 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z20020009
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z20020009 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-11-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
03-11-2020 |
Time |
20:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
03-11-2020 |
Time |
20:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-03-11 20:10:42 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. THE ADDITION TO THE EXISTING BUILDING IS COVERED BY | | | CHAPTER 11 OF THE FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING CODE. THE | | | HEIGHT AND/OR AREA INCREASE DUE TO THE PROPOSED | | | ADDITION SHALL NOT INCREASE THE TOTAL BUILDING HEIGHT | | | AND/OR AREA BEYOND THAT ALLOWED UNDER THE APPLICABLE | | | PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | FOR THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION USED. | | | | | | 3. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, | | | FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, | | | GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, | | | SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 4. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER | | | AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY, | | | INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE | | | CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION | | | THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY. | | | | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
04-04-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
04-04-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
04-04-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-04-04 09:08:04 | PASSED WITH PROVISOS: | | | | | | -DID NOT SEE LANDSCAPING PLAN IN RESUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS | | | ? PLEASE VERIFY TREES HAVE SUFFICIENT CLEARANCE | | | DISTANCE FROM WATER UTILITIES. | | | | | | -BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES MAY NOT BE LOCATED IN UTILITY | | | EASEMENTS. THERE ARE SEVERAL CASES OF THAT CONFLICT ON | | | WATER PLAN. | | | | | | -RELOCATION OF PROPOSED IRRIGATION METER WILL BE | | | REVIEWED AT FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL TO DETERMINE | | | IF NEW TAP WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | | | | -DOMESTIC AND IRRIGATION METERS MAY NOT BE USED TO | | | PROVIDE WATER FOR FIRE SPRINKLERS. SEPARATE DEDICATED | | | FIRE SERVICE LINE WITH DETECTOR METER IS NEEDED. | | | | | | -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL: 1) ADD PIPE MATERIAL | | | TYPE TO LABEL FOR NEW 2 INCH WATER SERVICE. 2) ADD | | | LABEL TO EXISTING WATER SERVICE FOR 1 METER WITH PIPE | | | SIZE AND MATERIAL TYPE. | | | | | | RESPECTFULLY, | | | | | | MARK HURLEY | | | FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC UTILITIES | | | 561-822-2262 | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-24-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
03-24-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
03-24-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-24 13:52:16 | THERE ARE NO RESPONSES TO OUR PREVIOUS ENGINEERING | | | COMMENTS. PLEASE ADDRESS PREVIOUSLY UNADDRESSED | | | ENGINEERING COMMENTS AND PROVIDE UPDATED ENGINEERING | | | PLANS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-31-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
12-31-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
12-31-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-12-31 12:44:25 | 1. PLEASE ADDRESS PRIOR COMMENTS 2 THROUGH 11. | | | 2. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS. | | | 3. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION OF WATER | | | METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION. | | | 4. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES | | | OF WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS. | | | 5. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING | | | APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT | | | SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING | | | SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED | | | LEAD-FREE DESIGN. | | | 6. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL CLEARLY LABEL ROAD | | | RIGHT OF WAY. | | | 7. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO | | | PROVIDE 50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH | | | SIDE OF PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY | | | AREAS PER CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-9. | | | 8. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SHOW WATER TAP | | | STRAIGHT ON TO PROPERTY FROM CITY WATER MAIN. | | | 9. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, LIST WATER, SEWER | | | AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS ON DRAWINGS. | | | 10. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE SHOW BOTH | | | EXISTING AND PROPOSED PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS ON | | | PLANS. | | | 11. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, UPDATE ALL CITY | | | OF WPB STANDARD DETAILS TO MOST CURRENT VERSIONS. | | | 12. PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING. | | | 13. PLEASE LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE | | | APPLICABLE. | | | 14. PLEASE PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED | | | LOCATION OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION. | | | 15. PLEASE UPDATE PAVEMENT RESTORATION NOTE TO COMPLY | | | WITH CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8. | | | 16. COORDINATE WITH MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE | | | SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING | | | PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT | | | HIM AT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected] | | | 17. PROVIDE DEDICATED UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS | | | FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. | | | | | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | CONCERNS, THANKS. RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT (561) 494-1098 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD | | | CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, | | | PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]: | | | PLEASE CONFIRM PRIOR COMMENTS WERE ADDRESSED: | | | PROPOSED TREE INSTALLATIONS SHOULD NOT BE WITHIN 5 FEET | | | OF WATER UTILITIES. | | | SHEET C-1: | | | -CANNOT HAVE WATER METER BOX OR BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY IN | | | DRIVEWAY. METER BOX, WATER SERVICE, AND BACKFLOW | | | ASSEMBLIES WOULD NEED TO BE RELOCATED, OR PLAN DESIGN | | | CHANGED TO RELOCATE DRIVEWAY , IN ORDER TO ELIMINATE | | | THAT CONFLICT. IF RELOCATING WATER SERVICE, METER BOX | | | SHOULD NOT BE IN A SIDEWALK. | | | -NEED LABEL SIZE OF EXISTING METER, WATER SERVICE, & | | | BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY. | | | -EXISTING & PROPOSED WATER MAINS, METER BOXES, AND | | | WATER SERVICE PIPE ON PROPERTY NEEDS TO BE IN UTILITY | | | EASEMENTS. NOT SURE IF EXISTING WATER MAINS NEAR SOUTH | | | SIDE AND EAST SIDE ARE ALREADY IN UTILITY EASEMENTS, OR | | | IF THOSE NEED TO BE GRANTED WITH THE PROJECT. PROPERTY | | | OWNER SHOULD NOT BUILD WITHIN UTILITY EASEMENT. ALONG | | | EAST SIDE OF PROPERTY, THERE IS SOME PARKING LOT AND | | | DUMPSTER AREA STRUCTURE THAT LOOKS LIKE IT WOULD | | | INTRUDE INTO UTILITY EASEMENT ? IF THEY ARE PROPOSED | | | AND NOT EXISTING THEY SHOULD BE RELOCATED. | | | -NOT SURE IF THERE IS A STREET OR ANOTHER PROPERTY | | | ALONG SOUTH PROPERTY LINE ? CAN THAT BE ADDED? | | | -PLAN SAYS ASPHALT TO BE REMOVED AROUND AREA FROM | | | PROPOSED 2? METER BOX, BUT IT DOES NOT SAY THE NEW | | | SURFACE. REQUEST NOTATION SAYING NEW MATERIAL. PREFER | | | GRASS AROUND METER BOXES. | | | -HARD TO DETERMINE SURFACE OVER 2? TAP. REQUEST LABEL | | | SHOWING IF THAT IS GRASS PARKWAY OR CONCRETE SIDEWALK. | | | -DID NOT SEE A DEDICATED FIRELINE SERVICE. WILL THE | | | BUILDING HAVE FIRE SPRINKLERS? | | | -DID NOT SEE A FIRE HYDRANT ADJACENT PROPERTY. IS A | | | FIRE HYDRANT REQUIRED TO BE ADJACENT PROPERTY? | | | -DID NOT SEE WATER DEMAND CHART ? NEED ADD IT. | | | -RECOMMEND DUAL/PARALLEL BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ON | | | DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE SO RESTAURANT HAS WATER DURING | | | BACKFLOW MAINTENANCE OR REPAIRS. | | | -IF EXISTING BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ARE RELOCATED, THEY | | | WOULD NEED TO BE REPLACED WITH NEW LEAD-FREE COMPLIANT | | | BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES AND UNDERGO INSPECTION. | | | SHEET C-4: | | | -WATER SERVICE DETAILS ARE OLD ? SHOULD UPDATE TO | | | NEWEST REVISION. | | | NEW COMMENTS AS FOLLOWS: | | | -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, METER BOXES ON | | | PRIVATE PROPERTY NEED TO BE IN UTILITY EASEMENTS. | | | SOUTHERN METER BOX MAY BE ADJUSTED SLIGHTLY SOUTH TO | | | FALL WITHIN PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT. | | | -WATER SERVICE TAP UNDER SIDEWALK WOULD LIKELY REQUIRE | | | SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT. | | | -DID NOT RECEIVE WRITTEN RESPONSES BACK FROM PRIOR | | | COMMENTS IN MARCH2020. MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS | | | DEPENDING ON RESPONSES. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-05-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
03-05-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
03-05-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-03-05 11:32:15 | 1. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS. | | | 2. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION OF WATER | | | METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION. | | | 3. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES | | | OF WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS. | | | 4. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING | | | APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT | | | SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING | | | SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED | | | LEAD-FREE DESIGN. | | | 5. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL CLEARLY LABEL ROAD | | | RIGHT OF WAY. | | | 6. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS. | | | 7. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO | | | PROVIDE 50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH | | | SIDE OF PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY | | | AREAS PER CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-9. | | | 8. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SHOW WATER TAP | | | STRAIGHT ON TO PROPERTY FROM CITY WATER MAIN. | | | 9. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, LIST WATER, SEWER | | | AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS ON DRAWINGS. | | | 10. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE SHOW BOTH | | | EXISTING AND PROPOSED PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS ON | | | PLANS. | | | 11. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, UPDATE ALL CITY | | | OF WPB STANDARD DETAILS TO MOST CURRENT VERSIONS. | | | 12. PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING. | | | | | | FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER | | | SERVICE SUPERVISOR | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-822-2262, | | | [email protected] | | | | | | -PROPOSED TREE INSTALLATIONS SHOULD NOT BE WITHIN 5 | | | FEET OF WATER UTILITIES. | | | | | | SHEET C-1 | | | -CANNOT HAVE WATER METER BOX OR BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY IN | | | DRIVEWAY. METER BOX, WATER SERVICE, AND BACKFLOW | | | ASSEMBLIES WOULD NEED TO BE RELOCATED, OR PLAN DESIGN | | | CHANGED TO RELOCATE DRIVEWAY , IN ORDER TO ELIMINATE | | | THAT CONFLICT. IF RELOCATING WATER SERVICE, METER BOX | | | SHOULD NOT BE IN A SIDEWALK. | | | -NEED LABEL SIZE OF EXISTING METER, WATER SERVICE, & | | | BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY. | | | -EXISTING & PROPOSED WATER MAINS, METER BOXES, AND | | | WATER SERVICE PIPE ON PROPERTY NEEDS TO BE IN UTILITY | | | EASEMENTS. NOT SURE IF EXISTING WATER MAINS NEAR SOUTH | | | SIDE AND EAST SIDE ARE ALREADY IN UTILITY EASEMENTS, OR | | | IF THOSE NEED TO BE GRANTED WITH THE PROJECT. PROPERTY | | | OWNER SHOULD NOT BUILD WITHIN UTILITY EASEMENT. ALONG | | | EAST SIDE OF PROPERTY, THERE IS SOME PARKING LOT AND | | | DUMPSTER AREA STRUCTURE THAT LOOKS LIKE IT WOULD | | | INTRUDE INTO UTILITY EASEMENT ? IF THEY ARE PROPOSED | | | AND NOT EXISTING THEY SHOULD BE RELOCATED. | | | -NOT SURE IF THERE IS A STREET OR ANOTHER PROPERTY | | | ALONG SOUTH PROPERTY LINE ? CAN THAT BE ADDED? | | | -PLAN SAYS ASPHALT TO BE REMOVED AROUND AREA FROM | | | PROPOSED 2 IN. METER BOX, BUT IT DOES NOT SAY THE NEW | | | SURFACE. REQUEST NOTATION SAYING NEW MATERIAL. PREFER | | | GRASS AROUND METER BOXES. | | | -HARD TO DETERMINE SURFACE OVER 2 IN. TAP. REQUEST | | | LABEL SHOWING IF THAT IS GRASS PARKWAY OR CONCRETE | | | SIDEWALK. | | | -DID NOT SEE A DEDICATED FIRELINE SERVICE. WILL THE | | | BUILDING HAVE FIRE SPRINKLERS? | | | -DID NOT SEE A FIRE HYDRANT ADJACENT PROPERTY. IS A | | | FIRE HYDRANT REQUIRED TO BE ADJACENT PROPERTY? | | | -DID NOT SEE WATER DEMAND CHART ? NEED ADD IT. | | | -RECOMMEND DUAL/PARALLEL BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ON | | | DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE SO RESTAURANT HAS WATER DURING | | | BACKFLOW MAINTENANCE OR REPAIRS. | | | -IF EXISTING BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ARE RELOCATED, THEY | | | WOULD NEED TO BE REPLACED WITH NEW LEAD-FREE COMPLIANT | | | BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES AND UNDERGO INSPECTION. | | | | | | SHEET C-4 | | | --WATER SERVICE DETAILS ARE OLD ? SHOULD UPDATE TO | | | NEWEST REVISION. | | | | | | | | | RICK ROSSANO | | | PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 | | | MOBILE: (561) 246-9525 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-06-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
03-06-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
03-06-2020 |
Time |
10:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-03-06 10:57:24 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE | | | OCCUPANCY TYPE, PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE. | | | | | | THERE ARE INDICATIONS OF BBQ SMOKERS AND AN AREA THAT | | | APPEARS TO BE WOOD STORAGE. PLEASE PROVIDE MANUFACTURES | | | SPEC SHEET FOR THE SMOKERS AND WHAT TYPE OF WOOD WILL | | | BE STORED AND HOW MUCH. | | | | | | THE ARE NO SMOKER VENT STACKS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS. | | | THERE IS CONCERN OF SMOKE ENTERING THE STRUCTURE AS | | | WELL AS THE SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED HOURS OF SMOKER | | | OPERATION SMOKE MITIGATION TO AVOID CO ENTERING THE | | | BUILDING, HEALTH ISSUES AND COMPLAINTS FROM AREA | | | HOMEOWNERS AND BUSINESSES. | | | | | | 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE | | | LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER | | | SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED | | | ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | THERE WAS NO INDICATION OF THE NEAREST FIRE HYDRANT, | | | PLEASE INCLUDE IT ON ALL CIVILS. | | | | | | 9. IF APLLICABLE, PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR | | | FIRE ALARM PER THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY | | | LIFE SAFETY ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND | | | FIRE ALARM, ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | FS 61G AND SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PERMIT. | | | | | | 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR THE OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE | | | SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY | | | DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS. | | | | | | 12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
04-29-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
04-29-2021 |
Time |
10:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
04-29-2021 |
Time |
10:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-04-29 10:05:42 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 2400 S DIXIE Z20020009 | | | APRIL 29, 2021 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION CHART OF THE | | | TREES WITHIN THE AFFECTED AREA AND INDICATE IF THEY | | | WILL BE PRESERVED IN PLACE, RELOCATED OR REMOVED. LIST | | | THE BOTANICAL NAME AND PROVIDE THE CANOPY DIAMETER. | | | CALCULATE THE REQUIRED MITIGATION IN SQUARE FOOTAGE. | | | ? SATISFIED. SHOW CALCULATIONS FOR CANOPY SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE BASED ON DIAMETER, 1:1 SAME CATEGORY IF UNDER | | | 20 FEET, ACTUAL AREA 20 FEET OR MORE WITHIN THE | | | DISPOSITION CHART. | | | FICUS BENJAMINA DO NOT REQUIRE MITIGATION, AS THEY ARE | | | UNMAINTAINED HEDGES, NOT TREES. CRAPE MYRTLE ARE | | | CATEGORY 3 AT 100 SQ FT MITIGATION DUE EACH. SABAL PALM | | | IS CATEGORY 3 AT 100 SQ FT ALSO. | | | | | | ? SATISFIED. ADD THE SUM OF ALL TREE CANOPY MITIGATION | | | TO SHOW THE TOTAL MITIGATION DUE. | | | RECALCULATE BASED ON NEW MITIGATION FIGURES. | | | | | | ? SATISFIED. SHOW THE MITIGATION PROVIDED CALCULATION | | | FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED WITH THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR MINIMUM SHADE | | | TREE AND FLOWERING TREE REQUIREMENTS PER SECTION | | | 94-443(C)(2)B. BASED ON REQUIRED OPEN SPACE OF 40%. | | | THIS SHOULD BE 11,392 SQ FT. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TERMINAL ISLANDS | | | WITH FEET INTERIOR LANDSCAPE WIDTH AT THE END OF EACH | | | ROW OF PARKING. NEW PARKING MUST INCLUDE REQUIRED | | | TERMINAL ISLANDS, AND ANY INTERIOR ISLANDS THAT ARE | | | EXISTING CANNOT BE REDUCED TO BELOW REQUIRED WIDTH. | | | NEW TERMINAL ISLANDS FOR NEW PARKING SPACES DO NOT MEET | | | THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE 2 NEW SPACES WEST OF PROPOSED | | | DUMPSTER, AND SOUTH OF PROPOSED DUMPSTER. | | | | | | NEWLY CREATED PARKING SPACES ALONG THE EAST BUFFER | | | BEHIND THE BUILDING REQUIRE THE 8 FOOT LANDSCAPE AREA | | | WIDTH INCLUDING THE 5 FOOT BUFFER AT THE NORTH END OF | | | THE ROW OF PARKING, AND A LANDSCAPE TERMINAL ISLAND | | | WITH 8 FOOT WIDTH INSIDE CURB ON THE SOUTH END OF THE | | | ROW. THE ROW OF PARKING ADJACENT TO THE DUMPSTER ALSO | | | REQUIRES THE TERMINAL ISLAND. | | | | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A | | | MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO | | | BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING | | | AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE | | | PERCENTAGE OF CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR THE | | | REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING | | | LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION | | | 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF REQUIRED 5 FOOT | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ON THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN | | | PER SECTION 94-443(D). | | | | | | TWO NEW PARKING SPACES DO NOT LEAVE A 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFER BETWEEN THE PROPERTY LINE AND PROPOSED PARKING. | | | THIS ALSO DOES NOT MEET THE TERMINAL ISLAND REQUIREMENT | | | OF 8 FEET PER COMMENT #3. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. EAST BUFFER IS SHORT ON MEETING THE 9 | | | TREES REQUIRED, MAY NEED TO ADD 2 PALMS. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE HEDGES TO SCREEN ALL PARKING | | | AREAS FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND STREETS. | | | | | | INDICATE AND LABEL ANY EXISTING HEDGES TO REMAIN. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL REQUIRED CURBS ADJACENT TO | | | LANDSCAPE AREAS PER SECTION 94-443 (C)(5). THERE APPEAR | | | TO BE AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT ARE NOT SHOWING | | | CURBS TO MATCH THE SITE AND ENGINEERING PLANS. | | | CURBS ARE NOT SHOWN FOR ALL AREAS OF NEW PARKING. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL PROPOSED WATER, | | | SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. IT | | | APPEARS THAT THERE ARE CONFLICTS WITH REQUIRED TREES. | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. IDENTIFY THE OBJECT IN THE LANDSCAPE | | | ISLAND TO THE LEFT OF PROPOSED ENTRANCE FROM S DIXIE. | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. MODIFY THE PLANT LIST TO ADD COLUMNS FOR | | | NATIVE PLANT AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVELS TO PROVIDE | | | EASIER REFERENCE. | | | | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. | | | PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT | | | MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | PROVIDE THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 14. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH | | | LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 15. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DETAIL AND LOCATIONS OF ROOT | | | BARRIERS TO SEPARATE LANDSCAPING FROM UTILITY LINES. | | | | | | 16. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED | | | VALVES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | | | | 17. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING | | | ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH | | | TREES. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 1/15/21: | | | 18. SATISFIED. NORTH BUFFER HAS ONLY ONE QUALIFYING | | | SILVER BUTTONWOOD TREE, PALMS IN RIGHT OF WAY DO NOT | | | COUNT. | | | | | | 19. SATISFIED. SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN DO NOT | | | MATCH. PROBLEMS WITH SCALE ON SITE PLAN. | | | | | | 20. SATISFIED. PARKING SPACES CAN BE 16 FEET OF PAVED | | | AREA WITH A 6 INCH CURB AND OVERHANG OF 1.5 FEET THAT | | | WOULD ADD LANDSCAPE AREA AND MAY BE MORE ECONOMICAL | | | THAN THE ADDITIONAL PAVING AND REQUIRED WHEEL STOP. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 3/26/21: | | | 21. SATISFIED. THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE REQUIRES A HEDGE | | | ON THE THREE NON-ACCESS SIDES. ONLY ONE SIDE MEETS THE | | | REQUIREMENT. | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-26-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-26-2021 |
Time |
16:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-26-2021 |
Time |
16:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-26 16:07:36 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 2400 S DIXIE Z20020009 | | | MARCH 26, 2021 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION CHART OF THE | | | TREES WITHIN THE AFFECTED AREA AND INDICATE IF THEY | | | WILL BE PRESERVED IN PLACE, RELOCATED OR REMOVED. LIST | | | THE BOTANICAL NAME AND PROVIDE THE CANOPY DIAMETER. | | | CALCULATE THE REQUIRED MITIGATION IN SQUARE FOOTAGE. | | | ? SATISFIED. SHOW CALCULATIONS FOR CANOPY SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE BASED ON DIAMETER, 1:1 SAME CATEGORY IF UNDER | | | 20 FEET, ACTUAL AREA 20 FEET OR MORE WITHIN THE | | | DISPOSITION CHART. | | | FICUS BENJAMINA DO NOT REQUIRE MITIGATION, AS THEY ARE | | | UNMAINTAINED HEDGES, NOT TREES. CRAPE MYRTLE ARE | | | CATEGORY 3 AT 100 SQ FT MITIGATION DUE EACH. SABAL PALM | | | IS CATEGORY 3 AT 100 SQ FT ALSO. | | | | | | ? SATISFIED. ADD THE SUM OF ALL TREE CANOPY MITIGATION | | | TO SHOW THE TOTAL MITIGATION DUE. | | | RECALCULATE BASED ON NEW MITIGATION FIGURES. | | | | | | ? SATISFIED. SHOW THE MITIGATION PROVIDED CALCULATION | | | FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED WITH THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR MINIMUM SHADE | | | TREE AND FLOWERING TREE REQUIREMENTS PER SECTION | | | 94-443(C)(2)B. BASED ON REQUIRED OPEN SPACE OF 40%. | | | THIS SHOULD BE 11,392 SQ FT. | | | | | | 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TERMINAL | | | ISLANDS WITH FEET INTERIOR LANDSCAPE WIDTH AT THE END | | | OF EACH ROW OF PARKING. NEW PARKING MUST INCLUDE | | | REQUIRED TERMINAL ISLANDS, AND ANY INTERIOR ISLANDS | | | THAT ARE EXISTING CANNOT BE REDUCED TO BELOW REQUIRED | | | WIDTH. | | | NEW TERMINAL ISLANDS FOR NEW PARKING SPACES DO NOT MEET | | | THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE 2 NEW SPACES WEST OF PROPOSED | | | DUMPSTER, AND SOUTH OF PROPOSED DUMPSTER. | | | | | | NEWLY CREATED PARKING SPACES ALONG THE EAST BUFFER | | | BEHIND THE BUILDING REQUIRE THE 8 FOOT LANDSCAPE AREA | | | WIDTH INCLUDING THE 5 FOOT BUFFER AT THE NORTH END OF | | | THE ROW OF PARKING, AND A LANDSCAPE TERMINAL ISLAND | | | WITH 8 FOOT WIDTH INSIDE CURB ON THE SOUTH END OF THE | | | ROW. THE ROW OF PARKING ADJACENT TO THE DUMPSTER ALSO | | | REQUIRES THE TERMINAL ISLAND. | | | | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A | | | MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO | | | BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING | | | AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE | | | PERCENTAGE OF CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR THE | | | REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING | | | LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION | | | 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF REQUIRED 5 FOOT | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ON THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN | | | PER SECTION 94-443(D). | | | | | | TWO NEW PARKING SPACES DO NOT LEAVE A 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFER BETWEEN THE PROPERTY LINE AND PROPOSED PARKING. | | | THIS ALSO DOES NOT MEET THE TERMINAL ISLAND REQUIREMENT | | | OF 8 FEET PER COMMENT #3. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. EAST BUFFER IS SHORT ON MEETING THE 9 | | | TREES REQUIRED, MAY NEED TO ADD 2 PALMS. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE HEDGES TO SCREEN ALL PARKING | | | AREAS FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND STREETS. | | | | | | INDICATE AND LABEL ANY EXISTING HEDGES TO REMAIN. | | | | | | 9. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW ALL REQUIRED CURBS | | | ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPE AREAS PER SECTION 94-443 (C)(5). | | | THERE APPEAR TO BE AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT ARE | | | NOT SHOWING CURBS TO MATCH THE SITE AND ENGINEERING | | | PLANS. | | | CURBS ARE NOT SHOWN FOR ALL AREAS OF NEW PARKING. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL PROPOSED WATER, | | | SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. IT | | | APPEARS THAT THERE ARE CONFLICTS WITH REQUIRED TREES. | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. IDENTIFY THE OBJECT IN THE LANDSCAPE | | | ISLAND TO THE LEFT OF PROPOSED ENTRANCE FROM S DIXIE. | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. MODIFY THE PLANT LIST TO ADD COLUMNS FOR | | | NATIVE PLANT AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVELS TO PROVIDE | | | EASIER REFERENCE. | | | | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. | | | PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT | | | MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | PROVIDE THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 14. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH | | | LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 15. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DETAIL AND LOCATIONS OF ROOT | | | BARRIERS TO SEPARATE LANDSCAPING FROM UTILITY LINES. | | | | | | 16. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED | | | VALVES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | | | | 17. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING | | | ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH | | | TREES. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 1/15/21: | | | 18. SATISFIED. NORTH BUFFER HAS ONLY ONE QUALIFYING | | | SILVER BUTTONWOOD TREE, PALMS IN RIGHT OF WAY DO NOT | | | COUNT. | | | | | | 19. SATISFIED. SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN DO NOT | | | MATCH. PROBLEMS WITH SCALE ON SITE PLAN. | | | | | | 20. SATISFIED. PARKING SPACES CAN BE 16 FEET OF PAVED | | | AREA WITH A 6 INCH CURB AND OVERHANG OF 1.5 FEET THAT | | | WOULD ADD LANDSCAPE AREA AND MAY BE MORE ECONOMICAL | | | THAN THE ADDITIONAL PAVING AND REQUIRED WHEEL STOP. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 3/26/21: | | | 21. THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE REQUIRES A HEDGE ON THE | | | THREE NON-ACCESS SIDES. ONLY ONE SIDE MEETS THE | | | REQUIREMENT. | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-15-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
01-15-2021 |
Time |
16:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
01-15-2021 |
Time |
16:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-01-15 16:03:20 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 2400 S DIXIE Z20020009 | | | JANUARY 15, 2021 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION | | | CHART OF THE TREES WITHIN THE AFFECTED AREA AND | | | INDICATE IF THEY WILL BE PRESERVED IN PLACE, RELOCATED | | | OR REMOVED. LIST THE BOTANICAL NAME AND PROVIDE THE | | | CANOPY DIAMETER. CALCULATE THE REQUIRED MITIGATION IN | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE. | | | ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW CALCULATIONS FOR CANOPY | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED ON DIAMETER, 1:1 SAME CATEGORY IF | | | UNDER 20 FEET, ACTUAL AREA 20 FEET OR MORE WITHIN THE | | | DISPOSITION CHART. | | | FICUS BENJAMINA DO NOT REQUIRE MITIGATION, AS THEY ARE | | | UNMAINTAINED HEDGES, NOT TREES. CRAPE MYRTLE ARE | | | CATEGORY 3 AT 100 SQ FT MITIGATION DUE EACH. SABAL PALM | | | IS CATEGORY 3 AT 100 SQ FT ALSO. | | | | | | ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ADD THE SUM OF ALL TREE CANOPY | | | MITIGATION TO SHOW THE TOTAL MITIGATION DUE. | | | RECALCULATE BASED ON NEW MITIGATION FIGURES. | | | | | | ? SATISFIED. SHOW THE MITIGATION PROVIDED CALCULATION | | | FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED WITH THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR MINIMUM SHADE | | | TREE AND FLOWERING TREE REQUIREMENTS PER SECTION | | | 94-443(C)(2)B. BASED ON REQUIRED OPEN SPACE OF 40%. | | | THIS SHOULD BE 11,392 SQ FT. | | | | | | 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TERMINAL | | | ISLANDS WITH FEET INTERIOR LANDSCAPE WIDTH AT THE END | | | OF EACH ROW OF PARKING. NEW PARKING MUST INCLUDE | | | REQUIRED TERMINAL ISLANDS, AND ANY INTERIOR ISLANDS | | | THAT ARE EXISTING CANNOT BE REDUCED TO BELOW REQUIRED | | | WIDTH. | | | NEW TERMINAL ISLANDS FOR NEW PARKING SPACES DO NOT MEET | | | THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE 2 NEW SPACES WEST OF PROPOSED | | | DUMPSTER, AND SOUTH OF PROPOSED DUMPSTER. | | | | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A | | | MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO | | | BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING | | | AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE | | | PERCENTAGE OF CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR THE | | | REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING | | | LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION | | | 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF REQUIRED | | | 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ON THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN PER SECTION 94-443(D). | | | | | | TWO NEW PARKING SPACES DO NOT LEAVE A 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFER BETWEEN THE PROPERTY LINE AND PROPOSED PARKING. | | | THIS ALSO DOES NOT MEET THE TERMINAL ISLAND REQUIREMENT | | | OF 8 FEET PER COMMENT #3. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. EAST BUFFER IS SHORT ON MEETING THE 9 | | | TREES REQUIRED, MAY NEED TO ADD 2 PALMS. | | | | | | 8. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE HEDGES TO SCREEN ALL | | | PARKING AREAS FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND STREETS. | | | | | | INDICATE AND LABEL ANY EXISTING HEDGES TO REMAIN. | | | | | | 9. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW ALL REQUIRED CURBS | | | ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPE AREAS PER SECTION 94-443 (C)(5). | | | THERE APPEAR TO BE AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT ARE | | | NOT SHOWING CURBS TO MATCH THE SITE AND ENGINEERING | | | PLANS. | | | CURBS ARE NOT SHOWN FOR ALL AREAS OF NEW PARKING. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL PROPOSED WATER, | | | SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. IT | | | APPEARS THAT THERE ARE CONFLICTS WITH REQUIRED TREES. | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. IDENTIFY THE OBJECT IN THE LANDSCAPE | | | ISLAND TO THE LEFT OF PROPOSED ENTRANCE FROM S DIXIE. | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. MODIFY THE PLANT LIST TO ADD COLUMNS FOR | | | NATIVE PLANT AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVELS TO PROVIDE | | | EASIER REFERENCE. | | | | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. | | | PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT | | | MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | PROVIDE THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 14. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH | | | LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 15. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DETAIL AND LOCATIONS OF ROOT | | | BARRIERS TO SEPARATE LANDSCAPING FROM UTILITY LINES. | | | | | | 16. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED | | | VALVES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | | | | 17. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING | | | ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH | | | TREES. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 1/15/21: | | | 18. NORTH BUFFER HAS ONLY ONE QUALIFYING SILVER | | | BUTTONWOOD TREE, PALMS IN RIGHT OF WAY DO NOT COUNT. | | | | | | 19. SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN DO NOT MATCH. PROBLEMS | | | WITH SCALE ON SITE PLAN. | | | | | | 20. PARKING SPACES CAN BE 16 FEET OF PAVED AREA WITH A | | | 6 INCH CURB AND OVERHANG OF 1.5 FEET THAT WOULD ADD | | | LANDSCAPE AREA AND MAY BE MORE ECONOMICAL THAN THE | | | ADDITIONAL PAVING AND REQUIRED WHEEL STOP. | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-11-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-11-2020 |
Time |
11:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-11-2020 |
Time |
11:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-03-11 11:46:03 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 2400 S DIXIE Z20020009 | | | MARCH 11, 2020 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION CHART OF THE TREES WITHIN | | | THE AFFECTED AREA AND INDICATE IF THEY WILL BE | | | PRESERVED IN PLACE, RELOCATED OR REMOVED. LIST THE | | | BOTANICAL NAME AND PROVIDE THE CANOPY DIAMETER. | | | CALCULATE THE REQUIRED MITIGATION IN SQUARE FOOTAGE. | | | ? SHOW CALCULATIONS FOR CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED ON | | | DIAMETER, 1:1 SAME CATEGORY IF UNDER 20 FEET, ACTUAL | | | AREA 20 FEET OR MORE WITHIN THE DISPOSITION CHART. | | | ? ADD THE SUM OF ALL TREE CANOPY MITIGATION TO SHOW THE | | | TOTAL MITIGATION DUE. | | | ? SHOW THE MITIGATION PROVIDED CALCULATION FOR ALL | | | TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED WITH THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 2. SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR MINIMUM SHADE TREE AND | | | FLOWERING TREE REQUIREMENTS PER SECTION 94-443(C)(2)B. | | | BASED ON REQUIRED OPEN SPACE OF 40%. THIS SHOULD BE | | | 11,392 SQ FT. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TERMINAL ISLANDS WITH 8 FEET | | | INTERIOR LANDSCAPE WIDTH AT THE END OF EACH ROW OF | | | PARKING. NEW PARKING MUST INCLUDE REQUIRED TERMINAL | | | ISLANDS, AND ANY INTERIOR ISLANDS THAT ARE EXISTING | | | CANNOT BE REDUCED TO BELOW REQUIRED WIDTH. | | | | | | 4. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A MINIMUM OF 75 | | | PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED | | | WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING AREA SHALL | | | BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE OF | | | CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE | | | AREAS. | | | | | | 5. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING LANDSCAPE AREAS | | | COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-443(C)(3) AND | | | (4) AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 6. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF REQUIRED 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFERS ON THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN PER SECTION | | | 94-443(D). | | | | | | 7. EAST BUFFER IS SHORT ON MEETING THE 9 TREES | | | REQUIRED, MAY NEED TO ADD 2 PALMS. | | | | | | 8. PROVIDE HEDGES TO SCREEN ALL PARKING AREAS FROM | | | ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND STREETS. | | | | | | 9. SHOW ALL REQUIRED CURBS ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPE AREAS | | | PER SECTION 94-443 (C)(5). THERE APPEAR TO BE AREAS ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT ARE NOT SHOWING CURBS TO MATCH | | | THE SITE AND ENGINEERING PLANS. | | | | | | 10. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL PROPOSED WATER, SEWER AND | | | DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. IT APPEARS THAT | | | THERE ARE CONFLICTS WITH REQUIRED TREES. | | | | | | 11. IDENTIFY THE OBJECT IN THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND TO THE | | | LEFT OF PROPOSED ENTRANCE FROM S DIXIE. | | | | | | 12. MODIFY THE PLANT LIST TO ADD COLUMNS FOR NATIVE | | | PLANT AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVELS TO PROVIDE EASIER | | | REFERENCE. | | | | | | | | | 13. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT | | | SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL | | | ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT | | | SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF | | | SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA | | | WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA | | | LANDSCAPES. | | | PROVIDE THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 14. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS ON THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 15. PROVIDE A DETAIL AND LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO | | | SEPARATE LANDSCAPING FROM UTILITY LINES. | | | | | | 16. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED VALVES AND | | | EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | | | | 17. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH TREES. | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-12-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
03-12-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
03-12-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-12 15:52:50 | NO FURTHER COMMENTS FROM DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS. | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-31-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
12-31-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
12-31-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-12-31 13:46:30 | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | 1- REVISED ENCLOSURE SPEC. SHEETS (A002 AND C-5) TO | | | REFLECT THE CORRECT (LATEST) REVISION OF THE ENCLOSURE | | | SPECS., DATED OCTOBER 2020. FOR A FREESTANDING SITE | | | DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, THE ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE | | | LATEST REVISION OF CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL | | | CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE STANDARD, CG-8. | | | 2- AUTO TURN (DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE TIRES PATH) FOR | | | THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER TRUCK WITH THE | | | FOLLOWING SPECS: | | | - TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT | | | - TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT | | | - TURNING RADIUS: | | | - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT | | | - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT | | | - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-09-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
03-09-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
03-09-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-03-09 11:33:59 | PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | 1- REVISED ENCLOSURE SPEC. SHEETS (A002 AND C-3) TO | | | REFLECT THE CORRECT | | | REVISION OF THE ENCLOSURE SPECS. FOR A FREESTANDING | | | SITE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, THE ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY | | | WITH THE LATEST REVISION OF CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | GENERAL CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE STANDARD, CG-8. | | | 2- AUTO TURN FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER | | | TRUCK WITH THE | | | FOLLOWING SPECS: | | | - TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT | | | - TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT | | | - TURNING RADIUS: | | | - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT | | | - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT | | | - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-16-2022 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
02-16-2022 |
Time |
10:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
02-16-2022 |
Time |
11:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2022-02-16 11:21:19 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE ON THE PROPOSED DRAWINGS FOR | | | THE MINOR AMENDMENT TO THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED | | | 2/15/2022. | | | | | | 1. REVIEW PROPOSED GRADE OF 13.00 FT NAVD ADJACENT TO | | | THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND IN THE MIDDLE OF THE EAST PARKING | | | SPACES. THERE IS A PROPOSED GRADE OF 13.50 FT NAVD AT | | | THE NOSE OF THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND. | | | | | | 2. SUGGEST GRADING HANDICAP ACCESS ISLAND BEHIND THE | | | DUMPSTER TO NOT DRAIN TO THE DUMSPSTER PAD. | | | | | | 3. PEDESTRIAN CROSSING FOR EAST HANDICAP PARKING SPACE | | | MAY NOT BE PERMISSABLE BECAUSE IT IS LOCATED BEHIND A | | | PARKING SPACE. CHECK WITH THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. | | | | | | 4. WHY THE CURVY CURBING BETWEEN THE DUMPSTER AND | | | PARKING BEHIND THE BUILDING. | | | | | | 5. LIGHT POLES SHOULD NOT BE PLACED WITHIN THE 2-FOOT | | | LANDSCAPE OVERHANG OF PARKING SPACES. | | | | | | ***** THESE COMMENTS WERE COPIED OVER TO Z22020030. | | | ***** | | | | | | TRACY WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-18-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
05-18-2021 |
Time |
14:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
05-18-2021 |
Time |
14:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-03-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
05-03-2021 |
Time |
18:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
05-03-2021 |
Time |
21:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-05-03 21:30:17 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | 4/21/2021 AND 4/26/2021 SUBMITTALS. | | | | | | | | | 1. [SATISFIED] LANDSCAPE PLANS WERE NOT PROVIDED | | | PREVIOUS COMMENT:THE ENGINEERING AND LANDSCAPE PLANS DO | | | NOT MATCH THE SITE PLAN. | | | | | | 2. [SATISFIED] ADD FLOW ARROWS TO THE ENGINEERING PLAN | | | TO SHOW SURFACE WATER RUNOFF DIRECTION. | | | | | | 3. [SATISFIED] AVOID PUTTING UTILITIES UNDER LANDSCAPE | | | ISLANDS. | | | | | | 4. [SATISFIED] TWO FOOT OVERHANG WITH 16-FOOT DEEP | | | PARKING SPACES SHOWN ON WEST SIDE OT PARKING LOT. | | | 18-FOOT LONG SPACES SHOWN FOR PARKING SPACES ON EAST | | | SIDE OF PARKING LOT. THE EAST SIDE PARKING SPACES COULD | | | BE REDUCED BY TWO FEET TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE TWO | | | -FOOT LANDSCAPE OVERHANG. PREVIOUS COMMENT: CONSIDER | | | CREATING 2 FOOT OVERHANGS INTO LANDSCAPE AREAS FOR | | | PARKING SPACES. TWO-FOOT OVERHANG NO LONGER SHOWN ON | | | SITE PLAN. PAVED AREA OF PARKING SPACES ARE DIMENSIONED | | | AS 18' LONG. | | | | | | 5. [SATISFIED] CATCH BASIN GRATE ELEVATIONS APPEAR TO | | | BE HIGHER THAN SOME ADJACENT PARKING LOT GRADES. | | | | | | 6. [SATISFIED] THE TRAVEL LANE SPACE BETWEEN THE | | | LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN APPEARS TOO | | | NARROW FOR TWO WAY TRAFFIC. | | | | | | 7. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE BOTTOM ELEVATION OF EXISTING | | | ONSITE DRAINAGE STRUCTURES THAT ARE TO REMAIN. [ALL | | | EXISTING STRUCTURES ARE BEING REMOVED] | | | | | | 8. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] CHECK WITH RAY CRANCI, | | | LANDSCAPE PLANNER ON WHERE ADDITIONAL CURBING MAY BE | | | NEEDED FOR LANDSCAPE AREAS. PREVIOUS COMMENT: CURBING | | | NEEDED FOR NARROW PARKING AREAS NORTH OF THE LANDSCAPE | | | ISLANDS. [CURBING SHOWN ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN] | | | | | | 9. [NOT SATISFIED] SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLANS TO VERIFY NO CONFLICTS WITH THE PLANTING PLAN AND | | | TO IDENTIFY WHERE ROOT BARRIERS MAY BE NEEDED. | | | PREVIOOUS COMMENTS: LANDSCAPE PLANS NOT INCLUDED IN | | | THESE SUBMITTALS. SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 10. [NOT SATISFIED] LANDSCPAE PLANS NOT PROVIDED IN | | | THESE SUBMITTALS. PREVKIOUS COMMENT: SCALES SHOULD | | | MATCH FOR SURVEY, ENGINEERING PLANS AND LANDSCAPE | | | PLANS. | | | | | | 11. SHEET A001 PROPOSED SITE PLAN | | | A. [NOT SATISFIED] THE INCORRECT FLOOD ZONE IS NOW | | | SHOWN ON SHEET A000. PREVIOUS COMMENT: UPDATE THE FLOOD | | | ZONE INFORMATION (SEE THE BOUNDARY SURVEY). | | | B. [SATISFIED] A STANDARD PARKING SPACE IS 8.5' X 18'. | | | B.1. [NOT SATISFIED] THE STRIPING FOR PARKING SPACES | | | APPEAR TO BE LONGER THAN THAN THE PARKING SPACE DEPTHS | | | (16 FEET OR 18 FEET) . | | | B.2. [SATISFIED] THERE IS THE OPPORTUNITY TO REDUCE THE | | | AMOUNT OF ASPHALT AND PARKING LOT RECONSTRUCTION BY | | | REDUCING THE LENGTH OF THE PARKING SPACES BY 2 FEET, | | | INCREASING THE LANDSCAPING BY TWO FEET, REDUCE THE | | | MOUNT OF STORMWATER RUNOFF AND PERHAPS REPLACING THE | | | WHEEL STOPS FITH TYPE 'D' CURB. PREVIOUS COMMENT: THERE | | | IS 2' PARKING OVERLAP WITH LANDSCAPING CALLED OUT FOR | | | THE TEN PARKING SPACES ALONG THE BACK OF THE PARKING | | | LOT. THESE PARKING SPACES ARE SHOWN TO BE 18 FEET LONG | | | SO THE OVERLAP IS NOT REQUIRED. | | | B.3. [NOT SATISFIED - OPTIONAL]THE DRIVE AISLE IS | | | DIMENSIONED TO BE 26' 6.5" WIDE. IT CAN BE NARROWED TO | | | 24 FEET. CONSIDERING THIS NARROWING AND PROVIDING THE | | | 2' PARKING OVERLAP CAN MOVE THE EAST EDGE OF THE | | | PARKING LOT TO THE WEST BY MORE THAN 4.5 FEET. | | | C. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE THE VERTICAL DATUM FOR THE | | | FFE. IT SHOULD MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE ENGINEERING | | | PLAN. | | | D. [NOT SATISFIED] SHOW STOP BARS AND STOP SIGNS. | | | E. [NOT SATISFIED] SHOW PARALLEL PARKING SPACES | | | (STRIPING) ALONG S. DIXIE HWY. | | | | | | 12. SHEET C-1 SITE PAVING & DRAINAGE PLAN | | | A. [SATISFIED] REPLACE THE DROP CURB WITH TYPE 'F' CURB | | | AND GUTTER IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING ALONG S. DIXIE HWY. | | | B. [SATISFIED] REPLACE THE SIDEWALK WITH 6" THICK | | | SIDEWALK WHERE THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY IS BEING WIDENED. | | | C. [SATISFIED] LABEL THE SLAB FOR THE BICYCLE RACK. | | | D. [SATISFIED]LABEL THE LEFT PROPOSED WALKWAY IN FRONT | | | OF THE BUILDING. | | | E. [SATISFIED] CONNECT THE ROOF DRAIN(S) FOR THE | | | PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION TO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. (CAN | | | BE SHOWN AT TIME OF ENGINEERING PERMIT). | | | | | | 13. [SATISFIED] SHEET C-3 PGD NOTES AND DETAILS - | | | INVERT ELEVATION OF PIPE SHOWN IN THE EXFILTRATION | | | TRENCH DETAIL DOES NOT MATCH THE INVERT ELEVATIONS | | | SHOWN ON SHEET C-1. | | | | | | 14. [SATISFIED] SHEET EC-1 SWPPP - SHOW BMPS FOR | | | OFFSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS. | | | | | | 15. SHEET A002 PARKING STALL STRIPING DETAIL: | | | A. [SATISFIED] WHEEL STOPS ARE GENERALLY 2 FEET FROM | | | THE END OF PARKING STALL. | | | B. [NOT SATISFIED] GRADES SHOWN FOR HANDICAPP PARKING | | | SPACE WOULD RESULT IN A FLAT (NO SLOPE) PARKING AREA | | | AND STORMWATER RUNOFF WOULD NOT DRAIN OFF. GRADES ARE | | | SHOWN ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN. LABEL THE VERTICAL DATUM | | | ON SHEET A002. | | | | | | 16. [NOT SATISFIED] FDOT APPROVAL WILL BE NEEDED BEFORE | | | ENGINEERING PERMIT. PREVIOUS COMMENT: S. DIXIE HWY IS | | | MAINTAINED BY FDOT. FDOT'S APPROVAL FOR WORK WITHIN THE | | | RIGHT OF WAY WILL BE NEEDED. | | | | | | 17. [SATISFIED] STOP SIGNS AND STOP BARS WILL BE NEEDED | | | AT THE DRIVEWAY ENTRANCES.[CAN BE PROVIDED WITH | | | ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL] | | | | | | 18. [NOT SATISFIED] SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED PARKING | | | ALONG S. DIXIE HWY. THE RESTRICTIVE PARKING SIGNS WILL | | | NEED TO BE RELOCATED. | | | | | | 19. NEW COMMENT] CIVIL PLANS SHOW A TYPE 'D' CURB ALONG | | | THE BACK OF THE BUILDING. THE TOP OF CURB WILL BE | | | ELEVATION 14.00 FEET NAVD, WHICH IS HIGHER THAN THE | | | FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION OF 13.85 FEET NAVD. SHEET A102 | | | SHOWS SEVERAL DOORS OPENING OUT, WHICH WILL CONFLICT | | | WITH THE CURB. ONE DOOR IS SHOWN TO BE FLUSH WITH THE | | | ADJACENT PAVEMENT. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 (O) | | | 561-351-0510 (M) | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-06-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
04-06-2021 |
Time |
18:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
04-06-2021 |
Time |
20:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-04-06 20:33:56 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | 3/9/2021 AND 3/12/2021 SUBMITTALS. | | | | | | | | | 1. [NOT SATISFIED] LANDSCAPE PLANS WERE NOT PROVIDED | | | PREVIOUS COMMENT:THE ENGINEERING AND LANDSCAPE PLANS DO | | | NOT MATCH THE SITE PLAN. | | | | | | 2. [SATISFIED] ADD FLOW ARROWS TO THE ENGINEERING PLAN | | | TO SHOW SURFACE WATER RUNOFF DIRECTION. | | | | | | 3. [SATISFIED] AVOID PUTTING UTILITIES UNDER LANDSCAPE | | | ISLANDS. | | | | | | 4. NOT SATISFIED - OPTIONAL] CONSIDER CREATING 2 FOOT | | | OVERHANGS INTO LANDSCAPE AREAS FOR PARKING SPACES. | | | TWO-FOOT OVERHANG NO LONGER SHOWN ON SITE PLAN. PAVED | | | AREA OF PARKING SPACES ARE DIMENSIONED AS 18' LONG. | | | | | | 5. [SATISFIED] CATCH BASIN GRATE ELEVATIONS APPEAR TO | | | BE HIGHER THAN SOME ADJACENT PARKING LOT GRADES. | | | | | | 6. [SATISFIED] THE TRAVEL LANE SPACE BETWEEN THE | | | LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN APPEARS TOO | | | NARROW FOR TWO WAY TRAFFIC. | | | | | | 7. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE BOTTOM ELEVATION OF EXISTING | | | ONSITE DRAINAGE STRUCTURES THAT ARE TO REMAIN. [ALL | | | EXISTING STRUCTURES ARE BEING REMOVED] | | | | | | 8. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] CHECK WITH RAY CRANCI, | | | LANDSCAPE PLANNER ON WHERE ADDITIONAL CURBING MAY BE | | | NEEDED FOR LANDSCAPE AREAS. PREVIOUS COMMENT: CURBING | | | NEEDED FOR NARROW PARKING AREAS NORTH OF THE LANDSCAPE | | | ISLANDS. [CURBING SHOWN ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN] | | | | | | 9. [NOT SATISFIED] LANDSCAPE PLANS NOT INCLUDED IN | | | THESE SUBMITTALS. PREVIOUS COMMENT: SHOW UTILITIES ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 10. [NOT SATISFIED] LANDSCPAE PLANS NOT PROVIDED IN | | | THESE SUBMITTALS. PREVKIOUS COMMENT: SCALES SHOULD | | | MATCH FOR SURVEY, ENGINEERING PLANS AND LANDSCAPE | | | PLANS. | | | | | | 11. SHEET A001 PROPOSED SITE PLAN | | | A. [NOT SATISFIED] THE INCORRECT FLOOD ZONE IS NOW | | | SHOWN ON SHEET A000. PREVIOUS COMMENT: UPDATE THE FLOOD | | | ZONE INFORMATION (SEE THE BOUNDARY SURVEY). | | | B. [SATISFIED] A STANDARD PARKING SPACE IS 8.5' X 18'. | | | B.1. [NOT SATISFIED] THE STRIPING FOR PARKING SPACES | | | FACING S. DIXIE HWY, THE TWO SPACES FACING VALENCIA | | | ROAD AND THE FOUR PARKING SPACINGS BEHIND THE BUILDING | | | APPEAR TO BE LONGER THAN 18 FEET. | | | B.2. [SATISFIED] THERE IS THE OPPORTUNITY TO REDUCE THE | | | AMOUNT OF ASPHALT AND PARKING LOT RECONSTRUCTION BY | | | REDUCING THE LENGTH OF THE PARKING SPACES BY 2 FEET, | | | INCREASING THE LANDSCAPING BY TWO FEET, REDUCE THE | | | MOUNT OF STORMWATER RUNOFF AND PERHAPS REPLACING THE | | | WHEEL STOPS FITH TYPE 'D' CURB. PREVIOUS COMMENT: THERE | | | IS 2' PARKING OVERLAP WITH LANDSCAPING CALLED OUT FOR | | | THE TEN PARKING SPACES ALONG THE BACK OF THE PARKING | | | LOT. THESE PARKING SPACES ARE SHOWN TO BE 18 FEET LONG | | | SO THE OVERLAP IS NOT REQUIRED. | | | B.3. [NOT SATISFIED - OPTIONAL]THE DRIVE AISLE IS | | | DIMENSIONED TO BE 26' 6.5" WIDE. IT CAN BE NARROWED TO | | | 24 FEET. CONSIDERING THIS NARROWING AND PROVIDING THE | | | 2' PARKING OVERLAP CAN MOVE THE EAST EDGE OF THE | | | PARKING LOT TO THE WEST BY MORE THAN 4.5 FEET. | | | C. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE THE VERTICAL DATUM FOR THE | | | FFE. IT SHOULD MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE ENGINEERING | | | PLAN. | | | D. [NOT SATISFIED] SHOW STOP BARS AND STOP SIGNS. | | | E. [NOT SATISFIED] SHOW PARALLEL PARKING SPACES | | | (STRIPING) ALONG S. DIXIE HWY. | | | | | | 12. SHEET C-1 SITE PAVING & DRAINAGE PLAN | | | A. [SATISFIED] REPLACE THE DROP CURB WITH TYPE 'F' CURB | | | AND GUTTER IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING ALONG S. DIXIE HWY. | | | B. [SATISFIED] REPLACE THE SIDEWALK WITH 6" THICK | | | SIDEWALK WHERE THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY IS BEING WIDENED. | | | C. [SATISFIED] LABEL THE SLAB FOR THE BICYCLE RACK. | | | D. [SATISFIED]LABEL THE LEFT PROPOSED WALKWAY IN FRONT | | | OF THE BUILDING. | | | E. [SATISFIED] CONNECT THE ROOF DRAIN(S) FOR THE | | | PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION TO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. (CAN | | | BE SHOWN AT TIME OF ENGINEERING PERMIT). | | | | | | 13. [SATISFIED] SHEET C-3 PGD NOTES AND DETAILS - | | | INVERT ELEVATION OF PIPE SHOWN IN THE EXFILTRATION | | | TRENCH DETAIL DOES NOT MATCH THE INVERT ELEVATIONS | | | SHOWN ON SHEET C-1. | | | | | | 14. [SATISFIED] SHEET EC-1 SWPPP - SHOW BMPS FOR | | | OFFSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS. | | | | | | 15. SHEET A002 PARKING STALL STRIPING DETAIL: | | | A. [SATISFIED] WHEEL STOPS ARE GENERALLY 2 FEET FROM | | | THE END OF PARKING STALL. | | | B. [NOT SATISFIED] GRADES SHOWN FOIR HANDICAPP PARKING | | | SPACE WOULD RESULT IN A FLAT (NO SLOPE) PARKING AREA | | | AND STORMWATER RUNOFF WOULD NOT DRAIN OFF. GRADES ARE | | | SHOWN ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN. LABEL THE VERTICAL DATUM | | | ON SHEET A002. | | | | | | 16. [NOT SATISFIED] FDOT APPROVAL WILL BE NEEDED BEFORE | | | ENGINEERING PERMIT. PREVIOUS COMMENT: S. DIXIE HWY IS | | | MAINTAINED BY FDOT. FDOT'S APPROVAL FOR WORK WITHIN THE | | | RIGHT OF WAY WILL BE NEEDED. | | | | | | 17. [NEW COMMENT] STOP SIGNS AND STOP BARS WILL BE | | | NEEDED AT THE DRIVEWAY ENTRANCES.[CAN BE PROVIDED WITH | | | ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL] | | | | | | 18. [NEW COMMENT] SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED PARKING | | | ALONG S. DIXIE HWY. THE RESTRICTIVE PARKING SIGNS WILL | | | NEED TO BE RELOCATED. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 (O) | | | 561-351-0510 (M) | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-11-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
01-11-2021 |
Time |
10:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-01-11 14:47:35 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE A CONTINUATION FROM THE | | | INITIAL REVIEW AND AFTER THE REVIEW OF THE 12/30/2020 | | | SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. NO WRITTEN RESPONSES WERE PROVIDED | | | FOR THE INITIAL STORMWATER REVIEW COMMENTS. | | | | | | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. THE ENGINEERING AND LANDSCAPE PLANS DO NOT MATCH THE | | | SITE PLAN. [NOT SATISFIED] | | | | | | 2. ADD FLOW ARROWS TO THE ENGINEERING PLAN TO SHOW | | | SURFACE WATER RUNOFF DIRECTION. [SATISFIED] | | | | | | 3. AVOID PUTTING UTILITIES UNDER LANDSCAPE ISLANDS. | | | [NOT SATISFIED] | | | | | | 4. CONSIDER CREATING 2 FOOT OVERHANGS INTO LANDSCAPE | | | AREAS FOR PARKING SPACES. [SATISFIED - TWO-FOOT | | | OVERHANG SHOWN ON SITE PLAN BUT PAVED AREA OF PARKING | | | SPACES ARE DIMENSIONED AS 18' LONG. | | | | | | 5. CATCH BASIN GRATE ELEVATIONS APPEAR TO BE HIGHER | | | THAN SOME ADJACENT PARKING LOT GRADES.[SATISFIED] | | | | | | 6. THE TRAVEL LANE SPACE BETWEEN THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS | | | ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN APPEARS TOO NARROW FOR TWO WAY | | | TRAFFIC.[SATISFIED] | | | | | | 7. PROVIDE BOTTOM ELEVATION OF EXISTING ONSITE DRAINAGE | | | STRUCTURES THAT ARE TO REMAIN.[SATISFIED - ALL EXISTING | | | STRUCTURES ARE BEING REMOVED] | | | | | | 8. CURBING NEEDED FOR NARROW PARKING AREAS NORTH OF THE | | | LANDSCAPE ISLANDS.[SATISFIED - CURBING SHOWN ON THE | | | ENGINEERING PLAN] | | | | | | 9. SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.[NOT SATISFIED] | | | | | | 10. SCALES SHOULD MATCH FOR SURVEY, ENGINEERING PLANS | | | AND LANDSCAPE PLANS.[NOT SATISFIED] | | | | | | NEW COMMENTS | | | 11. SHEET A001 PROPOSED SITE PLAN | | | A. UPDATE THE FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION (SEE THE BOUNDARY | | | SURVEY). | | | B. A STANDARD PARKING SPACE IS 8.5' X 18'. | | | B.1. THE STRIPING FOR PARKING SPACES FACING S. DIXIE | | | HWY, THE TWO SPACES FACING VALENCIA ROAD AND THE FOUR | | | PARKING SPACINGS BEHIND THE BUILDING APPEAR TO BE | | | LONGER THAN 18 FEET. | | | B.2. THERE IS 2' PARKING OVERLAP WITH LANDSCAPING | | | CALLED OUT FOR THE TEN PARKING SPACES ALONG THE BACK OF | | | THE PARKING LOT. THESE PARKING SPACES ARE SHOWN TO BE | | | 18 FEET LONG SO THE OVERLAP IS NOT REQUIRED. | | | B.3. THE DRIVE AISLE IS DIMENSIONED TO BE 26' 6.5" | | | WIDE. IT CAN BE NARROWED TO 24 FEET. CONSIDERING THIS | | | NARROWING AND PROVIDING THE 2' PARKING OVERLAP CAN MOVE | | | THE EAST EDGE OF THE PARKING LOT TO THE WEST BY MORE | | | THAN 4.5 FEET. | | | C. PROVIDE THE VERTICAL DATUM FOR THE FFE. IT SHOULD | | | MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN. | | | D. SHOW STOP BARS AND STOP SIGNS. | | | E. SHOW PARALLEL PARKING SPACES (STRIPING) ALONG S. | | | DIXIE HWY. | | | | | | 12. SHEET C-1 SITE PAVING & DRAINAGE PLAN | | | A. REPLACE THE DROP CURB WITH TYPE 'F' CURB AND GUTTER | | | IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING ALONG S. DIXIE HWY. | | | B. REPLACE THE SIDEWALK WITH 6" THICK SIDEWALK WHERE | | | THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY IS BEING WIDENED. | | | C. LABEL THE SLAB FOR THE BICYCLE RACK. | | | D. LABEL THE LEFT PROPOSED WALKWAY IN FRONT OF THE | | | BUILDING. | | | E. CONNECT THE ROOF DRAIN(S) FOR THE PROPOSED BUILDING | | | ADDITION TO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. (CAN BE SHOWN AT TIME | | | OF ENGINEERING PERMIT). | | | | | | 13. SHEET C-3 PGD NOTES AND DETAILS - INVERT ELEVATION | | | OF PIPE SHOWN IN THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH DETAIL DOES | | | NOT MATCH THE INVERT ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON SHEET C-1. | | | | | | 14. SHEET EC-1 SWPPP - SHOW BMPS FOR OFFSITE DRAINAGE | | | SYSTEMS. | | | | | | 15. SHEET A002 PARKING STALL STRIPING DETAIL: | | | A. WHEEL STOPS ARE GENERALLY 2 FEET FROM THE END OF | | | PARKING STALL. | | | B. GRADES SHOWN FOIR HANDICAPP PARKING SPACE WOULD | | | RESULT IN A FLAT (NO SLOPE) PARKING AREA AND STORMWATER | | | RUNOFF WOULD NOT DRAIN OFF. GRADES ARE SHOWN ON THE | | | ENGINEERING PLAN. | | | | | | 16. S. DIXIE HWY IS MAINTAINED BY FDOT. FDOT'S APPROVAL | | | FOR WORK WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY WILL BE NEEDED. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-12-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
03-12-2020 |
Time |
11:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
03-12-2020 |
Time |
11:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-03-12 11:47:30 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. THE ENGINEERING AND LANDSCAPE PLANS DO NOT MATCH THE | | | SITE PLAN. | | | | | | 2. ADD FLOW ARROWS TO THE ENGINEERING PLAN TO SHOW | | | SURFACE WATER RUNOFF DIRECTION. | | | | | | 3. AVOID PUTTING UTILITIES UNDER LANDSCAPE ISLANDS. | | | | | | 4. CONSIDER CREATING 2 FOOT OVERHANGS INTO LANDSCAPE | | | AREAS FOR PARKING SPACES. | | | | | | 5. CATCH BASIN GRATE ELEVATIONS APPEAR TO BE HIGHER | | | THAN SOME ADJACENT PARKING LOT GRADES. | | | | | | 6. THE TRAVEL LANE SPACE BETWEEN THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS | | | ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN APPEARS TO NARROW FOR TWO WAY | | | TRAFFIC. | | | | | | 7. PROVIDE BOTTOM ELEVATION OF EXISTING ONSITE DRAINAGE | | | STRUCTURES THAT ARE TO REMAIN. | | | | | | 8. CURBING NEEDED FOR NARROW PARKING AREAS NORTH OF THE | | | LANDSCAPE ISLANDS. | | | | | | 9. SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 10. SCALES SHOULD MATCH FOR SURVEY, ENGINEERING PLANS | | | AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | | | | 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED | | | WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP PRIOR TO STARTING | | | CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
04-27-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
04-27-2021 |
Time |
07:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-04-27 07:38:24 | PASSED WITH CONDITIONS: | | | | | | 1. UNITY OF TITLE PRIOR TO C.O. | | | 2. GRANT OF UTILITY EASEMENTS ALONG SOUTH AND WEST | | | PROPERTY LINES AND ANY REQUIRED FOR METER PRIOR TO C.O. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-24-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
03-24-2021 |
Time |
15:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-24 15:03:48 | 1. NO RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS COMMENTS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-04-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
01-04-2021 |
Time |
09:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-01-04 09:11:52 | NO RESPONSE TO SURVEY COMMENTS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-10-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
03-10-2020 |
Time |
13:01 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-03-10 13:11:32 | 1. BY VIRTUE OF STATE STATUTE 95.361, THE WEST PROPERTY | | | LINE NEEDS TO BE REVISED TO THE EAST R/W LINE PER RPB | | | 9, PG. 15. | | | 2. A UTILITY EASEMENT OVER THE SOUTH AND WEST 5' WILL | | | NEED TO BE GRANTED TO THE CITY FOR THE EXISTING WATER | | | MAIN. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-03-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
05-03-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-05-03 10:17:20 | NO FURTHER COMMENTS. | | | | | | PASSED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS TO BE FULFILLED | | | PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: | | | | | | 1) UPDATE TRAFFIC STUDY SHOWCASING DRIVEWAY VOLUMES ON | | | DIXIE HIGHWAY | | | 2) ANALYZE THE FOLLOWING INTERSECTIONS, UNDER THE S | | | DIXIE LANE ELIMINATION PROJECT SCENARIO: | | | 2A. S DIXIE AND BELVEDERE | | | 2B. S DIXIE AND VALENCIA | | | | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-29-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
04-29-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-04-29 17:01:45 | TRAFFIC STUDY | | | 1. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | 2. NOT SATISFIED. DRIVEWAY VOLUMES ARE ONLY SHOWN ALONG | | | VALENCIA RD, NONE ALONG S DIXIE HWY. REVISE THE STUDY | | | ACCORDINGLY | | | 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE FDOT APPROVAL LETTER FOR THE CURB | | | CUT RELOCATION ON DIXIE | | | 4. WAVED. ANALYZE THE FOLLOWING INTERSECTIONS, UNDER | | | THE S DIXIE LANE ELIMINATION PROJECT SCENARIO: | | | 4A. S DIXIE AND BELVEDERE | | | 4B. S DIXIE AND VALENCIA | | | | | | SITE PLAN | | | 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW IN THE SITE PLAN THE ROAD | | | FEATURES AND CURB CUTS ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE | | | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ALONG VALENCIA RD AND S DIXIE HWY | | | 6. SATISFIED. MARK THE DELIVERIES AREA AS LOADING ZONE | | | 7. SATISFIED. PROVIDE FDOT AND/OR COUNTY APPROVAL FOR | | | THE ACCESS POINT RELOCATION ON S DIXIE HWY | | | 8. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ACCESS POINT ON VALENCIA ROAD | | | SHALL BE RELOCATED FURTHER EAST: | | | 8A. SATISFIED. CITY CODE SEC. 94-312 2(A) REQUIRES 50 | | | FEET CORNER CLEARANCE DISTANCE ON A NON-THOROUGHFARE. | | | CURRENTLY 40 FEET. | | | 8B. SATISFIED. THE DRIVEWAY TRAVEL PATH IS ENCROACHING | | | THE WEST SIDE PARKING STALLS | | | 8C. NOT SATISFIED. THE DRIVEWAY TRAVEL PATH IS | | | ENCROACHING THE EAST SIDE PARKING STALLS. DRIVEWAY | | | CENTER | | | 9. SATISFIED. DEVELOPER SHALL COORDINATE WITH PALM TRAN | | | PERTAINING THE NEARBY BUS STOP AND CONSTRUCT A BUS | | | SHELTER AT LOCATIONS NOT IN CONFLICT WITH THE S DIXIE | | | HIGHWAY FUTURE SHARED USED PATH. ALSO, CONSIDER | | | RELOCATING THE BUS STOP TO NEAR THE MAIN ENTRANCE WITH | | | COORDINATION WITH PALM TRAN. | | | 10. SATISFIED. CHECK FOR SIDEWALK CONDITIONS PER ADA | | | COMPLIANCE | | | 11. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN PATHS FOR GARBAGE | | | TRUCK AND SERVICE VEHICLES. SHOWCASE VEHICLES | | | MANEUVERING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPERTY. PLEASE PROVIDE | | | AUTOTURN ANALYSIS AS A SEPARATE DRAWING AND SHOWCASE | | | VEHICLES' DYNAMIC ENVELOPE. PROVIDE DESIGN VEHICLES' | | | DIMENSIONS. | | | 12. NOT SATISFIED. SHOWCASE DIXIE DRIVEWAYS APRON. | | | 13. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE ON-STREET PARKING STRIPING | | | AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-25-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
03-25-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-25 09:31:52 | TRAFFIC STUDY | | | 1. DRIVEWAY VOLUMES ARE ONLY SHOWN ALONG VALENCIA RD, | | | NONE ALONG S DIXIE HWY. | | | 1A. REVISE THE STUDY ACCORDINGLY | | | 1B. PROVIDE FDOT APPROVAL LETTER FOR THE CURB CUT | | | RELOCATION | | | 2. ANALYZE THE FOLLOWING INTERSECTIONS, UNDER THE S | | | DIXIE LANE ELIMINATION PROJECT SCENARIO: | | | 2A. S DIXIE AND BELVEDERE | | | 2B. S DIXIE AND VALENCIA | | | | | | SITE PLAN | | | 3. PLEASE SHOW IN THE SITE PLAN THE ROAD FEATURES AND | | | CURB CUTS ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT ALONG VALENCIA RD AND S DIXIE HWY | | | 4. MARK THE DELIVERIES AREA AS LOADING ZONE | | | 5. PROVIDE FDOT AND/OR COUNTY APPROVAL FOR THE ACCESS | | | POINT RELOCATION ON S DIXIE HWY | | | 6. ACCESS POINT ON VALENCIA ROAD SHALL BE RELOCATED | | | FURTHER EAST: | | | 6A. CITY CODE SEC. 94-312 2(A) REQUIRES 50 FEET CORNER | | | CLEARANCE DISTANCE ON A NON-THOROUGHFARE. CURRENTLY 40 | | | FEET. | | | 6B. THE DRIVEWAY TRAVEL PATH IS ENCROACHING THE WEST | | | SIDE PARKING STALLS | | | 7. DEVELOPER SHALL COORDINATE WITH PALM TRAN PERTAINING | | | THE NEARBY BUS STOP AND CONSTRUCT A BUS SHELTER AT | | | LOCATIONS NOT IN CONFLICT WITH THE S DIXIE HIGHWAY | | | FUTURE SHARED USED PATH. ALSO, CONSIDER RELOCATING THE | | | BUS STOP TO NEAR THE MAIN ENTRANCE WITH COORDINATION | | | WITH PALM TRAN. | | | 8. CHECK FOR SIDEWALK CONDITIONS PER ADA COMPLIANCE | | | 9. PROVIDE AUTOTURN PATHS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND SERVICE | | | VEHICLES. SHOWCASE VEHICLES MANEUVERING IN AND OUT OF | | | THE PROPERTY. | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-05-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
02-05-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-02-05 16:53:13 | TRAFFIC STUDY | | | 1. DRIVEWAY VOLUMES ARE ONLY SHOWN ALONG VALENCIA RD, | | | NONE ALONG S DIXIE HWY. | | | 1A. ARE YOU ABANDONING THE DRIVEWAYS ON S DIXIE HWY? | | | 1B. IF NOT, PLEASE PROVIDE FDOT APPROVAL LETTER AND | | | REVISE THE TRAFFIC STUDY ACCORDINGLY | | | 2. ANALYZE THE FOLLOWING INTERSECTIONS, UNDER THE S | | | DIXIE LANE ELIMINATION PROJECT SCENARIO: | | | 2A. S DIXIE AND BELVEDERE | | | 2B. S DIXIE AND VALENCIA | | | | | | SITE PLAN | | | 3. PLEASE SHOW CURB AND CURB CUTS ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE | | | OF THE PROPERTY ALONG VALENCIA RD AND S DIXIE HWY | | | 4. NEED TO DESIGNATE AND PROVIDE DIMENSIONS OF THE | | | LOADING ZONE | | | 5. PROVIDE VEHICLE AND BICYCLE PARKING INFORMATION IN | | | THE ZONING & SITE CALCULATIONS TABLE | | | 6. PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING | | | 7. REMOVE PARKING ON THE SOUTH-WEST SIDE OF THE | | | PROPERTY. NOT ENOUGH SPACE FOR VEHICLES TO | | | MANEUVER/TURNAROUND | | | 8. PARKING ISLANDS (BOTH INTERIOR AND TERMINAL) DO NOT | | | MEET THE 8? MINIMUM REQUIREMENT PER ARTICLE XIV SEC. | | | 94-443 (C) (3) A-B | | | 9. PLEASE CLARIFY CIRCULATION AND MANEUVERING IN THE | | | SOUTH EAST PORTION OF THE PROPERTY, MARKED AS ?NEW | | | ASPHALT PAVEMENT? | | | 10. THE DEVELOPER SHALL COORDINATE WITH FDOT AND CITY | | | OF WEST PALM BEACH ON THE DIXIE HIGHWAY LANE | | | ELIMINATION PROJECT ALONG THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE UNTIL | | | THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE LANE ELIMINATION PROJECT IS | | | COMPLETED. | | | 11. ACCESS POINTS DEPICTED ON S DIXIE HWY | | | 11A. CITY CODE SEC. 94-312 1(A) ONLY ALLOWS ONE ACCESS | | | POINT PER STREET. CURRENTLY TWO. | | | 11B. CITY CODE SEC. 94-312 2(A) REQUIRES 245 FEET | | | DISTANCE BETWEEN DRIVEWAYS ON A MINOR ARTERIAL. | | | CURRENTLY 60 FEET DISTANCE. | | | 12. ACCESS POINT ON VALENCIA ROAD | | | 12A. CITY CODE SEC. 94-312 2(A) REQUIRES 50 FEET CORNER | | | CLEARANCE DISTANCE ON A NON-THOROUGHFARE. CURRENTLY 40 | | | FEET. | | | 13. PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN PATH FROM VALENCIA RD TO THE | | | PROPOSED BUILDING WALKWAY THROUGH THE SITE | | | 14. DEVELOPER SHALL COORDINATE WITH PALM TRAN | | | PERTAINING THE NEARBY BUS STOP AND CONSTRUCT A BUS | | | SHELTER AT LOCATIONS NOT IN CONFLICT WITH THE S DIXIE | | | HIGHWAY FUTURE SHARED USED PATH. ALSO, CONSIDER | | | RELOCATING THE BUS STOP TO NEAR THE MAIN ENTRANCE WITH | | | COORDINATION WITH PALM TRAN. | | | 15. CHECK FOR SIDEWALK CONDITIONS PER ADA COMPLIANCE | | | 16. PROVIDE AUTOTURN PATHS FOR GARBAGE, TRUCKS AND | | | SERVICE VEHICLES | | | 17. PROVIDE SITE PHOTOMETRIC ANALYSIS | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
03-11-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-03-11 09:44:56 | TRAFFIC STUDY | | | 1. DRIVEWAY VOLUMES ARE ONLY SHOWN ALONG VALENCIA RD, | | | NONE ALONG S DIXIE HWY. | | | A. ARE YOU ABANDONING THE DRIVEWAYS ON S DIXIE HWY? | | | B. IF NOT, PLEASE PROVIDE FDOT APPROVAL LETTER AND | | | REVISE THE TRAFFIC STUDY ACCORDINGLY | | | | | | 2. ANALYZE THE FOLLOWING INTERSECTIONS, UNDER THE S | | | DIXIE LANE ELIMINATION PROJECT SCENARIO: | | | A. S DIXIE AND BELVEDERE | | | B. S DIXIE AND VALENCIA | | | | | | SITE PLAN | | | | | | 3. PLEASE SHOW CURB AND CURB CUTS ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE | | | OF THE PROPERTY ALONG VALENCIA RD AND S DIXIE HWY | | | | | | 4. NEED TO DESIGNATE AND PROVIDE DIMENSIONS OF THE | | | LOADING ZONE | | | | | | 5. PROVIDE VEHICLE AND BICYCLE PARKING INFORMATION IN | | | THE ZONING & SITE CALCULATIONS TABLE | | | | | | 6. PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING | | | | | | 7. REMOVE PARKING ON THE SOUTH-WEST SIDE OF THE | | | PROPERTY. NOT ENOUGH SPACE FOR VEHICLES TO | | | MANEUVER/TURNAROUND | | | | | | 8. PARKING ISLANDS (BOTH INTERIOR AND TERMINAL) DO NOT | | | MEET THE 8' MINIMUM REQUIREMENT PER ARTICLE XIV SEC. | | | 94-443 (C) (3) A-B | | | | | | 9. PLEASE CLARIFY CIRCULATION AND MANEUVERING IN THE | | | SOUTH EAST PORTION OF THE PROPERTY, MARKED AS "NEW | | | ASPHALT PAVEMENT" | | | | | | 10. THE DEVELOPER SHALL COORDINATE WITH FDOT AND CITY | | | OF WEST PALM BEACH ON THE DIXIE HIGHWAY LANE | | | ELIMINATION PROJECT ALONG THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE UNTIL | | | THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE LANE ELIMINATION PROJECT IS | | | COMPLETED. | | | | | | 11. ACCESS POINTS DEPICTED ON S DIXIE HWY | | | A. CITY CODE SEC. 94-312 1(A) ONLY ALLOWS ONE ACCESS | | | POINT PER STREET. CURRENTLY TWO. | | | B. CITY CODE SEC. 94-312 2(A) REQUIRES 245 FEET | | | DISTANCE BETWEEN DRIVEWAYS ON A MINOR ARTERIAL. | | | CURRENTLY 60 FEET DISTANCE. | | | | | | 12. ACCESS POINT ON VALENCIA ROAD | | | A. CITY CODE SEC. 94-312 2(A) REQUIRES 50 FEET CORNER | | | CLEARANCE DISTANCE ON A NON-THOROUGHFARE. CURRENTLY 40 | | | FEET. | | | | | | 13. PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN PATH FROM VALENCIA RD TO THE | | | PROPOSED BUILDING WALKWAY THROUGH THE SITE | | | | | | 14. DEVELOPER SHALL COORDINATE WITH PALM TRAN | | | PERTAINING THE NEARBY BUS STOP AND CONSTRUCT A BUS | | | SHELTER AT LOCATIONS NOT IN CONFLICT WITH THE S DIXIE | | | HIGHWAY FUTURE SHARED USED PATH. ALSO, CONSIDER | | | RELOCATING THE BUS STOP TO NEAR THE MAIN ENTRANCE WITH | | | COORDINATION WITH PALM TRAN. | | | | | | 15. CHECK FOR SIDEWALK CONDITIONS PER ADA COMPLIANCE | | | | | | 16. PROVIDE AUTOTURN PATHS FOR GARBAGE, TRUCKS AND | | | SERVICE VEHICLES | | | | | | 17. PROVIDE SITE PHOTOMETRIC ANALYSIS | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1092 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-04-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
05-04-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
05-04-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-05-19 10:42:33 | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (OVERALL - UPDATED 5/19/2021): | | | | | | 1.) A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT FOR THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE | | | ACCESS POINT(S) ON SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY SHALL BE | | | RECEIVED FROM THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION | | | (FDOT) PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR | | | ANY EXTERIOR SITE WORK TO BE COMPLETED FOR THE PROJECT. | | | A COPY OF THE REQUIRED FDOT PERMIT SHALL BE PROVIDED TO | | | THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION | | | UPON RECEIPT OF THE PERMIT. | | | | | | 2.) HE BICYCLE RACKS SHALL BE ORIENTATED PARALLEL (NOT | | | PERPENDICULAR AS PROVIDED IN THE PLANS) TO SOUTH DIXIE | | | HIGHWAY, AS IT WOULD BE MORE FUNCTIONAL WITH THE DESIGN | | | AND PLACEMENT OF THE BICYCLE RACK PAD ON SITE. THE | | | DESIGN OF THE BICYCLE RACK PAD SHALL REMAIN CONSISTENT | | | WITH THE CITY'S BICYCLE PARKING GUIDELINES. A SEPARATE | | | BUILDING PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE INSTALLATION | | | OF THE BICYCLE RACK(S) AND PAD. | | | | | | 3.) RIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY | | | (C.O.) FOR THE PROJECT, THE APPLICANT SHALL COMPLETE | | | THE FOLLOWING: A.) A UNITY OF TITLE APPLICATION SHALL | | | BE FILED WITH THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AND | | | A COPY OF THE RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE DOCUMENT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED AND FILED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | | | DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION. B.) GRANT OF UTILITY | | | EASEMENTS ALONG THE SOUTH AND WEST PROPERTY LINES AND | | | ANY REQUIRED FOR METER. C.) UPDATE TRAFFIC STUDY | | | SHOWCASING DRIVEWAY VOLUMES ON DIXIE HIGHWAY. D.) | | | ANALYZE THE FOLLOWING INTERSECTIONS, UNDER THE SOUTH | | | DIXIE LANE ELIMINATION PROJECT SCENARIO: I) SOUTH DIXIE | | | HIGHWAY AND BELVEDERE ROAD II) SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY AND | | | VALENCIA ROAD | | | | | | 4.) PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION. | | | | | | | | | ********* | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2021-05-04 08:52:13 | PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE SITE PLAN AND SITE | | | PLAN DETAIL SHEETS FOR FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL WITH | | | ZONING: | | | | | | 1.) THE PARKING STALL STRIPING DETAIL AND SITE PLAN | | | SHOWS THE PARKING STALLS ENCROACHING INTO THE DRIVE | | | AISLE. PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR ZONING: | | | | | | 1.) A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT FOR THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE | | | ACCESS POINT(S) ON SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY SHALL BE | | | RECEIVED FROM THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION | | | (FDOT) PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR | | | ANY EXTERIOR SITE WORK TO BE COMPLETED FOR THE PROJECT. | | | A COPY OF THE REQUIRED FDOT PERMIT SHALL BE PROVIDED TO | | | THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION | | | UPON RECEIPT OF THE PERMIT. | | | | | | 2.) THE BICYCLE RACKS SHALL BE ORIENTATED PARALLEL (NOT | | | PERPENDICULAR AS PROVIDED IN THE PLANS) TO SOUTH DIXIE | | | HIGHWAY, AS IT WOULD BE MORE FUNCTIONAL WITH THE DESIGN | | | AND PLACEMENT OF THE BICYCLE RACK PAD ON SITE. THE | | | DESIGN OF THE BICYCLE RACK PAD SHALL REMAIN CONSISTENT | | | WITH THE CITY'S BICYCLE PARKING GUIDELINES. A SEPARATE | | | BUILDING PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE INSTALLATION | | | OF THE BICYCLE RACK AND PAD. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-24-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
03-24-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
03-24-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-03-24 13:19:50 | GENERAL COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) THE SITE PLAN SHOWS MODIFICATIONS TO THE EXISTING | | | CURB CUT(S) TO THE PROPERTY FROM SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY. A | | | PREDETERMINATION LETTER FROM THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF | | | TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) APPROVING THE PROPOSED | | | MODIFICATIONS TO THE CURB CUT(S) IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO | | | THE ISSUANCE OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL. [1/5/2021 REPEAT | | | COMMENT: AN EXAMPLE OF FDOTS PREDETERMINATION LETTER | | | WAS PROVIDED TO ROBERT DUMMICH, ARCHITECT, ON 3/24/21] | | | | | | | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING OUTSTANDING COMMENTS | | | TO THE ZONING & SITE CALCULATIONS TABULAR FROM | | | 1/5/2021: A) THE PROVIDED BUILDING HEIGHT IS INCORRECT | | | AND MUST BE CORRECTED FOR CONSISTENCY (THE OVERALL | | | BUILDING HEIGHT IS CLEARLY NOT 29.5 FT.). ALSO NOTE | | | THAT THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING IS MEASURED TO THE TOP | | | OF THE PARAPET (NOT THE ROOF LINE AS PROVIDED IN THE | | | ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS). B) CHECK PARKING | | | CALCULATIONS. THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED FOR | | | THE PROJECT DOES NOT ADD UP TO 24. | | | | | | 2.) A TWO-WAY DRIVE SHALL NOT BE GREATER THAN 20 FT. | | | WIDE AT THE PROPERTY LINE. [1/5/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: A | | | 24 FT. WIDE CURB CUT WIDTH AT THE PROPERTY LINE IS NOT | | | PERMITTED IN THE CITY.] | | | | | | 3.) THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSE TO SITE PLAN COMMENT #10 | | | (1/5/2021), STATES THAT THE EXISTING FREESTANDING SIGN | | | WILL BE RELOCATED. THE SITE PLAN MUST SHOW THE EXACT | | | LOCATION OF THE SIGN RELOCATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY | | | RELOCATION OF SIGNAGE WILL REQUIRE THE SIGN TO COME | | | INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE SIGN REGULATIONS OF THE ZLDRS, | | | INCLUDING SETBACKS, SIGN STRUCTURE HEIGHT AND SIGN | | | AREA. ALSO, PLEASE INCLUDE A SIGN DETAIL SHOWING THE | | | SIGN STRUCTURE HEIGHT AND GENERAL SIGN AREA. [1/5/2021 | | | MODIFIED COMMENT] | | | | | | 4.) TO CLARIFY STAFF'S SITE PLAN COMMENTS #13 AND #14, | | | CONSISTENCY IN THE PLANS IS REQUIRED (I.E. IF WHEEL | | | STOPS ARE TO BE PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN, THEN THE | | | DETAIL MUST SHOW WHEEL STOPS; IF A 2 FT. CURB OVERHANG | | | IS PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN, THEN IT MUST BE DEPICTED | | | AS SUCH IN THE DETAIL). AFTER SPEAKING TO RCARANCI | | | (LANDSCAPING) IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT A 2 FT. CURB | | | OVERHANG SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN LIEU OF WHEEL STOPS IN | | | ORDER TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE AREA TO THE SITE. | | | PLEASE WORK WITH ZONING AND LANDSCAPING TO MAKE SURE | | | THIS COMMENT IS CONSISTENTLY ADDRESSED. [1/5/2021 | | | MODIFIED SITE PLAN COMMENTS #13 AND #14] | | | | | | 5.) ALL NEW LIGHT POLE FIXTURES MUST BE SETBACK A | | | MINIMUM OF 15 FT. FROM A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT. | | | THERE IS ONE LIGHT POLE FIXTURE ALONG THE NORTH | | | PROPERTY LINE THAT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THIS SETBACK | | | REQUIREMENT. [1/5/2021 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 6.) THE LOCATION OF THE BICYCLE RACKS SHALL BE | | | CONSISTENT WITH THE STANDARDS FOR RACK PLACEMENT PER | | | ZLDR S.94-485(Q). [1/5/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: THE | | | PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE BICYCLE RACKS DOES NOT MEET | | | THE MINIMUM STANDARDS.] | | | | | | 7.) THE PROPOSED BACKUP/TURNAROUND SPACE SHALL BE | | | HATCHED TO ILLUSTRATE THAT IT NOT A PARKING SPACE FOR | | | CUSTOMERS. | | | | | | 8.) TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ARE REQUIRED AT THE END | | | OF EACH ROW OF PARKING. PLEASE WORK WITH RAY CARANCI, | | | SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER, TO SATISFY THIS REQUIREMENT. | | | | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS: | | | | | | 1.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | CALCULATIONS AND INFORMATION PROVIDED FOR THE ALLOWANCE | | | OF THE PROPOSED BAR FACILITY: A) THE SERVICE AREA | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE ON SHEETS A001 AND A102 DO NOT MATCH. | | | PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. B) CHECK THE SEATING | | | NUMBERS. THERE DOES NOT SEEM TO BE 160 SEATS PROVIDED | | | AND AS NOTED IN THE FLOOR PLAN (SHEET A102). PLEASE | | | ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. | | | | | | 2.) THE BUILDING HEIGHT TO THE TOP OF THE PARAPET SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED (I.E. DIMENSION PROVIDED IN THE PLANS TO | | | THE TOP OF THE ROOF LINE IS INSUFFICIENT). | | | | | | | | | PHOTOMETRIC PLAN: | | | | | | 1.) SETBACK DISTANCE TO THE PROPERTY LINE FOR ALL LIGHT | | | POLE FIXTURES MUST ALSO BE INCLUDED IN THE PHOTOMETRIC | | | PLAN. ALL LIGHT POLES MUST COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM | | | SETBACKS AS PROVIDED IN THE ZLDRS. [1/5/2021 MODIFIED | | | PHOTOMETRIC PLAN COMMENT #2] | | | | | | 2.) THE FOLLOWING NOTE MUST ALSO BE PROVIDED IN THE | | | PHOTOMETRIC PLAN: ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE | | | SHIELDED TO REDUCE GLARE AND SHALL BE ARRANGED TO | | | REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE AWAY FROM ALL ADJACENT | | | RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT RESIDENCES, OR PUBLIC | | | THOROUGHFARES. [ZLDR S.94-309(2)] [1/5/2021 REPEAT | | | COMMENT] | | | | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | * ANY CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE | | | (3) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 11 INCHES X | | | 17 INCHES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND | | | DOCUMENTS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE | | | ($200.00). | | | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE | | | QUESTIONS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-05-2021 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
01-05-2021 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
01-05-2021 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2021-01-05 15:05:59 | GENERAL COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) SERVICE LETTERS FROM AT&T, FPU, FPL AND COMCAST | | | CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH | | | INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE | | | PROVISION OF THEIR SERVICES ARE REQUIRED. PLEASE REFER | | | TO PAGE 7 OF THE 2021 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR | | | CONTACT INFORMATION ON THE SERVICE PROVIDERS. | | | | | | 2.) RESPONSES TO SEC. 94-35(C) OF THE ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS) IS MISSING FROM THE | | | APPLICATION FILE. PLEASE PROVIDE AS THIS IS A REQUIRED | | | COMPONENT OF THE INFORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS | | | (REFERENCE PAGE 26 OF THE 2021 DEVELOPMENT | | | APPLICATION). | | | | | | 3.) THE TPS APPROVAL LETTER ISSUED BY THE PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS - | | | TRAFFIC DIVISION (ISSUED ON 2/19/2020) SHALL BE UPDATED | | | TO REFLECT THE CHANGES IN THE BUILDING SIZE (5,426 SQ. | | | FT.) TO ELIMINATE ANY POSSIBILITY OF GHOST TRIPS | | | GENERATED BY THE PROJECT. | | | | | | 4.) THE SITE PLAN SHOWS MODIFICATIONS TO THE EXISTING | | | CURB CUT(S) TO THE PROPERTY FROM SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY. A | | | PREDETERMINATION LETTER FROM THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF | | | TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) APPROVING THE PROPOSED | | | MODIFICATION TO THE CURB CUT(S) IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO | | | THE ISSUANCE OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL. | | | | | | | | | | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE SITE PLAN IS NOT | | | CONSISTENT WITH THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE SURVEY. | | | [3/9/2020 REPEAT COMMENT: NOT ADDRESSED (SHEETS A000 | | | AND A001). ALTHOUGH THE RESPONSE LETTER TO STAFF'S | | | COMMENTS (DATED 12/14/2020) STATES THAT THE LEGAL | | | DESCRIPTION HAS BEEN REVISED, IT IS STILL INCORRECT IN | | | THE RESUBMITTED PLANS. | | | | | | 2.) LOT DIMENSIONS PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT | | | MATCH THE LOT DIMENSIONS PROVIDED IN THE SURVEY. PLEASE | | | ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY (I.E. SHEETS A000 AND A001). | | | | | | 3.) PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE ZONING | | | AND SITE CALCULATIONS TABULAR ON SHEET A001: A) THE | | | PROVIDED LOT WIDTH IS 100.00' (PER THE SURVEY) AND NOT | | | 93'. B) THE PROVIDED SIDE SETBACK IS 5'-7" (NOT 5'). C) | | | THE REQUIRED/ALLOWED REAR SETBACK (ABUTTING A | | | RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT) IS 15.0' (NOT 5.0'). D) | | | THE PROVIDED BUILDING HEIGHT IS THE PROPOSED BUILDING | | | HEIGHT AS PROVIDED IN THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS (NOT | | | NONE AS PROVIDED IN THE TABULAR). | | | | | | 4.) A DESIGNATED BACKOUT/TURNAROUND SPACE SHALL BE | | | REQUIRED FOR THE PARKING AREA LOCATED NORTH OF THE | | | BUILDING. | | | | | | 5.) THE LOCATION OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE SHALL BE | | | LOCATED AT LEAST A MINIMUM OF 5 FT. AND 15 FT. FROM THE | | | PROPERTY LINE WHEN ABUTTING A RESIDENTIAL ZONING | | | DISTRICT. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS THAT THE ENCLOSURE IS | | | ONLY SETBACK 4 FT. FROM THE PROPERTY LINE ON ONE SIDE. | | | PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE ZLDRS. [ZLDR | | | S.94-145(2)] | | | | | | 6.) PLEASE CLARIFY IF THE "OPEN ENTRY GARDEN" IS A | | | PEDESTRIAN SPACE. IF SO, IT WOULD BE NECESSARY TO | | | PROVIDE A BUFFER (I.E. LANDSCAPE) TO PROTECT | | | PEDESTRIANS FROM VEHICLES AS THERE IS AN EXISTING CURB | | | CUT FROM SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY TO THE SPACE. | | | | | | 7.) PLEASE CLEARLY ILLUSTRATE AND DELINEATE THE WIDTH | | | OF THE PROPOSED CURB CUT(S) TO THE PROJECT, AND ANY | | | PROPOSED NEW BUFFERS WITHIN THE PROJECT. IT IS | | | IMPERATIVE TO PROVIDE SEPARATION BETWEEN PEDESTRIAN | | | SPACES AND VEHICULAR CIRCULATION AREAS. | | | | | | 8.) A TWO-WAY DRIVE SHALL NOT BE GREATER THAN 20 FT. | | | WIDE AT THE PROPERTY LINE. PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS | | | FOR ALL MODIFIED CURB CUTS TO DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENCY | | | WITH THE ZLDRS. [ZLDR S.94-312(1)] | | | | | | 9.) ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM | | | VEHICULAR USE AREAS BY NON-MOUNTABLE CONCRETE CURBING. | | | IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THE LANDSCAPE TERMINAL ISLAND | | | LOCATED NEXT TO THE TWO-WAY DRIVE AISLE EXITING ONTO | | | SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY IS OF THE REQUIRED CURBING. PLEASE | | | IDENTIFY IN THE PLANS FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE ZLDRS. | | | [ZLDR S.94-443(C)] | | | | | | 10.) THERE IS A FLOATING "SIGN" NOTATION IN THE PARKING | | | AREA. PLEASE CLARIFY IN THE PLANS. IF THIS IS THE | | | EXISTING SIGN AS DEPICTED IN THE SURVEY, THEN IT SHOULD | | | BE ILLUSTRATED AND NOTED AS SUCH. IF A NEW SIGN IS | | | PROPOSED WITHIN THE PROJECT, THEN ALL NEW INFORMATION | | | ON THE SIGN (LOCATION IN THE SITE PLAN AND DETAILS OF | | | THE PROPOSED SIGNAGE) SHALL BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 11.) THE TWO "STANDARD" PARKING SPACES LOCATED TOGETHER | | | DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM DIMENSIONS FOR A STANDARD | | | PARKING STALL (TOTAL OF 17 FT. WIDE). PLEASE ADDRESS IN | | | THE SITE PLAN. [ZLDR S.94-485] | | | | | | 12.) ALL H.C. PARKING SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED OUTSIDE OF | | | THE 2 FT. VEHICULAR OVERHANG TO ENSURE THERE WILL BE NO | | | CONFLICT. | | | | | | 13.) THE PARKING STALL STRIPING DETAIL ON SHEET A002 | | | ILLUSTRATES THE USE OF WHEEL STOPS; HOWEVER, THIS IS | | | NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE SITE PLAN (I.E. 2 FT. CURB | | | OVERHANG). PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. | | | | | | 14.) THE 2 FT. CURB OVERHANG FOR VEHICLES SHALL BE | | | NOTED IN ALL PARKING AREAS WHERE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 15.) ELIMINATE THE DUPLICATION OF THE H.C. PARKING | | | SYMBOL IN ONE OF THE PARKING STALLS. | | | | | | 16.) CLEARLY ILLUSTRATE THE LOADING ZONE IN THE SITE | | | PLAN TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THERE WILL BE NO CONFLICT WITH | | | THE PARKING ADJACENT TO THE LOADING AREA. APPROPRIATE | | | TRUCK MANEUVERING TO AND FROM THE LOADING ZONE IS ALSO | | | REQUIRED. PER THE ZLDRS THE USE WOULD REQUIRE ONE (1) | | | 10 FT. X 25 FT. LOADING ZONE. [ZLDR S.94-485, TABLE | | | XV-4] | | | | | | 17.) NEW LIGHT POLES ARE DETECTED IN THE PHOTOMETRIC | | | PLAN; HOWEVER, THE LIGHT POLES ARE NOT SHOWN IN THE | | | SITE PLAN. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. ALSO NOTE | | | THAT ALL NEW POLE FIXTURES MUST BE SETBACK A MINIMUM OF | | | 5 FT. AND A MINIMUM OF 15 FT. (WHEN ABUTTING A | | | RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT) FROM THE PROPERTY LINES. | | | SOME FIXTURES DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM SETBACK DISTANCE. | | | [ZLDR S.94-145(2)] | | | | | | 18.) BICYCLE PARKING CALCULATIONS HAVE NOT BEEN | | | INCLUDED IN THE SITE DATA CALCULATIONS AS REQUESTED BY | | | STAFF. [3/9/2020 REPEAT COMMENT: NOT ADDRESSED.] | | | | | | 19.) PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING FOR THE PROJECT. THE | | | LOCATION OF THE RACK SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE | | | STANDARDS PROVIDED IN ZLDR SEC. 94-485(Q). [NOTE: THERE | | | SEEMS TO BE A NOTE IN THE SITE PLAN INDICATING BICYCLE | | | PARKING FOR TWO BICYCLES; HOWEVER, THE RACK MUST BE | | | DEPICTED IN THE PLAN. ALSO, THE LOCATION IS | | | INCONSISTENT WITH THE LOCATION STANDARDS FOR BICYCLE | | | PARKING, PER THE CITY'S BICYCLE PARKING GUIDELINES.] | | | | | | 20.) A DETAIL OF A BICYCLE RACK IS REQUIRED. THE RACK | | | DETAIL MUST BE SITE SPECIFIC AND MUST ALSO BE | | | CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S BICYCLE PARKING GUIDELINES. | | | | | | 21.) THE FENCE ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE SHALL BE | | | NOTED IN THE SITE PLAN. IT IS REQUIRED THAT THE | | | EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE BE REPLACED WITH AN OPAQUE | | | WALL/FENCE TO PROVIDE SCREENING AND PROTECTION FROM THE | | | ABUTTING RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT/USE. A MINIMUM 6 | | | FT. HIGH WALL/FENCE IS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. [ZLDR | | | S.94-443(A)] | | | | | | | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS: | | | | | | 1.) A BAR FACILITY IS DEPICTED IN THE FLOOR PLAN ON | | | SHEET A102. PLEASE NOTE THAT PER CHAPTER 6 OF THE | | | CITY'S CODE OF ORDINANCES, ONLY RESTAURANTS HAVING | | | 2,500 SQUARE FEET OF SERVICE AREA AND EQUIPPED TO SERVE | | | 150 PERSONS FULL COURSE MEALS AT ONE TIME, AND DERIVING | | | AT LEAST 51 PERCENT OF THEIR GROSS REVENUE FROM THE | | | SALE OF FOOD AND NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES MAY BE EXEMPT | | | FROM MEETING THE DISTANCE SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS OF | | | SERVING LIQUOR FOR CONSUMPTION ON PREMISE ONLY. IF THIS | | | CANNOT BE MET, THE BAR FACILITY MUST BE REMOVED. | | | OTHERWISE, PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS THAT DEMONSTRATE | | | THAT THE PROPOSED BUSINESS QUALIFIES FOR SUCH | | | EXEMPTION. [CODE OF ORDINANCES SEC. 6-2] | | | | | | | | | | | | PHOTOMETRIC PLAN: | | | | | | 1.) PLEASE IDENTIFY WHICH LIGHT POLE FIXTURES ARE | | | EXISTING AND NEW TO THE PROJECT. | | | | | | 2.) SHOW THE SETBACK DISTANCE FOR ALL NEW POLE FIXTURES | | | TO THE PROPERTY LINE. PER ZLDR S.94-145, ALL NEW | | | STRUCTURES SHALL BE SETBACK A MINIMUM OF 5 FT. AND 15 | | | FT. (WHEN ABUTTING A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT) FROM | | | THE PROPERTY LINES. SOME LIGHT POLE FIXTURES DO NOT | | | MEET THE MINIMUM SETBACK DISTANCE REQUIRED BY THE | | | ZLDRS. [ZLDR S.94-145(2)] | | | | | | 3.) PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING NOTE IN THE PLAN: ALL OUTDOOR | | | LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE GLARE AND SHALL BE | | | ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE AWAY FROM ALL | | | ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT RESIDENCES, OR | | | PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES. [ZLDR S.94-309(2)] | | | | | | | | | | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) CHECK OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS ON SHEET L-3. THE | | | OPEN SPACE PERCENTAGE CALCULATION (40%) IS INCORRECT | | | (STAFF HAS CALCULATED 80%). | | | | | | | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | * ANY CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE | | | (3) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 11 INCHES X | | | 17 INCHES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND | | | DOCUMENTS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE | | | ($200.00). | | | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE | | | QUESTIONS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-09-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
03-09-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rfalcone |
Date |
03-09-2020 |
Time |
11:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-03-09 11:52:00 | PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW | | | ________________________________________ | | | | | | DATE OF REVIEW: 03/06/2020 | | | PROJECT NO.: Z20020009 | | | CASE NO.: ISPR 20-09 | | | ________________________________________ | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING | | | REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE PROPERTY DEED. | | | 2. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE SITE PLAN IS NOT | | | CONSISTANT WITH THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE SURVEY. | | | PLEASE REVISE. | | | 3. REVISE THE SIZE OF THE DUMPSTER TO COMPLY WITH | | | PUBLIC WORKS REGULATIONS. INPUT THE GRAPHIC ON PLAN | | | SET. | | | 4. REMOVE THE SOUTHERN CURB CUT AND SMALL PARKING LOT | | | ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY. PURSUANT, ZLDR SEC. | | | 94-312(1)(1), ONLY ONE ACCESS DRIVE PER RIGHT OF WAY. | | | 5. RELOCATE THE HANDICAP PARKING STALL AT A DIFFERENT | | | LOCATION ON THE SITE. | | | 6. CONTACT D.O.T. FOR PERMISSION TO CLOSE THE SOUTHERN | | | CURB CUT ALONG S. DIXIE HIGHWAY. | | | 7. CONTACT D.O.T. FOR PERMISSION TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL | | | ON STREET PARKING ALONG S. DIXIE TO BE COUNTED TOWARDS | | | TOTAL PARKING CALCULATIONS FOR PROPERTY. | | | 8. REMOVE THE FOURTH PARKING STALL IN THE REAR OF THE | | | PROPERTY NEAR THE LOADING ZONE. THERE IS NOT ENOUGH | | | CLEARANCE FOR THE CAR TO EXIT PARKING STALL. | | | 9. PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING ON SITE AND INCLUDE BICYCLE | | | PARKING CALCULATION IN SITE CALCULATION TABLE. PURSUANT | | | ZLDR SEC. 94-485(Q)(1), NUMBER OF SPACES REQUIRED. ONE | | | BICYCLE PARKING SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EVERY 20 | | | AUTOMOBILE PARKING SPACES. | | | 10. PROVIDE THE MASONRY WALL HEIGHT AROUND THE PROPOSED | | | HICKORY SMOKER OUTDOOR AREA. | | | 11. PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS AND SETBACKS OF THE CONCRETE | | | SLAB ON THE SITE PLAN. | | | 12. CLARIFY IF THERE WILL BE A ROOF OVER THE HICKORY | | | SMOKER AREA. BASED ON SHEET A200, IT APPEARS TO HAVE A | | | ROOF LINE ABOVE THE SMOKER AREA. | | | 13. PROVIDE A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN TO SHOW SITE LIGHTING | | | I.E. LOCATION, HEIGHT, AND INSENSITY OF OUTDOOR | | | LIGHTING. PURSUANT ZLDR SEC. 94-309(A) EXTERIOR | | | LIGHTING. ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO | | | REDUCE GLARE AND SHALL BE ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT OR | | | GLARE AWAY FROM ALL ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, | | | ADJACENT RESIDENCES, OR PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES. | | | ILLUMINATION OF SIGNS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE XIII OF THIS CHAPTER. | | | 14. INDICATE IF THERE WILL BE ROOFTOP | | | MATERIAL/EQUIPMENT ON THE STRUCTURE. IF SO, PROVIDE AN | | | ILLUSTRATION WITHIN PLAN SET. | | | 15. PROVIDE THE TYPE OF EXISITING FENCE ON SITE PLAN | | | (CHAIN LINKED, WOOD, MASONRY, ETC). | | | | | | ________________________________________ | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: | | | | | | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL | | | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. | | | | | | B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X | | | 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. | | | | | | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE | | | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE | | | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL | | | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. | | | | | | ________________________________________ | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | RACHEL FALCONE, ASSOCIATE PLANNER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 | | | | | | P: 561.822.1442 | | | TTY: 800.955.8771 | | | E: [email protected] | | | | | | W: WPB.ORG | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |