Home Records and Reports Contractor Records Owner Records Permit Records Permit Reports Business Reports Property Records Business Tax My Account Code Enforcement Contact Us Log In/Out Print Plan Review Stops For Project Z19110020 Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) Rev No 2 Status P Date 10-22-2020 Cont ID   Sent By rbrown Date 10-22-2020 Time 11:46 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rbrown Date 10-22-2020 Time 11:46 Sent To   Notes 2020-10-22 11:48:12 WHEN SUBMITTING FOR BUILDING PERMIT PLEASE ADDESS THE   ADVISORY COMMENTS LISTED IN THE PREVIOUS REVIEW. Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) Rev No 1 Status P Date 12-10-2019 Cont ID   Sent By fmittner Date 12-03-2019 Time 13:27 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rbrown Date 12-10-2019 Time 20:14 Sent To   Notes 2019-12-10 20:22:48 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,   COMMENTS:       1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE   SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH   FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE   ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.       2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDINGS. AN ASBESTOS   SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT   REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH   COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963,   OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]       3. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THE PLANS SHALL BE   MARKED TO SHOW TWO VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES WHEN   SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. PER SECTION 208.2.4 OF FLORIDA   ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX REQUIRED   ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING   STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND DESIGNED IN   ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY   CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT   SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)       4. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,   THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR   THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,   AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE   FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.       5. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND   OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,   COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF   OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF   CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE   VERIFIED.       6. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES   NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO   MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL   BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE   EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED   TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR   OTHER APPROVED METHODS.       7. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. IF ANY OF THE RETAIL SPACES WILL   BE USED FOR RESTAURANTS A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE   REQUIRED. PLEASE CONTACT JEFFREY ODOMS, UTILITIES O&M   SUPERINTENDENT, PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT, FATS OILS   AND GREASE DIVISION, AT (561) 822-2172, OR BY EMAIL:   [email protected]       8. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS   AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE   WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED   FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,   GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND   OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,   SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.       9. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND   CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF   CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL   NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.       10. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER   AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,   INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE   CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF   NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION   THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.       11. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT   WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL   HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT   MICHAEL ORIO, GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494   1080, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]       12. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT   TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE   ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP   ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC   PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:   [email protected]       ROBERT BROWN   BUILDING OFFICIAL   TEL: 561 805 6652   EMAIL: [email protected]     Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 5 Status P Date 03-26-2021 Cont ID   Sent By rrossano Date 03-26-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By rrossano Date 03-26-2021 Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-03-26 11:55:05 ADDITIONAL PROVISO:   -IRRIGATION PLAN AND DETAILS CALL OUT PVB BACKFLOW   ASSEMBLY ADJACENT WATER METER. THAT DOES NOT MATCH   UTILITY PLAN AND NEEDS TO BE RP TYPE INSTEAD.   INSTALLATION OF BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND PIPING AROUND IT   MUST COMPLY WITH PUBLIC UTILITIES WATER SERVICE   STANDARD DETAIL FOR SMALL BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES (WS-6)   AND BE LEAD-FREE COMPLIANT AND USC-APPROVED.       COMMENTS PER MARK HURLEY   FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR   CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC UTILITIES   561-822-2262     Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 4 Status P Date 01-06-2021 Cont ID   Sent By rrossano Date 01-06-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By rrossano Date 01-06-2021 Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-01-06 08:38:47 PASSED WITH PROVISOS:       COMMENTS PER MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SVC.   SUPERVISOR, CITY OF WPB PUB. UTIL., [email protected],   561-822-2262:   -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL:   1) ADD GATE VALVES AT THE INTERSECTIONS FOR THE   REPLACEMENT 8INCH DIP WATER MAIN ON 2ND ST.   2) VERIFY EXISTING WATER MAIN ADJACENT EAST SIDE OF   PROPERTY ? (IT IS NOT SHOWING UP ON OUR GIS)   3) LABEL WATER MAINS ON ROSEMARY AVE WITH PIPE MATERIAL   TYPE AND SIZE.   -THE INCLUDED WATER SERVICE STANDARD DETAILS STILL HAVE   SOME WITH OUTDATED REVISION, WRONG TYPE USED, AND SOME   ARE MISSING SUCH SMALL WATER SERVICE AND SMALL BACKFLOW   ASSEMBLY. PLEASE ADD AND REVISE THEM AT FORMAL   ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL.   -IN ADDITION TO THE BACKFLOW COVENANT RECORDING   REQUIREMENT, FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY USED INSIDE   BUILDING MUST BE USC APPROVED FOR THE PROPOSED   ORIENTATION.   -CONFIRM THAT THE FDC IS AN ACCEPTABLE DISTANCE FROM   THE NEAREST FIRE HYDRANT.   -LANDSCAPE PLAN LP-1 SHOWS A TREE CLOSE TO GATE VALVES   NEAR TAP FOR THE DOMESTIC & IRRIGATION WATER SERVICES.   PLEASE PROVIDE MORE CLEARANCE AND/OR ADD ROOT BARRIERS.   -WILL PROVIDE FURTHER DETAILED COMMENTS FOR MINOR   ISSUES AT FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL.     Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 3 Status F Date 12-03-2020 Cont ID   Sent By rrossano Date 12-03-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By rrossano Date 12-03-2020 Time   Sent To   Notes 2020-12-03 14:03:00 COMMENTS PER RICK ROSSANO, PROJ. COORD, CITY OF WPB   ENG. SVCS., [email protected], 561-494-1098:       SUBMITTED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE AVG. DAILY FLOWS   DO NOT MATCH THOSE ON SHEET C2.1 OF CIVIL PLANS.       FOR ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES OF ALL   PROPOSED UTILITY CROSSINGS.       FOR ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE ENLARGED DETAIL ON   PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION OF WATER METERS AND BACKFLOW   PREVENTION UNITS.       FOR ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE LABEL MATERIALS OF   ALL EXISTING CITY WATER & SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE IN ROW.       FOR ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE PROJECT   ADDRESS.       COMMENTS PER MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SVC.   SUPERVISOR, CITY OF WPB PUB. UTIL., [email protected],   561-822-2262:   -SOME PRIOR COMMENTS WERE NOT SATISFIED. WILL LIST ONES   NEEDING ATTENTION AGAIN:   -CIVIL PLAN WATER SERVICE STANDARD DETAILS ARE OLD   REVISION. PLEASE REPLACE WITH MOST UPDATED REVISION.   -4 IN. DOMESTIC METER NEEDS TO BE ABOVE-GROUND   INSTALLATION AND NOT UNDERGROUND VAULT INSTALLATION.   PLEASE ADD ABOVE-GROUND WORDING TO LABEL ON C1.2 AND   REPLACE THE VAULT STANDARD DETAIL ON C2.3 WITH THE   ABOVE-GROUND INSTALLATION.   -4 IN. DIP WATER SERVICE IS BRANCHED INTO 1.5 IN. AND 4   IN. METERS. PLAN DESIGNER NEED VERIFY CUSTOMER WITH NOT   HAVE PROBLEMS USING WATER WITH THAT SETUP.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:   -NO WATER MAIN VALVES IN THE STREETS ARE SHOWN. PLEASE   ADD ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED GATE VALVES TO WATER   PLAN.   -ON WATER PLAN, REMOVE WORDING RPZ IN PUMP ROOM SINCE   CONTAINMENT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY WILL BE OUTSIDE   ADJACENT THE METER.   -WATER MAIN ON SAPODILLA IS NOT LABELED WITH PIPE   SIZING OR MATERIAL TYPE. PLEASE ADD SO CAN VERIFY WILL   ACCOMMODATE NEW 8IN. DIP. SIMILARLY ADD PIPE MATERIAL   TYPE TO WATER MAIN LABELING ON ROSEMARY.   -FIRE HYDRANT AT ROSEMARY AND 2ND IS PROPOSED TO BE IN   THE MIDDLE OF PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALK TRAFFIC. PLEASE   RELOCATE FIRE HYDRANT TO NEARBY AREA OUT OF PEDESTRIAN   TRAFFIC SINCE WATER MAIN IS BEING REPLACED.   -FDC IS PRIVATELY OWNED AND SHOULD NOT BE IN ROW.   PLEASE RELOCATE AND MAKE SURE NEW LOCATION IS NOT IN   PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC.   -THERE IS A CIRCULAR OBJECT IN SIDEWALK SLIGHTLY NE OF   FDC. PLEASE DESCRIBE WHAT IT IS AND LABEL ON PLAN.   -NEAR THE ENTRANCE ON 2ND ST, THERE APPEARS TO BE SOME   FIND OF GATES ENCROACHING INTO SIDEWALK. VERIFY IF THAT   IS ALLOWED BY CITY WPB.   -DCDA MAY NOT BE IN UNDERGROUND VAULT. NEED UPDATE   WATER PLAN.   -PAVEMENT RESTORATION LIMITS NEED TO BE UPDATED TO   REFLECT THE ENTIRE WATER MAIN THAT IS BEING REPLACED ON   2ND ST. ALSO INCLUDE THE INTERSECTIONS.   -EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT AT SAPODILLA AND 2ND STILL   APPEARS TO BE MISSING FROM WATER PLAN. PLEASE ADD AND   LABEL.   -CANNOT LOCATE A DEMO PLAN. PLEASE SUBMIT DEMO PLAN IF   THERE WILL BE DEMOLITION.   -STILL CANNOT LOCATE ON WATER PLAN EXISTING SMALL WATER   SERVICES ON 2ND AND 3RD ST. PLEASE ADD TO PLAN   -THERE ARE SEVERAL WATER METER BOXES IN THE SIDEWALK ON   SOUTH SIDE OF 3RD ST. PLEASE SHOW THEM ON THE PLANS AND   LABEL WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THEM.   -WILL ALL OF THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS FOR THE PROJECT BE   FED BY THE WATER SERVICES ON 2ND ST?   -LANDSCAPE TREES ON 2ND ST ARE CONFLICTING WITH THE   PROPOSED WATER MAIN. THE WORST ONE IS NEAR THE EAST   INTERSECTION ISLAND WHERE TREE AND WATER MAIN ARE AT   SAME LOCATION. THE OTHER TREES ARE CLOSE TO THE WATER   MAIN IN THE ISLANDS. PLEASE RESOLVE THOSE CONFLICTS.     Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-16-2020 Cont ID   Sent By RROSSANO Date 10-16-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By rrossano Date 10-16-2020 Time   Sent To   Notes 2020-10-16 19:49:03 COMMENTS PER RICK ROSSANO, PROJ. COORD, CITY OF WPB   ENG. SVCS., [email protected], 561-494-1098:       PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED   DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM AND PEAK)   AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PER FAC   64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER.       PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE   DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB   DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION).       FOR ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SHOW VERTICAL DATUM AND   DATUM CONVERSION INFORMATION (NAVD 88 AND NGVD 29).       FOR ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SHOW ALL FRANCHISE   UTILITIES.       FOR ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD PAVEMENT RESTORATION   NOTE.       FOR ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE ENLARGED DETAIL ON   PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW   PREVENTION. PROVIDE UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS   FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO PROPOSED UTILITIES INCLUDING   WATER METERS.       COMMENTS PER MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SVC.   SUPERVISOR, CITY OF WPB PUB. UTIL., [email protected],   561-822-2262:       -CIVIL PLAN WATER SERVICE STANDARD DETAILS ARE OLD   REVISION. PLEASE REPLACE WITH MOST UPDATED REVISION.   SHEET C1.2   -THERE APPEAR TO BE SEVERAL WATER MAIN GATE VALVES IN   CURBS. PLEASE DO NOT LOCATE VALVE BOXES IN CURBS.   -4 IN. DOMESTIC METER NEEDS TO BE ABOVE-GROUND   INSTALLATION AND NOT UNDERGROUND VAULT INSTALLATION.   PLEASE ADD ?ABOVE-GROUND? TO LABEL AND REPLACE THE WS-6   WITH THE CORRECT STANDARD DETAILS.   -RECOMMEND PARALLEL/DUAL BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES FOR THE 4   IN. DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE TO MINIMIZE WATER OUTAGES   DURING BACKFLOW MAINTENANCE.   -4 IN. DIP WATER SERVICE IS BRANCHED INTO 1.5 IN. AND 4   IN. METERS. PLAN DESIGNER NEED VERIFY CUSTOMER WITH NOT   HAVE PROBLEMS USING WATER WITH THAT SETUP. FOR   ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ALSO LABEL THAT BRANCH WITH TYPE   OF FITTING/TAP AND WATER SERVICE PIPING FEEDING 1.5 IN.   IRRIGATION METER.   -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL ADD WATER DEMAND   CALCULATIONS TO WATER PLAN AND LABEL FIRELINE POINT OF   SERVICE GATE VALVE.   -UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE NEEDED AROUND WATER METERS AND   WATER SERVICE PIPING ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. PLEASE ADD   AND LABEL ON PLAN.   -EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTS STILL APPEAR TO BE MISSING FROM   PLAN. PLEASE ADD AND LABEL.   -4 IN. DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE HAS AN ISOLATION BACKFLOW   ASSEMBLY CALLED OUT IN FIRE ROOM. THIS MIGHT BE AN   ERROR BETWEEN REVISIONS. CONTAINMENT BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY   FOR DOMESTIC MAY NOT BE INSIDE BUILDING.   -8 IN. DCDA MAY NOT BE UNDERGROUND. IF NEED TO MEET   FIRE DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS REGARDING COLLAPSE ZONES,   DCDA MAY BE LOCATED INSIDE BUILDING IF BACKFLOW   COVENANT IS COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED BY PROPERTY OWNER.   -SHOW EXISTING WATER SERVICES RUNNING NORTH AND SOUTH   OF EXISTING WATER MAINS ON 2ND ST FOR FORMAL   ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL.   -VERIFY THAT WATER MAIN TAPS AND PAVEMENT RESTORATION   ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARD DETAIL P-4. IF P-4 IS   GOING TO BE USED, ADD TO PLAN.   -CANNOT FIND NUMERICAL PROPERTY ADDRESS ON PLAN. PLEASE   ADD BEFORE FINAL COPY.     Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-05-2019 Cont ID   Sent By rrossano Date 12-05-2019 Time   Rev Time 4.00 Received By rrossano Date 12-05-2019 Time   Sent To   Notes 2019-12-05 12:18:33 PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED   DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM AND PEAK)   AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PER FAC   64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER.       PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND STORM   DRAINAGE LINES ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE.       PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY OF   WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT   OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF YOUR   PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE   MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL   IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT   [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER   ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION   ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD   SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.       AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH   CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,   STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR   MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:   HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI   CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL       PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF   ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES,   INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND   SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES,   METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE   SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING   GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS,   ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL   INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER   LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE   PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN   VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.   ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND   PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER   OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &   TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE   RIGHT-OF-WAY.       PLEASE CLEARLY SHOW CITY RIGHTS OF WAY.       PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL UTILITY   CROSSINGS.       SHOW VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION INFORMATION   (NAVD 88 AND NGVD 29).       CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY   ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY   RIGHT OF WAY.       PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE   DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB   DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION).       PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND   IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED   AREAS.       PROVIDE UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY   PERSONNEL TO PROPOSED UTILITIES INCLUDING WATER METERS.       PLEASE PROVIDE CCTV OF UPSTREAM SANITARY LINES TO   NORTH, SOUTH AND WEST.       MANHOLE ON ROSEMARY AVE. WILL REQUIRE REHAB.       PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR   PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.       PROVIDE ENLARGED DETAIL ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION   OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION.       FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SHOW ALL ADJACENT   ADDRESSES AND SANITARY LATERALS TO BE AFFECTED BY NEW   SERVICE BEING INSTALLED ALONG 2ND ST.       THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE PER MARK HURLEY, PUBLIC   UTILITIES CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, 561-822-2262   [email protected]       -EXISTING WATER SERVICES NOT SHOWN ? SHOULD BE SHOWN   AND LABELED ON PLAN ALONG WITH WHAT HAPPENING TO THEM.       -NEW WATER SERVICES ON 2ND ST ARE CROSSING OTHER   UTILITIES. EACH CROSSING SHOULD BE LABELED WITH HOW   CONFLICT IS RESOLVED.       -DOMESTIC METER SHOULD BE INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND AND   LABELED AS SUCH ON PLAN. WOULD NEED U.E. AROUND IT.   LOCATION AREA LOOKS THIN -> NOT SURE IF WOULD HAVE   ENOUGH ROOM FOR IT -> NO PART OF IT INCLUDING BYPASS   BOXES/LIDS SHOULD BE IN A SIDEWALK. ASSOCIATED BACKFLOW   ASSEMBLY CANNOT BE INSTALLED ACROSS DRIVEWAY AND INSIDE   BUILDING -> NEEDS TO BE IMMEDIATELY   ADJACENT AFTER THE METERED WATER SERVICE ON PRIVATE   PROPERTY AND NOT IN ANY ROW OR UE. CUSTOMER SHOULD   CONSIDER PARALLEL BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES TO MINIMIZE WATER   OUTAGES DURING BACKFLOW MAINTENANCE.       -DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE LOOKS LIKE WILL CAUSE ACCIDENTS OR   TRAFFIC CONFUSION. IT?S ONE WAY STREET GOING EAST, BUT   DRIVERS TURNING INTO DRIVEWAY MUST CROSS OUTGOING   DRIVERS IN CONFLICT. COULD SOMETHING BE DONE TO   MINIMIZE THAT CONFLICT?       -FIRE DCDA SHOULD NOT BE LOCATED IN BUILDING UNLESS   FIRE DEPT. REQUIRES IT INSIDE BUILDING. IF REQUIRED TO   BE INSIDE BUILDING, PROPERTY OWNER WOULD HAVE TO SUBMIT   BACKFLOW COVENANT.       -PROPOSED SS ON 2ND ST. LOOKS LIKE CLOSER THAN 10? FROM   EXISTING WATER MAIN -> UNDERSTAND THIS SHOULD BE AT   LEAST 10? DISTANCE. CROSSINGS WITH EXISTING WATER MAINS   AND WATER SERVICES ARE NOT SHOWN AND LABELED WITH HOW   RESOLVED.       -EXISTING WATER SERVICES FEEDING SOUTH SIDE OF 2ND ST   FROM THE 6? WATER MAIN ARE NOT SHOWN AND LABELED. SHOW   ALL OTHERS IN PROJECT AREA AS WELL.       -PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTS.       -E-W ALLEY LOOKS LIKE CITY ROW -> NOT SURE IF CUSTOMER   GOT APPROVAL TO ELIMINATE ALLEY.       -SAW HISTORIC PICTURE OF LARGE TREE IN VICINITY OF NEW   WATER SERVICES. IF TREE STILL THERE, TREE SHOULD BE   RELOCATED OR WATER SERVICES POSITIONED FAR AWAY FROM   IT.       -OUR GIS SHOWS 30? EXISTING WATER MAIN REDUCING DOWN TO   24? NEAR SAPODILLA. IF THAT IS CORRECT SHOULD BE SHOWN   ON PLAN.       -PLAN IS MISSING THE WATER DEMAND CALCULATIONS CHART.       -PLAN SHOULD HAVE SEPARATE ENLARGED PLAN SECTIONS JUST   FOR THE NEW LARGE METERED WATER SERVICES SHOWING DETAIL   OF HOW CONSTRUCTED.       FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR   CONCERNS, THANKS.       RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT   401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR   WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX   3366, ZIP 33402)   MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 FAX:   (561) 494-1116 MOBILE: (561) 246-9525   EMAIL: [email protected] WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING       MANNY GONZALEZ, SENIOR ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT   401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR   WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX   3366, ZIP 33402)   MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 DIRECT: (561) 494-1085   FAX: (561) 494-1116 MOBILE: (561) 644-7301 EMAIL:   [email protected] WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING         Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT Rev No 2 Status P Date 10-08-2020 Cont ID   Sent By pleduc Date 10-08-2020 Time 12:44 Rev Time 0.00 Received By pleduc Date 10-08-2020 Time 12:44 Sent To   Notes 2020-10-08 12:49:15 AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE LETTER REGARDING   THE GRAND FROM SHUTTS TO ANA MARIA APONTE, URBAN DESIGN   PLANNER, DATED SEPTEMBER 28, 2020,WITH THE ATTACHED   DRAWING DOCUMENTS, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE   PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN   ADDRESSED.       HOWEVER, THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED   PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR   APPROVAL.       THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT   THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE   REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.       PETER LEDUC   FIRE MARSHAL   WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE   561-804-4709     Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT Rev No 1 Status P Date 12-06-2019 Cont ID   Sent By pleduc Date 12-06-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By pleduc Date 12-06-2019 Time 15:47 Sent To   Notes 2019-12-06 15:55:46 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,   FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM   BEACH FIRE RESCUE.       THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE   DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS   ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.       THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE   PROPOSED PROJECT.       1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY   WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE   PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A   PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED   TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN   STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY   MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER   PROTECTION.       2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY   IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING   ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.       3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM   ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.   ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND   AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT   WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.       4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE   REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE   ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.       5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH   THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,   INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.       6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,   PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,   INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE   OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)       7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA   14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS   STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE   BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE   BEING CONSTRUCTED.       SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED,   REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU   PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.       IT IS RECOMMENDED FOR APARTMENT BUILDINGS OF THIS SIZE   TO HAVE TWO SEPARATE FDC LOCATIONS REMOTELY LOCATED.       7A. PER NFPA 14   6.4.5.4* FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED   NOT MORE THAN 100 FT (30.5 M) FROM THE NEAREST FIRE   HYDRANT CONNECTED TO AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY.       7B. PLEASE REVIEW THE DISTANCE SEPARATION OF THE   STAIRWELLS AS THE SEPARATION DISTANCE IS NOT INDICATED.       7.3.2.2* WHERE THE MOST REMOTE PORTION OF A   NON-SPRINKLERED FLOOR OR STORY IS LOCATED IN EXCESS OF   150 FT (45.7 M) OF TRAVEL DISTANCE FROM A HOSE   CONNECTION IN OR ADJACENT TO A REQUIRED EXIT OR THE   MOST REMOTE PORTION OF A SPRINKLERED FLOOR OR STORY   IS LOCATED IN EXCESS OF 200 FT (61 M) OF TRAVEL   DISTANCE FROM A HOSE CONNECTION IN OR ADJACENT TO A   REQUIRED EXIT, ADDITIONAL HOSE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE   PROVIDED, IN APPROVED LOCATIONS, WHERE REQUIRED BY THE   LOCAL FIRE DEPARTMENT OR THE AHJ.       7C. PER NFPA 1       18.3 WATER SUPPLIES.   18.3.1* AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING   THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE   PROVIDED TO ALL PREMISES UPON WHICH FACILITIES,   BUILDINGS, OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS ARE HEREAFTER   CONSTRUCTED OR MOVED INTO THE JURISDICTION. THE   APPROVED WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH   SECTION 18.4.       PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004,   FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE   POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF   APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT,   CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR   AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER   SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA)   AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS   PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS.   FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE   PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?       7D. THE LOCATION OF THE DDCV FIRE LINE LOCATION SHALL   MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE   COORDINATED WITH THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S   ENGINEERS OFFICE, THE LANSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S   PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE.       8. A CLASS ?A? NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM   SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP   DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND   APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY   INSTALLATION.       9. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7   KEYWAY SYSTEM.       ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S   EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA   B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.       ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN   WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL   LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET   MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER   ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN   AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE   IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.       10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL   BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL   DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,   EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A   PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE   SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.       11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS   DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED   ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF   FIRE PREVENTION.       ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS   DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE   BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND   FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET   OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER   ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES.       12. RADIO       NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY   RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.       11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM   RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT   COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL   DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.       NFPA 72, 24.5.2* TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS   ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS.   24.5.2.2 RADIO COVERAGE. RADIO COVERAGE SHALL BE   PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE BUILDING AS A PERCENTAGE OF   FLOOR AREA AS SPECIFIED IN 24.5.2.2.1 THROUGH   24.5.2.2.3.   24.5.2.2.1 CRITICAL AREAS. CRITICAL AREAS, SUCH AS THE   EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER(S), THE FIRE PUMP ROOM(S),   EXIT STAIRS, EXIT PASSAGEWAYS, ELEVATOR LOBBIES,   STANDPIPE CABINETS, SPRINKLER SECTIONAL VALVE   LOCATIONS, AND OTHER AREAS DEEMED CRITICAL BY THE   AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH   99 PERCENT FLOOR AREA RADIO COVERAGE.   24.5.2.2.2 GENERAL BUILDING AREAS. GENERAL BUILDING   AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH 90 PERCENT FLOOR AREA   RADIO COVERAGE.   24.5.2.3 SIGNAL STRENGTH.   24.5.2.3.1 INBOUND. A MINIMUM INBOUND SIGNAL STRENGTH   OF -95 DBM, OR OTHER SIGNAL STRENGTH AS REQUIRED BY THE   AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL BE PROVIDED   THROUGHOUT THE COVERAGE AREA.   24.5.2.3.2 OUTBOUND. A MINIMUM OUTBOUND SIGNAL STRENGTH   OF -95 DBM AT THE DONOR SITE, OR OTHER SIGNAL STRENGTH   AS REQUIRED BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL   BE PROVIDED FROM THE COVERAGE AREA.       THE SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL   STRENGTH OF -95 DBM FOR THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST   PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE. TESTING SHALL BE BY AN   ACCEPTABLE NATIONAL STANDARD DOCUMENTING PERCENTAGES   NOTED ABOVE AND BY ACTUAL RADIO TESTING BY FIRE   PERSONNEL. IF THE MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A   BI-DIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH   A MINIMUM 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP.       13. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS   BUILDING.       ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS,   PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.       14. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT   DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.       15. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING   PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH   THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.       PETER LEDUC   FIRE MARSHAL   561-804-4709   [email protected]     Review Stop HIST HISTORICAL Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-03-2019 Cont ID   Sent By fmittner Date 12-03-2019 Time 13:28 Rev Time 0.00 Received By fmittner Date 12-03-2019 Time 13:27 Sent To   Notes 2019-12-03 13:27:01 3 PARCELS OF PROPOSED PROJECT FALL WITHIN THE NORTHWEST   HISTORIC DISTRICT (LR AND NR)       NO WEST ELEVATION PROVIDED, NOT ABLE TO EVALUATE.       PROJECT WILL NEED COMP PLAN AND ZONING CHANGES TO   COMPLY, ONCE THAT IS AFFECTUATED, THE FOLLOWING SHALL   BE MODIFIED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE HISTORIC DISTRICT   LDR'S, DESIGN GUIDELINES AND SOIS:       1. DOG PARK PARCEL - IDENTIFY FENCING MATERIAL AND   HEIGHT. ALUMINUM PREFERRED, IF USING CHAIN LINK SHALL   BE FULLY SCREENED FROM VIEW WITH LANDSCAPING.   2. 3-STORY BUILDING, WESTERN 2 PARCELS. REMOVE THIRD   FLOOR UNIT B-1 TO BRING WESTERN PORTION INTO HEIGHT   COMPATIBILITY WITH TWO STORY MULTI-FAMILY AT CORNER.   MODIFY PARAPET AT THAT CORNER TO BE FLUSH WITH ROOFLINE   NOT PROJECTING UP AT CORNER AS IS CURRENTLY INDICATED.   B-1 UNITS ON LEVEL 1 AND 2 SHALL FEATURE CORNER WINDOWS   IN ALUMINUM MILL FINISH FRAMES TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH   EXISTING STRUCTURE ON CORNER. B-1 UNITS ON LEVEL 1 AND   2 SHALL FEATURE PAINTED STAGGERED BRICK OR BREEZEBLOCKS   FOR BALCONY RAILINGS/ENCLOSURES TO RELATE WITH   ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES OF HISTORIC DISTRICT.       NEW CONSTRUCION OF COMPONENTS OF PROJECT WITHIN   HISTORIC DISTRICT REQUIRES SUBMITTAL OF A COA AND   APPROVAL BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD.       QUESTIONS, CONTACT: FRIEDERIKE MITTNER, CITY HISTORIC   PRESERVATION PLANNER AT (561) 822-1457 OR   [email protected] Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 4 Status P Date 04-14-2021 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 04-14-2021 Time 16:09 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 04-14-2021 Time 16:09 Sent To   Notes 2021-04-14 16:11:01 FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER   561-822-1462   PROJECT: THE GRAND Z19110020   APRIL 14, 2021   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:       1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE   DISPOSITION PLAN:   ? SATISFIED. TREES AND PALMS CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE TO   BE MITIGATED BASED ON CATEGORY. ANY TREES 20 FEET OR   MORE CANOPY DIAMETER TO BE MITIGATED BY ACTUAL SQUARE   FOOTAGE. 1:1 MITIGATION IS EQUAL TO THE CATEGORY VALUE.   MANGO CATEGORY 1 EQUALS 300 SQ FT, SABAL PALM CATEGORY   3 EQUALS 100 SQ FT.   THERE ARE MULTIPLE TREES THAT ARE 20 FEET OR MORE   CANOPY DIAMETER THAT DO NOT SHOW THE ACTUAL SQUARE   FOOTAGE OF CANOPY THAT MUST BE MITIGATED. #1, 2, 3, 13,   17, 30, 36, 38, 74, 77, 95, 108, 110. REVISE.   #52 AND 64 FICUS NITIDA, #94 SAPODILLA ARE NOT LISTED   AS PROHIBITED INVASIVE IN WPB CODE. MUST BE MITIGATED.   ? SATISFIED. INCLUDE EXISTING STREET TREES TO BE   REMOVED AND REPLACED ON ROSEMARY AVE.   ? SATISFIED. REVISE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF   MITIGATION FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE   REMOVED AFTER MAKING CORRECTIONS.   ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION VALUES BY CATEGORY   FOR THE PROPOSED TREES AND PALMS.   SILVER BUTTONWOOD IS CATEGORY 2, FOR 150 SQ FT CREDIT.       2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE   TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR   RELOCATED. DESCRIBE THE METHODOLOGY USED TO DETERMINE   CONDITION. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY   EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR   POOR. THERE APPEAR TO BE SEVERAL SABAL PALMS THAT ARE   IN GOOD CONDITION THAT CAN BE RELOCATED.       3. SATISFIED. THE STREETSCAPE CAN BE IMPROVED TO   ACCOMPLISH THE INTENT OF THE CODE SECTION 94-113. THE   PALMS MAY BE USED, BUT NOT AS COUNTING TOWARD THE TREE   REQUIREMENT AT THE MAXIMUM 30 FOOT SPACING. ADD CANOPY   TREES AS REQUIRED. TREE GRATES ARE NOT PREFERRED IF THE   SIDEWALK MEETS THE MINIMUM 8 FOOT WIDTH REQUIREMENT,   AND PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE USED INSTEAD. BANYAN   STREETSCAPE NEEDS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY   CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT.           4. SATISFIED. CALCULATIONS FOR NUMBER OF REQUIRED   STREET TREES NEED TO BE PROVIDED. TOTAL LENGTH OF   STREETSCAPE FROM ONE PROPERTY LINE TO THE OTHER END,   DIVIDE BY 30, THEN INDICATE THE NUMBER OF TREES   REQUIRED AND PROVIDED, ROUNDING UP FOR ANY PORTION   LEFT.   PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR EACH   PROPERTY LINE LENGTH ADJACENT TO A STREET, THE REQUIRED   NUMBER OF TREES AND THE NUMBER PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE   PROPERTY LINE LENGTH FOR THE BUFFER REQUIREMENT ON THE   WEST SIDE NOT ADJACENT TO A STREET AND PROVIDE THE   NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED AND PROVIDED.       5. REGULATIONS HAVE CHANGED INVALIDATING THIS COMMENT.   REQUIRED OPEN SPACE TYPES AND SQUARE FOOTAGE CANNOT BE   DETERMINED AT THIS TIME, AS THERE IS NOT ONE CONSISTENT   ZONING DESIGNATION FOR ALL THE PARCELS INCLUDED IN THE   PROPOSED PROJECT.       6. SATISFIED. FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN OPTIONS POINTS   CANNOT BE COUNTED MORE THAN ONCE IN EACH CATEGORY FOR   THE SAME PLANTS. EXAMPLE: IF 51% TREES CLAIMED AS   NATIVE, THE REMAINDER CAN ONLY BE COUNTED TOWARD   DROUGHT TOLERANT FOR 25-50%.       7. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF UTILITY   LINES ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, ALSO LOCATIONS OF VALVES AND   BACKFLOW PREVENTERS AND FPL TRANSFORMERS. SCREENING   MUST BE PROVIDED.   ADJUST LOCATIONS ON LANDSCAPE PLANS TO MATCH CIVIL   DRAWINGS. FDC IS SHOWN IN CONFLICT WITH THE SIDEWALK.   GAS AND WATER MAIN ON 2ND ST ARE IN CONFLICT WITH THE   STREET TREE LOCATIONS, PROVIDE INFORMATION ON HOW THIS   WILL BE RESOLVED.   MEETING FROM 12/14 REGARDING UTILITIES AND TREE   CONFLICTS RESULTED IN SOME POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS. SUBMIT   REVISED PLANS.   PLANS WERE NOT UPDATED.       8. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF REQUIRED STRUCTURAL   SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE ADJACENT TO STREET TREES. PROVIDE   A TYPICAL FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE STRUCTURAL SOIL   AND A SEPARATE PLAN SHOWING THE LOCATIONS. AREA FOR   STRUCTURAL SOIL AND PLANTING AREA SHOULD BE   APPROXIMATELY 14 FEET IN LENGTH AND 9 FEET IN WIDTH   RELATIVE TO THE BACK OF CURB. STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL IS   TO SHOW THE CONSTRUCTION CROSS SECTION FOR DEPTH OF 36   INCHES, AND PLANTING SOIL IN THE PLANTING AREA.       9. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.   PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT   MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT   TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE   LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH   FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH   FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.   PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF DROUGHT TOLERANT AND   NATIVE SPECIES ADDED BASED ON THE PROPOSED PLANT LIST.   2418/4814 IS 50% AND DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENT.   CHANGE SOME SPECIES TO NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT TO   ACHIEVE THE MINIMUM 60%. GREEN ISLAND FICUS IS ACCEPTED   AS LOW WATER USAGE.       ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/20/20:       10. SATISFIED. REMOVE GRAVEL FROM PLAN SHOWN ON WEST   SIDE OF BUILDING. UNLESS IT IS GROUNDCOVER OR GRASS,   PLANTING AREAS ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE 3 INCHES OF   COMPACTED ORGANIC, NON-CYPRESS MULCH PER SECTION   94-446(1)D.       11. SATISFIED. SHEET A0.3 NEEDS TO IDENTIFY THE   PRIVATE OPEN SPACE TYPE AND PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS   FOR THE REQUIREMENTS AS FOUND IN SECTION 94-109 TABLE   IV-7 FOR VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY PER TABLE IV-8.   THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOULD ALSO INCLUDE THE SAME   INFORMATION.       12. SATISFIED. ADD THE RELOCATED SABAL PALMS TO THE   PLANT LIST.       13. SATISFIED. STREET TREE SIZE REQUIREMENT IS 20 FEET   HEIGHT, FLORIDA GRADE #1 OR BETTER PER SECTION 94-113.   MAGNOLIA WILL NOT WORK TO MEET THE CANOPY REQUIREMENT   FOR REQUIRED STREET TREE. THE ARRANGEMENT WITH THE LIVE   OAKS CLOSER TO THE BUILDING AND GUMBO LIMBO IN THE   STREET BULB OUTS IS ACCEPTABLE. THE CONCERN IS THAT THE   GUMBO LIMBOS WILL TAKE SOME PRUNING MAINTENANCE TO MAKE   SURE THE BRANCHES DEVELOP ABOVE THE 14 FOOT CLEARANCE   NEEDED FOR THE TRAVEL LANE AND 8 FOOT CLEARANCE NEEDED   FOR THE SIDEWALK.       ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 12/14/20:           14. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. WEST BUFFER TREES CANNOT COUNT   OFFSITE EXISTING TREES. SEE COMMENT #15. CALCULATIONS   FOR THE ENTIRE BUFFER LENGTH NEED TO BE USED TO   DETERMINE THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED TREES. 12 PALMS   PROVIDED EQUAL 4 TREES, THE 2 MAHOGANY TREES MAY BE   COUNTED, SO CURRENTLY 6 TREES ARE PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE   CALCULATION AND ADD TREES OR PALMS AS NEEDED.   TOTAL PER THE SURVEY IS 70? + 57.5? +127.5 = 255 FEET.   9 TREES ARE NEEDED.       15. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. OFFSITE TREES #15 AND #17   NEED TO BE EVALUATED BY A CERTIFIED ARBORIST FOR THE   REDUCTION IN CANOPY AND ROOT SYSTEM THAT WILL BE   REQUIRED TO CONSTRUCT THE BUILDING TO ASSURE THEY WILL   NOT DESTABILIZE OR CAUSE DECLINE IN THE TREES. THE   OWNERSHIP OF THE TREES ALSO NEEDS TO BE DETERMINED   RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE.       ARBORIST REPORT WAS NOT SUBMITTED WITH THE 3/22/21   RESUBMITTAL. THIS COMMENT NEEDS TO BE RESOLVED PRIOR TO   ISSUING THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT FOR MITIGATION   PURPOSES AND TO ADD REQUIRED TREES TO THE BUFFER.       16. SATISFIED. STREET TREE REQUIREMENTS APPLY FOR THE N   SAPODILLA PROPERTY LINE LENGTH FOR 2 STREET TREES, BUT   THEY NEED TO BE IN THE RIGHT OF WAY.       17. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. THERE IS TREE CANOPY   MITIGATION DUE OF 8072 SQ FT. INDICATE IF THIS WILL BE   ADDRESSED THROUGH PAYMENT IN LIEU OF $13453.00.       ADDITIONAL MITIGATION WILL BE REQUIRED IF #15 AND #17   ARE REMOVED. MITIGATION WILL BE PROVIDED WITH   ADDITIONAL TREES PER COMMENT #14.   NOTE THAT THE 3/22/21 SUBMITTAL CONTAINED THE SAME   LANDSCAPE AND TREE MITIGATION PLANS FROM 12/23/20.   PLEASE SUBMIT UPDATED PLANS.       CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.   2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE   STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND   IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.   3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF   WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A   SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 3 Status F Date 12-14-2020 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 12-14-2020 Time 16:12 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 12-14-2020 Time 16:12 Sent To   Notes 2020-12-14 16:23:43 FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER   561-822-1462   PROJECT: THE GRAND Z19110020   DECEMBER 14, 2020   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:       1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE   DISPOSITION PLAN:   ? SATISFIED. TREES AND PALMS CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE TO   BE MITIGATED BASED ON CATEGORY. ANY TREES 20 FEET OR   MORE CANOPY DIAMETER TO BE MITIGATED BY ACTUAL SQUARE   FOOTAGE. 1:1 MITIGATION IS EQUAL TO THE CATEGORY VALUE.   MANGO CATEGORY 1 EQUALS 300 SQ FT, SABAL PALM CATEGORY   3 EQUALS 100 SQ FT.   THERE ARE MULTIPLE TREES THAT ARE 20 FEET OR MORE   CANOPY DIAMETER THAT DO NOT SHOW THE ACTUAL SQUARE   FOOTAGE OF CANOPY THAT MUST BE MITIGATED. #1, 2, 3, 13,   17, 30, 36, 38, 74, 77, 95, 108, 110. REVISE.   #52 AND 64 FICUS NITIDA, #94 SAPODILLA ARE NOT LISTED   AS PROHIBITED INVASIVE IN WPB CODE. MUST BE MITIGATED.   ? SATISFIED. INCLUDE EXISTING STREET TREES TO BE   REMOVED AND REPLACED ON ROSEMARY AVE.   ? SATISFIED. REVISE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF   MITIGATION FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE   REMOVED AFTER MAKING CORRECTIONS.   ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION VALUES BY CATEGORY   FOR THE PROPOSED TREES AND PALMS.   SILVER BUTTONWOOD IS CATEGORY 2, FOR 150 SQ FT CREDIT.       2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE   TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR   RELOCATED. DESCRIBE THE METHODOLOGY USED TO DETERMINE   CONDITION. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY   EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR   POOR. THERE APPEAR TO BE SEVERAL SABAL PALMS THAT ARE   IN GOOD CONDITION THAT CAN BE RELOCATED.       3. SATISFIED. THE STREETSCAPE CAN BE IMPROVED TO   ACCOMPLISH THE INTENT OF THE CODE SECTION 94-113. THE   PALMS MAY BE USED, BUT NOT AS COUNTING TOWARD THE TREE   REQUIREMENT AT THE MAXIMUM 30 FOOT SPACING. ADD CANOPY   TREES AS REQUIRED. TREE GRATES ARE NOT PREFERRED IF THE   SIDEWALK MEETS THE MINIMUM 8 FOOT WIDTH REQUIREMENT,   AND PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE USED INSTEAD. BANYAN   STREETSCAPE NEEDS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY   CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT.           4. SATISFIED. CALCULATIONS FOR NUMBER OF REQUIRED   STREET TREES NEED TO BE PROVIDED. TOTAL LENGTH OF   STREETSCAPE FROM ONE PROPERTY LINE TO THE OTHER END,   DIVIDE BY 30, THEN INDICATE THE NUMBER OF TREES   REQUIRED AND PROVIDED, ROUNDING UP FOR ANY PORTION   LEFT.   PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR EACH   PROPERTY LINE LENGTH ADJACENT TO A STREET, THE REQUIRED   NUMBER OF TREES AND THE NUMBER PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE   PROPERTY LINE LENGTH FOR THE BUFFER REQUIREMENT ON THE   WEST SIDE NOT ADJACENT TO A STREET AND PROVIDE THE   NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED AND PROVIDED.       5. REGULATIONS HAVE CHANGED INVALIDATING THIS COMMENT.   REQUIRED OPEN SPACE TYPES AND SQUARE FOOTAGE CANNOT BE   DETERMINED AT THIS TIME, AS THERE IS NOT ONE CONSISTENT   ZONING DESIGNATION FOR ALL THE PARCELS INCLUDED IN THE   PROPOSED PROJECT.       6. SATISFIED. FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN OPTIONS POINTS   CANNOT BE COUNTED MORE THAN ONCE IN EACH CATEGORY FOR   THE SAME PLANTS. EXAMPLE: IF 51% TREES CLAIMED AS   NATIVE, THE REMAINDER CAN ONLY BE COUNTED TOWARD   DROUGHT TOLERANT FOR 25-50%.       7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES   ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, ALSO LOCATIONS OF VALVES AND   BACKFLOW PREVENTERS AND FPL TRANSFORMERS. SCREENING   MUST BE PROVIDED.   ADJUST LOCATIONS ON LANDSCAPE PLANS TO MATCH CIVIL   DRAWINGS. FDC IS SHOWN IN CONFLICT WITH THE SIDEWALK.   GAS AND WATER MAIN ON 2ND ST ARE IN CONFLICT WITH THE   STREET TREE LOCATIONS, PROVIDE INFORMATION ON HOW THIS   WILL BE RESOLVED.   MEETING FROM 12/14 REGARDING UTILITIES AND TREE   CONFLICTS RESULTED IN SOME POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS. SUBMIT   REVISED PLANS.       8. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF REQUIRED STRUCTURAL   SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE ADJACENT TO STREET TREES. PROVIDE   A TYPICAL FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE STRUCTURAL SOIL   AND A SEPARATE PLAN SHOWING THE LOCATIONS. AREA FOR   STRUCTURAL SOIL AND PLANTING AREA SHOULD BE   APPROXIMATELY 14 FEET IN LENGTH AND 9 FEET IN WIDTH   RELATIVE TO THE BACK OF CURB. STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL IS   TO SHOW THE CONSTRUCTION CROSS SECTION FOR DEPTH OF 36   INCHES, AND PLANTING SOIL IN THE PLANTING AREA.       9. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.   PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT   MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT   TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE   LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH   FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH   FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.   PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF DROUGHT TOLERANT AND   NATIVE SPECIES ADDED BASED ON THE PROPOSED PLANT LIST.   2418/4814 IS 50% AND DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENT.   CHANGE SOME SPECIES TO NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT TO   ACHIEVE THE MINIMUM 60%. GREEN ISLAND FICUS IS ACCEPTED   AS LOW WATER USAGE.       ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/20/20:       10. SATISFIED. REMOVE GRAVEL FROM PLAN SHOWN ON WEST   SIDE OF BUILDING. UNLESS IT IS GROUNDCOVER OR GRASS,   PLANTING AREAS ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE 3 INCHES OF   COMPACTED ORGANIC, NON-CYPRESS MULCH PER SECTION   94-446(1)D.       11. SATISFIED. SHEET A0.3 NEEDS TO IDENTIFY THE   PRIVATE OPEN SPACE TYPE AND PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS   FOR THE REQUIREMENTS AS FOUND IN SECTION 94-109 TABLE   IV-7 FOR VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY PER TABLE IV-8.   THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOULD ALSO INCLUDE THE SAME   INFORMATION.       12. SATISFIED. ADD THE RELOCATED SABAL PALMS TO THE   PLANT LIST.       13. SATISFIED. STREET TREE SIZE REQUIREMENT IS 20 FEET   HEIGHT, FLORIDA GRADE #1 OR BETTER PER SECTION 94-113.   MAGNOLIA WILL NOT WORK TO MEET THE CANOPY REQUIREMENT   FOR REQUIRED STREET TREE. THE ARRANGEMENT WITH THE LIVE   OAKS CLOSER TO THE BUILDING AND GUMBO LIMBO IN THE   STREET BULB OUTS IS ACCEPTABLE. THE CONCERN IS THAT THE   GUMBO LIMBOS WILL TAKE SOME PRUNING MAINTENANCE TO MAKE   SURE THE BRANCHES DEVELOP ABOVE THE 14 FOOT CLEARANCE   NEEDED FOR THE TRAVEL LANE AND 8 FOOT CLEARANCE NEEDED   FOR THE SIDEWALK.       ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 12/14/20:           14. WEST BUFFER TREES CANNOT COUNT OFFSITE EXISTING   TREES. SEE COMMENT #15. CALCULATIONS FOR THE ENTIRE   BUFFER LENGTH NEED TO BE USED TO DETERMINE THE NUMBER   OF REQUIRED TREES. 12 PALMS PROVIDED EQUAL 4 TREES, THE   2 MAHOGANY TREES MAY BE COUNTED, SO CURRENTLY 6 TREES   ARE PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE CALCULATION AND ADD TREES OR   PALMS AS NEEDED.       15. OFFSITE TREES #15 AND #17 NEED TO BE EVALUATED BY A   CERTIFIED ARBORIST FOR THE REDUCTION IN CANOPY AND ROOT   SYSTEM THAT WILL BE REQUIRED TO CONSTRUCT THE BUILDING   TO ASSURE THEY WILL NOT DESTABILIZE OR CAUSE DECLINE IN   THE TREES. THE OWNERSHIP OF THE TREES ALSO NEEDS TO BE   DETERMINED RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE.       16. STREET TREE REQUIREMENTS APPLY FOR THE N SAPODILLA   PROPERTY LINE LENGTH FOR 2 STREET TREES, BUT THEY NEED   TO BE IN THE RIGHT OF WAY.       17. THERE IS TREE CANOPY MITIGATION DUE OF 8072 SQ FT.   INDICATE IF THIS WILL BE ADDRESSED THROUGH PAYMENT IN   LIEU OF $13453.00.           CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.   2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE   STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND   IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.   3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF   WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A   SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-22-2020 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 10-22-2020 Time 11:19 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 10-22-2020 Time 11:19 Sent To   Notes 2020-10-22 11:19:48 FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER   561-822-1462   PROJECT: THE GRAND Z19110020   OCTOBER 22, 2020   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:       1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE   DISPOSITION PLAN:   ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. TREES AND PALMS CANOPY SQUARE   FOOTAGE TO BE MITIGATED BASED ON CATEGORY. ANY TREES 20   FEET OR MORE CANOPY DIAMETER TO BE MITIGATED BY ACTUAL   SQUARE FOOTAGE. 1:1 MITIGATION IS EQUAL TO THE CATEGORY   VALUE. MANGO CATEGORY 1 EQUALS 300 SQ FT, SABAL PALM   CATEGORY 3 EQUALS 100 SQ FT.   THERE ARE MULTIPLE TREES THAT ARE 20 FEET OR MORE   CANOPY DIAMETER THAT DO NOT SHOW THE ACTUAL SQUARE   FOOTAGE OF CANOPY THAT MUST BE MITIGATED. #1, 2, 3, 13,   17, 30, 36, 38, 74, 77, 95, 108, 110. REVISE.   #52 AND 64 FICUS NITIDA, #94 SAPODILLA ARE NOT LISTED   AS PROHIBITED INVASIVE IN WPB CODE. MUST BE MITIGATED.   ? SATISFIED. INCLUDE EXISTING STREET TREES TO BE   REMOVED AND REPLACED ON ROSEMARY AVE.   ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. REVISE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE   OF MITIGATION FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE   REMOVED AFTER MAKING CORRECTIONS.   ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION VALUES BY   CATEGORY FOR THE PROPOSED TREES AND PALMS.   SILVER BUTTONWOOD IS CATEGORY 2, FOR 150 SQ FT CREDIT.       2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE   TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR   RELOCATED. DESCRIBE THE METHODOLOGY USED TO DETERMINE   CONDITION. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY   EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR   POOR. THERE APPEAR TO BE SEVERAL SABAL PALMS THAT ARE   IN GOOD CONDITION THAT CAN BE RELOCATED.       3. SATISFIED. THE STREETSCAPE CAN BE IMPROVED TO   ACCOMPLISH THE INTENT OF THE CODE SECTION 94-113. THE   PALMS MAY BE USED, BUT NOT AS COUNTING TOWARD THE TREE   REQUIREMENT AT THE MAXIMUM 30 FOOT SPACING. ADD CANOPY   TREES AS REQUIRED. TREE GRATES ARE NOT PREFERRED IF THE   SIDEWALK MEETS THE MINIMUM 8 FOOT WIDTH REQUIREMENT,   AND PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE USED INSTEAD. BANYAN   STREETSCAPE NEEDS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY   CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT.           4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. CALCULATIONS FOR NUMBER OF   REQUIRED STREET TREES NEED TO BE PROVIDED. TOTAL LENGTH   OF STREETSCAPE FROM ONE PROPERTY LINE TO THE OTHER END,   DIVIDE BY 30, THEN INDICATE THE NUMBER OF TREES   REQUIRED AND PROVIDED, ROUNDING UP FOR ANY PORTION   LEFT.   PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR EACH   PROPERTY LINE LENGTH ADJACENT TO A STREET, THE REQUIRED   NUMBER OF TREES AND THE NUMBER PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE   PROPERTY LINE LENGTH FOR THE BUFFER REQUIREMENT ON THE   WEST SIDE NOT ADJACENT TO A STREET AND PROVIDE THE   NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED AND PROVIDED.       5. REGULATIONS HAVE CHANGED INVALIDATING THIS COMMENT.   REQUIRED OPEN SPACE TYPES AND SQUARE FOOTAGE CANNOT BE   DETERMINED AT THIS TIME, AS THERE IS NOT ONE CONSISTENT   ZONING DESIGNATION FOR ALL THE PARCELS INCLUDED IN THE   PROPOSED PROJECT.       6. SATISFIED. FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN OPTIONS POINTS   CANNOT BE COUNTED MORE THAN ONCE IN EACH CATEGORY FOR   THE SAME PLANTS. EXAMPLE: IF 51% TREES CLAIMED AS   NATIVE, THE REMAINDER CAN ONLY BE COUNTED TOWARD   DROUGHT TOLERANT FOR 25-50%.       7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES   ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, ALSO LOCATIONS OF VALVES AND   BACKFLOW PREVENTERS AND FPL TRANSFORMERS. SCREENING   MUST BE PROVIDED.   ADJUST LOCATIONS ON LANDSCAPE PLANS TO MATCH CIVIL   DRAWINGS. FDC IS SHOWN IN CONFLICT WITH THE SIDEWALK.   GAS AND WATER MAIN ON 2ND ST ARE IN CONFLICT WITH THE   STREET TREE LOCATIONS, PROVIDE INFORMATION ON HOW THIS   WILL BE RESOLVED.       8. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF REQUIRED STRUCTURAL   SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE ADJACENT TO STREET TREES. PROVIDE   A TYPICAL FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE STRUCTURAL SOIL   AND A SEPARATE PLAN SHOWING THE LOCATIONS. AREA FOR   STRUCTURAL SOIL AND PLANTING AREA SHOULD BE   APPROXIMATELY 14 FEET IN LENGTH AND 9 FEET IN WIDTH   RELATIVE TO THE BACK OF CURB. STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL IS   TO SHOW THE CONSTRUCTION CROSS SECTION FOR DEPTH OF 36   INCHES, AND PLANTING SOIL IN THE PLANTING AREA.       9. NOT SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445   L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT   MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT   TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE   LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH   FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH   FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.   PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF DROUGHT TOLERANT AND   NATIVE SPECIES ADDED BASED ON THE PROPOSED PLANT LIST.   2418/4814 IS 50% AND DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENT.   CHANGE SOME SPECIES TO NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT TO   ACHIEVE THE MINIMUM 60%. GREEN ISLAND FICUS IS ACCEPTED   AS LOW WATER USAGE.       ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/20/20:       10. REMOVE GRAVEL FROM PLAN SHOWN ON WEST SIDE OF   BUILDING. UNLESS IT IS GROUNDCOVER OR GRASS, PLANTING   AREAS ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE 3 INCHES OF COMPACTED   ORGANIC, NON-CYPRESS MULCH PER SECTION 94-446(1)D.       11. SHEET A0.3 NEEDS TO IDENTIFY THE PRIVATE OPEN   SPACE TYPE AND PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE   REQUIREMENTS AS FOUND IN SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-7 FOR   VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY PER TABLE IV-8. THE   LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOULD ALSO INCLUDE THE SAME   INFORMATION.       12. ADD THE RELOCATED SABAL PALMS TO THE PLANT LIST.       13. STREET TREE SIZE REQUIREMENT IS 20 FEET HEIGHT,   FLORIDA GRADE #1 OR BETTER PER SECTION 94-113. MAGNOLIA   WILL NOT WORK TO MEET THE CANOPY REQUIREMENT FOR   REQUIRED STREET TREE. THE ARRANGEMENT WITH THE LIVE   OAKS CLOSER TO THE BUILDING AND GUMBO LIMBO IN THE   STREET BULB OUTS IS ACCEPTABLE. THE CONCERN IS THAT THE   GUMBO LIMBOS WILL TAKE SOME PRUNING MAINTENANCE TO MAKE   SURE THE BRANCHES DEVELOP ABOVE THE 14 FOOT CLEARANCE   NEEDED FOR THE TRAVEL LANE AND 8 FOOT CLEARANCE NEEDED   FOR THE SIDEWALK.           CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.   2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE   STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND   IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.   3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF   WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A   SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-01-2021 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 04-01-2021 Time 12:59 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 04-01-2021 Time 12:59 Sent To   Notes 2021-04-01 13:01:11 FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER   561-822-1462   PROJECT: THE GRAND Z19110020   APRIL 1, 2021   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:       1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE   DISPOSITION PLAN:   ? SATISFIED. TREES AND PALMS CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE TO   BE MITIGATED BASED ON CATEGORY. ANY TREES 20 FEET OR   MORE CANOPY DIAMETER TO BE MITIGATED BY ACTUAL SQUARE   FOOTAGE. 1:1 MITIGATION IS EQUAL TO THE CATEGORY VALUE.   MANGO CATEGORY 1 EQUALS 300 SQ FT, SABAL PALM CATEGORY   3 EQUALS 100 SQ FT.   THERE ARE MULTIPLE TREES THAT ARE 20 FEET OR MORE   CANOPY DIAMETER THAT DO NOT SHOW THE ACTUAL SQUARE   FOOTAGE OF CANOPY THAT MUST BE MITIGATED. #1, 2, 3, 13,   17, 30, 36, 38, 74, 77, 95, 108, 110. REVISE.   #52 AND 64 FICUS NITIDA, #94 SAPODILLA ARE NOT LISTED   AS PROHIBITED INVASIVE IN WPB CODE. MUST BE MITIGATED.   ? SATISFIED. INCLUDE EXISTING STREET TREES TO BE   REMOVED AND REPLACED ON ROSEMARY AVE.   ? SATISFIED. REVISE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF   MITIGATION FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE   REMOVED AFTER MAKING CORRECTIONS.   ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION VALUES BY CATEGORY   FOR THE PROPOSED TREES AND PALMS.   SILVER BUTTONWOOD IS CATEGORY 2, FOR 150 SQ FT CREDIT.       2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE   TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR   RELOCATED. DESCRIBE THE METHODOLOGY USED TO DETERMINE   CONDITION. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY   EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR   POOR. THERE APPEAR TO BE SEVERAL SABAL PALMS THAT ARE   IN GOOD CONDITION THAT CAN BE RELOCATED.       3. SATISFIED. THE STREETSCAPE CAN BE IMPROVED TO   ACCOMPLISH THE INTENT OF THE CODE SECTION 94-113. THE   PALMS MAY BE USED, BUT NOT AS COUNTING TOWARD THE TREE   REQUIREMENT AT THE MAXIMUM 30 FOOT SPACING. ADD CANOPY   TREES AS REQUIRED. TREE GRATES ARE NOT PREFERRED IF THE   SIDEWALK MEETS THE MINIMUM 8 FOOT WIDTH REQUIREMENT,   AND PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE USED INSTEAD. BANYAN   STREETSCAPE NEEDS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY   CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT.           4. SATISFIED. CALCULATIONS FOR NUMBER OF REQUIRED   STREET TREES NEED TO BE PROVIDED. TOTAL LENGTH OF   STREETSCAPE FROM ONE PROPERTY LINE TO THE OTHER END,   DIVIDE BY 30, THEN INDICATE THE NUMBER OF TREES   REQUIRED AND PROVIDED, ROUNDING UP FOR ANY PORTION   LEFT.   PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR EACH   PROPERTY LINE LENGTH ADJACENT TO A STREET, THE REQUIRED   NUMBER OF TREES AND THE NUMBER PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE   PROPERTY LINE LENGTH FOR THE BUFFER REQUIREMENT ON THE   WEST SIDE NOT ADJACENT TO A STREET AND PROVIDE THE   NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED AND PROVIDED.       5. REGULATIONS HAVE CHANGED INVALIDATING THIS COMMENT.   REQUIRED OPEN SPACE TYPES AND SQUARE FOOTAGE CANNOT BE   DETERMINED AT THIS TIME, AS THERE IS NOT ONE CONSISTENT   ZONING DESIGNATION FOR ALL THE PARCELS INCLUDED IN THE   PROPOSED PROJECT.       6. SATISFIED. FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN OPTIONS POINTS   CANNOT BE COUNTED MORE THAN ONCE IN EACH CATEGORY FOR   THE SAME PLANTS. EXAMPLE: IF 51% TREES CLAIMED AS   NATIVE, THE REMAINDER CAN ONLY BE COUNTED TOWARD   DROUGHT TOLERANT FOR 25-50%.       7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES   ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, ALSO LOCATIONS OF VALVES AND   BACKFLOW PREVENTERS AND FPL TRANSFORMERS. SCREENING   MUST BE PROVIDED.   ADJUST LOCATIONS ON LANDSCAPE PLANS TO MATCH CIVIL   DRAWINGS. FDC IS SHOWN IN CONFLICT WITH THE SIDEWALK.   GAS AND WATER MAIN ON 2ND ST ARE IN CONFLICT WITH THE   STREET TREE LOCATIONS, PROVIDE INFORMATION ON HOW THIS   WILL BE RESOLVED.   MEETING FROM 12/14 REGARDING UTILITIES AND TREE   CONFLICTS RESULTED IN SOME POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS. SUBMIT   REVISED PLANS.   PLANS WERE NOT UPDATED.       8. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF REQUIRED STRUCTURAL   SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE ADJACENT TO STREET TREES. PROVIDE   A TYPICAL FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE STRUCTURAL SOIL   AND A SEPARATE PLAN SHOWING THE LOCATIONS. AREA FOR   STRUCTURAL SOIL AND PLANTING AREA SHOULD BE   APPROXIMATELY 14 FEET IN LENGTH AND 9 FEET IN WIDTH   RELATIVE TO THE BACK OF CURB. STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL IS   TO SHOW THE CONSTRUCTION CROSS SECTION FOR DEPTH OF 36   INCHES, AND PLANTING SOIL IN THE PLANTING AREA.       9. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.   PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT   MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT   TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE   LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH   FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH   FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.   PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF DROUGHT TOLERANT AND   NATIVE SPECIES ADDED BASED ON THE PROPOSED PLANT LIST.   2418/4814 IS 50% AND DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENT.   CHANGE SOME SPECIES TO NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT TO   ACHIEVE THE MINIMUM 60%. GREEN ISLAND FICUS IS ACCEPTED   AS LOW WATER USAGE.       ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/20/20:       10. SATISFIED. REMOVE GRAVEL FROM PLAN SHOWN ON WEST   SIDE OF BUILDING. UNLESS IT IS GROUNDCOVER OR GRASS,   PLANTING AREAS ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE 3 INCHES OF   COMPACTED ORGANIC, NON-CYPRESS MULCH PER SECTION   94-446(1)D.       11. SATISFIED. SHEET A0.3 NEEDS TO IDENTIFY THE   PRIVATE OPEN SPACE TYPE AND PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS   FOR THE REQUIREMENTS AS FOUND IN SECTION 94-109 TABLE   IV-7 FOR VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY PER TABLE IV-8.   THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOULD ALSO INCLUDE THE SAME   INFORMATION.       12. SATISFIED. ADD THE RELOCATED SABAL PALMS TO THE   PLANT LIST.       13. SATISFIED. STREET TREE SIZE REQUIREMENT IS 20 FEET   HEIGHT, FLORIDA GRADE #1 OR BETTER PER SECTION 94-113.   MAGNOLIA WILL NOT WORK TO MEET THE CANOPY REQUIREMENT   FOR REQUIRED STREET TREE. THE ARRANGEMENT WITH THE LIVE   OAKS CLOSER TO THE BUILDING AND GUMBO LIMBO IN THE   STREET BULB OUTS IS ACCEPTABLE. THE CONCERN IS THAT THE   GUMBO LIMBOS WILL TAKE SOME PRUNING MAINTENANCE TO MAKE   SURE THE BRANCHES DEVELOP ABOVE THE 14 FOOT CLEARANCE   NEEDED FOR THE TRAVEL LANE AND 8 FOOT CLEARANCE NEEDED   FOR THE SIDEWALK.       ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 12/14/20:           14. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. WEST BUFFER TREES CANNOT COUNT   OFFSITE EXISTING TREES. SEE COMMENT #15. CALCULATIONS   FOR THE ENTIRE BUFFER LENGTH NEED TO BE USED TO   DETERMINE THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED TREES. 12 PALMS   PROVIDED EQUAL 4 TREES, THE 2 MAHOGANY TREES MAY BE   COUNTED, SO CURRENTLY 6 TREES ARE PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE   CALCULATION AND ADD TREES OR PALMS AS NEEDED.   TOTAL PER THE SURVEY IS 70? + 57.5? +127.5 = 255 FEET.   9 TREES ARE NEEDED.       15. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. OFFSITE TREES #15 AND #17 NEED   TO BE EVALUATED BY A CERTIFIED ARBORIST FOR THE   REDUCTION IN CANOPY AND ROOT SYSTEM THAT WILL BE   REQUIRED TO CONSTRUCT THE BUILDING TO ASSURE THEY WILL   NOT DESTABILIZE OR CAUSE DECLINE IN THE TREES. THE   OWNERSHIP OF THE TREES ALSO NEEDS TO BE DETERMINED   RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE.       ARBORIST REPORT WAS NOT SUBMITTED WITH THE 3/22/21   RESUBMITTAL. THIS COMMENT NEEDS TO BE RESOLVED PRIOR TO   ISSUING THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT FOR MITIGATION   PURPOSES AND TO ADD REQUIRED TREES TO THE BUFFER.       16. SATISFIED. STREET TREE REQUIREMENTS APPLY FOR THE N   SAPODILLA PROPERTY LINE LENGTH FOR 2 STREET TREES, BUT   THEY NEED TO BE IN THE RIGHT OF WAY.       17. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THERE IS TREE CANOPY   MITIGATION DUE OF 8072 SQ FT. INDICATE IF THIS WILL BE   ADDRESSED THROUGH PAYMENT IN LIEU OF $13453.00.       ADDITIONAL MITIGATION WILL BE REQUIRED IF #15 AND #17   ARE REMOVED. MITIGATION WILL BE PROVIDED WITH   ADDITIONAL TREES PER COMMENT #14.   NOTE THAT THE 3/22/21 SUBMITTAL CONTAINED THE SAME   LANDSCAPE AND TREE MITIGATION PLANS FROM 12/23/20.   PLEASE SUBMIT UPDATED PLANS.       CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.   2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE   STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND   IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.   3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF   WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A   SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.     Review Stop PARK PARKING Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time   Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop POLICE POLICE Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time   Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS Rev No 2 Status P Date 10-05-2020 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 10-05-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date 10-05-2020 Time   Sent To   Notes 2020-10-05 09:00:21 NO FURTHER COMMENTS FROM PUBLIC WORKS.       MATT HEJAZI   DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS   [email protected]   561-822-2045 Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-10-2019 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 12-10-2019 Time   Rev Time   Received By   Date 12-10-2019 Time   Sent To   Notes 2019-12-10 13:18:50     PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:   - LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID   WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE AND TYPE OF   THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR) THAT WILL BE   UTILIZED THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION   SERVICE.   - AUTO TURN FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER   TRUCK   * TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT   * TRUCK WITH: 11 FT   * TURNING RADIUS:   - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT   - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT   - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT   - DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP AND   RECYCLING CONTAINERS.   - FOR A FREESTANDING SITE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, THE   ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST REVISION OF CITY   OF WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE   ENCLOSURE STANDARD, CG-8.           MATT HEJAZI   DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS   [email protected]   561-822-2045     Review Stop STORM STORMWATER Rev No 4 Status F Date 04-05-2021 Cont ID   Sent By tward Date 04-05-2021 Time 20:52 Rev Time 0.00 Received By tward Date 04-05-2021 Time 23:31 Sent To   Notes 2021-04-05 21:41:41 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE   3/22/2021 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE.       1. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] EXPLAIN WHY THE PROPOSED CURB   LINE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 2ND STREET AND   SAPODILLA AVE IS BEING MOVED INTO THE ROAD AND   NARROWING THE LANE WIDTH. PREVIOUS COMMENT:PROPOSED   NORTH CURB DOES NOT ALIGN WITH THE EXISTING CURB AT THE   WEST END OF 2ND STREET. THERE IS ALSO A GAP BETWEEN THE   START OF THE CURB AND THE BEGINNING OF THE WESTERN   PARALLEL PARKING AREA.       2. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] MOVE STRUCTURE S-105 WEST OR   EAST SO THAT IT IS NOT DIRECTLY SOUTH OF THE MID-BLOCK   CROSS WALK.PREVIOUS COMMENT: AVOID PLACEMENT OF   MANHOLES AND OTHER STRUCTURES WITHIN THE SIDEWALK. IF   UNAVOIDABLE, LOCATE THE STRUCTURES AWAY FROM CROSS   WALKS WHERE POSSIBLE.       3. [SATISFIED] DRAINAGE AND SANITARY SEWER PIPES AND   STRUCTURES TO BE LOCATED A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 3 FEET   (5 FEET PREFERRED) FROM WATER MAINS.       4. [NOT SATISFIED] SHOW 10' WIDE EASEMENT CENTERED OVER   THE STORM PIPE. PREVIOUS COMMENT: EASEMENT WILL NEED TO   BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY FOR THE STORM PIPE BETWEEN   S-204 AND THE EXISTING CATCH BASIN IF THE DESIGN DOES   NOT CHANGE.       5. [NOT SATISFIED] WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF STRUCTURE   S-201, A TYPE 'D' DBI IN THE PARKWAY OF 3RD STREET?       6. [SATISFIED] WILL CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS BE NEEDED TO   INSTALL THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY   BOUNDARY?       7. [NOT SATISFIED] COMMENT CAN BE ADDRESSED DURING   ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. VERIFY THE HGL BETWEEN   STRUCTURE CS-1 AND S-101 WILL NOT EXCEED THE RIM   ELEVATION OF S-101.       8. [SATISFIED] HOW WHERE THE CROSS SECTIONS PROVIDED ON   SHEET C3.1 ARE TAKEN. LABEL THE PARTICULAR STREET RIGHT   OF WAY ON EACH SECTION.       9. [NOT SATISFIED] COMMENT CAN BE ADDRESSED DURING   ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. ASSUMING SECTION A IS FOR   THE WEST PROPERTY LINE NORTH OF THE ALLEY, DIMENSION   THE HORIZONTAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE PROPERTY LINE AND   THE CENTER OF THE 18" STORM PIPE.       10. [NOT SATISFIED] COMMENT CAN BE ADDRESSED DURING   ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. ASSUMING SECTION B IS FOR   THE WEST PROPERTY LINE SOUTH OF THE ALLEY,DIMENSION THE   HORIZONTAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE PROPERTY LINE AND THE   CENTER OF THE 18" STORM PIPE.       11. [NOT SATISFIED] ASSUMING SECTION C IS FOR 2ND   STREET (30' R/W), CREATE A DEPRESSION BETWEEN THE BACK   OF CURB AND FRONT OF WALK TO CAPTURE THE STORMWATER   RUNOFF FORM THE SIDEWALK. SHOW WHERE THE EXISTING C&G   ON THE NORTH SIDE IS LOCATED IN RELATION TO THE NORTH   R/W LINE.       12. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE A SECTION OF 2ND STREET   WHERE THERE WILL NOT BE PARKING ON THE NORTH SIDE OF   THE STREET.       13. [NOT SATISFIED] CAN EXTERIOR SIDEWALK OUTSIDE THE   LEASING LOBBY BE LOWERED, AN ELEVATED LANDING BE   CREATED OUTSIDE THE DOORS TO THE LEASING LOBBY AND   STEPS AND HANDICAP RAMP BE CREATED TO CONNECT THE   EXTERIOR SIDEWALK TO THE LANDING? PREVIOUS COMMENT:   ASSUMING SECTION D IS FOR ROSEMARY AVE, CAN THE FFE OF   22.0 FT NAVD FOR THE LEASING LOBBY AT THE SE CORNER OF   THE DEVELOPMENT BE LOWERED TO REDUCE THE SIDEWALK   ELEVATION OF 21.85 FT AND THEREBY FLATTEN THE SLOPE   BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND BACK OF CURB? AS CURRENTLY   DESIGNED, THIS SLOPE IS AROUND 4:1. THE FFE OF THE REST   OF THE DEVELOPMENT ALONG ROSEMARY AVE. IS 20.6 FT NAVD.       14. [NOT SATISFIED] CONSIDER USING PERVIOUS PAVERS TO   REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF STORMWATER RUNOFF.       15. [NOT SATISFIED] ON THE DRAINAGE PLAN, THE VIEWPORT   SCALE DOES NOT MATCH THE SHEET SCALE. THE DIMENSIONED   LINES APPEAR TO BE 10% SHORTER USING THE SHEET SCALE.       16. [NOT SATISFIED] ASSUMING SECTION E IS FOR 3RD ST.,   THE SECTION SHOWS THE R/W AS 25 FEET WIDE AND THE   SURVEY HAS THE RIGHT OF WAY AT 50 FEET WIDE.       17. [NOT SATISFIED] THE GAP BETWEEN THE LANDSCAPE   ISLAND AND C&G IS NOT SHOWN. PREVIOUS COMMENT: HOW WILL   RUNOFF FLOWING INTO THE 3 PARKING SPACES DIRECTLY EAST   OF THE MIDBLOCK CROSSWALK ON 3RD ST AND INTO THE   PARKLING SPACES ON 2ND STREET REACH A DRAINAGE   STRUCTURE?       18. [NOT SATISFIED] ON SECTION E FOR 3RD STREET, THE   8.0 FEET PARKING SPACE DIMENSION WOULD EXTEND FROM THE   EDGE OF TRAVEL LANE TO THE FACE OF THE 'D' CURB AND   WOULD INCLUDE THE 2-FOOT VALLEY GUTTER AND 6 FEET OF   ASPHALT. THE BACK OF 'D' CURB WOULD BE 3.3 FEET FROM   THE R/W LINE AND THE LANDSCAPE AREA BETWEEN THE   SIDEWALK AND 'D' CURB WOULD BE 6.3 FEET WIDE INSTEAD OF   5 FEET. PREVIOUS COMMENT: ON 3RD STREET, CONSIDER   SLOPING THE PROPOSED PARKING TOWARD THE STREET AND   INSTALL VALLEY GUTTER WHERE THE EXISTING TYPE 'F' C&G   IS LOCATED. TYPE 'D' CURB CAN THEN BE INSTALLED AT THE   HIGH SIDE OF THE PARKIG SPACE AND DRAINAGE STRUCTURES   S-201 AND S-203 MAY NOT BE NEEDED.       19. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE SMALL RETENTION AREAS   BEHIND THE NORTH SIDEWALK OF 2ND STREET BETWEEN STOOPS   TO REDUCE THE AREA DIRECLTY DRAINING TO THE R/W.       20. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] PROPOSED GRADES WILL BE   NEEDED FOR THE DRIVEWAY. THE PROPOSED TRENCH DRAIN AND   CONNECTION TO THE ONSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM SHOULD NOT   ALLOW BYPASS OF THE PERIMETER ELEVATION FOR THE SITE.   PREVIOUS COMMENT: INDICATE HOW THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY TO   SAPODILLA AVE WILL DRAIN.       21. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] ADA MATS MAY BE NEEDED ON   EITHER SIDE OF THIS DRIVEWAY AND ON EACH SIDE OF THE   ENDTRANCE TO THE PARKING GARAGE. PREVIOUS COMMENT: WILL   CURB RAMPS BE NEEDED ON EITHER SIDE OF THIS DRIVEWAY?       22. PROFILE VIEWS OF ALL PROPOSED STORM PIPES WITHIN   THE RIGHT OF WAY WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED WITH THE   ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.       NEW COMMENTS:   23. STOP SIGN AND STOP BAR SHOULD BE BEHIND THE   SIDEWALK FOR THE MIDBLOCK DRIVEWAY TO SAPODILLA AVE.       24. PROPOSED EAST CURB LINE OF SAPODILLA AVE NEAR 3RD   STREET WILL CREATE TOO NARROW OF A STREET FOR TRAFFIC.       25. CHECK INVERT ELEVATIONS AND SLOPES OF PROPOSED   SANITARY SEWERS.       26. PIPE SIZES LISTED WITH SEWER INVERTS DO NOT MATCH   THE PIPE SIZES CALLED OUT FOR THE EXISTING SEWERS ON   ROSEMARY AVE.       27. CAN THE SPOT GRADES OF 24.50 FEET NAVD AT 5 FEET   FROM THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE BE LOWERED TO 24.0 FEET?       TRACY WARD, P.E.   SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT   [email protected]   561-494-1120 (O)   561-351-0510 (M)                 Review Stop STORM STORMWATER Rev No 3 Status F Date 01-15-2021 Cont ID   Sent By tward Date 01-15-2021 Time 13:28 Rev Time 0.00 Received By tward Date 01-15-2021 Time 16:34 Sent To   Notes 2021-01-15 13:43:25 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE   12/23/2020 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE.       1. PROPOSED NORTH CURB DOES NOT ALIGN WITH THE EXISTING   CURB AT THE WEST END OF 2ND STREET. THERE IS ALSO A GAP   BETWEEN THE START OF THE CURB AND THE BEGINNING OF THE   WESTERN PARALLEL PARKING AREA.       2. AVOID PLACEMENT OF MANHOLES AND OTHER STRUCTURES   WITHIN THE SIDEWALK. IF UNAVOIDABLE, LOCATE THE   STRUCTURES AWAY FROM CROSS WALKS WHERE POSSIBLE.       3. DRAINAGE AND SANITARY SEWER PIPES AND STRUCTURES TO   BE LOCATED A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 3 FEET (5 FEET   PREFERRED) FROM WATER MAINS.       4. EASEMENT WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY FOR   THE STORM PIPE BETWEEN S-204 AND THE EXISTING CATCH   BASIN IF THE DESIGN DOES NOT CHANGE.       5. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF STRUCTURE S-201, A TYPE 'D'   DBI IN THE PARKWAY OF 3RD STREET?       6. WILL CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS BE NEEDED TO INSTALL THE   DRAINAGE SYSTEM ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY BOUNDARY?       7. VERIFY THE HGL BETWEEN STRUCTURE CS-1 AND S-101 WILL   NOT EXCEED THE RIM ELEVATION OF S-101.       8. SHOW WHERE THE CROSS SECTIONS PROVIDED ON SHEET C3.1   ARE TAKEN. LABEL THE PARTICULAR STREET RIGHT OF WAY ON   EACH SECTION.       9. ASSUMING SECTION A IS FOR THE WEST PROPERTY LINE   NORTH OF THE ALLEY, DIMENSION THE HORIZONTAL DISTANCE   BETWEEN THE PROPERTY LINE AND THE CENTER OF THE 18"   STORM PIPE.       10. ASSUMING SECTION B IS FOR THE WEST PROPERTY LINE   SOUTH OF THE ALLEY,DIMENSION THE HORIZONTAL DISTANCE   BETWEEN THE PROPERTY LINE AND THE CENTER OF THE 18"   STORM PIPE.       11. ASSUMING SECTION C IS FOR 2ND STREET (30' R/W),   CREATE A DEPRESSION BETWEEN THE BACK OF CURB AND FRONT   OF WALK TO CAPTURE THE STORMWATER RUNOFF FORM THE   SIDEWALK. SHOW WHERE THE EXISTING C&G ON THE NORTH SIDE   IS LOCATED IN RELATION TO THE NORTH R/W LINE.       12. PROVIDE A SECTION OF 2ND STREET WHERE THERE WILL   NOT BE PARKING ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE STREET.       13. ASSUMING SECTION D IS FOR ROSEMARY AVE, CAN THE FFE   OF 22.0 FT NAVD FOR THE LEASING LOBBY AT THE SE CORNER   OF THE DEVELOPMENT BE LOWERED TO REDUCE THE SIDEWALK   ELEVATION OF 21.85 FT AND THEREBY FLATTEN THE SLOPE   BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND BACK OF CURB? AS CURRENTLY   DESIGNED, THIS SLOPE IS AROUND 4:1. THE FFE OF THE REST   OF THE DEVELOPMENT ALONG ROSEMARY AVE. IS 20.6 FT NAVD.       14. CONSIDER USING PERVIOUS PAVERS TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT   OF STORMWATER RUNOFF.       15. ON THE DRAINAGE PLAN, THE VIEWPORT SCALE DOES NOT   MATCH THE SHEET SCALE. THE DIMENSIONED LINES APPEAR TO   BE 10% SHORTER USING THE SHEET SCALE.       16. ASSUMING SECTION E IS FOR 3RD ST., THE SECTION   SHOWS THE R/W AS 25 FEET WIDE AND THE SURVEY HAS THE   RIGHT OF WAY AT 50 FEET WIDE.       17. HOW WILL RUNOFF FLOWING INTO THE 3 PARKING SPACES   DIRECTLY EAST OF THE MIDBLOCK CROSSWALK ON 3RD ST AND   INTO THE PARKLING SPACES ON 2ND STREET REACH A DRAINAGE   STRUCTURE?       18. ON 3RD STREET, CONSIDER SLOPING THE PROPOSED   PARKING TOWARD THE STREET AND INSTALL VALLEY GUTTER   WHERE THE EXISTING TYPE 'F' C&G IS LOCATED. TYPE 'D'   CURB CAN THEN BE INSTALLED AT THE HIGH SIDE OF THE   PARKIG SPACE AND DRAINAGE STRUCTURES S-201 AND S-203   MAY NOT BE NEEDED.       19. PROVIDE SMALL RETENTION AREAS BEHIND THE NORTH   SIDEWALK OF 2ND STREET BETWEEN STOOPS TO REDUCE THE   AREA DIRECLTY DRAINING TO THE R/W.       20. INDICATE HOW THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY TO SAPODILLA AVE   WILL DRAIN.       21. WILL CURB RAMPS BE NEEDED ON EITHER SIDE OF THIS   DRIVEWAY?       22. PROFILE VIEWS OF ALL PROPOSED STORM PIPES WITHIN   THE RIGHT OF WAY WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED WITH THE   ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.       TRACY WARD, PE   SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT   561-494-1120 (O)   561-351-0510 (M)   [email protected]                 Review Stop STORM STORMWATER Rev No 2 Status F Date 11-02-2020 Cont ID   Sent By tward Date 11-02-2020 Time 22:55 Rev Time 0.00 Received By tward Date 11-02-2020 Time 22:58 Sent To   Notes 2020-11-02 22:58:48 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE   10/2/2020 SUBMITTAL REVIEW PACKAGE:       1. SHOW THE PROPERTY LINES/RIGHT OF WAY LINES.       2. SHOW THE EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS TO THE OPPOSITE RIGHT   OF WAY LINES.       3. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM ROAD CENTERLINE TO FACE   OF BUILDING. LABEL STREET RIGHT OF WAY LINE, AND   HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS FOR TRAVEL LANE, EDGE OF   PAVEMENT, RIGHT OF WAY, SIDEWALK WIDTH, LANDSCAPE WIDTH   AND BUILDING SETBACK FROM PROPERTY LINE.       4. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FOR WEST PROPERTY LINE (NORTH   AND SOUTH OF ALLEY) SHOWING PERIMETER BERM (IF   REQUIRED) OR SWALE TO PREVENT DIRECT RUNOFF TO ADJACENT   PROPERTY, AND BUILDING OFFSET DIMENSION.       5. BULBOUTS ALONG 2ND STREET APPEAR TO TRAP WATER ALONG   THE CURB AND GUTTER.       6. CONSIDER CONNECTING S-203 TO EXISTING CURB INLET TO   THE NORTHWEST OF STRUCTURE INSTEAD OF S-204.       7. ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL TO INCLUDE CHANGE IN   HGL FOR 3RD STREET AND ROSEMARY AVE. DRAINAGE SYSTEMS.       8. PROVIDE CONVERSION EQUATION BETWEEN NAVD1988 AND   NGVD1929 ON ALL SHEETS WITH ELEVATION INFORMATION.       9. PROVIDE CONVERSION EQUATION BETWEEN NAVD1988 AND   CITY DATUM OF NGVD1929 ON THE SURVEY.       10. SABAL PALMS PROPOSED OVER PROPOSED STORM PIPE ALONG   WEST PROPERTY LINE.       TRACY WARD, P.E.   SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT   [email protected]   561-494-1120 (O)   561-351-0510 (M) Review Stop STORM STORMWATER Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-10-2019 Cont ID   Sent By tward Date 12-10-2019 Time 14:13 Rev Time 0.00 Received By tward Date 12-10-2019 Time 14:17 Sent To   Notes 2019-12-10 14:15:07 THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL   DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION   PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE   ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT   APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT   APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT   HTTPS://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FO   RMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS       THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE   PLAN APPROVAL:   1. PER ITEM NO. 2 ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS CHECKLIST,   PROVIDE THE CONVERSTION EQUATION TO THE CITY'S VERTICAL   DATUM (NGVD1929) ON THE SURVEY AND ENGINEERING PLANS.       2. LABEL THE VERTICAL DATUM ON THE TREE DISPOSITION   PLAN AND PROVIDE THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929.       3. SHOW THE EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM ON 2ND ST. AND   SAPODILLA AVE.       4. SHOW THE UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.       5. PROVIDE SURVEY OF THE INTERSECTIONS OF SAPODILLA AVE   WITH 2ND STREET AND 3RD STREET.       6. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO SFWMD CRITERIA FOR   WATER QUALITY AND PEAK DISCHARGE LIMITATIONS.       THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO   ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING   BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.       1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY   BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.   THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS   CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE   ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS       2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED   WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.       3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP PRIOR TO STARTING   CONSTRUCTION.       TRACY WARD, PE   SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT   561-494-1120   [email protected]     Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-16-2020 Cont ID   Sent By vnoel Date 10-16-2020 Time 10:48 Rev Time 0.00 Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2020-10-16 10:48:40 1. NEED TO CLEARLY DELINEATE R/W LINES ON ENGINEERING   PLANS NOW, NOT AT FINAL.   2. SIDEWALK/ACCESS/UTILITY EASEMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED   BY PLAT. PREVIOUS PLATTING REQUIREMENT REMAINS.   3. RELOCATE STORM MH IN SE CORNER OUT OF PAVER AREA.   4. IT APPEARS THAT EXFILTRATION TRENCHES AND MANHOLES   WILL BE LOCATED IN/UNDER PORTIONS OF THE SIDEWALK THAT   FALLS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. IF THAT IS THE CASE, CITY   WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE   SIDEWALK.   5. APPROVAL OF ALLEY ABANDONMENT WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR   TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL.   6. VERTICAL DATUM AND CONVERSION NOT SHOWN ON PLANS. Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-10-2019 Cont ID   Sent By vnoel Date 12-10-2019 Time 10:20 Rev Time   Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2019-12-10 10:56:21 1. ALLEY WILL NEED TO BE ABANDONED. HAS APPLICANT   DISCUSSED WITH OWNER OF SW CORNER LOT?   2. REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED AND THE UNITY OF TITLE IN   ORB 30891/307 TERMINATED. SURVEY SHOULD REFLECT   PROPERTY SUBJECT TO UNITY OF TITLE.   3. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL   IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN ADJACENT RIGHT-OF-WAYS.   4. EXISTING SANITARY SEWER WITHIN ALLEY WILL NEED TO BE   RELOCATED.   5. ADD CONVERSION FACTOR TO NGVD-29 ON SURVEY AND   ENGINEERING PLANS. Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 5 Status F Date 03-30-2021 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 03-30-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-03-30 19:57:25 TRAFFIC STUDY COMMENTS:   1. SATISFIED. QUEUE LENGTHS AND AVAILABLE STORAGE   SUMMARY TABLE WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE REPORT. PLEASE   IDENTIFY TABLE NUMBER AND/OR REPORT PAGE SHOWCASING IT.   1A. NOTE: TRAFFIC STUDY SHOWS SIGNIFICANT QUEUING FOR   THE EASTBOUND-LEFT AND SOUTHBOUND-RIGHT TURNING   MOVEMENTS AT THE BANYAN BLVD AND ROSEMARY AVE   INTERSECTION. APPLICANT TO DISCUSS WITH CITY AND ADOPT   TDM STRATEGIES TO MITIGATE TRAFFIC CONGESTION.       SITE PLAN COMMENTS:   2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN PATH FOR   SERVICE AND DELIVERY VEHICLES. THE CITY CODE PROHIBITS   VEHICLES FROM BACKING INTO AND OUT OF PUBLIC   RIGHT-OF-WAY. SHEET EX-1 WAS NOT IN THE SUBMITTED   MATERIAL. PLEASE CLARIFY.   2A. PROVIDE DESIGN VEHICLES' MODEL DIMENSIONS   2B. PROVIDE ANALYSIS SHOWCASING VEHICLE'S DYNAMIC   ENVELOPE. VEHICLE PATH LINES SHOULD BE COLORED OR   DIFFERENT WEIGHT/PATTERN FROM SURROUNDING FEATURES   2C. PROVIDE SEPARATE OUTPUT FOR EACH VEHICLE MANEUVER   (I.E. MANEUVER IN AND OUT)   3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE TURNAROUND SPACE AT THE   DEAD-END ON THE 5TH FLOOR OR TOP FLOOR OF THE PARKING   GARAGE PER CITY CODE REQUIREMENT. AUTOTURN ANALYSIS   NEEDED TO VERIFY AND VALIDATE. SHEET A-2.6 SHOWS   VEHICLE'S DYNAMIC ENVELOPE ENCROACHMENT WITH PARKING   SPACE NUMBER 391. PLEASE REMOVE THE AFFECTED PARKING   STALL AND UPDATE FINAL SITE PLAN ACCORDINGLY.   3A. RESUBMISSION SHOWS QUESTIONABLE VEHICLE?S POSITION   WITH RESPECT TO ITS TRAJECTORY. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDING   TO PREVIOUS COMMENT GUIDELINES.   4. NOT SATISFIED. CONSIDER RELOCATING THE MIDBLOCK   CROSSWALK ON 3RD STREET TO ALIGN WITH PROPOSED   DEVELOPMENT WALKWAY. PROVIDE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION   SHOWCASING APPLICABLE SAFETY AND VISIBILITY   REQUIREMENTS DISQUALIFYING SUCH RELOCATION. LATEST   COMMENT SET SHOWS: "BIZI". PLEASE CLARIFY.   4A. APPLICANT HAS NOT DISCUSSED WITH THE CITY   5. NOT SATISFIED. COORDINATE WITH CITY STAFF FOR   FURTHER TDM STRATEGIES. PLEASE PROVIDE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT   OF SUCH ITEM OR LIST OF AGREED TDM STRATEGIES.   5A. APPLICANT HAS NOT DISCUSSED WITH THE CITY   6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. MINIMUM TRAVEL LANE WIDTH IS 9   FEET, NOT INCLUDING GUTTER. PLEASE REVISE SITE PLAN TO   SHOWCASE WIDTH OF GUTTER AND TRAVEL LANES SEPARATELY ON   2ND AND 3RD ST   6A. PROVIDE TRAVEL LANE DIMENSIONS EXCLUDING CURB AND   GUTTER. NOTE: MINIMUM ROADWAY WIDTH ALONG 2ND ST SHOULD   BE 12 FEET PER CITY CODE SEC. 94-485 FIGURE XV-2 AND   PARALLEL PARKING STALL MANEUVERABILITY REQUIREMENTS.   6B. NO DIMENSIONS PROVIDED FOR 3RD ST. PLEASE REVISE.   NOTE: ACCORDING TO FDOT GREENBOOK STANDARDS, THE   MINIMUM WIDTH OF A TWO-WAY RESIDENTIAL ROADWAY SHOULD   BE 20 FEET FROM EDGE-OF-PAVEMENT TO EDGE-OF-PAVEMENT   (EXCLUDING CURBS AND GUTTERS).   NOTED COMMENTS:   - EASEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE PORTION OF SIDEWALK   OUTSIDE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.   - ALLEY ABANDONMENT SHOULD COMPLY WITH CITY CODE SEC.   94-112, INCLUDE THE APPLICABLE ADDITIONAL OPEN SPACE   REQUIREMENT. DEAD-END ALLEY IS PROHIBITED. PROVIDE   RESULT OF THE ALLY ABANDONMENT APPLICATION ONCE   COMPLETED.     Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 4 Status F Date 01-05-2021 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 01-05-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date 12-23-2020 Time   Sent To   Notes 2021-01-05 15:08:37 TRAFFIC STUDY COMMENTS:   1. QUEUE LENGTHS AND AVAILABLE STORAGE SUMMARY TABLE   WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE REPORT. PLEASE IDENTIFY TABLE   NUMBER AND/OR REPORT PAGE SHOWCASING IT.       SITE PLAN COMMENTS:   2. PROVIDE AUTOTURN PATH FOR SERVICE AND DELIVERY   VEHICLES. THE CITY CODE PROHIBITS VEHICLES FROM BACKING   INTO AND OUT OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. SHEET EX-1 WAS NOT   IN THE SUBMITTED MATERIAL. PLEASE CLARIFY.   3. PROVIDE TURNAROUND SPACE AT THE DEAD-END ON THE 5TH   FLOOR OR TOP FLOOR OF THE PARKING GARAGE PER CITY CODE   REQUIREMENT. AUTOTURN ANALYSIS NEEDED TO VERIFY AND   VALIDATE. SHEET A-2.6 SHOWS VEHICLE?S DYNAMIC ENVELOPE   ENCROACHMENT WITH PARKING SPACE NUMBER 391. PLEASE   REMOVE THE AFFECTED PARKING STALL AND UPDATE FINAL SITE   PLAN ACCORDINGLY.   4. CONSIDER RELOCATING THE MIDBLOCK CROSSWALK ON 3RD   STREET TO ALIGN WITH PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WALKWAY.   PROVIDE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION SHOWCASING APPLICABLE   SAFETY AND VISIBILITY REQUIREMENTS DISQUALIFYING SUCH   RELOCATION. LATEST COMMENT SET SHOWS: ?BIZI?. PLEASE   CLARIFY.   5. COORDINATE WITH CITY STAFF FOR FURTHER TDM   STRATEGIES. PLEASE PROVIDE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SUCH ITEM   OR LIST OF AGREED TDM STRATEGIES.   6. MINIMUM TRAVEL LANE WIDTH IS 9?, NOT INCLUDING   GUTTER. PLEASE REVISE SITE PLAN TO SHOWCASE GUTTER AND   TRAVEL LANES? WIDTH SEPARATELY ON 2ND AND 3RD ST           NOTED COMMENTS:   A) EASEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE PORTION OF   SIDEWALK OUTSIDE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.   B) ALLEY ABANDONMENT SHOULD COMPLY WITH CITY CODE SEC.   94-112, INCLUDE THE APPLICABLE ADDITIONAL OPEN SPACE   REQUIREMENT. DEAD-END ALLEY IS PROHIBITED. PROVIDE   RESULT OF THE ALLY ABANDONMENT APPLICATION ONCE   COMPLETED.       VALERIO ORICCHIO   CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER   561-494-1092   [email protected]     Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 3 Status F Date 12-14-2020 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 12-14-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2020-12-14 19:58:32 TRAFFIC STUDY COMMENTS:   1. BANYAN/ROSEMARY SYNCHRO ANALYSIS:   1A. PLEASE CLARIFY WHY THE FUTURE SCENARIO HAS OVERALL   LESS DELAY THAN THE BACKGROUND ONE, AS SHOWN IN TABLE 3   AND 4, RESPECTIVELY   1B. PLEASE PROVIDE SYNCHRO OUTPUT SHOWCASING QUEUE   STORAGE LENGTH SETTING/ASSUMPTIOS   1C. BACKGROUND AND FUTURE SCENARIO NETWORK SHALL BE   CODED ACCORDING TO THE ON-GOING BANYAN BOULEVARD   STREETSCAPE PROJECT?S ROADWAY PLANS. THE CITY CAN   PROVIDE SUCH PLANS.       SITE PLAN COMMENTS:   2. PROVIDE AUTOTURN PATH FOR SERVICE AND DELIVERY   VEHICLES. THE CITY CODE PROHIBITS VEHICLES FROM BACKING   INTO AND OUT OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE ITEM WAS NOT   PROVIDED TO THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER.   3. PROVIDE TURNAROUND SPACE AT THE DEAD-END ON THE 5TH   FLOOR OR TOP FLOOR OF THE PARKING GARAGE PER CITY CODE   REQUIREMENT. AUTOTURN ANALYSIS NEEDED TO VERIFY AND   VALIDATE. PLEASE PROVIDE REFERENCE SHEET NAME/NUMBER,   AS THE LATEST SUBMISSION DOES NOT SHOWCASE ANY REVISION   ON THE MATTER.   4. REDUCE WIDTH OF THE ONE-WAY DRIVEWAY TO 12 FEET.   PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR DRIVING ISLES, DRIVEWAYS AND   PARKING STALLS. IF ALREADY PRESENTED, PLEASE PROVIDE   REFERENCE SHEET NUMBER. LATEST SUBMISSION DOES NOT   PROVIDE THE REQUESTED REVISIONS IN SHEET SP-1.   5. CONSIDER RELOCATING THE MIDBLOCK CROSSWALK ON 3RD   STREET TO ALIGN WITH PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WALKWAY.   PROVIDE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION SHOWCASING APPLICABLE   SAFETY AND VISIBILITY REQUIREMENTS DISQUALIFYING SUCH   RELOCATION.   6. PROVIDE A MICRO-MOBILITY AREA WITH THE FOLLOWING   CHARACTERISTICS:   6A. 8? X 20? DIMENSIONS   6B. LOCATED NEAR AN ENTRANCE AND ACCESSIBLE TO THE   PUBLIC   6C. PROVIDE A CONDUIT (2" SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO THE POWER   SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V CIRCUIT)   7. COORDINATE WITH CITY STAFF FOR FURTHER TDM   STRATEGIES       NOTED COMMENTS:   - EASEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE PORTION OF SIDEWALK   OUTSIDE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.   - PROVIDE DETAILS ON THE ALLEY ABANDONMENT. ALLEY   ABANDONMENT SHOULD COMPLY WITH CITY CODE SEC. 94-112,   INCLUDE THE APPLICABLE ADDITIONAL OPEN SPACE   REQUIREMENT. DEAD-END ALLEY IS PROHIBITED.           VALERIO ORICCHIO   CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER   561-494-1092   [email protected]     Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-09-2020 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 10-28-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2020-10-09 12:09:20 TRAFFIC STUDY COMMENTS:   1. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER.   2. PROVIDE INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR THE FOLLOWING:   A. BANYAN AND SAPODILLA   B. BANYAN AND ROSEMARY   C. 3RD AND QUADRILLE   D. 3RD AND ROSEMARY       SITE PLAN COMMENTS:   1. PROVIDE BICYCLE RACKS NEARBY MAIN ENTRANCES AND/OR   COMMERCIAL SITE(S). RECORD THE PROVIDED NUMBER OF   SPACES/RACKS IN THE DATA TABLE.   2. PROVIDE AUTOTURN PATH FOR SERVICE AND DELIVERY   VEHICLES. THE CITY CODE PROHIBITS VEHICLES FROM BACKING   INTO AND OUT OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.   3. PROVIDE TURNAROUND SPACE AT THE DEAD-END ON THE 5TH   FLOOR OR TOP FLOOR OF THE PARKING GARAGE PER CITY CODE   REQUIREMENT. LATEST SUBMISSION DOES NOT CLEARLY SHOW   THE BACK OUT SPACE. AUTOTURN ANALYSIS NEEDED TO VERIFY   AND VALIDATE.   4. REDUCE WIDTH OF THE ONE-WAY DRIVEWAY TO 12 FEET.   PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR DRIVING ISLES, DRIVEWAYS AND   PARKING STALLS. IF ALREADY PRESENTED, PLEASE PROVIDE   REFERENCE SHEET NUMBER.   5. PROVIDE PARKING DATA TABLE ON SITE PLAN   6. EASEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE PORTION OF   SIDEWALK OUTSIDE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.   7. PROVIDE DETAILS ON THE ALLEY ABANDONMENT. ALLEY   ABANDONMENT SHOULD COMPLY WITH CITY CODE SEC. 94-112,   INCLUDE THE APPLICABLE ADDITIONAL OPEN SPACE   REQUIREMENT. DEAD-END ALLEY IS PROHIBITED.   8. CONSIDER RELOCATING THE MIDBLOCK CROSSWALK ON 3RD   STREET TO ALIGN WITH PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WALKWAY.   9. IMPLEMENT THE FOLLOWING TRANSPORTATION DEMAND   MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE   CITY?S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:   A. UNBUNDLE PARKING FROM RESIDENTS? LEASES.   B. PROVIDE SUBSIDIZED TRI-RAIL PASS, PALM TRAN BUS PASS   OR SUBSIDIZED MICRO-MOBILITY SERVICE TO RESIDENTS.           VALERIO ORICCHIO   CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER   561-494-1092   [email protected]           VALERIO ORICCHIO   CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER   561-494-1092   [email protected]     Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date 01-17-2020 Time   Rev Time   Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2020-01-17 16:23:14 TRAFFIC STUDY COMMENTS:   1. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER.   2. PROVIDE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION STUDY.   3. COORDINATE WITH ENGINEERING ON THE STUDY   INTERSECTION REQUIREMENT.           SITE PLAN COMMENTS:   1. INCLUDE THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED BICYCLE PARKING IN   THE SITE DATA TABLE.   2. PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING SPACES FOR PUBLIC USE. THESE   BICYCLE PARKING SPACES SHOULD BE DISTRIBUTED ALONG SITE   FRONTAGE.   3. INCLUDE THE REQUIRED AND PROPOSED LOADING SPACE IN   THE SITE DATA TABLE.   4. PROVIDE AUTOTURN PATH FOR SERVICE AND DELIVERY   VEHICLES. THE CITY CODE PROHIBITS VEHICLES FROM BACKING   INTO AND OUT OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.   5. PROVIDE TURNAROUND SPACE AT THE DEAD-END ON THE 5TH   FLOOR OF THE PARKING GARAGE PER CITY CODE REQUIREMENT.   6. REDUCE WIDTH OF ONE-WAY DRIVEWAY TO 12 FEET.   7. DRIVEWAYS SHOULD MAINTAIN THE SIDEWALK ELEVATION.   8. EASEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE PORTION OF   SIDEWALK OUTSIDE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.   9. THE INTERNAL DROP-OFF AREA IS NOT WIDE ENOUGH TO   ALLOW CARS TO BYPASS. PLEASE VERIFY AND REVISE.   10. PROVIDE DETAILS ON THE ALLEY ABANDONMENT. ALLEY   ABANDONMENT SHOULD COMPLY WITH CITY CODE SEC. 94-112,   INCLUDE THE APPLICABLE ADDITIONAL OPEN SPACE   REQUIREMENT. DEAD-END ALLEY IS PROHIBITED.   11. CONVERT 2ND STREET BETWEEN SAPODILLA AVENUE AND   ROSEMARY AVENUE TO TWO-WAY STREET.   12. RELOCATE THE MIDBLOCK CROSSWALK ON 3RD STREET TO   THE LOCATION OF THE PUBLIC PLAZA, AND PROVIDE RAISED   CROSSWALK WITH CURB EXTENSION ON BOTH SIDES OF THE   CROSSWALK.   13. IMPLEMENT THE FOLLOWING TRANSPORTATION DEMAND   MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE   CITY?S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:   A. UNBUNDLE PARKING FROM RESIDENTS? LEASES.   B. PROVIDE SUBSIDIZED TRI-RAIL PASS, PALM TRAN BUS PASS   OR SUBSIDIZED MICRO-MOBILITY SERVICE TO RESIDENTS.           SHING TSOI   CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT   561-494-1141   [email protected]   (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS)     Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 4 Status F Date 03-30-2021 Cont ID   Sent By aaponte Date 03-30-2021 Time 16:37 Rev Time 0.00 Received By aaponte Date 03-22-2021 Time 10:35 Sent To   Notes 2021-03-30 13:24:38 COMMENTS TO THE 11-23-20 RESUBMITTAL   1. SATISFIED-   2. SATISFIED.   3. SATISFIED.   4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE SECTION INDICATES A TRAVEL   LANE ON 2ND AS 10 FEET BUT INCLUDING THE GUTTER.   FURTHER DISCUSSSION WITH ENGINEERING STAFF NEEDED TO   DETERMINE IF THAT IS ACCEPTABLE.PREVIOUS COMMENT:THE   TRAVEL LANE ON 2ND STREET IS SHOWN AS 9 FEET IN WITH   DUE TO THE PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING. FURTHER   DISCUSSION WITH TRAFFIC ENGINEER IS NEEDED TO DETERMINE   IF THAT WIDTH IS ADEQUATE OR ADJUSTMENT ARE NEEDED.   PREVIOUS COMMENT: WHAT IS THE WIDTH OF THE TRAVEL LANES   ON 2ND STREET? IS IT CHANGE FROM CURRENT?   5. SATISFIED. PLEASE MODIFY TO FOLLOW THE ANGLE OF THE   CURB OR PEOPLE WILL DESTROY THE LANDSCAPE FOLLOWING THE   EASIER PATH OF TRAVEL. PREVIOUS COMMENT: SIDEWALK ON   EAST SIDE OF 3RD STREET SHALL FOLLOW THE CURB   ALIGNMENT.   6. SATISFIED. PLEASE UPDATE SHEET A-03 TO REFLECT   CHANGES ALONG ROSEMARY. PREVIOUS COMMENT: PROPOSED   ON-STREET PARKING ALONG ROSEMARY WILL NOT BE POSSIBLE,   PLEASE REMOVE PROPOSED STRIPING.   7. NOT SATISFIED. THE SECTIONS PROVIDED INDICATE A   POSSIBLE PROBLEM OF ELEVATION ON 2ND STREET AND   ROSEMARY AVENUE. THE CROSS SLOPE INDICATED ON THE   PLANTING AREA ALONG ROSEMARY AVENUE WILL CREATE A   PROBLEMATIC RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND THE   STREET. FURTHER DISCUSSION WITH STAFF IS NEEDED TO   SOLVE THE ISSUE.- PREVIOUS COMMENT:PLEASE PREPARE SOME   CROSS SECTIONS FOR 2ND STREET AND 3RD STREET.   8. SATISFIED. PLEASE JUSTIFY WHY THE FDC ON 2ND STREET   CANNOT BE WALL MOUNTED. IF IT CANNOT BE WALL MOUNTED IT   SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE LANDSCAPE AREA AND NOT ON   THE SIDEWALK. PREVIOUS COMMENT: IF POSSIBLE FDC SHALL   BE WALL MOUNTED.   9. NOT SATISFIED. IT SEEMS ALL THE ABOVE GROUND AND   WATER AND IRRIGATION METERS ARE NOW LOCATED ALONG THE   GARAGE FRONTAGE ON 2ND AND WITHIN THE MINIMUM SETBACK,   SUBSTANTIALLY REDUCING THE AREA FOR LANDSCAPING. PLEASE   CLARIFY HOW THE UTILITIES ARE LOCATED. CAN THE   CONNECTIONS BE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE GARAGE?   PREVIOUS COMMENT: PLEASE COORDINATE WITH ENGINEERING   FOR THE LOCATION OF THE DCDA. VALVE SHALL BE LOCATED   BEHIND THE MINIMUM SETBACK AND SCREENED WITH LANDSCAPE.   PREVIOUS COMMENT: DCDA INDICATED ON 2ND STREET EAST OF   THE PARKING GARAGE IS LISTED TO BE LOCATED UNDERGROUND.   VAULT WILL NOT BE PERMITTED BY THE PUBLIC UTILITIES   DEPARTMENT. NEW DCDA LOCATION SHALL BE BEHIND THE   MINIMUM SETBACK AND SCREENED WITH LANDSCAPE.   10. SATISFIED. PROPOSED EXFILTRATION TRENCH WILL   CONFLICT WITH THE REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL FOR THE   STREET TREE. PLEASE DISCUSS WITH LANDSCAPE PLANNER IF   THE CONTINUOUS PLANTING AREA WILL BE SUFFICIENT FOR   TREES AND THERE IS NO NEED FOR STRUCTURAL SOIL.   11. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE MAXIMUM BUILDING   FOOTPRINT TABLE TO ACCURATELY REFLECT THE REQUIREMENT   FOR PROPERTIES LARGER THAN 80,000SF.   12. PARTIALLY SATISFIED CALCULATION FOR 60% ACTIVE USE   REQUIREMENT NOT ACCURATELY SHOWN. ACTIVE USE % IS BASED   ON THE BUILDABLE LOT FRONTAGE.-PREVIOUS COMMENT: BIKE   STORAGE ALONG 2ND STREET CANNOT BE COUNTED AS ACTIVE   USE. PLEASE REMOVE FROM CALCULATION. THE STREET   FRONTAGE IS CALCULATED DISCOUNTING THE MINIMUM   SETBACKS. PREVIOUS COMMENT: PLEASE PROVIDE A GRAPHIC TO   CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENT AS   LISTED IN TABLE WITHIN SHEET A-01.   13. SATISFIED. APPLICANT SUBMITTED FOR A VARIANCE   REQUEST. PREVIOUS COMMENT: CODE REQUIRES AN AVERAGE   UNIT SIZE OF 800SF. PROJECT PROPOSED AVERAGE UNIT SIZE   OF 765SF. A VARIANCE WILL BE NECESSARY IF NOT ADJUSTED   TO MEET REQUIREMENT.   14. SATISFIED. ON THE 2ND FLOOR, THE AREA LISTED AS   OPEN TO BELOW CAN BE DISCOUNTED FORM THE GBA   CALCULATIONS. PREVIOUS COMMENT: THE SQUARE FOOTAGE   TABLE LISTS TRASH WITHIN THE NON-LEASABLE AREA. THE   TRASH CHUTE CAN BE EXCLUDED FROM GBA BUT THE ROOM WHERE   THE TRASH CHUTE IS LOCATED WITHIN EACH FLOOR SHALL BE   COUNTED AS GBA.   15. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADJUST THE TRANSPARENCY   CALCULATION GRAPHIC IN SHEET A-03 TO INDICATE THE 10   FEET MARK AND CONFIRM THE CALCULATION IS BASED ON THAT   DIMENSION. TRANSPARENCY IS ONLY REQUIRED FOR   NON-RESIDENTIAL ACTIVE USES (LOBBY AND COMMERCIAL   SPACE).   16. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE GRAPHIC INFORMATION TO   CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH PLANAR BREAK, HORIZONTAL   PROJECTIONS AND ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT FOR FACADES   ENCLOSING NON-ACTIVE USES (GARAGE). PREVIOUS COMMENT:   PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH   ALL THE ELEMENTS REQUIRED BY TABLE IV-4 FACADE   ARTICULATION REQUIREMENTS.   17. SATISFIED. PLEASE INCORPORATE THE CONDITIONS OF   APPROVAL FROM THE HPB REVIEW AND REDESIGN THE WEST AND   SOUTH PARKING GARAGE FACADES. PREVIOUS COMMENTS:   FURTHER STUDY IS NECESSARY FOR THE WEST ELEVATION AS IT   WILL BE HIGHLY VISIBLE FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THE   PARKING GARAGE FACADES NEED ADDITIONAL WORK TO COMPLY   WITH THE REQUIREMENT FOR ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT OF   NON-ACTIVE USES. THE WEST STAIR CAN INCORPORATE SOME   WINDOWS OR TREATMENT TO IMPROVE THE FACADE. THE PARKING   GARAGE NORTH ELEVATION WILL BE ALSO VISIBLE AND NEED   SOME IMPROVEMENTS.   18. SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED   GROUND SETBACK ON ALL FLOOR PLANS AND THE CONDITIONAL   SETBACK LINE ON EACH OF THE REQUIRED LEVELS. ALSO   CLEARLY INCLUDE THE PROPERTY LINE IN ALL DRAWINGS,   INCLUDING CIVILS AND LANDSCAPE.   19. SATISFIED. IN SHEET A-02 PLEASE REFER TO MAXIMUM   PROPOSED GBA, NOT FAR.   20. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. FENESTRATION TO COVER A   MINIMUM OF 15% OF THE TOWNHOUSE EAST FACADE SHALL BE   PROVIDED. PREVIOUS COMMENT:EASTERN MOST TOWN HOUSE UNIT   SHALL BE SETBACK FOR THE SIDE INTERIOR PROPERTY LINE A   MINIMUM OF 10 FEET. PREVIOUS COMMENT: PLEASE PROVIDE A   SIDE INTERIOR SETBACK FOR THE EAST PROPERTY LINE.   21. SATISFIED. PLEASE LIST THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING   SPACES REQUIRED BY CODE, AND THE TOTAL NUMBER OF BIKE   SPACES REQUIRED BY CODE (WITHIN THE BUILDING FOR   BUILDING TENANTS AT 1/15 PARKING SPACES, AND ALONG THE   STREET FRONTAGE 1/100 LINEAR FEET OF FRONTAGE). THE   TABLE LISTING THE REQUIRED PARKING BY CODE IS NOT   ACCURATE. PLEASE USE PROVISIONS IN SEC 94-111 OF THE   ZLDRS.   22. SATISFIED.   23. SATISFIED. WHAT IS THE BACK OUT SPACE AT THE GROUND   LEVEL PARKING GARAGE?   24. SATISFIED. PLEASE CHECK THE LABELING OF THE FACADES   AS THEY ARE NOT ACCURATE. PREVIOUS COMMENT: PLEASE   LOCATE THE EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN THE BLOCK THAT   ARE NOT PART OF THE PROJECT FOR REFERENCE.   25. SATISFIED. STAFF WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS THE ARCADE   REMOVAL IN RELATION TO POSSIBLE FUTURE TENANTS.   PREVIOUS COMMENT: STAFF WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS THE   POSSIBLE RE-DESIGN OF THE RETAIL SPACE ALONG ROSEMARY   AVENUE. ARCADES DO NOT HAVE A RECORD OF SUCCESS FOR   COMMERCIAL SPACES.   26. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE ELEVATIONS TO REFLECT THE   CHANGE TO SWING DOOR FOR RESIDENTIAL WALK UP UNITS.   PREVIOUS COMMENT: WALK UP UNIT DOORS SHALL BE DESIGNED   LIKE FRONT DOORS AND NOT SLIDERS.   27. SATISFIED. THE GARAGE ELEVATION NEEDS ENHANCEMENT   TO COMPLY WITH THE PROVISION OF ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT   FOR NON-ACTIVE USES. ENHANCED DESIGN MAY INCORPORATE   SOME OF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FROM THE HPB BOARD.   PREVIOUS COMMENT: GARAGE HAS BIG BLANK WALL ALONG 2ND   STREET. OPTION COULD BE TO MOVE THE BIKE STORAGE THERE.   28. SATISFIED. THE GARAGE ELEVATION NEEDS ENHANCEMENT   TO COMPLY WITH THE PROVISION OF ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT   FOR NON-ACTIVE USES. ENHANCED DESIGN MAY INCORPORATE   SOME OF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FROM THE HPB BOARD.   PREVIOUS COMMENT: GARAGE ELEVATION ALONG 2ND STREET   SHALL INCLUDE ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT.   28A SATISFIED. STAFF RECOMMENDS THE SECONDARY ENTRANCE   ON 2ND STREET TO BE HIGHLIGHTED TO BREAK THE CONTINUITY   OF THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS.   29. SATISFIED. ADDITIONAL WORK IS STILL NECESSARY IN   COORDINATION TO THE ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT OF THE   PARKING GARAGE. PREVIOUS COMMENT: THE WEST ELEVATION OF   THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING SHALL BE ENHANCED TO PROJECT A   GOOD FACADE TOWARDS THE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. THE   WEST HALLWAY FACADE SHALL INCORPORATE WINDOWS.   30. SATISFIED. STREETSCAPE DESIGN ALONG ROSEMARY AVENUE   SHALL FOLLOW THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE DANCE INTO THE   SUNSET STREETSCAPE DESIGN.   31. SATISFIED. EXISTING DECORATIVE LIGHTS ALONG 3RD   STREET SHALL BE REPLACED FOR CURRENT DOWNTOWN STANDARD,   AND NEW DECORATIVE FIXTURES SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG   2ND STREET TO MEET THE MINIMUM 0.6 FOOTCANDLE REQUIRED.   ALONG THE ROSEMARY FRONTAGE DECORATIVE LIGHTS MATCHING   THE NEW LIGHT FIXTURES AND POLES BEING INSTALLED BY THE   CITY SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG THE PROJECT FRONTAGE.   PREVIOUS COMMENT: PROJECT IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE   DECORATIVE STREET LIGHT ALONG THE STREET FRONTAGE TO   MEET THE MINIMUM 0.6 FOOT-CANDLES REQUIRED. LIGHT   FIXTURE SHALL MATCH CITY STANDARD.   32. SATISFIED. SEE HPB CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. PREVIOUS   COMMENT: A PORTION OF THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE   HISTORIC DISTRICT, THEREFORE HPB APPROVAL FOR A COA   WILL BE REQUIRED. PLEASE CONTACT FRIEDERIKE MITTNER AT   561-822-1457 TO DISCUSS REQUIREMENTS FOR SUCH   APPLICATION. THE COA SHALL BE OBTAINED BEFORE   PROCEEDING TO DAC FOR SPECIAL REVIEW.   33. ACKNOWLEDGED. DEMOLITION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS ON   SITE CANNOT OCCUR UNTIL BUILDING PERMIT FOR NEW   CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN APPROVED.   34. NOT SATISFIED. TO BE INCLUDED AS A CONDITION IN   SITE PLAN APPROVAL LETTER. PREVIOUS COMMENT: A PROPERTY   RE-PLAT WILL BE REQUIRED.   35. SATISFIED. AN APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED ON NOVEMBER   12, 2020. STAFF STARTED THE PROCESS FOR THE ALLEY   ABANDONMENT AND WILL NOTIFY THE APPLICANT IF ADDITIONAL   INFORMATION IS NEEDED. REQUEST WILL GO THE DAC AT THE   SAME TIME THAN THE SPECIAL REVIEW, AND TO CITY   COMMISSION AFTER THAT. STAFF HAS DETERMINED THE OPEN   SPACE REQUIREMENT HAS BEEN MET BY THE PROJECT THROUGH   THE ADDITIONAL PRIVATE OPEN SPACE PROVIDED. A WAIVER   WILL NOT BE NECESSARY. PREVIOUS COMMENT: AN APPLICATION   SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR THE ALLEY ABANDONMENT. THE ALLEY   ABANDONMENT REQUIRES THAT A PUBLIC OPEN SPACE   EQUIVALENT TO THE AREA OF THE ABANDONED ALLEY BE   ALLOCATED ON SITE. ALLEY AREA = 15 X500=7,500SF. PLEASE   INDICATE IF A PUBLIC OPEN SPACE EQUAL TO 7,500 SF CAN   BE LOCATED ON SITE. IF NOT, A WAIVER OF SUCH PROVISION   SHALL BE REQUESTED TO THE CITY COMMISSION AS PART OF   THE ALLEY ABANDONMENT PROCESS. IS THERE ANY POSSIBILITY   TO PROVIDE ANY PUBLIC OPEN SPACE ON SITE TO COMPLY WITH   THE ALLEY ABANDONMENT PROVISION? SMALLER THAN THE   REQUIRED?   36. SATISFIED. HAS THE PROPERTY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF   THE ALLEY (NOT PART OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT) CONFIRMED   SUPPORT FOR ALLEY ABANDONMENT?   37. SATISFIED. THE PROJECT REQUIRES DAC APPROVAL FOR   SPECIAL REVIEW. IN PREPARATION FOR THE DAC, PLEASE   PROVIDE COLORED ELEVATIONS IN CONTEXT FOR DAC SPECIAL   REVIEW, MORE DETAILED COLORED ELEVATIONS WITH CALL OUT   MATERIALS AND PICTURES OF PROPOSED MATERIALS, AND   STREET LEVEL RENDERS.   38. ACKNOWLEDGED. EASEMENTS WILL BE INCLUDED IN   RE-PLAT. PREVIOUS COMMENT: PROJECT WILL BE REQUIRED TO   PROVIDE A SIDEWALK ACCESS EASEMENT FOR THE SIDEWALK   LOCATED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY.   39. ACKNOWLEDGED. PROJECT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE   MAINTENANCE OF ALL HARDSCAPE AND LANDSCAPE INSTALLED   WITHIN THE ROW AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. A MAINTENANCE   AGREEMENT SHALL BE SIGNED BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE   DEVELOPER BEFORE FINAL CO.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:   40. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE PARKING TABLE TO   REFLECT THE ACCURATE PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR RETAIL   WITHIN THIS DISTRICT AS FOLLOWS: MIN-1/1,000SF; MAX   2/1,000SF.   41. SATISFIED.PLEASE RELOCATE AT LEAST TWO OF THE BIKE   PARKING AT THE PEDESTRIAN EXIT ON 3RD STREET TO THE   ROSEMARY AVENUE FRONTAGE, IN FRONT OF RETAIL AREA.   42. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE COORDINATE ALL THE DIFFERENT   ISCIPLINES AS THE LANDSCAPE, CIVIL AND SITE PLAN DO NOT   SEEM TO MATCH. IF THE ON-STREET PARKING IS ALLOWED TO   COUNT THE GUTTER FOR THE MINIMUM 8 FEET IN WIDTH, THE   GUTTER CLOSER TO THE TRAVEL LANE CANNOT BE INCLUDED IN   THE WIDTH OF THE LOADING PARKING SPACE.DRAWINGS C.2.3   SHOWS THE ON-STREET PARKING ON 3RD AS 8 FEET PLUS THE   GUTTER. PREVIOUS COMMENT:PLEASE DISCUSS WITH   ENGINEERING DEPT THE POSSIBILITY TO REDUCE THE PARKING   SPACES TO 8 FEET INCLUDING THE GUTTER. THAT WILL ALLOW   ONE ADDITIONAL FOOT TO THE AREA IN FRONT OF THE   RESIDENTIAL UNITS ON 3RD STREET AND PROVIDE ADDITIONAL   PRIVACY FOR THE FIRST FLOOR UNITS. IN ADDITION, THE   PLANTING AREA NEXT TO THE CURB CAN BE REDUCED TO 4 FEET   IN WIDTH, ALSO PROVIDING ONE ADDITIONAL FOOT THAT CAN   BE INCORPORATED WITHIN THE FRONT YARD OF THE FIRST   FLOOR RESIDENTIAL UNITS ON 3RD STREET.   43. SATISFIED.PLEASE REDUCE THE PARKING GARAGE ENTRANCE   FROM SAPODILLA AVE AND 2ND STREET TO 20 FEET IN TOTAL   WIDTH.   44. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SEE COMMENT NO. 42. PREVIOUS   COMMENT:THE PLANTING AREA NEXT TO THE CURB ALONG 3RD   STREET MAY BE REDUCE TO 4 FEET IN WIDTH. THE SIDEWALK   CAN BE MOVED 1 FOOT NORTH AND THE ADDITIONAL FOOT SHALL   BE ALLOCATED TO THE FRONT PLATING AREA OF THE   RESIDENTIAL UNITS.             Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 3 Status F Date 12-11-2020 Cont ID   Sent By aaponte Date 12-11-2020 Time 15:32 Rev Time 0.00 Received By aaponte Date 11-23-2020 Time 15:32 Sent To   Notes 2020-12-11 15:33:12 COMMENTS TO THE 11-23-20 RESUBMITTAL   1. NOT SATISFIED. TABLE NEEDS TO LIST THE RESULTING GSF   FOR EACH OF THE CATEGORIES AND TOTAL THE GBA PERMITTED   BY RIGHT AND WITH INCENTIVES. PREVIOUS COMMENT: ON   SHEET A-01 PLEASE CREATE A SITE DATA TABLE THAT   INCLUDES THE THREE DIFFERENT ZONING DESIGNATION ON   SITE, THE AREA OF EACH, THE CORRESPONDING BASE FAR AND   RESULTING GBA ALLOWED BY RIGHT, AND THE ADDITIONAL FAR   AND GBA ALLOWED WITH INCENTIVES FOR EACH BASE ZONING.   THIS TABLE WILL LIST THE MAXIMUM GBA ALLOWED ON SITE BY   RIGHT AND INCENTIVES. TABLE ALSO NEEDS TO INCLUDE THE   PROPOSED GSF AND THE NUMBER OF TDRS NEEDED FOR THE   PROJECT.   2. SATISFIED. SURVEY AND CIVIL DRAWING SHALL INDICATE   THE EXISTING CURB ACROSS STREET AND DIMENSION THE   EXISTING TRAVEL LANES AFTER CHANGES.   3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF   THE EXISTING CURB AND THE PROPOSED LOCATION, IF   CHANGED.   4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE TRAVEL LANE ON 2ND STREET   IS SHOWN AS 9 FEET IN WITH DUE TO THE PROPOSED   ON-STREET PARKING. FURTHER DISCUSSION WITH TRAFFIC   ENGINEER IS NEEDED TO DETERMINE IF THAT WIDTH IS   ADEQUATE OR ADJUSTMENT ARE NEEDED. PREVIOUS COMMENT:   WHAT IS THE WIDTH OF THE TRAVEL LANES ON 2ND STREET? IS   IT CHANGE FROM CURRENT?   5. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE MODIFY TO FOLLOW THE ANGLE OF   THE CURB OR PEOPLE WILL DESTROY THE LANDSCAPE FOLLOWING   THE EASIER PATH OF TRAVEL. PREVIOUS COMMENT: SIDEWALK   ON EAST SIDE OF 3RD STREET SHALL FOLLOW THE CURB   ALIGNMENT.   6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE UPDATE SHEET A-03 TO   REFLECT CHANGES ALONG ROSEMARY. PREVIOUS COMMENT:   PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING ALONG ROSEMARY WILL NOT BE   POSSIBLE, PLEASE REMOVE PROPOSED STRIPING.   7. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PREPARE SOME CROSS SECTIONS   FOR 2ND STREET AND 3RD STREET.   8. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE JUSTIFY WHY THE FDC ON 2ND   STREET CANNOT BE WALL MOUNTED. IF IT CANNOT BE WALL   MOUNTED IT SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE LANDSCAPE AREA   AND NOT ON THE SIDEWALK. PREVIOUS COMMENT: IF POSSIBLE   FDC SHALL BE WALL MOUNTED.   9. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH ENGINEERING   FOR THE LOCATION OF THE DCDA. VALVE SHALL BE LOCATED   BEHIND THE MINIMUM SETBACK AND SCREENED WITH LANDSCAPE.   PREVIOUS COMMENT: DCDA INDICATED ON 2ND STREET EAST OF   THE PARKING GARAGE IS LISTED TO BE LOCATED UNDERGROUND.   VAULT WILL NOT BE PERMITTED BY THE PUBLIC UTILITIES   DEPARTMENT. NEW DCDA LOCATION SHALL BE BEHIND THE   MINIMUM SETBACK AND SCREENED WITH LANDSCAPE.   10. SATISFIED. PROPOSED EXFILTRATION TRENCH WILL   CONFLICT WITH THE REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL FOR THE   STREET TREE. PLEASE DISCUSS WITH LANDSCAPE PLANNER IF   THE CONTINUOUS PLANTING AREA WILL BE SUFFICIENT FOR   TREES AND THERE IS NO NEED FOR STRUCTURAL SOIL.   11. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE MAXIMUM BUILDING   FOOTPRINT TABLE TO ACCURATELY REFLECT THE REQUIREMENT   FOR PROPERTIES LARGER THAN 80,000SF.   12. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. BIKE STORAGE ALONG 2ND STREET   CANNOT BE COUNTED AS ACTIVE USE. PLEASE REMOVE FROM   CALCULATION. THE STREET FRONTAGE IS CALCULATED   DISCOUNTING THE MINIMUM SETBACKS. PREVIOUS COMMENT:   PLEASE PROVIDE A GRAPHIC TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH   ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENT AS LISTED IN TABLE WITHIN SHEET   A-01.   13. NOT SATISFIED. APPLICANT SUBMITTED FOR A VARIANCE   REQUEST. PREVIOUS COMMENT: CODE REQUIRES AN AVERAGE   UNIT SIZE OF 800SF. PROJECT PROPOSED AVERAGE UNIT SIZE   OF 765SF. A VARIANCE WILL BE NECESSARY IF NOT ADJUSTED   TO MEET REQUIREMENT.   14. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ON THE 2ND FLOOR, THE AREA   LISTED AS OPEN TO BELOW CAN BE DISCOUNTED FORM THE GBA   CALCULATIONS. PREVIOUS COMMENT: THE SQUARE FOOTAGE   TABLE LISTS TRASH WITHIN THE NON-LEASABLE AREA. THE   TRASH CHUTE CAN BE EXCLUDED FROM GBA BUT THE ROOM WHERE   THE TRASH CHUTE IS LOCATED WITHIN EACH FLOOR SHALL BE   COUNTED AS GBA.   15. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADJUST THE TRANSPARENCY   CALCULATION GRAPHIC IN SHEET A-03 TO INDICATE THE 10   FEET MARK AND CONFIRM THE CALCULATION IS BASED ON THAT   DIMENSION. TRANSPARENCY IS ONLY REQUIRED FOR   NON-RESIDENTIAL ACTIVE USES (LOBBY AND COMMERCIAL   SPACE).   16. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE GRAPHIC INFORMATION   TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH PLANAR BREAK, HORIZONTAL   PROJECTIONS AND ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT FOR FACADES   ENCLOSING NON-ACTIVE USES (GARAGE). PREVIOUS COMMENT:   PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH   ALL THE ELEMENTS REQUIRED BY TABLE IV-4 FACADE   ARTICULATION REQUIREMENTS.   17. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE INCORPORATE THE CONDITIONS OF   APPROVAL FROM THE HPB REVIEW AND REDESIGN THE WEST AND   SOUTH PARKING GARAGE FACADES. PREVIOUS COMMENTS:   FURTHER STUDY IS NECESSARY FOR THE WEST ELEVATION AS IT   WILL BE HIGHLY VISIBLE FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THE   PARKING GARAGE FACADES NEED ADDITIONAL WORK TO COMPLY   WITH THE REQUIREMENT FOR ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT OF   NON-ACTIVE USES. THE WEST STAIR CAN INCORPORATE SOME   WINDOWS OR TREATMENT TO IMPROVE THE FACADE. THE PARKING   GARAGE NORTH ELEVATION WILL BE ALSO VISIBLE AND NEED   SOME IMPROVEMENTS.   18. SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED   GROUND SETBACK ON ALL FLOOR PLANS AND THE CONDITIONAL   SETBACK LINE ON EACH OF THE REQUIRED LEVELS. ALSO   CLEARLY INCLUDE THE PROPERTY LINE IN ALL DRAWINGS,   INCLUDING CIVILS AND LANDSCAPE.   19. SATISFIED. IN SHEET A-02 PLEASE REFER TO MAXIMUM   PROPOSED GBA, NOT FAR.   20. NOT SATISFIED. EASTERN MOST TOWN HOUSE UNIT SHALL   BE SETBACK FOR THE SIDE INTERIOR PROPERTY LINE A   MINIMUM OF 10 FEET. PREVIOUS COMMENT: PLEASE PROVIDE A   SIDE INTERIOR SETBACK FOR THE EAST PROPERTY LINE.   21. SATISFIED. PLEASE LIST THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING   SPACES REQUIRED BY CODE, AND THE TOTAL NUMBER OF BIKE   SPACES REQUIRED BY CODE (WITHIN THE BUILDING FOR   BUILDING TENANTS AT 1/15 PARKING SPACES, AND ALONG THE   STREET FRONTAGE 1/100 LINEAR FEET OF FRONTAGE). THE   TABLE LISTING THE REQUIRED PARKING BY CODE IS NOT   ACCURATE. PLEASE USE PROVISIONS IN SEC 94-111 OF THE   ZLDRS.   22. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE CLEARLY INDICATE IN THE   PARKING GARAGE THE LOCATION OF THE GUEST PARKING AND   THE PARKING FOR THE COMMERCIAL USE. THESE SPACES SHALL   NOT BE LOCATED BEHIND ANY CONTROL GATE.   23. SATISFIED. WHAT IS THE BACK OUT SPACE AT THE GROUND   LEVEL PARKING GARAGE?   24. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE CHECK THE LABELING OF   THE FACADES AS THEY ARE NOT ACCURATE. PREVIOUS COMMENT:   PLEASE LOCATE THE EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN THE BLOCK   THAT ARE NOT PART OF THE PROJECT FOR REFERENCE.   25. SATISFIED. STAFF WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS THE ARCADE   REMOVAL IN RELATION TO POSSIBLE FUTURE TENANTS.   PREVIOUS COMMENT: STAFF WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS THE   POSSIBLE RE-DESIGN OF THE RETAIL SPACE ALONG ROSEMARY   AVENUE. ARCADES DO NOT HAVE A RECORD OF SUCCESS FOR   COMMERCIAL SPACES.   26. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE ELEVATIONS TO   REFLECT THE CHANGE TO SWING DOOR FOR RESIDENTIAL WALK   UP UNITS. PREVIOUS COMMENT: WALK UP UNIT DOORS SHALL BE   DESIGNED LIKE FRONT DOORS AND NOT SLIDERS.   27. NOT SATISFIED. THE GARAGE ELEVATION NEEDS   ENHANCEMENT TO COMPLY WITH THE PROVISION OF   ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT FOR NON-ACTIVE USES. ENHANCED   DESIGN MAY INCORPORATE SOME OF THE CONDITIONS OF   APPROVAL FROM THE HPB BOARD. PREVIOUS COMMENT: GARAGE   HAS BIG BLANK WALL ALONG 2ND STREET. OPTION COULD BE TO   MOVE THE BIKE STORAGE THERE.   28. NOT SATISFIED. THE GARAGE ELEVATION NEEDS   ENHANCEMENT TO COMPLY WITH THE PROVISION OF   ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT FOR NON-ACTIVE USES. ENHANCED   DESIGN MAY INCORPORATE SOME OF THE CONDITIONS OF   APPROVAL FROM THE HPB BOARD. PREVIOUS COMMENT: GARAGE   ELEVATION ALONG 2ND STREET SHALL INCLUDE ARCHITECTURAL   TREATMENT.   28A SATISFIED. STAFF RECOMMENDS THE SECONDARY ENTRANCE   ON 2ND STREET TO BE HIGHLIGHTED TO BREAK THE CONTINUITY   OF THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS.   29. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ADDITIONAL WORK IS STILL   NECESSARY IN COORDINATION TO THE ARCHITECTURAL   TREATMENT OF THE PARKING GARAGE. PREVIOUS COMMENT: THE   WEST ELEVATION OF THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING SHALL BE   ENHANCED TO PROJECT A GOOD FACADE TOWARDS THE   RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. THE WEST HALLWAY FACADE SHALL   INCORPORATE WINDOWS.   30. SATISFIED. STREETSCAPE DESIGN ALONG ROSEMARY AVENUE   SHALL FOLLOW THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE DANCE INTO THE   SUNSET STREETSCAPE DESIGN.   31. NOT SATISFIED. EXISTING DECORATIVE LIGHTS ALONG 3RD   STREET SHALL BE REPLACED FOR CURRENT DOWNTOWN STANDARD,   AND NEW DECORATIVE FIXTURES SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG   2ND STREET TO MEET THE MINIMUM 0.6 FOOTCANDLE REQUIRED.   ALONG THE ROSEMARY FRONTAGE DECORATIVE LIGHTS MATCHING   THE NEW LIGHT FIXTURES AND POLES BEING INSTALLED BY THE   CITY SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG THE PROJECT FRONTAGE.   PREVIOUS COMMENT: PROJECT IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE   DECORATIVE STREET LIGHT ALONG THE STREET FRONTAGE TO   MEET THE MINIMUM 0.6 FOOT-CANDLES REQUIRED. LIGHT   FIXTURE SHALL MATCH CITY STANDARD.   32. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SEE HPB CONDITIONS OF   APPROVAL. PREVIOUS COMMENT: A PORTION OF THE SITE IS   LOCATED WITHIN THE HISTORIC DISTRICT, THEREFORE HPB   APPROVAL FOR A COA WILL BE REQUIRED. PLEASE CONTACT   FRIEDERIKE MITTNER AT 561-822-1457 TO DISCUSS   REQUIREMENTS FOR SUCH APPLICATION. THE COA SHALL BE   OBTAINED BEFORE PROCEEDING TO DAC FOR SPECIAL REVIEW.   33. ACKNOWLEDGED. DEMOLITION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS ON   SITE CANNOT OCCUR UNTIL BUILDING PERMIT FOR NEW   CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN APPROVED.   34. NOT SATISFIED. TO BE INCLUDED AS A CONDITION IN   SITE PLAN APPROVAL LETTER. PREVIOUS COMMENT: A PROPERTY   RE-PLAT WILL BE REQUIRED.   35. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. AN APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED   ON NOVEMBER 12, 2020. STAFF STARTED THE PROCESS FOR THE   ALLEY ABANDONMENT AND WILL NOTIFY THE APPLICANT IF   ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NEEDED. REQUEST WILL GO THE   DAC AT THE SAME TIME THAN THE SPECIAL REVIEW, AND TO   CITY COMMISSION AFTER THAT. STAFF HAS DETERMINED THE   OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT HAS BEEN MET BY THE PROJECT   THROUGH THE ADDITIONAL PRIVATE OPEN SPACE PROVIDED. A   WAIVER WILL NOT BE NECESSARY. PREVIOUS COMMENT: AN   APPLICATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR THE ALLEY   ABANDONMENT. THE ALLEY ABANDONMENT REQUIRES THAT A   PUBLIC OPEN SPACE EQUIVALENT TO THE AREA OF THE   ABANDONED ALLEY BE ALLOCATED ON SITE. ALLEY AREA = 15   X500=7,500SF. PLEASE INDICATE IF A PUBLIC OPEN SPACE   EQUAL TO 7,500 SF CAN BE LOCATED ON SITE. IF NOT, A   WAIVER OF SUCH PROVISION SHALL BE REQUESTED TO THE CITY   COMMISSION AS PART OF THE ALLEY ABANDONMENT PROCESS. IS   THERE ANY POSSIBILITY TO PROVIDE ANY PUBLIC OPEN SPACE   ON SITE TO COMPLY WITH THE ALLEY ABANDONMENT PROVISION?   SMALLER THAN THE REQUIRED?   36. SATISFIED. HAS THE PROPERTY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF   THE ALLEY (NOT PART OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT) CONFIRMED   SUPPORT FOR ALLEY ABANDONMENT?   37. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE PROJECT REQUIRES DAC   APPROVAL FOR SPECIAL REVIEW. IN PREPARATION FOR THE   DAC, PLEASE PROVIDE COLORED ELEVATIONS IN CONTEXT FOR   DAC SPECIAL REVIEW, MORE DETAILED COLORED ELEVATIONS   WITH CALL OUT MATERIALS AND PICTURES OF PROPOSED   MATERIALS, AND STREET LEVEL RENDERS.   38. ACKNOWLEDGED. EASEMENTS WILL BE INCLUDED IN   RE-PLAT. PREVIOUS COMMENT: PROJECT WILL BE REQUIRED TO   PROVIDE A SIDEWALK ACCESS EASEMENT FOR THE SIDEWALK   LOCATED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY.   39. ACKNOWLEDGED. PROJECT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE   MAINTENANCE OF ALL HARDSCAPE AND LANDSCAPE INSTALLED   WITHIN THE ROW AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. A MAINTENANCE   AGREEMENT SHALL BE SIGNED BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE   DEVELOPER BEFORE FINAL CO.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:   40. PLEASE CORRECT THE PARKING TABLE TO REFLECT THE   ACCURATE PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR RETAIL WITHIN THIS   DISTRICT AS FOLLOWS: MIN-1/1,000SF; MAX 2/1,000SF.   41. PLEASE RELOCATE AT LEAST TWO OF THE BIKE PARKING AT   THE PEDESTRIAN EXIT ON 3RD STREET TO THE ROSEMARY   AVENUE FRONTAGE, IN FRONT OF RETAIL AREA.   42. PLEASE DISCUSS WITH ENGINEERING DEPT THE   POSSIBILITY TO REDUCE THE PARKING SPACES TO 8 FEET   INCLUDING THE GUTTER. THAT WILL ALLOW ONE ADDITIONAL   FOOT TO THE AREA IN FRONT OF THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS ON   3RD STREET AND PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PRIVACY FOR THE FIRST   FLOOR UNITS. IN ADDITION, THE PLANTING AREA NEXT TO THE   CURB CAN BE REDUCED TO 4 FEET IN WIDTH, ALSO PROVIDING   ONE ADDITIONAL FOOT THAT CAN BE INCORPORATED WITHIN THE   FRONT YARD OF THE FIRST FLOOR RESIDENTIAL UNITS ON 3RD   STREET.   43. PLEASE REDUCE THE PARKING GARAGE ENTRANCE FROM   SAPODILLA AVE AND 2ND STREET TO 20 FEET IN TOTAL WIDTH.   44. THE PLANTING AREA NEXT TO THE CURB ALONG 3RD STREET   MAY BE REDUCE TO 4 FEET IN WIDTH. THE SIDEWALK CAN BE   MOVED 1 FOOT NORTH AND THE ADDITIONAL FOOT SHALL BE   ALLOCATED TO THE FRONT PLATING AREA OF THE RESIDENTIAL   UNITS.   FOR RESUBMITTAL PLEASE PROVIDE ONE COPY OF THE   DRAWINGS, RESPONSE LETTER AND ANY OTHER REQUIRED   SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION, AND ONE CD WITH ELECTRONIC   COPIES OF ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED.   TO CONTINUE THE PROCESS TO THE DAC FOR SPECIAL REVIEW   AND VARIANCE APPROVAL AT THE JANUARY 13, 2021 MEETING,   REVISED DRAWINGS WERE REQUIRED BY DECEMBER 8, 2020.   CONSIDERING THE EXPEDITED REQUEST BY THE APPLICANT   STAFF WILL ACCEPT REVISED DRAWING AS LATE AS WEDNESDAY   DECEMBER 23RD, 2020. IF REVISED DRAWINGS ARE NOT   RECEIVED BY THE DECEMBER 23, 2020 EXTENDED DEADLINE THE   CASE WILL BE CONTINUED TO THE FEBRUARY 10, 2021   MEETING.         Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-27-2020 Cont ID   Sent By aaponte Date 10-27-2020 Time 16:36 Rev Time 0.00 Received By aaponte Date 10-27-2020 Time 16:36 Sent To   Notes 2020-10-27 16:38:29 1. ON SHEET A-01 PLEASE CREATE A SITE DATA TABLE THAT   INCLUDES THE THREE DIFFERENT ZONING DESIGNATION ON   SITE, THE AREA OF EACH, THE CORRESPONDING BASE FAR AND   RESULTING GBA ALLOWED BY RIGHT, AND THE ADDITIONAL FAR   AND GBA ALLOWED WITH INCENTIVES FOR EACH BASE ZONING.   THIS TABLE WILL LIST THE MAXIMUM GBA ALLOWED ON SITE BY   RIGHT AND INCENTIVES. TABLE ALSO NEEDS TO INCLUDE THE   PROPOSED GSF AND THE AMOUNT OF TDRS NEEDED FOR THE   PROJECT.   2. SURVEY AND CIVIL DRAWING SHALL INDICATE THE EXISTING   CURB ACROSS STREET AND DIMENSION THE EXISTING TRAVEL   LANES AFTER CHANGES.   3. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE EXISTING CURB   AND THE PROPOSED LOCATION, IF CHANGED.   4. WHAT IS THE WIDTH OF THE TRAVEL LANES ON 2ND STREET?   IS IT CHANGE FROM CURRENT?   5. SIDEWALK ON EAST SIDE OF 3RD STREET SHALL FOLLOW THE   CURB ALIGNMENT.   6. PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING ALONG ROSEMARY WILL NOT   BE POSSIBLE, PLEASE REMOVE PROPOSED STRIPING.   7. PLEASE PREPARE SOME CROSS SECTIONS FOR 2ND STREET   AND 3RD STREET.   8. IF POSSIBLE FDC SHALL BE WALL MOUNTED.   9. DCDA INDICATED ON 2ND STREET EAST OF THE PARKING   GARAGE IS LISTED TO BE LOCATED UNDERGROUND. VAULT WILL   NOT BE PERMITTED BY THE PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT.   NEW DCDA LOCATION SHALL BE BEHIND THE MINIMUM SETBACK   AND SCREENED WITH LANDSCAPE.   10. PROPOSED EXFILTRATION TRENCH WILL CONFLICT WITH THE   REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL FOR THE STREET TREE. PLEASE   DISCUSS WITH LANDSCAPE PLANNER IF THE CONTINUOUS   PLANTING AREA WILL BE SUFFICIENT FOR TREES AND THERE IS   NO NEED FOR STRUCTURAL SOIL.   11. PLEASE CORRECT THE MAXIMUM BUILDING FOOTPRINT TABLE   TO ACCURATELY REFLECT THE REQUIREMENT FOR PROPERTIES   LARGER THAN 80,000SF.   12. PLEASE PROVIDE A GRAPHIC TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH   ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENT AS LISTED IN TABLE WITHIN SHEET   A-01.   13. CODE REQUIRES AN AVERAGE UNIT SIZE OF 800SF.   PROJECT PROPOSED AVERAGE UNIT SIZE OF 765SF. A VARIANCE   WILL BE NECESSARY IF NOT ADJUSTED TO MEET REQUIREMENT.   14. SQUARE FOOTAGE TABLE LISTS TRASH WITHIN THE   NON-LEASABLE AREA. THE TRASH CHUTE CAN BE EXCLUDED FROM   GBA BUT THE ROOM WHERE THE TRASH CHUTE IS LOCATED   WITHIN EACH FLOOR SHALL BE COUNTED AS GBA.   15. PLEASE ADJUST THE TRANSPARENCY CALCULATION GRAPHIC   IN SHEET A-03 TO INDICATE THE 10 FEET MARK AND CONFIRM   THE CALCULATION IS BASED ON THAT DIMENSION.   TRANSPARENCY IS ONLY REQUIRED FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL   ACTIVE USES (LOBBY AND COMMERCIAL SPACE).   16. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE   WITH ALL THE ELEMENTS REQUIRED BY TABLE IV-4 FA?ADE   ARTICULATION REQUIREMENTS.   17. FURTHER STUDY IS NECESSARY FOR THE WEST ELEVATION   AS IT WILL BE HIGHLY VISIBLE FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THE   PARKING GARAGE FACADES NEED ADDITIONAL WORK TO COMPLY   WITH THE REQUIREMENT FOR ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT OF   NON-ACTIVE USES. THE WEST STAIR CAN INCORPORATE SOME   WINDOWS OR TREATMENT TO IMPROVE THE FA?ADE. THE PARKING   GARAGE NORTH ELEVATION WILL BE ALSO VISIBLE AND NEED   SOME IMPROVEMENTS.   18. PLEASE INDICATE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED GROUND SETBACK   ON ALL FLOOR PLANS AND THE CONDITIONAL SETBACK LINE ON   EACH OF THE REQUIRED LEVELS. ALSO CLEARLY INCLUDE THE   PROPERTY LINE IN ALL DRAWINGS, INCLUDING CIVILS AND   LANDSCAPE.   19. IN SHEET A-02 PLEASE REFER TO MAXIMUM PROPOSED GBA,   NOT FAR.   20. PLEASE PROVIDE A SIDE INTERIOR SETBACK FOR THE EAST   PROPERTY LINE.   21. PLEASE LIST THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES   REQUIRED BY CODE, AND THE TOTAL NUMBER OF BIKE SPACES   REQUIRED BY CODE (WITHIN THE BUILDING FOR BUILDING   TENANTS AT 1/15 PARKING SPACES, AND ALONG THE STREET   FRONTAGE 1/100 LINEAR FEET OF FRONTAGE). THE TABLE   LISTING THE REQUIRED PARKING BY CODE IS NOT ACCURATE.   PLEASE USE PROVISIONS IN SEC 94-111 OF THE ZLDRS.   22. PLEASE CLEARLY INDICATE IN THE PARKING GARAGE THE   LOCATION OF THE GUEST PARKING AND THE PARKING FOR THE   COMMERCIAL USE. THESE SPACES SHALL NOT BE LOCATED   BEHIND ANY CONTROL GATE.   23. WHAT IS THE BACK OUT SPACE AT THE GROUND LEVEL   PARKING GARAGE?   24. PLEASE LOCATE THE EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN THE   BLOCK THAT ARE NOT PART OF THE PROJECT FOR REFERENCE.   25. STAFF WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS THE POSSIBLE RE-DESIGN   OF THE RETAIL SPACE ALONG ROSEMARY AVENUE. ARCADES DO   NOT HAVE A RECORD OF SUCCESS FOR COMMERCIAL SPACES.   26. WALK UP UNIT DOORS SHALL BE DESIGNED LIKE FRONT   DOORS AND NOT SLIDERS.   27. GARAGE HAS BIG BLANK WALL ALONG 2ND STREET. OPTION   COULD BE TO MOVE THE BIKE STORAGE THERE.   28. GARAGE ELEVATION ALONG 2ND STREET SHALL INCLUDE   ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT.   28A STAFF RECOMMENDS THE SECONDARY ENTRANCE ON 2ND   STREET TO BE HIGHLIGHTED TO BREAK THE CONTINUITY OF THE   RESIDENTIALL UNITS.   29. THE WEST ELEVATION OF THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING   SHALL BE ENHANCED TO PROJECT A GOOD FA?ADE TOWARDS THE   RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. THE WEST HALLWAY FA?ADE SHALL   INCORPORATE WINDOWS.   30. STREETSCAPE DESIGN ALONG ROSEMARY AVENUE SHALL   FOLLOW THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE DANCE INTO THE SUNSET   STREETSCAPE DESIGN.   31. PROJECT IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE DECORATIVE STREET   LIGHT ALONG THE STREET FRONTAGE TO MEET THE MINIMUM 0.6   FOOT-CANDLES REQUIRED. LIGHT FIXTURE SHALL MATCH CITY   STANDARD.   32. A PORTION OF THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE   HISTORIC DISTRICT, THEREFORE HPB APPROVAL FOR A COA   WILL BE REQUIRED. PLEASE CONTACT FRIEDERIKE MITTNER AT   561-822-1457 TO DISCUSS REQUIREMENTS FOR SUCH   APPLICATION. THE COA SHALL BE OBTAINED BEFORE   PROCEEDING TO DAC FOR SPECIAL REVIEW.   33. DEMOLITION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS ON SITE CANNOT   OCCUR UNTIL BUILDING PERMIT FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION HAS   BEEN APPROVED.   34. A PROPERTY RE-PLAT WILL BE REQUIRED.   35. AN APPLICATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR THE ALLEY   ABANDONMENT. THE ALLEY ABANDONMENT REQUIRES THAT A   PUBLIC OPEN SPACE EQUIVALENT TO THE AREA OF THE   ABANDONED ALLEY BE ALLOCATED ON SITE. ALLEY AREA = 15   X500=7,500SF. PLEASE INDICATE IF A PUBLIC OPEN SPACE   EQUAL TO 7,500 SF CAN BE LOCATED ON SITE. IF NOT, A   WAIVER OF SUCH PROVISION SHALL BE REQUESTED TO THE CITY   COMMISSION AS PART OF THE ALLEY ABANDONMENT PROCESS. IS   THERE ANY POSSIBILITY TO PROVIDE ANY PUBLIC OPEN SPACE   ON SITE TO COMPLY WITH THE ALLEY ABANDONMENT PROVISION?   SMALLER THAN THE REQUIRED?   36. HAS THE PROPERTY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE ALLEY   (NOT PART OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT) CONFIRMED SUPPORT   FOR ALLEY ABANDONMENT?   37. THE PROJECT REQUIRES DAC APPROVAL FOR SPECIAL   REVIEW. IN PREPARATION FOR THE DAC, PLEASE PROVIDE   COLORED ELEVATIONS IN CONTEXT FOR DAC SPECIAL REVIEW,   MORE DETAILED COLORED ELEVATIONS WITH CALL OUT   MATERIALS AND PICTURES OF PROPOSED MATERIALS, AND   STREET LEVEL RENDERS.   38. PROJECT WILL BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A SIDEWALK   ACCESS EASEMENT FOR THE SIDEWALK LOCATED ON PRIVATE   PROPERTY.   39. PROJECT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF   ALL HARDSCAPE AND LANDSCAPE INSTALLED WITHIN THE ROW AS   PART OF THIS PROJECT. A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT SHALL BE   SIGNED BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE DEVELOPER BEFORE FINAL   CO.   FOR RESUBMITTAL PLEASE PROVIDE ONE COPY OF THE   DRAWINGS, RESPONSE LETTER AND ANY OTHER REQUIRED   SUPPORTED DOCUMENTATION, AND ONE CD WITH ELECTRONIC   COPIES OF ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED.     Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-11-2019 Cont ID   Sent By aaponte Date 12-11-2019 Time 13:19 Rev Time 0.00 Received By aaponte Date 12-11-2019 Time 13:19 Sent To   Notes 2019-12-11 13:20:50 - PROJECT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH CURRENT ZONING   REQUIREMENTS FOR NWD-5, NWD-R-C1, OR NWD-2. THE SITE IS   NOT ZONED NWD-8. THE CITY HAS RETAINED THE SERVICES OF   A CONSULTING FIRM TO STUDY THE AREA AND MAKE   RECOMMENDATIONS ON CHANGES TO THE ZONING REGULATIONS TO   ACCOMMODATE HIGHER INTENSITY DEVELOPMENT COMPATIBLE   WITH THE HISTORIC DISTRICT. ANY CHANGES TO THE CURRENT   ZONING WOULD REQUIRE AND AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE   PLAN AND ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.   - AN APPLICATION FOR THE ALLEY ABANDONMENT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. IF ALLEY IS ABANDONED, THE TOTAL   SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE ALLEY SHALL BE DEDICATED AS A   PUBLIC OPEN SPACE ON SITE, IN ADDITION TO ANY PUBLIC   OPEN SPACE REQUIRED.   - HAS THE PROPERTY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE ALLEY (NOT   PART OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT) CONFIRM SUPPORT FOR ALLEY   ABANDONMENT?   - STREETSCAPE DESIGN ALONG ROSEMARY AVENUE SHALL FOLLOW   THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE DANCE INTO THE SUNSET   STREETSCAPE DESIGN.   - A PORTION OF THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE HISTORIC   DISTRICT, THEREFORE HPB APPROVAL WILL BE REQUIRED.   - DEMOLITION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS ON SITE CANNOT OCCUR   UNITL BUILDING PERMIT FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN   APPROVED.   - A PROPERTY RE-PLAT WILL BE REQUIRED.   FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA   APONTE AT 561-822-1439.       Print Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved