City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Details - Project Z20050017

Plan Review Stops For Project Z20050017

Review Stop	B		BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC		ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	FIRE		FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	10-23-2020			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	10-23-2020	Time	16:32	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	10-23-2020	Time	16:32	Sent To

Notes

2020-10-23 16:32:59	FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	561-822-1462
	PROJECT: BROWARD BLOCK DSI Z20050017
	OCTOBER 23, 2020
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

	1. SATISFIED. UPDATE COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
	PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
	MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
	TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
	LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
	FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
	FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	06-08-2020			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	06-08-2020	Time	11:04	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	06-08-2020	Time	11:04	Sent To

Notes

2020-06-08 11:04:30	FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	561-822-1462
	PROJECT: BROWARD BLOCK DSI Z20050017
	JUNE 8, 2020
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

	1. UPDATE COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT
	SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL
	ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT
	SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF
	SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA
	WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA
	LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE.

Review Stop	PARK		PARKING
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	POLICE		POLICE
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	PW		PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	STORM		STORMWATER
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	SURVEY		SURVEYING
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	TRAFFIC		TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	10-16-2020			Cont ID
Sent By	jroach			Date	10-16-2020	Time	14:09	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jroach			Date	10-16-2020	Time	14:09	Sent To

Notes

2020-10-16 14:09:48	PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
	________________________________________

	DATE OF REVIEW: 06.08.2020
	PROJECT NO.: Z20050017
	CASE NO.: PB 1617B
	________________________________________

	PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
	REVIEW COMMENTS:

	1. [ SATISFIED ] - THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THE
	JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT IS DATED FEBRUARY 2, 2020, BUT
	THE HARD COPY INCLUDED IN THE SUBMITTAL IS MAY 15,
	2020. ALL DOCUMENTS (HARD COPY AND ELECTRONIC) NEED TO
	BE CONSISTENT.

	2. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - THE VARIANCE AND WAIVER
	TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN SHOULD BE MODIFIED TO SHOW WHAT
	IS REQUIRED, WHAT WAS APPROVED BY THE ZBA (ZBA CASE NO.
	3285), AND WHAT IS PROPOSED WITH THE CURRENT SUBMITTAL.
	THE VARIANCE TABLE SHOULD REFERENCE THE ZBA CASE NO.,
	NOT THE RESOLUTION.

	2.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - IF SYMBOLS ARE BEING ASSIGNED TO
	EACH VARIANCE / WAIVER AND IDENTIFIED ON THE PLAN YOU
	CANNOT USE THE SAME SYMBOL TWICE. FOR EXAMPLE, A
	TRIANGLE WITH THE NUMBER 1 IS SHOWN FOR THE NORTH
	SETBACK, BUT ALSO THE WAIVER REGARDING CENTERING OF
	OPENINGS.

	3. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - THE VARIANCE AND WAIVER
	TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN NEEDS TO BE UPDATED TO REFLECT
	THE VARIANCES/WAIVERS THAT WERE ACTUALLY GRANTED BY THE
	ZBA. THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN CORRECTED WITH THE ORIGINAL
	APPROVALS.

	3.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - IF SYMBOLS ARE BEING ASSIGNED TO
	EACH VARIANCE / WAIVER AND IDENTIFIED ON THE PLAN YOU
	CANNOT USE THE SAME SYMBOL TWICE. FOR EXAMPLE, A
	TRIANGLE WITH THE NUMBER 1 IS SHOWN FOR THE NORTH
	SETBACK, BUT ALSO THE WAIVER REGARDING CENTERING OF
	OPENINGS.

	4. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE
	PROPOSED REPLACEMENT OF THE GROUND FLOOR RESIDENTIAL
	UNITS WITH RESIDENTIAL STORAGE AND MECHANICAL ROOMS.
	AND WHY DOES RESIDENT STORAGE AREAS NEED BATHROOMS?

	4.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - THE FLOOR PLAN SHOWN ON SHEET
	SP-1 DOES NOT MATCH THAT WHICH IS SHOWN ON SHEET A2.10.

	5. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE
	ELEVATIONS HAS COMPLETELY BEEN MODIFIED FROM THE
	ORIGINAL APPROVAL. THESE CHANGES ARE NOT MENTIONED IN
	THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT, AND STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT
	THE NEW DESIGN.

	5.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - STAFF STILL DOES NOT SUPPORT THE
	PROPOSED DESIGN OF THE BUILDING. THERE CONTINUES TO BE
	ISSUES WITH HOW THE GROUND FLOOR AND STAIRCASES ARE
	BEING TREATED ON THE EAST FA?ADE, LACK OF ARCHITECTURAL
	TREATMENT ON THE SOUTH FA?ADE, ETC.

	6. [ SATISFIED ] - GLAZING CALCULATIONS SHALL BE
	PROVIDED FOR EACH STREET FACADE. THE ENTIRE FACADE
	SHALL BE BETWEEN 25-45 PERCENT.

	7. [ SATISFIED ] - STOREFRONT GLAZING IS ONLY PERMITTED
	AT RETAIL FRONTAGE LOCATIONS. ALL OTHER WINDOWS SHALL
	BE OPERABLE.

	8. [ SATISFIED ] - THE BOLD LINE ON THE SITE PLAN
	(IDENTIFYING THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT) DOES NOT MATCH
	THAT WHICH IS SHOWN ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS;
	SPECIFICALLY, THE AREA IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER, AND THE
	SOUTH SIDE, OF THE BUILDING.

	9. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - DIMENSIONS OF THE GROUND FLOOR
	SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM FINISHED FLOOR TO FINISHED
	CEILING.

	9.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - THE RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
	INDICATES THAT DIMENSIONS ARE PROVIDED ON SHEES A3.01
	AND A3.02 BUT NO SHEETS WITH THOSE PAGES NUMBERS WERE
	PROVIDED. ON THE ELEVATIONS (SHEETS A3.10 AND A3.20)
	THERE ARE DIMENSIONS BUT IT DOES NOT STATE WHERE THEY
	ARE MEASURED TO OR FROM. PURSUANT TO THE REGULATIONS,
	DIMENSIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE GROUND FLOOR FROM
	FINISHED FLOOR TO FINISHED CEILING.

	10. [ SATISFIED ] - SETBACK FROM THE EAST PROPERTY LINE
	SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE GROUND FLOOR (NO INCLUDING
	THE OPEN STAIRCASE).

	11. [ SATISFIED ] - ONLY ONE (1) SITE PLAN SHALL BE
	PROVIDED; PLEASE CLARIFY THE NEED FOR THE ARCHITECTURAL
	SITE PLAN.

	12. WINDOW DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH WINDOW
	TYPE, CONFIRMING THE FOLLOWING:

	12.1. [ SATISFIED ] - ALL WINDOWS, EXCEPTED PERMITTED
	STOREFRONTS, SHALL BE OPERABLE.

	12.2. [ SATISFIED ] - ALL WINDOWS SHALL BE RECESSED A
	MINIMUM OF TWO (2) INCHES FROM THE EXTERIOR FACE OF THE
	FACADE.

	13. [ SATISFIED ] - IS THE ENTRY DRIVE PROPOSED TO BE
	GATED? NOTHING IS LABELED BUT GATES APPEAR TO BE SHOWN.
	IF GATED, STAFF HAS THE SAME CONCERNS THAT WERE
	PRESENTED PREVIOUSLY. NO CALL BOX IS SHOWN AND WHAT
	PLANS ARE IN PLACE REGARDING GUEST ACCESS?

	14. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - HOW IS THE SOUTH SETBACK
	THE SAME AS WHAT WAS PROPOSED PREVIOUSLY, BUT THE
	BUILDING SEPARATION HAS INCREASED BY ONE (1) FOOT? THE
	DIMENSION LINE SEEMS TO BE GOING INSIDE OF THE BUILDING
	FACADE LINE THAT IS SHOWN.

	14.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - THE SHEET SP-1 AND A2.10
	INDICATE DIFFERENT DIMENSIONS BETWEEN THE PROPOSED
	BUILDING AND THE EXISTING BUILDING TO THE SOUTH. ENSURE
	THAT ALL PLANS ARE CONSISTENT AND ACCURATE.

	15. [ SATISFIED ] - DIMENSION OF BALCONY ENCROACHMENT
	INTO THE SETBACK SHALL BE PROVIDED.

	16. [ SATISFIED ] - OVERHANGS SHALL NOT ENCROACH MORE
	THAN THREE (3) FEET INTO THE REQUIRED SETBACK.

	17. [ SATISFIED ] - DIMENSION SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM
	THE WEST PROPERTY LINE TO THE EASTERN CORNER OF THE ROW
	OF PARKING. THIS DIMENSION SHALL BE AT LEAST 18 FEET 1
	INCH.

	18. [ SATISFIED ] - LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE EAST
	PROPERTY LINE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF SIX (6) FEET.

	19. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - IS A WALL PROPOSED ON THE
	SOUTH PROPERTY LINE, EXTENDING ALL THE WAY TO THE EAST
	PROPERTY LINE? IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THIS WALL STOP
	AND TIE INTO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE BUILDING.

	19.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - DIFFERENT SYMBOLISM SHOULD BE
	USED TO DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN FENCING AND PRIVACY WALL.

	20. [ SATISFIED ] - DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED OF THE
	PROPOSED SIX (6) FOOT FENCE THAT IS JUST EAST OF THE
	ANGLED PARKING SPACES.

	21. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - LANDSCAPE ISLAND SHALL BE
	PROVIDED AT THE NORTH AND SOUTH ENDS OF THE UNCOVERED
	PARKING ROW.

	21.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND AT THE
	NORTH END IS DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM DIMENSIONS (I.E.
	IS NOT THE FULL LENGTH OF THE STALL).

	22. [ SATISFIED ] - LANDSCAPE ISLAND SHALL BE PROVIDED
	AT THE WEST END OF THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING ROW.

	23. [ NEW COMMENT ] - BIKE RACKS SHALL BE PROVIDED NEAR
	OR ADJACENT TO THE LOBBY/LEASING OFFICE THAT ARE
	ACCESSIBLE FOR GUESTS, POTENTIAL TENANTS, ETC.

	24. [ NEW COMMENT ] - THE LABELS FOR THE COMPACT SPACES
	DO NOT LINE UP CORRECTLY WITH THE SPACES DRAWN.

	25. [ NEW COMMENT ] - SHEET SP-1 INDICATES THAT THERE
	IS A LIGHT POLE ON BROWARD AVENUE THAT IS TO BE
	RELOCATED BY THE CITY DURING ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS. THIS
	LIGHT POLE IS IN THE MIDDLE OF THE ENTRANCE DRIVE AND
	WILL NEED TO BE RELOCATED BY THE DEVELOPER AS PART OF
	THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.

	26. [ NEW COMMENT ] - IN ADDITION TO THE INCONSISTENCY
	REFERENCED IN COMMENT 14.1 ABOVE, THERE ARE A NUMBER OF
	DIMENSIONAL VARIATIONS BETWEEN SHEET SP-1 AND A.2.10.
	________________________________________

	PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:

	A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
	DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.

	B) PDFS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
	PROVIDED.

	C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.

	D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
	ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
	CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
	REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.

	E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
	RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
	COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
	APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
	WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
	________________________________________

	QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:

	JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
	CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
	401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
	WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402

	P: 561.822.1448
	TTY: 800.955.8771
	E: [email protected]

	W: WPB.ORG

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	06-08-2020			Cont ID
Sent By	jroach			Date	06-08-2020	Time	13:36	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jroach			Date	06-08-2020	Time	13:36	Sent To

Notes

2020-06-08 13:37:03	PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
	________________________________________

	DATE OF REVIEW: 06.08.2020
	PROJECT NO.: Z20050017
	CASE NO.: PB 1617B
	________________________________________

	PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
	REVIEW COMMENTS:

	1. THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THE JUSTIFICATION
	STATEMENT IS DATED FEBRUARY 2, 2020, BUT THE HARD COPY
	INCLUDED IN THE SUBMITTAL IS MAY 15, 2020. ALL
	DOCUMENTS (HARD COPY AND ELECTRONIC) NEED TO BE
	CONSISTENT.

	2. THE VARIANCE AND WAIVER TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN
	SHOULD BE MODIFIED TO SHOW WHAT IS REQUIRED, WHAT WAS
	APPROVED BY THE ZBA (ZBA CASE NO. 3285), AND WHAT IS
	PROPOSED WITH THE CURRENT SUBMITTAL. THE VARIANCE TABLE
	SHOULD REFERENCE THE ZBA CASE NO., NOT THE RESOLUTION.

	3. THE VARIANCE AND WAIVER TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN NEEDS
	TO BE UPDATED TO REFLECT THE VARIANCES/WAIVERS THAT
	WERE ACTUALLY GRANTED BY THE ZBA. THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN
	CORRECTED WITH THE ORIGINAL APPROVALS.

	4. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE PROPOSED REPLACEMENT OF
	THE GROUND FLOOR RESIDENTIAL UNITS WITH RESIDENTIAL
	STORAGE AND MECHANICAL ROOMS. AND WHY DOES RESIDENT
	STORAGE AREAS NEED BATHROOMS?

	5. THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE ELEVATIONS HAS COMPLETELY
	BEEN MODIFIED FROM THE ORIGINAL APPROVAL. THESE CHANGES
	ARE NOT MENTIONED IN THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT, AND
	STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE NEW DESIGN.

	6. GLAZING CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH
	STREET FA?ADE. THE ENTIRE FA?ADE SHALL BE BETWEEN 25-45
	PERCENT.

	7. STOREFRONT GLAZING IS ONLY PERMITTED AT RETAIL
	FRONTAGE LOCATIONS. ALL OTHER WINDOWS SHALL BE
	OPERABLE.

	8. THE BOLD LINE ON THE SITE PLAN (IDENTIFYING THE
	BUILDING FOOTPRINT) DOES NOT MATCH THAT WHICH IS SHOWN
	ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS; SPECIFICALLY, THE AREA IN
	THE NORTHWEST CORNER, AND THE SOUTH SIDE, OF THE
	BUILDING.

	9. DIMENSIONS OF THE GROUND FLOOR SHALL BE PROVIDED
	FROM FINISHED FLOOR TO FINISHED CEILING.

	10. SETBACK FROM THE EAST PROPERTY LINE SHALL BE
	PROVIDED FOR THE GROUND FLOOR (NO INCLUDING THE OPEN
	STAIRCASE).

	11. ONLY ONE (1) SITE PLAN SHALL BE PROVIDED; PLEASE
	CLARIFY THE NEED FOR THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN.

	12. WINDOW DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH WINDOW
	TYPE, CONFIRMING THE FOLLOWING:

	12.1. ALL WINDOWS, EXCEPTED PERMITTED STOREFRONTS,
	SHALL BE OPERABLE.

	12.2. ALL WINDOWS SHALL BE RECESSED A MINIMUM OF TWO
	(2) INCHES FROM THE EXTERIOR FACE OF THE FA?ADE.

	13. IS THE ENTRY DRIVE PROPOSED TO BE GATED? NOTHING IS
	LABELED BUT GATES APPEAR TO BE SHOWN. IF GATED, STAFF
	HAS THE SAME CONCERNS THAT WERE PRESENTED PREVIOUSLY.
	NO CALL BOX IS SHOWN AND WHAT PLANS ARE IN PLACE
	REGARDING GUEST ACCESS?

	14. HOW IS THE SOUTH SETBACK THE SAME AS WHAT WAS
	PROPOSED PREVIOUSLY, BUT THE BUILDING SEPARATION HAS
	INCREASED BY ONE (1) FOOT? THE DIMENSION LINE SEEMS TO
	BE GOING INSIDE OF THE BUILDING FA?ADE LINE THAT IS
	SHOWN.

	15. DIMENSION OF BALCONY ENCROACHMENT INTO THE SETBACK
	SHALL BE PROVIDED.

	16. OVERHANGS SHALL NOT ENCROACH MORE THAN THREE (3)
	FEET INTO THE REQUIRED SETBACK.
	17. DIMENSION SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM THE WEST PROPERTY
	LINE TO THE EASTERN CORNER OF THE ROW OF PARKING. THIS
	DIMENSION SHALL BE AT LEAST 18 FEET 1 INCH.

	18. LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE SHALL
	BE A MINIMUM OF SIX (6) FEET.

	19. IS A WALL PROPOSED ON THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE,
	EXTENDING ALL THE WAY TO THE EAST PROPERTY LINE? IT IS
	RECOMMENDED THAT THIS WALL STOP AND TIE INTO THE
	SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE BUILDING.

	20. DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED OF THE PROPOSED SIX (6)
	FOOT FENCE THAT IS JUST EAST OF THE ANGLED PARKING
	SPACES.

	21. LANDSCAPE ISLAND SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE NORTH AND
	SOUTH ENDS OF THE UNCOVERED PARKING ROW.

	22. LANDSCAPE ISLAND SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE WEST END
	OF THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING ROW.
	________________________________________

	PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:

	A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
	DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.

	B) FOUR (4) SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS
	SHALL BE PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY
	(11IN X 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.

	C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.

	D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
	ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
	CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
	REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.

	E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
	RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
	COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
	APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
	WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
	________________________________________

	QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:

	JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
	CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
	401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
	WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402

	P: 561.822.1448
	TTY: 800.955.8771
	E: [email protected]

	W: WPB.ORG