Plan Review Details - Project Z19110010
Plan Review Stops For Project Z19110010
Review Stop AIPP ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-08-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By scwelter Date 04-08-2021 Time 16:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By scwelter Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-04-08 16:25:43PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT:
 IF TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT ARE
 OVER $500,000 IT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC ART
 REQUIREMENT AS PER CITY ORDINANCE.
 SECTION 78-129: ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS,
 INCLUDING NEW CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR
 IMPROVEMENT OF AN EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE TOTAL
 CONSTRUCTION COSTS ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN
 $500,000 ARE SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT.
 OPTION 1: INSTALL ARTWORK ON THE DEVELOPMENT SITE
 VALUED IN AN AMOUNT NOT LESS THAN ONE PERCENT OF THE
 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS; OR
 OPTION 2: CONTRIBUTE AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO 75 PERCENT OF
 ONE PERCENT OF THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR DEPOSIT
 TO THE PUBLIC ART ACCOUNT.
 A COMPLETED PUBLIC ART ASSESSMENT APPLICATION IS
 REQUIRED AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 PLEASE CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER AT [email protected] OR
 561.822.1521 TO OBTAIN AN APPLICATION AND REVIEW THE
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 EMAILED DEVELOPER PUBLIC ART ASSESSMENT 4.08.2021
 IF OPTION 1 MUST SHOW ART SITES ON SITE PLAN.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 09-17-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 09-17-2020 Time 17:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 09-17-2020 Time 17:32 Sent To  
Notes
2020-09-17 17:58:24DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 USING COMMENT NUMBERING SEQUENCE FROM THE 7/8/20
 REVIEW, COMMENT # 4 HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETELY ADDRESSED:
  
 4. NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THE DATA TABLE
 ON SITE PLAN SHEET SP-1 HAS BEEN UPDATED TO SHOW A
 TOTAL OF 529 PARKING SPACES WITH 387 OF THOSE BEING ON
 LOT 4S AND THE OTHER 142 BEING ON LOT 4N. THE DATA
 TABLE STATES THAT 8 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES WILL BE
 PROVIDED ON LOT 4S AND ANOTHER 4 ACCESSIBLE PARKING
 SPACES WILL BE PROVIDED ON LOT 4N. THE STATED INTENTION
 TO PROVIDE 12 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES MEETS THE
 REQUIRED MINIMUM NUMBER REQUIRED HOWEVER, LOOKING AT
 THE SITE PLAN, CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL
 PLANS, NOT ALL 12 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE SHOWN
 ON THE PLANS. THERE ARE 8 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES
 SHOWN IN THE PARKING GARAGE, AND 2 ACCESSIBLE PARKING
 SPACES SHOWN ADJACENT TO THE EXISTING 2-STORY BUILDING
 OFFICE BUILDING ON LOT 4 NORTH. THAT IS A TOTAL OF 10
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES, SO 2 MORE ARE REQUIRED ON
 LOT 4N TO GET TO THE PROPOSED TOTAL OF 12 ACCESSIBLE
 PARKING SPACES. WHEN THE PLANS ARE SUBMITTED FOR
 PERMIT, THE PLANS MUST SHOW THE LOCATION OF ALL
 REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES.
  
  
 THE RESPONSES TO THE REMAINDER OF THE COMMENTS ARE
 NOTED.
  
  
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
2020-08-21 14:29:11 
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-08-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 07-08-2020 Time 19:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 07-08-2020 Time 19:25 Sent To  
Notes
2020-07-08 19:39:13DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. FLOOD ZONE. ACCORDING TO THE ADOPTED FLOOD INSURANCE
 RATE MAPS (FIRMS), THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS IN FLOOD
 ZONE AE, WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 12.7 FT NAVD.
 THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL ASSOCIATED
 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS ETC.) SHALL
 BE 24 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD
 ELEVATION.
  
 3. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 4. NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THE DATA TABLE
 ON SITE PLAN SHEET SP-1 IS NOT CLEAR AS TO HOW MANY
 PARKING SPACES ARE BEING PROVIDED IN TOTAL. IF THE
 TOTAL IS 526 PARKING SPACES THE PROPOSED 9 ACCESSIBLE
 PARKING SPACES ARE NOT ENOUGH. FAIR HOUSING ACT
 REQUIRES 2% OF THE POVIDED PARKING SPACES TO BE
 ACCESSIBLE SO 11 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES WOULD BE
 REQUIRED. ALSO, THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS A-2.1 THROUGH
 A-2.6 ONLY SHOW A TOTAL OF 8 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES.
  
 5. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
 NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
 MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
 BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
 EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
 TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
 OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 6. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 7. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
 CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.
  
 8. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
 AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
 CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
 THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.
  
 9. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
 WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
 HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT
 MICHAEL ORIO, GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494
 1080, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 10. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
 TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE
 ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 12-10-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 12-10-2019 Time 19:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 12-10-2019 Time 19:32 Sent To  
Notes
2019-12-10 19:45:52DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. FLOOD ZONE. ACCORDING TO THE ADOPTED FLOOD INSURANCE
 RATE MAPS (FIRMS), THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS IN FLOOD
 ZONE AE, WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 12.7 FT NAVD.
 THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL ASSOCIATED
 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS ETC.) SHALL
 BE 24 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD
 ELEVATION.
  
 3. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 4. SECOND MEANS OF EGRESS FROM LEVELS 1 THROUGH 5.
 STAIR 1 IS ONE MEANS OF EGRESS TO EXIT LEVELS 2 THROUGH
 5. IS IT THE INTENTION FOR THE SECOND MEANS OF EGRESS
 TO BE THROUGH THE PARKING GARAGE? IF SO, THE ELEVATOR
 LOBBY DOORS TO AND FROM THE PARKING GARAGE SHALL SWING
 IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS. ARE THOSE DOORS ALSO
 INTENDED TO PROVIDE EGRESS FROM THE PARKING GARAGE
 TOWARD STAIR 1, WHICH WOULD REQUIRE THAT THEY ALSO
 SWING IN THE OTHER DIRECTION? FIRE RATED DOORS CANNOT
 SWING IN BOTH DIRECTIONS.
  
 5. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
 NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
 MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
 BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
 EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
 TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
 OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 6. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. IF THERE IS TO BE COOKING IN THE
 CAFE, A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE REQUIRED. PLEASE
 CONTACT JEFFREY ODOMS, UTILITIES O&M SUPERINTENDENT,
 PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT, FATS OILS AND GREASE
 DIVISION, AT (561) 822-2172, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 7. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 8. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
 CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.
  
 9. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
 AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
 CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
 THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.
  
 10. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
 WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
 HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT
 MICHAEL ORIO, GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494
 1080, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 11. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
 TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE
 ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 4 Status P Date 11-05-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By RROSSANO Date 11-05-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 11-05-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-11-05 06:55:48COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJ. COORD., CITY OF WPB
 ENG. SERVICES, [email protected], 561-494-1098:
  
 FOR ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL:
 CALL OUT PIPE MATERIAL AND SIZE FOR PROPOSED WATER TAP.
 SHOW PROFILE OF ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS.
 CONFIRM ALL FRANCHISE UTILITIES ARE SHOWN.
 MOVE BLOW-UP DETAIL CIRCLE OVER PROPOSED
 BACKFLOWS/METERS.
 MOVE METERS OUTSIDE OF SIDEWALK.
  
 COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY OF PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER
 SERVICE AT 561-822-2262 OR [email protected].
 -PROPERTY IS PROPOSED TO HAVE MULTIPLE AREAS WITH
 VARYING WATER USAGE SUCH AS MULTIFAMILY, RETAIL, AND
 OFFICES. WITH THE WAY THE METERED WATER SERVICES ARE
 PROPOSED TO BE SETUP, UTILITY BILLING/USAGE WILL BE FOR
 WHOLE PROPERTY AND NOT CALCULATE THE INDIVIDUAL
 PORTIONS SEPARATELY. WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT WAS
 CONSIDERED BEFORE WATER SERVICES ARE BUILT OUT.
  
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 3 Status F Date 08-21-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 08-21-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 08-21-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-08-27 09:35:12PLEASE PROVIDE CCTV AS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED.
  
 FOLLOWING COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, PUBLIC UTILITIES,
 [email protected], 561-822-2262
  
 FOLLOWUP COMMENTS:
  
 4. CUSTOMER SHOULD CONSIDER INSTALLING PARALLEL
 DOMESTIC BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ON THE DOMESTIC LINE TO
 MINIMIZE WATER OUTAGE DURING BACKFLOW MAINTENANCE.
  
 RESPONSE: PLEASE VERIFY IF THIS IS A REQUIREMENT. DUE
 TO ROOM CONSTRAINTS IT WOULD BE DIFFICULT TO HAVE
 MULTIPLE BACKFLOWS.
  
 -PARALLEL/DUAL INSTALLATION IS NOT A REQUIREMENT ? ONLY
 A RECOMMENDATION BY THE UTILITY. CUSTOMER MAY UTILIZE
 SINGULAR BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY.
  
 NEW COMMENTS:
  
 -DURING FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, CLARIFY ON WATER
 PLAN IF 10?U.E. AT SOUTH SIDE OF PROPERTY CURVES AND
 CONTINUE NORTH ON THE EAST SIDE OF PROPERTY. IF SO,
 PLEASE ADD LABEL ON EAST SIDE.
  
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-07-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 07-07-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 07-07-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-07-07 09:15:49PLEASE UPDATE CIVIL PLANS TO REFLECT RESPONSES IN
 RESPONSE LETTER DATED 12/13/19.
 PLEASE COORDINATE PLACEMENT OF WATER METERS/BACKFLOW
 PREVENTION ETC. WITH MARK HURLEY OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
 CUSTOMER SERVICE AT 561-822-2262 OR [email protected].
  
 FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM HONG XU, PROJECT ENGINEER,
 PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-494-1097, [email protected]:
 PLEASE PROVIDE CHANGE OF LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATION.
 CHANGE THE SCALE TO MAKE SURE ALL THE EXISTING
 UTILITIES (WATER, SEWER, STORM AND DRY UTILITIES) ARE
 SHOWN IN THE PLAN, THE PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL ARE
 CALLED OUT.
  
  
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-05-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 12-05-2019 Time   Rev Time 4.00
Received By rrossano Date 12-05-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-12-05 12:12:14PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM AND PEAK)
 AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PER FAC
 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER.
  
 PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND STORM
 DRAINAGE LINES ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE.
  
 PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY OF
 WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT
 OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF YOUR
 PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
 MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
 IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
 [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER
 ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION
 ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD
 SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.
  
 AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
 MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI
 CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL
  
 PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF
 ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES,
 INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND
 SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES,
 METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE
 SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING
 GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS,
 ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL
 INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER
 LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN
 VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
 ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER
 OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &
 TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 PLEASE LABEL CENTREPARK DR. E.
  
 CITY GIS SHOWS CONTINUOUS 12 IN. DIP WATER MAIN ALONG
 CENTREPARK DR. E. PLANS SHOW EXISTING 8 IN. STUB OUT,
 BUT OUR FILES DO NOT REFLECT AN 8 IN. STUB OUT. PLEASE
 CLARIFY PROPOSED WATER CONNECTION.
  
 PROPOSED CURB WILL ENCROACH ON EXISTING SANITARY
 MANHOLE. AS SUCH, POINT OF SERVICE WILL BE EXISTING
 MANHOLE IN CENTREPARK DR. CONSIDER RUNNING PROPOSED
 SANITARY SERVICE TO EXISTING MANHOLE INSTEAD OF
 PROPOSED NEW MANHOLE.
  
 PLEASE CLEARLY SHOW CITY RIGHTS OF WAY.
  
 PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL UTILITY
 CROSSINGS.
  
 SHOW VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION INFORMATION
 (NAVD 88 AND NGVD 29).
  
 CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY
 ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
 RIGHT OF WAY.
  
 PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE
 DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB
 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION).
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND
 IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED
 AREAS.
  
 ADJUST PROPOSED METER PLACEMENT TO BE WITHIN EASEMENT;
 BACKFLOWS TO BE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY OUTSIDE OF
 EASEMENT.
  
 PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
 PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
  
 PROVIDE ENLARGED DETAIL ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION
 OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION.
  
 PLEASE LABEL ALL POINTS OF SERVICE.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE PER MARK HURLEY, PUBLIC
 UTILITIES CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, 561-822-2262 OR
 [email protected]
  
 -LOOKS LIKE WATER SERVICE PIPING LOCATED ON AND RUNNING
 THROUGH OTHER PRIVATE PROPERTY. COULD BE LEGALLY
 PROBLEMATIC IF OTHER PROPERTY OWNER DOES NOT WANT IT
 THERE. RECOMMEND NOT DOING THAT.
  
 -LOOKS LIKE CUSTOMER PROPOSED PAVER BRICK COMING INTO
 ROW -> NOT SURE IF CUSTOMER ALLOWED TO BUILD INTO ROW.
  
 -LOOKS LIKE CUSTOMER PROPOSED PAVER BRICK BEING BUILT
 WITHIN EXISTING 10? UE ALONG EDGES OF PROPERTY. WOULD
 CREATE USABILITY CONFLICT WITH UE. SOLUTION COULD BE TO
 RELOCATE BRICKWORK BACK AND KEEP AREA GRASSED.
  
 -CUSTOMER SHOULD CONSIDER INSTALLING PARALLEL DOMESTIC
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ON THE DOMESTIC LINE TO MINIMIZE
 WATER OUTAGE DURING BACKFLOW MAINTENANCE.
  
 -THERE ARE SOME EXISTING TREES IN AREA. TREES SHOULD
 NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN 5? OF WATER SERVICE PIPING.
  
 -IF DOMESTIC METER IS 3? OR GREATER, SHOULD BE
 INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND.
  
 -ALL OF WATER METER NEEDS TO BE IN ROW OR UE.
  
 -EXISTING WATER UTILITIES NOT SHOWN CLEARLY. SHOULD
 HAVE SEPARATE UTILITY PLAN SHEET HIGHLIGHTING EXISTING
 UTILITIES, AND AN ENLARGED/ZOOMED-IN AREA PLAN OF THE
 WATER SERVICES IN DETAIL.
  
 -CANNOT FIGURE OUT WHERE THE RETAIL IS LOCATED ->
 SHOULD LABEL ON PLAN.
  
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS.
  
 RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX
 3366, ZIP 33402)
 MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 FAX:
 (561) 494-1116 MOBILE: (561) 246-9525
 EMAIL: [email protected] WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING
  
 MANNY GONZALEZ, SENIOR ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX
 3366, ZIP 33402)
 MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 DIRECT: (561) 494-1085
 FAX: (561) 494-1116 MOBILE: (561) 644-7301 EMAIL:
 [email protected] WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING
  
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 12-06-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 12-06-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 12-06-2019 Time 15:18 Sent To  
Notes
2019-12-06 15:35:00THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
 6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,
 PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,
 INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE
 OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)
  
 7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA
 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE
 BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE
 BEING CONSTRUCTED.
  
 SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED,
 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
 PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
  
 IT IS RECOMMENDED FOR HIGH RISES HAVE TWO SEPARATE FDC
 LOCATIONS REMOTELY LOCATED.
  
 7A. PER NFPA 14
  
 6.4.5.4* FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED
 NOT MORE THAN 100 FT (30.5 M) FROM THE NEAREST FIRE
 HYDRANT CONNECTED TO AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY.
  
  
 7B. PLEASE REVIEW THE DISTANCE SEPARATION OF THE
 STAIRWELLS AS THE SEPARATION DISTANCE IS NOT INDICATED.
  
 7.3.2.2* WHERE THE MOST REMOTE PORTION OF A
 NON-SPRINKLERED FLOOR OR STORY IS LOCATED IN EXCESS OF
 150 FT (45.7 M) OF TRAVEL DISTANCE FROM A HOSE
 CONNECTION IN OR ADJACENT TO A REQUIRED EXIT OR THE
 MOST REMOTE PORTION OF A SPRINKLERED FLOOR OR STORY
 IS LOCATED IN EXCESS OF 200 FT (61 M) OF TRAVEL
 DISTANCE FROM A HOSE CONNECTION IN OR ADJACENT TO A
 REQUIRED EXIT, ADDITIONALHOSE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED, IN APPROVED LOCATIONS, WHERE REQUIRED BY THE
 LOCAL FIRE DEPARTMENT OR THE AHJ.
  
  
 7C. PER NFPA 1
  
 18.3 WATER SUPPLIES.
  
 18.3.1* AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING
 THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE
 PROVIDED TO ALL PREMISES UPON WHICH FACILITIES,
 BUILDINGS, OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS ARE HEREAFTER
 CONSTRUCTED OR MOVED INTO THE JURISDICTION. THE
 APPROVED WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 SECTION 18.4.
  
 PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004,
 FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE
 POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF
 APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT,
 CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR
 AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER
 SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA)
 AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS
 PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS.
 FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE
 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?
  
  
 7D. THE LOCATION OF THE DDCC FIRE LINE LOCATION SHALL
 MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 24 AND SHALL BE
 COORDINATED WITH THE OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY'S
 ENGINEERS OFFICE, THE LANSCAPE PLANNER, AND THE CITY'S
 PLANNING AND ZONING OFFICE.
  
  
 8. A CLASS ?A? NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM
 SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP
 DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND
 APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY
 INSTALLATION.
  
 9. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7
 KEYWAY SYSTEM.
  
 ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S
 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA
 B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.
  
 ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN
 WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL
 LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET
 MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER
 ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN
 AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE
 IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
 EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
 PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
 SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE
 BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND
 FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET
 OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER
 ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES.
  
 12. COMMAND ROOM
 THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1,
 CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN
 THE FOLLOWING FEATURES:
 A. SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 200 FT SQUARED WITH A MINIMUM
 DIMENSION OF 10 FT.
 B. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.
 C. A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
 ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
 D. SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL
 FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF
 EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING
 EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS AND THE LOCATION
 OF FIRE WALLS, FIRE BARRIERS, FIRE PARTITIONS, SMOKE
 BARRIERS AND SMOKE PARTITIONS
 E. A WORK TABLE.
 F. IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
 FOR THE BUILDING.
 G. THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
 CONTROL UNIT.
 H. ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION OF
 THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL
 I. STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR DISTRIBUTION
 SYSTEMS.
 J. CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS SIMULTANEOUSLY
 K. SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY
 PANELS
 L. EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS
 M. FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
 N. GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND
 TRANSFER FEATURES.
 O. PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED
 BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE
 P. CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL
 Q. ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME
 A17.1.
 R. ELEVATOR EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER SELECTOR
 SWITCH(ES), WHERE EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER IS
 PROVIDED
 11.8.6* EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER.
 11.8.6.1 AN EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE PROVIDED
 IN A
 LOCATION APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.
 11.8.6.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL CONTAIN THE
 FOLLOWING:
 (1) VOICE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM PANELS AND CONTROLS
 (2) FIRE DEPARTMENT TWO-WAY TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION
 SERVICE
 PANELS AND CONTROLS WHERE REQUIRED BY ANOTHER SECTION
 OF THIS
 CODE
 (3) FIRE DETECTION AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATION
 PANELS
 (4) ELEVATOR FLOOR LOCATION AND OPERATION ANNUNCIATORS
 (5) ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME
 A17.1/CSA B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS AND ESCALATORS
 (6) ELEVATOR EMERGENCY POWER SELECTOR SWITCH(ES) WHERE
 PROVIDED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME A17.1/CSA B44
 (7) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATERFLOW ANNUNCIATORS
 (8) EMERGENCY GENERATOR STATUS INDICATORS
 (9) CONTROLS FOR ANY AUTOMATIC STAIRWAY DOOR UNLOCKING
 SYSTEM
 (10) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
 (11) TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
 ACCESS TO THE
 PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
 (12) STAIRWAY VIDEO MONITORING EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED BY
 11.8.8
  
  
 12A. THE COMMAND ROOM IS INDICATED IN A LOCATION REMOTE
 FROM THE FIRE PUMP ROOM AND WITH NO DIRECT ACCESS TO
 THE LOBBY.
  
 PLEASE REVIEW AND COORDINATE WITH THE OFFICE OF THE
 FIRE MARSHAL TO PROVIDE A LOCATION CLOSER TO THE FIRE
 PUMP ROOM AND HAVE ACCESS TO THE LOBBY EVEN IF TWO
 DOORS ARE NEEDED.
  
  
 13. RADIO
 NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY
 RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.
 11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM
 RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
 COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL
 DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.
 NFPA 72, 24.5.2* TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS
 ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS.
 24.5.2.2 RADIO COVERAGE. RADIO COVERAGE SHALL BE
 PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE BUILDING AS A PERCENTAGE OF
 FLOOR AREA AS SPECIFIED IN 24.5.2.2.1 THROUGH
 24.5.2.2.3.
 24.5.2.2.1 CRITICAL AREAS. CRITICAL AREAS, SUCH AS THE
 EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER(S), THE FIRE PUMP ROOM(S),
 EXIT STAIRS, EXIT PASSAGEWAYS, ELEVATOR LOBBIES,
 STANDPIPE CABINETS, SPRINKLER SECTIONAL VALVE
 LOCATIONS, AND OTHER AREAS DEEMED CRITICAL BY THE
 AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH
 99 PERCENT FLOOR AREA RADIO COVERAGE.
 24.5.2.2.2 GENERAL BUILDING AREAS. GENERAL BUILDING
 AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH 90 PERCENT FLOOR AREA
 RADIO COVERAGE.
 24.5.2.3 SIGNAL STRENGTH.
 24.5.2.3.1 INBOUND. A MINIMUM INBOUND SIGNAL STRENGTH
 OF -95 DBM, OR OTHER SIGNAL STRENGTH AS REQUIRED BY THE
 AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL BE PROVIDED
 THROUGHOUT THE COVERAGE AREA.
 24.5.2.3.2 OUTBOUND. A MINIMUM OUTBOUND SIGNAL STRENGTH
 OF -95 DBM AT THE DONOR SITE, OR OTHER SIGNAL STRENGTH
 AS REQUIRED BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL
 BE PROVIDED FROM THE COVERAGE AREA.
  
 THE SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL
 STRENGTH OF -95 DBM FOR THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST
 PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE. TESTING SHALL BE BY AN
 ACCEPTABLE NATIONAL STANDARD DOCUMENTING PERCENTAGES
 NOTED ABOVE AND BY ACTUAL RADIO TESTING BY FIRE
 PERSONNEL. IF THE MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A
 BI-DIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH
 A MINIMUM 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP.
  
 14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 BUILDING.
 ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS,
 PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 15. THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA
 101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE PROTECTION
 EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING:
 THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED,
 INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204,
 STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY
 RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR
 RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY
 HAVING JURISDICTION.
 THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE
 INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE
 APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED
 MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE
 SYSTEM.
 ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL
 INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.9.
  
 16. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 17. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 11-16-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 11-16-2020 Time 13:41 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 11-16-2020 Time 13:41 Sent To  
Notes
2020-11-16 13:42:23FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 1885 CENTREPARK Z19110010
 NOVEMBER 16, 2020
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
 EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
 POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE CONDITION AND RELOCATION
 POTENTIAL FOR THE SEVEN LIVE OAKS, ONE GUMBO LIMBO, AND
 ONE SILVER BUTTONWOOD LISTED IN THE TREE DISPOSITION
 PLAN.
 CONDITION NOT LISTED FOR THE REFERENCED NATIVE TREES.
 CONDITIONS OF TREES ARE LISTED BUT STAFF REQUESTS THE
 QUALIFIED ARBORISTS REPORT WITH THE REFERENCED ANSI A
 300 (PART 5) TREE RELOCATION STANDARDS USED.
  
 2. SATISFIED. ON THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CHART,
 CORRECT THE SITE LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THE
 SHADE TREE AND FLOWERING TREE CALCULATIONS BASED ON 40
 PERCENT REQUIRED OPEN SPACE PER CPD ZONING, AND THEN
 ADD THE MULTIFAMILY 220 TREES TO ACHIEVE THE TOTAL
 TREES REQUIRED. THEN SHOW PROVIDED NUMBER OF TREES ON
 SITE. ONCE ANY TREE PLANTING PLAN FOR THE POA PARCELS
 HAS BEEN FINALIZED AND SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW, THE FINAL
 COUNT OF DEFICIENT TREES SHALL BE DETERMINED.
 CORRECT CALCULATIONS AS REQUESTED TO ONLY SHOW REQUIRED
 TREE CALCULATIONS. IN THE PROVIDED SECTION SHOW TOTAL
 TREES AND QUALIFYING PALMS FOR ONSITE INCLUDING
 ROOFTOP. SHOW NUMBER OF TREES DEFICIENT AND TOTAL
 PROVIDED FOR STREETSCAPE AND OFFSITE PROVIDED TO OFFSET
 THE DEFICIENT NUMBER.
  
 CALCULATIONS CAN BE SIMPLIFIED TO BE CLEAR. REQUIRED
 SHADE TREE NUMBER IS 27, REQUIRED FLOWERING TREES IS 7,
 AND MULTIFAMILY IS 220. TOTAL REQUIRED IS 254.
 PROVIDED APPEARS TO BE ON SITE 66, ROOFTOP 6,
 STREETSCAPE 36, AND POA PROPERTY 19.
 TOTAL IS 127. THIS LEAVES A DEFICIT OF 127 TREES.
 THE OFFSITE PARKING LOT IS 6 NEW TREES, BUT THERE IS
 MITIGATION REQUIRED AND POSSIBLY MISSING REQUIRED TREES
 ON THAT PARCEL. ANY TREES ABOVE THE REQUIRED MAY BE
 COUNTED AS ?EXTRA? AND PROPOSED TO BE APPLIED TOWARD
 THE WAIVED NUMBER OF TREES.
 PAYMENT IN LIEU IS AN OPTION FOR THE WAIVED TREES.
  
 3. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
 PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
 MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES BY SHOWING THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE.
 NUMBER OF QUALIFYING PLANTS SHOWN, BUT STILL NEED
 PERCENTAGE LISTED.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER, SEWER,
 FIRE LINES, DRAINAGE LINES AND FPL TRANSFORMERS ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING
 WHEN CIVIL DRAWINGS ARE FINALIZED.
 CONFLICTS WITH REQUIRED LANDSCAPING STILL EXIST.
  
 WILL VERIFY FINAL DESIGN LOCATIONS PRIOR TO FINAL
 APPROVAL.
  
 5. SATISFIED. GREEN BUTTONWOOD TREES AND ROYAL PALMS
 SHOWN IN THE PAVED PLAZA AREAS NEED TO HAVE STRUCTURAL
 SOIL OR SOIL CELLS UNDER THE PAVED AREA TO ALLOW FOR
 ROOT DEVELOPMENT. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND CROSS SECTION
 DETAIL FOR THE TYPE SELECTED.
  
 6. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING
 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH
 TREES.
  
 7. SATISFIED. SHOW THE OFFSITE TREES RELATED TO THE
 RECONFIGURATION OF THE EXISTING PARKING AREA AS A
 SEPARATE PLAN AND PLANT LIST. ADDRESS ALL MISSING
 PARKING AREA TREES IN TERMINAL ISLANDS.
 THIS IS A SEPARATE PARCEL, SO WILL REQUIRE AND
 AMENDMENT TO THAT PARCEL?S APPROVED SITE PLAN AND
 LANDSCAPE PLAN. PLACEMENT OF UTILITY LINES FOR THE
 PROPOSED SITE WITHIN THIS PARKING AREA CREATES
 NONCONFORMING LANDSCAPE AREAS BY DISPLACING REQUIRED
 TREES.
 SEPARATE PLAN NEEDS TO BE SUBMITTED.
 THE FIRE AND WATER SUPPLY LINES AND BACKFLOWS ARE
 PROPOSED OFF SITE IN A REQUIRED PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE
 AREA. PROVIDE A SEPARATE PLAN SHOWING THE LANDSCAPING
 MEETING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE OFFSITE PARKING AREA.
  
 SIDEWALKS ADDED THROUGH THE TERMINAL AND INTERIOR
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS INCREASE OR CREATE NONCONFORMITIES.
 THESE AREAS MUST REMAIN UNALTERED OR BECOME MORE
 CONFORMING. THE DIFFERENCE IN LANDSCAPE AREA SQUARE
 FOOTAGE MUST ALSO BE SHOWN. IF IT STAYS THE SAME OR IS
 INCREASED EVEN SLIGHTLY, NO FURTHER ACTION WOULD BE
 REQUIRED.
  
 RESOLUTION NO. 97-17
  
 8. ONGOING. PER EXHIBIT F, APPROVAL FROM THE
 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE
 LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PROPOSED.
 FINAL PLAN MUST BE APPROVED.
 IT MUST BE VERIFIED THAT THE POA WILL ACCEPT AND
 MAINTAIN THE LANDSCAPING AND TREES ADDED TO THE COMMON
 AREAS.
  
 9. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATION OF PUMP EQUIPMENT AND
 SOURCE FOR THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO MEET CONDITION #11
 REQUIRING USE OF SURFACE WATER FROM LAKES.
 COULD NOT LOCATE NOTE OR CALL OUT FOR IRRIGATION PUMP
 ON LANDSCAPE PLAN.
 COMMENT RESPONSE WAS NOT CLEAR.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 08-27-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 08-27-2020 Time 15:21 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 08-27-2020 Time 15:21 Sent To  
Notes
2020-08-27 15:21:49FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 1885 CENTREPARK Z19110010
 AUGUST 27, 2020
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES
 NATIVE TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE
 OR RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
 EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
 POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE CONDITION AND RELOCATION
 POTENTIAL FOR THE SEVEN LIVE OAKS, ONE GUMBO LIMBO, AND
 ONE SILVER BUTTONWOOD LISTED IN THE TREE DISPOSITION
 PLAN.
 CONDITION NOT LISTED FOR THE REFERENCED NATIVE TREES.
 CONDITIONS OF TREES ARE LISTED BUT STAFF REQUESTS THE
 QUALIFIED ARBORISTS REPORT WITH THE REFERENCED ANSI A
 300 (PART 5) TREE RELOCATION STANDARDS USED.
  
 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ON THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS
 CHART, CORRECT THE SITE LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW
 THE SHADE TREE AND FLOWERING TREE CALCULATIONS BASED ON
 40 PERCENT REQUIRED OPEN SPACE PER CPD ZONING, AND THEN
 ADD THE MULTIFAMILY 220 TREES TO ACHIEVE THE TOTAL
 TREES REQUIRED. THEN SHOW PROVIDED NUMBER OF TREES ON
 SITE. ONCE ANY TREE PLANTING PLAN FOR THE POA PARCELS
 HAS BEEN FINALIZED AND SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW, THE FINAL
 COUNT OF DEFICIENT TREES SHALL BE DETERMINED.
 CORRECT CALCULATIONS AS REQUESTED TO ONLY SHOW REQUIRED
 TREE CALCULATIONS. IN THE PROVIDED SECTION SHOW TOTAL
 TREES AND QUALIFYING PALMS FOR ONSITE INCLUDING
 ROOFTOP. SHOW NUMBER OF TREES DEFICIENT AND TOTAL
 PROVIDED FOR STREETSCAPE AND OFFSITE PROVIDED TO OFFSET
 THE DEFICIENT NUMBER.
  
 CALCULATIONS CAN BE SIMPLIFIED TO BE CLEAR. REQUIRED
 SHADE TREE NUMBER IS 27, REQUIRED FLOWERING TREES IS 7,
 AND MULTIFAMILY IS 220. TOTAL REQUIRED IS 254.
 PROVIDED APPEARS TO BE ON SITE 66, ROOFTOP 6,
 STREETSCAPE 36, AND POA PROPERTY 19.
 TOTAL IS 127. THIS LEAVES A DEFICIT OF 127 TREES.
 THE OFFSITE PARKING LOT IS 6 NEW TREES, BUT THERE IS
 MITIGATION REQUIRED AND POSSIBLY MISSING REQUIRED TREES
 ON THAT PARCEL. ANY TREES ABOVE THE REQUIRED MAY BE
 COUNTED AS ?EXTRA? AND PROPOSED TO BE APPLIED TOWARD
 THE WAIVED NUMBER OF TREES.
 PAYMENT IN LIEU IS AN OPTION FOR THE WAIVED TREES.
  
 3. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
 PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
 MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES BY SHOWING THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE.
 NUMBER OF QUALIFYING PLANTS SHOWN, BUT STILL NEED
 PERCENTAGE LISTED.
  
 4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER,
 SEWER, FIRE LINES, DRAINAGE LINES AND FPL TRANSFORMERS
 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH
 LANDSCAPING WHEN CIVIL DRAWINGS ARE FINALIZED.
 CONFLICTS WITH REQUIRED LANDSCAPING STILL EXIST.
  
 WILL VERIFY FINAL DESIGN LOCATIONS PRIOR TO FINAL
 APPROVAL.
  
 5. SATISFIED. GREEN BUTTONWOOD TREES AND ROYAL PALMS
 SHOWN IN THE PAVED PLAZA AREAS NEED TO HAVE STRUCTURAL
 SOIL OR SOIL CELLS UNDER THE PAVED AREA TO ALLOW FOR
 ROOT DEVELOPMENT. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND CROSS SECTION
 DETAIL FOR THE TYPE SELECTED.
  
 6. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING
 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH
 TREES.
  
 7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW THE OFFSITE TREES RELATED
 TO THE RECONFIGURATION OF THE EXISTING PARKING AREA AS
 A SEPARATE PLAN AND PLANT LIST. ADDRESS ALL MISSING
 PARKING AREA TREES IN TERMINAL ISLANDS.
 THIS IS A SEPARATE PARCEL, SO WILL REQUIRE AND
 AMENDMENT TO THAT PARCEL?S APPROVED SITE PLAN AND
 LANDSCAPE PLAN. PLACEMENT OF UTILITY LINES FOR THE
 PROPOSED SITE WITHIN THIS PARKING AREA CREATES
 NONCONFORMING LANDSCAPE AREAS BY DISPLACING REQUIRED
 TREES.
 SEPARATE PLAN NEEDS TO BE SUBMITTED.
 THE FIRE AND WATER SUPPLY LINES AND BACKFLOWS ARE
 PROPOSED OFF SITE IN A REQUIRED PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE
 AREA. PROVIDE A SEPARATE PLAN SHOWING THE LANDSCAPING
 MEETING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE OFFSITE PARKING AREA.
  
 SIDEWALKS ADDED THROUGH THE TERMINAL AND INTERIOR
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS INCREASE OR CREATE NONCONFORMITIES.
 THESE AREAS MUST REMAIN UNALTERED OR BECOME MORE
 CONFORMING. THE DIFFERENCE IN LANDSCAPE AREA SQUARE
 FOOTAGE MUST ALSO BE SHOWN. IF IT STAYS THE SAME OR IS
 INCREASED EVEN SLIGHTLY, NO FURTHER ACTION WOULD BE
 REQUIRED.
  
 RESOLUTION NO. 97-17
  
 8. ONGOING. PER EXHIBIT F, APPROVAL FROM THE
 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE
 LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PROPOSED.
 FINAL PLAN MUST BE APPROVED.
 IT MUST BE VERIFIED THAT THE POA WILL ACCEPT AND
 MAINTAIN THE LANDSCAPING AND TREES ADDED TO THE COMMON
 AREAS.
  
 9. NOT SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATION OF PUMP EQUIPMENT AND
 SOURCE FOR THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO MEET CONDITION #11
 REQUIRING USE OF SURFACE WATER FROM LAKES.
 COULD NOT LOCATE NOTE OR CALL OUT FOR IRRIGATION PUMP
 ON LANDSCAPE PLAN.
 COMMENT RESPONSE WAS NOT CLEAR.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-07-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 07-07-2020 Time 17:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 07-07-2020 Time 17:13 Sent To  
Notes
2020-07-07 17:13:59FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 1885 CENTREPARK Z19110010
 JULY 7, 2020
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. NOT SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. ANSI A 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY
 EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR
 POOR FOR RELOCATION. PROVIDE CONDITION AND RELOCATION
 POTENTIAL FOR THE SEVEN LIVE OAKS, ONE GUMBO LIMBO, AND
 ONE SILVER BUTTONWOOD LISTED IN THE TREE DISPOSITION
 PLAN.
 CONDITION NOT LISTED FOR THE REFERENCED NATIVE TREES.
  
 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ON THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS
 CHART, CORRECT THE SITE LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW
 THE SHADE TREE AND FLOWERING TREE CALCULATIONS BASED ON
 40 PERCENT REQUIRED OPEN SPACE PER CPD ZONING, AND THEN
 ADD THE MULTIFAMILY 220 TREES TO ACHIEVE THE TOTAL
 TREES REQUIRED. THEN SHOW PROVIDED NUMBER OF TREES ON
 SITE. ONCE ANY TREE PLANTING PLAN FOR THE POA PARCELS
 HAS BEEN FINALIZED AND SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW, THE FINAL
 COUNT OF DEFICIENT TREES SHALL BE DETERMINED.
 CORRECT CALCULATIONS AS REQUESTED TO ONLY SHOW REQUIRED
 TREE CALCULATIONS. IN THE PROVIDED SECTION SHOW TOTAL
 TREES AND QUALIFYING PALMS FOR ONSITE INCLUDING
 ROOFTOP. SHOW NUMBER OF TREES DEFICIENT AND TOTAL
 PROVIDED FOR STREETSCAPE AND OFFSITE PROVIDED TO OFFSET
 THE DEFICIENT NUMBER.
  
 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF
 PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES BY SHOWING THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE.
 NUMBER OF QUALIFYING PLANTS SHOWN, BUT STILL NEED
 PERCENTAGE LISTED.
  
 4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER,
 SEWER, FIRE LINES, DRAINAGE LINES AND FPL TRANSFORMERS
 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH
 LANDSCAPING WHEN CIVIL DRAWINGS ARE FINALIZED.
 CONFLICTS WITH REQUIRED LANDSCAPING STILL EXIST.
  
 5. SATISFIED. GREEN BUTTONWOOD TREES AND ROYAL PALMS
 SHOWN IN THE PAVED PLAZA AREAS NEED TO HAVE STRUCTURAL
 SOIL OR SOIL CELLS UNDER THE PAVED AREA TO ALLOW FOR
 ROOT DEVELOPMENT. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND CROSS SECTION
 DETAIL FOR THE TYPE SELECTED.
  
 6. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING
 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH
 TREES.
  
 7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW THE OFFSITE TREES RELATED
 TO THE RECONFIGURATION OF THE EXISTING PARKING AREA AS
 A SEPARATE PLAN AND PLANT LIST. ADDRESS ALL MISSING
 PARKING AREA TREES IN TERMINAL ISLANDS.
 THIS IS A SEPARATE PARCEL, SO WILL REQUIRE AND
 AMENDMENT TO THAT PARCEL?S APPROVED SITE PLAN AND
 LANDSCAPE PLAN. PLACEMENT OF UTILITY LINES FOR THE
 PROPOSED SITE WITHIN THIS PARKING AREA CREATES
 NONCONFORMING LANDSCAPE AREAS BY DISPLACING REQUIRED
 TREES.
 SEPARATE PLAN NEEDS TO BE SUBMITTED.
 THE FIRE AND WATER SUPPLY LINES AND BACKFLOWS ARE
 PROPOSED OFF SITE IN A REQUIRED PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE
 AREA. PROVIDE A SEPARATE PLAN SHOWING THE LANDSCAPING
 MEETING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE OFFSITE PARKING AREA.
  
 RESOLUTION NO. 97-17
  
 8. ONGOING. PER EXHIBIT F, APPROVAL FROM THE
 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE
 LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PROPOSED.
 FINAL PLAN MUST BE APPROVED.
  
 9. NOT SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATION OF PUMP EQUIPMENT AND
 SOURCE FOR THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO MEET CONDITION #11
 REQUIRING USE OF SURFACE WATER FROM LAKES.
 COULD NOT LOCATE NOTE OR CALL OUT FOR IRRIGATION PUMP
 ON LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-10-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 12-10-2019 Time 17:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 12-10-2019 Time 17:24 Sent To  
Notes
2019-12-10 17:25:39FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 1885 CENTREPARK Z19110010
 DECEMBER 10, 2019
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES IN GOOD
 CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. ANSI A
 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF SUITABILITY
 RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR POOR FOR RELOCATION.
 PROVIDE CONDITION AND RELOCATION POTENTIAL FOR THE
 SEVEN LIVE OAKS, ONE GUMBO LIMBO, AND ONE SILVER
 BUTTONWOOD LISTED IN THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN.
  
 2. ON THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CHART, CORRECT THE
 SITE LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THE SHADE TREE AND
 FLOWERING TREE CALCULATIONS BASED ON 40 PERCENT
 REQUIRED OPEN SPACE PER CPD ZONING, AND THEN ADD THE
 MULTIFAMILY 220 TREES TO ACHIEVE THE TOTAL TREES
 REQUIRED. THEN SHOW PROVIDED NUMBER OF TREES ON SITE.
 ONCE ANY TREE PLANTING PLAN FOR THE POA PARCELS HAS
 BEEN FINALIZED AND SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW, THE FINAL
 COUNT OF DEFICIENT TREES SHALL BE DETERMINED.
  
 3. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT
 SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL
 ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT
 SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF
 SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA
 WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA
 LANDSCAPES BY SHOWING THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE.
  
 4. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER, SEWER, FIRE LINES,
 DRAINAGE LINES AND FPL TRANSFORMERS ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING WHEN CIVIL
 DRAWINGS ARE FINALIZED.
  
 5. GREEN BUTTONWOOD TREES AND ROYAL PALMS SHOWN IN THE
 PAVED PLAZA AREAS NEED TO HAVE STRUCTURAL SOIL OR SOIL
 CELLS UNDER THE PAVED AREA TO ALLOW FOR ROOT
 DEVELOPMENT. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND CROSS SECTION DETAIL
 FOR THE TYPE SELECTED.
  
 6. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH TREES.
  
 7. SHOW THE OFFSITE TREES RELATED TO THE
 RECONFIGURATION OF THE EXISTING PARKING AREA AS A
 SEPARATE PLAN AND PLANT LIST. ADDRESS ALL MISSING
 PARKING AREA TREES IN TERMINAL ISLANDS.
 THIS IS A SEPARATE PARCEL, SO WILL REQUIRE AND
 AMENDMENT TO THAT PARCEL?S APPROVED SITE PLAN AND
 LANDSCAPE PLAN. PLACEMENT OF UTILITY LINES FOR THE
 PROPOSED SITE WITHIN THIS PARKING AREA CREATES
 NONCONFORMING LANDSCAPE AREAS BY DISPLACING REQUIRED
 TREES.
  
  
  
 RESOLUTION NO. 97-17
  
 8. PER EXHIBIT F, APPROVAL FROM THE ARCHITECTURAL
 REVIEW BOARD MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE LANDSCAPE AND
 IRRIGATION PROPOSED.
  
 9. SHOW LOCATION OF PUMP EQUIPMENT AND SOURCE FOR THE
 IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO MEET CONDITION #11 REQUIRING USE
 OF SURFACE WATER FROM LAKES.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 4 Status P Date 10-05-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 10-05-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 10-05-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-10-05 14:31:06NO FURTHER COMMENTS FROM DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 [email protected]
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 3 Status F Date 08-06-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 08-06-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 08-06-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-08-06 11:43:37PLEASE PROVIDE:
 1- AUTO TURN FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER
 TRUCK
  * TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT
  * TRUCK WITH: 11 FT
  * TURNING RADIUS:
  - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT
  - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT
 - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT
 2- TRASH ROOMS SPECIFICTION.
 3- COMPACTOR`S SPECIFICATIONS. FOR THE COMPACTORS`
 ROLL-OUT CONTAINERS TO BE SERVICED BY THE CITY, THE
 CONTAINERS SHALL BE COMPATIBLE WITH A FRONT-LOADER
 TRUCK.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 2 Status F Date 06-29-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 06-29-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 06-29-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-06-29 17:18:04 
 PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:
 1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID
 WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE AND TYPE OF
 THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR) THAT WILL BE
 UTILIZED THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION
 SERVICE.
 2- DETAILS FOR SANITATION SERVICE (I.E. CONTAINER TYPE,
 LOCATION, ETC.)
 3- DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP AND
 RECYCLING CONTAINERS.
  
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-06-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 12-06-2019 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 12-06-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-12-06 15:52:00 
 PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:
 - LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID
 WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE AND TYPE OF
 THE CONTAINER (I.E. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR) THAT WILL BE
 UTILIZED THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION
 SERVICE.
 - AUTO TURN FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER
 TRUCK
  * TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT
  * TRUCK WITH: 11 FT
  * TURNING RADIUS:
  - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT
  - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT
  - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT
 - DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP AND
 RECYCLING CONTAINERS.
 - FOR A FREESTANDING SITE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, THE
 ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST REVISION OF CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE
 ENCLOSURE STANDARD, CG-8.
  
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 4 Status F Date 11-23-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 11-23-2020 Time 14:00 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 11-23-2020 Time 14:25 Sent To  
Notes
2020-11-23 14:25:16THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 10/30/2020 SUBMITTAL:
  
 1. [SATISFIED] PAGE 17 OF THE DECLARATION OF CONVENANTS
 (ORB5430, PAGE 1548) STATES THERE IS TO BE A 20' BUFFER
 ADJACENT TO LAKES AND NO PARKING IS PERMITTED IN THE
 BUFFER. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE AMENDED CONVENANT.
 APPLICANT'S RESPONSE IS THAT THE BUFFER IS NOT NEEDED
 NEXT TO THE RETAINING WALL AROUND THE LAKE, WHICH WILL
 PERMIT THE PARKING GARAGE STRUCTURE WITHIN 20 FEET OF
 THE RETENTION AREA.
  
 1.1 [SATISFIED] SHOW THE 20' BUFFER PER THE DECLARATION
 OF COVENANTS ALONG THE PROPOSED LAKE EXPANSION.
 APPLICANT'S RESPONSE IS THAT THE BUFFER IS NOT NEEDED
 NEXT TO THE RETAININAG WALL AROUND THE LAKE.
  
 1.2 [NOT SATISFIED] PART OF THE CORNERS OF THE BUILDING
 AND BALCONIES APPEAR TO ENCROACH IN THE 20' CANAL
 BUFFER. APPLICANT'S RESPONSE STATES THE CANAL BUFFER
 WILL BE AMENDED. THIS AMENDMENT CAN BE A CONDITION FOR
 SITE PLAN APPROVAL WITH THE AMENDMENT PROVIDED BEFORE
 THE ISSUANCE OF THE BUIDLING PERMIT.
  
  
 1.3 [NOT SATISFIED] SECTION 8 OF THE DECLARATION OF
 COVENANTS STATES PARKING WILL NOT BE PERMITTED ON
 PUBLIC ROADWAYS. THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT OR THE LAW
 DEPARTMENT SHOULD DETERMINE IF THE DECLARATION OF
 COVENANTS SHOULD BE AMENDED.
  
 2. [SATISFIED] UPDATE THE REFERENCE TO THE FEMA FIRM
 LISTED ON THE SURVEY. NEW FLOOD MAPS WERE ISSUED IN
 2017. THE SURVEY WAS NOT INCLUDED WITH THIS SUBMITTAL.
 NOTE THIS IS THE THIRD REQUEST.
  
 3. [SATISFIED] CONSIDER RELOCATING THE WATER AND FIRE
 SERVICE LINES FROM UNDER LANDSCAPE ISLANDS TO AVOID
 CONFLICTS WITH THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING.
  
 4. [NO LONGER APPLICABLE] PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS IN
 EACH DIRECTION OF THE DETENTION AREA SHOWING THE GRAVEL
 PATHWAY.
  
 5. [SATISFIED] THE STORM ALIGNMENT ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLANS DOESN'T APPEAR TO MATCH THE ALIGNMENT OF ON THE
 ENGINEERING PLANS.
  
 6. [SATISFIED] CONFIRM THE LENGTH OF RETAINING WALL ALL
 ALONG THE LAKE DOES NOT EXCEED 40 PERCENT OF THE
 SHORELINE LENGTH PER SFWMD WET RETENTION/DETENTION AREA
 DIMENSIONAL CRITERIA. THE SHORELINE IS MEASURED AT THE
 CONTROL ELEVATION. APPLICANT'S RESPONSE STATES THE
 TOTAL LENGTH OF RETAINNING WALL AROUND THE LAKE WILL
 NOT EXCEED 40 PERCENT OF THE SHORELINE LENGTH.
  
 7. [NOT SATISFIED] THE FOLLOWING APPEAR TO BE PROPOSED
 TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON LAND NOT OWNED BY THE APPLICANT.
 CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS MAY
 BE NECESSARY.
 A. LAKE EXPANSION AND RETAINING WALL
 B. PAVER ENTRANCE
 C. WATER MAINS, WATER METER AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES
 D. STORMWATER AND SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURES
 E. PARKING LOT MODIFICATIONS
 THE MAINTENANCE AGREEEMENTS [IF REQUIRED BY OTHER
 PROPERTY OWNER(S)] AND CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS CAN BE A
 CONDITION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL, TO BE SUBMITTED
 BEFORE THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST BUILDING PERMIT.
  
 8. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE CCTV OF THE STORM SEWER AS SHOWN
 ON MAP PROVIDED BY V. NOEL/CWPB. CCTV WILL NOT BE
 NEEDED IF THE APPLICANT CAN PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION THAT
 THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE STORM SEWER IS NOT
 THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CITY.
  
 9. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] EAST SIDE OF PROPOSED BUILDING
 WILL BE CONSTRUCTED CLOSED TO THE EXISTING DRAINAGE
 SYSTEM. THERE IS AN EXISTING CATCH BASIN INLET UNDER A
 PROPOSED BALCONY. LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOW MULTIPLE SPECIES
 OF TREES OR PALMS PLANTED OVER OR NEAR THE STORM PIPE.
 STAFF SUGGESTS RELOCATING THE STORM PIPE AWAY FROM THE
 PROPOSED BUILDING AND PROVIDING ROOT BARRIERS AROUND
 TREES WHERE NEEDED. EXISTING STORM PIPE NEEDS TO BE
 SHOWN TO BE REMOVED WHERE APPLICABLE. WILL ONE OF THE
 NEW STRUCTURES BE AN INLET?
  
 10. [SATISFIED] CALL OUT EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT ON
 THE CIVIL PLAN AND PROPOSED CWPB UTILITY EASEMENT ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 11. [NOT SATISFIED] EXPLAIN WHAT THE EAST FACING ARROW
 REPRESENTS AS SHOWN ON THE CIVIL PLAN IN THE BIKE LANE
 OF CENTREPARK BLVD. E. [RESPONSE TO LAST SET OF
 COMMENTS INDICATED THE ARROW WAS DELETED. THE ARROW IS
 STILL ON THE CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN.
  
 12. [TO BE ADDRESSED AT ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL]
 UPDATE FDOT STANDARD INDEX REFERENCES TO FDOT STANDARD
 PLAN REFERENCES. THIS COMMENT CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH THE
 ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 13. [NEW COMMENT] PROPOSED RAISED INTERSECTION:
 A. NO STOP SIGN OR STOP BAR SHOWN.
 B. NO ADVANCED WARNING SIGNS SHOWN
 C. CURB RAMP ON NORTHWEST CORNER DOES NOT FALL WITHIN
 THE CROSS WALK.
 D. CROSS WALK AND CURB RAMP ON NORTHEAST CORNER FALLS
 WITHIN THE EAST SLOPE OF THE RAISED INTERSECTION.
 E. RAISED INTERSECTION WILL AFFECT DRAINAGE PATTERNS.
 F. NO MARKINGS SHOWN ON RAISED INTERSECTION FOR
 WESTBOUND THROUGH LANE
  
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 3 Status F Date 09-15-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 09-15-2020 Time 05:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 09-15-2020 Time 05:38 Sent To  
Notes
2020-09-15 05:38:19THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 8/5/2020 SUBMITTAL:
  
 1. [SATISFIED] PAGE 17 OF THE DECLARATION OF CONVENANTS
 (ORB5430, PAGE 1548) STATES THERE IS TO BE A 20' BUFFER
 ADJACENT TO LAKES AND NO PARKING IS PERMITTED IN THE
 BUFFER. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE AMENDED CONVENANT.
 APPLICANT'S RESPONSE IS THAT THE BUFFER IS NOT NEEDED
 NEXT TO THE RETAINING WALL AROUND THE LAKE, WHICH WILL
 PERMIT THE PARKING GARAGE STRUCTURE WITHIN 20 FEET OF
 THE RETENTION AREA.
  
 1.1 [SATISFIED] SHOW THE 20' BUFFER PER THE DECLARATION
 OF COVENANTS ALONG THE PROPOSED LAKE EXPANSION.
 APPLICANT'S RESPONSE IS THAT THE BUFFER IS NOT NEEDED
 NEXT TO THE RETAININAG WALL AROUND THE LAKE.
  
 1.2 [NOT SATISFIED] PART OF THE CORNERS OF THE BUILDING
 AND BALCONIES APPEAR TO ENCROACH IN THE 20' CANAL
 BUFFER. APPLICANT'S RESPONSE STATES THE CANAL BUFFER
 WILL BE AMENDED. THIS AMENDMENT CAN BE A CONDITION FOR
 SITE PLAN APPROVAL WITH THE AMENDMENT PROVIDED BEFORE
 THE ISSUANCE OF THE BUIDLING PERMIT.
  
  
 1.3 [NOT SATISFIED] SECTION 8 OF THE DECLARATION OF
 COVENANTS STATES PARKING WILL NOT BE PERMITTED ON
 PUBLIC ROADWAYS. THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT OR THE LAW
 DEPARTMENT SHOULD DETERMINE IF THE DECLARATION OF
 COVENANTS SHOULD BE AMENDED.
  
 2. [NOT SATISFIED] UPDATE THE REFERENCE TO THE FEMA
 FIRM LISTED ON THE SURVEY. NEW FLOOD MAPS WERE ISSUED
 IN 2017. THE SURVEY WAS NOT INCLUDED WITH THIS
 SUBMITTAL. NOTE THIS IS THE THIRD REQUEST.
  
 3. [SATISFIED] CONSIDER RELOCATING THE WATER AND FIRE
 SERVICE LINES FROM UNDER LANDSCAPE ISLANDS TO AVOID
 CONFLICTS WITH THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING.
  
 4. [NO LONGER APPLICABLE] PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS IN
 EACH DIRECTION OF THE DETENTION AREA SHOWING THE GRAVEL
 PATHWAY.
  
 5. [SATISFIED] THE STORM ALIGNMENT ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLANS DOESN'T APPEAR TO MATCH THE ALIGNMENT OF ON THE
 ENGINEERING PLANS.
  
 6. [SATISFIED] CONFIRM THE LENGTH OF RETAINING WALL ALL
 ALONG THE LAKE DOES NOT EXCEED 40 PERCENT OF THE
 SHORELINE LENGTH PER SFWMD WET RETENTION/DETENTION AREA
 DIMENSIONAL CRITERIA. THE SHORELINE IS MEASURED AT THE
 CONTROL ELEVATION. APPLICANT'S RESPONSE STATES THE
 TOTAL LENGTH OF RETAINNING WALL AROUND THE LAKE WILL
 NOT EXCEED 40 PERCENT OF THE SHORELINE LENGTH.
  
 7. [NOT SATISFIED] THE FOLLOWING APPEAR TO BE PROPOSED
 TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON LAND NOT OWNED BY THE APPLICANT.
 CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS MAY
 BE NECESSARY.
 A. LAKE EXPANSION AND RETAINING WALL
 B. PAVER ENTRANCE
 C. WATER MAINS, WATER METER AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES
 D. STORMWATER AND SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURES
 E. PARKING LOT MODIFICATIONS
 THE MAINTENANCE AGREEEMENTS [IF REQUIRED BY OTHER
 PROPERTY OWNER(S)] AND CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS CAN BE A
 CONDITION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL, TO BE SUBMITTED
 BEFORE THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST BUILDING PERMIT.
  
 8. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE CCTV OF THE STORM SEWER AS SHOWN
 ON MAP PROVIDED BY V. NOEL/CWPB. CCTV WILL NOT BE
 NEEDED IF THE APPLICANT CAN PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION THAT
 THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE STORM SEWER IS NOT
 THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CITY.
  
 9. [NOT SATISFIED] EAST SIDE OF PROPOSED BUILDING WILL
 BE CONSTRUCTED CLOSED TO THE EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM.
 THERE IS AN EXISTING CATCH BASIN INLET UNDER A PROPOSED
 BALCONY. LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOW MULTIPLE SPECIES OF TREES
 OR PALMS PLANTED OVER OR NEAR THE STORM PIPE. STAFF
 SUGGESTS RELOCATING THE STORM PIPE AWAY FROM THE
 PROPOSED BUILDING AND PROVIDING ROOT BARRIERS AROUND
 TREES WHERE NEEDED.
  
 10. [NEW COMMENT] CALL OUT EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT ON
 THE CIVIL PLAN AND PROPOSED CWPB UTILITY EASEMENT ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 11. [NEW COMMENT] EXPLAIN WHAT THE EAST FACING ARROW
 REPRESENTS AS SHOWN ON THE CIVIL PLAN IN THE BIKE LANE
 OF CENTREPARK BLVD. E.
  
 12. [NEW COMMENT] UPDATE FDOT STANDARD INDEX REFERENCES
 TO FDOT STANDARD PLAN REFERENCES. THIS COMMENT CAN BE
 ADDRESSED WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-31-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 07-31-2020 Time 06:09 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 07-31-2020 Time 06:14 Sent To  
Notes
2020-07-31 06:09:50THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE SUBMITTAL PROVIDED
 FOR THE JULY 9, 2020 PPRC MEETING AND MUST BE ADDRESSED
 PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. [NOT SATISFIED] PAGE 17 OF THE DECLARATION OF
 CONVENANTS (ORB5430, PAGE 1548) STATES THERE IS TO BE A
 20' BUFFER ADJACENT TO LAKES AND NO PARKING IS
 PERMITTED IN THE BUFFER. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE AMENDED
 CONVENANT.
  
 1.1 [NEW COMMENT] SHOW THE 20' BUFFER PER THE
 DECLARATION OF COVENANTS ALONG THE PROPOSED LAKE
 EXPANSION.
  
 1.2 [NEW COMMENT] PART OF THE CORNERS OF THE BUILDING
 AND BALCONIES APPEAR TO ENCROACH IN THE 20' CANAL
 BUFFER.
  
  
 1.3 [NEW COMMENT] SECTION 8 OF THE DECLARATION OF
 COVENANTS STATES PARKING WILL NOT BE PERMITTED ON
 PUBLIC ROADWAYS.
  
 2. [NOT SATISFIED] UPDATE THE REFERENCE TO THE FEMA
 FIRM LISTED ON THE SURVEY. NEW FLOOD MAPS WERE ISSUED
 IN 2017.
  
 3. [SATISFIED] CONSIDER RELOCATING THE WATER AND FIRE
 SERVICE LINES FROM UNDER LANDSCAPE ISLANDS TO AVOID
 CONFLICTS WITH THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING.
  
 4. [NO LONGER APPLICABLE] PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS IN
 EACH DIRECTION OF THE DETENTION AREA SHOWING THE GRAVEL
 PATHWAY.
  
 5. [SATISFIED] THE STORM ALIGNMENT ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLANS DOESN'T APPEAR TO MATCH THE ALIGNMENT OF ON THE
 ENGINEERING PLANS.
  
 6. [NEW COMMENT] CONFIRM THE LENGTH OF RETAINING WALL
 ALL ALONG THE LAKE DOES NOT EXCEED 40 PERCENT OF THE
 SHORELINE LENGTH PER SFWMD WET RETENTION/DETENTION AREA
 DIMENSIONAL CRITERIA. THE SHORELINE IS MEASURED AT THE
 CONTROL ELEVATION.
  
 7. [NEW COMMENT] THE FOLLOWING APPEAR TO BE PROPOSED TO
 BE CONSTRUCTED ON LAND NOT OWNED BY THE APPLICANT.
 CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS MAY
 BE NECESSARY.
 A. LAKE EXPANSION AND RETAINING WALL
 B. PAVER ENTRANCE
 C. WATER MAINS, WATER METER AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES
 D. STORMWATER AND SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURES
 E. PARKING LOT MODIFICATIONS
  
 8. [NEW COMMENT] PROVIDE CCTV OF THE STORM SEWER AS
 SHOWN ON MAP PROVIDED BY V. NOEL/CWPB. CCTV WILL NOT BE
 NEEDED IF THE APPLICANT CAN PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION THAT
 THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE STORM SEWER IS NOT
 THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CITY.
  
 9. [NEW COMMENT] EAST SIDE OF PROPOSED BUILDING WILL BE
 CONSTRUCTED CLOSED TO THE EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM.
 THERE IS AN EXISTING CATCH BASIN INLET UNDER A PROPOSED
 BALCONY.
  
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-10-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 12-10-2019 Time 13:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 12-10-2019 Time 13:43 Sent To  
Notes
2019-12-10 13:37:27THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
  
 HTTPS://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FO
 RMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. PAGE 17 OF THE DECLARATION OF CONVENANTS (ORB5430,
 PAGE 1548) STATES THERE IS TO BE A 20' BUFFER ADJACENT
 TO LAKES AND NO PARKING IS PERMITTED IN THE BUFFER.
  
 2. UPDATE THE REFERENCE TO THE FEMA FIRM LISTED ON THE
 SURVEY. NEW FLOOD MAPS WERE ISSUED IN 2017.
  
 3. CONSIDER RELOCATING THE WATER AND FIRE SERVICE LINES
 FROM UNDER LANDSCAPE ISLANDS TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH
 THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING.
  
 4. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS IN EACH DIRECTION OF THE
 DETENTION AREA SHOWING THE GRAVEL PATHWAY.
  
 5. THE STORM ALIGNMENT ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS DOESN?T
 APPEAR TO MATCH THE ALIGNMENT OF ON THE ENGINEERING
 PLANS.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
 THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS
 CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE
 ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED
 WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP PERMIT MODIFICATION
 PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 11-23-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 11-23-2020 Time 13:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-11-23 13:11:181. TREES IN UE AND ADJACENT TO 12" WATER MAIN NEEDS TO
 BE DISCUSSED WITH UTILITIES AND RAY CARANCI. ADVICE IS
 TO SEEK ALTERNATIVE LOCATION.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WILL INCLUDE TERMINATION OF
 LANDSCAPE EASEMENT AND LAKE BUFFER MODIFICATION.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 09-11-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 09-11-2020 Time 08:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-09-11 08:16:441. CCTV JUST RECEIVED AND WILL NEED TO BE REVIEWED.
 2. PROPOSED LANDSCAPING ALONG CENTREPARK DRIVE FALLS ON
 TOP OF EXISTING 12" WATER MAIN WHICH IS NOT ALLOWED.
 3. NO TREES WITHIN 5 FEET OF WATER OR SANITARY
 SERVICES.
 4. NEED SIGN-OFF OF POA OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS IN
 BUFFERS PRIOR TO APPROVAL.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-07-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 07-07-2020 Time 08:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-07-07 08:48:391. ENGINEERING PLAN TOO CONGESTED.
 2. TAP INTO WATER MAIN NEEDS TO BE CLOSED TO METERS.
 CITY DOES NOT WANT THAT RUN OF MAIN. METERS CONFLICT
 WITH PROPOSED LANDSCAPING.
 3. BUILDINGS ENCROACH INTO CANAL BUFFER. POA WILL NEED
 TO SIGN OFF ON ENCROACHMENT AND ABANDONMENT OF
 LANDSCAPE EASEMENT.
 4. CUSTOMER SERVICE WILL NEED TO APPROVE OFF-SITE
 METERS.
 5. UTILITIES WILL DETERMINE POINT OF SERVICE FOR
 SANITARY.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-10-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 12-10-2019 Time 07:30 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-12-10 07:36:551. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ANY
 NON-STANDARD ITEMS IN RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 2. ACCESS EASEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR SIDEWALK WITHIN
 PROPERTY ALONG CENTREPARK BLVD.
 3. PROVIDE COPY OF CROSS-ACCESS/UTILITY AGREEMENT.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 11-23-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 11-23-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-11-23 14:48:48TRAFFIC STATEMENT ? NO COMMENTS
 SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
 1. IMPLEMENT PATTERNS (EITHER BRICKS OR THERMOPLASTIC)
 ON THE PROPOSED 4" RAISED INTERSECTION
 2. SHOWCASE IN THE SITE PLANS THE BIKE LANE TRANSITION
 PRIOR TO THE WESTBOUND RIGHT-TURN LANE ON CENTREPARK
 BLVD
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 09-14-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 09-14-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 08-08-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-09-14 13:09:06 
  
 TRAFFIC STATEMENT ? NO COMMENTS
  
 SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
  
 1. THE 24 FEET WIDTH FOR THE DRIVEWAY ON CENTREPARK
 DRIVE EAST MAY BE MAINTAINED, BUT THE FOLLOWING
 FEATURES PROVIDED: COLORED THERMOPLASTIC CROSSING
 MARKINGS AND PEDESTRIAN REFUGE ISLAND.
 2. CLARIFY THE DELIVERY ACCESS PATH BETWEEN THE LOADING
 AREA AND THE RETAIL USE.
 3. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE A MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA
 (MINIMUM 8 X 20 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION
 READINESS (CIRCUIT BOX AND ELECTRIC CONDUIT)
 4. PROVIDE BIKE LANES ON CENTREPARK DRIVE EAST ALONG
 THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE SO TO INCENTIVIZE BICYCLE MODE OF
 TRANSPORTATION AND TO CONNECT TO THE PLANNED BIKE LANE
 SYSTEM ON CENTREPARK BLVD. THIS FEATURE SHALL BE
 IMPLEMENTED AS PART OF THE TDM STRATEGIES AND
 INDEPENDENTLY OF PARKING WAIVER APPLICATION(S), IF ANY.
 5. PROVIDE A ROUNDABOUT OR A DUTCH JUNCTION AT
 CENTREPARK BOULEVARD/CENTREPARK DRIVE EAST TO
 FACILITATE BICYCLE TURNING MOVEMENTS. THIS FEATURE
 SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AS PART OF THE TDM STRATEGIES AND
 INDEPENDENTLY OF PARKING WAIVER APPLICATION(S), IF ANY.
 6. PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN REFUGE ISLANDS AT THE CENTREPARK
 DRIVE EAST AND CENTREPARK BOULEVARD INTERSECTION FOR
 SAFETY PURPOSES AND TO FACILITATE ACCESS TO THE NEARBY
 BUS STOP ON AUSTRALIAN AVENUE.
 7. SIDEWALK EASEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE PORTION
 OF SIDEWALK OUTSIDE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. PLEASE
 SHOWCASE THE EXTENT OF THE EASEMENT IN THE SITE PLAN.
 8. IMPLEMENT AND/OR ACKNOWLEDGE THE FOLLOWING
 TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES TO BE
 CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY?S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
 A. UNBUNDLE PARKING FROM RESIDENTS? LEASES (IF RENTAL
 UNITS).
 B. PROVIDE FOR A PERIOD OF ONE-YEAR SUBSIDIZED TRI-RAIL
 PASS WHICH REDUCES THE FARES BY 50% FOR NEW RESIDENTS,
 OR SUBSIDIZED MICRO-MOBILITY SERVICE OR PALM TRAN BUS
 PASS WITH EQUIVALENT MONETARY VALUES.
 C. COORDINATE WITH TRI-RAIL TO INVESTIGATE HAVING THE
 TRI-RAIL AIRPORT SHUTTLE TO ADD A STOP AT THE EXISTING
 PALM TRAN STOP NEAR THE SITE.
 D. MICRO-MOBILITY AND BICYCLE USE INCENTIVES, BY POLICY
 AND SITE DESIGN
  
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-09-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 07-09-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-07-09 13:02:42TRAFFIC STATEMENT COMMENT:
 1. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER
 2. PROVIDE PROPER INTERSECTION ANALYSIS AT CENTREPARK
 BOULEVARD/CENTREPARK DRIVE EAST. PROVIDE SYNCHRO
 OUTPUTS FOR THE FOLLOWING SCENARIOS:
 A. EXISTING
 B. FUTURE (INCLUSIVE OF OTHER APPROVED/PLANNED
 DEVELOPMENTS)
 C. FUTURE +PROJECT
 3. PROVIDE TRAFFIC COUNTS DATA
 SITE PLAN COMMENT:
 4. REDUCE THE DRIVEWAY WIDTH TO 24 FEET FOR THE
 DRIVEWAY ON CENTREPARK DRIVE EAST.
 5. PROVIDE AUTOTURN PATHS FOR DELIVERY AND SERVICE
 VEHICLES FOR THE LOADING AREA.
 6. CLARIFY THE DELIVERY ACCESS PATH BETWEEN THE LOADING
 AREA AND THE RETAIL USE.
 7. PROVIDE BIKE LANES ON CENTREPARK DRIVE EAST TO
 FACILITATE BICYCLE MODE OF TRANSPORTATION IN THIS AREA.
 8. PROVIDE A ROUNDABOUT OR A DUTCH JUNCTION AT
 CENTREPARK BOULEVARD/CENTREPARK DRIVE EAST TO
 FACILITATE BICYCLE TURNING MOVEMENT.
 9. PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS AND REFUGE ISLANDS AT
 THE CENTREPARK DRIVE EAST AND CENTREPARK BOULEVARD
 INTERSECTION FOR SAFETY PURPOSED AND TO FACILITATE
 ACCESS TO THE NEARBY BUS STOP ON AUSTRALIAN AVENUE.
 10. SIDEWALK EASEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE PORTION
 OF SIDEWALK OUTSIDE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 11. IMPLEMENT THE FOLLOWING TRANSPORTATION DEMAND
 MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE
 CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
 A. UNBUNDLE PARKING FROM RESIDENTS' LEASES (IF RENTAL
 UNITS).
 B. PROVIDE FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR SUBSIDIZED TRI-RAIL
 PASS WHICH REDUCES THE FARES BY 50% FOR NEW RESIDENTS,
 OR SUBSIDIZED MICRO-MOBILITY SERVICE OR PALM TRAN BUS
 PASS WITH EQUIVALENT MONETARY VALUES.
 C. COORDINATE WITH TRI-RAIL TO INVESTIGATE HAVING THE
 TRI-RAIL AIRPORT SHUTTLE TO ADD A STOP AT THE EXISTING
 PALM TRAN STOP NEAR THE SITE.
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 01-17-2020 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-01-17 16:25:46TRAFFIC STATEMENT COMMENT:
 1. PROVIDE INTERSECTION ANALYSIS AT CENTREPARK
 BOULEVARD/CENTREPARK DRIVE EAST.
 2. PROVIDE TRIP DISTRIBUTION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN
 THE RADIUS OF INFLUENCE CONSISTENT WITH COUNTY?S TPS
 REQUIREMENT.
  
  
 SITE PLAN COMMENT:
 3. REDUCE THE DRIVEWAY WIDTH TO 24 FEET FOR THE
 DRIVEWAY ON CENTREPARK DRIVE EAST.
 4. THE DRIVEWAY DESIGNS ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN AND
 SITE PLAN ARE DIFFERENT. PLEASE VERIFY AND REVISE.
 5. PROVIDE AUTOTURN PATHS FOR DELIVERY AND SERVICE
 VEHICLES FOR THE LOADING AREA.
 6. CLARIFY THE DELIVERY ACCESS PATH BETWEEN THE LOADING
 AREA AND THE RETAIL USE.
 7. PROVIDE BIKE LANES ON CENTREPARK DRIVE EAST TO
 FACILITATE BICYCLE MODE OF TRANSPORTATION IN THIS AREA.
 8. PROVIDE ROUNDABOUT OR DUTCH JUNCTION AT CENTREPARK
 BOULEVARD/CENTREPARK DRIVE EAST TO FACILITATE BICYCLE
 TURNING MOVEMENT.
 9. PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN REFUGE ISLAND NEAR CENTREPARK
 DRIVE EAST FOR PEDESTRIANS CROSSING CENTREPARK
 BOULEVARD TO FACILITY ACCESS TO THE NEARBY BUS STOP ON
 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE.
 10. PROVIDE SEPARATED PARKING ACCESS ROAD ALONG THE
 SITE FRONTAGE ON CENTREPARK BOULEVARD, SIMILAR TO THE
 PROPOSED PARKING ACCESS ROAD FOR 1500 CENTREPARK
 BOULEVARD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
 11. SIDEWALK EASEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE PORTION
 OF SIDEWALK OUTSIDE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 12. IMPLEMENT THE FOLLOWING TRANSPORTATION DEMAND
 MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE
 CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
 A. UNBUNDLE PARKING FROM RESIDENTS? LEASES (IF RENTAL
 UNITS).
 B. PROVIDE FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR SUBSIDIZED TRI-RAIL
 PASS WHICH REDUCES THE FARES BY 50% FOR NEW RESIDENTS,
 OR SUBSIDIZED MICRO-MOBILITY SERVICE OR PALM TRAN BUS
 PASS WITH EQUIVALENT MONETARY VALUES.
 C. COORDINATE WITH TRI-RAIL TO INVESTIGATE HAVING THE
 TRI-RAIL AIRPORT SHUTTLE TO ADD A STOP AT THE EXISTING
 PALM TRAN STOP NEAR THE SITE.
  
  
 SHING TSOI
 CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
 561-494-1141
 [email protected]
 (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS)
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 09-14-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 09-14-2020 Time 15:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 09-14-2020 Time 15:59 Sent To  
Notes
2020-09-14 17:03:10PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: SEPTEMBER 14, 2020
 PROJECT NO.: Z19110010
 CASE NO.: PB 791II
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - PLEASE CLARIFY THE
 METHODOLOGY REGARDING THE PARKING CALCULATION. A SHARED
 PARKING CALCULATION IS BEING USED, BUT A PARKING STUDY
 HAS ALSO BEEN PROVIDED TO JUSTIFY A FURTHER REDUCTION
 IN THE REQUIRED PARKING. AS SUCH, THE APPLICATION WOULD
 NEED TO BE AMENDED TO SHOW THAT A PARKING WAIVER IS
 BEING REQUESTED. PARKING WAIVERS WITHIN A PLANNED
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL COMPLY WITH SEC. 94-207(B)(13) OF THE
 CITY?S ZLDRS.
  
 1.1 [ NOT SATISFIED ] - STAFF WOULD LIKE CLARIFICATION
 OR HAVE FURTHER DISCUSSION TO UNDERSTAND THE SHARED
 PARKING CALCUALTION THAT IS BEING SHOWN.
  
 1.2 [ NEW COMMENT ] - LOT 4N AND 4S SEEM TO BE
 MISLABELED IN THE "PARKING PROVIDED" PORTION OF THE
 METHODOLOGY.
  
 2. [ SATISFIED - CONDITION OF APPROVAL ] - PLEASE
 PROVIDE CLARIFICATION AS TO HOW THE CONFLICTS WITH FPL,
 AS STATED IN THEIR LETTER (NOVEMBER 5, 2019) WILL BE
 ADDRESSED.
  
 2.1 [ SATISFIED - CONDITION OF APPROVAL ] - A PORTION
 OF THE BUILDING IS SHOWN ENROACHING INTO AN EXISTING
 FPL EASEMENT NEAR THE INTERSECTION.
  
 3. [ SATISFIED ] - SITE PLAN SHALL IDENTIFY THE
 VISIBILITY TRIANGLE AT THE CORNER OF CENTREPARK
 BOULEVARD AND CENTREPARK DRIVE EAST. NO ENCROACHMENTS
 BETWEEN 18 INCHES AND EIGHT (8) FEET SHALL BE WITHIN
 THIS AREA.
  
 4. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - PLEASE PROVIDE
 CLARIFICATION ON HOW TRASH WILL BE MANAGED AND PICKED
 UP.
  
 4.1. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - PLEASE PROVIDE CONFIRMATION
 FROM THE CITY'S PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT THAT PROVIDED
 PICK-UP WILL BE PERMITTED.
  
 5. [ SATISFIED ] - PARKING DETAIL ON SHEET SP-1 IS
 INCORRECT.
  
 5.1. [ SATISFIED ] - THE NOTE INDICATES TWO (2) FEET TO
 THE BACK OF THE WHEEL STOP, BUT THE DIMENSION LINE
 INDICATES THREE (3) FEET.
  
 5.2. [ SATISFIED ] - THE LENGTH OF THE STALL IS
 DIMENSIONED AT 28 FEET; THIS SHOULD BE 18 FEET.
  
 5.3. [ SATISFIED ] - THE WIDTH OF THE HANDICAP STALL IS
 DIMENSIONED AT 19 FEET; THIS SHOULD BE 12 FEET.
  
 5.4. [ SATISIFIED ] - THE WIDTH OF THE HANDICAP AISLE
 IS DIMENSIONED AT EIGHT (8) FEET; THIS SHOULD BE FIVE
 (5) FEET.
  
 5.5 [ SATISIFIED ] - THE STRIPING FOR THE HANDICAP
 ACCESS AISLE IS INCORRECT.
  
 6. [ SATISFIED ] - THE PARKING CONFIGURATION SHOWN ON
 THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.
  
 7. [ SATISFIED ] - THERE APPEARS TO BE A NUMBER OF
 LOCATIONS WHERE THE STRUCTURAL COLUMNS ARE ENCROACHING
 INTO THE PARKING STALL. THE COLUMNS SHALL BE CONTAINED
 ENTIRELY WITHIN THE DOUBLE-STRIPE AND NOT IMPEDE ON THE
 MINIMUM WIDTH OF THE STALL. A DETAIL MAY NEED TO BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 7.1. [ SATISFIED ] - ENCROACHMENTS ARE STILL SHOWN. A
 DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 8. [ NO LONGER APPLICABLE ] - THE AMENITIES PROVIDED IN
 THE DETENTION AREA HAVE NO ACCESS TO RESIDENTS/PATRONS
 OF THE BUILDING. THE ONLY SIDEWALK THAT CONNECT TO THE
 PATHWAY IS THAT WHICH HAS ACCESS TO THE TRACH ROOM, FPL
 VAULT, FIRE PUMP, ETC. ACCESS SHALL BE PROVIDE TO THE
 PUBLIC WALKWAY, CAF? AND/OR LOBBY AND LEASING AREA.
  
 9. [ NO LONGER APPLICABLE ] - TANDEM PARKING SPACES
 ONLY WORK IF THEY ARE ASSIGNED TO SPECIFIC UNITS. AS
 SUCH, THESE SPACES CANNOT BE CONSIDERED TOWARD THE
 SHARED PARKING CALCULATION AS THEY WOULD NOT BE
 AVAILABLE FOR USE BY MULTIPLE OWNERS/TENANTS.
  
 10. [ NO LONGER APPLICABLE ] - TANDEM PARKING SPACES
 SHALL NOT HAVE WHEEL STOPS IN BETWEEN THE TWO SPACES.
  
 11. [ NO LONGER APPLICABLE ] - THERE'S SOME CONCERN
 WITH REGARDING THE SINGLE PARKING SPACE IMMEDIATELY
 ADJACENT TO THE LOADING AREA ON THE FIRST LEVEL AS IT
 SEEMS THAT IT WOULD RESULT IN CONFLICTS IN INCOMING
 VEHICLES AS THE SPACE IS CONCEALED BEHIND THE WALL.
  
 12. [ NO LONGER APPLICABLE ] - THERE APPEARS TO BE
 INSUFFICIENT BACK-OUT SPACE OF THE FIRST PARKING SPACE
 AS YOU ENTER THE GARAGE ON THE FIRST LEVEL (NORTH
 SIDE).
  
 13. [ SATISIFED ] - DIMENSIONS OF BALCONY ENCROACHMENTS
 SHALL BE PROVIDED. BALCONIES SHALL NOT PROJECT MORE
 THAN THREE (3) FEET INTO ANY REQUIRED SETBACK.
  
 13.1 [ SATISFIED ] - DIMENSIONS NEED TO BE PROVIDED FOR
 ALL BALCONIES, ETC. THAT ARE ENCROACHING INTO A
 SETBACK.
  
 14. [ NO LONGER APPLICABLE ] - STAFF DOESN'T QUITE
 UNDERSTAND THE CONCEPT OF HAVING THE ?PLAZA? DESIGN IN
 FRONT OF THE GROUND FLOOR RESIDENTIAL UNITS ALONG
 CENTREPARK BLVD. WALK-UP UNIT DESIGNS SHOULD BE
 PROVIDED, BUT I BELIEVE SOME LEVEL OF PRIVACY NEEDS TO
 BE ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE DESIGN.
  
 15. [ NO LONGER APPLICABLE ] - WHAT ARE THE ELEVATION
 DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE CENTREPARK BOULEVARD PLAZA AREA
 AND THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION OF THE GROUND FLOOR
 UNITS/RETAIL? ARE STEPS NEEDED? ACCESSIBLE ROUTES?
  
 16. [ SATISFIED ] - THE LOCATION OF THE BIKE STORAGE
 AREAS IN THE GARAGE DO NOT SEEM CONDUCIVE FOR USE BY
 THE RESIDENTS.
  
 17. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - SETBACKS SHALL BE
 MEASURED FROM THE PROPERTY LINE TO THE CLOSEST POINT OF
 THE BUILDING. AS THE FITNESS ROOM EXTEND BEYOND THE
 WALL OF THE PARKING GARAGE, THE SETBACK SHALL BE
 MEASURED TO THE EXTERIOR WALL OF THE FITNESS ROOM.
  
 17.1 [ SATISFIED ] - THE BOLD LINE ON THE SITE PLAN
 DOES NOT APPEAR TO MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS, AND
 THERE APPEARS TO BE STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS EXTENDING INTO
 THE AREA THAT IS BEING IDENTIFIED AS THE SETBACK.
  
 17.2 [ NEW COMMENT ] - SETBACK SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM
 THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PARKING GARAGE TO THE
 ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE. ENSURE THAT THIS DIMENSION IS
 AT LEAST 5 FEET.
  
 18. [ SATISFIED ] - THE FLOOR PLAN, SITE PLAN, AND
 ELEVATIONS DO NOT SEEM TO CORRESPOND, NOR SHOW ALL
 ELEMENTS OF THE BUILDING. THERE IS INCONSISTENCIES IN
 THE GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN, DECORATIVE FA?ADE
 ELEMENTS, BALCONIES, STRUCTURAL COLUMNS, ETC.
  
 19. [ NO LONGER APPLICABLE ] - DOES STAIR #1 NEED TO
 HAVE DIRECT EGRESS TO THE OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING? THE
 SITE PLAN SHOWS A DOOR EXITING THE STAIRWELL TO THE
 CENTREPARK BLVD. PLAZA, BUT THE FLOOR PLAN SHOWS THE
 FIRE COMMAND CENTER IN THIS LOCATION WITH EGRESS ONLY
 THROUGH THE LOBBY.
  
 20. [ SATISFIED ] - DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS NEED TO BE
 MADE FOR THE FACADES OF THE GARAGE THAT FACE THE CANAL
 AND THE ADJACENT OFFICE BUILDING.
  
 20.1 [ SATISFIED ] - AS DISCUSSED IN RECENT
 CONVERSATIONS, STAFF NEEDS A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF
 THE FACADE OF THE GARAGE, HOW THE LANDSCAPING PLAYS
 INTO ENHANCING THE FACADE, ETC. AN ARCHITECTURAL
 RENDERING SHOWING THE DESIGN, LANDSCAPING, ETC. SHALL
 BE PROVIDED FOR FURTHER REVIEW, AND ENHANCEMENTS TO THE
 FACADE MAY BE REQUIRED.
  
 21. [ SATISFIED ] - PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PROJECT WILL
 BE SUBJECT TO THE CENTREPARK AFFORDABLE AND WORKFORCE
 HOUSING POLICY THAT WAS APPROVED WITH THE ADOPTION OF
 RESOLUTION NO. 98-17. AS REQUIRED BY THE POLICY, THE
 APPLICATION SHALL PROVIDE A WRITTEN CERTIFICATION AS
 PART OF THE SITE PLAN APPLICATION IDENTIFYING WHICH
 UNITS WILL BE OFFERED AS WORKFORCE HOUSING UNITS.
 PLEASE REFER TO THE POLICY FOR ALL UNIT RESTRICTIONS
 THAT ARE REQUIRED.
  
 22. [ SATISIFED - CONDITION OF APPROVAL ] - PLEASE NOTE
 THAT PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 98-17, UPON OBTAINING
 SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE APPLICANT SHALL CONTRIBUTE
 $150/UNIT TO THE WORKFORCE HOUSING TRUST FUND, UNLESS
 THE CITY CHOOSES TO USE IT TOWARD THE DEVELOPMENT OF A
 TRANSIT PLAN TO PROVIDE CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN DOWNTOWN
 AND CENTREPARK. IF THIS OPTION IS CHOSEN, THEN THE
 APPLICANT SHALL WORK WITH THE CITY ON THE DEVELOPMENT
 OF THIS PLAN.
  
 23. [ PARTIALLY SATISIFED ] - PLEASE NOTE THAT PURSUANT
 TO SECTION 5, CONDITION #11 OF RESOLUTION NO. 97-17,
 ALL IRRIGATION SHALL BE PROVIDED UTILIZING THE LAKES
 (NO POTABLE WATER SHALL BE UTILIZED). PLEASE PROVIDE A
 NOTE ON THE PLANS INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH SUCH
 PROVISION.
  
 23.1 [ NOT SATISFIED ] - THE IRRIGATION NOTE SHOULD BE
 ADDED TO THE LANDSCAPE PLANS AS WELL.
  
 24. [ SATISFIED ] - PLEASE NOTE THAT PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 5, CONDITION #13 OF RESOLUTION NO. 97-17,
 WATER-SAVING PLUMBING FIXTURES SHALL BE INSTALLED
 THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT. PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE ON THE
 PLANS INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH SUCH PROVISION.
  
 25. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - PLEASE PROVIDE A TURNING
 RADIUS ANALYSIS FOR THE UTILIZATION OF THE LOADING AREA
 AND DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR.
  
 25.1 [ SATISFIED ] - AN ANALYSIS NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED
 FOR ALL OF THE LOADING AREAS THAT ARE SHOWN (INSIDE THE
 GARAGE AS WELL AS ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF THE
 BUILDING). INGRESS/EGRESS INTO THESE AREAS APPEARS TO
 BE VERY DIFFICULT, IF EVEN POSSIBLE.
  
 25.2 [ NEW COMMENT ] - TURNING MOVEMENTS FOR THE
 DUMPSTER SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY'S PUBLIC WORKS
 DEPARTMENT.
  
 26. [ SATISFIED ] - INTERNAL CONNECTION SHOULD BE
 PROVIDED BETWEEN THE RESIDENTIAL LOBBY/LEASING AND THE
 PROPOSED CAFE/RETAIL.
  
 26.1 [ SATISFIED ] - FOR OPTION B, IS THERE ANY WAY TO
 RELOCATE THE WESTERN ENTRANCE OF THE RETAIL SPACE SO
 THAT IT CONNECTS WITH THE RESIDENTIAL LOBBY?
  
 27. [ SATISFIED - CONDITION OF APPROVAL ] - MULTIPLE
 IMPROVEMENTS ARE BEING SHOWN IN THE UTILITY EASEMENT
 THAT IS ADJACENT TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 28. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - ELEVATIONS INFORMATION NEEDS TO
 BE PROVIDED FOR ALL STAIRS THAT ARE ENCROACHING INTO A
 REQUIRED SETBACK.
  
 29. [ SATISFIED ] - BIKE PARKING FACILITIES SHALL BE
 PROVIDED FOR THE THE NON-RESIDENTIAL USES.
  
 30. [ SATISFIED ] - AS DISCUSSED PREVIIOUSLY, THE
 COURTYARD NEEDS TO BE FURTHER DESIGNED AND
 CLARIFICATION NEEDS TO BE MADE ABOUT THE TREATMENT OF
 THE COURTYARD ADJACENT TO THE TRASH BIN HOLDING AREA,
 LOADING ZONE, PARKING GARAGE, ETC.
  
 31. [ SATISFIED ] - MORE DETAIL NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED
 FOR STAFF TO UNDERSTAND THE AREA AT THE NORTHEAST
 CORNER OF THE BUILDING (TRASH BIN HOLDING AREA, LOADING
 DOCKS, ROLLING GATE, ETC.). IT IS HARD TO DISTIGUISH
 WHAT IS WITHIN THE BUILDING VERSUS WHAT IS OUTSIDE.
  
 32. [ SATISFIED ] - ADDITIONAL DETIAL NEEDS TO BE
 PROVIDED REGARDING THE ROLLING GATE AT THE LOADING
 DOCKS. IT APPEARS THAT THE GATE BLOCKS A DOORWAY TO THE
 WEST. DOES THE GATE ROLL TO THE EAST? IF SO, IT MAY
 ENRCOACH INTO THE PARKING SPACES.
  
 33. [ SATISFIED ] - AS DISCUSSED PREVIOUSLY, STAFF HAS
 CONCERNS WITH THE OPEN LOADING DOCKS ON THE NORTH SIDE
 OF THE BUILDING, FACING THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH.
  
 34. [ SATISFIED - CONDITION OF APPROVAL REGARDING
 SIGNAGE ] - CLARIFICATION NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED
 REGARDING THE SECONDARY VEHICULAR ENTRANCE INTO THE
 GARAGE...IT IS ONLY 15 FEET WIDE.
  
 35. [ SATISFIED ] - A TURN-AROUND SPACE NEEDS TO BE
 PROVIDED AT THE TOP LEVEL (DEAD-END) OF THE PARKING
 GARAGE.
  
 36. [ SATISFIED ] - THE BUILDING DOES NOT MEET THE
 REQUIRED 20 FOOT SETBACK REQUIREMENT OFF OF CENTREPARK
 BOULEVARD, AND THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT DOES NOT
 APPEAR TO INCLUDE THIS IN THE WAIVERS/AMENDMENT.
  
 37. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - AS DISCUSSED PREVIOUSLY,
 GROUND FLOOR UNITS SHALL HAVE DIRECT ACCESS TO THE
 PUBLIC WALKWAY, AS WELL AS THE OPEN SPACE TO THE WEST
 ALONG THE CANAL.
  
 37.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - CAN THE ALTERNATIVE BE SHOWN ON
 THE SITE PLAN AS WELL?
  
 38. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - AS DISCUSSED PREVIOUSLY,
 A PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY OR RECREATION TRAIL WITH
 LANDSCAPING, SEATING AREAS, ETC. SHALL BE PROVIDED
 ALONG THE CANAL, CONNECTING CENTREPARK BOULEVARD WITH
 CENTREPARK DRIVE NORTH/EAST TO CREATE A NETWORK OF
 AMENITIES FOR USE BY RESIDENTS, ETC.
  
 38.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - STAFF WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS THE
 EXTENSION OF THE PROPOSED WALKWAY ALL THE WAY TO
 CENTREPARK DRIVE NORTH.
  
 39. [ SATISFIED ] - STAFF WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS THE
 APPLICANT'S PROPOSED MITIGATION STRATEGY FOR THE SHADE
 TREE WAIVER. WHAT OFF-SITE LOCATIONS ARE PROPOSED? HAS
 ANY CONSIDERATION BEEN MADE TO ENHANCE THE MEDIAN IN
 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE AT CENTREPARK'S MAIN ENTRANCE?
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X
 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE NOVEMBER 17, 2020,
 PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE
 SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED
 DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 25, 2020.
  
 G) TO BE PLACED ON THE NOVEMBER 17, 2020, PLANNING
 BOARD AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO
 LATER THAN NOVEMBER 2, 2020. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM, AND
 BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
 CITY?S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; SUCH
 REQUIREMENTS ARE ALSO PROVIDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE
 PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED ABOVE.
  
 H) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT
 DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE
 COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-09-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 07-09-2020 Time 09:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 07-09-2020 Time 09:43 Sent To  
Notes
2020-07-09 11:07:03PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: JULY 9, 2020
 PROJECT NO.: Z19110010
 CASE NO.: PB 791II
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - PLEASE CLARIFY THE
 METHODOLOGY REGARDING THE PARKING CALCULATION. A SHARED
 PARKING CALCULATION IS BEING USED, BUT A PARKING STUDY
 HAS ALSO BEEN PROVIDED TO JUSTIFY A FURTHER REDUCTION
 IN THE REQUIRED PARKING. AS SUCH, THE APPLICATION WOULD
 NEED TO BE AMENDED TO SHOW THAT A PARKING WAIVER IS
 BEING REQUESTED. PARKING WAIVERS WITHIN A PLANNED
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL COMPLY WITH SEC. 94-207(B)(13) OF THE
 CITY?S ZLDRS.
  
 1.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - STAFF WOULD LIKE CLARIFICATION OR
 HAVE FURTHER DISCUSSION TO UNDERSTAND THE SHARED
 PARKING CALCUALTION THAT IS BEING SHOWN.
  
 2. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - PLEASE PROVIDE CLARIFICATION AS
 TO HOW THE CONFLICTS WITH FPL, AS STATED IN THEIR
 LETTER (NOVEMBER 5, 2019) WILL BE ADDRESSED.
  
 2.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - A PORTION OF THE BUILDING IS
 SHOWN ENROACHING INTO AN EXISTING FPL EASEMENT NEAR THE
 INTERSECTION.
  
 3. [ SATISFIED ] - SITE PLAN SHALL IDENTIFY THE
 VISIBILITY TRIANGLE AT THE CORNER OF CENTREPARK
 BOULEVARD AND CENTREPARK DRIVE EAST. NO ENCROACHMENTS
 BETWEEN 18 INCHES AND EIGHT (8) FEET SHALL BE WITHIN
 THIS AREA.
  
 4. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - PLEASE PROVIDE
 CLARIFICATION ON HOW TRASH WILL BE MANAGED AND PICKED
 UP.
  
 4.1. [ NEW COMMENT ] - PLEASE PROVIDE CONFIRMATION FROM
 THE CITY'S PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT THAT PROVIDED
 PICK-UP WILL BE PERMITTED.
  
 5. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - PARKING DETAIL ON SHEET
 SP-1 IS INCORRECT.
  
 5.1. [ SATISFIED ] - THE NOTE INDICATES TWO (2) FEET TO
 THE BACK OF THE WHEEL STOP, BUT THE DIMENSION LINE
 INDICATES THREE (3) FEET.
  
 5.2. [ SATISFIED ] - THE LENGTH OF THE STALL IS
 DIMENSIONED AT 28 FEET; THIS SHOULD BE 18 FEET.
  
 5.3. [ SATISFIED ] - THE WIDTH OF THE HANDICAP STALL IS
 DIMENSIONED AT 19 FEET; THIS SHOULD BE 12 FEET.
  
 5.4. [ SATISIFIED ] - THE WIDTH OF THE HANDICAP AISLE
 IS DIMENSIONED AT EIGHT (8) FEET; THIS SHOULD BE FIVE
 (5) FEET.
  
 5.5 [ NEW COMMENT ] - THE STRIPING FOR THE HANDICAP
 ACCESS AISLE IS INCORRECT.
  
 6. [ SATISFIED ] - THE PARKING CONFIGURATION SHOWN ON
 THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.
  
 7. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - THERE APPEARS TO BE A NUMBER OF
 LOCATIONS WHERE THE STRUCTURAL COLUMNS ARE ENCROACHING
 INTO THE PARKING STALL. THE COLUMNS SHALL BE CONTAINED
 ENTIRELY WITHIN THE DOUBLE-STRIPE AND NOT IMPEDE ON THE
 MINIMUM WIDTH OF THE STALL. A DETAIL MAY NEED TO BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 7.1. [ NEW COMMENT ] - ENCROACHMENTS ARE STILL SHOWN. A
 DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 8. [ NO LONGER APPLICABLE ] - THE AMENITIES PROVIDED IN
 THE DETENTION AREA HAVE NO ACCESS TO RESIDENTS/PATRONS
 OF THE BUILDING. THE ONLY SIDEWALK THAT CONNECT TO THE
 PATHWAY IS THAT WHICH HAS ACCESS TO THE TRACH ROOM, FPL
 VAULT, FIRE PUMP, ETC. ACCESS SHALL BE PROVIDE TO THE
 PUBLIC WALKWAY, CAF? AND/OR LOBBY AND LEASING AREA.
  
 9. [ NO LONGER APPLICABLE ] - TANDEM PARKING SPACES
 ONLY WORK IF THEY ARE ASSIGNED TO SPECIFIC UNITS. AS
 SUCH, THESE SPACES CANNOT BE CONSIDERED TOWARD THE
 SHARED PARKING CALCULATION AS THEY WOULD NOT BE
 AVAILABLE FOR USE BY MULTIPLE OWNERS/TENANTS.
  
 10. [ NO LONGER APPLICABLE ] - TANDEM PARKING SPACES
 SHALL NOT HAVE WHEEL STOPS IN BETWEEN THE TWO SPACES.
  
 11. [ NO LONGER APPLICABLE ] - THERE'S SOME CONCERN
 WITH REGARDING THE SINGLE PARKING SPACE IMMEDIATELY
 ADJACENT TO THE LOADING AREA ON THE FIRST LEVEL AS IT
 SEEMS THAT IT WOULD RESULT IN CONFLICTS IN INCOMING
 VEHICLES AS THE SPACE IS CONCEALED BEHIND THE WALL.
  
 12. [ NO LONGER APPLICABLE ] - THERE APPEARS TO BE
 INSUFFICIENT BACK-OUT SPACE OF THE FIRST PARKING SPACE
 AS YOU ENTER THE GARAGE ON THE FIRST LEVEL (NORTH
 SIDE).
  
 13. [ PARTIALLY SATISIFED ] - DIMENSIONS OF BALCONY
 ENCROACHMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED. BALCONIES SHALL NOT
 PROJECT MORE THAN THREE (3) FEET INTO ANY REQUIRED
 SETBACK.
  
 13.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - DIMENSIONS NEED TO BE PROVIDED
 FOR ALL BALCONIES, ETC. THAT ARE ENCROACHING INTO A
 SETBACK.
  
 14. [ NO LONGER APPLICABLE ] - STAFF DOESN?T QUITE
 UNDERSTAND THE CONCEPT OF HAVING THE ?PLAZA? DESIGN IN
 FRONT OF THE GROUND FLOOR RESIDENTIAL UNITS ALONG
 CENTREPARK BLVD. WALK-UP UNIT DESIGNS SHOULD BE
 PROVIDED, BUT I BELIEVE SOME LEVEL OF PRIVACY NEEDS TO
 BE ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE DESIGN.
  
 15. [ NO LONGER APPLICABLE ] - WHAT ARE THE ELEVATION
 DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE CENTREPARK BOULEVARD PLAZA AREA
 AND THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION OF THE GROUND FLOOR
 UNITS/RETAIL? ARE STEPS NEEDED? ACCESSIBLE ROUTES?
  
 16. [ SATISFIED ] - THE LOCATION OF THE BIKE STORAGE
 AREAS IN THE GARAGE DO NOT SEEM CONDUCIVE FOR USE BY
 THE RESIDENTS.
  
 17. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - SETBACKS SHALL BE
 MEASURED FROM THE PROPERTY LINE TO THE CLOSEST POINT OF
 THE BUILDING. AS THE FITNESS ROOM EXTEND BEYOND THE
 WALL OF THE PARKING GARAGE, THE SETBACK SHALL BE
 MEASURED TO THE EXTERIOR WALL OF THE FITNESS ROOM.
  
 17.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - THE BOLD LINE ON THE SITE PLAN
 DOES NOT APPEAR TO MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS, AND
 THERE APPEARS TO BE STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS EXTENDING INTO
 THE AREA THAT IS BEING IDENTIFIED AS THE SETBACK.
  
 18. [ SATISFIED ] - THE FLOOR PLAN, SITE PLAN, AND
 ELEVATIONS DO NOT SEEM TO CORRESPOND, NOR SHOW ALL
 ELEMENTS OF THE BUILDING. THERE IS INCONSISTENCIES IN
 THE GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN, DECORATIVE FA?ADE
 ELEMENTS, BALCONIES, STRUCTURAL COLUMNS, ETC.
  
 19. [ NO LONGER APPLICABLE ] - DOES STAIR #1 NEED TO
 HAVE DIRECT EGRESS TO THE OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING? THE
 SITE PLAN SHOWS A DOOR EXITING THE STAIRWELL TO THE
 CENTREPARK BLVD. PLAZA, BUT THE FLOOR PLAN SHOWS THE
 FIRE COMMAND CENTER IN THIS LOCATION WITH EGRESS ONLY
 THROUGH THE LOBBY.
  
 20. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS NEED TO
 BE MADE FOR THE FACADES OF THE GARAGE THAT FACE THE
 CANAL AND THE ADJACENT OFFICE BUILDING.
  
 20.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - AS DISCUSSED IN RECENT
 CONVERSATIONS, STAFF NEEDS A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF
 THE FACADE OF THE GARAGE, HOW THE LANDSCAPING PLAYS
 INTO ENHANCING THE FACADE, ETC. AN ARCHITECTURAL
 RENDERING SHOWING THE DESIGN, LANDSCAPING, ETC. SHALL
 BE PROVIDED FOR FURTHER REVIEW, AND ENHANCEMENTS TO THE
 FACADE MAY BE REQUIRED.
  
 21. [ SATISFIED ] - PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PROJECT WILL
 BE SUBJECT TO THE CENTREPARK AFFORDABLE AND WORKFORCE
 HOUSING POLICY THAT WAS APPROVED WITH THE ADOPTION OF
 RESOLUTION NO. 98-17. AS REQUIRED BY THE POLICY, THE
 APPLICATION SHALL PROVIDE A WRITTEN CERTIFICATION AS
 PART OF THE SITE PLAN APPLICATION IDENTIFYING WHICH
 UNITS WILL BE OFFERED AS WORKFORCE HOUSING UNITS.
 PLEASE REFER TO THE POLICY FOR ALL UNIT RESTRICTIONS
 THAT ARE REQUIRED.
  
 22. [ NOT SATISIFED ] - PLEASE NOTE THAT PURSUANT TO
 RESOLUTION NO. 98-17, UPON OBTAINING SITE PLAN
 APPROVAL, THE APPLICANT SHALL CONTRIBUTE $150/UNIT TO
 THE WORKFORCE HOUSING TRUST FUND, UNLESS THE CITY
 CHOOSES TO USE IT TOWARD THE DEVELOPMENT OF A TRANSIT
 PLAN TO PROVIDE CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN DOWNTOWN AND
 CENTREPARK. IF THIS OPTION IS CHOSEN, THEN THE
 APPLICANT SHALL WORK WITH THE CITY ON THE DEVELOPMENT
 OF THIS PLAN.
  
 23. [ PARTIALLY SATISIFED ] - PLEASE NOTE THAT PURSUANT
 TO SECTION 5, CONDITION #11 OF RESOLUTION NO. 97-17,
 ALL IRRIGATION SHALL BE PROVIDED UTILIZING THE LAKES
 (NO POTABLE WATER SHALL BE UTILIZED). PLEASE PROVIDE A
 NOTE ON THE PLANS INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH SUCH
 PROVISION.
  
 23.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - THE IRRIGATION NOTE SHOULD BE
 ADDED TO THE LANDSCAPE PLANS AS WELL.
  
 24. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - PLEASE NOTE THAT PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 5, CONDITION #13 OF RESOLUTION NO. 97-17,
 WATER-SAVING PLUMBING FIXTURES SHALL BE INSTALLED
 THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT. PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE ON THE
 PLANS INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH SUCH PROVISION.
  
 25. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - PLEASE PROVIDE A TURNING RADIUS
 ANALYSIS FOR THE UTILIZATION OF THE LOADING AREA AND
 DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR.
  
 25.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - AN ANALYSIS NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED
 FOR ALL OF THE LOADING AREAS THAT ARE SHOWN (INSIDE THE
 GARAGE AS WELL AS ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF THE
 BUILDING). INGRESS/EGRESS INTO THESE AREAS APPEARS TO
 BE VERY DIFFICULT, IF EVEN POSSIBLE.
  
 26. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - INTERNAL CONNECTION
 SHOULD BE PROVIDED BETWEEN THE RESIDENTIAL
 LOBBY/LEASING AND THE PROPOSED CAFE/RETAIL.
  
 26.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - FOR OPTION B, IS THERE ANY WAY
 TO RELOCATE THE WESTERN ENTRANCE OF THE RETAIL SPACE SO
 THAT IT CONNECTS WITH THE RESIDENTIAL LOBBY?
  
 27. [ NEW COMMENT ] - MULTIPLE IMPROVEMENTS ARE BEING
 SHOWN IN THE UTILITY EASEMENT THAT IS ADJACENT TO THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 28. [ NEW COMMENT ] - ELEVATIONS INFORMATION NEEDS TO
 BE PROVIDED FOR ALL STAIRS THAT ARE ENCROACHING INTO A
 REQUIRED SETBACK.
  
 29. [ NEW COMMENT ] - BIKE PARKING FACILITIES SHALL BE
 PROVIDED FOR THE THE NON-RESIDENTIAL USES.
  
 30. [ NEW COMMENT ] - AS DISCUSSED PREVIIOUSLY, THE
 COURTYARD NEEDS TO BE FURTHER DESIGNED AND
 CLARIFICATION NEEDS TO BE MADE ABOUT THE TREATMENT OF
 THE COURTYARD ADJACENT TO THE TRASH BIN HOLDING AREA,
 LOADING ZONE, PARKING GARAGE, ETC.
  
 31. [ NEW COMMENT ] - MORE DETAIL NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED
 FOR STAFF TO UNDERSTAND THE AREA AT THE NORTHEAST
 CORNER OF THE BUILDING (TRASH BIN HOLDING AREA, LOADING
 DOCKS, ROLLING GATE, ETC.). IT IS HARD TO DISTIGUISH
 WHAT IS WITHIN THE BUILDING VERSUS WHAT IS OUTSIDE.
  
 32. [ NEW COMMENT ] - ADDITIONAL DETIAL NEEDS TO BE
 PROVIDED REGARDING THE ROLLING GATE AT THE LOADING
 DOCKS. IT APPEARS THAT THE GATE BLOCKS A DOORWAY TO THE
 WEST. DOES THE GATE ROLL TO THE EAST? IF SO, IT MAY
 ENRCOACH INTO THE PARKING SPACES.
  
 33. [ NEW COMMENT ] - AS DISCUSSED PREVIOUSLY, STAFF
 HAS CONCERNS WITH THE OPEN LOADING DOCKS ON THE NORTH
 SIDE OF THE BUILDING, FACING THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH.
  
 34. [ NEW COMMENT ] - CLARIFICATION NEEDS TO BE
 PROVIDED REGARDING THE SECONDARY VEHICULAR ENTRANCE
 INTO THE GARAGE...IT IS ONLY 15 FEET WIDE.
  
 35. [ NEW COMMENT ] - A TURN-AROUND SPACE NEEDS TO BE
 PROVIDED AT THE TOP LEVEL (DEAD-END) OF THE PARKING
 GARAGE.
  
 36. [ NEW COMMENT ] - THE BUILDING DOES NOT MEET THE
 REQUIRED 20 FOOT SETBACK REQUIREMENT OFF OF CENTREPARK
 BOULEVARD, AND THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT DOES NOT
 APPEAR TO INCLUDE THIS IN THE WAIVERS/AMENDMENT.
  
 37. [ NEW COMMENT ] - AS DISCUSSED PREVIOUSLY, GROUND
 FLOOR UNITS SHALL HAVE DIRECT ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC
 WALKWAY, AS WELL AS THE OPEN SPACE TO THE WEST ALONG
 THE CANAL.
  
 38. [ NEW COMMENT ] - AS DISCUSSED PREVIOUSLY, A
 PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY OR RECREATION TRAIL WITH
 LANDSCAPING, SEATING AREAS, ETC. SHALL BE PROVIDED
 ALONG THE CANAL, CONNECTING CENTREPARK BOULEVARD WITH
 CENTREPARK DRIVE NORTH/EAST TO CREATE A NETWORK OF
 AMENITIES FOR USE BY RESIDENTS, ETC.
  
 39. [ NEW COMMENT ] - STAFF WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS THE
 APPLICANT'S PROPOSED MITIGATION STRATEGY FOR THE SHADE
 TREE WAIVER. WHAT OFF-SITE LOCATIONS ARE PROPOSED? HAS
 ANY CONSIDERATION BEEN MADE TO ENHANCE THE MEDIAN IN
 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE AT CENTREPARK'S MAIN ENTRANCE?
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X
 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE SEPTEMBER 15,
 2020, PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE
 SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED
 DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN JULY 24, 2020.
  
 G) TO BE PLACED ON THE SEPTEMBER 15, 2020, PLANNING
 BOARD AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO
 LATER THAN AUGUST 31, 2020. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM, AND
 BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
 CITY?S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; SUCH
 REQUIREMENTS ARE ALSO PROVIDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE
 PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED ABOVE.
  
 H) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT
 DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE
 COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-11-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 12-11-2019 Time 11:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 12-11-2019 Time 11:10 Sent To  
Notes
2019-12-11 11:11:26PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 12.11.2019
 PROJECT NO.: Z19110010
 CASE NO.: PB 791II
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. PLEASE CLARIFY THE METHODOLOGY REGARDING THE PARKING
 CALCULATION. A SHARED PARKING CALCULATION IS BEING
 USED, BUT A PARKING STUDY HAS ALSO BEEN PROVIDED TO
 JUSTIFY A FURTHER REDUCTION IN THE REQUIRED PARKING. AS
 SUCH, THE APPLICATION WOULD NEED TO BE AMENDED TO SHOW
 THAT A PARKING WAIVER IS BEING REQUESTED. PARKING
 WAIVERS WITHIN A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SHALL COMPLY WITH
 SEC. 94-207(B)(13) OF THE CITY?S ZLDRS.
  
 2. PLEASE PROVIDE CLARIFICATION AS TO HOW THE CONFLICTS
 WITH FPL, AS STATED IN THEIR LETTER (NOVEMBER 5, 2019)
 WILL BE ADDRESSED.
  
 3. SITE PLAN SHALL IDENTIFY THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE AT
 THE CORNER OF CENTREPARK BOULEVARD AND CENTREPARK DRIVE
 EAST. NO ENCROACHMENTS BETWEEN 18 INCHES AND EIGHT (8)
 FEET SHALL BE WITHIN THIS AREA.
  
 4. PLEASE PROVIDE CLARIFICATION ON HOW TRASH WILL BE
 MANAGED AND PICKED UP.
  
 5. PARKING DETAIL ON SHEET SP-1 IS INCORRECT.
  
 5.1. THE NOTE INDICATES TWO (2) FEET TO THE BACK OF THE
 WHEEL STOP, BUT THE DIMENSION LINE INDICATES THREE (3)
 FEET.
  
 5.2. THE LENGTH OF THE STALL IS DIMENSIONED AT 28 FEET;
 THIS SHOULD BE 18 FEET.
  
 5.3. THE WIDTH OF THE HANDICAP STALL IS DIMENSIONED AT
 19 FEET; THIS SHOULD BE 12 FEET.
  
 5.4. THE WIDTH OF THE HANDICAP AISLE IS DIMENSIONED AT
 EIGHT (8) FEET; THIS SHOULD BE FIVE (5) FEET.
  
 6. THE PARKING CONFIGURATION SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN
 DOES NOT MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.
  
 7. THERE APPEARS TO BE A NUMBER OF LOCATIONS WHERE THE
 STRUCTURAL COLUMNS ARE ENCROACHING INTO THE PARKING
 STALL. THE COLUMNS SHALL BE CONTAINED ENTIRELY WITHIN
 THE DOUBLE-STRIPE AND NOT IMPEDE ON THE MINIMUM WIDTH
 OF THE STALL. A DETAIL MAY NEED TO BE PROVIDED.
  
 8. THE AMENITIES PROVIDED IN THE DETENTION AREA HAVE NO
 ACCESS TO RESIDENTS/PATRONS OF THE BUILDING. THE ONLY
 SIDEWALK THAT CONNECT TO THE PATHWAY IS THAT WHICH HAS
 ACCESS TO THE TRACH ROOM, FPL VAULT, FIRE PUMP, ETC.
 ACCESS SHALL BE PROVIDE TO THE PUBLIC WALKWAY, CAF?
 AND/OR LOBBY AND LEASING AREA.
  
 9. TANDEM PARKING SPACES ONLY WORK IF THEY ARE ASSIGNED
 TO SPECIFIC UNITS. AS SUCH, THESE SPACES CANNOT BE
 CONSIDERED TOWARD THE SHARED PARKING CALCULATION AS
 THEY WOULD NOT BE AVAILABLE FOR USE BY MULTIPLE
 OWNERS/TENANTS.
  
 10. TANDEM PARKING SPACES SHALL NOT HAVE WHEEL STOPS IN
 BETWEEN THE TWO SPACES.
  
 11. THERE?S SOME CONCERN WITH REGARDING THE SINGLE
 PARKING SPACE IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE LOADING AREA
 ON THE FIRST LEVEL AS IT SEEMS THAT IT WOULD RESULT IN
 CONFLICTS IN INCOMING VEHICLES AS THE SPACE IS
 CONCEALED BEHIND THE WALL.
  
 12. THERE APPEARS TO BE INSUFFICIENT BACK-OUT SPACE OF
 THE FIRST PARKING SPACE AS YOU ENTER THE GARAGE ON THE
 FIRST LEVEL (NORTH SIDE).
  
 13. DIMENSIONS OF BALCONY ENCROACHMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED. BALCONIES SHALL NOT PROJECT MORE THAN THREE
 (3) FEET INTO ANY REQUIRED SETBACK.
  
 14. STAFF DOESN?T QUITE UNDERSTAND THE CONCEPT OF
 HAVING THE ?PLAZA? DESIGN IN FRONT OF THE GROUND FLOOR
 RESIDENTIAL UNITS ALONG CENTREPARK BLVD. WALK-UP UNIT
 DESIGNS SHOULD BE PROVIDED, BUT I BELIEVE SOME LEVEL OF
 PRIVACY NEEDS TO BE ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE DESIGN.
  
 15. WHAT ARE THE ELEVATION DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE
 CENTREPARK BOULEVARD PLAZA AREA AND THE FINISHED FLOOR
 ELEVATION OF THE GROUND FLOOR UNITS/RETAIL? ARE STEPS
 NEEDED? ACCESSIBLE ROUTES?
  
 16. THE LOCATION OF THE BIKE STORAGE AREAS IN THE
 GARAGE DO NOT SEEM CONDUCIVE FOR USE BY THE RESIDENTS.
  
 17. SETBACKS SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE PROPERTY LINE
 TO THE CLOSEST POINT OF THE BUILDING. AS THE FITNESS
 ROOM EXTEND BEYOND THE WALL OF THE PARKING GARAGE, THE
 SETBACK SHALL BE MEASURED TO THE EXTERIOR WALL OF THE
 FITNESS ROOM.
  
 18. THE FLOOR PLAN, SITE PLAN, AND ELEVATIONS DO NOT
 SEEM TO CORRESPOND, NOR SHOW ALL ELEMENTS OF THE
 BUILDING. THERE IS INCONSISTENCIES IN THE GROUND LEVEL
 FLOOR PLAN, DECORATIVE FA?ADE ELEMENTS, BALCONIES,
 STRUCTURAL COLUMNS, ETC.
  
 19. DOES STAIR #1 NEED TO HAVE DIRECT EGRESS TO THE
 OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING? THE SITE PLAN SHOWS A DOOR
 EXITING THE STAIRWELL TO THE CENTREPARK BLVD. PLAZA,
 BUT THE FLOOR PLAN SHOWS THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER IN
 THIS LOCATION WITH EGRESS ONLY THROUGH THE LOBBY.
  
 20. DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS NEED TO BE MADE FOR THE
 FACADES OF THE GARAGE THAT FACE THE CANAL AND THE
 ADJACENT OFFICE BUILDING.
  
 21. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE
 CENTREPARK AFFORDABLE AND WORKFORCE HOUSING POLICY THAT
 WAS APPROVED WITH THE ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 98-17.
 AS REQUIRED BY THE POLICY, THE APPLICATION SHALL
 PROVIDE A WRITTEN CERTIFICATION AS PART OF THE SITE
 PLAN APPLICATION IDENTIFYING WHICH UNITS WILL BE
 OFFERED AS WORKFORCE HOUSING UNITS. PLEASE REFER TO THE
 POLICY FOR ALL UNIT RESTRICTIONS THAT ARE REQUIRED.
  
 22. PLEASE NOTE THAT PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 98-17,
 UPON OBTAINING SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE APPLICANT SHALL
 CONTRIBUTE $150/UNIT TO THE WORKFORCE HOUSING TRUST
 FUND, UNLESS THE CITY CHOOSES TO USE IT TOWARD THE
 DEVELOPMENT OF A TRANSIT PLAN TO PROVIDE CONNECTIVITY
 BETWEEN DOWNTOWN AND CENTREPARK. IF THIS OPTION IS
 CHOSEN, THEN THE APPLICANT SHALL WORK WITH THE CITY ON
 THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PLAN.
  
 23. PLEASE NOTE THAT PURSUANT TO SECTION 5, CONDITION
 #11 OF RESOLUTION NO. 97-17, ALL IRRIGATION SHALL BE
 PROVIDED UTILIZING THE LAKES (NO POTABLE WATER SHALL BE
 UTILIZED). PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE ON THE PLANS
 INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH SUCH PROVISION.
  
 24. PLEASE NOTE THAT PURSUANT TO SECTION 5, CONDITION
 #13 OF RESOLUTION NO. 97-17, WATER-SAVING PLUMBING
 FIXTURES SHALL BE INSTALLED THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT.
 PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE ON THE PLANS INDICATING
 COMPLIANCE WITH SUCH PROVISION.
  
 25. PLEASE PROVIDE A TURNING RADIUS ANALYSIS FOR THE
 UTILIZATION OF THE LOADING AREA AND DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR.
  
 26. INTERNAL CONNECTION SHOULD BE PROVIDED BETWEEN THE
 RESIDENTIAL LOBBY/LEASING AND THE PROPOSED CAF?/RETAIL.
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X
 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE FEBRUARY 18, 2020,
 PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE
 SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED
 DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 27, 2019.
  
 G) TO BE PLACED ON THE FEBRUARY 18, 2020, PLANNING
 BOARD AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO
 LATER THAN FEBRUARY 3, 2020. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM, AND
 BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
 CITY?S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; SUCH
 REQUIREMENTS ARE ALSO PROVIDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE
 PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED ABOVE.
  
 H) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT
 DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE
 COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved