Plan Review Details - Project Z20070016
Plan Review Stops For Project Z20070016
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status P Date 03-02-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 03-02-2021 Time 19:16 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 03-02-2021 Time 19:16 Sent To  
Notes
2021-03-02 19:18:00DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AN ASBESTOS
 SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT
 REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH
 COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963,
 OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 3. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 4. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE
 REQUIRED IF THERE IS A FOOD SERVICE ESTABLISHMENT IN
 THE PROPOSED STORE. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED
 TYPE, SIZE AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT TIM LARGE,
 CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT, AT (561) 805-6692, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 5. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS,
 FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS,
 GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE,
 SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 6. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
 WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
 HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
 OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
 CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 7. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
 TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE
 ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-09-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 12-09-2020 Time 21:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 12-09-2020 Time 21:02 Sent To  
Notes
2020-12-09 21:17:24DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AN ASBESTOS
 SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT
 REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH
 COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963,
 OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 3. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM BRANDSMART TO THE PROPOSED BJS
 WAREHOUSE. SITE PLAN SHEET C101.0. SHOW AT LEAST ONE
 ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, COMPLYING WITH SECTIONS 206.2 AND
 402.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, CONNECTING
 ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR FACILITY ENTRANCES WITH ALL
 ACCESSIBLE SPACES AND ELEMENTS WITHIN THE BUILDING OR
 FACILITY
  
 4. PROPOSED NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES AT
 BRANDSMART STORE . SITE PLAN SHEET C101.0. THE PROPOSED
 CHANGES IN THE PARKING FOR THE BRANDSMART STORE WOULD
 RESULT IN INSUFFICIENT ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THERE
 ARE 421 TOTAL PARKING SPACES PROPOSED SO 9 ACCESSIBLE
 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED. ONLY 8 ACCESSIBLE PARKING
 SPACES ARE PROPOSED. THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE
 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 SECTION 208.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE.
  
 5. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 6. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE
 REQUIRED IF THERE IS A FOOD SERVICE ESTABLISHMENT IN
 THE PROPOSED STORE. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED
 TYPE, SIZE AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT TIM LARGE,
 CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT, AT (561) 805-6692, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 7. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS,
 FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS,
 GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE,
 SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 8. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
 WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
 HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE LOCATION
 OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. FOR STREET ADDRESSING,
 CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 805 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 9. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
 TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE
 ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 4 Status P Date 06-21-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 06-21-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 06-21-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 3 Status F Date 05-25-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 05-25-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 05-25-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-29 09:56:51THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD
 CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES,
 PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]:
 FOLLOWUPS TO RESPONSES:
  
 12. IF FIRELINE PIPING IS GOING TO RUN THROUGH
 POND/LAKE, THEN BOTH CONTAINMENT FIRELINE BACKFLOW
 ASSEMBLIES WOULD NEED TO BE UPGRADED TO RPDA TYPES.
  
 PAGE 9 KIMLEY-HORN.COM 1615 SOUTH CONGRESS AVENUE,
 SUITE 201, DELRAY BEACH, FL 33445 561 330 2345
 RESPONSE: FIRELINE PIPES RUNNING UNDER DRY DETENTION
 AREA HAVE BEEN REVISED TO BE RPDA TYPE, REFER TO SHEET
 C501.0.
  
 -DURING SITE MEETING, ENGINEER VERIFIED NO INCREASED
 HAZARD DUE TO LINER. I BELIEVE THE INTENTION WAS TO
 KEEP USING BOTH EXISTING FIRELINE DDCV IF THEY ARE NOT
 BEING RELOCATED.
  
 NEW COMMENTS AS FOLLOWS:
  
 -THERE MAY BE LANDSCAPING CONFLICTS WITH UTILITIES BUT
 CANNOT TELL FOR SURE BECAUSE LANDSCAPING PLAN DOES NOT
 SHOW UTILITIES ON IT. PLEASE SUBMIT SEPARATE PLAN SHEET
 WITH LANDSCAPING OVERLAID ON UTILITIES SO CAN VERIFY
 BETTER.
  
 -PRIOR ASKED ABOUT IRRIGATION AND RESPONSE REFERENCED
 IRRIGATION PLAN. CANNOT FIND THE IRRIGATION PLAN ?
 PLEASE SUBMIT IT.
  
 -CIVIL PLANS HAD DUPLICATE STANDARD DETAILS INCLUDE FOR
 SMALL BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY. PLEASE REMOVE ONE OF THE THEM.
  
 -IS EXISTING PRIVATE LIFT STATION SUFFICIENT FOR
 ADDITION OF BJ?S?
  
 -GREASETRAP FOR BRANDSMART LOOKS LIKE IT IS LOCATED IN
 THE ROAD. DID NOT KNOW IF THAT WOULD COMPLICATE
 MAINTENANCE. IS LOCATION ACCEPTABLE?
  
 -COULD ONLY FIND A SEWER LATERAL FOR BRANDSMART GOING
 TO A GREASETRAP. IF THERE IS ANOTHER ONE, PLEASE SHOW
 AND LABEL IT ON SEWER PLAN.
  
 -LABEL BOTH FPL STATIONS ON THE WATER PLAN. IF THERE
 ARE ANY EASEMENTS FOR THE FPL STATIONS, THEN SHOW AND
 LABEL THOSE ALSO.
  
 -SHOW AND LABEL PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGNS ON THE WATER
 PLANS. (THEY ARE SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN FOR REFERENCE).
  
 -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL: SHOW AND LABEL
 EXISTING FIRELINE AROUND SOUTHERN AND WESTERN PORTIONS
 OF BRANDSMART ALL THE WATER TO THE WATER MAIN ? (SOME
 PORTIONS ARE MISSING), SHOW BETTER ON INSET B THE
 CONNECTION FROM NEW 4 INCH PIPE TO 2.5 INCH BACKFLOW
 ASSEMBLIES.
  
 -MAKE SURE WATER PLAN DOMESTIC BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY
 INFORMATION NEAR NE ROW MATCHES INSET A. SHOULD NOT BE
 DDCV OR RPDA ? SHOULD BE RP TYPE. BELIEVE THOSE WERE
 PROPOSED TO BE REPLACED.
  
 -SAN SEWER MH NORTHEAST OF MH NO.1 IS NOT LABELED WITH
 ELEVATION INFO.
  
 -PIPE SIZING FOR FIRE HYDRANT ON INSET B DOES NOT SEEM
 TO MATCH CROSSING INFORMATION AND PLAN SIZING.
  
 -DEMOLITION PLAN IS AMBIGUOUS ON HOW THE WATER PIPING
 WILL BE DEMOLISHED. FOR INSTANCE THE EXISTING 10 WATER
 PIPE. PLEASE INCLUDE MORE DETAIL ON THE PLAN THE METHOD
 OF DEMOLITION.
 -ON DEMO PLAN ADD PIPE MATERIAL TYPE TO LABEL FOR
 EXISTING 10 WATER PIPE THAT IS TO BE DEMOLISHED.
  
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 03-03-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 03-03-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 03-03-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-03-03 10:28:33THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD
 CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES,
 PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]:
 -NEAR THE NORTHWEST ENTRANCE ON THE WATER PLAN THERE
 SHOWS A PROPOSED EASEMENT. WHAT TYPE IS IT?
  
 -THERE SHOWS PROPOSED GREASE TRAP, SEWER MANHOLE, SEWER
 PIPING, AND FORCE MAIN PIPING IN POND/LAKE. IS THAT A
 CONFLICT FOR MAINTENANCE, CONTAMINATION, AND
 INFILTRATION?
  
 -PLEASE DRAW ARROWS ON FORCE MAIN SHOWING DIRECTION OF
 FLOW.
  
 -WILL THE TWO VAULT METERS BE CONNECTED WITH PIPING TO
 FORM A LOOPED SYSTEM?
  
 -IF DOMESTIC VAULT METER IS RELOCATED, IT NEEDS TO
 CHANGE TO ABOVE-GROUND INSTALLATION WITHOUT A VAULT AND
 LABELED ABOVE-GROUND.
  
 -IF THE EXISTING DOMESTIC BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ARE NOT
 LEAD-FREE COMPLIANT, RECOMMEND REPLACING THEM.
  
 -CONSIDER DUAL/PARALLEL BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ON DOMESTIC
 WATER SERVICES TO REDUCE WATER OUTAGES DURING BACKFLOW
 ASSEMBLY MAINTENANCE.
  
 -PROPOSED 2INCH BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY LOOKS TO BE IN
 CONFLICT LOCATION WITH EXISTING ELECTRIC UTILITY.
 PLEASE RELOCATE SLIGHTLY SOUTHWEST.
  
 -WILL THE NORTHWEST VAULT METER ONLY FEED THE DUAL
 2.5INCH RPZ FOR BRANDSMART?
  
 -ON WHICH SHEET WAS THE NOTE ADDED THAT LEAKING
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES NEED TO BE REPAIRED?
  
 -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL: LABEL THE SIZE OF
 THE PROPOSED RPZ FOR NEW 2INCH METER, LABEL THE WATER
 MAIN PIPE MATERIAL TYPE ON EXECUTIVE. LABEL THE
 FIRELINE POINT OF SERVICE VALVES UPSTREAM OF THE
 FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES, SHOW AND LABEL THE
 FIRELINE WATER SERVICE PIPING FROM THE WATER MAIN WITH
 PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL TYPE, SHOWS ALL WATER MAIN GATE
 VALVES ON EXECUTIVE.
  
 -IF FIRELINE PIPING IS GOING TO RUN THROUGH POND/LAKE,
 THEN BOTH CONTAINMENT FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES
 WOULD NEED TO BE UPGRADED TO RPDA TYPES.
  
 -VERIFY BOTH FIRELINE WATER SERVICE PIPES WILL BE
 CONNECTED TO FORM A LOOP SYSTEM.
  
 -SOME TREES APPEAR TO BE CLOSE TO THE CONTAINMENT
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES. VERIFY TREE ROOTS WILL NOT IMPACT
 PROPERTY OWNER?S WATER PIPING AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES.
  
 -WILL NEW DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE PIPE FOR BJ THAT RUNS
 THROUGH POND/LAKE PRESENT A MAINTENANCE PROBLEM FOR
 PROPERTY OWNER?
  
 -IF THE FIRELINE UTILITY BILLING ACCOUNT HOLDER HAD
 NONPAYMENT OR BACKFLOW COMPLIANCE ISSUES THAT RESULTED
 IN THE FIRELINE WATER SERVICES BEING SHUT OFF, THEN
 BOTH BUSINESSES WOULD BE AFFECTED.
  
 -THE EXISTING FIRELINE CONTAINMENT BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES
 ARE SHOWN AS 8INCHES, BUT A 10INCH ISOLATION DCDA FOR
 BJ IS PROPOSED IN ADDITION TO EXISTING 8INCH ISOLATION
 DCDA FOR BRANDSMART. IS THAT ACCEPTABLE?
  
 -IS THE EXISTING 1INCH WATER SERVICE LINE SUFFICIENT
 FOR BOTH THE GAS STATION AND LIFT STATION?
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-01-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 12-01-2020 Time   Rev Time  
Received By rrossano Date 12-01-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-12-03 08:47:091. THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF
 REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY
 AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND
 WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. TO VIEW
 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER
 ENGINEERING RELATED DOCUMENTS, OPEN A BROWSER IN CHROME
 AND GO TO: WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGDOCS . TO LOGIN, UNDER
 ?EMAIL? ENTER [email protected] ; UNDER ?PASSWORD? ENTER
 SIMPLE321#
 THERE ARE 4 PAGES OF AVAILABLE ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS
 FOR YOUR USE.
 2. CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH,
 FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08, ADOPTED
 SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18) CHAPTER 90
 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. SEC. 90-7.
 POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER SERVICE
 FACILITIES OF THE CITY:
 THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
 BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
 BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
 3. AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
 MORE INFORMATION, OPEN A BROWSER IN CHROME AND GO TO:
 WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGDOCS .TO LOGIN, UNDER ?EMAIL? ENTER
 [email protected] ; UNDER ?PASSWORD? ENTER SIMPLE321#
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL IS ON PAGE 4.
 4. PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC
 RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF
 YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
 MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
 IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
 [email protected] OR 561-494-1040 FOR FURTHER
 ASSISTANCE.
 5. PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS
 OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES,
 INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND
 SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES,
 METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE
 SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING
 GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS,
 ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL
 INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER
 LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN
 VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
 PLEASE SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT
 MATERIAL. ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL
 EXISTING AND PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT,
 INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &
 TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL
 UTILITY CROSSINGS.
 6. CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY
 ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
 ROW.
 7. PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE
 DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB
 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION).
 8. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM
 AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE
 PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER.
 9. SHOW VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION INFORMATION
 (NAVD 88 AND NGVD 29).
 10. PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND
 STORMWATER ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE.
 11. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND
 IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED
 AREAS.
 12. PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
 PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
 13. PLEASE LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE
 APPLICABLE.
 14. PLEASE PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED
 LOCATION OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION.
 15. COORDINATE WITH MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE
 SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING
 PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT
 HIM AT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]
 16. PROVIDE DEDICATED UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS
 FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD
 CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES,
 PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]:
  
 -ALL CURRENT WATER SERVICES AROUND BRANDSMART AT
 EXECUTIVE CENTER HAVE UTILITY BILLS IN BRANDSMART?S
 NAME AND ON SITE PIPING LOOKS TO BE OWNED BY THEM. THE
 PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES AND WATER USAGE IS PRECARIOUS
 BECAUSE PRIVATELY-OWNED PIPING IS CROSSING PROPERTY
 LINES, AND WATER USE IN SOME INSTANCES APPEARS TO BE
 COMING FROM METERED WATER SERVICES THE USER WOULD NOT
 PAY FOR. TO PREVENT PRACTICAL AND LEGAL CONFUSION AND
 PROBLEMS IN THE FUTURE, RECOMMEND WATER SERVICES AND
 PIPING TO BE DESIGNED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PROPERTY
 LINES, SUCH THAT THE PIPING AND WATER USAGE IS
 CONTAINED TO EACH PROPERTY.
 -REMOVAL OF EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTS WOULD REQUIRE THE
 APPROVAL OF CITY WPB FIRE MARSHAL.
 -THERE ARE SEVERAL FIRE HYDRANTS ON THE WATER PLANS
 THAT DO NOT HAVE NOTES ON WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THEM.
 PLEASE ADD LABELING IF THEY ARE REMAINING OR BEING
 REMOVED.
 -C501.0 APPEARS TO BE MISSING THE EXISTING DOMESTIC
 VAULT WATER SERVICE. PLEASE ADD TO PLAN AND LABEL.
 -C501.1 APPEARS TO BE MISSING A LARGE DOMESTIC WATER
 SERVICE. PLEASE ADD TO PLAN AND LABEL.
 -LABEL PRIVATE FIRELINES. NOTE THAT FIRELINES MAY ONLY
 BE USED FOR FIREFIGHTING PURPOSES AND CANNOT BE TAPPED
 FOR THINGS LIKE HOSE BIBS. VERIFY THAT NOT HAPPENING
 WITH AREA AROUND PROPOSED GAS STATION.
 -ON SHEET C501.0, PROPOSED METER IS IN SIDEWALK. CANNOT
 INSTALL METER IN SIDEWALK. RELOCATE TO GRASS AREA AND
 ADD UTILITY EASEMENT IF ON PRIVATE PROPERTY.
 -ADD NOTE TO PLAN TO COORDINATE WATER UTILITY WORK SUCH
 THAT DOWNTIME/OUTAGES OF WATER SERVICES AND FIRELINES
 ARE MINIMIZED.
 -ADD NOTE TO PLAN TO NOTIFY WPB FIRE DEPARTMENT IF ANY
 FIRELINE OR FIRE HYDRANT IS RENDERED NONFUNCTIONAL OR
 TAKEN OUT OF SERVICE TEMPORARILY.
 -CANNOT DISTINGUISH WATER SERVICES AT CITY POINT OF
 SERVICE. ADD SEPARATE DETAILED BLOWUP PLANS SHOWING THE
 AREAS AROUND THE WATER METERS AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES.
 -APPEARS SOME BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES AND WATER SERVICES
 ARE MISSING FROM WATER PLANS. PLEASE ADD AND LABEL.
 -SEVERAL EXISTING BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ON SITE ARE
 LEAKING AND NEED REPAIR. ADD NOTE TO PLAN THAT ANY
 LEAKING BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES NEED TO BE REPAIRED OR
 REPLACED BY PROJECT COMPLETION.
 -ADD WATER DEMAND CALCULATIONS TO WATER PLANS.
 -WATER SERVICE STANDARD DETAILS ARE OLD REVISION. NEED
 UPDATE TO NEWEST REVISION FOR ANY THAT WILL BE USED.
 NEED INCLUDE WATER SERVICE STANDARD DETAILS FOR SMALL
 WATER SERVICE AND SMALL BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY.
 -PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE FOR GAS STATION IS NOT
 CONNECTING TO BJ?S MAIN PROPERTY. THIS COULD BE
 PROBLEMATIC IF BRANDSMART DOES NOT ALLOW ACCESS OR
 BUILDS SOMETHING THAT WOULD CUT OFF ACCESS.
 -PLEASE VERIFY IF BJ?S WILL HAVE FIRE SPRINKLERS INSIDE
 BUILDING.
 -DID NOT SEE SEPARATE METERED IRRIGATION WATER SERVICE
 FOR BJ?S. WILL ONE BE NEEDED?
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 12-07-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 12-07-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 12-02-2020 Time 14:44 Sent To  
Notes
2020-12-07 14:46:52THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE
 OCCUPANCY TYPE, PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE.
  
 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE
 LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER
 SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED.
  
 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 THE PROPOSED LOCATIONS OF THE FIRE HYDRANT AND FDC ARE
 ACCEPTABLE WITH ANY CHANGES CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH
 THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER
 THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY
 ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM,
 ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FS 61G AND
 SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PERMIT.
  
 9A) THE LOCATION OF ANY APPLICABLE DDCV AND FIRE LINE
 LOCATIONS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND
 SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL,
 THE CITY'S ENGINEERS OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND
 THE CITY'S PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE.
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
 EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
 PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
 SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE
 SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY
 DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 12. PLEASE PROVIDE FOR TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATION
 COVERAGE PER NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES;
 11.10 TWO-WAY RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES; 11.10.1 IN
 ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL
 STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE
 MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.
  
 13.THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES
 NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 14. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 5 Status P Date 07-16-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By aburnett Date 07-16-2021 Time 16:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aburnett Date 07-16-2021 Time 16:46 Sent To  
Notes
2021-07-16 16:48:03FROM: ANDREW BURNETT, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: BJ?S AT BRANDSMART CPD Z20070016
 JULY 16, 2021
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. DESIGN GUIDELINES:
 ? THE EXCEPTION TO THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER FOR WATER
 BODIES OR I-95 IS NOT SUPPORTED BY STAFF. THE PERIMETER
 OF THE BRANDSMART PD MUST HAVE THE REQUIRED BUFFER AS
 STATED.
 ? BUFFERS MAY BE ADJUSTED TO AVOID UTILITY EASEMENT
 OVERLAP THAT WOULD PREVENT THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING
 FROM BEING ALLOWED. THIS IS REINFORCED BY THE EASEMENT
 REQUIREMENT NOT BEING ALLOWED TO COUNT TOWARD BUFFER
 REQUIREMENT.
 ? ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS MUST MEET ALL THE REQUIREMENTS
 OF ARTICLE XIV ?LANDSCAPING, LAND CLEARING, TREE
 PROTECTION AND ARTIFICIAL TURF?.
 ? ALL BUILDINGS MODIFIED OR ADDED MUST MEET THE 30
 PERCENT LINEAR FOOTAGE REQUIREMENT FOR FOUNDATION
 LANDSCAPING.
 THE DESIGN GUIDELINES ARE NO LONGER NEEDED FOR
 LANDSCAPE ITEMS. NOW THAT THE SUBDIVISION REQUEST ONLY
 CREATES 2 LOTS, CODE REQUIREMENTS CAN BE MET, OR A
 WAIVER REQUESTED.
  
 2. WAIVER REQUESTS.
 ? SATISFIED. #1 SHOULD READ: PROPOSED -WAIVE THE FIVE
 FOOT BUFFER REQUIREMENT FOR INTERIOR LOT LINES.
 ? SATISFIED. #5 UP TO18 PARKING SPACES IN A ROW FOR
 NEW PARKING AREAS WOULD HAVE TO PROVIDE TREE CANOPY IN
 SOME OTHER WAY TO MEET THE INTENT OF 94-443(C). OPTIONS
 ARE CURRENTLY AVAILABLE IN THE CODE TO ALLOW UP TO 12
 SPACES IN A ROW BY EXPANDING THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS.
 THERE IS ALSO AN OPTION TO ELIMINATE PERIMETER
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS BY PROVIDING ALTERNATIVE AREAS FOR
 TREE CANOPY.
 THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLAN HAVE BEEN RECONFIGURED AND
 THE 18 SPACES IS NOT APPLICABLE.
  
  
 3. NO LONGER APPLICABLE. A WAIVER FOR SECTION 94-243,
 TABLE VII-3 COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS REGULATIONS REGARDING
 OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS WOULD HAVE TO BE INCLUDED IF
 40% OPEN SPACE MINIMUM ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS IS NOT MET AS
 THEY ARE DEVELOPED, AS THE MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE AREA IS
 60%. OPEN SPACE BY CODE DEFINITION INCLUDES ALL AREAS
 THAT ARE UNENCLOSED. THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPING IS 15%,
 AND EACH LOT SHOULD BE ABLE TO MEET THIS REQUIREMENT.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWING
 EXISTING AND PROPOSED LANDSCAPE FOR THE LINEAR PARK
 AREA. THE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS ARE TO BE UPGRADES FOR
 THE EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO JUSTIFY REDUCTIONS IN
 LANDSCAPE IN OTHER AREAS, SO THIS NEEDS TO BE
 QUANTIFIED. THE ACTUAL AREA IS PROPOSED TO BE REDUCED
 BY THE ADDITION OF PARKING.
  
 THE DESIGN PROVIDES LITTLE AREA FOR ACTUAL USE BY
 PEOPLE AND THE BAHIA SOD IN THE DRAINAGE AREA DOES NOT
 OFFER ANYTHING DIFFERENT FROM THE STANDARD DESIGN.
 STAFF SUGGESTS ENHANCED PLANTINGS TO MEET THE INTENTION
 OF THE BIOSWALE PROVIDING VISUAL INTEREST AND HABITAT
 CREATION WITH WALKWAYS TO ALLOW ACCESS AND VIEWING OF
 THE ENHANCED AREA. PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE
 COMPARISON FOR TREE CANOPY CURRENTLY EXISTING AND THE
 PROPOSED TREE CANOPY COVERAGE.
 THE LANDSCAPING IN THE ADJACENT RIGHT OF WAY MUST BE
 SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND ENHANCED TO PROVIDE A
 CONTINUOUS DESIGN FOR THE AREA. SECTION 94-452 ROADWAY
 BEAUTIFICATION APPLIES IN THIS CASE TO THE PD SO THE
 LANDSCAPE SHOULD BE DESIGNED, INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED
 BY THE PROPERTY OWNER AS PART OF THE ENHANCED AREA.
  
  
 5. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443 (C)(3)A. REQUIRES A
 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND AND REQUIRED TREE FOR EACH
 ROW OF PARKING. (3)B. REQUIRES AN INTERIOR LANDSCAPE
 ISLAND WITH A REQUIRED TREE SO THERE ARE NO MORE THAN
 10 SPACES IN A ROW. ALL THESE LANDSCAPE AREAS MUST MEET
 THE MINIMUM WIDTH OF 8 FEET OF LANDSCAPE AREA AND BE
 THE FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT SPACE. (3) C. REQUIRES
 DIVIDER MEDIANS WHERE THERE ARE MORE THAN 3 CONSECUTIVE
 ROWS OF PARKING. ALL RECONSTRUCTED AREAS OF PARKING
 MUST MEET THESE REQUIREMENTS, AND THE APPROVED PLAN
 FOLLOWED FOR UNALTERED AREAS.
 ALL AREAS OF PARKING ARE BEING RECONSTRUCTED SO PARKING
 LOT LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS APPLY TO ALL AREAS. THE
 DIVIDER MEDIANS MUST BE PROVIDED IF MORE THAN 3
 CONSECUTIVE ROWS OF PARKING. IF CHOOSING TO USE
 94-443(C)(6) B., THE INTERIOR ISLAND MUST BE SPLIT AND
 ALTERNATED. NO ADDITIONAL TREE CANOPY HAS BEEN
 PROVIDED.
 THERE IS ONE LANDSCAPE ISLAND IN THE PARKING AREA SOUTH
 OF BRANDSMART BUILDING THAT DOES NOT HAVE 2 TREES FOR
 THE 2 ROWS OF PARKING.
 PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR ALL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AS THERE
 APPEAR TO BE ONES IN THE EASTERN PARKING AREA THAT DO
 NOT MEET THE MINIMUM WIDTH FOR THE FULL LENGTH OF THE
 PARKING SPACE. NORTH EAST 4 L SHAPED LANDSCAPE ISLANDS.
 6/3/21
  
 6. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A
 MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO
 BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING
 AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE
 PERCENTAGE OF CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR THE
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS AS REQUIRED BY SECTION
 94-443(C)(3) FOR DIVIDER ISLANDS, TERMINAL, AND
 INTERIOR ISLANDS.
 PROVIDE A LISTING OF THE TREES PROVIDED IN THE INTERIOR
 PARKING ISLANDS BY SPECIES AND COUNT AND SHOW
 PERCENTAGE CALCULATED.
  
 7. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING
 LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS. PROVIDE
 THE TOTAL REQUIRED AND PROVIDED AS ONE TOTAL FOR BOTH
 SECTIONS. A SEPARATE EXHIBIT MUST BE PROVIDED TO
 DEMONSTRATE THE AREAS COUNTED.
 THERE SHOULD BE 3 AREAS SHOWN WITH DIFFERENT SHADING OR
 GRAPHIC. PARKING SPACES, OTHER VEHICULAR USE AREAS AND
 INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREAS NEED TO BE IDENTIFIED AND
 QUANTIFIED. SECTION 94-443 (C)FIGURE XIV-1 SHOULD BE
 USED TO DISCERN INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREAS. THERE ARE
 ALSO SOME AREAS SHOWN ACROSS PARCEL LINES ON THE SHEETS
 L-211 AND L-212.
  
  
 8. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO TREE
 DISPOSITION CHART SHEET L-101:
 ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE A COMPLETE TREE SURVEY THAT
 INCLUDES ALL EXISTING TREES AND PALMS. COMPLETE ALL
 COLUMNS FOR MISSING INFORMATION.
 ? SATISFIED. LIST OFF SITE TREES AND PALMS AS OFF SITE.
 THESE WOULD REQUIRE A SEPARATE PERMIT FROM THE OWNER OF
 THAT PROPERTY FOR REMOVAL.
 ? SATISFIED. IF CANOPY DIAMETERS ARE 20 FEET OR MORE,
 CALCULATE THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE AND ENTER INTO THE
 MITIGATION DUE COLUMN IF PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL. IF UNDER
 20 FEET, THE SQUARE FOOTAGE IS BASED ON THE CATEGORY
 FOR THE TREE.
  
 ? SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN AND LIST THE CATEGORY 1, 2,
 3, OR 4 FOR EACH TREE AND PALM FROM THE CITY REFERENCE
 LIST.
  
 ? SATISFIED. REMOVE ?UNIDENTIFIED PALM? AND LIST THE
 SCIENTIFIC AND COMMON NAME, AS ALL TREES MUST BE
 PROPERLY IDENTIFIED.
 ? SATISFIED. CHANGE CANOPY AREA COLUMN TO CANOPY
 MITIGATION DUE, AND LIST SQUARE FOOTAGE IF MITIGATION
 IS DUE.
 ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF
 MITIGATION DUE AND SHOW MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE
 PROVIDED FROM THE PROPOSED TREE LIST AFTER ALL
 CORRECTIONS.
  
 ? SATISFIED. INCLUDE A LIST OF ALL SPECIES AND
 QUANTITIES COUNTED TOWARD MITIGATION BASED ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN, NOT INCLUDING REPLACEMENTS FOR MISSING
 APPROVED TREES AND PALMS.
  
  
 9. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
 EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
 POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE CONDITION FOR ALL EXISTING
 TREES AND PALMS AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE
 TREES AND PALMS BASED ON A CERTIFIED ARBORISTS REPORT.
 THE FOLLOWING SABAL PALMS AND ROYAL PALMS ARE LISTED IN
 GOOD CONDITION ON THE ARBORIST REPORT YET ARE LISTED
 FOR REMOVAL. PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION. SABAL PALM NUMBER:
 43, 44, 45, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236,
 237, 238, 239, 240, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248,
 249, 250, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 264
 ROYAL PALM NUMBER: 146, 149, 151, 175, 176, 177, 193,
 195, 197, 201, 202, 218,219
  
  
 10. SATISFIED. BUFFER LENGTHS REQUIRE ONE TREE PER 30
 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR EACH BUFFER LENGTH. PROVIDE
 THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED BUFFER TREES IN A CHART WITH
 THE INDIVIDUAL BUFFER SECTIONS IDENTIFIED.
 PROVIDE THE BUFFER SECTIONS AND THE REQUIRED AND
 PROVIDED TREES FOR EACH SECTION FOR BOTH PARCELS. THERE
 WILL BE FOUR SECTIONS FOR EACH PARCEL WITH THE INTERIOR
 LOT LINES INDICATED AS NOT PROVIDED PER THE WAIVER
 REQUEST. SECTIONS CANNOT BE COMBINED.
  
 NOTE WITH LABEL REFERENCING SECTION 94-443(B)2 DOES NOT
 APPLY, AS THERE IS NO VEHICLE INGRESS OR EGRESS AT THE
 LOCATIONS ALONG I 95.
 EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEMENT ALONG WESTERN BUFFER MAY BE
 ABANDONED BY THE CITY IF NOT NEEDED, SO THIS AREA NEEDS
 TO COMPLY WITH THE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AND BE
 COORDINATED WITH THE ADJOINING PROPERTY AND THE CITY.
  
 11. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE FOUNDATION PLANTING
 CALCULATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR EACH BUILDING.
  
 12. SATISFIED. REQUIRED TREES PER OPEN SPACE ARE NOT
 PROVIDED, THIS WOULD REQUIRE A WAIVER.
 THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE CALCULATION SHOULD BE 40
 PERCENT OF THE TOTAL PARCEL SQUARE FOOTAGE. CORRECT FOR
 EACH LOT AND RECALCULATE REQUIRED TREES, FLOWERING
 TREES AND SHRUBS.
  
 13. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF
 SUBSTITUTION OF PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES. SECTION
 94-442(D) REQUIRES A 3:1 RATIO FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR
 PALMS EXCEPT THE LISTED 1:1 SPECIES.
 COULD NOT LOCATE ON PLANS.
  
 14. SATISFIED. ADD A SECTION IN THE LANDSCAPE DATA
 CHART TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A
 MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE
 FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED
 FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST
 RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT
 DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE
 THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT
 PLANTS BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST.
 COULD NOT LOCATE ON PLANS.
  
  
 15. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING
 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND REDESIGN THE LOCATIONS OF THE
 LIGHTING ON SHORTER POLES TO RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH
 TREES IN THE PARKING AREA LANDSCAPE ISLANDS.
  
 16. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 VALVES AND EQUIPMENT.
 ALL THE LOCATIONS NEED TO BE IDENTIFIED IN SOME WAY.
  
 17. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH
 LANDSCAPING. EXISTING UTILITIES CLOSE TO FUEL STATION
 DO NOT APPEAR TO HAVE LANDSCAPE SCREEN 6/2/21
 ALL THE LOCATIONS NEED TO BE IDENTIFIED IN SOME WAY.
  
 18. SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN TO THE PLANT LIST FOR
 DROUGHT TOLERANT LEVELS OF EACH SPECIES.
  
 ADD A COLUMN INSTEAD OF ADDING THE INFORMATION UNDER
 THE PLANT NAME.
  
 19. SATISFIED. MINIMUM TREE SIZES ARE 12 FEET HEIGHT,
 CORRECT ON PLANT LIST.
  
 SILVER BUTTONWOOD TREES ARE REQUIRED AT 12 FEET HEIGHT.
 TREES ARE PROHIBITED FROM BEING TRIMMED INTO SHAPES AND
 MUST BE ALLOWED TO DEVELOP INTO THEIR MATURE SIZE TO
 FULFILL THE CODE REQUIREMENTS. PROVIDE REASON FOR
 SMALLER SIZES AND SPECIES BEING USED IN BUFFERS AND
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS.
  
 20. SATISFIED. THE OVERALL SCALE OF THE LANDSCAPE PLANS
 NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED AT A MINIMUM 1:20 SCALE TO MAKE IT
 POSSIBLE FOR THE DETAIL NEEDED FOR REVIEW. THE SCALE
 NEEDS TO BE CALLED OUT ON THE PLAN.
  
 21. SATISFIED. PROPOSED SUBDIVISION LINES NEED TO BE
 INCLUDED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND IDENTIFY ALL BUFFER
 SECTIONS AND INDICATE BUFFER PROVIDED OR NOT.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 3/18/21:
  
 22. PROVIDE DETAILED WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS SO
 STAFF DOES NOT HAVE TO SEARCH THE PLANS FOR THE
 CORRECTIONS.
 23. SATISFIED THE ROWS OF PARKING ALONG THE SOUTH
 BUFFER AND THE GAS AREA SHOULD HAVE THE CURB SHOWN AT
 THE 16 FOOT MARK INSTEAD OF WHEEL STOPS TO ALLOW MORE
 PERVIOUS AREA AS THE OVERHANG.
  
 24. SATISFIED CORRECT TREES #153 AND 154 ON THE TREE
 DISPOSITION PLAN TO MATCH THE ARBORIST EVALUATION.
  
 25. SATISFIED THE BUILDING UNDER THE GAS UMP CANOPY
 MUST SHOW THE 30% FOUNDATION LANDSCAPING REQUIRED.
  
 26. SATISFIED ADD A NOTE TO THE PLAN THAT ALL GROUND
 MOUNTED EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW PER CODE
 REQUIREMENTS.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 6/3/21:
 27. SATISFIED PLANTS IN BIO/WETLAND AREA WITH TRIANGLE
 IN CIRCLE SYMBOL ARE NOT LISTED IN PLANT LIST. ADD TO
 LIST.
 28. SATISFIED AS LISTED IN #17 SCREENING FOR UTILITIES
 DO NOT APPEAR TO BE PRESENT BY FUEL STATION.
 29. SATISFIED AS LISTED IN #5 PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR
 ALL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AS THERE APPEAR TO BE ONES IN THE
 EASTERN PARKING AREA THAT DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM WIDTH
 FOR THE FULL LENGTH OF THE PARKING SPACE. NORTH EAST
 SECTION OF PARKING LOT 4 L SHAPED LANDSCAPE ISLANDS OF
 CONCERN. DIMENSIONS SHOWN FOR WIDE PLANTING AREA BUT
 NOT FOR THE NARROW PARTS OF CONCERN.
 30. SATISFIED MAINTENANCE NOTE: ON EAST SIDE OF BIO
 SWALE COCOPLUMS SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO GROW PROVIDING 6-8
 FT SCREENING OF BUILDING .
 6/24/21
  
 31. SATISFIED THROUGHOUT THE PLAN IT HAD BEEN NOTED
 THAT THERE ARE MANY LOCATIONS WHERE TREES ARE PLANTED
 ON TOP OF OR IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO UTILITY LINES. THIS
 IS NOT PERMITTED
 32. SATISFIED LANDSCAPE DIVIDER MEDIANS ARE REQUIRED IN
 PARKING LOT EAST OF THE FUEL STATION. THIS WAS
 MENTIONED BY RAY CRANCI AND STILL NEEDS TO BE
 ADDRESSED. UPDATE OF PARKING TABLE MAY BE REQUIRED.
 33. SATISFIED THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED TREE COUNTS ON
 THE WPB LANDSCAPE LEGEND CONTAIN ERRORS. THE CITY
 REQUIRES THAT ANY PARTIAL TREE IS ROUNDED UP. THIS
 REQUIRED TREES ON THE EAST, WEST AND EXECUTIVE CENTER
 DRIVE FRONTAGES EACH REQUIRE ONE ADDITIONAL TREE. STAFF
 HAS COUNTED THE TREES ALONG EACH OF THESE BUFFERS AND
 THERE ARE AN ADEQUATE NUMBER OF TREES (NOT TRESS AS
 MISSPELLED ON THE TABLE) PROVIDED, AND ON AT LEAST TWO
 OF THE BUFFERS THE NUMBER PROVIDED IS UNDER COUNTED
 COMPARED WITH WHAT IS PROVIDED.
 34. SATISFIED THE PARKING LOT TERMINAL ISLANDS DO NOT
 HAVE REQUIRED TREES. MARKED UP PLANS WILL BE PROVIDED .
 35. SATISFIED THE EXISTING STORMWATER PIPE FROM BEST
 BUY TO EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE IS NOT SHOWN ON SHEET
 L-200 BUT NOT ON ENLARGED SHEET L-201. THE PROPOSED
 REPLACEMENT 12-FOOT WIDE STORMWATER EASEMENT, CENTERED
 ON THE STORMWATER PIPE, IS NOT SHOWN ON EITHER SHEET.
 THESE MUST BE SHOWN ON BOTH SHEETS SO THAT PLANNING CAN
 VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO TREES PLACED WITHIN THE
 STORMWATER EASEMENT AND THAT TREES IN PROXIMITY TO THE
 EASEMENT HAVE THE PROPER ROOT BARRIER. A WAIVER IS
 REQUIRED FOR THE TREES THAT WILL NOT BE INSTALLED AND
 WITHOUT THE EASEMENT ACCURATELY SHOWN ON THE PLAN,
 STAFF CANNOT ENUMERATE THE SPECIFIC WAIVER REQUIRED.
  
  
  
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
  
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
 6/24/2021
 4. UPDATE WEST SIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER TREE COUNT TO
 REFLECT DRAINAGE EASEMENT. 25 TREES LISTED WPB
 LANDSCAPE LEGEND WEST BUFFER DOES NOT MATCH PLAN .
 SHEET L-210
 7/16/2021
 5. PRIOR TO LANDSCAPE CO UPDATE PLAN TO SHOW ROOT
 BARRIER LOCATION FOR EFFECTED TREES.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 06-25-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By aburnett Date 06-24-2021 Time 09:07 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aburnett Date 06-24-2021 Time 09:06 Sent To  
Notes
2021-06-24 09:07:56FROM: ANDREW BURNETT, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: BJ?S AT BRANDSMART CPD Z20070016
 JUNE 24, 2021
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. DESIGN GUIDELINES:
 ? THE EXCEPTION TO THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER FOR WATER
 BODIES OR I-95 IS NOT SUPPORTED BY STAFF. THE PERIMETER
 OF THE BRANDSMART PD MUST HAVE THE REQUIRED BUFFER AS
 STATED.
 ? BUFFERS MAY BE ADJUSTED TO AVOID UTILITY EASEMENT
 OVERLAP THAT WOULD PREVENT THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING
 FROM BEING ALLOWED. THIS IS REINFORCED BY THE EASEMENT
 REQUIREMENT NOT BEING ALLOWED TO COUNT TOWARD BUFFER
 REQUIREMENT.
 ? ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS MUST MEET ALL THE REQUIREMENTS
 OF ARTICLE XIV ?LANDSCAPING, LAND CLEARING, TREE
 PROTECTION AND ARTIFICIAL TURF?.
 ? ALL BUILDINGS MODIFIED OR ADDED MUST MEET THE 30
 PERCENT LINEAR FOOTAGE REQUIREMENT FOR FOUNDATION
 LANDSCAPING.
 THE DESIGN GUIDELINES ARE NO LONGER NEEDED FOR
 LANDSCAPE ITEMS. NOW THAT THE SUBDIVISION REQUEST ONLY
 CREATES 2 LOTS, CODE REQUIREMENTS CAN BE MET, OR A
 WAIVER REQUESTED.
  
 2. WAIVER REQUESTS.
 ? SATISFIED. #1 SHOULD READ: PROPOSED -WAIVE THE FIVE
 FOOT BUFFER REQUIREMENT FOR INTERIOR LOT LINES.
 ? SATISFIED. #5 UP TO18 PARKING SPACES IN A ROW FOR
 NEW PARKING AREAS WOULD HAVE TO PROVIDE TREE CANOPY IN
 SOME OTHER WAY TO MEET THE INTENT OF 94-443(C). OPTIONS
 ARE CURRENTLY AVAILABLE IN THE CODE TO ALLOW UP TO 12
 SPACES IN A ROW BY EXPANDING THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS.
 THERE IS ALSO AN OPTION TO ELIMINATE PERIMETER
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS BY PROVIDING ALTERNATIVE AREAS FOR
 TREE CANOPY.
 THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLAN HAVE BEEN RECONFIGURED AND
 THE 18 SPACES IS NOT APPLICABLE.
  
  
 3. NO LONGER APPLICABLE. A WAIVER FOR SECTION 94-243,
 TABLE VII-3 COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS REGULATIONS REGARDING
 OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS WOULD HAVE TO BE INCLUDED IF
 40% OPEN SPACE MINIMUM ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS IS NOT MET AS
 THEY ARE DEVELOPED, AS THE MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE AREA IS
 60%. OPEN SPACE BY CODE DEFINITION INCLUDES ALL AREAS
 THAT ARE UNENCLOSED. THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPING IS 15%,
 AND EACH LOT SHOULD BE ABLE TO MEET THIS REQUIREMENT.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWING
 EXISTING AND PROPOSED LANDSCAPE FOR THE LINEAR PARK
 AREA. THE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS ARE TO BE UPGRADES FOR
 THE EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO JUSTIFY REDUCTIONS IN
 LANDSCAPE IN OTHER AREAS, SO THIS NEEDS TO BE
 QUANTIFIED. THE ACTUAL AREA IS PROPOSED TO BE REDUCED
 BY THE ADDITION OF PARKING.
  
 THE DESIGN PROVIDES LITTLE AREA FOR ACTUAL USE BY
 PEOPLE AND THE BAHIA SOD IN THE DRAINAGE AREA DOES NOT
 OFFER ANYTHING DIFFERENT FROM THE STANDARD DESIGN.
 STAFF SUGGESTS ENHANCED PLANTINGS TO MEET THE INTENTION
 OF THE BIOSWALE PROVIDING VISUAL INTEREST AND HABITAT
 CREATION WITH WALKWAYS TO ALLOW ACCESS AND VIEWING OF
 THE ENHANCED AREA. PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE
 COMPARISON FOR TREE CANOPY CURRENTLY EXISTING AND THE
 PROPOSED TREE CANOPY COVERAGE.
 THE LANDSCAPING IN THE ADJACENT RIGHT OF WAY MUST BE
 SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND ENHANCED TO PROVIDE A
 CONTINUOUS DESIGN FOR THE AREA. SECTION 94-452 ROADWAY
 BEAUTIFICATION APPLIES IN THIS CASE TO THE PD SO THE
 LANDSCAPE SHOULD BE DESIGNED, INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED
 BY THE PROPERTY OWNER AS PART OF THE ENHANCED AREA.
  
  
 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443 (C)(3)A.
 REQUIRES A TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND AND REQUIRED TREE
 FOR EACH ROW OF PARKING. (3)B. REQUIRES AN INTERIOR
 LANDSCAPE ISLAND WITH A REQUIRED TREE SO THERE ARE NO
 MORE THAN 10 SPACES IN A ROW. ALL THESE LANDSCAPE AREAS
 MUST MEET THE MINIMUM WIDTH OF 8 FEET OF LANDSCAPE AREA
 AND BE THE FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT SPACE. (3) C.
 REQUIRES DIVIDER MEDIANS WHERE THERE ARE MORE THAN 3
 CONSECUTIVE ROWS OF PARKING. ALL RECONSTRUCTED AREAS OF
 PARKING MUST MEET THESE REQUIREMENTS, AND THE APPROVED
 PLAN FOLLOWED FOR UNALTERED AREAS.
 ALL AREAS OF PARKING ARE BEING RECONSTRUCTED SO PARKING
 LOT LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS APPLY TO ALL AREAS. THE
 DIVIDER MEDIANS MUST BE PROVIDED IF MORE THAN 3
 CONSECUTIVE ROWS OF PARKING. IF CHOOSING TO USE
 94-443(C)(6) B., THE INTERIOR ISLAND MUST BE SPLIT AND
 ALTERNATED. NO ADDITIONAL TREE CANOPY HAS BEEN
 PROVIDED.
 THERE IS ONE LANDSCAPE ISLAND IN THE PARKING AREA SOUTH
 OF BRANDSMART BUILDING THAT DOES NOT HAVE 2 TREES FOR
 THE 2 ROWS OF PARKING.
 PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR ALL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AS THERE
 APPEAR TO BE ONES IN THE EASTERN PARKING AREA THAT DO
 NOT MEET THE MINIMUM WIDTH FOR THE FULL LENGTH OF THE
 PARKING SPACE. NORTH EAST 4 L SHAPED LANDSCAPE ISLANDS.
 6/3/21
  
 6. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A
 MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO
 BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING
 AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE
 PERCENTAGE OF CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR THE
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS AS REQUIRED BY SECTION
 94-443(C)(3) FOR DIVIDER ISLANDS, TERMINAL, AND
 INTERIOR ISLANDS.
 PROVIDE A LISTING OF THE TREES PROVIDED IN THE INTERIOR
 PARKING ISLANDS BY SPECIES AND COUNT AND SHOW
 PERCENTAGE CALCULATED.
  
 7. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING
 LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS. PROVIDE
 THE TOTAL REQUIRED AND PROVIDED AS ONE TOTAL FOR BOTH
 SECTIONS. A SEPARATE EXHIBIT MUST BE PROVIDED TO
 DEMONSTRATE THE AREAS COUNTED.
 THERE SHOULD BE 3 AREAS SHOWN WITH DIFFERENT SHADING OR
 GRAPHIC. PARKING SPACES, OTHER VEHICULAR USE AREAS AND
 INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREAS NEED TO BE IDENTIFIED AND
 QUANTIFIED. SECTION 94-443 (C)FIGURE XIV-1 SHOULD BE
 USED TO DISCERN INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREAS. THERE ARE
 ALSO SOME AREAS SHOWN ACROSS PARCEL LINES ON THE SHEETS
 L-211 AND L-212.
  
  
 8. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO TREE
 DISPOSITION CHART SHEET L-101:
 ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE A COMPLETE TREE SURVEY THAT
 INCLUDES ALL EXISTING TREES AND PALMS. COMPLETE ALL
 COLUMNS FOR MISSING INFORMATION.
 ? SATISFIED. LIST OFF SITE TREES AND PALMS AS OFF SITE.
 THESE WOULD REQUIRE A SEPARATE PERMIT FROM THE OWNER OF
 THAT PROPERTY FOR REMOVAL.
 ? SATISFIED. IF CANOPY DIAMETERS ARE 20 FEET OR MORE,
 CALCULATE THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE AND ENTER INTO THE
 MITIGATION DUE COLUMN IF PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL. IF UNDER
 20 FEET, THE SQUARE FOOTAGE IS BASED ON THE CATEGORY
 FOR THE TREE.
  
 ? SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN AND LIST THE CATEGORY 1, 2,
 3, OR 4 FOR EACH TREE AND PALM FROM THE CITY REFERENCE
 LIST.
  
 ? SATISFIED. REMOVE ?UNIDENTIFIED PALM? AND LIST THE
 SCIENTIFIC AND COMMON NAME, AS ALL TREES MUST BE
 PROPERLY IDENTIFIED.
 ? SATISFIED. CHANGE CANOPY AREA COLUMN TO CANOPY
 MITIGATION DUE, AND LIST SQUARE FOOTAGE IF MITIGATION
 IS DUE.
 ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF
 MITIGATION DUE AND SHOW MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE
 PROVIDED FROM THE PROPOSED TREE LIST AFTER ALL
 CORRECTIONS.
  
 ? SATISFIED. INCLUDE A LIST OF ALL SPECIES AND
 QUANTITIES COUNTED TOWARD MITIGATION BASED ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN, NOT INCLUDING REPLACEMENTS FOR MISSING
 APPROVED TREES AND PALMS.
  
  
 9. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
 EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
 POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE CONDITION FOR ALL EXISTING
 TREES AND PALMS AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE
 TREES AND PALMS BASED ON A CERTIFIED ARBORISTS REPORT.
 THE FOLLOWING SABAL PALMS AND ROYAL PALMS ARE LISTED IN
 GOOD CONDITION ON THE ARBORIST REPORT YET ARE LISTED
 FOR REMOVAL. PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION. SABAL PALM NUMBER:
 43, 44, 45, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236,
 237, 238, 239, 240, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248,
 249, 250, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 264
 ROYAL PALM NUMBER: 146, 149, 151, 175, 176, 177, 193,
 195, 197, 201, 202, 218,219
  
  
 10. SATISFIED. BUFFER LENGTHS REQUIRE ONE TREE PER 30
 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR EACH BUFFER LENGTH. PROVIDE
 THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED BUFFER TREES IN A CHART WITH
 THE INDIVIDUAL BUFFER SECTIONS IDENTIFIED.
 PROVIDE THE BUFFER SECTIONS AND THE REQUIRED AND
 PROVIDED TREES FOR EACH SECTION FOR BOTH PARCELS. THERE
 WILL BE FOUR SECTIONS FOR EACH PARCEL WITH THE INTERIOR
 LOT LINES INDICATED AS NOT PROVIDED PER THE WAIVER
 REQUEST. SECTIONS CANNOT BE COMBINED.
  
 NOTE WITH LABEL REFERENCING SECTION 94-443(B)2 DOES NOT
 APPLY, AS THERE IS NO VEHICLE INGRESS OR EGRESS AT THE
 LOCATIONS ALONG I 95.
 EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEMENT ALONG WESTERN BUFFER MAY BE
 ABANDONED BY THE CITY IF NOT NEEDED, SO THIS AREA NEEDS
 TO COMPLY WITH THE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AND BE
 COORDINATED WITH THE ADJOINING PROPERTY AND THE CITY.
  
 11. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE FOUNDATION PLANTING
 CALCULATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR EACH BUILDING.
  
 12. SATISFIED. REQUIRED TREES PER OPEN SPACE ARE NOT
 PROVIDED, THIS WOULD REQUIRE A WAIVER.
 THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE CALCULATION SHOULD BE 40
 PERCENT OF THE TOTAL PARCEL SQUARE FOOTAGE. CORRECT FOR
 EACH LOT AND RECALCULATE REQUIRED TREES, FLOWERING
 TREES AND SHRUBS.
  
 13. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF
 SUBSTITUTION OF PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES. SECTION
 94-442(D) REQUIRES A 3:1 RATIO FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR
 PALMS EXCEPT THE LISTED 1:1 SPECIES.
 COULD NOT LOCATE ON PLANS.
  
 14. SATISFIED. ADD A SECTION IN THE LANDSCAPE DATA
 CHART TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A
 MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE
 FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED
 FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST
 RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT
 DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE
 THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT
 PLANTS BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST.
 COULD NOT LOCATE ON PLANS.
  
  
 15. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING
 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND REDESIGN THE LOCATIONS OF THE
 LIGHTING ON SHORTER POLES TO RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH
 TREES IN THE PARKING AREA LANDSCAPE ISLANDS.
  
 16. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 VALVES AND EQUIPMENT.
 ALL THE LOCATIONS NEED TO BE IDENTIFIED IN SOME WAY.
  
 17. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH
 LANDSCAPING. EXISTING UTILITIES CLOSE TO FUEL STATION
 DO NOT APPEAR TO HAVE LANDSCAPE SCREEN 6/2/21
 ALL THE LOCATIONS NEED TO BE IDENTIFIED IN SOME WAY.
  
 18. SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN TO THE PLANT LIST FOR
 DROUGHT TOLERANT LEVELS OF EACH SPECIES.
  
 ADD A COLUMN INSTEAD OF ADDING THE INFORMATION UNDER
 THE PLANT NAME.
  
 19. SATISFIED. MINIMUM TREE SIZES ARE 12 FEET HEIGHT,
 CORRECT ON PLANT LIST.
  
 SILVER BUTTONWOOD TREES ARE REQUIRED AT 12 FEET HEIGHT.
 TREES ARE PROHIBITED FROM BEING TRIMMED INTO SHAPES AND
 MUST BE ALLOWED TO DEVELOP INTO THEIR MATURE SIZE TO
 FULFILL THE CODE REQUIREMENTS. PROVIDE REASON FOR
 SMALLER SIZES AND SPECIES BEING USED IN BUFFERS AND
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS.
  
 20. SATISFIED. THE OVERALL SCALE OF THE LANDSCAPE PLANS
 NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED AT A MINIMUM 1:20 SCALE TO MAKE IT
 POSSIBLE FOR THE DETAIL NEEDED FOR REVIEW. THE SCALE
 NEEDS TO BE CALLED OUT ON THE PLAN.
  
 21. SATISFIED. PROPOSED SUBDIVISION LINES NEED TO BE
 INCLUDED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND IDENTIFY ALL BUFFER
 SECTIONS AND INDICATE BUFFER PROVIDED OR NOT.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 3/18/21:
  
 22. PROVIDE DETAILED WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS SO
 STAFF DOES NOT HAVE TO SEARCH THE PLANS FOR THE
 CORRECTIONS.
 23. SATISFIED THE ROWS OF PARKING ALONG THE SOUTH
 BUFFER AND THE GAS AREA SHOULD HAVE THE CURB SHOWN AT
 THE 16 FOOT MARK INSTEAD OF WHEEL STOPS TO ALLOW MORE
 PERVIOUS AREA AS THE OVERHANG.
  
 24. SATISFIED CORRECT TREES #153 AND 154 ON THE TREE
 DISPOSITION PLAN TO MATCH THE ARBORIST EVALUATION.
  
 25. SATISFIED THE BUILDING UNDER THE GAS UMP CANOPY
 MUST SHOW THE 30% FOUNDATION LANDSCAPING REQUIRED.
  
 26. SATISFIED ADD A NOTE TO THE PLAN THAT ALL GROUND
 MOUNTED EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW PER CODE
 REQUIREMENTS.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 6/3/21:
 27. SATISFIED PLANTS IN BIO/WETLAND AREA WITH TRIANGLE
 IN CIRCLE SYMBOL ARE NOT LISTED IN PLANT LIST. ADD TO
 LIST.
 28. SATISFIED AS LISTED IN #17 SCREENING FOR UTILITIES
 DO NOT APPEAR TO BE PRESENT BY FUEL STATION.
 29. SATISFIED AS LISTED IN #5 PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR
 ALL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AS THERE APPEAR TO BE ONES IN THE
 EASTERN PARKING AREA THAT DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM WIDTH
 FOR THE FULL LENGTH OF THE PARKING SPACE. NORTH EAST
 SECTION OF PARKING LOT 4 L SHAPED LANDSCAPE ISLANDS OF
 CONCERN. DIMENSIONS SHOWN FOR WIDE PLANTING AREA BUT
 NOT FOR THE NARROW PARTS OF CONCERN.
 30. SATISFIED MAINTENANCE NOTE: ON EAST SIDE OF BIO
 SWALE COCOPLUMS SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO GROW PROVIDING 6-8
 FT SCREENING OF BUILDING .
 6/24/21
  
 31. THROUGHOUT THE PLAN IT HAD BEEN NOTED THAT THERE
 ARE MANY LOCATIONS WHERE TREES ARE PLANTED ONTOP OF OR
 IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO UTILITE LINES. THIS IS NOT
 PERMITTED
 32. LANDSCAPE DEVIDER MEDIANS ARE REQUIRED IN PARKING
 LOT EAST OF THE FUEL STATION. THIS WAS MENTIONED BY RAY
 CRANCI AND STILL NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED. UPDATE OF
 PARKING TABLE MAY BE REQUIRED.
 33.THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED TREE COUNTS ON THE WPB
 LANDSCAPE LEGEND CONTAIN ERRORS. THE CITY REQUIRES THAT
 ANY PARTIAL TREE IS ROUNDED UP. THIS REQUIRED TREES ON
 THE EAST, WEST AND EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE FRONTAGES
 EACH REQUIRE ONE ADDITIONAL TREE. STAFF HAS COUNTED THE
 TREES ALONG EACH OF THESE BUFFERS AND THERE ARE AN
 ADEQUATE NUMBER OF TREES (NOT TRESS AS MISSPELLED ON
 THE TABLE) PROVIDED, AND ON AT LEAST TWO OF THE BUFFERS
 THE NUMBER PROVIDED IS UNDER COUNTED COMPARED WITH WHAT
 IS PROVIDED.
 34. THE PARKING LOT TURMINAL ISLANDS DO NOT HAVE
 REQUIRED TREES. MARKED UP PLANS WILL BE PROVIDED .
 35.THE EXISTING STORMWATER PIPE FROM BEST BUY TO
 EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE IS NOT SHOWN ON SHEET L-200 BUT
 NOT ON ENLARGED SHEET L-201. THE PROPOSED REPLACEMENT
 12-FOOT WIDE STORMWATER EASEMENT, CENTERED ON THE
 STORMWATER PIPE, IS NOT SHOWN ON EITHER SHEET. THESE
 MUST BE SHOWN ON BOTH SHEETS SO THAT PLANNING CAN
 VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO TREES PLACED WITHIN THE
 STORMWATER EASEMENT AND THAT TREES IN PROXIMITY TO THE
 EASEMENT HAVE THE PROPER ROOT BARRIER. A WAIVER IS
 REQUIRED FOR THE TREES THAT WILL NOT BE INSTALLED AND
 WITHOUT THE EASEMENT ACCURATELY SHOWN ON THE PLAN,
 STAFF CANNOT ENUMERATE THE SPECIFIC WAIVER REQUIRED.
  
  
  
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
 6/24/2021
 4. UPDATE WEST SIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER TREE COUNT TO
 REFLECT DRAINAGE EASEMENT. 25 TREES LISTED WPB
 LANDSCAPE LEGEND WEST BUFFER DOES NOT MATCH PLAN .
 SHEET L-210
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 06-03-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 06-03-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-06-03 13:23:17FROM: ANDREW BURNETT, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1562
 PROJECT: BJ?S AT BRANDSMART CPD Z20070016
 JUNE 2, 2021
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. DESIGN GUIDELINES:
 ? THE EXCEPTION TO THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER FOR WATER
 BODIES OR I-95 IS NOT SUPPORTED BY STAFF. THE PERIMETER
 OF THE BRANDSMART PD MUST HAVE THE REQUIRED BUFFER AS
 STATED.
 ? BUFFERS MAY BE ADJUSTED TO AVOID UTILITY EASEMENT
 OVERLAP THAT WOULD PREVENT THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING
 FROM BEING ALLOWED. THIS IS REINFORCED BY THE EASEMENT
 REQUIREMENT NOT BEING ALLOWED TO COUNT TOWARD BUFFER
 REQUIREMENT.
 ? ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS MUST MEET ALL THE REQUIREMENTS
 OF ARTICLE XIV ?LANDSCAPING, LAND CLEARING, TREE
 PROTECTION AND ARTIFICIAL TURF?.
 ? ALL BUILDINGS MODIFIED OR ADDED MUST MEET THE 30
 PERCENT LINEAR FOOTAGE REQUIREMENT FOR FOUNDATION
 LANDSCAPING.
 THE DESIGN GUIDELINES ARE NO LONGER NEEDED FOR
 LANDSCAPE ITEMS. NOW THAT THE SUBDIVISION REQUEST ONLY
 CREATES 2 LOTS, CODE REQUIREMENTS CAN BE MET, OR A
 WAIVER REQUESTED.
  
 2. WAIVER REQUESTS.
 ? SATISFIED. #1 SHOULD READ: PROPOSED -WAIVE THE FIVE
 FOOT BUFFER REQUIREMENT FOR INTERIOR LOT LINES.
 ? SATISFIED. #5 UP TO18 PARKING SPACES IN A ROW FOR
 NEW PARKING AREAS WOULD HAVE TO PROVIDE TREE CANOPY IN
 SOME OTHER WAY TO MEET THE INTENT OF 94-443(C). OPTIONS
 ARE CURRENTLY AVAILABLE IN THE CODE TO ALLOW UP TO 12
 SPACES IN A ROW BY EXPANDING THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS.
 THERE IS ALSO AN OPTION TO ELIMINATE PERIMETER
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS BY PROVIDING ALTERNATIVE AREAS FOR
 TREE CANOPY.
 THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLAN HAVE BEEN RECONFIGURED AND
 THE 18 SPACES IS NOT APPLICABLE.
  
  
 3. NO LONGER APPLICABLE. A WAIVER FOR SECTION 94-243,
 TABLE VII-3 COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS REGULATIONS REGARDING
 OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS WOULD HAVE TO BE INCLUDED IF
 40% OPEN SPACE MINIMUM ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS IS NOT MET AS
 THEY ARE DEVELOPED, AS THE MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE AREA IS
 60%. OPEN SPACE BY CODE DEFINITION INCLUDES ALL AREAS
 THAT ARE UNENCLOSED. THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPING IS 15%,
 AND EACH LOT SHOULD BE ABLE TO MEET THIS REQUIREMENT.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWING
 EXISTING AND PROPOSED LANDSCAPE FOR THE LINEAR PARK
 AREA. THE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS ARE TO BE UPGRADES FOR
 THE EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO JUSTIFY REDUCTIONS IN
 LANDSCAPE IN OTHER AREAS, SO THIS NEEDS TO BE
 QUANTIFIED. THE ACTUAL AREA IS PROPOSED TO BE REDUCED
 BY THE ADDITION OF PARKING.
  
 THE DESIGN PROVIDES LITTLE AREA FOR ACTUAL USE BY
 PEOPLE AND THE BAHIA SOD IN THE DRAINAGE AREA DOES NOT
 OFFER ANYTHING DIFFERENT FROM THE STANDARD DESIGN.
 STAFF SUGGESTS ENHANCED PLANTINGS TO MEET THE INTENTION
 OF THE BIOSWALE PROVIDING VISUAL INTEREST AND HABITAT
 CREATION WITH WALKWAYS TO ALLOW ACCESS AND VIEWING OF
 THE ENHANCED AREA. PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE
 COMPARISON FOR TREE CANOPY CURRENTLY EXISTING AND THE
 PROPOSED TREE CANOPY COVERAGE.
 THE LANDSCAPING IN THE ADJACENT RIGHT OF WAY MUST BE
 SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND ENHANCED TO PROVIDE A
 CONTINUOUS DESIGN FOR THE AREA. SECTION 94-452 ROADWAY
 BEAUTIFICATION APPLIES IN THIS CASE TO THE PD SO THE
 LANDSCAPE SHOULD BE DESIGNED, INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED
 BY THE PROPERTY OWNER AS PART OF THE ENHANCED AREA.
  
  
 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443 (C)(3)A.
 REQUIRES A TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND AND REQUIRED TREE
 FOR EACH ROW OF PARKING. (3)B. REQUIRES AN INTERIOR
 LANDSCAPE ISLAND WITH A REQUIRED TREE SO THERE ARE NO
 MORE THAN 10 SPACES IN A ROW. ALL THESE LANDSCAPE AREAS
 MUST MEET THE MINIMUM WIDTH OF 8 FEET OF LANDSCAPE AREA
 AND BE THE FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT SPACE. (3) C.
 REQUIRES DIVIDER MEDIANS WHERE THERE ARE MORE THAN 3
 CONSECUTIVE ROWS OF PARKING. ALL RECONSTRUCTED AREAS OF
 PARKING MUST MEET THESE REQUIREMENTS, AND THE APPROVED
 PLAN FOLLOWED FOR UNALTERED AREAS.
 ALL AREAS OF PARKING ARE BEING RECONSTRUCTED SO PARKING
 LOT LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS APPLY TO ALL AREAS. THE
 DIVIDER MEDIANS MUST BE PROVIDED IF MORE THAN 3
 CONSECUTIVE ROWS OF PARKING. IF CHOOSING TO USE
 94-443(C)(6) B., THE INTERIOR ISLAND MUST BE SPLIT AND
 ALTERNATED. NO ADDITIONAL TREE CANOPY HAS BEEN
 PROVIDED.
 THERE IS ONE LANDSCAPE ISLAND IN THE PARKING AREA SOUTH
 OF BRANDSMART BUILDING THAT DOES NOT HAVE 2 TREES FOR
 THE 2 ROWS OF PARKING.
 PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR ALL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AS THERE
 APPEAR TO BE ONES IN THE EASTERN PARKING AREA THAT DO
 NOT MEET THE MINIMUM WIDTH FOR THE FULL LENGTH OF THE
 PARKING SPACE. NORTH EAST 4 L SHAPED LANDSCAPE ISLANDS.
 6/3/21
  
 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES
 THAT A MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE
 REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF
 STREET PARKING AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES.
 SHOW THE PERCENTAGE OF CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR
 THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS AS REQUIRED BY SECTION
 94-443(C)(3) FOR DIVIDER ISLANDS, TERMINAL, AND
 INTERIOR ISLANDS.
 PROVIDE A LISTING OF THE TREES PROVIDED IN THE INTERIOR
 PARKING ISLANDS BY SPECIES AND COUNT AND SHOW
 PERCENTAGE CALCULATED.
  
 7. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING
 LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS. PROVIDE
 THE TOTAL REQUIRED AND PROVIDED AS ONE TOTAL FOR BOTH
 SECTIONS. A SEPARATE EXHIBIT MUST BE PROVIDED TO
 DEMONSTRATE THE AREAS COUNTED.
 THERE SHOULD BE 3 AREAS SHOWN WITH DIFFERENT SHADING OR
 GRAPHIC. PARKING SPACES, OTHER VEHICULAR USE AREAS AND
 INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREAS NEED TO BE IDENTIFIED AND
 QUANTIFIED. SECTION 94-443 (C)FIGURE XIV-1 SHOULD BE
 USED TO DISCERN INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREAS. THERE ARE
 ALSO SOME AREAS SHOWN ACROSS PARCEL LINES ON THE SHEETS
 L-211 AND L-212.
  
  
 8. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO TREE
 DISPOSITION CHART SHEET L-101:
 ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE A COMPLETE TREE SURVEY THAT
 INCLUDES ALL EXISTING TREES AND PALMS. COMPLETE ALL
 COLUMNS FOR MISSING INFORMATION.
 ? SATISFIED. LIST OFF SITE TREES AND PALMS AS OFF SITE.
 THESE WOULD REQUIRE A SEPARATE PERMIT FROM THE OWNER OF
 THAT PROPERTY FOR REMOVAL.
 ? SATISFIED. IF CANOPY DIAMETERS ARE 20 FEET OR MORE,
 CALCULATE THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE AND ENTER INTO THE
 MITIGATION DUE COLUMN IF PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL. IF UNDER
 20 FEET, THE SQUARE FOOTAGE IS BASED ON THE CATEGORY
 FOR THE TREE.
  
 ? SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN AND LIST THE CATEGORY 1, 2,
 3, OR 4 FOR EACH TREE AND PALM FROM THE CITY REFERENCE
 LIST.
  
 ? SATISFIED. REMOVE ?UNIDENTIFIED PALM? AND LIST THE
 SCIENTIFIC AND COMMON NAME, AS ALL TREES MUST BE
 PROPERLY IDENTIFIED.
 ? SATISFIED. CHANGE CANOPY AREA COLUMN TO CANOPY
 MITIGATION DUE, AND LIST SQUARE FOOTAGE IF MITIGATION
 IS DUE.
 ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF
 MITIGATION DUE AND SHOW MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE
 PROVIDED FROM THE PROPOSED TREE LIST AFTER ALL
 CORRECTIONS.
  
 ? SATISFIED. INCLUDE A LIST OF ALL SPECIES AND
 QUANTITIES COUNTED TOWARD MITIGATION BASED ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN, NOT INCLUDING REPLACEMENTS FOR MISSING
 APPROVED TREES AND PALMS.
  
  
 9. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
 EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
 POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE CONDITION FOR ALL EXISTING
 TREES AND PALMS AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE
 TREES AND PALMS BASED ON A CERTIFIED ARBORISTS REPORT.
 THE FOLLOWING SABAL PALMS AND ROYAL PALMS ARE LISTED IN
 GOOD CONDITION ON THE ARBORIST REPORT YET ARE LISTED
 FOR REMOVAL. PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION. SABAL PALM NUMBER:
 43, 44, 45, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236,
 237, 238, 239, 240, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248,
 249, 250, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 264
 ROYAL PALM NUMBER: 146, 149, 151, 175, 176, 177, 193,
 195, 197, 201, 202, 218,219
  
  
 10. SATISFIED. BUFFER LENGTHS REQUIRE ONE TREE PER 30
 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR EACH BUFFER LENGTH. PROVIDE
 THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED BUFFER TREES IN A CHART WITH
 THE INDIVIDUAL BUFFER SECTIONS IDENTIFIED.
 PROVIDE THE BUFFER SECTIONS AND THE REQUIRED AND
 PROVIDED TREES FOR EACH SECTION FOR BOTH PARCELS. THERE
 WILL BE FOUR SECTIONS FOR EACH PARCEL WITH THE INTERIOR
 LOT LINES INDICATED AS NOT PROVIDED PER THE WAIVER
 REQUEST. SECTIONS CANNOT BE COMBINED.
  
 NOTE WITH LABEL REFERENCING SECTION 94-443(B)2 DOES NOT
 APPLY, AS THERE IS NO VEHICLE INGRESS OR EGRESS AT THE
 LOCATIONS ALONG I 95.
 EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEMENT ALONG WESTERN BUFFER MAY BE
 ABANDONED BY THE CITY IF NOT NEEDED, SO THIS AREA NEEDS
 TO COMPLY WITH THE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AND BE
 COORDINATED WITH THE ADJOINING PROPERTY AND THE CITY.
  
 11. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE FOUNDATION PLANTING
 CALCULATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR EACH BUILDING.
  
 12. SATISFIED. REQUIRED TREES PER OPEN SPACE ARE NOT
 PROVIDED, THIS WOULD REQUIRE A WAIVER.
 THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE CALCULATION SHOULD BE 40
 PERCENT OF THE TOTAL PARCEL SQUARE FOOTAGE. CORRECT FOR
 EACH LOT AND RECALCULATE REQUIRED TREES, FLOWERING
 TREES AND SHRUBS.
  
 13. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF
 SUBSTITUTION OF PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES. SECTION
 94-442(D) REQUIRES A 3:1 RATIO FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR
 PALMS EXCEPT THE LISTED 1:1 SPECIES.
 COULD NOT LOCATE ON PLANS.
  
 14. SATISFIED. ADD A SECTION IN THE LANDSCAPE DATA
 CHART TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A
 MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE
 FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED
 FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST
 RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT
 DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE
 THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT
 PLANTS BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST.
 COULD NOT LOCATE ON PLANS.
  
  
 15. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING
 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND REDESIGN THE LOCATIONS OF THE
 LIGHTING ON SHORTER POLES TO RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH
 TREES IN THE PARKING AREA LANDSCAPE ISLANDS.
  
 16. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 VALVES AND EQUIPMENT.
 ALL THE LOCATIONS NEED TO BE IDENTIFIED IN SOME WAY.
  
 17. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL
 TRANSFORMERS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE
 CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. EXISTING UTILITIES CLOSE TO
 FUEL STATION DO NOT APPEAR TO HAVE LANDSCAPE SCREEN
 6/2/21
 ALL THE LOCATIONS NEED TO BE IDENTIFIED IN SOME WAY.
  
 18. SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN TO THE PLANT LIST FOR
 DROUGHT TOLERANT LEVELS OF EACH SPECIES.
  
 ADD A COLUMN INSTEAD OF ADDING THE INFORMATION UNDER
 THE PLANT NAME.
  
 19. SATISFIED. MINIMUM TREE SIZES ARE 12 FEET HEIGHT,
 CORRECT ON PLANT LIST.
  
 SILVER BUTTONWOOD TREES ARE REQUIRED AT 12 FEET HEIGHT.
 TREES ARE PROHIBITED FROM BEING TRIMMED INTO SHAPES AND
 MUST BE ALLOWED TO DEVELOP INTO THEIR MATURE SIZE TO
 FULFILL THE CODE REQUIREMENTS. PROVIDE REASON FOR
 SMALLER SIZES AND SPECIES BEING USED IN BUFFERS AND
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS.
  
 20. SATISFIED. THE OVERALL SCALE OF THE LANDSCAPE PLANS
 NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED AT A MINIMUM 1:20 SCALE TO MAKE IT
 POSSIBLE FOR THE DETAIL NEEDED FOR REVIEW. THE SCALE
 NEEDS TO BE CALLED OUT ON THE PLAN.
  
 21. SATISFIED. PROPOSED SUBDIVISION LINES NEED TO BE
 INCLUDED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND IDENTIFY ALL BUFFER
 SECTIONS AND INDICATE BUFFER PROVIDED OR NOT.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 3/18/21:
  
 22. PROVIDE DETAILED WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS SO
 STAFF DOES NOT HAVE TO SEARCH THE PLANS FOR THE
 CORRECTIONS.
 23. SATISFIED THE ROWS OF PARKING ALONG THE SOUTH
 BUFFER AND THE GAS AREA SHOULD HAVE THE CURB SHOWN AT
 THE 16 FOOT MARK INSTEAD OF WHEEL STOPS TO ALLOW MORE
 PERVIOUS AREA AS THE OVERHANG.
  
 24. SATISFIED CORRECT TREES #153 AND 154 ON THE TREE
 DISPOSITION PLAN TO MATCH THE ARBORIST EVALUATION.
  
 25. SATISFIED THE BUILDING UNDER THE GAS UMP CANOPY
 MUST SHOW THE 30% FOUNDATION LANDSCAPING REQUIRED.
  
 26. SATISFIED ADD A NOTE TO THE PLAN THAT ALL GROUND
 MOUNTED EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW PER CODE
 REQUIREMENTS.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 6/3/21:
 27. PLANTS IN BIO/WETLAND AREA WITH TRIANGLE IN CIRCLE
 SYMBOL ARE NOT LISTED IN PLANT LIST. ADD TO LIST.
 28. AS LISTED IN #17 SCREENING FOR UTILITIES DO NOT
 APPEAR TO BE PRESENT BY FUEL STATION.
 29. AS LISTED IN #5 PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR ALL
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AS THERE APPEAR TO BE ONES IN THE
 EASTERN PARKING AREA THAT DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM WIDTH
 FOR THE FULL LENGTH OF THE PARKING SPACE. NORTH EAST
 SECTION OF PARKING LOT 4 L SHAPED LANDSCAPE ISLANDS OF
 CONCERN. DIMENSIONS SHOWN FOR WIDE PLANTING AREA BUT
 NOT FOR THE NARROW PARTS OF CONCERN.
 30. MAINTENANCE NOTE: ON EAST SIDE OF BIO SWALE
 COCOPLUMS SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO GROW PROVIDING 6-8 FT
 SCREENING OF BUILDING .
  
  
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 03-18-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 03-18-2021 Time 11:21 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 03-18-2021 Time 11:21 Sent To  
Notes
2021-03-18 11:23:01FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: BJ?S AT BRANDSMART CPD Z20070016
 MARCH 17, 2021
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. NOT SATISFIED. DESIGN GUIDELINES:
 ? THE EXCEPTION TO THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER FOR WATER
 BODIES OR I-95 IS NOT SUPPORTED BY STAFF. THE PERIMETER
 OF THE BRANDSMART PD MUST HAVE THE REQUIRED BUFFER AS
 STATED.
 ? BUFFERS MAY BE ADJUSTED TO AVOID UTILITY EASEMENT
 OVERLAP THAT WOULD PREVENT THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING
 FROM BEING ALLOWED. THIS IS REINFORCED BY THE EASEMENT
 REQUIREMENT NOT BEING ALLOWED TO COUNT TOWARD BUFFER
 REQUIREMENT.
 ? ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS MUST MEET ALL THE REQUIREMENTS
 OF ARTICLE XIV ?LANDSCAPING, LAND CLEARING, TREE
 PROTECTION AND ARTIFICIAL TURF?.
 ? ALL BUILDINGS MODIFIED OR ADDED MUST MEET THE 30
 PERCENT LINEAR FOOTAGE REQUIREMENT FOR FOUNDATION
 LANDSCAPING.
 THE DESIGN GUIDELINES ARE NO LONGER NEEDED FOR
 LANDSCAPE ITEMS. NOW THAT THE SUBDIVISION REQUEST ONLY
 CREATES 2 LOTS, CODE REQUIREMENTS CAN BE MET, OR A
 WAIVER REQUESTED.
  
 2. WAIVER REQUESTS.
 ? SATISFIED. #1 SHOULD READ: PROPOSED -WAIVE THE FIVE
 FOOT BUFFER REQUIREMENT FOR INTERIOR LOT LINES.
 ? NOT SATISFIED. #5 UP TO18 PARKING SPACES IN A ROW FOR
 NEW PARKING AREAS WOULD HAVE TO PROVIDE TREE CANOPY IN
 SOME OTHER WAY TO MEET THE INTENT OF 94-443(C). OPTIONS
 ARE CURRENTLY AVAILABLE IN THE CODE TO ALLOW UP TO 12
 SPACES IN A ROW BY EXPANDING THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS.
 THERE IS ALSO AN OPTION TO ELIMINATE PERIMETER
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS BY PROVIDING ALTERNATIVE AREAS FOR
 TREE CANOPY.
 THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLAN HAVE BEEN RECONFIGURED AND
 THE 18 SPACES IS NOT APPLICABLE.
  
  
 3. NO LONGER APPLICABLE. A WAIVER FOR SECTION 94-243,
 TABLE VII-3 COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS REGULATIONS REGARDING
 OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS WOULD HAVE TO BE INCLUDED IF
 40% OPEN SPACE MINIMUM ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS IS NOT MET AS
 THEY ARE DEVELOPED, AS THE MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE AREA IS
 60%. OPEN SPACE BY CODE DEFINITION INCLUDES ALL AREAS
 THAT ARE UNENCLOSED. THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPING IS 15%,
 AND EACH LOT SHOULD BE ABLE TO MEET THIS REQUIREMENT.
  
 4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN
 SHOWING EXISTING AND PROPOSED LANDSCAPE FOR THE LINEAR
 PARK AREA. THE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS ARE TO BE
 UPGRADES FOR THE EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO JUSTIFY
 REDUCTIONS IN LANDSCAPE IN OTHER AREAS, SO THIS NEEDS
 TO BE QUANTIFIED. THE ACTUAL AREA IS PROPOSED TO BE
 REDUCED BY THE ADDITION OF PARKING.
  
 THE DESIGN PROVIDES LITTLE AREA FOR ACTUAL USE BY
 PEOPLE AND THE BAHIA SOD IN THE DRAINAGE AREA DOES NOT
 OFFER ANYTHING DIFFERENT FROM THE STANDARD DESIGN.
 STAFF SUGGESTS ENHANCED PLANTINGS TO MEET THE INTENTION
 OF THE BIOSWALE PROVIDING VISUAL INTEREST AND HABITAT
 CREATION WITH WALKWAYS TO ALLOW ACCESS AND VIEWING OF
 THE ENHANCED AREA. PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE
 COMPARISON FOR TREE CANOPY CURRENTLY EXISTING AND THE
 PROPOSED TREE CANOPY COVERAGE.
 THE LANDSCAPING IN THE ADJACENT RIGHT OF WAY MUST BE
 SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND ENHANCED TO PROVIDE A
 CONTINUOUS DESIGN FOR THE AREA. SECTION 94-452 ROADWAY
 BEAUTIFICATION APPLIES IN THIS CASE TO THE PD SO THE
 LANDSCAPE SHOULD BE DESIGNED, INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED
 BY THE PROPERTY OWNER AS PART OF THE ENHANCED AREA.
  
  
 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443 (C)(3)A.
 REQUIRES A TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND AND REQUIRED TREE
 FOR EACH ROW OF PARKING. (3)B. REQUIRES AN INTERIOR
 LANDSCAPE ISLAND WITH A REQUIRED TREE SO THERE ARE NO
 MORE THAN 10 SPACES IN A ROW. ALL THESE LANDSCAPE AREAS
 MUST MEET THE MINIMUM WIDTH OF 8 FEET OF LANDSCAPE AREA
 AND BE THE FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT SPACE. (3) C.
 REQUIRES DIVIDER MEDIANS WHERE THERE ARE MORE THAN 3
 CONSECUTIVE ROWS OF PARKING. ALL RECONSTRUCTED AREAS OF
 PARKING MUST MEET THESE REQUIREMENTS, AND THE APPROVED
 PLAN FOLLOWED FOR UNALTERED AREAS.
 ALL AREAS OF PARKING ARE BEING RECONSTRUCTED SO PARKING
 LOT LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS APPLY TO ALL AREAS. THE
 DIVIDER MEDIANS MUST BE PROVIDED IF MORE THAN 3
 CONSECUTIVE ROWS OF PARKING. IF CHOOSING TO USE
 94-443(C)(6) B., THE INTERIOR ISLAND MUST BE SPLIT AND
 ALTERNATED. NO ADDITIONAL TREE CANOPY HAS BEEN
 PROVIDED.
 THERE IS ONE LANDSCAPE ISLAND IN THE PARKING AREA SOUTH
 OF BRANDSMART BUILDING THAT DOES NOT HAVE 2 TREES FOR
 THE 2 ROWS OF PARKING.
 PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR ALL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AS THERE
 APPEAR TO BE ONES IN THE EASTERN PARKING AREA THAT DO
 NOT MEET THE MINIMUM WIDTH FOR THE FULL LENGTH OF THE
 PARKING SPACE.
  
 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES
 THAT A MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE
 REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF
 STREET PARKING AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES.
 SHOW THE PERCENTAGE OF CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR
 THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS AS REQUIRED BY SECTION
 94-443(C)(3) FOR DIVIDER ISLANDS, TERMINAL, AND
 INTERIOR ISLANDS.
 PROVIDE A LISTING OF THE TREES PROVIDED IN THE INTERIOR
 PARKING ISLANDS BY SPECIES AND COUNT AND SHOW
 PERCENTAGE CALCULATED.
  
 7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE
 PARKING LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH
 SECTION 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS.
 PROVIDE THE TOTAL REQUIRED AND PROVIDED AS ONE TOTAL
 FOR BOTH SECTIONS. A SEPARATE EXHIBIT MUST BE PROVIDED
 TO DEMONSTRATE THE AREAS COUNTED.
 THERE SHOULD BE 3 AREAS SHOWN WITH DIFFERENT SHADING OR
 GRAPHIC. PARKING SPACES, OTHER VEHICULAR USE AREAS AND
 INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREAS NEED TO BE IDENTIFIED AND
 QUANTIFIED. SECTION 94-443 (C)FIGURE XIV-1 SHOULD BE
 USED TO DISCERN INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREAS. THERE ARE
 ALSO SOME AREAS SHOWN ACROSS PARCEL LINES ON THE SHEETS
 L-211 AND L-212.
  
  
 8. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO TREE
 DISPOSITION CHART SHEET L-101:
 ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE A COMPLETE TREE SURVEY THAT
 INCLUDES ALL EXISTING TREES AND PALMS. COMPLETE ALL
 COLUMNS FOR MISSING INFORMATION.
 ? SATISFIED. LIST OFF SITE TREES AND PALMS AS OFF SITE.
 THESE WOULD REQUIRE A SEPARATE PERMIT FROM THE OWNER OF
 THAT PROPERTY FOR REMOVAL.
 ? SATISFIED. IF CANOPY DIAMETERS ARE 20 FEET OR MORE,
 CALCULATE THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE AND ENTER INTO THE
 MITIGATION DUE COLUMN IF PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL. IF UNDER
 20 FEET, THE SQUARE FOOTAGE IS BASED ON THE CATEGORY
 FOR THE TREE.
  
 ? SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN AND LIST THE CATEGORY 1, 2,
 3, OR 4 FOR EACH TREE AND PALM FROM THE CITY REFERENCE
 LIST.
  
 ? SATISFIED. REMOVE ?UNIDENTIFIED PALM? AND LIST THE
 SCIENTIFIC AND COMMON NAME, AS ALL TREES MUST BE
 PROPERLY IDENTIFIED.
 ? SATISFIED. CHANGE CANOPY AREA COLUMN TO CANOPY
 MITIGATION DUE, AND LIST SQUARE FOOTAGE IF MITIGATION
 IS DUE.
 ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF
 MITIGATION DUE AND SHOW MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE
 PROVIDED FROM THE PROPOSED TREE LIST AFTER ALL
 CORRECTIONS.
  
 ? SATISFIED. INCLUDE A LIST OF ALL SPECIES AND
 QUANTITIES COUNTED TOWARD MITIGATION BASED ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN, NOT INCLUDING REPLACEMENTS FOR MISSING
 APPROVED TREES AND PALMS.
  
  
 9. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES
 NATIVE TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE
 OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
 EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
 POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE CONDITION FOR ALL EXISTING
 TREES AND PALMS AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE
 TREES AND PALMS BASED ON A CERTIFIED ARBORISTS REPORT.
 THE FOLLOWING SABAL PALMS AND ROYAL PALMS ARE LISTED IN
 GOOD CONDITION ON THE ARBORIST REPORT YET ARE LISTED
 FOR REMOVAL. PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION. SABAL PALM NUMBER:
 43, 44, 45, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236,
 237, 238, 239, 240, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248,
 249, 250, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 264
 ROYAL PALM NUMBER: 146, 149, 151, 175, 176, 177, 193,
 195, 197, 201, 202, 218,219
  
  
 10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. BUFFER LENGTHS REQUIRE ONE
 TREE PER 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR EACH BUFFER
 LENGTH. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED BUFFER TREES
 IN A CHART WITH THE INDIVIDUAL BUFFER SECTIONS
 IDENTIFIED.
 PROVIDE THE BUFFER SECTIONS AND THE REQUIRED AND
 PROVIDED TREES FOR EACH SECTION FOR BOTH PARCELS. THERE
 WILL BE FOUR SECTIONS FOR EACH PARCEL WITH THE INTERIOR
 LOT LINES INDICATED AS NOT PROVIDED PER THE WAIVER
 REQUEST. SECTIONS CANNOT BE COMBINED.
  
 NOTE WITH LABEL REFERENCING SECTION 94-443(B)2 DOES NOT
 APPLY, AS THERE IS NO VEHICLE INGRESS OR EGRESS AT THE
 LOCATIONS ALONG I 95.
 EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEMENT ALONG WESTERN BUFFER MAY BE
 ABANDONED BY THE CITY IF NOT NEEDED, SO THIS AREA NEEDS
 TO COMPLY WITH THE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AND BE
 COORDINATED WITH THE ADJOINING PROPERTY AND THE CITY.
  
 11. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE FOUNDATION PLANTING
 CALCULATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR EACH BUILDING.
  
 12. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. REQUIRED TREES PER OPEN SPACE
 ARE NOT PROVIDED, THIS WOULD REQUIRE A WAIVER.
 THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE CALCULATION SHOULD BE 40
 PERCENT OF THE TOTAL PARCEL SQUARE FOOTAGE. CORRECT FOR
 EACH LOT AND RECALCULATE REQUIRED TREES, FLOWERING
 TREES AND SHRUBS.
  
 13. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF
 SUBSTITUTION OF PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES. SECTION
 94-442(D) REQUIRES A 3:1 RATIO FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR
 PALMS EXCEPT THE LISTED 1:1 SPECIES.
 COULD NOT LOCATE ON PLANS.
  
 14. NOT SATISFIED. ADD A SECTION IN THE LANDSCAPE DATA
 CHART TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A
 MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE
 FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED
 FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST
 RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT
 DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE
 THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT
 PLANTS BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST.
 COULD NOT LOCATE ON PLANS.
  
  
 15. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING
 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND REDESIGN THE LOCATIONS OF THE
 LIGHTING ON SHORTER POLES TO RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH
 TREES IN THE PARKING AREA LANDSCAPE ISLANDS.
  
 16. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL
 GROUND MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT.
 ALL THE LOCATIONS NEED TO BE IDENTIFIED IN SOME WAY.
  
 17. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL
 TRANSFORMERS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE
 CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
 ALL THE LOCATIONS NEED TO BE IDENTIFIED IN SOME WAY.
  
 18. NOT SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN TO THE PLANT LIST FOR
 DROUGHT TOLERANT LEVELS OF EACH SPECIES.
  
 ADD A COLUMN INSTEAD OF ADDING THE INFORMATION UNDER
 THE PLANT NAME.
  
 19. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. MINIMUM TREE SIZES ARE 12 FEET
 HEIGHT, CORRECT ON PLANT LIST.
  
 SILVER BUTTONWOOD TREES ARE REQUIRED AT 12 FEET HEIGHT.
 TREES ARE PROHIBITED FROM BEING TRIMMED INTO SHAPES AND
 MUST BE ALLOWED TO DEVELOP INTO THEIR MATURE SIZE TO
 FULFILL THE CODE REQUIREMENTS. PROVIDE REASON FOR
 SMALLER SIZES AND SPECIES BEING USED IN BUFFERS AND
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS.
  
 20. SATISFIED. THE OVERALL SCALE OF THE LANDSCAPE PLANS
 NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED AT A MINIMUM 1:20 SCALE TO MAKE IT
 POSSIBLE FOR THE DETAIL NEEDED FOR REVIEW. THE SCALE
 NEEDS TO BE CALLED OUT ON THE PLAN.
  
 21. SATISFIED. PROPOSED SUBDIVISION LINES NEED TO BE
 INCLUDED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND IDENTIFY ALL BUFFER
 SECTIONS AND INDICATE BUFFER PROVIDED OR NOT.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 3/18/21:
  
 22. PROVIDE DETAILED WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS SO
 STAFF DOES NOT HAVE TO SEARCH THE PLANS FOR THE
 CORRECTIONS.
 23. THE ROWS OF PARKING ALONG THE SOUTH BUFFER AND THE
 GAS AREA SHOULD HAVE THE CURB SHOWN AT THE 16 FOOT MARK
 INSTEAD OF WHEEL STOPS TO ALLOW MORE PERVIOUS AREA AS
 THE OVERHANG.
  
 24. CORRECT TREES #153 AND 154 ON THE TREE DISPOSITION
 PLAN TO MATCH THE ARBORIST EVALUATION.
  
 25. THE BUILDING UNDER THE GAS UMP CANOPY MUST SHOW THE
 30% FOUNDATION LANDSCAPING REQUIRED.
  
 26. ADD A NOTE TO THE PLAN THAT ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW PER CODE
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-09-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 12-09-2020 Time 15:41 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 12-09-2020 Time 15:41 Sent To  
Notes
2020-12-09 15:42:37FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: BJ?S AT BRANDSMART CPD Z20070016
 DECEMBER 9, 2020
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. DESIGN GUIDELINES:
 ? THE EXCEPTION TO THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER FOR WATER
 BODIES OR I-95 IS NOT SUPPORTED BY STAFF. THE PERIMETER
 OF THE BRANDSMART PD MUST HAVE THE REQUIRED BUFFER AS
 STATED.
 ? BUFFERS MAY BE ADJUSTED TO AVOID UTILITY EASEMENT
 OVERLAP THAT WOULD PREVENT THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING
 FROM BEING ALLOWED. THIS IS REINFORCED BY THE EASEMENT
 REQUIREMENT NOT BEING ALLOWED TO COUNT TOWARD BUFFER
 REQUIREMENT.
 ? ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS MUST MEET ALL THE REQUIREMENTS
 OF ARTICLE XIV ?LANDSCAPING, LAND CLEARING, TREE
 PROTECTION AND ARTIFICIAL TURF?.
 ? ALL BUILDINGS MODIFIED OR ADDED MUST MEET THE 30
 PERCENT LINEAR FOOTAGE REQUIREMENT FOR FOUNDATION
 LANDSCAPING.
  
 2. WAIVER REQUESTS.
 ? #1 SHOULD READ: PROPOSED -WAIVE THE FIVE FOOT BUFFER
 REQUIREMENT FOR INTERIOR LOT LINES.
 ? #5 UP TO18 PARKING SPACES IN A ROW FOR NEW PARKING
 AREAS WOULD HAVE TO PROVIDE TREE CANOPY IN SOME OTHER
 WAY TO MEET THE INTENT OF 94-443(C). OPTIONS ARE
 CURRENTLY AVAILABLE IN THE CODE TO ALLOW UP TO 12
 SPACES IN A ROW BY EXPANDING THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS.
 THERE IS ALSO AN OPTION TO ELIMINATE PERIMETER
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS BY PROVIDING ALTERNATIVE AREAS FOR
 TREE CANOPY.
  
  
 3. A WAIVER FOR SECTION 94-243, TABLE VII-3 COMMERCIAL
 DISTRICTS REGULATIONS REGARDING OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS
 WOULD HAVE TO BE INCLUDED IF 40% OPEN SPACE MINIMUM ON
 INDIVIDUAL LOTS IS NOT MET AS THEY ARE DEVELOPED, AS
 THE MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE AREA IS 60%. OPEN SPACE BY
 CODE DEFINITION INCLUDES ALL AREAS THAT ARE UNENCLOSED.
 THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPING IS 15%, AND EACH LOT SHOULD BE
 ABLE TO MEET THIS REQUIREMENT.
  
 4. PROVIDE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWING EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE FOR THE LINEAR PARK AREA. THE
 LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS ARE TO BE UPGRADES FOR THE
 EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO JUSTIFY REDUCTIONS IN LANDSCAPE
 IN OTHER AREAS, SO THIS NEEDS TO BE QUANTIFIED. THE
 ACTUAL AREA IS PROPOSED TO BE REDUCED BY THE ADDITION
 OF PARKING.
  
  
 5. SECTION 94-443 (C)(3)A. REQUIRES A TERMINAL
 LANDSCAPE ISLAND AND REQUIRED TREE FOR EACH ROW OF
 PARKING. (3)B. REQUIRES AN INTERIOR LANDSCAPE ISLAND
 WITH A REQUIRED TREE SO THERE ARE NO MORE THAN 10
 SPACES IN A ROW. ALL THESE LANDSCAPE AREAS MUST MEET
 THE MINIMUM WIDTH OF 8 FEET OF LANDSCAPE AREA AND BE
 THE FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT SPACE. (3) C. REQUIRES
 DIVIDER MEDIANS WHERE THERE ARE MORE THAN 3 CONSECUTIVE
 ROWS OF PARKING. ALL RECONSTRUCTED AREAS OF PARKING
 MUST MEET THESE REQUIREMENTS, AND THE APPROVED PLAN
 FOLLOWED FOR UNALTERED AREAS.
  
 6. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A MINIMUM OF 75
 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED
 WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING AREA SHALL
 BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE OF
 CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE
 AREAS AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 94-443(C)(3) FOR DIVIDER
 ISLANDS, TERMINAL, AND INTERIOR ISLANDS.
  
 7. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING LANDSCAPE AREAS
 COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-443(C)(3) AND
 (4) AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS. PROVIDE THE TOTAL
 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED AS ONE TOTAL FOR BOTH SECTIONS. A
 SEPARATE EXHIBIT MUST BE PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE THE
 AREAS COUNTED.
  
  
 8. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO TREE
 DISPOSITION CHART SHEET L-101:
 ? PROVIDE A COMPLETE TREE SURVEY THAT INCLUDES ALL
 EXISTING TREES AND PALMS. COMPLETE ALL COLUMNS FOR
 MISSING INFORMATION.
 ? LIST OFF SITE TREES AND PALMS AS OFF SITE. THESE
 WOULD REQUIRE A SEPARATE PERMIT FROM THE OWNER OF THAT
 PROPERTY FOR REMOVAL.
 ? IF CANOPY DIAMETERS ARE 20 FEET OR MORE, CALCULATE
 THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE AND ENTER INTO THE MITIGATION
 DUE COLUMN IF PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL. IF UNDER 20 FEET,
 THE SQUARE FOOTAGE IS BASED ON THE CATEGORY FOR THE
 TREE.
  
 ? ADD A COLUMN AND LIST THE CATEGORY 1, 2, 3, OR 4 FOR
 EACH TREE AND PALM FROM THE CITY REFERENCE LIST.
  
 ? REMOVE ?UNIDENTIFIED PALM? AND LIST THE SCIENTIFIC
 AND COMMON NAME, AS ALL TREES MUST BE PROPERLY
 IDENTIFIED.
 ? CHANGE CANOPY AREA COLUMN TO CANOPY MITIGATION DUE,
 AND LIST SQUARE FOOTAGE IF MITIGATION IS DUE.
 ? PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF MITIGATION DUE
 AND SHOW MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED FROM THE
 PROPOSED TREE LIST AFTER ALL CORRECTIONS.
  
 ? INCLUDE A LIST OF ALL SPECIES AND QUANTITIES COUNTED
 TOWARD MITIGATION BASED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, NOT
 INCLUDING REPLACEMENTS FOR MISSING APPROVED TREES AND
 PALMS.
  
  
 9. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES IN GOOD
 CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A
 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY
 RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION.
 PROVIDE CONDITION FOR ALL EXISTING TREES AND PALMS AND
 RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS
 BASED ON A CERTIFIED ARBORISTS REPORT.
  
 10. BUFFER LENGTHS REQUIRE ONE TREE PER 30 FEET OR
 PORTION THEREOF FOR EACH BUFFER LENGTH. PROVIDE THE
 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED BUFFER TREES IN A CHART WITH THE
 INDIVIDUAL BUFFER SECTIONS IDENTIFIED.
  
 11. PROVIDE THE FOUNDATION PLANTING CALCULATION
 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR EACH BUILDING.
  
 12. REQUIRED TREES PER OPEN SPACE ARE NOT PROVIDED,
 THIS WOULD REQUIRE A WAIVER.
  
 13. PROVIDE THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF SUBSTITUTION
 OF PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES. SECTION 94-442(D) REQUIRES
 A 3:1 RATIO FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR PALMS EXCEPT THE
 LISTED 1:1 SPECIES.
  
 14. ADD A SECTION IN THE LANDSCAPE DATA CHART TO COMPLY
 WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60
 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE
 OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST
 OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF
 SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF
 NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS BASED ON FINAL PLANT
 LIST.
  
 15. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN AND REDESIGN THE LOCATIONS OF THE
 LIGHTING ON SHORTER POLES TO RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH
 TREES IN THE PARKING AREA LANDSCAPE ISLANDS.
  
 16. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED VALVES AND
 EQUIPMENT.
  
 17. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
  
 18. ADD A COLUMN TO THE PLANT LIST FOR DROUGHT TOLERANT
 LEVELS OF EACH SPECIES.
  
 19. MINIMUM TREE SIZES ARE 12 FEET HEIGHT, CORRECT ON
 PLANT LIST.
  
 20. THE OVERALL SCALE OF THE LANDSCAPE PLANS NEEDS TO
 BE PROVIDED AT A MINIMUM 1:20 SCALE TO MAKE IT POSSIBLE
 FOR THE DETAIL NEEDED FOR REVIEW. THE SCALE NEEDS TO BE
 CALLED OUT ON THE PLAN.
  
 21. PROPOSED SUBDIVISION LINES NEED TO BE INCLUDED ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, AND IDENTIFY ALL BUFFER SECTIONS
 AND INDICATE BUFFER PROVIDED OR NOT.
  
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 2 Status P Date 02-24-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 02-24-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 02-24-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-02-24 16:25:10NO FURTHER COMMENTS FROM DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
  
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-30-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 11-30-2020 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 11-30-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-11-30 09:33:18PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:
 1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID
 WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE AND TYPE OF
 THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR) THAT WILL BE
 UTILIZED THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION
 SERVICE.
 2- DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR ENCLOSURE DETAIL. FOR A
 FREESTANDING SITE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, THE ENCLOSURE
 SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST REVISION OF CITY OF WEST
 PALM BEACH GENERAL CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE
 STANDARD, GC-7.
 3- AUTO TURN (DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE TIRES PATH) FOR
 THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER TRUCK WITH THE
 FOLLOWING SPECS:
 - TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT
 - TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT
 - TURNING RADIUS:
 - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT
 - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT
 - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 4 Status P Date 07-07-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 07-07-2021 Time 15:07 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 07-07-2021 Time 15:07 Sent To  
Notes
2021-07-07 15:07:21THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 6/18/2021 SUBMITTAL. ONLY COMMENT #2 CAN POSSIBLY
 AFFECT THE SITE PLAN.
  
 1. [NOT SATISFIED] THIS COMMENT CAN BE ADDRESSED DURING
 ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. SFWMD APPEARS TO HAVE
 STOMRWATER AS-BUILT DRAWINGS ON ITS WEBSITE FOR THE ERP
 PERMIT FOR EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE. PREVIOUS COMMENT: ON
 THE DRAINAGE PLAN, PROVIDE PIPE SIZES AND PIPE MATERIAL
 FOR EXISTING STORM PIPES, SEWER MAINS, FORCE MAINS AND
 WATER MAINS. {ADDITIONAL COMMENT: NOT ALL EXISTING
 UTILITIES ARE LABELED INCLUDING WITHIN THE EXECUTIVE
 CENTER DRIVE R/W.]
  
 2. [NOT SATISFIED] THIS CAN BE ADDRESSED DURING
 ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL PROVIDED THE SOLUTION DOES
 NOT AFFECT THE STORMWATER DETENION AREAS. THIS COMMENT
 WAS DISCUSSED WITH THE EOR. HE WILL MODIFY THE END
 TREATMENT OF THE PIPE AT THE SOUTH END OF THE SOUTH
 STORMWATER DETENTION AREA, LIKELY WITH A MITERED END
 SECTION. THE PROPOSED GRATE ELEVATION (13.00) OF THE
 CONFLICT STRUCTURE IS SHOWN TO BE LOWER THAN THE
 INTERMEDIATE CONTOIUR ELEVATION (13.5 FEET) OVER THE
 SANITARY SEWER PIPE AT THE NORTH END OF THE NORTH
 DETENTION AREA. NOTE(S) SHOULD BE ADDED TO THE PLANS TO
 RESTRICT HEAVY EQUIPMEINT OVER UTILITY PIPES WITH
 INSUFFICIENT COVER DEPTH TO PROTECT THE PIPES FROM THE
 WEIGHT OF THE EQUIPEMENT. PREVIOUS COMMENT: CHECK PIPE
 COVER FOR PIPES WITHIN THE PROPOSED DRY DETENTION
 AREAS. [ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: FOR EXAMPLE, THE SANITARY
 SEWER PIPE LEAVING PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE NUMBER 1 WILL
 HAVE A TOP OF PIPE ELEVATION AROUND 12.4 FT NAVD AND
 THE CONFLICT MANHOLE TO THE EAST WILL BE CONVERTED TO A
 CATCH BASIN WITH PROPOSED GRATE ELEVATION OF 13.00 FT
 NAVD WITHIN THE PROPOSED DETENTION AREA. FOR ANOTHER
 EXAMPLE, THE PROPOSED BOTTOM ELEVATION OF THE DETENTION
 AREA IS 10.50 FT NAVD. THE EXISTING CATCH BASIN TO THE
 SOUTHWEST OF THE G-G SECTION LABEL ON SHEET C402.0 WILL
 BE MODIFIED TO HAVE A GRATE ELEVATION OF 12.50 FT NAVD.
 THE INVERT ELEVATION OF THE SOUTH PIPE IS 9.41 FT NAVD.
 ASSUMING THE PIPE IS 12 INCHES IN DIAMETER, THE TOP OF
 PIPE ELEVATION WILL BE 10.5?+/- NAVD, THE SAME
 ELEVATION AS THE BOTTOM OF THE PROPOSED DETENTION
 AREA.]
  
 3. [SATISFIED] REVIEW GRATE ELEVATION OF 14.80 FT NAVD
 FOR CATCH BASIN LOCATED IN NORTH DRIVEWAY. DRIVEWAY
 CROSS SLOPE WOULD BE AROUND 3.5% AND LONGITUDINAL SLOPE
 AROUND 2%. CONSIDER FLUME INTO THE DRY DETENTION AREA
 INSTEAD OF THIS CATCH BASIN. SHEET C401.0 LISTS THE RIM
 ELEVATION AS 14.80 FT NAVD AND SHEET C402.0 PROVIDES A
 PROPOSED SPOT GRADE OF 15.05 FT NAVD AT THE CATCH
 BASIN.
  
 4. [SATISFIED] THE STORM PIPE FROM BEST BUY IS SHOWN AS
 A SANITARY PIPE AND MAY NOT BE SHOWN IN THE CORRECT
 LOCATION. THE PIPE FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BEST
 BUY IS LIKELY IN THE 12 FT DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND EITHER
 CONNECTS TO THE MANHOLE IN THE DRIVEWAY OR CONTINUES
 EAST TO THE DITCH ON THE OTHER SIDE OF EXECUTIVE CENTER
 DRIVE. PLEASE VERIFY.
  
 5. [SATISFIED] THE STORM PIPE FROM THE CENTER OF
 EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE CONNECTS TO THE MANHOLE IN THE
 NORTH DRIVEWAY INSTEAD OF THE OFFSITE CATCH BASIN.
  
 6. [SATISFIED] PLEASE EXPLAIN THE PURPOSE OF THE WEIR
 IN THE PROPOSED CONTROL STRUCTURE IF THE ELEVATED CATCH
 BASINS IN THE PROPOSED DETENTION AREA ARE DESIGNED TO
 PROVIDE THE PRE-TREATMENT STORAGE VOLUME. ALSO EXPLAIN
 HOW THE DETENTION AREAS WILL PROVIDE TREATMENT WITH AN
 PVC LINER.
  
 7. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE CROSS SECTION OF ROAD WIDENING
 (RIGHT TURN LANE). [ADDITIONAL COMMENT: PROVIDE RANGE
 OF PAVEMENT CROSS SLOPE ON THE CROSS SECTION.]
  
 8. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE SPOT GRADES FOR NEW RIGHT TURN
 LANE AND AT DRIVEWAYS. {ADDITIONAL COMMENT: PROV IDE
 ADDITIONAL GRADING FOR SIDEWALK AND DRIVEWAY APRON TO
 SHOW HOW BACK OF SIDEWALK ELEVATION OF 15.85 FT NAVD AT
 THE DRIVEWAY WILL CONNECT TO THE EXISTING EP ELEVATION
 OF 14.12 FT NAVD IN THE STREET.]
  
  
 9. [SATISFIED] DRY DETENTION AREA IS NOT DEPICTED ON
 THE WATER MAIN PROFILE OR FORCE MAIN PROFILE ON SHEET
 C503.0.
  
 10. [SATISFIED] 6? WATER MAIN TO THE FIRE HYDRANT
 LABELED AS 10? WATER MAIN ON THE FORCE MAIN PROFILE.
  
 11. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM CONVERSION
 EQUATION ON THE SURVEY. [ADDITIONAL COMMENT: NAVD TO
 NGVD CONVERSION IS LISTED AS +1.555 FEET ON THE SURVEY
 AND +1.532 FEET ON THE CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANS.]
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
 12. PROVIDE INLET PROTECTION FOR ALL CATCH BASINS AND
 INLETS ON EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE ALONG THE FRONTAGE OF
 THE PROJECT AND IMMEDIATELY NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE
 PROJECT. [CAN BE ADDRESSED DURING ENGINEERING PERMIT
 SUBMITTAL]
  
 13. [SATISFIED] SILT FENCE WILL BE NEEDED ALONG THE
 WEST PROPERTY LINE. [CAN BE ADDRESSED DURING
 ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL]
  
 14. [NOT SATISFIED] CAN BE ADDRESSED DURING ENGINEERING
 PERMIT SUBMITTAL. ENGINEER SHOULD PROVIDE PRE- AND
 POST- SPREAD CALCULAITONS AT THE CURB LINE DOWNSTREAM
 OF THE RIGHT TURN LANES/DRIVEWAYS. ADDITIONAL CATCH
 BASIN(S) MAY BE NEEDED WITHIN THE RIGHT TURN LANE
 WIDENING. PREVIOUS COMMENT: CHECK THE CHANGE IN SPREAD
 OF RUNOFF AT THE SOUTH END OF THE PROPOSED RIGHT TURN
 LANE AT THE PT OF THE CURB AND GUTTER (I.E. AT THE EDGE
 OF TRAVEL LANE SOUTH OF THE DRIVEWAY). [CAN BE
 ADDRESSED DURING ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL).
  
 TRACY WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 [email protected]
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 3 Status F Date 06-09-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 06-09-2021 Time 07:15 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 06-09-2021 Time 07:15 Sent To  
Notes
2021-06-09 07:15:22THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 5/18/2021 SUBMITTAL:
  
 1. [NOT SATISFIED] ON THE DRAINAGE PLAN, PROVIDE PIPE
 SIZES AND PIPE MATERIAL FOR EXISTING STORM PIPES, SEWER
 MAINS, FORCE MAINS AND WATER MAINS. {ADDITIONAL
 COMMENT: NOT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES ARE LABELED
 INCLUDING WITHIN THE EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE R/W.]
  
 2. [NOT SATISFIED] CHECK PIPE COVER FOR PIPES WITHIN
 THE PROPOSED DRY DETENTION AREAS. [ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
 FOR EXAMPLE, THE SANITARY SEWER PIPE LEAVING PROPOSED
 SEWER MANHOLE NUMBER 1 WILL HAVE A TOP OF PIPE
 ELEVATION AROUND 12.4 FT NAVD AND THE CONFLICT MANHOLE
 TO THE EAST WILL BE CONVERTED TO A CATCH BASIN WITH
 PROPOSED GRATE ELEVATION OF 13.00 FT NAVD WITHIN THE
 PROPOSED DETENTION AREA. FOR ANOTHER EXAMPLE, THE
 PROPOSED BOTTOM ELEVATION OF THE DETENTION AREA IS
 10.50 FT NAVD. THE EXISTING CATCH BASIN TO THE
 SOUTHWEST OF THE G-G SECTION LABEL ON SHEET C402.0 WILL
 BE MODIFIED TO HAVE A GRATE ELEVATION OF 12.50 FT NAVD.
 THE INVERT ELEVATION OF THE SOUTH PIPE IS 9.41 FT NAVD.
 ASSUMING THE PIPE IS 12? IN DIAMETER, THE TOP OF PIPE
 ELEVATION WILL BE 10.5?+/- NAVD, THE SAME ELEVATION AS
 THE BOTTOM OF THE PROPOSED DETENTION AREA.]
  
 3. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] REVIEW GRATE ELEVATION OF
 14.80 FT NAVD FOR CATCH BASIN LOCATED IN NORTH
 DRIVEWAY. DRIVEWAY CROSS SLOPE WOULD BE AROUND 3.5% AND
 LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AROUND 2%. CONSIDER FLUME INTO THE
 DRY DETENTION AREA INSTEAD OF THIS CATCH BASIN. SHEET
 C401.0 LISTS THE RIM ELEVATION AS 14.80 FT NAVD AND
 SHEET C402.0 PROVIDES A PROPOSED SPOT GRADE OF 15.05 FT
 NAVD AT THE CATCH BASIN.
  
 4. [SATISFIED] THE STORM PIPE FROM BEST BUY IS SHOWN AS
 A SANITARY PIPE AND MAY NOT BE SHOWN IN THE CORRECT
 LOCATION. THE PIPE FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BEST
 BUY IS LIKELY IN THE 12 FT DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND EITHER
 CONNECTS TO THE MANHOLE IN THE DRIVEWAY OR CONTINUES
 EAST TO THE DITCH ON THE OTHER SIDE OF EXECUTIVE CENTER
 DRIVE. PLEASE VERIFY.
  
 5. [SATISFIED] THE STORM PIPE FROM THE CENTER OF
 EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE CONNECTS TO THE MANHOLE IN THE
 NORTH DRIVEWAY INSTEAD OF THE OFFSITE CATCH BASIN.
  
 6. [REVISED COMMENT] PLEASE EXPLAIN THE PURPOSE OF THE
 WEIR IN THE PROPOSED CONTROL STRUCTURE IF THE ELEVATED
 CATCH BASINS IN THE PROPOSED DETENTION AREA ARE
 DESIGNED TO PROVIDE THE PRE-TREATMENT STORAGE VOLUME.
 ALSO EXPLAIN HOW THE DETENTION AREAS WILL PROVIDE
 TREATMENT WITH AN PVC LINER.
  
 7. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] PROVIDE CROSS SECTION OF ROAD
 WIDENING (RIGHT TURN LANE). [ADDITIONAL COMMENT:
 PROVIDE RANGE OF PAVEMENT CROSS SLOPE ON THE CROSS
 SECTION.]
  
 8. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] PROVIDE SPOT GRADES FOR NEW
 RIGHT TURN LANE AND AT DRIVEWAYS. {ADDITIONAL COMMENT:
 PROV IDE ADDITIONAL GRADING FOR SIDEWALK AND DRIVEWAY
 APRON TO SHOW HOW BACK OF SIDEWALK ELEVATION OF 15.85
 FT NAVD AT THE DRIVEWAY WILL CONNECT TO THE EXISTING EP
 ELEVATION OF 14.12 FT NAVD IN THE STREET.]
  
  
 9. [SATISFIED] DRY DETENTION AREA IS NOT DEPICTED ON
 THE WATER MAIN PROFILE OR FORCE MAIN PROFILE ON SHEET
 C503.0.
  
 10. [SATISFIED] 6? WATER MAIN TO THE FIRE HYDRANT
 LABELED AS 10? WATER MAIN ON THE FORCE MAIN PROFILE.
  
 11. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM
 CONVERSION EQUATION ON THE SURVEY. [ADDITIONAL COMMENT:
 NAVD TO NGVD CONVERSION IS LISTED AS +1.555 FEET ON THE
 SURVEY AND +1.532 FEET ON THE CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANS.]
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
 12. PROVIDE INLET PROTECTION FOR ALL CATCH BASINS AND
 INLETS ON EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE ALONG THE FRONTAGE OF
 THE PROJECT AND IMMEDIATELY NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE
 PROJECT. [CAN BE ADDRESSED DURING ENGINEERING PERMIT
 SUBMITTAL]
  
 13. SILT FENCE WILL BE NEEDED ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY
 LINE. [CAN BE ADDRESSED DURING ENGINEERING PERMIT
 SUBMITTAL]
  
 14. CHECK THE CHANGE IN SPREAD OF RUNOFF AT THE SOUTH
 END OF THE PROPOSED RIGHT TURN LANE AT THE PT OF THE
 CURB AND GUTTER (I.E. AT THE EDGE OF TRAVEL LANE SOUTH
 OF THE DRIVEWAY). [CAN BE ADDRESSED DURING ENGINEERING
 PERMIT SUBMITTAL).
  
 TRACY WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 [email protected]
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status F Date 03-17-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 03-17-2021 Time 02:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 03-17-2021 Time 02:46 Sent To  
Notes
2021-03-17 02:46:04THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 2/24/2021 SUBMITTAL:
  
 1. ON THE DRAINAGE PLAN, PROVIDE PIPE SIZES AND PIPE
 MATERIAL FOR EXISTING STORM PIPES, SEWER MAINS, FORCE
 MAINS AND WATER MAINS.
  
 2. CHECK PIPE COVER FOR PIPES WITHIN THE PROPOSED DRY
 DETENTION AREAS.
  
 3. REVIEW GRATE ELEVATION OF 14.80? NAVD FOR CATCH
 BASIN LOCATED IN NORTH DRIVEWAY. DRIVEWAY CROSS SLOPE
 WOULD BE AROUND 3.5% AND LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AROUND 2%.
 CONSIDER FLUME INTO THE DRY DETENTION AREA INSTEAD OF
 THIS CATCH BASIN.
  
 4. THE STORM PIPE FROM BEST BUY IS SHOWN AS A SANITARY
 PIPE AND MAY NOT BE SHOWN IN THE CORRECT LOCATION. THE
 PIPE FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BEST BUY IS LIKELY IN
 THE 12? DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND EITHER CONNECTS TO THE
 MANHOLE IN THE DRIVEWAY OR CONTINUES EAST TO THE DITCH
 ON THE OTHER SIDE OF EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE. PLEASE
 VERIFY.
  
 5. THE STORM PIPE FROM THE CENTER OF EXECUTIVE CENTER
 DRIVE CONNECTS TO THE MANHOLE IN THE NORTH DRIVEWAY
 INSTEAD OF THE OFFSITE CATCH BASIN.
  
 6. WEIR ELEVATION OF 9.55? NAVD IN THE PROPOSED CONTROL
 STRUCTURE APPEARS LOW BASED ON THE DRY DETENTION POND
 ELEVATION OF 10.50? NAVD.
  
 7. PROVIDE CROSS SECTION OF ROAD WIDENING (RIGHT TURN
 LANE).
  
 8. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES FOR NEW RIGHT TURN LANE AND AT
 DRIVEWAYS.
  
 9. DRY DETENTION AREA IS NOT DEPICTED ON THE WATER MAIN
 PROFILE OR FORCE MAIN PROFILE ON SHEET C503.0.
  
 10. 6? WATER MAIN TO THE FIRE HYDRANT LABELED AS 10?
 WATER MAIN ON THE FORCE MAIN PROFILE.
  
 11. PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM CONVERSION EQUATION ON THE
 SURVEY.
  
 TRACY WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 [email protected]
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-10-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 12-10-2020 Time 12:15 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 12-10-2020 Time 12:23 Sent To  
Notes
2020-12-10 12:16:08THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. THE CITY'S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD1929. THE
 SURVEY USES NAVD1988. THE CITY HAS ALLOWED NAVD1988
 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION BETWEEN NAVD1988 AND NGVD1929
 IS LISTED. LABEL THE VERTICAL DATUM AND CONVERSION
 EQUATION ON SHEET C101.0
  
 2. CONSIDER REDUCING THE PARKING STALL DEPTH AND
 PROVIDING 2' PERVIOUS OVERHANG FOR THE PARKING SPACES
 FACING THE NORTHEAST SIDE OF THE BRANDSMART BUILDING.
  
 3. WHAT IS THE ELEVATION OF THE EXISTING LINING UNDER
 THE DRY DETENTION AREA?
  
 4. HOW WILL THE LINER UNDER THE DRY DETENTION AREA
 WHERE THE FUEL STATION IS PROPOSED BE ADJUSTED?
  
 5. DRAINAGE EASEMENTS WILL BE NEEDED FOR EACH PROPERTY
 TO DRAIN TO THE DRY DETENTION AREA AND TO DRAIN TO THE
 CONTROL STRUCTURE AND DISCHARGE OFFSITE.
  
 6. SITE MAY CONTAIN SOIL CONTAMINATION FROM PAST USE AS
 A GOLF COURSE.
  
 7. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET
 SFWMD ERP CRITERIA.
  
 8. INDICATE IF THE BEST BUY PARCEL DRAINAGE SYSTEM
 DRAINS ONTO THE SITE.
  
 9. CORRECT THE PLAN SHEET REFERENCE FOR SECTION C-C ON
 SHEET C404.0.
  
 10. PROVIDE ADA CURB RAMPS MEETING CURRENT ADA CRITERIA
 FOR ALL SIDEWALK CONNECTIONS TO DRIVEWAYS.
  
 11. PROVIDE TYPICAL SECTION BETWEEN EDGE OF PAVEMENT OF
 EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE AND FACE OF BJ'S BUILDING
 SHOWING DIMENSIONS AND GROUND SLOPES.
  
 12. PROVIDE TYPICAL SECTION BETWEEN I-95 RIGHT OF WAY
 AND FACE OF BJ'S BUILDING SHOWING DIMENSIONS OF
 PARKING/DRIVE AISLES, SIDEWALKS, LANDSCAPE ISLANDS,
 ETC. AND GROUND SLOPES.
  
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
  
 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED
 WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP MODIFICATION AND
 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 07-20-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 07-20-2021 Time 07:12 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-07-20 07:14:46CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
  
 PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT, NEED SKETCH AND LEGAL FOR
 PROPOSED DRAINAGE EASEMENT.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 06-23-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 06-23-2021 Time 08:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-06-23 08:58:051. SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS REQUIRED FOR THAT
 PORTION OF NEW DRAINAGE EASEMENT THAT FALLS WITHIN THE
 BJ'S PROPERTY.
 2. IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED AFTER DISCUSSION WITH LAW
 DEPT. THAT A SIGN-OFF FROM BEST BUY WILL NOT BE
 REQUIRED.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 03-15-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 03-15-2021 Time 08:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-03-15 09:03:46PASSED WITH CONDITIONS:
  
 1. REPLAT PRIOR TO ANY C.O.
 2. REVIEW OF CROSS ACCESS, DRAINAGE, ETC. AGREEMENT.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-07-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 12-07-2020 Time 08:26 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-12-07 08:53:071. NO SURVEY PROVIDED.
 2. IT APPEARS THAT THE EXISTING CANAL ALONG THE NORTH
 PROPERTY LINE IS TO BE FILLED IN.THERE MAY BE DRAINAGE
 FROM PROPERTIES ON THE NORTH. SHOW AND LABEL ALL
 EXISTING DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS.
 3. REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED.
 4. CROSS ACCESS, UTILITY, DRAINAGE AND PARKING
 AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 5 Status P Date 07-15-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 07-14-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-07-14 19:22:42APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:
 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CO, THE APPLICANT WILL USE BEST
 EFFORTS TO WORK WITH PALM BEACH COUNTY TO IMPLEMENT
 RESTRIPING ON THE NORTHBOUND APPROACH (SOUTH LEG) OF
 THE INTERSECTION OF PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD &
 EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE TO ALLOW FOR: 2 LEFT TURN LANES
 + 1 SHARED THROUGH/RIGHT LANE AND THE ASSOCIATED SIGNAL
 MODIFICATIONS THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE
 THIS RESTRIPING. IF, HOWEVER, THE COUNTY ULTIMATELY
 DETERMINES THAT THE ASSOCIATED SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS
 CANNOT BE IMPLEMENTED WHILE UTILIZING THE EXISTING
 CONCRETE STRAIN POLES AT THE INTERSECTION, THIS
 IMPROVEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. INSTEAD, THE
 APPLICANT WILL PROVIDE STRIPING TO MAXIMIZE THE
 NORTHBOUND LEFT TURN STORAGE LENGTH TO THE EXTENT
 PRACTICAL AND CONTRIBUTE $150,000 TOWARDSA CITY
 DESIGNATED TRANSPORTATION FUND.
  
 TRAFFIC COMMENTS:
 1. SATISFIED. PER TPS RECOMMENDATION, IMPROVE NB
 LEFT-TURN QUEUE CAPACITY ALONG EXECUTIVE CENTER DR AT
 THE PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD INTERSECTION. UPDATED TRAFFIC
 ANALYSIS WAS NOT PROVIDED IN THE LATEST RESUBMISSION.
 THE PARKING ANALYSIS DOES NOT ADDRESS THIS COMMENT.
 2. SATISFIED. UNLESS THE COUNTY APPROVES AND AGREES TO
 IMPLEMENT THE OPTIMIZED SIGNAL TIMING AT THE EXECUTIVE
 DR AND PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD INTERSECTION AS PRESENTED
 IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY, A LANE RECONFIGURATION OF THE NB
 APPROACH IS NECESSARY. SPECIFICALLY: CONVERT THE
 EXISTING 1 LEFT-TURN LANE, 1 THROUGH LANE, 1 RIGHT-TURN
 LANE TO 2 LEFT-TURN LANES AND 1 THROUGH/RIGHT LANE.
 3. SATISFIED. PER TPS RECOMMENDATION, CONSTRUCT
 RIGHT-TURN DECELERATION LANES AT DRIVEWAY #2 AND #3.
 PROVIDE PROPER LEFT-TURN CHANNELIZATION TO DRIVEWAY #2
 AND #3 BY MEANS OF EITHER STRIPING OR MID-BLOCK
 ISLANDS. UPDATED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS WAS NOT PROVIDED IN
 THE LATEST RESUBMISSION. THE PARKING ANALYSIS DOES NOT
 ADDRESS THIS COMMENT.
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE AND
 LARGE DELIVERY TRUCK OPERATIONS WITHIN THE FACILITY
 A. THE WB-67 ANALYSIS SHOWS AN ENCROACHMENT WITH THE
 LEFT SIDE CURB IN THE SOUTH-EAST PORTION OF THE LOT
 WHILE TURNING LEFT TOWARDS THE EXIT DRIVEWAY
 B. GARBAGE TRUCK ANALYSIS SEEMS MISSING
 5. SATISFIED. PERTAINING THE PARKING STUDY. PROVIDE
 PARKING DEMAND VALUES BASED ON ITE PARKING GENERATION
 MANUAL 5TH EDITION AND COMPARE THEM WITH THE STUDY
 ESTIMATE. PLEASE ELABORATE AND JUSTIFY THE RESULTS.
  
 SITE COMMENTS:
 6. SATISFIED. EXTEND THE WIDER SIDEWALK CONFIGURATION
 ALONG THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE NORTH OF DRIVEWAY #2.
 PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SET NAME/NUMBER SHOWCASING SIDEWALK
 DIMENSIONS
 7. SATISFIED. CONSIDER IMPLEMENTING A MULTIMODAL PATH
 ALONG SITE FRONTAGE OR CONFIGURE EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
 ROAD GEOMETRY TO MIMIC THE PORTION SOUTH OF CONGRESS
 AVE. PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SET NAME/NUMBER SHOWCASING
 SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS ALONG PROPERTY FRONTAGE. PROVIDE
 PROPOSED SIDEWALK EXACT WIDTH DIMENSIONS IN THE COMMENT
 RESPONSE.
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 07-06-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 07-06-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 06-10-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 06-10-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-06-10 01:36:39TRAFFIC COMMENTS:
 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PER TPS RECOMMENDATION, IMPROVE
 NB LEFT-TURN QUEUE CAPACITY ALONG EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
 AT THE PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD INTERSECTION. UPDATED
 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS WAS NOT PROVIDED IN THE LATEST
 RESUBMISSION. THE PARKING ANALYSIS DOES NOT ADDRESS
 THIS COMMENT.
 2. UNLESS THE COUNTY APPROVES AND AGREES TO IMPLEMENT
 THE OPTIMIZED SIGNAL TIMING AT THE EXECUTIVE DR AND
 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD INTERSECTION AS PRESENTED IN THE
 TRAFFIC STUDY, A LANE RECONFIGURATION OF THE NB
 APPROACH IS NECESSARY. SPECIFICALLY: CONVERT THE
 EXISTING 1 LEFT-TURN LANE, 1 THROUGH LANE, 1 RIGHT-TURN
 LANE TO 2 LEFT-TURN LANES AND 1 THROUGH/RIGHT LANE.
 3. SATISFIED. PER TPS RECOMMENDATION, CONSTRUCT
 RIGHT-TURN DECELERATION LANES AT DRIVEWAY #2 AND #3.
 PROVIDE PROPER LEFT-TURN CHANNELIZATION TO DRIVEWAY #2
 AND #3 BY MEANS OF EITHER STRIPING OR MID-BLOCK
 ISLANDS. UPDATED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS WAS NOT PROVIDED IN
 THE LATEST RESUBMISSION. THE PARKING ANALYSIS DOES NOT
 ADDRESS THIS COMMENT.
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE AND
 LARGE DELIVERY TRUCK OPERATIONS WITHIN THE FACILITY
 A. THE WB-67 ANALYSIS SHOWS AN ENCROACHMENT WITH THE
 LEFT SIDE CURB IN THE SOUTH-EAST PORTION OF THE LOT
 WHILE TURNING LEFT TOWARDS THE EXIT DRIVEWAY
 B. GARBAGE TRUCK ANALYSIS SEEMS MISSING
 5. SATISFIED. PERTAINING THE PARKING STUDY. PROVIDE
 PARKING DEMAND VALUES BASED ON ITE PARKING GENERATION
 MANUAL 5TH EDITION AND COMPARE THEM WITH THE STUDY
 ESTIMATE. PLEASE ELABORATE AND JUSTIFY THE RESULTS.
 SITE COMMENTS:
 6. SATISFIED. EXTEND THE WIDER SIDEWALK CONFIGURATION
 ALONG THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE NORTH OF DRIVEWAY #2.
 PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SET NAME/NUMBER SHOWCASING SIDEWALK
 DIMENSIONS
 7. SATISFIED. CONSIDER IMPLEMENTING A MULTIMODAL PATH
 ALONG SITE FRONTAGE OR CONFIGURE EXECUTIVE CENTER DR
 ROAD GEOMETRY TO MIMIC THE PORTION SOUTH OF CONGRESS
 AVE. PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SET NAME/NUMBER SHOWCASING
 SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS ALONG PROPERTY FRONTAGE. PROVIDE
 PROPOSED SIDEWALK EXACT WIDTH DIMENSIONS IN THE COMMENT
 RESPONSE.
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
  
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 03-29-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 03-29-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-03-29 13:47:38TRAFFIC COMMENTS:
 1. PER TPS RECOMMENDATION, IMPROVE NB LEFT-TURN QUEUE
 CAPACITY ALONG EXECUTIVE CENTER DR AT THE PALM BEACH
 LAKES BLVD INTERSECTION. UPDATED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS WAS
 NOT PROVIDED IN THE LATEST RESUBMISSION. THE PARKING
 ANALYSIS DOES NOT ADDRESS THIS COMMENT.
 2. PER TPS RECOMMENDATION, CONSTRUCT RIGHT-TURN
 DECELERATION LANES AT DRIVEWAY #2 AND #3. PROVIDE
 PROPER LEFT-TURN CHANNELIZATION TO DRIVEWAY #2 AND #3
 BY MEANS OF EITHER STRIPING OR MID-BLOCK ISLANDS.
 UPDATED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS WAS NOT PROVIDED IN THE LATEST
 RESUBMISSION. THE PARKING ANALYSIS DOES NOT ADDRESS
 THIS COMMENT.
 3. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE AND LARGE
 DELIVERY TRUCK OPERATIONS WITHIN THE FACILITY
 3A. THE WB-67 ANALYSIS SHOWS AN ENCROACHMENT WITH THE
 LEFT SIDE CURB IN THE SOUTH-EAST PORTION OF THE LOT
 WHILE TURNING LEFT TOWARDS THE EXIT DRIVEWAY
 3B. GARBAGE TRUCK ANALYSIS SEEMS MISSING
 4. PERTAINING THE PARKING STUDY. PROVIDE PARKING DEMAND
 VALUES BASED ON ITE PARKING GENERATION MANUAL 5TH
 EDITION AND COMPARE THEM WITH THE STUDY ESTIMATE.
 PLEASE ELABORATE AND JUSTIFY THE RESULTS.
  
 SITE COMMENTS:
 5. EXTEND THE WIDER SIDEWALK CONFIGURATION ALONG THE
 PROPERTY FRONTAGE NORTH OF DRIVEWAY #2. PLEASE PROVIDE
 PLAN SET NAME/NUMBER SHOWCASING SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS
 6. CONSIDER IMPLEMENTING A MULTIMODAL PATH ALONG SITE
 FRONTAGE OR CONFIGURE EXECUTIVE CENTER DR ROAD GEOMETRY
 TO MIMIC THE PORTION SOUTH OF CONGRESS AVE. PLEASE
 PROVIDE PLAN SET NAME/NUMBER SHOWCASING SIDEWALK
 DIMENSIONS ALONG PROPERTY FRONTAGE. PROVIDE PROPOSED
 SIDEWALK EXACT WIDTH DIMENSIONS IN THE COMMENT
 RESPONSE.
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
  
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-10-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 12-10-2020 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-12-10 13:06:23TRAFFIC COMMENTS:
 1. PER TPS RECOMMENDATION, IMPROVE NB LEFT-TURN QUEUE
 CAPACITY ALONG EXECUTIVE CENTER DR AT THE PALM BEACH
 LAKES BLVD INTERSECTION
 2. PER TPS RECOMMENDATION, CONSTRUCT RIGHT-TURN
 DECELERATION LANES AT DRIVEWAY #2 AND #3. PROVIDE
 PROPER LEFT-TURN CHANNELIZATION TO DRIVEWAY #2 AND #3
 BY MEANS OF EITHER STRIPING OR MID-BLOCK ISLANDS
 3. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE AND LARGE
 DELIVERY TRUCK OPERATIONS WITHIN THE FACILITY
  
 SITE COMMENTS:
 4. EXTEND THE EXISTING WIDER SIDEWALK CONFIGURATION
 ALONG THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE NORTH OF DRIVEWAY #2
 5. CONSIDER IMPLEMENTING A MULTIMODAL PATH ALONG SITE
 FRONTAGE OR CONFIGURE EXECUTIVE CENTER DR ROAD GEOMETRY
 TO MIMIC THE PORTION SOUTH OF CONGRESS AVE
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 5 Status P Date 07-19-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 07-19-2021 Time 10:52 Rev Time 3.00
Received By eschneid Date 07-16-2021 Time 09:43 Sent To  
Notes
2021-07-19 10:51:29THE APPLICATION IS SUFFICIENT FOR PLANNING BOARD WITH
 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS/DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (FINAL
 WORDING WILL BE CONTAINED IN THE PLANNING BOARD
 REPORT). NOTE: ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS/DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED BASED ON COMMENTS FROM
 OTHER REVIEWERS OR DURING THE DRAFTING OF THE REPORTS
 OR LEGISLATION.
  
 WAIVER UPDATE
  
 ACCESS POINTS - WHILE THIS WAIVER IS LISTED ON THE
 PLANS, THE RESPONSE INCORRECTLY STATES THAT IT IS NOT
 REQUIRED. THE ACCESS POINTS ARE BASED ON A DEVELOPMENT,
 NOT THE INDIVIDUAL PARCELS WITHIN A DEVELOPMENT;
 THEREFORE, THE WAIVER IS REQUIRED FOR THE THREE
 PROPOSED ACCESS POINTS.
  
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER - THE TITLE OF THE CODE SECTION
 (97-443.B.4) AND CITED ON THE WAIVER TABLE ON SHEET
 C101.0 IS CUT SHORT AND THUS IMPLIES THAT IT IS NOT AT
 THE LOCATION WHERE THE WAIVER IS ACTUALLY FOR SINCE
 THIS IS NOT A BUFFER ADJACENT TO A THOROUGHFARE..
 CONDITION: PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE HEARING FOR CITY
 COMMISSION, THIS LINE NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED TO STAGE
 "BUFFERING OF NONRESIDENTIAL USES ADJACENT TO A
 NONRESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT" AND THE REVISED SHEET
 PROVIDED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 SITE PLAN
  
 CONDITION: PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE CASE BEFORE THE CITY
 COMMISSION, ALL THE MISALIGNED DIMENSION TAGS ON SHEET
 C102.0 MUST BE CORRECTED. ***** NOT ALL WERE CORRECTED
 FOR CURRENT RESUBMITTAL.
  
 CONDITION: PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE CASE BEFORE THE CITY
 COMMISSION, THE PLANS NEED TO BE UPDATED TO SHOW EITHER
 BENCHES, A SEAT WALL(S), OR OTHER TYPE OF SEATING AT
 THE BIOSWALE OVERLOOKS. THE SEATING SHALL BE DESIGNED
 TO COMPLY WITH CRIME PREVENTION THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL
 DESIGN (CEPTD) STANDARDS.
  
 CONDITION: PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE HEARING BEFORE THE
 CITY COMMISSION, PROVIDE A SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION
 FOR THAT PORTION OF THE NEW DRAINAGE EASEMENT WITHIN
 THE BRANDSMARRT CPD PROPERTY SO THAT THE CITY CAN
 PREPARE THE AGREEMENT TO TERMINATE AND REDEDICATE THE
 DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO REFLECT THE ACTUAL PIPE LOCATION.
  
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR CPD
  
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATION: PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION, THE
 FPL MUST PROVIDE A RELEASE OF THE EASEMENTS WHICH
 CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED BJS BUILDING.
  
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATION: ALL TRANSFORMERS MUST BE
 SCREENED FROM VIEW BY THE PUBLIC.
  
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATION: ALL ROOFTOP MECHANICAL
 EQUIPMENT MUST BE SCREENED TO THE FULL HEIGHT OF THE
 EQUIPMENT.
  
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATION: IN THE EVENT THAT THE PARCEL IS
 SUBDIVIDED, PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CO FOR THE BJS
 BUILDING, CROSS UTILITY AGREEMENTS/EASEMENTS WILL BE
 REQUIRED FOR THE BRANDSMART CPD.
  
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATION: IN THE EVENT THAT THE PARCEL IS
 SUBDIVIDED, PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CO FOR THE BJS
 BUILDING, A PLAT FOR THE PROPERTY MUST BE APPROVED BY
 THE CITY AND RECORDED BY THE APPLICANT.
  
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATION (DRAFT): PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF
 CO, THE APPLICANT WILL USE BEST EFFORTS TO WORK WITH
 PALM BEACH COUNTY TO IMPLEMENT RESTRIPING ON THE
 NORTHBOUND APPROACH (SOUTH LEG) OF THE INTERSECTION OF
 PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD & EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE TO
 ALLOW FOR: 2 LEFT TURN LANES + 1 SHARED THROUGH/RIGHT
 LANE AND THE ASSOCIATED SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS THAT WOULD
 BE REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE THIS RESTRIPING. IF,
 HOWEVER, THE COUNTY ULTIMATELY DETERMINES THAT THE
 ASSOCIATED SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS CANNOT BE IMPLEMENTED
 WHILE UTILIZING THE EXISTING CONCRETE STRAIN POLES AT
 THE INTERSECTION, THIS IMPROVEMENT WILL NOT BE
 REQUIRED. INSTEAD, THE APPLICANT WILL PROVIDE STRIPING
 TO MAXIMIZE THE NORTHBOUND LEFT TURN STORAGE LENGTH TO
 THE EXTENT PRACTICAL AND CONTRIBUTE $150,000 TOWARDS
 THE CITY'S TROLLEY FUND.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 06-28-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 06-28-2021 Time 14:40 Rev Time 5.00
Received By eschneid Date 06-25-2021 Time 09:12 Sent To  
Notes
2021-06-28 14:41:49CASE NO. PB1060MM - JUNE 28, 2021 REVIEW
 BJS @ BRANDSMART
 751 WEST EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,
 [email protected]
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR
 (4) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE
 SCHEDULED FOR THE NEXT AVAILABLE PLANNING BOARD
 MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM
 THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY AUGUST 28, 2021), THE
 PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT THAT THE
 CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL
 REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 1) THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT REMOVED REFERENCE TO
 SEATING AT THE BIOSWALE OVERLOOKS. SEATING NEEDS TO BE
 PROVIDED AT THESE LOCATIONS (THIS CAN BE USED BY NOT
 ONLY THE PUBLIC, BUT ALSO EMPLOYEES EATING LUNCH).
  
 WAIVERS
  
 2) STAFF HAS IDENTIFIED ADDITIONAL WAIVERS THAT ARE
 REQUIRED:
  
 A. THE AREA WHERE THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT IS DOES NOT
 PROVIDE THE BUFFER TREES AT THE REQUIRED 30-FOOT ON
 CENTER. STAFF DOES NOT OBJECT TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST.
  
 B. THE SITE EXCEEDS THE NUMBER OF ACCESS POINTS
 PERMITTED ONTO A RIGHT-OF-WAY. SECTION 94-312.1.A
 PERMITS ONLY TWO ACCESS POINTS ONTO EXECUTIVE CENTER
 DRIVE. BASED ON THE SITE DESIGN, STAFF DOES NOT OBJECT
 TO A WAIVER REQUEST FOR THREE ACCESS POINTS.
  
 SITE PLAN
  
 3) SHEET C102.0 HAS MISALIGNED DIMENSION TAGS ALONG THE
 PARKING ROWS ADJACENT TO I-95. THESE NEED TO BE
 CORRECTLY PLACED.
  
 LANDSCAPE PLAN
  
 4) THE EXISTING STORMWATER PIPE FROM BEST BUY TO
 EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE IS NOT SHOWN ON SHEET L-200 BUT
 NOT ON ENLARGED SHEET L-201. THE PROPOSED REPLACEMENT
 12-FOOT WIDE STORMWATER EASEMENT, CENTERED ON THE
 STORMWATER PIPE, IS NOT SHOWN ON EITHER SHEET. THESE
 MUST BE SHOWN ON BOTH SHEETS SO THAT PLANNING CAN
 VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO TREES PLACED WITHIN THE
 STORMWATER EASEMENT AND THAT TREES IN PROXIMITY TO THE
 EASEMENT HAVE THE PROPER ROOT BARRIER. A WAIVER IS
 REQUIRED FOR THE TREES THAT WILL NOT BE INSTALLED AND
 WITHOUT THE EASEMENT ACCURATELY SHOWN ON THE PLAN,
 STAFF CANNOT ENUMERATE THE SPECIFIC WAIVER REQUIRED.
  
 5) THERE ARE NUMEROUS CONFLICTS WHERE REQUIRED TREES
 ARE EITHER CLOSE TO OR ON TOP OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY
 INFRASTRUCTURE ON THE SITE, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED.
 STAFF WILL BE PROVIDING A MARKED-UP PLAN WITH THESE
 LOCATIONS UNDER SEPARATE COVER.
  
 6) THE PARKING ROWS IN THE PARKING FIELD ON THE SOUTH
 PORTION OF THE SITE DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE DIVIDER
 MEDIAN REQUIREMENTS. THIS COMMENT WAS PREVIOUSLY
 INCLUDED AND DISCUSSED WITH RAY CARANCI, SENIOR
 LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND NOT ADDRESSED. STAFF WILL BE
 PROVIDING A MARKED-UP PLAN WITH ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
 UNDER SEPARATE COVER. THIS MAY REQUIRE AN UPDATE TO THE
 PARKING TABLE.
  
 7) THERE ARE TERMINAL ISLANDS THAT DO NOT HAVE THE
 REQUIRED TREES. STAFF WILL BE PROVIDING A MARKED-UP
 PLAN WITH THESE LOCATIONS UNDER SEPARATE COVER.
  
 8) THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED TREE COUNTS ON THE WPB
 LANDSCAPE LEGEND CONTAIN ERRORS. THE CITY REQUIRES THAT
 ANY PARTIAL TREE IS ROUNDED UP. THIS REQUIRED TREES ON
 THE EAST, WEST AND EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE FRONTAGES
 EACH REQUIRE ONE ADDITIONAL TREE. STAFF HAS COUNTED THE
 TREES ALONG EACH OF THESE BUFFERS AND THERE ARE AN
 ADEQUATE NUMBER OF TREES (NOT TRESS AS MISSPELLED ON
 THE TABLE) PROVIDED, AND ON AT LEAST TWO OF THE BUFFERS
 THE NUMBER PROVIDED IS UNDER COUNTED COMPARED WITH WHAT
 IS PROVIDED.
  
 CONDITION - PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION, THE FPL MUST
 PROVIDE A RELEASE OF THE EASEMENTS WHICH CONFLICT WITH
 THE PROPOSED BJS BUILDING.
  
 CONDITION - ALL TRANSFORMERS MUST BE SCREENED.
  
 CONDITION - ALL ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MUST BE
 SCREENED TO THE FULL HEIGHT OF THE EQUIPMENT.
  
 CONDITION - CROSS UTILITY AGREEMENTS/EASEMENTS WILL BE
 REQUIRED.
  
 CONDITION - PRIOR TO CO THE PLAT NEEDS TO BE RECORDED.
  
 SITE CIRCULATION
  
 PLANNING STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE EASEMENT WITH COVENANTS
 AND RESTRICTIONS COVERING THE CROSS-ACCESS AREA WITH
 THE CITY SURVEYOR AND ATTORNEY'S OFFICE IN RELATION TO
 THE LATEST SUBMITTED SITE PLAN AND VERIFIED THAT THE
 PROPOSED NORTHERN ACCESS DRIVE FALLS WITHIN THE ACCESS
 EASEMENT LIMITS. THEREFORE, THERE IS NO CONFLICT
 BETWEEN THIS PROJECT AND THE EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF BEST
 BUY. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT YOU STILL PURSUE ABANDONING
 THE EASEMENT WITH BEST BUY AS IT DOES NOT APPEAR TO NO
 LONGER BE NEEDED.
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 06-01-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 06-01-2021 Time 12:10 Rev Time 5.00
Received By eschneid Date 05-28-2021 Time 16:22 Sent To  
Notes
2021-06-01 12:12:24CASE NO. PB1060MM - MAY 31, 2021 REVIEW
 BJS @ BRANDSMART
 751 WEST EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,
 [email protected]
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR
 (4) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE
 SCHEDULED A PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM
 THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY AUGUST 1, 2021), THE
 PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT THAT THE
 CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL
 REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 INNOVATIVE FEATURES LISTED IN JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT
  
 1) THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT LISTS THAT THE
 DECORATIVE CONCRETE PATH AND PAVER PLAZA AROUND THE
 BIOSWALE INCLUDES A SEAT WALL, BENCHES, LIGHTED
 BOLLARDS. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE PAVER OVERLOOKS
 AND THE WALKWAY MEETING THIS STATEMENT. THE PLANS DO
 NOT SHOW ANY SEAT WALL OR BENCHES AT THE OVERLOOKS.
 SOME SEATING NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED AT THESE LOCATIONS
 (CAN BE USED BY EMPLOYEES TO EAT LUNCH). ADDITIONALLY,
 THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHOWS NO DETAILS OF BOLLARD
 LIGHTING OR BOLLARD LIGHTING LOCATIONS ALONG THE PATH.
 PLEASE UPDATE THE PLANS ACCORDINGLY.
  
 2) PLEASE PROVIDE THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT IN WORD.
  
 WAIVERS
  
 3) STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE WAIVERS LISTED IN THE
 JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AS WELL AS WHAT STAFF HAS
 IDENTIFIED BASED ON THE PLANS AND HAS PROVIDED THEM
 BELOW WITH COMMENTARY.
  
 A. WAIVER REQUESTED FOR NUMBER OF ON-SITE PARKING
 SPACES REQUIRED - THE CITY'S TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
 COMMENTS POSTED ON MARCH 29, 2021, REQUIRED THE
 SUBMITTAL OF SUPPLEMENTAL ITE INFORMATION FOR THE
 PARKING STUDY. PLANNING STAFF IS AWAITING THE TRAFFIC
 ENGINEERING REVIEW TO FINALIZE IF THE PARKING STUDY
 REQUIREMENT HAS BEEN MET TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE
 PARKING WAIVER.
  
 B. INTERIOR LOT LINE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS - THE
 PERIMETER BUFFER APPEARS TO MEET THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPE
 BUFFER REQUIREMENTS, AND IN SOME AREA EXCEEDS THE
 MINIMUM WIDTH. THE AREA ALONG THE NEIGHBORING PARCEL TO
 THE NORTH WHERE THE EXISTING EASEMENT IS SHOWS
 COMPLIANT LANDSCAPE; HOWEVER, THIS EASEMENT NEEDS TO BE
 AMENDED TO PERMIT THE TREES AS SHOWN. A LATER COMMENT
 ADDRESSES THIS. STAFF DOES NOT OBJECT TO THIS WAIVER
 REQUEST.
  
 C. NUMBER OF SIGNS ON THE BJS - 3 PERMITTED, 6
 PROPOSED. MEETS SF ALLOWANCE. THE MORE DESIRABLE AND
 ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT BASED ON THE PROVISION OF A TRUE
 BIOSWALE WITH FULL BOARDWALK CAN OFFSET THIS WAIVER
 REQUEST. STAFF DOES NOT OBJECT TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST.
  
 D. SIGNS ON THE SHORT END OF THE FUEL CANOPY EXCEED
 REQUIRED SIGNAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE ALLOWANCE. THE
 PERMITTED SIGN SQUARE FOOTAGE IS 4.32 ON EACH SHORT END
 OF THE CANOPY. THE SIGN PACKAGE SHOWS THESE SIGNS AS
 22.1 SQUARE FEET IN AREA. THE PROPOSED SIGNS ARE
 APPROXIMATELY 5 TIMES LARGER THAN IS PERMITTED. IF BJS
 WISHES TO HAVE THESE SIGNS, THEN A WAIVER TO THE SIZE
 OF THE SIGNS IS REQUIRED. NOTE: NO DIMENSIONS FOR THE
 SIGNS WERE PROVIDED ON THE FUEL STATION ELEVATION. THIS
 WAIVER IS REQUESTED IN THE RESPONSE COMMENTS BY NOT
 LISTED AS A WAIVER REQUEST ELSEWHERE (TO INCLUDE IN THE
 JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT). PLEASE UPDATE IF YOU ARE
 REQUESTING THIS WAIVER.
  
 E. THE DOUBLE ROW OF COMPACT PARKING CONTAINS 11
 PARKING SPACES IN A ROW, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED UNLESS
 THE STAGGERED INTERIOR PARKING ISLAND PROVISION IS
 USED. THIS HAS NOT BEEN LISTED AS A WAIVER REQUEST.
 NOTE: STAFF IS NOT PREPARED TO SUPPORT THIS THIS
 PROPOSED WAIVER.
  
 SUBDIVISION
  
 4) THE SITE REQUIRES A MINOR SUBDIVISION. AS STATED IN
 THE ORIGINAL COMMENTS FOR THE PROJECT, THE MINOR
 SUBDIVISION (PLAT REVIEW) REQUIRES THE SUBMITTAL OF A
 MINOR SUBDIVISION (PLAT) APPLICATION, WHICH WAS NOT
 SUBMITTED WITH THE REVISED PLAT.
  
 PARKING
  
 5) NOT ALL THE COMPACT PARKING SPACES MAY BE LABELED AS
 EMPLOYEE ONLY.
  
 6) THE THREE WESTERNMOST COMPACT SPACES ON THE NORTH
 SIDE OF THE BJS BUILDING DO NOT HAVE THE REQUIRED 24
 FOOT BACK UP AREA FOR 90-DEGREE PARKING SPACES AND THUS
 ARE NOT PERMITTED.
  
 7) THE EMPLOYEE PARKING SPACES ADJACENT TO THE
 0.34-ACRE DRY DETENTION AREA HAD THE WHEEL STOPS
 REMOVED AND THE SIGNS MOVED BACK SO THAT THERE IS NOW A
 TWO-FOOT OVERHANG AREA, WHICH MAKES THESE 18-FOOT-DEEP
 PARKING SPACES AND NO LONGER COMPACT PARKING SPACES.
 UPDATE THE PLANS AND THE PARKING TABLE ACCORDINGLY.
  
 8) THE SIGNPOSTS BETWEEN THE FACING TIRE CENTER PARKING
 SPACES ARE ONE FOOT IN DIAMETER, WHICH ENCROACH INTO
 THE PARKING SPACES MAKING THE SPACES NO LONGER CODE
 COMPLIANT AS THEY ARE NO LONGER 18 FEET DEEP. THE SIGN
 DETAILS WERE NOT UPDATED.
  
 9) THE SIGNPOSTS BETWEEN THE FACING MEMBER WITH INFANT
 PARKING SPACES ARE ONE FOOT IN DIAMETER, WHICH ENCROACH
 INTO THE PARKING SPACES MAKING THE SPACES NO LONGER
 CODE COMPLIANT AS THEY ARE NO LONGER 18 FEET DEEP. THE
 SIGN DETAILS WERE NOT UPDATED.
  
 10) THE LIGHT POSTS IN THE PARKING ROWS ON THE EASTERN
 PARKING AREA MUST BE LOCATED IN THE CORNER WHERE THE
 FOUR SPACES MEET, NOT IN THE MIDDLE AS SHOWN AS THIS
 RENDERS THE PARKING SPACES NON-COMPLIANT BASED ON THE
 PARKING SPACE NO LONGER BEING 18 FEET DEEP. ONE LIGHT
 POLE IS STILL INCORRECTLY SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
  
 11) PARKING PROVIDED - THIS NEEDS TO BE UPDATED BASED
 ON THE COMMENTS PROVIDED.
  
 12) BICYCLE PARKING
  
 A. THANK YOU FOR UPDATING THE PARKING TABLE TO SHOW
 THAT 39 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED AND THAT
 YOU PLAN TO INSTALL 40 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES.
 B. THE PLANS MUST CLEARLY SHOW THE NUMBER OF BICYCLE
 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED AT EACH LOCATION SO THAT STAFF
 CAN VERIFY THE TOTAL NUMBER OF SPACES PROVIDED.
 C. THE CODE COMPLIANT DIMENSIONS OF THE BICYCLE RACK
 PADS IS REQUIRED TO BE INCLUDED ON THE SITE PLAN.
 D. THE BICYCLE RACK STYLE DETAILS. WITH DIMENSIONS, IS
 REQUIRED TO BE SHOWN ON THE DETAIL SHEET. NOTE: THE
 WAVE STYLE THAT IS SHOWN IS NOT PERMITTED IN THE CITY.
 E. A BICYCLE PAD DETAIL, WITH DIMENSIONS, IS REQUIRED
 FOR EACH SET OF BICYCLE RACKS. THE RACK LOCATION ON THE
 PADS MUST CLEARLY BE SHOWN TO MEET CITY STANDARDS.
  
 SITE CIRCULATION
  
 13) THE CARWASH APPLICANT PROVIDED A COPY OF THE
 EASEMENT WITH COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS COVERING THE
 CROSS-ACCESS AREA. IT INDICATES THAT BEST BUY HAS AN
 INTEREST IN THE CROSS ACCESS, SPECIFICALLY A DRIVE TO
 EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE. PLEASE PROVIDE VERIFICATION
 THAT BEST BUY HAS RELEASED THEIR INTEREST IN THE
 EASEMENT. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS LANDSCAPING OBSTRUCTING
 BEST BUY FROM UTILIZING THE EASEMENT. PLEASE NOTE THAT
 REGARDLESS OF WHAT IS STATED IN THE EASEMENT, BEST BUY
 HAS NO RIGHTS TO THE INSTALLATION OF AN OFF-PREMISE
 SIGN, WHICH WOULD BE IN VIOLATION OF THE ZONING AND
 LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. NO EVIDENCE THAT BEST BUY
 NO LONGER HAS RIGHTS OR AN INTEREST IN THE CROSS ACCESS
 HAS BEEN PROVIDED.
  
 LANDSCAPE
  
 14) ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITIES AND EASEMENTS
 MUST BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SO THAT STAFF CAN
 VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSED PLANS
 OR THAT PROPER ROOT BARRIERS ARE PROPOSED.
  
 A. THE EXISTING STORMWATER PIPE FROM BEST BUY TO
 EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE IS NOT SHOWN. AS PART OF THE
 APPROVALS FOR THE TWO NEIGHBORING DEVELOPMENTS, THE
 STORMWATER EASEMENT IS PLANNED TO BE REDUCED TO 12 FOOT
 IN WIDTH, CENTERED ON THE STORMWATER PIPE. THE
 LANDSCAPE PLANS NEED TO SHOW VERIFICATION THAT THE
 LANDSCAPE IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN THIS FUTURE REDUCED
 EASEMENT. THE LANDSCAPE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE CURRENT
 EASEMENT, WHICH WOULD NOT BE PERMITTED.
  
 B. THE EXISTING WATER AND SANITARY LINES THAT TRAVERSE
 THE SITE TO THE EXISTING LIFT STATION ARE NOT SHOWN ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLANS AND SHOW POTENTIAL CONFLICTS WITH
 THE PROPOSED TREES IN THE PARKING DIVIDER ROWS AND
 ISLANDS.
  
 15) REMOVE THE UTILITY LINES THAT WILL BE NO LONGER
 EXIST FROM THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. THERE IS AT LEAST ONE
 WATER LINE AND ONE STORMWATER LINE THAT AT SHOWN BEING
 REMOVED ON THE CIVIL DEMOLITION PLANS THAT ARE STILL
 SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 16) THERE ARE TWO TERMINAL ISLANDS THAT DO NOT HAVE THE
 REQUIRED TREES.
  
 A. ONE CONTAINS THE PROPOSED SIGN ALONG I95.
  
 B. ONE IS NEAR THE LIFT STATION BY THE FUEL PUMP AREA.
  
 17) THE WIDTH OF ALL OF THE TERMINAL ISLAND TREES IN
 THE SOUTH PARKING AREA WERE NOT PROVIDED. THE PLANS
 MUST CLEARLY SHOW THAT THESE TERMINAL ISLANDS HAVE THE
 REQUIRED EIGHT (8) FEET OF WIDTH FOR THE LENGTH OF THE
 PARKING STALL.
  
 CONDITION - PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION, THE FPL MUST
 PROVIDE A RELEASE OF THE EASEMENTS WHICH CONFLICT WITH
 THE PROPOSED BJS BUILDING.
  
 CONDITION - ALL TRANSFORMERS MUST BE SCREENED.
  
 CONDITION - ALL ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MUST BE
 SCREENED TO THE FULL HEIGHT OF THE EQUIPMENT.
  
 CONDITION - CROSS UTILITY AGREEMENTS/EASEMENTS WILL BE
 REQUIRED.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 03-22-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 03-22-2021 Time 17:02 Rev Time 5.00
Received By eschneid Date 03-16-2021 Time 10:47 Sent To  
Notes
2021-03-22 17:03:47CASE NO. PB1060MM
 BJS @ BRANDSMART
 751 WEST EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,
 [email protected]
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR
 (4) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE
 SCHEDULED A PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM
 THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY MAY 22, 2020), THE
 PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT THAT THE
 CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL
 REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 INNOVATIVE FEATURES LISTED IN JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT
  
 1) PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WAIVERS ARE TO ENCOURAGE THE USE
 OF INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES
 TO CREATE MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT IN
 THE CITY. THE ITEMS LISTED BELOW ARE STATED AS THE
 INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES
 FROM THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AND STAFF'S RESPONSE:
  
 A. PROPOSED INTERCONNECTIVITY TO THE ADJACENT SITE ****
 THE SITE PLAN DOES SHOW INTERCONNECTIVITY; HOWEVER, IT
 DOES NOT ALIGN WITH THE CARWASH NEXT DOOR. THIS WILL BE
 DISCUSSED IN MORE DEPTH LATER IN THE COMMENTS.
 B. SIGNIFICANTLY UPGRADING THE LANDSCAPED OPEN SPACE
 **** THE LANDSCAPE AREA BEHIND BRANDSMART THAT IS
 REQUIRED BY ORDINANCE NO. 3122-98 IS PROPOSED TO HAVE
 ALL OF THE EXISTING MATURE TREES AND PALMS EITHER
 RELOCATED OR REMOVED. PLEASE NOTE THE LANDSCAPE COMMENT
 REQUIREMENT THAT YOU MUST PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS THAT
 YOU ARE INCREASING THE TREE CANOPY/MASS IN THIS AREA.
 THE PLAN REPLACES THE BERMED LANDSCAPE AREA WITH THE
 DETENTION AREA, WHICH PROVIDES LESS VISUAL BUFFERING.
 NOTE: ONCE STAFF HAS THIS ANALYSIS, IT CAN BE
 DETERMINED IF THERE IS AN UPGRADE. PLEASE PROVIDE THE
 SAME ANALYSIS FOR THE AREA IN FRONT OF THE PROPOSED
 BJS.
 C. OFFERING A NEW PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY PARK
 AREA/WALKABLE AMENITIES **** THIS NEEDS TO BE UPDATED
 TO REFLECT IS A BOARDWALK THROUGH A BIOSWALE AREA.
 THERE IS NO LONGER A SEAT WALL, BENCHES, A DECORATIVE
 CONCRETE PATH AND PAVER PLAZA. ADDITIONALLY, AS
 PROPOSED, THE BOARDWALKS THROUGH THE BIOSWALE AREA (IN
 ACTUALITY A STANDARD BAHIA GRASS DRY DETENTION AREA)
 DOES NOT MEET THE THRESHOLD OF INNOVATIVE LANDS
 PLANNING TO OFF SET DESIGN THAT IS PROPOSED AND THE
 WAIVERS REQUIRED BY THE DESIGN. IN ORDER TO COMPLY, THE
 BIOSWALE NEEDS TO BE TRULY DESIGNED (AND MAINTAINED) AS
 A BIOSWALE THAT PROVIDES BOTH NATURAL DRAINAGE
 FILTERING AND HABITAT. THE TWO PROPOSED BOARDWALKS NEED
 TO CONNECT PARALLEL TO EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE SO THAT
 USERS CAN TRAVERSE THE LENGTH OF THE BIOSWALE.
 D. INCLUDE OVERALL DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR THE INFILL AND
 REDEVELOPMENT OF THE PCD **** TO REPEAT, THE CREATION
 OF DESIGN GUIDELINES THAT JUST INCLUDE THE WAIVERS IS
 NOT A JUSTIFICATION FOR THE WAIVERS REQUESTED AND ARE
 NOT JUSTIFICATION FOR A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT.
 E. REDUCE THE IMPACT OF THE REQUESTED PCD WAIVERS BY
 NEW PROJECT DESIGN GUIDELINES **** TO REPEAT, DESIGN
 GUIDELINES THAT RESTATE THE WAIVERS DO NOT REDUCE THEIR
 IMPACT.
 F. CREATE A POA FOR THE OVERALL MAINTENANCE CARE AND
 UPKEEP OF THE NEW COMMON AREAS **** CREATING A POA FOR
 COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE IS NOT INNOVATIVE AND SHOULD BE
 A GIVEN FOR ANY COMMERCIAL PROJECT.
 G. THE SITE'S REDEVELOPMENT WILL BRING ADDITIONAL AD
 VALOREM TAX BASE TO THE CITY **** ADDITIONAL AD VALOREM
 TAX BASE IS NOT AN INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING DEVELOPMENT
 TECHNIQUE AND DOES NOT RESULT IN DESIRABLE AND
 ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT.
 H. THE OVERALL PROJECT WILL BE AN ECONOMIC VALUE-ADDED
 ADDITION TO THE CITY'S CONTINUED ECONOMIC SUCCESS ****
 AN ECONOMIC VALUE-ADDED PROJECT NOT AN INNOVATIVE LAND
 PLANNING DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUE AND DOES NOT RESULT IN
 DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT.
  
 2) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PROPOSED SITE DESIGN DOES NOT
 INCLUDE THE USE OF SUFFICIENT INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING
 AND DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES TO CREATE A DESIRABLE AND
 ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT TO JUSTIFY THE GRANTING OF THE
 REQUESTED WAIVERS. WHILE THE REVISED DESIGN ALONG
 EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE HAS STARTED TO HEAD IN THE RIGHT
 DIRECTION, THE TWO DETENTION AREAS SURROUNDED BY TREES
 NEED TO BE ENHANCED AND TURNED INTO TRUE BIOSWALES WITH
 THE LARGER ONE (IN FRONT OF BRANDSMART) HAVING THE
 BOARDWALK TRAVERSING ITS LENGTH TO APPROACH THE IN
 INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES TO
 CREATE MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT IN THE
 CITY. YOU WILL ALSO SEE THE ENHANCEMENTS TO THE BJS
 FA?ADE THAT WILL RESULT IN A MORE ATTRACTIVE PEDESTRIAN
 EXPERIENCE.
  
 WAIVERS
  
 3) STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE WAIVERS LISTED IN THE
 JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AS WELL AS WHAT STAFF HAS
 IDENTIFIED BASED ON THE PLANS AND HAS PROVIDED THEM
 BELOW WITH COMMENTARY.
  
 A. WAIVER REQUESTED FOR NUMBER OF ON SITE PARKING
 SPACES REQUIRED - PLANNING STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE
 PARKING STUDY AND IS AWAITING INPUT FROM TRAFFIC
 ENGINEERING FOR FINAL COMMENTS.
  
 B. INTERIOR LOT LINE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS - STAFF WOULD
 ACCEPT THE WAIVER REQUEST; HOWEVER, SINCE THERE ARE
 LOCATIONS ALONG THE EXTERIOR BUFFERS THAT DO NOT
 MINIMUM LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS, STAFF CANNOT
 JUSTIFY THAT THE INTENT OF THE INTERNAL LANDSCAPE
 BUFFERS ARE BEING MET BY THE PROVISION OF THE EXTERNAL
 LANDSCAPE BUFFERS. IF EXTERNAL BUFFER REQUIREMENTS ARE
 MET, THE MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT
 BASED ON THE PROVISION OF A TRUE BIOSWALE WITH FULL
 BOARDWALK CAN OFFSET THIS WAIVER REQUEST.
  
 C. MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACKS - NEED HEIGHT OF
 BRANDSMART TO VERIFY THE REQUIRED SIDE SETBACK (10
 FEET) TO SEE IF A WAIVER IS REQUIRED. IF NEEDED, THE
 MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT BASED ON THE
 PROVISION OF A TRUE BIOSWALE WITH FULL BOARDWALK CAN
 OFFSET THIS WAIVER REQUEST.
  
 D. THERE IS NO MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT IN A GENERAL
 COMMERCIAL DISTRICT SO THE LISTED WAIVER TO BUILDING
 HEIGHT DOES NOT APPLY AND NEEDS TO BE REMOVED. NOTE:
 TALLER BUILDINGS REQUIRE GREATER SETBACKS, BUT THAT, IF
 REQUIRED, IS COVERED BY COMMENT #3C.
  
 E. NUMBER OF SIGNS ON THE BJS - 3 PERMITTED, 6
 PROPOSED. MEETS SF ALLOWANCE. THE MORE DESIRABLE AND
 ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT BASED ON THE PROVISION OF A TRUE
 BIOSWALE WITH FULL BOARDWALK CAN OFFSET THIS WAIVER
 REQUEST.
  
 F. NUMBER OF SIGNS ON THE FUEL CANOPY - 3 PERMITTED, 4
 PROPOSED. THE MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT
 BASED ON THE PROVISION OF A TRUE BIOSWALE WITH FULL
 BOARDWALK CAN OFFSET THIS WAIVER REQUEST.
  
 G. SIGNS ON THE SHORT END OF THE FUEL CANOPY EXCEED
 REQUIRED SIGNAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE ALLOWANCE. STAFF IS NOT
 PREPARED TO AGREE TO THIS WAIVER.
  
 H. LISTED WAIVER FOR BACKING INTO A STREET DOES NOT
 APPLY AND NEEDS TO BE REMOVED.
  
 I. LISTED WAIVER OF 18 SPACES IN A ROW DOES NOT APPLY
 AND NEEDS TO BE REMOVED. REGARDLESS, STAFF WILL NOT
 SUPPORT THIS WAIVER SINCE THE SITE IS ALREADY
 REQUESTING TO HAVE NO LANDSCAPE BUFFER BETWEEN THE TWO
 PARCELS AND THE PARCEL LINES ARE IN THE PARKING AREAS.
 THIS WAIVER WOULD REDUCE PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE.
  
 J. NOT PLANTING TREES IN THE BUFFER ALONG I-95 IN FRONT
 OF THE SIGNS. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT REDUCTIONS IN THE
 PLACEMENT OF BUFFER LANDSCAPE, ESPECIALLY FOR SIGNS.
  
 K. NOT PLANTING ALONG A PORTION OF THE SITE ADJACENT TO
 FUTURE CARWASH DUE TO EASEMENT. STAFF HAS COVERED THIS
 IN THE EASEMENT SECTION OF THE COMMENTS.
  
 4) THE SITE REQUIRES A MINOR SUBDIVISION, BUT NO PLAT
 WAS PROVIDED FOR REVIEW.
  
 5) THE FAR TABLE ON SHEET C101.0 IS INCORRECT. THE
 MAXIMUM FAR FOR THE SITE IS 1.0, NOT 2.0. WHILE THE
 SITE COMPLIES, THE TABLE NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED.
  
 PARKING
  
 6) THE PLANS NOW IDENTIFY COMPACT SPACES, WHICH ARE ALL
 DESIGNATED AS EMPLOYEE PARKING SPACES. WHERE DO
 EMPLOYEES WITH NON-COMPACT CARS PARK?
  
 7) THE BRANDSMART EMPLOYEE COMPACT SPACES MUST BE
 LABELED ON THE PLAN.
  
 8) THE EMPLOYEE PARKING SPACES ADJACENT TO THE 0.34
 ACRE DRY DETENTION AREA SHOULD HAVE THE CURB AT 14 FEET
 WITH A TWO FOOT OVERHANG AND REMOVE THE WHEEL STOPS
 (NOT BOTH A CURB AND WHEEL STOPS). NOTE: THERE MUST BE
 A MINIMUM OF 16 FEET FROM THE END OF THE PARKING SPACE
 TO THE EMPLOYEE PARKING SIGN POST OR THE PARKING SPACE
 IS NONCOMPLIANT.
  
 9) THE SIGN POSTS BETWEEN THE FACING EMPLOYEE PARKING
 SPACES ARE ONE FOOT IN DIAMETER, WHICH ENCROACH INTO
 THE PARKING SPACES AND MAKE THE 16 FOOT DEEP COMPACT
 PARKING SPACES NONCOMPLIANT.
  
 10) THE SIGN POSTS BETWEEN THE FACING TIRE CENTER
 PARKING SPACES ARE ONE FOOT IN DIAMETER, WHICH ENCROACH
 INTO THE PARKING SPACES MAKING THE SPACES NO LONGER
 CODE COMPLIANT AS THEY ARE NO LONGER 18 FEET DEEP.
  
 11) THE SIGN POSTS BETWEEN THE FACING MEMBER WITH
 INFANT PARKING SPACES ARE ONE FOOT IN DIAMETER, WHICH
 ENCROACH INTO THE PARKING SPACES MAKING THE SPACES NO
 LONGER CODE COMPLIANT AS THEY ARE NO LONGER 18 FEET
 DEEP.
  
 12) THE LIGHT POSTS IN THE PARKING ROWS ON THE EASTERN
 PARKING AREA MUST BE LOCATED IN THE CORNER WHERE THE
 FOUR SPACES MEET, NOT IN THE MIDDLE AS SHOWN AS THIS
 RENDERS THE PARKING SPACES NON-COMPLIANT BASED ON THE
 PARKING SPACE NO LONGER BEING 18 FEET DEEP.
  
 13) UPDATED COMMENT: WHERE THERE IS NOT PLANNED TO BE A
 VEHICLE OVERHANG AT THE FRONT OF THE PARKING SPACES,
 WHEEL STOPS MUST BE PROVIDED AND SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
 YOU SHOULD NOT BE INSTALLING WHEEL STOPS AND CURBS. YOU
 THE CURB SHOULD BE PULLED BACK TO THE WHEEL STOP LINE
 WITH THE OVERHANG PROVIDED.
  
 14) PARKING PROVIDED ? VERIFIED AFTER THE LANDSCAPE
 CORRECTIONS ARE MADE.
  
 15) REPEAT COMMENT: NO BICYCLE PARKING WAS PROVIDED.
 CODE COMPLIANT BICYCLE PARKING, BASED ON THE NUMBER OF
 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED, IS REQUIRED.
  
 SITE CIRCULATION
  
 16) THE CROSS ACCESS POINT DOES NOT ALIGN WITH THE
 LOCATION SHOWN ON THE RECENTLY SUBMITTED CARWASH
 REDEVELOPMENT ON THE OLD CHINESE RESTAURANT PARCEL.
 BRIAN CHEGUIS STATED THAT HE HAD COORDINATED WITH THE
 KIMLEY HORN TEAM TO ALIGN THE CROSS ACCESS. THE CROSS
 ACCESS POINT IS FURTHER TO THE WEST FROM WHERE IT IS
 SHOWN ON YOUR PLAN, WHICH CREATES A SAFER SITUATION
 THAN THE LOCATION THAT YOU SHOW CLOSER TO EXECUTIVE
 CENTER DRIVE. PLEASE SHOW ALIGN YOUR PLANS WITH THE
 CARWASH CROSS ACCESS LOCATION.
  
 17) THE CARWASH APPLICANT PROVIDED A COPY OF THE
 EASEMENT WITH COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS COVERING THE
 CROSS ACCESS AREA. IT INDICATES THAT BEST BUY HAS AN
 INTEREST IN THE CROSS ACCESS, SPECIFICALLY A DRIVE TO
 EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE. PLEASE PROVIDE VERIFICATION
 THAT BEST BUY HAS RELEASED THEIR INTEREST IN THE
 EASEMENT. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS LANDSCAPING OBSTRUCTING
 BEST BUY FROM UTILIZING THE EASEMENT. PLEASE NOTE THAT
 REGARDLESS OF WHAT IS STATED IN THE EASEMENT, BEST BUY
 HAS NO RIGHTS TO THE INSTALLATION OF AN OFF PREMISE
 SIGN, WHICH WOULD BE IN VIOLATION OF THE ZONING AND
 LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
  
 SIGNAGE
  
 18) REPEAT COMMENT: THE ISLAND WITH THE EXISTING
 BRANDSMART SIGN IS AN INTERIOR PARKING ISLAND AND IS
 THUS REQUIRED TO CONTAIN A CODE COMPLIANT TREE.
  
 19) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE WHAT THE BJS FUEL STATION
 DIRECTIONAL SIGNS WILL LOOK LIKE. PLEASE NOTE THAT IF
 THE SIGNS ARE PROPOSED TO INCLUDE BJS COPY, THEN THEY
 ARE CONSIDERED FREE STANDING SIGNS AND ARE REQUIRED TO
 COMPLY WITH THE FREESTANDING SIGN REQUIREMENTS. **** NO
 DETAILS OF THESE SIGNS WERE PROVIDED. IF THE REQUEST IS
 APPROVED WITHOUT SIGN DETAILS, THEN THERE MAY BE NO
 DEVIATION FROM THE SIGN REGULATIONS WHEN THESE ARE
 SUBMITTED. THIS INCLUDES NO BJS LOGO BEING PERMITTED.
  
 20) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE A GRAPHIC SHOWING THE SIZE
 AND HEIGHT OF THE EXISTING MONUMENT SIGNS THAT ARE
 PROPOSED TO BE RELOCATED ALONG EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE.
  
 21) UPDATED COMMENT: PROVIDE THE SIZE OF THE MONUMENT
 SIGNS ALONG I-95, BOTH THE EXISTING AND THE PROPOSED
 SIGN. **** THE COMMENT RESPONSE STATES THAT A SIGN
 PACKAGE WAS SUBMITTED. THE ONLY SIGN PACKAGE SUBMITTED
 WAS FOR THE WALL SIGNS.
  
 22) THE SIGN REGULATIONS ONLY PERMIT ONE WALL SIGN PER
 BUSINESS PLUS TWO ADDITIONAL SIGNS. THE BJS ELEVATIONS
 (BOTH STORE AND FUEL CANOPY) SHOW THAT THIS IS
 EXCEEDED, WHICH REQUIRES WAIVERS.
  
 23) THE SIZE OF THE SIGNS ON THE SHORT SIDES OF THE
 FUEL CANOPY EXCEED THE PERMITTED SIGNAGE ALLOWANCE.
 THESE MUST EITHER BE REMOVED, REDUCE OR A WAIVER
 APPROVED.
  
 ELEVATIONS
  
 24) THE DIMENSIONS ON THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS DO NOT
 MEET THE LISTED SCALE. PROVIDE THE BUILDING LENGTH
 DIMENSIONS, SO STAFF IS UNABLE TO VERIFY THE ELEVATIONS
 MEET THE SITE PLAN BUILDING SIZE. DUE TO THE INCORRECT
 SCALE, STAFF IS UNABLE TO EVEN SCALE THE DRAWINGS TO
 DETERMINE THE DIMENSION.
  
 25) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE BJS ELEVATION DRAWING
 WITH THE LANDSCAPE SUPERIMPOSED ON IT. THIS VERIFIES
 THAT THE PEDESTRIAN LEVEL OF THE ELEVATION ALONG
 EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE NEEDS TO BE IMPROVED. THIS CAN
 BE DONE WITH STUCCO BANDING/DESIGNS OR OTHER WALL
 APPLICATIONS WITHIN THE RED ROCK PAINTED CONCRETE WALL
 PANELS TO CREATE PEDESTRIAN LEVEL VISUAL INTEREST.
  
 26) THE BJS ELEVATION PLAN INCLUDES A NOTE STATING,
 "TOWER ELEVATION SUBJECT TO ADJUSTMENT TO ENABLE N/S
 VISIBILITY FROM HIGHWAY I-95". THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS
 NEED TO SHOW THE ACCURATE CONDITIONS THAT ARE BEING
 APPROVED BY THE CITY.
  
 27) THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS DO NOT SHOW THE GENERATOR
 ENCLOSURE WALLS.
  
 28) THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ON THE ROOF OF THE FUEL
 STATION KIOSK NEEDS TO BE FULLY SCREENED. THE PROPOSED
 SCREENING IS INSUFFICIENT.
  
 29) IN ORDER TO VERIFY THE PROPOSED SETBACKS AND IF
 SETBACK WAIVERS ARE REQUIRED, PROVIDE THE HEIGHT OF THE
 BRANDSMART (ELEVATION DRAWING REQUIRED) AND BJS
 BUILDINGS ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS. THE HEIGHT
 MEASUREMENT SHALL CONFORM TO THE ZONING AND LAND
 DEVELOPMENT CODE METHODOLOGY AS FOLLOWS, "THE HEIGHT
 SHALL BE MEASURED AS THE VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM THE
 AVERAGE ELEVATION OF THE FINISHED GRADE OF THE BUILDING
 TO THE HIGHEST POINT OF THE TOP OF THE STRUCTURE OF A
 FLAT ROOF, OR TO THE DECK LINE OF A MANSARD ROOF, OR TO
 THE MEAN HEIGHT LEVEL BETWEEN EAVES AND RIDGE FOR
 GABLE, HIP, AND GAMBREL ROOFS." NOTE: WHILE THE HEIGHT
 IS NOT SHOWN CORRECTLY ON THE BJS ELEVATION DRAWING,
 THE OVERALL HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING SHOWN AT 65 FEET
 MEETS THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL SETBACK REQUIRED OF 21
 FEET FROM THE SIDE PROPERTY LINE.
  
 LANDSCAPE
  
 30) REPEAT COMMENT: THERE ARE INSTANCES WHERE TREES ARE
 FAILED TO BE PROVIDED WITHIN LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AS
 REQUIRED BY THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 31) YOU MAY NOT HAVE 140+ GAPS OF NO BUFFER TREES ALONG
 I-95.
  
 32) THE TWO DETENTION AREAS ALONG EXECUTIVE CENTER
 DRIVE ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED AS A BIOSWALE AND NOT JUST
 A STANDARD DEPRESSION WITH BAHIA GRASS IN ORDER TO
 PROVIDE THE ENHANCED THE PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE ALONG
 EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE THAT HAS BEEN PART OF THE
 ORIGINAL BRANDSMART CPD APPROVAL.
  
 33) THE LANDSCAPE MATERIAL ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE
 BRANDSMART BUILDING MUST PROVIDE A SOLID SCREEN TO SIX
 (6) FEET IN HEIGHT IN LIEU OF PROVIDING ARCHITECTURAL
 ENHANCEMENTS TO THE FACADE.
  
 34) YOUR RECENT SURVEY SHOWS THAT THE STORMWATER LINE
 FROM BEST BUY IS NOT WITHIN THE PORTION OF THE DRAINAGE
 EASEMENT SHOWN ON THE BRANDSMART SITE. YOU NEED TO
 CONFIRM WHAT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS
 ON THE BRANDSMART SITE (IF DIFFERENT FROM THE SURVEY)?
 THE NON-EXCLUSIVE OUTFALL DRAINAGE EASEMENT RECORDED IN
 ORB 11870 PG 300 INCLUDES PROVISIONS FOR TERMINATION OF
 THE EASEMENTS OF PORTIONS OF EASEMENTS THAT ARE NO
 LONGER NEEDED. IF NOTHING IS LOCATED WITHIN THE
 EASEMENT, THIS SHOULD BE PURSUED IN ORDER FOR YOU TO
 INSTALL THE CODE COMPLIANT BUFFER LANDSCAPE.
  
 LIGHTING
  
 35) THANK YOU FOR EXTENDING THE PHOTOMETIC CALCULATIONS
 TO THE PROPERTY LINE. THE PLAN SHOWS THAT THERE ARE
 STILL AREAS WHERE THEY EXCEED ONE FOOTCANDLE PAST THE
 PROPERTY LINE, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED AND MUST BE
 CORRECTED.
  
 JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT PROPOSED INDIVIDUAL PARCEL
 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
  
 36) THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT PROPOSES THE
 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SIMILAR TO WHAT WAS DISCUSSED ON
 THE PREVIOUS APPLICATION WHICH HAD FIVE PARCELS AND AN
 INTERNAL ROADWAY. NOW THAT THE PROPOSAL IS TWO PARCELS
 WHICH COMPLY WITH MOST OF THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL
 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, A LIST OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
 IS NOT NECESSARY. THE FEW WAIVERS WILL BE COVERED BY A
 WAIVER TABLE.
  
 CONDITION - PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION, THE FPL MUST
 PROVIDE A RELEASE OF THE EASEMENTS WHICH CONFLICT WITH
 THE PROPOSED BJS BUILDING.
  
 CONDITION - ALL TRANSFORMERS MUST BE SCREENED.
  
 CONDITION - ALL ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MUST BE
 SCREENED TO THE FULL HEIGHT OF THE EQUIPMENT.
  
 CONDITION - CROSS UTILITY AGREEMENTS/EASEMENTS WILL BE
 REQUIRED.
  
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-10-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 12-10-2020 Time 12:47 Rev Time 5.00
Received By eschneid Date 12-10-2020 Time 12:43 Sent To  
Notes
2020-12-10 12:47:58CASE NO. PB1060MM
 BJ'S @ BRANDSMART
 751 WEST EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,
 [email protected]
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR
 (4) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON THURSDAY,
 DECEMBER 23, 2020, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR
 THE FEBRUARY 16, 2021 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS/THE PPRC MEETING (BY
 FEBRUARY 10, 2020), THE PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY
 THE APPLICANT THAT THE CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN.
 ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 GENERAL
  
 1) INSUFFICIENT JUSTIFICATION WAS PROVIDED AS TO WHY
 STAFF SHOULD SUPPORT THE WAIVERS THAT ARE REQUESTED.
 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WAIVERS ARE TO ENCOURAGE THE USE OF
 INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES TO
 CREATE MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT IN THE
 CITY. THE ITEMS LISTED BELOW ARE STATED AS THE
 INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES
 FROM THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AND STAFF'S RESPONSE:
  
 A. PROPOSED INTERCONNECTIVITY TO THE ADJACENT SITE ****
 THERE IS NO INTERCONNECTIVITY DESIGNED INTO THE SITE
 PLAN AT THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY. ADDITIONALLY, THE DESIGN
 OF THE TRAFFIC PATTERN WOULD NOT PERMIT VEHICLES FROM
 THE BRANDSMART SITE TO SAFELY ACCESS THE ADJACENT SITE.
 THIS WILL BE DISCUSSED IN DEPTH LATER IN THE COMMENTS.
 B. SIGNIFICANTLY UPGRADING THE LANDSCAPED OPEN SPACE
 **** THE LANDSCAPE ARE REQUIRED BY ORDINANCE NO.
 3122-98 IS PROPOSED TO HAVE ALL OF THE EXISTING MATURE
 TREES REMOVED AND REPLACED BY CODE REQUIRED MINIMUM
 SIZE TREES AS WELL AS BEING REDUCED IN AREA BY OVER
 60%. THIS IS NOT A SIGNIFICANT UPGRADE, BUT RATHER A
 DOWNGRADE IN THE LANDSCAPE OPEN SPACE.
 OFFERING A NEW PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY PARK AREA **** THE
 PROPOSED PARK, WITH THE SEAT WALL, SHADE TREES,
 BENCHES, LIGHTED BOLLARDS DECORATIVE CONCRETE PATH AND
 PAVER PLAZA DO NOT OFF SET THE NON-INNOVATIVE LAND
 PLANNING DESIGN THAT IS PROPOSED AND THE WAIVERS
 REQUIRED BY THE DESIGN.
 C. INCLUDE OVERALL DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR THE INFILL AND
 REDEVELOPMENT OF THE PCD **** THE CREATION OF DESIGN
 GUIDELINES THAT INCLUDE THE WAIVERS IS NOT A
 JUSTIFICATION FOR THE WAIVERS REQUESTED.
 D. REDUCE THE IMPACT OF THE REQUESTED PCD WAIVERS BY
 NEW PROJECT DESIGN GUIDELINES **** THE PROPOSED DESIGN
 GUIDELINES RESTATE THE WAIVERS AND DO NOT REDUCE THEIR
 IMPACT.
 E. CREATE A POA FOR THE OVERALL MAINTENANCE CARE AND
 UPKEEP OF THE NEW COMMON AREAS **** CREATING A POA FOR
 COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE IS NOT INNOVATIVE AND SHOULD BE
 A GIVEN FOR ANY COMMERCIAL PROJECT.
 F. THE SITE'S REDEVELOPMENT WILL BRING ADDITIONAL AD
 VALOREM TAX BASE TO THE CITY **** ADDITIONAL AD VALOREM
 TAX BASE IS NOT AN INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING DEVELOPMENT
 TECHNIQUE AND DOES NOT RESULT IN DESIRABLE AND
 ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT.
 G. THE OVERALL PROJECT WILL BE AN ECONOMIC VALUE-ADDED
 ADDITION TO THE CITY'S CONTINUED ECONOMIC SUCCESS ****
 AN ECONOMIC VALUE-ADDED PROJECT NOT AN INNOVATIVE LAND
 PLANNING DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUE AND DOES NOT RESULT IN
 DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT.
  
 2) THE PROPOSED SITE DESIGN DOES NOT INCLUDE THE USE OF
 SUFFICIENT INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
 TECHNIQUES TO CREATE A DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE
 DEVELOPMENT TO JUSTIFY THE GRANTING OF THE REQUESTED
 WAIVERS.
  
 3) STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE PROPOSED DESIGN AS
 PROPOSED. THE CITY'S DESIGN VISION ALONG EXECUTIVE
 CENTER DRIVE IS FOR BUILDINGS TO ADDRESS THE STREET AND
 HAVE FRONT DOORS FACING THE STREET. WHILE THE
 BRANDSMART BUILDING DOES NOT MEET THIS STANDARD,
 ORDINANCE NO. 3122-98 CONTEMPLATED THE CONSTRUCTION OF
 A RETAIL AREA TO ACHIEVE THIS GOAL. THE OPEN LANDSCAPED
 OPEN SPACE EXISTS WITH HE GOAL OF IT EVENTUALLY HAVING
 AN INFILL BUILDING. IF THIS DOES NOT OCCUR, THE AREA IS
 REQUIRED TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE, WHICH WAS
 INSTALLED. THE REMOVAL OF THE MATURE LANDSCAPE AND THE
 REDUCTION IN AREA OF THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREA TO THE
 EAST OF THE BRANDSMART BUILDING AND ITS REPLACEMENT
 WITH PARKING IS IN OPPOSITION WITH THE ORIGINAL
 APPROVED DESIGN.
  
 4) THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE REAR OF THE PROPOSED BJ'S
 BUILDING, INCLUDING PARKING AND THE GENERATORS ALONG
 EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE ALSO DO NOT SUPPORT THE CITY'S
 DESIGN VISION ALONG EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE FOR
 NEIGHBORHOOD ORIENTED COMMERCIAL USES WHICH ADDRESS THE
 STREET AND HAVE FRONT DOORS FACING THE STREET. MOVING
 THE BJ'S IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE WOULD NOT
 CREATE A NEGATIVE STREET FRONTAGE ALONG EXECUTIVE
 DRIVE. THIS WOULD THEN PERMIT A FUTURE BUILDING
 ORIENTED TOWARD EXECUTIVE DRIVE TO BE INSTALLED IN THE
 NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE.
  
 5) SITE A1 AND SITE A2 ARE TWO DISTINCT PARCELS AND THE
 OPEN SPACE, FLOOR AREA RATIO, LANDSCAPE AREA,
 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE, ETC. MUST BE CALCULATED SEPARATELY
 FOR EACH ONE.
  
 6) PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS, INCLUDING THE HEIGHT OF THE
 PROPOSED TRANSFORMERS. THE TRANSFORMERS MUST BE
 SCREENED WITH A LANDSCAPE HEDGE FROM EXECUTIVE CENTER
 DRIVE.
  
 7) PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS, INCLUDING THE HEIGHT OF THE
 PROPOSED GENERATORS. NOTE: THE GENERATORS MAY NOT BE
 LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE PROPOSED LINEAR PARK OR
 ADJACENT TO EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE. ALL PLANS MUST SHOW
 THE SAME CONDITIONS ONCE THE GENERATORS ARE PROPERLY
 LOCATED.
  
 8) THE PROPANE TANK IS REQUIRED TO BE SCREENED IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 94-315A.
  
 9) PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THE SQUARE FOOTAGE LISTED ON THE
 BUILDING FOOTPRINT DRAWINGS IS LARGER THAN THE SQUARE
 FOOTAGE LISTED AS COVERED BY BUILDINGS IN THE VARIOUS
 AREA BREAKDOWN TABLES.
  
 10) IT IS STAFF?S UNDERSTANDING THAT THE SITE WAS
 CAPPED DUE TO ARSENIC ISSUES WHEN THE BRANDSMART WAS
 ORIGINALLY CONSTRUCTED. PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THE
 EXCAVATION FOR THE NEW UNDERGROUND INFRASTRUCTURE AND
 THE FUTURE ABOVEGROUND FEATURES (NEW LANDSCAPE AREAS,
 BUILDING FOUNDATIONS, ETC.) AND REMOVAL OF THE
 RETENTION AREAS WILL COMPLY WITH THE DEP REGULATIONS.
  
 11) SINCE THE PREVIOUS MAJOR SUBDIVISION REQUEST WAS
 HEARD BY THE PLANNING BOARD, THE NEW SUBDIVISION
 REQUEST REQUIRES A NEW APPLICATION, INCLUDING FEES AND
 REVIEWS.
  
 12) THE FPL LETTER STATES THAT THE PROPOSED BUILDING
 INTERFERES WITH EXISTING UNDERGROUND FACILITIES AND
 ENCROACHES ON THEIR EASEMENTS. HOW IS THIS BEING
 ADDRESSED?
  
 PARKING
  
 13) THE BUILDING DIVISION MUST APPROVE THE PROVISION OF
 A NON-ADA PARKING SPACE CLOSER THAN AN ADA PARKING
 SPACE CLOSEST TO THE TIRE STORE ENTRANCE.
  
 14) PARKING ROWS EXCEEDING 10 SPACES NOT PERMITTED. THE
 ENTIRE PARKING LOT IS BEING REBUILT, SO THERE IS NO
 JUSTIFICATION TO PERMIT MORE THAN THE CODE ALLOWED 10
 SPACES IN A ROW.
  
 15) THE CITY MEASURES THE WIDTH OF PARKING SPACES FROM
 THE CENTER OF THE DOUBLE STRIPE. THE DIMENSION TAGS FOR
 SOME OF THE PARKING SPACES ON THE SITE PLAN ARE
 MEASURED FROM THE OUTSIDE OF ONE STRIPE TO THE CENTER
 OF THE DOUBLE STRIPING ON THE OTHER SIDE, WHICH
 INCORRECTLY SHOWS THE STALL WIDTHS. SHOW DIMENSION
 LINES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY REQUIREMENTS SO STAFF
 CAN VERIFY COMPLIANCE. NOTE: THIS IS CORRECTLY SHOWN ON
 THE STRIPING PLAN.
  
 16) THE DIMENSION WIDTH OF SOME OF THE PARKING SPACES
 ON THE NORTH AND EAST SIDES OF THE PROPOSED BJ'S AND
 THE EAST SIDE OF THE BRANDSMART ARE LISTED AS EIGHT (8)
 FEET. ARE THESE PROPOSED TO BE COMPACT PARKING SPACES?
 IF SO THEN THEY NEED TO BE DESIGNATED ON THE PLAN AND
 PROVIDED ON THE PARKING TABLE.
  
 17) WHERE THERE IS NOT PLANNED TO BE A VEHICLE OVERHANG
 AT THE FRONT OF THE PARKING SPACES, WHEEL STOPS MUST BE
 PROVIDED AND SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
  
 18) THERE ARE FOUR PARKING SPACES SOUTH OF THE
 BRANDSMART THAT ARE SHOW AS 15.9 FEET DEEP WITH AN
 OVERHANG. SPACES MUST BE 16 FEET DEEP IN THIS
 SITUATION. NOTE: THIS IS NOT THE SAME DIMENSION SHOWN
 ON THE STRIPING PLAN. ALL PLANS MUST SHOW THE SAME
 CONDITIONS.
  
 19) THERE ARE THREE PARKING SPACES IN EAST OF THE
 BRANDSMART (IN THE ROW WITH 13 SPACES) THAT ARE NOT 18
 FEET DEEP.
  
 20) THE EAST-WEST PARKING ROW CLOSEST TO THE FUEL PUMPS
 IS INCORRECTLY TAGGED WITH 12 PARKING SPACES WHEN ONLY
 10 ARE PROVIDED.
  
 21) PROVIDE VERIFICATION OF THE PARKING SPACE WIDTH ON
 THE PARKING ROW DUE SOUTH OF THE BRANDSMART ENTRANCE
 WHERE ONE OF THE SPACES IS NARROWER THAN THE ONE ACROSS
 FROM IT (NEXT TO THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND).
  
 22) COMPACT PARKING MAY OCCUPY NO MORE THAN 30% OF THE
 REQUIRED PARKING SPACES, BE MARKED, AND NEED TO BE
 DISTRIBUTED EQUALLY THROUGHOUT THE PARKING LOT. THEY
 MAY NOT ALL BE CONCENTRATED AS SHOWN.
  
 23) THE PARKING SPACES MARKED AS "PROPANE PARKING ONLY"
 MAY NOT BE COUNTED TOWARD MEETING THE MINIMUM PARKING
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 24) PARKING PROVIDED
  
 A. STAFF ONLY COUNTS 812 PARKING SPACES ON SITE (AFTER
 REMOVAL OF THE 4 PROPONE ONLY SPACES).
  
 B. IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 94-485B.2 ONLY ON-STREET
 PARKING SPACES DIRECTLY AND WHOLLY ABUTTING THE
 PROPERTY MAY BE COUNTED TOWARDS THE PARKING
 REQUIREMENT. ONLY 12 ON STREET PARKING SPACES MEET THIS
 REQUIREMENT, NOT 42.
  
 C. THERE ARE ONLY 824 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED FOR THE
 PROJECT. NOTE: SITE REDESIGN TO COMPLY WITH OTHER
 COMMENTS MAY REDUCE THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES
 PROVIDED.
  
 25) PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THE SQUARE FOOTAGE LISTED ON THE
 BUILDING FOOTPRINT DRAWINGS IS LARGER THAN THE SQUARE
 FOOTAGE LISTED FOR EACH BUILDING IN THE PARKING
 TABULATION TABLE. BASED ON THE BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE
 SHOWN ON THE BUILDING FOOTPRINTS, STAFF CALCULATES THAT
 883 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED. BASED ON THIS
 CALCULATION, THERE IS A DEFICIENCY OF 59 PARKING SPACES
 ON THE SITE PLAN AS CURRENTLY SHOWN.
  
 26) CROSS UTILITY AGREEMENTS/EASEMENTS WILL BE
 REQUIRED.
  
 SITE CIRCULATION
  
 27) THE CROSS ACCESS POINT NEEDS TO BE SHOWN ON THE
 PLANS AND CONSTRUCTED TO THE PROPERTY LINE SO THAT WHEN
 THE ADJOINING SITE IS REDEVELOPED, THEIR SIDE OF THE
 DRIVE CAN BE DIRECTLY TIED IN TO THE CONNECTION. THE
 LANDSCAPE NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY.
  
 28) THE DESIGN OF THE SITE DOES NOT SAFELY PERMIT
 CUSTOMERS FROM THE BRANDSMART/BJ'S SITE TO ACCESS THE
 FUTURE CONNECTION. THE NORTHERN DRIVEWAY IS ONE WAY IN
 A WESTERN DIRECTION, SO IT IS NOT ACCESSIBLE FROM THE
 PARKING LOT IN FRONT OF THE TIRE SHOP. THE PARKING
 FIELD ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE BJ'S BUILDING DOES NOT
 PERMIT SAFE ENTRANCE FROM THE SOUTH SIDE FOR CUSTOMERS
 USING THE EGRESS DRIVE TO EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE. THESE
 DRIVERS WOULD BE FORCED TO CROSS THE INCOMING TRAFFIC
 FLOW WITHOUT HAVING A CLEAR LINE OF SIGHT TO VERIFY
 THAT THE TURNING MOVEMENT IS SAFE. THE DESIGN ALSO
 ENCOURAGES CUSTOMERS TO LEAVE THE SITE AND TRANSITION
 BACK TO THE ADJACENT PARCELS VIA LEFT TURN MOVEMENTS
 ACROSS EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE. THIS MOVEMENT ALSO
 EXACERBATES THE QUEUING DEFICIENCY THAT PALM BEACH
 COUNTY MENTIONED IN THEIR TPS LETTER. THE SITE NEEDS TO
 BE REDESIGNED TO PROVIDE SAFE ACCESS TO THE CROSS
 ACCESS POINT.
  
 29) WHERE IS BRANDSMART DUMPSTER? SHOW THE SANITATION
 TRUCK VEHICLE MOVEMENTS TO SHOW HOW IT IS PICKED UP.
  
 30) PROVIDE THE TRUCK TURNING MOVEMENTS FOR THE FUEL
 TRUCKS TO THE GAS STATION AND THE LOADING AREAS FOR
 BJ?S AND BRANDSMART.
  
 31) PROVIDE INFORMATION AND A DETAIL OF HOW THE FUEL
 STATION STACKING IS EXPECTED TO FUNCTION. THE CURRENT
 PLAN APPEARS TO BE CONFIGURED IN SUCH A WAY THAT CARS
 WILL BE STACKING INTO THE DRIVE AISLE, WHICH IS NOT
 PERMITTED.
  
 SIGNAGE
  
 32) THE EXISTING BRANDSMART SIGN IS SHOWN ON BOTH THE
 SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS IN ITS CURRENT LOCATION.
 HOWEVER, THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS A TREE PLANTED ON TOP
 OF THE SIGN OUTLINE. PLEASE EXPLAIN. THIS PARKING
 ISLAND REQUIRES A CODE COMPLIANT TREE REGARDLESS OF
 WHETHER THE SIGN REMAINS OR IS REMOVED.
  
 33) PROVIDE WHAT THE BJ?S FUEL STATION DIRECTIONAL
 SIGNS WILL LOOK LIKE. PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE SIGNS ARE
 PROPOSED TO INCLUDE BJ?S COPY, THEN THEY ARE CONSIDERED
 FREE STANDING SIGNS AND ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE
 FREESTANDING SIGN REQUIREMENTS.
  
 34) PROVIDE A GRAPHIC SHOWING THE SIZE AND HEIGHT OF
 THE EXISTING MONUMENT SIGNS THAT ARE PROPOSED TO BE
 RELOCATED ALONG EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE.
  
 35) PROVIDE THE SETBACKS FOR THE RELOCATED MONUMENT
 SIGNS FROM EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE.
  
 36) PROVIDE THE SETBACKS AND SIZE OF THE MONUMENT SIGNS
 ALONG I-95, BOTH THE EXISTING AND THE PROPOSED SIGN.
  
 37) THE SIGN REGULATIONS ONLY PERMIT ONE WALL SIGN PER
 BUSINESS PLUS TWO ADDITIONAL SIGNS. THE BJ'S ELEVATIONS
 SHOW THAT THIS IS EXCEEDED.
  
 38) PROVIDE THE SIZE OF THE PROPOSED WALL SIGNS SO THAT
 STAFF CAN VERIFY CODE COMPLIANCE.
  
 39) PARKING AREA INSTRUCTIONAL AND RELATED SIGNS ARE
 ONLY PERMITTED TO HAVE A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF SIX (6)
 FEET. THE PLANS SHOW THE PROPANE AND TIRE STORE SIGNS
 AT GREATER THAN SIX (6) FEET IN HEIGHT. THIS STANDARD
 ALSO APPLIES TO THE MEMBER WITH INFANT SIGNS.
  
 ELEVATIONS
  
 40) WHILE STAFF IS NOT SUPPORTIVE OF THE CURRENT SITE
 LAYOUT, IF YOU PLAN TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THIS GENERAL
 SITE PLAN, THE ELEVATION ALONG EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE
 NEEDS TO BE IMPROVED.
  
 41) WHAT IS OCCURRING IN THE BJ'S TOWER? IS THIS USABLE
 SQUARE FOOTAGE?
  
 42) PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE PARAPET WALLS FOR BJ'S.
 THESE MUST BE OF SUFFICIENT HEIGHT TO SCREEN THE
 ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT FROM THE NEIGHBORING
 PROPERTIES, TO INCLUDE THE MALIBU BAY RESIDENTIAL
 PROPERTY ACROSS EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE.
  
 43) PROVIDE THE ELEVATIONS FOR THE FUEL STATION
 ELEVATIONS. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE LIGHTING UNDER THE
 CANOPY NEEDS TO BE RECESSED SO THAT NO GLARE IS CAST
 OFF-SITE.
  
 44) PROVIDE THE SETBACK DIMENSION FOR THE NORTH SIDE OF
 THE FUEL STATION CANOPY STRUCTURE.
  
 LANDSCAPE
  
 45) THERE ARE INSTANCES WHERE TREES ARE FAILED TO BE
 PROVIDED WITHIN LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AS REQUIRED BY THE
 ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
  
 46) THERE ARE INSTANCES WHERE THE LIGHTS APPEAR TO
 CONFLICT WITH THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE ISLAND TREES,
 WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED.
  
 47) THE AREA BREAKDOWN TABLE FAILED TO PROVIDE
 INFORMATION ON THE AMOUNT OF LANDSCAPE ON THE OVERALL
 SITE OR FOR INDIVIDUAL PARCELS. PLEASE NOTE THAT WHILE
 THE DRY DETENTION AREAS DO NOT COUNT AS OPEN SPACE,
 THEY ARE NOT PERMITTED TO COUNT TOWARD MEETING THE 15%
 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT. ADDITIONALLY, SINCE THE
 DETENTION AREA IS LINED, IT IS NOT PERVIOUS AND MUST BE
 EXCLUDED FROM THE PERVIOUS CALCULATION.
  
 LIGHTING
  
 48) THE PHOTOMETIC CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE CONTINUED TO
 THE PROPERTY LINE AND MAY NOT EXCEED ONE FOOTCANDLE
 PAST THE PROPERTY LINE.
  
 JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT PROPOSED INDIVIDUAL PARCEL
 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
  
 49) THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT PROPOSES THE
 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS THAT FOLLOW. STAFF HAS INCLUDED A
 RESPONSE TO THE PROPOSALS.
  
 LANDSCAPED AREA: EACH INDIVIDUAL PARCEL SHALL PROVIDE A
 MINIMUM OF 10% LANDSCAPED AREA. THE OVERALL MINIMUM PCD
 LANDSCAPED AREA SHALL BE 15%. ***** WHILE THIS MIRRORS
 THE PREVIOUS DEVELOPMENT STANDARD THAT STAFF SUPPORTED,
 THE PREVIOUS SUPPORT WAS BASED ON THE MITIGATION
 PROVIDED FOR THE REQUESTED WAIVER TO THE INDIVIDUAL
 PARCEL LANDSCAPE MINIMUM. THE DESIGN OF THE SITE DOES
 NOT JUSTIFY STAFF SUPPORT OF THIS WAIVER REQUEST.
 PERIMETER PARCEL BUFFER: EACH INDIVIDUAL PARCEL SHALL
 PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF A FIVE (5) LANDSCAPED BUFFER
 AROUND THE PERIMETER OF EACH PARCEL EXCEPT WHEN
 ADJACENT TO AN EXISTING WATER BODY OR THE I-95
 RIGHT-OF-WAY. ***** STAFF WILL NOT SUPPORT A BUFFER
 REDUCTION AT ANY POINT ALONG THE PERIMETER OF THE SITE.
 ENCROACHMENTS: LANDSCAPED BUFFERS MAY ENCROACH INTO
 EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENTS. ***** THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER
 MUST BE INSTALLED OUTSIDE OF ANY UTILITY EASEMENTS TO
 ENSURE THAT THERE WILL ALWAYS BE A BUFFER IN THE EVENT
 THAT THE UTILITY HOLDER FORCES THE REMOVAL OF LANDSCAPE
 FROM THE EASEMENT. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT.
 PERIMETER PARCEL BUFFER LANDSCAPING: EACH INDIVIDUAL
 PARCEL SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF A CONTINUOUS HEDGE
 MATERIAL PLANTED 24 INCHES IN HEIGHT AROUND THE
 PERIMETER OF EACH PARCEL EXCEPT WHEN ADJACENT TO AN
 EXISTING WATER BODY, I-95 RIGHT-OF-WAY OR INTERNAL
 PARCEL. ***** STAFF WILL NOT SUPPORT HAVING A CODE
 COMPLIANT 36 INCH HIGH HEDGE AROUND THE ENTIRE
 PERIMETER OF THE SITE.
 PCD LANDSCAPE BUFFER: A MINIMUM FIVE (5) FOOT
 LANDSCAPED BUFFER SHALL BE PROVIDED AROUND THE
 PERIMETER OF THE ENTIRE PCD. ***** THIS IS STAFF?S
 POSITION BUT IS CONTRADICTED BY AN EARLIER REGULATION
 YOU PROPOSED.
 MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE: EACH INDIVIDUAL PARCEL SHALL BE
 PERMITTED A MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE OF %. THE OVERALL
 MAXIMUM PCD LOT COVERAGE SHALL NOT EXCEED %. *****
 STAFF IS UNABLE TO RESPOND SINCE NO INFORMATION
 PROVIDED. STAFF COULD SUPPORT ITS PREVIOUS POSITION:
 MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY BUILDINGS: 60 PERCENT FOR THE
 ENTIRE BRANDSMART COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT;
 HOWEVER INDIVIDUAL PARCELS MAY HAVE UP TO 75 PERCENT
 LOT COVERAGE BY BUILDINGS.
 EASEMENTS: EASEMENTS SHALL NOT BE USED TO MEET THE
 MINIMUM LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS. ***** THIS IS
 STAFF?S POSITION BUT IS CONTRADICTED BY AN EARLIER
 REGULATION YOU PROPOSED.
 FOUNDATION PLANTINGS: FOUNDATIONS PLANTINGS SHALL BE
 REQUITED AND CAN BE APPROVED FOR EACH PARCEL ON A CASE
 BY CASE BASIS. ***** THE 30% FOUNDATION PLANTING MUST
 BE MET FOR ALL BUILDINGS AS PART OF THE REDEVELOPMENT.
 PARCEL SETBACKS: ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO
 THE APPLICABLE SETBACKS AS CONTAINED WITHIN THE GENERAL
 COMMERCIAL (GC) ZONING DISTRICT. ***** STAFF AGREES.
 GENERAL SETBACKS: ALL PARCELS WITH THE PCD SHALL COMPLY
 WITH THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) ZONING DISTRICT
 SETBACKS BASED UPON THE FRONTAGE ESTABLISHED ON THE
 MASTER PLAN. ***** STAFF AGREES.
 CROSS PARKING: A CROSS PARKING EASEMENT IS CREATED FOR
 THE ENTRE POA. THE OVERALL MINIMUM NUMBER OF PARKING
 SPACES SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR ALL COMBINED USES
 CONTAINED WITHIN THE PCD. ***** STAFF AGREES.
 BUILDING HEIGHT: EACH INDIVIDUAL PARCEL SHALL BE
 PERMITTED A MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT OF FIFTY (50) FEET.
 PARCEL ONE (1) SHALL BE EXEMPT FROM THE THIS STANDARD
 UNLESS AND UNTIL PARCEL 1 IS REDEVELOPED. ***** STAFF
 DOES NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT IS BEING REQUESTED HERE. THE
 PROPOSED BJ'S (SITE A1) IS OVER 50 FEET IN HEIGHT.
 FLOOR AREA RATIO: THE MAXIMUM OVERALL PCD FLOOR AREA
 RATIO (FAR) IS 1.0. NO INDIVIDUAL PARCEL SHALL EXCEED
 AN FAR OF 2.0. ***** WHILE THIS MIRRORS THE PREVIOUS
 DEVELOPMENT STANDARD THAT STAFF SUPPORTED, THE PREVIOUS
 SUPPORT WAS BASED ON THE MITIGATION PROVIDED FOR THE
 REQUESTED WAIVER TO THE INDIVIDUAL PARCEL LANDSCAPE
 MINIMUM. THE DESIGN OF THE SITE DOES NOT JUSTIFY STAFF
 SUPPORT OF THIS WAIVER REQUEST.
 GENERAL PCD STANDARDS: ANY DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS NOT
 SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED HEREIN SHALL COMPLY, TO THE
 GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE, TO THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL
 (GC) ZONING REGULATIONS. ***** STAFF AGREES.
  
 50) NOTE: NO WAIVER FOR PARKING BACKING INTO STREET
 SINCE NOT ROW PARCEL BEING PROPOSED. ALL 3 PARCELS AS
 DESIGNED FRONT ON AN ROW SO NO INTERNAL ROW PARCEL IS
 REQUIRED.
  
 51) NO BICYCLE PARKING WAS PROVIDED TO MEET CODE FOR
 THE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED.
  
  
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved