Plan Review Details - Project Z20070009
Plan Review Stops For Project Z20070009
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-12-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 08-12-2020 Time 20:21 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 08-12-2020 Time 20:21 Sent To  
Notes
2020-08-12 20:33:57DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THE PARKING
 DATA TABLE ON SITE PLAN SHEET S1 STATES THAT A TOTAL OF
 217 PARKING SPACE WILL BE PROVIDED BUT THAT IS LESS
 THAN THE SUM STATED NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES IN THE
 SAME TABLE FOR THE EXISTING OFFICE (67 SPACES), THE
 WAREHOUSE (6 SPACES) AND THE PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING
 (186 SPACES). THE TABLE MUST BE CORRECTED AND
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED COMMENSURATE WITH
 THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF PARKIG SPACES PROPOSED. THE
 MINIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED
 SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 208.2 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE.
  
 3. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PER SECTION
 208.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING
 SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE
 OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE
 ENTRANCE. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL
 COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE
  
 4. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 5. THE ADDITION OF THE SERVICE BAY TO THE EXISTING
 OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE BUILDING IS COVERED BY CHAPTER 11
 OF THE FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING CODE. THE HEIGHT
 AND/OR AREA INCREASE DUE TO THE PROPOSED ADDITION SHALL
 NOT INCREASE THE TOTAL BUILDING HEIGHT AND/OR AREA
 BEYOND THAT ALLOWED UNDER THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF
 CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE FOR THE TYPE OF
 CONSTRUCTION USED.
  
 6. GREASE/OIL INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE/OIL INTERCEPTOR MAY
 BE REQUIRED FOR THE SERVICE BAY. FOR INFORMATION ON THE
 REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT TIM
 LARGE, CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT, AT (561) 805-6692, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 7. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS,
 FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS,
 GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE,
 SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 8. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
 WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
 HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT
 CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT (561) 805
 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 9. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
 TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE
 ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status P Date 10-16-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By RROSSANO Date 10-16-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 10-16-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-06-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 08-06-2020 Time   Rev Time  
Received By rrossano Date 08-06-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-08-06 09:33:191. PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC
 RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF
 YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
 MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
 IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
 [email protected] OR 561-494-1040 FOR FURTHER
 ASSISTANCE.
 2. PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS
 OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES,
 INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND
 SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES,
 METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE
 SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING
 GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS,
 ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL
 INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER
 LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN
 VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
 PLEASE SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT
 MATERIAL. ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL
 EXISTING AND PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT,
 INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &
 TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL
 UTILITY CROSSINGS.
 3. SHOW VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION INFORMATION
 (NAVD 88 AND NGVD 29).
 4. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND
 IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED
 AREAS.
 5. PLEASE ADD ADDRESS TO PLANS.
  
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS.
 RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT
 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 08-05-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 08-05-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 08-05-2020 Time 15:36 Sent To  
Notes
2020-08-05 15:43:40THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE
 OCCUPANCY TYPE, PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 AND WHETHER THE SERVICE BAY WILL BE MIXED OR SEPARATED
 OCCUPANCY.
  
 6A. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, THERE IS A A ROOF
 SITTING AREA WITH ONNE STAIRWELL EXIT. THIS IS AN
 ASSEMBLY OCCUPANY SPACE AND TWO EXITS WOULD BE
 REQUIRED. PLEASE ENSURE THAT A REVIEW OF NFPA 101 ,
 CHAPTER 12 NEW ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCIES AND CHAPTER 7,
 MEANS OF EGRESS FOR EXITING REQUIREMENTS.
  
 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE
 LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER
 SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED.
  
 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 THE LOCATIONS OF THE FIRE HYDRANT AND FDC ARE
 ACCEPTABLE WITH ANY CHANGES CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH
 THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER
 THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE FOR THE NEW BUILDING. FOR
 ANY LIFE SAFETY ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER
 AND FIRE ALARM, ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF FS 61G AND SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER
 PERMIT.
  
 9A) THE LOCATION OF ANY APPLICABLE DDCV AND FIRE LINE
 LOCATIONS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND
 SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL,
 THE CITY'S ENGINEERS OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND
 THE CITY'S PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE.
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
 EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
 PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
 SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE
 SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY
 GATES LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 12. THE BUREAU'S REVIEW OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES
 NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 5 Status P Date 05-03-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 05-03-2021 Time 16:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 05-03-2021 Time 16:06 Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-03 16:07:06FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: HULETT CPD Z20070009
 MAY 3, 2021
 THE RESUBMITTED DESIGN HAS CHANGED SUBSTANTIALLY, SO
 NEW COMMENTS ARE PLACED AT THE END OF THE MEMO.
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO TREE
 DISPOSITION CHART SHEET L2:
 ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CANOPY DIAMETERS FOR ALL
 TREES.
 ? SATISFIED. IF CANOPY DIAMETERS ARE 20 FEET OR MORE,
 CALCULATE THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE AND ENTER INTO THE
 MITIGATION DUE COLUMN IF PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL. IF UNDER
 20 FEET, THE SQUARE FOOTAGE IS BASED ON THE CATEGORY
 FOR THE TREE. ADD A COLUMN FOR THE CANOPY SQUARE
 FOOTAGE FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS.
  
 ? SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN AND LIST THE CATEGORY FOR
 EACH TREE AND PALM FROM THE CITY REFERENCE LIST.
 SABAL PALMS ARE CATEGORY 3, CORRECT ON LIST. #53 IS 100
 SQ FT MITIGATION DUE FOR CATEGORY 3 REMOVAL.
  
 ? SATISFIED. REMOVE EXISTING ?UNIDENTIFIED TREE TO BE
 REMOVED? FROM THE TREE ACTION LEGEND LIST, AS ALL TREES
 MUST BE PROPERLY IDENTIFIED.
 ? SATISFIED. REMOVE NOTE REFERENCING DBH.
 ? SATISFIED. ASSIGN NUMBERS AND INCLUDE TREE AND 5
 PALMS SHOWN IN RED ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE.
 ? SATISFIED. CHANGE TREE CREDITS COLUMN TO MITIGATION
 DUE, AND LIST SQUARE FOOTAGE IF MITIGATION IS DUE.
 ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF
 MITIGATION DUE AND SHOW MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE
 PROVIDED FROM THE PROPOSED TREE LIST AFTER ALL
 CORRECTIONS.
 ADJUST TOTAL FOR ALL MITIGATION DUE TO INCLUDE PALMS
 AND CORRECTED PALM TOTAL.
 SHOULD BE 11,548 SQ FT.
  
 ? SATISFIED. INCLUDE A LIST OF ALL SPECIES AND
 QUANTITIES COUNTED TOWARD MITIGATION BASED ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN, NOT INCLUDING REPLACEMENTS FOR MISSING
 APPROVED TREES AND PALMS.
 MITIGATION IS SHORT 148 SQ FT.
  
 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
 EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
 POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE CONDITION FOR ALL EXISTING
 TREES AND PALMS AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE
 TREES AND PALMS BASED ON A CERTIFIED ARBORISTS REPORT.
  
 3. SATISFIED. EXPLAIN THE DIFFERENCE IN PERVIOUS AREA
 AND LANDSCAPE AREA SQUARE FOOTAGE.
 ANSWER TO COMMENT ADDRESSES PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS
 AREAS. THE QUESTION WAS REFERENCING THE DISCREPANCY
 SHOWN BETWEEN THE PERVIOUS AREA SQUARE FOOTAGE AND THE
 LANDSCAPE AREA SQUARE FOOTAGE LISTED ON THE LANDSCAPE
 CODE DATA CHART. THIS HAS BEEN CORRECTED TO SHOW THEY
 ARE NOW THE SAME SQUARE FOOTAGE.
  
 4. SATISFIED. REMOVE ?S. DIXIE HWY.? FROM WEST PROPERTY
 LINE BUFFER REFERENCE.
  
 5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE FOUNDATION PLANTING
 CALCULATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR EACH BUILDING.
  
 6. SATISFIED. THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN FROM RES. NO.
 266-12 EXHIBIT D IS THE APPROVED PLAN OF RECORD, AND
 THIS IS AN AMENDMENT TO THAT PLAN. ALL AREAS THAT ARE
 NOT BEING ALTERED WITH THIS AMENDMENT NEED TO SHOW THE
 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED LANDSCAPING. THERE ARE NUMEROUS
 TREES AND PALMS MISSING FROM THE EXISTING SITE AND MUST
 BE REPLACED UNLESS THE AREA IS BEING ALTERED.
 MISSING TREES AND PALMS FROM THE APPROVED PLANS MUST BE
 SHOWN AS BEING REPLACED WITH THIS PLAN. ALL EXISTING
 TREES SHOWN MUST BE IDENTIFIED ON THIS PLAN. THERE ARE
 MULTIPLE APPROVED PALMS AND TREES MISSING, ESPECIALLY
 IN THE EASTERN BUFFER. SHEET L3 IS REFERENCED BUT WAS
 NOT SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. ALL EXISTING TREES MUST BE
 IDENTIFIED WITH TAGS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
  
 7. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF
 SUBSTITUTION OF PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES. SECTION
 94-442(D) REQUIRES A 3:1 RATIO FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR
 PALMS EXCEPT THE LISTED 1:1 SPECIES.
  
 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING
 LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS. PROVIDE
 THE TOTAL REQUIRED AND PROVIDED AS ONE TOTAL FOR BOTH
 SECTIONS. A SEPARATE EXHIBIT MAY BE PROVIDED TO
 DEMONSTRATE THE AREAS COUNTED.
 SECTION (4) HAS NOT BEEN CALCULATED AND INCLUDED IN
 TOTAL. PROVIDE A SEPARATE PLAN WITH THE PARKING SPACES,
 OTHER VEHICULAR USE AREAS AND THE PROVIDE INTERIOR
 LANDSCAPE AREAS SHOWN.
  
 9. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443 (C)(3)A. REQUIRES A
 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND AND REQUIRED TREE FOR EACH
 ROW OF PARKING. (3)B. REQUIRES AN INTERIOR LANDSCAPE
 ISLAND WITH A REQUIRED TREE SO THERE ARE NO MORE THAN
 10 SPACES IN A ROW. ALL THESE LANDSCAPE AREAS MUST MEET
 THE MINIMUM WIDTH OF 8 FEET OF LANDSCAPE AREA AND BE
 THE FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT SPACE. ALL
 RECONSTRUCTED AREAS OF PARKING MUST MEET THESE
 REQUIREMENTS, AND THE APPROVED PLAN FOLLOWED FOR
 UNALTERED AREAS.
 TREES HAVE BEEN DOUBLE COUNTED IN SOME ISLANDS,
 INCLUDING 2 ISLANDS SOUTH AND ONE NORTHEAST OF EXISTING
 BUILDING,
  
 TERMINAL ISLAND EAST OF DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DOES NOT
 CONTAIN A TREE.
  
 10. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A
 MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO
 BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING
 AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE
 PERCENTAGE OF CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR THE
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS AS REQUIRED BY SECTION
 94-443(C)(3) FOR DIVIDER ISLANDS, TERMINAL, AND
 INTERIOR ISLANDS.
  
 THE PERCENTAGE IS NOT 100%. THERE ARE FOUR SILVER
 BUTTONWOOD TREES USED AS REQUIRED TREES, AND THEY ARE
 CATEGORY 2. ALL EXISTING TREES MUST ALSO BE IDENTIFIED.
 THEN PROVIDE AN ACCURATE PERCENTAGE.
  
 11. SATISFIED. IN THE PARKING AREAS BEING
 RECONSTRUCTED, STAFF SUGGESTS REDUCING THE PAVED AREAS
 FOR PARKING SPACES AND USING CURBS INSTEAD OF WHEEL
 STOPS TO ALLOW FOR PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA AT THE
 OVERHANG. THIS ALSO ALLOWS MORE LANDSCAPE AREA FOR
 SUPPORTING THE ROOT ZONES OF THE TREES.
 12. SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN TO THE PLANT LIST FOR
 DROUGHT TOLERANT LEVELS OF EACH SPECIES AND WHETHER
 FLORIDA NATIVE.
  
 13. SATISFIED. REVISE THE SECTION IN THE LANDSCAPE DATA
 CHART TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A
 MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE
 FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED
 FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST
 RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT
 DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
 PROVIDE THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT
 TOLERANT PLANTS BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST.
  
 14. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH
 LANDSCAPING.
 THERE APPEARS TO BE A DIRECT CONFLICT WITH A TREE AT
 THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EXISTING BUILDING WITH A
 TRANSFORMER. ADDRESS THIS ISSUE. THE TRANSFORMER AT THE
 NORTHWEST CORNER DOES NOT HAVE SCREENING, AND THE
 REQUIRE TREE IS DISPLACED.
  
 15. SATISFIED. THERE ARE MULTIPLE CONFLICTS BETWEEN
 REQUIRED TREES AND THE PROPOSED WATER LINES, HYDRANTS
 AND BACKFLOW PREVENTERS ON THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
 PLANS. THESE WILL CONFLICT WITH REQUIRED TREES IN THE
 LANDSCAPE AREAS. ALL CHANGES PROPOSED TO PALM BEACH
 COUNTY WATER UTILITY LOCATIONS MUST BE FIRST REVIEWED
 AND APPROVED BY THE CITY TO VERIFY THERE WILL NOT BE
 CHANGES TO THE LANDSCAPE OR SITE PLAN THAT WILL CREATE
 NONCONFORMITIES.
 HYDRANT PROPOSED AT SOUTH END OF EXISTING BUILDING IS
 PLACED SO AS TO LIMIT THE LOCATION OF REQUIRED TREES.
  
 16. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 VALVES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 17. SATISFIED. INDICATE HOW LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE
 DISTRICT WILL ACCESS AREAS OF THE CANAL FOR
 MAINTENANCE. IF THE PREVIOUS GAPS IN THE SOUTH BUFFER
 ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR ACCESS, THE REQUIRED
 PLANTINGS ARE TO BE RESTORED. PROVIDE DISTRICT APPROVAL
 OF ALL LANDSCAPING PROPOSED WITHIN THEIR EASEMENT.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/20/20:
  
 18. SATISFIED. ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY, A
 FENCE IS INDICATED RUNNING THROUGH AN EXISTING TREE.
 ADJUST TO AVOID CONFLICT.
  
 19. SATISFIED. THE LANDSCAPE DIVIDER ISLAND WEST OF THE
 DUMPSTER IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A TREE EVERY 30 FEET PER
 SECTION 94-443(C)(3)C.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 2/4/20:
  
 20. SATISFIED. EAST SIDE OF EXISTING BUILDING:
 LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN, SITE
 PLAN AND CIVIL PLANS SHOW SIDEWALK WHERE TREES ARE
 LOCATED. SIDEWALK LOCATION SHOULD BE AGAINST BUILDING.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 3/25/20 BASED ON THE REVISED SITE
 AND LANDSCAPE PLAN:
  
 21. SATISFIED. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET LP-1 APPROVED
 WITH RESO. 266-12 IS THE PLAN BEING AMENDED, SO ALL
 MISSING LANDSCAPING NEEDS TO BE SHOWN PER THAT PLAN AND
 PROPOSED CHANGES ARE TO BE INDICATED BY CLOUDING. THAT
 MAJOR AMENDMENT APPROVED ADDING THE PARALLEL PARKING
 SPACES ALONG THE ACCESS ROAD, SO THERE ARE MISSING
 TREES AND PALMS, INCLUDING THE REQUIRED TREES AT THE
 ENDS OF THE ROWS OF PARKING.
 22. SATISFIED. THE NEW TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND
 SOUTHWEST OF THE EXISTING BUILDING DOES NOT MEET THE 8
 FOOT WIDTH REQUIREMENT AND IS MISSING THE REQUIRED
 TREE.
  
 23. SATISFIED. MAKE ALL ADJUSTMENTS TO TABLES AND
 CHARTS.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 03-25-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 03-25-2021 Time 11:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 03-25-2021 Time 11:53 Sent To  
Notes
2021-03-25 11:54:20FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: HULETT CPD Z20070009
 MARCH 25, 2021
 THE RESUBMITTED DESIGN HAS CHANGED SUBSTANTIALLY, SO
 NEW COMMENTS ARE PLACED AT THE END OF THE MEMO.
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO TREE
 DISPOSITION CHART SHEET L2:
 ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CANOPY DIAMETERS FOR ALL
 TREES.
 ? SATISFIED. IF CANOPY DIAMETERS ARE 20 FEET OR MORE,
 CALCULATE THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE AND ENTER INTO THE
 MITIGATION DUE COLUMN IF PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL. IF UNDER
 20 FEET, THE SQUARE FOOTAGE IS BASED ON THE CATEGORY
 FOR THE TREE. ADD A COLUMN FOR THE CANOPY SQUARE
 FOOTAGE FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS.
  
 ? SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN AND LIST THE CATEGORY FOR
 EACH TREE AND PALM FROM THE CITY REFERENCE LIST.
 SABAL PALMS ARE CATEGORY 3, CORRECT ON LIST. #53 IS 100
 SQ FT MITIGATION DUE FOR CATEGORY 3 REMOVAL.
  
 ? SATISFIED. REMOVE EXISTING ?UNIDENTIFIED TREE TO BE
 REMOVED? FROM THE TREE ACTION LEGEND LIST, AS ALL TREES
 MUST BE PROPERLY IDENTIFIED.
 ? SATISFIED. REMOVE NOTE REFERENCING DBH.
 ? SATISFIED. ASSIGN NUMBERS AND INCLUDE TREE AND 5
 PALMS SHOWN IN RED ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE.
 ? SATISFIED. CHANGE TREE CREDITS COLUMN TO MITIGATION
 DUE, AND LIST SQUARE FOOTAGE IF MITIGATION IS DUE.
 ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF
 MITIGATION DUE AND SHOW MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE
 PROVIDED FROM THE PROPOSED TREE LIST AFTER ALL
 CORRECTIONS.
 ADJUST TOTAL FOR ALL MITIGATION DUE TO INCLUDE PALMS
 AND CORRECTED PALM TOTAL.
 SHOULD BE 11,548 SQ FT.
  
 ? SATISFIED. INCLUDE A LIST OF ALL SPECIES AND
 QUANTITIES COUNTED TOWARD MITIGATION BASED ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN, NOT INCLUDING REPLACEMENTS FOR MISSING
 APPROVED TREES AND PALMS.
 MITIGATION IS SHORT 148 SQ FT.
  
 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
 EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
 POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE CONDITION FOR ALL EXISTING
 TREES AND PALMS AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE
 TREES AND PALMS BASED ON A CERTIFIED ARBORISTS REPORT.
  
 3. SATISFIED. EXPLAIN THE DIFFERENCE IN PERVIOUS AREA
 AND LANDSCAPE AREA SQUARE FOOTAGE.
 ANSWER TO COMMENT ADDRESSES PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS
 AREAS. THE QUESTION WAS REFERENCING THE DISCREPANCY
 SHOWN BETWEEN THE PERVIOUS AREA SQUARE FOOTAGE AND THE
 LANDSCAPE AREA SQUARE FOOTAGE LISTED ON THE LANDSCAPE
 CODE DATA CHART. THIS HAS BEEN CORRECTED TO SHOW THEY
 ARE NOW THE SAME SQUARE FOOTAGE.
  
 4. SATISFIED. REMOVE ?S. DIXIE HWY.? FROM WEST PROPERTY
 LINE BUFFER REFERENCE.
  
 5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE FOUNDATION PLANTING
 CALCULATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR EACH BUILDING.
  
 6. SATISFIED. THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN FROM RES. NO.
 266-12 EXHIBIT D IS THE APPROVED PLAN OF RECORD, AND
 THIS IS AN AMENDMENT TO THAT PLAN. ALL AREAS THAT ARE
 NOT BEING ALTERED WITH THIS AMENDMENT NEED TO SHOW THE
 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED LANDSCAPING. THERE ARE NUMEROUS
 TREES AND PALMS MISSING FROM THE EXISTING SITE AND MUST
 BE REPLACED UNLESS THE AREA IS BEING ALTERED.
 MISSING TREES AND PALMS FROM THE APPROVED PLANS MUST BE
 SHOWN AS BEING REPLACED WITH THIS PLAN. ALL EXISTING
 TREES SHOWN MUST BE IDENTIFIED ON THIS PLAN. THERE ARE
 MULTIPLE APPROVED PALMS AND TREES MISSING, ESPECIALLY
 IN THE EASTERN BUFFER. SHEET L3 IS REFERENCED BUT WAS
 NOT SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. ALL EXISTING TREES MUST BE
 IDENTIFIED WITH TAGS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
  
 7. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF
 SUBSTITUTION OF PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES. SECTION
 94-442(D) REQUIRES A 3:1 RATIO FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR
 PALMS EXCEPT THE LISTED 1:1 SPECIES.
  
 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING
 LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS. PROVIDE
 THE TOTAL REQUIRED AND PROVIDED AS ONE TOTAL FOR BOTH
 SECTIONS. A SEPARATE EXHIBIT MAY BE PROVIDED TO
 DEMONSTRATE THE AREAS COUNTED.
 SECTION (4) HAS NOT BEEN CALCULATED AND INCLUDED IN
 TOTAL. PROVIDE A SEPARATE PLAN WITH THE PARKING SPACES,
 OTHER VEHICULAR USE AREAS AND THE PROVIDE INTERIOR
 LANDSCAPE AREAS SHOWN.
  
 9. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443 (C)(3)A. REQUIRES A
 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND AND REQUIRED TREE FOR EACH
 ROW OF PARKING. (3)B. REQUIRES AN INTERIOR LANDSCAPE
 ISLAND WITH A REQUIRED TREE SO THERE ARE NO MORE THAN
 10 SPACES IN A ROW. ALL THESE LANDSCAPE AREAS MUST MEET
 THE MINIMUM WIDTH OF 8 FEET OF LANDSCAPE AREA AND BE
 THE FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT SPACE. ALL
 RECONSTRUCTED AREAS OF PARKING MUST MEET THESE
 REQUIREMENTS, AND THE APPROVED PLAN FOLLOWED FOR
 UNALTERED AREAS.
 TREES HAVE BEEN DOUBLE COUNTED IN SOME ISLANDS,
 INCLUDING 2 ISLANDS SOUTH AND ONE NORTHEAST OF EXISTING
 BUILDING,
  
 TERMINAL ISLAND EAST OF DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DOES NOT
 CONTAIN A TREE.
  
 10. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A
 MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO
 BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING
 AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE
 PERCENTAGE OF CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR THE
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS AS REQUIRED BY SECTION
 94-443(C)(3) FOR DIVIDER ISLANDS, TERMINAL, AND
 INTERIOR ISLANDS.
  
 THE PERCENTAGE IS NOT 100%. THERE ARE FOUR SILVER
 BUTTONWOOD TREES USED AS REQUIRED TREES, AND THEY ARE
 CATEGORY 2. ALL EXISTING TREES MUST ALSO BE IDENTIFIED.
 THEN PROVIDE AN ACCURATE PERCENTAGE.
  
 11. SATISFIED. IN THE PARKING AREAS BEING
 RECONSTRUCTED, STAFF SUGGESTS REDUCING THE PAVED AREAS
 FOR PARKING SPACES AND USING CURBS INSTEAD OF WHEEL
 STOPS TO ALLOW FOR PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA AT THE
 OVERHANG. THIS ALSO ALLOWS MORE LANDSCAPE AREA FOR
 SUPPORTING THE ROOT ZONES OF THE TREES.
 12. SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN TO THE PLANT LIST FOR
 DROUGHT TOLERANT LEVELS OF EACH SPECIES AND WHETHER
 FLORIDA NATIVE.
  
 13. SATISFIED. REVISE THE SECTION IN THE LANDSCAPE DATA
 CHART TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A
 MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE
 FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED
 FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST
 RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT
 DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
 PROVIDE THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT
 TOLERANT PLANTS BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST.
  
 14. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH
 LANDSCAPING.
 THERE APPEARS TO BE A DIRECT CONFLICT WITH A TREE AT
 THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EXISTING BUILDING WITH A
 TRANSFORMER. ADDRESS THIS ISSUE. THE TRANSFORMER AT THE
 NORTHWEST CORNER DOES NOT HAVE SCREENING, AND THE
 REQUIRE TREE IS DISPLACED.
  
 15. SATISFIED. THERE ARE MULTIPLE CONFLICTS BETWEEN
 REQUIRED TREES AND THE PROPOSED WATER LINES, HYDRANTS
 AND BACKFLOW PREVENTERS ON THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
 PLANS. THESE WILL CONFLICT WITH REQUIRED TREES IN THE
 LANDSCAPE AREAS. ALL CHANGES PROPOSED TO PALM BEACH
 COUNTY WATER UTILITY LOCATIONS MUST BE FIRST REVIEWED
 AND APPROVED BY THE CITY TO VERIFY THERE WILL NOT BE
 CHANGES TO THE LANDSCAPE OR SITE PLAN THAT WILL CREATE
 NONCONFORMITIES.
 HYDRANT PROPOSED AT SOUTH END OF EXISTING BUILDING IS
 PLACED SO AS TO LIMIT THE LOCATION OF REQUIRED TREES.
  
 16. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 VALVES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 17. SATISFIED. INDICATE HOW LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE
 DISTRICT WILL ACCESS AREAS OF THE CANAL FOR
 MAINTENANCE. IF THE PREVIOUS GAPS IN THE SOUTH BUFFER
 ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR ACCESS, THE REQUIRED
 PLANTINGS ARE TO BE RESTORED. PROVIDE DISTRICT APPROVAL
 OF ALL LANDSCAPING PROPOSED WITHIN THEIR EASEMENT.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/20/20:
  
 18. SATISFIED. ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY, A
 FENCE IS INDICATED RUNNING THROUGH AN EXISTING TREE.
 ADJUST TO AVOID CONFLICT.
  
 19. SATISFIED. THE LANDSCAPE DIVIDER ISLAND WEST OF THE
 DUMPSTER IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A TREE EVERY 30 FEET PER
 SECTION 94-443(C)(3)C.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 2/4/20:
  
 20. SATISFIED. EAST SIDE OF EXISTING BUILDING:
 LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN, SITE
 PLAN AND CIVIL PLANS SHOW SIDEWALK WHERE TREES ARE
 LOCATED. SIDEWALK LOCATION SHOULD BE AGAINST BUILDING.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 3/25/20 BASED ON THE REVISED SITE
 AND LANDSCAPE PLAN:
  
 21. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET LP-1 APPROVED WITH RESO.
 266-12 IS THE PLAN BEING AMENDED, SO ALL MISSING
 LANDSCAPING NEEDS TO BE SHOWN PER THAT PLAN AND
 PROPOSED CHANGES ARE TO BE INDICATED BY CLOUDING. THAT
 MAJOR AMENDMENT APPROVED ADDING THE PARALLEL PARKING
 SPACES ALONG THE ACCESS ROAD, SO THERE ARE MISSING
 TREES AND PALMS, INCLUDING THE REQUIRED TREES AT THE
 ENDS OF THE ROWS OF PARKING.
 22. THE NEW TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND SOUTHWEST OF THE
 EXISTING BUILDING DOES NOT MEET THE 8 FOOT WIDTH
 REQUIREMENT AND IS MISSING THE REQUIRED TREE.
  
 23. MAKE ALL ADJUSTMENTS TO TABLES AND CHARTS.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 01-22-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 01-22-2021 Time 14:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 01-22-2021 Time 14:50 Sent To  
Notes
2021-01-22 14:51:06FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: HULETT CPD Z20070009
 JANUARY 22, 2021
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO TREE
 DISPOSITION CHART SHEET L2:
 ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CANOPY DIAMETERS FOR ALL
 TREES.
 ? SATISFIED. IF CANOPY DIAMETERS ARE 20 FEET OR MORE,
 CALCULATE THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE AND ENTER INTO THE
 MITIGATION DUE COLUMN IF PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL. IF UNDER
 20 FEET, THE SQUARE FOOTAGE IS BASED ON THE CATEGORY
 FOR THE TREE. ADD A COLUMN FOR THE CANOPY SQUARE
 FOOTAGE FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS.
  
 ? SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN AND LIST THE CATEGORY FOR
 EACH TREE AND PALM FROM THE CITY REFERENCE LIST.
 SABAL PALMS ARE CATEGORY 3, CORRECT ON LIST. #53 IS 100
 SQ FT MITIGATION DUE FOR CATEGORY 3 REMOVAL.
  
 ? SATISFIED. REMOVE EXISTING ?UNIDENTIFIED TREE TO BE
 REMOVED? FROM THE TREE ACTION LEGEND LIST, AS ALL TREES
 MUST BE PROPERLY IDENTIFIED.
 ? SATISFIED. REMOVE NOTE REFERENCING DBH.
 ? SATISFIED. ASSIGN NUMBERS AND INCLUDE TREE AND 5
 PALMS SHOWN IN RED ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE.
 ? SATISFIED. CHANGE TREE CREDITS COLUMN TO MITIGATION
 DUE, AND LIST SQUARE FOOTAGE IF MITIGATION IS DUE.
 ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF
 MITIGATION DUE AND SHOW MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE
 PROVIDED FROM THE PROPOSED TREE LIST AFTER ALL
 CORRECTIONS.
 ADJUST TOTAL FOR ALL MITIGATION DUE TO INCLUDE PALMS
 AND CORRECTED PALM TOTAL.
 SHOULD BE 11,548 SQ FT.
  
 ? SATISFIED. INCLUDE A LIST OF ALL SPECIES AND
 QUANTITIES COUNTED TOWARD MITIGATION BASED ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN, NOT INCLUDING REPLACEMENTS FOR MISSING
 APPROVED TREES AND PALMS.
 MITIGATION IS SHORT 148 SQ FT.
  
 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
 EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
 POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE CONDITION FOR ALL EXISTING
 TREES AND PALMS AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE
 TREES AND PALMS BASED ON A CERTIFIED ARBORISTS REPORT.
  
 3. SATISFIED. EXPLAIN THE DIFFERENCE IN PERVIOUS AREA
 AND LANDSCAPE AREA SQUARE FOOTAGE.
 ANSWER TO COMMENT ADDRESSES PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS
 AREAS. THE QUESTION WAS REFERENCING THE DISCREPANCY
 SHOWN BETWEEN THE PERVIOUS AREA SQUARE FOOTAGE AND THE
 LANDSCAPE AREA SQUARE FOOTAGE LISTED ON THE LANDSCAPE
 CODE DATA CHART. THIS HAS BEEN CORRECTED TO SHOW THEY
 ARE NOW THE SAME SQUARE FOOTAGE.
  
 4. SATISFIED. REMOVE ?S. DIXIE HWY.? FROM WEST PROPERTY
 LINE BUFFER REFERENCE.
  
 5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE FOUNDATION PLANTING
 CALCULATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR EACH BUILDING.
  
 6. SATISFIED. THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN FROM RES. NO.
 266-12 EXHIBIT D IS THE APPROVED PLAN OF RECORD, AND
 THIS IS AN AMENDMENT TO THAT PLAN. ALL AREAS THAT ARE
 NOT BEING ALTERED WITH THIS AMENDMENT NEED TO SHOW THE
 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED LANDSCAPING. THERE ARE NUMEROUS
 TREES AND PALMS MISSING FROM THE EXISTING SITE AND MUST
 BE REPLACED UNLESS THE AREA IS BEING ALTERED.
 MISSING TREES AND PALMS FROM THE APPROVED PLANS MUST BE
 SHOWN AS BEING REPLACED WITH THIS PLAN. ALL EXISTING
 TREES SHOWN MUST BE IDENTIFIED ON THIS PLAN. THERE ARE
 MULTIPLE APPROVED PALMS AND TREES MISSING, ESPECIALLY
 IN THE EASTERN BUFFER. SHEET L3 IS REFERENCED BUT WAS
 NOT SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. ALL EXISTING TREES MUST BE
 IDENTIFIED WITH TAGS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
  
 7. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF
 SUBSTITUTION OF PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES. SECTION
 94-442(D) REQUIRES A 3:1 RATIO FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR
 PALMS EXCEPT THE LISTED 1:1 SPECIES.
  
 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING
 LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS. PROVIDE
 THE TOTAL REQUIRED AND PROVIDED AS ONE TOTAL FOR BOTH
 SECTIONS. A SEPARATE EXHIBIT MAY BE PROVIDED TO
 DEMONSTRATE THE AREAS COUNTED.
 SECTION (4) HAS NOT BEEN CALCULATED AND INCLUDED IN
 TOTAL. PROVIDE A SEPARATE PLAN WITH THE PARKING SPACES,
 OTHER VEHICULAR USE AREAS AND THE PROVIDE INTERIOR
 LANDSCAPE AREAS SHOWN.
  
 9. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443 (C)(3)A.
 REQUIRES A TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND AND REQUIRED TREE
 FOR EACH ROW OF PARKING. (3)B. REQUIRES AN INTERIOR
 LANDSCAPE ISLAND WITH A REQUIRED TREE SO THERE ARE NO
 MORE THAN 10 SPACES IN A ROW. ALL THESE LANDSCAPE AREAS
 MUST MEET THE MINIMUM WIDTH OF 8 FEET OF LANDSCAPE AREA
 AND BE THE FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT SPACE. ALL
 RECONSTRUCTED AREAS OF PARKING MUST MEET THESE
 REQUIREMENTS, AND THE APPROVED PLAN FOLLOWED FOR
 UNALTERED AREAS.
 TREES HAVE BEEN DOUBLE COUNTED IN SOME ISLANDS,
 INCLUDING 2 ISLANDS SOUTH AND ONE NORTHEAST OF EXISTING
 BUILDING,
  
 TERMINAL ISLAND EAST OF DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DOES NOT
 CONTAIN A TREE.
  
 10. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A
 MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO
 BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING
 AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE
 PERCENTAGE OF CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR THE
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS AS REQUIRED BY SECTION
 94-443(C)(3) FOR DIVIDER ISLANDS, TERMINAL, AND
 INTERIOR ISLANDS.
  
 THE PERCENTAGE IS NOT 100%. THERE ARE FOUR SILVER
 BUTTONWOOD TREES USED AS REQUIRED TREES, AND THEY ARE
 CATEGORY 2. ALL EXISTING TREES MUST ALSO BE IDENTIFIED.
 THEN PROVIDE AN ACCURATE PERCENTAGE.
  
 11. SATISFIED. IN THE PARKING AREAS BEING
 RECONSTRUCTED, STAFF SUGGESTS REDUCING THE PAVED AREAS
 FOR PARKING SPACES AND USING CURBS INSTEAD OF WHEEL
 STOPS TO ALLOW FOR PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA AT THE
 OVERHANG. THIS ALSO ALLOWS MORE LANDSCAPE AREA FOR
 SUPPORTING THE ROOT ZONES OF THE TREES.
 12. SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN TO THE PLANT LIST FOR
 DROUGHT TOLERANT LEVELS OF EACH SPECIES AND WHETHER
 FLORIDA NATIVE.
  
 13. SATISFIED. REVISE THE SECTION IN THE LANDSCAPE DATA
 CHART TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A
 MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE
 FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED
 FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST
 RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT
 DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
 PROVIDE THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT
 TOLERANT PLANTS BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST.
  
 14. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH
 LANDSCAPING.
 THERE APPEARS TO BE A DIRECT CONFLICT WITH A TREE AT
 THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EXISTING BUILDING WITH A
 TRANSFORMER. ADDRESS THIS ISSUE. THE TRANSFORMER AT THE
 NORTHWEST CORNER DOES NOT HAVE SCREENING, AND THE
 REQUIRE TREE IS DISPLACED.
  
 15. SATISFIED. THERE ARE MULTIPLE CONFLICTS BETWEEN
 REQUIRED TREES AND THE PROPOSED WATER LINES, HYDRANTS
 AND BACKFLOW PREVENTERS ON THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
 PLANS. THESE WILL CONFLICT WITH REQUIRED TREES IN THE
 LANDSCAPE AREAS. ALL CHANGES PROPOSED TO PALM BEACH
 COUNTY WATER UTILITY LOCATIONS MUST BE FIRST REVIEWED
 AND APPROVED BY THE CITY TO VERIFY THERE WILL NOT BE
 CHANGES TO THE LANDSCAPE OR SITE PLAN THAT WILL CREATE
 NONCONFORMITIES.
 HYDRANT PROPOSED AT SOUTH END OF EXISTING BUILDING IS
 PLACED SO AS TO LIMIT THE LOCATION OF REQUIRED TREES.
  
 16. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 VALVES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 17. SATISFIED. INDICATE HOW LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE
 DISTRICT WILL ACCESS AREAS OF THE CANAL FOR
 MAINTENANCE. IF THE PREVIOUS GAPS IN THE SOUTH BUFFER
 ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR ACCESS, THE REQUIRED
 PLANTINGS ARE TO BE RESTORED. PROVIDE DISTRICT APPROVAL
 OF ALL LANDSCAPING PROPOSED WITHIN THEIR EASEMENT.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/20/20:
  
 18. SATISFIED. ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY, A
 FENCE IS INDICATED RUNNING THROUGH AN EXISTING TREE.
 ADJUST TO AVOID CONFLICT.
  
 19. SATISFIED. THE LANDSCAPE DIVIDER ISLAND WEST OF THE
 DUMPSTER IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A TREE EVERY 30 FEET PER
 SECTION 94-443(C)(3)C.
  
  
  
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 2/4/20:
  
 20. EAST SIDE OF EXISTING BUILDING: LANDSCAPE PLAN
 SHOWS EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN, SITE PLAN AND CIVIL
 PLANS SHOW SIDEWALK WHERE TREES ARE LOCATED. SIDEWALK
 LOCATION SHOULD BE AGAINST BUILDING.
  
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-20-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 10-20-2020 Time 17:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 10-20-2020 Time 17:33 Sent To  
Notes
2020-10-20 17:34:00FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: HULETT CPD Z20070009
 OCTOBER 20, 2020
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO TREE
 DISPOSITION CHART SHEET L2:
 ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CANOPY DIAMETERS FOR ALL
 TREES.
 ? SATISFIED. IF CANOPY DIAMETERS ARE 20 FEET OR MORE,
 CALCULATE THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE AND ENTER INTO THE
 MITIGATION DUE COLUMN IF PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL. IF UNDER
 20 FEET, THE SQUARE FOOTAGE IS BASED ON THE CATEGORY
 FOR THE TREE. ADD A COLUMN FOR THE CANOPY SQUARE
 FOOTAGE FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS.
  
 ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN AND LIST THE
 CATEGORY FOR EACH TREE AND PALM FROM THE CITY REFERENCE
 LIST.
 SABAL PALMS ARE CATEGORY 3, CORRECT ON LIST. #53 IS 100
 SQ FT MITIGATION DUE FOR CATEGORY 3 REMOVAL.
  
 ? SATISFIED. REMOVE EXISTING ?UNIDENTIFIED TREE TO BE
 REMOVED? FROM THE TREE ACTION LEGEND LIST, AS ALL TREES
 MUST BE PROPERLY IDENTIFIED.
 ? SATISFIED. REMOVE NOTE REFERENCING DBH.
 ? SATISFIED. ASSIGN NUMBERS AND INCLUDE TREE AND 5
 PALMS SHOWN IN RED ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE.
 ? SATISFIED. CHANGE TREE CREDITS COLUMN TO MITIGATION
 DUE, AND LIST SQUARE FOOTAGE IF MITIGATION IS DUE.
 ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE
 OF MITIGATION DUE AND SHOW MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE
 PROVIDED FROM THE PROPOSED TREE LIST AFTER ALL
 CORRECTIONS.
 ADJUST TOTAL FOR ALL MITIGATION DUE TO INCLUDE PALMS
 AND CORRECTED PALM TOTAL.
 SHOULD BE 11,548 SQ FT.
  
 ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. INCLUDE A LIST OF ALL SPECIES
 AND QUANTITIES COUNTED TOWARD MITIGATION BASED ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN, NOT INCLUDING REPLACEMENTS FOR MISSING
 APPROVED TREES AND PALMS.
 MITIGATION IS SHORT 148 SQ FT.
  
 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
 EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
 POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE CONDITION FOR ALL EXISTING
 TREES AND PALMS AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE
 TREES AND PALMS BASED ON A CERTIFIED ARBORISTS REPORT.
  
 3. SATISFIED. EXPLAIN THE DIFFERENCE IN PERVIOUS AREA
 AND LANDSCAPE AREA SQUARE FOOTAGE.
 ANSWER TO COMMENT ADDRESSES PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS
 AREAS. THE QUESTION WAS REFERENCING THE DISCREPANCY
 SHOWN BETWEEN THE PERVIOUS AREA SQUARE FOOTAGE AND THE
 LANDSCAPE AREA SQUARE FOOTAGE LISTED ON THE LANDSCAPE
 CODE DATA CHART. THIS HAS BEEN CORRECTED TO SHOW THEY
 ARE NOW THE SAME SQUARE FOOTAGE.
  
 4. SATISFIED. REMOVE ?S. DIXIE HWY.? FROM WEST PROPERTY
 LINE BUFFER REFERENCE.
  
 5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE FOUNDATION PLANTING
 CALCULATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR EACH BUILDING.
  
 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN
 FROM RES. NO. 266-12 EXHIBIT D IS THE APPROVED PLAN OF
 RECORD, AND THIS IS AN AMENDMENT TO THAT PLAN. ALL
 AREAS THAT ARE NOT BEING ALTERED WITH THIS AMENDMENT
 NEED TO SHOW THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED LANDSCAPING. THERE
 ARE NUMEROUS TREES AND PALMS MISSING FROM THE EXISTING
 SITE AND MUST BE REPLACED UNLESS THE AREA IS BEING
 ALTERED.
 MISSING TREES AND PALMS FROM THE APPROVED PLANS MUST BE
 SHOWN AS BEING REPLACED WITH THIS PLAN. ALL EXISTING
 TREES SHOWN MUST BE IDENTIFIED ON THIS PLAN. THERE ARE
 MULTIPLE APPROVED PALMS AND TREES MISSING, ESPECIALLY
 IN THE EASTERN BUFFER. SHEET L3 IS REFERENCED BUT WAS
 NOT SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. ALL EXISTING TREES MUST BE
 IDENTIFIED WITH TAGS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
  
 7. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF
 SUBSTITUTION OF PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES. SECTION
 94-442(D) REQUIRES A 3:1 RATIO FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR
 PALMS EXCEPT THE LISTED 1:1 SPECIES.
  
 8. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE
 PARKING LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH
 SECTION 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS.
 PROVIDE THE TOTAL REQUIRED AND PROVIDED AS ONE TOTAL
 FOR BOTH SECTIONS. A SEPARATE EXHIBIT MAY BE PROVIDED
 TO DEMONSTRATE THE AREAS COUNTED.
 SECTION (4) HAS NOT BEEN CALCULATED AND INCLUDED IN
 TOTAL. PROVIDE A SEPARATE PLAN WITH THE PARKING SPACES,
 OTHER VEHICULAR USE AREAS AND THE PROVIDE INTERIOR
 LANDSCAPE AREAS SHOWN.
  
 9. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443 (C)(3)A.
 REQUIRES A TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND AND REQUIRED TREE
 FOR EACH ROW OF PARKING. (3)B. REQUIRES AN INTERIOR
 LANDSCAPE ISLAND WITH A REQUIRED TREE SO THERE ARE NO
 MORE THAN 10 SPACES IN A ROW. ALL THESE LANDSCAPE AREAS
 MUST MEET THE MINIMUM WIDTH OF 8 FEET OF LANDSCAPE AREA
 AND BE THE FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT SPACE. ALL
 RECONSTRUCTED AREAS OF PARKING MUST MEET THESE
 REQUIREMENTS, AND THE APPROVED PLAN FOLLOWED FOR
 UNALTERED AREAS.
 TREES HAVE BEEN DOUBLE COUNTED IN SOME ISLANDS,
 INCLUDING 2 ISLANDS SOUTH AND ONE NORTHEAST OF EXISTING
 BUILDING,
  
 10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES
 THAT A MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE
 REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF
 STREET PARKING AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES.
 SHOW THE PERCENTAGE OF CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR
 THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS AS REQUIRED BY SECTION
 94-443(C)(3) FOR DIVIDER ISLANDS, TERMINAL, AND
 INTERIOR ISLANDS.
  
 THE PERCENTAGE IS NOT 100%. THERE ARE FOUR SILVER
 BUTTONWOOD TREES USED AS REQUIRED TREES, AND THEY ARE
 CATEGORY 2. ALL EXISTING TREES MUST ALSO BE IDENTIFIED.
 THEN PROVIDE AN ACCURATE PERCENTAGE.
  
 11. SATISFIED. IN THE PARKING AREAS BEING
 RECONSTRUCTED, STAFF SUGGESTS REDUCING THE PAVED AREAS
 FOR PARKING SPACES AND USING CURBS INSTEAD OF WHEEL
 STOPS TO ALLOW FOR PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA AT THE
 OVERHANG. THIS ALSO ALLOWS MORE LANDSCAPE AREA FOR
 SUPPORTING THE ROOT ZONES OF THE TREES.
 12. SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN TO THE PLANT LIST FOR
 DROUGHT TOLERANT LEVELS OF EACH SPECIES AND WHETHER
 FLORIDA NATIVE.
  
 13. SATISFIED. REVISE THE SECTION IN THE LANDSCAPE DATA
 CHART TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A
 MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE
 FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED
 FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST
 RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT
 DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
 PROVIDE THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT
 TOLERANT PLANTS BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST.
  
 14. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL
 TRANSFORMERS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE
 CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
 THERE APPEARS TO BE A DIRECT CONFLICT WITH A TREE AT
 THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EXISTING BUILDING WITH A
 TRANSFORMER. ADDRESS THIS ISSUE. THE TRANSFORMER AT THE
 NORTHWEST CORNER DOES NOT HAVE SCREENING, AND THE
 REQUIRE TREE IS DISPLACED.
  
 15. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THERE ARE MULTIPLE CONFLICTS
 BETWEEN REQUIRED TREES AND THE PROPOSED WATER LINES,
 HYDRANTS AND BACKFLOW PREVENTERS ON THE PRELIMINARY
 ENGINEERING PLANS. THESE WILL CONFLICT WITH REQUIRED
 TREES IN THE LANDSCAPE AREAS. ALL CHANGES PROPOSED TO
 PALM BEACH COUNTY WATER UTILITY LOCATIONS MUST BE FIRST
 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY TO VERIFY THERE WILL
 NOT BE CHANGES TO THE LANDSCAPE OR SITE PLAN THAT WILL
 CREATE NONCONFORMITIES.
 HYDRANT PROPOSED AT SOUTH END OF EXISTING BUILDING IS
 PLACED SO AS TO LIMIT THE LOCATION OF REQUIRED TREES.
  
 16. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 VALVES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 17. SATISFIED. INDICATE HOW LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE
 DISTRICT WILL ACCESS AREAS OF THE CANAL FOR
 MAINTENANCE. IF THE PREVIOUS GAPS IN THE SOUTH BUFFER
 ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR ACCESS, THE REQUIRED
 PLANTINGS ARE TO BE RESTORED. PROVIDE DISTRICT APPROVAL
 OF ALL LANDSCAPING PROPOSED WITHIN THEIR EASEMENT.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/20/20:
  
 18. ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY, A FENCE IS
 INDICATED RUNNING THROUGH AN EXISTING TREE. ADJUST TO
 AVOID CONFLICT.
  
 19. THE LANDSCAPE DIVIDER ISLAND WEST OF THE DUMPSTER
 IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A TREE EVERY 30 FEET PER SECTION
 94-443(C)(3)C.
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-12-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 08-12-2020 Time 15:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 08-12-2020 Time 15:38 Sent To  
Notes
2020-08-12 15:38:38FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: HULETT CPD Z20070009
 AUGUST 12, 2020
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO TREE
 DISPOSITION CHART SHEET L2:
 ? PROVIDE THE CANOPY DIAMETERS FOR ALL TREES.
 ? IF CANOPY DIAMETERS ARE 20 FEET OR MORE, CALCULATE
 THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE AND ENTER INTO THE MITIGATION
 DUE COLUMN IF PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL. IF UNDER 20 FEET,
 THE SQUARE FOOTAGE IS BASED ON THE CATEGORY FOR THE
 TREE. ADD A COLUMN FOR THE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR
 ALL TREES AND PALMS.
 ? ADD A COLUMN AND LIST THE CATEGORY FOR EACH TREE AND
 PALM FROM THE CITY REFERENCE LIST.
 ? REMOVE EXISTING ?UNIDENTIFIED TREE TO BE REMOVED?
 FROM THE TREE ACTION LEGEND LIST, AS ALL TREES MUST BE
 PROPERLY IDENTIFIED.
 ? REMOVE NOTE REFERENCING DBH.
 ? ASSIGN NUMBERS AND INCLUDE TREE AND 5 PALMS SHOWN IN
 RED ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE.
 ? CHANGE TREE CREDITS COLUMN TO MITIGATION DUE, AND
 LIST SQUARE FOOTAGE IF MITIGATION IS DUE.
 ? PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF MITIGATION DUE
 AND SHOW MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED FROM THE
 PROPOSED TREE LIST AFTER ALL CORRECTIONS.
 ? INCLUDE A LIST OF ALL SPECIES AND QUANTITIES COUNTED
 TOWARD MITIGATION BASED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, NOT
 INCLUDING REPLACEMENTS FOR MISSING APPROVED TREES AND
 PALMS.
  
 2. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES IN GOOD
 CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A
 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY
 RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION.
 PROVIDE CONDITION FOR ALL EXISTING TREES AND PALMS AND
 RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS
 BASED ON A CERTIFIED ARBORISTS REPORT.
  
 3. EXPLAIN THE DIFFERENCE IN PERVIOUS AREA AND
 LANDSCAPE AREA SQUARE FOOTAGE.
  
 4. REMOVE ?S. DIXIE HWY.? FROM WEST PROPERTY LINE
 BUFFER REFERENCE.
  
 5. PROVIDE THE FOUNDATION PLANTING CALCULATION REQUIRED
 AND PROVIDED FOR EACH BUILDING.
  
 6. THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN FROM RES. NO. 266-12
 EXHIBIT D IS THE APPROVED PLAN OF RECORD, AND THIS IS
 AN AMENDMENT TO THAT PLAN. ALL AREAS THAT ARE NOT BEING
 ALTERED WITH THIS AMENDMENT NEED TO SHOW THE PREVIOUSLY
 APPROVED LANDSCAPING. THERE ARE NUMEROUS TREES AND
 PALMS MISSING FROM THE EXISTING SITE AND MUST BE
 REPLACED UNLESS THE AREA IS BEING ALTERED.
  
  
 7. PROVIDE THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF SUBSTITUTION OF
 PALMS FOR REQUIRED TREES. SECTION 94-442(D) REQUIRES A
 3:1 RATIO FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR PALMS EXCEPT THE LISTED
 1:1 SPECIES.
  
 8. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING LANDSCAPE AREAS
 COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-443(C)(3) AND
 (4) AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS. PROVIDE THE TOTAL
 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED AS ONE TOTAL FOR BOTH SECTIONS. A
 SEPARATE EXHIBIT MAY BE PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE THE
 AREAS COUNTED.
  
 9. SECTION 94-443 (C)(3)A. REQUIRES A TERMINAL
 LANDSCAPE ISLAND AND REQUIRED TREE FOR EACH ROW OF
 PARKING. (3)B. REQUIRES AN INTERIOR LANDSCAPE ISLAND
 WITH A REQUIRED TREE SO THERE ARE NO MORE THAN 10
 SPACES IN A ROW. ALL THESE LANDSCAPE AREAS MUST MEET
 THE MINIMUM WIDTH OF 8 FEET OF LANDSCAPE AREA AND BE
 THE FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT SPACE. ALL
 RECONSTRUCTED AREAS OF PARKING MUST MEET THESE
 REQUIREMENTS, AND THE APPROVED PLAN FOLLOWED FOR
 UNALTERED AREAS.
  
 10. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A MINIMUM OF 75
 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED
 WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING AREA SHALL
 BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE OF
 CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE
 AREAS AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 94-443(C)(3) FOR DIVIDER
 ISLANDS, TERMINAL, AND INTERIOR ISLANDS.
  
 11. IN THE PARKING AREAS BEING RECONSTRUCTED, STAFF
 SUGGESTS REDUCING THE PAVED AREAS FOR PARKING SPACES
 AND USING CURBS INSTEAD OF WHEEL STOPS TO ALLOW FOR
 PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA AT THE OVERHANG. THIS ALSO
 ALLOWS MORE LANDSCAPE AREA FOR SUPPORTING THE ROOT
 ZONES OF THE TREES.
 12. ADD A COLUMN TO THE PLANT LIST FOR DROUGHT TOLERANT
 LEVELS OF EACH SPECIES AND WHETHER FLORIDA NATIVE.
  
 13. REVISE THE SECTION IN THE LANDSCAPE DATA CHART TO
 COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM
 OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA
 NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE
 CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT
 EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
 WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
 PROVIDE THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT
 TOLERANT PLANTS BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST.
  
 14. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
  
 15. THERE ARE MULTIPLE CONFLICTS BETWEEN REQUIRED TREES
 AND THE PROPOSED WATER LINES, HYDRANTS AND BACKFLOW
 PREVENTERS ON THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PLANS. THESE
 WILL CONFLICT WITH REQUIRED TREES IN THE LANDSCAPE
 AREAS. ALL CHANGES PROPOSED TO PALM BEACH COUNTY WATER
 UTILITY LOCATIONS MUST BE FIRST REVIEWED AND APPROVED
 BY THE CITY TO VERIFY THERE WILL NOT BE CHANGES TO THE
 LANDSCAPE OR SITE PLAN THAT WILL CREATE
 NONCONFORMITIES.
  
 16. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED VALVES AND
 EQUIPMENT.
  
 17. INDICATE HOW LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT WILL
 ACCESS AREAS OF THE CANAL FOR MAINTENANCE. IF THE
 PREVIOUS GAPS IN THE SOUTH BUFFER ARE NO LONGER
 REQUIRED FOR ACCESS, THE REQUIRED PLANTINGS ARE TO BE
 RESTORED. PROVIDE DISTRICT APPROVAL OF ALL LANDSCAPING
 PROPOSED WITHIN THEIR EASEMENT.
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 3 Status P Date 02-05-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 02-05-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 02-05-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-02-05 09:18:00NO FURTHER COMMENTS FROM DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 [email protected]
 561822-2045
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-07-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 10-07-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 10-07-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-10-07 10:59:26PLEASE PROVIDE THE REVISED AUTO TURN TO REFLECT THE
 MODIFIED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE ORENTATION DISCUSSED WITH
 ADAM S. TO ALLOW THE DUMPSTERS ENTRY POINTS TO:
 OPTION1: FRON EAST DIRECTION
 OPTION 2: FROM SOUTH EEAST DIRECTION
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-12-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 08-12-2020 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 08-12-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-08-12 17:04:39PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:
 1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID
 WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE AND TYPE OF
 THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR) THAT WILL BE
 UTILIZED THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION
 SERVICE.
 2- REVISED SITE PLAN, SHEET S-1, TO REFLECT THE
 DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL THAT COMPLIES WITH THE LATEST
 REVISION OF CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL
 CONSTRUCTION GARBAGE ENCLOSURE STANDARD, GC-7.
 3- AUTO TURN FOR THE, FRONT LOADE SANITATION COLLECTION
 TRUCK WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECS:
 - TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT
 - TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT
 - TURNING RADIUS:
 - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT
 - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT
 - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 3 Status P Date 02-04-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 02-04-2021 Time 15:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 02-04-2021 Time 16:07 Sent To  
Notes
2021-02-04 16:07:23THE COMMENT BELOW IS FROM THE REVIEW OF THE 1/5/2021
 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE.
  
 1. BOTH THE CIVIL PLANS AND THE SITE PLAN SHOW TO THE
 EAST OF THE EXISTING BUILDING A FOUNDATION PLANTING
 AREA AND SIDEWALK/CURB. THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN AND
 LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOW EXISTING LIVE OAK TREES AND
 MAHOGANY TREES TO REMAIN WHERE THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK IS
 SHOWN.
  
 TRACY WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 [email protected]
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-21-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 10-21-2020 Time 19:16 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 10-21-2020 Time 19:16 Sent To  
Notes
2020-10-21 19:14:31THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 10/5/2020 SUBMITTAL:
  
 1. [NOT SATISFIED] THE CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN DOES NOT
 MATCH THE LANDSCAPE PLAN OR ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN.
  
 2. [SATISFIED] SHOW THE PROPOSED UTILITIES ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 3. [SATISFIED] CONSIDER ROOT BARRIER BETWEEN TREES AND
 UTILITIES.
  
 4. [NOT SATISFIED] IF PARKING STALLS ARE REDUCED IN
 LENGTH BY TWO FEET, SHOW THE 2' OVERHANG IN THE
 LANDSCAPE AREA ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS. IF THE PARKING
 STALLS ARE NOT REDUCED BY TWO FEET, THEN CONSIDER
 REDUCING THEM AND PROVIDING ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE AREA.
  
 5. [SATISFIED] THE NORTH PARKING STALLS IN THE SOUTH
 PARKING LOT DO NOT HAVE WHEEL STOPS. CURBING USED AT
 END OF THE PARKING STALLS.
  
 6. [TO BE CONFIRMED DURING ENGINEERING PERMIT REVIEW]
 IT APPEARS THERE ARE TWO SEPARATE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS
 (OUTFALLS) ONE FOR THE SOUTH ROADWAY/ACCESS EASEMENT
 AND ONE FOR THE PARKING LOTS/BUILDINGS. MAINTAIN
 EXISTING DRAINAGE AREAS OR DEMONSTRATE BOTH SYSTEMS
 PROVIDES THE REQUIRED STORMWATER QUALITY TREATMENT
 VOLUMES FOR ITS TRIBUTARY DRAINAGE AREA WITH THE
 ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. SUBMIT DRAINAGE
 CALCULATIONS WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 7. [SATISFIED] SHOW ON AN AERIAL MAP WHERE THE TWO
 OUTFALL PIPES DISCHARGE INTO THE MASTER DRAINAGE
 SYSTEM.
  
 8. [TO BE CONFIRMED WITH SFWMD ERP MODIFICATION]
 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET
 SFWMD ERP CRITERIA INCLUDING WATER QUALITY TREATMENT,
 PEAK FLOW ATTENUATION, C-51 BASIN FILL ENCROACHMENT,
 PERIMETER GRADING, ETC. SUBMIT A DRAINAGE REPORT WITH
 THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 9. [SATISFIED] LIST THE VERTICAL DATUM ON EVERY SHEET
 WITH ELEVATION INFORMATION. IF THE VERTICAL DATUM USED
 IN NOT NGVD1929 THEN PROVIDE THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO
 CALCULATE THE ELEVATIONS IN NGVD1929.
  
 10. [SATISFIED] THERE APPEARS TO BE A BERM ALONG THE
 SOUTH PROPERTY LINE. WHERE DOES THE RUNOFF FROM THE
 PARKING STALLS AT THE WEST END OF THE SOUTH PARKING
 AREA DRAIN TO? FLOW ARROWS INDICATE TOWARD THE BERM.
  
 11. [SATISFIED] WHAT MEASURES ARE BEING IMPLEMENTED TO
 PREVENT RUNOFF FROM THE SERVICE BAY/WAREHOUSE FROM
 FLOWING INTO THE DRAIANGE SYSTEM?
  
 12. [SATISFIED] CONNECT ROOF DRAINS TO THE DRAINAGE
 SYSTEM OR DIRECT THE DISCHARGE TO PERVIOUS AREAS.
  
 NEW COMMENTS:
  
 13. CORRECT THE YEAR TYPO IN THE SURVEYOR'S NOTE #14 ON
 THE SURVEY - "14. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON
 THE NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (N.G.V.D.
 1929) ..."
  
 14. SECTION A-A SHOWS A CURB ON THE RIGHT SIDE (EAST)
 SIDE OF THE DRIVE AISLE. THIS CURB DOES NOT APPEAR ON
 THE PLAN VIEW.
  
 15. CORRECT THE HATCHING AND SPOT GRADE PLACEMENT OF
 THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND BETWEEN THE BUILDINGS.
  
 16. PROVIDE A PRB DETAIL.
  
 17. BOTH THE PRB AND WEIR DETAILS SHOULD SHOW GASKET
 SEAL.
  
 18. SUGGEST SPECIFYING MINIMUM LBR FOR THE SUBGRADE FOR
 PAVEMENT SECTIONS.
  
 19. THE MODIFIED EXFILTRATION TRENCH EQUATION TO BE
 USED TO CALCULATE TRENCH STORAGE SINCE THE TRENCH WIDTH
 IS MORE THAN TWICE THE TRENCH DEPTH.
  
 TRACY WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 [email protected]
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-13-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 08-13-2020 Time 09:29 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 08-13-2020 Time 09:32 Sent To  
Notes
2020-08-13 09:30:06THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE CIVIL PLAN.
  
 2. SHOW THE PROPOSED UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 3. CONSIDER ROOT BARRIER BETWEEN TREES AND UTILITIES.
  
 4. IF PARKING STALLS ARE REDUCED IN LENGTH BY TWO FEET,
 SHOW THE 2' OVERHANG IN THE LANDSCAPE AREA ON THE
 ENGINEERING PLANS. IF THE PARKING STALLS ARE NOT
 REDUCED BY TWO FEET, THEN CONSIDER REDUCING THEM AND
 PROVIDING ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE AREA.
  
 5. THE NORTH PARKING STALLS IN THE SOUTH PARKING LOT DO
 NOT HAVE WHEEL STOPS.
  
 6. IT APPEARS THERE ARE TWO SEPARATE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS
 (OUTFALLS) ? ONE FOR THE SOUTH ROADWAY/ACCESS EASEMENT
 AND ONE FOR THE PARKING LOTS/BUILDINGS. MAINTAIN
 EXISTING DRAINAGE AREAS OR DEMONSTRATE BOTH SYSTEMS
 PROVIDES THE REQUIRED STORMWATER QUALITY TREATMENT
 VOLUMES FOR ITS TRIBUTARY DRAINAGE AREA WITH THE
 ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 7. SHOW ON AN AERIAL MAP WHERE THE TWO OUTFALL PIPES
 DISCHARGE INTO THE MASTER DRAINAGE SYSTEM.
  
 8. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET
 SFWMD ERP CRITERIA INCLUDING WATER QUALITY TREATMENT,
 PEAK FLOW ATTENUATION, C-51 BASIN FILL ENCROACHMENT,
 PERIMETER GRADING, ETC. SUBMIT A DRAINAGE REPORT WITH
 THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 9. LIST THE VERTICAL DATUM ON EVERY SHEET WITH
 ELEVATION INFORMATION. IF THE VERTICAL DATUM USED IN
 NOT NGVD1929 THEN PROVIDE THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO
 CALCULATE THE ELEVATIONS IN NGVD1929.
  
 10. THERE APPEARS TO BE A BERM ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY
 LINE. WHERE DOES THE RUNOFF FROM THE PARKING STALLS AT
 THE WEST END OF THE SOUTH PARKING AREA DRAIN TO? FLOW
 ARROWS INDICATE TOWARD THE BERM.
  
 11. WHAT MEASURES ARE BEING IMPLEMENTED TO PREVENT
 RUNOFF FROM THE SERVICE BAY/WAREHOUSE FROM FLOWING INTO
 THE DRAIANGE SYSTEM?
  
 12. CONNECT ROOF DRAINS TO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM OR
 DIRECT THE DISCHARGE TO PERVIOUS AREAS.
  
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
  
 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED
 WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. TURBIDITY
 CONTROLS MAY BE REQUIRED AT THE OUTFALLS INTO THE
 MASTER DRAINAGE SYSTEM.
  
 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP MODIFICATION AND
 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO STARTING
 CONSTRUCTION.
  
 4. PROVIDE LWDD ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
 WITHIN ITS DRAINAGE EASEMENT(S).
  
 5. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE LWDD DRAINAGE PERMIT.
  
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 03-17-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 03-17-2021 Time 14:11 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 01-19-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 01-19-2021 Time 08:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-01-19 08:23:101. NO RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS COMMENTS.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-29-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 10-29-2020 Time 07:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-10-29 08:03:561. ORIGINAL ACCESS EASEMENT WAS DEDICATED TO THE GOLDEN
 LAKES PLAZA POA PER PLAT. AS SUCH, A RELEASE OF
 SIGN-OFF IS REQUIRED.
 2. LWDD EASEMENT WILL NOW BE FENCED OFF AND ADDITIONAL
 IMPROVEMENTS ADDED. NEED SIGN-OFF AGREEING TO SAME.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-10-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 08-10-2020 Time 12:12 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-08-10 12:25:351. NEED TO HAVE LAW REVIEW THE DECLARATIONS AND
 AGREEMENTS FOR NEEDED SIGN-OFFS FROM OTHER POA MEMBERS.
 NEED COPIES OF ALL AGREEMENTS, DECLARATIONS, ETC.
 2. HAS THE VARIOUS PB COUNTY DEPT.'S SIGNED OFF ON THE
 CLOSURE OF THE ROADWAY/EASEMENTS?
 3. HOW WILL TRAFFIC COMING FROM THE WEST BE HANDLED? IT
 APPEARS THAT THEY WILL BE ROUTED INTO ADJOINING
 PROPERTY.
 4. NEED SIGN-OFF FROM LWDD AS THEIR EASEMENT IS
 AFFECTED.
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 5 Status P Date 04-29-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 04-29-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-04-29 20:30:43NO FURTHER COMMENTS
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 03-23-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 03-23-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-03-23 20:33:46TRAFFIC COMMENTS:
 1) PROVIDE A CROSSWALK ON THE SOUTH-EAST SIDE OF THE
 PROPERTY ACROSS THE SOUTH ACCESS ROAD
 2) PROVIDE A CROSSWALK ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE
 PROPERTY BETWEEN THE CONNECTION TO PUBLIC ROW AND
 PROPOSED 2-STORY OFFICE BUILDING ENTRANCE
 3) PROVIDE A CROSSWALK ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE
 PROPERTY ACROSS WEKIVA WAY
 4) INSTALL OR REPLACE ADA TACTILE MATS WHERE MISSING OR
 NEEDED. IDENTIFY SUCH FEATURE ON EITHER THE SITE OR
 CIVIL PLANS
  
 SITE COMMENTS:
 5) SHOW SOUTH ACCESS ROAD WIDTH DIMENSIONS
 5A. CURB TO CURB
 5B. TRAVEL LANE(S)
 6) SHOW PARKING STALLS' DIMENSIONS ALONG THE SOUTH
 ACCESS ROAD
 7) PROVIDE COLORED AUTOTURN ANALYSIS, SO TO PROPERLY
 DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN ROAD/BUILDING LINES AND VEHICLE'S
 DYNAMIC ENVELOPE
 8) PROVIDE SEPARATE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS OUTPUT FOR EACH
 VEHICLE PATH. CURRENT ANALYSIS IS NOT EASILY READABLE
 DUE TO MULTIPLE PATH OVERLAPS.
 9) GARBAGE-TRUCK AUTOTURN ANALYSIS SHOWS SEVERAL
 VEHICLE ENCROACHMENTS' INSTANCES:
 9A. SOUTH ENTRANCE BULB-OUT
 9B. PARKING STALLS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE SOUTHERN
 ACCESS ROAD
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 02-05-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 02-05-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-02-05 16:27:03TRAFFIC COMMENTS:
 1) PROVIDE RAISED CROSSWALK ON THE NORTH-WEST SIDE OF
 THE PROPERTY, IN ORDER TO MITIGATE THE INCREASE IN
 VEHICULAR TRAFFIC DUE TO THE DIVERSION PER THE SOUTH
 ACCESS ROAD CLOSURE
 2) AN EXCEPTION TO IMPLEMENT A THIRD ACCESS POINT ON
 THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY COULD BE PROVIDED.
 HOWEVER, THE EXISTING PUBLIC SIDEWALK CONNECTION NEEDS
 TO BE MAINTAINED. PLEASE PROVIDE A 6? SIDEWALK ON THE
 SOUTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY CONNECTING TO THE EXISTING
 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES.
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 11-06-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 11-06-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-11-06 15:42:37TRAFFIC COMMENTS:
  
 1) PROVIDE RAISED CROSSWALK ON THE NORTH-WEST SIDE OF
 THE PROPERTY, IN ORDER TO MITIGATE THE INCREASE IN
 VEHICULAR TRAFFIC DUE TO THE DIVERSION PER THE SOUTH
 ACCESS ROAD CLOSURE
 2) AN EXCEPTION TO IMPLEMENT A THIRD ACCESS POINT ALONG
 THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY COULD BE PROVIDED.
 HOWEVER, THE EXISTING PUBLIC SIDEWALK CONNECTION NEEDS
 TO BE MAINTAINED. PLEASE PROVIDE A 6' SIDEWALK ON THE
 SOUTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY CONNECTING TO THE EXISTING
 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES.
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-13-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 08-13-2020 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-08-13 12:24:01TRAFFIC COMMENTS:
  
 PROVIDE AUTOTURN FOR:
 OTRUCK ACCESSING AND LEAVING THE LOADING ZONE
 OSERVICE TRUCK COLLECTING AND MANEUVERING OUT OF THE
 GARBAGE AREA
  
 PROVIDE RAISED CROSSWALK AT THE FRONT ENTRANCE
  
 ONLY 2 DRIVEWAY ACCESSES ARE ALLOWED ONTO EACH
 RIGHT-OF-WAY. THERE ARE THREE ON WEKIVA WAY. ONE MUST
 BE REMOVED
  
 GATED DRIVEWAY IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY,
 REVISIT IT ACCORDINGLY
  
 PER THE PARTIAL CLOSURE OF THE ACCESS ROAD:
 OPROVIDE ACCESS EASEMENT DOCUMENTATION FROM THE
 ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
 OANALYZE TRAFFIC IMPACT AND TRIP DIVERSION
  
 SITE COMMENTS:
 PROVIDE SIDEWALK ON THE EAST AND WEST SIDE OF THE
 PROPOSED BUILDING WITH A MINIMUM OF 48? WIDTH
  
 DUMPSTER LOCATION LOOKS FAR AWAY FROM THE BUILDING AND
 BEHIND GATES
 OHOW IS GARBAGE TAKEN FROM THE BUILDING TO THE
 DUMPSTER?
 OHOW DOES THE CITY SERVICE TRUCK ACCESS THE DUMPSTER
 BEHIND THE GATES?
  
 EXPLAIN THE FUNCTIONALITY OF THE LOADING ZONE, AS IT IS
 SEPARATED FROM THE SERVICE BAY, AND OPERATIONAL
 FEASIBILITY DUE TO ITS PROXIMITY TO THE GATE
  
 PROVIDE UTILITY PLANS
  
 PROVIDE SITE PHOTOMETRICS
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 03-25-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 03-25-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 03-25-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-03-25 13:02:27ZONING REVIEW
  
 HULETT PLACE COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT MAJOR
 AMENDMENT | PB 1594C
  
 7670 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD | Z20070009
  
 *******************************************************
 *******************************************************
 *****
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. THE APPLICANT WILL
 BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE FOR ALL SUBSEQUENT
 SUBMITTALS. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL
 APPLICATION FEE.
  
 -WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE ONE-STORY SERVICE BAY?
 (SHEET S-1 SITE PLAN) (SATISFIED)
  
 -WHAT ARE THE TIMES THAT THE GATES IN THE DRIVE AISLES
 WILL BE OPEN/CLOSED? (SHEET S-1 SITE PLAN) (SATISFIED)
  
 -WILL THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE GATES REMAIN OPEN OR ONLY
 ON TRASH PICKUP DAY? (SHEET S-1 SITE PLAN) (SATISFIED)
  
 -PROVIDE THE DIMENSION OF THE LOADING ZONE. (SHEET S-1
 SITE PLAN) (SATISFIED)
  
 -THE WAVE BICYCLE RACK IS NOT PERMITTED BY CODE. PLEASE
 SEE THE BICYCLE PARKING DESIGN MANUAL FOR PERMITTED
 DESIGNS. (SHEET S-1 SITE PLAN) (SATISFIED)
  
 -CONSIDER MOVING THE BICYCLE RACK LOCATION CLOSER TO
 THE ENTRANCE OF THE BUILDING. (CONSIDERED)
  
 -PROVIDE A DIMENSIONED DETAIL OF THE BICYCLE PAD.
 (SATISFIED)
  
 -PROPOSED SIGNAGE WILL BE UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT.
 (SEC. 94-408 - SIGN REGULATIONS) (ACKNOWLEDGED)
  
 -PROVIDE MORE DETAIL FOR THE OUTDOOR SEATING AREA ON
 THE ROOFTOP. WILL THERE BE SEATS/CHAIRS THERE? (SHEET
 A-1.03 ACCESSIBLE ROOF PLAN) (SATISFIED)
  
 -PROVIDE MORE DETAIL ON THE MATERIAL OF THE ROOFTOP
 SCREENING. (SHEET A-1.03 ACCESSIBLE ROOF PLAN)
 (SATISFIED)
  
 -TOTAL PARKING SPACES IN TABLE INDICATED 205, BUT TOTAL
 IS ACTUALLY 204. (SATISFIED)
  
 -THE ABANDONMENT/CLOSING OFF OF THE UTILITY AND
 DRAINAGE EASEMENT/ ACCESS EASEMENT INVOLVED WITH THE
 RECONFIGURATION OF PARKING ON THE SOUTH PORTION OF THE
 LOT ISSUE (RECEIVED DOCUMENTATION ON EASEMENT AND HOLD
 HARMLESS AGREEMENT, SEE ENGINEERING COMMENT REGARDING
 THIS ISSUE.) (THIS PORTION HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE
 SITE PLAN. SATISFIED)
  
  
  
 ALANA WOOTEN
 PLANNER
 PLANNING DIVISION
 561-822-1449
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 01-22-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By awooten Date 01-22-2021 Time 11:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By awooten Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-01-22 11:34:41PPRC ZONING REVIEW
 HULETT PLACE COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT MAJOR
 AMENDMENT | PB 1594C
 7670 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD | Z20070009
  
  
 *******************************************************
 *******************************************************
 *****
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. THE APPLICANT WILL
 BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE FOR ALL SUBSEQUENT
 SUBMITTALS. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL
 APPLICATION FEE.
  
  
 -WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE ONE-STORY SERVICE BAY?
 (SHEET S-1 SITE PLAN) (SATISFIED)
  
 -WHAT ARE THE TIMES THAT THE GATES IN THE DRIVE AISLES
 WILL BE OPEN/CLOSED? (SHEET S-1 SITE PLAN) (SATISFIED)
  
 -WILL THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE GATES REMAIN OPEN OR ONLY
 ON TRASH PICKUP DAY? (SHEET S-1 SITE PLAN) (SATISFIED)
  
 -PROVIDE THE DIMENSION OF THE LOADING ZONE. (SHEET S-1
 SITE PLAN) (SATISFIED)
  
 -THE WAVE BICYCLE RACK IS NOT PERMITTED BY CODE. PLEASE
 SEE THE BICYCLE PARKING DESIGN MANUAL FOR PERMITTED
 DESIGNS. (SHEET S-1 SITE PLAN) (SATISFIED)
  
 -CONSIDER MOVING THE BICYCLE RACK LOCATION CLOSER TO
 THE ENTRANCE OF THE BUILDING. (CONSIDERED)
  
 -PROVIDE A DIMENSIONED DETAIL OF THE BICYCLE PAD.
 (SATISFIED)
  
 -PROPOSED SIGNAGE WILL BE UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT.
 (SEC. 94-408 - SIGN REGULATIONS) (ACKNOWLEDGED)
  
 -PROVIDE MORE DETAIL FOR THE OUTDOOR SEATING AREA ON
 THE ROOFTOP. WILL THERE BE SEATS/CHAIRS THERE? (SHEET
 A-1.03 ACCESSIBLE ROOF PLAN) (SATISFIED)
  
 -PROVIDE MORE DETAIL ON THE MATERIAL OF THE ROOFTOP
 SCREENING. (SHEET A-1.03 ACCESSIBLE ROOF PLAN)
 (SATISFIED)
  
 -TOTAL PARKING SPACES IN TABLE INDICATED 205, BUT TOTAL
 IS ACTUALLY 204. (SATISFIED)
  
 -THE ABANDONMENT/CLOSING OFF OF THE UTILITY AND
 DRAINAGE EASEMENT/ ACCESS EASEMENT INVOLVED WITH THE
 RECONFIGURATION OF PARKING ON THE SOUTH PORTION OF THE
 LOT ISSUE (RECEIVED DOCUMENTATION ON EASEMENT AND HOLD
 HARMLESS AGREEMENT, SEE ENGINEERING COMMENT REGARDING
 THIS ISSUE.) (UNSATISFIED)
  
  
  
 ALANA WOOTEN
 PLANNER
 PLANNING DIVISION
 561-822-1449
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-26-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 10-26-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 10-26-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-10-26 11:20:32PPRC ZONING REVIEW
 HULETT PLACE COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT MAJOR
 AMENDMENT | PB 1594C
 7670 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD | Z20070009 10/26/2020
 *******************************************************
 *******************************************************
 *****
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. THE APPLICANT WILL
 BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE FOR ALL SUBSEQUENT
 SUBMITTALS. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL
 APPLICATION FEE.
  
  
 -WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE ONE-STORY SERVICE BAY?
 (SHEET S-1 SITE PLAN) (SATISFIED)
  
 -WHAT ARE THE TIMES THAT THE GATES IN THE DRIVE AISLES
 WILL BE OPEN/CLOSED? (SHEET S-1 SITE PLAN) (SATISFIED)
  
 -WILL THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE GATES REMAIN OPEN OR ONLY
 ON TRASH PICKUP DAY? (SHEET S-1 SITE PLAN) (SATISFIED)
  
 -PROVIDE THE DIMENSION OF THE LOADING ZONE. (SHEET S-1
 SITE PLAN) (SATISFIED)
  
 -THE WAVE BICYCLE RACK IS NOT PERMITTED BY CODE. PLEASE
 SEE THE BICYCLE PARKING DESIGN MANUAL FOR PERMITTED
 DESIGNS. (SHEET S-1 SITE PLAN) (SATISFIED)
  
 -CONSIDER MOVING THE BICYCLE RACK LOCATION CLOSER TO
 THE ENTRANCE OF THE BUILDING. (CONSIDERED)
  
 -PROVIDE A DIMENSIONED DETAIL OF THE BICYCLE PAD.
 (SATISFIED)
  
 -PROPOSED SIGNAGE WILL BE UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT.
 (SEC. 94-408 - SIGN REGULATIONS) (ACKNOWLEDGED)
  
 -PROVIDE MORE DETAIL FOR THE OUTDOOR SEATING AREA ON
 THE ROOFTOP. WILL THERE BE SEATS/CHAIRS THERE? (SHEET
 A-1.03 ACCESSIBLE ROOF PLAN) (SATISFIED)
  
 -PROVIDE MORE DETAIL ON THE MATERIAL OF THE ROOFTOP
 SCREENING. (SHEET A-1.03 ACCESSIBLE ROOF PLAN)
 (SATISFIED)
  
 -TOTAL PARKING SPACES IN TABLE INDICATED 205, BUT TOTAL
 IS ACTUALLY 204. (NEW COMMENT)
  
 -THE ABANDONMENT/CLOSING OFF OF THE UTILITY AND
 DRAINAGE EASEMENT/ ACCESS EASEMENT INVOLVED WITH THE
 RECONFIGURATION OF PARKING ON THE SOUTH PORTION OF THE
 LOT ISSUE (RECEIVED DOCUMENTATION ON EASEMENT AND HOLD
 HARMLESS AGREEMENT, SEE ENGINEERING COMMENT REGARDING
 THIS ISSUE.)
  
  
  
 ALANA WOOTEN
 PLANNER
 PLANNING DIVISION
 561-822-1449
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-12-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 08-12-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-08-12 15:50:26PPRC ZONING REVIEW
 HULETT PLACE COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT MAJOR
 AMENDMENT | PB 1594C
 7670 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD | Z20070009
  
 -WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE ONE-STORY SERVICE BAY?
 (SHEET S-1 SITE PLAN)
  
 -WHAT ARE THE TIMES THAT THE GATES IN THE DRIVE AISLES
 WILL BE OPEN/CLOSED? (SHEET S-1 SITE PLAN)
  
 -WILL THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE GATES REMAIN OPEN OR ONLY
 ON TRASH PICKUP DAY? (SHEET S-1 SITE PLAN)
  
 -PROVIDE THE DIMENSION OF THE LOADING ZONE. (SHEET S-1
 SITE PLAN)
  
 -THE WAVE BICYCLE RACK IS NOT PERMITTED BY CODE. PLEASE
 SEE THE BICYCLE PARKING DESIGN MANUAL FOR PERMITTED
 DESIGNS. (SHEET S-1 SITE PLAN)
  
 -CONSIDER MOVING THE BICYCLE RACK LOCATION CLOSER TO
 THE ENTRANCE OF THE BUILDING.
  
 -PROVIDE A DIMENSIONED DETAIL OF THE BICYCLE PAD.
  
 -PROPOSED SIGNAGE WILL BE UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT.
 (SEC. 94-408 - SIGN REGULATIONS)
  
 -PROVIDE MORE DETAIL FOR THE OUTDOOR SEATING AREA ON
 THE ROOFTOP. WILL THERE BE SEATS/CHAIRS THERE? (SHEET
 A-1.03 ACCESSIBLE ROOF PLAN)
  
 -PROVIDE MORE DETAIL ON THE MATERIAL OF THE ROOFTOP
 SCREENING. (SHEET A-1.03 ACCESSIBLE ROOF PLAN)
  
 -THE ABANDONMENT/CLOSING OFF OF THE UTILITY AND
 DRAINAGE EASEMENT/ ACCESS EASEMENT INVOLVED WITH THE
 RECONFIGURATION OF PARKING ON THE SOUTH PORTION OF THE
 LOT HAS BEEN DISCUSSED BEFORE WITH STAFF AND THE
 FOLLOWING REQUIREMENT HAS STILL NOT BEEN MET FROM ERIC
 SCHNEIDER IN 2018 ADDRESSED BELOW:
  
 -THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION REVIEWS
 PROJECTS PURSUANT TO THE TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
 RELATING TO COUNTY-WIDE TRAFFICE CONCURRENCY. THE CITY
 WANTS TO MAKE SURE THAT THE ACCESS EASMENT WAS NOT
 REQUIRED AS A PART OF THE TRAFFIC DIVISION MODELING FOR
 CARS ON OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD (TO ENSURE THE ROADWAY WAS
 NOT REQUIRED AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR TRIP
 GENERATION/CONCURRENCY, ETC.) FOR EXAMPLE, THE ACCESS
 EASEMENT PERMITS USERS OF THE GOLDEN LAKES PLAZA TO
 ACCESS THE LIGHT AT GOLDEN LAKES BOULEVARD INSTEAD OF
 HAVING TO U-TURN ON OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD TO GO WEST,
 WHICH MAY HAVE BEEN A REASON FOR THE ACCESS EASEMENT.
 (ALSO SEE COMMENTS FROM ENGINEERING, SURVEYING AND
 TRAFFIC AS IT PERTAINS TO THIS ISSUE.)
  
 ALANA WOOTEN
 PLANNER
 PLANNING DIVISION
 561-822-1449
 [email protected]
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved