 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z20010011
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z20010011 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-12-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
02-12-2020 |
Time |
20:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
02-12-2020 |
Time |
20:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-12 20:15:06 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. FLOOD ZONE. ACCORDING TO THE ADOPTED FLOOD INSURANCE | | | RATE MAPS (FIRMS), THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS IN FLOOD | | | ZONE A, WITH AN UNDETERMINED (BY FEMA) BASE FLOOD | | | ELEVATION. FLOOD INSURANCE WILL BE REQUIRED AND THE | | | FREEBOARD REQUIREMENT FOR ELEVATION OF THE FIRST FLOOR | | | OF THE BUILDING AND ALL ASSOCIATED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT | | | (CHILLERS, GENERATORS ETC.) IS 24 INCHES ABOVE BASE | | | FLOOD ELEVATION. | | | | | | 3. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR | | | THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, | | | AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 4. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB?PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS,GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, | | | FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, | | | GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, | | | SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 5. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER | | | AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY, | | | INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE | | | CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION | | | THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY. | | | | | | 6. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT | | | WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL | | | HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT | | | CAROLINE PUELL, ADDRESSING COORDINATOR, AT (561) 805 | | | 6659, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-07-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
05-07-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
05-07-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-05-07 10:44:22 | PASSED WITH PROVISORY COMMENTS FROM FIELD CUSTOMER | | | SERVICE (SHEET 3 ? ENGINEERING PLAN) FOR ENGINEERING | | | SUBMITTAL: | | | | | | -BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY APPEARS TO BE LOCATED TOO FAR AWAY | | | FROM WATER METER ? REFER TO STANDARD DETAIL WS-11. | | | | | | -HARD TO LOCATE/DIFFERENTIATE PROPERTY LINE ? REQUEST | | | PROPERTY LINE LABELED. | | | | | | -NEED VERIFICATION THAT WATER SERVICE WILL NOT BE USED | | | FOR FIRE SPRINKLERS. | | | | | | -SIZE OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY NEED TO BE | | | ADDED TO LABEL. | | | | | | -WATER SERVICE CAN?T BE PVC. | | | | | | -IF THERE IS TREE PLANNED NEAR WATER SERVICE, PREFER 5? | | | AWAY FROM EACH OTHER WITH ROOT BARRIERS ADDED TO | | | PREVENT ROOTS BREAKING CUSTOMER?S PIPE DOWNSTREAM OF | | | METER. | | | | | | THANKS, | | | | | | MARK HURLEY | | | FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC UTILITIES | | | 561-822-2262 | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-20-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
03-20-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
03-20-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-12-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
02-12-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
02-12-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-12 11:38:54 | Z20010011 - 3200 ELECTRONICS WAY WHOLESALE YARD AND | | | STORAGE | | | | | | 1. THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF | | | REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY | | | AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND | | | WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE | | | DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK | | | BELOW: HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH= | | | ~\WPB_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION | | | -FULL-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC0 | | | 2A97B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF | | | THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE | | | FOUND HERE: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBL | | | IC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | 2. CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, | | | FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08, ADOPTED | | | SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18) | | | CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. SEC. 90-7. | | | POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER SERVICE | | | FACILITIES OF THE CITY. | | | THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE | | | CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY | | | BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS, | | | BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION. | | | 3. AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR | | | MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI | | | CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL | | | 4. PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY | | | OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC | | | RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF | | | YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE | | | MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL | | | IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT | | | [email protected] OR 561-494-1040 FOR FURTHER | | | ASSISTANCE. | | | 5. PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS | | | OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES, | | | INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND | | | SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, | | | METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE | | | SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING | | | GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, | | | ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL | | | INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER | | | LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE | | | PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN | | | VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. | | | PLEASE SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT | | | MATERIAL. ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL | | | EXISTING AND PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, | | | INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & | | | TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL | | | UTILITY CROSSINGS. | | | 6. CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY | | | ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY | | | RIGHT OF WAY. | | | 7. PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE | | | DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB | | | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION). | | | 8. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND | | | PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM | | | AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE | | | PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER. | | | 9. SHOW VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION INFORMATION | | | (NAVD 88 AND NGVD 29). | | | 10. PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER ALONG | | | ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE. | | | 11. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND | | | IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED | | | AREAS. | | | 12. PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS JUST NORTH OF UTILITY | | | EASEMENT FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS. | | | 13. PLEASE LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE | | | APPLICABLE. | | | 14. PROPOSED WATER METER PLACEMENT SHALL NOT BE BEHIND | | | FENCE; MUST BE ACCESSIBLE BY CITY UTILITIES STAFF. | | | 15. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH PLANNING REGARDING PROXIMITY | | | OF PROPOSED ELECTRIC FENCE TO PUBLIC SIDEWALK. | | | 16. COORDINATE WITH MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE | | | SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING | | | PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT | | | HIM AT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected] | | | 17. PROVIDE DEDICATED UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS | | | FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. | | | 18. CONFIRM PROPOSED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE IS COMPLAINT | | | WITH LATEST CITY STANDARD DETAIL GC-8. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD | | | CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, | | | PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]: | | | | | | 1) -NEED SEPARATE UTILITY PLAN CREATED AND SUBMITTED. | | | 2) -WATER METER SHOULD BE LABELED WITH SIZE AND | | | REFERENCE TO APPROPRIATE WATER SERVICE STANDARD DETAIL. | | | WATER SERVICE LINE NEEDS TO BE LABELED WITH MATERIAL. | | | 3) -METER BOX SHOULD NOT BE IN FENCES OR GATES. WATER | | | SERVICE LINE SHOULD NOT RUN THROUGH DRIVEWAY. | | | 4) -THERE IS AN AREA MARKED 10 FT. IS IT A UTILITY | | | EASEMENT? IF SO ADD U.E. TO LABEL. | | | 5) -NEED WATER DEMAND CHART ON UTILITY PLAN. | | | 6) -ADD COPY OF WATER SERVICE STANDARD DETAILS USED TO | | | THE UTILITY PLAN. | | | 7) -WILL ANY OF THE WATER SERVICES BE USED FOR FIRE | | | SPRINKLERS? IF SO, THEN WOULD NEED SEPARATE DEDICATED | | | FIRE SERVICE. | | | 8) -ELECTRIC FENCE SHOULD NOT BE CLOSE TO SIDEWALK -> | | | SAFETY HAZARD FOR PEDESTRIANS. IF WATER PIPE BETWEEN | | | BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND METER IS RUNNING UNDER ELECTRIC | | | FENCE, THEN IT SHOULD BE SLEEVED. | | | | | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | CONCERNS, THANKS. | | | RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR - ENGINEERING | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-13-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
02-13-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
02-13-2020 |
Time |
11:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-13 11:58:00 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE | | | OCCUPANCY TYPE, PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | AND WHETHER IT IS MIXED OR SEPARATED OCCUPANCY. | | | | | | 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE | | | LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER | | | SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED | | | ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | A FIRE HYDRANT COULD NOT BE IDENTIFIED ON THE SITE | | | PLAN, PLEASE PROVIDE THE NEAREST FIRE HYDRANT LOCATION | | | ON THE SITE PLAN FOR BUILDING PLAN SUBMITTALS. | | | | | | 9. IF APPLICABLE, PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR | | | FIRE ALARM PER OCCUPANCY FIRE CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY | | | ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM, | | | ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FS 61G AND | | | SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PERMIT. | | | | | | 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE | | | SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY | | | DOOR LOCKS AND KNOX KEY SWITCHES FOR GAES BE PROVIDED | | | FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS. | | | | | | 12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
04-23-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
04-23-2020 |
Time |
16:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
04-23-2020 |
Time |
16:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-04-23 16:12:19 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 3200 ELECTRONICS WAY Z20010011 | | | APRIL 23, 2020 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN. TREES | | | WITHIN THE PROPERTY MUST BE IDENTIFIED AND SHOWN | | | WHETHER THEY WILL REMAIN, BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED. ANY | | | TREES TO REMAIN MUST BE INCLUDED ON THE PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. CORRECT ALL CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED | | | TREES FOR EACH BUFFER PORTION ON THE LANDSCAPE | | | REQUIREMENTS CHART TO SHOW 248? BUFFER LENGTHS REQUIRE | | | 9 TREES, AND 551? BUFFER LENGTHS REQUIRE 19 TREES FOR A | | | TOTAL OF 56. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. CORRECT TOTAL TREES PROVIDED TO COUNT THE | | | DOUBLE MONTGOMERY PALMS AS 8 DOUBLES EQUALS 16 DIVIDED | | | BY 3 EQUALS 5 TREE CREDIT. | | | 4. SATISFIED. CORRECT FOUNDATION PLANTING TO 20% FOR | | | INDUSTRIAL PER SECTION 94-443(E)(2). | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER AND SEWER LINES | | | ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH | | | LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. SHOW THAT THE REQUIRED PARKING LOT TREES | | | MEET THE 75% SHADE TREE REQUIREMENT. 8 TREES ARE | | | REQUIRED, 6 MUST BE CATEGORY 1. | | | | | | TREES INCLUDED FOR STORAGE AREAS ARE NOT REQUIRED | | | PARKING LOT TREES. THE REQUIRED TREES ARE IN TERMINAL | | | LANDSCAPE ISLANDS. | | | 8. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. | | | PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT | | | MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE ON THE PLAN BASED ON THE | | | PLANT LIST. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-30-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-30-2020 |
Time |
16:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-30-2020 |
Time |
16:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-03-30 16:59:11 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 3200 ELECTRONICS WAY Z20010011 | | | MARCH 30, 2020 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN. TREES | | | WITHIN THE PROPERTY MUST BE IDENTIFIED AND SHOWN | | | WHETHER THEY WILL REMAIN, BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED. ANY | | | TREES TO REMAIN MUST BE INCLUDED ON THE PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. CORRECT ALL CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED | | | TREES FOR EACH BUFFER PORTION ON THE LANDSCAPE | | | REQUIREMENTS CHART TO SHOW 248? BUFFER LENGTHS REQUIRE | | | 9 TREES, AND 551? BUFFER LENGTHS REQUIRE 19 TREES FOR A | | | TOTAL OF 56. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. CORRECT TOTAL TREES PROVIDED TO COUNT THE | | | DOUBLE MONTGOMERY PALMS AS 8 DOUBLES EQUALS 16 DIVIDED | | | BY 3 EQUALS 5 TREE CREDIT. | | | 4. SATISFIED. CORRECT FOUNDATION PLANTING TO 20% FOR | | | INDUSTRIAL PER SECTION 94-443(E)(2). | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER AND SEWER LINES | | | ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH | | | LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW THAT THE REQUIRED PARKING | | | LOT TREES MEET THE 75% SHADE TREE REQUIREMENT. 8 TREES | | | ARE REQUIRED, 6 MUST BE CATEGORY 1. | | | TREES INCLUDED FOR STORAGE AREAS ARE NOT REQUIRED | | | PARKING LOT TREES. THE REQUIRED TREES ARE IN TERMINAL | | | LANDSCAPE ISLANDS. | | | | | | 8. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION | | | 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF | | | PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE ON THE PLAN BASED ON THE | | | PLANT LIST. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-10-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
02-10-2020 |
Time |
16:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
02-10-2020 |
Time |
16:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-10 16:27:47 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 3200 ELECTRONICS WAY Z20010011 | | | FEBRUARY 10, 2020 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN. TREES WITHIN THE | | | PROPERTY MUST BE IDENTIFIED AND SHOWN WHETHER THEY WILL | | | REMAIN, BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED. ANY TREES TO REMAIN | | | MUST BE INCLUDED ON THE PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 2. CORRECT ALL CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED TREES FOR EACH | | | BUFFER PORTION ON THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CHART TO | | | SHOW 248? BUFFER LENGTHS REQUIRE 9 TREES, AND 551? | | | BUFFER LENGTHS REQUIRE 19 TREES FOR A TOTAL OF 56. | | | | | | 3. CORRECT TOTAL TREES PROVIDED TO COUNT THE DOUBLE | | | MONTGOMERY PALMS AS 8 DOUBLES EQUALS 16 DIVIDED BY 3 | | | EQUALS 5 TREE CREDIT. | | | 4. CORRECT FOUNDATION PLANTING TO 20% FOR INDUSTRIAL | | | PER SECTION 94-443(E)(2). | | | | | | 5. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN | | | TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 6. SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER AND SEWER LINES ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 7. SHOW THAT THE REQUIRED PARKING LOT TREES MEET THE | | | 75% SHADE TREE REQUIREMENT. 8 TREES ARE REQUIRED, 6 | | | MUST BE CATEGORY 1. | | | 8. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT | | | SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL | | | ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT | | | SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF | | | SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA | | | WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA | | | LANDSCAPES. | | | PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE ON THE PLAN BASED ON THE | | | PLANT LIST. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-17-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
03-17-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
03-17-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-03-17 10:33:24 | | | | NO FURTHER COMMENTS FROM DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS. | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-11-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
02-11-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
02-11-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-11 11:55:09 | | | | 1- FOR A FREESTANDING SITE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, THE | | | ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST REVISION OF CITY | | | OF WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE | | | ENCLOSURE STANDARD, CG-8. DUMPSTER DETAIL PROVIDED | | | (SHEET SP-1) DOES NOT COMPLY TO CG-8, REVISION DATE | | | JUNE 2019. | | | 2- PLEASE PROVIDE AUTO TURN FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, | | | FRONT LOADER TRUCK WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECS: | | | - TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT | | | - TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT | | | - TURNING RADIUS: | | | - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT | | | - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT | | | - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-26-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
05-26-2020 |
Time |
10:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
05-26-2020 |
Time |
10:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-05-26 10:24:41 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | 5/01/2020 SUBMITTAL REVIEW PACKAGE. THEY CAN BE | | | ADDRESSED PRIOR TO THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION | | | SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 1. SHEET 2 OF 8 EROSION CONTROL | | | A. SHOW PROTECTION OF INLETS WITHIN THE ELECTRONICS WAY | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | B. SHOW SIDEWALK DEMOLITION FOR THE PROPOSED NORTH AND | | | SOUTH DRIVEWAYS. | | | | | | 2. SHEET 3 OF 8 ENGINEERING PLAN | | | A. PROVIDE THE PROPOSED ELEVATION TO BE CORED AT THE | | | EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE WEST OF THE CONTROL | | | STRUCTURE. | | | B. THE MINIMUM PERIMETER ELEVATION IS SHOWN AS 14.30 | | | FEET NAVD AT THE TWO DRIVEWAYS AND ALONG THE EDGE OF | | | PAVEMENT OF THE NORTH STORAGE AREA. THIS ELEVATION IS | | | TO BE SET EQUAL TO OR ABOVE THE MINIMUM ELEVATION FOR | | | CONTROLLED STORMWATER DISCHARGE FROM THE SITE PER SFWMD | | | ERP CRITERIA. THE WEIR ELEVATION AT THE CONTROL | | | STRUCTURE IS SET AT 14.30 FEET NAVD, THE SAME AS THE | | | PERIMETER ELEVATION. IS A CONTROL STRUCTURE NEEDED? | | | C. IT APPEARS THE SITE IS DESIGNED TO FLOOD PRIOR TO | | | ANY OFFSITE DISCHARGE. NONE OF THE ONSITE CATCH BASIN | | | GRATE ELEVATIONS ARE LOWER THAN THE WEIR ELEVATION. | | | | | | 3. SHEET 4 OF 8 CROSS SECTIONS | | | A. ADD VERTICAL DATUM NOTE AND CONVERSION EQUATION TO | | | NGVD1929. | | | B. LABEL THE LANDSCAPE BUFFERS AND DIMENSIONS ON THE | | | APPROPRIATE SECTIONS. | | | C. SHOW A BERM AND MINIMUM BERM/PERIMETER ELEVATION ON | | | THE APPROPRIATE SECTIONS. | | | D. SHOW AND DIMENSION THE LOCATION OF PROPOSED/EXISTING | | | FENCES FROM PROPERTY LINE ON THE SECTIONS. [REPEAT | | | COMMENT] | | | E. SECTION B-B | | | 1. THE GRAVITY WALL APPEARS TO BE FACING THE WRONG | | | DIRECTION. | | | 2. CONFIRM THE GRAVITY WALL CAN BE LOCATED WITHIN THE | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFER. | | | F. SECTION D-D | | | THE RESPONSE REGARDING THE ENCROACHMENT ONTO THE | | | PROPERTY NORTH OF 3200 ELECTRONICS WAY STATED BOTH | | | PROPERTIES ARE OWNED BY THE SAME OWNER. THE PROPERTY | | | APPRAISER?S WEBSITE INDICATES SEPARATE ENTITIES OWN | | | EACH PARCEL. THE CITY?S LAW DEPARTMENT HAS BEEN ASKED | | | IF A MORE FORMAL DOCUMENT (AND PERHAPS RECORDED IN THE | | | PUBLIC RECORDS) IS NEEDED BEYOND THE LETTER THAT WAS | | | PROVIDED BY THE NORTH PROPERTY OWNER. | | | G. SECTION E-E ? | | | 1. ADD THE CROSS SLOPE FOR THE SIDEWALK. | | | 2. STEEPEN THE DRIVEWAY SLOPE BEHIND THE SIDEWALK TO | | | REDUCE THE LENGTH OF DRIVEWAY DRAINING TO THE RIGHT OF | | | WAY. | | | H. SECTION G-G ? | | | 1. ADD THE CROSS SLOPE FOR THE SIDEWALK. | | | 2. STEEPEN THE DRIVEWAY SLOPE BEHIND THE SIDEWALK TO | | | REDUCE THE LENGTH OF DRIVEWAY DRAINING TO THE RIGHT OF | | | WAY. | | | 3. THE PLAN VIEW ON SHEET 3 SHOWS THE 14.30 SPOT GRADE | | | MORE THAN 18 FEET FROM THE BACK OF SIDEWALK. | | | 4. SHEET 5 OF 8 | | | A. CONTROL STRUCTURE DETAIL ? PROVIDE ELEVATIONS OF | | | GRATE, INVERTS AND WEIR. | | | B. ADD VERTICAL DATUM NOTE AND CONVERSION EQUATION TO | | | NGVD1929. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 (O) | | | 561-351-0510 (M) | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-28-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
04-28-2020 |
Time |
21:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
04-28-2020 |
Time |
22:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-04-28 22:01:28 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE APRIL | | | 20, 2020 SUBMITTAL REVIEW PACKAGE. | | | | | | SHEET 2 OF 7 EROSION CONTROL SHEET | | | 1. MOVE GRAVEL ENTRANCE OUT OF THE RIGHT OF WAY AND | | | ONTO THE SITE. THE SIDEWALK ALONG THE FRONTAGE SHOULD | | | REMAIN ACCESSIBLE AT ALL TIMES EXCEPT WHEN PORTIONS ARE | | | BEING REPLACED WITH 6" THICK CONCRETE AT THE PROPOSED | | | DRIVEWAY CONNECTIONS. | | | | | | SHEET 3 OF 7 ENGINEERING PLAN | | | 2. INCLUDE ADDITIONAL FLOW ARROWS AT THE DRIVEWAYS WEST | | | OF SIDEWALK TO SHOW RUNOFF WILL FLOW TO THE ONSITE | | | CACTCH BASINS. | | | | | | 3. ADDITONAL PROPOSED GRADES WILL BE NEEDED ON THE | | | ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL PLANS TO SHOW HOW MOST OF | | | THE STORMWATER RUNOFF WILL JUST FLOW TO THE LOWEST | | | CATCH BASIN IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE. | | | | | | 4. REPLACE EXISTING SIDEWALK WITH 6" THICK CONCRETE AT | | | PROPOSED DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS. | | | | | | 5. SHOW DETENTION AREA(S) (TOE OF SLOPE LINES) PROPOSED | | | BEHIND THE SIDEWALK IN THE EAST AREA OF THE SITE. | | | | | | SHEET 4 OF 6 CROSS SECTIONS | | | | | | 6. LABEL MINIMUM PERIMETER ELEVATION BASED ON SFWMD | | | CRITERIA. | | | | | | 7. SECTION B-B: SHOW SWALE SECTION IN 5' LANDSCAPE AREA | | | TO KEEP RUNOFF FROM FLOWING DIRECTLY ONTO ADJACENT | | | PROPERTY. | | | | | | 8. SECTION D-D: | | | A. SECTION SHOWS ENCROACHMENT ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTY | | | INCLUDING 2' OF "BERM" AND SIDE SLOPE DOWN TO MEET | | | EXISTING GRADE ON ADJACENT PROPERTY. PROVIDE AGREEMENT | | | FROM ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER FOR THIS ENCROACHMENT AND | | | WHO WILL MAINTAIN IT. | | | | | | B. IF #8A. CANNOT BE OBTAINED, SHOW A SWALE SECTION | | | SOUTH OF THE PROPERTY LINE TO KEEP RUNOFF FROM FLOWING | | | DIRECTLY ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTY. | | | | | | C. DIMENSION THE LOCATION OF THE FENCE FROM THE | | | PROPERTY LINE OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT. | | | | | | D. INDICATE WHERE THE FENCE ON THE NORTH PROPERTY WILL | | | BE LOCATED IF #8A IS OBTAINED. | | | | | | E. HOW WILL THE PERIMETER LANDSCAPING OUTSIDE THE FENCE | | | BE MAINTAINED? | | | | | | 9. SECTIONS E-E AND G-G: | | | A. SHOW CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON IN THE RIGHT OF WAY. | | | | | | B. REPLACE THE EXISTING SIDEWALK WITH 6" THICK | | | CONCRETE. | | | | | | C. SHOW SWALE SECTION IN DRIVEWAY FOR DRAINAGE | | | CONVEYANCE ACROSS THE DRIVEWAY. THE 2% CROSS SLOPE MAY | | | NOT BE VALID. | | | | | | D. DIMENSION THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED FENCE FROM | | | THE PROPERTY LINE OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT. | | | | | | E. MOVE THE PROPERTY LINE TO THE BACK OF SIDEWALK. | | | | | | SHEET 5 OF 7 DETAILS: | | | 10. ELIMINATE THE BLEEDER IN THE CONTROL STRUCTURE. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 | | | 561-351-0510 (M) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-24-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
03-24-2020 |
Time |
15:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
03-24-2020 |
Time |
15:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-03-24 15:06:58 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE MARCH | | | 16, 2020 REVIEW SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. | | | | | | 1. SITE PLAN AND ENGINEERING PLAN SHOW CURBING ACROSS | | | THE SIDEWALK. THE SIDEWALK SHOULD NOT BE INTERRUPTED BY | | | CURBING. | | | | | | 2. PARKING AND STRIPING DETAIL ON SHEET SP-1 DIMENSIONS | | | 3 FEET FROM THE EDGE OF SIDEWALK TO THE BACK OF THE | | | WHEEL STOP AND ALSO INCLUDES THE LABEL ?2? TO BACK OF | | | WHEEL STOP, TYP.?. | | | | | | 3. SITE PLAN ON LIGHTING PLAN DIFFERS FROM THE SITE | | | PLAN ON SHEET SP-1. | | | | | | 4. USE LEFT TURN ARROW PAVEMENT MARKING AT NORTH | | | DRIVEWAY. | | | | | | 5. PER SECTION 78-34 OF THE CITY?S MUNICIPAL CODE, | | | DRIVEWAYS ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED PER THE CITY?S PLANS | | | AND SPECIFICATIONS. THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | ONLY HAS A DRIVEWAY DETAIL FOR CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS (GC-5 | | | [2019]). THIS DETAIL LIMITS THE DRIVEWAY WIDTH TO 20 | | | FEET AT THE PROPERTY LINE. THE DRIVEWAY FLARE SHOULD BE | | | DESIGNED PER FDOT PLAN 522-003 SINCE THERE IS MORE THAN | | | 10 FEET BETWEEN THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT AND THE SIDEWALK | | | (UTILITY STRIP). | | | | | | 6. DESIGN THE SOUTH DRIVEWAY APRON TO NOT INCLUDE THE | | | EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE. | | | | | | 7. THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PLAN CALLS OUT 10 FEET | | | WIDE EXFILTRATION TRENCH BUT THE EXFILTRATION DETAIL | | | SHOWS 6? TRENCH WIDTH. | | | | | | 8. CONFIRM DRAINAGE INLET TYPE C1 IS LARGE ENOUGH TO | | | CONSTRUCT PRB?S ON ADJACENT OR OPPOSITE WALLS DEPENDING | | | ON WHICH SIDES ARE CONNECTED TO EXFILTRATION TRENCHES. | | | | | | 9. WATER METER IS SHOWN OUTSIDE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY. | | | CONFIRM THE 10' UTILITY EASEMENT IS AVAILABLE FOR | | | PUBLIC UTILITIES. | | | | | | 10. REMOVE NOTE ?TIE IN TO EXISTING 8? PVC SEWER? SHOWN | | | NEAR SOUTH DRIVEWAY. IT DOESN?T APPEAR TO BE APPLICABLE | | | WITH THE CURRENT SEWER DESIGN. | | | | | | 11. SHOW THE AREA BETWEEN BACK OF SIDEWALK AND NEW | | | FENCE LINE IS TO DRAIN TO THE CONTROL STRUCTURE. | | | | | | 12. ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATION VIEWS LIST THE FFE AS | | | 17.50? NAVD. THE PRELMINARY ENGINEERING PLAN LISTS THE | | | FFE AS 15.50? NAVD. | | | | | | 13. WHEEL STOPS OR CURBING IS NEEDED BETWEEN | | | PARKING/VEHICULAR ACCESS AREAS AND THE LANDSCAPED | | | AREAS. | | | | | | 14. IN THE LEGEND ON THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PLAN | | | INCLUDE THE HATCHING PATTERN SHOWN AROUND THE MONUMENT | | | SIGN AND BIKE RACKS. | | | | | | 15. PROVIDE PRB DETAIL. | | | | | | 16. LABEL PIPES SIZES AND MATERIAL FOR EXISTING | | | UTILITIES IN THE RIGHT OF WAY. | | | | | | 17. PROVIDE MORE HORIZONTAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE | | | PARALLEL EXFILTRATION TRENCHES SO THAT THE FUNCTION OF | | | ONE DOES NOT AFFECT THE OTHER AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF | | | THE SECOND TRENCH DRAIN WILL NOT AFFECT THE FIRST | | | CONSTRUCTED TRENCH DRAIN. | | | | | | 18. PROVIDE A DRAWING IDENTIFYING THE SANITARY AND | | | STORMWATER STRUCTURE NUMBERS AND PIPES AS LISTED ON THE | | | CCTV LOGS. | | | | | | 19. PROVIDE COPIES OF THE CCTV VIDEOS AND PICTURES OF | | | THE OBSERVATIONS LISTED ON THE CCTV REPORTS. | | | | | | 20. REMOVE TYPE ?D? CURB IN THE RIGHT OF WAY NEXT TO | | | THE NORTH DRIVEWAY APRON. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-10-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
02-10-2020 |
Time |
17:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
02-10-2020 |
Time |
17:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-10 17:24:22 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | | | APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. CONFIRM THE DIAMETER AND MATERIAL OF THE EXISTING | | | STORM PIPES WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | | | | 2. THE CITY USES NGVD1929 AS THE VERTICAL DATUM. THE | | | CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988 PROVIDED THE | | | CONVERSION BETWEEN NAVD1988 AND NGVD1929 IS INCLUDED. | | | PROVIDE THE NAVD1988 / NGVD1929 CNVERSION EQUATION ON | | | THE SURVEY. | | | | | | 3. REMOVE THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY AND RESTORE THE SWALE. | | | | | | 4. REPLACE SIDEWALK FLAGS WITH THE UTILITIES CROSSING | | | ACROSS THE SIDEWALK.. | | | | | | 5. REPLACE SIDEWALK WITH 6" THICK CONCRETE AT THE NEW | | | DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS. | | | | | | 6. NORTH DRIVEWAY APRON AFFECTING THE EXISTING ADA | | | PAD/CURBING FOR THE BUS STOP. | | | | | | 7. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FOR ALL SIDES OF THE PROPERTY | | | SHOWING PERIMETER BERM AND HOW DEVELOPMENT WILL CONNECT | | | TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. | | | | | | 8. PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS WILL AFFECT THE SWALE DRAINAGE. | | | | | | 9. RCP PIPE TO BE USED WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY. | | | | | | 10. CONSIDER USING THE EXISTING CONNECTION TO THE MS4 | | | OR MOVING THE CONNECTION TO THE STRUCTURE SOUTH OF THE | | | NORTH DRIVEWAY. REMOVE EXISTING PIPE CONNECTION TO MS4 | | | IF NOT USED. | | | | | | 11. SHOW PRBS IN ALL STRUCTURES CONNECTED TO AN | | | EXILTRATION TRENCH. | | | | | | 12. DRIVEWAY APRONS SHOULD BE SHOWN AS CONCRETE. | | | | | | 13. SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | | | | 14. PART OF SITE FALLS WITHIN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD | | | AREA (SFHA). A MINIMUM OF 2 FEET OF FREEBOARD ABOVE THE | | | BASE FLOOD ELEVATION IS REQUIRED FOR STRUCTURES ON | | | PARCELS WITHIN A SFHA. | | | | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE | | | ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED | | | WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP PERMIT PRIOR TO | | | STARTING CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-19-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
03-19-2020 |
Time |
11:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-03-19 11:27:21 | PASSED WITH CONDITIONAL OF APPROVAL REQUIRING UNITY OF | | | TITLE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-07-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
02-07-2020 |
Time |
11:20 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-07 11:44:58 | 1. A UNITY OF TITLE WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | 2. ENG. PLANS SHOW A 10' ELECTRIC FENCE ALONG | | | ELECTRONICS WAY? | | | 3. CAN EXISTING METER IN SW CORNER BE UTILIZED? | | | 4. PROPOSED CURB WILL NEED TO BE ADJUSTED OFF OF | | | EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
05-12-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-05-12 09:25:21 | PASSED. | | | | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] | | | (TUESDAYS TO THURSDAYS) | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
04-29-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-04-29 10:58:29 | PASSED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION: | | | 1. PROVIDE DIAGONAL HATCH ON THE SITE DRIVEWAYS TO | | | REDUCE THE WIDTH FOR PASSENGER CARS AT THE TIME OF | | | ENGINEERING PLAN SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] | | | (TUESDAYS TO THURSDAYS) | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
03-25-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-03-25 09:44:21 | 1. REDUCE THE NORTHERN CURB RADIUS OF THE SOUTHERN | | | DRIVEWAY TO NOT MORE THAN 20 FEET SINCE TRUCKS ARE NOT | | | EXPECTED TO ENTER FROM THE NORTH. | | | 2. PROVIDE DIAGONAL HATCH ON THE SITE DRIVEWAYS TO | | | REDUCE THE WIDTH FOR PASSENGER CARS. | | | | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] | | | (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS) | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
02-12-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-12 13:09:22 | TRAFFIC STATEMENT COMMENTS: | | | 1. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER. | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | 2. ONLY ONE ACCESS POINT IS ALLOWED ON ELECTRONICS WAY | | | PER CITY CODE 94-312. | | | 3. THE NORTHERN DRIVEWAY WILL BE IMPACTED BY BUS | | | LOADING/UNLOADING AT THE BUS STOP AND IS IN CONFLICT | | | WITH THE EXISTING BUS STOP. PLEASE ELIMINATE THE | | | NORTHERN DRIVEWAY. | | | 4. CONVERT THE SOUTHERN DRIVEWAY TO TWO-WAY OPERATIONS. | | | 5. USE DROP CURB INSTEAD OF CURBED DRIVEWAY. | | | 6. THE ENTRY GATE SHOULD BE LOCATED AT LEAST 25 FEET | | | FROM THE BACK OF SIDEWALK. | | | 7. PROVIDE AUTOTURN PATH SHOWING DELIVERY AND SERVICE | | | TRUCK PATHS. | | | 8. COORDINATE WITH PALM TRAN ON THE EXISTING BUS STOP | | | ON ELECTRONICS WAY. | | | | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] | | | (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS) | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
04-21-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rfalcone |
Date |
04-21-2020 |
Time |
14:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rfalcone |
Date |
04-21-2020 |
Time |
14:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-26-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rfalcone |
Date |
03-26-2020 |
Time |
14:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rfalcone |
Date |
03-26-2020 |
Time |
14:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-03-26 14:29:50 | PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW | | | ________________________________________ | | | | | | DATE OF REVIEW: 03/26/2020 | | | PROJECT NO.: Z20010011 | | | CASE NO.: ISPR 20-10 | | | ________________________________________ | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING | | | REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE THE BUILDING HEIGHT ON SHEET A2. | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE THE PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT IN SITE DATE | | | TABLE ON SHEET SP-1. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON SHEET SP-1. | | | | | | 4. REVISE THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN TO BE CONSISTANT WITH | | | THE UPDATED SITE PLAN. | | | | | | 5. THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN AND SITE PLAN ARE LABELED | | | "SP-1." PROVIDE A DIFFERENT SHEET NUMBER FOR THE | | | PHOTMETRIC PLAN. | | | ________________________________________ | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: | | | | | | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL | | | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. | | | | | | B) 6 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X | | | 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. | | | | | | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE | | | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE | | | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL | | | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. | | | | | | ________________________________________ | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | RACHEL FALCONE, ASSOCIATE PLANNER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 | | | | | | P: 561.822.1442 | | | TTY: 800.955.8771 | | | E: [email protected] | | | | | | W: WPB.ORG | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-12-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rfalcone |
Date |
02-12-2020 |
Time |
08:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rfalcone |
Date |
02-12-2020 |
Time |
08:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-12 13:08:41 | GENERAL COMMENTS | | | 1. REVISE THE PROJECT NUMBER IN THE SITE DATA TABLE | | | 2. PROVIDE A LEGEND FOR SYMBOLS/LINES. | | | 3. CORRECT THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING IN | | | THE SITE DATA TABLE. | | | 4. CLARIFY THE SITE DATA TABLE (SOME NUMBERS ARE | | | PROPOSED, SOME PROVIDED--THIS PROVIDES CONFUSION ON | | | ITEMS THAT HAVE NEITHER DESIGNATION). | | | 5. PROVIDE MISSING ELEMENTS (PERCENT OF IMPERVIOUS | | | AREA, PERCENT OF WATER BODIES). | | | 6. WHAT OFFICE USE IS BEING USED FOR THE OFFICE PARKING | | | CALCULATION IN THE DATA TABLE? | | | 7. CORRECT THE MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT ON THE SITE DATA | | | TABLE. | | | | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS | | | 1. PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE STORAGE TRAILERS | | | 2. PROVIDE THE DIMENSION STORAGE TRAILERS AND DISTANCE | | | OF THE STORAGE TRAILERS TO THE PROPERTY LINES | | | 3. PURSUANT ZLDR SEC. 94-315(B)(1), SCREENING . OUTDOOR | | | STORAGE OF GOODS, MERCHANDISE AND MATERIALS SHALL NOT | | | BE PERMITTED UNLESS ENCLOSED ON ALL SIDES BY A WALL OF | | | ADEQUATE HEIGHT CONSTRUCTED OF BRICK, DECORATIVE | | | CONCRETE, OTHER DECORATIVE MASONRY, OR COMPARABLY | | | DURABLE WOOD OR STEEL. PLEASE REMOVE THE EXISTING CHAIN | | | LINKED FENCE AND REPLACE WITH A WALL TO COMPLY WITH | | | ZONING REGULATIONS. | | | 4. PURSUANT ZLDR SEC. 94-174(5), MAXIMUM BUILDING | | | HEIGHT: 50 FEET. REVISE THE BUILDING HEIGHT TO COMPLY | | | WITH ZONING REGULATIONS. | | | 5. PROVIDE THE HEIGHT OF THE SECURITY GATE. | | | 6. PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE PROPOSED ANGLE PARKING | | | SPACES. | | | 7. PROVIDE ALL DIMENSIONS OF PARKING AREAS/SPACES. | | | 8. 16 FEET PARKING STALLS MAY BE USED FOR PARKING IF | | | THERE IS AN OVERHANG PROVIDED OVER A LANDSCAPED AREA. | | | 18 FEET PARKING WITH A WHEEL STOP IS REQUIRED IN PLACES | | | WHERE A CURB AND OVERHANG OVER LANDSCAPED MATERIAL IS | | | NOT PROVIDED. PROVIDE CLARITY BETWEEN THE SOD A AND | | | OTHER MATERIALS ON THE PLAN AS IT IS CURRENTLY UNCLEAR. | | | 9. HOW WILL PEDESTRIANS ACCESS THE STRUCTURE FROM THE | | | PARKING AREA? | | | 10. IS THE EXISTING CONCRETE DRIVEWAY TO BE REMOVED? IF | | | SO, REMOVE ON PLANS. | | | 11. IS ACCESS TO THE PROPOSED LOADING SPACE OR DUMPSTER | | | BLOCKED BY EQUIPMENT STORAGE? CLARIFY OR SHOW ACCESS ON | | | THE PLANS. | | | 12. CLARIFY STORAGE LINES AND EQUIPMENT MERCHANDISE | | | STORAGE AREAS ON THE PLANS. IT IS CURRENTLY UNCLEAR. | | | 13. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED TO SWITCH THE ORIENTATION | | | OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE AND PARKING LOT TO HAVE THE | | | STRUCTURE CLOSER TO THE FRONT OF THE LOT. | | | 14. INCLUDE A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN TO SHOW SITE LIGHTING | | | (LOCATION, HEIGHT, AND INTENSITY OF ANY OUTDOOR | | | LIGHTING). | | | 15. IS ROOFTOP MATERIAL PROPOSED ON THE STRUCTURE? | | | 16. DIMENSION PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN. | | | 17. INDICATE IF THE DESIGNATED STORAGE AREAS ARE OPEN | | | AIR OR COVERED CANOPY. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | | CONTACT ME. | | | | | | RACHEL FALCONE, ASSOCIATE PLANNER | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | TEL: (561) 822-1442 | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |