Plan Review Details - Project Z19100014
Plan Review Stops For Project Z19100014
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-12-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 11-12-2019 Time 20:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 11-12-2019 Time 20:05 Sent To  
Notes
2019-11-12 20:13:00DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. FLOOR PLANS
 A1.02 THROUGH A1.05 SHOW REGULAR PARKING SPACES THAT
 ARE CLOSER TO THE ELEVAVATOR LOBBY THAN THE THE
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE. PER SECTION 208.3 OF
 FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES
 ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF
 TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE.
 THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL COMPLY
 WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE.
  
 3. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. NONE OF THE
 ACCESSIBLE PAKING SPACES ARE DESIGNATED AS VAN
 ACCESSIBLE PARKINGS. 2 SUCH SPACES ARE REQUIRED. PER
 SECTION 208.2.4 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN
 EVERY SIX REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN
 A PARKING STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND
 DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98
 INCHES AT SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)
  
 4. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
 NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
 MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
 BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
 EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
 TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
 OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 5. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 6. 8TH FLOOR POOL AND POOL DECK EGRESS WIDTHS FOR DOORS
 AND STAIRS. BASED ON THE CUMULATIVE NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS
 ON THE POOL DECK AND IN THE POOL AND 8TH FLOOR ROOMS,
 CHECK THAT THE EGRESS DOORS AND STAIRS ARE SUFFICIENTLY
 WIDE.
  
 7. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE
 REQUIRED. PLEASE CONTACT JEFFREY ODOMS, UTILITIES O&M
 SUPERINTENDENT, PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT, FATS OILS
 AND GREASE DIVISION, AT (561) 822-2172, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 8. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 9. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
 CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.
  
 10. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
 AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
 CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
 THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.
  
 11. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
 WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
 HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT
 MICHAEL ORIO, GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494
 1080, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 12. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
 TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE
 ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 4 Status P Date 06-22-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 06-22-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 06-22-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-06-22 07:34:37PASSED WITH PROVISO: SCALE AND MEASUREMENT ICON MISSING
 FROM UTILITY PLAN. PLEASE ADD.
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 3 Status F Date 03-04-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 03-04-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 03-04-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-03-04 08:39:54COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORD, ENG SERVICES
 ? 561-494-1098, [email protected]
  
 PLEASE RECHECK AS-BUILTS AND CONFIRM CORRECT SIZE AND
 MATERIAL OF EXISTING SANITARY LINE IN ALLEY WHERE
 SANITARY TAP IS PROPOSED.
  
 PLEASE UPDATE ALL CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAILS TO MOST
 CURRENT VERSIONS. CONTACT [email protected] FOR ASBUILTS
 AND CURRENT CAD FILES OF CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAILS &
 NOTES.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE ELEVATION CONVERSION NOTE ON ALL UTILITY
 AND PAVING SHEETS.
  
 PLEASE INCLUDE FIRE AND IRRIGATION IF ANY IN WATER
 DEMAND TABLE ON UTILITY SHEET.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD
 CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES,
 PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]:
  
 -PLEASE VERIFY DOMESTIC METER AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY ARE
 OUTSIDE OF BUILDING.
  
 -UTILITY PLAN SAYS IRRIGATION METER IS 0.5INCH. WPB
 UTILITIES DOES NOT OFFER A 0.5INCH IRRIGATION METER.
  
 -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL: LABEL IRRIGATION
 WATER SERVICE PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL TYPE, UPDATE WATER
 SERVICE STANDARD DETAILS TO NEWEST REVISION, SHOW WATER
 SERVICE TAPS FOR NORTH SIDE OF GARDENIA ON UTILITY
 PLAN.
  
 -PROPERTY OWNER WILL BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT AND RECORD A
 BACKFLOW COVENANT.
  
 -CANNOT FIND REMOVAL OF THE EXISTING WATER SERVICES AND
 METER BOXES ON GARDENIA AND DIXIE ON DEMO OR UTILITY
 PLANS. PLEASE ADD.
  
 -THE SIZE OF THE DOMESTIC AND IRRIGATION METER COMBINED
 IS LARGER THAN THE TAP. PLEASE VERIFY BUILDING WILL
 HAVE SUFFICIENT WATER IF IRRIGATION IS RUNNING.
  
 -THERE IS AN EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX AT THE EAST
 SIDE OF THE ALLEY THAT LOOKS TO BE CONFLICTING WITH THE
 CURB AND SIDEWALK. PLEASE RESOLVE.
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 05-07-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 05-07-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 05-07-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-05-07 10:51:33COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORD, ENG SERVICES
 ? 561-494-1098, [email protected]
  
 PLEASE RECHECK AS-BUILTS AND SHOW CORRECT SIZE AND
 MATERIAL OF EXISTING SANITARY LINE IN ALLEY WHERE
 SANITARY TAP IS PROPOSED.
  
 PLEASE UPDATE ALL CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAILS TO MOST
 CURRENT VERSIONS.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD
 CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES,
 PLEASE CONTACT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]:
  
 -FOR THE DEMAND CALCULATIONS TABLE, A FEW ITEMS SEEMED
 ODD:
 ~IT LISTS SUPPORT RESTAURAN?, BUT IT DID NOT GIVE ANY
 GPD FOR IT.
 ~IT LISTS 1 PENTHOUSE, BUT THEN LISTS 2 PENTHOUSES FOR
 SEWER.
 ~DID NOT LIST IRRIGATION OR FIRE.
  
 -ON GARDENIA ARE THE LIMITS OF THE PAVEMENT RESTORATION
 COMPLIANT WITH CITY DETAIL?
  
 -FOR THE 6 IN. FIRELINE, RECOMMEND ELIMINATING THE 6
 IN. GATE VALVE IN THE SIDEWALK AND JUST MAKE THE 6 IN.
 GATE VALVE IN THE STREET THE POINT OF SERVICE.
  
 -PLANTER TO EAST SIDE OF 6 IN. FIRELINE SERVICE LOOKS
 CLOSE? PLEASE ADD ROOT BARRIER.
  
 -HARD TO SEE FIRE HYDRANT ON GARDENIA AND LOOKS TO BE
 IN CONFLICT WITH SOME KIND OF STORM-WATER UTILITY.
 PLEASE ALSO DO NOT LOCATE VALVE OR HYDRANT IN CONCRETE
 DRIVEWAY APPROACH.
  
 -FOR WATER SERVICE NEAR NW CORNER OF PROPERTY RECOMMEND
 ELIMINATING REDUNDANT GATE VALVE IN SIDEWALK.
  
 -FOR 10 FT. WATER EASEMENT PLEASE RELABEL AS UTILITY
 EASEMENT AND PROVIDE BOTH DIMENSIONS.
  
 -NEED SEPARATE ENLARGED/ZOOMED PLAN FOR THE WATER
 SERVICE SETUP INSIDE THE UTILITY EASEMENT -> CANNOT SEE
 HOW THE WATER SERVICES ARE BEING CONSTRUCTED.
  
 -HARD TO TELL WHICH PARTS OF ALLEY PAVEMENT RESTORATION
 IS TAKING PLACE. IS THE WHOLE ALLEYWAY BEING MILLED AND
 RESURFACED TO THE E & W PROPERTY LIMITS?
  
 -DO NOT SEE DATUM INFORMATION OR PROPERTY ADDRESS
 LISTED.
  
 THANKS,
  
 MARK HURLEY
 FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC UTILITIES
 561-822-2262
  
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-12-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 11-12-2019 Time   Rev Time 4.00
Received By rrossano Date 11-12-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-11-12 15:17:121. PLEASE RESPOND IN WRITING TO ALL COMMENTS WITH Z
 PERMIT NUMBER, PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS.
 2. PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC
 RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF
 YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
 MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
 IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
 [email protected] OR 561-494-1040 FOR FURTHER
 ASSISTANCE.
 3. PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS
 OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES,
 INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND
 SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES,
 METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE
 SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING
 GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS,
 ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL
 INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER
 LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN
 VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
 PLEASE SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT
 MATERIAL. ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL
 EXISTING AND PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT,
 INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &
 TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL
 UTILITY CROSSINGS.
 4. CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY
 ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
 RIGHT OF WAY.
 5. PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE
 DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB
 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION).
 6. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM
 AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE
 PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER.
 7. SHOW VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION INFORMATION
 (NAVD 88 AND NGVD 29).
 8. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND
 IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED
 AREAS.
 9. PLEASE RELOCATE ONSITE CLEANOUTS CLOSER TO PROPERTY
 LINE FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
 10. COORDINATE WITH MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE
 SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING
 PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT
 HIM AT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]
 11. PROVIDE DEDICATED UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS
 FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS.
 12. PLEASE CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS ARE NEEDED.
 13. PLEASE CLEARLY LABEL CITY OF WPB POINTS OF SERVICE
 FOR UTILITY CONNECTIONS.
 14. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION OF WATER
 METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION. INCLUDE EASEMENT
 DEDICATION FOR WATER METER.
 15. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE CALLOUT
 DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA AND FIRE BACKFLOW
 PREVENTER AS DCDA. SPECIFY LEAD FREE DESIGN ON ALL
 BACKFLOWS.
 16. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES
 OF WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
 17. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING
 APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT
 SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING
 SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED
 LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
  
 SHEET C-09:
 1. ADD PAVEMENT RESTORATION NOTE PER CITY OF WPB
 STANDARD DETAIL GC-9; CALLOUT LIMITS OF PAVEMENT
 RESTORATION.
 2. EXISTING SANITARY LINE IN ALLEY IS 8 IN. C-900, NOT
 12 IN. VCP. REVISE PLANS AND REVIEW CONNECTIONS.
 3. EXISTING WATER SERVICE ON GARDENIA ST. IS 8 IN. DIP,
 NOT CONCRETE PIPE. REVISE PLANS AND REVIEW CONNECTIONS.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, CITY OF
 WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR:
  
 1. FIRE HYDRANT IS SHOWN IN MIDDLE OF SIDEWALK ->
 RECOMMEND MAKING IT SAFER EITHER BY RELOCATING IT IN
 BETWEEN PLANTERS OR WITHIN A GRASS AREA. SHOULD ALSO
 CHECK TO SEE IF THE FIRE HYDRANT IS REQUIRED. THERE ARE
 EXISTING HYDRANTS AT THE EAST INTERSECTION AND ANOTHER
 ONE AT THE WEST.
 2. DOMESTIC AND IRRIGATION METER APPEAR TO BE INSIDE
 THE BUILDING. THOSE NEED TO BE OUTSIDE IN A LOW/NON
 TRAFFIC AREA. RECOMMEND RELOCATING WATER SERVICES, OR
 CHANGING BUILDING/PROPERTY DESIGN/FOOTPRINT TO ALLOW A
 GRASS AREA WHERE THE METERS CAN BE LOCATED. THAT AREA
 SHOULD HAVE SMALL UTILITY EASEMENT CREATED AROUND IT IF
 PROTRUDING INTO PROPERTY LINES. IF DOMESTIC METER IS 3
 IN. OR GREATER, SHOULD BE AN ABOVE-GROUND INSTALLATION.
 3. DOMESTIC AND IRRIGATION BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES APPEAR
 TO BE INSIDE THE BUILDING. THOSE SHOULD BE LOCATED
 OUTSIDE OF BUILDINGS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY AND NOT IN ANY
 ROW OR UE. THEY SHOULD NOT BE LOCATED IN MIDDLE OF
 SIDEWALK EITHER. BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES WOULD NEED BE RP
 TYPE.
 4. THERE ARE EXISTING UTILITY BOXES AROUND NORTH AND
 EAST SIDES OF PROPERTY IN THE SIDEWALK. PLAN SHOULD
 CALL THOSE OUT ALONG WITH WHAT WILL BE HAPPENING TO
 THEM (LEAVE AS IS, CUT BACK TO MAIN AND CAPPED, ETC?)
 5. FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY WITH DETECTOR METER
 APPEARS TO BE INSIDE BUILDING. NEEDS TO BE LOCATED
 OUTSIDE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY (AND NOT IN ANY ROW, UE, OR
 MIDDLE OF SIDEWALK), UNLESS CITY OF WPB FIRE DEPARTMENT
 REQUIRES IT INSIDE THE BUILDING.
 6. FDC APPEARS TO BE IN CONFLICT WITH A DOOR.
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS.
  
 RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098
 [email protected]
  
  
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 4 Status P Date 06-22-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 06-22-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 06-22-2021 Time 11:46 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 3 Status P Date 03-05-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 03-05-2021 Time 13:16 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 03-05-2021 Time 13:13 Sent To  
Notes
2021-03-05 13:16:05FIRE HAS REVIEWED THE RESUBMITTAL PACKET FOR THE
 MARRIOTT AC PROJECT AT 414 GARDENIA ST AND HAS NO
 OBJECTIONS AND APPROVES.
  
 FIRE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES NOT
 CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL
  
 FIRE SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT THE
 APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 04-27-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 04-27-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 04-27-2020 Time 12:49 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 11-06-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 11-06-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 11-06-2019 Time 15:18 Sent To  
Notes
2019-11-06 15:26:49THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
 6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,
 PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,
 INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE
 OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)
  
 7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA
 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE
 BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE
 BEING CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED
 TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE
 PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
  
 IT IS RECOMMENDED FOR HIGH RISES HAVE TWO SEPARATE FDC
 LOCATIONS REMOTELY LOCATED.
  
 PER NFPA 14
  
 6.4.5.4* FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED
 NOT MORE THAN 100 FT (30.5 M) FROM THE NEAREST FIRE
 HYDRANT CONNECTED TO AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY.
  
 PER NFPA 1
  
 18.3 WATER SUPPLIES.
  
 18.3.1* AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING
 THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE
 PROVIDED TO ALL PREMISES UPON WHICH FACILITIES,
 BUILDINGS, OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS ARE HEREAFTER
 CONSTRUCTED OR MOVED INTO THE JURISDICTION. THE
 APPROVED WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 SECTION 18.4.
  
 PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004,
 FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE
 POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF
 APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT,
 CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR
 AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER
 SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA)
 AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS
 PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS.
 FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE
 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?
  
  
 7A. THE LOCATION OF THE FIRE LINE DDCV SHALL BE LOCATED
 PER NFPA 24 AND AT LEAST 40' FROM THE BUILDING OR AS
 PER THE EXCEPTIONS PROVIDED FOR PROTECTION. CLOSE
 COORDINATION OF THE FINAL LOCATION IS REQUIRED WITH THE
 OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL, THE CITY LANDSCAPE PLANNER,
 THE CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, AND THE CITY'S URBAN
 DESIGNER.
  
 8. A CLASS ?A? NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM
 SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP
 DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND
 APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY
 INSTALLATION.
  
 9. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7
 KEYWAY SYSTEM.
  
 ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S
 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA
 B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.
  
 ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN
 WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL
 LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET
 MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER
 ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN
 AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE
 IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
 EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
 PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
 SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE
 BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND
 FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET
 OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER
 ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES.
  
 12. COMMAND ROOM
 THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1,
 CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN
 THE FOLLOWING FEATURES:
 A. SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 200 FT SQUARED WITH A MINIMUM
 DIMENSION OF 10 FT.
 B. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.
 C. A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
 ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
 D. SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL
 FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF
 EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING
 EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS AND THE LOCATION
 OF FIRE WALLS, FIRE BARRIERS, FIRE PARTITIONS, SMOKE
 BARRIERS AND SMOKE PARTITIONS
 E. A WORK TABLE.
 F. IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
 FOR THE BUILDING.
 G. THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
 CONTROL UNIT.
 H. ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION OF
 THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL
 I. STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR DISTRIBUTION
 SYSTEMS.
 J. CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS SIMULTANEOUSLY
 K. SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY
 PANELS
 L. EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS
 M. FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
 N. GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND
 TRANSFER FEATURES.
 O. PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED
 BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE
 P. CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL
 Q. ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME
 A17.1.
 R. ELEVATOR EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER SELECTOR
 SWITCH(ES), WHERE EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER IS
 PROVIDED
 11.8.6* EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER.
 11.8.6.1 AN EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE PROVIDED
 IN A
 LOCATION APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.
 11.8.6.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL CONTAIN THE
 FOLLOWING:
 (1) VOICE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM PANELS AND CONTROLS
 (2) FIRE DEPARTMENT TWO-WAY TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION
 SERVICE
 PANELS AND CONTROLS WHERE REQUIRED BY ANOTHER SECTION
 OF THIS
 CODE
 (3) FIRE DETECTION AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATION
 PANELS
 (4) ELEVATOR FLOOR LOCATION AND OPERATION ANNUNCIATORS
 (5) ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME
 A17.1/CSA B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS AND ESCALATORS
 (6) ELEVATOR EMERGENCY POWER SELECTOR SWITCH(ES) WHERE
 PROVIDED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME A17.1/CSA B44
 (7) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATERFLOW ANNUNCIATORS
 (8) EMERGENCY GENERATOR STATUS INDICATORS
 (9) CONTROLS FOR ANY AUTOMATIC STAIRWAY DOOR UNLOCKING
 SYSTEM
 (10) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
 (11) TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
 ACCESS TO THE
 PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
 (12) STAIRWAY VIDEO MONITORING EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED BY
 11.8.8
  
 13. RADIO
 NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY
 RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.
 11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM
 RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
 COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL
 DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.
 NFPA 72, 24.5.2* TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS
 ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS.
 24.5.2.2 RADIO COVERAGE. RADIO COVERAGE SHALL BE
 PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE BUILDING AS A PERCENTAGE OF
 FLOOR AREA AS SPECIFIED IN 24.5.2.2.1 THROUGH
 24.5.2.2.3.
 24.5.2.2.1 CRITICAL AREAS. CRITICAL AREAS, SUCH AS THE
 EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER(S), THE FIRE PUMP ROOM(S),
 EXIT STAIRS, EXIT PASSAGEWAYS, ELEVATOR LOBBIES,
 STANDPIPE CABINETS, SPRINKLER SECTIONAL VALVE
 LOCATIONS, AND OTHER AREAS DEEMED CRITICAL BY THE
 AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH
 99 PERCENT FLOOR AREA RADIO COVERAGE.
 24.5.2.2.2 GENERAL BUILDING AREAS. GENERAL BUILDING
 AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH 90 PERCENT FLOOR AREA
 RADIO COVERAGE.
 24.5.2.3 SIGNAL STRENGTH.
 24.5.2.3.1 INBOUND. A MINIMUM INBOUND SIGNAL STRENGTH
 OF -95 DBM, OR OTHER SIGNAL STRENGTH AS REQUIRED BY THE
 AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL BE PROVIDED
 THROUGHOUT THE COVERAGE AREA.
 24.5.2.3.2 OUTBOUND. A MINIMUM OUTBOUND SIGNAL STRENGTH
 OF -95 DBM AT THE DONOR SITE, OR OTHER SIGNAL STRENGTH
 AS REQUIRED BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL
 BE PROVIDED FROM THE COVERAGE AREA.
  
 THE SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL
 STRENGTH OF -95 DBM FOR THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST
 PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE. TESTING SHALL BE BY AN
 ACCEPTABLE NATIONAL STANDARD DOCUMENTING PERCENTAGES
 NOTED ABOVE AND BY ACTUAL RADIO TESTING BY FIRE
 PERSONNEL. IF THE MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A
 BI-DIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH
 A MINIMUM 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP.
  
 14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 BUILDING.
 ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS,
 PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 15. THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA
 101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE PROTECTION
 EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING:
  
 THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED,
 INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204,
 STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY
 RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR
 RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY
 HAVING JURISDICTION.
  
 THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE
 INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE
 APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED
 MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE
 SYSTEM.
  
 ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL
 INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.9.
  
 16. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 17. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 07-06-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By aburnett Date 07-06-2021 Time 09:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aburnett Date 07-06-2021 Time 09:21 Sent To  
Notes
2021-07-06 09:27:27REVIEWED BY: ANDREW BURNETT
 501 S. DIXIE HOTEL #Z19100014
 7/6/21
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. AS STATED IN
 ITEM #5 ARBORIST SHALL PROVIDE A REPORT ON THE LOCATION
 POSIBILITIES FOR OAK TREES.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 03-22-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 03-22-2021 Time 12:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 03-22-2021 Time 12:13 Sent To  
Notes
2021-03-22 12:14:39FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 501 S DIXIE HOTEL Z19100014
 MARCH 22, 2021
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. THE STREETSCAPE CAN BE IMPROVED TO
 ACCOMPLISH THE INTENT OF THE CODE SECTION 94-113. THE
 DATE PALMS MAY BE USED, BUT NOT AS COUNTING TOWARD THE
 TREE REQUIREMENT AT THE MAXIMUM 30 FOOT SPACING. ADD
 CANOPY TREES AS REQUIRED.
 TREES ALONG GARDENIA MUST BE SPACED AT A MAXIMUM OF 30
 FEET TO PROVIDE CANOPY COVERAGE TO THE SIDEWALK. CAN BE
 PLACED WITHIN SIGHT TRIANGLE AS THEY WILL HAVE 8 FOOT
 CLEARANCE FROM THE GROUND TO FIRST BRANCHES. TREE
 CANOPY MUST BE PROVIDED AT ENTRANCE/EXIT.
  
 2. SATISFIED. CHANGE HIGHRISE OAK TO A CANOPY TREE TO
 PROVIDE SHADE FOR THE PLAZA AREA.
  
 3. SATISFIED. FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE DESIGN POINTS
 CANNOT BE COUNTED FOR 51% OR MORE IN THE SAME CATEGORY.
 REVISE.
 COLUMN FOR POINTS DOES NOT LINE UP WITH CATEGORY.
 REVISE.
  
 4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES
 NATIVE TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE
 OR RELOCATED. SUBMIT THE REASON EXISTING LIVE OAK TREES
 #38, 39 AND 40 CANNOT BE RELOCATED OR USED IN THE
 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE.
 PROVIDE EVALUATION IN WRITING FROM A TREE RELOCATION
 CERTIFIED ARBORIST TO DOCUMENT REASONS THE TREES CANNOT
 BE RELOCATED.
 SUPPLY A RESPONSE ON THESE TREES. STAFF WILL WORK WITH
 THE APPLICANT TO DETERMINE LOCATIONS FOR LIKELY
 TRANSPLANTS.
 TREES THAT ARE LIKELY TO BE REMOVED OR HAVE ALREADY
 BEEN REMOVED NEED TO HAVE THE MITIGATION SHOWN.
 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHOULD CONTACT REVIEWER TO CLARIFY.
  
 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. QGD-10 REQUIRES 25 PERCENT
 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE FOR LOT SIZE UNDER 50,000 SQ FT.
 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS MUST BE IDENTIFIED AND BROKEN
 DOWN TO SHOW THE REQUIRED VEGETATED AREA AND ANY TREE
 CANOPY REQUIREMENT FOR EACH AREA AS THE ALLOWED OPEN
 SPACE TYPE. TREE CANOPY VALUES CAN BE FOUND IN SECTION
 94-109 TABLE IV-8.
 TERRACE IS A PERMITTED PRIVATE OPEN SPACE TYPE PER
 TABLE IV-6.
 SEPARATE THE 5TH FLOOR PARKING STRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS
 CALCULATIONS FROM THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS,
 AS THEY ARE SEPARATE CODE REQUIREMENTS.
 PER SECTION 94-109, THE UPPER LEVEL PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
 MEETS THE PURPOSE AND DEFINITION OF ROOFTOP GARDEN.
 STAFF SUGGESTS ADDING THE MINIMAL AMOUNT OF TREE CANOPY
 REQUIRED TO IMPROVE THE SPACE.
  
 6. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES ON
 LANDSCAPE PLAN, ALSO LOCATIONS OF FDC, VALVES AND
 BACKFLOW PREVENTERS AND FPL TRANSFORMERS. INDICATE HOW
 THE OVERHEAD LINES IN THE ADJACENT ALLEY WILL BE
 ACCOMMODATED.
  
 7. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS
 REQUIRED TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES.
  
 8. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF REQUIRED STRUCTURAL
 SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE ADJACENT TO TREES. PROVIDE A
 TYPICAL FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE STRUCTURAL SOIL.
 ADJUST THE TYPICAL DETAIL TO LOCAL CONDITIONS. REMOVE
 THE DRAIN LINE AND ONLY SHOW 36 INCH DEPTH UNDER THE
 ADJACENT HARDSCAPE, NOT UNDER THE TREE ROOT BALL. ANY
 AREAS THAT ARE PLANTING AREAS NEED TO SHOW PLANTING
 SOIL MIX. THE ROOT BALL FOR 20 FT TREES WILL BE AT
 LEAST 36 INCHES IN DEPTH.
  
 9. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
 PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
 MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 5/5/20:
 10. SATISFIED. REVISE THE EXISTING TREE DISPOSITION
 LIST TO SHOW THE ACTUAL CANOPY DIAMETER FOR TREES #38,
 39, 40 AND 62 INSTEAD OF SHOWING >20 DIA. THEN SHOW
 CALCULATED MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THAT TREE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 3/18/21:
 11. MEDJOOL DATE PALMS MUST HAVE AT LEAST 14 FOOT CLEAR
 TRUNK SO THAT FRONDS ARE ABOVE 13.5 FEET CLEARANCE FOR
 TRAFFIC LANE.
  
 12. ROOT BARRIERS AT THE PROPOSED PLACEMENT WOULD BLOCK
 TREE ROOT DEVELOPMENT IN THE PLANTING STRIPS. LINE
 LOCATIONS WILL NEED TO BE WORKED OUT WITH UTILITIES TO
 AVOID THIS.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 05-05-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 05-05-2020 Time 16:00 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 05-05-2020 Time 16:00 Sent To  
Notes
2020-05-05 16:00:52FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 501 S DIXIE HOTEL Z19100014
 MAY 5, 2020
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE STREETSCAPE CAN BE IMPROVED
 TO ACCOMPLISH THE INTENT OF THE CODE SECTION 94-113.
 THE DATE PALMS MAY BE USED, BUT NOT AS COUNTING TOWARD
 THE TREE REQUIREMENT AT THE MAXIMUM 30 FOOT SPACING.
 ADD CANOPY TREES AS REQUIRED.
 TREES ALONG GARDENIA MUST BE SPACED AT A MAXIMUM OF 30
 FEET TO PROVIDE CANOPY COVERAGE TO THE SIDEWALK. CAN BE
 PLACED WITHIN SIGHT TRIANGLE AS THEY WILL HAVE 8 FOOT
 CLEARANCE FROM THE GROUND TO FIRST BRANCHES. TREE
 CANOPY MUST BE PROVIDED AT ENTRANCE/EXIT.
  
 2. SATISFIED. CHANGE HIGHRISE OAK TO A CANOPY TREE TO
 PROVIDE SHADE FOR THE PLAZA AREA.
  
 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE
 DESIGN POINTS CANNOT BE COUNTED FOR 51% OR MORE IN THE
 SAME CATEGORY. REVISE.
 COLUMN FOR POINTS DOES NOT LINE UP WITH CATEGORY.
 REVISE.
  
 4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES
 NATIVE TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE
 OR RELOCATED. SUBMIT THE REASON EXISTING LIVE OAK TREES
 #38, 39 AND 40 CANNOT BE RELOCATED OR USED IN THE
 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE.
 PROVIDE EVALUATION IN WRITING FROM A TREE RELOCATION
 CERTIFIED ARBORIST TO DOCUMENT REASONS THE TREES CANNOT
 BE RELOCATED, EVEN OFF SITE.
  
 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. QGD-10 REQUIRES 25 PERCENT
 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE FOR LOT SIZE UNDER 50,000 SQ FT.
 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS MUST BE IDENTIFIED AND BROKEN
 DOWN TO SHOW THE REQUIRED VEGETATED AREA AND ANY TREE
 CANOPY REQUIREMENT FOR EACH AREA AS THE ALLOWED OPEN
 SPACE TYPE. TREE CANOPY VALUES CAN BE FOUND IN SECTION
 94-109 TABLE IV-8.
 TERRACE IS A PERMITTED PRIVATE OPEN SPACE TYPE PER
 TABLE IV-6.
 SEPARATE THE 5TH FLOOR PARKING STRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS
 CALCULATIONS FROM THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS,
 AS THEY ARE SEPARATE CODE REQUIREMENTS.
  
 6. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES ON
 LANDSCAPE PLAN, ALSO LOCATIONS OF FDC, VALVES AND
 BACKFLOW PREVENTERS AND FPL TRANSFORMERS. INDICATE HOW
 THE OVERHEAD LINES IN THE ADJACENT ALLEY WILL BE
 ACCOMMODATED.
  
 7. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS
 REQUIRED TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES.
  
 8. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF REQUIRED
 STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE ADJACENT TO TREES.
 PROVIDE A TYPICAL FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE
 STRUCTURAL SOIL.
 ADJUST THE TYPICAL DETAIL TO LOCAL CONDITIONS. REMOVE
 THE DRAIN LINE AND ONLY SHOW 36 INCH DEPTH UNDER THE
 ADJACENT HARDSCAPE, NOT UNDER THE TREE ROOT BALL. ANY
 AREAS THAT ARE PLANTING AREAS NEED TO SHOW PLANTING
 SOIL MIX. THE ROOT BALL FOR 20 FT TREES WILL BE AT
 LEAST 36 INCHES IN DEPTH.
  
 9. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
 PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
 MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 5/5/20:
 10. REVISE THE EXISTING TREE DISPOSITION LIST TO SHOW
 THE ACTUAL CANOPY DIAMETER FOR TREES #38, 39, 40 AND 62
 INSTEAD OF SHOWING >20 DIA. THEN SHOW CALCULATED
 MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THAT TREE.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-12-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 11-12-2019 Time 10:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 11-12-2019 Time 10:40 Sent To  
Notes
2019-11-12 10:41:20FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 501 S DIXIE HOTEL Z19100014
 NOVEMBER 8, 2019
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. THE STREETSCAPE CAN BE IMPROVED TO ACCOMPLISH THE
 INTENT OF THE CODE SECTION 94-113. THE DATE PALMS MAY
 BE USED, BUT NOT AS COUNTING TOWARD THE TREE
 REQUIREMENT AT THE MAXIMUM 30 FOOT SPACING. ADD CANOPY
 TREES AS REQUIRED.
  
 2. CHANGE HIGHRISE OAK TO A CANOPY TREE TO PROVIDE
 SHADE FOR THE PLAZA AREA.
  
 3. FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE DESIGN POINTS CANNOT BE
 COUNTED FOR 51% OR MORE IN THE SAME CATEGORY. REVISE.
  
 4. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES IN GOOD
 CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. SUBMIT
 THE REASON EXISTING LIVE OAK TREES #38, 39 AND 40
 CANNOT BE RELOCATED OR USED IN THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE.
  
 5. QGD-10 REQUIRES 25 PERCENT PRIVATE OPEN SPACE FOR
 LOT SIZE UNDER 50,000 SQ FT. PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS
 MUST BE IDENTIFIED AND BROKEN DOWN TO SHOW THE REQUIRED
 VEGETATED AREA AND ANY TREE CANOPY REQUIREMENT FOR EACH
 AREA AS THE ALLOWED OPEN SPACE TYPE. TREE CANOPY VALUES
 CAN BE FOUND IN SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-8.
  
 6. SHOW LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES ON LANDSCAPE PLAN,
 ALSO LOCATIONS OF FDC, VALVES AND BACKFLOW PREVENTERS
 AND FPL TRANSFORMERS. INDICATE HOW THE OVERHEAD LINES
 IN THE ADJACENT ALLEY WILL BE ACCOMMODATED.
  
 7. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS REQUIRED TO
 PROTECT UTILITY LINES.
  
 8. SHOW LOCATIONS OF REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER
 HARDSCAPE ADJACENT TO TREES. PROVIDE A TYPICAL FOR THE
 INSTALLATION OF THE STRUCTURAL SOIL.
  
 9. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT
 SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL
 ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT
 SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF
 SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA
 WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA
 LANDSCAPES.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 3 Status F Date 03-04-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 03-04-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 03-04-2021 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-03-04 15:21:35PLEASE PROVIDE:
 1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID
 WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE AND TYPE OF
 THE CONTAINER THAT WILL BE UTILIZED THAT WILL BE
 UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE.
 2-AUTOTURN (DYNAMIC ENVELOPE AND THE TIRES PATH) FOR
 THE SANITATION SERVICE, FRONT LOADER TRUCK WITH THE
 FOLLOWING SPECS:
 - TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT
 - TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT
 - TURNING RADIUS:
 - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT
 - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT
 - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT
  
  
  
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 MATT HEJAZI
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 2 Status F Date 05-08-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 05-08-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 05-08-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-05-08 08:42:41PLEASE PROVIDE LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO
 REFLECT THE SOLID WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE
 SIZE AND TYPE OF THE CONTAINER THAT WILL BE UTILIZED
 THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE.
  
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 MATT HEJAZI
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-07-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 11-07-2019 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 11-07-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-11-07 08:57:07PLEASE PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING AUTO-TURN FOR SANITATION
 SERVICE.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 3 Status F Date 03-26-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 03-26-2021 Time 10:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 03-26-2021 Time 11:37 Sent To  
Notes
2021-03-26 11:35:30THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 3/2/2021 SUBMITTAL REVIEW SET.
  
 1. THERE APPEAR TO BE A MIXTURE OF NAVD1988 AND
 NGVD1929 ELEVATIONS ON THE PLANS. ALL ELEVATION
 INFORMATION (FFE, SPOT GRADES, INVERT/RIM ELEVATIONS,
 ETC.) SHOULD REFERENCE THE SAME VERTICAL DATUM.
  
 2. LIST THE VERTICAL DATUM REFERENCE ON ALL SHEETS
 (INCLUDING DETAIL SHEETS) WITH ELEVATION INFORMATION
 AND PROVIDE THE CONVERSION TO NGVD1929.
  
 3. CAN MH#3 BE MOVED FURTHER EAST? IT'S NOT CLEAR WHERE
 THE CORNER OF THE BUILDING IS AT THE EAST SIDE OF THE
 EAST DRIVEWAY.
  
 4. REMOVE THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH OUT OF THE RIGHT OF
 WAY.
  
 5. MOVE THE DRAINAGE CONTROL STRUCTURE (WEIR) OUT OF
 THE RIGHT OF WAY.
  
 6. ALL STORM PIPE WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY TO BE RCP,
 MINIMUM 15" IN DIAMETER.
  
 7. ON SECTION B-B ON PAGE C-9, IT APPEARS THERE IS A
 GRADE BREAK OF THE ROADWAY SURFACE NEAR THE VALLEY
 GUTTER. THE VALLEY GUTTER SHOULD BE LABELED AS 2'
 INSTEAD OF 1.50'.
  
 8. SHOW TYPE 'F' C&G FOR SECTION C-C INSTEAD OF
 EXISTING TYPE 'D'.
  
 9. SECTION D-D FOR THE 15.6' WIDE SIDEWALK ON S. DIXIE
 HWY SHOWS MAX. 2% CROSS SLOPE OR 3.75 INCHES OF
 VERTICAL FALL FROM BUILDING FACE TO BACK OF CURB. THE
 FFE OF 15.0 FT NAVD IS MORE THAN 2 FEET HIGHER THAN THE
 BACK OF CURB. HOW WILL THE SIDEWALK BE GRADED,
 PARTICULARLY AT THE DOORWAY ENTRANCE TO THE RETAIL AREA
 AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE BUILDING? THE VERTICAL
 DIFFERENCE MAY NEED TO BE MADE UP INSIDE THE BUILDING
 INSTEAD OF RAISING THE SIDEWALK GRADES. IS THERE A
 WHEEL CHAIR RAMP FROM THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK TO THE
 LOUNGE?
  
 10. THERE ARE STEPS SHOWN AT THE SOUTH END OF THE
 BUILDING. WILL THE SIDEWALK MEET ADA SLOPE CRITERIA
 ADJACENT TO THE STEPS?
  
 11. IT APPEARS SURFACE RUNOFF ON GARDENIA STREET WILL
 FLOW WEST FROM THE EAST DRIVEWAY TO PROPOSED CB C-4.
 EXTEND THE TYPE 'F' C&G TO THE CATCH BASIN.
  
 12. THE VALVE BOX FOR THE FIRE HYDRANT SHALL NOT FALL
 WITHIN THE GUTTER.
  
 TRACY WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120(O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
  
  
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status F Date 05-04-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 05-04-2020 Time 14:12 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 05-04-2020 Time 14:35 Sent To  
Notes
2020-05-04 14:35:48THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 4/20/2020 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE.
  
 1. MOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE NO. 3 OUT OF THE DRIVEWAY
 FOR SAFETY AND TO AVOID BLOCKAGE OF THE DRIVEWAY WHEN
 THE MANHOLE IS OPENED.
  
 2. COORDINATE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE DEMOLITION PLAN,
 PGD PLAN AND STRIPING PLAN. FOR EXAMPLE, THE DEMO.
 PLANS CALLS OUT REMOVAL OF CURBING AND STRIPING TO NEAR
 QUADRILLE BLVD. BUT THERE IS STRIPING SHOWN WEST OF THE
 WEST PROPERTY LINE AND THE PGD PLAN CALLS OUT EXISTING
 CURBING ALONG THE EXISTING PARKING SPACES. COORDINATE
 THE EXTENT OF CURB REMOVAL WITH THE TRANSPORTATION
 ENGINEER.
  
 3. PROVIDE THREE CROSS SECTIONS ALONG GARDENIA (EAST OF
 DRIVEWAY NEAR FDC), AT ONE OF THE DRIVEWAYS AND WEST OF
 THE DRIVEWAY AT THE STAIRWELL), ONE CROSS SECTION ON S.
 DIXIE HWY AND ONE SECTION ON THE ALLEY. FOR THE ROADWAY
 SECTIONS SHOW THE RIGHT OF WAY CENTERLINE, PROPERTY
 LINE, PAVEMENT WIDTH (OPPOSITE SIDE EDGE OF PAVEMENT OR
 FACE OF CURB TO NEARSIDE EDGE OF PAVEMENT) AND MINIMUM
 SETBACKS FROM BACK OF CURB TO FACE OF BUILDING,
 SIDEWALK WIDTH, PARKING WIDTH, CURB WIDTH, ETC., AND
 APPROXIMATE SLOPES.FOR THE ALLEY CROSS SECTION , SHOW
 BUIDLING FACES, RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES, PAVEMENT SLOPE
 DIRECTIONS (INVERTED/NORMAL CROWN OR SHED SECTION) AND
 HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS BETWEEN FACE OF BUILDING AND
 RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 4. CAN FH BE INSTALLED CLOSER TO S. DIXIE HWY?
  
 5. STOP SIGN IS SHOWN ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THE STOP BAR.
 WILL "DO NOT ENTER" SIGNS OR DIRECTIONAL ARROWS ON THE
 PAVEMENT BE NEEDED?
  
 THE HGL ANALYSIS OF OFFSITE THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM CAN BE
 PROVIDED WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 TRACY WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-13-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 11-13-2019 Time 09:41 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 11-13-2019 Time 09:42 Sent To  
Notes
2019-11-13 09:42:07THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
  
 HTTPS://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FO
 RMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. REMOVE THE EXISTING DRAINAGE PIPE FROM THE PARKING
 LOT TO THE INLET ON S. DIXIE HWY.
  
 2. EXPLAIN WHAT AND 'IDB' IS (SEE CATCH BASIN NO. 2)
  
 3. PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
 RETENTION VAULT STORAGE.
  
 4. IDENTIFY THE CONTROL STRUCTURE FOR THE EXFILTRATION
 TRENCH.
  
 5. CALCULATION THE CHANGE IN HGL FOR THE INLET ON
 GARDENIA ST.
  
 6. ARE THE TRENCH DRAINS ACROSS THE DRIVEWAYS
 NECESSARY? THEY APPEAR TO BE AT HIGH POINTS OF THE
 DRIVEWAYS.
  
 7. EXTEND THE TYPE 'F' CURB AND GUTTER TO THE WEST
 PROPERTY CORNER.
  
 8. LABEL THE VERTICAL DATUM ON ALL SHEETS WITH
 ELEVATION DATA AND PROVIDE THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO
 NGVD1929.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
 THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS
 CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE
 ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED
 WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP PRIOR TO STARTING
 CONSTRUCTION.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 06-30-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 06-30-2021 Time 07:51 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-06-30 07:50:57CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
  
 1. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT PRIOR TO C.O.
 2. SURVEY IS STILL NOT SIGNED.
  
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 03-10-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 03-10-2021 Time 12:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-03-10 12:50:591. NEED SIGNED AND SEALED COPY OF UPDATED SURVEY.
 2. NEED MORE DETAILS SHOWING CANOPY BETWEEN HOTELS. NOT
 CONSISTENTLY SHOWN ON PLANS.SANITATION AND PUBLIC
 UTILITIES NEED TO APPROVE HEIGHT.
 3. AS PREVIOUSLY STATED, SEPARATE CANOPY AGREEMENT WILL
 BE REQUIRED.
 4. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR GARDENIA AND DIXIE WILL BE
 REQUIRED.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 05-01-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 05-01-2020 Time 07:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-05-01 07:44:401. SURVEY SHOULD ONLY INCLUDE PARCEL 1.
 2. UNITY OF TITLE WILL BE REQUIRED.
 3. REMOVE POSSIBLE FUTURE CONNECTION BETWEEN HOTELS AS
 NOT INCLUDED IN THE SUBMITTAL. A SEPARATE AGREEMENT
 WILL BE REQUIRED.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-13-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 11-13-2019 Time 08:24 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-11-13 09:12:051. ARE ANY IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED TO THE EXISTING HOTEL
 SITE?
 2. SURVEY NEEDS TO BE UPDATED.
 3. METERS AND VAULT LOCATION WILL NEED APPROVAL FROM
 MARK HURLEY, CUSTOMER SERVICE.
 4. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR GARDENIA
 AND DIXIE.
 5. STORMWATER WILL REVIEW PROPOSED DRAINAGE IN
 GARDENIA.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 6 Status F Date 07-20-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 07-20-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-07-20 15:22:53TRAFFIC STUDY COMMENTS:
 1. SATISFIED. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS A 132-UNITS HOTEL
 PLUS PENTHOUSE AND 3,207 SF RETAIL, BUT THE TRIP
 GENERATION ASSUMES 128-UNITS HOTEL WITH ONE RESIDENTIAL
 CONDO DWELLING UNIT. PROVIDE REVISED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
 ONCE AVAILABLE.
 2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE TRIP DISTRIBUTION WITHIN THE
 RADIUS OF INFLUENCE PER COUNTY TPS. EVEN IF THE
 DEVELOPMENT IS WITHIN A TCEA, THE CITY CAN REQUEST MORE
 IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS.
 3. SATISFIED. PERFORM TEST 1 AND 2 PER COUNTY TPS. EVEN
 IF THE DEVELOPMENT IS WITHIN A TCEA, THE CITY CAN
 REQUEST MORE IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS. THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT FAILS TEST 1 PART II, AS IT SIGNIFICANTLY
 IMPACTS QUADRILLE BLVD AND GARDENIA. FURTHER MITIGATION
 AND TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT INITIATIVES SHALL
 BE DISCUSSED WITH PLANNING AND ENGINEERING.
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AM/PM PEAK HOUR AND DAILY
 DRIVEWAY VOLUMES. EVEN IF THE DEVELOPMENT IS WITHIN A
 TCEA, THE CITY CAN REQUEST MORE IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS
 5. SATISFIED. EVEN IF THE DEVELOPMENT IS WITHIN A TCEA,
 THE CITY CAN REQUEST MORE IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS. PROVIDE
 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR THE FOLLOWING:
 A. QUADRILLE AND GARDENIA
 B. S DIXIE AND GARDENIA
 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE QUEUING ANALYSIS FOR
 THE VALET OPERATIONS. EVEN IF THE DEVELOPMENT IS WITHIN
 A TCEA, THE CITY CAN REQUEST MORE IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS.
 PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS BASED ON ASSUMED STAFFING
 PERSONNEL.
 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE CLARIFY THE VALET OPERATIONS AND
 THE CIRCULATION ROUTES. ALL VALET CIRCULATION ROUTES
 MUST BE CONTAINED ON-SITE AND SHOULD NOT USE CITY
 STREETS (I.E. CANNOT CIRCULATE AROUND CITY BLOCKS FOR
 PICK-UP AND/OR DELIVERY OPERATIONS). EVEN IF THE
 DEVELOPMENT IS WITHIN A TCEA, THE CITY CAN REQUEST MORE
 IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS. THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW THE
 REQUESTED INFORMATION. BASED ON THE TRAFFIC STUDY, IT
 SEEMS THAT VALET OPERATIONS ARE CONDUCTED AGAINST CITY
 CODE, AS VEHICLES BELONGING TO RESIDENCE INN PATRONS
 ARE DRIVEN TO/FROM THE AC MARRIOTT HOTEL PARKING GARAGE
 USING CITY STREETS. SUCH OPERATIONS WOULD NOT BE
 ALLOWED.
 8. SATISFIED. CLARIFY PARKING ARRANGEMENTS WITH
 EXISTING MARRIOTT HOTEL DURING CONSTRUCTION PHASE(S)
 AND AT BUILD-OUT. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE DETAILS
 PERTAINING THE ALTERNATIVE ARRANGEMENTS.
 9. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE
 AVAILABLE.
  
 SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
 10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PAYMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR
 REMOVAL OF ON-STREET PARKING SPACES ALONG GARDENIA.
 PLEASE COORDINATE WITH PARKING ADMINISTRATION FOR THE
 PROCESS AND PROVIDE OUTCOME OF SUCH PROCEEDING.
 11. SATISFIED. GARAGE DRIVING AISLE SHOULD HAVE A
 MINIMUM OF 24 FEET WIDTH WHEREVER SELF-PARKING VEHICLES
 TRAVERSE
 12. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CIRCULATION ROUTES AND SHOW
 AUTOTURN PATHS FOR ALL DELIVERY, SERVICE VEHICLES AND
 GARBAGE TRUCKS. ANALYSIS SHOWS GARBAGE TRUCK
 ENCROACHMENT WITH A BUILDING AT THE ALLEYWAY AND
 QUADRILLE INTERSECTION. MOREOVER, EVEN THOUGH THE TRUCK
 TAKES A WIDE TURN AT DIXIE, IT STILL ENCROACHES PRIVATE
 ROW. DUE TO SUCH CONDITIONS, SANITATION OPERATION MAY
 NOT BE FEASIBLE THROUGH THE ALLEYWAY.
  
 CONDITIONS:
 1. NO SELF-PARKING SHALL BE ALLOWED INSIDE THE GARAGE
 WHEREVER PARKING AISLE IS LESS THAN 24? WIDE.
 2. PROVIDE EASEMENT FOR THE PORTION OF SIDEWALK OUTSIDE
 PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 3. PROVIDE MICROMOBILITY FACILITIES ON-SITE.
 SPECIFICALLY: IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY
 ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20
 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS
 (CIRCUIT BOX AND ELECTRIC CONDUIT). CLEARLY DEPICT THE
 DESIGNATED SPACE ON THE SITE PLAN.
 4. PROPOSE TDM MEASURES TO BE IMPLEMENTED AS PART OF
 THE DEVELOPMENT, SUCH AS:
 A. PARKING CASH-OUT PROGRAM FOR EMPLOYEES
 B. TRANSIT PASS SUBSIDY FOR EMPLOYEES
 C. SECURE BIKE PARKING FOR EMPLOYEES
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 5 Status F Date 06-30-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 06-30-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-06-30 22:33:48TRAFFIC STUDY COMMENTS:
 1. SATISFIED. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS A 132-UNITS HOTEL
 PLUS PENTHOUSE AND 3,207 SF RETAIL, BUT THE TRIP
 GENERATION ASSUMES 128-UNITS HOTEL WITH ONE RESIDENTIAL
 CONDO DWELLING UNIT. PROVIDE REVISED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
 ONCE AVAILABLE.
 2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE TRIP DISTRIBUTION WITHIN THE
 RADIUS OF INFLUENCE PER COUNTY TPS. EVEN IF THE
 DEVELOPMENT IS WITHIN A TCEA, THE CITY CAN REQUEST MORE
 IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS.
 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PERFORM TEST 1 AND 2 PER COUNTY
 TPS. EVEN IF THE DEVELOPMENT IS WITHIN A TCEA, THE CITY
 CAN REQUEST MORE IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS. THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT FAILS TEST 1 PART II, AS IT SIGNIFICANTLY
 IMPACTS QUADRILLE BLVD AND GARDENIA. FURTHER MITIGATION
 AND TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT INITIATIVES SHALL
 BE DISCUSSED WITH PLANNING AND ENGINEERING.
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AM/PM PEAK HOUR AND DAILY
 DRIVEWAY VOLUMES. EVEN IF THE DEVELOPMENT IS WITHIN A
 TCEA, THE CITY CAN REQUEST MORE IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS
 5. SATISFIED. EVEN IF THE DEVELOPMENT IS WITHIN A TCEA,
 THE CITY CAN REQUEST MORE IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS. PROVIDE
 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR THE FOLLOWING:
 A. QUADRILLE AND GARDENIA
 B. S DIXIE AND GARDENIA
 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE QUEUING ANALYSIS FOR
 THE VALET OPERATIONS. EVEN IF THE DEVELOPMENT IS WITHIN
 A TCEA, THE CITY CAN REQUEST MORE IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS.
 PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS BASED ON ASSUMED STAFFING
 PERSONNEL.
 7. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE CLARIFY THE VALET OPERATIONS
 AND THE CIRCULATION ROUTES. ALL VALET CIRCULATION
 ROUTES MUST BE CONTAINED ON-SITE AND SHOULD NOT USE
 CITY STREETS (I.E. CANNOT CIRCULATE AROUND CITY BLOCKS
 FOR PICK-UP AND/OR DELIVERY OPERATIONS). EVEN IF THE
 DEVELOPMENT IS WITHIN A TCEA, THE CITY CAN REQUEST MORE
 IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS. THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW THE
 REQUESTED INFORMATION. BASED ON THE TRAFFIC STUDY, IT
 SEEMS THAT VALET OPERATIONS ARE CONDUCTED AGAINST CITY
 CODE, AS VEHICLES BELONGING TO RESIDENCE INN PATRONS
 ARE DRIVEN TO/FROM THE AC MARRIOTT HOTEL PARKING GARAGE
 USING CITY STREETS. SUCH OPERATIONS WOULD NOT BE
 ALLOWED.
 8. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. CLARIFY PARKING ARRANGEMENTS
 WITH EXISTING MARRIOTT HOTEL DURING CONSTRUCTION
 PHASE(S) AND AT BUILD-OUT. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE DETAILS
 PERTAINING THE ALTERNATIVE ARRANGEMENTS.
 9. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE
 AVAILABLE.
 SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
 10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PAYMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR
 REMOVAL OF ON-STREET PARKING SPACES ALONG GARDENIA.
 PLEASE COORDINATE WITH PARKING ADMINISTRATION FOR THE
 PROCESS AND PROVIDE OUTCOME OF SUCH PROCEEDING.
 11. SATISFIED. GARAGE DRIVING AISLE SHOULD HAVE A
 MINIMUM OF 24 FEET WIDTH WHEREVER SELF-PARKING VEHICLES
 TRAVERSE
 12. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE CIRCULATION ROUTES AND
 SHOW AUTOTURN PATHS FOR ALL DELIVERY, SERVICE VEHICLES
 AND GARBAGE TRUCKS. ANALYSIS SHOWS GARBAGE TRUCK
 ENCROACHMENT WITH A BUILDING AT THE ALLEYWAY AND
 QUADRILLE INTERSECTION. MOREOVER, EVEN THOUGH THE TRUCK
 TAKES A WIDE TURN AT DIXIE, IT STILL ENCROACHES PRIVATE
 ROW. DUE TO SUCH CONDITIONS, SANITATION OPERATION MAY
 NOT BE FEASIBLE THROUGH THE ALLEYWAY.
  
 CONDITIONS:
 1. NO SELF-PARKING SHALL BE ALLOWED INSIDE THE GARAGE
 WHEREVER PARKING AISLE IS LESS THAN 24 FEET WIDE.
 2. PROVIDE EASEMENT FOR THE PORTION OF SIDEWALK OUTSIDE
 PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 3. PROVIDE MICROMOBILITY FACILITIES ON-SITE.
 SPECIFICALLY: IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY
 ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20
 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS
 (CIRCUIT BOX AND ELECTRIC CONDUIT). CLEARLY DEPICT THE
 DESIGNATED SPACE ON THE SITE PLAN.
 4. PROVIDE TDM MEASURES TO BE IMPLEMENTED AS PART OF
 THE DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO:
 A. UNBUNDLED PARKING/PARKING CASH-OUT PROGRAM FOR
 EMPLOYEES
 B. TRANSIT PASS SUBSIDY FOR EMPLOYEES
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 03-29-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 03-29-2021 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2021-03-29 14:24:48TRAFFIC STUDY COMMENTS:
 1. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS A 132-UNITS HOTEL PLUS PENTHOUSE
 AND 3,207 SF RETAIL, BUT THE TRIP GENERATION ASSUMES
 128-UNITS HOTEL WITH ONE RESIDENTIAL CONDO DWELLING
 UNIT. PROVIDE REVISED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ONCE AVAILABLE.
 2. PROVIDE TRIP DISTRIBUTION WITHIN THE RADIUS OF
 INFLUENCE PER COUNTY TPS. EVEN IF THE DEVELOPMENT IS
 WITHIN A TCEA, THE CITY CAN REQUEST MORE IN-DEPTH
 ANALYSIS.
 3. PERFORM TEST 1 AND 2 PER COUNTY TPS. EVEN IF THE
 DEVELOPMENT IS WITHIN A TCEA, THE CITY CAN REQUEST MORE
 IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS.
 4. PROVIDE AM/PM PEAK HOUR AND DAILY DRIVEWAY VOLUMES.
 EVEN IF THE DEVELOPMENT IS WITHIN A TCEA, THE CITY CAN
 REQUEST MORE IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS
 5. EVEN IF THE DEVELOPMENT IS WITHIN A TCEA, THE CITY
 CAN REQUEST MORE IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS. PROVIDE
 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR THE FOLLOWING:
 5A. QUADRILLE AND GARDENIA
 5B. S DIXIE AND GARDENIA
 6. PROVIDE QUEUING ANALYSIS FOR THE VALET OPERATIONS.
 EVEN IF THE DEVELOPMENT IS WITHIN A TCEA, THE CITY CAN
 REQUEST MORE IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS
 7. PLEASE CLARIFY THE VALET OPERATIONS AND THE
 CIRCULATION ROUTES. ALL VALET CIRCULATION ROUTES MUST
 BE CONTAINED ON-SITE AND SHOULD NOT USE CITY STREETS
 (I.E. CANNOT CIRCULATE AROUND CITY BLOCKS FOR PICK-UP
 AND/OR DELIVERY OPERATIONS). EVEN IF THE DEVELOPMENT IS
 WITHIN A TCEA, THE CITY CAN REQUEST MORE IN-DEPTH
 ANALYSIS
 8. CLARIFY PARKING ARRANGEMENTS WITH EXISTING MARRIOTT
 HOTEL DURING CONSTRUCTION PHASE(S) AND AT BUILD-OUT.
 9. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE AVAILABLE.
  
 SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
 10. PAYMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR REMOVAL OF ON-STREET
 PARKING SPACES ALONG GARDENIA. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH
 PARKING ADMINISTRATION FOR THE PROCESS AND PROVIDE
 OUTCOME OF SUCH PROCEEDING.
 11. GARAGE DRIVING AISLE SHOULD HAVE A MINIMUM OF 24
 FEET WIDTH WHEREVER SELF-PARKING VEHICLES TRAVERSE
 12. PROVIDE CIRCULATION ROUTES AND SHOW AUTOTURN PATHS
 FOR ALL DELIVERY, SERVICE VEHICLES AND GARBAGE TRUCKS.
  
 CONDITIONS:
 1. NO SELF-PARKING SHALL BE ALLOWED INSIDE THE GARAGE
 WHEREVER PARKING AISLE IS LESS THAN 24 FEET WIDE.
 2. PROVIDE EASEMENT FOR THE PORTION OF SIDEWALK OUTSIDE
 PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 3. PROVIDE MICROMOBILITY FACILITIES ON-SITE
 4. PROVIDE TDM MEASURES TO BE IMPLEMENTED AS PART OF
 THE DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO:
 4A. UNBUNDLED PARKING/PARKING CASH-OUT PROGRAM FOR
 EMPLOYEES
 4B. TRANSIT PASS SUBSIDY FOR EMPLOYEES
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 05-05-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-05-05 14:19:24TRAFFIC STUDY COMMENTS:
 1. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS A 132-UNITS HOTEL PLUS PENTHOUSE
 AND 3,207 SF RETAIL, BUT THE TRIP GENERATION ASSUMES
 128-UNITS HOTEL WITH ONE RESIDENTIAL CONDO DWELLING
 UNIT. PLEASE VERIFY AND REVISE.
 2. PROVIDE TRIP DISTRIBUTION WITHIN THE RADIUS OF
 INFLUENCE PER COUNTY TPS.
 3. PERFORM TEST 1 AND 2 PER COUNTY TPS.
 4. PROVIDE AM/PM PEAK HOUR AND DAILY DRIVEWAY VOLUMES.
 5. PROVIDE INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR THE FOLLOWING:
 A. QUADRILLE AND GARDENIA
 B. S DIXIE AND GARDENIA
 6. PROVIDE QUEUING ANALYSIS FOR THE VALET OPERATIONS.
 7. PLEASE CLARIFY THE VALET OPERATIONS AND THE
 CIRCULATION ROUTES. ALL VALET CIRCULATION ROUTES MUST
 BE CONTAINED ON-SITE AND SHOULD NOT USE CITY STREETS
 (I.E. CANNOT CIRCULATE AROUND CITY BLOCKS FOR PICK-UP
 AND/OR DELIVERY OPERATIONS).
 8. CLARIFY PARKING ARRANGEMENTS WITH EXISTING MARRIOTT
 HOTEL DURING CONSTRUCTION PHASE(S) AND AT BUILD-OUT.
 9. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER.
  
  
 SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
 10. INDICATE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED AND MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE
 NUMBER OF VEHICULAR PARKING SPACES BY CITY CODE ON THE
 SITE DATA TABLE.
 11. INDICATE THE NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES
 PROVIDED AND INCLUDE IT IN THE SITE DATA TABLE.
 12. INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE REQUIRED SHOWER
 FACILITY FOR EMPLOYEES ON THE SITE PLAN.
 13. CITY CODE REQUIRES 76 MINIMUM PARKING SPACES, BUT
 235 SPACES ARE PROVIDED. PLEASE CLARIFY WHY SO MANY
 PARKING SPACES ARE NEEDED.
 14. INDICATE THE NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF COMPACT
 PARKING SPACES. ALL COMPACT SPACES SHOULD BE MARKED
 WITH CORRESPONDING PAVEMENT MARKING.
 15. ALL PARKING SPACES NEXT TO WALLS SHOULD INCLUDE 1
 TO 2 FEET CLEARANCE PER CITY CODE 94-111(C). PLEASE
 VERIFY.
 16. DIMENSION ALL PARKING AISLE WIDTH, INCLUDING THE
 SHORT PARKING AISLES IN THE GARAGE.
 17. PAYMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR REMOVAL OF ON-STREET
 PARKING SPACES ALONG GARDENIA. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH
 PARKING ADMINISTRATION FOR THE PROCESS AND DETAILS.
 18. THE DEMO PLAN (C-03) SHOWS THAT THE EXISTING CURB
 AND PARKING STALL STRIPING ON GARDENIA STREET ARE
 REMOVED BUT SOME OF THEM ARE NOT RE-CONSTRUCTED PER
 OTHER PLAN SHEETS. PLEASE CLARIFY.
 19. ON THE PAVING, MARKING AND SIGNAGE PLAN SHEET
 (C-11), SHOW HOW THE NEW PARKING STALL STRIPING ARE
 COMPATIBLE WITH THE EXISTING PARKING STALL STRIPING
 WEST OF THE SITE ON GARDENIA STREET.
 20. PROVIDE CIRCULATION ROUTES AND SHOW AUTOTURN PATHS
 FOR ALL DELIVERY, SERVICE VEHICLES AND GARBAGE TRUCKS.
 21. SHOW THE REQUIRED 20-FOOT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE AT
 THE CORNER OF GARDENIA STREET/DIXIE HIGHWAY AND DIXIE
 HIGHWAY/ALLEY.
 22. ON THE PAVING, MARKING AND SIGNAGE PLAN SHEET
 (C-11), "DO NOT ENTER" SIGNS SHOULD BE PROVIDED ON THE
 ONE-WAY ENTRY AND EXIT AT THE SITE DRIVEWAY AS
 APPROPRIATE.
 23. AT A MINIMUM, THE ROAD SHALL BE MILLED/RESURFACED
 AT MIN OF 1 INCH FOR FULL LANE WIDTH OF THE TRAVEL
 LANE(S) ENCROACHED BY THE TRENCH AREA, INCLUDING A
 TRANSITION AREA OF 50 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE TRENCH.
  
  
 CONDITIONS:
 1. NO SELF-PARKING SHALL BE ALLOWED INSIDE THE GARAGE
 WHEREVER PARKING AISLE IS LESS THAN 24-FOOT WIDE.
 2. PROVIDE EASEMENT FOR THE PORTION OF SIDEWALK OUTSIDE
 PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 3. PROVIDE MICROMOBILITY FACILITIES ON-SITE
 4. PROVIDE TDM MEASURES TO BE IMPLEMENTED AS PART OF
 THE DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO:
 A. UNBUNDLED PARKING/PARKING CASH-OUT PROGRAM FOR
 EMPLOYEES
 B. TRANSIT PASS SUBSIDY FOR EMPLOYEES
  
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 [email protected]
 561-494-1092
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 11-12-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-11-12 14:56:53***1ST REVIEW FROM TRAFFIC***
  
 TRAFFIC STUDY COMMENTS:
 1. PROVIDE A TRAFFIC STATEMENT.
 2. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER.
 3. INCLUDE PCN NUMBER(S) AND PROPERTY STREET
 ADDRESS(ES) ON TRAFFIC STUDY.
 4. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH ENGINEERING ON THE STUDY
 INTERSECTIONS AND TRAFFIC STUDY REQUIREMENTS.
 SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
 5. REDUCE THE WIDTH OF THE TWO ONE-WAY DRIVEWAYS TO 12
 FEET ON GARDENIA STREET.
 6. CLARIFY THE OPERATION OF THE AREA IN FRONT OF THE
 LOBBY. WOULD VALET BE PROVIDED? VEHICLE CIRCULATION
 SHOULD BE CONTAINED ON-SITE.
 7. PROVIDE TURNAROUND SPACE FOR THE DEAD-END PARKING
 SPACE ON THE 5TH FLOOR.
 8. PARKING AISLE WIDTH SHOULD BE 24 FEET.
 9. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING SPACES PER CITY
 CODE 94-113.
 10. SHOW CURBS AND CURB-CUTS ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF
 STREETS.
 11. SHOW FULL RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH AND RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH
 FROM CENTERLINE ON SITE PLAN.
 12. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS SHOULD BE LOCATED AT LEAST
 15 FEET FROM EXISTING PARKING SPACES AND AWAY FROM
 PEDESTRIAN PATHS.
 13. PROVIDE EASEMENT FOR THE PORTION OF SIDEWALK
 OUTSIDE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 14. THE BUILDING DOORS SHOULD NOT OPEN INTO PEDESTRIAN
 WALKWAY/SIDEWALK ON GARDENIA STREET.
 15. CLARIFY IF THERE WILL BE PEDESTRIANS ACCESSING THE
 BUILDING VIA THE ALLEY AS THERE ARE DOORS FROM THE
 OFFICE/WORK ROOM OPENED INTO THE ALLEY AND ACCESS TO
 THE STAIRS.
 16. PLEASE CLARIFY HOW THE ALLEY IS PLANNED TO BE USED
 RELATED TO LOADING, DELIVERY, GARBAGE COLLECTION,
 VEHICLE CIRCULATION, ETC.
 17. REPAVE BOTH SIDES OF GARDENIA STREET AND THE ALLEY
 ALONG THE SITE FRONTAGE.
 18. PROVIDE ON-STREET PARKING ALONG GARDENIA STREET AND
 DIXIE HIGHWAY.
 19. PROVIDE AUTOTURN PATHS FOR DELIVERY AND GARBAGE
 TRUCKS.
 20. CONSIDER PROVIDING BIKESHARE AND MICROMOBILITY
 FACILITIES ON-SITE
 21. CONSIDER PROVIDING TDM MEASURES TO BE IMPLEMENTED
 AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED
 TO:
 A. UNBUNDLED PARKING/PARKING CASH-OUT PROGRAM FOR
 EMPLOYEES
 B. TRANSIT PASS SUBSIDY FOR EMPLOYEES
  
 SHING TSOI
 CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
 561-494-1141
 [email protected]
 (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS)
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-08-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 11-08-2019 Time   Rev Time 4.00
Received By rrossano Date 11-08-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-11-08 10:08:57PLEASE SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG - PPRC.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 03-22-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By aaponte Date 03-22-2021 Time 16:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aaponte Date 02-19-2021 Time 14:15 Sent To  
Notes
2021-03-17 16:31:44COMMENTS FOR RESUBMITTAL DATED 2-19-21
 PREVIOUS COMMENT 14, 15, 16 AND 30 WOULD NEED A
 VARIANCE REQUEST TO THE DAC.
 1. PLEASE LIST BIKE RACKS REQUIRED ON ROW IN SITE PLAN.
 I BIKE RACK PER EVERY 150 FEET OF FRONTAGE REQUIRED.
 2. PLEASE INCLUDE A PROJECT INFOR TABLE IN THE SITE
 PLAN SHEET INCLUDING SITE AREA, MAXIMUM GROSS BUILDING
 AREA PERMITTED, AND PROPOSED. NUMBER OF ROOMS PROPOSED,
 RESTAURANT AND MEETING ROOMS PROPOSED, AND PARKING
 CALCULATION.
 3. PLEASE CONFIRM THE CALCUALTION FOR THE GROSS
 BUILIDING AREA IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DEFINITION IN
 SECTION 94-109 OF THE ZLDRS. IN THE SUBMITTED SHEE
 A0.01 AND A0.02 PLEASE CLARIFY THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN
 FAR AND GROSS. PLEASE USE THE DEFINITION IN SEC 94-109
 FOR GROSS BUILDING AREA.
 4. PORTE COCHERE SHALL COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS FOR
 PORTE COCHERE IN SEC 94-109 AND FIGURE IV-22.
 5. PLEASE EXPLORE IF THE PARAPET WALL OF THE TOP LEVEL
 OF THE GARAGE CAN BE REDUCED.
 5. SIGNS SHOWN IN ELEVATIONS EXCEED THE MAXIMUM NUMBER
 ALLOWED FOR IDENTITY SIGNS. SIGNS WOULD NOT BE INCLUDED
 IN THE SITE PLAN APROVAL.
 6. PLEASE PROVIDE PHOTOS OF THE WOOD-LOOK STUCCO
 PROPOSED ON THE FACADE.
  
 CONDITIONS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
 1. PROJECT SHALL PAY FOR FOUR ON-STREET PARKING SPACES
 REMOVED.
 2. DEVELOPER SHALL ENTER INTO A LANDSCAPE AND HARDSCAPE
 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY FOR ELEMENTS
 INSTALLED WITHIN THE ROW.
 3. PROPOSED CANOPY OVER ALLEY SHALL BE DETAILED FOR
 SEPARATE REVIEW. A SEPARATE AGREEMENT WILL BE NEEDED.
 4. A ROW AERIAL ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT WILL BE NEEDED
 FOR THE CANOPY ENCROACHING OVER DIXIE HWAY ROW. A
 SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION WILL BE NEEDED.
  
 FOR RESUBMITTAL:
 - PLEASE INCLUDE A COPY OF THE SURVEY WITH EVERY
 RESUBMITTAL PACKAGE.
 - PLEASE SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH OF
 THE COMMENTS. IDENTIFY THE SHEETS WHERE THE COMMENT IS
 ADDRESS.
 - PLEASE SUBMIT 1 LARGE SET MAXIMUM 24" BY 36", AND A
 DIGITAL COPY OF ALL THE DRAWINGS, RESPONSE LETTER AND
 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION.
 - PLEASE UTILIZE THE GUIDELINES FOR RESUBMITTAL. A
 MEETING WITH STAFF IS RECOMMENDED TO DISCUSS THE
 COMMENTS.
  
 AS THE PROJECT IS REQUIRED TO GO TO DAC FOR THE
 APPROVAL OF 4 VARIANCES, PLEASE SUBMIT AN APPLICATION
 FOR DAC ONCE THE COMMENTS FROM PPRC HAVE BEEN
 ADDRESSES.
  
 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA
 APONTE AT 561-822-1439.
  
  
 COMMENTS FOR RESUBMITTAL DATED 4-14-20
 COMMENTS ARE LISTED AS SATISFIED OR NOT SATISFIED.
 ADDITIONAL NOTES ARE ADDED TO CLARIFY THE COMMENT.
 SENTENCE AFTER * IS THE OLD COMMENT.
 1. SATISFIED-PLEASE PROVIDE A CURRENT SURVEY, NO MORE
 THAN 1 YEAR OLD. PLEASE INCLUDE THE DIMENSION OF THE
 EXISTING SIDEWALK IN SURVEY, AND IMPROVEMENTS ALONG
 NORTH SIDE OF GARDENIA STREET.
 2. SATISFIED-PLEASE ADJUST THE SITE AREA IN SHEET A1.01
 TO REFLECT LOT SIZE AS INDICATED IN SURVEY. SITE IS
 32,522SF. PROJECT FACT SHEET ALSO HAS A DIFFERENT SITE
 AREA (32,527SF).
 3. SATISFIED AT 2-19-21- NOT SATISFIED - TO CLEARLY
 INDICATE THE AREAS COUNTED AS FAR PLEASE PROVIDE A
 COLOR CODER FLOOR PLAN FOR EACH LEVEL INDICATING AREAS
 COUNTED AND NOT COUNTED. ANY FULLY ENCLOSED STORAGE
 AREAS SHALL BE COUNTED AS FAR.*PLEASE PROVIDE A
 DETAILED ANALYSIS OF THE AREAS IDENTIFIED AS GROSS
 BUILDING AREA (GBA) ACCORDING TO THE DEFINITION IN
 SECTION 94-109 OF THE ZLDR.
 4. SATISFIED AT 2-19-21-NOT SATISFIED - PLEASE INDICATE
 PROPERTY LINES AND MINIMUM REQUIRED SETBACK LINES IN
 ALL FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS.
 5. SATISFIED AT 2-19- 21- NOT SATISFIED- PROPOSED CURB
 CUTS ARE 17' IN WIDTH. PLEASE STUDY THE POSSIBILITY TO
 REDUCE THE WIDTH OF THE CURB CUT TO AT LEAST 12' IN
 WIDTH EACH.*DROP-OFF CURB CUT SHALL BE REDUCED TO A
 MAXIMUM 12 FEET IN WIDTH, LESS IF POSSIBLE TO MINIMIZE
 THE PEDESTRIAN IMPACT.
 6. SATISFIED -PLEASE COORDINATE THE PROJECT DATA IN THE
 DIFFERENT SHEETS. PROJECT FACT SHEET INDICATES 128
 HOTEL ROOMS AND DOES NOT MENTION ANY RESIDENTIAL UNIT.
 SP-1 LIST 152 HOTEL ROOMS AND DOES NOT LIST ANY
 RESIDENTIAL UNIT, BUT SHEET A1.05 LIST 128 HOTEL ROOMS
 AND 4,084 SF APARTMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE A CONSOLIDATED
 PROJECT DATA IN THE SITE PLAN SHEET.
 7. SATISFIED AT 2-19-21- NOT SATISFIED- PARKING
 CALCULATION IN SITE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE THE REQUIRED
 PARKING FOR PROPOSED RETAIL AND MEETING AREAS.PLEASE
 INCLUDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED BIKE PARKING AT 1/15
 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED (16 REQUIRED) + PUBLIC BIKE
 RACKS AT 1/100 LINEAR FEET OF FRONTAGE (4 REQUIRED ON
 SIDEWALK).* PARKING CALCULATION SHALL ACCOUNT FOR THE
 REQUIRED PARKING ASSOCIATED WITH THE EXISTING MARRIOTT
 RESIDENCE INN (42 PARKING SPACES). A RESTRICTIVE
 COVENANT SHALL BE RECORDED ENSURING THE 42 SPACES ARE
 PROVIDED FOR THE EXISTING MARRIOTT RESIDENCE INN.
 8. SATISFIED AT 2-19-21-NOT SATISFIED- PLEASE INCLUDE A
 NOTE IN THE CIVIL DRAWINGS STATING THAT THE SIDEWALK
 ELEVATION SHALL BE MAINTAINED ACROSS THE CURB
 CUT.*SIDEWALK ELEVATION SHALL BE MAINTAINED ACROSS CURB
 CUTS. PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSING
 THAT REQUIREMENT.
 9. NOTED- NOT SATISFIED- PLEASE INCLUDE THE APPROVED
 COSMOPOLITAN SITE PLAN WITH YOUR SITE PLAN TO ENSURE
 THE PROPOSED STREET DESIGN AND ON-STREET PARKING WORKS.
 ENGINEERING NEEDS TO CONFIRM ON-STREET PARKING ON BOTH
 SIDES OF GARDENIA IS VIABLE. *SITE PLAN INDICATES THE
 REMOVAL OF THE 8 EXISTING ON-STREET PARKING SPACES. IS
 THE PROJECT RELOCATING THE EXISTING CURB? PLEASE
 INDICATE HOW THE PROPOSED CURB RELOCATION AFFECTS THE
 WEST SIDE OF THE PROJECT AND THE EXISTING SECTION.
 CONSIDER THE NEW PROJECT CURRENTLY APPROVED ALONG THE
 NORTH SIDE OF GARDENIA STREET. INCORPORATE THAT PROJECT
 IN THE SITE PLAN FOR CONTEXT PURPOSES.
 10. SATISFIED- A PAYMENT FOR THE FOUR SPACES REMOVED
 WILL BE REQUIRED. *IF ON-STREET PARKING IS REMOVED,
 PROJECT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PARKING METER
 REMOVAL FEE.
 11. SATISFIED AT 2-19-21-PARTIALLY SATISFIED- PLEASE
 PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DETAILS ON THE PROPOSED FABRIC SAILS
 TO COVER GARAGE AND INCLUDE A CALCULATION OF THE
 PERCENTAGE COVERED BY THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE TO CONFIRM
 COMPLIANCE WITH 30% COVERAGE. *EXPOSED PARKING DECK
 REQUIRES 10% OF GROUND FLOOR PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. TWO
 PROPOSED OPEN SPACES AT GROUND LEVEL DO NOT COMPLY WITH
 THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS. MINIMUM SIZE IS
 900SF, MINIMUM ACTIVE USE ABUTMENT IS REQUIRED, AND IT
 SHALL BE OPEN TO THE SKY. PLEASE SEE SEC 94-109 AND
 TABLE IV-7.
 12. SATISFIED -* REFLECTIVE GLASS IS NOT ALLOWED AT THE
 GROUND LEVEL, IT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH TRANSPARENCY
 REQUIREMENTS.
 13. SATISFIED - * PARKING ENTRANCE CEILING SHALL BE
 FINISHED AT A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 20 FEET. UTILITIES SHALL
 NOT BE EXPOSED.
 14. NOT SATISFIED- *VARIANCE REQUEST FOR THE SETBACK
 ABOVE 3RD FLOOR PARKING REQUIRES DAC APPROVAL.
 15. NOT SATISFIED -* VARIANCE REQUEST REGARDING THE
 AISLE WIDTH REQUIRES ENGINEERING REVIEW BEFORE IT CAN
 BE PRESENTED TO DAC FOR APPROVAL.PLEASE PROVIDE
 INFORMATION TO JUSTIFY THE REQUEST AND PROVE THAT
 PARKNG CIRCULATION STILL FUNCTIONS.
 16. NOT SATISFIED- PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THE PLANAR BREAK
 REQUIREMENT CANNOT BE MET.
 17. NOT SATISFIED- PLEASE IDENTIFY OTHER ALTERNATIVES
 TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED DEPTH FOR THE PLANAR BREAK. IN
 ADDITION, THE WEST ELEVATION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE
 BLANK WALL REGULATION, AND SOUTH ELEVATION (FACADE
 CLOSEST TO DIXIE) SEEMS NOT TO COMPLY WITH THE BLANK
 WALL REGULATION EITHER. THE PORTION OF THE SOUTH
 ELEVATION CLOSEST TO DIXIE HWAY IS HIGHLY VISIBLE FROM
 THE STREET AND NEEDS TO BE TREATED AS A STREET FACADE,
 NOT AS AN ALLEY FACADE. FENESTRATION CAN BE PROVIDED.
 PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH
 TABLE IV-4 REGARDING ALL ELEMENTS LISTED. BLANK WALLS
 ARE NOT ALLOWED. PROVIDE GRAPHIC INFORMATION TO CONFIRM
 COMPLIANCE.
 18. SATISFIED PLEASE CLARIFY LOCATION OF PROPOSED
 CANOPY OVER ALLEY. PROPOSED CANOPY OVER ALLEY REQUIRES
 AN AERIAL EASEMENT FROM THE CITY.
 19. NOT SATISFIED- DUE TO THE VARIANCE REQUEST PROJECT
 IS REQUIRED TO GO TO THE DAC FOR APPROVAL OF REQUESTED
 VARIANCES.
 20. SATISFIED - PLEASE PROVIDE SECTIONS OF THE PROJECT.
 21. PARTIALLY SATISFIED- PLEASE PROVIDE CONTEXT
 ELEVATIONS *PLEASE PROVIDE CONTEXT COLORED ELEVATIONS
 INCLUDING CALL OUT MATERIALS, INCLUDING PICTURES OF
 PROPOSED MATERIALS.
 22. SATISFIED -PLEASE EXPLAIN GARBAGE COLLECTION
 OPERATION.
 23. SATISFIED- PEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM
 COMPLIANCE WITH BIKE PARKING REQUIREMENTS ALONG THE
 STREET FRONTAGE (1 SPACE/ 100 FEET OF FRONTAGE, AND
 INSIDE THE PROJECT SITE (1 BIKE SPACE/15 SPACES
 PROVIDED).
 24. SATISFIED AT 2-19-21 -PARTIALLY SATISFIED - PLEASE
 INCLUDE A NOT TO CONFIRM THE POLE AND FIXTURE ARE COLOR
 BLACK. *PROJECT IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE LIGHTING ALONG
 STREET FRONTAGE WITH MINIMUM 0.6 FOOTCANDLES. PLEASE
 PROVIDE PHOTOMETRICS AND DETAILS OF REQUIRED STREET
 LIGHTING TO FOLLOW CITY STANDARDS.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO RESUBMITTAL 4-14-20
 25. NOTSATISFIED- PLEASE ADJUST THE PARKING STALLS TO
 MEET THE MINIMUM 8-6" AND ALLOW THE ADDITONAL SPACE (1
 FOOT) FOR THOSE SPACES THAT HAVE COLUMNS OR WALLS AT
 ONE SIDE OF THE STALL. *PLEASE UPDATE PARKING STRIPING
 DETAIL TO REFLECT CITY STANDARD.
 26. SATISFIED- HANDICAP SPACES NEED TO MEET THE ADA
 REQUIREDMENTS (12' IN WIDTH WITH A 5' ACCESS AISLE).
 27. SATISFIED- PLEASE DIMENSIONED ALL PARKING SPACES.
 28. SATISFIED- PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF ENTRANCE
 CANOPY IN THE FLOOR PLAN. AN AERIAL EASEMENT WILL BE
 REQUIRED.
 29. PARTIALLY SATISFIED- PLEASE CONFIRM THE PROPOSED
 DOORS CAN SWING INSIDE DUE TO FIRE REQUIREMENTS. IF NOT
 PERMITTED A RECESSES AREA SHALL BE CREATED FOR THE
 DOOR. *DOORS OPENING TO THE SIDEWALK CANNOT ENCROACH
 INTO THE SIDEWALK PATH OF TRAVEL AND SHALL BE RECESSED.
 PROPOSED RETAIL ON GARDENIA SHALL HAVE A DOOR FROM THE
 STREET.
 30. NOT SATISFIED - PLEASE EVALUATE IF THE SOUTHERN
 PORTION OF THE 8TH FLOOR CORRIDOR CAN BE DIRECTED INTO
 THE STAIR, RESULTING IN ONLY A DOUBLE HIGH SPACE
 ENCROACHING INTO THE CONDITIONAL SETBACK. * NEW EVENT
 SPACE ON 7TH FLOOR IS DOUBLE HEIGHT AND THEREFORE IT IS
 ENCROACHING INTO THE MINIMUM CONDITIONAL SETBACK
 REQUIRED ALONG DIXIE HWAY.
 31. SATISFIED * PROPOSED PALMS AT THE ENTRACE ON DIXIE
 HWAY SHALL BE REPLACED WITH LIVE OAKS TO MAINTAIN THE
 SHADE CANOPY
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 06-15-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By aaponte Date 06-15-2020 Time 10:49 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aaponte Date 06-12-2020 Time 14:32 Sent To  
Notes
2020-06-12 17:39:13501 S DIXIE HWAY - AC MARRIOTT COMMENTS RESUBMITTAL
 4-14-20
 COMMENTS ARE LISTED AS SATISFIED OR NOT SATISFIED.
 ADDITIONAL NOTES ARE ADDED TO CLARIFY THE COMMENT.
 SENTENCE AFTER * IS THE OLD COMMENT.
 1. SATISFIED-PLEASE PROVIDE A CURRENT SURVEY, NO MORE
 THAN 1 YEAR OLD. PLEASE INCLUDE THE DIMENSION OF THE
 EXISTING SIDEWALK IN SURVEY, AND IMPROVEMENTS ALONG
 NORTH SIDE OF GARDENIA STREET.
 2. SATISFIED-PLEASE ADJUST THE SITE AREA IN SHEET A1.01
 TO REFLECT LOT SIZE AS INDICATED IN SURVEY. SITE IS
 32,522SF. PROJECT FACT SHEET ALSO HAS A DIFFERENT SITE
 AREA (32,527SF).
 3. NOT SATISFIED - TO CLEARLY INDICATE THE AREAS
 COUNTED AS FAR PLEASE PROVIDE A COLOR CODER FLOOR PLAN
 FOR EACH LEVEL INDICATING AREAS COUNTED AND NOT
 COUNTED. ANY FULLY ENCLOSED STORAGE AREAS SHALL BE
 COUNTED AS FAR.*PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAILED ANALYSIS OF
 THE AREAS IDENTIFIED AS GROSS BUILDING AREA (GBA)
 ACCORDING TO THE DEFINITION IN SECTION 94-109 OF THE
 ZLDR.
 4. NOT SATISFIED - PLEASE INDICATE PROPERTY LINES AND
 MINIMUM REQUIRED SETBACK LINES IN ALL FLOOR PLANS AND
 ELEVATIONS.
 5. NOT SATISFIED- PROPOSED CURB CUTS ARE 17' IN WIDTH.
 PLEASE STUDY THE POSSIBILITY TO REDUCE THE WIDTH OF THE
 CURB CUT TO AT LEAST 12' IN WIDTH EACH.*DROP-OFF CURB
 CUT SHALL BE REDUCED TO A MAXIMUM 12 FEET IN WIDTH,
 LESS IF POSSIBLE TO MINIMIZE THE PEDESTRIAN IMPACT.
 6. SATISFIED -PLEASE COORDINATE THE PROJECT DATA IN THE
 DIFFERENT SHEETS. PROJECT FACT SHEET INDICATES 128
 HOTEL ROOMS AND DOES NOT MENTION ANY RESIDENTIAL UNIT.
 SP-1 LIST 152 HOTEL ROOMS AND DOES NOT LIST ANY
 RESIDENTIAL UNIT, BUT SHEET A1.05 LIST 128 HOTEL ROOMS
 AND 4,084 SF APARTMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE A CONSOLIDATED
 PROJECT DATA IN THE SITE PLAN SHEET.
 7. NOT SATISFIED- PARKING CALCULATION IN SITE PLAN
 SHALL INCLUDE THE REQUIRED PARKING FOR PROPOSED RETAIL
 AND MEETING AREAS.PLEASE INCLUDE CALCULATIONS FOR
 REQUIRED BIKE PARKING AT 1/15 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED
 (16 REQUIRED) + PUBLIC BIKE RACKS AT 1/100 LINEAR FEET
 OF FRONTAGE (4 REQUIRED ON SIDEWALK).* PARKING
 CALCULATION SHALL ACCOUNT FOR THE REQUIRED PARKING
 ASSOCIATED WITH THE EXISTING MARRIOTT RESIDENCE INN (42
 PARKING SPACES). A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT SHALL BE
 RECORDED ENSURING THE 42 SPACES ARE PROVIDED FOR THE
 EXISTING MARRIOTT RESIDENCE INN.
 8. NOT SATISFIED- PLEASE INCLUDE A NOTE IN THE CIVIL
 DRAWINGS STATING THAT THE SIDEWALK ELEVATION SHALL BE
 MAINTAINED ACROSS THE CURB CUT.*SIDEWALK ELEVATION
 SHALL BE MAINTAINED ACROSS CURB CUTS. PLEASE PROVIDE A
 DETAIL SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSING THAT REQUIREMENT.
 9. NOT SATISFIED- PLEASE INCLUDE THE APPROVED
 COSMOPOLITAN SITE PLAN WITH YOUR SITE PLAN TO ENSURE
 THE PROPOSED STREET DESIGN AND ON-STREET PARKING WORKS.
 ENGINEERING NEEDS TO CONFIRM ON-STREET PARKING ON BOTH
 SIDES OF GARDENIA IS VIABLE. *SITE PLAN INDICATES THE
 REMOVAL OF THE 8 EXISTING ON-STREET PARKING SPACES. IS
 THE PROJECT RELOCATING THE EXISTING CURB? PLEASE
 INDICATE HOW THE PROPOSED CURB RELOCATION AFFECTS THE
 WEST SIDE OF THE PROJECT AND THE EXISTING SECTION.
 CONSIDER THE NEW PROJECT CURRENTLY APPROVED ALONG THE
 NORTH SIDE OF GARDENIA STREET. INCORPORATE THAT PROJECT
 IN THE SITE PLAN FOR CONTEXT PURPOSES.
 10. SATISFIED- A PAYMENT FOR THE FOUR SPACES REMOVED
 WILL BE REQUIRED. *IF ON-STREET PARKING IS REMOVED,
 PROJECT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PARKING METER
 REMOVAL FEE.
 11. PARTIALLY SATISFIED- PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL
 DETAILS ON THE PROPOSED FABRIC SAILS TO COVER GARAGE
 AND INCLUDE A CALCULATION OF THE PERCENTAGE COVERED BY
 THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH 30%
 COVERAGE. *EXPOSED PARKING DECK REQUIRES 10% OF GROUND
 FLOOR PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. TWO PROPOSED OPEN SPACES AT
 GROUND LEVEL DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE
 REQUIREMENTS. MINIMUM SIZE IS 900SF, MINIMUM ACTIVE USE
 ABUTMENT IS REQUIRED, AND IT SHALL BE OPEN TO THE SKY.
 PLEASE SEE SEC 94-109 AND TABLE IV-7.
 12. SATISFIED -* REFLECTIVE GLASS IS NOT ALLOWED AT THE
 GROUND LEVEL, IT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH TRANSPARENCY
 REQUIREMENTS.
 13. SATISFIED - * PARKING ENTRANCE CEILING SHALL BE
 FINISHED AT A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 20 FEET. UTILITIES SHALL
 NOT BE EXPOSED.
 14. NOT SATISFIED- *VARIANCE REQUEST FOR THE SETBACK
 ABOVE 3RD FLOOR PARKING REQUIRES DAC APPROVAL.
 15. NOT SATISFIED -* VARIANCE REQUEST REGARDING THE
 AISLE WIDTH REQUIRES ENGINEERING REVIEW BEFORE IT CAN
 BE PRESENTED TO DAC FOR APPROVAL.PLEASE PROVIDE
 INFORMATION TO JUSTIFY THE REQUEST AND PROVE THAT
 PARKNG CIRCULATION STILL FUNCTIONS.
 16. NOT SATISFIED- PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THE PLANAR BREAK
 REQUIREMENT CANNOT BE MET.
 17. NOT SATISFIED- PLEASE IDENTIFY OTHER ALTERNATIVES
 TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED DEPTH FOR THE PLANAR BREAK. IN
 ADDITION, THE WEST ELEVATION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE
 BLANK WALL REGULATION, AND SOUTH ELEVATION (FACADE
 CLOSEST TO DIXIE) SEEMS NOT TO COMPLY WITH THE BLANK
 WALL REGULATION EITHER. THE PORTION OF THE SOUTH
 ELEVATION CLOSEST TO DIXIE HWAY IS HIGHLY VISIBLE FROM
 THE STREET AND NEEDS TO BE TREATED AS A STREET FACADE,
 NOT AS AN ALLEY FACADE. FENESTRATION CAN BE PROVIDED.
 PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH
 TABLE IV-4 REGARDING ALL ELEMENTS LISTED. BLANK WALLS
 ARE NOT ALLOWED. PROVIDE GRAPHIC INFORMATION TO CONFIRM
 COMPLIANCE.
 18. SATISFIED PLEASE CLARIFY LOCATION OF PROPOSED
 CANOPY OVER ALLEY. PROPOSED CANOPY OVER ALLEY REQUIRES
 AN AERIAL EASEMENT FROM THE CITY.
 19. NOT SATISFIED- DUE TO THE VARIANCE REQUEST PROJECT
 IS REQUIRED TO GO TO THE DAC FOR APPROVAL OF REQUESTED
 VARIANCES.
 20. SATISFIED - PLEASE PROVIDE SECTIONS OF THE PROJECT.
 21. PARTIALLY SATISFIED- PLEASE PROVIDE CONTEXT
 ELEVATIONS *PLEASE PROVIDE CONTEXT COLORED ELEVATIONS
 INCLUDING CALL OUT MATERIALS, INCLUDING PICTURES OF
 PROPOSED MATERIALS.
 22. SATISFIED -PLEASE EXPLAIN GARBAGE COLLECTION
 OPERATION.
 23. SATISFIED- PEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM
 COMPLIANCE WITH BIKE PARKING REQUIREMENTS ALONG THE
 STREET FRONTAGE (1 SPACE/ 100 FEET OF FRONTAGE, AND
 INSIDE THE PROJECT SITE (1 BIKE SPACE/15 SPACES
 PROVIDED).
 24. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - PLEASE INCLUDE A NOT TO
 CONFIRM THE POLE AND FIXTURE ARE COLOR BLACK. *PROJECT
 IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE LIGHTING ALONG STREET FRONTAGE
 WITH MINIMUM 0.6 FOOTCANDLES. PLEASE PROVIDE
 PHOTOMETRICS AND DETAILS OF REQUIRED STREET LIGHTING TO
 FOLLOW CITY STANDARDS.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO RESUBMITTAL 4-14-20
 25. PLEASE UPDATE PARKING STRIPING DETAIL TO REFLECT
 CITY STANDARD.
 26. HANDICAP SPACES NEED TO MEET THE ADA REQUIREDMENTS
 (12' IN WIDTH WITH A 5' ACCESS AISLE).
 27. PLEASE DIMENSIONED ALL PARKING SPACES.
 28. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF ENTRANCE CANOPY IN
 THE FLOOR PLAN. AN AERIAL EASEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED.
 29. DOORS OPENING TO THE SIDEWALK CANNOT ENCROACH INTO
 THE SIDEWALK PATH OF TRAVEL AND SHALL BE RECESSED.
 PROPOSED RETAIL ON GARDENIA SHALL HAVE A DOOR FROM THE
 STREET.
 30. NEW EVENT SPACE ON 7TH FLOOR IS DOUBLE HEIGHT AND
 THEREFORE IT IS ENCROACHING INTO THE MINIMUM
 CONDITIONAL SETBACK REQUIRED ALONG DIXIE HWAY.
 31. PROPOSED PALMS AT THE ENTRACE ON DIXIE HWAY SHALL
 BE REPLACED WITH LIVE OAKS TO MAINTAIN THE SHADE CANOPY
  
 RESUBMITTAL
 PLEASE SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH OF THE
 COMMENTS. IDENTIFY THE SHEETS WHERE THE COMMENT IS
 ADDRESS.
 PLEASE SUBMIT 1 LARGE SET MAXIMUM 24" BY 36", ONE SET
 11" BY 17" AND A DIGITAL COPY OF ALL THE DRAWINGS,
 RESPONSE LETTER AND SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION.
 PLEASE UTILIZE THE GUIDELINES FOR RESUBMITTAL. A
 MEETING WITH STAFF IS RECOMMENDED TO DISCUSS THE
 COMMENTS.
 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA
 APONTE AT 561-822-1439.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-13-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By aaponte Date 11-13-2019 Time 11:49 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aaponte Date 11-13-2019 Time 11:48 Sent To  
Notes
2019-11-13 12:34:11501 S DIXIE HWAY - AC MARRIOTT COMMENTS PPRC 11/13/19
  
 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A CURRENT SURVEY, NO MORE THAN 1 YEAR
 OLD. PLEASE INCLUDE THE DIMENSION OF THE EXISTING
 SIDEWALK IN SURVEY, AND IMPROVEMENTS ALONG NORTH SIDE
 OF GARDENIA STREET.
 2. PLEASE ADJUST THE SITE AREA IN SHEET A1.01 TO
 REFLECT LOT SIZE AS INDICATED IN SURVEY. SITE IS
 32,522SF. PROJECT FACT SHEET ALSO HAS A DIFFERENT SITE
 AREA (32,527SF).
 3. PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAILED ANALYSIS OF THE AREAS
 IDENTIFIED AS GROSS BUILDING AREA (GBA) ACCORDING TO
 THE DEFINITION IN SECTION 94-109 OF THE ZLDR.
 4. PLEASE INDICATE PROPERTY LINES AND MINIMUM REQUIRED
 SETBACK LINES IN ALL FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS.
 5. DROP-OFF CURB CUT SHALL BE REDUCED TO A MAXIMUM 12
 FEET IN WIDTH, LESS IF POSSIBLE TO MINIMIZE THE
 PEDESTRIAN IMPACT.
 6. PLEASE COORDINATE THE PROJECT DATA IN THE DIFFERENT
 SHEETS. PROJECT FACT SHEET INDICATES 128 HOTEL ROOMS
 AND DOES NOT MENTION ANY RESIDENTIAL UNIT. SP-1 LIST
 152 HOTEL ROOMS AND DOES NOT LIST ANY RESIDENTIAL UNIT,
 BUT SHEET A1.05 LIST 128 HOTEL ROOMS AND 4,084 SF
 APARTMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE A CONSOLIDATED PROJECT DATA
 IN THE SITE PLAN SHEET.
 7. PARKING CALCULATION SHALL ACCOUNT FOR THE REQUIRED
 PARKING ASSOCIATED WITH THE EXISTING MARRIOTT RESIDENCE
 INN (42 PARKING SPACES). A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT SHALL
 BE RECORDED ENSURING THE 42 SPACES ARE PROVIDED FOR THE
 EXISTING MARRIOTT RESIDENCE INN.
 8. SIDEWALK ELEVATION SHALL BE MAINTAINED ACROSS CURB
 CUTS. PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSING
 THAT REQUIREMENT.
 9. SITE PLAN INDICATES THE REMOVAL OF THE 8 EXISTING
 ON-STREET PARKING SPACES. IS THE PROJECT RELOCATING THE
 EXISTING CURB? PLEASE INDICATE HOW THE PROPOSED CURB
 RELOCATION AFFECTS THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROJECT AND THE
 EXISTING SECTION. CONSIDER THE NEW PROJECT CURRENTLY
 APPROVED ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF GARDENIA STREET.
 INCORPORATE THAT PROJECT IN THE SITE PLAN FOR CONTEXT
 PURPOSES.
 10. IF ON-STREET PARKING IS REMOVED, PROJECT SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PARKING METER REMOVAL FEE.
 11. EXPOSED PARKING DECK REQUIRES 10% OF GROUND FLOOR
 PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. TWO PROPOSED OPEN SPACES AT GROUND
 LEVEL DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE
 REQUIREMENTS. MINIMUM SIZE IS 900SF, MINIMUM ACTIVE USE
 ABUTMENT IS REQUIRED, AND IT SHALL BE OPEN TO THE SKY.
 PLEASE SEE SEC 94-109 AND TABLE IV-7.
 12. REFLECTIVE GLASS IS NOT ALLOWED AT THE GROUND
 LEVEL, IT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH TRANSPARENCY
 REQUIREMENTS.
 13. PARKING ENTRANCE CEILING SHALL BE FINISHED AT A
 MINIMUM DEPTH OF 20 FEET. UTILITIES SHALL NOT BE
 EXPOSED.
 14. VARIANCE REQUEST FOR THE SETBACK ABOVE 3RD FLOOR
 PARKING REQUIRES DAC APPROVAL.
 15. VARIANCE REQUEST REGARDING THE AISLE WIDTH REQUIRES
 ENGINEERING REVIEW BEFORE IT CAN BE PRESENTED TO DAC
 FOR APPROVAL.PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO JUSTIFY THE
 REQUEST AND PROVE THAT PARKNG CIRCULATION STILL
 FUNCTIONS.
 16. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THE PLANAR BREAK REQUIREMENT
 CANNOT BE MET.
 17. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE
 WITH TABLE IV-4 REGARDING ALL ELEMENTS LISTED. BLANK
 WALL ARE NOT ALLOWED. PROVIDE GRAPHIC INFORMATION TO
 CONFIRM COMPLIANCE.
 18. PLEASE CLARIFY LOCATION OF PROPOSED CANOPY OVER
 ALLEY. PROPOSED CANOPY OVER ALLEY REQUIRES AN AERIAL
 EASEMENT FROM THE CITY.
 19. DUE TO THE VARIANCE REQUEST PROJECT IS REQUIRED TO
 GO TO THE DAC FOR APPROVAL OF REQUESTED VARIANCES.
 20. PLEASE PROVIDE SECTIONS OF THE PROJECT.
 21. PLEASE PROVIDE CONTEXT COLORED ELEVATIONS INCLUDING
 CALL OUT MATERIALS, INCLUDING PICTURES OF PROPOSED
 MATERIALS.
 22. PLEASE EXPLAIN GARBAGE COLLECTION OPERATION.
 23. PEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE
 WITH BIKE PARKING REQUIREMENTS ALONG THE STREET
 FRONTAGE (1 SPACE/ 100 FEET OF FRONTAGE, AND INSIDE THE
 PROJECT SITE (1 BIKE SPACE/15 SPACES PROVIDED).
 24. PROJECT IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE LIGHTING ALONG
 STREET FRONTAGE WITH MINIMUM 0.6 FOOTCANDLES. PLEASE
 PROVIDE PHOTOMETRICS AND DETAILS OF REQUIRED STREET
 LIGHTING TO FOLLOW CITY STANDARDS.
  
  
  
 RESUBMITTAL
 PLEASE SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH OF THE
 COMMENTS. IDENTIFY THE SHEETS WHERE THE COMMENT IS
 ADDRESS.
 PLEASE SUBMIT 10 LARGE SETS MAXIMUM 24" BY 36", ONE SET
 11" BY 17" AND A DIGITAL COPY OF ALL THE DRAWINGS,
 RESPONSE LETTER AND SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION.
 PLEASE UTILIZE THE GUIDELINES FOR RESUBMITTAL.
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved