Plan Review Details - Project Z19090006
Plan Review Stops For Project Z19090006
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 10-09-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 10-09-2019 Time 18:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 10-09-2019 Time 18:54 Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-09 18:58:27DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2 BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 3. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR MAY BE
 REQUIRED. PLEASE CONTACT JEFFREY ODOMS, UTILITIES O&M
 SUPERINTENDENT, PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT, FATS OILS
 AND GREASE DIVISION, AT (561) 822-2172, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 4. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS,
 FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS,
 GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE,
 SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 5. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
 CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.
  
 6. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
 AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
 CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
 THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.
  
 7. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT
 WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL
 HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT
 MICHAEL ORIO, GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494
 1080, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 3 Status P Date 01-30-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 01-30-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 01-30-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-01-30 14:54:02PASSED WITH PROVISOS:
  
 1. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE DEDICATED
 UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO
 PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS.
 2. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE
 ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION OF WATER
 METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION.
 3. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE CALLOUT
 DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA AND FIRE BACKFLOW
 PREVENTER AS DCDA. SPECIFY LEAD FREE DESIGN ON ALL
 BACKFLOWS.
 4. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE CONFIRM ALL
 DRY UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN RIGHT OF WAY.
  
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS.
  
 RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-06-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 01-06-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 01-06-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-01-06 11:56:09COMMENTS PER MARK HURLEY, CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR,
 PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-822-2262, [email protected]
  
 -MORE VERIFICATION NEEDS TO BE DONE ON THE EXISTING
 WATER SERVICES AND PLANS UPDATED WITH FINDINGS. FOR
 EXAMPLE, SITE VISIT FOUND THAT DCDA FIRELINE BACKFLOW
 IS 8 INCH AND THAT THERE IS A 1.5 INCH ACTIVE
 IRRIGATION METER IN THE SIDEWALK. THE EXISTING METER IN
 THE SIDEWALK IS NOT A FIRE METER ? IT IS A 3 INCH
 DOMESTIC METER (NOT SEEING A 6 INCH FIRE METER IN
 SIDEWALK). THE WATER LINES NEAR THE PROPERTY/ROW LINE
 ON THE PLAN, DO NOT MATCH OUR GIS AND SKETCH DRAWINGS ?
 CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN TO LOCATE AND VERIFY WHERE THE
 EXISTING PIPING IS SPECIFICALLY LOCATED AND HOW IT IS
 SETUP, AND THEN HAVE PLAN REFLECT THAT.
  
 -THE SIZE/FOOTPRINT OF THE EXISTING WATER METER VAULT
 IN SIDEWALK NEAR SE CORNER OF PROPERTY DOES NOT LOOK
 ACCURATELY REPRESENTED ON PLAN.
  
 -TAP OF PROPOSED 1 INCH WATER SERVICE MAY NEED BE
 RELOCATED SLIGHTLY WEST OR NORTH GIVEN THE EXISTING 1.5
 INCH METER TAP NOT SHOWN AND THE PROXIMITY TO DRIVEWAY
 (DO NOT WANT TAP IN DRIVEWAY ? CURRENT DRIVEWAY HAS
 ANGLES, BUT THOSE ARE NOT SHOWN ON PLAN).
  
 -PLAN DRAWING DOES NOT REFLECT EXISTING TWIN/PARALLEL 4
 INCH RPPA?S (1 MISSING). ALSO MISSING ONE SMALLER
 EXISTING BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY FOR IRRIGATION.
  
 -PLAN NOT SHOWING OTHER UTILITIES LIKE GAS OR
 COMMUNICATION NEAR SE CORNER OF PROPERTY. IS THAT
 BECAUSE THERE ARE NONE, OR WERE THEY JUST NOT ADDED? IF
 THERE ARE OTHER UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WHICH COULD
 CONFLICT WITH THE WATER LINE INSTALLATION, SHOULD BE
 SHOWN ON PLAN.
  
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS.
  
 RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR WPB, FL 33401 (MAILING
 ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402)
 MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098
 FAX: (561) 494-1116 MOBILE: (561) 246-9525
 EMAIL: [email protected] WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING
  
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-07-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 10-07-2019 Time   Rev Time  
Received By rrossano Date 10-07-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-07 10:41:141. THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF
 REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY
 AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND
 WASTEWATER UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE
 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK
 BELOW: HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=
 ~\WPB_WEBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION
 -FULL-PACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC0
 2A97B1960045731D3658206F27451722716EF
 THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE
 FOUND HERE: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBL
 IC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
 2. CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH,
 FLORIDA, CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08, ADOPTED
 SEPT. 22, 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)
 CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. SEC. 90-7.
 POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER SERVICE
 FACILITIES OF THE CITY.
 THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
 BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
 BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
 3. AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
 MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI
 CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL
 4. PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS
 OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES,
 INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND
 SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES,
 METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE
 SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING
 GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS,
 ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL
 INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER
 LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN
 VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
 PLEASE SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT
 MATERIAL. ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL
 EXISTING AND PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT,
 INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &
 TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL
 UTILITY CROSSINGS.
 5. CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY
 ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
 RIGHT OF WAY.
 6. PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE
 DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB
 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION).
 7. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM
 AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE
 PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER.
 8. SHOW VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION INFORMATION
 (NAVD 88 AND NGVD 29) ON ALL SHEETS.
 9. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF EXISTING AND REVISED
 PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED
 IMPACTED AREAS.
 10. PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
 PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
 11. COORDINATE WITH MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE
 SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING
 PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT
 HIM AT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]
 12. PROVIDE UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY
 PERSONNEL TO PROPOSED UTILITIES INCLUDING WATER METERS.
 13. PLEASE PROVIDE 10 FT. MIN. HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE
 BETWEEN PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER LINES.
 14. PLEASE PROVIDE INLET ELEVATIONS AT ANY PROPOSED
 MANHOLES.
 15. SPECIFY EXISTING SANITARY LINE MATERIAL IN RIGHT OF
 WAY, AND PROVIDE VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SERVICE.
 16. PLEASE SHOW VALVE SIZES AND LOCATIONS. LABEL CITY
 POINTS OF SERVICE.
 17. LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE APPLICABLE.
 18. PLEASE PROVIDE PROJECT ADDRESS ON PLANS.
 19. PLEASE UPDATE CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAILS.
 20. CONFIRM PROPOSED GREASE TRAP IS SHOWN TO SCALE.
 21. PLEASE PROVIDE F.F.E. AT 12 IN. ABOVE NEAREST
 SANITARY MANHOLE.
 22. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES
 OF WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS.
 23. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING
 APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT
 SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING
 SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED
 LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
 24. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL CLEARLY SHOW ROAD
 RIGHT OF WAY.
 25. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL PROVIDE SANITARY
 ELEVATIONS AT MANHOLE TIE-IN.
 26. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES
 ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY
 LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT
 PARCELS.
 27. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES
 ARE BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL
 ADDRESSES.
 28. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN TRENCHING IN
 IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE 50
 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF
 PROPOSED TRENCH PER CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-9.
 29. PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING AND
 INCLUDE Z PERMIT NUMBER IN ALL CORRESPONDENCE.
  
 ---------------------------
  
 PLEASE SEE ADTIONAL COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, CUSTOMER
 SERVICE SUPERVISOR, CITY OF WPB UTILITIES:
  
 STARBUCKS ? DIXIE & BELVEDERE (SHEET C.6)
 1? WATER METER SHOULD BE LABELED DOMESTIC, IRRIGATION,
 &/OR FIRE (CANNOT FEED FIRE IF USED FOR ANYTHING ELSE ?
 FIRE WOULD BE DEDICATED/SEPARATE)
 A.) 1? METER SHOULD NOT HAVE 2? TAP
 B.) METER BOX NEEDS UTILITY EASEMENT IF ON PRIVATE
 PROPERTY.
 C.) NEED WS SD # LABELLED.
  
 1.5? RPZ SHOULD BE LOCATED CLOSED TO METER -> NEEDS TO
 BE LABELED WITH APPROPRIATE CITY WPB WS SD #
 A.) NEED ROOT BARRIERS PROTECTING METER & BACKFLOW PIPE
 FROM EXISTING ADJACENT PALM TREES.
  
 - EXISTING 4 IN. WATER SERVICE -> DOES IT HAVE A METER?
 IF SO, SHOULD BE DRAWN/LABELED ON PLAN.
 - EXISTING 6 IN. DDCV IS LABELED BOTH HAVING 4 IN. & 6
 IN. DIP -> 4 IN. NEEDS TO BE PROPERLY POINTING TO WM
 INSTEAD OF FIRE PIPE IF THAT WHAT INTENDED.
 - HAZARDOUS CROSSING BETWEEN 1.S PVC METER SERVICE & 6
 IN. SANITARY SERVICE IN PARKING LOT -> WATER SERVICE
 NEEDS BE HIGHER THAN SANITARY SERVICE (NOT UNDERNEATH).
  
 STARBUCKS ? DIXIE & BELVEDERE (SHEET C.9)
 - MISSING SOME WS STANDARD DETAILS & NOT THE NEWEST
 REVISIONS OF ONES THAT ARE INCLUDED.
  
 CONTACT MR. HURLEY AT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]
  
  
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS.
 RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT
 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 01-27-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 01-27-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 01-27-2020 Time 15:40 Sent To  
Notes
2020-01-27 15:45:23AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC INFORMATION PACKET AND
 RESPONSE LETTER DATED JANUARY 21, 2020, FROM URBAN
 DESIGN KILDAY STUDIOS, TO JOHN P. ROACH, AICP,
 PRINCIPLE PLANNER, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE
 PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.
  
 THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES
 NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
 THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 10-03-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 10-03-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 10-03-2019 Time 14:04 Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-03 14:13:38THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS(DURING CONSTRUCTION) AND EXIT POINTS ARE
 TO BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY
 VEHICLES DURING ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 PROPOSED SITE ACCESS(FINSIHED SITE) AND TRAVEL PATHS
 ARE ACCEPTABLE.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE
 OCCUPANCY TYPE, PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE.
  
 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE
 HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY
 INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY
 COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 THERE IS AN EXISITNG FIRE HYDRANT LOCATED ON THE SITE
 PLAN THAT IS ACCEPTABLE. NO ADDITIONAL NOR NEW FIRE
 HYDRANTS ARE REQUIRED. HOWEVER, IT IS UNKNOWN IF THIS
 IS A PRIVATE HYDRANT OR CITY OWNED. IF PRIVATE, A
 FLOW/GPM TEST AND NEEDED MAINTENANCE IS REQUIRED OR
 ENSURED.
  
 8. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY
 PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL BE PROVIDED THAT
 ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL DISTANCES, COMMON
 PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, EXIT SIGNS,
 EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A PUBLIC WAY, FIRE
 EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE SAFETY FEATURES
 AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 9. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES
 NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 10. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 01-31-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 01-31-2020 Time 14:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 01-31-2020 Time 14:01 Sent To  
Notes
2020-01-31 14:02:18FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: SHOPS AT THE PRESS Z19090006
 JANUARY 31, 2020
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. IDENTIFY THE TREES WITHIN THE AFFECTED
 AREA ON THE TREE DISPOSITION TABULAR LIST TO DISCERN
 THEM FROM THE REST OF THE AREAS.
  
 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. LIVE OAK TREES #529 AND #530 ARE STILL
 LISTED AS GOOD CONDITION, SO MUST BE RELOCATED. LIVE
 OAK TREES #567 AND #568 ARE ALSO LISTED IN GOOD
 CONDITION. IF THEY CANNOT BE RELOCATED FOR ANY REASON,
 OR THE CONDITION HAS CHANGED, INDICATE THIS ON THE
 CHART.
  
 3. SATISFIED. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT REMOVAL OF THE
 MATURE BUFFER TREES ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE THAT
 ARE PROVIDING SHADE FOR THE EXISTING SIDEWALK AND
 PROVIDE ALL THE BENEFITS OF A MATURE TREE CANOPY. THE
 APPLICANT SHOULD LOOK AT PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND
 ADJUST THE PROPOSED NORTH CURB LINE TO FIT THE EXISTING
 CURB LINE IN ORDER TO PRESERVE THE EXISTING TREES AND
 MEET THE INTENT OF SECTION 94-448.
  
 4. SATISFIED. THE SITE DATA DOES NOT SHOW THE LANDSCAPE
 AREA FOR THE SITE WITH THE PROPOSED CHANGES. THIS WAS
 BELOW THE REQUIRED 15% ON THE PREVIOUS APPLICATION AND
 MUST BE CORRECTED TO MEET THE CODE REQUIREMENTS.
  
 5. SATISFIED. PROPOSED LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS
 MUST BE SHOWN ON THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 6. SATISFIED. WATER BACKFLOW AND FIRE VALVES ARE
 PROPOSED IN THE SOUTHEAST TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND ON
 THE ENGINEERING PLANS. REQUIRED TREES MUST BE INSTALLED
 IN TERMINAL ISLANDS, SO UTILITIES CANNOT BE LOCATED IN
 POSITIONS THAT WOULD DISPLACE REQUIRED TREES. THE
 TERMINAL ISLAND IS BEING AFFECTED BY UTILITIES AND IS
 WITHIN THE AFFECTED AREA, SO MUST MEET CURRENT CODE
 REQUIREMENTS. THE EXISTING TRIANGLE PALMS SHOULD BE
 REPLACED WITH THE REQUIRED TREE, AND THE WATER LINE
 PLACED TO AVOID THE TREES IN THE LANDSCAPE AREAS.
 THE PRESENCE OF THE UTILITIES WITH ROOT BARRIERS
 SEPARATING THE TREE FROM LARGE AREAS OF THE LANDSCAPE
 ISLAND DOES NOT MEET THE INTENT OF THE CODE TO PROVIDE
 THE ROOT ZONE NEEDED TO SUPPORT A CANOPY TREE.
  
 7. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A
 MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO
 BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING
 AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. AS PROPOSED, THE
 AFFECTED AREA DOES NOT MEET THIS REQUIREMENT.
 SUGGESTIONS INCLUDE TO REMOVE THE PHOENIX CANARIENSIS
 AND REPLACE WITH A CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREE.
 CLUSIA IS A CATEGORY 1 TREE BUT DOES NOT WORK FOR
 CLEARANCES IN THE PARKING AREA AS PLACED. SELECT OTHER
 SPECIES THAT WILL PROVIDE THE TREE CANOPY. ALSO SEE
 COMMENT #6.
  
 8. SATISFIED. THE LANDSCAPE INTERIOR ISLAND ON THE EAST
 SIDE OF BUILDING 2 DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPE
 WIDTH OF 8 FEET WITHIN THE CURB.
  
 9. SATISFIED. FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN OPTIONS CHART
 NEEDS TO BE UPDATED TO CURRENT CODE AND POINTS
 RECALCULATED.
 CHECK ALL ITEMS ON CHART AGAINST CURRENT CODE
 94-442(G).
  
 10. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS
 REQUIRED TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES.
  
 11. SATISFIED. THE EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING AREA
 SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND LANDSCAPE
 AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS
 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4) INCLUDES AREAS THAT CROSS THE
 AFFECTED AREA LINE
  
 12. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL REQUIRED CURBS ADJACENT TO
 LANDSCAPE AREAS PER SECTION 94-443 (C)(5).
 THE AREA ADJACENT TO THE DUMPSTER DOES NOT HAVE A CURB
 FOR PROTECTION. THERE IS ALREADY A CONFLICT WITH THE
 EXISTING TREE ROOT SYSTEM AND THE PAVED AREA.
  
 13. SATISFIED. STAFF SUGGEST AN ADDITIONAL SPECIES BE
 USED FOR THE WEST BUFFER AS THE GEIGER TREES ARE NOT
 THE BEST PERFORMING SPECIES FOR THIS AREA AND LOOK BAD
 FOR A MAJOR PORTION OF THE YEAR.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 1/13/20:
 14. SATISFIED. THE RECONFIGURATION OF THE AREA BEHIND
 BUILDING 1 REQUIRES TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ADJACENT
 TO THE ADA SPACES.
  
 15. SATISFIED. TREE #549 IS NOT SHOWN ON THE TREE
 DISPOSITION PLAN AS BEING REMOVED BUT FALLS WITHIN AN
 AREA PROPOSED TO BE PAVED ON THE SITE PLAN AND
 LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 16. SATISFIED. THE TREE DISPOSITION SUMMARY SHALL BE
 EDITED TO SHOW THE TREES AND CANOPY REMOVED AND TO BE
 REPLACED WITH THE MINOR AMENDMENT AND ALREADY PERMITTED
 AS SEPARATED FROM THE REST OF THE SITE. THE SUMMARY
 SHOULD SHOW SEPARATED INTO 2 PHASES.
  
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-13-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 01-13-2020 Time 17:19 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 01-13-2020 Time 17:19 Sent To  
Notes
2020-01-13 17:20:44FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: SHOPS AT THE PRESS Z19090006
 JANUARY 13, 2020
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. IDENTIFY THE TREES WITHIN THE AFFECTED
 AREA ON THE TREE DISPOSITION TABULAR LIST TO DISCERN
 THEM FROM THE REST OF THE AREAS.
  
 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. LIVE OAK TREES #529 AND #530 ARE STILL
 LISTED AS GOOD CONDITION, SO MUST BE RELOCATED. LIVE
 OAK TREES #567 AND #568 ARE ALSO LISTED IN GOOD
 CONDITION. IF THEY CANNOT BE RELOCATED FOR ANY REASON,
 OR THE CONDITION HAS CHANGED, INDICATE THIS ON THE
 CHART.
  
 3. SATISFIED. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT REMOVAL OF THE
 MATURE BUFFER TREES ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE THAT
 ARE PROVIDING SHADE FOR THE EXISTING SIDEWALK AND
 PROVIDE ALL THE BENEFITS OF A MATURE TREE CANOPY. THE
 APPLICANT SHOULD LOOK AT PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND
 ADJUST THE PROPOSED NORTH CURB LINE TO FIT THE EXISTING
 CURB LINE IN ORDER TO PRESERVE THE EXISTING TREES AND
 MEET THE INTENT OF SECTION 94-448.
  
 4. SATISFIED. THE SITE DATA DOES NOT SHOW THE LANDSCAPE
 AREA FOR THE SITE WITH THE PROPOSED CHANGES. THIS WAS
 BELOW THE REQUIRED 15% ON THE PREVIOUS APPLICATION AND
 MUST BE CORRECTED TO MEET THE CODE REQUIREMENTS.
  
 5. SATISFIED. PROPOSED LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS
 MUST BE SHOWN ON THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. WATER BACKFLOW AND FIRE VALVES
 ARE PROPOSED IN THE SOUTHEAST TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND
 ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS. REQUIRED TREES MUST BE
 INSTALLED IN TERMINAL ISLANDS, SO UTILITIES CANNOT BE
 LOCATED IN POSITIONS THAT WOULD DISPLACE REQUIRED
 TREES. THE TERMINAL ISLAND IS BEING AFFECTED BY
 UTILITIES AND IS WITHIN THE AFFECTED AREA, SO MUST MEET
 CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS. THE EXISTING TRIANGLE PALMS
 SHOULD BE REPLACED WITH THE REQUIRED TREE, AND THE
 WATER LINE PLACED TO AVOID THE TREES IN THE LANDSCAPE
 AREAS.
 THE PRESENCE OF THE UTILITIES WITH ROOT BARRIERS
 SEPARATING THE TREE FROM LARGE AREAS OF THE LANDSCAPE
 ISLAND DOES NOT MEET THE INTENT OF THE CODE TO PROVIDE
 THE ROOT ZONE NEEDED TO SUPPORT A CANOPY TREE.
  
 7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES
 THAT A MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE
 REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF
 STREET PARKING AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. AS
 PROPOSED, THE AFFECTED AREA DOES NOT MEET THIS
 REQUIREMENT. SUGGESTIONS INCLUDE TO REMOVE THE PHOENIX
 CANARIENSIS AND REPLACE WITH A CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREE.
 CLUSIA IS A CATEGORY 1 TREE BUT DOES NOT WORK FOR
 CLEARANCES IN THE PARKING AREA AS PLACED. SELECT OTHER
 SPECIES THAT WILL PROVIDE THE TREE CANOPY. ALSO SEE
 COMMENT #6.
  
 8. SATISFIED. THE LANDSCAPE INTERIOR ISLAND ON THE EAST
 SIDE OF BUILDING 2 DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPE
 WIDTH OF 8 FEET WITHIN THE CURB.
  
 9. NOT SATISFIED. FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN OPTIONS CHART
 NEEDS TO BE UPDATED TO CURRENT CODE AND POINTS
 RECALCULATED.
 CHECK ALL ITEMS ON CHART AGAINST CURRENT CODE
 94-442(G).
  
 10. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS
 REQUIRED TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES.
  
 11. SATISFIED. THE EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING AREA
 SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND LANDSCAPE
 AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS
 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4) INCLUDES AREAS THAT CROSS THE
 AFFECTED AREA LINE
  
 12. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW ALL REQUIRED CURBS
 ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPE AREAS PER SECTION 94-443 (C)(5).
 THE AREA ADJACENT TO THE DUMPSTER DOES NOT HAVE A CURB
 FOR PROTECTION. THERE IS ALREADY A CONFLICT WITH THE
 EXISTING TREE ROOT SYSTEM AND THE PAVED AREA.
  
 13. SATISFIED. STAFF SUGGEST AN ADDITIONAL SPECIES BE
 USED FOR THE WEST BUFFER AS THE GEIGER TREES ARE NOT
 THE BEST PERFORMING SPECIES FOR THIS AREA AND LOOK BAD
 FOR A MAJOR PORTION OF THE YEAR.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 1/13/20:
 14. THE RECONFIGURATION OF THE AREA BEHIND BUILDING 1
 REQUIRES TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ADJACENT TO THE ADA
 SPACES.
  
 15. TREE #549 IS NOT SHOWN ON THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN
 AS BEING REMOVED BUT FALLS WITHIN AN AREA PROPOSED TO
 BE PAVED ON THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 16. THE TREE DISPOSITION SUMMARY SHALL BE EDITED TO
 SHOW THE TREES AND CANOPY REMOVED AND TO BE REPLACED
 WITH THE MINOR AMENDMENT AND ALREADY PERMITTED AS
 SEPARATED FROM THE REST OF THE SITE. THE SUMMARY SHOULD
 SHOW SEPARATED INTO 2 PHASES.
  
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-07-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 10-07-2019 Time 17:20 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 10-07-2019 Time 17:20 Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-07 17:20:33FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: SHOPS AT THE PRESS Z19090006
 OCTOBER 7, 2019
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. IDENTIFY THE TREES WITHIN THE AFFECTED AREA ON THE
 TREE DISPOSITION TABULAR LIST TO DISCERN THEM FROM THE
 REST OF THE AREAS.
  
 2. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES IN GOOD
 CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. LIVE
 OAK TREES #529 AND #530 ARE STILL LISTED AS GOOD
 CONDITION, SO MUST BE RELOCATED. LIVE OAK TREES #567
 AND #568 ARE ALSO LISTED IN GOOD CONDITION. IF THEY
 CANNOT BE RELOCATED FOR ANY REASON, OR THE CONDITION
 HAS CHANGED, INDICATE THIS ON THE CHART.
  
 3. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT REMOVAL OF THE MATURE BUFFER
 TREES ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE THAT ARE PROVIDING
 SHADE FOR THE EXISTING SIDEWALK AND PROVIDE ALL THE
 BENEFITS OF A MATURE TREE CANOPY. THE APPLICANT SHOULD
 LOOK AT PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND ADJUST THE PROPOSED
 NORTH CURB LINE TO FIT THE EXISTING CURB LINE IN ORDER
 TO PRESERVE THE EXISTING TREES AND MEET THE INTENT OF
 SECTION 94-448.
  
 4. THE SITE DATA DOES NOT SHOW THE LANDSCAPE AREA FOR
 THE SITE WITH THE PROPOSED CHANGES. THIS WAS BELOW THE
 REQUIRED 15% ON THE PREVIOUS APPLICATION AND MUST BE
 CORRECTED TO MEET THE CODE REQUIREMENTS.
  
 5. PROPOSED LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS MUST BE SHOWN
 ON THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 6. WATER BACKFLOW AND FIRE VALVES ARE PROPOSED IN THE
 SOUTHEAST TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND ON THE ENGINEERING
 PLANS. REQUIRED TREES MUST BE INSTALLED IN TERMINAL
 ISLANDS, SO UTILITIES CANNOT BE LOCATED IN POSITIONS
 THAT WOULD DISPLACE REQUIRED TREES. THE TERMINAL ISLAND
 IS BEING AFFECTED BY UTILITIES AND IS WITHIN THE
 AFFECTED AREA, SO MUST MEET CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS.
 THE EXISTING TRIANGLE PALMS SHOULD BE REPLACED WITH THE
 REQUIRED TREE, AND THE WATER LINE PLACED TO AVOID THE
 TREES IN THE LANDSCAPE AREAS.
  
 7. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A MINIMUM OF 75
 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED
 WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING AREA SHALL
 BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. AS PROPOSED, THE AFFECTED
 AREA DOES NOT MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. SUGGESTIONS
 INCLUDE TO REMOVE THE PHOENIX CANARIENSIS AND REPLACE
 WITH A CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREE.
 8. THE LANDSCAPE INTERIOR ISLAND ON THE EAST SIDE OF
 BUILDING 2 DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPE WIDTH OF
 8 FEET WITHIN THE CURB.
  
 9. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS REQUIRED TO
 PROTECT UTILITY LINES.
  
 10. THE EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING AREA SURFACE
 CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND LANDSCAPE AREAS
 PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 94-443
 (C)(3) AND (4) INCLUDES AREAS THAT CROSS THE AFFECTED
 AREA LINE
  
 11. SHOW ALL REQUIRED CURBS ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPE AREAS
 PER SECTION 94-443 (C)(5).
  
 12. STAFF SUGGEST AN ADDITIONAL SPECIES BE USED FOR THE
 WEST BUFFER AS THE GEIGER TREES ARE NOT THE BEST
 PERFORMING SPECIES FOR THIS AREA AND LOOK BAD FOR A
 MAJOR PORTION OF THE YEAR.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 3 Status P Date 01-29-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 01-29-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 01-29-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-01-29 15:17:05(AMENDMENT REVIEW COMMENTS) APPROVED WITH THE
 CONDITIONS BELOW:
  
 1- THE RADII AT THE BACKING OUT TO EXIT THE BUILDING #1
 COVERED PARKING AREA ALSO ON BOTH SIDES TO BE
 INCREASED.
 2- BOTH RADII AT THE EXIT TO BE INCREASED TO ALLOW
 EXITING STARBUCKS (BUILDING #2) EITHER EAST BOUND OR
 WEST BOUND FOR OUR SANITATION FRONT LOADER TRUCK.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 2 Status P Date 12-30-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 12-30-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 12-30-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-12-30 15:27:16 
 NO FURTHER COMMENTS FROM DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 10-09-2019 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 10-09-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-09 10:47:53PROPOSED LOCATION FOR THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, AS
 PRESENTED ON SP-1, FOR BOTH LOCATIONS (BLDG. #2 AND
 BLDG. #1 IS NOT FEASIBLE FOR THE FRONT LOADER
 SANITATION TRUCK TO ACCESS AND SERVICE SAFELY. PLEASE
 CONSIDER THE FOLLOWINGS:
 O RELOCATION OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES
 O REORIENTATION OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status P Date 01-30-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 01-30-2020 Time 19:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 01-30-2020 Time 19:58 Sent To  
Notes
2020-01-30 19:57:46THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 1/27/2020 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE AND THE COMMENTS CAN BE
 ADDRESSED DURING ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION:
  
 1. THERE IS AN EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM THAT APPEARS TO
 HAVE TWO CONTROL STRUCTURES - WEIR IN THE CATCH BASIN
 AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE AND WEIR IN THE CATCH
 BASIN ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE, SOUTH OF THE
 PROPOSED DUMPSTER LOCATION. THE WESTERN CONTROL
 STRUCTURE WILL PREVENT STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THE TWO
 NORTHERN EXISTING CATCH BASINS FROM REACHING THE
 EXFILTRATION TRENCH. ADVISE IF THE WESTERN CONTROL
 STRUCTURE IS NEEDED.
  
 2. THIS EXISTING SYSTEM IS CONNECTED TO THE BELVEDERE
 ROAD DRAINAGE SYSTEM. THIS ROADWAY DRAINAGE SYSTEM IS
 EITHER MAINTAINED BY FDOT OR PALM BEACH COUNTY. OBTAIN
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FROM THE APPROPRIATE ENTITY TO CONTINUE
 THIS DRAINAGE CONNECTION.
  
 3. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PROPOSED GRADES IN THE DRIVEWAY
 PAVER AREA ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF THE SITE SHOWING THE
 CENTER OF THE PAVER AREA IS LOWER THAN THE EDGE OF
 PAVEMENT ALONG THE OUTER CURB AND THAT RUNOFF WILL NOT
 FLOW FROM THE DRIVEWAY AREA TO THE SIDEWALK OPENINGS ON
 THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE.
  
 4. PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE PERVIOUS PAVER DESIGN.
  
 5. STAFF SUGGESTS ADDING BAFFLES IN CB#1 QND CB#2 TO
 EXTEND THE LIFE OF THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH. THESE
 STRUCTURES MAY NOT SEE MUCH SURFACE RUNOFF DUE TO BEING
 LOCATED WITHIHN THE PERVIOUS PAVER AREA BUT THE BAFFLES
 WILL KEEP SOME FLOATABLES AND SEDIMENT OUT OF THE
 EXFILTRATION TRENCH.
  
 TRACY WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-08-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 10-08-2019 Time 16:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 10-08-2019 Time 16:38 Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-08 16:38:24THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
  
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
 MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. WHERE DOES THE 15" RCP LEAVING THE SITE CONNECT TO?
 IS THERE A DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR THIS PIPE AND/OR THE
 REST OF THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM?
  
 2. EXFILTRATION TRENCH MAY NEED TO BE REPLACED OR
 CERTIFIED BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER THAT IT IS
 FUNCTIONING PROPERLY.
  
 3. INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE DRAINAGE CONTROL
 STRUCTURE AND PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE WEIR
 ELEVATION, RIM ELEVATION, ETC.
  
 4. CONVERSION EQUATION BETWEEN NAVD1988 AND NGVD1929
 SHOULD MATCH ON THE SURVEY AND ENGINEERING PLANS.
  
 5. BELVEDERE ROAD IS MAINTAINED BY PALM BEACH COUNTY.
 ANY WORK WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY WILL REQUIRE A PERMIT
 FROM THE COUNTY.
  
 6. SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY IS MAINTAINED BY FDOT. ANY WORK
 WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY WILL REQUIRE A PERMIT FROM
 FDOT.
  
 7. EXPLAIN WHAT ARE THE MARKINGS THAT APPEAR TO BE
 CROSS WALK STRIPING.
  
 8. EXPLAIN/LABEL THE ASPHALT CONNECTIONS TO BELVEDERE
 ROAD.
  
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
 THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS
 CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE
 ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED
 WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP PERMIT MODIFICATION
 PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-08-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 10-08-2019 Time 07:29 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-08 07:29:211. WHAT ARE THE 2 TURNOUTS ONTO BELVEDERE?
 2. WHAT IS THE WIDTH OF THE FPL EASEMENT ALONG WEST
 PROPERTY LINE? SHOW ON ALL PLANS.
 3. IS THIS SUBMITTAL ALSO FOR AN OVERALL LANDSCAPE
 PLAN?
 4. DUMPSTER LOCATION AND ORIENTATION WILL REQUIRE
 PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 5 Status P Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 02-19-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-02-19 10:32:58(REVISED COMMENTS PER DISCUSSION AND REVISED TRAFFIC
 STUDY)
  
 PASSED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
  
 1. PROVIDE A BUS SHELTER ON DIXIE HIGHWAY.
 2. PROVIDE MEDIAN FOR SAFETY AT MONCEAUX ROAD AND THE
 RAILROAD TRACK CROSSING DURING TO INCREASED TRAFFIC PER
 THE TRAFFIC STUDY.
 3. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING TRANSPORTATION DEMAND
 MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES AS INDICATED IN THE SUBMITTED
 TDM PLAN AND OTHER TDM MEASURES TO MITIGATE TRAFFIC
 IMPACT. AVAILABLE DATA FROM THESE TDM MEASURES SHOULD
 BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY ANNUALLY.
 A. IMPLEMENT ?PREFERRED PARKING? PROGRAM FOR CARPOOLERS
 WITH A MINIMUM OF 5 SPACES.
 B. RESERVE SPACE FOR FUTURE MICROMOBILITY FACILITIES TO
 BE LOCATED EAST OF THE RAILROAD TRACK.
 C. EXPLORE OPTION TO PROVIDE MICRO-TRANSIT TO THE SITE.
 4. MODIFY THE SITE PLAN TO MAINTAIN SIDEWALK LEVEL
 ACROSS ALL DRIVEWAYS DURING PERMITTING.
 5. PROVIDE 10-FOOT SIDEWALK ALONG SITE FRONTAGE ON
 BELVEDERE ROAD.
 6. CLOSE THE PRIVATE RAILROAD CROSSING AND PROVIDE
 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ACROSS THE PRIVATE RAILROAD CROSSING.
 MODIFY THE SITE PLAN ASSOCIATED WITH THE RAILROAD
 CROSSING CLOSURE.
  
  
 SHING TSOI
 CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
 561-494-1141
 [email protected]
 (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS)
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 4 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 02-12-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-02-12 09:41:29TRAFFIC STUDY COMMENTS:
 1. THE RESULTS IN TABLE 10 ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE
 HCS ANALYSES. PLEASE VERIFY AND REVISE. PLEASE PROVIDE
 MITIGATION MEASURES AS SIGNIFICANT HIGH DELAY ON THE
 MINOR MOVEMENTS MAY INTRODUCE POTENTIALLY UNSAFE
 DRIVING BEHAVIOR IMPACTING PUBLIC SAFETY ON DIXIE
 HIGHWAY.
 CONDITIONS:
 1. PROVIDE A BUS SHELTER ON DIXIE HIGHWAY FOLLOWING THE
 CITY?S BUS SHELTER DESIGN IF THE BUS SHELTER IS NOT
 DESIGNED BY AN ARTIST.
 2. PROVIDE MEDIAN OR QUAD GATES AND STREET LIGHTING FOR
 SAFETY AT MONCEAUX ROAD AND THE RAILROAD TRACK
 CROSSING.
 3. MILL AND RESURFACE MONCEAUX ROAD FROM SOUTH DIXIE
 HIGHWAY TO GEORGIA AVENUE PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE
 FIRST CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.
 4. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING TRANSPORTATION DEMAND
 MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES AS INDICATED IN THE SUBMITTED
 TDM PLAN AND OTHER TDM MEASURES TO MITIGATE TRAFFIC
 IMPACT. MONITORING OF THESE TDM MEASURES SHOULD BE
 PROVIDED TO THE CITY ANNUALLY.
 A. PROVIDE SHOWER AND LOCKER FACILITY ON-SITE FOR ALL
 EMPLOYEES.
 B. IMPLEMENT ?PREFERRED PARKING? PROGRAM FOR
 CARPOOLERS.
 C. PROVIDE FREE TRANSIT PASS TO EMPLOYEES.
 D. RESERVE SPACE FOR FUTURE MICROMOBILITY FACILITIES.
 E. MAKE CONTRIBUTION TO CITY?S TRANSIT OPERATING FUND
 INSTEAD OF PROVIDING PRIVATE SHUTTLE SERVICES
 5. MAINTAIN GENERAL PUBLIC ACCESS TO AND PARKING ON THE
 PARKING LOT.
 6. MAINTAIN SIDEWALK LEVEL ACROSS ALL DRIVEWAYS.
 7. PROVIDE 10-FOOT SIDEWALK ALONG SITE FRONTAGE ON
 BELVEDERE ROAD.
  
  
 SHING TSOI
 CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
 561-494-1141
 [email protected]
 (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS)
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 01-30-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-01-30 16:25:40SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
 1. MAJOR AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT OF SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
 (DSI) IS REQUIRED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL ELEMENTS OF
 THE CITY?S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. PLEASE INCREASE THE
 SIDEWALK WIDTH TO A TOTAL OF 10-FOOT ALONG SITE
 FRONTAGE ON BELVEDERE ROAD TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE
 CITY?S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
  
  
 TRAFFIC STUDY COMMENTS:
 2. THE DRIVEWAY VOLUMES SHOWN IN THE VOLUME DEVELOPMENT
 WORKSHEET AND THE HCS ANALYSES DO NOT APPEAR TO INCLUDE
 EXISTING DRIVEWAY VOLUMES AND ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH
 DRIVEWAY VOLUMES IN FIGURE 4. PLEASE VERIFY AND REVISE.
 PLEASE PROVIDE MITIGATION MEASURES AS SIGNIFICANT HIGH
 DELAY ON THE MINOR MOVEMENTS MAY INTRODUCE POTENTIALLY
 UNSAFE DRIVING BEHAVIOR IMPACTING PUBLIC SAFETY ON
 DIXIE HIGHWAY.
  
  
 CONDITIONS:
 1. PROVIDE A BUS SHELTER ON DIXIE HIGHWAY FOLLOWING THE
 CITY?S BUS SHELTER DESIGN IF THE BUS SHELTER IS NOT
 DESIGNED BY AN ARTIST.
 2. PROVIDE MEDIAN OR QUAD GATES AND STREET LIGHTING FOR
 SAFETY AT MONCEAUX ROAD AND THE RAILROAD TRACK
 CROSSING.
 3. MILL AND RESURFACE MONCEAUX ROAD FROM SOUTH DIXIE
 HIGHWAY TO GEORGIA AVENUE PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE
 FIRST CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.
 4. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING TRANSPORTATION DEMAND
 MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES AS INDICATED IN THE SUBMITTED
 TDM PLAN AND OTHER TDM MEASURES TO MITIGATE TRAFFIC
 IMPACT. MONITORING OF THESE TDM MEASURES SHOULD BE
 PROVIDED TO THE CITY ANNUALLY.
 A. PROVIDE SHOWER AND LOCKER FACILITY ON-SITE FOR ALL
 EMPLOYEES.
 B. IMPLEMENT ?PREFERRED PARKING? PROGRAM FOR
 CARPOOLERS.
 C. PROVIDE FREE TRANSIT PASS TO EMPLOYEES.
 D. RESERVE SPACE FOR FUTURE MICROMOBILITY FACILITIES.
 E. MAKE CONTRIBUTION TO CITY?S TRANSIT OPERATING FUND
 INSTEAD OF PROVIDING PRIVATE SHUTTLE SERVICES
 5. MAINTAIN GENERAL PUBLIC ACCESS TO AND PARKING ON THE
 PARKING LOT.
 6. MAINTAIN SIDEWALK LEVEL ACROSS ALL DRIVEWAYS.
  
  
 SHING TSOI
 CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
 561-494-1141
 [email protected]
 (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS)
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 01-15-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-01-15 15:24:29SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
 1. INCREASE THE SIDEWALK WIDTH TO A TOTAL OF 10-FOOT
 ALONG SITE FRONTAGE ON BELVEDERE ROAD.
 2. REMOVE THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ON BELVEDERE ROAD
 CLOSEST TO DIXIE HIGHWAY.
 3. CONSIDER PROVIDING DISTINCTION FOR THE CORNER AREA
 IN FRONT OF THE PEDESTRIAN PLAZA, E.G. BY RAISING THE
 CORNER AREA, TO PROVIDE WARNINGS TO DRIVERS OF
 PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITIES AND TO SLOW DOWN VEHICLES AT THAT
 LOCATION.
 4. CLARIFY THE TYPE AND SIZE OF THE BUS SHELTER
 PROPOSED ON DIXIE HIGHWAY. THE APPLICANT HAS PREVIOUSLY
 INDICATED THAT THE BUS SHELTER WOULD BE DESIGNED BY AN
 ARTIST.
 5. PLEASE MAINTAIN SIDEWALK LEVEL ACROSS ALL DRIVEWAYS.
  
  
 TRAFFIC STUDY COMMENTS:
 6. PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED COUNTY TPS LETTER.
 7. IN THE DRIVE-THROUGH QUEUING ANALYSIS, THE
 CALCULATION APPEARS TO INCLUDE THE PROBABILITY WHEN THE
 QUEUE LENGTH IS 9 VEHICLES, BUT DOES NOT APPEAR TO
 ACCOUNT FOR THE PROBABILITY OF QUEUES EQUAL TO OR
 LONGER THAN 10 VEHICLES. PLEASE VERIFY AND REVISE.
 8. DIXIE HIGHWAY/DRIVEWAY 3 IS EXPERIENCING VERY HIGH
 EGRESS DELAY ESPECIALLY DURING PM PEAK HOUR WITH 175
 EASTBOUND LEFT-TURN VEHICLES PER HOUR. PLEASE PROVIDE
 MITIGATION MEASURES AS SIGNIFICANT HIGH DELAY ON THE
 MINOR MOVEMENTS MAY INTRODUCE POTENTIALLY UNSAFE
 DRIVING BEHAVIOR IMPACTING PUBLIC SAFETY ON DIXIE
 HIGHWAY.
 9. FOR INTERSECTION ANALYSES, COMMITTED TRIPS SHOULD BE
 BASED ON THE INTERSECTION VOLUME REPORT FROM THE
 COUNTY?S TPS WHEN AVAILABLE.
 10. PLEASE CONSIDER USING OPTIMIZED SIGNAL TIMING AT
 INTERSECTIONS WITH HIGH DELAY AND INCORPORATE THE
 POTENTIAL TRAFFIC DIVERSION ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY
 UNDER LANE ELIMINATION SCENARIO IN THE ANALYSIS AS
 APPLICABLE. THE POTENTIAL TRAFFIC DIVERSION CAN BE
 REFERRED TO THE APPROVED SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY LANE
 ELIMINATION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND IS AVAILABLE UPON
 REQUEST.
 11. THERE ARE SEVERAL EDITORIAL ERRORS WHICH ARE
 IMPACTING REVIEW, E.G. REPETITIVE INTERSECTIONS ARE
 LISTED ON PAGE 3, MULTIPLE INTERSECTIONS ARE LABELED AS
 GEORGIA AVENUE/MONCEAUX ROAD IN THE VOLUME DEVELOPMENT
 SHEET, INTERSECTION NAMES ARE NOT INDICATED ON SOME
 SYNCHRO OUTPUTS, ETC. PLEASE VERIFY AND REVISE.
  
  
 CONDITIONS:
 1. PROVIDE A BUS SHELTER ON DIXIE HIGHWAY.
 2. PROVIDE MEDIAN OR QUAD GATES AND STREET LIGHTING FOR
 SAFETY AT MONCEAUX ROAD AND THE RAILROAD TRACK
 CROSSING.
 3. MILL AND RESURFACE MONCEAUX ROAD FROM SOUTH DIXIE
 HIGHWAY TO GEORGIA AVENUE.
 4. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING TRANSPORTATION DEMAND
 MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES AS INDICATED IN THE SUBMITTED
 TDM PLAN AND OTHER TDM MEASURES TO MITIGATE TRAFFIC
 IMPACT. MONITORING OF THESE TDM MEASURES SHOULD BE
 PROVIDED TO THE CITY ANNUALLY.
 A. PROVIDE SHOWER AND LOCKER FACILITY ON-SITE FOR ALL
 EMPLOYEES.
 B. IMPLEMENT "PREFERRED PARKING" PROGRAM FOR
 CARPOOLERS.
 C. PROVIDE FREE TRANSIT PASS TO EMPLOYEES.
 D. RESERVE SPACE FOR FUTURE MICROMOBILITY FACILITIES.
 E. MAKE CONTRIBUTION TO CITY?S TRANSIT OPERATING FUND
 INSTEAD OF PROVIDING PRIVATE SHUTTLE SERVICES
 5. OPEN UP THE PARKING LOT TO GENERAL PUBLIC USE.
  
  
  
 SHING TSOI
 CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
 561-494-1141
 [email protected]
 (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS)
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 10-08-2019 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-08 16:43:35SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
 1. RECORD CROSS-ACCESS EASEMENTS ALONG THE NORTHERN
 BOUNDARY OF THE PROPERTY AND THE PARKING LOT WEST OF
 THE RAILROAD WITH ADJACENT PROPERTIES. THE EASEMENT
 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE WHEN THE NORTHERN PROPERTIES
 RE-DEVELOP AND CAN ONLY BE TERMINATED OR AMENDED WITH
 CITY'S APPROVAL.
 2. PLEASE CONSIDER BUILDING A WALK-UP COFFEE SHOP,
 REMOVING THE DRIVE-THROUGH LANE AND REDUCING THE
 SETBACK TO MINIMUM REQUIRED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE
 URBAN CONTEXT SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY IS TRANSFORMED INTO.
 3. PROVIDE 12-FOOT SIDEWALK WITH 4-FOOT LANDSCAPE
 BUFFER AND SHADE TREES ALONG SITE FRONTAGE ON BELVEDERE
 ROAD.
 4. PROVIDE WALKABLE SPACE IN FRONT OF THE SIGN WALL AT
 THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE BELVEDERE ROAD/DIXIE
 HIGHWAY INTERSECTION, AND PROVIDE SIDEWALK EASEMENT FOR
 THE AREA IN FRONT OF THE SIGN WALL.
 TRAFFIC STUDY COMMENTS:
 5. THE LAND USE INTENSITIES USED FOR THE TRAFFIC STUDY
 ARE DIFFERENT THAN SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE
 REVISE.
 6. THE LAND USE INTENSITIES AND TRIPS SHOWN IN THE JUNE
 13, 2019 COUNTY TPS LETTER ARE LOWER THAN IN THE
 TRAFFIC STUDY. PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED COUNTY TPS
 LETTER.
 7. SOME OF THE TRIP GENERATION RATES AND INBOUND TRIP
 PERCENTAGES ARE DIFFERENT THAN SHOWN IN THE PALM BEACH
 COUNTY TRIP GENERATION RATE TABLE. FOR EXAMPLE, HEALTH
 CLUB TRIP GENERATION RATES, GENERAL OFFICE INBOUND TRIP
 PERCENTAGES, AND RETAIL PASS-BY PERCENTAGE. PLEASE
 VERIFY AND REVISE.
 8. PLEASE CLARIFY THE REDEVELOPMENT CREDIT
 CALCULATIONS. THE CHANGE IN GENERAL OFFICE
 SQUARE-FOOTAGE IS 54,660 SF BUT A REDEVELOPMENT CREDIT
 IS CLAIMED FOR 86,660 SF OF OFFICE USE.
 9. 25% TO 40% OF TRIPS ARE EXPECTED TO TRAVEL THROUGH
 MONCEAUX ROAD. PLEASE EVALUATE THE TRAFFIC IMPACT TO
 THE NEIGHBORHOOD ALONG GEORGIA AVENUE AND MONCEAUX
 ROAD. PLEASE DISCUSS THE OPINIONS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD
 RELATED TO THIS TRAFFIC IMPACT.
 10. PLEASE VERIFY THE 15% TRIPS ASSIGNED ON GEORGIA
 AVENUE AND SOUTHERN BOULEVARD. SOUTHERN BOULEVARD IS
 GRADE SEPARATED FROM GEORGIA AVENUE.
 11. PLEASE JUSTIFY IF IT IS REASONABLE THAT 50% OF
 TRIPS WOULD USE THE PARKING LOT WEST OF THE RAILROAD
 TRACK WHILE THIS PARKING LOT IS THE FURTHEST AWAY FROM
 THE ENTRANCE OF ALL USES.
 12. THE LOS RESULTS ON TABLE 6 ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH
 THE RESULTS SHOWN IN THE HCS OUTPUT SHEETS. PLEASE
 REVISE
 13. PLEASE INCLUDE LOS ANALYSIS USING HIGHWAY CAPACITY
 MANUAL (HCM) 6TH EDITION METHODOLOGY AT THE FOLLOWING
 INTERSECTIONS:
 A. US 1/BELVEDERE ROAD
 B. US 1/SOUTHERN BOULEVARD
 C. US 1/MONCEAUX ROAD
 D. GEORGIA AVENUE/MONCEAUX ROAD
 E. GEORGIA AVENUE/BELVEDERE ROAD
 F. US 1/ALL THREE SITE ACCESSES
 14. PROVIDE QUEUING ANALYSIS FOR THE COFFEE SHOP
 DRIVE-THROUGH AND VERIFY THE QUEUES WOULD NOT BACK UP
 ONTO THE DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE.
 15. PLEASE CONSIDER MAKING CONTRIBUTION TO CITY TROLLEY
 INSTEAD OF PROVIDING PRIVATE SHUTTLE SERVICES.
 16. PLEASE CONSIDER RESERVING SPACE FOR FUTURE
 MICROMOBILITY FACILITIES.
 17. PLEASE CONSIDER OPENING UP THE PARKING LOT TO
 GENERAL PUBLIC USE.
 18. MAINTAIN SIDEWALK LEVEL ACROSS ALL DRIVEWAYS.
 CONDITIONS:
 1. PROVIDE A BUS SHELTER ON DIXIE HIGHWAY.
 2. PROVIDE MEDIAN OR QUAD GATES AND STREET LIGHTING FOR
 SAFETY AT MONCEAUX ROAD AND THE RAILROAD TRACK
 CROSSING.
 3. MILL AND RESURFACE MONCEAUX ROAD FROM SOUTH DIXIE
 HIGHWAY TO GEORGIA AVENUE.
 4. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING TRANSPORTATION DEMAND
 MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES AS INDICATED IN THE SUBMITTED
 TDM PLAN:
 A. PROVIDE SHOWER AND LOCKER FACILITY ON-SITE FOR ALL
 EMPLOYEES.
 B. IMPLEMENT ?PREFERRED PARKING? PROGRAM FOR
 CARPOOLERS.
 C. PROVIDE FREE TRANSIT PASS TO EMPLOYEES.
  
  
 SHING TSOI
 CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
 561-494-1141
 [email protected]
 (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS)
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 01-27-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 01-27-2020 Time 14:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 01-27-2020 Time 14:55 Sent To  
Notes
2020-01-27 14:56:13PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 01.27.2020
 PROJECT NO.: Z19090006
 CASE NO.: PB 1086C
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. [ SATISFIED ] - WITH ALL OF THE ADDITIONAL DETAIL,
 NOTES, LABELS, ETC. THE SITE PLAN NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED
 AT A LARGER SCALE. PROVIDE AN OVERALL SITE PLAN, BUT
 THEN DO ENLARGED SHEETS WITH MATCHLINES.
  
 2. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - STAFF WOULD LIKE TO
 CONTINUE TO LOOK INTO ALTERNATIVE SITE PLAN DESIGNS
 THAT PRESENT A MORE URBAN FEEL WITH BUILDING PRESENCE
 ON THE STREET, PARKING BEHIND, PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCES
 DIRECTLY FROM THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK INTO THE BUILDING,
 RELOCATION OF THE DUMPSTER AWAY FROM THE MAIN
 THOROUGHFARE, ETC.
  
 2.1. [ FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ] - PLEASE NOTE THAT
 STAFF WILL LIKELY DISCUSS THE ALTERNATIVE DESIGN, ETC.
 AS PART OF THE FUTURE STAFF REPORT.
  
 3. [ SATISFIED ] - AN APPROVAL TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY
 LETTER SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY.
  
 4. [ SATISFIED ] - THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT NEEDS TO
 BE CLEARER ABOUT THE SCOPE OF THE MAJOR AMENDMENT. FOR
 EXAMPLE, IN THE SECTION UNDER ?SITE DESIGN? IT IS
 DESCRIBING IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE A PART OF THE MINOR
 AMENDMENT, BUT THE DESCRIPTION MAKES IT SOUND LIKE THEY
 ARE PROPOSED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION.
  
 5. [ SATISFIED BY CONDITION OF APPROVAL ] - REPLAT OF
 THE PROPERTY WILL BE REQUIRED.
  
 6. [ SATISFIED BY CONDITION OF APPROVAL ] - UNITY OF
 CONTROL WILL BE REQUIRED.
  
 7. [ SATISFIED ] - ALL PLANS NEED TO REFLECT THE SCOPE
 OF WORK NECESSARY TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED TRUCK
 ROUTE.
  
 8. [ SATISFIED ] - UPDATED FDOT LETTER SHALL BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 9. [ SATISFIED ] - PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THE UTILITY
 LETTERS PROVIDED REFLECT THEIR REVIEW OF THE SCOPE OF
 THE MAJOR AMENDMENT; IT APPEARS THAT SOME OF THE
 LETTERS ARE DATED THE SAME AS THOSE THAT WERE PROVIDED
 AS PART OF THE MINOR AMENDMENT APPLICATION.
  
 9.1. [ SATISFIED ] - RESPONSES TO YOUR AUGUST 21, 2019,
 REQUESTS SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM EACH OF THE UTILITY
 COMPANIES.
  
 10. [ SATISFIED ] - AT THE NEW DRIVE-THRU RESTAURANT,
 PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THERE ARE GATES ACROSS THE
 PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS. THE GATES SHALL BE REMOVED AND
 THERE SHALL BE CLEAR PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN
 THE PUBLIC WALKWAY AND THE BUSINESS.
  
 11. [ SATISFIED ] - ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS RESULTING
 FROM COMMENTS/REVIEW OF THE MINOR AMENDMENT SHALL BE
 REFLECTED ON THE PLANS FOR THE MAJOR AMENDMENT.
  
 12. [ SATISFIED ] - AS ADDITIONAL COMMENTS HAVE BEEN
 PROVIDED FOR THE MINOR AMENDMENT, ANY MODIFICATIONS TO
 THE PLAN RESULTING FROM SUCH WILL NEED TO BE
 INCORPORATED INTO THE MAJOR AMENDMENT PLANS.
  
 13. [ SATISFIED ] - THE USES AND SQUARE FOOTAGES IN THE
 TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT DO NOT MATCH THAT WHICH IS
 SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN.
  
 14. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - SIZE, LOCATION, AND
 ORIENTATION OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE NEEDS TO BE
 APPROVED BY THE CITY?S PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.
  
 14.1. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - THE TURNING MOVEMENTS SHOWN
 ON THE SITE PLAN AND IN THE EXHIBIT ONLY SHOW THE TRUCK
 MOVEMENTS ENTERING TO PICK UP THE DUMPSTER; NO
 MOVEMENTS ARE SHOWN ON HOW THE TRUCK IS EXITING THE
 SITE. THIS COMMENT IS APPLICABLE TO THE DUMPSTER
 NORTHWEST OF BUILDING 2, AS WELL AS NORTHWEST OF
 BUILDING 1.
  
 14.1.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] ? THE TURNING STUDY EXHIBIT
 STILL DOES NOT SHOW MOVEMENTS FOR THE TRUCK AFTER
 PICKING UP THE DUMPSTER AT BUILDING 2. I DO NOT BELIEVE
 THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT WILL APPROVE THE TRUCK
 BACKING UP THE ENTIRE WAY. PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN
 CONFIRMATION FROM THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT THAT SUCH
 MOVEMENTS WILL BE ACCEPTABLE, AND THAT THE PROPOSED
 MOVEMENTS AND CLEARANCES FOR BUILDING 1 ARE ACCEPTABLE.
  
 15. [ SATISFIED ] - PLEASE EXPLAIN THE NEED FOR A
 BYPASS LANE ALONG THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE DRIVE-THRU.
  
 16. [ SATISFIED ] - SETBACKS LISTED AS ?REQUIRED? IN
 THE SITE DATA TABLE APPEAR TO BE INCORRECT.
  
 17. [ SATISFIED BY CONDITION OF APPROVAL ] - THE SITE
 PLAN FOR THE DRIVE-THRU SHOWS PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS
 COMING OFF OF BELVEDERE ROAD AND SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY
 WITH NO CLEAR PASSAGE TO THE BUILDING. THE CONNECTIONS
 ARE SHOWN DEAD-ENDING INTO PARKING SPACES, RANDOM
 CROSSINGS AT THE DRIVE-THRU, ETC.
  
 17.1. [ CONDITION OF APPROVAL ] - APPROPRIATE PAVEMENT
 MARKINGS SHOULD BE PROVIDED WHERE PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC
 CROSSES THE DRIVE-THRU AND DRIVE AISLES.
  
 18. [ SATISFIED ] - DIMENSIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED OF THE
 PARKING AND DRIVE AISLES AT THE DRIVE-THRU RESTAURANT.
  
 19. [ SATISFIED BY CONDITION OF APPROVAL ] - THE CIVIL
 PLANS SHOW THE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS ON BELVEDERE ROAD
 AS ASPHALT. PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS SHOULD BE CLEARLY
 DELINEATED WITH DIFFERENT MATERIALS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS,
 ETC. SO THAT THERE IS A CLEAR AND SAFE ROUTE BETWEEN
 THE PUBLIC WALKWAY AND THE BUILDING. AS DESIGNED, THEY
 LOOK LIKE DRIVEWAY APPROACHES.
  
 19.1. [ CONDITION OF APPROVAL ] - SEE COMMENT 17.1
 ABOVE.
  
 20. [ SATISFIED ] - IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT WHEN PARKING
 ROWS ABUT A LANDSCAPE BUFFER, THAT WHEEL STOPS NOT BE
 USED AND THAT THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER BE WIDENED TO
 ACCOMMODATE THE VEHICLE OVERHANG.
  
 20.1. [ SATISFIED ] - NOTE THAT IMPLEMENTING THE
 COMMENT ABOVE WOULD NOT HAVE REDUCED THE OVERALL LENGTH
 OF THE SPACE, IT WOULD HAVE SIMPLY ALLOWED THE VEHICLE
 TO OVERHANG LANDSCAPE AREA AS OPPOSED TO ADDITIONAL
 ASPHALT/PAVERS. AS CURRENTLY DESIGNED, ALL SPACES WILL
 BE REQUIRED TO HAVE WHEEL STOPS.
  
 21. [ SATISFIED ] - THE CIVIL PLANS DO NOT APPEAR TO
 CORRECTLY DEPICT WHAT IS PROPOSED TO BE PAVERS,
 CONCRETE, LANDSCAPE, ETC.
  
 21.1. [ SATISFIED ] - THERE IS INCONSISTENCY BETWEEN
 THE SITE PLAN AND THE CIVIL PLANS AS TO THE LOCATION OF
 CURBING, SPECIFICALLY ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE
 NORTHEASTERN ROW OF THE STARBUCKS? PARKING.
  
 22. [ SATISFIED ] - PLEASE EXPLAIN THE LOGIC BEHIND THE
 AREAS IDENTIFIED FOR PAVERS VERSUS THOSE AREAS WHERE
 ASPHALT IS BEING USED.
  
 23. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL
 BE PROTECTED FROM VEHICULAR ENCROACHMENT THROUGH THE
 USE OF CURBING.
  
 23.1. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - IT IS UNCLEAR OF THE
 PROPOSED GRADES/CURBING THAT ARE BEING SHOWN TO THE
 EAST OF STARBUCKS WHERE THE WALKWAY CONNECTS TO THE
 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY SIDEWALK. IS THE WALKWAY AT THE
 SAME GRADE AS THE ADJACENT LANDSCAPING, OR IS IT AT THE
 SAME GRADE OF THE PARKING LOT?
  
 23.1.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE
 WALKWAY FROM SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY TO THE BUILDING
 ENTRANCE BEING AT THE SAME GRADE AS THE ADJACENT
 PARKING, WITHOUT USE OF A PROTECTIVE BARRIER. AS
 DESIGNED, THERE IS NOTHING PROHIBITING THE VEHICLE FROM
 PARKING ON TOP OF THE WALKWAY, BLOCKING THE ACCESSIBLE
 ROUTE TO THE BUILDING AND VIOLATING ADA ACCESSIBILITY.
  
 24. [ SATISFIED ] - THE CIVIL PLANS SHOW THE PROPOSED
 BIKE RACKS IN WHAT APPEARS TO BE A LANDSCAPE AREA, BUT
 THIS IS SHOWN AS PAVERS ON OTHER PLANS. THE RACKS NEED
 TO BE INSTALLED ON A SOLID SURFACE (PAVERS, CONCRETE,
 ETC.) AS SHOWN IN THE DETAIL AND ALL PLANS NEED TO BE
 CONSISTENT.
  
 25. [ SATISFIED ] - THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE EAST
 PROPERTY LINE OF THE DRIVE-THRU IS UNCLEAR. IS THE AREA
 BETWEEN THE TREES SOD?
  
 26. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - STAFF WILL PROVIDE A
 SEPARATE SET OF REVIEW COMMENTS FOR THE PROPOSED SIGN
 PROGRAM.
  
 27. [ SATISFIED ] - PLEASE CLARIFY WHY THE NOTE
 REGARDING COMMITTED AND NON-USABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR
 BUILDING #1 IS STILL BEING SHOWN ON THE MAJOR
 AMENDMENT?
  
 28. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - WHY IS LANDSCAPING BEING SHOWN
 IN THE LOCATION OF THE BIKE RACKS AT THE SOUTHEAST
 CORNER OF BUILDING #1? THERE IS CONFLICT.
  
 29. [ SATISFIED ] - THE DUMPSTER CONFIGURATION TO THE
 NORTHWEST OF BUILDING #1 SHOULD MATCH BETWEEN THE MINOR
 AMENDMENT AND THE MAJOR AMENDMENT.
  
 30. [ SATISFIED BY CONDITION OF APPROVAL ] - JUST A
 REMINDER THAT THERE WILL BE CONDITION(S) OF APPROVAL
 REGARDING THE PERCENTAGE OF LANDSCAPE AREA. AS
 DISCUSSED PREVIOUSLY:
 - THE AFFECTED AREAS NEED TO MEET THE MINIMUM
 PERCENTAGE OF LANDSCAPING REQUIRED (15%); AND
  
 - THE OVERALL SITE SHOULD SHOW A DECREASE IN THE
 NON-CONFORMITY (MEANING AN INCREASE IN THE PERCENTAGE
 OF LANDSCAPING FROM WHAT CURRENTLY EXISTS); AND
  
 - THE REMAINING LANDSCAPING TO BRING THE ENTIRE SITE
 INTO CONFORMITY WILL BE PROVIDED UPON REDEVELOPMENT OF
 THE PARKING LOT WEST OF THE RAILROAD TRACKS.
  
 31. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - PLEASE EXPLAIN THE NEED FOR THE
 SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF BOLLARD AROUND THE PROPOSED
 BUILDING #2 (STARBUCKS). IN THOSE AREAS WHERE THERE IS
 CURBING (I.E. ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE DRIVE-THRU, IN
 THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS, ETC.) BOLLARDS SEEM UNNECESSARY.
  
 31.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] ? SUPPORTS FOR THE OVERHANG ARE
 UNDERSTOOD, BUT SHOULD BE MINIMIZED TO LIMIT THE AMOUNT
 OF VERTICAL ?INTERRUPTION? IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING
 FA?ADE. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE EXCESSIVE USE OF THE
 BOLLARDS AS THIS PRESENTS AN APPEARANCE OF
 FORTIFICATION AND NOT ATTRACTIVE URBAN DESIGN. IF THE
 APPLICANT IS INSISTING THAT THE BOLLARDS ARE TO REMAIN,
 STAFF WILL BE RECOMMENDING A CONDITION OF APPROVAL THAT
 THEY BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE PLAN.
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X
 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE FEBRUARY 18, 2020,
 PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE
 SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED
 DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN MONDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 2020.
  
 G) TO BE PLACED ON THE FEBRUARY 18, 2020, PLANNING
 BOARD AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO
 LATER THAN FEBRUARY 3, 2020. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM, AND
 BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
 CITY?S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; SUCH
 REQUIREMENTS ARE ALSO PROVIDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE
 PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED ABOVE.
  
 H) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT
 DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE
 COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-13-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 01-13-2020 Time 12:29 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 01-13-2020 Time 12:29 Sent To  
Notes
2020-01-13 12:30:26PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 01.13.2020
 PROJECT NO.: Z19090006
 CASE NO.: PB 1086C
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. [ SATISFIED ] - WITH ALL OF THE ADDITIONAL DETAIL,
 NOTES, LABELS, ETC. THE SITE PLAN NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED
 AT A LARGER SCALE. PROVIDE AN OVERALL SITE PLAN, BUT
 THEN DO ENLARGED SHEETS WITH MATCHLINES.
  
 2. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - STAFF WOULD LIKE TO
 CONTINUE TO LOOK INTO ALTERNATIVE SITE PLAN DESIGNS
 THAT PRESENT A MORE URBAN FEEL WITH BUILDING PRESENCE
 ON THE STREET, PARKING BEHIND, PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCES
 DIRECTLY FROM THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK INTO THE BUILDING,
 RELOCATION OF THE DUMPSTER AWAY FROM THE MAIN
 THOROUGHFARE, ETC.
  
 2.1. [ NEW COMMENT ] ? PLEASE NOTE THAT STAFF WILL
 LIKELY DISCUSS THE ALTERNATIVE DESIGN, ETC. AS PART OF
 THE FUTURE STAFF REPORT.
  
 3. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - AN APPROVAL TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY
 LETTER SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY.
  
 4. [ SATISFIED ] - THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT NEEDS TO
 BE CLEARER ABOUT THE SCOPE OF THE MAJOR AMENDMENT. FOR
 EXAMPLE, IN THE SECTION UNDER ?SITE DESIGN? IT IS
 DESCRIBING IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE A PART OF THE MINOR
 AMENDMENT, BUT THE DESCRIPTION MAKES IT SOUND LIKE THEY
 ARE PROPOSED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION.
  
 5. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - REPLAT OF THE PROPERTY WILL BE
 REQUIRED.
  
 5.1. [ NEW COMMENT ] ? REPLAT OF THE PROPERTY WILL BE A
 CONDITION OF APPROVAL.
  
 6. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - UNITY OF CONTROL WILL BE
 REQUIRED.
  
 6.1. [ NEW COMMENT ] ? UNITY OF CONTROL WILL BE A
 CONDITION OF APPROVAL.
  
 7. [ SATISFIED ] - ALL PLANS NEED TO REFLECT THE SCOPE
 OF WORK NECESSARY TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED TRUCK
 ROUTE.
  
 8. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - UPDATED FDOT LETTER SHALL BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 9. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THE UTILITY
 LETTERS PROVIDED REFLECT THEIR REVIEW OF THE SCOPE OF
 THE MAJOR AMENDMENT; IT APPEARS THAT SOME OF THE
 LETTERS ARE DATED THE SAME AS THOSE THAT WERE PROVIDED
 AS PART OF THE MINOR AMENDMENT APPLICATION.
  
 9.1. [ NEW COMMENT ] ? RESPONSES TO YOUR AUGUST 21,
 2019, REQUESTS SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM EACH OF THE
 UTILITY COMPANIES.
  
 10. [ SATISFIED ] - AT THE NEW DRIVE-THRU RESTAURANT,
 PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THERE ARE GATES ACROSS THE
 PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS. THE GATES SHALL BE REMOVED AND
 THERE SHALL BE CLEAR PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN
 THE PUBLIC WALKWAY AND THE BUSINESS.
  
 11. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS
 RESULTING FROM COMMENTS/REVIEW OF THE MINOR AMENDMENT
 SHALL BE REFLECTED ON THE PLANS FOR THE MAJOR
 AMENDMENT.
  
 12. [ NEW COMMENT ] ? AS ADDITIONAL COMMENTS HAVE BEEN
 PROVIDED FOR THE MINOR AMENDMENT, ANY MODIFICATIONS TO
 THE PLAN RESULTING FROM SUCH WILL NEED TO BE
 INCORPORATED INTO THE MAJOR AMENDMENT PLANS.
  
 13. [ SATISFIED ] - THE USES AND SQUARE FOOTAGES IN THE
 TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT DO NOT MATCH THAT WHICH IS
 SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN.
  
 14. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - SIZE, LOCATION, AND
 ORIENTATION OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE NEEDS TO BE
 APPROVED BY THE CITY?S PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.
  
 14.1. [ NEW COMMENT ] ? THE TURNING MOVEMENTS SHOWN ON
 THE SITE PLAN AND IN THE EXHIBIT ONLY SHOW THE TRUCK
 MOVEMENTS ENTERING TO PICK UP THE DUMPSTER; NO
 MOVEMENTS ARE SHOWN ON HOW THE TRUCK IS EXITING THE
 SITE. THIS COMMENT IS APPLICABLE TO THE DUMPSTER
 NORTHWEST OF BUILDING 2, AS WELL AS NORTHWEST OF
 BUILDING 1.
  
 15. [ SATISFIED ] - PLEASE EXPLAIN THE NEED FOR A
 BYPASS LANE ALONG THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE DRIVE-THRU.
  
 16. [ SATISFIED ] - SETBACKS LISTED AS ?REQUIRED? IN
 THE SITE DATA TABLE APPEAR TO BE INCORRECT.
  
 17. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - THE SITE PLAN FOR THE
 DRIVE-THRU SHOWS PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS COMING OFF OF
 BELVEDERE ROAD AND SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY WITH NO CLEAR
 PASSAGE TO THE BUILDING. THE CONNECTIONS ARE SHOWN
 DEAD-ENDING INTO PARKING SPACES, RANDOM CROSSINGS AT
 THE DRIVE-THRU, ETC.
  
 17.1. [ NEW COMMENT ] ? APPROPRIATE PAVEMENT MARKINGS
 SHOULD BE PROVIDED WHERE PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC CROSSES THE
 DRIVE-THRU AND DRIVE AISLES.
  
 18. [ NEW COMMENT ] - DIMENSIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED OF
 THE PARKING AND DRIVE AISLES AT THE DRIVE-THRU
 RESTAURANT.
  
 19. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - THE CIVIL PLANS SHOW THE
 PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS ON BELVEDERE ROAD AS ASPHALT.
 PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS SHOULD BE CLEARLY DELINEATED WITH
 DIFFERENT MATERIALS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, ETC. SO THAT
 THERE IS A CLEAR AND SAFE ROUTE BETWEEN THE PUBLIC
 WALKWAY AND THE BUILDING. AS DESIGNED, THEY LOOK LIKE
 DRIVEWAY APPROACHES.
  
 19.1. [ NEW COMMENT ] ? SEE COMMENT 16.1 ABOVE.
  
 20. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT
 WHEN PARKING ROWS ABUT A LANDSCAPE BUFFER, THAT WHEEL
 STOPS NOT BE USED AND THAT THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER BE
 WIDENED TO ACCOMMODATE THE VEHICLE OVERHANG.
  
 20.1. [ NEW COMMENT ] ? NOTE THAT IMPLEMENTING THE
 COMMENT ABOVE WOULD NOT HAVE REDUCED THE OVERALL LENGTH
 OF THE SPACE, IT WOULD HAVE SIMPLY ALLOWED THE VEHICLE
 TO OVERHANG LANDSCAPE AREA AS OPPOSED TO ADDITIONAL
 ASPHALT/PAVERS. AS CURRENTLY DESIGNED, ALL SPACES WILL
 BE REQUIRED TO HAVE WHEEL STOPS.
  
 21. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - THE CIVIL PLANS DO NOT
 APPEAR TO CORRECTLY DEPICT WHAT IS PROPOSED TO BE
 PAVERS, CONCRETE, LANDSCAPE, ETC.
  
 21.1. [ NEW COMMENT ] ? THERE IS INCONSISTENCY BETWEEN
 THE SITE PLAN AND THE CIVIL PLANS AS TO THE LOCATION OF
 CURBING, SPECIFICALLY ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE
 NORTHEASTERN ROW OF THE STARBUCK?S PARKING.
  
 22. [ SATISFIED ] - PLEASE EXPLAIN THE LOGIC BEHIND THE
 AREAS IDENTIFIED FOR PAVERS VERSUS THOSE AREAS WHERE
 ASPHALT IS BEING USED.
  
 23. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL
 BE PROTECTED FROM VEHICULAR ENCROACHMENT THROUGH THE
 USE OF CURBING.
  
 23.1. [ NEW COMMENT ] ? IT IS UNCLEAR OF THE PROPOSED
 GRADES/CURBING THAT ARE BEING SHOWN TO THE EAST OF
 STARBUCKS WHERE THE WALKWAY CONNECTS TO THE SOUTH DIXIE
 HIGHWAY SIDEWALK. IS THE WALKWAY AT THE SAME GRADE AS
 THE ADJACENT LANDSCAPING, OR IS IT AT THE SAME GRADE OF
 THE PARKING LOT?
  
 24. [ SATISFIED ] - THE CIVIL PLANS SHOW THE PROPOSED
 BIKE RACKS IN WHAT APPEARS TO BE A LANDSCAPE AREA, BUT
 THIS IS SHOWN AS PAVERS ON OTHER PLANS. THE RACKS NEED
 TO BE INSTALLED ON A SOLID SURFACE (PAVERS, CONCRETE,
 ETC.) AS SHOWN IN THE DETAIL AND ALL PLANS NEED TO BE
 CONSISTENT.
  
 25. [ SATISFIED ] - THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE EAST
 PROPERTY LINE OF THE DRIVE-THRU IS UNCLEAR. IS THE AREA
 BETWEEN THE TREES SOD?
  
 26. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - STAFF WILL PROVIDE A
 SEPARATE SET OF REVIEW COMMENTS FOR THE PROPOSED SIGN
 PROGRAM.
  
 27. [ NEW COMMENT ] ? PLEASE CLARIFY WHY THE NOTE
 REGARDING COMMITTED AND NON-USABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR
 BUILDING #1 IS STILL BEING SHOWN ON THE MAJOR
 AMENDMENT?
  
 28. [ NEW COMMENT ] ? WHY IS LANDSCAPING BEING SHOWN IN
 THE LOCATION OF THE BIKE RACKS AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER
 OF BUILDING #1? THERE IS CONFLICT.
  
 29. [ NEW COMMENT ] ? THE DUMPSTER CONFIGURATION TO THE
 NORTHWEST OF BUILDING #1 SHOULD MATCH BETWEEN THE MINOR
 AMENDMENT AND THE MAJOR AMENDMENT.
  
 30. [ NEW COMMENT ] - JUST A REMINDER THAT THERE WILL
 BE CONDITION(S) OF APPROVAL REGARDING THE PERCENTAGE OF
 LANDSCAPE AREA. AS DISCUSSED PREVIOUSLY:
 - THE AFFECTED AREAS NEED TO MEET THE MINIMUM
 PERCENTAGE OF LANDSCAPING REQUIRED (15%); AND
  
 - THE OVERALL SITE SHOULD SHOW A DECREASE IN THE
 NON-CONFORMITY (MEANING AN INCREASE IN THE PERCENTAGE
 OF LANDSCAPING FROM WHAT CURRENTLY EXISTS); AND
  
 - THE REMAINING LANDSCAPING TO BRING THE ENTIRE SITE
 INTO CONFORMITY WILL BE PROVIDED UPON REDEVELOPMENT OF
 THE PARKING LOT WEST OF THE RAILROAD TRACKS.
  
 31. [ NEW COMMENT ] ? PLEASE EXPLAIN THE NEED FOR THE
 SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF BOLLARD AROUND THE PROPOSED
 BUILDING #2 (STARBUCK?S). IN THOSE AREAS WHERE THERE IS
 CURBING (I.E. ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE DRIVE-THRU, IN
 THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS, ETC.) BOLLARDS SEEM UNNECESSARY.
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X
 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE FEBRUARY 18, 2020,
 PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE
 SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED
 DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN TUESDAY, JANUARY 21,
 2020.
  
 G) TO BE PLACED ON THE FEBRUARY 18, 2020, PLANNING
 BOARD AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO
 LATER THAN FEBRUARY 3, 2020. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM, AND
 BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
 CITY?S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; SUCH
 REQUIREMENTS ARE ALSO PROVIDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE
 PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED ABOVE.
  
 H) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT
 DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE
 COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-10-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 10-10-2019 Time 12:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 10-10-2019 Time 12:34 Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-10 12:36:32PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 10.10.2019
 PROJECT NO.: Z19090006
 CASE NO.: PB 1086C
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. WITH ALL OF THE ADDITIONAL DETAIL, NOTES, LABELS,
 ETC. THE SITE PLAN NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED AT A LARGER
 SCALE. PROVIDE AN OVERALL SITE PLAN, BUT THEN DO
 ENLARGED SHEETS WITH MATCHLINES.
  
 2. STAFF WOULD LIKE TO CONTINUE TO LOOK INTO
 ALTERNATIVE SITE PLAN DESIGNS THAT PRESENT A MORE URBAN
 FEEL WITH BUILDING PRESENCE ON THE STREET, PARKING
 BEHIND, PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCES DIRECTLY FROM THE PUBLIC
 SIDEWALK INTO THE BUILDING, RELOCATION OF THE DUMPSTER
 AWAY FROM THE MAIN THOROUGHFARE, ETC.
  
 3. AN APPROVAL TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY LETTER SHALL BE
 PROVIDED FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY.
  
 4. THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT NEEDS TO BE CLEARER
 ABOUT THE SCOPE OF THE MAJOR AMENDMENT. FOR EXAMPLE, IN
 THE SECTION UNDER ?SITE DESIGN? IT IS DESCRIBING
 IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE A PART OF THE MINOR AMENDMENT,
 BUT THE DESCRIPTION MAKES IT SOUND LIKE THEY ARE
 PROPOSED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION.
  
 5. REPLAT OF THE PROPERTY WILL BE REQUIRED.
  
 6. UNITY OF CONTROL WILL BE REQUIRED.
  
 7. ALL PLANS NEED TO REFLECT THE SCOPE OF WORK
 NECESSARY TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED TRUCK ROUTE.
  
 8. UPDATED FDOT LETTER SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 9. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THE UTILITY LETTERS PROVIDED
 REFLECT THEIR REVIEW OF THE SCOPE OF THE MAJOR
 AMENDMENT; IT APPEARS THAT SOME OF THE LETTERS ARE
 DATED THE SAME AS THOSE THAT WERE PROVIDED AS PART OF
 THE MINOR AMENDMENT APPLICATION.
  
 10. AT THE NEW DRIVE-THRU RESTAURANT, PLEASE EXPLAIN
 WHY THERE ARE GATES ACROSS THE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS.
 THE GATES SHALL BE REMOVED AND THERE SHALL BE CLEAR
 PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN THE PUBLIC WALKWAY AND
 THE BUSINESS.
  
 11. IMPORTANT ? ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS RESULTING FROM
 COMMENTS/REVIEW OF THE MINOR AMENDMENT SHALL BE
 REFLECTED ON THE PLANS FOR THE MAJOR AMENDMENT.
  
 12. THE USES AND SQUARE FOOTAGES IN THE TRAFFIC IMPACT
 STATEMENT DO NOT MATCH THAT WHICH IS SHOWN ON THE SITE
 PLAN.
  
 13. SIZE, LOCATION, AND ORIENTATION OF THE DUMPSTER
 ENCLOSURE NEEDS TO BE APPROVED BY THE CITY?S PUBLIC
 WORKS DEPARTMENT.
  
 14. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE NEED FOR A BYPASS LANE ALONG THE
 ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE DRIVE-THRU.
  
 15. SETBACKS LISTED AS ?REQUIRED? IN THE SITE DATA
 TABLE APPEAR TO BE INCORRECT.
  
 16. THE SITE PLAN FOR THE DRIVE-THRU SHOWS PEDESTRIAN
 CONNECTIONS COMING OFF OF BELVEDERE ROAD AND SOUTH
 DIXIE HIGHWAY WITH NO CLEAR PASSAGE TO THE BUILDING.
 THE CONNECTIONS ARE SHOWN DEAD-ENDING INTO PARKING
 SPACES, RANDOM CROSSINGS AT THE DRIVE-THRU, ETC.
  
 17. DIMENSIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED OF THE PARKING AND
 DRIVE AISLES AT THE DRIVE-THRU RESTAURANT.
  
 18. THE CIVIL PLANS SHOW THE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS ON
 BELVEDERE ROAD AS ASPHALT. PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS SHOULD
 BE CLEARLY DELINEATED WITH DIFFERENT MATERIALS,
 PAVEMENT MARKINGS, ETC. SO THAT THERE IS A CLEAR AND
 SAFE ROUTE BETWEEN THE PUBLIC WALKWAY AND THE BUILDING.
 AS DESIGNED, THEY LOOK LIKE DRIVEWAY APPROACHES.
  
 19. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT WHEN PARKING ROWS ABUT A
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER, THAT WHEEL STOPS NOT BE USED AND THAT
 THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER BE WIDENED TO ACCOMMODATE THE
 VEHICLE OVERHANG.
  
 20. THE CIVIL PLANS DO NOT APPEAR TO CORRECTLY DEPICT
 WHAT IS PROPOSED TO BE PAVERS, CONCRETE, LANDSCAPE,
 ETC.
  
 21. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE LOGIC BEHIND THE AREAS
 IDENTIFIED FOR PAVERS VERSUS THOSE AREAS WHERE ASPHALT
 IS BEING USED.
  
 22. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM
 VEHICULAR ENCROACHMENT THROUGH THE USE OF CURBING.
  
 23. THE CIVIL PLANS SHOW THE PROPOSED BIKE RACKS IN
 WHAT APPEARS TO BE A LANDSCAPE AREA, BUT THIS IS SHOWN
 AS PAVERS ON OTHER PLANS. THE RACKS NEED TO BE
 INSTALLED ON A SOLID SURFACE (PAVERS, CONCRETE, ETC.)
 AS SHOWN IN THE DETAIL AND ALL PLANS NEED TO BE
 CONSISTENT.
  
 24. THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE
 OF THE DRIVE-THRU IS UNCLEAR. IS THE AREA BETWEEN THE
 TREES SOD?
  
 25. STAFF WILL PROVIDE A SEPARATE SET OF REVIEW
 COMMENTS FOR THE PROPOSED SIGN PROGRAM.
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X
 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE DECEMBER 17, 2019,
 PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE
 SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED
 DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, OCTOBER 26, 2019.
  
 G) TO BE PLACED ON THE DECEMBER 17, 2019, PLANNING
 BOARD AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO
 LATER THAN DECEMBER 2, 2019. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM, AND
 BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
 CITY?S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; SUCH
 REQUIREMENTS ARE ALSO PROVIDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE
 PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED ABOVE.
  
 H) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT
 DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE
 COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved