 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z20040014
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z20040014 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-13-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
05-11-2020 |
Time |
14:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
05-13-2020 |
Time |
17:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-05-13 18:03:19 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AN ASBESTOS | | | SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT | | | REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963, | | | OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 3. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR | | | THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, | | | AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 4. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE | | | REQUIRED. FOR INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED TYPE, SIZE | | | AND LOCATION, PLEASE CONTACT TIM LARGE, CHIEF PLUMBING | | | INSPECTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AT (561) | | | 805-6692, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 5. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, | | | FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, | | | GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, | | | SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 6. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER | | | AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY, | | | INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE | | | CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION | | | THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY. | | | | | | 7. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. IF THE PROJECT COST OF THE | | | VERTICAL CONSTRUCTION FOR THE GAS STATION AND CANOPY | | | EXCEEDS $750,000, THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT TO ART | | | IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE ON THE | | | PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP | | | ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC | | | PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-06-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
08-06-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
08-06-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-12-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
05-12-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
05-12-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-05-12 11:30:18 | 1. THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF | | | REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY | | | AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND | | | WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE | | | DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK | | | BELOW: HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH= | | | ~\WPB_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION | | | -FULL-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC0 | | | 2A97B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF | | | 2. CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, | | | FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08, ADOPTED | | | SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18), CHAPTER 90 | | | UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. SEC. 90-7. | | | POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER SERVICE | | | FACILITIES OF THE CITY. | | | THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE | | | CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY | | | BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS, | | | BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION. | | | 3. AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR | | | MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI | | | CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL | | | 4. PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS | | | OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES, | | | INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND | | | SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, | | | METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE | | | SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING | | | GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, | | | ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL | | | INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER | | | LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE | | | PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN | | | VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. | | | PLEASE SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT | | | MATERIAL. ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL | | | EXISTING AND PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, | | | INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & | | | TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL | | | UTILITY CROSSINGS. | | | 5. CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY | | | ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY | | | ROW. | | | 6. PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE | | | DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB | | | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION). | | | 7. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND | | | PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM | | | AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE | | | PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER. | | | 8. SHOW VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION INFORMATION | | | (NAVD 88 AND NGVD 29). | | | 9. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDRESS ON ALL PLAN SHEETS. | | | 10. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND | | | IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED | | | AREAS. | | | 11. PLEASE LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE | | | APPLICABLE. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD | | | CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, | | | PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]: | | | | | | -LOCATION APPEARS TO BE OUT OF WPB UTILITIES WATER | | | SERVICE AREA. PLAN DESIGNER NEEDS TO CONFIRM OWNERSHIP | | | OF WATER MAINS ON 45TH ST & MILITARY TRAIL AND VERIFY | | | IF THEY CAN BE USED FOR WATER SERVICES ON SITE. | | | -EXISTING WPB WATER SERVICES OFF OF 45TH ST OR MILITARY | | | TRL THAT CANNOT BE USED, OR WILL NOT BE USED, NEED TO | | | BE CUT BACK AND CAPPED. | | | -VERIFY ALL EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTS ARE SHOWN ON THE | | | PLANS. MAY BE MISSING SOME. | | | -IS DEVELOPER AWARE THAT A NEW WAWA IS BEING BUILT AT | | | 45TH ST & I-95? | | | | | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | CONCERNS, THANKS. | | | RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES | | | DEPARTMENT | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-11-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
05-11-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
05-11-2020 |
Time |
10:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-05-11 10:38:24 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE | | | OCCUPANCY TYPE, PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE.. | | | | | | 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE | | | LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER | | | SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED | | | ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | THE LOCATION OF THE FIRE HYDRANT IS ACCEPTABLE WITH ANY | | | CHANGES CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE | | | PREVENTION. | | | | | | 9.IF REQUIRED, PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE | | | ALARM PER THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE | | | SAFETY ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE | | | ALARM, ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FS | | | 61G AND SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PERMIT. | | | | | | 9A) THE LOCATION OF ANY APPLICABLE DDCV AND FIRE LINE | | | LOCATIONS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND | | | SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, | | | THE CITY'S ENGINEERS OFFICE, THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND | | | THE CITY'S PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE. | | | | | | 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE | | | SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY | | | DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS. | | | | | | 12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
12-02-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
12-02-2020 |
Time |
15:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
12-02-2020 |
Time |
15:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-12-02 15:39:47 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: PRIME DEVELOPMENT CPD AND WAWA Z20040014 | | | DECEMBER 2, 2020 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THE SURVEY, SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOW | | | INCONSISTENCIES WITH THE OVERALL LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS | | | . THESE NEED TO BE CORRECTED TO DO AN ACCURATE AND | | | COMPLETE LANDSCAPE REVIEW. SITE CALCULATIONS MUST BE | | | BASED ON THE TOTAL LOT PER SECTION 94-442, AND DESIGN | | | GUIDELINES MUST DEFINE HOW EACH SITE PLAN WILL MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENTS AND HOW THE OVERALL REQUIREMENTS WILL BE | | | ADDRESSED AS EACH SITE PLAN IS SUBMITTED. | | | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLANT LIST WITH SPECIES AND | | | SIZES FOR THE LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. | | | | | | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE SEGMENT MEASUREMENT AND | | | REQUIRED TREES INCLUDING PORTIONS OF THE 30 FOOT | | | CALCULATION (ROUND UP) FOR ALL BUFFER SEGMENTS. SHOW | | | PROVIDED NUMBER FOR EACH SEGMENT. | | | INCLUDE PORTIONS IN REQUIRED, ROUND UP FOR PARTIAL | | | TREES. | | | | | | ? SEE COMMENT #25. DESIGN GUIDELINES DO NOT ADDRESS HOW | | | THE CALCULATION OF REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH AREA WILL BE | | | HANDLED. DEFINE WHEN THE BUFFER SEGMENTS WILL BE | | | INSTALLED THAT ARE INCLUDED IN EACH AFFECTED AREA. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN BASED ON | | | THE TREE SURVEY AND SHOW ALL EXISTING TREES TO BE | | | PRESERVED, RELOCATED OR REMOVED. SOME TREES HAVE BEEN | | | REMOVED FROM AREAS OF THE SITE WITHOUT A PERMIT. THIS | | | NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED. | | | ? SATISFIED. IDENTIFY TREES ALREADY REMOVED AS SUCH ON | | | THE CHART. | | | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TREE CANOPY DIAMETER FOR ALL | | | TREES. | | | ADD A COLUMN PROVIDING THE CANOPY DIAMETER. | | | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CATEGORY SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR | | | TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET IN DIAMETER AND PALMS FOR ANY | | | REMOVALS FOR MITIGATION DUE. | | | CORRECT BASED ON CANOPY DIAMETER. | | | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR ANY | | | TREES 20 FEET OR MORE IN CANOPY DIAMETER. | | | CANNOT VERIFY WITHOUT CANOPY DIAMETER. | | | ? SATISFIED. INDIVIDUAL IDENTIFYING NUMBERS ON THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN ARE VERY DIFFICULT TO READ. REVISE TO | | | MAKE THEM CLEAR. | | | ? SATISFIED. IDENTIFY WHETHER FICUS BENJAMINAS ARE PART | | | OF AN UNMAINTAINED HEDGE, OR ARE INDIVIDUAL TREES. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL TREE CANOPY SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE PROVIDED WITH THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN ON | | | THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN, AS WELL AS THE TOTAL | | | PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED. | | | SHOW TOTAL PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL AND CALCULATE CANOPY | | | CREDITS FOR TREES BEING ADDED FOR THE PROPOSED AFFECTED | | | AREA. DEFINE WHEN THE TREES WILL BE REMOVED AND WHEN | | | MITIGATION WILL BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE | | | TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR | | | RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY | | | EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR | | | POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE CONDITION FOR ALL EXISTING | | | TREES AND PALMS AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE | | | TREES AND PALMS. | | | | | | PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS REPORT ON THE CONDITION AND REASON | | | THAT THE TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED CANNOT BE | | | RELOCATED. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. THERE ARE EXISTING LIVE OAK TREES IN THE | | | NORTH BUFFER AND ADJACENT TO THE CELL TOWER COMPOUND. | | | THESE ARE BASED ON AN APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT | | | MEETS THE SCREENING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE TOWER AND | | | EQUIPMENT. ANY CHANGES PROPOSED TO THE APPROVED | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN NEED TO BE SHOWN AND INCLUDED ON THE | | | MASTER PLAN. | | | | | | EXPLAIN THE REASON FOR REMOVAL OF LIVE OAK TREE QV-13. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. THE PROPERTY LINE CHANGE FOR RIGHT OF WAY | | | DEDICATION NEEDS TO BE FINALIZED TO DETERMINE THE | | | LOCATION OF OVERHEAD POWER LINES, AS THIS WILL DIRECTLY | | | AFFECT THE RIGHT TREE RIGHT PLACE CONDITIONS AND | | | LOCATIONS FOR THE LANDSCAPE BUFFERS. UNDERGROUNDING OF | | | POWER LINES THAT WILL BE RELOCATED NEEDS TO BE | | | ADDRESSED. | | | 7. SATISFIED. LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS AND | | | LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND LINES MUST BE SHOWN, AS THE | | | TRANSFORMERS MUST BE SCREENED, AND LOCATIONS CANNOT | | | DISPLACE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING. THIS SHOULD ALSO BE | | | ADDRESSED IN THE DESIGN GUIDELINES. | | | 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | LANDSCAPE CHART TO REFLECT CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENT OF | | | 50 POINTS USING THE DESIGN OPTIONS CONSISTENT WITH | | | CURRENT CODE 94-442(G). | | | | | | WAWA LANDSCAPE PLAN: | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. ALL REFERENCES TO LOT NEED TO BE CHANGED | | | TO AFFECTED SITE PLAN AREA OR SIMILAR, AS THE APPLICANT | | | HAS INDICATED THIS WILL NOT BE SUBDIVIDED INTO A | | | SEPARATE LOT. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. THERE IS NO WAY OF TELLING THE PARKING | | | AND LOADING AREAS ADJACENT TO THE INTERNAL ROAD, | | | RESULTING IN LARGE CONTINUOUS AREAS OF PAVEMENT. SHOW | | | HOW THESE AREAS WILL BE SEPARATED IF A LANDSCAPE STRIP | | | IS NOT PROVIDED. | | | | | | THE LANDSCAPE STRIP HAS BEEN PROVIDED BUT STOPS SHORT | | | OF THE FULL LENGTH OF THE LOADING AREA. STAFF WOULD | | | LIKE TO SEE PAVED AREA MINIMIZED. | | | | | | | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. SHOW THE PARKING LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED | | | TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) FOR | | | THE AREAS WITHIN THE PARKING FIELD, AND MATCH THE TOTAL | | | SHOWN ON THE REQUIREMENT CHART TO MEETING THE TOTAL OF | | | BOTH SECTIONS ADDED TOGETHER. | | | PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT IDENTIFYING THE PARKING SPACES, | | | OTHER VEHICULAR USE AREAS AND SHOWING THE AREAS COUNTED | | | TOWARD INTERIOR LANDSCAPING. SEE FIGURE XIV-1 IN | | | SECTION 94-443 TO IDENTIFY AREAS. | | | PROVIDE A SEPARATE EXHIBIT SHOWING THE AREAS AND SQUARE | | | FOOTAGES. | | | | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. UTILITY VALVES AND STRUCTURES INCLUDING | | | SIGNS MAY NOT BE PLACED IN THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREA | | | IN PARKING LOT ISLANDS. THIS AREA IS MEANT TO SUPPORT | | | THE REQUIRED TREE. ISLANDS SHOULD BE EXPANDED TO | | | PROVIDE SEPARATE AREAS FOR THE UTILITIES. | | | | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. SHOW THE REQUIRED TREE IN THE TERMINAL | | | ISLAND AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE BUILDING AND IN | | | THE TERMINAL ISLAND ADJACENT TO THE SIGN. | | | | | | 14. SATISFIED. SHOW THAT THE REQUIRED PARKING LOT TREES | | | MEET THE 75% CATEGORY ONE SHADE TREE REQUIREMENT. | | | REQUIRED TREES INCLUDE ALL TERMINAL ISLAND AND INTERIOR | | | ISLANDS ADJACENT TO PARKING SPACES. | | | | | | 15. SATISFIED. ALL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS MUST MEET THE | | | REQUIRED LANDSCAPE WIDTH OF 8 FEET INSIDE D CURB AND BE | | | THE FULL LENGTH OF THE PARKING SPACE INCLUDING THE 6 | | | INCH D CURB. | | | | | | MUST EXTEND THE FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING | | | SPACE. | | | | | | 16. SATISFIED. ALL PARKING SPACES MUST CONTAIN A WHEEL | | | STOP OR CURB. STAFF SUGGESTS A CURB AT 16 FEET LENGTH | | | WITH OVERHANG TO INCREASE THE PERVIOUS AREA. | | | | | | 17. SATISFIED. ALL CURBS ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPE AREAS | | | MUST MEET THE CODE REQUIREMENT OF A TYPE D NON | | | MOUNTABLE CURB PER SECTION 94-443(C)(5) OR SIMILAR. | | | | | | MODIFIED F CURB DETAIL SHOWN MUST BE PROVEN TO BE OF | | | COMPARABLE DURABILITY TO D CURB PER SECTION | | | 94-443(C)(5)A. THE D CURB IS NON-MOUNTABLE TO STOP CARS | | | FROM READILY DRIVING OVER IT. IT ALSO EXTENDS 6 INCHES | | | ABOVE AND 12 INCHES BELOW THE PAVEMENT LEVEL TO PROVIDE | | | STRENGTH AND DURABILITY. THE TOTAL 18 INCH PROFILE ALSO | | | ACTS AS A ROOT BARRIER TO DIRECT TREE ROOTS DOWN AND | | | MINIMIZE MAINTENANCE. | | | | | | 18. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE BUFFER CALCULATIONS TO ROUND | | | UP FOR ANY PORTIONS OVER THE REQUIRED ONE TREE PER 30 | | | FOOT REQUIREMENT. | | | | | | 19. SATISFIED. EXPLAIN THE LARGE GAP BETWEEN BUFFER | | | TREES ON THE 45TH STREET SIDE. | | | | | | 20. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE BUILDING | | | PERIMETER LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT OF 30% FOR COMMERCIAL | | | USE AND INCLUDE THE LINEAR FOOTAGE. CLARIFY WHERE THE | | | 93 FEET CLAIMED CAN BE FOUND, AS ABOVE GROUND PLANTERS | | | CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD PERIMETER LANDSCAPE | | | REQUIREMENTS. AREAS MUST BE IN THE GROUND. | | | | | | PROVIDE MEASUREMENTS OF THE LINEAR SEGMENTS ADJACENT TO | | | BUILDING FOUNDATION. STAFF COULD ONLY VERIFY 81 FEET | | | THROUGH SCALE MEASUREMENT. | | | | | | 21. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | LANDSCAPE CHART TO REFLECT CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENT OF | | | 50 POINTS USING THE DESIGN OPTIONS CONSISTENT WITH | | | CURRENT CODE 94-442(G). THE SAME PLANTS CANNOT BE | | | COUNTED MORE THAN ONCE IN THE SAME CATEGORY FOR NATIVE | | | AND DROUGHT TOLERANT. | | | | | | POINTS FOR EACH CATEGORY ARE NOT THE CURRENT CODE. | | | DOUBLE CHECK ALL WORDING AND POINTS ALLOTTED, AS THERE | | | ARE DISCREPANCIES. | | | | | | 22. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. | | | PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT | | | MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. SHOW ACTUAL PERCENTAGE ON LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN. INFORMATION INCLUDED IN LANDSCAPE DATA CHART IS | | | NOT CONSISTENT WITH WPB CODE. | | | 23. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL FPL | | | TRANSFORMERS AND ABOVE GROUND UTILITY VALVES AND | | | BACKFLOWS PREVENTERS AND SHOW ALL LOCATIONS OF GROUND | | | MOUNTED EQUIPMENT. | | | 24. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN TO PREVENT CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/11/20: | | | 25. DESIGN GUIDELINES. | | | ? SATISFIED. 6. LANDSCAPING. STAFF WILL NOT SUPPORT ANY | | | REDUCTION IN THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED BUFFER TREES. THE | | | CODE ALLOWS CLUSTERING OF TREES TO ADJUST FOR ANY | | | CIRCUMSTANCES THAT WOULD INHIBIT PLACEMENT. THERE IS | | | ALSO FLEXIBILITY THAT ALLOWS PLACEMENT OF BUFFER TREES | | | ADJACENT INTERIOR TO THE 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER IF | | | SPACE IS AVAILABLE. | | | STAFF WILL NOT SUPPORT THIS LANGUAGE BEING INCLUDED IN | | | THE DESIGN GUIDELINES, AND IT WOULD REQUIRE A WAIVER | | | REQUEST BE INCLUDED IN THE CPD REZONING. | | | ? SATISFIED. FOUNDATION PLANTING. THE CODE REQUIREMENT | | | FOR COMMERCIAL STRUCTURES IS 30 PERCENT, AND STAFF | | | WOULD SUPPORT THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT. ALL REQUIRED | | | FOUNDATION PLANTING WOULD HAVE TO BE WITHIN 10 FEET OF | | | THE FOUNDATION TO MEET THE INTENT, AND ALLOW FOR | | | VARIATIONS SUCH AS SIDEWALK ACCESS. | | | ? SATISFIED. AS MENTIONED IN COMMENT #1, IT MUST BE | | | ESTABLISHED WHEN THE CPD BUFFER SECTIONS WILL BE | | | REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED. WILL IT BE AHEAD OF INTERNAL | | | DEVELOPMENT OR AS EACH AFFECTED AREA COMES IN FOR | | | APPROVAL? | | | STAFF SUGGESTS INSTALLATION OF THE BUFFERS ALONG | | | MILITARY TRAIL AND 45TH STREET WITH THE WAWA | | | CONSTRUCTION TO IMPROVE THE APPEARANCE OF THE OVERALL | | | PROPERTY, AND THE INSTALLATION OF THE REMAINING | | | PERIMETER BUFFERS AS EACH ADJACENT AREA IS DEVELOPED. | | | 26. SATISFIED. WAWA LANDSCAPE PLAN- HIGH RISE LIVE OAKS | | | ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE IN THIS APPLICATION. PROVIDE | | | CATHEDRAL OR SPECIES LIVE OAK FOR MEETING THE 25 FOOT | | | TREE CANOPY REQUIREMENT OF THE CODE FOR SHADE TREE. | | | | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/23/20: | | | WAWA: | | | 27. SATISFIED. SHEET L-1- CORRECT ITEM 3D. ON THE | | | FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN OPTIONS TO 10 POINTS. | | | | | | 28. SATISFIED. EXHIBIT PLAN PROVIDED ON SHEET L-2 DOES | | | NOT HAVE THE AREAS REPRESENTED CORRECTLY. ONLY 3 AREAS | | | NEED TO BE IDENTIFIED AND SQUARE FOOTAGE SHOWN: THE | | | PARKING SPACES, OTHER VEHICULAR USE AREAS AND THE AREAS | | | COUNTED TOWARD INTERIOR LANDSCAPING. | | | 29. SATISFIED. THERE ARE INCONSISTENCIES WITH THE | | | CIVIL, SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLAN WITH SOME UTILITY | | | LOCATIONS. THESE NEED TO BE CONSISTENT. A CONDITION MAY | | | BE INCLUDED TO ASSURE THAT ALL WATER AND SEWER PLAN | | | CHANGES REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY RIVIERA BEACH PROVIDER | | | MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PLANNING STAFF TO | | | ASSURE THE CHANGES MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 11/23/20: | | | | | | 30. SATISFIED. TREE DISPOSITION PLAN: CALCULATIONS FOR | | | TREE CANOPY SIZE 20 FEET OR MORE NEED TO BE CORRECTED | | | FOR THE AREA AS: RADIUS TIMES RADIUS TIMES PI. THIS | | | WILL CHANGE THE MITIGATION REQUIRED CALCULATIONS. | | | 31. SATISFIED. SHEET LP-4 NEEDS TO HAVE THE MEDJOOL | | | TOTAL CANOPY PROVIDED CORRECTED TO 200 (4X50). | | | 32. SATISFIED. WAWA SITE PLAN SHOWS A CHARGING STATION, | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT. | | | | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-23-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
10-23-2020 |
Time |
16:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
10-23-2020 |
Time |
16:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-10-23 16:02:41 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: PRIME DEVELOPMENT CPD AND WAWA Z20040014 | | | OCTOBER 23, 2020 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THE SURVEY, SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOW | | | INCONSISTENCIES WITH THE OVERALL LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS | | | . THESE NEED TO BE CORRECTED TO DO AN ACCURATE AND | | | COMPLETE LANDSCAPE REVIEW. SITE CALCULATIONS MUST BE | | | BASED ON THE TOTAL LOT PER SECTION 94-442, AND DESIGN | | | GUIDELINES MUST DEFINE HOW EACH SITE PLAN WILL MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENTS AND HOW THE OVERALL REQUIREMENTS WILL BE | | | ADDRESSED AS EACH SITE PLAN IS SUBMITTED. | | | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLANT LIST WITH SPECIES AND | | | SIZES FOR THE LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. | | | | | | ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE SEGMENT MEASUREMENT | | | AND REQUIRED TREES INCLUDING PORTIONS OF THE 30 FOOT | | | CALCULATION (ROUND UP) FOR ALL BUFFER SEGMENTS. SHOW | | | PROVIDED NUMBER FOR EACH SEGMENT. | | | INCLUDE PORTIONS IN REQUIRED, ROUND UP FOR PARTIAL | | | TREES. | | | | | | ? SEE COMMENT #25. DESIGN GUIDELINES DO NOT ADDRESS HOW | | | THE CALCULATION OF REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH AREA WILL BE | | | HANDLED. DEFINE WHEN THE BUFFER SEGMENTS WILL BE | | | INSTALLED THAT ARE INCLUDED IN EACH AFFECTED AREA. | | | | | | 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN | | | BASED ON THE TREE SURVEY AND SHOW ALL EXISTING TREES TO | | | BE PRESERVED, RELOCATED OR REMOVED. SOME TREES HAVE | | | BEEN REMOVED FROM AREAS OF THE SITE WITHOUT A PERMIT. | | | THIS NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED. | | | ? SATISFIED. IDENTIFY TREES ALREADY REMOVED AS SUCH ON | | | THE CHART. | | | ? NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TREE CANOPY DIAMETER FOR | | | ALL TREES. | | | ADD A COLUMN PROVIDING THE CANOPY DIAMETER. | | | ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CATEGORY SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE FOR TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET IN DIAMETER AND | | | PALMS FOR ANY REMOVALS FOR MITIGATION DUE. | | | CORRECT BASED ON CANOPY DIAMETER. | | | ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE FOR ANY TREES 20 FEET OR MORE IN CANOPY | | | DIAMETER. | | | CANNOT VERIFY WITHOUT CANOPY DIAMETER. | | | ? SATISFIED. INDIVIDUAL IDENTIFYING NUMBERS ON THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN ARE VERY DIFFICULT TO READ. REVISE TO | | | MAKE THEM CLEAR. | | | ? SATISFIED. IDENTIFY WHETHER FICUS BENJAMINAS ARE PART | | | OF AN UNMAINTAINED HEDGE, OR ARE INDIVIDUAL TREES. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL TREE CANOPY SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE PROVIDED WITH THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN ON | | | THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN, AS WELL AS THE TOTAL | | | PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED. | | | SHOW TOTAL PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL AND CALCULATE CANOPY | | | CREDITS FOR TREES BEING ADDED FOR THE PROPOSED AFFECTED | | | AREA. DEFINE WHEN THE TREES WILL BE REMOVED AND WHEN | | | MITIGATION WILL BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE | | | TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR | | | RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY | | | EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR | | | POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE CONDITION FOR ALL EXISTING | | | TREES AND PALMS AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE | | | TREES AND PALMS. | | | | | | PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS REPORT ON THE CONDITION AND REASON | | | THAT THE TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED CANNOT BE | | | RELOCATED. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. THERE ARE EXISTING LIVE OAK TREES IN THE | | | NORTH BUFFER AND ADJACENT TO THE CELL TOWER COMPOUND. | | | THESE ARE BASED ON AN APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT | | | MEETS THE SCREENING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE TOWER AND | | | EQUIPMENT. ANY CHANGES PROPOSED TO THE APPROVED | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN NEED TO BE SHOWN AND INCLUDED ON THE | | | MASTER PLAN. | | | | | | EXPLAIN THE REASON FOR REMOVAL OF LIVE OAK TREE QV-13. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. THE PROPERTY LINE CHANGE FOR RIGHT OF WAY | | | DEDICATION NEEDS TO BE FINALIZED TO DETERMINE THE | | | LOCATION OF OVERHEAD POWER LINES, AS THIS WILL DIRECTLY | | | AFFECT THE RIGHT TREE RIGHT PLACE CONDITIONS AND | | | LOCATIONS FOR THE LANDSCAPE BUFFERS. UNDERGROUNDING OF | | | POWER LINES THAT WILL BE RELOCATED NEEDS TO BE | | | ADDRESSED. | | | 7. SATISFIED. LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS AND | | | LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND LINES MUST BE SHOWN, AS THE | | | TRANSFORMERS MUST BE SCREENED, AND LOCATIONS CANNOT | | | DISPLACE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING. THIS SHOULD ALSO BE | | | ADDRESSED IN THE DESIGN GUIDELINES. | | | 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | LANDSCAPE CHART TO REFLECT CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENT OF | | | 50 POINTS USING THE DESIGN OPTIONS CONSISTENT WITH | | | CURRENT CODE 94-442(G). | | | | | | WAWA LANDSCAPE PLAN: | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. ALL REFERENCES TO LOT NEED TO BE CHANGED | | | TO AFFECTED SITE PLAN AREA OR SIMILAR, AS THE APPLICANT | | | HAS INDICATED THIS WILL NOT BE SUBDIVIDED INTO A | | | SEPARATE LOT. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. THERE IS NO WAY OF TELLING THE PARKING | | | AND LOADING AREAS ADJACENT TO THE INTERNAL ROAD, | | | RESULTING IN LARGE CONTINUOUS AREAS OF PAVEMENT. SHOW | | | HOW THESE AREAS WILL BE SEPARATED IF A LANDSCAPE STRIP | | | IS NOT PROVIDED. | | | | | | THE LANDSCAPE STRIP HAS BEEN PROVIDED BUT STOPS SHORT | | | OF THE FULL LENGTH OF THE LOADING AREA. STAFF WOULD | | | LIKE TO SEE PAVED AREA MINIMIZED. | | | | | | | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. SHOW THE PARKING LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED | | | TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) FOR | | | THE AREAS WITHIN THE PARKING FIELD, AND MATCH THE TOTAL | | | SHOWN ON THE REQUIREMENT CHART TO MEETING THE TOTAL OF | | | BOTH SECTIONS ADDED TOGETHER. | | | PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT IDENTIFYING THE PARKING SPACES, | | | OTHER VEHICULAR USE AREAS AND SHOWING THE AREAS COUNTED | | | TOWARD INTERIOR LANDSCAPING. SEE FIGURE XIV-1 IN | | | SECTION 94-443 TO IDENTIFY AREAS. | | | PROVIDE A SEPARATE EXHIBIT SHOWING THE AREAS AND SQUARE | | | FOOTAGES. | | | | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. UTILITY VALVES AND STRUCTURES INCLUDING | | | SIGNS MAY NOT BE PLACED IN THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREA | | | IN PARKING LOT ISLANDS. THIS AREA IS MEANT TO SUPPORT | | | THE REQUIRED TREE. ISLANDS SHOULD BE EXPANDED TO | | | PROVIDE SEPARATE AREAS FOR THE UTILITIES. | | | | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. SHOW THE REQUIRED TREE IN THE TERMINAL | | | ISLAND AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE BUILDING AND IN | | | THE TERMINAL ISLAND ADJACENT TO THE SIGN. | | | | | | 14. SATISFIED. SHOW THAT THE REQUIRED PARKING LOT TREES | | | MEET THE 75% CATEGORY ONE SHADE TREE REQUIREMENT. | | | REQUIRED TREES INCLUDE ALL TERMINAL ISLAND AND INTERIOR | | | ISLANDS ADJACENT TO PARKING SPACES. | | | | | | 15. SATISFIED. ALL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS MUST MEET THE | | | REQUIRED LANDSCAPE WIDTH OF 8 FEET INSIDE D CURB AND BE | | | THE FULL LENGTH OF THE PARKING SPACE INCLUDING THE 6 | | | INCH D CURB. | | | | | | MUST EXTEND THE FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING | | | SPACE. | | | | | | 16. SATISFIED. ALL PARKING SPACES MUST CONTAIN A WHEEL | | | STOP OR CURB. STAFF SUGGESTS A CURB AT 16 FEET LENGTH | | | WITH OVERHANG TO INCREASE THE PERVIOUS AREA. | | | | | | 17. SATISFIED. ALL CURBS ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPE AREAS | | | MUST MEET THE CODE REQUIREMENT OF A TYPE D NON | | | MOUNTABLE CURB PER SECTION 94-443(C)(5) OR SIMILAR. | | | | | | MODIFIED F CURB DETAIL SHOWN MUST BE PROVEN TO BE OF | | | COMPARABLE DURABILITY TO D CURB PER SECTION | | | 94-443(C)(5)A. THE D CURB IS NON-MOUNTABLE TO STOP CARS | | | FROM READILY DRIVING OVER IT. IT ALSO EXTENDS 6 INCHES | | | ABOVE AND 12 INCHES BELOW THE PAVEMENT LEVEL TO PROVIDE | | | STRENGTH AND DURABILITY. THE TOTAL 18 INCH PROFILE ALSO | | | ACTS AS A ROOT BARRIER TO DIRECT TREE ROOTS DOWN AND | | | MINIMIZE MAINTENANCE. | | | | | | 18. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE BUFFER CALCULATIONS TO ROUND | | | UP FOR ANY PORTIONS OVER THE REQUIRED ONE TREE PER 30 | | | FOOT REQUIREMENT. | | | | | | 19. SATISFIED. EXPLAIN THE LARGE GAP BETWEEN BUFFER | | | TREES ON THE 45TH STREET SIDE. | | | | | | 20. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE BUILDING | | | PERIMETER LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT OF 30% FOR COMMERCIAL | | | USE AND INCLUDE THE LINEAR FOOTAGE. CLARIFY WHERE THE | | | 93 FEET CLAIMED CAN BE FOUND, AS ABOVE GROUND PLANTERS | | | CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD PERIMETER LANDSCAPE | | | REQUIREMENTS. AREAS MUST BE IN THE GROUND. | | | | | | PROVIDE MEASUREMENTS OF THE LINEAR SEGMENTS ADJACENT TO | | | BUILDING FOUNDATION. STAFF COULD ONLY VERIFY 81 FEET | | | THROUGH SCALE MEASUREMENT. | | | | | | 21. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | LANDSCAPE CHART TO REFLECT CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENT OF | | | 50 POINTS USING THE DESIGN OPTIONS CONSISTENT WITH | | | CURRENT CODE 94-442(G). THE SAME PLANTS CANNOT BE | | | COUNTED MORE THAN ONCE IN THE SAME CATEGORY FOR NATIVE | | | AND DROUGHT TOLERANT. | | | | | | POINTS FOR EACH CATEGORY ARE NOT THE CURRENT CODE. | | | DOUBLE CHECK ALL WORDING AND POINTS ALLOTTED, AS THERE | | | ARE DISCREPANCIES. | | | | | | 22. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. | | | PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT | | | MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. SHOW ACTUAL PERCENTAGE ON LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN. INFORMATION INCLUDED IN LANDSCAPE DATA CHART IS | | | NOT CONSISTENT WITH WPB CODE. | | | 23. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL FPL | | | TRANSFORMERS AND ABOVE GROUND UTILITY VALVES AND | | | BACKFLOWS PREVENTERS AND SHOW ALL LOCATIONS OF GROUND | | | MOUNTED EQUIPMENT. | | | 24. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN TO PREVENT CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/11/20: | | | 25. DESIGN GUIDELINES. | | | ? NOT SATISFIED. 6. LANDSCAPING. STAFF WILL NOT SUPPORT | | | ANY REDUCTION IN THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED BUFFER TREES. | | | THE CODE ALLOWS CLUSTERING OF TREES TO ADJUST FOR ANY | | | CIRCUMSTANCES THAT WOULD INHIBIT PLACEMENT. THERE IS | | | ALSO FLEXIBILITY THAT ALLOWS PLACEMENT OF BUFFER TREES | | | ADJACENT INTERIOR TO THE 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER IF | | | SPACE IS AVAILABLE. | | | STAFF WILL NOT SUPPORT THIS LANGUAGE BEING INCLUDED IN | | | THE DESIGN GUIDELINES, AND IT WOULD REQUIRE A WAIVER | | | REQUEST BE INCLUDED IN THE CPD REZONING. | | | ? SATISFIED. FOUNDATION PLANTING. THE CODE REQUIREMENT | | | FOR COMMERCIAL STRUCTURES IS 30 PERCENT, AND STAFF | | | WOULD SUPPORT THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT. ALL REQUIRED | | | FOUNDATION PLANTING WOULD HAVE TO BE WITHIN 10 FEET OF | | | THE FOUNDATION TO MEET THE INTENT, AND ALLOW FOR | | | VARIATIONS SUCH AS SIDEWALK ACCESS. | | | ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. AS MENTIONED IN COMMENT #1, IT | | | MUST BE ESTABLISHED WHEN THE CPD BUFFER SECTIONS WILL | | | BE REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED. WILL IT BE AHEAD OF INTERNAL | | | DEVELOPMENT OR AS EACH AFFECTED AREA COMES IN FOR | | | APPROVAL? | | | STAFF SUGGESTS INSTALLATION OF THE BUFFERS ALONG | | | MILITARY TRAIL AND 45TH STREET WITH THE WAWA | | | CONSTRUCTION TO IMPROVE THE APPEARANCE OF THE OVERALL | | | PROPERTY, AND THE INSTALLATION OF THE REMAINING | | | PERIMETER BUFFERS AS EACH ADJACENT AREA IS DEVELOPED. | | | 26. SATISFIED. WAWA LANDSCAPE PLAN- HIGH RISE LIVE OAKS | | | ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE IN THIS APPLICATION. PROVIDE | | | CATHEDRAL OR SPECIES LIVE OAK FOR MEETING THE 25 FOOT | | | TREE CANOPY REQUIREMENT OF THE CODE FOR SHADE TREE. | | | | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/23/20: | | | WAWA: | | | 27. SHEET L-1- CORRECT ITEM 3D. ON THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | DESIGN OPTIONS TO 10 POINTS. | | | | | | 28. EXHIBIT PLAN PROVIDED ON SHEET L-2 DOES NOT HAVE | | | THE AREAS REPRESENTED CORRECTLY. ONLY 3 AREAS NEED TO | | | BE IDENTIFIED AND SQUARE FOOTAGE SHOWN: THE PARKING | | | SPACES, OTHER VEHICULAR USE AREAS AND THE AREAS COUNTED | | | TOWARD INTERIOR LANDSCAPING. | | | 29. THERE ARE INCONSISTENCIES WITH THE CIVIL, SITE AND | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN WITH SOME UTILITY LOCATIONS. THESE NEED | | | TO BE CONSISTENT. A CONDITION MAY BE INCLUDED TO ASSURE | | | THAT ALL WATER AND SEWER PLAN CHANGES REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED BY RIVIERA BEACH PROVIDER MUST BE REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED BY PLANNING STAFF TO ASSURE THE CHANGES MEET | | | CODE REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-11-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
08-11-2020 |
Time |
17:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
08-11-2020 |
Time |
17:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-08-11 17:06:46 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: PRIME DEVELOPMENT CPD AND WAWA Z20040014 | | | AUGUST 11, 2020 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE SURVEY, SITE PLAN AND | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOW INCONSISTENCIES WITH THE OVERALL | | | LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS . THESE NEED TO BE CORRECTED TO | | | DO AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE LANDSCAPE REVIEW. SITE | | | CALCULATIONS MUST BE BASED ON THE TOTAL LOT PER SECTION | | | 94-442, AND DESIGN GUIDELINES MUST DEFINE HOW EACH SITE | | | PLAN WILL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS AND HOW THE OVERALL | | | REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ADDRESSED AS EACH SITE PLAN IS | | | SUBMITTED. | | | ? PROVIDE A PLANT LIST WITH SPECIES AND SIZES FOR THE | | | LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. | | | ? PROVIDE THE SEGMENT MEASUREMENT AND REQUIRED TREES | | | INCLUDING PORTIONS OF THE 30 FOOT CALCULATION (ROUND | | | UP) FOR ALL BUFFER SEGMENTS. SHOW PROVIDED NUMBER FOR | | | EACH SEGMENT. | | | ? DESIGN GUIDELINES DO NOT ADDRESS HOW THE CALCULATION | | | OF REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH AREA WILL BE HANDLED. DEFINE | | | WHEN THE BUFFER SEGMENTS WILL BE INSTALLED THAT ARE | | | INCLUDED IN EACH AFFECTED AREA. | | | | | | 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN | | | BASED ON THE TREE SURVEY AND SHOW ALL EXISTING TREES TO | | | BE PRESERVED, RELOCATED OR REMOVED. SOME TREES HAVE | | | BEEN REMOVED FROM AREAS OF THE SITE WITHOUT A PERMIT. | | | THIS NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED. | | | ? IDENTIFY TREES ALREADY REMOVED AS SUCH ON THE CHART. | | | ? PROVIDE THE TREE CANOPY DIAMETER FOR ALL TREES. | | | ? PROVIDE THE CATEGORY SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR TREES LESS | | | THAN 20 FEET IN DIAMETER AND PALMS FOR ANY REMOVALS FOR | | | MITIGATION DUE. | | | ? PROVIDE THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR ANY TREES 20 | | | FEET OR MORE IN CANOPY DIAMETER. | | | ? INDIVIDUAL IDENTIFYING NUMBERS ON THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN ARE VERY DIFFICULT TO READ. REVISE TO | | | MAKE THEM CLEAR. | | | ? IDENTIFY WHETHER FICUS BENJAMINAS ARE PART OF AN | | | UNMAINTAINED HEDGE, OR ARE INDIVIDUAL TREES. | | | | | | 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL TREE CANOPY | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED WITH THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN ON THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN, AS WELL AS THE TOTAL | | | PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED. | | | SHOW TOTAL PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL AND CALCULATE CANOPY | | | CREDITS FOR TREES BEING ADDED FOR THE PROPOSED AFFECTED | | | AREA. DEFINE WHEN THE TREES WILL BE REMOVED AND WHEN | | | MITIGATION WILL BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES | | | NATIVE TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE | | | OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY | | | EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR | | | POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE CONDITION FOR ALL EXISTING | | | TREES AND PALMS AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE | | | TREES AND PALMS. | | | | | | PROVIDE AN ARBORISTS REPORT ON THE CONDITION AND REASON | | | THAT THE TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED CANNOT BE | | | RELOCATED. | | | | | | 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THERE ARE EXISTING LIVE OAK | | | TREES IN THE NORTH BUFFER AND ADJACENT TO THE CELL | | | TOWER COMPOUND. THESE ARE BASED ON AN APPROVED | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT MEETS THE SCREENING REQUIREMENTS | | | FOR THE TOWER AND EQUIPMENT. ANY CHANGES PROPOSED TO | | | THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN NEED TO BE SHOWN AND | | | INCLUDED ON THE MASTER PLAN. | | | | | | EXPLAIN THE REASON FOR REMOVAL OF LIVE OAK TREE QV-13. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. THE PROPERTY LINE CHANGE FOR RIGHT OF WAY | | | DEDICATION NEEDS TO BE FINALIZED TO DETERMINE THE | | | LOCATION OF OVERHEAD POWER LINES, AS THIS WILL DIRECTLY | | | AFFECT THE RIGHT TREE RIGHT PLACE CONDITIONS AND | | | LOCATIONS FOR THE LANDSCAPE BUFFERS. UNDERGROUNDING OF | | | POWER LINES THAT WILL BE RELOCATED NEEDS TO BE | | | ADDRESSED. | | | 7. SATISFIED. LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS AND | | | LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND LINES MUST BE SHOWN, AS THE | | | TRANSFORMERS MUST BE SCREENED, AND LOCATIONS CANNOT | | | DISPLACE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING. THIS SHOULD ALSO BE | | | ADDRESSED IN THE DESIGN GUIDELINES. | | | 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | LANDSCAPE CHART TO REFLECT CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENT OF | | | 50 POINTS USING THE DESIGN OPTIONS CONSISTENT WITH | | | CURRENT CODE 94-442(G). | | | | | | WAWA LANDSCAPE PLAN: | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. ALL REFERENCES TO LOT NEED TO BE CHANGED | | | TO AFFECTED SITE PLAN AREA OR SIMILAR, AS THE APPLICANT | | | HAS INDICATED THIS WILL NOT BE SUBDIVIDED INTO A | | | SEPARATE LOT. | | | | | | 10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THERE IS NO WAY OF TELLING THE | | | PARKING AND LOADING AREAS ADJACENT TO THE INTERNAL | | | ROAD, RESULTING IN LARGE CONTINUOUS AREAS OF PAVEMENT. | | | SHOW HOW THESE AREAS WILL BE SEPARATED IF A LANDSCAPE | | | STRIP IS NOT PROVIDED. | | | | | | THE LANDSCAPE STRIP HAS BEEN PROVIDED BUT STOPS SHORT | | | OF THE FULL LENGTH OF THE LOADING AREA. STAFF WOULD | | | LIKE TO SEE PAVED AREA MINIMIZED. | | | | | | | | | | | | 11. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW THE PARKING LANDSCAPE | | | AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION | | | 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) FOR THE AREAS WITHIN THE PARKING | | | FIELD, AND MATCH THE TOTAL SHOWN ON THE REQUIREMENT | | | CHART TO MEETING THE TOTAL OF BOTH SECTIONS ADDED | | | TOGETHER. | | | PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT IDENTIFYING THE PARKING SPACES, | | | OTHER VEHICULAR USE AREAS AND SHOWING THE AREAS COUNTED | | | TOWARD INTERIOR LANDSCAPING. SEE FIGURE XIV-1 IN | | | SECTION 94-443 TO IDENTIFY AREAS. | | | PROVIDE A SEPARATE EXHIBIT SHOWING THE AREAS AND SQUARE | | | FOOTAGES. | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. UTILITY VALVES AND STRUCTURES INCLUDING | | | SIGNS MAY NOT BE PLACED IN THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREA | | | IN PARKING LOT ISLANDS. THIS AREA IS MEANT TO SUPPORT | | | THE REQUIRED TREE. ISLANDS SHOULD BE EXPANDED TO | | | PROVIDE SEPARATE AREAS FOR THE UTILITIES. | | | | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. SHOW THE REQUIRED TREE IN THE TERMINAL | | | ISLAND AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE BUILDING AND IN | | | THE TERMINAL ISLAND ADJACENT TO THE SIGN. | | | | | | 14. SATISFIED. SHOW THAT THE REQUIRED PARKING LOT TREES | | | MEET THE 75% CATEGORY ONE SHADE TREE REQUIREMENT. | | | REQUIRED TREES INCLUDE ALL TERMINAL ISLAND AND INTERIOR | | | ISLANDS ADJACENT TO PARKING SPACES. | | | | | | 15. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ALL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS MUST | | | MEET THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE WIDTH OF 8 FEET INSIDE D | | | CURB AND BE THE FULL LENGTH OF THE PARKING SPACE | | | INCLUDING THE 6 INCH D CURB. | | | | | | MUST EXTEND THE FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING | | | SPACE. | | | | | | 16. SATISFIED. ALL PARKING SPACES MUST CONTAIN A WHEEL | | | STOP OR CURB. STAFF SUGGESTS A CURB AT 16 FEET LENGTH | | | WITH OVERHANG TO INCREASE THE PERVIOUS AREA. | | | | | | 17. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ALL CURBS ADJACENT TO | | | LANDSCAPE AREAS MUST MEET THE CODE REQUIREMENT OF A | | | TYPE D NON MOUNTABLE CURB PER SECTION 94-443(C)(5) OR | | | SIMILAR. | | | | | | MODIFIED F CURB DETAIL SHOWN MUST BE PROVEN TO BE OF | | | COMPARABLE DURABILITY TO D CURB PER SECTION | | | 94-443(C)(5)A. THE D CURB IS NON-MOUNTABLE TO STOP CARS | | | FROM READILY DRIVING OVER IT. IT ALSO EXTENDS 6 INCHES | | | ABOVE AND 12 INCHES BELOW THE PAVEMENT LEVEL TO PROVIDE | | | STRENGTH AND DURABILITY. THE TOTAL 18 INCH PROFILE ALSO | | | ACTS AS A ROOT BARRIER TO DIRECT TREE ROOTS DOWN AND | | | MINIMIZE MAINTENANCE. | | | | | | 18. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE BUFFER CALCULATIONS TO ROUND | | | UP FOR ANY PORTIONS OVER THE REQUIRED ONE TREE PER 30 | | | FOOT REQUIREMENT. | | | | | | 19. SATISFIED. EXPLAIN THE LARGE GAP BETWEEN BUFFER | | | TREES ON THE 45TH STREET SIDE. | | | | | | 20. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | | BUILDING PERIMETER LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT OF 30% FOR | | | COMMERCIAL USE AND INCLUDE THE LINEAR FOOTAGE. CLARIFY | | | WHERE THE 93 FEET CLAIMED CAN BE FOUND, AS ABOVE GROUND | | | PLANTERS CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD PERIMETER LANDSCAPE | | | REQUIREMENTS. AREAS MUST BE IN THE GROUND. | | | | | | PROVIDE MEASUREMENTS OF THE LINEAR SEGMENTS ADJACENT TO | | | BUILDING FOUNDATION. STAFF COULD ONLY VERIFY 81 FEET | | | THROUGH SCALE MEASUREMENT. | | | | | | 21. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE FLORIDA | | | FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE CHART TO REFLECT CURRENT CODE | | | REQUIREMENT OF 50 POINTS USING THE DESIGN OPTIONS | | | CONSISTENT WITH CURRENT CODE 94-442(G). THE SAME PLANTS | | | CANNOT BE COUNTED MORE THAN ONCE IN THE SAME CATEGORY | | | FOR NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT. | | | | | | POINTS FOR EACH CATEGORY ARE NOT THE CURRENT CODE. | | | DOUBLE CHECK ALL WORDING AND POINTS ALLOTTED, AS THERE | | | ARE DISCREPANCIES. | | | | | | 22. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. | | | PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT | | | MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. SHOW ACTUAL PERCENTAGE ON LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN. INFORMATION INCLUDED IN LANDSCAPE DATA CHART IS | | | NOT CONSISTENT WITH WPB CODE. | | | 23. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL FPL | | | TRANSFORMERS AND ABOVE GROUND UTILITY VALVES AND | | | BACKFLOWS PREVENTERS AND SHOW ALL LOCATIONS OF GROUND | | | MOUNTED EQUIPMENT. | | | 24. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN TO PREVENT CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/11/20: | | | 25. DESIGN GUIDELINES. | | | ? 6. LANDSCAPING. STAFF WILL NOT SUPPORT ANY REDUCTION | | | IN THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED BUFFER TREES. THE CODE ALLOWS | | | CLUSTERING OF TREES TO ADJUST FOR ANY CIRCUMSTANCES | | | THAT WOULD INHIBIT PLACEMENT. THERE IS ALSO FLEXIBILITY | | | THAT ALLOWS PLACEMENT OF BUFFER TREES ADJACENT INTERIOR | | | TO THE 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER IF SPACE IS AVAILABLE. | | | ? FOUNDATION PLANTING. THE CODE REQUIREMENT FOR | | | COMMERCIAL STRUCTURES IS 30 PERCENT, AND STAFF WOULD | | | SUPPORT THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT. ALL REQUIRED | | | FOUNDATION PLANTING WOULD HAVE TO BE WITHIN 10 FEET OF | | | THE FOUNDATION TO MEET THE INTENT, AND ALLOW FOR | | | VARIATIONS SUCH AS SIDEWALK ACCESS. | | | ? AS MENTIONED IN COMMENT #1, IT MUST BE ESTABLISHED | | | WHEN THE CPD BUFFER SECTIONS WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE | | | PLANTED. WILL IT BE AHEAD OF INTERNAL DEVELOPMENT OR AS | | | EACH AFFECTED AREA COMES IN FOR APPROVAL? | | | 26. WAWA LANDSCAPE PLAN- HIGH RISE LIVE OAKS ARE NOT | | | ACCEPTABLE IN THIS APPLICATION. PROVIDE CATHEDRAL OR | | | SPECIES LIVE OAK FOR MEETING THE 25 FOOT TREE CANOPY | | | REQUIREMENT OF THE CODE FOR SHADE TREE. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-13-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
05-13-2020 |
Time |
13:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
05-13-2020 |
Time |
13:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-05-13 13:18:43 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: PRIME DEVELOPMENT CPD AND WAWA Z20040014 | | | MAY 12, 2020 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THE SURVEY, SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOW | | | INCONSISTENCIES WITH THE OVERALL LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS | | | . THESE NEED TO BE CORRECTED TO DO AN ACCURATE AND | | | COMPLETE LANDSCAPE REVIEW. SITE CALCULATIONS MUST BE | | | BASED ON THE TOTAL LOT PER SECTION 94-442, AND DESIGN | | | GUIDELINES MUST DEFINE HOW EACH SITE PLAN WILL MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENTS AND HOW THE OVERALL REQUIREMENTS WILL BE | | | ADDRESSED AS EACH SITE PLAN IS SUBMITTED. | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN BASED ON THE TREE | | | SURVEY AND SHOW ALL EXISTING TREES TO BE PRESERVED, | | | RELOCATED OR REMOVED. SOME TREES HAVE BEEN REMOVED FROM | | | AREAS OF THE SITE WITHOUT A PERMIT. THIS NEEDS TO BE | | | ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE THE TOTAL TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE | | | PROVIDED WITH THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN ON THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN, AS WELL AS THE TOTAL PROPOSED TO BE | | | REMOVED. | | | | | | 4. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES IN GOOD | | | CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A | | | 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY | | | RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION. | | | PROVIDE CONDITION FOR ALL EXISTING TREES AND PALMS AND | | | RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE NATIVE TREES AND PALMS. | | | | | | 5. THERE ARE EXISTING LIVE OAK TREES IN THE NORTH | | | BUFFER AND ADJACENT TO THE CELL TOWER COMPOUND. THESE | | | ARE BASED ON AN APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT MEETS THE | | | SCREENING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE TOWER AND EQUIPMENT. ANY | | | CHANGES PROPOSED TO THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN NEED TO | | | BE SHOWN AND INCLUDED ON THE MASTER PLAN. | | | | | | 6. THE PROPERTY LINE CHANGE FOR RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION | | | NEEDS TO BE FINALIZED TO DETERMINE THE LOCATION OF | | | OVERHEAD POWER LINES, AS THIS WILL DIRECTLY AFFECT THE | | | RIGHT TREE RIGHT PLACE CONDITIONS AND LOCATIONS FOR THE | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFERS. UNDERGROUNDING OF POWER LINES THAT | | | WILL BE RELOCATED NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED. | | | | | | | | | | | | 7. LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS AND LOCATIONS OF | | | UNDERGROUND LINES MUST BE SHOWN, AS THE TRANSFORMERS | | | MUST BE SCREENED, AND LOCATIONS CANNOT DISPLACE | | | REQUIRED LANDSCAPING. THIS SHOULD ALSO BE ADDRESSED IN | | | THE DESIGN GUIDELINES. | | | 8. PLEASE CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE CHART | | | TO REFLECT CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENT OF 50 POINTS USING | | | THE DESIGN OPTIONS CONSISTENT WITH CURRENT CODE | | | 94-442(G). | | | | | | WAWA LANDSCAPE PLAN: | | | | | | 9. ALL REFERENCES TO LOT NEED TO BE CHANGED TO AFFECTED | | | SITE PLAN AREA OR SIMILAR, AS THE APPLICANT HAS | | | INDICATED THIS WILL NOT BE SUBDIVIDED INTO A SEPARATE | | | LOT. | | | | | | 10. THERE IS NO WAY OF TELLING THE PARKING AND LOADING | | | AREAS ADJACENT TO THE INTERNAL ROAD, RESULTING IN LARGE | | | CONTINUOUS AREAS OF PAVEMENT. SHOW HOW THESE AREAS WILL | | | BE SEPARATED IF A LANDSCAPE STRIP IS NOT PROVIDED. | | | | | | 11. SHOW THE PARKING LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD | | | COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) FOR THE | | | AREAS WITHIN THE PARKING FIELD, AND MATCH THE TOTAL | | | SHOWN ON THE REQUIREMENT CHART TO MEETING THE TOTAL OF | | | BOTH SECTIONS ADDED TOGETHER. | | | PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT IDENTIFYING THE PARKING SPACES, | | | OTHER VEHICULAR USE AREAS AND SHOWING THE AREAS COUNTED | | | TOWARD INTERIOR LANDSCAPING. SEE FIGURE XIV-1 IN | | | SECTION 94-443 TO IDENTIFY AREAS. | | | | | | 12. UTILITY VALVES AND STRUCTURES INCLUDING SIGNS MAY | | | NOT BE PLACED IN THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREA IN PARKING | | | LOT ISLANDS. THIS AREA IS MEANT TO SUPPORT THE REQUIRED | | | TREE. ISLANDS SHOULD BE EXPANDED TO PROVIDE SEPARATE | | | AREAS FOR THE UTILITIES. | | | | | | | | | 13. SHOW THE REQUIRED TREE IN THE TERMINAL ISLAND AT | | | THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE BUILDING AND IN THE | | | TERMINAL ISLAND ADJACENT TO THE SIGN. | | | | | | 14. SHOW THAT THE REQUIRED PARKING LOT TREES MEET THE | | | 75% CATEGORY ONE SHADE TREE REQUIREMENT. REQUIRED TREES | | | INCLUDE ALL TERMINAL ISLAND AND INTERIOR ISLANDS | | | ADJACENT TO PARKING SPACES. | | | | | | 15. ALL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS MUST MEET THE REQUIRED | | | LANDSCAPE WIDTH OF 8 FEET INSIDE D CURB AND BE THE FULL | | | LENGTH OF THE PARKING SPACE INCLUDING THE 6 INCH D | | | CURB. | | | | | | 16. ALL PARKING SPACES MUST CONTAIN A WHEEL STOP OR | | | CURB. STAFF SUGGESTS A CURB AT 16 FEET LENGTH WITH | | | OVERHANG TO INCREASE THE PERVIOUS AREA. | | | | | | 17. ALL CURBS ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPE AREAS MUST MEET THE | | | CODE REQUIREMENT OF A TYPE D NON MOUNTABLE CURB PER | | | SECTION 94-443(C)(5) OR SIMILAR. | | | | | | 18. CORRECT THE BUFFER CALCULATIONS TO ROUND UP FOR ANY | | | PORTIONS OVER THE REQUIRED ONE TREE PER 30 FOOT | | | REQUIREMENT. | | | | | | 19. EXPLAIN THE LARGE GAP BETWEEN BUFFER TREES ON THE | | | 45TH STREET SIDE. | | | | | | 20. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE BUILDING PERIMETER | | | LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT OF 30% FOR COMMERCIAL USE AND | | | INCLUDE THE LINEAR FOOTAGE. CLARIFY WHERE THE 93 FEET | | | CLAIMED CAN BE FOUND, AS ABOVE GROUND PLANTERS CANNOT | | | BE COUNTED TOWARD PERIMETER LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS. | | | AREAS MUST BE IN THE GROUND. | | | | | | 21. PLEASE CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE CHART | | | TO REFLECT CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENT OF 50 POINTS USING | | | THE DESIGN OPTIONS CONSISTENT WITH CURRENT CODE | | | 94-442(G). THE SAME PLANTS CANNOT BE COUNTED MORE THAN | | | ONCE IN THE SAME CATEGORY FOR NATIVE AND DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT. | | | | | | 22. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT | | | SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL | | | ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT | | | SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF | | | SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA | | | WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA | | | LANDSCAPES. SHOW ACTUAL PERCENTAGE ON LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | INFORMATION INCLUDED IN LANDSCAPE DATA CHART IS NOT | | | CONSISTENT WITH WPB CODE. | | | 23. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL FPL TRANSFORMERS | | | AND ABOVE GROUND UTILITY VALVES AND BACKFLOWS | | | PREVENTERS AND SHOW ALL LOCATIONS OF GROUND MOUNTED | | | EQUIPMENT. | | | 24. SHOW LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO | | | PREVENT CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
10-19-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
10-19-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
10-19-2022 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-10-19 14:42:42 | PASSED WITH THE CONDITION BELOW: | | | - THE ENCLOSURE WITH THE ENTRY POINT FACING SOUTH (45TH | | | STREET) SHOULD BE UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION | | | CONTAINERS AND THE ENCLOSURE FACING NORTH, FOR | | | RECYCLING. | | | | | | NO FURTHER COMMENTS FROM DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-13-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
08-13-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
08-13-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-08-13 11:45:03 | PLEASE PROVIDE: | | | | | | 1- REVISED ENCLOSURE DETAIL, SHEET SP-3, TO MODIFY THE | | | ENCLOSURES ENTRY POINT TO SW DIRECTION AND AVOID THE | | | LOADING ZONE. (REFERENCE: CORRESPONDENCE SENT TO TROY | | | HOLLAWAY ON 6/4/20) | | | 2- REVISED AUTO TURN FOR SANITATION COLLECTION TRUCK | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-11-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
05-11-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
05-11-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-05-11 12:22:51 | | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS: | | | | | | 1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID | | | WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE AND TYPE OF | | | THE CONTAINER THAT WILL BE UTILIZED THAT WILL BE | | | UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE. | | | | | | 2- DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL. FOR A FREESTANDING SITE | | | DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, THE ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE | | | LATEST REVISION OF CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL | | | CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE STANDARD, CG-7. | | | | | | 3- AUTO TURN FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER | | | TRUCK WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECS: | | | - TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT | | | - TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT | | | - TURNING RADIUS: | | | - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT | | | - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT | | | - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT | | | | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
11-08-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
11-08-2020 |
Time |
09:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
11-08-2020 |
Time |
09:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-04-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
08-04-2020 |
Time |
14:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
08-04-2020 |
Time |
14:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-08-04 14:22:11 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | 7/29/2020 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. | | | | | | 1. [NOT SATISFIED. CAN BE MADE A CONDITION OR APPROVAL | | | FOR THE SITE PLAN] 45TH ST. IS MAINTAINED BY PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY AND MILITARY TRAIL IS MAINTAINED BY FDOT. | | | APPROVALS FROM THESE AGENCIES WILL BE NEEDED BEFORE AN | | | ENGINEERING PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED. | | | | | | 2. [SATISFIED] CHECK WITH PALM BEACH COUNTY WHETHER | | | THEY PREFER THE SIDEWALK ALONG 45TH ST TO BE | | | CONSTRUCTED AT BACK OF CURB OR AT THE FUTURE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE. | | | | | | 2.1 [NEW COMMENT] PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION OF THE RIGHT | | | TURN LANE ON 45TH ST. FROM EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT TO | | | PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY LINE. | | | | | | 3. [SATISFIED - RESPONSE INDICATED OWNER PREFERS FULL | | | DEPTH PARKING STALLS] CONSIDER REDUCING THE PARKING | | | STALL DEPTHS BY TWO FEET AND PROVIDE 2 FEET OF OVERHANG | | | IN ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE WIDTH. | | | | | | 4. [NOT SATISFIED. CAN BE MADE A CONDITION OR APPROVAL | | | FOR THE SITE PLAN] PROVIDE APPROVAL/ACCEPTANCE FROM | | | FPL, FPUC AND ANY OTHER UTILITY WITH INTERESTS IN THE | | | EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF | | | THE SITE WHERE THE DETENTION AREA IS PROPOSED. | | | | | | 4.1 [NEW COMMENT] FOR THE DRY DETENTION AREA, PROVIDE | | | CROSS SECTIONS FROM EAST PROPERTY LINE TO WEST PROPERTY | | | LINE AND FROM NORTH PROPERTY LINE TO 5 FEET SOUTH OF | | | THE DRY DETENTION AREA. | | | | | | 5. [SATISFIED] REMOVE EXISTING DRIVEWAY ACCESS POINTS | | | THAT WILL NOT BE NEEDED AND RESTORE STANDARD SIDEWALK | | | AND CURB AND GUTTER. | | | | | | 6. [NOT SATISFIED] LANDSCAPING PLANS SHOW LANDSCAPING | | | WITHIN THE FUTURE RIGHT OF WAY OF 45TH STREET. | | | . | | | 7. [REQUIRED FOR ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL] DRAINAGE | | | SYSTEM TO MEET SFWMD ERP CRITERIA. | | | | | | 7.1 [NEW COMMENT] PROVIDE CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE PLANS FOR | | | THE FULLY DEVELOPED SITE IN ORDER TO SET MINIMUM | | | ELEVATIONS FOR PERIMETER BERM, FINISHED FLOOR | | | ELEVATION, PARKING LOTS, ETC. AND MAXIMUM PEAK | | | DISCHARGE RATE. INCLUDE LAND USE AND DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS | | | FOR EACH PARCEL. | | | | | | 8. [NEW COMMENT] INCLUDE ALL HATCH PATTERNS SHOWN ON | | | THE CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLANS IN THE LEGEND. | | | | | | 9. [NEW COMMENT] WHAT IMPACT WILL THE WELLFIELD | | | PROTECTION ZONES HAVE ON DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION? | | | | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | | | | 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED | | | WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP PRIOR TO STARTING | | | CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 4. SITE IS WITHIN THE JURISDICTIONAL LIMITS OF NPBCID | | | AND AN APPROVAL LETTER FROM NPBCID WILL BE NEEDED PRIOR | | | TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 (O) | | | 561-351-0510 (M) | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-07-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
05-07-2020 |
Time |
12:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
05-07-2020 |
Time |
12:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-05-07 12:16:10 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. 45TH ST. IS MAINTAINED BY PALM BEACH COUNTY AND | | | MILITARY TRAIL IS MAINTAINED BY FDOT. APPROVALS FROM | | | THESE AGENCIES WILL BE NEEDED BEFORE AN ENGINEERING | | | PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED. | | | | | | 2. CHECK WITH PALM BEACH COUNTY WHETHER THEY PREFER THE | | | SIDEWALK ALONG 45TH ST TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT BACK OF | | | CURB OR AT THE FUTURE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE. | | | | | | 3. CONSIDER REDUCING THE PARKING STALL DEPTHS BY TWO | | | FEET AND PROVIDE 2 FEET OF OVERHANG IN ADDITIONAL | | | LANDSCAPE WIDTH. | | | | | | 4. PROVIDE APPROVAL/ACCEPTANCE FROM FPL, FPUC AND ANY | | | OTHER UTILITY WITH INTERESTS IN THE | | | EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF | | | THE SITE WHERE THE DETENTION AREA IS PROPOSED. | | | | | | 5. REMOVE EXISTING DRIVEWAY ACCESS POINTS THAT WILL NOT | | | BE NEEDED AND RESTORE STANDARD SIDEWALK AND CURB AND | | | GUTTER. | | | | | | 6. LANDSCAPING PLANS SHOW LANDSCAPING WITHIN THE FUTURE | | | RIGHT OF WAY OF 45TH STREET. | | | . | | | 7. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO MEET SFWMD ERP CRITERIA. | | | | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | | | | 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED | | | WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP PRIOR TO STARTING | | | CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 4. SITE IS WITHIN THE JURISDICTIONAL LIMITS OF NPBCID | | | AND AN APPROVAL LETTER FROM NPBCID WILL BE NEEDED PRIOR | | | TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 (O) | | | 561-351-0510 (M) | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-14-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
08-14-2020 |
Time |
09:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-08-14 10:03:33 | PASSED WITH CONDITIONS: | | | | | | 1. REPLAT PRIOR TO C.O. | | | 2. SIGN-OFF FROM FDOT AND COUNTY. NEEDED PRIOR TO FINAL | | | SITE PLAN APPROVAL. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-13-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
05-13-2020 |
Time |
08:51 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-05-13 08:51:29 | 1. PROPERTY WILL NEED TO BE RE-PLATTED THROUGH THE | | | MINOR SUBDIVISION PROCESS WITH PLANNING. | | | 2. PLEASE NOTE THAT PROPERTY IS IN THE RIVIERA BEACH | | | WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AREA. PERMISSION FOR WPB | | | TO SERVE WILL NEED TO BE REQUESTED BY RIVIERA BEACH. | | | 3. PERMISSION OF RETENTION AREA WITHIN FPL, RIVIERA | | | BEACH AND GAS EASEMENTS WILL REQUIRE WRITTEN CONSENT BY | | | ALL. | | | 4. ARE PARCELS INTENDED TO BE LEASED OR FEE-SIMPLE | | | OWNERSHIP? | | | 5. APPROVAL BY FDOT FOR MILITARY TRAIL AND PB COUNTY | | | (MULTIPLE DEPTS.)FOR 45TH STREET WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR | | | TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL. | | | 6. SITE PLAN APPROVAL WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO | | | SUBMITTAL FOR ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
12-02-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
12-02-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-12-02 13:22:50 | APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: | | | 1. UNLESS ANGLED (MAXIMUM 45 DEGREE), PARKING SPACES ON | | | THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE | | | REMOVED IN ORDER TO AVOID PARKED VEHICLES BACKING UNTO | | | TRAVEL LANES. THIS IS A CRITICAL SAFETY AND CIRCULATION | | | ISSUE | | | 2. IN CASE ANGLED PARKING SPACES ARE PROPOSED ON THE | | | NORTH SIDE, PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS SHOWCASING | | | VEHICLES BACKING-OUT AND THEN HEADING EASTBOUND | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-13-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
11-13-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-11-13 16:56:47 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS: | | | 1. PROVIDE FDOT ACCESS MANAGEMENT APPROVAL LETTER, ONCE | | | OBTAINED | | | | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | 2. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 4-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER BETWEEN | | | THE CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND THE STREET CURB ALONG 45TH | | | ST. OTHERWISE, PROVIDE CORRESPONDENCE/DOCUMENTATION | | | FROM THE COUNTY REFUSING IMPLEMENTATION OF SUCH | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFER, ONCE RECEIVED | | | 3. PARKING SPACES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE REMOVED IN ORDER TO AVOID PARKED | | | VEHICLES BACKING UNTO TRAVEL LANES. THIS IS A CRITICAL | | | SAFETY AND CIRCULATION ISSUE. | | | 4. FOR THE PROPOSED PARKING SPACES ON THE NORTH SIDE, | | | PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS SHOWCASING VEHICLES | | | BACKING-OUT AND THEN HEADING WESTBOUND, AS WELL AS | | | EASTBOUND | | | 5. IN ORDER TO PROVIDE MORE MANEUVERING SPACE FOR THE | | | VEHICLES PARKED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT, CONSIDER SHIFTING THE TRAVEL LANES AND/OR | | | EXISTING EAST DRIVEWAY FURTHER NORTH. IN CASE, UTILIZE | | | THE EXISTING CURB CUT LOCATED AT THE BEGINNING OF THE | | | TURN LANE ON MILITARY TRAIL | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-13-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
08-13-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-08-13 14:39:10 | TRAFFIC STATEMENT COMMENTS: | | | 1. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER ONCE TRAFFIC STUDY HAS | | | BEEN REVIEWED | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | 2. PROVIDE FDOT ACCESS MANAGEMENT APPROVAL LETTER | | | 3. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 4-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER BETWEEN | | | THE CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND THE STREET CURB ALONG 45TH | | | ST. PROVIDE CORRESPONDENCE FROM THE COUNTY NOT WANTING | | | THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITHIN THEIR ROW. | | | 4. IN CASE, PROVIDE EASEMENT TO IMPLEMENT A BUFFERED | | | SIDEWALK ALONG 45TH ST | | | 5. ADA COMPLIANCE ? SHOWCASE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF | | | ADA CURB RAMPS IN THE SITE PLAN | | | 6. PARKING SPACES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE REMOVED, TO AVOID VEHICLES BACKING | | | UNTO TRAVEL LANES | | | 7. HOWEVER, CURRENT ROAD CONFIGURATION ON THE NORTH | | | SIDE OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE, AS | | | MAJOR VEHICULAR VOLUMES WILL TRAVERSE IT UPON PARCEL?S | | | FULL DEVELOPMENT. PROVIDE ALTERNATIVE ROADWAY | | | CONFIGURATION TO SEPARATE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INTERNAL | | | CIRCULATION FROM PASS-BY VEHICULAR VOLUMES TRAVELING | | | TO/FROM THE N MILITARY TRAIL DRIVEWAY | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
05-12-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-05-12 16:44:26 | **** 2020-05-14: ADDED COMMENT #5 | | | | | | | | | TRAFFIC STATEMENT COMMENTS: | | | 1. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER. | | | 2. PROVIDE INTERSECTION ANALYSIS BASED ON THE LATEST | | | VERSION OF HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL METHODOLOGY FOR THE | | | FOLLOWING MAJOR INTERSECTIONS: | | | A. 45TH ST AND MILITARY TRAIL | | | B. HAVERHILL RD AND MILITARY TRAIL | | | 3. THE WESTERLY DRIVEWAY ON 45TH ST IS FORECASTED TO | | | OPERATE WITH LOS F. PLEASE PROVIDE MITIGATION MEASURES. | | | | | | | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | 4. PROVIDE COUNTY DRIVEWAY LETTER | | | 5. PROVIDE FDOT DRIVEWAY LETTER | | | 6. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS OF DELIVERY, GARBAGE, AND | | | SERVICE VEHICLES, FOR THE FOLLOWING: | | | A. DRIVEWAY(S) ACCESS/EGRESS, FOR EACH POSSIBLE TURNING | | | MOVEMENT | | | B. INTERNAL CIRCULATION | | | 7. COORDINATE WITH PALM TRAN PERTAINING THE BUS SHELTER | | | RELOCATION. | | | 8. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 4-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER BETWEEN | | | THE CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND THE STREET CURB ALONG 45TH ST | | | 9. IF NECESSARY, PROVIDE EASEMENT FOR THE SIDEWALK | | | OUTSIDE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF WAY ALONG 45TH ST | | | 10. ADA COMPLIANCE | | | A. SHOW LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF ADA CURB RAMPS IN | | | THE SITE PLAN | | | B. PROVIDE OR UPGRADE ADA CURB RAMPS WHERE REQUIRED | | | 11. INDICATE THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED LOADING SPACE | | | DIMENSIONS ON SITE PLAN DATA TABLE | | | 12. PROVIDE 2-FOOT OVERHANG IN VEHICULAR PARKING | | | SPACES, INDICATE AND DIMENSION SUCH FEATURE ON SITE | | | PLANS | | | 13. PROVIDE WALKWAYS ALONG THE NORTH AND WEST SIDE OF | | | THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT | | | 14. FOR THE 30-FOOT WIDE DRIVEWAYS, PROVIDE DIAGONAL | | | HATCHING TO DELINEATE DRIVEWAY LANES FOR PASSENGER CARS | | | 15. PROVIDE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE AT THE CORNER OF 45TH | | | ST AND MILITARY TRAIL | | | 16. PROVIDE SIGHT DISTANCE AT THE DRIVEWAY ON MILITARY | | | TRAIL PER DOT REQUIREMENTS | | | 17. SHOW AND INDICATE DRIVEWAYS ADJACENT TO THE SITE ON | | | SITE PLAN | | | 18. PROVIDE PAVEMENT MARKING AT THE INTERNAL ROADWAY | | | JUNCTION | | | | | | | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1092 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
12-04-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
12-04-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
12-04-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-12-04 13:07:52 | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1) THE PARKING STALLS ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF THE | | | PROPOSED (WAWA) CONVENIENCE STORE BUILDING SHALL BE | | | ANGLED NO MORE THAN 45 DEGREES TO ALLOW FOR CUSTOMER | | | VEHICLES TO PULL INTO THE STALLS FROM AN EAST APPROACH | | | ONLY. AN AUTO-TURN ANALYSIS SHOWCASING VEHICLES | | | BACKING-OUT AND THEN HEADING EASTBOUND SHALL BE | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | 2) THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL ADHERE TO ALL CONDITIONS | | | OUTLINED IN THE TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) | | | REVIEW LETTER (PROJECT #200302) ISSUED BY THE PALM | | | BEACH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS | | | - TRAFFIC DIVISION ON AUGUST 19, 2020. | | | | | | 3) THE VENT STACK LOCATED EAST OF THE UNDERGROUND FUEL | | | TANK OF THE PROPOSED CONVENIENCE STORE WITH ACCESSORY | | | MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL SALE USE SHALL BE PAINTED TO MAKE | | | THE STACKS LOOK MORE FINISHED. | | | | | | 4) REPLAT OF THE PROPERTY SHALL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO | | | THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) FOR | | | THE FIRST USE CONSTRUCTED ON THE PROPERTY. | | | | | | 5) RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMITS FOR THE ACCESS POINTS ON 45TH | | | STREET (PALM BEACH COUNTY) AND MILITARY TRAIL (FLORIDA | | | DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION) SHALL BE REQUIRED PRIOR | | | TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL. | | | | | | 6) THE DOUBLE ENTRY TRASH AND RECYCLING ENCLOSURE | | | LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE WAWA CONVENIENCE STORE | | | BUILDING SHALL BE UTILIZED FOR SANITATION CONTAINERS AT | | | THE ENTRY POINT FACING SOUTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING (45TH | | | STREET) AND UTILIZED FOR RECYCLING CONTAINERS AT THE | | | ENTRY POINT FACING THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING. | | | | | | 7) PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION. | | | | | | 8) ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, INCLUDING NEW | | | CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR IMPROVEMENT OF AN | | | EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS | | | ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN $750,000.00 IS SUBJECT TO | | | THE ART IN PUBLIC PLACES REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 78, | | | ARTICLE V, OF THE CITY?S CODE OF ORDINANCES. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-13-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
08-13-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
08-13-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-08-13 11:00:28 | DESIGN GUIDELINES DOCUMENT: [PLEASE ASK STAFF FOR | | | MARKED-UP DESIGN GUIDELINES DOCUMENT FOR ADDITIONAL | | | NOTES.] | | | | | | 1.) CAREFUL CONSIDERATION MUST BE APPLIED TO THE LIST | | | OF PERMITTED USES BASED ON THE VISION, OVERALL SIZE AND | | | DESIGN OF THE CPD. THERE ARE ISSUES WITH SOME OF THE | | | PROPOSED USES PERMITTED BY RIGHT (I.E. USES LISTED AS | | | PXR IN THE ZLDRS HAVE ADDITIONAL STATE REQUIREMENTS AND | | | CANNOT BE LISTED AS BY-RIGHT USES); IN OTHER CASES, | | | OTHER USES (I.E. HOTELS/MOTELS) ARE NOT APPROPRIATE | | | BASED ON THE SIZE AND OVERALL MASTER DESIGN OF THE | | | SITE; AND SOME USES ARE JUST NOT APPROPRIATE (I.E. BAIT | | | AND TACKLE STORES, ETC.) GIVEN THE CHARACTER OF THE | | | AREA. PLEASE ADDRESS. | | | | | | 2.) THE LIST OF PERMITTED USES MAY BE SIMPLIFIED BY | | | SPECIFYING ONLY THOSE USES PERMITTED WITHIN THE CPD; | | | AND ALL OTHER USES SHALL BE PROHIBITED. | | | | | | 3.) ACCORDING TO THE DESIGN GUIDELINES, THE MINIMUM | | | BUILDING SETBACK ALONG 45TH STREET IS 15 FEET. IT IS | | | HIGHLY ENCOURAGED THAT A MAXIMUM BUILDING SETBACK IS | | | ESTABLISHED TO MAINTAIN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE | | | STREET AND ANY FUTURE BUILDING ALONG 45TH STREET. | | | SIMILAR REGULATIONS SHOULD ALSO BE APPLIED TO NEW | | | BUILDINGS ALONG MILITARY TRAIL. | | | | | | 4.) THE GUIDELINES MAY WANT TO ELABORATE ON PEDESTRIAN | | | ENTRANCES/BUILDING FRONTAGE REQUIREMENTS TO ENCOURAGE | | | SOME CONCEPTS OF NEW URBANISM. | | | | | | | | | GENERAL COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) THE ADDRESS LIST AFFIDAVIT WAS SIGNED AND SEALED BY | | | A NOTARY WHO HAS AN EXPIRED COMMISSION (APRIL 14, | | | 2020). THEREFORE, THE SIGNED ADDRESS LIST AFFIDAVIT IS | | | NOT VALID. PLEASE ADDRESS. | | | | | | 2.) WATER AND SEWER SERVICE IS PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF | | | RIVIERA BEACH. A LETTER FROM THE CITY OF RIVIERA BEACH | | | CONFIRMING THAT THE CITY HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR | | | WATER AND SEWER IS REQUIRED. THE LETTER MUST STATE THAT | | | THE CITY WILL NOT HAVE ANY ISSUES WITH SERVICING THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | [5/11/2020 REPEAT COMMENT: COMMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BY | | | THE AGENT; LETTER WAS NOT PROVIDED WITH THE 7/24 | | | RESUBMITTAL PACKET.] | | | | | | 3.) PROVIDE A LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY | | | DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING - TRAFFIC DIVISION, STATING | | | THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT MEETS THE TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE | | | STANDARDS (TPS) OF THE COUNTY. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE | | | PROJECT WILL NOT MOVE FORWARD TO THE PUBLIC HEARING | | | STAGE WITHOUT THE TPS LETTER FROM THE COUNTY. | | | | | | [5/11/2020 REPEAT COMMENT: COMMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BY | | | THE AGENT. THE TPS LETTER WAS NOT PROVIDED IN THE 7/24 | | | RESUBMITTAL PACKET.] | | | | | | 4.) PREDETERMINATION LETTERS REQUIRED FROM FDOT | | | (MILITARY TRAIL) AND PALM BEACH COUNTY (45TH STREET) | | | FOR THE ACCESS POINTS INTO THE DEVELOPMENT. | | | | | | [5/11/2020 REPEAT COMMENT: COMMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BY | | | THE AGENT. NO PREDETERMINATION LETTERS PROVIDED BY FDOT | | | AND THE COUNTY IN THE 7/24 RESUBMITTAL PACKET.] | | | | | | 5.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE JUSTIFICATION | | | STATEMENT: A) ADDRESS THE PERMITTED USES AS LISTED IN | | | THE DESIGN GUIDELINES AND WHY THE PERMITTED USES ARE | | | COMPATIBLE/COMPLIMENTARY AND HOW THE USES WILL ENHANCE | | | THE VISION OF THE CPD. B) PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT BUILDING | | | SQUARE FOOTAGES ARE INCONSISTENT WITH THE NUMBERS | | | PROVIDE IN THE TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT; C) CHECK THE | | | SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING TABLE. THERE ARE | | | INACCURACIES WITHIN THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE | | | TABLE; D) PLEASE ADDRESS WHY THE APPLICATION IS SEEKING | | | A REZONING TO CPD. IT MAY BE HELPFUL TO REVIEW SEC. | | | 94-207 OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS | | | (ZLDRS), TO ASSIST IN PROVIDING MORE INFORMATION IN THE | | | REQUEST FOR THE CPD. AT THIS POINT IN TIME, THERE IS NO | | | RELEVANCE TO THE REQUEST FOR THE CPD, AS THE | | | DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONVENIENCE STORE AND ACCESSORY GAS | | | STATION COULD BE BUILT WITHIN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL | | | (GC) ZONING DISTRICT WITH ADDITIONAL STANDARDS; E) | | | UNIFIED CONTROL PURSUANT TO ZLDR S.94-207(B)(8); F) | | | SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT WHICH IDENTIFIES THE | | | ANTICIPATED PROJECT START AND COMPLETION DATES, STAGES | | | OF DEVELOPMENT (IF ANY) AND THE LOCATION OF COMMON OPEN | | | SPACE TO BE PROVIDED AT EACH STAGE. [ZLDR | | | S.94-207(B)(10)C.] | | | | | | [5/11/20 REPEAT COMMENT: NO REVISED JUSTIFICATION | | | STATEMENT FOUND IN THE 7/24 RESUBMITTAL PACKET (DIGITAL | | | OR HARD COPY). AT MINIMUM, STAFF IS EXPECTING | | | STATEMENTS IN THE REVISED JUSTIFICATION LETTER | | | ADDRESSING THE ABOVE. | | | | | | 6.) PROVIDE WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION FROM PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY STATING THAT THE COUNTY IS REQUESTING THE | | | DEDICATION OF ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG 45TH | | | STREET. ADDITIONALLY, THIS INFORMATION SHOULD BE STATED | | | IN THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. | | | | | | [5/11/2020 REPEAT COMMENT: COMMENT ACKNOWLEDGED BY THE | | | AGENT. NO DOCUMENTATION FROM THE COUNTY PROVIDED IN THE | | | 7/24 RESUBMITTAL PACKET. ADDITIONALLY, THE SIZE OF THE | | | PROPOSED ROW DEDICATION HAS CHANGED FROM THE ORIGINAL | | | SUBMITTAL. PLEASE EXPLAIN THIS CHANGE.] | | | | | | | | | MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN (SHEET MP-1): | | | | | | 1.) PLEASE REVIEW AND ENSURE THE PARKING CALCULATIONS | | | FOR ALL PROPOSED AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS MEETS THE | | | REQUIREMENT FOR THE ALLOWABLE NUMBER OF ACCESS POINTS | | | INTO THE DEVELOPMENT. A WAIVER WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE | | | CPD IF THE DEVELOPMENT CANNOT MEET THE STANDARDS OF | | | ZLDR S.94-312. | | | | | | [5/11/2020 REPEAT COMMENT: INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION | | | PROVIDED TO DETERMINE IF TWO ACCESS POINTS ARE ALLOWED | | | ON 45TH STREET.] | | | | | | 2.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE MASTER PLAN | | | ILLUSTRATION: A) THERE ARE ARROWS DEPICTED IN THE PLAN. | | | WHAT DO THESE ARROWS REPRESENT? IT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO | | | PROVIDE A LEGEND. B) THE PROPOSED AREAS OF FAST FOOD | | | RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE-THROUGH SHOULD BE CLARIFIED FOR | | | CONSISTENCY (I.E. PLAN INDICATES THAT THOSE PORTIONS OF | | | THE CPD ARE DEDICATED FOR FAST-FOOD RESTAURANT ONLY). | | | C) THE ZONING DESIGNATION TO THE NORTHEAST IS | | | INDUSTRIAL (NOT GENERAL INDUSTRIAL). D) DISCUSSION WITH | | | STAFF IS NEEDED TO DETERMINE IF THE WAWA SITE PLAN | | | SHOULD BE ILLUSTRATED IN THE MASTER PLAN OR ON A | | | OVERALL SITE PLAN SHEET (WHICH WILL BE UPDATED AS | | | DEVELOPMENT OCCURS ON THE PROPERTY.) | | | | | | 3.) IN THE SCHEDULE OF USES: IT SHOULD REFERENCE THE | | | PERMITTED USES AS THOSE USES LISTED IN THE ADOPTED | | | DESIGN GUIDELINES DOCUMENT. (PLEASE SEE STAFF NOTES IN | | | THE DESIGN GUIDELINES DOCUMENT SECTION). | | | | | | 4.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE OVERALL CPD | | | SITE DATA TABULAR: A) TOTAL FAR IS 0.12 (NOT 0.11). B) | | | CLARIFY FAST FOOD RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE-THROUGH FOR | | | CONSISTENCY. | | | | | | 5.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE OVERALL SITE | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS TABULAR: A) THE MINIMUM REAR | | | (WEST) BUILDING SETBACK IS 15 FT. SINCE IT ABUTS A | | | RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT (NOT 5 FT.). THIS SHOULD BE | | | CLARIFIED FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE ZLDRS. | | | | | | 6.) PER ZLDR S.94-207(B)(9), THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR | | | THE CPD SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE MASTER PLAN DOCUMENT. | | | | | | | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE APPLICANT CONSIDER | | | MOVING THE BUILDING CLOSER TO 45TH STREET TO IMPROVE | | | THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE BUILDING AND THE STREET. | | | | | | [5/11/2020 MODIFIED COMMENT #1: ALTHOUGH THE PROPOSED | | | DESIGN GUIDELINES SPECIFIES A MINIMUM SETBACK OF 15 FT. | | | FOR THE RETAIL/RESTAURANT BUILDINGS ALONG 45TH STREET, | | | A MAXIMUM BUILDING SETBACK SHOULD ALSO BE ESTABLISHED | | | TO ENCOURAGE THE BUILDINGS MAINTAIN AN ACTIVE | | | RELATIONSHIP WITH THE STREET FRONTAGE ALONG 45TH | | | STREET. NOTED EXCEPTION FOR BUILDING SETBACK FOR THE | | | AREA DESIGNATED FOR THE CONVENIENCE | | | STORE/GAS STATION SHALL ALSO BE NOTED IN THE DESIGN | | | GUIDELINES.] | | | | | | 2.) THE PROPOSED FREESTANDING SIGNS ALONG 45TH STREET | | | AND MILITARY TRAIL SEEM TO ENCROACH INTO THE 5 FT. WIDE | | | REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER. PLEASE ADDRESS. | | | | | | 3.) PLEASE IDENTIFY THE 2 FT. CURB OVERHANG IN THE | | | SOUTHWEST PARKING AREA. | | | | | | 4.) AIR PARKING SPACE DETAIL (SHEET SP-2) DOES NOT | | | ILLUSTRATE A WHEEL STOP OR CURB OVERHANG TO PREVENT | | | VEHICLES FROM CONFLICTING WITH THE PROPOSED AIR PUMP | | | PARKING ONLY SIGN. PLEASE ADDRESS. | | | | | | 5.) NO INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THE HEIGHT IN THE | | | BOLLARD DETAIL (SHEET SP-2). | | | | | | 6.) THE BICYCLE RACK SHALL BE LOCATED NEAR THE | | | PRINCIPAL ENTRANCE OF THE BUILDING AS PRACTICABLE. THE | | | CURRENT LOCATION OF THE BICYCLE RACK IS INCONSISTENT | | | WITH THIS REQUIREMENT. [ZLDR S.94-485(Q)] | | | | | | [5/11/2020 REPEAT COMMENT: NO CHANGE TO THE LOCATION OF | | | THE BICYCLE RACK. COMMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BY THE | | | AGENT. STAFF BELIEVES THAT THE PROPOSED LOCATION IS | | | INCONSISTENT WITH THE BICYCLE DESIGN STANDARDS OF THE | | | ZLDRS, AND THE RACK CAN BE PLACED CLOSER TO THE | | | PRINCIPAL ENTRANCE OF THE BUILDING.] | | | | | | 7.) THERE IS NO BUFFER/SEPARATION BETWEEN THE MAIN | | | DRIVE AISLE OF THE CPD AND THE PARKING AREA ON THE | | | NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING. | | | | | | [5/11/2020 MODIFIED/REPEAT COMMENT #16: ALTHOUGH A | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFER HAS BEEN PROVIDED ON THE WEST SIDE OF | | | THE PROPOSED WAWA LEASE AREA, STAFF IN PLANNING AND | | | ENGINEERING HAD ALSO EXPRESSED CONCERNS WITH NOT | | | BUFFERING THE PARKING AREA FROM THE MAIN DRIVE AISLE ON | | | THE NORTH SIDE OF THE LEASE AREA. STAFF HAD RECOMMENDED | | | PROVIDING A BUFFER BETWEEN THE PARKING AREA AND DRIVE | | | AISLE OR ELIMINATING THE PARKING AREA TO THE NORTH SIDE | | | OF THE BUILDING.] | | | | | | 8.) THE VENT STACK LOCATED EAST OF THE UNDERGROUND FUEL | | | TANKS SHALL BE PAINTED TO MAKE THE STACKS LOOK MORE | | | FINISHED. [NOTE: THIS WILL BE ADDED AS A CONDITION.] | | | | | | 9.) PLEASE ILLUSTRATE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES CONSISTENT | | | WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDRS. | | | | | | 10.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE WAWA PARKING | | | DATA TABULAR: LOADING ZONE CALCULATIONS (REQUIRED AND | | | PROVIDED) ARE MISSING. | | | | | | 11.) ELIMINATE THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE CPD ON | | | SHEET SP-3 AND PROVIDE IN THE MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN | | | AS REQUIRED BY THE ZLDRS. | | | | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) ADDITIONAL FACADE TREATMENT SHALL BE ADDED TO THE | | | NORTH BUILDING FACADE. THIS BUILDING FACADE IS ALSO | | | VISIBLE ALONG A MAIN INTERNAL DRIVE WITHIN THE | | | DEVELOPMENT. | | | | | | [5/11/2020 MODIFIED/REPEAT COMMENT: ALTHOUGH THE WEST | | | FA?ADE HAD BEEN MODIFIED WITH ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL | | | ARTICULATION, THE NORTH FA?ADE WAS LEFT UNCHANGED.] | | | | | | | | | SIGNAGE COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) PER ZLDR S.94-408(G), ONLY ONE (1) GAS PRICE SIGN | | | IS PERMITTED PER GASOLINE STATION. THE SITE IS | | | PROPOSING TWO (2) GAS PRICE SIGNS WHICH IS NOT | | | PERMITTED. | | | | | | [NOTE: THIS COMMENT WAS MISSED IN THE PRELIMINARY | | | REVIEW.] | | | | | | 2.) THE PROPOSED DESIGN GUIDELINES OUTLINE THE | | | REGULATIONS FOR FREESTANDING SIGNAGE WITHIN THE CPD. IS | | | THERE A MASTER FREESTANDING SIGN PROGRAM/PLAN TO | | | SUPPORT/SUPPLEMENT THE SIGNAGE REQUIREMENTS IN THE | | | DESIGN GUIDELINES? | | | | | | 3.) DIMENSIONS FOR THE GAS PRICE SIGN ON SHEET SP-2 | | | (WAWA SITE DEVELOPMENT DETAILS) ARE INCOMPLETE (I.E. | | | WIDTH, SIGN AREA PROPOSED). PLEASE ADDRESS. | | | | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX | | | (6) PAPER COPIES, ONE REDUCED COPY IN 11 INCHES X 17 | | | INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY | | | RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. | | | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE | | | QUESTIONS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-11-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
05-11-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
05-11-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-05-11 14:25:56 | GENERAL COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) PER THE INSTRUCTIONS OF THE 2020 DEVELOPMENT | | | APPLICATION, THE ADDRESS LIST AND RADIUS MAP SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED BY THE PALM BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S | | | OFFICE. PLEASE PROVIDE EVIDENCE THAT THIS TASK WAS | | | COMPLETED ACCORDINGLY. | | | | | | 2.) WATER AND SEWER SERVICE IS PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF | | | RIVIERA BEACH. A LETTER FROM RIVIERA BEACH CONFIRMING | | | THAT THE CITY HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR WATER AND | | | SEWER IS REQUIRED. THE LETTER MUST STATE THAT THE CITY | | | WILL NOT HAVE ANY ISSUES WITH SERVICING THE PROPOSED | | | PROJECT. | | | | | | 3.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE PUBLIC | | | UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR | | | STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE COLLECTION SERVICES. | | | | | | 4.) PROVIDE A LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY | | | DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC | | | DIVISION, STATING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT MEETS THE | | | TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) OF THE COUNTY. | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PROJECT WILL NOT MOVE FORWARD TO | | | THE PUBLIC HEARING STAGE WITHOUT THE TPS LETTER FROM | | | THE COUNTY. | | | | | | 5.) PREDETERMINATION LETTERS REQUIRED FROM FDOT | | | (MILITARY TRAIL) AND PALM BEACH COUNTY (45TH STREET) | | | FOR THE ACCESS POINTS INTO THE DEVELOPMENT. | | | | | | 6.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE JUSTIFICATION | | | STATEMENT: A.) IN ORDER FOR THE "CONVENIENCE/GROCERY | | | STORE AND ACCESSORY MOTOR FUEL SALES" USE TO BE WAIVED | | | FROM THE ADDITIONAL STANDARDS/REQUIREMENTS OF THE | | | ZLDRS, THE APPLICANT MUST SPECIFICALLY REQUEST THAT THE | | | USE BE A "PERMITTED USE BY RIGHT" WITHIN THE PROPOSED | | | CPD; B.) PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGES | | | ARE INCONSISTENT WITH THE NUMBERS PROVIDE IN THE | | | TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT; C.) CHECK THE SURROUNDING | | | LAND USE AND ZONING TABLE. THERE ARE INACCURACIES | | | WITHIN THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE TABLE; D.) | | | PLEASE ADDRESS WHY THE APPLICATION IS SEEKING A | | | REZONING TO CPD. IT MAY BE HELPFUL TO REVIEW SEC. | | | 94-207 OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS | | | (ZLDRS), TO ASSIST IN PROVIDING MORE INFORMATION IN THE | | | REQUEST FOR THE CPD. AT THIS POINT IN TIME, THERE IS NO | | | RELEVANCE TO THE REQUEST FOR THE CPD, AS THE | | | DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONVENIENCE STORE AND ACCESSORY GAS | | | STATION COULD BE BUILT WITHIN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL | | | (GC) ZONING DISTRICT WITH ADDITIONAL STANDARDS; E.) | | | UNIFIED CONTROL PURSUANT TO ZLDR S.94-207(B)(8); F.) | | | SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT WHICH IDENTIFIES THE | | | ANTICIPATED PROJECT START AND COMPLETION DATES, STAGES | | | OF DEVELOPMENT (IF ANY) AND THE LOCATION OF COMMON OPEN | | | SPACE TO BE PROVIDED AT EACH STAGE. [ZLDR | | | S.94-207(B)(10)C.] | | | | | | 7.) PROVIDE WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION FROM PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY STATING THAT THE COUNTY IS REQUESTING THE | | | DEDICATION OF ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG 45TH | | | STREET. ADDITIONALLY, THIS INFORMATION SHOULD BE STATED | | | IN THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. | | | | | | 8.) HAS THERE BEEN ANY COORDINATION WITH PALM TRAN ON | | | THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE BUS STOP/BUS SHELTER AT | | | THE SOUTH END OF THE PROPERTY? IF SO, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | DOCUMENTATION. | | | | | | 9.) DESIGN REGULATIONS FOR THE OVERALL SITE, TO ENSURE | | | USE OF INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT | | | TECHNIQUES IN ORDER TO CREATE A MORE DESIRABLE AND | | | ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CONSIDERED AT THIS TIME | | | (I.E. REGULATIONS THAT WOULD REQUIRE BUILDINGS TO BE | | | LOCATED CLOSER TO THE STREET THROUGH MINIMUM/MAXIMUM | | | BUILDING SETBACKS, ARCHITECTURAL, ETC.). | | | | | | 10.) A PLAT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE PARCELS OF THE | | | PROJECT SITE. | | | | | | | | | | | | CPD BUBBLE PLAN/MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED USES | | | ARE INCONSISTENT WITH THE NUMBERS PROVIDED IN THE | | | TRAFFIC IMPACT AND JUSTIFICATION STATEMENTS. PLEASE | | | ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. | | | | | | 2.) ALTHOUGH THE CPD BUBBLE PLAN (SHEET BP-1) IS | | | RELEVANT AND INFORMATIVE TO THE APPLICATION SUBMITTAL, | | | STAFF BELIEVES THAT SOME OF THE INFORMATION (I.E. | | | PROPOSED USES, CONCURRENCY SUMMARY, DEVELOPMENT AREA | | | IDENTIFICATION, ETC.) COULD BE TRANSFERRED TO THE | | | MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN (SHEET MP-1). | | | | | | 3.) WRITTEN LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY | | | SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE PLAN. [ZLDR S.94-207(B)(9)B.] | | | | | | 4.) AGREEMENTS, PROVISIONS OR COVENANTS WHICH GOVERN | | | THE USE, MAINTENANCE, AND CONTINUED PROTECTION OF THE | | | PROPOSED CPD AND ANY OF ITS COMMON AREAS SHALL BE NOTED | | | IN THE PLAN. [ZLDR S.94-207(B)(9)C.] | | | | | | 5.) CALCULATIONS IN THE OVERALL SITE DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS SHALL BE BASED ON THE "NET TOTAL SITE AREA" | | | (NOT THE "TOTAL SITE AREA") AS THERE ARE PORTIONS OF | | | THE SITE THAT ARE DEDICATED TO THE COUNTY FOR | | | ADDITIONAL ROW. | | | | | | 6.) PLEASE PROVIDE A BREAKDOWN OF THE "GENERAL | | | COMMERCIAL/RESTAURANT" USES. ACCORDING TO THE BUBBLE | | | PLAN (SHEET BP-1), 23,400 SQ. FT. OF GFA IS PROPOSED | | | FOR BOTH USES. | | | | | | 7.) CALCULATIONS IN THE CONCURRENCY SUMMARY TABLE SEEMS | | | TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH THE CALCULATIONS PROVIDED IN | | | THE BUBBLE PLAN (SHEET BP-1). PLEASE ADDRESS FOR | | | CONSISTENCY. | | | " | | | 8.) ACCORDING TO MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN (SHEET MP-1), | | | THE WAWA IS ON A 1.56 ACRE "PARCEL/LEASE AREA". PLEASE | | | CLARIFY IF A SUBDIVISION IS INTENDED FOR THE CPD. IT | | | SHOULD BE NOTED THAT SUBDIVIDING THE CPD WILL REQUIRE | | | EACH SUBDIVIDED PARCEL TO INDIVIDUALLY MEET THE | | | DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE ZLDRS AS A STAND-ALONE | | | PROJECT AS FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OCCURS. WAIVERS MAY BE | | | REQUIRED IF THE PARCELS CANNOT MEET THE MINIMUM | | | DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE ZLDRS. | | | | | | 9.) THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE WAWA SITE SHALL BE BASED | | | ON THE NET TOTAL SITE AREA (IF NO SUBDIVISION IS | | | PROPOSED). | | | | | | 10.) SHOW FUTURE/PROPOSED INTERNAL PEDESTRIAN | | | CONNECTION BETWEEN DEVELOPMENT SITES WITHIN THE CPD. | | | | | | 11.) PLEASE REVIEW AND ENSURE THE PARKING CALCULATIONS | | | FOR ALL PROPOSED AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS MEETS THE | | | REQUIREMENT FOR THE ALLOWABLE NUMBER OF ACCESS POINTS | | | INTO THE DEVELOPMENT. A WAIVER WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE | | | CPD IF THE DEVELOPMENT CANNOT MEET THE STANDARDS OF | | | ZLDR S.94-312. | | | | | | | | | | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE APPLICANT CONSIDER | | | MOVING THE BUILDING CLOSER TO 45TH STREET TO IMPROVE | | | THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE BUILDING AND THE STREET. | | | | | | 2.) THE LOCATION OF THE LOADING ZONE AND DUMPSTER | | | ENCLOSURE WOULD BE MORE APPROPRIATE ON THE NORTH SIDE | | | OF THE BUILDING TO PROVIDE FOR BETTER SCREENING OF THE | | | USE FROM THE INTERNAL DRIVE AISLES AND ADJACENT FUTURE | | | DEVELOPMENT. | | | | | | 3.) OUTDOOR STORAGE OF GOODS FOR SALE IS PROHIBITED | | | WITHIN THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. THE PLAN SHOWS A | | | PROPANE KIOSK AND ICE MACHINE ALONG THE SIDES OF THE | | | PROPOSED BUILDING. PLEASE ADDRESS. [ZLDR S.94-207(D)(9) | | | AND S.94-315(B)(1)] | | | | | | 4.) THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE WAWA SITE DATA, | | | BUILDING SETBACK DATA AND IN THE SITE PLAN IMPLIES THAT | | | THE CPD WILL BE SUBDIVIDED. PLEASE CLARIFY. IF THE | | | INTENT IS NOT TO SUBDIVIDE THE CPD (AS DISCUSSED DURING | | | THE APPLICANT'S PRE-APPLICATION MEETING), THEN THERE | | | SHOULD BE NO REFERENCE TO PARCEL LINES AND THE PROVIDED | | | BUILDING SETBACKS WOULD NEED TO BE CORRECTED. | | | | | | 5.) SETBACK DISTANCES FOR THE PROPOSED FUEL PRICING | | | SIGNS ARE REQUIRED. SETBACK DISTANCE FOR THE SIGNS | | | SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ZLDR | | | S.94-408(D). | | | | | | 6.) PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE BUS STOP/BUS SHELTER AND | | | INCLUDE SETBACK DIMENSIONS FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 7.) SHOW LOCATION OF ALL PROPOSED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. | | | ANY ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT SHALL BE FULLY SCREENED FROM VIEW | | | BY A PARAPET. [ZLDR S.94-305(B)](4)] | | | | | | 8.) PER ZLDR S.94-443(5), NON-MOUNTABLE CONCRETE | | | CURBING OF THE TYPE CHARACTERIZED AS TYPE "D" SHALL BE | | | REQUIRED FOR ALL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS. THE PLAN PROPOSES | | | CURBING (I.E. WAWA TYPE B1 AND F1 CURBS) THAT ARE | | | INCONSISTENT WITH THIS ZONING CODE REQUIREMENT. PLEASE | | | ADDRESS. | | | | | | 9.) WHEELS STOPS SHALL BE INSTALLED TO PROTECT | | | LANDSCAPED AREAS. THERE ARE CURRENTLY NO WHEEL STOPS OR | | | 2 FT. CURB OVERHANG DELINEATED IN THE PLAN TO | | | DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR S.94-485(G)] | | | | | | 10.) PARKING STALL STRIPING DETAIL ON SHEET SP-2 IS | | | INCONSISTENT WITH THE STALL STRIPING STANDARDS OF THE | | | CITY. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. [ZLDR S.94-485, | | | FIGURE XV-2] | | | | | | 11.) PARKING STALLS ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE | | | BUILDING DIFFICULT TO SEE. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CLARITY. | | | | | | 12.) ILLUSTRATE THE SPECIFIC LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS | | | FOR THE LOADING ZONE. A 10 FT. BY 25 FT. LOADING ZONE | | | IS REQUIRED FOR THE WAWA PROJECT. [ZLDR S.94-485(P)] | | | | | | 13.) THE BICYCLE RACK PROVIDED ON SHEET SP-2 IS NOT | | | PERMITTED. PLEASE PROVIDE A BICYCLE RACK THAT IS | | | CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S BICYCLE PARKING GUIDELINES. | | | NOTE: A COPY OF THE CITY'S BICYCLE PARKING GUIDELINES | | | IS AVAILABLE BY REQUEST. | | | | | | 14.) INCLUDE A BICYCLE RACK DETAIL SHOWING DIMENSIONS | | | TO THE CURB, BUILDINGS, ETC. DIMENSIONS FOR THE | | | PLACEMENT OF THE RACK SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE | | | STANDARDS OF THE CITY'S BICYCLE PARKING GUIDELINES. | | | | | | 15.) THE BICYCLE RACK SHALL BE LOCATED NEAR THE | | | PRINCIPAL ENTRANCE OF THE BUILDING AS PRACTICABLE. THE | | | CURRENT LOCATION OF THE BICYCLE RACK IS INCONSISTENT | | | WITH THIS REQUIREMENT. [ZLDR S.94-485(Q)] | | | | | | 16.) THERE IS NO BUFFER/SEPARATION BETWEEN THE MAIN | | | DRIVE AISLE AND THE WAWA LOADING ZONE/PARKING AREA. | | | | | | | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) ADDITIONAL FACADE TREATMENT SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR | | | THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS (I.E. WEST ELEVATION) THAT ARE | | | HIGHLY VISIBLE FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY OR THE | | | MAIN INTERNAL DRIVEWAYS WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT. | | | | | | | | | | | | SIGNAGE COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) ANY INFORMATION/DETAILS ON PROPOSED SIGNAGE FOR THE | | | OVERALL CPD SHALL BE SUBMITTED AT THIS TIME. PLEASE | | | NOTE THAT ALL SIGNAGE (FREESTANDING AND WALL SIGNS) | | | SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH ARTICLE XIII OF THE ZLDRS. | | | | | | 2.) DETAILS FOR THE TWO (2) FUEL PRICING SIGNS | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | | | | | | | PHOTOMETRIC/LIGHTING PLAN COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) ANY SOURCE OF ILLUMINATION LOCATED WITHIN A CPD | | | SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE FOOTCANDLE AT OR BEYOND THE | | | BOUNDARIES OF THE PD. THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHOWS THAT | | | THE LIGHTING SPILLOVER WILL EXCEED THIS REQUIREMENT AT | | | THE INGRESS/EGRESS POINTS. [ZLDR S.94-207(D)(8)] | | | | | | 2.) SHOW SETBACK DISTANCE BETWEEN THE LIGHT POLE | | | FIXTURES AND THE PROPERTY LINE(S). A MINIMUM SETBACK OF | | | 5 FT. FROM THE PROPERTY LINE IS REQUIRED. [ZLDR | | | S.94-145(2)] | | | | | | 3.) PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING NOTE IN THE PLAN: ALL OUTDOOR | | | LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE GLARE AND SHALL BE | | | ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE AWAY FROM ALL | | | ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT RESIDENCES, OR | | | PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 34-309(A) | | | OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. | | | | | | | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX | | | (6) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 INCHES X | | | 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 INCHES, AND | | | AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY | | | RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. | | | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE ANY | | | QUESTIONS. | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |