 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z18110023
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z18110023 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-11-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
12-11-2018 |
Time |
19:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
02-15-2019 |
Time |
10:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-12-11 19:28:17 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. FLOOD ZONE. ACCORDING TO THE ADOPTED FLOOD INSURANCE | | | RATE MAPS (FIRMS), THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS IN FLOOD | | | ZONE AE, WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 12 FT NAVD. THE | | | FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL ASSOCIATED | | | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS ETC.) SHALL | | | BE 24 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD | | | ELEVATION. | | | | | | 3. NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. SHEET C101, | | | DEMOLITION PLAN, SHOWS THE REMOVAL OF 4 ACCESSIBLE | | | PARKING SPACES, BUT SHEET C301, SITE PLAN, SHOWS ONLY 2 | | | ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES BEING REINSTATED. THE PARKING | | | REQUIREMENTS TABLES ON BOTH SHEET C300 AND C301, SITE | | | PLAN, STATE THAT 8 ACCESSIBLE SPACES (6 + 2) ARE | | | PROPOSED, BUT THE PLANS ONLY SHOW THE LOCATION OF 2 OF | | | THOSE SPACES. THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING | | | SPACES PROVIDED SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION | | | 208.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE. | | | | | | 4. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PER SECTION | | | 208.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING | | | SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE | | | OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE | | | ENTRANCE. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL | | | COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE | | | | | | 5. BUILDING LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND | | | OTHER STRUCTURES. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, | | | COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF | | | OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE | | | VERIFIED. | | | | | | 6. THE ADDITION TO THE EXISTING BUILDING IS COVERED BY | | | CHAPTER 11 OF THE FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING CODE. THE | | | HEIGHT AND/OR AREA INCREASE DUE TO THE PROPOSED | | | ADDITION SHALL NOT INCREASE THE TOTAL BUILDING HEIGHT | | | AND/OR AREA BEYOND THAT ALLOWED UNDER THE APPLICABLE | | | PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | FOR THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION USED. | | | | | | 7. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, | | | GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND | | | OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS, | | | SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 8. BUILDING ADDRESS. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING, AND UNIT | | | WITH AN INDEPENDENT ENTRANCE FROM THE STREET, SHALL | | | HAVE A SEPARATE ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT | | | MICHAEL ORIO, GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 | | | 1080, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 9. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT | | | TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE | | | ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP | | | ASSESSMENT, CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC | | | PLACES COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
12-11-2018 |
Time |
19:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-12-10 10:57:30 | Z18110023_JFK NORTH HOSPITAL MAJOR PD AMENDMENT | | | (NOVEMBER 13, 2018 SUBMITTAL) | | | TRAFFIC STUDY | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER. | | | 2. IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY, THE SOUTHERN DRIVEWAY DOES NOT | | | PERMIT EGRESS VEHICLES TO MAKE LEFT-TURN. PLEASE REVISE | | | THE TRIP ASSIGNMENT. | | | SITE PLAN | | | 3. ON SHEET C300, PROVIDE CROSSWALK FROM THE BUILDING | | | TO THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE INTERNAL ROADWAY. ALSO | | | PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP. | | | 4. ON SHEET C301, PROVIDE AUTOTURN PATH TO VERIFY IF A | | | PASSENGER CAR CAN MAKE RIGHT-TURN INTO THE FIRST | | | PARKING AISLE ON THE SOUTH. | | | 5. ON SHEET C301, PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION BETWEEN | | | THE EXISTING PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION NEAR THE MATCH LINE | | | WITH SHEET C300 AND THE PROPOSED BUILDING . | | | 6. PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING NEAR THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS. | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-31-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
05-31-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
05-31-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-08-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rrossano |
Date |
04-08-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
04-08-2019 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-04-08 11:01:20 | PLEASE PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM AND DATUM CONVERSION | | | INFORMATION NOTE (NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929) ON ALL | | | UTILITY RELATED SHEETS. | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND | | | IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED | | | AREAS. | | | | | | PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEMANDS | | | FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM & PEAK) AND FIRE | | | FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR | | | SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER. | | | | | | SHEETS C400 AND C401: REMOVE "CITY OF ATLANTIS" FROM | | | NOTE 5 ON EACH PAGE. | | | | | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | CONCERNS, THANKS. | | | | | | RICK ROSSANO | | | PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 | | | MOBILE: (561) 246-9525 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING | | | | | | MANNY GONZALEZ | | | SENIOR ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1085 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 | | | MOBILE: (561) 644-7301 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING | | | | | | CENTRAL OPERATIONS CENTER (DISPATCH): | | | 24-HOUR EMERGENCY RESPONSE SERVICES TO PUBLIC | | | UTILITIES, PUBLIC WORKS, PARKS, ETC. 561-822-2210 | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-06-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
RRossano |
Date |
12-06-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
rrossano |
Date |
12-06-2018 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
I |
|
| Notes |
| 2018-12-06 12:30:07 | PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEMANDS | | | FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM AND PEAK) AND FIRE | | | FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PER FAC 64E-6 FOR | | | SEWER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR WATER. | | | | | | PROVIDE PROFILE VIEW OF ALL UTILITY CONFLICTS AT NEW | | | BUILDINGS OVER EXISTING UTILITIES. | | | | | | IDENTIFY OWNERSHIP OF WATER MAIN (CITY OF WPB VS. | | | PRIVATE). | | | | | | SHOW CITY OF WPB POINT OF SERVICE. | | | | | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | | CONCERNS, THANKS. | | | | | | RICK ROSSANO | | | PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 | | | MOBILE: (561) 246-9525 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING | | | | | | MANNY GONZALEZ | | | SENIOR ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1085 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 | | | MOBILE: (561) 644-7301 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
12-04-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
12-04-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
12-04-2018 |
Time |
14:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-12-04 14:11:37 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION | | | DISTANCES FROM MAIN STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER | | | TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY MONITORED FOR THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER PROTECTION. | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS ON HOW THIS CONSTRUCTION | | | WILL/CAN BE ISOLATED FROM THE EXISTING BUIDLING(S) AND | | | WILL NOT AFFECT ANY LIFE SAFETY OR EXITING CONDITIONS. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 6TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | 6. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE INCLUDE THE | | | OCCUPANCY TYPE, PER THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | AND WHETHER IT IS MIXED OR SEPARATED OCCUPANCY. | | | | | | 7. FOR PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL, PLEASE ENSURE THAT A FIRE | | | LOAD CALCULATION IS INCLUDED AND THAT ADEQUATE WATER | | | SUPPLY IS EXISTING OR WILL BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | IF THE EXISTING FIRE SPRINKLER OR FIRE ALARM SYSTEM(S) | | | WILL BE EXTENDED INTO THE NEW AREAS, PROVIDE SPECIFIC | | | DETAILS THAT THE EXISTING SYSTEM(S) CAN ACCOMDATE THE | | | ADDITION(S). | | | | | | 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED | | | ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | ALL NEW FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDC?S PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE | | | BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AND | | | FDC?S SHOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE STREET | | | OR ACCESS ROADWAY TO ALLOW FREE ACCESS FOR OTHER | | | ARRIVING EMERGENCY VEHICLES. | | | | | | 9. PROVIDE FOR A FIRE SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM PER | | | THE APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CODE. FOR ANY LIFE SAFETY | | | ENGINEERED SYSTEM, I.E FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM, | | | ENSURE THEY COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FS 61G AND | | | SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PLAN. | | | | | | 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 11. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (REQUIRED WITH FIRE | | | SPRINKLER SYSTEM) THAT A KNOX BOX WITH KEYS FOR ENTRY | | | DOOR LOCKS BE PROVIDED FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS. | | | | | | 12. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ITS FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 13. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-27-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
08-27-2019 |
Time |
15:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
08-27-2019 |
Time |
15:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-08-27 15:48:32 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: WEST PALM HOSPITAL CSPD Z18110023 | | | AUGUST 27, 2019 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. CORRECT THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN AND LIST FOR THE | | | FOLLOWING: | | | ? SATISFIED. ALL TREES BELOW 20 FOOT CANOPY ARE TO BE | | | MITIGATED ONE FOR ONE AND THE CANOPY VALUE NEEDS TO BE | | | CORRECTED TO THE CATEGORY VALUE. I.E. LIVE OAK CATEGORY | | | 1, IS A 300 SQ FT CANOPY VALUE. BOTTLEBRUSH CATEGORY 2 | | | IS A 150 SQ FT CANOPY VALUE. SABAL PALM CATEGORY 3 IS A | | | 100 SQ FT CANOPY VALUE. CORRECT VALUE AS SHOWN IS | | | 16,395 SQ FT. | | | TREE CANOPY DIAMETER AND CANOPY VALUES MUST BE SHOWN | | | FOR EACH TREE TO BE REMOVED. | | | ? SATISFIED. TREES REMAINING WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION | | | LIMITS NEED TO BE SHOWN AS REQUIRING ROOT PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE | | | TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR | | | RELOCATED. THERE ARE MULTIPLE LIVE OAKS THAT CAN BE | | | RELOCATED ON SITE TO AREAS WITHOUT TREES. THERE ARE | | | LARGE TREES WITHIN THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION THAT CAN | | | BE PRESERVED BY DESIGNING THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK LAYOUT | | | TO AVOID THEM. | | | LIVE OAK TREES 311, 314 AND 315 CAN BE PRESERVED IF THE | | | SIDEWALK CAN BE REDESIGNED, AND IF NOT, SINCE THEIR | | | CONDITION IS LISTED AS ?GOOD? ON THE TREE DISPOSITION | | | LIST, THEY MUST BE RELOCATED. | | | LIVE OAK TREES 363, 386, 387, 390, 391, 392, 393, 395, | | | 396, AND SABAL PALM 394 ARE REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED AS | | | THEIR CONDITION IS LISTED AS ?GOOD? ON THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION LIST. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE AND | | | LANDSCAPE AREA ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE AFFECTED | | | AREA AND SHOW THE CHANGE FROM APPROVED PLAN. | | | THE CALCULATIONS AS SHOWN ARE NOT CLEAR, AND DO NOT ADD | | | UP. | | | THE CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE SHOWN FOR THE ENTIRE SITE, | | | AS ADDITIONAL AREA IS BEING ADDED TO THE PD. THE | | | REQUIRED OPEN SPACE FOR CS IS 40%. OPEN SPACE IS ALL | | | NON-BUILDING AREA. LANDSCAPE AREA SHOULD BE EQUAL OR | | | GREATER THAN 15%. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF TREES PROPOSED | | | COMPARED TO THE NUMBER OF TREES FROM THE APPROVED | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE AFFECTED AREA. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CORRECTED CHART SHOWING CURRENT | | | CODE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA FRIENDLY REQUIREMENTS | | | PER SECTION 94-442 (G) AND PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 50 | | | POINTS. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. ADD COLUMNS TO THE PLANT LIST FOR NATIVE | | | PLANT AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN WITH | | | IDENTIFYING TAGS ON THE PLAN AND INCLUDE ON THE PLANT | | | LIST. | | | | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND SCREENING FOR ALL | | | ABOVE GROUND UTILITY VALVES, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS, A/C | | | UNITS, ETC. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER AND SEWER LINES | | | ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH | | | LANDSCAPING. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS | | | REQUIRED TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES AND LABEL THEM ON THE | | | PLAN. | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. | | | PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT | | | MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | SHOW THE CALCULATION OF THE PERCENTAGE ON THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN BASED ON THE PROPOSED PLANT LIST. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 2/19/19: | | | 12. SATISFIED. SHEET L006 DOES NOT REPRESENT ANY | | | MISSING TREES FROM THE APPROVED PLANS BEING REPLACED AT | | | SOME OF THE TERMINAL ISLANDS AND THE LANDSCAPE BUFFERS | | | ALONG THE PROPERTY LINES. ALL TREES AS APPROVED NEED TO | | | BE SHOWN AS BEING REPLACED. | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. THE WAX MYRTLE AS SPECIFIED ARE NOT A | | | SUCCESSFUL SPECIES WHEN USED IN PARKING LOT ISLANDS. | | | CHANGE TO A MORE DEPENDABLE AND SUSTAINABLE SPECIES. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 4/22/19: | | | 14. SATISFIED. TWO NEW TERMINAL ISLANDS AND ONE | | | INTERIOR ISLAND IN THE PARKING AREA SOUTH OF THE NEW | | | BUILDING ON SHEET L102 DO NOT SHOW THE REQUIRED TREE. | | | THESE ARE NEW LANDSCAPE AREAS AND ARE REQUIRED TO MEET | | | CODE. | | | TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS REQUIRE A TREE. THESE ARE | | | NEWLY CONSTRUCTED PARKING FEATURES AND MUST MEET THE | | | CODE REQUIREMENT. | | | | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-06-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
06-06-2019 |
Time |
11:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
06-06-2019 |
Time |
11:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-06-06 11:27:18 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: WEST PALM HOSPITAL CSPD Z18110023 | | | JUNE 6, 2019 | | | RESPONSES TO COMMENTS DID NOT REFLECT COMMENTS FROM | | | 4/22/19 REVIEW. | | | ALL COMMENTS WERE SATISFIED EXCEPT COMMENT 14. | | | | | | 14. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. TWO NEW TERMINAL ISLANDS AND | | | ONE INTERIOR ISLAND IN THE PARKING AREA SOUTH OF THE | | | NEW BUILDING ON SHEET L102 DO NOT SHOW THE REQUIRED | | | TREE. | | | THESE ARE NEW LANDSCAPE AREAS AND ARE REQUIRED TO MEET | | | CODE. | | | | | | TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS REQUIRE A TREE. THESE ARE | | | NEWLY CONSTRUCTED PARKING FEATURES AND MUST MEET THE | | | CODE REQUIREMENT. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-22-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
04-22-2019 |
Time |
15:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
04-22-2019 |
Time |
15:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-04-22 15:59:16 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: WEST PALM HOSPITAL CSPD Z18110023 | | | APRIL 22, 2019 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. CORRECT THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN AND LIST FOR THE | | | FOLLOWING: | | | ? SATISFIED. ALL TREES BELOW 20 FOOT CANOPY ARE TO BE | | | MITIGATED ONE FOR ONE AND THE CANOPY VALUE NEEDS TO BE | | | CORRECTED TO THE CATEGORY VALUE. I.E. LIVE OAK CATEGORY | | | 1, IS A 300 SQ FT CANOPY VALUE. BOTTLEBRUSH CATEGORY 2 | | | IS A 150 SQ FT CANOPY VALUE. SABAL PALM CATEGORY 3 IS A | | | 100 SQ FT CANOPY VALUE. CORRECT VALUE AS SHOWN IS | | | 16,395 SQ FT. | | | TREE CANOPY DIAMETER AND CANOPY VALUES MUST BE SHOWN | | | FOR EACH TREE TO BE REMOVED. | | | ? SATISFIED. TREES REMAINING WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION | | | LIMITS NEED TO BE SHOWN AS REQUIRING ROOT PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE | | | TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR | | | RELOCATED. THERE ARE MULTIPLE LIVE OAKS THAT CAN BE | | | RELOCATED ON SITE TO AREAS WITHOUT TREES. THERE ARE | | | LARGE TREES WITHIN THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION THAT CAN | | | BE PRESERVED BY DESIGNING THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK LAYOUT | | | TO AVOID THEM. | | | LIVE OAK TREES 311, 314 AND 315 CAN BE PRESERVED IF THE | | | SIDEWALK CAN BE REDESIGNED, AND IF NOT, SINCE THEIR | | | CONDITION IS LISTED AS ?GOOD? ON THE TREE DISPOSITION | | | LIST, THEY MUST BE RELOCATED. | | | LIVE OAK TREES 363, 386, 387, 390, 391, 392, 393, 395, | | | 396, AND SABAL PALM 394 ARE REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED AS | | | THEIR CONDITION IS LISTED AS ?GOOD? ON THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION LIST. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE AND | | | LANDSCAPE AREA ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE AFFECTED | | | AREA AND SHOW THE CHANGE FROM APPROVED PLAN. | | | THE CALCULATIONS AS SHOWN ARE NOT CLEAR, AND DO NOT ADD | | | UP. | | | THE CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE SHOWN FOR THE ENTIRE SITE, | | | AS ADDITIONAL AREA IS BEING ADDED TO THE PD. THE | | | REQUIRED OPEN SPACE FOR CS IS 40%. OPEN SPACE IS ALL | | | NON-BUILDING AREA. LANDSCAPE AREA SHOULD BE EQUAL OR | | | GREATER THAN 15%. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF TREES PROPOSED | | | COMPARED TO THE NUMBER OF TREES FROM THE APPROVED | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE AFFECTED AREA. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CORRECTED CHART SHOWING CURRENT | | | CODE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA FRIENDLY REQUIREMENTS | | | PER SECTION 94-442 (G) AND PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 50 | | | POINTS. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. ADD COLUMNS TO THE PLANT LIST FOR NATIVE | | | PLANT AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN WITH | | | IDENTIFYING TAGS ON THE PLAN AND INCLUDE ON THE PLANT | | | LIST. | | | | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND SCREENING FOR ALL | | | ABOVE GROUND UTILITY VALVES, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS, A/C | | | UNITS, ETC. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER AND SEWER LINES | | | ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH | | | LANDSCAPING. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS | | | REQUIRED TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES AND LABEL THEM ON THE | | | PLAN. | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. | | | PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT | | | MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | SHOW THE CALCULATION OF THE PERCENTAGE ON THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN BASED ON THE PROPOSED PLANT LIST. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 2/19/19: | | | 12. SATISFIED. SHEET L006 DOES NOT REPRESENT ANY | | | MISSING TREES FROM THE APPROVED PLANS BEING REPLACED AT | | | SOME OF THE TERMINAL ISLANDS AND THE LANDSCAPE BUFFERS | | | ALONG THE PROPERTY LINES. ALL TREES AS APPROVED NEED TO | | | BE SHOWN AS BEING REPLACED. | | | | | | 13. SATISFIED. THE WAX MYRTLE AS SPECIFIED ARE NOT A | | | SUCCESSFUL SPECIES WHEN USED IN PARKING LOT ISLANDS. | | | CHANGE TO A MORE DEPENDABLE AND SUSTAINABLE SPECIES. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 2/19/19: | | | 14. TWO NEW TERMINAL ISLANDS AND ONE INTERIOR ISLAND IN | | | THE PARKING AREA SOUTH OF THE NEW BUILDING ON SHEET | | | L102 DO NOT SHOW THE REQUIRED TREE. THESE ARE NEW | | | LANDSCAPE AREAS AND ARE REQUIRED TO MEET CODE. | | | | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-19-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
02-19-2019 |
Time |
17:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
02-19-2019 |
Time |
17:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-02-19 17:04:34 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: WEST PALM HOSPITAL CSPD Z18110023 | | | FEBRUARY 19, 2018 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. CORRECT THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN AND LIST FOR THE | | | FOLLOWING: | | | ? NOT SATISFIED. ALL TREES BELOW 20 FOOT CANOPY ARE TO | | | BE MITIGATED ONE FOR ONE AND THE CANOPY VALUE NEEDS TO | | | BE CORRECTED TO THE CATEGORY VALUE. I.E. LIVE OAK | | | CATEGORY 1, IS A 300 SQ FT CANOPY VALUE. BOTTLEBRUSH | | | CATEGORY 2 IS A 150 SQ FT CANOPY VALUE. SABAL PALM | | | CATEGORY 3 IS A 100 SQ FT CANOPY VALUE. CORRECT VALUE | | | AS SHOWN IS 16,395 SQ FT. | | | TREE CANOPY DIAMETER AND CANOPY VALUES MUST BE SHOWN | | | FOR EACH TREE TO BE REMOVED. | | | ? SATISFIED. TREES REMAINING WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION | | | LIMITS NEED TO BE SHOWN AS REQUIRING ROOT PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES | | | NATIVE TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE | | | OR RELOCATED. THERE ARE MULTIPLE LIVE OAKS THAT CAN BE | | | RELOCATED ON SITE TO AREAS WITHOUT TREES. THERE ARE | | | LARGE TREES WITHIN THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION THAT CAN | | | BE PRESERVED BY DESIGNING THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK LAYOUT | | | TO AVOID THEM. | | | LIVE OAK TREES 311, 314 AND 315 CAN BE PRESERVED IF THE | | | SIDEWALK CAN BE REDESIGNED, AND IF NOT, SINCE THEIR | | | CONDITION IS LISTED AS ?GOOD? ON THE TREE DISPOSITION | | | LIST, THEY MUST BE RELOCATED. | | | LIVE OAK TREES 363, 386, 387, 390, 391, 392, 393, 395, | | | 396, AND SABAL PALM 394 ARE REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED AS | | | THEIR CONDITION IS LISTED AS ?GOOD? ON THE TREE | | | DISPOSITION LIST. | | | | | | 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE AMOUNT OF OPEN | | | SPACE AND LANDSCAPE AREA ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE | | | AFFECTED AREA AND SHOW THE CHANGE FROM APPROVED PLAN. | | | THE CALCULATIONS AS SHOWN ARE NOT CLEAR, AND DO NOT ADD | | | UP. | | | THE CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE SHOWN FOR THE ENTIRE SITE, | | | AS ADDITIONAL AREA IS BEING ADDED TO THE PD. THE | | | REQUIRED OPEN SPACE FOR CS IS 40%. OPEN SPACE IS ALL | | | NON-BUILDING AREA. LANDSCAPE AREA SHOULD BE EQUAL OR | | | GREATER THAN 15%. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF TREES PROPOSED | | | COMPARED TO THE NUMBER OF TREES FROM THE APPROVED | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE AFFECTED AREA. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CORRECTED CHART SHOWING CURRENT | | | CODE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA FRIENDLY REQUIREMENTS | | | PER SECTION 94-442 (G) AND PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 50 | | | POINTS. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. ADD COLUMNS TO THE PLANT LIST FOR NATIVE | | | PLANT AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. SHOW ALL EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN WITH | | | IDENTIFYING TAGS ON THE PLAN AND INCLUDE ON THE PLANT | | | LIST. | | | | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND SCREENING FOR ALL | | | ABOVE GROUND UTILITY VALVES, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS, A/C | | | UNITS, ETC. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER AND SEWER LINES | | | ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH | | | LANDSCAPING. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS | | | REQUIRED TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES AND LABEL THEM ON THE | | | PLAN. | | | | | | 11. NOT SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 | | | L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT | | | MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT | | | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE | | | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH | | | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH | | | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. | | | SHOW THE CALCULATION OF THE PERCENTAGE ON THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN BASED ON THE PROPOSED PLANT LIST. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 2/19/19: | | | 12. SHEET L006 DOES NOT REPRESENT ANY MISSING TREES | | | FROM THE APPROVED PLANS BEING REPLACED AT SOME OF THE | | | TERMINAL ISLANDS AND THE LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ALONG THE | | | PROPERTY LINES. ALL TREES AS APPROVED NEED TO BE SHOWN | | | AS BEING REPLACED. | | | | | | 13. THE WAX MYRTLE AS SPECIFIED ARE NOT A SUCCESSFUL | | | SPECIES WHEN USED IN PARKING LOT ISLANDS. CHANGE TO A | | | MORE DEPENDABLE AND SUSTAINABLE SPECIES. | | | | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-10-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
12-10-2018 |
Time |
12:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
12-10-2018 |
Time |
12:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-12-10 12:27:37 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: WEST PALM HOSPITAL CSPD Z18110023 | | | DECEMBER 10, 2018 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1. CORRECT THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN AND LIST FOR THE | | | FOLLOWING: | | | ? ALL TREES BELOW 20 FOOT CANOPY ARE TO BE MITIGATED | | | ONE FOR ONE AND THE CANOPY VALUE NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED | | | TO THE CATEGORY VALUE. I.E. LIVE OAK CATEGORY 1, IS A | | | 300 SQ FT CANOPY VALUE. BOTTLEBRUSH CATEGORY 2 IS A 150 | | | SQ FT CANOPY VALUE. SABAL PALM CATEGORY 3 IS A 100 SQ | | | FT CANOPY VALUE. CORRECT VALUE AS SHOWN IS 16,395 SQ | | | FT. | | | ? TREES REMAINING WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS NEED | | | TO BE SHOWN AS REQUIRING ROOT PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES IN GOOD | | | CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. THERE | | | ARE MULTIPLE LIVE OAKS THAT CAN BE RELOCATED ON SITE TO | | | AREAS WITHOUT TREES. THERE ARE LARGE TREES WITHIN THE | | | LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION THAT CAN BE PRESERVED BY | | | DESIGNING THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK LAYOUT TO AVOID THEM. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE THE AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE AND LANDSCAPE AREA | | | ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE AFFECTED AREA AND SHOW | | | THE CHANGE FROM APPROVED PLAN. | | | | | | 4. PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF TREES PROPOSED COMPARED TO THE | | | NUMBER OF TREES FROM THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR | | | THE AFFECTED AREA. | | | | | | 5. PROVIDE A CORRECTED CHART SHOWING CURRENT CODE FOR | | | COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA FRIENDLY REQUIREMENTS PER | | | SECTION 94-442 (G) AND PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 50 POINTS. | | | | | | 6. ADD COLUMNS TO THE PLANT LIST FOR NATIVE PLANT AND | | | DROUGHT TOLERANCE. | | | | | | 7. SHOW ALL EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN WITH IDENTIFYING | | | TAGS ON THE PLAN AND INCLUDE ON THE PLANT LIST. | | | | | | | | | 8. PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF LIGHTING ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN | | | TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 9. PROVIDE LOCATIONS AND SCREENING FOR ALL ABOVE GROUND | | | UTILITY VALVES, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS, A/C UNITS, ETC. | | | | | | 10. SHOW LOCATIONS OF WATER AND SEWER LINES ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING. | | | SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS REQUIRED TO PROTECT | | | UTILITY LINES AND LABEL THEM ON THE PLAN. | | | | | | 11. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT | | | SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL | | | ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT | | | SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF | | | SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA | | | WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA | | | LANDSCAPES. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
12-13-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-05-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
06-05-2019 |
Time |
17:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
06-05-2019 |
Time |
17:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-06-05 17:32:15 | NO COMMENTS ON THE MAY 28, 2019 REVIEW SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-08-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
04-08-2019 |
Time |
14:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
04-08-2019 |
Time |
14:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-04-08 14:09:16 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE APRIL | | | 3, 2019 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE: | | | | | | 1. [REPEAT COMMENT] THE CITY'S VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD | | | 1929. THE CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USED OF NAVD 1988 | | | PROVIDED THE CONVERSION BETWEEN NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929 | | | IS ADDED TO THE PLANS. LABEL THE VERTICAL DATUM AND THE | | | NAVD1988 / NGVD1929 RELATIONSHIP ON EACH SHEET WITH | | | ELEVATION DATA. | | | | | | 2. [REPEAT COMMENT] COMPLETE THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION | | | NOTE #21 ON SHEET C001: | | | "21 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT ANY TREE " ... | | | "SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF NAME STANDARD DETAILS.". | | | | | | 3. COMPLETE SURVEY DATA NOTE #3 ON SHEET C001: | | | "3. ALL ELEVATIONS ON THE PLANS OR REFERENCED IN THE | | | SPECIFICATIONS ARE BASED ON [NAME OF DATUM] DATUM OF | | | [YEAR] (X.X.X.X. XX)." | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-15-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
02-15-2019 |
Time |
10:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
02-15-2019 |
Time |
10:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-02-15 10:36:38 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE | | | FEBRUARY 4, 2019 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE: | | | | | | 1. THE CITY'S VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD 1929. THE CITY HAS | | | ALLOWED THE USED OF NAVD 1988 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION | | | BETWEEN NAVD 1988 AND NGVD 1929 IS ADDED TO THE PLANS. | | | LABEL THE VERTICAL DATUM AND THE NAVD1988 / NGVD1929 | | | RELATIONSHIP ON EACH SHEET WITH ELEVATION DATA. | | | | | | 2. COMPLETE THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTE #21 ON SHEET | | | C001. | | | | | | 3. TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY MISSING. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-11-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
12-11-2018 |
Time |
08:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
12-11-2018 |
Time |
08:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-12-11 08:41:49 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | | | APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR | | | MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. LIST THE VERTICAL DATUM ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS. | | | THE CITY VERTICAL DATUM IS NGVD 1929. THE CITY HAS | | | ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD 1988 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION | | | EQUATION TO NGVD 1929 IS PROVIDED. | | | | | | 2. THE NAVD1988 / NGVD1929 CONVERSION EQUATION IS | | | NEEDED ON THE SURVEY. | | | | | | 3. MINIMUM 2 FEET OF FREEBOARD ABOVE THE FLOOD | | | ELEVATION IS REQUIRED FOR STRUCTURES WITHIN SPECIAL | | | FLOOD HAZARD AREAS. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE | | | ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE SFWMD ERP MODIFICATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT. | | | | | | 3. EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED | | | WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
04-09-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
04-09-2019 |
Time |
10:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-04-09 10:21:39 | SURVEY RECEIVED BUT NO RESPONSE TO ENGINEERING COMMENTS | | | IN RESPONSE LETTER. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-08-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
02-08-2019 |
Time |
10:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-02-08 10:14:26 | 1, WILL REVIEW WHEN REVISED SURVEY IS PROVIDED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-12-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
12-12-2018 |
Time |
06:51 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-12-12 06:51:12 | 1. SURVEY INCOMPLETE. | | | 2. MISSING ITEMS INCLUDE: | | | TITLE | | | LINE WORK | | | KEY MAP | | | BOUNDARY ANNOTATION | | | SHEET NUMBERS | | | MATCH LINES, ETC. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-28-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
08-28-2019 |
Time |
17:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
08-28-2019 |
Time |
17:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-08-28 17:21:28 | PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION PROVIDED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
06-04-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-06-04 14:02:23 | 1. (PREVIOUS COMMENT) ON SHEET C301, PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN | | | CONNECTION FROM THE SIDEWALK ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE | | | INTERNAL ROADWAY TO THE ENTRANCE OF THE SOUTH BUILDING. | | | | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] | | | (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
04-10-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-04-10 11:18:31 | 1. (PREVIOUS COMMENT) ON SHEET C301, PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN | | | CONNECTION FROM THE SIDEWALK ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE | | | INTERNAL ROADWAY TO THE ENTRANCE OF THE SOUTH BUILDING. | | | | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] | | | (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
02-13-2019 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-02-13 15:14:41 | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER. | | | 2. ON SHEET C301, THE EXISTING PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION, | | | WHICH CONNECTS TO THE EXISTING SIDEWALK ALONG THE | | | INTERNAL ROADWAY AND RUNS ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE | | | INTERNAL ROADWAY NEAR THE SOUTH BUILDING, WAS REMOVED | | | IN THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN. PLEASE MAINTAIN THE EXISTING | | | PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION BY PROVIDING THE CONNECTION ON | | | EITHER THE EAST SIDE OR WEST SIDE OF THE ROADWAY. | | | PROVIDE MARKED CROSSWALK ALONG THIS PEDESTRIAN | | | CONNECTION AS APPROPRIATE. | | | | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
12-10-2018 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-12-12 10:19:08 | Z18110023_JFK NORTH HOSPITAL MAJOR PD AMENDMENT | | | (NOVEMBER 13, 2018 SUBMITTAL) | | | TRAFFIC STUDY | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER. | | | 2. IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY, THE SOUTHERN DRIVEWAY DOES NOT | | | PERMIT EGRESS VEHICLES TO MAKE LEFT-TURN. PLEASE REVISE | | | THE TRIP ASSIGNMENT. | | | SITE PLAN | | | 3. ON SHEET C300, PROVIDE CROSSWALK FROM THE BUILDING | | | TO THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE INTERNAL ROADWAY. ALSO | | | PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP. | | | 4. ON SHEET C301, PROVIDE AUTOTURN PATH TO VERIFY IF A | | | PASSENGER CAR CAN MAKE RIGHT-TURN INTO THE FIRST | | | PARKING AISLE ON THE SOUTH. | | | 5. ON SHEET C301, PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION BETWEEN | | | THE EXISTING PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION NEAR THE MATCH LINE | | | WITH SHEET C300 AND THE PROPOSED BUILDING . | | | 6. PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING NEAR THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS. | | | SHING TSOI | | | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT | | | 561-494-1141 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-16-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
09-16-2019 |
Time |
11:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
08-28-2019 |
Time |
17:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-19-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
06-19-2019 |
Time |
10:36 |
Rev Time |
6.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
06-07-2019 |
Time |
14:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-06-19 15:06:42 | PB 1223I - MAY 24, 2019 RESUBMITTAL REVIEW | | | JFK NORTH BEHAVIORAL HEALTH EXPANSION | | | 2201 45TH STREET | | | | | | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN | | | (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT | | | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS | | | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | - THE ITEMS IN COMMENTS #1 AND 2 MUST BE SUBMITTED TO | | | THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, JUNE 21, 2019, | | | OR THE CASE WILL NOT BE SCHEDULED FOR THE JULY 16, 2019 | | | PLANNING BOARD MEETING. | | | | | | - THE COMMENTS THAT ARE PRECEDED WITH *** ARE ITEMS | | | THAT WILL NOT HOLD UP THE CASE PROCEEDING TO PLANNING | | | BOARD, HOWEVER, THEY MUST BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED | | | PRIOR TO THE CASE BEING SCHEDULED FOR CITY COMMISSION. | | | | | | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION | | | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS. | | | | | | 1) THE PLANS WERE NOT PROVIDED IN .PNG FORMAT. THE | | | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED IN WORD | | | FORMAT. | | | | | | 2) THE REQUIRED $600 RESUBMITTAL FEE WAS NOT INCLUDED | | | WITH THE MAY 24, 2019 RESUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 3) *** REPEAT COMMENT: THE UPDATED PALM BEACH COUNTY | | | TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS LETTER BASED ON THE | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED IN THE MAY 24, 2019 REVISED | | | TRAFFIC IMPACT EVALUATION WAS NOT SUBMITTED. | | | | | | 4) *** REPEAT COMMENT: THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROVIDED | | | WITH THE SURVEY OF THE ENTIRE CAMPUS, CREATED BY DAVID | | | LINDLEY (UPDATED ON JUNE 19, 2019 BASED ON CITY | | | SURVEYOR REVIEW OF THE PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED INCORRECT | | | LEGAL DESCRIPTION), DOES NOT MATCH THE LEGAL | | | DESCRIPTION IN THE UNITY OF TITLE. THE LEGAL | | | DESCRIPTION PROVIDED FOR THE UNITY OF TITLE (WHICH | | | COVERS THE ENTIRE AREA FOR THE EXPANDED JFK NORTH | | | CAMPUS CSPD) LISTS THE ENTIRE PARCEL AS HAVING 26.82 | | | ACRES, YET THE NEW SURVEY LISTS THE ENTIRE PARCEL AS | | | HAVING 27.03 ACRES. STAFF WILL BE USING THE INFORMATION | | | FROM THE JUNE 19, 2019 SURVEY AS THE ACREAGE FOR THE | | | ENTIRE CSPD. THE DATA TABLES ON THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE | | | PLANS NEED TO BASE THE DEVELOPMENT CALCULATIONS ON THE | | | ACCURATE PARCEL ACREAGE OF 27.03 ACRES. | | | | | | 5) *** NEW COMMENT: DUE TO THE EXPRESSED DESIRE TO | | | INCLUDE THE REGULATIONS FOR THE FUTURE SUBDIVISION OF | | | THE CSPD, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, THE SETBACKS FOR THE CSPD ARE: | | | | | | 25 FEET FOR THE FRONT - 45TH STREET | | | 25 FEET FOR THE CORNER SIDE - CONGRESS AVENUE | | | 15 FEET FOR THE SIDES - WEST PROPERTY LINE AND ALONG | | | THE 2151 45TH STREET PARCEL | | | 15 FEET FOR THE REAR - NORTH PROPERTY LINE | | | | | | THESE SETBACK LINES NEED TO BE CORRECTED ON THE OVERALL | | | SITE PLAN. | | | | | | 6) REVISED COMMENT: THE MAY 24, 2019 JUSTIFICATION | | | STATEMENT LISTS DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS BASED ON | | | WAIVERS TO PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS TO PERMIT THE FUTURE | | | SUBDIVISION OF THE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CSPD. NOTE: THE | | | CITY WILL NOT RELEASE THE UNITY OF TITLE UNTIL THE | | | APPLICATION FOR THE MINOR SUBDIVISION PLAT HAS BEEN | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED, APPROVED AND THE PLAT IS READY FOR | | | RECORDATION. STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSED WAIVERS | | | AND HAS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | A. INTERNAL ROW WITH MORE THAN 10 PARKING SPACES - | | | EXISTING ROWS EXCEEDING 10 SPACES ARE SHOWN ON THE | | | OVERALL SITE PLAN AND MAY REMAIN (EXISTING CONDITION | | | WAIVER); HOWEVER, NEW OR RECONFIGURED PARKING AREAS | | | MUST COMPLY WITH THE ZLDR IN PLACE AT THE TIME OF | | | PERMITTING FOR THE PARKING AREA. | | | | | | B. LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTH - NO INTERNAL LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFERS ARE REQUIRED FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL PARCELS THAT | | | MIGHT BE CREATED VIA SUBDIVISION, EXCEPT WHERE THE | | | PROPERTY LINE OF SUCH SUBDIVIDED LOT IS CONCURRENT WITH | | | A CSPD PERIMETER LOT LINE. IN THAT CASE A MINIMUM FIVE | | | (5) FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS REQUIRED. | | | | | | C. LANDSCAPE BUFFER MATERIAL - LANDSCAPE MATERIAL IS | | | REQUIRED IN ANY REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER. ALL MISSING | | | MATERIAL IN THE PERIMETER BUFFERS IS TO BE INSTALLED AS | | | PART OF THE CSPD EXPANSION. | | | | | | D. FOUNDATION LANDSCAPE - STAFF WILL NOT SUPPORT ANY | | | FOUNDATION PLANTING WAIVER. | | | | | | E. SITE IMPROVEMENTS - NEW PARCEL LINES MAY NOT CREATE | | | SETBACK CONFLICTS WHERE THEY DO NOT CURRENTLY EXIST. | | | NOTE: STAFF WILL SUPPORT A 5 FOOT SETBACK FOR NEW | | | INTERIOR PARCEL LINES, PROVIDED THAT THE ALL FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. | | | | | | F. MONUMENT SIGNS - SAME AS OVERALL SITE, MAY NOT BE | | | REBUILT IN THE EASEMENT. | | | | | | G. PARKING - CROSS PARKING IS PERMITTED WITHIN THE JFK | | | NORTH COMMUNITY SERVICE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. AN | | | INDIVIDUAL PARCEL IS NOT REQUIRED TO PROVIDE ITS ENTIRE | | | PARKING REQUIREMENT ON-SITE; HOWEVER, THE ENTIRE JFK | | | NORTH CSPD IS REQUIRED TO MEET MINIMUM PARKING | | | REQUIREMENTS. CROSS PARKING AND ACCESS AGREEMENTS MUST | | | BE RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORD. | | | | | | H. FAR - STAFF DOES NOT OBJECT TO ANY SPECIFIC PARCEL | | | EXCEEDING 1.0 FAR; HOWEVER, NO INDIVIDUAL PARCEL SHALL | | | NOT EXCEED 1.5 FAR. | | | | | | I. ALL NEW PARCELS WILL NEED TO FRONT ON A DEDICATED | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | | | | 7) *** NEW COMMENT: IN ORDER TO MITIGATE THE IMPACTS OF | | | NOT PROVIDING INTERIOR PARCEL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS THE | | | EXISTING PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFERS MUST BE ENHANCED. | | | HEDGES, CONFORMING TO THE ZLDR, MUST BE INSTALLED WHERE | | | MISSING. TREES, CONFORMING TO THE ZLDR MUST BE | | | INSTALLED UNLESS THE FPL EASEMENT PROHIBITS THE | | | PLACEMENT OF THE TREES. | | | | | | 8) *** NEW COMMENT: THE LANDSCAPE PLANS NEED TO BE | | | REVISED TO SHOW THAT ALL THE EXISTING TERMINAL AND | | | INTERIOR PARKING ISLANDS CONTAIN TREES IN ACCORDANCE | | | WITH THE ZLDR AND EVIDENCE (STUMPS) THAT TREES HAVE | | | BEEN REMOVED. | | | | | | 9) *** NEW COMMENT: PARKING TABLE: THE LISTED NUMBER OF | | | REQUIRED PARKING SPACES IS MORE THAN ARE REQUIRED. IT | | | APPEARS THAT THE 2% ADA SPACES WERE CALCULATED IN | | | ADDITION TO THE TOTAL NUMBER OF REQUIRED PARKING | | | SPACES. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE CITY REQUIRES THAT THE | | | NUMBER OF REQUIRED ADA SPACES (IN THIS CASE 2% OF THE | | | TOTAL) TO BE PROVIDED AS A SUBSET OF THE TOTAL NUMBER | | | OF REQUIRED SPACES, NOT IN ADDITION TO THE NUMBER OF | | | REQUIRED SPACES. SO FOR JFK NORTH, 676 PARKING SPACES | | | ARE REQUIRED (BASED ON BEDS, DOCTORS AND OFFICE SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE). OF THE 676 REQUIRED PARKING SPACES, 14 ARE | | | REQUIRED TO BE ADA PARKING SPACES. THE PARKING | | | REQUIREMENTS PORTION OF THE TABLE NEEDS TO BE UPDATED | | | ACCORDINGLY. NOTE: THE TABLE SHOWS THAT THE SITE HAS | | | EXCESS PARKING PROVIDED. | | | | | | 10) *** BICYCLE PARKING | | | | | | A. REVISED COMMENT: BASED ON THE 676 REQUIRED PARKING | | | SPACES, ONLY 34 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED. | | | UPDATE THE TABLE ACCORDINGLY. | | | | | | B. REVISED COMMENT: THE TABLE LISTS 36 BICYCLE PARKING | | | SPACES AS PROVIDED, YET THE PLANS LIST 40 BICYCLE | | | PARKING SPACES. | | | | | | C. REPEAT COMMENT: ALL NEW BICYCLE RACKS MUST INCLUDE | | | THE DIMENSIONS ON THE PLANS (SHEETS C002 AND C003). NO | | | DIMENSIONS WERE INCLUDED FOR THE NEW BICYCLE PARKING | | | PAD AT MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING 1. | | | | | | D. NEW COMMENT: THE NEW BICYCLE PARKING PAD NEAR THE ER | | | ENTRANCE SHOWS FIVE RACKS (10 PARKING SPACES) BUT LISTS | | | EIGHT PARKING SPACES. NOTE: SEE COMMENT #10A - MANY OF | | | THESE ARE NOT REQUIRED TO MEET CODE MINIMUM. | | | | | | 11) *** REPEAT COMMENT (BASED ON LANDSCAPE PLANNER SITE | | | VISIT): THE ADDITION TO THE NORTHERNMOST BEHAVIORAL | | | HEALTH BUILDING HAS RESULTED IN THE RECONSTRUCTION OF | | | THE CURRENT ACCESS DRIVE, INCLUDING A NEW DRAINAGE | | | LINE, NORTH OF THE BUILDING. THE PLANS AS PRESENTED | | | CAUSE THE REMOVAL OF MATURE TREES 311, 314 AND 315. | | | THESE TREES MUST BE PROTECTED. | | | | | | A. SHIFT THE DRAINAGE LINE TO THE SOUTH AND DESIGN SO | | | THAT THE CURB DRAIN AVOIDS TREE NUMBER 311. | | | B. THE ROADWAY, CURB AND SIDEWALK SHOULD EITHER BE 1) | | | SHIFTED SOUTH, 2) NARROW THE PAVEMENT WIDTH FROM 25 | | | FEET TO 20 FEET, 3) NARROW THE SIDEWALK TO SIX FEET, OR | | | 4) A COMBINATION OF THE ABOVE IN ORDER TO PERMIT TREES | | | 311, 314 AND 315 TO REMAIN IN PLACE. | | | | | | 12) *** REPEAT COMMENT (FROM LANDSCAPE REVIEWER | | | COMMENT): THE TWO TERMINAL ISLANDS IN THE NEW PARKING | | | AREA SOUTH OF THE SOUTHERN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH BUILDING | | | EXPANSION THAT WERE BUILT OVER THE EXISTING SEWER LINE | | | MUST BE WIDENED TO ACCOMMODATE THE REQUIRED TERMINAL | | | ISLAND TREES. THE SITE CONTAINS EXCESS PARKING SPACES, | | | SO THE ISLANDS CAN BE WIDENED BY REMOVING THE ADJACENT | | | PARKING SPACES. NOTE: THE PROVIDED LINE OF THE PARKING | | | TABLE MUST BE UPDATED ACCORDINGLY. | | | | | | 13) *** REPEAT COMMENT (FROM CITY'S TRANSPORTATION | | | ENGINEERING DIVISION COMMENT): THE SIDEWALK CONNECTION | | | TO THE WEST OF THE SOUTHERN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH BUILDING | | | NEEDS TO FOLLOW THE OPTION #3 MODEL PROPOSED BY THE | | | APPLICANT. HOWEVER, IT MUST NOT ONLY MEANDER AROUND | | | EXISTING TREE 378, BUT ALSO AVOID EXISTING TREE 364 AS | | | IT TIES INTO THE SIDEWALK ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE | | | BUILDING. | | | | | | 14) *** NEW COMMENT: DUE TO THE ADDITIONAL DETAIL | | | PROVIDED BY THESE PLANS, STAFF HAS NOTED THAT THE | | | REVISED OXYGEN TANK ENCLOSE (EXPANDED AS PART OF THE ER | | | EXPANSION PROJECT) ENCROACHES INTO THE DRIVE AISLE | | | AROUND THE BUILDING AND REDUCES IT TO SUBSTANDARD | | | TWO-WAY DIMENSION. IT NEEDS TO HAVE AT LEAST 18 FEET OF | | | TRAVEL LANE (20 FEET IS PREFERRED). | | | | | | 15) WAIVERS REQUIRED BASED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS | | | IDENTIFIED BY STAFF THAT STAFF CAN SUPPORT: | | | | | | A. INSTANCES OF PARKING ROWS WITH MORE THAN 10 SPACES. | | | - FIVE PARKING ROWS CONTAIN MORE THAN 10 PARKING | | | SPACES. ANY RECONSTRUCTION OF THESE PARKING AREAS WILL | | | NEED TO MEET ZLDR REQUIREMENTS. | | | B. AREAS WHERE THE MINIMUM FIVE FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER | | | AND MATERIAL IS NOT PROVIDED. | | | - TWO LOCATIONS AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE | | | (DRIVEWAY AND PARKING SPACE) | | | - NORTH OF THE NORTHERN CONGRESS AVENUE ENTRANCE, | | | BETWEEN THE TWO PARKING BAYS AND CONGRESS AVENUE. | | | BUFFER WIDTH IS AS SHOWN ON SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | - ALONG 2145 45TH STREET | | | - ALONG A PORTION OF THE WEST PROPERTY LINE, WEST OF | | | THE MAIN HOSPITAL BUILDING | | | | | | THESE AREAS ARE SHOWN ON THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | NOTE: IF ANY OF THE AREAS REFERENCED IN COMMENTS #15A | | | AND #15B ARE RECONSTRUCTED, THEY MUST COMPLY WITH THE | | | ZLDR IN PLACE AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING FOR THE | | | RECONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 16) IF REBUILT, ANY SIGNS CURRENTLY LOCATED WITHIN AN | | | FPL EASEMENT MUST BE MOVE OUT OF THE EASEMENT. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-30-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
04-30-2019 |
Time |
11:30 |
Rev Time |
6.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
04-24-2019 |
Time |
13:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-04-30 11:35:19 | PB 1223I - FIRST RESUBMITTAL REVIEW | | | JFK NORTH BEHAVIORAL HEALTH EXPANSION | | | 2201 45TH STREET | | | | | | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN | | | (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT | | | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS | | | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | - THE COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND | | | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, | | | MAY 24, 2019 TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE | | | JULY 16, 2019 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM | | | THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY JUNE 30, 2019), THE CASE | | | SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL | | | REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS WERE NOT | | | SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, SO THE APPLICATION IS ASSESSED | | | A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE IS 20% OF THE ORIGINAL | | | APPLICATION FEE ($600). | | | | | | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION | | | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS. | | | | | | 1) REVISED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE PALM | | | BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC APPROVAL LETTER; HOWEVER, THE | | | FOLLOWING ITEMS NEED TO BE EXPLAINED/CORRECTED: | | | | | | A. THE LETTER (AND THE TRAFFIC STUDY THAT WAS | | | SUBMITTED) INCLUDES THE SQUARE FOOTAGE/VEHICLE TRIPS | | | FOR PCN 74434306000001070, WHICH IS NOT PART OF THE JFK | | | NORTH CAMPUS CSPD. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THIS PARCEL WAS | | | INCLUDED IN THE TRAFFIC STATEMENT AND THUS THE TRAFFIC | | | APPROVAL LETTER FOR THE JFK NORTH CAMPUS CSPD. THIS | | | ADDS TWO MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 36,750 | | | SQUARE FEET (PAPA) TO THE TRAFFIC IMPACT OF THE JFK | | | NORTH CSPD. | | | B. THE TRAFFIC STUDY AND THE TRAFFIC LETTER LIST THE | | | EXISTING HOSPITAL AS HAVING 124,817 SQUARE FEET, WHICH | | | IS SHOWN BY PAPA AS THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF BUILDING 1 OF | | | THE JFK NORTH CAMPUS CSPD. PAPA SHOWS MULTIPLE HOSPITAL | | | BUILDINGS TOTALING 194,630 SQUARE FEET. THE BUILDING | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE LISTED ON SHEET C002 TOTALS 206,703 | | | SQUARE FEET OF EXISTING HOSPITAL. YOU NEED TO RECTIFY | | | THE EXISTING HOSPITAL SQUARE FOOTAGE ON ALL PLANS AND | | | DOCUMENTS. THEN THE TRAFFIC STATEMENT AND THE | | | CORRESPONDING TRAFFIC LETTER NEED TO BE UPDATED TO SHOW | | | ACCURATE CONDITIONS. CURRENTLY, THE EXISTING HOSPITAL | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT IS SIGNIFICANTLY LESS | | | THAN ACTUAL CONDITIONS ACCORDING TO THE TRAFFIC | | | STATEMENT. | | | | | | 2) NEW COMMENT: PLEASE PROVIDE THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION | | | FOR THE ENTIRE NEW JFK NORTH CAMPUS CSPD BOUNDARY IN | | | WORD. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THE LEGAL | | | DESCRIPTION PROVIDED FOR THE UNITY OF TITLE (WHICH | | | COVERS THE ENTIRE AREA FOR THE EXPANDED JFK NORTH | | | CAMPUS CSPD) LISTS THE ENTIRE PARCEL AS HAVING 26.82 | | | ACRES, YET THE NEW SURVEY LISTS THE ENTIRE PARCEL AS | | | HAVING ONLY 25.39 ACRES. THE ACREAGE AND LEGAL | | | DESCRIPTIONS ON THE UNITY OF TITLE AND THE SURVEY NEED | | | TO DESCRIBE THE SAME PROPERTY. | | | | | | 3) NEW COMMENT: ALL OF THE SITE FEATURES NEED TO HAVE A | | | UNIFORMLY DARK LINE WIDTH SO THAT THEY ARE LEGIBLE ON | | | THE PLANS. | | | | | | 4) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE SETBACK DIMENSION TO THE | | | EXISTING FREE STANDING MONUMENT SIGNS. PLEASE NOTE THAT | | | THE SURVEY SHOWS THE TWO SIGNS ALONG 45TH STREET IN THE | | | FPL EASEMENT WHICH IS NOT WHERE THEY WERE APPROVED ON | | | THE BUILDING PERMIT. THE ACTUAL SIGN SETBACKS NEED TO | | | BE VERIFIED. | | | | | | 5) REVISED COMMENT: THE MARCH 22, 2019 JUSTIFICATION | | | STATEMENT DOES NOT ADDRESS THE FUTURE SUBDIVISION OF | | | THE PROPERTY. AT SUCH TIME AS JFK NORTH APPLIES TO | | | SUBDIVIDE THE PROPERTY, A MAJOR AMENDMENT TO ADDRESS | | | ALL OF THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND ANY ASSOCIATED | | | WAIVERS WILL BE REQUIRED. PLEASE NOTE THAT MITIGATION | | | FOR NEWLY CREATED WAIVERS MAY BE REQUIRED WITH THE | | | FUTURE MAJOR AMENDMENT. | | | | | | 6) REVISED COMMENT: SINCE THERE IS NO SUBDIVISION, NO | | | CLARIFICATION ON PARKING USE IS REQUIRED WITH THIS | | | APPLICATION. | | | | | | 7) REVISED COMMENT: THE DATA TABLES ON THE SITE AND | | | LANDSCAPE PLANS NEED TO BASE THE DEVELOPMENT | | | CALCULATIONS ON THE ACCURATE PARCEL ACREAGE. THE SITE | | | AND LANDSCAPE PLANS DO NOT LIST THE IDENTICAL AMOUNT OF | | | ACREAGE, NOR DOES EITHER ONE OF THESE MATCH THE ACREAGE | | | LISTED ON EITHER OF THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS REFERENCED | | | IN COMMENT #2. | | | | | | 8) REPEAT COMMENT: THE SITE DATA TABLE ON SHEETS C002 | | | AND C003 NEEDS TO LIST THE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR EACH | | | BUILDING AND ITS USE. IF A BUILDING CONTAINS BEDS, THE | | | NUMBER OF BEDS WITHIN THE BUILDING NEEDS TO BE LISTED | | | AS WELL. THE TWO MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS WILL NEED TO | | | PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE BUILDINGS. | | | ----- THE DATA TABLES ON THE REVISED PLANS DO NOT | | | ACCURATELY REFLECT THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE TWO STORY | | | MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS, BUT RATHER IS ONLY PROVIDED | | | AS IF THEY ARE ONE STORY BUILDINGS. SEE COMMENT #1 FOR | | | ADDITIONAL DISCREPANCIES WHICH NEED TO BE RECTIFIED. | | | THE NUMBER OF BEDS IN EACH BUILDING WAS NOT PROVIDED SO | | | THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THE REQUIRED PARKING COUNTS. | | | | | | 9) PARKING TABLE: | | | | | | A. REVISED COMMENT: STAFF HAS COUNTED 793 REGULAR | | | PARKING SPACES FOR THE ENTIRE SITE, NOT 792 AS LISTED. | | | PLEASE VERIFY THE COUNTS. | | | | | | B. NEW COMMENT: THE PARKING REQUIREMENT FOR THE TWO | | | MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS WAS NOT PROVIDED ON THE | | | PARKING TABLE. MEDICAL OFFICE REQUIRES 1 PARKING SPACE | | | PER 200 SQUARE FEET. PROVIDE A LINE ITEM AND UPDATE THE | | | TOTAL REQUIRED. STAFF'S INITIAL CALCULATION SHOWS THAT | | | YOU REQUIRE 846 PARKING SPACES (EXCLUDES THE AMBULANCE | | | SPACES), WHILE THE PARKING TABLE ONLY SHOWS THAT THE | | | PROPOSED SITE PLAN PROVIDES 826 PARKING SPACES. AN | | | ADDITIONAL 20 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED. | | | | | | 10) SHEET C300 - REVISED COMMENT: I SPOKE WITH THE | | | SAMANTHA HILL IN THE BUILDING DIVISION REGARDING ADA | | | PARKING SPACES IN THE PARKING FIELD TO THE NORTH OF | | | THIS PROPOSED BUILDING. YOU NEED TO SHOW THE LOCATIONS | | | OF THE ENTRANCES TO THE BUILDING FOR BOTH PUBLIC AND | | | EMPLOYEES AND THE ROUTE OF TRAVEL TO THE ENTRANCES. THE | | | CLOSEST PARKING SPACES ALONG THE ROUTE NEED TO BE THE | | | ADA PARKING SPACES. ---- THE REVISED SITE PLAN SHOWS A | | | DOOR ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE EXISTING BUILDING AS | | | "RESTRICTED ENTRY". WHO USES THIS ENTRANCE? IF | | | EMPLOYEES USE THE ENTRANCE, IT STILL REQUIRES ADA | | | PARKING SPACES IN THE NEARBY PARKING FIELD AND AN | | | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM THE PARKING AREA TO THE BUILDING. | | | | | | 11) SHEET C301 | | | | | | A. REVISE COMMENT: THE NORTHERN OF THE TWO NEW WESTERN | | | PARKING FIELDS STILL HAS A 22 FOOT WIDE AISLE WIDTH | | | DIMENSION (SHOWN CLEARLY ON SHEET C003) AND ONE OF THE | | | AISLES SHOWS 24 FEET ON SHEET C301 YET ONLY 22 FEET ON | | | SHEET C003. ALL PLANS NEED TO SHOW SAME, CORRECT 24 | | | FOOT CONDITION. | | | | | | B. REVISED COMMENT: I SPOKE WITH THE SAMANTHA HILL IN | | | THE BUILDING DIVISION REGARDING ADA PARKING SPACES FOR | | | THE REVISED PARKING FIELD. YOU NEED TO SHOW THE | | | LOCATIONS OF THE ENTRANCES TO THE BUILDING FOR BOTH | | | PUBLIC AND EMPLOYEES AND THE ROUTE OF TRAVEL TO THE | | | ENTRANCES. THE CLOSEST PARKING SPACES ALONG THE ROUTE | | | NEED TO BE THE ADA PARKING SPACES. THIS MIRRORS HOW TO | | | VERIFY THE SIMILAR BUILDING DIVISION COMMENT FROM PPRC. | | | ------- NO ENTRANCES ARE SHOWN NEAR THESES PARKING | | | SPACES. WHO DO THEY SERVE? YOU HAVE FAILED TO LABEL | | | WHAT APPEAR TO BE DOORS IN THIS AREA. THEY NEED TO BE | | | LABELED. IF THERE ARE MULTIPLE ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCES, | | | THEN THE SPACES NEED TO BE DISTRIBUTED TO SERVICE THEM. | | | CONVERSELY, DEPENDING ON WHAT THESE DOORS ARE USED OR, | | | YOU MAY NOT NEED THE ADA PARKING SPACES AT THIS | | | LOCATION. | | | | | | 12) BICYCLE PARKING REVISED COMMENTS | | | | | | A. THE DATA TABLE FOR THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED BICYCLE | | | PARKING SPACES NEEDS TO BE UPDATED TO REFLECT THE | | | ACTUAL NUMBER OF REQUIRED PARKING SPACES FROM COMMENT | | | #9B. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE CITY ONLY REQUIRES ONE | | | PARKING SPACE PER 20 REQUIRED PARKING SPACES, SO YOU | | | WILL REQUIRE LESS BICYCLE PARKING SPACES THAN THE 55 | | | LISTED. | | | | | | B. EVERY PRINCIPAL ENTRANCE MUST HAVE BICYCLE PARKING | | | TO COMPLY WITH THE CODE. GROUPING THE MAJORITY OF THE | | | BICYCLE PARKING SPACES AS SHOWN ON SHEET C301 IS NOT | | | ACCEPTABLE AS NO BUILDING ENTRANCES WERE LISTED AS | | | BEING AT THIS LOCATION. | | | | | | C. ALL NEW AND ENLARGED BICYCLE RACKS MUST INCLUDE THE | | | DIMENSIONS ON THE PLANS (SHEETS C002 AND C003). | | | | | | D. MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING 1 REQUIRES BICYCLE PARKING | | | AT THE ENTRANCE. | | | | | | E. MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING 2 HAS A WAVE STYLE BICYCLE | | | RACK THAT IS NOT CALLED OUT ON THE PLANS. PROVIDE THE | | | DIMENSIONS OF THE RACK AND HOW IT SITS ON THE PAD SO | | | THAT STAFF CAN DETERMINE HOW MANY BICYCLES IT CAN PARK. | | | THIS WILL THEN BE REFLECTED ON THE NUMBER OF SPACES | | | PROVIDED TABLE. | | | | | | 13) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE UTILITY RELEASE | | | LETTERS. THERE ARE TREES AND MODIFIED PARKING BEING | | | PROPOSED FOR THE FPL EASEMENT ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY | | | LINE. THIS NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED IN THE RELEASE LETTER. | | | | | | 14) NEW COMMENT: THE LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOW A LINE | | | PATTERN THAT IS DESIGNATED AS THE "PROPERTY LINE"? AND | | | A SEPARATE LINE PATTERN THAT IS DESIGNATED THE "LIMITS | | | OF THE WEST PALM HOSPITAL CSPD". THESE TWO LINES MUST | | | BE THE SAME. | | | | | | 15) NEW COMMENT: THERE ARE AREAS ALONG THE CSPD | | | BOUNDARY THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THE MINIMUM REQUIRED FIVE | | | FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER. PROVIDE A FIVE FOOT OFFSET | | | LINE TO SHOW THE REQUIRED BUFFER LOCATION ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. WHERE THE BUFFER IS NOT MET, PROVIDE | | | THE ACTUAL DIMENSION OF THE BUFFER. STAFF NEEDS THESE | | | DIMENSIONS TO ADDRESS THE EXISTING NON-CONFORMITIES IN | | | THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. | | | | | | 16) NEW COMMENT: THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FAILS TO CLEARLY | | | SHOW THE 12 FOOT WIDE FPL EASEMENT ON THE NORTH, SOUTH | | | AND WEST PROPERTY LINES. | | | | | | 17) NEW COMMENT: SHEET C003 SHOWS PARKING STALLS HAVING | | | A 17 FOOT DEPTH WITH A LANDSCAPE DIVIDER MEDIAN IN | | | FRONT OF THEM. SOME OF THESE HAVE A 25 FOOT AND SOME | | | HAVE A 24 FOOT DRIVE AISLE BEHIND THEM (SOME SHARE A 25 | | | FOOT DRIVE AISLE). THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS PERMIT AN OVERHANG INTO THE DIVIDER MEDIAN; | | | HOWEVER, THE TOTAL SPACE DEPTH PLUS A TWO FOOT OVERHANG | | | MUST TOTAL 18 FEET. FIELD VERIFY THE DIMENSIONS OF THE | | | SPACES, INCLUDING THE WHEEL STOP LOCATION AND PROVIDE A | | | DETAIL OF EACH OF THE ROWS SHOWING 17 FOOT DEEP PARKING | | | SPACES. STAFF NEEDS THESE DIMENSIONS TO ADDRESS ANY | | | EXISTING NON-CONFORMITIES IN THE DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS. | | | | | | 18) NO LANDSCAPE SHEET WAS PROVIDED FOR THE NORTHWEST | | | QUADRANT OF THE SITE. THIS NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED AND | | | CORRECTLY REFLECTED ON ALL THE LANDSCAPE DATA TABLES. | | | | | | 19) WAIVERS REQUIRED BASED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS | | | IDENTIFIED BY STAFF: | | | | | | A. INSTANCES OF PARKING ROWS WITH MORE THAN 10 SPACES. | | | B. AREAS WHERE THE MINIMUM FIVE FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER | | | IS NOT PROVIDED. | | | C. THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER MATERIAL IS NOT | | | PROVIDED ALONG THE NORTH, SOUTH AND WEST PROPERTY LINES | | | WHERE THE FPL EASEMENT IS LOCATED. | | | D. THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER MATERIAL OR WIDTH | | | PROVIDED ALONG PORTIONS OF THE EAST PROPERTY LINE. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-01-2019 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
03-01-2019 |
Time |
15:16 |
Rev Time |
3.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2019-03-01 15:17:12 | PB 1223I - FIRST RESUBMITTAL REVIEW | | | JFK NORTH BEHAVIORAL HEALTH EXPANSION | | | 2201 45TH STREET | | | | | | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN | | | (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT | | | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS | | | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND | | | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, | | | MARCH 29, 2019 TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE | | | MAY 21, 2019 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM | | | THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY MAY 1, 2019), THE CASE | | | SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL | | | REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS WERE NOT | | | SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, SO THE APPLICANTION IS ASSESSED | | | A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE IS 20% OF THE ORIGINAL | | | APPLICATION FEE ($600). | | | | | | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION | | | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS. | | | | | | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE PALM BEACH COUNTY | | | TRAFFIC APPROVAL LETTER. | | | | | | 2) REPEAT COMMENT: THE SURVEY PROVIDED WITH THE | | | APPLICATION DOES NOT REFLECT THE BOUNDARY OF THE WEST | | | PALM BEACH HOSPITAL COMMUNITY SERVICE PLANNED | | | DEVELOPMENT AS DESCRIBED IN ORDINANCE NO. 4503-14. | | | | | | 3) REVISED COMMENT: SHEET C002 | | | | | | A. THE OVERALL SITE PLAN THAT WAS PROVIDED FAILS TO | | | PROVIDE ANY DIMENSIONAL INFORMATION, SUCH AS SETBACKS, | | | LANDSCAPE AREAS, BUFFER WIDTHS, WALK WAY AND DRIVE | | | AISLE WIDTHS, PARKING STALL WIDTH AND DEPTH, AND | | | BUILDING DIMENSIONS (IF THE PLANS NEED TO BE ON | | | MULTIPLE SHEETS FOR THE INFORMATION TO BE LEGIBLE, THIS | | | MUST BE DONE). ADDITIONALLY, THE LOCATIONS OF | | | FREESTANDING SIGNS, INTERNAL DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, | | | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, FENCES/WALLS, GAZEBOS AND OTHER | | | SITE FEATURES NEED TO BE SHOWN AND LABELED. | | | | | | B. THE APPLICATION IS BEING REVISED TO EXPAND THE CSPD | | | BOUNDARY, BASED ON THE STATED DESIRE TO SELL PORTIONS | | | OF THE PROPERTY. THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT IS | | | REQUESTING WAIVERS TO ALLOW THE REMOVAL OF THE UNITY OF | | | TITLE AND THEN THE FUTURE SALE OF PROPERTY WITHOUT THE | | | NEED FOR A FUTURE MAJOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT. | | | IN ORDER TO INCORPORATE THE WAIVERS IN THE CURRENT | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, YOU WILL NEED TO PROVIDE A | | | TABLE SHOWING ALL OF THE ZONING INFORMATION ON THE | | | PLANS SO THAT STAFF CAN DETERMINE WHAT WAIVERS ARE | | | REQUIRED. THIS INCLUDES WHERE THE PROPOSED PROPERTY | | | LINES WILL BE (A SUBDIVISION MAY BE REQUIRED), SETBACKS | | | TO NEW INTERNAL PROPERTY LINES, FUTURE PARCEL SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE, FAR, LANDSCAPE COVERAGE, PERVIOUS SURFACE, | | | ETC. | | | | | | C. YOU WILL NEED TO CLARIFY HOW PARKING WILL FUNCTION | | | AMONG THE PROPOSED PARCELS - EX. STAND ALONE OR SHARED. | | | | | | D. THE SETBACK TABLE IS FOR THE ENTIRE CSPD, NOT THE | | | PROPOSED BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4) REQUIRES SURVEY TO VERIFY: THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE | | | PLANS NEED TO SHOW THE ACCURATE CSPD BOUNDARIES AND | | | THIS NEEDS TO BE REFLECTED ON THE SITE DATA TABLES FOR | | | BOTH THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | | | | 5) REPEAT COMMENT: EACH BUILDING ON SHEET C002 NEEDS TO | | | BE LABELED. THE SITE DATA TABLE ON SHEET C002 NEEDS TO | | | LIST THE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR EACH BUILDING AND ITS USE. | | | IF A BUILDING CONTAINS BEDS, THE NUMBER OF BEDS WITHIN | | | THE BUILDING NEEDS TO BE LISTED AS WELL. THE TWO | | | MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS WILL NEED TO PROVIDE THE TOTAL | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 6) PARKING TABLE: | | | | | | A. REPEAT COMMENT: THE PARKING COUNT IS INCORRECT FOR | | | THE ENTIRE SITE (PROPOSED CSPD). STAFF HAS COUNTED 783 | | | REGULAR AND 34 ADA PARKING SPACES FOR THE ENTIRE SITE. | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS NUMBER WILL BE REDUCED WHEN THE | | | PARKING ROW WITH 12 PARKING SPACES IS CORRECTED. | | | | | | B. REPEAT COMMENT: THE PARKING TABLE NEEDS TO LIST ONLY | | | THE PARKING COUNTS AFTER THE PROJECT IS COMPLETED. THE | | | EXISTING CONDITIONS NEED TO BE STATED IN THE | | | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. ---- DO NOT INCLUDE THE | | | EXISTING PARKING COUNTS ON THE PARKING TABLE. | | | | | | C. NEW COMMENT: ALL OF THE PARKING SPACES SHOWN ON | | | SHEET C002 NEED TO BE STRIPED AND COUNTED. THERE ARE | | | THREE PARKING BAYS ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE SITE THAT DO | | | NOT SHOW THE REQUIRED STRIPING AND THERE IS A PARKING | | | BAY THAT DOES NOT LABEL THE TWO EXISTING PARKING | | | SPACES. THERE ARE PARKING SPACES IN THE PARKING AREAS | | | AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE THAT DO NOT SHOW | | | THE REQUIRED STRIPING. | | | | | | 7) SHEET C300 - REVISED COMMENT: I SPOKE WITH THE | | | SAMANTHA HILL IN THE BUILDING DIVISION REGARDING ADA | | | PARKING SPACES IN THE PARKING FIELD TO THE NORTH OF | | | THIS PROPOSED BUILDING. YOU NEED TO SHOW THE LOCATIONS | | | OF THE ENTRANCES TO THE BUILDING FOR BOTH PUBLIC AND | | | EMPLOYEES AND THE ROUTE OF TRAVEL TO THE ENTRANCES. THE | | | CLOSEST PARKING SPACES ALONG THE ROUTE NEED TO BE THE | | | ADA PARKING SPACES. | | | | | | 8) SHEET C301 | | | | | | A. REVISED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING DIMENSION | | | LINES FOR ALL THE NEWLY STRIPED PARKING ROWS, BOTH | | | WIDTH AND DEPTH; HOWEVER, THERE ARE INSTANCES WHERE THE | | | DIMENSION TAG DOES NOT GO FROM CURB FACE TO CURB FACE | | | TO SHOW THE PROPER BAY DIMENSION. | | | | | | B. REPEAT COMMENT: ONE OF THE RE-STRIPED PARKING ROWS | | | SHOWS A PARKING STALL DEPTH DIMENSION OF ONLY 15 FEET. | | | THIS NEEDS TO BE A MINIMUM OF 18 FEET. ---- THE | | | COMMENTS STATE THAT DIMENSION LINES WERE ADDED FOR THIS | | | PARKING BAY, BUT THEY WERE NOT. | | | | | | C. NEW COMMENT: THE REVISED PARKING FIELD SHOWS A ROW | | | WITH 12 PARKING SPACES (EXCEEDS THE 10 IN A ROW | | | PERMITTED BY THE ZLDR) AND A ROW THAT HAS 8 PARKING | | | SPACES, YET IS LABELED AS 7 PARKING SPACES. BOTH OF | | | THESE NEED TO BE CORRECTED. | | | | | | D. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: DO NOT USE BOTH WHEEL STOPS | | | AND CURBS AT THE HEAD OF A PARKING SPACE. FOR SPACES | | | THAT HAVE CURBS, THE CURB SHOULD BE MOVED TO CREATE A | | | TWO (2) FOOT OVERHANG (REPLACE THE WHEEL STOP WITH THE | | | CURB AND THE CAR HANGS OVER TWO FEET OF WIDENED | | | SIDEWALK OR LANDSCAPE). | | | | | | E. REVISED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE 22 FOOT | | | WIDE AISLE WIDTH DIMENSION IN THE WESTERN PARKING FIELD | | | THAT IS BEING RECONSTRUCTED AND RE-STRIPED. THIS | | | DIMENSION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE REQUIRED MINIMUM 24 | | | FOOT AISLE WIDTH FOR PARKING LOTS THAT HAVE 90 DEGREE | | | PARKING, SO IT MUST BE CORRECTED. | | | | | | F. REVISED COMMENT: I SPOKE WITH THE SAMANTHA HILL IN | | | THE BUILDING DIVISION REGARDING ADA PARKING SPACES FOR | | | THE REVISED PARKING FIELD. YOU NEED TO SHOW THE | | | LOCATIONS OF THE ENTRANCES TO THE BUILDING FOR BOTH | | | PUBLIC AND EMPLOYEES AND THE ROUTE OF TRAVEL TO THE | | | ENTRANCES. THE CLOSEST PARKING SPACES ALONG THE ROUTE | | | NEED TO BE THE ADA PARKING SPACES. THIS MIRRORS HOW TO | | | VERIFY THE SIMILAR BUILDING DIVISION COMMENT FROM PPRC | | | . | | | | | | 9) REPEAT COMMENT: THE SITE PLANS SHOW THAT THE SITE IS | | | DEFICIENT IN BICYCLE PARKING SO CODE COMPLIANT BICYCLE | | | PARKING MUST BE PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE CAMPUS AND THE | | | DATA TABLES AND SITE DETAILS UPDATED ACCORDINGLY. | | | | | | A. THE DATA TABLES WERE NOT UPDATED TO REFLECT THE | | | REQUIRED OR PROVIDED BICYCLE PARKING COUNTS. NO BICYCLE | | | PARKING IS SHOWN FOR THE TWO MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS. | | | EXISTING OR ADDING BICYCLE PARKING TO THESE TWO | | | LOCATIONS WILL INCREASE THE "PROVIDED" COUNTS. | | | | | | B. THE PROPOSED 8 SPACE BICYCLE RACK NEEDS TO HAVE THE | | | DIMENSIONS INCLUDED ON THE SITE PLAN AS WELL AS A | | | BICYCLE RACK DETAIL. THE ZLDR REQUIRE THAT BICYCLE | | | PARKING BE LOCATED AS NEAR THE PRINCIPAL ENTRANCE OF | | | THE BUILDING AS PRACTICABLE, SO STAFF WILL USE THE | | | ENTRANCE PLANS REQUIRED BY COMMENTS 7 AND 8F TO | | | EVALUATE THE LOCATION OF THIS PROPOSED BICYCLE RACK. | | | | | | 10) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE UTILITY RELEASE | | | LETTERS. | | | | | | 11) REPEAT COMMENT: SHEET C101 STATES THAT THERE IS | | | STRIPING BEING REMOVED FROM THE WESTERN PORTION OF THE | | | PARKING AREA, YET SHEET C301 DOES NOT CALL OUT THAT | | | THIS AREA IS BEING RE-STRIPED (INDICATES THAT THE | | | STRIPING IS EXISTING). THE COMMENT RESPONSE STATES THAT | | | THERE IS NO CURRENT STRIPING IN THIS PARKING AREA, | | | WHICH MEANS THAT SHEET C301 DEFINITELY NEEDS TO SHOW | | | NEW, CODE COMPLIANT STRIPING WITH DIMENSIONS. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-11-2018 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
12-11-2018 |
Time |
16:06 |
Rev Time |
3.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
12-11-2018 |
Time |
10:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2018-12-11 16:07:01 | PB 1223I | | | JFK NORTH BEHAVIORAL HEALTH EXPANSION | | | 2201 45TH STREET | | | | | | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN | | | (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT | | | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS | | | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND | | | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, | | | DECEMBER 28, 2018, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR | | | THE FEBRUARY 19, 2019 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS | | | FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS/THE PPRC MEETING (BY | | | FEBRUARY 12, 2019), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED | | | WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW | | | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600). | | | | | | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION | | | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS. | | | | | | 1) PROVIDE THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC APPROVAL | | | LETTER. | | | | | | 2) THE SURVEY PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION DOES NOT | | | REFLECT THE BOUNDARY OF THE WEST PALM BEACH HOSPITAL | | | COMMUNITY SERVICE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AS DESCRIBED IN | | | ORDINANCE NO. 4503-14. | | | | | | 3) PROVIDE A SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE ENTIRE | | | CSPD WHICH SHOWS COMPLIANCE WITH ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATION REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 4) THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS NEED TO SHOW THE | | | ACCURATE CSPD BOUNDARIES AND THIS NEEDS TO BE REFLECTED | | | ON THE SITE DATA TABLES FOR BOTH THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE | | | PLANS. | | | | | | 5) EACH BUILDING ON SHEET C002 NEEDS TO BE LABELED. THE | | | SITE DATA TABLE ON SHEET C002 NEEDS TO LIST THE SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE FOR EACH BUILDING AND ITS USE. IF A BUILDING | | | CONTAINS BEDS, THE NUMBER OF BEDS WITHIN THE BUILDING | | | NEEDS TO BE LISTED AS WELL. | | | | | | 6) PARKING TABLE: | | | | | | A. THE PARKING COUNT IS INCORRECT FOR THE CSPD. WITHIN | | | THE CSPD THERE ARE 664 REGULAR AND 30 ADA PARKING | | | SPACES FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT. THE SITE DATA TABLE | | | INCORRECTLY INCLUDES SPACES FOR THE MEDICAL OFFICE | | | BUILDING THAT IS OUTSIDE OF THE CSPD AND EXCLUDES SOME | | | SPACES WITHIN THE CSPD. | | | B. THE PARKING TABLE NEEDS TO LIST ONLY THE PARKING | | | COUNTS AFTER THE PROJECT IS COMPLETED. THE EXISTING | | | CONDITIONS NEED TO BE STATED IN THE JUSTIFICATION | | | STATEMENT. | | | C. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THERE WILL BE NO ADDITIONAL | | | DOCTORS ADDED TO PROVIDE TREATMENT FOR THE ADDITIONAL | | | 13,000 SQUARE FEET OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH TREATMENT | | | FACILITIES. | | | | | | 7) BOTH THE CSPD AND THE COMMUNITY SERVICE ZONED | | | PORTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF THE PB, INC., | | | OWNED PROPERTY HAVE A UNITY OF TITLE, WHICH PERMITTED | | | THE INSTALLATION OF THE SIGNS ALONG 45TH STREET. SINCE | | | THE PROPERTIES ARE UNIFIED, THIS IS A CORNER LOT WITH | | | 45TH STREET BEING THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE AND CONGRESS | | | AVENUE BEING THE CORNER SIDE PROPERTY LINE. THE SETBACK | | | TABLE MUST REFLECT THIS. THE DIMENSION LINES FOR THE | | | CLOSEST BUILDING POINTS TO THE PROPERTY LINE NEED TO BE | | | SHOWN. NOTE: THE DIMENSION TO THE CONGRESS AVENUE | | | (CORNER SIDE) DO NOT NEED TO BE SHOWN FOR THE TWO | | | PROPOSED BUILDINGS, SINCE THERE ARE INTERVENING | | | BUILDINGS WHICH WILL SHOW SETBACK COMPLIANT DIMENSION | | | LINES. | | | | | | 8) SHEET C300 | | | | | | A. REMOVE THE SITE DATA TABLE. IT IS NOT REQUIRED ON | | | EACH INDIVIDUAL SHEET, JUST THE OVERALL SITE PLAN. | | | B. WHERE DOES THE WALKWAY BY THE DOOR ON THE WEST SIDE | | | OF THE BUILDING LEAD TO? IT IS DANGEROUS TO DISCHARGE | | | FOLKS INTO THE DRIVEWAY. | | | C. PLEASE VERIFY WITH THE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES | | | DIVISION THAT NO ADA PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED IN THE | | | PARKING FIELD TO THE NORTH OF THIS PROPOSED BUILDING. | | | | | | 9) SHEET C301 | | | | | | A. REMOVE THE SITE DATA TABLE. IT IS NOT REQUIRED ON | | | EACH INDIVIDUAL SHEET, JUST THE OVERALL SITE PLAN. | | | B. PROVIDE DIMENSION LINES FOR ALL THE NEWLY STRIPED | | | PARKING ROWS, BOTH WIDTH AND DEPTH. | | | C. ONE OF THE RE-STRIPED PARKING ROWS SHOWS A PARKING | | | STALL DEPTH DIMENSION OF ONLY 15 FEET. THIS NEEDS TO BE | | | A MINIMUM OF 18 FEET. | | | D. STRIPING NOT "A" INCORRECTLY CALLS OUT 6 INCH WHITE | | | STRIPES FOR THE PARKING SPACES - THEY ARE TO BE 4 | | | INCHES AS SHOWN ON THE PARKING DETAIL. | | | E. WHAT IS THE 19 FOOT MOUNTABLE AREA? | | | F. WHY DO SOME PARKING STALLS HAVE WHEEL STOPS AND | | | OTHERS NOT HAVE WHEEL STOPS. IF CURBING IS TO BE USED, | | | THEN HAVE THE SPACES 16 FEET DEEP WITH A TWO FOOT OVER | | | HANG. | | | G. WHY ARE SOME PARKING SPACES 9 FEET WIDE AND OTHERS | | | 10 FEET WIDE? | | | H. CLEARLY LABEL THE D CURBING. | | | I. INCLUDE AISLE WIDTH DIMENSION LINES IN THE WESTERN | | | PARKING FIELD THAT IS BEING RECONSTRUCTED AND | | | RE-STRIPED. | | | J. PROVIDE THE DRIVE AISLE WITH BEHIND THE 90 DEGREE | | | PARKING INTO THE MAIN CAMPUS ROADWAY TO VERIFY THAT IT | | | IS A MINIMUM OF 24 FEET WIDE AT THIS POINT. | | | K. PLEASE VERIFY WITH THE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES | | | DIVISION THAT THE LOCATION OF THE ADA PARKING SPACES | | | COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENT THAT THE ADA PARKING | | | SPACES ARE CLOSEST TO THE ENTRANCE. THE TWO PROPOSED | | | ADA PARKING SPACES APPEAR TO SERVE NOT BUILDING | | | ENTRANCE. | | | | | | 10) NEITHER THE SITE PLANS NOT THE ELEVATIONS SHOW ANY | | | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. PLEASE SHOW THE MECHANICAL | | | EQUIPMENT ON THE PLANS. PLEASE REMEMBER THAT BOTH | | | ROOFTOP AND GROUND MOUNTED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MUST BE | | | SCREENED. | | | | | | 11) THE SITE PLANS SHOW THAT THE SITE IS DEFICIENT IN | | | BICYCLE PARKING SO CODE COMPLIANT BICYCLE PARKING MUST | | | BE PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE CAMPUS AND THE DATA TABLES | | | AND SITE DETAILS UPDATED ACCORDINGLY. | | | | | | 12) PROVIDE THE UTILITY RELEASE LETTERS. | | | | | | 13) THE INFORMATION ON SHEET C101 REGARDING THE REMOVAL | | | OF STRIPING IS NOT REFLECTED ON SHEET C301 WHERE THIS | | | AREA IS BEING RE-STRIPED. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |