Plan Review Details - Project Z19030014
Plan Review Stops For Project Z19030014
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status   Date 12-10-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 12-10-2019 Time 19:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 12-10-2019 Time 19:53 Sent To  
Notes
2019-12-10 19:55:17NO BUILDING DIVISION COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED
 ANNEXATION.
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status P Date 12-05-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By rrossano Date 12-05-2019 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rrossano Date 12-05-2019 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-12-05 12:34:36PASSED WITH PROVISOS:
  
 FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL WILL REQUIRE CALCULATIONS
 OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE
 PROPOSED IMPACTED AREAS.
 WATER AND SEWER TO BE PROVIDED BY PALM BEACH COUNTY.
  
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS.
  
 RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX
 3366, ZIP 33402)
 MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 DIRECT: (561) 494-1098
 FAX: (561) 494-1116 MOBILE: (561) 246-9525
 EMAIL: [email protected]
 WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 12-06-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 12-06-2019 Time 14:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 12-06-2019 Time 14:58 Sent To  
Notes
2019-12-06 14:59:22FIRE HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TWO
 THE PARCELS.
  
 COMMENTS WILL BE RESERVED AND PROVIDED WHEN SPECIFIC
 DEVELOPMENT DOCEMNETS ARE PROVIDED.
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 3 Status P Date 03-25-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 03-25-2020 Time 07:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 03-25-2020 Time 08:08 Sent To  
Notes
2020-03-25 08:08:02THE COMMENTS BELOW ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE MARCH 4,
 2020 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE.
  
 1. PERVIOUS/IMPERVIOUS AREA BREAKDOWN WAS ONLY PROVIDED
 FOR THE 16.28 ACRE PARCEL. THE SURVEY SHOWS DEVELOPMENT
 ON THE PROPOSED PARCEL 2 PARCEL. THE
 PERVIOUS/IMPERVIOUS AREA BREAKDOWN IS NEEDED FOR
 PROPOSED PARCEL 2.
  
 2. IN THE FEBRUARY 7, 2020 LOS ANALYSIS FOR FUTURE LAND
 USE AMENDMENT DOCUMENT BY CAULFIELD & WHEELER, INC.,
 UNDER THE PROPOSED ESTIMATED DRAINAGE FLOWS SECTION, IT
 WAS ASSUMED THE MAXIMUM PERCENT IMPERVIOUS AREA
 COVERAGE WAS 80%. ON THE PERVIOUS/IMPERVIOUS AREA MAP
 FOR PROPOSED PARCEL 1, THE PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA IS
 LISTED AS 2.07 AC FOR THE 16.28 AC PARCEL WHICH
 CALCULATES TO BE 12.7% PERVIOUS. THE IMPERVIOUS AREA
 PERCENTAGE WOULD BE 87.3% WHICH EXCEEDS THE ASSUMPTION
 MADE IN THE DRAINAGE ANALYSIS. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT WILL
 NEED TO MEET IMPERVIOUS/PERVIOUS CRITERIA PER CITY
 CODE.
  
 3. ALLOWABLE DISCHARGE RATES WILL BE ESTABLISHED FOR
 EACH PARCEL BECAUSE THEY ARE SEPARATED BY THE LWDD
 RIGHT OF WAY.
  
 TRACY WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 [email protected]
 561-494-1120
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status P Date 03-06-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 03-06-2020 Time 15:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 03-06-2020 Time 15:14 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status P Date 12-10-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 12-10-2019 Time 14:11 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 12-10-2019 Time 14:12 Sent To  
Notes
2019-12-10 14:11:17ANNEXATION PASSED WITH THE FOLLOWING PROVISOS:
  
 PROVIDE A SIGNED AND SEALED LETTER FROM A PROFESSIONAL
 ENGINEER LISTING THE TOTAL EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA
 (BUILDINGS, SIDEWALKS, PAVEMENT, ETC.) AND TOTAL AREA
 BEING ANNEXED INTO THE CITY.
  
 ON THE SURVEY, SHOW THE CONVERSION EQUATION BETWEEN
 NAVD1988 AND NGVD1929.
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 10-27-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 10-27-2020 Time 09:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-10-27 09:20:07PASSED, BUT NEED SIGNED AND SEALED (OR DIGITALLY) COPY
 OF SURVEY.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 06-26-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 06-26-2020 Time 12:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-06-26 13:07:301. NEED TITLE COMPANY OR ATTORNEY TO ISSUE OPINION AS
 TO TYPE OF OWNERSHIP OF THE EAST 40'.
 2. WITHOUT REVIEWING ALL THE DEEDS, IT APPEARS THAT THE
 LWDD MAY HAVE FEE SIMPLE TITLE ACCORDING TO THE LOT 14
 TITLE DETERMINATION.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-26-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 12-10-2019 Time 07:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2019-12-10 07:40:01PASSED ALSO FOR PB 1824 A AND B.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 01-16-2020 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-01-16 16:26:28TRAFFIC STATEMENT COMMENTS:
 1. PROVIDE THE COUNTY TPS LETTER.
 2. PROVIDE INTERSECTION ANALYSES WITH HIGHWAY CAPACITY
 MANUAL 6TH METHODOLOGY AT THE FOLLOWING INTERSECTIONS.
 PLEASE ONLY INCLUDE COMMITTED IMPROVEMENTS AND PROJECTS
 IN THE 5-YEAR WORK PROGRAM.
 A. OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD/SR 7
 B. OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD/SANSBURYS WAY
 C. OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD/ANDROS ISLE
 D. OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD/EASTERN SITE ACCESS
 E. OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD/BENOIST FARMS ROAD
 F. OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD/SKEES ROAD
 G. OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD/N JOG ROAD
 3. PLEASE EVALUATE THE WESTBOUND LEFT-TURN QUEUE
 LENGTHS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD/ANDROS ISLE.
 4. FDOT DRIVEWAY PRE-APPLICATION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR
 SITE PLAN APPLICATION.
 5. ADDITIONAL ANALYSES MAY BE REQUIRED BASED ON THE
 SITE DESIGN DURING SITE PLAN APPLICATION.
  
  
 CONDITIONS:
 1. PER THE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS, THE MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT
 INTENSITY SHALL BE LIMITED TO 62,676 SQUARE FEET OF
 CHURCH, 1,200-STUDENT PRIVATE SCHOOL (K-12),
 400-STUDENT DAYCARE, AND 125-ROOM HOTEL, OR INTENSITIES
 EQUIVALENT IN TRIPS EVALUATED BASED ON THE LATEST PALM
 BEACH COUNTY?S TRIP GENERATION RATE TABLE.
  
  
 SHING TSOI
 CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT
 561-494-1141
 [email protected]
 (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS)
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 5 Status F Date 03-12-2021 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 03-12-2021 Time 16:09 Rev Time 2.00
Received By eschneid Date 03-12-2021 Time 16:09 Sent To  
Notes
2021-03-12 16:10:18CASE NO. 1824, A & B
 GRACE FELLOWSHIP ANNEXATION
 8350 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,
 [email protected]
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL
 DOCUMENTS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED
 PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS TO ADDRESS
 THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 - THE COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY,
 MARCH 19, 2021, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE
 APRIL 20, 2021 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS. IF THE CASE IS ELIGIBLE FOR THE APRIL 20,
 2021 PLANNING BOARD, THEN THE SIGNS WOULD NEED TO BE
 POSTED BY APRIL 5, 2021.
  
 1) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE UPDATED EXHIBIT 2A -
 GRACE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH DAILY TRIP GENERATION. PER OUR
 LAST PHONE CONVERSATION, YOU WERE TO PROVIDE THE
 BREAKDOWN OF HOW MANY TRIPS YOU PROPOSED FOR EACH
 FUTURE LAND USE. THE BREAKDOWN WAS NOT SPECIFICALLY
 PROVIDED IN TEXT FORM. STAFF DOES NOT WANT TO MAKE ANY
 ASSUMPTIONS BASED ON THE NUMBERS PROVIDED IN EXHIBIT
 2A. PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN STATEMENT PROVIDING THE
 NUMBER OF TRIPS THAT YOU ARE PROPOSING TO ASSIGN TO
 EACH FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY.
  
 2) THE TRAFFIC LINE OF THE GRACE FELLOWSHIP LEVEL OF
 SERVICE ANALYSIS FOR FUTURE LAND USE AMENDMENT SUMMARY
 TABLE NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED UNDER THE PROPOSED FUTURE
 LAND USE COLUMN TO SHOW THE TOTAL TRIPS THAT THE
 PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USES WOULD GENERATE - 36,984. THIS
 NUMBER WOULD HAVE AN ASTERISK OR OTHER FOOTNOTE
 DESIGNATION THAT THEN LISTS THE BREAK DOWN FOR EACH
 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY AS PROVIDED IN THE RESPONSE
 FOR COMMENT #1.
  
 3) PROVIDE THE PALM BEACH COUNTY WATER AND WASTEWATER
 SERVICE AVAILABILITY LETTER BASED ON THE DEMAND
 GENERATED BY THE MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT UNDER THE FUTURE
 LAND USE LIMITATION FROM COMMENT #1.
  
 4) THE MAILERS FOR THE APRIL 20, 2021 PLANNING BOARD
 WOULD NEED TO BE POSTMARKED BY APRIL 2, 2021. PLEASE
 NOTE THAT DUE TO THE LENGTH OF TIME FROM THE ORIGINAL
 SUBMITTAL, YOU WILL NEED TO RE-RUN THE ADDRESS LIST.
  
 5) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOUR FDOT PREDETERMINATION LETTER
 HAS EXPIRED. AN UPDATED LETTER WILL BE REQUIRED WHEN
 YOU SUBMIT FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 11-03-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 11-03-2020 Time 16:18 Rev Time 2.00
Received By eschneid Date 11-02-2020 Time 14:05 Sent To  
Notes
2020-11-03 16:19:20CASE NO. PB 1824, 1824A & 1824B
 GRACE FELLOWSHIP ANNEXATION
 8350 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE
 (3) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION. ONCE STAFF HAS
 DETERMINED THAT THE COMMENTS ARE SUFFICIENTLY
 ADDRESSED, YOU WILL BE SCHEDULED FOR THE NEXT AVAILABLE
 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. PLEASE NOTE THAT IF YOU SUBMIT
 RESPONSES WHICH CORRECT THE DEFICIENCIES BY TUESDAY,
 NOVEMBER 10, 2020, YOU WILL BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED
 FOR THE DECEMBER 15, 2020 PLANNING BOARD.
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 THE COMMENTS BELOW ARE ONLY FOR THE ANNEXATION AND THE
 INITIAL FUTURE LAND USE AND ZONING ASSIGNMENTS. THE
 PLANNING STAFF WILL ADDRESS THE SITE, LANDSCAPE, ETC.
 PLANS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT OF THE
 SITE AT A FUTURE PPRC MEETING ONCE THE MAJOR PLANNED
 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION HAS BEEN DEEMED SUFFICIENT.
  
 ANNEXATION - COMPLIES
  
 TOTAL ANNEXATION OF 27.44 ACRES.
  
 FUTURE LAND USE
  
 TO CS = 24.52
 TO C = 2.925 (2.93)
  
 1) UPDATED COMMENT: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
  
 THE FLU AMENDMENT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PREPARED BY PINDER
 TROUTMAN CONSULTING, INC. INCLUDES TWO VERSIONS OF
 EXHIBIT 2A- GRACE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH DAILY TRIP
 GENERATION COMPARISON. BOTH VERSIONS INCLUDE DIFFERENT
 ACREAGES FOR THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED FLU
 DESIGNATIONS, RESULTING IN DIFFERENT TRIP GENERATION
 FIGURES. UNDER THE "CONCLUSIONS" SECTION, THE TRAFFIC
 ANALYSIS INDICATES THAT THE PROPOSED LAND USE
 DESIGNATION, ". MEETS THE TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS,
 WITH RESTRICTION TO THE PROPOSED INTENSITY". HOWEVER,
 THE STUDY WOULD APPEAR TO INDICATE THAT THE PROPOSED
 AMENDMENT WOULD FAIL THE TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS IF
 THE TRAFFIC IMPACTS ARE EVALUATED BASED ON THE MAXIMUM
 DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL FOR THE PROPOSED FLU
 DESIGNATIONS. THE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS NEEDS TO BE REVISED
 TO SHOW THE TRAFFIC IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT
 BASED ON THE MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL FOR THE
 PROPOSED FLU DESIGNATIONS IN ADDITION TO ANY PROPOSED
 RESTRICTIONS IN INTENSITY. PLEASE CONTACT ALEX HANSON,
 CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLANNER, IF YOU NEED CLARIFICATION
 ON THIS COMMENT.
  
 2) UPDATED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE LEVEL
 OF SERVICE ANALYSIS IN A SUMMARY TABLE FORMAT; HOWEVER,
 THE ACREAGE USED FOR THE PROPOSED COMMUNITY SERVICE FLU
 DESIGNATION WAS NOT UPDATED TO INCLUDE THE REVISED
 ACREAGE (THE 40 FOOT STRIP). THE EXISTING FLU
 DESIGNATION CORRECTLY USES THE TOTAL OF 27.44 ACRES
 (18.38 ACRES WITH THE COUNTY'S INST/1 FLU AND 9.06
 ACRES WITH THE COUNTY'S HR/8 DESIGNATION). THE PROPOSED
 FLU DESIGNATION, THE TABLE USES ONLY A TOTAL OF 24.51
 ACRES (21.58 ACRES WITH THE CS FLU AND 2.93 ACRES WITH
 THE C FLU DESIGNATION). THE TOTAL ACREAGE FOR THE SITE
 IS 27.44 ACRES, WHICH IS WHAT NEEDS TO BE SHOWN ON THE
 LOS SUMMARY TABLE.
  
 3) THE LOS SUMMARY TABLE ALSO INCLUDES A SECTION FOR
 THE TRAFFIC IMPACTS OF THE AMENDMENT. THE TRAFFIC
 IMPACTS IDENTIFIED IN THIS TABLE DO NOT APPEAR TO BE
 CONSISTENT WITH THOSE INCLUDED IN THE MOST RECENT FLU
 AMENDMENT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PREPARED BY PINDER TROUTMAN
 CONSULTING, INC. (EITHER VERSION OF EXHIBIT 2A).
  
 4) THE APPLICATION CONTAINS A LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS
 FOR FUTURE LAND USE AMENDMENT PREPARED BY CAULFIELD &
 WHEELER, INC. SIMILAR TO THE LOS SUMMARY TABLE, THE
 PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER IMPACTS WERE CALCULATED BASED
 ON 24.51 ACRES AND NOT ON THE ACTUAL SIZE OF THE SITE
 (27.44 ACRES). IN ADDITION, BOTH THE EXISTING AND THE
 PROPOSED ESTIMATED DRAINAGE FLOWS ARE BASED ON 25.34
 ACRES. ALL OF THESE CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE PREPARED
 BASED ON 27.44 ACRES.
  
 5) UPDATED COMMENT: THE RESPONSE STATES THAT YOU WOULD
 RATHER USE TRIPS INSTEAD OF SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THE FLU
 RESTRICTION; HOWEVER, NONE OF THE DOCUMENTS INCLUDED IN
 THE FLU AMENDMENT APPLICATION INDICATES THAT THE
 APPLICATION IS BEING RESTRICTED TO A SPECIFIC NUMBER OF
 TRIPS, OR WHAT NUMBER OF TRIPS THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT
 IS BEING RESTRICTED TO. THE NUMBER OF TRIPS NEEDS TO BE
 CLEARLY ENUMERATED. THIS WILL ALSO NEED TO BE INCLUDED
 ON THE FUTURE SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS.
  
 REZONING
  
 6) THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INCLUDES THAT THE
 COMMERCIAL PORTION WILL BE FURTHER REZONED TO CPD AS
 PART OF THIS APPLICATION. WITHOUT HAVING A MASTER
 DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE COMMERCIAL PARCEL, STAFF WILL
 NOT MOVE FORWARD A REZONING TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
 FOR THIS PORTION OF THE SITE. ONCE THERE IS A PROJECT
 READY TO BE DEVELOPED, IT CAN BE DETERMINED IF A
 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IS EVEN REQUIRED, OR IF THE PROJECT
 CAN BE BUILT BY RIGHT WITHIN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL
 ZONING DESIGNATION.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 06-26-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 06-26-2020 Time 16:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2020-06-26 16:56:21CASE NO. PB 1824, 1824A & 1824B
 GRACE FELLOWSHIP ANNEXATION
 8350 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE
 (3) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION. ONCE STAFF HAS
 DETERMINED THAT THE COMMENTS ARE SUFFICIENTLY
 ADDRESSED, YOU WILL BE SCHEDULED FOR THE NEXT AVAILABLE
 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM
 THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY SEPTEMBER 26, 2020), THE
 CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION
 SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 THE COMMENTS BELOW ARE ONLY FOR THE ANNEXATION AND THE
 INITIAL FUTURE LAND USE AND ZONING ASSIGNMENTS. THE
 PLANNING STAFF WILL ADDRESS THE SITE, LANDSCAPE, ETC.
 PLANS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT OF THE
 SITE AT A FUTURE PPRC MEETING ONCE THE MAJOR PLANNED
 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION HAS BEEN DEEMED SUFFICIENT.
  
 ANNEXATION
  
 1) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION REGARDING
 THE AREA PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED:
  
 UPDATED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE
 INFORMATION THAT THE CANAL AREA BETWEEN THE TWO GRACE
 PARCELS IS NOT OWNED BY THE CHURCH. THE CITY SURVEYOR
 HAS INDICATED THAT THIS IS OWNED BY THE OWNED BY THE
 LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT (WHICH IS SIMILAR TO WHAT
 THE PALM BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER SHOWS). STAFF
 CANNOT FURTHER PROCESS THE ANNEXATION WITHOUT A
 CONCURRENT VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION APPLICATION BY THE LAKE
 WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT, WITH THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION
 (AND PREFERABLE A SEPARATE PARCEL DESIGNATION) OF THE
 LAND BETWEEN THE TWO GRACE FELLOWSHIP PARCELS. SINCE
 YOU ARE REQUESTING THE ANNEXATION, IT IS YOUR
 RESPONSIBILITY TO PROVIDE THIS CORRECTED INFORMATION TO
 THE CITY, INCLUDING ANY CORRECTION THAT PAPA NEEDS TO
 DO TO THEIR MAPS.
  
 FUTURE LAND USE
  
 1) UPDATED COMMENT: PROVIDE AN UPDATED SKETCH AND
 DESCRIPTION FOR THE GRACE FELLOWSHIP BOUNDARY (LESS
 PHASE IV-HOTEL) BASED ON THE UPDATED ACREAGE (23.41
 ACRES).
  
 2) UPDATED COMMENT: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
  
 A. PROVIDE UPDATED EXISTING FLU ANALYSIS WHICH USES THE
 CORRECT 17.28 ACRES FOR PCN 00-42-43-27-03-001-0140.
 THE UPDATED ACREAGE IS BASED ON THE TITLE REVIEW AND
 LISTED ON THE SURVEY.
 B. PROVIDE UPDATED EXISTING FLU ANALYSIS WHICH USES THE
 CORRECT 9.06 ACRES FOR PCN 00-42-43-27-03-001-0151
 LISTED ON THE SURVEY.
 C. PROVIDE UPDATED PROPOSED FLU MAXIMUM TRAFFIC
 INTENSITY FOR THE PROPOSED 23.41 ACRES OF WPB COMMUNITY
 SERVICE.
  
 3) REPEAT COMMENT: THE LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS FOR
 FUTURE LAND USE (NON-TRAFFIC) MUST SHOW THE MAXIMUM
 SERVICE DEMAND UNDER THE EXISTING PALM BEACH COUNTY FLU
 DESIGNATIONS (USING THE UPDATED ACREAGE) AND THEN THE
 MAXIMUM SERVICE DEMAND UNDER THE PROPOSED WEST PALM
 BEACH FLU DESIGNATIONS FOR THE SELF-IMPOSED MAXIMUM
 BUILDOUT (AS DETERMINED BY THE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS).
 PROVIDE LETTERS FROM THE APPLICABLE SERVICE PROVIDERS
 THAT THEY HAVE CAPACITY TO SERVE ANY INCREASE IN
 SERVICE DEMAND.
  
 4) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE LEVEL OF SERVICE
 ANALYSIS IN A SUMMARY TABLE FORMAT (PAGE 29 OF THE
 CITY'S DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION HAS AN EXAMPLE OF THE
 LOS TABLE FORMAT).
  
 5) REPEAT COMMENT: STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE RESTRICTION
 ON THE INTENSITY CONTAINED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
 AMENDMENT TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS. YOUR TEAM NEEDS TO
 DECIDE IF YOU WANT TO RESTRICT TO THE SPECIFIC
 USES/SQUARE FOOTAGE THAT IS LISTED IN THE TRAFFIC
 ANALYSIS OR IF THOSE USES/SQUARE FOOTAGES SHOULD BE
 CONVERTED TO A FIXED NUMBER OF TRIPS. PREVIOUS
 APPLICATIONS TYPICALLY USE THE TRIP METHOD SO THAT
 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT HAS MORE FLEXIBILITY. FOR EXAMPLE
 USING A 125 ROOM HOTEL WOULD REQUIRE AN ADDITIONAL FLU
 AMENDMENT IF THE HOTEL IS NOT VIABLE AND AN ALTERNATIVE
 COMMERCIAL USE IS DESIRED. HOWEVER, USING 940 TRIPS AS
 SHOWN IN THE PROVIDED GENERATION TABLE, WOULD NOT
 REQUIRE THE ADDED STEP OF A FLU AMENDMENT UNLESS MORE
 THAN 940 TRIPS ARE PROPOSED FOR THE ALTERNATIVE
 COMMERCIAL USE.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 03-26-2020 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 03-26-2020 Time 12:07 Rev Time 1.00
Received By eschneid Date 03-13-2020 Time 16:27 Sent To  
Notes
2020-03-26 12:07:26CASE NO. PB 1824, 1824A & 1824B
 GRACE FELLOWSHIP ANNEXATION
 8350 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN
 (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY,
 APRIL 10, 2020, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE
 MAY 19, 2020 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM
 THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY MAY 26, 2020), THE CASE
 SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL
 REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 THE COMMENTS BELOW ARE ONLY FOR THE ANNEXATION AND THE
 INITIAL FUTURE LAND USE AND ZONING ASSIGNMENTS. THE
 PLANNING STAFF WILL ADDRESS THE SITE, LANDSCAPE, ETC.
 PLANS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT OF THE
 SITE AT A FUTURE PPRC MEETING ONCE THE MAJOR PLANNED
 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION HAS BEEN DEEMED SUFFICIENT.
  
 ANNEXATION
  
 1) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION REGARDING
 THE AREA PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED:
  
 A. UPDATED COMMENT: TRACT 14, BLOCK 1 OF THE PALM BEACH
 FARMS CO. PLAT NO. 9 LISTS THE EAST DIMENSION LINE AS
 1,195.6 FEET AND THE WEST DIMENSION LINES AS 1,221.2
 FEET. THE SURVEY PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION SHOWS
 THE EAST DIMENSION LINE AS 1,203.13 FEET (1,133.13 +
 70) AND THE WEST DIMENSION LINE AS 1,227.29 FEET
 (1157.29 + 70). PLEASE EXPLAIN THESE DISCREPANCIES SO
 THAT THE ACCURATE LAND CAN BE ANNEXED. ------ THE
 COMMENT RESPONSE STATED THAT THE MEASURED DIMENSION
 DIFFERS FROM THE PLATTED DIMENSION. THE CITY SURVEYOR
 STATED THAT THE SURVEY NEEDS TO BE UPDATED TO REFLECT
 BOTH THE PLATTED AND THE MEASURED DIMENSIONS.
  
 B. UPDATED COMMENT: THE SURVEY SHOWS THAT TRACT 14,
 BLOCK 1 OF THE PALM BEACH FARMS CO. PLAT NO. 9 HAS 70
 FEET FROM THE NORTH SIDE AND 40 FEET FROM THE EAST SIDE
 REMOVED; HOWEVER, THE LISTED ORB/PG FOR THIS AREA LIST
 THESE AREAS AS EASEMENTS AND NOT AS CONVEYED TITLE.
 ADDITIONALLY, PAPA SHOWS THESE AREAS AS PART OF TRACT
 14. PLEASE EXPLAIN THESE DISCREPANCIES SINCE THE
 ACREAGE AS PART OF THE ANNEXATION WILL CHANGE.
 ADDITIONALLY, IF THESE AREAS HAVE BEEN CONVEYED TO LAKE
 WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT OWNERSHIP, THEN TRACT 14 IS NO
 LONGER CONTIGUOUS TO THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH.
 ------ PROVIDE AN OPINION OF TITLE FROM A TITLE
 ATTORNEY OR TITLE COMPANY, INCLUDING THE RECORDED BACK
 UP INSTRUMENTS, REGARDING THE AREAS SHOWN REMOVED FROM
 TRACT 14, BLOCK 1. THE 1985 DEED CONVEYED ?ALL OF TRACT
 14, BLOCK 1?WEST OF THE CANAL ROW? TO BEREAN BAPTIST
 TEMPLE, WHICH INDICATES THAT THE NORTH 70 FEET IS STILL
 OWNED BY GRACE FELLOWSHIP. THE RESPONSE CITES THE
 RIGHTS IN RESERVATIONS DOCUMENT FROM 1972 AS CONVEYING
 THE CANAL AREAS AS RIGHT-OF-WAY, SO THERE IS A
 DISCREPANCY IN THE SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS THAT NEEDS TO BE
 CLEARED UP.
  
 C. UPDATED COMMENT: PAPA SHOWS THE RIGHT-OF-WAY BETWEEN
 THE TWO PARCELS PROPOSED FOR ANNEXATION AS OWNED BY THE
 LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT. STAFF CANNOT FURTHER
 PROCESS THE ANNEXATION WITHOUT A CONCURRENT VOLUNTARY
 ANNEXATION APPLICATION BY THE LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE
 DISTRICT, WITH THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION (AND PREFERABLE A
 SEPARATE PARCEL DESIGNATION) OF THE LAND BETWEEN THE
 TWO GRACE FELLOWSHIP PARCELS. ----- THE OPINION OF
 TITLE MUST ALSO INCLUDE SPECIFICALLY INDICATE WHO OWNS
 THESE AREAS AND HOW THEY ARE OWNED ? IN FEE,
 RIGHT-OF-WAY, ETC. SO STAFF CAN VERIFY THE CORRECT
 ANNEXATION PROCEDURE.
  
 FUTURE LAND USE
  
 1) THANK YOU FOR AMENDING THE APPLICATION TO DESIGNATE
 THE APPROPRIATE FUTURE LAND USE (AND ZONING) BASED ON
 THE ACTUAL USE OF THE PROPERTY.
  
 2) NEW COMMENT: STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE RESTRICTION ON
 THE INTENSITY CONTAINED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
 AMENDMENT TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS. YOUR TEAM NEEDS TO
 DECIDE IF YOU WANT TO RESTRICT TO THE SPECIFIC
 USES/SQUARE FOOTAGE THAT IS LISTED IN THE TRAFFIC
 ANALYSIS OR IF THOSE USES/SQUARE FOOTAGES SHOULD BE
 CONVERTED TO A FIXED NUMBER OF TRIPS. PREVIOUS
 APPLICATIONS TYPICALLY USE THE TRIP METHOD SO THAT
 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT HAS MORE FLEXIBILITY. FOR EXAMPLE
 USING A 125 ROOM HOTEL WOULD REQUIRE AN ADDITIONAL FLU
 AMENDMENT IF THE HOTEL IS NOT VIABLE AND AN ALTERNATIVE
 COMMERCIAL USE IS DESIRED. HOWEVER, USING 940 TRIPS AS
 SHOWN IN THE PROVIDED GENERATION TABLE, WOULD NOT
 REQUIRE THE ADDED STEP OF A FLU AMENDMENT UNLESS MORE
 THAN 940 TRIPS ARE PROPOSED FOR THE ALTERNATIVE
 COMMERCIAL USE.
  
 3) UPDATED COMMENT: THE LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS MUST
 BE PROVIDED IN A SUMMARY TABLE FORMAT (PAGE 29 OF THE
 CITY?S DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION HAS AN EXAMPLE OF THE
 LOS TABLE FORMAT). PLEASE NOTE THAT THE LOS ANALYSIS
 PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION MUST SHOW THE MAXIMUM
 SERVICE DEMAND UNDER THE EXISTING PALM BEACH COUNTY FLU
 DESIGNATIONS AND THEN THE MAXIMUM SERVICE DEMAND UNDER
 THE PROPOSED WEST PALM BEACH FLU DESIGNATIONS FOR THE
 SELF-IMPOSED MAXIMUM BUILDOUT (AS DETERMINED BY THE
 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS). PROVIDE LETTERS FROM THE APPLICABLE
 SERVICE PROVIDERS THAT THEY HAVE CAPACITY TO SERVE ANY
 INCREASE IN SERVICE DEMAND.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-11-2019 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 12-11-2019 Time 12:45 Rev Time 2.00
Received By eschneid Date 12-11-2019 Time 12:45 Sent To  
Notes
2019-12-11 12:45:35CASE NO. PB 1824, 1824A & 1824B
 GRACE FELLOWSHIP ANNEXATION
 8350 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN
 (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY,
 DECEMBER 27, 2019, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR
 THE FEBRUARY 18, 2020 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY FEBRUARY 11,
 2020), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY
 FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION.
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 THE COMMENTS BELOW ARE ONLY FOR THE ANNEXATION AND THE
 INITIAL FUTURE LAND USE AND ZONING ASSIGNMENTS. THE
 PLANNING STAFF WILL ADDRESS THE SITE, LANDSCAPE, ETC.
 PLANS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT OF THE
 SITE AT A FUTURE PPRC MEETING ONCE THE MAJOR PLANNED
 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION HAS BEEN DEEMED SUFFICIENT.
  
 ANNEXATION
  
 1) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION REGARDING
 THE AREA PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED:
  
 A. TRACT 14, BLOCK 1 OF THE PALM BEACH FARMS CO. PLAT
 NO. 9 LISTS THE EAST DIMENSION LINE AS 1,195.6 FEET AND
 THE WEST DIMENSION LINES AS 1,221.2 FEET. THE SURVEY
 PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION SHOWS THE EAST DIMENSION
 LINE AS 1,203.13 FEET (1,133.13 + 70) AND THE WEST
 DIMENSION LINE AS 1,227.29 FEET (1157.29 + 70). PLEASE
 EXPLAIN THESE DISCREPANCIES SO THAT THE ACCURATE LAND
 CAN BE ANNEXED.
  
 B. THE SURVEY SHOWS THAT TRACT 14, BLOCK 1 OF THE PALM
 BEACH FARMS CO. PLAT NO. 9 HAS 70 FEET FROM THE NORTH
 SIDE AND 40 FEET FROM THE EAST SIDE REMOVED; HOWEVER,
 THE LISTED ORB/PG FOR THIS AREA LIST THESE AREAS AS
 EASEMENTS AND NOT AS CONVEYED TITLE. ADDITIONALLY, PAPA
 SHOWS THESE AREAS AS PART OF TRACT 14. PLEASE EXPLAIN
 THESE DISCREPANCIES SINCE THE ACREAGE AS PART OF THE
 ANNEXATION WILL CHANGE. ADDITIONALLY, IF THESE AREAS
 HAVE BEEN CONVEYED TO LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT
 OWNERSHIP, THEN TRACT 1 IS NO LONGER CONTIGUOUS TO THE
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH.
  
 C. PAPA SHOWS THE RIGHT-OF-WAY BETWEEN THE TWO PARCELS
 PROPOSED FOR ANNEXATION AS OWNED BY THE LAKE WORTH
 DRAINAGE DISTRICT. STAFF CANNOT FURTHER PROCESS THE
 ANNEXATION WITHOUT A CONCURRENT VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION
 APPLICATION BY THE LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT, WITH
 THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION (AND PREFERABLE A SEPARATE PARCEL
 DESIGNATION) OF THE LAND BETWEEN THE TWO GRACE
 FELLOWSHIP PARCELS.
  
 FUTURE LAND USE
  
 1) STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE REQUEST TO ASSIGN A
 COMMERCIAL (C) FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION TO THE
 ENTIRETY OF THE ANNEXED PARCELS. THE APPROPRIATE FUTURE
 LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR THE EXISTING CHURCH AND SCHOOL
 AND THE ATHLETIC FIELD EXPANSION IS COMMUNITY SERVICE
 (CS). THE FUTURE HOTEL SITE CAN BE ASSIGNED A C FUTURE
 LAND USE.
  
 2) PROVIDE A SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE
 PORTION OF THE SITE THAT WOULD HAVE THE C DESIGNATION.
 PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMMERCIAL PORTION OF THE
 SITE (OR AS PART OF A FURTHER REZONING TO A COMMERCIAL
 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT), THE COMMERCIAL PORTION WILL NEED
 TO BE SUBDIVIDED FROM THE BALANCE OF THE GRACE
 FELLOWSHIP PROPERTY.
  
 3) THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS STATES THAT
 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN INCLUDES A 62,676 SQUARE
 FOOT CHURCH WHILE THE LATEST SITE PLAN LISTS THE CHURCH
 AS HAVING 65,226 SQUARE FEET. THE TOTAL DEVELOPMENT
 MUST BE CONSISTENT ON ALL DOCUMENTS, ESPECIALLY SINCE
 THE PROPOSAL IS TO LIMIT THE DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY.
  
 4) REVIEW THE LEVEL OF SERVICE INFORMATION TO SEE IF
 ANY CHANGES ARE NEEDED BASED ON THE ENTIRE SITE NOT
 HAVING A C FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
  
 5) THE LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS MUST BE PROVIDED IN A
 SUMMARY TABLE FORMAT.
  
 6) THE FUTURE LAND USE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT MENTIONS
 A FAST FOOD RESTAURANT IN THE COMMERCIAL PORTION OF THE
 SITE, YET THIS IS NOT SHOWN IN ANY OF THE LEVEL OF
 SERVICE ANALYSIS. PLEASE EXPLAIN.
  
 ZONING
  
 1) STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE REQUEST TO ASSIGN A
 GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) ZONING DESIGNATION TO THE
 ENTIRETY OF THE ANNEXED PARCELS. THE APPROPRIATE ZONING
 DESIGNATION FOR THE EXISTING CHURCH AND SCHOOL AND THE
 ATHLETIC FIELD EXPANSION IS COMMUNITY SERVICE (CS). THE
 FUTURE HOTEL SITE CAN BE ASSIGNED A GC FUTURE LAND USE.
  
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved