| Plan Review Stops For Project Z19070022 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-14-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
08-14-2019 |
Time |
12:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
08-14-2019 |
Time |
12:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-08-14 12:35:48 | NO COMMENTS ON THA ADDITIONAL PARKING PROVIDED THE | | | PROPOSED PARKING WILL NOT INCREASE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF | | | PARKING SPACES AVAILABLE TO EMPLOYEES OR CUSTOMERS. IT | | | IS UNDERSTOOD THAT THE PROPOSED PARKING SPACES ARE FOR | | | THE STORAGE OF VEHICLES FOR SALE. | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-07-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
08-07-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
08-07-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-08-07 11:08:41 | PASSED WITH PROVISOS: | | | | | | FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE | | | | | | 1) RELOCATE ALL PROPOSED GATES AWAY FROM CITY OF WPB | | | WATER AND SEWER LINES, POSSIBLY ALONG NORTH EDGE OF | | | LANDSCAPE EASEMENT. | | | | | | 2) NO PROPOSED IRRIGATION IS SHOWN FOR | | | LANDSCAPING/TREES; IF IRRIGATION IS WARRANTED, SHOW | | | WATER CONNECTION TO CITY FACILITIES AND INCLUDE | | | PROPOSED WATER DEMANDS ON DRAWINGS PER FAC 64-E.008. | | | | | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | CONCERNS, THANKS. | | | | | | RICK ROSSANO | | | PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 | | | MOBILE: (561) 246-9525 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING | | | | | | MANNY GONZALEZ | | | SENIOR ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1085 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 | | | MOBILE: (561) 644-7301 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING | | | | | | CENTRAL OPERATIONS CENTER (DISPATCH): | | | 24-HOUR EMERGENCY RESPONSE SERVICES TO PUBLIC | | | UTILITIES, PUBLIC WORKS, PARKS, ETC. 561-822-2210 | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-02-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
08-02-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
08-02-2019 |
Time |
16:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-08-02 16:49:02 | FIRE HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED. | | | | | | HOWEVER, IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED TO PROVIDE KNOX | | | PADLOCKS ON GATES FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT EMERGENCY ACCESS | | | IF THE EVENT OF INCIDENT WITHIN THE FENCED IN AREA. | | | | | | THE LOCKS CAN BE CONFIGURED TO WORK IN CONJUNCTION WITH | | | YOURS SO THAT SECURITY CAN BE MAINTAINED. | | | | | | IF CHAINS AND PADLOCKS ARE NOT PROPOSED AND ELECTRIC | | | GATES ARE USED, A KNOX KEY SWITCH IS RECOMMENDED. | | | | | | | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
11-21-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
11-21-2019 |
Time |
14:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
11-21-2019 |
Time |
14:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-11-21 15:01:44 | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
10-31-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
10-31-2019 |
Time |
15:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
10-31-2019 |
Time |
15:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-10-31 15:36:31 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: FPL PARKING LOTS Z19070022 | | | OCTOBER 31, 2019 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS THAT ADDRESS THE CLASS B | | | AND SITE PLAN PETITIONS: | | | | | | 1. REVISE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN SHEET TDP-1 TO SHOW: | | | ? SATISFIED. THE CONDITION OF EACH TREE, NOTING THAT | | | ALL NATIVE TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION MUST BE | | | PRESERVED OR RELOCATED. | | | ? SATISFIED. INCLUDE CANOPY DIAMETER MEASUREMENT FOR | | | TREES IN ORDER TO CALCULATE MITIGATION DUE IF REMOVED. | | | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MITIGATION CHART BASED ON THE | | | PLANT LIST SHOWING THE AMOUNT OF TREE CANOPY SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE REMOVED AND PROVIDED AS REPLACEMENT. | | | SHOW CANOPY MITIGATION OF 300 SQ FT FOR EACH LIVE OAK | | | REMOVED, AND 100 SQ FT EACH FOR SABAL PALMS. TOTAL | | | MITIGATION DUE WILL BE 1700 SQ FT. | | | SHOW TOTAL FOR REPLACEMENT FROM PROPOSED TREES. | | | | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. SHOW CALCULATIONS FOR EACH PARCEL FOR | | | PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS AND TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA. | | | AN ACCURATE ACCOUNTING FOR EACH PARCEL IS REQUIRED | | | COMBINING PREVIOUS APPROVALS AND THE CURRENT REQUEST TO | | | VERIFY CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A | | | MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO | | | BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING | | | AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. A WAIVER MUST BE | | | REQUESTED AS PART OF THE CLASS B SPECIAL USE IF THIS | | | CANNOT BE MET DUE TO SITE UTILITY CONSTRAINTS. | | | A VARIANCE HAS BEEN REQUESTED. STAFF WILL EVALUATE | | | COMPLIANCE WITH VARIANCE REQUIREMENTS. | | | VARIANCE WAS APPROVED WITH CLASS B USE PERMIT. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443 (C)(6) OPTIONS ARE | | | INTENDED TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ROOT ZONE FOR SHADE | | | TREES AND PROVIDE MAXIMUM OVERHEAD TREE CANOPY FOR THE | | | VEHICLES. UNLESS THE SHADE TREE CAN BE PROVIDED, THIS | | | SECTION CANNOT BE USED TO EXPAND THE NUMBER OF PARKING | | | SPACES IN A ROW TO 12. THE MINIMUM 8 FEET WIDTH INSIDE | | | CURB LANDSCAPE ISLANDS MUST BE PROVIDED EVERY 10 | | | SPACES. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR ALL BUFFERS WITH | | | ACCESS DRIVEWAYS TO SHOW THEY DO NOT EXCEED 25% | | | INTERRUPTION FOR VEHICULAR ACCESS AS REQUIRED BY | | | SECTION 94-443(B)(2). | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. STAFF RECOMMENDS PLACING THE LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFER HEDGE OUTSIDE THE FENCE AND WALLS TO PROVIDE THE | | | REQUIRED BUFFERING OF THE USE FROM THE ADJACENT | | | PROPERTIES, ALLEY AND ROADS. A HEDGE OF UP TO 18 INCHES | | | SHOULD BE INDICATED ALONG THE SIGHT TRIANGLES TO | | | PROVIDE VISUAL BUFFERING. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. STAFF RECOMMENDS REMOVING WHEEL STOPS AND | | | INSTEAD PROVIDE CURBS WHERE POSSIBLE TO INCREASE | | | LANDSCAPE AND PERVIOUS AREA AND REDUCE PAVED AREA. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING | | | AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND | | | LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH | | | SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4). | | | ADD THE CALCULATIONS FOR SECTION (4) AND PROVIDE THE | | | TOTAL FOR BOTH REQUIRED TO THE CHART ON SHEET LP-1. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. CORRECT EACH BUFFER SEGMENT IN THE | | | BUFFER CALCULATIONS TO SHOW REQUIRED BUFFER TREE COUNTS | | | THAT ARE ROUNDED UP FOR EVERY 30 FEET AND ANY PORTION | | | THEREOF. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-24-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-24-2019 |
Time |
13:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-24-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-09-24 13:40:33 | CONDITION PROVIDED REGARDING THE COMPARISON OF THE TREE | | | CANOPY NOT PROVIDED AND MITIGATION PROPOSED TO | | | COMPENSATE FOR HEAT ISLAND. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-12-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
08-12-2019 |
Time |
16:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
08-12-2019 |
Time |
16:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-08-12 17:00:30 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: FPL PARKING LOTS Z19070022 | | | AUGUST 12, 2019 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS THAT ADDRESS THE CLASS B | | | AND SITE PLAN PETITIONS: | | | | | | 1. REVISE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN SHEET TDP-1 TO SHOW: | | | ? THE CONDITION OF EACH TREE, NOTING THAT ALL NATIVE | | | TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION MUST BE PRESERVED OR | | | RELOCATED. | | | ? INCLUDE CANOPY DIAMETER MEASUREMENT FOR TREES IN | | | ORDER TO CALCULATE MITIGATION DUE IF REMOVED. | | | ? PROVIDE A MITIGATION CHART BASED ON THE PLANT LIST | | | SHOWING THE AMOUNT OF TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE | | | REMOVED AND PROVIDED AS REPLACEMENT. | | | | | | 2. SHOW CALCULATIONS FOR EACH PARCEL FOR PERVIOUS AND | | | IMPERVIOUS AREAS AND TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA. AN ACCURATE | | | ACCOUNTING FOR EACH PARCEL IS REQUIRED COMBINING | | | PREVIOUS APPROVALS AND THE CURRENT REQUEST TO VERIFY | | | CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. | | | | | | 3. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A MINIMUM OF 75 | | | PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED | | | WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING AREA SHALL | | | BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. A WAIVER MUST BE REQUESTED | | | AS PART OF THE CLASS B SPECIAL USE IF THIS CANNOT BE | | | MET DUE TO SITE UTILITY CONSTRAINTS. | | | | | | 4. SECTION 94-443 (C)(6) OPTIONS ARE INTENDED TO | | | PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ROOT ZONE FOR SHADE TREES AND | | | PROVIDE MAXIMUM OVERHEAD TREE CANOPY FOR THE VEHICLES. | | | UNLESS THE SHADE TREE CAN BE PROVIDED, THIS SECTION | | | CANNOT BE USED TO EXPAND THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES | | | IN A ROW TO 12. THE MINIMUM 8 FEET WIDTH INSIDE CURB | | | LANDSCAPE ISLANDS MUST BE PROVIDED EVERY 10 SPACES. | | | | | | 5. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR ALL BUFFERS WITH ACCESS | | | DRIVEWAYS TO SHOW THEY DO NOT EXCEED 25% INTERRUPTION | | | FOR VEHICULAR ACCESS AS REQUIRED BY SECTION | | | 94-443(B)(2). | | | | | | 6. STAFF RECOMMENDS PLACING THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER HEDGE | | | OUTSIDE THE FENCE AND WALLS TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED | | | BUFFERING OF THE USE FROM THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES, | | | ALLEY AND ROADS. A HEDGE OF UP TO 18 INCHES SHOULD BE | | | INDICATED ALONG THE SIGHT TRIANGLES TO PROVIDE VISUAL | | | BUFFERING. | | | | | | 7. STAFF RECOMMENDS REMOVING WHEEL STOPS AND INSTEAD | | | PROVIDE CURBS WHERE POSSIBLE TO INCREASE LANDSCAPE AND | | | PERVIOUS AREA AND REDUCE PAVED AREA. | | | | | | 8. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING AREA SURFACE | | | CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND LANDSCAPE AREAS | | | PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 94-443 | | | (C)(3) AND (4). | | | ADD THE CALCULATIONS FOR SECTION (4) AND PROVIDE THE | | | TOTAL FOR BOTH REQUIRED TO THE CHART ON SHEET LP-1. | | | | | | 9. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN | | | TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 10. CORRECT EACH BUFFER SEGMENT IN THE BUFFER | | | CALCULATIONS TO SHOW REQUIRED BUFFER TREE COUNTS THAT | | | ARE ROUNDED UP FOR EVERY 30 FEET AND ANY PORTION | | | THEREOF. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-12-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
08-12-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
08-12-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-08-12 17:07:02 | PUBLIC WORKS HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
12-05-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
12-05-2019 |
Time |
10:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
12-05-2019 |
Time |
10:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-19-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
11-19-2019 |
Time |
12:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
11-19-2019 |
Time |
12:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-11-19 12:03:00 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | NOVEMBER 15, 2019 SUBMITTAL REVIEW PACKAGE: | | | | | | 1. THE UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN FOR THE STORMWATER PIPES | | | CROSSING THE LOTS SHOULD BE LABELED AS DRAINAGE | | | EASEMENTS. | | | | | | 2. THE PERIMETER BERMS SHOULD BE HIGHER THAN THE WEIR | | | ELEVATIONS BY 3 INCHES OR MORE SO THAT ALL DISCHARGE | | | FOR THE DESIGN STORM WILL BE THROUGH THE CONTROL | | | STRUCTURES. | | | | | | 3. ADDITIONAL ROOT BARRIERS WILL BE NEEDED BETWEEN | | | PROPOSED TREES AND THE PROPOSED DRAINAGE EASEMENTS. | | | SPECIFICALLY, ADD ROOT BARRIERS FOR THESE LANDSCAPE | | | ISLANDS: | | | | | | SHEET LP-3 | | | - ADD ROOT BARRIER IN THE NORTH-SOUTH ORIENTATION | | | BETWEEN THE EAST SIDE OF THE TWO PROPOSED DRAINAGE | | | EASEMENTS AND THE TREES ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE; | | | - ADD ROOT BARRIER ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPOSED | | | DRAINAGE EASEMENT OR WEST CURBLINE OF THE CENTER | | | LANDSCAPE ISLAND NEXT TO THE WEST DRAINAGE EASEMENT; | | | - ADD ROOT BARRIER ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPOSED | | | DRAINAGE EASEMENT OR WEST CURBLINE OF THE EASTERN-MOST | | | LANDSCAPE ISLAND NEXT TO THE EAST DRAINAGE EASEMENT; | | | | | | SHEET LP-4 | | | - ADD ROOT BARRIER ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROPOSED | | | DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR THE TREE IN THE WIDE LANDSCAPE | | | ISLAND IN THE CENTER OF THE PARKING LOT; | | | - ADD ROOT BARRIER ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPOSED | | | DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR THE TREE NEAR THE SOUTH PROPERTY | | | LINE | | | | | | SHEET LP-5 | | | - ADD ROOT BARRIER ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPOSED | | | DRAINAGE EASEMENT OR WEST CURBLINE OF THE CENTER | | | LANDSCAPE ISLAND; | | | - ADD ROOT BARRIER ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPOSED | | | DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR THE TREE NEXT TO THE SOUTH | | | PROPERTY LINE; | | | | | | SHEET LP-6 | | | - ADD ROOT BARRIER IN THE NORTH-SOUTH ORIENTATION | | | BETWEEN THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPOSED DRAINAGE | | | EASEMENTS AND THE TREE ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE; | | | | | | 4. PROVIDE CCTV OF THE DRAINAGE PIPES BETWEEN THE ALLEY | | | AND CANAL. | | | | | | 5. WEIR ELEVATIONS ARE HIGHER THAN PAVEMENT GRADE | | | ELEVATIONS. APPLICANT RESPONDED THAT THE EXFILTRATION | | | TRENCH IS DESIGN TO STORE THE RUNOFF FROM THE 10-YEAR | | | 1-DAY DESIGN STORM EVENT WITHOUT THE PARKING LOT | | | FLOODING. THE OVERFLOW WEIR ELEVATION FOR EACH PARKING | | | LOT WAS SET TO CONTAIN ONSITE THE RUNOFF FROM THE | | | 10-YEAR 3-DAY DESIGN STORM. | | | | | | OVER TIME THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE EXFILTRATION SYSTEMS | | | TO DISPOSE OF THE STORMWATER RUNOFF WILL DIMINISH TO | | | THE EXTENT THAT THE PARKING LOT WILL LIKELY FLOOD FOR | | | STORM EVENTS SMALLER THAN THE 10-YEAR 1-DAY DESIGN | | | STORM. THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE THAT THERE IS A | | | RISK OF THERE BEING 12 TO 17 INCHES OF STANDING WATER | | | IN THE PARKING LOTS DURING AND AFTER A STORM EVENT AND, | | | DEPENDING ON THE GROUNDWATER TABLE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF | | | THE EXFILTRATION TRENCHES, THE PARKING LOT(S) MAY BE | | | FLOODED FOR AN EXTENDED PERIOD OF TIME. | | | | | | THE APPLICANT/OWNER SHOULD ACKNOWLEDGE THIS SITUATION | | | AND AGREE TO INCLUDE LANGUAGE REGARDING THE FLOOD RISK | | | IN LEASE AGREEMENTS FOR THE SITES. | | | | | | TRACY L. WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-30-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
10-30-2019 |
Time |
09:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
10-30-2019 |
Time |
10:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-10-30 10:21:37 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | OCTOBER 28, 2019 SUBMITTAL REVIEW PACKAGE: | | | | | | 1. WEIR ELEVATIONS ARE HIGHER THAN PAVEMENT GRADE | | | ELEVATIONS. APPLICANT RESPONDED THAT THE EXFILTRATION | | | TRENCH IS DESIGN TO STORE THE RUNOFF FROM THE 10-YEAR | | | 1-DAY DESIGN STORM EVENT WITHOUT THE PARKING LOT | | | FLOODING. THE OVERFLOW WEIR ELEVATION FOR EACH PARKING | | | LOT WAS SET TO CONTAIN ONSITE THE RUNOFF FROM THE | | | 10-YEAR 3-DAY DESIGN STORM. | | | | | | OVER TIME THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE EXFILTRATION SYSTEMS | | | TO DISPOSE OF THE STORMWATER RUNOFF WILL DIMINISH TO | | | THE EXTENT THAT THE PARKING LOT WILL LIKELY FLOOD FOR | | | STORM EVENTS SMALLER THAN THE 10-YEAR 1-DAY DESIGN | | | STORM. THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE THAT THERE IS A | | | RISK OF THERE BEING 12 TO 17 INCHES OF STANDING WATER | | | IN THE PARKING LOTS DURING AND AFTER A STORM EVENT AND, | | | DEPENDING ON THE GROUNDWATER TABLE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF | | | THE EXFILTRATION TRENCHES, THE PARKING LOT(S) MAY BE | | | FLOODED FOR AN EXTENDED PERIOD OF TIME. | | | | | | IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THIS FLOOD RISK NOTICE BE | | | INCLUDED IN ANY USE LEASE AGREEMENTS WITH THIRD | | | PARTIES. | | | | | | 2. DRAINAGE SYSTEMS TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD | | | CRITERIA FOR STORMWATER QUALITY AND PEAK DISCHARGE FOR | | | PRE- VS POST-DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS. THERE IS A | | | MODIFIED EXFILTRATION TRENCH EQUATION WHEN (DS > DU) OR | | | (W > 2* [DU + DS]) | | | | | | 3. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES CONNECTED TO EXFILTRATION | | | TRENCHES SHALL HAVE POLLUTANT RETARDANT BAFFLES OVER | | | THE EXFILTRATION PIPE CONNECTION (WHETHER "UPSTREAM" OR | | | "DOWNSTREAM" OF THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH). | | | | | | 4. VERIFY DRAINAGE STRUCTURES ARE LARGE ENOUGH FOR THE | | | INSTALLATION OF MORE THAN ONE PRB OR PRB AND WEIR IN | | | THE STRUCTURES. | | | | | | 5. PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING DRAINAGE PIPES FROM | | | THE ALLEY TO THE CANAL. | | | | | | 6. SHOW AND LABEL THE PERIMETER BERM AND PROVIDE A | | | DETAIL/CROSS SECTION OF THE BERM. | | | | | | 7. CONFIRM IF STRUCTURE D-200 WILL CONNECT TO ONE OR | | | TWO EXISTING NORTH-SOUTH DRAINAGE PIPES RUNNING ACROSS | | | THE PROPERTY. TWO STORM LINES ARE SHOWN ON SHEET P-3. | | | | | | 8. SHOW ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS AND LANDSCAPE PLANS | | | THE PROPOSED EASEMENTS OVER THE EXISTING DRAINAGE PIPES | | | CROSSING THE PARKING LOTS AND OVER THE SANITARY SEWER | | | MAIN ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE. THE DRAINAGE | | | EASEMENTS WILL BE 10-FEET WIDE CENTERED ON THE PIPES. | | | IF MULTIPLE PIPES (SEE COMMENT NO. 7 ABOVE) THEN THE | | | EASEMENT WILL BE 15 FEET WIDE CENTERED BETWEEN THE | | | PIPES. THE UTILITY EASEMENT FOR THE SANITARY SEWER MAIN | | | WILL BE 5 FEET WIDE ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE WHERE | | | THE MAIN IS LOCATED. | | | | | | 9. ADDITIONAL ROOT BARRIERS WILL BE NEEDED (LANDSCAPE | | | PLANS) BETWEEN PROPOSED TREES AND THE EXISTING DRAINAGE | | | PIPES. | | | | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-08-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
10-08-2019 |
Time |
17:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
10-08-2019 |
Time |
17:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-10-08 17:10:40 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | SEPTEMBER 5, 2019 REVIEW SET OF PLANS: | | | | | | 1. SHOW AND LABEL THE PERIMETER BERM AND PROVIDE A | | | DETAIL/CROSS SECTION OF THE BERM. | | | | | | 2. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES CONNECTED TO EXFILTRATION | | | TRENCHES SHALL HAVE POLLUTANT RETARDANT BAFFLES OVER | | | THE EXFILTRATION PIPE (WHETHER "UPSTREAM" OR | | | "DOWNSTREAM" OF THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-13-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
08-01-2019 |
Time |
10:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
08-13-2019 |
Time |
23:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-08-13 23:23:58 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. | | | CONSTRUCTION LEVEL DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE | | | POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING | | | PERMIT APPLICATION PROCESSES. | | | | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEE | | | RING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. MISSING 1? 8? DIMENSION CALLOUT ON CWPB TYPICAL | | | PARKING STALL DETAIL ON SHEET SP-1. | | | | | | 2. WEIR ELEVATIONS ARE HIGHER THATN PAVEMENT GRADE | | | ELEVATIONS | | | | | | 3. IDENTIFY ON SHEETS P-3 AND P-4 WHICH EXFILTRATION | | | TRENCH DETAIL (2A, 2B, 2C) PERTAINS TO EACH OF THE | | | EXFILTRATION TRENCH SEGMENTS. | | | | | | 4. AT STRUCTURE D-205, PLACE WEIR ON THE WEST WALL AND | | | A PRB ON THE SOUTH WALL. | | | | | | 5. INDICATE IF THERE IS AN OUTFALL FOR BASIN 2C | | | EXFILTRATION TRENCH. | | | | | | 6. THERE IS A MODIFIED EXFILTRATION TRENCH EQUATION | | | WHEN (DS > DU) OR (W > 2* [DU + DS]). | | | | | | 7. VERIFY DRAINAGE STRUCTURES ARE LARGE ENOUGH FOR THE | | | INSTALLATION OF MORE THAN ONE PRB OR PRB AND WEIR IN | | | THE STRUCTURES. | | | | | | 8. PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING DRAINAGE PIPES FROM | | | THE ALLEY TO THE CANAL. | | | | | | 9. DRAINAGE SYSTEMS TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD | | | CRITERIA FOR STORMWATER QUALITY AND PEAK DISCHARGE FOR | | | PRE- VS POST-DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE | | | ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED | | | WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP PRIOR TO STARTING | | | CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
10-18-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
10-18-2019 |
Time |
09:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-10-18 09:20:53 | PASSED WITH CONDITIONS: | | | | | | 1. GRANT OF EASEMENTS FOR STORM WATER AND SANITARY | | | PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-08-13 08:23:42 | 1. CITY WILL REQUIRE EASEMENTS FOR EXISTING DRAINAGE | | | OUTFALLS CROSSING PROPERTY. | | | 2. A 5' EASEMENT ALONG THE ALLEY WILL BE REQUIRED FOR | | | EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE. | | | 3. ADJACENT ALLEY WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE MILLED AND | | | RESURFACED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
11-01-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-11-01 10:46:47 | PASSED, WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: | | | 1. THE PROPERTY OWNER AND PROJECT ENGINEER SHALL ASSESS | | | THE CONDITION OF THE ALLEY ADJACENT TO THE FOUR (4) | | | PARKING AREAS AND SUBMIT A PROPOSED RESTORATION SCOPE | | | FOR THOSE AREAS AT TIME OF ENGINEERING PERMIT REVIEW. | | | AT THE TIME OF PERMIT REVIEW, THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL | | | SUBMIT A PAVEMENT CORE REPORT ALONG THE ALLEY PREPARED | | | BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, AND COMMIT TO RESTORE | | | PORTIONS OF ALLEY PAVEMENT SECTIONS ABUTTING THE | | | PROJECT PARKING AREAS. THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL CONDUCT | | | A DETAILED REVIEW OF THE DRAINAGE CONDITION ALONG THE | | | ALLEY AND COMMIT TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE | | | IMPROVEMENT TO PREVENT DRAINAGE ACCUMULATION ON THE | | | PAVEMENT ALONG THE ALLEY SECTIONS ABUTTING THE PROJECT | | | PARKING AREAS AT THE PROPERTY OWNER'S COST. | | | 2. PROVIDE PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGNAGE ALONG AND AT | | | THE END OF THE ALLEY. STOP SIGNS AND STOP BARS SHOULD | | | BE PROVIDED AT THE EGRESS POINT; MARKED CROSSWALKS | | | SHOULD BE PROVIDED CROSSING THE ALLEY AT SPENCER DRIVE | | | AND CONGRESS AVENUE; DOUBLE YELLOW SHOULD BE PROVIDED | | | ALONG THE ALLEY WITH TWO 10-FOOT LANE; AND NO PARKING | | | SIGNS SHOULD BE POSTED ALONG THE ALLEY AT REGULAR | | | INTERVALS. | | | 3. PRIOR TO EACH OCCURRENCE OF POLE DELIVERY TRUCKS | | | ACCESSING THE SITE THROUGH THE SIDEWALK, PROPER PERMITS | | | SHOULD BE OBTAINED AND ALL PUBLIC PROPERTIES, SUCH AS | | | CURB, SIDEWALK, LANDSCAPE AND SIGNS, SHOULD BE | | | PROTECTED. ANY DAMAGE TO THE PUBLIC PROPERTIES CAUSED | | | BY POLE DELIVERY TRUCKS SHALL BE REPAIRED AND REPLACED | | | BY FPL. | | | | | | LINA M. CAMACHO | | | SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1129 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] | | | (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS) | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
09-18-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-09-18 12:05:38 | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | 1. BASED ON THE EXHIBITS PROVIDED, IT APPEARS THAT TWO | | | OUT OF THE FIVE EXISTING FPL PARKING LOTS ARE LEASED BY | | | 3RD PARTY COMPANIES NOT LOCATED ALONG THIS OKEECHOBEE | | | TRANSMISSION CORRIDOR. PLEASE JUSTIFY THE ASSUMPTION | | | THAT THE PARKING LOTS WOULD BE PREDOMINATELY LEASED BY | | | BUSINESSES ABUTTING THE ALLEY. | | | 2. PLEASE CLARIFY IF THE ESTIMATION OF 15 TRIPS PER DAY | | | IS REASONABLE. SINCE EACH VEHICLE SHUFFLE OR EMPLOYEE | | | OVERFLOW PARKING WOULD CREATE 2 TRIPS PER DAY, THERE | | | WOULD BE A MAXIMUM OF 7.5 VEHICLE SHUFFLES OR EMPLOYEE | | | OVERFLOW PARKING PER DAY. ALSO, IT IS UNKNOWN HOW MANY | | | LESSEES THERE MAY BE. IF THERE ARE 5 LESSEES, EACH | | | LESSEE WOULD HAVE ONLY 1 TO 2 VEHICLE SHUFFLE OR | | | EMPLOYEE OVER FLOW PARKING, WHICH APPEAR TO BE LOW | | | GIVEN THE SIZE OF THE BUSINESSES. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: | | | 1. THE PROPERTY OWNER AND PROJECT ENGINEER SHALL ASSESS | | | THE CONDITION OF THE ALLEY ADJACENT TO THE FOUR (4) | | | PARKING AREAS AND SUBMIT THE PROPOSED RESTORATION SCOPE | | | FOR THOSE AREAS AT TIME OF WPB ENGINEERING PERMIT | | | REVIEW. AT THE TIME OF PERMIT REVIEW, THE PROPERTY | | | OWNER SHALL SUBMIT A PAVEMENT CORE REPORT ALONG THE | | | ALLEY PREPARED BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, AND COMMIT | | | TO RESTORE THE PAVEMENT SECTION OF THE ALLEY. THE | | | PROPERTY OWNER SHALL CONDUCT A DETAILED REVIEW OF THE | | | DRAINAGE CONDITION ALONG THE ALLEY AND COMMIT TO | | | PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT TO PREVENT | | | DRAINAGE ACCUMULATION ON THE PAVEMENT ALONG THE ALLEY | | | AT THE PROPERTY OWNER'S COST. | | | 2. PROVIDE PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGNAGE ALONG AND AT | | | THE END OF THE ALLEY. STOP SIGNS AND STOP BARS SHOULD | | | BE PROVIDED AT THE EGRESS POINT; MARKED CROSSWALKS | | | SHOULD BE PROVIDED CROSSING THE ALLEY AT SPENCER DRIVE | | | AND CONGRESS AVENUE; DOUBLE YELLOW SHOULD BE PROVIDED | | | ALONG THE ALLEY WITH TWO 10-FOOT LANE; AND NO PARKING | | | SIGNS SHOULD BE POSTED ALONG THE ALLEY AT REGULAR | | | INTERVALS. | | | 3. PRIOR TO EACH OCCURRENCE OF POLE DELIVERY TRUCKS | | | ACCESSING THE SITE THROUGH THE SIDEWALK, PROPER PERMITS | | | SHOULD BE OBTAINED AND ALL PUBLIC PROPERTIES, SUCH AS | | | CURB, SIDEWALK, LANDSCAPE AND SIGNS, SHOULD BE | | | PROTECTED. ANY DAMAGE TO THE PUBLIC PROPERTIES CAUSED | | | BY POLE DELIVERY TRUCKS SHALL BE REPAIRED AND REPLACED | | | BY FPL. | | | | | | | | | LINA M. CAMACHO | | | SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1129 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] | | | (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS) | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
08-14-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-08-14 10:28:48 | TRAFFIC STATEMENT COMMENTS: | | | 1. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER. | | | 2. CLARIFY HOW THE PARKING LOTS WOULD BE USED, | | | INCLUDING THE EXPECTED USERS AND FREQUENCY OF TRAFFIC | | | MOVEMENTS INTO/OUT OF THE PARKING LOTS. | | | 3. DOCUMENT TRIP DISTRIBUTION ALONG AND CROSSING THE | | | ALLEY, SPENCER DRIVE, CONGRESS AVENUE, AND OKEECHOBEE | | | BOULEVARD, AS APPLICABLE. | | | 4. CONDUCT INTERSECTION OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS AT THE | | | ALLEY WITH SPENCER DRIVE AND CONGRESS AVENUE. | | | ADDITIONAL INTERSECTION ANALYSES MAY BE REQUIRED | | | DEPENDING ON THE INTENDED USERS OF THE PARKING LOT AND | | | THE NUMBER OF TRIPS GENERATED ON PUBLIC STREETS. | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | 5. PLEASE REBUILD FULL PAVEMENT SECTION OF THE ALLEY. | | | 6. SHOW AUTOTURN FOR ALL POTENTIAL LARGE TRUCK | | | MOVEMENTS IN THE PARKING LOTS. | | | 7. PROVIDE PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGNAGE ALONG AND AT | | | THE END OF THE ALLEY. STOP SIGNS AND STOP BARS SHOULD | | | BE PROVIDED AT THE EGRESS POINT; MARKED CROSSWALKS | | | SHOULD BE PROVIDED CROSSING THE ALLEY AT SPENCER DRIVE | | | AND CONGRESS AVENUE; DOUBLE YELLOW SHOULD BE PROVIDED | | | ALONG THE ALLEY WITH TWO 10-FOOT LANE; AND NO PARKING | | | SIGNS SHOULD BE POSTED ALONG THE ALLEY AT REGULAR | | | INTERVALS. | | | 8. CLARIFY THE DRAINAGE IMPACT TO THE ALLEY AFTER THE | | | PARKING LOT IS BUILT. PROVIDE DRAINAGE CALCULATION TO | | | COMPARE BEFORE AND AFTER CONDITIONS, AND IDENTIFY THE | | | DRAINAGE FACILITIES NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE THE RUNOFF IN | | | THE ALLEY. | | | | | | | | | LINA M. CAMACHO | | | SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1129 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] | | | (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS) | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
12-05-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
12-05-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
12-05-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-12-16 11:58:33 | SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: | | | | | | 1.) PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION. | | | | | | 2.) EASEMENTS SHALL BE GRANTED FOR STORMWATER AND | | | SANITARY SWWER LINES PRIOR TO THE CERTIFICATE OF | | | COMPLETION. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-18-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
11-18-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
11-18-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-11-18 11:17:04 | COMMENTS FOR THE PLANS RECEIVED 11/13/19 BY THE | | | PLANNING DIVISION: | | | | | | 1.) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL NOTED IN THE PLANS DOES NOT | | | REFLECT THE CONDITIONS APPROVED BY THE ZBA ON | | | 10/3/2019. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-04-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
11-04-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
11-04-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-11-04 16:24:52 | 1.) PLEASE ADDRESS IN THE "SITE DATA" TABULAR: EXISTING | | | LAND USE: COMMUNITY SERVICE (CS); EXISTING ZONING: | | | COMMUNITY SERVICE (CS) | | | | | | 2.) IN THE "REQUEST FOR WAIVERS" TABLE: TITLE OF THE | | | TABLE SHOULD BE "GRANTED WAIVERS" SINCE THE WAIVERS | | | WERE GRANTED BY THE ZBA ON 10/3/2019; REFERENCE ZBA | | | CASE NO. 3375 FOR THE CLASS B WITH WAIVERS; ELIMINATE | | | WAIVER #4, AS THE WAVIER DOES NOT APPLY TO THE PROJECT; | | | ADD THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. | | | | | | 3.) IN THE "REQUEST FOR VARIANCES" TABLE: TITLE OF THE | | | TABLE SHOULD BE "GRANTED VARIANCES" SINCE THE WAIVERS | | | WERE GRANTED BY THE ZBA ON 10/3/2019; REFERENCE ZBA | | | CASE NO. 3375A FOR THE VARIANCES; VARIANCE #2 SHOULD BE | | | REWORDED FOR CLARITY: VARIANCE FROM SECTION | | | 94-443(B)(2) TO ALLOW EACH LANDSCAPE BUFFER STRIP IN | | | PARKING AREAS 1, 3, AND 4 TO BE INTERRUPTED BY MORE | | | THAN 25% OF ITS REQUIRED LENGTH TO PROVIDE FOR | | | VEHICULAR INGRESS AND EGRESS; ADD THE CONDITIONS OF | | | APPROVAL. | | | | | | 4.) FOLLOWING NOTE SHALL BE ADDED TO THE "TYPICAL FENCE | | | DETAIL": BARBED WIRE STRANDS MUST BE MOUNTED AT AN | | | ANGLE PROJECTING INTERIOR TO THE PROPERTY PER ZLDR | | | S.94-302(C)(2). | | | | | | 5.) IN THE "PROPOSED PARKING NOTES": THE NOTE: "ALL | | | VEHICLE UNLOADING FROM SEMI TRAILERS WILL OCCUR IN | | | LEASEES SITES" SHALL BE REMOVED, AS IT HAS BEEN NOTED | | | (IN THE 8/28 APPLICANT?S RESPONSE LETTER TO PPRC), THAT | | | NO SEMI-TRUCKS WILL BE LOADING AND UNLOADING WITHIN THE | | | PROPOSED PARKING AREAS, AND THAT IT IS ANTICIPATED THAT | | | ALL VEHICLE OFFLOADING FROM CAR CARRIERS WILL WE DONE | | | ON DEALERSHIP PROPERTY. EITHER REMOVE THE NOTE OR | | | REWORD FOR CLARITY. | | | | | | 6.) DEFINE THE PARKING AREAS IN THE KEY MAP (I.E. | | | PARKING AREA #1, #2, #3 AND #4) | | | | | | 7.) CHECK THE ZBA STAFF REPORT TO ENSURE ALL PAST ZBA | | | CASES HAVE BEEN REFERENCED APPROPRIATELY IN THE SITE | | | PLAN. THERE SEEMS TO BE SOME INCONSISTENCY WITH THE ZBA | | | CASE NUMBERS AND APPROVAL DATES REFERENCED. | | | | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX | | | (6) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 INCHES X | | | 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 INCHES, AND | | | AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY | | | RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-12-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
08-12-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
08-12-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-08-12 16:34:41 | GENERAL COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) AN APPLICATION FOR A CLASS B SPECIAL USE PERMIT | | | (WITH WAIVERS) TO ALLOW THE PROJECT SITE FOR USE AS AN | | | OFF-SITE ACCESSORY PARKING LOT (REFERENCE: ZBA CASE NO. | | | 3375) AND AN APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE TO INCREASE THE | | | HEIGHT OF A PROPOSED FENCE WITHIN THE REQUIRED FRONT | | | SETBACK (REFERENCE: ZBA CASE NO. 3375A) HAVE BEEN | | | SUBMITTED CONCURRENTLY WITH THIS SITE PLAN APPLICATION. | | | THE APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN WILL BE CONTINGENT UPON | | | THE APPROVAL OF THE ZBA APPLICATIONS. | | | | | | 2.) A LANDSCAPE VARIANCE WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE | | | CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREE REQUIREMENT OF 75% FOR PARKING | | | LOT TREES. | | | | | | 3.) WHO ARE THE INTENDED USERS FOR THE PROPOSED PARKING | | | LOT? IT IS NOT CLEAR IN THE SITE PLAN JUSTIFICATION | | | STATEMENT. PLEASE REVISE THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT TO | | | CLEARLY STATE THE INTENDED USE. | | | | | | 4.) PLEASE CONSULT WITH THE CITY'S TRAFFIC ENGINEERS TO | | | DETERMINE IF THERE WILL BE ISSUES WITH TRAFFIC | | | CIRCULATION. | | | | | | | | | CLASS B SPECIAL USE PERMIT - SITE PLAN IMPROVEMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) THE PROPOSED WALL SHALL BE CONTIGUOUS ALONG THE | | | ENTIRE REAR PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 2.) TO REDUCE THE HEAT ISLAND EFFECT ASSOCIATED WITH | | | PARKING LOTS, THE APPLICANT SHALL IMPLEMENT COOL | | | PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY. | | | | | | 3.) THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE HEDGE AND TREES SHALL BE | | | MOVED TO THE OUTSIDE OF THE PERIMETER WALL/FENCE TO | | | PROVIDE FOR A MORE ATTRACTIVE SCREEN TO THE ADJACENT | | | USES. | | | | | | | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) PLAN MUST SHOW SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR ALL | | | PREVIOUSLY APPROVED IMPROVEMENTS. | | | | | | 2.) ALTHOUGH THERE IS A NOTE STATING THAT "ALL VEHICLE | | | UNLOADING FROM SEMI-TRAILERS WILL OCCUR ON THE LEASEES | | | SITES," A SEMI-TRUCK AUTO TURN PLAN IS REQUIRED TO | | | DETERMINE IF LOADING AND UNLOADING IS FEASIBLE WITHIN | | | THE PROJECT SITE UNDER THE PROPOSED CONFIGURATION FOR | | | EACH USER. | | | | | | 3.) NO MORE THAN THREE STANDS OF BARBED WIRE MAY BE | | | USED AT THE TOP OF THE FENCE. THE DETAIL ON SHEET SP-1 | | | ILLUSTRATES A TOTAL OF SIX STRANDS WHICH IS NOT | | | PERMITTED. [ZLDR S.94-302(C)(2)] | | | | | | 4.) ELIMINATE THE WHEEL STOPS AND CONVERT THE 18 FT. | | | DEEP PARKING SPACES TO 16 FT. DEEP WITH A 2 FT. | | | VEHICULAR CURB OVERHANG. THIS WILL INCREASE THE AMOUNT | | | OF LANDSCAPED/PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA WITHIN THE PROJECT. | | | | | | 5.) THE NUMBER OF ACCESS POINTS FOR EACH PARCEL SHALL | | | COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENT OF ZLDR S.94-312(1); | | | HOWEVER, AN ALTERNATIVE DESIGN MAY BE APPROVED BY THE | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DIRECTOR PER ZLDR S.94-312(3) IF | | | THE REQUIREMENT OF ZLDR S.94-312(1) IS PHYSICALLY | | | UNFEASIBLE. WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION FOR THE APPROVAL OF | | | THE ALTERNATIVE DESIGN BY THE ENGINEERING SERVICES | | | DIRECTOR OR DESIGNEE SHALL BE REQUIRED. | | | | | | 6.) PLEASE REFERENCE THE APPROVAL FOR THE EXISTING | | | PARKING LOT IDENTIFIED ON SHEET SP-2 AND SP-3 | | | ("EXISTING OFF-SITE PARKING LOT HYUNDAI"). | | | | | | 7.) RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENT: A PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY | | | CONNECTING SPENCER DRIVE AND CONGRESS AVENUE AT THE | | | REAR OF THE PROJECT SITE ALONG THE CANAL WITH | | | LANDSCAPING OUTSIDE OF THE REQUIRED WALL. | | | | | | | | | LIGHTING (PHOTMETRIC) PLAN: | | | | | | 1.) THE FOLLOWING NOTE SHALL BE ADDED IN THE | | | PHOTOMETRIC PLAN: "LIGHTING SHALL BE ARRANGED AS TO | | | REFLECT AWAY FROM ANY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT OR | | | ANY RESIDENTIAL USE SO AS NOT TO CAUSE ANY ANNOYING | | | GLARE TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY." | | | | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF | | | FIFTEEN (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 | | | INCHES X 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 | | | INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY | | | RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20 PERCENT ($200.00) OF THE ORIGINAL | | | APPLICATION FEE. | | | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE | | | QUESTIONS. | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |