 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z19080025
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z19080025 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-10-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
09-10-2019 |
Time |
20:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
09-10-2019 |
Time |
20:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-09-10 20:49:21 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AN ASBESTOS | | | SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT | | | REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963, | | | OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 3. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR | | | THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, | | | AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 4. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND | | | OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF | | | OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE | | | VERIFIED. | | | | | | 5. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. IF THE COFFEE BAR SERVICES WILL | | | INCLUDE FOODS MADE ON THE PREMISES, A GREASE | | | INTERCEPTOR WILL BE REQUIRED. PLEASE CONTACT JEFFREY | | | ODOMS, UTILITIES O&M SUPERINTENDENT, PUBLIC UTILITIES | | | DEPARTMENT, FATS OILS AND GREASE DIVISION, AT (561) | | | 822-2172, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 6. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, | | | FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, | | | GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, | | | SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 7. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND | | | CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF | | | CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. | | | | | | 8. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER | | | AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY, | | | INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE | | | CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION | | | THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY. | | | | | | 9. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT | | | WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL | | | HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT | | | MICHAEL ORIO, GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 | | | 1080, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 10. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT | | | TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE | | | ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP | | | ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC | | | PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-27-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
02-27-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
02-27-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-27 11:56:24 | PASSED WITH PROVISOS: | | | | | | 1. FOR ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE UPDATE ALL | | | STANDARD DETAILS AND REFERENCE NOTES TO MOST CURRENT | | | VERSION (GC-4 NOT P-4) ETC. | | | 2. FOR ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ADD WATER & SEWER | | | DEMANDS TO SHEET WS-1. | | | 3. FOR ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ADD NOTE TO REMOVE | | | WATER SERVICE BEING CAPPED IN ALLEY IF LARGER THAN 2 | | | INCHES. | | | 4. FOR ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS ON | | | PROPOSED VALVES, TAPS, ETC. (MATERIAL, SIZE, ETC.) | | | 5. FOR ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE REVISE PROPOSED | | | SANITARY TAPS PER MARKUP EMAILED TO CONSULTANT ON FEB. | | | 27, 2020. | | | | | | PLEASE COORDINATE WITH PUBLIC WORKS SANITATION | | | DEPARTMENT FOR APPROVAL OF DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. CONTACT | | | MR. MATT HEJAZI AT 561-822-2075, OR [email protected], | | | AND FORWARD APPROVAL TO PLANNER IN CHARGE OF PROJECT. | | | | | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | CONCERNS, THANKS. | | | | | | RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX | | | 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 FAX: | | | (561) 494-1116 MOBILE: (561) 246-9525 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING | | | | | | MANNY GONZALEZ, SENIOR ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX | | | 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 DIRECT: (561) 494-1085 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 MOBILE: (561) 644-7301 EMAIL: | | | [email protected] WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-06-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
09-06-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
09-06-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-09-06 10:16:33 | 1. PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY | | | OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC | | | RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF | | | YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE | | | MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL | | | IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT | | | [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER | | | ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION | | | ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD | | | SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC. | | | 2. AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR | | | MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI | | | CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL | | | 3. PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS | | | OF ALL WATER, STORM WATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER | | | LINES, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER | | | AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, | | | METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE | | | SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING | | | GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, | | | ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL | | | INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER | | | LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE | | | PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN | | | VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. | | | ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND | | | PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER | | | OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & | | | TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL | | | UTILITY CROSSINGS. CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE, | | | AND REMOVE ANY ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 | | | INCHES FROM CITY RIGHT OF WAY. | | | 4. PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE | | | DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB | | | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION). | | | 5. SHOW DIMENSIONS OF PROPOSED DUMPSTER PER CURRENT | | | CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8. | | | 6. CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY | | | SEWER ARE REQUIRED. | | | 7. PLEASE CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA | | | AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA. | | | 8. PROVIDE VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER ALONG | | | ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE. | | | 9. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED | | | DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM & PEAK) AND | | | FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 | | | FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER. | | | 10. PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION | | | INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929). | | | 11. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS. | | | 12. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION OF WATER | | | METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION. | | | 13. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES | | | OF WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS. | | | 14. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING | | | APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT | | | SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING | | | SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED | | | LEAD-FREE DESIGN. | | | 15. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL CLEARLY SHOW ROAD | | | RIGHT OF WAY. | | | 16. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ON SHEET PP1 | | | PROVIDE INLET PROTECTION AT CATCH BASIN ON NW CORNER. | | | 17. ADD CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD DETAIL PC-2 | | | AND PC-3 TO SHEET PP2. | | | 18. UPDATE ALL REFERENCES TO CITY OF WPB STANDARD | | | DETAILS TO MOST CURRENT VERSIONS WHICH CAN BE FOUND | | | HERE: HTTPS://WWW.WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLI | | | C-WORKS/ENGINEERING-STANDARDS-DETAILS | | | 19. PROVIDE ALL RELEVANT CURRENT CITY OF WPB STANDARD | | | DETAILS ? PAVEMENT RESTORATION, PAVING, DUMPSTER | | | ENCLOSURE, WATER, SEWER ETC. | | | 20. PLEASE SHOW PROPOSED AND EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTS. | | | 21. PLEASE REMOVE PROPOSED WATER CONNECTION IN ALLEY; 4 | | | IN. LINE IS NOT ADEQUATE FOR SERVICE. | | | 22. PLEASE REALIGN PROPOSED WATER SERVICE CONNECTION | | | FROM BROADWAY IN A NORTH/SOUTH ORIENTATION (NOT | | | DIAGONALLY). ADJUST METER AND BACKFLOW PLACEMENT | | | ACCORDINGLY. | | | 23. PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-04-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
09-04-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
09-04-2019 |
Time |
14:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-09-04 14:45:00 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE | | | OCCUPANCY TYPE, PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE. | | | | | | 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE | | | LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER | | | SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED | | | ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION. AN EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT WAS NOT | | | IDENTIFIABLE ON THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN. | | | | | | AS A PROPOSED NEW APARTMENT BUILDING AND THE REQUIRMENT | | | OF A FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM, ANY NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND | | | FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE WITHIN 100' | | | OF EACH OTHER AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU | | | OF FIRE PREVENTION. DUE TO THE DEAD-END CONFIGURATION | | | ALONG WITH ACCESS FROM BROADWAY, THE PROPOSED LOCATIONS | | | NEED TO READILY ACCESSIBLE FROM BOTH AREAS. | | | | | | PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON | | | THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW | | | FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES. | | | | | | 9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER | | | THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY | | | ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM, | | | ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FS 61G AND | | | SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PLAN. | | | | | | 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE | | | SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS BE PROVIDED | | | FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS TO APPLICABLE CRITICAL | | | AREAS, I.E, LOBBY AREAS, FACP ROOM, ELECTRICAL ROOMS, | | | LOCKED COMMON AREAS. | | | | | | 12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-29-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
06-29-2020 |
Time |
16:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
06-29-2020 |
Time |
16:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-06-29 16:11:25 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 3404 BROADWAY MIXED USE Z19080025 | | | JUNE 29, 2020 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. THE APPLICANT MAY DO A COMPREHENSIVE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE ENTIRE SITE AND PROVIDE A | | | PHASING PLAN OR PROVIDE TWO SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PLANS, | | | ONE FOR EACH PHASE. ALL PLANS MUST MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY AND DISPOSITION CHART OF THE | | | TREES WITHIN THE AFFECTED AREA AND INDICATE IF THEY | | | WILL BE PRESERVED IN PLACE, RELOCATED OR REMOVED. LIST | | | THE BOTANICAL NAME AND PROVIDE THE CANOPY DIAMETER. | | | CALCULATE THE REQUIRED MITIGATION IN SQUARE FOOTAGE. | | | ? SATISFIED. SHOW CALCULATIONS FOR CANOPY SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE BASED ON DIAMETER, 1:1 SAME CATEGORY IF UNDER | | | 20 FEET, ACTUAL AREA 20 FEET OR MORE WITHIN THE | | | DISPOSITION CHART. | | | SOLITAIRE PALMS ARE 50 SQ FT EACH, FICUS TREES ARE 717 | | | SQ FT EACH, ARECAS 50 SQ FT EACH, #12 SAPOTE (NOT BLACK | | | OLIVE) IS 314 SQ FT. IF THE 4 SABAL PALMS ARE IN GOOD | | | CONDITION, THEY MUST BE RELOCATED. | | | ? SATISFIED. ADD THE SUM OF ALL TREE CANOPY MITIGATION | | | TO SHOW THE TOTAL MITIGATION DUE. | | | TOTAL MITIGATION DUE WILL BE 2698 SQ FT WITH 4 SABALS | | | BEING RELOCATED. | | | ? SATISFIED. SHOW THE MITIGATION PROVIDED CALCULATION | | | FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED WITH THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN. | | | SHOW TOTALS FOR PHASE 1 AND 2 BASED ON MITIGATION | | | CREDITS BY CATEGORY. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE | | | DESIGN OPTIONS CHART SECTION 94-446 (G) AND PROVIDE THE | | | REQUIRED 50 POINTS. | | | MAKE ALL CORRECTIONS TO PLANT LIST FOR COMMENTS AND | | | RECALCULATE POINTS BASED ON PLANT LIST FOR BOTH PHASES. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING | | | LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION | | | 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS. | | | CALCULATE SQUARE FOOTAGE REQUIRED PER CODES REFERENCED | | | AND SHOW WHERE IT IS PROVIDED WITHIN THE PARKING AREA | | | FOR BOTH PHASES. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED BUFFER | | | TREES AT ONE FOR EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR | | | ALL BUFFER LENGTHS, AND SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED. | | | PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR EAST BUFFER ON PHASE 1. | | | PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR EAST AND NORTH BUFFER FOR | | | PHASE 2. | | | THIS COMMENT WAS FOR MISSING BUFFER INFORMATION ON THE | | | FIRST REVIEW. BUFFER CALCULATIONS ARE TO BE SUPPLIED | | | FOR 3 SIDES ON PHASE 1, AND 3 SIDES ON PHASE 2. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF REQUIRED 10 FOOT | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ON THE BROADWAY AND 33RD STREET SIDES | | | OF THE PROJECT PER SECTION 94-443(D). SHOW THE BUFFER | | | WIDTH PROVIDED ON THE EAST PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED BUFFER TREES WITHIN | | | THE PROPERTY LINE OF THE PROJECT. TREES MAY BE PLACED | | | ANYWHERE WITHIN THE AREA BETWEEN THE PROPERTY LINE AND | | | BUILDING. SHRUBS MAY BE PLACED BETWEEN THE CURB AND | | | SIDEWALK AS PART OF ROADWAY BEAUTIFICATION TO SEPARATE | | | THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AREAS FROM TRAFFIC. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE HEDGES TO SCREEN ALL PARKING | | | AREAS FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND STREETS. | | | | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. MULTIFAMILY REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION | | | 94-443(D) SHALL APPLY FOR THE ADDITIONAL TREES REQUIRED | | | AT ONE PER UNIT ADDED TO THE OVERALL SHADE TREE AND | | | FLOWERING TREE REQUIREMENT. SHOW TOTAL REQUIRED AND | | | PROVIDED. | | | CALCULATE THE TREE (1/1500), FLOWERING TREE (1 /6000) | | | AND SHRUB (1/500) COUNTS BASED ON THE OPEN SPACE SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE PROVIDED FOR EACH PHASE PER SECTION 94-442(C), | | | THEN ADD THE ADDITIONAL TREES PER UNIT FOR BOTH PHASES. | | | SHOW THE ADDITIONAL TREES PER UNIT. | | | | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. SHOW LINEAR FOOTAGE OF LANDSCAPED AREA | | | ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING MEETS THE REQUIREMENT OF 40 | | | PERCENT PER SECTION 94-443(D)(2) B. | | | PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR BUILDING PERIMETER, REQUIRED | | | AND PROVIDED LINEAR FEET OF LANDSCAPED AREA FOR | | | BUILDINGS IN BOTH PHASES. | | | | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. | | | PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT | | | MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | PROVIDE THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST. | | | PROVIDE THE PERCENTAGE AFTER ADJUSTMENTS FOR NATIVE | | | PLANTS ON PLANT LIST PER COMMENT 16. | | | MUST SHOW TOTAL PERCENTAGE FOR NATIVE AND DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL ADDED | | | PLANTS. | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH | | | LANDSCAPING. | | | THE REASON TO FIND OUT THE LOCATION IS TO AVOID | | | PLACEMENT OF THE TRANSFORMER IN LANDSCAPE ISLANDS THAT | | | WOULD DISPLACE THE TREE REQUIRED BY CODE. THIS NEEDS TO | | | BE CLEAR FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE | | | PLANS. | | | TRANSFORMER LOCATION IS SHOWN BUT WILL RESTRICT THE | | | PLANTING OF THE REQUIRED TREE. | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DETAIL AND LOCATIONS OF ROOT | | | BARRIERS TO SEPARATE LANDSCAPING FROM UTILITY LINES. | | | DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER LINES NEED TO BE SHOWN ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. THERE ARE MULTIPLE CONFLICTS BETWEEN | | | REQUIRED TREES AND UTILITIES. THERE NEEDS TO BE | | | COORDINATION BETWEEN THE ENGINEER AND LANDSCAPE | | | ARCHITECT TO CORRECT THESE CONFLICTS. | | | | | | | | | 14. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED | | | VALVES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | ALL UTILITY VALVES, FIRE LINES, A/C UNITS, ETC. NEED TO | | | BE SHOWN AND SCREENING HEDGES PROVIDED. | | | | | | | | | 15. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING | | | ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH | | | TREES. | | | LIGHTING LOCATIONS ARE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO | | | AVOID CONFLICTS WITH REQUIRED TREES, BUT SITE PLAN AND | | | ENGINEERING PLANS SHOW THE LIGHT POLES IN LANDSCAPE | | | ISLANDS IN CONFLICT WITH REQUIRED TREES. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 3/3/20: | | | 16. SATISFIED. SHORE JUNIPER AND VIBURNUM SUSPENSUM ARE | | | NOT FLORIDA NATIVE PLANTS. THEY ARE NATIVE TO JAPAN. | | | | | | 17. SATISFIED. PHASE 1 PLAN DOES NOT MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENT FOR 75% OF THE REQUIRED PARKING LOT TREES | | | TO BE CATEGORY 1 TREES SUCH AS LIVE OAK TO PROVIDE | | | SHADE FOR THE PARKING SPACES PER SECTION 94-443 (C)(3). | | | | | | 18. SATISFIED. PHASE 2 PLAN IS MISSING REQUIRED TREES | | | IN TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND DOES NOT MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENT FOR 75% OF THE REQUIRED PARKING LOT TREES | | | TO BE CATEGORY 1 TREES SUCH AS LIVE OAK TO PROVIDE | | | SHADE FOR THE PARKING SPACES. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 5/27/20: | | | 19. SATISFIED. ALL TERMINAL ISLANDS MUST BE PROVIDED AT | | | THE END OF EACH ROW OF PARKING AS REQUIRED, AND THE 8 | | | FOOT WIDTH INSIDE THE CURB MUST BE PROVIDED. IF THE | | | TERMINAL ISLAND IS ADJACENT TO A 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFER, THE ADDITIONAL 3 FEET MUST BE PROVIDED TO | | | ACHIEVE THE 8 FEET WIDTH. | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-27-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
05-27-2020 |
Time |
11:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
05-27-2020 |
Time |
11:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-05-27 11:49:46 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 3404 BROADWAY MIXED USE Z19080025 | | | MAY 27, 2020 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. THE APPLICANT MAY DO A COMPREHENSIVE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE ENTIRE SITE AND PROVIDE A | | | PHASING PLAN OR PROVIDE TWO SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PLANS, | | | ONE FOR EACH PHASE. ALL PLANS MUST MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY AND DISPOSITION CHART OF THE | | | TREES WITHIN THE AFFECTED AREA AND INDICATE IF THEY | | | WILL BE PRESERVED IN PLACE, RELOCATED OR REMOVED. LIST | | | THE BOTANICAL NAME AND PROVIDE THE CANOPY DIAMETER. | | | CALCULATE THE REQUIRED MITIGATION IN SQUARE FOOTAGE. | | | ? SATISFIED. SHOW CALCULATIONS FOR CANOPY SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE BASED ON DIAMETER, 1:1 SAME CATEGORY IF UNDER | | | 20 FEET, ACTUAL AREA 20 FEET OR MORE WITHIN THE | | | DISPOSITION CHART. | | | SOLITAIRE PALMS ARE 50 SQ FT EACH, FICUS TREES ARE 717 | | | SQ FT EACH, ARECAS 50 SQ FT EACH, #12 SAPOTE (NOT BLACK | | | OLIVE) IS 314 SQ FT. IF THE 4 SABAL PALMS ARE IN GOOD | | | CONDITION, THEY MUST BE RELOCATED. | | | ? SATISFIED. ADD THE SUM OF ALL TREE CANOPY MITIGATION | | | TO SHOW THE TOTAL MITIGATION DUE. | | | TOTAL MITIGATION DUE WILL BE 2698 SQ FT WITH 4 SABALS | | | BEING RELOCATED. | | | ? NOT SATISFIED. SHOW THE MITIGATION PROVIDED | | | CALCULATION FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED WITH THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | SHOW TOTALS FOR PHASE 1 AND 2 BASED ON MITIGATION | | | CREDITS BY CATEGORY. | | | | | | 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | LANDSCAPE DESIGN OPTIONS CHART SECTION 94-446 (G) AND | | | PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 50 POINTS. | | | MAKE ALL CORRECTIONS TO PLANT LIST FOR COMMENTS AND | | | RECALCULATE POINTS BASED ON PLANT LIST FOR BOTH PHASES. | | | | | | 4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE | | | PARKING LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH | | | SECTION 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS. | | | CALCULATE SQUARE FOOTAGE REQUIRED PER CODES REFERENCED | | | AND SHOW WHERE IT IS PROVIDED WITHIN THE PARKING AREA | | | FOR BOTH PHASES. | | | | | | 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR | | | REQUIRED BUFFER TREES AT ONE FOR EVERY 30 FEET OR | | | PORTION THEREOF FOR ALL BUFFER LENGTHS, AND SHOW THE | | | NUMBER PROVIDED. | | | PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR EAST BUFFER ON PHASE 1. | | | PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR EAST AND NORTH BUFFER FOR | | | PHASE 2. | | | THIS COMMENT WAS FOR MISSING BUFFER INFORMATION ON THE | | | FIRST REVIEW. BUFFER CALCULATIONS ARE TO BE SUPPLIED | | | FOR 3 SIDES ON PHASE 1, AND 3 SIDES ON PHASE 2. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF REQUIRED 10 FOOT | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ON THE BROADWAY AND 33RD STREET SIDES | | | OF THE PROJECT PER SECTION 94-443(D). SHOW THE BUFFER | | | WIDTH PROVIDED ON THE EAST PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED BUFFER TREES WITHIN | | | THE PROPERTY LINE OF THE PROJECT. TREES MAY BE PLACED | | | ANYWHERE WITHIN THE AREA BETWEEN THE PROPERTY LINE AND | | | BUILDING. SHRUBS MAY BE PLACED BETWEEN THE CURB AND | | | SIDEWALK AS PART OF ROADWAY BEAUTIFICATION TO SEPARATE | | | THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AREAS FROM TRAFFIC. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE HEDGES TO SCREEN ALL PARKING | | | AREAS FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND STREETS. | | | | | | | | | 9. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. MULTIFAMILY REQUIREMENTS OF | | | SECTION 94-443(D) SHALL APPLY FOR THE ADDITIONAL TREES | | | REQUIRED AT ONE PER UNIT ADDED TO THE OVERALL SHADE | | | TREE AND FLOWERING TREE REQUIREMENT. SHOW TOTAL | | | REQUIRED AND PROVIDED. | | | CALCULATE THE TREE (1/1500), FLOWERING TREE (1 /6000) | | | AND SHRUB (1/500) COUNTS BASED ON THE OPEN SPACE SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE PROVIDED FOR EACH PHASE PER SECTION 94-442(C), | | | THEN ADD THE ADDITIONAL TREES PER UNIT FOR BOTH PHASES. | | | SHOW THE ADDITIONAL TREES PER UNIT. | | | | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. SHOW LINEAR FOOTAGE OF LANDSCAPED AREA | | | ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING MEETS THE REQUIREMENT OF 40 | | | PERCENT PER SECTION 94-443(D)(2) B. | | | PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR BUILDING PERIMETER, REQUIRED | | | AND PROVIDED LINEAR FEET OF LANDSCAPED AREA FOR | | | BUILDINGS IN BOTH PHASES. | | | | | | | | | 11. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION | | | 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF | | | PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | PROVIDE THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST. | | | PROVIDE THE PERCENTAGE AFTER ADJUSTMENTS FOR NATIVE | | | PLANTS ON PLANT LIST PER COMMENT 16. | | | MUST SHOW TOTAL PERCENTAGE FOR NATIVE AND DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL ADDED | | | PLANTS. | | | | | | | | | | | | 12. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL | | | TRANSFORMERS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE | | | CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | THE REASON TO FIND OUT THE LOCATION IS TO AVOID | | | PLACEMENT OF THE TRANSFORMER IN LANDSCAPE ISLANDS THAT | | | WOULD DISPLACE THE TREE REQUIRED BY CODE. THIS NEEDS TO | | | BE CLEAR FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE | | | PLANS. | | | TRANSFORMER LOCATION IS SHOWN BUT WILL RESTRICT THE | | | PLANTING OF THE REQUIRED TREE. | | | | | | 13. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DETAIL AND LOCATIONS | | | OF ROOT BARRIERS TO SEPARATE LANDSCAPING FROM UTILITY | | | LINES. | | | DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER LINES NEED TO BE SHOWN ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. THERE ARE MULTIPLE CONFLICTS BETWEEN | | | REQUIRED TREES AND UTILITIES. THERE NEEDS TO BE | | | COORDINATION BETWEEN THE ENGINEER AND LANDSCAPE | | | ARCHITECT TO CORRECT THESE CONFLICTS. | | | | | | | | | 14. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND | | | MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | ALL UTILITY VALVES, FIRE LINES, A/C UNITS, ETC. NEED TO | | | BE SHOWN AND SCREENING HEDGES PROVIDED. | | | | | | | | | 15. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE | | | LIGHTING ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY | | | CONFLICTS WITH TREES. | | | LIGHTING LOCATIONS ARE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO | | | AVOID CONFLICTS WITH REQUIRED TREES, BUT SITE PLAN AND | | | ENGINEERING PLANS SHOW THE LIGHT POLES IN LANDSCAPE | | | ISLANDS IN CONFLICT WITH REQUIRED TREES. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 3/3/20: | | | 16. SATISFIED. SHORE JUNIPER AND VIBURNUM SUSPENSUM ARE | | | NOT FLORIDA NATIVE PLANTS. THEY ARE NATIVE TO JAPAN. | | | | | | 17. NOT SATISFIED. PHASE 1 PLAN DOES NOT MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENT FOR 75% OF THE REQUIRED PARKING LOT TREES | | | TO BE CATEGORY 1 TREES SUCH AS LIVE OAK TO PROVIDE | | | SHADE FOR THE PARKING SPACES PER SECTION 94-443 (C)(3). | | | | | | 18. NOT SATISFIED. PHASE 2 PLAN IS MISSING REQUIRED | | | TREES IN TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND DOES NOT MEET | | | THE REQUIREMENT FOR 75% OF THE REQUIRED PARKING LOT | | | TREES TO BE CATEGORY 1 TREES SUCH AS LIVE OAK TO | | | PROVIDE SHADE FOR THE PARKING SPACES. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 5/27/20: | | | 19. ALL TERMINAL ISLANDS MUST BE PROVIDED AT THE END OF | | | EACH ROW OF PARKING AS REQUIRED, AND THE 8 FOOT WIDTH | | | INSIDE THE CURB MUST BE PROVIDED. IF THE TERMINAL | | | ISLAND IS ADJACENT TO A 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER, THE | | | ADDITIONAL 3 FEET MUST BE PROVIDED TO ACHIEVE THE 8 | | | FEET WIDTH. | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-03-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-03-2020 |
Time |
15:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
03-03-2020 |
Time |
15:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-03-03 15:34:52 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 3404 BROADWAY MIXED USE Z19080025 | | | MARCH 3, 2020 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. THE APPLICANT MAY DO A COMPREHENSIVE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE ENTIRE SITE AND PROVIDE A | | | PHASING PLAN OR PROVIDE TWO SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PLANS, | | | ONE FOR EACH PHASE. ALL PLANS MUST MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY AND DISPOSITION CHART OF THE | | | TREES WITHIN THE AFFECTED AREA AND INDICATE IF THEY | | | WILL BE PRESERVED IN PLACE, RELOCATED OR REMOVED. LIST | | | THE BOTANICAL NAME AND PROVIDE THE CANOPY DIAMETER. | | | CALCULATE THE REQUIRED MITIGATION IN SQUARE FOOTAGE. | | | ? NOT SATISFIED. SHOW CALCULATIONS FOR CANOPY SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE BASED ON DIAMETER, 1:1 SAME CATEGORY IF UNDER | | | 20 FEET, ACTUAL AREA 20 FEET OR MORE WITHIN THE | | | DISPOSITION CHART. | | | SOLITAIRE PALMS ARE 50 SQ FT EACH, FICUS TREES ARE 717 | | | SQ FT EACH, ARECAS 50 SQ FT EACH, #12 SAPOTE (NOT BLACK | | | OLIVE) IS 314 SQ FT. IF THE 4 SABAL PALMS ARE IN GOOD | | | CONDITION, THEY MUST BE RELOCATED. | | | ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ADD THE SUM OF ALL TREE CANOPY | | | MITIGATION TO SHOW THE TOTAL MITIGATION DUE. | | | TOTAL MITIGATION DUE WILL BE 2698 SQ FT WITH 4 SABALS | | | BEING RELOCATED. | | | ? NOT SATISFIED. SHOW THE MITIGATION PROVIDED | | | CALCULATION FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED WITH THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | SHOW TOTALS FOR PHASE 1 AND 2 BASED ON MITIGATION | | | CREDITS BY CATEGORY. | | | | | | 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | LANDSCAPE DESIGN OPTIONS CHART SECTION 94-446 (G) AND | | | PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 50 POINTS. | | | MAKE ALL CORRECTIONS TO PLANT LIST FOR COMMENTS AND | | | RECALCULATE POINTS BASED ON PLANT LIST FOR BOTH PHASES. | | | | | | 4. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING | | | LANDSCAPE AREAS COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION | | | 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS. | | | CALCULATE SQUARE FOOTAGE REQUIRED PER CODES REFERENCED | | | AND SHOW WHERE IT IS PROVIDED WITHIN THE PARKING AREA | | | FOR BOTH PHASES. | | | | | | 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR | | | REQUIRED BUFFER TREES AT ONE FOR EVERY 30 FEET OR | | | PORTION THEREOF FOR ALL BUFFER LENGTHS, AND SHOW THE | | | NUMBER PROVIDED. | | | PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR EAST BUFFER ON PHASE 1. | | | PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR EAST AND NORTH BUFFER FOR | | | PHASE 2. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF REQUIRED 10 FOOT | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ON THE BROADWAY AND 33RD STREET SIDES | | | OF THE PROJECT PER SECTION 94-443(D). SHOW THE BUFFER | | | WIDTH PROVIDED ON THE EAST PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED BUFFER TREES WITHIN | | | THE PROPERTY LINE OF THE PROJECT. TREES MAY BE PLACED | | | ANYWHERE WITHIN THE AREA BETWEEN THE PROPERTY LINE AND | | | BUILDING. SHRUBS MAY BE PLACED BETWEEN THE CURB AND | | | SIDEWALK AS PART OF ROADWAY BEAUTIFICATION TO SEPARATE | | | THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AREAS FROM TRAFFIC. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE HEDGES TO SCREEN ALL PARKING | | | AREAS FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND STREETS. | | | | | | | | | 9. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. MULTIFAMILY REQUIREMENTS OF | | | SECTION 94-443(D) SHALL APPLY FOR THE ADDITIONAL TREES | | | REQUIRED AT ONE PER UNIT ADDED TO THE OVERALL SHADE | | | TREE AND FLOWERING TREE REQUIREMENT. SHOW TOTAL | | | REQUIRED AND PROVIDED. | | | CALCULATE THE TREE (1/1500), FLOWERING TREE (1 /6000) | | | AND SHRUB (1/500) COUNTS BASED ON THE OPEN SPACE SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE PROVIDED FOR EACH PHASE PER SECTION 94-442(C), | | | THEN ADD THE ADDITIONAL TREES PER UNIT FOR BOTH PHASES. | | | | | | | | | 10. NOT SATISFIED. SHOW LINEAR FOOTAGE OF LANDSCAPED | | | AREA ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING MEETS THE REQUIREMENT OF | | | 40 PERCENT PER SECTION 94-443(D)(2) B. | | | PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR BUILDING PERIMETER, REQUIRED | | | AND PROVIDED LINEAR FEET OF LANDSCAPED AREA FOR | | | BUILDINGS IN BOTH PHASES. | | | | | | | | | 11. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION | | | 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF | | | PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | PROVIDE THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST. | | | PROVIDE THE PERCENTAGE AFTER ADJUSTMENTS FOR NATIVE | | | PLANTS ON PLANT LIST PER COMMENT 16. | | | | | | | | | | | | 12. NOT SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS | | | ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH | | | LANDSCAPING. | | | THE REASON TO FIND OUT THE LOCATION IS TO AVOID | | | PLACEMENT OF THE TRANSFORMER IN LANDSCAPE ISLANDS THAT | | | WOULD DISPLACE THE TREE REQUIRED BY CODE. THIS NEEDS TO | | | BE CLEAR FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE | | | PLANS. | | | | | | 13. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DETAIL AND LOCATIONS | | | OF ROOT BARRIERS TO SEPARATE LANDSCAPING FROM UTILITY | | | LINES. | | | DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER LINES NEED TO BE SHOWN ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. THERE ARE MULTIPLE CONFLICTS BETWEEN | | | REQUIRED TREES AND UTILITIES. THERE NEEDS TO BE | | | COORDINATION BETWEEN THE ENGINEER AND LANDSCAPE | | | ARCHITECT TO CORRECT THESE CONFLICTS. | | | | | | 14. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND | | | MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | ALL UTILITY VALVES, FIRE LINES, A/C UNITS, ETC. NEED TO | | | BE SHOWN AND SCREENING HEDGES PROVIDED. | | | | | | | | | 15. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE | | | LIGHTING ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY | | | CONFLICTS WITH TREES. | | | LIGHTING LOCATIONS ARE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO | | | AVOID CONFLICTS WITH REQUIRED TREES, BUT SITE PLAN AND | | | ENGINEERING PLANS SHOW THE LIGHT POLES IN LANDSCAPE | | | ISLANDS IN CONFLICT WITH REQUIRED TREES. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 3/3/20: | | | 16. SHORE JUNIPER AND VIBURNUM SUSPENSUM ARE NOT | | | FLORIDA NATIVE PLANTS. THEY ARE NATIVE TO JAPAN. | | | | | | 17. PHASE 1 PLAN DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENT FOR 75% | | | OF THE REQUIRED PARKING LOT TREES TO BE CATEGORY 1 | | | TREES SUCH AS LIVE OAK TO PROVIDE SHADE FOR THE PARKING | | | SPACES PER SECTION 94-443 (C)(3). | | | | | | 18. PHASE 2 PLAN IS MISSING REQUIRED TREES IN TERMINAL | | | LANDSCAPE ISLANDS, AND DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENT | | | FOR 75% OF THE REQUIRED PARKING LOT TREES TO BE | | | CATEGORY 1 TREES SUCH AS LIVE OAK TO PROVIDE SHADE FOR | | | THE PARKING SPACES. | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-09-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-09-2019 |
Time |
17:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-09-2019 |
Time |
17:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-09-09 17:40:34 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 3404 BROADWAY MIXED USE Z19080025 | | | SEPTEMBER 9, 2019 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THE APPLICANT MAY DO A COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PLAN | | | FOR THE ENTIRE SITE AND PROVIDE A PHASING PLAN OR | | | PROVIDE TWO SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PLANS, ONE FOR EACH | | | PHASE. ALL PLANS MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY AND DISPOSITION CHART OF THE | | | TREES WITHIN THE AFFECTED AREA AND INDICATE IF THEY | | | WILL BE PRESERVED IN PLACE, RELOCATED OR REMOVED. LIST | | | THE BOTANICAL NAME AND PROVIDE THE CANOPY DIAMETER. | | | CALCULATE THE REQUIRED MITIGATION IN SQUARE FOOTAGE. | | | ? SHOW CALCULATIONS FOR CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED ON | | | DIAMETER, 1:1 SAME CATEGORY IF UNDER 20 FEET, ACTUAL | | | AREA 20 FEET OR MORE WITHIN THE DISPOSITION CHART. | | | ? ADD THE SUM OF ALL TREE CANOPY MITIGATION TO SHOW THE | | | TOTAL MITIGATION DUE. | | | ? SHOW THE MITIGATION PROVIDED CALCULATION FOR ALL | | | TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED WITH THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE DESIGN | | | OPTIONS CHART SECTION 94-446 (G) AND PROVIDE THE | | | REQUIRED 50 POINTS. | | | | | | 4. PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING THE PARKING LANDSCAPE AREAS | | | COUNTED TOWARD COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-443(C)(3) AND | | | (4) AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 5. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED BUFFER TREES AT | | | ONE FOR EVERY 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF FOR ALL BUFFER | | | LENGTHS, AND SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED. | | | | | | 6. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF REQUIRED 10 FOOT LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFERS ON THE BROADWAY AND 33RD STREET SIDES OF THE | | | PROJECT PER SECTION 94-443(D). SHOW THE BUFFER WIDTH | | | PROVIDED ON THE EAST PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 7. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED BUFFER TREES WITHIN THE | | | PROPERTY LINE OF THE PROJECT. TREES MAY BE PLACED | | | ANYWHERE WITHIN THE AREA BETWEEN THE PROPERTY LINE AND | | | BUILDING. SHRUBS MAY BE PLACED BETWEEN THE CURB AND | | | SIDEWALK AS PART OF ROADWAY BEAUTIFICATION TO SEPARATE | | | THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AREAS FROM TRAFFIC. | | | | | | 8. PROVIDE HEDGES TO SCREEN ALL PARKING AREAS FROM | | | ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND STREETS. | | | | | | | | | 9. MULTIFAMILY REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-443(D) SHALL | | | APPLY FOR THE ADDITIONAL TREES REQUIRED AT ONE PER UNIT | | | ADDED TO THE OVERALL SHADE TREE AND FLOWERING TREE | | | REQUIREMENT. SHOW TOTAL REQUIRED AND PROVIDED. | | | | | | | | | 10. SHOW LINEAR FOOTAGE OF LANDSCAPED AREA ADJACENT TO | | | THE BUILDING MEETS THE REQUIREMENT OF 40 PERCENT PER | | | SECTION 94-443(D)(2) B. | | | | | | | | | 11. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT | | | SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL | | | ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT | | | SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF | | | SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA | | | WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA | | | LANDSCAPES. | | | PROVIDE THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE BASED ON FINAL PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 12. SHOW LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS ON THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 13. PROVIDE A DETAIL AND LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO | | | SEPARATE LANDSCAPING FROM UTILITY LINES. | | | | | | 14. PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED VALVES AND | | | EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | | | | 15. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE LIGHTING ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS WITH TREES. | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-23-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
03-23-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
03-23-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-03-23 15:27:10 | APPROVED WITH CONDITION. | | | | | | A DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED DURING | | | THE BUILD PERMIT PROCESS. | | | | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-25-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
02-25-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
02-25-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-25 13:43:47 | PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS: | | | 1- LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID | | | WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE OF THE | | | DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR THAT WILL BE UTILIZED. | | | 2- UPDATED SITE DETAILS, SHEET A1.2, TO REFLECT THE | | | CORRECT ENCLOSURE SPEC. ENCLOSURE SPEC SHALL COMPLY TO | | | THE LATEST REVISION OF CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL | | | CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE STANDARD, CG-8. | | | 3- AUTO TURN FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE | | | 4- DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP | | | | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-09-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
09-09-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
09-09-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-09-09 11:08:41 | PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS: | | | - LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID | | | WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE OF THE | | | DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR THAT WILL BE UTILIZED. | | | - ENCLOSURE SPEC PER LATEST REVISION OF CITY OF WEST | | | PALM BEACH GENERAL CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE | | | STANDARD, CG-8. | | | - AUTO TURN FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE | | | - DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP | | | | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-28-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
02-28-2020 |
Time |
17:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
02-28-2020 |
Time |
17:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-28 17:51:47 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | FEBRUARY 21, 2020 SUBMITTAL REVIEW SET: | | | | | | 1. PRB'S ARE GENERALLY ARE NOT NEEDED IN A MANHOLE IF | | | THE INLET STRUCTURES UPSTREAM FROM THE MANHOLE HAVE | | | PRB'S. FOR EXAMPLE, MANHOLE STRUCTURES #103 AND #104 | | | WILL NOT NEED PRBS BECAUSE CATCH BASIN STRUCTURES #201 | | | AND #102 WILL HAVE PRB'S. . | | | | | | 2. EXPLAIN HOW THE PERIMETER WALL ELEVATION OF 17.25 | | | WAS DETERMINED WHEN 25-YEAR 72-HOUR PEAK STAGE IS | | | LISTED AS 17.60. | | | | | | 3. VERIFY THE PEAK STAGES (PRE- AND POST-DEVELOPMENT) | | | FOR THE 25-YEAR 3-DAY AND 100-YEAR 3-DAY DESIGN STORMS. | | | THE 25-YEAR PEAK STAGES ARE SHOWN TO BE HIGHER THAN THE | | | 100-YEAR PEAK STAGES. | | | | | | 4. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS SQUARE CORNERS FOR THE CURBING | | | AT THE NORTH END OF THE PARKING LOT BUT THE ENGINEERING | | | PLANS SHOW ROUNDED CURBING. | | | | | | 5. ADJUST THE ORIENTATION OF THE SITE LIGHT FIXTURE | | | NEXT TO THE CURB OPENING FOR DRAINAGE AT THE NORTH END | | | OF THE PARKING LOT ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS. THE SITE | | | PLAN SHOWS THE LIGHT OVER THE PARKING LOT. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-11-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
09-11-2019 |
Time |
11:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
09-11-2019 |
Time |
11:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-09-11 11:15:36 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | | | APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR | | | MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | 1. SUGGEST ADJUSTING THE PHASING LINE SO THAT DRAINAGE | | | PROPOSED TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN PHASE 1 WILL BE INCLUDED | | | IN THE PHASE 1 AREA. | | | | | | 2. THE CITY'S VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD 1929. THE CITY HAS | | | ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD 1988 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION | | | EQUATION TO NGVD 1929 IS PROVIDED ON THE SHEET(S). LIST | | | THE VERTICAL DATUM AND CONVERSION EQUATION ON ALL | | | SHEETS THAT CONTAIN ELEVATION INFORMATION. ADD | | | CONVERSION EQUATION TO THE SURVEY. | | | | | | 3. IS A TURNAROUND SPACE NEEDED IN THE NORTH PARKING | | | LOT? | | | | | | 4. CAP SERVICE LINES BACK TO THE MAIN. | | | | | | 5. CREATE A SWALE ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 6. PROVIDE CCTV OF THE 33RD STREET 72" STORM PIPE | | | BETWEEN EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES. | | | | | | 7. ENGINEERING PLANS ARE MISSING THE CERTIFICATE OF | | | AUTHORIZATION FOR THE ENGINEERING FIRM. | | | | | | 8. ONSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED PER SFWMD | | | CRITERIA FOR STORMWATER QUALITY TREATMENT AND PEAK FLOW | | | ATTENUATION. | | | | | | 9. ADD THE WEIR ELEVATION TO CS #105 ON THE PGD PLAN. | | | | | | 10. INDICATE ON THE PGD PLAN WHICH DRAINAGE STRUCTURES | | | WILL HAVE PRBS AND ON WHICH SIDE(S) OF THE STRUCTURES. | | | | | | 11. BROADWAY AVE IS MAINTAINED BY FDOT. ANY WORK WITHIN | | | THE BROADWAY AVE. RIGHT OF WAY WILL REQUIRE A PERMIT | | | FROM FDOT. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE | | | ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED | | | WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP PRIOR TO STARTING | | | CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-02-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
03-02-2020 |
Time |
13:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-03-02 13:29:23 | UNITY OF TITLE WILL BE REQUIRED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-10-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
09-10-2019 |
Time |
08:25 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-09-10 09:01:09 | 1. ADD CONVERSION TO NGVD-29 ON ALL PLANS. | | | 2. WHY ARE INVERT ELEVATIONS CROSSED OUT ON SURVEY? | | | 3. LEICA GPS IS NOT AN ORIGINATING BENCHMARK. SHOULD BE | | | LABELED AS BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY. | | | 4. DUMPSTER DOORS CANNOT OPEN INTO ALLEY. | | | 5. PHASE 1 PARKING LANES DURING CONSTRUCTION APPEAR TO | | | BE AN UNSAFE DRIVEWAY CONDITION. | | | 6. ALL DETAILS NEED TO BE PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH. | | | 7. RECOMMEND APPLICANT MEET WITH TRAFFIC AND | | | ENGINEERING. | | | 8. PLEASE REFER TO ENGINEERING CHECKLIST IN THE | | | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR REQUIRED INFORMATION PRIOR | | | TO RE-SUBMITTAL. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-07-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
07-07-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-07-07 10:15:04 | NO FURTHER COMMENTS. | | | | | | CONDITIONS: | | | 1. REPAVE BOTH SIDES OF 33RD STREET AND THE ALLEY FOR | | | 50 FT ON EITHER SIDE OF THE UNDERGROUND UTILITY TIE-IN | | | POINTS PER ENGINEERING STANDARD | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
05-20-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-05-20 16:48:29 | PASSED. | | | | | | | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
02-26-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-26 13:36:10 | TRAFFIC STUDY COMMENTS: | | | 1. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER. | | | 2. CONTRARY TO THE STATEMENT INDICATED ON PAGE 1 OF THE | | | TRAFFIC STUDY, THE PROJECT SITE IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN | | | THE TCEA. PLEASE REVISE. | | | 3. PLEASE INCLUDE COMMITTED TRIPS FROM THE COUNTY'S TPS | | | DATABASE IN THE ANALYSIS. | | | 4. THE SITE PLAN IS DIFFERENT THAN THE DESCRIPTION | | | PROVIDED ON PAGE 14 OF THE TRAFFIC STUDY. PLEASE VERIFY | | | AND REVISE. | | | | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | 5. PROVIDE A BUS STOP EASEMENT WITHIN THE PROPERTY NEAR | | | THE CORNER COFFEE SHOP FOR FUTURE BUS STOP. | | | 6. REPAVING BOTH SIDES OF 33RD STREET AND THE ALLEY FOR | | | 50 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE UNDERGROUND UTILITY | | | TIE-IN POINTS WILL BE REQUIRED PER ENGINEERING | | | STANDARD. | | | 7. PROVIDE AUTOTURN PATHS FOR GARBAGE PICK-UP. | | | | | | | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] | | | (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS) | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
09-09-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-09-09 15:12:31 | TRAFFIC STUDY COMMENTS: | | | 1. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER. | | | 2. PROVIDE A TRAFFIC STUDY. | | | 3. PROVIDE COORDINATE WITH ENGINEERING ON THE TRAFFIC | | | STUDY REQUIREMENTS. | | | 4. IDENTIFY THE POTENTIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT TO THE | | | NEIGHBORHOOD STREET. | | | 5. PLEASE CONSIDER CONNECTING 33RD STREET TO BROADWAY | | | TO MINIMIZE TRAFFIC IMPACT TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. | | | | | | | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | 6. INCLUDE REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING SPACES IN THE SITE | | | DATA TABLE AND INDICATE LOCATIONS OF THE REQUIRED | | | BICYCLE PARKING SPACES. | | | 7. PROVIDE AT LEAST 20 FEET OF QUEUING SPACE FOR THE | | | ENTRY GATE. QUEUED VEHICLES SHALL NOT OBSTRUCT ANY | | | VEHICULAR, PEDESTRIAN OR BICYCLE PATHS PER CITY CODE | | | SECTION 78-1. | | | 8. THE CITY DOES NOT SUPPORT ACCESS TO THE PARKING LOT | | | FROM THE ALLEY. | | | 9. IT IS THE CITY'S POLICY TO PROVIDE INTERCONNECTED | | | SYSTEM OF STREETS. PLEASE CONSIDER PROVIDING 15-FOOT | | | WIDE PAVEMENT IN THE ALLEY. | | | 10. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH ENGINEERING ON THE PLANNED | | | LANE ELIMINATION ON BROADWAY. | | | 11. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH PALMTRAN ON THE EXISTING BUS | | | STOP ON BROADWAY AND PROVIDE A BUS SHELTER. | | | 12. SHOW THE REQUIRED 20-FOOT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE. | | | 13. REPAVE 33RD STREET AND THE ALLEY ALONG THE SITE | | | FRONTAGE AFTER DRAINAGE AND WATER AND SEWAGE SERVICE | | | TIE IN. | | | | | | | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] | | | (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-08-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
07-08-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
07-08-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-07-14 15:12:38 | APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: | | | | | | 1.) THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO THE | | | ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.): A) AN | | | ACCESS EASEMENT FOR THE 3-FOOT SIDEWALK ENCROACHMENT | | | ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY SHALL BE PROVIDED; | | | B) REPAVE BOTH SIDES OF 33RD STREET AND THE ALLEY FOR | | | 50-FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE UNDERGROUND UTILITY | | | TIE-IN POINTS PER ENGINEERING STANDARD; C) EXECUTE A | | | UNITY OF TITLE FOR THE PROJECT SITE. | | | | | | 2.) THE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY BETWEEN THE PARKING LOT AND | | | THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE DESIGNED TO | | | MAINTAIN A.D.A. COMPLIANCE AT ALL TIMES. | | | | | | 3.) PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES OR | | | PALMS ON THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL | | | BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION. | | | | | | 4.) ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, INCLUDING NEW | | | CONSTRUCTION OR THE RENOVATION OR IMPROVEMENT OF ANY | | | EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS | | | ARE EQUAL OR GREATER THAN $750,000 IS SUBJECT TO THE | | | ART IN PUBLIC PLACES REQUIREMENT OF CHAPTER 78, ARTICLE | | | V, OF THE CITY'S CODE OF ORDINANCES. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-26-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
02-26-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
02-26-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-26 10:08:50 | *** COMMENTS PROVIDED IN ADDITION TO ZONING REVIEW | | | DATED 2/18/20 *** | | | | | | GENERAL COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) A TRAFFIC PERFORMANT STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW LETTER | | | FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING - | | | TRAFFIC DIVISION, INDICATING THAT THE PROJECT MEETS THE | | | TPS STANDARDS OF THE COUNTY IS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 2.) WHERE IS THE SURVEYOR GETTING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION | | | FROM? THE LEGAL DOES NOT SEEM TO BE ACCURATE (I.E. | | | BLOCK REFERENCE, PLAT BOOK AND PAGE NUMBER REFERENCE, | | | ETC.). PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. | | | | | | 3.) WHAT IS THE GENERAL TIMELINE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR | | | BOTH PHASE I AND PHASE II? | | | | | | 4.) ANY CHANGES TO THE PROJECT DATA TABLE (SHEET A1.0) | | | SHALL BE MADE CONSISTENT WITH THE CHANGES TO THE | | | PROJECT DATA TABLE ON THE COVER SHEET AND IN THE TABLES | | | IN THE PHASING SITE PLAN (SHEET A1.1). | | | | | | 5.) A SIDEWALK EASEMENT FOR THE 3 FT. SIDEWALK | | | ENCROACHMENT ONTO PRIVATE PROPERTY SHALL BE REQUIRED | | | PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY | | | (C.O.). | | | | | | 6.) TO DATE, THE SIGNED LETTER FROM THE OLD NORTHWOOD | | | HISTORIC DISTRICT NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION HAS NOT BEEN | | | RECEIVED. | | | | | | | | | SITE PLAN COMMENT: | | | | | | 1.) SURFACE PARKING AREA SHALL BE CONCEALED WITH A | | | STREET WALL ALONG ALL STREET FRONTAGES. [ZLDR | | | S.94-220(F)(3)] [11/7/19 REPEAT COMMENT - PER ZLDR | | | S.94-219(C), THE APPLICANT MAY SEEK A WAIVER FROM THIS | | | DESIGN STANDARD TO BE APPROVED BY THE ZONING BOARD OF | | | APPEALS.] | | | | | | 2.) OPEN-AIR PORCHES AND STOOPS, STAIRS AND RAMPS MAY | | | ENCROACH INTO ANY REQUIRED SETBACK TO A POINT NOT | | | CLOSER THAN 3 FT. TO THE PROPERTY LINE. THE PROJECT | | | DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE STANDARD. PLEASE ADDRESS. | | | [ZLDR S.94-220(B)(5)] [11/07/19 REPEAT COMMENT - | | | ALTHOUGH THE STEPS ALONG BROADWAY HAVE BEEN MODIFIED TO | | | MEET CODE, THE RAMP ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE | | | PROPERTY STILL SEEMS TO ENCROACH INTO THE REQUIRED 3 | | | FT. SETBACK] | | | | | | 3.) RAMP DETAIL PROVIDED ON SHEET A1.2 SHALL BE | | | MODIFIED TO MATCH ANY CORRECTION MADE WITH THE | | | PLACEMENT/LOCATION IN THE SITE PLAN. | | | | | | 4.) WHAT IS THE COMBINED HEIGHT OF THE METAL PICKET | | | FENCE AND THE RETAINING WALL ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY | | | LINE? THE FENCE/WALL CANNOT EXCEED 6 FT. IN HEIGHT | | | (OVERALL). ALSO, PROVIDE A DETAIL TO DEMONSTRATE | | | COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR S.94-220(D)(2) AND (3)] [11/7/19 | | | REPEAT/MODIFIED COMMENT] | | | | | | 5.) DETAIL OF THE FENCE/GATE ON BROADWAY IS MISSING. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE. [11/7/19 REPEAT/MODIFIED COMMENT - | | | ALTHOUGH RESPONSES TO STAFF'S COMMENTS IMPLIES THAT A | | | DETAIL HAD BEEN PROVIDED, IT SEEMS TO BE MISSING FROM | | | THE PLAN.] | | | | | | 6.) METAL PICKET FENCE IN THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS DO | | | NOT MATCH THE DETAIL PROVIDED ON SHEET A1.2. PLEASE | | | ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. | | | | | | 7.) ACCORDING TO THE CIVIL PLANS, A LIGHT POLE FIXTURE | | | ALONG BROADWAY WILL BE RELOCATED. THIS SHOULD BE | | | REFERENCED IN ALL OTHER PLANS FOR CONSISTENCY. ALSO, | | | NOTE THAT THE LOCATION OF THE "EXISTING" POLE FIXTURE | | | IS INCONSISTENT (I.E. SHIFTED). ADDRESS FOR | | | CONSISTENCY. | | | | | | 8.) PARKING STALL STRIPING DETAIL SHALL BE CONSISTENT | | | WITH THE CITY'S STALL STRIPING STANDARDS PER ZLDR | | | S.94-485. THE DETAIL PROVIDED ON SHEETS A1.2 AND PD6 IS | | | INCONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S STANDARDS. | | | | | | 9.) FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS IN THE PROJECT DATA TABULAR | | | REQUIRED: A) CHECK THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION. IT SEEMS TO | | | BE INCORRECT (SEE GENERAL COMMENTS NOTE ON SURVEY); B) | | | CHECK LOT COVERAGE AND BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE | | | CALCULATIONS (THE NUMBERS SEEM TO BE OFF); C) SHOW THAT | | | THE MAXIMUM FRONT SETBACK ALONG BROADWAY IS 15 FT. (NOT | | | 5 FT.); D) CHECK UNIT CALCULATIONS IN THE RESIDENTIAL | | | DENSITY BREAKDOWN (PHASE I COUNT IS INCORRECT). | | | | | | 10.) COVER PAGE TITLE STATES THAT THE PROJECT IS A "24 | | | RESIDENTIAL UNIT DEVELOPMENT" (NOT 23). PLEASE CORRECT | | | FOR CONSISTENCY. | | | | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL (FLOOR PLAN AND ELEVATIONS) COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) FLAT ROOFS SHALL BE ENCLOSED BY A PARAPET NO LESS | | | THAN 42 INCHES IN HEIGHT. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE | | | BY PROVIDING DIMENSIONS IN THE ELEVATIONAL DRAWINGS. | | | [ZLDR S.94-220(D)(9)] [11/7/19 - REPEAT COMMENT - PER | | | ZLDR S.94-219(C), THE APPLICANT MAY SEEK A WAIVER FROM | | | THIS DESIGN STANDARD TO BE APPROVED BY THE ZONING BOARD | | | OF APPEALS.] | | | | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TWELVE | | | (12) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 INCHES X | | | 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 INCHES, AND | | | AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY | | | RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE | | | ($200.00). | | | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE | | | QUESTIONS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-07-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
11-07-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
11-07-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-11-07 14:33:15 | *** COMMENTS PROVIDED IN ADDITION TO ZONING REVIEW | | | DATED 9/10/19 *** | | | | | | GENERAL COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE SURVEY (DATED | | | 7/15/19). THE SURVEY HAS BEEN DEEMED INADEQUATE: | | | ABSTRACTED SURVEY IS REQUIRED; LOT SIZE CALCULATION | | | DOES NOT ADD UP; NO LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROVIDED. | | | | | | 2.) A TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW LETTER | | | FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING - | | | TRAFFIC DIVISION, INDICATING THAT THE PROJECT MEETS THE | | | TPS STANDARDS OF THE COUNTY IS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 3.) ANY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT REQUIRES A SCHOOL CAPACITY | | | AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION (SCAD) LETTER FROM THE | | | SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY. PLEASE PROVIDE. | | | | | | 4.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE PUBLIC | | | UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR | | | WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE | | | COLLECTION. PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT (561) 494-1040. | | | | | | 5.) A LETTER FROM COMCAST CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED | | | PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR | | | OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THEIR | | | SERVICES IS STILL MISSING. PLEASE PROVIDE. | | | | | | | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) DIMENSIONS OF THE PARCEL (PER THE SURVEY) SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN. | | | | | | 2.) EXISTING STRUCTURES IDENTIFIED IN THE SUBMITTED | | | SURVEY DOES NOT MATCH THE EXACT LOCATION PROVIDED IN | | | THE SITE PLAN (I.E. EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURES, ETC.). | | | PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. | | | | | | 3.) SURVEY IDENTIFIES OVERHEAD LINES RUNNING THROUGH | | | THE PROPERTY; HOWEVER, THE LINES ARE NOT DEPICTED IN | | | THE SITE PLAN. IF THE LINES ARE TO BE RELOCATED, THEN | | | THE PLAN MUST BE NOTATED AS SUCH. | | | | | | 4.) FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS IN THE PROJECT DATA TABULAR | | | REQUIRED: PARCEL SIZE INFORMATION IS INCONSISTENT WITH | | | THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE SURVEY; LEGAL | | | DESCRIPTION SEEMS TO BE INCORRECT; CURRENT LAND USE IS | | | MIXED USE (NOT MULTIFAMILY); CHECK LOT COVERAGE | | | CALCULATIONS FOR CONSISTENCY; PROVIDE BUILDING FRONTAGE | | | CALCULATIONS THAT SHOW THAT THE BUILDINGS MEET THE | | | MINIMUM 80% FRONTAGE REQUIREMENT ALONG BROADWAY [ZLDR | | | S.94-220(B)(1)]; SHOW THAT THE MAXIMUM FRONT SETBACK | | | ALONG BROADWAY IS 5 FT. (NOT 4 FT.); CLARIFY THAT THE | | | REAR SETBACK IS A MINIMUM OF 15 FT.; WHERE DID THE | | | REQUIRED SIDE SETBACK INFORMATION COME FROM? | | | | | | 5.) ANY CHANGES TO THE PROJECT DATA TABLE (SHEET A1.0) | | | SHALL BE MADE CONSISTENT WITH THE CHANGES TO THE | | | PROJECT DATA TABLE ON THE COVER SHEET AND IN THE TABLES | | | IN THE PHASING SITE PLAN (SHEET A1.1). | | | | | | 6.) SHOW REAR BUILDING SETBACK TO THE PROPERTY LINE TO | | | DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH ZLDR S.94-220(B)(4) AND | | | CONSISTENCY WITH THE PROJECT DATA TABLE. | | | | | | 7.) OPEN-AIR PORCHES AND STOOPS, STAIRS AND RAMPS MAY | | | ENCROACH INTO ANY REQUIRED SETBACK TO A POINT NOT | | | CLOSER THAN 3 FT. TO THE PROPERTY LINE. THE PROJECT | | | DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE STANDARD. PLEASE ADDRESS. | | | [ZLDR S.94-220(B)(5)] | | | | | | 8.) SIDEWALKS ALONG BROADWAY SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 8 | | | FT. IN CLEAR WIDTH. THE PROPOSED PLAN DOES NOT HAVE AN | | | 8 FT. CLEARANCE FOR THE SIDEWALK ALONG BROADWAY. [ZLDR | | | S.94-220(B)(6)] | | | | | | 9.) HEIGHT INFORMATION OF THE PROPOSED PERIMETER FENCE | | | (NORTH, EAST AND SOUTH) SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE SITE | | | PLAN FOR CONSISTENCY. | | | | | | 10.) PLEASE INCLUDE A DETAIL OF THE PROPOSED FENCE(S) | | | AND GATE(S) TO DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENCY WITH THE | | | ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS OF ZLDR S.94-220(D)(2). | | | | | | 11.) PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, | | | INCLUDING DIMENSIONS AND MATERIAL USED FOR THE | | | ENCLOSURE. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE | | | SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL OF THE | | | BUILDING. [ZLDR S.94-220(D)(9)] | | | | | | 12.) SURFACE PARKING AREA SHALL BE CONCEALED WITH A | | | STREET WALL ALONG ALL STREET FRONTAGES. [ZLDR | | | S.94-220(F)(3)] | | | | | | 13.) LIGHT POLE FIXTURES SHALL BE SETBACK AT LEAST 5 | | | FT. FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS | | | TO ILLUSTRATE COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR S.94-304(B)] | | | | | | 14.) BICYCLE PARKING REQUIRED. INCLUDE A DETAIL OF THE | | | RACK. [ZLDR S.94-485(Q)] | | | | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL (FLOOR PLAN AND ELEVATIONS) COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) PURSUANT TO ZLDR S.94-220(D)(5), BUILDINGS SHALL | | | HAVE CLEAR GLAZED AREAS AND OPENINGS EQUAL TO 25 TO 45 | | | PERCENT OF THE FACADE AREA. THE FENESTRATION | | | CALCULATIONS PROVIDED ON SHEET A5.1 SHOWS THAT THE | | | SOUTH FA?ADE IS INCONSISTENT WITH THIS ARCHITECTURAL | | | STANDARD. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE CLARIFY IF THE | | | FENESTRATION CALCULATIONS ADDRESS EACH BUILDING. | | | | | | 2.) PLEASE ADDRESS OR PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING NOTES FOR | | | CONSISTENCY WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS OF BMUD | | | BUILDING TYPE I: ALL EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL BE HINGED; | | | WINDOWS SHALL BE RECESSED A MINIMUM OF 2-INCHES FROM | | | THE EXTERIOR FACE OF THE FA?ADE. | | | | | | 3.) A NOTE AND/OR ILLUSTRATION, DEMONSTRATING THAT ALL | | | ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (AS PROVIDED ON SHEET | | | A2.1) SHALL BE SCREENED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR | | | S.94-220(D)(7) SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE PLAN. | | | | | | 4.) FLAT ROOFS SHALL BE ENCLOSED BY A PARAPET NO LESS | | | THAN 42 INCHES IN HEIGHT. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE | | | BY PROVIDING DIMENSIONS IN THE ELEVATIONAL DRAWINGS. | | | [ZLDR S.94-220(D)(9)] | | | | | | 5.) ARE THE RESIDENTS GOING TO HAVE ACCESS TO THE | | | ROOFTOP AND IF SO, WHAT WILL THE COMMON ROOFTOP SPACE | | | BE UTILIZED FOR? PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | | | | 6.) HOW HIGH IS THE ENTRANCE GATE/WALL ALONG BROADWAY? | | | | | | 7.) BUILDING FACADE ALONG BROADWAY CAN BE ENHANCED BY | | | PROVIDING ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES (I.E. BROWS | | | ABOVE THE FRONT DOORS, ETC.) | | | | | | | | | SIGNAGE COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) ELEVATION DRAWINGS (SHEET A5.1) SHOW PROPOSED | | | SIGNAGE ALONG THE WEST BUILDING FRONTAGE. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE DETAILS ON THE PROPOSED SIGNAGE. SIGN DETAIL | | | MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ZLDR S.94-220(E). | | | | | | | | | PHOTOMETRIC COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) SHOW SETBACK DISTANCE OF ALL LIGHT POLE FIXTURES IN | | | THE PLAN. | | | | | | 2.) THE FOLLOWING NOTE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE PLAN: | | | ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE GLARE | | | AND SHALL BE ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE AWAY | | | FROM ALL ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT | | | RESIDENCES, OR PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES. [ZLDR S.94-309] | | | | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TWELVE | | | (12) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 INCHES X | | | 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 INCHES, AND | | | AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY | | | RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE | | | ($200.00). | | | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE | | | QUESTIONS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-06-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pgreilic |
Date |
09-06-2019 |
Time |
14:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pgreilic |
Date |
09-06-2019 |
Time |
14:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-09-06 14:13:56 | 3404 BROADWAY APARTMENTS | | | ISPR 19-07 | | | Z19080025 | | | | | | ---ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, INCLUDING NEW | | | CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR IMPROVEMENT OF AN | | | EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS | | | ARE EQUAL OR GREATER THAN $750,000 IS SUBJECT TO THE | | | ART IN PUBLIC PLACES REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 78, | | | ARTICLE V, OF THE CITY?S CODE OF ORDINANCES. CONTACT | | | SYBILLE WELTER @ 561-822-1521 OR [email protected] FOR | | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION | | | ---PROVIDE LETTERS FROM ALL OF THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC | | | UTILITIES CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT | | | ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE | | | WITH THE PROVISION OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, FPU, FPL, | | | AND COMCAST | | | ---PROPOSED STEP-UPS CANNOT ENCROACH INTO THE REQUIRED | | | 8 FT. SIDEWALK ALONG BROADWAY. PLEASE REVISE. | | | ---CONSIDER PROVIDING A DEEPER SETBACK ON BROADWAY IN | | | TANDEM WITH REQUIRED LANDSCAPING. ONE SOLUTION COULD BE | | | TO REMOVE THE CENTRAL HALLWAY AND PROVIDE ACCESS FOR | | | ALL UNITS ON EITHER SIDE DIRECTLY ACCESSIBLE FROM THE | | | OUTSIDE. | | | ---CONSIDER THE ADDITION OF LARGER STOOPS/PORCHES ON | | | FIRST FLOOR UNITS TO PROVIDE FOR ADDITIONAL OUTDOOR | | | SPACE FOR RESIDENTS | | | ---REDUCE THE DEPTH OF PARKING SPACES WHERE POSSIBLE BY | | | INCLUDING A 2-FOOT OVERHANG. THE CURB WOULD FUNCTION AS | | | WHEEL STOPS. ALSO CONSIDER THE INCLUSION OF SMALL CAR | | | SPACES TO REDUCE OVERALL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA. A | | | PORTION OF SPACES CAN ALSO BE ?COMPACT SPACES? WITH | | | SMALLER DIMENSIONS | | | ---STAFF SUPPORTS A THOUGHTFUL CONSIDERATION OF WHERE | | | THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING SHOULD BE PLACED ON THE SITE. | | | EACH PHASE WILL BE REQUIRED TO STAND ALONE IN REGARD TO | | | CODE REQUIREMENTS IN THE EVENT THAT THE SECOND PHASE IS | | | NOT CONSTRUCTED. PLEASE INSTRUCT LA TO REFERENCE THE | | | CITY?S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. | | | ---PROVIDE BIKE RACK ON SITE WITH CURRENT CITY DETAIL | | | PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-485 | | | ---PROVIDE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD DETAILS FOR | | | PARKING SPACES, BIKE RACKS, DUMPSTER | | | ---PROVIDE ELECTRONIC COPIES OF ALL SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS | | | VIA CD OR THUMB DRIVE | | | ---CONTACT ALLISON JUSTICE, DEPUTY DIRECTOR FOR THE CRA | | | FOR COORDINATION: (561)-822-1553 [email protected] | | | | | | ***WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 15 | | | (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 INCHES X | | | 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 X 17 INCHES, AND AN | | | ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE CHANGES ON | | | THE RESUBMITTED PLAN MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | ***PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. | | | | | | ***CONTACT PAUL GREILICH, SENIOR PLANNER @ 561-822-1443 | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |