City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Details - Project Z20030005

Plan Review Stops For Project Z20030005

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	10-08-2020			Cont ID
Sent By	rbrown			Date	10-08-2020	Time	14:11	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rbrown			Date	10-08-2020	Time	14:11	Sent To

Notes

2020-10-08 14:12:33	REVIEWED AND PASSED UNDER Z19050019. THE PROPOSED
	CHANGES DO NOT NEGATIVELY IMPACT THE PREVIOUS PASSED
	REVIEW.


	ROBERT BROWN
	BUILDING OFFICIAL
	TEL: 561 805 6652
	EMAIL: [email protected]

2020-03-09 15:49:45

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	09-23-2020			Cont ID
Sent By	pleduc			Date	09-23-2020	Time	11:05	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc			Date	09-23-2020	Time	11:05	Sent To

Notes

2020-09-23 11:05:57	FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED CHANGES AND
	APPROVES, HOWEVER, THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS
	SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW
	OR APPROVAL.

	THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
	THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
	REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.

	PETER LEDUC
	FIRE MARSHAL
	WEST PALM BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT
	561-804-4709
	[email protected]

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	12-29-2020			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	12-29-2020	Time	12:37	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	12-29-2020	Time	12:37	Sent To

Notes

2020-12-29 12:37:47	FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
	PROJECT: 575 ROSEMARY (MACY?S) MINOR AMENDMENT
	Z20030005
	DECEMBER 29, 2020
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

	1. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LANDSCAPING FOR THE STREETSCAPE
	SECTIONS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED
	PLANS DATED 10/25/19.

	2. SATISFIED. PUBLIC OPEN SPACE ?A? PLAZA AREA AT
	GROUND LEVEL CANNOT HAVE THE THIN STRIP ALONG THE
	BUILDING COUNTED AS IT DOES NOT MEET THE NO ONE SIDE
	FIVE TIMES ANY OTHER SIDE REQUIREMENT. PLAZA INTENT IS
	TO HAVE CONSOLIDATED USEABLE AREA AS PREVIOUSLY
	APPROVED.

	3. SATISFIED. ROOFTOP GARDEN ON LEVEL 3 NEEDS TO SHOW
	ALL AREAS WITHIN THE PERIMETER AS PRIVATE OPEN SPACE,
	ONLY EXCEPTING THE SOLID COVERED AREAS, THEN SHOW
	REQUIREMENTS FOR VEGETATED AREA.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	10-16-2020			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	10-16-2020	Time	15:01	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	10-16-2020	Time	10:25	Sent To

Notes

2020-10-16 15:02:00	FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
	PROJECT: 575 ROSEMARY (MACY?S) MINOR AMENDMENT
	Z20030005
	OCTOBER 16, 2020
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

	1. SHOW THE LANDSCAPING FOR THE STREETSCAPE SECTIONS ON
	THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED PLANS DATED
	10/25/19.

	2. PUBLIC OPEN SPACE ?A? PLAZA AREA AT GROUND LEVEL
	CANNOT HAVE THE THIN STRIP ALONG THE BUILDING COUNTED
	AS IT DOES NOT MEET THE NO ONE SIDE FIVE TIMES ANY
	OTHER SIDE REQUIREMENT. PLAZA INTENT IS TO HAVE
	CONSOLIDATED USEABLE AREA AS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED.

	3. ROOFTOP GARDEN ON LEVEL 3 NEEDS TO SHOW ALL AREAS
	WITHIN THE PERIMETER AS PRIVATE OPEN SPACE, ONLY
	EXCEPTING THE SOLID COVERED AREAS, THEN SHOW
	REQUIREMENTS FOR VEGETATED AREA.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	4	Status	P	Date	02-25-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	02-25-2021	Time	11:30	Rev Time	1.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	02-25-2021	Time	10:02	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	01-12-2021			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	01-12-2021	Time	09:10	Rev Time	4.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	12-30-2020	Time	14:16	Sent To

Notes

2021-01-12 09:11:23	CASE NO. PB 950XXXXX - RESUBMITTAL
	575 S. ROSEMARY REDEVELOPMENT
	575 S. ROSEMARY

	- CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,
	[email protected]

	- PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	- WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TWO
	(2) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT
	OF ALL PLANS.

	1) THE UPDATED TABLE ON SHEET A0.09.1 LISTS THE GROUND
	FLOOR AS HAVING 26,054 SQUARE FEET; HOWEVER, WHEN
	ADDING UP THE VARIOUS AREAS, THE TOTAL IS 26, 266
	SQUARE FEET. IT APPEARS THAT THE SHOP SQUARE FOOTAGE
	MAY HAVE BEEN LEFT OUT OF THE TABLE. THE TOTAL SQUARE
	FOOTAGE VALUE ON THE TABLE AND ON SHEET A0.01 PARKING
	REQUIRED NEED TO BE CORRECTED (AS WELL AS ANY OTHER
	TABLE). NOTE: PARKING REQUIREMENT DOES NOT CHANGE.

	2) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING UPDATED ELEVATION DRAWINGS
	SHOWING THE ROOFTOP FEATURES. IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH
	THE CITYPLACE DRI, SCREENING REQUIREMENTS, YOU NEED TO
	HAVE EITHER THE PARAPET OR OTHER METHOD OF SCREENING
	INSTALLED TO THE HEIGHT OF THE ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT IN
	ORDER TO SCREEN IT FROM PUBLIC VIEW. BASED ON THE
	HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING, THE PUBLIC VIEW ENCOMPASSES
	MORE THAN THE PERSON STANDING AT STREET LEVEL AT THE
	BASE OF THE BUILDING. THE SCREENING TO THE HEIGHT OF
	THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IS THE STANDARD FOR ROOFTOP
	EQUIPMENT ON TOWER IN THE DMP. THE BUILDINGS WITHIN THE
	DRI ARE TO BE CONSISTENT WITH BUILDINGS SURROUNDING THE
	DRI.

	3) SHEET A0.10 DRAWING 1 LISTS FLOORS 5-21. THIS NEEDS
	TO BE CORRECTED TO FLOORS 5-20 SINCE THE PH IS LEVEL 21
	AND IS SHOWN ON DRAWING 2.

	4) THE SPECIFICS OF THE REQUIRED VEHICLE CHARGER
	INSTALLATION WILL BE REVIEWED DURING THE BUILDING
	PERMIT REVIEW FOR THEIR INSTALLATION IN THE GARAGE.
	PLEASE NOTE THAT THE CITY'S BUILDING OFFICIAL HAS
	DETERMINED THAT AN ACCESSIBLE VEHICLE CHARGING SPACE
	NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED AT A RATIO OF 1:25 PER VEHICLE
	CHARGING SPACES PROVIDED. THIS WILL IMPACT NOT ONLY THE
	PLANS AS SHOWN WITH THIS APPLICATION, BUT ALSO THE
	PROPOSED CHARGING STATIONS IN OTHER GARAGES. THE
	SPECIFICS WILL NEED TO BE DISCUSSED WITH THE BUILDING
	DIVISION AS THIS PROCESS MOVES FORWARD. THE CORRECTION
	MAY BE TO MOVE ONE OF THE CHARGING STATIONS BETWEEN AN
	ADA SPACE AND A REGULAR SPACE.

	5) THE PARKING GARAGE IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM
	OF 10 ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS OR ELECTRIC
	CHARGING STATIONS EQUAL TO TWO (2) PERCENT OF THE TOTAL
	PARKING SPACES REQUIRED FOR THE NEW BUILDING BUILT
	WITHIN THE ROSEMARY SQUARE CENTER SUBAREA, WHICHEVER IS
	LESS, IN THE D BLOCK PARKING GARAGE. WHILE THERE ARE 10
	PARKING SPACES ADJACENT TO THE PROPOSED CHARGING
	STATIONS, THE PLANS TO NOT CLEARLY INDICATE THE ABILITY
	TO CHARGE 10 CARS AT ONE TIME. WHILE THIS DOES NOT NEED
	TO BE SHOWN NOW, IT WILL NEED TO BE INCLUDED AT THE
	TIME OF PERMITTING FOR THE GARAGE UPGRADES.

	6) PLEASE REMEMBER THAT ANY TENANT SPACE HAVING MORE
	THAN 10,000 SQUARE FEET OF FLOOR AREA MUST PROVIDE A
	SHOWER AND CHANGING ROOM. WHILE THIS WILL BE VERIFIED
	DURING THE TENANT BUILD OUT, PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE
	OVERALL BUILDING LAYOUT IS NOT DESIGNED IN SUCH A WAY
	TO HINDER THE TENANT BUILD OUT.

	7) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE CENTER SUBAREA REQUIRE THE
	FOLLOWING WHICH NEEDS TO BE CLEARLY INDICATED IN THE
	PERMIT DRAWINGS:

	A. THE BUILDING ROOF IS TO EITHER HAVE SOLAR
	INSTALLATIONS OR UTILIZE A GREEN ROOF INSTALLATION
	(ACTIVE OR PASSIVE); EXCLUSIVE OF AREAS REQUIRED FOR
	MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT.

	B. THE ROOFTOP RAINWATER IS TO BE CAPTURED AND RETAINED
	ONSITE. THE USE OF THE CAPTURED RAINWATER FOR
	IRRIGATION AND OTHER NON-POTABLE USES IS ENCOURAGED;
	HOWEVER, AT A MINIMUM, ONSITE GROUNDWATER INFILTRATION
	IS REQUIRED.

	C. THE WORKFORCE UNITS MUST BE DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOUT
	THE BUILDING WITH NO MORE THAN 50% OF THE UNITS ON ANY
	ONE FLOOR BEING WORKFORCE SET ASIDE UNITS. WORKFORCE
	UNITS WILL ALSO NOT BE GROUPED INTO ANY ONE UNIT SIZE
	(E.G. - STUDIOS, 1 BEDROOM) ON A GIVEN FLOOR. THE
	VARIETY OF UNIT BEDROOM SIZES WILL BE MAXIMIZED TO THE
	GREATEST EXTENT THAT IS FEASIBLE.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	10-22-2020			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	10-22-2020	Time	11:36	Rev Time	8.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	10-15-2020	Time	09:24	Sent To

Notes

2020-10-22 11:37:18	CASE NO. PB 950XXXXX
	575 S. ROSEMARY REDEVELOPMENT
	575 S. ROSEMARY

	- CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,
	[email protected]

	- PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	- WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TWO
	(2) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT
	OF ALL PLANS.

	1) THE DOCK MANAGER OFFICE AND SHOP (335 SF) NEED TO BE
	INCLUDED IN THE RETAIL NET SF FOR THE PARKING
	CALCULATIONS. NOTE: PARKING REQUIREMENT DOES NOT
	CHANGE.

	2) WHAT IS HAPPENING IN THE AREA ON LEVEL 4 THAT IS
	ADJACENT TO THE BAR? IT IS LISTED AS 538 GROSS SQ. FT.,
	BUT NOT HIGHLIGHTED ON SHEET A0.09.

	3) PASSAGEWAY:

	A. THE NOTE REQUIRING THE PUBLIC SPACE EASEMENT AT THE
	WESTERN TERMINUS OF THE PASSAGEWAY NEEDS TO BE ADDED ON
	DRAWING 1 ON SHEET A0.05. THIS IS REQUIRED BY THE
	DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS IN RESOLUTION NO. 362-19.

	B. THE PASSAGEWAY IS PUBLIC OPEN SPACE; THEREFORE,
	DIRECT ACCESS IS REQUIRED FROM THE NORTH SIDE OF THE
	BUILDING TO THE PASSAGEWAY.

	4) PUBLIC OPEN SPACE - PLAZA

	A. NO ONE SIDE OF A PLAZA MAY BE 5X THE LENGTH OF
	ANOTHER SIDE. THE HIBISCUS ROW FRONTAGE IS SLIGHTLY
	LESS THAN 9 FEET WHILE THE ROSEMARY ROW FRONTAGE IS
	OVER 109 FEET, WHICH IS 11X LONGER. THIS AREA NEEDS TO
	BE EXCLUDED FROM THE PLAZA AND BECOME A COURTYARD AGAIN
	TO CORRECT THIS.

	4) PRIVATE OPEN SPACE - POOL DECK

	A. PLEASE VERIFY THAT THE BAR AREA WILL HAVE A SOLID
	ROOF. IF SO, PROVIDE INFORMATION AS TO WHAT THE
	CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS WILL BE.

	B. THE OPEN SPACE AREA NEEDS TO ENCOMPASS THE ENTIRE
	CONTIGUOUS 4TH FLOOR AMENITY AREA. YOU MAY NOT
	SELECTIVELY EXCLUDE PORTIONS IN ORDER TO REDUCE THE
	TOTAL AREA TO MEET THE LANDSCAPE MINIMUM.

	5) ACTIVE USE

	A. THE GROUND LEVEL OF THE HIBISCUS FRONTAGE SHOWS THE
	WESTERN 16 FOOT SECTION AS PART OF THE PROVIDED ACTIVE
	USE. THIS AREA MAY NOT BE INCLUDED SINCE IT DOES NOT
	HAVE THE REQUIRED 25 FOOT DEPTH.

	B. ON LEVEL 3, THERE IS A SECTION OF THE MAINTENANCE
	OFFICE THAT NEEDS TO SHOW THAT IT IS A MINIMUM OF 15
	FEET IN DEPTH. IT DOES NOT SCALE AS COMPLYING.

	C. THE ACTIVE USE LINER TABLE ON SHEET A0.01 LISTS AN
	INCORRECT DIMENSION FOR THE 3RD LEVEL ALONG HIBISCUS
	STREET. IT IS NOT 182.75 FEET.

	6) THE PARKING GARAGE DRAWINGS SHOW THE GARAGE ENTRANCE
	AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE GARAGE AT THE LOCATION
	WHERE IT CROSSES THE CITYPLACE TOWNHOUSE POA PROPERTY.
	PROVIDE RECORDED DOCUMENTATION FROM THE POA THAT YOU
	ARE PERMITTED TO USE THEIR PROPERTY TO ACCESS THE
	GARAGE OR THIS MAY NOT CHANGE FROM THE LAYOUT APPROVED
	AS PART OF RESOLUTION NO. 362-19. THE PARKING NUMBERS
	NEED TO REFLECT THE FINAL CONFIGURATION.

	7) RESIDENTIAL BICYCLE PARKING

	A. THE BICYCLE PARKING CALCULATIONS ROUND UP, SO THE
	362 UNITS REQUIRE 37, NOT 36 PARKING SPACES. YOU ARE
	PROVIDING 38 SPACES, SO THIS JUST NEEDS TO BE UPDATED
	ON THE RESIDENTIAL TABLE.

	B. THE RESIDENTIAL BICYCLE ROOM SHOWS THREE SPACES THAT
	DO NOT FUNCTION DUE TO THE PROXIMITY TO THE WALL AND
	THE ACCESS PATH. THESE THREE SPACES EXCEED THE 38
	PARKING SPACES THAT ARE PROVIDED AND NEED TO BE
	REMOVED.

	8) SHEET A0.01.1 EAST ELEVATION DIAGRAM INCLUDES LABELS
	FOR AREAS E AND F. THESE TWO AREAS DO NOT APPEAR IN THE
	SAME LOCATION/CONFIGURATION ON THE EAST ELEVATION.
	PLEASE CLARIFY.

	9) THE ELEVATION MEASURE TO THE TOP OF THE HIGH ROOF ON
	THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS DOES NOT MATCH THE ELEVATION TAG
	ON THE HIGH ROOF PLAN (SHEET A1.07).

	10) THE SOUTH ELEVATION DRAWINGS SHOW THAT THE UNITS ON
	THE 5TH LEVEL HAVE BALCONY SLIDER DOORS OVERLOOKING THE
	PODIUM ROOF. THIS GLAZING MAY NOT OPEN TO ACCESS THE
	ROOF, SINCE THE ROOF IS NOT PERMITTED TO HAVE RAILING
	AS IT WOULD EXCEED THE PODIUM HEIGHT. PLEASE CORRECT SO
	THAT THE ACCURATE CONDITIONS ARE SHOWN.

	11) PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE CITYPLACE DRI, REQUIRES
	THAT ALL ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT BE SCREENED FROM
	PUBLIC VIEW. YOU NEED TO PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THIS
	REQUIREMENT IS MET.

	A. PROVIDE THE ANTICIPATED HEIGHT OF THE RESIDENTIAL
	CONDENSING UNITS (WITH CURB) AND THE HEIGHT OF THE
	PARAPET WALL AROUND THE CONDENSING UNITS. THIS
	DIMENSION TAG NEEDS TO BE ON BOTH THE ROOF PLAN AND THE
	ELEVATION DRAWINGS.

	B. THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS NEED TO SHOW ALL THE ROOFTOP
	FEATURES. THERE ARE MESH LOOKING FEATURES ON EITHER END
	OF THE MAIN ROOF PLAN WHICH DO NOT SHOW ON THE
	ELEVATIONS AND NEED TO BE EXPLAINED AND LABELED.
	ADDITIONALLY, THERE ARE TWO OTHER ROOFTOP FEATURES THAT
	ARE NOT LABELED OR SHOWN ON THE ELEVATIONS (LOOK LIKE
	GENERATORS ON THE PLAN), WHICH NEED TO BE EXPLAINED.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	03-09-2020			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	03-09-2020	Time	15:49	Rev Time	1.50
Received By	eschneid			Date	03-09-2020	Time	15:04	Sent To

Notes

2020-03-09 15:50:47	CASE NO. PB 950XXXXX
	575 S. ROSEMARY REDEVELOPMENT
	575 S. ROSEMARY

	- CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,
	[email protected]

	- PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	- WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR
	(4) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT
	OF ALL PLANS.

	1) ZONING STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED
	AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION AN NOTED THAT IT DOES NOT
	INCLUDE ALL OF THE INFORMATION THAT STAFF NEEDS FOR THE
	REVIEW AND AMENDED PLANS THAT WERE APPROVED AS PART OF
	RESOLUTION NO. 362-19.

	2) THE FOLLOWING PLAN SHEETS SHOWING THE PROPOSED
	BUILDING DESIGN ARE REQUIRED:

	SHEET A0.01 - SITE/PROJECT DATA
	SHEETS A0.01.1 AND A0.01.2 - FACADE CALCULATIONS
	SHEET A0.04.2 - SITE PLAN
	SHEET A0.05 - OPEN SPACE DIAGRAMS
	SHEET A0.06 - ACTIVE USE DIAGRAMS
	SHEETS A0.07, A0.08, A0.09, A0.09.1 AND A0.10 - VARIOUS
	SF VERIFICATION DIAGRAMS
	SHEETS A1.01, A1.02, A1.03, A1.04, A1.04A, A1.05,
	A1.06, A1.07 AND A1.09 - FLOOR PLAN DIAGRAMS
	SHEETS A2.00.2, A2.01.2, A2.02.2 AND A2.03.2 -
	ELEVATIONS
	SHEETS LH-01 AND LH-02 - HARDSCAPE PLANS
	SHEETS LP-01, LP-02, LP-03, LP-04, LP-05 AND LP-06

	3) ALL CODE REQUIRED DATA NEEDS TO BE UPDATED - ACTIVE
	USE, PARKING COUNTS, PUBLIC/PRIVATE OPEN SPACE, ETC.

	4) THE UNIT B1.4 BALCONY APPEARS TO ENCROACH ON THE
	ACCESS EASEMENT SETBACK (SHEET A1.09).

	5) UPDATED OVERALL ROSEMARY SQUARE PARKING AVAILABILITY
	TABLE REFLECTING THE NEW, REDUCED PARKING REQUIREMENT.
	THIS CAN ALSO INCLUDE THE NEW SPACES DEDICATED TO THE
	CAR DEALER IN B GARAGE.

	6) THERE IS A DISCREPANCY IN THE AMOUNT OF CHANGE
	BETWEEN THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDING SQUARE
	FOOTAGE. THE FOOTPRINT COMPARISON DONE BY LEO DALY
	SHOWS 3,195 LESS SQUARE FEET IN THE NEW BUILDING WHILE
	THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT SHOWS 1,620 ADDITIONAL
	SQUARE FEET. THE REQUIRED DRAWINGS WILL ALLOW STAFF TO
	SORT OUT THE DIFFERENCES AND VERIFY IF THERE IS AN
	INCREASE IN SQUARE FOOTAGE. NOTE: IF THERE IS AN
	ADDITION OF MORE THAN 1,000 SQUARE FEET, WHILE NOT
	TRIGGERING THE THRESHOLD OF A LEVEL III SITE PLAN
	REVIEW, IT TRIGGERS A LEVEL II SITE PLAN REVIEW, WHICH
	IS HAS A $1,500 FEE, THOUGH DUE TO THE NATURE OF THE
	CHANGES NO ENGINEERING FEE IS REQUIRED. THE PLANS WILL
	BE REVIEWED BY LANDSCAPE, BUILDING AND FIRE. PLEASE
	HOLD OFF ON PAYMENT UNTIL STAFF HAS DETERMINED IF THE
	ADDITIONAL FEE IS REQUIRED.