Home Records and Reports Contractor Records Owner Records Permit Records Permit Reports Business Reports Property Records Business Tax My Account Code Enforcement Contact Us Log In/Out Print Plan Review Stops For Project Z19070006 Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) Rev No 2 Status F Date 08-14-2019 Cont ID   Sent By rbrown Date 08-14-2019 Time 11:49 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rbrown Date 08-14-2019 Time 11:49 Sent To   Notes 2019-08-14 12:23:26 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,   COMMENTS:       1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE   SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH   FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE   ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.       2. NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THE PARKING   DATA TABLE ON SITE PLAN SHEET C3.00 STATES THAT 6   ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES WILL BE PROVIDED, BUT THE   SUBMITTED LEVEL 1, LEVEL 2, AND LEVEL 3 PARKING PLANS   ONLY SHOW A TOTAL OF 2 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THE   MINIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED   SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 208.2 OF FLORIDA   ACCESSIBILITY CODE.       3. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. WHEN COMMENT   NO. 2 IS ADDRESSED, PLEASE NOTE THAT, PER SECTION 208.3   OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING   SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE   OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE   ENTRANCE. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL   COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE.       4. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. NO VAN ACCESSIBE   PARKING SPACES HAVE BEEN SHOWN ON THE SUBMITTED PLANS.   AT LEAST ONE OF THE PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE 6 ACCESSIBLE   PARKING SPACES SHALL BE VAN ACCESSSIBLE. PER SECTION   208.2.4 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX   REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING   STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND DESIGNED IN   ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY   CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT   SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE).       5. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,   THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR   THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,   AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE   FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.       6. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND   OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,   COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF   OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF   CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE   VERIFIED. PLEASE LOOK CLOSELY AT THE AREA OF GLAZING   (UNPROTECTED OPENINGS) FOR THE MICRO-UNITS ON THE WEST   SIDE OF THE BUILDING.       7. EXIT ACCESS VIA DEAD END CORRIDORS. THE SUBMITTED   SCHEMATIC FLOOR PLANS FOR LEVELS 4 THROUGH LEVEL 8 DO   NOT SHOW ANY DIMENSIONS, BUT THEY SHOW A DEAD END   CORRIDOR AS THE ONLY ACCESS TO THE STAIR WHEN EXITTING   THE AMENITIES AND THE MICRO-UNITS AT THE SOUTH END OF   THE BUILDING. PER SECTION 1020.4 AND TABLE 1006.2.1 OF   FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, BUILDING, DEAD END   CORRIDORS SHALL NOT EXCEED 50 FEET, AND COMMON PATH OF   TRAVEL SHALL NOT EXCEED 125 FEET. ALSO, THE LEVEL 8   INDOOR AMENITY AND OUTDOOR AMENITY SPACES ARE ASSUMED   TO BE ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY WITH AN OCCUPANCY RATE OF 7   SQUARE FEET PER PERSON OR 15 SQUARE FEET PER PERSON SO   THE NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS WILL BE GREATER SO EGRESS VIA A   SINGE DEAD END CORRIDOR MAY BE PROBLEMATIC.       8. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES   NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO   MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL   BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE   EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED   TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR   OTHER APPROVED METHODS.       9. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS   AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE   WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED   FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,   GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND   OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,   SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.       10. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND   CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF   CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL   NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.       11. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER   AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,   INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE   CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF   NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION   THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.       12. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT   WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL   HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT   MICHAEL ORIO, GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494   1080, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]       13. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT   TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE   ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP   ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC   PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:   [email protected]       ROBERT BROWN   BUILDING OFFICIAL   TEL: 561 805 6652   EMAIL: [email protected]     Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By rbrown Date 08-14-2019 Time 11:48 Sent To   Notes 2019-08-14 11:52:38 THE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS ENTERED UNDER THIS BUILDING   REVIEW ARE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS ENTERED UNDER   THE WRONG REVIEW DISCIPLINE. BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS   WILL BE ENTERED UNDER BUILDING REVIEW (REVISION) NO. 2         2019-08-14 10:21:08 1. REQUIRED BUILDING SETBACKS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO   INCLUDE FEATURES SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,   SIDEWALKS, STREET TREES, TREE GRATES, LANDSCAPE BUFFERS   AND LIGHTING AS APPROVED BY THE CITY TO SUPPORT THE   PARTICULAR DISTRICT CHARACTER. THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL   REQUIRE ROW IMPROVEMENTS TO ALL ROW INCLUDING OLIVE   STREET. THE APPLICANT SHALL WORK WITH THE PLANNING   DEPARTMENT ON THE DESIGN OF THE STREETSCAPE TO INCLUDE   PLANTER BEDS, REPLACE PAVERS AS NEEDED TO MATCH THE   EXISTING, AND FIX THE SIDEWALK AS NECESSARY. THE   EXISTING CURB CUT ALONG OLIVE STREET SHALL BE REMOVED.   2. AS THE PARKING CALCULATIONS ARE INCORRECT (SEE LATER   COMMENTS), STAFF RECOMMENDS THE REORIENTATION OF THE   PARKING GARAGE TO REMOVE THE COVERED PORTION OF THE   BUILDING ENTRY AT OLIVE STREET AND TRINITY PLACE. THE   AREA CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARDS OPEN SPACE IF IT IS   FULLY COVERED. ADDITIONALLY, THIS WOULD ALLOW FOR THE   RELOCATION OF THE LARGE OAK TREE ON SITE INTO THIS   CORNER SPACE. THE COVERED SPACE DIMINISHES THE   APPEARANCE OF THE SIDEWALK BEING FOR PUBLIC USE.   3. EXISTING STREET LIGHT POLES SHALL BE REPLACED WITH   THE CITY APPROVED LIGHT POLE, PER CITY ENGINEERING   REQUIREMENTS.   4. PLEASE PROVIDE PHOTOMETRICS FOR THE SITE AND ROW   MEETING REQUIREMENT OF SECTION 94-113(B). PLEASE   INCLUDE LIGHT POLE DETAILS FOR BOTH INTERNAL AND ROW   LIGHT POLES.   5. SIDEWALK MUST BE AT GRADE INCLUDING ACROSS PARKING   INGRESS/EGRESS AREAS. IT APPEARS THERE ARE ISSUES AT   THE GARAGE ENTRANCES THAT REQUIRE CURBING AND STAIRS.   THIS WILL NEED TO BE ADJUSTED TO KEEP THE GRADE LEVEL.   6. THE SIDEWALK DOES NOT APPEAR TO MEET THE REQUIRED   EIGHT FEET PATH ADJACENT TO THE PARALLEL PARKING SPOTS   ALONG OLIVE AVENUE WITH THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE BEDS.   PLEASE ADJUST AS NECESSARY.   7. PLEASE USE PLANTER BEDS FOR STREET TREES RATHER THAN   USING TREE GRATES. TREE GRATES ARE ONLY NECESSARY IF   THE MINIMUM EIGHT FOOT PATHWAY CLEARANCE CANNOT BE MET   AND THE GRATES ARE NECESSARY TO WIDEN THE WALKING PATH.   A BREAK IN THE PLANTER BEDS CAN BE USED TO MAINTAIN   PAVER DESIGN. SEE LANDSCAPE COMMENTS FOR SPECIFIC   LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS.   8. THERE ARE STAIRS PROPOSED WITHIN THE REQUIRED   SETBACK ALONG TRINITY PLACE AND TANGLEWOOD COURT.   STAIRS CANNOT BE LOCATED WITHIN THE REQUIRED SETBACK.   9. STAFF HAS CONCERN WITH THE PROPOSED RAMPS INTO THE   BUILDING FROM THE PUBLIC ROW. THE RAMPS SEPARATE THE   ACTIVE USE FROM THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK. THE GRADE   DIFFERENCES SHOULD BE OBSERVED INSIDE THE BUILDING. THE   RAMPS ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE RENDERINGS.   10. PLEASE CONSIDER ADDITIONAL FOUNDATION LANDSCAPE   ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING ALONG OLIVER STREET (SEE   COMMENT 9 FOR REMOVAL OF RAMPS).   11. IT APPEARS THAT DOORWAYS OPEN OUT DIRECTLY INTO   STAIRWAYS. THESE DOORWAYS WOULD NEED TO BE RECESSED IF   THE DOORS OPEN OUTWARDS. PLEASE ADJUST AS NECESSARY.   12. PLEASE INCLUDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE SIDEWALK ON   THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.   13. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAIL OF THE WALK UP GARDENS   INCLUDING THE LOCATION OF STAIRS. PLEASE SEE SECTION   94-109 FOR DEFINITION AND REQUIREMENTS OF WALK-UP   GARDENS.   14. PLEASE ADD LOT FRONTAGE DIMENSIONS TO THE SITE   PLAN.   15. PLEASE SHOW PROPOSED LOCATION OF BACKFLOW PREVENTER   AND TRANSFORMER AND OTHER ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES.   PLEASE NOTE, LOCATION OF THESE UTILITIES SHALL REQUIRE   COORDINATION WITH ENGINEERING, PUBLIC UTILITIES, AND   PLANNING AND ZONING TO ENSURE LOCATION THAT DOES NOT   IMPEDE THE PUBLIC REALM AND THAT ALL UTILITIES ARE   PROPERLY SCREENED.   16. PLEASE FIX THE PROPERTY LINE AT THE SITE?S   NORTHWEST CORNER.   17. PLEASE REDUCE INGRESS/EGRESS POINTS TO 20 FEET   MAXIMUM INTERNALLY AND A MAXIMUM OF 25 FEET AT THE CURB   CUT. SEE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING COMMENTS FOR TRAFFIC   CIRCULATION.   18. PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS AND DETAILS OF EACH FLOOR   PLAN INCLUDING SETBACKS.   19. PLEASE PROVIDE OUTLINE OF UPPER FLOORS ON THE BASE   SITE PLAN AND INDICATE SETBACKS.   20. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE SHEET INDICATING THE   LOCATION OF ACTIVE USE AND PERCENTAGE ALONG THE   FACADES. STAFF CAN PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE.   21. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE SHEET INDICATING THE   LOCATION OF REQUIRED TRANSPARENCY PERCENTAGE ALONG THE   FACADES. TRANSPARENCY IS DEFINED IN SECTION 94-109.   STAFF CAN PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE.   22. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE SHEET WITH A BREAKDOWN OF   FAR CALCULATION PER FLOOR (SEE DEFINITION OF GROSS   SQUARE FEET FOR FAR CALCULATION IN SECTION 94-109).   STAFF CAN PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE.   23. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE SHEET INDICATING THE   REQUIRED PLANAR BREAKS FOR TABLE IV-4 ALONG THE   FACADES. STAFF CAN PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE.   24. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE SHEET INDICATING THE   REQUIRED HORIZONTAL PROJECTIONS FOR TABLE IV-4 ALONG   THE FACADES. STAFF CAN PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE.   25. THE CALCULATION FOR REQUIRED PARKING FOR   MICRO-UNITS, STANDARD UNITS, AND RETAIL/COMMERCIAL ARE   INCORRECT. THE PERMITTED PARKING FOR MICROUNITS IS 102   SPACES FOR UNITS AND 10 SPACES FOR GUESTS FOR A TOTAL   OF 112 SPACES (ADJUST IN REQUIRED COLUMN). THE   PERMITTED PARKING FOR STANDARD SPACES IS MIN. 14 AND   MAX. 28 PLUS 1 SPACE FOR GUEST FOR A TOTAL OF 29   SPACES. THE PERMITTED PARKING FOR RETAIL IS MIN. 12 AND   MAX. 24 (ROUNDED DOWN). PLEASE AMEND ACCORDINGLY AND   NOTE THAT ANY PARKING SPACES ABOVE MAXIMUM PARKING   SHALL COUNT TOWARDS FAR. THE NUMBER OF SPACES ARE ONLY   ROUNDED UP IF DECIMAL POINT IS EQUAL TO OR ABOVE 0.5.   26. PLEASE INDICATE LOCATION FOR THE GUEST PARKING ON   THE SITE PLANS.   27. PLEASE INDICATE WHAT THE ?SC? LABEL MEANS IN THE   PARKING GARAGE. IF COMPACT SPACES, PLEASE INCLUDE   CALCULATION OF PERCENTAGE OF COMPACT SPACES IN DATA   TABLE MEETING REQUIREMENT OF 94-485 (N)(1). 30% OF   SPACES CAN BE COMPACT FOR PARKING REQUIREMENTS OVER 100   SPACES.   28. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE BIKE SHARE   STATION ON THE SITE PLAN. EFFORTS CAN BE COORDINATED   WITH THE CITY?S CURRENT BIKE SHARE PROGRAM. THE TOTAL   NUMBER OF DOCKS REQUIRED WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE   PROXIMITY OF OTHER BIKE SHARING STATIONS ALREADY   INSTALLED WITHIN 500 FEET FROM THE SUBJECT PROJECT.   29. THE MAXIMUM SF OF MICRO UNITS IS 549 SF. PLEASE BE   SURE TO PLAN FOR THE CONFIGURATION AND LAYOUT OF THE   UNITS AS THIS WOULD IMPACT THE LOCATION OF WINDOWS AND   OTHER FEATURES.   30. PER SECTION 94-106(8A), THE REQUIRED BICYCLE   PARKING FOR THE RESIDENTIAL MICRO-UNITS SHALL BE 0.5   BICYCLE PARKING SPACES PER MICRO-UNIT, WHICH WOULD BE   102 SPACES FOR THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY.   THIS SHALL REQUIRE A COVERED AND ENCLOSED BICYCLE   STORAGE AREA.   31. THE CALCULATION FOR REQUIRED CAR SHARE IS   INCORRECT. THE CALCULATION SHALL BE A RATIO OF ONE CAR   SHARE SPACE PER EVERY 13 UNITS, REDUCED BY ONE CAR   SHARE SPACE PER EVERY 13 ON-SITE MICRO-UNIT PARKING   SPACES PROVIDED. THIS WOULD RESULT IN 8 CAR SHARE   SPACES. PLEASE PROVIDE 2 SPACES ON SITE, AND HAVE THE   REMAINING 6 TO BE SAVED FOR CAR SHARE FOR A FUTURE DATE   BASED ON THE REQUIREMENTS OF 94-106(8A). PLEASE AMEND   TO SHOW THE REQUIRED 2 SPACES PLUS 6 RESERVED SPACES   (WHICH CAN BE USED FOR GUEST PARKING NOW) IN THE   PROJECT DATA TABLE AND SHOW LOCATION OF CAR SHARE   SPACES ON THE SITE PLANS. APPLICANT SHALL COORDINATE   WITH CAR SHARE PROVIDER WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF THE   CITY.   32. STAFF HAS CONCERN WITH THE CRUNCH POINTS OF THE   PARKING GARAGE RAMPS, WHERE THE TWO RAMPS MEET ON THE   SECOND STORY. PLEASE EVALUATE AS THE DRIVE AISLE OF THE   SPEED RAMPS APPEARS TO ALSO BE INCLUDED IN THE DRIVE   AISLE FOR THE SECOND STORY RAMP.   33. PER SECTION 94-111, THE EQUIVALENT OF ONE PARKING   SPACE SHALL BE REQUIRED AT THE TERMINUS OF A DEAD-END   AISLE, AND STRIPED AS A DEDICATED PULL-IN AREA FOR   TURNING AROUND. PLEASE INCLUDE AS NECESSARY IN PARKING   GARAGE.   34. PLEASE COORDINATE TRASH PICKUP AND REMOVAL WITH   PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. HOW WOULD PICKUP WORK FOR THE   PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE ENCLOSURE? PLEASE COORDINATE   WITH MATT HEJAZI. 561-822-2045 [email protected]   35. IS THERE ACCESS TO THE RETAIL FROM THE PARKING   GARAGE? HOW WILL ACCESS WORK? PLEASE LABEL PARKING   SPACES FOR RETAIL ON THE SITE PLAN.   36. PUBLIC BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ONE   SPACE PER 100 FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE. THIS WOULD BE   THE TOTAL OF ALL THREE STREET FRONTAGES FOR A TOTAL OF   6 BICYCLE SPACES (SECTION 93-113)   37. THE REQUIRED WIDTH OF PARKING SPACES IS 8?6? FOR 0   DEGREE ANGLE PARKING. PLEASE ADJUST ACCORDINGLY.   38. ALL SIGNS ARE REVIEWED AT TIME OF BUILDING SIGN   PERMIT. PLEASE MAKE NOTE ON ELEVATIONS THAT SIGNS SHALL   REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMIT AND FOLLOW THE REGULATIONS OF   SECTION 94-110   39. PLEASE PROVIDE SPECIFIC ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL   INCLUDING ALL MATERIALS AND INCLUDE REFERENCE IMAGES.   STAFF HAS CONCERN OVER THE MATERIAL FOR THE GARAGE   SCREENING AND NEEDS TO SEE MORE DETAIL OF THE SPACING   OF THE FEATURES, PROPOSED MATERIAL, ETC.   40. PLEASE CONSIDER ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES OTHER THAN   GARAGE SCREENING ON THE PARKING GARAGE FA?ADE TO BETTER   BLEND THE OBVIOUS FACADE OF PARKING GARAGE SCREENING AS   SEEN FROM THE PUBLIC VIEW, ESPECIALLY FROM OLIVE AVENUE   AND TRINITY PLACE, WHILE KEEPING THE MASSING DIFFERENT   INTACT.   41. PLEASE PROVIDE BUILDING SECTIONS.   42. THE PARKING GARAGE RAMPS SHALL BE COVERED WITH   ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT. BLANK WALLS ARE NOT PERMITTED   PER SECTION 94-109. NON-ACTIVE USES SHALL BE TREATED   WITH ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT PER TABLE IV-4.   43. PLEASE PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE SIDE   INTERIOR SETBACK AND THE SETBACK BEHIND THE SURFACE   PARKING LOT ON TRINITY PLACE TO SCREEN BLANK FACADES.   THIS DOES NOT COUNT TOWARDS ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT OF   NON-ACTIVE USES.   44. PLEASE EXTEND ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT ALONG THE   FA?ADE AREA ADJACENT TO THE PARKING GARAGE ALONG OLIVE   STREET TO ALLEVIATE THE BLANK WALL.   45. PLEASE NOTE, PER RESOLUTION 211-17, PROJECTS WITH   RESIDENTIAL MICRO-UNITS SHALL CONTRIBUTE A TROLLEY FEE   AT $10 PER MICRO-UNIT PER MONTH.   46. HAS THE INCLUSION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS BEEN   CONSIDERED FOR THE BUILDING?   47. PLEASE ELABORATE ON THE PROVIDED AMENITY SPACE.   STAFF SUGGESTS THE CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONAL   AMENITIES FOR THE BUILDING AS THE LIVING AREAS ARE   SMALLER THAN STANDARD UNITS.       FOLLOW UP MEETING RECOMMENDED TO DISCUSS SITE DESIGN.   PLEASE COORDINATE WITH PLANNER           LIZ LEVESQUE, URBAN DESIGN PLANNER   [email protected]   561 822 1426     Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 4 Status P Date 03-17-2020 Cont ID   Sent By rrossano Date 03-17-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By rrossano Date 03-17-2020 Time   Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 3 Status F Date 02-25-2020 Cont ID   Sent By rrossano Date 02-25-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By rrossano Date 02-25-2020 Time   Sent To   Notes 2020-02-25 08:26:33 PLEASE ADD SANITARY CLEANOUT NEAR PROPERTY LINE ON   SOUTH SIDE OF PROJECT FOR PROPOSED SANITARY CONNECTION.       PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING   COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE   SUPERVISOR, CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES   ([email protected], OR 561-822-2262) - COMMENTS   ORIGINALLY SENT ON 12/3/19, SOME MAY HAVE BEEN   ADDRESSED:       -U.E. IS CUTTING OFF SOME OF THE DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE   PIPING. SHOULD BE EXTENDED EAST TO INCLUDE THE N-S   PIPING. THAT N-S PIPING SHOULD ALSO HAVING LABEL WITH   PIPE SIZE AND TYPE.   -THE PREFERRED LARGE METER INSTALLATION IS THE   ABOVE-GROUND VARIANT IN CONJUNCTION WITH WS-8 FOR   INCREASED SAFETY, COST REDUCTION, AND EASE OF   MAINTENANCE. SHOULD BE CHANGED TO ABOVE-GROUND INSTALL   INSTEAD OF VAULT. THIS WOULD LIKELY ALSO ALLOW   ELIMINATION OF 45S BETWEEN METER AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY   IF BYPASS IS PUT ON SOUTHERN SIDE AND METER ON NORTHERN   SIDE.   -THE PICTURE SHOWS PARALLEL DOMESTIC BACKFLOW   ASSEMBLIES, WHICH IS GOOD. IF THAT IS AS INTENDED,   SHOULD UPDATE LABEL TO MENTION PARALLEL ASSEMBLIES.   -NOT SURE IF THE CIRCLE ICON ADJACENT EAST SIDE OF   WATER METER IS A TREE. IF SO, IT IS TOO CLOSE TO THE   PIPING. TREE SHOULD BE RELOCATED EAST APPROXIMATELY 5   FEET AND N-S ROOT BARRIER PLACED IN BETWEEN TREE AND   PIPING.   -IT LOOKS LIKE THE WATER SERVICES ARE CROSSING AND   MULTIPLE FPL UTILITIES. PLAN SHOULD HAVE NOTATION ON   HOW THIS CONFLICT IS RESOLVED. FOR EXAMPLE IS THE FPL   BEING RELOCATED, OR DO THEY CROSS UNDER/OVER EACH   OTHER.   -THE WATER UTILITIES AND UE LOOK TO BE IN A 12 FT. E-W   PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT. I AM NOT KNOWLEDGEABLE ON   PEDESTRIAN EASEMENTS. PROJECT TEAM SHOULD VERIFY THAT   IT IS ALRIGHT AND NOT PROBLEMATIC.   -PAVEMENT RESTORATION JUST SHOWED HALF THE STREET, BUT   EXISTING STREET LOOKS MORE LIKE A SINGLE LANE. PROJECT   TEAM NEEDS TO VERIFY IF ALLOWED TO RESTORE LIKE THAT OR   MUST RESURFACE ENTIRE WIDTH OF ROAD.   -THERE IS AN EXISTING SMALL METERED WATER SERVICE ON   THE EAST SIDE OF PROPERTY NEAR THE CENTER ON OLIVE.   SHOULD BE DRAWN AND LABELED ON PLAN ALONG WITH WHAT   WILL BE HAPPENING TO IT (REMOVED/CUT-BACK, CONTINUE   USING FOR IRRIGATION, ETC?). CURRENTLY SHOW IT AS AN   ACTIVE IRRIGATION WATER SERVICE FOR THE PROPERTY.   -PROPOSED SS CROSSES WATER MAIN WHICH IS CONFLICT, BUT   PLAN DOES NOT SAY HOW CONFLICT IS RESOLVED. SHOULD BE   LABELED WITH HOW CONFLICT IS RESOLVED. PREFERABLY SHOW   WATER MAIN FEW FEET ABOVE SS.   -FIRE HYDRANT AT NE CORNER OF PROPERTY NOT SHOWING UE   AROUND IT. IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS ON THE PRIVATE PROPERTY.       FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR   CONCERNS, THANKS.   RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 3366, WPB FL   33402   DIRECT: (561) 494-1098, FAX: (561) 494-1116 MOBILE:   (561) 246-9525   EMAIL: [email protected] WWW.WPB.ORG/     Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 2 Status F Date 11-27-2019 Cont ID   Sent By rrossano Date 11-27-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date 11-27-2019 Time   Sent To   Notes 2019-11-27 10:27:32 PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND   STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG SEGMENTS WHERE YOU ARE   CONNECTING. (PPRC REQUIREMENT).   8 INCH CONNECTION TO EXISTING CITY SANITARY SEWER SHALL   BE MADE VIA A NEW DOGHOUSE STYLE MANHOLE.   FOR THE ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, CITY ENGINEERING   SERVICES SUGGESTS ADDING IRRIGATION METER (WATER ONLY)   TO ENGINEERING PLANS.           THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE UPLOADED ON 12/3/19 FOR   MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, CITY OF   WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES. CONTACT [email protected], OR   561-822-2262.       -U.E. IS CUTTING OFF SOME OF THE DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE   PIPING. SHOULD BE EXTENDED EAST TO INCLUDE THE N-S   PIPING. THAT N-S PIPING SHOULD ALSO HAVING LABEL WITH   PIPE SIZE AND TYPE.   -THE PREFERRED LARGE METER INSTALLATION IS THE   ABOVE-GROUND VARIANT IN CONJUNCTION WITH WS-8 FOR   INCREASED SAFETY, COST REDUCTION, AND EASE OF   MAINTENANCE. SHOULD BE CHANGED TO ABOVE-GROUND INSTALL   INSTEAD OF VAULT. THIS WOULD LIKELY ALSO ALLOW   ELIMINATION OF 45?S BETWEEN METER AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY   IF BYPASS IS PUT ON SOUTHERN SIDE AND METER ON NORTHERN   SIDE.   -THE PICTURE SHOWS PARALLEL DOMESTIC BACKFLOW   ASSEMBLIES, WHICH IS GOOD. IF THAT IS AS INTENDED,   SHOULD UPDATE LABEL TO MENTION PARALLEL ASSEMBLIES.   -NOT SURE IF THE CIRCLE ICON ADJACENT EAST SIDE OF   WATER METER IS A TREE. IF SO, IT IS TOO CLOSE TO THE   PIPING. TREE SHOULD BE RELOCATED EAST APPROXIMATELY 5   FEET AND N-S ROOT BARRIER PLACED IN BETWEEN TREE AND   PIPING.   -IT LOOKS LIKE THE WATER SERVICES ARE CROSSING AND   MULTIPLE FPL UTILITIES. PLAN SHOULD HAVE NOTATION ON   HOW THIS CONFLICT IS RESOLVED. FOR EXAMPLE IS THE FPL   BEING RELOCATED, OR DO THEY CROSS UNDER/OVER EACH   OTHER.   -THE WATER UTILITIES AND UE LOOK TO BE IN A 12? E-W   PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT. I AM NOT KNOWLEDGEABLE ON   PEDESTRIAN EASEMENTS. PROJECT TEAM SHOULD VERIFY THAT   IT IS ALRIGHT AND NOT PROBLEMATIC.   -PAVEMENT RESTORATION JUST SHOWED HALF THE STREET, BUT   EXISTING STREET LOOKS MORE LIKE A SINGLE LANE. PROJECT   TEAM NEEDS TO VERIFY IF ALLOWED TO RESTORE LIKE THAT OR   MUST RESURFACE ENTIRE WIDTH OF ROAD.   -THERE IS AN EXISTING SMALL METERED WATER SERVICE ON   THE EAST SIDE OF PROPERTY NEAR THE CENTER ON OLIVE.   SHOULD BE DRAWN AND LABELED ON PLAN ALONG WITH WHAT   WILL BE HAPPENING TO IT (REMOVED/CUT-BACK, CONTINUE   USING FOR IRRIGATION, ETC?). CURRENTLY SHOW IT AS AN   ACTIVE IRRIGATION WATER SERVICE FOR THE PROPERTY.   -PROPOSED SS CROSSES WATER MAIN WHICH IS CONFLICT, BUT   PLAN NOT SAY HOW CONFLICT IS RESOLVED. SHOULD BE   LABELED WITH HOW CONFLICT IS RESOLVED. PREFERABLY WATER   MAIN FEW FEET ABOVE SS.   -FIRE HYDRANT AT NE CORNER OF PROPERTY NOT SHOWING UE   AROUND IT -> LOOKS LIKE IT ON THE PRIVATE PROPERTY.   FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR   CONCERNS, THANKS.       RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 3366, WPB FL   33402   DIRECT: (561) 494-1098, FAX: (561) 494-1116 MOBILE:   (561) 246-9525   EMAIL: [email protected] WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING         Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-07-2019 Cont ID   Sent By rrossano Date 08-07-2019 Time   Rev Time   Received By rrossano Date 08-07-2019 Time   Sent To   Notes 2019-07-31 13:22:49 THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF REGULATIONS   AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY AFFECT THE   DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND WASTEWATER   UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE DEVELOPMENT   PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK BELOW:   HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WPB_W   EBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FULL-P   ACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97B19   60045731D3658206F27451722716EF   THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE   FOUND HERE:   HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR   MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS       CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA,   CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08, ADOPTED SEPT. 22,   2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)   CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL, SEC. 90-7.   POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER SERVICE   FACILITIES OF THE CITY.   THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE   CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY   BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,   BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.   PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER ALONG   ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE.   PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY OF   WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT   OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF YOUR   PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE   MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL   IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT   [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER   ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION   ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD   SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.   AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH   CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,   STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR   MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:   HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI   CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL   PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF   ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES,   INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND   SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES,   METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE   SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING   GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS,   ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL   INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER   LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE   PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN   VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.   ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND   PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER   OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &   TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE   RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL   UTILITY CROSSINGS.   CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY   ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY   RIGHT OF WAY.   PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE   DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB   DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION).   PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND   IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED   AREAS.   PROVIDE UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY   PERSONNEL TO PROPOSED UTILITIES INCLUDING WATER METERS.   PROVIDE ADDRESS ON COVER SHEET.   ON DEMOLITION PLAN, SHOW SILT FENCE, INLET PROTECTION,   CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAILS, BEST MANAGEMENT   PRACTICES, ETC.       ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER   SERVICE SUPERVISOR, PUBLIC UTILITIES, CITY OF WEST PALM   BEACH, 561-822-2262, [email protected]:   -THE 3 INCH DOMESTIC METER LOOKS LIKE IT MAY BE LOCATED   INSIDE OF A BUILDING -> CANNOT BE LOCATED IN A   BUILDING. THE DOMESTIC RP BACKFLOW CANNOT BE LOCATED   INSIDE OF A BUILDING EITHER. ALSO LOOKS LIKE IT MIGHT   BE IN A FOOT TRAFFIC PATH -> LIKE METER AWAY FROM FOOT   TRAFFIC. CUSTOMER SHOULD INVESTIGATE ALTERNATE   LOCATIONS SUCH AS EAST OR NORTH SIDE OF PROPERTY, AND   CONSTRUCTING SMALL GRASS AREA FOR METER AND BACKFLOW.   -UTILITIES DOES NOT WANT FIRE BACKFLOW INSIDE BUILDING   UNLESS FIRE DEPT REQUIRES IT -> IF SO, THEN WOULD NEED   BACKFLOW COVENANT COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED. DCDA TYPE   ONLY APPROVED IF NO CHEMICALS ADDED IN DOWNSTREAM FIRE   PIPING.   -WATER SERVICES LOOK TO BE RUNNING ON PRIVATE PROPERTY.   WOULD NEED UTILITY EASEMENTS CREATED FOR ALL THE   DOMESTIC PORTION INCLUDING WATER METER. FOR THE FIRE   PORTION, POINT OF SERVICE VALVE NOT MARKED (USUALLY IS   JUST BEFORE PROPERTY LINE). CITY WATER SERVICE PIPING   LENGTH IS NOT MINIMIZED -> EXTENDS FAR ON PROPERTY AND   LOOKS LIKE IT MAY BE IN A ROAD -> WHICH WOULD SHUT DOWN   THAT ENTRANCE/EXIT IN THE EVENT OF REPAIR WORK.   -METER DOES NOT SAY IF IT IS ABOVE-GROUND OR   UNDERGROUND -> FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE PREFERS ABOVE   GROUND FOR EMPLOYEE SAFETY AND COST REDUCTION WITH NO   VAULT TO MAINTAIN.   -CUSTOMER SHOULD CONSIDER PARALLEL BACKFLOW PREVENTER   SETUP FOR DOMESTIC WATER SO THAT IF DOING MAINTENANCE   ON BACKFLOW ALL THE DWELLINGS AND STORES DO NOT LOSE   WATER.           FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR   CONCERNS, THANKS.   RICK ROSSANO   PROJECT COORDINATOR   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT   401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR   WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401   (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402)   MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200   DIRECT: (561) 494-1098   FAX: (561) 494-1116   MOBILE: (561) 246-9525   EMAIL: [email protected]   WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING       MANNY GONZALEZ   SENIOR ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT   401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR   WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401   (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402)   MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200   DIRECT: (561) 494-1085   FAX: (561) 494-1116   MOBILE: (561) 644-7301   EMAIL: [email protected]   WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING                             Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT Rev No 1 Status P Date 08-01-2019 Cont ID   Sent By pleduc Date 08-01-2019 Time 13:57 Rev Time 0.00 Received By pleduc Date 08-01-2019 Time 13:31 Sent To   Notes 2019-08-01 13:57:22 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,   FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM   BEACH FIRE RESCUE.       THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE   DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.   ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS   ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.       THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE   PROPOSED PROJECT.       1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY   WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE   PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A   PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED   TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN   STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY   MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER   PROTECTION.       2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY   IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING   ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. GATES SHALL BE A MINIMUM   20' FIRE LANE ACCESS WIDTH FOR FD APPARATUS. KNOX   PADLOCKS ARE RECOMMENDED ON ALL GATES.       3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM   ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.   ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND   AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT   WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.       4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE   REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE   ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.       5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH   THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,   INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.       6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE   OCCUPANCY TYPE, PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,   AND WHETHER IT IS MIXED OR SEPARATED OCCUPANCY.       6A) FOR PLAN REVIEW PURPOSES PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS   INDICATING WHETHER IT IS A HIGH RISE OR NOT?       HIGH-RISE BUILDING. A BUILDING WHERE THE FLOOR OF AN   OCCUPIABLE STORY IS GREATER THAN 75 FT (23 M) ABOVE THE   LOWEST LEVEL OF FIRE DEPARTMENT VEHICLE ACCESS.       6B) TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED.       NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY   RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.   11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM   RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT   COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL   DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.   NFPA 72, 24.5.2* TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS   ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS.   24.5.2.2 RADIO COVERAGE. RADIO COVERAGE SHALL BE   PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE BUILDING AS A PERCENTAGE OF   FLOOR AREA AS SPECIFIED IN 24.5.2.2.1 THROUGH   24.5.2.2.3.   24.5.2.2.1 CRITICAL AREAS. CRITICAL AREAS, SUCH AS THE   EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER(S), THE FIRE PUMP ROOM(S),   EXIT STAIRS, EXIT PASSAGEWAYS, ELEVATOR LOBBIES,   STANDPIPE CABINETS, SPRINKLER SECTIONAL VALVE   LOCATIONS, AND OTHER AREAS DEEMED CRITICAL BY THE   AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH   99 PERCENT FLOOR AREA RADIO COVERAGE.   24.5.2.2.2 GENERAL BUILDING AREAS. GENERAL BUILDING   AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH 90 PERCENT FLOOR AREA   RADIO COVERAGE.   24.5.2.3 SIGNAL STRENGTH.   24.5.2.3.1 INBOUND. A MINIMUM INBOUND SIGNAL STRENGTH   OF -95 DBM, OR OTHER SIGNAL STRENGTH AS REQUIRED BY THE   AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL BE PROVIDED   THROUGHOUT THE COVERAGE AREA.   24.5.2.3.2 OUTBOUND. A MINIMUM OUTBOUND SIGNAL STRENGTH   OF -95 DBM AT THE DONOR SITE, OR OTHER SIGNAL STRENGTH   AS REQUIRED BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL   BE PROVIDED FROM THE COVERAGE AREA.       THE SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL   STRENGTH OF -95 DBM FOR THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST   PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE. TESTING SHALL BE BY AN   ACCEPTABLE NATIONAL STANDARD DOCUMENTING PERCENTAGES   NOTED ABOVE AND BY ACTUAL RADIO TESTING BY FIRE   PERSONNEL. IF THE MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A   BI-DIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH   A MINIMUM 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP.       7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE   LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER   SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED.       8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS   DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED   ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF   FIRE PREVENTION. TWO EXISTING HYDRANT ARE INDICATED AND   ACCEPTABLE.       ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS   DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE   BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND   FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED WITHIN 100' OF EACH OTHER.   PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS.       8A) ONE FDC IS INDICATED ON TRINITY AND IS ACCEPTABLE.   A SECOND FDC IS REQUESTED ON TANGLEWOOD NEAR THAT   HYDRANT FOR EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT FIRE GROUND   OPERATIONAL STARATIGY AND TACTICS.       9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER   THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY   ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM,   ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FS 61G AND   SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PLAN.       9A) A FIRE PUMP/FIRE PUMP ROOM IS NOT INDICATED. PLEASE   CLARIFY INTENTION AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS.       9B) THE LOCATION OF THEFIRE LINE DDCV SHALL BE CLOSELY   COORDINATED WITH THE OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL, CITY   ENGINEERING, CITY URBAN DESIGNER, AND CITY LANDSCAPE   PLANNER.       10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL   BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL   DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,   EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A   PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE   SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.       11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE   SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY   DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.       12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT   DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.       13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING   PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH   THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.       PETER LEDUC   FIRE MARSHAL   561-804-4709   [email protected]     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 4 Status P Date 03-17-2020 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 03-17-2020 Time 16:02 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 03-17-2020 Time 16:02 Sent To   Notes 2020-03-17 16:02:37 FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER   PROJECT: 625 S OLIVE MICROUNITS Z19070006   MARCH 17, 2020   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:       1. THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN SHEET L1.00 MUST BE   COMPLETED AND CORRECTED FOR THE FOLLOWING:   ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE CANOPY MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE   REQUIRED FOR ALL REMOVED TREES EXCEPT INVASIVE EXOTIC   SPECIES. TREES AND PALMS CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE TO BE   MITIGATED BASED ON CATEGORY. ANY TREES 20 FEET OR MORE   CANOPY DIAMETER TO BE MITIGATED BY ACTUAL SQUARE   FOOTAGE.   TREES #37, 38 AND 41 CLASSIFIED AS LEANING MUST STILL   BE MITIGATED. ADD THE APPROPRIATE MITIGATION DUE AND   REVISE THE CHART.   ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION VALUES BY CATEGORY   FOR THE PROPOSED TREES AND PALMS BASED ON THE PLANT   LIST.       2. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-448 (D)(3), ALL NATIVE   TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION MUST BE PRESERVED ON   SITE OR RELOCATED. THERE ARE MULTIPLE LIVE OAKS AND   SABAL PALMS PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED. THE LARGEST LIVE   OAK MAY BE ABLE TO BE USED ON SITE AS A SPECIMEN WITH   SOME DESIGN CHANGES TO THE SITE.   12 CABBAGE PALMS MUST BE RELOCATED IF IN GOOD   CONDITION. THEY CAN BE MOVED TO THE WESTERN BUFFER.   PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION.           3. SATISFIED. CLARIFY THE OPEN SPACE TYPES AND   REQUIREMENTS TO CALL OUT THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE AND THE   CALCULATIONS FOR THE REQUIRED TYPE FOR EACH OF THE OPEN   SPACE AREAS SUCH AS ROOFTOP GARDEN OR TERRACE. SHEET   L3.00 PARTIALLY DOES THIS BUT IS LABELED HARDSCAPE   PLAN. LIST THE TREES PROVIDED AND PROVIDE TREE CANOPY   SQUARE FOOTAGE PER TABLE IV-8 FOR SPACES THAT REQUIRE   TREE CANOPY PERCENTAGES.   OPEN SPACE NEEDS TO BE IDENTIFIED PROPERLY FOR THE TYPE   ALLOWED AND CLASSIFICATION.   DEFINITIONS OF EACH OPEN SPACE TYPE CAN BE FOUND IN   SECTION 94-109.   QGD10 ALLOWS ROOFTOP GARDEN OR TERRACE AS PRIVATE OPEN   SPACE TYPES PER TABLE IV-6. THERE IS NO TYPE CALLED   ROOFTOP TERRACE.   TERRACE REQUIRES 20 PERCENT VEGETATED AREA AND NO TREE   CANOPY. ROOFTOP GARDEN REQUIRES 30 PERCENT VEGETATED   AREA AND 20 PERCENT TREE CANOPY PER TABLE IV-7. TREE   CANOPY VALUES ARE FOUND IN TABLE IV-8.   GROUND FLOOR OPEN SPACE NEEDS TO BE CLASSIFIED AS A   PERMITTED TYPE.       3/2/20 IN ORDER TO MEET THE REQUIREMENT OF PROVIDING   PUBLIC OPEN SPACE IN PLACE OF REQUIRED PRIVATE OPEN   SPACE, THE GROUND FLOOR OPEN SPACE MUST BE CLASSIFIED   AS EITHER GARDEN COURTYARD OR GARDEN PLAZA, AS THESE   ARE THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE OPTIONS FOR QGD10.   CHOOSE ONE OF THESE TYPES AND PROVIDE THE REQUIRED   PERCENTAGE OF VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY FOR THE   SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED. THE MINIMUM 900 SQ FT DOES NOT   APPLY, THE ACTUAL SUBSTITUTION SQUARE FOOTAGE CAN BE   USED AND CLEARLY DELINEATED.       4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE BUFFER PLANTINGS ON THE WEST AND   SOUTH SIDES OF THE BUILDING TO BUFFER THE PARKING   GARAGE.       5. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE FOLLOWING ON THE PLANT LIST:   ? MINIMUM SIZE FOR STREET TREES IS 20 FEET HEIGHT.   ? CORRECT TO IDENTIFY NATIVE AND NON-NATIVE SPECIES.   ? PROVIDE ONE COMPREHENSIVE PLANT LIST ON ONE SHEET.   PROVIDE QUANTITIES FOR EACH SPECIES ON PLANT LIST.           6. SATISFIED. WALK UP GARDENS IN FRONT OF STREET UNITS   MUST CONTAIN LANDSCAPING.       7. SATISFIED. COVERED AREAS DO NOT QUALIFY AS OPEN   SPACE. AREA AT SOUTHEAST CORNER CANNOT BE A GARDEN   PLAZA.       8. SATISFIED. STREET TREES NEED TO BE SPACED TO PROVIDE   CANOPY OVER THE PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALKS. SPACING NEEDS TO   BE ADJUSTED ON S OLIVE TO SPREAD THE TREES AND ADD A   PLANTING BULB OUT BETWEEN THE PARALLEL PARKING SPACES.   SPACING OF OAKS ON TRINITY CANNOT BE AFFECTED BY   UTILITY PLACEMENT. UTILITIES NEED TO BE COORDINATED TO   NOT DISRUPT SPACING OF TREE CANOPY.       9. SATISFIED. ADJUST SPACING OF STREET TREES ON   TANGLEWOOD SO THERE IS A TREE WEST OF THE DRIVEWAY   ENTRANCE.   TREE MAY NOT BE POSSIBLE WITH SIDEWALK AND ENTRANCE   DESIGN. SEE ZONING COMMENTS.       10. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-113, TREE GRATES ARE ONLY   USED WHEN THE SIDEWALK AREA IS NEEDED. PLANTING AREAS   CAN BE USED ON ALL SIDES ADJACENT TO THE CURB. PAVER   SECTIONS CAN BE ADDED ALONG S OLIVE AT SOME LOCATIONS   TO PROVIDE DESIGN CONTINUITY.       11. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. SHOW ACTUAL PERCENTAGE FOR   COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A   MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE   FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED   FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST   RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT   DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.   QUANTITIES OF PLANT MATERIAL MUST BE PROVIDED TO   ACCURATELY PROVIDE PERCENTAGE.       CHECK THE CODE WORDING ON SHEET L2.00, AS IT IS NOT THE   CURRENT CODE PASSED IN 2018. THE CODE IN THIS COMMENT   IS THE CURRENT VERSION. OF THE TOTAL ADDED PLANT   MATERIAL, CALCULATE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE OR   DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS PROVIDED. ADDING A DROUGHT   TOLERANCE COLUMN FOR THE NON NATIVE PLANTS IS HELPFUL.       ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 11/22/19:       12. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS   REQUIRED TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES. PROVIDE A TYPICAL   ROOT BARRIER DETAIL.       13. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF REQUIRED STRUCTURAL   SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE ADJACENT TO STREET TREES. PROVIDE   A TYPICAL FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE STRUCTURAL SOIL.   SHEET L-8.00 WAS NOT FOUND IN THE SUBMITTAL.   STRUCTURAL SOIL IS ONLY NEEDED UNDER PAVED AREAS. OPEN   PLANTING AREAS ARE TO BE PLANTING SOIL TO A DEPTH OF 24   INCHES. REVISE THE PLAN TO SHOW THIS.           14. SATISFIED. CHECK SPECIES OF PLANTS SPECIFIED TO   VERIFY NATIVE TO FLORIDA: ALPINIA AND ALOCASIA ARE NOT   NATIVE AND CHECK ALL OTHERS TO MAKE SURE THEY WILL BE   VIABLE IN SOUTH FLORIDA.       15. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MASTER PLANT LIST ON ONE PAGE   TO SHOW ALL THE PLANTS PROVIDED. INDIVIDUAL SHEETS MAY   HAVE SEPARATE LISTS REFERRING TO THE AREA ON THAT   SHEET, BUT ONE MASTER PLANT LIST MUST BE PROVIDED WITH   ALL COMPLIANCE CALCULATIONS.       CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.   2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE   STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND   IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.   3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF   WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A   SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.       4. THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A CORRECTED LANDSCAPE   PLAN SHOWING THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF PLANT MATERIAL   ADDED THAT IS FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT   SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF   SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA   WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA   LANDSCAPES.       5. THE APPLICANT SHALL WORK WITH CITY STAFF TO CONTINUE   TO EXPLORE OPTIONS FOR RELOCATION OF THE LARGE LIVE OAK   TREE #18 TO AN OFF SITE LOCATION.     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 3 Status F Date 03-02-2020 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 03-02-2020 Time 15:54 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 03-02-2020 Time 15:54 Sent To   Notes 2020-03-02 15:55:51 FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER   PROJECT: 625 S OLIVE MICROUNITS Z19070006   MARCH 2, 2020   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:       1. THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN SHEET L1.00 MUST BE   COMPLETED AND CORRECTED FOR THE FOLLOWING:   ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE CANOPY MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE   REQUIRED FOR ALL REMOVED TREES EXCEPT INVASIVE EXOTIC   SPECIES. TREES AND PALMS CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE TO BE   MITIGATED BASED ON CATEGORY. ANY TREES 20 FEET OR MORE   CANOPY DIAMETER TO BE MITIGATED BY ACTUAL SQUARE   FOOTAGE.   TREES #37, 38 AND 41 CLASSIFIED AS LEANING MUST STILL   BE MITIGATED. ADD THE APPROPRIATE MITIGATION DUE AND   REVISE THE CHART.   ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION VALUES BY CATEGORY   FOR THE PROPOSED TREES AND PALMS BASED ON THE PLANT   LIST.       2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-448 (D)(3), ALL   NATIVE TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION MUST BE   PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. THERE ARE MULTIPLE LIVE   OAKS AND SABAL PALMS PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED. THE   LARGEST LIVE OAK MAY BE ABLE TO BE USED ON SITE AS A   SPECIMEN WITH SOME DESIGN CHANGES TO THE SITE.   12 CABBAGE PALMS MUST BE RELOCATED IF IN GOOD   CONDITION. THEY CAN BE MOVED TO THE WESTERN   BUFFER.PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION.           3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. CLARIFY THE OPEN SPACE TYPES   AND REQUIREMENTS TO CALL OUT THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE AND   THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE REQUIRED TYPE FOR EACH OF THE   OPEN SPACE AREAS SUCH AS ROOFTOP GARDEN OR TERRACE.   SHEET L3.00 PARTIALLY DOES THIS BUT IS LABELED   HARDSCAPE PLAN. LIST THE TREES PROVIDED AND PROVIDE   TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE PER TABLE IV-8 FOR SPACES   THAT REQUIRE TREE CANOPY PERCENTAGES.   OPEN SPACE NEEDS TO BE IDENTIFIED PROPERLY FOR THE TYPE   ALLOWED AND CLASSIFICATION.   DEFINITIONS OF EACH OPEN SPACE TYPE CAN BE FOUND IN   SECTION 94-109.   QGD10 ALLOWS ROOFTOP GARDEN OR TERRACE AS PRIVATE OPEN   SPACE TYPES PER TABLE IV-6. THERE IS NO TYPE CALLED   ROOFTOP TERRACE.   TERRACE REQUIRES 20 PERCENT VEGETATED AREA AND NO TREE   CANOPY. ROOFTOP GARDEN REQUIRES 30 PERCENT VEGETATED   AREA AND 20 PERCENT TREE CANOPY PER TABLE IV-7. TREE   CANOPY VALUES ARE FOUND IN TABLE IV-8.   GROUND FLOOR OPEN SPACE NEEDS TO BE CLASSIFIED AS A   PERMITTED TYPE.       3/2/20 IN ORDER TO MEET THE REQUIREMENT OF PROVIDING   PUBLIC OPEN SPACE IN PLACE OF REQUIRED PRIVATE OPEN   SPACE, THE GROUND FLOOR OPEN SPACE MUST BE CLASSIFIED   AS EITHER GARDEN COURTYARD OR GARDEN PLAZA, AS THESE   ARE THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE OPTIONS FOR QGD10.   CHOOSE ONE OF THESE TYPES AND PROVIDE THE REQUIRED   PERCENTAGE OF VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY FOR THE   SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED. THE MINIMUM 900 SQ FT DOES NOT   APPLY, THE ACTUAL SUBSTITUTION SQUARE FOOTAGE CAN BE   USED AND CLEARLY DELINEATED.       4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE BUFFER PLANTINGS ON THE WEST AND   SOUTH SIDES OF THE BUILDING TO BUFFER THE PARKING   GARAGE.       5. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE FOLLOWING ON THE PLANT LIST:   ? MINIMUM SIZE FOR STREET TREES IS 20 FEET HEIGHT.   ? CORRECT TO IDENTIFY NATIVE AND NON-NATIVE SPECIES.   ? PROVIDE ONE COMPREHENSIVE PLANT LIST ON ONE SHEET.   PROVIDE QUANTITIES FOR EACH SPECIES ON PLANT LIST.           6. SATISFIED. WALK UP GARDENS IN FRONT OF STREET UNITS   MUST CONTAIN LANDSCAPING.       7. SATISFIED. COVERED AREAS DO NOT QUALIFY AS OPEN   SPACE. AREA AT SOUTHEAST CORNER CANNOT BE A GARDEN   PLAZA.       8. SATISFIED. STREET TREES NEED TO BE SPACED TO PROVIDE   CANOPY OVER THE PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALKS. SPACING NEEDS TO   BE ADJUSTED ON S OLIVE TO SPREAD THE TREES AND ADD A   PLANTING BULB OUT BETWEEN THE PARALLEL PARKING SPACES.   SPACING OF OAKS ON TRINITY CANNOT BE AFFECTED BY   UTILITY PLACEMENT. UTILITIES NEED TO BE COORDINATED TO   NOT DISRUPT SPACING OF TREE CANOPY.       9. SATISFIED. ADJUST SPACING OF STREET TREES ON   TANGLEWOOD SO THERE IS A TREE WEST OF THE DRIVEWAY   ENTRANCE.   TREE MAY NOT BE POSSIBLE WITH SIDEWALK AND ENTRANCE   DESIGN. SEE ZONING COMMENTS.       10. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-113, TREE GRATES ARE ONLY   USED WHEN THE SIDEWALK AREA IS NEEDED. PLANTING AREAS   CAN BE USED ON ALL SIDES ADJACENT TO THE CURB. PAVER   SECTIONS CAN BE ADDED ALONG S OLIVE AT SOME LOCATIONS   TO PROVIDE DESIGN CONTINUITY.       11. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW ACTUAL PERCENTAGE FOR   COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A   MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE   FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED   FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST   RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT   DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.   QUANTITIES OF PLANT MATERIAL MUST BE PROVIDED TO   ACCURATELY PROVIDE PERCENTAGE.       CHECK THE CODE WORDING ON SHEET L2.00, AS IT IS NOT THE   CURRENT CODE PASSED IN 2018. THE CODE IN THIS COMMENT   IS THE CURRENT VERSION. OF THE TOTAL ADDED PLANT   MATERIAL, CALCULATE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF NATIVE OR   DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS PROVIDED. ADDING A DROUGHT   TOLERANCE COLUMN FOR THE NON NATIVE PLANTS IS HELPFUL.       ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 11/22/19:       12. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS   REQUIRED TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES. PROVIDE A TYPICAL   ROOT BARRIER DETAIL.       13. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF REQUIRED   STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE ADJACENT TO STREET   TREES. PROVIDE A TYPICAL FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE   STRUCTURAL SOIL.   SHEET L-8.00 WAS NOT FOUND IN THE SUBMITTAL.   STRUCTURAL SOIL IS ONLY NEEDED UNDER PAVED AREAS. OPEN   PLANTING AREAS ARE TO BE PLANTING SOIL TO A DEPTH OF 24   INCHES. REVISE THE PLAN TO SHOW THIS.           14. SATISFIED. CHECK SPECIES OF PLANTS SPECIFIED TO   VERIFY NATIVE TO FLORIDA: ALPINIA AND ALOCASIA ARE NOT   NATIVE AND CHECK ALL OTHERS TO MAKE SURE THEY WILL BE   VIABLE IN SOUTH FLORIDA.       15. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MASTER PLANT LIST ON ONE PAGE   TO SHOW ALL THE PLANTS PROVIDED. INDIVIDUAL SHEETS MAY   HAVE SEPARATE LISTS REFERRING TO THE AREA ON THAT   SHEET, BUT ONE MASTER PLANT LIST MUST BE PROVIDED WITH   ALL COMPLIANCE CALCULATIONS.       CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.   2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE   STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND   IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.   3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF   WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A   SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 2 Status F Date 11-22-2019 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 11-22-2019 Time 15:28 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 11-22-2019 Time 15:28 Sent To   Notes 2019-11-22 15:28:43 FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER   PROJECT: 625 S OLIVE MICROUNITS Z19070006   NOVEMBER 22, 2019   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:       1. THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN SHEET L1.00 MUST BE   COMPLETED AND CORRECTED FOR THE FOLLOWING:   ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE CANOPY MITIGATION SQUARE   FOOTAGE REQUIRED FOR ALL REMOVED TREES EXCEPT INVASIVE   EXOTIC SPECIES. TREES AND PALMS CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE   TO BE MITIGATED BASED ON CATEGORY. ANY TREES 20 FEET OR   MORE CANOPY DIAMETER TO BE MITIGATED BY ACTUAL SQUARE   FOOTAGE.   TREES #37, 38 AND 41 CLASSIFIED AS LEANING MUST STILL   BE MITIGATED. ADD THE APPROPRIATE MITIGATION DUE AND   REVISE THE CHART.   ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION VALUES BY CATEGORY   FOR THE PROPOSED TREES AND PALMS BASED ON THE PLANT   LIST.       2. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-448 (D)(3), ALL NATIVE   TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION MUST BE PRESERVED ON   SITE OR RELOCATED. THERE ARE MULTIPLE LIVE OAKS AND   SABAL PALMS PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED. THE LARGEST LIVE   OAK MAY BE ABLE TO BE USED ON SITE AS A SPECIMEN WITH   SOME DESIGN CHANGES TO THE SITE.       3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. CLARIFY THE OPEN SPACE TYPES   AND REQUIREMENTS TO CALL OUT THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE AND   THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE REQUIRED TYPE FOR EACH OF THE   OPEN SPACE AREAS SUCH AS ROOFTOP GARDEN OR TERRACE.   SHEET L3.00 PARTIALLY DOES THIS BUT IS LABELED   HARDSCAPE PLAN. LIST THE TREES PROVIDED AND PROVIDE   TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE PER TABLE IV-8 FOR SPACES   THAT REQUIRE TREE CANOPY PERCENTAGES.   OPEN SPACE NEEDS TO BE IDENTIFIED PROPERLY FOR THE TYPE   ALLOWED AND CLASSIFICATION.   DEFINITIONS OF EACH OPEN SPACE TYPE CAN BE FOUND IN   SECTION 94-109.   QGD10 ALLOWS ROOFTOP GARDEN OR TERRACE AS PRIVATE OPEN   SPACE TYPES PER TABLE IV-6. THERE IS NO TYPE CALLED   ROOFTOPTERRACE.   TERRACE REQUIRES 20 PERCENT VEGETATED AREA AND NO TREE   CANOPY. ROOFTOP GARDEN REQUIRES 30 PERCENT VEGETATED   AREA AND 20 PERCENT TREE CANOPY PER TABLE IV-7. TREE   CANOPY VALUES ARE FOUND IN TABLE IV-8.   GROUND FLOOR OPEN SPACE NEEDS TO BE CLASSIFIED AS A   PERMITTED TYPE.       4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE BUFFER PLANTINGS ON THE WEST AND   SOUTH SIDES OF THE BUILDING TO BUFFER THE PARKING   GARAGE.       5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. CORRECT THE FOLLOWING ON THE   PLANT LIST:   ? MINIMUM SIZE FOR STREET TREES IS 20 FEET HEIGHT.   ? CORRECT TO IDENTIFY NATIVE AND NON-NATIVE SPECIES.   ? PROVIDE ONE COMPREHENSIVE PLANT LIST ON ONE SHEET.   PROVIDE QUANTITIES FOR EACH SPECIES ON PLANT LIST.           6. SATISFIED. WALK UP GARDENS IN FRONT OF STREET UNITS   MUST CONTAIN LANDSCAPING.       7. SATISFIED. COVERED AREAS DO NOT QUALIFY AS OPEN   SPACE. AREA AT SOUTHEAST CORNER CANNOT BE A GARDEN   PLAZA.       8. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. STREET TREES NEED TO BE SPACED   TO PROVIDE CANOPY OVER THE PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALKS.   SPACING NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED ON S OLIVE TO SPREAD THE   TREES AND ADD A PLANTING BULB OUT BETWEEN THE PARALLEL   PARKING SPACES.   SPACING OF OAKS ON TRINITY CANNOT BE AFFECTED BY   UTILITY PLACEMENT. UTILITIES NEED TO BE COORDINATED TO   NOT DISRUPT SPACING OF TREE CANOPY.       9. SATISFIED. ADJUST SPACING OF STREET TREES ON   TANGLEWOOD SO THERE IS A TREE WEST OF THE DRIVEWAY   ENTRANCE.   TREE MAY NOT BE POSSIBLE WITH SIDEWALK AND ENTRANCE   DESIGN. SEE ZONING COMMENTS.       10. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-113, TREE GRATES ARE ONLY   USED WHEN THE SIDEWALK AREA IS NEEDED. PLANTING AREAS   CAN BE USED ON ALL SIDES ADJACENT TO THE CURB. PAVER   SECTIONS CAN BE ADDED ALONG S OLIVE AT SOME LOCATIONS   TO PROVIDE DESIGN CONTINUITY.       11. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW ACTUAL PERCENTAGE FOR   COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A   MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE   FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED   FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST   RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT   DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.   QUANTITIES OF PLANT MATERIAL MUST BE PROVIDED TO   ACCURATELY PROVIDE PERCENTAGE.       ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 11/22/19:       12. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS REQUIRED TO   PROTECT UTILITY LINES. PROVIDE A TYPICAL ROOT BARRIER   DETAIL.       13. SHOW LOCATIONS OF REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER   HARDSCAPE ADJACENT TO STREET TREES. PROVIDE A TYPICAL   FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE STRUCTURAL SOIL.       14. CHECK SPECIES OF PLANTS SPECIFIED TO VERIFY NATIVE   TO FLORIDA: ALPINIA AND ALOCASIA ARE NOT NATIVE AND   CHECK ALL OTHERS TO MAKE SURE THEY WILL BE VIABLE IN   SOUTH FLORIDA.       15. PROVIDE A MASTER PLANT LIST ON ONE PAGE TO SHOW ALL   THE PLANTS PROVIDED. INDIVIDUAL SHEETS MAY HAVE   SEPARATE LISTS REFERRING TO THE AREA ON THAT SHEET, BUT   ONE MASTER PLANT LIST MUST BE PROVIDED WITH ALL   COMPLIANCE CALCULATIONS.       CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.   2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE   STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND   IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.   3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF   WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A   SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.     Review Stop L LANDSCAPING Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-13-2019 Cont ID   Sent By rcaranci Date 08-13-2019 Time 17:03 Rev Time 0.00 Received By rcaranci Date 08-13-2019 Time 17:03 Sent To   Notes 2019-08-13 17:03:49 FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER   PROJECT: 625 S OLIVE MICROUNITS Z19070006   AUGUST 13, 2019   I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND   PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:       1. THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN SHEET L1.00 MUST BE   COMPLETED AND CORRECTED FOR THE FOLLOWING:   ? PROVIDE CANOPY MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE REQUIRED FOR   ALL REMOVED TREES EXCEPT INVASIVE EXOTIC SPECIES. TREES   AND PALMS CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE TO BE MITIGATED BASED   ON CATEGORY. ANY TREES 20 FEET OR MORE CANOPY DIAMETER   TO BE MITIGATED BY ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE.   ? PROVIDE THE MITIGATION VALUES BY CATEGORY FOR THE   PROPOSED TREES AND PALMS BASED ON THE PLANT LIST.       2. PER SECTION 94-448 (D)(3), ALL NATIVE TREES AND   PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION MUST BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR   RELOCATED. THERE ARE MULTIPLE LIVE OAKS AND SABAL PALMS   PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED. THE LARGEST LIVE OAK MAY BE   ABLE TO BE USED ON SITE AS A SPECIMEN WITH SOME DESIGN   CHANGES TO THE SITE.       3. CLARIFY THE OPEN SPACE TYPES AND REQUIREMENTS TO   CALL OUT THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE AND THE CALCULATIONS   FOR THE REQUIRED TYPE FOR EACH OF THE OPEN SPACE AREAS   SUCH AS ROOFTOP GARDEN OR TERRACE. SHEET L3.00   PARTIALLY DOES THIS BUT IS LABELED HARDSCAPE PLAN. LIST   THE TREES PROVIDED AND PROVIDE TREE CANOPY SQUARE   FOOTAGE PER TABLE IV-8 FOR SPACES THAT REQUIRE TREE   CANOPY PERCENTAGES.       4. PROVIDE BUFFER PLANTINGS ON THE WEST AND SOUTH SIDES   OF THE BUILDING TO BUFFER THE PARKING GARAGE.       5. CORRECT THE FOLLOWING ON THE PLANT LIST:   ? MINIMUM SIZE FOR STREET TREES IS 20 FEET HEIGHT.   ? CORRECT TO IDENTIFY NATIVE AND NON-NATIVE SPECIES.   ? PROVIDE ONE COMPREHENSIVE PLANT LIST ON ONE SHEET.           6. WALK UP GARDENS IN FRONT OF STREET UNITS MUST   CONTAIN LANDSCAPING.       7. COVERED AREAS DO NOT QUALIFY AS OPEN SPACE. AREA AT   SOUTHEAST CORNER CANNOT BE A GARDEN PLAZA.       8. STREET TREES NEED TO BE SPACED TO PROVIDE CANOPY   OVER THE PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALKS. SPACING NEEDS TO BE   ADJUSTED ON S OLIVE TO SPREAD THE TREES AND ADD A   PLANTING BULB OUT BETWEEN THE PARALLEL PARKING SPACES.       9. ADJUST SPACING OF STREET TREES ON TANGLEWOOD SO   THERE IS A TREE WEST OF THE DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE.       10. PER SECTION 94-113, TREE GRATES ARE ONLY USED WHEN   THE SIDEWALK AREA IS NEEDED. PLANTING AREAS CAN BE USED   ON ALL SIDES ADJACENT TO THE CURB. PAVER SECTIONS CAN   BE ADDED ALONG S OLIVE AT SOME LOCATIONS TO PROVIDE   DESIGN CONTINUITY.       11. SHOW ACTUAL PERCENTAGE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION   94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF   PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT   TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE   LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH   FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH   FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.       CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL   1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.   2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE   STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND   IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.   3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF   WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A   SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.     Review Stop PARK PARKING Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time   Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop POLICE POLICE Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time   Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS Rev No 3 Status P Date 03-18-2020 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 03-18-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date 03-18-2020 Time   Sent To   Notes 2020-03-18 16:57:13 PASSED WITH TWO CONDITIONS BELOW AT THE TIME OF   BUILDING PERMIT:       - PROVIDE LOS ANALYSIS   - PROVIDE TRASH ROOM DETAIL TO SHOW MIN. CLEARANCE   (I.E. FOR THE CEILING, & DOOR) OF 10 FT.     Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS Rev No 2 Status F Date 12-03-2019 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 12-03-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date 12-03-2019 Time   Sent To   Notes 2019-12-03 12:38:38 THE AUTOTURN PROVIDED, SHEET C7.00 DOES NOT REFLECT THE   CORRECT VEHICLE TYPE. PLEASE RE-SUBMIT THE SHEET   REFLECTING THE CORRECT SPECIFICATION FOR OUR FRONT   LOADER TRUCK SHOWN BELOW:   - TRUCK LENGTH: 35 FT   - TRUCK WIDTH: 11 FT   - TURNING RADIUS:   - SAE TURNING RADIUS: 32.5 FT   - CURB-TO-CURB DIAMETER: 74 FT   - WALL-TO-WALL DIAMETER: 86.3 FT       MATT HEJAZI   DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS   561-822-2045   [email protected]     Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-12-2019 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 08-12-2019 Time   Rev Time   Received By   Date 08-12-2019 Time   Sent To   Notes 2019-08-12 16:47:56 PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:   - LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID   WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE OF THE   COMPACTOR THAT WILL BE UTILIZED.   - ENCLOSURE SPEC PER LATEST REVISION OF CITY OF WEST   PALM BEACH GENERAL CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE   STANDARD, CG-8, LATEST REVISION.   - AUTO TURN FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE   - DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP           MATT HEJAZI   DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS   [email protected]   561-822-2045 Review Stop STORM STORMWATER Rev No 3 Status P Date 03-18-2020 Cont ID   Sent By tward Date 03-18-2020 Time 10:28 Rev Time 0.00 Received By tward Date 03-18-2020 Time 10:30 Sent To   Notes 2020-03-18 10:30:45 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE MARCH   17, 2020 REVIEW SUBMITTAL. THE COMMENTS MAY BE PROVISOS   FOR CONDITIONAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL AND BE ADDRESSED   DURING ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMISSION.       1. THE CURB LINE ALONG TRINITY PLACE AT S. OLIVE AVE   MAY NEED TO BE ADJUSTED TO ALIGN WITH THE PROPOSED TOP   FOR THE EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE.       2. SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN EASEMENTS ON   THE PERIMETER SECTIONS ON SHEET C8.00.       3. TRENCH DRAIN AT THE SOUTH DRIVEWAY MAY NOT BE   NECESSARY SINCE IT IS LOCATED SO FAR INTO THE GARAGE.   GRADE THE DRIVEWAY TO DRAIN TO THE CONTROL STRUCTURE.       4. CONSIDER SLOPING THE STORMWATER PIPES BETWEEN THE   CONTROL STRUCTURE AND EXISTING CATCH BASIN ON TRINITY   PLACE.       5. CONSIDER FLATTENING THE SLOPE OF THE PARKING AREA IN   PERIMETER SECTION B-B TO 2% AND STEEPENING THE SLOPE OF   THE LANDSCAPE AREA BEHIND THE CURB.       6. SHOW SWALE TYPE CROSS SECTIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE   AREAS TO CAPTURE AND RETAIN/DETAIN RUNOFF FROM THE   SIDEWALK AREAS.       7. GRATE ELEVATION (11.50? NAVD) OF THE NORTH TRENCH   DRAIN APPEARS TO BE LOWER THAN THE ADJACENT DRIVEWAY   GRADES.       TRACY WARD, P.E.   SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT   [email protected]   561-494-1120     Review Stop STORM STORMWATER Rev No 2 Status F Date 02-28-2020 Cont ID   Sent By tward Date 02-28-2020 Time 16:52 Rev Time 0.00 Received By tward Date 02-28-2020 Time 17:22 Sent To   Notes 2020-02-28 17:22:41 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE   FEBRUARY 13, 2020 REVIEW SUBMITTAL PACKAGE:       1. REPLACE CONCRETE INLET TOP OF CATCH BASIN INLET ON   THE NORTH SIDE OF TRINITY PL. WEST OF S. OLIVE AVE.       2. ELIMINATE THE BLEEDER IN THE STORMWATER CONTROL   STRUCTURE.       3. THE HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE OF THE S. OLIVE AVE   DRAINAGE SYSTEM SHOULD BE CONSIDERED IN THE SETTING OF   THE WEIR ELEVATION FOR THE CONTROL STRUCTURE. IF THE   WEIR IS SET TOO LOW, THERE MAY BE BACKFLOW INTO THE   ONSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM FROM THE ROADWAY DRAINAGE   SYSTEM.       4. EXFILTRATION TRENCH IS PROPOSED WITHIN THE BUILDING.   THE VERTICAL CLEARANCE SHOULD BE DESIGNED FOR   MAINTENANCE VEHICLES (E.G. VACUUM TRUCKS) ACCESS TO THE   MANHOLES AND FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT TO REPLACE THE   EXFILTRATION TRENCH WHEN IT IS NO LONGER FUNCTIONING AS   DESIGNED.       5. WHY THE BREAK IN THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH ABOUT 65   FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTH TRENCH DRAIN?       6. CONSIDER MOVING THE NORTH TRENCH DRAIN ACROSS THE   DRIVEWAY FURTHER SOUTH, AT A HIGHER RIM ELEVATION. THIS   TRENCH MAY BECOME A BUBBLE UP STRUCTURE AND RELEASE   WATER TOWARD TANGLEWOOD COURT WHEN ALL OFFSITE   DISCHARGE SHOULD BE THROUGH THE CONTROL STRUCTURE.       7. CONFIRM DRIVEWAY APRONS IN THE RIGHT OF WAY MEET   CITY STANDARDS.       8. LIST THE SEASONAL HIGH GROUNDWATER TABLE ELEVATION   ON THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH DETAIL ST-8.       9. LIST THE VERTICAL DATUM AND CONVERSION EQUATION TO   NGVD1929 ON SHEET C4.02 AND ALL SHEETS WITH ELEVATION   INFORMATION.       10. LABEL THE STREETS ON THE EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION   CONTROL PLAN SHEET.       11. PROVIDE INLET PROTECTION DETAIL FOR AN INLET   WITHOUT A HOOD OPENING. THERE ARE VALLEY GUTTER INLETS   AND DITCH BOTTOM STYLE INLETS WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.       12. CAN CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC ACCESS BE LIMITED TO THE   SIDE STREETS AND NOT FROM S. OLIVE AVE.?       TRACY L. WARD, P.E.   SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT   [email protected]   561-494-1120         Review Stop STORM STORMWATER Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-14-2019 Cont ID   Sent By tward Date 08-14-2019 Time 00:05 Rev Time 0.00 Received By tward Date 08-14-2019 Time 00:05 Sent To   Notes 2019-08-14 00:05:50 THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL   DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION   PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE   ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT   APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT   APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT       HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR   MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS       THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE   PLAN APPROVAL:       1. MOVE THE DRAINAGE CONTROL STRUCTURE AND THE PIPE TO   THE EAST OUT OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. AN ADDITIONAL   DRAINAGE STRUCTURE MAY BE NEEDED NORTH OF THE PROPOSED   CATCH BASIN INLET IN THE TRINITY PLACE R/W.       2. SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.       3. CONSIDER A STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM DIFFERENT   FROM EXFILTRATION TRENCHES. THE EFFECTIVE LIFE OF   EXFILTRATION TRENCHES IS 5 ? 10 YEARS OR LESS BEFORE   THEY WILL NEED TO BE REPLACED. DIGGING UP AND REPLACING   THE TRENCHES WILL HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE INTERIOR   TRAFFIC CIRCULATION.       4. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD   CRITERIA FOR STORMWATER TREATMENT AND PEAK FLOW   ATTENUATION FOR PRE- VS POST-DEVELOPMENT DISCHARGE.       5. THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM IN OLIVE AVE INCLUDES CONTROL   STRUCTURES WHICH AFFECT THE HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE. THE   HGL MAY BE HIGHER THAN THE WEIR ELEVATION IN THE   PROPOSED CONTROL STRUCTURE.       6. PROVIDE CCTV OF THE EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEMS   SURROUNDING THE PROJECT SITE.       THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO   ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING   BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.       1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY   BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.   THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS   CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE   ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS       2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED   WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.       3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP PERMIT PRIOR TO   STARTING CONSTRUCTION.           TRACY WARD, PE   SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT   561-494-1120   [email protected]     Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING Rev No 3 Status P Date 03-18-2020 Cont ID   Sent By vnoel Date 03-18-2020 Time 16:45 Rev Time 0.00 Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To   Notes ***NONE*** Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING Rev No 2 Status F Date 12-10-2019 Cont ID   Sent By vnoel Date 12-10-2019 Time 08:33 Rev Time 0.00 Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2019-12-10 08:34:35 !. CCTV IS REQUIRED FOR PPRC APPROVAL PRIOR TO   ENGINEERING SERVICES APPROVAL AND CONSTRUCTION   AUTHORIZATION. Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-13-2019 Cont ID   Sent By vnoel Date 08-13-2019 Time 07:55 Rev Time   Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2019-08-13 08:10:34 1. LABEL THE 12' PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT ALONG   TRINITY PLACE ON SURVEY AND ALL PLANS.   2. NO CCTV RECEIVED FOR ADJACENT SANITARY OR STORM.   3. DID ENG. OF RECORD MEET WITH ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC   PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL?   4. ADDITIONAL PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENTS WILL BE   REQUIRED ALONG WITH A RIGHT-OF-WAY MAINTENANCE   AGREEMENT.   5. DOES EXISTING SANITARY TO BE REMOVED SERVE ADJACENT   PROPERTY? Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 4 Status P Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date 03-18-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2020-03-18 15:40:17 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:   1. PROVIDING MICROMOBILITY PARKING FACILITY IN LIEU OF   BIKE SHARING STATION. COORDINATE WITH CITY ON THE   DETAILS OF THE MICROMOBILITY PARKING FACILITY DURING   PERMITTING.   2. CONTRIBUTION TO THE CITY'S TRANSIT OPERATING FUND   WOULD BE REQUIRED PER CITY CODE.   3. PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM)   STRATEGIES TO MEET THE MODE SHIFT GOAL OF 50% AND   PROVIDE ANNUAL USAGE STATISTICS TO THE CITY, INCLUDING   BUT NOT LIMITED TO:   A. UNBUNDLE PARKING SPACES   B. PROVIDE TRANSIT PASS SUBSIDY   C. PROVIDE SHARED MOBILITY SUBSIDY   4. CONDUCT CURBSIDE MANAGEMENT STUDY TO EVALUATION THE   UTILIZATION OF CURBSIDE ANNUALLY AFTER THE FIRST CO IS   ISSUED UNTIL ONE YEAR AFTER THE LAST CO IS ISSUED.   5. REMOVE THE 3 PARKING SPACES MARKED AS "FUTURE CAR   SHARE" AND 1 PARKING SPACE MARKED AS "RESIDENTIAL   PARKING GUEST" BY THE OVERHANG GATE. OR RELOCATE THE   OVERHANG GATE TO ELIMINATE CONFLICTS.       SHING TSOI   CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT   561-494-1141   [email protected]   (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS)     Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 3 Status F Date 02-18-2020 Cont ID   Sent By   Date 02-18-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2020-02-18 16:29:27 SITE PLAN COMMENTS:   1. ON SHEET A1-01, IT APPEARS THERE ARE 3 DEAD-END   PARKING SPACES BEHIND THE LOADING AREA NEAR THE BICYCLE   STORAGE ROOM. PLEASE CLARIFY WHAT THOSE PARKING SPACES   ARE INTENDED FOR. PLEASE PROVIDE AUTOTURN PATHS TO   VERIFY VEHICLE MANEUVERS FOR THESE DEAD-END PARKING   SPACES. ALSO, PLEASE CLARIFY WHAT THOSE DOUBLE LINES   SEPARATING THESE PARKING SPACES AND THE LOADING AREA   REPRESENT.   2. ON SHEET A1-02, THERE ARE DOUBLE LINES AT THE END OF   THE PARKING RAMP AND WHERE IT IS INDICATED "OVERHEAD   VEHICULAR EGRESS ONLY". ARE THESE WALLS?           CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:   3. PROVIDING MICROMOBILITY PARKING FACILITY IN LIEU OF   BIKE SHARING STATION. COORDINATE WITH CITY ON THE   DETAILS OF THE MICROMOBILITY PARKING FACILITY DURING   PERMITTING.   4. CONTRIBUTION TO THE CITY?S TRANSIT OPERATING FUND   WOULD BE REQUIRED PER CITY CODE.   5. PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM)   STRATEGIES TO MEET THE MODE SHIFT GOAL OF 50% AND   PROVIDE ANNUAL USAGE STATISTICS TO THE CITY, INCLUDING   BUT NOT LIMITED TO:   A. UNBUNDLE PARKING SPACES   B. PROVIDE TRANSIT PASS SUBSIDY   C. PROVIDE SHARED MOBILITY SUBSIDY   6. CONDUCT CURBSIDE MANAGEMENT STUDY TO EVALUATION THE   UTILIZATION OF CURBSIDE ANNUALLY AFTER THE FIRST CO IS   ISSUED UNTIL ONE YEAR AFTER THE LAST CO IS ISSUED.           SHING TSOI   CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT   561-494-1141   [email protected]   (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS)     Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 2 Status F Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date 11-26-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00 Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2019-11-26 16:07:17 TRAFFIC STATEMENT COMMENTS:   1. THE SITE PLAN HAS BEEN SUBSTANTIALLY CHANGED WHICH   IMPACTS VEHICLE ACCESS AND CIRCULATION. PLEASE REVISE   THE TRIP ASSIGNMENT TO REFLECT THE LATEST CHANGES.   2. THE TABLE FOR TRAFFIC COUNTS COLLECTED AT TANGLEWOOD   COURT/OLIVE AVENUE IN ATTACHMENT B APPEAR TO BE   MISLABELED. PLEASE VERIFY.   3. SOME OF THE MOVEMENTS IN THE VOLUME DEVELOPMENT   SHEETS IN ATTACHMENT B APPEARS TO BE MISSING, E.G.   EASTBOUND THROUGH AT FERN STREET/DIXIE HIGHWAY AND FERN   STREET/OLIVE STREET, WESTBOUND RIGHT-TURN AT TANGLEWOOD   COURT/OLIVE AVENUE. PLEASE VERIFY AND REVISE.   SITE PLAN COMMENTS:   4. INDICATE THE LIMIT OF PROPOSED SIDEWALK EASEMENT ON   THE SITE PLAN.   5. LIMIT OF PAVEMENT RESTORATION NEEDS TO INCLUDE BOTH   SIDES OF THE STREET AND FOR AT LEAST 50 FEET IN EACH   DIRECTION OF THE TIE-IN POINT.   6. THE BICYCLE RACKS NEAR THE LEASING OFFICE ARE SHOWN   IN DIFFERENT LOCATIONS ON THE SITE PLAN, CIVIL PLAN AND   LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE BICYCLE RACKS SHOULD NOT OBSTRUCT   THE SIDEWALK. PLEASE VERIFY.   CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:   7. PROVIDING MICROMOBILITY PARKING FACILITY IN LIEU OF   BIKE SHARING STATION. COORDINATE WITH CITY ON THE   DETAILS OF THE MICROMOBILITY PARKING FACILITY DURING   PERMITTING.   8. CONTRIBUTION TO TROLLEY WOULD BE REQUIRED PER CITY   CODE.   9. PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM)   STRATEGIES TO MEET THE MODE SHIFT GOAL OF 50% AND   PROVIDE ANNUAL USAGE STATISTICS TO THE CITY, INCLUDING   BUT NOT LIMITED TO:   A. UNBUNDLE PARKING SPACES   B. PROVIDE TRANSIT PASS SUBSIDY   C. PROVIDE SHARED MOBILITY SUBSIDY   10. CONDUCT CURBSIDE MANAGEMENT STUDY TO EVALUATION THE   UTILIZATION OF CURBSIDE ANNUALLY AFTER THE FIRST CO IS   ISSUED UNTIL ONE YEAR AFTER THE LAST CO IS ISSUED.           SHING TSOI   CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT   561-494-1141   [email protected]   (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS) Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID   Sent By   Date 08-14-2019 Time   Rev Time   Received By   Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2019-08-14 10:26:22 TRAFFIC STATEMENT COMMENTS:   1. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER.   2. PROVIDE TRIP DISTRIBUTION WITHIN THE RADIUS OF   INFLUENCE PER PALM BEACH COUNTY TPS.   3. VERIFY THE TRIP ASSIGNMENT AT THE TWO DRIVEWAYS   SINCE THE VEHICULAR CIRCULATION FOR VEHICLES FROM   PARKING LEVELS 2 AND 3 ARE RESTRICTED IN THE CURRENT   SITE PLAN.   4. PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ANALYSIS AT THE   FOLLOWING INTERSECTIONS:   O DIXIE HIGHWAY/FERN STREET   O DIXIE HIGHWAY/TANGLEWOOD COURT   O DIXIE HIGHWAY/TRINITY PLACE   O DIXIE HIGHWAY/LAKEVIEW AVENUE   O DIXIE HIGHWAY/OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD   O OLIVE AVENUE/FERN STREET   O OLIVE AVENUE/TANGLEWOOD COURT   O OLIVE AVENUE /TRINITY PLACE   O OLIVE AVENUE/LAKEVIEW AVENUE   O OLIVE AVENUE/OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD   5. COMMITTED TRIPS FROM APPROVED DEVELOPMENTS SHOULD BE   INCLUDED IN THE ANALYSIS.   SITE PLAN COMMENTS:   6. IF SMALL CAR PARKING SPACES ARE PROVIDED, PLEASE   TALLY THE STANDARD AND SMALL CAR PARKING SPACES   SEPARATELY.   7. VERIFY THE REQUIRED PARKING CALCULATION.   8. PROVIDE TURN-AROUND AND BACKUP SPACE AT DEAD-END   PARKING AISLES, E.G. AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER ON THE   GROUND FLOOR AND NORTHWEST CORNER ON LEVEL 3.   9. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ON-STREET PARKING SPACES ALONG   OLIVE AVENUE.   10. DIMENSION SIDEWALK WIDTHS. SIDEWALK SHOULD BE   8-FOOT MINIMUM.   11. PROVIDE SIDEWALK EASEMENT FOR THE PORTION OF   SIDEWALK WITHIN THE PRIVATE PROPERTY.   12. THE SIDEWALK SHOULD CONTINUE AT THE SAME LEVEL   ACROSS THE TWO DRIVEWAYS. THESE SIDEWALK CROSSINGS   SHOULD MAINTAIN THE SAME WIDTH AS THE SIDEWALK, BUT   SHOULD BE NO LESS THAN 5 FEET IF CONSTRAINED AT THE   CROSSINGS.   13. CLARIFY HOW GARBAGE WOULD BE PICKED UP. SHOW   AUTOTURN PATH FOR SERVICE VEHICLE AS APPLICABLE.   14. PROVIDE ONE-WAY SIGN ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE   STREET AT THE EGRESS LOCATIONS.   15. ONE LOADING ZONE IS REQUIRED FOR THE COMMERCIAL USE   PER CITY CODE 94-485.   16. SHOW PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION ROUTES TO THE BUILDING   ELEVATORS.   17. SHOW BICYCLE CIRCULATION ROUTES TO THE BICYCLE   PARKING.   18. INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE BIKE SHARING STATION   AND CAR SHARING STATION. CONSIDER PROVIDING BICYCLE   CORRAL IN LIEU OF BIKE SHARING STATION.   19. BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENT FOR MICRO-UNITS IS 0.5   BICYCLE PARKING SPACES PER EVERY UNIT PER CITY CODE   94-106.   20. IF PARKING GARAGE WOULD BE GATED, PLEASE INDICATE   THE LOCATION OF THE GATE.   21. THE ONE-WAY WESTBOUND INTERNAL DRIVE AISLE NEAR THE   TRASH AREA MAY NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT SIGHT DISTANCE   LOOKING SOUTH FOR VEHICLES COMING OFF THE SPEED RAMP   DUE TO THE TRASH RECEPTACLE, WHICH MAY CAUSE SAFETY   ISSUE. PLEASE VERIFY AND REVISE.   22. DO NOT ENTER SIGN SHOULD BE PROVIDED FOR ONE-WAY   INTERNAL DRIVE AISLE.   23. SHOW RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH FROM CENTERLINE AND FULL   RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH.   24. SHOW ROADWAY CENTERLINE ON SITE PLAN, AND VERIFY IF   THE BUILDING MEETINGS THE SETBACK REQUIREMENT PER CITY   CODE 94-305(D). ALSO, VERIFY IF THE PORCH AREA ALONG   OLIVE AVENUE MEETS CITY CODE 94-305(B)(7), WHICH   PROHIBITS ENCROACHMENT OF THE SETBACK AREA BY THE   PORCHES CLOSER THAN 2 FEET TO THE PROPERTY LINE.   25. CONTRIBUTION TO TROLLEY WOULD BE REQUIRED PER CITY   CODE.   26. CONSIDER PROVIDING TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT   (TDM) STRATEGIES, INCLUDING:   A. UNBUNDLE PARKING SPACES   B. PROVIDE TRANSIT PASS SUBSIDY   C. PROVIDE SHARED MOBILITY SUBSIDY           LINA M. CAMACHO   SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER   561-494-1129   [email protected]       SHING TSOI   CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT   561-494-1141   [email protected]   (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS)     Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 4 Status P Date 03-19-2020 Cont ID   Sent By elevesqu Date 03-19-2020 Time 09:55 Rev Time 0.00 Received By elevesqu Date 03-19-2020 Time 09:55 Sent To   Notes 2020-03-19 09:55:48 A. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHALL BE ADDRESSED DURING THE   BUILDING PERMIT PROCESS:   1. THE SCREENING OF ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL   CONTINUE TO BE COORDINATED IF THE RAISED PARAPET DOES   NOT PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SCREENING.       2. THE PLACEMENT OF ALL UTILITIES, INCLUDING IRRIGATION   METERS, SHALL CONTINUE TO BE COORDINATED TO REMAIN OFF   OF THE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY AND SCREENED TO THE FULLEST   EXTENT POSSIBLE. FDC SHALL BE WALL MOUNTED AND IF   POSSIBLE, PAINTED TO MATCH THE BUILDING COLOR.       3. THE TWELVE CABBAGE PALMS MUST BE INCORPORATED WITHIN   THE WESTERN BUFFER IN A WAY WHERE SUFFICIENT SCREENING   OF THE PARKING GARAGE IS STILL MAINTAINED.       4. THE APPLICANT SHALL WORK WITH CITY STAFF TO CONTINUE   TO EXPLORE OPTIONS FOR THE RELOCATION OF THE LARGE LIVE   OAK TREE #18 TO AN OFF-SITE LOCATION.       5. THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A CORRECTED LANDSCAPE   PLAN SHOWING THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF PLANT MATERIAL   ADDED THAT IS FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT   SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF   SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA   WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA   LANDSCAPES.       6. THE PHOTOMETRICS SHALL BE COORDINATED TO PROVIDE   STREET LIGHTS ALONG THE ROW OF TRINITY PLACE AND WITHIN   THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE (NOT THROUGH EXTERIOR OR INTERIOR   BUILDING LIGHTING).       7. THE APPLICANT SHALL CONSIDER PROVIDING   TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) STRATEGIES TO   MEET THE MODE SHIFT GOAL OF 50% AND PROVIDE ANNUAL   USAGE STATISTICS TO THE CITY, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED   TO: (TRAFFIC ENGINEERING)   A. UNBUNDLE PARKING SPACES   B. PROVIDE TRANSIT PASS SUBSIDY   C. PROVIDE SHARED MOBILITY SUBSIDY       8. THE APPLICANT SHALL CONDUCT A CURBSIDE MANAGEMENT   STUDY TO EVALUATION THE UTILIZATION OF CURBSIDE   ANNUALLY AFTER THE FIRST CO IS ISSUED UNTIL ONE YEAR   AFTER THE LAST CO IS ISSUED (TRAFFIC ENGINEERING)       9. THE APPLICANT SHALL REMOVE THE THREE PARKING SPACES   MARKED AS "FUTURE CAR SHARE" AND ONE PARKING SPACE   MARKED AS "RESIDENTIAL PARKING GUEST" THAT ARE LOCATED   BY THE OVERHANG GATE, OR RELOCATE THE OVERHANG GATE TO   ELIMINATE CONFLICTS. IF THE SPACES ARE REMOVED, THREE   OTHER GUEST SPACES MUST BE RESERVED FOR ?FUTURE CARE   SHARE? AND ONE ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACE MUST BE   RESERVED FOR ?GUEST PARKING?.       10. THE LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS FOR THE TRASH PICKUP   SHALL BE PROVIDED TO PUBLIC WORKS TO DETERMINE CAPACITY   NEEDED FOR TRASH BINS. THE MINIMUM TRASH ROOM HEIGHT   CLEARANCE FOR CEILING AND DOOR SHALL BE 10 FEET.       11. THE CONTEXTUAL ELEVATIONS ALONG TRINITY PLACE   FACING WEST SHALL BE UPDATED TO CORRECT THE DISTANCE   BETWEEN THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE AND THE EXISTING TWO   CITY PLAZA.       12. THE APPLICANT SHALL REMOVE ONE OF THE TWO LOUVERED   DOORS LEADING TO THE FPL TRANSFORMER ROOM TO REDUCE THE   AMOUNT OF LOUVRES ALONG THE NORTH FA?ADE. THIS COULD BE   REPLACED WITH A FAUX GLASS WINDOW OR OTHER OPTIONS THAT   CAN BE EXPLORED WITH CITY ZONING STAFF TO FURTHER   ENHANCE THE FACADE.       13. THE APPLICANT SHALL CONSIDER THE ADDITION OF ONE   MORE DOOR LEADING TO THE RETAIL/RESTAURANT SPACE ALONG   TANGLEWOOD COURT.       14. THE PUBLIC BICYCLE RACKS ALONG OLIVE AVENUE CAN BE   RELOCATED TO A SUITABLE LOCATION IN ORDER TO AVOID THE   NEED FOR CONCRETE BASE PADS WITHIN THE PAVER AREA, OR   OTHERWISE CAN BE MOUNTED WITHIN THE PAVERS (WITHOUT THE   CONCRETE BASE).       15. THE PERMIT PLANS SHALL BE UPDATED THROUGHOUT THE   PERMITTING PROCESS AS THE PROPOSED GARAGE SCREENING   ALONG OLIVE AND TRINITY IS SELECTED AS PART OF THE AIPP   PROCESS. AN AMENDMENT OF THE ELEVATION AND RENDERING   SHALL BE SUBMITTED AS A PERMIT AMENDMENT, IF THE   BUILDING PERMIT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY TIME OF AIPP   APPROVAL BY CITY COMMISSION.       16. THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF THE MICROMOBILITY   STATION WITHIN THE SITE?S ROW SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH   CITY ENGINEERING AND CITY ZONING.       17. THE PARKING GARAGE ENTRANCE SHALL BE TREATED,   INCLUDING THE CEILING FOR THE FIRST 20 FEET. ALL   PORTIONS OF THE PARKING GARAGE THAT CAN BE SEEN FROM   THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK OR STREET SHALL BE TREATED   INCLUDING THE CEILING, AT MINIMUM TO THE FIRST 20 FEET.   ALL GARAGE LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED FROM THE PUBLIC   SIDEWALK AND STREETS.       18. THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY   INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED TO SERVE THE   PROJECT.       19. ALL STREET LIGHTS, TREE GRATES, BOLLARDS, PAVERS OR   ANY OTHER STREETSCAPE ELEMENTS INSTALLED WITHIN THE   CITY?S ROW SHALL COMPLY WITH CITY?S STANDARDS, AND   SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DIVISION AND THE   ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT DURING THE BUILDING   PERMIT PROCESS. ANY FEES ASSOCIATED WITH THE REMOVAL OF   EXISTING STREET LIGHTS SHALL BE A COST TO THE OWNER.       20. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST BUILDING PERMIT,   THE APPLICANT SHALL PREPARE A CONSTRUCTION SITE   SECURITY AND MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY   OF WEST PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT CPTED OFFICIAL.       21. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE   STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND   IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.       22. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON   THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE   SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.       23. IRRIGATION FOR STREET TREES AND LANDSCAPING IN THE   RIGHT OF WAYS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT,   SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS FROM THE SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT.   ALL EXISTING CITY IRRIGATION LINES RUNNING TO   INDIVIDUAL AREAS OR TREES SHALL BE REMOVED AND CAPPED   IN SUCH A WAY TO ENSURE CITY IRRIGATION SUPPLY LINES   SHALL REMAIN INTACT AND CONTINUOUS FOR OTHER AREAS   SERVED BY THE LINES       B. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHALL BE ADDRESSED THROUGH CITY   ENGINEERING PERMIT REVIEW:       24. THE OWNER SHALL COORDINATE WITH CITY ENGINEERING IF   THE OWNER PROPOSES THE POSSIBLE USE OF THE TWO ON   STREET PARKING SPACES ALONG TRINITY PLACE AS A LOADING   AREA.       25. THE CURB LINE ALONG TRINITY PLACE AT S. OLIVE AVE   MAY NEED TO BE ADJUSTED TO ALIGN WITH THE PROPOSED TOP   FOR THE EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE.       26. SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN EASEMENTS ON   THE PERIMETER SECTIONS ON SHEET C8.00.       27. TRENCH DRAIN AT THE SOUTH DRIVEWAY MAY NOT BE   NECESSARY SINCE IT IS LOCATED SO FAR INTO THE GARAGE.   GRADE THE DRIVEWAY TO DRAIN TO THE CONTROL STRUCTURE.       28. CONSIDER SLOPING THE STORMWATER PIPES BETWEEN THE   CONTROL STRUCTURE AND EXISTING CATCH BASIN ON TRINITY   PLACE.       29. CONSIDER FLATTENING THE SLOPE OF THE PARKING AREA   IN PERIMETER SECTION B-B TO 2% AND STEEPENING THE SLOPE   OF THE LANDSCAPE AREA BEHIND THE CURB.       30. SHOW SWALE TYPE CROSS SECTIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE   AREAS TO CAPTURE AND RETAIN/DETAIN RUNOFF FROM THE   SIDEWALK AREAS.       31. GRATE ELEVATION (11.50? NAVD) OF THE NORTH TRENCH   DRAIN APPEARS TO BE LOWER THAN THE ADJACENT DRIVEWAY   GRADES.       C. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHALL BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO   ISSUANCE OF FINAL CO:   32. THE OWNER SHALL WORK WITH CITY STAFF TO KEEP   TANGLEWOOD COURT, TRINITY PLACE AND OLIVE AVENUE OPEN   FOR VEHICLES AND PEDESTRIANS BY MEANS OF SCAFFOLDING OR   OTHER MEASURES TO THE MOST EXTENT POSSIBLE THROUGHOUT   THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS.       33. THE OWNER SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE CITY PARKING   ADMINISTRATION FOR THE REMOVAL AND RELOCATION OF   ON-STREET PARKING SPACES.       34. THE PROJECT SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENT FOR ART IN   PUBLIC PLACES.       35. THE OWNER SHALL CONTRIBUTE A TROLLEY FEE AT $10 PER   MICRO-UNIT PER MONTH. THIS PAYMENT METHOD SHALL BE   ESTABLISHED PRIOR TO CO.       36. RECORDED SIDEWALK/ACCESS EASEMENTS SHALL BE   REQUIRED AND ALL OTHER EASEMENTS DEEMED NECESSARY BY   THE CITY SURVEYOR.       37. PAVEMENT SHALL BE RESURFACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH   CITY STANDARDS TO ANY AREA WHERE PAVEMENT MARKINGS ARE   REMOVED.       38. THE OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CAPTURING ANY   MAJOR GRADE CHANGES WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING   AND KEEP THE PUBLIC AREAS OF THE LOT FREE OF   TRIP-HAZARD CURB LINES OR ANY RAMPS.       39. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE   RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF   WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO THE   DEVELOPMENT. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE   MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.     Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 3 Status F Date 03-02-2020 Cont ID   Sent By elevesqu Date 03-02-2020 Time 15:57 Rev Time 0.00 Received By elevesqu Date 03-02-2020 Time 15:57 Sent To   Notes 2020-03-02 15:57:57 COMMENT RESULTS, NEW COMMENTS AND FURTHER CLARIFICATION   IN BOLD.   1. SATSIFIED.   2. SATSIFIED.   3. SATSIFIED. EXISTING STREET LIGHT POLES SHALL BE   REPLACED WITH THE CITY APPROVED LIGHT POLE, PER CITY   ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS.   LIGHT POLES TO BE REVIEWED THROUGH PERMITTING.   4. ONGOING. PLEASE PROVIDE PHOTOMETRICS FOR THE SITE   AND ROW MEETING REQUIREMENT OF SECTION 94-113(B).   PLEASE INCLUDE LIGHT POLE DETAILS FOR BOTH INTERNAL AND   ROW LIGHT POLES.   SEE NEW COMMENT #101   5. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. SIDEWALK MUST BE AT GRADE   INCLUDING ACROSS PARKING INGRESS/EGRESS AREAS. IT   APPEARS THERE ARE ISSUES AT THE GARAGE ENTRANCES THAT   REQUIRE CURBING AND STAIRS. THIS WILL NEED TO BE   ADJUSTED TO KEEP THE GRADE LEVEL.   REPEAT COMMENT: THE DESIGN OF THE CURB CUT OFF OF   TRINITY PLACE INTO THE PARKING GARAGE DOES NOT ALLOW   FOR CONTINUOUS PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL. PLEASE REMOVE CURBING   AS NECESSARY TO PERMIT FOR CONTINUOUS PATH OF TRAVEL   FROM THE WESTERN BOUNDARY ALONG TRINITY PLACE. PLEASE   REFLECT DESIGN WITH THE LANDSCAPE PLAN   6. SATSIFIED.   7. SATSIFIED.   8. SATSIFIED.   9. SATSIFIED.   10. SATSIFIED.   11. SATSIFIED.   12. SATSIFIED.   13. SATSIFIED.   14. SATSIFIED.   15. ONGOING. PLEASE SHOW PROPOSED LOCATION OF BACKFLOW   PREVENTER AND TRANSFORMER AND OTHER ABOVE GROUND   UTILITIES. PLEASE NOTE, LOCATION OF THESE UTILITIES   SHALL REQUIRE COORDINATION WITH ENGINEERING, PUBLIC   UTILITIES, AND PLANNING AND ZONING TO ENSURE LOCATION   THAT DOES NOT IMPEDE THE PUBLIC REALM AND THAT ALL   UTILITIES ARE PROPERLY SCREENED.       3/2/20: COORDINATE WITH CITY ENGINEERING FOR PLACEMENT   WITHIN INTERIOR OF PARKING GARAGE IF AT ALL POSSIBLE TO   KEEP UTILITIES OFF OF PUBLIC ROW . SEE NEW COMMENT #94   16. SATSIFIED.   17. SATSIFIED.   18. SATSIFIED.   19. SATSIFIED.   20. SATSIFIED.   21. SATSIFIED.       22. SATSIFIED.   23. SATSIFIED.   24. SATSIFIED.   25. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. THE CALCULATION FOR REQUIRED   PARKING FOR MICRO-UNITS, STANDARD UNITS, AND   RETAIL/COMMERCIAL ARE INCORRECT. THE PERMITTED PARKING   FOR MICROUNITS IS 102 SPACES FOR UNITS AND 10 SPACES   FOR GUESTS FOR A TOTAL OF 112 SPACES (ADJUST IN   REQUIRED COLUMN). THE PERMITTED PARKING FOR STANDARD   SPACES IS MIN. 14 AND MAX. 28 PLUS 1 SPACE FOR GUEST   FOR A TOTAL OF 29 SPACES. THE PERMITTED PARKING FOR   RETAIL IS MIN. 12 AND MAX. 24 (ROUNDED DOWN). PLEASE   AMEND ACCORDINGLY AND NOTE THAT ANY PARKING SPACES   ABOVE MAXIMUM PARKING SHALL COUNT TOWARDS FAR. THE   NUMBER OF SPACES ARE ONLY ROUNDED UP IF DECIMAL POINT   IS EQUAL TO OR ABOVE 0.5.       3/2/20: SEE NEW COMMENT # 87   26. SATSIFIED.   27. SATSIFIED.   28. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION   OF THE BIKE SHARE STATION ON THE SITE PLAN. EFFORTS CAN   BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY?S CURRENT BIKE SHARE   PROGRAM. THE TOTAL NUMBER OF DOCKS REQUIRED WILL BE   DETERMINED BY THE PROXIMITY OF OTHER BIKE SHARING   STATIONS ALREADY INSTALLED WITHIN 500 FEET FROM THE   SUBJECT PROJECT.       3/2/20: COORDINATE WITH KIMLEY-HORN ON LOCATION OF   MICROMOBILITY STATION   29. SATSIFIED.   30. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. PER SECTION 94-106(8A), THE   REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING FOR THE RESIDENTIAL   MICRO-UNITS SHALL BE 0.5 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES PER   MICRO-UNIT, WHICH WOULD BE 102 SPACES FOR THIS PROJECT.   PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY. THIS SHALL REQUIRE A COVERED   AND ENCLOSED BICYCLE STORAGE AREA.       3/2/20: BICYCLE RACK POST SHALL BE MIN. 3 FEET AWAY   FROM PERPENDICULAR WALL AND 2 FEET FROM PARALLEL WALL.   30? MINIMUM BETWEEN TWO RACK POSTS. PLEASE ADJUST AS   NECESSARY ? THIS IS IMPORTANT FOR INSTALLATION       31. SATSIFIED.   32. SATSIFIED.   33. SATSIFIED.   34. SATSIFIED.   35. SATSIFIED.   36. SATSIFIED.   37. SATSIFIED.   38. SATSIFIED.   39. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SPECIFIC   ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL INCLUDING ALL MATERIALS AND   INCLUDE REFERENCE IMAGES. STAFF HAS CONCERN OVER THE   MATERIAL FOR THE GARAGE SCREENING AND NEEDS TO SEE MORE   DETAIL OF THE SPACING OF THE FEATURES, PROPOSED   MATERIAL, ETC.   WAITING FOR UPDATED ARCHITECTURAL PLANS   40. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. PLEASE CONSIDER ARCHITECTURAL   FEATURES OTHER THAN GARAGE SCREENING ON THE PARKING   GARAGE FA?ADE TO BETTER BLEND THE OBVIOUS FACADE OF   PARKING GARAGE SCREENING AS SEEN FROM THE PUBLIC VIEW,   ESPECIALLY FROM OLIVE AVENUE AND TRINITY PLACE, WHILE   KEEPING THE MASSING DIFFERENT INTACT.   WAITING FOR UPDATED ARCHITECTURAL PLANS   41. SATSIFIED.   42. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. THE PARKING GARAGE RAMPS SHALL   BE COVERED WITH ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT. BLANK WALLS   ARE NOT PERMITTED PER SECTION 94-109. NON-ACTIVE USES   SHALL BE TREATED WITH ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT PER TABLE   IV-4.   WAITING FOR UPDATED ARCHITECTURAL PLANS   43. SATSIFIED.   44. SATSIFIED. PLEASE EXTEND ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT   ALONG THE FA?ADE AREA ADJACENT TO THE PARKING GARAGE   ALONG OLIVE STREET TO ALLEVIATE THE BLANK WALL.   45. ONGOING. PLEASE NOTE, PER RESOLUTION 211-17,   PROJECTS WITH RESIDENTIAL MICRO-UNITS SHALL CONTRIBUTE   A TROLLEY FEE AT $10 PER MICRO-UNIT PER MONTH.   SHALL BE CONDITION OF APPROVAL   46. SATISFIED.   47. SATISFIED.   48. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE SUBMIT STREET LEVEL   RENDERINGS WITH RESUBMITTAL   PLEASE INCLUDE THE CORRECT LIGHT POLE DESIGN, REMOVE   THE LARGE TREE IF NOT BEING RELOCATED AND REPLACE WITH   IMAGE OF PROPOSED TREE AT PLANTING HEIGHT. PLEASE   ILLUSTRATE THE LANDSCAPE AT PLANTING HEIGHT.   NEW COMMENTS DECEMBER 11, 2019:   49. ONGOING. PLEASE UPDATE THE RENDERING IF THE OAK   TREE IS NOT BEING RELOCATED.   50. SATISFIED.   51. SATISFIED   52. ONGOING. PLEASE INDICATE WHAT MATERIAL WILL BE   BEHIND THE BAMBOO SCREENING (IF ANY)   WAITING FOR UPDATED ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS SHOWING   CMU WALL   53. SATISFIED.   54. ONGOING. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL   MATERIAL DETAIL   WAITING FOR UPDATED ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS   55. ONGOING. STAFF OVERALL FEELS THAT THERE IS A NEED   FOR ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL FENESTRATION AND TREATMENT   ALONG THE NORTH, SOUTH AND WEST FA?ADE. ALTHOUGH SOME   PORTIONS ARE INTERIOR LOT LINES, THE FACADES ARE BEHIND   PARKING LOTS AND THE FA?ADE IS HIGHLY VISIBLE FROM THE   STREET. LANDSCAPE MATERIAL AND PAINT CANNOT BE   CONSIDERED AS TREATMENT FOR COVERING BLANK WALLS. THE   TREATMENT ALONG THE NORTH PORTION OF THE EAST FA?ADE   (THE PORTION WITH THE MESH GARAGE SCREENING) HAS   ACCOMPLISHED THE CONTINUATION OF THE FEATURES   THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE FA?ADE, EFFICIENTLY BLENDING THE   PORTION OF THE PARKING GARAGE INTO THE RESIDENTIAL   UNITS IN THE UPPER FLOORS (GARAGE OPENINGS SAME SIZE AS   WINDOWS ON UPPER FLOORS). THE PORTIONS OF PARKING   GARAGE ALONG THE OTHER FACADES HAS DIFFERENT PATTERN   THAN THE UPPER FLOORS, AND DOES NOT TREAT THE PARKING   GARAGE PORTION AS EFFICIENTLY. PLEASE CONSIDER THE   PATTERN OF PARKING GARAGE SCREENING OPENINGS AND   CONSIDER INCLUSION OF ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL   TREATMENT ALONG NON-ACTIVE USES AND FENESTRATION ALONG   ACTIVE USES (SEE TABLE IV-4). CAN OTHER MATERIAL   BESIDES STUCCO BE USED ALONG FACADES?   WAITING FOR UPDATED ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS   56. ONGOING.PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON THE   PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE MESH SCREENING INCLUDING THE   DISTANCE SEPARATION BETWEEN THE MESH FRAMES. IS THERE   AN ALTERNATIVE SCREENING THAT CAN BE USED THAT BETTER   SERVES AS FAUX WINDOWS OR CONTINUATION?   WAITING FOR UPDATED ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS   57. SATISFIED.   58. SATISFIED.   59. ONGOING.PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR THE ROOF   MOUNTED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. PLEASE MAKE NOTE ON THE   PLANS THAT THE ELEVATOR SHAFTS AND ALL PROJECTING   OBJECTS ON THE ROOF WILL NEED TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH   THE BUILDING FA?ADE COLORS OR OTHERWISE PROPERLY   SCREENED.   WAITING FOR UPDATED ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS   60. SATISFIED.   61. NOT SATISFIED. THE PORTION OF THE GROUND FLOOR OPEN   SPACE THAT IS BEING COUNTED TOWARDS THE REQUIRED   PERCENTAGE OF PRIVATE OPEN SPACE MUST BE TREATED AS A   SPECIFIC TYPE OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE THAT IS PERMITTED IN   THIS ZONING DISTRICT (SEE TABLE IV-6), NOT AS A   SEMI-PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. SPECIFIC DETAILS ON THE PUBLIC   OPEN SPACE TYPE MUST BE INCLUDED (SEE TABLE IV-7).   MUST BE PUBLIC, NOT SEMI PUBLIC AND MEETING THE   REQUIREMENTS FOR VEGETATION AND TREE CANOPY (MINIMUM   SIZE DOES NOT HAVE TO BE MET)   62. SATISFIED.   63. SATISFIED.   64. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE AMEND THE TRUNCATED DOME AND   ADA RAMP AT THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SOUTH ACROSS   TRINITY PLACE AND TANGLEWOOD COURT TO PROVIDE STRAIGHT   ACCESS ACROSS TRINITY AND OLIVE STREET.   PER MEETING WITH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, ADA CROSSING   SHALL FACE DIRECTLY SOUTH.   65. SATISFIED.   66. ONGOING. PLEASE UPDATE THE ARCHITECTURAL SHEET   A1-01 TO MATCH THE UPDATED SITE PLAN DATA   SEE NEW COMMENTS REGARDING PARKING DATA   67. SATISFIED   68. SATISFIED   69. SATISFIED   70. SATISFIED   71. SATISFIED   72. SATISFIED   73. SATISFIED   74. NOT SATISFIED. STAFF RECOMMENDS INCORPORATING ANTI   SKATEBOARD BARRIERS ON THE SEATS IN THE OPEN SPACE-   MAKE NOTES ON THE PLANS IF ADDING   COMMENT WAS NOT ACCURATELY RESPONDED TO IN COMMENT   RESPONSE MEMO   75. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE CONTEXTUAL ELEVATIONS   NEED CONTEXTUAL ELEVATIONS NOT RENDERINGS   76. ONGOING. PLEASE EVALUATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO   INCORPORATE THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER INTO FOUNDATION   LANDSCAPE BED, CLOSER TO THE BUILDING. ALTERNATIVELY,   ANY SOLUTION WHICH ALLOWS IT TO BE SCREENED ON AT LEAST   THREE SIDES BY LANDSCAPE. PLEASE INDICATE PROPOSED   SCREENING ON LANDSCAPE PLANS.   CONVERSATION ONGOING WITH CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT   AND KIMLEY HORN TO LOCATE WITHIN PARKING GARAGE   INTERIOR IF POSSIBLE   77. SATISFIED.   78. NOT SATISFIED. THE NUMBER OF MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM   STANDARD PARKING SPACES FOR RETAIL, RESTAURANT OR   COMMERCIAL SHOULD BE 17 AND 35 PLEASE AMEND   PROVIDED COMMERCIAL PARKING SPACES EXCEED MAXIMUM   REQUIRED. SEE NEW COMMENT #87   79. SATISFIED   80. SATISFIED   81. SATISFIED   82. SATISFIED   83. SATISFIED   84. SATISFIED   NEW COMMENTS MARCH 2, 2020:   85. RESTROOM AREAS ON LEVEL 4 ARE COUNTED TOWARDS FAR.   PLEASE ADJUST FAR SHEET PZ-01 ? THIS WILL PUT THE   PROJECT OVER THE PERMITTED FAR ? NEED TO ADJUST   ELSEWHERE TO REMAIN UNDER MAXIMUM FAR   86. FOR THE MAINTENANCE OFFICE AND POOL EQUIPMENT ROOM,   PLEASE ADD A NOTE THAT ?ROOM SHALL BE NOT UNDER AC?   87. THE PROVIDED COMMERCIAL SPACES EXCEED THE MAXIMUM   SPACES REQUIRED. ANY PARKING SPACES ABOVE THE MAXIMUM   SHALL BE COUNTED TOWARDS FAR.   88. ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MUST BE SCREENED ? PLEASE   RAISE PARAPET TO COVER   89. COORDINATE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS WITH KIMLEY-HORN   PLANS FOR MICRO MOBILITY SPACE   90. INCLUDE DOUBLE STRIPING WITHIN PARKING GARAGE   MEETING STRIPING DETAIL REQUIREMENTS OF CITY OF WPB.   91. IN REGARD TO THE COMPACT PARKING SPACES THAT ARE   AGAINST THE WEST WALL, SOUTH OF THE BICYCLE RACK ROOM:   AS THIS IS A DEAD-END, ONE OF THE SPACES NEED TO BE A   TURNAROUND SPACE (DIAGONALLY STRIPED) WITH A MINIMUM 3   FOOT BACKUP SPACE.   92. APPEARS TO BE BOLLARDS UP AGAINST THE TRASH ROOM   AND DOOR TO THE BICYCLE RACK ROOM ON THE FIRST LEVEL OF   PARKING GARAGE: THESE BLOCK ACCESS TO THE NORTHERN   PARKING SPACE AND DON?T ALLOW FOR SUFFICIENT BACK UP   SPACE. THE PARKING SPACES THAT ARE UP AGAINST THE   SOUTHERN WALL ON THE BUILDING RAMPS ON THE OTHER FLOORS   HAVE THE SAME ISSUE. THE VEHICLES PULLING OUT OF THIS   SPACE WOULD HAVE TO PACK UP STRAIGHT INTO THE OPPOSITE   TURN LANE, UP THE RAMP IN ORDER TO GET OUT OF THE   SPACE. THESE WILL NEED TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED   APPROPRIATELY   93. COORDINATION FOR SIDEWALK ALONG TRINITY PLACE   ONGOING WITH CITY ENGINEERING AND KIMLEY HORN TO ALLOW   FOR CONTINUOUS PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY ALONG SIDEWALK.   94. LOCATE WATER METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTER WITHIN   PARKING GARAGE IF POSSIBLE ? COORDINATE WITH CITY   ENGINEERING   95. THE PARKING SPACES THAT ARE UP AGAINST THE SOUTHERN   WALL ON THE BUILDING RAMPS DO NOT WORK. THE VEHICLES   PULLING OUT OF THIS SPACE WOULD HAVE TO PACK UP   STRAIGHT INTO THE OPPOSITE TURN LANE, UP THE RAMP IN   ORDER TO GET OUT OF THE SPACE. PLEASE ADJUST AS   NECESSARY   96. PLEASE LOCATE EXHAUST FAN TO FACE WEST IF POSSIBLE   RATHER THAN SOUTH TO TRINITY PLACE. PLEASE SHOW ON   ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS   97. PLEASE CLARIFY USE OF STORAGE CASES WITHIN PARKING   GARAGE THAT STILL HAVE COMPACT PARKING SPACES WITHIN?   98. PLEASE NOTE, STAFF WILL REQUEST AN UPDATED   RENDERING WITH THE PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE SCREENING   DURING THE PERMITTING PROCESS, OR IF ARTIST AND DESIGN   IS PICKED AFTER THE PERMIT PROCESS, THIS SHALL BE   SUBMITTED PRIOR TO CO AS A PERMIT REVISION.   99. THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED CAR SHARING IS BASED ON   MICRO-UNITS NOT STANDARD UNITS, SO 15 CAR SHARING   SPACES ARE REQUIRED. THE CAR SHARING REDUCTION IS 7 NOT   8. THIS RESULTS IN A MAXIMUM OF 184 PARKING SPACES.   PLEASE ADJUST NUMBERS ACCORDINGLY IN PARKING TABLE.   100. PLEASE MATCH KIMLEY-HORN PLANS TO ARCHITECTURAL   PLANS IN REGARD TO BICYCLE RACK ALONG THE ROWS.   101. STREET LIGHTING TO BE REVIEWED AT TIME OF   PERMITTING. PHOTOMETRICS NEED TO INCLUDE PUBLIC OPEN   SPACE AREA ALONG OLIVE AVENUE. LIGHT POLES ARE MISSING   FROM TRINITY PLACE.   102. A FEE OF $300 IS REQUIRED FOR ANY RESUBMITTAL   BEYOND THE SECOND SUBMITTAL. PLEASE SUBMIT A CHECK FOR   $300 WITH RESUBMITTAL.       STAFF RESERVES THE RIGHT FOR FURTHER COMMENT AS THE   REVIEW PROGRESSES.     Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 2 Status F Date 12-12-2019 Cont ID   Sent By elevesqu Date 12-12-2019 Time 14:15 Rev Time 0.00 Received By elevesqu Date   Time   Sent To   Notes 2019-12-12 14:15:41 1. SATSIFIED.   2. SATSIFIED.   3. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. EXISTING STREET LIGHT POLES   SHALL BE REPLACED WITH THE CITY APPROVED LIGHT POLE,   PER CITY ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS.   PLEASE INCLUDE SIMILAR LIGHT POLES ON THE RENDERINGS.   4. NOT SATSIFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE PHOTOMETRICS FOR THE   SITE AND ROW MEETING REQUIREMENT OF SECTION 94-113(B).   PLEASE INCLUDE LIGHT POLE DETAILS FOR BOTH INTERNAL AND   ROW LIGHT POLES.   5. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. SIDEWALK MUST BE AT GRADE   INCLUDING ACROSS PARKING INGRESS/EGRESS AREAS. IT   APPEARS THERE ARE ISSUES AT THE GARAGE ENTRANCES THAT   REQUIRE CURBING AND STAIRS. THIS WILL NEED TO BE   ADJUSTED TO KEEP THE GRADE LEVEL.   THE DESIGN OF THE CURB CUT OFF OF TRINITY PLACE INTO   THE PARKING GARAGE DOES NOT ALLOW FOR CONTINUOUS   PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL. PLEASE REMOVE CURBING AS NECESSARY   TO PERMIT FOR CONTINUOUS PATH OF TRAVEL FROM THE   WESTERN BOUNDARY ALONG TRINITY PLACE. PLEASE REFLECT   DESIGN WITH THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, WHICH CURRENTLY DOES   NOT MATCH THE SITE PLAN.   6. SATSIFIED.   7. SATSIFIED.   8. SATSIFIED.   9. SATSIFIED.   10. SATSIFIED.   11. SATSIFIED.   12. SATSIFIED.   13. SATSIFIED.   14. SATSIFIED.   15. ONGOING. PLEASE SHOW PROPOSED LOCATION OF BACKFLOW   PREVENTER AND TRANSFORMER AND OTHER ABOVE GROUND   UTILITIES. PLEASE NOTE, LOCATION OF THESE UTILITIES   SHALL REQUIRE COORDINATION WITH ENGINEERING, PUBLIC   UTILITIES, AND PLANNING AND ZONING TO ENSURE LOCATION   THAT DOES NOT IMPEDE THE PUBLIC REALM AND THAT ALL   UTILITIES ARE PROPERLY SCREENED.   SEE NEW COMMENT # 77   16. SATSIFIED.   17. SATSIFIED.   18. SATSIFIED.   19. SATSIFIED.   20. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE   SHEET INDICATING THE LOCATION OF ACTIVE USE AND   PERCENTAGE ALONG THE FACADES. STAFF CAN PROVIDE AN   EXAMPLE.   SEE NEW COMMENT #62   21. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE   SHEET INDICATING THE LOCATION OF REQUIRED TRANSPARENCY   PERCENTAGE ALONG THE FACADES. TRANSPARENCY IS DEFINED   IN SECTION 94-109. STAFF CAN PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE.   SEE NEW COMMENT # 62       22. SATSIFIED.   23. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE   SHEET INDICATING THE REQUIRED PLANAR BREAKS FOR TABLE   IV-4 ALONG THE FACADES. STAFF CAN PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE.   THE INDICATED PLANAR BREAK ALONG THE NORTH FA?ADE ON   LEVEL 4 MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS, BUT THE DIMENSIONS   APPEAR TO BE LABELED INCORRECTLY (93? 1 1?8? SECTION   SHOULD BE SPLIT INTO TWO SECTIONS BASED ON ILLUSTRATED   BREAK). PLEASE AMEND   24. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE   SHEET INDICATING THE REQUIRED HORIZONTAL PROJECTIONS   FOR TABLE IV-4 ALONG THE FACADES. STAFF CAN PROVIDE AN   EXAMPLE.   SEE NEW COMMENT # 53   25. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. THE CALCULATION FOR REQUIRED   PARKING FOR MICRO-UNITS, STANDARD UNITS, AND   RETAIL/COMMERCIAL ARE INCORRECT. THE PERMITTED PARKING   FOR MICROUNITS IS 102 SPACES FOR UNITS AND 10 SPACES   FOR GUESTS FOR A TOTAL OF 112 SPACES (ADJUST IN   REQUIRED COLUMN). THE PERMITTED PARKING FOR STANDARD   SPACES IS MIN. 14 AND MAX. 28 PLUS 1 SPACE FOR GUEST   FOR A TOTAL OF 29 SPACES. THE PERMITTED PARKING FOR   RETAIL IS MIN. 12 AND MAX. 24 (ROUNDED DOWN). PLEASE   AMEND ACCORDINGLY AND NOTE THAT ANY PARKING SPACES   ABOVE MAXIMUM PARKING SHALL COUNT TOWARDS FAR. THE   NUMBER OF SPACES ARE ONLY ROUNDED UP IF DECIMAL POINT   IS EQUAL TO OR ABOVE 0.5.   SEE NEW COMMENT # 78 & 79   26. SATSIFIED.   27. SATSIFIED.   28. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION   OF THE BIKE SHARE STATION ON THE SITE PLAN. EFFORTS CAN   BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY?S CURRENT BIKE SHARE   PROGRAM. THE TOTAL NUMBER OF DOCKS REQUIRED WILL BE   DETERMINED BY THE PROXIMITY OF OTHER BIKE SHARING   STATIONS ALREADY INSTALLED WITHIN 500 FEET FROM THE   SUBJECT PROJECT.   FROM CONVERSATIONS WITH APPLICANT, IT APPEARS THAT THE   BIKE SHARE STATION MAY BE RELOCATED. THE BEST LOCATION   IN TERMS OF CONVENIENCE IS OLIVE AVENUE. STAFF IS   DISCUSSING INTERNALLY AND WITH THE BIKE SHARE COMPANY   ON THE NUMBER OF RACKS NEEDED AT THIS LOCATION, THE   SIZE NEEDED AND THE BEST LOCATION. CONVERSATION TO BE   CONTINUED       29. SATSIFIED.   30. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. PER SECTION 94-106(8A), THE   REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING FOR THE RESIDENTIAL   MICRO-UNITS SHALL BE 0.5 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES PER   MICRO-UNIT, WHICH WOULD BE 102 SPACES FOR THIS PROJECT.   PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY. THIS SHALL REQUIRE A COVERED   AND ENCLOSED BICYCLE STORAGE AREA.   PLEASE SHOW THE PROPOSED LOCATION AND LAYOUT OF THE   INTERIOR BICYCLE SPACES WITHIN THE PARKING GARAGE.   31. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. THE CALCULATION FOR REQUIRED   CAR SHARE IS INCORRECT. THE CALCULATION SHALL BE A   RATIO OF ONE CAR SHARE SPACE PER EVERY 13 UNITS,   REDUCED BY ONE CAR SHARE SPACE PER EVERY 13 ON-SITE   MICRO-UNIT PARKING SPACES PROVIDED. THIS WOULD RESULT   IN 8 CAR SHARE SPACES. PLEASE PROVIDE 2 SPACES ON SITE,   AND HAVE THE REMAINING 6 TO BE SAVED FOR CAR SHARE FOR   A FUTURE DATE BASED ON THE REQUIREMENTS OF 94-106(8A).   PLEASE AMEND TO SHOW THE REQUIRED 2 SPACES PLUS 6   RESERVED SPACES (WHICH CAN BE USED FOR GUEST PARKING   NOW) IN THE PROJECT DATA TABLE AND SHOW LOCATION OF CAR   SHARE SPACES ON THE SITE PLANS. APPLICANT SHALL   COORDINATE WITH CAR SHARE PROVIDER WITH THE ASSISTANCE   OF THE CITY.   TWO SPACES SHOULD BE RESERVED FOR CAR SHARE SPACES, NOT   ?FUTURE CAR SHARE?.   32. SATSIFIED.   33. SATSIFIED.   34. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. PLEASE COORDINATE TRASH PICKUP   AND REMOVAL WITH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. HOW WOULD   PICKUP WORK FOR THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE ENCLOSURE?   PLEASE COORDINATE WITH MATT HEJAZI. 561-822-2045   [email protected]   THERE IS A LIGHT POLE PROPOSED WITHIN THE COMPACTOR   HOLDING ZONE, PLEASE ADJUST.   35. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. IS THERE ACCESS TO THE RETAIL   FROM THE PARKING GARAGE? HOW WILL ACCESS WORK? PLEASE   LABEL PARKING SPACES FOR RETAIL ON THE SITE PLAN.   THERE ARE RETAIL PARKING SPACES PROPOSED BEYOND THE   ACCESS GATE. WOULD THESE BE RESERVED FOR THOSE WITH   ACCESS? MAY NEED TO BE REVISED   36. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. PUBLIC BICYCLE PARKING SHALL   BE PROVIDED AT ONE SPACE PER 100 FEET OF STREET   FRONTAGE. THIS WOULD BE THE TOTAL OF ALL THREE STREET   FRONTAGES FOR A TOTAL OF 6 BICYCLE SPACES (SECTION   93-113)   THE PROPOSED LOCATION INTERFERES WITH THE PEDESTRIAN   PATHWAY ALONG OLIVE AVENUE. PLEASE ADJUST TO A LOCATION   OUT OF THE DIRECT PATH OF TRAVEL, PERHAPS WITHIN THE   PLAZA AREA ADJACENT TO THE STRUCTURE. ALTERNATIVELY,   BICYCLE RACKS CAN BE DISPERSED AROUND THE PROJECT.   37. SATSIFIED.   38. SATSIFIED.   39. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SPECIFIC   ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL INCLUDING ALL MATERIALS AND   INCLUDE REFERENCE IMAGES. STAFF HAS CONCERN OVER THE   MATERIAL FOR THE GARAGE SCREENING AND NEEDS TO SEE MORE   DETAIL OF THE SPACING OF THE FEATURES, PROPOSED   MATERIAL, ETC.   SEE NEW COMMENT # 55   40. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. PLEASE CONSIDER ARCHITECTURAL   FEATURES OTHER THAN GARAGE SCREENING ON THE PARKING   GARAGE FA?ADE TO BETTER BLEND THE OBVIOUS FACADE OF   PARKING GARAGE SCREENING AS SEEN FROM THE PUBLIC VIEW,   ESPECIALLY FROM OLIVE AVENUE AND TRINITY PLACE, WHILE   KEEPING THE MASSING DIFFERENT INTACT.   SEE NEW COMMENT # 55   41. SATSIFIED.   42. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. THE PARKING GARAGE RAMPS SHALL   BE COVERED WITH ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT. BLANK WALLS   ARE NOT PERMITTED PER SECTION 94-109. NON-ACTIVE USES   SHALL BE TREATED WITH ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT PER TABLE   IV-4.   SEE NEW COMMENT # 55   43. SATSIFIED.   44. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. PLEASE EXTEND ARCHITECTURAL   TREATMENT ALONG THE FA?ADE AREA ADJACENT TO THE PARKING   GARAGE ALONG OLIVE STREET TO ALLEVIATE THE BLANK WALL.   SEE NEW COMMENT # 55   45. ONGOING. PLEASE NOTE, PER RESOLUTION 211-17,   PROJECTS WITH RESIDENTIAL MICRO-UNITS SHALL CONTRIBUTE   A TROLLEY FEE AT $10 PER MICRO-UNIT PER MONTH.   46. SATISFIED.   47. SATISFIED.   48. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE SUBMIT STREET LEVEL   RENDERINGS WITH RESUBMITTAL   PLEASE INCLUDE THE CORRECT LIGHT POLE DESIGN, REMOVE   THE LARGE TREE IF NOT BEING RELOCATED AND REPLACE WITH   IMAGE OF PROPOSED TREE AT PLANTING HEIGHT. PLEASE   ILLUSTRATE THE LANDSCAPE AT PLANTING HEIGHT.           NEW COMMENTS DECEMBER 11, 2019:   49. PLEASE UPDATE THE RENDERING IF THE OAK TREE IS NOT   BEING RELOCATED.   50. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL MATERIAL INFORMATION AND   DETAIL ON THE PROPOSED ?BAMBOO? GARAGE SCREENING,   INCLUDING PROPOSED SPACING. THE RENDERING SHOWS LARGER   SPACING BETWEEN THE ?BAMBOO? PARKING GARAGE SCREENING   ALONG THE EAST FA?ADE, WITHIN THE PUBLIC PLAZA AREA. IS   THE SPACING DIFFERENT HERE THAN ELSEWHERE?   51. PLEASE CLARIFY WHY THE BAMBOO SCREENING IS   ILLUSTRATED IN BLACK AND WHITE COLOR ON SHEET A4-01 OF   COLOR ELEVATIONS ? DIFFERENT THAN RENDERING   52. PLEASE INDICATE WHAT MATERIAL WILL BE BEHIND THE   BAMBOO SCREENING (IF ANY)   53. PER TABLE IV-4: FA?ADE ARTICULATION REQUIREMENTS,   AT THE GROUND FLOOR, HORIZONTAL PROJECTS THAT HAVE A   MINIMUM CUMULATIVE HORIZONTAL LENGTH OF 50% OF THE   BUILDING FRONTAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED (NOT INCLUDING   RECESSED PROJECTIONS FROM REQUIRED SETBACKS). IT   APPEARS THAT THE EAST ELEVATION MAY NOT MEET THIS   REQUIREMENT. PLEASE INCLUDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR   INCLUDE ADDITIONAL HORIZONTAL ELEMENTS ALONG THIS   FA?ADE AS NECESSARY.   54. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL MATERIAL   DETAIL   55. STAFF OVERALL FEELS THAT THERE IS A NEED FOR   ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL FENESTRATION AND TREATMENT   ALONG THE NORTH, SOUTH AND WEST FA?ADE. ALTHOUGH SOME   PORTIONS ARE INTERIOR LOT LINES, THE FACADES ARE BEHIND   PARKING LOTS AND THE FA?ADE IS HIGHLY VISIBLE FROM THE   STREET. LANDSCAPE MATERIAL AND PAINT CANNOT BE   CONSIDERED AS TREATMENT FOR COVERING BLANK WALLS. THE   TREATMENT ALONG THE NORTH PORTION OF THE EAST FA?ADE   (THE PORTION WITH THE MESH GARAGE SCREENING) HAS   ACCOMPLISHED THE CONTINUATION OF THE FEATURES   THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE FA?ADE, EFFICIENTLY BLENDING THE   PORTION OF THE PARKING GARAGE INTO THE RESIDENTIAL   UNITS IN THE UPPER FLOORS (GARAGE OPENINGS SAME SIZE AS   WINDOWS ON UPPER FLOORS). THE PORTIONS OF PARKING   GARAGE ALONG THE OTHER FACADES HAS DIFFERENT PATTERN   THAN THE UPPER FLOORS, AND DOES NOT TREAT THE PARKING   GARAGE PORTION AS EFFICIENTLY. PLEASE CONSIDER THE   PATTERN OF PARKING GARAGE SCREENING OPENINGS AND   CONSIDER INCLUSION OF ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL   TREATMENT ALONG NON-ACTIVE USES AND FENESTRATION ALONG   ACTIVE USES (SEE TABLE IV-4). CAN OTHER MATERIAL   BESIDES STUCCO BE USED ALONG FACADES?   56. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON THE PROPOSED   PARKING GARAGE MESH SCREENING INCLUDING THE DISTANCE   SEPARATION BETWEEN THE MESH FRAMES. IS THERE AN   ALTERNATIVE SCREENING THAT CAN BE USED THAT BETTER   SERVES AS FAUX WINDOWS OR CONTINUATION?   57. THE GATE ALONG THE EAST ELEVATION TO THE AMENITY   DECK CANNOT SWING OUT INTO THE SIDEWALK PEDESTRIAN PATH   OF TRAVEL. PLEASE SET THE GATE BACK SO THE DOOR DOES   NOT SWING DIRECTLY INTO THE SIDEWALK.   58. THE ENTRANCES TO THE RETAIL AREAS ON THE OLIVE   AVENUE FRONTAGE WILL NEED TO BE RECESSED TO PREVENT THE   DOORS FROM OPENING DIRECTLY ONTO THE SIDEWALK.   59. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR THE ROOF MOUNTED   MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. PLEASE MAKE NOTE ON THE PLANS   THAT THE ELEVATOR SHAFTS AND ALL PROJECTING OBJECTS ON   THE ROOF WILL NEED TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH THE BUILDING   FA?ADE COLORS OR OTHERWISE PROPERLY SCREENED.   60. PLEASE NOTE THAT PARKING GARAGES ENTRANCES SHALL BE   REQUIRED TO BE TREATED (WALLS AND CEILINGS) TO A DEPTH   OF AT LEAST 20 FEET.   61. THE PORTION OF THE GROUND FLOOR OPEN SPACE THAT IS   BEING COUNTED TOWARDS THE REQUIRED PERCENTAGE OF   PRIVATE OPEN SPACE MUST BE TREATED AS A SPECIFIC TYPE   OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE THAT IS PERMITTED IN THIS ZONING   DISTRICT (SEE TABLE IV-6), NOT AS A SEMI-PUBLIC OPEN   SPACE. SPECIFIC DETAILS ON THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TYPE   MUST BE INCLUDED (SEE TABLE IV-7).   62. PLEASE REMOVE THE STAIRWAY ALONG THE NORTH FA?ADE   FROM THE CALCULATION FOR ACTIVE USE AND TRANSPARENCY AS   IT DOES NOT COUNT TOWARDS ACTIVE USE. PLEASE UPDATE   ACTIVE USE CALCULATION IN DATA TABLES TO REFLECT   63. THE TRENCH DRAIN AT THE PARKING GARAGE ENTRANCE OFF   TRINITY PLACE IS ILLUSTRATED WITH A DIFFERENT DIMENSION   ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND CIVIL PLANS. PLEASE   CLARIFY.   64. PLEASE AMEND THE TRUNCATED DOME AND ADA RAMP AT THE   PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SOUTH ACROSS TRINITY PLACE AND   TANGLEWOOD COURT TO PROVIDE STRAIGHT ACCESS ACROSS   TRINITY AND OLIVE STREET.   65. THERE ARE ISSUES WITH THE PROPOSED LIGHT POLE   LOCATIONS (WITHIN PARKING SPACES, TRASH COMPACTOR   HOLDING SPACE, SAME LOCATION AS TREES, FIRE HYDRANT,   ETC.). PLEASE RELOCATE APPROPRIATELY   66. PLEASE UPDATE THE ARCHITECTURAL SHEET A1-01 TO   MATCH THE UPDATED SITE PLAN DATA   67. PLEASE REMOVE THE REFERENCE FOR THE TRASH CHUTE   FROM THE ROOF ON SHEET A1-09   68. THERE ARE NOTES ON SHEET C2.00 FOR EXISTING TREE   GRATES TO REMAIN. PLEASE NOTE THAT THESE WILL NEED TO   BE EVALUATED INDIVIDUALLY FOR THEIR EXISTING CONDITION   AND MAY NEED TO BE REPLACED ? CONVERSATION WITH   PLANNING AND LANDSCAPE PLANNER WILL BE REQUIRED TO   DETERMINE CONDITION   69. PLEASE INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL 1 FOOT OF SPACE NEXT   TO ANY WALLS OR PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION ADJACENT TO   PARKING SPACES (SECTION 94-111(C)(1).   70. PLEASE MAKE NOTE ON THE PLANS THAT ANY WALL MOUNTED   FDC OR OTHER UTILITIES SHALL BE PAINTED TO MATCH THE   BUILDING FA?ADE COLOR   71. A SPECIFIC BICYCLE RACK DETAIL WILL NEED TO BE   PROVIDED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL, PLEASE   PROVIDE WHEN CHOSEN   72. THE BICYCLE RACK LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE   PLAN DO NOT MATCH THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE AMEND   73. HAS FENCING OR OTHER METHODS BEEN CONSIDERED FOR   THE LANDSCAPE AREA ALONG THE SIDE PROPERTY LINE FROM   TANGLEWOOD COURT? WHAT ARE THE SECURITY MEASURES   PROPOSED FOR THIS AREA, AS IT COULD PROVIDE SPACE FOR   LOITERING?   74. STAFF RECOMMENDS INCORPORATING ANTI SKATEBOARD   BARRIERS ON THE SEATS IN THE OPEN SPACE- MAKE NOTES ON   THE PLANS IF ADDING   75. PLEASE PROVIDE CONTEXTUAL ELEVATIONS   76. PLEASE EVALUATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO INCORPORATE THE   BACKFLOW PREVENTER INTO FOUNDATION LANDSCAPE BED,   CLOSER TO THE BUILDING. ALTERNATIVELY, ANY SOLUTION   WHICH ALLOWS IT TO BE SCREENED ON AT LEAST THREE SIDES   BY LANDSCAPE. PLEASE INDICATE PROPOSED SCREENING ON   LANDSCAPE PLANS.   77. THE CALCULATION FOR MAXIMUM STANDARD PARKING SPACES   FOR THE MICRO-UNITS SHOULD BE 98 SPACES (ONLY CALCULATE   USING NUMBER OF MICRO UNITS). PLEASE AMEND   78. THE NUMBER OF MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM STANDARD PARKING   SPACES FOR RETAIL, RESTAURANT OR COMMERCIAL SHOULD BE   17 AND 35 PLEASE AMEND   79. THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED MICROUNIT BICYCLE PARKING   SPACES IS ONLY PER MICROUNIT, NOT STANDARD UNIT,   RESULTING IN A REQUIREMENT OF 98 SPACES. THE STANDARD   UNITS ALSO REQUIRE BICYCLES AT 1 RACK PER EVERY 15   REQUIRED PARKING SPACES (1 SPACE). PLEASE PROVIDE A   SEPARATE ROW IN THE DATA TABLE FOR 98 REQUIRED BICYCLE   RACKS FOR MICROUNITS AND 1 REQUIRED FOR STANDARD UNITS.   THIS IS IN ADDITION TO THE REQUIRED FOR COMMERCIAL   BICYCLE PARKING.   80. PLEASE CONSIDER AN ADDITIONAL TREE AT THE PROJECT?S   SOUTHEAST CORNER, ALONG TRINITY PLACE NEAR THE CROSSING   TO PROVIDE SHADE FOR PEDESTRIANS WAITING AT THE   CROSSWALK   81. PLEASE ADD AN ADDITIONAL TREE IN A TREE GRATE   ADJACENT TO THE SOUTHERNMOST PARALLEL PARKING SPACE   ALONG OLIVE AVENUE   82. THERE APPEARS TO BE SOME ELEVATED FEATURES ALONG   THE SIDEWALK BETWEEN THE ELEVATOR LOBBY ENTRANCE AND   THE STAIRWELL ENTRANCE ILLUSTRATED ON THE NORTH   ELEVATION ON SHEET PZ-02A. WHAT ARE THESE OBJECTS?   83. MAY WANT TO CONSIDER THE ONE-WAY PAVEMENT STRIPING   ALONG TRINITY PLACE AND TANGLEWOOD COURT TO BE DIRECTLY   IN FRONT OF THE PARKING GARAGE EXIT. SUGGEST CONFIRMING   WITH CITY ENGINEERING ABOUT PROPER PLACEMENT.   84. A FEE OF $300 IS REQUIRED FOR ANY RESUBMITTAL   BEYOND THE SECOND SUBMITTAL. PLEASE SUBMIT A CHECK FOR   $300 WITH RESUBMITTAL.       STAFF RESERVES THE RIGHT FOR FURTHER COMMENT AS THE   REVIEW PROGRESSES.     Review Stop Z ZONING Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-14-2019 Cont ID   Sent By elevesqu Date 08-14-2019 Time 10:21 Rev Time 0.00 Received By elevesqu Date 08-14-2019 Time 10:20 Sent To   Notes 2019-08-14 13:50:17 1. REQUIRED BUILDING SETBACKS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO   INCLUDE FEATURES SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,   SIDEWALKS, STREET TREES, TREE GRATES, LANDSCAPE BUFFERS   AND LIGHTING AS APPROVED BY THE CITY TO SUPPORT THE   PARTICULAR DISTRICT CHARACTER. THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL   REQUIRE ROW IMPROVEMENTS TO ALL ROW INCLUDING OLIVE   STREET. THE APPLICANT SHALL WORK WITH THE PLANNING   DEPARTMENT ON THE DESIGN OF THE STREETSCAPE TO INCLUDE   PLANTER BEDS, REPLACE PAVERS AS NEEDED TO MATCH THE   EXISTING, AND FIX THE SIDEWALK AS NECESSARY. THE   EXISTING CURB CUT ALONG OLIVE STREET SHALL BE REMOVED.   2. AS THE PARKING CALCULATIONS ARE INCORRECT (SEE LATER   COMMENTS), STAFF RECOMMENDS THE REORIENTATION OF THE   PARKING GARAGE TO REMOVE THE COVERED PORTION OF THE   BUILDING ENTRY AT OLIVE STREET AND TRINITY PLACE. THE   AREA CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARDS OPEN SPACE IF IT IS   FULLY COVERED. ADDITIONALLY, THIS WOULD ALLOW FOR THE   RELOCATION OF THE LARGE OAK TREE ON SITE INTO THIS   CORNER SPACE. THE COVERED SPACE DIMINISHES THE   APPEARANCE OF THE SIDEWALK BEING FOR PUBLIC USE.   3. EXISTING STREET LIGHT POLES SHALL BE REPLACED WITH   THE CITY APPROVED LIGHT POLE, PER CITY ENGINEERING   REQUIREMENTS.   4. PLEASE PROVIDE PHOTOMETRICS FOR THE SITE AND ROW   MEETING REQUIREMENT OF SECTION 94-113(B). PLEASE   INCLUDE LIGHT POLE DETAILS FOR BOTH INTERNAL AND ROW   LIGHT POLES.   5. SIDEWALK MUST BE AT GRADE INCLUDING ACROSS PARKING   INGRESS/EGRESS AREAS. IT APPEARS THERE ARE ISSUES AT   THE GARAGE ENTRANCES THAT REQUIRE CURBING AND STAIRS.   THIS WILL NEED TO BE ADJUSTED TO KEEP THE GRADE LEVEL.   6. THE SIDEWALK DOES NOT APPEAR TO MEET THE REQUIRED   EIGHT FEET PATH ADJACENT TO THE PARALLEL PARKING SPOTS   ALONG OLIVE AVENUE WITH THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE BEDS.   PLEASE ADJUST AS NECESSARY.   7. PLEASE USE PLANTER BEDS FOR STREET TREES RATHER THAN   USING TREE GRATES. TREE GRATES ARE ONLY NECESSARY IF   THE MINIMUM EIGHT FOOT PATHWAY CLEARANCE CANNOT BE MET   AND THE GRATES ARE NECESSARY TO WIDEN THE WALKING PATH.   A BREAK IN THE PLANTER BEDS CAN BE USED TO MAINTAIN   PAVER DESIGN. SEE LANDSCAPE COMMENTS FOR SPECIFIC   LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS.   8. THERE ARE STAIRS PROPOSED WITHIN THE REQUIRED   SETBACK ALONG TRINITY PLACE AND TANGLEWOOD COURT.   STAIRS CANNOT BE LOCATED WITHIN THE REQUIRED SETBACK.   9. STAFF HAS CONCERN WITH THE PROPOSED RAMPS INTO THE   BUILDING FROM THE PUBLIC ROW. THE RAMPS SEPARATE THE   ACTIVE USE FROM THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK. THE GRADE   DIFFERENCES SHOULD BE OBSERVED INSIDE THE BUILDING. THE   RAMPS ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE RENDERINGS.   10. PLEASE CONSIDER ADDITIONAL FOUNDATION LANDSCAPE   ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING ALONG OLIVER STREET (SEE   COMMENT 9 FOR REMOVAL OF RAMPS).   11. IT APPEARS THAT DOORWAYS OPEN OUT DIRECTLY INTO   STAIRWAYS. THESE DOORWAYS WOULD NEED TO BE RECESSED IF   THE DOORS OPEN OUTWARDS. PLEASE ADJUST AS NECESSARY.   12. PLEASE INCLUDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE SIDEWALK ON   THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.   13. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAIL OF THE WALK UP GARDENS   INCLUDING THE LOCATION OF STAIRS. PLEASE SEE SECTION   94-109 FOR DEFINITION AND REQUIREMENTS OF WALK-UP   GARDENS.   14. PLEASE ADD LOT FRONTAGE DIMENSIONS TO THE SITE   PLAN.   15. PLEASE SHOW PROPOSED LOCATION OF BACKFLOW PREVENTER   AND TRANSFORMER AND OTHER ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES.   PLEASE NOTE, LOCATION OF THESE UTILITIES SHALL REQUIRE   COORDINATION WITH ENGINEERING, PUBLIC UTILITIES, AND   PLANNING AND ZONING TO ENSURE LOCATION THAT DOES NOT   IMPEDE THE PUBLIC REALM AND THAT ALL UTILITIES ARE   PROPERLY SCREENED.   16. PLEASE FIX THE PROPERTY LINE AT THE SITE?S   NORTHWEST CORNER.   17. PLEASE REDUCE INGRESS/EGRESS POINTS TO 20 FEET   MAXIMUM INTERNALLY AND A MAXIMUM OF 25 FEET AT THE CURB   CUT. SEE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING COMMENTS FOR TRAFFIC   CIRCULATION.   18. PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS AND DETAILS OF EACH FLOOR   PLAN INCLUDING SETBACKS.   19. PLEASE PROVIDE OUTLINE OF UPPER FLOORS ON THE BASE   SITE PLAN AND INDICATE SETBACKS.   20. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE SHEET INDICATING THE   LOCATION OF ACTIVE USE AND PERCENTAGE ALONG THE   FACADES. STAFF CAN PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE.   21. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE SHEET INDICATING THE   LOCATION OF REQUIRED TRANSPARENCY PERCENTAGE ALONG THE   FACADES. TRANSPARENCY IS DEFINED IN SECTION 94-109.   STAFF CAN PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE.   22. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE SHEET WITH A BREAKDOWN OF   FAR CALCULATION PER FLOOR (SEE DEFINITION OF GROSS   SQUARE FEET FOR FAR CALCULATION IN SECTION 94-109).   STAFF CAN PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE.   23. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE SHEET INDICATING THE   REQUIRED PLANAR BREAKS FOR TABLE IV-4 ALONG THE   FACADES. STAFF CAN PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE.   24. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE SHEET INDICATING THE   REQUIRED HORIZONTAL PROJECTIONS FOR TABLE IV-4 ALONG   THE FACADES. STAFF CAN PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE.   25. THE CALCULATION FOR REQUIRED PARKING FOR   MICRO-UNITS, STANDARD UNITS, AND RETAIL/COMMERCIAL ARE   INCORRECT. THE PERMITTED PARKING FOR MICROUNITS IS 102   SPACES FOR UNITS AND 10 SPACES FOR GUESTS FOR A TOTAL   OF 112 SPACES (ADJUST IN REQUIRED COLUMN). THE   PERMITTED PARKING FOR STANDARD SPACES IS MIN. 14 AND   MAX. 28 PLUS 1 SPACE FOR GUEST FOR A TOTAL OF 29   SPACES. THE PERMITTED PARKING FOR RETAIL IS MIN. 12 AND   MAX. 24 (ROUNDED DOWN). PLEASE AMEND ACCORDINGLY AND   NOTE THAT ANY PARKING SPACES ABOVE MAXIMUM PARKING   SHALL COUNT TOWARDS FAR. THE NUMBER OF SPACES ARE ONLY   ROUNDED UP IF DECIMAL POINT IS EQUAL TO OR ABOVE 0.5.   26. PLEASE INDICATE LOCATION FOR THE GUEST PARKING ON   THE SITE PLANS.   27. PLEASE INDICATE WHAT THE ?SC? LABEL MEANS IN THE   PARKING GARAGE. IF COMPACT SPACES, PLEASE INCLUDE   CALCULATION OF PERCENTAGE OF COMPACT SPACES IN DATA   TABLE MEETING REQUIREMENT OF 94-485 (N)(1). 30% OF   SPACES CAN BE COMPACT FOR PARKING REQUIREMENTS OVER 100   SPACES.   28. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE BIKE SHARE   STATION ON THE SITE PLAN. EFFORTS CAN BE COORDINATED   WITH THE CITY?S CURRENT BIKE SHARE PROGRAM. THE TOTAL   NUMBER OF DOCKS REQUIRED WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE   PROXIMITY OF OTHER BIKE SHARING STATIONS ALREADY   INSTALLED WITHIN 500 FEET FROM THE SUBJECT PROJECT.   29. THE MAXIMUM SF OF MICRO UNITS IS 549 SF. PLEASE BE   SURE TO PLAN FOR THE CONFIGURATION AND LAYOUT OF THE   UNITS AS THIS WOULD IMPACT THE LOCATION OF WINDOWS AND   OTHER FEATURES.   30. PER SECTION 94-106(8A), THE REQUIRED BICYCLE   PARKING FOR THE RESIDENTIAL MICRO-UNITS SHALL BE 0.5   BICYCLE PARKING SPACES PER MICRO-UNIT, WHICH WOULD BE   102 SPACES FOR THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY.   THIS SHALL REQUIRE A COVERED AND ENCLOSED BICYCLE   STORAGE AREA.   31. THE CALCULATION FOR REQUIRED CAR SHARE IS   INCORRECT. THE CALCULATION SHALL BE A RATIO OF ONE CAR   SHARE SPACE PER EVERY 13 UNITS, REDUCED BY ONE CAR   SHARE SPACE PER EVERY 13 ON-SITE MICRO-UNIT PARKING   SPACES PROVIDED. THIS WOULD RESULT IN 8 CAR SHARE   SPACES. PLEASE PROVIDE 2 SPACES ON SITE, AND HAVE THE   REMAINING 6 TO BE SAVED FOR CAR SHARE FOR A FUTURE DATE   BASED ON THE REQUIREMENTS OF 94-106(8A). PLEASE AMEND   TO SHOW THE REQUIRED 2 SPACES PLUS 6 RESERVED SPACES   (WHICH CAN BE USED FOR GUEST PARKING NOW) IN THE   PROJECT DATA TABLE AND SHOW LOCATION OF CAR SHARE   SPACES ON THE SITE PLANS. APPLICANT SHALL COORDINATE   WITH CAR SHARE PROVIDER WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF THE   CITY.   32. STAFF HAS CONCERN WITH THE CRUNCH POINTS OF THE   PARKING GARAGE RAMPS, WHERE THE TWO RAMPS MEET ON THE   SECOND STORY. PLEASE EVALUATE AS THE DRIVE AISLE OF THE   SPEED RAMPS APPEARS TO ALSO BE INCLUDED IN THE DRIVE   AISLE FOR THE SECOND STORY RAMP.   33. PER SECTION 94-111, THE EQUIVALENT OF ONE PARKING   SPACE SHALL BE REQUIRED AT THE TERMINUS OF A DEAD-END   AISLE, AND STRIPED AS A DEDICATED PULL-IN AREA FOR   TURNING AROUND. PLEASE INCLUDE AS NECESSARY IN PARKING   GARAGE.   34. PLEASE COORDINATE TRASH PICKUP AND REMOVAL WITH   PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. HOW WOULD PICKUP WORK FOR THE   PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE ENCLOSURE? PLEASE COORDINATE   WITH MATT HEJAZI. 561-822-2045 [email protected]   35. IS THERE ACCESS TO THE RETAIL FROM THE PARKING   GARAGE? HOW WILL ACCESS WORK? PLEASE LABEL PARKING   SPACES FOR RETAIL ON THE SITE PLAN.   36. PUBLIC BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ONE   SPACE PER 100 FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE. THIS WOULD BE   THE TOTAL OF ALL THREE STREET FRONTAGES FOR A TOTAL OF   6 BICYCLE SPACES (SECTION 93-113)   37. THE REQUIRED WIDTH OF PARKING SPACES IS 8?6? FOR 0   DEGREE ANGLE PARKING. PLEASE ADJUST ACCORDINGLY.   38. ALL SIGNS ARE REVIEWED AT TIME OF BUILDING SIGN   PERMIT. PLEASE MAKE NOTE ON ELEVATIONS THAT SIGNS SHALL   REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMIT AND FOLLOW THE REGULATIONS OF   SECTION 94-110   39. PLEASE PROVIDE SPECIFIC ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL   INCLUDING ALL MATERIALS AND INCLUDE REFERENCE IMAGES.   STAFF HAS CONCERN OVER THE MATERIAL FOR THE GARAGE   SCREENING AND NEEDS TO SEE MORE DETAIL OF THE SPACING   OF THE FEATURES, PROPOSED MATERIAL, ETC.   40. PLEASE CONSIDER ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES OTHER THAN   GARAGE SCREENING ON THE PARKING GARAGE FA?ADE TO BETTER   BLEND THE OBVIOUS FACADE OF PARKING GARAGE SCREENING AS   SEEN FROM THE PUBLIC VIEW, ESPECIALLY FROM OLIVE AVENUE   AND TRINITY PLACE, WHILE KEEPING THE MASSING DIFFERENT   INTACT.   41. PLEASE PROVIDE BUILDING SECTIONS.   42. THE PARKING GARAGE RAMPS SHALL BE COVERED WITH   ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT. BLANK WALLS ARE NOT PERMITTED   PER SECTION 94-109. NON-ACTIVE USES SHALL BE TREATED   WITH ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT PER TABLE IV-4.   43. PLEASE PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE SIDE   INTERIOR SETBACK AND THE SETBACK BEHIND THE SURFACE   PARKING LOT ON TRINITY PLACE TO SCREEN BLANK FACADES.   THIS DOES NOT COUNT TOWARDS ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT OF   NON-ACTIVE USES.   44. PLEASE EXTEND ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT ALONG THE   FA?ADE AREA ADJACENT TO THE PARKING GARAGE ALONG OLIVE   STREET TO ALLEVIATE THE BLANK WALL.   45. PLEASE NOTE, PER RESOLUTION 211-17, PROJECTS WITH   RESIDENTIAL MICRO-UNITS SHALL CONTRIBUTE A TROLLEY FEE   AT $10 PER MICRO-UNIT PER MONTH.   46. HAS THE INCLUSION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS BEEN   CONSIDERED FOR THE BUILDING?   47. PLEASE ELABORATE ON THE PROVIDED AMENITY SPACE.   STAFF SUGGESTS THE CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONAL   AMENITIES FOR THE BUILDING AS THE LIVING AREAS ARE   SMALLER THAN STANDARD UNITS.   48. PLEASE SUBMIT STREET LEVEL RENDERINGS WITH   RESUBMITTAL       FOLLOW UP MEETING RECOMMENDED TO DISCUSS SITE DESIGN.   PLEASE COORDINATE WITH PLANNER           LIZ LEVESQUE, URBAN DESIGN PLANNER   [email protected]   561 822 1426       Print Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved