 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z19080020
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z19080020 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-10-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
09-11-2019 |
Time |
21:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
09-10-2019 |
Time |
21:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-09-10 21:30:37 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES WITHIN THE | | | PARKING GARAGE. SHEET Z1 SHOWS THE 1ST AND 2ND FLOOR | | | ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES LOCATED SUCH THAT THEY ARE | | | NOT THE CLOSEST PARKING SPACES TO THE RETAIL UNIT OR | | | THE ELEVATORS. ONE OF THE ACCESSSIBLE PARKING SPACES | | | SHOULD BE THE CLOSEST PARKING SPACE TO ONE OF THE | | | RETAIL ENTRY DOORS, AND THE REMAINING ACCESSIBLE | | | PARKING SPACES ON THE 1ST AND 2ND FLOORS SHOULD BE THE | | | CLOSEST PARKING SPACES TO THE ELEVATORS. PER SECTION | | | 208.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING | | | SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE | | | OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE | | | ENTRANCE. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL | | | COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE. | | | | | | 3. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. NONE OF THE | | | ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES HAVE BEEN DESIGNATED AS VAN | | | ACCESSIBLE. TWO OF THEM SHOULD BE SO DESIGNATED. PER | | | SECTION 208.2.4 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN | | | EVERY SIX REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN | | | A PARKING STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND | | | DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA | | | ACCESSIBILITY CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 | | | INCHES AT SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE) | | | | | | 4. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE AISLE. WHEN ADDRESSING | | | COMMENT # 2 ABOVE, PLEASE MAINTAIN THE CONDITIONS SUCH | | | THAT ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE ACCESS AISLES ARE LOCATED | | | SO THAT THE USER IS NOT COMPELLED TO WALK OR WHEEL | | | BEHIND ANOTHER PARKED VEHICLE OR IN THE TRAVEL LANE. | | | THE ACCESS AISLES SHALL ALSO COMPLY WITH THE OTHER | | | PROVISIONS OF SECTION OF 502.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY | | | CODE. | | | | | | 5. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE FOR THE EXISTING | | | BANK/OFFICE BUILDING. SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1 SHOWS 9 | | | EXISTING PARKING SPACES REMAINING. AN ACCESSIBLE | | | PARKING SPACE IS REQUIRED. IF THE ACCESSIBLE SURFACE | | | PARKING SPACE IS INTENDED TO SERVE THAT PURPOSE, PLEASE | | | RELOCATE IT SUCH THAT IT IS THE CLOSEST PARKING SPACE | | | TO THE BANK/OFFICE BUILDING ENTRANCE AND SUCH THAT THE | | | USER IS NOT COMPELLED TO WALK OR WHEEL BEHIND ANOTHER | | | PARKED VEHICLE OR IN THE TRAVEL LANE. PER SECTION 208.3 | | | OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING | | | SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE | | | OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE | | | ENTRANCE. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL | | | COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE. | | | | | | 6. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR | | | THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, | | | AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 7. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND | | | OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF | | | OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE | | | VERIFIED. | | | | | | 8. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES | | | NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO | | | MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL | | | BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE | | | EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED | | | TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR | | | OTHER APPROVED METHODS. | | | | | | 9. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. IF THE RETAIL SPACE MIGHT | | | INCLUDE A RESTAURANT, A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE | | | REQUIRED. PLEASE CONTACT JEFFREY ODOMS, UTILITIES O&M | | | SUPERINTENDENT, PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT, FATS OILS | | | AND GREASE DIVISION, AT (561) 822-2172, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | 10. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, | | | GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND | | | OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS, | | | SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 11. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND | | | CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF | | | CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. | | | | | | 12. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER | | | AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY, | | | INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE | | | CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION | | | THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY. | | | | | | 13. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT | | | WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL | | | HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT | | | MICHAEL ORIO, GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 | | | 1080, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 14. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT | | | TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE | | | ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP | | | ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC | | | PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-06-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
05-06-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
05-06-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-18-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
02-18-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
02-18-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-18 07:28:46 | 1. SHEETS 3 & 4 ? PLEASE CORRECT SPELLING OF | | | ?DEMOLITION? ON PAGE TITLE. | | | 2. SHEET 8 ? PLEASE SHOW INLET / DRAINAGE STRUCTURE | | | POLLUTION PROTECTION. | | | 3. SHEET 9 ? PLEASE CLEARLY IDENTIFY EXISTING WATER | | | MAIN DETAILS ON DIXIE HWY. AND BANYAN BL. ? MATERIAL, | | | SIZE, VALVES ETC. | | | 4. SHEET 9 ? PLEASE REALIGN WATER TAP TO BE PARALLEL | | | FROM EXISTING WATER LINE( I.E. NO BENDS IF POSSIBLE). | | | 5. SHEET 9 ? PLEASE LABEL BANYAN BL. | | | 6. SHEET 9 ? PLEASE CLEARLY LABEL RIGHT OF WAY. | | | 7. SHEET 10 ? PLEASE CLEARLY IDENTIFY EXISTING WATER | | | MAIN DETAILS ON DIXIE HWY. AND BANYAN BL. ? MATERIAL, | | | SIZE, VALVES ETC. | | | 8. SHEET 10 ? PLEASE CLEARLY LABEL RIGHT OF WAY. | | | 9. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES | | | OF WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS. | | | 10. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING | | | APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT | | | SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING | | | SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED | | | LEAD-FREE DESIGN. | | | 11. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES | | | ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY | | | LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT | | | PARCELS. | | | 12. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES | | | ARE BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL | | | ADDRESSES. | | | 13. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING | | | APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT | | | SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING | | | SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED | | | LEAD-FREE DESIGN. | | | 14. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL PROVIDE SANITARY | | | ELEVATIONS AT MANHOLE TIE-IN. | | | 15. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES | | | ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY | | | LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT | | | PARCELS. | | | 16. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES | | | ARE BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL | | | ADDRESSES. | | | 17. PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING. | | | | | | COMMENTS BELOW PER MARK HURLEY, PUBLIC UTILITIES | | | CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, [email protected] | | | | | | 18. -DETAIL A ON SHEET 9 DOES NOT HAVE ENOUGH DETAIL. | | | METER & BACKFLOW SIZES NEEDS TO BE DETERMINED AND | | | LABELED AS THE SPACE REQUIREMENT CAN BE SUBSTANTIALLY | | | DIFFERENT BETWEEN SIZES. SHOWING 15FT UE RUNNING N-S, | | | BUT MAY NEED GO E-W WITH A LARGER METER. NEED REFERENCE | | | THE APPROPRIATE WS SD # ON EACH LABEL. IF DOMESTIC | | | METER IS 3 IN. OR LARGER IT NEEDS TO BE ABOVE-GROUND | | | VIA WS-8 (ALSO LABEL AS DOMESTIC). NEED A POINT OF | | | SERVICE GATE VALVE FOR FIRELINE AFTER THE BRANCH AT THE | | | PROPERTY LINE AND LABEL IT. PIPE MATERIAL AFTER 8 | | | IN.TAP NEED BE LABELED. THERE IS A GATE VALVE ICON FOR | | | THE ?R.P.B.A? AND SHOULD BE REPLACED WITH BACKFLOW | | | ASSEMBLY ICON. | | | 19. -DEMAND CHART DOES NOT SHOW IRRIGATION. WILL THERE | | | BE ANY IRRIGATION USE? | | | 20. -ON SHEET 10, EXISTING WATER MAIN NOT LABELED WITH | | | PIPE MATERIAL. DCDA SIZE NEEDS TO BE DETERMINED AS MAY | | | NOT NEED 8 IN. TAP IF SMALL SIZED DCDA (ALSO LABEL WITH | | | WS SD# REFERENCE). FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND | | | ASSOCIATED PIPING APPEARS TO BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF | | | PROPERTY LINE -> SHOULD BE LOCATED INSIDE PROPERTY LINE | | | (SHIFT WEST). | | | 21. -ON SHEET 10, IS 10 FT SQUARE UTILITY EASEMENT | | | EXISTING? IF NOT, WHY IS IT BEING CREATED? IF NOT | | | REQUIRED, THEN MAY BE POSSIBLE TO ELIMINATE/REDUCE AND | | | SHIFT DCDA SOUTH SOME. | | | 22. -ON SHEET 10 REQUEST POINT OF SERVICE VALVE TO BE | | | RELOCATED SLIGHTLY NORTH OUT OF PAVER WALKWAY AND INTO | | | GRASS. | | | | | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | CONCERNS, THANKS. | | | RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-25-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
11-25-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
11-25-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-11-25 15:35:15 | 1) PLEASE SHOW NAVD 1988 TO NGVD 1929 CONVERSION ON ALL | | | SHEETS. | | | 2) PLEASE SHOW CONFLICTS AT UTILITY CROSSINGS IN RIGHT | | | OF WAY. | | | 3) PLEASE CLEARLY SHOW ENLARGED DETAIL OF AREA WITH | | | PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOWS AND METERS, AND COORDINATE WITH | | | MARK HURLEY OF PUBLIC UTILITIES CUSTOMER SERVICE AT | | | [email protected] OR 561-822-2262. | | | 4) PLEASE CLEARLY SHOW ENLARGED DETAIL OF AREA OF | | | PROPOSED MANHOLE ADJACENT TO COMMUNICATIONS VAULT. | | | 5) PLEASE LABEL BACKFLOWS PER MARKUP (RPPA, DCDA). | | | 6) PLEASE PROVIDE 15 FT. EASEMENT OVER METER PER | | | MARKUP. | | | 7) PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS ON PROPOSED TAPS (VALVES, | | | ETC.). | | | 8) PLEASE LABEL ALL CITY POINTS OF SERVICE. | | | 9) PLEASE SHOW SECOND TAP ON DIXIE HWY. PER MARKUP | | | (KEEP WATER SOURCE AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE). | | | 10) PLEASE CALL OUT PAVEMENT RESTORATION PER CITY OF | | | WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-9. | | | | | | FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER | | | SERVICE SUPERVISOR IN PUBLIC UTILITIES. | | | [email protected], 561-822-2240. | | | | | | -SOUTHERN U.E. LOOKS TO EXTEND TOO FAR SOUTH ? SHOULD | | | JUST BE WITHIN PROPERTY LINES. | | | | | | -EXISTING WATER UTILITIES ARE NOT LABELED WITH WHAT IS | | | HAPPENING TO THEM. FOR EXAMPLE -> SMALL WATER SERVICE, | | | METER & BOX ADJACENT SOUTHERN DCDA AND THE FIRE HYDRANT | | | ON WEST SIDE. | | | | | | - ?THE BACKFLOW OFF OF DIXIE IS PROPOSED TO BE MOUNTED | | | ON THE INSIDE OF THE GARAGE ENTRANCE? -> FIRELINE | | | BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES SHOULD NOT BE INSIDE BUILDINGS | | | UNLESS FIRE DEPARTMENT IS REQUIRING THEM TO BE INSIDE. | | | ALSO LIKE THEM TO BE HORIZONTAL AND SUPPORTED SIMILAR | | | TO THE STANDARD DETAIL, AND OUT OF SIDEWALK TRAFFIC. IF | | | THIS IS DOMESTIC BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY SHOULD BE LABELED | | | RPPA INSTEAD AND NONE OF THOSE SHOULD BE INSIDE | | | BUILDINGS. ALSO THIS WATER SERVICE IS AT AN UNSAFE AND | | | INCONVENIENT LOCATION FOR MAINTENANCE BEING AT THE | | | ENTRANCE FOR GARAGE -> SERVICE LINE SHOULD BE RELOCATED | | | AWAY FROM THERE. | | | | | | -WATER MAIN MATERIAL SUCH AS D.I.P. IS NOT WRITTEN ON | | | THE LABEL. | | | | | | -WATER MAIN CONFIGURATION ON BANYAN IS NOT SIMILAR TO | | | OUR GIS -> NOT SURE WHICH ONE IS WRONG. | | | | | | -FOR THE SOUTHERN FIRELINE OFF BANYAN, CANNOT TELL IF | | | IT IS INSIDE A BUILDING OR OUTSIDE. WOULD LIKE POINT OF | | | SERVICE VALVE ADDED JUST INSIDE UE TO BETTER ESTABLISH | | | POS AND REDUCE VALVE OPERATION ON STREET FOR SAFETY. | | | | | | -CANNOT FIND DOMESTIC METER ON PLAN. IT SHOULD BE AWAY | | | FROM VEHICLE TRAFFIC AND OUT OF SIDEWALK IN SMALL UE | | | OUTSIDE OF BUILDING AND BE ABOVE-GROUND IF 3? OR | | | LARGER. | | | | | | -THERE IS A LABEL FOR PROPOSED FIRELINE ON THE WEST | | | SIDE, BUT IT DOES NOT POINT TO ANYTHING. | | | | | | -SHEET DOES NOT HAVE DEMAND CHART SHOWING HOW MUCH | | | WATER PROPERTY WILL USE. | | | | | | -CITY IS DOING A STREETSCAPE PROJECT ON BANYAN AND PLAN | | | IS AT 90%. SHOULD CHECK WITH STREETSCAPE PROJECT TO SEE | | | HOW BANYAN WILL BE DIFFERENT AND IF ANY COLLABORATION | | | CAN TAKE PLACE. | | | | | | -FOR DOMESTIC WATER SERVICES ? UTILITIES RECOMMENDS | | | PARALLEL ASSEMBLIES SO CUSTOMERS WILL NOT BE WITHOUT | | | WATER DURING BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY MAINTENANCE. | | | | | | | | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | CONCERNS, THANKS. | | | | | | RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX | | | 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 MOBILE: (561) 246-9525 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-06-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
09-06-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
09-06-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-09-06 10:28:44 | 1. PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY | | | OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC | | | RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF | | | YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE | | | MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL | | | IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT | | | [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER | | | ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION | | | ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD | | | SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC. | | | 2. AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR | | | MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI | | | CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL | | | 3. PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS | | | OF ALL WATER, STORM WATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER | | | LINES, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER | | | AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, | | | METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE | | | SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING | | | GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, | | | ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL | | | INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER | | | LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE | | | PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN | | | VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. | | | ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND | | | PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER | | | OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & | | | TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL | | | UTILITY CROSSINGS. CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE, | | | AND REMOVE ANY ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 | | | INCHES FROM CITY RIGHT OF WAY. | | | 4. PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE | | | DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB | | | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION). | | | 5. SHOW DIMENSIONS OF DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE PER CURRENT | | | CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8. | | | 6. CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY | | | SEWER ARE REQUIRED. | | | 7. PLEASE CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA | | | AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA. | | | 8. PROVIDE VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER ALONG | | | ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE. | | | 9. PLEASE PROVIDE CLEANOUTS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY LINE | | | ONSITE JUST INSIDE PROPERTY LINE, AT JOINTS AND EVERY | | | 75 FEET. | | | 10. PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION | | | INFORMATION (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929). | | | 11. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | EASEMENT FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED WATER METERS. | | | 12. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION OF WATER | | | METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION. | | | 13. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES | | | OF WATER AND SEWER AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS. | | | 14. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING | | | APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT | | | SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING | | | SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED | | | LEAD-FREE DESIGN. | | | 15. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES | | | ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY | | | LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT | | | PARCELS. | | | 16. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES | | | ARE BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL | | | ADDRESSES. | | | 17. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, ADD NOTE TO PLANS | | | TO PROVIDE 50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON | | | EACH SIDE OF PROPOSED TRENCH IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY | | | AREAS PER CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-9. | | | 18. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SHOW CONFLICTS AT | | | ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. | | | 19. CONCEPTUAL PAVING AND DRAINAGE PLANS ARE DIFFICULT | | | TO READ; PLEASE PROVIDE SEPARATE WATER AND SEWER PLANS. | | | 20. PLEASE SHOW BANYAN BLVD. IMPROVEMENTS ON SOUTH SIDE | | | OF STREET ALONG PROJET FRONTAGE. | | | 21. PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-04-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
09-04-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
09-04-2019 |
Time |
14:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-09-04 15:23:54 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING IS FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL PURPOSES: | | | | | | 5A) THERE IS AN INDICATION OF A 2ND EGRESS AND EGRESS | | | PATH ALONG THE ROOF EDGE LEADING TO A 2ND STAIRWELL. | | | FOR PLAN SUBMITTAL PURPOSES, PLEASE REVIEA NAD PROVIDED | | | DETAILS ALONG THIS EXIT ROUTE IN COMPLIANCE NFPA 101, | | | CHAPTER 7, MEANS OF EGRESS. | | | | | | 5B) THE GROUND FLOOR PLAN APPEARS TO INDICATE EXITS | | | FROM MERCATILE/ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCIES INTO AND THROUGH | | | THE PARLING GARAGE/ STORAGE OCCUPANCY. PLEASE REVIEW | | | THE REQUIRMENTS OF THOSE NFPA 101 OCCUPANCIES AND | | | CHAPTER 7, MEANS OF EGRESS, AS EXITS THROUGH THE | | | STOPRAGE AREA IS IN CONFLICT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 5C) THE 5TH FLOOR AMENITY OUTDOOR DECK INDICATES 2 | | | STARIWELL EXITS; HOWEVER, THE OCCUPANCT LOAD IS NOT | | | PROVIDED. THE OCCUPANT LOAD MAY REQUIRE A 3RD EXIT, | | | AND/OR IF ANY OF THE DOORS LEADING OUT OF THE AMENITY | | | ROOM ARE PROPOSED TO BE EXITS FROM THE OUTDOOR DECK | | | AREA, THOSE DORS SHALL OPEN IN THE EXIT PATH OF TRAVEL; | | | IN-SWING. PLEASE REIVEW NFPA 101, CHAPTER 7, MMEANS OF | | | EGRESS AND THE CHAPTER 12 ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCIES FOR CODE | | | REQUIRE.MENTS | | | | | | | | | 6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A, | | | PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE, | | | INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE | | | OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES) | | | | | | 7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA | | | 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS | | | STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE | | | BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE | | | BEING CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED | | | TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE | | | PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION. | | | | | | IT IS RECOMMENDED FOR HIGH RISES HAVE TWO SEPARATE FDC | | | LOCATIONS REMOTELY LOCATED. | | | | | | PER NFPA 14 | | | | | | 6.4.5.4* FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED | | | NOT MORE THAN 100 FT (30.5 M) FROM THE NEAREST FIRE | | | HYDRANT CONNECTED TO AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY. | | | | | | PER NFPA 1 | | | | | | 18.3 WATER SUPPLIES. | | | 18.3.1* AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING | | | THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED TO ALL PREMISES UPON WHICH FACILITIES, | | | BUILDINGS, OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS ARE HEREAFTER | | | CONSTRUCTED OR MOVED INTO THE JURISDICTION. THE | | | APPROVED WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | SECTION 18.4. | | | | | | PER NFPA 14 SECTION 7.12.2, HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS SHALL | | | HAVE AT LEAST TWO REMOTELY LOCATED FIRE DEPARTMENT | | | CONNECTIONS FOR EACH ZONE. | | | PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004, | | | FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE | | | POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF | | | APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT, | | | CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR | | | AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER | | | SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA) | | | AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS | | | PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS. | | | FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE | | | PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES? | | | | | | 8. A CLASS ?A? NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM | | | SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP | | | DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY | | | INSTALLATION. | | | | | | 9. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7 | | | KEYWAY SYSTEM. | | | | | | ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S | | | EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA | | | B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS. | | | | | | ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN | | | WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL | | | LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET | | | MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER | | | ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN | | | AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE | | | IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION. | | | | | | 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED | | | ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTS WERE NOT EASILY IDENTIFIED OF | | | THE PLAN SHEETS. HOWEVER, ONE HYDRANT IS LOCATED ON THE | | | CORNER OF BANYAN AND N DIXIE. IT IS RECOMMENDED TO | | | PROVIDE AN FDC WITHIN 100' ALONG N DIXIE AND THE OTHER | | | FDC AND HYDRANT ALONG BANYAN ON SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE | | | BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND | | | FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET | | | OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER | | | ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES. | | | | | | 12. COMMAND ROOM | | | | | | IT IS RECOMMENDED TO HAVE ACCESS THE FIRE COMMAND ROOM | | | FROM AN EXTERIOR DOOR. THE PROPOSED PLAN INDICATES | | | ACCESS FROM THE INTERIOR, INSIDE THE PARKING GARAGE. IT | | | IS RECOMMENDED POSSIBLY SWITCH THE LOCATIONS OF THE | | | COMMAND ROOM AND FIRE PUMP ROOM, PROVIDING A MORE | | | EXTERIOR ACCESS WHILE NOT ADDING ADDITIONAL EXTERIOR | | | DOORS. | | | | | | THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1, | | | CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN | | | THE FOLLOWING FEATURES: | | | | | | A. SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 200 FT SQUARED WITH A MINIMUM | | | DIMENSION OF 10 FT. | | | B. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM. | | | C. A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED | | | ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM | | | D. SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL | | | FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF | | | EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING | | | EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS AND THE LOCATION | | | OF FIRE WALLS, FIRE BARRIERS, FIRE PARTITIONS, SMOKE | | | BARRIERS AND SMOKE PARTITIONS | | | E. A WORK TABLE. | | | F. IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN | | | FOR THE BUILDING. | | | G. THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | | | CONTROL UNIT. | | | H. ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION OF | | | THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL | | | I. STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR DISTRIBUTION | | | SYSTEMS. | | | J. CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS SIMULTANEOUSLY | | | K. SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY | | | PANELS | | | L. EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS | | | M. FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS | | | N. GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND | | | TRANSFER FEATURES. | | | O. PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED | | | BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE | | | P. CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL | | | Q. ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME | | | A17.1. | | | R. ELEVATOR EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER SELECTOR | | | SWITCH(ES), WHERE EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER IS | | | PROVIDED | | | | | | PER NFPA 101 | | | | | | 11.8.6* EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER. | | | 11.8.6.1 AN EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE PROVIDED | | | IN A | | | LOCATION APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. | | | 11.8.6.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL CONTAIN THE | | | FOLLOWING: | | | (1) VOICE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM PANELS AND CONTROLS | | | (2) FIRE DEPARTMENT TWO-WAY TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION | | | SERVICE | | | PANELS AND CONTROLS WHERE REQUIRED BY ANOTHER SECTION | | | OF THIS | | | CODE | | | (3) FIRE DETECTION AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATION | | | PANELS | | | (4) ELEVATOR FLOOR LOCATION AND OPERATION ANNUNCIATORS | | | (5) ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME | | | A17.1/CSA B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS AND ESCALATORS | | | (6) ELEVATOR EMERGENCY POWER SELECTOR SWITCH(ES) WHERE | | | PROVIDED | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME A17.1/CSA B44 | | | (7) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATERFLOW ANNUNCIATORS | | | (8) EMERGENCY GENERATOR STATUS INDICATORS | | | (9) CONTROLS FOR ANY AUTOMATIC STAIRWAY DOOR UNLOCKING | | | SYSTEM | | | (10) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS | | | (11) TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED | | | ACCESS TO THE | | | PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM | | | (12) STAIRWAY VIDEO MONITORING EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED BY | | | 11.8.8 | | | | | | | | | 13. RADIO | | | | | | NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY | | | RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES. | | | | | | 11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM | | | RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT | | | COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL | | | DETERMINED BY THE AHJ. | | | NFPA 72, 24.5.2* TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS | | | ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS. | | | 24.5.2.2 RADIO COVERAGE. RADIO COVERAGE SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE BUILDING AS A PERCENTAGE OF | | | FLOOR AREA AS SPECIFIED IN 24.5.2.2.1 THROUGH | | | 24.5.2.2.3. | | | 24.5.2.2.1 CRITICAL AREAS. CRITICAL AREAS, SUCH AS THE | | | EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER(S), THE FIRE PUMP ROOM(S), | | | EXIT STAIRS, EXIT PASSAGEWAYS, ELEVATOR LOBBIES, | | | STANDPIPE CABINETS, SPRINKLER SECTIONAL VALVE | | | LOCATIONS, AND OTHER AREAS DEEMED CRITICAL BY THE | | | AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH | | | 99 PERCENT FLOOR AREA RADIO COVERAGE. | | | 24.5.2.2.2 GENERAL BUILDING AREAS. GENERAL BUILDING | | | AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH 90 PERCENT FLOOR AREA | | | RADIO COVERAGE. | | | 24.5.2.3 SIGNAL STRENGTH. | | | 24.5.2.3.1 INBOUND. A MINIMUM INBOUND SIGNAL STRENGTH | | | OF -95 DBM, OR OTHER SIGNAL STRENGTH AS REQUIRED BY THE | | | AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL BE PROVIDED | | | THROUGHOUT THE COVERAGE AREA. | | | 24.5.2.3.2 OUTBOUND. A MINIMUM OUTBOUND SIGNAL STRENGTH | | | OF -95 DBM AT THE DONOR SITE, OR OTHER SIGNAL STRENGTH | | | AS REQUIRED BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED FROM THE COVERAGE AREA. | | | | | | THE SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL | | | STRENGTH OF -95 DBM FOR THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST | | | PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE. TESTING SHALL BE BY AN | | | ACCEPTABLE NATIONAL STANDARD DOCUMENTING PERCENTAGES | | | NOTED ABOVE AND BY ACTUAL RADIO TESTING BY FIRE | | | PERSONNEL. IF THE MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A | | | BI-DIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH | | | A MINIMUM 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP. | | | | | | 14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS | | | BUILDING,AS WELL AS, GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX | | | KEY ACCESS LOCKS, PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR | | | EMERGENCY ACCESS. | | | | | | 15. THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA | | | 101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE PROTECTION | | | EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING: | | | | | | THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED, | | | INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204, | | | STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY | | | RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR | | | RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY | | | HAVING JURISDICTION. | | | | | | THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE | | | INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE | | | APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED | | | MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE | | | SYSTEM. | | | | | | ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL | | | INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.9. | | | | | | 16. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 17. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-02-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
07-02-2020 |
Time |
15:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
07-02-2020 |
Time |
15:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-07-02 15:24:58 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 303 BANYAN Z19080020 | | | JULY 2, 2020 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN: | | | ? SATISFIED. TREES AND PALMS CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE TO | | | BE MITIGATED BASED ON CATEGORY. ANY TREES 20 FEET OR | | | MORE CANOPY DIAMETER TO BE MITIGATED BY ACTUAL SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE. 1:1 MITIGATION IS EQUAL TO THE CATEGORY VALUE. | | | BLACK OLIVE CATEGORY 1 EQUALS 300 SQ FT, YELLOW TAB | | | CATEGORY 2 EQUALS 150 SQ FT. | | | ? SATISFIED. INCLUDE EXISTING STREET TREES TO BE | | | REMOVED AND REPLACED ON BANYAN AND OLIVE. | | | #2228, 2229, 2230, 2231, 2232, AND 2233 NEED TO BE | | | SHOWN AS REMOVED AND MITIGATION DUE ADDED. | | | ? CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE OF MITIGATION FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED | | | TO BE REMOVED. | | | ADJUST AFTER CHANGES TO SITE LANDSCAPE AND STREET TREE | | | ADDITIONS. | | | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION VALUES BY CATEGORY | | | FOR THE PROPOSED TREES AND PALMS. | | | ADJUST AFTER CHANGES TO SITE LANDSCAPE AND STREET TREE | | | ADDITIONS. | | | | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE | | | TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR | | | RELOCATED. LIVE OAK TREES, THATCH PALM, AND SABAL PALMS | | | IN GOOD CONDITION CAN BE RELOCATED TO PUBLIC PROPERTY | | | IF THEY CANNOT BE USED ON SITE. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. THE STREETSCAPE CAN BE IMPROVED TO | | | ACCOMPLISH THE INTENT OF THE CODE SECTION 94-113. THE | | | PALMS MAY BE USED, BUT NOT AS COUNTING TOWARD THE TREE | | | REQUIREMENT AT THE MAXIMUM 30 FOOT SPACING. ADD CANOPY | | | TREES AS REQUIRED. TREE GRATES ARE NOT PREFERRED IF THE | | | SIDEWALK MEETS THE MINIMUM 8 FOOT WIDTH REQUIREMENT, | | | AND PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE USED INSTEAD. BANYAN | | | STREETSCAPE NEEDS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY | | | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. | | | STREET TREES NEED TO BE REPLACED ON BANYAN IN FRONT OF | | | THE EXISTING BUILDING, AND ON OLIVE AVE. ADJACENT TO | | | THE PROPERTY. PARKING SPACES NEE TO BE FINALIZED AS | | | PART OF THE DESIGN. IT WOULD BE BETTER TO SPREAD OUT | | | THE PARKING SPACES AND HAVE ALL TREES AT THE SAME | | | DISTANCE TO SHADE SIDEWALK. | | | | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. CALCULATIONS FOR STREET TREES NEED TO BE | | | CORRECTED. EXAMPLE- DIXIE FROM CURB AT BANYAN TO NORTH | | | PROPERTY LINE SCALES AS 160 FEET AND REQUIRES 6 TREES. | | | BANYAN SIDE MUST BE MEASURED FOR THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF | | | THE PROPERTY AND THE REQUIRED TREES RECALCULATED. OLIVE | | | SIDE MUST ALSO BE ADDED. EXISTING STREET TREES ARE TO | | | BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW TREES WITH STRUCTURAL | | | SOIL AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS SHOWN ON SHEETS | | | LP.3 AND LP.4 NEED TO BE LABELED AS THE SELECTED OPEN | | | SPACE TYPE AND FLOOR. ROOFTOP GARDEN IS ASSUMED, AS THE | | | REQUIREMENTS MATCH THIS OPEN SPACE TYPE. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. FUTURE SUBDIVISION LINE SHOWN DOES NOT | | | ALLOW FUTURE LOTS TO MEET THE 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER | | | REQUIREMENTS ADJACENT TO PARKING AREAS. | | | THE DISCUSSION WITH THE APPLICANT WAS TO REMOVE THE | | | LINE FROM THE PLANS. ANY SUBDIVISION PROPOSED IN THE | | | FUTURE MUST NOT CREATE A NONCONFORMITY WITH THE BUFFER | | | REQUIREMENT. IF THE PROPERTY IS APPROVED AS ONE SITE | | | PLAN AND A UNITY OF TITLE IS EXECUTED AS PART OF THE | | | SUBDIVISION, IT MAY BE POSSIBLE. | | | | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES ON | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN, ALSO LOCATIONS OF VALVES AND BACKFLOW | | | PREVENTERS AND FPL TRANSFORMERS. SCREENING MUST BE | | | PROVIDED. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF REQUIRED STRUCTURAL | | | SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE ADJACENT TO TREES. PROVIDE A | | | TYPICAL FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE STRUCTURAL SOIL AND | | | A SEPARATE PLAN SHOWING THE LOCATIONS. | | | ARE FOR STRUCTURAL SOIL AND PLANTING AREA SHOULD BE | | | APPROXIMATELY 14 FEET IN LENGTH AND 9 FEET IN WIDTH | | | RELATIVE TO THE BACK OF CURB SHOWN ON LP.1. STRUCTURAL | | | SOIL DETAIL IS TO SHOW THE CONSTRUCTION CROSS SECTION | | | FOR DEPTH OF 36 INCHES, AND PLANTING SOIL IN THE | | | PLANTING AREA ON SHEET LP.5. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. | | | PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT | | | MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF DROUGHT TOLERANT AND | | | NATIVE SPECIES ADDED BASED ON THE PROPOSED PLANT LIST. | | | | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. THE TERMINAL ISLAND AND REQUIRED TREE | | | NEED TO BE ADDED AT THE END OF THE ROW OF PARKING AT | | | THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY. | | | TERMINAL ISLAND TREES ARE MISSING FROM SEVERAL | | | LOCATIONS ADJACENT TO THE ROWS OF PARKING IN THE | | | SURFACE PARKING AREA. HEDGE MUST BE PROVIDED ALONG | | | STREET FRONTAGE. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 11/21/19: | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. DRAINAGE LINES AND DRAINS ARE IN | | | CONFLICT WITH THE TREE LOCATIONS FOR THE PUBLIC OPEN | | | SPACE. | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. FLORIDA FRIENDLY POINTS CANNOT BE | | | COUNTED TWICE IN THE SAME CATEGORY. EXAMPLE: IF TAKING | | | CREDIT FOR 51% NATIVE SHRUBS, CAN ONLY TAKE 25-50% FOR | | | DROUGHT TOLERANT SHRUBS. | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. CORRECT CANOPY AREA REQUIREMENTS FOR | | | OPEN SPACE ON SHEETS LP.2, LP.3 AND LP.4 TO READ ?TYPE? | | | INSTEAD OF ?CATEGORY?. | | | | | | 14. SATISFIED. ON SHEET LP-2 AND LP-3, HIBISCUS | | | SYRIACUS IS NOT VIABLE FOR THIS CLIMATE ZONE, IT IS | | | LIMITED TO ZONE 8. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 2/25/20: | | | 15. SATISFIED. STREET TREES ALONG OLIVE NEED TO BE | | | SPREAD OUT TOWARD CORNER AND DRIVEWAY TO COVER MORE OF | | | THE SIDEWALK. | | | | | | 16. SATISFIED. STREET TREES ALONG BANYAN NEED TO BE | | | SPREAD OUT TOWARD THE CORNER OF DIXIE, AND IN FRONT OF | | | THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. | | | | | | | | | 17. SATISFIED. STREET TREE AND BIKE RACKS NEED TO BE | | | ADJUSTED TO PRIORITIZE THE TREE AND THEN ADD THE BIKE | | | RACKS. THE RACKS CAN BE SEPARATED. | | | | | | 18. SATISFIED. STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL NEEDS TO SHOW | | | UNDER HARD SURFACES, NOT UNDER TREES. PLANTING SOIL | | | DEPTH IS 36 INCHES AROUND TREE. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 4/3/20: | | | 19. SATISFIED. ADDRESS LANDSCAPE COMMENTS INCLUDED IN | | | ZONING REVIEW COMMENTS. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. FINAL LOCATIONS | | | OF RELOCATED TREES AND PALMS WILL BE ESTABLISHED, AND | | | ANY MITIGATION RECALCULATED AT THE TIME OF PERMIT. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-03-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
04-03-2020 |
Time |
16:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
04-03-2020 |
Time |
16:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-04-03 16:36:30 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 303 BANYAN Z19080020 | | | APRIL 3, 2020 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN: | | | ? SATISFIED. TREES AND PALMS CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE TO | | | BE MITIGATED BASED ON CATEGORY. ANY TREES 20 FEET OR | | | MORE CANOPY DIAMETER TO BE MITIGATED BY ACTUAL SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE. 1:1 MITIGATION IS EQUAL TO THE CATEGORY VALUE. | | | BLACK OLIVE CATEGORY 1 EQUALS 300 SQ FT, YELLOW TAB | | | CATEGORY 2 EQUALS 150 SQ FT. | | | ? SATISFIED. INCLUDE EXISTING STREET TREES TO BE | | | REMOVED AND REPLACED ON BANYAN AND OLIVE. | | | #2228, 2229, 2230, 2231, 2232, AND 2233 NEED TO BE | | | SHOWN AS REMOVED AND MITIGATION DUE ADDED. | | | ? CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE OF MITIGATION FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED | | | TO BE REMOVED. | | | ADJUST AFTER CHANGES TO SITE LANDSCAPE AND STREET TREE | | | ADDITIONS. | | | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION VALUES BY CATEGORY | | | FOR THE PROPOSED TREES AND PALMS. | | | ADJUST AFTER CHANGES TO SITE LANDSCAPE AND STREET TREE | | | ADDITIONS. | | | | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE | | | TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR | | | RELOCATED. LIVE OAK TREES, THATCH PALM, AND SABAL PALMS | | | IN GOOD CONDITION CAN BE RELOCATED TO PUBLIC PROPERTY | | | IF THEY CANNOT BE USED ON SITE. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. THE STREETSCAPE CAN BE IMPROVED TO | | | ACCOMPLISH THE INTENT OF THE CODE SECTION 94-113. THE | | | PALMS MAY BE USED, BUT NOT AS COUNTING TOWARD THE TREE | | | REQUIREMENT AT THE MAXIMUM 30 FOOT SPACING. ADD CANOPY | | | TREES AS REQUIRED. TREE GRATES ARE NOT PREFERRED IF THE | | | SIDEWALK MEETS THE MINIMUM 8 FOOT WIDTH REQUIREMENT, | | | AND PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE USED INSTEAD. BANYAN | | | STREETSCAPE NEEDS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY | | | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. | | | STREET TREES NEED TO BE REPLACED ON BANYAN IN FRONT OF | | | THE EXISTING BUILDING, AND ON OLIVE AVE. ADJACENT TO | | | THE PROPERTY. PARKING SPACES NEE TO BE FINALIZED AS | | | PART OF THE DESIGN. IT WOULD BE BETTER TO SPREAD OUT | | | THE PARKING SPACES AND HAVE ALL TREES AT THE SAME | | | DISTANCE TO SHADE SIDEWALK. | | | | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. CALCULATIONS FOR STREET TREES NEED TO BE | | | CORRECTED. EXAMPLE- DIXIE FROM CURB AT BANYAN TO NORTH | | | PROPERTY LINE SCALES AS 160 FEET AND REQUIRES 6 TREES. | | | BANYAN SIDE MUST BE MEASURED FOR THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF | | | THE PROPERTY AND THE REQUIRED TREES RECALCULATED. OLIVE | | | SIDE MUST ALSO BE ADDED. EXISTING STREET TREES ARE TO | | | BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW TREES WITH STRUCTURAL | | | SOIL AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS SHOWN ON SHEETS | | | LP.3 AND LP.4 NEED TO BE LABELED AS THE SELECTED OPEN | | | SPACE TYPE AND FLOOR. ROOFTOP GARDEN IS ASSUMED, AS THE | | | REQUIREMENTS MATCH THIS OPEN SPACE TYPE. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. FUTURE SUBDIVISION LINE SHOWN DOES NOT | | | ALLOW FUTURE LOTS TO MEET THE 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER | | | REQUIREMENTS ADJACENT TO PARKING AREAS. | | | THE DISCUSSION WITH THE APPLICANT WAS TO REMOVE THE | | | LINE FROM THE PLANS. ANY SUBDIVISION PROPOSED IN THE | | | FUTURE MUST NOT CREATE A NONCONFORMITY WITH THE BUFFER | | | REQUIREMENT. IF THE PROPERTY IS APPROVED AS ONE SITE | | | PLAN AND A UNITY OF TITLE IS EXECUTED AS PART OF THE | | | SUBDIVISION, IT MAY BE POSSIBLE. | | | | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES ON | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN, ALSO LOCATIONS OF VALVES AND BACKFLOW | | | PREVENTERS AND FPL TRANSFORMERS. SCREENING MUST BE | | | PROVIDED. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF REQUIRED STRUCTURAL | | | SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE ADJACENT TO TREES. PROVIDE A | | | TYPICAL FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE STRUCTURAL SOIL AND | | | A SEPARATE PLAN SHOWING THE LOCATIONS. | | | ARE FOR STRUCTURAL SOIL AND PLANTING AREA SHOULD BE | | | APPROXIMATELY 14 FEET IN LENGTH AND 9 FEET IN WIDTH | | | RELATIVE TO THE BACK OF CURB SHOWN ON LP.1. STRUCTURAL | | | SOIL DETAIL IS TO SHOW THE CONSTRUCTION CROSS SECTION | | | FOR DEPTH OF 36 INCHES, AND PLANTING SOIL IN THE | | | PLANTING AREA ON SHEET LP.5. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. | | | PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT | | | MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF DROUGHT TOLERANT AND | | | NATIVE SPECIES ADDED BASED ON THE PROPOSED PLANT LIST. | | | | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. THE TERMINAL ISLAND AND REQUIRED TREE | | | NEED TO BE ADDED AT THE END OF THE ROW OF PARKING AT | | | THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY. | | | TERMINAL ISLAND TREES ARE MISSING FROM SEVERAL | | | LOCATIONS ADJACENT TO THE ROWS OF PARKING IN THE | | | SURFACE PARKING AREA. HEDGE MUST BE PROVIDED ALONG | | | STREET FRONTAGE. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 11/21/19: | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. DRAINAGE LINES AND DRAINS ARE IN | | | CONFLICT WITH THE TREE LOCATIONS FOR THE PUBLIC OPEN | | | SPACE. | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. FLORIDA FRIENDLY POINTS CANNOT BE | | | COUNTED TWICE IN THE SAME CATEGORY. EXAMPLE: IF TAKING | | | CREDIT FOR 51% NATIVE SHRUBS, CAN ONLY TAKE 25-50% FOR | | | DROUGHT TOLERANT SHRUBS. | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. CORRECT CANOPY AREA REQUIREMENTS FOR | | | OPEN SPACE ON SHEETS LP.2, LP.3 AND LP.4 TO READ ?TYPE? | | | INSTEAD OF ?CATEGORY?. | | | | | | 14. SATISFIED. ON SHEET LP-2 AND LP-3, HIBISCUS | | | SYRIACUS IS NOT VIABLE FOR THIS CLIMATE ZONE, IT IS | | | LIMITED TO ZONE 8. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 2/25/20: | | | 15. SATISFIED. STREET TREES ALONG OLIVE NEED TO BE | | | SPREAD OUT TOWARD CORNER AND DRIVEWAY TO COVER MORE OF | | | THE SIDEWALK. | | | | | | 16. SATISFIED. STREET TREES ALONG BANYAN NEED TO BE | | | SPREAD OUT TOWARD THE CORNER OF DIXIE, AND IN FRONT OF | | | THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. | | | | | | 17. SATISFIED. STREET TREE AND BIKE RACKS NEED TO BE | | | ADJUSTED TO PRIORITIZE THE TREE AND THEN ADD THE BIKE | | | RACKS. THE RACKS CAN BE SEPARATED. | | | | | | 18. SATISFIED. STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL NEEDS TO SHOW | | | UNDER HARD SURFACES, NOT UNDER TREES. PLANTING SOIL | | | DEPTH IS 36 INCHES AROUND TREE. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 4/3/20: | | | 19. ADDRESS LANDSCAPE COMMENTS INCLUDED IN ZONING | | | REVIEW COMMENTS. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. FINAL LOCATIONS | | | OF RELOCATED TREES AND PALMS WILL BE ESTABLISHED, AND | | | ANY MITIGATION RECALCULATED AT THE TIME OF PERMIT. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-25-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
02-25-2020 |
Time |
13:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
02-25-2020 |
Time |
13:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-25 13:15:53 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 303 BANYAN Z19080020 | | | FEBRUARY 25 22, 2020 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN: | | | ? SATISFIED. TREES AND PALMS CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE TO | | | BE MITIGATED BASED ON CATEGORY. ANY TREES 20 FEET OR | | | MORE CANOPY DIAMETER TO BE MITIGATED BY ACTUAL SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE. 1:1 MITIGATION IS EQUAL TO THE CATEGORY VALUE. | | | BLACK OLIVE CATEGORY 1 EQUALS 300 SQ FT, YELLOW TAB | | | CATEGORY 2 EQUALS 150 SQ FT. | | | ? SATISFIED. INCLUDE EXISTING STREET TREES TO BE | | | REMOVED AND REPLACED ON BANYAN AND OLIVE. | | | #2228, 2229, 2230, 2231, 2232, AND 2233 NEED TO BE | | | SHOWN AS REMOVED AND MITIGATION DUE ADDED. | | | ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE | | | OF MITIGATION FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE | | | REMOVED. | | | ADJUST AFTER CHANGES TO SITE LANDSCAPE AND STREET TREE | | | ADDITIONS. | | | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION VALUES BY CATEGORY | | | FOR THE PROPOSED TREES AND PALMS. | | | ADJUST AFTER CHANGES TO SITE LANDSCAPE AND STREET TREE | | | ADDITIONS. | | | | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE | | | TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR | | | RELOCATED. LIVE OAK TREES, THATCH PALM, AND SABAL PALMS | | | IN GOOD CONDITION CAN BE RELOCATED TO PUBLIC PROPERTY | | | IF THEY CANNOT BE USED ON SITE. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. THE STREETSCAPE CAN BE IMPROVED TO | | | ACCOMPLISH THE INTENT OF THE CODE SECTION 94-113. THE | | | PALMS MAY BE USED, BUT NOT AS COUNTING TOWARD THE TREE | | | REQUIREMENT AT THE MAXIMUM 30 FOOT SPACING. ADD CANOPY | | | TREES AS REQUIRED. TREE GRATES ARE NOT PREFERRED IF THE | | | SIDEWALK MEETS THE MINIMUM 8 FOOT WIDTH REQUIREMENT, | | | AND PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE USED INSTEAD. BANYAN | | | STREETSCAPE NEEDS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY | | | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. | | | STREET TREES NEED TO BE REPLACED ON BANYAN IN FRONT OF | | | THE EXISTING BUILDING, AND ON OLIVE AVE. ADJACENT TO | | | THE PROPERTY. PARKING SPACES NEE TO BE FINALIZED AS | | | PART OF THE DESIGN. IT WOULD BE BETTER TO SPREAD OUT | | | THE PARKING SPACES AND HAVE ALL TREES AT THE SAME | | | DISTANCE TO SHADE SIDEWALK. | | | | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. CALCULATIONS FOR STREET TREES NEED TO BE | | | CORRECTED. EXAMPLE- DIXIE FROM CURB AT BANYAN TO NORTH | | | PROPERTY LINE SCALES AS 160 FEET AND REQUIRES 6 TREES. | | | BANYAN SIDE MUST BE MEASURED FOR THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF | | | THE PROPERTY AND THE REQUIRED TREES RECALCULATED. OLIVE | | | SIDE MUST ALSO BE ADDED. EXISTING STREET TREES ARE TO | | | BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW TREES WITH STRUCTURAL | | | SOIL AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS SHOWN ON SHEETS | | | LP.3 AND LP.4 NEED TO BE LABELED AS THE SELECTED OPEN | | | SPACE TYPE AND FLOOR. ROOFTOP GARDEN IS ASSUMED, AS THE | | | REQUIREMENTS MATCH THIS OPEN SPACE TYPE. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. FUTURE SUBDIVISION LINE SHOWN DOES NOT | | | ALLOW FUTURE LOTS TO MEET THE 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER | | | REQUIREMENTS ADJACENT TO PARKING AREAS. | | | THE DISCUSSION WITH THE APPLICANT WAS TO REMOVE THE | | | LINE FROM THE PLANS. ANY SUBDIVISION PROPOSED IN THE | | | FUTURE MUST NOT CREATE A NONCONFORMITY WITH THE BUFFER | | | REQUIREMENT. IF THE PROPERTY IS APPROVED AS ONE SITE | | | PLAN AND A UNITY OF TITLE IS EXECUTED AS PART OF THE | | | SUBDIVISION, IT MAY BE POSSIBLE. | | | | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES ON | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN, ALSO LOCATIONS OF VALVES AND BACKFLOW | | | PREVENTERS AND FPL TRANSFORMERS. SCREENING MUST BE | | | PROVIDED. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF REQUIRED STRUCTURAL | | | SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE ADJACENT TO TREES. PROVIDE A | | | TYPICAL FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE STRUCTURAL SOIL AND | | | A SEPARATE PLAN SHOWING THE LOCATIONS. | | | ARE FOR STRUCTURAL SOIL AND PLANTING AREA SHOULD BE | | | APPROXIMATELY 14 FEET IN LENGTH AND 9 FEET IN WIDTH | | | RELATIVE TO THE BACK OF CURB SHOWN ON LP.1. STRUCTURAL | | | SOIL DETAIL IS TO SHOW THE CONSTRUCTION CROSS SECTION | | | FOR DEPTH OF 36 INCHES, AND PLANTING SOIL IN THE | | | PLANTING AREA ON SHEET LP.5. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. | | | PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT | | | MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF DROUGHT TOLERANT AND | | | NATIVE SPECIES ADDED BASED ON THE PROPOSED PLANT LIST. | | | | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. THE TERMINAL ISLAND AND REQUIRED TREE | | | NEED TO BE ADDED AT THE END OF THE ROW OF PARKING AT | | | THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY. | | | TERMINAL ISLAND TREES ARE MISSING FROM SEVERAL | | | LOCATIONS ADJACENT TO THE ROWS OF PARKING IN THE | | | SURFACE PARKING AREA. HEDGE MUST BE PROVIDED ALONG | | | STREET FRONTAGE. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 11/21/19: | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. DRAINAGE LINES AND DRAINS ARE IN | | | CONFLICT WITH THE TREE LOCATIONS FOR THE PUBLIC OPEN | | | SPACE. | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. FLORIDA FRIENDLY POINTS CANNOT BE | | | COUNTED TWICE IN THE SAME CATEGORY. EXAMPLE: IF TAKING | | | CREDIT FOR 51% NATIVE SHRUBS, CAN ONLY TAKE 25-50% FOR | | | DROUGHT TOLERANT SHRUBS. | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. CORRECT CANOPY AREA REQUIREMENTS FOR | | | OPEN SPACE ON SHEETS LP.2, LP.3 AND LP.4 TO READ ?TYPE? | | | INSTEAD OF ?CATEGORY?. | | | | | | 14. SATISFIED. ON SHEET LP-2 AND LP-3, HIBISCUS | | | SYRIACUS IS NOT VIABLE FOR THIS CLIMATE ZONE, IT IS | | | LIMITED TO ZONE 8. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 2/25/20: | | | 15. STREET TREES ALONG OLIVE NEED TO BE SPREAD OUT | | | TOWARD CORNER AND DRIVEWAY TO COVER MORE OF THE | | | SIDEWALK. | | | | | | 16. STREET TREES ALONG BANYAN NEED TO BE SPREAD OUT | | | TOWARD THE CORNER OF DIXIE, AND IN FRONT OF THE PUBLIC | | | OPEN SPACE. | | | | | | 17. STREET TREE AND BIKE RACKS NEED TO BE ADJUSTED TO | | | PRIORITIZE THE TREE AND THEN ADD THE BIKE RACKS. THE | | | RACKS CAN BE SEPARATED. | | | | | | 18. STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL NEEDS TO SHOW UNDER HARD | | | SURFACES, NOT UNDER TREES. PLANTING SOIL DEPTH IS 36 | | | INCHES AROUND TREE. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-22-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
11-22-2019 |
Time |
12:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
11-22-2019 |
Time |
12:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-11-22 12:10:18 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 303 BANYAN Z19080020 | | | NOVEMBER 22, 2019 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN: | | | ? SATISFIED. TREES AND PALMS CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE TO | | | BE MITIGATED BASED ON CATEGORY. ANY TREES 20 FEET OR | | | MORE CANOPY DIAMETER TO BE MITIGATED BY ACTUAL SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE. 1:1 MITIGATION IS EQUAL TO THE CATEGORY VALUE. | | | BLACK OLIVE CATEGORY 1 EQUALS 300 SQ FT, YELLOW TAB | | | CATEGORY 2 EQUALS 150 SQ FT. | | | ? NOT SATISFIED. INCLUDE EXISTING STREET TREES TO BE | | | REMOVED AND REPLACED ON BANYAN AND OLIVE. | | | #2228, 2229, 2230, 2231, 2232, AND 2233 NEED TO BE | | | SHOWN AS REMOVED AND MITIGATION DUE ADDED. | | | ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE | | | OF MITIGATION FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE | | | REMOVED. | | | ADJUST AFTER CHANGES TO SITE LANDSCAPE AND STREET TREE | | | ADDITIONS. | | | ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION VALUES BY | | | CATEGORY FOR THE PROPOSED TREES AND PALMS. | | | ADJUST AFTER CHANGES TO SITE LANDSCAPE AND STREET TREE | | | ADDITIONS. | | | | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE | | | TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR | | | RELOCATED. LIVE OAK TREES, THATCH PALM, AND SABAL PALMS | | | IN GOOD CONDITION CAN BE RELOCATED TO PUBLIC PROPERTY | | | IF THEY CANNOT BE USED ON SITE. | | | | | | 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE STREETSCAPE CAN BE IMPROVED | | | TO ACCOMPLISH THE INTENT OF THE CODE SECTION 94-113. | | | THE PALMS MAY BE USED, BUT NOT AS COUNTING TOWARD THE | | | TREE REQUIREMENT AT THE MAXIMUM 30 FOOT SPACING. ADD | | | CANOPY TREES AS REQUIRED. TREE GRATES ARE NOT PREFERRED | | | IF THE SIDEWALK MEETS THE MINIMUM 8 FOOT WIDTH | | | REQUIREMENT, AND PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE USED INSTEAD. | | | BANYAN STREETSCAPE NEEDS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE | | | CITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. | | | STREET TREES NEED TO BE REPLACED ON BANYAN IN FRONT OF | | | THE EXISTING BUILDING, AND ON OLIVE AVE. ADJACENT TO | | | THE PROPERTY. PARKING SPACES NEE TO BE FINALIZED AS | | | PART OF THE DESIGN. IT WOULD BE BETTER TO SPREAD OUT | | | THE PARKING SPACES AND HAVE ALL TREES AT THE SAME | | | DISTANCE TO SHADE SIDEWALK. | | | | | | | | | 4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. CALCULATIONS FOR STREET TREES | | | NEED TO BE CORRECTED. EXAMPLE- DIXIE FROM CURB AT | | | BANYAN TO NORTH PROPERTY LINE SCALES AS 160 FEET AND | | | REQUIRES 6 TREES. BANYAN SIDE MUST BE MEASURED FOR THE | | | ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE PROPERTY AND THE REQUIRED TREES | | | RECALCULATED. OLIVE SIDE MUST ALSO BE ADDED. EXISTING | | | STREET TREES ARE TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW | | | TREES WITH STRUCTURAL SOIL AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS SHOWN ON SHEETS | | | LP.3 AND LP.4 NEED TO BE LABELED AS THE SELECTED OPEN | | | SPACE TYPE AND FLOOR. ROOFTOP GARDEN IS ASSUMED, AS THE | | | REQUIREMENTS MATCH THIS OPEN SPACE TYPE. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. FUTURE SUBDIVISION LINE SHOWN DOES NOT | | | ALLOW FUTURE LOTS TO MEET THE 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER | | | REQUIREMENTS ADJACENT TO PARKING AREAS. | | | THE DISCUSSION WITH THE APPLICANT WAS TO REMOVE THE | | | LINE FROM THE PLANS. ANY SUBDIVISION PROPOSED IN THE | | | FUTURE MUST NOT CREATE A NONCONFORMITY WITH THE BUFFER | | | REQUIREMENT. IF THE PROPERTY IS APPROVED AS ONE SITE | | | PLAN AND A UNITY OF TITLE IS EXECUTED AS PART OF THE | | | SUBDIVISION, IT MAY BE POSSIBLE. | | | | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES ON | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN, ALSO LOCATIONS OF VALVES AND BACKFLOW | | | PREVENTERS AND FPL TRANSFORMERS. SCREENING MUST BE | | | PROVIDED. | | | | | | 8. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF REQUIRED | | | STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE ADJACENT TO TREES. | | | PROVIDE A TYPICAL FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STRUCTURAL SOIL AND A SEPARATE PLAN SHOWING THE | | | LOCATIONS. | | | ARE FOR STRUCTURAL SOIL AND PLANTING AREA SHOULD BE | | | APPROXIMATELY 14 FEET IN LENGTH AND 9 FEET IN WIDTH | | | RELATIVE TO THE BACK OF CURB SHOWN ON LP.1. STRUCTURAL | | | SOIL DETAIL IS TO SHOW THE CONSTRUCTION CROSS SECTION | | | FOR DEPTH OF 36 INCHES, AND PLANTING SOIL IN THE | | | PLANTING AREA ON SHEET LP.5. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. | | | PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT | | | MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF DROUGHT TOLERANT AND | | | NATIVE SPECIES ADDED BASED ON THE PROPOSED PLANT LIST. | | | | | | | | | 10. NOT SATISFIED. THE TERMINAL ISLAND AND REQUIRED | | | TREE NEED TO BE ADDED AT THE END OF THE ROW OF PARKING | | | AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY. | | | TERMINAL ISLAND TREES ARE MISSING FROM SEVERAL | | | LOCATIONS ADJACENT TO THE ROWS OF PARKING IN THE | | | SURFACE PARKING AREA. HEDGE MUST BE PROVIDED ALONG | | | STREET FRONTAGE. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 11/21/19: | | | | | | 11. DRAINAGE LINES AND DRAINS ARE IN CONFLICT WITH THE | | | TREE LOCATIONS FOR THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. | | | | | | 12. FLORIDA FRIENDLY POINTS CANNOT BE COUNTED TWICE IN | | | THE SAME CATEGORY. EXAMPLE: IF TAKING CREDIT FOR 51% | | | NATIVE SHRUBS, CAN ONLY TAKE 25-50% FOR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SHRUBS. | | | | | | 13. CORRECT CANOPY AREA REQUIREMENTS FOR OPEN SPACE ON | | | SHEETS LP.2, LP.3 AND LP.4 TO READ ?TYPE? INSTEAD OF | | | ?CATEGORY?. | | | | | | 14. ON SHEET LP-2 AND LP-3, HIBISCUS SYRIACUS IS NOT | | | VIABLE FOR THIS CLIMATE ZONE, IT IS LIMITED TO ZONE 8. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-09-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-09-2019 |
Time |
17:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-09-2019 |
Time |
17:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-09-09 17:18:43 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 303 BANYAN Z19080020 | | | SEPTEMBER 9, 2019 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN: | | | ? TREES AND PALMS CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE TO BE MITIGATED | | | BASED ON CATEGORY. ANY TREES 20 FEET OR MORE CANOPY | | | DIAMETER TO BE MITIGATED BY ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE. 1:1 | | | MITIGATION IS EQUAL TO THE CATEGORY VALUE. BLACK OLIVE | | | CATEGORY 1 EQUALS 300 SQ FT, YELLOW TAB CATEGORY 2 | | | EQUALS 150 SQ FT. | | | ? INCLUDE EXISTING STREET TREES TO BE REMOVED AND | | | REPLACED ON BANYAN AND OLIVE. | | | ? PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF MITIGATION FOR | | | ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED. | | | ? PROVIDE THE MITIGATION VALUES BY CATEGORY FOR THE | | | PROPOSED TREES AND PALMS. | | | | | | 2. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES IN GOOD | | | CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. LIVE | | | OAK TREES, THATCH PALM, AND SABAL PALMS IN GOOD | | | CONDITION CAN BE RELOCATED TO PUBLIC PROPERTY IF THEY | | | CANNOT BE USED ON SITE. | | | | | | 3. THE STREETSCAPE CAN BE IMPROVED TO ACCOMPLISH THE | | | INTENT OF THE CODE SECTION 94-113. THE PALMS MAY BE | | | USED, BUT NOT AS COUNTING TOWARD THE TREE REQUIREMENT | | | AT THE MAXIMUM 30 FOOT SPACING. ADD CANOPY TREES AS | | | REQUIRED. TREE GRATES ARE NOT PREFERRED IF THE SIDEWALK | | | MEETS THE MINIMUM 8 FOOT WIDTH REQUIREMENT, AND | | | PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE USED INSTEAD. BANYAN | | | STREETSCAPE NEEDS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY | | | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. | | | | | | 4. CALCULATIONS FOR STREET TREES NEED TO BE CORRECTED. | | | EXAMPLE- DIXIE FROM CURB AT BANYAN TO NORTH PROPERTY | | | LINE SCALES AS 160 FEET AND REQUIRES 6 TREES. BANYAN | | | SIDE MUST BE MEASURED FOR THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE | | | PROPERTY AND THE REQUIRED TREES RECALCULATED. OLIVE | | | SIDE MUST ALSO BE ADDED. EXISTING STREET TREES ARE TO | | | BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW TREES WITH STRUCTURAL | | | SOIL AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 5. PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS SHOWN ON SHEETS LP.3 AND | | | LP.4 NEED TO BE LABELED AS THE SELECTED OPEN SPACE TYPE | | | AND FLOOR. ROOFTOP GARDEN IS ASSUMED, AS THE | | | REQUIREMENTS MATCH THIS OPEN SPACE TYPE. | | | | | | 6. FUTURE SUBDIVISION LINE SHOWN DOES NOT ALLOW FUTURE | | | LOTS TO MEET THE 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS | | | ADJACENT TO PARKING AREAS. | | | | | | | | | 7. SHOW LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, | | | ALSO LOCATIONS OF VALVES AND BACKFLOW PREVENTERS AND | | | FPL TRANSFORMERS. SCREENING MUST BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 8. SHOW LOCATIONS OF REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER | | | HARDSCAPE ADJACENT TO TREES. PROVIDE A TYPICAL FOR THE | | | INSTALLATION OF THE STRUCTURAL SOIL AND A SEPARATE PLAN | | | SHOWING THE LOCATIONS. | | | | | | 9. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT | | | SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL | | | ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT | | | SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF | | | SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA | | | WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA | | | LANDSCAPES. | | | PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF DROUGHT TOLERANT AND | | | NATIVE SPECIES ADDED BASED ON THE PROPOSED PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 10. THE TERMINAL ISLAND AND REQUIRED TREE NEED TO BE | | | ADDED AT THE END OF THE ROW OF PARKING AT THE NORTHEAST | | | CORNER OF THE PROPERTY. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-29-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
06-29-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
06-29-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-06-29 11:09:02 | NO FURTHER COMMENTS. | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | 822-2045 / [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-25-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
11-25-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-11-25 16:04:35 | PLEASE PROVIDE THE DETAILED ENCLOSURE SPEC. | | | THE ENCLOSURE GATES SHOULD ALSO BE OPENED ALL THE WAY | | | (I.E. 180 DEG.) AND SECURED WITH THE PIN HOLES AS | | | INDICAED IN OUR ENCLOSURE SPEC. | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | 822-2045 / [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-09-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
09-09-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
09-09-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-09-09 12:58:57 | PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS: | | | - LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID | | | WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE OF THE | | | DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR THAT WILL BE UTILIZED. | | | - FOR A FREESTANDING SITE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, THE | | | ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST REVISION OF CITY | | | OF WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE | | | ENCLOSURE STANDARD, CG-8. | | | - AUTO TURN FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE | | | - CONTINGENCY PLAN, FOR WHEN THE COMPACTOR IS OUT OF | | | SERVICE (I.E. CITY DUMPSTER, ROLL-OFF CONTAINER) | | | - DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP. | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-21-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
05-21-2020 |
Time |
10:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
05-21-2020 |
Time |
10:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-05-21 10:56:16 | COMMENTS FOR MAY 1, 2020 REVIEW SUBMITTAL PACKAGE: | | | | | | SEE THE COMMENTS POSTED FOR STORM REVIEW STOP #2, TO BE | | | ADDRESSED DURING ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
03-24-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
03-24-2020 |
Time |
09:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
03-24-2020 |
Time |
09:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-03-24 09:31:04 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE MARCH | | | 17, 2020 REVIEW SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. THESE COMMENTS CAN | | | BE ADDRESSED DURING THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 1. CONFIRM THE SIZE OF THE EXISTING STORMWATER PIPE IN | | | BANYAN BLVD BETWEEN N. DIXIE HIGHWAY AND THE MANHOLE IN | | | FRONT OF THE BANK DRIVE-THROUGH TELLER LANES IS 48" OR | | | 42". CONTACT JANICE TARBILL IN THE ENGINEERING SERVICES | | | DEPARTMENT FOR AS-BUILT PLANS. | | | | | | 2. ON THE DEMOLITION PLAN SHEET, SHOW THE REMOVAL OF | | | THE EASTERN PARKING SPACE NEAR THE DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE TO | | | N. OLIVE AVE. | | | | | | 3. SHEET 9 OF 10 CALLS OUT A NON-STANDARD STORMWATER | | | PIPE SIZE (16") IN THE CONFLICT NOTE WITH THE WATER | | | MAIN ON N. DIXIE HIGHWAY. | | | | | | 4. SHOW SILT FENCE AT THE PROPERTY LINE/BACK OF | | | SIDEWALK OR CURB ON THE POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN. THE | | | SILT FENCE WILL BE NEEDED DURING DEMOLITION AND UNTIL | | | THE BUILDING WALLS AND SIDEWALKS ARE COMPLETED. | | | | | | 5. CALL OUT THE HIGH POINT IN THE DRIVE AISLE/DRIVEWAY | | | TO BANYAN BLVD AND HAVE IT AS CLOSE TO THE BACK OF | | | SIDEWALK AS POSSIBLE. | | | | | | 6. CONFIRM THE DRAINAGE INLETS IN THE DRIVE AISLE WILL | | | BE CONCRETE STRUCTURES (TYPE 'E') AND NOT YARD DRAINS | | | AS LABELED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 7. COORDINATE THE LOCATION OF THE YARD DRAIN IN THE | | | PUBLIC OPEN SPACE WITH THE PLACEMENT OF LANDSCAPING AND | | | SCULPTURES. THE GARDEN COURTYARD LANDSCAPE PLAN (SHEET | | | LP.2) SHOWS THE PLACEMENT OF A SCULPTURE ON TOP OF THE | | | YARD DRAIN. | | | | | | 8. THE AREA BETWEEN THE BUILDING AND THE NORTH PROPERTY | | | LINE WILL NEED GROUND COVER AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION | | | TO PREVENT EROSION AND SEDIMENT MIGRATION OFFSITE. | | | | | | 9. PROVIDE PROFILE OF STORM PIPE BETWEEN STORMCEPTOR | | | AND PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE IN BANYAN BLVD. SHOWING ALL | | | OF THE UTILITIES CROSSING THE PROPOSED STORM PIPE. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-11-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
09-11-2019 |
Time |
12:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
09-11-2019 |
Time |
12:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-09-11 12:16:05 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | | | APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT | | | | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR | | | MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | 1. WHERE DOES THE EXISTING CURB INLET ON THE EASTERN | | | PART OF BANYAN BLVD ON SHEET 1 OF 2 DRAIN TO? | | | | | | 2. WHERE DOES THE EXISTING CATCH BASIN ON N. OLIVE AVE. | | | TO THE NORTHEAST OF THE NEW CWPB SANITARY MANHOLE DRAIN | | | TO? | | | | | | 3. SHOW LIMITS OF MILLING AND RESURFACING ON THE | | | STREETS. | | | | | | 4. PROVIDE CCTV OF THE EXISTING STORM PIPE ON BANYAN | | | BLVD. AND OF THE STORM SYSTEM ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF N. | | | DIXIE HWY. | | | | | | 5. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FOR N. DIXIE HWY AND BANYAN | | | BLVD. FROM FACE OF BUILDING TO ROAD CENTERLINE. | | | | | | 6. PROVIDE CROSS SECTION FROM EAST SIDE OF BUILDING TO | | | THE FIRST BANK DRIVE THROUGH LANE ON THE EAST SIDE OF | | | THE PROPOSED 1.5' CONCRETE DIVIDER ISLAND. | | | | | | 7. PROPOSED 18" YELLOW STRIPING MAY NOT BE APPROPRIATE | | | ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF TRAVEL LANES (DRIVEWAY | | | ENTRANCE/EXIT). | | | | | | 8. PROVIDE PROFILE OF STORM PIPE BETWEEN STORMCEPTOR | | | AND STORM MANHOLE IN BANYAN BLVD. SHOWING ALL OF THE | | | UTILITIES CROSSING THE PROPOSED STORM PIPE. | | | | | | 9. INDICATE HOW THE PROPOSED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE WILL | | | DRAIN. | | | | | | 10. ADD THE NAVD88 TO NGVD29 CONVERSION TO THE SURVEY. | | | | | | 11. THE SURVEY SHOWS EXISTING CATCH BASINS THAT ARE NOT | | | CALLED OUT ON THE CONCEPTUAL PAVING AND DRAINAGE PLAN | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE | | | ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED | | | WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP PRIOR TO STARTING | | | CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-15-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
05-15-2020 |
Time |
07:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-05-15 07:53:08 | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. REPLAT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT PRIOR TO T.C.O. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-12-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
02-12-2020 |
Time |
09:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-12 09:38:35 | 1. PROVIDE RESPONSE TO 9/10/2019 COMMENTS. | | | 2. IT APPEARS THAT SOME ITEMS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | 3. REPLAT AND DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT REQUIRED PRIOR TO | | | C.O. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-10-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
09-10-2019 |
Time |
09:05 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-09-10 09:15:45 | 1. PROPERTY WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE REPLATTED. | | | 2. ADD CONVERSION TO NGVD-29 TO ALL PLANS. | | | 3. NEED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON SOUTH SIDE OF BANYAN | | | BLVD. | | | 4. ENGINEERING PLANS TOO CONGESTED. | | | 5. UTILITIES MAY NOT WANT TO ACCEPT NEW WATER LINE INTO | | | PROJECT. | | | 6. TURN-AROUND NEEDED AT NORTH END OF DRIVEWAY FROM | | | BANYAN. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-22-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
06-30-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
04-01-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-04-01 11:40:45 | 1. THE TRAFFIC STUDY DOES NOT MENTION TRANSPORTATION | | | DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) STRATEGIES WITH RESPECT TO THE | | | MICRO-UNITS. PLEASE REVISE. | | | 2. RESTRICT OUTBOUND MOVEMENT FROM THE DRIVEWAY ON | | | DIXIE HIGHWAY TO RIGHT-TURN ONLY DURING WEEKDAY AM AND | | | PM PEAK PERIODS. | | | | | | CONDITIONS: | | | 1. PROVIDE TDM STRATEGIES TO MEET THE CITY'S TARGET | | | MODE SHIFT OF 25% AND THE REQUIRED MICRO-UNITS | | | STRATEGIES PER CITY CODE 94-106(A)(8.A) INCLUDING BUT | | | NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: | | | A. UNBUNDLE PARKING SPACES FROM THE RENTAL LEASE | | | B. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED CAR-SHARING STATIONS ON-SITE | | | C. PROVIDE MICROMOBILITY STATION IN LIEU OF THE | | | REQUIRED BIKE SHARING STATION | | | D. CONTRIBUTE THE REQUIRED FUNDING TO THE CITY'S | | | TRANSIT OPERATIONS FUND | | | 2. PROVIDE YEARLY STATISTICS OF TDM UTILIZATION SUMMARY | | | TO THE CITY | | | 3. RESERVE 8 PARKING SPACES ON THE SURFACE PARKING LOT | | | FOR PUBLIC METERED PARKING | | | | | | | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] | | | (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
02-18-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-18 09:30:40 | PASSED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) | | | STRATEGIES TO MEET THE CITY?S TARGET MODE SHIFT OF 25% | | | INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING AND THE | | | REQUIRED STRATEGIES PER CITY CODE 94-109(A)(8.A), AND | | | PROVIDE YEARLY STATISTICS OF TDM UTILIZATION SUMMARY TO | | | THE CITY: | | | A. UNBUNDLE PARKING SPACES FROM THE RENTAL LEASE | | | B. PROVIDE THE REQUIRED CAR-SHARING STATIONS ON-SITE | | | C. PROVIDE MICROMOBILITY STATION IN LIEU OF THE | | | REQUIRED BIKE SHARING STATION | | | D. CONTRIBUTE THE REQUIRED FUNDING TO CITY?S TRANSIT | | | OPERATIONS FUND | | | | | | | | | | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] | | | (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
11-26-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-11-26 15:58:39 | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | 1. INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE GATE IF THE PARKING | | | GARAGE WILL BE GATED. | | | 2. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF BICYCLE PARKING IN | | | THE PARKING GARAGE. SECURE BICYCLE PARKING SHOULD BE | | | PROVIDED PER CITY CODE 94-111 FOR BOTH THE RESIDENTIAL | | | AND COMMERCIAL COMPONENTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT. | | | 3. PROVIDE AUTOTURN PATHS FOR PASSENGER CARS TURNING | | | FROM THE DRIVEWAY ON BANYAN BOULEVARD ONTO THE | | | DRIVE-THROUGH LANES. | | | 4. PROVIDE SIGNAGE AT THE PARKING TERMINAL ISLAND NEAR | | | THE DUMPSTER TO INDICATE THAT THE AISLE BEYOND THAT | | | POINT IS FOR DRIVE-THROUGH ONLY AND IS NOT AN EXIT. | | | 5. DEDICATE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE CITY AT THE CORNER OF | | | BANYAN BOULEVARD AND DIXIE HIGHWAY. | | | 6. PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SIDEWALK EASEMENT TO ALLOW AT | | | LEAST 8-FOOT MINIMUM WALKING PATH FROM THE BACK OF THE | | | TREE PIT. AT THE EXISTING BUILDING, PROVIDE SIDEWALK | | | EASEMENT UP TO THE FACE OF THE BUILDING. | | | 7. RELOCATE THE BIKE RACK NEAR THE RESIDENTIAL LOBBY TO | | | THE BULB OUT BY THE CURB-SIDE NEAR THE OPEN SPACE. | | | 8. INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE EXISTING BUS STOP ON | | | BANYAN, WHICH SHOULD MEET ADA REQUIREMENTS. THE CITY | | | TROLLEY WILL OPERATE ON DIXIE HIGHWAY SO A BUS SHELTER | | | ON BANYAN IS NOT REQUIRED. | | | 9. PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) | | | STRATEGIES TO MEET THE CITY?S TARGET MODE SHIFT OF 25%, | | | INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWINGS: | | | A. UNBUNDLE PARKING SPACES FROM THE RENTAL LEASE | | | B. PROVIDE TRANSIT PASS SUBSIDY | | | C. PROVIDE SHARED MOBILITY SUBSIDY | | | D. PROVIDING MICROMOBILITY FACILITY OR SCOOTER PARKING | | | RACK ON-SITE | | | E. CONTRIBUTE FUNDING TO CITY TROLLEY | | | | | | | | | | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] | | | (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
09-09-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-09-09 15:11:07 | TRAFFIC STUDY COMMENTS: | | | 1. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER. | | | 2. PROVIDE INTERSECTION ANALYSIS AT BANYAN | | | BOULEVARD/SITE DRIVEWAY AND DIXIE HIGHWAY/SITE | | | DRIVEWAY. | | | 3. AT DIXIE HIGHWAY/BANYAN BOULEVARD, ASSUME NO | | | EXCLUSIVE WESTBOUND LEFT-TURN LANE TO BE CONSISTENT | | | WITH THE BANYAN BOULEVARD CORRIDOR DESIGN. | | | 4. THE TITLE OF THE PAGE FOR TABLES 1, 2 AND 3 SHOULD | | | BE "EXISTING DEVELOPMENT". | | | | | | | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | 5. CLARIFY THE CALCULATION OF REQUIRED VEHICULAR | | | PARKING SPACES FOR THE EXISTING DRIVE-IN BANK AND | | | OFFICE. | | | 6. INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE GATE IF THE PARKING | | | GARAGE WILL BE GATED. | | | 7. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF BICYCLE PARKING IN | | | THE PARKING GARAGE. SECURE BICYCLE PARKING SHOULD BE | | | PROVIDED PER CITY CODE 94-111 FOR BOTH THE RESIDENTIAL | | | AND COMMERCIAL COMPONENTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT. | | | ADDITIONAL BICYCLE PARKING FOR PUBLIC USE SHOULD BE | | | PROVIDED PER CITY CODE 94-113 AND SHOULD BE DISTRIBUTED | | | ALONG THE SITE FRONTAGE. | | | 8. CONSIDER PROVIDING MICROMOBILITY FACILITY OR SCOOTER | | | PARKING RACK ON-SITE. | | | 9. PROVIDE TERMINAL ISLAND FOR THE ROW OF ANGLED | | | PARKING SPACES IMMEDIATELY WEST OF OLIVE AVENUE SUCH | | | THAT VEHICLES BACKING OUT FROM THE FIRST ANGLED PARKING | | | SPACE WOULD NOT ENCROACH THE SIDEWALK. | | | 10. CURB CUTS AND DRIVEWAYS SHOULD NOT BE WIDER THAN 25 | | | FEET PER CITY CODE 94-111. | | | 11. REDUCE THE DRIVEWAY WIDTH ON OLIVE AVENUE TO 12 | | | FEET. | | | 12. THE CURB CUT ON BANYAN BOULEVARD WITH THE INGRESS | | | MOVEMENT BETWEEN THE TWO EGRESS MOVEMENTS COULD VIOLATE | | | DRIVERS? EXPECTATION AND RESULT IN INCREASED CONFLICTS. | | | PLEASE CONSIDER ALTERNATE DESIGN OR RELOCATE THE | | | PROPOSED SITE DRIVEWAY. | | | 13. DRIVEWAYS SHOULD MAINTAIN THE SIDEWALK ELEVATION. | | | THE SIDEWALK CROSSINGS ACROSS DRIVEWAYS SHOULD MAINTAIN | | | THE SAME WIDTH AS THE SIDEWALK, BUT SHOULD BE NO LESS | | | THAN 5 FEET IF CONSTRAINED AT THE CROSSINGS. | | | 14. SHOW CURB CUTS AND DRIVEWAYS ON OPPOSITE SIDE OF | | | THE STREETS ALONG THE SITE FRONTAGE. | | | 15. SHOW FULL RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH. | | | 16. COORDINATE WITH ENGINEERING ON THE BANYAN BOULEVARD | | | CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT AND THE REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS ON | | | BANYAN BOULEVARD. REFERENCE IN THE BANYAN BOULEVARD | | | CORRIDOR DESIGN IN THE SITE PLAN AND PROVIDE ON-STREET | | | PARKING (METERED BY THE CITY) ON BANYAN BOULEVARD. | | | 17. REPAVE OLIVE AVENUE ALONG THE SITE FRONTAGE. | | | 18. COORDINATE WITH PALM TRAN AND PROVIDE BUS SHELTER | | | FOR THE EXISTING BUS STOP ON THE SITE FRONTAGE. | | | 19. PROVIDE AUTOTURN PATHS FOR DELIVERY AND GARBAGE | | | TRUCKS. | | | 20. PROVIDE EASEMENT FOR THE PORTION OF SIDEWALK | | | OUTSIDE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | 21. CONSIDER PROVIDING THE FOLLOWING TRANSPORTATION | | | DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) STRATEGIES: | | | A. UNBUNDLE PARKING SPACES FROM THE RENTAL LEASE | | | B. PROVIDE TRANSIT PASS SUBSIDY | | | C. PROVIDE SHARED MOBILITY SUBSIDY | | | | | | | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] | | | (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS) | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-10-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
07-10-2020 |
Time |
11:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
07-10-2020 |
Time |
11:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-07-10 11:01:03 | 1. PLEASE ADJUST THE TOTAL NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL GBA IN | | | THE SITE PLAN TO MATCH THE GBA CALCULATIONS IN THE | | | ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. SITE PLAN LISTS 223,906 SF VS | | | 223,914 SF RESULTING AS THE TOTAL FOR THE GBA REFLECTED | | | IN SHEET Z1 AND Z2. PLEASE ALSO INCLUDE A LINE WITH THE | | | AMOUNT OF TDRS TRANSFER TO THE SITE, AND IDENTIFY THE | | | DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY ALLOWED AS BY RIGHT=2.75FAR AND | | | TDR INCENTIVE=1.0FAR. | | | 2. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE INCREASE IN GBA DUE TO THE | | | INCREASE IN THE SIZE OF THE END UNIT NEXT TO THE PUBLIC | | | OPEN SPACE, AND ADJUSTMENT ON UNIT AT NW CORNER OF | | | BUILDING. IT SEEMS THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE | | | GBA NUMBERS SUBMITTED IN THE PREVIOUS SUBMITTAL AND NEW | | | NUMBERS. FOR EXAMPLE, GBA FOR 5TH FLOOR IN 4/14/20 | | | VERSION IS 9,101SF AND IN 6/21/20 VERSION IS 9,026SF | | | WHEN THE ONLY LISTED CHANGE IS AN INCREASE IN THE | | | CORNER UNIT. PLEASE EXPLAIN AND RECALCULATE IF NEEDED. | | | 3. IT SEEMS THE ROOF STAIR NO 1 WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE | | | CALCULATION FOR THE GBA IN THAT ROOF TERRACE. PLEASE | | | CORRECT. | | | 4. PLEASE RENAME FLOOR PLANS LISTED AS 6TH TO 16TH | | | FLOOR TO 6TH TO 15TH FLOOR AS THE BUILDING ONLY HAS | | | 15TH FLOORS. | | | 5. ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT IS NEEDED ON THE | | | NW WALL TO SATISFY DAC COMMENTS. OPTIONS MAY INCLUDE | | | SPANDREL WINDOWS. | | | 6. WHEN PARKING SPACES ARE ADJACENT TO A COLUMN OR WALL | | | THE MINIMUM WITH OF THE SPACE SHALL BE WIDENED TO 9?6?. | | | SEE SECTION 94-111(C) | | | 7. AMENITY DECK LEVEL GREEN SCREEN LOCATED ON THE EAST | | | SIDE OF DECK CANNOT BE ARTIFICIAL PLANT MATERIAL. | | | 8. SECTIONS SHOWN IN SHEET 6 OF CIVIL DRAWINGS INDICATE | | | A PAVER BRICK AREA NEXT TO CURB OR LANDSCAPE. HARDSCAPE | | | DOES NOT INDICATE ANY PAVER AREA. PLEASE CORRECT. | | | 9. PLEASE CONFIRM ALL THE GROUND FLOOR ACCESS DOORS | | | WILL MEET THE SIDEWALK GRADE ELEVATION, AND PROPOSED | | | SIDEWALK MEETS THE MAXIMUM 2% CROSS SLOPE. | | | 10. SHEET A1 INDICATES THE LOCATION OF THE BIKE RACKS | | | ALONG BANYAN WITHIN A PLANTING AREA. PLEASE ADJUST. | | | 11. LANDSCAPE MATERIAL PROPOSED AT THE NW CORNER OF THE | | | AMENITY DECK WAS REMOVED. PLEASE INCLUDE THAT LANDSCAPE | | | BACK INTO THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE. IF THE AREA IS NO | | | LONGER USED AS AN AMENITY, THE PERIMETER LANDSCAPE | | | PLANTERS SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO SCREEN PROPOSED | | | MECHANICAL AREA AND ENHANCE THE VIEWS FROM UPPER LEVELS | | | AND GROUND LEVELS. | | | 12. PLEASE CORRECT THE STREET LIGHTING SPEC TO REFLECT | | | THE CITY STANDARD FOR FIXTURE AND POLE. | | | FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA | | | APONTE AT 561-822-1439. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-06-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
04-06-2020 |
Time |
08:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
04-06-2020 |
Time |
08:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-04-06 08:53:04 | COMMENTS PROVIDED FOR THE 3-10-2020 RESUBMITTAL | | | 1. THE NW CORNER FA?ADE NEEDS ADDITIONAL DESIGN WORK. | | | THE NORTH ELEVATION OF THE TOWER IS ABSENT OF ANY | | | FENESTRATION, AND THIS FA?ADE WILL BE HIGHLY VISIBLE | | | FROM DIXIE HIGHWAY. | | | 2. THE GROUND FLOOR NORTH ELEVATION (VISIBLE FROM THE | | | NORTH) COULD BE ENHANCED WITH ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL | | | TREATMENT, POSSIBLY SOME OPENINGS AND LANDSCAPE. THE | | | UPPER FLOORS ALSO NEED ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT TO | | | SCREEN THE GARAGE (UP TO THE POINT WHERE THE COUNTY | | | GARAGE STARTS). LANDSCAPE AT THE GROUND FLOOR NEEDS TO | | | BE ADDED TO HELP WITH THE SCREENING. THE LA DRAWINGS DO | | | NOT SHOW ANYTHING ON THAT AREA. | | | 3. PLEASE CLARIFY THE DETAILS OF THE BANYAN AND DIXIE | | | BUILDING CORNER AT GROUND FLOOR. RENDER IN Z.3 AND | | | ELEVATIONS SHOW A SOLID ELEMENT FRAMING THE DOORS ON | | | BOTH SIDES, BUT FLOOR PLAN JUST INDICATES GLAZING. THE | | | CORNER COLUMN/WINDOW FRAME IS ALSO SHOWN WITH A LARGER | | | PROFILE THAN THE ONE INDICATED IN THE FLOOR PLAN. | | | 4. THE PORTION OF THE WEST FA?ADE WHERE THE STAIR IS | | | NEEDS ADDITIONAL TREATMENT. | | | 5. PLEASE DIMENSION THE CANOPY PROJECTIONS FOR THE | | | ENTIRE PROJECT, AND SPECIFY MATERIAL (SOME ERRORS ON | | | CALL OUTS) | | | 6. PLEASE LOCATE ANY PORTION OF THE DCDA AND RPBA THAT | | | PROJECT ABOVE GROUND BEHIND THE BUILDING FA?ADE. IF | | | POSSIBLE, PROVIDE SPACE FOR LANDSCAPE SCREENING ALONG | | | THE FRONTAGE. | | | 7. PLEASE DISCUSS WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT IF THE FIRE | | | DEPT COMMAND ROOM CAN BE RELOCATED TO THE EAST SIDE OF | | | THE GARAGE, WITH ACCESS FROM THE SURFACE PARKING LOT. | | | THE RELOCATION OF THE FIRE COMMAND ROOM WILL ALLOW | | | APPLICANT TO INCREASE THE GROUND FLOOR ACTIVE USE AND | | | REDUCE THE VARIANCE REQUEST. | | | 9. THE RENDERINGS SHOW THAT THE EAST ELEVATION OF THE | | | GARAGE HAS A GREEN WALL GROWING FROM THE STRIP OF | | | LANDSCAPE EAST OF THE WALL, BUT THE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS | | | DO NOT HAVE ANY PLANT MATERIAL SPECIFIED THERE. PLEASE | | | ADJUST THE LA DRAWINGS TO REFLECT THE APPROPRIATE | | | PLANTS TO CREATE THE GREEN WALL. A GREEN WALL IS A GOOD | | | SCREENING ENHANCEMENT FOR THE GARAGE. | | | 10. THE SAME EAST GARAGE RENDERING SHOWS A VINE GROWING | | | DOWN FROM THE POOL DECK TO SCREEN THE GARAGE, WHICH | | | COULD BE A GOOD ADDITION. HOWEVER, THE SPECIFIED PLANT | | | MATERIAL AT THE POOL DECK IS A CLUSIA GUTTIFERA WHICH | | | IS A HEDGE TYPE PLANT. PLEASE CHANGE TO REFLECT A VINE | | | TYPE OF PLANT. | | | 11. FOR THE PROPOSED GARAGE SCREENING WE NEED THE | | | FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: | | | O PLEASE PROVIDE A PLAN VIEW DETAIL OF THE GARAGE | | | SCREEN TO INDICATE THE DEPTH VARIATION BETWEEN THE | | | PANELS. | | | O METAL SLAT PANEL DEPTH IS NOT ENOUGH TO CREATE ANY | | | SHADOW EFFECT. STAFF RECOMMENDS AT LEAST A 4? DEPTH. | | | O EAST SIDE OF GARAGE NEED ADDITIONAL PANELS TO | | | SUCCESSFULLY PRODUCE THE ?DISSOLVING? EFFECT INTENDED. | | | O RENDERINGS SHOW WALL PANEL SYSTEM WITH A COLOR | | | VARIATION, HOW IS THAT VARIATION GOING TO BE ACHIEVED? | | | PLEASE PROVIDE COLOR SAMPLES. | | | O WHAT IS THE DEPTH OF THE REVEAL FOR THE WALL PANEL | | | SYSTEM? | | | O PLEASE CONFIRM THE GARAGE IS A MECHANICALLY | | | VENTILATED GARAGE. | | | | | | 12. ADDITIONAL ARTICULATION SHALL BE PROVIDED TO | | | SEPARATE THE PAINT COLOR AT THE BASE FROM THE TOP | | | (SOUTH ELEVATION, AREA ABOVE LOBBY ENTRANCE). CURRENTLY | | | IS ONLY SEPARATED BY A REVEAL. | | | 13. THE WIDTH OF THE CAP ELEMENT SEPARATING THE BASE | | | FROM THE TOP ALONG BANYAN BLVD IS DIFFERENT FROM THE | | | ONE ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY. SHOULD THEY BE CONSISTENT? | | | 14. RENDERINGS SHOW LARGE TREES AT THE ROOF TOP TERRACE | | | LOCATED ON THE NW CORNER OF THE BUILDING (ON TOP OF | | | GARAGE), BUT LA DRAWINGS DO NOT INDICATE ANY PLANT | | | MATERIAL ON THAT TERRACE. A VINE SIMILAR TO THE ONE | | | INDICATED ON THE GARAGE SCREENING AT THE EAST COULD BE | | | A GOOD ADDITION. | | | 15. VIS.1 CONTEXT ELEVATION NEEDS TO INCLUDE THE | | | COURTHOUSE BUILDING. | | | 16. THE PLANT MATERIAL (CLUSIA GUTTIFERA) ADJACENT TO | | | THE ON-STREET PARKING SPACE NEEDS TO BE MODIFIED BY A | | | PLANT MATERIAL THAT ALLOWS PEOPLE TO STEP OUT OF THEIR | | | CARS (PERENNIAL PEANUT COULD BE AN OPTION). | | | 17. PLEASE REDUCE THE WIDTH OF THE CURB CUTS TO 20 FEET | | | SO THE MAXIMUM WIDTH AT THE CURB SIDE IS 25 FEET. | | | 18. THE PROPOSED BANYAN STREETSCAPE DESIGN DOES NOT | | | INCLUDE BRICK PAVERS ON THE SIDEWALK. PLEASE REMOVE | | | PAVERS FROM DESIGN. PAVERS CAN ALSO BE REMOVED FROM THE | | | DIXIE FRONTAGE AS DIXIE DOES NOT HAVE PAVERS ON | | | SIDEWALK EITHER. | | | 19. THE THREE TREES ALONG THE BANYAN FRONTAGE OF THE | | | EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN TREE | | | GRATES AND NOT WITH BASE PLANTING AS THE SIDEWALK IS | | | ONLY OVER 6 FEET. | | | 20. PLEASE CORRECT PARKING STRIPPING DETAIL TO REFLECT | | | CITY STANDARD. | | | 21. PLEASE INCLUDE A DETAIL NOTE ON THE CIVIL DRAWINGS | | | STATING THE SIDEWALK ELEVATION SHALL BE MAINTAINED AS | | | IT CROSS OVER THE DRIVEWAY. | | | 22. PLEASE REMOVE THE SMALL MEDIAN AT THE WEST PARKING | | | ENTRANCE (SHEET AS-1) AND REDUCE THE DRIVEWAY TO 20 | | | FEET. | | | 23. PLEASE REDUCE PARKING LOT DRIVEWAY TO 20 FEET IN | | | WIDTH. | | | 24. PLEASE PROVIDE PHOTOMETRICS FOR THE SIDEWALK AREA | | | AND PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND INCLUDE THE STANDARD LIGHT | | | FIXTURE DETAIL FOR THE DOWNTOWN FOR ALL FIXTURES WITHIN | | | THE ROW. | | | 25. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE | | | WITH PLANAR BREAK REQUIREMENTS, TRANSPARENCY | | | REQUIREMENTS, MAXIMUM FOOTPRINT, BLANK WALL REQUIREMENT | | | ETC. | | | 26. PLEASE USE THE GUIDELINES OF DRAWING SUBMITTAL TO | | | ENSURE ALL THE INFORMATION IS PROVIDED AND COMPLIANCE | | | CAN BE VERIFIED. | | | PLEASE RESUBMIT REVISED DRAWINGS AND A RESPONSE LETTER. | | | FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA | | | APONTE AT 561-822-1439. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-27-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
02-27-2020 |
Time |
12:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
01-30-2020 |
Time |
12:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-27 12:55:37 | THE LIST BELOW INCLUDES ALL COMMENTS PROVIDED TO THE | | | PROJECT FROM ITS ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL. STAFF REVIEW | | | CLASSIFIES COMMENTS AS SATISFIED, PARTIALLY SATISFIED | | | OR NOT SATISFIED. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ARE INCLUDED IN | | | THE OLD COMMENTS AND ARE SEPARATED FROM THE ORIGINAL | | | COMMENTS WITH AN -* SYMBOL. | | | WHEN RESUBMIT, PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER | | | ADDRESSING ALL THE COMMENTS. SUBMIT 8 FULL SET COPIES, | | | ONE 11 BY 17 AND A CD WILL ALL THE INFORMATION. A | | | RESUBMITTAL FEE WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS PROVIDED FOR THE 1-30-2020 | | | RESUBMITTAL (THIRD REVIEW): | | | 1. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE EXISTING CURB SO | | | IT IS CLEAR IF THE CURB LINE IS BEING MODIFIED. | | | SETBACKS SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE LOCATION OF THE | | | EXISTING CURB. | | | 2. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE CAR SHARING | | | STATING REQUIRED FOR THE MICRO- UNITS. IF PROJECT | | | PROVIDES THE MAXIMUM OF 0.5 PARKING SPACES FOR EACH | | | MICRO UNIT, 4 DEDICATED CAR SHARING SPACE WILL BE | | | REQUIRED. | | | 3. PLEASE START DISCUSSIONS WITH A CAR SHARE PROVIDED | | | TO ENSURE THE SYSTEM IS AVAILABLE TO TENANTS ONCE | | | OCCUPANCY STARTS. | | | 4. ACCORDING TO RESOLUTION NO. 211-17, THE PROJECT WILL | | | BE REQUIRED TO PAY AN ANNUAL FEE OF $12,120 TO SUPPORT | | | THE TROLLEY OPERATION. | | | 5. THE MINIMUM REQUIRED GUEST PARKING FOR THIS PROJECT | | | IS 12 SPACES, NOT 7. PLEASE ADJUST AND INDICATE THE | | | LOCATION OF GUEST PARKING INSIDE THE GARAGE. | | | 6. BIKE RACK ON BANYAN SHALL BE MOVED TO ALLOW PROPOSED | | | TREE TO BE CENTERED ON THE PLANTING AREA. | | | 7. PARKING SPACES ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE GARAGE SHALL | | | PROVIDE A CLEAR 24? BACK UP AREA. PLEASE ADJUST. | | | 8. COMMERCIAL SPACE ON THE GROUND FLOOR SHALL HAVE A | | | MINIMUM DEPTH OF 25?. IF CONSTRAINTS EXIST A VARIANCE | | | SHALL BE REQUESTED. | | | 9. BALCONY AT THE CORNER OF BANYAN AND DIXIE IS | | | ENCROACHING INTO THE ROW. AN AERIAL ENCROACHMENT | | | EASEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | 10. FURTHER DISCUSSION IS NECESSARY TO DETERMINE ANY | | | NECESSARY UPGRADES TO THE EXISTING BUS STOP LOCATED | | | ALONG BANYAN BOULEVARD. | | | 11. EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX AT THE CORNER OF BANYAN | | | AND DIXIE SHALL BE RELOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE PATH OF | | | TRAVEL. FURTHER DISCUSSION NECESSARY TO DETERMINE BEST | | | LOCATION. | | | 12. PLEASE NOTE THE EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING AND THE | | | PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING ARE UNDER A SINGLE SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL, AND THEIR COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE | | | ENCOMPASSES THE TWO BUILDINGS. IF THE PARCEL IS DIVIDED | | | INTO TWO OWNERSHIPS IN THE FUTURE, THE SITE PLAN IS | | | STILL MAINTAINED AS ONE, AND CROSS ACCESS AGREEMENTS | | | WILL BE NEEDED. | | | 13. PLEASE SUBMIT SCHOOL CONCURRENCY APPROVAL LETTER. | | | | | | COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS: | | | COMMENTS PROVIDED FOR THE 10-30-19 RESUBMITTAL (SECOND | | | REVIEW): | | | 1. NOT SATISFIED- PUBLIC OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM ON SHEET | | | LP.1 SHOWS THE POS ENCROACHING INTO THE MINIMUM SETBACK | | | AREA. AREA IS INDICATED AS 2,231SF, MORE THAN THE | | | 2,171SF REQUIRED. PLEASE ADJUST AND CONFIRM AREA | | | OUTSIDE THE SETBACK STILL COMPLIES WITH THE POS | | | REQUIRED. -*PUBLIC OPEN SPACE DESIGN IS ENCROACHING | | | INTO THE MINIMUM SETBACK. AREA WITHIN THE MINIMUM | | | SETBACK CANNOT BE COUNTED AS PART OF THE POS. | | | 2. SATISFIED-SIDEWALK SHALL BE A MINIMUM 8 FEET IN | | | WIDTH. | | | 3. SATISFIED- SURVEY NEEDS TO INCLUDE SITE TOTAL SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE. | | | 4. SATISFIED- PLEASE REMOVE STRIPPING DETAIL INCLUDED | | | ON PAGE 7 OF THE PAVING AND DRAINAGE DETAILS OF CIVIL | | | DRAWINGS. -*PARKING STRIPPING DETAIL SHALL FOLLOW CITY | | | STANDARD. | | | 5. NOT SATISFIED- THE APPLICANT SHALL EXPLORE | | | ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS TO REDUCE THE DIFFERENT VARIANCES | | | REQUESTED. PLEASE EXPLORE THE POSSIBILITY OF REDUCING | | | THE PROPOSED CURB CUT ON DIXIE HWAY TO ONE RIGHT TURN | | | EXIT ONLY, AND RELOCATING THE GARBAGE ROOM AND THE FIRE | | | ROOM TO THE INSIDE TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ACTIVE USES | | | ALONG DIXIE HWAY. REGARDING THE ACTIVE USES ALONG | | | BANYAN BLVD, APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE DETAIL INFORMATION | | | OF THE PROPOSED GARAGE SCREENING AND ART INSTALLATION | | | TO JUSTIFY THE REQUESTED VARIANCE. THE TREATMENT OF THE | | | GARAGE STRUCTURE WILL BE FUNDAMENTAL TO DETERMINE | | | VARIANCE JUSTIFICATION AND MITIGATION OF NEGATIVE | | | IMPACTS. IF THE ART IN PUBLIC PLACES IS PROPOSED AS | | | GARAGE SCREENING THE ARTIST SHALL BE INVOLVED RIGHT | | | AWAY SO THE PROPOSED ART IS AVAILABLE FOR DAC REVIEW | | | WHEN THE VARIANCE IS PRESENTED FOR THEIR CONSIDERATION. | | | -*STAFF RECOMMENDS ARCHITECT TO FURTHER STUDY THE | | | BUILDING PLACEMENT AND PUBLIC OPEN SPACE IN ORDER TO | | | ENSURE THE PROPOSED PROJECT COMPLIES WITH ZONING | | | REGULATIONS REGARDING ACTIVE USES. AT THIS POINT IT | | | DOES NOT SEEM A HARDSHIP EXIST FOR THE REQUESTED | | | VARIANCE. STAFF RECOMMENDS SCHEDULING A MEETING TO | | | FURTHER DISCUSS OPTIONS. | | | COMMENTS PROVIDED FOR THE 8-13-19 ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL | | | (FIRST REVIEW) | | | 1. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE USE GUIDELINES PROVIDED TO | | | DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH PLANAR BREAK, BLANK WALL | | | REGULATIONS, FA?ADE ARTICULATION, TRANSPARENCY, | | | ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT, HORIZONTAL PROJECTIONS ETC. IT | | | SEEMS THE PROJECT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE MAXIMUM | | | BLANK WALL REGULATION. PLANAR BREAK SHALL BE PROVIDED | | | ON ALL THE PODIUM FLOORS (UP TO 7TH STORY). -*PLEASE | | | PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH PLANAR | | | BREAKS, FACADE ARTICULATION, ACTIVE USE AND OTHER | | | DESIGN REQUIREMENTS. USE GUIDELINES. | | | 2. NOT SATISFIED- 58 BIKE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED | | | INSIDE GARAGE, 60 SPACES REQUIRED.-* PLEASE INCLUDE | | | RESIDENTIAL BIKE PARKING REQUIREMENTS 1/15 REQUIRED | | | PARKING SPACES. IN ADDITION, 1 BIKE PARKING SPACE | | | REQUIRED FOR RETAIL USE. BOTH SHALL BE INSIDE THE | | | GARAGE. | | | 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE LOCATION AND PROVIDE | | | DETAILS FOR THE REQUIRED BIKE PARKING FOR GENERAL | | | PUBLIC TO BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC REALM. | | | 4. NOT SATISFIED- PARKING SPACES ARE NOT DIMENSIONED. | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT IN THOSE CASES WHERE THE SIDE OF ANY | | | STALL IS ADJACENT TO A WALL, COLUMN OF OTHER PHYSICAL | | | OBSTRUCTION, THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A | | | MIN OF ONE FOOT (SEC 94-111(C)). -*PLEASE DIMENSION THE | | | PARKING SPACES INSIDE THE GARAGE TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE. | | | CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-111(C). | | | 5. SATISFIED- PLEASE PROVIDE A SUMMARY TABLE IN SHEET | | | Z-1 WITH THE GROSS BUILDING AREA FOR EACH FLOOR PLUS | | | TOTAL .-*PLEASE PROVIDE A GROSS BUILDING AREA TABLE. | | | CLARIFY WHAT IS THE BOH SPACE ON FLOORS 7TH TO 16TH. | | | 6. SATISFIED-PLEASE LABEL GARAGE 2ND LEVEL AS MEZZANINE | | | SO IT IS CLEAR THE BUILDING IS ONLY 15 STORIES. | | | 7. SATISFIED - PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THE TRASH PICK- UP | | | OPERATION FOR THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING IS, AND WHERE IS | | | THE DUMPSTER FOR THE EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING. | | | 8. SATISFIED-THE WEST LANDSCAPE BUFFER FOR THE SURFACE | | | PARKING LOT IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE MINIMUM FIVE | | | FOOT WIDTH. | | | 9. NOT SATISFIED - PLEASE PROVIDE AUTOTURN FOR LOADING | | | AREA. | | | 10. SATISFIED- ADDITIONAL COORDINATION WILL BE NEEDED | | | TO DETERMINE CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULES AND | | | RESPONSIBILITIES. -*STREETSCAPE SHALL BE COORDINATED | | | WITH THE BANYAN STREETSCAPE PROJECT CURRENTLY UNDER | | | DESIGN PHASE BY THE CITY. | | | 11. PARTIALLY SATISFIED- ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED IN PREPARATION FOR THE DAC SPECIAL REVIEW. | | | THE GARAGE SCREENING SHALL BE DETAILED TO SUPPORT THE | | | VARIANCE REQUEST, AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NEEDED | | | REGARDING HORIZONTAL PROJECTION ON THE GROUND FLOOR. | | | ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL | | | FACADES ENCLOSING NON ACTIVE USE. SEE SECTION 94-109. | | | -*PLEASE PROVIDE COLORED ELEVATIONS WITH CALL OUT | | | MATERIAL AND PICTURES OF SPECIAL MATERIALS AND | | | FINISHES. | | | 12. PARTIALLY SATISFIED- PLEASE INCLUDE THE HISTORIC | | | COURTHOUSE IN THE CONTEXT WEST ELEVATION. PLEASE | | | INCLUDE THE EAST AND NORTH ELEVATIONS IN THE CONTEXT. | | | -*PLEASE PROVIDE COLORED ELEVATIONS INSERTED IN THE | | | CONTEXT. | | | 13. NOT SATISFIED ? APPLICANT SHALL DEMONSTRATE THE | | | REQUESTED VARIANCE IS THE MINIMUM VARIANCE POSSIBLE. | | | SEE STAFF SUGGESTIONS UNDER COMMENT NO. 5. -*PROPOSED | | | PROJECT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENT | | | ALONG DIXIE HWAY OR BANYAN BOULEVARD. | | | 14. NOT SATISFIED- ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED ON FACADES ENCLOSING NON-ACTIVE USES. IN THE | | | CASE WHERE THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE FROM | | | THE ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENT, ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT | | | ABOVE AND BEYOND THE MINIMUM REQUIRED BY THE CODE WILL | | | BE NEEDED TO SUPPORT ANY VARIANCE AND DEMONSTRATE A | | | REDUCTION OF THE NEGATIVE IMPACT CAUSED BY THE ABSENCE | | | OF ACTIVE USES. -*PARKING GARAGE TREATMENT DOES NOT | | | SEEM TO COMPLY WITH NON-ACTIVE USE FA?ADE ARTICULATION | | | REGULATIONS. | | | 15. NOT SATISFIED ? WHAT ARE THE PROPOSED ENHANCEMENTS | | | TO MITIGATE THE NEGATIVE IMPACTS GENERATED BY THE LACK | | | OF ACTIVE USES ALONG THE MINIMUM REQUIRED OPEN SPACE | | | PERIMETER? -* PUBLIC OPEN SPACE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH | | | MINIMUM ACTIVE USE ABUTMENT. MINIMUM 25% REQUIRED, | | | PROJECT PROVIDES 18.7%. PLEASE STUDY ALTERNATIVES TO | | | COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENT. | | | 16. SATISFIED ? PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SURVEY | | | CONDUCTED TO DETERMINE THE EXACT SQUARE FOOTAGE OF | | | EXISTING BUILDING. -* PALM BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY | | | APPRAISER?S WEBSITE LISTS TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR | | | EXISTING BUILDING AT 44,590SF VS 40,000 LISTED IN | | | PROJECT DATA. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAIL INFORMATION TO | | | CONFIRM THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING BUILDING. | | | 17. SATISFIED ? PLEASE ADJUST TREE LOCATION BASED ON | | | LANDSCAPE COMMENTS. -* EXISTING OLIVE TREES ALONG | | | BANYAN AND OLIVE AVENUE SHALL BE REPLACED WITH NEW | | | TREES PLANTED WITH THE REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL AROUND | | | IT. | | | 18. NOT SATISFIED ? ADDITIONAL REDUCTION ON CURB CUTS | | | MAY BE AVAILABLE TO THE PROJECT. -* PLEASE STUDY THE | | | POSSIBILITY TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF CURB CUTS FOR THE | | | PROJECT TO MINIMIZE PEDESTRIAN IMPACT. THE BANK DRIVE | | | THRU LANES COMBINED WITH THE PARKING ACCESS CREATES A | | | 56 FOOT WIDE CURB CUT, VERY DANGEROUS FOR | | | PEDESTRIANS.STUDY THE POSSIBILITY TO MOVE DRIVE THRU | | | NORTH TO ALLOW ONLY ONE EXIT INTO THE STREET AND | | | PROVIDE A LANDSCAPED MEDIAN. | | | 19. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - LIGHT POLES SHALL BE LOCATED | | | GENERALLY ALIGNED WITH THE STREET TREES AND OUTSIDE THE | | | MINIMUM 8 FEET WIDE CLEAR SIDEWALK. PLEASE IDENTIFY IF | | | THERE ARE ANY EXISTING COBRA LIGHTS AND POLE THAT NEED | | | TO BE REMOVED, AND CONFIRM THE NEW FIXTURES WILL | | | PROVIDE ENOUGH LIGHTING TO ILLUMINATE THE SIDEWALK AND | | | THE STREET. STREET LIGHTING FIXTURE AND POLE SHALL | | | MATCH CITY STANDARD. PLEASE INCLUDE CITY?S SPEC SHEET | | | IN SHEET L1. - *PLEASE PROVIDE PHOTOMETRICS FOR THE | | | STREET TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM 0.6 | | | FOOTCANDLE REQUIRED. DECORATIVE LIGHT FIXTURES ARE | | | REQUIRED ALONG THE STREET FRONTAGE. POLE AND FIXTURE | | | SHALL MEET DOWNTOWN STANDARD. | | | 20. SATISFIED- PLEASE PROVIDE TERMINAL ISLAND FOR ANGLE | | | PARKING FROM OLIVE AVENUE. | | | 21. SATISFIED- REDUCE CURB CUT ON OLIVE AVENUE TO THE | | | MINIMUM NEEDED FOR ONE WAY ACCESS. | | | 22. PARTIALLY SATISFIED- PLEASE INCLUDE A NOT ON THE | | | CIVIL DRAWINGS AS THE CONSTRUCTION TEAM WILL NOT LOOK | | | AT THE SITE PLAN DRAWING. INDICATE THE SPOT ELEVATIONS | | | TO DEMONSTRATE THE SIDEWALK GRADE ELEVATION WILL BE | | | MAINTAINED ACROSS THE DRIVEWAY. -* SIDEWALK GRADE SHALL | | | BE MAINTAINED AT CURB CUTS CROSSING. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-16-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
12-16-2019 |
Time |
19:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
12-16-2019 |
Time |
15:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-12-16 19:31:02 | ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS WERE NOT SUBMITTED TO ADDRESS | | | ZONING COMMENTS. ZONING COMMENTS FOR THE 10/30/19 | | | RESUBMITTAL IS VERY LIMITED DUE TO INCOMPLETE | | | INFORMATION. | | | COMMENTS FOR REVISED SITE PLAN (COMMENT NUMBER FOLLOWS | | | PREVIOUS REVIEW) | | | 3. PUBLIC BIKE PARKING AT DIXIE CORNER SHALL BE | | | RELOCATED BETWEEN THE STREET TREES LOCATED ALONG DIXIE | | | HWAY. | | | 17. NOT SATISFIED- SITE PLAN SHALL INDICATE THE STREETS | | | ALONG OLIVE AVENUE. EXISTING TREES ALONG OLIVE AVENUE | | | AND DIXIE HWAY SHALL BE REPLACED WITH NEW TREES PLANTED | | | WITH THE REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL AROUND IT. | | | 18. SIDEWALK GRADE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT CURB CUTS | | | CROSSING. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: | | | 1. PUBLIC OPEN SPACE DESIGN IS ENCROACHING INTO THE | | | MINIMUM SETBACK. AREA WITHIN THE MINIMUM SETBACK CANNOT | | | BE COUNTED AS PART OF THE POS. | | | 2. SIDEWALK SHALL BE A MINIMUM 8 FEET IN WIDTH. | | | 3. SURVEY NEEDS TO INCLUDE SITE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE. | | | 4. PARKING STRIPPING DETAIL SHALL FOLLOW CITY STANDARD. | | | 5. STAFF RECOMMENDS ARCHITECT TO FURTHER STUDY THE | | | BUILDING PLACEMENT AND PUBLIC OPEN SPACE IN ORDER TO | | | ENSURE THE PROPOSED PROJECT COMPLIES WITH ZONING | | | REGULATIONS REGARDING ACTIVE USES. AT THIS POINT IT | | | DOES NOT SEEM A HARDSHIP EXIST FOR THE REQUESTED | | | VARIANCE. STAFF RECOMMENDS SCHEDULIGN A MEETING TO | | | FURTHER DISCUSS OPTIONS. | | | | | | FOR RESUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE EIGHT REVISED LARGE | | | SETS, ONE 11 BY 17 SET, AND A CD WITH ALL INFORMATION | | | IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT. PLEASE INCLUDE RESPONSE LETTERS | | | ADDRESSING ALL COMMENTS. PLEASE DO NOT RESUBMIT UNLESS | | | YOU HAVE ARCHITECTURAL, LANDSCAPE, AND CIVIL DRAWINGS | | | TO ADDRESS COMMENTS. | | | FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA | | | APONTE AT 561-822-1439. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-11-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
09-11-2019 |
Time |
12:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
08-13-2019 |
Time |
12:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-09-11 12:12:44 | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE | | | WITH PLANAR BREAKS, FACADE ARTICULATION, ACTIVE USE AND | | | OTHER DESIGN REQUIREMENTS. USE GUIDELINES. | | | 2. PLEASE INCLUDE RESIDENTIAL BIKE PARKING REQUIREMENTS | | | 1/15 REQUIRED PARKING SPACES. IN ADDITION, 1 BIKE | | | PARKING SPACE REQUIRED FOR RETAIL USE. BOTH SHALL BE | | | INSIDE THE GARAGE. | | | 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE LOCATION AND PROVIDE DETAILS FOR | | | THE REQUIRED BIKE PARKING FOR GENERAL PUBLIC TO BE | | | LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC REALM. | | | 4. PLEASE DIMENSION THE PARKING SPACES INSIDE THE | | | GARAGE TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE. CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH | | | SECTION 94-111(C). | | | 5. PLEASE PROVIDE A GROSS BUILDING AREA TABLE. CLARIFY | | | WHAT IS THE BOH SPACE ON FLOORS 7TH TO 16TH. | | | 6. PLEASE LABEL GARAGE 2ND LEVEL AS MEZZANINE SO IT IS | | | CLEAR THE BUILDING IS ONLY 15 STORIES. | | | 7. PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THE TRASH PICK- UP OPERATION FOR | | | THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING IS, AND WHERE IS THE DUMPSTER | | | FOR THE EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING. | | | 8. THE WEST LANDSCAPE BUFFER FOR THE SURFACE PARKING | | | LOT IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE MINIMUM FIVE FOOT | | | WIDTH. | | | 9. PLEASE PROVIDE AUTOTURN FOR LOADING AREA. | | | 10. STREETSCAPE SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE BANYAN | | | STREETSCAPE PROJECT CURRENTLY UNDER DESIGN PHASE BY THE | | | CITY. | | | 11. PLEASE PROVIDE COLORED ELEVATIONS WITH CALL OUT | | | MATERIAL AND PICTURES OF SPECIAL MATERIALS AND | | | FINISHES. | | | 12. PLEASE PROVIDE COLORED ELEVATIONS INSERTED IN THE | | | CONTEXT. | | | 13. PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH ACTIVE USE | | | REQUIREMENT ALONG DIXIE HWAY OR BANYAN BOULEVARD. | | | 14. PARKING GARAGE TREATMENT DOES NOT SEEM TO COMPLY | | | WITH NON-ACTIVE USE FA?ADE ARTICULATION REGULATIONS. | | | 15. PUBLIC OPEN SPACE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH MINIMUM | | | ACTIVE USE ABUTMENT. MINIMUM 25% REQUIRED, PROJECT | | | PROVIDES 18.7%. PLEASE STUDY ALTERNATIVES TO COMPLY | | | WITH REQUIREMENT. | | | 16. PALM BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER?S WEBSITE | | | LISTS TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR EXISTING BUILDING AT | | | 44,590SF VS 40,000 LISTED IN PROJECT DATA. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE DETAIL INFORMATION TO CONFIRM THE SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE OF EXISTING BUILDING. | | | 17. EXISTING OLIVE TREES ALONG BANYAN AND OLIVE AVENUE | | | SHALL BE REPLACED WITH NEW TREES PLANTED WITH THE | | | REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL AROUND IT. | | | 18. PLEASE STUDY THE POSSIBILITY TO REDUCE THE NUMBER | | | OF CURB CUTS FOR THE PROJECT TO MINIMIZE PEDESTRIAN | | | IMPACT. THE BANK DRIVE THRU LANES COMBINED WITH THE | | | PARKING ACCESS CREATES A 56 FOOT WIDE CURB CUT, VERY | | | DANGEROUS FOR PEDESTRIANS.STUDY THE POSSIBILITY TO MOVE | | | DRIVE THRU NORTH TO ALLOW ONLY ONE EXIT INTO THE STREET | | | AND PROVIDE A LANDSCAPED MEDIAN. | | | 19. PLEASE PROVIDE PHOTOMETRICS FOR THE STREET TO | | | CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM 0.6 FOOTCANDLE | | | REQUIRED. DECORATIVE LIGHT FIXTURES ARE REQUIRED ALONG | | | THE STREET FRONTAGE. POLE AND FIXTURE SHALL MEET | | | DOWNTOWN STANDARD. | | | 20. PLEASE PROVIDE TERMINAL ISLAND FOR ANGLE PARKING | | | FROM OLIVE AVENUE. | | | 21. REDUCE CURB CUT ON OLIVE AVENUE TO THE MINIMUM | | | NEEDED FOR ONE WAY ACCESS. | | | 22. DRIVEWAYS SHALL MAINTAINED THE SIDEWALK ELEVATION. | | | FOR RESUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE EIGHT REVISED SETS, ONE | | | 11 BY 17 SET, AND A CD WITH ALL INFORMATION. INCLUDE | | | RESPONSE LETTERS ADDRESSING ALL COMMENTS WITH EACH | | | COPY. | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |