Plan Review Details - Project Z19090009
Plan Review Stops For Project Z19090009
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 10-09-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 10-09-2019 Time 19:07 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 10-09-2019 Time 19:07 Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-09 19:10:47DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. THE ADDITION TO THE EXISTING BUILDING IS COVERED BY
 CHAPTER 11 OF THE FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING CODE. THE
 HEIGHT AND/OR AREA INCREASE DUE TO THE PROPOSED
 ADDITION SHALL NOT INCREASE THE TOTAL BUILDING HEIGHT
 AND/OR AREA BEYOND THAT ALLOWED UNDER THE APPLICABLE
 PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
 FOR THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION USED.
  
 3. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS,
 FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS,
 GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE,
 SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 4. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE ON
 THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status P Date 01-09-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 01-09-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 01-09-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-07-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 10-07-2019 Time   Rev Time  
Received By rrossano Date 10-07-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-07 11:15:171. THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF
 REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY
 AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND
 WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE
 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK
 BELOW: HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=
 ~\WPB_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION
 -FULL-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC0
 2A97B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF
 THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE
 FOUND HERE: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBL
 IC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
 2. CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH,
 FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08, ADOPTED
 SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)
 CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. SEC. 90-7.
 POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER SERVICE
 FACILITIES OF THE CITY.
 THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
 BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
 BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
 3. AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
 MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI
 CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL
 4. PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS
 OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES,
 INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND
 SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES,
 METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE
 SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING
 GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS,
 ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL
 INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER
 LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN
 VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
 PLEASE SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT
 MATERIAL. ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL
 EXISTING AND PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT,
 INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &
 TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL
 UTILITY CROSSINGS.
 5. CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY
 ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
 RIGHT OF WAY.
 6. PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE
 DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB
 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION).
 7. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED ADDITIONAL DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE,
 MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS
 SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008
 FOR WATER.
 8. SHOW VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION INFORMATION
 (NAVD 88 AND NGVD 29) ON ALL SHEETS.
 9. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF EXISTING AND REVISED
 PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED
 IMPACTED AREAS.
 10. COORDINATE WITH MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE
 SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING
 PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT
 HIM AT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]
 11. PROVIDE UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY
 PERSONNEL TO PROPOSED UTILITIES INCLUDING WATER METERS.
 12. PLEASE PROVIDE 10 FT. MIN. HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE
 BETWEEN PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER LINES.
 13. PLEASE PROVIDE INLET ELEVATIONS AT ANY PROPOSED
 MANHOLES.
 14. SPECIFY EXISTING SANITARY LINE MATERIAL IN RIGHT OF
 WAY.
 15. PLEASE SHOW VALVE SIZES AND LOCATIONS.
 16. LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE.
 17. PLEASE PROVIDE PROJECT ADDRESS ON PLANS.
 18. PLEASE ADD AND OR UPDATE CITY OF WPB STANDARD
 DETAILS.
 19. PLEASE CLARIFY LOCATION OF PROPOSED GENERATOR OVER
 EASEMENT ? MAY BE IN CONFLICT WITH EXISTING CITY WATER
 MAIN.
 20. PROPOSED DRIVEWAY CONNECTING TO NORTH PARCEL MAY BE
 IN CONFLICT WITH EXISTING CITY WATER MAIN.
 21. SHOW WATER MAIN IN EASEMENT THAT COULD BE IN
 CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED STORM ADJUSTMENTS.
 22. WILL DRIVEWAY BE GATED? PLEASE SHOW GATE DETAILS,
 FOOTPRINT/LAYOUT/DIMENSIONS ETC.
 23. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDRESS ON COVER SHEET.
 24. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL , PLEASE INCLUDE
 LATEST CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAILS IN PLANS.
 25. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES
 OF WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
 26. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING
 APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT
 SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING
 SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED
 LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
 27. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL PROVIDE SANITARY
 ELEVATIONS AT MANHOLE TIE-IN.
 28. PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING AND
 INCLUDE Z PERMIT NUMBER IN ALL CORRESPONDENCE.
  
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS.
  
 RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT
 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 10-03-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 10-03-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 10-03-2019 Time 16:32 Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-03 16:34:31THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE
 OCCUPANCY TYPE, PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 AND WHETHER IT IS MIXED OR SEPARATED OCCUPANCY.
  
 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE
 LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER
 SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED.
  
 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE
 BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND
 FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET
 OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER
 ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES.
  
 9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER
 THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY
 ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM,
 ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FS 61G AND
 SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PLAN.
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS SHALL BE PROVIDED THAT
 ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL DISTANCES, COMMON
 PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, EXIT SIGNS,
 EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A PUBLIC WAY, FIRE
 EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE SAFETY FEATURES
 AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE
 SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY
 DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 6 Status P Date 07-14-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 07-14-2020 Time 13:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 07-14-2020 Time 13:40 Sent To  
Notes
2020-07-14 13:41:20FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: MORSELIFE Z19090009
 JULY 14, 2020
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 PART A AUDITORIUM BUILDING:
 1. SATISFIED. THE EXISTING TREE PLAN AND DISPOSITION
 LIST ON SHEET L102B IS OUTDATED AND DOES NOT REFLECT
 WHAT CURRENTLY EXISTS ON SITE. SUPPLY A CURRENT PLAN
 AND IDENTIFY THE TREES WITHIN THE AFFECTED AREA ON THE
 TREE DISPOSITION TABULAR LIST TO DISCERN THEM FROM THE
 REST OF THE AREAS.
 THE LAST APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST BE THE BASE FOR
 THE TREE LOCATIONS, AND THEN THE TREES THAT ARE TO BE
 REMOVED OR RELOCATED ARE TO BE IDENTIFIED. THE APPROVED
 LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE NORTH PROPERTY SHOULD BE USED TO
 SHOW THE BUFFER TREES, AND THE ONES IDENTIFIED THAT ARE
 TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED. GENERATOR SIDEWALK APPEARS
 TO CONFLICT WITH SM#2.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CLEAR LOCATION OF WHERE ANY
 RELOCATED TREES AND PALMS WILL BE PLACED ON THE SITE ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
 SOME OF THE LABELED RELOCATIONS AND REPLACEMENTS ARE
 NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE LABELS ON THE EXISTING TREE
 PLAN. QV#1 AND QV#2 MUST BE SHOWN ON THE EXISTING TREE
 PLAN, AND REPLACEMENT LOCATIONS SHOULD ONLY BE SHOWN ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. QV3 IS SHOWN TWICE.
 ALL FINAL LOCATIONS FOR TREES ARE TO BE SHOWN ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN INCLUDING FOR THE NORTH PROPERTY.
  
 3. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. LIVE OAK TREES #5 AND #6 ARE LISTED FOR
 REMOVAL, BUT CONDITION WAS NOT SUPPLIED.
 EXPLANATION OF ADJUSTMENT TO AVOID GOOD TREES PROVIDED,
 BUT CONDITION MUST BE LISTED IN THE TREE DISPOSITION
 FOR ALL REMOVALS AND RELOCATIONS.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE PROPOSED
 ACCESS DRIVEWAY AND SHOW ANY REMOVAL OR REPLACEMENT OF
 TREES OR SHRUBS, INCLUDING THE NORTH PROPERTY.
 PLAN SUPPLIED FOR SOUTH PROPERTY, BUT NOTHING IS SHOWN
 FOR THE EXISTING BUFFER TREES ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTY
 TO THE NORTH. IF THIS IS TO BE SHOWN ON THE MAJOR
 AMENDMENT PLAN, INDICATE THIS ON THE SUBMITTED PLAN.
 CODE REQUIRES THE ADJACENT PROPERTY TREES WITHIN 10
 FEET OF THE PROPERTY LINE TO BE SHOWN ON THE PROPOSED
 PLAN PER SECTION 94-442(B)(2)Q.
 APPROVED AND EXISTING TREES FOR THE NORTH PROPERTY HAVE
 NOT BEEN SHOWN.
  
 5. SATISFIED. THE GENERATOR LOCATION DOES NOT SHOW
 DETAIL FOR THE LOCATION OF THE WALL DESCRIBED IN THE
 NARRATIVE. LOCATION OF ACCESS DOORS NEEDS TO BE SHOWN,
 AND THE HEDGE AND TREES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE
 ENCLOSURE NEED TO BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN.
 GENERATOR ENCLOSURE IS SHOWN CROSSING OVER THE PARCEL
 LINE, SEE COMMENT#4.
  
 6. SATISFIED. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT REMOVAL OF THE
 MATURE BUFFER TREES ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE THAT
 ARE PROVIDING SHADE FOR THE EXISTING PARKING AND
 PROVIDE ALL THE BENEFITS OF A MATURE TREE CANOPY. THE
 APPLICANT SHOULD LOOK AT ADJUSTING THE LOCATION OF THE
 GENERATOR TO MINIMIZE THE NEED TO RELOCATE TREES AND
 PRESERVE THE EXISTING TREES TO MEET THE INTENT OF
 SECTION 94-448.
 7. SATISFIED. INDICATE ALL CHANGES TO THE PLANT LIST
 WITH CLOUDING AND INDICATE THE LIMITS OF THE AFFECTED
 AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND SITE PLAN.
  
 PART B, GENERATOR AND CONNECTION ROAD:
  
 1. SATISFIED. THE HOMESAFE LANDSCAPE PLAN-1 WITH 4
 TREES INDICATED IN RED, 3 TO REMAIN AND I LIVE OAK TO
 BE REMOVED DOES NOT MATCH HOMESAFE LANDSCAPE PLAN-2.
 LA-2 MITIGATION LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES MATCH.
  
 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. ARBORIST LETTER SUPPLIED DOES NOT ADDRESS
 THE TREE CONDITIONS AS REQUESTED BUT ASKS FOR AN
 EXCEPTION BECAUSE OF THE TIME FRAME. THE LETTER ALSO
 REFERENCES 3 MAHOGANY TREES, BUT THE PLAN INDICATES
 ONLY 2 MAHOGANY TREES TO BE REMOVED, SM#3 AND SM#4.
 LIVE OAK TREES #5 AND #6 ARE LISTED FOR REMOVAL, AND
 LIVE OAK TREES #1 AND #3 ARE NOW LISTED FOR REMOVAL. IF
 TREES ARE TO BE REMOVED, THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL TREES
 REQUIRED.
  
 3. SATISFIED. IF THE 6 TREES IN COMMENT 3 ARE TO BE
 REMOVED, A DISPOSITION CHART MUST BE PROVIDED WITH THE
 CANOPY DIAMETERS AND CONDITION SUPPLIED. CANOPY
 MITIGATION MUST BE CALCULATED AND TOTALED. MITIGATION
 SUPPLIED MUST ALSO BE LISTED AND TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE
 PROVIDED.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. ELECTRICAL CONDUIT CONNECTING THE GENERATOR TO THE
 ELECTRIC PANEL SHALL BE INSTALLED IN A LOCATION AND
 MANNER TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE OF THE
 EXISTING TREES. THIS WOULD INCLUDE AVOIDING DIGGING
 LARGE TRENCHES WITHIN THE ROOT ZONE. OPTIONS SUCH AS
 RUNNING IT UNDER PAVEMENT OR DIRECTIONAL BORING SHOULD
 BE USED.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 5 Status F Date 04-29-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 04-29-2020 Time 16:52 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 04-29-2020 Time 16:52 Sent To  
Notes
2020-04-29 16:52:57FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: MORSELIFE Z19090009
 APRIL 29, 2020
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 PART A AUDITORIUM BUILDING:
 1. SATISFIED. THE EXISTING TREE PLAN AND DISPOSITION
 LIST ON SHEET L102B IS OUTDATED AND DOES NOT REFLECT
 WHAT CURRENTLY EXISTS ON SITE. SUPPLY A CURRENT PLAN
 AND IDENTIFY THE TREES WITHIN THE AFFECTED AREA ON THE
 TREE DISPOSITION TABULAR LIST TO DISCERN THEM FROM THE
 REST OF THE AREAS.
 THE LAST APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST BE THE BASE FOR
 THE TREE LOCATIONS, AND THEN THE TREES THAT ARE TO BE
 REMOVED OR RELOCATED ARE TO BE IDENTIFIED. THE APPROVED
 LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE NORTH PROPERTY SHOULD BE USED TO
 SHOW THE BUFFER TREES, AND THE ONES IDENTIFIED THAT ARE
 TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED. GENERATOR SIDEWALK APPEARS
 TO CONFLICT WITH SM#2.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CLEAR LOCATION OF WHERE ANY
 RELOCATED TREES AND PALMS WILL BE PLACED ON THE SITE ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
 SOME OF THE LABELED RELOCATIONS AND REPLACEMENTS ARE
 NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE LABELS ON THE EXISTING TREE
 PLAN. QV#1 AND QV#2 MUST BE SHOWN ON THE EXISTING TREE
 PLAN, AND REPLACEMENT LOCATIONS SHOULD ONLY BE SHOWN ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. QV3 IS SHOWN TWICE.
 ALL FINAL LOCATIONS FOR TREES ARE TO BE SHOWN ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN INCLUDING FOR THE NORTH PROPERTY.
  
 3. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. LIVE OAK TREES #5 AND #6 ARE LISTED FOR
 REMOVAL, BUT CONDITION WAS NOT SUPPLIED.
 EXPLANATION OF ADJUSTMENT TO AVOID GOOD TREES PROVIDED,
 BUT CONDITION MUST BE LISTED IN THE TREE DISPOSITION
 FOR ALL REMOVALS AND RELOCATIONS.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE PROPOSED
 ACCESS DRIVEWAY AND SHOW ANY REMOVAL OR REPLACEMENT OF
 TREES OR SHRUBS, INCLUDING THE NORTH PROPERTY.
 PLAN SUPPLIED FOR SOUTH PROPERTY, BUT NOTHING IS SHOWN
 FOR THE EXISTING BUFFER TREES ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTY
 TO THE NORTH. IF THIS IS TO BE SHOWN ON THE MAJOR
 AMENDMENT PLAN, INDICATE THIS ON THE SUBMITTED PLAN.
 CODE REQUIRES THE ADJACENT PROPERTY TREES WITHIN 10
 FEET OF THE PROPERTY LINE TO BE SHOWN ON THE PROPOSED
 PLAN PER SECTION 94-442(B)(2)Q.
 APPROVED AND EXISTING TREES FOR THE NORTH PROPERTY HAVE
 NOT BEEN SHOWN.
  
 5. SATISFIED. THE GENERATOR LOCATION DOES NOT SHOW
 DETAIL FOR THE LOCATION OF THE WALL DESCRIBED IN THE
 NARRATIVE. LOCATION OF ACCESS DOORS NEEDS TO BE SHOWN,
 AND THE HEDGE AND TREES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE
 ENCLOSURE NEED TO BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN.
 GENERATOR ENCLOSURE IS SHOWN CROSSING OVER THE PARCEL
 LINE, SEE COMMENT#4.
  
 6. SATISFIED. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT REMOVAL OF THE
 MATURE BUFFER TREES ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE THAT
 ARE PROVIDING SHADE FOR THE EXISTING PARKING AND
 PROVIDE ALL THE BENEFITS OF A MATURE TREE CANOPY. THE
 APPLICANT SHOULD LOOK AT ADJUSTING THE LOCATION OF THE
 GENERATOR TO MINIMIZE THE NEED TO RELOCATE TREES AND
 PRESERVE THE EXISTING TREES TO MEET THE INTENT OF
 SECTION 94-448.
 7. SATISFIED. INDICATE ALL CHANGES TO THE PLANT LIST
 WITH CLOUDING AND INDICATE THE LIMITS OF THE AFFECTED
 AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND SITE PLAN.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 PART B, GENERATOR AND CONNECTION ROAD:
  
 1. THE HOMESAFE LANDSCAPE PLAN-1 WITH 4 TREES INDICATED
 IN RED, 3 TO REMAIN AND I LIVE OAK TO BE REMOVED DOES
 NOT MATCH HOMESAFE LANDSCAPE PLAN-2. LA-2 MITIGATION
 LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES MATCH.
  
 2. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES IN GOOD
 CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED.
 ARBORIST LETTER SUPPLIED DOES NOT ADDRESS THE TREE
 CONDITIONS AS REQUESTED BUT ASKS FOR AN EXCEPTION
 BECAUSE OF THE TIME FRAME. THE LETTER ALSO REFERENCES 3
 MAHOGANY TREES, BUT THE PLAN INDICATES ONLY 2 MAHOGANY
 TREES TO BE REMOVED, SM#3 AND SM#4. LIVE OAK TREES #5
 AND #6 ARE LISTED FOR REMOVAL, AND LIVE OAK TREES #1
 AND #3 ARE NOW LISTED FOR REMOVAL. IF TREES ARE TO BE
 REMOVED, THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL TREES REQUIRED.
  
 3. IF THE 6 TREES IN COMMENT 3 ARE TO BE REMOVED, A
 DISPOSITION CHART MUST BE PROVIDED WITH THE CANOPY
 DIAMETERS AND CONDITION SUPPLIED. CANOPY MITIGATION
 MUST BE CALCULATED AND TOTALED. MITIGATION SUPPLIED
 MUST ALSO BE LISTED AND TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 03-27-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 03-27-2020 Time 11:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 03-27-2020 Time 11:42 Sent To  
Notes
2020-03-27 11:42:53FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: MORSELIFE Z19090009
 MARCH 27, 2020
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. THE EXISTING TREE PLAN AND DISPOSITION
 LIST ON SHEET L102B IS OUTDATED AND DOES NOT REFLECT
 WHAT CURRENTLY EXISTS ON SITE. SUPPLY A CURRENT PLAN
 AND IDENTIFY THE TREES WITHIN THE AFFECTED AREA ON THE
 TREE DISPOSITION TABULAR LIST TO DISCERN THEM FROM THE
 REST OF THE AREAS.
 THE LAST APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST BE THE BASE FOR
 THE TREE LOCATIONS, AND THEN THE TREES THAT ARE TO BE
 REMOVED OR RELOCATED ARE TO BE IDENTIFIED. THE APPROVED
 LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE NORTH PROPERTY SHOULD BE USED TO
 SHOW THE BUFFER TREES, AND THE ONES IDENTIFIED THAT ARE
 TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED. GENERATOR SIDEWALK APPEARS
 TO CONFLICT WITH SM#2.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CLEAR LOCATION OF WHERE ANY
 RELOCATED TREES AND PALMS WILL BE PLACED ON THE SITE ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
 SOME OF THE LABELED RELOCATIONS AND REPLACEMENTS ARE
 NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE LABELS ON THE EXISTING TREE
 PLAN. QV#1 AND QV#2 MUST BE SHOWN ON THE EXISTING TREE
 PLAN, AND REPLACEMENT LOCATIONS SHOULD ONLY BE SHOWN ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. QV3 IS SHOWN TWICE.
 ALL FINAL LOCATIONS FOR TREES ARE TO BE SHOWN ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN INCLUDING FOR THE NORTH PROPERTY.
  
 3. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. LIVE OAK TREES #5 AND #6 ARE LISTED FOR
 REMOVAL, BUT CONDITION WAS NOT SUPPLIED.
 EXPLANATION OF ADJUSTMENT TO AVOID GOOD TREES PROVIDED,
 BUT CONDITION MUST BE LISTED IN THE TREE DISPOSITION
 FOR ALL REMOVALS AND RELOCATIONS.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE PROPOSED
 ACCESS DRIVEWAY AND SHOW ANY REMOVAL OR REPLACEMENT OF
 TREES OR SHRUBS, INCLUDING THE NORTH PROPERTY.
 PLAN SUPPLIED FOR SOUTH PROPERTY, BUT NOTHING IS SHOWN
 FOR THE EXISTING BUFFER TREES ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTY
 TO THE NORTH. IF THIS IS TO BE SHOWN ON THE MAJOR
 AMENDMENT PLAN, INDICATE THIS ON THE SUBMITTED PLAN.
 CODE REQUIRES THE ADJACENT PROPERTY TREES WITHIN 10
 FEET OF THE PROPERTY LINE TO BE SHOWN ON THE PROPOSED
 PLAN PER SECTION 94-442(B)(2)Q.
 APPROVED AND EXISTING TREES FOR THE NORTH PROPERTY HAVE
 NOT BEEN SHOWN.
  
 5. SATISFIED. THE GENERATOR LOCATION DOES NOT SHOW
 DETAIL FOR THE LOCATION OF THE WALL DESCRIBED IN THE
 NARRATIVE. LOCATION OF ACCESS DOORS NEEDS TO BE SHOWN,
 AND THE HEDGE AND TREES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE
 ENCLOSURE NEED TO BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN.
 GENERATOR ENCLOSURE IS SHOWN CROSSING OVER THE PARCEL
 LINE, SEE COMMENT#4.
  
 6. SATISFIED. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT REMOVAL OF THE
 MATURE BUFFER TREES ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE THAT
 ARE PROVIDING SHADE FOR THE EXISTING PARKING AND
 PROVIDE ALL THE BENEFITS OF A MATURE TREE CANOPY. THE
 APPLICANT SHOULD LOOK AT ADJUSTING THE LOCATION OF THE
 GENERATOR TO MINIMIZE THE NEED TO RELOCATE TREES AND
 PRESERVE THE EXISTING TREES TO MEET THE INTENT OF
 SECTION 94-448.
 7. SATISFIED. INDICATE ALL CHANGES TO THE PLANT LIST
 WITH CLOUDING AND INDICATE THE LIMITS OF THE AFFECTED
 AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND SITE PLAN.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 02-28-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 02-28-2020 Time 13:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 02-28-2020 Time 13:45 Sent To  
Notes
2020-02-28 13:45:57FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: MORSELIFE Z19090009
 FEBRUARY 28, 2020
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS COMMENT WAS MISTAKENLY MARKED AS SATISFIED ON
 THE LAST REVIEW. NOT SATISFIED. THE EXISTING TREE PLAN
 AND DISPOSITION LIST ON SHEET L102B IS OUTDATED AND
 DOES NOT REFLECT WHAT CURRENTLY EXISTS ON SITE. SUPPLY
 A CURRENT PLAN AND IDENTIFY THE TREES WITHIN THE
 AFFECTED AREA ON THE TREE DISPOSITION TABULAR LIST TO
 DISCERN THEM FROM THE REST OF THE AREAS.
 THE LAST APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST BE THE BASE FOR
 THE TREE LOCATIONS, AND THEN THE TREES THAT ARE TO BE
 REMOVED OR RELOCATED ARE TO BE IDENTIFIED. THE APPROVED
 LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE NORTH PROPERTY SHOULD BE USED TO
 SHOW THE BUFFER TREES, AND THE ONES IDENTIFIED THAT ARE
 TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED. GENERATOR SIDEWALK APPEARS
 TO CONFLICT WITH SM#2.
  
 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CLEAR LOCATION OF
 WHERE ANY RELOCATED TREES AND PALMS WILL BE PLACED ON
 THE SITE ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
 SOME OF THE LABELED RELOCATIONS AND REPLACEMENTS ARE
 NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE LABELS ON THE EXISTING TREE
 PLAN. QV#1 AND QV#2 MUST BE SHOWN ON THE EXISTING TREE
 PLAN, AND REPLACEMENT LOCATIONS SHOULD ONLY BE SHOWN ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. QV3 IS SHOWN TWICE.
 ALL FINAL LOCATIONS FOR TREES ARE TO BE SHOWN ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN INCLUDING FOR THE NORTH PROPERTY.
  
 3. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. LIVE OAK TREES #5 AND #6 ARE LISTED FOR
 REMOVAL, BUT CONDITION WAS NOT SUPPLIED.
 EXPLANATION OF ADJUSTMENT TO AVOID GOOD TREES PROVIDED,
 BUT CONDITION MUST BE LISTED IN THE TREE DISPOSITION
 FOR ALL REMOVALS AND RELOCATIONS.
  
 4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR
 THE PROPOSED ACCESS DRIVEWAY AND SHOW ANY REMOVAL OR
 REPLACEMENT OF TREES OR SHRUBS, INCLUDING THE NORTH
 PROPERTY.
 PLAN SUPPLIED FOR SOUTH PROPERTY, BUT NOTHING IS SHOWN
 FOR THE EXISTING BUFFER TREES ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTY
 TO THE NORTH. IF THIS IS TO BE SHOWN ON THE MAJOR
 AMENDMENT PLAN, INDICATE THIS ON THE SUBMITTED PLAN.
 CODE REQUIRES THE ADJACENT PROPERTY TREES WITHIN 10
 FEET OF THE PROPERTY LINE TO BE SHOWN ON THE PROPOSED
 PLAN PER SECTION 94-442(B)(2)Q.
 APPROVED AND EXISTING TREES FOR THE NORTH PROPERTY HAVE
 NOT BEEN SHOWN.
  
 5. SATISFIED. THE GENERATOR LOCATION DOES NOT SHOW
 DETAIL FOR THE LOCATION OF THE WALL DESCRIBED IN THE
 NARRATIVE. LOCATION OF ACCESS DOORS NEEDS TO BE SHOWN,
 AND THE HEDGE AND TREES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE
 ENCLOSURE NEED TO BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN.
 GENERATOR ENCLOSURE IS SHOWN CROSSING OVER THE PARCEL
 LINE, SEE COMMENT#4.
  
 6. SATISFIED. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT REMOVAL OF THE
 MATURE BUFFER TREES ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE THAT
 ARE PROVIDING SHADE FOR THE EXISTING PARKING AND
 PROVIDE ALL THE BENEFITS OF A MATURE TREE CANOPY. THE
 APPLICANT SHOULD LOOK AT ADJUSTING THE LOCATION OF THE
 GENERATOR TO MINIMIZE THE NEED TO RELOCATE TREES AND
 PRESERVE THE EXISTING TREES TO MEET THE INTENT OF
 SECTION 94-448.
 7. SATISFIED. INDICATE ALL CHANGES TO THE PLANT LIST
 WITH CLOUDING AND INDICATE THE LIMITS OF THE AFFECTED
 AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND SITE PLAN.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 12-18-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 12-18-2019 Time 09:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 12-18-2019 Time 09:50 Sent To  
Notes
2019-12-18 09:50:49FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: MORSELIFE Z19090009
 DECEMBER 18, 2019
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. THE EXISTING TREE PLAN AND DISPOSITION
 LIST ON SHEET L102B IS OUTDATED AND DOES NOT REFLECT
 WHAT CURRENTLY EXISTS ON SITE. SUPPLY A CURRENT PLAN
 AND IDENTIFY THE TREES WITHIN THE AFFECTED AREA ON THE
 TREE DISPOSITION TABULAR LIST TO DISCERN THEM FROM THE
 REST OF THE AREAS.
 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CLEAR LOCATION OF
 WHERE ANY RELOCATED TREES AND PALMS WILL BE PLACED ON
 THE SITE ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
 SOME OF THE LABELED RELOCATIONS AND REPLACEMENTS ARE
 NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE LABELS ON THE EXISTING TREE
 PLAN. QV#1 AND QV#2 MUST BE SHOWN ON THE EXISTING TREE
 PLAN, AND REPLACEMENT LOCATIONS SHOULD ONLY BE SHOWN ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. QV3 IS SHOWN TWICE.
  
 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES
 NATIVE TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE
 OR RELOCATED. LIVE OAK TREES #5 AND #6 ARE LISTED FOR
 REMOVAL, BUT CONDITION WAS NOT SUPPLIED.
 EXPLANATION OF ADJUSTMENT TO AVOID GOOD TREES PROVIDED,
 BUT CONDITION MUST BE LISTED IN THE TREE DISPOSITION
 FOR ALL REMOVALS AND RELOCATIONS.
  
 4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR
 THE PROPOSED ACCESS DRIVEWAY AND SHOW ANY REMOVAL OR
 REPLACEMENT OF TREES OR SHRUBS, INCLUDING THE NORTH
 PROPERTY.
 PLAN SUPPLIED FOR SOUTH PROPERTY, BUT NOTHING IS SHOWN
 FOR THE EXISTING BUFFER TREES ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTY
 TO THE NORTH. IF THIS IS TO BE SHOWN ON THE MAJOR
 AMENDMENT PLAN, INDICATE THIS ON THE SUBMITTED PLAN.
 CODE REQUIRES THE ADJACENT PROPERTY TREES WITHIN 10
 FEET OF THE PROPERTY LINE TO BE SHOWN ON THE PROPOSED
 PLAN PER SECTION 94-442(B)(2)Q.
  
 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE GENERATOR LOCATION DOES NOT
 SHOW DETAIL FOR THE LOCATION OF THE WALL DESCRIBED IN
 THE NARRATIVE. LOCATION OF ACCESS DOORS NEEDS TO BE
 SHOWN, AND THE HEDGE AND TREES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE
 ENCLOSURE NEED TO BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN.
 GENERATOR ENCLOSURE IS SHOWN CROSSING OVER THE PARCEL
 LINE, SEE COMMENT#4.
  
 6. SATISFIED. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT REMOVAL OF THE
 MATURE BUFFER TREES ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE THAT
 ARE PROVIDING SHADE FOR THE EXISTING PARKING AND
 PROVIDE ALL THE BENEFITS OF A MATURE TREE CANOPY. THE
 APPLICANT SHOULD LOOK AT ADJUSTING THE LOCATION OF THE
 GENERATOR TO MINIMIZE THE NEED TO RELOCATE TREES AND
 PRESERVE THE EXISTING TREES TO MEET THE INTENT OF
 SECTION 94-448.
 7. SATISFIED. INDICATE ALL CHANGES TO THE PLANT LIST
 WITH CLOUDING AND INDICATE THE LIMITS OF THE AFFECTED
 AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND SITE PLAN.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-08-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 10-08-2019 Time 15:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 10-08-2019 Time 15:59 Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-08 16:01:15FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: MORSELIFE Z19090009
 OCTOBER 8, 2019
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. THE EXISTING TREE PLAN AND DISPOSITION LIST ON SHEET
 L102B IS OUTDATED AND DOES NOT REFLECT WHAT CURRENTLY
 EXISTS ON SITE. SUPPLY A CURRENT PLAN AND IDENTIFY THE
 TREES WITHIN THE AFFECTED AREA ON THE TREE DISPOSITION
 TABULAR LIST TO DISCERN THEM FROM THE REST OF THE
 AREAS.
 2. PROVIDE A CLEAR LOCATION OF WHERE ANY RELOCATED
 TREES AND PALMS WILL BE PLACED ON THE SITE ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 3. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES IN GOOD
 CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. LIVE
 OAK TREES #5 AND #6 ARE LISTED FOR REMOVAL, BUT
 CONDITION WAS NOT SUPPLIED.
  
 4. PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE PROPOSED ACCESS
 DRIVEWAY AND SHOW ANY REMOVAL OR REPLACEMENT OF TREES
 OR SHRUBS, INCLUDING THE NORTH PROPERTY.
  
 5. THE GENERATOR LOCATION DOES NOT SHOW DETAIL FOR THE
 LOCATION OF THE WALL DESCRIBED IN THE NARRATIVE.
 LOCATION OF ACCESS DOORS NEEDS TO BE SHOWN, AND THE
 HEDGE AND TREES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE ENCLOSURE NEED
 TO BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN.
  
 6. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT REMOVAL OF THE MATURE BUFFER
 TREES ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE THAT ARE PROVIDING
 SHADE FOR THE EXISTING PARKING AND PROVIDE ALL THE
 BENEFITS OF A MATURE TREE CANOPY. THE APPLICANT SHOULD
 LOOK AT ADJUSTING THE LOCATION OF THE GENERATOR TO
 MINIMIZE THE NEED TO RELOCATE TREES AND PRESERVE THE
 EXISTING TREES TO MEET THE INTENT OF SECTION 94-448.
 7. INDICATE ALL CHANGES TO THE PLANT LIST WITH CLOUDING
 AND INDICATE THE LIMITS OF THE AFFECTED AREAS ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN AND SITE PLAN.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status P Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 10-10-2019 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 10-10-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-09 11:25:36NO COMMENTS.
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status P Date 12-12-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 12-12-2019 Time 11:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 12-12-2019 Time 11:56 Sent To  
Notes
2019-12-12 11:56:26THE FOLLOWING COMMENT IS FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 DECEMBER 5, 2019 REVIEW SUBMITTAL PACKAGE:
  
 1. MAINTAIN THE MINIMUM PERIMETER ELEVATION (USE THE
 HIGHER OF TWO PROPERTIES) FOR THE DRIVE CONNECTION TO
 THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH UNLESS BOTH PROPERTIES SHARE
 THE SAME STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND WATER LEVELS
 ON BOTH SIDES OF THE PROPERTY LINE ARE CONTROLLED BY
 THE SAME CONTROL STRUCTURE.
  
 TRACY WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 [email protected]
 561-494-1120
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-08-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 10-08-2019 Time 16:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 10-08-2019 Time 16:44 Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-08 16:44:30THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT HTTP://
 WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PER
 MITS-APPLICATIONS
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
 1. IT APPEARS THE DRIVEWAY CONNECTION AND CONVERTING AN
 INLET TO A MANHOLE WILL AFFECT DRAINAGE ALONG THE
 COMMON PARCEL LINE.
  
 2. THE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM NEEDS TO BE
 DESIGNED TO CURRENT SFWMD CRITERIA. PROVIDE
 CALCULATIONS SIGNED AND SEALED BY A PROFESSIONAL
 ENGINEER SHOWING HOW THE PEAK STAGES AND PEAK
 DISCHARGES ARE NOT AFFECTED BY THE FILLING OF THE LAKE
 FOR THE AUDITORIUM BUILDING AND THE ADDITIONAL
 IMPERVIOUS AREA.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
 THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS
 CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE
 ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED
 WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP MODIFICATION PRIOR
 TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status P Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 02-26-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-02-26 13:51:49PASSED
  
 SHING TSOI
 CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
 561-494-1141
 [email protected]
 (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS)
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 01-09-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-01-09 10:44:261. PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION INCLUDING MARKED
 CROSSWALK AND PEDESTRIAN ADA RAMPS ALONG THE PROPOSED
 ACCESS ROAD CONNECTING TO EXISTING BUILDINGS.
  
 SHING TSOI
 CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
 561-494-1141
 [email protected]
 (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS)
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 10-08-2019 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-08 16:47:47SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
 1. PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION ALONG THE PROPOSED
 ACCESS ROAD.
 2. CLARIFY THE LOCATIONS OF THE ACCESS GATE, IF ANY,
 NEAR THE PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD.
 3. A MEDIAN/CURB SEPARATOR IS SHOWN IMMEDIATELY NORTH
 OF THE PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD. PLEASE CLARIFY THE VEHICLE
 CIRCULATION IN THIS AREA, AS WELL AS VEHICLE ACCESS TO
 THE GATED AREA.
 4. CLARIFY IF A DITCH IS RUNNING UNDERNEATH THE
 PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD. IF SO, A CULVERT STRUCTURE WOULD
 BE REQUIRED.
  
  
 SHING TSOI
 CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
 561-494-1141
 [email protected]
 (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS)
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 5 Status F Date 04-30-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 04-30-2020 Time 16:58 Rev Time 0.75
Received By eschneid Date 04-30-2020 Time 14:00 Sent To  
Notes
2020-04-30 16:56:45CASE NO. PB1248GG ? 3RD RESUBMITTAL REVIEW
 MORSELIFE AUDITORIUM & GENERATOR
 4920 LORING DRIVE
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE
 (5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM
 THE DATE OF THE COMMENTS (BY JUNE 7, 2020), THE CASE
 SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL
 REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($60).
  
 GENERATOR
  
 1) UPDATED COMMENT: STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE BUILDING
 PERMIT FOR THE GENERATOR.
  
 A. IN ORDER TO MATCH THE BUILDING PERMIT, THE MASTER
 PLAN AND THE SITE PLAN NEED TO REFLECT THE GENERATOR
 SLAB AT 49 FEET 6 INCHES X 14 FEET 6 INCHES (TO SCALE).
 NOTE: THIS INCLUDES THE GENERATOR ENCLOSURE AND THE
 STAIRS, WHICH MAY BE SHOWN SUPERIMPOSED ON THE SLAB AT
 YOUR OPTION. REGARDLESS OF IF THE STAIRS ARE SHOWN
 SUPERIMPOSED, THE WALKWAYS FROM THE STAIR BASES TO THE
 CURB NEED TO BE SHOWN. CURRENTLY, THE PLANS DO NOT SHOW
 THE OUTSIDE LIMITS OF THE SLAB. THIS ALSO NEEDS TO BE
 SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 B. THE OVERALL HEIGHT OF THE GENERATOR, INCLUDING THE
 EXHAUST PIPE, IS 16.67 FEET. THE PLANS NEED TO INCLUDE
 THIS CORRECT HEIGHT DIMENSION.
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 03-23-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 03-23-2020 Time 10:35 Rev Time 0.25
Received By eschneid Date 03-23-2020 Time 09:47 Sent To  
Notes
2020-03-23 14:55:181) ON THE BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL, THE LIFE SAFETY
 PLAN, FLOOR PLAN AND ELEVATIONS SHOW ONLY ONE DOOR ON
 THE WEST FACADE OF THE BUILDING. THE SITE PLAN THAT YOU
 SUBMITTED SHOWS TWO ENTRY POINTS, PLEASE CORRECT TO
 BRING IN LINE WITH THE PERMIT PLANS.
  
 2) THE CIVIL PLANS (BOTH SUBMITTED WITH THE ZONING
 APPLICATION AND THE BUILDING PERMIT) SHOW 16 FOOT DEEP
 PARKING SPACES WITH A TWO FOOT SIDEWALK OVERHANG
 INSTEAD OF WHEEL STOPS ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE
 AUDITORIUM. THE SITE PLAN THAT YOU SUBMITTED SHOWS THE
 TRADITIONAL 18 FOOT DEEP SPACES WITH WHEEL STOPS,
 PLEASE CORRECT TO BRING IN LINE WITH THE PERMIT PLANS.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 03-05-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 03-05-2020 Time 13:09 Rev Time 1.00
Received By eschneid Date 03-04-2020 Time 15:10 Sent To  
Notes
2020-03-05 13:12:10CASE NO. PB1248GG - 2ND RESUBMITTAL REVIEW
 MORSELIFE AUDITORIUM & GENERATOR
 4920 LORING DRIVE
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE
 (5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM
 THE DATE OF THE COMMENTS (BY MAY 7, 2020), THE CASE
 SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL
 REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT SINCE PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS
 WERE NOT ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT IS ASSESSED A
 RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE IS 20% OF THE ORIGINAL
 APPLICATION FEE ($60).
  
 GENERATOR
  
 1) UPDATED COMMENT: THE MASTER PLAN AND SITE PLAN SHOW
 THE GENERATOR ENCLOSURE (INCLUDING THE STAIRS)
 DIMENSION AS 24 FEET X 50 FEET AND 15 FEET IN HEIGHT.
 NO DIMENSIONS ARE PROVIDED ON THE CIVIL PLAN. THE
 GENERATOR ENCLOSURE DRAWING SHOWS THE DIMENSIONS AS 14
 FEET X 47.35 FEET AND 16.67 FEET IN HEIGHT. THE PLANS
 DO NOT SHOW THE GENERATOR ENCLOSURE AS THAT LARGE (IT
 SCALES TO MATCH THE ENCLOSURE DRAWING). THE PLANS NEED
 TO CLEARLY STATE THE CORRECT GENERATOR ENCLOSURE
 DIMENSIONS.
  
 2) UPDATED COMMENT: THE PROPOSED GENERATOR IS
 STRADDLING THE PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN THE MORSELIFE SITE
 AND THE FORMER HOMESAFE SITE. THIS WILL NEED TO BE
 ADDRESSED AS A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT REGULATION
 ALLOWANCE WITH THE FORTHCOMING MAJOR PLANNED
 DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT FOR THE PACE RELOCATION AND
 HOSPICE CONSTRUCTION. STAFF IS UNCLEAR IF YOU ARE
 CONTINUING TO INCLUDE THE GENERATOR WITH THIS
 SUBMITTAL. AT THE PPRC MEETING FOR THE AUDITORIUM IT
 WAS DISCUSSED THAT THE GENERATOR WOULD NO LONGER BE
 WITH THIS MINOR AMENDMENT. PLEASE CLARIFY.
  
 3) NEW COMMENT: THE EXISTING TREE PLAN IS NOT THE PLAN
 (SHEET L102B) SHOWING THE CURRENTLY INSTALLED
 CONDITIONS BASED ON THE RYNA GREENBAUM DRIVE
 RECONFIGURATION. IT SHOWS PRE-RYNA GREENBAUM
 CONDITIONS. USE THE CURRENT LANDSCAPE PLAN AS THE BASE.
  
 CONNECTION
  
 4) REPEAT COMMENT: NO LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWING THE AREA
 AROUND THE CONNECTION WAS PROVIDED. THE ONLY PLAN
 PROVIDED IS A TREE MITIGATION PLAN (SHEET LA-2 MIT).
 THE MITIGATION PLAN DOES NOT ACCURATELY SHOW THE
 LANDSCAPE ON THE HOMESAFE SIDE OF THE PROPERTY LINE (AS
 SHOWN ON THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN AND THE PALM BEACH
 COUNTY PICTOMETRY PHOTOS). THE LANDSCAPE PLAN NEEDS TO
 SHOW CODE COMPLIANT LANDSCAPE FOR THE FINAL CONNECTION
 LAYOUT - EX. THE TERMINAL ISLAND ADJACENT TO THE NEW
 CONNECTION IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A TERMINAL ISLAND TREE.
  
 5) NEW COMMENT: THE COMMENT RESPONSE STATES THAT THE
 MITIGATION WILL BE SHOWN ON THE MAJOR AMENDMENT. YOU
 ARE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE THE MITIGATION FOR THE TREES
 REMOVED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT WITH THIS APPLICATION.
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-08-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 01-08-2020 Time 08:38 Rev Time 1.00
Received By eschneid Date 01-07-2020 Time 09:50 Sent To  
Notes
2020-01-08 08:38:23CASE NO. PB1248GG - 1ST RESUBMITTAL REVIEW
 MORSELIFE AUDITORIUM & GENERATOR
 4920 LORING DRIVE
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE
 (5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM
 THE DATE OF THE COMMENTS (BY MARCH, 7, 2020), THE CASE
 SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL
 REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 ADDITIONAL RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF
 PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE
 SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED
 A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL
 APPLICATION FEE ($60).
  
 GENERATOR
  
 1) UPDATED COMMENT: THE MASTER PLAN PROVIDES THE
 GENERATOR ENCLOSURE DIMENSION AS 24 FEET X 50 FEET, YET
 NONE OF THE PLANS SHOW THE GENERATOR ENCLOSURE AS THAT
 LARGE. THE PLANS SEEM TO SHOW THE SAME SIZED GENERATOR
 ALL IN THE SAME LOCATION, BUT STAFF IS UNABLE TO VERIFY
 DUE TO THE CONFLICTING INFORMATION. THE PLANS NEED TO
 CLEARLY SHOW GENERATOR ENCLOSURE DIMENSIONS
  
 2) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PLANS NEED TO INDICATE THE 12
 FOOT TALL GENERATOR WALLS AND WHERE THE GATE OPENINGS
 ARE. NO DETAIL OF THE GENERATOR ENCLOSURE, INCLUDING
 THE GENERATOR AND THE WALLS, WAS PROVIDED.
  
 3) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PLANS NEED TO SHOW THE DIMENSION
 OF THE GENERATOR WALL FROM THE END OF THE PARKING
 SPACES AND DRIVE AISLE CURB LINE. THIS NEEDS TO BE A
 MINIMUM OF FIVE (5) FEET TO INCLUDE THE LANDSCAPE
 SCREENING LISTED IN THE JUSTIFICATION LETTER. PLEASE
 REMEMBER THAT THE PARKING SPACES ALONG RYNA GREENBAUN
 DRIVE WERE CONSTRUCTED WITH THE TWO (2) FOOT OVERHANG,
 SO THIS OFF SET NEEDS TO BE INCLUDED SEVEN (7) FEET
 TOTAL. NO DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
  
 4) UPDATED COMMENT: THE PROPOSED GENERATOR IS
 STRADDLING THE PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN THE MORSELIFE SITE
 AND THE FORMER HOMESAFE SITE. THIS WILL NEED TO BE
 ADDRESSED AS A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT REGULATION
 ALLOWANCE WITH THE FORTHCOMING MAJOR PLANNED
 DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT FOR THE PACE RELOCATION AND
 HOSPICE CONSTRUCTION. STAFF NEEDS TO REVIEW THE
 GENERATOR ENCLOSURE DETAIL (COMMENT #2) TO DETERMINE
 HOW THIS WILL BE ADDRESSED WITH THE MAJOR PLANNED
 DEVELOPMENT.
  
 CONNECTION
  
 5) UPDATED COMMENT: NO LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWING THE AREA
 AROUND THE CONNECTION WAS PROVIDED. THE LANDSCAPE ON
 THE NORTHERN PARCEL IS NOT SHOWN.
  
 GENERAL
  
 6) REPEAT COMMENT: WHERE IS THE "HOMESAFE OFFICE"
 REFERRED TO ON THE MASTER SITE DATA TABLE? THIS 6,111
 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING DOES NOT APPEAR ON THE MASTER
 PLAN. THE 12,200 SQUARE FEET ON THE NORTH PARCEL
 INCLUDE THE THREE BUILDINGS WHICH CURRENTLY EXIST. THIS
 WAS NOT REMOVED FROM THE MASTER SITE DATA TABLE (AND IS
 STILL SHOWN ON THE HOSPICE/PACE EXPANSION MAJOR
 AMENDMENT MASTER SITE DATA TABLE).
  
 7) REPEAT COMMENT: THE HOUSING BREAKDOWN TABLE HAS
 ADDED 10 BEDS UNDER THE TRADITION PHASE II RESIDENTIAL
 LINE ITEM WHICH PREVIOUSLY DID NOT EXIST. THESE HOSPICE
 BEDS WERE NOT REMOVED FROM THE HOUSING BREAKDOWN TABLE.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-09-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 10-09-2019 Time 14:37 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 10-09-2019 Time 14:37 Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-09 14:38:41CASE NO. PB1248GG
 MORSELIFE AUDITORIUM & GENERATOR
 4920 LORING DRIVE
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE
 (5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY DECEMBER 10,
 2019), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY
 FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($60).
  
 1) THE CHECK SUBMITTED WITH THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION
 DID NOT COVER THE FULL FEES FOR THE APPLICATION. YOU
 STILL OWE THE CITY $1,288. PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS
 E-MAIL TO ALEX AHRENHOLZ FOR THE BACK UP ON THE FEE
 CALCULATION.
  
 AUDITORIUM
  
 2) IT APPEARS THERE ARE TWO WALKWAYS LEADING TO THE
 SIDEWALK ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPOSED AUDITORIUM
 THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE CIVIL PLAN.
  
 3) PROVIDE VERIFICATION FROM THE CITY'S BUILDING
 DIVISION THAT THE ENTRIES SHOWN ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE
 AUDITORIUM DO NOT REQUIRE THE ADDITION OF ADA PARKING
 SPACES.
  
 GENERATOR
  
 4) THE PLANS NEED TO INCLUDE THE GENERATOR ENCLOSURE
 DIMENSIONS. IT IS UNCLEAR FROM THE PROVIDED PLANS IF
 THE GENERATOR "BOX" IS THE PAD OR THE ENCLOSURE WALLS.
  
 5) THE PLANS NEED TO INDICATE THE 12 FOOT TALL
 GENERATOR WALLS AND WHERE THE GATE OPENINGS ARE.
  
 6) THE PLANS NEED TO SHOW THE DIMENSION OF THE
 GENERATOR WALL FROM THE END OF THE PARKING SPACES AND
 DRIVE AISLE CURB LINE. THIS NEEDS TO BE A MINIMUM OF
 FIVE (5) FEET TO INCLUDE THE LANDSCAPE SCREENING LISTED
 IN THE JUSTIFICATION LETTER. PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE
 PARKING SPACES ALONG RYNA GREENBAUN DRIVE WERE
 CONSTRUCTED WITH THE TWO (2) FOOT OVERHANG, SO THIS OFF
 SET NEEDS TO BE INCLUDED. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN APPEARS TO
 ONLY HAVE A FOUR (4) FOOT PLANTING AREA DUE TO THE
 PROXIMITY TO THE OVERHANG.
  
 7) IT APPEARS THAT THE GENERATOR "BOX" IS SHOWN
 DIFFERENTLY (SIZE AND SETBACKS) ON THE MASTER PLAN,
 LANDSCAPE PLAN AND THE CIVIL PLAN. IT CLEARLY AVOIDS
 THE 12 FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT ON THE CIVIL PLAN, BUT
 SINCE THIS EASEMENT IS NOT SHOWN ON THE MASTER PLAN OR
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, STAFF IS UNABLE TO TELL IF THE
 GENERATOR ENCLOSURE IS LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE EASEMENT.
  
 8) THE LANDSCAPE SCREEN HEDGE IS NOT PROVIDED ON THE
 NORTH SIDE OF THE GENERATOR ENCLOSURE.
  
 9) THE RELOCATED FENCE IS NOT SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN OR THE MASTER PLAN.
  
 10) THE PROPOSED GENERATOR IS STRADDLING THE PROPERTY
 LINE BETWEEN THE MORSELIFE SITE AND THE FORMER HOMESAFE
 SITE. THIS WILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED AS A SPECIFIC
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATION ALLOWANCE WITH THE FORTHCOMING
 MAJOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT FOR THE PACE
 RELOCATION AND HOSPICE CONSTRUCTION.
  
 CONNECTION
  
 11) A PEDESTRIAN ROUTE, SEPARATED FROM THE VEHICULAR
 TRAVEL LANES, NEEDS TO BE INCLUDED WITH THE VEHICULAR
 CONNECTION BETWEEN THE TWO SITES. THE PEDESTRIAN ROUTE
 NEEDS TO CONNECT THE SIDEWALK NETWORK ON THE MORSELIFE
 SITE WITH THE SIDEWALK NETWORK ON THE FORMER HOMESAFE
 SITE.
  
 12) THE RESUBMITTED MASTER PLAN AND CIVIL PLAN NEED TO
 SHOW THE FINAL CONNECTION LAYOUT WITHOUT THE EXISTING
 CURBS, PARKING SPACES, ETC., SINCE THIS WILL BE THE
 APPROVED LAYOUT.
  
 13) PLEASE CLARIFY IF THE DIVIDER MEDIAN IN THE DRIVE
 AISLE BY THE NEW VEHICULAR CONNECTION IS BEING REMOVED.
 THE LINE WORK ON THE CIVIL PLAN SEEMS TO INDICATE THIS,
 BUT IT IS NOT NOTED ON THE PLAN.
  
 14) NO LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWING THE AREA AROUND THE
 CONNECTION WAS PROVIDED.
  
 15) SHOW THE PROPOSED GATE DETAILS AT THE CONNECTION.
  
 GENERAL
  
 16) WHERE IS THE "HOMESAFE OFFICE" REFERRED TO ON THE
 MASTER SITE DATA TABLE? THIS 6,111 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING
 DOES NOT APPEAR ON THE MASTER PLAN. THE 12,200 SQUARE
 FEET ON THE NORTH PARCEL INCLUDE THE THREE BUILDINGS
 WHICH CURRENTLY EXIST.
  
 17) THE HOUSING BREAKDOWN TABLE HAS ADDED 10 BEDS UNDER
 THE TRADITION PHASE II RESIDENTIAL LINE ITEM WHICH
 PREVIOUSLY DID NOT EXIST. WHAT ARE THESE? IF BEDS HAVE
 BEEN ADDED AT THE EXPENSE OF UNITS, THEN THE UNIT COUNT
 NEEDS TO BE REDUCED ACCORDINGLY. NOTE: THERE ARE ONLY 4
 UNITS AVAILABLE TO CONVERT TO BEDS IN THE PROJECT IF
 THE NUMBER OF UNITS IN TRADITIONS PHASE II REMAINS AT
 182.
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved