| 2019-08-15 14:44:42 | CASE NO. PB 950QQQQQ |
| | CITYPLACE CPD - PUBLIX BLOCK SUBAREA REGULATIONS |
| | 375 SOUTH ROSEMARY |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE |
| | (3) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS AND WORD FORMAT OF ALL TEXT. PLEASE NOTE |
| | THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL |
| | OF INFORMATION/PLANS TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT |
| | IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, |
| | AUGUST 30, 2019, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE |
| | OCTOBER 15, 2019 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600). |
| | |
| | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION |
| | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 1) BASED ON THE REBRANDING OF THE RETAIL COMPONENT OF |
| | THE CITYPLACE DISTRICT (THE CPD) AS ROSEMARY SQUARE, IS |
| | IT THE INTENT TO CHANGE THE NOMENCLATURE FOR THE |
| | PARCELS UNDER THE CONTROL OF CITYPLACE RETAIL, LLC, TO |
| | REFLECT THE ROSEMARY SQUARE AS PART OF THIS |
| | APPLICATION? EXAMPLE: ROSEMARY SQUARE REGULATING PLAN |
| | INSTEAD OF CITYPLACE CORE REGULATING PLAN. ROSEMARY |
| | SQUARE CORE SUBAREA, ETC. |
| | |
| | 2) THE FOLLOWING TEXT IS TO BE MOVED FROM THE ROSEMARY |
| | RETAIL CORRIDOR SUBAREA TO THE NEW CITYPLACE (ROSEMARY |
| | SQUARE?) NORTH SUBAREA AS IT SPECIFICALLY PERTAINED TO |
| | THE PUBLIX BLOCK: |
| | |
| | FOR THE BLOCK THAT HAS FRONTAGE ON BOTH ROSEMARY AVENUE |
| | AND SAPODILLA AVENUE, THERE SHALL BE GROUND LEVEL |
| | RESIDENTIAL USES FACING SAPODILLA AVENUE AND THE |
| | EXISTING RESIDENTIAL USES ALONG FERN STREET. |
| | |
| | 3) THE APPLICATION INCLUDES THE ADDITION OF THE USE |
| | "INDUSTRIAL - BAKERY" TO THE ROSEMARY RETAIL CORRIDOR. |
| | THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT PROVIDES NO SUPPORT |
| | INFORMATION FOR THIS REQUEST. |
| | |
| | A. THE CITYPLACE DRI DOES NOT INCLUDE INDUSTRIAL OR |
| | MANUFACTURING AS A USE CATEGORY, SO IT CANNOT BE ADDED |
| | AS A USE CATEGORY IN THE CPD TO HAVE IT BE A PERMITTED |
| | USE. NOTE: THE CITY'S MASTER USE LIST CALCIFIES THIS |
| | USE AS BAKERY PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING. |
| | |
| | B. STAFF DISCUSSED THIS ITEM WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY'S |
| | OFFICE. YOU MUST PROVIDE EXACTLY WHAT THE PROPOSED |
| | BUSINESS PLANS TO DO, INCLUDING: |
| | |
| | I. THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE BAY AND ITS BREAKDOWN. |
| | II. WHAT SPECIFIC PRODUCT(S) ARE BEING MANUFACTURED FOR |
| | OFF-SITE SALES? |
| | III. THE MACHINERY TO BE USED (BOTH TO MANUFACTURE AND |
| | TO PACKAGE) THE PRODUCT. |
| | IV. HOW IS THE PRODUCT BEING PACKAGED? |
| | V. THE HOURS OF THE MANUFACTURING. |
| | VI. THE HOURS FOR THE DELIVERY PICK-UP FOR THE PRODUCT |
| | DISTRIBUTION. |
| | |
| | C. STAFF ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE PROPOSED REGULATIONS |
| | INCLUDE FOUR CRITERIA FOR THE USE; HOWEVER, THESE ARE |
| | NOT SUFFICIENT WITHOUT THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION |
| | REQUIRED FROM COMMENT 3)B. WHAT IS THE MAXIMUM SIZE OF |
| | THE MANUFACTURING PART OF THE BAY? |
| | |
| | 4) SINCE CITYPLACE RETAIL LLC HAS ACQUIRED THE GARAGES |
| | AND THE CHURCH PLAZA FROM THE CRA, THESE AREAS NEED TO |
| | BE INCORPORATED IN THE SUBAREA REGULATIONS AS PART OF |
| | THIS MAJOR AMENDMENT. |
| | |
| | 5) CITYPLACE NORTH SUBAREA |
| | |
| | A. THE CURRENT REGULATIONS PERMIT A FIVE STORY BUILDING |
| | ON THE PUBLIX SITE, INCLUSIVE OF PARKING. STAFF HAS |
| | REVIEWED THE PROPERTIES AND BUILDING ALLOWANCES |
| | SURROUNDING THE PUBLIX SITE AND DOES NOT FIND THAT A |
| | BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10 STORIES IS IN CONTEXT WITH THE |
| | CURRENT AND POTENTIAL FUTURE DEVELOPMENT LIKELY TO |
| | OCCUR TO THE ADJACENT TO THE PUBLIX SITE (NORTH AND |
| | WEST ? QBD-8, WITH TDR ALLOWANCES TO 10 STORIES AND |
| | SOUTH ? FERN STREET TOWNHOUSES, EAST - 360 ROSEMARY |
| | STEPDOWN). |
| | |
| | B. PROVIDE A MASSING DIAGRAM FOR THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT USING THE REGULATIONS AS PROPOSED IN THE |
| | APPLICATION. THE MASSING DIAGRAM MUST USE THE MINIMUM |
| | SETBACKS AND MAXIMUM PROPOSED HEIGHT, AND INCLUDE THE |
| | SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. |
| | |
| | C. STAFF RECOGNIZES THE FAR BASED ON THE FORM BASED |
| | REGULATIONS CURRENTLY IN PLACE FOR THE CITYPLACE |
| | DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DRI) FOR THE PUBLIX |
| | SITE AS 2.75 FAR. |
| | |
| | D. THE TERM GROUP HOME NEEDS TO BE DEFINED. IF THE |
| | PROPOSAL IS FOR A SPECIFIC USER GROUP, EX. ELDERLY, |
| | THIS NEEDS TO BE INCLUDED. IS THIS GOING TO BE |
| | INDEPENDENT LIVING, ASSISTED LIVING, OR A COMBINATION? |
| | |
| | 6) WHILE, STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE PROPOSED |
| | ADDITIONAL HEIGHT 5 TO 15 AND 15 TO 20 OR THE INCREASE |
| | TO THE FAR FROM 2.75 TO 5 AND 5 TO 6, THE INCENTIVES |
| | THAT HAVE BEEN PROPOSED DO NOT JUSTIFY THE REQUESTED |
| | INCREASES. THE PROPOSED INCENTIVES COPIED WHAT WAS |
| | GENERATED FOR THE CITYPLACE CENTER SUBAREA AND THEN |
| | REMOVED CERTAIN PROVISIONS DEALING WITH REQUIRED TREES |
| | AND THEIR INSTALLATION, BICYCLE AND SHOWER FACILITIES, |
| | TROLLEY CONTRIBUTION, AND INCLUDING AN AFFORDABILITY |
| | COMPONENT AS PART OF A GROUP HOME USE. THE ARGUMENT |
| | PRESENTED DURING THE CITYPLACE CENTER WORKFORCE RATIOS |
| | WAS THAT AS THE 1ST BUILDING TO PROVIDE A WORKFORCE |
| | INCENTIVE, THE CITYPLACE CENTER SUBAREA SHOULD HAVE A |
| | LOW WORKFORCE THRESHOLD TO MEET AND THAT SUBSEQUENT |
| | PROJECTS REQUESTING INCENTIVES SHOULD MEET A HIGHER |
| | WORKFORCE THRESHOLD. AS A SUBSEQUENT PROJECT, THE |
| | RESIDENTIAL COMPONENT OF THE CITYPLACE NORTH SUBAREA |
| | NEEDS TO INCLUDE AN INCREASE IN WORKFORCE UNITS SERVING |
| | A LOWER AMI. |
| | |
| | 7) PROVIDE THE RESUBMITTAL IN STRIKE/UNDERLINE FORMAT |
| | FROM THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS APPROVED BY RESOLUTION |
| | NO. 304-18. |
| | |
| | 8) STAFF PROPOSED ROSEMARY SQUARE NORTH SUBAREA |
| | BUILDING ENVELOPE - SENT UNDER SEPARATE COVER. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
