 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z19050020
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z19050020 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-11-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
06-11-2019 |
Time |
20:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
06-11-2019 |
Time |
20:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-06-11 20:17:23 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THE PLANS DO | | | NOT SHOW ANY ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. UNDER THE FAIR | | | HOUSING ACT 2% OF THE RESIDENTIAL PARKING SPACES SHALL | | | BE ACCESSIBLE. FOR THE BUSINESS OCCUPANCY AREA, THE | | | MINIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED | | | SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 208.2 OF FLORIDA | | | ACCESSIBILITY CODE. | | | | | | 3. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PER SECTION | | | 208.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING | | | SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE | | | OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE | | | ENTRANCE. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL | | | COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE. | | | | | | 4. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PER SECTION 208.2.4 | | | OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX | | | REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING | | | STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND DESIGNED IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY | | | CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT | | | SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE) | | | | | | 5. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE AISLE. ACCESSIBLE PARKING | | | SPACE ACCESS AISLES SHALL BE LOCATED SO THAT THE USER | | | IS NOT COMPELLED TO WALK OR WHEEL BEHIND ANOTHER PARKED | | | VEHICLE OR IN THE TRAVEL LANE. THE ACCESS AISLES SHALL | | | ALSO COMPLY WITH THE OTHER PROVISIONS OF SECTION OF | | | 502.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE. | | | | | | 6. ACCESS FROM PARKING GARAGE TO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. THE | | | ACCESS GOES ACROSS THE LANDING FOR STAIR 2, BUT THE | | | DOORS ARE TOO CLOSE TOGETHER FOR A WHEELCHAIR USER TO | | | GO THROUGH. PER SECTION 404.2.6 OF FLORIDA | | | ACCESSIBILITY CODE, THE DISTANCE BETWEEN TO HINGED | | | DOORS SHALL BE 48 INCHES CLEAR BETWEEN THE DOOR SWINGS. | | | | | | 7. BUILDING SIZE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR | | | THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, | | | AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 8. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES | | | NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO | | | MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL | | | BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE | | | EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED | | | TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR | | | OTHER APPROVED METHODS. | | | | | | 9. GREASE INTERCEPTOR. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR WILL BE | | | REQUIRED. PLEASE CONTACT JEFFREY ODOMS, UTILITIES O&M | | | SUPERINTENDENT, PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT, FATS OILS | | | AND GREASE DIVISION, AT (561) 822-2172, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | 10. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, | | | GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND | | | OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS, | | | SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 11. CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND | | | CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF | | | CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. | | | | | | 12. PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER | | | AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY, | | | INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE | | | CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF | | | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION | | | THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY. | | | | | | 13. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT | | | TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE | | | ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP | | | ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC | | | PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-11-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
06-11-2019 |
Time |
19:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
06-11-2019 |
Time |
19:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-06-11 20:02:49 | SEE REVIEW NO. 2 FOR BUILDING CODE COMMENTS RELATED TO | | | THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL. THE COMMENTS ENTER UNDER THIS | | | REVIEW WERE ENTERED UNDER THE WRONG DISCIPLINE BY THE | | | PLANNER AND ARE NOT RELATED TO BUILDING CODE | | | REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | | | 2019-06-10 17:00:44 | 1. THE PROJECT CANNOT PROCEED TO DOWNTOWN ACTION | | | COMMITTEE UNTIL THE DETAILS OF THE RESTRICTIVE COVENANT | | | AND AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (JULY 19, | | | 2004) ARE RESOLVED. PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF THE | | | DOCUMENTS, SUBJECT TO LEGAL INTERPRETATION, IDENTIFY | | | THE FOLLOWING: | | | A. CONSTRUCTION OF FOR-SALE RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM | | | UNITS ON ALL FLOORS ABOVE THE GROUND FLOOR OF THE | | | PROJECT. | | | B. ANY BUILDING CONSTRUCTED ON THE PROPERTY SHALL | | | CONTAIN A FULL SERVICE PHARMACY ON THE GROUND FLOOR NO | | | LESS THAN 1500 GROSS SF IN SIZE FOR A TERM OF 3 YEARS. | | | C. DEVELOPER SHALL CONSTRUCT 100 PUBLIC PARKING SPACES | | | TO BE LOCATED ON LOWER 2 FLOORS OF PROJECT, SEPARATED | | | FROM THE PARKING SERVING OTHER ELEMENTS OF THE PROJECT | | | PLEASE ADDRESS THE INTENT OF THE APPLICANT IN REGARDS | | | TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE RESTRICTIVE COVENANT AND | | | DEVELOPER AGREEMENT IN THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT UPON | | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | 2. THE PROJECT SHALL OBTAIN DAC APPROVAL OF A CLASS B | | | LICENSE FOR A TYPE III GROUP HOMES . | | | 3. FOR GROUP HOMES PERMITTED AS A CLASS B SPECIAL USE, | | | A GROUP HOME FACILITY SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF | | | 1,200 FEET FROM ANOTHER SUCH FACILITY. A VARIANCE FROM | | | THIS PROVISION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS LOCATION. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION FROM VARIANCE IN | | | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. | | | 4. PER SECTION 94-54(A)(3), FORMAL SITE PLAN APPROVALS | | | INVOLVING THE TDR PROGRAM SHALL BE APPROVED BY DAC AND | | | THE CERTIFICATE OF TRANSFER SHALL BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO | | | THE EXPIRATION OF THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL. | | | 5. PLEASE INCLUDE THE AMOUNT OF TDRS NEEDED FOR THE | | | SITE (SQUARE FEET) AND THE AMOUNT OF SF GRANTED BY | | | RIGHT IN THE PROJECT DATA TABLE. | | | 6. PROJECT SHALL REQUIRE DAC SPECIAL REVIEW AND | | | VARIANCE REVIEW. WITH SUBMITTAL FOR VARIANCE REVIEW, | | | PLEASE RESPOND TO THE CRITERIA FOR VARIANCE REQUESTS | | | FOR EACH REQUESTED VARIANCE, SEPARATELY, AS ESTABLISHED | | | IN SECTION 94-38(D)(6). | | | 7. PLEASE CONDENSE THE TWO SEPARATE SITE PLANS SHEET | | | SP-1 AND SP.1 INTO ONE SITE PLAN. PLEASE SHOW GROUND | | | FLOOR USES, WITH THE OUTLINE OF UPPER LEVELS, SETBACK | | | DIMENSIONS, EXISTING CURB LINE, ALL APPLICABLE | | | DIMENSIONS, AND OTHER REQUIRED INFORMATION. PLEASE | | | ILLUSTRATE ADJACENT BUILDING FRONTAGES AND CURB LINES | | | ACROSS DIXIE HIGHWAY, DATURA STREET AND THE ALLEYWAY. | | | 8. THE PROPOSED DROP-OFF DOES NOT MEET THE FOLLOWING | | | REQUIREMENTS: | | | A. DESIGNATED PASSENGER LOADING AND DROP-OFF AREAS | | | SHALL OCCUR WITHIN THE FOOTPRINT OF THE BUILDING | | | ENVELOPE AND SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY | | | TRAFFIC ENGINEER. | | | B. CURB CUTS FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS SHALL BE NO MORE | | | THAN 25 FEET, MEASURED AT THE CURB LINE. | | | C. CAR QUEUING SHALL OCCUR INTERNAL TO THE LOT AND | | | SHALL NOT INTERFERE WITH PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION ON A | | | PUBLIC SIDEWALK. THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE DROP OFF | | | INTERFERES WITH PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION. | | | D. FOR REFERENCE, ?TYPE A? PORTE COCHERES SHALL BE | | | ALLOWED FOR HOTELS IN THIS DISTRICT. | | | STAFF RECOMMENDS CONSIDERING UTILIZING THE EXISTING | | | GARAGE ENTRANCE OFF OF THE ALLEYWAY FOR COVERED DROP | | | OFF. | | | 9. IF VALET IS PROPOSING UTILIZING EXISTING OR PROPOSED | | | ON-STREET PARKING FOR VALET, THE APPLICANT SHALL PAY | | | FOR THE USE OF THOSE OCCUPIED SPACES IN AMOUNT AS | | | ESTABLISHED BY THE CITY AND IN LOCATIONS APPROVED BY | | | THE CITY PARKING ADMINISTRATOR. THIS WOULD UTILIZE | | | EXISTING ON-STREET PARKING SPACES AND NOT INTERFERE | | | WITH SIDEWALK CONNECTIVITY. | | | 10. PLEASE INDICATE THE PROPOSED DIRECTION OF THE | | | ALLEY. MANY BUSINESSES ON CLEMATIS STREET USE THIS | | | ALLEY FOR PARKING AND GARBAGE COLLECTION, WHICH WILL BE | | | CONSIDERED IN THE DESIGN INTENT. | | | 11. THE APPLICANT SHALL WORK WITH PUBLIC WORKS | | | REGARDING THE EXISTING DUMPSTER THAT IS LOCATED WITHIN | | | THE PROPERTY AND USED BY BUSINESSES ON THE 400 BLOCK OF | | | CLEMATIS STREET. | | | 12. PLEASE PROVIDE TURN MOVEMENTS FOR ENTERING AND | | | EXITING THE PARKING GARAGE TO ENSURE THE TURNS CAN WORK | | | SAFELY. | | | 13. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT PALM TRAN FOR PROPOSAL TO | | | REMOVE/RELOCATE OF BUS SHELTER. STAFF RECOMMENDS THE | | | USE OF THE EXISTING SHELTER LOCATED SOUTH OF THE | | | PROPERTY AT 499 EVERNIA STREET (BROADSTONE). IF PALM | | | TRAN DOES NOT PERMIT RELOCATION OF BUS STOP TO THIS | | | LOCATION, THE APPLICANT SHALL REPLACE WITH A NEW BUS | | | SHELTER, MEETING PALM TRAN STANDARDS. | | | 14. APPLICANT SHALL REQUIRE FDOT APPROVAL FOR ANY WORK | | | DONE ON QUADRILLE BOULEVARD. | | | 15. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH THE CITY ENGINEERING | | | DEPARTMENT ON THE PROPOSED DATURA STREET REDESIGN THAT | | | IS CURRENTLY IN INITIAL DESIGN PHASE. | | | 16. THE PROPOSED UNDER COVER AREA ON THE GROUND FLOOR | | | DOES NOT MEET THE DEFINITION OF COLONNADE FOR THE DMP | | | AREA AND DOES NOT FIT INTO THE CONTEXT OF THE DIRECT | | | AREA. STAFF RECOMMENDS ELIMINATION OF THE COLONNADE AS | | | IT DOES NOT ACTIVATE THE PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT AND | | | DOES NOT IMPROVE ACTIVE USE OR TRANSPARENCY ALONG THE | | | SIDEWALK. | | | 17. ARE ALL USES ON THE GROUND FLOOR PRIVATE? PLEASE | | | CLARIFY WHICH USES ARE OPEN TO PUBLIC, IF ANY OR | | | ACCESSIBLE FROM THE STREET. | | | 18. STAFF HAS CONCERN WITH THE SETBACK OF THE GROUND | | | FLOOR USES ON THE WEST SIDE OF DATURA STREET, AS IT | | | DOES NOT PROVIDE FOR ACTIVATED PEDESTRIAN SPACE AND | | | INTERACTION WITH THE STREET AS OTHER RESIDENTIAL | | | BUILDINGS DO WITHIN THE DMP AREA. | | | 19. IN ORDER TO COUNT TANDEM PARKING SPACES AS TWO | | | SPACES, A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR | | | CONFIRMATION OF A VALET ATTENDANT IN CHARGE OF THE | | | OPERATION OF THE PARKING FACILITY DURING ALL OPERATING | | | HOURS. | | | 20. PLEASE NOTE, THE PARKING REQUIRED FOR THE | | | INDEPENDENT LIVING UNITS MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR | | | RESIDENTIAL USES WITHIN THE DMP WHICH IS MINIMUM 1 PER | | | UNIT PLUS 1 PER 20 UNITS FOR GUEST PARKING, MAXIMUM 2 | | | PER UNIT PLUS 1 PER 20 UNITS FOR GUEST PARKING. PLEASE | | | SEPARATE PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING | | | FROM ASSISTED LIVING AND MEMORY CARE AND DETERMINE | | | NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES REQUESTED FOR THE WAIVER. THE | | | WAIVER CANNOT EXCEED 50% OF THE REQUIRED PARKING FOR | | | THE PROJECT. | | | 21. PER SECTION 94-481(F): | | | A. TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR THE SENIOR HOUSING PARKING | | | WAIVER, CRITERIA MUST BE MET. PLEASE RESPOND TO THE | | | CRITERIA. | | | B. IF THE PARKING WAIVER IS GRANTED, A RESTRICTIVE | | | COVENANT RESTRICTING THE USE OF THE PROPERTY TO SERVING | | | PERSONS WHO ARE 55 YEARS AND OLDER FOR A PERIOD OF NOT | | | LESS THAN 15 YEARS SHALL BE EXECUTED AND RECORDED. | | | 22. PLEASE SUBMIT PLANS ILLUSTRATING THE TRANSPARENCY | | | REQUIREMENTS PER TABLE IV-50: BUILDING REQUIREMENTS- | | | CWD 10-12 STORY RECEIVING SITES (SECTION 94-134). | | | 23. PLEASE PROVIDE DATA ON BUILDING FOOTPRINT MAXIMUM | | | IN SITE TABLE PER TABLE IV-50. | | | 24. THE PROJECT DOES NOT MEET ACTIVE USE LINER | | | REQUIREMENTS ALONG QUADRILLE BOULEVARD AND DATURA | | | STREET. PLEASE ADDRESS VARIANCE CRITERIA IN THE | | | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. | | | 25. CONSIDERING THE PROPOSED VARIANCES, PLEASE EVALUATE | | | THE USE OF ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL MATERIALS, CONSIDER | | | THE PROPORTIONS OF THE BUILDING, ESPECIALLY REFINING | | | THE PARKING GARAGE DESIGN. PLEASE TAKE INTO | | | CONSIDERATION THE REDESIGN BASED ON REMOVAL OF THE | | | ARCADE PORTIONS (SEE COMMENT #16). | | | 26. THE SUBMITTED JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT STATES THAT | | | THE PROPOSED PLAN ADHERES TO ALL SETBACK REQUIREMENTS; | | | HOWEVER THE REQUIRED PARKING SETBACK FOR 2 AND 3 STORY | | | ALONG DATURA STREET IS NOT MET. PLEASE ADJUST TO MEET | | | SETBACK REQUIREMENT. | | | 27. FOR SETBACK MEASUREMENTS, WHERE A CURB LOCATION | | | VARIES ALONG A PROPERTY, THE BACK OF CURB SHALL BE | | | DEFINED AS THE PREDOMINANT BACK OF CURB LINE FURTHEST | | | FROM THE CENTER LINE OF THE ROAD. PLEASE ADJUST SETBACK | | | MEASUREMENTS ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY TO REFLECT THIS. | | | 28. THE PROPOSED PRIVATE OPEN SPACE USE ALONG QUADRILLE | | | BOULEVARD IS NOT AN EFFECTIVE USE OF OPEN SPACE. STAFF | | | RECOMMENDS SHIFTING THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT TO THE WEST | | | TO BETTER ALIGN WITH THE FOOTPRINT OF THE ADJACENT | | | BROADSTONE BUILDING AND UTILIZE MORE OPEN SPACE ALONG | | | DIXIE HIGHWAY, TO INCREASE PEDESTRIAN ACTIVE SPACE. | | | 29. PLEASE PRESERVE THE EXISTING CEMENT CANOPY ON SITE, | | | PER CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNER. THIS COULD BE | | | MAINTAINED WITHIN THE OPEN SPACE. | | | 30. THE PROPOSED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE ALONG DATURA STREET | | | CANNOT COUNT AS PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, PER THE DEFINITION | | | OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. STAFF RECOMMENDS UTILIZING SOME | | | SPACE ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY. | | | 31. THE PROPOSED CANOPY EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL | | | PROJECTION FOR CANOPIES. PER SECTION TABLE IV-5, THE | | | MAXIMUM PROJECTION FOR CANOPIES IS 20 FEET WITH A 12 | | | FOOT MAXIMUM ENCROACHMENT INTO THE ROW. PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE PROPOSED HEIGHT OF THE CANOPY, THE MINIMUM HEIGHT | | | FROM SIDEWALK GRADE IS 10 FEET. | | | 32. THE QUADRILLE BOULEVARD ELEVATION DOES NOT | | | ILLUSTRATE THE EXTENT OF THE PROPOSED CANOPY. PLEASE | | | ADD TO SHOW ADJUSTED CANOPY SIZE PER COMMENT #31. | | | 33. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DETAIL OF ARCHITECTURAL | | | TREATMENT MATERIALS ON BUILDING ON ELEVATION PLANS. | | | 34. TREE GRATES ARE NOT NECESSARY WHERE THERE IS | | | SUFFICIENT SIDEWALK WIDTH ADJACENT TO THE PROPOSED | | | TREE. PLEASE REMOVE TREE GRATES AND USE PLANTING BEDS | | | (CONSIDER 6X4 BEDS) WHERE GRATES ARE PROPOSED. | | | 35. PLEASE PROVIDE OAK TREES OR SIMILAR SHADE TREES AT | | | CORNER OF QUADRILLE AND DATURA AND DIXIE AND DATURA AS | | | THIS IS WHERE PEDESTRIANS WAIT FOR STREET CROSSINGS. | | | 36. PLEASE CHECK CRITERIA FOR FDOT SIGHT TRIANGLE FOR | | | PROPOSED TREES AT STREET CORNERS. | | | 37. THE PROPOSED EXFILTRATION TRENCH RUNS WHERE TREES | | | ARE PROPOSED. PLEASE REVIEW AND ADJUST AS NECESSARY. | | | 38. PLEASE PROVIDE A HARDSCAPE PLAN WITH DETAILS OF | | | PAVERS, SEATING, ETC. | | | 39. PLEASE SEE TABLE IV-7 FOR OPEN SPACE STANDARDS. | | | CURRENTLY THE PASSAGEWAY PUBLIC OPEN TYPEIS REQUIRED. | | | STAFF IS CURRENTLY REVIEWING THIS REQUIREMENT FOR | | | APPLICABILITY FOR THIS SITE. | | | 40. PLEASE ADDRESS SPECIFIC PRIVATE AND PUBLIC OPEN | | | SPACE REQUIREMENTS PER TABLE IV-6 AND TABLE IV-7, | | | INCLUDING TYPE OF OPEN SPACE (COURTYARD GARDEN, | | | TERRACE, ETC.) FOR EACH OPEN SPACE AND SEE THE | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR VEGETATED SPACE, SEATING, ETC. | | | 41. PLEASE PROVIDE ILLUSTRATIONS SHOWING PLANAR BREAK | | | REQUIREMENTS AS REQUIRED BY TABLE IV-4: FA?ADE | | | ARTICULATION REQUIREMENTS. | | | 42. PER SECTION 94-111: PARKING AND LOADING | | | REQUIREMENTS, A MINIMUM THREE-FOOT BACK UP AREA SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED AT THE TERMINUS OF ANY DEAD-END DRIVE AISLE | | | TO ALLOW FOR VEHICLES TO SAFELY PULL OUT OF THE END | | | PARKING SPACES. IN ADDITION, THE EQUIVALENT OF ONE | | | PARKING SPACE AT THE TERMINUS OF A DEAD-END AISLE SHALL | | | BE STRIPED AS DEDICATED PULL-IN AREA FOR TURNING | | | AROUND. | | | 43. PLEASE PROVIDE TYPICAL PARKING SPACE AND AISLE | | | WIDTH DIMENSIONS ON EACH FLOOR. PLEASE NOTE, IN THOSE | | | CASES WHERE THE SIDE OF ANY STALL IS ADJACENT TO A WALL | | | OR COLUMN, THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A | | | MINIMUM OF ONE FOOT. WHERE THERE IS AN OBSTRUCTION ON | | | BOTH SIDES OF THE STALL THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE | | | INCREASE BY A MINIMUM OF TWO FEET. PLEASE DIMENSION | | | THIS ADDITIONAL ONE/TWO FOOT. | | | 44. PER SECTION 94-111, ONE BICYCLE PARKING SPACE SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED PER EVERY 15 REQUIRED PARKING SPACES, IN A | | | SECURE AREA, COVERED FROM THE ELEMENTS. | | | 45. PER SECTION 93-113, BICYCLE PARKING FOR THE PUBLIC | | | SHALL BE PROVIDED AT A MINIMUM OF ONE SPACE PER EVERY | | | 100 FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE. THE POST AND LOOP RACK IS | | | RECOMMENDED FOR THE PUBLIC ROW. PLEASE INDICATE EXACT | | | BICYCLE RACK DETAIL ON PLANS. | | | 46. PLEASE INCLUDE SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS OF BICYCLE | | | RACKS ON THE SITE PLAN. THE POLE SHALL BE NO FURTHER | | | THAN THREE FEET FROM THE EDGE OF CURB MAINTAINING A | | | MINIMUM FIVE FOOT CLEARANCE FOR PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION. | | | 47. PLEASE INDICATE LOCATION OF PROPOSED UTILITIES | | | INCLUDING THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER, FDC CONNECTION, FPL | | | TRANSFORMER, ETC. STAFF RECOMMENDS LOCATING THE | | | UTILITIES WITHIN THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT AND PROVIDING | | | ACCESS TO UTILITY COMPANIES, TO KEEP OFF THE PUBLIC | | | ROW. ALTERNATIVELY, UTILITIES CAN BE LOCATED ALONG THE | | | ALLEY SIDE OF THE BUILDING. SUFFICIENT LANDSCAPE | | | SCREENING IS REQUIRED WHEN UTILITIES ARE LOCATED | | | OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING AND WITHIN THE ROW. A MINIMUM | | | OF 5 FOOT SIDEWALK CLEARANCE MUST BE MAINTAINED AT ALL | | | LOCATIONS. | | | 48. THE CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANS SHOW PARKING SPACES | | | THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE ADJUST | | | ACCORDINGLY. | | | 49. THE MINIMUM FOOTCANDLE, AS MEASURED AT THE BACK | | | EDGE OF THE CURB AND ONE FOOT ABOVE THE SIDEWALK IS 0.6 | | | AND THE MAXIMUM IS 1.0 FOOTCANDLE. PLEASE ADJUST | | | PHOTOMETRICS EXTENDING TO THE ROADWAY CENTERLINES AND | | | PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE PROPOSED LIGHT FIXTURES AS | | | NECESSARY. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH THE ENGINEERING | | | DEPARTMENT TO USE THE CITY APPROVED LIGHT FIXTURE. A | | | SPECIFIC FIXTURE IS REQUIRED FOR ALL ROW. | | | 50. PLEASE PROVIDE PROPOSED PHOTOMETRICS FOR THE | | | PARKING GARAGE, MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION | | | 86-294. | | | 51. EACH ENTRANCE SHOULD HAVE ITS OWN ADDRESS WHICH IS | | | USED BY 911 EMERGENCY SERVICES. THE EXISTING PRIMARY | | | ADDRESS WHICH WILL BE RETIRED WHEN THE PROJECT IS | | | COMPLETE. THERE WILL SEPARATE ADDRESSES FOR THE MAIN | | | LOBBY AND FOR THE MEMORY CARE LOBBY. THE OWNER CAN PICK | | | WHICH WILL BE THE PRIMARY ADDRESS SEEN ON PAPA. CONTACT | | | MICHAEL ORIO AT [email protected] WITH ANY QUESTIONS. | | | 52. APPLICANT SHALL BE REQUIRED TO MEET REQUIREMENTS OF | | | ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER AT | | | [email protected] FOR MORE INFORMATION. | | | 53. PLEASE BE ADVISED, APPLICANTS ARE NOW REQUIRED TO | | | PRESENT THEIR CASE TO THE BOARDS INCLUDING DAC AND | | | INCLUDE RESPONSES TO CRITERIA FOR SPECIAL REVIEW, | | | VARIANCES, ETC. STAFF WILL PROVIDE COMMENT FOR ITEMS | | | NOT ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT. PRESENTATIONS ARE TO BE | | | SUBMITTED TO STAFF THE MONDAY PRIOR TO THE DAC MEETING | | | BY MEANS OF ELECTRONIC OR FLASH DRIVE DELIVERY. | | | | | | | | | LIZ LEVESQUE, URBAN DESIGN PLANNER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-1426 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
10-16-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
10-16-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
10-16-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-10-16 09:46:08 | PASSED WITH PROVISOS: | | | | | | FOR ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL - | | | | | | 1. PLEASE LABEL ALL UTILITIES - MATERIAL, SIZE, | | | PROPOSED OR EXISTING, ETC. | | | 2. PLEASE PROVIDE SMALL UTILITY EASEMENT FOR WATER | | | METER; EXCLUDE BACKFLOWS FROM EASEMENT (BACKFLOWS MUST | | | BE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY OUTSIDE OF EASEMENT). | | | 3. ENLARGED UTILITY DETAIL IS DIFFICULT TO READ. | | | 4. RELOCATE 90 DEGREE WATER JOINTS OUTSIDE OF RIGHT OF | | | WAY ON TO PROJECT PROPERTY; WATER CONNECTIONS FROM CITY | | | POINT OF SERVICE SHOULD RUN DIRECTLY PERPENDICULAR FROM | | | WATER MAIN TO SITE. | | | 5. PLEASE ADD NOTE FOR CONTRACTOR TO HAND DIG/POT HOLE | | | AROUND EXISTING UTILITIES. | | | 6. PLEASE SHOW DIRECTION OF FLOW FOR STORMWATER AND | | | SANITARY LINES. | | | 7. PLEASE LABEL CITY POINT OF SERVICE FOR UTILITY | | | CONNECTIONS AND LABEL WATER LINES AS PRIVATE WHERE | | | APPLICABLE. | | | 8. UNABLE TO LOCATE CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAILS P-3, | | | P-6, WS-6, WS-10 (PREVIOUS COMMENT). | | | | | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | CONCERNS, THANKS. | | | | | | RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX | | | 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 MOBILE: (561) 246-9525 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-29-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
08-29-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
08-29-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-08-29 12:50:06 | PASSED WITH PROVISOS: | | | | | | FOR ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL: | | | | | | PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS FOR FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. | | | | | | PLEASE ADD NOTE FOR PAVEMENT RESTORATION (100?) ON | | | UTILITY PLAN WHERE THE WATER TAP IS TO BE PERFORMED PER | | | CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-9. | | | | | | PLEASE SHOW CONSTRUCTION OF DUMPSTER TO BE IN | | | COMPLIANCE WITH CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8. | | | | | | PLEASE SHOW OVERHEAD CLEARANCE DIMENSIONS WHERE | | | PROPOSED DUMPSTER IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED. | | | | | | PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED | | | UNDERGROUND FRANCHISED UTILITIES, INCLUDING FIBER | | | OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & | | | TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED IN THE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY. (FRANCHISED UTILITIES WERE NOT SHOWN ON | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS.) | | | | | | PROVIDE CLEARANCES AT ALL UTILITY (SANITARY, WATER, | | | STORMWATER) CROSSINGS. | | | | | | PROVIDE SEWER TIE-IN INVERT ELEVATION. | | | | | | SHOW DOWNSTREAM SEWER FROM CONNECTION ONTO DIXIE HWY. | | | | | | CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY | | | ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY | | | RIGHT OF WAY. | | | | | | CALL OUT SIZE OF EXISTING WATER SERVICE TO BE CUT OFF | | | AT 12 IN. WATER MAIN. | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND | | | IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED | | | AREAS. (NOT SHOWN ON SITE PLAN SUBMITTED WITH | | | RESPONSE.) | | | | | | RELOCATE WATER METER BOX OUT OF SIDEWALK, ON PROPERTY, | | | IN A DEDICATED EASEMENT. BACKFLOW TO BE AS CLOSE TO | | | METER AS POSSIBLE (OUTSIDE OF EASEMENT). | | | | | | REMOVE BACKFLOW SHOWN NORTH OF PROPOSED 90 DEGREE BEND | | | IN WATER SERVICE. | | | | | | PLEASE CALL OUT NUMBER OF FEET OF PIPE RESTRAINT PER | | | CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL P-3. | | | | | | PLEASE CROSS-REFERENCE ALL CROSS SECTIONS WITH THEIR | | | CORRESPONDING SHEETS. | | | | | | ADD CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAILS P-3, P-6, WS-6, WS-10. | | | | | | CLEARLY SHOW RIGHT OF WAY AND PROPERTY LINES. | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT VIDEO WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED BEFORE | | | AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION BUT IS NOT REQUIRED AT THIS | | | TIME. | | | | | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | CONCERNS, THANKS. | | | | | | RICK ROSSANO | | | PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 | | | MOBILE: (561) 246-9525 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-07-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
06-07-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
2.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
06-07-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-06-07 07:30:38 | THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HAS A NUMBER OF REGULATIONS | | | AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS WHICH DIRECTLY AFFECT THE | | | DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION OF WATER AND WASTEWATER | | | UTILITIES WITHIN THE CITY. PLEASE SEE DEVELOPMENT | | | PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AT THE LINK BELOW: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/CMSPAGES/GETAMAZONFILE.ASPX?PATH=~\WPB_W | | | EBSITE\MEDIA\ENGINEERING\DEVELOPMENT-APPLICATION-FULL-P | | | ACKAGE_2016.PDF&HASH=7BD4DD7EB6115181D8C5977BCC02A97B19 | | | 60045731D3658206F27451722716EF | | | THIS AND OTHER RELATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS CAN BE | | | FOUND HERE: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR | | | MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA, | | | CODIFIED THROUGH ORD. NO. 4183-08, ADOPTED SEPT. 22, | | | 2008. (SUPPLEMENT NO. 18) | | | | | | CHAPTER 90 UTILITIES, ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL, | | | SEC. 90-7. POLICY REGARDING EXTENSION OF WATER OR SEWER | | | SERVICE FACILITIES OF THE CITY. | | | | | | THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENTS AND THE | | | CONSTRUCTION PERMITS ADDRESS RESERVATION OF CAPACITY | | | BASED ON USAGE, METER SIZE AND FEES, DESIGN STANDARDS, | | | BACKFLOW PREVENTION, FIRE SERVICE AND IRRIGATION. | | | | | | PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED | | | DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM AND PEAK) | | | AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PER FAC | | | 64E-6 FOR SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER. | | | | | | PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND | | | DRAINAGE ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE. DEVELOPER TO | | | PROVIDE CCTV, NOT CITY (UPDATE NOTE). | | | PLEASE SUBMIT A FORMAL AS-BUILT REQUEST FOR ALL CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH-OWNED UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT | | | OF WAY FOR THE ENTIRE EXTENT OF THE LIMITS OF YOUR | | | PROJECT. IDENTIFY TYPE OF UTILITY, LOCATION, PIPE | | | MATERIAL, AGE AND SIZE. PLEASE CONTACT JANICE TARBILL | | | IN THE WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT | | | [email protected] OR 561-494-1079 FOR FURTHER | | | ASSISTANCE. NOTE THAT FIELD RECORDS ARE FOR INFORMATION | | | ONLY. FIELD VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS USING FIELD | | | SURVEY, POT-HOLING, SOFT DIGS ETC. | | | | | | AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | | STATING "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD-FREE". FOR | | | MORE INFORMATION, REFER TO THE LINK BELOW: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI | | | CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL | | | | | | PLANS SHALL SHOW PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF | | | ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES, | | | INCLUDING STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND | | | SANITARY SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, | | | METERS, AND OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE | | | SYSTEM, CATCH BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING | | | GRADES, PIPES SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, | | | ASSUMPTIONS, CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL | | | INLETS AND MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER | | | LINES. ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE | | | PROFILE VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN | | | VIEW ON PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. | | | ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND | | | PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER | | | OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & | | | TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES AT ALL | | | UTILITY CROSSINGS. | | | | | | SHOW VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION INFORMATION | | | (NAVD 88 AND NGVD 29). | | | | | | CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY | | | ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY | | | RIGHT OF WAY. | | | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE | | | DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF CITY OF WPB | | | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION). | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND | | | IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED | | | AREAS. | | | | | | PROVIDE ENLARGED DETAIL ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION | | | OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION. | | | | | | PROVIDE UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED | | | WATER METERS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY WATER UTILITY | | | PERSONNEL. | | | | | | PROVIDE ONSITE CLEANOUTS AT PROPERTY LINE FOR PROPOSED | | | SANITARY LATERALS. | | | | | | PROVIDE SANITARY MANHOLE AT POINT OF SERVICE. | | | | | | WATER SERVICES SHALL BE PIPED STRAIGHT INTO THE | | | PROPERTY AVOIDING BENDS OR ANGLED CONNECTIONS. | | | | | | COORDINATE DIRECTLY WITH TINU PENA AT ENGINEERING | | | SERVICES/CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SECTION REGARDING | | | STREETSCAPE ALONG DATURA FROM QUADRILLE TO DIXIE. | | | | | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | CONCERNS, THANKS. | | | | | | RICK ROSSANO | | | PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 | | | MOBILE: (561) 246-9525 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING | | | | | | MANNY GONZALEZ | | | SENIOR ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1085 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 | | | MOBILE: (561) 644-7301 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING | | | | | | CENTRAL OPERATIONS CENTER (DISPATCH): | | | 24-HOUR EMERGENCY RESPONSE SERVICES TO PUBLIC | | | UTILITIES, PUBLIC WORKS, PARKS, ETC. 561-822-2210 | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-22-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
08-22-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
08-22-2019 |
Time |
14:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-08-22 14:52:21 | 2ND REVIEW RESPONSE | | | | | | AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC INFORMATION PACKET AND | | | RESPONSE LETTER DATED AUGUST 19, 2019, FROM INSITE | | | STUDIO, TO LIZ LEVESQUE, URBAN DESIGN PLANNER, THE | | | PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS | | | HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | | | THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES | | | NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT | | | THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-31-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
05-31-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
05-31-2019 |
Time |
13:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-05-31 13:13:51 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | THERE APPEARS TO BE MULTIPLE OCCUPANCIES PER THE FFPC, | | | WILL IT BE MIXED, SEPARATED OR NON-SEPARATED OCCUPANCY. | | | | | | IS THE PROPOSED A HIGH RISE? THE MEASURMENT SHOWN IS | | | 72' 8" TO THE 8TH FLOOR; HOWEVER, THE MEASURMENT IS | | | INDICATED FROM A SIDEWALK. | | | | | | PER NFPA 101 | | | | | | 3.3.36.7* HIGH-RISE BUILDING. A BUILDING WHERE THE | | | FLOOR OF AN OCCUPIABLE STORY IS GREATER THAN 75 FT (23 | | | M) ABOVE THE LOWEST LEVEL OF FIRE DEPARTMENT VEHICLE | | | ACCESS. | | | | | | THE MEASURMENT SHOULD TAKE IN CONSIDERATION THE ROAD | | | LEVEL. | | | | | | PLEASE REVIEW AND ADJUST EMENTS ACCORDINGLY TO VERIFY | | | UNDER/OVER 75 FT. | | | | | | 6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A, | | | PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE, | | | INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE | | | OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES) | | | | | | 7. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA | | | 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS | | | STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE | | | BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE | | | BEING CONSTRUCTED. | | | | | | SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, | | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU | | | PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION. | | | | | | 6.4.5.4* FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED | | | NOT MORE THAN 100 FT (30.5 M) FROM THE NEAREST FIRE | | | HYDRANT CONNECTED TO AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY. | | | | | | 18.3 WATER SUPPLIES. | | | 18.3.1* AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING | | | THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED TO ALL PREMISES UPON WHICH FACILITIES, | | | BUILDINGS, OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS ARE HEREAFTER | | | CONSTRUCTED OR MOVED INTO THE JURISDICTION. THE | | | APPROVED WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | SECTION 18.4. | | | | | | PER NFPA 14 SECTION 7.12.2, HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS SHALL | | | HAVE AT LEAST TWO REMOTELY LOCATED FIRE DEPARTMENT | | | CONNECTIONS FOR EACH ZONE. | | | | | | PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004, | | | FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE | | | POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF | | | APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT, | | | CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR | | | AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER | | | SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA) | | | AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS | | | PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS. | | | FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE | | | PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES? | | | | | | | | | 7A) A FIRE PUMP ROOM COULD NOT BE IDENTIFIED AND IS | | | MSOT LIKELY REQUIRED FOR THIS STURCTURE. | | | | | | | | | 8. A CLASS A NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM | | | SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP | | | DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY | | | INSTALLATION. | | | | | | 9. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7 | | | KEYWAY SYSTEM. | | | | | | ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTERS | | | EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA | | | B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS. | | | | | | ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN | | | WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL | | | LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET | | | MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER | | | ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN | | | AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE | | | IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION. | | | | | | 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED | | | ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE | | | BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND | | | FDCS SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET | | | OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER | | | ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES. | | | | | | TWO REMOTELY LOCATED FDCS FOR EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT | | | FIREGROUND OPERATIONS ARE REQUESTED. PLEASE COORDINATE | | | THE LOCATIONS WITH THE OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL. | | | | | | 12. COMMAND ROOM - REQUIRED FOR HIGH RISE | | | | | | THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1, | | | CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN | | | THE FOLLOWING FEATURES: | | | | | | A. SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 200 FT SQUARED WITH A MINIMUM | | | DIMENSION OF 10 FT. | | | B. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM. | | | C. A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED | | | ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM | | | D. SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL | | | FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF | | | EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING | | | EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS AND THE LOCATION | | | OF FIRE WALLS, FIRE BARRIERS, FIRE PARTITIONS, SMOKE | | | BARRIERS AND SMOKE PARTITIONS | | | E. A WORK TABLE. | | | F. IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN | | | FOR THE BUILDING. | | | G. THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | | | CONTROL UNIT. | | | H. ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION OF | | | THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL | | | I. STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR DISTRIBUTION | | | SYSTEMS. | | | J. CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS SIMULTANEOUSLY | | | K. SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY | | | PANELS | | | L. EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS | | | M. FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS | | | N. GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND | | | TRANSFER FEATURES. | | | O. PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED | | | BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE | | | P. CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL | | | Q. ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME | | | A17.1. | | | R. ELEVATOR EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER SELECTOR | | | SWITCH(ES), WHERE EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER IS | | | PROVIDED | | | 11.8.6* EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER. | | | 11.8.6.1 AN EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL BE PROVIDED | | | IN A | | | LOCATION APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. | | | 11.8.6.2 THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL CONTAIN THE | | | FOLLOWING: | | | (1) VOICE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM PANELS AND CONTROLS | | | (2) FIRE DEPARTMENT TWO-WAY TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION | | | SERVICE | | | PANELS AND CONTROLS WHERE REQUIRED BY ANOTHER SECTION | | | OF THIS | | | CODE | | | (3) FIRE DETECTION AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM ANNUNCIATION | | | PANELS | | | (4) ELEVATOR FLOOR LOCATION AND OPERATION ANNUNCIATORS | | | (5) ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME | | | A17.1/CSA B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS AND ESCALATORS | | | (6) ELEVATOR EMERGENCY POWER SELECTOR SWITCH(ES) WHERE | | | PROVIDED | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME A17.1/CSA B44 | | | (7) SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATERFLOW ANNUNCIATORS | | | (8) EMERGENCY GENERATOR STATUS INDICATORS | | | (9) CONTROLS FOR ANY AUTOMATIC STAIRWAY DOOR UNLOCKING | | | SYSTEM | | | (10) FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS | | | (11) TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED | | | ACCESS TO THE | | | PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM | | | (12) STAIRWAY VIDEO MONITORING EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED BY | | | 11.8.8 | | | | | | | | | 13. RADIO | | | | | | NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY | | | RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES. | | | 11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM | | | RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT | | | COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL | | | DETERMINED BY THE AHJ. | | | NFPA 72, 24.5.2* TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS | | | ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS. | | | 24.5.2.2 RADIO COVERAGE. RADIO COVERAGE SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE BUILDING AS A PERCENTAGE OF | | | FLOOR AREA AS SPECIFIED IN 24.5.2.2.1 THROUGH | | | 24.5.2.2.3. | | | 24.5.2.2.1 CRITICAL AREAS. CRITICAL AREAS, SUCH AS THE | | | EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER(S), THE FIRE PUMP ROOM(S), | | | EXIT STAIRS, EXIT PASSAGEWAYS, ELEVATOR LOBBIES, | | | STANDPIPE CABINETS, SPRINKLER SECTIONAL VALVE | | | LOCATIONS, AND OTHER AREAS DEEMED CRITICAL BY THE | | | AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH | | | 99 PERCENT FLOOR AREA RADIO COVERAGE. | | | 24.5.2.2.2 GENERAL BUILDING AREAS. GENERAL BUILDING | | | AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH 90 PERCENT FLOOR AREA | | | RADIO COVERAGE. | | | 24.5.2.3 SIGNAL STRENGTH. | | | 24.5.2.3.1 INBOUND. A MINIMUM INBOUND SIGNAL STRENGTH | | | OF -95 DBM, OR OTHER SIGNAL STRENGTH AS REQUIRED BY THE | | | AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL BE PROVIDED | | | THROUGHOUT THE COVERAGE AREA. | | | 24.5.2.3.2 OUTBOUND. A MINIMUM OUTBOUND SIGNAL STRENGTH | | | OF -95 DBM AT THE DONOR SITE, OR OTHER SIGNAL STRENGTH | | | AS REQUIRED BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED FROM THE COVERAGE AREA. | | | | | | THE SYSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL | | | STRENGTH OF -95 DBM FOR THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST | | | PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE. TESTING SHALL BE BY AN | | | ACCEPTABLE NATIONAL STANDARD DOCUMENTING PERCENTAGES | | | NOTED ABOVE AND BY ACTUAL RADIO TESTING BY FIRE | | | PERSONNEL. IF THE MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A | | | BI-DIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH | | | A MINIMUM 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP. | | | | | | 14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS | | | BUILDING. | | | ANY GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS, | | | PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS. | | | | | | 15. THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM, IF APPLICABLE, SHALL | | | COMPLY WITH NFPA 101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND | | | FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING: | | | | | | THE SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED, | | | INSPECTED, TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | NFPA 92, STANDARD FOR SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEMS; NFPA 204, | | | STANDARD FOR SMOKE AND HEAT VENTING; OR NATIONALLY | | | RECOGNIZED STANDARDS, ENGINEERING GUIDES, OR | | | RECOMMENDED PRACTICES, AS APPROVED BY THE AUTHORITY | | | HAVING JURISDICTION. | | | THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE | | | INTENT OF THE SYSTEM, THE DESIGN METHOD USED, THE | | | APPROPRIATENESS OF THE METHOD USED, AND THE REQUIRED | | | MEANS OF INSPECTING, TESTING, AND MAINTAINING THE | | | SYSTEM. | | | ACCEPTANCE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A SPECIAL | | | INSPECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.9. | | | | | | 16. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 17. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-10-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
02-10-2020 |
Time |
12:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
02-10-2020 |
Time |
12:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-10 12:47:25 | | | | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 401 DATURA RESIDENTIAL Z19050020 | | | FEBRUARY 10, 2020 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN: | | | ? SATISFIED. THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN NEEDS TO MATCH | | | THE LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY AND USE THE SAME | | | REFERENCE NUMBERS. | | | ? SATISFIED. TREE SPECIES ARE MISIDENTIFIED ON THE | | | LIST. CORRECT THE SPECIES. | | | TREE #24 IS A WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTA | | | ? SATISFIED. TREES AND PALMS CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE TO | | | BE MITIGATED BASED ON CATEGORY. ANY TREES 20 FEET OR | | | MORE CANOPY DIAMETER TO BE MITIGATED BY ACTUAL SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE. | | | ONLY TREE #1 IS 20 FEET OR MORE CANOPY DIAMETER. | | | MITIGATION IS 380 SQ FT. | | | #22 AND 23 ARE DOUBLE WASHINGTONIA PALMS. CATEGORY 4 | | | ARE 50 SQ FT EACH, SO EACH DOUBLE IS 100 SQ FT CANOPY | | | REMOVED. | | | ALL OAKS AND 2 REMAINING BLACK OLIVE TREES ARE CATEGORY | | | 1 TREES AT 300 SQ FT EACH CANOPY REMOVED. | | | EAST PALATKA HOLLIES #2, 3, 5, AND 6 AND SILVER TRUMPET | | | #7 ARE CATEGORY 2 AND ARE EACH 150 SQ FT CANOPY | | | REMOVED. | | | | | | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF | | | MITIGATION FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE | | | REMOVED. | | | CORRECT ALL MITIGATION VALUES FOR THE ABOVE COMMENTS | | | AND ADD TOTAL FOR MITIGATION DUE. | | | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION VALUES BY CATEGORY | | | FOR THE PROPOSED TREES AND PALMS. | | | REMOVE NOTE FOR TREE MITIGATION CALCULATED AT | | | PERMITTING. MITIGATION IS BASED ON CATEGORY LIST | | | PROVIDED. LIST EACH SPECIES AND CATEGORY AND TOTAL | | | MITIGATION VALUE. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. THE STREETSCAPE CAN BE IMPROVED TO | | | ACCOMPLISH THE INTENT OF THE CODE SECTION 94-113. THE | | | ROYAL PALMS MAY BE USED, BUT NOT AS COUNTING TOWARD THE | | | TREE REQUIREMENT AT THE MAXIMUM 30 FOOT SPACING. ADD | | | CANOPY TREES AS REQUIRED. | | | CALCULATE TREE REQUIREMENT ON S DIXIE (4) AND MEET | | | REQUIREMENTS WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY. OPEN SPACE TREE | | | CANOPY ADJACENT TO THIS AREA NEEDS TO BE DESIGNED TO | | | COMPLEMENT REQUIRED STREET TREE CANOPY COVERAGE. | | | 12/18 THERE SHOULD BE 2 TREES NORTH OF THE PARKING, AND | | | 2 TREES SOUTH OF THE PARKING IN PLANTER AREA ADJACENT | | | TO THE CURB. | | | THE EXISTING HOLLIES ARE NOT IN GOOD CONDITION AND | | | SHOULD BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH LIVE OAKS TO MATCH | | | THE STREET PATTERN TO THE SOUTH. TWO TREES TO THE NORTH | | | OF THE PARKING SPACES AND TWO TREES TO THE SOUTH WITH | | | THE PUBLIC SPACE LIVE OAK TREES PROVIDING THE CANOPY TO | | | THE CENTER PORTION. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. REQUIRED STREET TREES MUST MEET THE 20 | | | FOOT HEIGHT REQUIREMENT AT INSTALLATION. LIST OVERALL | | | HEIGHT ON PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE | | | TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR | | | RELOCATED. SUBMIT THE REASON EXISTING LIVE OAK TREES | | | CANNOT BE RELOCATED OR USED IN THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE. | | | EAST PALATKA HOLLIES #2, 3, 5, AND 6 ARE NOT IN GOOD | | | CONDITION AND ARE TO BE REMOVED. | | | LIVE OAK TREES #4, #20 AND 21 MAY BE RELOCATED TO THE | | | WEST SIDE OF QUADRILLE ROW TO REPLACE MISSING LIVE OAK | | | TREES. | | | THIS COMMENT TO BE RESOLVED WITH COMMENT #2 FOR | | | STREETSCAPE DESIGN. | | | CITY STAFF WILL EVALUATE LIVE OAK TREES FOR POSSIBLE | | | RELOCATION TO WEST SIDE OF QUADRILLE BLVD. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS SHOWN | | | ON SHEET MUST BE BROKEN DOWN TO SHOW THE REQUIRED | | | VEGETATED AREA AND ANY TREE CANOPY REQUIREMENT FOR EACH | | | AREA AS THE ALLOWED OPEN SPACE TYPE. TERRACE REQUIRES | | | 20% MINIMUM VEGETATED AREA. ROOFTOP GARDEN REQUIRES 30% | | | VEGETATED AREA AND 20% TREE CANOPY. TREE CANOPY VALUES | | | CAN BE FOUND IN SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-8. | | | AREAS ON THE GROUND LEVEL ARE NOT NAMED FOR OPEN SPACE | | | TYPE, AND REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT PROVIDED. TREE CANOPY | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE CREDITS ARE TO MATCH TABLE IV-8 FOR OPEN | | | SPACE. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. AREA LISTED AS POOL DECK ON LEVEL 5 IS | | | NOT AN OPEN SPACE TYPE. CLASSIFY AS A PERMITTED PRIVATE | | | OPEN SPACE TYPE (ROOFTOP GARDEN?) AND SHOW | | | REQUIREMENTS. | | | 7. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES ON | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN, ALSO LOCATIONS OF VALVES AND BACKFLOW | | | PREVENTERS AND FPL TRANSFORMERS. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS | | | REQUIRED TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF REQUIRED STRUCTURAL | | | SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE ADJACENT TO TREES. PROVIDE A | | | TYPICAL FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE STRUCTURAL SOIL. | | | VERTICAL DETAIL IS CORRECT, OVERHEAD TYPICAL IS | | | INCORRECT AND MUST MATCH THE VERTICAL DETAIL. PLANTING | | | AREAS AROUND STREET TREES MAY BE EXPANDED AS LONG AS | | | THE 8 FOOT SIDEWALK WIDTH IS MAINTAINED. THIS WILL | | | MINIMIZE THE AREAS OF STRUCTURAL SOIL REQUIRED UNDER | | | THE ADJACENT PAVED AREA. PROVIDING A SEPARATE EXHIBIT | | | CLEARLY SHOWING THE LOCATIONS OF THE PLANTING AREAS AND | | | STRUCTURAL SOIL IS REQUIRED FOR STAFF TO VERIFY | | | ADEQUATE PLACEMENT, AND IS HELPFUL LATER IN | | | CONSTRUCTION FOR BIDDING AND INSTALLATION PURPOSES. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. | | | PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT | | | MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF DROUGHT TOLERANT AND | | | NATIVE SPECIES ADDED BASED ON THE PROPOSED PLANT LIST. | | | MUST INCLUDE ADDED PLANT MATERIAL NOT JUST REQUIRED. | | | RECALCULATE AFTER ADJUSTMENTS FROM OTHER COMMENTS. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 9/6/19: | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. ARTIFICIAL TURF DOG WALKING AREA CANNOT | | | BE VIEWABLE FROM THE ROAD OR STREET PER SECTION 94-451, | | | SO MUST BE FENCED TO BLOCK VIEW. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENT 10/28/19: | | | 12. SATISFIED. THE PLACEMENT OF THE DRAINAGE FIELD | | | BENEATH THE TREES IN THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE HAS TO BE | | | ACCEPTABLE TO THE STORMWATER ENGINEER FOR THE CITY. | | | | | | MEETING IN NOVEMBER ESTABLISHED THAT EXFILTRATION WOULD | | | BE DESIGNED TO AVOID BEING DIRECTLY UNDER THE TREES IN | | | ORDER TO ALLOW FOR FUTURE MAINTENANCE WITHOUT | | | DESTROYING THE TREES. THIS IS NOT SHOWN ON THE | | | SUBMITTED PLAN. | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. THE SOUTHERN OAK TREE AT THE CORNER OF | | | QUADRILLE AND DATURA IS WITHIN THE FDOT SIGHTLINE. | | | CONFIRM THAT THIS WILL BE ALLOWED BY FDOT. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-18-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
12-18-2019 |
Time |
17:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
12-18-2019 |
Time |
17:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-12-18 17:04:56 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 401 DATURA RESIDENTIAL Z19050020 | | | DECEMBER 18, 2019 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN: | | | ? SATISFIED. THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN NEEDS TO MATCH | | | THE LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY AND USE THE SAME | | | REFERENCE NUMBERS. | | | ? SATISFIED. TREE SPECIES ARE MISIDENTIFIED ON THE | | | LIST. CORRECT THE SPECIES. | | | TREE #24 IS A WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTA | | | ? SATISFIED. TREES AND PALMS CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE TO | | | BE MITIGATED BASED ON CATEGORY. ANY TREES 20 FEET OR | | | MORE CANOPY DIAMETER TO BE MITIGATED BY ACTUAL SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE. | | | ONLY TREE #1 IS 20 FEET OR MORE CANOPY DIAMETER. | | | MITIGATION IS 380 SQ FT. | | | #22 AND 23 ARE DOUBLE WASHINGTONIA PALMS. CATEGORY 4 | | | ARE 50 SQ FT EACH, SO EACH DOUBLE IS 100 SQ FT CANOPY | | | REMOVED. | | | ALL OAKS AND 2 REMAINING BLACK OLIVE TREES ARE CATEGORY | | | 1 TREES AT 300 SQ FT EACH CANOPY REMOVED. | | | EAST PALATKA HOLLIES #2, 3, 5, AND 6 AND SILVER TRUMPET | | | #7 ARE CATEGORY 2 AND ARE EACH 150 SQ FT CANOPY | | | REMOVED. | | | | | | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF | | | MITIGATION FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE | | | REMOVED. | | | CORRECT ALL MITIGATION VALUES FOR THE ABOVE COMMENTS | | | AND ADD TOTAL FOR MITIGATION DUE. | | | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION VALUES BY CATEGORY | | | FOR THE PROPOSED TREES AND PALMS. | | | REMOVE NOTE FOR TREE MITIGATION CALCULATED AT | | | PERMITTING. MITIGATION IS BASED ON CATEGORY LIST | | | PROVIDED. LIST EACH SPECIES AND CATEGORY AND TOTAL | | | MITIGATION VALUE. | | | | | | 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE STREETSCAPE CAN BE IMPROVED | | | TO ACCOMPLISH THE INTENT OF THE CODE SECTION 94-113. | | | THE ROYAL PALMS MAY BE USED, BUT NOT AS COUNTING TOWARD | | | THE TREE REQUIREMENT AT THE MAXIMUM 30 FOOT SPACING. | | | ADD CANOPY TREES AS REQUIRED. | | | CALCULATE TREE REQUIREMENT ON S DIXIE (4) AND MEET | | | REQUIREMENTS WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY. OPEN SPACE TREE | | | CANOPY ADJACENT TO THIS AREA NEEDS TO BE DESIGNED TO | | | COMPLEMENT REQUIRED STREET TREE CANOPY COVERAGE. | | | 12/18 THERE SHOULD BE 2 TREES NORTH OF THE PARKING, AND | | | 2 TREES SOUTH OF THE PARKING IN PLANTER AREA ADJACENT | | | TO THE CURB. | | | THE EXISTING HOLLIES ARE NOT IN GOOD CONDITION AND | | | SHOULD BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH LIVE OAKS TO MATCH | | | THE STREET PATTERN TO THE SOUTH. TWO TREES TO THE NORTH | | | OF THE PARKING SPACES AND TWO TREES TO THE SOUTH WITH | | | THE PUBLIC SPACE LIVE OAK TREES PROVIDING THE CANOPY TO | | | THE CENTER PORTION. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. REQUIRED STREET TREES MUST MEET THE 20 | | | FOOT HEIGHT REQUIREMENT AT INSTALLATION. LIST OVERALL | | | HEIGHT ON PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE | | | TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR | | | RELOCATED. SUBMIT THE REASON EXISTING LIVE OAK TREES | | | CANNOT BE RELOCATED OR USED IN THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE. | | | EAST PALATKA HOLLIES #2, 3, 5, AND 6 ARE NOT IN GOOD | | | CONDITION AND ARE TO BE REMOVED. | | | LIVE OAK TREES #4, #20 AND 21 MAY BE RELOCATED TO THE | | | WEST SIDE OF QUADRILLE ROW TO REPLACE MISSING LIVE OAK | | | TREES. | | | THIS COMMENT TO BE RESOLVED WITH COMMENT #2 FOR | | | STREETSCAPE DESIGN. | | | CITY STAFF WILL EVALUATE LIVE OAK TREES FOR POSSIBLE | | | RELOCATION TO WEST SIDE OF QUADRILLE BLVD. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS SHOWN | | | ON SHEET MUST BE BROKEN DOWN TO SHOW THE REQUIRED | | | VEGETATED AREA AND ANY TREE CANOPY REQUIREMENT FOR EACH | | | AREA AS THE ALLOWED OPEN SPACE TYPE. TERRACE REQUIRES | | | 20% MINIMUM VEGETATED AREA. ROOFTOP GARDEN REQUIRES 30% | | | VEGETATED AREA AND 20% TREE CANOPY. TREE CANOPY VALUES | | | CAN BE FOUND IN SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-8. | | | AREAS ON THE GROUND LEVEL ARE NOT NAMED FOR OPEN SPACE | | | TYPE, AND REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT PROVIDED. TREE CANOPY | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE CREDITS ARE TO MATCH TABLE IV-8 FOR OPEN | | | SPACE. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. AREA LISTED AS POOL DECK ON LEVEL 5 IS | | | NOT AN OPEN SPACE TYPE. CLASSIFY AS A PERMITTED PRIVATE | | | OPEN SPACE TYPE (ROOFTOP GARDEN?) AND SHOW | | | REQUIREMENTS. | | | 7. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES ON | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN, ALSO LOCATIONS OF VALVES AND BACKFLOW | | | PREVENTERS AND FPL TRANSFORMERS. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS | | | REQUIRED TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF REQUIRED STRUCTURAL | | | SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE ADJACENT TO TREES. PROVIDE A | | | TYPICAL FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE STRUCTURAL SOIL. | | | VERTICAL DETAIL IS CORRECT, OVERHEAD TYPICAL IS | | | INCORRECT AND MUST MATCH THE VERTICAL DETAIL. PLANTING | | | AREAS AROUND STREET TREES MAY BE EXPANDED AS LONG AS | | | THE 8 FOOT SIDEWALK WIDTH IS MAINTAINED. THIS WILL | | | MINIMIZE THE AREAS OF STRUCTURAL SOIL REQUIRED UNDER | | | THE ADJACENT PAVED AREA. PROVIDING A SEPARATE EXHIBIT | | | CLEARLY SHOWING THE LOCATIONS OF THE PLANTING AREAS AND | | | STRUCTURAL SOIL IS REQUIRED FOR STAFF TO VERIFY | | | ADEQUATE PLACEMENT, AND IS HELPFUL LATER IN | | | CONSTRUCTION FOR BIDDING AND INSTALLATION PURPOSES. | | | | | | 10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION | | | 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF | | | PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF DROUGHT TOLERANT AND | | | NATIVE SPECIES ADDED BASED ON THE PROPOSED PLANT LIST. | | | MUST INCLUDE ADDED PLANT MATERIAL NOT JUST REQUIRED. | | | RECALCULATE AFTER ADJUSTMENTS FROM OTHER COMMENTS. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 9/6/19: | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. ARTIFICIAL TURF DOG WALKING AREA CANNOT | | | BE VIEWABLE FROM THE ROAD OR STREET PER SECTION 94-451, | | | SO MUST BE FENCED TO BLOCK VIEW. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENT 10/28/19: | | | 12. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE PLACEMENT OF THE DRAINAGE | | | FIELD BENEATH THE TREES IN THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE HAS TO | | | BE ACCEPTABLE TO THE STORMWATER ENGINEER FOR THE CITY. | | | | | | MEETING IN NOVEMBER ESTABLISHED THAT EXFILTRATION WOULD | | | BE DESIGNED TO AVOID BEING DIRECTLY UNDER THE TREES IN | | | ORDER TO ALLOW FOR FUTURE MAINTENANCE WITHOUT | | | DESTROYING THE TREES. THIS IS NOT SHOWN ON THE | | | SUBMITTED PLAN. | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. THE SOUTHERN OAK TREE AT THE CORNER OF | | | QUADRILLE AND DATURA IS WITHIN THE FDOT SIGHTLINE. | | | CONFIRM THAT THIS WILL BE ALLOWED BY FDOT. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-28-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
10-28-2019 |
Time |
16:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
10-28-2019 |
Time |
16:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-10-28 16:55:40 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 401 DATURA RESIDENTIAL Z19050020 | | | OCTOBER 28, 2019 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN: | | | ? SATISFIED. THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN NEEDS TO MATCH | | | THE LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY AND USE THE SAME | | | REFERENCE NUMBERS. | | | ? SATISFIED. TREE SPECIES ARE MISIDENTIFIED ON THE | | | LIST. CORRECT THE SPECIES. | | | TREE #24 IS A WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTA | | | ? SATISFIED. TREES AND PALMS CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE TO | | | BE MITIGATED BASED ON CATEGORY. ANY TREES 20 FEET OR | | | MORE CANOPY DIAMETER TO BE MITIGATED BY ACTUAL SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE. | | | ONLY TREE #1 IS 20 FEET OR MORE CANOPY DIAMETER. | | | MITIGATION IS 380 SQ FT. | | | #22 AND 23 ARE DOUBLE WASHINGTONIA PALMS. CATEGORY 4 | | | ARE 50 SQ FT EACH, SO EACH DOUBLE IS 100 SQ FT CANOPY | | | REMOVED. | | | ALL OAKS AND 2 REMAINING BLACK OLIVE TREES ARE CATEGORY | | | 1 TREES AT 300 SQ FT EACH CANOPY REMOVED. | | | EAST PALATKA HOLLIES #2, 3, 5, AND 6 AND SILVER TRUMPET | | | #7 ARE CATEGORY 2 AND ARE EACH 150 SQ FT CANOPY | | | REMOVED. | | | | | | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF | | | MITIGATION FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE | | | REMOVED. | | | CORRECT ALL MITIGATION VALUES FOR THE ABOVE COMMENTS | | | AND ADD TOTAL FOR MITIGATION DUE. | | | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION VALUES BY CATEGORY | | | FOR THE PROPOSED TREES AND PALMS. | | | REMOVE NOTE FOR TREE MITIGATION CALCULATED AT | | | PERMITTING. MITIGATION IS BASED ON CATEGORY LIST | | | PROVIDED. LIST EACH SPECIES AND CATEGORY AND TOTAL | | | MITIGATION VALUE. | | | | | | 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE STREETSCAPE CAN BE IMPROVED | | | TO ACCOMPLISH THE INTENT OF THE CODE SECTION 94-113. | | | THE ROYAL PALMS MAY BE USED, BUT NOT AS COUNTING TOWARD | | | THE TREE REQUIREMENT AT THE MAXIMUM 30 FOOT SPACING. | | | ADD CANOPY TREES AS REQUIRED. | | | CALCULATE TREE REQUIREMENT ON S DIXIE (4) AND MEET | | | REQUIREMENTS WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY. OPEN SPACE TREE | | | CANOPY ADJACENT TO THIS AREA NEEDS TO BE DESIGNED TO | | | COMPLEMENT REQUIRED STREET TREE CANOPY COVERAGE. | | | THE EXISTING HOLLIES ARE NOT IN GOOD CONDITION AND | | | SHOULD BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH LIVE OAKS TO MATCH | | | THE STREET PATTERN TO THE SOUTH. TWO TREES TO THE NORTH | | | OF THE PARKING SPACES AND TWO TREES TO THE SOUTH WITH | | | THE PUBLIC SPACE LIVE OAK TREES PROVIDING THE CANOPY TO | | | THE CENTER PORTION. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. REQUIRED STREET TREES MUST MEET THE 20 | | | FOOT HEIGHT REQUIREMENT AT INSTALLATION. LIST OVERALL | | | HEIGHT ON PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES | | | NATIVE TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE | | | OR RELOCATED. SUBMIT THE REASON EXISTING LIVE OAK TREES | | | CANNOT BE RELOCATED OR USED IN THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE. | | | EAST PALATKA HOLLIES #2, 3, 5, AND 6 ARE NOT IN GOOD | | | CONDITION AND ARE TO BE REMOVED. | | | LIVE OAK TREES #4, #20 AND 21 MAY BE RELOCATED TO THE | | | WEST SIDE OF QUADRILLE ROW TO REPLACE MISSING LIVE OAK | | | TREES. | | | THIS COMMENT TO BE RESOLVED WITH COMMENT #2 FOR | | | STREETSCAPE DESIGN. | | | CITY STAFF WILL EVALUATE LIVE OAK TREES FOR POSSIBLE | | | RELOCATION TO WEST SIDE OF QUADRILLE BLVD. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS SHOWN | | | ON SHEET MUST BE BROKEN DOWN TO SHOW THE REQUIRED | | | VEGETATED AREA AND ANY TREE CANOPY REQUIREMENT FOR EACH | | | AREA AS THE ALLOWED OPEN SPACE TYPE. TERRACE REQUIRES | | | 20% MINIMUM VEGETATED AREA. ROOFTOP GARDEN REQUIRES 30% | | | VEGETATED AREA AND 20% TREE CANOPY. TREE CANOPY VALUES | | | CAN BE FOUND IN SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-8. | | | AREAS ON THE GROUND LEVEL ARE NOT NAMED FOR OPEN SPACE | | | TYPE, AND REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT PROVIDED. TREE CANOPY | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE CREDITS ARE TO MATCH TABLE IV-8 FOR OPEN | | | SPACE. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. AREA LISTED AS POOL DECK ON LEVEL 5 IS | | | NOT AN OPEN SPACE TYPE. CLASSIFY AS A PERMITTED PRIVATE | | | OPEN SPACE TYPE (ROOFTOP GARDEN?) AND SHOW | | | REQUIREMENTS. | | | 7. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES ON | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN, ALSO LOCATIONS OF VALVES AND BACKFLOW | | | PREVENTERS AND FPL TRANSFORMERS. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS | | | REQUIRED TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES. | | | | | | 9. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF REQUIRED | | | STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE ADJACENT TO TREES. | | | PROVIDE A TYPICAL FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STRUCTURAL SOIL. | | | VERTICAL DETAIL IS CORRECT, OVERHEAD TYPICAL IS | | | INCORRECT AND MUST MATCH THE VERTICAL DETAIL. PLANTING | | | AREAS AROUND STREET TREES MAY BE EXPANDED AS LONG AS | | | THE 8 FOOT SIDEWALK WIDTH IS MAINTAINED. THIS WILL | | | MINIMIZE THE AREAS OF STRUCTURAL SOIL REQUIRED UNDER | | | THE ADJACENT PAVED AREA. PROVIDING A SEPARATE EXHIBIT | | | CLEARLY SHOWING THE LOCATIONS OF THE PLANTING AREAS AND | | | STRUCTURAL SOIL IS REQUIRED FOR STAFF TO VERIFY | | | ADEQUATE PLACEMENT, AND IS HELPFUL LATER IN | | | CONSTRUCTION FOR BIDDING AND INSTALLATION PURPOSES. | | | | | | 10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION | | | 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF | | | PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF DROUGHT TOLERANT AND | | | NATIVE SPECIES ADDED BASED ON THE PROPOSED PLANT LIST. | | | MUST INCLUDE ADDED PLANT MATERIAL NOT JUST REQUIRED. | | | RECALCULATE AFTER ADJUSTMENTS FROM OTHER COMMENTS. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 9/6/19: | | | | | | 11. NOT SATISFIED. ARTIFICIAL TURF DOG WALKING AREA | | | CANNOT BE VIEWABLE FROM THE ROAD OR STREET PER SECTION | | | 94-451, SO MUST BE FENCED TO BLOCK VIEW. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENT 10/28/19: | | | 12. THE PLACEMENT OF THE DRAINAGE FIELD BENEATH THE | | | TREES IN THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE HAS TO BE ACCEPTABLE TO | | | THE STORMWATER ENGINEER FOR THE CITY. | | | | | | 13. THE SOUTHERN OAK TREE AT THE CORNER OF QUADRILLE | | | AND DATURA IS WITHIN THE FDOT SIGHTLINE. CONFIRM THAT | | | THIS WILL BE ALLOWED BY FDOT. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-09-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-09-2019 |
Time |
11:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-09-2019 |
Time |
11:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-09-09 11:41:13 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 401 DATURA RESIDENTIAL Z19050020 | | | SEPTEMBER 6, 2019 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN: | | | ? SATISFIED. THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN NEEDS TO MATCH | | | THE LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY AND USE THE SAME | | | REFERENCE NUMBERS. | | | ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. TREE SPECIES ARE MISIDENTIFIED | | | ON THE LIST. CORRECT THE SPECIES. | | | TREE #24 IS A WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTA | | | ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. TREES AND PALMS CANOPY SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE TO BE MITIGATED BASED ON CATEGORY. ANY TREES 20 | | | FEET OR MORE CANOPY DIAMETER TO BE MITIGATED BY ACTUAL | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE. | | | ONLY TREE #1 IS 20 FEET OR MORE CANOPY DIAMETER. | | | MITIGATION IS 380 SQ FT. | | | #22 AND 23 ARE DOUBLE WASHINGTONIA PALMS. CATEGORY 4 | | | ARE 50 SQ FT EACH, SO EACH DOUBLE IS 100 SQ FT CANOPY | | | REMOVED. | | | ALL OAKS AND 2 REMAINING BLACK OLIVE TREES ARE CATEGORY | | | 1 TREES AT 300 SQ FT EACH CANOPY REMOVED. | | | EAST PALATKA HOLLIES #2, 3, 5, AND 6 AND SILVER TRUMPET | | | #7 ARE CATEGORY 2 AND ARE EACH 150 SQ FT CANOPY | | | REMOVED. | | | | | | ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE | | | OF MITIGATION FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE | | | REMOVED. | | | CORRECT ALL MITIGATION VALUES FOR THE ABOVE COMMENTS | | | AND ADD TOTAL FOR MITIGATION DUE. | | | ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION VALUES BY | | | CATEGORY FOR THE PROPOSED TREES AND PALMS. | | | REMOVE NOTE FOR TREE MITIGATION CALCULATED AT | | | PERMITTING. MITIGATION IS BASED ON CATEGORY LIST | | | PROVIDED. LIST EACH SPECIES AND CATEGORY AND TOTAL | | | MITIGATION VALUE. | | | | | | 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE STREETSCAPE CAN BE IMPROVED | | | TO ACCOMPLISH THE INTENT OF THE CODE SECTION 94-113. | | | THE ROYAL PALMS MAY BE USED, BUT NOT AS COUNTING TOWARD | | | THE TREE REQUIREMENT AT THE MAXIMUM 30 FOOT SPACING. | | | ADD CANOPY TREES AS REQUIRED. | | | CALCULATE TREE REQUIREMENT ON S DIXIE (4) AND MEET | | | REQUIREMENTS WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY. OPEN SPACE TREE | | | CANOPY ADJACENT TO THIS AREA NEEDS TO BE DESIGNED TO | | | COMPLEMENT REQUIRED STREET TREE CANOPY COVERAGE. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. REQUIRED STREET TREES MUST MEET THE 20 | | | FOOT HEIGHT REQUIREMENT AT INSTALLATION. LIST OVERALL | | | HEIGHT ON PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES | | | NATIVE TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE | | | OR RELOCATED. SUBMIT THE REASON EXISTING LIVE OAK TREES | | | CANNOT BE RELOCATED OR USED IN THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE. | | | EAST PALATKA HOLLIES #2, 3, 5, AND 6 ARE NOT IN GOOD | | | CONDITION AND ARE TO BE REMOVED. | | | LIVE OAK TREES #4, #20 AND 21 MAY BE RELOCATED TO THE | | | WEST SIDE OF QUADRILLE ROW TO REPLACE MISSING LIVE OAK | | | TREES. | | | | | | 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE | | | AREAS SHOWN ON SHEET MUST BE BROKEN DOWN TO SHOW THE | | | REQUIRED VEGETATED AREA AND ANY TREE CANOPY REQUIREMENT | | | FOR EACH AREA AS THE ALLOWED OPEN SPACE TYPE. TERRACE | | | REQUIRES 20% MINIMUM VEGETATED AREA. ROOFTOP GARDEN | | | REQUIRES 30% VEGETATED AREA AND 20% TREE CANOPY. TREE | | | CANOPY VALUES CAN BE FOUND IN SECTION 94-109 TABLE | | | IV-8. | | | AREAS ON THE GROUND LEVEL ARE NOT NAMED FOR OPEN SPACE | | | TYPE, AND REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT PROVIDED. TREE CANOPY | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE CREDITS ARE TO MATCH TABLE IV-8 FOR OPEN | | | SPACE. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. AREA LISTED AS POOL DECK ON LEVEL 5 IS | | | NOT AN OPEN SPACE TYPE. CLASSIFY AS A PERMITTED PRIVATE | | | OPEN SPACE TYPE (ROOFTOP GARDEN?) AND SHOW | | | REQUIREMENTS. | | | 7. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES ON | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN, ALSO LOCATIONS OF VALVES AND BACKFLOW | | | PREVENTERS AND FPL TRANSFORMERS. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS | | | REQUIRED TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES. | | | | | | 9. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF REQUIRED | | | STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE ADJACENT TO TREES. | | | PROVIDE A TYPICAL FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STRUCTURAL SOIL. | | | VERTICAL DETAIL IS CORRECT, OVERHEAD TYPICAL IS | | | INCORRECT AND MUST MATCH THE VERTICAL DETAIL. PLANTING | | | AREAS AROUND STREET TREES MAY BE EXPANDED AS LONG AS | | | THE 8 FOOT SIDEWALK WIDTH IS MAINTAINED. THIS WILL | | | MINIMIZE THE AREAS OF STRUCTURAL SOIL REQUIRED UNDER | | | THE ADJACENT PAVED AREA. PROVIDING A SEPARATE EXHIBIT | | | CLEARLY SHOWING THE LOCATIONS OF THE PLANTING AREAS AND | | | STRUCTURAL SOIL IS REQUIRED FOR STAFF TO VERIFY | | | ADEQUATE PLACEMENT, AND IS HELPFUL LATER IN | | | CONSTRUCTION FOR BIDDING AND INSTALLATION PURPOSES. | | | | | | 10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION | | | 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF | | | PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF DROUGHT TOLERANT AND | | | NATIVE SPECIES ADDED BASED ON THE PROPOSED PLANT LIST. | | | MUST INCLUDE ADDED PLANT MATERIAL NOT JUST REQUIRED. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 9/6/19: | | | | | | 11. ARTIFICIAL TURF DOG WALKING AREA CANNOT BE VIEWABLE | | | FROM THE ROAD OR STREET PER SECTION 94-451, SO MUST BE | | | FENCED TO BLOCK VIEW. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-10-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
06-10-2019 |
Time |
15:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
06-10-2019 |
Time |
15:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-06-10 15:43:08 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 401 DATURA RESIDENTIAL Z19050020 | | | JUNE 10, 2019 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION PLAN: | | | ? THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN NEEDS TO MATCH THE | | | LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY AND USE THE SAME | | | REFERENCE NUMBERS. | | | ? TREE SPECIES ARE MISIDENTIFIED ON THE LIST. CORRECT | | | THE SPECIES. | | | ? TREES AND PALMS CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE TO BE MITIGATED | | | BASED ON CATEGORY. ANY TREES 20 FEET OR MORE CANOPY | | | DIAMETER TO BE MITIGATED BY ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE. | | | ? PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF MITIGATION FOR | | | ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED. | | | ? PROVIDE THE MITIGATION VALUES BY CATEGORY FOR THE | | | PROPOSED TREES AND PALMS. | | | | | | 2. THE STREETSCAPE CAN BE IMPROVED TO ACCOMPLISH THE | | | INTENT OF THE CODE SECTION 94-113. THE ROYAL PALMS MAY | | | BE USED, BUT NOT AS COUNTING TOWARD THE TREE | | | REQUIREMENT AT THE MAXIMUM 30 FOOT SPACING. ADD CANOPY | | | TREES AS REQUIRED. | | | 3. REQUIRED STREET TREES MUST MEET THE 20 FOOT HEIGHT | | | REQUIREMENT AT INSTALLATION. LIST OVERALL HEIGHT ON | | | PLANT LIST. | | | | | | 4. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES IN GOOD | | | CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. SUBMIT | | | THE REASON EXISTING LIVE OAK TREES CANNOT BE RELOCATED | | | OR USED IN THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE. | | | | | | 5. PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS SHOWN ON SHEET | | | MUST BE BROKEN DOWN TO SHOW THE REQUIRED VEGETATED AREA | | | AND ANY TREE CANOPY REQUIREMENT FOR EACH AREA AS THE | | | ALLOWED OPEN SPACE TYPE. TERRACE REQUIRES 20% MINIMUM | | | VEGETATED AREA. ROOFTOP GARDEN REQUIRES 30% VEGETATED | | | AREA AND 20% TREE CANOPY. TREE CANOPY VALUES CAN BE | | | FOUND IN SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-8. | | | | | | 6. AREA LISTED AS POOL DECK ON LEVEL 5 IS NOT AN OPEN | | | SPACE TYPE. CLASSIFY AS A PERMITTED PRIVATE OPEN SPACE | | | TYPE (ROOFTOP GARDEN?) AND SHOW REQUIREMENTS. | | | 7. SHOW LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, | | | ALSO LOCATIONS OF VALVES AND BACKFLOW PREVENTERS AND | | | FPL TRANSFORMERS. | | | | | | 8. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS REQUIRED TO | | | PROTECT UTILITY LINES. | | | | | | 9. SHOW LOCATIONS OF REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL UNDER | | | HARDSCAPE ADJACENT TO TREES. PROVIDE A TYPICAL FOR THE | | | INSTALLATION OF THE STRUCTURAL SOIL. | | | | | | 10. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT | | | SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL | | | ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT | | | SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF | | | SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA | | | WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA | | | LANDSCAPES. | | | PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF DROUGHT TOLERANT AND | | | NATIVE SPECIES ADDED BASED ON THE PROPOSED PLANT LIST. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A | | | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-26-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
02-26-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
02-04-2020 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-26 14:23:47 | APPROVED WITH THE CONDITIONS BELOW, WHICH HAVE TO BE | | | MET FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT: | | | 1 - THE CITY TRASH ROOM SPECIFICATIONS: | | | FLOOR SHALL BE 6-INCH THICK CONCRETE. | | | ROLL-UP DOOR(S) SHALL HAVE MIN. 10 FT. HEIGHT AND | | | WIDTH. | | | THE ROOM SHALL HAVE A DEDICATED ELECTRICAL DISCONNECT. | | | THE ROOM SHALL BE CLIMATE CONTROLLED. | | | 2 - PRIVATE HAULER REVIEW AND INPUT OF THE PROPOSED | | | AUTO TURN TO SERVICE THE 30CY SELF-CONTAINED COMPACTOR. | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-06-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
11-06-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
11-06-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-11-06 08:50:40 | PLEASE MAKE SURE THE COMPACTOR IS: | | | - A FRONT LOADER CONTAINER TYPE TO BE SERVICED BY A | | | FRONT LOADER TRUCK WITH THE SIDE POCKETS STANDARD WIDTH | | | - HAS WHEELS TO BE ROLLED OUT FOR EASE OF SERVICE. | | | - ENCLOSED IN AN ENCLOSURE, IF STORED OUTSIDE, AND THE | | | ENCLOSURE COMPLIES WITH THE LATEST REVISION OF CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH GENERAL CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE | | | STANDARD, CG-8. | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-25-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
09-25-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
09-25-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-09-25 13:33:04 | PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS: | | | - TRASH ROOM SPECIFICATION AND DIMENSIONS FOR THE | | | COMPACTORS | | | - UPDATED AUTO TURN FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE, | | | INDICATING THE TRUCK WIDTH OF 11 FT. (SHEET C-12) | | | - CONTINGENCY PLAN, FOR WHEN THE COMPACTOR IS OUT OF | | | SERVICE (I.E. CITY DUMPSTER, ROLL-OFF CONTAINER) | | | - DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP AND | | | RRECYCLE RECEPTACLE CONTAINERS. | | | | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-04-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
06-11-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
06-11-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-06-11 09:52:27 | PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWINGS: | | | - LOS (LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS) TO REFLECT THE SOLID | | | WASTE VOLUME PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE SIZE OF THE | | | COMPACTOR THAT WILL BE UTILIZED. | | | - ENCLOSURE SPEC PER LATEST REVISION OF CITY OF WEST | | | PALM BEACH GENERAL CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE | | | STANDARD, CG-8, LATEST REVISION. | | | - AUTO TURN FOR THE SANITATION SERVICE | | | - CONTINGENCY PLAN, FOR WHEN THE COMPACTOR IS OUT OF | | | SERVICE (I.E. CITY DUMPSTER, ROLL-OFF CONTAINER) | | | - DESIGNATED LOCATION FOR THE BULK ITEM PICK UP AND | | | RRECYCLE RECEPTACLE CONTAINERS. | | | | | | | | | MATT HEJAZI | | | DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2045 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-27-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
02-27-2020 |
Time |
09:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
02-27-2020 |
Time |
09:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-27 09:20:13 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | ENGINEERING PLAN SUBMITTAL RECEIVED 2/25/2020. THEY | | | SHOULD NOT AFFECT THE SITE FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL BUT | | | WILL AFFECT THE ENGINEER PERMIT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. PARTS OF THE ALLEY WILL NEED TO BE RECONSTRUCTED AS | | | INVERTED CROWN WITH THE APPROPRIATE PAVEMENT SECTION | | | RATHER THAN MILLED AND RESURFACED. SOME OF THE PROPOSED | | | SPOT GRADES ARE NEARLY 2 INCHES LOWER THAN THE EXISTING | | | ASPHALT GRADE. VALLEY GUTTER MAY BE NEEDED DOWN THE | | | CENTER OF THE ALLEY TO FACILITATE DRAINAGE. | | | | | | 2. ADDITIONAL SURVEY SPOT GRADES SHOULD BE OBTAINED | | | ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE ALLEY TO | | | CONFIRM THE PROPOSED PROFILE OF THE ALLEY WILL NOT | | | AFFECT THE DRAINAGE OF THE PROPERTIES ON THE NORTH SIDE | | | OF THE ALLEY. THE PLANS INDICATE THERE ARE DOORWAYS | | | OPENING NEXT TO THE ALLEY WITH NOTES TO THE CONTRACTOR | | | TO NOT GRADE ABOVE THE DOORWAY. THERE IS ALSO A | | | PROPOSED SPOT GRADE OF 15.00 ON THE NORTH R/W SOUTH OF | | | AN EXISTING SPOT GRADE OF 14.89. | | | | | | 3. OBTAIN THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION FROM THE | | | ARCHITECT FOR THE SECTION OF THE BUILDING ALONG | | | QUADRILLE BLVD. SHOW THIS ELEVATION ON SECTION D-D. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-18-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
02-18-2020 |
Time |
16:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
02-19-2020 |
Time |
09:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-19 09:04:00 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | 1/28/2020 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE: | | | | | | 1. [REPEAT COMMENT] REVIEW THE PROPOSED GRADING OF THE | | | ALLEY. IT APPEARS WATER WILL BE PREVENTED FROM DRAINING | | | FROM THE PROPERTIES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE ALLEY. | | | THERE IS AN EXISTING OFFSITE SPOT GRADE OF 14.10 (NEAR | | | THE CROSS SECTION C-C CALLOUT). THE PROPOSED FLOW LINE | | | OF THE ALLEY ADJACENT TO THE SPOT GRADE IS BETWEEN | | | 14.15 AND 14.85. THERE IS AN EXISTING SPOT GRADE OF | | | 14.05 (FURTHER TO THE EAST) AND THE PROPOSED FLOW LINE | | | OF THE ALLEY IS 14.00. THE NORTH SIDE OF THE ALLEY WILL | | | HAVE A VERY FLAT CROSS SLOPE AND STORMWATER RUNOFF WILL | | | POOL IN THIS LOCATION, INCLUDING IN THE ADJACENT | | | OFFSITE AREA. | | | | | | 2. VERIFY THE PROPOSED FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION OF | | | 15.05 FEET NAVD PROVIDED ON CROSS SECTION D-D FOR THE | | | WEST PROPERTY LINE. THERE IS A PROPOSED SPOT GRADE OF | | | 17.65 ALONG THE WEST SDIE OF THE BUILDING. | | | | | | 3. THE CONCRETE SIDEWALK ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE | | | BUILDING SHALL BE CONTINUED ACROSS THE ALLEY. SHEET | | | C-05 SHOWS THE SIDEWALK AREA AS MILL AND RESURFACE. | | | | | | 4. ADD MORE PRB'S UPSTREAM OF THE EXFILTRATION TRENCHES | | | TO EXTEND THEIR LIFE. | | | | | | 5. DIMENSION THE LOW SPOT OF THE ALLEY IN SECTION C-C | | | ON SHEET C-07. STAFF IS UNCLEAR IF THE NOTE ?LOW SPOT | | | IS CENTER OF ALLEY? REFERS TO THE CENTER OF THE | | | PROPOSED 20? ALLEY OR THE CENTER OF THE ALLEY R/W. | | | | | | 6. IN SECTION C-C ON SHEET C-07 PROVIDE A DIMENSION FOR | | | THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE ALLEY R/W LINE AND THE SOUTH | | | EDGE OF PAVEMENT. | | | | | | 7. ALTHOUGH DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WERE NOT PROVIDED | | | WITH THIS SUBMITTAL, THEY WERE SUBMITTED WITH THE | | | ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION PACKAGE. THE | | | EXFILTRATION CALCULATIONS DID NOT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE | | | FLOW RESTRICTIONS OF THE ADJACENT TRENCHES ON EACH | | | OTHER. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-12-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
12-12-2019 |
Time |
11:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
12-12-2019 |
Time |
11:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-12-12 11:47:15 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | DECEMBER 5, 2019 REVIEW SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. NO WRITTEN | | | RESPONSES WERE PROVIDED TO THE OCTOBER 2019 COMMENTS. | | | | | | 1. SHEET C-07 CONTAINING THE CROSS SECTIONS IS NOT | | | INCLUDED IN THE PACKAGE. [REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING CATCH BASIN | | | IN THE ALLEY AND IF IT CAN BE MODIFIED TO ACCEPT THE | | | NEW DRINAGE PIPE. [REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 3. IT APPEARS THE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE ALLEY WILL TRAP | | | STORMWATER RUNOFF NORTH OF THE ALLEY. VERIFY THE MILL | | | AND OVERLAY OF THE ALLEY WILL NOT AFFECT THE EXISTING | | | SURFACE DRAINAGE OF THE OFFSITE AREAS. [REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 4. THE ONSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM IS SHOWN TO BE | | | EXILTRATION TRENCHES SIDE BY SIDE SIMILAR TO A DRAIN | | | FIELD AND WITH TREES PLANTED OVER THE EXFILTRATION | | | TRENCHES. THE FLOW OUT OF THE SIDES OF THE TRENCHES | | | WILL BE AFFECTED BY THE ADJACENT TRENCHES. PROVIDE A | | | DIFFERENT LAYOUT PATTERN OR CONSIDER A DIFFERENT TYPE | | | OF STORAGE SYSTEM SUCH AS SUSPENDED PAVEMENT, | | | STORMTRAP, CON/SPAN, ETC. [REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 5. IT APPEARS DRAINAGE STRUCTURE NO. 12 WILL BE A NEW | | | STRUCTURE AND NEW STORM PIPE CROSSING DATURA ST. TO THE | | | EXISTING CATCH BASIN ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF DATURA ST. IS | | | STRUCTURE NO. 12 ADDED STRICTLY FOR CONNECTING THE | | | OUTFALL PIPE FROM THE ONSITE EXFILTRATION SYSTEM? IS IT | | | POSSIBLE TO CONNECT THE ONSITE SYSTEM TO THE EXISTING | | | CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET) FURTHER TO THE EAST AT THE NW | | | CORNER OF DATURA ST AND S. DIXIE HWY? [REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 6. LABEL THE STREETS ON SHEET C-05. [REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 7. LABEL THE EXISTING STORM PIPE SIZES AND PIPE | | | MATERIAL. [REPEAT COMMENT] | | | | | | 8. IT APPEARS SOME OF THE EXISTING ELEVATION DATA ON | | | SHEET C-05 ARE IN REFERENCE TO NGVD1929 WHEREAS THERE | | | IS A NOTE STATING ALL ELEVATION DATA ARE NAVD1988. BY | | | WAY OF EXAMPLES, ALL OF THE LISTED GRATE ELEVATIONS FOR | | | THE EXISTING CATCH BASINS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF DATURA | | | STREET ARE AT LEAST ONE FOOT HIGHER THAN THE GRATE | | | ELEVATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURES ON THE | | | NORTH SIDE OF THE STREET. THE SOUTH INVERT ELEVATION | | | FOR STRUCTURE NO. 12 IS LOWER THAN THE NORTH INVERT | | | ELEVATION OF THE STRUCTURE THE DRAINAGE PIPE IS | | | CONNECTING TO. | | | | | | 9. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE FOR YARD DRAINS NOS. 15 AND 16? | | | | | | 10. CONFIRM ALL OF THE ROOF DRAINS WILL DRAIN TO THE | | | ONSITE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE | | | OF THE PROJECT. | | | | | | 11. IT APPEARS YARD DRAIN NO. 9 WILL BE LOCATED IN THE | | | STEPS TO THE PUBLIC PLAZA. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-30-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
10-30-2019 |
Time |
16:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
10-30-2019 |
Time |
17:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-10-30 17:20:16 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | OCTOBER 11, 2019 REVIEW SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. | | | | | | 1. SHEET C-07 CONTAINING THE CROSS SECTIONS IS NOT | | | INCLUDED IN THE PACKAGE. | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING CATCH BASIN | | | IN THE ALLEY AND IF IT CAN BE MODIFIED TO ACCEPT THE | | | NEW DRINAGE PIPE. | | | | | | 3. IT APPEARS THE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE ALLEY WILL TRAP | | | STORMWATER RUNOFF NORTH OF THE ALLEY. VERIFY THE MILL | | | AND OVERLAY OF THE ALLEY WILL NOT AFFECT THE EXISTING | | | SURFACE DRAINAGE OF THE OFFSITE AREAS. | | | | | | 4. THE ONSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM IS SHOWN TO BE | | | EXILTRATION TRENCHES SIDE BY SIDE SIMILAR TO A DRAIN | | | FIELD AND WITH TREES PLANTED OVER THE EXFILTRATION | | | TRENCHES. THE FLOW OUT OF THE SIDES OF THE TRENCHES | | | WILL BE AFFECTED BY THE ADJACENT TRENCHES. PROVIDE A | | | DIFFERENT LAYOUT PATTERN OR CONSIDER A DIFFERENT TYPE | | | OF STORAGE SYSTEM SUCH AS SUSPENDED PAVEMENT, | | | STORMTRAP, CON/SPAN, ETC. | | | | | | 5. IT APPEARS DRAINAGE STRUCTURE NO. 12 WILL BE A NEW | | | STRUCTURE AND NEW STORM PIPE CROSSING DATURA ST. TO THE | | | EXISTING CATCH BASIN ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF DATURA ST. IS | | | STRUCTURE NO. 12 ADDED STRICTLY FOR CONNECTING THE | | | OUTFALL PIPE FROM THE ONSITE EXFILTRATION SYSTEM? IS IT | | | POSSIBLE TO CONNECT THE ONSITE SYSTEM TO THE EXISTING | | | CATCH BASIN FURTHER TO THE EAST AT THE NW CORNER OF | | | DATURA ST AND S. DIXIE HWY? | | | | | | 6. LABEL THE STREETS ON SHEET C-05. | | | | | | 7. LABEL THE EXISTING STORM PIPE SIZES AND PIPE | | | MATERIAL. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-29-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
08-29-2019 |
Time |
10:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
08-29-2019 |
Time |
11:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-08-29 11:01:16 | THE FOLLOWNIG COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | AUGUST 20, 2019 ROUTED SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. | | | | | | 1. REVIEW THE ELEVATION INFORMATION FOR THE EXISTING | | | DRAINAGE STRUCTURES ON SHEET C-05. IT MAY BE LISTING | | | THE INFORMATION IN RELATION TO NGVD 1929. THE NOTE ON | | | THE PLAN INDICATES NAVD 1988 IS THE VERTICAL DATUM. | | | | | | 2. REVIEW GRATE ELEVATION FOR STRUCTURE NO. 11. IT IS | | | THE SAME ELEVATION AS THE GRATE ELEVATION FOR STRUCTURE | | | NO. 12 AND ALSO CREATES A 6% GUTTER SLOPE TO THE SPOT | | | GRADE OF 14.55 TO THE WEST. ALSO REVIEW THE INVERT | | | DIRECTIONS LISTED FOR STRUCTURE NO. 11. | | | | | | 3. ADVERSE SLOPE FOR THE PIPE BETWEEN STRUCTURES NO. 11 | | | AND NO. 12. | | | | | | 4. TWO TYPES OF MATERIAL (DIP AND RCP) INDICATED FOR | | | THE PIPE SOUTH OUT OF STRUCTURE NO. 10. | | | | | | 5. STORM PIPE CROSSING DATURA STREET TO THE EAST OF | | | STRUCTURE NO. 9 WILL NEED TO BE REMOVED OR ABANDONED IN | | | PLACE DEPENDING ON THE PIPE SIZE. | | | | | | 6. SHOW MILLING AND RESURFACING LIMITS FOR THE TRENCH | | | CUTS IN THE RIGHT OF WAY. | | | | | | 7. ON THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH DETAIL ON SHEET C-06, ALL | | | OF THE ELEVATIONS SHOULD BE IN REFERENCE TO NAVD1988. | | | ALSO SHOW THE CONVERSION BETWEEN NAVD1988 AND NGVD1929 | | | ON THE SHEET. | | | | | | 8. REVIEW THE FFE LISTED ON SHEET C-05 AND LISTED FOR | | | THE CROSS SECTIONS SHOWN ON SHEET C-07. | | | | | | 9. SHOW DIRECTIONAL FLOW ARROWS ON THE CROSS SECTIONS | | | ON SHEET C-07. | | | | | | 10. FOR SECTION A-A ON SHEET C-07, IS TYPE 'F' CURB AND | | | GUTTER NEEDED IF THE PARKING STALL SLOPES TO THE VALLEY | | | GUTTER? DOES THE WIDTH OF THE PARKING STALL INCLUDE THE | | | 2-FOOT VALLEY GUTTER. | | | | | | 11. FOR SECTION C-C ON SHEET C-07, SHOW THE DISTANCE | | | FROM THE PROPERTY LINE TO THE FACE OF CURB. PROVIDE | | | CROSS SLOPE INFORMATION. | | | | | | 12. RCP PIPE TO BE USED FOR STORMWATER WITHIN THE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY (NORTH PIPE AT STRUCTURE NO. 1). | | | | | | TRACY WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-10-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
06-10-2019 |
Time |
18:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
06-10-2019 |
Time |
18:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-06-10 18:32:52 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | | | APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR | | | MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. THE CITY?S VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD 1929. THE CITY HAS | | | ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD 1988 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION | | | EQUATION TO NGVD 1929 IS PROVIDED ON THE SHEET(S). | | | LABEL THE VERTICAL DATUM ON THE ENGINEERING SHEETS | | | CONTAINING ELEVATION INFORMATION AND PROVIDE THE | | | CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929. | | | | | | 2. REVIEW THE GRATE ELEVATION OF 15.22 FT NAVD FOR | | | STRUCTURE #11. IT IS SITUATED BETWEEN SPOT GRADES OF | | | 14.60 AND 14.40 FOR THE VALLEY GUTTER. | | | | | | 3. EXISTING CATCH BASIN TO THE EAST OF THE VALLEY | | | GUTTER SPOT GRADE 14.40 HAS A GRATE ELEVATION OF 14.85. | | | | | | 4. PROPOSED PIPE BETWEEN PROPOSED YARD DRAIN #4 AND | | | EXISTING CATCH BASIN WILL HAVE AN ADVERSE SLOPE. SOUTH | | | INVERT ELEVATION AT YARD DRAIN IS 9.50. BOTTOM | | | ELEVATION OF EXISTING CATCH BASIN IS 10.80. | | | | | | 5. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FOR THE PARKING AREA AND DROP | | | AREA | | | | | | 6. PROVIDE CROSS SECTION AND PAVEMENT DESIGN FOR THE | | | ALLEY. | | | | | | 7. REVISE YARD DRAIN #5 TO HAVE THE PRB ON THE EAST | | | INVERT. | | | | | | 8. WHICH STRUCTURE WILL CONTAIN A WEIR TO SURCHARGE THE | | | EXFILTRATION TRENCHES. | | | | | | 9. S. QUADRILLE BLVD. IS MAINTAINED BY FDOT. FDOT | | | PERMITS WILL BE NEEDED FOR WORK WITHIN THE QUADILLE | | | BLVD. RIGHT OF WAY. | | | | | | 10. SIDEWALKS SHOULD BE GRADED TO DIRECT RUNOFF TO THE | | | ONSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. | | | | | | 11. PROVIDE CCTV VIDEOS OF THE THREE DRAINAGE PIPES ON | | | DATURA STREET CONNECTED TO PROPOSED STRUCTURES #4, #10 | | | AND #11. | | | | | | 12. SIDEWALK EASEMENT WILL BE NEEDED ADJACENT TO THE | | | DROP OFF AREA. | | | | | | 13. PORTE-COCHERE ENCROACHES INTO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | | | | 14. HARDSCAPE FEATURES LOCATED WITH THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | | | | 15. TREES PROPOSED OVER AND ADJACENT TO THE | | | EXFILTRATION SYSTEM. | | | | | | 16. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD | | | CRITERIA FOR WATER QUALITY TREATMENT AND PEAK FLOW | | | ATTENUATION. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION MAY | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE | | | ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 2. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED | | | WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD ERP PRIOR TO STARTING | | | CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-26-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
02-26-2020 |
Time |
14:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-26 14:05:50 | 1. PASSED. REMAINING COMMENTS WILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED | | | IN ENGINEERING PERMIT REVIEW. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-12-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
02-12-2020 |
Time |
08:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-12 08:25:49 | 1. PREVIOUS COMMENTS NOT ADDRESSED. | | | 2. AN ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL WAS MADE PRIOR TO SITE PLAN | | | APPROVAL. SEE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY W/ | | | CUSTOMER SERVICE, TRACY WARD AND RICK ROSSANO. PLEASE | | | ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING AT NEXT SUBMITTAL. | | | THESE WERE SENT TO THOMAS ENG. ON 2/6. | | | 3. FOR PLANNING - WHAT IS THE ALLOWABLE CANOPY | | | ENCROACHMENT IN DATURA? HOW IS THIS CANOPY TO BE | | | SUPPORTED? | | | | | | | | | | | | .FROM: RICK ROSSANO | | | SENT: THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 06, 2020 1:28 PM | | | TO: DANIELA MARTINAT ; JASON | | | GUNTHER | | | CC: MARK HURLEY ; MANUEL GONZALEZ | | | ; TRACY WARD | | | SUBJECT: COMMENTS FOR ENGINEERING PERMIT E20010032 - | | | 401 DATURA STREET, SENIOR APARTMENTS | | | | | | PLEASE FIND ENCLOSED COMMENTS FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT | | | FOR YOUR USE: | | | | | | COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR, | | | WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-822-2262, [email protected] | | | | | | -FIRE HYDRANT NEAR SE INTERSECTION SAYS ?RELOCATED?, | | | BUT NOT KNOWN WHERE IT IS RELOCATED FROM. WHY DOES FIRE | | | HYDRANT NEED TO BE RELOCATED INSTEAD OF EXTRA ONE | | | ADDED? | | | | | | -EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT MISSING FROM SW INTERSECTION | | | LARGE PLAN. | | | | | | -4 IN. DOMESTIC METER NEEDS TO BE ABOVE-GROUND | | | INSTALLED USING SD WS-8 INSTEAD OF UNDERGROUND VAULT | | | INSTALLED. | | | | | | -NEED TO HAVE ARROW POINTING FROM "4 IN. LEAD FREE RPZ" | | | TO THE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY ICON ON THE PLAN. ALSO ADD "WS | | | 7". | | | | | | -PLAN NOT SHOWING THE NEW WATER SERVICES ON DATURA | | | WATER MAIN THAT FEED 499 EVERNIA ST. | | | | | | -SEE SOME NOTES THAT SAY "CAP WATER SERVICE AT MAIN". | | | IF THOSE ARE WATER SERVICES WITH AN ASSOCIATED METER | | | BOX NEED SHOW ON PLAN WHERE BOX IS AND ADD NOTE TO HAVE | | | BOX REMOVED. NEED ALSO PUT WHAT HAPPENING TO OLD | | | SERVICE LINE (REMOVED?) | | | -NEED ARROW POINTING FROM 1 1/2 INCH RPZ TO THE ICON ON | | | PLAN. ADD "WS 11" | | | | | | -SERVICE PIPING FOR 1 1/2 WATER SERVICE NOT LABELED | | | WITH SIZE AND PIPE MATERIAL. ADD "WS 1" TO METER LABEL. | | | | | | -SERVICE PIPING AFTER 12 IN. X 4 IN. TAP NOT LABELED | | | WITH SIZE AND PIPE MATERIAL. 4 IN. TAP WILL BE FEEDING | | | 4 IN. METER AND 1.5 IN. METER -> IS THAT TAP SIZE | | | SUFFICIENT? | | | | | | -THE NEW WATER SERVICES HAVE PIPING THAT IS CROSSING | | | EACH OTHER IN MULTIPLE LOCATIONS. CAN THE PIPING BE | | | ADJUSTED SO THAT CROSSINGS ARE ELIMINATED? | | | | | | -RECOMMEND PARALLEL BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ON DOMESTIC | | | WATER SERVICE TO ELIMINATE OUTAGES FOR CUSTOMER DURING | | | BACKFLOW MAINTENANCE. | | | | | | -CAN POINT OF SERVICE GV FOR THE 6 IN. FIRE LINE BE | | | RELOCATED SLIGHTLY NORTH INTO UE TO BE OUT OF FOOT | | | TRAFFIC? | | | | | | -AFTER 4 IN. TAP THERE ARE TWO ICONS FOR GV?S. IS THAT | | | CORRECT? | | | | | | -DO NOT SEE IRRIGATION USE IN THE DEMAND CHART. DOES IT | | | NEED TO BE INCLUDED IN THE CHART? | | | | | | -LOOKS TO BE A LIGHT POLE TOO CLOSE TO FIRELINE WATER | | | SERVICE. SHOULD BE 5 FEET AWAY FROM EACH OTHER. | | | | | | -POINT OF SERVICES LABEL INCORRECT ON DETAIL A. | | | | | | -ON THE NW AREA OF PLAN THERE ARE TWO SETS OF DOORS | | | THAT OPEN OUTWARD INTO THE ROADWAY. DID NOT KNOW IF | | | THAT IS SAFE? | | | | | | -IT IS VERY HARD TO SEE THE BOUNDARIES OF THE NEW | | | UTILITY EASEMENT -> NEED TO MAKE CLEARER. | | | | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE PER TRACY L. WARD, P.E., | | | CITY OF WPB SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER: | | | | | | 1. THE PROPOSED GRADING OF THE ALLEY WILL TRAP WATER ON | | | THE PROPERTY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE ALLEY. | | | 2. THE SIDEWALK AT THE WEST END OF THE ALLEY SHOULD BE | | | CONSTRUCTED OF CONCRETE INSTEAD OF BEING REPLACED WITH | | | ASPHALT. | | | 3. ADD MORE PRB?S IN THE DRAINAGE STRUCTURES UPSTREAM | | | OF THE EXFILTRATION TRENCHES TO EXTEND THE LIFE OF THE | | | TRENCHES. | | | 4. THE EXFILTRATION EQUATION USED IN THE DRAINAGE | | | CALCULATIONS IS NOT APPROPRIATE FOR THE LAYOUT OF THE | | | TRENCHES. THE TRENCHES ARE ONLY SEPARATED BY 3 FEET AND | | | EACH TRENCH WILL AFFECT THE FLOW RATE THROUGH THE SIDE | | | OF THE ADJACENT TRENCH. | | | 5. PROPOSED SPOT GRADES OUTSIDE THE SOUTH AND WEST | | | SIDES OF THE BUILDING ARE HIGHER THAN THE PROPOSED | | | FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION. SECTIONS A-A AND D-D ON SHEET | | | C-07 DO NOT REFLECT THIS. THERE APPEAR TO BE DOOR | | | OPENINGS ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING. | | | 6. DIMENSION THE LOW SPOT OF THE ALLEY IN SECTION C-C | | | ON SHEET C-07. STAFF IS UNCLEAR IF THE NOTE LOW SPOT IS | | | CENTER OF ALLEY REFERS TO THE CENTER OF THE PROPOSED 20 | | | FT. ALLEY OR THE CENTER OF THE ALLEY R/W. | | | 7. IN SECTION C-C ON SHEET C-07 PROVIDE A DIMENSION FOR | | | THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE ALLEY R/W LINE AND THE SOUTH | | | EDGE OF PAVEMENT. | | | | | | WITH REGARDS, | | | TRACY L. WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS ST., 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | PHONE: 561-494-1120 | | | FAX: 561-494-1116 | | | CELL 561-351-0510 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE PER RICK ROSSANO, PROJ. | | | COORDINATOR, ENG. SERVICES: | | | | | | PLEASE CLEARLY LABEL 12 IN. WATER MAIN WITH PIPE SIZE & | | | MATERIAL. | | | | | | PLEASE ADD FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE PERVIOUS/IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS TO | | | DRAINAGE SHEET. | | | | | | PLEASE UPDATE STANDARD DETAIL GC-6. | | | | | | | | | THANKS, | | | | | | RICK ROSSANO | | | PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | WPB ENGINEERING SERVICES | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 | | | CELL: (561) 246-9525 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-10-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
12-10-2019 |
Time |
09:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-12-10 09:31:42 | 1. NO RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS SURVEY COMMENTS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-06-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
11-06-2019 |
Time |
07:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-11-06 07:25:15 | 1. REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | 2. NO RESPONSE TO SURVEY COMMENTS IN LAST SUBMITTAL. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-11-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
09-11-2019 |
Time |
07:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-09-11 07:41:44 | 1. REMOVE VAULT FROM SIDEWALK AREA. APPROVAL FROM MARK | | | HURLEY, CUSTOMER SERVICE, WILL BE REQUIRED FOR | | | METER/BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY. | | | 2. CANOPY MAY REQUIRE AN AERIAL ENCROACHMENT EASEMENT. | | | 3. A LANDSCAPE/HARDSCAPE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH | | | FDOT WILL BE REQUIRED. THE APPLICANT NEEDS TO PROCESS | | | APPLICATION WITH FDOT FOR THE CITY TO APPROVE. THE | | | OWNER WITH THEN ASSUME OBLIGATIONS OF THAT AGREEMENT | | | AND ANY OTHER RIGHT-OF-WAY MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS | | | THROUGH A SEPARATE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-07-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
06-07-2019 |
Time |
09:34 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-06-07 10:17:57 | 1. REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | 2. THERE ARE 2 EXISTING COMPACTORS AND 2 RECYCLING | | | DUMPSTERS THAT WE WOULD LIKE TO RETAIN ON-SITE. | | | 3. NOT SURE IF REGRADING THE ALLEY WILL BE POSSIBLE TO | | | FLOW TO EASTERN CATCH BASIN. | | | 4. NEED TO REVIEW LOCATION OF METER AND BACKFLOW IN SW | | | CORNER. WILL NEED TO SEE BLOW-UP TO SCALE WITH PROPOSED | | | IMPROVEMENTS AND LANDSCAPING. | | | 5. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR | | | IMPROVEMENTS/LANDSCAPING WITHIN RIGHT-OF-WAYS. | | | QUADRILLE WILL REQUIRE A LMOA WITH THE FDOT. | | | 6. EASEMENT MAY BE REQUIRED FOR WIDENED ALLEY. | | | 7. CANOPY WITHIN DATURA WILL NEED TO BE DISCUSSED. | | | 8. VERTICAL DATUM NEEDS TO BE ADDED TO ALL PLANS. | | | 9. APPROVAL FROM FPL WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ANY EASEMENT | | | ENCROACHMENT OR RELEASE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
01-16-2020 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-01-16 09:39:48 | PASSED WITH CONDITIONS: | | | 1. THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE REQUIRED TO COORDINATE WITH | | | CITY PARKING ADMINISTRATOR FOR PRIVATE COMMERCIAL USE | | | OF CURBSIDE PARKING SPACE PER CITY CODE 94-111(L). | | | | | | | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] | | | (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
10-23-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-10-23 10:53:05 | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | 1. THE BICYCLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED UNDER CITY CODE | | | 94-113(D)(9) SHOULD BE PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE. PLEASE | | | VERIFY IF THE 4 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES NEAR THE PUBLIC | | | PLAZA ARE OPEN FOR THE PUBLIC AS THEY APPEAR TO BE | | | LOCATED WITHIN THE OUTDOOR DINING AREA. | | | 2. IN SHEET C-11, THE STOP BAR AT THE ALLEY SHOULD BE | | | LOCATED AT LEAST 4 FEET IN ADVANCE OF THE | | | SIDEWALK/CROSSWALK. | | | 3. PROVIDE DETECTABLE WARNINGS ON THE SIDEWALK ACROSS | | | BOTH ALLEY ACCESS POINTS. | | | 4. THE PARALLEL PARKING SPACES ON DATURA STREET SHOULD | | | BE AT LEAST 20 FEET AWAY FROM THE CROSSWALK AND AT | | | LEAST 15 FEET AWAY FROM FIRE HYDRANT PER MUTCD AND | | | FLORIDA STATUTES, AND SHOULD BE CLEAR OF THE PROPOSED | | | FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION. THE FIRST PARKING SPACE ON | | | THE NORTH SIDE OF DATURA STREET EAST OF QUADRILLE | | | BOULEVARD IS CURRENTLY HATCHED OUT AND IS NOT BEING | | | USED FOR PARKING. | | | 5. PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL ON-STREET PARKING SPACE EAST | | | OF THE VALET AREA. | | | 6. RELOCATE THE FIRE HYDRANT NEAR DIXIE HIGHWAY OUT OF | | | THE SIDEWALK AREA. | | | 7. THE RESPONSE INDICATED THAT THE LANDSCAPE AREA ON | | | THE BUILDING SIDE HAS BEEN REDUCED TO ACCOMMODATE | | | LARGER SIDEWALK AS REQUESTED, BUT THE SIDEWALK WIDTH | | | REMAINS AT 10 FEET AND DID NOT CHANGE FROM THE PREVIOUS | | | SUBMITTAL. PLEASE PROVIDE 12-FOOT SIDEWALK ALONG | | | QUADRILLE BLVD. | | | 8. PAVEMENT MILL AND RESURFACE ON DATURA STREET AFTER | | | UTILITY TIE-IN SHOULD INCLUDE BOTH SIDES OF THE STREET. | | | 9. PLEASE CLARIFY IF THE LANDSCAPE ON QUADRILLE | | | BOULEVARD MEETS FDOT'S SIGHT DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | TRAFFIC STATEMENT COMMENTS: | | | 10. PLEASE VERIFY THE VEHICLE CIRCULATION ROUTE FOR | | | VALET ACCESS AS EASTBOUND VEHICLES ON DATURA STREET | | | WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO MAKE A U-TURN TO ACCESS THE VALET | | | AREA, NOR OUTBOUND VALET VEHICLES WOULD BE ABLE TO MAKE | | | A U-TURN TO HEAD EAST. | | | 11. PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ANALYSIS AT THE | | | FOLLOWING INTERSECTIONS: | | | A. QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/CLEMATIS STREET | | | B. QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/DATURA STREET | | | C. QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/FERN STREET | | | D. DIXIE HIGHWAY/CLEMATIS STREET | | | E. DIXIE HIGHWAY/DATURA STREET | | | 12. COMMITTED TRIPS FROM APPROVED DEVELOPMENTS SHOULD | | | BE INCLUDED IN THE ANALYSIS. | | | | | | | | | CONDITION: | | | 1. THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE REQUIRED TO COORDINATE WITH | | | CITY PARKING ADMINISTRATOR FOR PRIVATE COMMERCIAL USE | | | OF CURBSIDE PARKING SPACE PER CITY CODE 94-111(L). | | | | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] | | | (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS) | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
09-09-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-09-09 15:15:49 | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | 1. THE ON-STREET VALET DROP OFF/PICK UP AREA IS LOCATED | | | WITHIN THE PUBLIC ROW AND WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS PUBLIC | | | PARKING SPACES UNLESS ARRANGEMENT IS MADE WITH CITY | | | PARKING ADMINISTRATOR FOR EXCLUSIVE PRIVATE COMMERCIAL | | | USE PER CITY CODE 94-111(L). | | | 2. INCLUDE THE REQUIRED AND PROPOSED NUMBER OF BICYCLE | | | PARKING SPACES IN THE SITE DATA TABLE. BICYCLE | | | FACILITIES AND STORAGE SHOULD BE PROVIDED PER CITY CODE | | | 94-111(I) AND 94-113(D)(9). THE REQUIRED PUBLIC BICYCLE | | | PARKING SPACES SHOULD BE DISTRIBUTED RELATIVELY EVENLY | | | ALONG THE SITE FRONTAGE. | | | 3. PROVIDE AUTOTURN PATH TO SHOW THE PROVIDED | | | TURNAROUND AND BACK UP SPACE ON THE GARAGE LEVEL 3 IS | | | SUFFICIENT FOR A 3-POINT TURN. | | | 4. IN SHEET C-11, THE STOP BAR AT THE ALLEY SHOULD BE | | | LOCATED AT LEAST 4 FEET IN ADVANCE OF THE | | | SIDEWALK/CROSSWALK. | | | 5. CLARIFY THE SIGNAGE USED IN THE CIRCULAR LANDSCAPED | | | AREA BY THE GARAGE ENTRANCE. | | | 6. THE PARALLEL PARKING SPACES ON DATURA STREET SHOULD | | | BE AT LEAST 20 FEET AWAY FROM THE CROSSWALK PER MUTCD | | | AND FLORIDA STATUTES. | | | 7. CITY CODE 94-305(D) REQUIRES A 100-FOOT SETBACK FROM | | | CENTERLINE ON QUADRILLE BOULEVARD. | | | 8. CONSIDER REDUCING THE LANDSCAPE AREA ON THE BUILDING | | | SIDE TO PROVIDE 12-FOOT SIDEWALK ALONG QUADRILLE BLVD. | | | 9. SINCE THE DEVELOPMENT REQUESTS PARKING WAIVER PER | | | CITY CODE 94-481(F), RESTRICTIVE COVENANT THAT | | | RESTRICTS THE USE OF THE PROPERTY TO SERVING PERSONS | | | WHO ARE 55 YEARS OR OLDER OR PERSONS WHO ARE DISABLED | | | SHALL BE EXECUTED AND RECORDED PER CITY CODE | | | 94-481(F)(3). | | | | | | TRAFFIC STATEMENT COMMENTS: | | | 10. PROVIDE THE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | 11. PROVIDE TRIP DISTRIBUTION WITHIN THE RADIUS OF | | | INFLUENCE PER PALM BEACH COUNTY TPS. | | | 12. PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ANALYSIS AT THE | | | FOLLOWING INTERSECTIONS: | | | A. QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/CLEMATIS STREET | | | B. QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/DATURA STREET | | | C. QUADRILLE BOULEVARD/FERN STREET | | | D. DIXIE HIGHWAY/CLEMATIS STREET | | | E. DIXIE HIGHWAY/DATURA STREET | | | F. DIXIE HIGHWAY/FERN STREET | | | 13. COMMITTED TRIPS FROM APPROVED DEVELOPMENTS SHOULD | | | BE INCLUDED IN THE ANALYSIS. | | | | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] | | | (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
06-11-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-06-11 18:06:14 | 1. FOR A 2-WAY ACCESS ALLEY, THE WIDTH SHOULD BE 20 | | | FEET MINIMUM | | | 2. PROVIDE GARBAGE CIRCULATION | | | 3. PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING SPACES PER CITY CODE | | | 4. PROVIDE 12 FOOT SIDEWALK ALONG QUADRILLE BLVD. | | | 5. PROVIDE A TRAFFIC STUDY | | | 6. PROVIDE THE COUNTY TPS LETTER | | | 7. ONE OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE APPLICATION IS TO | | | MEET WITH THE TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT | | | BEFORE THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL. PLEASE SCHEDULE A | | | MEETING WITH THE TEAM. | | | 8. THERE IS A REQUIREMENT OF 100 PARKING SPACES THAT IS | | | MISSING ON THE SITE PLAN. | | | 9. PROVIDE AUTO TURN PATH FOR PASSENGER CARS AND | | | GARBAGE TRUCKS FOR WEST ACCESS TO THE GARAGE. | | | 10. VALET DROP OFF/PICK UP ON STREET NEED TO BE PAID TO | | | THE CITY. CITY CODE 94-111 (L) | | | 11. PROVIDE A QUEUING ANALYSIS FOR THE VALET DROP | | | OFF/PICK UP | | | 12. PROVIDE TURN AROUND AND BACK UP SPACE ON THE GARAGE | | | LEVEL 4 | | | | | | | | | LINA M. CAMACHO | | | SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1129 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-27-2020 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
elevesqu |
Date |
02-27-2020 |
Time |
11:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
elevesqu |
Date |
02-27-2020 |
Time |
11:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2020-02-27 11:08:57 | COMMENTS SHALL BE LABELED ?SATISFIED?, ?NOT SATISFIED?, | | | ?PARTIALLY SATISFIED?, OR ?ONGOING? | | | ANY NEW COMMENTS OR FURTHER EXPLANATION OF OLD COMMENTS | | | SHALL BE BOLDED. | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. | | | 2. SATISFIED. | | | 3. SATISFIED. | | | 4. CONDITION OF APPROVAL. PER SECTION 94-54(A)(3), | | | FORMAL SITE PLAN APPROVALS INVOLVING THE TDR PROGRAM | | | SHALL BE APPROVED BY DAC AND THE CERTIFICATE OF | | | TRANSFER SHALL BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF | | | THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL. | | | CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL SHALL BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO | | | EXPIRATION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL. | | | 5. SATISFIED. | | | 6. SATISFIED. | | | 7. SATISFIED. | | | 8. SATISFIED. | | | 9. CONIDITION OF APPROVAL. IF VALET IS PROPOSING | | | UTILIZING EXISTING OR PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING FOR | | | VALET, THE APPLICANT SHALL PAY FOR THE USE OF THOSE | | | OCCUPIED SPACES IN AMOUNT AS ESTABLISHED BY THE CITY | | | AND IN LOCATIONS APPROVED BY THE CITY PARKING | | | ADMINISTRATOR. THIS WOULD UTILIZE EXISTING ON-STREET | | | PARKING SPACES AND NOT INTERFERE WITH SIDEWALK | | | CONNECTIVITY. | | | APPLICANT TO WORK WITH PARKING ADMINISTRATION ON | | | PARKING SPACES. | | | 10. SATISFIED. | | | 11. SATISFIED. | | | 12. SATISFIED. | | | 13. CONDITION OF APPROVAL. PALM TRAN HAS PERMITTED THE | | | USE OF THE BROADSTONE BUS SHELTER, BUT IT WILL NEED A | | | BACK INSTALLED. THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE SOME | | | ARCHITECTURAL RENDERINGS OF PROPOSED BACKING TO BE | | | REVIEWED BY CITY STAFF, OR THE APPLICANT SHALL PAY IN | | | LIEU. THE NEW BUS SHELTER WILL NEED TO BE IN OPERATION | | | PRIOR TO CLOSING THE QUADRILLE SIDEWALK FOR ANY | | | CONSTRUCTION. | | | 14. SATISFIED. | | | 15. SATISFIED. | | | 16. SATISFIED. | | | 17. SATISFIED. | | | 18. SATISFIED. | | | 19. CONDITION OF APPROVAL. IN ORDER TO COUNT TANDEM | | | PARKING SPACES AS TWO SPACES, A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT | | | SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR CONFIRMATION OF A VALET ATTENDANT | | | IN CHARGE OF THE OPERATION OF THE PARKING FACILITY | | | DURING ALL OPERATING HOURS. | | | APPLICANT SHALL CONTINUE TO WORK WITH CITY LEGAL | | | DEPARTMENT ON RESTRICTIVE COVENANT FOR VALET PARKING. | | | THIS SHALL BE A CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR SITE PLAN. | | | 20. SATISFIED. | | | 21. SATISFIED. | | | 22. SATISFIED. | | | 23. SATISFIED. | | | 24. SATISFIED. | | | 25. SATISFIED. | | | 26. SATISFIED. | | | 27. SATISFIED. | | | 28. SATISFIED. | | | 29. CONDITION OF APPROVAL. PLEASE PRESERVE THE EXISTING | | | CEMENT CANOPY ON SITE, PER CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION | | | PLANNER. THIS COULD BE MAINTAINED WITHIN THE OPEN | | | SPACE. | | | CONVERSATION ONGOING WITH HISTORIC PRESERVATION | | | DIVISION. | | | 30. SATISFIED. | | | 31. SATISFIED. | | | 32. SATISFIED. | | | 33. SATISFIED. | | | 34. SATISFIED. | | | 35. SATISFIED. | | | 36. SATISFIED. | | | 37. SATISFIED. | | | 38. SATISFIED. | | | 39. SATISFIED. | | | 40. SATISFIED. | | | 41. SATISFIED. | | | 42. SATISFIED. | | | 43. SATISFIED. | | | 44. SATISFIED. | | | 45. SATISFIED. | | | 46. CONDITION OF APPROVAL. PLEASE INDICATE LOCATION OF | | | PROPOSED UTILITIES INCLUDING THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER, | | | FDC CONNECTION, FPL TRANSFORMER, ETC. STAFF RECOMMENDS | | | LOCATING THE UTILITIES WITHIN THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT | | | AND PROVIDING ACCESS TO UTILITY COMPANIES, TO KEEP OFF | | | THE PUBLIC ROW. ALTERNATIVELY, UTILITIES CAN BE LOCATED | | | ALONG THE ALLEY SIDE OF THE BUILDING. SUFFICIENT | | | LANDSCAPE SCREENING IS REQUIRED WHEN UTILITIES ARE | | | LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING AND WITHIN THE ROW. A | | | MINIMUM OF 5 FOOT SIDEWALK CLEARANCE MUST BE MAINTAINED | | | AT ALL LOCATIONS. | | | PLACEMENT OF UTILITIES SHALL BE ONGOING THROUGH | | | PLANNING AND PERMIT PROCESS, SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY | | | ZONING, LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTS. | | | 47. SATISFIED. | | | 48. CONDITION OF APPROVAL. THE MINIMUM FOOTCANDLE, AS | | | MEASURED AT THE BACK EDGE OF THE CURB AND ONE FOOT | | | ABOVE THE SIDEWALK IS 0.6 AND THE MAXIMUM IS 1.0 | | | FOOTCANDLE. PLEASE ADJUST PHOTOMETRICS EXTENDING TO THE | | | ROADWAY CENTERLINES AND PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE PROPOSED | | | LIGHT FIXTURES AS NECESSARY. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH THE | | | ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT TO USE THE CITY APPROVED LIGHT | | | FIXTURE. A SPECIFIC FIXTURE IS REQUIRED FOR ALL ROW. | | | RELOCATE THE PROPOSED LIGHT POLE THAT IS IN THE CENTER | | | OF THE SIDEWALK AT THE CORNER OF DATURA AND DIXIE. | | | 49. SATISFIED. | | | 50. SATISFIED. | | | 51. CONDITION OF APPROVAL. APPLICANT SHALL BE REQUIRED | | | TO MEET REQUIREMENTS OF ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. CONTACT | | | SYBILLE WELTER AT [email protected] FOR MORE | | | INFORMATION. | | | 52. SATISFIED. | | | | | | | | | NEW COMMENTS SEPTEMBER 9, 2019: | | | 53. SATISFIED. | | | 54. SATISFIED | | | 55. SATISFIED | | | 56. SATISFIED | | | 57. SATISFIED | | | 58. SATISFIED | | | 59. SATISFIED. | | | 60. SATISFIED | | | 61. SATISFIED | | | 62. SATISFIED | | | 63. SATISFIED | | | 64. SATISFIED | | | 65. SATISFIED. | | | 66. SATISFIED | | | 67. SATISFIED | | | 68. SATISFIED. | | | 69. SATISFIED | | | 70. SATISFIED | | | 71. SATISFIED | | | 72. SATISFIED | | | 73. SATISFIED | | | 74. SATISFIED | | | 75. SATISFIED | | | 76. SATISFIED. | | | NEW COMMENTS NOVEMBER 5, 2019 | | | 77. SATISFIED. | | | 78. SATISFIED. | | | 79. SATISFIED. | | | 80. SATISFIED | | | 81. SATISFIED. | | | 82. SATISFIED. | | | 83. CONDITION OF APPROVAL: TRUNCATED DOME TO BE | | | ADJUSTED ? SEE CONDITION OF APPROVAL | | | | | | | | | 84. SATISFIED. | | | 85. SATISFIED. | | | 86. SATISFIED. | | | 87. SATISFIED. | | | 88. SATISFIED. | | | 89. SATISFIED. | | | 90. SATISFIED. THERE IS AN AREA ADJACENT TO THE | | | INTERIOR BICYCLE RACKS THAT IS SHOWN DIFFERENTLY ON THE | | | SITE PLAN COMPARED TO CIVIL PLANS. PLEASE CLARIFY | | | 91. SATISFIED. | | | 92. CONDITION OF APPROVAL. PLEASE ADDRESS THE EXITING | | | TRAFFIC POLE BOXES AT PROPERTY?S SOUTHEAST CORNER. | | | PLEASE INCORPORATE INTO LANDSCAPE BED. | | | MAY NEED TO BE RELOCATED IF ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION CANNOT | | | BE FOUND AND AGREED UPON BY STAFF. | | | | | | 93. CONDITION OF APPROVAL.: PLEASE INDICATE PROPOSED | | | LOCATION OF BACKFLOW PREVENTER. PLEASE PLAN TO LOCATE | | | WITHIN LANDSCAPE BED. | | | APPLICANT SHALL MAKE SURE THAT UTILITY IS SCREENED WHEN | | | INSTALLED | | | | | | 94. CONDITION OF APPROVAL: PLEASE ENSURE THAT GROUND | | | MOUNTED FDC IS WITHIN A LANDSCAPE BED OR ALTERNATIVELY, | | | MOUNT ON WALL. | | | 12/18/19: ALL FDC SHALL BE SCREENED BY LANDSCAPE AND/OR | | | PAINTED TO MATCH BUILDING FA?ADE. | | | 95. SATISFIED. | | | 96. SATISFIED | | | 97. SATISFIED | | | 98. SATISFIED | | | 99. SATISFIED | | | 100. SATISFIED | | | 101. SATISFIED | | | 102. SATISFIED | | | 103. SATISFIED | | | 104. CONDITION OF APPROVAL: | | | THERE CAN BE MODIFICATIONS TO THE DESIGN OF THE FIVE | | | PARKING SPACES OFF THE ALLEY TO ACCOMMODATE THE | | | CONCRETE COLUMNS FOR THE CONCRETE CANOPY (FOR EXAMPLE, | | | A 3? WIDE LANDSCAPE ISLAND WITH THE CONCRETE COLUMN | | | BASE). | | | 105. CONDITION OF APPROVAL: | | | ALL ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED TO THE HEIGHT | | | OF THE EQUIPMENT. | | | 106. SATISFIED | | | 107. SATISFIED | | | 108. CONDITION OF APPROVAL: PLEASE INCLUDE PROPOSED | | | BICYCLE RACK WITH THE REFERENCE TO THE BUS SHELTER, AS | | | REQUIRED BY PALM TRAN. | | | 109. CONDITION OF APPROVAL: PLEASE SHIFT THE LIGHT POLE | | | FROM THE CENTER OF THE PROPOSED PLAZA AT THE | | | DATURA/DIXIE CORNER TO ALIGN WITH THE LIGHT POLES | | | PROPOSED ALONG DATURA STREET. PLEASE SHIFT THE PROPOSED | | | SOUTHERNMOST POLE ALONG QUADRILLE BOULEVARD FROM WITHIN | | | THE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO THE CROSSWALK. | | | 110. CONDITION OF APPROVAL: PLEASE COORDINATE WITH | | | LANDSCAPE PLANNER AND STORMWATER ON LOCATION OF | | | EXFILTRATION TRENCH PIPES. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-20-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
elevesqu |
Date |
12-20-2019 |
Time |
11:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
elevesqu |
Date |
12-20-2019 |
Time |
11:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-12-20 11:23:46 | COMMENTS SHALL BE LABELED ?SATISFIED?, ?NOT SATISFIED?, | | | ?PARTIALLY SATISFIED?, OR ?ONGOING? | | | ANY NEW COMMENTS OR FURTHER EXPLANATION OF OLD COMMENTS | | | SHALL BE BOLDED. | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. | | | 2. SATISFIED. | | | 3. SATISFIED. | | | 4. ONGOING. PER SECTION 94-54(A)(3), FORMAL SITE PLAN | | | APPROVALS INVOLVING THE TDR PROGRAM SHALL BE APPROVED | | | BY DAC AND THE CERTIFICATE OF TRANSFER SHALL BE | | | OBTAINED PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF THE SITE PLAN | | | APPROVAL. | | | CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL SHALL BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO | | | EXPIRATION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL. | | | 5. SATISFIED. | | | 6. SATISFIED. | | | 7. SATISFIED. | | | 8. SATISFIED. | | | 9. ONGOING. IF VALET IS PROPOSING UTILIZING EXISTING OR | | | PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING FOR VALET, THE APPLICANT | | | SHALL PAY FOR THE USE OF THOSE OCCUPIED SPACES IN | | | AMOUNT AS ESTABLISHED BY THE CITY AND IN LOCATIONS | | | APPROVED BY THE CITY PARKING ADMINISTRATOR. THIS WOULD | | | UTILIZE EXISTING ON-STREET PARKING SPACES AND NOT | | | INTERFERE WITH SIDEWALK CONNECTIVITY. | | | APPLICANT TO WORK WITH PARKING ADMINISTRATION ON | | | PARKING SPACES. WILL NOT HOLD UP PROJECT SITE PLAN | | | REVIEW (WILL BE CONDITION OF APPROVAL) | | | 10. SATISFIED. | | | 11. SATISFIED. | | | 12. SATISFIED. | | | 13. ONGOING. PALM TRAN HAS PERMITTED THE USE OF THE | | | BROADSTONE BUS SHELTER, BUT IT WILL NEED A BACK | | | INSTALLED. THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE SOME | | | ARCHITECTURAL RENDERINGS OF PROPOSED BACKING TO BE | | | REVIEWED BY CITY STAFF, OR THE APPLICANT SHALL PAY IN | | | LIEU. CAN BE A CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR SITE PLAN. THE | | | NEW BUS SHELTER WILL NEED TO BE IN OPERATION PRIOR TO | | | CLOSING THE QUADRILLE SIDEWALK FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION. | | | 14. SATISFIED. | | | 15. SATISFIED. | | | 16. SATISFIED. | | | 17. SATISFIED. | | | 18. SATISFIED. | | | 19. ONGOING. IN ORDER TO COUNT TANDEM PARKING SPACES AS | | | TWO SPACES, A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT SHALL BE REQUIRED | | | FOR CONFIRMATION OF A VALET ATTENDANT IN CHARGE OF THE | | | OPERATION OF THE PARKING FACILITY DURING ALL OPERATING | | | HOURS. | | | APPLICANT SHALL CONTINUE TO WORK WITH CITY LEGAL | | | DEPARTMENT ON RESTRICTIVE COVENANT FOR VALET PARKING. | | | THIS SHALL BE A CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR SITE PLAN. | | | 20. SATISFIED. | | | 21. SATISFIED. | | | 22. SATISFIED. | | | 23. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE DATA ON BUILDING | | | FOOTPRINT MAXIMUM IN SITE TABLE PER TABLE IV-50 | | | 24. SATISFIED. | | | 25. SATISFIED. | | | 26. SATISFIED. | | | 27. SATISFIED. | | | 28. SATISFIED. | | | 29. ONGOING. PLEASE PRESERVE THE EXISTING CEMENT CANOPY | | | ON SITE, PER CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNER. THIS | | | COULD BE MAINTAINED WITHIN THE OPEN SPACE. | | | CONVERSATION ONGOING WITH HISTORIC PRESERVATION | | | DIVISION. SHALL BE A CONDITION OF APPROVAL. | | | | | | 12/18/19: SEE NEW COMMENT # 104 | | | 30. SATISFIED. | | | 31. SATISFIED. | | | 32. SATISFIED. | | | 33. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL | | | DETAIL OF ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT MATERIALS ON BUILDING | | | ON ELEVATION PLANS. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DETAIL OF THE ALUMINUM FRAME | | | ON THE PARKING GARAGE ? IS IT FULLY OPEN? ANY | | | ADDITIONAL SCREENING BEHIND THE FRAME? EXAMPLE WOULD BE | | | BENEFICIAL. PLEASE PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE OF THE BRICK | | | ACCENT, FIXED DECORATIVE SHUTTERS, DECORATIVE BRACKETS, | | | ETC. | | | | | | 12/18/19: SEE NEW COMMENT # 102 | | | 34. SATISFIED. | | | 35. SATISFIED. | | | 36. SATISFIED. | | | 37. SATISFIED. | | | 38. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A HARDSCAPE PLAN WITH | | | DETAILS OF PAVERS, SEATING, ETC. | | | SOME HARDSCAPE DETAILS ARE NEEDED FOR DAC REVIEW OF | | | PAVERS, SEATING, LANDSCAPE BED AREAS (ALONG DATURA | | | STREET APPEARS TO HAVE BENCHES AROUND LANDSCAPE AREA), | | | ETC. PLEASE PROVIDE WHAT YOU CAN; STAFF AND THE DAC | | | MEMBERS REALIZE THESE MAY CHANGE WITH PERMITTING AND | | | CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 12/18/19: SEE NEW COMMENT #99 | | | | | | 39. SATISFIED. PLEASE SEE TABLE IV-7 FOR OPEN SPACE | | | STANDARDS. CURRENTLY THE PASSAGEWAY PUBLIC OPEN TYPE IS | | | REQUIRED. STAFF IS CURRENTLY REVIEWING THIS REQUIREMENT | | | FOR APPLICABILITY FOR THIS SITE. | | | CODE AMENDMENT UNDERWAY THAT WILL PERMIT UPGRADING | | | PRIVATE OPEN SPACE TO PUBLIC OPEN SPACE IN SOME CASES | | | WITHIN THE DMP. | | | | | | 40. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADDRESS SPECIFIC PRIVATE AND | | | PUBLIC OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS PER TABLE IV-6 AND TABLE | | | IV-7, INCLUDING TYPE OF OPEN SPACE (COURTYARD GARDEN, | | | TERRACE, ETC.) FOR EACH OPEN SPACE AND SEE THE | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR VEGETATED SPACE, SEATING, ETC. | | | CODE AMENDMENT UNDERWAY THAT WILL PERMIT UPGRADING | | | PRIVATE OPEN SPACE TO PUBLIC OPEN SPACE IN SOME CASES | | | WITHIN THE DMP. SATISFIED. | | | 41. SATISFIED. | | | 42. SATISFIED. | | | 43. SATISFIED. | | | 44. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PER SECTION 93-113, BICYCLE | | | PARKING FOR THE PUBLIC SHALL BE PROVIDED AT A MINIMUM | | | OF ONE SPACE PER EVERY 100 FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE. THE | | | POST AND LOOP RACK IS RECOMMENDED FOR THE PUBLIC ROW. | | | PLEASE INDICATE EXACT BICYCLE RACK DETAIL ON PLANS. | | | THE SITE PLAN SHEET SP-1 SHOWS A DIFFERENT TYPE OF | | | BICYCLE RACK, PLEASE AMEND. | | | 45. SATISFIED. | | | 46. ONGOING. PLEASE INDICATE LOCATION OF PROPOSED | | | UTILITIES INCLUDING THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER, FDC | | | CONNECTION, FPL TRANSFORMER, ETC. STAFF RECOMMENDS | | | LOCATING THE UTILITIES WITHIN THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT | | | AND PROVIDING ACCESS TO UTILITY COMPANIES, TO KEEP OFF | | | THE PUBLIC ROW. ALTERNATIVELY, UTILITIES CAN BE LOCATED | | | ALONG THE ALLEY SIDE OF THE BUILDING. SUFFICIENT | | | LANDSCAPE SCREENING IS REQUIRED WHEN UTILITIES ARE | | | LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING AND WITHIN THE ROW. A | | | MINIMUM OF 5 FOOT SIDEWALK CLEARANCE MUST BE MAINTAINED | | | AT ALL LOCATIONS. | | | SEE COMMENT 94. PLACEMENT OF UTILITIES SHALL BE ONGOING | | | THROUGH PLANNING AND PERMIT PROCESS, SUBJECT TO REVIEW | | | BY ZONING, LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTS. | | | THIS SHALL BE A SITE PLAN CONDITION OF APPROVAL. | | | 47. SATISFIED. | | | 48. NOT SATISFIED. THE MINIMUM FOOTCANDLE, AS MEASURED | | | AT THE BACK EDGE OF THE CURB AND ONE FOOT ABOVE THE | | | SIDEWALK IS 0.6 AND THE MAXIMUM IS 1.0 FOOTCANDLE. | | | PLEASE ADJUST PHOTOMETRICS EXTENDING TO THE ROADWAY | | | CENTERLINES AND PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE PROPOSED LIGHT | | | FIXTURES AS NECESSARY. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH THE | | | ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT TO USE THE CITY APPROVED LIGHT | | | FIXTURE. A SPECIFIC FIXTURE IS REQUIRED FOR ALL ROW. | | | THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE SITE PLAN OR | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. THERE IS A LIGHT POLE PROPOSED WHERE A | | | TREE IS PROPOSED ON THE CORNER OF DATURA AND QUADRILLE | | | ON THE DATURA SIDE. PLEASE RELOCATE THE PROPOSED LIGHT | | | POLE THAT IS IN THE CENTER OF THE SIDEWALK AT THE | | | CORNER OF DATURA AND DIXIE. THE PLAN SHOWS A LIGHT POLE | | | PROPOSED IN THE ON STREET PARKING ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY. | | | | | | 12/18/19: SEE NEW COMMENT # 109 | | | | | | 49. SATISFIED. | | | 50. SATISFIED. | | | 51. ONGOING. APPLICANT SHALL BE REQUIRED TO MEET | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. CONTACT SYBILLE | | | WELTER AT [email protected] FOR MORE INFORMATION. | | | 12/18/19: STAFF RECOMMENDS CONTACTING AIPP COORDINATOR | | | AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO GET PROCESS MOVING. AIPP WILL | | | HOLD UP C.O. IF REQUIREMENT NOT COMPLETED. | | | 52. SATISFIED. | | | | | | | | | NEW COMMENTS SEPTEMBER 9, 2019: | | | 53. SATISFIED. | | | 54. SATISFIED | | | 55. SATISFIED | | | 56. SATISFIED | | | 57. SATISFIED | | | 58. SATISFIED | | | 59. SATISFIED. | | | 60. SATISFIED | | | 61. SATISFIED | | | 62. SATISFIED | | | 63. SATISFIED | | | 64. SATISFIED | | | 65. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE UPDATE THE ELEVATIONS | | | TO INCLUDE LANDSCAPE PLANS. PLEASE INCLUDE ADDITIONAL | | | ARCHITECTURAL MATERIAL LABELS INCLUDING GLASS, FAUX | | | GLASS, STUCCO, ETC. | | | PLEASE INCLUDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION | | | | | | 12/18/19: SEE NEW COMMENT # 102 | | | 66. SATISFIED | | | 67. SATISFIED | | | 68. SATISFIED. | | | 69. SATISFIED | | | 70. SATISFIED | | | 71. SATISFIED | | | 72. SATISFIED | | | 73. SATISFIED | | | 74. SATISFIED | | | 75. SATISFIED | | | 76. SATISFIED. | | | NEW COMMENTS NOVEMBER 5, 2019 | | | 77. SATISFIED. | | | 78. SATISFIED. | | | 79. SATISFIED. | | | 80. NOT SATISFIED: PLEASE CONSIDER THE ADDITION OF | | | ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT ON THE STAIRWAYS TO ALLEVIATE | | | THE ACTIVE USE LINER VARIANCE. | | | 12/18/19: SIGNAGE CANNOT COUNT TOWARDS ARCHITECTURAL | | | TREATMENT. PER DAC CONDITION, PLEASE INCLUDE ADDITIONAL | | | ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT AS APPROPRIATE FOR THE FA?ADE | | | TO BREAK UP THE BLANK WALL. | | | 81. SATISFIED. | | | 82. SATISFIED. | | | 83. NOT SATISFIED: TRUNCATED DOME FOR ADA COMPLIANCE IS | | | NOT APPARENT ON ANY PLANS. PLEASE CLARIFY INTERSECTION | | | CROSSWALK CONNECTIVITY | | | | | | 12/18/19: TRUNCATED DOMES ARE NOT ILLUSTRATED ON PLANS. | | | PLEASE INCLUDE. | | | | | | 84. SATISFIED. | | | 85. ONGOING. PLEASE ADJUST THE DROP OFF AREA ON DATURA | | | STREET TO THE SIZE OF A PARALLEL PARKING SPACE (22 | | | FEET) TO ACCOMMODATE THE REQUIRED SHADE TREE PER EVERY | | | 30 FEET | | | SEE NEW COMMENT # 98 | | | | | | 86. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD A SHADE TREE TO THE SOUTH | | | SIDE OF DIXIE HIGHWAY NEAR THE DIXIE AND DATURA | | | INTERSECTION (REMOVE HOLLY TREES PER LANDSCAPE COMMENTS | | | AND REPLACE WITH OAK TREES) | | | 12/18/19: COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 87. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE REMOVE THE LOW WALL | | | FROM THE BISTRO OUTDOOR AREA AS THIS AREA IS BEING | | | CONSIDERED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE (IN TIME FOR DAC SUBMITTAL | | | ? ON PLANS SUBMITTED NO LATER THAN 11/27) | | | 12/18/19: WALL REMOVED, BUT STAFF HAS QUESTION ABOUT | | | PLANTER BED. SEE NEW COMMENT # 100 | | | | | | 88. SATISFIED. | | | 89. SATISFIED. | | | 90. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THERE IS AN AREA ADJACENT TO | | | THE INTERIOR BICYCLE RACKS THAT IS SHOWN DIFFERENTLY ON | | | THE SITE PLAN COMPARED TO CIVIL PLANS. PLEASE CLARIFY | | | 12/18/19: BICYCLE RACK LOCATION STILL SHOWN IN OLD | | | LOCATION ON SHEET SP-1. | | | | | | 91. SATISFIED. | | | 92. ONGOING. PLEASE ADDRESS THE EXITING TRAFFIC POLE | | | BOXES AT PROPERTY?S SOUTHEAST CORNER. PLEASE | | | INCORPORATE INTO LANDSCAPE BED. | | | | | | 12/18/19: PLEASE ADDRESS PER DAC CONDITION OF APPROVAL. | | | PLEASE LOOK AT ALL EXISTING BOXES AND PROVIDE DESIGNS | | | TO INCORPORATE INTO A LANDSCAPE BED. THE PEDESTRIAN | | | PATH OF TRAVEL CANNOT BE IMPEDED OR REDIRECTED AROUND | | | BOXES. MAY NEED TO BE RELOCATED IF ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION | | | CANNOT BE FOUND AND AGREED UPON BY STAFF. | | | | | | 93. C.O.A.: PLEASE INDICATE PROPOSED LOCATION OF | | | BACKFLOW PREVENTER. PLEASE PLAN TO LOCATE WITHIN | | | LANDSCAPE BED. | | | 12/18/19: APPLICANT SHALL MAKE SURE THAT UTILITY IS | | | SCREENED WHEN INSTALLED | | | | | | 94. C.O.A.: PLEASE ENSURE THAT GROUND MOUNTED FDC IS | | | WITHIN A LANDSCAPE BED OR ALTERNATIVELY, MOUNT ON WALL. | | | 12/18/19: ALL FDC SHALL BE SCREENED BY LANDSCAPE AND/OR | | | PAINTED TO MATCH BUILDING FA?ADE. | | | | | | 95. ONGOING. PLEASE PROVIDE GROUND LEVEL 3D RENDERINGS | | | FOR DAC APPLICATION (NO LATER THAN 11/27) ? INCLUDE | | | LANDSCAPE AT PLANTING LEVEL. PLEASE INCLUDE DAY TIME | | | RENDERING. | | | ADDITIONAL RENDERINGS NEEDED: FOR EXAMPLE FOR DATURA | | | STREET, QUADRILLE/ALLEY CORNER, FULL HEIGHT FROM GROUND | | | OF DIXIE/ALLEY CORNER | | | | | | 96. ONGOING: PLEASE NOTE, NEXT SITE PLAN RESUBMITTAL | | | WILL HAVE A REQUIRED RESUBMITTAL FEE OF $300 | | | (RESUBMITTAL FEE, CHARGED AFTER 1ST RESUBMITTAL) | | | 12/18/19: RESUBMITTAL FEE OF $300 REQUIRED FOR NEXT | | | RESUBMITTAL | | | | | | NEW COMMENTS DEC. 18, 2019 | | | 97. PLEASE PROVIDE EXAMPLE OF RAISED DECORATIVE PANEL. | | | PAINTED THE SAME COLOR, WITH A DEPTH OF ONLY 2? AT THE | | | 8TH FLOOR, WOULD THIS FEATURE BE NOTICEABLE? PERHAPS AN | | | ALTERNATIVE FEATURE SHOULD BE USED IF THIS WON?T BE | | | APPARENT AT THE GROUND LEVEL. | | | 98. STAFF RECOMMENDS A COMPROMISE TO THE PROPOSED | | | CANOPY, TO PROVIDE SHADE TREES EVERY 35? TO ACCOMMODATE | | | DAC RECOMMENDATION WITH REQUIREMENT FOR SHADE TREES. | | | 99. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAIL ON THE BANDED FEATURE WITHIN | | | THE PLAZA AT THE PROJECT?S SOUTHEAST CORNER. ARE THESE | | | STEPS? | | | 100. IS THERE A PLANTER BED PROPOSED AROUND THE BISTRO | | | AREA? PLEASE PROVIDE THE PROPOSED HEIGHT OF PLANTING | | | SURROUNDING THE AREA. THE PATIO AREA CANNOT BE TREATED | | | AS A PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREA AS IT IS INCLUDED IN THE | | | PUBLIC OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS. THE COVER SHEET | | | ELEVATION STILL SHOWS A LOW WALL, PLEASE AMEND. | | | 101. SIGNAGE CANNOT BE CONSIDERED ARCHITECTURAL | | | TREATMENT. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE CHECK REQUIREMENT FOR | | | VERTICAL SIGNS IN SECTION 94-110. SIGN BANDS CANNOT BE | | | UTILIZED IF A VERTICAL SIGN IS USED. | | | 102. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL MATERIAL (IMAGES AND | | | EXAMPLES) OF THE BRICK ACCENT, GARAGE SCREENING, FIXED | | | DECORATIVE SHUTTER, | | | 103. LANDSCAPE IS ILLUSTRATED ON THE PROPOSED RENDERING | | | AT QUADRILLE/DATURA STREET ABOVE THE 3RD STORY. THE | | | FLOOR PLANS SHOW THIS AREA TO BE UNPLANTED, BUT STAFF | | | RECOMMENDS KEEPING THIS LANDSCAPE AREA TO ENHANCE THAT | | | CORNER, ESPECIALLY IN LIEU OF ACTIVE USE LINER. | | | 104. THERE CAN BE MODIFICATIONS TO THE DESIGN OF THE | | | FIVE PARKING SPACES OFF THE ALLEY TO ACCOMMODATE THE | | | CONCRETE COLUMNS FOR THE CONCRETE CANOPY (FOR EXAMPLE, | | | A 3? WIDE LANDSCAPE ISLAND WITH THE CONCRETE COLUMN | | | BASE). | | | 105. PLEASE INCLUDE A NOTE STATING THAT ALL ROOFTOP | | | EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED TO THE HEIGHT OF THE | | | EQUIPMENT AND/OR PAINTED TO MATCH THE BUILDING FA?ADE | | | COLOR. PLEASE INCLUDE A NOTE ON THE ELEVATIONS THAT ALL | | | WALL-MOUNTED ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PAINTED TO | | | MATCH THE BUILDING COLOR. THESE TYPES OF ITEMS COULD | | | HOLD UP ZONING SIGN OFF AT TIME OF CO. | | | 106. THERE APPEARS TO BE SOME DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE | | | WIDTH OF PORTIONS OF THE WALL (FOR EXAMPLE, WIDTH | | | BETWEEN WALL ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY TO FIRST WINDOW AND | | | THE LINE OF VERTICAL WINDOWS CLOSEST TO THE ALLEY ALONG | | | THE DIXIE ELEVATION ) WHEN COMPARING THE ELEVATIONS TO | | | THE FLOOR PLAN. PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE PROPOSED | | | ELEVATIONS FULLY ALIGN WITH PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS. | | | 107. ALONG FACADES WHERE THERE ARE VERTICAL ALIGNMENT | | | OF WINDOWS, THERE ARE SOME FLOORS WHERE THE WINDOWS ARE | | | NOT CONTINUED. PLEASE REORIENTATE THE UNITS TO INCLUDE | | | WINDOWS TO CONTINUE THE RHYTHM OF FENESTRATION, OR LOOK | | | AT OPTIONS FOR FAUX WINDOWS TO PREVENT GAPS AND BLANK | | | STUCCO PORTIONS. (EXAMPLES: DIXIE/DATURA CORNER- | | | WINDOWS ON FLOORS 5-8, NOT ON FLOOR 3 AND 4. | | | DIXIE/ALLEY (ALLEY SIDE)- WINDOWS ON FLOOR 5-8, NOT ON | | | 3 AND 4. DIXIE FA?ADE ? NO WINDOWS FLOOR 3 AND 4). | | | 108. PLEASE INCLUDE PROPOSED BICYCLE RACK WITH THE | | | REFERENCE TO THE BUS SHELTER, AS REQUIRED BY PALM TRAN. | | | 109. PLEASE SHIFT THE LIGHT POLE FROM THE CENTER OF THE | | | PROPOSED PLAZA AT THE DATURA/DIXIE CORNER TO ALIGN WITH | | | THE LIGHT POLES PROPOSED ALONG DATURA STREET. PLEASE | | | SHIFT THE PROPOSED SOUTHERNMOST POLE ALONG QUADRILLE | | | BOULEVARD FROM WITHIN THE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO THE | | | CROSSWALK. | | | 110. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH LANDSCAPE PLANNER AND | | | STORMWATER ON LOCATION OF EXFILTRATION TRENCH PIPES. | | | PREVIOUS LANDSCAPE COMMENT FOR RELOCATING FROM UNDER | | | TREES WAS NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-05-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
elevesqu |
Date |
11-05-2019 |
Time |
16:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
elevesqu |
Date |
11-05-2019 |
Time |
16:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-11-05 16:48:26 | ONGOING COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS: | | | | | | 13. ONGOING. PALM TRAN HAS PERMITTED THE USE OF THE | | | BROADSTONE BUS SHELTER, BUT IT WILL NEED A BACK | | | INSTALLED. THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE SOME | | | ARCHITECTURAL RENDERINGS OF PROPOSED BACKING TO BE | | | REVIEWED BY CITY STAFF. CAN BE A CONDITION OF APPROVAL | | | FOR SITE PLAN. THE NEW BUS SHELTER WILL NEED TO BE IN | | | OPERATION PRIOR TO CLOSING THE QUADRILLE SIDEWALK FOR | | | ANY CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 19. ONGOING. IN ORDER TO COUNT TANDEM PARKING SPACES AS | | | TWO SPACES, A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT SHALL BE REQUIRED | | | FOR CONFIRMATION OF A VALET ATTENDANT IN CHARGE OF THE | | | OPERATION OF THE PARKING FACILITY DURING ALL OPERATING | | | HOURS. | | | APPLICANT SHALL CONTINUE TO WORK WITH CITY LEGAL | | | DEPARTMENT ON RESTRICTIVE COVENANT FOR VALET PARKING. | | | THIS SHALL BE A CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR SITE PLAN. | | | | | | 29. ONGOING. PLEASE PRESERVE THE EXISTING CEMENT CANOPY | | | ON SITE, PER CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNER. THIS | | | COULD BE MAINTAINED WITHIN THE OPEN SPACE. | | | CONVERSATION ONGOING WITH HISTORIC PRESERVATION | | | DIVISION. SHALL BE A CONDITION OF APPROVAL. | | | | | | 33. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL | | | DETAIL OF ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT MATERIALS ON BUILDING | | | ON ELEVATION PLANS. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DETAIL OF THE ALUMINUM FRAME | | | ON THE PARKING GARAGE ? IS IT FULLY OPEN? ANY | | | ADDITIONAL SCREENING BEHIND THE FRAME? EXAMPLE WOULD BE | | | BENEFICIAL. PLEASE PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE OF THE BRICK | | | ACCENT, FIXED DECORATIVE SHUTTERS, DECORATIVE BRACKETS, | | | ETC. THIS ARE REQUESTED FOR DAC REVIEW. (NEED IN TIME | | | FOR DAC SUBMITTAL ? ON PLANS SUBMITTED NO LATER THAN | | | 11/27) | | | | | | 36. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE CHECK CRITERIA FOR FDOT | | | SIGHT TRIANGLE FOR PROPOSED TREES AT STREET CORNERS. | | | A TREE AT THE CORNER OF QUADRILLE AND DATURA IS STILL | | | WITHIN THE SIGHT TRIANGLE. | | | | | | 38. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A HARDSCAPE PLAN WITH | | | DETAILS OF PAVERS, SEATING, ETC. | | | SOME HARDSCAPE DETAILS ARE NEEDED FOR DAC REVIEW OF | | | PAVERS, SEATING, LANDSCAPE BED AREAS (ALONG DATURA | | | STREET APPEARS TO HAVE BENCHES AROUND LANDSCAPE AREA), | | | ETC. PLEASE PROVIDE WHAT YOU CAN; STAFF AND THE DAC | | | MEMBERS REALIZE THESE MAY CHANGE WITH PERMITTING AND | | | CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 39. SATISFIED. PLEASE SEE TABLE IV-7 FOR OPEN SPACE | | | STANDARDS. CURRENTLY THE PASSAGEWAY PUBLIC OPEN TYPE IS | | | REQUIRED. STAFF IS CURRENTLY REVIEWING THIS REQUIREMENT | | | FOR APPLICABILITY FOR THIS SITE. | | | CODE AMENDMENT UNDERWAY THAT WILL PERMIT UPGRADING | | | PRIVATE OPEN SPACE TO PUBLIC OPEN SPACE IN SOME CASES | | | WITHIN THE DMP. | | | | | | | | | 44. NOT SATISFIED. PER SECTION 93-113, BICYCLE PARKING | | | FOR THE PUBLIC SHALL BE PROVIDED AT A MINIMUM OF ONE | | | SPACE PER EVERY 100 FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE. THE POST | | | AND LOOP RACK IS RECOMMENDED FOR THE PUBLIC ROW. PLEASE | | | INDICATE EXACT BICYCLE RACK DETAIL ON PLANS. | | | STAFF CALCULATES THE REQUIRED PRIVATE BICYCLE PARKING | | | TO BE 7 SPACES, WITH APPROXIMATELY 670 FEET OF ROW. | | | ADDITIONALLY, THE LOCATION OF THE PUBLIC BICYCLE RACKS | | | WITHIN THE PRIVATE OUTDOOR DINING AREA DOES NOT SATISFY | | | REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE RELOCATE FOR A PUBLIC USE. | | | | | | 46. ONGOING. PLEASE INDICATE LOCATION OF PROPOSED | | | UTILITIES INCLUDING THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER, FDC | | | CONNECTION, FPL TRANSFORMER, ETC. STAFF RECOMMENDS | | | LOCATING THE UTILITIES WITHIN THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT | | | AND PROVIDING ACCESS TO UTILITY COMPANIES, TO KEEP OFF | | | THE PUBLIC ROW. ALTERNATIVELY, UTILITIES CAN BE LOCATED | | | ALONG THE ALLEY SIDE OF THE BUILDING. SUFFICIENT | | | LANDSCAPE SCREENING IS REQUIRED WHEN UTILITIES ARE | | | LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING AND WITHIN THE ROW. A | | | MINIMUM OF 5 FOOT SIDEWALK CLEARANCE MUST BE MAINTAINED | | | AT ALL LOCATIONS. | | | SEE NEW COMMENT 94. PLACEMENT OF UTILITIES SHALL BE | | | ONGOING THROUGH PLANNING AND PERMIT PROCESS, SUBJECT TO | | | REVIEW BY ZONING, LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND BUILDING | | | DEPARTMENTS. THIS SHALL BE A SITE PLAN CONDITION OF | | | APPROVAL. | | | | | | 48. NOT SATISFIED. THE MINIMUM FOOTCANDLE, AS MEASURED | | | AT THE BACK EDGE OF THE CURB AND ONE FOOT ABOVE THE | | | SIDEWALK IS 0.6 AND THE MAXIMUM IS 1.0 FOOTCANDLE. | | | PLEASE ADJUST PHOTOMETRICS EXTENDING TO THE ROADWAY | | | CENTERLINES AND PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE PROPOSED LIGHT | | | FIXTURES AS NECESSARY. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH THE | | | ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT TO USE THE CITY APPROVED LIGHT | | | FIXTURE. A SPECIFIC FIXTURE IS REQUIRED FOR ALL ROW. | | | THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE SITE PLAN OR | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. THERE IS A LIGHT POLE PROPOSED WHERE A | | | TREE IS PROPOSED ON THE CORNER OF DATURA AND QUADRILLE | | | ON THE DATURA SIDE. PLEASE RELOCATE THE PROPOSED LIGHT | | | POLE THAT IS IN THE CENTER OF THE SIDEWALK AT THE | | | CORNER OF DATURA AND DIXIE. THE PLAN SHOWS A LIGHT POLE | | | PROPOSED IN THE ON STREET PARKING ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY. | | | | | | 65. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE UPDATE THE ELEVATIONS | | | TO INCLUDE LANDSCAPE PLANS. PLEASE INCLUDE ADDITIONAL | | | ARCHITECTURAL MATERIAL LABELS INCLUDING GLASS, FAUX | | | GLASS, STUCCO, ETC. | | | PLEASE INCLUDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ? SEE COMMENT 33 | | | | | | 76. PLEASE INCLUDE ADA PARKING SPACES. SEE BUILDING | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | NEW COMMENTS NOVEMBER 5, 2019 | | | 77. THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE NUMBER OF BEDS | | | FOR GROUP HOMES LISTED IN THE VEHICULAR PARKING AREA | | | COMPARED TO THE UNIT PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY BED | | | NUMBER. PLEASE UPDATE AS NECESSARY. | | | 78. AS THE CODE AMENDMENT BEING PROCESSED TO PERMIT | | | PRIVATE OPEN SPACE ON THE GROUND FLOOR LEVEL WILL TREAT | | | THE OPEN SPACE AS PUBLIC, THE VARIANCE FOR THE SETBACK | | | FROM DIXIE HIGHWAY IS NOT REQUIRED. PLEASE REMOVE FROM | | | DATA TABLES AND FROM THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT (AND | | | DAC APPLICATION IF NECESSARY) | | | 79. PLEASE SHOW THE GROUND FLOOR PLAN ON SITE PLAN | | | SHEET SP.1 | | | 80. PLEASE CONSIDER THE ADDITION OF ARCHITECTURAL | | | TREATMENT ON THE STAIRWAYS TO ALLEVIATE THE ACTIVE USE | | | LINER VARIANCE. | | | 81. THE NORTHERN PORTION OF FA?ADE ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY | | | THAT IS ADJACENT TO PARKING SPOTS CANNOT BE COUNTED | | | TOWARDS ACTIVE USE. HOWEVER, THE PORTION OF THE DINING | | | ROOM FA?ADE THAT IS SET FURTHER BACK BUT FRONTS DIXIE | | | HIGHWAY CAN BE COUNTED. PLEASE ADJUST. | | | 82. PLEASE ADD A CONTEXTUAL MASSING ELEVATION FOR | | | DATURA STREET FACING NORTH FOR DAC SUBMITTAL (NO LATER | | | THAN 11/27) | | | 83. TRUNCATED DOME FOR ADA COMPLIANCE IS NOT APPARENT | | | ON ANY PLANS. PLEASE CLARIFY INTERSECTION CROSSWALK | | | CONNECTIVITY | | | 84. ADA PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED EVEN FOR VALET | | | OPERATION. PLEASE ADJUST AS NECESSARY. MUST BE DONE | | | PRIOR TO DAC (PLANS CHANGED NO LATER THAN 11/27) | | | 85. PLEASE ADJUST THE DROP OFF AREA ON DATURA STREET TO | | | THE SIZE OF A PARALLEL PARKING SPACE (22 FEET) TO | | | ACCOMMODATE THE REQUIRED SHADE TREE PER EVERY 30 FEET | | | 86. PLEASE ADD A SHADE TREE TO THE SOUTH SIDE OF DIXIE | | | HIGHWAY NEAR THE DIXIE AND DATURA INTERSECTION (REMOVE | | | HOLLY TREES PER LANDSCAPE COMMENTS AND REPLACE WITH OAK | | | TREES) | | | 87. PLEASE REMOVE THE LOW WALL FROM THE BISTRO OUTDOOR | | | AREA AS THIS AREA IS BEING CONSIDERED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE | | | (IN TIME FOR DAC SUBMITTAL ? ON PLANS SUBMITTED NO | | | LATER THAN 11/27) | | | 88. PLEASE REMOVE REFERENCE TO ?PRIVATE TERRACE ALONG | | | DATURA STREET? FROM THE SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY SIDE | | | ELEVATION ON SHEET A-3.2 AS THIS IS BEING TREATED AS | | | PUBLIC OPEN SPACE (IN TIME FOR DAC SUBMITTAL ? ON PLANS | | | SUBMITTED NO LATER THAN 11/27) | | | 89. PLEASE CONSIDER THE ADDITION OF COLOR INTO THE | | | LANDSCAPE PALETTE ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY AND QUADRILLE | | | BOULEVARD | | | 90. THERE IS AN AREA ADJACENT TO THE INTERIOR BICYCLE | | | RACKS THAT IS SHOWN DIFFERENTLY ON THE SITE PLAN | | | COMPARED TO CIVIL PLANS. PLEASE CLARIFY | | | 91. CONSIDER A CORRIDOR OR DOOR FROM THE OUTSIDE TO | | | ACCESS THE INTERIOR BICYCLE RACKS TO ELIMINATE THE NEED | | | FOR CYCLISTS TO CROSS OVER THE GARAGE RAMP ENTRANCE. | | | THE LOCATION OF THE RACKS DOES NOT WORK WELL FOR | | | INGRESS AND EGRESS | | | 92. PLEASE ADDRESS THE EXITING TRAFFIC POLE BOXES AT | | | PROPERTY?S SOUTHEAST CORNER. PLEASE INCORPORATE INTO | | | LANDSCAPE BED. | | | 93. PLEASE INDICATE PROPOSED LOCATION OF BACKFLOW | | | PREVENTER. PLEASE PLAN TO LOCATE WITHIN LANDSCAPE BED. | | | 94. PLEASE ENSURE THAT GROUND MOUNTED FDC IS WITHIN A | | | LANDSCAPE BED OR ALTERNATIVELY, MOUNT ON WALL. | | | 95. PLEASE PROVIDE GROUND LEVEL 3D RENDERINGS FOR DAC | | | APPLICATION (NO LATER THAN 11/27) ? INCLUDE LANDSCAPE | | | AT PLANTING LEVEL. PLEASE INCLUDE DAY TIME RENDERING. | | | 96. PLEASE NOTE, NEXT SITE PLAN RESUBMITTAL WILL HAVE A | | | REQUIRED RESUBMITTAL FEE OF $300 (RESUBMITTAL FEE, | | | CHARGED AFTER 1ST RESUBMITTAL) | | | 97. THE STAIRWELL ALONG QUADRILLE BOULEVARD HAS A | | | DOORWAY THAT OPENS INTO THE SIDEWALK AREA, WHICH DOES | | | NOT WORK. THIS WILL NEED TO BE RECESSED. | | | | | | | | | ELIZABETH LEVESQUE, AICP, URBAN DESIGN PLANNER | | | [email protected] | | | 561 822 1426 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-09-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
elevesqu |
Date |
09-09-2019 |
Time |
16:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
elevesqu |
Date |
09-09-2019 |
Time |
16:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-09-09 16:30:09 | 1. ONGOING. THE PROJECT CANNOT PROCEED TO DOWNTOWN | | | ACTION COMMITTEE UNTIL THE DETAILS OF THE RESTRICTIVE | | | COVENANT AND AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT | | | (JULY 19, 2004) ARE RESOLVED. PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF THE | | | DOCUMENTS, SUBJECT TO LEGAL INTERPRETATION, IDENTIFY | | | THE FOLLOWING: | | | A. CONSTRUCTION OF FOR-SALE RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM | | | UNITS ON ALL FLOORS ABOVE THE GROUND FLOOR OF THE | | | PROJECT. | | | B. ANY BUILDING CONSTRUCTED ON THE PROPERTY SHALL | | | CONTAIN A FULL SERVICE PHARMACY ON THE GROUND FLOOR NO | | | LESS THAN 1500 GROSS SF IN SIZE FOR A TERM OF 3 YEARS. | | | C. DEVELOPER SHALL CONSTRUCT 100 PUBLIC PARKING SPACES | | | TO BE LOCATED ON LOWER 2 FLOORS OF PROJECT, SEPARATED | | | FROM THE PARKING SERVING OTHER ELEMENTS OF THE PROJECT | | | PLEASE ADDRESS THE INTENT OF THE APPLICANT IN REGARDS | | | TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE RESTRICTIVE COVENANT AND | | | DEVELOPER AGREEMENT IN THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT UPON | | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | 2. ONGOING. THE PROJECT SHALL OBTAIN DAC APPROVAL OF A | | | CLASS B LICENSE FOR A TYPE III GROUP HOMES . | | | 3. ONGOING. FOR GROUP HOMES PERMITTED AS A CLASS B | | | SPECIAL USE, A GROUP HOME FACILITY SHALL BE LOCATED A | | | MINIMUM OF 1,200 FEET FROM ANOTHER SUCH FACILITY. A | | | VARIANCE FROM THIS PROVISION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS | | | LOCATION. PLEASE PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION FROM VARIANCE IN | | | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. | | | 4. ONGOING. PER SECTION 94-54(A)(3), FORMAL SITE PLAN | | | APPROVALS INVOLVING THE TDR PROGRAM SHALL BE APPROVED | | | BY DAC AND THE CERTIFICATE OF TRANSFER SHALL BE | | | OBTAINED PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF THE SITE PLAN | | | APPROVAL. | | | 5. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE THE AMOUNT OF TDRS | | | NEEDED FOR THE SITE (SQUARE FEET) AND THE AMOUNT OF SF | | | GRANTED BY RIGHT IN THE PROJECT DATA TABLE. | | | CANNOT LOCATE BREAKDOWN OF SF IN PROJECT DATA TABLE. | | | PLEASE INCLUDE SPECIFIC SF BY RIGHT, AND SF REQUESTED | | | BY TDRS. | | | 6. ONGOING. PROJECT SHALL REQUIRE DAC SPECIAL REVIEW | | | AND VARIANCE REVIEW. WITH SUBMITTAL FOR VARIANCE | | | REVIEW, PLEASE RESPOND TO THE CRITERIA FOR VARIANCE | | | REQUESTS FOR EACH REQUESTED VARIANCE, SEPARATELY, AS | | | ESTABLISHED IN SECTION 94-38(D)(6). | | | 7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE ILLUSTRATE ADJACENT | | | BUILDING FRONTAGES AND CURB LINES ACROSS DIXIE HIGHWAY, | | | DATURA STREET AND THE ALLEYWAY. | | | 8. SATISFIED. | | | 9. ONGOING. IF VALET IS PROPOSING UTILIZING EXISTING OR | | | PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING FOR VALET, THE APPLICANT | | | SHALL PAY FOR THE USE OF THOSE OCCUPIED SPACES IN | | | AMOUNT AS ESTABLISHED BY THE CITY AND IN LOCATIONS | | | APPROVED BY THE CITY PARKING ADMINISTRATOR. THIS WOULD | | | UTILIZE EXISTING ON-STREET PARKING SPACES AND NOT | | | INTERFERE WITH SIDEWALK CONNECTIVITY. | | | 10. ONGOING. SUBJECT TO FURTHER COMMENT. EFFORTS FOR | | | ALLEY AND STREETSCAPE SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH CITY | | | ENGINEERS. | | | 11. SATISFIED. | | | 12. SATISFIED. | | | 13. ONGOING. STAFF CAN HELP COORDINATE WITH PALM TRAN. | | | 14. SATISFIED. | | | 15. SATISFIED. | | | 16. SATISFIED. | | | 17. SATISFIED. | | | 18. NOT SATISFIED. STAFF HAS CONCERN WITH THE SETBACK | | | OF THE GROUND FLOOR USES ON THE WEST SIDE OF DATURA | | | STREET, AS IT DOES NOT PROVIDE FOR ACTIVATED PEDESTRIAN | | | SPACE AND INTERACTION WITH THE STREET AS OTHER | | | RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS DO WITHIN THE DMP AREA. | | | PLEASE SEE NEW COMMENT # 55 | | | 19. ONGOING. IN ORDER TO COUNT TANDEM PARKING SPACES AS | | | TWO SPACES, A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT SHALL BE REQUIRED | | | FOR CONFIRMATION OF A VALET ATTENDANT IN CHARGE OF THE | | | OPERATION OF THE PARKING FACILITY DURING ALL OPERATING | | | HOURS. | | | 20. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE NOTE, THE PARKING | | | REQUIRED FOR THE INDEPENDENT LIVING UNITS MUST MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL USES WITHIN THE DMP WHICH | | | IS MINIMUM 1 PER UNIT PLUS 1 PER 20 UNITS FOR GUEST | | | PARKING, MAXIMUM 2 PER UNIT PLUS 1 PER 20 UNITS FOR | | | GUEST PARKING. PLEASE SEPARATE PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR | | | INDEPENDENT LIVING FROM ASSISTED LIVING AND MEMORY CARE | | | AND DETERMINE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES REQUESTED FOR | | | THE WAIVER. THE WAIVER CANNOT EXCEED 50% OF THE | | | REQUIRED PARKING FOR THE PROJECT. | | | PLEASE SEE NEW COMMENT #70. DEPENDING ON AMOUNT OF | | | PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, ONLY ONE VARIANCE FOR PARKING | | | MAY BE REQUIRRED, TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF VARIANCES | | | REQUESTED. THE CURRENT PROVIDED PARKING SPACES (TOTAL, | | | INCLUDING ON-STREET SPACES) WOULD NOT REQUIRE BOTH | | | VARIANCES. | | | 21. ONGOING. PER SECTION 94-481(F): | | | A. TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR THE SENIOR HOUSING PARKING | | | WAIVER, CRITERIA MUST BE MET. PLEASE RESPOND TO THE | | | CRITERIA. | | | B. IF THE PARKING WAIVER IS GRANTED, A RESTRICTIVE | | | COVENANT RESTRICTING THE USE OF THE PROPERTY TO SERVING | | | PERSONS WHO ARE 55 YEARS AND OLDER FOR A PERIOD OF NOT | | | LESS THAN 15 YEARS SHALL BE EXECUTED AND RECORDED. | | | 22. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE SUBMIT PLANS | | | ILLUSTRATING THE TRANSPARENCY REQUIREMENTS PER TABLE | | | IV-50: BUILDING REQUIREMENTS- CWD 10-12 STORY RECEIVING | | | SITES (SECTION 94-134). | | | PLEASE ADDRESS TRANSPARENCY ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY. | | | 23. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE DATA ON | | | BUILDING FOOTPRINT MAXIMUM IN SITE TABLE PER TABLE | | | IV-50. | | | THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM ON LEVEL | | | FOUR. | | | 24. ONGOING. THE PROJECT DOES NOT MEET ACTIVE USE LINER | | | REQUIREMENTS ALONG QUADRILLE BOULEVARD AND DATURA | | | STREET. PLEASE ADDRESS VARIANCE CRITERIA IN THE | | | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. | | | 25. SATISFIED. | | | 26. ONGOING. THE SUBMITTED JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT | | | STATES THAT THE PROPOSED PLAN ADHERES TO ALL SETBACK | | | REQUIREMENTS; HOWEVER THE REQUIRED PARKING SETBACK FOR | | | 2 AND 3 STORY ALONG DATURA STREET IS NOT MET. PLEASE | | | ADJUST TO MEET SETBACK REQUIREMENT. | | | 27. SATISFIED. | | | 28. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE ALONG | | | QUADRILLE BOULEVARD DOES NOT MEET THE DEFINITION OR | | | INTENT OF PRIVATE OPEN SPACE. SEE LANDSCAPE COMMENTS. | | | 29. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PRESERVE THE EXISTING CEMENT | | | CANOPY ON SITE, PER CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNER. | | | THIS COULD BE MAINTAINED WITHIN THE OPEN SPACE. | | | TO BE DISCUSSED INTERNALLY WITH HISTORIC PRESERVATION | | | PLANNER. CONVERSATION ONGOING. | | | 30. NOT SATISFIED. THE PROPOSED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE ALONG | | | DATURA STREET CANNOT COUNT AS PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, PER | | | THE DEFINITION OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. STAFF RECOMMENDS | | | UTILIZING SOME SPACE ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY. | | | SEE NEW COMMENT #60 AND LANDSCAPE COMMENTS. | | | 31. SATISFIED. | | | 32. SATISFIED. | | | 33. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL | | | DETAIL OF ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT MATERIALS ON BUILDING | | | ON ELEVATION PLANS. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DETAIL OF ALLEY GARAGE | | | SCREENING MATERIAL. SEE NEW COMMENT #66 | | | 34. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. LANDSCAPE BEDS CAN BE | | | ENLARGED. SEE LANDSCAPE COMMENTS. | | | 35. SATISFIED. | | | 36. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE CHECK CRITERIA FOR FDOT | | | SIGHT TRIANGLE FOR PROPOSED TREES AT STREET CORNERS. | | | PLEASE CHECK CORNER OF QUADRILLE AND DATURA. SEE | | | LANDSCAPE COMMENTS. | | | 37. SATISFIED. | | | 38. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A HARDSCAPE PLAN WITH | | | DETAILS OF PAVERS, SEATING, ETC. | | | HARDSCAPE DETAILS ARE NEEDED FOR REVIEW OF PAVERS, | | | SEATING, LANDSCAPE BED AREAS (ALONG DATURA STREET | | | APPEARS TO HAVE BENCHES AROUND LANDSCAPE AREA), ETC. | | | 39. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SEE TABLE IV-7 FOR OPEN SPACE | | | STANDARDS. CURRENTLY THE PASSAGEWAY PUBLIC OPEN TYPE IS | | | REQUIRED. STAFF IS CURRENTLY REVIEWING THIS REQUIREMENT | | | FOR APPLICABILITY FOR THIS SITE. | | | TABLE IV-7 WILL BE UPDATED AFTER THE SECOND COMMISSION | | | READING ON SEPTEBMER 9, 2019. PLEASE CONTACT STAFF FOR | | | UPDATED TABLE, WHICH PERMITS ADDITIONAL TYPES OF OPEN | | | SPACE IN CWD-CD AT DISCRETION OF P&Z. EXACT TYPE OF | | | OPEN SPACE NEEDS TO BE CALLED OUT. SEE LANDSCAPE | | | COMMENTS. | | | 40. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE ADDRESS SPECIFIC PRIVATE AND | | | PUBLIC OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS PER TABLE IV-6 AND TABLE | | | IV-7, INCLUDING TYPE OF OPEN SPACE (COURTYARD GARDEN, | | | TERRACE, ETC.) FOR EACH OPEN SPACE AND SEE THE | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR VEGETATED SPACE, SEATING, ETC. | | | SEE LANDSCAPE COMMENTS. | | | 41. SATISFIED. | | | 42. ONGOING. PER SECTION 94-111: PARKING AND LOADING | | | REQUIREMENTS, A MINIMUM THREE FOOT BACK UP AREA SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED AT THE TERMINUS OF ANY DEAD-END DRIVE | | | AISLE, SHALL BE RESTRIPED AS DEDICATED PULL-IN AREA FOR | | | TURNING AROUND. | | | SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW BY CITY ENGINEER AS PRESENTED | | | TURNAROUND IS NOT THE TYPICAL FOR CODE REQUIREMENTS. | | | 43. SATISFIED. | | | 44. ONGOING. PER SECTION 94-111, ONE BICYCLE PARKING | | | SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED PER EVERY 15 REQUIRED PARKING | | | SPACES, IN A SECURE AREA, COVERED FROM THE ELEMENTS. | | | PLEASE ADJUST WITH UPDATED REQUIRED PARKING NUMBER. SEE | | | NEW COMMENT 70 | | | 45. NOT SATISFIED. PER SECTION 93-113, BICYCLE PARKING | | | FOR THE PUBLIC SHALL BE PROVIDED AT A MINIMUM OF ONE | | | SPACE PER EVERY 100 FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE. THE POST | | | AND LOOP RACK IS RECOMMENDED FOR THE PUBLIC ROW. PLEASE | | | INDICATE EXACT BICYCLE RACK DETAIL ON PLANS. | | | ONE ADDITIONAL SPACE REQUIRED. PLEASE SHIFT BICYCLE | | | RACKS TO ALLOW FOR THREE FEET FROM THE POST TO THE EDGE | | | OF PAVER AREA. | | | 46. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS | | | OF BICYCLE RACKS ON THE SITE PLAN. THE POLE SHALL BE NO | | | FURTHER THAN THREE FEET FROM THE EDGE OF CURB | | | MAINTAINING A MINIMUM FIVE FOOT CLEARANCE FOR | | | PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION. | | | THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BICYCLE RACK DETAILS ON | | | CIVIL PLANS AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. PLEASE COORDINATE. | | | 47. ONGOING. PLEASE INDICATE LOCATION OF PROPOSED | | | UTILITIES INCLUDING THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER, FDC | | | CONNECTION, FPL TRANSFORMER, ETC. STAFF RECOMMENDS | | | LOCATING THE UTILITIES WITHIN THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT | | | AND PROVIDING ACCESS TO UTILITY COMPANIES, TO KEEP OFF | | | THE PUBLIC ROW. ALTERNATIVELY, UTILITIES CAN BE LOCATED | | | ALONG THE ALLEY SIDE OF THE BUILDING. SUFFICIENT | | | LANDSCAPE SCREENING IS REQUIRED WHEN UTILITIES ARE | | | LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING AND WITHIN THE ROW. A | | | MINIMUM OF 5 FOOT SIDEWALK CLEARANCE MUST BE MAINTAINED | | | AT ALL LOCATIONS. | | | PLEASE UTILIZE WALLMOUNTED FDC SUBJECT TO FD | | | REQUIREMENTS. PLACEMENT OF UTILITIES SHALL BE ONGOING | | | THROUGH PLANNING AND PERMIT PROCESS, SUBJECT TO REVIEW | | | BY ZONING, LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTS. | | | 48. SATISFIED. | | | 49. NOT SATISFIED. THE MINIMUM FOOTCANDLE, AS MEASURED | | | AT THE BACK EDGE OF THE CURB AND ONE FOOT ABOVE THE | | | SIDEWALK IS 0.6 AND THE MAXIMUM IS 1.0 FOOTCANDLE. | | | PLEASE ADJUST PHOTOMETRICS EXTENDING TO THE ROADWAY | | | CENTERLINES AND PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE PROPOSED LIGHT | | | FIXTURES AS NECESSARY. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH THE | | | ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT TO USE THE CITY APPROVED LIGHT | | | FIXTURE. A SPECIFIC FIXTURE IS REQUIRED FOR ALL ROW. | | | NO PHOTOMETRIC PLANS SUBMITTED. | | | 50. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE PROPOSED PHOTOMETRICS | | | FOR THE PARKING GARAGE, MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | SECTION 86-294. | | | NO PHOTOMETRIC PLANS SUBMITTED. | | | 51. SATISFIED. | | | 52. ONGOING. APPLICANT SHALL BE REQUIRED TO MEET | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. CONTACT SYBILLE | | | WELTER AT [email protected] FOR MORE INFORMATION. | | | 53. SATISFIED. | | | | | | NEW COMMENTS SEPTEMBER 9, 2019: | | | 54. PLEASE UPDATE THE CONTEXTUAL MAP AND BUILDING | | | MASSING EXHIBIT WITH BROADSTONE BUILDING. | | | 55. STAFF HAS CONCERN WITH ONLY ONE ENTRANCE ALONG | | | DATURA STREET AND NO OPENINGS ALONG QUADRILLE BOULEVARD | | | AS THIS DOES NOT MEET THE INTENT AND DEFINITION OF | | | ACTIVE USE. BASED ON PREVIOUS DISCUSSION, THE | | | UTILIZATION OF THE SPACES FOR RETAIL/SERVICES OPEN TO | | | THE GENERAL PUBLIC WERE BEING CONSIDERED. WITHOUT | | | PUBLIC ACCESS, STAFF HAS CONCERN WITH THE RELATIONSHIP | | | OF THE BUILDING TO THE PUBLIC STREET. | | | 56. PLEASE CONSIDER THE HEIGHT OF THE COMPACTOR ROOM | | | FOR THE RESIDENTIAL USE. STAFF WILL DISCUSS WITH PUBLIC | | | WORKS TO ENSURE THE CORRECT HEIGHT IS USED. | | | 57. PLEASE PROVIDE BUILDING SECTIONS WITH RESUBMITTAL. | | | 58. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE OPEN FLOOR PARKING GARAGE ON THE | | | 4TH FLOOR. IN LIGHT OF THE RESTRICTIVE COVENANT FOR 50 | | | PUBLIC PARKING SPACES, THIS SPACE COULD BE UTILIZED FOR | | | ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES. | | | 59. THE COVERED TERRACE ALONG DATURA STREET CANNOT BE | | | COUNTED TOWARDS PRIVATE OPEN SPACE PER PRIVATE OPEN | | | SPACE DEFINITION. | | | 60. EXCEEDING THE MAXIMUM SETBACK ALONG DIXIE STREET | | | CAN ONLY BE PERMITTED IF THE OPEN SPACE IS PUBLIC OPEN | | | SPACE, NOT PRIVATE. | | | 61. PLEASE CONSIDER WINDOWS OR ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT | | | FOR THE ACTIVE USE AT THE CORNER OF DIXIE HIGHWAY AND | | | DATURA STREET. | | | 62. PLEASE PROVIDE THE SETBACK FROM THE ALLEY TO THE | | | PORCH RAILINGS ON THE UPPER LEVELS. | | | 63. STAFF HAS CONCERN WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT | | | OF THE ALLEY PARKING GARAGE LEVELS, ESPECIALLY ABOVE | | | THE SECOND FLOOR. THE ADJACENT STRUCTURE IS ONLY TWO | | | STORIES AND THE LEVELS ABOVE WOULD BE VERY VISIBLE FROM | | | THE PUBLIC ROW. | | | 64. THE STORAGE AREA ALONG DATURA STREET CANNOT BE | | | COUNTED FOR ACTIVE USE. PLEASE AMEND ACTIVE USE | | | CALCULATIONS. | | | 65. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THE NORTHERN EDGE OF THE | | | STRUCTURE ALONG QUADRILLE BOULEVARD IS OPEN AIR | | | 66. PLEASE UPDATE THE ELEVATIONS TO INCLUDE LANDSCAPE | | | PLANS. PLEASE INCLUDE ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL MATERIAL | | | LABELS INCLUDING GLASS, FAUX GLASS, STUCCO, ETC. | | | 67. PLEASE INCLUDE BUMPER STOPS FOR THE FIVE PARKING | | | SPOTS ALONG THE ALLEY. | | | 68. PLEASE ADJUST THE SETBACK MEASUREMENT AT ALL | | | LOCATIONS TO BE FROM THE BACK OF CURB, NOT FRONT (SEE | | | DATURA MEASUREMENT) AND MEASURE TO FURTHER PROJECTION. | | | 69. THE PARKING DATA APPEARS TO BE INCORRECT AS IT IS | | | BASED ON 58 BEDS, RATHER THAN 56 AS MENTIONED IN THE | | | SITE DATA. PLEASE ADJUST AS NECESSARY. | | | 70. BASED ON THE CURRENT PROVIDED PARKING, ONLY ONE | | | VARIANCE MAY BE REQUIRED (FROM EITHER SENIOR LIVING, OR | | | ASSISTED LIVING). PLEASE ADJUST AS NECESSARY, | | | COORDINATING WITH NEW COMMENT 58. | | | 71. PLEASE CLARIFY THE 2,021 SF OF OFFICE SPACE, AS | | | COUNTED IN THE PARKING DATA TABLE. | | | 72. THE FAR CALCULATIONS WOULD INCLUDE THE STAIRWELL | | | ALONG QUADRILLE BOULEVARD AS THE STAIRWELL CONNECTS TO | | | THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING. SEE DEFINITION OF GROSS SF IN | | | SECTION 94-109. | | | 73. PLEASE NOTE, IF THE GARAGE STORAGE IS NOT COUNTED | | | TOWARDS FAR, THESE AREAS CANNOT BE UNDER AC AND CAN | | | NEVER BE UNDER AC UNLESS THE FAR IS NOT EXCEEDED. IF | | | NOT UNDER AC, PLEASE MAKE NOTES ON ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. | | | 74. IT APPEARS THAT THE STAIRWELL ON QUADRILLE | | | BOULEVARD MAY SHIFT AS IT CONNECTS TO THE RESIDENTIAL | | | PORTION ON LEVEL 6. PLEASE ADJUST FAR DIAGRAM AS | | | NECESSARY. IT MAY BE THAT A SEPARATE FAR DIAGRAM FOR | | | LEVEL 6 IS REQUIRED IF DIFFERENT FROM LEVEL 7 AND 8. | | | 75. PLEASE AMEND THE MASSING STUDY WITH THE UPDATED | | | ELEVATION AND INCLUDE THE ADJACENT BROADSTONE BUILDING. | | | 76. A STRIP OF PAVERS THAT APPEARS ON THE ARCHITECTURAL | | | PLANS DOES NOT APPEAR ON THE CIVIL PLANS. WHAT IS THE | | | PURPOSE OF THIS STRIP? PLEASE COORDINATE PLANS. | | | 77. PLEASE INCLUDE ADA PARKING SPACES. SEE BUILDING | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | LIZ LEVESQUE, URBAN DESIGN PLANNER | | | [email protected] | | | 561 822 1426 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-10-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
elevesqu |
Date |
06-10-2019 |
Time |
17:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
elevesqu |
Date |
06-10-2019 |
Time |
17:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-06-12 08:37:08 | 1. THE PROJECT CANNOT PROCEED TO DOWNTOWN ACTION | | | COMMITTEE UNTIL THE DETAILS OF THE RESTRICTIVE COVENANT | | | AND AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (JULY 19, | | | 2004) ARE RESOLVED. PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF THE | | | DOCUMENTS, SUBJECT TO LEGAL INTERPRETATION, IDENTIFY | | | THE FOLLOWING: | | | A. CONSTRUCTION OF FOR-SALE RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM | | | UNITS ON ALL FLOORS ABOVE THE GROUND FLOOR OF THE | | | PROJECT. | | | B. ANY BUILDING CONSTRUCTED ON THE PROPERTY SHALL | | | CONTAIN A FULL SERVICE PHARMACY ON THE GROUND FLOOR NO | | | LESS THAN 1500 GROSS SF IN SIZE FOR A TERM OF 3 YEARS. | | | C. DEVELOPER SHALL CONSTRUCT 100 PUBLIC PARKING SPACES | | | TO BE LOCATED ON LOWER 2 FLOORS OF PROJECT, SEPARATED | | | FROM THE PARKING SERVING OTHER ELEMENTS OF THE PROJECT | | | PLEASE ADDRESS THE INTENT OF THE APPLICANT IN REGARDS | | | TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE RESTRICTIVE COVENANT AND | | | DEVELOPER AGREEMENT IN THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT UPON | | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | 2. THE PROJECT SHALL OBTAIN DAC APPROVAL OF A CLASS B | | | LICENSE FOR A TYPE III GROUP HOMES . | | | 3. FOR GROUP HOMES PERMITTED AS A CLASS B SPECIAL USE, | | | A GROUP HOME FACILITY SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF | | | 1,200 FEET FROM ANOTHER SUCH FACILITY. A VARIANCE FROM | | | THIS PROVISION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS LOCATION. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION FROM VARIANCE IN | | | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. | | | 4. PER SECTION 94-54(A)(3), FORMAL SITE PLAN APPROVALS | | | INVOLVING THE TDR PROGRAM SHALL BE APPROVED BY DAC AND | | | THE CERTIFICATE OF TRANSFER SHALL BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO | | | THE EXPIRATION OF THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL. | | | 5. PLEASE INCLUDE THE AMOUNT OF TDRS NEEDED FOR THE | | | SITE (SQUARE FEET) AND THE AMOUNT OF SF GRANTED BY | | | RIGHT IN THE PROJECT DATA TABLE. | | | 6. PROJECT SHALL REQUIRE DAC SPECIAL REVIEW AND | | | VARIANCE REVIEW. WITH SUBMITTAL FOR VARIANCE REVIEW, | | | PLEASE RESPOND TO THE CRITERIA FOR VARIANCE REQUESTS | | | FOR EACH REQUESTED VARIANCE, SEPARATELY, AS ESTABLISHED | | | IN SECTION 94-38(D)(6). | | | 7. PLEASE CONDENSE THE TWO SEPARATE SITE PLANS SHEET | | | SP-1 AND SP.1 INTO ONE SITE PLAN. PLEASE SHOW GROUND | | | FLOOR USES, WITH THE OUTLINE OF UPPER LEVELS, SETBACK | | | DIMENSIONS, EXISTING CURB LINE, ALL APPLICABLE | | | DIMENSIONS, AND OTHER REQUIRED INFORMATION. PLEASE | | | ILLUSTRATE ADJACENT BUILDING FRONTAGES AND CURB LINES | | | ACROSS DIXIE HIGHWAY, DATURA STREET AND THE ALLEYWAY. | | | 8. THE PROPOSED DROP-OFF DOES NOT MEET THE FOLLOWING | | | REQUIREMENTS: | | | A. DESIGNATED PASSENGER LOADING AND DROP-OFF AREAS | | | SHALL OCCUR WITHIN THE FOOTPRINT OF THE BUILDING | | | ENVELOPE AND SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY | | | TRAFFIC ENGINEER. | | | B. CURB CUTS FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS SHALL BE NO MORE | | | THAN 25 FEET, MEASURED AT THE CURB LINE. | | | C. CAR QUEUING SHALL OCCUR INTERNAL TO THE LOT AND | | | SHALL NOT INTERFERE WITH PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION ON A | | | PUBLIC SIDEWALK. THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE DROP OFF | | | INTERFERES WITH PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION. | | | D. FOR REFERENCE, ?TYPE A? PORTE COCHERES SHALL BE | | | ALLOWED FOR HOTELS IN THIS DISTRICT. | | | STAFF RECOMMENDS CONSIDERING UTILIZING THE EXISTING | | | GARAGE ENTRANCE OFF OF THE ALLEYWAY FOR COVERED DROP | | | OFF. | | | 9. IF VALET IS PROPOSING UTILIZING EXISTING OR PROPOSED | | | ON-STREET PARKING FOR VALET, THE APPLICANT SHALL PAY | | | FOR THE USE OF THOSE OCCUPIED SPACES IN AMOUNT AS | | | ESTABLISHED BY THE CITY AND IN LOCATIONS APPROVED BY | | | THE CITY PARKING ADMINISTRATOR. THIS WOULD UTILIZE | | | EXISTING ON-STREET PARKING SPACES AND NOT INTERFERE | | | WITH SIDEWALK CONNECTIVITY. | | | 10. PLEASE INDICATE THE PROPOSED DIRECTION OF THE | | | ALLEY. MANY BUSINESSES ON CLEMATIS STREET USE THIS | | | ALLEY FOR PARKING AND GARBAGE COLLECTION, WHICH WILL BE | | | CONSIDERED IN THE DESIGN INTENT. | | | 11. THE APPLICANT SHALL WORK WITH PUBLIC WORKS | | | REGARDING THE EXISTING DUMPSTER THAT IS LOCATED WITHIN | | | THE PROPERTY AND USED BY BUSINESSES ON THE 400 BLOCK OF | | | CLEMATIS STREET. | | | 12. PLEASE PROVIDE TURN MOVEMENTS FOR ENTERING AND | | | EXITING THE PARKING GARAGE TO ENSURE THE TURNS CAN WORK | | | SAFELY. | | | 13. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT PALM TRAN FOR PROPOSAL TO | | | REMOVE/RELOCATE OF BUS SHELTER. STAFF RECOMMENDS THE | | | USE OF THE EXISTING SHELTER LOCATED SOUTH OF THE | | | PROPERTY AT 499 EVERNIA STREET (BROADSTONE). IF PALM | | | TRAN DOES NOT PERMIT RELOCATION OF BUS STOP TO THIS | | | LOCATION, THE APPLICANT SHALL REPLACE WITH A NEW BUS | | | SHELTER, MEETING PALM TRAN STANDARDS. | | | 14. APPLICANT SHALL REQUIRE FDOT APPROVAL FOR ANY WORK | | | DONE ON QUADRILLE BOULEVARD. | | | 15. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH THE CITY ENGINEERING | | | DEPARTMENT ON THE PROPOSED DATURA STREET REDESIGN THAT | | | IS CURRENTLY IN INITIAL DESIGN PHASE. | | | 16. THE PROPOSED UNDER COVER AREA ON THE GROUND FLOOR | | | DOES NOT MEET THE DEFINITION OF COLONNADE FOR THE DMP | | | AREA AND DOES NOT FIT INTO THE CONTEXT OF THE DIRECT | | | AREA. STAFF RECOMMENDS ELIMINATION OF THE COLONNADE AS | | | IT DOES NOT ACTIVATE THE PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT AND | | | DOES NOT IMPROVE ACTIVE USE OR TRANSPARENCY ALONG THE | | | SIDEWALK. | | | 17. ARE ALL USES ON THE GROUND FLOOR PRIVATE? PLEASE | | | CLARIFY WHICH USES ARE OPEN TO PUBLIC, IF ANY OR | | | ACCESSIBLE FROM THE STREET. | | | 18. STAFF HAS CONCERN WITH THE SETBACK OF THE GROUND | | | FLOOR USES ON THE WEST SIDE OF DATURA STREET, AS IT | | | DOES NOT PROVIDE FOR ACTIVATED PEDESTRIAN SPACE AND | | | INTERACTION WITH THE STREET AS OTHER RESIDENTIAL | | | BUILDINGS DO WITHIN THE DMP AREA. | | | 19. IN ORDER TO COUNT TANDEM PARKING SPACES AS TWO | | | SPACES, A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR | | | CONFIRMATION OF A VALET ATTENDANT IN CHARGE OF THE | | | OPERATION OF THE PARKING FACILITY DURING ALL OPERATING | | | HOURS. | | | 20. PLEASE NOTE, THE PARKING REQUIRED FOR THE | | | INDEPENDENT LIVING UNITS MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR | | | RESIDENTIAL USES WITHIN THE DMP WHICH IS MINIMUM 1 PER | | | UNIT PLUS 1 PER 20 UNITS FOR GUEST PARKING, MAXIMUM 2 | | | PER UNIT PLUS 1 PER 20 UNITS FOR GUEST PARKING. PLEASE | | | SEPARATE PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING | | | FROM ASSISTED LIVING AND MEMORY CARE AND DETERMINE | | | NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES REQUESTED FOR THE WAIVER. THE | | | WAIVER CANNOT EXCEED 50% OF THE REQUIRED PARKING FOR | | | THE PROJECT. | | | 21. PER SECTION 94-481(F): | | | A. TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR THE SENIOR HOUSING PARKING | | | WAIVER, CRITERIA MUST BE MET. PLEASE RESPOND TO THE | | | CRITERIA. | | | B. IF THE PARKING WAIVER IS GRANTED, A RESTRICTIVE | | | COVENANT RESTRICTING THE USE OF THE PROPERTY TO SERVING | | | PERSONS WHO ARE 55 YEARS AND OLDER FOR A PERIOD OF NOT | | | LESS THAN 15 YEARS SHALL BE EXECUTED AND RECORDED. | | | 22. PLEASE SUBMIT PLANS ILLUSTRATING THE TRANSPARENCY | | | REQUIREMENTS PER TABLE IV-50: BUILDING REQUIREMENTS- | | | CWD 10-12 STORY RECEIVING SITES (SECTION 94-134). | | | 23. PLEASE PROVIDE DATA ON BUILDING FOOTPRINT MAXIMUM | | | IN SITE TABLE PER TABLE IV-50. | | | 24. THE PROJECT DOES NOT MEET ACTIVE USE LINER | | | REQUIREMENTS ALONG QUADRILLE BOULEVARD AND DATURA | | | STREET. PLEASE ADDRESS VARIANCE CRITERIA IN THE | | | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. | | | 25. CONSIDERING THE PROPOSED VARIANCES, PLEASE EVALUATE | | | THE USE OF ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL MATERIALS, CONSIDER | | | THE PROPORTIONS OF THE BUILDING, ESPECIALLY REFINING | | | THE PARKING GARAGE DESIGN. PLEASE TAKE INTO | | | CONSIDERATION THE REDESIGN BASED ON REMOVAL OF THE | | | ARCADE PORTIONS (SEE COMMENT #16). | | | 26. THE SUBMITTED JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT STATES THAT | | | THE PROPOSED PLAN ADHERES TO ALL SETBACK REQUIREMENTS; | | | HOWEVER THE REQUIRED PARKING SETBACK FOR 2 AND 3 STORY | | | ALONG DATURA STREET IS NOT MET. PLEASE ADJUST TO MEET | | | SETBACK REQUIREMENT. | | | 27. FOR SETBACK MEASUREMENTS, WHERE A CURB LOCATION | | | VARIES ALONG A PROPERTY, THE BACK OF CURB SHALL BE | | | DEFINED AS THE PREDOMINANT BACK OF CURB LINE FURTHEST | | | FROM THE CENTER LINE OF THE ROAD. PLEASE ADJUST SETBACK | | | MEASUREMENTS ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY TO REFLECT THIS. | | | 28. THE PROPOSED PRIVATE OPEN SPACE USE ALONG QUADRILLE | | | BOULEVARD IS NOT AN EFFECTIVE USE OF OPEN SPACE. STAFF | | | RECOMMENDS SHIFTING THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT TO THE WEST | | | TO BETTER ALIGN WITH THE FOOTPRINT OF THE ADJACENT | | | BROADSTONE BUILDING AND UTILIZE MORE OPEN SPACE ALONG | | | DIXIE HIGHWAY, TO INCREASE PEDESTRIAN ACTIVE SPACE. | | | 29. PLEASE PRESERVE THE EXISTING CEMENT CANOPY ON SITE, | | | PER CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNER. THIS COULD BE | | | MAINTAINED WITHIN THE OPEN SPACE. | | | 30. THE PROPOSED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE ALONG DATURA STREET | | | CANNOT COUNT AS PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, PER THE DEFINITION | | | OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. STAFF RECOMMENDS UTILIZING SOME | | | SPACE ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY. | | | 31. THE PROPOSED CANOPY EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL | | | PROJECTION FOR CANOPIES. PER SECTION TABLE IV-5, THE | | | MAXIMUM PROJECTION FOR CANOPIES IS 20 FEET WITH A 12 | | | FOOT MAXIMUM ENCROACHMENT INTO THE ROW. PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE PROPOSED HEIGHT OF THE CANOPY, THE MINIMUM HEIGHT | | | FROM SIDEWALK GRADE IS 10 FEET. | | | 32. THE QUADRILLE BOULEVARD ELEVATION DOES NOT | | | ILLUSTRATE THE EXTENT OF THE PROPOSED CANOPY. PLEASE | | | ADD TO SHOW ADJUSTED CANOPY SIZE PER COMMENT #31. | | | 33. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DETAIL OF ARCHITECTURAL | | | TREATMENT MATERIALS ON BUILDING ON ELEVATION PLANS. | | | 34. TREE GRATES ARE NOT NECESSARY WHERE THERE IS | | | SUFFICIENT SIDEWALK WIDTH ADJACENT TO THE PROPOSED | | | TREE. PLEASE REMOVE TREE GRATES AND USE PLANTING BEDS | | | (CONSIDER 6X4 BEDS) WHERE GRATES ARE PROPOSED. | | | 35. PLEASE PROVIDE OAK TREES OR SIMILAR SHADE TREES AT | | | CORNER OF QUADRILLE AND DATURA AND DIXIE AND DATURA AS | | | THIS IS WHERE PEDESTRIANS WAIT FOR STREET CROSSINGS. | | | 36. PLEASE CHECK CRITERIA FOR FDOT SIGHT TRIANGLE FOR | | | PROPOSED TREES AT STREET CORNERS. | | | 37. THE PROPOSED EXFILTRATION TRENCH RUNS WHERE TREES | | | ARE PROPOSED. PLEASE REVIEW AND ADJUST AS NECESSARY. | | | 38. PLEASE PROVIDE A HARDSCAPE PLAN WITH DETAILS OF | | | PAVERS, SEATING, ETC. | | | 39. PLEASE SEE TABLE IV-7 FOR OPEN SPACE STANDARDS. | | | CURRENTLY THE PASSAGEWAY PUBLIC OPEN TYPEIS REQUIRED. | | | STAFF IS CURRENTLY REVIEWING THIS REQUIREMENT FOR | | | APPLICABILITY FOR THIS SITE. | | | 40. PLEASE ADDRESS SPECIFIC PRIVATE AND PUBLIC OPEN | | | SPACE REQUIREMENTS PER TABLE IV-6 AND TABLE IV-7, | | | INCLUDING TYPE OF OPEN SPACE (COURTYARD GARDEN, | | | TERRACE, ETC.) FOR EACH OPEN SPACE AND SEE THE | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR VEGETATED SPACE, SEATING, ETC. | | | 41. PLEASE PROVIDE ILLUSTRATIONS SHOWING PLANAR BREAK | | | REQUIREMENTS AS REQUIRED BY TABLE IV-4: FA?ADE | | | ARTICULATION REQUIREMENTS. | | | 42. PER SECTION 94-111: PARKING AND LOADING | | | REQUIREMENTS, A MINIMUM THREE-FOOT BACK UP AREA SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED AT THE TERMINUS OF ANY DEAD-END DRIVE AISLE | | | TO ALLOW FOR VEHICLES TO SAFELY PULL OUT OF THE END | | | PARKING SPACES. IN ADDITION, THE EQUIVALENT OF ONE | | | PARKING SPACE AT THE TERMINUS OF A DEAD-END AISLE SHALL | | | BE STRIPED AS DEDICATED PULL-IN AREA FOR TURNING | | | AROUND. | | | 43. PLEASE PROVIDE TYPICAL PARKING SPACE AND AISLE | | | WIDTH DIMENSIONS ON EACH FLOOR. PLEASE NOTE, IN THOSE | | | CASES WHERE THE SIDE OF ANY STALL IS ADJACENT TO A WALL | | | OR COLUMN, THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A | | | MINIMUM OF ONE FOOT. WHERE THERE IS AN OBSTRUCTION ON | | | BOTH SIDES OF THE STALL THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE | | | INCREASE BY A MINIMUM OF TWO FEET. PLEASE DIMENSION | | | THIS ADDITIONAL ONE/TWO FOOT. | | | 44. PER SECTION 94-111, ONE BICYCLE PARKING SPACE SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED PER EVERY 15 REQUIRED PARKING SPACES, IN A | | | SECURE AREA, COVERED FROM THE ELEMENTS. | | | 45. PER SECTION 93-113, BICYCLE PARKING FOR THE PUBLIC | | | SHALL BE PROVIDED AT A MINIMUM OF ONE SPACE PER EVERY | | | 100 FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE. THE POST AND LOOP RACK IS | | | RECOMMENDED FOR THE PUBLIC ROW. PLEASE INDICATE EXACT | | | BICYCLE RACK DETAIL ON PLANS. | | | 46. PLEASE INCLUDE SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS OF BICYCLE | | | RACKS ON THE SITE PLAN. THE POLE SHALL BE NO FURTHER | | | THAN THREE FEET FROM THE EDGE OF CURB MAINTAINING A | | | MINIMUM FIVE FOOT CLEARANCE FOR PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION. | | | 47. PLEASE INDICATE LOCATION OF PROPOSED UTILITIES | | | INCLUDING THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER, FDC CONNECTION, FPL | | | TRANSFORMER, ETC. STAFF RECOMMENDS LOCATING THE | | | UTILITIES WITHIN THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT AND PROVIDING | | | ACCESS TO UTILITY COMPANIES, TO KEEP OFF THE PUBLIC | | | ROW. ALTERNATIVELY, UTILITIES CAN BE LOCATED ALONG THE | | | ALLEY SIDE OF THE BUILDING. SUFFICIENT LANDSCAPE | | | SCREENING IS REQUIRED WHEN UTILITIES ARE LOCATED | | | OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING AND WITHIN THE ROW. A MINIMUM | | | OF 5 FOOT SIDEWALK CLEARANCE MUST BE MAINTAINED AT ALL | | | LOCATIONS. | | | 48. THE CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANS SHOW PARKING SPACES | | | THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE ADJUST | | | ACCORDINGLY. | | | 49. THE MINIMUM FOOTCANDLE, AS MEASURED AT THE BACK | | | EDGE OF THE CURB AND ONE FOOT ABOVE THE SIDEWALK IS 0.6 | | | AND THE MAXIMUM IS 1.0 FOOTCANDLE. PLEASE ADJUST | | | PHOTOMETRICS EXTENDING TO THE ROADWAY CENTERLINES AND | | | PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE PROPOSED LIGHT FIXTURES AS | | | NECESSARY. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH THE ENGINEERING | | | DEPARTMENT TO USE THE CITY APPROVED LIGHT FIXTURE. A | | | SPECIFIC FIXTURE IS REQUIRED FOR ALL ROW. | | | 50. PLEASE PROVIDE PROPOSED PHOTOMETRICS FOR THE | | | PARKING GARAGE, MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION | | | 86-294. | | | 51. EACH ENTRANCE SHOULD HAVE ITS OWN ADDRESS WHICH IS | | | USED BY 911 EMERGENCY SERVICES. THE EXISTING PRIMARY | | | ADDRESS WHICH WILL BE RETIRED WHEN THE PROJECT IS | | | COMPLETE. THERE WILL SEPARATE ADDRESSES FOR THE MAIN | | | LOBBY AND FOR THE MEMORY CARE LOBBY. THE OWNER CAN PICK | | | WHICH WILL BE THE PRIMARY ADDRESS SEEN ON PAPA. CONTACT | | | MICHAEL ORIO AT [email protected] WITH ANY QUESTIONS. | | | 52. APPLICANT SHALL BE REQUIRED TO MEET REQUIREMENTS OF | | | ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER AT | | | [email protected] FOR MORE INFORMATION. | | | 53. PLEASE BE ADVISED, APPLICANTS ARE NOW REQUIRED TO | | | PRESENT THEIR CASE TO THE BOARDS INCLUDING DAC AND | | | INCLUDE RESPONSES TO CRITERIA FOR SPECIAL REVIEW, | | | VARIANCES, ETC. STAFF WILL PROVIDE COMMENT FOR ITEMS | | | NOT ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT. PRESENTATIONS ARE TO BE | | | SUBMITTED TO STAFF THE MONDAY PRIOR TO THE DAC MEETING | | | BY MEANS OF ELECTRONIC OR FLASH DRIVE DELIVERY. | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |