Plan Review Details - Project Z20020009
Plan Review Stops For Project Z20020009
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 03-11-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 03-11-2020 Time 20:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 03-11-2020 Time 20:05 Sent To  
Notes
2020-03-11 20:10:42DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. THE ADDITION TO THE EXISTING BUILDING IS COVERED BY
 CHAPTER 11 OF THE FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING CODE. THE
 HEIGHT AND/OR AREA INCREASE DUE TO THE PROPOSED
 ADDITION SHALL NOT INCREASE THE TOTAL BUILDING HEIGHT
 AND/OR AREA BEYOND THAT ALLOWED UNDER THE APPLICABLE
 PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
 FOR THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION USED.
  
 3. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS,
 FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS,
 GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE,
 SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 4. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
 AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
 CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
 THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.
  
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  

Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 4 Status P Date 04-04-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 04-04-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 04-04-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-04-04 09:08:04PASSED WITH PROVISOS:
  
 -DID NOT SEE LANDSCAPING PLAN IN RESUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS
 ? PLEASE VERIFY TREES HAVE SUFFICIENT CLEARANCE
 DISTANCE FROM WATER UTILITIES.
  
 -BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES MAY NOT BE LOCATED IN UTILITY
 EASEMENTS. THERE ARE SEVERAL CASES OF THAT CONFLICT ON
 WATER PLAN.
  
 -RELOCATION OF PROPOSED IRRIGATION METER WILL BE
 REVIEWED AT FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL TO DETERMINE
 IF NEW TAP WILL BE REQUIRED.
  
 -DOMESTIC AND IRRIGATION METERS MAY NOT BE USED TO
 PROVIDE WATER FOR FIRE SPRINKLERS. SEPARATE DEDICATED
 FIRE SERVICE LINE WITH DETECTOR METER IS NEEDED.
  
 -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL: 1) ADD PIPE MATERIAL
 TYPE TO LABEL FOR NEW 2 INCH WATER SERVICE. 2) ADD
 LABEL TO EXISTING WATER SERVICE FOR 1 METER WITH PIPE
 SIZE AND MATERIAL TYPE.
  
 RESPECTFULLY,
  
 MARK HURLEY
 FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC UTILITIES
 561-822-2262
  
  

Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 3 Status F Date 03-24-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 03-24-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 03-24-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-03-24 13:52:16THERE ARE NO RESPONSES TO OUR PREVIOUS ENGINEERING
 COMMENTS. PLEASE ADDRESS PREVIOUSLY UNADDRESSED
 ENGINEERING COMMENTS AND PROVIDE UPDATED ENGINEERING
 PLANS.

Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 12-31-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 12-31-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 12-31-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-12-31 12:44:251. PLEASE ADDRESS PRIOR COMMENTS 2 THROUGH 11.
 2. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS.
 3. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION OF WATER
 METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION.
 4. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES
 OF WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
 5. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING
 APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT
 SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING
 SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED
 LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
 6. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL CLEARLY LABEL ROAD
 RIGHT OF WAY.
 7. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO
 PROVIDE 50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH
 SIDE OF PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY
 AREAS PER CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-9.
 8. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SHOW WATER TAP
 STRAIGHT ON TO PROPERTY FROM CITY WATER MAIN.
 9. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, LIST WATER, SEWER
 AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS ON DRAWINGS.
 10. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE SHOW BOTH
 EXISTING AND PROPOSED PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS ON
 PLANS.
 11. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, UPDATE ALL CITY
 OF WPB STANDARD DETAILS TO MOST CURRENT VERSIONS.
 12. PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING.
 13. PLEASE LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE
 APPLICABLE.
 14. PLEASE PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED
 LOCATION OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION.
 15. PLEASE UPDATE PAVEMENT RESTORATION NOTE TO COMPLY
 WITH CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8.
 16. COORDINATE WITH MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE
 SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING
 PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT
 HIM AT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]
 17. PROVIDE DEDICATED UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS
 FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS.
  
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS. RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR,
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT (561) 494-1098
 [email protected]
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD
 CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES,
 PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]:
 PLEASE CONFIRM PRIOR COMMENTS WERE ADDRESSED:
 PROPOSED TREE INSTALLATIONS SHOULD NOT BE WITHIN 5 FEET
 OF WATER UTILITIES.
 SHEET C-1:
 -CANNOT HAVE WATER METER BOX OR BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY IN
 DRIVEWAY. METER BOX, WATER SERVICE, AND BACKFLOW
 ASSEMBLIES WOULD NEED TO BE RELOCATED, OR PLAN DESIGN
 CHANGED TO RELOCATE DRIVEWAY , IN ORDER TO ELIMINATE
 THAT CONFLICT. IF RELOCATING WATER SERVICE, METER BOX
 SHOULD NOT BE IN A SIDEWALK.
 -NEED LABEL SIZE OF EXISTING METER, WATER SERVICE, &
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY.
 -EXISTING & PROPOSED WATER MAINS, METER BOXES, AND
 WATER SERVICE PIPE ON PROPERTY NEEDS TO BE IN UTILITY
 EASEMENTS. NOT SURE IF EXISTING WATER MAINS NEAR SOUTH
 SIDE AND EAST SIDE ARE ALREADY IN UTILITY EASEMENTS, OR
 IF THOSE NEED TO BE GRANTED WITH THE PROJECT. PROPERTY
 OWNER SHOULD NOT BUILD WITHIN UTILITY EASEMENT. ALONG
 EAST SIDE OF PROPERTY, THERE IS SOME PARKING LOT AND
 DUMPSTER AREA STRUCTURE THAT LOOKS LIKE IT WOULD
 INTRUDE INTO UTILITY EASEMENT ? IF THEY ARE PROPOSED
 AND NOT EXISTING THEY SHOULD BE RELOCATED.
 -NOT SURE IF THERE IS A STREET OR ANOTHER PROPERTY
 ALONG SOUTH PROPERTY LINE ? CAN THAT BE ADDED?
 -PLAN SAYS ASPHALT TO BE REMOVED AROUND AREA FROM
 PROPOSED 2? METER BOX, BUT IT DOES NOT SAY THE NEW
 SURFACE. REQUEST NOTATION SAYING NEW MATERIAL. PREFER
 GRASS AROUND METER BOXES.
 -HARD TO DETERMINE SURFACE OVER 2? TAP. REQUEST LABEL
 SHOWING IF THAT IS GRASS PARKWAY OR CONCRETE SIDEWALK.
 -DID NOT SEE A DEDICATED FIRELINE SERVICE. WILL THE
 BUILDING HAVE FIRE SPRINKLERS?
 -DID NOT SEE A FIRE HYDRANT ADJACENT PROPERTY. IS A
 FIRE HYDRANT REQUIRED TO BE ADJACENT PROPERTY?
 -DID NOT SEE WATER DEMAND CHART ? NEED ADD IT.
 -RECOMMEND DUAL/PARALLEL BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ON
 DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE SO RESTAURANT HAS WATER DURING
 BACKFLOW MAINTENANCE OR REPAIRS.
 -IF EXISTING BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ARE RELOCATED, THEY
 WOULD NEED TO BE REPLACED WITH NEW LEAD-FREE COMPLIANT
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES AND UNDERGO INSPECTION.
 SHEET C-4:
 -WATER SERVICE DETAILS ARE OLD ? SHOULD UPDATE TO
 NEWEST REVISION.
 NEW COMMENTS AS FOLLOWS:
 -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, METER BOXES ON
 PRIVATE PROPERTY NEED TO BE IN UTILITY EASEMENTS.
 SOUTHERN METER BOX MAY BE ADJUSTED SLIGHTLY SOUTH TO
 FALL WITHIN PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT.
 -WATER SERVICE TAP UNDER SIDEWALK WOULD LIKELY REQUIRE
 SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT.
 -DID NOT RECEIVE WRITTEN RESPONSES BACK FROM PRIOR
 COMMENTS IN MARCH2020. MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
 DEPENDING ON RESPONSES.
  

Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-05-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 03-05-2020 Time   Rev Time  
Received By rrossano Date 03-05-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-03-05 11:32:151. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS.
 2. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION OF WATER
 METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION.
 3. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES
 OF WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
 4. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING
 APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT
 SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING
 SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED
 LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
 5. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL CLEARLY LABEL ROAD
 RIGHT OF WAY.
 6. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS.
 7. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO
 PROVIDE 50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH
 SIDE OF PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY
 AREAS PER CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-9.
 8. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SHOW WATER TAP
 STRAIGHT ON TO PROPERTY FROM CITY WATER MAIN.
 9. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, LIST WATER, SEWER
 AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS ON DRAWINGS.
 10. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE SHOW BOTH
 EXISTING AND PROPOSED PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS ON
 PLANS.
 11. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, UPDATE ALL CITY
 OF WPB STANDARD DETAILS TO MOST CURRENT VERSIONS.
 12. PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING.
  
 FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER
 SERVICE SUPERVISOR
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-822-2262,
 [email protected]
  
 -PROPOSED TREE INSTALLATIONS SHOULD NOT BE WITHIN 5
 FEET OF WATER UTILITIES.
  
 SHEET C-1
 -CANNOT HAVE WATER METER BOX OR BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY IN
 DRIVEWAY. METER BOX, WATER SERVICE, AND BACKFLOW
 ASSEMBLIES WOULD NEED TO BE RELOCATED, OR PLAN DESIGN
 CHANGED TO RELOCATE DRIVEWAY , IN ORDER TO ELIMINATE
 THAT CONFLICT. IF RELOCATING WATER SERVICE, METER BOX
 SHOULD NOT BE IN A SIDEWALK.
 -NEED LABEL SIZE OF EXISTING METER, WATER SERVICE, &
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY.
 -EXISTING & PROPOSED WATER MAINS, METER BOXES, AND
 WATER SERVICE PIPE ON PROPERTY NEEDS TO BE IN UTILITY
 EASEMENTS. NOT SURE IF EXISTING WATER MAINS NEAR SOUTH
 SIDE AND EAST SIDE ARE ALREADY IN UTILITY EASEMENTS, OR
 IF THOSE NEED TO BE GRANTED WITH THE PROJECT. PROPERTY
 OWNER SHOULD NOT BUILD WITHIN UTILITY EASEMENT. ALONG
 EAST SIDE OF PROPERTY, THERE IS SOME PARKING LOT AND
 DUMPSTER AREA STRUCTURE THAT LOOKS LIKE IT WOULD
 INTRUDE INTO UTILITY EASEMENT ? IF THEY ARE PROPOSED
 AND NOT EXISTING THEY SHOULD BE RELOCATED.
 -NOT SURE IF THERE IS A STREET OR ANOTHER PROPERTY
 ALONG SOUTH PROPERTY LINE ? CAN THAT BE ADDED?
 -PLAN SAYS ASPHALT TO BE REMOVED AROUND AREA FROM
 PROPOSED 2 IN. METER BOX, BUT IT DOES NOT SAY THE NEW
 SURFACE. REQUEST NOTATION SAYING NEW MATERIAL. PREFER
 GRASS AROUND METER BOXES.
 -HARD TO DETERMINE SURFACE OVER 2 IN. TAP. REQUEST
 LABEL SHOWING IF THAT IS GRASS PARKWAY OR CONCRETE
 SIDEWALK.
 -DID NOT SEE A DEDICATED FIRELINE SERVICE. WILL THE
 BUILDING HAVE FIRE SPRINKLERS?
 -DID NOT SEE A FIRE HYDRANT ADJACENT PROPERTY. IS A
 FIRE HYDRANT REQUIRED TO BE ADJACENT PROPERTY?
 -DID NOT SEE WATER DEMAND CHART ? NEED ADD IT.
 -RECOMMEND DUAL/PARALLEL BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ON
 DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE SO RESTAURANT HAS WATER DURING
 BACKFLOW MAINTENANCE OR REPAIRS.
 -IF EXISTING BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ARE RELOCATED, THEY
 WOULD NEED TO BE REPLACED WITH NEW LEAD-FREE COMPLIANT
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES AND UNDERGO INSPECTION.
  
 SHEET C-4
 --WATER SERVICE DETAILS ARE OLD ? SHOULD UPDATE TO
 NEWEST REVISION.
  
  
 RICK ROSSANO
 PROJECT COORDINATOR
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
 (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402)
 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098
 MOBILE: (561) 246-9525
 FAX: (561) 494-1116
 EMAIL: [email protected]
 WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING
  

Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-06-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 03-06-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 03-06-2020 Time 10:48 Sent To  
Notes
2020-03-06 10:57:24THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE
 OCCUPANCY TYPE, PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE.
  
 THERE ARE INDICATIONS OF BBQ SMOKERS AND AN AREA THAT
 APPEARS TO BE WOOD STORAGE. PLEASE PROVIDE MANUFACTURES
 SPEC SHEET FOR THE SMOKERS AND WHAT TYPE OF WOOD WILL
 BE STORED AND HOW MUCH.
  
 THE ARE NO SMOKER VENT STACKS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS.
 THERE IS CONCERN OF SMOKE ENTERING THE STRUCTURE AS
 WELL AS THE SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD.
 PLEASE PROVIDE A REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED HOURS OF SMOKER
 OPERATION SMOKE MITIGATION TO AVOID CO ENTERING THE
 BUILDING, HEALTH ISSUES AND COMPLAINTS FROM AREA
 HOMEOWNERS AND BUSINESSES.
  
 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE
 LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER
 SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED.
  
 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 THERE WAS NO INDICATION OF THE NEAREST FIRE HYDRANT,
 PLEASE INCLUDE IT ON ALL CIVILS.
  
 9. IF APLLICABLE, PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR
 FIRE ALARM PER THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY
 LIFE SAFETY ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 FIRE ALARM, ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF
 FS 61G AND SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PERMIT.
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR THE OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
 EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
 PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
 SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE
 SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY
 DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  

Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 04-29-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 04-29-2021 Time 10:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 04-29-2021 Time 10:05 Sent To  
Notes
2021-04-29 10:05:42FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 2400 S DIXIE Z20020009
 APRIL 29, 2021
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION CHART OF THE
 TREES WITHIN THE AFFECTED AREA AND INDICATE IF THEY
 WILL BE PRESERVED IN PLACE, RELOCATED OR REMOVED. LIST
 THE BOTANICAL NAME AND PROVIDE THE CANOPY DIAMETER.
 CALCULATE THE REQUIRED MITIGATION IN SQUARE FOOTAGE.
 ? SATISFIED. SHOW CALCULATIONS FOR CANOPY SQUARE
 FOOTAGE BASED ON DIAMETER, 1:1 SAME CATEGORY IF UNDER
 20 FEET, ACTUAL AREA 20 FEET OR MORE WITHIN THE
 DISPOSITION CHART.
 FICUS BENJAMINA DO NOT REQUIRE MITIGATION, AS THEY ARE
 UNMAINTAINED HEDGES, NOT TREES. CRAPE MYRTLE ARE
 CATEGORY 3 AT 100 SQ FT MITIGATION DUE EACH. SABAL PALM
 IS CATEGORY 3 AT 100 SQ FT ALSO.
  
 ? SATISFIED. ADD THE SUM OF ALL TREE CANOPY MITIGATION
 TO SHOW THE TOTAL MITIGATION DUE.
 RECALCULATE BASED ON NEW MITIGATION FIGURES.
  
 ? SATISFIED. SHOW THE MITIGATION PROVIDED CALCULATION
 FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED WITH THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN.
  
 2. SATISFIED. SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR MINIMUM SHADE
 TREE AND FLOWERING TREE REQUIREMENTS PER SECTION
 94-443(C)(2)B. BASED ON REQUIRED OPEN SPACE OF 40%.
 THIS SHOULD BE 11,392 SQ FT.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TERMINAL ISLANDS
 WITH FEET INTERIOR LANDSCAPE WIDTH AT THE END OF EACH
 ROW OF PARKING. NEW PARKING MUST INCLUDE REQUIRED
 TERMINAL ISLANDS, AND ANY INTERIOR ISLANDS THAT ARE
 EXISTING CANNOT BE REDUCED TO BELOW REQUIRED WIDTH.
 NEW TERMINAL ISLANDS FOR NEW PARKING SPACES DO NOT MEET
 THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE 2 NEW SPACES WEST OF PROPOSED
 DUMPSTER, AND SOUTH OF PROPOSED DUMPSTER.
  
 NEWLY CREATED PARKING SPACES ALONG THE EAST BUFFER
 BEHIND THE BUILDING REQUIRE THE 8 FOOT LANDSCAPE AREA
 WIDTH INCLUDING THE 5 FOOT BUFFER AT THE NORTH END OF
 THE ROW OF PARKING, AND A LANDSCAPE TERMINAL ISLAND
 WITH 8 FOOT WIDTH INSIDE CURB ON THE SOUTH END OF THE
 ROW. THE ROW OF PARKING ADJACENT TO THE DUMPSTER ALSO
 REQUIRES THE TERMINAL ISLAND.
  
  
 4. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A
 MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO
 BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING
 AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE
 PERCENTAGE OF CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR THE
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS.
  
 5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING
 LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS.
  
 6. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF REQUIRED 5 FOOT
 LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ON THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
 PER SECTION 94-443(D).
  
 TWO NEW PARKING SPACES DO NOT LEAVE A 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE
 BUFFER BETWEEN THE PROPERTY LINE AND PROPOSED PARKING.
 THIS ALSO DOES NOT MEET THE TERMINAL ISLAND REQUIREMENT
 OF 8 FEET PER COMMENT #3.
  
 7. SATISFIED. EAST BUFFER IS SHORT ON MEETING THE 9
 TREES REQUIRED, MAY NEED TO ADD 2 PALMS.
  
 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE HEDGES TO SCREEN ALL PARKING
 AREAS FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND STREETS.
  
 INDICATE AND LABEL ANY EXISTING HEDGES TO REMAIN.
  
 9. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL REQUIRED CURBS ADJACENT TO
 LANDSCAPE AREAS PER SECTION 94-443 (C)(5). THERE APPEAR
 TO BE AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT ARE NOT SHOWING
 CURBS TO MATCH THE SITE AND ENGINEERING PLANS.
 CURBS ARE NOT SHOWN FOR ALL AREAS OF NEW PARKING.
  
 10. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL PROPOSED WATER,
 SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. IT
 APPEARS THAT THERE ARE CONFLICTS WITH REQUIRED TREES.
  
 11. SATISFIED. IDENTIFY THE OBJECT IN THE LANDSCAPE
 ISLAND TO THE LEFT OF PROPOSED ENTRANCE FROM S DIXIE.
  
 12. SATISFIED. MODIFY THE PLANT LIST TO ADD COLUMNS FOR
 NATIVE PLANT AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVELS TO PROVIDE
 EASIER REFERENCE.
  
  
 13. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
 PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
 MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
 PROVIDE THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST.
  
 14. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH
 LANDSCAPING.
  
 15. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DETAIL AND LOCATIONS OF ROOT
 BARRIERS TO SEPARATE LANDSCAPING FROM UTILITY LINES.
  
 16. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 VALVES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
  
 17. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING
 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH
 TREES.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 1/15/21:
 18. SATISFIED. NORTH BUFFER HAS ONLY ONE QUALIFYING
 SILVER BUTTONWOOD TREE, PALMS IN RIGHT OF WAY DO NOT
 COUNT.
  
 19. SATISFIED. SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN DO NOT
 MATCH. PROBLEMS WITH SCALE ON SITE PLAN.
  
 20. SATISFIED. PARKING SPACES CAN BE 16 FEET OF PAVED
 AREA WITH A 6 INCH CURB AND OVERHANG OF 1.5 FEET THAT
 WOULD ADD LANDSCAPE AREA AND MAY BE MORE ECONOMICAL
 THAN THE ADDITIONAL PAVING AND REQUIRED WHEEL STOP.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 3/26/21:
 21. SATISFIED. THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE REQUIRES A HEDGE
 ON THE THREE NON-ACCESS SIDES. ONLY ONE SIDE MEETS THE
 REQUIREMENT.
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  

Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 03-26-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 03-26-2021 Time 16:07 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 03-26-2021 Time 16:07 Sent To  
Notes
2021-03-26 16:07:36FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 2400 S DIXIE Z20020009
 MARCH 26, 2021
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION CHART OF THE
 TREES WITHIN THE AFFECTED AREA AND INDICATE IF THEY
 WILL BE PRESERVED IN PLACE, RELOCATED OR REMOVED. LIST
 THE BOTANICAL NAME AND PROVIDE THE CANOPY DIAMETER.
 CALCULATE THE REQUIRED MITIGATION IN SQUARE FOOTAGE.
 ? SATISFIED. SHOW CALCULATIONS FOR CANOPY SQUARE
 FOOTAGE BASED ON DIAMETER, 1:1 SAME CATEGORY IF UNDER
 20 FEET, ACTUAL AREA 20 FEET OR MORE WITHIN THE
 DISPOSITION CHART.
 FICUS BENJAMINA DO NOT REQUIRE MITIGATION, AS THEY ARE
 UNMAINTAINED HEDGES, NOT TREES. CRAPE MYRTLE ARE
 CATEGORY 3 AT 100 SQ FT MITIGATION DUE EACH. SABAL PALM
 IS CATEGORY 3 AT 100 SQ FT ALSO.
  
 ? SATISFIED. ADD THE SUM OF ALL TREE CANOPY MITIGATION
 TO SHOW THE TOTAL MITIGATION DUE.
 RECALCULATE BASED ON NEW MITIGATION FIGURES.
  
 ? SATISFIED. SHOW THE MITIGATION PROVIDED CALCULATION
 FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED WITH THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN.
  
 2. SATISFIED. SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR MINIMUM SHADE
 TREE AND FLOWERING TREE REQUIREMENTS PER SECTION
 94-443(C)(2)B. BASED ON REQUIRED OPEN SPACE OF 40%.
 THIS SHOULD BE 11,392 SQ FT.
  
 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TERMINAL
 ISLANDS WITH FEET INTERIOR LANDSCAPE WIDTH AT THE END
 OF EACH ROW OF PARKING. NEW PARKING MUST INCLUDE
 REQUIRED TERMINAL ISLANDS, AND ANY INTERIOR ISLANDS
 THAT ARE EXISTING CANNOT BE REDUCED TO BELOW REQUIRED
 WIDTH.
 NEW TERMINAL ISLANDS FOR NEW PARKING SPACES DO NOT MEET
 THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE 2 NEW SPACES WEST OF PROPOSED
 DUMPSTER, AND SOUTH OF PROPOSED DUMPSTER.
  
 NEWLY CREATED PARKING SPACES ALONG THE EAST BUFFER
 BEHIND THE BUILDING REQUIRE THE 8 FOOT LANDSCAPE AREA
 WIDTH INCLUDING THE 5 FOOT BUFFER AT THE NORTH END OF
 THE ROW OF PARKING, AND A LANDSCAPE TERMINAL ISLAND
 WITH 8 FOOT WIDTH INSIDE CURB ON THE SOUTH END OF THE
 ROW. THE ROW OF PARKING ADJACENT TO THE DUMPSTER ALSO
 REQUIRES THE TERMINAL ISLAND.
  
  
 4. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A
 MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO
 BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING
 AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE
 PERCENTAGE OF CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR THE
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS.
  
 5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING
 LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS.
  
 6. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF REQUIRED 5 FOOT
 LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ON THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
 PER SECTION 94-443(D).
  
 TWO NEW PARKING SPACES DO NOT LEAVE A 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE
 BUFFER BETWEEN THE PROPERTY LINE AND PROPOSED PARKING.
 THIS ALSO DOES NOT MEET THE TERMINAL ISLAND REQUIREMENT
 OF 8 FEET PER COMMENT #3.
  
 7. SATISFIED. EAST BUFFER IS SHORT ON MEETING THE 9
 TREES REQUIRED, MAY NEED TO ADD 2 PALMS.
  
 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE HEDGES TO SCREEN ALL PARKING
 AREAS FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND STREETS.
  
 INDICATE AND LABEL ANY EXISTING HEDGES TO REMAIN.
  
 9. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW ALL REQUIRED CURBS
 ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPE AREAS PER SECTION 94-443 (C)(5).
 THERE APPEAR TO BE AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT ARE
 NOT SHOWING CURBS TO MATCH THE SITE AND ENGINEERING
 PLANS.
 CURBS ARE NOT SHOWN FOR ALL AREAS OF NEW PARKING.
  
 10. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL PROPOSED WATER,
 SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. IT
 APPEARS THAT THERE ARE CONFLICTS WITH REQUIRED TREES.
  
 11. SATISFIED. IDENTIFY THE OBJECT IN THE LANDSCAPE
 ISLAND TO THE LEFT OF PROPOSED ENTRANCE FROM S DIXIE.
  
 12. SATISFIED. MODIFY THE PLANT LIST TO ADD COLUMNS FOR
 NATIVE PLANT AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVELS TO PROVIDE
 EASIER REFERENCE.
  
  
 13. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
 PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
 MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
 PROVIDE THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST.
  
 14. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH
 LANDSCAPING.
  
 15. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DETAIL AND LOCATIONS OF ROOT
 BARRIERS TO SEPARATE LANDSCAPING FROM UTILITY LINES.
  
 16. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 VALVES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
  
 17. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING
 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH
 TREES.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 1/15/21:
 18. SATISFIED. NORTH BUFFER HAS ONLY ONE QUALIFYING
 SILVER BUTTONWOOD TREE, PALMS IN RIGHT OF WAY DO NOT
 COUNT.
  
 19. SATISFIED. SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN DO NOT
 MATCH. PROBLEMS WITH SCALE ON SITE PLAN.
  
 20. SATISFIED. PARKING SPACES CAN BE 16 FEET OF PAVED
 AREA WITH A 6 INCH CURB AND OVERHANG OF 1.5 FEET THAT
 WOULD ADD LANDSCAPE AREA AND MAY BE MORE ECONOMICAL
 THAN THE ADDITIONAL PAVING AND REQUIRED WHEEL STOP.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 3/26/21:
 21. THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE REQUIRES A HEDGE ON THE
 THREE NON-ACCESS SIDES. ONLY ONE SIDE MEETS THE
 REQUIREMENT.
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  

Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-15-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 01-15-2021 Time 16:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 01-15-2021 Time 16:02 Sent To  
Notes
2021-01-15 16:03:20FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 2400 S DIXIE Z20020009
 JANUARY 15, 2021
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION
 CHART OF THE TREES WITHIN THE AFFECTED AREA AND
 INDICATE IF THEY WILL BE PRESERVED IN PLACE, RELOCATED
 OR REMOVED. LIST THE BOTANICAL NAME AND PROVIDE THE
 CANOPY DIAMETER. CALCULATE THE REQUIRED MITIGATION IN
 SQUARE FOOTAGE.
 ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW CALCULATIONS FOR CANOPY
 SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED ON DIAMETER, 1:1 SAME CATEGORY IF
 UNDER 20 FEET, ACTUAL AREA 20 FEET OR MORE WITHIN THE
 DISPOSITION CHART.
 FICUS BENJAMINA DO NOT REQUIRE MITIGATION, AS THEY ARE
 UNMAINTAINED HEDGES, NOT TREES. CRAPE MYRTLE ARE
 CATEGORY 3 AT 100 SQ FT MITIGATION DUE EACH. SABAL PALM
 IS CATEGORY 3 AT 100 SQ FT ALSO.
  
 ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ADD THE SUM OF ALL TREE CANOPY
 MITIGATION TO SHOW THE TOTAL MITIGATION DUE.
 RECALCULATE BASED ON NEW MITIGATION FIGURES.
  
 ? SATISFIED. SHOW THE MITIGATION PROVIDED CALCULATION
 FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED WITH THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN.
  
 2. SATISFIED. SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR MINIMUM SHADE
 TREE AND FLOWERING TREE REQUIREMENTS PER SECTION
 94-443(C)(2)B. BASED ON REQUIRED OPEN SPACE OF 40%.
 THIS SHOULD BE 11,392 SQ FT.
  
 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TERMINAL
 ISLANDS WITH FEET INTERIOR LANDSCAPE WIDTH AT THE END
 OF EACH ROW OF PARKING. NEW PARKING MUST INCLUDE
 REQUIRED TERMINAL ISLANDS, AND ANY INTERIOR ISLANDS
 THAT ARE EXISTING CANNOT BE REDUCED TO BELOW REQUIRED
 WIDTH.
 NEW TERMINAL ISLANDS FOR NEW PARKING SPACES DO NOT MEET
 THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE 2 NEW SPACES WEST OF PROPOSED
 DUMPSTER, AND SOUTH OF PROPOSED DUMPSTER.
  
  
 4. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A
 MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO
 BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING
 AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE
 PERCENTAGE OF CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR THE
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS.
  
 5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING
 LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS.
  
 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF REQUIRED
 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ON THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE
 PLAN PER SECTION 94-443(D).
  
 TWO NEW PARKING SPACES DO NOT LEAVE A 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE
 BUFFER BETWEEN THE PROPERTY LINE AND PROPOSED PARKING.
 THIS ALSO DOES NOT MEET THE TERMINAL ISLAND REQUIREMENT
 OF 8 FEET PER COMMENT #3.
  
 7. SATISFIED. EAST BUFFER IS SHORT ON MEETING THE 9
 TREES REQUIRED, MAY NEED TO ADD 2 PALMS.
  
 8. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE HEDGES TO SCREEN ALL
 PARKING AREAS FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND STREETS.
  
 INDICATE AND LABEL ANY EXISTING HEDGES TO REMAIN.
  
 9. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW ALL REQUIRED CURBS
 ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPE AREAS PER SECTION 94-443 (C)(5).
 THERE APPEAR TO BE AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT ARE
 NOT SHOWING CURBS TO MATCH THE SITE AND ENGINEERING
 PLANS.
 CURBS ARE NOT SHOWN FOR ALL AREAS OF NEW PARKING.
  
 10. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL PROPOSED WATER,
 SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. IT
 APPEARS THAT THERE ARE CONFLICTS WITH REQUIRED TREES.
  
 11. SATISFIED. IDENTIFY THE OBJECT IN THE LANDSCAPE
 ISLAND TO THE LEFT OF PROPOSED ENTRANCE FROM S DIXIE.
  
 12. SATISFIED. MODIFY THE PLANT LIST TO ADD COLUMNS FOR
 NATIVE PLANT AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVELS TO PROVIDE
 EASIER REFERENCE.
  
  
 13. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
 PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
 MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
 PROVIDE THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST.
  
 14. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH
 LANDSCAPING.
  
 15. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DETAIL AND LOCATIONS OF ROOT
 BARRIERS TO SEPARATE LANDSCAPING FROM UTILITY LINES.
  
 16. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 VALVES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
  
 17. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING
 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH
 TREES.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 1/15/21:
 18. NORTH BUFFER HAS ONLY ONE QUALIFYING SILVER
 BUTTONWOOD TREE, PALMS IN RIGHT OF WAY DO NOT COUNT.
  
 19. SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN DO NOT MATCH. PROBLEMS
 WITH SCALE ON SITE PLAN.
  
 20. PARKING SPACES CAN BE 16 FEET OF PAVED AREA WITH A
 6 INCH CURB AND OVERHANG OF 1.5 FEET THAT WOULD ADD
 LANDSCAPE AREA AND MAY BE MORE ECONOMICAL THAN THE
 ADDITIONAL PAVING AND REQUIRED WHEEL STOP.
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  

Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-11-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 03-11-2020 Time 11:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 03-11-2020 Time 11:45 Sent To  
Notes
2020-03-11 11:46:03FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 2400 S DIXIE Z20020009
 MARCH 11, 2020
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION CHART OF THE TREES WITHIN
 THE AFFECTED AREA AND INDICATE IF THEY WILL BE
 PRESERVED IN PLACE, RELOCATED OR REMOVED. LIST THE
 BOTANICAL NAME AND PROVIDE THE CANOPY DIAMETER.
 CALCULATE THE REQUIRED MITIGATION IN SQUARE FOOTAGE.
 ? SHOW CALCULATIONS FOR CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED ON
 DIAMETER, 1:1 SAME CATEGORY IF UNDER 20 FEET, ACTUAL
 AREA 20 FEET OR MORE WITHIN THE DISPOSITION CHART.
 ? ADD THE SUM OF ALL TREE CANOPY MITIGATION TO SHOW THE
 TOTAL MITIGATION DUE.
 ? SHOW THE MITIGATION PROVIDED CALCULATION FOR ALL
 TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED WITH THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 2. SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR MINIMUM SHADE TREE AND
 FLOWERING TREE REQUIREMENTS PER SECTION 94-443(C)(2)B.
 BASED ON REQUIRED OPEN SPACE OF 40%. THIS SHOULD BE
 11,392 SQ FT.
  
 3. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TERMINAL ISLANDS WITH 8 FEET
 INTERIOR LANDSCAPE WIDTH AT THE END OF EACH ROW OF
 PARKING. NEW PARKING MUST INCLUDE REQUIRED TERMINAL
 ISLANDS, AND ANY INTERIOR ISLANDS THAT ARE EXISTING
 CANNOT BE REDUCED TO BELOW REQUIRED WIDTH.
  
 4. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A MINIMUM OF 75
 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED
 WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING AREA SHALL
 BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE OF
 CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE
 AREAS.
  
 5. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING LANDSCAPE AREAS
 COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-443(C)(3) AND
 (4) AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS.
  
 6. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF REQUIRED 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE
 BUFFERS ON THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN PER SECTION
 94-443(D).
  
 7. EAST BUFFER IS SHORT ON MEETING THE 9 TREES
 REQUIRED, MAY NEED TO ADD 2 PALMS.
  
 8. PROVIDE HEDGES TO SCREEN ALL PARKING AREAS FROM
 ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND STREETS.
  
 9. SHOW ALL REQUIRED CURBS ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPE AREAS
 PER SECTION 94-443 (C)(5). THERE APPEAR TO BE AREAS ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT ARE NOT SHOWING CURBS TO MATCH
 THE SITE AND ENGINEERING PLANS.
  
 10. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL PROPOSED WATER, SEWER AND
 DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. IT APPEARS THAT
 THERE ARE CONFLICTS WITH REQUIRED TREES.
  
 11. IDENTIFY THE OBJECT IN THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND TO THE
 LEFT OF PROPOSED ENTRANCE FROM S DIXIE.
  
 12. MODIFY THE PLANT LIST TO ADD COLUMNS FOR NATIVE
 PLANT AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVELS TO PROVIDE EASIER
 REFERENCE.
  
  
 13. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT
 SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL
 ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT
 SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF
 SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA
 WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA
 LANDSCAPES.
 PROVIDE THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST.
  
 14. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
  
 15. PROVIDE A DETAIL AND LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO
 SEPARATE LANDSCAPING FROM UTILITY LINES.
  
 16. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED VALVES AND
 EQUIPMENT.
  
  
 17. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH TREES.
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  

Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 3 Status P Date 03-12-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 03-12-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 03-12-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-03-12 15:52:50NO FURTHER COMMENTS FROM DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]

Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 2 Status F Date 12-31-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 12-31-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 12-31-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-12-31 13:46:30 
 PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING:
  
 1- REVISED ENCLOSURE SPEC. SHEETS (A002 AND C-5) TO
 REFLECT THE CORRECT (LATEST) REVISION OF THE ENCLOSURE
 SPECS., DATED OCTOBER 2020. FOR A FREESTANDING SITE
 DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, THE ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
 LATEST REVISION OF CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL
 CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE STANDARD, CG-8.
 2- AUTO TURN (DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE TIRES PATH) FOR
 THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER TRUCK WITH THE
 FOLLOWING SPECS:
 - TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT
 - TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT
 - TURNING RADIUS:
 - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT
 - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT
 - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045

Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-09-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 03-09-2020 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 03-09-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-03-09 11:33:59PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING:
  
 1- REVISED ENCLOSURE SPEC. SHEETS (A002 AND C-3) TO
 REFLECT THE CORRECT
 REVISION OF THE ENCLOSURE SPECS. FOR A FREESTANDING
 SITE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, THE ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY
 WITH THE LATEST REVISION OF CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE STANDARD, CG-8.
 2- AUTO TURN FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER
 TRUCK WITH THE
 FOLLOWING SPECS:
 - TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT
 - TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT
 - TURNING RADIUS:
 - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT
 - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT
 - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045

Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 6 Status P Date 02-16-2022 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 02-16-2022 Time 10:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 02-16-2022 Time 11:21 Sent To  
Notes
2022-02-16 11:21:19THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE ON THE PROPOSED DRAWINGS FOR
 THE MINOR AMENDMENT TO THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED
 2/15/2022.
  
 1. REVIEW PROPOSED GRADE OF 13.00 FT NAVD ADJACENT TO
 THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND IN THE MIDDLE OF THE EAST PARKING
 SPACES. THERE IS A PROPOSED GRADE OF 13.50 FT NAVD AT
 THE NOSE OF THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND.
  
 2. SUGGEST GRADING HANDICAP ACCESS ISLAND BEHIND THE
 DUMPSTER TO NOT DRAIN TO THE DUMSPSTER PAD.
  
 3. PEDESTRIAN CROSSING FOR EAST HANDICAP PARKING SPACE
 MAY NOT BE PERMISSABLE BECAUSE IT IS LOCATED BEHIND A
 PARKING SPACE. CHECK WITH THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
  
 4. WHY THE CURVY CURBING BETWEEN THE DUMPSTER AND
 PARKING BEHIND THE BUILDING.
  
 5. LIGHT POLES SHOULD NOT BE PLACED WITHIN THE 2-FOOT
 LANDSCAPE OVERHANG OF PARKING SPACES.
  
 ***** THESE COMMENTS WERE COPIED OVER TO Z22020030.
 *****
  
 TRACY WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 [email protected]
 561-494-1120
  
  

Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 5 Status P Date 05-18-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 05-18-2021 Time 14:07 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 05-18-2021 Time 14:07 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 4 Status F Date 05-03-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 05-03-2021 Time 18:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 05-03-2021 Time 21:30 Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-03 21:30:17THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 4/21/2021 AND 4/26/2021 SUBMITTALS.
  
  
 1. [SATISFIED] LANDSCAPE PLANS WERE NOT PROVIDED
 PREVIOUS COMMENT:THE ENGINEERING AND LANDSCAPE PLANS DO
 NOT MATCH THE SITE PLAN.
  
 2. [SATISFIED] ADD FLOW ARROWS TO THE ENGINEERING PLAN
 TO SHOW SURFACE WATER RUNOFF DIRECTION.
  
 3. [SATISFIED] AVOID PUTTING UTILITIES UNDER LANDSCAPE
 ISLANDS.
  
 4. [SATISFIED] TWO FOOT OVERHANG WITH 16-FOOT DEEP
 PARKING SPACES SHOWN ON WEST SIDE OT PARKING LOT.
 18-FOOT LONG SPACES SHOWN FOR PARKING SPACES ON EAST
 SIDE OF PARKING LOT. THE EAST SIDE PARKING SPACES COULD
 BE REDUCED BY TWO FEET TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE TWO
 -FOOT LANDSCAPE OVERHANG. PREVIOUS COMMENT: CONSIDER
 CREATING 2 FOOT OVERHANGS INTO LANDSCAPE AREAS FOR
 PARKING SPACES. TWO-FOOT OVERHANG NO LONGER SHOWN ON
 SITE PLAN. PAVED AREA OF PARKING SPACES ARE DIMENSIONED
 AS 18' LONG.
  
 5. [SATISFIED] CATCH BASIN GRATE ELEVATIONS APPEAR TO
 BE HIGHER THAN SOME ADJACENT PARKING LOT GRADES.
  
 6. [SATISFIED] THE TRAVEL LANE SPACE BETWEEN THE
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN APPEARS TOO
 NARROW FOR TWO WAY TRAFFIC.
  
 7. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE BOTTOM ELEVATION OF EXISTING
 ONSITE DRAINAGE STRUCTURES THAT ARE TO REMAIN. [ALL
 EXISTING STRUCTURES ARE BEING REMOVED]
  
 8. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] CHECK WITH RAY CRANCI,
 LANDSCAPE PLANNER ON WHERE ADDITIONAL CURBING MAY BE
 NEEDED FOR LANDSCAPE AREAS. PREVIOUS COMMENT: CURBING
 NEEDED FOR NARROW PARKING AREAS NORTH OF THE LANDSCAPE
 ISLANDS. [CURBING SHOWN ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN]
  
 9. [NOT SATISFIED] SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLANS TO VERIFY NO CONFLICTS WITH THE PLANTING PLAN AND
 TO IDENTIFY WHERE ROOT BARRIERS MAY BE NEEDED.
 PREVIOOUS COMMENTS: LANDSCAPE PLANS NOT INCLUDED IN
 THESE SUBMITTALS. SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 10. [NOT SATISFIED] LANDSCPAE PLANS NOT PROVIDED IN
 THESE SUBMITTALS. PREVKIOUS COMMENT: SCALES SHOULD
 MATCH FOR SURVEY, ENGINEERING PLANS AND LANDSCAPE
 PLANS.
  
 11. SHEET A001 PROPOSED SITE PLAN
 A. [NOT SATISFIED] THE INCORRECT FLOOD ZONE IS NOW
 SHOWN ON SHEET A000. PREVIOUS COMMENT: UPDATE THE FLOOD
 ZONE INFORMATION (SEE THE BOUNDARY SURVEY).
 B. [SATISFIED] A STANDARD PARKING SPACE IS 8.5' X 18'.
 B.1. [NOT SATISFIED] THE STRIPING FOR PARKING SPACES
 APPEAR TO BE LONGER THAN THAN THE PARKING SPACE DEPTHS
 (16 FEET OR 18 FEET) .
 B.2. [SATISFIED] THERE IS THE OPPORTUNITY TO REDUCE THE
 AMOUNT OF ASPHALT AND PARKING LOT RECONSTRUCTION BY
 REDUCING THE LENGTH OF THE PARKING SPACES BY 2 FEET,
 INCREASING THE LANDSCAPING BY TWO FEET, REDUCE THE
 MOUNT OF STORMWATER RUNOFF AND PERHAPS REPLACING THE
 WHEEL STOPS FITH TYPE 'D' CURB. PREVIOUS COMMENT: THERE
 IS 2' PARKING OVERLAP WITH LANDSCAPING CALLED OUT FOR
 THE TEN PARKING SPACES ALONG THE BACK OF THE PARKING
 LOT. THESE PARKING SPACES ARE SHOWN TO BE 18 FEET LONG
 SO THE OVERLAP IS NOT REQUIRED.
 B.3. [NOT SATISFIED - OPTIONAL]THE DRIVE AISLE IS
 DIMENSIONED TO BE 26' 6.5" WIDE. IT CAN BE NARROWED TO
 24 FEET. CONSIDERING THIS NARROWING AND PROVIDING THE
 2' PARKING OVERLAP CAN MOVE THE EAST EDGE OF THE
 PARKING LOT TO THE WEST BY MORE THAN 4.5 FEET.
 C. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE THE VERTICAL DATUM FOR THE
 FFE. IT SHOULD MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE ENGINEERING
 PLAN.
 D. [NOT SATISFIED] SHOW STOP BARS AND STOP SIGNS.
 E. [NOT SATISFIED] SHOW PARALLEL PARKING SPACES
 (STRIPING) ALONG S. DIXIE HWY.
  
 12. SHEET C-1 SITE PAVING & DRAINAGE PLAN
 A. [SATISFIED] REPLACE THE DROP CURB WITH TYPE 'F' CURB
 AND GUTTER IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING ALONG S. DIXIE HWY.
 B. [SATISFIED] REPLACE THE SIDEWALK WITH 6" THICK
 SIDEWALK WHERE THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY IS BEING WIDENED.
 C. [SATISFIED] LABEL THE SLAB FOR THE BICYCLE RACK.
 D. [SATISFIED]LABEL THE LEFT PROPOSED WALKWAY IN FRONT
 OF THE BUILDING.
 E. [SATISFIED] CONNECT THE ROOF DRAIN(S) FOR THE
 PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION TO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. (CAN
 BE SHOWN AT TIME OF ENGINEERING PERMIT).
  
 13. [SATISFIED] SHEET C-3 PGD NOTES AND DETAILS -
 INVERT ELEVATION OF PIPE SHOWN IN THE EXFILTRATION
 TRENCH DETAIL DOES NOT MATCH THE INVERT ELEVATIONS
 SHOWN ON SHEET C-1.
  
 14. [SATISFIED] SHEET EC-1 SWPPP - SHOW BMPS FOR
 OFFSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS.
  
 15. SHEET A002 PARKING STALL STRIPING DETAIL:
 A. [SATISFIED] WHEEL STOPS ARE GENERALLY 2 FEET FROM
 THE END OF PARKING STALL.
 B. [NOT SATISFIED] GRADES SHOWN FOR HANDICAPP PARKING
 SPACE WOULD RESULT IN A FLAT (NO SLOPE) PARKING AREA
 AND STORMWATER RUNOFF WOULD NOT DRAIN OFF. GRADES ARE
 SHOWN ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN. LABEL THE VERTICAL DATUM
 ON SHEET A002.
  
 16. [NOT SATISFIED] FDOT APPROVAL WILL BE NEEDED BEFORE
 ENGINEERING PERMIT. PREVIOUS COMMENT: S. DIXIE HWY IS
 MAINTAINED BY FDOT. FDOT'S APPROVAL FOR WORK WITHIN THE
 RIGHT OF WAY WILL BE NEEDED.
  
 17. [SATISFIED] STOP SIGNS AND STOP BARS WILL BE NEEDED
 AT THE DRIVEWAY ENTRANCES.[CAN BE PROVIDED WITH
 ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL]
  
 18. [NOT SATISFIED] SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED PARKING
 ALONG S. DIXIE HWY. THE RESTRICTIVE PARKING SIGNS WILL
 NEED TO BE RELOCATED.
  
 19. NEW COMMENT] CIVIL PLANS SHOW A TYPE 'D' CURB ALONG
 THE BACK OF THE BUILDING. THE TOP OF CURB WILL BE
 ELEVATION 14.00 FEET NAVD, WHICH IS HIGHER THAN THE
 FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION OF 13.85 FEET NAVD. SHEET A102
 SHOWS SEVERAL DOORS OPENING OUT, WHICH WILL CONFLICT
 WITH THE CURB. ONE DOOR IS SHOWN TO BE FLUSH WITH THE
 ADJACENT PAVEMENT.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]

Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 3 Status F Date 04-06-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 04-06-2021 Time 18:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 04-06-2021 Time 20:34 Sent To  
Notes
2021-04-06 20:33:56THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 3/9/2021 AND 3/12/2021 SUBMITTALS.
  
  
 1. [NOT SATISFIED] LANDSCAPE PLANS WERE NOT PROVIDED
 PREVIOUS COMMENT:THE ENGINEERING AND LANDSCAPE PLANS DO
 NOT MATCH THE SITE PLAN.
  
 2. [SATISFIED] ADD FLOW ARROWS TO THE ENGINEERING PLAN
 TO SHOW SURFACE WATER RUNOFF DIRECTION.
  
 3. [SATISFIED] AVOID PUTTING UTILITIES UNDER LANDSCAPE
 ISLANDS.
  
 4. NOT SATISFIED - OPTIONAL] CONSIDER CREATING 2 FOOT
 OVERHANGS INTO LANDSCAPE AREAS FOR PARKING SPACES.
 TWO-FOOT OVERHANG NO LONGER SHOWN ON SITE PLAN. PAVED
 AREA OF PARKING SPACES ARE DIMENSIONED AS 18' LONG.
  
 5. [SATISFIED] CATCH BASIN GRATE ELEVATIONS APPEAR TO
 BE HIGHER THAN SOME ADJACENT PARKING LOT GRADES.
  
 6. [SATISFIED] THE TRAVEL LANE SPACE BETWEEN THE
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN APPEARS TOO
 NARROW FOR TWO WAY TRAFFIC.
  
 7. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE BOTTOM ELEVATION OF EXISTING
 ONSITE DRAINAGE STRUCTURES THAT ARE TO REMAIN. [ALL
 EXISTING STRUCTURES ARE BEING REMOVED]
  
 8. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] CHECK WITH RAY CRANCI,
 LANDSCAPE PLANNER ON WHERE ADDITIONAL CURBING MAY BE
 NEEDED FOR LANDSCAPE AREAS. PREVIOUS COMMENT: CURBING
 NEEDED FOR NARROW PARKING AREAS NORTH OF THE LANDSCAPE
 ISLANDS. [CURBING SHOWN ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN]
  
 9. [NOT SATISFIED] LANDSCAPE PLANS NOT INCLUDED IN
 THESE SUBMITTALS. PREVIOUS COMMENT: SHOW UTILITIES ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 10. [NOT SATISFIED] LANDSCPAE PLANS NOT PROVIDED IN
 THESE SUBMITTALS. PREVKIOUS COMMENT: SCALES SHOULD
 MATCH FOR SURVEY, ENGINEERING PLANS AND LANDSCAPE
 PLANS.
  
 11. SHEET A001 PROPOSED SITE PLAN
 A. [NOT SATISFIED] THE INCORRECT FLOOD ZONE IS NOW
 SHOWN ON SHEET A000. PREVIOUS COMMENT: UPDATE THE FLOOD
 ZONE INFORMATION (SEE THE BOUNDARY SURVEY).
 B. [SATISFIED] A STANDARD PARKING SPACE IS 8.5' X 18'.
 B.1. [NOT SATISFIED] THE STRIPING FOR PARKING SPACES
 FACING S. DIXIE HWY, THE TWO SPACES FACING VALENCIA
 ROAD AND THE FOUR PARKING SPACINGS BEHIND THE BUILDING
 APPEAR TO BE LONGER THAN 18 FEET.
 B.2. [SATISFIED] THERE IS THE OPPORTUNITY TO REDUCE THE
 AMOUNT OF ASPHALT AND PARKING LOT RECONSTRUCTION BY
 REDUCING THE LENGTH OF THE PARKING SPACES BY 2 FEET,
 INCREASING THE LANDSCAPING BY TWO FEET, REDUCE THE
 MOUNT OF STORMWATER RUNOFF AND PERHAPS REPLACING THE
 WHEEL STOPS FITH TYPE 'D' CURB. PREVIOUS COMMENT: THERE
 IS 2' PARKING OVERLAP WITH LANDSCAPING CALLED OUT FOR
 THE TEN PARKING SPACES ALONG THE BACK OF THE PARKING
 LOT. THESE PARKING SPACES ARE SHOWN TO BE 18 FEET LONG
 SO THE OVERLAP IS NOT REQUIRED.
 B.3. [NOT SATISFIED - OPTIONAL]THE DRIVE AISLE IS
 DIMENSIONED TO BE 26' 6.5" WIDE. IT CAN BE NARROWED TO
 24 FEET. CONSIDERING THIS NARROWING AND PROVIDING THE
 2' PARKING OVERLAP CAN MOVE THE EAST EDGE OF THE
 PARKING LOT TO THE WEST BY MORE THAN 4.5 FEET.
 C. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE THE VERTICAL DATUM FOR THE
 FFE. IT SHOULD MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE ENGINEERING
 PLAN.
 D. [NOT SATISFIED] SHOW STOP BARS AND STOP SIGNS.
 E. [NOT SATISFIED] SHOW PARALLEL PARKING SPACES
 (STRIPING) ALONG S. DIXIE HWY.
  
 12. SHEET C-1 SITE PAVING & DRAINAGE PLAN
 A. [SATISFIED] REPLACE THE DROP CURB WITH TYPE 'F' CURB
 AND GUTTER IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING ALONG S. DIXIE HWY.
 B. [SATISFIED] REPLACE THE SIDEWALK WITH 6" THICK
 SIDEWALK WHERE THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY IS BEING WIDENED.
 C. [SATISFIED] LABEL THE SLAB FOR THE BICYCLE RACK.
 D. [SATISFIED]LABEL THE LEFT PROPOSED WALKWAY IN FRONT
 OF THE BUILDING.
 E. [SATISFIED] CONNECT THE ROOF DRAIN(S) FOR THE
 PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION TO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. (CAN
 BE SHOWN AT TIME OF ENGINEERING PERMIT).
  
 13. [SATISFIED] SHEET C-3 PGD NOTES AND DETAILS -
 INVERT ELEVATION OF PIPE SHOWN IN THE EXFILTRATION
 TRENCH DETAIL DOES NOT MATCH THE INVERT ELEVATIONS
 SHOWN ON SHEET C-1.
  
 14. [SATISFIED] SHEET EC-1 SWPPP - SHOW BMPS FOR
 OFFSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS.
  
 15. SHEET A002 PARKING STALL STRIPING DETAIL:
 A. [SATISFIED] WHEEL STOPS ARE GENERALLY 2 FEET FROM
 THE END OF PARKING STALL.
 B. [NOT SATISFIED] GRADES SHOWN FOIR HANDICAPP PARKING
 SPACE WOULD RESULT IN A FLAT (NO SLOPE) PARKING AREA
 AND STORMWATER RUNOFF WOULD NOT DRAIN OFF. GRADES ARE
 SHOWN ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN. LABEL THE VERTICAL DATUM
 ON SHEET A002.
  
 16. [NOT SATISFIED] FDOT APPROVAL WILL BE NEEDED BEFORE
 ENGINEERING PERMIT. PREVIOUS COMMENT: S. DIXIE HWY IS
 MAINTAINED BY FDOT. FDOT'S APPROVAL FOR WORK WITHIN THE
 RIGHT OF WAY WILL BE NEEDED.
  
 17. [NEW COMMENT] STOP SIGNS AND STOP BARS WILL BE
 NEEDED AT THE DRIVEWAY ENTRANCES.[CAN BE PROVIDED WITH
 ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL]
  
 18. [NEW COMMENT] SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED PARKING
 ALONG S. DIXIE HWY. THE RESTRICTIVE PARKING SIGNS WILL
 NEED TO BE RELOCATED.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]

Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-11-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 01-11-2021 Time 10:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-01-11 14:47:35THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE A CONTINUATION FROM THE
 INITIAL REVIEW AND AFTER THE REVIEW OF THE 12/30/2020
 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. NO WRITTEN RESPONSES WERE PROVIDED
 FOR THE INITIAL STORMWATER REVIEW COMMENTS.
  
 THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. THE ENGINEERING AND LANDSCAPE PLANS DO NOT MATCH THE
 SITE PLAN. [NOT SATISFIED]
  
 2. ADD FLOW ARROWS TO THE ENGINEERING PLAN TO SHOW
 SURFACE WATER RUNOFF DIRECTION. [SATISFIED]
  
 3. AVOID PUTTING UTILITIES UNDER LANDSCAPE ISLANDS.
 [NOT SATISFIED]
  
 4. CONSIDER CREATING 2 FOOT OVERHANGS INTO LANDSCAPE
 AREAS FOR PARKING SPACES. [SATISFIED - TWO-FOOT
 OVERHANG SHOWN ON SITE PLAN BUT PAVED AREA OF PARKING
 SPACES ARE DIMENSIONED AS 18' LONG.
  
 5. CATCH BASIN GRATE ELEVATIONS APPEAR TO BE HIGHER
 THAN SOME ADJACENT PARKING LOT GRADES.[SATISFIED]
  
 6. THE TRAVEL LANE SPACE BETWEEN THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS
 ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN APPEARS TOO NARROW FOR TWO WAY
 TRAFFIC.[SATISFIED]
  
 7. PROVIDE BOTTOM ELEVATION OF EXISTING ONSITE DRAINAGE
 STRUCTURES THAT ARE TO REMAIN.[SATISFIED - ALL EXISTING
 STRUCTURES ARE BEING REMOVED]
  
 8. CURBING NEEDED FOR NARROW PARKING AREAS NORTH OF THE
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS.[SATISFIED - CURBING SHOWN ON THE
 ENGINEERING PLAN]
  
 9. SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.[NOT SATISFIED]
  
 10. SCALES SHOULD MATCH FOR SURVEY, ENGINEERING PLANS
 AND LANDSCAPE PLANS.[NOT SATISFIED]
  
 NEW COMMENTS
 11. SHEET A001 PROPOSED SITE PLAN
 A. UPDATE THE FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION (SEE THE BOUNDARY
 SURVEY).
 B. A STANDARD PARKING SPACE IS 8.5' X 18'.
 B.1. THE STRIPING FOR PARKING SPACES FACING S. DIXIE
 HWY, THE TWO SPACES FACING VALENCIA ROAD AND THE FOUR
 PARKING SPACINGS BEHIND THE BUILDING APPEAR TO BE
 LONGER THAN 18 FEET.
 B.2. THERE IS 2' PARKING OVERLAP WITH LANDSCAPING
 CALLED OUT FOR THE TEN PARKING SPACES ALONG THE BACK OF
 THE PARKING LOT. THESE PARKING SPACES ARE SHOWN TO BE
 18 FEET LONG SO THE OVERLAP IS NOT REQUIRED.
 B.3. THE DRIVE AISLE IS DIMENSIONED TO BE 26' 6.5"
 WIDE. IT CAN BE NARROWED TO 24 FEET. CONSIDERING THIS
 NARROWING AND PROVIDING THE 2' PARKING OVERLAP CAN MOVE
 THE EAST EDGE OF THE PARKING LOT TO THE WEST BY MORE
 THAN 4.5 FEET.
 C. PROVIDE THE VERTICAL DATUM FOR THE FFE. IT SHOULD
 MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN.
 D. SHOW STOP BARS AND STOP SIGNS.
 E. SHOW PARALLEL PARKING SPACES (STRIPING) ALONG S.
 DIXIE HWY.
  
 12. SHEET C-1 SITE PAVING & DRAINAGE PLAN
 A. REPLACE THE DROP CURB WITH TYPE 'F' CURB AND GUTTER
 IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING ALONG S. DIXIE HWY.
 B. REPLACE THE SIDEWALK WITH 6" THICK SIDEWALK WHERE
 THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY IS BEING WIDENED.
 C. LABEL THE SLAB FOR THE BICYCLE RACK.
 D. LABEL THE LEFT PROPOSED WALKWAY IN FRONT OF THE
 BUILDING.
 E. CONNECT THE ROOF DRAIN(S) FOR THE PROPOSED BUILDING
 ADDITION TO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. (CAN BE SHOWN AT TIME
 OF ENGINEERING PERMIT).
  
 13. SHEET C-3 PGD NOTES AND DETAILS - INVERT ELEVATION
 OF PIPE SHOWN IN THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH DETAIL DOES
 NOT MATCH THE INVERT ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON SHEET C-1.
  
 14. SHEET EC-1 SWPPP - SHOW BMPS FOR OFFSITE DRAINAGE
 SYSTEMS.
  
 15. SHEET A002 PARKING STALL STRIPING DETAIL:
 A. WHEEL STOPS ARE GENERALLY 2 FEET FROM THE END OF
 PARKING STALL.
 B. GRADES SHOWN FOIR HANDICAPP PARKING SPACE WOULD
 RESULT IN A FLAT (NO SLOPE) PARKING AREA AND STORMWATER
 RUNOFF WOULD NOT DRAIN OFF. GRADES ARE SHOWN ON THE
 ENGINEERING PLAN.
  
 16. S. DIXIE HWY IS MAINTAINED BY FDOT. FDOT'S APPROVAL
 FOR WORK WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY WILL BE NEEDED.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]

Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-12-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 03-12-2020 Time 11:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 03-12-2020 Time 11:47 Sent To  
Notes
2020-03-12 11:47:30THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. THE ENGINEERING AND LANDSCAPE PLANS DO NOT MATCH THE
 SITE PLAN.
  
 2. ADD FLOW ARROWS TO THE ENGINEERING PLAN TO SHOW
 SURFACE WATER RUNOFF DIRECTION.
  
 3. AVOID PUTTING UTILITIES UNDER LANDSCAPE ISLANDS.
  
 4. CONSIDER CREATING 2 FOOT OVERHANGS INTO LANDSCAPE
 AREAS FOR PARKING SPACES.
  
 5. CATCH BASIN GRATE ELEVATIONS APPEAR TO BE HIGHER
 THAN SOME ADJACENT PARKING LOT GRADES.
  
 6. THE TRAVEL LANE SPACE BETWEEN THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS
 ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN APPEARS TO NARROW FOR TWO WAY
 TRAFFIC.
  
 7. PROVIDE BOTTOM ELEVATION OF EXISTING ONSITE DRAINAGE
 STRUCTURES THAT ARE TO REMAIN.
  
 8. CURBING NEEDED FOR NARROW PARKING AREAS NORTH OF THE
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS.
  
 9. SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 10. SCALES SHOULD MATCH FOR SURVEY, ENGINEERING PLANS
 AND LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
  
 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED
 WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP PRIOR TO STARTING
 CONSTRUCTION.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  

Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 04-27-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 04-27-2021 Time 07:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-04-27 07:38:24PASSED WITH CONDITIONS:
  
 1. UNITY OF TITLE PRIOR TO C.O.
 2. GRANT OF UTILITY EASEMENTS ALONG SOUTH AND WEST
 PROPERTY LINES AND ANY REQUIRED FOR METER PRIOR TO C.O.

Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 03-24-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 03-24-2021 Time 15:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-03-24 15:03:481. NO RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS COMMENTS.

Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-04-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 01-04-2021 Time 09:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-01-04 09:11:52NO RESPONSE TO SURVEY COMMENTS.

Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-10-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 03-10-2020 Time 13:01 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-03-10 13:11:321. BY VIRTUE OF STATE STATUTE 95.361, THE WEST PROPERTY
 LINE NEEDS TO BE REVISED TO THE EAST R/W LINE PER RPB
 9, PG. 15.
 2. A UTILITY EASEMENT OVER THE SOUTH AND WEST 5' WILL
 NEED TO BE GRANTED TO THE CITY FOR THE EXISTING WATER
 MAIN.
  
  

Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 5 Status P Date 05-03-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 05-03-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-03 10:17:20NO FURTHER COMMENTS.
  
 PASSED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS TO BE FULFILLED
 PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY:
  
 1) UPDATE TRAFFIC STUDY SHOWCASING DRIVEWAY VOLUMES ON
 DIXIE HIGHWAY
 2) ANALYZE THE FOLLOWING INTERSECTIONS, UNDER THE S
 DIXIE LANE ELIMINATION PROJECT SCENARIO:
 2A. S DIXIE AND BELVEDERE
 2B. S DIXIE AND VALENCIA
  
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  

Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 04-29-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 04-29-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-04-29 17:01:45TRAFFIC STUDY
 1. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
 2. NOT SATISFIED. DRIVEWAY VOLUMES ARE ONLY SHOWN ALONG
 VALENCIA RD, NONE ALONG S DIXIE HWY. REVISE THE STUDY
 ACCORDINGLY
 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE FDOT APPROVAL LETTER FOR THE CURB
 CUT RELOCATION ON DIXIE
 4. WAVED. ANALYZE THE FOLLOWING INTERSECTIONS, UNDER
 THE S DIXIE LANE ELIMINATION PROJECT SCENARIO:
 4A. S DIXIE AND BELVEDERE
 4B. S DIXIE AND VALENCIA
  
 SITE PLAN
 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW IN THE SITE PLAN THE ROAD
 FEATURES AND CURB CUTS ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ALONG VALENCIA RD AND S DIXIE HWY
 6. SATISFIED. MARK THE DELIVERIES AREA AS LOADING ZONE
 7. SATISFIED. PROVIDE FDOT AND/OR COUNTY APPROVAL FOR
 THE ACCESS POINT RELOCATION ON S DIXIE HWY
 8. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ACCESS POINT ON VALENCIA ROAD
 SHALL BE RELOCATED FURTHER EAST:
 8A. SATISFIED. CITY CODE SEC. 94-312 2(A) REQUIRES 50
 FEET CORNER CLEARANCE DISTANCE ON A NON-THOROUGHFARE.
 CURRENTLY 40 FEET.
 8B. SATISFIED. THE DRIVEWAY TRAVEL PATH IS ENCROACHING
 THE WEST SIDE PARKING STALLS
 8C. NOT SATISFIED. THE DRIVEWAY TRAVEL PATH IS
 ENCROACHING THE EAST SIDE PARKING STALLS. DRIVEWAY
 CENTER
 9. SATISFIED. DEVELOPER SHALL COORDINATE WITH PALM TRAN
 PERTAINING THE NEARBY BUS STOP AND CONSTRUCT A BUS
 SHELTER AT LOCATIONS NOT IN CONFLICT WITH THE S DIXIE
 HIGHWAY FUTURE SHARED USED PATH. ALSO, CONSIDER
 RELOCATING THE BUS STOP TO NEAR THE MAIN ENTRANCE WITH
 COORDINATION WITH PALM TRAN.
 10. SATISFIED. CHECK FOR SIDEWALK CONDITIONS PER ADA
 COMPLIANCE
 11. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN PATHS FOR GARBAGE
 TRUCK AND SERVICE VEHICLES. SHOWCASE VEHICLES
 MANEUVERING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPERTY. PLEASE PROVIDE
 AUTOTURN ANALYSIS AS A SEPARATE DRAWING AND SHOWCASE
 VEHICLES' DYNAMIC ENVELOPE. PROVIDE DESIGN VEHICLES'
 DIMENSIONS.
 12. NOT SATISFIED. SHOWCASE DIXIE DRIVEWAYS APRON.
 13. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE ON-STREET PARKING STRIPING
 AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  

Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 03-25-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 03-25-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-03-25 09:31:52TRAFFIC STUDY
 1. DRIVEWAY VOLUMES ARE ONLY SHOWN ALONG VALENCIA RD,
 NONE ALONG S DIXIE HWY.
 1A. REVISE THE STUDY ACCORDINGLY
 1B. PROVIDE FDOT APPROVAL LETTER FOR THE CURB CUT
 RELOCATION
 2. ANALYZE THE FOLLOWING INTERSECTIONS, UNDER THE S
 DIXIE LANE ELIMINATION PROJECT SCENARIO:
 2A. S DIXIE AND BELVEDERE
 2B. S DIXIE AND VALENCIA
  
 SITE PLAN
 3. PLEASE SHOW IN THE SITE PLAN THE ROAD FEATURES AND
 CURB CUTS ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT ALONG VALENCIA RD AND S DIXIE HWY
 4. MARK THE DELIVERIES AREA AS LOADING ZONE
 5. PROVIDE FDOT AND/OR COUNTY APPROVAL FOR THE ACCESS
 POINT RELOCATION ON S DIXIE HWY
 6. ACCESS POINT ON VALENCIA ROAD SHALL BE RELOCATED
 FURTHER EAST:
 6A. CITY CODE SEC. 94-312 2(A) REQUIRES 50 FEET CORNER
 CLEARANCE DISTANCE ON A NON-THOROUGHFARE. CURRENTLY 40
 FEET.
 6B. THE DRIVEWAY TRAVEL PATH IS ENCROACHING THE WEST
 SIDE PARKING STALLS
 7. DEVELOPER SHALL COORDINATE WITH PALM TRAN PERTAINING
 THE NEARBY BUS STOP AND CONSTRUCT A BUS SHELTER AT
 LOCATIONS NOT IN CONFLICT WITH THE S DIXIE HIGHWAY
 FUTURE SHARED USED PATH. ALSO, CONSIDER RELOCATING THE
 BUS STOP TO NEAR THE MAIN ENTRANCE WITH COORDINATION
 WITH PALM TRAN.
 8. CHECK FOR SIDEWALK CONDITIONS PER ADA COMPLIANCE
 9. PROVIDE AUTOTURN PATHS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND SERVICE
 VEHICLES. SHOWCASE VEHICLES MANEUVERING IN AND OUT OF
 THE PROPERTY.
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  

Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 02-05-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 02-05-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-02-05 16:53:13TRAFFIC STUDY
 1. DRIVEWAY VOLUMES ARE ONLY SHOWN ALONG VALENCIA RD,
 NONE ALONG S DIXIE HWY.
 1A. ARE YOU ABANDONING THE DRIVEWAYS ON S DIXIE HWY?
 1B. IF NOT, PLEASE PROVIDE FDOT APPROVAL LETTER AND
 REVISE THE TRAFFIC STUDY ACCORDINGLY
 2. ANALYZE THE FOLLOWING INTERSECTIONS, UNDER THE S
 DIXIE LANE ELIMINATION PROJECT SCENARIO:
 2A. S DIXIE AND BELVEDERE
 2B. S DIXIE AND VALENCIA
  
 SITE PLAN
 3. PLEASE SHOW CURB AND CURB CUTS ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE
 OF THE PROPERTY ALONG VALENCIA RD AND S DIXIE HWY
 4. NEED TO DESIGNATE AND PROVIDE DIMENSIONS OF THE
 LOADING ZONE
 5. PROVIDE VEHICLE AND BICYCLE PARKING INFORMATION IN
 THE ZONING & SITE CALCULATIONS TABLE
 6. PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING
 7. REMOVE PARKING ON THE SOUTH-WEST SIDE OF THE
 PROPERTY. NOT ENOUGH SPACE FOR VEHICLES TO
 MANEUVER/TURNAROUND
 8. PARKING ISLANDS (BOTH INTERIOR AND TERMINAL) DO NOT
 MEET THE 8? MINIMUM REQUIREMENT PER ARTICLE XIV SEC.
 94-443 (C) (3) A-B
 9. PLEASE CLARIFY CIRCULATION AND MANEUVERING IN THE
 SOUTH EAST PORTION OF THE PROPERTY, MARKED AS ?NEW
 ASPHALT PAVEMENT?
 10. THE DEVELOPER SHALL COORDINATE WITH FDOT AND CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH ON THE DIXIE HIGHWAY LANE
 ELIMINATION PROJECT ALONG THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE UNTIL
 THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE LANE ELIMINATION PROJECT IS
 COMPLETED.
 11. ACCESS POINTS DEPICTED ON S DIXIE HWY
 11A. CITY CODE SEC. 94-312 1(A) ONLY ALLOWS ONE ACCESS
 POINT PER STREET. CURRENTLY TWO.
 11B. CITY CODE SEC. 94-312 2(A) REQUIRES 245 FEET
 DISTANCE BETWEEN DRIVEWAYS ON A MINOR ARTERIAL.
 CURRENTLY 60 FEET DISTANCE.
 12. ACCESS POINT ON VALENCIA ROAD
 12A. CITY CODE SEC. 94-312 2(A) REQUIRES 50 FEET CORNER
 CLEARANCE DISTANCE ON A NON-THOROUGHFARE. CURRENTLY 40
 FEET.
 13. PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN PATH FROM VALENCIA RD TO THE
 PROPOSED BUILDING WALKWAY THROUGH THE SITE
 14. DEVELOPER SHALL COORDINATE WITH PALM TRAN
 PERTAINING THE NEARBY BUS STOP AND CONSTRUCT A BUS
 SHELTER AT LOCATIONS NOT IN CONFLICT WITH THE S DIXIE
 HIGHWAY FUTURE SHARED USED PATH. ALSO, CONSIDER
 RELOCATING THE BUS STOP TO NEAR THE MAIN ENTRANCE WITH
 COORDINATION WITH PALM TRAN.
 15. CHECK FOR SIDEWALK CONDITIONS PER ADA COMPLIANCE
 16. PROVIDE AUTOTURN PATHS FOR GARBAGE, TRUCKS AND
 SERVICE VEHICLES
 17. PROVIDE SITE PHOTOMETRIC ANALYSIS
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  

Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 03-11-2020 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-03-11 09:44:56TRAFFIC STUDY
 1. DRIVEWAY VOLUMES ARE ONLY SHOWN ALONG VALENCIA RD,
 NONE ALONG S DIXIE HWY.
 A. ARE YOU ABANDONING THE DRIVEWAYS ON S DIXIE HWY?
 B. IF NOT, PLEASE PROVIDE FDOT APPROVAL LETTER AND
 REVISE THE TRAFFIC STUDY ACCORDINGLY
  
 2. ANALYZE THE FOLLOWING INTERSECTIONS, UNDER THE S
 DIXIE LANE ELIMINATION PROJECT SCENARIO:
 A. S DIXIE AND BELVEDERE
 B. S DIXIE AND VALENCIA
  
 SITE PLAN
  
 3. PLEASE SHOW CURB AND CURB CUTS ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE
 OF THE PROPERTY ALONG VALENCIA RD AND S DIXIE HWY
  
 4. NEED TO DESIGNATE AND PROVIDE DIMENSIONS OF THE
 LOADING ZONE
  
 5. PROVIDE VEHICLE AND BICYCLE PARKING INFORMATION IN
 THE ZONING & SITE CALCULATIONS TABLE
  
 6. PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING
  
 7. REMOVE PARKING ON THE SOUTH-WEST SIDE OF THE
 PROPERTY. NOT ENOUGH SPACE FOR VEHICLES TO
 MANEUVER/TURNAROUND
  
 8. PARKING ISLANDS (BOTH INTERIOR AND TERMINAL) DO NOT
 MEET THE 8' MINIMUM REQUIREMENT PER ARTICLE XIV SEC.
 94-443 (C) (3) A-B
  
 9. PLEASE CLARIFY CIRCULATION AND MANEUVERING IN THE
 SOUTH EAST PORTION OF THE PROPERTY, MARKED AS "NEW
 ASPHALT PAVEMENT"
  
 10. THE DEVELOPER SHALL COORDINATE WITH FDOT AND CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH ON THE DIXIE HIGHWAY LANE
 ELIMINATION PROJECT ALONG THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE UNTIL
 THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE LANE ELIMINATION PROJECT IS
 COMPLETED.
  
 11. ACCESS POINTS DEPICTED ON S DIXIE HWY
 A. CITY CODE SEC. 94-312 1(A) ONLY ALLOWS ONE ACCESS
 POINT PER STREET. CURRENTLY TWO.
 B. CITY CODE SEC. 94-312 2(A) REQUIRES 245 FEET
 DISTANCE BETWEEN DRIVEWAYS ON A MINOR ARTERIAL.
 CURRENTLY 60 FEET DISTANCE.
  
 12. ACCESS POINT ON VALENCIA ROAD
 A. CITY CODE SEC. 94-312 2(A) REQUIRES 50 FEET CORNER
 CLEARANCE DISTANCE ON A NON-THOROUGHFARE. CURRENTLY 40
 FEET.
  
 13. PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN PATH FROM VALENCIA RD TO THE
 PROPOSED BUILDING WALKWAY THROUGH THE SITE
  
 14. DEVELOPER SHALL COORDINATE WITH PALM TRAN
 PERTAINING THE NEARBY BUS STOP AND CONSTRUCT A BUS
 SHELTER AT LOCATIONS NOT IN CONFLICT WITH THE S DIXIE
 HIGHWAY FUTURE SHARED USED PATH. ALSO, CONSIDER
 RELOCATING THE BUS STOP TO NEAR THE MAIN ENTRANCE WITH
 COORDINATION WITH PALM TRAN.
  
 15. CHECK FOR SIDEWALK CONDITIONS PER ADA COMPLIANCE
  
 16. PROVIDE AUTOTURN PATHS FOR GARBAGE, TRUCKS AND
 SERVICE VEHICLES
  
 17. PROVIDE SITE PHOTOMETRIC ANALYSIS
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 [email protected]
 561-494-1092
  

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 05-04-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 05-04-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 05-04-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-05-19 10:42:33CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (OVERALL - UPDATED 5/19/2021):
  
 1.) A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT FOR THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE
 ACCESS POINT(S) ON SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY SHALL BE
 RECEIVED FROM THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
 (FDOT) PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR
 ANY EXTERIOR SITE WORK TO BE COMPLETED FOR THE PROJECT.
 A COPY OF THE REQUIRED FDOT PERMIT SHALL BE PROVIDED TO
 THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION
 UPON RECEIPT OF THE PERMIT.
  
 2.) HE BICYCLE RACKS SHALL BE ORIENTATED PARALLEL (NOT
 PERPENDICULAR AS PROVIDED IN THE PLANS) TO SOUTH DIXIE
 HIGHWAY, AS IT WOULD BE MORE FUNCTIONAL WITH THE DESIGN
 AND PLACEMENT OF THE BICYCLE RACK PAD ON SITE. THE
 DESIGN OF THE BICYCLE RACK PAD SHALL REMAIN CONSISTENT
 WITH THE CITY'S BICYCLE PARKING GUIDELINES. A SEPARATE
 BUILDING PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE INSTALLATION
 OF THE BICYCLE RACK(S) AND PAD.
  
 3.) RIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
 (C.O.) FOR THE PROJECT, THE APPLICANT SHALL COMPLETE
 THE FOLLOWING: A.) A UNITY OF TITLE APPLICATION SHALL
 BE FILED WITH THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT, AND
 A COPY OF THE RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE DOCUMENT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED AND FILED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION. B.) GRANT OF UTILITY
 EASEMENTS ALONG THE SOUTH AND WEST PROPERTY LINES AND
 ANY REQUIRED FOR METER. C.) UPDATE TRAFFIC STUDY
 SHOWCASING DRIVEWAY VOLUMES ON DIXIE HIGHWAY. D.)
 ANALYZE THE FOLLOWING INTERSECTIONS, UNDER THE SOUTH
 DIXIE LANE ELIMINATION PROJECT SCENARIO: I) SOUTH DIXIE
 HIGHWAY AND BELVEDERE ROAD II) SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY AND
 VALENCIA ROAD
  
 4.) PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION.
  
  
 *********
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
2021-05-04 08:52:13PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE SITE PLAN AND SITE
 PLAN DETAIL SHEETS FOR FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL WITH
 ZONING:
  
 1.) THE PARKING STALL STRIPING DETAIL AND SITE PLAN
 SHOWS THE PARKING STALLS ENCROACHING INTO THE DRIVE
 AISLE. PLEASE CORRECT.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR ZONING:
  
 1.) A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT FOR THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE
 ACCESS POINT(S) ON SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY SHALL BE
 RECEIVED FROM THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
 (FDOT) PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR
 ANY EXTERIOR SITE WORK TO BE COMPLETED FOR THE PROJECT.
 A COPY OF THE REQUIRED FDOT PERMIT SHALL BE PROVIDED TO
 THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION
 UPON RECEIPT OF THE PERMIT.
  
 2.) THE BICYCLE RACKS SHALL BE ORIENTATED PARALLEL (NOT
 PERPENDICULAR AS PROVIDED IN THE PLANS) TO SOUTH DIXIE
 HIGHWAY, AS IT WOULD BE MORE FUNCTIONAL WITH THE DESIGN
 AND PLACEMENT OF THE BICYCLE RACK PAD ON SITE. THE
 DESIGN OF THE BICYCLE RACK PAD SHALL REMAIN CONSISTENT
 WITH THE CITY'S BICYCLE PARKING GUIDELINES. A SEPARATE
 BUILDING PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE INSTALLATION
 OF THE BICYCLE RACK AND PAD.
  
  
  

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 03-24-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 03-24-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 03-24-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-03-24 13:19:50GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) THE SITE PLAN SHOWS MODIFICATIONS TO THE EXISTING
 CURB CUT(S) TO THE PROPERTY FROM SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY. A
 PREDETERMINATION LETTER FROM THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
 TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) APPROVING THE PROPOSED
 MODIFICATIONS TO THE CURB CUT(S) IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO
 THE ISSUANCE OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL. [1/5/2021 REPEAT
 COMMENT: AN EXAMPLE OF FDOTS PREDETERMINATION LETTER
 WAS PROVIDED TO ROBERT DUMMICH, ARCHITECT, ON 3/24/21]
  
  
 SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
  
 1.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING OUTSTANDING COMMENTS
 TO THE ZONING & SITE CALCULATIONS TABULAR FROM
 1/5/2021: A) THE PROVIDED BUILDING HEIGHT IS INCORRECT
 AND MUST BE CORRECTED FOR CONSISTENCY (THE OVERALL
 BUILDING HEIGHT IS CLEARLY NOT 29.5 FT.). ALSO NOTE
 THAT THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING IS MEASURED TO THE TOP
 OF THE PARAPET (NOT THE ROOF LINE AS PROVIDED IN THE
 ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS). B) CHECK PARKING
 CALCULATIONS. THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED FOR
 THE PROJECT DOES NOT ADD UP TO 24.
  
 2.) A TWO-WAY DRIVE SHALL NOT BE GREATER THAN 20 FT.
 WIDE AT THE PROPERTY LINE. [1/5/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: A
 24 FT. WIDE CURB CUT WIDTH AT THE PROPERTY LINE IS NOT
 PERMITTED IN THE CITY.]
  
 3.) THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSE TO SITE PLAN COMMENT #10
 (1/5/2021), STATES THAT THE EXISTING FREESTANDING SIGN
 WILL BE RELOCATED. THE SITE PLAN MUST SHOW THE EXACT
 LOCATION OF THE SIGN RELOCATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY
 RELOCATION OF SIGNAGE WILL REQUIRE THE SIGN TO COME
 INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE SIGN REGULATIONS OF THE ZLDRS,
 INCLUDING SETBACKS, SIGN STRUCTURE HEIGHT AND SIGN
 AREA. ALSO, PLEASE INCLUDE A SIGN DETAIL SHOWING THE
 SIGN STRUCTURE HEIGHT AND GENERAL SIGN AREA. [1/5/2021
 MODIFIED COMMENT]
  
 4.) TO CLARIFY STAFF'S SITE PLAN COMMENTS #13 AND #14,
 CONSISTENCY IN THE PLANS IS REQUIRED (I.E. IF WHEEL
 STOPS ARE TO BE PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN, THEN THE
 DETAIL MUST SHOW WHEEL STOPS; IF A 2 FT. CURB OVERHANG
 IS PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN, THEN IT MUST BE DEPICTED
 AS SUCH IN THE DETAIL). AFTER SPEAKING TO RCARANCI
 (LANDSCAPING) IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT A 2 FT. CURB
 OVERHANG SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN LIEU OF WHEEL STOPS IN
 ORDER TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE AREA TO THE SITE.
 PLEASE WORK WITH ZONING AND LANDSCAPING TO MAKE SURE
 THIS COMMENT IS CONSISTENTLY ADDRESSED. [1/5/2021
 MODIFIED SITE PLAN COMMENTS #13 AND #14]
  
 5.) ALL NEW LIGHT POLE FIXTURES MUST BE SETBACK A
 MINIMUM OF 15 FT. FROM A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT.
 THERE IS ONE LIGHT POLE FIXTURE ALONG THE NORTH
 PROPERTY LINE THAT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THIS SETBACK
 REQUIREMENT. [1/5/2021 REPEAT COMMENT]
  
 6.) THE LOCATION OF THE BICYCLE RACKS SHALL BE
 CONSISTENT WITH THE STANDARDS FOR RACK PLACEMENT PER
 ZLDR S.94-485(Q). [1/5/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: THE
 PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE BICYCLE RACKS DOES NOT MEET
 THE MINIMUM STANDARDS.]
  
 7.) THE PROPOSED BACKUP/TURNAROUND SPACE SHALL BE
 HATCHED TO ILLUSTRATE THAT IT NOT A PARKING SPACE FOR
 CUSTOMERS.
  
 8.) TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ARE REQUIRED AT THE END
 OF EACH ROW OF PARKING. PLEASE WORK WITH RAY CARANCI,
 SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER, TO SATISFY THIS REQUIREMENT.
  
  
 ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS:
  
 1.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING AS IT RELATES TO THE
 CALCULATIONS AND INFORMATION PROVIDED FOR THE ALLOWANCE
 OF THE PROPOSED BAR FACILITY: A) THE SERVICE AREA
 SQUARE FOOTAGE ON SHEETS A001 AND A102 DO NOT MATCH.
 PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. B) CHECK THE SEATING
 NUMBERS. THERE DOES NOT SEEM TO BE 160 SEATS PROVIDED
 AND AS NOTED IN THE FLOOR PLAN (SHEET A102). PLEASE
 ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
 2.) THE BUILDING HEIGHT TO THE TOP OF THE PARAPET SHALL
 BE PROVIDED (I.E. DIMENSION PROVIDED IN THE PLANS TO
 THE TOP OF THE ROOF LINE IS INSUFFICIENT).
  
  
 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN:
  
 1.) SETBACK DISTANCE TO THE PROPERTY LINE FOR ALL LIGHT
 POLE FIXTURES MUST ALSO BE INCLUDED IN THE PHOTOMETRIC
 PLAN. ALL LIGHT POLES MUST COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM
 SETBACKS AS PROVIDED IN THE ZLDRS. [1/5/2021 MODIFIED
 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN COMMENT #2]
  
 2.) THE FOLLOWING NOTE MUST ALSO BE PROVIDED IN THE
 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN: ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE
 SHIELDED TO REDUCE GLARE AND SHALL BE ARRANGED TO
 REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE AWAY FROM ALL ADJACENT
 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT RESIDENCES, OR PUBLIC
 THOROUGHFARES. [ZLDR S.94-309(2)] [1/5/2021 REPEAT
 COMMENT]
  
  
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:
  
 * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 * ANY CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE
 (3) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 11 INCHES X
 17 INCHES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND
 DOCUMENTS.
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE
 ($200.00).
  
 * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE
 QUESTIONS.

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-05-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 01-05-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 01-05-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-01-05 15:05:59GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) SERVICE LETTERS FROM AT&T, FPU, FPL AND COMCAST
 CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH
 INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE
 PROVISION OF THEIR SERVICES ARE REQUIRED. PLEASE REFER
 TO PAGE 7 OF THE 2021 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR
 CONTACT INFORMATION ON THE SERVICE PROVIDERS.
  
 2.) RESPONSES TO SEC. 94-35(C) OF THE ZONING AND LAND
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS) IS MISSING FROM THE
 APPLICATION FILE. PLEASE PROVIDE AS THIS IS A REQUIRED
 COMPONENT OF THE INFORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS
 (REFERENCE PAGE 26 OF THE 2021 DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION).
  
 3.) THE TPS APPROVAL LETTER ISSUED BY THE PALM BEACH
 COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS -
 TRAFFIC DIVISION (ISSUED ON 2/19/2020) SHALL BE UPDATED
 TO REFLECT THE CHANGES IN THE BUILDING SIZE (5,426 SQ.
 FT.) TO ELIMINATE ANY POSSIBILITY OF GHOST TRIPS
 GENERATED BY THE PROJECT.
  
 4.) THE SITE PLAN SHOWS MODIFICATIONS TO THE EXISTING
 CURB CUT(S) TO THE PROPERTY FROM SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY. A
 PREDETERMINATION LETTER FROM THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
 TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) APPROVING THE PROPOSED
 MODIFICATION TO THE CURB CUT(S) IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO
 THE ISSUANCE OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
  
  
  
 SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
  
 1.) THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE SITE PLAN IS NOT
 CONSISTENT WITH THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE SURVEY.
 [3/9/2020 REPEAT COMMENT: NOT ADDRESSED (SHEETS A000
 AND A001). ALTHOUGH THE RESPONSE LETTER TO STAFF'S
 COMMENTS (DATED 12/14/2020) STATES THAT THE LEGAL
 DESCRIPTION HAS BEEN REVISED, IT IS STILL INCORRECT IN
 THE RESUBMITTED PLANS.
  
 2.) LOT DIMENSIONS PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT
 MATCH THE LOT DIMENSIONS PROVIDED IN THE SURVEY. PLEASE
 ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY (I.E. SHEETS A000 AND A001).
  
 3.) PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE ZONING
 AND SITE CALCULATIONS TABULAR ON SHEET A001: A) THE
 PROVIDED LOT WIDTH IS 100.00' (PER THE SURVEY) AND NOT
 93'. B) THE PROVIDED SIDE SETBACK IS 5'-7" (NOT 5'). C)
 THE REQUIRED/ALLOWED REAR SETBACK (ABUTTING A
 RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT) IS 15.0' (NOT 5.0'). D)
 THE PROVIDED BUILDING HEIGHT IS THE PROPOSED BUILDING
 HEIGHT AS PROVIDED IN THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS (NOT
 NONE AS PROVIDED IN THE TABULAR).
  
 4.) A DESIGNATED BACKOUT/TURNAROUND SPACE SHALL BE
 REQUIRED FOR THE PARKING AREA LOCATED NORTH OF THE
 BUILDING.
  
 5.) THE LOCATION OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE SHALL BE
 LOCATED AT LEAST A MINIMUM OF 5 FT. AND 15 FT. FROM THE
 PROPERTY LINE WHEN ABUTTING A RESIDENTIAL ZONING
 DISTRICT. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS THAT THE ENCLOSURE IS
 ONLY SETBACK 4 FT. FROM THE PROPERTY LINE ON ONE SIDE.
 PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE ZLDRS. [ZLDR
 S.94-145(2)]
  
 6.) PLEASE CLARIFY IF THE "OPEN ENTRY GARDEN" IS A
 PEDESTRIAN SPACE. IF SO, IT WOULD BE NECESSARY TO
 PROVIDE A BUFFER (I.E. LANDSCAPE) TO PROTECT
 PEDESTRIANS FROM VEHICLES AS THERE IS AN EXISTING CURB
 CUT FROM SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY TO THE SPACE.
  
 7.) PLEASE CLEARLY ILLUSTRATE AND DELINEATE THE WIDTH
 OF THE PROPOSED CURB CUT(S) TO THE PROJECT, AND ANY
 PROPOSED NEW BUFFERS WITHIN THE PROJECT. IT IS
 IMPERATIVE TO PROVIDE SEPARATION BETWEEN PEDESTRIAN
 SPACES AND VEHICULAR CIRCULATION AREAS.
  
 8.) A TWO-WAY DRIVE SHALL NOT BE GREATER THAN 20 FT.
 WIDE AT THE PROPERTY LINE. PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS
 FOR ALL MODIFIED CURB CUTS TO DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENCY
 WITH THE ZLDRS. [ZLDR S.94-312(1)]
  
 9.) ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM
 VEHICULAR USE AREAS BY NON-MOUNTABLE CONCRETE CURBING.
 IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THE LANDSCAPE TERMINAL ISLAND
 LOCATED NEXT TO THE TWO-WAY DRIVE AISLE EXITING ONTO
 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY IS OF THE REQUIRED CURBING. PLEASE
 IDENTIFY IN THE PLANS FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE ZLDRS.
 [ZLDR S.94-443(C)]
  
 10.) THERE IS A FLOATING "SIGN" NOTATION IN THE PARKING
 AREA. PLEASE CLARIFY IN THE PLANS. IF THIS IS THE
 EXISTING SIGN AS DEPICTED IN THE SURVEY, THEN IT SHOULD
 BE ILLUSTRATED AND NOTED AS SUCH. IF A NEW SIGN IS
 PROPOSED WITHIN THE PROJECT, THEN ALL NEW INFORMATION
 ON THE SIGN (LOCATION IN THE SITE PLAN AND DETAILS OF
 THE PROPOSED SIGNAGE) SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 11.) THE TWO "STANDARD" PARKING SPACES LOCATED TOGETHER
 DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM DIMENSIONS FOR A STANDARD
 PARKING STALL (TOTAL OF 17 FT. WIDE). PLEASE ADDRESS IN
 THE SITE PLAN. [ZLDR S.94-485]
  
 12.) ALL H.C. PARKING SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED OUTSIDE OF
 THE 2 FT. VEHICULAR OVERHANG TO ENSURE THERE WILL BE NO
 CONFLICT.
  
 13.) THE PARKING STALL STRIPING DETAIL ON SHEET A002
 ILLUSTRATES THE USE OF WHEEL STOPS; HOWEVER, THIS IS
 NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE SITE PLAN (I.E. 2 FT. CURB
 OVERHANG). PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
 14.) THE 2 FT. CURB OVERHANG FOR VEHICLES SHALL BE
 NOTED IN ALL PARKING AREAS WHERE PROVIDED.
  
 15.) ELIMINATE THE DUPLICATION OF THE H.C. PARKING
 SYMBOL IN ONE OF THE PARKING STALLS.
  
 16.) CLEARLY ILLUSTRATE THE LOADING ZONE IN THE SITE
 PLAN TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THERE WILL BE NO CONFLICT WITH
 THE PARKING ADJACENT TO THE LOADING AREA. APPROPRIATE
 TRUCK MANEUVERING TO AND FROM THE LOADING ZONE IS ALSO
 REQUIRED. PER THE ZLDRS THE USE WOULD REQUIRE ONE (1)
 10 FT. X 25 FT. LOADING ZONE. [ZLDR S.94-485, TABLE
 XV-4]
  
 17.) NEW LIGHT POLES ARE DETECTED IN THE PHOTOMETRIC
 PLAN; HOWEVER, THE LIGHT POLES ARE NOT SHOWN IN THE
 SITE PLAN. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. ALSO NOTE
 THAT ALL NEW POLE FIXTURES MUST BE SETBACK A MINIMUM OF
 5 FT. AND A MINIMUM OF 15 FT. (WHEN ABUTTING A
 RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT) FROM THE PROPERTY LINES.
 SOME FIXTURES DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM SETBACK DISTANCE.
 [ZLDR S.94-145(2)]
  
 18.) BICYCLE PARKING CALCULATIONS HAVE NOT BEEN
 INCLUDED IN THE SITE DATA CALCULATIONS AS REQUESTED BY
 STAFF. [3/9/2020 REPEAT COMMENT: NOT ADDRESSED.]
  
 19.) PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING FOR THE PROJECT. THE
 LOCATION OF THE RACK SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE
 STANDARDS PROVIDED IN ZLDR SEC. 94-485(Q). [NOTE: THERE
 SEEMS TO BE A NOTE IN THE SITE PLAN INDICATING BICYCLE
 PARKING FOR TWO BICYCLES; HOWEVER, THE RACK MUST BE
 DEPICTED IN THE PLAN. ALSO, THE LOCATION IS
 INCONSISTENT WITH THE LOCATION STANDARDS FOR BICYCLE
 PARKING, PER THE CITY'S BICYCLE PARKING GUIDELINES.]
  
 20.) A DETAIL OF A BICYCLE RACK IS REQUIRED. THE RACK
 DETAIL MUST BE SITE SPECIFIC AND MUST ALSO BE
 CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S BICYCLE PARKING GUIDELINES.
  
 21.) THE FENCE ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE SHALL BE
 NOTED IN THE SITE PLAN. IT IS REQUIRED THAT THE
 EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE BE REPLACED WITH AN OPAQUE
 WALL/FENCE TO PROVIDE SCREENING AND PROTECTION FROM THE
 ABUTTING RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT/USE. A MINIMUM 6
 FT. HIGH WALL/FENCE IS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. [ZLDR
 S.94-443(A)]
  
  
  
 ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS:
  
 1.) A BAR FACILITY IS DEPICTED IN THE FLOOR PLAN ON
 SHEET A102. PLEASE NOTE THAT PER CHAPTER 6 OF THE
 CITY'S CODE OF ORDINANCES, ONLY RESTAURANTS HAVING
 2,500 SQUARE FEET OF SERVICE AREA AND EQUIPPED TO SERVE
 150 PERSONS FULL COURSE MEALS AT ONE TIME, AND DERIVING
 AT LEAST 51 PERCENT OF THEIR GROSS REVENUE FROM THE
 SALE OF FOOD AND NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES MAY BE EXEMPT
 FROM MEETING THE DISTANCE SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS OF
 SERVING LIQUOR FOR CONSUMPTION ON PREMISE ONLY. IF THIS
 CANNOT BE MET, THE BAR FACILITY MUST BE REMOVED.
 OTHERWISE, PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS THAT DEMONSTRATE
 THAT THE PROPOSED BUSINESS QUALIFIES FOR SUCH
 EXEMPTION. [CODE OF ORDINANCES SEC. 6-2]
  
  
  
 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN:
  
 1.) PLEASE IDENTIFY WHICH LIGHT POLE FIXTURES ARE
 EXISTING AND NEW TO THE PROJECT.
  
 2.) SHOW THE SETBACK DISTANCE FOR ALL NEW POLE FIXTURES
 TO THE PROPERTY LINE. PER ZLDR S.94-145, ALL NEW
 STRUCTURES SHALL BE SETBACK A MINIMUM OF 5 FT. AND 15
 FT. (WHEN ABUTTING A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT) FROM
 THE PROPERTY LINES. SOME LIGHT POLE FIXTURES DO NOT
 MEET THE MINIMUM SETBACK DISTANCE REQUIRED BY THE
 ZLDRS. [ZLDR S.94-145(2)]
  
 3.) PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING NOTE IN THE PLAN: ALL OUTDOOR
 LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE GLARE AND SHALL BE
 ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE AWAY FROM ALL
 ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT RESIDENCES, OR
 PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES. [ZLDR S.94-309(2)]
  
  
  
 LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS:
  
 1.) CHECK OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS ON SHEET L-3. THE
 OPEN SPACE PERCENTAGE CALCULATION (40%) IS INCORRECT
 (STAFF HAS CALCULATED 80%).
  
  
  
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:
  
 * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 * ANY CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE
 (3) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 11 INCHES X
 17 INCHES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND
 DOCUMENTS.
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE
 ($200.00).
  
 * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE
 QUESTIONS.

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-09-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 03-09-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rfalcone Date 03-09-2020 Time 11:50 Sent To  
Notes
2020-03-09 11:52:00PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 03/06/2020
 PROJECT NO.: Z20020009
 CASE NO.: ISPR 20-09
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE PROPERTY DEED.
 2. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE SITE PLAN IS NOT
 CONSISTANT WITH THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE SURVEY.
 PLEASE REVISE.
 3. REVISE THE SIZE OF THE DUMPSTER TO COMPLY WITH
 PUBLIC WORKS REGULATIONS. INPUT THE GRAPHIC ON PLAN
 SET.
 4. REMOVE THE SOUTHERN CURB CUT AND SMALL PARKING LOT
 ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY. PURSUANT, ZLDR SEC.
 94-312(1)(1), ONLY ONE ACCESS DRIVE PER RIGHT OF WAY.
 5. RELOCATE THE HANDICAP PARKING STALL AT A DIFFERENT
 LOCATION ON THE SITE.
 6. CONTACT D.O.T. FOR PERMISSION TO CLOSE THE SOUTHERN
 CURB CUT ALONG S. DIXIE HIGHWAY.
 7. CONTACT D.O.T. FOR PERMISSION TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL
 ON STREET PARKING ALONG S. DIXIE TO BE COUNTED TOWARDS
 TOTAL PARKING CALCULATIONS FOR PROPERTY.
 8. REMOVE THE FOURTH PARKING STALL IN THE REAR OF THE
 PROPERTY NEAR THE LOADING ZONE. THERE IS NOT ENOUGH
 CLEARANCE FOR THE CAR TO EXIT PARKING STALL.
 9. PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING ON SITE AND INCLUDE BICYCLE
 PARKING CALCULATION IN SITE CALCULATION TABLE. PURSUANT
 ZLDR SEC. 94-485(Q)(1), NUMBER OF SPACES REQUIRED. ONE
 BICYCLE PARKING SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EVERY 20
 AUTOMOBILE PARKING SPACES.
 10. PROVIDE THE MASONRY WALL HEIGHT AROUND THE PROPOSED
 HICKORY SMOKER OUTDOOR AREA.
 11. PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS AND SETBACKS OF THE CONCRETE
 SLAB ON THE SITE PLAN.
 12. CLARIFY IF THERE WILL BE A ROOF OVER THE HICKORY
 SMOKER AREA. BASED ON SHEET A200, IT APPEARS TO HAVE A
 ROOF LINE ABOVE THE SMOKER AREA.
 13. PROVIDE A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN TO SHOW SITE LIGHTING
 I.E. LOCATION, HEIGHT, AND INSENSITY OF OUTDOOR
 LIGHTING. PURSUANT ZLDR SEC. 94-309(A) EXTERIOR
 LIGHTING. ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO
 REDUCE GLARE AND SHALL BE ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT OR
 GLARE AWAY FROM ALL ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS,
 ADJACENT RESIDENCES, OR PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES.
 ILLUMINATION OF SIGNS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE XIII OF THIS CHAPTER.
 14. INDICATE IF THERE WILL BE ROOFTOP
 MATERIAL/EQUIPMENT ON THE STRUCTURE. IF SO, PROVIDE AN
 ILLUSTRATION WITHIN PLAN SET.
 15. PROVIDE THE TYPE OF EXISITING FENCE ON SITE PLAN
 (CHAIN LINKED, WOOD, MASONRY, ETC).
  
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X
 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 RACHEL FALCONE, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1442
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
  

  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved