Plan Review Details - Project Z19050026
Plan Review Stops For Project Z19050026
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 06-11-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 06-11-2019 Time 21:51 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 06-11-2019 Time 21:51 Sent To  
Notes
2019-06-11 22:18:12DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. AN ASBESTOS
 SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED AND AN ASBESTOS ABATEMENT
 REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT PALM BEACH
 COUNTY OFFICE. CONTACT ALEX ORTEGA AT (561) 837-5963,
 OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 3. UNITY OF TITLE. FOR ANY BUILDING CROSSING A PROPERTY
 LINE, EITHER A RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE, OR SOME OTHER
 APPROVED LEGAL INSTRUMENT, SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE
 PERMIT APPLICATION, OR THE BUILDING MUST HAVE A FIRE
 WALL ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, PER SECTION 202 OF
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, FIRE SEPARATION
 DISTANCE.
  
 4. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT, THE
 PLANS SHALL SHOW AT LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE,
 COMPLYING WITH SECTIONS 206.2 AND 402.2 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE, FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ALL
 ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR FACILITY ENTRANCES.
  
 5. ANY PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WITH A SLOPE GREATER
 THAN 1:20 SHALL BE CONSIDERED A RAMP AND SHALL COMPLY
 WITH SECTION 405 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE.
  
 6. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 7. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS,
 FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS,
 GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE,
 SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 8. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
 AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
 CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
 THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.
  
 9. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. IF THE COST OF NEW VERTICAL
 CONSTRUCTION EXCEEDS $750,000 THIS PROJECT WILL BE
 SUBJECT TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR
 ADVICE ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF
 THE AIPP ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN
 PUBLIC PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 4 Status N Date 12-31-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 12-31-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 12-31-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 3 Status P Date 10-11-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 10-11-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 10-11-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-11 10:49:41PASSED WITH PROVISO:
  
 THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH IS SEEKING ABANDONMENT OF
 THE EXISTING 10 IN. EAST - WEST WATER MAIN WITHIN
 LIMITS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY. DEVELOPER SHALL WORK IN
 CONJUNCTION WITH CITY TO THAT END AS A CONDITION OF
 APPROVAL.
  
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS.
  
 RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX
 3366, ZIP 33402)
 MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098
 FAX: (561) 494-1116 MOBILE: (561) 246-9525
 EMAIL: [email protected] WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING
  
 MANNY GONZALEZ, SENIOR ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX
 3366, ZIP 33402)
 MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 DIRECT: (561) 494-1085
 FAX: (561) 494-1116 MOBILE: (561) 644-7301
 EMAIL: [email protected] WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 08-21-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 08-21-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 08-21-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-08-21 09:38:58ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL MEET WITH CITY ENGINEERING TO
 DISCUSS WATER/SEWER DESIGN OPTIONS.
  
 PLEASE CONTACT:
  
 MANNY GONZALEZ
 SENIOR ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
 (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402)
 MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200
 DIRECT: (561) 494-1085
 FAX: (561) 494-1116
 MOBILE: (561) 644-7301
 EMAIL: [email protected]
 WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-07-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 06-07-2019 Time   Rev Time 2.00
Received By rrossano Date 06-07-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-06-07 08:37:38THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF REGULATIONS
 AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY AFFECT THE
 DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND WASTEWATER
 UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE DEVELOPMENT
 PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK BELOW:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WPB_W
 EBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FULL-P
 ACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97B19
 60045731D3658206F27451722716EF
 THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE
 FOUND HERE:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
 MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA,
 CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08, ADOPTED SEPT. 22,
 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)
 CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL,
 SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER
 SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY.
  
 THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
 BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
 BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
  
 PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM AND PEAK)
 AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PER FAC
 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER.
  
 PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER ALONG
 ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE.
  
 PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY OF
 WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT
 OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF YOUR
 PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
 MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
 IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
 [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER
 ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION
 ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD
 SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.
  
 AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
 MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI
 CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL
  
 PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF
 ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES,
 INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND
 SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES,
 METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE
 SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING
 GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS,
 ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL
 INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER
 LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN
 VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS.
 ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER
 OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &
 TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL
 UTILITY CROSSINGS.
  
 SHOW VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION INFORMATION
 (NAVD 88 AND NGVD 29).
  
 CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY
 ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
 RIGHT OF WAY.
  
 PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE
 DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB
 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION).
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND
 IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED
 AREAS.
  
 PROVIDE UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY
 PERSONNEL TO PROPOSED UTILITIES INCLUDING WATER METERS.
  
 PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
 PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
  
 PROVIDE ENLARGED DETAIL ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION
 OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION.
  
 SHOW ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENTS.
  
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS.
  
 RICK ROSSANO
 PROJECT COORDINATOR
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
 (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402)
 MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200
 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098
 FAX: (561) 494-1116
 MOBILE: (561) 246-9525
 EMAIL: [email protected]
 WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING
  
 MANNY GONZALEZ
 SENIOR ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
 (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402)
 MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200
 DIRECT: (561) 494-1085
 FAX: (561) 494-1116
 MOBILE: (561) 644-7301
 EMAIL: [email protected]
 WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING
  
 CENTRAL OPERATIONS CENTER (DISPATCH):
 24-HOUR EMERGENCY RESPONSE SERVICES TO PUBLIC
 UTILITIES, PUBLIC WORKS, PARKS, ETC. 561-822-2210
  
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 4 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 3 Status P Date 10-04-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 10-04-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 10-04-2019 Time 12:39 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 08-14-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 08-14-2019 Time 09:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 08-14-2019 Time 09:06 Sent To  
Notes
2019-08-14 09:08:072ND REVIEW RESPONSE
  
 AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC INFORMATION PACKET AND
 RESPONSE LETTER DATED JULY 22, 2019, FROM URBAN DESIGN
 KILDAY STUDIOS, TO JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPLE
 PLANNER, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION
 BUREAU COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.
  
 THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES
 NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
 THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 06-04-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 06-04-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 06-04-2019 Time 15:09 Sent To  
Notes
2019-06-04 15:16:30THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 ANY PROPOSED TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FENCING HAS 20'
 ACCESS WIDTH FOR FD USE IN CASE OF EMERGENCY. IT IS
 RECOMMENDED THAT ANY GATE HAVE KNOX PADLOCKS FOR FD
 USE.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE
 OCCUPANCY TYPE, PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 AND WHETHER IT THERE IS MIXED OR SEPARATED OCCUPANCY.
  
 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE
 LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER
 SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED.
  
 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC'S PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE
 BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND
 FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED WITH 100' OF EACH OTHER AND ON
 THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET(IF POSSIBLE) OR ACCESS
 ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER ARRIVING
 EMERGENCY VEHICLES.
  
 9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER
 THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY
 ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM,
 ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FS 61G AND
 SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PLAN.
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
 EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
 PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
 SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 THERE APPEARS TO BE LARGE MERCANTILE SPACES WITH
 LIMITED EXITS. PLEASE ENSURE THE CODE REQUIREMENTS OF
 THE OCCUPANCY AND EGRESS CODES ARE MET.
  
 IT APPEARS THERE IS A COMMON EGRESS CORRIDOR AT THE
 REAR OF THESE OCCUPANCY THAT LEAD TO AN EXTERIOR
 LOADING DOCK. THERE APPEARS TO BE ONLY ONE EXIT STAIR
 THAT DOES NOT MEET THE EGRESS WIDTH REQUIREMENT OF THE
 TOTAL OCCUPANTS THAT MAY USE THIS CORRIDOR.PLEASE
 ENSURE THE CODE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OCCUPANCY AND
 EGRESS CODES ARE MET.
  
 11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE
 SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY
 DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 01-08-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 01-08-2020 Time 11:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 01-08-2020 Time 11:39 Sent To  
Notes
2020-01-08 11:40:03FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: SHOPS AT THE PRESS Z19050026
 OCTOBER 11, 2019
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE
 DISPOSITION PLAN:
 ? SATISFIED. IDENTIFY SPECIES OF ALL TREES AND PALMS ON
 THE TREE DISPOSITION LIST.
 ? SATISFIED. TREES AND PALMS CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE TO
 BE MITIGATED BASED ON CATEGORY. ANY TREES 20 FEET OR
 MORE CANOPY DIAMETER TO BE MITIGATED BY ACTUAL SQUARE
 FOOTAGE.
 ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF
 MITIGATION FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE
 REMOVED.
 ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE REPLACEMENT MITIGATION VALUES
 BY CATEGORY FOR THE PROPOSED TREES AND PALMS.
 THE CHART NECESSARY IS TO SHOW THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE
 REQUIRED FOR MITIGATION BY ADDING ALL THE REMOVALS
 TOGETHER. THE NEW TREES ADDED IN THE PLANT LIST ARE TO
 BE GIVEN VALUES BY CATEGORY, THEN SUBTOTAL FOR EACH
 SPECIES, THEN ADD THE TOTAL PROVIDED. STAFF
 CALCULATIONS ARE 8971 SQ FT MITIGATION DUE, 4950
 PROVIDED NEW, AND TOTAL DIFFERENCE IS 4021 SQ FT TO
 CALCULATE PAYMENT INTO TREE MITIGATION FUND. THIS COULD
 BE REDUCED BY RELOCATING THE 2 LARGE LIVE OAK TREES.
 RECALCULATE ALL MITIGATION DUE BASED ON COMMENT 2
 BELOW, AND IF PAYMENT IN LIEU IS REQUIRED, CALCULATE
 THE AMOUNT DUE BY USING THE AVERAGE PRICE BY SPECIES
 FOR A 12 FOOT GRADE ONE REPLACEMENT TREE AND MULTIPLY
 BY TWO FOR INSTALLATION, PER SECTION 94-448(E)(2).
  
 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. ONCE ALL THE TREES AND PALMS ARE CORRECTLY
 IDENTIFIED, THE NUMBER OF TREES AND PALMS REQUIRED TO
 BE RELOCATED CAN BE DETERMINED.
 THE APPLICANT WILL PROVIDE WRITTEN VERIFICATION FROM A
 TREE RELOCATION CONTRACTOR IF THE LIVE OAK TREES #530,
 #529 AND #535 AND SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA #538 LISTED IN GOOD
 CONDITION CANNOT BE RELOCATED FOR ANY REASON. ANY
 INFORMATION PROVIDED MUST BE IN REFERENCE TO ANSI A300
 (PART 5)-2005 STANDARDS ANNEX A.
  
  
  
 3. SATISFIED. THE SITE DATA SHOWS THE LANDSCAPE AREA
 FOR THE SITE WITH THE PROPOSED CHANGES BEING REDUCED TO
 11.5%. THIS IS BELOW THE REQUIRED 15% AND MUST BE
 CORRECTED TO MEET THE CODE REQUIREMENTS TO BE APPROVED
 AS A MINOR AMENDMENT.
 4. SATISFIED. PROPOSED LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS
 AND SUPPLY LINES ALONG S DIXIE MAY NOT BE POSSIBLE TO
 INSTALL WITHOUT DISTURBING EXISTING PALM TREES. ALSO,
 LOCATIONS WILL LIMIT FUTURE OPTIONS FOR REQUIRED TREE
 INSTALLATION. REVISE TO KEEP ALL EQUIPMENT OUTSIDE THE
 REQUIRED 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER. THIS AREA OF THE
 BUFFER IS NON-CONFORMING AND SHOULD BE BROUGHT INTO
 COMPLIANCE PROVIDING THE REQUIRED BUFFER TREES TO
 PRODUCE SHADE FOR THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK.
 5. SATISFIED. HYDRANT AND OTHER VALVES ARE PROPOSED IN
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS. REQUIRED
 TREES MUST BE INSTALLED IN TERMINAL ISLANDS, SO
 UTILITIES CANNOT BE LOCATED IN POSITIONS THAT WOULD
 DISPLACE REQUIRED TREES.
 6. SATISFIED. THE LANDSCAPE AREAS IN THE PROPOSED
 PARKING ARE DO NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF CODE
 SECTION 94-443(C)(3) A. FOR THE REQUIRED SHADE OR
 FLOWERING TREE.
 7. SATISFIED. THERE ARE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS SHOWN ON
 SHEET LA-3 AND LA-7 THAT ARE NOT SHOWING REPLACEMENT OF
 MISSING TREES. REVISE TO INCLUDE REPLACEMENTS.
 8. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A
 MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO
 BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING
 AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. ROYAL PALMS DO
 NOT MEET THE INTENT OF PROVIDING SHADE FOR PARKING
 SPACES.
  
 9. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS
 REQUIRED TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES.
  
 10. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING
 AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND
 LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH
 SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4).
  
 11. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL REQUIRED CURBS ADJACENT TO
 LANDSCAPE AREAS. THE AREA AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
 THE PARKING DECK IS NOT DEFINED.
  
 12. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE AMOUNT OF LINEAR FEET OF
 BUILDING PERIMETER LANDSCAPE PROPOSED TO MEET THE
 REQUIREMENT OF 30% FOR COMMERCIAL USE FOR THE SOUTH
 BUILDING.
  
 13. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
 PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
 MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
 PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF DROUGHT TOLERANT AND
 NATIVE SPECIES ADDED BASED ON THE PROPOSED PLANT LIST.
 CHANGE ?REQUIRED? TO ?ADDED?.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. UPDATED TREE
 DISPOSITION PLAN WITH CALCULATIONS FOR PAYMENT IN LIEU
 IS TO BE SUBMITTED FOR TREE ALTERATION PERMIT
 APPLICATION TP19-1778, AND PAYMENT SUBMITTED FOR THE
 AMOUNT DUE WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS
 PETITION.
  
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 10-11-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 10-11-2019 Time 16:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 10-11-2019 Time 16:17 Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-11 16:17:57FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: SHOPS AT THE PRESS Z19050026
 OCTOBER 11, 2019
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE
 DISPOSITION PLAN:
 ? SATISFIED. IDENTIFY SPECIES OF ALL TREES AND PALMS ON
 THE TREE DISPOSITION LIST.
 ? SATISFIED. TREES AND PALMS CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE TO
 BE MITIGATED BASED ON CATEGORY. ANY TREES 20 FEET OR
 MORE CANOPY DIAMETER TO BE MITIGATED BY ACTUAL SQUARE
 FOOTAGE.
 ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF
 MITIGATION FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE
 REMOVED.
 ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE REPLACEMENT
 MITIGATION VALUES BY CATEGORY FOR THE PROPOSED TREES
 AND PALMS.
 THE CHART NECESSARY IS TO SHOW THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE
 REQUIRED FOR MITIGATION BY ADDING ALL THE REMOVALS
 TOGETHER. THE NEW TREES ADDED IN THE PLANT LIST ARE TO
 BE GIVEN VALUES BY CATEGORY, THEN SUBTOTAL FOR EACH
 SPECIES, THEN ADD THE TOTAL PROVIDED. STAFF
 CALCULATIONS ARE 8971 SQ FT MITIGATION DUE, 4950
 PROVIDED NEW, AND TOTAL DIFFERENCE IS 4021 SQ FT TO
 CALCULATE PAYMENT INTO TREE MITIGATION FUND. THIS COULD
 BE REDUCED BY RELOCATING THE 2 LARGE LIVE OAK TREES.
 RECALCULATE ALL MITIGATION DUE BASED ON COMMENT 2
 BELOW, AND IF PAYMENT IN LIEU IS REQUIRED, CALCULATE
 THE AMOUNT DUE BY USING THE AVERAGE PRICE BY SPECIES
 FOR A 12 FOOT GRADE ONE REPLACEMENT TREE AND MULTIPLY
 BY TWO FOR INSTALLATION, PER SECTION 94-448(E)(2).
  
 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES
 NATIVE TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE
 OR RELOCATED. ONCE ALL THE TREES AND PALMS ARE
 CORRECTLY IDENTIFIED, THE NUMBER OF TREES AND PALMS
 REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED CAN BE DETERMINED.
 THE APPLICANT WILL PROVIDE WRITTEN VERIFICATION FROM A
 TREE RELOCATION CONTRACTOR IF THE LIVE OAK TREES #530,
 #529 AND #535 AND SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA #538 LISTED IN GOOD
 CONDITION CANNOT BE RELOCATED FOR ANY REASON. ANY
 INFORMATION PROVIDED MUST BE IN REFERENCE TO ANSI A300
 (PART 5)-2005 STANDARDS ANNEX A.
  
  
  
 3. SATISFIED. THE SITE DATA SHOWS THE LANDSCAPE AREA
 FOR THE SITE WITH THE PROPOSED CHANGES BEING REDUCED TO
 11.5%. THIS IS BELOW THE REQUIRED 15% AND MUST BE
 CORRECTED TO MEET THE CODE REQUIREMENTS TO BE APPROVED
 AS A MINOR AMENDMENT.
 4. SATISFIED. PROPOSED LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS
 AND SUPPLY LINES ALONG S DIXIE MAY NOT BE POSSIBLE TO
 INSTALL WITHOUT DISTURBING EXISTING PALM TREES. ALSO,
 LOCATIONS WILL LIMIT FUTURE OPTIONS FOR REQUIRED TREE
 INSTALLATION. REVISE TO KEEP ALL EQUIPMENT OUTSIDE THE
 REQUIRED 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER. THIS AREA OF THE
 BUFFER IS NON-CONFORMING AND SHOULD BE BROUGHT INTO
 COMPLIANCE PROVIDING THE REQUIRED BUFFER TREES TO
 PRODUCE SHADE FOR THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK.
 5. SATISFIED. HYDRANT AND OTHER VALVES ARE PROPOSED IN
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS. REQUIRED
 TREES MUST BE INSTALLED IN TERMINAL ISLANDS, SO
 UTILITIES CANNOT BE LOCATED IN POSITIONS THAT WOULD
 DISPLACE REQUIRED TREES.
 6. SATISFIED. THE LANDSCAPE AREAS IN THE PROPOSED
 PARKING ARE DO NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF CODE
 SECTION 94-443(C)(3) A. FOR THE REQUIRED SHADE OR
 FLOWERING TREE.
 7. SATISFIED. THERE ARE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS SHOWN ON
 SHEET LA-3 AND LA-7 THAT ARE NOT SHOWING REPLACEMENT OF
 MISSING TREES. REVISE TO INCLUDE REPLACEMENTS.
 8. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A
 MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO
 BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING
 AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. ROYAL PALMS DO
 NOT MEET THE INTENT OF PROVIDING SHADE FOR PARKING
 SPACES.
  
 9. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS
 REQUIRED TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES.
  
 10. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING
 AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND
 LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH
 SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4).
  
 11. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL REQUIRED CURBS ADJACENT TO
 LANDSCAPE AREAS. THE AREA AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
 THE PARKING DECK IS NOT DEFINED.
  
 12. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE AMOUNT OF LINEAR FEET OF
 BUILDING PERIMETER LANDSCAPE PROPOSED TO MEET THE
 REQUIREMENT OF 30% FOR COMMERCIAL USE FOR THE SOUTH
 BUILDING.
  
 13. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L.
 PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT
 MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
 PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF DROUGHT TOLERANT AND
 NATIVE SPECIES ADDED BASED ON THE PROPOSED PLANT LIST.
 CHANGE ?REQUIRED? TO ?ADDED?.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 08-15-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 08-15-2019 Time 17:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 08-15-2019 Time 17:27 Sent To  
Notes
2019-08-15 17:28:20FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: SHOPS AT THE PRESS Z19050026
 AUGUST 15, 2019
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE
 DISPOSITION PLAN:
 ? SATISFIED. IDENTIFY SPECIES OF ALL TREES AND PALMS ON
 THE TREE DISPOSITION LIST.
 ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. TREES AND PALMS CANOPY SQUARE
 FOOTAGE TO BE MITIGATED BASED ON CATEGORY. ANY TREES 20
 FEET OR MORE CANOPY DIAMETER TO BE MITIGATED BY ACTUAL
 SQUARE FOOTAGE.
 ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE
 OF MITIGATION FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE
 REMOVED.
 ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE REPLACEMENT
 MITIGATION VALUES BY CATEGORY FOR THE PROPOSED TREES
 AND PALMS.
 THE CHART NECESSARY IS TO SHOW THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE
 REQUIRED FOR MITIGATION BY ADDING ALL THE REMOVALS
 TOGETHER. THE NEW TREES ADDED IN THE PLANT LIST ARE TO
 BE GIVEN VALUES BY CATEGORY, THEN SUBTOTAL FOR EACH
 SPECIES, THEN ADD THE TOTAL PROVIDED. STAFF
 CALCULATIONS ARE 8971 SQ FT MITIGATION DUE, 4950
 PROVIDED NEW, AND TOTAL DIFFERENCE IS 4021 SQ FT TO
 CALCULATE PAYMENT INTO TREE MITIGATION FUND. THIS COULD
 BE REDUCED BY RELOCATING THE 2 LARGE LIVE OAK TREES.
  
 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. ONCE ALL THE TREES AND PALMS ARE CORRECTLY
 IDENTIFIED, THE NUMBER OF TREES AND PALMS REQUIRED TO
 BE RELOCATED CAN BE DETERMINED.
 3. SATISFIED. THE SITE DATA SHOWS THE LANDSCAPE AREA
 FOR THE SITE WITH THE PROPOSED CHANGES BEING REDUCED TO
 11.5%. THIS IS BELOW THE REQUIRED 15% AND MUST BE
 CORRECTED TO MEET THE CODE REQUIREMENTS TO BE APPROVED
 AS A MINOR AMENDMENT.
 4. SATISFIED. PROPOSED LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS
 AND SUPPLY LINES ALONG S DIXIE MAY NOT BE POSSIBLE TO
 INSTALL WITHOUT DISTURBING EXISTING PALM TREES. ALSO,
 LOCATIONS WILL LIMIT FUTURE OPTIONS FOR REQUIRED TREE
 INSTALLATION. REVISE TO KEEP ALL EQUIPMENT OUTSIDE THE
 REQUIRED 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER. THIS AREA OF THE
 BUFFER IS NON-CONFORMING AND SHOULD BE BROUGHT INTO
 COMPLIANCE PROVIDING THE REQUIRED BUFFER TREES TO
 PRODUCE SHADE FOR THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK.
 5. SATISFIED. HYDRANT AND OTHER VALVES ARE PROPOSED IN
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS. REQUIRED
 TREES MUST BE INSTALLED IN TERMINAL ISLANDS, SO
 UTILITIES CANNOT BE LOCATED IN POSITIONS THAT WOULD
 DISPLACE REQUIRED TREES.
 6. SATISFIED. THE LANDSCAPE AREAS IN THE PROPOSED
 PARKING ARE DO NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF CODE
 SECTION 94-443(C)(3) A. FOR THE REQUIRED SHADE OR
 FLOWERING TREE.
 7. SATISFIED. THERE ARE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS SHOWN ON
 SHEET LA-3 AND LA-7 THAT ARE NOT SHOWING REPLACEMENT OF
 MISSING TREES. REVISE TO INCLUDE REPLACEMENTS.
 8. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A
 MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO
 BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING
 AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. ROYAL PALMS DO
 NOT MEET THE INTENT OF PROVIDING SHADE FOR PARKING
 SPACES.
  
 9. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS
 REQUIRED TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES.
  
 10. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING
 AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND
 LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH
 SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4).
  
 11. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL REQUIRED CURBS ADJACENT TO
 LANDSCAPE AREAS. THE AREA AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
 THE PARKING DECK IS NOT DEFINED.
  
 12. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE AMOUNT OF LINEAR FEET OF
 BUILDING PERIMETER LANDSCAPE PROPOSED TO MEET THE
 REQUIREMENT OF 30% FOR COMMERCIAL USE FOR THE SOUTH
 BUILDING.
  
 13. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF
 PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT
 TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE
 LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH
 FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH
 FLORIDA LANDSCAPES.
 PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF DROUGHT TOLERANT AND
 NATIVE SPECIES ADDED BASED ON THE PROPOSED PLANT LIST.
 CHANGE ?REQUIRED? TO ?ADDED?.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-11-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 06-11-2019 Time 15:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 06-11-2019 Time 15:56 Sent To  
Notes
2019-06-11 15:56:44FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: SHOPS AT THE PRESS Z19050026
 JUNE 11, 2019
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE
 DISPOSITION PLAN:
 ? IDENTIFY SPECIES OF ALL TREES AND PALMS ON THE TREE
 DISPOSITION LIST.
 ? TREES AND PALMS CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE TO BE MITIGATED
 BASED ON CATEGORY. ANY TREES 20 FEET OR MORE CANOPY
 DIAMETER TO BE MITIGATED BY ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE.
 ? PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF MITIGATION FOR
 ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.
 ? PROVIDE THE REPLACEMENT MITIGATION VALUES BY CATEGORY
 FOR THE PROPOSED TREES AND PALMS.
  
 2. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES IN GOOD
 CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. ONCE
 ALL THE TREES AND PALMS ARE CORRECTLY IDENTIFIED, THE
 NUMBER OF TREES AND PALMS REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED CAN
 BE DETERMINED.
 3. THE SITE DATA SHOWS THE LANDSCAPE AREA FOR THE SITE
 WITH THE PROPOSED CHANGES BEING REDUCED TO 11.5%. THIS
 IS BELOW THE REQUIRED 15% AND MUST BE CORRECTED TO MEET
 THE CODE REQUIREMENTS TO BE APPROVED AS A MINOR
 AMENDMENT.
 4. PROPOSED LOCATIONS OF FPL TRANSFORMERS AND SUPPLY
 LINES ALONG S DIXIE MAY NOT BE POSSIBLE TO INSTALL
 WITHOUT DISTURBING EXISTING PALM TREES. ALSO, LOCATIONS
 WILL LIMIT FUTURE OPTIONS FOR REQUIRED TREE
 INSTALLATION. REVISE TO KEEP ALL EQUIPMENT OUTSIDE THE
 REQUIRED 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER. THIS AREA OF THE
 BUFFER IS NON-CONFORMING AND SHOULD BE BROUGHT INTO
 COMPLIANCE PROVIDING THE REQUIRED BUFFER TREES TO
 PRODUCE SHADE FOR THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK.
 5. HYDRANT AND OTHER VALVES ARE PROPOSED IN LANDSCAPE
 ISLANDS ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS. REQUIRED TREES MUST
 BE INSTALLED IN TERMINAL ISLANDS, SO UTILITIES CANNOT
 BE LOCATED IN POSITIONS THAT WOULD DISPLACE REQUIRED
 TREES.
 6. THE LANDSCAPE AREAS IN THE PROPOSED PARKING ARE DO
 NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF CODE SECTION 94-443(C)(3)
 A. FOR THE REQUIRED SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE.
 7. THERE ARE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS SHOWN ON SHEET LA-3 AND
 LA-7 THAT ARE NOT SHOWING REPLACEMENT OF MISSING TREES.
 REVISE TO INCLUDE REPLACEMENTS.
 8. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES THAT A MINIMUM OF 75
 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED
 WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF STREET PARKING AREA SHALL
 BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES. ROYAL PALMS DO NOT MEET THE
 INTENT OF PROVIDING SHADE FOR PARKING SPACES.
  
 9. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS REQUIRED TO
 PROTECT UTILITY LINES.
  
 10. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE PARKING AREA SURFACE
 CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS AND LANDSCAPE AREAS
 PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 94-443
 (C)(3) AND (4).
  
 11. SHOW ALL REQUIRED CURBS ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPE
 AREAS. THE AREA AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE PARKING
 DECK IS NOT DEFINED.
  
 12. PROVIDE THE AMOUNT OF LINEAR FEET OF BUILDING
 PERIMETER LANDSCAPE PROPOSED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENT OF
 30% FOR COMMERCIAL USE FOR THE SOUTH BUILDING.
  
 13. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT
 SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL
 ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT
 SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF
 SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA
 WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA
 LANDSCAPES.
 PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF DROUGHT TOLERANT AND
 NATIVE SPECIES ADDED BASED ON THE PROPOSED PLANT LIST.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 3 Status P Date 12-30-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 12-30-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 12-30-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-12-30 10:54:14NO FURTHER COMMENTS FROM DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 2 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 10-07-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 10-07-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-07 16:10:22LOCATION OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE AS SHOWN ON SP-1 IS
 TOO CLOSE TO THE LOADING ZONE, WHICH COULD CAUSE ISSUES
 AND INTRUPTION TO THE SERVICE DUE TO BLOCKED ACCESS.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 06-11-2019 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 06-11-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-06-14 14:55:26PLEASE PROVIDE A PLAN SHOWING AUTO-TURN FOR SANITATION
 SERVICE ALONG WITH THE DUMPTER ENCLOSURE SPEC.
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-09 09:05:57THE FOLLOWING COMMENT IS FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 10/4/2019 REVIEW SET OF PLANS:
  
 1. INDICATE HOW STORM WATER QUALITY TREATMENT IS BEING
 PROVIDED FOR THE AREA OF NEW CONSTRUCTION. IF EXISTING
 EXFILTRATION TRENCH IS BEING USED THEN A PROFESSIONAL
 ENGINEER WILL NEED TO CERTIFY THE SYSTEM IS FUNCTIONING
 PROPERLY.
  
 2. SPECIAL PURPOSE SURVEY NOT INCLUDED IN THE SUBMITTAL
 SO STAFF CANNOT DETERMINE IF PREVIOUS COMMENTS HAVE
 BEEN ADDRESSED.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-10-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 06-10-2019 Time 18:51 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 06-10-2019 Time 18:52 Sent To  
Notes
2019-06-10 18:54:22THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES.
 THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS
 CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
 MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. PARKING STRUCTURE COLUMNS APPEAR TO BE BLOCKING USE
 OF PROPOSED GROUND LEVEL PARKING SPACES. SOME OF THE
 COLUMNS FOR THE DIAGONAL EDGE APPEAR TO BE IN THE DRIVE
 AISLES.
  
 2. WATER QUALITY TREATMENT AND PEAK FLOW ATTENUATION
 MEETING SFWMD CRITERIA TO BE PROVIDED FOR THE AREA
 IMPACTED BY CONSTRUCTION.
  
 3. S. DIXIE HIGHWAY MAINTAINED BY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
 TRANSPORTATION.
  
 4. ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY STATES PROPERTY IS
 LOCATED IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA. THIS IS
 INCONSISTENT WITH BEING IN AN ?X-UNSHADED? AREA OF THE
 FEMA FIRM.
  
 5. VERIFY INVERT ELEVATION DIRECTIONS FOR THE DRAINAGE
 STRUCTURES SHOWN ON THE SKETCH OF SPECIFIC PURPOSE
 SURVEY.
  
 6. THE CITY?S VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD 1929. THE CITY HAS
 ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD 1988 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION
 EQUATION TO NGVD 1929 IS PROVIDED ON THE SHEET(S). LIST
 THE CONVERSION EQUATION ON THE SKETCH OF SPECIFIC
 PURPOSE SURVEY.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
 THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS
 CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE
 ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED
 WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP PRIOR TO STARTING
 CONSTRUCTION.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-10-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 06-10-2019 Time 13:37 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-06-10 13:51:081. AS PREVIOUSLY DISCUSSED, PROPERTY WILL NEED TO BE
 REPLATTED.
 2. NEED TO SEE DETAIL OF FOOTINGS/IMPROVEMENTS IN
 RELATION TO EXISTING WATER MAIN AND EASEMENT.
 3. OPTION TO EXTEND WATERMAIN ALONG WESTERLY PROPERTY
 LINE SOUTH TO MONCEAUX IS BEING EXPLORED.
 4. VALVE WILL NEED TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO BRIDGE
 DEMOLITION OVER WATER MAIN.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status P Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 01-15-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-01-15 10:25:52PASSED WITH CONDITION:
 1. DELIVERY TRUCKS SHALL BE LIMITED TO WB-40 SIZE AND
 SHALL ACCESS THE LOADING AREA TO THE SOUTH OF THE
 RENOVATED RETAIL/OFFICE BUILDING FROM DIXIE HIGHWAY,
 TRAVELING WEST ON MONCEAUX ROAD AND CIRCULATING THROUGH
 THE WEST PARKING LOT, TO ACCESS THE LOADING AREA. NO
 ACCESS FROM GEORGIA AVENUE TO THE WEST, VIA MONCEAUX
 AVENUE WILL BE PERMITTED.
  
  
  
 SHING TSOI
 CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
 561-494-1141
 [email protected]
 (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS)
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 08-19-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-08-19 16:21:50SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
 1. NO TRUCKS SHOULD USE GEORGIA AVENUE FOR DELIVERY.
 ALL DELIVERY TRUCKS SHOULD ACCESS THE SITE THROUGH
 DIXIE HIGHWAY AND THE PROPERTY PARKING LOT.
 2. PROVIDE AUTOTURN PATHS FOR ALL DELIVERY AND GARBAGE
 TRUCKS ACCESS AND IN ALL LOADING ZONES, AS APPLICABLE.
 TRUCKS IN THE LOADING ZONE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
 THE SITE APPEAR TO BLOCK THE INTERNAL DRIVE AISLE.
 ALSO, THE CITY CODE DOES NOT ALLOW FREIGHT VEHICLES TO
 BACKUP INTO THE STREET OR TAKE THE SIDE STREETS AS THE
 MAIN ROUTE. ALL TRUCK MANEUVERING SHOULD BE ON-SITE.
 3. SHOW PEDESTRIAN PATH BETWEEN DIXIE HIGHWAY AND THE
 WESTERN HALF OF BUILDING 3.
 4. ILLUSTRATE THE ACCESSIBLE PATH FROM THE TWO
 HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES WEST OF BUILDING 1 TO THE
 BUILDING ENTRANCE.
 TRAFFIC STUDY COMMENTS:
 5. CLARIFY THE CALCULATION OF THE 10% REDEVELOPMENT
 CREDIT. IN THE LATEST SUBMITTAL, ONLY 29,022 SF OF
 WAREHOUSE IS REDEVELOPED INTO A GROCERY STORE, BUT THE
 REDEVELOPMENT CREDIT ASSUMED FOR PHASE 1 IS THE SAME AS
 THE FULL REDEVELOPMENT. 86,650 SF OF OFFICE IS
 DEMOLISHED AND CONVERTED TO PARKING. THE REMAINING
 OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE USES WOULD REMAIN IN THE EXISTING
 BUILDINGS.
 6. THE TRAFFIC STUDY SHOWS THE FULL REDEVELOPMENT WHICH
 GENERATE 1,976 NET NEW DAILY TRIPS AND 158 NET NEW PM
 TRIPS. IF THE DEVELOPER DOES NOT PROPOSE TO IMPLEMENT
 THE OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS TO MITIGATE TRAFFIC IMPACT OF
 THE FULL REDEVELOPMENT IN THIS MINOR AMENDMENT, PLEASE
 SUBMIT A SEPARATE TRAFFIC STATEMENT OR LETTER SIGNED BY
 A PE DOCUMENTING TRIP GENERATION FOR ONLY PHASE 1 OF
 THE DEVELOPMENT. THE FULL TRAFFIC STUDY WILL BE
 REVIEWED IN DETAIL WHEN MAJOR AMENDMENT APPLICATION IS
 SUBMITTED, AND WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE CITY'S TRAFFIC
 STUDY REQUIREMENTS AT THE TIME OF SUBMISSION.
  
 LINA M. CAMACHO
 SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER
 561-494-1129
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 06-11-2019 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-06-11 18:07:231. PROVIDE THE COUNTY TPS LETTER
 2. THE CITY CODE DOES NOT ALLOW A FREIGHT VEHICLES TO
 BACKUP INTO THE STREET OR TAKE THE SIDE STREETS AS THE
 MAIN ROUTE. PROVIDE FREIGHT VEHICLE CIRCULATION AND A
 MANAGE PLAN TO PREVENT THE INTRUSION INTO THE SIDE
 STREETS.
 3. PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AT THE RAILROAD TRACKS
 FROM THE EXISTING WEST PARKING LOT INTO THE PROPOSED
 BUILDING 3.
 4. PROVIDE A BUS SHELTER.
 5. PROVIDE MEDIAN OR QUAD GATES FOR SAFETY AT MONCEAUX
 RD AND THE RAILROAD TRACK CROSSING.
 6. MILL AND RESURFACE MONCEAUX RD FROM S. DIXIE HWY TO
 FLORIDA AVE.
 7. MONCEAUX RD IS PART OF THE CITY?S BICYCLE
 MASTERPLAN. PROVIDE BIKE LANES AT BOTH SIDES OF
 MONCEAUX RD FROM S. DIXIE HWY TO FLORIDA AVE.
  
  
 LINA M. CAMACHO
 SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER
 561-494-1129
 [email protected]
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 01-13-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 01-13-2020 Time 14:19 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 01-13-2020 Time 14:19 Sent To  
Notes
2020-01-13 14:20:14PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 01.13.2020
 PROJECT NO.: Z19050026
 CASE NO.: PB 1086B
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. [ SATISFIED ] - UTILITY LETTERS SHALL BE PROVIDED
 INDICATING NO OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS.
  
 1.1. [ SATISFIED ] - LETTERS FROM FPL AND AT&T SHALL BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 2. [ SATISFIED ] - THE SITE PLAN IS UNCLEAR AS TO WHAT
 IMPROVEMENTS ARE EXISTING AND WHICH ONES ARE PROPOSED.
 AS SUCH, IT IS DIFFICULT TO DETERMINE WHAT IS
 NONCONFORMING AND MAY NEED TO BE BROUGHT INTO
 COMPLIANCE, ETC.
  
 2.1. [ SATISFIED ] - THERE APPEARS TO BE A NUMBER OF
 IMPROVEMENTS TO THE WEST OF, AND UNDERNEATH, THE
 EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING THAT ARE NOT SHOWN AS BEING
 INCLUDED IN THE ?AFFECTED AREA?. THE IMPROVEMENTS
 INCLUDE THE ADDITION OF BICYCLE PARKING, A DUMPSTER
 ENCLOSURE, TERMINATION OF THE PARKING DRIVE AISLE
 UNDERNEATH THE BUILDING DUE TO THE RAMP FOR THE PARKING
 DECK, ETC. PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE ARE NEW COMMENTS
 PROVIDED THAT RELATE TO ADDITIONAL CONCERNS WITH THESE
 ITEMS.
  
 3. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - AS A FOLLOW UP TO PREVIOUS
 DISCUSSIONS, WHAT IS THE LATEST REGARDING THE DESIGN OF
 THE FUTURE GROCER AND THE ACTIVATION OF THE SOUTH DIXIE
 HIGHWAY CORRIDOR?
  
 3.1. [ SATISFIED ] - A SMALL OUTDOOR SEATING AREA WAS
 ADDED TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS, BUT THIS IS NOT SHOWN
 ON THE SITE OR LANDSCAPE PLANS. ADDITIONALLY, IT IS
 UNCLEAR HOW THIS SEATING AREA CAN BE ACCESSED.
  
 4. [ SATISFIED ] - THE SITE PLAN IS UNCLEAR AS TO THE
 LOCATION OF THE RAMP THAT PROVIDES ACCESS TO THE TOP OF
 THE PARKING DECK. IT SEEMS THAT THE RAMP MAY IMPEDE
 WITH MULTIPLE DRIVE AISLES AND OVERALL SITE
 CIRCULATION, IMPACTING EXISTING PARKING.
  
 5. [ SATISFIED ] - THE PROPOSED PARKING DECK APPEARS TO
 CONFLICT WITH MULTIPLE UTILITY LINES, ESPECIALLY A
 WATER MAIN LOCATED WITHIN A 10-FOOT EASEMENT AND A SIX
 (6) FOOT UNDERGROUND UTILITY EASEMENT.
  
 5.1. [ SATISFIED ] - A PORTION OF THE PARKING DECK
 (NORTHEAST CORNER) STILL EXTENDS INTO THE SIX (6) FOOT
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY EASEMENT.
  
 5.1.1. [ CONDITION OF APPROVAL ] ? EASEMENT WILL NEED
 TO BE ABANDONED PRIOR TO PERMITTING.
  
 5.2. [ CONDITION OF APPROVAL ] - THE SITE PLAN SHOWS A
 PROPOSED 10-FOOT WATER EASEMENT, BUT WHAT IS PROPOSED
 TO HAPPEN WITH THE EXISTING EASEMENT THAT IS SHOWN
 UNDER THE PROPOSED PARKING DECK? THE ENGINEERING PLANS
 INDICATE THAT THIS IS GOING TO BE ABANDONED. IF SO, THE
 UTILITY WORK, AND MODIFICATIONS TO THE EASEMENT WILL BE
 REQUIRED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY PERMITS FOR THE
 PARKING DECK.
  
 5.3. [ NEW COMMENT ] - A NUMBER OF IMPROVEMENTS ARE
 SHOWN IN THE 12-FOOT FPL EASEMENT IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF
 THE WAREHOUSE BUILDING.
  
 5.3.1. [ CONDITION OF APPROVAL ] ? EASEMENT WILL NEED
 TO BE ABANDONED PRIOR TO PERMITTING.
  
 5.4. [ SATISFIED ] - A NUMBER OF IMPROVEMENTS ARE SHOWN
 IN THE FPL EASEMENT WEST OF THE EXISTING OFFICE
 BUILDING.
  
 6. [ SATISFIED ] - THE PARKING DECK SHOULD BE ADDED
 INTO THE SITE DATA TABLE FOR ALL APPLICABLE
 CALCULATIONS (LOT COVERAGE, IMPERVIOUS, BUILDING
 SETBACKS, BUILDING HEIGHT, ETC.). IT IS REQUIRED TO
 COMPLY WITH THE SAME REGULATIONS AS OTHER BUILDINGS IN
 THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) ZONING DISTRICT.
  
 7. [ SATISFIED ] - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-145(7), THE
 MINIMUM BUILDING SEPARATION SHALL BE ZERO FEET, OR NOT
 LESS THAN TEN (10) FEET. ACCORDING TO THE SITE PLAN,
 THE PARKING DECK IS ONLY 4.5 FEET FROM THE EXISTING
 OFFICE BUILDING.
  
 8. [ SATISFIED ] - BY DEFINITION, THE FRONT OF THE
 PROPERTY IS ALONG BELVEDERE ROAD AND MONCEAUX ROAD;
 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY IS CONSIDERED A CORNER-SIDE.
  
 9. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED - SEE CONDITION OF APPROVAL
 BELOW ] - IN DISCUSSION AMONGST STAFF, IT WAS SUGGESTED
 THAT SINCE A LINER BUILDING IS NOT BEING PROPOSED ALONG
 SOUTH DIXIE (IN FRONT OF THE PARKING DECK, ETC.) THAT
 SOME ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS OR DECORATIVE FEATURES
 (SUCH AS A TRELLIS, ETC.) COULD BE INCORPORATED INTO,
 OR IN PLACE OF, THE EASTERN MOST ROW OF PARKING.
  
 9.1. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - WHAT WAS THE OBJECTION TO THE
 INSTALLATION OF A TRELLIS, ETC.?
  
 9.1.1. [ NEW COMMENT ] ? RESPONSE INDICATED THAT THIS
 WAS GOING TO BE FURTHER EXPLORED AS PART OF THE MAJOR
 AMENDMENT, BUT NOTHING HAS BEEN PROVIDED WITHIN THAT
 APPLICATION.
  
 9.2. [ CONDITION OF APPROVAL ] - THE PROVISION OF BUS
 SHELTER AND THE DESIGN OF SUCH SHALL BE INCLUDED AS
 PART OF THE FUTURE MAJOR AMENDMENT.
  
 10. [ SATISFIED ] - THERE SEEMS TO BE A LARGE NUMBER OF
 SMALL CAR SPACES CONCENTRATED IN SOME OF THE AREA WHERE
 PARKING DEMAND WILL BE HEAVIEST. PURSUANT TO SEC.
 94-485(N)(1)E., SMALL CAR SPACES ARE TO BE DISTRIBUTED.
  
 11. [ SATISFIED ] - YOU WILL NEED TO CONFIRM WITH THE
 BUILDING DIVISION, BUT ACCESSIBLE PARKING MAY NEED TO
 BE PROVIDED UNDER THE COVER OF THE PARKING DECK.
  
 12. [ SATISFIED - SEE CONDITION OF APPROVAL BELOW ] -
 THE SQUARE FOOTAGES IN THE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND PBC
 TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION DO NOT SEEM TO
 CORRESPOND WITH THE SQUARE FOOTAGES THAT ARE SHOWN ON
 THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS, STUDIES,
 ETC. ARE CONSISTENT.
  
 12.1. [ CONDITION OF APPROVAL ] - A CONDITION OF
 APPROVAL WILL EXIST REGARDING THE MAXIMUM SQUARE
 FOOTAGE THAT CAN BE OCCUPIED, AND THAT THE TRAFFIC
 ANALYSIS AND CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION BE UPDATED AS
 PART OF FUTURE DEVELOPMENT.
  
 13. [ SATISFIED - SEE CONDITION OF APPROVAL BELOW ] -
 THE TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION LETTER FROM PALM
 BEACH COUNTY INDICATES THAT THE PROJECT IS TO ?MEET
 CRITERIA AS OUTLINED IN THE CITY?S TDM (TRANSPORTATION
 DEMAND MANAGEMENT) ORDINANCE.? PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS
 AS THERE IS NO TDM ORDINANCE THAT HAS BEEN ADOPTED FOR
 THIS AREA.
  
 13.1. [ CONDITION OF APPROVAL ] - A CONDITION OF
 APPROVAL WILL EXIST REGARDING THE MAXIMUM SQUARE
 FOOTAGE THAT CAN BE OCCUPIED.
  
 14. [ SATISFIED ] - THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
 REFERENCES THAT THE PROJECT WILL BE PARTICIPATING IN
 THE CITY?S MOBILITY FUNDS PROGRAM; PLEASE NOTE THAT NO
 SUCH PROGRAM HAS BEEN ADOPTED, AND UNDER THE ?PROPOSED?
 PROGRAM, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS OUTSIDE THE BOUNDARIES
 OF SUCH PROGRAM.
  
 14.1. [ SATISFIED ] - THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
 SHOULD HAVEN BEEN REVISED TO REMOVE REFERENCE TO THE
 MOBILITY FUND AND TDM PROGRAM.
  
 15. [ SATISFIED ] - PURSUANT TO THE PBC TRAFFIC
 CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION LETTER, AN FDOT CONCEPTUAL
 DRIVEWAY PRE-APPROVAL LETTER SHALL BE OBTAINED. SPECIAL
 ATTENTION SHOULD BE PROVIDED REGARDING THE COUNTY?S
 SUGGESTION OF A CENTER LEFT TURN LANE.
  
 15.1. [ SATISFIED ] - THE LETTER FROM FDOT INDICATES
 THAT ALL OF THE DRIVEWAYS ARE RIGHT IN/RIGHT OUT, BUT
 THE STRIPING AND DESIGN SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT
 INDICATE SUCH.
  
 16. [ SATISFIED ] - SIDEWALKS/CROSSINGS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED FROM THE PEDESTRIAN EXIT POINTS OF THE PARKING
 DECK TO BUILDINGS #1 AND #3.
  
 16.1. [ SATISFIED ] - THERE?S CONCERN REGARDING THE
 DESIGN OF THE CROSSWALK, STOP SIGN, ETC. THAT IS
 PROPOSED IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE PARKING DECK.
 THE STOP SIGN APPEARS TO BE FLOATING IN THE DRIVE
 AISLE, PEDESTRIANS ARE DIRECTED TO WALK IN FRONT OF
 VEHICLES BEFORE CROSSING THE DRIVEWAY, ETC. THE
 ISLAND/LANDING AT THE BASE OF THE STAIRS SHOULD BE
 EXTENDED TO THE EDGE OF THE DRIVE AISLE, ALLOWING FOR
 PLACEMENT OF THE STOP SIGN, AND THE CROSS WALK CAN GO
 FROM THE SOUTH EDGE OF THE LANDING.
  
 17. [ SATISFIED - SEE CONDITION OF APPROVAL BELOW ] -
 SIGNAGE SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THE ARCHITECTURAL
 DRAWINGS AND SHOULD BE REVIEWED AS A SEPARATE SIGN
 PACKAGE.
  
 17.1. [ CONDITION OF APPROVAL ] - ALL SIGNAGE WILL BE
 REVIEWED AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING AND SHALL COMPLY
 WITH THE ZLDRS.
  
 18. [ SATISFIED - SEE CONDITION OF APPROVAL BELOW ] -
 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED FOR
 REVIEW OF THE FREESTANDING SIGNS:
  
 18.1. [ SATISFIED - SEE CONDITION OF APPROVAL BELOW ] -
 SETBACK SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM ALL FREESTANDING SIGNS
 TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE, AND SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF SEC. 94-408(D)(2) AND (3).
  
 18.2. [ SATISFIED - SEE CONDITION OF APPROVAL BELOW ] -
 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF FREESTANDING SIGN AREA SHALL BE
 PROVIDED AND SHALL COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE
 PROVISIONS OF SEC. 94-408(D)(2) AND (3).
  
 18.3. [ CONDITION OF APPROVAL ] - ALL SIGNAGE WILL BE
 REVIEWED AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING AND SHALL COMPLY
 WITH THE ZLDRS.
  
 19. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - SCREENING SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR
 THE TRASH COMPACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 94-315(A).
  
 19.1. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - STAFF DOES NOT UNDERSTAND THE
 RESPONSE THAT WAS PROVIDED. PLEASE CLARIFY HOW THE
 TRASH COMPACTOR IS PROPOSED TO COMPLY WITH THE CITED
 PROVISION OF THE CITY?S ZLDRS.
  
 19.1.1. [ NEW COMMENT ] ? THE SITE HAS A LABEL FOR A
 TRASH COMPACTOR, BUT NOTHING IS SHOWN ON THE SITE
 PLAN?NO ENCLOSURE, NO LANDSCAPE SCREENING, ETC. AS
 SHOWN ON THE PLAN IT LOOKS LIKE THE TRASH COMPACTOR
 WOULD JUST BE SITTING IN THE MIDDLE OF THE LOADING
 AREA.
  
 20. [ SATISFIED ] - IT IS STAFF'S POSITION THAT
 LANDSCAPING SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE OUTER PERIMETER
 OF THE PARKING DECK (SPECIFICALLY THE EAST AND SOUTH
 SIDES) TO SOFTEN THE APPEARANCE OF THE STRUCTURE AND
 MAKE IT BLEND IN WITH THE REMAINDER OF THE SITE.
  
 21. [ SATISFIED ] - MULTIPLE STRUCTURAL COLUMNS FOR THE
 PARKING DECK ENCROACH INTO DRIVE AISLES, PARKING
 SPACES, ETC. ON THE GROUND LEVEL.
  
 21.1. [ SATISFIED ] - PLEASE CONFIRM THAT NO COLUMNS
 ARE PROPOSED ON THE INTERIOR (GROUND LEVEL) OF THE
 PARKING DECK. IF COLUMNS ARE PROPOSED, THEY SHALL BE
 SHOWN ON THE PLAN TO INDICATE THAT THEY DO NOT CONFLICT
 WITH PARKING SPACES OR DRIVE AISLES AND/OR THAT THE
 STRIPING IS ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY TO ACCOMMODATE THEM.
  
 22. [ SATISFIED ] - THE PARKING STALL DETAIL ON SHEET
 12 OF THE ENGINEERING PLANS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY?S
 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS.
  
 23. [ SATISFIED ] - THE BICYCLE PARKING DETAIL
 REFERENCES THE SITE PLAN FOR DIMENSIONS, ETC., BUT NO
 DIMENSIONS WERE PROVIDED.
  
 24. [ SATISFIED ] - BICYCLE PARKING NEEDS TO BE
 DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOUT THE SITE BASED UPON THE USES ON
 THE PROPERTY, AND SHALL BE SITUATED IN PROXIMITY TO
 BUILDING ENTRANCE, ETC. SO AS TO BE VISIBLE TO PATRONS.
 THE LOCATION OF THE BICYCLE PARKING FOR BUILDING #1 IS
 OF GREATEST CONCERN.
  
 25. [ SATISFIED] - WITH THE CREATION OF THE DEAD-END
 DRIVE AISLE UNDERNEATH THE EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING, A
 TURN-AROUND SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 26. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - WITH THE CREATION OF THE
 DEAD-END DRIVE AISLE UNDERNEATH THE PROPOSED PARKING
 DECK, A TURN-AROUND SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 27. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - THE BICYCLE PARKING
 PROVIDED WEST OF THE EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING APPEARS
 TO BE ENCROACHING INTO THE DRIVE AISLE AND COULD EASILY
 BE DAMAGED BY PASSING VEHICLES, ETC.
  
 27.1. [ NEW COMMENT ] ? STAFF DOES NOT LIKE HOW THE
 PROPOSED BIKE RACKS ARE BEING INSTALLED AT THE SAME
 GRADE AS THE SURROUNDING PARKING/LOADING AREA. THE BIKE
 RACK AREA SHOULD BE RAISED ABOVE THE LEVEL OF THE
 PARKING AND PROTECTED WITH CURBING, ETC.
  
 28. [ SATISFIED ] - LANDSCAPING AROUND THE BASE OF THE
 ENCLOSURE IS REQUIRED.
  
 29. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - PLEASE CLARIFY THE DESIGN
 PROPOSED IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF THE WAREHOUSE BUILDING.
 IS CURBING PROPOSED BETWEEN THE DRIVEWAY AND THE FRONT
 ENTRANCE? IF NOT, AND THE DRIVEWAY IS AT THE SAME
 ELEVATION AS THE ENTRY, SOME FORM OF
 PEDESTRIAN-FRIENDLY BARRIER SHOULD BE CONSIDERED TO
 KEEP VEHICLES FROM ENCROACHING INTO THE PEDESTRIAN
 AREA.
  
 29.1. [ NEW COMMENT ] ? THE SITE PLAN HAS BECOME
 EXTREMELY UNCLEAR AS TO WHAT EACH LINE TYPE, THICKNESS,
 ETC. REPRESENTS.
  
 30. [ SATISFIED ] - THERE IS A LARGE AMOUNT OF UTILITY
 EQUIPMENT (WATER METERS, BACKFLOW, ETC.) IMMEDIATELY IN
 FRONT OF THE PROPOSED GROCER; SUCH EQUIPMENT NEEDS TO
 BE SCREENED.
  
 31. [ SATISFIED ] - THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOW A
 DOOR EXITING THE FRONT OF THE GROCER WITH A SET OF
 STAIRS LEADING DOWN. PLEASE CLARIFY AS THIS IS NOT
 SHOWN ON ANY OTHER PLAN.
  
 32. [ SATISFIED ] - ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS IT APPEARS
 THAT THERE IS NOT SUFFICIENT CLEAR WIDTH BETWEEN THE
 HANDICAP PARKING SIGNS, CAUSING THIS ROUTE TO NOT BE
 ADA COMPLIANT. PLEASE VERIFY.
  
 33. [ SATISFIED ] - ON THE SITE PLAN, THE DETAIL FOR
 THE SECOND LEVEL OF THE PARKING DECK HAS A LABEL FOR A
 TYPICAL LIGHT POLE THAT IS PLACED INCORRECTLY.
  
 34. [ NEW COMMENT ] ? THE CONFIGURATION OF THE DUMPSTER
 TO THE NORTHWEST OF BUILDING #1 DIFFERS FROM THAT WHICH
 WAS SHOWN ON THE MAJOR AMENDMENT. ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS
 ARE CONSISTENT.
  
 35. [ NEW COMMENT ] - THE TURNING MOVEMENTS SHOWN ON
 THE SITE PLAN FOR THE DUMPSTER TO THE NORTHWEST OF
 BUILDING #1 ONLYS SHOW THE TRUCK MOVEMENTS ENTERING TO
 PICK UP THE DUMPSTER; NO MOVEMENTS ARE SHOWN ON HOW THE
 TRUCK IS EXITING THE SITE.
  
 36. [ NEW COMMENT ] ? THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AT THE
 SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BUILDING #1 LEADS INTO A LANDSCAPE
 AREA; NO RAMP, SIDEWALK, ETC. IS SHOWN TO CONNECT THIS
 CROSSING TO THE SIDEWALK TO THE EAST OF BUILDING #1.
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) FOUR (4) SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS
 SHALL BE PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY
 (11IN X 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 09-06-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 09-06-2019 Time 09:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 09-05-2019 Time 15:12 Sent To  
Notes
2019-09-06 09:41:36PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 (RESUBMITTAL)
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 09.05.2019
 PROJECT NO.: Z19050026
 CASE NO.: PB1086B
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS WHICH WERE ISSUED PREVIOUSLY, AND HAVE
 NOT BEEN FULLY SATISFIED:
  
 1. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - UTILITY LETTERS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED INDICATING NO OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED
 IMPROVEMENTS.
  
 1.1. [ NEW COMMENT ] - LETTERS FROM FPL AND AT&T SHALL
 BE PROVIDED.
  
 2. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - THE SITE PLAN IS UNCLEAR
 AS TO WHAT IMPROVEMENTS ARE EXISTING AND WHICH ONES ARE
 PROPOSED. AS SUCH, IT IS DIFFICULT TO DETERMINE WHAT IS
 NONCONFORMING AND MAY NEED TO BE BROUGHT INTO
 COMPLIANCE, ETC.
  
 2.1. [ NEW COMMENT ] - THERE APPEARS TO BE A NUMBER OF
 IMPROVEMENTS TO THE WEST OF, AND UNDERNEATH, THE
 EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING THAT ARE NOT SHOWN AS BEING
 INCLUDED IN THE ?AFFECTED AREA?. THE IMPROVEMENTS
 INCLUDE THE ADDITION OF BICYCLE PARKING, A DUMPSTER
 ENCLOSURE, TERMINATION OF THE PARKING DRIVE AISLE
 UNDERNEATH THE BUILDING DUE TO THE RAMP FOR THE PARKING
 DECK, ETC. PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE ARE NEW COMMENTS
 PROVIDED THAT RELATE TO ADDITIONAL CONCERNS WITH THESE
 ITEMS.
  
 3. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - AS A FOLLOW UP TO PREVIOUS
 DISCUSSIONS, WHAT IS THE LATEST REGARDING THE DESIGN OF
 THE FUTURE GROCER AND THE ACTIVATION OF THE SOUTH DIXIE
 HIGHWAY CORRIDOR?
  
 3.1. [ NEW COMMENT ] - A SMALL OUTDOOR SEATING AREA WAS
 ADDED TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS, BUT THIS IS NOT SHOWN
 ON THE SITE OR LANDSCAPE PLANS. ADDITIONALLY, IT IS
 UNCLEAR HOW THIS SEATING AREA CAN BE ACCESSED.
  
 4. [ SATISFIED ] - THE SITE PLAN IS UNCLEAR AS TO THE
 LOCATION OF THE RAMP THAT PROVIDES ACCESS TO THE TOP OF
 THE PARKING DECK. IT SEEMS THAT THE RAMP MAY IMPEDE
 WITH MULTIPLE DRIVE AISLES AND OVERALL SITE
 CIRCULATION, IMPACTING EXISTING PARKING.
  
 5. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - THE PROPOSED PARKING DECK
 APPEARS TO CONFLICT WITH MULTIPLE UTILITY LINES,
 ESPECIALLY A WATER MAIN LOCATED WITHIN A 10-FOOT
 EASEMENT AND A SIX (6) FOOT UNDERGROUND UTILITY
 EASEMENT.
  
 5.1. [ NEW COMMENT ] - A PORTION OF THE PARKING DECK
 (NORTHEAST CORNER) STILL EXTENDS INTO THE SIX (6) FOOT
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY EASEMENT.
  
 5.2. [ CONDITION OF APPROVAL ] - THE SITE PLAN SHOWS A
 PROPOSED 10-FOOT WATER EASEMENT, BUT WHAT IS PROPOSED
 TO HAPPEN WITH THE EXISTING EASEMENT THAT IS SHOWN
 UNDER THE PROPOSED PARKING DECK? THE ENGINEERING PLANS
 INDICATE THAT THIS IS GOING TO BE ABANDONED. IF SO, THE
 UTILITY WORK, AND MODIFICATIONS TO THE EASEMENT WILL BE
 REQUIRED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY PERMITS FOR THE
 PARKING DECK.
  
 5.3. [ NEW COMMENT ] - A NUMBER OF IMPROVEMENTS ARE
 SHOWN IN THE 12-FOOT FPL EASEMENT IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF
 THE WAREHOUSE BUILDING.
  
 5.4. [ NEW COMMENT ] - A NUMBER OF IMPROVEMENTS ARE
 SHOWN IN THE FPL EASEMENT WEST OF THE EXISTING OFFICE
 BUILDING.
  
 6. [ SATISFIED ] - THE PARKING DECK SHOULD BE ADDED
 INTO THE SITE DATA TABLE FOR ALL APPLICABLE
 CALCULATIONS (LOT COVERAGE, IMPERVIOUS, BUILDING
 SETBACKS, BUILDING HEIGHT, ETC.). IT IS REQUIRED TO
 COMPLY WITH THE SAME REGULATIONS AS OTHER BUILDINGS IN
 THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) ZONING DISTRICT.
  
 7. [ SATISFIED ] - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-145(7), THE
 MINIMUM BUILDING SEPARATION SHALL BE ZERO FEET, OR NOT
 LESS THAN TEN (10) FEET. ACCORDING TO THE SITE PLAN,
 THE PARKING DECK IS ONLY 4.5 FEET FROM THE EXISTING
 OFFICE BUILDING.
  
 8. [ SATISFIED ] - BY DEFINITION, THE FRONT OF THE
 PROPERTY IS ALONG BELVEDERE ROAD AND MONCEAUX ROAD;
 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY IS CONSIDERED A CORNER-SIDE.
  
 9. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED - SEE CONDITION OF APPROVAL
 BELOW ] - IN DISCUSSION AMONGST STAFF, IT WAS SUGGESTED
 THAT SINCE A LINER BUILDING IS NOT BEING PROPOSED ALONG
 SOUTH DIXIE (IN FRONT OF THE PARKING DECK, ETC.) THAT
 SOME ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS OR DECORATIVE FEATURES
 (SUCH AS A TRELLIS, ETC.) COULD BE INCORPORATED INTO,
 OR IN PLACE OF, THE EASTERN MOST ROW OF PARKING.
  
 9.1. [ NEW COMMENT ] - WHAT WAS THE OBJECTION TO THE
 INSTALLATION OF A TRELLIS, ETC.?
  
 9.2. [ CONDITION OF APPROVAL ] - THE PROVISION OF BUS
 SHELTER AND THE DESIGN OF SUCH SHALL BE INCLUDED AS
 PART OF THE FUTURE MAJOR AMENDMENT.
  
 10. [ SATISFIED ] - THERE SEEMS TO BE A LARGE NUMBER OF
 SMALL CAR SPACES CONCENTRATED IN SOME OF THE AREA WHERE
 PARKING DEMAND WILL BE HEAVIEST. PURSUANT TO SEC.
 94-485(N)(1)E., SMALL CAR SPACES ARE TO BE DISTRIBUTED.
  
 11. [ SATISFIED ] - YOU WILL NEED TO CONFIRM WITH THE
 BUILDING DIVISION, BUT ACCESSIBLE PARKING MAY NEED TO
 BE PROVIDED UNDER THE COVER OF THE PARKING DECK.
  
 12. [ SATISFIED - SEE CONDITION OF APPROVAL BELOW ] -
 THE SQUARE FOOTAGES IN THE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND PBC
 TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION DO NOT SEEM TO
 CORRESPOND WITH THE SQUARE FOOTAGES THAT ARE SHOWN ON
 THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS, STUDIES,
 ETC. ARE CONSISTENT.
  
 12.1. [ CONDITION OF APPROVAL ] - A CONDITION OF
 APPROVAL WILL EXIST REGARDING THE MAXIMUM SQUARE
 FOOTAGE THAT CAN BE OCCUPIED, AND THAT THE TRAFFIC
 ANALYSIS AND CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION BE UPDATED AS
 PART OF FUTURE DEVELOPMENT.
  
 13. [ SATISFIED - SEE CONDITION OF APPROVAL BELOW ] -
 THE TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION LETTER FROM PALM
 BEACH COUNTY INDICATES THAT THE PROJECT IS TO ?MEET
 CRITERIA AS OUTLINED IN THE CITY?S TDM (TRANSPORTATION
 DEMAND MANAGEMENT) ORDINANCE.? PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS
 AS THERE IS NO TDM ORDINANCE THAT HAS BEEN ADOPTED FOR
 THIS AREA.
  
 13.1. [ CONDITION OF APPROVAL ] - A CONDITION OF
 APPROVAL WILL EXIST REGARDING THE MAXIMUM SQUARE
 FOOTAGE THAT CAN BE OCCUPIED.
  
 14. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
 REFERENCES THAT THE PROJECT WILL BE PARTICIPATING IN
 THE CITY?S MOBILITY FUNDS PROGRAM; PLEASE NOTE THAT NO
 SUCH PROGRAM HAS BEEN ADOPTED, AND UNDER THE ?PROPOSED?
 PROGRAM, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS OUTSIDE THE BOUNDARIES
 OF SUCH PROGRAM.
  
 14.1. [ NEW COMMENT ] - THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
 SHOULD HAVEN BEEN REVISED TO REMOVE REFERENCE TO THE
 MOBILITY FUND AND TDM PROGRAM.
  
 15. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - PURSUANT TO THE PBC
 TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION LETTER, AN FDOT
 CONCEPTUAL DRIVEWAY PRE-APPROVAL LETTER SHALL BE
 OBTAINED. SPECIAL ATTENTION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
 REGARDING THE COUNTY?S SUGGESTION OF A CENTER LEFT TURN
 LANE.
  
 15.1. [ NEW COMMENT ] - THE LETTER FROM FDOT INDICATES
 THAT ALL OF THE DRIVEWAYS ARE RIGHT IN/RIGHT OUT, BUT
 THE STRIPING AND DESIGN SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT
 INDICATE SUCH.
  
 16. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - SIDEWALKS/CROSSINGS SHALL
 BE PROVIDED FROM THE PEDESTRIAN EXIT POINTS OF THE
 PARKING DECK TO BUILDINGS #1 AND #3.
  
 16.1. [ NEW COMMENT ] - THERE?S CONCERN REGARDING THE
 DESIGN OF THE CROSSWALK, STOP SIGN, ETC. THAT IS
 PROPOSED IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE PARKING DECK.
 THE STOP SIGN APPEARS TO BE FLOATING IN THE DRIVE
 AISLE, PEDESTRIANS ARE DIRECTED TO WALK IN FRONT OF
 VEHICLES BEFORE CROSSING THE DRIVEWAY, ETC. THE
 ISLAND/LANDING AT THE BASE OF THE STAIRS SHOULD BE
 EXTENDED TO THE EDGE OF THE DRIVE AISLE, ALLOWING FOR
 PLACEMENT OF THE STOP SIGN, AND THE CROSS WALK CAN GO
 FROM THE SOUTH EDGE OF THE LANDING.
  
 17. [ SATISFIED - SEE CONDITION OF APPROVAL BELOW ] -
 SIGNAGE SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THE ARCHITECTURAL
 DRAWINGS AND SHOULD BE REVIEWED AS A SEPARATE SIGN
 PACKAGE.
  
 17.1. [ CONDITION OF APPROVAL ] - ALL SIGNAGE WILL BE
 REVIEWED AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING AND SHALL COMPLY
 WITH THE ZLDRS.
  
 18. [ SATISFIED - SEE CONDITION OF APPROVAL BELOW ] -
 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED FOR
 REVIEW OF THE FREESTANDING SIGNS:
  
 18.1. [ SATISFIED - SEE CONDITION OF APPROVAL BELOW ] -
 SETBACK SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM ALL FREESTANDING SIGNS
 TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE, AND SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF SEC. 94-408(D)(2) AND (3).
  
 18.2. [ SATISFIED - SEE CONDITION OF APPROVAL BELOW ] -
 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF FREESTANDING SIGN AREA SHALL BE
 PROVIDED AND SHALL COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE
 PROVISIONS OF SEC. 94-408(D)(2) AND (3).
  
 18.3. [ CONDITION OF APPROVAL ] - ALL SIGNAGE WILL BE
 REVIEWED AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING AND SHALL COMPLY
 WITH THE ZLDRS.
  
 19. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - SCREENING SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR
 THE TRASH COMPACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 94-315(A).
  
 19.1. [ NEW COMMENT ] - STAFF DOES NOT UNDERSTAND THE
 RESPONSE THAT WAS PROVIDED. PLEASE CLARIFY HOW THE
 TRASH COMPACTOR IS PROPOSED TO COMPLY WITH THE CITED
 PROVISION OF THE CITY?S ZLDRS.
  
 20. [ SATISFIED ] - IT IS STAFF'S POSITION THAT
 LANDSCAPING SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE OUTER PERIMETER
 OF THE PARKING DECK (SPECIFICALLY THE EAST AND SOUTH
 SIDES) TO SOFTEN THE APPEARANCE OF THE STRUCTURE AND
 MAKE IT BLEND IN WITH THE REMAINDER OF THE SITE.
  
 21. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - MULTIPLE STRUCTURAL
 COLUMNS FOR THE PARKING DECK ENCROACH INTO DRIVE
 AISLES, PARKING SPACES, ETC. ON THE GROUND LEVEL.
  
 21.1. [ NEW COMMENT ] - PLEASE CONFIRM THAT NO COLUMNS
 ARE PROPOSED ON THE INTERIOR (GROUND LEVEL) OF THE
 PARKING DECK. IF COLUMNS ARE PROPOSED, THEY SHALL BE
 SHOWN ON THE PLAN TO INDICATE THAT THEY DO NOT CONFLICT
 WITH PARKING SPACES OR DRIVE AISLES AND/OR THAT THE
 STRIPING IS ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY TO ACCOMMODATE THEM.
  
 22. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - THE PARKING STALL DETAIL ON
 SHEET 12 OF THE ENGINEERING PLANS SHALL CONFORM TO THE
 CITY?S MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS.
  
 23. [ SATISFIED ] - THE BICYCLE PARKING DETAIL
 REFERENCES THE SITE PLAN FOR DIMENSIONS, ETC., BUT NO
 DIMENSIONS WERE PROVIDED.
  
 24. [ SATISFIED ] - BICYCLE PARKING NEEDS TO BE
 DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOUT THE SITE BASED UPON THE USES ON
 THE PROPERTY, AND SHALL BE SITUATED IN PROXIMITY TO
 BUILDING ENTRANCE, ETC. SO AS TO BE VISIBLE TO PATRONS.
 THE LOCATION OF THE BICYCLE PARKING FOR BUILDING #1 IS
 OF GREATEST CONCERN.
  
 25. [ NEW COMMENT ] - WITH THE CREATION OF THE DEAD-END
 DRIVE AISLE UNDERNEATH THE EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING, A
 TURN-AROUND SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 26. [ NEW COMMENT ] - WITH THE CREATION OF THE DEAD-END
 DRIVE AISLE UNDERNEATH THE PROPOSED PARKING DECK, A
 TURN-AROUND SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 27. [ NEW COMMENT ] - THE BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED WEST
 OF THE EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING APPEARS TO BE
 ENCROACHING INTO THE DRIVE AISLE AND COULD EASILY BE
 DAMAGED BY PASSING VEHICLES, ETC.
  
 28. [ NEW COMMENT ] - LANDSCAPING AROUND THE BASE OF
 THE ENCLOSURE IS REQUIRED.
  
 29. [ NEW COMMENT ] - PLEASE CLARIFY THE DESIGN
 PROPOSED IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF THE WAREHOUSE BUILDING.
 IS CURBING PROPOSED BETWEEN THE DRIVEWAY AND THE FRONT
 ENTRANCE? IF NOT, AND THE DRIVEWAY IS AT THE SAME
 ELEVATION AS THE ENTRY, SOME FORM OF
 PEDESTRIAN-FRIENDLY BARRIER SHOULD BE CONSIDERED TO
 KEEP VEHICLES FROM ENCROACHING INTO THE PEDESTRIAN
 AREA.
  
 30. [ NEW COMMENT ] - THERE IS A LARGE AMOUNT OF
 UTILITY EQUIPMENT (WATER METERS, BACKFLOW, ETC.)
 IMMEDIATELY IN FRONT OF THE PROPOSED GROCER; SUCH
 EQUIPMENT NEEDS TO BE SCREENED.
  
 31. [ NEW COMMENT ] - THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOW
 A DOOR EXITING THE FRONT OF THE GROCER WITH A SET OF
 STAIRS LEADING DOWN. PLEASE CLARIFY AS THIS IS NOT
 SHOWN ON ANY OTHER PLAN.
  
 32. [ NEW COMMENT ] - ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS IT
 APPEARS THAT THERE IS NOT SUFFICIENT CLEAR WIDTH
 BETWEEN THE HANDICAP PARKING SIGNS, CAUSING THIS ROUTE
 TO NOT BE ADA COMPLIANT. PLEASE VERIFY.
  
 33. [ NEW COMMENT ] - ON THE SITE PLAN, THE DETAIL FOR
 THE SECOND LEVEL OF THE PARKING DECK HAS A LABEL FOR A
 TYPICAL LIGHT POLE THAT IS PLACED INCORRECTLY.
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) FOUR (4) SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS
 SHALL BE PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY
 (11IN X 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
 ___________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-12-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 06-12-2019 Time 11:19 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 06-12-2019 Time 11:19 Sent To  
Notes
2019-06-12 11:20:07PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ___________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 06.12.2019
 PROJECT NO.: Z19050026
 CASE NO.: PB 1086B
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. UTILITY LETTERS SHALL BE PROVIDED INDICATING NO
 OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS.
  
 2. THE SITE PLAN IS UNCLEAR AS TO WHAT IMPROVEMENTS ARE
 EXISTING AND WHICH ONES ARE PROPOSED. AS SUCH, IT IS
 DIFFICULT TO DETERMINE WHAT IS NONCONFORMING AND MAY
 NEED TO BE BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE, ETC.
  
 3. AS A FOLLOW UP TO PREVIOUS DISCUSSIONS, WHAT IS THE
 LATEST REGARDING THE DESIGN OF THE FUTURE GROCER AND
 THE ACTIVATION OF THE SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY CORRIDOR?
  
 4. THE SITE PLAN IS UNCLEAR AS TO THE LOCATION OF THE
 RAMP THAT PROVIDES ACCESS TO THE TOP OF THE PARKING
 DECK. IT SEEMS THAT THE RAMP MAY IMPEDE WITH MULTIPLE
 DRIVE AISLES AND OVERALL SITE CIRCULATION, IMPACTING
 EXISTING PARKING.
  
 5. THE PROPOSED PARKING DECK APPEARS TO CONFLICT WITH
 MULTIPLE UTILITY LINES, ESPECIALLY A WATER MAIN LOCATED
 WITHIN A 10-FOOT EASEMENT AND A SIX (6) FOOT
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY EASEMENT.
  
 6. THE PARKING DECK SHOULD BE ADDED INTO THE SITE DATA
 TABLE FOR ALL APPLICABLE CALCULATIONS (LOT COVERAGE,
 IMPERVIOUS, BUILDING SETBACKS, BUILDING HEIGHT, ETC.).
 IT IS REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE SAME REGULATIONS AS
 OTHER BUILDINGS IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) ZONING
 DISTRICT).
  
 7. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-145(7), THE MINIMUM BUILDING
 SEPARATION SHALL BE ZERO FEET, OR NOT LESS THAN TEN
 (10) FEET. ACCORDING TO THE SITE PLAN, THE PARKING DECK
 IS ONLY 4.5 FEET FROM THE EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING.
  
 8. BY DEFINITION, THE FRONT OF THE PROPERTY IS ALONG
 BELVEDERE ROAD AND MONCEAUX ROAD; SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY
 IS CONSIDERED A CORNER-SIDE.
  
 9. IN DISCUSSION AMONGST STAFF, IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT
 SINCE A LINER BUILDING IS NOT BEING PROPOSED ALONG
 SOUTH DIXIE (IN FRONT OF THE PARKING DECK, ETC.) THAT
 SOME ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS OR DECORATIVE FEATURES
 (SUCH AS TRELLIS?, ETC.) COULD BE INCORPORATED INTO, OR
 IN PLACE OF, THE EASTERN MOST ROW OF PARKING.
  
 10. THERE SEEMS TO BE A LARGE NUMBER OF SMALL CAR
 SPACES CONCENTRATED IN SOME OF THE AREA WHERE PARKING
 DEMAND WILL BE HEAVIEST. PURSUANT TO SEC.
 94-485(N)(1)E., SMALL CAR SPACES ARE TO BE DISTRIBUTED.
  
 11. YOU WILL NEED TO CONFIRM WITH THE BUILDING
 DIVISION, BUT ACCESSIBLE PARKING MAY NEED TO BE
 PROVIDED UNDER THE COVER OF THE PARKING DECK.
  
 12. THE SQUARE FOOTAGES IN THE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND PBC
 TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION DO NOT SEEM TO
 CORRESPOND WITH THE SQUARE FOOTAGES THAT ARE SHOWN ON
 THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS, STUDIES,
 ETC. ARE CONSISTENT.
  
 13. THE TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION LETTER FROM
 PALM BEACH COUNTY INDICATES THAT THE PROJECT IS TO
 ?MEET CRITERIA AS OUTLINED IN THE CITY?S TDM
 (TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT) ORDINANCE.? PLEASE
 PROVIDE DETAILS AS THERE IS NO TDM ORDINANCE THAT HAS
 BEEN ADOPTED FOR THIS AREA.
  
 14. THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REFERENCES THAT THE
 PROJECT WILL BE PARTICIPATING IN THE CITY?S MOBILITY
 FUNDS PROGRAM; PLEASE NOTE THAT NO SUCH PROGRAM HAS
 BEEN ADOPTED, AND UNDER THE ?PROPOSED? PROGRAM, THE
 SUBJECT PROPERTY IS OUTSIDE THE BOUNDARIES OF SUCH
 PROGRAM.
  
 15. PURSUANT TO THE PBC TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY
 DETERMINATION LETTER, AN FDOT CONCEPTUAL DRIVEWAY
 PRE-APPROVAL LETTER SHALL BE OBTAINED. SPECIAL
 ATTENTION SHOULD BE PROVIDED REGARDING THE COUNTY?S
 SUGGESTION OF A CENTER LEFT TURN LANE.
  
 16. SIDEWALKS/CROSSINGS SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM THE
 PEDESTRIAN EXIT POINTS OF THE PARKING DECK TO BUILDINGS
 #1 AND #3.
  
 17. SIGNAGE SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THE ARCHITECTURAL
 DRAWINGS AND SHOULD BE REVIEWED AS A SEPARATE SIGN
 PACKAGE.
  
 18. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED FOR
 REVIEW OF THE FREESTANDING SIGNS:
  
 18.1. SETBACK SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM ALL FREESTANDING
 SIGNS TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE, AND SHALL COMPLY
 WITH THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF SEC. 94-408(D)(2) AND
 (3).
  
 18.2. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF FREESTANDING SIGN AREA SHALL BE
 PROVIDED AND SHALL COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE
 PROVISIONS OF SEC. 94-408(D)(2) AND (3).
  
 19. SCREENING SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE TRASH COMPACTOR
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 94-315(A).
  
 20. IT IS STAFF?S POSITION THAT LANDSCAPING SHALL BE
 PROVIDED ALONG THE OUTER PERIMETER OF THE PARKING DECK
 (SPECIFICALLY THE EAST AND SOUTH SIDES) TO SOFTEN THE
 APPEARANCE OF THE STRUCTURE AND MAKE IT BLEND IN WITH
 THE REMAINDER OF THE SITE.
  
 21. MULTIPLE STRUCTURAL COLUMNS FOR THE PARKING DECK
 ENCROACH INTO DRIVE AISLES, PARKING SPACES, ETC. ON THE
 GROUND LEVEL.
  
 22. THE PARKING STALL DETAIL ON SHEET 12 OF THE
 ENGINEERING PLANS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY?S MINIMUM
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 23. THE BICYCLE PARKING DETAIL REFERENCES THE SITE PLAN
 FOR DIMENSIONS, ETC., BUT NO DIMENSIONS WERE PROVIDED.
  
 24. BICYCLE PARKING NEEDS TO BE DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOUT
 THE SITE BASED UPON THE USES ON THE PROPERTY, AND SHALL
 BE SITUATED IN PROXIMITY TO BUILDING ENTRANCE, ETC. SO
 AS TO BE VISIBLE TO PATRONS. THE LOCATION OF THE
 BICYCLE PARKING FOR BUILDING #1 IS OF GREATEST CONCERN.
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) FOUR (4) SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS
 SHALL BE PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY
 (11IN X 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
 ___________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved