Plan Review Details - Project Z19090013
Plan Review Stops For Project Z19090013
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 10-09-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 10-09-2019 Time 19:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 10-09-2019 Time 19:58 Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-09 20:01:14DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION:
  
 NO COMMENT ON THE PROPOSED REZONING. SEE PROJECT #
 Z19090015 FOR COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED APARTRMENT
 COMPLEX CONSTRUCTION.
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status P Date 12-04-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 12-04-2019 Time   Rev Time 1.00
Received By rrossano Date 12-04-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-12-04 07:24:29PASSED WITH PROVISO:
  
 FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SHOW PROPOSED DCDA ON
 PRIVATE PROPERTY.
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-07-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 10-07-2019 Time   Rev Time  
Received By rrossano Date 10-07-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-07 11:58:241. THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF
 REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY
 AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND
 WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE
 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK
 BELOW: HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=
 ~\WPB_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION
 -FULL-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC0
 2A97B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF
 THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE
 FOUND HERE: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBL
 IC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
 2. CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH,
 FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08, ADOPTED
 SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)
 CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. SEC. 90-7.
 POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER SERVICE
 FACILITIES OF THE CITY.
 THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
 BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
 BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
 3. AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
 MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI
 CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL
 4. PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS
 OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES,
 INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND
 SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES,
 METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE
 SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING
 GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS,
 ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL
 INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER
 LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN
 VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
 ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER
 OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &
 TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL
 UTILITY CROSSINGS.
 5. CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY
 ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
 RIGHT OF WAY.
 6. PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE
 DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB
 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION).
 7. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM
 AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE
 PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER.
 8. SHOW VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION INFORMATION
 (NAVD 88 AND NGVD 29) ON ALL SHEETS.
 9. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF EXISTING AND REVISED
 PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED
 IMPACTED AREAS.
 10. PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
 PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
 11. COORDINATE WITH MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE
 SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING
 PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT
 HIM AT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]
 12. PROVIDE UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY
 PERSONNEL TO PROPOSED UTILITIES INCLUDING WATER METERS.
 13. PLEASE PROVIDE 10 FT. MIN. HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE
 BETWEEN PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER LINES.
 14. PLEASE SHOW 10 IN. X 6 IN. TAP AT POINT OF SERVICE
 (NO REDUCER).
 15. PLEASE SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL
 OUT MATERIAL.
 16. PLEASE PROVIDE INLET ELEVATIONS AT PROPOSED
 MANHOLES.
 17. SPECIFY WATER MAIN IN RIGHT OF WAY AS 6 IN. DIP
 MATERIAL.
 18. PLEASE SHOW VALVE SIZES AND LOCATIONS. LABEL CITY
 POINT OF SERVICE.
 19. LABEL WATER LINES AS ?PRIVATE? WHERE APPLICABLE.
 20. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION OF WATER
 METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION.
 21. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE CALLOUT
 DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA AND FIRE BACKFLOW
 PREVENTER AS DCDA.
 22. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES
 OF WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
 23. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING
 APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT
 SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING
 SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED
 LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
 24. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL PROVIDE SANITARY
 ELEVATIONS AT MANHOLE TIE-IN.
 25. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES
 ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY
 LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT
 PARCELS.
 26. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES
 ARE BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL
 ADDRESSES.
 27. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN TRENCHING IN
 IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE 50
 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF
 PROPOSED TRENCH PER CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-9.
 28. PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING.
  
 -----------------------------
  
 PLEASE SEE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY,
 CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR CITY OF WPB UTILITIES:
  
 FAMILY CHURCH OFF VILLAGE (SHEET C-150)
 - PROP DDCV SHOULD BE LABELED WITH CORRECT WS SD #
 A.) SIZE OF DDCV SHOULD BE LABELED
 B.) NEED CITY POINT OF SERVICE VALVE ADDED IN THE 12?
 U.E BEFORE/UPSTREAM OF DDCV.
 C.) MATERIAL OF 6 IN. WATER MAIN NEEDS TO BE ADDED TO
 LABEL (DIP, ETC..).
 D.) EXISTING DDCV TO WEST WOULD HAVE TO BE UPGRADED TO
 COMPLIANT ASSEMBLY IF NOT ALREADY -> FIELD CUSTOMER
 SERVICE WOULD HAVE TO FIELD VERIFY. SIZE ALSO NEEDS
 LABELING.
 E.) WATER LINE FEEDING EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT NEEDS TO
 BE LABELED WITH SIZE.
  
 - IS THERE A FIRE FDC ON FIRELINE? DO NOT SEE ONE ON
 PLAN. DOES IT NEED ONE? (VERIFY WITH FIRE DEPT.)
  
 - NEED TO SHOW LOCATION AND SIZE OF EXISTING DOMESTIC
 WATER METER & BACKFLOW PREVENTERS.
 A.) PLAN DOES NOT MAKE SENSE- HOW WAS EXISTING 2 IN.
 DOMESTIC SERVICE FED AT BUILDING- PLAN DOES NOT SHOW
 ANY PIPING TO BE REMOVED ON UTILITY PLAN.
  
 - SHOW 6 IN. PVC FIRE PIPE TO THE EAST THAT IS BEING
 REMOVED ON THE UTILITY PLAN.
  
 MR. HURLEY CAN BE REACHED AT 561-494-2262 OR
 [email protected]
  
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS.
  
 RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT
 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 [email protected]
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 10-04-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 10-04-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 10-04-2019 Time 16:29 Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-04 16:31:29THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED REZONING.
  
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 02-27-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 02-27-2020 Time 16:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 02-27-2020 Time 16:59 Sent To  
Notes
2020-02-27 17:00:07FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: FIRST BAPTIST CSPD
 FEBRUARY 27, 2020
 MINOR SUBDIVISION Z19090011: NO COMMENTS.
 FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT Z19090012: NO COMMENTS.
 REZONING TO CSPD Z19090013
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE AMOUNT OF REQUIRED AND
 PROVIDED OPEN SPACE AND LANDSCAPE AREA ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF 50 PERCENT FOR CSPD
 ZONING PER SECTION 94-203.
  
 2. SATISFIED. SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR MINIMUM SHADE
 TREE AND FLOWERING TREE REQUIREMENTS PER SECTION
 94-443(C)(2)B. BASED ON THE 50 PERCENT REQUIRED FOR
 CSPD ZONING.
 CALCULATIONS ARE TO BE ROUNDED UP FOR EACH REQUIREMENT,
 SO 81 SHADE TREES REQUIRED, 21 FLOWERING TREES REQUIRED
 FOR A TOTAL OF 102. CHART INDICATES 125 TREES PROVIDED,
 AND PLANT LIST ONLY SHOWS 111.
  
  
 3. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL CALCULATIONS FOR THE REQUIRED
 TREES FOR BUFFER SEGMENTS ON A PERIMETER BUFFER
 REQUIREMENT CHART INCLUDING LINEAR FOOTAGE OF ALL
 PROPERTY LINE SEGMENTS.
 BUFFER SEGMENTS NEED TO BE DIVIDED AND SHOWN AS SOUTH
 (VILLAGE BLVD.), WEST (ADJACENT TO CANAL), NORTH (ALL
 SEGMENTS), AND EAST (PARKING LOT SIDE). SHOW TOTAL
 BUFFER LENGTH AND DIVIDE BY 30, ROUND UP TO THE NEXT
 FULL TREE AND SHOW THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF TREES, THE
 NUMBER PROVIDED, AND THE NUMBER REQUESTED TO BE WAIVED
 FOR THAT SEGMENT.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE BUFFER ALONG
 VILLAGE BOULEVARD WITH ACCESS DRIVEWAYS TO SHOW THEY DO
 NOT EXCEED 25% INTERRUPTION FOR VEHICULAR ACCESS AS
 REQUIRED BY SECTION 94-443(B)(2).
  
 5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE
 BUFFER PLANTINGS ALONG ALL PROPERTY LINES WITH THE
 REQUIRED TREES OR NUMBER OF SUBSTITUTE PALMS PER
 CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(D).
 INDICATE THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER LOCATIONS ON THE SITE
 PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN.
 SEE COMMENT #3 ABOVE. PLACE A DOTTED LINE ON PLANS 5
 FEET FROM PROPERTY LINE AND LABEL AS LANDSCAPE BUFFER.
  
 6. SATISFIED. ALL MISSING OR DEAD SHRUBS MUST BE
 REPLACED IN ALL BUFFER HEDGES AS REQUIRED. ADD A NOTE
 TO THE PLAN.
  
 7. SATISFIED. MODIFY THE PLANT LIST TO ADD COLUMNS FOR
 NATIVE PLANT AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVELS TO PROVIDE
 EASIER REFERENCE.
  
 8. SATISFIED. ADD RELOCATED TREES TO THE PLANT LIST AND
 COUNT THEM TOWARD THE REQUIRED TREES.
 PROVIDE THE EXACT BREAKDOWN OF PALMS AND TREES ON THE
 PLANT LIST.
 SPLIT OAKS AND SABALS INTO 2 LINES.
  
 9. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE REQUIRED FOUNDATION PLANTING
 TO 30 PERCENT REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-443(E)(1).
  
 10. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL REQUIRED CURBS ADJACENT TO
 LANDSCAPE AREAS PER SECTION 94-443 (C)(5). THERE APPEAR
 TO BE AREAS THAT ARE NOT CURBED. LANDSCAPE DIVIDER
 STRIPS CAN HAVE CURBS INSTEAD OF WHEEL STOPS TO
 INCREASE THE LANDSCAPE AREA FOR THE TREES. IF DRAINAGE
 IS A CONCERN, THEY CAN BE DESIGNED TO ROUTE WATER INTO
 THE LANDSCAPE AREAS.
 THERE ARE AREAS WITH EXISTING TREES THAT APPEAR TO HAVE
 THE PAVEMENT AND CURBS TOO CLOSE TO THE BASE OF TREES.
  
 11. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING
 AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND
 LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH
 SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4).
 NEW PAVED AREAS NEED TO MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS, SEE
 FIGURE XIV-1 LANDSCAPE AREAS FOR PARKING LOTS IN
 SECTION 94-443(C)(3) FOR THE AREAS THAT QUALIFY AS
 INTERIOR LANDSCAPING FOR VEHICULAR USE AREA.
 PROVIDE AS A LARGER 1:20 SCALE PLAN FOR REVIEW.
  
 12. SATISFIED. ALL NEW OR ALTERED ROWS OF PARKING MUST
 HAVE TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS MEETING THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A. FOR LANDSCAPE
 AREA WIDTH OF 8 FEET INSIDE CURB FOR THE FULL LENGTH OF
 THE PARKING SPACE. THE REQUIRED TERMINAL ISLANDS SHADE
 TREES ARE MISSING WHERE THE EXISTING PARKING AREA IS
 BEING ABBREVIATED, AND SOME ARE NOT CLEAR TO IDENTIFY
 THE QUALIFYING TREE. REVISE PLAN TO MEET REQUIREMENTS.
 REQUEST A WAIVER IF REQUIREMENTS CANNOT BE MET AND
 PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION.
 THERE IS ONE TERMINAL ISLAND LACKING THE REQUIRED TREE.
 SMALL SPACE CAN BE MET WITH PALMS.
  
 13. SATISFIED. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE
 CHART TO THE CURRENT CODE AND PROVIDE THE MINIMUM 50
 POINTS PER SECTION 94-442(G) BASED ON THE PLANT LIST
 AND ITEMS THAT QUALIFY. SOME WORDING AND PERCENTAGES
 ARE NOT CORRECT.
  
 14. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
 LIGHTING LOCATIONS SHOWN MAY CONFLICT WITH EXISTING
 TREE CANOPY, CONSIDERATION SHOULD BE MADE TO ADJUST
 POLE HEIGHTS TO BELOW THE TREE CANOPY TO BE MORE
 EFFICIENT WITH LIGHTING AND AVOID ADDING MAINTENANCE
 COSTS FOR TREE PRUNING.
  
 15. SATISFIED. THERE APPEAR TO BE CONFLICTS IN MANY
 LOCATIONS BETWEEN TREES AND DRAINAGE LINES, WATER AND
 SEWER LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. ADJUST LOCATIONS OF
 TREES OR UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH
 LANDSCAPING.
 THERE ARE STILL SOME CONFLICTS WHERE WATER LINES ARE IN
 DIRECT CONFLICT WITH NEW TREE PLACEMENT AND EXISTING
 TREES.
 THERE IS ONE NEW OAK TREE TO THE RIGHT OF THE FRONT
 ENTRANCE OF THE BUILDING THAT IS PLACED ON TOP OF FIRE
 LINE.
 .
 16. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND SCREENING FOR ALL
 ABOVE GROUND UTILITY VALVES, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS, A/C
 UNITS, AND FPL TRANSFORMERS.
  
 17. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS
 REQUIRED TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES AND PROVIDE A ROOT
 BARRIER DETAIL.
  
 18. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF
 PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
 PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 12/5/19:
 19. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN TO
 SHOW TREE #216 FINAL LOCATION, AS TREE #53 IS LABELED
 IN TWO LOCATIONS.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 02-03-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 02-03-2020 Time 15:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 02-03-2020 Time 15:47 Sent To  
Notes
2020-02-03 15:47:32FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: FIRST BAPTIST CSPD
 FEBRUARY 3, 2020
 MINOR SUBDIVISION Z19090011: NO COMMENTS.
 FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT Z19090012: NO COMMENTS.
 REZONING TO CSPD Z19090013
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE AMOUNT OF REQUIRED AND
 PROVIDED OPEN SPACE AND LANDSCAPE AREA ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF 50 PERCENT FOR CSPD
 ZONING PER SECTION 94-203.
  
 2. SATISFIED. SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR MINIMUM SHADE
 TREE AND FLOWERING TREE REQUIREMENTS PER SECTION
 94-443(C)(2)B. BASED ON THE 50 PERCENT REQUIRED FOR
 CSPD ZONING.
 CALCULATIONS ARE TO BE ROUNDED UP FOR EACH REQUIREMENT,
 SO 81 SHADE TREES REQUIRED, 21 FLOWERING TREES REQUIRED
 FOR A TOTAL OF 102. CHART INDICATES 125 TREES PROVIDED,
 AND PLANT LIST ONLY SHOWS 111.
  
  
 3. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL CALCULATIONS FOR THE REQUIRED
 TREES FOR BUFFER SEGMENTS ON A PERIMETER BUFFER
 REQUIREMENT CHART INCLUDING LINEAR FOOTAGE OF ALL
 PROPERTY LINE SEGMENTS.
 BUFFER SEGMENTS NEED TO BE DIVIDED AND SHOWN AS SOUTH
 (VILLAGE BLVD.), WEST (ADJACENT TO CANAL), NORTH (ALL
 SEGMENTS), AND EAST (PARKING LOT SIDE). SHOW TOTAL
 BUFFER LENGTH AND DIVIDE BY 30, ROUND UP TO THE NEXT
 FULL TREE AND SHOW THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF TREES, THE
 NUMBER PROVIDED, AND THE NUMBER REQUESTED TO BE WAIVED
 FOR THAT SEGMENT.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE BUFFER ALONG
 VILLAGE BOULEVARD WITH ACCESS DRIVEWAYS TO SHOW THEY DO
 NOT EXCEED 25% INTERRUPTION FOR VEHICULAR ACCESS AS
 REQUIRED BY SECTION 94-443(B)(2).
  
 5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE
 BUFFER PLANTINGS ALONG ALL PROPERTY LINES WITH THE
 REQUIRED TREES OR NUMBER OF SUBSTITUTE PALMS PER
 CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(D).
 INDICATE THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER LOCATIONS ON THE SITE
 PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN.
 SEE COMMENT #3 ABOVE. PLACE A DOTTED LINE ON PLANS 5
 FEET FROM PROPERTY LINE AND LABEL AS LANDSCAPE BUFFER.
  
 6. SATISFIED. ALL MISSING OR DEAD SHRUBS MUST BE
 REPLACED IN ALL BUFFER HEDGES AS REQUIRED. ADD A NOTE
 TO THE PLAN.
  
 7. SATISFIED. MODIFY THE PLANT LIST TO ADD COLUMNS FOR
 NATIVE PLANT AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVELS TO PROVIDE
 EASIER REFERENCE.
  
 8. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ADD RELOCATED TREES TO THE
 PLANT LIST AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE REQUIRED TREES.
 PROVIDE THE EXACT BREAKDOWN OF PALMS AND TREES ON THE
 PLANT LIST.
 SPLIT OAKS AND SABALS INTO 2 LINES.
  
 9. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE REQUIRED FOUNDATION PLANTING
 TO 30 PERCENT REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-443(E)(1).
  
 10. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL REQUIRED CURBS ADJACENT TO
 LANDSCAPE AREAS PER SECTION 94-443 (C)(5). THERE APPEAR
 TO BE AREAS THAT ARE NOT CURBED. LANDSCAPE DIVIDER
 STRIPS CAN HAVE CURBS INSTEAD OF WHEEL STOPS TO
 INCREASE THE LANDSCAPE AREA FOR THE TREES. IF DRAINAGE
 IS A CONCERN, THEY CAN BE DESIGNED TO ROUTE WATER INTO
 THE LANDSCAPE AREAS.
 THERE ARE AREAS WITH EXISTING TREES THAT APPEAR TO HAVE
 THE PAVEMENT AND CURBS TOO CLOSE TO THE BASE OF TREES.
  
 11. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING
 AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND
 LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH
 SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4).
 NEW PAVED AREAS NEED TO MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS, SEE
 FIGURE XIV-1 LANDSCAPE AREAS FOR PARKING LOTS IN
 SECTION 94-443(C)(3) FOR THE AREAS THAT QUALIFY AS
 INTERIOR LANDSCAPING FOR VEHICULAR USE AREA.
 PROVIDE AS A LARGER 1:20 SCALE PLAN FOR REVIEW.
  
 12. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ALL NEW OR ALTERED ROWS OF
 PARKING MUST HAVE TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS MEETING
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A. FOR
 LANDSCAPE AREA WIDTH OF 8 FEET INSIDE CURB FOR THE FULL
 LENGTH OF THE PARKING SPACE. THE REQUIRED TERMINAL
 ISLANDS SHADE TREES ARE MISSING WHERE THE EXISTING
 PARKING AREA IS BEING ABBREVIATED, AND SOME ARE NOT
 CLEAR TO IDENTIFY THE QUALIFYING TREE. REVISE PLAN TO
 MEET REQUIREMENTS.
 REQUEST A WAIVER IF REQUIREMENTS CANNOT BE MET AND
 PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION.
 THERE IS ONE TERMINAL ISLAND LACKING THE REQUIRED TREE.
 SMALL SPACE CAN BE MET WITH PALMS.
  
 13. SATISFIED. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE
 CHART TO THE CURRENT CODE AND PROVIDE THE MINIMUM 50
 POINTS PER SECTION 94-442(G) BASED ON THE PLANT LIST
 AND ITEMS THAT QUALIFY. SOME WORDING AND PERCENTAGES
 ARE NOT CORRECT.
  
 14. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
 LIGHTING LOCATIONS SHOWN MAY CONFLICT WITH EXISTING
 TREE CANOPY, CONSIDERATION SHOULD BE MADE TO ADJUST
 POLE HEIGHTS TO BELOW THE TREE CANOPY TO BE MORE
 EFFICIENT WITH LIGHTING AND AVOID ADDING MAINTENANCE
 COSTS FOR TREE PRUNING.
  
 15. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THERE APPEAR TO BE CONFLICTS
 IN MANY LOCATIONS BETWEEN TREES AND DRAINAGE LINES,
 WATER AND SEWER LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. ADJUST
 LOCATIONS OF TREES OR UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE
 CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
 THERE ARE STILL SOME CONFLICTS WHERE WATER LINES ARE IN
 DIRECT CONFLICT WITH NEW TREE PLACEMENT AND EXISTING
 TREES.
 THERE IS ONE NEW OAK TREE TO THE RIGHT OF THE FRONT
 ENTRANCE OF THE BUILDING THAT IS PLACED ON TOP OF FIRE
 LINE.
 .
 16. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND SCREENING FOR ALL
 ABOVE GROUND UTILITY VALVES, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS, A/C
 UNITS, AND FPL TRANSFORMERS.
  
 17. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS
 REQUIRED TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES AND PROVIDE A ROOT
 BARRIER DETAIL.
  
 18. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF
 PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
 PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 12/5/19:
 19. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN TO
 SHOW TREE #216 FINAL LOCATION, AS TREE #53 IS LABELED
 IN TWO LOCATIONS.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 12-06-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 12-06-2019 Time 17:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 12-06-2019 Time 17:06 Sent To  
Notes
2019-12-06 17:07:21FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: FIRST BAPTIST CSPD
 DECEMBER 6, 2019
 MINOR SUBDIVISION Z19090011: NO COMMENTS.
 FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT Z19090012: NO COMMENTS.
 REZONING TO CSPD Z19090013
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE AMOUNT OF REQUIRED AND
 PROVIDED OPEN SPACE AND LANDSCAPE AREA ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF 50 PERCENT FOR CSPD
 ZONING PER SECTION 94-203.
  
 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR
 MINIMUM SHADE TREE AND FLOWERING TREE REQUIREMENTS PER
 SECTION 94-443(C)(2)B. BASED ON THE 50 PERCENT REQUIRED
 FOR CSPD ZONING.
 CALCULATIONS ARE TO BE ROUNDED UP FOR EACH REQUIREMENT,
 SO 81 SHADE TREES REQUIRED, 21 FLOWERING TREES REQUIRED
 FOR A TOTAL OF 102. CHART INDICATES 125 TREES PROVIDED,
 AND PLANT LIST ONLY SHOWS 111.
  
  
 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW ALL CALCULATIONS FOR THE
 REQUIRED TREES FOR BUFFER SEGMENTS ON A PERIMETER
 BUFFER REQUIREMENT CHART INCLUDING LINEAR FOOTAGE OF
 ALL PROPERTY LINE SEGMENTS.
 BUFFER SEGMENTS NEED TO BE DIVIDED AND SHOWN AS SOUTH
 (VILLAGE BLVD.), WEST (ADJACENT TO CANAL), NORTH (ALL
 SEGMENTS), AND EAST (PARKING LOT SIDE). SHOW TOTAL
 BUFFER LENGTH AND DIVIDE BY 30, ROUND UP TO THE NEXT
 FULL TREE AND SHOW THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF TREES, THE
 NUMBER PROVIDED, AND THE NUMBER REQUESTED TO BE WAIVED
 FOR THAT SEGMENT.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE BUFFER ALONG
 VILLAGE BOULEVARD WITH ACCESS DRIVEWAYS TO SHOW THEY DO
 NOT EXCEED 25% INTERRUPTION FOR VEHICULAR ACCESS AS
 REQUIRED BY SECTION 94-443(B)(2).
  
 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 5 FOOT
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER PLANTINGS ALONG ALL PROPERTY LINES
 WITH THE REQUIRED TREES OR NUMBER OF SUBSTITUTE PALMS
 PER CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(D).
 INDICATE THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER LOCATIONS ON THE SITE
 PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN.
 SEE COMMENT #3 ABOVE. PLACE A DOTTED LINE ON PLANS 5
 FEET FROM PROPERTY LINE AND LABEL AS LANDSCAPE BUFFER.
  
 6. SATISFIED. ALL MISSING OR DEAD SHRUBS MUST BE
 REPLACED IN ALL BUFFER HEDGES AS REQUIRED. ADD A NOTE
 TO THE PLAN.
  
 7. SATISFIED. MODIFY THE PLANT LIST TO ADD COLUMNS FOR
 NATIVE PLANT AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVELS TO PROVIDE
 EASIER REFERENCE.
  
 8. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ADD RELOCATED TREES TO THE
 PLANT LIST AND COUNT THEM TOWARD THE REQUIRED TREES.
 PROVIDE THE EXACT BREAKDOWN OF PALMS AND TREES ON THE
 PLANT LIST.
  
 9. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE REQUIRED FOUNDATION PLANTING
 TO 30 PERCENT REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-443(E)(1).
  
 10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW ALL REQUIRED CURBS
 ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPE AREAS PER SECTION 94-443 (C)(5).
 THERE APPEAR TO BE AREAS THAT ARE NOT CURBED. LANDSCAPE
 DIVIDER STRIPS CAN HAVE CURBS INSTEAD OF WHEEL STOPS TO
 INCREASE THE LANDSCAPE AREA FOR THE TREES. IF DRAINAGE
 IS A CONCERN, THEY CAN BE DESIGNED TO ROUTE WATER INTO
 THE LANDSCAPE AREAS.
 THERE ARE AREAS WITH EXISTING TREES THAT APPEAR TO HAVE
 THE PAVEMENT AND CURBS TOO CLOSE TO THE BASE OF TREES.
  
 11. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE
 PARKING AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS
 AND LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE
 WITH SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4).
 NEW PAVED AREAS NEED TO MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS, SEE
 FIGURE XIV-1 LANDSCAPE AREAS FOR PARKING LOTS IN
 SECTION 94-443(C)(3) FOR THE AREAS THAT QUALIFY AS
 INTERIOR LANDSCAPING FOR VEHICULAR USE AREA.
 PROVIDE AS A LARGER 1:20 SCALE PLAN FOR REVIEW.
  
 12. NOT SATISFIED. ALL NEW OR ALTERED ROWS OF PARKING
 MUST HAVE TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS MEETING THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A. FOR LANDSCAPE
 AREA WIDTH OF 8 FEET INSIDE CURB FOR THE FULL LENGTH OF
 THE PARKING SPACE. THE REQUIRED TERMINAL ISLANDS SHADE
 TREES ARE MISSING WHERE THE EXISTING PARKING AREA IS
 BEING ABBREVIATED, AND SOME ARE NOT CLEAR TO IDENTIFY
 THE QUALIFYING TREE. REVISE PLAN TO MEET REQUIREMENTS.
 REQUEST A WAIVER IF REQUIREMENTS CANNOT BE MET AND
 PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION.
  
 13. SATISFIED. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE
 CHART TO THE CURRENT CODE AND PROVIDE THE MINIMUM 50
 POINTS PER SECTION 94-442(G) BASED ON THE PLANT LIST
 AND ITEMS THAT QUALIFY. SOME WORDING AND PERCENTAGES
 ARE NOT CORRECT.
  
 14. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING
 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH
 LANDSCAPING.
 LIGHTING LOCATIONS SHOWN MAY CONFLICT WITH EXISTING
 TREE CANOPY, CONSIDERATION SHOULD BE MADE TO ADJUST
 POLE HEIGHTS TO BELOW THE TREE CANOPY TO BE MORE
 EFFICIENT WITH LIGHTING AND AVOID ADDING MAINTENANCE
 COSTS FOR TREE PRUNING.
  
 15. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THERE APPEAR TO BE CONFLICTS
 IN MANY LOCATIONS BETWEEN TREES AND DRAINAGE LINES,
 WATER AND SEWER LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. ADJUST
 LOCATIONS OF TREES OR UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE
 CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
 THERE ARE STILL SOME CONFLICTS WHERE WATER LINES ARE IN
 DIRECT CONFLICT WITH NEW TREE PLACEMENT AND EXISTING
 TREES.
 .
 16. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND SCREENING FOR ALL
 ABOVE GROUND UTILITY VALVES, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS, A/C
 UNITS, AND FPL TRANSFORMERS.
  
 17. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT
 BARRIERS REQUIRED TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES AND PROVIDE
 A ROOT BARRIER DETAIL.
  
 18. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF
 PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 12/5/19:
 19. CORRECT THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN TO SHOW TREE #216
 FINAL LOCATION, AS TREE #53 IS LABELED IN TWO
 LOCATIONS.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-09-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 10-09-2019 Time 16:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 10-09-2019 Time 16:17 Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-09 16:17:39FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: FIRST BAPTIST CSPD
 OCTOBER 9, 2019
 MINOR SUBDIVISION Z19090011: NO COMMENTS.
 FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT Z19090012: NO COMMENTS.
 REZONING TO CSPD Z19090013
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PROVIDE THE AMOUNT OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED OPEN
 SPACE AND LANDSCAPE AREA ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN MEETING
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF 50 PERCENT FOR CSPD ZONING PER
 SECTION 94-203.
  
 2. SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR MINIMUM SHADE TREE AND
 FLOWERING TREE REQUIREMENTS PER SECTION 94-443(C)(2)B.
 BASED ON THE 50 PERCENT REQUIRED FOR CSPD ZONING.
  
  
 3. SHOW ALL CALCULATIONS FOR THE REQUIRED TREES FOR
 BUFFER SEGMENTS ON A PERIMETER BUFFER REQUIREMENT CHART
 INCLUDING LINEAR FOOTAGE OF ALL PROPERTY LINE SEGMENTS.
  
 4. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE BUFFER ALONG VILLAGE
 BOULEVARD WITH ACCESS DRIVEWAYS TO SHOW THEY DO NOT
 EXCEED 25% INTERRUPTION FOR VEHICULAR ACCESS AS
 REQUIRED BY SECTION 94-443(B)(2).
  
 5. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER
 PLANTINGS ALONG ALL PROPERTY LINES WITH THE REQUIRED
 TREES OR NUMBER OF SUBSTITUTE PALMS PER CURRENT CODE
 REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(D). INDICATE THE
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER LOCATIONS ON THE SITE PLAN AND
 LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 6. ALL MISSING OR DEAD SHRUBS MUST BE REPLACED IN ALL
 BUFFER HEDGES AS REQUIRED. ADD A NOTE TO THE PLAN.
  
 7. MODIFY THE PLANT LIST TO ADD COLUMNS FOR NATIVE
 PLANT AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVELS TO PROVIDE EASIER
 REFERENCE.
  
 8. ADD RELOCATED TREES TO THE PLANT LIST AND COUNT THEM
 TOWARD THE REQUIRED TREES.
  
 9. CORRECT THE REQUIRED FOUNDATION PLANTING TO 30
 PERCENT REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-443(E)(1).
  
 10. SHOW ALL REQUIRED CURBS ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPE AREAS
 PER SECTION 94-443 (C)(5). THERE APPEAR TO BE AREAS
 THAT ARE NOT CURBED. LANDSCAPE DIVIDER STRIPS CAN HAVE
 CURBS INSTEAD OF WHEEL STOPS TO INCREASE THE LANDSCAPE
 AREA FOR THE TREES. IF DRAINAGE IS A CONCERN, THEY CAN
 BE DESIGNED TO ROUTE WATER INTO THE LANDSCAPE AREAS.
  
 11. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING AREA SURFACE
 CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND LANDSCAPE AREAS
 PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 94-443
 (C)(3) AND (4).
 NEW PAVED AREAS NEED TO MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS, SEE
 FIGURE XIV-1 LANDSCAPE AREAS FOR PARKING LOTS IN
 SECTION 94-443(C)(3) FOR THE AREAS THAT QUALIFY AS
 INTERIOR LANDSCAPING FOR VEHICULAR USE AREA.
  
 12. ALL NEW OR ALTERED ROWS OF PARKING MUST HAVE
 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF
 SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A. FOR LANDSCAPE AREA WIDTH OF 8
 FEET INSIDE CURB FOR THE FULL LENGTH OF THE PARKING
 SPACE. THE REQUIRED TERMINAL ISLANDS SHADE TREES ARE
 MISSING WHERE THE EXISTING PARKING AREA IS BEING
 ABBREVIATED, AND SOME ARE NOT CLEAR TO IDENTIFY THE
 QUALIFYING TREE. REVISE PLAN TO MEET REQUIREMENTS.
  
 13. UPDATE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE CHART TO THE
 CURRENT CODE AND PROVIDE THE MINIMUM 50 POINTS PER
 SECTION 94-442(G) BASED ON THE PLANT LIST AND ITEMS
 THAT QUALIFY. SOME WORDING AND PERCENTAGES ARE NOT
 CORRECT.
  
 14. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN
 TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
  
 15. THERE APPEAR TO BE CONFLICTS IN MANY LOCATIONS
 BETWEEN TREES AND DRAINAGE LINES, WATER AND SEWER LINES
 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. ADJUST LOCATIONS OF TREES OR
 UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
 .
 16. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND SCREENING FOR ALL ABOVE
 GROUND UTILITY VALVES, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS, A/C UNITS,
 AND FPL TRANSFORMERS.
  
 17. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS REQUIRED TO
 PROTECT UTILITY LINES AND PROVIDE A ROOT BARRIER
 DETAIL.
  
 18. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT
 SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL
 ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT
 SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF
 SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA
 WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA
 LANDSCAPES.
  
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 2 Status P Date 12-04-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 12-04-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 12-04-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-12-04 15:33:16NO FURTHER COMMENTS.
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 10-08-2019 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 10-08-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-08 15:04:21 
 - FOR A FREESTANDING SITE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, THE
 ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST REVISION OF CITY
 OF WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE
 ENCLOSURE STANDARD, CG-8.
 - PLEASE PROVIE A DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM
 PICK UP
  
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-08-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 10-08-2019 Time 16:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 10-08-2019 Time 16:49 Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-08 16:49:08THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
 MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. ADD THE CONVERSION EQUATION BETWEEN NAVD1988 AND
 NGVD1929 VERTICAL DATUMS TO THE SURVEY AND ENGINEERING
 PLANS.
  
 2. POLLUTANT RETARDANT BAFFLES (PRB'S) SHOULD BE USED
 IN ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES CONNECTED TO EXFILTRATION
 TRENCH.
  
 3. IDENTIFY WHICH DRAINAGE STRUCTURE WILL BE THE
 CONTROL STRUCTURE.
  
 4. DRAINAGE EASEMENT SHOLD BE OBTAINED FOR OUTFALL PIPE
 CROSSING THE APARTMENTS? PARCEL.
  
 5. SHOW AND LABEL THE PERIMETER BERM ALONG THE PROPERTY
 BOUNDARIES. PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION DETAIL OF THE
 PERIMETER BERM.
  
 6. PROVIDE GRADING, CONTOURS AND/OR CROSS SECTION(S) OF
 THE PERVIOUS AREA NEAR STRUCTURE S-7.
  
 7. PROVIDE CROSS SECTION(S) OR GRADING/CONTOURS OF THE
 PROPOSED DETENTION AREA.
  
 8. LIST VERTICAL DATUM AND CONVERSION EQUATION ON EACH
 SHEET CONTAINING ELEVATION INFORMATION.
  
 9. CLARIFY THE MINIMUM BERM ELEVATION INFORMATION IN
 THE TABLE ON SHEET C-140.
  
 10. SHOW MILL AND RESURFACE LIMITS FOR THE TRENCH CUTS
 ON VILLAGE BLVD.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
 THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS
 CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE
 ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED
 WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP PRIOR TO STARTING
 CONSTRUCTION.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 4 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 02-26-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-02-26 13:37:50SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
 1. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) IS REQUIRED TO BE
 CONSISTENT WITH ALL ELEMENTS OF THE CITY'S
 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. PER THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT, CONSTRUCT A 12-FOOT SIDEWALK ON
 VILLAGE BOULEVARD ALONG SITE FRONTAGE. THE COST
 ESTIMATE FOR THE PROPOSED IN-LIEU PAYMENT DOES NOT
 APPEAR TO INCLUDE DEMOLITION, MOT, MOBILIZATION,
 STABILIZATION AND UTILITY ADJUSTMENT WHICH MAY BE
 ESSENTIAL TO THE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT.
  
  
 CONDITIONS:
 1. DEVELOPMENT ON THIS 5.53-ACRE PARCEL WITH THE
 PROPOSED COMMUNITY SERVICE FLU DESIGNATION WOULD BE
 RESTRICTED TO GENERATE NO MORE THAN 1,735 WEEKDAY DAILY
 EXTERNAL TRIPS OR 173 WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL TRIPS
 WHEN EVALUATED USING THE LATEST PALM BEACH COUNTY TRIP
 GENERATION RATES PER THE FLU AMENDMENT TRAFFIC
 ANALYSIS.
  
  
 SHING TSOI
 CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
 561-494-1141
 [email protected]
 (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS)
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 02-03-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-02-03 15:45:31SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
 1. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) IS REQUIRED TO BE
 CONSISTENT WITH ALL ELEMENTS OF THE CITY?S
 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY?S
 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT, CONSTRUCT A
 12-FOOT SIDEWALK ON VILLAGE BOULEVARD ALONG SITE
 FRONTAGE.
  
 CONDITIONS:
 1. THE FLU AMENDMENT WILL BE VOLUNTARILY RESTRICTED TO
 A FAR OF 0.23 PER THE FLU AMENDMENT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS OR
 AS REVISED BASED ON THE REVISED FLU AMENDMENT TRAFFIC
 ANALYSIS.
  
  
  
 SHING TSOI
 CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
 561-494-1141
 [email protected]
 (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS)
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 11-27-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-11-27 17:07:36FLU AMENDMENT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS COMMENTS:
 1. THE GENERALIZED SERVICE VOLUMES FOR VILLAGE
 BOULEVARD SHOWN IN TABLE 8 ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE
 VOLUMES PUBLISHED IN PALM BEACH COUNTY?S TPS. PLEASE
 VERIFY AND REVISE. ALSO, PLEASE USE THE LATEST ADOPTED
 2040 COST FEASIBLE MODEL VOLUMES (SERPM 7.0 ADJUSTED
 VOLUMES) FROM PALM BEACH TPA DATED 8/17/2016.
 2. IN TABLE 6, THE COMMITTED TRAFFIC SHOWN DOES NOT
 APPEAR TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE INFORMATION PROVIDED
 IN THE APPENDIX. PLEASE VERIFY. IF COMMITTED
 INFORMATION ON VILLAGE BOULEVARD FROM THE COUNTY?S TPS
 DATABASE IS USED, PLEASE INCLUDE IN THE APPENDIX.
 3. PLEASE REVISE THE TYPO IN THE TABLE ENTRY ?MAX
 PROPOSED FLU - EXISTING FLU (SHORT-TERM ANALYSIS)?
 WHICH SHOULD SAY ?LONG-TERM ANALYSIS? IN TABLE 3.
 SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
 4. INCLUDE THE REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING IN THE SITE
 DATA TABLE AND INDICATE THE NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING
 SPACES REQUIRED.
 5. THE RESPONSE INDICATED THAT THE EXISTING SHADE TREES
 AND PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION ARE INNOVATIVE ELEMENTS FOR
 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) IN THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN.
 HOWEVER, THESE SHADE TREES AND SIDEWALK ON VILLAGE
 BOULEVARD ARE EXISTING ELEMENTS. PD IS INTENDED FOR
 DEVELOPMENTS WITH INNOVATIVE DESIGNS AND IS REQUIRED TO
 BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL ELEMENTS OF CITY?S COMPREHENSIVE
 PLAN. PLEASE IDENTIFY INNOVATIVE DESIGN ELEMENTS
 ASSOCIATED WITH THIS CSPD.
 6. CONSTRUCT 12-FOOT SIDEWALK WITH 6-FOOT LANDSCAPE
 BUFFER AND SHADE TREES ON VILLAGE BOULEVARD ALONG SITE
 FRONTAGE. IT APPEARS THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 RELOCATED SHADE TREES ARE SET BACK APPROXIMATELY 22
 FEET FROM THE CURB. ALSO, CONSIDER CONSTRUCTING THE
 SIDEWALK AROUND THE SHADE TREES AND UTILITIES AS IT
 APPEARS THERE ARE 24 FEET OF SPACE BETWEEN THE PARKING
 SPACES AND SHADE TREES
 CONDITIONS:
 1. THE FLU AMENDMENT WILL BE VOLUNTARILY RESTRICTED TO
 A FAR OF 0.317 PER THE FLU AMENDMENT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
 OR AS REVISED BASED ON THE REVISED FLU AMENDMENT
 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS.
  
  
 SHING TSOI
 CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
 561-494-1141
 [email protected]
 (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS)
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 10-08-2019 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-08 16:45:55FLU AMENDMENT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS COMMENTS:
 1. PROVIDE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOR FUTURE LANE USE
 AMENDMENT FOR THE CHURCH SITE.
 SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
 2. PROVIDE TURNAROUND SPACE FOR THE DEAD-END PARKING
 NORTHWEST OF THE CHURCH.
 3. REDUCE DRIVEWAY WIDTH TO 24 FEET OR LESS.
 4. PROVIDE CROSS VEHICULAR ACCESS BETWEEN THE CHURCH
 AND THE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF
 THE SITE, AND CROSS PEDESTRIAN ACCESSES ALONG THE EAST
 AND NORTH SIDES OF THE SITE.
 5. INCLUDE THE REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING IN THE SITE
 DATA TABLE AND SITE PLAN.
 6. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) IS INTENDED FOR
 DEVELOPMENTS WITH INNOVATIVE DESIGNS AND IS REQUIRED TO
 BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL ELEMENTS OF CITY?S COMPREHENSIVE
 PLAN. PLEASE IDENTIFY INNOVATIVE DESIGN ELEMENTS
 ASSOCIATED WITH THIS CSPD.
 7. CONSTRUCT 12-FOOT SIDEWALK WITH 6-FOOT LANDSCAPE
 BUFFER AND SHADE TREES ON VILLAGE BOULEVARD ALONG SITE
 FRONTAGE.
 8. SIDEWALK SHOULD MAINTAIN THE SAME LEVEL AS THE
 DRIVEWAYS.
  
 SHING TSOI
 CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
 561-494-1141
 [email protected]
 (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS)
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 01-30-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 01-30-2020 Time 10:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 01-30-2020 Time 10:01 Sent To  
Notes
2020-01-30 10:01:49PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 01.29.2020
 PROJECT NO.: Z19090013
 CASE NO.: PB 1841A
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - WHAT IS THE BASIS FOR
 USING 9-FOOT PARKING SPACES? IF EACH SPACE WERE REDUCED
 TO THE CODE-REQUIRED MINIMUM OF 8 FEET 6 INCHES, A
 SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF LANDSCAPE AREA COULD BE
 REINTRODUCED BACK INTO THE SITE.
  
 1.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - AS THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A
 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND IS ATTEMPTING TO USE
 "LANDSCAPING" AS AN INNVOATE FEATURE, STAFF IS
 CONSIDERING A CONDITION OF APPROVAL THAT WOULD PROVIDE
 FOR THE REDUCED SIZE OF THE PARKING STALLS.
  
 2. [ SATISFIED ] - A 5-FOOT WIDE TERMINAL ISLAND IS
 REQUIRED AT THE NORTH END OF THE FIRST ROW OF PARKING
 (ROW OF 6 SPACES) THAT?S LOCATED ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF
 THE SOUTH EAST ACCESS DRIVE.
  
 3. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - WHAT IS THE BASIS FOR
 HAVING TWO (2) DRIVE-AISLES (EACH 24-FEET WIDE) WITHIN
 SUCH CLOSE PROXIMITY TO ONE ANOTHER (NORTHEAST OF THE
 EXISTING LIFT STATION)? COULD ONE (1) OF THESE BE
 ELIMINATED OR OTHERWISE BE RECONFIGURED TO REDUCE THE
 AMOUNT OF PAVEMENT?
  
 3.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - WHY IS SO MUCH PAVEMENT BEING
 PROVIDED FOR THE TURN-AROUND AREA?
  
 4. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - STAFF WOULD LIKE TO
 DISCUSS THE POSSIBILITY OF HAVING SOME OF THE PARKING
 BE CONSTRUCTED AS GRASS PARKING.
  
 4.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - AS THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A
 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND IS ATTEMPTING TO USE
 "LANDSCAPING" AS AN INNVOATE FEATURE, STAFF IS
 CONSIDERING A CONDITION OF APPROVAL THAT WOULD PROVIDE
 FOR A PORTION OF THE PARKING BEING CONSTRUCTED AS GRASS
 PARKING. OTHER THAN A STATEMENT FROM THE CHURCH, NO
 STUDIES HAVE BEEN PROVIDED SHOWING HOW MUCH PARKING IS
 ACTUALLY BEING USED TODAY AT VARIOUS TIMES, ETC.
  
 5. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - THE TURN-AROUND IN THE
 FIRST BAY OF DEAD-END PARKING IS DIMENSIONED AS ONLY
 BEING 8 FEET WIDE, AND DOES NOT HAVE ANY FORM OF FLARE
 TO ALLOW MANEUVERABILITY OUT OF THE TURN-AROUND SPACE.
  
 5.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - WHY IS SO MUCH PAVEMENT BEING
 PROVIDED FOR THE TURN-AROUND AREA?
  
 6. [ SATISFIED ] - THE TURN-AROUND IN THE LAST BAY OF
 DEAD-END PARKING DOES NOT HAVE ANY FORM OF FLARE TO
 ALLOW MANEUVERABILITY OUT OF THE TURN-AROUND SPACE.
  
 7. [ SATISFIED ] - A 5-FOOT WIDE TERMINAL ISLAND IS
 REQUIRED AT THE END OF THE FIRST BAY OF DEAD-END
 PARKING; THE PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK IS ENCROACHING
 INTO THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE ISLAND.
  
 8. [ SATISFIED ] - PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THE ROUTE SHOWN
 FOR THE GARBAGE TRUCK IS ACCURATE. AS SHOWN, THE TRUCK
 WOULD BE GOING SOUTHBOUND, BUT THEN HEAD NORTHBOUND
 AFTER SERVICING THE SITE. FOR THE TRUCK TO CONTINUE
 SOUTHBOUND, IT WOULD HAVE TO MAKE A U-TURN.
  
 9. [ SATISFIED ] - DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE
 BICYCLE PARKING SHOWING THE STYLE OF THE PROPOSED RACK
 AS WELL AS DIMENSIONS FOR PLACEMENT, ETC. THE STYLE AND
 DIMENSIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY?S REQUIREMENTS
 (CONTACT ME FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, IF NECESSARY).
 RESPONSE STATES THAT A DETAIL WAS PROVIDED ON SHEET
 C-121, BUT NO DETAIL IS SHOWN.
  
 10. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - UTILITY LETTER FROM COMCAST IS
 STILL OUTSTANDING.
  
 11. [ NOT SATISIFED ] - PLEASE CLARIFY WHY THE SITE
 PLAN INDICATES THAT ONLY 87 PARKING SPACES ARE
 REQUIRED. THE SITE DATA TABLE SHOULD SHOW THE
 CALCULATIONS (# OF SEATS, SQUARE FOOTAGE, ETC.).
  
 11.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - SITE DATA TABLE HAS NOT BEEN
 UPDATED TO REFLECT REQUIRED PARKING CALCULATION (# OF
 SEATS, SQUARE FOOTAGET, ETC.)
  
 12. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - THE WAIVER REQUEST TABLE
 INDICATES THAT A 10 FOOT REAR SETBACK WAIVER IS
 PROPOSED. THE REGULATIONS REQUIRE 15 FOOT REAR SETBACK
 AND 10 FEET IS PROPOSED; THIS IS A 5 FOOT WAIVER, NOT
 10 FOOT.
  
 12.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - THE WAIVER TABLE HAS NOT BEEN
 UPDATED TO REFLECT A 5 FOOT WAIVER REQUEST.
  
 13. [ SATISFIED ] - THE BUILDING SETBACK TABLE ON SHEET
 C-120 INDICATES THAT A 15 FOOT FRONT SETBACK IS
 REQUIRED; HOWEVER, SEC. 94-203 STATES THAT A 25 FOOT
 FRONT SETBACK IS REQUIRED. PLEASE ADJUST ACCORDINGLY.
  
 14. [ SATISFIED ] - THE BUILDING SETBACK TABLE ON SHEET
 C-120 INDICATES THAT A 15 FOOT SETBACK IS REQUIRED ON A
 SIDE STREET; HOWEVER, SEC. 94-203 STATES THAT A 25 FOOT
 CORNER SETBACK IS REQUIRED. PLEASE ADJUST ACCORDINGLY.
  
 15. [ SATISFIED ] - PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THE PROVIDED
 LOT COVERAGE IN THE SITE DATA TABLE ON SHEET C-120; IT
 SEEMS THAT THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT IS LARGER THAN WHAT
 IS BEING INDICATED.
  
 16. [ SATISFIED ] - THE PLANS INDICATE THAT THE
 EXISTING BUILDING IS TWO (2) STORIES IN HEIGHT, BUT THE
 FAR SHOWN IN THE SITE DATA TABLE MATCHES THE BUILDING
 COVERAGE THAT IS PROVIDED, WHICH WOULD INDICATE THAT IT
 IS A ONE (1) STORY BUILDING. PLEASE CLARIFY.
  
 17. [ SATISFIED ] - THE PROPOSED CROSS-ACCESS EASEMENT
 SHOWN ON SHEET C-120 DOES NOT SEEM TO BE SUFFICIENT
 WIDTH AT THE POINT WHERE IT TERMINATES AT THE NORTH
 GATE OF THE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
  
 18. [ PARTIALLY SATISIFED ] - THE SITE DATA TABLE ON
 SHEET C-120 SHALL INDICATE THE NUMBER OF BICYCLE
 PARKING SPACES REQUIRED, AS WELL AS THE NUMBER
 PROPOSED.
  
 18.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - DATA TABLE SHOULD INDICATE THE
 CALUCATION USED FOR BICYCLE PARKING (1 BICYCLE SPACE
 PER 20 PARKING SPACES).
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X
 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-06-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 01-06-2020 Time 16:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 01-06-2020 Time 16:10 Sent To  
Notes
2020-01-06 16:10:48PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 01.06.2020
 PROJECT NO.: Z19090013
 CASE NO.: PB 1841A
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. WHAT IS THE BASIS FOR USING 9-FOOT PARKING SPACES?
 IF EACH SPACE WERE REDUCED TO THE CODE-REQUIRED MINIMUM
 OF 8 FEET 6 INCHES, A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF LANDSCAPE
 AREA COULD BE REINTRODUCED BACK INTO THE SITE.
  
 2. A 5-FOOT WIDE TERMINAL ISLAND IS REQUIRED AT THE
 NORTH END OF THE FIRST ROW OF PARKING (ROW OF 6 SPACES)
 THAT?S LOCATED ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE SOUTH EAST
 ACCESS DRIVE.
  
 3. WHAT IS THE BASIS FOR HAVING TWO (2) DRIVE-AISLES
 (EACH 24-FEET WIDE) WITHIN SUCH CLOSE PROXIMITY TO ONE
 ANOTHER (NORTHEAST OF THE EXISTING LIFT STATION)? COULD
 ONE (1) OF THESE BE ELIMINATED OR OTHERWISE BE
 RECONFIGURED TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF PAVEMENT?
  
 4. STAFF WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS THE POSSIBILITY OF
 HAVING SOME OF THE PARKING BE CONSTRUCTED AS GRASS
 PARKING.
  
 5. THE TURN-AROUND IN THE FIRST BAY OF DEAD-END PARKING
 IS DIMENSIONED AS ONLY BEING 8 FEET WIDE, AND DOES NOT
 HAVE ANY FORM OF FLARE TO ALLOW MANEUVERABILITY OUT OF
 THE TURN-AROUND SPACE.
  
 6. THE TURN-AROUND IN THE LAST BAY OF DEAD-END PARKING
 DOES NOT HAVE ANY FORM OF FLARE TO ALLOW
 MANEUVERABILITY OUT OF THE TURN-AROUND SPACE.
  
 7. A 5-FOOT WIDE TERMINAL ISLAND IS REQUIRED AT THE END
 OF THE FIRST BAY OF DEAD-END PARKING; THE PROPOSED
 CONCRETE SIDEWALK IS ENCROACHING INTO THE REQUIRED
 LANDSCAPE ISLAND.
  
 8. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THE ROUTE SHOWN FOR THE GARBAGE
 TRUCK IS ACCURATE. AS SHOWN, THE TRUCK WOULD BE GOING
 SOUTHBOUND, BUT THEN HEAD NORTHBOUND AFTER SERVICING
 THE SITE. FOR THE TRUCK TO CONTINUE SOUTHBOUND, IT
 WOULD HAVE TO MAKE A U-TURN.
  
 9. DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE BICYCLE PARKING
 SHOWING THE STYLE OF THE PROPOSED RACK AS WELL AS
 DIMENSIONS FOR PLACEMENT, ETC. THE STYLE AND DIMENSIONS
 SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY?S REQUIREMENTS (CONTACT ME
 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, IF NECESSARY). RESPONSE
 STATES THAT A DETAIL WAS PROVIDED ON SHEET C-121, BUT
 NO DETAIL IS SHOWN.
  
 10. UTILITY LETTER FROM COMCAST IS STILL OUTSTANDING.
  
 11. PLEASE CLARIFY WHY THE SITE PLAN INDICATES THAT
 ONLY 87 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED. THE SITE DATA
 TABLE SHOULD SHOW THE CALCULATIONS (# OF SEATS, SQUARE
 FOOTAGE, ETC.).
  
 12. THE WAIVER REQUEST TABLE INDICATES THAT A 10 FOOT
 REAR SETBACK WAIVER IS PROPOSED. THE REGULATIONS
 REQUIRE 15 FOOT REAR SETBACK AND 10 FEET IS PROPOSED;
 THIS IS A 5 FOOT WAIVER, NOT 10 FOOT.
  
 13. THE BUILDING SETBACK TABLE ON SHEET C-120 INDICATES
 THAT A 15 FOOT FRONT SETBACK IS REQUIRED; HOWEVER, SEC.
 94-203 STATES THAT A 25 FOOT FRONT SETBACK IS REQUIRED.
 PLEASE ADJUST ACCORDINGLY.
  
 14. THE BUILDING SETBACK TABLE ON SHEET C-120 INDICATES
 THAT A 15 FOOT SETBACK IS REQUIRED ON A SIDE STREET;
 HOWEVER, SEC. 94-203 STATES THAT A 25 FOOT CORNER
 SETBACK IS REQUIRED. PLEASE ADJUST ACCORDINGLY.
  
 15. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THE PROVIDED LOT COVERAGE IN
 THE SITE DATA TABLE ON SHEET C-120; IT SEEMS THAT THE
 BUILDING FOOTPRINT IS LARGER THAN WHAT IS BEING
 INDICATED.
  
 16. THE PLANS INDICATE THAT THE EXISTING BUILDING IS
 TWO (2) STORIES IN HEIGHT, BUT THE FAR SHOWN IN THE
 SITE DATA TABLE MATCHES THE BUILDING COVERAGE THAT IS
 PROVIDED, WHICH WOULD INDICATE THAT IT IS A ONE (1)
 STORY BUILDING. PLEASE CLARIFY.
  
 17. THE PROPOSED CROSS-ACCESS EASEMENT SHOWN ON SHEET
 C-120 DOES NOT SEEM TO BE SUFFICIENT WIDTH AT THE POINT
 WHERE IT TERMINATES AT THE NORTH GATE OF THE
 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
  
 18. THE SITE DATA TABLE ON SHEET C-120 SHALL INDICATE
 THE NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED, AS WELL
 AS THE NUMBER PROPOSED.
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X
 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE FEBRUARY 18, 2020,
 PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE
 SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED
 DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, JANUARY 17, 2020.
  
 G) TO BE PLACED ON THE FEBRUARY 18, 2020, PLANNING
 BOARD AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO
 LATER THAN FEBRUARY 3, 2020. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM, AND
 BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
 CITY?S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; SUCH
 REQUIREMENTS ARE ALSO PROVIDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE
 PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED ABOVE.
  
 H) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT
 DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE
 COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status P Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 10-09-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pgreilic Date 10-09-2019 Time 16:58 Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-09 16:59:58CASE NUMBER: PB 1841 & 1841A (Z19090012/3)
 PROJECT NAME: FAMILY CHURCH REZONING AND FUTURE LAND
 USE MAP AMENDMENT
 ADDRESS: 3600 VILLAGE BOULEVARD
  
 ---CONTACT PAUL GREILICH @ (561) 822-1443 OR JOHN ROACH
 @ 561-822-1448
 ---PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
 ---WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF
 ELEVEN (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN
 .PNG/.PDF FORMAT OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES
 ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF
 INFORMATION/PLANS TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
 ---PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS/THE PPRC MEETING (BY
 7/8/19), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY
 FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION.
 ---PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 1) PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION OF HOW THE APPLICATION AS
 PRESENTED MEETS THE INTENT OF SEC. 94-207(A)(1),
 INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES.
  
 2) PROVIDE A PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION (SIDEWALK AND
 ASSOCIATED STRIPING) ADJACENT TO DRIVE AISLE TO ENABLE
 INCREASED PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO THE SITE
  
 3) CONSIDER A SHARED PARKING STRATEGY WITH THE PROPOSED
 NEIGHBORING DEVELOPMENT TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF PARKING
 SPACE ON SITE.
  
 4) THE PROPOSED PLAN INDICATES A TOTAL OF 163 SPACES
 ARE BEING PROVIDED ABOVE WHAT IS REQUIRED BY CODE. HAS
 THE PARKING DEMAND AT THE CHURCH HISTORICALLY BEEN
 COMMENSURATE TO THE 250 EXISTING SPACES? APPLICANT TO
 EXAMINE A POTENTIAL REDUCTION TO REDUCE IMPERVIOUS
 SURFACE, RUNOFF.
  
 5) ADD REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING SPACES AND DISTRIBUTE
 THROUGHOUT THE SITE AND INCLUDE CITY-STANDARD BIKE RACK
 DETAIL
  
 6) PROVIDE LETTERS FROM ALL OF THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC
 UTILITIES CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT
 ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE
 WITH THE PROVISION OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, FPU, FPL,
 AND COMCAST.
  
 7) ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, INCLUDING NEW
 CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR IMPROVEMENT OF AN
 EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS
 ARE EQUAL OR GREATER THAN $750,000 IS SUBJECT TO THE
 ART IN PUBLIC PLACES REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 78,
 ARTICLE V, OF THE CITY?S CODE OF ORDINANCES. CONTACT
 SYBILLE WELTER @ 561-822-1521 OR [email protected] FOR
 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved