EXISTING UTILITIES ARE DEPICTED ON DRAWING | | | E-GMY02 (SHEET 2 OF 2) FENCE FILL AND GRADE | | | PLAN. NO WATER OR SEWER WORK IS PROPOSED AS PART OF THE | | | PROPOSED SUBSTATION EXPANSION EXCEPT FOR | | | RAISING ONSITE EXISTING SANITARY CLEANOUTS TO MATCH THE | | | PROPOSED GRADE OF THE ACCESS DRIVE. THUS, A | | | SEPARATE WATER AND SEWER PLAN IS NOT PROVIDED. | | | | | | -FOLLOWUP COMMENT TO RESPONSE: CANNOT CLEARLY SEE WATER | | | METER BOX AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY ON E-GMY02 (SHEET 2). | | | PLEASE DRAW AND LABEL THEM ON PLAN SO THEY ARE CLEARLY | | | VISIBLE AND IN THE CORRECT LOCATION. | | | | | | EXISTING WATER METER HAS HISTORICALLY REMAINED OUTSIDE | | | OF FENCE AND NEEDS TO CONTINUE | | | REMAINING OUTSIDE OF ANY FENCES AND ACCESSIBLE FROM THE | | | STREET. CAN RELOCATED FENCE AROUND IT | | | OR RELOCATE WATER SERVICE/METER. | | | RESPONSE: PER EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE WITH MR. MARK HURLEY | | | ON SEPTEMBER 22, 2020, THE EXISTING | | | METER IS RADIO READ EACH MONTH WITH THE READING | | | LOCATION ACCESSIBLE FROM OUTSIDE OF THE EXISTING | | | PERIMETER CHAIN LINK FENCE. | | | | | | -FOLLOWUP COMMENT TO RESPONSE: FIELD INSPECTION | | | VERIFIED THAT CHAIN LINK FENCE IS CURRENTLY RUNNING | | | OVER METER BOX SUCH THAT THE BOX, LID, AND METER CANNOT | | | BE PROPERLY MAINTAINED. AS PART OF THIS PROJECT, | | | REQUESTING THAT EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE BE ALTERED | | | AROUND METER BOX SO THAT IT IS ACCESSIBLE FOR | | | MAINTENANCE. IF THE ENTIRE FENCE IS BEING REPLACED, THE | | | NEW FENCE NEEDS TO NOT RUN OVER METER BOX AND ALLOW | | | COMPLETE ACCESS FROM EXTERIOR. | | | | | | VERIFY IF THE EXISTING WATER SERVICE AND METER IS FOR | | | 4301 UP THE GROVE LANE OR 5959 N | | | MILITARY TRAIL. DOES 4301 NEED CITY WATER AND CURRENTLY | | | USE ANY. | | | RESPONSE: THE EXISTING WATER SERVICE AND METER ARE FOR | | | 4301 (THE GRAMERCY SUBSTATION) WHICH HAS | | | A SINGLE RESTROOM WITH A TOILET AND SINK. THE GRAMERCY | | | SUBSTATION IS AND UNMANNED RESTRICTED | | | ACCESS FACILITY WITH FPL TWO-MAN MAINTENANCE CREWS | | | AVERAGE TWO TRIPS PER MONTH TO THIS FACILITY, | | | SO THE WATER USE IN MINIMAL. | | | | | | -FOLLOWUP COMMENT TO RESPONSE: THE EXISTING WATER METER | | | IS 1.5INCH AND ADDRESSED AS 5950 N MILITARY TRL IN OUR | | | UTILITY BILLING SYSTEM. THE LAST MONTH BILLING CYCLE | | | REGISTERED ALMOST 3000 GALLONS OF WATER USED VS. THE | | | ESTIMATE OF 200 GALLONS PER MONTH ADVISED IN OTHER | | | RESPONSES. PLEASE CHECK THIS AGAIN AND FIELD VERIFY | | | THAT THIS WATER SERVICE IS NOT FEEDING 5950 N MILITARY | | | TRL PROPERTY. THIS COULD POTENTIALLY BE DONE BY | | | SHUTTING OFF THE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY OR METER AND SEEING | | | WHICH BUILDINGS HAVE WATER. | | | | | | UTILITY EASEMENT MUST BE GRANTED FOR WATER SERVICE AND | | | METER BOX ON PROPERTY IF NONE EXIST. | | | RESPONSE: PER EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE WITH MR. MARK HURLEY | | | ON SEPTEMBER 22, 2020, THE EXISTING | | | METER IS RADIO READ EACH MONTH WITH THE READING | | | LOCATION ACCESSIBLE FROM OUTSIDE OF THE EXISTING | | | PERIMETER CHAIN LINK FENCE. | | | | | | -FOLLOWUP COMMENT TO RESPONSE: RADIO-READING IS | | | SEPARATE FROM UTILITY ACCESS ISSUES. FIELD INSPECTION | | | FOUND THAT THE CHAIN FENCE RUNS OVER THE METER BOX | | | IMPEDING MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES. CANNOT LOCATE METER | | | BOX ON PLAN E-GMY02, BUT IT APPEARS THAT THE METER BOX | | | IS SLIGHTLY INSIDE THE PROPERTY LINE. IF SO, THEN METER | | | BOX NEEDS SMALL UTILITY EASEMENT GRANTED AROUND IT. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-03-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
09-03-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
09-03-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-09-03 09:45:43 | COMMENTS PER RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORD., CITY OF WPB | | | ENG. SERVICES, 561-494-1098: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY | | | OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC | | | RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF | | | YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE | | | MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL | | | IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT | | | [email protected] OR 561-494-1040 FOR FURTHER | | | ASSISTANCE. | | | 2. PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS | | | OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES, | | | INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND | | | SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, | | | METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE | | | SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING | | | GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, | | | ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL | | | INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER | | | LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE | | | PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN | | | VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. | | | PLEASE SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT | | | MATERIAL. ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL | | | EXISTING AND PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, | | | INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & | | | TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL | | | UTILITY CROSSINGS. | | | 3. PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE | | | DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB | | | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION). | | | 4. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND | | | PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER IF ANY (AVERAGE, | | | MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS | | | SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 | | | FOR WATER. | | | 5. SHOW VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION INFORMATION | | | (NAVD 88 AND NGVD 29). | | | 6. PLEASE SHOW INLET PROTECTION FOR THE DRAINAGE INLET | | | ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF UP THE GROVE LN. DIRECTLY ACROSS | | | FROM THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY WORK. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD | | | CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, | | | PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]: | | | | | | -CREATE SEPARATE WATER OR UTILITY PLAN SHOWING EXISTING | | | AND PROPOSED WATER SERVICES. | | | | | | -EXISTING WATER METER HAS HISTORICALLY REMAINED OUTSIDE | | | OF FENCE AND NEEDS TO CONTINUE REMAINING OUTSIDE OF ANY | | | FENCES AND ACCESSIBLE FROM THE STREET. CAN RELOCATE | | | FENCE AROUND IT OR RELOCATE WATER SERVICE/METER. | | | | | | -DEMO PLAN SHOWS AN UNDERGROUND VAULT ADJACENT WATER | | | METER BOX. IF THAT CONTAINS AN UNDERGROUND BACKFLOW | | | ASSEMBLY IT MUST BE CONVERTED TO ABOVE-GROUND | | | INSTALLATION AND BROUGHT UP TO STANDARDS. | | | | | | -VERIFY WHERE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY FOR EXISTING WATER | | | SERVICE IS LOCATED. | | | | | | -VERIFY IF THE EXISTING WATER SERVICE AND METER IS FOR | | | 4301 UP THE GROVE OR 5950 N MILITARY TRL. DOES 4301 | | | NEED CITY WATER AND CURRENTLY USE ANY? | | | | | | -UTILITY EASEMENT MUST BE GRANTED FOR WATER SERVICE AND | | | METER BOX ON PROPERTY IF NONE CURRENTLY EXIST. | | | | | | -APPEARS SOMETHING TRIANGULAR AND LARGE IS BEING BUILT | | | ON AND AROUND THE WATER SERVICE. PLEASE ADVISE WHAT | | | THIS IS. IF THIS IS SOME KIND OF WATER RETENTION AREA, | | | WATER METER AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY WOULD HAVE TO BE | | | RELOCATED OUT OF THE AREA. STRUCTURES ALSO MAY NOT | | | ENCROACH ON WATER SERVICES AND METER BOXES. | | | | | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | CONCERNS, THANKS. | | | RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES | | | DEPARTMENT | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-09-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
09-09-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
09-09-2020 |
Time |
08:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-09-09 09:41:58 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1) IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT FOR ANY PROPOSED GATE ACCESS | | | POINTS THAT A KNOX PACLOCK BE PROVIDED FOR FD EMERGENCY | | | ACCESS. | | | | | | 2) THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES | | | NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 3). THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ANY SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
04-01-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
04-01-2021 |
Time |
10:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
04-01-2021 |
Time |
10:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-04-01 10:27:15 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: FPL DSI SUBSTATION EXPANSION Z20080005 | | | APRIL 1, 2021 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A COMPLETE TREE SURVEY THAT | | | INCLUDES ALL TREES ON THE PROPERTY AND PROVIDE A TREE | | | DISPOSITION LIST AND PLAN IDENTIFYING ALL SPECIES AND | | | WHETHER TREES WILL REMAIN, BE RELOCATED OR REMOVED. | | | INCLUDE COLUMNS FOR CONDITION RATING AND TREE CANOPY | | | DIAMETER. | | | CANOPY SPREAD IN CHART NEEDS TO BE CHANGED TO CANOPY | | | DIAMETER. THE LISTED NUMBERS APPEAR TO BE RADIUS FROM | | | THE TREE SURVEY, SO NEED TO BE DOUBLED TO CORRECTLY | | | REFLECT DIAMETER. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE | | | TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR | | | RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY | | | EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR | | | POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR | | | THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS. | | | SUPPLY ARBORIST INFORMATION ON RELOCATION POTENTIAL, AS | | | ALL TREES ARE LISTED IN GOOD CONDITION. TREES DO NOT | | | HAVE TO BE RELOCATED TO THE SAME PARCEL, THERE MAY BE | | | OTHER AREAS OF THE DSI WHERE TREES CAN BE ACCOMMODATED. | | | PER THE PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, THE REMOVAL | | | AND MITIGATION BY PAYMENT IN LIEU IS GRANTED DUE TO THE | | | NATURE OF THE USE OF THE SURROUNDING AREA AND THE | | | UTILITY RESTRICTIONS. | | | 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR ANY | | | MITIGATION DUE FOR REMOVED TREES AND PROVIDE | | | CALCULATIONS OF MITIGATION TREE CANOPY PROPOSED. | | | MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE MITIGATION | | | TABLE: | | | ? SATISFIED. CANOPY DIAMETERS LESS THAN 20 FEET ARE TO | | | SHOW THE MITIGATION DUE AS THE CATEGORY SQUARE FOOTAGE | | | ON A ONE TO ONE BASIS. CYPRESS, MAHOGANY, GREEN | | | BUTTONWOOD, LAUREL OAK AND LIVE OAK ARE ALL CATEGORY 1, | | | SO WOULD BE 300 SQUARE FEET EACH DUE. SILVER BUTTONWOOD | | | IS CATEGORY 2, SO WOULD BE 150 SQ FT EACH DUE. | | | ? SATISFIED. CANOPY DIAMETERS OF 20 FEET OR MORE MUST | | | BE CALCULATED FOR ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF CANOPY. IF | | | THEY CANNOT BE RELOCATED PER COMMENT 2, THERE APPEAR TO | | | BE 9 TREES THAT WOULD FALL IN THIS CATEGORY. | | | ? SATISFIED. TOTALS OF MITIGATION DUE NEED TO BE | | | INCLUDED ON CHART. | | | ? SATISFIED. TOTALS OF MITIGATION CREDITS NEED TO BE | | | CALCULATED BASED ON THE PLANT LIST BY CATEGORY AND | | | TOTAL PROVIDED. | | | PROPOSED OFF SITE TREES CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD | | | MITIGATION. OPTIONS ARE TO PLACE THE TREES ON THE SITE | | | OR PAYMENT IN LIEU. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN MEETING ALL THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-442 (B), INCLUDING A | | | COMPLETE PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. ADD EXISTING AND RELOCATED TREES OR PALMS | | | TO THE FINAL PLANT LIST AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE | | | REQUIRED TREES. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED TREES | | | BASED ON 40% REQUIRED OPEN SPACE AND SHOW THE TOTAL | | | TREES PROVIDED. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. INDICATE THE REQUIRED 5 FOOT PERIMETER | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFER ON THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED BUFFER | | | TREES AT ONE FOR EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR | | | EACH PROPERTY LINE SEGMENT, AND SHOW THE NUMBER | | | PROVIDED PER SECTION 94-443. A CONTINUOUS HEDGE SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED IN THE BUFFERS TO PROVIDE SCREENING. | | | INDICATE EXISTING HEDGES. | | | | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. THE DRAINAGE AREAS AS INDICATED DO NOT | | | TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE ROOT SYSTEMS OF THE | | | EXISTING TREES AT THE PERIMETER OF THE PROPERTY. DESIGN | | | SHOULD BE ADJUSTED TO AVOID DESTRUCTION OF ROOT SYSTEMS | | | AND HARM TO THE EXISTING TREES. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE 50 REQUIRED FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | POINTS BASED ON THE FINAL PLANT LIST PER SECTION | | | 94-443(G). | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. | | | PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT | | | MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED | | | ON THE PLANT LIST. | | | | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. PAYMENT IN LIEU | | | WILL BE MADE FOR 10,667 SQ FT OF TREE CANOPY | | | REPLACEMENT DUE AT THE TIME OF PERMIT ISSUANCE. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-23-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-23-2021 |
Time |
13:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-23-2021 |
Time |
13:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-23 13:32:20 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: FPL DSI SUBSTATION EXPANSION Z20080005 | | | MARCH 23, 2021 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A COMPLETE TREE SURVEY THAT | | | INCLUDES ALL TREES ON THE PROPERTY AND PROVIDE A TREE | | | DISPOSITION LIST AND PLAN IDENTIFYING ALL SPECIES AND | | | WHETHER TREES WILL REMAIN, BE RELOCATED OR REMOVED. | | | INCLUDE COLUMNS FOR CONDITION RATING AND TREE CANOPY | | | DIAMETER. | | | CANOPY SPREAD IN CHART NEEDS TO BE CHANGED TO CANOPY | | | DIAMETER. THE LISTED NUMBERS APPEAR TO BE RADIUS FROM | | | THE TREE SURVEY, SO NEED TO BE DOUBLED TO CORRECTLY | | | REFLECT DIAMETER. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE | | | TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR | | | RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY | | | EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR | | | POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR | | | THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS. | | | SUPPLY ARBORIST INFORMATION ON RELOCATION POTENTIAL, AS | | | ALL TREES ARE LISTED IN GOOD CONDITION. TREES DO NOT | | | HAVE TO BE RELOCATED TO THE SAME PARCEL, THERE MAY BE | | | OTHER AREAS OF THE DSI WHERE TREES CAN BE ACCOMMODATED. | | | PER THE PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, THE REMOVAL | | | AND MITIGATION BY PAYMENT IN LIEU IS GRANTED DUE TO THE | | | NATURE OF THE USE OF THE SURROUNDING AREA AND THE | | | UTILITY RESTRICTIONS. | | | 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR | | | ANY MITIGATION DUE FOR REMOVED TREES AND PROVIDE | | | CALCULATIONS OF MITIGATION TREE CANOPY PROPOSED. | | | MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE MITIGATION | | | TABLE: | | | ? SATISFIED. CANOPY DIAMETERS LESS THAN 20 FEET ARE TO | | | SHOW THE MITIGATION DUE AS THE CATEGORY SQUARE FOOTAGE | | | ON A ONE TO ONE BASIS. CYPRESS, MAHOGANY, GREEN | | | BUTTONWOOD, LAUREL OAK AND LIVE OAK ARE ALL CATEGORY 1, | | | SO WOULD BE 300 SQUARE FEET EACH DUE. SILVER BUTTONWOOD | | | IS CATEGORY 2, SO WOULD BE 150 SQ FT EACH DUE. | | | ? SATISFIED. CANOPY DIAMETERS OF 20 FEET OR MORE MUST | | | BE CALCULATED FOR ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF CANOPY. IF | | | THEY CANNOT BE RELOCATED PER COMMENT 2, THERE APPEAR TO | | | BE 9 TREES THAT WOULD FALL IN THIS CATEGORY. | | | ? SATISFIED. TOTALS OF MITIGATION DUE NEED TO BE | | | INCLUDED ON CHART. | | | ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. TOTALS OF MITIGATION CREDITS | | | NEED TO BE CALCULATED BASED ON THE PLANT LIST BY | | | CATEGORY AND TOTAL PROVIDED. | | | PROPOSED OFF SITE TREES CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD | | | MITIGATION. OPTIONS ARE TO PLACE THE TREES ON THE SITE | | | OR PAYMENT IN LIEU. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN MEETING ALL THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-442 (B), INCLUDING A | | | COMPLETE PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. ADD EXISTING AND RELOCATED TREES OR PALMS | | | TO THE FINAL PLANT LIST AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE | | | REQUIRED TREES. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED TREES | | | BASED ON 40% REQUIRED OPEN SPACE AND SHOW THE TOTAL | | | TREES PROVIDED. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. INDICATE THE REQUIRED 5 FOOT PERIMETER | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFER ON THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED BUFFER | | | TREES AT ONE FOR EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR | | | EACH PROPERTY LINE SEGMENT, AND SHOW THE NUMBER | | | PROVIDED PER SECTION 94-443. A CONTINUOUS HEDGE SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED IN THE BUFFERS TO PROVIDE SCREENING. | | | INDICATE EXISTING HEDGES. | | | | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. THE DRAINAGE AREAS AS INDICATED DO NOT | | | TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE ROOT SYSTEMS OF THE | | | EXISTING TREES AT THE PERIMETER OF THE PROPERTY. DESIGN | | | SHOULD BE ADJUSTED TO AVOID DESTRUCTION OF ROOT SYSTEMS | | | AND HARM TO THE EXISTING TREES. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE 50 REQUIRED FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | POINTS BASED ON THE FINAL PLANT LIST PER SECTION | | | 94-443(G). | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. | | | PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT | | | MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED | | | ON THE PLANT LIST. | | | | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-27-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
01-27-2021 |
Time |
14:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
01-27-2021 |
Time |
14:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-01-27 14:16:24 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: FPL DSI SUBSTATION EXPANSION Z20080005 | | | JANUARY 26, 2021 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A COMPLETE TREE SURVEY | | | THAT INCLUDES ALL TREES ON THE PROPERTY AND PROVIDE A | | | TREE DISPOSITION LIST AND PLAN IDENTIFYING ALL SPECIES | | | AND WHETHER TREES WILL REMAIN, BE RELOCATED OR REMOVED. | | | INCLUDE COLUMNS FOR CONDITION RATING AND TREE CANOPY | | | DIAMETER. | | | CANOPY SPREAD IN CHART NEEDS TO BE CHANGED TO CANOPY | | | DIAMETER. THE LISTED NUMBERS APPEAR TO BE RADIUS FROM | | | THE TREE SURVEY, SO NEED TO BE DOUBLED TO CORRECTLY | | | REFLECT DIAMETER. | | | | | | 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES | | | NATIVE TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE | | | OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY | | | EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR | | | POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR | | | THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS. | | | SUPPLY ARBORIST INFORMATION ON RELOCATION POTENTIAL, AS | | | ALL TREES ARE LISTED IN GOOD CONDITION. TREES DO NOT | | | HAVE TO BE RELOCATED TO THE SAME PARCEL, THERE MAY BE | | | OTHER AREAS OF THE DSI WHERE TREES CAN BE ACCOMMODATED. | | | 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR | | | ANY MITIGATION DUE FOR REMOVED TREES AND PROVIDE | | | CALCULATIONS OF MITIGATION TREE CANOPY PROPOSED. | | | MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE MITIGATION | | | TABLE: | | | ? CANOPY DIAMETERS LESS THAN 20 FEET ARE TO SHOW THE | | | MITIGATION DUE AS THE CATEGORY SQUARE FOOTAGE ON A ONE | | | TO ONE BASIS. CYPRESS, MAHOGANY, GREEN BUTTONWOOD, | | | LAUREL OAK AND LIVE OAK ARE ALL CATEGORY 1, SO WOULD BE | | | 300 SQUARE FEET EACH DUE. SILVER BUTTONWOOD IS CATEGORY | | | 2, SO WOULD BE 150 SQ FT EACH DUE. | | | ? CANOPY DIAMETERS OF 20 FEET OR MORE MUST BE | | | CALCULATED FOR ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF CANOPY. IF THEY | | | CANNOT BE RELOCATED PER COMMENT 2, THERE APPEAR TO BE 9 | | | TREES THAT WOULD FALL IN THIS CATEGORY. | | | ? TOTALS OF MITIGATION DUE NEED TO BE INCLUDED ON | | | CHART. | | | ? TOTALS OF MITIGATION CREDITS NEED TO BE CALCULATED | | | BASED ON THE PLANT LIST BY CATEGORY AND TOTAL PROVIDED. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN MEETING ALL THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-442 (B), INCLUDING A | | | COMPLETE PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. ADD EXISTING AND RELOCATED TREES OR PALMS | | | TO THE FINAL PLANT LIST AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE | | | REQUIRED TREES. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED TREES | | | BASED ON 40% REQUIRED OPEN SPACE AND SHOW THE TOTAL | | | TREES PROVIDED. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. INDICATE THE REQUIRED 5 FOOT PERIMETER | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFER ON THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED BUFFER | | | TREES AT ONE FOR EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR | | | EACH PROPERTY LINE SEGMENT, AND SHOW THE NUMBER | | | PROVIDED PER SECTION 94-443. A CONTINUOUS HEDGE SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED IN THE BUFFERS TO PROVIDE SCREENING. | | | INDICATE EXISTING HEDGES. | | | | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. THE DRAINAGE AREAS AS INDICATED DO NOT | | | TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE ROOT SYSTEMS OF THE | | | EXISTING TREES AT THE PERIMETER OF THE PROPERTY. DESIGN | | | SHOULD BE ADJUSTED TO AVOID DESTRUCTION OF ROOT SYSTEMS | | | AND HARM TO THE EXISTING TREES. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE 50 REQUIRED FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | POINTS BASED ON THE FINAL PLANT LIST PER SECTION | | | 94-443(G). | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. | | | PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT | | | MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED | | | ON THE PLANT LIST. | | | | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-08-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-08-2020 |
Time |
14:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-08-2020 |
Time |
14:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-09-08 14:25:21 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: FPL DSI SUBSTATION EXPANSION Z20080005 | | | SEPTEMBER 8, 2020 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE A COMPLETE TREE SURVEY THAT INCLUDES ALL | | | TREES ON THE PROPERTY AND PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION | | | LIST AND PLAN IDENTIFYING ALL SPECIES AND WHETHER TREES | | | WILL REMAIN, BE RELOCATED OR REMOVED. INCLUDE COLUMNS | | | FOR CONDITION RATING AND TREE CANOPY DIAMETER. | | | 2. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES IN GOOD | | | CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A | | | 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY | | | RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION. | | | PROVIDE RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND | | | PALMS. | | | 3. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR ANY MITIGATION DUE FOR | | | REMOVED TREES AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF MITIGATION | | | TREE CANOPY PROPOSED. | | | | | | 4. PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN MEETING ALL THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-442 (B), INCLUDING A | | | COMPLETE PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 5. ADD EXISTING AND RELOCATED TREES OR PALMS TO THE | | | FINAL PLANT LIST AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE REQUIRED | | | TREES. | | | | | | 6. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED TREES BASED ON 40% | | | REQUIRED OPEN SPACE AND SHOW THE TOTAL TREES PROVIDED. | | | | | | 7. INDICATE THE REQUIRED 5 FOOT PERIMETER LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFER ON THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | | | | 8. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED BUFFER TREES AT | | | ONE FOR EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR EACH | | | PROPERTY LINE SEGMENT, AND SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED PER | | | SECTION 94-443. A CONTINUOUS HEDGE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN | | | THE BUFFERS TO PROVIDE SCREENING. INDICATE EXISTING | | | HEDGES. | | | | | | | | | 9. THE DRAINAGE AREAS AS INDICATED DO NOT TAKE INTO | | | CONSIDERATION THE ROOT SYSTEMS OF THE EXISTING TREES AT | | | THE PERIMETER OF THE PROPERTY. DESIGN SHOULD BE | | | ADJUSTED TO AVOID DESTRUCTION OF ROOT SYSTEMS AND HARM | | | TO THE EXISTING TREES. | | | | | | 10. PROVIDE THE 50 REQUIRED FLORIDA FRIENDLY POINTS | | | BASED ON THE FINAL PLANT LIST PER SECTION 94-443(G). | | | | | | 11. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT | | | SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL | | | ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT | | | SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF | | | SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA | | | WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA | | | LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED ON THE | | | PLANT LIST. | | | | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-08-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
09-08-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
09-08-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-09-08 17:09:34 | NO COMMENTS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-26-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
01-26-2021 |
Time |
11:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
01-26-2021 |
Time |
11:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-01-26 11:55:21 | COMMENTS ON THE 1-15-2021 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE: | | | | | | 1. CONSIDER SWITCHING GENERAL NOTES #4 AND #9 ON SHEET | | | E-GMY01J (JURISDICTIONAL SITE PLAN) SO THAT NOTE #9 | | | WILL REFER TO THE FENCE INSTEAD OF THE FLOOD ZONE. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 (O) | | | 561-351-0510 (M) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-10-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
09-10-2020 |
Time |
16:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
09-10-2020 |
Time |
16:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-09-10 16:58:11 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. ON THE CIVIL PLANS, LIST THE VERTICAL DATUM ON EVERY | | | SHEET THAT HAS ELEVATION DATA AND INCLUDE THE | | | CONVERSTION EQUATION BETWEEN NAVD1988 AND NGVD1929. | | | | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | | | | 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED | | | WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 3.. PROVIDE SFWMD ERP PERMIT MODIFICATION. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 (O) | | | 561-351-0510 (M) | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-08-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
09-08-2020 |
Time |
11:24 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-09-08 11:24:45 | NO COMMENTS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-19-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
01-27-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-01-27 09:39:18 | TRAFFIC ENGINEERING | | | | | | NO FURTHER COMMENTS | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-10-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
09-10-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-09-10 12:59:05 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1) INSTALL STOP SIGN AND STOP BAR AT THE DRIVEWAY | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-12-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
03-12-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
03-12-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-12 11:19:43 | PER DISCUSSIONS WITH AVANN, P&Z ADMINISTRATOR, THE | | | PROPOSED USE OF 6 STRANDS OF BARBED WIRE ON V ARMS IS | | | PERMITTED FOR THE PROJECT, AS IT IS CURRENTLY EXISTING | | | WITHIN OTHER AREAS OF THE FPL SITE AND IT IS NECESSARY | | | FOR SAFETY, PROVIDED THAT THE ARMS DO NOT EXTEND BEYOND | | | THE PROPERTY LINES. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-20-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
01-20-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
01-20-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-01-20 10:47:41 | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) NO MORE THAN THREE STRANDS OF BARBED WIRE MAY BE | | | USED AT THE TOP OF A FENCE/WALL. THE STRANDS MUST BE | | | LOCATED AT LEAST 6 FT. ABOVE GRADE OR MOUNTED | | | VERTICALLY OR AT AN ANGLE PROJECTING INTERIOR TO THE | | | PROPERTY AND MUST NOT ENCROACH BEYOND THE PROPERTY | | | LINE. ACCORDING TO A NOTE IN THE PLANS, THERE WILL BE | | | SIX STRANDS OF BARBED WIRE, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED. | | | ALSO, PROVIDE A DETAIL TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS FOR A BARBED WIRE FENCE. [ZLDR S. | | | 94-302(C)(2)] | | | | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | * PLEASE PROVIDE YOUR RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE | | | (3) PAPER COPIES, ONE REDUCED COPY IN 11 INCHES X 17 | | | INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND | | | DOCUMENTS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY | | | RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE NOT TO BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE | | | ($60.00). | | | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE | | | QUESTIONS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-08-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
09-08-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
09-08-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-09-08 10:56:25 | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) WHAT IS THE SETBACK DISTANCE FROM THE EDGE OF THE | | | EXTENDED YARD AREA TO THE PROPERTY LINE(S)? PLEASE | | | PROVIDE THE DIMENSION(S) IN THE PLAN. | | | | | | 2.) WHAT IS THE HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED 5-LF FIBERGLASS | | | ISOLATION FENCE, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE | | | EXTENDED YARD? PLEASE PROVIDE THE HEIGHT INFORMATION IN | | | THE PLAN. | | | | | | 3.) PLEASE LABEL ALL EXISTING/PROPOSED DRY/WET | | | DETENTION AREAS IN THE SITE PLAN | | | | | | 4.) A CONTINUOUS 5 FT. WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE | | | ENTIRE PERIMETER OF THE PROPERTY IS REQUIRED. [ZLDR | | | S.94-443, TABLE XIV-1] | | | | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE | | | (3) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 11 INCHES X | | | 17 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY | | | RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE | | | ($60). | | | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE | | | QUESTIONS. | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |