Plan Review Details - Project Z20010034
Plan Review Stops For Project Z20010034
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 02-12-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 02-12-2020 Time 21:19 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 02-12-2020 Time 21:19 Sent To  
Notes
2020-02-12 21:19:50NO COMMENTS
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status P Date 03-17-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 03-17-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 03-17-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 02-12-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 02-12-2020 Time   Rev Time  
Received By rrossano Date 02-12-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-02-12 10:31:13Z20010034 - CITYPLACE BIKE LANE AMENDMENT, OKEE &
 ROSEMARY
  
 SHEET C3.01
 1. PLEASE PROVIDE ENLARGED DETAIL OF PROPOSED HYDRANT
 CONNECTION INCLUDING EASEMENT.
 2. PLEASE SHOW ANY EXISTING WATER/SEWER/STORM UTILITY
 EASEMENTS.
  
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS.
 RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 02-07-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 02-07-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 02-07-2020 Time 13:02 Sent To  
Notes
2020-02-07 13:03:34FIRE HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 06-16-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 06-16-2020 Time 08:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 06-16-2020 Time 08:55 Sent To  
Notes
2020-06-16 08:57:05FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: CITYPLACE VALET AND STREETSCAPE Z20010034
 JUNE 16, 2020
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. SHOW THE CHANGE IN SQUARE FOOTAGE OF
 LANDSCAPE AREA FOR THE AFFECTED AREA.
  
 2. SATISFIED. ROYAL PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION MUST BE
 RELOCATED, NOT DESTROYED PER SECTION 94-448(D)(3).
 IF MATCHING THE NEW VALET SECTION, ADDING ROYAL PALMS
 ALONG THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK TO MAKE TWO ROWS IS
 SUGGESTED.
 IF THEY CANNOT BE RELOCATED WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT, THE
 CITY HAS LOCATIONS ON PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD TO
 REPLACE MISSING PALMS.
 THE 6 ROYAL PALMS CAN BE USED IN THE NEW DESIGN. THE
 PROPOSED LIGHT POLES CAN BE REPOSITIONED, AND MORE
 PALMS CAN BE ADDED BETWEEN POLES. STAFF DOES NOT
 SUPPORT THE REDUCTION IN SHADE FOR THE SIDEWALK. IF THE
 TWO ROWS OF ROYAL PALMS CANNOT BE PLACED TO CREATE
 SHADE, SHADE TREES AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 94-113 WILL
 BE REQUIRED AT MAXIMUM 30 FOOT SPACING.
 CHANGE THE GRAPHIC ON SHEET L1.01 TO SHOW THE ROYAL
 PALMS #35- 40 AS RELOCATED, NOT REMOVED.
 3. SATISFIED. THE LOCATIONS OF HOLLIES PROPOSED SHOULD
 BE CHECKED FOR SIGHT LINES FOR TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIANS.
 THERE SHOULD BE CLEAR VIEWING BETWEEN 3 FEET AND 7 FEET
 ABOVE THE GROUND. THIS IS AN ISSUE IN OTHER AREAS
 ALREADY.
  
 4. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS
 REQUIRED TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES.
  
 5. SATISFIED. SHOW WHERE THE LOW, MEDIUM AND HIGH WATER
 USE ZONES ARE LOCATE FOR THE POINTS TAKEN IN THE
 FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT.
  
 6. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
 PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
 MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
 PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF DROUGHT TOLERANT AND
 NATIVE SPECIES ADDED BASED ON THE PROPOSED PLANT LIST.
 PROVIDE ONE PERCENTAGE.
  
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 3/17/20:
 7. TRANSFERRED TO ZONING COMMENTS. SHOW FDOT SIGHTLINES
 CLEARLY AND LABEL THEM ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO
 SUBSTANTIATE ANY DESIGN CHANGE FROM THE PREVIOUSLY
 APPROVED STREETSCAPE SECTIONS ALREADY INSTALLED.
 THE SIGHTLINES ARE NOT LABELED AND THE LINE ON SHEET
 L2.02 DOES NOT SHOW AN ORIGINATION POINT. IF FROM
 ROSEMARY STOP BAR, THE REST OF THE SIGHTLINE NEEDS TO
 BE PROVIDED.
  
 8. SATISFIED. PENNISETUM SETACEUM ?ALBA? IS MISSING
 REFERENCE FOR NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT COLUMNS ON
 THE PLANT LIST.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENT 5/19/20:
 9. SATISFIED. SUBMITTED DESIGN FOR THE EASTERN AND
 WESTERN SECTIONS DOES NOT MEET THE STREETSCAPE CODE OR
 THE OVERALL INTENT OF THE LANDSCAPE CODE REGARDING TREE
 CANOPY. THE INTENT OF THE CODE IS TO PRESERVE OR EXPAND
 THE AMOUNT OF CANOPY INCLUDING FROM THE ROYAL PALMS, SO
 THE CANOPY COVERAGE MUST BE EQUAL OR GREATER THAN
 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED AND INSTALLED.
 ? WESTERN SECTION. SHEET L-100 SHOWS 11 PALMS EXISTING,
 5 ALONG THE SIDEWALK PROVIDING SHADE, AND 6 INTERIOR TO
 THE AREA. SHEET L-2.00 NEEDS TO SHOW AT LEAST 11 PALMS
 TOTAL INCLUDING AT LEAST 5 ALONG THE SIDEWALK. THE
 OVERALL CANOPY PROPOSED NEEDS TO BE EQUAL OR GREATER
 THAN THE EXISTING AND SHADE TREES MAY BE ADDED.
 ? CENTER SECTION. SHEET L-1.01 SHOWS 18 PALMS EXISTING,
 6 ALONG THE SIDEWALK PROVIDING SHADE, AND 12 INTERIOR
 TO THE AREA. SHEET L-2.01 SHOWS 17 PALMS AND 6 SHADE
 TREES TOTAL INCLUDING 9 PALMS ALONG THE SIDEWALK. THIS
 IS ACCEPTABLE, AS THE SHADE FOR THE SIDEWALK IS
 INCREASED, AND THE OVERALL CANOPY COVERAGE IS
 INCREASED.
 ? EASTERN SECTION. SHEET L-1.02 SHOWS 12 PALMS
 EXISTING, 5 ALONG THE SIDEWALK PROVIDING SHADE, AND 7
 INTERIOR TO THE AREA. SHEET L-2.02 NEEDS TO SHOW AT
 LEAST 12 PALMS TOTAL INCLUDING ONES ALONG THE
 RECONFIGURED SIDEWALK. THE OVERALL CANOPY PROPOSED
 NEEDS TO BE EQUAL OR GREATER THAN THE EXISTING AND
 SHADE TREES MAY BE ADDED.
  
 10. SATISFIED. LIGHT POLES AND PALMS CAN BE CLOSER THAN
 SHOWN. NOTE ON PLAN INDICATES 15 FOOT SPACING BETWEEN
 LIGHT POLES AND PALM TRUNKS, AND 15 FOOT DIAMETER IS
 SHOWN AROUND EACH LIGHT POLE, REPRESENTING A POSSIBLE
 7.5 FOOT SPACING BETWEEN LIGHT POLE AND PALM TRUNK.
 POLES AND PALMS CAN ALSO BE OFFSET SO LIGHTING IS NOT
 BLOCKED BY TRUNK OF PALM.
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 05-19-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 05-19-2020 Time 14:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 05-19-2020 Time 14:32 Sent To  
Notes
2020-05-19 14:34:14FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: CITYPLACE VALET AND STREETSCAPE Z20010034
 MAY 19, 2020
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. SHOW THE CHANGE IN SQUARE FOOTAGE OF
 LANDSCAPE AREA FOR THE AFFECTED AREA.
  
 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ROYAL PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION
 MUST BE RELOCATED, NOT DESTROYED PER SECTION
 94-448(D)(3).
 IF MATCHING THE NEW VALET SECTION, ADDING ROYAL PALMS
 ALONG THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK TO MAKE TWO ROWS IS
 SUGGESTED.
 IF THEY CANNOT BE RELOCATED WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT, THE
 CITY HAS LOCATIONS ON PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD TO
 REPLACE MISSING PALMS.
 THE 6 ROYAL PALMS CAN BE USED IN THE NEW DESIGN. THE
 PROPOSED LIGHT POLES CAN BE REPOSITIONED, AND MORE
 PALMS CAN BE ADDED BETWEEN POLES. STAFF DOES NOT
 SUPPORT THE REDUCTION IN SHADE FOR THE SIDEWALK. IF THE
 TWO ROWS OF ROYAL PALMS CANNOT BE PLACED TO CREATE
 SHADE, SHADE TREES AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 94-113 WILL
 BE REQUIRED AT MAXIMUM 30 FOOT SPACING.
 CHANGE THE GRAPHIC ON SHEET L1.01 TO SHOW THE ROYAL
 PALMS #35- 40 AS RELOCATED, NOT REMOVED.
 3. SATISFIED. THE LOCATIONS OF HOLLIES PROPOSED SHOULD
 BE CHECKED FOR SIGHT LINES FOR TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIANS.
 THERE SHOULD BE CLEAR VIEWING BETWEEN 3 FEET AND 7 FEET
 ABOVE THE GROUND. THIS IS AN ISSUE IN OTHER AREAS
 ALREADY.
  
 4. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS
 REQUIRED TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES.
  
 5. SATISFIED. SHOW WHERE THE LOW, MEDIUM AND HIGH WATER
 USE ZONES ARE LOCATE FOR THE POINTS TAKEN IN THE
 FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT.
  
 6. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
 PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
 MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
 PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF DROUGHT TOLERANT AND
 NATIVE SPECIES ADDED BASED ON THE PROPOSED PLANT LIST.
 PROVIDE ONE PERCENTAGE.
  
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 3/17/20:
 7. TRANSFERRED TO ZONING COMMENTS. SHOW FDOT SIGHTLINES
 CLEARLY AND LABEL THEM ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO
 SUBSTANTIATE ANY DESIGN CHANGE FROM THE PREVIOUSLY
 APPROVED STREETSCAPE SECTIONS ALREADY INSTALLED.
 THE SIGHTLINES ARE NOT LABELED AND THE LINE ON SHEET
 L2.02 DOES NOT SHOW AN ORIGINATION POINT. IF FROM
 ROSEMARY STOP BAR, THE REST OF THE SIGHTLINE NEEDS TO
 BE PROVIDED.
  
 8. SATISFIED. PENNISETUM SETACEUM ?ALBA? IS MISSING
 REFERENCE FOR NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT COLUMNS ON
 THE PLANT LIST.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENT 5/19/20:
  
 9. SUBMITTED DESIGN FOR THE EASTERN AND WESTERN
 SECTIONS DOES NOT MEET THE STREETSCAPE CODE OR THE
 OVERALL INTENT OF THE LANDSCAPE CODE REGARDING TREE
 CANOPY. THE INTENT OF THE CODE IS TO PRESERVE OR EXPAND
 THE AMOUNT OF CANOPY INCLUDING FROM THE ROYAL PALMS, SO
 THE CANOPY COVERAGE MUST BE EQUAL OR GREATER THAN
 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED AND INSTALLED.
 ? WESTERN SECTION. SHEET L-100 SHOWS 11 PALMS EXISTING,
 5 ALONG THE SIDEWALK PROVIDING SHADE, AND 6 INTERIOR TO
 THE AREA. SHEET L-2.00 NEEDS TO SHOW AT LEAST 11 PALMS
 TOTAL INCLUDING AT LEAST 5 ALONG THE SIDEWALK. THE
 OVERALL CANOPY PROPOSED NEEDS TO BE EQUAL OR GREATER
 THAN THE EXISTING AND SHADE TREES MAY BE ADDED.
 ? CENTER SECTION. SHEET L-1.01 SHOWS 18 PALMS EXISTING,
 6 ALONG THE SIDEWALK PROVIDING SHADE, AND 12 INTERIOR
 TO THE AREA. SHEET L-2.01 SHOWS 17 PALMS AND 6 SHADE
 TREES TOTAL INCLUDING 9 PALMS ALONG THE SIDEWALK. THIS
 IS ACCEPTABLE, AS THE SHADE FOR THE SIDEWALK IS
 INCREASED, AND THE OVERALL CANOPY COVERAGE IS
 INCREASED.
 ? EASTERN SECTION. SHEET L-1.02 SHOWS 12 PALMS
 EXISTING, 5 ALONG THE SIDEWALK PROVIDING SHADE, AND 7
 INTERIOR TO THE AREA. SHEET L-2.02 NEEDS TO SHOW AT
 LEAST 12 PALMS TOTAL INCLUDING ONES ALONG THE
 RECONFIGURED SIDEWALK. THE OVERALL CANOPY PROPOSED
 NEEDS TO BE EQUAL OR GREATER THAN THE EXISTING AND
 SHADE TREES MAY BE ADDED.
  
 10. LIGHT POLES AND PALMS CAN BE CLOSER THAN SHOWN.
 NOTE ON PLAN INDICATES 15 FOOT SPACING BETWEEN LIGHT
 POLES AND PALM TRUNKS, AND 15 FOOT DIAMETER IS SHOWN
 AROUND EACH LIGHT POLE, REPRESENTING A POSSIBLE 7.5
 FOOT SPACING BETWEEN LIGHT POLE AND PALM TRUNK. POLES
 AND PALMS CAN ALSO BE OFFSET SO LIGHTING IS NOT BLOCKED
 BY TRUNK OF PALM.
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 04-14-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 04-14-2020 Time 09:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 04-14-2020 Time 09:51 Sent To  
Notes
2020-04-15 09:50:50FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: CITYPLACE VALET AND STREETSCAPE Z20010034
 MARCH 17, 2020
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. SHOW THE CHANGE IN SQUARE FOOTAGE OF
 LANDSCAPE AREA FOR THE AFFECTED AREA.
  
 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ROYAL PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION
 MUST BE RELOCATED, NOT DESTROYED PER SECTION
 94-448(D)(3).
 IF MATCHING THE NEW VALET SECTION, ADDING ROYAL PALMS
 ALONG THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK TO MAKE TWO ROWS IS
 SUGGESTED.
 IF THEY CANNOT BE RELOCATED WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT, THE
 CITY HAS LOCATIONS ON PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD TO
 REPLACE MISSING PALMS.
 THE 6 ROYAL PALMS CAN BE USED IN THE NEW DESIGN. THE
 PROPOSED LIGHT POLES CAN BE REPOSITIONED, AND MORE
 PALMS CAN BE ADDED BETWEEN POLES. STAFF DOES NOT
 SUPPORT THE REDUCTION IN SHADE FOR THE SIDEWALK. IF THE
 TWO ROWS OF ROYAL PALMS CANNOT BE PLACED TO CREATE
 SHADE, SHADE TREES AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 94-113 WILL
 BE REQUIRED AT MAXIMUM 30 FOOT SPACING.
  
 3. SATISFIED. THE LOCATIONS OF HOLLIES PROPOSED SHOULD
 BE CHECKED FOR SIGHT LINES FOR TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIANS.
 THERE SHOULD BE CLEAR VIEWING BETWEEN 3 FEET AND 7 FEET
 ABOVE THE GROUND. THIS IS AN ISSUE IN OTHER AREAS
 ALREADY.
  
 4. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS
 REQUIRED TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES.
  
 5. SATISFIED. SHOW WHERE THE LOW, MEDIUM AND HIGH WATER
 USE ZONES ARE LOCATE FOR THE POINTS TAKEN IN THE
 FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT.
  
 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF
 PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
 PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF DROUGHT TOLERANT AND
 NATIVE SPECIES ADDED BASED ON THE PROPOSED PLANT LIST.
 PROVIDE ONE PERCENTAGE.
  
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 3/17/20:
 7. SHOW FDOT SIGHTLINES CLEARLY AND LABEL THEM ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN TO SUBSTANTIATE ANY DESIGN CHANGE FROM
 THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED STREETSCAPE SECTIONS ALREADY
 INSTALLED.
  
 8. PENNISETUM SETACEUM ?ALBA? IS MISSING REFERENCE FOR
 NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT COLUMNS ON THE PLANT LIST.
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 02-10-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 02-10-2020 Time 14:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 02-10-2020 Time 14:05 Sent To  
Notes
2020-02-10 14:05:32FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: CITYPLACE VALET AND STREETSCAPE Z20010034
 FEBRUARY 10, 2020
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SHOW THE CHANGE IN SQUARE FOOTAGE OF LANDSCAPE AREA
 FOR THE AFFECTED AREA.
  
 2. ROYAL PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION MUST BE RELOCATED, NOT
 DESTROYED PER SECTION 94-448(D)(3).
 IF MATCHING THE NEW VALET SECTION, ADDING ROYAL PALMS
 ALONG THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK TO MAKE TWO ROWS IS
 SUGGESTED.
 IF THEY CANNOT BE RELOCATED WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT, THE
 CITY HAS LOCATIONS ON PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD TO
 REPLACE MISSING PALMS.
  
 3. THE LOCATIONS OF HOLLIES PROPOSED SHOULD BE CHECKED
 FOR SIGHT LINES FOR TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIANS. THERE
 SHOULD BE CLEAR VIEWING BETWEEN 3 FEET AND 7 FEET ABOVE
 THE GROUND. THIS IS AN ISSUE IN OTHER AREAS ALREADY.
  
 4. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS REQUIRED TO
 PROTECT UTILITY LINES.
  
 5. SHOW WHERE THE LOW, MEDIUM AND HIGH WATER USE ZONES
 ARE LOCATE FOR THE POINTS TAKEN IN THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT.
  
 6. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT
 SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL
 ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT
 SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF
 SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA
 WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA
 LANDSCAPES.
 PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF DROUGHT TOLERANT AND
 NATIVE SPECIES ADDED BASED ON THE PROPOSED PLANT LIST.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status P Date 03-24-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 03-24-2020 Time 15:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 03-24-2020 Time 15:23 Sent To  
Notes
2020-03-24 15:23:18THE FOLLOWING COMMENT IS FROM THE REVIEW OF THE MARCH
 4, 2020 REVIEW SUBMITTAL PACKAGE.
  
 1. THE CITY'S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM IS THE NATIONAL
 GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 (NGVD1929). THE CITY
 HAS ACCEPTED SURVEYS AND ENGINEERING PLANS USING THE
 NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD1988) AS
 LONG AS THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 IS SHOWN ON
 THE SURVEY/DRAWINGS. THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS ARE
 MISSING THE CONVERSION EQUATION.
  
 TRACY WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 [email protected]
 561-494-1120
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status P Date 02-10-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 02-10-2020 Time 17:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 02-10-2020 Time 17:41 Sent To  
Notes
2020-02-10 17:40:55THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. OKEECHOBEE BLVD. IS MAINTAINED BY FDOT. SITE PLAN
 APPROVAL WILL BE CONDITIONED ON OBTAINING AN APPROVAL
 LETTER FROM FDOT FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE RIGHT
 OF WAY AND ANY PROPOSED OFFSITE AREA DRAINING TO THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
 THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS
 CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT.
  
 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED
 WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP PERMIT MODIFICATION
 PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 03-18-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 03-18-2020 Time 11:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 02-10-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 02-10-2020 Time 11:31 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-02-10 11:37:551. NO SURVEY PROVIDED.
 2. PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED.
 QUESTIONS AS BEEN RAISED AS TO THE CITY OR FDOT.
 3. THESE IMPROVEMENTS SHOULD BE INCORPORATED INTO THE
 ROSEMARY/OKEECHOBEE MMOA WITH THE FDOT AND SUBSEQUENT
 DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT WITH RELATED.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status P Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 05-12-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-05-12 12:57:34PASSED WITH CONDITION.
  
 CONDITION:
 1. PROVIDE EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ACCESS ON THE BIKE/PED
 PATHS.
  
  
 SHING TSOI
 CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
 [email protected]
 (TUESDAYS TO THURSDAYS)
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 04-08-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-04-08 18:55:471. PLEASE REVIEW THE LOCATIONS OF ABOVE GROUND UTILITY,
 SIGNAL, PEDESTRIAN, OR LIGHT POLE LOCATIONS TO
 ELIMINATE CONFLICTS WITH THE PROPOSED BIKE LANE, AND
 REVISE IF NEEDED.
  
 CONDITIONS:
 1. PROVIDE EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ACCESS ON THE BIKE/PED
 PATHS AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING.
 2. SHOW THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF SAPODILLA AVENUE TO
 ILLUSTRATE CONNECTION TO THE BIKELANE WEST OF SAPODILLA
 AVENUE AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING.
  
  
 SHING TSOI
 CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
 561-494-1141
 [email protected]
 (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS)
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 02-12-2020 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-02-12 09:39:44SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
 1. CONVERT THE PAVEMENT MARKING IN THE WESTBOUND EXIT
 LANES FROM THE VALET AREA (SHEET C3.00) TO A RIGHT-TURN
 ONLY AND THROUGH LANE SINCE THERE IS ONLY ONE RECEIVING
 LANE IN THE PARKING LOT.
 2. PROVIDE TRUNCATED DOMES AT CROSSINGS ONLY ALONG THE
 PEDESTRIAN PATH BUT NOT ALONG THE BIKE PATH. ALSO
 PROVIDE BOLLARDS AT THE CROSSWALK ENTRANCES TO SEPARATE
 BETWEEN PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLES AND TO PREVENT
 VEHICLES FROM DRIVING ON THE PED/BIKE PATH ERRONEOUSLY.
 3. PROVIDE CENTERLINE PAVER BAND OR USE DIFFERENT
 PATTERNS IN THE CROSSWALKS TO SEPARATE BICYCLES AND
 PEDESTRIANS WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMIT. WIDEN THE
 CROSSWALKS SO THAT THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE INNER EDGES
 OF THE OUTSIDE CROSSWALK BANDS IS 10 FEET.
 4. RE-DESIGN THE CROSSWALK AND RAMP AT SAPODILLE AVENUE
 AND WIDEN THE PEDESTRIAN REFUGE ISLAND TO ALIGN WITH
 THE PED/BIKE PATH ON BOTH SIDES OF THE CROSSWALK.
 5. PROVIDE EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ACCESS ON THE BIKE/PED
 PATHS.
  
  
 SHING TSOI
 CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
 561-494-1141
 [email protected]
 (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS)
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 02-24-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 02-24-2021 Time 16:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 06-08-2020 Time 14:55 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 05-19-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 05-19-2020 Time 13:22 Rev Time 3.00
Received By eschneid Date 05-18-2020 Time 09:46 Sent To  
Notes
2020-05-19 13:23:03CASE NO. PB 950UUUUU 1ST RESUBMITTAL REVIEW
 OKEECHOBEE SIDEWALK
 700 S. ROSEMARY
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,
 [email protected]
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TWO
 (2) PAPER COPIES (MAY BE MAILED/FEDEX) AND AN
 ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE
 NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE
 SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS
 MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM
 THE DATE OF THE COMMENTS (BY JUNE 14, 2020), THE CASE
 SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL
 REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 ADDITIONAL RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF
 PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE
 SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED
 A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL
 APPLICATION FEE ($60).
  
 ENTIRE PROJECT LENGTH
  
 1) UPDATED COMMENT: STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE SIGHT LINE
 DRAWINGS PROVIDED WITH THE RESUBMITTAL AND NOTED THAT
 THE LOCATIONS FOR THE CARS USED TO DELINEATE THE SIGHT
 LINES ARE NOT 1) IN THE CORRECT LANE AT SAPODILLA; 2)
 USING THE CORRECT STREET DESIGN AT SAPODILLA; AND 3)
 SHOWN AT ALL ON THE SOUTH ROSEMARY SECTION. REGARDLESS
 OF THE PRECEDING STATEMENT, STAFF RECOGNIZES THAT
 MOVING CARS BACK TO THE STOP BAR LOCATIONS WILL
 CONTINUE TO HAVE THE SAME GENERAL SIGHT LINES THAT ARE
 SHOWN WITH THE CURRENT CONFIGURATION. THE RESPONSE
 STATES THAT THE DESIGN IS THE SAME AS THE KRAVIS CENTER
 WHERE THEY WERE UNABLE TO INSTALL ROYAL PALM TREES IN
 THE LANDSCAPE STRIP BETWEEN THE ROADWAY AND THE
 SIDEWALK DUE TO THE SIGHT LINE ISSUES. IN ORDER TO
 COMPLY WITH THE CITY'S ROADWAY LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS,
 THE KRAVIS CENTER INSTALLED CANOPY TREES ON THE NORTH
 SIDE OF THE SIDEWALK TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED SHADING.
 YOU HAVE TWO OPTIONS:
  
 A. INSTALL CANOPY TREES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE
 SIDEWALK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY?S LANDSCAPE
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 B. USE ROYAL PALM TREES TO PROVIDE SHADE. WHILE THE
 MOST APPROPRIATE LOCATION FOR ROYAL PALM TREES TO
 PROVIDE SHADE FOR THE OKEECHOBEE SIDEWALK IS ON BOTH
 SIDES OF THE SIDEWALK, DUE TO THE SIGHT LINE
 CONSTRAINTS, STAFF WILL ACCEPT ROYAL PALMS AS OUTLINED
 IN THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS.
  
 RUTH CHRIS SECTION - UPDATED COMMENTS
  
 2) THE TREE CANOPY ALONG THE SIDEWALK HAS BEEN REDUCED.
 PLEASE SEE THE LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMENTS FOR CORRECTIVE
 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE USE OF ROYAL PALMS.
  
 3) PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE BICYCLE RACK PAD ON
 SHEET L.3.00.
  
 VALET PARKING LOT SECTION - DESIGN APPROVED
  
 4) THE PROPOSED ROYAL PALM CONFIGURATION ON THE NORTH
 SIDE OF THE SIDEWALK, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PARKING
 LOT ROYAL PALM TREES MEETS THE SIDEWALK SHADE AND THE
 STAGGERED ROWS OF ROYAL PALM TREE AESTHETIC ALONG
 OKEECHOBEE.
  
 LUCID SECTION - UPDATED COMMENTS
  
 5) THE TREE CANOPY ALONG THE SIDEWALK HAS BEEN REDUCED.
 PLEASE SEE THE LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMENTS FOR CORRECTIVE
 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE USE OF ROYAL PALMS.
  
 6) THE USE OF ROYAL PALM TREES NEEDS TO INCLUDE TWO OR
 MORE ROWS OF ROYAL PALM TREES TO CONTINUE THE EXISTING
 DESIGN AESTHETIC. THE PROPOSED PLAN ONLY SHOWS ONE ROW
 OF ROYAL PALMS TREES. IF THE DOUBLE ROW OF ROYAL PALM
 TREES IS NOT ABLE TO BE INSTALLED IN THE PLANTING BED
 ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK (GRADE
 CONCERNS WERE MENTIONED IN AN EARLIER MEETING) ROYAL
 THEN ONE OPTION IS TO INSTALL ROYAL PALM TREES IN
 PLANTING BEDS IN THE PLAZA AREA (SIMILAR TO THE
 EXISTING CONDITIONS). ANOTHER OPTION IS TO INSTALL THE
 FIVE (5) FOOT WIDE BICYCLE PATH ALONG THE CURB
 (LOCATION OF EXISTING SIDEWALK) AND INSTALL A FIVE (5)
 FOOT WIDE PLANTING AREA FOR THE ROYAL PALMS BETWEEN THE
 BICYCLE PATH AND A NOW SIX (6) FOOT WIDE PEDESTRIAN
 SIDEWALK. NOTE: THE STREET SIGNS WOULD BE INSTALLED
 WITHIN THE PLANTING AREA.
  
 7) IN THE PRE-APPLICATION MEETINGS FOR THE USE OF THE
 SPACE AS A MOTOR VEHICLE SALES ESTABLISHMENT, IT WAS
 CONVEYED THAT THE PARKING OF MOTOR VEHICLES ON THE
 OUTDOOR PLAZA AREA IS NOT PERMITTED. SHEET L3.01
 INCLUDES A NOTE THAT STATES CARS WILL BE PARKED FOR
 DISPLAY IN THE PLAZA.
  
 8) ADDITIONALLY, IT WAS STATED THAT A BARRIER AT THE
 LIMITS OF THE ROOFED OUTDOOR AREA WOULD NEED TO REMAIN
 IN ORDER TO DELINEATE THE LIMITS OF THE SHOWROOM AREA.
 THE PLANS DO NOT SHOW A BARRIER. NOTE: THE EXISTING
 WALKWAY IS AT LEAST 10 FEET WIDE FOR ITS ENTIRE LENGTH.
 THE PLANS NEED TO SHOW THAT AT NO POINT IS THE
 PEDESTRIAN PATH LESS THAN 10 FEET IN WIDTH ON THE
 PATIO. THE PROPOSED PLANS SHOW IT AT 8.25 FEET AT THE
 NARROWEST POINT.
  
 APPROVAL CONDITIONS
  
 9) AMEND THE MMOA FOR OKEECHOBEE TO INCLUDE THE NEW
 WORK.
  
 10) CITYPLACE RETAIL WILL NEED TO SIGN A MAINTENANCE
 AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY FOR THE AREA COVERED BY THE
 MMOA.
  
 11) RECORD EASEMENTS FOR THE SIDEWALKS AND THE SIGNS.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 04-14-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 04-14-2020 Time 10:58 Rev Time 1.50
Received By eschneid Date 04-13-2020 Time 13:55 Sent To  
Notes
2020-04-14 11:09:26CASE NO. PB 950UUUUU 1ST RESUBMITTAL REVIEW
 OKEECHOBEE SIDEWALK
 700 S. ROSEMARY
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,
 [email protected]
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TWO
 (2) PAPER COPIES (MAY BE MAILED/FEDEX) AND AN
 ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE
 NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE
 SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS
 MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM
 THE DATE OF THE COMMENTS (BY JUNE 14, 2020), THE CASE
 SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL
 REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 ADDITIONAL RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF
 PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE
 SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED
 A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL
 APPLICATION FEE ($60).
  
 ENTIRE PROJECT LENGTH
  
 1) NEW COMMENT: THE OKEECHOBEE SIDEWALK DESIGN IN FRONT
 OF ROSEMARY SQUARE IS TO CONTINUE THE DESIGN THAT WAS
 ESTABLISHED WITH THE RECENTLY COMPLETED VALET DROP OFF
 PROJECT. THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL MIRRORED THIS DESIGN IN
 THE VALET PARKING LOT SECTION OF THE PLAN AND PROVIDED
 JUST THE ONE ROW OF ROYAL PALMS IN THE LUCID SECTION OF
 THE PLAN (STAFF COMMENT WAS TO ADD A SECOND ROW OF
 ROYAL PALMS AT THIS LOCATION). NOT LANDSCAPE PLAN WAS
 SUBMITTED FOR THE ORIGINAL PROPOSAL FOR THE RUTH CHRIS
 SECTION. THE CURRENT PLANS REMOVE THE ROYAL PALMS
 BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND THE STREET. THE RESPONSE
 LETTER STATES, "FDOT LIMITS OF CLEAR SIGHT REQUIREMENTS
 AND OWNER/TENANT PREFERENCES" PROHIBIT THE INSTALLATION
 OF THESE ROYAL PALM TREES.
  
 A. PROVIDE THE FDOT LIMITS OF CLEAR SIGHT FOR ROYAL
 PALM TREES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SO THAT STAFF CAN
 VERIFY WHERE FDOT WILL NOT PERMIT THE INSTALLATION OF
 ROYAL PALM TREES.
  
 B. THE USE OF THE SINGLE ROW OF ROYAL PALMS DOES NOT
 MEET THE CITY'S LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS NOR DOES IT
 PROVIDE FOR A UNIFORM STREETSCAPE ALONG THIS SECTION OF
 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD. THE OWNER/TENANT PREFERENCES
 STILL NEED TO MEET CITY REQUIREMENTS.
  
 2) NEW COMMENT: PROVIDE THE DETAILS OF THE LIGHT POLES
 (INCLUDING HEIGHT) SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THE
 REQUIRED SEPARATION REQUIRED BETWEEN THE PROPOSED TREES
 AND THE PROPOSED LIGHTS.
  
 3) UPDATED COMMENT: STAFF HAD NOTED, "SHEET L2.01 SHOWS
 A NEW LIGHT POLE BEING INSTALLED WITHIN FIVE FEET OF
 THE ONE ROYAL PALM SLATED TO REMAIN. WHY IS THE LIGHT
 POLE BEING INSTALLED SO CLOSE TO THE TREE"? THE
 RESPONSE WAS THAT THE ROYAL PALM NEAR THE PROPOSED
 LIGHT POLE IS GOING TO BE REMOVED. THE LIGHT POLES NEED
 TO BE DESIGNED AROUND THE TREES, NOT VICE VERSA.
  
 RUTH CHRIS SECTION
  
 4) NEW COMMENT: THE BICYCLE PATH/SIDEWALK IS NOW SHOWN
 JOGGING NORTH AT THE SAPODILLA INTERSECTION AND THUS
 THE PATH IS NO LONGER IN LINE WITH THE CROSSWALK OR THE
 PATH ON THE WEST SIDE OF SAPODILLA. WHILE STAFF
 REALIZES THAT THE KRAVIS MAST ARM INSTALLATION INCLUDED
 NEW POLES WITHIN THE EXISTING SIDEWALK, THE PROPOSED
 ROUTE FORCES USERS FAR FROM THE CROSSWALK AND THE
 BICYCLE PATH DIRECTS USERS DIRECTLY INTO THE EXISTING
 FIRE HYDRANT. THE PLANS SHOW THAT THERE ARE AT LEAST 10
 FEET BETWEEN THE SOUTHERN OF THE TWO METAL LIGHT POLES
 AND THE TRAFFIC POLE. THE BICYCLE PATH/SIDEWALK NEEDS
 TO BE DESIGNED SO THAT IT TRAVERSES BETWEEN THESE TWO
 POLES. NOTE: THE BICYCLE PATH/SIDEWALK NEEDS TO PROVIDE
 A MINIMALLY CURVILINEAR ROUTE, SO THE TRANSITION
 BETWEEN THE STRAIGHT PORTION OF THE BICYCLE
 PATH/SIDEWALK AND ITS TERMINUS AT THE INTERSECTION
 NEEDS TO START FURTHER EAST THAN CURRENTLY SHOWN. THIS
 WILL REQUIRE A RECONFIGURATION OF THE LANDSCAPE AREAS.
  
 5) UPDATED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR SHOWING A BICYCLE
 RACK ON THE PLAN; HOWEVER, THIS LOCATION IS NOT NEAR
 THE ENTRANCE TO RUTH CHRIS (OR THE CITYPLACE
 CONDOMINIUM). THE BICYCLE RACK NEEDS TO BE LOCATED OFF
 THE SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO THE WALKWAY ADJACENT TO THE
 VALET PARKING AREA. THIS BOTH BRINGS THE PARKING CLOSER
 THE ENTRANCES TO RUTH CHRIS AND THE CONDOMINIUMS AND
 ALLOWS SURVEILLANCE FROM BOTH ENTRIES AND THE VALET
 LOT.
  
 VALET PARKING LOT SECTION
  
 6) THE PARKING LOT STRIPING DETAIL ON SHEET C3.10 DOES
 NOT MEET CITY STANDARDS AND NEEDS TO BE REPLACED WITH
 ONE THAT DOES.
  
 LUCID SECTION
  
 7) THERE HAS BEEN DISCUSSION OF INCLUDING AN EXPANDED
 PATIO CANOPY DESIGN. IF THIS IS THE CASE IT NEEDS TO BE
 SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS MUST BE
 PROVIDED AS WELL.
  
 APPROVAL CONDITIONS
  
 8) AMEND THE MMOA FOR OKEECHOBEE TO INCLUDE THE NEW
 WORK.
  
 9) CITYPLACE RETAIL WILL NEED TO SIGN A MAINTENANCE
 AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY FOR THE AREA COVERED BY THE
 MMOA.
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 02-13-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 02-13-2020 Time 11:54 Rev Time 0.75
Received By eschneid Date 02-13-2020 Time 11:21 Sent To  
Notes
2020-02-13 11:57:00CASE NO. PB 950UUUUU
 OKEECHOBEE SIDEWALK
 700 S. ROSEMARY
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,
 [email protected]
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE
 (5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY APRIL 13, 2020),
 THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER
 ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($60).
  
 1) THE DEMOLITION PLAN FOR THE PARKING AREA IN FRONT OF
 THE REGIONAL NEEDS TO PROVIDE MORE CLARITY AS TO WHAT
 IS BEING REMOVED.
  
 2) SHEET L2.01 SHOWS A NEW LIGHT POLE BEING INSTALLED
 WITHIN FIVE FEET OF THE ONE ROYAL PALM SLATED TO
 REMAIN. WHY IS THE LIGHT POLE BEING INSTALLED SO CLOSE
 TO THE TREE?
  
 3) THE SECTION IN FRONT OF THE OLD MELLOW MUSHROOM
 SPACE NEEDS TO HAVE THE SAME MULTIPLE ROWS OF PALM
 TREES THAT ARE ON THE OTHER ROADWAY SECTIONS.
  
 4) NO LANDSCAPE PLAN WAS SUBMITTED FOR THE SECTION IN
 FRONT OF RUTH CHRIS.
  
 5) PLEASE CONSIDER INSTALLING A BICYCLE RACK NEAR THE
 ENTRANCE TO RUTH CHRIS.
  
 6) AMEND THE MMOA FOR OKEECHOBEE TO INCLUDE THE NEW
 WORK.
  
 7) CITYPLACE RETAIL WILL NEED TO SIGN A MAINTENANCE
 AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY FOR THE AREA COVERED BY THE
 MMOA.
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved