Plan Review Details - Project Z19050024
Plan Review Stops For Project Z19050024
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status P Date 08-21-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 08-21-2020 Time 21:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 08-21-2020 Time 21:01 Sent To  
Notes
2020-08-21 21:05:04DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 THE 7/24/20 COMMENT REPONSE LETTER FROM SCHMIDT NICHOLS
 STATES THAT THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WILL BE FULLY
 ADDRESSED DURING PERMIT REVIEW AS THE "CURRENT DRAWING
 INDICATES A SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF THE INTENDED SOLUTION
 AND WILL BE RESOLVED DURING THE DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
 PHASE WITHIN THE CONFINES OF THE FINAL THEATER DESIGN":
  
 EGRESS FROM THEATER.
 ORIGINAL COMMENT: SECOND FLOOR PLAN A-1.02 SHOWS A LONG
 NARROW STAIR FLIGHT LOCATED BETWEEN CINEMA 5 AND CINEMA
 6 BUT THE STAIR DOES NOT SEEM TO LINE UP WITH THE
 LOCATION AND CONFIGURATION OF THE STAIR SHOWN ON FIRST
 FLOOR PLAN A1.01 OR MEZZANINE LEVEL PLAN A-1.01A.
 COMMENT ON SECOND REVIEW: THE LONG NARROW STAIR LOCATED
 BETWEEN CINEMA 5 AND CINEMA 6 SEEMS TO PROVIDE EGRESS
 FROM THE PROJECTOR BOOTH CATWALK LEVEL ABOVE THE
 THEATER LOBBY, BUT THE PLANS DO NOT SEEM TO SHOW WHERE
 THAT STAIR COMES OUT (THE EXIT DISCHARGE) AT 1ST FLOOR
 LEVEL. THE STAIR IS STILL NOT SHOWN ON FIRST FLOOR PLAN
 A1.01 OR MEZZANINE LEVEL PLAN A-1.01A.
 COMMENT ON REVISED PLANS SUBMITTED 12/20/19: THE EXIT
 STAIR FROM CATWALK IS NOW SHOWN TO DISCHARGE TO THE
 OUTSIDE BALCONY. IN FACT, THERE ARE NUMEROUS EXIT DOORS
 SHOWN AS DISCHARGING TO THE OUTSIDE BALCONY (2ND FLOOR
 LEVEL) BUT THERE IS NO EGRESS STAIR SHOWN TO TAKE
 PEOPLE DOWN FROM THAT BALCONY SO THAT THEY CAN EXIT THE
 BUILDING AT THE 1ST FLOOR. THE COMMENT RESPONSE LETTER
 STATES THAT SHEET A1.02 SHOWS CONNECTION FROM THE STAIR
 BETWEEN CINEMA 5 AND CINEMA 6, AND THE EXIT STAIR AT
 1ST FLOOR LEVEL UNDER THE CINEMA 6 UPPER PLATFORM.
 THERE IS NO OPENING SHOWN IN THE WALL BETWEEN THE TWO
 STAIRS AND, IF AN EGRESS STAIR SERVES THE OUTSIDE
 BALCONY, NO SUCH CONNECTION IS NEEDED FOR THE
 OCCUPANT(S) OF THE PROJECTOR BOOTH CATWALK.
  
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  

Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 01-15-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 01-15-2020 Time 18:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 01-15-2020 Time 18:55 Sent To  
Notes
2020-01-15 18:55:52DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 THE COMMENT NUMBERING FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW HAS BEEN
 MAINTAINED IN THE REVIEW BELOW.
  
 5. EGRESS FROM THEATER.
 ORIGINAL COMMENT: SECOND FLOOR PLAN A-1.02 SHOWS A LONG
 NARROW STAIR FLIGHT LOCATED BETWEEN CINEMA 5 AND CINEMA
 6 BUT THE STAIR DOES NOT SEEM TO LINE UP WITH THE
 LOCATION AND CONFIGURATION OF THE STAIR SHOWN ON FIRST
 FLOOR PLAN A1.01 OR MEZZANINE LEVEL PLAN A-1.01A.
 COMMENT ON SECOND REVIEW: THE LONG NARROW STAIR LOCATED
 BETWEEN CINEMA 5 AND CINEMA 6 SEEMS TO PROVIDE EGRESS
 FROM THE PROJECTOR BOOTH CATWALK LEVEL ABOVE THE
 THEATER LOBBY, BUT THE PLANS DO NOT SEEM TO SHOW WHERE
 THAT STAIR COMES OUT (THE EXIT DISCHARGE) AT 1ST FLOOR
 LEVEL. THE STAIR IS STILL NOT SHOWN ON FIRST FLOOR PLAN
 A1.01 OR MEZZANINE LEVEL PLAN A-1.01A.
 COMMENT ON REVISED PLANS SUBMITTED 12/20/19: THE EXIT
 STAIR FROM CATWALK IS NOW SHOWN TO DISCHARGE TO THE
 OUTSIDE BALCONY. IN FACT, THERE ARE NUMEROUS EXIT DOORS
 SHOWN AS DISCHARGING TO THE OUTSIDE BALCONY (2ND FLOOR
 LEVEL) BUT THERE IS NO EGRESS STAIR SHOWN TO TAKE
 PEOPLE DOWN FROM THAT BALCONY SO THAT THEY CAN EXIT THE
 BUILDING AT THE 1ST FLOOR. THE COMMENT RESPONSE LETTER
 STATES THAT SHEET A1.02 SHOWS CONNECTION FROM THE STAIR
 BETWEEN CINEMA 5 AND CINEMA 6, AND THE EXIT STAIR AT
 1ST FLOOR LEVEL UNDER THE CINEMA 6 UPPER PLATFORM.
 THERE IS NO OPENING SHOWN IN THE WALL BETWEEN THE TWO
 STAIRS AND, IF AN EGRESS STAIR SERVES THE OUTSIDE
 BALCONY, NO SUCH CONNECTION IS NEEDED FOR THE
 OCCUPANT(S) OF THE PROJECTOR BOOTH CATWALK.
  
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  

Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 12-06-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 12-06-2019 Time 14:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 12-06-2019 Time 14:33 Sent To  
Notes
2019-12-06 15:10:13THE SUBMITTED COMMENT RESPONSE LETTER SIMPLY STATES
 "ACKNOWLEDGED" FOR ALL COMMENTS EXCEPT COMMENT 7 FOR
 WHICH THE RESPONSE IS "THIS WILL BE ADDRESSED AT FINAL
 DESIGN IN BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW". SO THERE IS NO
 NARRATIVE TO STATE HOW THE COMMENTS ARE BEING
 ADDRESSED. IF THE PLANNER IS OK WITH DEFERRING
 RESPONSES ALL COMMENTS CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH THE
 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION, HOWEVER RESPONSE TO
 COMMENTS 2, 3 AND 5, ARE MOSTLY LIKELY TO AFFECT THE
 SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
  
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THE COMMENT NUMBERING FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW HAS
 BEEN MAINTAINED IN THE REVIEW BELOW. THOSE COMMENTS
 THAT HAVE BEEN "ACKNOWLEDGED" AND CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH
 THE PERMIT APPLICATION HAVE BEEN OMITTED FROM THIS 2ND
 REVIEW.
  
 2. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES.
 ORIGINAL COMMENT: GARAGE PARKING LEVEL PLANS A-107 AND
 A-108 SHOW REGULAR PARKING SPACES LOCATED CLOSER TO THE
 ELEVATORS THAN THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES IN THE
 FLAMINGO DRIVE PARKING GARAGE. PER SECTION 208.3 OF
 FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES
 ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF
 TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE.
 THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL COMPLY
 WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE.
 COMMENT ON REVISED PLANS: THE FLAMINGO DRIVE PARKING
 GARAGE IS SHOWN AS HAVING A TOTAL OF 270 PARKING SPACES
 (134 ON LEVEL 1 AND 136 ON LEVEL 2) BUT ONLY 4
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE SHOWN. PER SECTION 208.2
 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, 7 ACCESSIBLE PARKING
 SPACES ARE REQUIRED. THERE ARE STILL REGULAR PARKING
 SPACES THAT ARE CLOSER TO THE ELEVATORS THAN THE
 PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PER SECTION 208.3
 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING
 SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE
 OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE
 ENTRANCE. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL
 COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE.
  
 3. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES.
 PLEASE INDICATE THE VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ON
 THE PLANS. THIS IS THE ORIGINAL COMMENT: PER SECTION
 208.2.4 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX
 REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING
 STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND DESIGNED IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY
 CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT
 SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)
  
 5. EGRESS FROM THEATER LOBBY.
 ORIGINAL COMMENT: SECOND FLOOR PLAN A-1.02 SHOWS A LONG
 NARROW STAIR FLIGHT LOCATED BETWEEN CINEMA 5 AND CINEMA
 6 BUT THE STAIR DOES NOT SEEM TO LINE UP WITH THE
 LOCATION AND CONFIGURATION OF THE STAIR SHOWN ON FIRST
 FLOOR PLAN A1.01 OR MEZZANINE LEVEL PLAN A-1.01A.
 COMMENT ON REVISED PLANS: THE LONG NARROW STAIR LOCATED
 BETWEEN CINEMA 5 AND CINEMA 6 SEEMS TO PROVIDE EGRESS
 FROM THE PROJECTOR BOOTH CATWALK LEVEL ABOVE THE
 THEATER LOBBY, BUT THE PLANS DO NOT SEEM TO SHOW WHERE
 THAT STAIR COMES OUT (THE EXIT DISCHARGE) AT 1ST FLOOR
 LEVEL. THE STAIR IS STILL NOT SHOWN ON FIRST FLOOR PLAN
 A1.01 OR MEZZANINE LEVEL PLAN A-1.01A.
  
 8. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 9. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
 CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.
  
 10. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
 AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
 CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
 THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.
  
 11. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
 TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE
 ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  

Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-11-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 06-11-2019 Time 21:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 06-11-2019 Time 21:30 Sent To  
Notes
2019-06-11 21:45:15DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 2. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. GARAGE
 PARKING LEVEL PLANS A-107 AND A-108 SHOW REGULAR
 PARKING SPACES LOCATED CLOSER TO THE ELEVATORS THAN THE
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES IN THE FLAMING DRIVE PARKING
 GARAGE. PER SECTION 208.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY
 CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON
 THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT
 PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE. THE DESIGN OF
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 502
 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE
  
 3. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PER SECTION 208.2.4
 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX
 REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING
 STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND DESIGNED IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY
 CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT
 SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)
  
 4. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR
 THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT,
 AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 5. EGRESS FROM THEATER LOBBY. SECOND FLOOR PLAN A-10.2
 SHOWS A LONG NARROW STAIR FLIGHT LOCATED BETWEEN CINEMA
 5 AND CINEMA 6 BUT THE STAIR DOES NOT SEEM TO LINE UP
 WITH THE LOCATION AND CONFIGURATION OF THE STAIR SHOWN
 ON FIRST FLOOR PLAN A1.01 OR MEZZANINE LEVEL PLAN
 A-1.01A.
  
 6. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
 NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
 MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
 BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
 EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
 TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
 OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 7. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE
 REQUIRED. PLEASE CONTACT JEFFREY ODOMS, UTILITIES O&M
 SUPERINTENDENT, PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT, FATS OILS
 AND GREASE DIVISION, AT (561) 822-2172, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 8. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 9. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND
 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF
 CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES.
  
 10. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER
 AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE
 CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF
 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION
 THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY.
  
 11. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT
 TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE
 ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP
 ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC
 PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  

Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 6 Status P Date 10-01-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 10-01-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 10-01-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 5 Status F Date 09-23-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 09-23-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 09-23-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-09-23 16:42:52COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES
 CUSTOMER SERVICE, [email protected] OR 561-822-2262:
  
 RESPONSE TO PRIOR COMMENT DOES NOT MAKE SENSE:
  
 2.) RECORDED BACKFLOW COVENANTS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR
 ANY FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES LOCATED INSIDE
 BUILDINGS. MARK HURLEY CAN ASSIST WITH THAT PROCESS.
  
 RESPONSE: LIMITED IRRIGATION WATER WILL BE SOURCED FROM
 THE PROPOSED POTABLE METER. FINAL METER SIZING WILL BE
 COORDINATED AS PART OF THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS /
 PERMIT SUBMITTALS.
 NEW COMMENTS:
  
 -PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT MAY NOT BE LOCATED UNDER GUY
 WIRES. THIS LOOKS TO BE THE CASE AT BARCELONA. IF SO,
 PLEASE RELOCATE.
  
 -DURING ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, VERIFY PROPOSED FIRE
 HYDRANT AT CORDOVA HAS NO CLEARANCE ISSUES WITH STREET
 SIGNS. IF CONFLICT EXISTS, LOCATION WILL NEED TO BE
 ADJUSTED.
  
  

Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 4 Status F Date 08-13-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 08-13-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 08-13-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-08-13 11:05:24COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR,
 [email protected], 561-494-1098:
  
 FOR ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL:
  
 SHOW ADJACENT ADDRESSES ON FLAMINGO RD. WHERE UTILITIES
 ARE BEING REPLACED.
 ADD CITY OF WPB PAVEMENT RESTORATION NOTE.
 SHOW LENGTH OF PROPOSED UTILITIES IN ROW.
 SHOW PROFILE/CLEARANCES AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS.
 IDENTIFY ALL PROPOSED SANITARY TIE-INS.
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS.
  
  
 COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES
 CUSTOMER SERVICE, [email protected] OR 561-822-2262:
  
 -RECORDED BACKFLOW COVENANTS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ANY
 FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES LOCATED INSIDE BUILDINGS.
 MARK HURLEY CAN ASSIST WITH THAT PROCESS ?
 [email protected]
 -RECOMMEND DRAINS BE INSTALLED IN FIRE ROOMS CONTAINING
 FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES.
 -WILL IRRIGATION WATER BE USED FROM THE WATER SERVICES?
 IF SO, PLEASE ADD TO DEMAND CALCULATION AND VERIFY
 WATER SERVICES ARE SUFFICIENT.
 -ON FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL LABEL THE POINT OF
 SERVICE GATE VALVES FOR EACH FIRELINE WATER SERVICE.
 -RELOCATE GATE VALVES THAT ARE LOCATED IN THE PATH OF
 PEDESTRIAN FOOT TRAFFIC AND DOORS.
 -ARE ANY FIRE HYDRANTS PROPOSED TO BE INSTALLED?
 -RECOMMEND DUAL/PARALLEL BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES TO REDUCE
 OUTAGES DURING BACKFLOW MAINTENANCE.
 -THE FOOTPRINT OF THE WATER SERVICES, METERS, AND
 BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES MAY GET MUCH LARGER IF THEY ARE
 SIZED 3? OR GREATER. IF 3 IN. OR LARGER, USE THE
 ABOVE-GROUND STANDARD DETAIL.
 -IF THE WATER MAIN ON DIXIE IS 12 IN., WPB UTILITIES
 ENGINEER MAY PROVIDE MORE REQUIREMENTS AND DIRECTION.
 -WILL THE BUILDINGS BETWEEN BARCELONA AND FLAMINGO BE
 FED BY ONE DOMESTIC WATER METER, OR ARE WATER SERVICES
 MISSING FROM PLAN?
 -EXISTING WATER SERVICE TO PROPERTY WILL NEED TO BE
 IDENTIFIED ON ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL AND LABELED WITH
 WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THEM.
  

Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 3 Status F Date 01-07-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 01-07-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 01-07-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-01-07 15:38:22PREVIOUS PROVISOS NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 PLEASE ADD ADDRESS TO PLANS.
  
 PROVIDE LENGTHS IN FEET OF PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER
 LINES .
  
 LABEL MATERIAL AND SIZE OF EXISTING WATER AND SEWER
 LINES PROPOSED TO BE TAPPED FOR UTILITY SERVICES.
  
 PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND
 STORMWATER PIPES ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE.
  
 PLEASE CONFIRM THAT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST WAS
 SUBMITTED FOR ALL CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED
 UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE
 EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF
 UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE
 CONTACT JANICE TARBILL IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT AT [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR
 FURTHER ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR
 INFORMATION ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING
 FIELD SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.
  
 PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF
 ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES,
 INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND
 SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES,
 METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE
 SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING
 GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS,
 ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL
 INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER
 LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN
 VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. ADDITIONALLY,
 PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
 ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
 FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE
 AND CLEARANCES AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. ALL PROPOSED
 WATER MAIN SHALL BE SHOWN IN A PROFILE VIEW.
  
 SHOW VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION INFORMATION
 (NAVD 88 AND NGVD 29).
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND
 IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED
 AREAS.
  
 PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
 PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
  
 COORDINATE PROPOSED LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND METER
 PLACEMENTS DIRECTLY WITH MARK HURLEY, CITY OF WPB
 PUBLIC WORKS CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, AT
 561-822-2262 OR [email protected]
  
 FOR ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE DETAILED BLOW-UP ON
 PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW
 PREVENTION. PROVIDE UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS
 FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO PROPOSED UTILITIES INCLUDING
 WATER METERS.
  
 PLANS ARE DIFFICULT TO READ. PLEASE PROVIDE SEPARATE
 DRAINAGE AND WATER/SEWER PLAN SHEETS.
  
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS.
  
 RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR WPB, FL 33401 (MAILING
 ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402)
 MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098
 FAX: (561) 494-1116 MOBILE: (561) 246-9525
 EMAIL: [email protected] WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING
  

Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status P Date 10-11-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 10-11-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 10-11-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-11 09:26:14PASSED WITH PROVISOS:
  
 PLEASE INCLUDE CALCULATIONS ON ENGINEERING UTILITY
 PLANS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER &
 SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW
 DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER
 AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
 ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE.
  
 PLEASE CONFIRM THAT A SUBMITTAL FOR A FORMAL AS-BUILT
 REQUEST WAS MADE FOR ALL CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED
 UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE
 EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF
 UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE
 CONTACT JANICE TARBILL IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT AT [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR
 FURTHER ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR
 INFORMATION ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING
 FIELD SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.
  
 ENGINEERING PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND
 DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND
 SEWER LINES, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR
 WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL
 VALVES, METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON
 THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING
 GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS,
 ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL
 INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER
 LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN
 VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. ADDITIONALLY,
 PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
 ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
 FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE
 AND CLEARANCES AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. ALL PROPOSED
 WATER MAIN SHALL BE SHOWN IN A PROFILE VIEW.
  
 PLEASE SHOW VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION
 INFORMATION (NAVD 88 AND NGVD 29) ON ALL RELEVANT
 ENGINEERING PLAN SHEETS.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE PROJECT ADDRESS ON ENGINEERING PLAN
 COVER SHEET.
  
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS.
  
 RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX
 3366, ZIP 33402)
 MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098
 FAX: (561) 494-1116 MOBILE: (561) 246-9525
 EMAIL: [email protected] WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING
  
 MANNY GONZALEZ, SENIOR ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX
 3366, ZIP 33402)
 MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 DIRECT: (561) 494-1085
 FAX: (561) 494-1116 MOBILE: (561) 644-7301
 EMAIL: [email protected] WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING
  

Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-07-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 06-07-2019 Time   Rev Time 2.00
Received By rrossano Date 06-07-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-06-07 08:32:22PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS WERE REVIEWED. THERE ARE VARIOUS
 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS NOT MET, SEE COMMENTS BELOW.
  
 PLEASE COORDINATE WITH MS. UYEN (WEN) DANG OF THE CITY
 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT REGARDING COORDINATION WITH THE
 CITY?S SOUTH DIXIE IMPROVEMENT PLANS.
  
 PLEASE CONNECT ALL WATER SERVICES OFF OF S. DIXIE HWY.
 IT IS UNACCEPTABLE TO CONNECT TO 20 INCH WATER MAIN ON
 CORDOBA (SHOWN ON YOUR PLANS AS A 12 INCH WATER MAIN).
 CONTACT CITY CAD GROUP FOR FDOT ASBUILTS FOR DIXIE HWY.
  
 THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF REGULATIONS
 AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY AFFECT THE
 DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND WASTEWATER
 UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE DEVELOPMENT
 PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK BELOW:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WPB_W
 EBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FULL-P
 ACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97B19
 60045731D3658206F27451722716EF
 THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE
 FOUND HERE:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR
 MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA,
 CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08, ADOPTED SEPT. 22,
 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18)
 CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL,
 SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER
 SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY.
  
 THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE
 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY
 BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS,
 BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION.
  
 PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM AND PEAK)
 AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PER FAC
 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER.
  
 PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER ALONG
 ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE.
  
 PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY OF
 WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT
 OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF YOUR
 PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE
 MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL
 IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
 [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER
 ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION
 ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD
 SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC.
  
 AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED,
 STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR
 MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI
 CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL
  
 PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF
 ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES,
 INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND
 SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES,
 METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE
 SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING
 GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS,
 ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL
 INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER
 LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN
 VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. ADDITIONALLY,
 PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC,
 ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION
 FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE
 AND CLEARANCES AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. ALL PROPOSED
 WATER MAIN SHALL BE SHOWN IN A PROFILE VIEW.
  
 SHOW VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION INFORMATION
 (NAVD 88 AND NGVD 29).
  
 CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY
 ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY
 RIGHT OF WAY.
  
 PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE
 DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB
 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION).
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND
 IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED
 AREAS.
  
 PROVIDE UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY
 PERSONNEL TO PROPOSED UTILITIES INCLUDING WATER METERS.
  
 PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR
 PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS.
  
 PROVIDE DETAILED BLOW-UP ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION
 OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION.
  
 PLANS ARE DIFFICULT TO READ. PLEASE PROVIDE SEPARATE
 DRAINAGE AND WATER/SEWER PLAN SHEETS.
  
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS.
  
 RICK ROSSANO
 PROJECT COORDINATOR
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
 (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402)
 MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200
 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098
 FAX: (561) 494-1116
 MOBILE: (561) 246-9525
 EMAIL: [email protected]
 WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING
  
 MANNY GONZALEZ
 SENIOR ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
 (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402)
 MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200
 DIRECT: (561) 494-1085
 FAX: (561) 494-1116
 MOBILE: (561) 644-7301
 EMAIL: [email protected]
 WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING
  
 CENTRAL OPERATIONS CENTER (DISPATCH):
 24-HOUR EMERGENCY RESPONSE SERVICES TO PUBLIC
 UTILITIES, PUBLIC WORKS, PARKS, ETC. 561-822-2210
  
  

Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 06-04-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 06-04-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 06-04-2019 Time 12:53 Sent To  
Notes
2019-06-04 13:08:29THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
 6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,
 PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,
 INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE
 OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)
  
 7. THE SEPARATION AND OPENING PROTECTION BETWEEN THE
 PARKING GARAGE AND OTHER OCCUPANCIES SHALL BE IN
 ACCORDANCE AND COMPLIANCE WITH THE SPECIFIC AND MOST
 STRINGENT PROVISION REQUIREMENT OF EITHER CHAPTER OF
 THE FIRE CODE.
  
 8. SMOKE ALARMS ARE REQUIRED IN EVERY SLEEPING ROOM AND
 OUTSIDE OF THE SLEEPING ROOMS AND IN ALL LEVELS OF THE
 DWELLING UNITS. THESE DETECTORS SHALL BE HARD WIRED AND
 SHALL BE INTERCONNECTED TO ONE ANOTHER OR AS PER THE
 APPLICABLE CODE..
  
 9. INTERIOR FINISH CLASSIFICATIONS FOR ALL WALLS AND
 CEILINGS SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED ON THE SUBMITTED
 BUILDING PERMIT PLAN.
  
 10. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA
 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE
 BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE
 BEING CONSTRUCTED.
  
 SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED,
 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
 PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
  
 FOR ANY PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE
 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?
  
 PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004,
 FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE
 POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF
 APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT,
 CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR
 AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER
 SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA)
 AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS
 PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS.
  
 11. A CLASS ?A? NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM
 SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR EACH STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP
 DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND
 APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY
 INSTALLATION.
  
 12. ALL VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL FIRE SEPARATIONS FOR
 THIS BUILDING SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND INDICATED
 ON THE PLANS.
  
 13. ALL FIRE RATED OPENING PROTECTIONS (FIRE DOORS AND
 HARDWARE) SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND INDICATED IN
 THE DOOR SCHEDULE. ALL DOORS THAT OPEN ONTO EXIT ACCESS
 CORRIDORS SHALL BE AT LEAST 20 MINUTE FIRE RATED AND BE
 EQUIPPED WITH SELF-CLOSING DEVICES THAT CAUSE THE DOOR
 TO POSITIVELY LATCH WHEN CLOSED. THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL
 BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND ILLUSTRATED ON THE DOOR
 SCHEDULE.
  
 14. PRESCRIPTIVE STRENGTH REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL
 HANDRAILS AND GUARDRAILS FOR THE BUILDING SHALL BE
 PROVIDED AND CLEARLY INDICATED ON THE PLANS.
  
 15. ALL EXIT DISCHARGE LOCATIONS SHALL BE CLEARLY
 ILLUSTRATED ON THE PLAN.
  
 16. ALL ILLUMINATED EXIT SIGNS AND EMERGENCY LIGHTING
 EQUIPMENT SHALL BE ILLUSTRATED ON THE PLAN.
  
 IF AN EMERGENCY POWER GENERATOR IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS
 (ARE) THE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?
  
 17. FLAME SPREAD DETAILS ON ALL FOAM BACKED STUCCO TRIM
 PLANNED FOR BUILDING SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR AND/OR
 IDENTIFIED AND INDICATED ON THE PLAN.
  
 18. ALL KITCHEN EQUIPMENT AND OPERATIONS SHALL COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 96, STANDARD FOR VENTILATION CONTROL AND FIRE
 PROTECTION OF COMMERCIAL COOKING OPERATIONS.
 EXTINGUISHMENT AND VENTILATION SYSTEM SHOP DRAWINGS
 SHALL BE SUBMITTED SEPARATELY FOR APPROVAL.
  
 19. HOW WILL THE ATRIUM ( THEATER LOBBY) BE PROTECTED
 INCLUDING SMOKE MIGRATION CONTROL?
  
 ANY PROPOSED SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH
 NFPA 101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE
 PROTECTION EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING:
  
 THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED,
 INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204,
 STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY
 RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR
 RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY
 HAVING JURISDICTION.
  
 THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE
 INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE
 APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED
 MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE
 SYSTEM.
  
 ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL
 INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.9.
  
 20. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 BUILDING.
  
 ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS,
 PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
 21. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7
 KEYWAY SYSTEM.
  
 ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S
 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA
 B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.
  
 ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN
 WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL
 LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET
 MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER
 ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN
 AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE
 IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.
  
 22. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
 EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
 PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER
 LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 OCCUPANT LOADS FOR ALL SPACES SHALL BE DETERMINED AND
 SUBMITTED WITH THE SUBMITTED PLAN AND WHEN APPROVED
 THEY ARE REQUIRED TO BE POSTED WHERE APPLICABLE.
  
 THE POOL DECK IS LARGE WITH TWO(2) EXITS INDICATED.
 PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE OCCUPANCY LOAD DOES NOT EXCEED
 THE CAPACITY OF THESE TWO EXIT AND THAT A THIRD EXIT IS
 NOT REQUIRED UNDER THE FFPC.
  
 23. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE
 BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND
 FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET
 OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER
 ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES.
  
 A FIRE HYDRANT IS REQUIRED TO BE WITHIN 100' OF AN FDC.
  
 ALL FIRE DEPARTMENT SPRINKLER SYSTEM CONNECTIONS
 (FDC,S) FOR THE PROJECT SHALL BE IDENTIFIED AND
 COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 24. GRILLS AND A FIRE PIT ARE INDICATED ON THE ROOF.
  
 CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL
 IS REQUIRED TO ENSURE THE INSTALLATION IS COMPLIANT
 WITH THE MANUFACTURES SPECIFICATIONS, PROTECTION OF THE
 PUBLIC, SEPARATED FORM COMBUSTIBLES(INCLUDING PLANTS)
 AND ARE WITHIN THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FIRE CODE.
  
 25. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 26. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  

Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 5 Status P Date 09-30-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 09-30-2020 Time 15:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 09-18-2020 Time 15:58 Sent To  
Notes
2020-09-30 15:57:12FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 2000 S DIXIE CAREFREE Z19050024
 SEPTEMBER 30, 2020
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN FOR THE
 SITE AND SHOW TREE CANOPY MITIGATION REQUIRED AND
 PROVIDED WITH THIS PETITION.
 ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING:
 ? SATISFIED. IDENTIFY TREE #5
 ? SATISFIED. REMOVE ERM REFERENCES FORM MULTIPLE
 LOCATIONS ON SHEET TD-1 AND REMOVE UNNECESSARY COLUMNS.
 ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COLUMNS ON THE
 DISPOSITION CHART: CANOPY DIAMETER, TREE CATEGORY, TREE
 CONDITION, AND SQUARE FOOTAGE MITIGATION DUE, AND
 PROVIDE THE INFORMATION FOR EACH TREE IN EACH COLUMN.
 ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION DUE TOTAL AT THE
 BOTTOM OF THE CHART.
 ? SATISFIED. ADJUST JAPANESE BLUEBERRY CANOPY CREDIT TO
 150 SQ FT FOR CATEGORY 2.
  
 2. SATISFIED. SUBMIT A LANDSCAPE PERMIT PLAN FOR 309
 BARCELONA MEETING THE MINIMUM CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR
 RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPING AND MITIGATING FOR TREES
 REMOVED.
 A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED FOR
 THE ADDITIONAL TREES REMOVED, AND THE PERMIT WAS ISSUED
 WITH CONDITIONS. MITIGATION IS DUE FOR ALL THE TREES
 REMOVED AND MUST BE ADDRESSED WITH REPLACEMENT OF TREES
 ON SITE OR PAYMENT IN LIEU. THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPE
 REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET ON SITE WITH A LANDSCAPE
 PERMIT PLAN TO BE SUBMITTED. NO MITIGATION HAS BEEN
 PROVIDED TO DATE FOR ANY TREES REMOVED FROM THE SITE.
  
 THIS IS THE FIRST REVIEW OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR 309
 BARCELONA. PER SECTION 94-448, ALL TREE REPLACEMENT
 MUST BE ON THE SUBJECT SITE TO BE COUNTED TOWARD
 MITIGATION DUE. THE 2 LIVE OAK TREES PROPOSED IN THE
 RIGHT OF WAY CANNOT BE COUNTED UNLESS THEY ARE WITHIN
 THE PROPERTY LINE, AS THIS PROPERTY IS SEPARATE FROM
 THE CPD.
  
 THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT TP19-1785 THAT REPLACED
 PERMIT TP 17-1618 EXPIRED ON APRIL 30, 2020.THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET LP-4 AND TREE DISPOSITION PLAN
 SHEET TD-2 MUST BE SUBMITTED UNDER LANDSCAPE PERMIT
 18030706 IN ORDER FOR THIS COMMENT TO BE SATISFIED.
  
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET LP-5 NEEDS BE SUBMITTED UNDER
 PERMIT 18030706.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE AMENITY
 DECKS IF INTENDED AS JUSTIFICATION FOR THE WAIVER
 REQUESTS.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM TO
 DEMONSTRATE THE AREAS PROVIDED AS OPEN SPACE AND
 LANDSCAPE AREAS ON SITE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LINES TO
 PROVIDE REFERENCE FOR THE WAIVER REQUESTS.
  
 5. SATISFIED. WAIVER REQUESTS #7 AND 8 NEED TO BE
 REVISED TO SHOW THAT 15% LANDSCAPE AREA IS REQUIRED PER
 THE CURRENT CODE.
 THERE IS AN ERROR ON THE CODE CHART THAT WILL BE
 CORRECTED. MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS AREA IS 85%, THEREFORE
 MINIMUM LANDSCAPE AREA IS 15%.
 THE SITE PLAN NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED TO 15% PROPOSED
 LANDSCAPE AREA IN THE SITE DATA CHART. THE PLAN OS-1
 COUNTS AREAS THAT ARE OVER THE PARKING GARAGE AS
 PERVIOUS AREA, WHICH THEY DO NOT QUALIFY AS PERVIOUS
 AREA. ADJUST THE PLAN AND THE NUMBERS IN THE WAIVER.
  
 6. SATISFIED. WAIVER REQUEST #9 NEEDS TO REFERENCE
 SECTION 94-443(A) BUFFERING OF NON-RESIDENTIAL USES
 ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY FOR THE EAST BUFFERS
 AND 94-443(D) ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS FOR
 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES FOR THE BUFFERS ADJACENT
 TO PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE 10 FEET
 IN WIDTH.
  
 7. SATISFIED. PROVIDE MEASUREMENTS AND CALCULATIONS FOR
 THE BUFFER TREES REQUIRED FOR ALL BUFFER LENGTHS PER
 SECTION 94-443 B. AND INDICATE HOW THIS WILL BE
 AFFECTED THROUGH THE WAIVER REQUESTS. INDICATE THE
 WIDTH OF ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS PROVIDED ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE STREET TREES THAT ARE NOT AFFECTED
 BY OVERHEAD UTILITIES NEED TO BE UPGRADED TO CATEGORY 1
 SHADE TREES IF USED AS A JUSTIFICATION FOR WAIVERS.
  
 WAIVER IS FOR WIDTH OF BUFFER PROVIDED, PROVIDE A
 REFERENCE OF THE NUMBER OF TREES THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED
 ALONG EACH BUFFER SEGMENT AND COMPARE TO THE NUMBER
 PROVIDED WITHIN EACH BUFFER AND ADJACENT RIGHT OF WAY.
 OAKS CANNOT BE USED ON DIXIE, AS THERE ARE OVERHEAD
 ELECTRIC LINES.
  
 LIVE OAKS ARE CATEGORY 1 TREES. PROVIDE THE REQUESTED
 INFORMATION ON REQUIRED, PROVIDED AND THE DIFFERENCE
 FOR THE NUMBER OF TREES AND THE AREA OF LANDSCAPING.
  
  
 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
  
 9. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO
 PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS
 INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS,
 AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE
 ROOTS.
 SOME ROOT BARRIERS ARE SHOWN, BUT THERE ARE SEVERAL
 SANITARY SEWER LINES SHOWN UNDER TREES ALONG DIXIE
 CONNECTING FROM THE SEWER MAIN TO THE BUILDING.
  
 10. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 EQUIPMENT INCLUDING FPL TRANSFORMERS, A/C UNITS, ETC.,
 AND PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT
 AND UTILITIES.
 LOCATIONS TO BE PROVIDED OR AREAS INDICATED ON THE PLAN
 TO ACCOMMODATE REQUIRED EQUIPMENT.
 GIVEN THE REQUEST FOR WAIVERS FOR LANDSCAPE AREA AND
 JUSTIFICATION PROVIDED, THESE AREAS NEED TO BE PLANNED
 FOR, AS SPACE IS LIMITED AND CANNOT BE CHANGED AFTER
 APPROVAL OF WAIVERS.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/30/19:
 11. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. ONCE TREE#5 IS CORRECTLY IDENTIFIED, AND THE
 CONDITION OF EACH TREE AND PALM ADDED, THE NUMBER OF
 TREES AND PALMS REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED CAN BE
 DETERMINED.
  
 12. SATISFIED. PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION FOR ALL LANDSCAPE
 WAIVERS.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/17/20:
 13. SATISFIED. TOTAL TREES REQUIRED OF 118 AS SHOWN ON
 SHEET LP-5 MUST HAVE THE PROVIDED TREE COUNT BROKEN
 DOWN INTO THE DIFFERENT AREAS. EACH PARCEL FOR ONSITE
 TREES, ROOFTOP AND RIGHT OF WAY TREES. THIS WILL
 PROVIDE AN EASILY REFERENCED CHART TO DEMONSTRATE WHERE
 THE TREES ARE PROVIDED.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  

Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 08-18-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 08-18-2020 Time 13:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 08-18-2020 Time 13:31 Sent To  
Notes
2020-08-18 13:31:42FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 2000 S DIXIE CAREFREE Z19050024
 AUGUST 17, 2020
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN FOR THE
 SITE AND SHOW TREE CANOPY MITIGATION REQUIRED AND
 PROVIDED WITH THIS PETITION.
 ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING:
 ? SATISFIED. IDENTIFY TREE #5
 ? SATISFIED. REMOVE ERM REFERENCES FORM MULTIPLE
 LOCATIONS ON SHEET TD-1 AND REMOVE UNNECESSARY COLUMNS.
 ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COLUMNS ON THE
 DISPOSITION CHART: CANOPY DIAMETER, TREE CATEGORY, TREE
 CONDITION, AND SQUARE FOOTAGE MITIGATION DUE, AND
 PROVIDE THE INFORMATION FOR EACH TREE IN EACH COLUMN.
 ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION DUE TOTAL AT THE
 BOTTOM OF THE CHART.
 ? SATISFIED. ADJUST JAPANESE BLUEBERRY CANOPY CREDIT TO
 150 SQ FT FOR CATEGORY 2.
  
 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SUBMIT A LANDSCAPE PERMIT PLAN
 FOR 309 BARCELONA MEETING THE MINIMUM CODE REQUIREMENTS
 FOR RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPING AND MITIGATING FOR TREES
 REMOVED.
 A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED FOR
 THE ADDITIONAL TREES REMOVED, AND THE PERMIT WAS ISSUED
 WITH CONDITIONS. MITIGATION IS DUE FOR ALL THE TREES
 REMOVED AND MUST BE ADDRESSED WITH REPLACEMENT OF TREES
 ON SITE OR PAYMENT IN LIEU. THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPE
 REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET ON SITE WITH A LANDSCAPE
 PERMIT PLAN TO BE SUBMITTED. NO MITIGATION HAS BEEN
 PROVIDED TO DATE FOR ANY TREES REMOVED FROM THE SITE.
  
 THIS IS THE FIRST REVIEW OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR 309
 BARCELONA. PER SECTION 94-448, ALL TREE REPLACEMENT
 MUST BE ON THE SUBJECT SITE TO BE COUNTED TOWARD
 MITIGATION DUE. THE 2 LIVE OAK TREES PROPOSED IN THE
 RIGHT OF WAY CANNOT BE COUNTED UNLESS THEY ARE WITHIN
 THE PROPERTY LINE, AS THIS PROPERTY IS SEPARATE FROM
 THE CPD.
  
 THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT TP19-1785 THAT REPLACED
 PERMIT TP 17-1618 EXPIRED ON APRIL 30, 2020.THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET LP-4 AND TREE DISPOSITION PLAN
 SHEET TD-2 MUST BE SUBMITTED UNDER LANDSCAPE PERMIT
 18030706 IN ORDER FOR THIS COMMENT TO BE SATISFIED.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE AMENITY
 DECKS IF INTENDED AS JUSTIFICATION FOR THE WAIVER
 REQUESTS.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM TO
 DEMONSTRATE THE AREAS PROVIDED AS OPEN SPACE AND
 LANDSCAPE AREAS ON SITE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LINES TO
 PROVIDE REFERENCE FOR THE WAIVER REQUESTS.
  
 5. SATISFIED. WAIVER REQUESTS #7 AND 8 NEED TO BE
 REVISED TO SHOW THAT 15% LANDSCAPE AREA IS REQUIRED PER
 THE CURRENT CODE.
 THERE IS AN ERROR ON THE CODE CHART THAT WILL BE
 CORRECTED. MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS AREA IS 85%, THEREFORE
 MINIMUM LANDSCAPE AREA IS 15%.
 THE SITE PLAN NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED TO 15% PROPOSED
 LANDSCAPE AREA IN THE SITE DATA CHART. THE PLAN OS-1
 COUNTS AREAS THAT ARE OVER THE PARKING GARAGE AS
 PERVIOUS AREA, WHICH THEY DO NOT QUALIFY AS PERVIOUS
 AREA. ADJUST THE PLAN AND THE NUMBERS IN THE WAIVER.
  
 6. SATISFIED. WAIVER REQUEST #9 NEEDS TO REFERENCE
 SECTION 94-443(A) BUFFERING OF NON-RESIDENTIAL USES
 ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY FOR THE EAST BUFFERS
 AND 94-443(D) ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS FOR
 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES FOR THE BUFFERS ADJACENT
 TO PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE 10 FEET
 IN WIDTH.
  
 7. SATISFIED. PROVIDE MEASUREMENTS AND CALCULATIONS FOR
 THE BUFFER TREES REQUIRED FOR ALL BUFFER LENGTHS PER
 SECTION 94-443 B. AND INDICATE HOW THIS WILL BE
 AFFECTED THROUGH THE WAIVER REQUESTS. INDICATE THE
 WIDTH OF ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS PROVIDED ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE STREET TREES THAT ARE NOT AFFECTED
 BY OVERHEAD UTILITIES NEED TO BE UPGRADED TO CATEGORY 1
 SHADE TREES IF USED AS A JUSTIFICATION FOR WAIVERS.
  
 WAIVER IS FOR WIDTH OF BUFFER PROVIDED, PROVIDE A
 REFERENCE OF THE NUMBER OF TREES THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED
 ALONG EACH BUFFER SEGMENT AND COMPARE TO THE NUMBER
 PROVIDED WITHIN EACH BUFFER AND ADJACENT RIGHT OF WAY.
 OAKS CANNOT BE USED ON DIXIE, AS THERE ARE OVERHEAD
 ELECTRIC LINES.
  
 LIVE OAKS ARE CATEGORY 1 TREES. PROVIDE THE REQUESTED
 INFORMATION ON REQUIRED, PROVIDED AND THE DIFFERENCE
 FOR THE NUMBER OF TREES AND THE AREA OF LANDSCAPING.
  
  
 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
  
 9. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO
 PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS
 INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS,
 AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE
 ROOTS.
 SOME ROOT BARRIERS ARE SHOWN, BUT THERE ARE SEVERAL
 SANITARY SEWER LINES SHOWN UNDER TREES ALONG DIXIE
 CONNECTING FROM THE SEWER MAIN TO THE BUILDING.
  
 10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL GROUND
 MOUNTED EQUIPMENT INCLUDING FPL TRANSFORMERS, A/C
 UNITS, ETC., AND PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND
 MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES.
 LOCATIONS TO BE PROVIDED OR AREAS INDICATED ON THE PLAN
 TO ACCOMMODATE REQUIRED EQUIPMENT.
 GIVEN THE REQUEST FOR WAIVERS FOR LANDSCAPE AREA AND
 JUSTIFICATION PROVIDED, THESE AREAS NEED TO BE PLANNED
 FOR, AS SPACE IS LIMITED AND CANNOT BE CHANGED AFTER
 APPROVAL OF WAIVERS.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/30/19:
 11. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. ONCE TREE#5 IS CORRECTLY IDENTIFIED, AND THE
 CONDITION OF EACH TREE AND PALM ADDED, THE NUMBER OF
 TREES AND PALMS REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED CAN BE
 DETERMINED.
  
 12. SATISFIED. PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION FOR ALL LANDSCAPE
 WAIVERS.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/17/20:
 13. TOTAL TREES REQUIRED OF 118 AS SHOWN ON SHEET LP-5
 MUST HAVE THE PROVIDED TREE COUNT BROKEN DOWN INTO THE
 DIFFERENT AREAS. EACH PARCEL FOR ONSITE TREES, ROOFTOP
 AND RIGHT OF WAY TREES. THIS WILL PROVIDE AN EASILY
 REFERENCED CHART TO DEMONSTRATE WHERE THE TREES ARE
 PROVIDED.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  

Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 01-21-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 01-21-2020 Time 09:08 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 01-21-2020 Time 09:08 Sent To  
Notes
2020-01-21 09:09:18FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 2000 S DIXIE CAREFREE Z19050024
 JANUARY 17, 2020
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN FOR THE
 SITE AND SHOW TREE CANOPY MITIGATION REQUIRED AND
 PROVIDED WITH THIS PETITION.
 ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING:
 ? SATISFIED. IDENTIFY TREE #5
 ? SATISFIED. REMOVE ERM REFERENCES FORM MULTIPLE
 LOCATIONS ON SHEET TD-1 AND REMOVE UNNECESSARY COLUMNS.
 ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COLUMNS ON THE
 DISPOSITION CHART: CANOPY DIAMETER, TREE CATEGORY, TREE
 CONDITION, AND SQUARE FOOTAGE MITIGATION DUE, AND
 PROVIDE THE INFORMATION FOR EACH TREE IN EACH COLUMN.
 ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION DUE TOTAL AT THE
 BOTTOM OF THE CHART.
 ? SATISFIED. ADJUST JAPANESE BLUEBERRY CANOPY CREDIT TO
 150 SQ FT FOR CATEGORY 2.
  
 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SUBMIT A LANDSCAPE PERMIT PLAN
 FOR 309 BARCELONA MEETING THE MINIMUM CODE REQUIREMENTS
 FOR RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPING AND MITIGATING FOR TREES
 REMOVED.
 A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED FOR
 THE ADDITIONAL TREES REMOVED, AND THE PERMIT WAS ISSUED
 WITH CONDITIONS. MITIGATION IS DUE FOR ALL THE TREES
 REMOVED AND MUST BE ADDRESSED WITH REPLACEMENT OF TREES
 ON SITE OR PAYMENT IN LIEU. THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPE
 REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET ON SITE WITH A LANDSCAPE
 PERMIT PLAN TO BE SUBMITTED. NO MITIGATION HAS BEEN
 PROVIDED TO DATE FOR ANY TREES REMOVED FROM THE SITE.
  
 THIS IS THE FIRST REVIEW OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR 309
 BARCELONA. PER SECTION 94-448, ALL TREE REPLACEMENT
 MUST BE ON THE SUBJECT SITE TO BE COUNTED TOWARD
 MITIGATION DUE. THE 2 LIVE OAK TREES PROPOSED IN THE
 RIGHT OF WAY CANNOT BE COUNTED UNLESS THEY ARE WITHIN
 THE PROPERTY LINE, AS THIS PROPERTY IS SEPARATE FROM
 THE CPD.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE AMENITY
 DECKS IF INTENDED AS JUSTIFICATION FOR THE WAIVER
 REQUESTS.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM TO
 DEMONSTRATE THE AREAS PROVIDED AS OPEN SPACE AND
 LANDSCAPE AREAS ON SITE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LINES TO
 PROVIDE REFERENCE FOR THE WAIVER REQUESTS.
  
 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. WAIVER REQUESTS #7 AND 8 NEED
 TO BE REVISED TO SHOW THAT 15% LANDSCAPE AREA IS
 REQUIRED PER THE CURRENT CODE.
 THERE IS AN ERROR ON THE CODE CHART THAT WILL BE
 CORRECTED. MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS AREA IS 85%, THEREFORE
 MINIMUM LANDSCAPE AREA IS 15%.
 THE SITE PLAN NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED TO 15% PROPOSED
 LANDSCAPE AREA IN THE SITE DATA CHART. THE PLAN OS-1
 COUNTS AREAS THAT ARE OVER THE PARKING GARAGE AS
 PERVIOUS AREA, WHICH THEY DO NOT QUALIFY AS PERVIOUS
 AREA. ADJUST THE PLAN AND THE NUMBERS IN THE WAIVER.
  
 6. SATISFIED. WAIVER REQUEST #9 NEEDS TO REFERENCE
 SECTION 94-443(A) BUFFERING OF NON-RESIDENTIAL USES
 ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY FOR THE EAST BUFFERS
 AND 94-443(D) ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS FOR
 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES FOR THE BUFFERS ADJACENT
 TO PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE 10 FEET
 IN WIDTH.
  
 7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE MEASUREMENTS AND
 CALCULATIONS FOR THE BUFFER TREES REQUIRED FOR ALL
 BUFFER LENGTHS PER SECTION 94-443 B. AND INDICATE HOW
 THIS WILL BE AFFECTED THROUGH THE WAIVER REQUESTS.
 INDICATE THE WIDTH OF ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS PROVIDED ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE STREET TREES THAT ARE NOT
 AFFECTED BY OVERHEAD UTILITIES NEED TO BE UPGRADED TO
 CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES IF USED AS A JUSTIFICATION FOR
 WAIVERS.
  
 WAIVER IS FOR WIDTH OF BUFFER PROVIDED, PROVIDE A
 REFERENCE OF THE NUMBER OF TREES THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED
 ALONG EACH BUFFER SEGMENT AND COMPARE TO THE NUMBER
 PROVIDED WITHIN EACH BUFFER AND ADJACENT RIGHT OF WAY.
 OAKS CANNOT BE USED ON DIXIE, AS THERE ARE OVERHEAD
 ELECTRIC LINES.
  
 LIVE OAKS ARE CATEGORY 1 TREES. PROVIDE THE REQUESTED
 INFORMATION ON REQUIRED, PROVIDED AND THE DIFFERENCE
 FOR THE NUMBER OF TREES AND THE AREA OF LANDSCAPING.
  
  
 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
  
 9. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS
 TO PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS.
 THIS INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND
 CURBS, AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED
 BY TREE ROOTS.
 SOME ROOT BARRIERS ARE SHOWN, BUT THERE ARE SEVERAL
 SANITARY SEWER LINES SHOWN UNDER TREES ALONG DIXIE
 CONNECTING FROM THE SEWER MAIN TO THE BUILDING.
  
 10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL GROUND
 MOUNTED EQUIPMENT INCLUDING FPL TRANSFORMERS, A/C
 UNITS, ETC., AND PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND
 MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES.
 LOCATIONS TO BE PROVIDED OR AREAS INDICATED ON THE PLAN
 TO ACCOMMODATE REQUIRED EQUIPMENT.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/30/19:
 11. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR
 RELOCATED. ONCE TREE#5 IS CORRECTLY IDENTIFIED, AND THE
 CONDITION OF EACH TREE AND PALM ADDED, THE NUMBER OF
 TREES AND PALMS REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED CAN BE
 DETERMINED.
  
 12. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION FOR ALL
 LANDSCAPE WAIVERS.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  

Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-30-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 10-30-2019 Time 16:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 10-30-2019 Time 16:35 Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-30 16:35:30FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 2000 S DIXIE CAREFREE Z19050024
 OCTOBER 30, 2019
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN
 FOR THE SITE AND SHOW TREE CANOPY MITIGATION REQUIRED
 AND PROVIDED WITH THIS PETITION.
 ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING:
 ? IDENTIFY TREE #5
 ? REMOVE ERM REFERENCES FORM MULTIPLE LOCATIONS ON
 SHEET TD-1 AND REMOVE UNNECESSARY COLUMNS.
 ? PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COLUMNS ON THE DISPOSITION
 CHART: CANOPY DIAMETER, TREE CATEGORY, TREE CONDITION,
 AND SQUARE FOOTAGE MITIGATION DUE, AND PROVIDE THE
 INFORMATION FOR EACH TREE IN EACH COLUMN.
 ? PROVIDE THE MITIGATION DUE TOTAL AT THE BOTTOM OF THE
 CHART.
 ? ADJUST JAPANESE BLUEBERRY CANOPY CREDIT TO 150 SQ FT
 FOR CATEGORY 2.
  
 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SUBMIT A LANDSCAPE PERMIT PLAN
 FOR 309 BARCELONA MEETING THE MINIMUM CODE REQUIREMENTS
 FOR RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPING AND MITIGATING FOR TREES
 REMOVED.
 A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED FOR
 THE ADDITIONAL TREES REMOVED, AND THE PERMIT WAS ISSUED
 WITH CONDITIONS. MITIGATION IS DUE FOR ALL THE TREES
 REMOVED AND MUST BE ADDRESSED WITH REPLACEMENT OF TREES
 ON SITE OR PAYMENT IN LIEU. THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPE
 REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET ON SITE WITH A LANDSCAPE
 PERMIT PLAN TO BE SUBMITTED. NO MITIGATION HAS BEEN
 PROVIDED TO DATE FOR ANY TREES REMOVED FROM THE SITE.
  
 3. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE
 AMENITY DECKS IF INTENDED AS JUSTIFICATION FOR THE
 WAIVER REQUESTS.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM TO
 DEMONSTRATE THE AREAS PROVIDED AS OPEN SPACE AND
 LANDSCAPE AREAS ON SITE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LINES TO
 PROVIDE REFERENCE FOR THE WAIVER REQUESTS.
  
 5. NOT SATISFIED. WAIVER REQUESTS #7 AND 8 NEED TO BE
 REVISED TO SHOW THAT 15% LANDSCAPE AREA IS REQUIRED PER
 THE CURRENT CODE.
 THERE IS AN ERROR ON THE CODE CHART THAT WILL BE
 CORRECTED. MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS AREA IS 85%, THEREFORE
 MINIMUM LANDSCAPE AREA IS 15%.
  
 6. SATISFIED. WAIVER REQUEST #9 NEEDS TO REFERENCE
 SECTION 94-443(A) BUFFERING OF NON-RESIDENTIAL USES
 ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY FOR THE EAST BUFFERS
 AND 94-443(D) ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS FOR
 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES FOR THE BUFFERS ADJACENT
 TO PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE 10 FEET
 IN WIDTH.
  
 7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE MEASUREMENTS AND
 CALCULATIONS FOR THE BUFFER TREES REQUIRED FOR ALL
 BUFFER LENGTHS PER SECTION 94-443 B. AND INDICATE HOW
 THIS WILL BE AFFECTED THROUGH THE WAIVER REQUESTS.
 INDICATE THE WIDTH OF ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS PROVIDED ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE STREET TREES THAT ARE NOT
 AFFECTED BY OVERHEAD UTILITIES NEED TO BE UPGRADED TO
 CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES IF USED AS A JUSTIFICATION FOR
 WAIVERS.
  
 WAIVER IS FOR WIDTH OF BUFFER PROVIDED, PROVIDE A
 REFERENCE OF THE NUMBER OF TREES THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED
 ALONG EACH BUFFER SEGMENT AND COMPARE TO THE NUMBER
 PROVIDED WITHIN EACH BUFFER AND ADJACENT RIGHT OF WAY.
 OAKS CANNOT BE USED ON DIXIE, AS THERE ARE OVERHEAD
 ELECTRIC LINES.
  
  
 8. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
  
 9. NOT SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO
 PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS
 INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS,
 AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE
 ROOTS.
  
 10. NOT SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 EQUIPMENT INCLUDING FPL TRANSFORMERS, A/C UNITS, ETC.,
 AND PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT
 AND UTILITIES.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/30/19:
 11. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES IN GOOD
 CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. ONCE
 TREE#5 IS CORRECTLY IDENTIFIED, AND THE CONDITION OF
 EACH TREE AND PALM ADDED, THE NUMBER OF TREES AND PALMS
 REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED CAN BE DETERMINED.
  
 12. PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION FOR ALL LANDSCAPE WAIVERS.
  
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  

Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-10-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 06-10-2019 Time 17:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 06-10-2019 Time 17:37 Sent To  
Notes
2019-06-10 17:38:29FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 2000 S DIXIE CAREFREE Z19050024
 JUNE 10, 2019
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
 1. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN FOR THE SITE, AND
 SHOW TREE CANOPY MITIGATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED WITH
 THIS PETITION.
  
 2. SUBMIT A LANDSCAPE PERMIT PLAN FOR 309 BARCELONA
 MEETING THE MINIMUM CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL
 LANDSCAPING AND MITIGATING FOR TREES REMOVED.
  
 3. PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE AMENITY DECKS IF
 INTENDED AS JUSTIFICATION FOR THE WAIVER REQUESTS.
  
 4. PROVIDE AN OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM TO DEMONSTRATE THE
 AREAS PROVIDED AS OPEN SPACE AND LANDSCAPE AREAS ON
 SITE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LINES TO PROVIDE REFERENCE FOR
 THE WAIVER REQUESTS.
  
 5. WAIVER REQUESTS #7 AND 8 NEED TO BE REVISED TO SHOW
 THAT 15% LANDSCAPE AREA IS REQUIRED PER THE CURRENT
 CODE.
  
 6. WAIVER REQUEST #9 NEEDS TO REFERENCE SECTION
 94-443(A) BUFFERING OF NON-RESIDENTIAL USES ADJACENT TO
 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY FOR THE EAST BUFFERS AND 94-443(D)
 ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS FOR MULTIFAMILY
 RESIDENTIAL USES FOR THE BUFFERS ADJACENT TO PUBLIC
 THOROUGHFARES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE 10 FEET IN WIDTH.
  
 7. PROVIDE MEASUREMENTS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE
 BUFFER TREES REQUIRED FOR ALL BUFFER LENGTHS PER
 SECTION 94-443 B. AND INDICATE HOW THIS WILL BE
 AFFECTED THROUGH THE WAIVER REQUESTS. INDICATE THE
 WIDTH OF ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS PROVIDED ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE STREET TREES THAT ARE NOT AFFECTED
 BY OVERHEAD UTILITIES NEED TO BE UPGRADED TO CATEGORY 1
 SHADE TREES IF USED AS A JUSTIFICATION FOR WAIVERS.
  
  
 8. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN
 TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
  
 9. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT
 INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES
 WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY
 FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS.
  
 10. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT
 INCLUDING FPL TRANSFORMERS, A/C UNITS, ETC., AND
 PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND
 UTILITIES.
  
 11. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN
 TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING.
  
 12. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT
 INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES
 WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY
 FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS.
  
 13. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT
 INCLUDING FPL TRANSFORMERS, A/C UNITS, ETC., AND
 PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND
 UTILITIES.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A
 SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
  

Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 2 Status P Date 10-15-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 10-15-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 10-15-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-15 13:05:58NO FURTHER COMMENTS FROM DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS.

Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 06-11-2019 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 06-11-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-06-11 12:11:40PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS:
 - LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID
 WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE OF THE
 COMPACTOR THAT WILL BE UTILIZED.
 - DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEMS PICK UP
  
  
 MATT HEJAZI
 DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
 [email protected]
 561-822-2045

Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 6 Status P Date 10-05-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 10-05-2020 Time 12:03 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 10-05-2020 Time 12:20 Sent To  
Notes
2020-10-05 12:20:35THE FOLLOWING COMENTS FROM THE STORMWATER STOP#5 WERE
 ADDRESSED THROUGH EMAILS. COMMENT #3 WILL BECOME A
 CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
  
 1. WHERE DOES STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM TANDEM PARKING
 SPACES DRAIN TO? THE EOR SUBMITTED A ROUGH SKETCH
 SKETCH SHOWING HOW THE MEP MAY DESIGN A STORMWAER
 COLLECTION SYSTEM TO ROUTE THE STORMWATER RUNOFF TO THE
 STORMCEPTER STRUCTURE. THE ACTUAL DESIGN WILL NEED TO
 BE SUBMITTED WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
  
 3.THE BACK OF SIDEWALK FOR THE DRIVEWWAYS TO BARCELONA
 ROAD AND TO CORDOVA ROAD SHALL BE THE HIGH POINT AND
 THE PAVEMENT BEHIND THE SIDEWALK SLOPED TO DRAIN TO THE
 INTERIOR OF THE SITE. NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION HAS BEEN
 PROVIDED TO ADDRESS THIS COMMENT. THE PARKING GARAGE
 PLANS APPEAR TO TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION AREAS FOR
 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BUT THESE AREAS MAY NEED BE BE
 ENLARGED TOWARD THE SOUTH IF THE CURRENT FOOTPRINT
 CANNOT ACCOMMODATE THE PLACEMENT OF THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM
 TO BE LOWER THAN THE BACK OIF SIDEWALK. A CONDITION OF
 THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL SHALL BE THE BACK OF SIDEWALK BE
 AT LEAST 0.1 FEET HIGHER THAN THE INTERIIOR DRIVEWAY
 GRADES.
  
 4. WHERE DOES AREA EAST OF THE SOUTH BUILDING DRAIN TO?
 THE EOR SUBMITTED A ROUGH SKETCH SKETCH SHOWING HOW THE
 MEP MAY DESIGN A STORMWAER COLLECTION SYSTEM TO ROUTE
 THE STORMWATER RUNOFF TO THE STORMCEPTER STRUCTURE. THE
 ACTUAL DESIGN WILL NEED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH THE
 ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  

Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 5 Status F Date 09-25-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 09-25-2020 Time 16:29 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 09-25-2020 Time 16:50 Sent To  
Notes
2020-09-25 16:50:09THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 9/11/2020 SUBMITTAL SET OF PLANS.
  
 1. WHERE DOES STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM TANDEM PARKING
 SPACES DRAIN TO? [NOT SATISFIED] THE RESPONSE TO THIS
 COMMENT DISCUSSED THE ONSTREET PARALLEL PARKING SPACES.
 THIS COMMENT IS REFERRING TO THE EAST SIDE OF THE
 PROPOSED BUIDLING BETWEEN FLAMINGO DRIVE AND BARCELONA
 ROAD, WHERE THERE ARE TRAVEL LANES IN BOTH DIRECTIONS
 SEPARATED BY A BI-DIRECTIONAL TRAVEL LANE. IF DRAINAGE
 SYSTEM WILL BE ON THE MEP PLANS, THEN FOR THE
 CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN, SHOW INLET AND PIPING WITH
 A NOTEE THAT FINAL DESIGN WILL BE ON THE MEP PLANS.
  
 2. THE BACK OF WALK FOR THE EAST DRIVEWAY TO FLAMINGO
 DRIVE SHALL BE THE HIGH POINT FOR THE DRIVEWAY SOUTH OF
 THE SIDEWALK.[SATISFIED]
  
 3.THE BACK OF SIDEWALK FOR THE DRIVEWWAYS TO BARCELONA
 ROAD AND TO CORDOVA ROAD SHALL BE THE HIGH POINT AND
 THE PAVEMENT BEHIND THE SIDEWALK SLOPED TO DRAIN TO THE
 INTERIOR OF THE SITE.[PARTIALLY SATISFIED] THE LOADING
 AREA SOUTH OF BARCELONA ROAD SHALL HAVE A LOW SPOT
 SOUTH OF THE SIDEWALK. MOVE CASCADE SEPARATOR SOUTH AND
 SHOW FLOW ARROW.
  
 4. WHERE DOES AREA EAST OF THE SOUTH BUILDING DRAIN TO?
 [REPEAT COMMENT] RESPONSE STATED DESIGN WILL BE SHOWN
 ON MEP PLANS. SHOW FLOW ARROW FOR RAMP. SINCE THIS IS
 CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN, SHOW GRATE AND POSSIBLE
 PIPING TO THE CASCADE SEPARATOR. IF MEP WILL BE
 PROVIDING THE FINAL DESIGN, THEN A NOTE CAN BE ADDED TO
 THE PLAN INDICATING THIS.
  
 5. CURB RAMPS ON THE NE CORNER OF FLAMINGO ROAD/S.
 DIXIE HWY AND THE SE CORNER OF CORDOVA ROAD/S. DIXIE
 HWY TO BE RECONSTRUCTED TO MEET CURRENT ADA
 CRITERIA.[SATISFIED]
  
 6. CONFIRM WITH FDOT THE MILL AND OVERLAY LIMITS ON S.
 DIXIE HWY.[SATISFIED]
  
 7. SHOW DRIVEWAY FOR 327 CORDOVA DRIVE AND THE STREET
 LIGHT TO THE WEST OF THE DRIVEWAY. [SATISFIED]
  
 8. SHOW LOCATION OF EXISTING LIGHTPOLES ON FLAMINGO
 DRIVE. [SATISFIED]
  
 9. STORMWATER DESIGN FOR FLAMINGO DRIVE AND BARCELONA
 ROAD TO INCLUDE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF RIGHT OF WAY
 BATWEEN S. DIXIE HWY AND S. OLIVE AVE., SHOW ALL
 EXISTING UTILITIES IN THE RIGHT OF WAY AND
 HORIZONTAL/VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN STORM PIPE AND
 EXISTING UTILITIES. THIS CAN BE PROVIDED WITH
 ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.[SATISFIED] RESPONSE AND
 COMMENT INDICATED THIS COMMENT CAN BE ADDRESSED DURING
 ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
  

Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 4 Status F Date 08-25-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 08-25-2020 Time 01:51 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 08-25-2020 Time 02:52 Sent To  
Notes
2020-08-25 02:51:05THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 8/5/2020 SUBMITTAL SET OF PLANS.
  
 1. WHERE DOES STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM TANDEM PARKING
 SPACES DRAIN TO?
  
 2. THE BACK OF WALK FOR THE EAST DRIVEWAY TO FLAMINGO
 DRIVE SHALL BE THE HIGH POINT FOR THE DRIVEWAY SOUTH OF
 THE SIDEWALK.
  
 3.THE BACK OF SIDEWALK FOR THE DRIVEWWAYS TO BARCELONA
 ROAD AND TO CORDOVA ROAD SHALL BE THE HIGH POINT AND
 THE PAVEMENT BEHIND THE SIDEWALK SLOPED TO DRAIN TO THE
 INTERIOR OF THE SITE.
  
 4. WHERE DOES AREA EAST OF THE SOUTH BUILDING DRAIN TO?
  
 5. CURB RAMPS ON THE NE CORNER OF FLAMINGO ROAD/S.
 DIXIE HWY AND THE SE CORNER OF CORDOVA ROAD/S. DIXIE
 HWY TO BE RECONSTRUCTED TO MEET CURRENT ADA CRITERIA.
  
 6. CONFIRM WITH FDOT THE MILL AND OVERLAY LIMITS ON S.
 DIXIE HWY.
  
 7. SHOW DRIVEWAY FOR 327 CORDOVA DRIVE AND THE STREET
 LIGHT TO THE WEST OF THE DRIVEWAY.
  
 8. SHOW LOCATION OF EXISTING LIGHTPOLES ON FLAMINGO
 DRIVE.
  
 9. STORMWATER DESIGN FOR FLAMINGO DRIVE AND BARCELONA
 ROAD TO INCLUDE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF RIGHT OF WAY
 BATWEEN S. DIXIE HWY AND S. OLIVE AVE., SHOW ALL
 EXISTING UTILITIES IN THE RIGHT OF WAY AND
 HORIZONTAL/VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN STORM PIPE AND
 EXISTING UTILITIES. THIS CAN BE PROVIDED WITH
 ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
  

Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 3 Status F Date 01-13-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 01-13-2020 Time 09:18 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 01-13-2020 Time 09:47 Sent To  
Notes
2020-01-13 09:39:44THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 DECEMBER 31, 2019 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE:
  
 1. MINIMUM STORMWATER PIPE SIZE IN THE RIGHT OF WAY IS
 15" RCP. THE FLAMINGO DRIVE STORMWATER EXTENSION WILL
 NEED TO REPLACE THE EXISTING 12" PIPE ON THE WEST SIDE
 OF OLIVE AVE.
  
 2. THE STORMWATER SYSTEMN EXTENSION PROPOSED ON
 BARCELONA ROAD WILL AFFECT THE EXISTING LANDSCAPED
 BULBOUT ON THE STREET.
  
 3. THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM EXTENSIONS IN THE RIGHT OF WAY
 WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED ON A SEPARATE SET OF PLANS AND
 APPROVED BY THE PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT OR
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. BASE SHEETS SHALL
 INCLUDE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY INFORMATION.
  
 4. ONSITE STOMWATER RUNOFF TO BE CAPTURED AND ROUTED
 THROUGH THE ONSITE STORMWATER RMANAGEMENT SYSTEM. STAFF
 COULD NOT DETERMINE HOW THE RUNOFF FROM THE DRIVEWAYS
 WILL BE CAPTURED BEFORE LEAVING THE SITE.
  
 5. ROOF DOWNSPOUTS TO BE DIRECTED TO THE ONSITE
 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.
  
 6. SIDEWALKS ACROSS THE DRIVEWAYS TO BE CONSTRUCTED OF
 CONCRETE.
  
 7. REVISE THE ADA MAT FOR THE CURB RAMP ON THE EAST
 SIDE OF THE MAIN DRIVEWAY TO FLAMINGO ROAD TO FOLLOW
 THE CURB LINE.
  
 TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 [email protected]
 561-494-1120

Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-09-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 10-09-2019 Time 15:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 10-09-2019 Time 15:43 Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-09 15:43:19THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 OCTOBER 9, 2019 REVIEW SUBMITTAL PACKAGE:
  
 1. IT APPEARS THE PROPOSED BUMPOUTS IN THE PARKING
 SPACES ON S. DIXIE HIGHWAY WILL BLOCK THE DRAINAGE FLOW
 IN THE GUTTER.
  
 2. STAFF CANNOT DISCERN HOW THE STORMWATER RUNOFF IS
 BEING CONVEYED TO THE PROPOSED CASCADE SEPARATORS FOR
 WATER QUALITY TREATMENT..
  
 3. SHOW WHERE THE ROOF DOWNSPOUTS WILL BE LOCATED AND
 HOW THAT FLOW WILL BE CONNECTED TO THE ONSITE
 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.
  
 4. LABEL MINIMUM 6 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION
 BETWEEN OUTSIDE WALLS OF WATER MAINS, STORMWATER MAINS
 AND SEWER MAINS.
  
 5. SHOW MILL AND RESURFACE LIMITS FOR THE TRENCH CUTS
 ON S. DIXIE HWY.
  
 6. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM THE ROAD CENTERLINE TO
 FACE OF BUILDING OF EACH ON-STREET PARKING AREA TO SHOW
 PAVEMENT AND SIDEWALK WIDTHS/SLOPES. SHWO THE LOCATION
 OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE ON EACH CROSS SECTION.
  
 7. REVISED SURVEY NOT INCLUDED IN THE REVIEW PACKAGE.
  
 8. PROVIDE CORRESPONDENCE FROM FDOT THAT THEY HAVE NO
 OBJECTIONS TO THE STOMRWATER SYSTEM CONNECTING TO THE
 S. DIXIE HWY DRAINAGE SYSTEM.
  
 9. CURB RAMPS WILL HAVE TO BE RECONSTRUCTED TO CURRENT
 ADA REQUIREMENTS (INCLUDED THE TRUNCATED DOMES) IF THE
 ASPHALT ADJACENT TO THE CURB RAMP IS
 DISTURBED/MODIFIED. THIS WILL APPLY TO THE NE CORNER OF
 FLAMINGO DRIVE AND SE CORNER OF CORDOVA ROAD.
  
 TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 [email protected]
 561-494-1120

Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-10-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 06-10-2019 Time 18:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 06-10-2019 Time 18:50 Sent To  
Notes
2019-06-10 18:50:23THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL:
 THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 SITE PLAN APPROVAL:
  
 1. A NOTE ON THE CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN STATES
 ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE RELATIVE TO THE NGVD 1929 VERTICAL
 DATUM BASED ON A SURVEY PREPARED BY WALLACE SURVEYING,
 CORP. THE BOUNDARY SURVEY (DATE OF LAST FIELD SURVEY
 2/28/2019) BY WALLACE SURVEYING NOTES THE ELEVATIONS ON
 THE SURVEY (NONE FOUND) ARE BASED ON NAVD1988. THE
 CITY?S VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD 1929. THE CITY HAS
 ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD 1988 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION
 EQUATION TO NGVD 1929 IS PROVIDED ON THE SHEET(S). LIST
 THE CONVERSION EQUATION ON THE SURVEY AND CONFIRM THE
 VERTICAL DATUM ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN.
  
 2. LOWEST LEVEL OF THE PARKING GARAGES WILL BE 22 FEET
 BELOW FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION. WHAT IS THE SEASONAL
 HIGH WATER TABLE ELEVATION FOR THE SITE AND HOW WILL
 GROUNDWATER TO BE CONTROLLED AROUND THE UNDERGROUND
 PARKING STRUCTURES?
  
 3. HOW WILL ANY STORMWATER RUNOFF ENTERING THE GARAGES
 BE MANAGED?
  
 4. IT APPEARS THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT (SWM) SYSTEM
 CONSISTS OF BUBBLE-UP INLETS OUT INTO THE ROAD. THE SWM
 SYSTEM SHOULD CONNECT INTO THE NEAREST DRAINAGE SYSTEM
 (CORDOVA ROAD AND/OR S. DIXIE HIGHWAY) AND/OR INCLUDE
 EXTENDING THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM ON FLAMINGO DRIVE TO THE
 PROJECT.
  
 5. THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IS TO BE DESIGNED
 TO MEET SFWMD CRITERIA INCLUDING WATER QUALITY
 TREATMENT AND PEAK FLOW ATTENUATION.
  
 6. THE EXFILTRATION TRENCHES ARE PROPOSED ADJACENT TO
 THE WALLS OF THE UNDERGROUND PARKING STRUCTURE. THE
 STANDARD EXFILTRATION EQUATION DOES NOT APPLY IN THIS
 SITUATION.
  
 7. INDICATE MILLING AND RESURFACING LIMITS AROUND
 TRENCH CUTS ON CITY STREETS.
  
 8. SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
 THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS
 CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE
 ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS
  
 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED
 WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP PRIOR TO STARTING
 CONSTRUCTION.
  
 4. S. DIXIE HIGHWAY IS MAINTAINED BY THE FLORIDA
 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. PERMITS WILL BE NEEDED
 FROM FDOT.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  

Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 08-21-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 08-21-2020 Time 10:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-08-21 10:51:12PASSED WITH CONDITIONS:
  
 1. REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED.
 2. APPROVED ENGINEERING PLANS REQUIRED PRIOR TO
 BUILDING PERMIT.

Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 01-29-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 01-29-2020 Time 09:03 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-01-29 09:08:28PREVIOUS COMMENTS NOT ADDRESSED. CCTV IS STILL REQUIRED
 ALONG WITH THE OTHER ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS IN THE
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES APPLICATION.

Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 11-06-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 11-06-2019 Time 07:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-11-06 07:19:331. SITE PLAN APPROVAL WILL NOT BE GRANTED UNTIL ALL
 REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION, SECTION J
 AND ENGINEERING CHECKLIST ON PAGE 17 ARE MET.

Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-07-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 06-07-2019 Time 13:02 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-06-07 13:34:041. RE-PLAT WILL BE REQUIRED. ANY UNDERLYING EASEMENTS
 WILL NEED TO BE ABANDONED/RELOCATED.
 2. MMOA WITH THE FDOT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR DIXIE HWY.
 IMPROVEMENTS/LANDSCAPING. A DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT WILL
 BE REQUIRED TO ASSUME THE MMOA AND FOR THE THREE SIDE
 STREETS.
 3. DETAIL OF AREA WITH PROPOSED BACK-FLOWS SHOWING ALL
 IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED.
 4. ENGINEERING PLANS DO NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF
 THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. FURTHER REVIEW WILL BE
 REQUIRED UPON RECEIPT OF REQUIRED INFORMATION.

Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 08-14-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 08-14-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 07-27-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-08-14 16:31:10PASSED, WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL.
 CONDITIONS
 1. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONDUCT PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
 STUDIES FOR ENHANCED MARKED CROSSWALK ACROSS DIXIE
 HIGHWAY AT BARCELONA ROAD AND CORDOVA ROAD ONE YEAR AND
 TWO YEARS AFTER THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE MET, AND
 CONSTRUCT THE ENHANCED AND MARKED PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS
 WHEN WARRANTED AND APPROVED BY FDOT:
 O CO IS ISSUED FOR AT LEAST 50% OF THE PROPOSED MOVIE
 THEATRE OR RESIDENTIAL UNITS.
 O THE LAST CO IS ISSUED FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
 2. THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING STUDIES SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE LATEST REQUIREMENTS FROM FDOT. THE NECESSARY
 TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN DATA SHALL BE COLLECTED BY THE
 DEVELOPER FOR THE ANALYSES.
 3. PROVIDE SURETY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE ENHANCED
 MARKED CROSSWALK UNTIL THE OBLIGATIONS RELATED TO
 PEDESTRIAN CROSSING STUDIES OR PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK
 CONSTRUCTION (#1 AND #2 ABOVE) ARE FULLY MET.
 4. COORDINATE WITH CITY ON PROVIDING SIDEWALK EASEMENT
 FOR THE PORTION OF SIDEWALK WITHIN THE PROPERTY DURING
 PERMITTING.
 5. THE DEVELOPER SHALL COORDINATE WITH FDOT AND CITY OF
 WEST PALM BEACH ON THE DIXIE HIGHWAY LANE ELIMINATION
 PROJECT ALONG THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE UNTIL THE
 CONSTRUCTION OF THE LANE ELIMINATION PROJECT IS
 COMPLETED. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONSTRUCT BUS SHELTER
 AND LANDSCAPE AT LOCATIONS NOT IN CONFLICT WITH THE
 PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE SHARED USED PATH, OR BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR RELOCATION IF SUCH CONFLICTS OCCUR.
 6. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONTRIBUTE FUNDS TO THE FUTURE
 TRANSIT OPERATIONS. THE ANNUAL CONTRIBUTION SHALL BE
 CALCULATED AS THE NUMBER OF PROPOSED PARKING SPACES
 MINUS THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED PARKING SPACES, AND THEN
 MULTIPLIED BY THE ANNUAL PARKING FEE FOR
 RESTAURANT/RETAIL (CURRENTLY AT $948 PER SPACE PER
 YEAR).
 7. ALL ON-STREET PARKING SPACES ALONG THE SITE FRONTAGE
 WILL BE METERED BY THE CITY.
 8. DIAGONAL HATCH SHOULD BE PROVIDED AT THE ONE-WAY
 EGRESS DRIVEWAY ON BARCELONA ROAD TO NARROW THE
 DRIVEWAY WIDTH TO 12 FEET.
  
  
 VALERIO ORICCHIO
 CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER
 561-494-1092
 [email protected]
  
  
  

Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status P Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 01-15-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-01-15 10:17:18PASSED, WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL.
 CONDITIONS
 1. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONDUCT PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
 STUDIES FOR ENHANCED MARKED CROSSWALK ACROSS DIXIE
 HIGHWAY AT BARCELONA ROAD AND CORDOVA ROAD ONE YEAR AND
 TWO YEARS AFTER THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE MET, AND
 CONSTRUCT THE ENHANCED AND MARKED PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS
 WHEN WARRANTED AND APPROVED BY FDOT:
 O CO IS ISSUED FOR AT LEAST 50% OF THE PROPOSED MOVIE
 THEATRE OR RESIDENTIAL UNITS.
 O THE LAST CO IS ISSUED FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
 2. THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING STUDIES SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE LATEST REQUIREMENTS FROM FDOT. THE NECESSARY
 TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN DATA SHALL BE COLLECTED BY THE
 DEVELOPER FOR THE ANALYSES.
 3. PROVIDE SURETY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE ENHANCED
 MARKED CROSSWALK UNTIL THE OBLIGATIONS RELATED TO
 PEDESTRIAN CROSSING STUDIES OR PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK
 CONSTRUCTION (#1 AND #2 ABOVE) ARE FULLY MET.
 4. COORDINATE WITH CITY ON PROVIDING SIDEWALK EASEMENT
 FOR THE PORTION OF SIDEWALK WITHIN THE PROPERTY DURING
 PERMITTING.
 5. THE DEVELOPER SHALL COORDINATE WITH FDOT AND CITY OF
 WEST PALM BEACH ON THE DIXIE HIGHWAY LANE ELIMINATION
 PROJECT ALONG THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE UNTIL THE
 CONSTRUCTION OF THE LANE ELIMINATION PROJECT IS
 COMPLETED. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONSTRUCT BUS SHELTER
 AND LANDSCAPE AT LOCATIONS NOT IN CONFLICT WITH THE
 PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE SHARED USED PATH, OR BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR RELOCATION IF SUCH CONFLICTS OCCUR.
 6. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONTRIBUTE FUNDS TO THE FUTURE
 TRANSIT OPERATIONS. THE ANNUAL CONTRIBUTION SHALL BE
 CALCULATED AS THE NUMBER OF PROPOSED PARKING SPACES
 MINUS THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED PARKING SPACES, AND THEN
 MULTIPLIED BY THE ANNUAL PARKING FEE FOR
 RESTAURANT/RETAIL (CURRENTLY AT $948 PER SPACE PER
 YEAR).
 7. ALL ON-STREET PARKING SPACES ALONG THE SITE FRONTAGE
 WILL BE METERED BY THE CITY.
 8. DIAGONAL HATCH SHOULD BE PROVIDED AT THE ONE-WAY
 EGRESS DRIVEWAY ON BARCELONA ROAD TO NARROW THE
 DRIVEWAY WIDTH TO 12 FEET.
  
  
 SHING TSOI
 CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
 561-494-1141
 [email protected]
 (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS)

Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 10-23-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-10-23 10:46:10TRAFFIC STUDY COMMENTS:
 1. THE COUNTY TPS LETTER WAS DATED JULY 25, 2016.
 PLEASE PROVIDE A REVISED COUNTY TPS LETTER.
 2. BASED ON THE ASSUMPTION IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY, ABOUT
 59.6% OF TOTAL TRIPS OR 115 PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS (IN /
 OUT) WOULD USE THE NORTH GARAGE. THE QUEUING ANALYSIS
 ASSUMES 75% OF THESE 115 TRIPS WOULD USE VALET BUT ONLY
 58 TRIPS ARE USED IN THE ANALYSIS. PLEASE VERIFY AND
 REVISE.
  
 SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
 3. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION (E.G. MEETING NOTES,
 EMAIL COMMUNICATION, OR LETTER FROM FDOT) RELATED TO
 THE DISCUSSION WITH FDOT ON RETAINING THE EXISTING
 ON-STREET PARKING SPACES ON DIXIE HIGHWAY.
 4. THE TRAFFIC STUDY INDICATES THAT SOME VALETED
 VEHICLES MAY BE PICKED UP ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY. PLEASE
 VERIFY IF FDOT ALLOWS VALET OPERATIONS ON DIXIE HIGHWAY
 AND IF A PERMIT IS REQUIRED.
 5. PLEASE VERIFY THE ON-STREET PARKING SPACES PROVIDED
 ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAYS MEET REQUIREMENTS IN FDOT DESIGN
 MANUAL SECTION 212.11.5. ALSO, THE FIRST ON-STREET
 PARKING SPACES ON FLAMINGO DRIVE IS WITHIN 20 FEET OF
 THE CROSSWALK, WHICH DOES NOT MEET MUTCD AND FLORIDA
 STATUTES REQUIREMENTS.
 6. REPAVE THE STREET ALONG PROPERTY FRONTAGE ON
 FLAMINGO DRIVE, BARCELONA ROAD AND CORDOVA ROAD DUE TO
 UTILITY TIE-IN.
 7. DIMENSION THE SIDEWALK WIDTH ON FLAMINGO DRIVE,
 BARCELONA ROAD AND CORDOVA ROAD.
 8. PLEASE INCLUDE AUTOTURN PATHS FOR ALL SERVICE AND
 DELIVERY VEHICLES.
 9. CITY CODE SECTION 94-485 PROHIBITS BACKING UP ONTO
 PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE LOADING ZONE ON BARCELONA ROAD
 WOULD VIOLATE THE CITY CODE.
 10. COORDINATE WITH PALM TRAN ON THE BUS STOP LOCATION,
 INSTALL AN ADA-COMPLIANT BUS SHELTER FOR THE EXISTING
 BUS STOP, AND PROVIDE BUS STOP EASEMENT AS NEEDED. THE
 BUS STOP EASEMENT SHOULD BE AT LEAST 14 FEET BY 8 FEET
 AND BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PROPERTY TO PREVENT THE BUS
 STOP FROM IMPACTING THE FUTURE SHARED USE PATH WHICH
 WILL BE USED BY CYCLISTS AND PEDESTRIANS.
 11. PROVIDE A FUTURE TROLLEY STOP AND CONTRIBUTE FUNDS
 TO THE FUTURE TROLLEY OPERATIONS ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY.
 12. PROVIDE SUBSIDIZED TRANSIT PASS TO EMPLOYEES AS AN
 INCENTIVE FOR USING NON-AUTO MODES OF TRANSPORTATION.
 13. COORDINATE WITH FDOT ON THE LOCATION OF THE SHARED
 USED PATH ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY. TREES SHOULD NOT BE
 PROPOSED ALONG THE PLANNED LOCATION OF THE SHARED USE
 PATH. THE DEVELOPER SHOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR
 RELOCATING THE TREES OUTSIDE THE LOCATION OF THE SHARED
 USE PATH ONCE THE LANE ELIMINATION PROJECT IS COMPLETED
 BY FDOT. ALTERNATIVELY, THE DEVELOPER COULD CONTRIBUTE
 FUNDING TO THE CITY FOR PROVIDING LANDSCAPE AS PART OF
 THE LANE ELIMINATION PROJECT.
  
 CONDITIONS
 1. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONDUCT PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
 STUDIES FOR ENHANCED MARKED CROSSWALK ACROSS DIXIE
 HIGHWAY AT BARCELONA ROAD AND CORDOVA ROAD ONE YEAR AND
 TWO YEARS AFTER THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE MET, AND
 CONSTRUCT THE ENHANCED AND MARKED PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS
 WHEN WARRANTED AND APPROVED BY FDOT:
 O CO IS ISSUED FOR AT LEAST 50% OF THE PROPOSED MOVIE
 THEATRE OR RESIDENTIAL UNITS.
 O THE LAST CO IS ISSUED FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
 2. THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING STUDIES SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE LATEST REQUIREMENTS FROM FDOT. THE NECESSARY
 TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN DATA SHALL BE COLLECTED BY THE
 DEVELOPER FOR THE ANALYSES.
 3. PROVIDE SURETY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE ENHANCED
 MARKED CROSSWALK UNTIL THE OBLIGATIONS RELATED TO
 PEDESTRIAN CROSSING STUDIES OR PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK
 CONSTRUCTION (#1 AND #2 ABOVE) ARE FULLY MET.
 4. COORDINATE WITH CITY ON PROVIDING SIDEWALK EASEMENT
 FOR THE PORTION OF SIDEWALK WITHIN THE PROPERTY DURING
 PERMITTING.
  
  
 SHING TSOI
 CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
 561-494-1141
 [email protected]
 (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS)

Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 06-11-2019 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-06-11 18:02:521. THE COUNTY TPS LETTER WAS DATED JULY 25, 2016.
 PLEASE PROVIDE A VALID COUNTY TPS LETTER.
 2. IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY, INCLUDE DIXIE
 HIGHWAY/BELVEDERE ROAD AS ONE OF THE STUDY
 INTERSECTIONS. ALSO, ANALYZE BOTH SCENARIOS WITH AND
 WITHOUT THE LANE ELIMINATION.
 3. APPROXIMATELY 45% OF OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES ARE
 TANDEM PARKING. PLEASE PROVIDE VALET QUEUING ANALYSIS
 TO VERIFY VEHICLE QUEUES WOULD NOT BACK UP TO FLAMINGO
 DRIVE.
 4. PROVIDE NARRATIVES AND/OR EXHIBITS ON VALET
 CIRCULATION ROUTES.
 5. FOR THE TANDEM PARKING SPACES ON THE GROUND FLOOR,
 THE 24-FOOT PARKING AISLE WIDTH REQUIRED FOR PARKING
 MANEUVER WOULD ENCROACH HALF OF THE SOUTHBOUND CURBSIDE
 LANE. THE PARKING MANEUVER FOR THESE 20 PARKING SPACES
 WOULD BE IN CONFLICT WITH POTENTIALLY UP TO 120
 VEHICLES PER HOUR DURING WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR. PLEASE
 CONSIDER PROVIDING NON-TANDEM PARKING SPACES INSTEAD TO
 PROVIDE ADDITIONAL MANEUVERING SPACE AND MINIMIZE
 CONFLICTS WITH CIRCULATING VEHICLES.
 6. PROVIDE BACK-UP AREA FOR THE DEAD-END PARKING SPACE
 IN THE EL FLAMINGO BUILDING (NORTHEAST CORNER), AND
 BACK-UP AND TURNAROUND AREA FOR THE DEAD-END PARKING
 SPACE IN THE EL CORDOVA BUILDING (SOUTHEAST CORNER).
 7. PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING SPACES PER CITY CODE AND
 ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY.
 8. NO ON-STREET PARKING SPACE SHOULD BE PROVIDED WITHIN
 20 FEET OF CROSSWALK AT AN INTERSECTION PER MUTCD AND
 FLORIDA STATUTES.
 9. CLARIFY IF PUBLIC PARKING SPACE IS AVAILABLE
 ON-SITE.
 10. ON-STREET PARKING SPACES WILL BE METERED BY THE
 CITY.
 11. PLEASE INCLUDE AUTOTURN PATHS FOR ALL SERVICE AND
 DELIVERY VEHICLES.
 12. CITY CODE SECTION 94-485 PROHIBITS BACKING UP ONTO
 PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE TWO LOADING ZONES WOULD
 VIOLATE THE CITY CODE.
 13. DIMENSION THE SIDEWALK WIDTH.
 14. PROVIDE SIDEWALK EASEMENT FOR THE PORTION OF
 SIDEWALK WITHIN THE PROPERTY.
 15. COORDINATE WITH PALM TRAN ON THE BUS STOP LOCATION,
 INSTALL AN ADA-COMPLIANT BUS SHELTER FOR THE EXISTING
 BUS STOP, AND PROVIDE BUS STOP EASEMENT AS NEEDED.
 16. THE SIGN AT THE FLAMINGO DRIVEWAY SHOULD READ
 LEFT-TURN ONLY ON SHEET SP-1.
 17. THE CONCEPTUAL CIVIL PLAN SHOWS SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT
 ACCESS CONFIGURATION THAN THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE REVISE.
 18. PROVIDE A FUTURE TROLLEY STOP AND CONTRIBUTE FUNDS
 TO THE FUTURE TROLLEY OPERATIONS ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY.
 19. PLEASE PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT
 (TDM) STRATEGIES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE
 FOLLOWING, TO ENCOURAGE ALTERNATIVE MODES OF
 TRANSPORTATION:
 O UNBUNDLE PARKING SPACE FROM RESIDENTIAL LEASES
 O OFFER TENANTS AND EMPLOYEES PARKING CASH OUT PROGRAM,
 OR REMOVE FREE PARKING FROM EMPLOYEES AND UNBUNDLE
 PARKING FROM COMMERCIAL LEASE
 O PROVIDE FACILITIES FOR BICYCLE AND/OR MICRO-MOBILITY
 ON-SITE
 20. THE APPLICANT SHOULD EVALUATE AND CONSTRUCT, IF
 WARRANTED, AN ENHANCED MARKED CROSSWALK ACROSS DIXIE
 HIGHWAY AT BARCELONA ROAD AND CORDOVA ROAD UPON OPENING
 OF THE DEVELOPMENT.
 21. REMOVE ON-STREET PARKING ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY.
 ON-STREET PARKING ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY WILL BE PROVIDED
 AS PART OF THE LANE ELIMINATION PROJECT WHEN
 APPROPRIATE.
 22. COORDINATE WITH FDOT ON THE LOCATION OF THE SHARED
 USED PATH ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY. TREES SHOULD NOT BE
 PROPOSED ALONG THE PLANNED LOCATION OF THE SHARED USE
 PATH.
  
  
 SHING TSOI
 CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
 561-494-1141
 [email protected]
 (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS)
  

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 6 Status P Date 10-01-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 10-01-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 10-01-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-10-01 08:21:18TECHNICAL REVIEW OF PLANS SUFFICIENT.

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 5 Status F Date 08-20-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 08-20-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 08-20-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-08-20 12:17:321.) THE PROVIDED REAR SETBACK FOR THE FLAMINGO BUILDING
 IS 17 FT. (NOT 17.7 FT. AS NOTED IN THE WAIVER CHART).
 THEREFORE, THE WAIVER REQUESTED IS 66.6 FT. PLEASE
 ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
 2.) THE CALCULATED REQUIRED REAR SETBACK FOR THE
 CORDOVA BUILDING IS 69.4 FT. (NOT 69.2 FT.). THEREFORE,
 THE WAIVER REQUESTED IS 44.4 FT. (NOT 44.2 FT.). PLEASE
 ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
 3.) PLEASE PROVIDE CLARIFICATION FOR THE FOLLOWING AS
 IT WILL IMPACT THE REQUESTED WAIVERS FOR IMPERMEABLE
 SURFACE AND PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA: PER THE ZLDRS
 MAXIMUM IMPERMEABLE SURFACE REQUIREMENT IS 60% AND
 MINIMUM LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIREMENT IS 15% (TOTAL OF
 100%). THE PROJECT IS PROPOSING 97% IMPERMEABLE SURFACE
 AND 10% LANDSCAPE AREA (TOTAL 107%). PLEASE EXPLAIN THE
 CALCULATIONS, AS THE IMPERMEABLE AND PERVIOUS AREA
 REQUIREMENTS SHOULD ADD UP TO 100%). THIS MAY ALSO
 IMPACT THE SITE DATA CALCULATIONS.
  
 4.) NEED CLARIFICATION ON WAIVER #11 IN THE WAIVER
 CHART, AS THIS WAIVER SEEMS TO REFERENCE SIGNAGE
 REQUIREMENTS IN AN RPD (THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS A CPD).
  
 5.) CLARIFICATION/ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NEEDED ON
 THE PROPOSED SIGN PROGRAM ON SHEET SP-2. IT IS NOT
 CLEAR IF THE SIGNAGE IS SUPPOSED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH
 THE SIGN REQUIREMENTS OF THE GC ZONING DISTRICT AND/OR
 IF THE SIGN PROGRAM REQUIRES WAIVER(S). THERE SEEMS TO
 BE A LOT OF WALL SIGNAGE PROPOSED. THERE NEEDS TO BE
 CLARIFICATION IF THE INTENT IS ONE WALL SIGN PER TENANT
 OR IF THERE ARE EXCEPTIONS FOR MULTIPLE SIGNS PER
 TENANT.
  
 6.) CORRECTION NEEDS TO BE MADE TO CLEARLY DISTINGUISH
 FAR/NON-FAR SPACE ADJACENT TO THE ELEVATOR, LOBBY AND
 RETAIL SPACE OF THE CORDOVA BUILDING ON SHEET A-1.01.
 ADJUST FAR/NON-FAR CALCULATIONS IF NECESSARY.
  
 7.) CORRECTION NEEDS TO BE MADE TO CLEARLY DISTINGUISH
 FAR/NON-FAR SPACE IN THE CORDOVA BUILDING ON SHEET
 A-1.04. PER THE ZLDR S.94-145(11), THE FLOOR AREA SHALL
 BE MEASURED FROM THE OUTSIDE FACE OF THE EXTERIOR WALL,
 WHICH MEANS THE WALLS SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE FAR
 CALCULATIONS. ADJUST FAR/NON-FAR CALCULATIONS IF
 NECESSARY.
  
 8.) ON SHEET A-3.01: WHAT ARE THE SETBACKS FOR THE
 UPPER TIERED LEVELS OF THE FLAMINGO AND CORDOVA
 BUILDINGS FACING THE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL? THE
 SETBACK DIMENSION WILL HELP STAFF WITH THE PROJECT
 ANALYSIS.
  
 9.) PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL LIGHT POLE FIXTURES ARE
 SETBACK AT LEAST 5 FT. FROM THE PROPERTY LINES. INCLUDE
 DIMENSIONS TO DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENCY WITH THE ZLDRS.
 [NOTE: STAFF CANNOT DETERMINE IF THE POLE FIXTURES SITE
 INSIDE OR OUTSIDE OF THE REQUIRED 5 FT. SETBACK. THIS
 WAS A MISSED COMMENT BY STAFF ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEW.]
  
  
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:
  
 * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 * CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 * INCLUDE THE REVISION DATE TO ANY REVISED SHEETS TO
 KEEP TRACK OF ALL CHANGES MADE TO THE PROJECT.
  
 * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX
 (6) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 INCHES X
 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 INCHES, AND
 AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT
 CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE ANY
 QUESTIONS.
  

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 01-21-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 01-21-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 01-21-2020 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-01-21 08:47:131.) THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF THE FLAMINGO BUILDING IS 75
 FT. (NOT 71.8 FT.) AS NOTED IN THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.
 THE HEIGHT AND SETBACK CALCULATIONS AND TABLE
 INFORMATION SHOULD BE REVISED TO ADDRESS THE MAXIMUM
 HEIGHT. [NOTE: THIS COMMENT WAS MISSED BY STAFF IN THE
 LAST RESUBMITTAL]
  
 2.) THERE IS A PROPOSED 8 FT. HIGH CONCRETE WALL ALONG
 THE EAST PROPERTY LINE ABUTTING 314 FLAMINGO DRIVE. THE
 EXISTING STRUCTURE AT 314 FLAMINGO DRIVE SEEMS TO HAVE
 A 0 FT. SETBACK FROM THE PROPERTY LINE (NEEDS TO BE
 VERIFIED). IF THIS IS THE CASE, THE LOCATION OF THE
 PROPOSED WALL WILL NEED TO BE RELOCATED SO AS NOT TO
 CONFLICT WITH THE EXISTING STRUCTURE. [NOTE: THIS
 COMMENT WAS MISSED BY STAFF IN THE LAST RESUBMITTAL]
  
 3.) THE PROPOSED NUMBER OF STORIES SEEM TO BE 5 (NOT 4)
 SINCE USABLE SPACE (I.E. GYM) IS LOCATED ON THE 5TH
 FLOOR. INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE PLANS SHOULD BE
 ADDRESSED ACCORDINGLY. [NOTE: THIS COMMENT WAS MISSED
 BY STAFF IN THE LAST RESUBMITTAL]
  
 4.) CHECK THE PROPOSED PARKING COUNT. THE COUNT STILL
 SEEMS TO BE INCORRECT AND IT HAS AFFECTED THE
 CALCULATIONS FOR PARKING. ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
 5.) THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT PROVIDED IN THE
 ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS SEEM TO BE INCONSISTENT. CLARIFY
 FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
 6.) SOME SPACES WITHIN THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS HAVE
 BEEN EXCLUDED FROM THE FAR CALCULATIONS WHICH STAFF
 BELIEVES SHOULD HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN THE FAR
 CALCULATIONS. THE ARCHITECT MUST CLARIFY THESE SPACES
 AND ADJUST THE FAR CALCULATIONS IN ALL APPLICABLE PLANS
 ACCORDINGLY.
  
 7.) DEMONSTRATE THAT THE BICYCLE STORAGE AREAS CAN
 ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING
 SPACES.
  
 8.) THE ARCHITECT WILL NEED TO MEET WITH STAFF TO
 CLARIFY OTHER MINOR INCONSISTENCIES WITH THE FAR
 CALCULATIONS AS DEPICTED IN THE ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR
 PLANS.
  
 9.) IT IS ADVISED THAT THE APPLICANT MEET WITH STAFF TO
 DISCUSS THE INCONSISTENCIES AND CONCERNS WITH THE
 PROJECT. PLEASE CONTACT STAFF TO SET UP A MEETING.
  
  
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL
  
 * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 * CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 * INCLUDE THE REVISION DATE TO ANY REVISED SHEETS TO
 KEEP TRACK OF ALL CHANGES MADE TO THE PROJECT.
  
 * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF
 FIFTEEN (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5
 INCHES X 11 INCHES, AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17
 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600.00).
  
 * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE
 QUESTIONS.
  

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 11-01-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 11-01-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 11-01-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-11-01 13:28:38GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) PROVIDE AUTO TURN DIAGRAM FOR LOADING AND UNLOADING
 TRUCKS FOR BOTH BUILDINGS. NOTE: THE JUSTIFICATION
 STATEMENT STATES AN AUTO TURN DIAGRAM HAS BEEN
 PROVIDED; HOWEVER, IT SEEMS TO BE MISSING FROM THE
 SUBMITTALS.
  
 2.) AMEND THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT TO ADDRESS THE
 FOLLOWING: WILL THERE BE VALET PARKING ATTENDANT AT ALL
 TIMES? IF SO, THIS MUST BE NOTED IN THE STATEMENT, AS
 VALET PARKING MUST HAVE AN ATTENDANT; PER ZLDR
 S.94-207(B)(1), THE PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SHALL
 COMPLY WITH S.94-33, ARTICLE XII AND ARTICLE XVII.
 PLEASE PROVIDE THE RESPONSES FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
 3.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE CITY'S PUBLIC
 UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR
 WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE
 COLLECTION SERVICES. ALSO, PROVIDE LETTERS FROM THE
 FOLLOWING PUBLIC UTILITIES CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR
 OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISION OF THEIR
 SERVICES: AT&T, FPU AND FPL. NOTE: LETTERS MUST
 REFERENCE ALL APPLICABLE PARCELS OF THE PROJECT.
 [9/24/19 REPEAT COMMENT]
  
 4.) A PREDETERMINATION LETTER FROM THE FLORIDA
 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) IS REQUIRED FOR THE
 PROPOSED CHANGES ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY [6/11/19 AND
 9/24/19 REPEAT COMMENT]
  
  
 SITE PLAN COMMMENTS:
  
 1.) AS DISCUSSED AT THE MEETING HELD ON 11/1/2019 WITH
 STAFF AND THE AGENT, THE FAR CALCULATIONS MUST BE
 REVISED, TO ACCURATELY REFLECT FAR AND NON-FAR SPACES.
  
 2.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE SITE DATA
 TABULAR AND/OR WAIVER CHART: THERE IS AN ASTERISK BY
 THE WORD "OTHER." PLEASE DEFINE; CORRECT THE
 RESIDENTIAL DENSITY TO 32.15 DU/AC (NOT 32 DU/AC, AS
 THIS IMPLIES THAT THE DENSITY IS 32 DU/AC WHICH IS NOT
 ACCURATE; CHECK PARKING CALCULATIONS, AS THEY SEEM TO
 BE INCORRECT; ALSO NOTE THAT THE CALCULATIONS FOR GUEST
 PARKING IS BASED ON THE OVERALL UNIT COUNT FOR THE
 PROJECT; SETBACK CALCULATIONS ARE INCORRECT - PLEASE
 ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
 3.) ARE THE IMPROVEMENTS ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY
 CONSISTENT WITH THE SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY CORRIDOR
 IMPROVEMENT PLAN? PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION OF THE
 CORRESPONDANCE WITH FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
 TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) STATING THAT THERE ARE NO ISSUES
 WITH THE PROPOSED CHANGES ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY.
  
 4.) IT IS VERY DIFFICULT TO SEE THE EXTENT OF THE
 PROPOSED 8 FT. HIGH WALL ALONG THE REAR PROPERTY LINES
 OF BOTH PARCELS (EL FLAMINGO AND EL CORDOVA). PLEASE
 ADDRESS. [9/24/19 REVISED COMMENT]
  
 5.) SETBACK DISTANCE OF ALL PROJECTIONS (I.E.
 BALCONIES) MUST BE DIMENSIONED IN THE SITE PLAN. NOT
 ALL PROJECTIONS (I.E. BALCONY) AND/OR SETBACK
 DIMENSIONS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED.
  
 6.) BICYCLE RACK DOES NOT MATCH BICYCLE RACK DETAIL ON
 SHEET SP-2.
  
  
 ARCHITECTURAL (FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS):
  
 1.) ON SHEET A-0CV, THE FAR AND UNIT CALCULATIONS ARE
 INCORRECT. ALSO, THE FAR SPACE CALCULATIONS WILL NEED
 TO BE ADJUSTED FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
 2.) ARE THE ADJACENT BUILDINGS SCALED IN THE SITE
 SECTIONS (SHEET A-800)? IF NOT, PLEASE SCALE, AS THIS
 WAS REQUESTED IN PAST COMMENTS AND DISCUSSIONS BETWEEN
 STAFF AND THE APPLICANT.
  
 5.) THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING
 SPACES WITHIN THE UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE REQUIRES
 APPROVAL FROM THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE
 WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION THAT THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT HAS
 REVIEWED AND AND HAS APPROVED THE LOCATIONS OF THE
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. [6/11/19 AND 924/19 REPEAT
 COMMENT].
  
  
 SIGNAGE COMMENTS:
  
 1.) AT MINIMUM, A NOTE SHALL BE ADDED TO ALL PLAN
 SHEETS WITH SIGNAGE INDICATING THAT ALL PROPOSED
 SIGNAGE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE SIGNAGE REGULATIONS OF
 THE UNDERLYING ZONING DISTRICT. [9/24/19 REVISED
 COMMENT]
  
  
 PHOTOMETRIC/LIGHTING PLAN COMMENTS:
  
 1.) ANY SOURCE OF ILLUMINATION LOCATED WITHIN A
 COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD) DISTRICT SHALL NOT
 EXCEED ONE-FOOT CANDLE AT OR BEYOND THE BOUNDARIES OF
 THE SUCH DEVELOPMENT. THE PROJECT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH
 THIS REQUIREMENT. [9/24/19 REPEAT COMMENT]
  
 2.) ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE
 GLARE AND SHALL BE ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE
 AWAY FROM ALL ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT
 RESIDENCES, OR PUBLIC THOROUGHFARE. [9/24/19 REPEAT
 COMMENT - ALTHOUGH A NOTE HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE
 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN, THE NOTE IS INCOMPLETE AND DOES NOT
 ADDRESS THE FULL EXTENT OF THE ZLDR REQUIREMENT.]
  
  
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:
  
 * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 * CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 * INCLUDE THE REVISION DATE TO ANY REVISED SHEETS TO
 KEEP TRACK OF ALL CHANGES MADE TO THE PROJECT.
  
 * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF
 FIFTEEN (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5
 INCHES X 11 INCHES, AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17
 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600.00).
  
 * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE
 QUESTIONS.
  

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 09-24-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 09-24-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 09-24-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-09-24 14:27:50GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) A SIGNED OWNER'S CONSENT FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER IS
 REQUIRED. THE SUBMITTED OWNER'S CONSENT DOES NOT
 ADDRESS BOTH CORPORATIONS. PLEASE ADDRESS. [6/11/2019
 REVISED COMMENT]
  
 2.) PLEASE REVISE THE JUSTIFICATION LETTER (DATED
 5/14/2019) TO ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING INCONSISTENCIES:
 THIS HISTORY SECTION ON PAGES 2 AND 3 DOES NOT SEEM TO
 REFLECT THE CORRECT OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHT (OVERALL
 BUILDING HEIGHT IS NOT 69 FT. AS NOTED); UNIT MIX
 THROUGHOUT THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT IS MULTIFAMILY
 APARTMENTS AND TOWNHOUSES - JUSTIFICATION KEEPS
 REFERRING TO APARTMENTS. THIS MUST BE CLARIFIED. ALSO,
 PLEASE CLARIFY IF ALL 58 UNITS (INCLUDING THE
 TOWNHOUSES) WILL BE RENTALS; IN THE CPD AND SITE PLAN
 SECTION ON PAGES 7 AND 8: PLEASE ENSURE TOWNHOUSES ARE
 ALSO PROPOSED IN THE DEVELOPMENT (VERBIAGE SEEMS TO
 IMPLY ONLY APARTMENT UNITS); CHECK THE BREAKDOWN OF THE
 PROPOSED INTENSITY ON PAGE 8 (I.E. TABULATION FOR
 PARKING DOES NOT MATCH THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE
 SITE PLAN); IN THE PARKING AND CIRCULATION SECTION ON
 PAGES 8 AND 9: PARKING NUMBERS DO NOT MATCH THE NUMBERS
 PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE CHECK CALCULATIONS.
 MORE INFORMATION IS REQUIRED FOR PARKING CIRCULATION
 AND HOW THAT FUNCTIONS WITH THE VALET PARKING. IT
 STATES IN THE LETTER THAT PARKING WILL BE OPEN TO THE
 NON-COMMERCIAL PUBLIC. WHAT ARE THE ASSURANCES THAT THE
 PROJECT WILL ALWAYS MAINTAIN SUFFICIENT PARKING FOR THE
 USES WITHIN AND HAVING THE ABILITY TO PROVIDE
 ADDITIONAL PARKING FOR OTHERS; PER ZLDR S.94-207(B)(1),
 THE PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SHALL COMPLY WITH
 S.94-35(C), S.94-33, ARTICLE XII AND ARTICLE XVII.
 PLEASE PROVIDE THE RESPONSES FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE
 ZLDRS; IN THE COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD)
 STANDARDS ON PAGES 11 AND 12, #8 MAKES REFERENCES TO AN
 INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. PLEASE
 CORRECT; THE WAIVERS SECTION ON PAGES 12-17 DOES NOT
 PROVIDE MUCH INFORMATION ON THE MITIGATION MEASURES FOR
 EACH WAIVER REQUEST. STAFF NEEDS TO KNOW WHAT MEASURES
 ARE BEING MADE TO REDUCE THE IMPACT(S) OF EACH WAIVER
 REQUEST. [NOTE: ALTHOUGH SOME OTHER COMMENTS MAY HAVE
 BEEN ADDRESS, STAFF WOULD NEED TO VERIFY THE
 INFORMATION IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PLANS. NO PLANS WERE
 SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE 8/2/2019 RESUBMITTAL.]
  
 3.) A TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW LETTER
 FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION IS
 REQUIRED. THE LETTER SHALL STATE THAT THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT MEETS THE TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OF THE
 COUNTY, PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE PROJECT FOR A PUBLIC
 HEARING. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT]
  
 4.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE CITY'S PUBLIC
 UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR
 WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE
 COLLECTION SERVICES. [NOTE: A LETTER FROM THE CITY'S
 PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS BEEN PROVIDED; HOWEVER,
 IT DOES NOT REFERENCE ALL PARCELS IN THE SCOPE OF THE
 PROJECT. PLEASE ADDRESS.]
  
 5.) PROVIDE LETTERS FROM THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC UTILITIES
 CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH
 INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE
 PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, FPU AND FPL. [NOTE:
 THE LETTERS FROM AT&T, FPU AND FPL DOES NOT REFERENCE
 ALL PARCELS IN THE SCOPE OF THE PROJECT. PLEASE
 ADDRESS.]
  
 6.) A MASSING STUDY AS WELL AS CROSS SECTIONS OF THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT IN RELATIONSHIP TO THE
 IMMEDIATE/SURROUNDING AREAS/BUILDINGS IS REQUIRED.
 [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT]
  
 7.) A PREDETERMINATION LETTER FROM THE FLORIDA
 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) IS REQUIRED FOR THE
 PROPOSED CHANGES ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY. [6/11/2019
 REPEAT COMMENT]
  
 8.) PLANS HAVE A LARGE AMOUNT OF DATA AND NEEDS TO BE
 MADE CLEAR BY AVOIDING ANY TEXT OVERLAP, ETC.
 [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT - NO PLANS PROVIDED WITH THIS
 RESUBMITTAL]
  
 9.) PLEASE BE SURE TO INCLUDE THE REVISION DATE TO THE
 REVISED SHEETS TO KEEP TRACK OF ALL CHANGES TO THE
 PROJECT. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT - NO PLANS PROVIDED
 WITH THIS RESUBMITTAL]
  
  
 SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
  
 1.) PER ZLDR SECTION 94-145(11), THE FAR INCLUDES
 AIR-CONDITIONED OR FULLY ENCLOSED STORAGE SPACES,
 ENCLOSED AREAS ON THE ROOFTOP SUCH AS BATHROOMS AND
 LOBBIES, STAIRS AND ELEVATOR AREAS, AND EXTERNAL
 UNENCLOSED CIRCULATION AREAS. THE FLOOR AREA RATIO
 (FAR) CALCULATION FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT APPEARS TO
 BE INCORRECT, AS CERTAIN SPACES (I.E. STAIRS,
 ELEVATORS, ETC.) HAVE BEEN EXCLUDED FROM THE FAR (AS
 PROVIDED IN THE SITE DATA NOTES). THE FAR CANNOT EXCEED
 1.5. PLEASE ADDRESS. [ZLDR S.94-243, TABLE VIII-3]
 [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT]
  
 2.) WHAT IS THE SETBACK DISTANCE FROM THE EXTENT OF THE
 UNDERGROUND GARAGE TO THE PROPERTY LINE? THE
 UNDERGROUND GARAGE SEEMS TO EXTEND CLOSER TO THE
 PROPERTY LINE THAN THE ABOVE GROUND STRUCTURES FOR BOTH
 BUILDINGS AND NO DIMENSIONS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED FOR THIS
 SETBACK. THE UNDERGROUND STRUCTURE IS A PART OF THE
 BUILDING AND THEREFORE, THE SETBACKS SHALL BE MEASURED
 FROM THE EXTENT OF THE UNDERGROUND GARAGE (CLOSEST
 POINT) TO THE PROPERTY LINES. [6/11/2019 REPEAT
 COMMENT]
  
 3.) PARKING/LOADING CONFIGURATION WHICH REQUIRE BACKING
 DIRECTLY ONTO A STREET FROM A PARKING OR LOADING SPACE
 FOR MORE THAN TWO (2) RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND ALL
 NON-RESIDENTIAL USES SHALL BE PROHIBITED IN ALL
 RESIDENTIAL AND NON-RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS. THE
 LOADING AREA WITHIN THE EL FLAMINGO BUILDING SEEM TO
 REQUIRE VEHICLES TO BACK OUT INTO THESE PROHIBITED
 ZONES. PLEASE ADDRESS. [ZLDR S.94-485(J)(1)] [6/11/2019
 REPEAT COMMENT]
  
 4.) ARE THE IMPROVEMENTS ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY
 CONSISTENT WITH THE SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY CORRIDOR
 IMPROVEMENT PLAN? PLEASE MEET WITH THE CITY'S
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT TO COORDINATE AND
 ADDRESS. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT]
  
 5.) STAFF IS REQUESTING THE APPLICANT ACCOMMODATE AN 8
 FT. HIGH CONCRETE WALL ALONG THE REAR PROPERTY LINES OF
 BOTH PARCELS (EL FLAMINGO AND EL CORDOVA) TO HELP
 MITIGATE THE IMPACT OF THE PROJECT NEXT TO THE EXISTING
 RESIDENTIAL USES. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT]
  
 6.) THE PROPOSED VALET BULLPEN SEEMS TO BE IN CONFLICT
 WITH THE DESIGNATED LANES FOR INTERNAL CIRCULATION.
 PLEASE ADDRESS. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT]
  
 7.) THE CIVIL PLAN SHOWS THE LOCATION OF WATER METERS
 NEAR THE ACCESS/EXIT POINTS OF THE BUILDINGS. PLEASE
 SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE WATER METERS IN THE PLAN AND
 PROVIDE A DETAIL. THE DETAIL IS REQUIRED TO ENSURE THAT
 THE METER(S) WILL NOT IMPACT VISIBILITY AND APPROPRIATE
 SCREENING MEASURES ARE IMPLEMENTED. [6/11/2019 REPEAT
 COMMENT]
  
 8.) HOW FAR DO THE BALCONIES EXTEND INTO THE
 SETBACK(S)? BALCONIES CANNOT ENCROACH MORE THAN 3 FT.
 INTO ANY SETBACK. PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS TO
 DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENCY. [ZLDR S.94-305(B)(2)]
 [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT]
  
 9.) ALL ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (I.E. HVAC
 EQUIPMENT) SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW. PLEASE PROVIDE
 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION/ILLUSTRATION TO HOW THE PROJECT
 WILL COMPLY WITH THIS REQUIREMENT. [6/11/2019 REPEAT
 COMMENT]
  
 10.) THE EXISTING USE WEST OF THE EL FLAMINGO BUILDING
 IS A PRIVATE SCHOOL (NOT AUTO SALES, AS SPECIFIED IN
 THE PLAN). PLEASE ADDRESS FOR ACCURACY. [6/11/2019
 REPEAT COMMENT]
  
 11.) THE EXISTING USES WEST OF THE EL CORDOVA BUILDING
 SEEMS TO BE AN ART GALLERY AND RESTAURANT, AND PARKING
 LOT ASSOCIATED WITH THE GREENE SCHOOL. PLEASE ADDRESS
 FOR ACCURACY. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT]
  
 12.) PLEASE LABEL ALL BUILDING SETBACKS IN THE PLAN.
 [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT]
  
 13.) A STALL STRIPING DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE
 PLAN. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT]
  
 14.) BICYCLE PARKING IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO ZLDR
 S.94-485(9). PLEASE ADDRESS. A BICYCLE PARKING DETAIL
 IS ALSO REQUIRED IN THE PLAN. [6/11/2019 REPEAT
 COMMENT]
  
 15.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE SITE DATA
 TABULAR: APPLICATION NUMBER: PB 1712C/Z19050024;
 RECALCULATION OF FAR REQUIRED; PROPOSED NUMBER OF
 DWELLING UNITS FOR THE PROJECT IS 58 (NOT 56);
 RECALCULATION OF REQUIRED AND PROPOSED PARKING
 REQUIRED. THE PARKING CALCULATIONS SEEM TO BE
 INCORRECT. ADDITIONALLY, THE PARKING COUNT DOES NOT
 MATCH THE PARKING CALCULATIONS PROVIDED IN THE
 ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS; PROPOSED PARKING SHOULD INCLUDE
 THE VALET PARKING CALCULATIONS (SINCE IT WILL NOT COUNT
 TOWARDS REQUIRED PARKING); PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING FOR
 THE PROJECT; PROVIDE THE LANDSCAPE/PERVIOUS SURFACE
 AREA CALCULATION (REQUIRED AND PROPOSED) IN SQUARE
 FEET; RECALCULATE LOADING SPACE REQUIREMENT. SEEMS TO
 BE INCORRECT; CHECK THE NUMBER OF BUILDING STORIES
 PROVIDED IN THE TABULAR (TABLE INDICATE 7 STORIES.
 HOWEVER, PLANS SEEM TO SHOW 4 STORIES ABOVE GROUND).
 [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT]
  
 16.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS TABULAR: PER ZLDR ARTICLE VIII, THE MINIMUM
 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE REQUIREMENT IS 85% (NOT 80%). THIS
 MAY IMPACT THE WAIVER REQUEST FOR THE IMPERVIOUS
 SURFACE REQUIREMENT; THE LANGUAGE IN THE NOTE AT THE
 BOTTOM OF THE TABLE IS NOT CONSISTENT. [6/11/2019
 REPEAT COMMENT]
  
 17.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE
 SETBACKS/SEPARATIONS TABULAR: REQUIRED SETBACK
 CALCULATIONS ARE INCORRECT. THIS NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED
 AS IT WILL IMPACT THE WAIVER REQUESTS TO THE REQUIRED
 SETBACKS; IT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A LEGEND TO
 IDENTIFY WHAT "N" AND "S" MEANS. [6/11/2019 REPEAT
 COMMENT]
  
 18.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE WAIVER CHART:
 REQUIRED SETBACKS ARE INCORRECT AND WILL NEED TO BE
 CORRECTED AS IT WILL IMPACT THE WAIVERS REQUESTED; THE
 REQUIRED MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA IS 85% (NOT
 80%). CALCULATIONS WILL NEED TO BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY.
 [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT]
  
 19.) THE SITE DATA TABULAR INDICATES A TOTAL OF THREE
 (3) LOADING ZONES PROVIDED; HOWEVER, ONLY TWO (2) HAVE
 BEEN COUNTED IN THE PLAN. PLEASE ADDRESS. [6/11/2019
 REPEAT COMMENT]
  
 20.) SHOW THE WIDTH OF THE ROADWAY FOR ALL PUBLIC
 STREETS IN THE PLAN (I.E. FLAMINGO, BARCELONA, CORDOVA,
 ETC.) [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT]
  
  
 ARCHITECTURAL (FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS):
  
 1.) PROVIDE PLANS ILLUSTRATING WHAT SPACES IN THE
 PROPOSED BUILDINGS ARE COUNTED IN THE FAR CALCULATIONS
 (I.E. USE SHADING/HATCHING, ETC.); ALSO PROVIDE THE
 DETAILED CALCULATIONS FOR EACH FLOOR. [6/11/2019 REPEAT
 COMMENT]
  
 2.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE PARKING GARAGE
 PLANS (SHEETS A-1.07 AND A-1.08): PARKING CALCULATIONS
 SEEM TO BE INCORRECT; DIMENSION OUT THE STALLS, AISLES,
 WALKWAYS AND DRIVE AISLES; THERE SEEMS TO BE MORE
 COMPACT PARKING SPACES COUNTED THEN NOTED IN THE PLANS;
 DIMENSION OUT THE 2 FT. CURB OVERHANG; ARE WHEEL STOPS
 PROVIDED FOR THE STALLS? IF SO, PLEASE ILLUSTRATE; PER
 ZLDR S.94-485(O), ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE
 LOCATED SO THAT USERS ARE NOT COMPELLED TO WALK OR
 OTHERWISE MOVE BEHIND A PARKED VEHICLE. THE LOCATION OF
 THE PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES WITHIN THE
 UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE REQUIRES APPROVAL FROM THE
 BUILDING DEPARTMENT. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT]
  
 3.) A DETAILED EXPLANATION IS NEEDED ON HOW THE PARKING
 GARAGE WILL FUNCTION FOR THE RESIDENTS AND
 NON-RESIDENTS OF THE PROJECT, SPECIFICALLY: THERE ARE A
 NUMBER OF TANDEM PARKING SPACES WHICH SEEM ONLY
 REASONABLE FOR THE OCCUPANTS OF THE BUILDING(S) TO
 UTILIZE. HOW WILL THESE SPACES BE RESERVED/IDENTIFIED
 FOR RESIDENTIAL PARKING ONLY, ETC.; PLEASE ENSURE THAT
 THERE IS SUFFICIENT PARKING FOR EACH USE (I.E. THEATRE,
 RETAIL, RESTAURANT) THAT WILL BE ACCESSIBLE TO THE
 PATRONS/GENERAL PUBLIC (I.E. EXCESS TO THE TANDEM
 PARKING). STAFF?S PARKING CALCULATION SEEM TO INDICATE
 THAT THERE IS INSUFFICIENT PARKING FOR THE COMMERCIAL
 USES. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT]
  
 4.) WHAT IS THE OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHT FOR THE EL
 CORDOVA BUILDING? THERE SEEMS TO BE A DISCREPANCY
 WITHIN THE PLANS (I.E. IS IT 64.67 FT. PER SHEET A-2.01
 OR IS IT 68.67 FT. PER SHEET A-3.01). PLEASE CLARIFY AS
 THE BUILDING HEIGHT MAY IMPACT THE REQUIRED SETBACKS
 FOR THE BUILDING. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT]
  
 5.) WHAT IS THE HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED DECORATIVE
 FINIALS. DECORATIVE FEATURES MAY NOT EXCEED THE
 DISTRICT HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS BY 10%. [ZLDR S.94-306]
 [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT]
  
 6.) PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY ARCHITECTURAL PLANS MOVING
 FORWARD TO A PUBLIC HEARING SHALL BE SIGNED, DATED AND
 SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT]
  
  
 SIGNAGE COMMENTS:
  
 1.) NO INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED ON SIGNAGE. PLEASE
 PROVIDE INFORMATION ON HOW SIGNAGE WILL BE HANDLED FOR
 THE PROJECT (I.E. SIGNAGE PROGRAM, ETC.). [6/11/2019
 REPEAT COMMENT]
  
  
 PHOTOMETRICS/LIGHTING PLAN COMMENTS:
  
 1.) ANY SOURCE OF ILLUMINATION LOCATED WITHIN A
 COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD) DISTRICT SHALL NOT
 EXCEED ONE-FOOT CANDLE AT OR BEYOND THE BOUNDARIES OF
 SUCH DEVELOPMENT. THE PROJECT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THIS
 REQUIREMENT. [ZLDR S.94-209(D)(8)] [6/11/2019 REPEAT
 COMMENT]
  
 2.) THE PHOTOMETRICS HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED ALONG ALL
 BOUNDARIES (INSIDE AND OUT) OF THE PROJECT. PLEASE
 ADDRESS SO THAT STAFF CAN EVALUATE THE ILLUMINATION FOR
 CONSISTENCY WITH THE ZLDRS. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT]
  
 3.) ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE
 GLARE AND SHALL BE ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE
 AWAY FROM ALL ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT
 RESIDENCES, OR PUBLIC THOROUGHFARE. PLEASE PROVIDE
 INFORMATION HOW THIS REQUIREMENT WILL BE ADDRESSED.
 [ZLDR S.94-309(A)] [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT]
  
  
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:
  
 * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 * CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF
 FIFTEEN (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5
 INCHES X 11 INCHES, AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17
 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600.00).
  
 * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE
 QUESTIONS.
  

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-11-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 06-11-2019 Time   Rev Time  
Received By llouie Date 06-11-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-06-11 14:47:28GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING REQUIRED INFORMATION
 IN THE SUBMITTED 2019 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: PROJECT
 LOCATION: MISSING 2100 S. DIXIE HIGHWAY AS AN ADDRESS;
 309 BARCELONA ROAD IS LISTED IN THE PROJECT LOCATION.
 HOWEVER, THIS ADDRESS IS NOT A PART OF THE PROJECT
 SCOPE. PLEASE REMOVE THIS ADDRESS FROM THE APPLICATION;
 NEED SEPARATE SHEET IDENTIFYING ALL PARCEL CONTROL
 NUMBERS (PCNS) ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT, PER THE
 APPLICATION; 2100 SDH, LLC IS MISSING AS A PROPERTY
 OWNER. A SIGNED OWNERS CONSENT FORM FROM THIS PROPERTY
 OWNER IS REQUIRED; APPLICATION SHALL BE SIGNED AND
 DATED BY THE APPLICANT; THE OWNERS CONSENT FORM FOR
 2000 SDH, LLC, MUST IDENTIFY ALL PCNS AND ATTACH LEGAL
 DESCRIPTION.
  
 2.) PLEASE REVISE THE JUSTIFICATION LETTER (DATED
 5/14/2019) TO ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING INCONSISTENCIES:
 THE INTRODUCTION ON PAGE 1 REFERENCES THE REQUEST FOR
 THE APPROVAL OF A FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT
 (FLUMA). THE FLUMA DOES NOT APPLY; CHECK THE EXISTING
 USES IN THE USE TABLE ON PAGE 2. (SPECIFICALLY, THE
 EXISTING USES TO THE WEST I.E. GREENE SCHOOL); THE
 HISTORY SECTION ON PAGES 2 AND 3 DOES NOT SEEM TO
 REFLECT THE CORRECT OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHT (OVERALL
 BUILDING HEIGHT IS NOT 69 FT. AS NOTED); IN THE
 VISIONING SECTION ON PAGES 3 AND 4, THE SUMMARY SEEMS
 TO EXCLUDE THE PURCHASE OF 2020 SOUTH DIXIE HWY. THIS
 PARCEL SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE SUMMARY, AS THE PARCEL
 IS PART OF THE PROPOSED CPD. ALSO, PLEASE CLARIFY IF
 ALL 58 UNITS (INCLUDING THE TOWNHOUSES) WILL BE
 RENTALS; IN THE CPD AND SITE PLAN SECTION ON PAGES 7
 AND 8: PLEASE ENSURE TOWNHOUSES ARE ALSO PROPOSED IN
 THE DEVELOPMENT (VERBIAGE SEEMS TO IMPLY ONLY APARTMENT
 UNITS); CHECK THE BREAKDOWN OF THE PROPOSED INTENSITY
 ON PAGE 8 (I.E. TABULATION FOR PARKING DOES NOT MATCH
 THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN); IN THE
 PARKING AND CIRCULATION SECTION ON PAGES 8 AND 9:
 PARKING NUMBERS DO NOT MATCH THE NUMBERS PROVIDED IN
 THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE CHECK CALCULATIONS. MORE
 INFORMATION IS REQUIRED FOR PARKING CIRCULATION AND HOW
 THAT FUNCTIONS WITH THE VALET PARKING. IT STATES IN THE
 LETTER THAT PARKING WILL BE OPEN TO THE NON-COMMERCIAL
 PUBLIC. WHAT ARE THE ASSURANCES THAT THE PROJECT WILL
 ALWAYS MAINTAIN SUFFICIENT PARKING FOR THE USES WITHIN
 AND HAVING THE ABILITY TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PARKING
 FOR OTHERS; PER ZLDR S.94-207(B)(1), THE PROPOSED
 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SHALL COMPLY WITH S.94-35(C),
 S.94-33, ARTICLE XII AND ARTICLE XVII. PLEASE PROVIDE
 THE RESPONSES FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE ZLDRS; IN THE
 COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD) STANDARDS ON PAGES
 11 AND 12, #8 MAKES REFERENCES TO AN INDUSTRIAL PLANNED
 DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. PLEASE CORRECT; THE WAIVERS
 SECTION ON PAGES 12-17 DOES NOT PROVIDE MUCH
 INFORMATION ON THE MITIGATION MEASURES FOR EACH WAIVER
 REQUEST. STAFF NEEDS TO KNOW WHAT MEASURES ARE BEING
 MADE TO REDUCE THE IMPACT(S) OF EACH WAIVER REQUEST.
  
 3.) A TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW LETTER
 FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION IS
 REQUIRED. THE LETTER SHALL STATE THAT THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT MEETS THE TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OF THE
 COUNTY, PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE PROJECT FOR A PUBLIC
 HEARING.
  
 4.) A SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION (SCAD)
 LETTER FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY IS
 REQUIRED PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE PROJECT FOR A PUBLIC
 HEARING.
  
 5.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE CITY'S PUBLIC
 UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR
 WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE
 COLLECTION SERVICES.
  
 6.) PROVIDE LETTERS FROM THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC UTILITIES
 CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH
 INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE
 PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, FPU, FPL AND
 COMCAST.
  
 7.) AN UPDATED ADDRESS LIST AND RADIUS MAP OF ALL
 PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FT. OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
 IS MISSING FROM THE APPLICATION AND SHALL BE PROVIDED
 TO STAFF FOR THE FILE. PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THERE ARE
 OVER 50 ENVELOPES, THE APPLICANT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE
 FOR MAILING OUT THE REQUIRED NOTICES.
  
 8.) A MASSING STUDY AS WELL AS CROSS SECTIONS OF THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT IN RELATIONSHIP TO THE
 IMMEDIATE/SURROUNDING AREAS/BUILDINGS IS REQUIRED.
  
 9.) A PREDETERMINATION LETTER FROM THE FLORIDA
 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) IS REQUIRED FOR THE
 PROPOSED CHANGES ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY.
  
 10.) PLANS HAVE A LARGE AMOUNT OF DATA AND NEEDS TO BE
 MADE CLEAR BY AVOIDING ANY TEXT OVERLAP, ETC.
  
 11.) PLEASE BE SURE TO INCLUDE THE REVISION DATE TO THE
 REVISED SHEETS TO KEEP TRACK OF ALL CHANGES TO THE
 PROJECT.
  
  
 SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
  
 1.) PER ZLDR SECTION 94-145(11), THE FAR INCLUDES
 AIR-CONDITIONED OR FULLY ENCLOSED STORAGE SPACES,
 ENCLOSED AREAS ON THE ROOFTOP SUCH AS BATHROOMS AND
 LOBBIES, STAIRS AND ELEVATOR AREAS, AND EXTERNAL
 UNENCLOSED CIRCULATION AREAS. THE FLOOR AREA RATIO
 (FAR) CALCULATION FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT APPEARS TO
 BE INCORRECT, AS CERTAIN SPACES (I.E. STAIRS,
 ELEVATORS, ETC.) HAVE BEEN EXCLUDED FROM THE FAR (AS
 PROVIDED IN THE SITE DATA NOTES). THE FAR CANNOT EXCEED
 1.5. PLEASE ADDRESS. [ZLDR S.94-243, TABLE VIII-3]
  
 2.) WHAT IS THE SETBACK DISTANCE FROM THE EXTENT OF THE
 UNDERGROUND GARAGE TO THE PROPERTY LINE? THE
 UNDERGROUND GARAGE SEEMS TO EXTEND CLOSER TO THE
 PROPERTY LINE THAN THE ABOVE GROUND STRUCTURES FOR BOTH
 BUILDINGS AND NO DIMENSIONS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED FOR THIS
 SETBACK. THE UNDERGROUND STRUCTURE IS A PART OF THE
 BUILDING AND THEREFORE, THE SETBACKS SHALL BE MEASURED
 FROM THE EXTENT OF THE UNDERGROUND GARAGE (CLOSEST
 POINT) TO THE PROPERTY LINES.
  
 3.) PARKING/LOADING CONFIGURATION WHICH REQUIRE BACKING
 DIRECTLY ONTO A STREET FROM A PARKING OR LOADING SPACE
 FOR MORE THAN TWO (2) RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND ALL
 NON-RESIDENTIAL USES SHALL BE PROHIBITED IN ALL
 RESIDENTIAL AND NON-RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS. THE
 LOADING AREA WITHIN THE EL FLAMINGO BUILDING SEEM TO
 REQUIRE VEHICLES TO BACK OUT INTO THESE PROHIBITED
 ZONES. PLEASE ADDRESS. [ZLDR S.94-485(J)(1)]
  
 4.) ARE THE IMPROVEMENTS ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY
 CONSISTENT WITH THE SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY CORRIDOR
 IMPROVEMENT PLAN? PLEASE MEET WITH THE CITY'S
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT TO COORDINATE AND
 ADDRESS.
  
 5.) STAFF IS REQUESTING THE APPLICANT ACCOMMODATE AN 8
 FT. HIGH CONCRETE WALL ALONG THE REAR PROPERTY LINES OF
 BOTH PARCELS (EL FLAMINGO AND EL CORDOVA) TO HELP
 MITIGATE THE IMPACT OF THE PROJECT NEXT TO THE EXISTING
 RESIDENTIAL USES.
  
 6.) THE PROPOSED VALET BULLPEN SEEMS TO BE IN CONFLICT
 WITH THE DESIGNATED LANES FOR INTERNAL CIRCULATION.
 PLEASE ADDRESS.
  
 7.) THE CIVIL PLAN SHOWS THE LOCATION OF WATER METERS
 NEAR THE ACCESS/EXIT POINTS OF THE BUILDINGS. PLEASE
 SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE WATER METERS IN THE PLAN AND
 PROVIDE A DETAIL. THE DETAIL IS REQUIRED TO ENSURE THAT
 THE METER(S) WILL NOT IMPACT VISIBILITY AND APPROPRIATE
 SCREENING MEASURES ARE IMPLEMENTED.
  
 8.) HOW FAR DO THE BALCONIES EXTEND INTO THE
 SETBACK(S)? BALCONIES CANNOT ENCROACH MORE THAN 3 FT.
 INTO ANY SETBACK. PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS TO
 DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENCY. [ZLDR S.94-305(B)(2)]
  
 9.) ALL ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (I.E. HVAC
 EQUIPMENT) SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW. PLEASE PROVIDE
 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION/ILLUSTRATION TO HOW THE PROJECT
 WILL COMPLY WITH THIS REQUIREMENT.
  
 10.) THE EXISTING USE WEST OF THE EL FLAMINGO BUILDING
 IS A PRIVATE SCHOOL (NOT AUTO SALES, AS SPECIFIED IN
 THE PLAN). PLEASE ADDRESS FOR ACCURACY.
  
 11.) THE EXISTING USES WEST OF THE EL CORDOVA BUILDING
 SEEMS TO BE AN ART GALLERY AND RESTAURANT, AND PARKING
 LOT ASSOCIATED WITH THE GREENE SCHOOL. PLEASE ADDRESS
 FOR ACCURACY.
  
 12.) PLEASE LABEL ALL BUILDING SETBACKS IN THE PLAN.
  
 13.) A STALL STRIPING DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE
 PLAN.
  
 14.) BICYCLE PARKING IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO ZLDR
 S.94-485(9). PLEASE ADDRESS. A BICYCLE PARKING DETAIL
 IS ALSO REQUIRED IN THE PLAN.
  
 15.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE SITE DATA
 TABULAR: APPLICATION NUMBER: PB 1712C/Z19050024;
 RECALCULATION OF FAR REQUIRED; PROPOSED NUMBER OF
 DWELLING UNITS FOR THE PROJECT IS 58 (NOT 56);
 RECALCULATION OF REQUIRED AND PROPOSED PARKING
 REQUIRED. THE PARKING CALCULATIONS SEEM TO BE
 INCORRECT. ADDITIONALLY, THE PARKING COUNT DOES NOT
 MATCH THE PARKING CALCULATIONS PROVIDED IN THE
 ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS; PROPOSED PARKING SHOULD INCLUDE
 THE VALET PARKING CALCULATIONS (SINCE IT WILL NOT COUNT
 TOWARDS REQUIRED PARKING); PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING FOR
 THE PROJECT; PROVIDE THE LANDSCAPE/PERVIOUS SURFACE
 AREA CALCULATION (REQUIRED AND PROPOSED) IN SQUARE
 FEET; RECALCULATE LOADING SPACE REQUIREMENT. SEEMS TO
 BE INCORRECT; CHECK THE NUMBER OF BUILDING STORIES
 PROVIDED IN THE TABULAR (TABLE INDICATE 7 STORIES.
 HOWEVER, PLANS SEEM TO SHOW 4 STORIES ABOVE GROUND).
  
 16.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS TABULAR: PER ZLDR ARTICLE VIII, THE MINIMUM
 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE REQUIREMENT IS 85% (NOT 80%). THIS
 MAY IMPACT THE WAIVER REQUEST FOR THE IMPERVIOUS
 SURFACE REQUIREMENT; THE LANGUAGE IN THE NOTE AT THE
 BOTTOM OF THE TABLE IS NOT CONSISTENT.
  
 17.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE
 SETBACKS/SEPARATIONS TABULAR: REQUIRED SETBACK
 CALCULATIONS ARE INCORRECT. THIS NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED
 AS IT WILL IMPACT THE WAIVER REQUESTS TO THE REQUIRED
 SETBACKS; IT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A LEGEND TO
 IDENTIFY WHAT "N" AND "S" MEANS.
  
 18.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE WAIVER CHART:
 REQUIRED SETBACKS ARE INCORRECT AND WILL NEED TO BE
 CORRECTED AS IT WILL IMPACT THE WAIVERS REQUESTED; THE
 REQUIRED MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA IS 85% (NOT
 80%). CALCULATIONS WILL NEED TO BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY.
  
 19.) THE SITE DATA TABULAR INDICATES A TOTAL OF THREE
 (3) LOADING ZONES PROVIDED; HOWEVER, ONLY TWO (2) HAVE
 BEEN COUNTED IN THE PLAN. PLEASE ADDRESS.
  
 20.) SHOW THE WIDTH OF THE ROADWAY FOR ALL PUBLIC
 STREETS IN THE PLAN (I.E. FLAMINGO, BARCELONA, CORDOVA,
 ETC.)
  
  
 ARCHITECTURAL (FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS):
  
 1.) PROVIDE PLANS ILLUSTRATING WHAT SPACES IN THE
 PROPOSED BUILDINGS ARE COUNTED IN THE FAR CALCULATIONS
 (I.E. USE SHADING/HATCHING, ETC.); ALSO PROVIDE THE
 DETAILED CALCULATIONS FOR EACH FLOOR.
  
 2.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE PARKING GARAGE
 PLANS (SHEETS A-1.07 AND A-1.08): PARKING CALCULATIONS
 SEEM TO BE INCORRECT; DIMENSION OUT THE STALLS, AISLES,
 WALKWAYS AND DRIVE AISLES; THERE SEEMS TO BE MORE
 COMPACT PARKING SPACES COUNTED THEN NOTED IN THE PLANS;
 DIMENSION OUT THE 2 FT. CURB OVERHANG; ARE WHEEL STOPS
 PROVIDED FOR THE STALLS? IF SO, PLEASE ILLUSTRATE; PER
 ZLDR S.94-485(O), ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE
 LOCATED SO THAT USERS ARE NOT COMPELLED TO WALK OR
 OTHERWISE MOVE BEHIND A PARKED VEHICLE. THE LOCATION OF
 THE PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES WITHIN THE
 UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE REQUIRES APPROVAL FROM THE
 BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
  
 3.) A DETAILED EXPLANATION IS NEEDED ON HOW THE PARKING
 GARAGE WILL FUNCTION FOR THE RESIDENTS AND
 NON-RESIDENTS OF THE PROJECT, SPECIFICALLY: THERE ARE A
 NUMBER OF TANDEM PARKING SPACES WHICH SEEM ONLY
 REASONABLE FOR THE OCCUPANTS OF THE BUILDING(S) TO
 UTILIZE. HOW WILL THESE SPACES BE RESERVED/IDENTIFIED
 FOR RESIDENTIAL PARKING ONLY, ETC.; PLEASE ENSURE THAT
 THERE IS SUFFICIENT PARKING FOR EACH USE (I.E. THEATRE,
 RETAIL, RESTAURANT) THAT WILL BE ACCESSIBLE TO THE
 PATRONS/GENERAL PUBLIC (I.E. EXCESS TO THE TANDEM
 PARKING). STAFF?S PARKING CALCULATION SEEM TO INDICATE
 THAT THERE IS INSUFFICIENT PARKING FOR THE COMMERCIAL
 USES.
  
 4.) WHAT IS THE OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHT FOR THE EL
 CORDOVA BUILDING? THERE SEEMS TO BE A DISCREPANCY
 WITHIN THE PLANS (I.E. IS IT 64.67 FT. PER SHEET A-2.01
 OR IS IT 68.67 FT. PER SHEET A-3.01). PLEASE CLARIFY AS
 THE BUILDING HEIGHT MAY IMPACT THE REQUIRED SETBACKS
 FOR THE BUILDING.
  
 5.) WHAT IS THE HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED DECORATIVE
 FINIALS. DECORATIVE FEATURES MAY NOT EXCEED THE
 DISTRICT HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS BY 10%. [ZLDR S.94-306]
  
 6.) PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY ARCHITECTURAL PLANS MOVING
 FORWARD TO A PUBLIC HEARING SHALL BE SIGNED, DATED AND
 SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT.
  
  
 SIGNAGE COMMENTS:
  
 1.) NO INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED ON SIGNAGE. PLEASE
 PROVIDE INFORMATION ON HOW SIGNAGE WILL BE HANDLED FOR
 THE PROJECT (I.E. SIGNAGE PROGRAM, ETC.).
  
  
 PHOTOMETRICS/LIGHTING PLAN COMMENTS:
  
 1.) ANY SOURCE OF ILLUMINATION LOCATED WITHIN A
 COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD) DISTRICT SHALL NOT
 EXCEED ONE-FOOT CANDLE AT OR BEYOND THE BOUNDARIES OF
 SUCH DEVELOPMENT. THE PROJECT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THIS
 REQUIREMENT. [ZLDR S.94-209(D)(8)]
  
 2.) THE PHOTOMETRICS HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED ALONG ALL
 BOUNDARIES (INSIDE AND OUT) OF THE PROJECT. PLEASE
 ADDRESS SO THAT STAFF CAN EVALUATE THE ILLUMINATION FOR
 CONSISTENCY WITH THE ZLDRS.
  
 3.) ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE
 GLARE AND SHALL BE ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE
 AWAY FROM ALL ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT
 RESIDENCES, OR PUBLIC THOROUGHFARE. PLEASE PROVIDE
 INFORMATION HOW THIS REQUIREMENT WILL BE ADDRESSED.
 [ZLDR S.94-309(A)]
  
  
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:
  
 * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 * CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF
 FIFTEEN (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5
 INCHES X 11 INCHES, AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17
 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600.00).
  
 * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE
 QUESTIONS.
  
  

  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved