City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Details - Project Z19070004

Plan Review Stops For Project Z19070004

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	09-18-2019			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	09-18-2019	Time	18:26	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	09-18-2019	Time	18:25	Sent To

Notes

2019-09-18 18:25:52

COMMENTS PROVIDED TO APPLICANT VIA SEPARATE DOCUMENT.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	08-21-2019			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	08-21-2019	Time	15:55	Rev Time	12.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	08-21-2019	Time	15:55	Sent To

Notes

2019-08-21 16:08:09	CASE NO. PB 950PPPPP
	REVISED SIGN REGULATIONS

	- CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446

	THE COMMENTS BELOW ARE STAFF'S INITIAL COMMENTS BASED
	ON THE 1ST SUBMITTAL.

	1) THE SIGN PLAN (CRITERIA) AND ALL OTHER LOCATIONS
	NEED TO STATE "DESIGN REGULATIONS" NOT DESIGN
	GUIDELINES.

	SCOPE:

	1) SECTION A.4. REMOVE PALM BEACH COUNTY AND OTHER
	GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY AS ALL LAND WITHIN THE MIXED USE
	PROJECT BOUNDARIES ARE IN PRIVATE OWNERSHIP.

	2) SECTION A.5. ADD "...FROM ANY PUBLIC THOROUGHFARE OR
	ACCESS EASEMENT OR THE UPPER PLAZA AREA IN C BLOCK
	SHALL NOT..." TO COVER THE PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE ROUTE
	WEST OF ROSEMARY AVENUE AND THE UPPER PLAZA BY THE
	MOVIE THEATER, WHICH ARE BOTH OPEN PUBLIC AREAS.

	3) SECTION A.5. MODIFY "...REQUIRES THE APPROVAL OF
	ROSEMARY SQUARE AND A CITY ISSUED BUILDING PERMIT AND
	SHALL..."

	DEFINITIONS:

	1) BLADE SIGN NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED TO CONFORM TO THE
	BLADE SIGN DEFINITIONS ELSEWHERE IN THE TEXT.

	2) CANOPY HAS REPEATED WORDS.

	3) THE DEFINITIONS FOR AWNING AND CANOPY DO NOT INCLUDE
	VERTICAL SUPPORTS. HOW ARE THE ENTRY COVER FOR RUTH
	CHRIS AND THE OUTDOOR SEATING COVER FOR BELLAGIO
	DEFINED? BOTH ARE CANVAS STRUCTURES EXTENDING FROM THE
	BUILDING THAT ARE SUPPORTED BY FRAMES. RUTH CHRIS HAS
	SIGNAGE ON IT, SO THIS IS SOMETHING THAT NEEDS TO BE
	ADDRESSED.

	4) CITYPLACE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT SIGN PACKAGE NEEDS TO
	INCLUDE THE SOUTH TOWER SIGNAGE (NEW EXHIBIT F - STAFF
	WILL PROVIDE).

	5) FASCIA SIGN INCLUDES REFERENCE TO A BUILDING
	IDENTIFICATION SIGN; HOWEVER, THIS SIGN TYPE IS NOT
	LISTED IN ANY OF THE REGULATIONS.

	PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS:

	1) THE UNREGULATED SIGN SECTION IS A.5, NOT B.5

	2) ADD SOUTH TOWER CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION FOR SOUTH
	TOWER APPROVAL. WHO WILL GRANT APPROVAL FOR THE SIGNAGE
	ON THE OFFICE TOWER?

	3) HOW TO TREAT SIGNS THAT BECOME NON-CONFORMING?

	4) ADD THE WAIVER SECTION ONLY APPLIES TO THE SIGNS
	WITHIN ZONE 2 AND COMMERCIAL SIGNS IN ZONE 1.

	5) STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT WAIVER TO INCREASE IN SIZE OF
	THE KIOSK OR WAYFARING SIGNS, SO THESE NEED TO BE
	SPECIFICALLY EXCLUDED FROM WHAT MAY GET WAIVERS.

	6) THE SIGN AREA TRANSFER WAIVERS WERE SPECIFICALLY
	ESTABLISHED TO PERMIT STORES WITH ARCADES TO BE ABLE TO
	SHIFT SF FROM UNDER THE ARCADE TO OUTSIDE THE ARCADE
	(OR VICE VERSA), SINCE THESE WERE BOTH CALCULATED THE
	SAME WAY. IT DOES NOT APPEAR FROM THE REGULATIONS THAT
	A TENANT IS PERMITTED TO HAVE AN ARCADE IDENTITY SIGN
	(OR THE ALTERNATIVE ARCADE FASCIA SIGN) AND AN UNDER
	ARCADE FASCIA SIGN, SO THIS SHIFTING OF WHAT WAS
	ORIGINALLY PROPOSED NO LONGER WOULD APPLY. THE EXISTING
	SF SHIFT PROVISIONS ARE UNWIELDY WITH THE SAME SIGN
	TYPE. STAFF WILL NOT AGREE TO SHIFTING THE SQUARE
	FOOTAGE AMONG DIFFERENT SIGN TYPES.

	WAIVER I

	7) SPECIAL SIGNAGE IS IN SECTION F.

	8) STAFF IS CONCERNED BY THE HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL
	PLACEMENT WAIVER. THE SIGN CRITERIA DESIGNED BY YOUR
	CONSULTANT HAVE BUILT IN A LOT OF LOCATIONAL
	FLEXIBILITY WHILE CREATING THE PLAN THAT CREATES A
	CONSISTENT SIGN BANDING FOR THE TENANTS. THE LOCATIONAL
	WAIVERS WERE ORIGINALLY ADDED TO THE MASTER SIGN PLAN
	SINCE THE ORIGINAL SIGN ZONES WERE VERY SPECIFIC AND
	DID RESULT IN SOME BUSINESSES HAVING SIGN LOCATIONS
	THAT WOULD NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE VISIBILITY.

	WAIVER II

	9) THE NEW SIGNAGE PROVISION NEEDS TO BE FOR NEW SIGNS
	PERMITTED ELSEWHERE IN THE DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN.

	GENERAL SIGN ZONE:

	1) ADD AS GENERAL NOTES FOR ALL SIGNS:

	2) NO SIGN SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO
	OBSTRUCT OR PREVENT NORMAL VEHICULAR OPERATION OR
	TRAFFIC VISIBILITY WITHIN A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY.

	3) NO SIGN SHALL BE INSTALLED THAT WOULD OBSTRUCT A
	REQUIRED SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLE, TRAFFIC SIGNALS, OR ANY
	REQUIRED TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAGE.

	4) ADD TO SIGN ZONES 1, 3, 4 5 AND 6:

	CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIALS. ALL INSTALLATION COMPONENTS
	OR HANGING DEVICES SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
	FASTENERS, CLIPS, BOLTS, ETC., SHALL BE OF
	NON-CORROSIVE, STAINLESS STEEL, ALUMINUM, BRASS OR
	BRONZE; CARBON BEARING STEEL SHALL BE OF NONFERROUS
	METAL OF QUALITY MATERIAL AND FINISH. ALL FASTENERS
	SHALL BE CONCEALED. ALL SIGNAGE SHALL HAVE AN
	INDIVIDUAL CIRCUIT AND BE CONTROLLED BY A TIME CLOCK.
	EXPOSED CONDUIT OR ELECTRICAL WIRING IS PROHIBITED.
	EXPOSED RACEWAYS, TRANSFORMERS, BALLASTS, AND
	ELECTRICAL WIRING ARE PROHIBITED. CHANNEL OR CUT-LETTER
	SIGNAGE IS RECOMMENDED.

	PROHIBITED SIGNS. AUDIBLE, FLASHING, PAPER SIGNS, AND
	INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED BOX-SIGNS ARE PROHIBITED. SIGNS
	WITH VISIBLE BACKS ARE PROHIBITED. MONUMENTS SIGNS ARE
	PROHIBITED EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY PROVIDED IN THIS
	SECTION.

	5) NOTE: THE INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED BOX SIGN IN 3 AND 6
	SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH THE MONUMENT SIGN STATEMENT,
	SINCE THEY ALLOW THEM.

	6) THE SECTION 18-232 REFERENCE NEEDS TO BE FROM THE
	CITY CODE, NOT THE ZLDR. NOTE: THIS REPEATS IN VARIOUS
	ZONES AS WELL AS A SIGN TYPE.

	ZONE 1:

	1) RESIDENTIAL TOWER LANGUAGE NEEDS TO BE REWORDED TO
	PROVIDE CLARITY (THIS WAS MISSED IN THE CURRENT TEXT).

	2) WHY DOES THE COMMERCIAL TENANT SIGNAGE SECTION ONLY
	REFERENCE THE SIGN CRITERIA SECTION 4.1 INSTEAD OF THE
	ENTIRE PACKAGE? SECTION 4.1 DOES NOT INCLUDE THE
	MATERIALS, TYPE SETS, LIGHTING, ETC.

	3) REMOVE THE ADDRESS REFERENCE. THEY ARE ALREADY
	REQUIRED BY THE CITY CODE SECTION 78-6 OF ALL
	BUILDINGS.

	4) ADD THE REAR SERVICE DOOR ADDRESS NOTE FOR
	COMMERCIAL BAYS THAT IS FOUND IN ZONE 2.

	ZONE 2:

	1) ADD "NO SIGNS ADVERTISING A BUSINESS ABOVE THE 1ST
	LEVEL OF THE HARRIET HIMMEL THEATER" IN ORDER TO
	MAINTAIN ITS HISTORIC CHARACTER.

	2) REMOVE THE FRONT ADDRESS REFERENCE. THEY ARE ALREADY
	REQUIRED BY THE CITY CODE SECTION 78-6 OF ALL
	BUILDINGS.

	3) D-BLOCK OFFICE (UPPER STORIES) SIGNS SHOULD BE CLEAR
	THAT THEY NEED TO MEET ALL THE SIGN CRITERIA (EX. 3.1
	AND 3.2).

	4) STAFF IS CONCERNED THE REMOVING THE NUMBER AND TOTAL
	SF LIMITS ON THE UPPER OFFICE SIGNAGE COULD LEAD TO A
	PROLIFERATION OF SIGNS ON THE FACADE AND CANNOT SUPPORT
	THE REMOVAL OF THE LIMITATION.

	ZONE 3:

	5) THE FOLLOWING TEXT NEEDS TO BE ADDED TO THE ZONE 3
	DESCRIPTION.

	THE CITYPLACE OFFICE TOWER IS PERMITTED TO HAVE THE
	FOLLOWING:

	THREE (3) TENANT IDENTIFICATION SIGNS (21? X 7?)
	LOCATED ON ANY THREE (3) OF THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS
	BETWEEN THE 15TH AND 16TH FLOORS
	TWO (2) SMALL TENANT IDENTIFICATION SIGNS (9? X 2?) ON
	THE SOUTH BUILDING ELEVATION
	ONE (1) MEDIUM TENANT IDENTIFICATION SIGN (13? X 5?) AT
	THE TOP OF THE 5TH FLOOR ON THE EAST BUILDING ELEVATION
	ONE (1) SMALL TENANT ENTRY SIGN (72? X 16?) ON THE
	NORTH BUILDING ELEVATION OVER THE EASTERN ENTRY DOOR
	ONE ATM IDENTIFICATION SIGN (6? X 1?) AS PART OF THE
	ATM ON THE EAST BUILDING ELEVATION
	ONE (1) MONUMENT SIGN (10? X 8?).

	SIGN ZONE 4:

	1) TYPO IN BLADE SIGN AREA NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED (WAS
	COPIED FROM DMP TYPO).

	SIGN ZONE 5:

	1) STAFF WILL PROVIDE CORRECTION BASED ON THE PREVIOUS
	APPROVALS, INCLUDING A GRAPHIC.

	SIGN ZONE 6:

	1) TYPO IN BLADE SIGN AREA NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED (WAS
	COPIED FROM DMP TYPO).

	SIGN TYPES:

	TYPE 1:

	1) CLARIFICATION IS REQUIRED - RETAILERS UNDER THE
	ARCADE ARE ONLY PERMITTED AN ARCADE IDENTITY SIGN OR A
	FASCIA SIGN ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE ARCADE AND NO FASCIA
	SIGN IS PERMITTED ON THE FASCIA UNDER THE ARCADE. ONLY
	WINDOW GRAPHICS OR A BLADE SIGN IS PERMITTED UNDER THE
	ARCADE.

	2) HAVING FIVE DIFFERENT OF ARCADE IDENTITY SIGNS SEEMS
	THAT IT COULD RESULT IN A DISCORDANT LOOK TO THE
	SIGNAGE. NOTE: THE ARCADE IDENTITY SIGNS WHICH
	CURRENTLY EXIST ABOVE THE PLAZA AREA DO NOT MEET THE
	TYPES PROPOSED AND ADD TO THE DISCORDANCE.

	3) CLARIFICATION IS REQUIRED - IF LETTERING IS PUT ON
	AN AWNING VALANCE, THEN IS NO ARCADE IDENTITY OR FASCIA
	SIGN PERMITTED?

	4) TYPO AT THE END OF THE CANOPY SIGN DESCRIPTION.

	5) THE CURRENT MASTER SIGN PLAN INCLUDES AWNING
	REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE ADDRESS WHY THE FOLLOWING HAVE
	BEEN REMOVED (STAFF IS LOOKING FOR CLARIFICATION SO THE
	INTENT AND REGULATIONS ARE CLEAR):

	A. NO AWNINGS ARE PERMITTED IN THE ARCADES LOCATED
	WITHIN THE CITYPLACE PROJECT OR THE PERFORMANCE HALL.
	NOTE: STAFF WILL NOT SUPPORT AWNINGS FOR THE
	NON-COMMERCIAL PORTION OF THE HARRIET HIMMEL THEATER.

	B. ALL AWNINGS SHALL BE SYMPATHETIC TO THE BUILDING'S
	ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGNED AS AN INTEGRAL COMPONENT OF
	THE STORE'S OR BUILDING'S OVERALL SIGNAGE
	IDENTIFICATION PACKAGE

	C. AWNINGS SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF EIGHT (8) FEET OF
	CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION TO THE
	LOWEST POINT OF THE AWNING. ALL AWNINGS ON THE STREET
	LEVEL SHALL PROJECT FOUR (4) FEET FROM THE BUILDING
	FACADE, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY CITYPLACE RETAIL
	IN WRITING. ALL AWNINGS ON THE SECOND FLOOR SHALL
	PROJECT THREE (3) FEET FROM THE BUILDING FACADE, UNLESS
	OTHERWISE APPROVED BY CITYPLACE RETAIL IN WRITING.
	NOTE: THIS WAS IN PLACE TO ESTABLISH A UNIFORM VISUAL
	LOOK. IS THE INTENT TO PERMIT ANY STYLE AWNING? IF NOT
	THEN THE SPECIFIC AWNINGS ALONG OKEECHOBEE MAY NEED TO
	BE INCLUDED AS AN ATTACHMENT.

	D. EXCEPT FOR THE FLAT, HORIZONTAL AWNINGS ALLOWED ON
	OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD BUILDING FACES, ALL AWNINGS ON
	STREET LEVEL SHALL HAVE AN EIGHT (8) INCH VERTICAL
	VALANCE ALONG THE FRONT OF THE AWNING. THE VALANCE
	SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH CONCEALED WEIGHT TO PREVENT
	EXCESSIVE MOVEMENT IN HIGH WINDS.

	6) CLARIFICATION IS REQUIRED - WHERE IS THE 5 FOOT
	MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF AWNING MEASURED?

	TYPE 2:

	1) CLARIFICATION IS REQUIRED - THE WALL BLADE SIGNS
	WILL ONLY HAVE 2 SF PER FACE?

	2) CLARIFICATION IS REQUIRED - WHAT IS MEANT BY UPPER
	LEVEL INLINE TENANT AND WHERE DO THE REGULATIONS
	PROPOSE THEIR BLADE SIGNS TO BE PERMITTED (THIS IS NOT
	SHOWN ON THE 4.1 STOREFRONT DRAWINGS.

	3) THE STOREFRONT TYPE 4 DRAWING CONFLICTS WITH THE
	BLADE SIGN LOCATION FROM SECTION 3.3.

	4) THE IMAGES PROVIDED WITH SECTION 3.3 FOR THE CEILING
	BLADE SIGNS SEEM TO SHOW THE PROPORTION OF THE SIGN
	WIDTH AS A THIRD OF THE CEILING WIDTH AND MOUNTED IN
	THE CENTRAL THIRD. STAFF THINKS THAT THIS IS A GOOD
	RATIO AND LOCATION AND SO THIS NEEDS TO BE INCLUDED AS
	REGULATIONS.

	5) SOME OF THE BLADE SIGN EXAMPLES SHOW EXPOSED BOLTS
	AND MOUNTING BRACKETS. THE CURRENT REGULATIONS
	SPECIFICALLY PROHIBIT THIS AND THE NEW CONSTRUCTION
	REQUIREMENTS STATE "...EQUIPMENT NECESSARY FOR SIGN
	CONNECTION SHALL BE CONCEALED." AND "...RIVETS, SCREWS
	AND OTHER FASTENERS THAT EXTEND TO VISIBLE SURFACES
	SHALL BE FLUSH, FILLED, AND FINISHED SO AS TO BE
	UNNOTICEABLE." DO NOT INCLUDE EXAMPLES THAT DO NOT
	CONFORM TO THE REGULATIONS.

	TYPE 3:

	1) INCLUDE THAT THE WINDOW GRAPHICS DO NOT UNREASONABLY
	OBSTRUCT VIEW INTO STORE.

	TYPE 4:

	1) THIS TYPE OF SIGN IS CALLED A VERTICAL BUILDING SIGN
	IN THE CITY, SO THE NOMENCLATURE NEEDS TO CHANGE IN THE
	MATERIAL.

	2) THERE IS A CONFLICT WITH THE ALLOWED LOCATION OF
	THIS SIGN. IT IS NOT LISTED AS PERMITTED WITHIN THE
	SIGN ZONE 2. ADDITIONALLY, IF THIS IS TO BE PERMITTED
	AS A WAIVER I, THE WAIVER I SECTION NEEDS TO INCLUDE
	THAT IT IS A WAIVER I.

	3) STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT TWO VERTICAL BUILDING SIGNS
	FOR A TENANT ON THE SAME FA?ADE, REGARDLESS IF THEY
	HAVE A TWO STORY UNIT. IF A TENANT, EITHER ONE STORY OR
	TWO STORY HAS TWO FRONTAGES, THEN A SIGN ON EACH
	FRONTAGE IS ACCEPTABLE.

	4) THE USE OF A VERTICAL BUILDING SIGN REPLACES THE USE
	OF A PRIMARY IDENTITY SIGN.

	TEMPORARY SIGNAGE:

	1) THIS IS LISTED AS SIGN TYPE 6, YET IS THE 5TH SIGN
	TYPE.

	2) THE DESCRIPTION OF TEMPORARY SIGNS IN EXHIBIT C IS
	NOT ACCEPTABLE TO STAFF. OBJECTIVE SIZE CRITERIA NEED
	TO BE INCLUDED. ADDITIONALLY, STAFF WILL NOT SUPPORT
	THE OBSTRUCTION OF THE WINDOWS.

	3) ONE OF THE PHOTOS SHOWS GROUND SIGNS POINTING TO AN
	OPEN DOOR. STAFF WILL NOT PERMIT THAT AS SIGNAGE.

	SPECIAL SIGNS:

	SIGNS ON STRUCTURES

	1) STAFF NEEDS CLARIFICATION ON EXACTLY WHAT THESE ARE
	AND WHERE THEY ARE ENVISIONED. THE EXAMPLE PHOTO DOES
	NOT SEEM TO SHOW THESE LOCATED AT THE BUSINESS THAT
	THEY SERVE.

	2) THIS SIGN TYPE NEEDS TO HAVE OBJECTIVE STANDARDS
	INCLUDED WITH THEM - SIZE, HEIGHT, ETC.

	3) AS WRITTEN, THIS SEEMS TO BE AN ALLOWANCE FOR
	MONUMENT SIGNS THROUGHOUT THE DISTRICT.

	PAINTED WALL SIGNS

	1) THE ALLOWED AREAS LISTS "...SOLID AREAS OF A FACADE,
	SUCH AS WOOD OR BRICK PANELS." IS STUCCO ALSO
	CONSIDERED AN ALLOWED LOCATION AS A SOLID AREA? IF SO
	IT SHOULD BE LISTED SO THERE IS NO CONFUSION IN
	APPLYING THE REGULATIONS.

	FLOOR ENTRY SIGNS

	1) THE SIGN TYPE DESCRIPTION MENTIONS RECESSED SIGNS
	WHILE THE REQUIREMENTS PROHIBITS RECESSED SIGNS. THIS
	NEEDS TO BE CONSISTENT.

	2) THE MAXIMUM DIMENSION AND SQUARE FOOTAGE NEEDS TO BE
	INCLUDED.

	3) WORDING PROHIBITING THE SIGNS IN THE ROW IS
	REQUIRED.

	4) ADDRESS STORES WITH MULTIPLE ENTRANCES, SUCH AS H&M
	OR BRIO, AND PATIOS.

	DIGITAL KIOSK

	1) STAFF NEEDS MORE CLARITY ON HOW THESE WILL FUNCTION.
	THE CRITERIA STATE THAT THE DIGITAL SCREENS WILL NOT
	DIRECTLY FACE A VEHICULAR TRAVEL LANE. DOES THIS MEAN
	THAT THE KIOSK WILL BE PERPENDICULAR OR PARALLEL TO THE
	RIGHT-OF-WAY?

	2) WHERE AND HOW MANY KIOSKS ARE PROPOSED?

	3) STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT 20 SQUARE FEET FOR THE
	DIGITAL SCREEN FACE. SIX SQUARE FEET (EX: 2 FOOT BY 3
	FOOT SCREEN) PROVIDES SUFFICIENT AREA FOR A DIGITAL
	SCREEN TO PROVIDE INFORMATION TO THE CUSTOMER.

	4) THE DIMENSIONS OF THE KIOSK NEED TO BE INCLUDED IN
	THE KIOSK CRITERIA. THIS WILL DEPEND ON THE SCREEN
	WIDTH; HOWEVER, EVEN WITH A 2 FOOT WIDE SCREEN, THE
	KIOSK SHOULD BE NO WIDER THAN APPROXIMATELY 2.5 FEET
	AND NO TALLER THAN 7 FEET AND NO DEEPER THAN 12 INCHES.

	5) THE TOTAL COPY AREA ON THE FACE OF THE KIOSK NEEDS
	TO BE DEFINED. SOME STATIC COPY FOR ROSEMARY SQUARE,
	NOT ADVERTISING A SPECIFIC RETAILER, CAN BE OUTSIDE OF
	THE DIGITAL AREA; HOWEVER, THE ENTIRE FACE OF THE KIOSK
	MAY NOT BE COPY.

	6 WHEN THE KIOSK SCREENS ARE NOT IN USE, THEY MAY
	DISPLAY LIFESTYLE IMAGES, THE ROSEMARY SQUARE
	LOGO/NAME, AND UPCOMING EVENTS OF PUBLIC INTEREST SUCH
	AS SPECIAL OR SEASONAL EVENTS. ADVERTISEMENTS FOR
	SPECIFIC RETAILERS OR PRODUCTS NOT PERMITTED.

	WAYFINDING

	1) THE ENTIRE WAYFINDING PACKET NEEDS FURTHER
	DISCUSSION. THERE ARE SIGNS SHOWN THAT ARE NOT WITHIN
	THE CITYPLACE CPD BOUNDARY, THERE ARE SIGNS SHOWN
	WITHIN THE FDOT RIGHT-OF-WAY, THERE ARE SIGNS SHOWN
	WITHIN THE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY, THERE ARE SIGNS SHOWN
	WITHIN LANDSCAPE AREAS, AND THERE ARE SIGNS FOR
	STREETSCAPE DESIGNS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY
	STAFF. THERE ARE GENERAL COMMENTS PROVIDED BELOW.

	2) THE PROPOSED FREESTANDING PEDESTRIAN DIRECTIONAL,
	URBAN PEDESTRIAN DIRECTORY AND VALET PARKING ID SIGNS
	ARE TOO TALL. IN FACT THE URBAN PEDESTRIAN DIRECTORY
	SIGN HAS TEXT AT 9 FEET HIGH, WHICH IS IMPRACTICAL TO
	READ FOR AN AVERAGE HEIGHT PERSON.

	3) STAFF WILL NOT SUPPORT THE DIGITAL SCREEN ON THE
	URBAN PEDESTRIAN DIRECTORY.

	4) HOW WILL THE DIRECTIONAL SIGNS BE ILLUMINATED AT
	NIGHT?

	THE VALET SIGNS MUST BE DESIGNED TO MATCH THE OTHER
	WAYFINDING SIGNS.

	5) THE DETAILED SIGN LOCATION PLANS CONTAIN ERRORS.

	EX: PAGE 29 SHOWS 2 TYPE A3, ONE IN A LANDSCAPE AREA.
	THE ELECTRIC PLAN THAT WAS SUBMITTED WITH THE VALET
	DROP OFF AREA SHOWED A DIGITAL KIOSK IN ALMOST THE SAME
	SPOT AS A TYPE 3 SIGN. STAFF WILL ONLY SUPPORT ONE SIGN
	AT THIS LOCATION. THE RIDE SHARE PICK-UP IS NOT
	PERMITTED IN THE ALLEY (A7) AND MUST OCCUR IN THE DROP
	OFF AREA AS PER THE APPROVED PLANS.

	EXHIBIT C

	1) SIGN TYPES SHOULD HAVE EXAMPLES CURRENTLY EXISTING
	WITHIN ROSEMARY SQUARE TO DEMONSTRATE WHAT IS DESIRED.
	EX. SIGN TYPE 1D DOES NOT SHOW AN ARCADE.

	2) THE EXAMPLE GRAPHICS NEED TO HAVE A LABEL TO
	DESCRIBE WHAT THEY ARE SHOWING THAT IS LISTED IN THE
	ADJACENT TEXT.

	3) THERE ARE A NUMBER OF PROPERTIES WITHIN ROSEMARY
	SQUARE THAT DO NOT HAVE AN ARCADE. DO THESE STORES THEN
	AUTOMATICALLY GET A FASCIA IDENTITY SIGN (TYPE 1A)?

	GENERAL:

	1) WHAT IS A NEON CROSS OVER?