Home Records and Reports Contractor Records Owner Records Permit Records Permit Reports Business Reports Property Records Business Tax My Account Code Enforcement Contact Us Log In/Out Print Plan Review Stops For Project Z19090015 Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-09-2019 Cont ID   Sent By rbrown Date 10-09-2019 Time 19:46 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rbrown Date 10-09-2019 Time 19:46 Sent To   Notes 2019-10-09 19:55:49 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,   COMMENTS:       1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE   SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH   FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE   ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.       2. FLOOD ZONE. ACCORDING TO THE ADOPTED FLOOD INSURANCE   RATE MAPS (FIRMS), THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS IN FLOOD   ZONE AE, WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 14 FT NAVD. THE   FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL ASSOCIATED   MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS ETC.) SHALL   BE AT OR ABOVE 16 FT NAVD SO THAT THEY ARE THE REQUIRED   24 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION.       3. UNITY OF TITLE. FOR ANY BUILDING CROSSING A PROPERTY   LINE, EITHER A RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE, OR SOME OTHER   APPROVED LEGAL INSTRUMENT, SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE   PERMIT APPLICATION, OR THE BUILDING MUST HAVE A FIRE   WALL ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, PER SECTION 202 OF   FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, FIRE SEPARATION   DISTANCE.       4. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT, THE   PLANS SHALL SHOW AT LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE,   COMPLYING WITH SECTIONS 206.2 AND 402.2 OF FLORIDA   ACCESSIBILITY CODE, CONNECTING ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR   FACILITY ENTRANCES WITH ALL ACCESSIBLE SPACES AND   ELEMENTS WITHIN THE BUILDING OR FACILITY       5. NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. OVERALL SITE   PLAN, SHEET OSP, STATES THAT 9 ACCESSIBLE PARKING   SPACES ARE PROVIDED BUT THE PLANS APPEAR TO SHOW ONLY   8. ALSO 2% OF THE NUMBER OF PROVIDED PARKING SPACES   SHALL BE ACCESSIBLE, SO 11 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES   ARE REQUIRED BECAUSE A TOTAL OF 509 PARKING SPACES ARE   PROPOSED. THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING   SPACES PROVIDED SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAIR   HOUSING ACT AND SECTION 208.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY   CODE.       6. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,   THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR   THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,   AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE   FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.       7. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS   AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE   WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED   FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,   GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND   OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,   SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.       8. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT   WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL   HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT   MICHAEL ORIO, GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494   1080, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]       9. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT   TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE   ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP   ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC   PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:   [email protected]       ROBERT BROWN   BUILDING OFFICIAL   TEL: 561 805 6652   EMAIL: [email protected]     Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 3 Status P Date 01-15-2020 Cont ID   Sent By rrossano Date 01-15-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By rrossano Date 01-15-2020 Time   Sent To   Notes 2020-01-15 11:51:42 PASSED WITH PROVISOS:       1. PLEASE UPDATE LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE AND   RESUBMIT DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING.   2. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL , PROVIDE   CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEMANDS   FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE   FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR   SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER.   3. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL , PLEASE PROVIDE   CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS   CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED AREAS.   4. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL , COORDINATE WITH   MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR WITH   CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING PLACEMENT OF   BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT HIM AT   561-494-2262 OR [email protected]   5. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL , PLANS SHALL SHOW   PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER,   STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES, INCLUDING   STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY   SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, METERS, AND   OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH   BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES   SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS,   CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND   MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER LINES. ALL   AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PROFILE VIEW.   DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN   VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. ADDITIONALLY,   PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED   UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,   ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION   FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.   6. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL , CUT AND CAP   UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY ABANDONED UTILITY   LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY RIGHT OF WAY.   7. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE   ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION OF WATER   METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION.   8. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE CALLOUT   DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA AND FIRE BACKFLOW   PREVENTER AS DCDA. SPECIFY LEAD FREE DESIGN ON ALL   BACKFLOWS.   9. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES   OF WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.   10. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING   APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT   SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING   SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED   LEAD-FREE DESIGN.   11. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL CLEARLY SHOW ROAD   RIGHT OF WAY.   12. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL PROVIDE SANITARY   ELEVATIONS AT MANHOLE TIE-IN.   13. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES   ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY   LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT   PARCELS.   14. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES   ARE BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL   ADDRESSES.   15. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN TRENCHING IN   IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE 50   FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF   PROPOSED TRENCH PER CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-9.       FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR   CONCERNS, THANKS.       RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT   DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 [email protected]         Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 2 Status F Date 12-04-2019 Cont ID   Sent By rrossano Date 12-04-2019 Time   Rev Time 1.00 Received By rrossano Date 12-04-2019 Time   Sent To   Notes 2019-12-04 07:26:22 REDESIGN WATER SYSTEM AS A PRIVATE SYSTEM WITH MASTER   METER.       FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR   CONCERNS, THANKS.       RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT   401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR   WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX   3366, ZIP 33402)   MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098   FAX: (561) 494-1116 MOBILE: (561) 246-9525   EMAIL: [email protected]   WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING     Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 1 Status P Date 10-07-2019 Cont ID   Sent By rrossano Date 10-07-2019 Time   Rev Time   Received By rrossano Date 10-07-2019 Time   Sent To   Notes 2019-10-07 12:11:34 1. THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF   REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY   AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND   WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE   DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK   BELOW: HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=   ~\WPB_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION   -FULL-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC0   2A97B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF   THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE   FOUND HERE: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBL   IC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS   2. CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH,   FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08, ADOPTED   SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)   CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. SEC. 90-7.   POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER SERVICE   FACILITIES OF THE CITY.   THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE   CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY   BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,   BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.   3. AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH   CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,   STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR   MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:   HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI   CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL   4. PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS   OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES,   INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND   SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES,   METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE   SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING   GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS,   ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL   INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER   LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE   PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN   VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.   PLEASE SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT   MATERIAL. ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL   EXISTING AND PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT,   INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &   TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE   RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL   UTILITY CROSSINGS.   5. CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY   ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY   RIGHT OF WAY.   6. PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE   DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB   DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION).   7. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND   PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM   AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE   PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER.   8. SHOW VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION INFORMATION   (NAVD 88 AND NGVD 29) ON ALL SHEETS.   9. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF EXISTING AND REVISED   PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED   IMPACTED AREAS.   10. PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR   PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.   11. COORDINATE WITH MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE   SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING   PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT   HIM AT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]   12. PROVIDE UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY   PERSONNEL TO PROPOSED UTILITIES INCLUDING WATER METERS.   13. PLEASE PROVIDE 10 FT. MIN. HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE   BETWEEN PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER LINES.   14. PLEASE PROVIDE INLET ELEVATIONS AT PROPOSED   MANHOLES.   15. SPECIFY WATER MAIN IN RIGHT OF WAY AS 8 IN. DIP   MATERIAL.   16. PLEASE SHOW VALVE SIZES AND LOCATIONS. LABEL CITY   POINTS OF SERVICE.   17. LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE.   18. PLEASE CLEARLY SHOW LOCATION OF MASTER METER AND   VAULT.   19. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES   OF WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.   20. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING   APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT   SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING   SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED   LEAD-FREE DESIGN.   21. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL CLEARLY SHOW ROAD   RIGHT OF WAY.   22. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL PROVIDE SANITARY   ELEVATIONS AT MANHOLE TIE-IN.   23. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN TRENCHING IN   IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE 50   FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF   PROPOSED TRENCH PER CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-9.   24. PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING AND   INCLUDE Z PERMIT NUMBER IN ALL CORRESPONDENCE.   -----------------------------   PLEASE SEE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY,   CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR CITY OF WPB UTILITIES:       BROADSTONE LAKESIDE (C-141)   PLAN IS CURRENTLY SETUP TO HAVE CITY WATER MAINS   TRAVELING THROUGHOUT PRIVATE COMMUNITY. IT NEEDS TO BE   COMPLETELY REWORKED SO THAT CITY POINT OF SERVICE IS   NEAR EDGE OF PROPERTY LINE AND MOST UTILITY EASEMENTS   ARE ELIMINATED.   NEW UTILITY PLAN SHOULD HAVE:   TWO DEDICATED ABOVE-GROUND LARGE DIAMETER METERS IN   SMALL U.E. -> CAN BE MADE TO LOOP WITH NO FIRE USE.   INDEPENDENT FIRE SYSTEM FED BY TWO DEDICATED FIRELINE   BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES -> CAN BE LOOPED. IT SHOULD BE   LOCATED ADJACENT TO DOMESTIC BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES. (ALL   BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY OUT OF UE OR   ROW)   UTILITY METERS FOR WATER SHOULD BE IN A GRASSY AREA AND   NOT IN THE STREET WITH ACCESS FOR INSTALLING METER WITH   CRANE TRUCK.   MOST OF PIPE INSIDE PROPERTY SHOULD BE PRIVATELY OWNED   & MAINTAINED.       MR. HURLEY CAN BE REACHED AT 561-494-2262 OR   [email protected]       FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR   CONCERNS, THANKS.       RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES   DEPARTMENT   DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 [email protected]     Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT Rev No 1 Status P Date 10-04-2019 Cont ID   Sent By pleduc Date 10-04-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By pleduc Date 10-04-2019 Time 16:31 Sent To   Notes 2019-10-04 16:37:13 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,   FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM   BEACH FIRE RESCUE.       THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE   DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS   ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.       THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE   PROPOSED PROJECT.       1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY   WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE   PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A   PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED   TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN   STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY   MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER   PROTECTION.       2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY   IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING   ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.       3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM   ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.   ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND   AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT   WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.       4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE   REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE   ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.       5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH   THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,   INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.       6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE   OCCUPANCY TYPE, PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,   AND WHETHER IT IS MIXED OR SEPARATED OCCUPANCY.       7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE   LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER   SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED.       8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS   DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED   ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF   FIRE PREVENTION.       ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS   DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE   BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION.       THE PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S LOCATION ARE   ACCEPTABLE.       9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER   THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY   ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM,   ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FS 61G AND   SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PLAN.       9A) PROVIDE FOR THE REQUIRED STANDPIPE SYSTEM PER NFPA   14.       10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL   BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL   DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,   EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A   PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE   SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.       11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE   SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY   DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.       ANY PROPOSED GATES SHALL HAVE A KNOX KEY SWITCH SYSTEM   THAT OPERATE GATES TO OPEN TO A WIDTH EQUAL TO A 20'   FIRE LANE.       12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT   DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.       13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING   PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH   THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.       PETER LEDUC   FIRE MARSHAL   561-804-4709   [email protected]         Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 4 Status F Date 02-27-2020 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 02-27-2020 Time 17:44 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 02-27-2020 Time 17:44 Sent To   Notes 2020-02-27 17:45:21 FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462   PROJECT: BROADSTONE LAKESIDE RPD   FEBRUARY 27, 2020   FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT Z19090014: NO COMMENTS.   REZONING TO RPD Z19090015   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:       1. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE   DISPOSITION PLAN SHEET LD-1:   ? SATISFIED. BISCHOFIA IS ON THE PROHIBITED TREE LIST   AND THE FOUR LISTED DO NOT REQUIRE MITIGATION.   ? SATISFIED. CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR MITIGATION DUE   FOR ANY TREES PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL MUST BE IN A   SEPARATE COLUMN, AND THE TOTAL PROVIDED FOR THE COLUMN.   SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR RELOCATED TREES IS NOT REQUIRED AND   MUST BE IN A SEPARATE COLUMN IF INCLUDED ON THE LIST.   ? SATISFIED. REMOVALS OF PALMS MUST INCLUDE THE   MITIGATION REQUIRED BY CATEGORY. ADONIDIA, FOXTAIL,   QUEEN PALM AND WASHINGTONIA PALM ARE ALL CATEGORY 4   REQUIRING MITIGATION OF 50 SQ FT EACH.   ? SATISFIED. INCLUDE A CHART FOR TREE MITIGATION   PROVIDED BASED ON THE PLANT LIST AND PROVIDE THE TOTAL   FOR THE SQUARE FOOTAGE.       2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE   TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR   RELOCATED. A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF LIVE OAK TREES (26)   MANY OF LARGE CANOPY SIZE ARE LISTED TO BE REMOVED, AND   THE CONDITION LISTED AS FAIR. PROVIDE THE METHOD OF   DETERMINATION OF THE CONDITION ASSESSMENT, AND THE   SOURCE OF THE DETERMINATION. STAFF IS VERY FAMILIAR   WITH THE TREES ON SITE AND WILL MEET ON SITE WITH THE   LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND TREE RELOCATION CONTRACTOR TO   ASSESS THE CONDITION OF THE TREES LISTED AS FAIR.       3. SATISFIED. SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR MINIMUM SHADE   TREE AND FLOWERING TREE REQUIREMENTS PER SECTION   94-443(C)(2)B. BASED ON OPEN SPACE AND ADD REQUIRED   TREES PER UNIT (280) TO ESTABLISH THE MINIMUM TREES   REQUIRED FOR THE SITE. OPEN SPACE REQUIRED FOR   RESIDENTIAL ZONING INCLUDES SETBACKS, PARKING,   SIDEWALKS, LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND BUILDING PERIMETER   PLANTINGS. A SEPARATE OPEN SPACE PLAN MAY BE SUBMITTED   SHOWING THE OPEN SPACE AREAS COUNTED.   CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE CORRECTED TO SHOW TOTAL   NON-BUILDING OPEN SPACE AREA AND LAKE (WATER AREA   ONLY). SHOW THE LAKE AREA AND THE LAND AREA AT THE EDGE   OF THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF LAKE THAT CANNOT HAVE   LANDSCAPING DEDUCTED FROM THE OPEN SPACE FOR   CALCULATING THE REQUIRED TREES. SHOW THE TOTAL TREES   REQUIRED BASED ON THE REMAINDER AND CALCULATE THE   SHORTAGE OF REQUIRED TREES. THIS IS SHOWN AS 615   REQUIRED AND 564 PROVIDED. THIS IS A DIFFERENCE OF 51   TREES.       INCLUDE ALL NON BUILDING AND NON LAKE AREA AS OPEN   SPACE. WHY IS THE SOUTHERN STRIP OF LAND NOT INCLUDED?           4. SATISFIED. SHOW THE REQUIRED 10 FOOT LANDSCAPE   BUFFER ADJACENT TO THE RIGHT OF WAY AND THE 5 FOOT   LANDSCAPE BUFFER PLANTINGS ALONG ALL OTHER PROPERTY   LINES WITH THE REQUIRED TREES OR NUMBER OF SUBSTITUTE   PALMS PER CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION   94-443(D). IF THE BUFFER CANNOT BE PROVIDED ALONG THE   PROPERTY LINE, A WAIVER MUST BE REQUESTED, AND   ALTERNATIVES PRESENTED TO PROVIDE COMPARABLE BUFFERING   ON THE SITE.   ALL REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFERS MUST BE SHOWN, AND THE   AREAS INDICATED THAT ARE REQUESTED TO BE WAIVED.   QUANTIFY THE LINEAR MEASUREMENT OF REQUIRED AND   PROVIDED, AND WHAT IS BEING ASKED TO BE WAIVED.       PROVIDE A SEPARATE EXHIBIT FOR CLARIFICATION.           5. SATISFIED. INDICATE THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER LOCATIONS   ON THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN. PROVIDE A COMPLETE   SITE PLAN FOR THE SITE. SHEET SP-1 DOES NOT SHOW THE   ENTIRE SITE. SHEET EPH-1 SHOWS BOTH SITES, SO THE SITE   PLAN SHOULD SHOW ALL OF THE RPD.   PROVIDE A COMPLETE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE SITE MATCHING   THE SITE PLAN. SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE SITE NEEDS TO BE   SHOWN.       6. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL CALCULATIONS FOR THE REQUIRED   TREES FOR BUFFER SEGMENTS ON A PERIMETER BUFFER   REQUIREMENT CHART INCLUDING LINEAR FOOTAGE OF ALL   PROPERTY LINE SEGMENTS.   BUFFER SEGMENT ADJACENT TO THE ROAD NEEDS TO BE LISTED   SEPARATELY, AS THIS HAS A REQUIRED 10 FOOT BUFFER.   BUFFER SEGMENTS NEED TO BE DIVIDED AND SHOWN AS VILLAGE   BLVD., WEST (ADJACENT TO CANAL), NORTH (ALL SEGMENTS),   AND EAST (ALONG I 95). SHOW TOTAL BUFFER LENGTH AND   DIVIDE BY 30, ROUND UP TO THE NEXT FULL TREE AND SHOW   THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF TREES, THE NUMBER PROVIDED, AND   THE NUMBER REQUESTED TO BE WAIVED FOR THAT SEGMENT.   THE CHART NEEDS TO BE COMPLETED WITH THE REQUIRED AND   PROVIDED BUFFER AND TREE BROKEN DOWN BY SEGMENTS.               7. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR ALL BUFFERS   ALONG VILLAGE BOULEVARD WITH ACCESS DRIVEWAYS TO SHOW   THEY DO NOT EXCEED 25% INTERRUPTION FOR VEHICULAR   ACCESS AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 94-443(B)(2).       8. SATISFIED. SUBSTITUTION OF PALMS FOR TREES REQUIRES   3:1 RATIO FOR SABAL PALMS AND MONTGOMERY PALMS. ADD UP   ALL TRUNKS AT 3:1 AND THEN DIVIDE BY 3 TO GET TREE   COUNT AND ADD ROYALS AND MEDJOOLS AS 1:1 PALMS.   RECALCULATE TREES COUNT PROVIDED.       9. SATISFIED. LIGUSTRUM DOES NOT QUALIFY AS A TREE   UNLESS PROVIDED AT 12 FOOT MINIMUM SIZE AND PLACED TO   BE ALLOWED TO GROW TO HEIGHT AND SPREAD MEETING THE   TREE DEFINITION.       10. SATISFIED. MODIFY THE PLANT LIST TO ADD COLUMNS FOR   NATIVE PLANT AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVELS TO PROVIDE   EASIER REFERENCE.       11. SATISFIED. ADD RELOCATED TREES TO THE PLANT LIST   AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE REQUIRED TREES.   LIST SPECIES AND QUANTITIES OF EACH.   LIST LIVE OAKS AND SABAL PALMS SEPARATELY.       12. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A   MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO   BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING   AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE   PERCENTAGE OF CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR THE   REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS.       13. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING   AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND   LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH   SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4).   LIST THE CALCULATIONS ON THE DATA CHART.   PROVIDE AS A LARGER 1:20 SCALE PLAN FOR REVIEW OF THE   PROVIDED AREAS.           14. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL REQUIRED CURBS ADJACENT TO   LANDSCAPE AREAS PER SECTION 94-443 (C)(5). THERE APPEAR   TO BE AREAS THAT ARE NOT CURBED. LANDSCAPE DIVIDER   STRIPS CAN HAVE CURBS INSTEAD OF WHEEL STOPS TO   INCREASE THE LANDSCAPE AREA FOR THE TREES. IF DRAINAGE   IS A CONCERN, THEY CAN BE DESIGNED TO ROUTE WATER INTO   THE LANDSCAPE AREAS.       15. SATISFIED. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE   CHART TO THE CURRENT CODE AND PROVIDE THE MINIMUM 50   POINTS BASED ON THE PLANT LIST AND ITEMS THAT QUALIFY.   SOME WORDING AND PERCENTAGES ARE NOT CORRECT.       16. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE   LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.       17. SATISFIED. THERE APPEAR TO BE CONFLICTS IN SEVERAL   LOCATIONS BETWEEN TREES AND WATER AND SEWER LINES ON   THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. ADJUST LOCATIONS OF TREES OR   UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.   FDC LOCATIONS NEED TO BE CHANGED TO AVOID TAKING SPACE   IN LANDSCAPE ISLANDS INTENDED FOR REQUIRED TREES.       THERE ARE MULTIPLE EXAMPLES OF REQUIRED TREES BEING   DISPLACED FOR FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC CONNECTIONS.   COORDINATE WITH THE ENGINEER TO RELOCATE TO ALLOW THE   REQUIRED SPACE FOR TREES TO BE AVAILABLE.   .   18. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND SCREENING FOR ALL   ABOVE GROUND UTILITY VALVES, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS, A/C   UNITS, AND FPL TRANSFORMERS.       19. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS   REQUIRED TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES AND PROVIDE A ROOT   BARRIER DETAIL.   SEE COMMENT #17 ABOVE. NON HERBICIDE HARD PLASTIC ROOT   BARRIER IS PREFERRED OVER BIO BARRIER.       20. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.   PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT   MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT   TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE   LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH   FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH   FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.   PERCENTAGE COULD NOT BE LOCATED ON SHEET LP-8.       PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED ON THE PLANT LIST   OF ADDED PLANTS.       21. SATISFIED. THE LAKE AREA EXPANSION MUST INCLUDE   LITTORAL PLANTINGS PER SECTION 94-450.   TOTAL LINEAR FOOTAGE OF THE ENTIRE LAKE BANK MUST BE   PROVIDED, AND 50 PERCENT INDICATED, THEN WHAT IS BEING   PROVIDED.   THIS NEEDS TO BE CLARIFIED ON THE PLAN AND IN THE   WAIVER.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 12/9/19:       22. SATISFIED. THERE ARE EXISTING TREES AND PALMS   WITHIN THE PROPERTY OUTSIDE OF THE AREA SHOWN ON SHEET   LD-1. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED INFORMATION AND INCLUDE THEM   ON THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN AND LIST.       23. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE MITIGATION VALUES ON SHEET   LP-1 FOR ROYAL PALM AND SABAL PALM TO CATEGORY 3 AT 100   SQUARE FEET MITIGATION CREDIT.FOR   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 1-21-20   24. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. LAKE BANK CROSS SECTIONS SHEET   C-137 NEEDS TO INCLUDE ANY MODIFICATIONS FOR LITTORAL   PLANTING AREAS, AND A CROSS SECTION DETAIL IS NEEDED   FOR THE PLANTING.   SHOW SPECIFIC PLANTING ZONES REQUIRED FOR THE PLANT   SPECIES SELECTED. A LITTORAL SHELF MAY BE REQUIRED TO   PROVIDE THE CORRECT WATER DEPTH FOR THE SELECTED   SPECIES.           25. SATISFIED. A DETAIL IS SHOWN FOR ARTIFICIAL TURF,   BUT THE AREAS PROPOSED ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE   PLAN. PER CODE THESE AREAS MUST BE COUNTED AS   IMPERVIOUS AREA.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 2-27-20:   26. HEDGE IS REQUIRED ON 3 SIDES OF ALL DUMPSTER   ENCLOSURES. ENCLOSURE ADJACENT TO THE LIFT STATION   REQUIRES A HEDGE ON THE NORTH SIDE.       CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 3 Status F Date 01-22-2020 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 01-22-2020 Time 12:54 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 01-22-2020 Time 12:54 Sent To   Notes 2020-01-22 12:54:49 FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462   PROJECT: BROADSTONE LAKESIDE RPD   JANUARY 21, 2020   FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT Z19090014: NO COMMENTS.   REZONING TO RPD Z19090015   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:       1. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE   DISPOSITION PLAN SHEET LD-1:   ? SATISFIED. BISCHOFIA IS ON THE PROHIBITED TREE LIST   AND THE FOUR LISTED DO NOT REQUIRE MITIGATION.   ? SATISFIED. CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR MITIGATION DUE   FOR ANY TREES PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL MUST BE IN A   SEPARATE COLUMN, AND THE TOTAL PROVIDED FOR THE COLUMN.   SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR RELOCATED TREES IS NOT REQUIRED AND   MUST BE IN A SEPARATE COLUMN IF INCLUDED ON THE LIST.   ? SATISFIED. REMOVALS OF PALMS MUST INCLUDE THE   MITIGATION REQUIRED BY CATEGORY. ADONIDIA, FOXTAIL,   QUEEN PALM AND WASHINGTONIA PALM ARE ALL CATEGORY 4   REQUIRING MITIGATION OF 50 SQ FT EACH.   ? SATISFIED. INCLUDE A CHART FOR TREE MITIGATION   PROVIDED BASED ON THE PLANT LIST AND PROVIDE THE TOTAL   FOR THE SQUARE FOOTAGE.       2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE   TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR   RELOCATED. A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF LIVE OAK TREES (26)   MANY OF LARGE CANOPY SIZE ARE LISTED TO BE REMOVED, AND   THE CONDITION LISTED AS FAIR. PROVIDE THE METHOD OF   DETERMINATION OF THE CONDITION ASSESSMENT, AND THE   SOURCE OF THE DETERMINATION. STAFF IS VERY FAMILIAR   WITH THE TREES ON SITE AND WILL MEET ON SITE WITH THE   LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND TREE RELOCATION CONTRACTOR TO   ASSESS THE CONDITION OF THE TREES LISTED AS FAIR.       3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR   MINIMUM SHADE TREE AND FLOWERING TREE REQUIREMENTS PER   SECTION 94-443(C)(2)B. BASED ON OPEN SPACE AND ADD   REQUIRED TREES PER UNIT (280) TO ESTABLISH THE MINIMUM   TREES REQUIRED FOR THE SITE. OPEN SPACE REQUIRED FOR   RESIDENTIAL ZONING INCLUDES SETBACKS, PARKING,   SIDEWALKS, LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND BUILDING PERIMETER   PLANTINGS. A SEPARATE OPEN SPACE PLAN MAY BE SUBMITTED   SHOWING THE OPEN SPACE AREAS COUNTED.   CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE CORRECTED TO SHOW TOTAL   NON-BUILDING OPEN SPACE AREA AND LAKE (WATER AREA   ONLY). SHOW THE LAKE AREA AND THE LAND AREA AT THE EDGE   OF THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF LAKE THAT CANNOT HAVE   LANDSCAPING DEDUCTED FROM THE OPEN SPACE FOR   CALCULATING THE REQUIRED TREES. SHOW THE TOTAL TREES   REQUIRED BASED ON THE REMAINDER AND CALCULATE THE   SHORTAGE OF REQUIRED TREES. THIS IS SHOWN AS 615   REQUIRED AND 564 PROVIDED. THIS IS A DIFFERENCE OF 51   TREES.       INCLUDE ALL NON BUILDING AND NON LAKE AREA AS OPEN   SPACE. WHY IS THE SOUTHERN STRIP OF LAND NOT INCLUDED?           4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW THE REQUIRED 10 FOOT   LANDSCAPE BUFFER ADJACENT TO THE RIGHT OF WAY AND THE 5   FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER PLANTINGS ALONG ALL OTHER   PROPERTY LINES WITH THE REQUIRED TREES OR NUMBER OF   SUBSTITUTE PALMS PER CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS OF   SECTION 94-443(D). IF THE BUFFER CANNOT BE PROVIDED   ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, A WAIVER MUST BE REQUESTED,   AND ALTERNATIVES PRESENTED TO PROVIDE COMPARABLE   BUFFERING ON THE SITE.   ALL REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFERS MUST BE SHOWN, AND THE   AREAS INDICATED THAT ARE REQUESTED TO BE WAIVED.   QUANTIFY THE LINEAR MEASUREMENT OF REQUIRED AND   PROVIDED, AND WHAT IS BEING ASKED TO BE WAIVED.       PROVIDE A SEPARATE EXHIBIT FOR CLARIFICATION.           5. SATISFIED. INDICATE THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER LOCATIONS   ON THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN. PROVIDE A COMPLETE   SITE PLAN FOR THE SITE. SHEET SP-1 DOES NOT SHOW THE   ENTIRE SITE. SHEET EPH-1 SHOWS BOTH SITES, SO THE SITE   PLAN SHOULD SHOW ALL OF THE RPD.   PROVIDE A COMPLETE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE SITE MATCHING   THE SITE PLAN. SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE SITE NEEDS TO BE   SHOWN.       6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW ALL CALCULATIONS FOR THE   REQUIRED TREES FOR BUFFER SEGMENTS ON A PERIMETER   BUFFER REQUIREMENT CHART INCLUDING LINEAR FOOTAGE OF   ALL PROPERTY LINE SEGMENTS.   BUFFER SEGMENT ADJACENT TO THE ROAD NEEDS TO BE LISTED   SEPARATELY, AS THIS HAS A REQUIRED 10 FOOT BUFFER.   BUFFER SEGMENTS NEED TO BE DIVIDED AND SHOWN AS VILLAGE   BLVD., WEST (ADJACENT TO CANAL), NORTH (ALL SEGMENTS),   AND EAST (ALONG I 95). SHOW TOTAL BUFFER LENGTH AND   DIVIDE BY 30, ROUND UP TO THE NEXT FULL TREE AND SHOW   THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF TREES, THE NUMBER PROVIDED, AND   THE NUMBER REQUESTED TO BE WAIVED FOR THAT SEGMENT.   THE CHART NEEDS TO BE COMPLETED WITH THE REQUIRED AND   PROVIDED BUFFER AND TREE BROKEN DOWN BY SEGMENTS.               7. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR ALL BUFFERS   ALONG VILLAGE BOULEVARD WITH ACCESS DRIVEWAYS TO SHOW   THEY DO NOT EXCEED 25% INTERRUPTION FOR VEHICULAR   ACCESS AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 94-443(B)(2).       8. SATISFIED. SUBSTITUTION OF PALMS FOR TREES REQUIRES   3:1 RATIO FOR SABAL PALMS AND MONTGOMERY PALMS. ADD UP   ALL TRUNKS AT 3:1 AND THEN DIVIDE BY 3 TO GET TREE   COUNT AND ADD ROYALS AND MEDJOOLS AS 1:1 PALMS.   RECALCULATE TREES COUNT PROVIDED.       9. SATISFIED. LIGUSTRUM DOES NOT QUALIFY AS A TREE   UNLESS PROVIDED AT 12 FOOT MINIMUM SIZE AND PLACED TO   BE ALLOWED TO GROW TO HEIGHT AND SPREAD MEETING THE   TREE DEFINITION.       10. SATISFIED. MODIFY THE PLANT LIST TO ADD COLUMNS FOR   NATIVE PLANT AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVELS TO PROVIDE   EASIER REFERENCE.       11. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ADD RELOCATED TREES TO THE   PLANT LIST AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE REQUIRED TREES.   LIST SPECIES AND QUANTITIES OF EACH.   LIST LIVE OAKS AND SABAL PALMS SEPARATELY.       12. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A   MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO   BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING   AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE   PERCENTAGE OF CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR THE   REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS.       13. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING   AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND   LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH   SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4).   LIST THE CALCULATIONS ON THE DATA CHART.   PROVIDE AS A LARGER 1:20 SCALE PLAN FOR REVIEW OF THE   PROVIDED AREAS.           14. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL REQUIRED CURBS ADJACENT TO   LANDSCAPE AREAS PER SECTION 94-443 (C)(5). THERE APPEAR   TO BE AREAS THAT ARE NOT CURBED. LANDSCAPE DIVIDER   STRIPS CAN HAVE CURBS INSTEAD OF WHEEL STOPS TO   INCREASE THE LANDSCAPE AREA FOR THE TREES. IF DRAINAGE   IS A CONCERN, THEY CAN BE DESIGNED TO ROUTE WATER INTO   THE LANDSCAPE AREAS.       15. SATISFIED. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE   CHART TO THE CURRENT CODE AND PROVIDE THE MINIMUM 50   POINTS BASED ON THE PLANT LIST AND ITEMS THAT QUALIFY.   SOME WORDING AND PERCENTAGES ARE NOT CORRECT.       16. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE   LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.       17. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THERE APPEAR TO BE CONFLICTS   IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS BETWEEN TREES AND WATER AND SEWER   LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. ADJUST LOCATIONS OF TREES   OR UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.   FDC LOCATIONS NEED TO BE CHANGED TO AVOID TAKING SPACE   IN LANDSCAPE ISLANDS INTENDED FOR REQUIRED TREES.       THERE ARE MULTIPLE EXAMPLES OF REQUIRED TREES BEING   DISPLACED FOR FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC CONNECTIONS.   COORDINATE WITH THE ENGINEER TO RELOCATE TO ALLOW THE   REQUIRED SPACE FOR TREES TO BE AVAILABLE.   .   18. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND SCREENING FOR ALL   ABOVE GROUND UTILITY VALVES, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS, A/C   UNITS, AND FPL TRANSFORMERS.       19. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS   REQUIRED TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES AND PROVIDE A ROOT   BARRIER DETAIL.   SEE COMMENT #17 ABOVE. NON HERBICIDE HARD PLASTIC ROOT   BARRIER IS PREFERRED OVER BIO BARRIER.       20. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION   94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF   PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT   TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE   LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH   FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH   FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.   PERCENTAGE COULD NOT BE LOCATED ON SHEET LP-8.       PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED ON THE PLANT LIST   OF ADDED PLANTS.       21. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE LAKE AREA EXPANSION MUST   INCLUDE LITTORAL PLANTINGS PER SECTION 94-450.   TOTAL LINEAR FOOTAGE OF THE ENTIRE LAKE BANK MUST BE   PROVIDED, AND 50 PERCENT INDICATED, THEN WHAT IS BEING   PROVIDED.   THIS NEEDS TO BE CLARIFIED ON THE PLAN AND IN THE   WAIVER.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 12/9/19:       22. SATISFIED. THERE ARE EXISTING TREES AND PALMS   WITHIN THE PROPERTY OUTSIDE OF THE AREA SHOWN ON SHEET   LD-1. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED INFORMATION AND INCLUDE THEM   ON THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN AND LIST.       23. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE MITIGATION VALUES ON SHEET   LP-1 FOR ROYAL PALM AND SABAL PALM TO CATEGORY 3 AT 100   SQUARE FEET MITIGATION CREDIT.FOR   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 1-21-20   24. LAKE BANK CROSS SECTIONS SHEET C-137 NEEDS TO   INCLUDE ANY MODIFICATIONS FOR LITTORAL PLANTING AREAS,   AND A CROSS SECTION DETAIL IS NEEDED FOR THE PLANTING.       25. A DETAIL IS SHOWN FOR ARTIFICIAL TURF, BUT THE   AREAS PROPOSED ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. PER   CODE THESE AREAS MUST BE COUNTED AS IMPERVIOUS AREA.       CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 2 Status F Date 12-09-2019 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 12-09-2019 Time 16:50 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 12-09-2019 Time 16:50 Sent To   Notes 2019-12-09 16:51:21 FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462   PROJECT: BROADSTONE LAKESIDE RPD   DECEMBER 9, 2019   FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT Z19090014: NO COMMENTS.   REZONING TO RPD Z19090015   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:       1. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE   DISPOSITION PLAN SHEET LD-1:   ? SATISFIED. BISCHOFIA IS ON THE PROHIBITED TREE LIST   AND THE FOUR LISTED DO NOT REQUIRE MITIGATION.   ? SATISFIED. CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR MITIGATION DUE   FOR ANY TREES PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL MUST BE IN A   SEPARATE COLUMN, AND THE TOTAL PROVIDED FOR THE COLUMN.   SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR RELOCATED TREES IS NOT REQUIRED AND   MUST BE IN A SEPARATE COLUMN IF INCLUDED ON THE LIST.   ? SATISFIED. REMOVALS OF PALMS MUST INCLUDE THE   MITIGATION REQUIRED BY CATEGORY. ADONIDIA, FOXTAIL,   QUEEN PALM AND WASHINGTONIA PALM ARE ALL CATEGORY 4   REQUIRING MITIGATION OF 50 SQ FT EACH.   ? SATISFIED. INCLUDE A CHART FOR TREE MITIGATION   PROVIDED BASED ON THE PLANT LIST AND PROVIDE THE TOTAL   FOR THE SQUARE FOOTAGE.       2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE   TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR   RELOCATED. A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF LIVE OAK TREES (26)   MANY OF LARGE CANOPY SIZE ARE LISTED TO BE REMOVED, AND   THE CONDITION LISTED AS FAIR. PROVIDE THE METHOD OF   DETERMINATION OF THE CONDITION ASSESSMENT, AND THE   SOURCE OF THE DETERMINATION. STAFF IS VERY FAMILIAR   WITH THE TREES ON SITE AND WILL MEET ON SITE WITH THE   LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND TREE RELOCATION CONTRACTOR TO   ASSESS THE CONDITION OF THE TREES LISTED AS FAIR.       3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR   MINIMUM SHADE TREE AND FLOWERING TREE REQUIREMENTS PER   SECTION 94-443(C)(2)B. BASED ON OPEN SPACE AND ADD   REQUIRED TREES PER UNIT (280) TO ESTABLISH THE MINIMUM   TREES REQUIRED FOR THE SITE. OPEN SPACE REQUIRED FOR   RESIDENTIAL ZONING INCLUDES SETBACKS, PARKING,   SIDEWALKS, LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND BUILDING PERIMETER   PLANTINGS. A SEPARATE OPEN SPACE PLAN MAY BE SUBMITTED   SHOWING THE OPEN SPACE AREAS COUNTED.   CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE CORRECTED TO SHOW TOTAL   NON-BUILDING OPEN SPACE AREA AND LAKE (WATER AREA   ONLY). SHOW THE LAKE AREA AND THE LAND AREA AT THE EDGE   OF THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF LAKE THAT CANNOT HAVE   LANDSCAPING DEDUCTED FROM THE OPEN SPACE FOR   CALCULATING THE REQUIRED TREES. SHOW THE TOTAL TREES   REQUIRED BASED ON THE REMAINDER AND CALCULATE THE   SHORTAGE OF REQUIRED TREES. THIS IS SHOWN AS 615   REQUIRED AND 564 PROVIDED. THIS IS A DIFFERENCE OF 51   TREES.           4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW THE REQUIRED 10 FOOT   LANDSCAPE BUFFER ADJACENT TO THE RIGHT OF WAY AND THE 5   FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER PLANTINGS ALONG ALL OTHER   PROPERTY LINES WITH THE REQUIRED TREES OR NUMBER OF   SUBSTITUTE PALMS PER CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS OF   SECTION 94-443(D). IF THE BUFFER CANNOT BE PROVIDED   ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, A WAIVER MUST BE REQUESTED,   AND ALTERNATIVES PRESENTED TO PROVIDE COMPARABLE   BUFFERING ON THE SITE.   ALL REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFERS MUST BE SHOWN, AND THE   AREAS INDICATED THAT ARE REQUESTED TO BE WAIVED.   QUANTIFY THE LINEAR MEASUREMENT OF REQUIRED AND   PROVIDED, AND WHAT IS BEING ASKED TO BE WAIVED.       5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. INDICATE THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER   LOCATIONS ON THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN. PROVIDE   A COMPLETE SITE PLAN FOR THE SITE. SHEET SP-1 DOES NOT   SHOW THE ENTIRE SITE. SHEET EPH-1 SHOWS BOTH SITES, SO   THE SITE PLAN SHOULD SHOW ALL OF THE RPD.   PROVIDE A COMPLETE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE SITE MATCHING   THE SITE PLAN. SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE SITE NEEDS TO BE   SHOWN.       6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW ALL CALCULATIONS FOR THE   REQUIRED TREES FOR BUFFER SEGMENTS ON A PERIMETER   BUFFER REQUIREMENT CHART INCLUDING LINEAR FOOTAGE OF   ALL PROPERTY LINE SEGMENTS.   BUFFER SEGMENT ADJACENT TO THE ROAD NEEDS TO BE LISTED   SEPARATELY, AS THIS HAS A REQUIRED 10 FOOT BUFFER.   BUFFER SEGMENTS NEED TO BE DIVIDED AND SHOWN AS VILLAGE   BLVD., WEST (ADJACENT TO CANAL), NORTH (ALL SEGMENTS),   AND EAST (ALONG I 95). SHOW TOTAL BUFFER LENGTH AND   DIVIDE BY 30, ROUND UP TO THE NEXT FULL TREE AND SHOW   THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF TREES, THE NUMBER PROVIDED, AND   THE NUMBER REQUESTED TO BE WAIVED FOR THAT SEGMENT.           7. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR ALL BUFFERS   ALONG VILLAGE BOULEVARD WITH ACCESS DRIVEWAYS TO SHOW   THEY DO NOT EXCEED 25% INTERRUPTION FOR VEHICULAR   ACCESS AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 94-443(B)(2).       8. SATISFIED. SUBSTITUTION OF PALMS FOR TREES REQUIRES   3:1 RATIO FOR SABAL PALMS AND MONTGOMERY PALMS. ADD UP   ALL TRUNKS AT 3:1 AND THEN DIVIDE BY 3 TO GET TREE   COUNT AND ADD ROYALS AND MEDJOOLS AS 1:1 PALMS.   RECALCULATE TREES COUNT PROVIDED.       9. SATISFIED. LIGUSTRUM DOES NOT QUALIFY AS A TREE   UNLESS PROVIDED AT 12 FOOT MINIMUM SIZE AND PLACED TO   BE ALLOWED TO GROW TO HEIGHT AND SPREAD MEETING THE   TREE DEFINITION.       10. SATISFIED. MODIFY THE PLANT LIST TO ADD COLUMNS FOR   NATIVE PLANT AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVELS TO PROVIDE   EASIER REFERENCE.       11. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ADD RELOCATED TREES TO THE   PLANT LIST AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE REQUIRED TREES.   LIST SPECIES AND QUANTITIES OF EACH.       12. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A   MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO   BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING   AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE   PERCENTAGE OF CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR THE   REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS.       13. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE   PARKING AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS   AND LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE   WITH SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4).   LIST THE CALCULATIONS ON THE DATA CHART.   PROVIDE AS A LARGER 1:20 SCALE PLAN FOR REVIEW OF THE   PROVIDED AREAS.           14. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL REQUIRED CURBS ADJACENT TO   LANDSCAPE AREAS PER SECTION 94-443 (C)(5). THERE APPEAR   TO BE AREAS THAT ARE NOT CURBED. LANDSCAPE DIVIDER   STRIPS CAN HAVE CURBS INSTEAD OF WHEEL STOPS TO   INCREASE THE LANDSCAPE AREA FOR THE TREES. IF DRAINAGE   IS A CONCERN, THEY CAN BE DESIGNED TO ROUTE WATER INTO   THE LANDSCAPE AREAS.       15. SATISFIED. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE   CHART TO THE CURRENT CODE AND PROVIDE THE MINIMUM 50   POINTS BASED ON THE PLANT LIST AND ITEMS THAT QUALIFY.   SOME WORDING AND PERCENTAGES ARE NOT CORRECT.       16. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE   LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.       17. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THERE APPEAR TO BE CONFLICTS   IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS BETWEEN TREES AND WATER AND SEWER   LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. ADJUST LOCATIONS OF TREES   OR UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.   FDC LOCATIONS NEED TO BE CHANGED TO AVOID TAKING SPACE   IN LANDSCAPE ISLANDS INTENDED FOR REQUIRED TREES.   .   18. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND SCREENING FOR ALL   ABOVE GROUND UTILITY VALVES, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS, A/C   UNITS, AND FPL TRANSFORMERS.       19. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT   BARRIERS REQUIRED TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES AND PROVIDE   A ROOT BARRIER DETAIL.   SEE COMMENT #17 ABOVE. NON HERBICIDE HARD PLASTIC ROOT   BARRIER IS PREFERRED OVER BIO BARRIER.       20. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION   94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF   PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT   TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE   LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH   FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH   FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.   PERCENTAGE COULD NOT BE LOCATED ON SHEET LP-8.       21. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE LAKE AREA EXPANSION MUST   INCLUDE LITTORAL PLANTINGS PER SECTION 94-450.   TOTAL LINEAR FOOTAGE OF THE ENTIRE LAKE BANK MUST BE   PROVIDED, AND 50 PERCENT INDICATED, THEN WHAT IS BEING   PROVIDED.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 12/9/19:       22. THERE ARE EXISTING TREES AND PALMS WITHIN THE   PROPERTY OUTSIDE OF THE AREA SHOWN ON SHEET LD-1.   PROVIDE THE REQUIRED INFORMATION AND INCLUDE THEM ON   THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN AND LIST.       23. CORRECT THE MITIGATION VALUES ON SHEET LP-1 FOR   ROYAL PALM AND SABAL PALM TO CATEGORY 3 AT 100 SQUARE   FEET MITIGATION CREDIT.FOR       CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-09-2019 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 10-09-2019 Time 16:13 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 10-09-2019 Time 16:13 Sent To   Notes 2019-10-09 16:15:55 FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462   PROJECT: BROADSTONE LAKESIDE RPD   OCTOBER 9, 2019   FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT Z19090014: NO COMMENTS.   REZONING TO RPD Z19090015   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:       1. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE   DISPOSITION PLAN SHEET LD-1:   ? BISCHOFIA IS ON THE PROHIBITED TREE LIST AND THE FOUR   LISTED DO NOT REQUIRE MITIGATION.   ? CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR MITIGATION DUE FOR ANY   TREES PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL MUST BE IN A SEPARATE   COLUMN, AND THE TOTAL PROVIDED FOR THE COLUMN. SQUARE   FOOTAGE FOR RELOCATED TREES IS NOT REQUIRED AND MUST BE   IN A SEPARATE COLUMN IF INCLUDED ON THE LIST.   ? REMOVALS OF PALMS MUST INCLUDE THE MITIGATION   REQUIRED BY CATEGORY. ADONIDIA, FOXTAIL, QUEEN PALM AND   WASHINGTONIA PALM ARE ALL CATEGORY 4 REQUIRING   MITIGATION OF 50 SQ FT EACH.   ? INCLUDE A CHART FOR TREE MITIGATION PROVIDED BASED ON   THE PLANT LIST AND PROVIDE THE TOTAL FOR THE SQUARE   FOOTAGE.       2. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES IN GOOD   CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. A   SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF LIVE OAK TREES (26) MANY OF LARGE   CANOPY SIZE ARE LISTED TO BE REMOVED, AND THE CONDITION   LISTED AS FAIR. PROVIDE THE METHOD OF DETERMINATION OF   THE CONDITION ASSESSMENT, AND THE SOURCE OF THE   DETERMINATION. STAFF IS VERY FAMILIAR WITH THE TREES ON   SITE AND WILL MEET ON SITE WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT   AND TREE RELOCATION CONTRACTOR TO ASSESS THE CONDITION   OF THE TREES LISTED AS FAIR.       3. SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR MINIMUM SHADE TREE AND   FLOWERING TREE REQUIREMENTS PER SECTION 94-443(C)(2)B.   BASED ON OPEN SPACE AND ADD REQUIRED TREES PER UNIT   (280) TO ESTABLISH THE MINIMUM TREES REQUIRED FOR THE   SITE. OPEN SPACE REQUIRED FOR RESIDENTIAL ZONING   INCLUDES SETBACKS, PARKING, SIDEWALKS, LANDSCAPE   ISLANDS AND BUILDING PERIMETER PLANTINGS. A SEPARATE   OPEN SPACE PLAN MAY BE SUBMITTED SHOWING THE OPEN SPACE   AREAS COUNTED.           4. SHOW THE REQUIRED 10 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ADJACENT   TO THE RIGHT OF WAY AND THE 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER   PLANTINGS ALONG ALL OTHER PROPERTY LINES WITH THE   REQUIRED TREES OR NUMBER OF SUBSTITUTE PALMS PER   CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(D). IF THE   BUFFER CANNOT BE PROVIDED ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, A   WAIVER MUST BE REQUESTED, AND ALTERNATIVES PRESENTED TO   PROVIDE COMPARABLE BUFFERING ON THE SITE.       5. INDICATE THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER LOCATIONS ON THE SITE   PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN.       6. SHOW ALL CALCULATIONS FOR THE REQUIRED TREES FOR   BUFFER SEGMENTS ON A PERIMETER BUFFER REQUIREMENT CHART   INCLUDING LINEAR FOOTAGE OF ALL PROPERTY LINE SEGMENTS.   BUFFER SEGMENT ADJACENT TO THE ROAD NEEDS TO BE LISTED   SEPARATELY, AS THIS HAS A REQUIRED 10 FOOT BUFFER.       7. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR ALL BUFFERS ALONG VILLAGE   BOULEVARD WITH ACCESS DRIVEWAYS TO SHOW THEY DO NOT   EXCEED 25% INTERRUPTION FOR VEHICULAR ACCESS AS   REQUIRED BY SECTION 94-443(B)(2).       8. SUBSTITUTION OF PALMS FOR TREES REQUIRES 3:1 RATIO   FOR SABAL PALMS AND MONTGOMERY PALMS. ADD UP ALL TRUNKS   AT 3:1 AND THEN DIVIDE BY 3 TO GET TREE COUNT AND ADD   ROYALS AND MEDJOOLS AS 1:1 PALMS. RECALCULATE TREES   COUNT PROVIDED.       9. LIGUSTRUM DOES NOT QUALIFY AS A TREE UNLESS PROVIDED   AT 12 FOOT MINIMUM SIZE AND PLACED TO BE ALLOWED TO   GROW TO HEIGHT AND SPREAD MEETING THE TREE DEFINITION.       10. MODIFY THE PLANT LIST TO ADD COLUMNS FOR NATIVE   PLANT AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVELS TO PROVIDE EASIER   REFERENCE.       11. ADD RELOCATED TREES TO THE PLANT LIST AND COUNT   THEM TOWARD THE REQUIRED TREES.       12. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A MINIMUM OF 75   PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED   WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING AREA SHALL   BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. SHOW THE PERCENTAGE OF   CATEGORY 1 TREES PROVIDED FOR THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE   AREAS.       13. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING AREA SURFACE   CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND LANDSCAPE AREAS   PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 94-443   (C)(3) AND (4).   LIST THE CALCULATIONS ON THE DATA CHART.       14. SHOW ALL REQUIRED CURBS ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPE AREAS   PER SECTION 94-443 (C)(5). THERE APPEAR TO BE AREAS   THAT ARE NOT CURBED. LANDSCAPE DIVIDER STRIPS CAN HAVE   CURBS INSTEAD OF WHEEL STOPS TO INCREASE THE LANDSCAPE   AREA FOR THE TREES. IF DRAINAGE IS A CONCERN, THEY CAN   BE DESIGNED TO ROUTE WATER INTO THE LANDSCAPE AREAS.       15. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE CHART TO THE   CURRENT CODE AND PROVIDE THE MINIMUM 50 POINTS BASED ON   THE PLANT LIST AND ITEMS THAT QUALIFY. SOME WORDING AND   PERCENTAGES ARE NOT CORRECT.       16. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN   TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.       17. THERE APPEAR TO BE CONFLICTS IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS   BETWEEN TREES AND WATER AND SEWER LINES ON THE   LANDSCAPE PLAN. ADJUST LOCATIONS OF TREES OR UTILITY   LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.   .   18. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND SCREENING FOR ALL ABOVE   GROUND UTILITY VALVES, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS, A/C UNITS,   AND FPL TRANSFORMERS.       19. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS REQUIRED TO   PROTECT UTILITY LINES AND PROVIDE A ROOT BARRIER   DETAIL.       20. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT   SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL   ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT   SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF   SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA   WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA   LANDSCAPES.       21. THE LAKE AREA EXPANSION MUST INCLUDE LITTORAL   PLANTINGS PER SECTION 94-450.       CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.     Review Stop PARK PARKING Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time   Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop POLICE POLICE Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time   Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS Rev No 3 Status   Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS Rev No 2 Status F Date 12-05-2019 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 12-05-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date 12-05-2019 Time   Sent To   Notes 2019-12-05 07:40:19 REGARDING THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE:   PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAILED DRAWING OF THE DUMPSTER   ENCLOSURE INDICATING ITS COMPLIANCE TO THE LATEST   REVISION RELEASED, JUNE 2019.       REGARDING THE BULK ENCLOSURE:   ALSO, PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILED DRAWING ON THE BULK   ENCLOSURE. PEASE NOTE EACH ENCLOSURE DOOR SHALL BE   EQUIPPED WITH A PIN TO HELP SECURE THE DOOR WHEN   OPENED. A MIN. 3-IN DEEP PIN HOLE NEEDED IN THE ASPHALT   FOR EACH DOOR TO HELP SECURE THE DOORS WHEN FULLY OPEN   AT A 90+ DEG. ANGLE.       MATT HEJAZI   DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS   [email protected]   561-822-2045     Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date 10-08-2019 Time   Rev Time   Received By   Date 10-08-2019 Time   Sent To   Notes 2019-10-08 15:06:28     - FOR A FREESTANDING SITE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, THE   ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST REVISION OF CITY   OF WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE   ENCLOSURE STANDARD, CG-8.   - PLEASE PROVIDE A DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK   ITEM PICK UP           MATT HEJAZI   DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS   [email protected]   561-822-2045     Review Stop STORM STORMWATER Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop STORM STORMWATER Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-08-2019 Cont ID   Sent By tward Date 10-08-2019 Time 16:51 Rev Time   Received By tward Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2019-10-08 16:52:40 THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL   DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION   PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE   ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT   APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT   APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT   HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR   MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS       THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE   PLAN APPROVAL:   1. MIN. FFE IS TWO FEET ABOVE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION FOR   STRUCTURES WITHIN SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS.       2. SHOW THE CHURCH'S STORMWATER OUTFALL PIPE (AND   EASEMENT?) ON THE PLANS.       3. SHOW AND LABEL PERIMETER BERM ALONG THE PROPERTY   LINES. PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE BERM.       4. ADD SPOT GRADES AROUND THE BUILDINGS AND FOR THE   SIDEWALKS BETWEEN THE BUILDINGS.       5. CONSIDER REDUCING THE LENGTH OF THE PARKING SPACES,   PROVIDE TWO FEET OF OVERHANG AND REPLACING THE WHEEL   STOPS WITH CURBS.       6. ON SECTION A-A (SHEET C-127), PROVIDE A 6 INCH DEEP   SWALE ALONG THE BACK OF SIDEWALK WITH SLOPES 4:1 OR   FLATTER.       7. FLOATING TURBIDITY BARRIER WILL BE NEEDED IN THE   LAKE TO CONTROL TURBIDITY DURING LAKE EXCAVATION.       8. IDENTIFY WHERE THE EXISTING POND/WETLAND WILL BE   RELOCATED TO WHEN THE LAKE IS EXPANDED.       9. IDENTIFY WHO WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE 20' LAKE   MAINTENANCE EASEMENT.       10. ON SHEET C-121, THE GRADING PLAN SHOWS SPOT GRADES   OF 14.65 ON THE DRIVEWAY AND FLOW ARROWS POINTING   TOWARD ELEVATION 15.00.       11. NUMBER THE DRAINAGE STRUCTURES FOR EASE OF   REFERENCE. IDENTIFY THE CONTROL STRUCTURE.       12. POLLUTANT RETARDANT BAFFLES (PRB'S) WILL BE NEEDED   FOR ALL STRUCTURES CONNECTED TO EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.       12. IT APPEARS THERE ARE CLEANOUTS AT ALL OF THE   SANITARY SEWER LATERAL WYE CONNECTIONS TO THE SEWER   MAIN.       13. SHOW MILL AND RESURFACE LIMITS ON VILLAGE BLVD FOR   THE UTILITY TRENCH CUTS.           THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO   ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING   BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.       1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY   BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.   THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS   CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE   ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS       2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED   WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.       3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP PRIOR TO STARTING   CONSTRUCTION.       TRACY WARD, PE   SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT   561-494-1120   [email protected]     Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time   Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 4 Status F Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date 02-26-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2020-02-26 13:39:05 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS COMMENTS:   1. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER.       SITE PLAN COMMENTS:   2. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) IS REQUIRED TO BE   CONSISTENT WITH ALL ELEMENTS OF THE CITY'S   COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. PER THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN   TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT, CONSTRUCT A 12-FOOT SIDEWALK ON   VILLAGE BOULEVARD ALONG SITE FRONTAGE. THE COST   ESTIMATE FOR THE PROPOSED IN-LIEU PAYMENT DOES NOT   APPEAR TO INCLUDE DEMOLITION, MOT, MOBILIZATION,   STABILIZATION AND UTILITY ADJUSTMENT WHICH MAY BE   ESSENTIAL TO THE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT.   3. THE CITY DOES NOT SUPPORT THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT-TURN   LANE AT THE SITE DRIVEWAY BECAUSE THIS WOULD FURTHER   ENCOURAGE HIGHER VEHICULAR SPEED ON VILLAGE BOULEVARD.   4. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS EXPECTED TO INCREASE   TRAFFIC AT THE SITE DRIVEWAYS BY MORE THAN 20 TIMES   WHICH WILL INCREASE CONFLICT WITH EXISTING TRAFFIC ON   VILLAGE BOULEVARD. PLEASE PROPOSE MITIGATIONS SUCH AS   ROUNDABOUTS AND MEDIAN CLOSURE TO MITIGATE FOR THE   INCREASED CONFLICT AND PROVIDE SAFER PEDESTRIAN ACCESS   TO THE PROPERTY.       SHING TSOI   CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT   561-494-1141   [email protected]   (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS) Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 3 Status F Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date 01-17-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2020-01-17 17:02:01 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS COMMENTS:   1. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER.           SITE PLAN COMMENTS:   2. INCLUDE IN THE CIVIL PLAN THE DIAGONAL HATCHING ON   THE PORTION OF INBOUND LANE NOT NEEDED BY PASSENGER   CARS AT THE SOUTHERN ENTRANCE.   3. OPEN UP THE 8-FOOT WATERFRONT WALKWAY AND OVERLOOK   AREAS FOR PUBLIC USE.   4. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) IS REQUIRED TO BE   CONSISTENT WITH ALL ELEMENTS OF THE CITY?S   COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. PER THE CITY?S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN   TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT, CONSTRUCT A 12-FOOT SIDEWALK ON   VILLAGE BOULEVARD ALONG SITE FRONTAGE.           CONDITIONS:   1. THE FLU AMENDMENT WILL BE VOLUNTARILY RESTRICTED TO   A MAXIMUM OF 30.5 DWELLING UNIT PER ACRE PER THE FLU   AMENDMENT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS OR AS REVISED BASED ON THE   REVISED FLU AMENDMENT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS.   2. AS A MITIGATION TO DECREASED SAFETY ASSOCIATED WITH   INCREASED TRAFFIC AND CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY?S   COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, PROVIDE TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES ON   VILLAGE BOULEVARD TO REDUCE VEHICULAR TRAVEL SPEED AND   IMPROVE SAFETY ON VILLAGE BOULEVARD.   3. AS A MITIGATION TO INCREASED TRAFFIC AND CONSISTENT   WITH THE CITY?S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, IMPLEMENT   TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS INCLUDING   PROVIDING COMMUNITY SHUTTLE SERVICE.           SHING TSOI   CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT   561-494-1141   [email protected]   (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS) Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 2 Status F Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date 11-27-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2019-11-27 17:08:46 FLU AMENDMENT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS COMMENTS:   1. IN TABLE 6, SOME OF THE YEAR 2019 TRAFFIC VOLUMES DO   NOT APPEAR TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE VOLUMES INCLUDED   IN THE APPENDIX, E.G. VOLUMES ON VILLAGE BOULEVARD   BETWEEN CUMBERLAND DRIVE AND SHILOH DRIVE. PLEASE   VERIFY AND REVISE.   2. CONSISTENT WITH THE FLU AMENDMENT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS,   THE PROPOSED FLU AMENDMENT SHALL BE LIMITED IN   INTENSITIES WHICH WOULD NOT CAUSE SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON   45TH STREET UNLESS THE IMPROVEMENT TO WIDEN 45TH STREET   BETWEEN VILLAGE BOULEVARD AND I-95 FROM 6 LANES TO 8   LANES IS IN PLACE OR IS INCLUDED IN THE PALM BEACH   TPA?S LRTP COST-FEASIBLE PLAN, 5-YEAR TRANSPORTATION   IMPROVEMENT PLAN OR FDOT?S 5-YEAR WORK PROGRAM.   TRAFFIC ANALYSIS COMMENTS:   3. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER.   4. IN TABLE 3A, SOME OF THE YEAR 2019 TRAFFIC VOLUMES   DO NOT APPEAR TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE VOLUMES   INCLUDED IN THE APPENDIX, E.G. VOLUMES ON VILLAGE   BOULEVARD BETWEEN CUMBERLAND DRIVE AND SHILOH DRIVE.   PLEASE VERIFY AND REVISE.   5. PLEASE USE HCM 6TH METHODOLOGY INSTEAD OF HCM 2000   METHODOLOGY IN THE SYNCHRO ANALYSIS.   6. PLEASE VERIFY THE CONFIGURATIONS AT SOME   INTERSECTIONS, E.G. VILLAGE BOULEVARD/COMMUNITY DRIVE   IS MISSING A RIGHT-TURN OVERLAP IN THE SYNCHRO   ANALYSIS, THE COORDINATION MODE (FREE OR COORDINATED)   AND CYCLE LENGTHS (IF COORDINATED) AT VILLAGE   BOULEVARD/SHILOH DRIVE AND VILLAGE BOULEVARD/COMMUNITY   DRIVE. PLEASE ATTACH SIGNAL TIMING SHEETS.   7. PER CITY CODE SECTION 94-32(A), A PLANNED   DEVELOPMENT (PD) IS REQUIRED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL   ELEMENTS OF THE CITY?S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE CITY?S   COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT POLICY   2.1.1(A) ADOPTS A VEHICULAR LOS E STANDARD ON CITY   STREETS. WHILE THE COST OF MITIGATING TRANSPORTATION   DEFICIENT WITHOUT THE PROJECT TRAFFIC UNDER REVIEW IS   NOT OBLIGED BY THE DEVELOPMENT PER FLORIDA STATUTES   163.3180, THE F.S. DOES NOT EXEMPT THE DEVELOPMENT FROM   MITIGATING THE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT GENERATED FROM THE   DEVELOPMENT, NOR DOES IT EXEMPT THE DEVELOPMENT FROM   MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF CITY?S CODE OF ORDINANCE.   PLEASE PROPOSE MITIGATION MEASURES, OR THE PROPOSED   DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE LIMITED IN INTENSITIES WHICH WOULD   NOT CAUSE SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON 45TH STREET UNLESS THE   IMPROVEMENT TO WIDEN 45TH STREET BETWEEN VILLAGE   BOULEVARD AND I-95 FROM 6 LANES TO 8 LANES IS IN PLACE   OR IS INCLUDED IN THE PALM BEACH TPA?S 5-YEAR   TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PLAN OR FDOT?S 5-YEAR WORK   PROGRAM.   8. PLEASE CONSIDER MITIGATION MEASURES SUCH AS   ENCOURAGING PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE MODES ON VILLAGE   BOULEVARD BY PROVIDING MULTI-USE TRAILS, REDUCING   VEHICULAR TRAVEL SPEED AND IMPROVING SAFETY ON VILLAGE   BOULEVARD, AND IMPLEMENTATION OF TRANSPORTATION DEMAND   MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS, E.G. COMMUNITY SHUTTLE SERVICE.   9. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED WHEN THE TRAFFIC   ANALYSIS IS REVISED.   SITE PLAN COMMENTS:   10. PROVIDE DIAGONAL HATCHING ON THE PORTION OF INBOUND   LANE NOT NEEDED BY PASSENGER CARS AT THE SOUTHERN   ENTRANCE.   11. PROVIDE TURNAROUND SPACE FOR THE DEAD-END PARKING   AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE.   12. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) IS INTENDED FOR   DEVELOPMENTS WITH INNOVATIVE DESIGNS AND IS REQUIRED TO   BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL ELEMENTS OF CITY?S COMPREHENSIVE   PLAN. PLEASE IDENTIFY INNOVATIVE DESIGN ELEMENTS   ASSOCIATED WITH THIS RPD.   13. CLARIFY IF THE 8-FOOT WATERFRONT WALKWAY AND   OVERLOOK AREAS ARE OPEN FOR PUBLIC USE.   14. CONSTRUCT 12-FOOT SIDEWALK WITH 6-FOOT LANDSCAPE   BUFFER AND SHADE TREES ON VILLAGE BOULEVARD ALONG SITE   FRONTAGE. IT APPEARS THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED   RELOCATED SHADE TREES ARE SET BACK APPROXIMATELY 22   FEET FROM THE CURB. ALSO, CONSIDER CONSTRUCTING THE   SIDEWALK AROUND THE SHADE TREES AND UTILITIES AS IT   APPEARS THERE ARE 24 FEET OF SPACE BETWEEN THE PARKING   SPACES AND SHADE TREES.   CONDITIONS:   1. THE FLU AMENDMENT WILL BE VOLUNTARILY RESTRICTED TO   A MAXIMUM OF 30.5 DWELLING UNIT PER ACRE PER THE FLU   AMENDMENT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS OR AS REVISED BASED ON THE   REVISED FLU AMENDMENT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS.           SHING TSOI   CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT   561-494-1141   [email protected]   (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS) Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date 10-08-2019 Time   Rev Time   Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2019-10-08 16:46:45 FLU AMENDMENT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS COMMENTS:   1. INCLUDE THE SOURCES OF THE TRAFFIC DATA USED IN   TABLES 5 AND 6. ALSO, THE EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES FOR   VILLAGE BOULEVARD BETWEEN SHILOH DRIVE AND 45TH STREET   ARE SHOWN AS 0. PLEASE REVISE.   2. THE GENERALIZED SERVICE VOLUMES FOR VILLAGE   BOULEVARD SHOWN IN TABLE 8 ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE   VOLUMES PUBLISHED IN PALM BEACH COUNTY?S TPS. PLEASE   VERIFY AND REVISE. ALSO, PLEASE USE THE LATEST ADOPTED   2040 COST FEASIBLE MODEL VOLUMES FROM PALM BEACH TPA   DATED 8/17/2016.   3. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED WHEN THE TRAFFIC   ANALYSIS IS REVISED.   4. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED BY OTHER   REVIEWING AGENCIES AS PART OF THE EXPEDITED STATE   REVIEW PROCESS PER FLORIDA STATUTES 163.3184.   TRAFFIC ANALYSIS COMMENTS:   5. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER.   6. PLEASE INCLUDE HCM 6TH ANALYSIS AT THE FOLLOWING   INTERSECTIONS:   A. VILLAGE BOULEVARD/45TH STREET   B. VILLAGE BOULEVARD/SHILOH DRIVE   C. VILLAGE BOULEVARD/NORTH SITE DRIVEWAY   D. VILLAGE BOULEVARD/SOUTH SITE DRIVEWAY   E. VILLAGE BOULEVARD/CUMBERLAND DRIVE   F. VILLAGE BOULEVARD/SHENANDOAH ROAD   G. VILLAGE BOULEVARD/COMMUNITY DRIVE   7. THE EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES FOR VILLAGE BOULEVARD   BETWEEN SHILOH DRIVE AND 45TH STREET ARE SHOWN AS 0 IN   TABLE 3. ALSO, INCLUDE THE SOURCES OF TRAFFIC DATA. THE   LINK VOLUMES SHOULD BE BASED ON THE LATEST LINK OR   INTERSECTION COUNTS WHEN APPLICABLE. PLEASE REVISE.   8. ATTACH THE COMMITTED TRIP INFORMATION FOR 45TH   STREET/VILLAGE BOULEVARD, VILLAGE BOULEVARD/COMMUNITY   DRIVE, AND ADDITIONAL STUDY INTERSECTIONS AS REQUIRED   BELOW. THE COMMITTED TRIPS SHOWN FOR 45TH   STREET/VILLAGE BOULEVARD APPEAR TO BE BASED ON THE   COMMITTED TRIPS AT PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD/SPENCER   DRIVE ATTACHED IN THE REPORT. PLEASE VERIFY AND REVISE.   9. THE RTOR REDUCTION ON SHARED THROUGH-RIGHT LANES   SHOULD BE LESS THAN 60 VPH. PLEASE VERIFY AND REVISE.   10. PAGE 13 OF THE REPORT REFERENCES TABLE 5 BUT TABLE   5 IS NOT INCLUDED. PLEASE VERIFY AND REVISE.   11. CONSISTENT WITH THE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS, THE PROPOSED   DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE LIMITED IN INTENSITIES WHICH WOULD   NOT CAUSE SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON 45TH STREET UNLESS THE   IMPROVEMENT TO WIDEN 45TH STREET BETWEEN VILLAGE   BOULEVARD AND I-95 FROM 6 LANES TO 8 LANES IS IN PLACE   OR IS INCLUDED IN THE PALM BEACH TPA?S 5-YEAR   TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PLAN OR FDOT?S 5-YEAR WORK   PROGRAM.   12. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED WHEN THE   TRAFFIC ANALYSIS IS REVISED.   SITE PLAN COMMENTS:   13. PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS FROM THE NORTH ENTRANCE   ON VILLAGE BOULEVARD.   14. PROVIDE CROSS VEHICULAR ACCESS BETWEEN THE CHURCH   AND THE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF   THE CHURCH SITE, AND CROSS PEDESTRIAN ACCESSES ALONG   THE EAST AND NORTH SIDES OF THE CHURCH SITE.   15. PROVIDE TURNAROUND SPACE FOR THE DEAD-END PARKING   NEAR THE DOG PARK.   16. CLARIFY THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE 3-LEGGED AND   5-LEGGED INTERNAL INTERSECTIONS. PROVIDE STOP BARS AND   STOP SIGNS FOR A COMPLETE REVIEW. CONSIDER REALIGNING   THE INTERNAL INTERSECTIONS TO INTERSECTION AT 90-DEGREE   ANGLE.   17. INCLUDE THE REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING IN THE SITE   DATA TABLE AND SITE PLAN.   18. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) IS INTENDED FOR   DEVELOPMENTS WITH INNOVATIVE DESIGNS AND IS REQUIRED TO   BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL ELEMENTS OF CITY?S COMPREHENSIVE   PLAN. PLEASE IDENTIFY INNOVATIVE DESIGN ELEMENTS   ASSOCIATED WITH THIS RPD.   19. CONSTRUCT 12-FOOT SIDEWALK WITH 6-FOOT LANDSCAPE   BUFFER AND SHADE TREES ON VILLAGE BOULEVARD ALONG SITE   FRONTAGE.   20. SIDEWALK SHOULD MAINTAIN THE SAME LEVEL AS THE   DRIVEWAYS.   21. PROVIDE A 12-FOOT RECREATIONAL TRAIL ALONG THE   WATER FRONT WITH PICNIC AREAS LOCATED EVENLY ALONG THE   TRAIL.           SHING TSOI   CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT   561-494-1141   [email protected]   (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS)     Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 3 Status F Date 01-27-2020 Cont ID   Sent By jroach Date 01-27-2020 Time 16:44 Rev Time 0.00 Received By jroach Date 01-27-2020 Time 16:44 Sent To   Notes 2020-01-27 16:44:34 PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW   ________________________________________       DATE OF REVIEW: 01.27.2020   PROJECT NO.: Z19090014 AND Z19090015   CASE NO.: PB 1842 AND PB 1842A   ________________________________________       PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING   REVIEW COMMENTS:       1. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - APPROVAL LETTER FROM PALM BEACH   COUNTY SHALL BE PROVIDED INDICATING THAT THE PROJECT   COMPLIES WITH THE COUNTY TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS.       2. DID ALEX REVIEW THE UPDATED FLU TRAFFIC ANALYSIS?       3. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - UTILITY LETTER FROM COMCAST   SHALL BE PROVIDED.       4. [ SATISFIED ] - SOUTHBOUND LEFT TURN LANE REQUIRED   AT THE PRIMARY RESIDENTIAL ENTRANCE? WHAT IS THE IMPACT   ON THE EXISTING MEDIAN (TREES, ETC.)? WAS THIS REVIEWED   BY THE VILLAGES POA?       5. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - THE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS   INDICATES A VOLUNTARY RESTRICTION PROPOSED AT 30.5   DU/ACRE? WHAT IF THE FLU IS CHANGED TO MFMD (MAX 20   DU/ACRE) AND/OR THE RESTRICTION IS AT 14.52 DU/ACRE?   THIS WOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH THE UNDERLYING MF14   ZONING DESIGNATION THAT IS PROPOSED.       5.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] ? IF THE APPLICANT IS NOT REVISING   THEIR REQUEST TO AMEND THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP TO MFMD   INSTEAD OF MF, THEN STAFF WILL BE RECOMMENDING A   CONDITION OF APPROVAL THAT REFLECTS SUCH REQUIREMENT   PRIOR TO SCHEDULING A PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY   COMMISSION.       6. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - WHAT WERE THE CONCERNS OF   THE SPENCER LAKES HOA AND HOW ARE THEY BEING ADDRESSED?       6.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] ? IS FURTHER OUTREACH PROPOSED? IS   THE APPLICANT OF THE POSITION THAT THE RESIDENTS?   CONCERNS HAVE BEEN SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED?       7. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - THE ZONING MAP ON THE   COVER SHEET OF THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHOULD BE   UPDATED TO THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH?S MAP; DO NOT   USE PALM BEACH COUNTY?S AS THE CITY?S DESIGNATIONS ARE   NOT SPECIFIED.       7.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] ? THE ARCHITECT HAS PROVIDED FOR   THE CORRECT ZONING MAP, BUT IDENTIFIED THE PROJECT SITE   WITH ?MF-14?, WHICH IS NOT CORRECT.       8. [ SATISFIED ] - SHEET SP-1 WAS MISSING OUT OF THE   ARCHITECTURAL PDF.       9. [ SATISFIED ] - THE SITE PLAN SHALL SHOW THE ENTIRE   PROPERTY, INCLUDING THAT WHICH IS LAKE AREA.       10. [ SATISFIED ] - THE SITE PLAN SHOULD BE AT A LARGER   SCALE. IT?S OK TO HAVE THE OVERALL SITE PLAN AT SUCH A   SMALL SCALE, BUT A LARGER SCALE (MULTIPLE SHEETS WITH   MATCH LINES) NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED.       11. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - ALL DRIVE AISLES   CONTAINING PARKING ROWS ARE TO BE A MINIMUM OF 24 FEET   IN WIDTH; ONLY 22 FEET IS SHOWN. DRIVE AISLE THAT DO   NOT HAVE PARKING BACKING INTO THEM CAN BE NARROWER.       11.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - THE SITE PLAN AND CIVIL PLANS   ARE SHOWING DIFFERENT DIMENSION FOR THE DRIVE AISLES,   ESPECIALLY AT THE FRONT ENTRANCE BEFORE THE GATES. IS   THE APPLICANT CONFIDENT THAT THE VEHICLE USED FOR THE   TURNING RADIUS ANALYSIS IS SUFFICIENT TO REPRESENT   ACTUAL USE OF THE PARKING LOT WITH THE REDUCED DRIVE   AISLES?       12. [ SATISFIED SUBJECT TO GRANTING OF WAIVER ] -   FENCING WITHIN THE FRONT SETBACK (25 FEET) SHALL NOT   EXCEED 4 FEET IN HEIGHT.       13. [ SATISFIED ] - DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL   FENCING.       14. [ SATISFIED ] - THE SITE PLAN SHOULD PROVIDE THE   REFERENCES FOR DETAILS THAT ARE PROVIDED. FOR EXAMPLE,   SHEET SP-1 SHOULD REFERENCE DETAIL #1, SHEET LH-7 FOR   THE MONUMENT SIGN AND DETAIL #2, SHEET LH-7 FOR THE   TRELLIS FEATURE.       15. [ SATISFIED ] - SETBACKS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE   PROPOSED TRELLIS FEATURE.       16. [ SATISFIED ] - THE POOL NEEDS TO BE ENCLOSED BY A   CONTINUOUS FENCE OF AT LEAST 4 FEET IN HEIGHT WITH   SELF-CLOSING/SELF-LATCHING GATES. LATCHES SHALL BE AT   LEAST 54 INCHES ABOVE GRADE.       17. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - PLEASE EXPLAIN THE   FUNCTION OF THE MAIL KIOSK. WILL USPS HAVE ACCESS   INSIDE THE MAIN GATES AND BE ABLE TO PARK IN FRONT OF   THE KIOSK, OR ARE THEY EXPECTED TO PARK AT THE   CLUBHOUSE?       17.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] ? THERE APPEARS TO BE NOT SIDEWALK   ACCESSING THAT PORTION OF THE BUILDING THAT CONTAINS   THE MAIL BOXES. THE OPENING IN THE BUILDING FRONTS INTO   LANDSCAPE AREA. THERE NEEDS TO BE AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE.       18. [ SATISFIED ] - BIKE RACKS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR   BUILDING #6 AND THE CLUBHOUSE.       19. [ SATISFIED ] - THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT   INDICATES THAT THE NORTH DRIVEWAY (CROSS-ACCESS WITH   THE CHURCH) IS EMERGENCY EGRESS ONLY, BUT THE SITE PLAN   INDICATES AN ENTRANCE AS WELL AS AN EXIT; PLEASE   EXPLAIN.       20. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - IF THE INTENT IS THAT THE   COMMUNITY WOULD BE COMPLETELY ENCLOSED BY FENCING,   THERE ARE SEVERAL GAPS THAT DO ALLOW UNRESTRICTED   ACCESS.       20.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] ? NOTE THAT SOMEONE CAN ACCESS THE   PROPERTY BY WALKING AROUND THE SOUTHEAST SIDE OF THE   CLUBHOUSE (BY THE LAKE) AND CONTINUE ALONG THE LAKE   EDGE INTO THE REST OF THE DEVELOPMENT.       21. [ SATISFIED ] - SETBACKS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL   BUILDINGS WITHIN PROXIMITY TO A PROPERTY LINE. SETBACKS   WERE NOT SHOWN FOR THE CLUBHOUSE AND TRASH COMPACTOR.       22. [ SATISFIED ] - SHEET TC-1 WAS NOT PROVIDED.       23. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - DETAILS SHALL BE PROVIDED   FOR THE SCREENING AROUND THE PROPOSED LIFT STATION.       23.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] ? THE CONFIGURATION OF THE   COMPACTOR ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS DOES NOT MATCH THAT   WHICH IS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLANS. ALL PLANS SHALL BE   CONSISTENT. ADDITIONALLY, STAFF WOULD LIKE TO WORK WITH   THE APPLICANT TO BETTER SCREEN THIS AREA AS THE   PROPOSED DESIGN LEAVES AN AREA THAT IS WIDE OPEN AND   NOT AESTHETICALLY DESIRABLE.       24. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - THE AREA AROUND THE TRASH   COMPACTOR NEEDS TO BE WORKED OUT IN MORE DETAIL. THERE   SEEMS TO BE CONSTRAINTS IN ACCESSING THE TRASH   COMPACTOR BASED UPON THE LOCATION OF THE LIFT STATION   SCREENING, ETC.       24.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] ? SEE COMMENT 23.1 ABOVE.       25. [ SATISFIED ] - A WALKWAY NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED ON   THE NORTHWEST SIDE OF THE DETACHED GARAGE NEAR BUILDING   #3 SO THAT THERE IS A CONTINUOUS ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO   THE DOG PARK.       26. [ SATISFIED ] - AS REQUIRED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   APPLICATION, ALL SIDEWALKS SHALL BE DIMENSIONED.   PARTICULAR ATTENTION NEEDS TO OCCUR AT THOSE AREAS   WHERE THE VEHICLE OVERHANG OCCURS OVER THE SIDEWALK.   ENSURE THAT THE MINIMUM WIDTH OF THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE   IS PROVIDED.       27. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - DETAILS SHALL BE PROVIDED   OF THE PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN AT THE MAIN ENTRANCE.       27.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] ? ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS (CAPS ON   THE COLUMNS) SHALL NOT BE MORE THAN 10 PERCENT OF THE   MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF THE SIGN, WHICH IS 4 FEET.       28. [ SATISFIED ] - PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION   REGARDING THE TRASH COMPACTOR. THE MANEUVERABILITY PLAN   SHOWS A FRONT-LOADING DUMP TRUCK, BUT IF THE COMPACTOR   CONSISTS OF A LARGE ROLL-OFF DUMPSTER, THEN THE TRUCK   INFORMATION IS INCORRECT AND REQUIRES THAT IT BE LOADED   ONTO THE REAR OF THE VEHICLE.       29. [ SATISFIED ] - WHAT TYPE OF FIRE TRUCK WAS BEING   USED FOR THE MANEUVERABILITY PLAN. THERE IS POSSIBLE   CONCERN REGARDING THE ?CHICANE? THAT IS CREATED BY THE   ALIGNMENT OF THE NON-VISITOR DRIVE WITH THE MAIN   ENTRANCE GATE.       30. [ SATISFIED ] - DETAIL NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED   INDICATING THAT THE SIGNAGE REQUIRED FOR THE ACCESSIBLE   PARKING SPACES WILL NOT OCCUR WITHIN THE REQUIRED   OVERHANG, AND THAT IT WILL NOT ENCROACH INTO THE   REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SIDEWALK.       31. [ SATISFIED ] - A TURNAROUND SPACE NEEDS TO BE   PROVIDED AT THE DEAD-END PARKING IN FRONT OF BUILDING   #4.       32. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - THE JUSTIFICATION   STATEMENT INDICATES THAT ONE OF THE ?INNOVATIVE?   FEATURES OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS THE USE OF CURBING   (INSTEAD OF WHEEL STOPS) TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF   LANDSCAPE AREA. ACTUALLY, MOST OF THE AREAS WHERE THIS   OCCURS, THE OVERHANG OCCURS OVER A SIDEWALK, NOT AN   EXPANDED LANDSCAPE AREA. THERE ARE A LOT OF AREAS WHERE   WHEEL STOPS ARE STILL BEING PROPOSED ADJACENT TO   LANDSCAPING, AND IT DOESN?T APPEAR THAT THIS IS   NECESSARY TO ACCOMMODATE DRAINAGE.       32.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] ? THE USE OF THE CURBS IS NOT   REQUIRED, BUT STAFF IS JUST EMPHASIZING THAT IF THIS IS   BEING USED AS AN ?INNOVATIVE? FEATURE, THERE ARE A   NUMBER OF AREAS ON THE SITE WHERE THIS IS NOT BEING   DONE, BUT COULD BE.       33. [ SATISFIED ] - THE DIMENSIONS ON THE BUILDING   ELEVATIONS ARE INCORRECT. THE DIMENSIONS BETWEEN THE   LEVELS DO NOT CORRESPOND WITH THE ELEVATION DIMENSIONS.   FOR EXAMPLE, THE PLANS INDICATE 12 FEET 8 INCHES   BETWEEN THE TOP OF BEAM AND THE TOP OF RIDGE, BUT THE   ELEVATIONS GIVEN SHOW A 13 FOOT 2 INCH DIFFERENCE.       34. [ SATISFIED ] - THE DATA TABLE INDICATES THAT   BICYCLE PARKING IS REQUIRED FOR EVERY 15 PARKING   SPACES, BUT THE ZLDRS ONLY REQUIRE 1 BICYCLE SPACE FOR   EVERY 20 PARKING SPACES.       35. [ SATISFIED ] - THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT   INDICATES THAT 550 PARKING SPACES ARE BEING PROVIDED,   BUT SHEET SP-1 INDICATES 556. ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS AND   NARRATIVES ARE CONSISTENT.       36. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - PARKING DETAIL SHALL BE   PROVIDED.       36.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] ? DETAIL SHALL PROVIDE THE   DIMENSION OF THE STRIPING.       37. [ SATISFIED ] - LANDSCAPE TERMINAL ISLAND NORTH OF   BUILDING #6, AT THE WEST END OF THE 7 PARKING SPACES,   DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM DIMENSIONAL/LANDSCAPING   REQUIREMENTS.       38. [ SATISFIED ] - TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND ARE TO BE   PROVIDED BETWEEN THE GARAGES AND THE ADJACENT PARKING   ROWS.       39. [ NEW COMMENT ] ? THERE IS A LIGHT POLE IN THE   MIDDLE OF THE SIDEWALK, JUST INSIDE THE TRELLIS BY THE   CLUBHOUSE.   ________________________________________       PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:       A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL   DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.       B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE   PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X   17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.       C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.       D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE   ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE   CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL   REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.       E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)   RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED   COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE   APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE   WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.       F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE FEBRUARY 18, 2020,   PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE   SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED   DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN FEBRUARY 3, 2020.       G) TO BE PLACED ON THE FEBRUARY 18, 2020, PLANNING   BOARD AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO   LATER THAN FEBRUARY 3, 2020. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM, AND   BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE   CITY?S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; SUCH   REQUIREMENTS ARE ALSO PROVIDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT   APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE   PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED ABOVE.       H) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT   DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE   COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED.   ________________________________________       QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:       JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER   CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH   DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION   401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147   WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402       P: 561.822.1448   TTY: 800.955.8771   E: [email protected]       W: WPB.ORG     Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 2 Status F Date 12-18-2019 Cont ID   Sent By jroach Date 12-18-2019 Time 13:32 Rev Time 0.00 Received By jroach Date 12-18-2019 Time 13:31 Sent To   Notes 2019-12-18 13:32:31 PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW   ________________________________________       DATE OF REVIEW: 12.18.2019   PROJECT NO.: Z19090014 AND Z19090015   CASE NO.: PB 1842 AND PB 1842A   ________________________________________       PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING   REVIEW COMMENTS:       1. APPROVAL LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY SHALL BE   PROVIDED INDICATING THAT THE PROJECT COMPLIES WITH THE   COUNTY TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS.       2. DID ALEX REVIEW THE UPDATED FLU TRAFFIC ANALYSIS?       3. UTILITY LETTER FROM COMCAST SHALL BE PROVIDED.       4. SOUTHBOUND LEFT TURN LANE REQUIRED AT THE PRIMARY   RESIDENTIAL ENTRANCE?WHAT IS THE IMPACT ON THE EXISTING   MEDIAN (TREES, ETC.)? WAS THIS REVIEWED BY THE VILLAGES   POA?       5. THE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS INDICATES A VOLUNTARY   RESTRICTION PROPOSED AT 30.5 DU/ACRE?WHAT IF THE FLU IS   CHANGED TO MFMD (MAX 20 DU/ACRE) AND/OR THE RESTRICTION   IS AT 14.52 DU/ACRE? THIS WOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH THE   UNDERLYING MF14 ZONING DESIGNATION THAT IS PROPOSED.       6. WHAT WERE THE CONCERNS OF THE SPENCER LAKES HOA AND   HOW ARE THEY BEING ADDRESSED?       7. THE ZONING MAP ON THE COVER SHEET OF THE   ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHOULD BE UPDATED TO THE CITY OF   WEST PALM BEACH?S MAP; DO NOT USE PALM BEACH COUNTY?S   AS THE CITY?S DESIGNATIONS ARE NOT SPECIFIED.       8. SHEET SP-1 WAS MISSING OUT OF THE ARCHITECTURAL PDF.       9. THE SITE PLAN SHALL SHOW THE ENTIRE PROPERTY,   INCLUDING THAT WHICH IS LAKE AREA.       10. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD BE AT A LARGER SCALE. IT?S OK   TO HAVE THE OVERALL SITE PLAN AT SUCH A SMALL SCALE,   BUT A LARGER SCALE (MULTIPLE SHEETS WITH MATCH LINES)   NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED.       11. ALL DRIVE AISLES CONTAINING PARKING ROWS ARE TO BE   A MINIMUM OF 24 FEET IN WIDTH; ONLY 22 FEET IS SHOWN.   DRIVE AISLE THAT DO NOT HAVE PARKING BACKING INTO THEM   CAN BE NARROWER.       12. FENCING WITHIN THE FRONT SETBACK (25 FEET) SHALL   NOT EXCEED 4 FEET IN HEIGHT.       13. DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL FENCING.       14. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD PROVIDE THE REFERENCES FOR   DETAILS THAT ARE PROVIDED. FOR EXAMPLE, SHEET SP-1   SHOULD REFERENCE DETAIL #1, SHEET LH-7 FOR THE MONUMENT   SIGN AND DETAIL #2, SHEET LH-7 FOR THE TRELLIS FEATURE.       15. SETBACKS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE PROPOSED TRELLIS   FEATURE.       16. THE POOL NEEDS TO BE ENCLOSED BY A CONTINUOUS FENCE   OF AT LEAST 4 FEET IN HEIGHT WITH   SELF-CLOSING/SELF-LATCHING GATES. LATCHES SHALL BE AT   LEAST 54 INCHES ABOVE GRADE.       17. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE FUNCTION OF THE MAIL KIOSK. WILL   USPS HAVE ACCESS INSIDE THE MAIN GATES AND BE ABLE TO   PARK IN FRONT OF THE KIOSK, OR ARE THEY EXPECTED TO   PARK AT THE CLUBHOUSE?       18. BIKE RACKS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR BUILDING #6 AND   THE CLUBHOUSE.       19. THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INDICATES THAT THE   NORTH DRIVEWAY (CROSS-ACCESS WITH THE CHURCH) IS   EMERGENCY EGRESS ONLY?BUT THE SITE PLAN INDICATES AN   ENTRANCE AS WELL AS AN EXIT; PLEASE EXPLAIN.       20. IF THE INTENT IS THAT THE COMMUNITY WOULD BE   COMPLETELY ENCLOSED BY FENCING, THERE ARE SEVERAL GAPS   THAT DO ALLOW UNRESTRICTED ACCESS.       21. SETBACKS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL BUILDINGS WITHIN   PROXIMITY TO A PROPERTY LINE. SETBACKS WERE NOT SHOWN   FOR THE CLUBHOUSE AND TRASH COMPACTOR.       22. SHEET TC-1 WAS NOT PROVIDED.       23. DETAILS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE SCREENING AROUND   THE PROPOSED LIFT STATION.       24. THE AREA AROUND THE TRASH COMPACTOR NEEDS TO BE   WORKED OUT IN MORE DETAIL. THERE SEEMS TO BE   CONSTRAINTS IN ACCESSING THE TRASH COMPACTOR BASED UPON   THE LOCATION OF THE LIFT STATION SCREENING, ETC.       25. A WALKWAY NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED ON THE NORTHWEST   SIDE OF THE DETACHED GARAGE NEAR BUILDING #3 SO THAT   THERE IS A CONTINUOUS ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO THE DOG PARK.       26. AS REQUIRED BY THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION, ALL   SIDEWALKS SHALL BE DIMENSIONED. PARTICULAR ATTENTION   NEEDS TO OCCUR AT THOSE AREAS WHERE THE VEHICLE   OVERHANG OCCURS OVER THE SIDEWALK. ENSURE THAT THE   MINIMUM WIDTH OF THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE IS PROVIDED.       27. DETAILS SHALL BE PROVIDED OF THE PROPOSED MONUMENT   SIGN AT THE MAIN ENTRANCE.       28. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION REGARDING THE TRASH   COMPACTOR. THE MANEUVERABILITY PLAN SHOWS A   FRONT-LOADING DUMP TRUCK?BUT IF THE COMPACTOR CONSISTS   OF A LARGE ROLL-OFF DUMPSTER, THEN THE TRUCK   INFORMATION IS INCORRECT AND REQUIRES THAT IT BE LOADED   ONTO THE REAR OF THE VEHICLE.       29. WHAT TYPE OF FIRE TRUCK WAS BEING USED FOR THE   MANEUVERABILITY PLAN. THERE IS POSSIBLE CONCERN   REGARDING THE ?CHICANE? THAT IS CREATED BY THE   ALIGNMENT OF THE NON-VISITOR DRIVE WITH THE MAIN   ENTRANCE GATE.       30. DETAIL NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED INDICATING THAT THE   SIGNAGE REQUIRED FOR THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES WILL   NOT OCCUR WITHIN THE REQUIRED OVERHANG, AND THAT IT   WILL NOT ENCROACH INTO THE REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE   SIDEWALK.       31. A TURNAROUND SPACE NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED AT THE   DEAD-END PARKING IN FRONT OF BUILDING #4.       32. THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INDICATES THAT ONE OF   THE ?INNOVATIVE? FEATURES OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS   THE USE OF CURBING (INSTEAD OF WHEEL STOPS) TO INCREASE   THE AMOUNT OF LANDSCAPE AREA. ACTUALLY, MOST OF THE   AREAS WHERE THIS OCCURS, THE OVERHANG OCCURS OVER A   SIDEWALK, NOT AN EXPANDED LANDSCAPE AREA. THERE ARE A   LOT OF AREAS WHERE WHEEL STOPS ARE STILL BEING PROPOSED   ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPING, AND IT DOESN?T APPEAR THAT   THIS IS NECESSARY TO ACCOMMODATE DRAINAGE.       33. THE DIMENSIONS ON THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS ARE   INCORRECT. THE DIMENSIONS BETWEEN THE LEVELS DO NOT   CORRESPOND WITH THE ELEVATION DIMENSIONS. FOR EXAMPLE,   THE PLANS INDICATE 12? 8? BETWEEN THE TOP OF BEAM AND   THE TOP OF RIDGE, BUT THE ELEVATIONS GIVEN SHOW A 13?   2? DIFFERENCE.       34. THE DATA TABLE INDICATES THAT BICYCLE PARKING IS   REQUIRED FOR EVERY 15 PARKING SPACES, BUT THE ZLDRS   ONLY REQUIRE 1 BICYCLE SPACE FOR EVERY 20 PARKING   SPACES.       35. THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INDICATES THAT 550   PARKING SPACES ARE BEING PROVIDED, BUT SHEET SP-1   INDICATES 556. ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS AND NARRATIVES ARE   CONSISTENT.       36. PARKING DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED.       37. LANDSCAPE TERMINAL ISLAND NORTH OF BUILDING #6, AT   THE WEST END OF THE 7 PARKING SPACES, DOES NOT MEET THE   MINIMUM DIMENSIONAL/LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS.       38. TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND ARE TO BE PROVIDED   BETWEEN THE GARAGES AND THE ADJACENT PARKING ROWS.   ________________________________________       PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:       A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL   DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.       B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE   PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X   17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.       C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.       D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE   ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE   CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL   REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.       E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)   RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED   COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE   APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE   WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.       F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE FEBRUARY 18, 2020,   PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE   SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED   DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN JANUARY 10, 2020.       G) TO BE PLACED ON THE FEBRUARY 18, 2020, PLANNING   BOARD AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO   LATER THAN FEBRUARY 3, 2020. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM, AND   BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE   CITY?S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; SUCH   REQUIREMENTS ARE ALSO PROVIDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT   APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE   PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED ABOVE.       H) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT   DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE   COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED.   ________________________________________       QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:       JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER   CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH   DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION   401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147   WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402       P: 561.822.1448   TTY: 800.955.8771   E: [email protected]       W: WPB.ORG     Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-09-2019 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 10-09-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By pgreilic Date 10-09-2019 Time 16:37 Sent To   Notes 2019-10-09 16:37:24 CASE NUMBER: PB 1842 & 1842A (Z19090014/5)   PROJECT NAME: BROADSTONE LAKESIDE REZONING AND FUTURE   LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT   ADDRESS: 3600 VILLAGE BOULEVARD       ---CONTACT PAUL GREILICH @ (561) 822-1443 OR JOHN ROACH   @ 561-822-1448   ---PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN   WRITTEN FORMAT.   ---WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF   ELEVEN (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN   .PNG/.PDF FORMAT OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES   ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF   INFORMATION/PLANS TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.   ---PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT   RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS   FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS/THE PPRC MEETING (BY   7/8/19), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY   FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT   APPLICATION.   ---PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED   IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION   94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT   REGULATIONS.       1) PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION OF HOW THE APPLICATION AS   PRESENTED MEETS THE INTENT OF SEC. 94-207(A)(1),   INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES.       2) IT IS UNCLEAR WHERE THE EDGE OF THE PROPOSED   LAKE/RETENTION POND IS BEING PROPOSED ALONG PERIMETER   OF THE SITE. PLEASE CLEARLY LABEL THE EDGE OF WATER AND   ANY ASSOCIATED EASEMENTS THROUGHOUT ON THE SITE PLAN.       3) THE 5-WAY INTERSECTION BEING PROPOSED TO THE   NORTHWEST OF BUILDING 6 WILL LIKELY CREATE CONFUSION   AND UNNECESSARY CONFLICTS. APPLICANT SHOULD EXPLORE THE   INCLUSION OF A ROUNDABOUT IN THIS LOCATION IN THE EVENT   THIS GENERAL DESIGN IS RETAINED.       4) ENHANCE INTERNAL PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND   CONNECTIVITY THROUGHOUT THE SITE (DESIGNATED WALKS,   STRATEGICALLY PLACED CROSSWALKS, ETC.). STAFF STRONGLY   RECOMMENDS A MORE THOUGHTFUL CONSIDERATION OF THE SITE   AND IMPROVED DESIGN THAT BETTER INTEGRATES PARKING   AREAS, THE INCLUSION OF LOW COST AMENITIES SUCH AS   SMALL PARKS AND GATHERING SPACE.       5) COMPLETE WALKING PATHS AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE   SITE TO ENABLE RESIDENTS TO WALK IN A CIRCUIT AND REACH   THE POOL AREA WITHOUT MEANDERING IF FRONT OF BUILDINGS.   WHERE POSSIBLE, WALKING PATHS SHOULD BE WIDER THAN 5   FEET.       6) PROVIDE A DIRECT PEDESTRIAN PATH (SIDEWALK, STRIPING   OR BOTH) TO THE DOG PARK TO ALLOW SAFE AND EFFICIENT   ACCESS       7) DISTRIBUTE PARKING MORE CONVENIENTLY THROUGHOUT THE   SITE TO MINIMIZE CONFLICTS BETWEEN PEDESTRIANS AND   MOTORISTS AND REDUCE THE DISTANCE RESIDENTS WILL TRAVEL   TO THEIR UNITS FROM THE PARKING AREAS.       8) LABEL DIMENSIONS OF PARKING SPACES, DRIVE AISLES,   DRIVEWAYS, SIDEWALKS, ETC.       9) PLEASE PROVIDE AN OVERALL SITE PLAN WHICH   INCORPORATES THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AS PART OF THE   APPLICATION SUBMITTED CONCURRENTLY, PB1841 & 1841A ?   Z19090012/3.       10) CONSISTENT WITH RECENTLY APPROVED PROJECTS IN THE   CITY, STAFF SUPPORTS NARROWING DRIVE AISLES (TO AS FEW   AS 20 FEET). DOING SO WILL MINIMIZE OVERALL IMPERVIOUS   SURFACE, INCREASE LANDSCAPING IN TERMINAL ISLANDS AND   SLOW VEHICLES TO HELP MINIMIZE CONFLICTS AT PROPOSED   INTERSECTIONS.       11) STAFF SUPPORTS REDUCING THE DEPTH OF PARKING SPACES   BY INCLUDING A 2-FOOT GRASS OVERHANG. THE CURB WOULD   FUNCTION AS WHEEL STOPS. ALSO CONSIDER THE INCLUSION OF   SMALL CAR SPACES TO REDUCE OVERALL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE   AREA.       12) ADD REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING SPACES AND DISTRIBUTE   THROUGHOUT THE SITE AND INCLUDE CITY-STANDARD BIKE RACK   DETAIL.       13) PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-207(5), ALL UTILITIES,   INCLUDING TELEPHONE, CABLE TELEVISION, AND ELECTRICAL   SERVICE SYSTEMS, SHALL BE INSTALLED UNDERGROUND.       14) A REPLAT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES WILL BE   REQUIRED.       15) PROVIDE LETTERS FROM ALL OF THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC   UTILITIES CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT   ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE   WITH THE PROVISION OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, FPU, FPL,   AND COMCAST.       16) ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, INCLUDING NEW   CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR IMPROVEMENT OF AN   EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS   ARE EQUAL OR GREATER THAN $750,000 IS SUBJECT TO THE   ART IN PUBLIC PLACES REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 78,   ARTICLE V, OF THE CITY?S CODE OF ORDINANCES. CONTACT   SYBILLE WELTER @ 561-822-1521 OR [email protected] FOR   ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.       17) A TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW LETTER   FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION, VERIFYING   THAT THE PROJECT MEETS THE TPS STANDARDS OF THE COUNTY   WILL BE REQUIRED.       18) A SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION (SCAD)   WILL BE REQUIRED.       19) ADDITIONAL WAIVERS MAY NEED TO BE REQUESTED IN THE   EVENT THAT PROVISIONS OF THE CITY?S ZONING AND LAND   DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS CANNOT BE SATISFIED.   SPECIFICALLY, LANDSCAPE BUFFERS AS PROPOSED DO NOT MEET   REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE XIV.                   Print Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved