 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z19050024
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z19050024 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-21-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
08-21-2020 |
Time |
21:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
08-21-2020 |
Time |
21:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-08-21 21:05:04 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | THE 7/24/20 COMMENT REPONSE LETTER FROM SCHMIDT NICHOLS | | | STATES THAT THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WILL BE FULLY | | | ADDRESSED DURING PERMIT REVIEW AS THE "CURRENT DRAWING | | | INDICATES A SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF THE INTENDED SOLUTION | | | AND WILL BE RESOLVED DURING THE DESIGN DEVELOPMENT | | | PHASE WITHIN THE CONFINES OF THE FINAL THEATER DESIGN": | | | | | | EGRESS FROM THEATER. | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: SECOND FLOOR PLAN A-1.02 SHOWS A LONG | | | NARROW STAIR FLIGHT LOCATED BETWEEN CINEMA 5 AND CINEMA | | | 6 BUT THE STAIR DOES NOT SEEM TO LINE UP WITH THE | | | LOCATION AND CONFIGURATION OF THE STAIR SHOWN ON FIRST | | | FLOOR PLAN A1.01 OR MEZZANINE LEVEL PLAN A-1.01A. | | | COMMENT ON SECOND REVIEW: THE LONG NARROW STAIR LOCATED | | | BETWEEN CINEMA 5 AND CINEMA 6 SEEMS TO PROVIDE EGRESS | | | FROM THE PROJECTOR BOOTH CATWALK LEVEL ABOVE THE | | | THEATER LOBBY, BUT THE PLANS DO NOT SEEM TO SHOW WHERE | | | THAT STAIR COMES OUT (THE EXIT DISCHARGE) AT 1ST FLOOR | | | LEVEL. THE STAIR IS STILL NOT SHOWN ON FIRST FLOOR PLAN | | | A1.01 OR MEZZANINE LEVEL PLAN A-1.01A. | | | COMMENT ON REVISED PLANS SUBMITTED 12/20/19: THE EXIT | | | STAIR FROM CATWALK IS NOW SHOWN TO DISCHARGE TO THE | | | OUTSIDE BALCONY. IN FACT, THERE ARE NUMEROUS EXIT DOORS | | | SHOWN AS DISCHARGING TO THE OUTSIDE BALCONY (2ND FLOOR | | | LEVEL) BUT THERE IS NO EGRESS STAIR SHOWN TO TAKE | | | PEOPLE DOWN FROM THAT BALCONY SO THAT THEY CAN EXIT THE | | | BUILDING AT THE 1ST FLOOR. THE COMMENT RESPONSE LETTER | | | STATES THAT SHEET A1.02 SHOWS CONNECTION FROM THE STAIR | | | BETWEEN CINEMA 5 AND CINEMA 6, AND THE EXIT STAIR AT | | | 1ST FLOOR LEVEL UNDER THE CINEMA 6 UPPER PLATFORM. | | | THERE IS NO OPENING SHOWN IN THE WALL BETWEEN THE TWO | | | STAIRS AND, IF AN EGRESS STAIR SERVES THE OUTSIDE | | | BALCONY, NO SUCH CONNECTION IS NEEDED FOR THE | | | OCCUPANT(S) OF THE PROJECTOR BOOTH CATWALK. | | | | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-15-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
01-15-2020 |
Time |
18:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
01-15-2020 |
Time |
18:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-01-15 18:55:52 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | THE COMMENT NUMBERING FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW HAS BEEN | | | MAINTAINED IN THE REVIEW BELOW. | | | | | | 5. EGRESS FROM THEATER. | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: SECOND FLOOR PLAN A-1.02 SHOWS A LONG | | | NARROW STAIR FLIGHT LOCATED BETWEEN CINEMA 5 AND CINEMA | | | 6 BUT THE STAIR DOES NOT SEEM TO LINE UP WITH THE | | | LOCATION AND CONFIGURATION OF THE STAIR SHOWN ON FIRST | | | FLOOR PLAN A1.01 OR MEZZANINE LEVEL PLAN A-1.01A. | | | COMMENT ON SECOND REVIEW: THE LONG NARROW STAIR LOCATED | | | BETWEEN CINEMA 5 AND CINEMA 6 SEEMS TO PROVIDE EGRESS | | | FROM THE PROJECTOR BOOTH CATWALK LEVEL ABOVE THE | | | THEATER LOBBY, BUT THE PLANS DO NOT SEEM TO SHOW WHERE | | | THAT STAIR COMES OUT (THE EXIT DISCHARGE) AT 1ST FLOOR | | | LEVEL. THE STAIR IS STILL NOT SHOWN ON FIRST FLOOR PLAN | | | A1.01 OR MEZZANINE LEVEL PLAN A-1.01A. | | | COMMENT ON REVISED PLANS SUBMITTED 12/20/19: THE EXIT | | | STAIR FROM CATWALK IS NOW SHOWN TO DISCHARGE TO THE | | | OUTSIDE BALCONY. IN FACT, THERE ARE NUMEROUS EXIT DOORS | | | SHOWN AS DISCHARGING TO THE OUTSIDE BALCONY (2ND FLOOR | | | LEVEL) BUT THERE IS NO EGRESS STAIR SHOWN TO TAKE | | | PEOPLE DOWN FROM THAT BALCONY SO THAT THEY CAN EXIT THE | | | BUILDING AT THE 1ST FLOOR. THE COMMENT RESPONSE LETTER | | | STATES THAT SHEET A1.02 SHOWS CONNECTION FROM THE STAIR | | | BETWEEN CINEMA 5 AND CINEMA 6, AND THE EXIT STAIR AT | | | 1ST FLOOR LEVEL UNDER THE CINEMA 6 UPPER PLATFORM. | | | THERE IS NO OPENING SHOWN IN THE WALL BETWEEN THE TWO | | | STAIRS AND, IF AN EGRESS STAIR SERVES THE OUTSIDE | | | BALCONY, NO SUCH CONNECTION IS NEEDED FOR THE | | | OCCUPANT(S) OF THE PROJECTOR BOOTH CATWALK. | | | | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-06-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
12-06-2019 |
Time |
14:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
12-06-2019 |
Time |
14:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-12-06 15:10:13 | THE SUBMITTED COMMENT RESPONSE LETTER SIMPLY STATES | | | "ACKNOWLEDGED" FOR ALL COMMENTS EXCEPT COMMENT 7 FOR | | | WHICH THE RESPONSE IS "THIS WILL BE ADDRESSED AT FINAL | | | DESIGN IN BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW". SO THERE IS NO | | | NARRATIVE TO STATE HOW THE COMMENTS ARE BEING | | | ADDRESSED. IF THE PLANNER IS OK WITH DEFERRING | | | RESPONSES ALL COMMENTS CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH THE | | | BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION, HOWEVER RESPONSE TO | | | COMMENTS 2, 3 AND 5, ARE MOSTLY LIKELY TO AFFECT THE | | | SITE PLAN APPROVAL. | | | | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THE COMMENT NUMBERING FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW HAS | | | BEEN MAINTAINED IN THE REVIEW BELOW. THOSE COMMENTS | | | THAT HAVE BEEN "ACKNOWLEDGED" AND CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH | | | THE PERMIT APPLICATION HAVE BEEN OMITTED FROM THIS 2ND | | | REVIEW. | | | | | | 2. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: GARAGE PARKING LEVEL PLANS A-107 AND | | | A-108 SHOW REGULAR PARKING SPACES LOCATED CLOSER TO THE | | | ELEVATORS THAN THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES IN THE | | | FLAMINGO DRIVE PARKING GARAGE. PER SECTION 208.3 OF | | | FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES | | | ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF | | | TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE. | | | THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL COMPLY | | | WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE. | | | COMMENT ON REVISED PLANS: THE FLAMINGO DRIVE PARKING | | | GARAGE IS SHOWN AS HAVING A TOTAL OF 270 PARKING SPACES | | | (134 ON LEVEL 1 AND 136 ON LEVEL 2) BUT ONLY 4 | | | ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE SHOWN. PER SECTION 208.2 | | | OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, 7 ACCESSIBLE PARKING | | | SPACES ARE REQUIRED. THERE ARE STILL REGULAR PARKING | | | SPACES THAT ARE CLOSER TO THE ELEVATORS THAN THE | | | PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PER SECTION 208.3 | | | OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING | | | SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE | | | OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE | | | ENTRANCE. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL | | | COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE. | | | | | | 3. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. | | | PLEASE INDICATE THE VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ON | | | THE PLANS. THIS IS THE ORIGINAL COMMENT: PER SECTION | | | 208.2.4 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX | | | REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING | | | STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND DESIGNED IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY | | | CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT | | | SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE) | | | | | | 5. EGRESS FROM THEATER LOBBY. | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: SECOND FLOOR PLAN A-1.02 SHOWS A LONG | | | NARROW STAIR FLIGHT LOCATED BETWEEN CINEMA 5 AND CINEMA | | | 6 BUT THE STAIR DOES NOT SEEM TO LINE UP WITH THE | | | LOCATION AND CONFIGURATION OF THE STAIR SHOWN ON FIRST | | | FLOOR PLAN A1.01 OR MEZZANINE LEVEL PLAN A-1.01A. | | | COMMENT ON REVISED PLANS: THE LONG NARROW STAIR LOCATED | | | BETWEEN CINEMA 5 AND CINEMA 6 SEEMS TO PROVIDE EGRESS | | | FROM THE PROJECTOR BOOTH CATWALK LEVEL ABOVE THE | | | THEATER LOBBY, BUT THE PLANS DO NOT SEEM TO SHOW WHERE | | | THAT STAIR COMES OUT (THE EXIT DISCHARGE) AT 1ST FLOOR | | | LEVEL. THE STAIR IS STILL NOT SHOWN ON FIRST FLOOR PLAN | | | A1.01 OR MEZZANINE LEVEL PLAN A-1.01A. | | | | | | 8. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, | | | GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND | | | OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS, | | | SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 9. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND | | | CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF | | | CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. | | | | | | 10. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER | | | AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY, | | | INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE | | | CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION | | | THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY. | | | | | | 11. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT | | | TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE | | | ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP | | | ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC | | | PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-11-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
06-11-2019 |
Time |
21:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
06-11-2019 |
Time |
21:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-06-11 21:45:15 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. GARAGE | | | PARKING LEVEL PLANS A-107 AND A-108 SHOW REGULAR | | | PARKING SPACES LOCATED CLOSER TO THE ELEVATORS THAN THE | | | ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES IN THE FLAMING DRIVE PARKING | | | GARAGE. PER SECTION 208.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY | | | CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON | | | THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT | | | PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE. THE DESIGN OF | | | ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 | | | OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE | | | | | | 3. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PER SECTION 208.2.4 | | | OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX | | | REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING | | | STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND DESIGNED IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY | | | CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT | | | SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE) | | | | | | 4. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR | | | THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, | | | AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 5. EGRESS FROM THEATER LOBBY. SECOND FLOOR PLAN A-10.2 | | | SHOWS A LONG NARROW STAIR FLIGHT LOCATED BETWEEN CINEMA | | | 5 AND CINEMA 6 BUT THE STAIR DOES NOT SEEM TO LINE UP | | | WITH THE LOCATION AND CONFIGURATION OF THE STAIR SHOWN | | | ON FIRST FLOOR PLAN A1.01 OR MEZZANINE LEVEL PLAN | | | A-1.01A. | | | | | | 6. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES | | | NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO | | | MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL | | | BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE | | | EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED | | | TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR | | | OTHER APPROVED METHODS. | | | | | | 7. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE | | | REQUIRED. PLEASE CONTACT JEFFREY ODOMS, UTILITIES O&M | | | SUPERINTENDENT, PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT, FATS OILS | | | AND GREASE DIVISION, AT (561) 822-2172, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | 8. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, | | | GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND | | | OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS, | | | SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 9. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND | | | CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF | | | CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. | | | | | | 10. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER | | | AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY, | | | INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE | | | CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION | | | THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY. | | | | | | 11. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT | | | TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE | | | ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP | | | ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC | | | PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
10-01-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
10-01-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
10-01-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-23-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
09-23-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
09-23-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-09-23 16:42:52 | COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES | | | CUSTOMER SERVICE, [email protected] OR 561-822-2262: | | | | | | RESPONSE TO PRIOR COMMENT DOES NOT MAKE SENSE: | | | | | | 2.) RECORDED BACKFLOW COVENANTS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR | | | ANY FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES LOCATED INSIDE | | | BUILDINGS. MARK HURLEY CAN ASSIST WITH THAT PROCESS. | | | | | | RESPONSE: LIMITED IRRIGATION WATER WILL BE SOURCED FROM | | | THE PROPOSED POTABLE METER. FINAL METER SIZING WILL BE | | | COORDINATED AS PART OF THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS / | | | PERMIT SUBMITTALS. | | | NEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | -PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT MAY NOT BE LOCATED UNDER GUY | | | WIRES. THIS LOOKS TO BE THE CASE AT BARCELONA. IF SO, | | | PLEASE RELOCATE. | | | | | | -DURING ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, VERIFY PROPOSED FIRE | | | HYDRANT AT CORDOVA HAS NO CLEARANCE ISSUES WITH STREET | | | SIGNS. IF CONFLICT EXISTS, LOCATION WILL NEED TO BE | | | ADJUSTED. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-13-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
08-13-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
08-13-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-08-13 11:05:24 | COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, | | | [email protected], 561-494-1098: | | | | | | FOR ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL: | | | | | | SHOW ADJACENT ADDRESSES ON FLAMINGO RD. WHERE UTILITIES | | | ARE BEING REPLACED. | | | ADD CITY OF WPB PAVEMENT RESTORATION NOTE. | | | SHOW LENGTH OF PROPOSED UTILITIES IN ROW. | | | SHOW PROFILE/CLEARANCES AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. | | | IDENTIFY ALL PROPOSED SANITARY TIE-INS. | | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | CONCERNS, THANKS. | | | | | | | | | COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES | | | CUSTOMER SERVICE, [email protected] OR 561-822-2262: | | | | | | -RECORDED BACKFLOW COVENANTS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ANY | | | FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES LOCATED INSIDE BUILDINGS. | | | MARK HURLEY CAN ASSIST WITH THAT PROCESS ? | | | [email protected] | | | -RECOMMEND DRAINS BE INSTALLED IN FIRE ROOMS CONTAINING | | | FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES. | | | -WILL IRRIGATION WATER BE USED FROM THE WATER SERVICES? | | | IF SO, PLEASE ADD TO DEMAND CALCULATION AND VERIFY | | | WATER SERVICES ARE SUFFICIENT. | | | -ON FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL LABEL THE POINT OF | | | SERVICE GATE VALVES FOR EACH FIRELINE WATER SERVICE. | | | -RELOCATE GATE VALVES THAT ARE LOCATED IN THE PATH OF | | | PEDESTRIAN FOOT TRAFFIC AND DOORS. | | | -ARE ANY FIRE HYDRANTS PROPOSED TO BE INSTALLED? | | | -RECOMMEND DUAL/PARALLEL BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES TO REDUCE | | | OUTAGES DURING BACKFLOW MAINTENANCE. | | | -THE FOOTPRINT OF THE WATER SERVICES, METERS, AND | | | BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES MAY GET MUCH LARGER IF THEY ARE | | | SIZED 3? OR GREATER. IF 3 IN. OR LARGER, USE THE | | | ABOVE-GROUND STANDARD DETAIL. | | | -IF THE WATER MAIN ON DIXIE IS 12 IN., WPB UTILITIES | | | ENGINEER MAY PROVIDE MORE REQUIREMENTS AND DIRECTION. | | | -WILL THE BUILDINGS BETWEEN BARCELONA AND FLAMINGO BE | | | FED BY ONE DOMESTIC WATER METER, OR ARE WATER SERVICES | | | MISSING FROM PLAN? | | | -EXISTING WATER SERVICE TO PROPERTY WILL NEED TO BE | | | IDENTIFIED ON ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL AND LABELED WITH | | | WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THEM. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-07-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
01-07-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
01-07-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-01-07 15:38:22 | PREVIOUS PROVISOS NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | PLEASE ADD ADDRESS TO PLANS. | | | | | | PROVIDE LENGTHS IN FEET OF PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER | | | LINES . | | | | | | LABEL MATERIAL AND SIZE OF EXISTING WATER AND SEWER | | | LINES PROPOSED TO BE TAPPED FOR UTILITY SERVICES. | | | | | | PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND | | | STORMWATER PIPES ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE. | | | | | | PLEASE CONFIRM THAT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST WAS | | | SUBMITTED FOR ALL CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED | | | UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE | | | EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF | | | UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE | | | CONTACT JANICE TARBILL IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES | | | DEPARTMENT AT [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR | | | FURTHER ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR | | | INFORMATION ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING | | | FIELD SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC. | | | | | | PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF | | | ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES, | | | INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND | | | SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, | | | METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE | | | SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING | | | GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, | | | ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL | | | INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER | | | LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE | | | PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN | | | VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. ADDITIONALLY, | | | PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED | | | UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, | | | ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION | | | FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE | | | AND CLEARANCES AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. ALL PROPOSED | | | WATER MAIN SHALL BE SHOWN IN A PROFILE VIEW. | | | | | | SHOW VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION INFORMATION | | | (NAVD 88 AND NGVD 29). | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND | | | IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED | | | AREAS. | | | | | | PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR | | | PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS. | | | | | | COORDINATE PROPOSED LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND METER | | | PLACEMENTS DIRECTLY WITH MARK HURLEY, CITY OF WPB | | | PUBLIC WORKS CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, AT | | | 561-822-2262 OR [email protected] | | | | | | FOR ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE DETAILED BLOW-UP ON | | | PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW | | | PREVENTION. PROVIDE UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS | | | FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO PROPOSED UTILITIES INCLUDING | | | WATER METERS. | | | | | | PLANS ARE DIFFICULT TO READ. PLEASE PROVIDE SEPARATE | | | DRAINAGE AND WATER/SEWER PLAN SHEETS. | | | | | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | CONCERNS, THANKS. | | | | | | RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES | | | DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR WPB, FL 33401 (MAILING | | | ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 MOBILE: (561) 246-9525 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
10-11-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
10-11-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
10-11-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-10-11 09:26:14 | PASSED WITH PROVISOS: | | | | | | PLEASE INCLUDE CALCULATIONS ON ENGINEERING UTILITY | | | PLANS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & | | | SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW | | | DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR SEWER | | | AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER. | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER | | | ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE. | | | | | | PLEASE CONFIRM THAT A SUBMITTAL FOR A FORMAL AS-BUILT | | | REQUEST WAS MADE FOR ALL CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED | | | UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE | | | EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF YOUR PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF | | | UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE | | | CONTACT JANICE TARBILL IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES | | | DEPARTMENT AT [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR | | | FURTHER ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR | | | INFORMATION ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING | | | FIELD SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC. | | | | | | ENGINEERING PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND | | | DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND | | | SEWER LINES, INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR | | | WATER AND SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL | | | VALVES, METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON | | | THE SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING | | | GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, | | | ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL | | | INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER | | | LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE | | | PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN | | | VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. ADDITIONALLY, | | | PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED | | | UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, | | | ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION | | | FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE | | | AND CLEARANCES AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. ALL PROPOSED | | | WATER MAIN SHALL BE SHOWN IN A PROFILE VIEW. | | | | | | PLEASE SHOW VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION | | | INFORMATION (NAVD 88 AND NGVD 29) ON ALL RELEVANT | | | ENGINEERING PLAN SHEETS. | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE PROJECT ADDRESS ON ENGINEERING PLAN | | | COVER SHEET. | | | | | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | CONCERNS, THANKS. | | | | | | RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX | | | 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 MOBILE: (561) 246-9525 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING | | | | | | MANNY GONZALEZ, SENIOR ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX | | | 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 DIRECT: (561) 494-1085 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 MOBILE: (561) 644-7301 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-07-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
06-07-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
2.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
06-07-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-06-07 08:32:22 | PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS WERE REVIEWED. THERE ARE VARIOUS | | | SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS NOT MET, SEE COMMENTS BELOW. | | | | | | PLEASE COORDINATE WITH MS. UYEN (WEN) DANG OF THE CITY | | | ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT REGARDING COORDINATION WITH THE | | | CITY?S SOUTH DIXIE IMPROVEMENT PLANS. | | | | | | PLEASE CONNECT ALL WATER SERVICES OFF OF S. DIXIE HWY. | | | IT IS UNACCEPTABLE TO CONNECT TO 20 INCH WATER MAIN ON | | | CORDOBA (SHOWN ON YOUR PLANS AS A 12 INCH WATER MAIN). | | | CONTACT CITY CAD GROUP FOR FDOT ASBUILTS FOR DIXIE HWY. | | | | | | THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF REGULATIONS | | | AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY AFFECT THE | | | DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND WASTEWATER | | | UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE DEVELOPMENT | | | PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK BELOW: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WPB_W | | | EBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FULL-P | | | ACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97B19 | | | 60045731D3658206F27451722716EF | | | THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE | | | FOUND HERE: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR | | | MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA, | | | CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08, ADOPTED SEPT. 22, | | | 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18) | | | CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL, | | | SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER | | | SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY. | | | | | | THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE | | | CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY | | | BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS, | | | BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION. | | | | | | PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED | | | DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM AND PEAK) | | | AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PER FAC | | | 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER. | | | | | | PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER ALONG | | | ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE. | | | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT | | | OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF YOUR | | | PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE | | | MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL | | | IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT | | | [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER | | | ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION | | | ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD | | | SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC. | | | | | | AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR | | | MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI | | | CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL | | | | | | PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF | | | ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES, | | | INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND | | | SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, | | | METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE | | | SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING | | | GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, | | | ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL | | | INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER | | | LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE | | | PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN | | | VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. ADDITIONALLY, | | | PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED | | | UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, | | | ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION | | | FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE | | | AND CLEARANCES AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. ALL PROPOSED | | | WATER MAIN SHALL BE SHOWN IN A PROFILE VIEW. | | | | | | SHOW VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION INFORMATION | | | (NAVD 88 AND NGVD 29). | | | | | | CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY | | | ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY | | | RIGHT OF WAY. | | | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE | | | DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB | | | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION). | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND | | | IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED | | | AREAS. | | | | | | PROVIDE UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY | | | PERSONNEL TO PROPOSED UTILITIES INCLUDING WATER METERS. | | | | | | PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS NEAR PROPERTY LINE FOR | | | PROPOSED SANITARY LATERALS. | | | | | | PROVIDE DETAILED BLOW-UP ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION | | | OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION. | | | | | | PLANS ARE DIFFICULT TO READ. PLEASE PROVIDE SEPARATE | | | DRAINAGE AND WATER/SEWER PLAN SHEETS. | | | | | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | CONCERNS, THANKS. | | | | | | RICK ROSSANO | | | PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 | | | MOBILE: (561) 246-9525 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING | | | | | | MANNY GONZALEZ | | | SENIOR ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1085 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 | | | MOBILE: (561) 644-7301 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING | | | | | | CENTRAL OPERATIONS CENTER (DISPATCH): | | | 24-HOUR EMERGENCY RESPONSE SERVICES TO PUBLIC | | | UTILITIES, PUBLIC WORKS, PARKS, ETC. 561-822-2210 | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-04-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
06-04-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
06-04-2019 |
Time |
12:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-06-04 13:08:29 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | 6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A, | | | PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE, | | | INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE | | | OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES) | | | | | | 7. THE SEPARATION AND OPENING PROTECTION BETWEEN THE | | | PARKING GARAGE AND OTHER OCCUPANCIES SHALL BE IN | | | ACCORDANCE AND COMPLIANCE WITH THE SPECIFIC AND MOST | | | STRINGENT PROVISION REQUIREMENT OF EITHER CHAPTER OF | | | THE FIRE CODE. | | | | | | 8. SMOKE ALARMS ARE REQUIRED IN EVERY SLEEPING ROOM AND | | | OUTSIDE OF THE SLEEPING ROOMS AND IN ALL LEVELS OF THE | | | DWELLING UNITS. THESE DETECTORS SHALL BE HARD WIRED AND | | | SHALL BE INTERCONNECTED TO ONE ANOTHER OR AS PER THE | | | APPLICABLE CODE.. | | | | | | 9. INTERIOR FINISH CLASSIFICATIONS FOR ALL WALLS AND | | | CEILINGS SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED ON THE SUBMITTED | | | BUILDING PERMIT PLAN. | | | | | | 10. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA | | | 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS | | | STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE | | | BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE | | | BEING CONSTRUCTED. | | | | | | SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, | | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU | | | PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION. | | | | | | FOR ANY PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE | | | PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES? | | | | | | PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004, | | | FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE | | | POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF | | | APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT, | | | CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR | | | AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER | | | SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA) | | | AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS | | | PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS. | | | | | | 11. A CLASS ?A? NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM | | | SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR EACH STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP | | | DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY | | | INSTALLATION. | | | | | | 12. ALL VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL FIRE SEPARATIONS FOR | | | THIS BUILDING SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND INDICATED | | | ON THE PLANS. | | | | | | 13. ALL FIRE RATED OPENING PROTECTIONS (FIRE DOORS AND | | | HARDWARE) SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND INDICATED IN | | | THE DOOR SCHEDULE. ALL DOORS THAT OPEN ONTO EXIT ACCESS | | | CORRIDORS SHALL BE AT LEAST 20 MINUTE FIRE RATED AND BE | | | EQUIPPED WITH SELF-CLOSING DEVICES THAT CAUSE THE DOOR | | | TO POSITIVELY LATCH WHEN CLOSED. THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL | | | BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND ILLUSTRATED ON THE DOOR | | | SCHEDULE. | | | | | | 14. PRESCRIPTIVE STRENGTH REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL | | | HANDRAILS AND GUARDRAILS FOR THE BUILDING SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED AND CLEARLY INDICATED ON THE PLANS. | | | | | | 15. ALL EXIT DISCHARGE LOCATIONS SHALL BE CLEARLY | | | ILLUSTRATED ON THE PLAN. | | | | | | 16. ALL ILLUMINATED EXIT SIGNS AND EMERGENCY LIGHTING | | | EQUIPMENT SHALL BE ILLUSTRATED ON THE PLAN. | | | | | | IF AN EMERGENCY POWER GENERATOR IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS | | | (ARE) THE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES? | | | | | | 17. FLAME SPREAD DETAILS ON ALL FOAM BACKED STUCCO TRIM | | | PLANNED FOR BUILDING SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR AND/OR | | | IDENTIFIED AND INDICATED ON THE PLAN. | | | | | | 18. ALL KITCHEN EQUIPMENT AND OPERATIONS SHALL COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 96, STANDARD FOR VENTILATION CONTROL AND FIRE | | | PROTECTION OF COMMERCIAL COOKING OPERATIONS. | | | EXTINGUISHMENT AND VENTILATION SYSTEM SHOP DRAWINGS | | | SHALL BE SUBMITTED SEPARATELY FOR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 19. HOW WILL THE ATRIUM ( THEATER LOBBY) BE PROTECTED | | | INCLUDING SMOKE MIGRATION CONTROL? | | | | | | ANY PROPOSED SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | NFPA 101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE | | | PROTECTION EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING: | | | | | | THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED, | | | INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204, | | | STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY | | | RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR | | | RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY | | | HAVING JURISDICTION. | | | | | | THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE | | | INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE | | | APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED | | | MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE | | | SYSTEM. | | | | | | ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL | | | INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.9. | | | | | | 20. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS | | | BUILDING. | | | | | | ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS, | | | PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS. | | | | | | 21. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7 | | | KEYWAY SYSTEM. | | | | | | ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S | | | EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA | | | B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS. | | | | | | ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN | | | WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL | | | LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET | | | MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER | | | ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN | | | AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE | | | IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION. | | | | | | 22. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER | | | LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | OCCUPANT LOADS FOR ALL SPACES SHALL BE DETERMINED AND | | | SUBMITTED WITH THE SUBMITTED PLAN AND WHEN APPROVED | | | THEY ARE REQUIRED TO BE POSTED WHERE APPLICABLE. | | | | | | THE POOL DECK IS LARGE WITH TWO(2) EXITS INDICATED. | | | PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE OCCUPANCY LOAD DOES NOT EXCEED | | | THE CAPACITY OF THESE TWO EXIT AND THAT A THIRD EXIT IS | | | NOT REQUIRED UNDER THE FFPC. | | | | | | 23. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED | | | ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE | | | BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND | | | FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET | | | OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER | | | ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES. | | | | | | A FIRE HYDRANT IS REQUIRED TO BE WITHIN 100' OF AN FDC. | | | | | | ALL FIRE DEPARTMENT SPRINKLER SYSTEM CONNECTIONS | | | (FDC,S) FOR THE PROJECT SHALL BE IDENTIFIED AND | | | COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | 24. GRILLS AND A FIRE PIT ARE INDICATED ON THE ROOF. | | | | | | CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL | | | IS REQUIRED TO ENSURE THE INSTALLATION IS COMPLIANT | | | WITH THE MANUFACTURES SPECIFICATIONS, PROTECTION OF THE | | | PUBLIC, SEPARATED FORM COMBUSTIBLES(INCLUDING PLANTS) | | | AND ARE WITHIN THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FIRE CODE. | | | | | | 25. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 26. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-30-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-30-2020 |
Time |
15:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-18-2020 |
Time |
15:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-09-30 15:57:12 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 2000 S DIXIE CAREFREE Z19050024 | | | SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN FOR THE | | | SITE AND SHOW TREE CANOPY MITIGATION REQUIRED AND | | | PROVIDED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING: | | | ? SATISFIED. IDENTIFY TREE #5 | | | ? SATISFIED. REMOVE ERM REFERENCES FORM MULTIPLE | | | LOCATIONS ON SHEET TD-1 AND REMOVE UNNECESSARY COLUMNS. | | | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COLUMNS ON THE | | | DISPOSITION CHART: CANOPY DIAMETER, TREE CATEGORY, TREE | | | CONDITION, AND SQUARE FOOTAGE MITIGATION DUE, AND | | | PROVIDE THE INFORMATION FOR EACH TREE IN EACH COLUMN. | | | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION DUE TOTAL AT THE | | | BOTTOM OF THE CHART. | | | ? SATISFIED. ADJUST JAPANESE BLUEBERRY CANOPY CREDIT TO | | | 150 SQ FT FOR CATEGORY 2. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. SUBMIT A LANDSCAPE PERMIT PLAN FOR 309 | | | BARCELONA MEETING THE MINIMUM CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR | | | RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPING AND MITIGATING FOR TREES | | | REMOVED. | | | A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED FOR | | | THE ADDITIONAL TREES REMOVED, AND THE PERMIT WAS ISSUED | | | WITH CONDITIONS. MITIGATION IS DUE FOR ALL THE TREES | | | REMOVED AND MUST BE ADDRESSED WITH REPLACEMENT OF TREES | | | ON SITE OR PAYMENT IN LIEU. THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPE | | | REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET ON SITE WITH A LANDSCAPE | | | PERMIT PLAN TO BE SUBMITTED. NO MITIGATION HAS BEEN | | | PROVIDED TO DATE FOR ANY TREES REMOVED FROM THE SITE. | | | | | | THIS IS THE FIRST REVIEW OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR 309 | | | BARCELONA. PER SECTION 94-448, ALL TREE REPLACEMENT | | | MUST BE ON THE SUBJECT SITE TO BE COUNTED TOWARD | | | MITIGATION DUE. THE 2 LIVE OAK TREES PROPOSED IN THE | | | RIGHT OF WAY CANNOT BE COUNTED UNLESS THEY ARE WITHIN | | | THE PROPERTY LINE, AS THIS PROPERTY IS SEPARATE FROM | | | THE CPD. | | | | | | THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT TP19-1785 THAT REPLACED | | | PERMIT TP 17-1618 EXPIRED ON APRIL 30, 2020.THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET LP-4 AND TREE DISPOSITION PLAN | | | SHEET TD-2 MUST BE SUBMITTED UNDER LANDSCAPE PERMIT | | | 18030706 IN ORDER FOR THIS COMMENT TO BE SATISFIED. | | | | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET LP-5 NEEDS BE SUBMITTED UNDER | | | PERMIT 18030706. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE AMENITY | | | DECKS IF INTENDED AS JUSTIFICATION FOR THE WAIVER | | | REQUESTS. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM TO | | | DEMONSTRATE THE AREAS PROVIDED AS OPEN SPACE AND | | | LANDSCAPE AREAS ON SITE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LINES TO | | | PROVIDE REFERENCE FOR THE WAIVER REQUESTS. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. WAIVER REQUESTS #7 AND 8 NEED TO BE | | | REVISED TO SHOW THAT 15% LANDSCAPE AREA IS REQUIRED PER | | | THE CURRENT CODE. | | | THERE IS AN ERROR ON THE CODE CHART THAT WILL BE | | | CORRECTED. MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS AREA IS 85%, THEREFORE | | | MINIMUM LANDSCAPE AREA IS 15%. | | | THE SITE PLAN NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED TO 15% PROPOSED | | | LANDSCAPE AREA IN THE SITE DATA CHART. THE PLAN OS-1 | | | COUNTS AREAS THAT ARE OVER THE PARKING GARAGE AS | | | PERVIOUS AREA, WHICH THEY DO NOT QUALIFY AS PERVIOUS | | | AREA. ADJUST THE PLAN AND THE NUMBERS IN THE WAIVER. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. WAIVER REQUEST #9 NEEDS TO REFERENCE | | | SECTION 94-443(A) BUFFERING OF NON-RESIDENTIAL USES | | | ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY FOR THE EAST BUFFERS | | | AND 94-443(D) ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS FOR | | | MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES FOR THE BUFFERS ADJACENT | | | TO PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE 10 FEET | | | IN WIDTH. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PROVIDE MEASUREMENTS AND CALCULATIONS FOR | | | THE BUFFER TREES REQUIRED FOR ALL BUFFER LENGTHS PER | | | SECTION 94-443 B. AND INDICATE HOW THIS WILL BE | | | AFFECTED THROUGH THE WAIVER REQUESTS. INDICATE THE | | | WIDTH OF ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS PROVIDED ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE STREET TREES THAT ARE NOT AFFECTED | | | BY OVERHEAD UTILITIES NEED TO BE UPGRADED TO CATEGORY 1 | | | SHADE TREES IF USED AS A JUSTIFICATION FOR WAIVERS. | | | | | | WAIVER IS FOR WIDTH OF BUFFER PROVIDED, PROVIDE A | | | REFERENCE OF THE NUMBER OF TREES THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED | | | ALONG EACH BUFFER SEGMENT AND COMPARE TO THE NUMBER | | | PROVIDED WITHIN EACH BUFFER AND ADJACENT RIGHT OF WAY. | | | OAKS CANNOT BE USED ON DIXIE, AS THERE ARE OVERHEAD | | | ELECTRIC LINES. | | | | | | LIVE OAKS ARE CATEGORY 1 TREES. PROVIDE THE REQUESTED | | | INFORMATION ON REQUIRED, PROVIDED AND THE DIFFERENCE | | | FOR THE NUMBER OF TREES AND THE AREA OF LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO | | | PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS | | | INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, | | | AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE | | | ROOTS. | | | SOME ROOT BARRIERS ARE SHOWN, BUT THERE ARE SEVERAL | | | SANITARY SEWER LINES SHOWN UNDER TREES ALONG DIXIE | | | CONNECTING FROM THE SEWER MAIN TO THE BUILDING. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL GROUND MOUNTED | | | EQUIPMENT INCLUDING FPL TRANSFORMERS, A/C UNITS, ETC., | | | AND PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT | | | AND UTILITIES. | | | LOCATIONS TO BE PROVIDED OR AREAS INDICATED ON THE PLAN | | | TO ACCOMMODATE REQUIRED EQUIPMENT. | | | GIVEN THE REQUEST FOR WAIVERS FOR LANDSCAPE AREA AND | | | JUSTIFICATION PROVIDED, THESE AREAS NEED TO BE PLANNED | | | FOR, AS SPACE IS LIMITED AND CANNOT BE CHANGED AFTER | | | APPROVAL OF WAIVERS. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/30/19: | | | 11. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE | | | TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR | | | RELOCATED. ONCE TREE#5 IS CORRECTLY IDENTIFIED, AND THE | | | CONDITION OF EACH TREE AND PALM ADDED, THE NUMBER OF | | | TREES AND PALMS REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED CAN BE | | | DETERMINED. | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION FOR ALL LANDSCAPE | | | WAIVERS. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/17/20: | | | 13. SATISFIED. TOTAL TREES REQUIRED OF 118 AS SHOWN ON | | | SHEET LP-5 MUST HAVE THE PROVIDED TREE COUNT BROKEN | | | DOWN INTO THE DIFFERENT AREAS. EACH PARCEL FOR ONSITE | | | TREES, ROOFTOP AND RIGHT OF WAY TREES. THIS WILL | | | PROVIDE AN EASILY REFERENCED CHART TO DEMONSTRATE WHERE | | | THE TREES ARE PROVIDED. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-18-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
08-18-2020 |
Time |
13:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
08-18-2020 |
Time |
13:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-08-18 13:31:42 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 2000 S DIXIE CAREFREE Z19050024 | | | AUGUST 17, 2020 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN FOR THE | | | SITE AND SHOW TREE CANOPY MITIGATION REQUIRED AND | | | PROVIDED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING: | | | ? SATISFIED. IDENTIFY TREE #5 | | | ? SATISFIED. REMOVE ERM REFERENCES FORM MULTIPLE | | | LOCATIONS ON SHEET TD-1 AND REMOVE UNNECESSARY COLUMNS. | | | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COLUMNS ON THE | | | DISPOSITION CHART: CANOPY DIAMETER, TREE CATEGORY, TREE | | | CONDITION, AND SQUARE FOOTAGE MITIGATION DUE, AND | | | PROVIDE THE INFORMATION FOR EACH TREE IN EACH COLUMN. | | | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION DUE TOTAL AT THE | | | BOTTOM OF THE CHART. | | | ? SATISFIED. ADJUST JAPANESE BLUEBERRY CANOPY CREDIT TO | | | 150 SQ FT FOR CATEGORY 2. | | | | | | 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SUBMIT A LANDSCAPE PERMIT PLAN | | | FOR 309 BARCELONA MEETING THE MINIMUM CODE REQUIREMENTS | | | FOR RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPING AND MITIGATING FOR TREES | | | REMOVED. | | | A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED FOR | | | THE ADDITIONAL TREES REMOVED, AND THE PERMIT WAS ISSUED | | | WITH CONDITIONS. MITIGATION IS DUE FOR ALL THE TREES | | | REMOVED AND MUST BE ADDRESSED WITH REPLACEMENT OF TREES | | | ON SITE OR PAYMENT IN LIEU. THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPE | | | REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET ON SITE WITH A LANDSCAPE | | | PERMIT PLAN TO BE SUBMITTED. NO MITIGATION HAS BEEN | | | PROVIDED TO DATE FOR ANY TREES REMOVED FROM THE SITE. | | | | | | THIS IS THE FIRST REVIEW OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR 309 | | | BARCELONA. PER SECTION 94-448, ALL TREE REPLACEMENT | | | MUST BE ON THE SUBJECT SITE TO BE COUNTED TOWARD | | | MITIGATION DUE. THE 2 LIVE OAK TREES PROPOSED IN THE | | | RIGHT OF WAY CANNOT BE COUNTED UNLESS THEY ARE WITHIN | | | THE PROPERTY LINE, AS THIS PROPERTY IS SEPARATE FROM | | | THE CPD. | | | | | | THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT TP19-1785 THAT REPLACED | | | PERMIT TP 17-1618 EXPIRED ON APRIL 30, 2020.THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET LP-4 AND TREE DISPOSITION PLAN | | | SHEET TD-2 MUST BE SUBMITTED UNDER LANDSCAPE PERMIT | | | 18030706 IN ORDER FOR THIS COMMENT TO BE SATISFIED. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE AMENITY | | | DECKS IF INTENDED AS JUSTIFICATION FOR THE WAIVER | | | REQUESTS. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM TO | | | DEMONSTRATE THE AREAS PROVIDED AS OPEN SPACE AND | | | LANDSCAPE AREAS ON SITE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LINES TO | | | PROVIDE REFERENCE FOR THE WAIVER REQUESTS. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. WAIVER REQUESTS #7 AND 8 NEED TO BE | | | REVISED TO SHOW THAT 15% LANDSCAPE AREA IS REQUIRED PER | | | THE CURRENT CODE. | | | THERE IS AN ERROR ON THE CODE CHART THAT WILL BE | | | CORRECTED. MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS AREA IS 85%, THEREFORE | | | MINIMUM LANDSCAPE AREA IS 15%. | | | THE SITE PLAN NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED TO 15% PROPOSED | | | LANDSCAPE AREA IN THE SITE DATA CHART. THE PLAN OS-1 | | | COUNTS AREAS THAT ARE OVER THE PARKING GARAGE AS | | | PERVIOUS AREA, WHICH THEY DO NOT QUALIFY AS PERVIOUS | | | AREA. ADJUST THE PLAN AND THE NUMBERS IN THE WAIVER. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. WAIVER REQUEST #9 NEEDS TO REFERENCE | | | SECTION 94-443(A) BUFFERING OF NON-RESIDENTIAL USES | | | ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY FOR THE EAST BUFFERS | | | AND 94-443(D) ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS FOR | | | MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES FOR THE BUFFERS ADJACENT | | | TO PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE 10 FEET | | | IN WIDTH. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PROVIDE MEASUREMENTS AND CALCULATIONS FOR | | | THE BUFFER TREES REQUIRED FOR ALL BUFFER LENGTHS PER | | | SECTION 94-443 B. AND INDICATE HOW THIS WILL BE | | | AFFECTED THROUGH THE WAIVER REQUESTS. INDICATE THE | | | WIDTH OF ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS PROVIDED ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE STREET TREES THAT ARE NOT AFFECTED | | | BY OVERHEAD UTILITIES NEED TO BE UPGRADED TO CATEGORY 1 | | | SHADE TREES IF USED AS A JUSTIFICATION FOR WAIVERS. | | | | | | WAIVER IS FOR WIDTH OF BUFFER PROVIDED, PROVIDE A | | | REFERENCE OF THE NUMBER OF TREES THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED | | | ALONG EACH BUFFER SEGMENT AND COMPARE TO THE NUMBER | | | PROVIDED WITHIN EACH BUFFER AND ADJACENT RIGHT OF WAY. | | | OAKS CANNOT BE USED ON DIXIE, AS THERE ARE OVERHEAD | | | ELECTRIC LINES. | | | | | | LIVE OAKS ARE CATEGORY 1 TREES. PROVIDE THE REQUESTED | | | INFORMATION ON REQUIRED, PROVIDED AND THE DIFFERENCE | | | FOR THE NUMBER OF TREES AND THE AREA OF LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO | | | PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS | | | INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, | | | AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE | | | ROOTS. | | | SOME ROOT BARRIERS ARE SHOWN, BUT THERE ARE SEVERAL | | | SANITARY SEWER LINES SHOWN UNDER TREES ALONG DIXIE | | | CONNECTING FROM THE SEWER MAIN TO THE BUILDING. | | | | | | 10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL GROUND | | | MOUNTED EQUIPMENT INCLUDING FPL TRANSFORMERS, A/C | | | UNITS, ETC., AND PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND | | | MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES. | | | LOCATIONS TO BE PROVIDED OR AREAS INDICATED ON THE PLAN | | | TO ACCOMMODATE REQUIRED EQUIPMENT. | | | GIVEN THE REQUEST FOR WAIVERS FOR LANDSCAPE AREA AND | | | JUSTIFICATION PROVIDED, THESE AREAS NEED TO BE PLANNED | | | FOR, AS SPACE IS LIMITED AND CANNOT BE CHANGED AFTER | | | APPROVAL OF WAIVERS. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/30/19: | | | 11. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE | | | TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR | | | RELOCATED. ONCE TREE#5 IS CORRECTLY IDENTIFIED, AND THE | | | CONDITION OF EACH TREE AND PALM ADDED, THE NUMBER OF | | | TREES AND PALMS REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED CAN BE | | | DETERMINED. | | | | | | 12. SATISFIED. PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION FOR ALL LANDSCAPE | | | WAIVERS. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/17/20: | | | 13. TOTAL TREES REQUIRED OF 118 AS SHOWN ON SHEET LP-5 | | | MUST HAVE THE PROVIDED TREE COUNT BROKEN DOWN INTO THE | | | DIFFERENT AREAS. EACH PARCEL FOR ONSITE TREES, ROOFTOP | | | AND RIGHT OF WAY TREES. THIS WILL PROVIDE AN EASILY | | | REFERENCED CHART TO DEMONSTRATE WHERE THE TREES ARE | | | PROVIDED. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-21-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
01-21-2020 |
Time |
09:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
01-21-2020 |
Time |
09:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-01-21 09:09:18 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 2000 S DIXIE CAREFREE Z19050024 | | | JANUARY 17, 2020 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN FOR THE | | | SITE AND SHOW TREE CANOPY MITIGATION REQUIRED AND | | | PROVIDED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING: | | | ? SATISFIED. IDENTIFY TREE #5 | | | ? SATISFIED. REMOVE ERM REFERENCES FORM MULTIPLE | | | LOCATIONS ON SHEET TD-1 AND REMOVE UNNECESSARY COLUMNS. | | | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COLUMNS ON THE | | | DISPOSITION CHART: CANOPY DIAMETER, TREE CATEGORY, TREE | | | CONDITION, AND SQUARE FOOTAGE MITIGATION DUE, AND | | | PROVIDE THE INFORMATION FOR EACH TREE IN EACH COLUMN. | | | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION DUE TOTAL AT THE | | | BOTTOM OF THE CHART. | | | ? SATISFIED. ADJUST JAPANESE BLUEBERRY CANOPY CREDIT TO | | | 150 SQ FT FOR CATEGORY 2. | | | | | | 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SUBMIT A LANDSCAPE PERMIT PLAN | | | FOR 309 BARCELONA MEETING THE MINIMUM CODE REQUIREMENTS | | | FOR RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPING AND MITIGATING FOR TREES | | | REMOVED. | | | A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED FOR | | | THE ADDITIONAL TREES REMOVED, AND THE PERMIT WAS ISSUED | | | WITH CONDITIONS. MITIGATION IS DUE FOR ALL THE TREES | | | REMOVED AND MUST BE ADDRESSED WITH REPLACEMENT OF TREES | | | ON SITE OR PAYMENT IN LIEU. THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPE | | | REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET ON SITE WITH A LANDSCAPE | | | PERMIT PLAN TO BE SUBMITTED. NO MITIGATION HAS BEEN | | | PROVIDED TO DATE FOR ANY TREES REMOVED FROM THE SITE. | | | | | | THIS IS THE FIRST REVIEW OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR 309 | | | BARCELONA. PER SECTION 94-448, ALL TREE REPLACEMENT | | | MUST BE ON THE SUBJECT SITE TO BE COUNTED TOWARD | | | MITIGATION DUE. THE 2 LIVE OAK TREES PROPOSED IN THE | | | RIGHT OF WAY CANNOT BE COUNTED UNLESS THEY ARE WITHIN | | | THE PROPERTY LINE, AS THIS PROPERTY IS SEPARATE FROM | | | THE CPD. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE AMENITY | | | DECKS IF INTENDED AS JUSTIFICATION FOR THE WAIVER | | | REQUESTS. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM TO | | | DEMONSTRATE THE AREAS PROVIDED AS OPEN SPACE AND | | | LANDSCAPE AREAS ON SITE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LINES TO | | | PROVIDE REFERENCE FOR THE WAIVER REQUESTS. | | | | | | 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. WAIVER REQUESTS #7 AND 8 NEED | | | TO BE REVISED TO SHOW THAT 15% LANDSCAPE AREA IS | | | REQUIRED PER THE CURRENT CODE. | | | THERE IS AN ERROR ON THE CODE CHART THAT WILL BE | | | CORRECTED. MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS AREA IS 85%, THEREFORE | | | MINIMUM LANDSCAPE AREA IS 15%. | | | THE SITE PLAN NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED TO 15% PROPOSED | | | LANDSCAPE AREA IN THE SITE DATA CHART. THE PLAN OS-1 | | | COUNTS AREAS THAT ARE OVER THE PARKING GARAGE AS | | | PERVIOUS AREA, WHICH THEY DO NOT QUALIFY AS PERVIOUS | | | AREA. ADJUST THE PLAN AND THE NUMBERS IN THE WAIVER. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. WAIVER REQUEST #9 NEEDS TO REFERENCE | | | SECTION 94-443(A) BUFFERING OF NON-RESIDENTIAL USES | | | ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY FOR THE EAST BUFFERS | | | AND 94-443(D) ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS FOR | | | MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES FOR THE BUFFERS ADJACENT | | | TO PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE 10 FEET | | | IN WIDTH. | | | | | | 7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE MEASUREMENTS AND | | | CALCULATIONS FOR THE BUFFER TREES REQUIRED FOR ALL | | | BUFFER LENGTHS PER SECTION 94-443 B. AND INDICATE HOW | | | THIS WILL BE AFFECTED THROUGH THE WAIVER REQUESTS. | | | INDICATE THE WIDTH OF ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS PROVIDED ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE STREET TREES THAT ARE NOT | | | AFFECTED BY OVERHEAD UTILITIES NEED TO BE UPGRADED TO | | | CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES IF USED AS A JUSTIFICATION FOR | | | WAIVERS. | | | | | | WAIVER IS FOR WIDTH OF BUFFER PROVIDED, PROVIDE A | | | REFERENCE OF THE NUMBER OF TREES THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED | | | ALONG EACH BUFFER SEGMENT AND COMPARE TO THE NUMBER | | | PROVIDED WITHIN EACH BUFFER AND ADJACENT RIGHT OF WAY. | | | OAKS CANNOT BE USED ON DIXIE, AS THERE ARE OVERHEAD | | | ELECTRIC LINES. | | | | | | LIVE OAKS ARE CATEGORY 1 TREES. PROVIDE THE REQUESTED | | | INFORMATION ON REQUIRED, PROVIDED AND THE DIFFERENCE | | | FOR THE NUMBER OF TREES AND THE AREA OF LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 9. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS | | | TO PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. | | | THIS INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND | | | CURBS, AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED | | | BY TREE ROOTS. | | | SOME ROOT BARRIERS ARE SHOWN, BUT THERE ARE SEVERAL | | | SANITARY SEWER LINES SHOWN UNDER TREES ALONG DIXIE | | | CONNECTING FROM THE SEWER MAIN TO THE BUILDING. | | | | | | 10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL GROUND | | | MOUNTED EQUIPMENT INCLUDING FPL TRANSFORMERS, A/C | | | UNITS, ETC., AND PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND | | | MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES. | | | LOCATIONS TO BE PROVIDED OR AREAS INDICATED ON THE PLAN | | | TO ACCOMMODATE REQUIRED EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/30/19: | | | 11. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE | | | TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR | | | RELOCATED. ONCE TREE#5 IS CORRECTLY IDENTIFIED, AND THE | | | CONDITION OF EACH TREE AND PALM ADDED, THE NUMBER OF | | | TREES AND PALMS REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED CAN BE | | | DETERMINED. | | | | | | 12. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION FOR ALL | | | LANDSCAPE WAIVERS. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-30-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
10-30-2019 |
Time |
16:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
10-30-2019 |
Time |
16:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-10-30 16:35:30 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 2000 S DIXIE CAREFREE Z19050024 | | | OCTOBER 30, 2019 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN | | | FOR THE SITE AND SHOW TREE CANOPY MITIGATION REQUIRED | | | AND PROVIDED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING: | | | ? IDENTIFY TREE #5 | | | ? REMOVE ERM REFERENCES FORM MULTIPLE LOCATIONS ON | | | SHEET TD-1 AND REMOVE UNNECESSARY COLUMNS. | | | ? PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COLUMNS ON THE DISPOSITION | | | CHART: CANOPY DIAMETER, TREE CATEGORY, TREE CONDITION, | | | AND SQUARE FOOTAGE MITIGATION DUE, AND PROVIDE THE | | | INFORMATION FOR EACH TREE IN EACH COLUMN. | | | ? PROVIDE THE MITIGATION DUE TOTAL AT THE BOTTOM OF THE | | | CHART. | | | ? ADJUST JAPANESE BLUEBERRY CANOPY CREDIT TO 150 SQ FT | | | FOR CATEGORY 2. | | | | | | 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SUBMIT A LANDSCAPE PERMIT PLAN | | | FOR 309 BARCELONA MEETING THE MINIMUM CODE REQUIREMENTS | | | FOR RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPING AND MITIGATING FOR TREES | | | REMOVED. | | | A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED FOR | | | THE ADDITIONAL TREES REMOVED, AND THE PERMIT WAS ISSUED | | | WITH CONDITIONS. MITIGATION IS DUE FOR ALL THE TREES | | | REMOVED AND MUST BE ADDRESSED WITH REPLACEMENT OF TREES | | | ON SITE OR PAYMENT IN LIEU. THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPE | | | REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET ON SITE WITH A LANDSCAPE | | | PERMIT PLAN TO BE SUBMITTED. NO MITIGATION HAS BEEN | | | PROVIDED TO DATE FOR ANY TREES REMOVED FROM THE SITE. | | | | | | 3. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE | | | AMENITY DECKS IF INTENDED AS JUSTIFICATION FOR THE | | | WAIVER REQUESTS. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM TO | | | DEMONSTRATE THE AREAS PROVIDED AS OPEN SPACE AND | | | LANDSCAPE AREAS ON SITE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LINES TO | | | PROVIDE REFERENCE FOR THE WAIVER REQUESTS. | | | | | | 5. NOT SATISFIED. WAIVER REQUESTS #7 AND 8 NEED TO BE | | | REVISED TO SHOW THAT 15% LANDSCAPE AREA IS REQUIRED PER | | | THE CURRENT CODE. | | | THERE IS AN ERROR ON THE CODE CHART THAT WILL BE | | | CORRECTED. MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS AREA IS 85%, THEREFORE | | | MINIMUM LANDSCAPE AREA IS 15%. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. WAIVER REQUEST #9 NEEDS TO REFERENCE | | | SECTION 94-443(A) BUFFERING OF NON-RESIDENTIAL USES | | | ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY FOR THE EAST BUFFERS | | | AND 94-443(D) ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS FOR | | | MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES FOR THE BUFFERS ADJACENT | | | TO PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE 10 FEET | | | IN WIDTH. | | | | | | 7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE MEASUREMENTS AND | | | CALCULATIONS FOR THE BUFFER TREES REQUIRED FOR ALL | | | BUFFER LENGTHS PER SECTION 94-443 B. AND INDICATE HOW | | | THIS WILL BE AFFECTED THROUGH THE WAIVER REQUESTS. | | | INDICATE THE WIDTH OF ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS PROVIDED ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE STREET TREES THAT ARE NOT | | | AFFECTED BY OVERHEAD UTILITIES NEED TO BE UPGRADED TO | | | CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES IF USED AS A JUSTIFICATION FOR | | | WAIVERS. | | | | | | WAIVER IS FOR WIDTH OF BUFFER PROVIDED, PROVIDE A | | | REFERENCE OF THE NUMBER OF TREES THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED | | | ALONG EACH BUFFER SEGMENT AND COMPARE TO THE NUMBER | | | PROVIDED WITHIN EACH BUFFER AND ADJACENT RIGHT OF WAY. | | | OAKS CANNOT BE USED ON DIXIE, AS THERE ARE OVERHEAD | | | ELECTRIC LINES. | | | | | | | | | 8. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 9. NOT SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO | | | PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS | | | INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, | | | AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE | | | ROOTS. | | | | | | 10. NOT SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL GROUND MOUNTED | | | EQUIPMENT INCLUDING FPL TRANSFORMERS, A/C UNITS, ETC., | | | AND PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT | | | AND UTILITIES. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 10/30/19: | | | 11. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES IN GOOD | | | CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. ONCE | | | TREE#5 IS CORRECTLY IDENTIFIED, AND THE CONDITION OF | | | EACH TREE AND PALM ADDED, THE NUMBER OF TREES AND PALMS | | | REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED CAN BE DETERMINED. | | | | | | 12. PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION FOR ALL LANDSCAPE WAIVERS. | | | | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-10-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
06-10-2019 |
Time |
17:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
06-10-2019 |
Time |
17:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-06-10 17:38:29 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 2000 S DIXIE CAREFREE Z19050024 | | | JUNE 10, 2019 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN FOR THE SITE, AND | | | SHOW TREE CANOPY MITIGATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED WITH | | | THIS PETITION. | | | | | | 2. SUBMIT A LANDSCAPE PERMIT PLAN FOR 309 BARCELONA | | | MEETING THE MINIMUM CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL | | | LANDSCAPING AND MITIGATING FOR TREES REMOVED. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE AMENITY DECKS IF | | | INTENDED AS JUSTIFICATION FOR THE WAIVER REQUESTS. | | | | | | 4. PROVIDE AN OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM TO DEMONSTRATE THE | | | AREAS PROVIDED AS OPEN SPACE AND LANDSCAPE AREAS ON | | | SITE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LINES TO PROVIDE REFERENCE FOR | | | THE WAIVER REQUESTS. | | | | | | 5. WAIVER REQUESTS #7 AND 8 NEED TO BE REVISED TO SHOW | | | THAT 15% LANDSCAPE AREA IS REQUIRED PER THE CURRENT | | | CODE. | | | | | | 6. WAIVER REQUEST #9 NEEDS TO REFERENCE SECTION | | | 94-443(A) BUFFERING OF NON-RESIDENTIAL USES ADJACENT TO | | | RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY FOR THE EAST BUFFERS AND 94-443(D) | | | ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS FOR MULTIFAMILY | | | RESIDENTIAL USES FOR THE BUFFERS ADJACENT TO PUBLIC | | | THOROUGHFARES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE 10 FEET IN WIDTH. | | | | | | 7. PROVIDE MEASUREMENTS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE | | | BUFFER TREES REQUIRED FOR ALL BUFFER LENGTHS PER | | | SECTION 94-443 B. AND INDICATE HOW THIS WILL BE | | | AFFECTED THROUGH THE WAIVER REQUESTS. INDICATE THE | | | WIDTH OF ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS PROVIDED ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE STREET TREES THAT ARE NOT AFFECTED | | | BY OVERHEAD UTILITIES NEED TO BE UPGRADED TO CATEGORY 1 | | | SHADE TREES IF USED AS A JUSTIFICATION FOR WAIVERS. | | | | | | | | | 8. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN | | | TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 9. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT | | | INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES | | | WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY | | | FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS. | | | | | | 10. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT | | | INCLUDING FPL TRANSFORMERS, A/C UNITS, ETC., AND | | | PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND | | | UTILITIES. | | | | | | 11. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN | | | TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 12. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT | | | INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES | | | WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY | | | FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS. | | | | | | 13. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT | | | INCLUDING FPL TRANSFORMERS, A/C UNITS, ETC., AND | | | PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND | | | UTILITIES. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
10-15-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
10-15-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
10-15-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-10-15 13:05:58 | NO FURTHER COMMENTS FROM DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
06-11-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
06-11-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-06-11 12:11:40 | PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS: | | | - LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID | | | WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE OF THE | | | COMPACTOR THAT WILL BE UTILIZED. | | | - DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEMS PICK UP | | | | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
10-05-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
10-05-2020 |
Time |
12:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
10-05-2020 |
Time |
12:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-10-05 12:20:35 | THE FOLLOWING COMENTS FROM THE STORMWATER STOP#5 WERE | | | ADDRESSED THROUGH EMAILS. COMMENT #3 WILL BECOME A | | | CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. WHERE DOES STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM TANDEM PARKING | | | SPACES DRAIN TO? THE EOR SUBMITTED A ROUGH SKETCH | | | SKETCH SHOWING HOW THE MEP MAY DESIGN A STORMWAER | | | COLLECTION SYSTEM TO ROUTE THE STORMWATER RUNOFF TO THE | | | STORMCEPTER STRUCTURE. THE ACTUAL DESIGN WILL NEED TO | | | BE SUBMITTED WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | | | | 3.THE BACK OF SIDEWALK FOR THE DRIVEWWAYS TO BARCELONA | | | ROAD AND TO CORDOVA ROAD SHALL BE THE HIGH POINT AND | | | THE PAVEMENT BEHIND THE SIDEWALK SLOPED TO DRAIN TO THE | | | INTERIOR OF THE SITE. NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION HAS BEEN | | | PROVIDED TO ADDRESS THIS COMMENT. THE PARKING GARAGE | | | PLANS APPEAR TO TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION AREAS FOR | | | STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BUT THESE AREAS MAY NEED BE BE | | | ENLARGED TOWARD THE SOUTH IF THE CURRENT FOOTPRINT | | | CANNOT ACCOMMODATE THE PLACEMENT OF THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM | | | TO BE LOWER THAN THE BACK OIF SIDEWALK. A CONDITION OF | | | THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL SHALL BE THE BACK OF SIDEWALK BE | | | AT LEAST 0.1 FEET HIGHER THAN THE INTERIIOR DRIVEWAY | | | GRADES. | | | | | | 4. WHERE DOES AREA EAST OF THE SOUTH BUILDING DRAIN TO? | | | THE EOR SUBMITTED A ROUGH SKETCH SKETCH SHOWING HOW THE | | | MEP MAY DESIGN A STORMWAER COLLECTION SYSTEM TO ROUTE | | | THE STORMWATER RUNOFF TO THE STORMCEPTER STRUCTURE. THE | | | ACTUAL DESIGN WILL NEED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH THE | | | ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 (O) | | | 561-351-0510 (M) | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-25-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
09-25-2020 |
Time |
16:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
09-25-2020 |
Time |
16:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-09-25 16:50:09 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | 9/11/2020 SUBMITTAL SET OF PLANS. | | | | | | 1. WHERE DOES STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM TANDEM PARKING | | | SPACES DRAIN TO? [NOT SATISFIED] THE RESPONSE TO THIS | | | COMMENT DISCUSSED THE ONSTREET PARALLEL PARKING SPACES. | | | THIS COMMENT IS REFERRING TO THE EAST SIDE OF THE | | | PROPOSED BUIDLING BETWEEN FLAMINGO DRIVE AND BARCELONA | | | ROAD, WHERE THERE ARE TRAVEL LANES IN BOTH DIRECTIONS | | | SEPARATED BY A BI-DIRECTIONAL TRAVEL LANE. IF DRAINAGE | | | SYSTEM WILL BE ON THE MEP PLANS, THEN FOR THE | | | CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN, SHOW INLET AND PIPING WITH | | | A NOTEE THAT FINAL DESIGN WILL BE ON THE MEP PLANS. | | | | | | 2. THE BACK OF WALK FOR THE EAST DRIVEWAY TO FLAMINGO | | | DRIVE SHALL BE THE HIGH POINT FOR THE DRIVEWAY SOUTH OF | | | THE SIDEWALK.[SATISFIED] | | | | | | 3.THE BACK OF SIDEWALK FOR THE DRIVEWWAYS TO BARCELONA | | | ROAD AND TO CORDOVA ROAD SHALL BE THE HIGH POINT AND | | | THE PAVEMENT BEHIND THE SIDEWALK SLOPED TO DRAIN TO THE | | | INTERIOR OF THE SITE.[PARTIALLY SATISFIED] THE LOADING | | | AREA SOUTH OF BARCELONA ROAD SHALL HAVE A LOW SPOT | | | SOUTH OF THE SIDEWALK. MOVE CASCADE SEPARATOR SOUTH AND | | | SHOW FLOW ARROW. | | | | | | 4. WHERE DOES AREA EAST OF THE SOUTH BUILDING DRAIN TO? | | | [REPEAT COMMENT] RESPONSE STATED DESIGN WILL BE SHOWN | | | ON MEP PLANS. SHOW FLOW ARROW FOR RAMP. SINCE THIS IS | | | CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN, SHOW GRATE AND POSSIBLE | | | PIPING TO THE CASCADE SEPARATOR. IF MEP WILL BE | | | PROVIDING THE FINAL DESIGN, THEN A NOTE CAN BE ADDED TO | | | THE PLAN INDICATING THIS. | | | | | | 5. CURB RAMPS ON THE NE CORNER OF FLAMINGO ROAD/S. | | | DIXIE HWY AND THE SE CORNER OF CORDOVA ROAD/S. DIXIE | | | HWY TO BE RECONSTRUCTED TO MEET CURRENT ADA | | | CRITERIA.[SATISFIED] | | | | | | 6. CONFIRM WITH FDOT THE MILL AND OVERLAY LIMITS ON S. | | | DIXIE HWY.[SATISFIED] | | | | | | 7. SHOW DRIVEWAY FOR 327 CORDOVA DRIVE AND THE STREET | | | LIGHT TO THE WEST OF THE DRIVEWAY. [SATISFIED] | | | | | | 8. SHOW LOCATION OF EXISTING LIGHTPOLES ON FLAMINGO | | | DRIVE. [SATISFIED] | | | | | | 9. STORMWATER DESIGN FOR FLAMINGO DRIVE AND BARCELONA | | | ROAD TO INCLUDE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF RIGHT OF WAY | | | BATWEEN S. DIXIE HWY AND S. OLIVE AVE., SHOW ALL | | | EXISTING UTILITIES IN THE RIGHT OF WAY AND | | | HORIZONTAL/VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN STORM PIPE AND | | | EXISTING UTILITIES. THIS CAN BE PROVIDED WITH | | | ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.[SATISFIED] RESPONSE AND | | | COMMENT INDICATED THIS COMMENT CAN BE ADDRESSED DURING | | | ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 (O) | | | 561-351-0510 (M) | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-25-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
08-25-2020 |
Time |
01:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
08-25-2020 |
Time |
02:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-08-25 02:51:05 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | 8/5/2020 SUBMITTAL SET OF PLANS. | | | | | | 1. WHERE DOES STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM TANDEM PARKING | | | SPACES DRAIN TO? | | | | | | 2. THE BACK OF WALK FOR THE EAST DRIVEWAY TO FLAMINGO | | | DRIVE SHALL BE THE HIGH POINT FOR THE DRIVEWAY SOUTH OF | | | THE SIDEWALK. | | | | | | 3.THE BACK OF SIDEWALK FOR THE DRIVEWWAYS TO BARCELONA | | | ROAD AND TO CORDOVA ROAD SHALL BE THE HIGH POINT AND | | | THE PAVEMENT BEHIND THE SIDEWALK SLOPED TO DRAIN TO THE | | | INTERIOR OF THE SITE. | | | | | | 4. WHERE DOES AREA EAST OF THE SOUTH BUILDING DRAIN TO? | | | | | | 5. CURB RAMPS ON THE NE CORNER OF FLAMINGO ROAD/S. | | | DIXIE HWY AND THE SE CORNER OF CORDOVA ROAD/S. DIXIE | | | HWY TO BE RECONSTRUCTED TO MEET CURRENT ADA CRITERIA. | | | | | | 6. CONFIRM WITH FDOT THE MILL AND OVERLAY LIMITS ON S. | | | DIXIE HWY. | | | | | | 7. SHOW DRIVEWAY FOR 327 CORDOVA DRIVE AND THE STREET | | | LIGHT TO THE WEST OF THE DRIVEWAY. | | | | | | 8. SHOW LOCATION OF EXISTING LIGHTPOLES ON FLAMINGO | | | DRIVE. | | | | | | 9. STORMWATER DESIGN FOR FLAMINGO DRIVE AND BARCELONA | | | ROAD TO INCLUDE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF RIGHT OF WAY | | | BATWEEN S. DIXIE HWY AND S. OLIVE AVE., SHOW ALL | | | EXISTING UTILITIES IN THE RIGHT OF WAY AND | | | HORIZONTAL/VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN STORM PIPE AND | | | EXISTING UTILITIES. THIS CAN BE PROVIDED WITH | | | ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 (O) | | | 561-351-0510 (M) | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-13-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
01-13-2020 |
Time |
09:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
01-13-2020 |
Time |
09:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-01-13 09:39:44 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | DECEMBER 31, 2019 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE: | | | | | | 1. MINIMUM STORMWATER PIPE SIZE IN THE RIGHT OF WAY IS | | | 15" RCP. THE FLAMINGO DRIVE STORMWATER EXTENSION WILL | | | NEED TO REPLACE THE EXISTING 12" PIPE ON THE WEST SIDE | | | OF OLIVE AVE. | | | | | | 2. THE STORMWATER SYSTEMN EXTENSION PROPOSED ON | | | BARCELONA ROAD WILL AFFECT THE EXISTING LANDSCAPED | | | BULBOUT ON THE STREET. | | | | | | 3. THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM EXTENSIONS IN THE RIGHT OF WAY | | | WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED ON A SEPARATE SET OF PLANS AND | | | APPROVED BY THE PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT OR | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. BASE SHEETS SHALL | | | INCLUDE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY INFORMATION. | | | | | | 4. ONSITE STOMWATER RUNOFF TO BE CAPTURED AND ROUTED | | | THROUGH THE ONSITE STORMWATER RMANAGEMENT SYSTEM. STAFF | | | COULD NOT DETERMINE HOW THE RUNOFF FROM THE DRIVEWAYS | | | WILL BE CAPTURED BEFORE LEAVING THE SITE. | | | | | | 5. ROOF DOWNSPOUTS TO BE DIRECTED TO THE ONSITE | | | STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. | | | | | | 6. SIDEWALKS ACROSS THE DRIVEWAYS TO BE CONSTRUCTED OF | | | CONCRETE. | | | | | | 7. REVISE THE ADA MAT FOR THE CURB RAMP ON THE EAST | | | SIDE OF THE MAIN DRIVEWAY TO FLAMINGO ROAD TO FOLLOW | | | THE CURB LINE. | | | | | | TRACY L. WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-09-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
10-09-2019 |
Time |
15:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
10-09-2019 |
Time |
15:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-10-09 15:43:19 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | OCTOBER 9, 2019 REVIEW SUBMITTAL PACKAGE: | | | | | | 1. IT APPEARS THE PROPOSED BUMPOUTS IN THE PARKING | | | SPACES ON S. DIXIE HIGHWAY WILL BLOCK THE DRAINAGE FLOW | | | IN THE GUTTER. | | | | | | 2. STAFF CANNOT DISCERN HOW THE STORMWATER RUNOFF IS | | | BEING CONVEYED TO THE PROPOSED CASCADE SEPARATORS FOR | | | WATER QUALITY TREATMENT.. | | | | | | 3. SHOW WHERE THE ROOF DOWNSPOUTS WILL BE LOCATED AND | | | HOW THAT FLOW WILL BE CONNECTED TO THE ONSITE | | | STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. | | | | | | 4. LABEL MINIMUM 6 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION | | | BETWEEN OUTSIDE WALLS OF WATER MAINS, STORMWATER MAINS | | | AND SEWER MAINS. | | | | | | 5. SHOW MILL AND RESURFACE LIMITS FOR THE TRENCH CUTS | | | ON S. DIXIE HWY. | | | | | | 6. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM THE ROAD CENTERLINE TO | | | FACE OF BUILDING OF EACH ON-STREET PARKING AREA TO SHOW | | | PAVEMENT AND SIDEWALK WIDTHS/SLOPES. SHWO THE LOCATION | | | OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE ON EACH CROSS SECTION. | | | | | | 7. REVISED SURVEY NOT INCLUDED IN THE REVIEW PACKAGE. | | | | | | 8. PROVIDE CORRESPONDENCE FROM FDOT THAT THEY HAVE NO | | | OBJECTIONS TO THE STOMRWATER SYSTEM CONNECTING TO THE | | | S. DIXIE HWY DRAINAGE SYSTEM. | | | | | | 9. CURB RAMPS WILL HAVE TO BE RECONSTRUCTED TO CURRENT | | | ADA REQUIREMENTS (INCLUDED THE TRUNCATED DOMES) IF THE | | | ASPHALT ADJACENT TO THE CURB RAMP IS | | | DISTURBED/MODIFIED. THIS WILL APPLY TO THE NE CORNER OF | | | FLAMINGO DRIVE AND SE CORNER OF CORDOVA ROAD. | | | | | | TRACY L. WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-10-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
06-10-2019 |
Time |
18:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
06-10-2019 |
Time |
18:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-06-10 18:50:23 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | | | APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/ | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | SITE PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. A NOTE ON THE CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN STATES | | | ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE RELATIVE TO THE NGVD 1929 VERTICAL | | | DATUM BASED ON A SURVEY PREPARED BY WALLACE SURVEYING, | | | CORP. THE BOUNDARY SURVEY (DATE OF LAST FIELD SURVEY | | | 2/28/2019) BY WALLACE SURVEYING NOTES THE ELEVATIONS ON | | | THE SURVEY (NONE FOUND) ARE BASED ON NAVD1988. THE | | | CITY?S VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD 1929. THE CITY HAS | | | ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD 1988 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION | | | EQUATION TO NGVD 1929 IS PROVIDED ON THE SHEET(S). LIST | | | THE CONVERSION EQUATION ON THE SURVEY AND CONFIRM THE | | | VERTICAL DATUM ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN. | | | | | | 2. LOWEST LEVEL OF THE PARKING GARAGES WILL BE 22 FEET | | | BELOW FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION. WHAT IS THE SEASONAL | | | HIGH WATER TABLE ELEVATION FOR THE SITE AND HOW WILL | | | GROUNDWATER TO BE CONTROLLED AROUND THE UNDERGROUND | | | PARKING STRUCTURES? | | | | | | 3. HOW WILL ANY STORMWATER RUNOFF ENTERING THE GARAGES | | | BE MANAGED? | | | | | | 4. IT APPEARS THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT (SWM) SYSTEM | | | CONSISTS OF BUBBLE-UP INLETS OUT INTO THE ROAD. THE SWM | | | SYSTEM SHOULD CONNECT INTO THE NEAREST DRAINAGE SYSTEM | | | (CORDOVA ROAD AND/OR S. DIXIE HIGHWAY) AND/OR INCLUDE | | | EXTENDING THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM ON FLAMINGO DRIVE TO THE | | | PROJECT. | | | | | | 5. THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IS TO BE DESIGNED | | | TO MEET SFWMD CRITERIA INCLUDING WATER QUALITY | | | TREATMENT AND PEAK FLOW ATTENUATION. | | | | | | 6. THE EXFILTRATION TRENCHES ARE PROPOSED ADJACENT TO | | | THE WALLS OF THE UNDERGROUND PARKING STRUCTURE. THE | | | STANDARD EXFILTRATION EQUATION DOES NOT APPLY IN THIS | | | SITUATION. | | | | | | 7. INDICATE MILLING AND RESURFACING LIMITS AROUND | | | TRENCH CUTS ON CITY STREETS. | | | | | | 8. SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE | | | ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED | | | WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP PRIOR TO STARTING | | | CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 4. S. DIXIE HIGHWAY IS MAINTAINED BY THE FLORIDA | | | DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. PERMITS WILL BE NEEDED | | | FROM FDOT. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-21-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
08-21-2020 |
Time |
10:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-08-21 10:51:12 | PASSED WITH CONDITIONS: | | | | | | 1. REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | 2. APPROVED ENGINEERING PLANS REQUIRED PRIOR TO | | | BUILDING PERMIT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-29-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
01-29-2020 |
Time |
09:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-01-29 09:08:28 | PREVIOUS COMMENTS NOT ADDRESSED. CCTV IS STILL REQUIRED | | | ALONG WITH THE OTHER ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS IN THE | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES APPLICATION. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-06-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
11-06-2019 |
Time |
07:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-11-06 07:19:33 | 1. SITE PLAN APPROVAL WILL NOT BE GRANTED UNTIL ALL | | | REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION, SECTION J | | | AND ENGINEERING CHECKLIST ON PAGE 17 ARE MET. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-07-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
06-07-2019 |
Time |
13:02 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-06-07 13:34:04 | 1. RE-PLAT WILL BE REQUIRED. ANY UNDERLYING EASEMENTS | | | WILL NEED TO BE ABANDONED/RELOCATED. | | | 2. MMOA WITH THE FDOT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR DIXIE HWY. | | | IMPROVEMENTS/LANDSCAPING. A DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT WILL | | | BE REQUIRED TO ASSUME THE MMOA AND FOR THE THREE SIDE | | | STREETS. | | | 3. DETAIL OF AREA WITH PROPOSED BACK-FLOWS SHOWING ALL | | | IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | 4. ENGINEERING PLANS DO NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. FURTHER REVIEW WILL BE | | | REQUIRED UPON RECEIPT OF REQUIRED INFORMATION. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-14-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
08-14-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
07-27-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-08-14 16:31:10 | PASSED, WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. | | | CONDITIONS | | | 1. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONDUCT PEDESTRIAN CROSSING | | | STUDIES FOR ENHANCED MARKED CROSSWALK ACROSS DIXIE | | | HIGHWAY AT BARCELONA ROAD AND CORDOVA ROAD ONE YEAR AND | | | TWO YEARS AFTER THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE MET, AND | | | CONSTRUCT THE ENHANCED AND MARKED PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS | | | WHEN WARRANTED AND APPROVED BY FDOT: | | | O CO IS ISSUED FOR AT LEAST 50% OF THE PROPOSED MOVIE | | | THEATRE OR RESIDENTIAL UNITS. | | | O THE LAST CO IS ISSUED FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. | | | 2. THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING STUDIES SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE LATEST REQUIREMENTS FROM FDOT. THE NECESSARY | | | TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN DATA SHALL BE COLLECTED BY THE | | | DEVELOPER FOR THE ANALYSES. | | | 3. PROVIDE SURETY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE ENHANCED | | | MARKED CROSSWALK UNTIL THE OBLIGATIONS RELATED TO | | | PEDESTRIAN CROSSING STUDIES OR PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK | | | CONSTRUCTION (#1 AND #2 ABOVE) ARE FULLY MET. | | | 4. COORDINATE WITH CITY ON PROVIDING SIDEWALK EASEMENT | | | FOR THE PORTION OF SIDEWALK WITHIN THE PROPERTY DURING | | | PERMITTING. | | | 5. THE DEVELOPER SHALL COORDINATE WITH FDOT AND CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH ON THE DIXIE HIGHWAY LANE ELIMINATION | | | PROJECT ALONG THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE UNTIL THE | | | CONSTRUCTION OF THE LANE ELIMINATION PROJECT IS | | | COMPLETED. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONSTRUCT BUS SHELTER | | | AND LANDSCAPE AT LOCATIONS NOT IN CONFLICT WITH THE | | | PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE SHARED USED PATH, OR BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR RELOCATION IF SUCH CONFLICTS OCCUR. | | | 6. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONTRIBUTE FUNDS TO THE FUTURE | | | TRANSIT OPERATIONS. THE ANNUAL CONTRIBUTION SHALL BE | | | CALCULATED AS THE NUMBER OF PROPOSED PARKING SPACES | | | MINUS THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED PARKING SPACES, AND THEN | | | MULTIPLIED BY THE ANNUAL PARKING FEE FOR | | | RESTAURANT/RETAIL (CURRENTLY AT $948 PER SPACE PER | | | YEAR). | | | 7. ALL ON-STREET PARKING SPACES ALONG THE SITE FRONTAGE | | | WILL BE METERED BY THE CITY. | | | 8. DIAGONAL HATCH SHOULD BE PROVIDED AT THE ONE-WAY | | | EGRESS DRIVEWAY ON BARCELONA ROAD TO NARROW THE | | | DRIVEWAY WIDTH TO 12 FEET. | | | | | | | | | VALERIO ORICCHIO | | | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
01-15-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-01-15 10:17:18 | PASSED, WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. | | | CONDITIONS | | | 1. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONDUCT PEDESTRIAN CROSSING | | | STUDIES FOR ENHANCED MARKED CROSSWALK ACROSS DIXIE | | | HIGHWAY AT BARCELONA ROAD AND CORDOVA ROAD ONE YEAR AND | | | TWO YEARS AFTER THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE MET, AND | | | CONSTRUCT THE ENHANCED AND MARKED PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS | | | WHEN WARRANTED AND APPROVED BY FDOT: | | | O CO IS ISSUED FOR AT LEAST 50% OF THE PROPOSED MOVIE | | | THEATRE OR RESIDENTIAL UNITS. | | | O THE LAST CO IS ISSUED FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. | | | 2. THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING STUDIES SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE LATEST REQUIREMENTS FROM FDOT. THE NECESSARY | | | TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN DATA SHALL BE COLLECTED BY THE | | | DEVELOPER FOR THE ANALYSES. | | | 3. PROVIDE SURETY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE ENHANCED | | | MARKED CROSSWALK UNTIL THE OBLIGATIONS RELATED TO | | | PEDESTRIAN CROSSING STUDIES OR PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK | | | CONSTRUCTION (#1 AND #2 ABOVE) ARE FULLY MET. | | | 4. COORDINATE WITH CITY ON PROVIDING SIDEWALK EASEMENT | | | FOR THE PORTION OF SIDEWALK WITHIN THE PROPERTY DURING | | | PERMITTING. | | | 5. THE DEVELOPER SHALL COORDINATE WITH FDOT AND CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH ON THE DIXIE HIGHWAY LANE ELIMINATION | | | PROJECT ALONG THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE UNTIL THE | | | CONSTRUCTION OF THE LANE ELIMINATION PROJECT IS | | | COMPLETED. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONSTRUCT BUS SHELTER | | | AND LANDSCAPE AT LOCATIONS NOT IN CONFLICT WITH THE | | | PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE SHARED USED PATH, OR BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR RELOCATION IF SUCH CONFLICTS OCCUR. | | | 6. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONTRIBUTE FUNDS TO THE FUTURE | | | TRANSIT OPERATIONS. THE ANNUAL CONTRIBUTION SHALL BE | | | CALCULATED AS THE NUMBER OF PROPOSED PARKING SPACES | | | MINUS THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED PARKING SPACES, AND THEN | | | MULTIPLIED BY THE ANNUAL PARKING FEE FOR | | | RESTAURANT/RETAIL (CURRENTLY AT $948 PER SPACE PER | | | YEAR). | | | 7. ALL ON-STREET PARKING SPACES ALONG THE SITE FRONTAGE | | | WILL BE METERED BY THE CITY. | | | 8. DIAGONAL HATCH SHOULD BE PROVIDED AT THE ONE-WAY | | | EGRESS DRIVEWAY ON BARCELONA ROAD TO NARROW THE | | | DRIVEWAY WIDTH TO 12 FEET. | | | | | | | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] | | | (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
10-23-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-10-23 10:46:10 | TRAFFIC STUDY COMMENTS: | | | 1. THE COUNTY TPS LETTER WAS DATED JULY 25, 2016. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A REVISED COUNTY TPS LETTER. | | | 2. BASED ON THE ASSUMPTION IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY, ABOUT | | | 59.6% OF TOTAL TRIPS OR 115 PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS (IN / | | | OUT) WOULD USE THE NORTH GARAGE. THE QUEUING ANALYSIS | | | ASSUMES 75% OF THESE 115 TRIPS WOULD USE VALET BUT ONLY | | | 58 TRIPS ARE USED IN THE ANALYSIS. PLEASE VERIFY AND | | | REVISE. | | | | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION (E.G. MEETING NOTES, | | | EMAIL COMMUNICATION, OR LETTER FROM FDOT) RELATED TO | | | THE DISCUSSION WITH FDOT ON RETAINING THE EXISTING | | | ON-STREET PARKING SPACES ON DIXIE HIGHWAY. | | | 4. THE TRAFFIC STUDY INDICATES THAT SOME VALETED | | | VEHICLES MAY BE PICKED UP ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY. PLEASE | | | VERIFY IF FDOT ALLOWS VALET OPERATIONS ON DIXIE HIGHWAY | | | AND IF A PERMIT IS REQUIRED. | | | 5. PLEASE VERIFY THE ON-STREET PARKING SPACES PROVIDED | | | ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAYS MEET REQUIREMENTS IN FDOT DESIGN | | | MANUAL SECTION 212.11.5. ALSO, THE FIRST ON-STREET | | | PARKING SPACES ON FLAMINGO DRIVE IS WITHIN 20 FEET OF | | | THE CROSSWALK, WHICH DOES NOT MEET MUTCD AND FLORIDA | | | STATUTES REQUIREMENTS. | | | 6. REPAVE THE STREET ALONG PROPERTY FRONTAGE ON | | | FLAMINGO DRIVE, BARCELONA ROAD AND CORDOVA ROAD DUE TO | | | UTILITY TIE-IN. | | | 7. DIMENSION THE SIDEWALK WIDTH ON FLAMINGO DRIVE, | | | BARCELONA ROAD AND CORDOVA ROAD. | | | 8. PLEASE INCLUDE AUTOTURN PATHS FOR ALL SERVICE AND | | | DELIVERY VEHICLES. | | | 9. CITY CODE SECTION 94-485 PROHIBITS BACKING UP ONTO | | | PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE LOADING ZONE ON BARCELONA ROAD | | | WOULD VIOLATE THE CITY CODE. | | | 10. COORDINATE WITH PALM TRAN ON THE BUS STOP LOCATION, | | | INSTALL AN ADA-COMPLIANT BUS SHELTER FOR THE EXISTING | | | BUS STOP, AND PROVIDE BUS STOP EASEMENT AS NEEDED. THE | | | BUS STOP EASEMENT SHOULD BE AT LEAST 14 FEET BY 8 FEET | | | AND BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PROPERTY TO PREVENT THE BUS | | | STOP FROM IMPACTING THE FUTURE SHARED USE PATH WHICH | | | WILL BE USED BY CYCLISTS AND PEDESTRIANS. | | | 11. PROVIDE A FUTURE TROLLEY STOP AND CONTRIBUTE FUNDS | | | TO THE FUTURE TROLLEY OPERATIONS ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY. | | | 12. PROVIDE SUBSIDIZED TRANSIT PASS TO EMPLOYEES AS AN | | | INCENTIVE FOR USING NON-AUTO MODES OF TRANSPORTATION. | | | 13. COORDINATE WITH FDOT ON THE LOCATION OF THE SHARED | | | USED PATH ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY. TREES SHOULD NOT BE | | | PROPOSED ALONG THE PLANNED LOCATION OF THE SHARED USE | | | PATH. THE DEVELOPER SHOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR | | | RELOCATING THE TREES OUTSIDE THE LOCATION OF THE SHARED | | | USE PATH ONCE THE LANE ELIMINATION PROJECT IS COMPLETED | | | BY FDOT. ALTERNATIVELY, THE DEVELOPER COULD CONTRIBUTE | | | FUNDING TO THE CITY FOR PROVIDING LANDSCAPE AS PART OF | | | THE LANE ELIMINATION PROJECT. | | | | | | CONDITIONS | | | 1. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONDUCT PEDESTRIAN CROSSING | | | STUDIES FOR ENHANCED MARKED CROSSWALK ACROSS DIXIE | | | HIGHWAY AT BARCELONA ROAD AND CORDOVA ROAD ONE YEAR AND | | | TWO YEARS AFTER THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE MET, AND | | | CONSTRUCT THE ENHANCED AND MARKED PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS | | | WHEN WARRANTED AND APPROVED BY FDOT: | | | O CO IS ISSUED FOR AT LEAST 50% OF THE PROPOSED MOVIE | | | THEATRE OR RESIDENTIAL UNITS. | | | O THE LAST CO IS ISSUED FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. | | | 2. THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING STUDIES SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE LATEST REQUIREMENTS FROM FDOT. THE NECESSARY | | | TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN DATA SHALL BE COLLECTED BY THE | | | DEVELOPER FOR THE ANALYSES. | | | 3. PROVIDE SURETY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE ENHANCED | | | MARKED CROSSWALK UNTIL THE OBLIGATIONS RELATED TO | | | PEDESTRIAN CROSSING STUDIES OR PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK | | | CONSTRUCTION (#1 AND #2 ABOVE) ARE FULLY MET. | | | 4. COORDINATE WITH CITY ON PROVIDING SIDEWALK EASEMENT | | | FOR THE PORTION OF SIDEWALK WITHIN THE PROPERTY DURING | | | PERMITTING. | | | | | | | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] | | | (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
06-11-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-06-11 18:02:52 | 1. THE COUNTY TPS LETTER WAS DATED JULY 25, 2016. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A VALID COUNTY TPS LETTER. | | | 2. IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY, INCLUDE DIXIE | | | HIGHWAY/BELVEDERE ROAD AS ONE OF THE STUDY | | | INTERSECTIONS. ALSO, ANALYZE BOTH SCENARIOS WITH AND | | | WITHOUT THE LANE ELIMINATION. | | | 3. APPROXIMATELY 45% OF OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES ARE | | | TANDEM PARKING. PLEASE PROVIDE VALET QUEUING ANALYSIS | | | TO VERIFY VEHICLE QUEUES WOULD NOT BACK UP TO FLAMINGO | | | DRIVE. | | | 4. PROVIDE NARRATIVES AND/OR EXHIBITS ON VALET | | | CIRCULATION ROUTES. | | | 5. FOR THE TANDEM PARKING SPACES ON THE GROUND FLOOR, | | | THE 24-FOOT PARKING AISLE WIDTH REQUIRED FOR PARKING | | | MANEUVER WOULD ENCROACH HALF OF THE SOUTHBOUND CURBSIDE | | | LANE. THE PARKING MANEUVER FOR THESE 20 PARKING SPACES | | | WOULD BE IN CONFLICT WITH POTENTIALLY UP TO 120 | | | VEHICLES PER HOUR DURING WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR. PLEASE | | | CONSIDER PROVIDING NON-TANDEM PARKING SPACES INSTEAD TO | | | PROVIDE ADDITIONAL MANEUVERING SPACE AND MINIMIZE | | | CONFLICTS WITH CIRCULATING VEHICLES. | | | 6. PROVIDE BACK-UP AREA FOR THE DEAD-END PARKING SPACE | | | IN THE EL FLAMINGO BUILDING (NORTHEAST CORNER), AND | | | BACK-UP AND TURNAROUND AREA FOR THE DEAD-END PARKING | | | SPACE IN THE EL CORDOVA BUILDING (SOUTHEAST CORNER). | | | 7. PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING SPACES PER CITY CODE AND | | | ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY. | | | 8. NO ON-STREET PARKING SPACE SHOULD BE PROVIDED WITHIN | | | 20 FEET OF CROSSWALK AT AN INTERSECTION PER MUTCD AND | | | FLORIDA STATUTES. | | | 9. CLARIFY IF PUBLIC PARKING SPACE IS AVAILABLE | | | ON-SITE. | | | 10. ON-STREET PARKING SPACES WILL BE METERED BY THE | | | CITY. | | | 11. PLEASE INCLUDE AUTOTURN PATHS FOR ALL SERVICE AND | | | DELIVERY VEHICLES. | | | 12. CITY CODE SECTION 94-485 PROHIBITS BACKING UP ONTO | | | PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE TWO LOADING ZONES WOULD | | | VIOLATE THE CITY CODE. | | | 13. DIMENSION THE SIDEWALK WIDTH. | | | 14. PROVIDE SIDEWALK EASEMENT FOR THE PORTION OF | | | SIDEWALK WITHIN THE PROPERTY. | | | 15. COORDINATE WITH PALM TRAN ON THE BUS STOP LOCATION, | | | INSTALL AN ADA-COMPLIANT BUS SHELTER FOR THE EXISTING | | | BUS STOP, AND PROVIDE BUS STOP EASEMENT AS NEEDED. | | | 16. THE SIGN AT THE FLAMINGO DRIVEWAY SHOULD READ | | | LEFT-TURN ONLY ON SHEET SP-1. | | | 17. THE CONCEPTUAL CIVIL PLAN SHOWS SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT | | | ACCESS CONFIGURATION THAN THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE REVISE. | | | 18. PROVIDE A FUTURE TROLLEY STOP AND CONTRIBUTE FUNDS | | | TO THE FUTURE TROLLEY OPERATIONS ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY. | | | 19. PLEASE PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT | | | (TDM) STRATEGIES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE | | | FOLLOWING, TO ENCOURAGE ALTERNATIVE MODES OF | | | TRANSPORTATION: | | | O UNBUNDLE PARKING SPACE FROM RESIDENTIAL LEASES | | | O OFFER TENANTS AND EMPLOYEES PARKING CASH OUT PROGRAM, | | | OR REMOVE FREE PARKING FROM EMPLOYEES AND UNBUNDLE | | | PARKING FROM COMMERCIAL LEASE | | | O PROVIDE FACILITIES FOR BICYCLE AND/OR MICRO-MOBILITY | | | ON-SITE | | | 20. THE APPLICANT SHOULD EVALUATE AND CONSTRUCT, IF | | | WARRANTED, AN ENHANCED MARKED CROSSWALK ACROSS DIXIE | | | HIGHWAY AT BARCELONA ROAD AND CORDOVA ROAD UPON OPENING | | | OF THE DEVELOPMENT. | | | 21. REMOVE ON-STREET PARKING ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY. | | | ON-STREET PARKING ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY WILL BE PROVIDED | | | AS PART OF THE LANE ELIMINATION PROJECT WHEN | | | APPROPRIATE. | | | 22. COORDINATE WITH FDOT ON THE LOCATION OF THE SHARED | | | USED PATH ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY. TREES SHOULD NOT BE | | | PROPOSED ALONG THE PLANNED LOCATION OF THE SHARED USE | | | PATH. | | | | | | | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] | | | (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS) | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
10-01-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
10-01-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
10-01-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-10-01 08:21:18 | TECHNICAL REVIEW OF PLANS SUFFICIENT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-20-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
08-20-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
08-20-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-08-20 12:17:32 | 1.) THE PROVIDED REAR SETBACK FOR THE FLAMINGO BUILDING | | | IS 17 FT. (NOT 17.7 FT. AS NOTED IN THE WAIVER CHART). | | | THEREFORE, THE WAIVER REQUESTED IS 66.6 FT. PLEASE | | | ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. | | | | | | 2.) THE CALCULATED REQUIRED REAR SETBACK FOR THE | | | CORDOVA BUILDING IS 69.4 FT. (NOT 69.2 FT.). THEREFORE, | | | THE WAIVER REQUESTED IS 44.4 FT. (NOT 44.2 FT.). PLEASE | | | ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. | | | | | | 3.) PLEASE PROVIDE CLARIFICATION FOR THE FOLLOWING AS | | | IT WILL IMPACT THE REQUESTED WAIVERS FOR IMPERMEABLE | | | SURFACE AND PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA: PER THE ZLDRS | | | MAXIMUM IMPERMEABLE SURFACE REQUIREMENT IS 60% AND | | | MINIMUM LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIREMENT IS 15% (TOTAL OF | | | 100%). THE PROJECT IS PROPOSING 97% IMPERMEABLE SURFACE | | | AND 10% LANDSCAPE AREA (TOTAL 107%). PLEASE EXPLAIN THE | | | CALCULATIONS, AS THE IMPERMEABLE AND PERVIOUS AREA | | | REQUIREMENTS SHOULD ADD UP TO 100%). THIS MAY ALSO | | | IMPACT THE SITE DATA CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 4.) NEED CLARIFICATION ON WAIVER #11 IN THE WAIVER | | | CHART, AS THIS WAIVER SEEMS TO REFERENCE SIGNAGE | | | REQUIREMENTS IN AN RPD (THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS A CPD). | | | | | | 5.) CLARIFICATION/ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NEEDED ON | | | THE PROPOSED SIGN PROGRAM ON SHEET SP-2. IT IS NOT | | | CLEAR IF THE SIGNAGE IS SUPPOSED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH | | | THE SIGN REQUIREMENTS OF THE GC ZONING DISTRICT AND/OR | | | IF THE SIGN PROGRAM REQUIRES WAIVER(S). THERE SEEMS TO | | | BE A LOT OF WALL SIGNAGE PROPOSED. THERE NEEDS TO BE | | | CLARIFICATION IF THE INTENT IS ONE WALL SIGN PER TENANT | | | OR IF THERE ARE EXCEPTIONS FOR MULTIPLE SIGNS PER | | | TENANT. | | | | | | 6.) CORRECTION NEEDS TO BE MADE TO CLEARLY DISTINGUISH | | | FAR/NON-FAR SPACE ADJACENT TO THE ELEVATOR, LOBBY AND | | | RETAIL SPACE OF THE CORDOVA BUILDING ON SHEET A-1.01. | | | ADJUST FAR/NON-FAR CALCULATIONS IF NECESSARY. | | | | | | 7.) CORRECTION NEEDS TO BE MADE TO CLEARLY DISTINGUISH | | | FAR/NON-FAR SPACE IN THE CORDOVA BUILDING ON SHEET | | | A-1.04. PER THE ZLDR S.94-145(11), THE FLOOR AREA SHALL | | | BE MEASURED FROM THE OUTSIDE FACE OF THE EXTERIOR WALL, | | | WHICH MEANS THE WALLS SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE FAR | | | CALCULATIONS. ADJUST FAR/NON-FAR CALCULATIONS IF | | | NECESSARY. | | | | | | 8.) ON SHEET A-3.01: WHAT ARE THE SETBACKS FOR THE | | | UPPER TIERED LEVELS OF THE FLAMINGO AND CORDOVA | | | BUILDINGS FACING THE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL? THE | | | SETBACK DIMENSION WILL HELP STAFF WITH THE PROJECT | | | ANALYSIS. | | | | | | 9.) PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL LIGHT POLE FIXTURES ARE | | | SETBACK AT LEAST 5 FT. FROM THE PROPERTY LINES. INCLUDE | | | DIMENSIONS TO DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENCY WITH THE ZLDRS. | | | [NOTE: STAFF CANNOT DETERMINE IF THE POLE FIXTURES SITE | | | INSIDE OR OUTSIDE OF THE REQUIRED 5 FT. SETBACK. THIS | | | WAS A MISSED COMMENT BY STAFF ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEW.] | | | | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | * CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | * INCLUDE THE REVISION DATE TO ANY REVISED SHEETS TO | | | KEEP TRACK OF ALL CHANGES MADE TO THE PROJECT. | | | | | | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX | | | (6) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 INCHES X | | | 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 INCHES, AND | | | AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT | | | CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. | | | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE ANY | | | QUESTIONS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-21-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
01-21-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
01-21-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-01-21 08:47:13 | 1.) THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF THE FLAMINGO BUILDING IS 75 | | | FT. (NOT 71.8 FT.) AS NOTED IN THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. | | | THE HEIGHT AND SETBACK CALCULATIONS AND TABLE | | | INFORMATION SHOULD BE REVISED TO ADDRESS THE MAXIMUM | | | HEIGHT. [NOTE: THIS COMMENT WAS MISSED BY STAFF IN THE | | | LAST RESUBMITTAL] | | | | | | 2.) THERE IS A PROPOSED 8 FT. HIGH CONCRETE WALL ALONG | | | THE EAST PROPERTY LINE ABUTTING 314 FLAMINGO DRIVE. THE | | | EXISTING STRUCTURE AT 314 FLAMINGO DRIVE SEEMS TO HAVE | | | A 0 FT. SETBACK FROM THE PROPERTY LINE (NEEDS TO BE | | | VERIFIED). IF THIS IS THE CASE, THE LOCATION OF THE | | | PROPOSED WALL WILL NEED TO BE RELOCATED SO AS NOT TO | | | CONFLICT WITH THE EXISTING STRUCTURE. [NOTE: THIS | | | COMMENT WAS MISSED BY STAFF IN THE LAST RESUBMITTAL] | | | | | | 3.) THE PROPOSED NUMBER OF STORIES SEEM TO BE 5 (NOT 4) | | | SINCE USABLE SPACE (I.E. GYM) IS LOCATED ON THE 5TH | | | FLOOR. INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE PLANS SHOULD BE | | | ADDRESSED ACCORDINGLY. [NOTE: THIS COMMENT WAS MISSED | | | BY STAFF IN THE LAST RESUBMITTAL] | | | | | | 4.) CHECK THE PROPOSED PARKING COUNT. THE COUNT STILL | | | SEEMS TO BE INCORRECT AND IT HAS AFFECTED THE | | | CALCULATIONS FOR PARKING. ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. | | | | | | 5.) THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT PROVIDED IN THE | | | ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS SEEM TO BE INCONSISTENT. CLARIFY | | | FOR CONSISTENCY. | | | | | | 6.) SOME SPACES WITHIN THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS HAVE | | | BEEN EXCLUDED FROM THE FAR CALCULATIONS WHICH STAFF | | | BELIEVES SHOULD HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN THE FAR | | | CALCULATIONS. THE ARCHITECT MUST CLARIFY THESE SPACES | | | AND ADJUST THE FAR CALCULATIONS IN ALL APPLICABLE PLANS | | | ACCORDINGLY. | | | | | | 7.) DEMONSTRATE THAT THE BICYCLE STORAGE AREAS CAN | | | ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING | | | SPACES. | | | | | | 8.) THE ARCHITECT WILL NEED TO MEET WITH STAFF TO | | | CLARIFY OTHER MINOR INCONSISTENCIES WITH THE FAR | | | CALCULATIONS AS DEPICTED IN THE ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR | | | PLANS. | | | | | | 9.) IT IS ADVISED THAT THE APPLICANT MEET WITH STAFF TO | | | DISCUSS THE INCONSISTENCIES AND CONCERNS WITH THE | | | PROJECT. PLEASE CONTACT STAFF TO SET UP A MEETING. | | | | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL | | | | | | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | * CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | * INCLUDE THE REVISION DATE TO ANY REVISED SHEETS TO | | | KEEP TRACK OF ALL CHANGES MADE TO THE PROJECT. | | | | | | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF | | | FIFTEEN (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 | | | INCHES X 11 INCHES, AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 | | | INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600.00). | | | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE | | | QUESTIONS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-01-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
11-01-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
11-01-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-11-01 13:28:38 | GENERAL COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) PROVIDE AUTO TURN DIAGRAM FOR LOADING AND UNLOADING | | | TRUCKS FOR BOTH BUILDINGS. NOTE: THE JUSTIFICATION | | | STATEMENT STATES AN AUTO TURN DIAGRAM HAS BEEN | | | PROVIDED; HOWEVER, IT SEEMS TO BE MISSING FROM THE | | | SUBMITTALS. | | | | | | 2.) AMEND THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT TO ADDRESS THE | | | FOLLOWING: WILL THERE BE VALET PARKING ATTENDANT AT ALL | | | TIMES? IF SO, THIS MUST BE NOTED IN THE STATEMENT, AS | | | VALET PARKING MUST HAVE AN ATTENDANT; PER ZLDR | | | S.94-207(B)(1), THE PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SHALL | | | COMPLY WITH S.94-33, ARTICLE XII AND ARTICLE XVII. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE THE RESPONSES FOR CONSISTENCY. | | | | | | 3.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE CITY'S PUBLIC | | | UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR | | | WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE | | | COLLECTION SERVICES. ALSO, PROVIDE LETTERS FROM THE | | | FOLLOWING PUBLIC UTILITIES CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED | | | PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR | | | OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISION OF THEIR | | | SERVICES: AT&T, FPU AND FPL. NOTE: LETTERS MUST | | | REFERENCE ALL APPLICABLE PARCELS OF THE PROJECT. | | | [9/24/19 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 4.) A PREDETERMINATION LETTER FROM THE FLORIDA | | | DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) IS REQUIRED FOR THE | | | PROPOSED CHANGES ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY [6/11/19 AND | | | 9/24/19 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | | | | SITE PLAN COMMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) AS DISCUSSED AT THE MEETING HELD ON 11/1/2019 WITH | | | STAFF AND THE AGENT, THE FAR CALCULATIONS MUST BE | | | REVISED, TO ACCURATELY REFLECT FAR AND NON-FAR SPACES. | | | | | | 2.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE SITE DATA | | | TABULAR AND/OR WAIVER CHART: THERE IS AN ASTERISK BY | | | THE WORD "OTHER." PLEASE DEFINE; CORRECT THE | | | RESIDENTIAL DENSITY TO 32.15 DU/AC (NOT 32 DU/AC, AS | | | THIS IMPLIES THAT THE DENSITY IS 32 DU/AC WHICH IS NOT | | | ACCURATE; CHECK PARKING CALCULATIONS, AS THEY SEEM TO | | | BE INCORRECT; ALSO NOTE THAT THE CALCULATIONS FOR GUEST | | | PARKING IS BASED ON THE OVERALL UNIT COUNT FOR THE | | | PROJECT; SETBACK CALCULATIONS ARE INCORRECT - PLEASE | | | ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. | | | | | | 3.) ARE THE IMPROVEMENTS ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY | | | CONSISTENT WITH THE SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY CORRIDOR | | | IMPROVEMENT PLAN? PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION OF THE | | | CORRESPONDANCE WITH FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF | | | TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) STATING THAT THERE ARE NO ISSUES | | | WITH THE PROPOSED CHANGES ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY. | | | | | | 4.) IT IS VERY DIFFICULT TO SEE THE EXTENT OF THE | | | PROPOSED 8 FT. HIGH WALL ALONG THE REAR PROPERTY LINES | | | OF BOTH PARCELS (EL FLAMINGO AND EL CORDOVA). PLEASE | | | ADDRESS. [9/24/19 REVISED COMMENT] | | | | | | 5.) SETBACK DISTANCE OF ALL PROJECTIONS (I.E. | | | BALCONIES) MUST BE DIMENSIONED IN THE SITE PLAN. NOT | | | ALL PROJECTIONS (I.E. BALCONY) AND/OR SETBACK | | | DIMENSIONS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED. | | | | | | 6.) BICYCLE RACK DOES NOT MATCH BICYCLE RACK DETAIL ON | | | SHEET SP-2. | | | | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL (FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS): | | | | | | 1.) ON SHEET A-0CV, THE FAR AND UNIT CALCULATIONS ARE | | | INCORRECT. ALSO, THE FAR SPACE CALCULATIONS WILL NEED | | | TO BE ADJUSTED FOR CONSISTENCY. | | | | | | 2.) ARE THE ADJACENT BUILDINGS SCALED IN THE SITE | | | SECTIONS (SHEET A-800)? IF NOT, PLEASE SCALE, AS THIS | | | WAS REQUESTED IN PAST COMMENTS AND DISCUSSIONS BETWEEN | | | STAFF AND THE APPLICANT. | | | | | | 5.) THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING | | | SPACES WITHIN THE UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE REQUIRES | | | APPROVAL FROM THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE | | | WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION THAT THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT HAS | | | REVIEWED AND AND HAS APPROVED THE LOCATIONS OF THE | | | ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. [6/11/19 AND 924/19 REPEAT | | | COMMENT]. | | | | | | | | | SIGNAGE COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) AT MINIMUM, A NOTE SHALL BE ADDED TO ALL PLAN | | | SHEETS WITH SIGNAGE INDICATING THAT ALL PROPOSED | | | SIGNAGE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE SIGNAGE REGULATIONS OF | | | THE UNDERLYING ZONING DISTRICT. [9/24/19 REVISED | | | COMMENT] | | | | | | | | | PHOTOMETRIC/LIGHTING PLAN COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) ANY SOURCE OF ILLUMINATION LOCATED WITHIN A | | | COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD) DISTRICT SHALL NOT | | | EXCEED ONE-FOOT CANDLE AT OR BEYOND THE BOUNDARIES OF | | | THE SUCH DEVELOPMENT. THE PROJECT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH | | | THIS REQUIREMENT. [9/24/19 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 2.) ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE | | | GLARE AND SHALL BE ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE | | | AWAY FROM ALL ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT | | | RESIDENCES, OR PUBLIC THOROUGHFARE. [9/24/19 REPEAT | | | COMMENT - ALTHOUGH A NOTE HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE | | | PHOTOMETRIC PLAN, THE NOTE IS INCOMPLETE AND DOES NOT | | | ADDRESS THE FULL EXTENT OF THE ZLDR REQUIREMENT.] | | | | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | * CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | * INCLUDE THE REVISION DATE TO ANY REVISED SHEETS TO | | | KEEP TRACK OF ALL CHANGES MADE TO THE PROJECT. | | | | | | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF | | | FIFTEEN (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 | | | INCHES X 11 INCHES, AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 | | | INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600.00). | | | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE | | | QUESTIONS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-24-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
09-24-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
09-24-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-09-24 14:27:50 | GENERAL COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) A SIGNED OWNER'S CONSENT FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER IS | | | REQUIRED. THE SUBMITTED OWNER'S CONSENT DOES NOT | | | ADDRESS BOTH CORPORATIONS. PLEASE ADDRESS. [6/11/2019 | | | REVISED COMMENT] | | | | | | 2.) PLEASE REVISE THE JUSTIFICATION LETTER (DATED | | | 5/14/2019) TO ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING INCONSISTENCIES: | | | THIS HISTORY SECTION ON PAGES 2 AND 3 DOES NOT SEEM TO | | | REFLECT THE CORRECT OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHT (OVERALL | | | BUILDING HEIGHT IS NOT 69 FT. AS NOTED); UNIT MIX | | | THROUGHOUT THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT IS MULTIFAMILY | | | APARTMENTS AND TOWNHOUSES - JUSTIFICATION KEEPS | | | REFERRING TO APARTMENTS. THIS MUST BE CLARIFIED. ALSO, | | | PLEASE CLARIFY IF ALL 58 UNITS (INCLUDING THE | | | TOWNHOUSES) WILL BE RENTALS; IN THE CPD AND SITE PLAN | | | SECTION ON PAGES 7 AND 8: PLEASE ENSURE TOWNHOUSES ARE | | | ALSO PROPOSED IN THE DEVELOPMENT (VERBIAGE SEEMS TO | | | IMPLY ONLY APARTMENT UNITS); CHECK THE BREAKDOWN OF THE | | | PROPOSED INTENSITY ON PAGE 8 (I.E. TABULATION FOR | | | PARKING DOES NOT MATCH THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE | | | SITE PLAN); IN THE PARKING AND CIRCULATION SECTION ON | | | PAGES 8 AND 9: PARKING NUMBERS DO NOT MATCH THE NUMBERS | | | PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE CHECK CALCULATIONS. | | | MORE INFORMATION IS REQUIRED FOR PARKING CIRCULATION | | | AND HOW THAT FUNCTIONS WITH THE VALET PARKING. IT | | | STATES IN THE LETTER THAT PARKING WILL BE OPEN TO THE | | | NON-COMMERCIAL PUBLIC. WHAT ARE THE ASSURANCES THAT THE | | | PROJECT WILL ALWAYS MAINTAIN SUFFICIENT PARKING FOR THE | | | USES WITHIN AND HAVING THE ABILITY TO PROVIDE | | | ADDITIONAL PARKING FOR OTHERS; PER ZLDR S.94-207(B)(1), | | | THE PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | S.94-35(C), S.94-33, ARTICLE XII AND ARTICLE XVII. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE THE RESPONSES FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE | | | ZLDRS; IN THE COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD) | | | STANDARDS ON PAGES 11 AND 12, #8 MAKES REFERENCES TO AN | | | INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. PLEASE | | | CORRECT; THE WAIVERS SECTION ON PAGES 12-17 DOES NOT | | | PROVIDE MUCH INFORMATION ON THE MITIGATION MEASURES FOR | | | EACH WAIVER REQUEST. STAFF NEEDS TO KNOW WHAT MEASURES | | | ARE BEING MADE TO REDUCE THE IMPACT(S) OF EACH WAIVER | | | REQUEST. [NOTE: ALTHOUGH SOME OTHER COMMENTS MAY HAVE | | | BEEN ADDRESS, STAFF WOULD NEED TO VERIFY THE | | | INFORMATION IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PLANS. NO PLANS WERE | | | SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE 8/2/2019 RESUBMITTAL.] | | | | | | 3.) A TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW LETTER | | | FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION IS | | | REQUIRED. THE LETTER SHALL STATE THAT THE PROPOSED | | | PROJECT MEETS THE TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OF THE | | | COUNTY, PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE PROJECT FOR A PUBLIC | | | HEARING. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 4.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE CITY'S PUBLIC | | | UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR | | | WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE | | | COLLECTION SERVICES. [NOTE: A LETTER FROM THE CITY'S | | | PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS BEEN PROVIDED; HOWEVER, | | | IT DOES NOT REFERENCE ALL PARCELS IN THE SCOPE OF THE | | | PROJECT. PLEASE ADDRESS.] | | | | | | 5.) PROVIDE LETTERS FROM THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC UTILITIES | | | CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH | | | INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE | | | PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, FPU AND FPL. [NOTE: | | | THE LETTERS FROM AT&T, FPU AND FPL DOES NOT REFERENCE | | | ALL PARCELS IN THE SCOPE OF THE PROJECT. PLEASE | | | ADDRESS.] | | | | | | 6.) A MASSING STUDY AS WELL AS CROSS SECTIONS OF THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT IN RELATIONSHIP TO THE | | | IMMEDIATE/SURROUNDING AREAS/BUILDINGS IS REQUIRED. | | | [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 7.) A PREDETERMINATION LETTER FROM THE FLORIDA | | | DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) IS REQUIRED FOR THE | | | PROPOSED CHANGES ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY. [6/11/2019 | | | REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 8.) PLANS HAVE A LARGE AMOUNT OF DATA AND NEEDS TO BE | | | MADE CLEAR BY AVOIDING ANY TEXT OVERLAP, ETC. | | | [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT - NO PLANS PROVIDED WITH THIS | | | RESUBMITTAL] | | | | | | 9.) PLEASE BE SURE TO INCLUDE THE REVISION DATE TO THE | | | REVISED SHEETS TO KEEP TRACK OF ALL CHANGES TO THE | | | PROJECT. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT - NO PLANS PROVIDED | | | WITH THIS RESUBMITTAL] | | | | | | | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) PER ZLDR SECTION 94-145(11), THE FAR INCLUDES | | | AIR-CONDITIONED OR FULLY ENCLOSED STORAGE SPACES, | | | ENCLOSED AREAS ON THE ROOFTOP SUCH AS BATHROOMS AND | | | LOBBIES, STAIRS AND ELEVATOR AREAS, AND EXTERNAL | | | UNENCLOSED CIRCULATION AREAS. THE FLOOR AREA RATIO | | | (FAR) CALCULATION FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT APPEARS TO | | | BE INCORRECT, AS CERTAIN SPACES (I.E. STAIRS, | | | ELEVATORS, ETC.) HAVE BEEN EXCLUDED FROM THE FAR (AS | | | PROVIDED IN THE SITE DATA NOTES). THE FAR CANNOT EXCEED | | | 1.5. PLEASE ADDRESS. [ZLDR S.94-243, TABLE VIII-3] | | | [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 2.) WHAT IS THE SETBACK DISTANCE FROM THE EXTENT OF THE | | | UNDERGROUND GARAGE TO THE PROPERTY LINE? THE | | | UNDERGROUND GARAGE SEEMS TO EXTEND CLOSER TO THE | | | PROPERTY LINE THAN THE ABOVE GROUND STRUCTURES FOR BOTH | | | BUILDINGS AND NO DIMENSIONS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED FOR THIS | | | SETBACK. THE UNDERGROUND STRUCTURE IS A PART OF THE | | | BUILDING AND THEREFORE, THE SETBACKS SHALL BE MEASURED | | | FROM THE EXTENT OF THE UNDERGROUND GARAGE (CLOSEST | | | POINT) TO THE PROPERTY LINES. [6/11/2019 REPEAT | | | COMMENT] | | | | | | 3.) PARKING/LOADING CONFIGURATION WHICH REQUIRE BACKING | | | DIRECTLY ONTO A STREET FROM A PARKING OR LOADING SPACE | | | FOR MORE THAN TWO (2) RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND ALL | | | NON-RESIDENTIAL USES SHALL BE PROHIBITED IN ALL | | | RESIDENTIAL AND NON-RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS. THE | | | LOADING AREA WITHIN THE EL FLAMINGO BUILDING SEEM TO | | | REQUIRE VEHICLES TO BACK OUT INTO THESE PROHIBITED | | | ZONES. PLEASE ADDRESS. [ZLDR S.94-485(J)(1)] [6/11/2019 | | | REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 4.) ARE THE IMPROVEMENTS ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY | | | CONSISTENT WITH THE SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY CORRIDOR | | | IMPROVEMENT PLAN? PLEASE MEET WITH THE CITY'S | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT TO COORDINATE AND | | | ADDRESS. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 5.) STAFF IS REQUESTING THE APPLICANT ACCOMMODATE AN 8 | | | FT. HIGH CONCRETE WALL ALONG THE REAR PROPERTY LINES OF | | | BOTH PARCELS (EL FLAMINGO AND EL CORDOVA) TO HELP | | | MITIGATE THE IMPACT OF THE PROJECT NEXT TO THE EXISTING | | | RESIDENTIAL USES. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 6.) THE PROPOSED VALET BULLPEN SEEMS TO BE IN CONFLICT | | | WITH THE DESIGNATED LANES FOR INTERNAL CIRCULATION. | | | PLEASE ADDRESS. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 7.) THE CIVIL PLAN SHOWS THE LOCATION OF WATER METERS | | | NEAR THE ACCESS/EXIT POINTS OF THE BUILDINGS. PLEASE | | | SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE WATER METERS IN THE PLAN AND | | | PROVIDE A DETAIL. THE DETAIL IS REQUIRED TO ENSURE THAT | | | THE METER(S) WILL NOT IMPACT VISIBILITY AND APPROPRIATE | | | SCREENING MEASURES ARE IMPLEMENTED. [6/11/2019 REPEAT | | | COMMENT] | | | | | | 8.) HOW FAR DO THE BALCONIES EXTEND INTO THE | | | SETBACK(S)? BALCONIES CANNOT ENCROACH MORE THAN 3 FT. | | | INTO ANY SETBACK. PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS TO | | | DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENCY. [ZLDR S.94-305(B)(2)] | | | [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 9.) ALL ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (I.E. HVAC | | | EQUIPMENT) SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW. PLEASE PROVIDE | | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION/ILLUSTRATION TO HOW THE PROJECT | | | WILL COMPLY WITH THIS REQUIREMENT. [6/11/2019 REPEAT | | | COMMENT] | | | | | | 10.) THE EXISTING USE WEST OF THE EL FLAMINGO BUILDING | | | IS A PRIVATE SCHOOL (NOT AUTO SALES, AS SPECIFIED IN | | | THE PLAN). PLEASE ADDRESS FOR ACCURACY. [6/11/2019 | | | REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 11.) THE EXISTING USES WEST OF THE EL CORDOVA BUILDING | | | SEEMS TO BE AN ART GALLERY AND RESTAURANT, AND PARKING | | | LOT ASSOCIATED WITH THE GREENE SCHOOL. PLEASE ADDRESS | | | FOR ACCURACY. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 12.) PLEASE LABEL ALL BUILDING SETBACKS IN THE PLAN. | | | [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 13.) A STALL STRIPING DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE | | | PLAN. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 14.) BICYCLE PARKING IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO ZLDR | | | S.94-485(9). PLEASE ADDRESS. A BICYCLE PARKING DETAIL | | | IS ALSO REQUIRED IN THE PLAN. [6/11/2019 REPEAT | | | COMMENT] | | | | | | 15.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE SITE DATA | | | TABULAR: APPLICATION NUMBER: PB 1712C/Z19050024; | | | RECALCULATION OF FAR REQUIRED; PROPOSED NUMBER OF | | | DWELLING UNITS FOR THE PROJECT IS 58 (NOT 56); | | | RECALCULATION OF REQUIRED AND PROPOSED PARKING | | | REQUIRED. THE PARKING CALCULATIONS SEEM TO BE | | | INCORRECT. ADDITIONALLY, THE PARKING COUNT DOES NOT | | | MATCH THE PARKING CALCULATIONS PROVIDED IN THE | | | ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS; PROPOSED PARKING SHOULD INCLUDE | | | THE VALET PARKING CALCULATIONS (SINCE IT WILL NOT COUNT | | | TOWARDS REQUIRED PARKING); PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING FOR | | | THE PROJECT; PROVIDE THE LANDSCAPE/PERVIOUS SURFACE | | | AREA CALCULATION (REQUIRED AND PROPOSED) IN SQUARE | | | FEET; RECALCULATE LOADING SPACE REQUIREMENT. SEEMS TO | | | BE INCORRECT; CHECK THE NUMBER OF BUILDING STORIES | | | PROVIDED IN THE TABULAR (TABLE INDICATE 7 STORIES. | | | HOWEVER, PLANS SEEM TO SHOW 4 STORIES ABOVE GROUND). | | | [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 16.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS TABULAR: PER ZLDR ARTICLE VIII, THE MINIMUM | | | IMPERVIOUS SURFACE REQUIREMENT IS 85% (NOT 80%). THIS | | | MAY IMPACT THE WAIVER REQUEST FOR THE IMPERVIOUS | | | SURFACE REQUIREMENT; THE LANGUAGE IN THE NOTE AT THE | | | BOTTOM OF THE TABLE IS NOT CONSISTENT. [6/11/2019 | | | REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 17.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE | | | SETBACKS/SEPARATIONS TABULAR: REQUIRED SETBACK | | | CALCULATIONS ARE INCORRECT. THIS NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED | | | AS IT WILL IMPACT THE WAIVER REQUESTS TO THE REQUIRED | | | SETBACKS; IT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A LEGEND TO | | | IDENTIFY WHAT "N" AND "S" MEANS. [6/11/2019 REPEAT | | | COMMENT] | | | | | | 18.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE WAIVER CHART: | | | REQUIRED SETBACKS ARE INCORRECT AND WILL NEED TO BE | | | CORRECTED AS IT WILL IMPACT THE WAIVERS REQUESTED; THE | | | REQUIRED MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA IS 85% (NOT | | | 80%). CALCULATIONS WILL NEED TO BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY. | | | [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 19.) THE SITE DATA TABULAR INDICATES A TOTAL OF THREE | | | (3) LOADING ZONES PROVIDED; HOWEVER, ONLY TWO (2) HAVE | | | BEEN COUNTED IN THE PLAN. PLEASE ADDRESS. [6/11/2019 | | | REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 20.) SHOW THE WIDTH OF THE ROADWAY FOR ALL PUBLIC | | | STREETS IN THE PLAN (I.E. FLAMINGO, BARCELONA, CORDOVA, | | | ETC.) [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL (FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS): | | | | | | 1.) PROVIDE PLANS ILLUSTRATING WHAT SPACES IN THE | | | PROPOSED BUILDINGS ARE COUNTED IN THE FAR CALCULATIONS | | | (I.E. USE SHADING/HATCHING, ETC.); ALSO PROVIDE THE | | | DETAILED CALCULATIONS FOR EACH FLOOR. [6/11/2019 REPEAT | | | COMMENT] | | | | | | 2.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE PARKING GARAGE | | | PLANS (SHEETS A-1.07 AND A-1.08): PARKING CALCULATIONS | | | SEEM TO BE INCORRECT; DIMENSION OUT THE STALLS, AISLES, | | | WALKWAYS AND DRIVE AISLES; THERE SEEMS TO BE MORE | | | COMPACT PARKING SPACES COUNTED THEN NOTED IN THE PLANS; | | | DIMENSION OUT THE 2 FT. CURB OVERHANG; ARE WHEEL STOPS | | | PROVIDED FOR THE STALLS? IF SO, PLEASE ILLUSTRATE; PER | | | ZLDR S.94-485(O), ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE | | | LOCATED SO THAT USERS ARE NOT COMPELLED TO WALK OR | | | OTHERWISE MOVE BEHIND A PARKED VEHICLE. THE LOCATION OF | | | THE PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES WITHIN THE | | | UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE REQUIRES APPROVAL FROM THE | | | BUILDING DEPARTMENT. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 3.) A DETAILED EXPLANATION IS NEEDED ON HOW THE PARKING | | | GARAGE WILL FUNCTION FOR THE RESIDENTS AND | | | NON-RESIDENTS OF THE PROJECT, SPECIFICALLY: THERE ARE A | | | NUMBER OF TANDEM PARKING SPACES WHICH SEEM ONLY | | | REASONABLE FOR THE OCCUPANTS OF THE BUILDING(S) TO | | | UTILIZE. HOW WILL THESE SPACES BE RESERVED/IDENTIFIED | | | FOR RESIDENTIAL PARKING ONLY, ETC.; PLEASE ENSURE THAT | | | THERE IS SUFFICIENT PARKING FOR EACH USE (I.E. THEATRE, | | | RETAIL, RESTAURANT) THAT WILL BE ACCESSIBLE TO THE | | | PATRONS/GENERAL PUBLIC (I.E. EXCESS TO THE TANDEM | | | PARKING). STAFF?S PARKING CALCULATION SEEM TO INDICATE | | | THAT THERE IS INSUFFICIENT PARKING FOR THE COMMERCIAL | | | USES. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 4.) WHAT IS THE OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHT FOR THE EL | | | CORDOVA BUILDING? THERE SEEMS TO BE A DISCREPANCY | | | WITHIN THE PLANS (I.E. IS IT 64.67 FT. PER SHEET A-2.01 | | | OR IS IT 68.67 FT. PER SHEET A-3.01). PLEASE CLARIFY AS | | | THE BUILDING HEIGHT MAY IMPACT THE REQUIRED SETBACKS | | | FOR THE BUILDING. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 5.) WHAT IS THE HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED DECORATIVE | | | FINIALS. DECORATIVE FEATURES MAY NOT EXCEED THE | | | DISTRICT HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS BY 10%. [ZLDR S.94-306] | | | [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 6.) PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY ARCHITECTURAL PLANS MOVING | | | FORWARD TO A PUBLIC HEARING SHALL BE SIGNED, DATED AND | | | SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | | | | SIGNAGE COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) NO INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED ON SIGNAGE. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE INFORMATION ON HOW SIGNAGE WILL BE HANDLED FOR | | | THE PROJECT (I.E. SIGNAGE PROGRAM, ETC.). [6/11/2019 | | | REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | | | | PHOTOMETRICS/LIGHTING PLAN COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) ANY SOURCE OF ILLUMINATION LOCATED WITHIN A | | | COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD) DISTRICT SHALL NOT | | | EXCEED ONE-FOOT CANDLE AT OR BEYOND THE BOUNDARIES OF | | | SUCH DEVELOPMENT. THE PROJECT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THIS | | | REQUIREMENT. [ZLDR S.94-209(D)(8)] [6/11/2019 REPEAT | | | COMMENT] | | | | | | 2.) THE PHOTOMETRICS HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED ALONG ALL | | | BOUNDARIES (INSIDE AND OUT) OF THE PROJECT. PLEASE | | | ADDRESS SO THAT STAFF CAN EVALUATE THE ILLUMINATION FOR | | | CONSISTENCY WITH THE ZLDRS. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 3.) ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE | | | GLARE AND SHALL BE ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE | | | AWAY FROM ALL ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT | | | RESIDENCES, OR PUBLIC THOROUGHFARE. PLEASE PROVIDE | | | INFORMATION HOW THIS REQUIREMENT WILL BE ADDRESSED. | | | [ZLDR S.94-309(A)] [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | * CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF | | | FIFTEEN (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 | | | INCHES X 11 INCHES, AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 | | | INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600.00). | | | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE | | | QUESTIONS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-11-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
06-11-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
llouie |
Date |
06-11-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-06-11 14:47:28 | GENERAL COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING REQUIRED INFORMATION | | | IN THE SUBMITTED 2019 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: PROJECT | | | LOCATION: MISSING 2100 S. DIXIE HIGHWAY AS AN ADDRESS; | | | 309 BARCELONA ROAD IS LISTED IN THE PROJECT LOCATION. | | | HOWEVER, THIS ADDRESS IS NOT A PART OF THE PROJECT | | | SCOPE. PLEASE REMOVE THIS ADDRESS FROM THE APPLICATION; | | | NEED SEPARATE SHEET IDENTIFYING ALL PARCEL CONTROL | | | NUMBERS (PCNS) ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT, PER THE | | | APPLICATION; 2100 SDH, LLC IS MISSING AS A PROPERTY | | | OWNER. A SIGNED OWNERS CONSENT FORM FROM THIS PROPERTY | | | OWNER IS REQUIRED; APPLICATION SHALL BE SIGNED AND | | | DATED BY THE APPLICANT; THE OWNERS CONSENT FORM FOR | | | 2000 SDH, LLC, MUST IDENTIFY ALL PCNS AND ATTACH LEGAL | | | DESCRIPTION. | | | | | | 2.) PLEASE REVISE THE JUSTIFICATION LETTER (DATED | | | 5/14/2019) TO ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING INCONSISTENCIES: | | | THE INTRODUCTION ON PAGE 1 REFERENCES THE REQUEST FOR | | | THE APPROVAL OF A FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT | | | (FLUMA). THE FLUMA DOES NOT APPLY; CHECK THE EXISTING | | | USES IN THE USE TABLE ON PAGE 2. (SPECIFICALLY, THE | | | EXISTING USES TO THE WEST I.E. GREENE SCHOOL); THE | | | HISTORY SECTION ON PAGES 2 AND 3 DOES NOT SEEM TO | | | REFLECT THE CORRECT OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHT (OVERALL | | | BUILDING HEIGHT IS NOT 69 FT. AS NOTED); IN THE | | | VISIONING SECTION ON PAGES 3 AND 4, THE SUMMARY SEEMS | | | TO EXCLUDE THE PURCHASE OF 2020 SOUTH DIXIE HWY. THIS | | | PARCEL SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE SUMMARY, AS THE PARCEL | | | IS PART OF THE PROPOSED CPD. ALSO, PLEASE CLARIFY IF | | | ALL 58 UNITS (INCLUDING THE TOWNHOUSES) WILL BE | | | RENTALS; IN THE CPD AND SITE PLAN SECTION ON PAGES 7 | | | AND 8: PLEASE ENSURE TOWNHOUSES ARE ALSO PROPOSED IN | | | THE DEVELOPMENT (VERBIAGE SEEMS TO IMPLY ONLY APARTMENT | | | UNITS); CHECK THE BREAKDOWN OF THE PROPOSED INTENSITY | | | ON PAGE 8 (I.E. TABULATION FOR PARKING DOES NOT MATCH | | | THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN); IN THE | | | PARKING AND CIRCULATION SECTION ON PAGES 8 AND 9: | | | PARKING NUMBERS DO NOT MATCH THE NUMBERS PROVIDED IN | | | THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE CHECK CALCULATIONS. MORE | | | INFORMATION IS REQUIRED FOR PARKING CIRCULATION AND HOW | | | THAT FUNCTIONS WITH THE VALET PARKING. IT STATES IN THE | | | LETTER THAT PARKING WILL BE OPEN TO THE NON-COMMERCIAL | | | PUBLIC. WHAT ARE THE ASSURANCES THAT THE PROJECT WILL | | | ALWAYS MAINTAIN SUFFICIENT PARKING FOR THE USES WITHIN | | | AND HAVING THE ABILITY TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PARKING | | | FOR OTHERS; PER ZLDR S.94-207(B)(1), THE PROPOSED | | | PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SHALL COMPLY WITH S.94-35(C), | | | S.94-33, ARTICLE XII AND ARTICLE XVII. PLEASE PROVIDE | | | THE RESPONSES FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE ZLDRS; IN THE | | | COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD) STANDARDS ON PAGES | | | 11 AND 12, #8 MAKES REFERENCES TO AN INDUSTRIAL PLANNED | | | DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. PLEASE CORRECT; THE WAIVERS | | | SECTION ON PAGES 12-17 DOES NOT PROVIDE MUCH | | | INFORMATION ON THE MITIGATION MEASURES FOR EACH WAIVER | | | REQUEST. STAFF NEEDS TO KNOW WHAT MEASURES ARE BEING | | | MADE TO REDUCE THE IMPACT(S) OF EACH WAIVER REQUEST. | | | | | | 3.) A TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW LETTER | | | FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION IS | | | REQUIRED. THE LETTER SHALL STATE THAT THE PROPOSED | | | PROJECT MEETS THE TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OF THE | | | COUNTY, PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE PROJECT FOR A PUBLIC | | | HEARING. | | | | | | 4.) A SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION (SCAD) | | | LETTER FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY IS | | | REQUIRED PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE PROJECT FOR A PUBLIC | | | HEARING. | | | | | | 5.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE CITY'S PUBLIC | | | UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR | | | WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE | | | COLLECTION SERVICES. | | | | | | 6.) PROVIDE LETTERS FROM THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC UTILITIES | | | CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH | | | INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE | | | PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, FPU, FPL AND | | | COMCAST. | | | | | | 7.) AN UPDATED ADDRESS LIST AND RADIUS MAP OF ALL | | | PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FT. OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY | | | IS MISSING FROM THE APPLICATION AND SHALL BE PROVIDED | | | TO STAFF FOR THE FILE. PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THERE ARE | | | OVER 50 ENVELOPES, THE APPLICANT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE | | | FOR MAILING OUT THE REQUIRED NOTICES. | | | | | | 8.) A MASSING STUDY AS WELL AS CROSS SECTIONS OF THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT IN RELATIONSHIP TO THE | | | IMMEDIATE/SURROUNDING AREAS/BUILDINGS IS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 9.) A PREDETERMINATION LETTER FROM THE FLORIDA | | | DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) IS REQUIRED FOR THE | | | PROPOSED CHANGES ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY. | | | | | | 10.) PLANS HAVE A LARGE AMOUNT OF DATA AND NEEDS TO BE | | | MADE CLEAR BY AVOIDING ANY TEXT OVERLAP, ETC. | | | | | | 11.) PLEASE BE SURE TO INCLUDE THE REVISION DATE TO THE | | | REVISED SHEETS TO KEEP TRACK OF ALL CHANGES TO THE | | | PROJECT. | | | | | | | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) PER ZLDR SECTION 94-145(11), THE FAR INCLUDES | | | AIR-CONDITIONED OR FULLY ENCLOSED STORAGE SPACES, | | | ENCLOSED AREAS ON THE ROOFTOP SUCH AS BATHROOMS AND | | | LOBBIES, STAIRS AND ELEVATOR AREAS, AND EXTERNAL | | | UNENCLOSED CIRCULATION AREAS. THE FLOOR AREA RATIO | | | (FAR) CALCULATION FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT APPEARS TO | | | BE INCORRECT, AS CERTAIN SPACES (I.E. STAIRS, | | | ELEVATORS, ETC.) HAVE BEEN EXCLUDED FROM THE FAR (AS | | | PROVIDED IN THE SITE DATA NOTES). THE FAR CANNOT EXCEED | | | 1.5. PLEASE ADDRESS. [ZLDR S.94-243, TABLE VIII-3] | | | | | | 2.) WHAT IS THE SETBACK DISTANCE FROM THE EXTENT OF THE | | | UNDERGROUND GARAGE TO THE PROPERTY LINE? THE | | | UNDERGROUND GARAGE SEEMS TO EXTEND CLOSER TO THE | | | PROPERTY LINE THAN THE ABOVE GROUND STRUCTURES FOR BOTH | | | BUILDINGS AND NO DIMENSIONS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED FOR THIS | | | SETBACK. THE UNDERGROUND STRUCTURE IS A PART OF THE | | | BUILDING AND THEREFORE, THE SETBACKS SHALL BE MEASURED | | | FROM THE EXTENT OF THE UNDERGROUND GARAGE (CLOSEST | | | POINT) TO THE PROPERTY LINES. | | | | | | 3.) PARKING/LOADING CONFIGURATION WHICH REQUIRE BACKING | | | DIRECTLY ONTO A STREET FROM A PARKING OR LOADING SPACE | | | FOR MORE THAN TWO (2) RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND ALL | | | NON-RESIDENTIAL USES SHALL BE PROHIBITED IN ALL | | | RESIDENTIAL AND NON-RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS. THE | | | LOADING AREA WITHIN THE EL FLAMINGO BUILDING SEEM TO | | | REQUIRE VEHICLES TO BACK OUT INTO THESE PROHIBITED | | | ZONES. PLEASE ADDRESS. [ZLDR S.94-485(J)(1)] | | | | | | 4.) ARE THE IMPROVEMENTS ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY | | | CONSISTENT WITH THE SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY CORRIDOR | | | IMPROVEMENT PLAN? PLEASE MEET WITH THE CITY'S | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT TO COORDINATE AND | | | ADDRESS. | | | | | | 5.) STAFF IS REQUESTING THE APPLICANT ACCOMMODATE AN 8 | | | FT. HIGH CONCRETE WALL ALONG THE REAR PROPERTY LINES OF | | | BOTH PARCELS (EL FLAMINGO AND EL CORDOVA) TO HELP | | | MITIGATE THE IMPACT OF THE PROJECT NEXT TO THE EXISTING | | | RESIDENTIAL USES. | | | | | | 6.) THE PROPOSED VALET BULLPEN SEEMS TO BE IN CONFLICT | | | WITH THE DESIGNATED LANES FOR INTERNAL CIRCULATION. | | | PLEASE ADDRESS. | | | | | | 7.) THE CIVIL PLAN SHOWS THE LOCATION OF WATER METERS | | | NEAR THE ACCESS/EXIT POINTS OF THE BUILDINGS. PLEASE | | | SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE WATER METERS IN THE PLAN AND | | | PROVIDE A DETAIL. THE DETAIL IS REQUIRED TO ENSURE THAT | | | THE METER(S) WILL NOT IMPACT VISIBILITY AND APPROPRIATE | | | SCREENING MEASURES ARE IMPLEMENTED. | | | | | | 8.) HOW FAR DO THE BALCONIES EXTEND INTO THE | | | SETBACK(S)? BALCONIES CANNOT ENCROACH MORE THAN 3 FT. | | | INTO ANY SETBACK. PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS TO | | | DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENCY. [ZLDR S.94-305(B)(2)] | | | | | | 9.) ALL ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (I.E. HVAC | | | EQUIPMENT) SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW. PLEASE PROVIDE | | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION/ILLUSTRATION TO HOW THE PROJECT | | | WILL COMPLY WITH THIS REQUIREMENT. | | | | | | 10.) THE EXISTING USE WEST OF THE EL FLAMINGO BUILDING | | | IS A PRIVATE SCHOOL (NOT AUTO SALES, AS SPECIFIED IN | | | THE PLAN). PLEASE ADDRESS FOR ACCURACY. | | | | | | 11.) THE EXISTING USES WEST OF THE EL CORDOVA BUILDING | | | SEEMS TO BE AN ART GALLERY AND RESTAURANT, AND PARKING | | | LOT ASSOCIATED WITH THE GREENE SCHOOL. PLEASE ADDRESS | | | FOR ACCURACY. | | | | | | 12.) PLEASE LABEL ALL BUILDING SETBACKS IN THE PLAN. | | | | | | 13.) A STALL STRIPING DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE | | | PLAN. | | | | | | 14.) BICYCLE PARKING IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO ZLDR | | | S.94-485(9). PLEASE ADDRESS. A BICYCLE PARKING DETAIL | | | IS ALSO REQUIRED IN THE PLAN. | | | | | | 15.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE SITE DATA | | | TABULAR: APPLICATION NUMBER: PB 1712C/Z19050024; | | | RECALCULATION OF FAR REQUIRED; PROPOSED NUMBER OF | | | DWELLING UNITS FOR THE PROJECT IS 58 (NOT 56); | | | RECALCULATION OF REQUIRED AND PROPOSED PARKING | | | REQUIRED. THE PARKING CALCULATIONS SEEM TO BE | | | INCORRECT. ADDITIONALLY, THE PARKING COUNT DOES NOT | | | MATCH THE PARKING CALCULATIONS PROVIDED IN THE | | | ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS; PROPOSED PARKING SHOULD INCLUDE | | | THE VALET PARKING CALCULATIONS (SINCE IT WILL NOT COUNT | | | TOWARDS REQUIRED PARKING); PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING FOR | | | THE PROJECT; PROVIDE THE LANDSCAPE/PERVIOUS SURFACE | | | AREA CALCULATION (REQUIRED AND PROPOSED) IN SQUARE | | | FEET; RECALCULATE LOADING SPACE REQUIREMENT. SEEMS TO | | | BE INCORRECT; CHECK THE NUMBER OF BUILDING STORIES | | | PROVIDED IN THE TABULAR (TABLE INDICATE 7 STORIES. | | | HOWEVER, PLANS SEEM TO SHOW 4 STORIES ABOVE GROUND). | | | | | | 16.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS TABULAR: PER ZLDR ARTICLE VIII, THE MINIMUM | | | IMPERVIOUS SURFACE REQUIREMENT IS 85% (NOT 80%). THIS | | | MAY IMPACT THE WAIVER REQUEST FOR THE IMPERVIOUS | | | SURFACE REQUIREMENT; THE LANGUAGE IN THE NOTE AT THE | | | BOTTOM OF THE TABLE IS NOT CONSISTENT. | | | | | | 17.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE | | | SETBACKS/SEPARATIONS TABULAR: REQUIRED SETBACK | | | CALCULATIONS ARE INCORRECT. THIS NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED | | | AS IT WILL IMPACT THE WAIVER REQUESTS TO THE REQUIRED | | | SETBACKS; IT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A LEGEND TO | | | IDENTIFY WHAT "N" AND "S" MEANS. | | | | | | 18.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE WAIVER CHART: | | | REQUIRED SETBACKS ARE INCORRECT AND WILL NEED TO BE | | | CORRECTED AS IT WILL IMPACT THE WAIVERS REQUESTED; THE | | | REQUIRED MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA IS 85% (NOT | | | 80%). CALCULATIONS WILL NEED TO BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY. | | | | | | 19.) THE SITE DATA TABULAR INDICATES A TOTAL OF THREE | | | (3) LOADING ZONES PROVIDED; HOWEVER, ONLY TWO (2) HAVE | | | BEEN COUNTED IN THE PLAN. PLEASE ADDRESS. | | | | | | 20.) SHOW THE WIDTH OF THE ROADWAY FOR ALL PUBLIC | | | STREETS IN THE PLAN (I.E. FLAMINGO, BARCELONA, CORDOVA, | | | ETC.) | | | | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL (FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS): | | | | | | 1.) PROVIDE PLANS ILLUSTRATING WHAT SPACES IN THE | | | PROPOSED BUILDINGS ARE COUNTED IN THE FAR CALCULATIONS | | | (I.E. USE SHADING/HATCHING, ETC.); ALSO PROVIDE THE | | | DETAILED CALCULATIONS FOR EACH FLOOR. | | | | | | 2.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE PARKING GARAGE | | | PLANS (SHEETS A-1.07 AND A-1.08): PARKING CALCULATIONS | | | SEEM TO BE INCORRECT; DIMENSION OUT THE STALLS, AISLES, | | | WALKWAYS AND DRIVE AISLES; THERE SEEMS TO BE MORE | | | COMPACT PARKING SPACES COUNTED THEN NOTED IN THE PLANS; | | | DIMENSION OUT THE 2 FT. CURB OVERHANG; ARE WHEEL STOPS | | | PROVIDED FOR THE STALLS? IF SO, PLEASE ILLUSTRATE; PER | | | ZLDR S.94-485(O), ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE | | | LOCATED SO THAT USERS ARE NOT COMPELLED TO WALK OR | | | OTHERWISE MOVE BEHIND A PARKED VEHICLE. THE LOCATION OF | | | THE PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES WITHIN THE | | | UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE REQUIRES APPROVAL FROM THE | | | BUILDING DEPARTMENT. | | | | | | 3.) A DETAILED EXPLANATION IS NEEDED ON HOW THE PARKING | | | GARAGE WILL FUNCTION FOR THE RESIDENTS AND | | | NON-RESIDENTS OF THE PROJECT, SPECIFICALLY: THERE ARE A | | | NUMBER OF TANDEM PARKING SPACES WHICH SEEM ONLY | | | REASONABLE FOR THE OCCUPANTS OF THE BUILDING(S) TO | | | UTILIZE. HOW WILL THESE SPACES BE RESERVED/IDENTIFIED | | | FOR RESIDENTIAL PARKING ONLY, ETC.; PLEASE ENSURE THAT | | | THERE IS SUFFICIENT PARKING FOR EACH USE (I.E. THEATRE, | | | RETAIL, RESTAURANT) THAT WILL BE ACCESSIBLE TO THE | | | PATRONS/GENERAL PUBLIC (I.E. EXCESS TO THE TANDEM | | | PARKING). STAFF?S PARKING CALCULATION SEEM TO INDICATE | | | THAT THERE IS INSUFFICIENT PARKING FOR THE COMMERCIAL | | | USES. | | | | | | 4.) WHAT IS THE OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHT FOR THE EL | | | CORDOVA BUILDING? THERE SEEMS TO BE A DISCREPANCY | | | WITHIN THE PLANS (I.E. IS IT 64.67 FT. PER SHEET A-2.01 | | | OR IS IT 68.67 FT. PER SHEET A-3.01). PLEASE CLARIFY AS | | | THE BUILDING HEIGHT MAY IMPACT THE REQUIRED SETBACKS | | | FOR THE BUILDING. | | | | | | 5.) WHAT IS THE HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED DECORATIVE | | | FINIALS. DECORATIVE FEATURES MAY NOT EXCEED THE | | | DISTRICT HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS BY 10%. [ZLDR S.94-306] | | | | | | 6.) PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY ARCHITECTURAL PLANS MOVING | | | FORWARD TO A PUBLIC HEARING SHALL BE SIGNED, DATED AND | | | SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT. | | | | | | | | | SIGNAGE COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) NO INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED ON SIGNAGE. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE INFORMATION ON HOW SIGNAGE WILL BE HANDLED FOR | | | THE PROJECT (I.E. SIGNAGE PROGRAM, ETC.). | | | | | | | | | PHOTOMETRICS/LIGHTING PLAN COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1.) ANY SOURCE OF ILLUMINATION LOCATED WITHIN A | | | COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD) DISTRICT SHALL NOT | | | EXCEED ONE-FOOT CANDLE AT OR BEYOND THE BOUNDARIES OF | | | SUCH DEVELOPMENT. THE PROJECT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THIS | | | REQUIREMENT. [ZLDR S.94-209(D)(8)] | | | | | | 2.) THE PHOTOMETRICS HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED ALONG ALL | | | BOUNDARIES (INSIDE AND OUT) OF THE PROJECT. PLEASE | | | ADDRESS SO THAT STAFF CAN EVALUATE THE ILLUMINATION FOR | | | CONSISTENCY WITH THE ZLDRS. | | | | | | 3.) ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE | | | GLARE AND SHALL BE ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE | | | AWAY FROM ALL ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT | | | RESIDENCES, OR PUBLIC THOROUGHFARE. PLEASE PROVIDE | | | INFORMATION HOW THIS REQUIREMENT WILL BE ADDRESSED. | | | [ZLDR S.94-309(A)] | | | | | | | | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: | | | | | | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | * CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF | | | FIFTEEN (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 | | | INCHES X 11 INCHES, AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 | | | INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. | | | | | | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600.00). | | | | | | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE | | | QUESTIONS. | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |